21405 73RD PL W.PDFIIIIIIIIIIII
5827
21405 73RD PL W
E- �MWW'
c--�, C,), 15
C--
ADDRESS:221 Cz� 4 215( ')
2
t I
TAX ACCOUNTIPARCEL NUMBER: 00�-�01?scocc[�50n
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):20D I C6 2-5
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:kM-kct WZ 2QQ I 0s D
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: El Conditional Waiver Ej Study Required V51�aiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER): IM24WcYO
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE:s * Is, F-,o LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: a-z-& -�04
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
L\TEMP\DSrs\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc
0 4p
ADDRESS: ,I/ �105 et 9/ 1-/Q 7 IS��' P(- lkllz,55 &
,-91,!0 7,�cA150-5-
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: 0 Conditional Waiver F] Study Required E] Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED
PERMITS (OTHER):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
SHORT PLAT FILE:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SOILS REPORT DATED:
LID
LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
STREET USE/ ENCROACHMENT PERMIT#: ()2--jqe17
--- OAIAII'A At/ 14--71 AAA J It , )
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
LATEMP\DSTs\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc
1-4 C. 18 9 \3
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771.-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November2l,2002
Hossein Ahmadnia
122 NE 158th St
Seattle, Wa 98155
Re: Request for Address Change
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia;
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
This letter is to inform you that your request for an address change has been
granted. The old address of 21405 73m PI W is nOW 21507 73'rd PI W and
21407 73rd PI W is nOW 21505 73rd PI W. This may seem confusing at first
but the numbers must get smaller as they go north SO 21507 must be south of
21505. 1 will inform all City Divisions including Fire, Police, Utility Billing, Public
Works and Building.
It is your responsibility to inform the Post Office, the Phone Company for
Enhanced gil emergency purposes and all other interested parties of this
correction.
3 Si cerely,
c Y'
r�aPalma *er
Permit Coordinator
City of Edmonds
Cc: Fire Department
Police Department
Utility Billing
Public Works
Building Official/Street File
L\Temp\DST's\Master Letters\Address Change
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Nov 2 1 02 01:09p
Virage Logic Carp.
(425)746-869.3
0
P. 1
Nov 21, 2002
Fax: 425-771-0221
Attn: Lara Palmatier
Hi Lara,
I am requesting a change to the following addresses:
Old Address New Address
2140573 d pl W 2150573 rl pl W
21407 73' P1 W 21507 73 �dpjW
The current addresses do not correspond with the street crossing
Best Regards,
Hos - A4madTu'a,-
,sein
W�-C— //- U-11
206-715-0747
-CEIVED
121 2002
BUILDING DEPT.
-I.q C. 1 S 913
0 1 . . . q i� . 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (Q5) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 21, 2002
Hossein Ahmadnia
122 NE i58th St
Seattle, Wa 98155
Re: Request for Address Change
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia;
J.
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
This letter is to inform you that your request for an address change has been ..
granted. The old address Of 21405 73rd P1 W-is nOW 21507 7*3rd P1 W and
21407 73rd P1 W is nOW 21505 73rd P1 W. This may seem confusing at first
but theinumbers must get smaller as they go north SO 21507 must be south of
21505. 1 will inform all City Divisions including Fire, Police, Utility Billing, Public
Works and Building.
It is your responsibility to inform the Post Office, the Phone Company for
Enhanced 911 emergency purposes and all other interested parties of this
correction.
9 Si cer4ely,.
a Pa�lma *e
r
Permit Coordinator
City of Edmonds
Cc: Fire Department
Police Department
Utility Billing
Public Works
Building Official/Street File
L\TaM\DST's\Master Leaen;\Address Change
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Nov 21 U2 UI:UZJP virage Logic Lur-pi.
Nov 21, 2002
Fax- 425-771-0221
Attn: Lara Palmatier
Hi Lara,
I am requesting a change to the fol.lowing addresses:
Old Address ' New Address
21405 73,d pl W 21505 73rd PI W
21407 73d PI W 21507 73"d PI W
The current addresses do not correspond with the street crossing
Best Regards,
H 41,madry
206-715-0747
ED
BUILDING DEPT.
K'OTTF- NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY
The inforrinatic-i. cl,.r-kvn h
ci t e
7j, V,= cc--mv -- fc� uze by the Go of
Do, City at Edmonds does nct
c-o the n, ap. Any person or entity a c I -py
co
to in � endent inquiry regarding t1k. injcr�j-,,=�cn c,"' c 71
bu, not limited to, the locaJon at eny
may or may not e)d,-;It and m ay or rr,:.,, ncl.
Neithe, the City of Edmonds ncr its ci"npIqi' z3 or
Offics-i's S�42!1 ba 11L�.!aft, the information given onthis map, norfor �ny orJ
rejorasew"on provided based upon said map
0 0
> z 0
* rg --A :;0
z X M 6-4
>
c')
0
00
X, — -----
> 0 -n L4
0 0 .
0 0
V) 0, (D
>
coo 0 =r
:3 0
-<;a 0
> 4S.
z
c�
2.
0
CL
0
CD
W
0 Lo
0 'a 0 (A
K: M :e 000 --1
M C D
0
(n
(D
z * CD (1)
M cD 0
:E 0
CD 0
z -0
M
(10
C)
>
0
Cl�
12TH PL N
M
RETURN ADDRESS:
City of Edmonds, City Cierk
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
�c 7.77
FILE
-00WORMED COPY
,2-001'08107-0284
08/07/.2001 1.2*.42'PM Snohomish
P.�0002 RECORDED ' County
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVEN -ANT
-MULTI-FAM-ILY RESEDENTIAL
Reference #: do 0
Additional on pg.
Grante6(s): CijX of Edmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec—,,�L��Twn--j4.�9-21t—�Qt
OR Lot --imock ]at
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s):
_---jAssestor's Tax Parcel lD# not yet assigned
WBEREAS,
are the owners of the followingdescribed real estate in the City of �dmonds, to wit:
Property
Legal Description: #
Assessor's Tax Parcel JUD W (s): - 40 000
AUTHORIZEDIFOR RECO]WING
C, of.Edmonds
By: Dat
Page of
WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive
covenant upon said premises in compliance with -Section 19-00-040 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code. WITNESSETH, t I hat for and in
consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and -grant to
the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -;wit:
That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the JGrantors have agreed to the
Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for 'multiple family housing
may be erected on subject property --containing more than 12 b 4 . units.
Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate -and
their heirs, successors and assigns.
DATED this - day of
GRANTOR
GRANTOR
State of Washington
County of 4aok . 6) )ss
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized I to execute the
instrument and acknowledged it as the 01 _,*� (title) of
Toyfeoy_ (name of party on behalf on whom instrument wag executed) to be
the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentions 'in this
instrument. 'Subscribed and sworn to'before me this day.of Z01-Y
M
..........
Notary Pu Bc in and for the' State of Washington.
0
OTA#1�
MW 0 -am
MY commission expires�_.
0% PUBLIC
C�
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
City of Edmonds
By:- �&J� Date -
Page - -ca of - __ _.�_
L:X7'EMP\BUIILDING\FORMS\RES7RICT
-1-11 C. i S 9 "J
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
February 27, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
Thank you for meeting with Lyle Chrisman and me on February 26, 2003 to discuss the concerns
addressed in your letter of February 20, 2003. After discussing your concern s with you and your
brother, we summarized them into three primary issues, which I would like to address as follows:
1. You feel you were sinjZled out and treated ingppropriately by Cily Engineering Division
staff during the plan review and inspection of your p1pject.
Your allegations that Engineer Division staff singled you out and treated you in a
prejudicial and discriminatory manner are very serious allegations and are taken seriously
by the City. Please be assured that it is the City's policy to treat all developers in a
professional and consistent manner, as necessary to ensure compliance with applicable
codes and approved plans.
After reviewing your letter and your comments in our meeting, and looking into the
project history, I must take exception to your allegations. Although your project had
some site constraints that led to frustration for you in obtaining permit approvals, and
some inspections resulted in disapproval and re -inspection, I believe our staff acted in a
professional and consistent manner in our dealings with you.
Nonetheless, it is clear that you are quite passionate in your perception of your treatment
by Engineering Division staff. During our meeting, you agreed that there is nothing that
can be done to change any past actions. However, I assured you that I will counsel our
Engineering Division staff to make sure that we all have an appreciation for how our
actions and procedures inay be perceived, and that we make sure that we deal with all
developers in a professional, consistent, and respectful manner.
2. You believe that the Edmonds Communily Development Code (ECDC) needs to be
revised so it can be uniformly and consistently applied.
We agree. It has been a number of years since the ECDC has had a major update, and
there are a number of areas where it could be clearer and easier to interpret. The
Development Services Director had planned to undertake the significant task of a major
Incorporated August 11, 1890
C'.. - � — rl!— LJ - I.: - - - I ----
code update in 2003. Unfortunately, due to significant budget cuts this year, the City
Council was not able to approve the funding in the 2003 budget that the Development
Services Director requested, to accomplish this task.
Therefore, the best we can do for the foreseeable future is to continue to address and
clarify individual issues on a case by case basis. If you can provide us specific
recommendations to improve specific sections of the ECDC, that would be helpful and
greatly appreciated.
3. You want City qpproval to not remove that asphalt '!parking Mace" that we have directed
you to remove and replace with landscgping per the approved plans. .
As we discussed, there are actually two corrections directed by Mr. Cbrisman's letter of
January 24, 2003 that, as of our meeting, you had not completed. You were directed in
that letter to 1) remove the block wall from the City right of way, and 2) remove the
asphalt area in the front yard that could be used as a parking space and restore
landscaping per the approved plans.
During our meeting, you agreed to remove the block wall from the right of way.
Regarding the asphalt "parking space", you explained that you do not intend this to be a
parking space and that your intent is that it be a walkway extension from your previously
existing sidewalk.
As we agreed, you will submit a revised plan requesting City approval for a sidewalk
extension in this location. I explained to you that the City's concern is that this not be
later converted back to, a paved- area that could be used for parking because it does not
meet City standards and would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised
plan must include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to park a vehicle.
In other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example, the
landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the "parking space".
We are always working to improve our processes and procedures, and I thank you for providing
us your input.
Sincerel
DAVID K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Mayor Gary Haakenson
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
To: Mayor Gary Haakensons
City of Edmonds
To- Mr. David K. Gebert, PE
City of Edmonds
Dear Mr. Gebert,
RECEFIV,EL)
MAR 10 2003
LINGiNEEFUNG
DIVISION
RECEIVED
MAR 0 7 2003
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Thank you for meeting with my brother and I on February 26, 2003 to discuss the issues
that I presented to you attention on my letter dated February 20, 2003. 1 will comment to
same three primary issues that you summarize on your letter on February 27, 2003 below:
Even though you -have assured me on your letter and during the meeting that
the City Engineering Division "deal with all developers in a professional and
consistent, and respective manner", this has not been my personal experience.
I don't think it is helpftil to dismiss my concerns as a personal feeling and not
acknowledge inconsistent or improper actions by the Engineering department
staff. I still clairn that Ms. Danielle Gilbert, City Engineering Division staff
Engineering inspector, has over step her authority to contact my brother and I
on Feb 18 and find her comments and warning to me during that call out of
line. Even though, I can't prove what she said to me over the call, I'll send
you a receipt from our cell phone carriers which will show the time and phone
number that her call originate from. Following her call, a notice was posted
on my property from the Building department within 48 hours. Her call was a
continuation of problems she presented to me over the course of her
inspections. I had difficultly with all of the inspections she performed. If you
review all other inspections perform on this;project, examples Building and
Fire, and take the time to talk to those inspectors you'll find all those
inspections we done without any difficulty. So, it is not right to dismiss the
problem as project constraint but rather acknowledge there is merit to my
claim and maybe Ms. Gilbert conduct through my and my project has not been
proper.
2. It is interesting that the only thing you did acknowledge during our meeting is
the necessity for major upgrade to ECDC code for which there are not
sufficient funds at this time. What I was hoping to hear is that you'll review
the engineering practices of Engineering Department. I agree the no code is
perfect, however, that doesn't take a way the requirement of good engineering
practice of consistent interpretation of existing code and timely response. It
took well over six months and number of register letters to get an approval for
the width of access road to the project. During this time, the Engineering
Department insisted on requiring an extra 2 times 'shy distance' width to the
4!
access road that is not in the code. It took the intervention of senior
department engineer to drop this subjective requirement.
3. During the meeting we agreed to remove the block wall and we had already
done that. We stated the paved asphalt area in front was not a 'parking space'
as it is not big enough for this purpose. Also, we don't need to create an
additional parking space since we have ample parking both on and off the
property. We stated that we needed the paved area as a continuation to the
paved surface to the house. You agreed. We have lined the paved area with
stone blocks on both sides and added back landscaping. This should meet your
concern. Please see the revised plan.
Sinc/eFe/ly,
a,Ss a
;17lo -3
L/33
So"-ftlk- 1-4L
tical Areas Checklist
'Site Information (sdils/tdpography/hydrology/vegetation)
1. -Site Addiess'lLocatiow. 9.-3.rcl. Pt. k-D M., as
r. 2. Property Tax: Acoount 57 25 000 9
Vurnbw. 01b
3- Approximate Site Size (acresor square fed): 2— 1)
.4. b1his site currently. developed.? ____yes; I/ no.
If yes;,how is site developed?.......
5. Describe the generalsite topography. -Check M dig apply.
Flat less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
-49.
0
C
S14 ID
'40
VA, 41 9SO
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-fed).
I illy. slopes present onsite of more than 15% and less than 30% a vertical rise'
of 10 eet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66 eet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of I 9-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site c6ntat ns areas of yea r-round standing water. A�O _;Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. Approx.- Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is ii the floodway floodplain of a Qat& course-
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round?.. Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
I I.. Obvious wedand is present on site:
For City Staff Use On IF
1. Site is Zoned? Z 4
2-. SCS snapped soil type(s)? -72 - vr-bAft L&,�,
3. Wetland inventory or C—A. map indicates wedand present on site?
7,,Qitical Areas inventory orC-A.-inap indicates-C&fcal. Area on site?
j
5�, within desig"nated earth subsidence landslide hazard area9
Site designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas MarP
METERMINATIO
JDYREQUIRED CONDITIONAL WAIVER
--- -------
W,A VER
_J
7
.,,....,Revi6w�dby;.-
�—Manner Date
i.Z
A
z
s
.890 - 19,4
Ci 10�6iiift
X
reas -:.'C- hetkftt'
C116*11itt dkkitained -bn� i -Si6mit it 4ne City will
to the City.
this Wrin is to be filled out by any pex-son Oim the che�klistmake a precurso;� site
preparing a DevelopmentTermit visit,- and make a doermination of the
Application for the City of Edmonds pnor, - subsequent steps necessary to Complete a
to his/her submittal.ofa. t,
devd[opnientpenifit2pplication.�7,�.
permit to the City.
