21420 HIGHWAY 99 (2).pdfcl TY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
121 STH AVENUE NORTH ED' MAYOR
MONDS, WA 98020 - (425)'771-0220 PAX (426) 7.71-0221
C1.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works Planning/Building Parks and Recreation Engineering Waste�vdterlreatrnent Plant
Transmittal
3,01
Date.
September 2, 1998
To:
ADB Applicants
Subject:
August 19, IN8 Architectural Design Boar I d Me 6ting
.0 Lul
Transmitting
ADS Synopsis
0
For Your Information:
LU LU
As you requested:
U- 0
z
LU
For your file
Comment: The appeal period for your item will be up on
z
September 16,1998. Please call the Planning
Department with any questions.
Note attachments: X
Sincerely,
Sh.ada Graham Administrative Assistant
Incorporoted August.11,1890 e
Sister Cities International Hekina j
F.-
!i'
LU
0
a
Uj
X
0
z
BOARDMEMBER OAKLIEF MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG, TO
AMEND THE MOTION BY INCLUDING THE CLARIFICATION THAT ATTACHMENT NO. 6
IS THE APPROVED FRONT ELEVATION. MOTION CARRIED.
ADB-98-51 APPLICATION BY RENT GRE GORY FOR A MULTISTORY, MIXED -USE
BUILDING CONTAINING COMIVIERCIAL FIOOR SPACE AND 13
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS.
Brad Beddall
654 - A Avenue South
Edmonds, WA 98020
Larry Parrett, Taylor -Gregory Architects, 600 Main Street, Suite C, Edmonds, WA 98020 was present.
BOARDMEMBER OAKLIEF MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG, TO
APPROVE ADB-98-51 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
0 CONTINGENT UPON TRAFFIC ISSUES BEING RESOLVED WITH THE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND ALL OTHER ENGINEERING ITEMS BEING
MET;
a LANDSCAPING WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING;
0 A FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR ADB APPROVAL
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING APPROVAL; AND
0 THE DUNTSTER SHALL BE MOVED TO THE SOUTH OPPOSITE THE DRIVE
AISLE, APPROXIMATELY IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ALLEY FRONTAGE OF
THE LOT;
BECAUSE WITH THESE MODIFICATIONS, THE APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER ADOPTED CITY
POLICIES, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND
SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
MOTION CARRIED.
APPLICATION BY KIRTLEY COLE TO DEVELOP A LOT ON HIGHWAY 99
WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR
WASH.
Edward J. Galliway
21420 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98020
Tim Flasher, Kirtley Cole, 1002 1 oth Street Snohomish, WA 98291 and Ed Galliway were present.
BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RAFLO, TO
APPROVE ADB-98-94 WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT SIGNS ARE NOT BEING
REVIEWED AT THIS TIME AND THAT THE TRASH ENCLOSURE IS GOING TO BE A
SPLIT -FACE CMU, MATCHING THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE THE
APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
OTHER ADOPTED CITY POLICIES, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION CARRIED.
Architectural Design Board Meeting
Page 5
August 19,1998 -
01:
Boardmember Oaklief stated that he feels the roof is well modulated. He asked the applicant to review
the building materials. The applicant stated that there is a gray -green metal roof, light ochre wood siding
and red brick at the base. He said that the applicant looked at several buildings to determine the color
pallet, and all the colors are used in Edmonds; for instance, the yellow is used on the Frances Anderson
Center.
Boardmember Goodrick complimented the applicant on the color scheme and said that her main concern
was landscaping. The Board discussed the potential for landscaping on the south side of the building
given the limited space. Chair Pierce suggested that the applicant consider using a climber or trellis
greenery to soften that elevation for the neighbors to the south. The applicant stated that they intend to
landscape but do not know how much room they will have to work with at this time.
Boardmember Rubenkonig complimented the applicant on their presentation stating that they went above
and beyond in providing the Board with adequate information to make a decision. She stated that she
would like to see some landscaping to soften the parking area. The applicant explained that there was
nothing they could do with the seven parking spaces on the alley, but the covered parking could
potentially incorporate some screening. He also stated that there is a proposed fence between the seven
alley parking spaces that will provide some visual buffer.
LU LUl
BOARDMEMBER OAKLIEF MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG, TO
2 :);
:) all
APPROVE ADB-98-51 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
U U)i
0 CONTINGENT UPON TRAFFIC ISSUES BEING RESOLVED WITH THE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND ALL OTHER ENGINEERING ITEMS BEING
UJ UJ
MET;
13 LANDSCAPING WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING;
U_
13 A FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR ADB APPROVAL
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING APPROVAL; AND
0 THE DUMPSTER SHALL BE MOVED TO THE SOUTH OPPOSITE THE DRIVE
0
AISLE, APPROXIMATELY IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ALLEY FRONTAGE OF
THE LOT;
BECAUSE WITH THESE MODIFICATIONS, THE APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER ADOPTED CITY
POLICIES, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND
SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
MOTION CARRIED.
ADB-99-94 APPLICATION BY KIRTLEY COLE TO DEVELOP A LOT ON HIGHWAY 99
WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR
WASH.
0
Edward J. Galliway
21420 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98020
Tim Flasher, Kirtley Cole, 1002 loth Street Snohomish, WA 98291 and Ed Galliway were present.
Senior Planner Bullock stated that the applicant has withdrawn their sign proposal at this time and
Chevron will be resubmitting a total sign package under a separate application. He explained that the
application was for a Chevron gas, convenience store, car wash, point of sale kiosk, and espresso stand
on the property located at 21420 Hwy 99. This property recently went through a three -lot short plat,
creating two lots that front on Hwy 99 and one lot that fronts on 72nd. One of the two lots on Hwy 99 is
a McDonalds, which has already been approved by the Board, and the other is the proposed Chevron
project. Mr. Bullock explained that the proposed project is located in a General Commercial zone
district, which encourages this type of use. The three buildings, the canopy for the gas islands, and the
Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 13 August 19,1998
0 'A"i
kiosk, which are the main structures, are similar in form and texture. The applicant has used several
different types of materials and in different combinations to tie them together. The one structure on the
property where the materials are not indicated on the plan is the trash enclosure, and that is something
the Board will need to have the applicant clarify. Mr. Bullock stated that the proposal meets the
requirements of the landscaping code except on the south property line, which is only three feet in width,
but that bed is actually in conjunction with a plating bed on the McDonald's site, so ultimately it will be
a ten -foot wide planting bed. One thing still required from the applicant is an indication of what they
plan on doing with that planting area. Staff feels the proposed project meets the goals and policies of the
comprehensive plan, the bulk standards of the zoning code, and with the modification to the southern
landscape bed from three to five feet and addressing the materials to be used on the trash enclosure, it
complies with the ADB criteria.
Mr. Flasher confirmed that the sign issues are going to be addressed separately. He also reference the
planting bed on the south property line stating that the intent is that the bed approved on the McDonald's
site be continued into that area. He concluded by stating that the trash enclosure is intended to be split -
face CMU to tie in with the rest of the buildings.
Audience comments — none.
LU Lui
Boardmember Raflo asked for clarification on the landscaping and asked if the rest of the landscaping is
coordinated with the landscaping on the McDonalds site. The applicant stated that the landscaping has
been designed separately, except for the center connecting bed, which will coordinate.
X
Boardmember Rubenkonig asked for clarification on the northern access. The applicant confirmed that it
01
was a right turn in only.
Z!
BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RAFLO, TO
0
APPROVE ADB-98-94 WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT SIGNS ARE NOT BEING
Z
REVIEWED AT THIS TIME AND THAT THE TRASH ENCLOSURE IS GOING TO BE A
SPLIT -FACE CMU, MATCHING THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE THE
APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
OTHER ADOPTED CITY POLICIES, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE AND SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION CARRIED.
ADB-98-112 APPLICATION By MR. HARVE IIAMSON FOR APPROVAL OF A
MODIFICATION TO THE APPROVED SIDING FOR A BUILDING APPROVED
UNDER FILE NO. ADB 96-29; AND TO APPROVE A BUILDING MOUNTED
SIGN ON THE SUBJECT BUILDING.
01
Harve Harrison
508 Bell Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
Harve Harrison, 210 Sunset Avenue, Edmonds, WA 98020 and Shirley Frank, 508 Bell Street,
Edmonds, WA 98020 were present.
Mr. Bullock distributed revised elevations to the Board and explained that this mixed -use complex was
previously approved by the Board in December of 1996. At that time the Board approved a horizontal
bevel siding on the front of the building, cement lap siding on the back. What has been constructed is
Shaker Town cedar siding on the front of the building and a board and batten type siding on the back and
the detached garages. Mr. Bullock stated that the Board would need to review the new siding. The other
issue is the sign that was added to the building as shown on the first elevation in the packet. The ADBs
Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 14 August 19, 1998
7' ': 7 7
. . .... . .....
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
STAFF REPORT
August 19, 1998 Meeting
PLANNING DIVISION
ADVISORY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
To: The hitectural gn ard
From:
StXe Bullock,-AICP
Senior Planner
Date: AUGUST 13,1998
ADB-97-94: Application b
-y IGrtll Cole to develop a lot on Highway 99 with a
Chevron gas station, convenience store and car wash.
A. Applican-tX/Property Owner ArchitecttRepresentative
l(irtley Cole Design/Build
Edward J. Galliway
1002 1 Oth Street
Snohon-dsh, WA 98291
B. Site Location: 21420 Highway 99
C. Introduction: The applicant is proposing to construct a new Chevron gas station, convenience
store, car wash, point of sale Mosk and Espresso stand located at 21420 Highway 99, at the old Alan
BMW site. This site has recently gone through a 3 lot short -plat which created 2 lots that front on
Highway 99. The southern of those two lots will be developed with a McDonalds, which the ADB has
already reviewed and approved. This project will occupy the northern of those two lots and will actually
share a driveway with McDonalds at their shared property line.
D. Background:
1. Zoning: The property is zoned General Commercial (CG) which allows the proposed use.
2. Environmental Review: The proposal is not exempt from the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA). The applicant has subn-dtted an environmental checklist. The City has issued a
Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. Therefore, the City and the applicant have complied
with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act.
