21400 72ND AVE W.PDF111111111111
5706
21400 72ND AVE W
ADDRESS: 12"Age, N
TAX ACCOUNTIPARCEL N`UMBERU5S20p0D2-2)fA&
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR -
CRITICAL AREAS: N,iz - DETERMINATION: []Conditional Waiver E] Study Required arwaiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:py 15 * 19 AM4%2u, m QzV A
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS
L
-03
M , ru
20 call mi,
Mw ,)
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID #: I I g
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT:*fF,2.$ BLOCK: hot)- 0 1
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: 4q�l
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
FOR -
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER--jbW -N I I I �Qw)
�!cw 14* [5q ( tL�
LATEMP\DS'rs\Fomis\Strect File Checklist.doc
.*PLANNING DATA
NM Commercial I Multi -Family Projects
ri
I E�ii]
Name: Al
Aq S-t 4 COL + 4 � c, 6
Date-- -� /-?,, s— / ((
Site Address: a c) -7 ?- A-,),e (,f-' .
Plan Check BLD - 0(7 Y
Project Description: e 157 ofJ U CJ'LWC_
Ube(*4:lf 99ed:
-Alro-We—d Use: (YE U
-C��um Eer.
I o All
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination issued: (YES I to
Reduced Site Plan Provided:f& NO)
Zoning: S7
M,qp Pnqt--
/111k<p� Use— 0
Comp Plan Designation: � I
Af� &C
Comer Lot: (YES I NO)
Flag Lot (YES /'NO) /l/ 0
.A913 File 14
Lot Area:
Shoreline Required: (YES/ NO) /110 LL
Plans Match A06 Approved: (YES I NO)
Critical Areas Determination#: ��jq_016 3
[A Study Required
a -Waiver
SEPA Determination:
V Exempt LL
El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake LL
-Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form)-M
rV A-,)C-, - . . . S&tbacks
!!71 Rdqiiired.
Weet:
Side:
Af
Side:
0
R e ar:
/S_ CZ
Aqtual $!�ZoaibWs
Street-
Side.
/0-+
r
Side-
0
Rear:
V7/
Lot CoveragetFAR Required:
Lot Coverage/FAR Provided: - 37,-716
Lot Coverage+A Calculations: e V5 q-zi Oq 3 0 4- A 0V 2 7
Bqddiiz _q;Hoight,
Datum Point: IV14-
Datum El vation:
Maximum Height:
Actual Height:
Subdivision: V, V
11;�P- kive_.,en -2 N 0o -,t a crt�e- G " �11
I
Lot Aggregation Required;__ 9 W
Lands
L 4cap4wj-Matehes A 13 Appr-eved.
0 (100%. Bid) -
Plan Review By:M'C ff&A -7
V . .0
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial I Multi -Family Projects
F =fL E I
..Commercia1Pqf*ingAna1ysis�
Business Name
Type/Use
Parking
Ratio
Tenant
Area
Required
Parking
(J�Pcre_ 5
C?,, V AU f ( &'T
k04,40
5//) q
5� �z q -
C/I. so 10?-0,44
Total Parking Require d.
Total Parking Pro vided_-
# Bedrooms per Owelling Unit
Parking Ratio
# Units
Parking
Studio
1-21D.U_
1 Bedroom
2 Bedrooms
1-8/D.U.
3 + Bedrooms
2.0/D-U-
Total Parking Requittw-
I
F,� Total Parking Provided.-
AJ
Plan Review By:
OV EDAI ON*
CITY OF EDM
1h
121 5 Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 - Web: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICEs DEPARTMENT: PLANNING DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW
-STAFFDEasioN-
BLD-2011-0474 Project Proposal
Aldercrest Health & Rehab is proposing a 225 square foot accessory structure for the site located at 21400
72 "d Ave. W. No changes are proposed to the existing convalescent home. The accessory structure will
be placed in the home's parking ' lot, taking up two parking spaces. Even with the elimination of the
spaces, the site will comply With the parking requirements of ECDC 17.50.
Property Owner
Aldercrest Health & Rehab
I I I W. Michigan St., Suite 293
Milwaukee, WI 53203 ,
Introduction
Applican
Hunt Engineering Svcs., Inc.
9560 Moran Road NE
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Contact
Paramount Painting & Svcs., Inc.
37351 S.R. 54W
Zephyr Hills, FL 33542
The subject location is addressed as 21400 72 d Avenue West. The Comprehensive Plan designates the
site as Mixed Use Commercial with the Medical/HighWay 99 Activity Center overlay. The site is zoned
RM — 1.5, Multiple Residential.
Design Review Process and Criteria
Due to the location and type of project (SEPA determination not required), district -based design review
by staff is required according to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.12.030.B (a Type I
decision). According to ECDC 20.12.070.B,'the proposal must be reviewed against the design standards
contained in ECDC 16.60 along with the general urban design standards as well as the policies specific to
the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center contained in the Comprehensive Plan.
Analysis
1. Comprehensive Plan Compliance.
a. Goals and Policies. Goals and policies for the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center are located
on pages 61 — 67 and are intended to encourage the development of high quality, well -designed
projects that reflect the values of the citizens of Edmonds. The proposal satisfies the intent of
following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan:
i. "New development should be high -quality and varied— not generic —and include amenities
forpedestrians andpatrons." (page 66)
ii. "New development should be allowed and encouraged to develop to thefullest extent possible
while assuring that the design quality and amenities provided contribute to the overall
character and quality of the corridor.". (page 66)
b. Design Objectives. General urban design objectives are found on pages 92 — 98. The proposal
meets the following general design objectives:
FILE
Page I of 3
File No. BLD-2011-0474
Aldercrest accessory structure
i. Site Design. "The development ofparking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping
features is an integralpart of how a building acts with its site and its surrounding
environment. Good design and site planning improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and
automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the
character and activities within a district and builds a more cohesive physical environment.
The proposed accessory structure will be located interior to the site in an area of existing
parking stalls, two of which will be removed by placement of the structure. An existing
walkway will provide access to the structure from the existing building.
ii. BuildingForm. "Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity
in buildingforms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to
ensure compliance withpolicies in the city's Comprehensive Plan. Protecting viewsftom
public parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound
are an important part ofEdmonds character and urbanform. "
The simple structure is slightly less than 10' tall and will not cause shadows or impact views.
iii. Building Facade. "Building Faqade, objectives ensure that the exterior of a building —the
portion of a building that defines the character and visual appearance of a place — is of high
quality and demonstrates the strong sense ofp1ace and integrity valued by the residents of
the City of Edmonds. " -
The proposed structure is a free-standing, pre -manufactured metal and glass shelter with
partially enclosed walls. It is composed of structural elements with a bronze anodized
aluminum finish covered by a standing seam brown metal roof and clear tempered glass sides
— see Attachment 1. The interior will be lit and a seating bench is included.
2. Compliance with ECDC 16.60.030 — Design Standards for the CG zone.
I
a. Site Design and Layout
(3)(a). "All lighting shall be shielded and'directed awayftom adjacent parcels. This may be
achieved through lower poles at the property lines andlorfull "cut ofi"fixtures."
The proposed structure has lighting mounted under the roof which will be cast downward, not
outward.
b. Building Design and Massing
(1). "Buildings shall convey a visually distinct "base " and "top. " A "base " and "top " can
be emphasized in different ways, such as masonry pattern, more architectural detail, step -
backs and overhangs, lighting, recesses, visible "plinth " above which the wall rises,
storeftont, canopies, or a combination thereof They can also be emphasized by using
architectural elements not listed above, as approved, that meet the intent."
The proposed structure has a visually distinct top and base — see Attachment 1. It is of simple
construction designed for weather protection and light outdoor use.
Decision
Based on the facts and analysis of this report, staff finds that the design review for this project (File No.
BLD-2011-0474) is APPROVED.
I have revi d the application for compliance with the Edmonds Community
Mike Clugston, Olanning Division
Date
;nt Code.
Page 2 of 3
File No. BLD-2011-0474
Aldercrest accessory structure
Appeals
Per ECDC 20.01.003 and 20.07.006, appeal of this Type I decision must be filed by a party of record with
standing to file a land use petition in Snohomish County superior court within 21 days of the issuance of
the decision.
Attachments
1. Typical elevation view
Page 3 qf3
OF
t
41( Af a= W
An tlL
ds
IN
77 iw
16 JLI 161- ,16,
07
CitY Of Edmonds
Building ]DIPTaftent
APPROVE4 3
111AN
180" [151
-SIDE ELEVATION:
12
STANDARD ELECTRICAL ENTRY
gl 4R
'A_
ALLOWABLE HEIGHT
FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION
— 1831"
2 [15'-31"] GUTTER
2
— 1761" [14'-81"1
2 2
...... ...... 27"
BACK 11 BE
N 27"
L 14'-81
2
:IGHTABOVEJ
1831" [15'-31"]
2 2 1: N
GUTTER
N N
N
PLAN VIEW
12 3 4
41"
2
T
FILE
RESUB
JUN 2 3 2011
BUILDING DEPARc.—MENT
CITY OF EI)MONDS
NOTES:
-BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM FINISH
-1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS
-STANDING SEAM METAL GABLE ROOF
-ROOF COLOR TBD
-SEE QUOTE FOR SPECIFICS
HIS DRAWING IS PROPRIETARY AND FOR THE SOLE USE OF OUR PROJECT NAME
[H
U
C STOMER AND MAY NOT BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT
PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT FROM DUO-GARD INDUSTRIES, INC. 10047 (9131) PARAMOUNT PAINT ALDERVREST HEALTH AND REHAB
LEAD TIME BEGINS UPON RECEIPT OF SIGNED SHOP DRAWINGS DESCRIPTION
0 G A R 0
APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE 15'X 15'TRANSIT STYLE SHELTER
__rR G DATE :N�
PRJTENG PRJT MGR "AL
Tel (734) 207-9700 Fax (734) 207-7995 w IIE1112 r118
www.duo-gard.com . x ISSR 5127111 KK 1
PAGE OF 1 IDRWNG#
1 1 10047
Nothing ir, this permit apprLT- prGOW, ",'be
interpmed as aflowing or permitting tile
maintenance of any'currently
DODWnforming or wipermined building, arrowrt.
Or Site condition which is outside the scope of the
Mdt a%catio ""P—';Ls of whe"M
dinX u
cture ol. condl �on is shown on the
site plan or drawing. Such building, sbuctuM or
Gmfton -my be the subjeci cif n. gTgrW
##*t**Kp-#! W"wil �
11
0
0 PLANNING DATA
is 11 STREETF=ILE I
-- Signs --
Name:
ate: 1.
Site Address: RIV00 - 77P'�W
Ave-, W
Plan Check #: BLD-200'7 - Ocl?-f
Project Description: PeA-6ac "sk., %WN rWAZ -S;C�n
. C%OL
V—
Reduced Site Plan Provided:
G)/ NO) Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan Designation:
?9 AcksA
,Xe
—,- - -
y u4eq
Map Page:
Corner Lot: (YES
Flag L (YES
ADB Fi le # (or date waived):-
1OZ1010-7 AtiS &,�e
W—C, or, a0-1.0.CQ0-,%-rffi
10TAL Aiea 'Ve Of Sign
fler Ty
Allowed in
Matrix
t
Allowed
TOTAL sign
area
Proposed
Type of Sign
zone?
conditions
area per
Unit
allowed for
sign area
met?
unit
this sign
Example
wall wlinternal
t1lumInation
Yes, with
condItions
Yes
I sq. ffllineal
ft. attached
41 ff. attached
wall
41 square feet
20 square feet
wall
Sign #1
Reeft It
NIA
%N
NIA
Sign #2
Sign #3
TOTAL
Sign Arej for
e. -to 6t reviovgW
Max Permitted:
[Previous Total: so"&
Pf1posed Total:
Igo
Sion Height At
Sign Type:
Max Permitted: I Lf
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Lightin_q
Sign Type:
FCW,4�04.n
Pror
T!�Or&_, I
Allowed in Zone:
- YM
C5
Sign Type:
Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
0 0
PLANNING DATA
-- signs --
1 S ---]I
1 TREETFILE
sign Coiors
Proposed:
-T
Acceptable? Ye,%
Requires ADB Approval? Ato
ign Locatioh
If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a fence) meets setbacks? yeb
Requir&d5i�tbaCk5
Street: Side:,,) 10� SideA*y_.,,., (W)
Actual Setback5
Street: Side 65)
aoiligfor reestanding Signs
Lan 15c .,F
Size. 369P ref"%*rca� 3r#* + prlav-deef
Location: Ex --41 V,.r&*- OR MhCU3"
Critical Areas Determination #: CRA- VITY-01G3
Study Required
Waiver
Other
er ECDC -jo. Go. 0as.
rejekle4t-A %one%
-te\ 4-le- %N Zone.
Plan Review By:
It
ervices Department City Recelp
Planni�g Division Critical- Areas File 9:
Phone: 425.771.0220 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $1�s.00
41e; 1890 FM . 425.771.0:211 Date Mailed to Applicant -
The Chtical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out. by any person. preparing a Development
Permit Applicat ' ion for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the city.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable Cit� staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Are" we,' or
may be, present on the subject property. The information
needed to complete the Checklist sbou . Id be easily
available from observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil
surveys).
A property owner, or hi&%a authorized representative,
intist4ill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist,*makc a
precursory site visit, and make a detamination of the
subsequent steps necessary to'oomplete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of. this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on -this form. in
addition, the applicant shall include otim pertinent
information (e.g. site Plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
Ile undersigned applicant and hislher/its heirs, and assigns, in cons*
t . 0 release, inddirh*. defend and hold the Cit ideraticin on the processing of the application agrees
y� of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable
611 based alse, mis in ura
.attorney's fees, arising fim any action, T. . raction in whole or part upon f lead g, inacc te or
incomplete information fimshed by the a0plicant,'hisdxzfits agents or employees.
By my signature, A certify that the information and exhbits herewith subn3itted arc true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am.authorized to file, this appli�ation on the behalfof the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF AIMUCANXIAGENT DATE
Property Owner's Authorization
BY my signatureJ certify that I have authorized the above ApplicantfAgent to apply for the sulNect land use application.
and grant MY permission for the public officials and the staff of the.City of Union& to enter the subject vwperty for the
-Owner/Appliput:
Elm o -, b'sp),
kU �q I
Name. .111 1 . t .-
MAJ
Sft& Address
city State
zip
Applicant Representative:
Aose Wal - ry-�
ex C,
Name
q6a 1\1tj ga
,Uand
Sfte&t Addrms
J. Sel=a 460- wl!:;, 67 5z 16-7
city state zip
-00( -701
Telepbone:_ - -TeJephone-
Email address (optional): M. p (Dar -c
cAa:,InSIC)k).EnmRAddrew(60onal): Vn&c;�(j QiQL1MS1Qh,,f0
RECEOVED
OCT - 2 2007
BUILDING DEPT,
#P20
Critical Areas Checklist
CA File No:
Site Information (sods/ topography/hydrology/vegetation)
" - y
1.. Site Address/Location: —2 t 00 N 13 A Fw m anjt6 WA- 9 so.
2- Property Tax.Account-Number. 00 5-'�O "7'6 UQ 0 a -,-I of
3. �pproxijnate Site Size (acres or square feet)'
4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; — no.
If yes; how is site developed?. NuIr's 1, 126 4- Pta 6L
5.
Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on 'site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
HiRy: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water Y'J 0 Approx. Depth:
7. Site contaims areas of seasonal standing water: &10 Approx. Depth.
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain PJ C> of a watercourse.
9- Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
/Q 6 Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily- forested meadow -_;shrubs mixed 01
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) C4 t- S
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No
For City Staff Use Only
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable?
2- Site is Zoned?
3. SCS mapped soil type(s)?
4. - Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site?
5. Site within designated earth -subsidence landslide hazard area?
DEIT MINATION
STUDYREQUIRED WAIVER
OWE
7
, 1A
ita
A NURSWG AND REHABILITATION CENTER
A n
JtXTENDICARE�
�LM
'n
66.
Y o-�
�Qk
ti4; fk"
a
-�T' I:rdf' P"
X-R
OCT 2
JILDING Di
:CITY OF I
-?D 1 / 6---) / <�7,1 0 h I -a (- -t-,
Extendicare Health Services Monument Sign
Az
f 171
C_ Ire
V\j
Plan View
4L
50nd blo5ted sign Foam
ro f
ROISCCI le-tterin(3
PoInted aluminum fluted columns
Ws
OCT 26
-Hertyge BUILDING DEPARTMtNT
t CITY OF
EDMONDS
A NURSING AND WMILITAY10N ENTER
70'_
MEN E
ovnd inq
Front View -------
Wu
7
Jill
Jill!
Jill
IN111
;Illljil'"ill ... ...... ill IM Ill 1111 [111
AFFRUVLU AS NOILD
BY ENGINEERING
4t
de:
....... ---- ----
v �l
Q tV
kl
�f`7 t'
7
3,
1 T'
�4V
Y
:j
72-1 AVE. W.
tf
LJ-
e t4'+ -v 0
15
em�c-r' Property Line OCT 2 6 2007
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
7.1
Jell",
am
lit
lb
:o0wi
V
0
01j,
�4hoq� tAA)
Al- S
;cr
'o I
0" mw
gb
qpm*
4b
--gggg-oft.-
7,7t
34�
INV 6 J P.60
INV, 546.0�
543
ON
CAI 5T 0
T 7 1 '%�-UrK -,W% -T K Vfw—V!
ovcpt L x I so
Gro P I! L 6 v�,
A, E!S:U It.
CT 6' 2 o o
91
i U LDING:DQAR T
0 T
PTY OF ED Nf
uNothing in this permit apprwkl " be
=2 the
interpreted as allbwing er ;m
mWitenance of any currently illegal,
noncon6rming or 4wermitted b==' structure
or site condition which is outside the scope of the
permit application, regardless of whether such
buildin& structure or condition is shown on the
eke lank r drawing. Such building, structure or
cong=OZ be the subject of a separate
enforcement action.*
AC3 006 FAIdon MC w/WAC AmerArsents
006 Edition MC w/WAC Amiondments
0 006 Edition UPC w/WAC Anuodments
and Appen&,es A, B, Q 1
C32006 Edition IMC w/WAC Amendments
132006 Edition EFOC w/WAC AU=Ddmcnts
[32006 Edition 1FC w/WAC AMendmeM
[32006 Edition VJAQ WAC 51-13
02006 Edition WSEC WAC 5 1-11
Any request for alternate design, modification,
variance or other administrative deviation
(hereinafter "variance") frOn" adopted codes,
Ordinances or Policies must be specifically
requested in writing and b�""called Out and
identified. Processing fees for subh request shall be
established by Council and sh"al'i, be paid upon
submittal and are non-refundable. _
2) Approval of any plat or plan containing
Provisions which do not comply with city9code and
for which a variance has not been �recifically
identified, requested and considered by the
appropriate city official in accordance-, with the
appropriate Provision of city code or state law does
not approve any items not to code specification.
- - - — - -_ J
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
WoRK)V, *
[ADD SS r-
CWJ
CWNE
[APPROVFHDDA-1,;;��19131
-TLC 3. C4F.--_,_!AL-
PDE:R[I�gy NUMBER
RESUB
OCT 2 6 20107
WILDING DEPAMMEW
C1W OF EDMONIA
STREET FILE
10
U)
U',I1D,kN,G..-: P,E VARTM E I
--AppUcan t-F1W-
USE
ZONE PEW
.740298
PE Mlt-ATI ON
R M I
Inilde;Heavy�L'I"C'.-
P
JOE;
ADORES
W
GJM
ISSIBLE
LOT COV'ERAGE7'
ACTUAl;V21
LOT Co AGE
0
MAXLI1,[G ADDRESS
PER, ISSIBLE HEIGHT
PROU§ED HEIGH
14L
IZ/00 0 cr
0
LOT AREA
11 DO AREA
et,
_37L
ZIU
D Y ARDS
N
FRONT SIDE REAR FRONf___7§'1`DE REAR
124 &D IDS, ;Tl—
�s/
VARIANCE OR ONDIT1014AL USE
PE�e" L70 NO� PE C
. RMIT NUMBER
&0/
9q
CITY,_ -
TELEPHONE NUMBER
N
Cd
ADDRESS
]all
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
CITY LICENSE NUMBER
Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copies)
_Gzlclil
7
7 la,944,1
Z
7 Z nu
'�PY�P R I,
P��G D
=.T REET R/W. FT
FV'T
DEFICIENCY THIS PROPERTY
COMP, PLAN ST. R/W..k..'.