With a signed c9py of this form, the
Mw purpose of- the Checklist is to enable '15howd;a][M submit a jdcinit� map
City staff to determine whedw any dividuai lots of the parcel
A.
potential Critical Areas are or may be - - with enough detail that City staff can find
presenton the subject proputy. ., Jbe�% . - In'—, � , -
_.and idetifify the subject parcel(s).
infox malii� - ni:� t-0 compide the additiozi, the app8cant shail include,
Checklist should be easily ava-ibble
from other Pertinent inforn�ation (e.& site
obsenmfionsof the-siteor dati available. aif 'topigra.-i3lij niap, etc -)'or studiei in
CityEW (Critical, Areas inventories, nuips. icordunction with this CIbe&ral to as�M —
or soil. surveys)...
Staff in Completing their preliminar*y,
1-assessinent of thesite.
An applicant,'br hiAci representative',
must fill out the checklist, sign anddate it,
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owneirl Applicant:
Appr"nt Representative:
OALIL Kam J
il Natne 77
Street Address
Stred Addn:ss
;3TV1 Y), 'iMr'
S, z 16o�
city, State, ZIP Phone,-, aty, State� UP Thone
V z",
�7
=7-
Signature
x- A mature
ate
4
Le
!Y
W
4e
4m , W- , . W . !, - W G
DA ZoneG 1/4, SEC. 29' T'.27N., RA W.M. 1.57
2 M21 I . ef 00
0 vow
WWII
"K
f1022 Von
5 7 '1 D.z,',v
A V*34
"We
10
0
'elf
alloy &III*
too,.
Ic ADIS i
WMACL
It
K 2 C gill/
fill 59 N 44. K
21105 am
ej
A
4m $T &^TC . W1. 212"w ST
a 00 1 title
0 la, ! a ry
W1 7507 C!� Q q; N 2M20
wj SL 204
A a 1 0
zmS Lr F*A 4AO a
7303
SAa
0� � 0
21311
21117 21316 ICE
p- PARV i ROG 2/310
213LT I T-1 Q L-OT 2 IK"o
is zags j .,
2146S Ai mrzi3z4
4,
Srow HE
f4avot v7
Xon
it x Al' IM, V420
1401
2j5 ST Sw 21+00
INMAOMTOO
21420
r, 2142T
21491 21429
141
21F21
0 Sw
M521 21SOO
6
1527 AV
1116
A
k4w Sr
xaga 216"
jOO
21605 zt600
Aff
21
217
A
LI
Ala 6 560 7—o-W17 1-10645e '0
IVew X'r7)oe1v';qu5 cerep ;'�"hc"rory 7o 7-re.07C-1,7 ="O.ji/
3. 0
a5 r-es7—Re5j,1 r:5)
ZZ - U6e des,* 7 1�7 M47/.11-1
C7
U Se 12 IM 0 0 0
6Z �3
I oto r" 12 Peale ---lo ('J.7 0. 0 q C.<S co /if
X, 4
U;5e 415 /-o X14 wide dOelo
Z/9'
Ole
4.
t(Ak'1W
e4'.. I
If ()-I, c tt
AM.
Ole
-ilg""
9/7/00
001
op's
Ahmadnia Building
Storm Drainage Report
2140573 rd Place West
Edmonds, WA
Portion of NWI/4, NW1/4, Section 2, Township 27 N. Range
4 East WM Snohomish County WA
REc:s�VED
MAR 2 2 2331
DEVELOPVI��'�! r,�-Rk'3CES CTR.
c�TY OF EZ-1JODS
iq/o(
L:�--ExpjRES
Table of Contents
1. Introduction/General Information
2. Existing Site Hydrology/Upstream, Downstream Consideration
3. Proposed Site Hydrology
4. Storm Draining Calculator and Supporting Document
0 0
1. Introduction/General Information
The proposed project is located on lot 5, Luschen Tracts, Division No. 3, as per plat
recorded in volume 17 of plats, page 87, records of Snohomish County, WA. The site
address is 21405 73 rd place west Edmonds, WA. Existing site is approximately 11,520
SF. in area and contains an existing house located on west portion of site along 73 pl.
west. The project site is bounded to north, south, and east by existing lots and structures
... and to the west by 73 d place west.
Topography of site is sloping from.west to east with approximate relief of 8 Ft. Existing
on site soil consists of gravely sandy loom and designated as hydraulic group c based on
Snohomish County soil survey.
The proposed project is to construct approximately 2,270 SF. of new building along with
parking and drive areas. It is also required to modify the existing residential structure to
provide fire access to project.
i
2. Existing Site Hydrology/Upstream, Downstream
Consideration
Existing site consist of and 11,5 10 SF. of a parcel with and existing house along with it's
paved driveway to 73rd place west. Site slopes from west to east with and an average
slope of 6%. Existing ston-n run off sheet flows from west to east and percolate to ground
along low portion of site along eastproperty line. There is no storm drainage conveyance
downstream from site. An existing apartment complex is located to the East Side of
project with no storm run-off conveyance to this parcel.
There are no upstream drainage run-offs to this project site from adjacent properties.
Upstream drainage basin for this project is from areas to west of 73 rd place west and
215th. SW. Storm drainage run-off from upstream areas is tight lined along 73 d place
west and bypasses the project site and drains toward south. Storm drainage run-off from
73 rd place west and upstream tributary area is tight lined and drains toward 216t, St. SW.
From here storm drainage system travels northerly along 216th St. SW and discharges to
Haliscreek. Due to the fact tat this project does not proposes to discharge any run-off to
this system, there will be no adverse impact to downstream conveyance system.
3. Proposed Site Hydrology
Storm drainage conveyance and discharge system for this project is designed in the same
manner to existing conditions. C & H Design performed a percolation test based on King
County surface water design manual and the result is included within this report. The
average measured percolation rate has been used with a factor of safety of 2 to size the
infiltration system. The storm drainage infiltration system is designed for 100yr/24hr
design using SBUH methodology and storm water management manual guide line. Please
prefer to the enclosed calculation.
0
4. Storm Drainage Calculation and Supporting Documents
.2/4/00- 4:5:12 pm Shareware Release page
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: Al NAME: 100YR/24HR POST-DEV.
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.14 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPE1A PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION .... : 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.00 Acres 0.14 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 0.00 98.00
TC .... : 0.00 min 6.30 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.09 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
2/4/00 4:5:13 pm Shareware Release page 2
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1 0.021
340
1407 cf
0.14
2/4/'Ob 4:5:14 pm Shareware Release page 3
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST
STORAGE LIST ID No. 1
Description: 45X4X4 FEET TRENCH
2/4/00 4:5:15 pm Shareware Release page 4
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. 1
Description: 45X4X4 FEET TRENCH
STAGE <
---- STORAGE ---- >
STAGE <
---- STORAGE ---- >
STAGE <
---- STORAGE ---- >
STAGE <
---- STORAGE ---- >
(ft) ---
..... --�=
Cf---
.....
--AC-Ft-
= ... =---
(ft) --- Cf ---
....
-- AC -Ft-
(ft) ---Cf---
--AC-Ft-
(ft) ---
Cf---
--AC-Ft-
84.00
0.0000
0.0000
85.30
78-000
0.0018
.... ====
86.60
..........
156.00
=--=
0.0036
.... - ....
67.90
=.== .....
234.00
= ......
0.0054
84.10
6.0000
0.0001
85.40
84.000
0.0019
86.70
162.00
0.0037
88.00
240.00
0.0055
84.20
12.000
0.0003
85.50
90-000
0.0021
86.80
168.00
0.0039
88.10
246.00
0.0056
84.30
18.000
0.0004
85.60
96.000
0.0022
86.90
17 4.00
0.0040
88.20
252.00
0.0058
84.40
24.000
0.0006
85.70
102.00
0.0023
87.00
180. 00
0.0041
88.30
258.00
0.0059
84.50
30.000
0.0007
85.80
108-00
0.0025
87.10
186.00
.0.0043
88.40
264.00
0.0061
84.60
36.000
0.0008
85.90
114.00
0.0026
87.20
192.00
0.0044
88.50
270.00
6.0062
84.70
42.000
0.0010
86.00
120.00
0.0028
87.30
198.00
0.0045
88.60
276.00
0.0063
84.80
48.000
0.0011
86.10
126.00
0.0029
87.40
204.00
0.0047
88.70
282.00
0.0065
84.90
54.000
0.0012
86.20
132.00
0.0030
87.50
210.00
0.0048
88.80
288.00
0.0066
85.00
60.000
0.0014
86.30
138.00
0.0032
87.60
216.00
0.0050
88.90
294.00
0.0067
85.10
66.000
0.0015
86.40
144.00
0.0033
87.70
222.00
0.0051
89.00
300.00
0.0069
85.20
72.000
0.0017
86.50
150.00
0.0034
87.80
228.00
0.0052
89.00
300.00
0.0069
vu
2/4/00 4:5:16 pm Shareware Release page 5
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST
DISCHARGE LIST ID No. 1
Description: INFILTRATION
�/4/00 4:5:17 pm Shareware Release page 6
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
DISCHARGE LIST ID No.. 1
Description: INFILTRATION
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE ---
> STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
(ft)
--- CfS --
------- (ft)
--- cfs --
-------
(ft)
--- cfe -- -------
(ft)
--- CfS -- -------
............
84.00
0.0210
=-.-;; ----
.30
= -------
0.0210
--------------------
86.60
0.0210
--------
87.90
=== --- = --- ==== -----
0.0210
84.10
0.0210
85.40
0.0210
86.70
0.0210
88.00
0.0210
84.20
0.0210
85.50
0.0210
86.80
0.0210
88.10
0.0210
84.30
0.0210
85.60
0.0210
86.96
0.0210
88.20
0.0210
84.40
0.0210
85.70
0.0210
87.00
0.0210
88.30
0.0210
84.50
0.0210
85.80
0.0210
87.10
0.0210
.88.40
0.0210
84.60
0.0210
85.90
0.0210
87.20
0.0210
88.50
0.0210
84.70
0.0210
86.00
0.0210
87.30
0.0210
88.60
0.0210
84.80
0.0210
86.10
0.0210
87.40
0.0210
88.70
0.0210
84.90
0.0210
86.20,
0.0210
87.50
0.0210
88.80
0.0210
85.00
0.0210
86.30
0.0210
87.60
0.0210
88.90
0.0210
85.10
0.0210
86.40
0.0210
87.70
0.0210
89.00
0.0210
85.20
0.0210
86.50
0.0210
87.80
0.0210
89.00
0.0210
2'/4/b6 .4:5:21 pm Shareware Release page 7
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
,LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- c-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE
< -------- DESCRIPTION� -------- > (Cfs) (CfS) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id (CfS) VOL (Cf)
...... = ... = ........... == ....... = ............... — ........ = ............. — .... =..=.
100YR/24HR ROUTING ........... 0.00 0.09 1 1 88.09 1 0.02 245.25 cf
ILI
PrG
KING. COUNTY, WASONGTON, SURFACE WATLODESIGN MANUAL
FIGURE 4SIB ROOF DOWNSPOUT INFILTRA17ION SYMM
PLAN VIEW
NO SCALE
OBSERVATION PIPE 4" RIGID OR'lr FLEXIBLE
- - - - - - - - - - - PERFORATED PIPE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ROOF
DRAIN
SUMP
INFILTRnON TRENCH W/SOLID LID
PROFILE VIEW
NO SCALE
OVEF
OBSERVATI . ON PIPE-\ RIGID OR Gr FLEXIBLE SPLASH 8
/ PERFORATED PIPE
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
t/
K� 1: MIN 5.0' MIN
.0
WASHED ROC.
I 91-N
FIN'E
MESH CB MP W/
SCREEN SOAULID
-VARIES -10' MIN-J
OBSERVATION PIPE
4-tr WC-PERF PIPE
COMPACT BACKFILL
4C RIGID OR Ir FLEXIBLE
I;. J-�=PERFORATED PIPE
24'--J
SECTION A
NO SCALE
WASHED ROCK
I ll:r-31,C
WRAP GRAVEL ENTIRELY
WITH FILTER FABRIC
4.5.1-5 11/94
Proj
Tax account I
OW C9 (4� -
�-T
'13k. -::::- -, �
11
-315--76
ve 0- t-7�
5 la 4 t-3
SOIL F'R'OFI LE
3 tzX,
2.
3. 0 -5-6 " .6 L4 - 4 77
4.
5.
I
35-73 - 7'3 ? 7
0
T-�Jt
t.