3. Issues: The applicant has addressed the design of the building, site, and landscaping in their
proposal, and the Architectural Design Board must determine the appropriateness of the proposal,
E. Staff Analysis:
Page I of 5
Tj':
Staff Report for ADB- 1 P7-94
Vittley Col�awroo Develoornent
1. Building Design: Three buildings, a canopy with three gas islands and small kiosk are the
main structures that are proposed for the site. All three of the buildings, the convenience store, car
wash and espresso building will be simple in form and texture. This is an appropriate design
z concept for the Highway 99 corridor and a good job has been done to tie the site together through
the similar shapes of buildings and the repetition of colors. The convenience store is given added
importance by the fact that it is the only building that has a pitched roof and a metal standing sed,m
cc hip roof over the front doors.
Ulf
L d a) Materials:
00
The convenience store, espresso building and Mosk will all be constructed of stucco, while split
(n LUI
face CMU is used for the car wash. A blue and white metal fascia will be used on the car wa'sh,
Ln U. gas island canopy and Mosk. The only structure that is shown on the plan where no materials
0 are called out is the trash enclosure. With the development of the rest of the site, it would
LU
appear that a CMU wall would be the most consistent with the rest of the site.
:3
U. < b) Lighting:
CO :)
The applicant has proposed internally illuminated signage on the convenience store, pump i
ui canopy and car wash. These signs are proposed to be individual letters.
z I-,
I Nine free standing light standards are also proposed around the site and up to 18 fixtures wil be
01
� �-i mounted beneath the gas canopy. The provided photometrics plan indicates minimal off -site
U3 LUI light spillage.
c) Colors:
0—
The majority of the structures on the site will be primarily a Zepher Hill, gray, in combination
LU W with Havana Cream, beige. Accent colors of dark gray and red are used on the convenience�!
store, while blue and white are used on the car wash and gas canopy.
U.
0
z d) Signing:
Convenience Store: Four signs are proposed for this building, 3 on the east/street side of the i
building with one more on the south side. An additional 4 more "optionar' signs are proposed,
2 on the south and 2 on the north elevations. Based on the chart below, only one of the
z additional optional signs will be permitted due to sign area allowed by our code.
Signs for the
Convenience Store
Allowed
Proposed
Sign Area
56 square feet
Sign 1: 15.75 sq. it
Sign 2: 9 sq. ft.
Sign 3: 9 sq. ft.
Sign 4: 9 sq. ft
Total sign area:42.75 sq. ft
Sign 5: 9 sq. ft.
Sign 6: 9 sq. ft.
Sign 7: 9 sq. ft.
Sign 8: 9 sq. ft.
Total sign area: 36 sq. ft.
Sign Height
14 feet
Sign 1: 14 feet li
Sign 2: 11.5 feet
Sign 3: 6.5 feet
Sign 4: 6.5 feet
Sign 5: 6.5 feet
Sign 6: 6.5 feet
Sign 7: 6 ' 5 feet
Sign 8: 6.5 feet
Page 2 of 5
w
Staff Report for ADB-97-94
rinley Cole/Chevron Development
Pump Islands: Three signs are proposed for the pump island canopy, I logo/name sign on both
the north and south fagades and the main Name sign on the east elevation. Based on the chart
below, the proposal falls within the allowed area but it is over the allowed height. This being
the case, the ADB cannot approve the signage on the canopy, as it will require a variance before
it may exceed 14 feet in height. The board may wish to pass on a recommendation to the
Z;
U.1 Hearing Examiner regarding the appropriateness of the proposed signs should the applicant
choose to apply for a variance.
0
0
z
�41
Signs for the
Convenience Store
Allowed
Proposed
Sign Area
85 square feet
Sign 1: 18 sq. ft
Sign 2: 4.5 sq. ft.
Sign 3: 4.5 sq. ft
Total sign area: 27 sq. ft..
Sign Height
14 feet
Sign 1: 18.75 feet
Sign 2: 19 feet
Sign 3: 19 feet
Car Wash: The car wash is the only other building that is a part of this proposal that includes a
signage element at this time. On the fascia of the south elevation, the applicant is proposing a
single sign that states "Touch Free Wash". Based on the chart below, the proposal is over
maximum allowed area and height. This being the case, the applicant will need to reduce the
size of their sign and its height, or apply for a variance to get it approved as proposed.
Although the ADB cannot approve the signage as proposed, the board may wish to pass on a
recommendation to the Hearing Examiner regarding the appropriateness of the proposed signs
should the applicant choose to apply for a variance.
Signs for the
Convenience Store
Allowed
Proposed
Sign Area
28.5 square feet
Sign: 48 sq. ft.
Sign Height
14 feet
Sign: 15.5 feet
The applicant has also proposed a location for a new freestanding sign for which an application
will be made in the future. It is within the planting bed adjacent to Highway 99 between the two
driveways. Because there are no details of this sign it will have to come back to the Board for
their approval.
Site Design:
a) Access /Parking:
The applicant has proposed vehicle access from two points on Highway 99, one of them a
shared driveway with McDonalds. Parking for the site is outlined in the table below.
Uses
Required Parking Stalls
Proposed Parking Stalls
Gas Station
1/500 * 3230 = 6A6 stalls
12 stalls
Convenience Store
1/300 * 2100 = 7 stalls
Is stalls
CarWash
1/500 * 2280 = 4.56
13 stalls
Espresso Stand
1/500 * 312 =.62
1 stall
Klo
Total Uses
19 Parking Stalls Required
41 Parldng Stalls Provided
Page 3 of 5
11
Ei-
z
U.1 U
0-
Q �
LU L
X
U_
0
Z
Staff Repon for ADB.97-94
KiffleY COICIChevro� Developmnt
b) 1&ndSc_a_ "in
The applicant has proposed a wide variety of landscaping throughout the Site that includes
ground cover, shrubs and trees. The proposed landscaping appears to meet the minimum
standards for buffering, except along the southerly property line, where a 3-foot planting bed is
proposed. Although a 5-foot perimeter bed is required, the proposed bed actually connects with
and is part of a landscape bed on the adjacent property which is 7.5 feet wide. Together, the
two areas actually create a planting bed greater than 10 feet wide. That being the case, planning
staff has no more concern other than the fact that the landscape plan leaves this area empty. It
seems as though, at minimum, a note should be made that that area should be planted with
materials consistent with the adjacent bed.
With the ADB's approval of the reduced landscape bed on the south property line, the rest of
the landscape plan is consistent with ECDC 20.12
3. Technical Review:
a) Engineering Division
0 Project to be consistent with S-98-44 and the engineering department conditions in it.
b) Building Division
0 Compliance with the ADA requirements must be met.
* Civil Engineered Drawings must match the architectural drawings.
d) Public Works Division
Trash Enclosure:
Materials: The structure shall be constructed of solid screening at the height of
6'. (It may be built higher to screen the compactor unit, depending on finished
height of particular unit.) The gates only have the option of b L eing constructed of
chain -link with inserted vinyl slats.
F. Compliance with criteria: In order for the ADB to approve this item, the Board must make the
following findings:
1. That the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city policies.
2. Staff has found that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance.
The following table is an analysis of the bulk standard requirementsof the zoning ordinance:
tsunum Hei nt 45 feet 20 feet
Lot Coveraze No limitation
Setbacks" I i foot street I ) foot street'
(fully landscaped) (15 landscaped)
Some of the proposed signage is not consistent with the requirements of the zoning code as shown
above. Modifications must be made or an application for a variance must be approved to the sign
proposal.
3. That the proposal as approved or conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes
ECDC section 20.10, ADB Criteria, ECDC section 20.12, landscaping, and ECDC section
20.60, sign code.
Page 4 of 5
Tl
I
V,
Staff Report for ADR-91-94
Kirtley Cole/Chevron Development
G. Summary:
1. As proposed the project appears to be consistent with the requirements of the Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The, proposal can be conditioned to be consistent with the bulk standard and use requirements of,
the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The proposal appears to be consistent with the requirements of the criteria of ECDC sections
20. 10 and 20.12. The sign portion of the proposal appears to be inconsistent with the
requirements of the criteria of 20.60.
H. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this application with the following conditions:
The board finds that:
1.1 That the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted city
policies.
2. That the staff has found that as conditioned the proposal meets the requirements of the
zoning ordinance.
3. That the proposal as conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes ECDC
section 20.10, ADB Criteria, ECDC section 20.12, landscaping, and ECDC section 20.60,
sign code.
Therefore we move to approve ADB-97-94 with the following conditions:
The signage for the car wash and the pump, islands be modified to comply with the
Edmonds Community Development Code or a variance must be approved to allow them
at their current height and size.
• A reduction in the required landscape bed on the south property line from 51 down to 31.
• The trash enclosure be constructed of CMU to match the scale and texture of the other
structures in the complex.
&J
Attachment I
File No. ADB-97-94
0
NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME
IS LESS CLEAR THAN
..........
.
. . . . . . . . .
vl�
CASACADE'S FINEST VENTURERS, WLALSC�
EDMONDS CHEVRON & CA
NOTICE
LMR T"r
if
CASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES, I.L.C.
EDMONDS I"IVION & CIR W11"
NOTIC
I
CASACADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.Ljl�
EDMONDS CHEVRON AND CAR WA
L RT AN
DE'S FINEST VENTUR
E D Ot ' ' Ci
IDS CHEVRON AN D C F� �A I
.o Ztll
NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN TH
IS FRAME IS LESS CL AR THAN
LITY OF
......... . ...
- - - - - - - - - --
"Y�
-
---------
DIL
-Qs
H VIA-
IM 15
rn
M
Is <
14
CASCADE'S
FINEST VENTURES
L.L C.
111011 111HIP,
I I
111,11111
11
EDMONDS
CHEVRON AND CAi
WA'SH
01111']
;
M, a
'Iilo
pip-20 j
R
NOTICE: IF
TH.11LNO
101
i I �oo
d
His
Z
CASACADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.L.I.
I I
1111111,
Jill g
EDMONDS CHEVRON AND CAR WASH
I
NCLIC F THE DOCUMENT IN THIS ME IS LESS CL. THAN
IT IS DUE TO THE-0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------------
1.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------
--------------- -----------
- - - - - - - - - - -
wv
-1- ft 44. 4
z
I -All" "ll" I
E=-o
0 - - - - - -
- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Industries
P.
z I_;
z
Uj wi
U Ln
LU
z
0
z
Mug= It+, Inio
To Recipients of ADB Hearing Notice:
The hearing for the Architectural Design Board onAugustl9th has been relocatedtothe Public Works Training Room at
7110 21011 St. SW. Please call (425) 771-0220 if you have any questions. Sorry for the inconvenience.
