The URL can be used to link to this page

21317 76TH AVE W (3).PDF111111111111 6328 21317 76TH AVE W 4,00M�5 190 LDAY 7,� CITY OF EDMONDS 18 go - I g q Address of Construction 61 �/) - /�7- /�- Property Legal Description (Include all easements): SIDE SEWER PERMIT '� I PERMIT - 0 *3367 z 1- U LIFT S -,A 0 RECEIVED J U N 3 0 1997 'UBLIG WORKS DEpl.-., ER Owner and/or Co tracto n 0�)Ifi / ah 1, O's M 2ht (,-�4 C; 0 u ng ermit No. State License No 03?, [3 Single Family Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes 01-M"Ulti-Family (No. of Units 19 RW Construction Permit'No. Commercial Cross other Private Property:k No El Yes Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I,,i t-hat I have read a I cc ity requirements ,pe'sh a mpy k.-�Pedicated on the bacRo,� theVermit Card. z -Z<!� - 4V Date CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE USE.:ONLY FOR INSPECTION CALL'?rl-SM ,,.PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 60-00 7-71-Oo-05 /- e Permit Fee: Issued By Trunk Charge: Date Issued: Assessment Fee- / 52-0. Z-0 Receipt No.: /00 1,4 f -11 c/o i w S P. T 0 G Q AJDEE- Lid No.: — Partial Inspection: INMM TAP (0/10/" oNN. '7/2A7 J, -L. Date —Initial — Comments Reason Rejected: Date —Initial — Final Inspection Approved: Date #I,— Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Greei Copy; Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3 90 NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on this map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION [:) REPAIRS n LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER ...... GqF4. ..... 61-P-5 .... cpt--st ........................ CONTRACTOR ............................................................... ..................... PERMIT NO. --- 8.40.7- JOB ADDRESS .... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ..... ................................ BLOCK NO . .................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME OF ADDITION ........................................................... 1 .... 14/ Ae- o CIO W a %c/o I I �" N- III I M. IS uj- Cor. 0'r-849- i Approved: 0J rr,,. twal. I clo 0 F c..,6 rcu -2 1 0V\ tftal4i I,q, 06-cp (. 'PV c to W,3F cv"640 PWW-0001-1 1/75 (REVA 1/78) DATE At-1 .............. B ----------------------------- The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION 0 REPAIRS'r-1 LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . .................. CoNsT R '5Q) 34(6 OWNER ........... CONTRACTOR .....Gjc!kCC.kALC-%14-T....B.RCkTtte-R5 ..... PE MIT NO. '370-347 JOB ADDRESS ............................... ........ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT.NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . .............. 5 -7- o. 3.449 ................................................ : .................................................................................................................. 21-51,5-7(orN 9703-44 spuck t 12. PWW-0001-1 1175 (REV.1 V78) 2.131 S 7G-rt-% 19-70347 221 NAMEOF ADDITION ..: ......................................... * ........................................ I ................................. N't"Cappee 5 1.4=- :D Z"SuPest"M I.P.S.-PE. 1460 PSA. W/-rlZP,CAM WIRE 2,01r V 3 V7 7 46 9-70-S49 IF 1, P. F- . 21, cappest TEF-s . . . 1/0. A.S. � Approved: P^Q-n^0-'5 V6, %1/9 7 '9/12/9 7 DATE B, ....... .. . . .......... ui 14 .41, RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, Building Division 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 40py CIT 317 76k Ale- k) f� E C U F\� IL i) iE f Uj 97 HARI 3 PH,2. 20 . A'�, 0 110 R SHOHOMISH CCIUNTY. WASH.; ,DEPUTY_ 8 UIA IN o MAR 2 8 IV DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Reference Grantor(s): (1)z�_,ap,,, ma 1--6gv Additional on pg ....... Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): See e,2_7 - wn ,ovz Rng o V1:5 Qtr OR Lot Blockcm 0-oc) Plat f 74 Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 4<6 00 - 0 OLI jq *)— e6 Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned WI-IEREAS, are the owners of the Irollowing described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit: Property Address: 1.3 _2 6 14' k— ed I'l-f - a-1- 422 Q ,/J Legal Description: Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # (s): �8�o �/- 0 0 0 _' oo;� — oo - 0 V4FEEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. VOL. _ C J 2 8 0 PAGE 0. 6.2 6 RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, Building Division 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to - wit: That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for 'multiple family housing may be erected on subject property containing more than units. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. DATED this day of -7-9) '19 GRANTOR State of Washington )ss County of Snohomish I I I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence'that Brian K Goodnight _ signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was au thorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the grantor - (title) of GOODNITT BROS CONST (name of party., on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the - uses and purposes mentions in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th 19 97 day of. %IWQ ,04NOTARYi.-i PUDUC z % 0 loi7 ....... WAS'�..b or, Wash!ihgton.. commission expires July 311, 1999 11) '0 voL. 9i 2 S2 OPAGEO' 6.2 7 L_,40,�?E5 90 -,-I-)qys CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT [�o 8 9 0 1 3 8 2 6 Address of Construction: 1-41 Property Legal Description (Include all/easements): U F Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. Single Family El Multi -Family (No. of Units—) El Commercial El Public Building Permit No. I ilon into City Right -of -Way: IR No El Yes Vkv. C;F.I%j RW Const ruction Permit No. los other Private Property: 12 No 11 Yes D Ittach legal description and copy of recorded easement EPA I I ce"at I have read pnrdlsh�ll comply with all city requirements as iOqAited on the ba(I of th y Permit Card. J4 Date CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE USE ONLY FOR INSPECTION CALL 7-�, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 30-00 -7 W-01A 31�5 —ri? z_' Permit Fee: — issued By Trunk Charge Date Issued - Assessment Fee: HOUIR Receipt No.: 2 Lid No.: /M 0 Vf, Partial Inspection: Date —Initial — Comments Reason Rejected: Final Inspection Approved: Date Initialu Ft Date —Initial PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE White C opy: File Green Copy: Inspector BufiCopy: Applicant Revised 3/90 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing 9 EASEMENT NO - ---------- --------------------------------- - NEW CONSTRUCTION 0 REPAIRS F� LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER CONTR ACTOR PF.RMIT NO- F&2- 6 ................................................................................................ JOB ADDRESS ............ Oq PWW-0001-11175 (REV.11/78) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . .................................... P-e!;A�t� .... Ao. r% .... eklleal ..... ------------------- NAMEOF ADDITION ............................. ..................................... ................................................... Approved: DATE I? -.311 1 ........................ By ------------------------------------ 11111111111111 15187 21317 76TH AVE W -7 -7-7, —7— City �f Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY'CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number. Lssue Date: 2-6-1 A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 2-1 -7 L tA A a i-- Lx-1-fS z— C) Q3 B. Type of Work (be specific): -_4 C_rLQ r if n Q AJ e-0 7JO A C. Contractor: ---A A )I I X=. Mailing Address: cbm"PAUS StateLicense#: D. Building Permit #(if applicable): 91_�93V&3w Mntact: t ItD hone: 44c) o)S-ei — '90 2, 79:!�R Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit #(if applicable): E. F-1 Commercial El Subdivision n CityProject 0 Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) Multi -Family El SingleFamily Di Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete, Cut Yes []No G. Size of Cut: (am. x H. Chargq�,$ 'APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfrom injuries, damages, or claims ofany kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, includingor notlimitedto the defense ofany legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason ofgranting thispermit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FORA PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCHIS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TOTH E A PPLICA NT Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. RJrr*VV%,r8rr% A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. J U N 2 7 1997 Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. ENGINEERIN"':,, Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trenchwork shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. - I have read the above statements an��un i rstand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be n available on site-,Weall timesfor ins ec n urposes. Signature: Date: CA=77Co n t actor or Ag_e_n47`�--______1 IAL-A-DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK APPROVED BY: TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER lkk 47 DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: X-04 a, 4 4 At %A); e I 14�,004ft'" RIGHT OF WAY FEE: -3 0 DISRUPTION FEF/FUND I 11: v-a_ RESTORATION FEE: 1 -7 T OTAL FEE: RECEIPT NO.: 160*.49 - ISSUEDBY,: 1 49 444 �3—� � - WV NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION 0 YES El NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: PL -F &) -1 w K 7* Cit as 0 Edmon' Y" RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION 72 PERMIT Permit Number. Lssue Date: FLI A-. "Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Type of Work'(be specific): &EY _AQ QJZ= all, PVC-- 70 C. Contractor: -6mmasni sasenk —Contact: Mailing Address: MAW —.Tri Phone: State License #: 15;rJPArzL1&_ 1,016.4 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if apolicable): S ide Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. r_1 Commercial EJ Subdivision E] City Project [] Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG,, 0 WATER) F1 Multi -Family E] Single Family E] Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut of Cut: J�11' A El Yes 0 G. Size x Hi Charge 77— APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY.- Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessftom injuries. damages, or claims ofany kind or description whatsoever, foreseen' or unforeseen, that may be made against the City qf Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorneyfees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCHIS COkPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT Two sets of construction,drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completio"n-'. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public-�,Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior tothe end of the working day; .1 NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be., available on si��A all timesfoyi0spection purposes. I Signature: f of, M,9%0� �Tntractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK * FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BN'- I A k TIME AUTHORIZED: V'OfD AFTER DAY'S RIGHT OF WAY FEE: _Z2, a DISRUPTION FEF/FUND I 11: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE: T OTAL FEE: 00 7— RECEIPT NO.: ISS,UFD,,I3Y NO WORK SHALL. BE,GIN PRIOR T RN IT ISSUANCE Eng, Div 1997 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 11.1 Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: H! 4- .1 -�.- - � � i Diagram CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES El NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Q 1317 -7/,4k AV \/V �--b - 1-7 -7 -TE-A NEW 1419 /� Z,15��L � I 6q7V PE--DEi57,41 31 r7 (N 1-7 w C-D kl� �, ./7,7 -Edmon& /Ci `0 RIGHT-0 -W CTION F AY,, CONSTRU IT PERM 67 /7— 4. 41 Permit Number. I Date: Issue A. Address or Vicinity of Consiru6tion: 21317 76 AV W (9716n5) 8 9 9 C) B. Type of Work (be specific): Install 55' of 1-1/4" MPE IP on 76 AV W from 25' W to East edge of ROW @ 3101 + — N C/L 214 St SW C. Contractor: Puget Sound Energy Contact: Mastaine Kingsbury Mailing Address: 1122 75 St SW Everett Phone: 356-7500 X7596 - State License #: 98203 Liability Insurance: Bond:$ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. [:] Commercial F] Subdivision E] City Project [Z] Utility (PUD, tTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) El Multi -Family 0 Single Family M Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: Yes F]No 3 G. SizeofCut: x H. Aarge $ ?'ILA APP`_L_I__CA_NT T-O- READ A _D_ SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City ofEdmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense ofany legalproceedings includingdefense costs, and attorney fees by reason ofgranting thispermit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIMEA DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO Construction drawing of proposed work required with p ermit application. A 24 hour notice is - required for inspection; Please' call the Engineering Division, 771-0220.JUN 3 0 1997 Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion.. ENGINEERING Restoration is ' to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. Ihave read the above statements and understand thepermit requirements and th.epink copy of thepermit will be available on site at all times for inspectiol purposes. 8ignature: _f_494=_,94& Ir Jzz A!ef-4 e, K 9 ;�t (Co6tract9fdAger1t)' CALL DIAL —A —DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. FOR"CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED VOID AFTER AA) DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND ill: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE: —T76,FF'�c-1 cr PERMIT FEE: TOTAL FEE: COMMENTS: RECEIPT FEE: DATE:'.:__. ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments: Diagram (Fund -111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: FE-FL791 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206� 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 HEARING EXAMINER t FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION. OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICANT: Bruce Goodnight CASE NO.: V 97-40 LOCATION: 21317 76th Avenue West (see Exhibit A, Attachments 1, 2 and 4). APPLICATION: A variance for an 8-foot fence on top of a 2 to 4 foot high retaining wall where the maximum permitted combined fence and retaining wall height of 6 feet is allowed. The requested variance has been proposed to'mitigate potential impacts to the exist) condominium to the south of the proposed development (see Exhibit. A, Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6). REVIEW PROCESS,: Variance; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision. MAJOR ISSUES: a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 17 (FENCE HEIGHT). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20 (VARIANCES). Description of Proposal Application by Bruce Goodnight to install an eight toot high fence along the south property top of a 2 to 4 foot high retaining wall. The proposed fence is intended to mitigate impacts to the existing condominium to the south of the proposed development. The F fence is a requirements placed on the subject property by the ADB as part of its approve D 12 unit multiple family complex (File No. ADB-97-12 1) (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION: Staff Recommendation: Hearing Examiner Decision: Approve with conditions Approve with conditions 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 9 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V-97-40 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and after visiting the site, the Hearing Exa m*iner conducted a public hearing on the application. The hearing on the application was opened at 9:05 a.m., May 1, 1997, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 9:08 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the -hearing is available in the Planning Division. HEARING COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing. From the City: Jeff Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor, entered the staff report into the record and recommended approval of the request with conditions. From the Applicant: Bruce Goodnight, applicant, said he concurred with the conditions and said that the proposed retaining wall and fence will provide privacy for the adjacent neighbors. From the Community: No one from the general public spoke at the hearing. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. Site Description I 1. Site Development And Zoning:. a) Facts: (1) Size: The subject property is 32,228 square feet in area. The proposed fence would be located alongthe south property line (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). (2) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Residential, multiple family, 2.400 square feet of lot area required per dwelling unit (RM 2.4). (3) Existing and Proposed Development: * The site is currently vacant. A single family building was recently moved off the site to allow the construction of a new 12 unit multiple family development. The ADB has granted approval of the design of the new building, and the applicant has applied for building permits. (4) Terrain'and Vegetation: The subject property slopes gently down to the east away from 76th Avenue West, and then slopes down steeply at the eastern end of the property to the adjacent developments. All vegetation has been removed from the site in preparation for construction. The applicant is proposing to redevelop the site with ornamental landscaping around the perimeter of the site (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V-97-40 Page 3 2. Neighboring Development And Zoning: a) Facts: (1) North: Developed with a 12 unit multiple (family dwelling complex. and zoned RM 2.4. (2) South Developed with a 12 unit multiple family dwelling complex. and zoned RM 2.4. (3) East: Developed with a large multiple family dwelling complex and zoned CG under a contract rezone. (4) West: Currently under constructiol I with a new high school. and zoned Public Use (P). b) Conclusion:The proposed development would be consistent with the surrounding zoning and development. B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance 1. Compliance with RM 2.4 2. Zoning Standards a) Facts: (1) The fundamental site development standards in a RM 2.4 zone are set forth in Chapter 16.30. (2) The proposed building and site development conforms to all R.M 2.4 requirements. (3) ECDC Chapter 17.30 states the standards by which fences may be developed, including height. The standards from which the applicant is requesting relief are: "Unless a variance isfirst obtained nofence or hedge shall be more than 6jeet in height as measuredfrom the top of thefence to the lowest original grade "(ECDC 17.30.000(Q). and "When a retaining wall treefeet orgreateris contiguous to and below aproposed fence, the proposedjence may be constructedfor the purposes of safety not greater thanfourfeet above the top of the retaining wall or thefinisihed grade, whichever is less. " (ECDC 17.30.000(D)). b) Conclusion: As conditioned the proposal complies with the development standards for RM 2.4 zones as set forth in Chapter 16.30 and 17.30 except the standard for which the applicant is seeking a variance. Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V-97-40 Page 4 3. Compliance with requirement for a Variance ECDC Chapter 20.85 (Variances) states an applicant may request a variance from the standards of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC Chapter 20.85. Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC also sets forth the mechanism whereby a provision of' the Code may be varied on a case -by -case basis if the application of the provision would result in an unusual and unreasonable hardship (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2). a), Facts: (1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which a variance request must comply in order to he granted by the Hearing Examiner. These criteria include: a special circumstance must exist; no special privilege is granted. the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code; the proposal will not be detrimental and is the minimum necessary. (2) Variances may be used to modify bulk standards. They may not be used to, modify use or procedural requirements. (3) The applicant states that special circumstances exist due to the adjacent development. "The proposed Rose Ridge Condominiums are situated between two existing condominium projects. The adjacent Rose Pointe Condominiums are to the north with the rear yards facing the site. The adjacent Stratford Square Condominiums are to the. south with their rear yards facing the proposed project. The proposedJence is to buffer the impact of the two adjacent rear yards. that of the proposed Rose Ridge, and the adjacent Stratford Square Condominiums. as required I—v the ADB. (4) The applicant states that the proposal would not he a grant of special privilege as other fence. height variances have been- granted by the City of Edmonds, for buffering adjacent properties. Many of the other sites which used taller fences to buffer impacts are buffering commercial impacts from existing multiple family developments. These sites include the Top Foods site and the Funtasia site. One case where an impact from a new Multiple Family project was buffeted from an existing Multiple Family site was at the Cottage Crest Condominiums on 196th Street Southwest. (5) The applicant states that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and by developing multiple family while protecting privacy. (6) The applicant states that the proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance as the applicant is developing twelve units where the zoning allows twelve units. (7) The applicant states that the proposal will not be detrimental as the fence was required by the ADB to mitigate privacy reduction impact. Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V-97-40- Page 5 (8) The applicant states that this is the minimum variance because, based on testimony by adjacent property owners, the ADB recommended that the height of the fence be allowed to be eight feet along the southern property line. (9) The proposed design has been approved by the ADB with the condition that the applicant obtain a variance to allow the proposed fence height (file No. ADB-96121 ) (see Exhibit A, Attachment 6). b) Conclusions: (1) Special Circumstances Special circumstances include the size. shape, topography, location or surroundings of the property and public necessity for public structures. Special circumstances exist for this proposal due to the location or surrounding.. of the property. Specifically. the condominium project to the north is oriented. with the drive aisle on the north side and the backyards on the south side, while the condominium project on the south is oriented with the drive aisle on the south side and the backyards on the north side. This requires the backyards of the proposed project to face the backyards of an existing project. (2) Special Privilege It does not appear that any special privilege will be demonstrated in granting'this variance as other fence height variances have been granted by the City of Edmonds for buffering adjacent properties. (3) Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the development of the site in a manner consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan designation of the site while preserving privacy of adjacent properties. - (4) Not Detrimental Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health. safety or welfare because the proposal is intended to reduce detrimental impacts. (5) Minimum Required The request is the minimum necessary to reduce the possible impacts of tile proposal on adjacent properties. Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V-97-40 Page 6 C. Technical Committee 1. Engineering Division Comments a) Fact: The Engineering Division has commented that the height of the fence. adjacent to 76th Avenue West must not he allowed at a height which would create a vehicle sight obstruction for vehicles entering and exiting 76th Avenue West. b) Conclusion: A condition should be incorporated into the decision stating that the applicant must obtain a building permit for the proposed fence, and that the fence must comply with the regulations of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division with respect to vehicle sight distance. 2. Other Comments a) Fact: No other City Divisions or Departments submitted comments. D. Critical Areas Ordinance 1. Facts: a) The subject proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.1 SB (Critical Areas Ordinance). b) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist, and the City has issued a Waiver from the requirement to prepare a Critical Areas Study (File No CA-96-21 1) 2. Conclusion: The applicant has complied with the requirements of the ECDC Chapter 20.15B. DECISION Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a variance is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. This variance is to allow the proposal in the location identified on the proposed site plan (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). Any other structures, additions or remodels would have to conform with the typical setbacks or height requirements for the zone or the applicant/property owner would be required to obtain an additional -variance. 2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code. It is the responsibility. of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 3. The applicant must obtaining a building permit for the proposed fence. Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V-97-40 Page 7 4. The fence must comply with the regulations of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division pertaining to vehicle site distance obstruction. 5. The permit is transferable. Entered this 9th day of May, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds. �on McConn—ell Hearing Examiner RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Section 20.100.010.G allows for' the Hearing, Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is,the- subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. APPEALS Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Exam in& decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The* appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the decision being appealed. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.' 2 Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V-97-40 Page 8 NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in.the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office. EXHIBIT: The following exhibit was offered and entered into the record. A. Planning Division Advisory Report PARTIES OF RECORD: Bruce Goodnight Goodnight Brothers Construction P.O. Box 669 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds Planning Division Edmonds Public Works Division Edmonds Engineering Division Edmonds Parks & Recreation Division Edmonds Fire Department p ROJECT -REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME.-,.