A)oy4k'
3til 14�
�U
Q�
W
Ew—fl
F
"AC
wze-1
*4t:*40—
r4r,,,
p
Qj
R
a
EV OW
JAZ VIM
F —aEe R1
V) SM !9 ;0
ow
C14 m4t
vi
'Z�
MW
Me
F;
exz
14;
04
ko,
Wz--*&
NU WARRANTY OF ACCURACY. The information shown on th��
at( hed map was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its employee:-,
8 tconsultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy oj
anything set forth on the map. Any Person of entity requesting a coot, ~tkn J0 86-t yj
should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information showr'. '01'.
tne map, including but not limited to, the location of any sewer
Q-1"lown. Such sewer'stubs may Or may not exist and may or may nci
the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds not its —'200
Uf�:',QrS Shiall hij liah'Q fq� 111MV111141LIU11 Ylven of) this mall, fluf lut ��i%
"fovided hal:ed !:Q(M SPA rnnn
VON
soll 'Alkv,
LYNj4WOOD
32
20
1� All.
tot 7M
-39
78
28
04 -0
5
5
QN;
lTakACF
34 ...-
4�4 il
78
2
i� Tlk
A a JAI
4-N, 4
VA
RN
7
Soil survey
TABLE 15.--WATER FEATURES --Continued
High water
table
3logicl
1
1
.3u P Frequency 1 Duration
1 Months
1
Depth
1 Kind
I Months
lRare ------------ 1
I
1
Ft
2.0-4.0
lApparent
1 Nov -Apr
3 'Rare ------------ 1
>6.0
:Rare ------------
1
2.0-3.0
lApparent
Nov-Apr,�'
lNone ------------ 1
I
I Is
1
1.5-3.0
I'Perched
I Nov_M4'_
lNone ------------ 1
1
1.5-3.0
lPerched
I Nov -ma
lHone ----------- I
I
>6.o
1
17
lNone� ------------ 1
1
1.5-3.0
lPerched
Nov.4
lRone ------------- 1
1
>6.o
lNone------; ------ 1
1.0-3.0
lPerched
lio-
O'No'ne
----- ------ I
I
>6.o
Snohomish County Area, Washington
TABLE 16—SOIL FEATURES
[The symbol > means more than. Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern3
Soil name a?d
map symbo
1E
Lemented I
:12, E 111:!t!ice__T________r
D th pan I ____ __ *_�� a 1 R13 �EC 0 r r 0 �si 0 n
ep Hardness 1, Potential, -
I i 'Initial: Tot', 11
�i �IDepth 'Hardnp-q-Q frost !Uncoatpd
3 ----------------- It
>60
I An
61
Alderwood
20-40 1Thi
40:
Alderwood -------------- i
>60
20-40 IThii
Everett ----------------
>60
5*,
Alderwood --------------
>60
I
1 20-40 'Thin
Urban land. I
I
I
7 -----------------------
Bellingham 1
I
I
>60
-----------------------
>60
Bellingham Variant
9 10, 11 -------
a ----
C theart
>60
120.
S
Cryohemists
3 ----------------------
C t 1
3 er
>60
. C.,
A4 ---------------- ;
--------
-"'.Elwell I
I
>6o
20-40 IThin
I
I
I
""Elwell --------------- I
I
.., . --I
I
>6o
1 26-'40 IThin
lomount_�--� ------------
I
I
1 20-40 lHard
I
---------------
,;Iwell
1
I
>60 1
20-40- IThin
,_19mount ---------------
I
1 1 20-40 lHaed
1GGk outcrop.
18, 19-------------- 1
>60
I-. Iverett
1
FlUvaquents
-------------
0 chell ------- 1 >60 1
20-40 'Thin
ILow -------- Moderate !Moderate.
f I
I I
I
--- ILow ------ Noderate
!Moderate.
--- JLow____
--!Moderate IModerate.
[Low ------ Noderate Noderate.
--- Mow ------ !High ----- lHoderate.
1 11
Migh ----- IHigh-----IHlgh.
I
I
I
'Low ------ [High ----- lHoderate.
Mow ------ Noderate lHigh.
I.
I I
I I I
lH1gh-___lH1gh-____lH1gh.
--- iHigh-____lHigh--___lHigh.
I
I
I
--- lModerate lH1gh--___lH1gh.
I I
I
I I I
lHigh ----- 'High� ---- lHigh.
f I I . I
[Moderate 1HIgh ----- lHigh.
lLow ------ lModerate IModerate.
Nigh ----- !High ----- Migh.
I
son
TABLE 15.--WATER FEATURES-��ontinued
00 n
Irologief High -water tab
troup Frequency Duration I Months I Dapth,.. .1 Kind'.." Mont
�A
c
1 1.5-3-0: IPerched;.
-A I None -- — -------- I
1 >6.0
'C' I None—"--.,
1 .1 .5-3.5-,IPerched
C"-
I I 5�4 G'A Peiched-,'-
,A
�X -'77
C- i
.0.
"I.: 1.5m-2.5�A?erched
p'k
>6.0
-+1-0.5:IP'
f -77
-erched
4,
v. :JAPparent:*�,��,,,,:j
7V
A
V
-0
.0
+1-1.0 JApparent A
1, +1_1 .0� JApparent -
Snohomish COUntY Area. Washington
TABLE,I'5':.-`-VATE!R FEATURES-m-Contlnu
ed.�
'r-Looging
�§olf'name'_and 1w y a. rolo + g161
:High water table
-V
map symbol group I -Frequency_�A_. Duration I Months I :Depth.- I KI ad. I Months
430:
i Ft
Olomount c
I 1.5-3-5.lPerched I Nov -may
Elwell--"--. -C
INone ----- — --
4 Parched: 1. Xoi�-Jun
Rook oute-rop.
D
Greas
INone
nt
PPare LRdii-Mar
C
P :030
INone --------
-3.0' -may
Peebbed Nov
469-
A-,
c
C"
-De ' c-May
Rock - ou tcrop-.
A
4 7; 48, �49 -
Pastlk'-�
A Nonem
:,A
�J-.S'��.5. Peiched.,
'Pilchuck;.+
fFrequent' JUing
-4o"A ri 1 0�
p Apparent-:__�"_J_ %Novj!�Apr..
Pits
-C
A None"�-er
-ched': ov may�-
Pofchu&�"��
artni .C.
c
T'--5 -3.'0" Feridhed�'-'
ortn
.1,.5-3 Perc
.c
eqc*ikc rop
uget
O�4. 0 IAOp;ar 6nt I -'Ndv-Apr
--- — ------------ 1� B
Ikire
uyallup.,
I >6.o
58---;--� ------------ .,A
agnar
fxone� ------------ "I
1 >6.,o
t
"t VkH
'4, 1 nt
r
W, t ,k,
W
z
R77
�;.z u n
mg
RNi
RD, No . .........
CAI
- Win �pklicATION
............
SEWER FERMT EASEMENT No.
SIME
s IN AIRS 0
0U!j, IDE [I SIDE [I JtEF
NO
PERMYT I
R
CONTRACTO
.......................
............
'T 13LOCK No . ......................... .....................
ST ....................
.......... .. .....................
AVENUE LADT No. .... ....
.............. ...
. .......... ...............
........... ........... . .... .
........ bf�
. .........................
-:-HOUSt'l D.
. - . , 4,11— NAME AD ....... 't-
tr-.77 3-4
X
k- T_ — , ,
o 1 '77 a
;3
STOW ADDRESS FILE"'
ME
APPROVED
4_6 uG 24 1964
U G 11
. .............. ............
01,
A
pproved:
Date
�'DEPOSIT, $ ............ ........ ................... ..
.J:4, .................... . ............. .
m pt
ow
Rld
Z71
APPLICA [ON CARD No.
........................... ........
lor
E SEIVER PERNUT
n SIOD
EASEMENT No . ...................................... .-4,
OUTSTDE D INSIDE Ej REPAIRS 0
4
No
R ..... ......
............ CONTRACTO
...... ... - — ---------------------
'TREET
BWCKNo . ...............................................
'LVENUE LOT No . ............................................................ .........
-ic ......... K— �f/'
p
f" -i�' No.. ................
o�",hg NAME ADD . ............................... —'t ............................................................................................ ..........................
;' � tl
�kz� I f,Ve
e v.
Al
STREET ADDRESS FILE
Date Approved:
ACKF........................
iij, WO�k Ond ISSUE][ ....... ..... DEPOSIT, $ ..............
NYPRK 01��,RJSSUED .............
7-
pow''
lip
z
z
0
6 -
z
z
z
(L
0
Z
U:
0 0
Z
0 >
U U2 '� Z
0
tN
M
c
LU
0
nq
>;
z
NOTICE- NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY
The. jnf0rm,,t!vl '7�',vn c.1 the
Fl,"P wa�: ccf"446 fc;- Me by thc'.' City of Edmc--:
Th3 CitY of Edmonds does
c's
not wzrm:�,� of
forth or, the map, Any person or entity
F-9 i[ldcpendent Inquiry regarding the inf
c.-;y
bw not limited to, the I o c a t i
S� ' o n o
tuil3maYormaynotodstandma
c
rrr--.yr:tc,
Nciftiller the City of Edmonds n
cl�'a�l bu liablj fol the information
Et
or
giv" 1w
rcP,rzsell �akfj Provided based upon sald w
I nor for any ord
cn
0
r
oL =7
A? P'i
0
60�
Vl
0
A4
U2
M
Ul
0
0
0
0
U2
CITY OF EDMONDS Call pRospect 6-1107 when work
CIVIC CENTER —WATEWSEWER DEPARTMENT is ready for Inspection. (No WPM-
tio. Saturday, Sunday or holidays.) N2 1159
WE SEWER PERMIT
851 - 27th P1 ................................ ......................................... ..................... ............
ADDR&S --------- ------------ --------------------------------- i�kqe South
. ................... -- .......
CONTRACTOR..N.orth-End .. 5.ePtic ... TAIXk .. CO-$ -----------
OWAUNER ........ RQb-er.t.-1----H11,&'ff-S ---------------------------- --- ------ --
407-1 24 ........... 19-.6.4-, for ---------------------- days, to REPAIR or CONNECT a side Sewer
PeANIZon is granted --- - --- AU9USt ----- rdinances.
10 Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing o
W1114i'llity
APONTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
obtain a permit to construct sewer inside Property line. A licensed Side sewer contract r must
NOTE No. I —The owners of the property may street area- Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.
be employed to construct side sewer in
NOTE No. L 2--Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when You get Permit
NOTA No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside Property line; minimum grade of 2%.
No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must he water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
k than is provided for In the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or Its aP
NOTE No. 5--It is unlawful to alter or do any other wor
purtenances except to insert the pipe into the wye.
0
Io C. 1 S) 11
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
September 1, 2004
Mr. Hossein Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W, Non -Compliant Parking Space
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
swc)'6
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
This is in response to your letter dated August 27, 2004. On August 11, 2004, 1
personally observed the vehicle parking in the asphalt area in the front of your property at
2150773 d Place West while I happened to be passing through your neighborhood for
another purpose. Not only did I observe the parked vehicle, but I also observed that the
approved 6 foot wide asphalt walkway had been widened to well over the approved 6
foot width by removing some of the landscaping, relocating the concrete blocks, and
exposing additional asphalt. As a result, my letter dated August 12, 2004 directed you to
correct the situation.
Your letter indicates that, as of August 27, 2004, the asphalt had. been removed.
However, at that time, the extent of the asphalt removed was insufficient, the remaining
asphalt was still in excess of 8 feet wide, and the concrete blocks needed to be relocated
after completion of the additional asphalt removal. Lyle Chrisman and I both spoke to
Mr. Hauck on August 27 and explained the additional asphalt removal required and the
extent to which the blocks needed to be relocated.
The voice mail that you left for me on August 27, 2004 did not leave a phone number. I
tried to call you on the phone number we had on file, but it appeared to be a fax number.
So, I sent the enclosed e-mail to respond to your voice mail.
On Monday morning, August 30, 2004,. Lyle and I inspected the walkway and determined
that additional asphalt had been removed over the weekend, and that the extent of asphalt
removal and relocation of concrete blocks was acceptable. The enclosed photographs
indicate the approved width of walkway asphalt and location of concrete blocks. As
indicated in these photographs, which were taken on September 1, 2004, the restoration
of landscaping remains to be completed. However, since the asphalt width has been
reduced to the approved 6 foot width and the concrete blocks have been relocated, we do
not intend to pursue enforcement action, civil fines or penalties at this time.
Incorporated August 11, 1890
T T I -
If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman or me at 425 7710220.
Sincerely,
D K GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
Mike Thies, Code Enforcement
Gebert, David
From: Gebert, David
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:12 PM
To: I ahmadnia@yahoo.com'
Cc: Chrisman, Lyie
Subject: Walkway/parking at 21507 73rd PL W
Mr. Ahmadnia,
I received your voice mail today, but you did not leave me a phone number for me to return your call.
I was with Lyle this morning when he inspected the walkway in front of your property at 21507 73rd PI W. Although some
of the asphalt walkway has been removed, not enough has been removed to comply with our directions.
Please refer to my letter dated August 12, 2004, which states that..."you must physically remove any asphalt that exceeds
the approved 6 foot walkway width and restore the concrete blocks and landscaping to a permanent configuration that
precludes the area from being easily changed back again to a parking space. In addition, ....the concrete blocks lining the
6 foot walkway must be outside the City right-of-way."
During our inspection this morning, we observed that the width of the asphalt is still in excess of 8 feet wide. It must be no
wider that 6 feet wide. Any asphalt that exceeds 6 feet in width must be removed.
Dave Gebert
City Engineer
CA
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: ww,�tb.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
467 Planning - Building - Engineering
August 12, 2004
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115 '
RE: Property at 2i�07_73'd_ P - lace W, Tqon-Compliant Parking Space.
kc-
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
On August 11, 2004, we observed a vehicle parked in a non -compliant parking space on
your property at 21507 73rd Place West in Edmonds. Please see the enclosed photograph.
On March 3, 2003, you were issued a correction notice for your development project at
this location pertaining to the asphalt area in the front yard that, if left in its configuration
at that time, could have been used as a non -compliant parking space. The correction
notice required that you submit a revised plan requesting City approval for a walkway
extension from the previously existing sidewalk or remove the asphalt area in the front
yard that could be used as a non -compliant parking space, and restore landscaping per the
approved plans.
On March 7, 2003 we received a revised plan from you showing a 6 foot wide asphalt
walkway extending from your previously existing concrete sidewalk to the new asphalt
driveway on the south side of your property. My letter to you dated March 12, 2003
advised you that, although the configuration of the proposed asphalt walkway was
acceptable, we could not approve it because you had not addressed the City's concern
identified to you in previgus correspondence, specifically:
".'..the City's concern is that this not be later converted back to a paved area that
could be used for parking because it does not meet City standards and would not
be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised plan must include
permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will preclude it from
being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to park a vehicle. In other
words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example, the
landscapi ng cannot simply be removed again to restore the 'parking space'."
Your letter dated March 18, 2004 stated that "...the area in question was never intended
to be a parking stall and was never used for parking." You further stated that the City
"...can continue to monitor for changes and issue a violation if we make any changes. .
Incorporated August 11, 1890
.qiqfor r.ifii - t4olzinAn JAnAn
The changes that I had made cannot easily be undone and you have my assurance that no
changes will be made following your approval of current plan."