City of Edmonds Planning Department
tt VS
City of Edmonds ADB Meeting Relocation
August 14.1998
To Recipients of ADB Hearing Notice:
The hearing for the Architectural Design Board on August 19th has been relocated to the Public Works, Training Room at
7110 21 Oth St. SW. Please call (425) 771-0220 If you have any questions. Sorry for the inconvenience.
*"T mxf 1VA*in^inAm A INIM IWaa+;1mdv 10allnon *w^ws
August 14,1998
To Recipients of ADB Hearing Notice:
The hearing for the Architectural Design Board on August 19th has been relocated to the Public Works Training Room at
7110 21 Oth St. SW. Please call (425) 771-0220 if you have any questions. Sorry for the inconvenience.
City of Edmonds Planning Department
0
Y
"I",
y
...... ......
5807-000-002-02-00 .5807-600-065-0049
5807-000-0
4� Resident ? qp,02-06
e
;R* s id e S, e
es
Xk
W&"- 7100 912th St ,l
J44A Sw 71X ' 12th St SW
mond
Edmonds, WA. 98026 monds, wA. 58026
5807-000-006-03-05 5807-000-006-04-04 5807400-00645-03
Resident Resident Resident
21400 Hwy 99 21318 Hwy 99 21314 Hwy 99
z Edmonds, WA. 98026, Edmonds, WA. 98026 Edmonds, WA. 08026
LU
5807-009:PQ6-06-02, 5807-OOO-OO6-n7-01 5807-000-007-01-06
R Residen :Reiident
H
Hw
w
y 99
M 1 �21sl �213�wy 99
Uil mohds mo 21311 Hwy 99
monds . WA. 98026
monds,�WA. 98026 Edmonds, WA, 98026*
(a U.
uj 0 5807 000-09�A3-04 5807-000-020-02-08 5807400-02 -07
Resi;en Resident S�
..Reside
9 St
U- < 69X���h St SW 6925 216th St SW 69 16th St SW
Wonds, WA. 98026 Edmonds, WA. 98026 .e monds, WA. 98026
z I.-
5807-060.021-01"08 5807-000"021-02-07 5807400"02143-06
Resident
LU LW Resident Resident
2 MI J 21515 Hwy 99 21407 Hwy 99
5 C11 21420 Hwy 99,
Edmonds, WA.' 98026 Edmonds, WA, 98026 Edmonds, WA. 98026
LU LU
5807-000-0 -05 5807-000421-05,04 5807-000-0224147
Resi - d Resident
U. '0- R I �000 Resident
21 Hwy 99 21508 Hwy 99
0 mo 21558 Hwy 99
M monds,�WA. 98026 Edmonds, WA. 98026 Edmonds, wA. 98026
z
5807-000- -03-05 580?;000- 4-04 -03
0 5807-000-022-06
Residero� Res�ie� REsident
5
a2 15 wy 99
15 r HwZy 99 215' wy 99
0 s 21431 72nd Ave W
onds, WA. 98026 Ei�onds, WA, 98026 Edmonds, WA, 98026
5807-000-023-00-07 5807-OQO-023-01-06
Resident
Resident
21500 72nd Ave W 21400 72nd AVe W
Edmonds, WA. 98026 Edmonds, WA. 98026
0
I I "ITM IM"I"TIMPOR" P I- "R "R
0
a
LU
LL
LB
Y
0
z
0
5807-000-002-02-00 �—�
,Park Edmond Apts LLQ,--'j
1140 PatkWe Or E k�J.
-Seattle, WA. 98112
5807-000-006-03-05
B & M Contractors
P.O. Box 216
Lynnwoodi WA 98046
.5807-000-006-06-02
Joshua Green Corp
P.O. Box 21829
Seattle, WA. 98111
5807-000-005-00-09 6807-000-006-02-06
Allied Bldg Products John W M
Route 17 North b'n
16
East Rutheford, NJ 08830 -��WOOI. WA. 98046
5807-000,00644441 5807,000-006-05-03
John W MIlls Broadus Family LLC
P.O. Box 916 120 116th Ave NE
Lynnwood,.WA, 98046 Bellevue, WA. 98004
51?17;000,_,D�0741 5807400497---.0146
M Tis Ja hua
P ! uaox - en Corp
' , 's
P Q, 216 0 21829
'98046 tt7 W,
�y,n,nr,W,,0B00d, WA, �eattlex. WA, '98111
.5807-000-007 -04 5807-000420-02-08 58074004204347
J s r
Joshua G Corp Beacon Homes Inc 40shus r Corp
P!W r I
0 2
�290
P.O. 218 P.O. Box 45898 ox 21829
S ttl VA. W
, W . 91
tle, WA. 98111 Seattle, 98145 -�eattle, WA. 98111
5807-000-021-01-08 5807-000 0 -07
ro
Fife Investments Joshu ;ge'en-Corp Snoh0XW_Co Hospital D-
s
ox
21515 Hwy 99 P tlox ;1829 &KU 76th Ave W
a. -"Edmonds, WA.
Lynnwood, WA. 98036 2�
ttle, WA, 98111 98026
5807400-021-04-05 5807-000421-05.04 5807 000".0 1"07
Snohomish Co Hospital -96e4-4 Harold Stadick Publ; pitil Dist 2
21600 76th Ave W 18549 Wallingford.Ave N nm
76th Ave W
Edmonds, WA. 98026 Seattle, �A. 98133 Edmonds,*WA. 98026
5807-000-022,-W-05
Public. Hjwrtal Dist 2
216OX,-76th Ave W
Edm6nds, WA. 98026
5807400-023-00-07
Danmor Company
21500 72nd Ave W
Edmonds, WA. 98026
5807-000-0 "04
Public pital.Dist 2
7c thpi v I.
.2� mo 76th Ave:W
s. So
dmonds, WA, 98026
6807-000-023-01-06
Unicare Home5 Inc
105 W Michigan
Milwaukee, Wr 53203
58074004224543
Thomas C Cherpeski
1412 243rd PI SE
Bothel-1, WA, 98021
ADJAG
Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list.
On y oath,'I certify that the narn
M e�s and addresses provided represent all properties
(n U. located Within 300 feet of the subject prop".
W 0
Signature of Applicant or licants Rep
01 resentative
re Me day
Subscribed and sworn to befo this
C1 of r
Q
Ila
0
J
LU us g N111jiu%
U- 0 5,0
z Q
di
Notary blic in and e Slate of Washington
f
U
0
z
Residing at
AM.d*cV.ATmp\fb=
I I PON, 111111 1 1 Ill 1 11 1 .11111 0-
uj
F�
5807-000-002-02-00 5807-600-005-0049
5807-000-00 -02-06
'Resident es
0". Re ide
7100 912th St Sw IX ' 1
71 12th St SW
Edmonds. WA. 98026 mo s
monds, WA. l8026
5807-000-006-03-05 5807-000-006-04-04, 5807-000-00645-03
Resident Resident Resident
21400 Hwy 99 21318 Hwy 99 .21314 Hwy 99
Edmonds, WA. 98026 Edmond's, wA. 98026 Edmonds, WA. 08026
5807-000-,%6-06-02, 5807 000 006 7-01
5807 000-00741 06
Resid e Resl5en
21 99 wy 99 Reii;ent
WY 2 1 21311 Hwy 99
,�rmohds, WA. 98626 Edmonds, WA. 98026 Edmonds, WA, 98026*
5807-000-007
ZA344 5807-000-02M248 5807-000490xa,47
R iden Resident Re�3fde
65 K-r6th St SW '6925 216th St SW .69 ' 16th St SW
onds, WA.. 98026 Edmonds, WA. �98026 .E m S. W
monds, WA. 98026
5807-000421-01,08 5807-000-02142-07 5807400--,0214346
Resident Resident Resident
21515 Hwy 99 21407 Hwy 99 21420 Hwy 99
Edmonds, WA. Edmonds, WA, 98026 Edmonds, WA. 98026
5807.400-9ZI414-05 5807-000-021-05,04 5807"000-02241-r07
Resid Resident Resident
21 Hwy 99 21508 Hwy 99 21558 jiwy 99
monds, WA. 98026 Edmonds, WA, 98026 Edmonds, WA.� 98026
5807-000-OR-03-05 5807;O00-0-22<4-04 5807-000-022-06-03,
UE5ide Res i ep- REsident
Hwy 99 5 �-21431 72nd Ave W
,WA. 98026 2Edl rondsW,YWA99, 98026 Edmonds, WA, 98026
5807-000-023-00-07 5807-000-023,01-06
Resident Resident
+
U.
---' --- --- -- --
8 & M Contractors
P.O. Box 218
Lynnwoodj WA 98046 _..
5807-000-006-06-02 Joshua Green Corp'
` P.O. Box 21829
Seattle, WA, 98111 '
'
�
�
| mw�f�le, WA. 3O1D
\ -�-_
5807-000-0121-01-08
Fife Investments
21515 Hwy 99
^
Lynnwood,
5807~000~021-04_055807~000431-05~04� `� � �'580 pi Snohomish
l�iyt=2 Harold Stadluk ' �Pub al it
ta
t 2
21500 7 - l8543 Wal �YeN �-00N-gQ
W
Edmonds, WA. 98026 Seattle, ,88lJ3 '-W4. 98028
2
Edmincs".%. 98026
5807400-023-00-07
Danmor Company Edmonds, WA. 98026
5807-000,02
5807-000-023-01-06
Unisarm Homes %np '
105 WMMnhYQan
Milwaukee, WI 53203
---'---------`~
Thomas
1412 243rd/'^ °E
' Bothel7* WA, 98021
UJ
LU
0
z
Attach'this note
rized declaration to the adja
cent property owners list
On,my 02th I Certify that the names
and address provided represent all properties
located within 300 feet of the subject p es
roperty.
or
Signature,of Applicant or licants Represe'ntative
Subscribed and MOM to befo
re me this —day Of
J eiv,
�ablic in and f
z CJ
Notary blic in and S'
e S ate of I
We 6in-_
!-29 gton
Residing at
A".dod%
ATeMP\f
Orms
t7m
NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN
MIE
_pUETO_TH§A!�AU7 OF THE DOCUI
- - - - - - - - - -
1w,
01 0ji
10;
it
HIS 111111 1, 11im
jai 1! 54;1 ED jj
m
>
CASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES
L.I. C. kip s 'goiji.
EDMONDS CHEVRON AND CA Ii
WA'SH
EDMONDS, WA
U uM
0
l
110
lu
LEFT SIDE
El
lil
E)
co
RECEIVED
JUN 2 2 1998
-DEPT.