FT. N
REMARKS
MY,Tka 01" SERVICId SIZIG I CLUI—Meh;
CREEK= BY
REMARKS
TYPE CONNECTION
VERIF ED r
PERC. TEST
PERMIT NUMBER c:
REMARKS
QC
FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION STREET IMPROVED
—/Z- I
_T7-_
[3 NO
sl ECTOR nEQUIRED
CCUPANCY GROUP
10
F� GAS
RESIDENTIAL
IDE IAL LINE
ADD 15ir NON-RFS NT SIGN
RETAINING
DEMOLISH WALL
EXCAVATE PONCE
ALTER OR FILL ( .......... x . ..Ft.)
0 NO
u cK
RED THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY—
Prcl`,�;c
- By OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX
2N__Z__ SHOULD BE CODED, 31,04,
REMARKS
2-
REPAIR PRE -MOVE swim
INSP. POOL
NU."IBER OF STORIES
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
UNITS Go
NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE
06��D\ a(T-1 013 C?— 4 L) <,-
Check No..
Valuation
Fee
Receipt No.
z
0
- 3,U7M.
BUILDING
-
PROPOSED USE
&UA/4-
PLUMBING
Q
PLOT PLAN (Indicate
Building setbacks,
a!)utting street.)
HEAT & GAS LINE
FENCE
SIGN
RETAINING WALL
N
Sw:MMING POOL
DEMOLITION
PRE -MOVE INSPECTION
EXCAVATION OR FILL
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I hereby ack nowledge that I have read this application; that the In-
.7
formation gl"n 1. correct ; and that I a= the owner, or the duly author -
Ned agent of the o,,ner. I so to comply with city and state laws regu.
lating constmetloti: and 1 '10 9 the work authorized thereby, to person
ATTENTION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
wlq,beT?f;V4�yed In vlolat a or a Labor Code of the State of Washington
sting to rkmen'm C mpeng tion Insurance.
t On Yedr (E.C,pt DEMOLITIONS �vhkh
she eted�nC ty d 3: MOYED-IN B10](LDINGS shall be oom.
a
a
ae
THIS PER31IT
AUTHORIZES
ONLY TILE
WORK NOTED
This application is not a permit until
signed by the BuIldIng Official or his Dep-
uty; and fees are paid, and receipt is ac-
provided.
*t
"Ie
7�pace
A
INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT
CITY OF
/�ed
/i
L31ONA 0 N'r)
DAT N
7�_ W
EWTONDS
DATE
NOTE: Applicant Subiect to Plan Check Fee
PR 6-1107
This P1rmlt Coven work to be done an Private property ON"LY.
Any constmetlo. on the public domaln (Curb$, sidewalks, driveway.,
-Nsl
4q-
t4
Or
%
%
it
NA
%
0
A/ Ir
i A��f
. a. V
0
0 t:r -
LI LL, �.- -A
if) - .1 % I � 14
Ir
----------
jo� ' rl:lt
esc---
f
Ell
--------------
-Y VT
4 61' IN 40, %V
72ndA"m OLM
Crest Wisk
Ancent OR CO'NSTRUCTION -114d
rAnp.ral rnnir'fittlors '.. 'Wfimf
w
2
COLE NO.
Critical Areas Checklist , - :
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrplogy/vegetation)
1. Site Address/Location: 914n() 79nrl Ayp Wp-qi-- Fdmnnc3.q,, UA 98026
2. Property Tax Account Number: 15 IB(3q — OCO 0 a-3
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? _?2L_yes; _ no.
If yes; how is site developed? Skilled Nursing Facility
5. D*-.-scribe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
XX Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water. No Approx. Depth.�-
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: NO Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway NO floodplain — NO of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? NO Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow _; shrubs mixed
urban landscaped Qawn,shrubs etc) XX
11. Obvious wedand is present on site: xx
R"81104W
STREET FLE
8.90 -19q
0
City of Edmon&
Critical'Areas Chec'Mist
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on
this form is to be filled out by any person
preparing a Development Permit
Application for the City of Edmonds prior
to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable.
City staff to determine whether any
potential Critical Areas are or may be
present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the
Checklist should be easily available from
observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps,
or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative,
must fill out the rhecklist, sign and date it,
and submit it to the City. The City will
review the checklist, make a precursory site
visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessaryto complete a
development permit application.
With a signed copy of this form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel
with enough detail that City staff can find
and identify the subject parcel(s). In
addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (eg. site
plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in
conjunction with this Checklist to assist
staff in completing thew preliminary
assessment of the'site.
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
factual,- to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner / Applicant:
Name
Street Address
City, State, ZIP Phone
Signature Date
Applicant Representative:
r.;IiI F- nIT)PII
Name
21400 72nd Ave West
Street Address
Edmonds, WA 98026 775-1961
City, State, ZIP Phone
Signature Date
STREET-FO.E
0 - 1
City of Ed�non&
Critical *Areas Checklist
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on
this form is to be filled out by any person
preparing a Development Permit
Application for the City of Edmondsprior
to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable
City staff to determine whether any
potential Critical Areas are or may be
present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the
Checklist should be easily available from
observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps,
or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative,
must fill out the -checklist, sign and date it,
RECEIVED
DEC 2 0 1994
PERM'T COUNTER
and submit it to the City. The City will
review the checklist, make a precursory site
visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary . to complete a
development permit application.
With a signed copy of this form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel
with enough detail that City staff can find
and identify the subject parcel(s). In
addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent infonuation (e.g. site
plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in
comjunction with this Checklist to assist
staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
factual, -to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner / Applicant:
Name
Street Address
City, State, ZIP Phone
Signature
Applicant Representative:
r.;;il F_ 01T)P11
Name
21400 72nd Ave West
Street Address
Edmonds, WA 98026 775-1961
City, State, ZIP Phone
Date Signature Date
t
I . . C*E NO. qLA - I Vt)
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
1. Site Address/1,ocation: 72nd Ayp Wp-qf-- 'Fdmnndc;,, WA QR026
2. Property Tax Account Number:
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? _22�_yes; _ no.
If yes; how is site developed? Skilled Nursing Facility
5. Dr.icribe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
XX _ Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: NO Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: NO Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway NO floodplain NO of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? NO Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: torested meadow —; shrubs mixed
urban landscaped Oawn,shrubs etc) XX
11. Obvious wedand is present on site: xx
RCV01t04t94
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
PLANNING DIVISION
ADVISORY REPORT
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
To: . James Driscoll, Hearing Examiner
From:
John Bissell, AICP
Associate Planner
Date: DECEMBER 8, 1994
File: CU-94-141
Hearing Date, Time, And Place: December 15, 1994, At 9:00 AM
Plaza Room - Edmonds Library
650 Main Street
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
I
A. APPLICATION ..............................................................................................................................
I
B. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................ 2
11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 2
A. SITE DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................
2
C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE ............................
3
D. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ..........................................................................................................
3
E. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC) ...............................................................................................
3
III. RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS ..................................................................................................
3
A. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION .........................................................................................
4
B.APPEALS .......................................................................................................................................
4
IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL .............................................................................................................................
4
V.APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................................
4
VI. PARTIES OF RECORD ..............................................................................................................................
4
I. INTRODUCTION
A. APPLICATION
1. Applicant: WHCC, Aldercrest Convalescent Hospital (see Attachment 2).
2. Site Location: 21400 72nd Avenue West (see Attachment 1).
3. Reguest: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a temporary, 440 square foot,
prefabricated office as an accessory office to an existing 41,514 conversant hospital building in the
RM zone district.
4. Review Process: Conditional Use Permit, Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes
final decision.
CU94141 R. DOC / Dceembff 8, 1994 / Staff Report
WCC1 I Mdercrest
File No. CU-94-141
Page 2 of 4
5. Maior Issues:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 16.30 (Residential
Multiple Zone District).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 17.70 (Temporary
Uses).
c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.05
(CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS).
B. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on Statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report, we recommend approval of
this application subject to the following conditions:
1. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community
Development Code. It is the responsibility'of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various
provisions contained in these ordinances.
2. The temporary building must receive approval of the Architectural Design Board prior to
installation.
3. The applicant must secure an approved building permit for the' installation of the temporary
building prior to installation.
4. The conditional use permit shall be valid for a period of one year, provided however, that said
pennit may be extended by the Community Services Director for a single one year extension upon
subinival of a written application prior to the expiration date of the original permit and granting of
the extention by die Planning Dicvison.
5. The permit should be transferable.
11. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SITE DESCRIFTION
1. Site Development And Zoning:
a. Facts:
(1) Size: The subject property is approximately 197,496 square feet in area with
approximately 633-fect of frontage along 72nd Avenue West. (see attachment 3).
(2) Land Use: The site is currently developed with a 41,514 conversant hospital building.
(3) Zonin : The zoning of the subject property is RM 1.5, (Residential, Multiple Family,
1,500 square feet of lot area required for each dwelling unit), (see Attachment 1).
(4) Terrain and Vegetation: The subject property has been landscaped with ornamental
landscaping including perimeter landscaping and internal parking lot landscaping.
(5) Parkin The subject site currently provides 59 parking stalls. Instalation of the
proposed tem,porary building will elliminate three (3) parking stalls, leaving 56 stalls after
the installation is complete. The total development will require 53 parking stalls after the
installation of the temporary building.
b. Conclusion: As conditioned, the proposed development should not be detrimental to the site,
and it does appear to be compatible with the current development and use of this property.
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a. Facts: Properties to the north, South and east are zoned CG. The properties to the
north are developed with multiple family residential, the properties to the south are developed
CU94141R, DOC/ December 8, 1994 /Staff Report
WCC1 I Aldercrest
File No. CU-94-141
Page 3 of4
with medical offices and the properties to the cast arc developed with a retail store and a vacant
auto dealership. The properties to the west are zoned RM 2.4 and are developed with multiple
family residential dwellings, medical offices and a hospital. (see Attachments 1).
b. Conclusion: The proposed site development is compatible with tile surrounding
development and zoning.
C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE
1. Compliance with RM 1.5 Zoning Standards
a. Facts:
(1) The fundamental site development standards pertaining to development in a Multiple
Family Residential Zone District are set forth in Chapter 16.30.
(2) The applicant is proposing to locate the proposed building in compliance with the RM 1.5
zone district standards.
1). Conclusion: Tile proposal appears to comply with all bulk standards for RM 1.5 zones as set
forih in Chapter 16.30.
2. Compliance with requirement for a Conditional Use Permit
a. Fact: Section 20.05.010 of the ECDC states tile criteria by whicivall Conditional Use Permits
applications arc to be reviewed. These include that (lie proposal conform to both tile
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code, and that the proposal mill not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, and welfare.
b. Conclusion: As conditioned, the requested Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with
the criteria of ECDC Section 20.05.0 10.
D. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
1. Review by City Departments
a. Facts:
(1) Engineering Division: One portable fire extinguisher will be required in the unit. All
electrical connections must meet tile electrical codes.
(2) No other City Departments submitted comments for this application.
b. Conclusion: The applicant must follow the requirements of all City Departments.
E. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC)
1. Comprehensive Plan Designation
a. Fact: The subject property is designated as High Density Residential.
b. Conclusion: The subject property complies with the identified land use designation oil the
Comprehensive Plan Map as a conditional use in the allowed zone district.
111. RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of tile deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any
person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department
for further procedural information.
CU94141 R. DOC / December 8, 1994 / SMIT Repa
0
A. . REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
WCO-1 AJdcr'
File No. CU-94-1
Page 41 of 4
Section 20. 100.0 10.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if
a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person
who attends -the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any
person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or
recommendation. The reconsideration request muit cite specific references to the findings and/or the
criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed.
B. "PEALS
Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation
shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed
along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group
appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision
to be wrorig. The appeal must be filed %krith the Community Development Director within ten (10)
working days after the date of the decision being appealed.
IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required,
substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use
permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time
before the expiration date.' A
V. APPENDICES
ATTACHMENTS I THROUGH 4 ARE ATTACHED.
1. Vicinity / Zoning Map
2. Application
3. Site Plan
4. Floor Plan
VI. PARTIES OF RECORD
Applicant
Planning Department
Engineering Department
Fire Department
Parks Department
CU94141P-DOC / December 8, 1994 / Staff Repart
.4,"A q
ST S. CO"ONDS
S 0 L
'VESTA
. I SENIOR N S
. I'- -
7!
11 us c a
'V DS
/0
OOL
HIGH 5JCHOOL 2
15T H T w
s 215TH ST Sw
12
215TH PL
I" Sig S W..
& 216TH S S W 2 TH
0)
C))
RM-2-4 TRACTS
18TH T.
x
170 q
—K
0
?I THSST SW. W,
RS-8
0 ul&� mm"m — —�a 2201 ST S*. w. 220 TH ST
2681
.00 C G
-A
222 040 ST. &w.
R M
2.4
I RM
&
-08
0
25 Its.
LAKE SALUNG
S- R 8
ELEMENTARY SCI
BC
BC
2
C..G-
T" PL �2 S. - ;- . IN PL. S
>!
j —Pnf%nc Ail r
VICINITY MAP
ATTACBMENT 1
city of edmonds
land use application
0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
11 COMP PLAN CHANGE
14 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
El FORMAL SUBDIVISION
0 HOME OCCUPATION
11 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
11 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMEND
11 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP
11 REZONE
11 SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
11 SHORELINE PERMIT
E] SHORT SUBDIVISION
11 STREET VACATION
0 VARIANCE
11 RESUBMITTAL FILE #
J 1) L 2 7 19 S !I
1 kzm
1
FILE #--�
4 - ZONE
L
DATE RE 'D BY
FEE IUL
RECEIPT #
HEARING DATE
HE 0 STAFF 11 PB . 0 ADB CC
ACTION TAKEN:
0 APPROVED DENIED DAPPEALED
APPEAL#
Applicant WHCC Aldercrest Convalescent Center — Phone �06-775-1961
Address 21400 72nd Ave West Edmonds, Wa 98026
Property Address or Location SAME
Property Owner Unicare 14ealf-h Phone 1 aw-a95-5000-
Address 105 W. Michigan St. Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53203
Agent Gail E. 01 Phone :z:75-i ar,1
Address 21400 72nd Ave West, Edmonds, WA 98026
Tax Acc #
;-brf— 0A %-5
Sec.il-59—=-Twp. —Rng.
Legal Description. Skilled Nursinct FaCilitV cii:'!s- tia placp a 111�3t nf f i ce
modular unit in parking lot. Will not involve resid'ent population.
TO be titilized as a staff evelopment/edducation u0f ice azect.
Details of Project or Proposed Use --Mp0r;%=-1 -Office Sr%
Cam -E-GaPital Modular Spaee
GS-1048 Three office model 440 sq feet - See specifications and features
zxbtacimd.
The undersigned applicant and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application
agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including
reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading,
inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
The undersigned applicant grants his/her/its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter
the subject property for the purpose of inspectio nd osting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER /AG EN
Se-(5�
tog_ WO-Irtp-1 50t
f-EQUIltEV --6A ZIAT* 12
FIPK _STWr_ WMT'k_ WILL- _&C-4e CuKIS-fo-cilseg_
-P-0 Jay -CA)
za
'WA
V�__ LIA-0 cr 067-YOL
Bp Wo +
MAM C5 sp,
s m
I
\11 'Itil
4
MAINE: C— L 4-C.O.4mr-
11Z� EQU&L—
tar
4�1n.-Fu4rr"IEN-r-
A
A6
45. C--, ^- L S I
C
I T Y
OF E,L)MwNDS
DATE e7
STANDARD DETAILS
------- CA
APPVO.,��y A/
QW0, No,
UY.
.00
I �
z U. t-4 L-- � C.- -ro re- "
r---% w fa m
Gl L-) -rr ES 7— 1 N L- MT r-1 r- ME
15
.(:5-TUT.TMW- I.WL-M-r 'Pi pr-
I
rz�l
jC(=;-t-4 C,,. r:l M A C- K-
e4
to
4
U.Nmtzy. coo,
ul
UJI
CITY- OF EDMONDS
DATE 12/21/G7 STANDARD DETAILS SCALE:
APPV DWG. , No.
BY: a-/ HOLE- E S"TO. Zol_
TIOS S6clsool RIEOUItED FurviLe sr. wip1w
is 46 cuts -I#- CoAts
ff,�7-14r L
SEICnHF50 b-CZLLEX=T0*io7—
%QM -=22 u .. In,- MY
Q;L-SLAWSSON
ew-rH 4 \vr=--5-r
z
Lu
MIN u
Ul
it-
ra-L 0
WALIC
—,,L, ew zr
ol
W/77
77� 7-70�
col��
E-Z!C.Omp-r. oe-pr" ce, -rbF
LI'ME-S 'ON.
, T
m1w.
Ir
ecv,.A- a - -I"= I(::>,,
LO w
-ro POF cotem DtzivF-\N/&Y--,f
MCA 0 e)L)V-F/-bC IF �L-1 W'=—
V)
j
-GEM; COKIC, CUMM, c-.:quT-rp—rz
r--UL-L
-=iZI w L t: E
lr=,�Ljs C:?,
-7!le..R-A CA L CU 1— tD S r5&C.
ui
>
'--44,& L L- me uz wo os.-r --n s wr
J.0 t-J 7'
" / f
F=' L- A., 1-4 L- vs - )/,z Z. I - 0
I
A.,
i;3�PROPERT
..................
Pe li§sib
-NOTE
TO�.!�2"
,.,NOTE�Vo
IS M. If-. P
'MU
WE `.,!;",PE:R,
%"Y I!.
ARTMENT
..DEP
,W
-�A
141
te
�Ix
PERMIT,,'
7
for�r;id*e
he' c on
Us
'!holi�ay I s t on'
NO or,,!
w i" S at., Sun��,
ai
Nj1,0F, QNSTR b ......
4 'A'
0
0 U T-10M .................... I
MAn
................................ ...... ....................... ... .......... .........................
-;kEGA%L bjESCRIPIION-�:,"
r� ........ ...... ......................... .. ...................................................................
....................
........... .......................
.................................... ............................................... ................. ......................................................
y
-n
[)a br�,Cbf
...................... s.*rruc ph' -Thc,:-
.. . ...........
................ ................................. .................. .........
................................... ..................... .........................
n6dl- :Con, t, octio,6 . . . . . .
5: 74
19i:... for to*,:t e're tkisanitir"
....................... .................
'zotE mon s
Mrdanp&,,Wi6��Clt`y dii d'�.'*'o'r'd*in*it'n*'c'e"s.,','-�'r;',"'i':!*%*',,.".,,,,:,,
41
f
FOLLOWING
'he`owrierg,
t 4,
`.btE�I�L a yp�mltjtq.,,constrvl� -�se%�er,,,Iinside:,I)ro�brty,;Iine' �d
'N' r'�!bifore'�l t :'fiaAbebwji�spedted'�' 14' �:construct:�
mov6r�-any_ port lon,�oc,sc
I K w6rkgperf6ry�ed'. i ri,y6i txI fl saanj 1*��i�i�h'��oi:i:i6gnt-oi!���-.Pe�iiii't' b
;,',Ordina��clri.r 1*A'3
�Q
�ave
Pdrp.�rithan Ine amdl-12,An f
_�prqp.crtx.! hn�:,. rn.knlrnurn�;grade'�76fi!2
..0 ?,vinugra�W
-oz*J�Ipal, �ditlofi� - fi�tbl� '�fi�jjf�';Jutr� 'to r�proper
qrs shall,,be ',�cspo�j.
due
I
12. �1. '?K!1;_
. ................... ... � - 1'! 7 ;.-' - �
.1 1 .... ; .................. ......
'j`c6`n't'ra,ct1n_g-Fjr,
c6rdifi'd . e)mAhiA111;'govermng� I ordin
44,
P�� to do ny. work',on thc main- siwertor� itg�appui6Aaidcei
Y� ...... ......................
........ . ............................................
......................
1AY
... ..... . .............................................. ......
. . ......................... ......................
................ ......