Based upon your written assurances that no changes would be made from the'revised plan
submitted with your letter of March 7, 2003 subsequent to our approval, and that your
proposed plan would be'pennanent, my letter dated March 25, 2003 approved your
proposed 6 foot wide asphalt walkway, lined with concrete block units and extending
from your previously existing concrete sidewalk to the new asphalt driveway on the south
side of your property.
Unfortunately, as noted above, we have now observed that your approved plan has indeed
been changed and the asphalt area in question is now, in fact, being used for a parking
space. This parking space does not meet City standards and is not safe for parking a
vehicle. Accordingly, we have no choice but to direct you to restore this area to the 6
foot Wide walkway as approved by my letter,dated March 25, 2003. In restoring the area
to the approved walkway configuration, you must physically remove any asphalt that
exceeds the approved 6 foot walkway width and restore the concrete blocks and
landscaping to a permanent configuration that precludes this area from being easily
changed back again to a parking space. In addition, I must remind you that the concrete
blocks lining the 6 foot walkway must be outside the City right-of-way.
You must complete the work to restore this area to the approved 6 foot wide Walkway
configuration by Friday, August 27, 2004. If you do not complete the directed restoration
by that date, the City will pursue enforcement action, which may include but not be
limited to civil fines and penalties.
If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman or me at 425 7710220.
Sincerely,
DAVID K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
Mike Thies, Code Enforcement
'177
Air
>7
- �Jdloo^
-,PC. i S9,3
AD
CITY OF EPMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
I Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 17, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
The City of Edmonds, Engineering Division, has been advised by our Public Works
Department that a water valve installed with the development of this property was buried
in the sidewalk. The water valve was installed by the City of Edmonds at the time
individual water services were provided to the lot. The sidewalk was subsequently
constructed over the water valve by your development project. The water valve must be
accessible and operational at all times.
The City is requesting that you expose the water valve and raise it to the grade of the
sidewalk. You will be required to remove the panel of sidewalk in which the water valve
falls and then re -pour the concrete Sidewalk panel once complete. The City of Edmonds
Public Works Department has marked the approximate location of this valve in blue spray
paint on the sidewalk.
Please bring the water valve to grade or provide the City with a reasonable timeframe in
which the work has been scheduled to be complete, by December 18, 2003. If the work is
not complete as specified, the Public Works Department will be forced to perforrn the
work and you will be billed accordingly for time and materials, or the City will attach your
bond. I
Your cooperation in bringing the water valve to grade so it is accessible is appreciated.
Please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220, ext 1328 with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
N
Jeanie McConnell
Engineering Technician
jrn
c: ott Highland
treet file
1/1!c
Incorporated August 11, 1890
14 C. 18,9 ",
\--G
M
CITY OF EDMONDS
Ai 17
GAPY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwici.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
March 25, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
We have received your letter dated March 18, 2003.
First, let me clarify that, during our meeting on February 26, 2003, 1 did not agree that the paved
area did not have to be removed. What we did agree was that you would submit revised plans
requesting City approval of a sidewalk extension in this location.
I also advised you that your revised plan must include permanent changes to the existing asphalt
and features that will preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to
park a vehicle; in other words, that prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example,
the landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the "parking space".
We do not agree that your revised plan meets these criteria. Although the concrete blocks which
you have placed on top of the asphalt pavement to delineate a walkway may be heavy, they can
still be removed without difficulty to once again expose the paved area that is now covered by the
blocks and landscaping bark.
However, based upon your written assurances that no changes will be made from the revised plan
submitted with your letter of March 7, 2003 subsequent to our approval, and that your proposed
plan will be permanent, your proposed 6 foot wide asphalt walkway, lined with concrete block
units and extending from your previously existing concrete sidewalk to the new asphalt driveway
on the south side of your property, is approved.
DA-WD K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Date: March 18, 2003
From: Nasser Ahmadnia
To: David Gebe rt
City of Edmonds
121 5' Ave North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Cc: Development Services Department
Permit Coordinator
1215' Ave North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: 21505 73rd P1. W, Edmonds
Dear Mr. Gebert:
4/1
A%P? C-I'646
4?99J
This is a reply to your letter dated March 12, 2003. 1 am currently out of United States and will return
on April 28, 2003. 1 am sending you this response via email and will also send it to my nephew and
ask him to mail you a copy of this letter via register mail.
On March 7, 1 delivered a letter along with a revised plan for the area in question. As we had agreed in
our meeting the wall along the sidewalk was removed. You had agreed that the paved area did not
have to be removed as we stressed the need to have a paved access to the existing walkway to the
house. The plan I submitted, and the modification to the area, shows a paved pathway lined with over
40 stoned blocks (50 lb each) that is six feet wide and twelve feet long. The existing pathway is not
big enough for parking stall. In my plan, I forgot to highlight the length of the pathway. I stress again,
the area in question was never intended to be a parking stall and was never used for parking. The
length of the pathway (12 feet) prohibits it to be use as a parking stall. Also, the changes that I made
will make it very difficult for anyone to park there. You can continue to monitor for changes and issue
a violation if we make any changes. Other than that, I am not sure that I can offer to do. The changes
that I had made cannot easily be undone and you have my assurance that no changes will be made
following your approval of current plan. Given the level of difficulty with this project, I feel that'some
good faith on your part is prudent
Since I am currently out of state, please forward your reply via email to the following email area:
. If any action is required, please keep in mind that I will not be back in United alunadnia0).vahoo.com
States until April 28, 2003.
Sincerely yours,
Nasser Ahmadma.
Page 1,of 2
Graf, Jeannine
From: Gebert, David
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Bowman, Duane; Bullock, Steve; Graf, Jeannine; Chrisman, Lyle; Gilbert, Danielle
Subject: FW: Order to Correct Violation
Attached, for info, is the Nasser Ahmadnia letter to which my draft responds.
Have a great weekend.
Dave
----- Original Message�----
From: Nasser Ahmadnia (mailto:ahmadnia@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:52 AM
To: Gebert, David
Subject: Re: Order to Correct Violation
Mr. Gebert,
I am currently out of United States and will return on April 28, 2003. 1 have attached a lette . r to' this
email as a reply to your letter on March 12. -Please acknowledge receipt of this email via areply.
Sincerely,
Nasser Ahmadnia
"Gebert, David" <Geber1@cLedmonds.waus> wrote:
Mr. Ahmadnia,
You will be receiving in the mail an Order to Correct Violation (OTC) dated March 10, 2003. Please
disregard it. It was issued in error and has been cancelled.
The Building Official issued the OTC because we were not aware at the time that you had submitted a
revised plan. When you brought in your revised plans on Friday March 7, 2003, you gave it to the
receptionist and did not indicate that it was a revised submittal. Therefore, it was not submitted to the
Permit Coordinators who are responsible for tracking all permit actions. Thus, neither the Building
Official nor I were aware that you had submitted your revised plans until after the OTC was issued. We
apologize for any confusion.
We will review your revised plan and'provide you a response.
Dave Gebert
City Engineer
City of Edmonds
Do you Yahoo!?
3/21/2003
100.
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH , EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
March 12,2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna.Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73"d Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
We have received your letter dated February 7, 2003. We believe you intended to date
your letter March 7, 2003, because it was received in our Development Services
Department on March 7, 2003 and in our Engineering Division on March 10, 2003., The'
following is our response to the three specific numbered items in your letter:
1. My letter of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. In that letter I advised you
of the action I intend to take. I have no further response.
2. My letter -of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. I have not further
response.
3. We have reviewed the revised plan submitted with your letter for a 6 foot wide
asphalt walkway extending from your existing concrete sidewalk to the new
asphalt driveway on the south side of your property. The configuration of the
proposed asphalt walkway is acceptable. However, we cannot yet approve it
because your submittal does -not address the City's concern identified in my letter
to you of February 27, 2003. Specifically, my letter stated that:
"...the City's concern is that this not be later converted back to a paved area
that could be used for parking because it does not meet City standards and
would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised plan must
include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to
park a vehicle. In other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that,
for example, the landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the
'parking space'."
Please submit, by * explanation of how your revised
plan provides the C!tysuc#as"sur"anc1e's'&P
Incorporated August 11, 1*890
The deadline for completion of the actions required by the Correction Notice issued on
March 3, 2003, is hereby extended to March 21, 2003. Failure to respond by this date
may result in issuance of an Order to Correct Violation.
When you bring your submittal in to City Hall, please be sure to submit it to a
Development Services Department Permit Coordinator so that it will be properly received
and tracked for plan review.
Sincerely,
DAVID K GEBERT, PE
City -Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
0
NOTIC
TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER
DO NOT REMOVE
PARTIAL APPROVAL 0 CORRECTON REQUIRED ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION
Owner �su, A6M (A A 011 C^_ Permit Number
Job Address— Site Contact
WORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED
APPROVED PLANS AND JOB CARD MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE
CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE
OF WORK IS STARTED
RECALL FOR INSPECTION El $45 REINSPECTION FEE MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO INSPECTION REQUEST
STOP WORK -UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR
NO PERMIT -STOP WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK'COMPLY WITH
ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES
9v
THE ACTIONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO BE CORRECTED WMUN
3 CALENDAR DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220
13 Building El Planning Engineering El Fire El Public Works
1). rd I L 6GTj_ Inst)ector 1,0 2,
White: Permit File PinL- Enforcement I I Buff: Applicant
a,
.'-tic. i 819'J
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwxi.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
1��
February 27, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73d Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
Tliank you for meeting with Lyle Chrisman and me on February 26, 2003 to discuss the concerns
addressed in your letter of February 20, 2003. After discussing your concerns with you and your
brother, we summarized them into three primary issues, which I would like to address as follows:
1. You feel you were singled out and treated inapproRnately by City Engineering Division
staff during the plan review and inMection of your prgiect.
Your allegations thatIngineer Division staff singled you out and treated you in a
prejudicial and discriminatory manner are very serious allegations and are taken seriously
by the City. Please be assured that it is the City's policy to treat all developers in a
professional and consistent manner, as necessary to ensure compliance with applicable
codes and approved plans.
After reviewing your letter and your comments in our meeting, and looking into the
project history, I must take exception to your allegations. Although your project had
some site constraints that led to frustration for you in obtaining permit approvals, and
some inspections resulted in disapproval and re -inspection, I believe our staff acted in a
professional and consistent manner in our dealings with you.
Nonetheless, it is clear that you are quite passionate in your perception of your treatment
by Engineering Division staff. During our meeting, you agreed that there is nothing that
can be done to change any past actions. However, I assured you that I will counsel our
Engineering Division staff to make sure that we all have an appreciation for how our
actions and procedures may be perceived, and that we make sure that we deal with.all
developers in a professional, consistent, and respectful manner.
2. You believe. that the Edmonds Community Develgpment Code (ECDC) needs to be
revised so it can be uniformly and consistently applied.
We agree. It has been a number of years since the ECDC has had a major update, and
there are a number of areas where it could be clearer and easier to interpret. Tbe.
Development Services Director had planned to undertake the significant task of a major
Incorporated August 11, 1890
I - &
code update in 2003. Unfortunately, due to significant budget cuts this year, the City
Council was not able to approve the funding in the 2003 budget that the Development
Services Director requested to accomplish this task.
Therefore, the best we can do for the foreseeable future is to continue to address and
clarify individual issues on a case by case basis. If you can provide us specific
recommendations to improve specific sections of the ECDC, that would be helpful and
g . reatly appreciated.
3. You want C±tapproval. to not R Mace" that we have directed
ith landsca in er the at)Droytd plans.
As we discussed, there are actually two corrections directed by Mr. Chrisman's ett er of
January 24, 2003 that, as of our meeting, you had not completed. You were directed in
that letter to 1) remove the block wall from the City right of way, and 2) remove the
asphalt area in the front yard that could be used as a parking space and restore
landscaping per the approved plans.
During our meeting, you agreed to remove the block wall from the right of way.
Regarding the asphalt "parking space", you explained that you do not intend this to be a
parking space and that your intent is that it be a walkway extension from your previously
existing sidewalk.
As we agreed, you will . submit a revised plan requesting City approval for a sidewalk
extension in this location. I explained to -you that the City's concern is that this not be
later converted back to a paved area that I could be used for parking because it does not
meet City standards and would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised
plan must include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to park a vehicle.
In other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example, the
landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the "parking space".,
We are always working to improve our processes and procedures, and I thank you for providing
us your input.
DAVID K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Mayor Gary Haakenson
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
0
NOTIC
TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER
DO NOT REMOVE
Q PARTIAL APPROVAL Q CORRECTON REQUIRED
&ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION
Owner &1110%'t A1W&V11* Permit Number A101fle
Job Address— 7-3 —Site Contact
WORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED
L3 APPROVED PLANS AND JOB CARD MUST BE AVAILABLE, TO INSPECTOR ON SITE
Ll CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE
OF WORK IS STARTED
L3 RECALL FOR INSPECTION $45 REINSPECTION FEE MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO INSPECTION REQUEST
STOP WORK -UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR , I
NO PERMIT -STOP WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK'COMPLY WITH
ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES
a � 1111!11
,I i�
4,
MW, F&I MI.Vmmp
THE ACTIONS OR CORREMONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO BE CORRECTED WITHIN
/0 CALENDAR DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220
.0 , Building 13 Planning El Engineering 0 Fire 13 Public Works
White: Pvrmit File Pink: Enforcement Buff: Applicant
1112 C. 1 SW3
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 * FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
March 12, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
rd
RE: Property at,215077,L3 Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
We have received your letter dated February 7, 2003. We believe -you intended to date
your letter March 7, 2003, because it was received in our Development Services
Department on March 7, 2003 and in our Engineering Division on March 10, 2003. The
following is our response to the three, specific numbered items in your letter:
My letter of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. In that letter I advised you
of the action I intend to take. I have no further response.
2. My letter of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. I have not further
response.
3. We have reviewed the revised plan submitted with your letter for a 6 foot wide
asphalt walkway extending from your existing concrete sidewalk to the new
asphalt driveway on the south side of your property. The tonfiguration of the
proposed asphalt walkway is acceptable. However, we cannot yet approve it
because your submittal does not address the City's concern id entified in my letter
to you of February 27, 2003. Specifically, my letter stated that:
"...the City's concern is that this not be later converted back to a paved area
that could be used for parking because it does not meet City standards and
would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your. revised plan must
include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to
park a vehicle. In other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that,
for example, the landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the
'parking space'."