Egaai� -:Fr
0
0
A 2
25X
NOTICE: IF THE DOCU1,A'NT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN
E DOCUMENT.
TOT UALITY OF-T
K�
1p
EX
Pqj
KJ
j
ell
C A S A C A D E'S F I N E 5 T
V E N T U R E S, L. L. 1.
111111plij,1111IJ!,11111
I
EDMONDS
CHEVRON
AND CAR WASH
1111111nppig!"In
F
k,
EDMONDS WASHINGTON
0
NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN
N(V�ICSJLJS DUE TY OF THE DOCUMENT.
it
it
(7,
x
-2
All-
tHRR,
RKHH
r
(D
+
mill"
I
P2
CASCADE'S FINEST VENTURES, L.L.C.
I POP
11
EDMONDS CHEVRON A CAR WASH
I p
11111111
IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS THAN
NOTICE:
Is g_OTICE,IT IS DUE TO
z
D
U
0
a
W
U_
01
0
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRnynON
1
6/22/98
Revised SEPA Application
5
6/22/98
Full Size Set of Plans (Site Plan and Elevations)
1
6/22/98
1 lx17 Reduction of Plans (Site Plan and Elevations),
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For approval - F1 Approved as submitted El Resubmit copies for approval
El For your use El Approved as noted Elsubmit copies for distribution
As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For
review and comment
REMARKS: Color Elevations to follow with Landscape Revised Landscape Plan
cc: File
SIGNED: Edward J. Galliway KIRTLEY COLE Design -Build
Tel(360)568-1822 Fax(360)563-9475 100216thStreet �Mboill.719' S�ohomish. WA 913291 www3druey-polexam
Fl-
L)
0
a
LU
LL.
W
0
z
Washington State Northwest Region
Departlinent of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North
Sid Morrison P.O. Box 3303 10
Secretary of Transportation Seattle, WA 98133-9710
(206 )440-4000
June 23, 1998
Mr. Jeffrey S. Wilson,
Planning Supervisor
City,of Edmonds Dept. of
community services
250 - 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
SR-99 M.P.45.60 Vic. 'C.S.3101
Mitigated Determination
Application.For A Building
Permit For Kirtley Cole
City File No. ADB-97-94
Dear Mr. Wilson,
The applicant seeks approval to construct a new.gas station,
a 2,000 square foot convenience store, 200 square foot
espresso stand, 1,700 square foot car wash and a new 3,348
square foot fast food restaurant with drive through and 37
parking stalls. This proposed development would be L
completed in two phases. The location of this development
is on the west side of SR-99; approximately 2 blocks north
of the SR-99/216 th Street S.W. intersection.
We concur with the applicant being required to contribute
traffic mitigation fees for this proposed development's
impacts to SR-99. The applicant is required to contribu e
$40c;72.54 for Phase 1 and $8,904.42 for PhaSeL
The proposed access connections to SR-99 are the city's
jurisdiction in reviewing and approving them. The,
guidelines for allowing access connections to a,state
highway per WAC 468-51 and WAC 468-52 should be adhered to
in approving these access connections.
If channelization revisions are required on SR-99Lby the
city, a revised channelization plan must be submitted to
WSDOT for review and approval.
Any utility connections or relocations within the�SR_99 L
right-of-way are the city's jurisdiction for,rev:Lew and
approval. The applicant and -individual utility.com'pan'les
must apply for and obtain thepermit/franchise for,these
utility connections/relocations from the. city.
Eli
UJI
51 &une�,, 2 3 9 9
d6ff rdy.'S.,. Wilson',.,
U L UA age'.,
UA
LL
',�ank f th op L po , rtunity to 6 h', -fo , r
.0 you or e omment on 't: e� DMNS'�
any I q u e st f eel -f ke e'
2, th s 4pp ication. Should- you have
Hurter. (�0'6):L 440:-;4664 � or kd.LLGi (20 �:440
49
of i s sect'
MYI.Deve oper,Sery c.e ion.:'
C)
Z,
Sin e
Of.
05 UJI
So
T E
M
Pi
anager
Loca C r in ion
LU
.LU
X 4U
ELG-elq',
�i- 0
z
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes explain:
No.
(Staff Comment)
S. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal:
None.
F:-
LU
z
. .. .. ....
RECEIVED
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
JUN 2 2 1998
A. BACKGROUND
PLANNING DEPT.
1.
Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Edmonds Chevron and Car Wash
2.
Name of applicant:
Kirtley Cole DesigniBuild
3.
Address, and phone number of applicant and contact person;
Edward I Galliway
PO Box 1179
1002 Tenth Street
Snohomish, WA 98290
(360)568-1822
(360)563-9475 Fax
4.1
date checklist prepared:
July 3, 1997; Revised June 16, 1998.
5.
Agency requesting checklist:
City of Edmonds
6.
Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Start construction within I week of receiving building permit, construction will last about 120
(lays.
(Staff Comment)
21
10. List any government approvals or pernd ts that Will bi needed for your proposal, if known.
City of Edmonds Commercial Building Permit, Plumbing, Mechanical, P/W.
D.O.E. — Tank Installation
Puget Sound Air — Vapor Recover Permit
Dept. Of Labor & industries — Electrical
(Staff Comment)
UJ
L)
to
(n UJI
:C1
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposed uses and the size of the project and site.
III
-J t—!
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of
(n LL
—0
your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page (Lead agencies may
W
modify this form to include additional specific information on project description).
Construct a 2,100 square foot Chevron Grand Entrance Convenience Store, A Chevron
canopy for (6) Multi -Product Dispensers (MPD), A 2,280 square foot car wash building with
U.
a 30 square foot Point of Sale (P.O.S.) Kiosk, A 200 square foot Espresso Stand and a 400
square foot Trash Enclosure. Two new 20,000 gallon Underground Storage Tanks (UST) will
be installed for the storage of petroleum and new landscaping will be added.
Z 1-1
(Staff Comment)
z �—1
Lu Lur,
% :)�
Sol
U U)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to unders tand the precise
UJ LU
location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, to ship,
wn
and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
LL 0
z
topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by
the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps of detailed plans submitted with any
3:
permit applications related to this checklist
0
Please see attached vicinity map, legal description and tax ID number. The site is located at
z
21420 ffighway 99 in Edmonds, Washington.
(Staff Comment)
B. ENVULONMENTAL ELEMENTS
a. General description of the site (circle one)):
ELat2 roiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
(Staff Comment)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Less than S%
M
(Staff Comment)
F,07
Rez
"", rT ar
FRA . M-1: , w,� iiaA�2 i�;,
4-�
c. What general types of solls are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel,
peat, mucky) ffyou know the classilleation of agricultural soils specify them and
note any prime fatinland?
Sandy soil.
(Staff Comment)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils In the Immediate vicinity?
Lull
If soi describe.
No.
—0
(Staff Comment)
4
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
us
proposed. Indicate source of an.
z �-i
Remove 600 cubic yards of soil and replace with pea gravel and tanks for fuel
excavation.
Ujj
(Staff Comment)
5 a
0
W
L Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
0-
describe.
No, stuface water will be diverted to existing catch basins.
Uj
(Staff Comment)
z
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervitios surfaces after the
project construction (for example, asphalt or building)?
85%
(Staff Comment)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other Impacts to the earth, if
0
any:
Follow the temporary erosion control plan as will be submitted and approved by the
City of Edmonds Public Works.
(Staff Comment)
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal i.e., dust,
automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the projici'�"I'
is completed? Hany, generally describe and give approximate quantities if kno
"777,"
MA
I
ui
2
M
u
0
a
uj
I'L
uj
0
z
LU
U-
tB
z
0,
No.
(Staff Comment)
5) Does the proposal He within a 100-yiar'floodplalu? If soi note location on
the site plan.
No.
(Staff Comment).
6) Does the proposal involve any discarge of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No.
(Staff Comment)
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if
known.
No.
(Staff Comment)
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example.. Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; I etc.).
Describe the general size of the sytem, the number of such sytems, the
number of housed to be served.(if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Site will be connected to sewer system.
(Staff Comment)
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) aid method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quanities, if known). Where will the
water flow? Will the water flow inot other waters? If so, describe.
Storm water will be collected and run through an approved drainage system.
(Staff Comment)
'A 'T' j,
t; -4
j ,
jo,7*%
2) Could waste materials, enter ground or surtice waters? If so, generally
describe.
No.
(Staff Comment)
LUI
Jul d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,
U Ifany:
V)
LO Follow all regulations regarding clean water through approved storm drainage plan.
LU
to CU) (Staff Comment)
Uj
:3
U. <
to M 4. -PLANTS
Cl
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
z I.-
decidous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
Ui LU evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
XX grass
0—
pasture
LU Uj L crop or grain
X U
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
LL 0 skunk cabbage, other
ZI — water plants: water My, eelgrass, milfail, other
Q — other types of vegetsion
(Staff Comment)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
There will be new landscape added.
(Staff Comment)
t. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(Staff Comment)
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any.
Planning on upgrading landscaping, to be approved by the City of Edmonds.
(Staff Comment)
LU
LL
z
8., LAND AND SHORELV*rUSE
a. What is the cu rrent use of the site and adjac ut poerfies?
e Oro
CdMM=ial eSeS
A U
0
(Staff Comment)
j
1) u.
0
M
b. Has the site been used for agricd ture. 'If soj describe.
No,
(Staff COMment),_
76
j sjn:� itr
c. Describ UCtUMS on the Site.
Ui
None:
B
(SfAffCOMMent)r
0
LU Uj
X
d. Will any structu h'
res be deinolisheOr IfSoj W at.
z
f
N/A
LU
(Staff Comment)
0
z
e. Whit is the current zoning he site?
Classification oft
CG2
(Staff Comment)
current C
f. Whit Is the omprehensive'plan designation of the si e
Do not know.
(StaffComment)
,4� ,
9- Happlicable, what is the cu t shoreline mute program eslgnation�of the site?
N/A
J
(Staff Comment)
.222",
h. Elas any part of the site been classilled.as an �Ienvlroumentally sensitive" area? if
so, specify.
No
(Staff Comment)
LU U�
J [ I 1 1. Approximately how many people would reside oi- work in the comleted project?
081 1 1 1 . I . 1 1 6 to 7 people will be employed.
LO, LU
LU
(Staff Comment)
U) LL
0
U
LL
(n J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
ul�
z
(Staff Comment)
0
LU LUI
IL Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement Impacts, ffluy:
0 e I I
C1 None.
LU LU
(Staff Comment)
LL
..