. ............... ................
c
�rforming;�,onstr,uctioh",PRIOR�.T,6.R,V,qii�s't;?iq r
4,
r ify.,,.tha.t-;thets e�sewer4,ihstall*a't.*ion;,,construct*ed
f,'Edmbnds-,
q
K"
...........
BY............
...............
Jon-- r".1
bffiskperinit-�,,�
APPLICATIOW
T6 City of Edmonds for
ILr— SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT NO . ............
_ ................ ..........
NEW CONSTRUCTION kEPAIRS
--_---------- ASMT. NO,
.............
N-T-R-ACTOR
.................. .... C6
----------_----
JOB ADDRESS Zk4lc'� ......... --------- NO. --------------
---------------------------------------------
......... ........ ...................... LEGAL -DESCRIPTION: --LOT- NO;, ---.-.-.BLOCK NO - --------
... ----------------------------
----------------------
....................
------------------ --------------------------------------------- --------------
ON %QE=
NAME OF ADDITI
-------------------------------------------- I ------------------------- ------------
LIM&
JEV;:_�
Approved:
DATE
BY -----
---------------------------
i Of
,.,NA
E,D *
0
16
.&L
m
ME-
w
0
z
c\j
r�,--
CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS — BUILTS
ADDRESS:
21400 72ND AVE W
HOMEOWNER: CONTRACTOR:
ROTO ROOTER
DATE DRAWN: DRAWN BY: SCALE: PERMIT NO.
8/2/05 1. ABILA NTS 19889
9
AAA TANK SERVICE CO., INC.
729 Kirkland Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033
Phone: (425) 803-3032 Fax: (425) 827-1444
CERTIFICATION OF TANK RINSE
The fuel storage tank at the site described below has been pumped and rinsed in general
accordance with applicable Washington State Uniform Fire Code guidelines and local Fire
Department requirements.
Owner/Operator:
Siteaddress: —Aldercrest Health & Rehabilitation Center
214,0.0 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, WA 98020
Snohomish Coun.ty Parcel No.: 00580.700002301
Capacity of tank: 300 9:allons
Last substance stored: diesel/fuei oil
Cleaning contractor: XXX AAA Tank Service Co., Inc. (WDOE Service Provider #SO02307)
Other:
Date rinsed: June 4, 2004
Procedure used: "triple -rinse" process with radial nozzle
ld-ltl-q- 9AIL.-D
Waste disposal contractor: Basin Oil Co., Inc.
EPANo.: WAD988477501
I.F.C.I., Licensed UST Decommissioning Supervisor on site:
Name: Toby D. Parker License No.: IFCI 1038004-26
--.- �z
Signature:7
--.A
OEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561
November 9, 2012
STREETF LE JN 12340
Extend icare-Alde rcrest Health and Rehabilitation
c/o Coates Design Architects
900 Winslow Way East, Suite 210
Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110
Attention: Bob Miller-Rhees via email: bob@coatesdesign.com
Subject: Transmittal Letter — Geotechnical Engineering Study
Proposed Physical Therapy Addition
Aldercrest Convalescent Center
21400 — 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
Dear Mr. Miller-Rhees:
We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed addition to be
constructed to the existing Extendicare Aldercrest facility in Edmonds, Washington. The scope of
our services consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing
this report to provide design criteria for new foundations and floors, This work was authorized by
your acceptance of our proposal, P-8486, dated October 29, 2012.
The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact
us if there are any questions regarding this report, or for further assistance during the design and
construction phases of this project.
cc: Extendicare — Daryl Daze
via email.- DDaze@extendicare.com
Extendicare — Lori Payette
via email: 1payette@buildingservice.com
JLH/MRM: jyb
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
W WA
, - A-0
Jason L. Hinds
Geotechnical Engineer
RECEIVED
DEC 0 6 2012
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COUNTER
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Proposed Physical Therapy Addition
Aldercrest Convalescent Center
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Seattle, Washington
This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for
the site of the proposed physical therapy addition to the existing Aldercrest Convalescent Center in
Edmonds.
We were provided with preliminary plans developed by Coates Design Architects, dated October
23, 2012. The plans included a floor plan and section drawings. Based on these plans, we
understand that a new addition for physical therapy will be constructed in the landscaped area
immediately west of the administrative offices in the central portion of the existing Aldercrest
facility. The north wall of the addition will adjoin the southern wall of the existing therapy room, and
the eastern wall of the new addition will parallel the western wall of the existing 'administration
offices. The addition is planned to be one-story, with a slab -on -grade floor. New columns may
also be added inside the existing therapy room, as the interior of that space is to be reconfigured.
If the scope of the project changes from what we have described above, we should be provided
with revised plans in order to determine if modifications to the recommendations and conclusions of
this report are warranted.
SITE CONDITIONS
SURFACE
The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site in Edmonds. The existing
Aldercrest Convalescent Center is located on the western side of 72nd Avenue West. The site
includes frontage along 72nd Ave West to the east, and is bordered to the south by a similarly
sized property developed with an assisted living center. To the west are multi -family apartment
buildings. The subject Site is mostly developed with the Aldercrest facility; which consists of three
interconnected wings and surrounding parking lots. The central portion of the facility includes the
main entrance, administration offices and therapy rooms. The western and eastern wings contain.
patient rooms. Small, grass lawn areas and landscaping beds surround the building. The overall
site slopes gradually down to the east-southeast. A short, moderate slope exists on the
southwestern corner of the site.
During our site investigation, signs of extensive settlement, including sloping and cracked slabs,
cracked foundation walls, and tilted framed openings, were observed throughout the entire eastern
wing, with significant settlement noticed in the northern portion of this building. We understand that
the building was o rig Lin-a&L-c-o-ostru cted over a "swc
imp_yLgma_and that much of the north portion
was supported ondatibn plan indicates that the existing entrance,
administrative offices, and therapy room were not supported on piles.,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aldercrest Health and Rehabilitation
November 9, 2012
SUBSURFACE
JN 12340
Page 2
The original test pits conducted before the current building was constructed were somewhat
inconclusive about the subsurface conditions in the area of the proposed addition. The observed
settlement in the eastern wing made these old explorations even somewhat more suspect. During
an initial visit to the site, we conducted two hand-augered borings in the area of the addition, and
found fill soils to the maximum 4-foot depth that was explored.
To better assess the subsurface conditions below this fill, we oversaw the drilling of four test
borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration
program was based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those
encountered during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The borings were
drilled on November 5, 2012 using a small track -mounted, hollow -stem auger drill. Samples were
taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split -spoon sampler, which has
a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The
number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil
density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process,
logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test
Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 6.
Soil Conditions
The test borings were drilled in the landscaped area west of the main entrance. The test
borings generally encountered native silt beneath a layer of topsoil or fill. This upper layer
of loose soils was 3 to 6 feet thick. The fill contained varying amounts of silt, sand,
organics, and gravels. Beneath the fill and topsoil, we found native silt that varied in its
density. In Borings 1, 2 and 4, the silt was very stiff, but it was quite soft to a depth of
approximately 15 feet in Boring 3.
No obstructions were revealed by our explorations. However, debris, buried utilities, and old
foundation and slab elements are commonly encountered on sites that have had previous
development. We observed a storm catch basin in the west side of the planned addition
area, with a pipe leading toward the west from the catch basin.
Groundwater Conditions
Perched groundwater was observed in the upper, loose fill and topsoil in all of the test
borings. This is water that has percolated downward until it reaches the low permeability
silt. Deeper groundwater seepage was also observed beneath approximately 15 feet in
three of the four test borings. The test borings were left open for only a short time period.
Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage
and may not indicate the static groundwater level. Groundwater levels encountered during
drilling can be deceptive, because seepage into the boring can be blocked or slowed by the
auger itself. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and
other factors.
The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the
exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface
conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface
information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aldercrest Health and Rehabilitation JN 12340
November 9, 2012 Page 3
on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on. the conditions observed during
drilling.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GENERAL
THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A
GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY, MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE
CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY REL YING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD
READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT.
The test borings conducted for this study encountered stiff native silts at approximately 8 to 15 feet
beneath the existing ground surface on the northern side of proposed addition, near the existing
therapy room, and at shallower depths of approximately 3 feet along the south edge of the addition.
It appears that the competent, stiff native soils slepe rather steeply down toward the north. Due to
the significantly loose condition of the upper fill soils, and the varying depth to competent native
soils, we recommend that thq entire new addition be supnorted on a deep foundation system. Due
to the relatively small footprint and work area, trying to utilize conventional footings for just the
south side of the new construction is likely not practical. Deep foundatlons should also support the
new floor, and be planned for any new foundations constructed inside the existing building.
Several different deep foundation types are feasible for the site conditions. Considering the size of
the project, depth to competent native soils, and limited working room, we believe that small -
diameter §teel I�ip�_ piles or helical anchors are likely the most feasible foundation elements.
Typically, small -diameter steel pipe piles are less expensive than helical anchors. However, the
piles are driven to a refusal criteria set by resistance met during driving; and due to their small
diameter, pile lengths can sometimes be significantly greater than the required depth of helical
anchors. Also, the piles are driven using a hydraulic impact hammer, causing considerable noise.
Helical anchors are screwed into the ground using a hydraulic motor, resulting in a quieter
installation process. Both of these foundation systems can be installed inside the existing therapy
space to support new loads.
It is likely that some settlement of the ground surrounding and beneath the pile -supported addition
will occur over time. In order to reduce the potential problems associated with this, we recommend
the following:
Connect all in -ground utilities beneath the floor slabs to the pile -supported floors or
grade beams. This is intended to prevent utilities, such as sewers, from being pulled out
of the floor as the underlying soils settle away from the slab. Hangers or straps can be
poured into the floors and grade beams to _carry he pipin 'The spTcin6 R 66ie
.. ................. li-n'g el-e-m-e'ln'ts - �n L_ _ g��
suppoi will d�p �c�n_ the distance that the pipe material can span
unsupported.
Construct all entrance walkways as reinforced slabs that are doweled into the grade
beam at the door thresholds. This will allow the walkways to ra�i_p �domin �na_Eiwa7r_o__m_"
i—he 'buiicringas they settre—,without causing a downset at the threshold.
Isolate on -grade elements, such as walkways or pavements, from pile -supported
foundations and columns to allow differential movement.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aidercrest Health and Rehabilitation JN 12340
November 9, 2012 Page 4
The near -surface soils will be soft and muddy, and difficult to work on. It would be prudent to place
a layer of clean crushed rock, quarry spalls, or railroad ballast on the excavated subgrade to
reduce construction difficulties and to limit the potential for silty runoff leaving the excavation. The
erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the weather
conditions that are encountered. We anticipate that a silt fence will be needed around the
downslope sides of any cleared areas. Soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic during wet
weather. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or hydroseed bare areas that will
not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious surface. Additional erosion control
measures may be necessary to address the conditions encountered during the actual construction
process.
Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the
recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan
review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include
revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical
constraints that become more evident during the review process.
We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report
should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and
recommendations.
SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS
In accordance with the International Building Code (IBC), the site soil profile within 100 feet of the
ground surface is best represented by Site Class Type D (Stiff Site Class). As noted in the USGS
website, the mapped spectral accelerari-o'n--valo6lor —a0.2 second (S,) and 1.0 second period (Si)
equals 1.20g and 0.42g, respectively. The site soils that will support the foundation and floor slabs
have a T,6wpoten Fia-10-Ei6ismic liquefaction because of their dense nature.
PIPE PILES
A 2-inch-diameter pipe —pile driven with a minimum 90-pound jackhammer or a 140-pound Rhino
hamme-r-t-o-a `Tfinal penetration rate of 1-inch or less for one minute of continuous driving may be
assigned an allowable compressive load <�ns. Extra -strong (Schedule 80) steel pipe should be
used for 2-Inch diameter piles.
Three-inch diameter pipe piles driven with a 650- or 800- or 1, 1 00-pound hydraulic jackhammer to
the following final penetration rates may be assigned the following compressive capacity.
INSIDE FINAL DRIVINC FINAL DRIVING FINAL DRIVING ALLOWABLE
PILE RA'rE RAIIIE, RATE COMPRESSIVE
DIAMETER (650-pound haninier) . (800-pound 11:11111ner) (t,tOO-Vound hanumer) CAPACI'rV
Note: The refusal criteria indicated In the above table are valid only for pipe piles that are
installed using a hydraulic impact hammer carried on leads that allow the hammer to sit on
the top of the pile during driving. If the piles are installed by alternative methods, such as a
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aldercrest Health and Rehabilitation
November 9, 2012
JN 12340
Page 5
vibratory hammer or a hammer that is hard -mounted to the installation machine, numerous
load tests to 200 percent of the design capacity would be necessary to substantiate the
allowable pile load. The appropriate number of load tests would need to be determined at
the time the contractor and installation method are chosen.
For 3-inch diameter piles, a minimum Schedule 40 pipe should be used. The site soils should not
be highly corrosive. Considering this, it-i—s—duropi—ni8n that standard "black" pipe can be used, and
corrosion protection, such as galvanizing, is not necessary for the pipe piles.
Since the piles are installed to specific final driving rates, it is difficult to accurately estimate
required pile lengths, especially in fine-grained soils. Based on the test borings, it is likely that the
piles on the northern side of the addition will be deeper than the southern piles.. Pile lengths of
approximately 30 to 35 feet may be required on the northern side, while the southern piles could be
20 to 25 feet in length. Pile end caps and capped couplers could be used to help limit required pile
lengths.
Pile caps and grade beams should be used to transmit loads to the piles. Isolated pile caps should
include a minimum of two piles to reduce the potential for eccentric loads being applied to the piles.
Subsequent sections of pipe can be connected with slip or threaded couplers, or they can be
welded together. If slip couplers are used, they should fit snugly into the pipe sdctions. This may
require that shims be used or that beads of welding flux be applied to the outside of the coupler.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by passive earth pressure acting on the
vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For this condition, the foundation must be either
poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or surrounded by level, structural fill. We
recommend using a passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for this resistance. If
the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will
not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to
lateral loading, when using the above ultimate passive value.
HELICAL ANCHORS
Helical anchors consist of single or multiple helixes that are rotated into the ground on the end of
round or square metal shafts. These anchors can be used to support both compression and
tension loads, but their lateral capacity is negligible due to the relatively small diameter of the metal
shafts, The design capacity of single helix anchors is the allowable soil bearing capacity on the
helix area. Multiple -helix anchors are typically assumed to have a design capacity equal to the
sum of the allowable bearing capacity on each helix, if they are separated more than three helix
diameters. Buckling of the shaft may limit the design load, and we recommend that the shaft be
analyzed for buckling assuming no lateral soil support, as the installation of the anchor will disturb
the soil in the vicinity of the shaft.
The minimum diameter of a single helix anchor is 8 inches. The ultimate capacity of the anchor in
tension or compression can be estimated roughly by multiplying the installation torque by 10. We
recommend that the helix be installed at least 10 feet into medium stiff to stiff native silt soil. We
estimate that an allowable axial compressive capacity of at least 6 tons can be achieved using an
8-inch single helix. Higher capacities can be obtained by using multiple helixes or single helixes
with larger diameters. The anchors should be installed by a specialty contractor familiar with
design and installation of chance systems. The contractor can assist with refining the anchor
design and details and estimating capacities for different soil and anchor conditions.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aldercrest Health and Rehabilitation JN 12340
November 9, 2012 Page 6
We recommend that anchors at the south end of the addition extend no less than 10 feet below the
existing grade, and at least 15 feet below existing grade on the north wall of the addition. The
anchors may have to extend deeper to reach refusal. However, if anchors reach effective refusal
sooner than these recommended depths, it can be reviewed in the field by the geotechnical
engineer.
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS
Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures
imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain
level backfill:.
PARikMETER VALUE
Active Earth Pressure * 40 pef
Passive Earth Pressure 250 pcf
Soil Unit Weight 120 pcf
Where: (I) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (11) active and
passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid
pressures.
* For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times Its
height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height
of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid
pressure.
The values given above are to be used to design only permanent foundation and retaining walls
that are to be backfilled, such as conventional walls constructed of reinforced concrete or masonry.
It is not appropriate to use the above earth pressures and soil unit weight to back -calculate soil
strength parameters for design of other types of retaining walls, such as soldier pile, reinforced
earth, modular or soil nail walls. We can assist with design of these types of walls, if desired. The
values for friction and passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor.
We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above
values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5
times the wall height from corners or bends in the walls. This is intended to reduce the amount of
cracking that can occur where a wall is restrained by a corner.
The design values given above do not Include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the
walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent
foundations will be exerted on the walls. -if these conditions exist, those pressures should be added
to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need
to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate
design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining
and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed
for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment.
Wall Pressures Due to Seismic Forces
The surcharge wall loads that could be imposed by the design earthquake can be modeled
by adding a uniform lateral pressure to the above-recom mended active pressure. The
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aldercrest Health and Rehabilitation
November 9, 2012
JN 12340
Page 7
recommended surcharge pressure is 7H pounds per square foot (psf), where H is the
design retention height of the wall. Using this increased pressure, the safety factor against
sliding and overturning can be reduced to 1.2 for the seismic analysis.
Retainina Wall Backfill and Waterproofin
Backflll placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free -draining
structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt
or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of
particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The on -site soils
are not free -draining, and should not be used for wall backfill, except in the upper 12 to 18
inches.
The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a
retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the
wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively
impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also
slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into
the backfill. The subgrade beneath pervious surfaces, such as pavers and permeable
pavement, must also slope away from foundatlon walls.
It is critical that the wall backfill be placed in lifts and be properly compacted, in order for the
above-recom mended design earth pressures to be appropriate. The wall design criteria
assume that the backfill will be well -compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The
compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand -operated
equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur
during compaction.. The section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains
additional recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill
behind retaining and foundation walls.
The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof below -grade walls, or to
prevent the formation of mold, mildew or fungi in interior spaces. Over time, the
performance of subsurface drainage systems can degrade, subsurface groundwater flow
patterns can change, and utilities can break or develop leaks. Therefore, waterproofing
should be provided where future seepage through the walls is not acceptable. This typically
includes limiting cold -joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or
membranes on the outside of the walls. There are a variety of different waterproofing
materials and systems, which should be installed by an experienced contractor familiar with
the anticipated construction and subsurface conditions. Applying a thin coat of asphalt
emulsion to the outside face of a wall is not considered waterproofing, and will only help to
reduce moisture generated from water vapor or capillary action from seeping through the
concrete. As with any project, adequate ventilation of basement and crawl space areas is
important to prevent a build up of water vapor that is commonly transmitted through
concrete walls from the surrounding soil, even when seepage is not present. This is
appropriate even when waterproofing is applied to the outside of foundation and retaining
walls. We recommend that you contact a specialty consultant if detailed recommendations
or specifications related to waterproofing design, or minimizing the potential for infestations
of mold and mildew are desired.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aidercrest Health and Rehabilitation
November 9, 2012
FLOOR SLABS
A 12340
Page 8
The building floors should be constructed as structural slabs on pile supported grade beams. Even
where the exposed soils appear dry, water vapor will tend to naturally migrate upward through the
soil to the new constructed space above it. This can affect moisture -sensitive flooring, cause
imperfections or damage to the slab, or simply allow excessive water vapor into the space above
the slab. All interior slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer
consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of gravel or crushed rock that has a fines content
(percent passing the No. 200 sieve) of less than 3 percent and a sand content (percent passing the
No. 4 sieve) of no more than 10 percent.
As noted by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab
Structures, proper moisture protection is desirable Immediately below any on -grade slab that will be
covered by tile, wood, carpet, impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture -sensitive equipment or
products. ACI also notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil plastic sheeting, have been used in
the past, but are now recommending a minimum 1 0-mil thickness. A vapor retarder is defined as a
material with a permeance of less than 0.3 perms, as determined by ASTIVI E 96. It is possible that
concrete admixtures may meet this specification, although the manufacturers of the admixtures
should be consulted. Where vapor retarders are used under slabs, their edges should overlap by
at least- 6 inches and be sealed with adhesive tape. The sheeting should extend to the foundation
walls for maximum vapor protection. If no potential for vapor passage through the slab is desired, a
vapor barrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water
transmission rate of 0.01 perms when tested in accordance with ASTIVI E 96. Reinforced
membranes having sealed overlaps can meet this requirement.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS
Foundation drains should be used where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure,
(2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a
building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth-retainlng walls. These drains should
be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non -woven,
geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a
perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a
crawl space, and It should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept
separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate
7. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface
drains.