Please submit, by Friday, March 21, 2003, an explanation of how your revised
plan provides the City such assurances.
Incorporated AugUst 11, 1890
qic+or Cifil - 1-40trinAn TAn;%n
Z' ---
The deadline for completion of the actions required by the Correction Notice issued on
March 3, 2.003, is hereby extended to March 21, 2003. Failure to respond -by this date
may result in issuance of an Order to Correct Violation.
When you bring your submittal in to City Hall, please be sure to submit it to a
Development Services Department Permit Coordinator so that it will be properly received
and tracked for plan review.
Sincerel
DAVID IC GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
Date: Feb 20, 2003
To: Mayor Gary Haakenson
City of Edmonds
To:-,
City of Edmonds
Regarding: Property at 21507 73rd Pl. W
Edmonds, WA 98037
Dear Sirs,
FEB 2 1 2003
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
I am writing you regarding my latest issue with one of your inspectors and want to share
with you my very difficult experience with the Engineering Division and Engineering
Inspection department over the course of my construction project in Edmonds. I own and
have been involved in the construction of three town homes addition to my property at
21505 73' Pl. W.
I want to ask you a simple question? Would you as professional individual tolerate name
calling and insult by a city inspector? This is the experience that I had last Tuesday
morning (February 18 around 8:30am) with Ms. Danielle Gilbert (Engineering inspector)
who called me after -calling my brother to get my mobile number. During the call, Ms.
called me "stupid" -.and stated that "if you think that we are not watching you, you
-are being.stupid". the phone call, I visited the city of Edmonds, to inquiry
about her and find out -about her supervisor's name. On the same day, she had contacted
zz�, the planning department, a different department from where she works, and had them
it' --Ibpost a notice of enforcement violation on my property stating "landscaping removed to
Z "',p
4J accommodate additional parking space. Remove parking spaces and restore landscaping."
The space in question is not big enough to accommodate a car. Also, as.you can see from
the drawings the landscaping had to be changed to allow access to the existing sidewalk
to the house on the property. Without this access, you had to walk over the grass to get to lxd' A�-wwe_
the existing sidewalk which is not proper. i
My problems with Ms. Gilbert are not recent issue. From her first encounter toward me
and my project I can only conclude that she has prejudices toward me. It is my request to
you to have her stop harassing me and have her avoid making phone calls to me. I found
her phone call to me very upsetting and offending. And I found her comment "if you
��ao think that we are not watching you, you are being stupid" to imply that city of Edmonds
4;J Airrcp�) have too much resources and can spare inspectors to keep an eye just on us.
If you see my project, you would be proud to have this project in.such a location, where
on both north and south of my project there are very dense apartment buildings. I believe
we have build the only side walk on the street. If you continue on this sidewalk in front of
the house you'll immediately walk into the electrical post and wiring tensioners.
Here is some my past encounters with Ms. Gilbert which leads me to believe she has a
personal issue with me and my project.
k! "
I got a permit for my project issued by the City of Edmonds on July 13, 2000. At that
time, the city of Edmonds had told me that I would be able to renew my permit for
another year. One month prior to expiration of my permit, June 2001, 1 went to renew
my permit and at that time I was told that I have to complete at least one inspection
before I could renew my permit.
My first experience with Ms. Gilbert was when she came onto the job site with Mr.
Michael Snook (building inspector) for per -construction meeting. She made a comment
that the set of plans that I present her was not legitimate approved site plans and she had
to call to verify my original plans. She stated that her visit did not count as an inspection
and she refused to sign the inspection card. We continue to do site development. Next, we
installed 80 feet 8" side sewer with a manhole. Again, she came out and inspected the
work but refused to sign the inspection card. Then on 7/9/02, we installed detention
system and called for inspection again. This time we got lucky and got a different
inspector. That inspector came out inspected the detention system and we got the first
signature on our inspection card, what we needed to renew our permit. Again, on another
occasion 7/18/02, we called for inspection of water line from the street to the new
building site. This time neither I nor my contractor (John Spencer) were at the site,
however, my contractor's son was there. At that occasion Ms. Gilbert comes to the site
and notices that the contractor did not have copper wire around the water line and she
comments to my contractor's son, that she is very made at me and I (Nasser) should have
know better. Why does she exhibit such behavior? I ask you is this type of treatment that
people building in Edmonds should expect? I must tell you that I have heard in numerous
occasions that -builders avoid building in -Edmonds because of similar -treatments that I
have encountered.
In numerous occasions I had called for inspection and Ms. Gilbert had either not showed
up for inspection or failed.to re -schedule. Overall I had a total of 7 inspections required
by Engineering Department (Ms. Gilbert) and all of them were challenging and frankly
nightmarish. In contrast, I had, 16-17 building inspection done by the Building
Department by Mr. Michael Snook and all of these inspections were pleasant
experiences. In fact, Mr. Michael Snook encouraged my to build again in City of
Edmonds which I'll n ever do. Also, my Fire and Planning inspections were completed
very professionally.
My problems with the Engineering department goes back to Mr. Lyle Chrisman,
Development Services Engineer, reviewing of my project where he insisted on enforcing
an non -existing set back called "shy distance". It toke six months and may registered
letters to get a reply and finally Mr. Gerbert had to step in to resolve this matter.
I would like your office to look into this discriminatory behavior and reply within 7 days
to my letter since I only have 10 days to reply to the Notice I received from city of
Edmonds.
Regards,
Nasser Ahm AdmA
41�4 C. 1 S9\3
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 21,2002
A
H ossein Ahmadnia
122 NE i58th St
Seattle, Wa 98155
Re: Request for Address Change
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia;
GARY HAAKENSON
. I MAYOR
r
This letter is to inform you that your request for an address change has been .
granted. The old address Of 21405 73rd P1 W is nOW 21507 73 rd PlWand
2.1407 73rd P1 W is nOW 21505 73rd P1 W. This may seem confusing at first
but the numbers must get smaller as they go north SO 21507 must be south of
21505. 1 will inform all City Divisions including Fire, Police, Utility Billing, Public
Works and Building.
It is your responsibility to inform the Post Office, the Phone Company for
Enhanced 911 emergency purposes and all other interested parties of this
correction.
Si cerely,
c Y'
a Palma *er
Permit Coordinator
City of Edmonds
Cc: Fire Department
Police Department
Utility Billing
Public Works
Building Official/Street File
L\Teffjp\]DST's\Master Leuem\Address Change
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Nov 21 U2 Ul:UZJP virarge Ldgi6 uur-V.
k � C- � j I I
r. -
Nov 21, 2002
Fax: 425-771-0221
Attn: Lara Palmatier
11i Lara,
I am requesting a change to the following addresses:
Old Address New Address
21405 73'd pl W 21505 73rd PI W
21407 73d PI W' . 21507 73"d PI W
The current addresses do not correspond with the street crossing
Best Regards,
H AJ�madrd'
, ,. aLl
206-715-0747
BUILDING DEPT.
0
RETURN ADDRESS:
City of Edmonds,- City Clerk
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
CONFORMED COPY
200108070284
08/07/2001 12:42 PM Snohomish
P-0002 RECORDED County
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Reference #: -;�-o C) / __ 0 5�a
Grantor(s): (1 1 Additional on pg.
_4ADsse'y,\ Ahm
Grantee(s): - City of Edmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec_i-_,,L—Twn d-, -L-Rng
Qtr A/ k/
OR Lot ------Block --- Ylat
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) S) 0 Ij — L2,012 - 0 0 5 - (2)
-----Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned
WHEREAS, 17&5�-4_�rAJ
are the owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit:
Property Address: a�_ 117-31 P L.
Legal Description:- I�Z
Assessor's Tax Parcel ED # (s): (10 13 000 00'13_110_&�
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
C, of Edmonds
By:. Date
Page of J_,
WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive
covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code. WITNESSETH, that for and in
consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to
the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit:
That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the
Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing
may be erected on subject property containing more than — 2 . units.
Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and'
their heirs, successors and assigns.
DATED this C2 —day of�_,A CA_� 1-9��o
_,4�K
GRANTOR
GRANTOR
State of Washington
)ss
County of 4w::,)
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that AIL R+VtA1DJ4tA
signed this instrument, on oath stated . that he/she was authorized to execute the
instrument and acknowledged it as the ou_1710ZIA (title) of
(name of party on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be
the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentions in this
instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this of ZOL:f
M &
'90", 1 ,
............ LZ AJ
CJ 110 .0 Notary Pd%lic in and for theState of Washington.
Z AOTA
My commission expires ri-R-2,D3
CD PUBUG
-.V&,
ZV SZ
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDI14G
17, -',Cur
City of Edmonds
WAS
,"fill 1111000% By: Ze Date... MW
Page COZ of -*2-
LATEMMUILDINGWORMSMSTRICT
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF T14E CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE APWA
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP TWO SETS OF APPROVED PLANS ON SITE AT
ALL TIMES FOR RECORDING AS -BUILT INFORMATION; ONE SET SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., AT
COMPLETION OF CONSTRACTION.
PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK PERTAINING TO DRAINAGE, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL CONTACT THE EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION TO SET UP
SCHEDULING.
4. GRADING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY RIGHT- OF- WAY MUST COMPLY WITH
CHAPTER 70 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE.
5. ALL PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CLASS "B"BEDDING IN ACCORDANCE
WITH APWA STANDARDS.
6. BACKFILL TRENCH OF PIPES IN LIFTS OF 6 INCHES TO 8 INCHES AND COMPACT
TO 95 PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSITY (ASTM D- 1557) UNDER ROADWAYS AND 90
PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSITY (ASTM D-1557) OFF ROADWAYS.
7. ALL BUILDING DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED
TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
8. ALL STROM PIPE AND FITTINGS DESIGNATED AS PVC SHALL BE POLYVINYL
CHLORIDE (SDR-35) WITH RUBBER GASKETS CONFORMING TO ASTM D-3034-73.
9. INSTALL TEMPORARY CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAPS ON ALL EXISTION OR
NEW CATCH BASINS ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
10. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE TO TOP OF PAVEMENT
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
11. IF ANY UNKNOWN SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING
CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHALL IMMDIATELY BE BROUCHT TO THE ATTENTION
OF THE OWER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL
EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN IN USE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA
WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON T14E PLANS.
13. PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT
ADJACENT PROPERTIES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, AT ALL TIMES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INPORTING AND/OR
EXPORTING ALL MATERIAL AS REQUIRED TO PROPRLY CRADE THE SITE TO
THE FINISHED ELEVTIONS SHOWN HEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND THE SOILS ENGINEER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS.
MAR 2001
DE\fELOPMEW SERVICES CUTR-
CITy OF EM1011"S
0 0
15. THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO
THE APPROVED PLANS, WHICH ARE ON FILE WITH EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT
SERIVERS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE
WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE APPROPRIATE DIVISION.
16. ALL "ENGINEERED FILL" SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT MAXIMUM
DENSITY (ASTM D- 1557). ALL IMPORTED FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE BANK RUN
GRAVEL, CLASS "B." THE EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
SUCCESSIVE HORIZONTAL LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 8 INCHES IN LOOSE
THICKNESS WHICH INCLUDES FILL IN CULVERT AREAS.
17. THE FACES OF CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED
TO CONTROL AGAINST EROSION. THIS CONTROL MAY CONSIST OF EFFECTIVE
PLANTING. THE PROTECTION FOR THE SLOPES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SOON
AS PRACTICABLE. WHERE CUT SLOP ARE NOT SUBJECT TO EROSION DUE TO
THE EROSION -RESISTANT CHARACTER OF THE MATERIALS, SUCH
PROTECTION MAY BE OMITTED.
18. CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE SWALES TO DRAIN BACK, SIDES AND FRONTS OF ALL
BUILDINGS AS NECESSARY, 2.0 PERCENT MINIMUM SLOPE.
19. CONSTRUCTION OF DEWATERING (GROUNDWATER) SYSTEM SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE APWA STANDARD SPECIFCATION, SECTION 61-3.02.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE THAT ALL EXISTING STROM DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES RECEIVING RUNOFF FROM THE SITE HAVE NOT BEEN IMPACTED
BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
0 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODE
REQUIRMENTS IN PROVIDING EXTENSION TO PIPING, CONDUIT AND OTHER
UTILY ACTIVITIES.
2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR DETAILED INFORMATION AND DIMENSIONS RELATED TO
CURB RETURNS, PLANTER DIMENSIONS, SETBACKS, PAVEMENT EDGE
LOCATIONS, ETC.
3. FOR AID IN UTILITY LOCATION CALL 1-800-424-5555 PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION.
4. ALL CURBING TO BE 6 INCHES HIGH EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURBING PER
DETAIL AS NOTED ON PLAN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. CONFLICTS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF BARGHAUSEN
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. AND SHALL BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION.
6. UTILITY LINES MAY NOT BE COVERD UNTIL AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN TESTED
AND APPROVED. UPON COMPLETION OF THE BACDFILL OPERATIONS, THE
UTILITY LINES SHALL BE RETESTED.
7. ALL UTILITY LINE EXCAVATION BEDDING AND BACKFILL MATERIALS AND
COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS
ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND T14E GOVERNING AGENCY
REQUIREMENTS.UTILITY LINES S14ALL INCLUDE STORM DRAIN, WATER,
SEWER, ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, AND LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION LINES.
ALL SANITARY SEWER LINE SHALL BE PVC SDR 35 SEWER PIPE CONFORMING
TO ASTM D-303A-73. CALL THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT 425-771-0220, EXT
1326 FOR INSPECTION.
9. ALL WATER SERVICE SHALL BE COPPER TYPE K OR POLYETHYLENE PIPE.
POLYETHYLENE PIPE SIZE SHALL BE IRON PIPE SIZE ASTM-D2239-SIDR#7-
PE3406, AND SHALL BE MARKED AT INTERVALS NO GREATER THAN 5' WITH
THE MANUFACTURERS NAME, SIZE AND MINIMUM PSI RATING OF 160PSI. 12
GAUGE VINYL COATED WIRE SHALL BE CONTINUOUS, WRAPPED AROUND THE
METER AND AT THE HOUSE AND SHALL BE TAPED TO THE WATER PIPE EVERY
10'. CALL THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT 425-771-0220, EXT 1326 FOR
INSPECTION.