LU
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing projected land
uses and plans, if any:
None, site is existing,
(Staff Comment)
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any?,. indicate whether high,
middle, or. low-income housing.
None
(Staff Comment)
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
None
(Staff Comment)
".-777
"".-"!.,7777 77 7,7'777 "T.
Lul:
= Sil't
z
"Z
1,", 4;1'
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light a d glare impacts, If any:
Plans per Non -Residential Energy Code..
(Staff Comment)
z
12. RECREATION
.J
L)
a. What designated and Informal
recreational opportunities are in the immediate
LO LUI
vicinity?
None
U) LL
UJ
(Staff Comment)
LL
b. Would the proposed project. dis place any.existing recreational uses? Uso de scribe.
None
0
(Staff Comment)
z
LU LUJ
0—
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation including recreation
LU LU
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, If any:
None
z
(Staff Comment)
LAJ
z
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, naitionaL state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? U so, generally describe.
None
(Staff Comment)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of hlstorlc� archeological, scientific,
orcultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None
(Staff Comment)
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control, Impacts.,if any*
None
(Staff Comment)
. ..... . .......
14. �SP�ORTAT�XON
a., Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access
to the existing strict systenL Show on site plans U any.
ffighway 99, 2 access points 7and a shared access to the south.
one right -in onl
r
UJI (Staff Comment)
J 01
LU! b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what Is the approximated distance
'U
to the nearest transit stop?
Do not know
JJ 0
2 (Staff Conment)
9 _J1
LL <
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? HOW Many would the
z 1-1 project eflMIL
note?
There will be (1) new ADA Van accessible space, (12) located under the ffieling
UJ LU, canopy, 21 standard spaces and (6) vacuum spaces.
(Staff Comment)
0
X
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to ex Isting
�LLL 0
roads or streets, not including driveways? ffso, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private).
No
z (Staff Comment)
e. Will the project use (or occur In the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
(Staff Comment)
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? if
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
About 250 trips per day, Peak will be from 6-8 am and 4-6 pm.
(Staff Comment)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None
Mv�
��IIRMM V
.(Staff Comment)
15.'PUBLIC SERVICES
wi.
a. Would the project result in an Increased need for public services (for example- nre
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Uso, generally describe.
No
rn) IWU
U
(Staff Connoent)
J
—0
b. Proposed measures to reduce or CoutiolLdirect impacts on public services, if any.
None
EL
(Staff Comment)
LU UJI
16. UTIUMM
U 0
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:, SlIgiricift, natural gas, water, refuse
0
telealiones sanitary stw--er, septic system, other.
UJ UJ
M
(Staff Comment)
LL. 0
ZI
1B
U
C.SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of in, ywleagp understand that the lead
y kn I d I
agency is relying on them to make its 4 ion.
Signature:
NamePrinted: ey. r '0/
Date Submitted- -,I E."
�0
0�4
z
0
a
uj
tu
0
z
jAmm PIERRE SHORT PLAT LEGAL DEsauvnoN(CONTINUEI)) PAGE20F3
THENCE N63*47'IWV 4836 FEET TO A POINTLYING S88*4VIVE A DISTANCE OF 16.66 FEEI
FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIlfMQ.
THENCE N88*4-V 15"W 16.66PEETTOTHETRUEPOINTOEBEGINNING.
ALLTHATPORTIONOFLOTS 21 AND22, SOL?WS FIVE ACRETRAMS ' ACCORDINGTO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 25, RECORDS OF TIM
AUDITOR OF THE COUNTY OF SNOHOWSH. STATE OF WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT TEE NOR111WEST CORNER OF SAID LOT =
THENCE S88*48'Z"E ALONG THE NORTH LINKOF SAM LOT L94.92 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BBGDRGNG;
THENCE S01*11'35"W IS4.98 FEET, -
THENCE S88044115'!E 251.57 FEE1 TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF U.S. HIGHWAY 99;
THENCE N26*12'46-E ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 17126 FEEr TO THE NORTH LINE
OFSAIDLOT21;
THENCE N88"48'25"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAM LOTS 324.00 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
SUBZCTTO AND TOGETHERWTIH ANEASEMENT FORINGRESS AND EGRESS DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORM OF SAID LOT 22,
THENCE SOD*16'25'V ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT213.76 FEET,
THENCE S88044*35"E 137.04 FEEI
THENCE N01`11'35"E 59.01 FEET;
THENCE S38*44' 137E 196.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS EASEMENT,
THENCE, N26012'46M PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF U.S. HIGHWAY 99 A
DISTANCE OF 22.50 FEEP
THENCE S88*44'1 5"E 70.00 FEET TO TEE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID InUGHWAY:
THENCE S26012467S ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN45.00 FMT,
THENCE N63047'14"W 48.36 FEEI TO APOINT LYING S88044'15"E A DISTANCE OF 16.66 FEET
FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE N88*44' 15-W 16.66 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PROPOSED "LOTI C" LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS 21 AND 22, SOLNER'S FIVE ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 7 OF PLATS, PAGE 25. RECORDS OF TIM
AUDITOR OF THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGLN74INGAT THEA NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAM LOT 221;
I A=ENCE S98049'2557E ALONG T14E VORT14 LINE Of: SAID LOT 154.92 FEET,
THENCE S01*11'35-W 154.99 FEET;
TI-M.NCE N88*44* 15-W 14.45 FEET,
Current Map
.. . .. . ... ..
All,
BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER GOODRICK TO
RECOMMEND TO THE HEARING EXAMINER THAT ADB-98-54 BE APPROVED WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: THAT PANOFLEX MATERIAL, WITH A MATTE, NON -GLARE
FINISH BE USED; AND THE FASCIA BEHIND THE SIGN BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE
BACKGROUND OF THE BUILDING, BECAUSE THE PROPOSED SIGN IS IN KEEPING WITH
THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING AND WITH THESE MODIFICATIONS, THE
APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
OTHER ADOPTED CITY POLICIES, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING
.4 yi
ORDINANCE AND SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION CARRIED.
Lu�
.0
LO U.
10
ADII-19744, PROPOSED NEW GAS STATION, CAR WASH, CONVENIENCE STORE, AND
DRIVE -UP COFFEE STAND
Tim Fliesher
gj
Kirtley Cole
21420 Highway 99
Z
(To be continued)
Z
Bissell explained the applicant requested this agenda item be continued until the Architectural
Uj Uj!
'John
Design Board meeting scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on July 1, 1998, to be held at the Plaza Meeting Room,
5 Oi
650 Main Street, Edmonds, to allow additional time for modifications to be made in their proposal
0
materials.
LU Uj�
3:
BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER CHALUPNM TO
�L- 0
Z
CONTINUE ADB-97-94 UNTIL THE JULY 1, 1998 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
MEETING, SCHEDULED FOR 7:00 P.M. AT THE PLAZA MEETING ROOM, 650 MAIN
W U)�
U 3:1
STREET, EDMONDS. MOTION CARRIED.
0
Z
ADB-98-60 PROPOSED NEW FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AND NEW SIGN
McDonalds
21420 Highway 99
Patricia Tisdale and Jerry Kesselring, McDonald's Corporation, 10220 N. E. Points Drive, Kirkland,
WA, the applicant's representatives, were present.
Boardmember Chalupnik disclosed that he worked for the McDonald's Corporation as a consultant
several years ago to do a study on noise at one of their restaurants.
0
Board Chairman Pierce asked if the applicant, any Boardmembers or members of the audience felt that
Boardmember Chalupnik should abstain from participating in the public consideration of this
application.
Boardmember Sullivan suggested that because a quorum was present at the meeting, it might be
appropriate for Boardmember Chalupnik to be excused.
Boardmember Chalupnik was excused from Board consideration of this application.
John Bissell presented the staff report and explained this proposal is for a new fast food restaurant on a
site previously occupied by an auto dealership. The proposal is not exempt from SEPA. The applicant
has submitted an environmental checklist and the City has issued a Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance.
Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 6 June 3, 1998
X
Dayid DeFrank corrected the information presented in the staff report, and stated the sip is made of a
panoflex material with a matte finish, rather than being plastic faced. He explained the applicant
plected this material because it does not cause a glare and the internal illumination is not as bright with
this type of material.
Mr. DeFrank stated this new logo sign would be the only sign on ;.he site and is smaller than the area
allowed. He also pointed out there will be no freestanding sips'on the property and that the fascia
behind the letters will be repainted to match the building.
Boardmember Rubenkonig asked staff to clarify whetherthe City makes any allowance for considering
the variance when the roadway is at a higher elevation than the business.
John Bissell stated the Code does not allow allowances for differences in topography but could be
considered in the variance request review process,.under the special circumstances criteria,
Boardmember Oaklief asked staff about the basis for other sign height variances granted in the area.
Z
Z
Mr. Bissell commented the Hearing Examiner relied heavily on the reviews and recommendations of the
LU W�
ADB when considering previous variance applications.
Cn
Boardmember Goodrick n d that the photograph contained in the application materials indicates a sign
with a slighjly different destign than the one being proposed.
LU Lul
X U
-81
David DeFrank clarified that af some locations, the corporate sign includes highlighted stripes as shown
Z—
in the picture, however, that design is not being proposed for the Edmonds location.
t,
8 X
Boardmember Chalupnik complimented the applicant for proposing a sign that is smaller in area than is
z
-
allowed, but expressed concern about it exceeding the sign height. Because there are other over height
signs in the area, he could not deny this proposal on that basis alone, however.
There were no audience comments on this proposal.
Boardmember Goodrick agreed with the comments made by Boardmember Chalupnik.
Boardmember Oaklief stated the proposal meets the City's criteria because there are mitigating factors in
that the sign:is located far away from the roadway. He commented that he is in favor of recommending
this proposal for approval by the Hearing Examiner.
0 ; I I I
Boardmember Rubenkonig agreed and commented that the motion should also include the specific
materials to be used and that the fascia will be repainted to match the background. She pointed out this
new proposed sign is more in keeping with ECDC Section 15.15.030.B.5.b which states that signs should
be kept simple and rely on symbols to avoid clutter when possible.
Boardmember Sullivan stated the proposed sign fits the architecture of the building. and is an
improvement over the existing signage. He also clarified with staff that additional ADB approval would
not be required if the applicant submitted a specific color for the necessary background painting for
jg— consideration, as long as the color did not require a significant change.
John Bissell agreed.