Underslab drainage should also be provided where (1) a crawl space will slope or be lower than the
surrounding ground surface, (2) an excavation encounters significant seepage, or (3) an excavation
for a building will be close to the expected high groundwater elevations. We can provide
recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and
foundation construction.
As a minimum, a vapor retarder, as defined in the Slabs -On -Grade section, should be provided in
any crawl space area to limit the transmission of water vapor from the underlying soils. Also, an
outlet drain is recommended for all crawl spaces to prevent a build up of any water that may
bypass the footing drains.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aldercrest Health and Rehabilitation JN 12340
November 9, 2012 Page 9
Groundwater was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it
should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French
drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of
the excavation.
The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away
from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations,
slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should
slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. This includes the subgrades for
pervious surfaces. Surface drains should be provided where necessary to prevent ponding of
water behind foundation or retaining walls.
LIMITA TIONS
The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as
they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions
encountered in the test. borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site., If the
subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those
observed In our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions
and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated conditions are commonly
encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking samples in test
borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected
conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed
project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate
such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Extendicare and its representatives, for
specific application to this project and site. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional
opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services
and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our
services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our
recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or
procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Our services
also do not include assessing or minimizing the potential for biological hazards, such as mold,
bacteria, mildew and fungi In either the existing or proposed site development.
ADDITIONAL SERMES
In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide
geotechhical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm
that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate
whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the
recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the
event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction.
However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the
contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements,
will be the responsibility of the contractor.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Extendicare-Aldercrest Health and Rehabilitation JN 12340
November 9, 2012 Page 10
During the construction phase, we will provide geotechnical observation and testing services when
requested by you or your representatives. Please be aware that we can only document site work
we actually observe. It is still the responsibility of your contractor or on -site construction team to
verify that our recommendations are being followed, whether we are present at the site or not.
The following plates are attached to complete this report:
Plate I Vicinity Map
Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan
Plates 3 - 6 Test Boring Logs
Plate 7 Typical Footing Drain Detail
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project, If you have any questions, or if we
may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us.
JLH/MRM: jyb
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
�e
Jason L. Hinds
Geotechnical Engineer
Marc R. McGinnis, P.'(.'
Principal
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
(Source: MIcrosoft Streets and TrIps, 2004)
VICINITY MAP
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
Job No - Date: Plate:
1,2340 1 Nov. 2012 1 1 17
air
B-4
Existog IvIagnone I
I:t'�W I
Grass Lawn
B-1
z
ORO-
R
XT
Porte-coch6re
GEOTECH
CONSUUFANTS, INC.
9 I'm
Stone Walkway
-ft-,
z B-3
10
Existing Aldercrest Building
Main Entrance
SITE EXPLORATION PLAN
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
Job No: Date: Plate:
12340 1 Nov. 2012 1 No Scale 1 2
10
27 1
38 2
BORING I
Description
Dark brown to black, organic silt and topsoil over;
Light brown, mottled with orange, sandy silt, moist, loose (FILL)
FILL
_layer of organics over,
Orange -brown sand with gravel, very moist, loose (FILL)
Light brown, mottled with orange, sandy SILT with gravel, non -plastic, very
moist to wet, very sbff
-becomes light gray, very stiff
-becomes olive brown with minor rusting, only trace small gravels
-with very fine grained sand
T
37 51 -with fine to medium grained sand, wet
Test boring was terminated on November 6, 2012 at 16.6 feet.
Minor perched groundwater was encountered from about 2.5 to 4.5 feet,
and groundwater seepage was encountered at approximately 15.0 feet
201 during drilling.
25
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
TEST BORING LOG
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
Job Date: Logged by. Plate:
12340 Nov. 2012 JLH :3
"o S CP&
co-§'e
5
10
M
15
20
26
3
7
22
16
IM
37
BORING 2
Description
Dark black, organic silt and topsoil over;
Blue -gray, clayey silt with some organics, very moist to wet, soft (FILL)
FILL
-dark brown to black organic layer over;
21 layer of pea gravel, wet
-1 JML -becomes light gray, stiff
Light gray, mottled with orange, sandy SILT, low plasficity, moist, loose to
1 medium stiff
14
15 1111 ML
-wetsandlens
6 -with medium grained sand interbeds, becomes very stiff
Test boring was terminated on November 5, 2012 at 21.5 feet.
Perched groundwater was encountered from approximately 2.5 feet to
6.0 feet during drilling, and within wet sand fans at 11.0 feet.
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
TEST BOMG LOG
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
I Job
Logged b
-1
jDate:
12340
Nov. 2012 ]
irkiplate:
4
5
10
is
20
'71P
� I
4
14
8
8
30
C.'e,
BORING 3
Description
Dark brown organic silt with wood and organics, wet loose (FILL)
FILL I Light brown, mottled with orange, sandy silt, low plasticity to slightly plastic,
very moist to wet, soft (FILL)
-layer of gravel over;
2 FILL, Light brown, mottled with orange, sandy silt, low plasticity to slightly plastic,
_ I very moist to wet, soft (FILL)
Light gray to blue -gray, very sandy SILT, low plasticity, very moist, soft
1 3 1
1 1111
11113
1 5 1111111111 -becomes wet, very stiff
• Test boring was terminated on November 5, 2011 at 16.5 feet.
• Groundwater was encountered perched at 2.6 feet to 6.5. feet, and below
15.0 feet during drilling.
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
TEST BORING LOG
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
Job DatG: Logged b plate:
12340 Nov 2012 JLH 5
jo
5
10
15
20
25
141
1 26
1 15
1 27
18
61 1
BORING 4
Description
Dark brown Topsoil and organic SILT, wet, soft
1 Light brown, mottled with orange, sandy SILT with small gravels, non -plastic,
moist, very stiff
2 -becomes light gray
3 L -no gravel, very sandy silt, less stiff
41 -becomes light brown with rusting
I-becomes light gray
-gray, slightly silty SAND, fine to medium grained, wet, medium
5 Gray to blue
dense
11
-becomes very dense
Test boring was terminated on April 19, 2011 at 21.6 feet.
Perched groundwater was encountered at 1.6 to 3 feet, and seepage was
found beloe 16 feet during drilling. I
GEOTECH
CONSUILTAWS, INC.
TEST BORING LOG
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
Job DatG: Logged by: Plate:
12340 1 Nov . 2012 1 JLH I
Slope backfill away from
foundation. Provide surface
drains where necessary.
Backfill
(See text for
requirements)
Nonwoven Geotextile
Filter Fabric
Washed Rock
(7/8" min. size)
4.
0 o'
�"o
11 71 "11 IN I KIM
Tightline Roof Drain
(Do not connect to footing drain)
Possible Slab
4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe
(invert at least 6 inches below
slab or crawl space. Slope to
drain to appropriate ouffall.
Place holes downward.)
.10.113-.0 43
C' - D ..0 1 '. D - -
50 53,
0.
610 00 00 00
L' 0 :� 3 0 0 0
L
.0 -0
-0 .0
Vapor Retarder/Barr ' ier and
Capillary Break/Drainage Layer
(Refer to Report text)
NOTES:
(1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that
bypasses the perimeter footing drains.
(2) Refer to report text for additional drainage, waterproofing, and slab considerations.
GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL
21400 - 72nd Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington
Job No: I Date: Plate:
12340 Nov. 2012 1 1 :7
J N.
Pe
*r:;A
7 1 j.
2w--Ik.
.. WTI
------ V-1
_c:^,4 4^8
!7" ail �Ivvf- N orew
v c-
;,tau'l �,.*u
I
mji
V01.
IA
—A
.0cps
s tv L
T.
241e
tj
7t':�) 61e
aoapv-
lj�e
26
ot
r
k/
QDi
UB
14ES
...........
wG o I
CD
C4
M - )ING DEPAMUENT
C14. -.02L. LT— BUC'LID4 OF EDMONDS
CD P 94
tr -
s - -,S�jr
*apt
Al.
4T"
.-77Z
77'
L-01
Ives �v-t
6�-e,H�a- -7—
C4
11of e k,1j?4k1e'-fl
E D
RECEIV
FEB 2 8 2005
PERMIT COUNTER
k uy liviv fl%JVIF-rl
2-4
k.
I
N.2
0
C--
05
ul
rq
rri
m
:-'B 18 '05
16:23
t-eD-ld-UO 4:U4rM; rage elz
4 4,4 t W46
4256?20984
PAGE. 02
m
0
Grease Interceptor Slizing Worksheet
Facility Name: A/rJev-r,re_9i /Yecdf� Y_ Re-ka, centp-C,
Address: 2_1Y00 7Z'� 6a, F_01,n0),,dS 5.POZ(. -Suite No.:
• A Grease Interceptor permit is required ($365.00 fbe). Contact the Pretreatment Technician
(425-672-5755) if you have any questions and also to get signature approval on this form-
• Per Edmonds City Code the rninimurn sized Grease Interceptor pen-nitted is 500 gallons.
Mao-dEdins ii&d- ii-iff is _4,_0 0 0 - gab n s-.
NUMBER OF MEALS SERVED AT PEAK T(OUR
Based on the fowl number of seats and average time per meaL
Lounge and bar seating is counted at 20%.
WASTE FLOW RATE (Choose one)
With Dishwashing Machine ....... . ............. 6 gallon flow
Without Dishwashing Machine ................ 5 ganon flow
Single Service Kitchen' . ............................. 2 gallon flow
(Food Waste Disposer ....................... add I gallon flow)
RETENTION TIMES (Choose one)
• Commercial Kitchen Dishwasher ............. 2.5 hours
• Single Service Kitchen* ............................. 1.5 hours
STORAGE FACTORS (Choose one)
* Full Service Kitchen 0-12 hour operation: .......... I
0 Full Service Kitchen 12-20 hour operation: ........ 2.
0 Full Service Kitchen 24 hour operation: ............. 3
0 Single Service Kitchen,": ...................................... 1.5
& (Alternate factor for occasional use kitchen ......... .
A = 116
B= _ 6
C = 2_ 5
D
Minimum Interceptor Size (liquid capaciq) A x B x C x D /740
.*A single service kitchen refers to a restaurant where disposable dishware is used and
dishwashing operations are therefore great�y reduced.
6
(For City use otily below this line)
�R
Remarks. j
Gk. r-M t r-QT J r 4'nk- ChA P )d I
_f Ll Ar
4am ii Ply-
T
rn Ae- 1A CP-O(
C-7 J
4 0
M
son
Size Approved.�� /70D gal. Approved by: 0 1/
r83 4 .�� W -, Date: .5
C= Alretrea nt Te6nidan
M
-reb. 2004]
STREET FILE
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
Grease Removal Equipment Application
Business Name: Atate Submitted:
Address.- 11LAW-110-D
ffD& Suite No-:
.-A
Business Owner. aiilng.-Address,-M"I.)C;U"�<e-e-.
Contact Person/Ti tic: Phone: -%OW 4K�, S 49 G
Days/Hours of Operation-.
Total Number of Meals Served Per Peak Hour (assume all seats filled);_Ji�_p
Number of Seats- Dinin,-,, 116 Lounge/Bar: L3� Banquet Rooths:AJLV_� Deck/Patio: qVi
'Blij1ding Occupancy Permit Capacity: Health Dept Permit Capacity
In
Inventory of Kitchen Equipment and Plumbing Flixtures ror this Establishment: (Grills,
burners, ovens, hoods, deep fat fryers, wok stations, soup kettles, sinks,,pre-wash sinks,
dishwashers, disposers, mop sinks, floor drains, etc.) 1-6 A�
-'ro'._'A ewe" 3:�_i �—Vs I
What. proportion, if any, of the dishware used is of the d isposabletype?.
Flow is waste oil/gresse handled, stored, and recycled/disposed?
a Sop, -is 4K J
+ 6r re 0 ')�t ti� e
job -
Estimate gallons of waste oil/grease produced per month: -L
-k ec :g^c
If recycled, by which company? '01i 1)
ND
How a vent hoods cleaned and where does the cleaning waste go?.
40
Contact the Pretreatment Technician at 425-672-5 755 to discuss the type and
size of equipmentyou must install, and then complete the appropriate
accompanying worksheetfor either a Greaie Interceptor or a Grease Trap.
i= C:)
C--)
00 -,+mx rh4y te a P-e R.
17,4 AJ 1111W OeAMY 4<�4
m F�M4 M K I S -rO 6c- -CX91
C=
C= "A
rn -W- 00
F4 k0t
rILE
June 3, 1977
MEMO TO: Harry Whitcutt
Building Official
VIA: E. Joseph Wallis, Director
Community Development Department
FROM: Leif R. Larson, Director
Public Works Department
SUBJECT: ALDERCREST CONVELESCENT CENTER
It is our understanding that your office is holding
Bond #815 9460 DCA for the subject project. The site
work has now been completed to the Public Works Depart-
ment's satisfaction.
Therefore, Ms. Della Bradley, of Marsh & McLennan,
Inc. has requested a letter from your department authoriz-
ing release of that Bond.
RHA: j t
6.La
Johnson 'Dt. Alren '41 4n.'�V.
-7 �7
A/
7,-
p 7' VVi F:�-o
Ae7—
ILI
T7 gs7- Ae-L,099
I A.0. RI! ga=�7-6oOPA—> A000-'t t t Or
I
Me 1—,=—Ao"A0e1qolV, Z—Ae
I P
A I
+
1 4 +
-�W-
4w 0 0 4CL
PIPI "Jr / /0*01 f .4-
,2 4r/v-bf -,-v IWO --3 Q 1.5
*i *w O/Y-z A -7 X t-7 Q/ A MS -A 4d
lbeA af -4 bvM
5P -2 9 1-ve C) - 7
VIA 0 S gcq
015 "*Xa A f r.#OY
0 2F 0
'007
19 4 _;p a-4 T V-4,1025 a(
"4 400--7 47 A a =1 49
9 -.0y e /Y --� 47 67 -:=I
2/ o7aA 0 IAO TAWM
/W 0 rie aoAOu4a2j
4d 5 rfzTtl -J -7 bpe
1-76
REET F L
�c K,
el> 7—H 6- X 4Er 9E V ds*s"
z X---�Oasp- 13 v ML06.
Z-vc-*f 17 4 %Ali 7.44 oqj�pe' A107"tc.-M.S
Y t> 4- 7- 95,C0 y 1 +7 4w
772�p 4r L> e�p 7ft; X AdO' I C Ag r I A-e
.51-4 0 VL-0 4,+**.0 k.*l r 0,,q r-*q 7-0 Lft
L/
T"H oE— C-- ce - - Z-
)= , � X- cp � *-n
An Jr-m s P. 4? i=
X- "S fo. 6 77- 9 - 7 to
7
L AIAI
..)- -r- 4 lar
A/ 71-1-w -7- Z 1- 7 6 .4w E-'**Pl v
CO,&l V Lw--- .0
(2 A/ 4M--
Cm I sm. z-- 0 . 0
T 0
FORM 41 LITTLE'S
*INTE1WFFI'CE COMMUPOATI IP?
DATE, J u I y 8 19 76
Engineering_'Ia��-1'17-1-ell FROM
Bui Iding
RE
SU,S.JECT: Danmor.Company [flgr. gait
215th and 216th and 72nd Avenue West
We have made a final inspection of the project at the above
locaflon.
Has the paving been completed to'.your satisfaction?
C Af
C S1W
C.
9
M'19A'#1e51 HIP
z 1,4
R T- INTER. OFFICE COMMUN.-.-ATIONS
T . 0 building Departm-nt
iUBJECT: ALDERCRECI
ST ro.!4VALESCENT. CFf,'Tr-.R
DATE —Jul,
y--�21,
FROM Dick Allen,
Fngineering Depart6ent
19 --- 76-
In reference to your merno of -Jjjj y Sth, we have the follov.iinn iters to�
report zs ',.)einj incomplete:
1. Grout catch basins.
Clean catch"basins and catch hasin manholes.
3. Raise the fire hydrant at the riorthi-,-est corner of.72d' Avenue ?-.21()th
Street to finished grade.
In addition it sh*o0d be noted that the workmenship on the si0ewalk construction
was very.poor. Ylease.transnit this information to the bijilder for completion,.
prior to finali:'z'ihg the bluilding permit..
RECETVED
SEP 2476
CITY OFF EDMONM
.PLANN
DANMOR CONSTRUCTION, INC. am X�PT.
General Contractors
I
September 22, 1976
City of Edmonds
Planning Department
250 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Re: Danmor Construction, Inc. '- Improvement Bond
Gentlemen:
Be advised that all off -site work has been completed as required
by you on the Madison Aldercrest Convalescent Center 'and the
Madison Aldercrest Retirement Apartment Complex, located at
21400 - 72nd Avenue West and 21500 - 72nd Avenue West, respec-
tively, in the City of Edmonds.
With this in mind I would appreciate receiving notification from
you that our improvement bond has.been released so that we may
discontinue payment of the premiums. Should you need additional
information or if there is some problem of which I am not aware,
please contact me.
Sincerely,
DANMOR CONSTRUCTI�O� INC.
Richard G. Hines
Chief Estimator/Project Manager
RGH: kc
Copy: Hank Sander, Marsh McLennan, Inc.
SUITE 500-THE 400 BUILDING -400 -108TH N.E. BELLEVUE, WN. 98004- PHONE: (206) 454-3331
IS
IN" -,At OFFICE COMMUN,,,,,
DATE--,3111Y�1?3, ----1 9-7-6-
FILE
TO Building Department EgT FROM r,)i ck Al I en
I Engineering Department
SUBJECT: ALDERCREST CONVALESCENT CENTER
In reference to your memo of July 8th, we have the following iter's to
rep, as being incomplete:
1. Grout catch basins.
2. Clean catch basins and catch basin manholes.
3. Raise the fire hydrant at the northwest corner of 7?d Avenue & 216th
Street to finished grade.
In addition it should be noted that the workmanship on the sidewalk construction
was very poor. Please transmit this information to the builder for completion
prior to finalizing the building perm -it.
— — ---------
,R)iA:mjr
GEnERALTELEPHonE compAnvGF THE noRTHLuEsT, ine.
6717 - 212th S.W., P.O. BOX 68, LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036
RECEIVED
October 16, 1974 OCT 2 1 1974
Edmonds Engr- DePt.
City Engineers
250 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Attention: Mr. William J. Nims
Dear Sir:
RIGHT-OF-WAY INVASION PERMIT #74-156 - W.O. 210-387274
In the above mentioned permit General Telephone Company of the Northwest is
the only Utility specified. Since the approval, the Snohomish County
PUD #1 desires to be included jointly on the same permit with General
Telephone, as prime contractor.
General Telephone Company of the Northwest desires the permit to include
Snohomish County PUD joint in the trench just along the west side of
72nd Ave. W., only as illustrated on attached drawings.
The city should bill the PUD for their portion of this permit, if applicable.
Very truly y rs,
W. C. ill
Engine ring and Construction Supervisor /-2/
ell
A part of General Telephone & Electronics
'jHLE'
+ f
O'� 779� "ALP., 4ge'.SL 7-4
Z--,ep Al
t
L�v
0Q A
JAI_ _X A/_ 7 Z, r7y
)v op ft v
� / 5 i P.
Z�0009"L� ool�
Y
W_ AP7"
143; 49Q I IV[ 004�t__40 4w 1 a—z &,Lw
7� ;AA
wioo'A 9=*
Atoo'em;
o V
o4P, 44 �,r V, A� -e-- D
"rip
4
IA/
4AM AP
10 )C7- ;V Aoo'Al WOP 47 Ap
�'7 4..,
W -1 T-1—
ir
41
4
V
,aEET f && OF EDMONDS
0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
505 BELL STREET
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
APPLICATION FOR INVASION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
(Submit In Duplicate)
Permit to be issued to: UniversU Utility.:Conitiacto.rs, Inc,
For work at: (address or vicinity) Aldercrest Conva1scent Center and Retirement Home at
216th Street.S.W. & 72nd Ave..-�iest
Type of work I to be do,, '8�Lnitary Se . wer Storm Sewer, Water Line, And Pavin,-,
(Attach Drawing When Applicable)
Owner: b��rior Construction, Inc,
Name
400 - 108th Ave. N.E.
Mailing Address
Bellevue Washington
City State
454-3331
Telephone Number
Contractor:. Universal Utility Contractors, Inc..