� �g�wq CHECK A /*. PROJECT ADDREts' 7' RECEIPT D ATE."A) - Dal .... ... ....... COU -IBLUG SEWER TRE ENG IL a' 1; 101- a N f I m a m I M 1, Conditional Use Permit � ME ADB, Rejuirements IMM Cther Zoning Requirements 'ry MEMO- 70, IM � � �` IWORMUTOT-ml M M m K41", I Ell IM I WINE I mm m m & *U;M MTF .IMMMMM M. 11110, MMEN M=ffl; Tree Cutting Plan . mll _4, DDYTToMiMMILT MCMEM311p 4"! Tommom brain -age Plan (On-Siterk, �Setback - Storm Drain Linti(,' 'Ope—n Ditch - Existing Culvert Required Culvert Size Mal ME M MM re FTA A MEN Calt—ch Basin Required ON, Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access I � Mr I I MM cl mm mwl;. m m Sidewalk -Required Curb & Gutter Required qTm;r#Tao 'Street Paving Required timblayoZor. murrm. [street Name Sign Required Other Signing Required �= �0 FERCA—Map Check/Water Table Side *Sewer Availability m®r, lopwm�- �M ZME I Ul f -714 Create Street File �Existing Water Main Size MMM affiffl RM 1!-!W/l ill I'M: �Nll Mr, in Water Meter Size U Service Line Size IVA 'Water Meter Charge Required �Hydrant-Required iHydrant Size Existing -MMUM, ORION MWI A 7M �Mm MT. M �Mm I i W11611 ME INA 'A I AM �� Em Miscellaneous Reviewed By: FIRE PLANNING J AA ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS UBUMORKS DEpj PERAUT"PLICATIONREQUIREM12M o: Applicant rom: Jamal Mahmoud� Engineering Inspector ?— g-0 wner-. 6j:;, Plan Chc& No: 9 fit Adress: 13 Date: fter review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met Construction hours am: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.AL-10:00 P-1VL;WEEKENDS1HOLIDAYS — 10:00 A.M.-6:00 PbL A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is reTiked for all work on public property. (ECDC 1&60) Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior tapermit issuance. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 1830.030d). NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAM OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED D96PfAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED A14D INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 1&30) INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFU.LMG. (ECDC 18.30) Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 1&90) Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to 2-0 -%. . (ECDC 18.80.060D) Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-O&WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18-30) No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department' Connection to City water syrem is required. There is a sepatzte charge.for the water meter (ECD.0 7.20).. A back water valve is required if downstaiis plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) Connection th City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required. LID# Fees paid: Yes No ChargeL— 55 (ECDC 18.10) Underground whing is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 5001* of the total assessed value of the structure. (EcDc 1&go) A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTI I NG OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18SO) dTAPPDW M I I I — -w 0 r W- A �7 z 'But L.-O&OC I STRUT FILE - MAR 17 lg,.q7z PERIWIrCoUt4r 0 1000e Z4 soo. r &m 46 + kV. 2-:!�,r AaS = IWE L46F- t ZCA 5- epcol�- 8 MW P—LXE pexto A" Pi, x lb4r- gir A&V At- - ik;� 41-5244 44,T-t- 4jo,zr+,6AI. - 412..Szs' 41Z-.975'+ Z5z 4157.8 75�+S- apoC- 44ZS15r mox RQ�r AtVOL- PI.& AB3.76- Art4—F A4.7C fteTUAL� 4o7.:!r*4il.w+ 4o'6,79-t 4o4- ��4c4,,'75 kaACf .4a,)5+ 257�: 431. 7 6". --ir-s- 'Zoc .43L.-6 rn" V4bc4i AdA-'I>PL lkd�. 4a.5' RM'qf- AMoftL_- 4.,2 C. 1 wq'� CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 * (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works * Planning 9 Parks and Recreation * Engineering March 31, 1997 IL� STREET FILE 5 IZ cl 7 Del Erickson, P.E. 15020 S.E. 46th St. Bellevue, WA 98006 Subject: Proposed 12 Unit Development 21217 - 76th Ave. W. (AD13-96-11M Dear Mr. Erickson, The Engineering Division is not able to adequately review the submitted plans because the storm calculations do not conform to SCS methodology as required in the attached Ordinance No. 3013. Please revise the calculations and the plans accordingly so that review of the project can take place. The Engineering Division is withholding comments on any other issues until the revisions are received. When the revisions are completed, please resubmit four sets of plans, along with a set of the revised calculations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact Don Fiene at 771-0220, extension 323. Sincerely, James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer GCH/JCW1sf Enclosures cc: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator A96121.DOC * Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan t-N,4 .......... r I 0, 10, APO Y ; `�bU diii cit 6Ad E s 7� 7, 0 1 -k!' 7. , reas,:*:" e KIIS*V�� -0 j, A '31 e Cridcal Aie: Ch66klisi- on tit-IdMeCity. Ile City Wilf this form is to -be fin ' W out by any person:,.". d146 ale� make a preqmrso7 site'--, le e� Prq)aring,A.D j!er an th p�eqt I i bf e Applicadon.for the City of Ednfofids- 'ttl*'11606ssary to complete a prior S to his/her submittal of -a d perinit 2ppl icati o6n.-_ permit to thd City.* Mith a signed c orm thje� The _, Vy of this f 91 ___ Should also submi t a !� �nity map - purpose of -the -Checklist -is- to -enable-- City t1taff to detern�ie-whi::ther-2ny-- vidual Rr plot plan indi lots of the �_l ial CriticaIL4=as airiie.*ormay potenti *ith cfi6�',deiail that City staff can find 'L�Iand present on the subj idenfif _;Site, y dij informati6a, 61,W-pomplelk the.:. 1 17" addition, Shan i Checklist should be easily. available -M 'otherperhinent inEtTiation (e-g; ettei bbsffv�afiOns of the site or d4a'6�"w 1i p t0P09V3 iltip,- . 1 -1 lii� " phy etc.) or stuTtes in City Hall qc�!� inventories rN A. _1= ?4C6ii11iktioii1- V�ith or sdil prerttnidiiy of the site. er -assessment X)Z _0.i An applicanti-or high iepie�m'-tative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it'. M I have completed- the attachdd'Ciijia—A- rea, Che6kiist-and attest that the answers provided are A facttial, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the Wropiiate column b6low)." ... ... Owner I Applicant: ---" - - ------- ca t Re resentative: A n V wo, Name 77 S Address Stred Address City, State, ZIP P ne ty, State ZIP Signa ture D t a e igna re tu ate'�,J�r D .41- iF Ij_ ritiCaF'Aie'as'Cfi6c'kdist r N111 -4,Wl /V ti r -S ite infoi niafi�nlsdi 9 Y, yyr I n3 A PO raoh' /h d I Site Addi on: 2 Pr4Dperty Tax Account Nufiiber: A24 -M -W7. 00' tYo. A A. .3.- Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4 4. Is this site currently developpd? --&-yes; no.' U If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the generai site topography. Check all that iappl�- Flat less than 54 elerflele'Vation charge over entire site. %: Rolling: slopes on site geq�.less than 15% vertical. jise of- h,[F,n,4tQ-�ZT 10-feet 0 ontal 0' f 'W 1? 1. Ln Hi cilv illy' Slopes Present on site of more than 15% and less-4han 46%' of I 04eetover a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet)3 'I( % 54j; TJ�111 .7.1__'�'. Steep: grades of greater than'30% present on site �eiet c�:'n-':srie'-' of '1'014'-a!"' , oTe horizontaJ distance of less than 33-feet). -6be): Other. (please desL f 6. Site contains areas of jear-rou s jpg.w;t� nd tafid" Approx Mo ..Depth: 7. Site 11��Xi ns ai eas of seasQ sta ming ,Aer nal Approx,.'-Depth %; What seasqn(s) of the yea'02'. 8. Site is,i' the flood way "plain of a water course. 9. Site'6nitains'a creek or an 211a where water flows across the grounds surfaceT Flows; aire'�'year- N6 :-'Flo' rou�d? ws are seasonal? (What time of year? 10. Site is primarily: forested -meadow shrubs X_ mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: For City Staff Use Only L Site ii Zoned? 2. kS rnapped soil type(s)? 3. Wedaad invent . ory or C.A. map indicates wetlaiid-present on site? A110 4;.,-. :-..Critical Areas.inventory of C.A. xnap indicates Critical Area on site? -Si- d*esign6�d earth subsidence landslide hazard area? 5.. te wi 6. desiiignated on the Environrnentally,S�e,��e�s Mae- ":J 'I. -STUDY REQUIRED CONDITIONAL WAIVEk, -.W IVER A Reviewed by:"-' a D te A -F f-C.AV MAR -.1 3 1997 UNTER 00MIT.00.1 ja RECORDED- Buildin' Division Ciq of 9 V O;Sth'-Avinue North 14 Edmonds;'WA 98020 Reference N: 97 MAR 13 PM;2: 20 AUDITOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASH.' .DEPUTY-- DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BU110INe MAR 2 8 1997 Grantor(s): (1)-Z Additional on p Grantee(s):— City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec -7 - -d &/ Twn Rug 0 VZ tr OR Lot -e Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) *Irg V- 1000 - 00 > Assessor's Tax Parcel 1D# not yet assigned WHEREAS, OZW60 ' - 40 6 W -,0V / 0-* L/ are the owners of the flollowing described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit: Property Address: Legal Description: zok�� > Assessor's Tax Parcel ID N (s): WHEREAS9 the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said premises in co, mpliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. VOL- 3 2 8 0 PABE 0 6 2 G. A�K,:4 �711711111NADDIIESS: GO of Edmonds, Building Division '250 5th'Avenue' North Edmon:ds'. WA 98020' WITNESSE11L that for and in consideration of the premises, the above- named -owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to - wit: That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on subject property containing more than — - Z-9 units. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. DATED this day of _ - 9 1� '19 GRANTOR State of Washington )ss County of Snohomish I I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Brim K Goodnight _ signed this instrument, on oath stated that helshe was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the grantor (title) of GOODNIGHT BROS CONST (name of party on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purpses mentions in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th day of -.,site A- __119 97 I f, "Ar, , 44 kP Slow'* NOTARY N o t It _J>ddiZ1Land_fiW1heSt7g_�0f Was_h11;i A�on. PU13UG J-F -V f .0 40 ��01'23 ^y commission expires July 31, 1999 J4 VOL. 3280PAsEOG27 97031302-85 PLANNING DATA SITE ADDRESS:-21313,15,17 76th Avwe W DATE: 3/27/97 ZONING: RM 2.4 PLAN CHK#: 97-80 ADB # 96-121 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 12 unit Multiple Family Building SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: 15 Left Side: 10 Right Side: 10 Rear: 15 Actual Setbacks: . I Front: P-7 Left Side: /0 Right Side: Rear: e27/f CORNER LOT no (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED NO (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: 45% Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: Z; - 9— ?/- A Maximum Allowed: 25 + 5'for a 4:12 roof Actual Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: SUBDIVISION / LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT: No CRITIC AL AREAS #: (UAI& SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS w/ADB, appeal exp 12/10196 LOT AREA: 1'2-Z DENSITY ALLOWED I per 2,400 s.f. UNITS ALLOWED 13 PROPOSED 12 BONDING REQUIRED (ys/no)-yp�s .(for what?) Landscaping--$ 2- OTHER: ---C Plan Review By: OEOrrECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 FAX 747-8561 Goodnight Brothers Construction P.O. Box 669 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Brian Goodnight r77 - -T APR 0 1 1997 PERMIT COUNTER Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Considerations Proposed Rose Ridge Condominiums 21317 - 76th Avenue West Edmond, Washington Dear Mr. Goodnight: 7f-- � March 31, 1997 JN 97115 On March 28, 1997, a geotechnical engineer from our office visited the site of the proposed Rose Ridge Condominiums at 21317 - 76th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of this visit was to explore site subsurface conditions and to provide recommendations for foundation design. The recommendations and conclusion presented in this report are professional opinions based on the visual observations made during our site visit and on previous experience with other projects in the vicinity. We understand that you propose to construct three multi -unit buildings, totaling 12 units, on the project site. The two westernmost building will have wood framed floors constructed over a crawl space. The easternmost structure will have a daylight basement. The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating four test pits in or near the proposed building footprints. The test pits were excavated on March 28, 1997, with a trackhoe provided by the client. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process and logged the test pits. The test pit logs are maintained in our files and are available upon request. The site has been cleared and most of the topsoil removed. The soils at the test pit locations generally consist of one to three feet of loose to medium -dense reddish -brown silty sand with some gravel and roots, overlying several feet of medium -dense to dense gravelly sand. The gravelly sand is underlain by dense to very dense glacial till soils consisting of gray silty sand with gravel to a maximum explored depth of eight feet. No groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. It is possible that perched groundwater could be found between the near -surface weathered soil and the underlying dense glacial till. A A A I Goodnight Brothers Construction March 31, 1997 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JN 97115 Page 2 Based on the observations made during our site Visit, it appears that construction of the three condominium buildings is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The structures can be supported on conventional foundations that bear on competent native soils underlying the site. The proposed buildings can be supported on conventional footings bearing directly on medium - dense to dense native gravelly sand or the dense to very dense glacial till soils. These soils were encountered at about 1 to 3 feet in the test pits. Continuous and isolated footings should have minimum widths of 12 inches and 16 inches, respectively. The footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). A.one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils will be about one-half inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil. We recommend using an allowable coefficient of friction equal to 0.40 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our site visit. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those anticipated, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Goodnight Brothers Construction and its representAtives for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed and on previous experience with sites that have similar observed conditions. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the limited scope of our services. No warranty is expressed or implied. We trust that this report meets your immediate needs for the proposed development. Please contact us, if we can be of further service. Goodnight Brothers Construction March 31, 1997 Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. F, R T 29740 IST NAL, I EXPIRES (D -U--1 7 1 D. Robert Ward, P.E. Associate DRW:mmm JN 97115 Page 3 9 0 . 1 9 City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: Issue Date: /0 -C�o - 5? —7 6—P A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: CAI B. Type of Work (be specific) . Co t: C. Contractor: CWW� Intac Mailing Address: CXAI�\ VkQ"-( Phone: 6-70- State License #: C:0MQQ0S uA 9bfj-�,�o Liability Insurance: 0 IF bc P1 Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. F� Commercial El Subdivision El City Project Y Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) Multi -Family Single Family F1 Other x % - INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut es E]No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge$ OoKy APPLICANT TO READ A GPN INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to Id e City of Edmonds harmIes1,4,—,,(i,,We' ;-,Zq�ages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made againsphe Ci ry of Edmonds, or a�y of its departments or. employ- ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense corsiR';-�n4,�11 ey fees by reason of dr4titini'this perinir-? '�M THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC77ON AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ES77MAYED RESTORA77ONFEES WILL BE HELD UN77L THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY C17Y FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED Fb-R)7§sqANcE TO THE APPLICANT,, Construction drawing of proposed work required wito.perpit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the EAgideering Departme Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. 771-00220 Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Enginter. 4, '� "'74 All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved matA U119 4 wo r to the end of iyirfg�day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy.of the permit will be available 11 - fi - On site at a LLitnes o nspe on (IN ) Signaturekxl= N:L Date: (Contractor or Ag 'Pit CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ....... ...... .... .. FOR CITY USE ONLY . . ........ IT :RIG�.:OF- WAY DEP.0.S APPROVIED:1BY' ....... 1.11,11, ... ...... ........ ........ 1.1.1111.1 ............. .............. TIME:AUTHORIZED-: YOID DAYS. DISRUPTION-FEE/FUNDJ4 1- ...... ................. . . .............. r........... ... ..... . ............ - ........... ........ . ..... - ........ ...... ............. -1-.11- ...... M WORK SHALL BEGIN Engrg. Div. 1991 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund I I I Route copy to Street Tdliept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION 0 YES 0 NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: I M Eng. Div. Jul: NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and,may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on this map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER Call PRospect 6-1107 when work —WATER-SEWER DEPARTMENT is ready for inspection. (NO jnspe'L'� SIDESEWER PERMIT MORs Saturday, Sunday or holidays.) N2 1091 ADDRESS ............. 7Q!..- _.$qmth .............................................................................................................................. OWNER ........ Kj.CkP,_y ... 1193_Mpn . . ................................................... CONTRACTOR ..... W.jj).&f ;Le ... 9 _T) ............... Permission is granted __ ----- Juna..2.4 ...... .......... 19.64., for ...................... days, to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer with City Sewers in ace'ordance with aPP11cation on file and governing ordinances. ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: NOTE No. I —The owners of the Property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor ust be employed to construct side sewer in street area_ Do not cover any Portion of sewer before it has been M 7E No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you ge inspected. E No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches Inside property line; t permit. No bends In grade sharper than % will be permitted. minimum grade of 2%. NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be res I ible for failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. NOTE No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than Is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer� or Its ap- Purtenances except to Insert the pipe into the wye. 16N, 8TREET FILE ��,,CARD r //Y, Edinondi:' -PERMIT EASE NT No . ......... .. . ....... .... OUTSI E R�SIDE 0 REP 1A AIRS 0 /L-- .7 OWNER'-r ... .. ......... ............ /10. a mm. 6, ........ ... ......... CONTRACTOR ..... - 7-4 . ....... . . . .... ... ................... ................. �PERMIT No \ 770 STREET ................................................. .................. .......... HOUSE �2-6- ........ ... ......... AVENUE LOT No . ...... ................... ..................... ............................. BLOCK' Nio'l�'....... o . ..... 4 ive, NAME ADD .... . . ........ -j— ....... ........... ... .... ... CPI Jt 74 APPROVEDI-,'��l 1964 Date Approved: BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ........ ....... ........................... DEPOSIT, ............... ...................................... SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ............ ................................... DATE. REVISION No. 2 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR 1=11 -1:Z C)o IP C)o 0 P-1 ID I Jrk- 3P 'A, EZ Ir M IE w Ir 0 21313-17 715-LI-i 600-v� . �v ( VJ L FXPfRES I I 0ow April. 1997 Applicant: Goodnight Brothers Const'. P.O. Box 669- Edmonds, WA. 98020 Tel: 517-4961 Engineer: Del Erickson, P.E. 15020 S.E. 46th St. Bellevue, Wa. 98006 Tel: 747-5825 Wlk]RIRPL!r T N7 IE DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS: Attached hereto is a copy of the Off -Site Analysis prepared in December of 1995 by Land Development Consultants for the Rose Pointe Condos (parcel lying immediately north of the subject site). The downstream system for the subject project is identical to that described in the attached Off -Site analysis. OFF -SITE DRAINAGE: Contours generally fall across the property from the west to the east and southeast. No off -site runoff enters the subject parcel. It is bounded on the north by the Rose Pointe Condos whose storm drainage system collects and contains all runoff falling on that property. It is bounded on the west by 76th Avenue West which has curb and gutter, preventing any street runoff from entering the property. No runoff enters from the south or east as contours fall away from the site in those directions. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROLS: Runoff from the parcel is directed to an existing piped storm system bordering the subject property along its east property line. This piped system carries the site runoff to an ultimate discharge into Hall Creek. Storm water quantity controls for sites less than one acre in size, and discharging to a stream have been utilized for the subject site. Water quality control is not required as the site has only 2 outside parking stalls. Water quantity control will be provided by a buried 84 inch diameter detention pipe and outlet control system designed to limit the peak rate of runoff to the pre -developed condition two-year, twenty-four hour design storm, while maintaining the pre -developed condition peak runoff rate for the ten-year twenty-four hour and one - hundred year, twenty-four hour storms. OFF -SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS PREPARED IN DECEMBER 1995 BY LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS FOR THE ROSE"POINTE CONDOS WHICH BORDER THE SUBJECT PARCEL ALONG ITS NORTH PROPERTY LINE. THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN THIS ANALYSIS THE THE SAME SYSTEM TO,WHICH WE WILL BE DISCHARGING OUR DETAINED STORMWATER'RUNOFF. DOWN-STREAM.DRAINAGE The off -site drainage down -stream from the property is shown in Figure 3. Surface water leaves* the subject property through the existing catch. basin'(station 0+00) located and the southeast corner of the subject property. The drainage flow then continues traveling south about 240 feet through an 112" storm drain to another catch basin on 214th St. SVY (sts. 3+40). The drainage flow then travels east along 214th St. SW through 12" storm drains and five catch basinsto 73rd P1. W. (sta. 5+11). The drainage flow then travels south along 73rd Pl, W. through 12" storm drains and five catch basins to 216th St. SW (sta. 10+30). . The drainage flow then travels east along 216th St. SW through a 24" storm drain to station 13+20 and the end of the required path analysis� From this point the storm drains appear to continue easterly crossing State Route 99 and out of the Edmonds City Limits. All the downstream drainage -facilities appeared to be, functiorling adequately. No significant sedimentation, erosion or ' flooding problems were observed in the down- stream drainage course. De�volopment of the subject project will not permanently increase the sedimentation, erosion or flooding in the down -stream drainage courses. UY:U9A BkULA'. L'OUDNIGH'i hpP 19' 197 0-1:56 LAND DE(JELOPMENT CONSULT ANTS 206-672-7837 2064818785 TO: ID . 02 206 672 -6837 P02 ME C) 1* L;;l ty C�, it dpl- fA t 0 ft, I * NW-13 A ril *3AV 'Pualt Ila! A I $ I f!vfg vjl t N. 7 w q%rA 44F Al ,j p -51 A a �T h -ZA lu If I!t iqv. AA -qlt If 4 OIL' E F I J4 IN 4111 lb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. Z4 y I Coo - r7 All 0 "'t l4, ct C."! ell 17 1 d 01 1 0.1 VJ I _k� J+l I to t .4 J ifAl-, rwp; lit, F, I V11 Ui .74, , , iv, Wi`f Tit 0 1-:." j U ;X 61, 3T. v�. M, [A it ;iT �j 41, 4Y.- J - UZI 6.1 1, � 7717� I El "J" )Ylk lc� fk it it M f4 it. Kill N1�IaYO 7. j,;; it U,f" I'K Ntij .1� if -IQ ;41T, m il fit V 'i f'. w lu It U ty L—f JA 'I A 'KI NTIM lit 10" "A A OV STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN Table 111-1.3 SCS Western Washington Runoff Curve Numbers (Publiihod by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Tyj!e 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. LAND USE DESCRIPTION CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A 'B C D cUltiVatod iind(l)i :winter condition 86 91 ..94 95 kbilntiih opin.areasi low qrowing�brush grasslands 74 82, 89 92 ReAd'oW bt pikituirei 65 78 85 89 0dod or for4ii lAndt undisturbed 42 64 76 81 ,!l0q or fordiilinds young siioind growth or brush 55 72 81 86 orchard': with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open 6pAcenj lawns, parks, golf courseg, cemeteries, landscaping .1 Good conditions grass cover on 05% of the 68 80 86 90 0kir conditions r a cover on 50-75% of ;r:: 77 85 90 92 the area, dr*0ei toads & parking lotat .7.6 es 89 91 :biiri roads parking lotsi 72' 82 87 89 'tinpit4ioub.surface9i pavement', roof 6 etd'i�;, 98 98 98 98 -Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds etc. 100 100 100 100 Sihgl6 family residential(2)- DW6illng Unit/Gross Acre %Impervious.(3) separate curve number 1;0 DU/dA is shall'be selected for IiS DU/GA 20 pervious & impervious 240 DU/GA 25 portions of the site 2z5 DU/GA 30 or basin 3.0 DU/GA 34 3.5 bU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA -.42, 4.S DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 t.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Oub's) condoni.apartments, %impervious comercial businesses must be inddetrLil groin computed (1) -For a more detailed description of agricultural land.use curve numbers toter to National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology,' Chapter 9# August 1972. .(2) Assumes roof and drive ' way runoff is directed into otiset/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbersi FEBRUARY, 1992 STOPMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN i4her's i Ti travel time (minutes) L = flow length (fast) V = average velocity (feet/sac) and 60 si conversion factor from seconds to minutes of concentration (T.) in the aum of Tt values for the various conbecut ive flow T, Tt + Tt + T1 1 2 M where I Tj time of concentration (minutes) and number of flow segments m bhifti flow In flow over plane surfaces. it usually occurs in the headwater of fiiirbamio With sheet flow, the friction value (n,) (a modified Manning's effective roughness coefficient that includes the effect of raindrop impactl drag over the 01kne burfacej obstacles ouch an litteri crop ridges and rocksi and'sid6ion and .,transportation of sediment) is used. These n, values are for very shallow flow depihs of about 0.1 foot and are -only used for travel lengths up to 300 feet. Table ill-i.4 gives'Manning's n. values for sheet flow for various surface conditions. J. For sheet flow of up to 300 feati-ijoe Manning's kinematic solution to directly Compute Tt. Tt 0 A, -Q —.4 Z--Qp.L V , whore t Tj no L P2 Be K3 M. WA (.p2) travel time (min), sheet flow Manning's effective roughness coefficient (from Table 111-1.4). flow length (ft), 2-year, 24-hdur rainfall (in), and slope of hydraulic grade line (land slope, ft/ft) A commonly used method of computing average velocity of flowj once It has measurable depth, in the following equation: where t k V velocity (ft/8) k time of,concentration velocity factor (ft/o) no slope of flow path (ft/ft) ."k" is computed for various land covers and channel characteristic's.with assumptions made for hydraulic radius using the following rearrangement of Manning's equationt k (1. 