10. A TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL CONCRETE EDGES TO WHICH
ASPHALT IS TO BE PLACED.
ii. SOIL STERILIZATION (WEED KILLER) SHALL BE APPLIED IN AREAS TO BE
PAVED. KEEP 2 FEET (MIN) CLEAR OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
AREAS.APPLY AT MANUFCTURER'S RECOMMENDED RATE TO ASSURE PROPER
PENETRATION.
12. SURFACE SMOOTHNESS OF ASPHALT SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE IF
EXCEEDING 1/4 INCH USING A I 0-FOOT STRAIGHT EDGE. PONDING OR
0
"BIRDBATHS" EXCEEDING 1/41NCH IN DEPTH SHALL LNOT BE ACCEPTABLE
AND SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
13. ALL EXISTING UTILIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM A
FIELD SURVEY AND FROM AVAILABLE PUBLIC RECORDS. CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, WHICH MAY
CONFLICT WITH CONSTRUCTION WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, OR NOT.
ENGINEER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT ALL UTILITIES HAVE BEEN SHOWN.
14. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S REPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE TELEPHONE
COMPANY, THE GAS COMPANY,THE POWER COMPANY, AND THE CABLE TV
COMPANY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SO THAT THESE OTHER UTILITIES CAN
PREPARE THE NECESSARY PLANS FOR THE EXTENTION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE T14E CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO
COORDINATE THESE ACTIVITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
15. FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF T14E WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND
DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND TO PROVIDE FINAL CLEANUP ACTIVITIES AS
DIRECTED BY EITHER THE CITY OF EDMONDS OR T14E OWNER'S ENGINEER.
CITY OF EDMONDS
EROSION / SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL PLAN NOTES
ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENTATION/ EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES'MUST BE
CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE
THAT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAi� DRAINAGE
SYSTEM. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT
CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND POTENTIAL FOR ON -
SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. THE IMPLEMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL
BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE.
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON THESE
PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO MEET
ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UN
EXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, FACILITIES WILL BE
NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SfLATION CONTROL IN THE PROPOSED
SITE. DURING THE COURES OF CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION
AND RESPONSIBILTY OF THE PERMITTEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS
THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
FACILITIES, OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENMTS, AS MAY BE
NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER QUALITY OF THE
RECEIVING DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
3. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ONLY.
IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, SIZE,
NOR LOCATION OF PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS OR RETENTION
FACILITIES.
4. ANY DISTURBED AREA WHICH BEEN STRIPPED OF VECETATION AND WHERE
NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR MORE
MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH MULCHING, GRASS PLANTING, OR
OTHER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL TREATMENT APPLICABLE TO THE TIME
OF YEAR IN QUESTIONS. GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY
DURING THE MONTHS OF APRIL THROUGH SEPTEMBER, INCLUSIVE. SEEDING
MAY PROCEED OUTSIDE THE SPCIFIED TIME PERIOD WHENEVER IT IS IN THE
INTEREST OF THE PERMITTEE, BUT MUST BE AUGMENTED WITH MULCHING,
NETTING, OR OTHER TREATMENT APPROVED BY SNOHOMISH COUNTY.
.70, Aflq c,4 t A)
NOTE:
A- IF DRIVEWAY WIDTH EXCEEDS
15', INSTALL A FULL DEPTH EXPANSION
JOINT.
OR l---l'
16' VERTICAL CURB
DRIVEWAY APRON SHALL BE A MINIMUM EXPANSION JOINT
OF 6' THICK AND SHALL BE PLACED ON
OF 5/8' CSTC AND COMPACTED GRADE. .40 5'
1/2' LIP
6' CURB
CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 300OPSI I DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITIONAL DETAIL FOR
CURB AND GUTTER OR VERTICAL CURBS
CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED.
SEPARATELY FROM THE SIDEWALK.
FORM INSPEC TION REQUIRED PRIOR TO POUR.
F
UR
0
B
S
R
S
L
ME
E22MG
REVISIONS STAN DAR D D ETAI L
STANDARD DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE
'Est. 1890 DATE 5/14/98 —T-� NTS I DWG NO.
There were several issues with this permit during the review of the drawings. The biggest was
access width on the south side of the project. Originally the architect indicated two way traffic and
this would have required a 16' driveable access. In order to meet that requirement the architect was
told he first floor of the existing house to be cut back in order to get the required 16' and initially, that
was shown on the drawings. Our policy, although unwritten but used for years, required a two foot
shy distance from structures which the ECDC defined fences and of course buildings as structures.
This issue was expressed to the architect and when Gordy did the initial review and I carried if forth
when I took over. I sent Nasser excerpts from the code that defined structures and tried numerous
times to -explain why it was required. We went around and around on this and he procrastinated in
responding to our requirements. Finally he decided to make the access on the south side one-way
and we identified the access width as a minimum of 12'. With the first floor cut back and the access
one-way, the required distances could have been met. As it turned out, the architect's drawings did
not accurately depict the width between the existing fence and building. The shy distance was still
required from the fence but allowed him to place a curb along the side of the house, which was to
have landscaping behind it to provide some protection to the house. When inspected the minimum
width, shy distance, curbing and landscaping was not met nor could it be.
00-
�OLE
August 13, 1980
MEMO TO: Planning Department
FROM: Engineering Division
SUBJECT: AUGUST 20, 1980 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING
CONTINUED AGENDA
1. V-21-80 HAROLD WICKSTROM - Variance from required underground
requirement of Chapter 6.30.060 for property located
at 20331 83rd Avenue West. (RS-8)
No comment other than to note that the requirement was
made for undergrounding at the time of subdivision and
again at the time of building permit application. All
other newer homes in the area have underground electric
service.
2. V-22-80. NEAL & KAY JOHNSTON - Variance from required rear yard
setback, access width, and reduction of square footage
requirement at 21405 73rd Place West. (RML)
Engineering Division does not object t� this variance.
The existing 23 feet should be adequate for an access
road plus utility installation. At time of A.D.B. app-
lication the site plan shall be reviewed for code confor-
mance of said road plus parking layout and other site
improvements. We have no comment on the other two aspects
of this application.
AGENDA
I
3. V-24-80 DAVE HERMANS - Variance to waive minimum lot width to
length requirement and to allow fireplaces to inavade
setbacks approximately two feet at 221 3rd Ave. S. (RMH)
Neither of these variances shall adversley effect the
previously approved parking lot/site plans. Engineering
does not object to these variances. (See'ADB-114-78)
01 ��M M
DAN SMITH D-1
00
o's
0
Ll
4.18-60
,,�S!AJNVEA AND FEVIEW ASS16NMF-NrS-
ACTION- V-22-96DATE. 6-2-3-AriPAGE OF
'OWNER NAME; Necil os /-o 11
ADDRESS'. ZI.?Z- T;I:—ct AVE-WO
4�F Cl k417 0 Jf 4( 5 A- Zj3
APPLICANT 'NAME:
ADDRE55.,
SITE LOCATION OP, ADDRESS: 0 S-- 7.? jL-0 P4, 4u F
R M
LE,5AL DiScltjpTjo-N:, liot' S'o 4(4S&4ej� rrqcts pla, Alo, 3
ATTACHF-b
F I L FE
oft
TYPE OF
ACTION
D I V.
RECID.
DATE
to
tj
ul
cc
pol
A
%,
a.
�-
1,
,
x
%#.
z
tj
i
z
4c
.
maim(i
'PATE.
F-,S
u L. r s
ct
a
*
F
I L
E 0
1 N
Ift
0
,
X
3
p
t
z
a
!
ofilt
0'
va
NEXT
MEETING
PATE
SET
zo
0
CC
Do:
-c
4
al
cc
w
0
tn
IA
4
-
L
';(A
to
0
lid
7-- a -m
X,
A
x
w.
CL.
Assl4lap
DATE TO
I
NOTE S
DATE ay�—
q-
-A
u
sslamop
DATE To
ENGINEERING
R E V I E W5=--z----
NOTIES
DATE
By
PREVIOUS HISTORY
SITE REVIRW V(SITI
I
I
I
I
LITILI-TIES .. I
I
I
PRAlNA4F-/-r*Po6#tAP14Y
srREErs ISIDIWALKS
TRAFFICIFAFt KING
17,CNIN4 CODE
-FIRE MAXSHAL
I=IL.0
MEMO TO PLANNING
July 9, 1980
Page 3
S riLE
EE
7. V-22-30 NEAL & KAY JOHNSTON - Variance from required rear yard
setback access-width,--and--reductiornvlof square footage
r e q u i r e � e n t a tigg &d-61j7,f3kxd 2 RM I Zlelae'*s "t (RML)
Engineering Division does not object to this variance.
The existing 23 feet should be adequate for an access
road plus utility'installation. At time of A.D.B.
application the site plan shall be reviewed for code
conformance of said road plus parking layout and other
site improvements. We have no comment on the other two
aspects of this application.
8. V-23-80 J,.--DI,RK-LOFIMAN�--Vari-alh-t�-froiii required rear yard setback
At"1_8817. So-und-IU64- Place. �RS-12)
No comment.
DAN SMITH DT.
JIM ADAMS DT.
V-22-80 NEAL and KAY JOHNSTON-- Variance from required rear yard setba ck, access
wi an square footage requirement at 5 . 73rd , PI .- W../� (RML)
r1arices requested were to reduce OC ard setback from 20' to
v,90, - "and to allow 5 units when the area would support only 4.7 units. It
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 4 - July 16, 1980
was determined that a variance was not needed for the access width. Mr.
Bowman reviewed the variance criteria. This would not amount to a rezone
and there were no special conditions involved. Adjacent properties had
been developed to the north and west with multi -family and with single
family farther to the west. Strict enforcement of the zoning code would
deprive the property owner of rights enjoyed by other properties in the
same district because adjacent properties had been developed to a higher
density. There were no unnecessary hardships in carrying out the provisions
of the zoning code, however. Granting of the variances would not be detri-
mental to the health, safety, or welfare of other property owners in the
vicinity because of the higher density developed in adjacent areas. Mr.
Bowman felt both were minimum variances and that they would be compatible
with the zoning code as the property generally would be developed in
accordance with RML requirements. He recommended approval. The public
portion of the hearing was opened.
The applicant had nothing to add, and no one else wished to speak. The
public portion of the hearing was closed.
Mrs. Medina noted that they were 640 sq. ft. below the required area for
five units. She was told the intent was to build a fourplex behind the
existing house. Mrs. Medina observed that the zoning had been changed in
order to reduce the number of units on these lots so she did not believe
that 640 sq. ft. was a minimum variance. Mr. HatzenbOhler noted that it is
easier to build a fourplex than a triplex. MR. HATZENBUHLER MOVED TO
APPROVE V-22-80 BECAUSE HE DID NOT FEEL IT WOULD ENDANGER THE PUBLIC HEALTH
AND MORALS AND HE FELT IT WOULD BE IN HARMONY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND
WOULD MAKE REASONABLE USE OF THE LAND. VICE CHAIRMAN BYRD SECONDED THE
MOTION, FEELING IT WAS A MINIMUM VARIANCE WHEN CONSIDERING THE SURROUNDING
DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY. Mrs. Medina said the area around this site is
overdeveloped and the zoning was changed to alleviate some,of that. She
felt there was a valid reason to rez * one that'area and said added units
would create additional traffic. Mr. Hatzenbuhler argued that.property is
becoming a premium and it is not possible to spread out more so the only
choice Is to be more dense*on the ground. Mr. Bowman noted that the single
family development is farther to the west and that the apartment develop-
ment is all just to the north of this site and farther to the south. ' He
said this is one of.the last pieces of property there that can be developed
into apartments, that it is a single family house existing in a multi-
family zone. Mrs. Medina said there are children all over the place, and
the question was whether this was a minimum variance, and she thought it
was not. THE VOTE WAS TAKEN, WITH MR. HATZENBUHLER AND VICE CHAIRMAN BYRD.
VOTING YES, AND WITH MRS. MEDINA AND MRS. McGEE VOTING NO, RESULTING IN A
TIE VOTE. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A MAJORITY.
At the request of a person in the audience, MRS. MEDINA MOVED, SECONDED BY
MRS. McGEE, TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING. MOTION CARRIED.
The public portion of the hearing was reopened.
Don VanDriel, 1233 Olympic View Dr., said he had been involved in selling.
this property originally. He said the home is on the street and there is a
23' access alongside the home which is adequate for access to the rear.
The back portion of the property has large apartments on one side and a
nursing home at the back of it, and it becomes a large piece of property
which is zoned for multi -family dwellings. He felt the highest and best
usage In that area could best be served by allowing this variance. He said
it wou-Id not cause any problems because the other development is quite a
distance from the property line. Further, he noted that the change was
from a 3-unit to a 4-unit building, a matter of one additional unit, and
the design of a building normally is not that different, and for appearance's
sake it normally would not look that different. He also noted that the
buildings would not even be seen from the street. He felt that by limiting
it to three units that would be cutting down a large portion of the allowable
space and in the costs of construction and of land that would adversely
affect the owner. He said these fourplex units have become very acceptable
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 5 July 16, 1980
and are comfortable units, and the traffic conditions made by one unit
would not be adverse when you consider that the adjoining apartment building
is 34 or 35 units. He requested that the variance be approved.
There were no changes Indicated in any of the votes. MRS. MEDINA MOVED,
SECONDED BY MRS. McGEE, TO CONTINUE V-22-80 TO AUGUST 20, 1980 TO ALLOW
MORE BOARD MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE. THE MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney
--,Wayne Tanaka advised the Board members that they should not engage in any
,;Contact with any of the parties and they should not discuss this matter
..among themselves.
CITY OF 090
EDMONDS FILE #
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE F E E
REC-T #
HEARING DATE:
APPLICANT Neal & Kay JohnstorADDRESS 2132 93rd Ave. W 'CITY & ZIP Edmonds, 98020
PHONE 774 6198 _Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: Owner
OWNER: —Same ADDRESS,CITY & ZIP Same as Above PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS) 21405 73rd Place W. Edmonds, WA 98020
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERY: Lot #5, Luschen's Tracts Division No-3, as per plat
recorded in Volume 17 of plats -on p . age 87 records of Snohomish County; Situate
in the county of Snohomish, State of Washington
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED & APPROVE[
USE ZONE RML BY PLANNING DIVISION
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: 1.) Rear yard set back (20')
Vk rj,�- r-eq V'e �
2 r-1JK1z.Q-Q- -4 ) M; ; -P 4-
AMAIII Ok4 LACLL V UV CXPZ L I=qL4 LA I t�Lllt:l I UO
�7Tf A
VARIANCE REQUESTED: I.