Architectund Design Board Meeting Page 5 June3,1998
and espresso building. The proposal also indicates a site plan for a new fast food restaurant to be located
on the same property. The fast food restaurant has been submitted as a separate application, and will be
reviewed as ADB-98-60. Both proposals are located on the property currently addressed as 21420
Highway 99, and previously occupied by Alan BMW. The site is located on the west site of Highway 99
north of 2 1 Oh Street Southwest.
D. Background:
1. Zoning: The property is zoned General Commercial (CG) which allows the proposed use.
2. Environmental Review: The proposal is not exempt from the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA). The applicant has submitted an environmental checklist. The City has issued a
Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. Therefore, the City and the applicant have complied
with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act.
3. Issues: The applicant has addressed the design of the building, site, and landscaping in their
proposal, and the Architectural Design Board must determine the appro riateness of the proposal,
p
E. Staff Analysis:
1. Building Design: The applicant has proposed four buildings: a small drive -up espresso booth,
a convenience store, an automated, drive through car wash and a gas pump island canopy. The
convenience store, the espresso sales booth and the gas pump island canopy have a flat roof with a
metal fascia band with an illuminated reveal below the fascia. The gas pump island has no walls,
while the convenience store and the espresso sales booth use Dryvit siding with anodized aluminum
framed store front type windows.
The drive -through car wash uses a standing seam pitched hip end roof with and C.M.U. block
walls. The car wash building also uses anodized aluminum framed store front typewindows.
b) Lighting:
The applicant has proposed internally illuminated signage for the convenience store and the gas
pump island canopy. The applicant has also proposed seven light standards throughout the site.
In addition, lighting will be provided for the gas -pump area beneath the proposed canopy. The
ADD-97-94
applicant has not provided photornetrics plan to indicate light spill on adjacent properties and
on the does not indicate off -site light spillage. The applicant should indicate the extent of the
off site light spillage at the time of the hearing.
C) Colors:
<
The applicant has proposed gray for the body of the buildings with illuminated yellow trim.
d) Signing:
The applicant has proposed internally illuminated signs for the gas pump island canopy, for the
gas pumps, and for the convenience store. The information submitted by the applicant indicates
to Lul
that the canopy signs will exceed the allowable height limit, and that the convenience store sign
(n
will meet the allowable height limit. The applicant has not provided sufficient information to
determine compliance with the area requirements for the wall mounted signs; however it is
W
likely that the proposal meets the maximum sign area standards. Because the proposed gas
pump island sign is to be over height, staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed
signage contingent upon the application and approval of a variance for sign height.
U.
CI
U)
It should also be noted that the applicant has not proposed a freestanding sign, or a gas pricing
z i—
z i—
z
sign. Since most gas stations provide that type of signage, the applicant should be aware that
freestanding signs must be approved by the ADB prior to the application for a sign permit.
M W!
2. Site Design:
01
a) Access / Parking:
0,
0
The applicant has proposed vehicle and pedestrian access from Highway 99, and from 72d
01—
Avenue West via the proposed fast food development. The provided site plan and landscape
W W
X
plan do not indicate any pedestrian access separate from the vehicle access. However, the
building elevations for the espresso booth indicate a walk-up window and employee entry on
U_ 0
z
the east side of that building. Therefore, the site plan should be modified to allow for entry to
the espresso both without destruction of the landscaping.
0
b) Landscaping:
z
The applicant has proposed a wide variety of landscaping throughout the site that includes
ground cover, lawn, shrubs and trees. The proposed landscaping appears to meet the minimum
standards for buffering, except on the north and south sides of the proposed espresso booth.
That building indicates asphalt to the edge of the building. A five-foot buffer is required by
ECDC section 20.12 at the perimeter of all parking lots.
3. Technical Review:
a) Engineering Division
0 Curbing is required to separate paving areas from landscaped areas.
0 Parking plan will be required to meet the requirements of the ECDC.
0 The project must comply with storm water quality and quantity requirements per
Ordinance 3013.
Pole mounted transformers are not allowed. Provisions for power transformer must be
made.
The site plan for this proposal and that presented in ADB-98-60 differ in several items
relating to ADB-98-60. Those items must be resolved to create a site development that
conforms to the requirements of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
A site plan that has been stamped by a Professional Engineer must be submitted and
approved by the City Engineer prior to building permit issuance.
Civil Engineered Drawings must match the architectural drawings.
2
.0'a
A�8-97-94
b) Building Division
• Compliance with the ADA requirements must be met.
• Civil Engineered Drawings must match.the architectural drawings.
Z, F. Compliance with criteria: In order for the ADB to approve this item, the Board must make the
following findings:
1. That the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city policies.
14 U1
q 2. That the staff has found that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance,
V) 01
Cn LU or the city has approved a variance or a modification under the zoning ordinance.
21 X1
The following table is an analysis of the bulk standard requirements of the zoning ordinance:
Cn W
UJ 0 Allowed Proposed
Building Height 45 feet @ 16 feet
LL Lot Coverage No limitation
Setbacks 15' foot street 15' foot street
X Parking Stalls 16 28
Z
0
3. That the proposal as approved or conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes
UJ LU!
ECDC section 20.10, ADB Criteria, ECDC section 20.12, landscaping, and ECDC section
M 20.60, sign code.
0
0 t ECDC 20.10.070 states that all elements of building design should form an integrated
LU UJI
development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. Building elements include all exterior
elements and colors. The Board may have concerns about this issue since the proposed car
wash building appears to be of a different style and materials that the other buildings
proposed with this project.
ECDC section 20.12.025 requires a five-foot landscape buffer surrounding all parking lot
perimeters. Such landscaping is not provided on the north or south side of the proposed
espresso booth.
ECDC section 20.60 limits the height of wall mounted signs to 14 feet. Since the ceiling of the
proposed canopy will be approximately 14 feet, the proposed sign will be located at a height
greater than 14 feet.
G. Summary:
1. As proposed the project appears: to be consistent with the requirements of the Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The proposal is consistent with the bulk standard and use requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The proposal can be conditioned to be consistent with the requirements of the crit eria of ECDC
sections 20.10, 20.12 and 20.60.
H. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this application with the following conditions:
I . The applicant is to extend the proposed street landscaping to the southwest an
d northwest comers
of the proposed espresso booth in a shape which conforms to the required drive aisle and stacking
lane patterns for the uses proposed on the site.
3
Notice of Development
Name of Applicant:... Kidley Cole
Date of Application: July 9, 1997
Date Application
Complete:.. ..................... May 20, 1998
cation & Architectural Design Board Hearing
oflNotice: May20,1998
File # ADB-97-94
Project Location: ............ 21410, 21412, 21414 Highway 99 Requi d Studies related
I to the rerni—t- Unknown
Project Description:,., A new gas station with 6 fi
pumps, one 20,000 gallon
underground fuel storage 1
2000 sq. ft. convenience a
sq. ft. espresso stand, & 1
car wash with 23 associat
parking stalls
Pubi
1 01 Date: June 3, 199s Time: 7:00 P-. M''.
information on this development application can h
. 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. (,
Warning! no
nisonment
jJ
N-
RECEIVED
2 8 1998
Affidavit of Pu6ic6tion EDMONDS CITY CLERK
z
STATE Or WASHINGTON,
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH,
The undersigned, bemg first duly sworn on oath deposes and says
Vj LU that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper
W printed and published in the City of -Everett, County of Snohomish,
I Ack. I el
ff n
% OL State of Wasb�ington; that said newspaper is a newspa
U. per of
and
0 '-dam 0413 fe. I
w 01 COV
0 ,4
4. general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper
f, has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
rd
S 0 4
U." ex Court of Snohomisl County and that the notice ........................................
33x!:
I 'COPI. Design Board Public Hearing. Development Application
:C Iff
................
...... ...............
z I-
0
McDonald's
.............................. 11 ...... I ......................... ........... ........................... .............................
LU UJI
ADB-98-60
�j?jeet No. :1
U ............... I ....... ................................................................................................
ac
0 4004*-,
a t a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said
uW"j ja newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and
entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely:
F* May 20, 1998
................................... ................................................................................................
rM
......... ..
0
z............................... .....
that d news aper was r distribu to its subscribers
duft, an of a d od.
............... .. .. .. ... . .... ............................
cipal Clerk
20th
this ...................... . ....
I f Subs�ribed and sworn to be I fore me
may 0
98
....... ...... .... ...
0
a for th tate of gton,
residing at Everett, Snobo h Cc
fee.
J. Atp
0 Z_
Ay Va.
OF*F
gp
W Orvicas Vepmvmene
81-udInar-Manaftiat-unalasominx
112 1 -Nth -*--onus 'Nammeft m 2nd r1oor
WAh V0020
142-6) 771-02 f42 1 6)771
20 -0221
m-. AM
THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
WAS SENT
COUNT
# 3
*** SEND ***
NO
REMOTE STATION I.-D.-
START TIME
L
DURATION
I
#PAGES
I
COMMENT
I
11
234587
5-18-98 2:35PM
2- 3V
3
TOTAL 0:02'38"
t� r-
LU L1W
W U
LU a
z
CQr of Edmonds
Community Services Department
Building-Pilanning-Engineering
121-Sth Avenue North 0 2nd Floor
Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: (426) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-0221
FAX COVER PAGE
To: Laressa Knowles
From: Sharla Graham
Herald Legals
Planning
Date Transmitted: .5/18/98 1 No. Of Pages: 3
(including cover page.)
Reciplenes Fax No.:
Facsimile Equipment: Automatic/Group H (2,3 mins.); Groupml.
If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incom I plate, please
call (206) 771-0220 and ask for: Sharla
Re:
4- (p
A Q 13-1 -7 - q 14
to v
Z
Uj
.0
0
LLJ
LU
-j
Ln LL
0
LU
LL
:C
z I--
1.- 0
Z 1--
LIJ LU
0-1
LU UJI
3: LY
�- r-
YZ 0
z
L Li U)
y
0
z
X
-APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE,: `.:ADJ3-97-94
AND CHECKLIST FROW� PLANNING
*PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? C/
v f
*COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED
*Additional, Information Required for Complete Application
sk,
*Additional Studies Required to Complete Review
KANNING DEPT.