Name
8631 - 242nd S.W.
Mailing Address
Edmonds, Washington 774-9042
City State Telephone Number
JulY 10v 1974
Date Signed
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
Permit Issued (date) 7 Permit -Number
Remarks: "7'yo 2�re(114
%GINEER'S APPROVA
,n issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible Work subject -to inspection and restoration in accorden6e'
workmanship and materials for a period of one year with city code. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection:
owing inspection of the restoration by the Engineering Call 775-2525
t.
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Insp
Date -----------------
By .........................
Remarks
Insp
Date ........... .....
By ----------------------
..Remarks
7 ................................................... . ................
Insp
Date. ---------- .....
By ........................
Remarlrs - - .
............................. ...............................
Insp
Date. ----------------
By -------------------------
Remarl-,s
Final
................
BY--.-
----- . ............. Remarks
-pAffo*ev6v 41AIA10 45641&W (ARCC A41Aj;
0141itm -A.-
/607S#*�
QTP
INTER -OFFICE
COMMUNICATIONS
DATE July 9'."
.TO. J Herb Gi.1 bo'��
FROM Leif R. Larson
P6bl i bept.-
Ci ty Engineer
via:
George Johnson
raFIM 41 LITTLve
BubJECT: &b t Convalescent Centerz--:'
Alddr s
Forwarded herewith'is a set.of plans
for your
files on. subject project. The
p- lans are re'v sed as noted.
... ...
A
rf 4
Attachments
-MM 'A, -,ONS
It R-OFFI-C-E: CO., UF
DATE July 8 19 76
FLE,
�FROW. Bui Iding
TO Engineer.ing 'I�e
C E-D
FORM 41 - LITTLE'S '11a
SUBJECT: Danmor Company
fdfilollds
215th and 216th and .72nd Avenue -West DON.
We have made.a. fina-1,inspection of the project at the above
locatil,on.
Has the paving been completed to your satisfaction?
A/
.0 OAle%
L
Q. �,H
C,
7z
INT/'�-OFFICE COMMC"ICAT I 1'�N S
DATE June 14 19 74
LOE
TO Harry Whitcutt FROM Richard H. Allen
Building official Assistatit City Engineer,
FORM 41 - LITTLE'S
SUBJECT: Aldercrest Retirement Home
Please note that the building permit includes extensive utilities
and street work. Separate permits will be required for work with-
in the right-of-way. It is requested that the revisions as noted
on the plans be made to the original drawings by the developer
and a copy of the�revised sheets C 1,2,3, and 4 be.sent to our
office.
RHA: mj r
Attachments
&`V -'ETFILE 0
AMEN IT I ES DESIGN BOARD
February 27, 1 974
Thr.. regular meeting of the Amenities Design Board was called to order by Vice -
Chairman John Latourell in the absence of Chairman Margaret Bernhoft. ! lembe rs
present were fflke Rizzuto, Keith r�oldsmith and Don Westlin. Staff members pre-'
sent�were Joe Wallis, City Planner, Harry Whitcutt, Building Official, John
Wallace, City Attorney and Petie Hendrick, Secretary.
Chairman LatOUrell welcomed the people in the audience. ' He explained -the pro-
cedures of the Amenities Design Board and asked the audience to participate in
matters, that. were of interest to them.'
Mr. Wallis announced that two nembers of the Ad Hoc Design Committee were in
attendance for the first regular meeting, Paul Cook. and J. Ward Phillips.
ADB-1-74 L. L. Beio. Residential Condominium. 17 units. Between 5th and
6th on the South side of Alder St. (P�ffi)
Mr. Wallis reviewed the application and'showed slides of the site. Keith
Goldsmith,stepped down from the Board as Mr. Beigh had been his client.
Mr'. Beig'h.was in the audience. He presented his plans for review by the Board.
The plans had been redone following conferences with the Building and Planning
Department in order to reduce the height by 9 feet. The building is now 3 feet
under the maximum height. . r1r. Beigh was asked about the development of Alder
Street and he said it was -his understandinq that he would have to develop the
street to its full width.
John Latourell said one of his concerns was that a building as prominent as this
in this location could be seen for many miles and lie asked that the builder con -
Sider a different color other than white. A darker color would soften the im-
pact on the City. Mr. Westlin asked what the natural color of the brick was
and was told either grey or beige; Mr. Westlin said a stark white has an in,,ti-
tutional look.
Mr. Beigh showed a preliminary landscaping plan. The Board asked that Mr. Beigh
return with a more detailed landscaping plan and a lighting plan for the exterior
of the building.
Severali'peg le.dn the audience spoke about the power the Board.was weilding in
requiring!-tKat'a-devel'oper change color to th'eir,liking. Paul,. Cook,a� member
of the Ad Ho,c1,,Design,Committee asked that;the,Board keep ln'mind the charges
issued to�them'by the Ad Hoc Committeei. He said he felt"that-color ifaw'a ratt�r
of the,man putting -up the mbneyrto buildi To get ton -technical could.,cause de-
lays and they'ar6.verycostlyto the builder.
Mike Rizzuto suggested that the Board approve the plan of Mr. Beigh subject to,
the submission.of landscaping and lighting plans. Mr. Beigh said he had not had
much time to get a landscaping plan prior to this hearing.
Mr.,Rizzuto�,said he,fe t that the Boaro should not,4 I dictate'c6lori but should.ask
fur.,,6u4mis io �of several I in,090edtcolorsA, as, 1h1.UJj:WcU1d, nctAike- stpurple'601ding.
e_ n
A MOTION WAS MADE BY 111. WESTLIN, SECONDED BY MR. RIZZ!ITO TO ACCEPT THE PLAN OF
L. L. BEIGH. ABD-1-74, SUBJECT TO CLARIFYIN(1, ANI) SIJBqITTINr, LIGHTING AND LANDSCAP-
PAINTING THE BbILDING. Motion carried unanimously. -A 7
ING PLANS AND INDICATIUN OF QOWTH HEIGHT ')F PLA.,4TIN(;S AND A COLOR COLLAGE FOR
ABD-2-74 Danmor Co. Aldercrest Convalescent Center. Northwest corner 216th
St. S.W.-and.72nd Ave. West. (RMH)
t
ADB.- 3- A Dannior Co. Aldercrest Itetirement Apartnw-til-'.. Northwent, corner 2.16th
St..S.W. and 72 n d A v o . West. (Ift)
1973
Ev. 08PIL
December 20, 1973
Denmor Construction, Inc.
Suite 000,'The 400 Building. -
Bellevue, W"hingion -1 0800 ' 4
Attention: Mr. Ted Babinski
Gentlemen:
RerAildercreat Convalescent �Center
ZI(3 & Rn rentTe -W., Edmonds
This will respond to your request of November 20, 1973,
regarding a cost estimate for the above project. Following is an
estimate of the cost for the installation. of a.primary electric
distribution and street'light*ng,systea on 2166�8t.'-S.W. and 72nd
Avenue West:
le Labor*& material* $ 7,921.00
Engineering & design 223.00
3. TrahapottAtid'n'4 stores i'601.00
4. Adminisitation & supervision -
@ 2.5% bf above 243.63
5. Total"Ordito-i cost $ 9,988.63
6. i�as 1 3'Distric't's' participation 3.329.54
7. alince f '6 'others
r m 6,659.09
It should be emphasised.that the above figure'is for now
privAry 61actric,distribution,,only and does not.include individual
ro" r"
OON I
Bonn" Ceft"rections im. 4" December 20, 1973
electric services on private property or other utility undergrounding
Gostse
It should be further noted that Included In the cost estimate
are charges for installing ornavantal street lighting standards for six
400 vott mercury vapor luminaires.
In regards to the primary underground service from this under-
ground distribution "atom to your building, the following! will adviset
1, As shown on the attached drawing, the primary
underground service will commence at a handhole,
whiab the District will provide, located at the
northeast corner of the property. From this
point the primary underground will continue in
a westerly direction to the p&dmount transformer
location at the north side of the now building.
2. Znclosad are specifications concerning material,
standard of practices, ate. for this project. The
water Is required to be Installed on an outside
wall.
3. The requested 120/208 volt, three-phase, four -wire
service will be made available. Our standards for
this underground service require that the owner
provide a 36" deep ditch$ lay 3" minimum plastic
conduit (PVC) from the transformer handhold and Vad-
to the handhole to be provided by the District at
the northeast corner of the property. The PUD will
complete the job by pulling In the primary conductors
and making all primary connections for a cost to the
owner of $886.63 for labor and material. Advance
payment of this amottut should be made as soon as pos-
sible to "awe proper coordination.
4. After Inspection of the completed work and upon
receipt of proper ossaments, the PUD will purchase
from the owner the primary underground service fot
$768.00, which wipresents the equivalent overhead
aosto The TUD will sss� ownership and maintenance
of the primary underground system subject to a one-
year worknonsUp clause.
We hope this Information will be helpful to you, and if we any be
of further assistance* PIS&s* do not hesitate to call.
CC:C..4r. �Dick Allen
City of Edmonds
TOUTS very truly,
Jobn A. MacLeod
Comsercial Supervisor
South County Office
6�s
JAXI dr
beat Neeffe, ftlot 5WWsWRdA0d
1^ 'V,—M�sw
Aob-
AMW
Higgins, McCarty & Braune
16301 NE'Ith
Bellevue, Washington
Attention: Mr. Lgh-tm—Z wunders
Dear Sir;
December 18, 1973
Pursuant to Mr. Wunders request of this date, enclosed is
the City of Edmonds "Typical Street Section" for your information
In preparing plans for the inprovement of 72d Avenue in connection
with the proposed Aldercrest Nursing Rome. It is noted that the
construction must conform to the APVA Specifications.
It in requested that a representative of your firm come to
the Edmonds Engineering Department for specific requirements prior
to starting on the plans.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF EDMONDS
RICRAU H. ALLEN
Assistant City Engineer
rf
Enclosure
F LL": E"
M E M 0 R A N D U M
DATE: April 17, 1973
r .
tot -
TO: FILE
cc: T..
D.
Mortimer
L.
S.
Pavloff
FROM: R. E.'Coulter
L.
L.
Fish
R.
M.'Barger
RE: Utilities Meeting with City
of Edmonds
In attendance: L. Lance Fish
R. E. Coulter
Richard H. Allen, City Engineer
Claude V. Laws, P. E.
1. Existing 3011 diameter storm drain along 72nd Ave. West with 1211 diameter
stub at midway of site.
2. 81' diameter sewer existing no charge except for hook-up. Mr. Allen to
provide costing for hook-up.
3. Existing 1811 diameter forced sewer main for information only.
4. Existing 611 diameter water main along 216th at 108 p.s.i. This will have
to'be reduced to 60��:80 p.s.i. w/p.r.v. valve.
5. Danmor to construct 811 main from 6" in 216th, North to North end of property.
Fire hydrant on deadeind of new main.
6. Gas line is available at 1501 south of 212th along 72nd AVe. Mr. Wuerch
of Commercial Sales, Washington Natural Gas Co. MA2-6767.
C,
7. Power to be underground - no lines along 72nd - some service in 216th-,�, L,1601dl
check with John McCloud, Lynnwood office Commercial Dept. P.U.D. No. I gel Pol
Snoh----4--h County. They will coordinat-e. with General Telephone.
8. Water and sewer to be installed according to American Public Works
Association Standards 1969.
9. Drawings of utilities are available from:
Reid, Middleton, and Assoc.
Consultiiig Engineers & Surveyors'
324 Main St. Edmonds
1619 Pacific Ave., Everett
File #-2.162 (2 of 6)
10.. Water Meter City to purchase meter we pay City
City to determine pit size - we build
City to purchase detector set - we pay City
Utilities Meeting/Redmond
April 20, 1973
Page two
11. Jack Cooper, Fire Chiefs
Bud Klein, Assist. Fire Chief
12. Permit cost. Side se�er for retirement center $1260.00 -.cost for
nursing home being determined.
13. Water and sewer monthlyicharges $267.00 a month.
14. The City transmitted to us the.fo.1lowing:
Street & Utilities Cbnst.
Fire Prevention Code
Underground Elect. Ord.
Right -of -Way Ord.
Fire Dept. Requirements
Metered Rates
Blue Prints (Sewerage System)
REC
CQr OF EDMONDS
250 - 5Tm NORTH
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
POLICE DEPT. El FIRE DEPT.
REPLY REO I DATE
SUBJECT YES NO 4-2-73
Aldercrest Complex
Additional'
Following are preliminary requirements for proposed Aldercrest Complexi,
items May be required wherifinal plans are submitted.
1. Add fiie hydrants as marked on plans.
216th Street S,W., on 72hd Ave*
2. Provide 8 il�ch w'ater main from 212th Street S.W. to
t
3. provide minimum 20 foot access road entirely around complex for Fire Departmm,
M equipm�nt'*
-sprinkler 'system p
Al� 4, �,AiI outlined in State'and*-loical: d6des, complete automatic
talled. P siibmittea t'o'the�.
smoke detection system shall be ins lans shall be
Fire Marshal's Office prior to construction,
SIGNE
PLEASE
REPLY TO
evw
too
SiGNED''
DA rE
FORM NO. MEM. 88T
09
I
lb Z
04y
IqAff
0-01 051
4
Building Dep*ent
TO CW OF'EDMONDS
250 - 5TH NORTH
EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020
FLE
-ST "'LL
El POLICE DEPT. FIRE DEPT. -
SUBJECT REPLY RE101jDATE
0
YES NO
Aldercrest Complex 4-2-73
f F llowi�g',-are, preliminary requirements for proposed Aldercrest Complexio Additions&'
0
items may be required when final plans are submitted.
1. Add fire hydrants as marked onplans.
.20 :Provide 8 inch water main from 212th Street S.W. to 216th Street S,W. o�,72nd Ave,
3. Provide,minimum 20 foot access road entirely around complex for Fire Ddpartment
equipment.
1-4 4
4.- -As outlined in State aind'local Codes; complete automatic sprinkler system plus
smoke detection system shall be installed. Plans shall be.submitted to the
Fire Marshal's Office prior to constructiono
PLEASE TO ' SIGNE CA(
REPLY
4�1'7173
0 V Nor AM
!�c Inko ()Vf
4
DATE SIGNED
FORM NO. MEM. 88T
SEND PARTS I AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT, PART 1 IS RETURNED WITH REPLY
FULE
SM-TitnFMEERING REQUIREME14TS FOR COMM�/RCIAL
AND APARTMENT BUILDING PROJECTS
Name Aldercrest Nursing HomelEdmonds Convalescent Center
Date March 30, 1973
STREETS AND ACCE SS
1. Right -of -Way Requirements: None; 60-foot existing on 216th And 72d Ave
2. Road Bed Width: 25-foot paving width required on 72d (for future 40' width).,
Pave from new curb to existing paving on 216th St. S.W.
3. Turn Around: N/A
4. Sidewalks: Required on 216th-and 72d per City Standards
5. Parking strip: Required per City Standards
6. Access Easements: N/A
UTILITIES
1. Water Mains: Install 8" cast iron water main in 72d. from 216th to
north property line per City Standards
2. Fire Hydrants: As required per Fire Protection Ordinance & Fire Department
3. Sewers or Septic Tanks: Connection of all units to sanitary sewer required
4. Drainage: Install all necessary storm sewers and drainage facilities
per drainage plan and City Standards. Where drainage is across adjacent
private property, all parties having any ownership interest in the lands
being developed shall provide, as a restriction on the title running with
the ' land, that the City of Edmonds shall be held harmless from any and all
claims for damages which may be occasioned to adjacent land by reason of the
construction and operation of the drainage system, unless, releases of
damages and/or drainage easements are obtained from the other property owners
affected by said drainage. Any drainage problems created by change of contour
during development must be corrected prior to occupancy permits or release
of performance bond.' Final approval (or release of bond) will be withheld
until actual draLnage as.installed has been.inspected by the City Engineer.
Engineering Requirements for Commll
Ap�rtment Building Projects - Page 2
5. Utility Easements: N/A
6. Underground Utilities: To'be provided in accordance with Ordinance No. 1387.
Street lighting shall also be 'provided with the necessary street light
standards and underground wiring. Have wiring utilities submit plan for
service and street lighting.
TOPOGRAPHY
1. Excavation ' and Grading: Excavation and grading shall conform to the requirements
outlined in Chapter 70 of the,Uniform Building Code, latest adopted edition,
Vol. 1. Where extensive grading and fill are involved in the development, a
grading plan and specifications shall be prepared.
QUOTATION FROM THE CITY CODE REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS
11.02.025(f) Utilities and Street 1mgrovements. No building permit shall be
issued for the construction of any buildil-n-gor structure of any kind or
description unless the plans and specifications include the construction for
curbs. gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, necessary water lines, sewer lines, and
storm drainage necessitated by the new construction or improvement, to be built
to applicable City standards, provided, however, if found by the City Engineer
to be impractical to construct at the time of application for said building permit,
construction may be waived by the City Engineer and in lieu thereof a performance
bond filed with said engineer to cover the estimated cost of construction to City
standards for said improvements, provided further, in areas zoned single family-
r%esidential at the time of said application for building permit in which the
applicant has received final approval for a plat or sub -division and has compiled
with requirements therein i:ompliance with this subsection shall be deemed by
compliance with the sub -division or plat requirements.
COMMENTS
1. ConsuIt with City staff prior to submitting site plan for specific information.
2. Site plan to be prepared by licensed civil engineer and installation to be
supervised by same.
3. As -built plan required 'for utility and street improvements.
jity Engineer
Rev. April 2, '1971
THROUGH WARRANT #
RECEIT06 OF 1970 BOND ISSUC
Aop6 6, (ALSO REFLECTS REIMBURSZHZ11TS)
WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND ISSUiS
(Includes Federal and -State_ Reimbursements) -477z5 4�S
=A&R
7-�
-udg Fur Not, *Bmit6rT ALz Pox
jerPro
IN—
ject N me
Bond
Issue,
(4) z
if"
2"mw
1966---
-1967--.--
197o
20TA4�___
Estimate..*__
Da
te
Non
C harge,
0.
Am*
ount.
(6)
/?/.7.rWj
Issue----,.
Issue..
Is sue
EXP�tiDED
-Completed
(Memo)
Notes
and
",ommen
te
�'P"fiRirz
Main- Seattle
Muftet
0
f7o
as,
+ell
Adl
--ExDended—
i
r,/
Final'*
421'
E xpenditure
&
j-r 7.9
WS-2
No. End & Central Area (1)
4
000,
dw
-es
R:r
4.31;s-B
4131,3?6`1116
1136,3'Yi',#�
f 14(3 10
WS-3
184th,84th & Vic. (Ph 11)
Ave Constr.
.300001
-10-
.TZ
�.z i.4 V
4-6
9.,2 6 6,1
r(. ?.q 9
4
AV
-g
1, 4 V
LW
"dS 5
9th w/UAB
th . Ma�a to 196, r-e lac.
YOOOO
00 0
IF Y
'?3
Iky
99.76
2.(, &.13
I ;
7 el .?;Z �7 7
W
1W S-
Westgate Separ.(Feeder Mns
6
!WS-7�
Water Tank Expansion Sites
St
7r'q q3
;46
zo
coo
:-,o
3 1.25,11
16
-.73
i
/9: 14,57
-
'i,*IZ91
o�WS-10*76th
Maple Tnk Rpr & install
76th & 244th (St Hwy) repl.
W.'w/ UAB Constr&
a00
CO?
-0-
C'
('54
'92,
15'
6
60. 13
-4/7,
zo
o 6
$z
1�5
1 6 7..
-6
70
Y'lig F ?7
).5�4 -7 C.:L2.)
uj
::"WS
I ' 1
�'S 1
Bowdoin Way � Walnut w/UAq
2 84th.Ave W repl. w/U.AB
Pressure Reduc Ste, Downtwz
7
7
CC)
0
4-
0-
44
73 4 �So
6(.
7:34 go
aq'791
71i�
S101
A
lot—
ys-14,
1 .
�,WS -15
Misc. Water Expenditures
Alder St mains W/LID 1 72
I
i
--�: -.
-0
1
-lq
FT
L
j-
< 'd
q qq�
LU
�U
INIT
It SS-11
TOTAL WATER
RY SEVERS:
Lift.Sta Telemetering Sys,
66 64 o '7 1
a !C;z
5-0
"Is
0,7,2
8 g
o 4 2.
5o
;L<
9.,,o
I?
/407�
-9 Y
4 r
0
LIDA38, City Participatio
/9-
0:-
�1 j
/8
t'
r
'2
FZJM
20i'SS7 1!
2lzthE-QL26th-yL—LIDJ -5(
&
77-
4,69.16
�4
65
41161
12/
1/4.7—
CO
SS-4
212th,.E of 72nd w/UAB
it. �
1 ;
91�1
/0
.
. ! :
' . .
<
'.'SS-51
rL It, SS-6
3rd and Pine
I Misc. San.Sewer dit.
Expen
J
0
0
;Z1
7
t
4;
24
TOTAL SAXITARY SEWE
;Z4
(.'q T
9
-31
10
lo;q,
2
t. 71
19 -7
T
:1920=-�reatment
2.3,
'T PLANT:
i" Plant Expansion
all phases & Outfall Ext.
'j
2 VA.
j 04.
V.
1��
q;iol
1
26
; i
.
. I
Jbo
7400
0
Ife,
4,
. Z31
ji!:SD-1
TOTAL T.P. & OUTFALL
Storm -Sewer Separ.Wowntowr)76006,
?1../ 13 1 S'
2ez?
1 13 3:4001
J!4-L,11
11
4
61111
72�.
M.
1.2 -131
. I
1'.
�1' 5�
-10
".87:
p
165- 16 k iF ;J
75 11, 3
I
q
12 SD-2
Talbot Park Storm Sewers
228th St. & FNT Co. R/I
I
3�1
1'3
740
iz
.3�1 1399
1�
.7 Vo
.31
13
. 1
1 T
11
91
t4
�
3s"
las-
q0
(.740 S;
1, SD-4
5 Corners Drainage A ea
r
.21305,90
0 5z 0:1
JOSD-5�1
D-6
Lk BaIU-nge Dra�nage Area
76th & 244th (St Hwy pr oj)
�/00
R
9,0440
Is
0
< 2-il
L
D-7
College.Joint Storm Sewer-
T,
;-4-
73 9 io
14
7. .3
!3
.0.
? 3.7.5
I D-8
SD-9
Meadowdale Drainage Area
Misc Minor Drainage Exp*nd
e
�0
:-w
0�'
0-
i�3
19
t
�'9?1
SD-1
h,,7.�h. & LID 172 1
if,
.5t _Maple w/
F-711-
LR
6 1-7
3
40
f 9 4
Lf
f-73
44
__
—112
_j;_
8,417
2iq
7.re/,31.72-
1020
rig,
i
'-z 0 �S-A
12
5rq 3 3q�
1701
I I.
TOTAL STORM SSWERS
1.6
q I
t
]�Lilf ! C
C. or uilding
T�JYJLDJING�. S'
(00
0
Id
0057�qli
L
- ---- -
J9
L.. A
9 1 10 -1.
1
o:r-7
z
I
6PM1N.oCCSTS
Je4 the -
r-P-Qi
j483
�7!
?.4.3 7 0
0
'ET F,
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FIELD CHECK LIST
Applicant Field Check By, Dates -3-73
14 V ILS I FJ . (a "14 6' STREETS AND ACCESS
1. Right -of -Way:
& evils-t VIVO* NO ArVV1T16&J*L ACQUiRWO
2. Street Type and Condition:
GILAVEL 0, , 2,04
Z-1,41or AsAht-1 0?J 7.16TIJ (SUNNIX MAIAlf. 1911Z)
3. Access jasements:
tfA
UTILITIES
1. Water Mains: (00 (z Itj 7-I&TIO
2. Sanitary Sewer Location: 3. Depth: 11in 3.51.
19 TV,
14. Assessment: 11:'f v4"
Lit) III
5. Storm Sewer:
6. Utility Easements:
7. Septic Drainfield Area:
-06
TOPOGRAPHY
See lard folf
IWO 901 C a,
LOT ARRANGE14ENT
COL -
GENERAL COMMENTS
-%tEET FILE
AMENI_LIES DESIGN BOARD
February 27, 1974
The regL,ar meeting of the Amenities Design Board was called to order by Vice -
Chairman John Latourell in the absence of Chairman tiargaret Bernhoft. I lembe rs
present were Mike Rizzuto, Keith Goldsi,dth and Don Westlin. Staff members pre-
sent were Joe Wallis, City Planner, Harry Whitcutt, Buildinq Official, John
Wallace, City Attorney and Petie Hendrck, Secretary.
Chiirmari Latourell welcomed the people in the audience. He explained the pro-
ceoures of the Amenities Design Board.,aod asked the audience to participate in
matters that were of interest to them.
Mr. Wallis announced that two nembers (1 the Ad Hoc Design Committee were in
attendance for the first.regular meetitg, Paul Cook and J. Ward Phillips.
ADB�-1-74 L. L. Beig�. Residential Condominium. 17 units. Between 5th and
6th on the south side of Alder St. (R!IH)
Mr. Wallis re-iewed the application and showed slides of the site. Keith
Goldsmith stel�ped down from the Board �.s Mr. Beigh had been his client.
Mr. Beigh was in the audience. He pre,r!nted his plans for review by the Board.
The plans had been redone following coiferences with the Building and'Planning
Department in order to reduce the heigi,t by 9 feet. The building is now 3 fee�
under the maximum height. 11r. Beigh we.,, asked about the development of Alder
Street and he said it was his understandinq that he would have to develop the
street to its full.width.
John Latourell said one of his concern-, was that a building as prominent as this
in this location could be seen for many miles and lie asked that the builder con-
sider a different color other than white. A darker color would soften the im-
pact on the City. Mr. Westlin asked what the natural color of the brick was
and was told either grey or beige. Mr. Wpstlin said a stark white has an insti-''
tutional look.
Pir ' Beigh shuwad a preliminary landscaping plan. The Board asked that Mr. Be i gh
return with a more detailed landscaping plan and a lighting plan for the exterior
of the building.
Several,people in:the,audience spoke4about,the power the -Board was weillding in
requi-iing,that a developer chanqe�color to their,liking. Paul Cooki a member
of the,Ad Hoc Design.,Committee asked,that,the Board keep in mind the'charges
i,ssued,, to them by the "Ad Hoc Committee.' ;He said he felt that color was a matter
of the, -man puttlnfup�th@ money to build'.,'� To get too technical could cause,de-
lays and they,"are very costly,to,.the builder.
'like Rizzuto suggested that the Board approve the plan of 1r. Beigh subject to
the submission of landscaping and lighting plans. Mr. Beigh said he had not had
much time 'to get a landscapinq plan prior to this hearing.
4r. Rizzuto saiChe 4elt that_the Board should not dictate' color, but should as k
for syb.mission, of several intended colors as,ftStt"ould not -like ia purple� building.
A MOTION�WAS MADE BY MR. WESTLIN, SECONDED BY MR. RIZZ!JT() TO ACCr.PT THE PLA4 OF C.
AND SUB01ITTING LIGHTING AND LANDSCAP-
L. L. BEIGH, ABD-1-74, SUBJECT TO CLARIFYING
C,tr
NG PLANS AND INDICATION OF GROWTH HEIGHT OF PLANTINGS AND A COLOR COLLAGE FOR
AINTING THE BUILDING.._'Motion carried unanimously.
D-244 Danmor Co. Aldercrest Convalescent Center. Northwest corner 216th
St. S.W.-and 72nd Ave. West. (RMH)
_0B 3-74 Danmor Co. Aldercrest Petirement Apartments. Northwest corner' 216th
St. S.W. and 72nd Ave. West. (RMH)
Amenities Design Board - Regular *leetinq - February 27. 1974 -- Page 2
t4r. Wallis said because these twi applications really are for the saw coriple)(
the Board should hear them at tht same tire. He showed slides of the site.
Mr. McClarty Of Higgins. 4cClarty and Brand, P.S. Engineers, representing Dan-
mor Construction showed thp plans for the Retirement . apartments and the Conva-
lescent Center. Mr. McClarty said the convalescent center was to be stucco,
either white or tan. The apartments would be horizontal wood sidinq stained
some shade of brown. It was to ba conservative in appearance. The existing
trees on the site are to be preserved and building design has been around the
trees. There are off -site prol)lerns to be screened off so they are planning
to use maple and types of pine trees which will be 6 to 10 feet when planted.
Lighting will be for safety and security with very little outside lighting.
The outside lighting is the tyoe that is required by the Enqineering Department.
Mini -bus service will be provi led to take residents shopping, etc. Because of
th� age group in the apartments there will be virtually no cars.
Mr. Wallis noted that this corrolex will be one-half block from Highway 99 which
will undoubtedly be a future bus route in the city.
The Board $aid lights for strent lighting for thli complex ebould wt be mercury
vapor according to City standards. but of a different type, not In bright. Mr.
Go)Jsmith said he thought 72nd to 212th should be completely improved, with
paving and sidewalks.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MR. WESTLIN, SECONDED BY tiR. GOLDSMITH TO ACCEPT THE DESU;N
APPLICATION OF DANHOP CONSTRUCTION FOR ADB-2-74 A�ID ADB-3-74 AND CALL TO T14E
ATTENTION OF THE CITY THAT FURTHER STUDY BE MADE ON STREET LIGHTS FOR DEVELOP-
MENTS OF THIS TYPE AND TO ENCOI.JRAriE THE CITY TO PROVIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND
SIDEWALKS IN THE AREA. Motion carried unanimously. I
fir. Goldsmith said he would li�.e to compliment the architects on their landscape
plan. He said he felt they ha I sitown a good mix of plant life.
Mr. Wallis said he would also !iko to compliment tho architects on one of the
finest sets of plans that has om,- into hi,-� office. 11r. Latourell said he too
would like to thank them is it ma4e the work of the Board much easier.
ABO-4-74 Tire Marketers. InstAllsition of pole sign. 7711 Lakp Ballinger Way
.— N.E. (BC)
i /* Mr. Wallis showed pictures of �he site and explained the application.
The applicant was not in atten,lan,e. The 13oard asked Mr. Wallis if he ha,l a land-
scape plan and he said the orfiin-il drawin,is for the building showed land,,caping.
He said the Building and Planning Department had approved a site plan. no. a
landscape plan.
IT WAS MOVED BY MR. RIZZUTO, S1 COt,OED BY M:�. GOLDS41TH TO CMTINUC THE HEARING ON
ABD-4-74 AND REQUIRE MORE INFOfIMATION FROM THE APPLICANT. 4otion carried unanimously.
ADB-5-74 Sam Ewing. InstallalJon of sign, 525 Main St. (BC)
fir. Wallis showed slides of th( building and reviewed the application. Tf e
applicant was in the audience cnd said they were moving the sign from the4r pre-
vious location to the new buil((ing. The sign is 6 feet by 4 feet and mo�nted on
the surface of the building. "here is back, lighting for 0e sign.
A NOTION WAS MADE BY 11R. RIZZUTO, SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN THAT ADB-6-74 BF APPROVEr)
AS APPLIED FOR. Motion carried unanimously.
INT- '-OFFICE CC1rMM-U_JCAV
STRIEET i RLE DATE November 7, iq 73
'/TO Harn), Whitcutt
. Building Official
�OPM 41 - LITTLE'S
FROM Richard H. Allen
Assistant City Engineer
41SUBJECT: Aldercrest Convalescent Center
Attached are the requirements for the site and utility improvements.
The site plan has not been prepared to date. It is further
requested that no permit be issued for building construction until'-"_�`_
the plan has been reviewed. By issuing the foundation permit without
a site plan, the Frades may present problems when the final site plan
is approved.
HHA: mj r
Attachment
0
May 25, 1973
Danmor Construction, Inc.
400 - 108th Avenue H.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Attention: Mr. Ronald E. Coulter
SUBJECT: Aldercrest Nursing Home -and Convalescent
Center
Dear Mr. Coulter:
Returned herewith is your plan of the subject site.
Indicated on the plan in red ink Is the location of fire hy-
drants as specified by1he rire Department.
The Public Works department has reviewed the sewer
trunk fee for the subject development and finds it would be
a total of $1,285. If you need any further information, please
don't hesitate to contact us.
Yours very truly,
CITY or EDMONDS
RICHARD H. ALLEN
Assistant City Engineer
RHA: mj r
Attachment
0
SW,71'11017T F]iLIADIZ.
Memo to: Leif Larson
City Engineer
From: J. Herb Gilbo
Director of M & 0 Public Wks.
Subject: Side Sewer Permit and Trunk Charges
for Aldercrest Convalescent and
Retirement Center
LI
May 24, 1973
RECEIVEff,
MAY 3 0 1973
Ed"'lor-ds D eet.
The following is a computation of the side sewer permit fee
for the Aldercrest Convalescent and Retirement Center, based upon our
current City Code :
50 Unit Retirement Center (based upon $25.00 trunk charge
per unit, the same as for multi-
ple dwellings): $1,250.00
160 Bed Convalescent Center (no provision for hospitals
or other agencies who would
use a "per -bed" computation): 25.00
Side Sewer Permit Fee: 10.00
TOTAL: $1,285.00
JHG: sm
01
EET FLF.
-3-
CAO REPORT
EDINONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APFITJ, 17, 1273--
CAO Ron,Whaley reported that the City last Thursda, received $270,281.25,
less $4,000 on the Neighborhood Flcility HIUD Grant. This was a net of
$266,281.25 as first payment from 'IUD for its acquisition ' of the property.
Ile reminded Council that the original agreement st,ated a purchase price of
$360,000 and the City will be required to match the $266,281.25 with
V/ $93,718-75. The transaction is in escrow. The contract gives June 6th
as completion date for closing. Ile stated that these funds are now avail-
able,.and that it would be po-s.sible,for the City to gain $2,000 by June lst
by investing the,-;e funds on a short term basis. Mr. Vnaley stated that the
Senior Citizens have not been paying any rent to the owners of the property
since the first of the year. 1"hey had commented to the Nelson Brothers that
they would have to look to the City for the rent charge. A provision for
rent payment was not in the contract, nor even discussed or brought up at
any time,� according to Mr. Whaley's recollection. Ar. Whaley asked the
Council if they would recommend clsoing now, or wait until June lst-and make
some interest from invcL;tint,, the funds. Councilman Gellert inquired how
it would be possible to gain �2,000 in just a month and one-half? Mr. Whaley
explained that this was po!�sible by inve�5ting the total amount ($266,000).
Councilman Nel-son.,'asked if.we place the Senior Citizens in any kind of
jeopardy by not paying the rent? Mr. Wallace said no, and also that there iS,
no'obligatiob on -the part,of -the City to pay the rent. A motion was made
�econded by Councilman Winters that we close as
by Councilman Gellert and — ssion, the motion carried.
quickly as possible. After a brief discu
D
I]EP ING: PLANNING COMMIS-SION RES. 0104 - RECOI,�,,NDING APPROVAL OF A PROPOSE
AMENDME,,NT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONI-NG MAP TO PEZONE FROM CG TO BC
'SCRIBED . IT,,! PLANNING COMMIS'10H R-1-73.
- RTY DE
PRO 11"
City Planner Joe Wallis reported that the area concerned is 4.6 acres of land.
a
L// Mr. Wallis projected maps on the screen depicting the zoning in the are and
location of Stc.vens Hospital. lie indicated that the applicant plans a nursing
home and retirement home for this land. He stated further that the hospital
ha,,3 influencod die� dQvelopment pattern in this vicillitY. Mr. Wallis pointed
o.ut that a CO Zone does not pc.rmit a residential use, but the BC Zone does.
However, the BC Zone does not provide for setbacks. The applicant has indic
ated that he will enter into a contract to provide the setbacks. Mr. Wallis
stated that'he felt this wz�s a compatible land use in this area. Since we
do.not have a zone that would lend itself to this type of development, the
BC Zone with all agreed setback seems to be the most expedient way to accommodate
this particular land vse� according to Nir. Wallis. lie said the auto wrecking
yard across the street would require som.e screening. lie said he had slides
of this.proposed'development and would like the Council to view them. Mayor
Protem Shippen asked why they hadn't asked for mi�ltiple (RML) zoning which
The hearing was
would allow for.condiii.onal ube with required setbacks.
then opened.
Mr. William 'Wilson, attorney for applicants (Ducy and Sievers) explained that,
they had been here before requesting reclassification to RML. At that point
It was necessary for
they discovered the conditional use permit requirement.
them to.secure all required underlying zoning in order to perform according
to the option, and..that this could not be done leaving open the conditional
use per . mit,that would have a limited term on it.. For that reason they looked
-.for a zone that would more closely meet their requiremei.ts and came up with
the BC Zone. Couficilman Nordquist asked if they were requesting a contract,
t th I the cri.ix of it. Y111YOr PrOtcm
i Mr. Wil:�;o,n ropliod tha
-,c conditions of the contract were not
Shippdn asked w',lat would hoppen if tj
met. \,City Attorney Wallace explained that if -the terms of the contract werO
not met,, then the zoning'would- revert back. There was considerable discussion
�regarding the zoning,: during which Mayor Protem Shippen asked if this would
zoning'is downtown. Mr.
be a spot rezone as she understood most of tile BC
�3 Mr. Wilson stated
Wallace answered that it wa, fraught with that potential.
I
- f -
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 17, - 1973
-4-
he had considered this, because he did not want to seek action that would be
overturned. He thoua-ht that the uses contemplated are cor.-Datible with the
surrounding zones. Councilman Tuson made a motion seconded by Councilman
Nelson that property described in P.C. File R-1-73 be rezoned from CG to BC.
Councilman Gellert then asked., if -,the-.Council could view the slides showing
what is planned by the applicants. Councilman Gellert remarked that the
whole zoning law was inadequate and did not seem to cover a facility such
as this. Nursing homes are not reflected in our parking requirements. He
stated that somewhere wo should have a section on nursing homest retirement
homes, etc. City Planner Wallis explained that parking requirements are not
based on zone, but for a specific use. Following considerable discussion,
the motion was voted upon. TbQre was a roll call vote, which resulted in a
Hat the motion thus failed, since four affirmative
tie. City Attorney Wallace/st-ha
votes were needed for the motion to pass. A motion was then made by Council
man Gellert and seconded by Councilman Winters that we study the problem of
zoning around a medical facility such as Stevens Hospital, and come up with
guidelines, plans and zoning that adequately reflects the needs of. cities
and citizens in the surrounding community. There was more discussion, after
and that
which Mr. William Wilson explained that he represented the optionor
he was formally withdrawing his application for rezone. He stated that his
reason for this is that they are now in a General Commercial Zone, and with
or without the optionee, they can live with that. He said they had geared
themselves to making this move with the optionce and had been very optimistic,
but it'is'ju I st not there. . Mayor Protem Shippen asked if a motion could be
made for a change to an RML Zone, however City Attorney Wallace' said this
would have to be posted and referred back to the Planning Commission. After'
some -more discussionj the motion was voted upon and passed.
REPORT ON SPACE NEEDS-,, CONSULTANT (PLANNING DEPARTMENr)
City Planner, �oe Wallis made a report on space needs as directed by City
Council on February 20th. He said he had discussed this with CAO Ron Whaley,
reviewed a reported prepared by Bill Nims in May, 1.972 and had preliminary
diccussion with two architectural firms concerning utilizing profensional
help on a limited basis. Based upon information presently available he
recommends a study of the short term and long term space needs for the city
be conducted in parallel. He outlined this study in a report which had
This study would
been passed out to each member of the Council and Staff. ecommendations.
be accompl-ished in three phases: Inventory, Analysis and finally, R
resently
The inventory phase would take into consideration the usable space p
owned by the City, personnel space needs, equipment space needs, historical
patte I rns of employment, etc. The -analysis would take into consideration the
long range requirements based upon projected population and potential annex
ation areas to the south between Edmonds and the County line. Short range
requirements would'.take into consideration better utilization of present space?
projected personnel and equipment space needs,. interdepartmental relationships, etc.
Finally, would, come., the recommendations which would include developing evaluation
criteria, alte4rnate space need solutions, cost, etc. The Planning Staff then
offered the following,recommendations: that the Council elect to proceed with
study as proposed or revise the program and proceed. Assuming either of these
esponsible for this study;
circumstances, that a committee be established r
that -the committee report to the Council not later than 30 days after appointed;
that progress reports be received when requested, at the end of each phase
and'when,a decision is needed for the study. Finally, it was suggested that
outside help be held to a minimum, but that some professional help, if needed,
ants it.
be authorized by separate action when a specific task warr
Mayor Protem Shippen asked how long it would take to do the long and the short
range studies and Mr. Wallis answered that this would take approximately three
months. Councilman Gellert urged that aesthics be c nsidered when doing thi
study, and wondered if professional help might be advisable in this regard.
Mr. Whaley thought the right approach would be through committee. He said
'we have professional people on our Staff. lie thought the�se persons should be
GENERA TELEPHONP
COMPANY of the NORTHWEST Inc
Post Office Box 68 Lynnwood, Washin�ton 93036
Mr. Leif Larson
City Engineer
250 5th Ave. N
Edmonds, Washington 98020
PERMI T APPL I CAT I ON FOR WORK ORDER 210-387274
The General 'relephone Company of the Northwest, Inc., hereby applies
for permission to:
Install and maintain a direct buried communications cable and associated
fixtures for a distance'of 201 on 212th St. SW and open cut 72nd Ave. W.
to place 1-2" PVC and thence south. o.n.west side of 72nd Ave.,W. as
illustrated on attached drawing.
Work is schedUled to start approximately
Constructi.on wil.] require approximate.ly
October 28, 1974
5 - days
Please refer all questions regarding this permit to:
774-3ZO2
n this area.
If this work meets with your approval, please sign and return the original
to: General Telephone Ccmpany of the Northwest, Inc., P.O. Box 63
Lynnwood, Washington 98036.
a
T i t I e: W. C � Br i'l 1,_�ngi nee r I n2 and
Construction SuperV-1s_&F
The Ceneral Telophone Company is hereby authorized to perform thc work listed
above in accordance. with their franchise and Subject to all appiicable State,
courity ani/or rilUnicipal ord*,nances ano ,peciFications. Subject to inspection
and -restoration. All work to be in accordance with Ord. "9' r notice
is required for inspections. Call M-2525,
ext. 252.
9/27/74 -- ----- __FJW Inv. Pem i No. 74-156
Fee $ 20.00 Upon. Issuance of this permit, the contractor is
responsible fo,- wo,lu-nar,�!lip a,,:d materials for
a period of one year fol!
Owing inspection of
the restorai;nn by the En�, , is
CITY OF
DMONDS
ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
InspDate ............... -By .................
...... Remarks ...
........ 4 ..........................
InspDate -----------
----- BY ........................
Remarks. .
............................................ . .................... 6
Insp Date_ .............
By ..........
-sJ
............ .
................. ........................ ..............................
InspDa -be .................
By
......................... 0, a
--------- ................
.............. 1-1.1 ..........
By
........................ Remarl.-s]
............. : .................................................. ............
-4
n] 17ILt
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
505 BELL STREET
EDIVIONDS,- WASHINGTON 98020
APPLICATION FOR INVASION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
(Submit In Dufilicate)
Permit to be issued
For work at: (address or vicinity) 7-
Owner:
Name
Mailing Address
city State Telephone Numbe
/7
Contractorn,
Name
7
Mailing Address
city State Telephone Number
Signature:,-7���4 Z�lj . I ,
,9�"er or Agent Date Signed
DO NOT WRITE BELOW' THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
Permit Issued (date
Remarks:
A / &4�7
-Z /7
Permit Number ::� 4/ —/-5— <)
Upon issuance of fhiJ permit, the contractor is responsible Work subject to inspection and restoration in accordence
for workmanship and materials for a period of one year with city code. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection.
following inspection of the restoration by the Engineering Call 775-2525
Dept.
CITY OF ED"ONDS
I, :
EITGTfTLEPiI'.':G D�PART",NT
InspDate ----------------- By- ....... .............. Remarks ....... --------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------
InspDate ........... .. . P,; .................... P,? r.; a r �- s ................. .....................................................................
Is.p Date ................ By ........ [.,!-s ------ ........ ..................... .....................................
Insp D t B'o
a- - - ----- ...... Reli . . ......... ............................. ................................... .............
4TZT-sjl4-. A- �� ALL .... WMC-POZ ---- MCGO,
Fina By ---- 6-1� ......
FORM r0401#3 t�EV
@-I
VA
cs 0 11
+1'-"- 6 ' - - -
ril
I
0
�-ll
N
N
7Z 1VD R VE. W,
S/W
4
Lj
CR 61 E t--1 0 D 1. 2:3'
2- 7/4 - 2 5
R1w
RIW
17S"
481,
85'
KA7'r6tA 11P
S7X�'EET*7'l//-'/C/L. 212THST.SW
SCRLE ;--fVnt',-lE
LWIVN& 72,-.VD 111%
I - YMS14IN&TbAl NP TURR L 6,FiS 01:�, PR5 ME EN MT/FIED
LO F I NT EN7 6 F 6 TE I . CO. T6 C rZOSS 6 R S CO. IJ AlE 5
PND 1-4PS PPFR0'V',SD VV!rll MRXIMU.M f-/-7R"= USED
'DVP-JNG TreFENCHWG.
"1 4/
,--REaUlRED 7Rr-`NCkJ
re) 2-1(.04 S7-,'5W W(I-L 13G Jl)ll*ltr VVIr14 SN0,(-0,F-UV 'r/.
3-THE-l0'Dt:57-1,74,"(:L- 6FGEN, r&L. CROS�;W66r"72ND PNE.W.
MAY HRVETZ) BE )�DJUSri!�D 70 40'± DEPrz-10ING (7N
,R,CTUPL LOCRTIDN 0 P GRS CO, UNF-'S,
a
P/L
TITLE q, DE ZQ%E'-57- ENT
O"T" ICT 1EXCHANGE
I-
L E 6r L:--- WD --5U,6*'.'��URFnCE FRC-11.)MaS TO
R6urE 6F FR6POSED RLDE;�umx (-*61NV, RNZ) R57-M.LLMC-Ai�-
n 174# 011'r in r7 --7 > A i ri f"i z %
Ll i'y
0 FPbFOI�iEZ) BURIED Cl7k541-t-, t4lVD LOCRT16. 1M.
CP SOLgY OWAIED &EN.Trzt-, RISER Po�,E
5
—f2j FROPt6ED SPLICir CRSr--S FOR FU-FUJFI-=
SE-RVICE ENTRONCE To V17CRNT LI-71VD.
SPL ICE C17-SESTO M- E LOLRT, D OVE Q
TRENCH cl—
I
t4
ROSS AOUS 14EMOVAL mAiNTENANCE I RETlovims I —5AL—VAO—t
CONSTRUCTION SECTION
LABOR HOURS
c
x m
CREW
SPLICE
OTHER
SCHEO.START
ACTUAL START by
DATE
SCHED, CONIA
ACTUAL COMP. BY
DATE
JOINT POLE SECTION
JPN NUMSE14 DATE
APPLICATION NOL DATE
RECORDS 6 DRAFTING
POSTED by DATE
APPROVALS DATE
p" , /!"") — ,, A c7 —
ct6
V
R 9 2 -1 9,1 0
W
4
N
'i
-fN
P0 L E__
Z�, I i
S I -Araf-L,
I NJt�5-F/-\ L L_ PCIIF'�-4L,6,,�--,:5 Cq 1.4-7- 1-,� C--,-
/Ni-a 111.4
- 7=1
C4 -
7_0
(Z)v.
-7z,,
CA-
C-: L_� Y-U �ZZ_
F1 2- E_ C. T U C, H -I
�4 0 L /,,C EIF N-1- T -T'-C)
OV
L
tc), -
d
Labor Accopnts
Install
Transfer
Rernova�
U.G. EQ. & MAT.
COND. GRDS. & ROOS
SERVICES
TRANS,& CUT-OUTS
0
J
C
6
Z
w
cc, 9
I N e�j 7'-" `L_ L_ 4- e, 4� e", 4" ��\J t -I*"'-. �.4,
�2
'a
v
Lu
_j
j
it
-Al 4.
r,
(1)
6
CO
w w
0
<
a.
rL 4 -
;-,j
0
\LL 4' -4 4.'
J
�4
<
z
w
w
z
f-L4 (.e-,0 0 Y-- I/C, At C_0�13<_11_ t\_VL_ u
cc
Q
G-
-L4-
i x_7_�
Kj -
7
(_,!)1Dc-) x
APPE-10VED
Py
DATE ... ..............
a-
L;
=
STOCK ISSUE
CREDIT
DATE i9 DELIVER TO SUPPLIES
S Proo.: Quantity S
Acct. Co Prop. Quantity
Code Unit, Iss. Ord: Material de Acct. Unit Iss, Ord. Material
220
GROUND ROD 5/8X6'
77
743
No. 2 PRL SPLICE
88
070
G ROUND ROD CLMPS,
'49
446
L.13,C.O,, I t� C-,,, 4�: V,
77
761
1/0 SPLICE
87
730,
C�O. BKT.'
34
FUSE ��-Z06A Soj,�?T,�
77
601
SEC. PEDESTAL
25
762
NYLON INSULINER
.78
585
88 SL SEC, CONN, BAR
88
-776
J-HOOK
78
678
33 SL SEC, CONN, BAR
92
'i!�i
KELLUM GRIP- 150C�, M Cj,�j
78
579
44 SL SEC. CONN. BAR
78
581
55 SL SEC_CONN, BAR
76
112
STAND'OFF BKT,
612
LUGS 2/0 AL, COMP,
76
132
A
PIPE CLMPS. 2"
78
614
LUGS 4/6 AL. COMP.
76
_134�_
PIPE CLMPS. 3"
78
616
LUGS 350 AL. C6MP.
-7.6
136
L
PIPE CLMPS. 4"
78
626
LUGS 600 AL. COMP,
78
522
PLUGS33SLEEVE
LAGSCREWS
78
523
PLUGS 77 SLEEVE
78
524
PLUGS LP SLEEVE
0301
r
2" RIGID CONDUIT,.
78
506
COVER L6 SLEEVE
�032
3" RIGID CONDUIT
78
507
COVER L7 SLEEVE
\ZPO,va
N"
1
-7 C:,'
4
78
508
'COVER L8 SLEEVE
ON�
SGC
1" PLAST16 DUCT
78
562
'LO D.E. COVER
25
005
2" PLASTIC DUCT
2-
L-UC—, Vt- Q_ N- L
25
007
6!3 C)
3" PLASTIC DUCT`
S��4
25-
009
4". PLAST IC DUCT
25
GRND.4W9,H-
STEEL 90OX
76
200
VAULTTRANS. 2X2
25
PLASTIC 90OX
25
STEEL TO PLST. ADAPT.
xc.
4.
38
523
WARNING STICKERS
76
230
STAND OFF INS.
77
705
POTHEAD No. 2
77
709
POTHEAD 1/0
76
POTHEAD BKT.'
48
257
LIGHTNING ASSTR.
R4
Sc�j
77
722
STRESS CONE No. 2
83
211
11
1
WIRE No. 2 AL, PSI.
77
723
STRESS CONE 1/0
84
512
WIRE No, 2 CU, PRI,
83
212
0.1',SC
"WIRE 1/0 AL. PRI,
76
.4 TERM J-BOX
76
238
2 WAY J-BOX
83
389
WIRE 4�O AL. SEC.
83
386
WIRE 360 AL, SEC.
83
220
WIRE 500 AL', SEC.
78
532
No. 2 ELBOW
78
535
1-7
1/0 ELBOW
83
306
8 AL. DUPLEX
22
159
t '7_
6 AMP, ST, LT. FUSE
31
240
4
No, '159 S.E. SLEEVES
77
606
600 AMP PLUG CONN.
il
260
ST. LT. FUSE HOLDER
77
610
600 AMP PLUG D.E.
71
130
O.S. STEEL ST. LT. STD�
76
125
r2-t
. No. 2 D.E, CAP
70
�AcQ
G � L U M I H E.
REIMBURSIBLE
MATERIAL NO.
T R A NS F.
FILLED MATERIAL RECEIVED MATERIAL CODE CHECKED
12-7-73 981-1
ivorK AUtnorizeci tsy Liate e_`i - L I I Z-1-
URDCOND _,KV JOINT—�
ADD —7 C> c� CKT FT PH, WAT E R — �S
REM CKT FT PH SEWER —
NET —7 1::> L_j__ CKT FT GAS—
City of Edmonds BLD20110474
121 5'" AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX(425) 771-0221
Website: www,ci,edmonds,wa.us
PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT
* Planning - Building - Engineering
Engineering Plan Review Comments
Permit Application #: BLD20110474 Date: July 12, 2011
Project Name/Address: Aldercrest Health & Rehab
Contact Person/Address, Fax or E-mail: John Hunt— 'ohnhuntnahunteng—coin
Reviewer: JENNIFER LAMBERT Division: ENGINEERING
During review of the subject submittal, it was found that the following information, corrections, or
clarifications would need to be addressed. All Handouts referred to in these comments can be accessed at
our website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us under City Government / Development Services Department
Engineering Division then scroll down to Handouts:
1) Please add the impervious surface chart (provided in the E72 Handout), as shown below, to the Site
Plan.
Line
Type
Area (square feet)
Non -Regulated
82248
Exempt
Regulated
Replaced
2.
5.
3.
New (Post 1977) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Total Regulated Impervious )�rea'
Mitigation required if in excess of Omf
+
'AQ
Oki ie
d4.
5.
6.
Total Area Mitigated by Existing Stormwater Management System(s)
Regulated Area Not Yet Mitigated
0
0
7.
Area Proposed to be Mitigated by Low Impact Development Techniques
0
Area Proposed to be Mitigated through Conventional SWM Techniques
0
2) Please show on the Site Plan the year of construction for all impervious surfaces.
1HUNT ENG. Response: Impervious Surfaces are shown on the 1974 Architecural plan shown on sheet SITE-1
3) Although the new structure is to be placed on existing impervious surfaces, the new structure will be
considered new impervious surface. Please revise the impervious surface calculations accordingly.
1HUNT ENG. Response: Calculations Revised. I
4)
1HUNT ENG, Response: Infrastructure of this nature is shown on the 1974 Civil Plan shown on
5) glease show the water seuice line from The buildiWW the water meter.
DATE
[HUNT ENG. Response: Water Service Line is shown on sheet SITE-2. I
IN 19 ?n11 DAd-V I
n-rRE a —own FILEWILDING D�PARFMENT
0 � k: I CITY OF LMMONDS
City of Edmonds BLD20110474
121 5" AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX(425) 771-0221
Website: www,ci,edniondsma,us
PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
Engineering Plan Review Comments
6) Please show the side sewer from the main to the building.
JHUNT ENG. Response: Infrastructure of this nature is shown on the 1974 Civil Plan shown on shee7tSITE-2
a. Please include the grease interceptor (see attached).
JHUNT ENG. Response: Infrastructure of this nature is shown on the 1974 Civil Plan shown on sheet SITE-2
* *Items 3, 4, 5 are to verify that the new structure is not built over the utilities.
Please resubmit 3 copies of the revised site plans and associated documents with a written response to
each item to a Permit Coordinator. Please contact me at 425-771-0220 ext 1321 or by e-mail at
q ennifer.lambert(a-)ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have specific questions regarding these plan corrections.
DATE E-MAILED. 7/13/2011 PAGE(l)
APPLICATION
The City of Edmonds for
SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT NO - ---------------------------------------------
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS R LID NO. ....... . ASMT. NO.
CONTRACTOR ------- MIT NO. -----------
---------------------------------- -
JOB ADDRESS ......... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------
...................................................................................................... -----------------------------------------------------------
ncl:�A-NaRs F=I\JE—= - r F�l L! �. e_- - r! s: �
NAMEOF ADDITION .. ............................................................................................... ................
��5 --- " --=,-j -- .
1:1 TO
kA.
E--- V-� u �=— \4N4
Approved:
DATE By ......
................... .
.............
�vahlcle tun**
nedlus
new boltud. typ
to detall
04Y SO
i
approximate outline of
free follage abovtIt
0
free, Yeft In field
�x"`
z
. It, I
X/
exist. curb to be
removed
/.'PR0P0SE0:SHELTER"—,-
new e' con. curb
new 4'-Ow wide cone. narnp,
1:20 slope max. field "dfy
I?
slope of exist walk
exist. oonc. curb
41 _1
SHELTER PLAN 2 5 10
conc. dome
50 0 std. steel bumper
post completely filled with
concrete smooth mound
top paint traffic yellow
saw cut and ramme
Portion of exist, asphalt
paMng lot
conc. footing
turbod soil
PL��D DETAIL
1 2 5
V-W
iI Iplicant shall repair/replace all damage to
lities or frontage improvements in City I
ht-of-way per City standards that is caused
r occurs, during the permitted project.
match exist. grade
(V.I.f.)
now conc. surface to
match exist
exist oont;. walk
FOR EROSION
Nothing in this Permit approtm I process shall be
I I.riterpreted as allowing or permitting the
illegal,
cc of any currently ex
�rrmng or' unpermitted building, 11 n P, m Is
'or conditionwhicli is cnitside the scope of the
=mit application, regamicss of whether socb'
g, structure or condition is shown an the
.1 sitel—lah drawing. Such building,
.4 or be the sub ")ct,,0,,r
:,00i on may ject of a scpmft
enforicement action."
new 4'-w wide conc.
ramp 1:20 slope max.
laid -Hfy slope of
.xdst walk
APPROVED BY PLANNING
-717-f L(
A4j�� .
YC��N IRI 11
2 5
3W - V-0*
Existing Facility
Area
41,541 sq. ft.
Type
Type V - 1 HR const.
Licensed Beds
160
Parking Established by previous permit
61 spaces
Proposed
As Built survey parking count (see site plan)
59 spaces
Proposed shelter Will reduce count by 2
.2 spaces
Existing dumpsters reduce available parking
.3spaces
Proposed total
64 spaces
Required Parking
Edmonds City Code, Section 17.50 'Off street
parking regulations" Section 17.50.020 (A)3
(1) space per (3) beds
160 / 3 = 54 spaces required
Required Total
54 spaces
3 PARKING SPACES USED
FOR EXISTING DUMPSTERS
NOTE rHAT 17M
Lit,36 WILL
;��OT cavicc
ktt��OO(A A-afoLAN6 11,9
S TI L� It% L-%1% 3
LJ"C ILL ME60
PMKNG SPACES
ROPOSED SHELTER
TYP REDUCE PARKING BY 2
PSTALLS
P
EXISTING 1 11-�
GENERATOR
R IS RESPONSIBLt
!ROL AND DFWNAC-E LOADING
z
EXIT'
Zone Corner Fla&._�
M4r
ALDEPC-rEl�!T HEA�ITH ArJD PE—�E
H C. STALL IX
---? I
H C. STALL 11
Setbacks
I�Luired
Actual
Front E'
(5
Sides #15
10110
t Och o r
Rear w
11
Other
Heic�ht
1
16
0
do
S
;ETiPL 5 'o
_V PROPOSED SHELTER
(g is
i�
E),
y
as PAIIXING SPACES
I (L4 N C-71 0 1
EXISTING WALKWAY
PROPOSED ACCESS TO NEW
OUTDOOR SHELTER ALONG
EXISTINGWALKWAY
At
sailap4a.
2
Inv
M
A Cn
St.?
Cn
rn C`>
M
Cn
C-2
M
Cn
;M C:)
M
10f
Cn Cf)
M
A C�
C
M
cn
\J\)
\\1
:10
M-
wapf`tcaal
—n
laaaaacass
f"cols'
1\1
1A OUT
Engineering Services Inc.
am M— bass W
Ph —
1001k
wo
Ng
IR(HITECTURE—
USTAINABILITI
z
z
W
z
z
0
Lu
laaala,
sassall
W
U)
W
ul
z
W
LLJ
ar-
C4
sassall
Q
Q
C4
9092 REGISTERED
�
ARCHITECT
MATTHEW G COATES
STATE OF WASHINGTON
HUNT ENO. JOS 0
11-150-010-00
DATE ISSUM.
JULY 19,2011
rOR
IREMSION&
A JULY 19. 2011 crry COMMENTS
A
n
SHMT 00INTENTS:
SITE PLAN
PROPOSED
SHELTER
IESU
JUL 19 2011 SHM NUMBM*
LDING DEPAFt-,WNT
:irt OF EDMONDS A-1 00
IDF
11
.. WE ..... UJAILLS
A.. A. ` PLAN,
4
.,,r ,m ... . .... Au, -
TIES 11.,Wl
A-2 NET RAN. I
A-3 RUN PLAN .1.
YIT"
ENE—T. ILAS,WDT
NKF
A-4 Roo. I-
.5 V-5141 AKEI'U
$8
I
'or —::I -:IA T
'ILI A I . ILAN
A4 I" S ALI ANSI PLANS
.I
;LE1
EXIS, UP I WIN.,
A I ElIVAU"I
llftl ,I,
A ....t.6 SECTIONS
.3
:L..l
P'..N, —oA I —LAN IEI I
LM ILAH IENTLAE —
INEWAIlt. I.— EINTA- AREA
Al. NIA:L11
N, 2-HREEIR WALLL WITH A-11 T.
HE
Al. IF
-a- L'AlIEL DODR A-12 11TERICA I $
L= I
NE
.1 IL—
— IT -EA".
A-,) ..".A -- .1
" USE
M7
1.
711 ITE
—1-CAL '=1
A A31'
1.
D ANP SITE PLLN
ELICTRIM FINE PLAN
C-1 GRED1.0"""'
C-2 _1— — WAR. SWIPPLI SISTER
Will— III IT. INFROWDERITI
S43
121
!�T
". ER.— T
APEL.11
c
I
D—.. PELTING PLAX
_L5 OF
COVERAGE CALCULATION
FOR RM-1.5 5UI3 015TRICT
FROM EDMON05 CITY CODE 16.30.030.A.TA13LE
PROPERTY AREA = 112,108 S.F.
COVERAGE (45%):50,448 S.F.
ACTUAL COVERED AREA
PRIMARY STRUCTURE: 41,186 5.F
CARPORT: 85b S.F.
5UI3-TOTAL 42,045 B.F.
SHELTER 225 S.F
rA—M--A—LITOTAL COVERED AREA:
*PER 5NOHOM15H COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR RECORDS
PROPERTY AREA = APPROX. 112,108 5Q.FT.
15'PFOPEFTY 5ETE5ACK LINE
Ailidercred Convakwaft
Center,.....
srrE PLAN TZ scaial"A:
—StUt1:001 - TYPE V. I HUM AS PER MIFOM NRDINQ Coot
RLLY _ ...
obdpb
FINE EU1 - 11
I'll IF I'll 1,131 So. IT. OR 1.53 ACRES. No. 01 LESS
A or RE:1
- . .... I W. IS.
ASIA III "1 ;,111-1 3 SO. IT
I WE
,MT.1�1; SOL I'S FIVE ACRE TUETS. AS PER FLAT REMOID
PAR . 'T IF
CEITIFIDTf OF NEE' , "o "Os
ME
$1TERATI IN TEE C=YOGWS:�'
U—c zov 3
PcOd des&WM
Y
accLEF"t o 39k we".. ALLINAEu
1;2
AA —I 1 —.1.
"RE tat I .2 KID$[
; - I 1 .7. So. 11.
AS.
1.1 IND AVE FOE YAM I[IIIIATIONS
TOTA� Atto_Lf . U,4. SQ. mcb—,
SITE PLAN 05 15 30
SCALE: V = 39 - CX SCALE V=30'-O"
c
REFERENCE DRAWING INFORMATION
DRAWING SHOWN 15 RECEIVED FROM EXTEDICARE, INC.
SOUTH PPOPEPTY LINES TAKEN FROM 5NOHOM15H COUNTY PROPERTY
ACCOUNT SUMMARY GENERAL INFORMATION AND ADDED TO DRAWING 13Y
HUNT ENGINEERING 5EPVICE5, INC.
PROPERTY SETBACKS DETERMINED FROM EDMON05 CITY CODE CHAPTER
16.30.030.A TADLE AND ADDED TO DRAWINGS DY HUNT ENGINEERING
5EPYICE5, INC.
SHELTER AREA ADDED TO DPAWNG5 DY HUNT ENGINEERING 5ERVICE5 INC.
COVERAGE CALCULATIONS SHOWN E5Y HUNT ENGINEERING SERVICES INC.
*4%
*4t*
1 40
*4%6
7-wT- ;- &I iz I I I � -:: I
--n
rn
JUL 19 2011
BUILDING DEPARt-WENT
CiTy OF MMONDS
&t-P 2-0/1 -C)47q
rql I
E, g 1,, e griog 1"S�e'r, I Xe s I n c
E
95410 .— RUNS ONERINEYSION 10, VIA =10
Pho-- 21RIA,42.50W47 Fm M.642AILE3
z
0
INERS
0
z
U)
w
z
00
z
LLI
w
U)
LU
z
Lu
c.)
w c
04
INAAA
C)
CD
It
VAN
C4
�)EA,V
NAL
HUNT ENG. JOB III.
11-150-010-00
DATE ISSUED:
JULY 19, 2011
FOR
REMSIONS:
/1\ crry COMMENTS
A
4/\ =
SHEET CONTENTS:
SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER;
SITE-1
OF
C�VINOVITQD -I P, HLRIET E.G.HEESHNQ SX-CES 1c,
w
----------------------
E4
4� ----------
so
4
tl 5 1(
r - - - -- - - - - - 117" o
mw" ---------
-TI --------
T
ST, "Dow
'(7 wit,
5.0
it
u I
-�S
_A111
wmoCjTOBW4.SANjIAgyo A I
-:-*--'sLm e�619AI35'1
7
. . . . . . ....
Ap.
'21
7
j REROUTE EX15TING 3" WATERLINE. PROVIDE NEW
E.- 3" DUCTILE IRON PIPING & CONNECT TO EX15TING.
1-21
PIPE TYPE PRIOR TO MATERIAL ORDER.
;7 T
AT VERIFY (E)
:Jr'
NEW 5HE IEF�qw I A�YERIFY (E) LOCATION PRIOR TO 5TART OF WORK.
LOCAT11ON. PROVIDE THPU5T 13LOCK5 AT EACH CHANGE OF
DIPECTION. PROVIDE CUT & PATCH A5 REQUIRED.
A15ANDON IN PLACE WHERE NOT ACCE55151-E.,
'_7
REMOVE PIPE WHERE ACCE55115I.E..
'7
r-------
5 2A�
C-Z- .
L
AND ��K �OCATIO. 0 1
f m
Zb
0
I va,
Vi
1-3
—30---
--- ---------
0 4
w C.Q.TA; t7b
UYDRANT
Iz\j
IIAN I It
I \: I %
FIRE vO
Ell
------------- ------- 50
4, PC C0.0 ICCWAL�
t f
0
'5-r q
Id'—c "IN
7?-'- AVE. W. CONSTRLCT Onp TO
w
SAM 51W� 611419 &AN. �Kwc�:
9xIwT.8' CONC
F T M- em5y LAW 00 —EXIST M. 4.
Xlb
aw ty CHECKFO
CA - ?P.A—
CT .9. ar .1. 1014�9 A'.
&'�iW WtT4 �"TAPPIN4
k.. . I . o .!; i 1, :30
.0 CXI�
I� vq�fcjzs *54,99 MAI. Cgo..g. D',CN,
4,COVOK bgIotfg TKII.4. ISI4AIL 59
TU 4,vA-6;AWO U-6' RgOVCM;
rmM 55—N4, GELGQ PrTAWN &%Wt,I. tAgI, 06 CONI—MO TO rn
957� (�oa AAOV) IN Miti. FOOT Wilrb =1 T�a. MCPOR CM06,
6. T�flr iOUR CLeANOUTS TO 4"Off 15WALL
16NF.—r. CITY Of 11-� 5T
-6 C2
REFERENCE DRAWING INFORMATION
SITE PLAN DRAWING 5HOWN 15 RECEIVED FROM EXTEDICARE. INC.
5CALE: V = 30'- a' 5HELTER AREA ADDED TO ORAWING5 5Y HUNT ENGINEERING SEPYICE5 INC.
WATER LINE REROUTING ADDED DY HUNT ENC71NEEFING 5EFACE5 INC.
RESL B1.1
JUL 19 2011
BUILDING DEPARI—MENT
OMONDS
CITy Of Ef
ervices 71nc
e.—Iw 1. WA MID
PIN,I- �Z!11147 Fm 200.042.690
z
z
U)
z
0
z
w
.j
ui
Lu W
m
z
w
LLJ c
04
r-
Q
.J C)
HUNT END. JOB
11-15"10-00
DATE ISSUED:
JULY 19, 2011
FOR
REIASIONS:
A\ CITY COMMENTS
SHEET CONTENTS:
SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER:
SITE-2
OF
1*N
EMERGENCY CALL
DOMELIGHT. CORNELL #L-101
IN CLEAR WIF ENCI-05URE
ARCHITECTURAL
5URFACE MTO. J-DOX
MATCH COLOR TO
VERTICAL P15EP.
EMERGENCY GALL
PU5H BUTTON.
CORNELL #E-103.
NOTE:
EMERGENCY CALL 5TATION AND
DOMELIGHT 5HALL 13E MOUNTED
IN51DE 5HELTER IN DRY LOCATION.
DOME LIGHT 5HALL 13E IA515LE
FROM OUT510E SHELTER.
S— �[ + 75" A.F.F.
PRE-MANUFACTUPED
5HELTEP P15ER TUBE.
6-- q + 46'A.F.F.
— 3/4�'E.C. 13Y 5HELTER
MANUFACTURER. #16 AWG
TO NUP5E CALL 5Y5TEM.
1-1/2" VERTICAL 915ER
UNDERGROUND 3/*'
CONDUIT & WIPE TO NUR5E
CALL 5Y5TEM. #16 AWG.
FRONT 510E
SHELTER VERTICAL RISER ELEVATION
5CALE: N.T.5.
SITE PLAN
5CALE: V = 201 - 0"
GENERAL NOTE5:
7
NEW NUR5E CALL EMERGENCY ?U5H
DUTTON 5TATION AND NEW NUR5E CALL
DOME LIGHT MOUNTED IN51DE NEW
. I
(ELTEP, IN PRY LOCATION.
< ALL WORK ON NUR5E CALL 5Y5TEM 5HALL
DE PERFORMED DY A CONTRACTOR
TRAINED IN THE IN5TALLATION OF CORNELL
NUR5E CALL 5YSTEM5.
:10
m
4
rn
ESU=I;r
UL 19 2011
BUILDING DEPARt-WENT
a =nMoNDS
9 %0- IN
s
rEnglildeeirinog I K I
gm m� Pmd W 6*�
P,� 206A42AW rr 1. W. =10
20&841694
z
0
z
x
Lu
z
ino
z
Lu
w
U)
4)
U) 3:
W w
z
ui
N
C)
DEAN
31885
L
HUNT ENG. JOB
11-150-010-00
DATE ISSUED:
JULY 19,2011
FOR
REMSIONS:
/1\ CITY COMMENTS
A
A
A
SHEET CONTENTS:
NURSE CALL
SYSTEM
SHEET NUMBER:
E-1
OF
cl I v - W-1-T a .11 �-V�
-aa Z
,�5?11 -0 q 7 LY
i r I
a
%
T- TR- e-- NC H "/pu I.-J.
-7-
9
7.(A
'VL^ TF
IN); Ttll�i� L- F) r--- N6 f I
T l\.; , TF �7) , 7Y,
T-,
�-)%`D HR" VVITO
T
A
L i k. L 1) v
:t
li v F., Te,
7 IJ,,
MI-It-'1Z, FAIT
I
DIS T R IC I L �� K EXCHANGE 2- 10
L - - M . / �
E LF V U Ge L. kt \.) 4
( L2 4)ND
�O I I'V%i. t7ND R-5- 7
�,j D rt
f-:�! .... f-1 T'
�I, J:' Tl Z ------
C) /N[., �)T. :, loV.
- I - - 11 - - I I � -.- - - . . I - . I , - I -- . - 11. - I - � I . . - .- .1 - , - � I - . I - 1-1 L -1 1.
13 �n / 7-T- 3 7-5-
DE pr/lo rR p iv r /v D'o " roe -,ReNCH DEPrH
40
-Mlil
2W
Rlw
4
4'
Z,
2 7/4 - 2
sEpap-p-no"
`/seLacx
)B)qaw- Fri LL-
U P I,;
Y � VVAIE. Tfi-
L L�
E -P T, (IV
Pt C. -T�'
9 f N LC- H 17L
V,
�ju
stcwc-: rei� N(.. H P.67r,5ti rP LbPE 7-RC-t4r-H MeT7,!:;M UP 7'4:> -4-j"
'Z 2-
7"i,)`,'1!-' RL 2 12 TH SL S W
SC RLL-�, NO N E
LM9f'N6 M;`5T PPbM 3o,.,�sroA7 72,VD W.
Ti-
MATERIA,
ACCT
IrmUN
MAT DESCRiPTION
QUANT,
ohlir
TOTAL
p- A - OSS ADUS .1 REMOVAL IMAINTEMANCE IRETIREMENTS I SALVAGE
CONSTRUCTION SECTION
LABOR HOURS
C
X w
CREW
SPLICE
SC"rD. START
ACTUAL START BY
DATE
SCHED coup
ACTUAL COMP By
DATE
. p
*IN
a —
co
Ic
I.1 �� 7 c �4 DATE
All i 'I -, , " APPROVALS
� U �� !�,t
Ul
P.
eEjcZ-rzX--7S
vVi 7W
SCALE- Z 3��'
IT B
Z7 4
JOINT POLE SECTION
J P N Numetot DATE
APPLICATION 40 DATE
RECORDS 8 DRAFTING
POSTED BY DATE
I - I
Lj�w- 1 4w -T
N 0
i pit Wi4m
14
CL
17
mu
6, Div
Posyro by
T 'I-)
0
s4-
7m (ao
T= SCP CON-rK4,c7-OFZl TI 0 (�DHNF_Cl, 5XI5-rlw,�
T= G/Z 7
i5s DRAIN LIN5 TO N5W 4KEA DRAIN
le �_17
"i 00 2di 601, V,/
. ...............
777
91
— — ----------
68
AKLrA
Z,
1`-Z !rt- -166, r: AIN
NN - NJO .3"5 of
N,
TOP E: L V. ��:p
t
A�IrZLL)L4, INV, 155 LS V.
17—
p V '5 A 7 'N ?S7
1115
N
7
Wv 54EI5
r
A Or� A IN!
el
L KIV 51,L all�. 3511
_n —a 'N
>
!:fti rn"�
_110
--352,
el
tj
7=.
7— - --- - It
f 10
CONC'.
361 7
If Wv, 35
kO
INV, -35p..51
UN- L A
�RAI IQ�
VC,
LNC
c
NN
10
F V/ C,
-TOP 5 1_5v, 3155,E) 'a
I wv� V, L)
r-4 z
VC P45s 5
1410
or
.0
IWV :3�55 0, 1
-T
3 .0
45E5 NO-1-5 K
R v I C, .1.1
r IVE
T_
'N
7
7
L J-7
4-
L
C)
07-
f
0
-4.
NIV
150
IV INV, �L-5v lo
>
J 4ZI p
/4 VC- jole
1 ac Pvc t .7
4_pv(;� 3-17, 310 1 N V, -35 2 6
N v __551115
TO F EFI: 5 3 (0141
I Nv 1,::: L. 51 1 v �344,
7- f--
10
9j
k I&I.
Are
win--
7,i
g
4-
r
340
0
J
INV �35510_ I(
v 51� ,0
INIV
FC—OL. Fe —4- p\/ I W v
E)
-50 L F WE ;-X-7C
P6T I
/�T T
Iwo,
NN loso
S\N CDNG, Aar 5 5 4.5 47 6S T z
fto
00
-ftwl -mm vow mom oorv�,/
7T
4 4
I co
7-- — — — — — — — — — —
O�js = �&
6�594_4m�mm -monk. moRw MOW NWW mb Amww mw moo
4M.6 Ao— WNW 'Mt* -AW -MW 'Wt� AWI-;
Typ5 I-C-
TYPE
724 Ave West TOP I, S V 5 4 J5,-7 -7 Y rV I- 'W� r, L) t�,? j5 T OF E I- 5v IB 15 4.5 cl,
I N\j 5L.5v 34,5100 AR�11& - INV E:L.5\/ I Z:' 34 8_9 L)
INV"- 1354.0
550
SE!F_ SW55 -,S 4" 349
FOR �61c�HT 4NL) Pl�,NTIH6
ec :QL�LE,
I Q r)-rF,
THE F'OUF;A, af�EA DKAINZ� Z�IPOWN AKF,
rO 'ItZ 4550C.5AI'40 1$.,�;KAYI%. C5t;10
01,
v
br
0
vn
Y,
>
IV
QZ
-�j
00 2di 60" v,/
----------
--368-
'A
It
1p
4
N
le,
x"
I b It
4-
-T
WYOKAN7r
--war
8 G, 0 "T
\N,
r
N,
W
�-7 rp 4
--352,
4
N,
71-
7—
J,
If
4-
4-
W N N 5, C-T TO 15 t, Q C4, 13A f4 1 T y e
*N,
�DNCRSTJ� ARrA la IfAN
IN.
W4SWN, WN,
t
T
V
f
a R v I C, It, t
--D L/
PRIVLM,
uj
CY)
/A\
z cy)
INII
uj
--w: L0
7 T >
<
Ti-
-3114W v4vF,
L7
/1 4 0
AND $OY. 3 W- 00
169
0 c\j
7
-A 9,5,
ILI NIP U
cd
TZ 4-4 0
PF 15,
c)
0
z 00
t
—X- T`�
cd
t It J
L
Z
0
0
01
10 <A 0 (
1-N 1-10 0 -D
(4)6) ,t
�4 (DO I V\/ /I',. z
T
U.1
U)
0 Lj
0
7,77
U) >
t
LU LLI
66 Ur IDE, �6� R �,A -J
+
/F
s uj
U)
Z , �, I I . 11
L.00A-] low
I " , I ., I I
14 4 x 4,
PT. C-5
0 V,
wing
1-v, x
6ast
INV 6
34-7.38 N,
I IWv 13 45. 80
4-
C)
0 N,
4- — T -ell
j 12) 44!'W
STA 0+-5D IN51ALL.-
N,
IF-11-st: WY RAN-) -4— Ux
too
OZ4
It
1 �4 5TA LL I N lbT4 L L\\
0 1,�� 44 'vV F155 HY �RAN
IRE WY
3: G35,V
\5 -WT
\jw5-r4LL- 13 M
,--'7'OP 16 Fm 54(P,O
-P I [q V. 8 1,6 5EF, 05r. 1z ILIT C,
S X I,-D 18 r- 0 F\ C, 5 MAIM
72N 11 AV E. W.: +
I N V, 3 41,,4 4
0+00
4 3.2- G
5XP5-17 8" CONC, 5AN 55-W5P, LAN15 8" !&AN. .55y\v5rz,
�Xl5r mw �51 5XI'Tr MP
5 x m P -3 EXIST MH 150
Awl 43 vv
mr2 'O'KA —A �(5 W
CHECKED
0\/E:F\ F-XI5-r 6" 5PJ 55W59
-VOP EFL,5V. 350,&13 IN!b-rAL.� cc,�5& LF 5" o,i, WA-V15T;� I -INS GAP�
Nr 5LOCK
SEE [)5TAIL5) 1\� (D T 5 DRAWN
N F- VV 5" C). 1, WA-rF, I< M A I W +
-1-0 F-XPbT (01' N/14IN VVIT14 &" '1-4 ppi N4 1:0
<E 3's 0 VY/U*-4,-7�59�
E. E� 4 VA L�v 9 ) A W I-) Lv 6 RF-C)L)r,6,K, i. Y\44595 5SW5R MAIN CK05515,5' 5XI!5TIN4
�N5 L L G. 1. VA LV5 OX �1. C CVC-: K (0 -r1uI::! -T, C—,Ulnl I PIP, -urv— JOB NO
F I K M 55AR I Nfj IGELSC;� PI7 FUN 59,KHL,1- 5PAU, ZE,� ( 0MPACjF- 1) To
(000, A4aPO) - IN CNI� PPOT -I0 TPF, Pp-vp5R co�Ac5,
-rH5-1 rOL)F2\ CLE:ANOU-r!�) To qKA05 5WALL-
GC:>N509N1 -T'O CITY OF 50MONJID5 51'ANOAR.0
05-rAIL-S DWCi E 5'rC 30a
A-r 4::e �.� 7'
VE
7