Reduction of reai
0
r,
wi,Akh 3.) Allow a reduction of squ
W
footage requirement of 5.6 percent or 686sq.ft.
STATE14ENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
ATTACHED: See Attached
STATE OF WASHINGTON) Ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
.A
Si'gnatuKe of Applicant, Owner or Representative
On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, duly commi ssioned and sworn, personal ly appeared /`--.'- -,-/- - , - . / �,. . , - vtho, bein(
duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (s)he has preparedand read the-f—cre"Doing
statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are Lrun, and has
signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes ther6in
t4
men oned.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this.'..' day of C 19
if -residing at,,-,,."
Notary Public in and for,. -the State of WRMR0461-
JUL 8 i�,M
Di� u.
-O'ALLEGATIONS'OF APPLICANT
POINT 1. The 'following are the special circumstances whic . h apply to my property
which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity under the identical zone classification.
See Attached
POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the properties or improvements.in the vicinity of a zone in
which my property is located because'
See Attached
POINT 3. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will continue
to the owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond his control because:
See Attached
POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this
variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause in-
consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone
in which I am located.
Variance I and II: None
Variance III: It would seem appropiate if the applicant were
required to install a 5' solid cedar fence along
is - the rear property line. 1;17- i V E
J� YL 8 1980
r,
vi.g. Of pf3blic
0
0
A
WI/229 -#-b4 EDMON S LYP# MOUNTLAK&,
JIAL-I�w I %POD.
M-11cy --."
------------
112 64 E
*0 10-0 ..... . . . . . .
343.08
343.09
1 6 0
2
4
'ARSHE 'S
1�0 Id
McFis— ---- �'D 1 .4 M
s
N
W(BLAND6 p)�)OpOS eD
Z1317 S7 VA �44N 0 E Oil
ThAqT 2 %()
T4
Rom
:kT
2 3 4
5 84.4
2
LUS F6%#H]rN JS R C =S
80 4
so
6
'15
1'11.64
8TH ST. S. E. " - �o a
16 is NO.
— I�v i.
tl.-.:,.,
W, SOU4L
> ERS
Z6 'Z 5
0
V. .4 C A
tp!
217
0
L;!7
0 -1 IITH
R 0
I- 'L
S H
10 10� 15 uj 6
v
co
N�-I 4
5T 7.
CL 140.84
13DI V, N-0-- 3e
!p 140.70
A
12
10
60
------ IOTH
%F-86-0-7 ---------
28
AAA&
ST. S. E.
db M A ch A
29
30
-tj
W
23
0 C\1
FIVE"
ST.
6o L
S. E.
Z
R E C E-'4
JUL 8
Dir. Of
11g,44-
-q 't�
2
- �rpv Alum 16
W1 134 fh M tVr
toll
14.
s
T-
C A L F
I A
2 S'
7/7 1
N 0 0 2-5 '_,Fo Pi E C I V C-7,
THI 8 lQpn
Dir. Of Pij;,
�03
7G.
ZI-f ZZ
0-7
OT
&-f 9 90 -
4S
;-7"-6T2 6
xfj 4 7 9
.
T
If pil
ijk-
IWO-
CD
05
UJ
C C-1 NTI A (7 1'0 1
tMi NoW
OWNER ....
.......... .... ....... .......
. ... ...
.. ....
s T i I." ET
ui
110USE No.( ..... ........ .................
. .. ...... .
. . . ... . ........ .....
A V EN U F LOT N o. ....
.... BLOCK
.... ..
No, . ....
Ic z
N:%;MFl ADI') . ... ................ . ... .. ...... .. .........
.. .
........ . ............ ........
APPROVED
UG 4 1964
------------- -----------
Date
Approved:
.................... .............. DEPOSIT, $ ........................... ..... ........
�ACKFILL WORK ..............
i.8EWER NVORK ORDER ISSUED ..............
!N
0
0!*
POINT 1*:;
0'. Variance I :
The existing house vyas constructed too close to
the property line to allow required access. At
present the applicant is deprived of the right to
construct four units on his property because of
this circumstance.
Variance II:
The applicant had obta'ined an agreement to be
granted some additional land from the adjoining
property to the north. This additional,land
would have satisfied the zohing requirements.
The property to the north is presently a legal
non conforming building. By ordinance, this
precludes the granting of a lot line adj'�istment,
thus making the granting of said land impossible.
Variance III:
The required set back between the existing house
and the proposed new building causes the new building
to extend towards the rear of the yard farther than
would normally be required.
POINT 2:,
Variance I:
The proposed drive way will run parallel with an
abutting drive of a multi -unit building. The drive
will be consistent with existing drives in the
vicinity.
Variance II:
The granting of this variance will not adversley
effect or be injurious to any of the properties
in the vicinity. A majority of the surrounding
construction is at a higher density then this
variance would allow.
Variance IIIt
The building that is on the property abuttin
the rear of applicants prqper'tyis at a lower
elevation that causes most of.the proposed -
building site to be hidden from its view. JUL 8 1980
Taking this into consideration the granting
of a 2' variance would not adversley dffectDir.01P"�',"
that property. There would be no impact on any
other properties.
POINT
Variance It
If this variance is not',granted the owner
will be unable toconstru,ct,-a multi -family
building which his.'property is zonned for.
Variance II:
The applicant feels that the intent of the
RML Zoning is to limit densi ty to an accept-
able level. The addition of three tenths
of a unit seems to fall into this level of
acceptance. It would be an unnecessary
hardship to not be allowed to build within
the intent of the zoning laws.
Variance III:
There would be no hardship imposed directly
upon the owner of this property. The hard-
ship would be imposed upon the general public.
The applicant feels an obligation to provide
the most liveable rental unit he can. By not
granting this variance it would make it
unnecessarily difficult to build a enjoyable
living unit for a family.
RECD
JUL 8 1980
Dir. Of F;.. -
W.
49,44'
Moe � Vedm
W1,6,4 fiWf V�r
q,?. 2
NZ4
tk
6'
qo. 00
S le LAJ e,
,r7
IJ F
of A Oki
cn�
ISN
'zo,
;en ce-
N 0
Z�
0
0
RECEiVk----")
JUL 8 1980
Dir. of Public.
00
FILEC��' I T --i-I 6' F -E D M 0* . N D S
SEWER DEPARTMENT
STOPPAGE OF SANITARY SEWER MAIN REPORT
DATE:-8 — AS7 7.2, TIME CALL RECEIVED:
LOCATION OF STOPPAGE: 0,'j -'2 6 -2 1 P L,1-1
TIME OF ARRIVAL ON THE JOB SITE: c/:' �/o
TIME NORMAL,FLOW OF SANITARY IEWER REESTABLISHED: 9�'7-0 -t--
CAUSE OF STOPPAGE: 7 eq r -0 u
jw 0 C";-4 'c-& C) cc) ,--I k?�� L4 7-0
ACTION REQUIRED TO CLEAR,MAIN AND/OR LATERAL: ij, —
C/I
/7— c-�A r R U/,/v /-j C, t:E� (- (-- L-,, 14 c-- ;:r- r7_-7q /2
CITY CREW ON STOPPAGE CALL OUT (Personnel Involved):
R r
LOCATION OF RESIDENCE AFFECTED: IL
NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER: G c:::fz- I- G' L-A
-21 t1-0 2 *7 n- C-J
DESCRIBE.DAMAGE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY: /9/ C, 7-7 )4Z— F- r-
REMARKS: /0 c L./.-" tEjo /'%j r::=-v yt- -r-c) t- tET- IT C-)
kE L/ QpA.— b 4 — C,-jA-f zc/ 0 to t- �2 t) L.,-j A,) t—
Z' ton tZ- "�Xj
r
ATE RECEIVED —1
FPERMIT
7—/ 3---CD
EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE PERMIT
ZONE
N U M B E R rll?("�N - e�
J013 7 *111, 9 SVITE/APT#
ADDRESS 7
e-"140 -6- r::5�ed Wes r
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
CON4
OWNER 7AME/NAME OF BUSIN
0 NER Am E'
W ,�SS
7
F
PLAT NAM EISUBDIVI SION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
/ IS 5
hwss"S,'A PAM'p-lAw
LID FEE $
cc
Uj
u.?zJ3
z
31.
MAI ADDR
MAIL NG ADDRESS
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Approved
Aw Permit
0
EXISTING PROPOSED
Zerqu4ired
In R
Street Use Permit Req'd
Inspect on Required
Sldewa:k Required
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
1pi g-,
OW-36
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT
Unde
vvIrIng'gr'.0qUuidred
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES 0 No 0
Aj
ADDR)SS
A v�r IVV'
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
z
z
0
z
W
c2.3 Y-J
CITY ZIP
EPHONE
"(s)
77
-V 1410P xxl'�J_
NAME
01 Inh) t y
f R 'EVIE
ENGINEERING 'YVE�PATE
ADDRESS
CC
0
FIRE�' DATE
'REVIEWED BY
uj
l'-
z
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
LL
0
VARIANCE OR CU
—VIEW
SHORELINE 0 R(ow
INSPECTION
oREO 'D
BOND
IPOSTED
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
CHECKED BY
&,g§ 0 NO
SEP_A_ RE
COMPLETE EXE�PT
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PROPOSED
HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
UJI
I
I
_j
oo,
EXP
Cjl�.VEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH
x
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOSED
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT SIDE REAR
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT UR SIDE REAR
F-1 ADDITION COMMERCIAL Ej COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
3
z
z
PARKING
REQ'D PROVIDED
LOT AFIEAJPLANNING
REVIEWED BY D T
REMODEL "APARTMENT SIGN
REPAIR C] GRADI FENCE
- tYDS 0
J��e X FT)
REMARKS
DEMOLISH 0 TANK C] OTHER
70 mA7z'A)
o GARAGE ROETAINING WALL RENEWAL
CARPORT R CKERY
%) oci.,
(L
(TYPE OF USE BUSINES CTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
It.
_FCRITICALPj6dVW,0
CHECKED BY ITYPE
OF CONSTRUC ION
OCCUPANT
GROUP
V—
NUMBER
NUMBER OF
SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAREA
OCCUPANT
OF
DWELLING
AREAS
REQUIREDE]
LOAD
0
STORIES
U
NUMBER !2q-2j 4p-
YES
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
4-
4VJ-1 Sla'.
k
VALUATION
FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
_Tj
HEAT SOURCF___T_ GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING 000
PLAN CHECK NO' VESTED DATE PLUMBING
00 —.3 0_3
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
GRADING/FILL
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
5U
STATE SURCHARGE 1r
Cc PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
W
1.
0. PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
(A *APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
LU IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
LANDSCAPING
_j
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE
M ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
RECEIPT
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
_j
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RECEI T
If 1 WW
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE P7 --lc P-2 7
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THEYORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF THE'IfABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
CO�� DATE
WORKMEN F ION,!NSURANV'�1`4D RCW 18.27. OFFICI" SIGNA
SIGNATUF 09,A4�NT/ DAT�E41GYED (425)
4/n/o/
[;E'
771-02dLV
RELEASI�D BY DATE
A NTIOW / �1"r - EXTJ333
"j I/` . ? 1 7. _;
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW- INSPECTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
DATE RECEIVED
PERMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE PERMIT
Z 0 N E 4. 49
nxi NUMBER
JOB SU ! TE/APT
ADDRESS 7
"7
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWN�R NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAM E/SU BDIVI SION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
LID FEE $
cc
MAILING ADDRESS
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Appmed 0
RW Permit Required
U1
z
1" 1"
q
0
EXISTING PROPOSED- 7
Street Use Permit Req'd 0"
Inspection Required
Sidewalk Required
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
7n�, 7
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT
Und rground
a
Wir ng required
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. 9,F FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
0
Q
YES
,(�p NO
.9
uu
W
ADDRESS 0
REMARKS
EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
z
z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR
a
L)
z
W
4
in
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
71 A
NAME
17) kfj i
VREVIEWED/DATE
ENGINE�RING �.t, ZI
�_OmK,
ADDRESS
"'Id
0
Flptv�`RE D�TE
'�I EhED
z
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
I
)x
ILL
0
�kARI ANCE OR CU
SHORELINE
�?� - , -, ,
INSPECTION
.�, REO'D
BOND
POSTED
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
CHECKED BY
.-
I
7,��
E3,YES C] NO
SEPA REVIEW
COMPLETE EXEMPT
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PROPOSED
HEIGHT
ALLOW ED PROPOSED
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
W
7 4.
I
,
-ji
—
EXP
RESIDENTIAL
NEW PLUMBING MECH
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED, PROPOSED
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT SIDE REAR
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT URSIDE REAR
o COMPLIANCE OR
F-1 ADDITION COMMERCIAL
/0
z
z
CHANGE OF USE
PARKING
LOT AREA
PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REMODEL APARTMENT E] SIGN
RT�D PR�,,VIDED
4 �(,
0.
REPAIR GRAT FENCE
CYDS fut ( X FT)
REMARKS f
OTHER
F-1 DEMOLISH TANK
GARAGE RETA' NING WALL RENEWAL
CARPORT. ROC KERY
cc 4
(TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
P:
CHECKED BY
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
CODE OCCUPANL.
GROUP
0.
NUMBE�_
OF
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
CRITICAL
-14
AREAS
w
M
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
REQUIRED
A, OCCUPANT
LOAD
0
STORIES 411k,
UNITS
NUMBER
YES
Z.,
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
z
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER LIBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D
j
`7
VALUATION
FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
HEAT SOURCE GLA ING% LOT SLOPE %
BUILDING Zt.
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING . .....
.
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
STATE SURCHARGE
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
w
PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
ENP, I�SP I�N FEE
"APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ,�T
uj IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
i LANDSCAPING
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RECEIPT
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT Z
DEEMED TO MOD IFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENTOF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
_j
01 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.-
RECEIPT- 4
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE we
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT., AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK,AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO.PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE, OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S C? IN�IURANCE AND RC%Y,18.27.
4
...��SATION
OFFICIA�S SIGNATURE j DATE
SIGNATU DATE (425)
REif( NER' R AGENT) .�!GNED (A.
,4-
1
77-0220
a,
RELEASED BY DATE
AT,,TENTION EXT1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
FAX
5/98
vx,
City of Edmonds
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
A. Address or Vicinity of
2_1.40� _):5rPf11 L-3.
Permit No:
Issue Date: 7—
B. Type of Work (be snecific):'UT1 L4 T11, PM 106 16E, 4VPWC-0 OW-5
dA1, L.- FOR- 1 4*1 S.
C. Cbntractor�j H15 T:% C�4VA I.Va Contact: �0% D -0 0 r
Mailing Address: 30%.11 Lt'rr).e
D,e.A;r Phone:':20 C .3
State License #:1TH,5F Liability Insurance: Bond: $
D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. F1 Commercial F1 Subdivision E] City Project EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD)
Multi -Family E] Single family Other
INSPECTOR:
F. PAVEMENT CUT: [__1 YES El NO G. SIZE OF CUT x
CONCRETE CUT: [J YES El NO
Al'I'LICANT TO IZI,Al) ANI) SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands by his/her. signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harmless ftom
i . nj . uri . es, damages or claims of any kind or description' whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of
Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the efgnse of any legal proceedings including defense
costs and attor'neyfeesby reason ofgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOILOWING THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES 47LL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS
COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIMEA DEBITOR CREDIT 97LL BEPROCESSED FORISSUANCE TO THE -APPLICANT.
* Traffic. control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every
'flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the
required training in their possession.
* Restoration is to'be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City -
approved material prior to the end of the workday — 140 EXCEPTIONS.
* Three sets of construction drawings of proposedwork are required with the permit application.
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
I HA VE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE
THA TI MUSTMAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMITA VAILABLE ONSITEA TALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS
Signature: Date: **bO�2
or Agent)
W F 'CITY USE ONLY
OR,
Approved by: Right-of-wayFee:770 45
Tim , e Auth(irized;,Void After WgrA Disruption Fee/Fund 111:
Special Conditions�.'6�w F04 105W'Mxt ftl!�" estoration Fee:
A
AxM 1P_qV:PO4S K00 f**6 P0044tY4 . Total Fee:
P U ST em & A U %, AA00799 —1 AA;i6 e*J62AJ KAI_� Receipt No:__&r/)z.9
.08kJ6 10 Ift'W - IvI 9TkW n6 tA-1 lU11 CX PA)Iv8 1 Issued br.-
UPON COMPLETIONOF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 Of THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 42,5-771-0220, Ext. 13,A6)
FINAL APPROVAL OFPERMITTED WORK. DATE:1V,-LJQ3_
Inspector's Signature
For inSDection reauirements see
Information handout.
11103 IS Koff ff IMN MT M.
DAMy Documents\Forms\Engnmg\ROWpermit—.doc
W 001 on 1: 1 :4 - 010- WN ? F: Us:
SAM CHEN
15421 56th A\/f=NUE 5E
BOTHELL, INA5111N&TON claOI2
(20(b) -711-1515
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
5ECTION 2f-i TOM5HIF 2-T RAN&E 04 OUARTER NI/4 LU5CHEN5
TRACT5 Dl\/ 5 BLK 000 D-Ol TH FTN LOT 5 5D FLAT
BEIN& MORE PARTICULARLY DAF BE& 5Vq COR 5D LOT 5
TH NOO*51 05Yi ALC7 Yq LN 5D LOT P15T 4a.45FT TAFCR\/
TH NELY AL6 OR\/ To L HA\/6 RAD BEAR N4cl*06101N
O/A 45*25'42" RAD 40.00FT DIST 51.71FT TH Na5*25
Oe)E 64.8-IFT THSOO*25 54E 65.8-IFT TH Ne?1*15 45Y4
'14.45FT TO FOB AKA UNIT LOT A CITY OF r=r?M 55D No.
5- 05-55 REC AFN 20050'7015005
SITE ADDRESS
2150-1 '75rd PLACE NE5T
ZONING
RM-2.4
TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER
00501500000501
LOT AREA
5662 50UARE FEET
LOT COVERAGE
CALCULATION
NO CHAN65E
I f1j, a-3 11:01=111
LIVIN6 AREA
1240
SQUARE FEET MAIN LEVEL
LIVIN(5 AREA
c`125
SQUARE FEET LONER LEVEL
LIVIN6 AREA
4125
SQUARE FEET TOTAL
GARA&E
252
SQUARE FEET
DECK
1012
SQUARE FEET
� I 0L "D x0el m 01
A-1 51TE PLAN, FROJECT DATA AND INDEX OF DRANIN65
A-1.1 EXTERIOR EI_F_V`ATION5
A-2 UPPER LE\/EL FLOOR PLAN
A-5 LONER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
A-4 DETAIL5
(IS
10'7
9
1011
1
W
1
21�071
VO I I I
ILL11
Im
0
106
SITE P"LAN
SCALE. I" = 10'-0"
NORTH
M**
.55o2a,5,yj 151.641
5 R
tn
cl
Comer Flaa
�_C.tbacks_
—Asl L La I
Front
Sides
J%cr
Rear
Other
1- Lciqj'�_t
RANDALL J. MUNSON
BUILDING DESIGNER
17713
15TH AVENUE NORTHEAST
SUITE 102
SHORELINE
WASHINGTON
98155
(206) 349-4551
randy.munson@comcast.net
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
THIS PLAN IS ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES BY THE
CLIENT INDICATED.
REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS
DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
WRITTEN CONSENT OF DESIGNER,
RANDALL J. MUNSON, IS PROHIBITED.
DESIGNER MAINTAINS ALL RIGHTS
UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW,
INCLUDING COPYRIGHT.
CONTRACTOR NOTICE
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL
CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS
AT THE JOB SITE AND NOTIFY
THE DESIGNER OF ANY DIMEN-
SIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR
DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGIN-
NING OR FABRICATING ANY WORK.
DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
REVISIONS
No. Date Item
CITY OF EDMONDS
2L 10.13.14 CORRECTIONS #1
CITY OF EDMONDS
A2 07.17.15 CORRECTIONS #1
z
0
F_
0
z
_r
U)
z
0
LL
0
2
c\I
T_
0
00
0)
z
U)
LLJ
:D Z
z _r
z LLJ U) 00
Lu < ,
0c)
cz), 0')
C0 ED
T_
c\l
U 00 00
) , co 'c\'j
ITE PLAN, GENERAL
NOTES, PROJECT
DATA and INDEX OF
DRAWINGS
PROJECT NO.
:14.116
DESIGN
RJIVI
DRAWN
RJIVI
ISSUE DATE
:07.31.14
J
F
.. . . .... ..
11%
NW
1/4) NW 1/4, SECTION
2, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.
EX DRIVE EX POWER POLE
OHP-
- — — — — — — — — — — — — \\'� --------------------
EV ACOUAI T VW'C'
BENCHMARK
CB
TOP MONUMENT
EL=100
S89' 1 5'30"E (ASSUMED)
0
215TH ST SW I
Ln 0
El SSMH� 0
18.30.050 Development approval standards for erosion and sedimentation 0 C
control (ESQ plan.
A. ESC Minimurn Requirements. All activities necessitating a clearing or grading permit and all utility
nroiects consistina of more than 500 lineal feet of trench excavation shall be required to control erosion
and sediment during construction and to permanently stabilize exposed soil resulting from construction.
Projects involving a critical area may also be required to comply with any combination of the ESC
minimum requirements. Compliance will be demonstrated through the implementation of an approved ESC - W — — L
plan. Guidelines for preparing ESC plans are provided in the manual. The plan must address the following
i�quirements: EX CB EX CB
EX WATER VALVE
1. ESC Minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be,
whenever practical, limited to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or crushed— — — SD
rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface,
the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by
shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours. Street
washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner.
in
2. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land disturb g
activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BWs, including, but not limited to, sod,
hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected, designed, and (n
maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved
timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two days from October I through April PROVIDE TEMP CH
30 and no more than seven days from May I through September 30). BASIN PROTECTION 0
DURING CONSTRUCTION
3. ESC Minimum Requirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected
from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment bwTiers or filters, dikes
or mulching, or by a combination of these measures and other appropriate BMPS.
4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosio n and sediment control BMPs shall be regularly I
inspected and maintained by the owner to ensure continued performance of their intended flinction. All
maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual.
5. ESC Minimum Requirement - Other BMPs. As required by the city, other appropriate BMPs to mitigate
the effects of increased runoff shall be applied.
C9
6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement 6 Underground Utility Construction. The construction of
underground utility lines shall specifically address the following:
a. Erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; EX CB
b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be
placed on the uphill side of trenches;
c. Trench dewatering systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable
means); ry FDGP
d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; I ASPHALT
U)
e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance. V)
7. Additional ESC Minimum Requirements for Larger Developments. All new development and
redevelopment that includes land disturbing activities of greater than, or equal to, one acre in addition to EX 8" WATER —
meeting the minimum requirements set forth above shall comply with ESC requirements listed below.
8. ESC Minimum Requirement - Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits. In the field, mark clearing limits
and/or any easements, setbacks, sensitive/critical areas and the buffers, trees and drainage courses.
9. ESC Minimum Requirement - Sediment Trapping. Prior to leaving the site, storm water runoff shall pass
through a sediment pond or sediment trap, or other appropriate BMPs. Sediment ponds and traps, perimeter
dikes, sediment barriers, and other BMI?s intended to trap sediment on -site shall be constructed as a first
step in grading. These BMPs shall be functional before land disturbing activities take place. Earthen
30' R/W-
structures, such as dams, dikes, and diversions shall be seeded and mulched according to an approved 30' R/W
timetable.
V)
10. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and Fill Slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed
in a manner that will minimize erosion. In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC
Requirement No. 2.
11. ESC Minimum Requirement - Controlling Off -Site Erosion. Properties and water ways downstream
from development sites shall be protected from erosion due to increases in the volume, velocity, and peak
flow rate of stonn water runoff from the project site.
12. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Temporary Conveyance Channels and Outlets. All
temporary on -site conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed and stabilized to prevent erosion
from the expected velocity of flow from a two-year, 24-hour frequency storm for the developed condition.
Stabilization adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes and downstream reaches
shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems.
13. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storni Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable EX ASPHALT EDGE
during construction shall be protected so that storm water rursoff shall not enter the conveyance system
V.- I- I— �r_14 A + A +_ I,— +
without st e g OL V V1 W aW ta Va V, A VILLAUV %I OV VA. . I 1 1
14. ESC Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs I
shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are I
no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting 3:
from removal shall be permanently stabilized.
15. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Dewatering Construction Sites. Dewatering systems shall
discharge into a sediment trap or sediment pond.
16. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Control of Pollutants other than Sediment on EX FIRE HYDRANT
Construction Sites. All pollutants other than sediment that occur on site during construction shall be
handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of storm water.
17. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Financial Liability. Performance bonding, or other
�appropriate ancial instruments, shall be required for all projects to ensure compliance with the approved
erosion and tsediment control plan. [Ord. 3013 § 1, 1995).
APPROVED FOR
o')T
?rJSrTBU0T'ON
City Engigeer Date
A
J_ t-
I I I I I F- N 12 -T- A -7
L F I I-- I N
lklel"rAl I 'rr-kJM^MAM\J n/%f%1/
EX FENCE TO REMAIN
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1) Schedule and attend pre -construction meeting with city inspector.
2) Call 1-800-424-5555 for utililies locate.
3) Install temporary filter fabric fence along perimeter of site as shown on plan.
4) Install temporary rock constnction on entrance.
5) Install temporary inict proteciion for all catch Basins in the vicinity of protect which might get
effected by construction actiNities.
6) Temporary erosion and sedinentations control measures shown are minimum required. As
construction progresses and vnexpected (seasonal) conditions dictates, more siltation control
facilities may be required. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to address any new
conditions that may be created by his constriction activities.
7) Clear site within clearing limits while maintaining the temporary Erosion and sedimentation
control measures.
8) Stabilize and protect disturbcd areas as soon as possible.
9) Grade site in accordance I to approved plans. Limit exposed disturbed soil to 24 hr from Nov I
through April 30 and 5days from May 1 to Oct 3 1. Exposed soil must be protected by
temporary control measures such as mulching, seeding, plastic covering during construction
and also at the threat of rain.
10) Retain sediment within projcct site.
11) No sediment shall be trackee into the public street or on to paved surface. Sediment shall be
removed from trucks and eqdpment prior to leaving site. In the event of failure and transport
of sediment onto paved surfice, street sweeping shall be employed.
12) Install utilities in accordance to approval plan. All trench bedding and bectill shall be in
accordance to city standards.
13) Stabilize and hydro seed / laidscape exposed areas.
14) Maintain TESC facilities unlil all risk of erosion / sedimentation has passed. Do not convey
sediment -laden water into st)rm drainage system. TESC facilities to be removed upon final
site stabilization and inspection.
F—\ I \ /
L_J I V
ILW-VAI I -rr1JMfNnAnV r1l TrM
N I r-\
CONS
Jneer
CTk
LEGAL DESCRIPTION" —
LOT 5, LUSCHEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 3, AS PER
PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 87,
RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMiSH, STATE
OF WASHINGTON.
LEGEND
TYPE I CATCH BASIN
FIRE HYDRANT
WATERMAIN VALVE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
POWER POLE
OVERHEAD POWER LINE
MONUMENT
SILT FENCE
FENCE
EXISTING
El
IQ
M
0
0
—OHP—
E)
X_X_X
INSTALL TEMPORARY FILTER
FABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL
MERIDIAN
PLAT
10 5 0 10 20
6monammm! - I - I
I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
PROPOSED
0! P
I EXPIRES 02___1
N
AHMADNIA TRIPLEX
21405 73RD PL W
NASSAR AHMADNIA
SHEET TITLE:
TEMPORARY EROSION 77AND
SEDIMENTATION PLAN
NO. DATE REVISIONS
,ell I
fl '\%
ow�
S-HEET NO. : 7
2 oF
0