• Owner Kirtley Cole
• PropertyAddress 21420HIghway99
• Date of Application 6/22/98 (Re-sibmitted imaterlalsj��
• Type New Gas Station
• Hearing Required: Yes X Nq ---- L
Date of 'Hearing'(11' l(nown
-Application
-Site Plan for Shor[Subdivision (8.5 x 11)
Fee
X Site, Plan (11 x 1
APO List
---Ljegals (EAsting & Proposed)
Title Report
Vicinity Map .--__Proof
of .2-Year Occupancy (ADU)
Elevations
Declare tions(Varianco
Petition (Official Street Map)
EnVironmental Checklist
Critical Areas Determination
�9
�Z-
LLI
.0 U
0
W
�u X
�n LL
0
W
U- <
Lu.
z
1- 0
Z �-
LU LU
0 cn,
0-1
C3 �-j
Uj LLJ�
�L- 0
z
LU U)
z
LIE
-APPLICATION ROUTING FORM
FILE:, ADB-97-94
AND CHECKLIST
FROW PLANNING'
RECEIVED
JUN 3 0 1983
ROUTED TO:
�RETURNED
ERING
gw
Engineering
'Fire 6/30/98
Fi
Public'Works 6/30/98
Public, Works
Parks 81 Rec.- 6/30/98
Parks ez Rec.
JUL 1 3 11998
Staff Comments: P;Qz&7C 7D
Fl-Aiut� ii DEpT.
Fox S- 17.6 - 4 4 P4T&-ZD
*P ER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE?
,*COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *f
60 w, fvfs -%4 1 %),,A;kc�
*Additional Information Required for Complete Application i9
*Additional Studies Required to Complete Reviek
rghr--1-44
• Owner Kirtley Cole
• Property Address 21420 Highway 99
• Date of Application 6/22/98 (Re -submitted materials!
• Type -New Gas Station
• Hearing Required: Yes X No
Date of Hearing (if known)
Application
______,Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11)
Fee
ite Plan (I I x 17)
APO List
Legals (EAsting 4 Proposed)
Title Report
Environmental Assessment
Vicinity Map
Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU)
Elevations
---L-.�-Declarations (Variance),
Petition (Official Street Map)
Environmental Checklist
Critical Areas Determination
OWN
1#71
-'..�.�.":'ROUT�D T6
,nn,F
EngmeL
6130/08'�
EfijI en
X-t
'6/30/98
Wort
C.:
6130/08 �LLLL�,
mefits
p E R ''taj N A' T SSI ES (C� T H(D)TE"'I" 'o af-, Tf E�;] 1" c a F)) F,
1z r
Mi CXDD'i 511 ED E�'
r i� Al V
C, Va ,matt 7 ii 11 E,
Inkrmation' Re 'ir0d,f6rCo�iol'bt��Apo!ic�tion'
qu
w -
'X
'dd"i' : I'S
i0ona tudiesReQLke'drqfo'C mplete Revie
OW �e
ev
- 6 e
r ki ftl C
21400 Ig
A plitaf 6/2-1/9 mitte mAteria S!
te of� A -sub
Tybe New Ga.�:Stavon,
ne
ng jle4u1reid:_:XesL, X
.Head Prri ojvn
I' aVonr,,.
A rt Si4tidiOrici
Iji) it;
�-Year',O'c pa�no
A
0
z
01
The Engineering Division has reviewed the application. The following comments
LU W
apply:
1 - The applicant must meet stormwater requirements per Ordinance 3013.
0-
i
2. A site plan prepared by and signed by a Professional Engineer licensed by the
W W
X U,
State of Washington must be approved for construction by the City Engineer.
3. The Public Works Division and the Wastewater Treatment Plant will have comments
z
LU
regarding provision of services to the car wash.
U
4. The proposed "compact" parking on the highway frontage is not allowed. Edmonds'
z
standard size stall (8.5'x 16.5') should be used.
5. The westerly access to the car wash must have a minimum width of 14'frorn face of
curb to face of curb.
6. The access way on the west side of the property onto 72nd Ave. W. will require a
high traffic load driveway together with the construction of sidewalks, curbs, and
gutters.
7. Traffic mitigation in the amount of $4,572.54 must be paid at the time of building
permit issuance.
0'.
The Engineering Division reserves the right to make additional comments and
requirements on forthcoming submittals for this project. The applicant will need to
comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application is complete as
submitted.
4),
UIT OF EDMONDS
�0
ENGINEERING DIVISION
701b.doc
LU (0
R
z
Q
0
0
U1
LL
d;
U
8
z
1:01
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) M-0220
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNMCANCE
Description of proposal: Construction of the following two-phase project on the subject lot:
Phase 1 A new gas station with six fuel pumps, one 20,000 gallon underground fuel storage tank, on
10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tank, a 2,000 square foot convenience store, a 200 squar
foot espresso stand and a 1,700 square foot car wash, with 23 associated parking stalb
Construction will also require the excavation of 600 cubic yards of material for the installation c
the proposed fuel tanks.
Phase 2 A new 3,348 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive through and 37 associated parkin
stalls.
(City of Edmonds File No. ADB-97-94).
Proponent: Kirtley Cole, P.O. Box 1179, Snohomish, WA 98291
Jerry Kesselring/Patricia Tinsdale/McDonalds, 10220 NE Points Drive, STE 300, Kirkland, Wi
98033
Location of proposal, including street address if any: 21410, 21412, 21414 Highway 99.
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
9
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
enviromnent. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will ot fct on this proposal for 15 days from
the date below. Comments must be submitted by 1998.
Responsible Officiahleffrev S. Wilson
Position/Tifle: Planning Supervisor, Department of Conummity Services - Planning Division
Phone: 771-0220
Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Date: I/ - 7_4 — Signature:
XX You may appeal this determination to R�beft//Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North,
Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than 1998, by filing a written appeal citing the
reasons.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the
procedures for SEPA appeals.
XX Posted on 'i /Z q 1998, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services
Building, and thJ Edmonds Post Office.
XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist.
Page I of 2
4WIMSEPA
Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist:
XX Environmental Review Section XX Kir�ey Cole
Department of Ecology P.O. Box 1179'
P.O. Box 47703 Snohoniish, WA 98291
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
XX i6rry Kesselring
XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation McDonalds
TSM&P/Land Developer 10210 NE Points Drive
15700 Dayton Avenue North STE 300, Kirkland, WA 98033
Seattle, WA 98133
XX Patricia Thisdale
XX Community Transit Mcbonaids,
n
Arm.: Brent Russell 10220 NE Points Drive
1133 164th Street Southwest, #200
STE jOO, Kirkland, WA98033
Lynnwood, WA 98037
n U.
—0
.0
X,
XX MITIGATING MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL:
z
0
THE, APPLICANT IS REQUIRED To CONTRIBUTE A TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE OF $4,572.54
FOR PHASE I OF THE PROJECT
AS DESCRIBED ABOVE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT To
Lu� Lul
HIGHWAY 99 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE OCCUPANCY PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED
5
BUILDINGS.
0
0:
2. THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED 70 CONTRIBUTE A TRAFFIC MMGA71ON FEE OF $8,904.42
W Ui
FOR PHASE 2 OF THE PROJECT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT To
I..
HIGHWAY 99 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE E
PROPOS D
U� 01
BUILDING.
Attachments
pc: File No. ADB-97-94
SEPA Notebook
W�
Piip2of2
4J27)9&SEPA
ov ED
MEMORANDUM
LU
cc 21
ni
0:
Date: April 24,1998
Lui
LU
To: File No. ADB-97-94
-J
in U61
LU 0
From: John Bissell, Senior Planner
LL <
Via: Jeffrey S. Wilson, Responsible Official
Cn
Environmental determination for construction of the following two phase
Subject:
project on the subject lot:
Z
0;
Phase I A new gas station with six fuel pumps, one 20,000 gallon
z
underground fuel storage tank, one 10,000 gallon underground
UJ W!
fuel storage tank, a 2,000 square foot convenience store, a 200
square foot espresso stand and a 1,700 square foot car wash,
0 LO
with 23 associated parking stalls. Construction will also
a L;
require the excavation of 600 cubic yards of material for the
UJ
installation of the proposed fuel tanks.
U. C)
Phase 2 A new 3,348 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive
z
through and 37 associated parking stalls.
File No. ADB-97-94
z
I have had the opportunity to visit the site, review the environmental checklist, site plan,
landscape plan, building elevations, and traffic study which have been prepared for the project.
Copies of these documents are filed in the official file for this permit.
Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recominefid
that a mitigated determination of nonsignificance be issued for the project.
A traffic study prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc dated November 9, 1997
o
for Phase I has revealed an impact to the level of service of Highway 99. The applicant has
calculated the subject project share of improvements to be $4,572.54. The City of Edmonds
Engineering Division has evaluated the traffic study and concurs with the calculations presented
by the traffic study.
H
A traffic study prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc dated January 8, 1998,
for Phase 2 has revealed an impact to the level of service of the intersection of Highway 99. The
applicant has calculated the subject project share of improvements to be $8,904.42. The City of,
Edmonds Engineering Division has evaluated the traffic study and concurs with the calculations
presented by the traffic study.
ADB97948MOC
04128198.
City of Edmonds cza Planning Division
/7
Based on my review of all information and adopted policies of the City, I am recommending that
the proposal be changed or clarified to include the following mitigating measures so that a
Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) can be issued.
E
Recommended Mitigation Measures:
r
I . The Applicant is required to contribute a traffic mitigation fee of $4,572.54 for phase I of
the project as described above for the improvement to Hi way 99 prior to the issuance of
gh
the occupancy permits for the proposed buildings
LUWUJ
2. The Applicant is required to contribute a traffic mitigation fee of $8,904.42 for phase 2 of
A U.
the project as described above for the improvement to Highway 99 prior to the issuance of
0
an occupancy permit for the proposed building.
:3
This recommendation is based on adopted policies of the City as found in the Edmonds
M
Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the following apply:
Polley The City of Edmonds Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan
z I —I
discusses Level Of Service in Chapter 2. Page:32, of Edmonds Transportation
Element states that "Edmonds Artefials will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) of
D or better."
These policies directly support the above mentioned: mitigation measures and require these
0
measures in order to fully mitigate the impacts created by the proposal. Should you have any
LU
questions concerning the information in this memorandum, please contact me.
LUL.
UJ
Review by Responsible Official
U
concur:
z
I do not concur:
Comments:
Jeffr4 S. Wilson Date,
Attachments
Page 2 bf 2
ADN"ODW
OWNS.
state Of
wa*tvon
(� r-P,;
vq-t-nt
OfEcology
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist: COIJIVTER
7he State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all govemmemal agencies to consider the
environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared
for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment 7he purpose of this checklist
is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impactsfrom your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts
from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency deckle whether an EIS is required,
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about yourproposal. Governmental agencies use
this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of yourproposal are significant, requiring preparation of an
ElS. Answer the questions briej7y, with the mostprecise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best ofyour knowledge. Inmost cases, you should be able
to answer the questionsfrom your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. Ifyou really do not
know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposA write "do not know" or "does not qpply'� Complete
answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these
questions if you can. Ifyou have problems, the govemmental agencies can assistyou.
The checklist question apply to all parts of your prop=4 even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different
parcelsofland. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information
reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts.
Use of check list for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklistfor nonproject proposals, even though questions may he answered "does not cpp�y. IN ADDIZ60N,
complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECTAC77ONS (pan D).
For nonproject actions, the r*rences in the checklist to the words '�prcjea 11 "applicant, " and '�prvpen*y or site" should be
read as '�proposal, "'�prqposer, "and "aftectedgeographic arei4 "respectively.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
McDonald's Restaurant
2. Name of Applicant:
McDonald's Corporation
PROJECTNO, Page 1 SFPA.DOC
-7
a
V, I:
i" Z
................
11,
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC. QIT FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
3.
Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Jerry Kesselring - Construction Project Manager 10220 NE Points Drive, Ste. 300
Patricia Tisdale - Real Estate Representative Kirkbndi WA 98033
(425) 827-9700
4.
Date checklist prepared:
February 27,1998
5.
Agency:requesting checklist:
City of Edmonds, WA
6.
Proposed timing or schedule .(including phasing, if applicable);
4-6 months for permitting, 100 days for construction (STAFF
COMMENTS)
7.
Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion', or further activity related
to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No, not at this time.
(STAFF COMMFMS)
8.
List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or
will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Geotechnical Investigation
Phase I and Phase H
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9.
Do you know whether applications are pending for. governmental approvals of
other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
Proposed lot to north has applied for a Shell Gas Station, convenience store
and car wash. Both lots will share ingress, egress.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
/7'
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page.
It is proposed that the site be developed with a McDonald's Restaurant
Said restaurant will contain approximately 3348 s.f. and will have a drive-
thru window. The site will have approximately 33 parking stalls.
Lot size - 33,055 s.f.
(STAFF COMIVIENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any,
and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a
range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are
not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist.
The former Alan BMW lot at 21420 Hwy 99
(STAFF COMMENTS)
B. ENVIRPNME EMP
___JUAL EL NTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site: (circleone)
(FlaZ�olling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
NSTAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
2%
(STAFFCOMNEENTS)
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classificatioti of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Not known at this time.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
�,g
PROJECTNO. Page 3
SEPA.DOC
R"�
(77A
TO BE COMPLETED
BY APPLIS FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
d,
Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity: If so, describe.
No
(STAFF COUNIENTS)
e.
Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling.or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
None
(STAFF COMMENTS)
L
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
No
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
90%
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
h.
Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,
if any:
1. 0 J 0 per ty standards.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would results from the proposal (i.e., dus4
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
That which Is normally associated with and caused by building
constmetion activity.
(STAFF C0MMEN`rS)
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposals? If so, generally describe.
SR"
(STAFF COMMENTS)
PROJECTNO. Page 4 SEPAMOC
:� ".:2
, �i - , . �
TO BE. COMPLETED BY APPLICANT FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
c. Proposed measure to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to, air� if
any:
Watering to control dust, if necessary.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
U 3.. Water
UAII a., Surface
A U. 1 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity ofthe site
—0
Ai (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes. ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. Happropriate, state
13 what stream or river it flows into.
a C3
No.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
z In
LU W, 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available
u tA
0— plans.
UJ No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
U.
z
W� Lai
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
z that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5) Does the proposal He within a 1MYearfloodplain? If so, note loc;tton
on the site plan..
No
(STAFF COMMENTS)
SEPA.DoCr
PROJECTNO.
Page 51
04
7 IN1011 Mm"00- a
. .. .. .. . ..... %
<
�W' "lei
L
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC9 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
.0 U!
b. Grou
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if
V) known.
—0
LU
No.
L LL (STAFF COMMENTS)
L
Ln cas
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharge into the ground from
z septic mks or other sources, if any (for example, domestic sewage,;
oil
1-1� , industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.).
LU Lwk
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
0— humans the systems(s) are expected to serve.
a LU
r U.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Z,
ii
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
z
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? Uso, describe.
Storm Drainage System will be designed per city requirements.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters If so geWei7diy—
describe,
No
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters: If so, generally
describe,
No.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Storm &Wmge system will be designed and installed per City
PROJECTNO. Page 6
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
requirements.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: NIA
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir cedar, pine, other
shrubstbrush
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, celgrass, milfbil, other
—other types of vegetation/brush,
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
N/A
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NIA
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Landscaped area shall be developed per city requirements.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near die site:
hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
—mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
—fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
b. List any thicatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NIA
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
PROJECT NO. Page 7 SEPA.DOC
�l
LAJ
LU
L)
8
z
Z,
us I
LL
Z
A0%, /7\
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any: Does not apply.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
2) What types and level of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Only that which Is normaly associated with construction 8-5,,and the
operation of a McDonald's Restaurant 6-12.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties:
Car Dealer, Canopy Dealer to North and South. Current site is old car,
dealer lot
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
c. Describe any structures on the site.
3000+/- frame building.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? U so, describe.
Yes, all.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
PROJECTNO. Page 9
(STAFF CONMENTS)
g
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program de�sigriation of the
site? N/A.
(STAMCOMMUNTS)
h.
Has any part of the site been classified as an "enviro ly, !vea?
nmentai sensitive
If so, specify. No.
(STAFF CONMENTS)
!-7-
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project? 60 employees
(STAFF
COUMENTS
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
(STAFFCOMMEqTS)
k.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement hinpacti, if any:,
MA.
(STAFFICONNENTS)
1.
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
N(A
(STAFF COMWMNTS)
PROJECTNO. age� 10 SEPADOC�
I OnTO BE,COMPLETED
BY Alikicf.-41
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
11. Ught and Glare
a. What type of light or glam will the proposals produce?, What time of day
would it mainly occur? Parking lot and security lights dusktod.iwn.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views? No.
W W
(STAFF
X,
CON04ENTS
It
LU
c. , What existing off-s it r sources of light or glare may affect your p osal?
r0p
Business to South, North, and EasL
5,
(STAFF
�J'
COMMENTS)
Z
0
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Ui W!
Lot fighting is designed to retain light on site.
(STAFF
COMMENTS)
0
a t
LU Us
12.. Recreation
0
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities am the
—in, imrne�fijte:
�Z
vicinity: None.
0
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
Z
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe. No.
Control ificla� Ing
c. Proposed memo= to reduce or impacts on recreation' I
L
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant; if any:
N/A.
0
(STA" COMMENTS)
page
PROJECTNO. 12
SEPADOC
M
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
13. Iffistoric and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe. No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Cf -�k
Ln
21 b. Generally describe any landnwks or evidence of historic archaeological,
-J scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
V) LL
—0 None.
LU -
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
. ... ....
X uj�
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impact, if any.
z Does not apply.
OR (STAFFCOMMENTS)
UMJ
0
W LU , 14. Transportation
t--; a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
z access to the existing street system. Show on site plans if any. SR 99- shared
UJ curb cut and right out only. 2 - way ingresslegres to 72nd Ave West.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
z
b. Is site currently served by the public transit: If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, 200-300 feet.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would die project eliminate: 37- NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Ifso, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private). No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
V
'r. tlli�
g
PROJECTNO. Page 13,
EPA-.DdC
............
TO BE COMPLETED FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
BYAPPLWP
c. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water rafl, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. No.
(STAFF COb04ENTS)
'f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
U project? If )mown, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
5
J
33
(STAFF
LU
.J F— C
V) U.
—0
UJ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
2 �: N(A
U. (STAFFCOMMENTS)
X
01
15. Public Services
LU UJI
:D a. Would the project results in an increased need for public services (for
0— example, fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? ffSo'
generally describe. None.
UJ UJ
X 0 (STAFF
I-- P, COMMENTS)
L J.
L
0 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public service, if
z any. NIA
(STAFF COMMENTS)
16 . Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, iiatural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, SimltM SeW6r,
septic system, other:
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing
the service, and the general construction activities on the site or irithe
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
C. S
PROJECTNO. Page 14
SEPA.DOC
'To BE CONTLETED BY APPLICANT F6R AGENCY USE ONLY
5. HOW would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including
whether it'would allow or encourage land or, shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts ary
�,6. Ho%� would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
LL
services and, utilities?
M,
a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
0
7. Identify, if possible, Whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal
i Lu,
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment
0
k'�
S�z
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govern mental approvah of other proposals
directly related to this proposal.
None.
z
............
(Staff Comment)
01
U 01
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
J.UZ
UJ
City of Edmonds - Commercial Building Permit, Plumbing, Mechanical, P/W
Ln LL
D.O.E.-Tank Installation
uJ 0
Puget Sound Air- Vapor Recover Permit
Dept Of Labor & Industries - Electrical
U.
M
Uji
(Staff Comment)
z
01
Lu uj�
2 :D1
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain
aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those an er on this page ad agencies may
sw s (Le
0
modify this form to Include additional specific information on project description).
Construct a 1,950 square foot C-store, Shell Silverado canopy for 6 fueling dispensers. Install (1)
�L- 01
20,000 gallon underground storage tank & (1) 10,000 gallon underground storage tank(UST's) which will
z!
be holding petroleum. Install new landscaping. Construct new carwash facility
with vacuum islands
X1
(Staff Comment)
z
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address If any, and section, township,
and range, if known. If a proposal v
,rould occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site p an,
I vicinity Map, and topographic map, if
IrT,
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agencyt you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
A
Please see attached vicinity map, legal description and tax ID number. Site is located north
of
216'h street and Highway 99
(Staff Comment)
&
-1 1111011-
. .. . .... . . .... . ...
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one) -
Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
(Staff Comment)
A
jo
UJI
J
D b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) I ?
.0
Less than 5%
(Staff Comment)'
z �M!
LU Lul
21, c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay,
:2 sand, gravel, peat, mucky)If you know the classification of
A ngricultural soils specify them and note any prime farmland?
Uj W
X 0, Sandy soil
LL- (Staff Comment)
z
LU
U
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable.soffs in the
immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
(Staff Comment)
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or &ading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Remove 600 cubic yards of soil and replace with pea gravel and
tanks for fuel excavation.
(Staff Comment)
nm r-MVzM-ww-