49 (R)0.667) /n R. an assumed hydraulic radius n Hnnningla roughness coefficient for open channel flow 111-1"14 FEBRUARYj 19972 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND'BASIN Table 111-1A "n" AND "k" Values Used in Time Calculations for Hydrographe iin,* Sheet Flow Equation Manning's Values (for the initial 300 fti of travel) n. .-amoorn surzaces (concrete, aspnaLt, gravel, or bare hand packed Pillow fields or 10606 Boll surface (no residue) 9.05 cdItLirated Moil with residue cover (as-0.20 ft/ft) 0.06 dditivkted Moil with residue cover.(o> 0.20 ft/ft) 0.17 '.4hort.1prairio grass and lawns 0.15 6rislie grasses .0,24 :,-06k*UAa grass 0.41 Range (na�urali 0.13 06=1,6e toidit with light underbrush 0.40 Ikoodti or forest with donee underbrush 0.80 *Manning values fo hoot flow only, from Overton and Meadows 1976 (See TR-55, 199V) "k" Values Used in Travel Time/Time of Concentration Calculations Shallow Concentrated Flow (After the initial 300 ft. of sheet.flow, R -'0.1) ka 1; Forest wIth hei—vigrouna lItter and meadows (n - 0.10) 3 2; Brushy ground with some tress (n - 0.060) 5 J. Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation (n - 0.040) 8 A; High grand (n - 0.035) 9 -Si Short grass, pasture and lawns (n 0.030) 11 6o Nearly bare ground (n 0.25) 13 76 Paved and gravel Areas (n - 0.012) 27 thannel Flow (intermittent) jAt the beg�.hning of visible channels R 0.2), ke I. Forested swale with heavy ground -litter (n 0.10) 2. Forested drainage course/ravine with defined channel bed (n O�050) 10 3. Rock -lined waterway (n - 0.035) is 4; grassed waterway (n - 0.030) 17 S. Earth-iined waterway (n —.0.025) 20 6; - CHP pipe (n - 0.024) 21 1� Concrete pipe (0.012) 42 ei other waterways and pipe 0.508/n channel Flow (Continuous stream R - 0.4) ke 9i HeanderIng stream with some poole.(n - 0.040.L 20 l0i Rock -lined stream (n 0.035) 23 11. Grass -lined stream (n 0.030) 27 12.. Other streamo, man-made channelb and pipe 0.807/n** .1 111-1-16 FEBRUARY, 1991 0 STORHWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE OUGET SOUND BASIN Table 111-1.6 Hydrologic Sail Groups foot Soils In the Pullet Sound Basin Soil Type Hydrologic Soil Group Soil Type Hydrologic Soil Group Agnew C Colter C Ahl 9 Custer ND Alto C Dabob ND Aiderwood C Delphi D Arents, Alderwood 9 Dick "D Annui lavirm B [Nnut D AAW 8 Dupont D 8 Feltner" C C Edgworick C Pid . .. . B Elwell C Paquatmet Bellingham D Everett A Bellingham variant C Everson 0 Motfbrt 8 OsIvIn D now 0 Getcholl litriscot D Giles Bucktsy� C Godfrey D, Dunker R Ofee"Wetat A Cagey C Grove C C9111AKWlt No Horstins C Casey ND Horwt ND Cossolary C 11611 ND Cathcart a Hokb ND Cerstralla 8 Hoodspoil ND Chehfilli a Hoolldst C Chesser A floypill ND CInebm# g Hual ND Claliam C hwilanolls ND Clayton Jome Coosw beaches yorioble Jumpe, ND KSPV"n CrD lubloch C RAO& C ROB160 D KlIchlo C Republic Kitsof C Riverwesh variable Klaus Hn Rober C Klone ND SAW C Late$ C Sallrum B Lebom 8 Somnuntish D ND Son Juan "D Lynnwood ND Scamnan D Lydair "D Schneider Mat C Seattle Manley B Sekiu ND Mashel 9 Semkhmm D Mayumn C Shatter D McKenna D Shinn B mcmu"my, "D Shelton C Melbounme a Sl C Menzel ND Sinclair C Mixed -Miuviai variable SkIpops D Met"" 8 Skyltornish B Muklheo C/D Snahopish ND "off B SnohotWsh D N A Soldue a Z11"o m1i ND Sollelto ND mellto," A Spans D FEBRUARY, 1992 Soil survey ca ac 3t low, Effective rooting depth Is 20 to 40 M6 daif. un, f 494apid, and the hazard of water ero 719, 1, . ;*, , sion .1 seasonal perched water table Is at a depth of. 'jidjtd�36 lnbhes from January to March. Springs or seep groag aft) common. ft,"l-Tho Everett soil Is Very deep and somewhat f bx6ebsively drained. It formed In glacial outwash. Typically, the sUdace layer, where mixed to a depth of i ibbUt 6 inches, Is Very dark grayish brown gravelly sandy "I''166WThe subsoil Is dark brown very gravelly sandy loam -� '&b6Ut 112 Inch6i thick. The, upper part of the substratum "Ild bho0idVery §raVelly loamy sand about 5 Inches thick. thi lb*ef part. 'to A depth of 60 Inches or more Is dark dMienifidly ora4ly sand. 00noibultV. df the Everett soil Is rapid. Avallabl& water 19 , 16#11, Effective rooting depth Is 60- Inches or uhoft l0apid, and the hazard of water erosion Is his Unit Is used niainly as woodland and for wildlife It Is also used for urban development. i,oll ibUglas-fir Is the main woodland species' -on the ��`Alddfwood soil. On the basis of a 100-year site curve, th K 1 0 mean site index Is 142. On the basis of a 50-year curva� the mean'site Index Is 108. The mean annual hd6inent at culmination (CMAI) for Douglas -fir at age.65 .Ali ke cubic feet per acre. !I b6Uglas-fir Is the main woodland species on the 46r6tt soil. On the basis of a I 00-year site curve, 8. th'166A site Index Is i4l. On the basis of t t a 50-year sJ t i �.#rvo the mean site Index Is I 11. The mean annua,� ?"Ificibment at culmination (CMAQ for Douglas -fir at age 65 6ublc leei per acre. Among the trees of limited extent on this'unit are �"Westefti hemi6ck, Western redcedar, and red alder. A 'on ' the cortimon forest understory plants are salal, m g evergreen huckleberry, brackenfern, red huckleberry, common rosei and. Oregon -grape. -The main limitation for the harvesting of timber is steepness of slope. Slope restricts the use of wheeled and tracked equipment In skidding operations; cable !nN systems generally are safer and disturb the soils il atd lass. arVestIn§ systems that lift logs entirely oft the ;pl oeo6nd.teduce the.disturbance of the protective layer of Irl, A;) k�!,duff 'Logging roads reoulre suitable surfacing for year-round Use Rock for road construction is not readily available 14 - this unit. Establishing plant cover on steep road cut and I ill slopes Wuces erosion. Steep yarding paths, skid Is, and firebreaks are subject to rilling and gullying i4 _,,�!-,Iral 'Unless adequate Water bars are provided or they are tected pro by plant cover. eedling mortality Is the main limitation for the duction of timber. Reforestation can be accomplished 4 lariting DoUglas-tir seedlings. If seed trees are genii natural reforestation of cutover'Areas by rod eri occurs periodically. The high temperature and low bisture content of the Everett soil during the growing .11beason cause high mortality of seedlings, especially those on south- and southwest -facing slopes. When openings are made In the canopy, Invading brushy plants, If not controlled, can delay the establishment of seedlings. Because the rooting depth Is restricted by a cemented pan In the Alderwood soil, trees are subject to windthrow. The main limitations of the Alderwood soil for septic tank absorption fields and homesites are steepness of slope and a seasonal perched water table. Effluent from absorption fields flows laterally above the pan and can seep at the bottom of slopes. Drainage Is needed If buildings with basements and crawl spaces are con§tructed. This soil sloughs readily when saturated. The main limitations of the Everett soil for septic tank absorption fields are -steepness of slope and seepage. If the density of housin'"O'li'moderati to high, community sewage systems are needed to*prevent contamination of water supplies as a result of seepage from onsite sewage disposal sypten,ls, Road buts tend to slough readily. . to protect the soils In this unit from erosion during construction, disturbed areas need to be seeded and runoff should be controlled. I This map unit Is In capability subclass Vile. 5_.�.Aldeeftod-�Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesi 1his map Unit Is on till plains. Areas are Irregular Pin shapd'6nd are 100 to 1,000 acres In size. The native I ','vegetation Is mainly conifers. Elevation Is 50 to 650 feet. -The average annual precipitation Is about 40 Inches, the average annual air temperature Is about 50 degrees F, and the average frost -free season Is 170 to 190 days. This unit Is about 60 percent Alderwood gravelly sandy loam and about 25 percent Urban land. The components of this unit are so Intricately Intermingled that It was not practical to map them separately at the scale used. Included In this unit are small areas of McKenna and Norma soils and Terric Medisaprists In depressional areas and drainageways on plains. Also Included are small areas of soils that are very shallow over a hardpahi, small areas of Everett, Indianolai and Ragnar soils on terracias and butwash plains; and soils that have a stony and bouldery surface layer. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the.total acreage. - -, The Aiderwood soil Is moderately deep over a hardpan and Is moderately well drained. It formed In glacial till. Typically, the surface layer Is very dark grayish brown gravelly sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil Is dark yellowish brown and dark brown very gravelly sandy loam about 23 Inches thick. The lower part Is olive brown very gravelly sandy loam about 5 Inches thick., A weakly cemented hardpan Is at a depth of about 35 Intoes. Depth to the hardpan ranges from 20 to 46 Inch e's. Poftneabillty of the'Alderwood soil Is moderately rapid above the hardpan and very slow through It. Available ! water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth Is 20 to 40 Inches. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion 4", §nohomlsh County Area, Washington j 'lislight. A seasonal perched water table Is at a depth of to 36 Inches from January to March. Urban land is areas that ate covered by streets, i-0UIIdIngb,, parking lotsi and other structures that obscure ��*'�Aiter the -soils go that Identification Is not possible. j&jiThe'AIderwood soil In. this unit Is used mainly for. ,,'parks, building sites, lawns, gardens, arid woodland. e Alderwood soil for jhe tn6in limitations of th liftesites and septic tank absorption fields are the ',-'depth to the hardpan and the seasonal, perched water big: Onsite Waste disposal systems often fail or do not nction properly during periods of high rainfall. Drainage fs'needed N buildings with basements and crawl spaces construdied. Topsoil needs to be stockpiled during �',ilie preparation and subsequently used to cover the 4' "exposed material. Additions of fertilizer and peat are i'desirable prior to seeding grass for lawns. This map unit Is In capability subclass lVe. G—Aiderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 15.percent il6pdi� This map unit Is on till plains. Areas are Irregular ."In ghipe and are 25 to 100 acres in size. The native jvdgetation Is mainly conifers and hardwoods. Elevation is 110 to 550 feet. The average annual precipitation Is about 40 Inches, the average annual air temperature is about [�t, -.50 degrees Fj and the average frost -free season is 170 a S. Is -unit Is about 60 percent Alderwood gravelly sandy �.-UA a n about 25 percent Urban land. The *components :P:4 q f t Is unit are so Intricately Intermingled that It was not I t map them separately at the sca ' loused. Inclu 9 In this unit are small areas of Everett and .'Indianola -soils on terraces andr outwash plains, Kitsap ;41 soils on terraces and terrace escarpments, and Ragnar I 11i�l soils on outwash plains. Included areas make up about 5 percent of the total acreage. Tj; The Alderwood soil Is moderately deep and formed In glacial till.- Typically, moderately well drained. It the surface layer Is very dark grayish brown gravelly sandy loam about 7 Inches thick. The upper part of the S' bs' u oil Is dark yellowish brown and dark brown very gravelly sandy loam about 23 Inches thick. The lower Part Is olive brown very gravelly sandy loam about 5 Inches thick. A weakly cemented hardpan Is at a depth of about 35 inches. Depth to the hardpan ranges from KC11 20 to 40 Inches. Permeability of the Alderwood soil is moderately rapid above the hardpan and very slow through it. Available water capacity Is low. Effective rooting depth Is 20 to 40 Inches. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion Is slight. A seasonal perched water table is at a depth of 18 to 36 Inches frord January to March. Urban land consists of areas that are covered by �f streets, buildings, parking lots, and other structures that ftil obscure or alter the soils so that Identification Is not possible. The Alderwood soil In this unit is used mainly for parks, building sites, lawns, and woodland. 6 The main limitations of the Alderwood soil for homesites and septic tank absorption fields are the depth to the hardpan and wetness because of the seasonal perched water table. Drainage is needed if buildings with basements and crawl spaces are constructed. Onsite sewage disposal systems often fall or do not function properly during periods of high rainfall. Topsoil needs to be stockpiled during site preparation and subsequently used to cover the exposed underlying material. Additions of fertilizer and peat are desirable, prior to seeding grass for lawns. This -map unit Is in capability subclass lVe. 7—Bellingham silty clay'loam. This very deep, poorly� drained soil is in depressional areas. It formed in alluvium and lacustrine sediment. Areas are regular In shape and are about 2 to 25 acres in size. The native vegetation Is mainly grass and sedges. Elevation Is 60 to 800 feet. Slooe is 0 to 3 percent. The average annual ., precipitation Is about 45 Inches, the average annual air temperature i� about 50 degrees Fj and the average frost -free season is 160 to 180 days. Typically, the surface layer Is very dark gray silty clay loam about 9 Inches thick. The subsoil -to a depth of 60 inches or more is mottled, gray and olive silty clay.. Included In this unit are small areas of Terric I Medisap . rists, very poorly drained organic soils, Norma - soils along upland drainageways, Kitsap and Pastik soils qq terraces,�'6nd Bellingham soils that have beent 1 .1. .-O.rained. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the tbtal acreabe. Permeability of this Bellingham soil Is slow. Available"k. water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth Is limited by a seasonal high water table that is at a depth of 0 to:. about 12 inches from November to June. Runoff is very slow, and the hazard of water erosion.is slight. Ponding i; occurs frdin' November to June. This unit is used for pasture, woodland, urban development, and wildlife habitat. This unit is suited to pasture if the excess water on the surface -is removed. Tile drains or open ditches can be used If suitable outlets are available. Grazing when the soil in this unit Is wet results In compaction of the surface layer, poor tilth, and reduced Infiltration. Use of j,.- proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted :t!:,;,A -j grazing during wet periods helps to. keep -the pasture In I good condition. Proper grazing practices, weed control, and fertilizer are needed for maximum quality of forage'. This unit Is suited to red alder. On the basis of a 50- -if'�: year site curve, the mean site Index Is 83. The mean,-. annual increment at culmination (CMAI) for red alder at.i,'! age 40 is 89 cubic feet per acre. Among the trees of limited extent on thisunit are Douglas -fir, bigleal maple T.1 western redcedar, and western hemlock. Among the, common forest understory plants are trailing blackberryi..:. western swordfern, thimbleberry, salmonberry, and iit!: huckleberry. The main limitation for the harvesting of timber is soil wetness, which limits the use of equipment to dry C�* LJ T. ^ -'X JE 1 t- I -L7P i ir- C- 16 rn -- I 9L�7 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S.C.S. TYPE.71A DISTRIBUTION 2-YEAR. 24-HOUR STORM 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - ;,'gNTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(INPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 0 i72j8l,0,0,25 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN ;7 .7. 81.0 .0 .0 25.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) .02 8.00 VOL(CU-FT) 820 - - -- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 1.0-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 0.72,81,0,0,25 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS Td(MINUTES) A CN A ..CN .7 .7 81.0 .0. .0 25.0. "PEAK-Q(,CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 8.00 1575 ----------- 7 --------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 100-YEAR. 24-HOUR STORM 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV)i A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 0.72,81,0,0,25 DATA PRINT -PUT: AREMACRES) .7 '(CFS) PEAK-Q 16 PERVIOUS A CN .7 81.0 T-PEAK(HRS) 7.83 IMPERVIOUS A CN .0 .0 VOL (CU-FT) 3415 TC(MINUTES) 25.0 C-- AINL IL. C: Ll IL, ^.7�r IF- A= L-Ac.- R� 14 -j-7 iL % Sc.-:) L4 -.4-2z (CL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - - - - ----------------------- S.C.S. TYPE"lA DISTRIBUTION -HOUR STORM 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP. 2-YEAR 24 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------ ENTER; A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 Oi22,86,0.5,98,6.3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREMACRES) .7 PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 86.0 .5 98.0 6.3 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .4 9 7.67 2716 ENTER (d:l[pathlfilename[.ext1 FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: GOOD -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- S.C.S. TYPE -IA DISTRIBUTION 10--�YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP.,*****'**** --------------------------------------------------------------- -------- IENTER- A(PERV),'CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .'I0I22j86,0.5,98,6.3 I.DATA PRINT-OUT: AREAWRES) PERVIOUS IM'PERVIOUS, TC(MINUTES) A CN A CW, 6-7 .2 86.0 �.5 98 ;*o 6.3 PEAk-Q(CPS) T-PEAK(HRS) _VOL(CU-FT) .28 7.67 3898 ;ENTER [dil[pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: �GOOD10 _'* ----------- ------- ---------- TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ,ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 '0.22,86,0.5,98,6.3 iDATA PRINT-OUT: AREMACRES) .7 PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS A CN A CN .2 86.0 .5 98.0 PFAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) A6 7.67 llgiitEiR.Eds](pathlfilenhme[.extI iQOODibO VOL (CU-FT) 6351 TC(MINUTES) 6.3 FOR'STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: