21404 84TH AVE W.PDF111111111111
7906
21404 84TH AVE W
ro
ea. 1,�.
- 1 0 �! ?
LL
.Zll -4�t
4v,
Al
L% 00
I
ie)4 W
V-15 -�49
.. . . . .. I. I _Wlt, ., . I . . .
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWN NAA�E - - -_ 011116404Eeso
a: ric-1-14M 1�). ;VC_Z5C--AJ%�
UJ MAILING ADDRESS
Z A� / V
0 , (
0 A/iE , m).
CITY ZIP TTMELEPHONE NUMBER —
I EejM0A16 5
INAME
ADDRESS
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER
NAME'
ii� C., 0,j
ZDRESS
Vol
ZIP6 [TELEPHONE NUMBER
62, V
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION D�TE
�&7_ —'
IV0 Al._
Leqal Description o.f Property - include all easements
USE
ZONER RMIT
PE
NUMBER
JOB
ADDRE55 SUITE/APT #
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP.
EXISTING — REQUIRED DEDICATION
PROPOSED
METER SIZE LINE SIZE I NO. OF FIXTU�
MEMO DATED -V /,
TESCP Approved
0
RW Permit Required
0
Street Use Permit Req'd
0
inspection Required
1%
Sidewalk Required
0
cc
PRV REQUIRED
W
YES 0 NO 13
Z
cc
uj
W
9
A.X9,0
SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW
ALLOWED ROPOSED COMPLETE ;- EXEMPT
EXP
IANCE OR CU P IffNIEW BY
I
Ca4 1, A
SETBAi
Propertu E. FRONT
Tax Account
Parcel No. —090-6140 —06o
7
NEW
RESIDEN�IAL
PLUMBING
ADDITION
COMMERCIAL
MECHANICAL
APT. BLDG,.
El
REMODEL
SIGN
GRADING
FENCE
REPAIR
— CYDS..
I _X _FT)
DEMOLISH
WOODSTOVE
INSERT
SWIM POOL
HOT TUB/SPA
GARAGE
RETAINING WALL1
CARPORT
ROCKERY
RENEWAL
ZI
BUSINESS 9f ACTIVITY) EXPCAIN.
j,n NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL
uj
0 OF DWELLING AREAS
C 0 UNITS NUMBER
0 STORIES I I
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN)
REVIEWED
HEIGHT ILOT&OVERkA
SIDE 7/Z, REAR
OCCUPANT
REQUIRED YE LOAD
.REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305
:��4 FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED -
PLAN CHECK FEE
BUILDING
HEAT SOURCE-
GLAZING
%
PLUMBING
Plan- Check No.
MECHANICAL
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY.
GRADINGIFILL
Any construction on the public domain (curte, sidewpiks,
STATE SURCHARGE
driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.
Permit Application:180.Days
Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provi�4ftrk,ls Started Within 180 Days
STORM DRAINAGE FEE
30
"A�plicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and
ENG*. IN�PECTION FEE
successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold�,
u0i
harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials,
X.
employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
<
w6atever nature.,.arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance
of this permit', Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
modify, waive'or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
TOTAL OUNT DUE
0
x
nor limit in any wpy the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
provision."
I hereby acknowledge that 1 -have read this application; that the
Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or this duly
ATTENTION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and
state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authgriz-
THIS PERMIT
AUTHORIZES
T . his application is not a permit until
.ed thereby, no person will be employed In violation of the 4abor
ONLY THE
signed by the Building Official or his/her
Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Co�06ensa-
WORK NOTED
Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is
tion Insurance and RCW 18.27,-.,
INSPECTION
acknowledged in space provided.
SIGNA,7T 'RE.(O%!�L ER,�_AGENT) DAT
DEPARTMENT
001,
CITY OF
OFFICIAVS SIGNAT DATE
EDMONDS
ATTENTION
C,
REL ASED BY: D E
INSPECTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE
UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR
771-0220
ORIGINAL — File YEIF &I —'InSDec to I
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC
CHAPTER 3.
PINK 11,C)l r) — Acqaqcnr
_j
Q.
-\ ------------ !-
0
_N TO.
T.S.
...ADDl
EDMONDS.
'NO. 9-
-2- BLOCK 4, ALDERWOOD MANOR -
a.
COUNTY,
j,TY-: OFz':*. EDMONDS SNOHOMISH'
WASHINGTON w,
K ST PC% \M ��t
I EAST G45.09
iz5..Oo.
s000 �,Fz 75.00,
L 75'. , "' 1 1 78,00, 78.00, 78,00, 75.00, 80.09, '60,
ul
0
ci
0
z
1(y. u+1 11+
y
i"f
of
ri
1A 0
a
-76.00.
EAST.
!130.001
RAM
77
715.00.
io
0
z
)01
'75.00,
2: o
5
cy ri
0 0
z ci
N
78.00* .78.00, 78.00* 79.42'
EAST 544.25� ri
in
N Ld
78.00* 15.0a 15.00, 186 W. 0
713.013, SCALE: 10
j N
.
0
z
14 15 IG
Of N
0 0
N
7B.00. 78.00, 75.00, 7 aLoo, 7 8.4 Z'
"EAST. G A5. 4 Z,
RECEIVE-
D,
OCT
o 1 -_T975
890 . 19 C� -
, " V
rA.
1995
_i�iG DEPT.
CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR
HEARING EXAMINER
FINDINGS2 CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICANT: William Nelson, Sr.
CASE NO. V-95-66
LOCATION: 21408 84th Avenue West
APPLICATION: A variance to reduce the total required street setback adjacent to the east
property line from 25-feet to 18-feet to allow the addition of a single -story
second garage bay onto an existing garage which already encroaches into
the required street setback by 6-feet.
REVIEW
PROCESS: Variance: Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final
decision.
MAJOR
ISSUES: A. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN71AL - Site
Development Standards)
B . Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (E CDC)
Chapter 20.85 (VARIANCES)
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff Recommendation: Approve with conditions
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approve with conditions
PUBLIC HEARING:
After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and
after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. 77he
hearing on the Nelson application was opened. at 9:15 a.m., June 15, 1995, in the Cornmunity
Services Conference Room, 250 5th Avenue, Edmonds; Washington, and closed at 9:23 am.
Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are fisted in the minutes of the
meeting. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the Planning Division.
a Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities international — Hekinan, Japan
William Nelson
File No. V-95-66
Page 2
HEARING TESTIMONY:
'Me following is a summary of the testimony offered at the public hearing.
From the City:
Kirk J. Vinish, Project Planner, reviewed the staff report (Exhibit A) which concluded that the
request met the variance criteri&
From the Applicant:
William Nelson, Sr., said he purchased the property in October 1994 with the intent of
constructing die proposed garage on the site. He said he was not aware of the large setback
requirements when he bought the property. He agreed to conform with the conditions of
approval recommended by staff.
From the Community:
No one from the general public spoke either in favor of or in opposition to the variance request.
WRITTEN COMMENTS:
No written comments were submitted by members of the general public.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION:
A . Site Description
1. Site Development and Zoning
a) E=:
(1) Im- The subject property is approximately 8,106 square feet in area. The
proposed garage would be located in the south eastern portion of the
property approximately 13-feet from the south property line (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 4).
(2) Zonin : The zoning of the subject property is Single Family Residential
(RS-8).
(3) Terrain and Ve=tation Ile subject property is fairly level, with an overall
downward slope from the north property line to the south property line,
with all open arm fully landscaped (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4).
2. Neighboring Development and Zoning:
a) E=:
(1) North: Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned RS-8.
(2) South Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned RS-8.
(3) Eaz Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned RS-8.
William Nelson
File No. V-95-66
(4) Page 3
_W= Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned RS-8.
b) -Conclusion: The proposed development would be consistent with the
surrounding zoning and development.
B . History
a) E =:
(1) The subject property was annexed to the City on August 21, 1959 and was
zoned RS-8.
(2) In 1959, the street setback requirements for the RS-8 zone appear to have been
15-feet see Exhibit A, Attachment 5).
(3) Permits for construction of the home were issued on November 10, 1959 (see
Exhibit A, Attachment 5).
(4) 'Me home appears to be legally nonconforming with respect to street setback
requirements.
C . Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance
1. Compliance with RS-8 Zoning Standards
a) E=:
(1) The fundamental site development staindards in a RS-8 zone are set forth in
Chapter 16.20.030.
(2) Minimum street setbacks in the RS-8 zone are 25-feet
b) Conclusion - Except for the requested street setback variance, the applicant is
proposing to build a structure which conforms to the RS-8 development
standards for locating structures on a lot.
2. Compliance with requirements for a Variance
ECDC Chapter 20.15B. 180A, states an applicant may request a variance from the
standards of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC Chapter 20.85
(Variances). Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby a
provision of the Code may be varied on a case -by -case basis if the application of the
provision would result in an unusual and unreasonable hardship (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 2).
a) Facts:
(1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which a
variance request must comply in order to be granted by the Hearing
Examiner. Ilese criteria i4clude: a special circumstance must exist; no
special privilege is granted; the proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code-, the proposal will not be
detrimental and is the minimum necessary..
Willi�.m Nelson
File No. V-95-66
Page 4
(2) Variances may be used to modify bulk standards. They may not be used to
modify use or procedural requirements.
(3) 'Me property was annexed to the City -and the home constructed in 1959.
(4) In 1959, the front setback requirements appear to have been 15-feet.
(5) A field survey of the street revealed that most home on the street have existing
setbacks similar to the applicants.
(6) The applicant's home appears to be legal non -conforming with respect to front
setback requirements.
b) Conclusions:
(1) SMial Circumstances
Special circumstances include the size, shape topography, location or
surroundings of the property and public necessity for public structures.
In this case, the applicant wants to construct a garage, on an existing single
family dwelling. The additional garage is proposed to be adjacent to the
existing gar -age and will be 14-feet, 6 inches wide and 18-feet, 6-inches long.
The subject property is approximately 8,106 square feet in area ' and is legal
nonconforming, and zoned RS-8. Other homes in the immediate vicinity have
similar circumstances and have constructed similar additions. Special
circumstances exist, therefore, due to the location of the existing dwelling
already in the setback and that alternative locations for the garage are not
feasible (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2 and 5).
(2) SMial Privifte
It does not appear that any special privilege will be demonstrated in granting
this variance in that other properties in the same zone with similarly sized lots
would also qualify for a variance (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2).
(3) Zoning Code and the CompLehensive Plan
Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the continued development
of the site in a manner consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and the
Comprehensive Plan designation of the site (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2).
(4) Not Detrimental
Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2).
(5) Minimum Required
The request is the minimum necessary for accommodation of the garage (see
Exhibit A, Attachment 2).
William Nelson
File No. V-95-66
D Technical Committee Page 5
1 . Review by City Departments
a) E=:
(1). No comments were submitted by other departments.
E . Comprehensive Plan (ECDC)
1 . Comprehensive Plan Designation
a) E=:
1) The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Low Density
Residential. .
b) Conclusion
1) The proposed project is consistent with the Low Density Residential
designation in the Comprehensive Plan.
DECISION:
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions, the request is approved, subject
to the following conditions:
I - This variance is to allow the proposal in the location identified on the proposed site plan
(see Exhibit A, Attachment 3). Any other structures, additions or remodels would have
to conform with the typical setbacks or height requirements for the zone or obtain
another variance.
2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances.
3. The applicant must obtain a building permit prior to construction.
4. The peri�it should be transferable.
Entered this 19th day of June, 1995, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner
under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
Ron McConnell
Hearings Examiner
William -Nelson
File No. V-95-66
Page 6
RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and
appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the
Planning Department for further procedural information.
A . Request for Reconsideration
Section 20. 100.0 10.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or .
recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) worldrig days of the date of the -
initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance
register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract
of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration
request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the
ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed.
B . Appeals
Section 20.105.020.A and B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the
decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the
name of the individual group appealing the decision,,,their interest in the matter, and reasons
why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. 'Me appeal must be filed with the
Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the
decision being appealed.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building pennit, or if no building is
requimd, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the
conditional use perinit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for
an extension of the time before the expiration date.'
EXHIBIT
'Me following exhibit was offered and entered into the record:
A. Planning Division Staff Advisory Report with 5 attachments.
PARTIES OF RECORD
William Nelson, Sr.
21408 84th Avenue West
Edmonds, WA 98020
Planning Division
Engineering Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Public Works Department
No
4-
n
Us on)
y rolo V
site AddressA-ocation:
2- Property Tax Account Number.- -9 6
_ L'O&&-tOO-016-0007
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed7. -X yes; _ no.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
I-;-
Flat:. less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rollmg:. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance.of 66-teet).
Hilly.--, slopes Present on fite of more than 15% and less than 30% (;a vertical rise
of 10 eet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
is
rrn, -t gradcs'bf gieaterithan 30%. p t on site (a v cal ti e of 10-feet
Steepa, re= over a
qM-Y IMOIN ntabdisti"qf less than 33-1ed)L
-G
-4 01 Y;
a-, Vu -R5 PO
ing VrAW.
Ss .,�,tj 0
..,year-rou W.
9W
--.MT-- A I
t stagon(s) pfth
3.6,tiOM ttvff,
va`�a.watercourse�'I?.
rid,om ac= the growds surf
4
'47
05
;1,., 'Site is
sc -typers)? r L.. L
:Art ;0
Cri
v-"A W014Utig tocy.or CA
litiven
Areavpidfa?
tarth subsideum-lan"ide hazotd
I ed atip
...�
4
MNATFON.,
RED-
IFREQUI
j 'IV
-A -EW,
MA
'a
-_T
N
Y.N.-Ag
X. "Im-Ar, �Q - "&z
�e Irb
890-19q
City of Edmonds
Critical Areas Checklist
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on
and submit it to the City. The City will
this form is to be filled out by any person
review the checklist, make a precursory site
preparing a Development Permit
visit, and make a determination of the
Application for the City of Edmonds prior
subsequent steps necessary to complete a
tohisthersubmittal,,'dfa-devclopment
development permit application.
permit to the City.- - -W
With a signed copy of this form, the
ist
Ile purpose. of the Checkl istoenabje..'�.�_'-'
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
City staff to d6teitmine whether any
or plot plan -foijndividual.lots of the parcel
potezitial'Criti,(�AI.Artis�ar6-dr niay'b6--:
with enough detail that City staff can find
preseit th�ce subject property.
and. identify the.subject parcel(s)_ in
informatiodniMid7 jjjkj�edj�"* midditkin, appfi�;4 shat6jude
.-.S':�-.-;,.Check1is;t'should*
qeasdytayailkjo.�Fwm�xL.
44othei; i4d n
or data available at.
ra Oc.);or stitdies in
plan, topog phy.qntp,
4y_. <C4ticW.Aimsin
C Hall ven rips. maps.
coidunction with this Ch6ckU& t
�0
& soil iurve
�affin'cotnplefing th eir p
t
Owner Applicant.-'.
AppricantR4ipresentative:�--..'-4�")N;:.i':,�:.i.:�.'-
Z`A S
Name
S had
Strad
W
City'State, ZIP`
aty. Sute. zW y C! j 17?, -Phone
Signatur�:/-I.
Signature Dat�:
PLANNING DATA
SITE ADDRESS: 11!�Qy 2���DATE: sl-
f I f ,
ZONING: /a - ?:�� PLAN CHK#: � 5--s -,?
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 2c� Left Side: -7112, Right Side:--7/2— Rear:
Actual Setbacks:
Front: Left Side:— Right Side: Rear:
CORNERLOT aV;zS
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED---ALr-A-,-njA -nVvE
LOT COVERAGE:
Maximum Allowed: 262o'z L3ejlv Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:
I
SUBDIVISION:- 14AAVgC�95 A7391-IIJ-2nd -M
CRITICAL AREAS #: 6A -15--2- q WA Mr�
SEPA DETERMINATION:
LOT AREA:
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
�.c
as:� e
n I
W r:(soi1s1t6p'ogr'aP'h
n 0
1. Site Address/1.4cation: 1::121�zael_
2. Property Tax Account Number. 000- 016, -0007
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed.? _X yes; — no.
If yes; how is site developed?
5.- Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat:' less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
AN
1�plling:. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of Meet over a, 7
horizontal distanc� of 66-fed).
-Hflly:..,,. slopes present on eite of more than 15% and less thad 30% a vertical &6-r.�
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
greater, over a
1 grades�of 'than 30%. present on eite (a vertical rise of 104bet
k,7.,t&,jz k,4qrizontaI,4dis6"of less than 334eet). C,
X) In IVA
qr
ease
Z, - . f
(ON no
ip-S water.
A
-6. Sft contains abus of u6d AW tj at:
A
ofseasonaUpm!tjjW&ater-,.,, tz&
ntains
90�
JL
"Abhil in(s),bfthi y&O. V,_*t-6i*
M _-N
WWI
awatercourm
Mft is. e fl6od"y
Qj
k.,_19.1w �y
52:contam a cm*.APWea,*M flows MM ace? Hows are
groundssurf Y
i 'Olwidds *etlifid is present on sitc
l M7_415 �= 7_1i�d 7.
I, AW
Vr
.v--.-:--SCS-nnPPed soil-we(sY
'�'ffi i Mia0o�ry -kO
j �
3P. vrel _q[AZ?A,. �=pjWicateswetlwW pnmn(40G
,ti inventorY Ot C.A:'marindici6 Critical Ama Go ?
AtIp
dU6w1d".-"hmdM'eaA subbidenw-landslide bazu*a�l AM
-.off e EwAwii
V
RV
S:
X
6
K
5"D
M,
nr�(.C- 0
N.
R,
-JA
�V AW
M04
T
V
-.p------ -
Ian
0,
stew
x�
9 9
City of Emonds I I .. . . . ''
Critical Areas...,Chec* klist
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on and submit it to.the City. The City will
this form is to be filled out b,y any person review the checklist, make a precursory site
preparing a� Development Permit vistt;'and make . a detehnination of the
Application for the City of Edmonds prior iwbs'equent steps necessaxyto complete a
to hLVhet-submitfid�.6f:�rdevelcipmditiwotbvto -4deVelo�mentpermitapp caft n.;----
0
perf n i t to th e C i ty.-,
O-C Mith 2,sig=4 -.copy. of this fbrm,the.,,�,
'OR, ' ' ""-I,
rh t. o 46,Checklistis to ppablie 'i ipplicinrshould-aHo submitai vicinity
ty
ne,,�r"e���i*09"f,�,or.plot�planfor,,,individual�lots of the
'Nam
Stobd,:Add
APPLICATION
CUREET FILE for
The City of Edmonds SIEDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No . ..........................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION r-1 REPAIRS
324 04300
OWNER ......... Mrs-..--B.r.i.t-a ... C.....W.inder ............................................... CONTRACTOR .................................................................................................. PERMIT No . ......................
ADDRESS ..... ?1.404 ... 84t-h ... A.ven-ue ... W .................................. ............... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No - ---------------------------------------------- BLOCK No . ............................................
........ ....... .. ... ..... -..
0
0
NAMEOF ADDITION .........................................................................................................................................
Dye Tested On Sewer 1972
Approved:
DATE................................................ By ......................................................................