The URL can be used to link to this page

21501 80TH AVE W.PDF111111111111 7183 21501 80TH AVE W ADDRESS: &116291 �5-v-wu TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: C!� —,7 !�W BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS: 1�9 DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver E] Study Required /kWaiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DA PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: ��- 1 o / 014 LID #: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: LATEMP\DSrs\Forms\Street File Cheeklist.doc 0 40 RETURN ADDRESS: Clity of Edmonds, Clity Clerk 121 5tb Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 lj,� -e 2oo 3o-f 2s-000 Z DECLARATION OF RESTRICTn7E COVENANT MULTI -FAMILY RE SIDENTIAL g,"� ZX "&) Reference#: v00%�"aa Granlor(s): (2; Additional on pol. Gr2niee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec 30 Twn 2-1 Rng ILE,-3,SA- Qtr IC -- OR Lot Block P121 Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) (2) Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned WDEREAS: i sg=�� are the owners of The following described real estate in the City of Ed b monds, to Nvit: -ArrsC,rvk Property Address: �N(2 nNAIQ Legal Description: -- Assessor's Tax Parcel ID 4 (s): .>C> AUTBORIZED FOR RECORDINIG City of Edmonds By:�O? —D21L, -5(D3 P2ge Of NVJIEREAS� the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said PrCmiscs in COM02DU With Section 19.00.040 of file Edmonds Community Development Code. NVITNESSETTI, . that for and irl consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and gralrit to tile City of Edmonds as Grantee the fojloNN,ing restrictive cOve"2nt",O_N,,i,: Thai at the iimc Of the Cxeculioll of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the Ordinance of tile City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on subject property containing more than units. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future o-tviners of said real estate and tbeirbeirs, successors and assig ns. DATED this _ 171-M day of 200-2— GRANTOR S12te Of NA'2Shin aton Ics Countv that I kno-*N, or have s2tisfactor ) , — 11 evidence that (is/are) the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) 2eknowledged that (he/she/t b instrument, on oath stated that (he/sbe/lke 1= hey) signed this LS/2re) 2uth orized to ex le the instrument and 2eknowledged it as the 1[ 1' !J. I jZC- Si a r-- 40 (title) of 01 A L (1, #0 0 'I�� to be file free 2nd-volunt2r C _�L� y act of such part3,(jes) for tile uses and purposes mentions in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before t-- d2y of me this 1 -7 L 20.( Notary Public in and for The Sulhf NA-2shington. fit 0.0 IVA AlYcol"Mission expires AUTBORIZED FOR RECORDING City of Edinonds By:Z=Date. g o3 Page --Z— Of -3 � L:\TEhIP\BUILDING\FORI\IS\RESTRJCT Exhibit 'W' .0 Desc otion THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE NORTH 410 FEET OF THE WEST IL30 FEET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE W ' EST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30 _-, �r TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M.; - r__ EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET FOR COUNTRY ROAD KNOWN AS 00TH AVE. WEST; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE�OF WASHINGTON. (PARCEL IE) 11 27-0430-001-067-00) 4K t 0 Z n 0 0 A, - - ,, c W F- YZ DNINNV1d AG C13AOUddV 4 �qr rt 9 '41 jp§111111 qQ1 1 p, gill 11 H I I I kill if I I 111111 =z D 1-0 01 cp too 80th Ave. W mnn,t)j'nn1w 10060-- LNOO"' OIL, + + 4 * 0 C. I L .......... > Y . . ..... EM r I P 21 1313 . .. .... . . ..... .7 an. 13 + (n . . . . . ........... Z .... )..—r ........ .. ....... ... + t R -to 1 7�- 4' to X 0 WOO . NOO*Ot . 00"� 98 f f ).- I RECEIVED STREET FIL JAN 2 4 2003 PERMIT COUNTER u� > i I -", 9 � E9 Magnolia Court'fownhomes 21501 Both A— W. Pd.", WA %026 sing-jilmej architects ps 600 malm stmet, sulte C Edw-'s. WA 98020-3079 425.778.6400 FAX 778.3= DA ZoneG MEA /4, SEC. 30 T27N, RA E.W.M. 156. 100 il C14 1. _4 p0930 — 21002 2100 001 026 2. 1, L01 Re 100 TOR 03 lot UUY Cob I'al IOIS 21012 019 4% R I)OB 1� zlo 16 Ise ;-It 021 allio u > 1110 1 2 1 ku 2 2101.8 10 2ioto 21OLS 2103S JIM 1 13 a 2 2 3— 2JOZ3 2103f 1009 2 Z'02' 1107 2JIJ /0 21104 21103 1114 21105 2110 jef 21103 III(D 21 21111 21118 17 SEVEN N zw2 211oq 2.1117 4— Ir 1120 CIO 21 4w tn . Ii, N 1-1 2—P 07 PT- 10 '\ 21130 Go T ST. W. 212111 S.W 21217 VTO WN , �: '9 z 1 cz, 0 a ra, ;a % 76 0 ?jp OSQUIPE 30 com 0 040S WOODWAY 1221 Z1223 21211, W. ARTS lit 21229 AA -j 213/3 "T 4b q .6 21405 to 4 1311 *oYA1 GY14 STAI.BAW3 IS' TfAAAM cm WAGN stow "P, 40 214ot gJ323 VI&LA 2 14010 14 c 2)409 214/7 a fit 21,q2g TM ST T A Z -.61 ago 21425' V 00 901 J501 ZIIFOT pal co )Ni ST. Mr. 916 16 13 91607 91608 21407 ZI" 60 ('01 21612 21615 ?W4JI 166�� 161f 6116 12 WWI 21 91616 IJ62 3 2162 f#L"m &.SAVO 2 1636 $Mel 217fl 211.25 1 62 21 21GI7 CHASE LAKE' 21704 2)7071 1705 21701 We# 6 pros SC KOOL- Z1708 21709 1, 713 21711 '110 21710 it 721 Zi 7/ 9. 21717 ih 21720 7 1.2 N 2 2J72S- " - &I c� 21725, it A 714 1727 '01 r, 21101 W. 40 ;a 21" W13 all fA It 17 21809 21808 21817' 91897 21812 E1823 13 21919 Isk, 9191, &jem Z1619, glow 82 1 5 gird OD Val on $28 glow 11833 ]&-4121831 .. M91 Itis —Til T 1 11 — A 04 1903 1, XWO 90 91 VTD-3- 1 4 R19 " S7. memo 4908 ago I SPA" Iq 13 pign 10 1* 219/3 219 — ;8 , — L 2191(, 2 1 a 21919. I 4918 21915 16 PJ907 ka qI :09127 21927 1 9Z, -Z 220" ST S. ST W. 211 ku It 005 a um 4 (� > cri M CIO tall 2.012 !20/4 20/6 /9 20/0 P, Z017 Vol! cn o2 OD 2031 0 2023 29ftO -12022 3 ;pto 28 2 029 2926 2 OD urb 0 2103 o-52 220, 0. 0 96 DATE: 11--1- 09-- PLAN CHK#- o a - L4L4 T4 NAME OF BU . ILDING PERMIT, APPLICANT:-�� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ADB FILE #: AC�16 -oa - I �� 3)011 DATE WAIVED: PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: Ll-").1010 SUBDIVISION: LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: REDUCED SITE PLAN (8-5X1 1) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE Plan Review By: 1.2 ........... . c, -C> —V cA>- N r—> cr-- .. . ... ....... ... . C" S-Y-,O+ 4L 'b—>,L%-CQ.I.\Iibml!�^PiandatNewComm.dqc Ev I, Lco :L z PLANNING DATA New Commercial / MultiFamily Prooeds SITEADDRESS: aID01 80-Od- A,,jq ,-D. ZONING: a - L4 USE(S) PROPOSED:_�-�L_zn - EEi2�� to .,�ALLOWED?: �a_� - - LEGAL NONQ27ORMING LAND USE DETEKMINATION ISSUED (Yffl) CUP- File: To Allow What Uses?: ADB FILE. #: <f)-" - 15�b PARKING: Cl , use: No. Spaces Required: . x Lo (floor area,# employees, etc.)= 9- Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = Use: 'No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) Total Required: Actual Provided: SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: .Front: 1 Left Side: ( 0' Right Side: )6 Rear: Actual Setbacks: I Front: I Left Side: 10 Right Side: to Rear: Street map checked for additional setback require �e /No) V-01 MAXIMUM FLOORItREA: Maximum Allowed: LA 15 �/o Actual: 5�c�- U Ce L4 —' I L_j Li BUILDING HE16HT: Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: Modulation Allowed?: ��+ck-,,Modulation Height: Datum Elpvation: 10& Datum PointeEt>e,,, gr, Elevator Penthouse > Sleet over height limit? If so,VAR# LANDSCAPING: Matches ADB approved: A S. I a-,,- Q Bid Provided? - r-to B&Yd Amount (100% bid): CRITICAL AREAS #: cbk- ca- SEPA DETERMINATION: �-kfD k-5,5 I (-o - 0 SHORELINE REQUIRED?: Continued ... . 1Afibmry\^P1andatNewComm.doc 200,th— r I 206thf,, 0 , _60, R" '2 202nd-�--- Z Go V; Z 203rd —0 ley ,6a Spraguo CL Go 10 m 00 CD Ed �j P06 Bell 'R `III q BC �c Dayto OS(I w Dayto , n p 208th Maple M-1 5 jr LgNj J er p i f!" .211 Oth ICG2 — '2 0 M-2 4 CY) �RM- RM-1 t —ui Walnut _77_ K, 2' h M:2,1 eD (�os r , , - : �, . fff Cw A uzr-17 — — Y cc ""2.4" Go p c), R J p Pi RS-6 216th J, IRKA I � W9 MU f — D 2 218th 218th '0 cli CG2 Oth 220th IV Rr: __220th_ U) A. RMT2 4 JL 224tj M 5 _2 'SN RS. -2 26t CY) )C cli 0) m 5 RS�20_ M-2, BN 230 r 61* 7'1 231 st 4 RM 0 8 G -L 220th 208th S RM-1.5 �RM 5 i 00 (D 2 15 RS-8 , - , 11 S. KM:2 fA,7 hA RS-8 RmifiA5- JR.:, '2 th 240t /24R Ftsw!i'iI`0', q* m ls&;�2� 6ll A Revision Date: 1242.d CGZ Qi -1 7/98 0 RM -1.5 Last Change: 18N Misc. Rezones ___L i, 244th L— L —AA-, B' Le . ....... ..... ....... ....... ... c2v o Lk 100. ck a C2 0 0 L4 U 0 5�5 L '(27 le V ED av Ae W1 0 A, C4, 0 IP CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH "ENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Construction of a new multi -family development at 21501 80th Ave. W. The development will consist of two two-story buildings containing six townhomes with an approximate building footprint of 3,375 square feet. There will also be approximately 12 off-street parking spaces provided. Grading for construction will consist of approximately 850 cubic yards. Proponent: George Hanna for Charlie Nathan Location of proposal, including street address if any:, 21501 80th Ave. W. Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and mitigation measures have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21 C.240 and WAC 197-11-158. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by February 6. 2003. Responsible Official: Star Campbell PositionlTitle: Assistant Planner - Planning Division Phone: 425-771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than February 6. 2003, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on January 23, 2003, at theEdmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Page I of 2 SEPA DETERMINATIONMAGN&[A.DOC 1/23/03.SEPA Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Environmental Review Section XX Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX AT&T Broadband Outside P�ant Engineer, North Region 20811 84t Ave. S., Suite 101 Kent, WA 98032 XX Edmonds School District No. 15 Aftn.: Bret Carlstad, Planning and Property Manager 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Applicant: George Hanna for A.D. Shapiro Architects 600 Main St., Suite C Edmonds, WA 98020 XX Property Owner: Charlie Nathan 9792 Edmonds Way, #266 Edmonds, WA 98020 XX MITIGATING MEASURE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL: 1. THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT $800 IN TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEES, BASED ON AN ESTIMATED 4 EVENING PEAK HOUR TRIPS AT $200 / TRIP. Attachments pc: File No. PC-02-444 SEPA Notebook Attachments Page 29f 2 SEPA DETERMINATIONMAGNOLIA. DOC 1/23/03.SEPA 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 PuLpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the city identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and, to help the city decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. City of Edmonds will use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information know, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the city can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The city may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Magnolia Court Town Homes 2. Name of applicant: A.D. Shapiro Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 600 Main Street, suite C Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 778-5400 Attn: Tony Shapiro 4. Date checklist prepared: June 24, 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds 2002 F) CE V E L G P 0TR 0 ENVIR?NMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House PrcJ No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 5/24/2002 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is slated to begin with grading in fall 2002 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This will be a new building. No further addition expected afterfinishing construction. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. There are no wetlands on this site. A geotechnical reportfor our site will be prepared The information will be available then. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NIA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Edmonds as well as other possible agencies will need to review this project. City of Edmonds permits include but are not limited to: Site Development Plan Approval, Storm Drainage review, Civil Construction Permit, Building Permit, Landscape. 1. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This project will consist of two new buildings with a total area of 6,750 SF (footprint area = 3,375 SF Ea.) to be usedfor Housing (2 stories of Town Homes). This will be constructed of woodfirame, with a building height of approximately 25'-0" to 30'-0" using 4:12 sloped roofs (or grater) and will meet all applicable codes. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located one lot to the north of the intersection of 2161h St. SW & 80,h Ave. W ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 Legal description: The South 100feet of the North 410jeet of the West 180feet of the South one-half of the West one-half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W. M.; EXCEPT the West 30feetfor country road known as 8LIh Ave. West; Situate in the City of Edmonds, County of Snohomish, State of Washington. (PARCEL ID # 27-0430-001-067-00) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The Site isflat with one house on the site which will be demolished. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The Site isflat. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils report isforth coming d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None that we are aware of. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Cut & Fill will less than 850 CY f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion will be controlled with appropriate construction practices per the Temporary Erosion Control Plan. 9 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? I Area Area S.F. Overall Site Area 15,000+/- Total footprint 5,200 2 nd Floor 6,750 Impervious Surface Area 10,000 Landscaped Area 5,000 Lot Coverage 45% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An erosion control plan prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington will be preparedfor development of this site. The erosion control plan will contain at a minimum; construction sequences, location of clearing limits, location and construction details forfilterfabric fence, location and construction features of a rock construction entrance and rock staging area. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if know. Minor air pollutionfrom construction activities may occur. In addition, there will be emissions from the automobile traffic of the finished project. It is not expected that there will be any other types of air pollution involved. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?, If so, generally describe. I We do notfeel that there are any off site sources ofpollution that will be problematic to our project. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The building's equipment willfully comply with EPA emission requirements and we will plant the site to provide a natural emission filter. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, lakes, ponds, wetland)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The proposal does not involve any planned discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Soils report pending ground water not anticipated. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. This proposal does not involve the discharge of waste material into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. It will connect with the City Sanitary Sewer main. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The proposed project will generate stormwater runofffrom impervious roof and pavement surfaces. The project will use City of Edmonds regional detention system for both detention andfiltration. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface water? If so, generally describe. Waste materialsfrom accidental spills or discharges will be handled by city filtration system. Refer to the previous answer. 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House PrqJ No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All impervious pavement sur fiaces will be collected and conveyed through an underground wet vault. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation L4 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? r_; , 1 Aq 4 th ; f; L A f ;/I L at IL6 "r& �"P -6 � G� a "6 L/"Jc "" 'Cra VV rz I C; Uvr, A,1-4 F-> I �-k P.Lkc;r /",a�bp2fb — c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site None are known to be on this site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A complete landscape plan showing plant types is provided as a part of this submission. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, sonjzbirds, other: — None mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Small animals such as squirrels and raccoons are assumed to be on or near the site. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. To our knowledge, this is not in a migratory route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: New landscaping will help to reduce impact to the wildlife. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ENVIRINMENTAL CHECKLIST - RPA Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 Electric power will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs, mainly for lighting and running equipment. Natural gas will be usedfor heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, The maximum height of the building on the site is 30'-0 er City of Edinoil-ds Code. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this Proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The building will be designed to comply with the Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chetrticals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no known hazardous conditions related to this proposal. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. The completed proposal would not need any emergency services beyond standard Police, Medical and Fire department services. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are included in this proposal. b. Noise I ) What types of noise exist in the area which may effect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The only anticipated noise pollution would be standard construction noise and automobile traffic that would be related to thefinished project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None at this time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site currently has a single family residence, and is surrounded by a high school and medical office buildings. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing rental house. d. Will any structure be demolished? If so, what? Existing structures will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM 2.4 Multi Family ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 . Proj Np: 12325-00 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Existing zoning is in compliance with theCompPlan g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive' area? If so, specify? None i Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There may be perhaps as many as 12 residents in the finished project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed job displace? Site has a house, therefore the house renter displacement would occur. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: We have conformed to the entire setback, landscape, building height and parking requirements that relate to this zone. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Six housing units will be provided Middle income housing. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether'high, middle, or low- income housing. One. c. Proposed m ' easures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply. 10 Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The building will be constructed o wood siding, Landscaping will be at the street buffer and at the setbacks. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Sensitive architectural design. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? This lighting has not yet been designed, but will be done so in a way that limits off site light spill. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00 21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002, b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, there will not be enough light to cause problems to the surrounding area. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None are known that would be problematic. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Lights that are set close to adjacent properties will be fitted with glare shields in order to reduce impact to others. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? High Schoolfootball and baseballfields are adjacent to the property. c. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Nothing of historical significance on or adjacent to site. b. Generally describe if any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to our site will be the streetfrontage. There is a major access road north of our site, (212"' SW). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is a Community Transit bus stops on 212'h SW to the north. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Twelve +-c�) 0, 9 64� ENVIRolkMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00 21501 80,h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS 6/24/2002 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to existing roa(Ils or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Streetfrontage improvements infront of the property. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. There will be no use of water, rail or air transportation by this project., 9 How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Only those associated with six town homes Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None at this time. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Police and Fire Protection will be impacted due to the fact that the . site currently has (not in business) workshop & a house and we will be adding a six unit building and people that will need standard protection. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, Cable TV, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitM sewer, septic system, other. (All are available). b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The completed project will need: Power service that will be provided through Snohomish County PUD. Water service will be from the City of Edmonds. Gasfrom Puget Sound Energy. Phone, data and cable will befrom the standard providers in the bowl. Garbage service will be provided by Sound Disposal. C. Signature The above answers are true a7d complete to -the best of my knowledge. I understand that the,.City of Edmonds is relying �n t4ero t� mlk� its decision. Signature Date Submitted 10 REC �..7VED CITY OF EDMONDS X. SEPA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALySlgEVELOPI,&�*j S-MVICES WORK SBEET Name of Proposed.Project: aT - AD5-c2-1:55 OwncriApplicant: �,LU16 \iAT4tA,,t,,j Name qV9 2- Z5�6t&!S> 9 Street/Maffing Address 1;Cz)90fJ-0Q vvA '79o26 city State zip Telephone: A 7-,x:S-- -74 / - :72-4 c) Applicant Contact Person: Name zno IVAI:rj -,-T. StreetUailing Address eVLAAD -4!; QUA 99C)efo city State zip Telephone: 4 2- 5 - -7 Z9 - 5-4 0 0 Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis: Firm Name 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Contact Name Telephone a. Street address (if known): _2-150( �50 �5D140,AJ()0;,, VjA 9,8.2(, b. L4)cation:-Tfi-r-- 06&t- AV LC�T TO "�29-0- OF 2A 4 (Attach a vicinity map and siteplan.) c. Specify existing land use: -5;X o(-', d. Specify proposed type and size of development: j5:;,Tpgz%A Tc:,j)o fJ9 -rc, -rAL- AeLr--A -7:5c> sr e. 'Wben will the project begin construction and when will it be completed? --r-,J FA LL- 2,c,,,,)2 f Define proposed access locations: 0 F-IRE Lc,-T �;D,�GJr tk�5 g. Define propowA siglit distance at site egress locations: sT-TC—: Po\tJ CZIQIY -TC, . Page I 00 2. TRIP GENTRATION 00 a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Ptak -Hour Trips IN OUT tj '2 b. PToposed Project Trip Generation Table: — Land Use Daily (ADT) PM J?,eak-Hour Trips IN OUT f- PI - -2 - -1 e5o -1 . 2- e H u t-T-.:,- - F- AN! . L�" "(!5UtJ-,T-S Y2 OTil 'up W 14E -2-:3C) — c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM P-eak-Hour Trips IN OUT Aj&,T Aje, w d. State assumptions and methodology for intemal, link-diveried orpassby trips: Mo4!:g�,"DIT TAMemn) Page 2 .:).\TRIP DISTRIBUTION \Pnepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. 4. SITE 4CCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have �i \ght distance requirements at egress location beeii met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection U'vel of Service Analysis: 0 Existing conditions LOS Delays 0 Year of Opening`\\ \ LOS Delays * Five Yem Beyond Chpoe of Land Use LOS Delays (Intersections to be evaluated �hall be determined by the City ofEdmonds Traffic Engineer.) c. Describe channelization w'an-antk d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis ( • Existing Conditions • Year of Openin g • Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state stop -sign and signal wan -ants: f Summarize local accident history'. and 95 % queuing lengths): (Aftach stripingplan.) 95% 1pa6ge 3 0 0 �' 00 5'. TRAFFIC VOLUMES "� Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, on street adjacent to and \directly impacted by the project. b. Describe�he estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including tuming movements, the year the project is fully open Ci�ith and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimateWT and peak -hour counts, including tuming movements, five years after the project has been fully o ' (with and without project traffic). P7 d. state annual background traffic gro-�rth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and at the following documentation for each arterial street hour trips. other City -planned developments must vxis��: Existing Condition: Year of 3pepigg LOS: With Project: Without Project: 3 supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak- �\be factored into the LOS calculations. Page 4 Note any to standard analysis default values and justifications: 7. NUTIGATION RJECOMAMNDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to project specific traffic impacts. 8. NMMWUM NUTIGATION REQUMEMENTS Residential developments that generate ten PM peak --hour trips or less will be required to pay a $200 per PM peak -hour trip fee. PM Peak -Hour Trips X $200 = $ D--WY Page 5 10lia CourL Townhomes I 21W] 80th A— 7. EJ.�&TA ge(rA 0a! LSET BACK, L r-w I W-61 39' 'b' 1 L I 15 T_ , i I '__ \ I a . a - - DASWED LINES INDICATE UNDER GROUND TANI< 9 DRAIN SYSTEM ALL CN SITE IMPERVIOUS AREAS DRAIN TO DETENTION PIPE ANY $ITE IMPROVEMENT CB.'S WOOD FENCE 4 5ETWEEN UNITS TYP . . . . . . . . . . _7 4 ------------------ .......... ------------------ % 00i UN IT-1 �Nl��. UNIT-3 r T ------ - -- ----:?-� .... ;OCT ....... 1-1-7 +11 z L L -------------- i ------- --------- M ------ 41 X UNI1*4 Nl-f.� UNIT-6 NEW ------------------------------ I ..................... 4 'J4 1:40 -fig- EX. SITE _P�AN 06,1N, SITE INFORALkTION ZONE: Ri 2.4 Max MIGHT 30' LOT COVERAGE 45% TOTAL SITE AFEA, IS~ SF. 0.34435 AC 6 UNITS W1 2 PAWM STALLS ( ENCLOSED ) SF. BALDING FOOTPRINTt PROVIDED LOT C47YERAGE 6.750 45% let FLOOR AREA 6.328 SF. 2md FLOOR AAEA 6.790 SF. PI;aOVIDED LANDSCAPE SOW SF. M,Aproject-0325 K&gnollf CoLrt-r�ad.Sdwdul".3298L-ecalco2a NOTES: EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGNT (ED 2 PER UNIT LURALINE WI-302141, INCANDESCENT WOW, WIT14 MIN" Lr3I4T SPILLa VICINITYMAP: NTS 212th St* Sw ITE 21*&th St 216th S �. SW 216th 5t: SW 22M 6 . SW 222nd SO 4 N, 0 - No: L)KAWN 15Y: jtifj NAMI?- 325 1 061,4 rf-IrTirl Me architects ps Map DATE: CHECKED BY: polia Co= 9*/24/02 ADO 600 Maln Street, Sulle C SHEET No. Edmonds, WA 90020-3079 REVISION/FO No.: PROJECT NO: 426.778.6400 FAX T?8=2 02500 A1.1- 0 11 D 7 12/17/2002 15:33 25385808-�6 E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 01 SOIL REPORT Magnolia Court Townhomes, 21501 80th.Ave. W., Edmonds, WA FOR: A. D. Shapiro Architects PS 600 Main Street, Suite C Edmonds, WA 9802o BY: Edward Robison E&L CIVIL ENGINEERING .4508 PARK LANE NW GIG HARBOR, WA 98336 253-858-0855 FAX 253-858-0856 RECEIVED DEC 2 3 2002 PERMIT COUNTER 12/1712002 15:33 25385808!,�,6 E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 02 Eft Civil EngineeTiq Mr. George Hanna A.D. Shapiro Architects PS 600 Main Street Suite C Edmonds, WA 98020 17 Dec 2002 Subject: UWF.M.)GATION OF SOIL CONDMONS AT MAGNOLIA COURT TOWNHONES, 21501 BUI-H AVE W, EDMONDS, WA. I performed a site investigation on 16 Dec 2002. The site investigation involved a review of the surrounding area, excavation of three test pits, and review of known occurrences, of soil related earthquake damage in the area. The proposed use for the site is the construction of two, two story residential buildings with the associated parking, utilities, landscaping and other appurtenances. The site is located on the plateau east of the steep hill system along the Puget Sound. The site currently is developed -with a one story house and a shed with a gravel driveway. The existing structures are around 50 years old and in poor repair. The existing house is supported on a CMU perimeter strip foundation. The back half of the property has several large douglas fir trees. The tree roots are extensive in the upper 2 feet of the soil. The site also has some grass, bushes and shrubs. An inspection of the existing structure and surrounding improvements did not identify any signs of soil stability related problems. The e7dsting foundation bears at 8'*' below the ground surface on a footing consisting of an unreinforced grout bed around V thick and 8" wide. There is no signs of movement or soil instability in the foundation and no visible cracking at any location. There were no visible soil stability problems in the adjacent streets or structures. A review of documented earthquake damage in this area did not reveal arty cases on sites situated on the soil strata like that near the surface of this site. . Test holes were excavated to mess the soil type and conditions, refer to the attached site plan for locations of test holes. USGS OFR 93-233 Geological Map of Surficial Deposits in the Seattle 3Vx6V Quadrangle maps the soils as Vashon TiM (Qvt). This is consistent with the soil observed in the test hole& This is a very dense soil with low permeability and a very high bearing strength when undisturbed because of the high overburden pressure during the glacial period. Based on published deep borings in this Page 7 4508 Park Lane 253-858-0855 Gig Harbor, WA 98332 12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856� E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 03 21501 80th SW, Ednzonds, WA, Sails Evaluation area the Vashon till soil overlies gravelly sands that are very dense and strong. This extends to hard marine sedimentary rock at a depth of 50 to 200 feet below the surface. The upper weathered layer of the soil is often loose because of the action of plant roots, worms and other biological factors. The site profile observed in the test pits; HOLE 1 ,0-8" Silty loam, dark, low cohesion, (MH) numerous small shallow roots, loose. 8"-15" Silty loam, brownish red, low cohesion (W), small roots, loose, wet 15"'-31" Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-S.M), reddish yellow medium dense, wet 31"-58" Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SM), reddish yellow very dense, very hard, saturated, stones up to 10" diameter. Liquefaction potential - none, Settlement/ consolidation potential - very low Soil has moderate static bearing strength - greater flian 2000 psf allowable. HOLE 2 0-10" Silty loam, dark low cohesion, (N1H) numerous shallow roots, loose. 10"-19" Silty loam brownish red, low cohesion (MP), small roots, loose, dry lr-3r Sandy, gravelly, silt (MI4-SM), light tan, medium dense, dry 39"-7W Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SM), light tan very dense, very hard, dry, stones up to 10" diameter. Liquefaction potential - none, Settlement/ consolidation potential - very low Soil has moderate static beafing strength - greater than 2000 psf allowable. HOLE 3 O-V Silty loam, dark, low cohesiom (MH) numerous shallow roots, loose, wet 4"-16" Silty lo&m, brownish red, low cohesion (NW), small roots, loose, wet 16"-25" Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SNP, light tan, medium dense, moist 25"-60" Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SM), light tan very dense, very hard, dry, stones up to 10" diameter. Liquefaction potential - none, Settlement/ consolidation potential - very low Soil has moderate static bearing strength,- greater than 20M psf allowable. The site soils have little cohesion and little to no day content. Ile sand content is fine to very fine sands. Appearance of the soil in the holes indicates a probable high perched seasonal water level of approximately 30" below surface. The holes were excavated 17 Dec 2002 Page 2 12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856 0 E L CIVIL ENG W PAGE 04 21501 80th SW, Edmonds, WA, S�orils Evaluation during the first extended rainfall of the winter. The perched groundwater table appears to be greatest towards the west and migrates east. The large douglas fir trees on the site contribute to the drying of the soil on the eastern half of the lot resulting in the dry soil condition observed in this area. After these trees are removed the perched groundwater will become more significant in this area. The soil strata appear to be consistent over the entire site except for the moisture content. The site slopes to the east with approximately four feet of fall. UQUEFAMON There is no liquefaction potential at this site. The soil density, grain size and condition are not conducive of liquefaction, Liquefaction does not need to be considered in designing the proposed structure and parking lot pavements. CHARACTERIZATION OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD There are no soil related conditions at this site that would pose an increased risk in an earthquake. No special recommendations or actions are required for earthquakes. RECOMMENDED BEARING STRESSES AND SEISMIC LOADING For wood framed shear wall construction the seismic base shear for a structure at this site is: V=3.00a/ R = 0.1%W for LRFD, divide by 1.4 for ASD. where: Ca 0.36 for Zone 3 profile SD W weight of building R = 5.5 for light framed bearing walls with plywood shear panels If other construction type is used the value of R shall be adjusted accordingly. Reconunended allowable soil bearing strength for a maximum long term settlement of under 1" and maximum differential settlement of 1/ 2-: 2000 pounds per square foot for bearing at 1.5, to 3' below ground surface 3000 psf for bearing below 3'. Footings shall be on undisturbed soils below the root zone. LateW bearing strength: 0.3 x weight Passive soil resistance: 450 psf/ft for depths over 1.5'below ground surface, Active earth pressure for retaining walh 30 psf for granular filL 35 psf fDr native fills. At rest earth pressure 50 psf - usefor tied back waUs. Earth pressure for restrained walls 40 psf - use for basement walls. 17 Dec 2002 Page 3 12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856 0 E L CIVIL ENG 0* 1:EONEW 21501 80th SW, Ednwnds, WA, Soils Ez*luation FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS: The following recommendations are being provided to accommodate the proposed construction on the lot It is the opinion of the engineer that this is the most cost effective and efficient method to provide a safe foundation. Constructing the foundation in this fashion will protect the structure from soil settlement. 1. The foundation should be a shallow type system utilizing strip footings and pier pads. Any found ation element should bear a minimum of Y-6" below the existing ground surface on firm undisiturbed soil. There is no special design or construction features warranted for the foundation construction. 2. Disturbed soils shall be compacted to 9517o of the maximum density as determined by ARM method D-1557. The contractor may need to add water (or dry during the winter) to achieve proper compaction. 3. The contractor shall remove any unsuitable materials from under any slabs on grade and pavement. T1-d6 is estimated to be approximately 10" from the existing ground surface. The existing soils below the unsuitable layer may be used for structural fin but will require special compaction methods and effort to achieve adequate compaction - PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The unsuitable upper site soils (about 8" to 127) of the existing site soils shall be removed from the areas to receive pavement The site subgrade should be compacted to a minimum of 957o of the maximum density as determined by WSDOT test method no. 609 or ASTM D-1557. The pavement section should have a minimum of 1.5 inches of crushed surface top course and the surfacing should be Class B asphalt cement pavement minimum 2 inches thick placed in accordance with the Washington State Department of Transportation specifications. EARTHWORK CRITERIA Earthwork should be performed in accordance with the WSDOT Standard Specifications Division 2 sections 2-01, 2-02, 2-09 and 2-10 except as modified herein. Any material used for fill shall be free of roots, wood or other deleterious materials. Fills placed under structures should be compacted to a minimuin of 957o of the nuiximum density as determined by WSDOT test method no. 609 or AISTM D4557. Fills placed in other locations should be compacted to 90 except for the final lift which should be compacted to 9579. 77 Dec 2002 Page 4 12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856 E L CIVIL ENG 0 PAGE 06 21501 80th SW, Edtnonds, WA, Soils Evaluation Utility trenches shall be compacted to 957o of maximum density. Backfill for trenches shall consist of selected materials to assure adequate compaction. Selected material may be existing materials or existing blended with imported granular fill free of wood or other deleterious materials. Utility trenches over 4' deep shall be either shored or sloped back at 1:1. High groundwater may be encountered when excavating utility trenches during the winter or spring. The contractor shall be responsible for dewatering or otherwise stabilizing the utility trenches to permit the excavation and installation of the utilities. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The proposed improvements will require erosion and sediment control in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements. The soils are moderately erodible and have some cohesion and can be easily transported from the site. The soils are poorly drained so that direct runoff win occur with medium sized rain events. Special runoff controls should not be required during construction but may become necessary if site work is performed in the winter.. The following shall be observed and performed at the site during constructiow. I . During construction all haul equipment and transport vehicles shall be kept on the hard surfaces or special gravelled areas so that soil is not transported from the site. 2. Catch basins shall be protected from sediments from the site. 3. A low area of approximately 200 sf and I foot deep should be left near the eastern end of the site to collect any site runoff during construction. 4. Site soils are moderately erodible. Excavated soils shall be stockpiled so as to prevent soils from eroding and being transported from the site. This may require covering soil stock piles. 5. Install a silt fence or other diversion berm along the east side of the site to prevent runoff from flowing easterly from the site. 17 Dec 2002 Page 5 12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856 0 E L CIVIL ENG 9 PAGE 07 21501 80th SW, Edmonds, WA, Soils Evaluation CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE L Preconstruction meeting 2. Install erosion control measures 3. Clear/ grub site demolish existing structures 4. excavate foundation, remove excess soil 5. Place foundation 6. Install subsurface drainage and storm drainage 7. Backfill foundation and complete grading, remove surplus soil. 8. Install permanent soil cover, seed exposed areas and landscape 9. Clean storm drain and place in service MINIMUM RISK STATEMENT The proposed development when constructed in accordance with these recommendations will, have minimal risk of damage from soil instability and will pose minimal risk to adjacent properties from soil movement. Edward C. Robisor�, P.E. MAN 17 Dec 2002 Page 6 12/17/2002 15: 33 2538580856 E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 08 cp �90 IV Aq,.lMr* I !V/ at ---------- DWM'JDT I I bi I L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2*M St. &W Oct 12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856 E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 09 ,J I N7 -I JJ 40 ......... .. .. pi ............ Kp 1p. -8 -'W fit "0' SSMH RIA4=106.OJ T I.E.=98.05 n9 I'S Jo. A _zo ')p ol 10 4111 SET NAIL TOP FENCE POST =:7-- X APPROVED BY PLANNING �11§ e-11 S\A�-ll —X - a no," -111,X- 15 %(:) cv, k!cpp. - \ "I N. �' - " -I 1:60,K001 ev Nq lip IbP FIX I* EXIST. HSE IV. VZ Sz , lc�i H� 150.00 x------------ -P Ap E7 —0.5, x . —EX CHAINLINMK%&E A 4 bll�l ix 01 .5)k,) X—� x ctiv X CB RIM= 105.70 I.E. = 100. 18 4 v: CB RIM= 102.9 7 I E. =98.12 G�nf OF Ei-,)MONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT WORK -1 - -.. ADC,:,'ESS - T 0 W N E rR APPROVED DATE: GLOG. OFFICIAL PFERMiT NUMBER . . . ................. d� 1&' Zo top STREET FILE 0 0 b Virg fV .1 f** Ei IV 0 FEJ PERMIT COUAITER 0 0 Ile Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form,is to � A propert y. owner, pF his/her authorized representative, be filled out by any person preparing a'D'ev'elo"pmii!t't'�"�-iriiist-fill-,Oiit the -checklist, sign ap� date ii,`and submit it Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to tq.the t - ....Qjty. 1he, City will review, the - checkl - is, make a his/her submittal of the application to the City. precursory site visit, and maie a', determination of the ne purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas 'are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complet� the Checklist should be ..,easily, 1 1. .1 .1 "� . available from observations of the site or data aviilable'dt' . . - w: City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or' soil' surveys). , . F! a quent steps necessary to complete a development permit, application. Please submit a vicinity� map, along with the signed copy of this, form to assist City. staff in finding and locating the 'bed on this.,form. In speci ic pjqc�.q, pr9pert ,y, qscn a:ddiiibn,"ihe 'alp'plicafit `shall. include other pertinent t ,infbithation. (e.& site plani topography map, etc.) or stitdies,in conjunction, with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/itp. heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing, of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and'hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages' I including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any, action or infraction* based in whole or part upon false, misleading,- inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted aretrue and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this'application onthe behalf of the owner as listed below. 7 SIGNATURE OF'APPLICANT/AGENT- DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have autho *zed the 6/ove Applicant/Agent to. apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials. and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and postin ttendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER - 4 :, � Owner/Applicant.- 14ame X UM004.5' K/A*N 41 Z64 Street Address city State Zip Telephone&_2S;� 17 1 - -7,Q-70 Email addr�_ss (optional): h6J+hayj MV)S000l. COM Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 DATE Applicant RiWsentative: Narne �00 MPAI,� SUA C, Street Address! — e q90.20 city State Zip Telephone: qZ!Q Email Address (optional): S Ort ShO D) ro. 0- . CA File No:_,-z -I'Itical Areas Checklist Sibe-Information (soils'/ topography/hydrology/ vegetation) 1. Site Address/ Location: 1 go 4 /+ty tj e d- Mp%j!; 4 ;4j 2. Property Tax Account Number: 0430 001 - 06 -7 W 3. App'ro'xn*; M*�e Site Size: (acres or square feet): /5.000 130 4. Is this site currently developed? -��yes; — no. If yes; how is site developed? 31tia (L rLnidma-� 5. Desmibe the general site topography. ChLick:aU that'apply. Flat: less than 5-feet. elevation change over entire site. RoUing: slopes on site. generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). 11illy: slopes 'present"on site 6f.more th,�n 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance6f 33 to 6,6-feet). Steep: grades. of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal 'distance of less ithan 33-feet). Other (pleasede I scribe): ! . I 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth: 7. Site contdns areas of seasonal standing water: NO Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? C�; 8. Site is in the flo6dway, 1 A10 'floo4plain INO of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows acros&fhesiouiLds surface? Flows are year-round? , "i. ,,, f -4t �*, ; ( � &* " %,"-, Flows are.seasonal?- t;tinhA-.o -year. 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed urba'n'tandscaped,(lawn, . shrubs'etc).7- 11. Obvious wetland is presenton site:". S -, 5�1 X MpgMtg ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ - el Nt 4 K FT. - 7-�M M, 4a M-4 mom, a 011'.14j":WM -M, r WRYMM rlyiorl rb C Q a A [VT � M M M.— IWO NO, EtFIT -7,- aj esigna M U M �,7 ..... - - - - - - IV �jl,� X! A -EIZ N JI -9-.. 41 V Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 0 6 DATE RECEIVED PERMIT FXPIR E*S USE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE Z/ '00- e— NUMBER JOB SUITE/APT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION ADDRESS 2- \ so 7� Q�'n OWNER NAMEINAMEl OF,BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. Lo� LID NO. LID FEE $ C_ MAILING ADDRESS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TIESCP Approved RW Pernilit Required z 38 ck—lorz— 4��71W\Q `2 t.V _(0 EXISTING — PROPOSED Street Use Pamnit Roq'V Inspection Required 13 Sidewalk Required [3 CITY ZIP TE PAONE LE c)m2z REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT Undergivound Wiring required 0 NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED 1 1 -YES 13 NO 13 13 1 ir ADDRESS REMARKS z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE z CITY zip, TELEPHONE 9��?_jc> 114 -z_s---nR— 14 bt) NAME jCBL# ENGI , NEERING REVIEWED BY D4E ADDRESS ir 0 FIRE-FIEVIEWED BY Lu CITY Zip --- TELEPHONE 0 '.'VARIANCE:9R CU :SHORELINE OR ADB#,4 INSPECTION B OND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE, oo' CHECKED' "A, i YES KNO $ SEPAtREVIEW', :COMPLETE EXEMPT. IIIGN AREA,',. ALLOWED , PROPOSED : HEIGHT 'ALLOWED, PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT. PARCEL NO. '11' .." I EXP NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBINGIMECH LOT COVERAGE . : REQUIRED. SETBACKS (I�T), PA6POSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/RSIDE REAR COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION \f-1 COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF. USE k5 000 z REMODEL MULTIFAMILY, El SIGN z 5 CL PARK NG RE D "ROVIM L AREA PLANWWe-REMEW ED BY 6ATE REPAIR GRADING F ENC E REMARKS CYDS Fr) DEMOLISH TANK LON o GARAGE RETAINING WALL [:],FRES RINKLER z CARPORT ROCKERY F2 APARM rL (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS O"VTTITY).EXP`"N:, CHECKED BY F COTR OCCUPANT U) Lu -GROUP NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL SPEC 0 M OF DWELLING AREAS L1 0 STORIES U NITS NUMBER OIL- REQUIRED YES LOAD DE!=�TE DONE 10L REMARKS z PROGRESS INSPECTIONS'PER UBC1 08/FINAL INSPECTION REaD CX- ik, a-?T C_ V, '41 �L "Ug_,_mAez,'C."Q. --ro IL-2g):2 fb-,7 j2rzd�=-A 01112n A^ i A-g —V,41 VALUATION Disicription - �_,FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge 1"Y HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % iBuilding,Permit—, City Surcharge CHECK NO- VESTED DATE 'Plumbl g. Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. En r. Review PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS .9 CL PERMIT UMrP I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 1180DAYS Engr IRSPOGIwOR I SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapelnsp. Total Amt. Due 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE C17YS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION. - Recording Fee Receipt # I HERESY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged In space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENS!DPU4bI*,URANCE AND RCW 18.27. U OWNER R AGENT) IC ATE NGNED (425) 0 IA GNATP b 3 L �:= 771-0220 R SED B DATE ATTENTION Off 1333 I / I IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL -FILE YELL6W.INSP-VOR PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN - ACCOUNTING E RECEIVED ell PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS LfSE PERRAIT ZONE NUMBEF&PO -05�1 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/A"# ADDREssd/.6 At,& 0 &/mrind-541 OWNER NA ME�NAME OF B�SIJESS r T I A&vv& - * %Q6 a kS kbM,_r_ a 1 4, & 14 (A Y1A PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. jq2- UM MAILING ADDRESS L q-lq'2 edymnds WQA PMB gtoto PUBLIC RIGHT OF AY PER OFFICIAL S ET MA 4;ET MA TESCP Approved RW Permit Required Street Use Perrnft Roq'V CITY TELEIIHONE EXISTING PROP ED- spection Required Sidmalk Required A, amn REQUIRED DEDI I NM FT Underground wiring required NAME METER SI k LINE 574 SIZE NO. OF FIXTUREqS PR a IRED U 13 N A spmi ro A rc�;,kas SVE YE NO Cc I- ADDRESS REMARKS W z z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE a (400 so Nel z CITY ZIP &.(aud 020 ITELEPHONE NZ��)779-,C_400 Wg0two I MqK-f-p" - NAME Col. # ENG I NEERINQ, REVIEWED BY ADDRESS 1-7q2 Vj TIM 6 �a� 11;170 FI W B DATE Y/ 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE R4LI0177L-07,210, C4 AlfAl or ;0 �1. � �11 A106- _ , I I STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE XAWGNMQy : RIANCE OR C U . 0, SHORELINE ORADB#'I-' INSPECTION EO'D BOND POSTED S NA L U IN tl�IA 9 1 ZY P, SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT, PARCEL COMPLE)E EXEMPT --ALLOWED, PROPOSED ,ALLOWED PROPOSED o -60 00" 067 0 EXP/7 0 NEW §� RESIDENTIAL _� .., . X-A PLUMBING,,/ MECH 1, LOT COVERAGtp — ALLOWED' �PROPOSU', REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) PROPOSED SIDE:; REA R SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT LIRSIDE REAR . - � , ..FRONT_:; 1. ': ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCEOR CHANGE OF USE "zo LALAA V 15 10 A 5 C) ES z z El REMODEL LTWAMILY El SIGN PARKING 'Q' REa A& ROVIDED LOT AREA �PLAVNINI21 REVIEWED BY DATE ya$ FENCE'i REPAIR GRA DING , CYDS ( jLL k:— Fr) M KS OTHER DEMOLISH TANK GARAGE RETAINING WALL F RE SPRINKLER 13 1:1 CARPORT ROCKERY FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, BUSIN S OR A I PLAIN: h 4�i P, 61 61j_ C7SjTYPE_M!UTRU cTI ON CODE OCCUPANT 'A w 0 NUMBER —111AP .- -&UMBER OF -.0 CRITICAYL �4- 41-7 GROUP 4PP gi OF DWELLING 1 4 a I A SPECIAL INSPECTION / I -sr �90 OCCUPANT 0 STORIES '?, UNITS N F W— / V= REQUIRED C] VF:r e2- /A 1-24a a�k LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE inMF REMARKS M9 z PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 1,08/FINAL INSPECTION REG' It-n "A- i;w AT--VT--t,7 to eam A U 0.11 n eyx 0" 1 VALUATION 1 'Poch urdF. ki4iW f q AA AAM a5; yo&j Description I Desefription FEE .,t�EE. 0 Plan Check : - State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % 1 W �LOT SLOPE % �Building,-,fermlt f' r City Surcharge a a 6 _, I z C, ak, PLAN CHECKJIO: VESTED DATE -,Plumbin' a. , :$` Y7 a, WO - 4W — Mechanical '7 � THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO ,7()o t= BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading pp, DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE q0 SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review W PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT ILIMIT I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN -180 DAYS Engr. Inspection A/mo, SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF M EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY I 9 FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFX WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapeinsp. Total Amt. Due _457'? 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.- Recording Fee Receipt # . IHi RESY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLAT ON OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged In space provided. WORKMEN!S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. 1 OFFICI IGINEE TE 98 SIGNATURE (OWNER e—AGE11V - DATE SIGNED (425) car 771-0220 . ATTENTION Off 1333 AS D BY DATE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL .4 IAII)l A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN - ACCOUNTING DATE RECEIVED 4!VNI75 W4 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS A MAILING ADDRESS qv2 �44 CITY ZIP TKEPHONE &Iftoudis ftQn E12�)771 - NAME 141, ro kat�yc ADDRESS .1 ILA_ A CITY NAME ADDRESS g-1 CITY STATE LICENSE NUMBER zip TELEPHONE CBL III [PERMIT EXPIRES USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS fo#1 Att W, Ed mond PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION No. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STRE MAP EXISTING,!�_ 7 TESCP Approved RW Permit Required Street use Permit Roq'd Inspection Required PROF�SED Side.alk Required REQUIRED DEDICATION FT underground Wiring required METER SIZE 1.11,116 SIZE NO. OF FIXTURE S REQUIRED V YEPRV NO El ul REMARKS z z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE R—,i- 4%439� 12261—OS - I _L, V_rw j J14ec? IlospVrnno.. ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE Ah It, _,FI DATE J�IEI_91PHOINIE /0 -7 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT, PARCEL NO. 2_1 e)Q!:�n e5ni 61,1 On VNEW ED' RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR CHANGE OF USE REK40DEL MULT IFAMILY SIGN REPAIR GRADING CYDS 13 FEN CE X_ FT) DEMOLISH TANK 1:1 OTHER GARAGE RETAINING WALL. 0 F RE SPRINKLER CARPORT ROCKERY F:RE ALARM (rYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTFV,rrY) q"N.,'. Mwiti M;W� 46uvn� A t.4 NUW3ER NUMBCR OF CRITICAL fie /AmNd� OR cu NE OR ADB# -' i INSPECTION ROND IR W_ EQ'D POSTED -Z S ONO 0.—IB5 's 2� I , No2l) SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA, HEIGHT 9MPL9TE EXEMPT 'ALLOWED PROPOSED .�ALLOWED - x 30 LOT,COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT,):, , PROPOSED SETBACKS (FF.) 10WED I PROPOSE �FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR Ab�z 4Lff, 161, PARKING LOT AREA PLA? �JNG REVIEWEDBY DATE ECY04+ PROVIDED 000 000 000 A TYPE Q C CIPN STRUCTION COU OCCUPANT `7 GROUP OF DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTION �� [j-r OCCUPANT,�6 /72 / I 0��jg UNITS NUMBW-11�� REQUIRED [:] 5 wIrOAD STORIES YES DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE,, It> U 11, U I r\) (--I j_jj J Cl REMARKS N R'IE- -INSPE PER'UBC1,08MINAL INSPECTI, PROGRtSS CTION bu 1 ld4q VALUATION' 6mbblises With 11, Description :,,.FEE. Dedcription FEE Plan Check .2 State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING% ILOT.,6LOPE % VBuilding Pern.1 City Surcharge 130/6 PLM CHCCK NQ: VESTED DATE "P �r y lumbing - Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS. DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review Lu PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT ILIMTP I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Depos IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt It ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapelnsp. 4e e_,# I Total Amt. Due Q, 5 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.* x Recording Fee el 4 Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION — APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLAT ON OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN!S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. QE� ICI IG.; O�/ �JE ; SIGNATURE (OWNER AGElfi)-;/ Ce I DATE SIGNED 2- 771-0220 �An44WV-v "R I A ag E ED BY DATE ATTENTION cNn a--�KaC5 Off 1333 4 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL , A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW INSPECTIR PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN ACCOUNTING City of Edmonds Permit No:":L 7 RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT issue Date: :Z/4,Zh23 A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Type of Work (be specific): IJT(G(lq 108i�-_r/041 JeG) lmo&A�2-wr C. Contractor:. Contact:- 4-S. ft&2C1T1PPhone: Mailing Address: 4;�A State License#: L_U%,)kPt a_c� cyp, Liability Insurance: Bond: $ dff,1_91�5 D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): Commercial El Subdivision E] CityProject E] EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD) Multi -Family F1 Single Family 0 Other F. PAVEMENT CUT: F-1 YES El NO CONCRETE CUT: 0 YES F-1 NO G. SIZE OF CUT X INDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or.unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES 97LL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BYCITYFORCES, AT WHICH TIMEA DEBITOR CREDIT 47LL BEPROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THEAPPLICANT. + Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every' flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. * Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday - NO EXCEPTIONS. * Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HA VE READ THE ABO VE STA TEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND A CKNO WLEDGE THATIMUSTM KE7 PINK COPY OF THE PERMITA VAILABLE ON SITE A TALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature: Date. '-7-2_-2_-,N 2,, (Contractor or Menu UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326) FINAL APPROVAL OFPERMITTED WORK. - Inspector's Signature DATE: For inspection requirements see Engineering Inspection Information handout. NO WORK SHALL, BECIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE DAMy Documcnis\Forms\Engnrng\ROWpermit_.doc DATE RECEIVED . � �Ay� %4` CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAMEINAME OF BUSINESS C . ha Y I fe, /J Aw n MAILING ADDRESS 12 I ;t dd wond -5 VJ qjo, (o CITY ZIP I TELEPHONE NAME I I, 1.,f - ADDRESS PERMIT EXPIRES USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBERO&x W JOB SUITFJAPT# ADDRESS o Ay, k) i -rdymms PLAT NAM E/SUBDIVI SION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ TESCP Appmed 13 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Pemilt Required Q Street Uoe Permit Req'd (3 EXISTING Inspection Required 0 0 P Idewalk Required 0 REQUIRED DEDICATION F REQUIR 1 01 sundorground .. 9% —_ —_ I Wiring required 0 METER S12F "'=E�%j '11&+AwAffk?SwTV*PF#%UIRED I I M . NO 0 3 DR SEW MUST BE Ck"sj& REMARKS - N8 z z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE 0 z dik WATRR MRTRR 7n RR Lul CITY Z, P TELEPHONE MILIN yn Immail I Im DUMP AT APBROVED 1XI x NAME slik nAMOT 1TIObI TN_QM=0jg N0410m an A i ENGI,NEE it# jQjt# CKLIST ON BACK WWrAW 10RANSPaCTiON MQujRmBM ADDRESS FiFIEREVIEWED By DATE Lu LL CITY 1p�. Z JELEPHO NE 77/. : . VARIANCE OR CU '.-,SHORELINE ADB# - INSPECTION REO'D PBOND S TED STATE LICENSE NUMBER -RPIRM10N DATE CHECKED BY � I z NA LU t4A Iq 8JS9 ....'d. 0 YES 0 NO SEPARIEVIEW:: COMPLETE ,EXEMPT SIGNAREA ''ALLOWED PROPOSE HEIGHT OWED ALL PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCELNb. 1-1 643& col,� EXP C3 NEW RESIOENTIAL,,, PLUMBINd'/.MECH LOT COVERAGE 'ALLOWED PROPOSED, REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT,: �SIDE:: REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT',-,URSIDE REAR El ADDITION 0 COMMERCIAL: COMPLIANCE.OR z CHANGE OF USE z PARKING LOT AREA: PtANNING;lF*y1EWED'6V DATE APARTMENT GN 0 REMODEL 11. 0 k.EQ'D:, PROVIDED QL C]-.'GRADING FENCE 0 REPAIR CYDS 0 FT): REMARKS DEMOLISH TANK C:] OTHER GARAGE WALL. CARPORT RENEWAL ROCKERY (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS ORACTIVITY) EXPLAK., CHECKED BY TYPEg C4�� OCCUPANT aCONSTR,,U)CTION GROUP i NUMBER CRITICAL SPECIAL INSPE TOR OCCUPANT OF I DWE1LLING:I I AREAS STORIES UNITS N LIM B E R JAREA REQUIRED [3 YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONSIPER UBCA,081FINAL INSPECTION REO'D helyinh;sk hoose om -5619. 4�eu in Tiui 16 &wovdro P, - re ± -4o .ins_ + -:51k mh�" I - Wit 'JA 10- Al A I avid VALUATION FEE *I-M yl I" V_ed PLAN CHECK FEE', HE ATSOJRW GLAZING % LOT SLOPE Fla+ % ],PLUMB BUILDING,""' PLAN CHECK NO: IVESTE6 DATE NG MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. AN CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL 2 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVIEWAYSYMARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS 06 PERMIT LIMIT* I YEAR - PROVIDED WOR K,S STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION ;APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE w N INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF A LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIPT DEEMEDTO MODIFY� WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAYTHE CITY'S ABILITYTO ENFORCE ANYORDINANCE PROVISION.* R CEIP I TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. --aft OF C LS SIGIMRE DATE SIGN URE (OWNER 0 Elq)- N DATE S NED (425) w-,_4 6XII 771 -0�220 -/DATE/ RELEASED BY TION U EXT1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR occupy A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CEFITIFI_ CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR FAX PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 July 17, 2005 To: Edmonds -City Council Subject: RECEIVE JUL 18 2005 EDMONDS CITY CLER Laura Caparroso requests that the City of Edmonds install tactile domes for the blind on the north wheelchair ramp crossing at 216th St. Wand 76th Avenue West. Laura Caparroso requests that the City of Edmonds Install an audio pedestrian signal at the same crossing. ,,,— -a,�r -Caparroso-moved to the city of Edmonds 8 months ago and now owns a town home ,a �— -;nue' Wesi. She is totally blind, uses an assist animal for moving about the a021503 86th A:v neighb6r�hood and uses public transportation for her work day commutes to her 5 day -a -week job In Seattle. To procure groceries, Laura walks from her home to Top Foods, the closest grocery store. She must cross 76th Avenue West and considers the crosswalk at the intersection of 76th Avenue West and 220th St. S.W. dangerous. She considers this crossing unsafe because of the speed of drivers making right hand turns on the red light at 220th St. S.W. and their tendency not to come to a complete halt before turning right. Therefore, Laura requests that the City of Edmonds install tactile domes on the north wheelchair ramp crossing at 216th St. SW. and 76th Avenue West. There are 2 wheelchair ramp crossings at 216th St SW. By placing the tactile domes on the north crossing, Laura will not have to navigate a second crossing on 216th St. SW. Also, there is no audio pedestrian signal on the 216th St. SW crossing signal. Laura says that she can hear the traffic stop, but we think that in storm conditions, an audio pedestrian signal will be far safer. Please consider the Importance of funding and implementing these safety requests as soon as possible. Respectfully, Laura Caparroso 21603 80th Ave. West Edmonds, WA- 426-673-7919 caparrosoO-comcast- net -1�� 4'wri' Steve and Ginny Burger (friends) 22910 102nd Place West Edmonds, WA, 98020 425-776-4896 JZt. e�Zez� wburger0aft.net City of Edmonds Permit No:,46M-014? 7 RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: -7/4-21j230 A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: -215V( B. Type of Work (be specific): JJT1(JM4 10-50AUADCrIll 6 C. Contractor: ��NLt L&A Contact: Mailing Address:2aa,,,, Phone: -2-6 � o 7 iS - -_:�B Z Q.) State License L-U kl�kpt �s k-'s Liability Insurance: Bond: S D. Building �ermit # (if applicable): 27. Re- Ar4-% Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): C;;1 499 - C-1 -.12 �-� V E. Commercial Subdivision E] Cityproject E] EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD) Multi -Family Single Family Other fNSPECTOR: F. PAVEMENT CUT: El YES El NO G." SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: 0 YES El NO AII'LICANTTO IZI,"Al) ANI) SIGN INDEMNITY. Applicant understands by �islher. signature to this ppplication helshe holds the City, of Edmonds harmless from. injuries, damages or claims of any kind or 'description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the - City of, Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not. limited to the defense of any lekalproceedings including defiense,,' costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLL097NG THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF, THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE. FINAL,STREET PATCH IS COMPLkTtD BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT W!LL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Traffic. control And public safety shall be in accordance with City regulat , ions as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must -be trained as required, by, (WAC)' 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying. completion of the required training in their possession. Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched'with asphalt or City - approved, -material prior to the end of the workday - NO EXCEPTIONS. Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HA VE READ THE ABOVESTA TEMENTS AND UNDER STAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THA T I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMITA VAILABLE ON SITE A TALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS I Signature: (Contractor or Date: -FOR, CITY USE ONLY' Approved by:. AI6 Right-of-way Fee:. e2!Z Disruption Fee/Fund 111: Time Authorized: Void After :2 *241 ,Special Conditions- 6U, tZe AJ, 41*01tYD I Restoration. Fee: &-wMao-m% OVI Awgyw TotatTee: /111) A00&0,0 �TRA�rp-16 Receipt No: _T4 0 Issued by:,. A- V WITH A- M4NUM'Of UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326) FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. DATE: Inspqctor's. Signature For inspection requirements see Engineering Inspection Information handout. i DAMy Documents\Forms\Engnmg�ROWpermit_.doc Is 8fl3-/'O'�3 5:9:6 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 1 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO f ............ all . I . -APPENEYIX-R---DETEN-T-IION-VC)=. 2, 10, 10 OYR - 2 4 HR BASIN SUMMARY vvzu Fitt BASIN ID: A100DEV NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:100YR DEV. SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAI14FALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres 0.28 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 90.00 98.00 TC .... : 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.24 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: A100EX NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:100YR EX SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.38 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 81.00 98.00 TC .... : 38.19 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313 PEAK RATE: 0.08 cfs VOL: 0.04 Ac-ft TIME: 520 min BASIN ID: A10DEV NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR DEV. SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 2.00 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres 0.28 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 90.00 98.00 TC .... : 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.15 cfs VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN -ID: A10EX NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR EX SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 2.00 inches AREA..: 0.38 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 81.00 98.00 TC .... : 38.19 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313 PEAK RATE: 0.03 cfs VOL: 0.02 Ac-ft TIME: 520 min L/ r r �-- , L) 8/13/03 5:9:7 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 2 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A2DEV NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:2YR DEV. SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 1.50 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres 0.28 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 90.00 98.00 TC .... : 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.10 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: A2EX NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:2YR EX SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 1.50 inches AREA..: 0.38 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 81.00 98.00 TC .... : 38.19 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313 PEAK RATE: 0.01 cfs VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 550 min 8/13/03 5:9:8 pm, Dean Hough & Associates page 3 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0.014 1120 1512 cf 0.38 2 0.030 710 2151 cf 0.38 3 0.083 580 3458 cf 0.38 1- 8/13/03 5:9:8 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 4 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. P1 Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE, P1 Diameter: 2.00 ft. Length: 349.00 ft. Slope ... : 0.0000 ft/ft upstr: dnstr: UNDERGROUND PIPE I ID No. P2 Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE,P2 Diameter: 3.00 ft. Length: 155.00 ft. Slope ... : 0.0000 ft/ft upstr: dnstr: 8/13/03 5:9:8 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 5 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH.AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 01 Description: ORIFICE COMBINED STRUCTURE,01 Outlet Elev: 98.20 Elev: 96.20 ft Orifice Diameter: 0.6416 in. Elev: 100.00 ft Orifice-2 Diameter: 1.0400 in. Elev: 100.30 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 1.2598 in. 8/13/03 5:9:10 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 6 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE < -------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (Cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id (Cfs) VOL (Cf) 2YR STORM DESIGN ............. 0.01 0.10 P2 01 99.88 1 0.01 632.;;=Cf 10YR STORM DESIGN ............ 0.03 0.15 P2 01 100.22 2 0.03 783.39 cf 100YR STORM DESIGN ........... 0.08 0.24 P2 01 100.97 3 0.08 1056.89 cf �A Dean Nough a Phone: 425 335 0262 FAX: 425 335 0262 ASSOC1810S emaik dddhough@juno.com �7 To: Mr Lyle Chrisman @Fax: 771 0221 From: Dean M Hough Date: August 15, 2003 Re: Magnolia Court - Detention volume Provided Pages: 8, including this According to George Hanna of A D Shapiro, Architects you need justification of detention volume to be provided in our latest revised plan submitted to you last week. I'm seeing a discrepancy on size of the 36" N12 pipes along the west property line. The plan size of pipe diameter is correct. The driveway profile has been changed to show 36" N12 pipe and also the pipe table for pipes P5 and P8 in has been changed to 36", not 24" N12 pipe. This will make the detention volume to meet the required volume. Because the pipe size was reconfigured, my design calculations have been changed for the.36" pipe and are attached. The elevations & sizing of orifices now agree with that shown on revised sheet 1/4 (attached). With this change noted above, the volume of detention provided in the driveway connector pipe of 8" diameter, 44 If of 36" N12 pipe in north sideyard and 82' altogether of 36" pipe along the west property line with catch basin and manholes is more than enough to meet design requires shown in the TIR of November of 2002 on page 4 of Appendix A for 349' of 24" pipe. If you have any questions, call me at 425 335 0262. Thanks, Dean Hough, PE PIPE DIAMETER (I N) CU FT/L FT. PIPE LENGTH (FT) VOLUME IN NEW UNIT (CF) 36 7.07 82 579.7 36 7.07 44 311 8 0.35 132 46.1 MHs-48 12.57 3.5' DEEP X 5 EA 132 TYPE1 CBs 5.33 CF X 3.5' DEEP 3 EA 52.5 TOTAL 1,121.2 CU FT PROVIDED VOL. ORIGINAL = 24" DIA 3.14 349 1,096.4 CU FT REQUIRED VOL. r*2tMeJ �q rw Tz&a--�w 111'r pA DEAN HOUGH & ASSOC SSTRIEr E711 IATE 8918 1 Ith St NE rV CA) Everett WA 98205-1407 A3' Phone & Fax: 425-335-0262 .................................................................................................................... CONSTRUCTION PLAN TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT OAS for City of Edmonds V'i MAGNOLIA COURT TOWNHOMES at 21501 80th Av W .............................................................. I ..................................................... For Mr Lyle Chrisman, Program Coordinator Public Works Department City of Edmonds, WA Owner: Charlie Nathan/Nalund Construction Prepared by Dean M Hough, PE July 19, 2002 CITY COPY SEP 13 2002 BUILDING DEPT. 4F 0 This T. 1. R. is submitted along with the four construction plans for the drainage/grading of a 6 unit apartment complex in the City of Edmonds addressed as 21501 80th Av W for Charlie Nathan of Nalund Construction Co. This SEPA grading permit application is to comply with City of Edmonds grading, requirements and the drainage is to comply with City Development Code, Chapter 18.30 and City of Edmonds drainage ordinance requirements. Part I The Project Proposal A. Existing Conditions This project is to obtain permits for grading 'and providing storm drainage and utility improvements for an apartment complex site just west of the Edmonds-Woodway High school field. The site is a single family residence with about 25 tall fir trees in the backyard and which is fenced with 14' high laurel hedge and accessed with a circular gravel driveway. The existing home will be removed to make way for the development. It is situated on the east side of 80th Av W about 200' north of 216th St SW. The site slopes from west to east about 5' feet in about 150' or at 3.3% slope. To fit the two triplex units on the site, the foundations will be lowered about 3' into the sloping hill. Mr Tony Shapiro of ADS Architects is the architect and applicant for this project. This apartment complex will take access off 80th Av W using a central driveway that will drop down to make access to the common level garages which front onto the east/West driveway. To provide grade accommodations, three 3' rockeries or retaining walls will be used along the front of the development, go half way along the north and south property lines and at the east end of the driveway to match grade at the east property line. A SEPA checklist for this development will be submitted by ADS Architects. A review of the site shows a hill sloping east away from 80th Av. The neighboring lot to the south is a dental office building and the lots north and across the street are residential, single family developments of the last 40 years. Eightieth Av W rises going north to about 160' south of 212th St Sw centerline to a crest and from there a number of catch basins on the west side of 80th provide provide drainage which continues past site to 216th St and then goes east on 76th Av; south in 76th to 220th, east in 220th under Hwy 99 4F . 0 and into Halls Lake ravine. A number of 24" detention pipes line the central driveway and also front the west property line along 80th Av W. The foundation drains will bypass the restrictor manhole on the south to join the proposed outlet pipe downstream of the detention system and then cross 80.th Av to join an existing CB. The drainage easement will encumber the full access driveway where a double detention pipe is located. Also 10'of the 15'plus front setback is also for placing and servicing the detention/storm drain system. The apartment configuration is this - that the first floor is at elevation 102.0 and drops 6 inches into the garage. From the living space the patios will be accessed with 3 steps of 6" to a common patio elevation of 100.5. The backyard of all units will be flat at elevation 100.5 to provide venting air space. As can be seen in Section B-B drainage going east along the natural grade drops further over an approximate 3 to 4' retaining wall which extends into the front face of both apartment buildings as seen in page 4b. The backyards will be flat except for the east end of the east units to drain into the east property line. B. Offsite Analysis The upstream area will be discussed in Part 11 Section B for Conveyance Analysis. Going downstream from the site, the existing storm drain goes south along the east side of 80th Av W and goes subsurface in a 12" pipe to an existing CB, called CB#2 as shown on DHA plan #1/4 The proposed detention system will drain west and south to the existing CB#2, then continue south in the existing system. After joining one more CB at the north side of 215th PI, it goes diagonally southwest to begin a storm drain trunk in the center of the road and continues south. In the next major intersection of 80th with 216th St SW, there are two manholes which redirect flows east along the centerline of 216th St. There are about 19 catch basins north of the site and one manhole which make up the storm drain system north of the site leading up to 212th St SW. There is a north/south crest about 200' west of 80th Av and this system picks up storm flows as seen in the DHA Drainage Basin Map on page 1 B. In other words per the map about 4 acres of residential yards and about 14 houses are picked up. From the crest the maximum flow time is for sheet flow from the northwest to the 213th PI intersection, and then drains south in the approximate 20 catch basins and manhole which then meets the existing CB in about 643.5 feet of pipe. DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIATES 15-Jul-02 HYDROGRAPH IMPUT CALCULATION TABLE: Magnolia Court Apartnitnts - 6 units In City of Edmonds ADDRESS: 21601 SM Av W IMPERVIOU31PERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS DARTMENTS DRNIEWAY -'ATIOS misc. LOT NO. LENGTH WIDTH TOTAL AREA LENGTH WIDTH TOTAL AREA LENGTH WIDTHI TOTAL AREA LENGTH WIDTH TOTALAREAIREMARKS 1 39.5 27.75 1096.125 140 24.5 3430 12 7 84 PER AU 01 2 39.5 27.75 1096.125 (PER AUTOCAD) 0 12 7 84 PER AU D) 1546 1 FRONTAGE IMPROV. 3 39.5 27.75 1096.125 (PER AUTOCAD) 0 12 7 84 PER AU D) 0 4 39.5 27.75 1096A25 (PERAUTOCAD) 0 `12 7 84 PER AU AD) 0 5 39.5 27.75 '1096.125 (PER AUTOCAD) 0 12 7 84 PER AU 0 6 39.5 27.75 1096.125 (PER AUTOCAD) 0 12 7 84 PER AU 0 buc i v i AL wrr-mv. owmr^�c IMPERVIOUSIPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS: EXISTING CONDITIONS LENGTH( I WIDTH JTOTALAREAJ\ LENGTH I WIDTH TOTAL AREA 271 15121 QER AUTOCAD) 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 bUt$ I U I AL IMMKV. 0UKrpk%,r- BASIN PERVIOUS AREAS = TOTAL BASIN AREA LESS IMPERN SITE + FRONT. IMPROV- APTs - DRIVEWAYSIPATIC DEV. BASIN A= 16546.00 6576.75 39' EX. SITE = 16646.00 1612 12= 1.5r L10= 2.(Y' USE dn = 81 FOR TYPE CSSOIL - ALDERWOOD URBAN LAN USE Cn = 90 FOR TYPE C SOIL - ALDERWOOD URBAN = NOTE: THE ABOVE DATA IS PLUGGED INTO WATERWSDRK Hydi220i.1231 SITE AREA = 150 100 SITE+IMPROV. - _JEEE_��U) AREAS SUCH AS ROOFS AND MISC.(ACCESS ROAD AREAS) NOTED IN ABOVE TABLES. ROAD TOTALSQFT TOTAL ACRES PERVIOUS IMP AREA IN ACRES 1646.00 4489.25 0.103 ACRE 0.277 ACRE 0.00 1503-4.00 0.345 ACRE 0.035 ACRE U00 3.(Y' MPLEX COMPLEX S SOFTWARE TO GET HYDROGRAPHS IN APPENDIX A PAGE I & 2. PAGE 2A <�, � ko�j-3-o- F rQ Is -5 4A r ,\ C(011,� S 15000 SQ FT 16546 SO FT 16 The downstream flow was established by field searching the 1500 feet south and east to 76th Av W. In this reach the storm drain continues east as a trunk along the centerline of 216th St SW using about 7 manholes about 5 to 6' deep. This drainage system services the football field and the cul de sac streets that are south of 216th st. The field visit and "popping" of manhole covers showed flow in 76th Av W continuing south to 220th St and the City of Edmonds utility map shows flow going east in 220th across Highway 99 to join the Creek leading to Halls Lake. As a result of this the City's Ordinance #18.30 was adhered to and a detention system that detains the 2, 10 and 100 year-24 hour storms is provided here. See Part 11, Section A for the detention system design. The soils map as shown on page 2a by SCS shows that the site is mostly in type C soil and is typed as Alderwood Urban Land Complex, 2 to 8% sloping. The soil is drainable, but is only shallow to about 24 to 36" deep before the soil consolidates into glacial till. Part 11 Drainage Design for the Grading Plan A. Detention Design Calculations A calculation of impervious surfaces for both existing and developed conditions to determine the detention volume for the 2, 10 and 100 year storm for the apartment development is shown on page 213, the Hydrograph Input Calculation Table. The above noted table shows that the impervious will include the driveway, apartment buildings and street improvement areas and that the existing condition involves second growth forest of alders with no impervious surface other than the existing house. The area of the frontage improvements including sidewalk and street widening was determined by Autocad. Also on this table the storm intensities for the City of Edmonds is listed. The curve numbers of 98 and 81 for impervious and second growth forest were used here. After development the Cn rises to 90 for 50 to 75% grass on this type C soil. The route that water travels on site is indicated on page 1 of Appendix as sheet flow from the west property line of the site going somewhat on a diagonal and east to the east property line for 160 feet through second growth forest at 3.1 % slope. The actual flow time for this small site becomes 38 minutes by the time it gets to the east property line. The Waterworks software determines the peak 100 year storm peak flow on site in Basin A by creating 3 4P 0 six hydrographs See page I and 2 of Appendix A. The Waterworks calculations shows that there is about 0. 14 cfs increase in the 100 year - 24 hour peak in storm flow. It should be noted that the time for concentration for developed conditions will have a higher impervious area and therefore, developed flows will be faster off site than the existing conditions. With the minimum standard time of 10 minutes, the hydrograph for the developed conditions is maximum and will provide the greatest possible difference and amount of storm flow to detain to protect the existing downstream structures. The calculation of detention calls for 349' of 24" diameter pipe; therefore, the 324' of 24" diameter pipe provides 1018 cu. Ft and the volume in the three type 11 manholes which is not included in the Waterworks calculations provides the remaining 75 cu ft needed to fulfill required volume. The 3 type 1 L catch basins volume would also provide more volume and provides a little more safety factor for this system. B. Culvert Conveyance Analysis To check available capacity of the pipe going from the existing CB#2 south, the full developed 100 year-24 hour storm flow of 0.23 cfs is combined at CB#2 to test that downstream pipe. Also the complete system of 3 pipes is checked to make sure that the flows in these pipes will not overflow CB rims of in the culverting system. The upstream area which contributes flow to the storm drain system is the 4.06 acres of residential area along both sides of 80th av W and west for about 150'. The onsite flow of Al 00dev of 0.23 cfs is added at CB#2 to test the downstream pipe, P1. . , A Waterworks Software network of pipes was made up and are seen on page 4B. Pipe P2 goes from C132 to CB4 and pipe, P2A, goes from CB#3 to CB#2. These two flow basins combine to test pipe, P1, with 2.33 cfs. The parameters that were used here are for future development. Full developed conditions was used which requires a Cn of 90 for C type soil and goes to 98 for impervious areas. A time of concentration of 10 minutes was used in the study. This provides a flow of 2.33 cfs and test pipe of 12" at 2.14% slope shows only 38% of capacity used. This piping system through the 80th Av W storm drain should be more than adequate at !2" diameter and as laid out. Note that on page 3 of appendix B, the hydraulic grade line, HGL1 and 2 show that all four CBs will not be overtopped with the combined 1 00yr-24hr storm flows; therefore this system is adequate. See DHA plan C2 for the drainage system layout. 4 PrApr LO �o YI ta Vv. i 10� BEGIN TIME FLOW LINE L=154.8' 0 1.29% SHEET:GRASS & PIPE LENGTH=643.8' 01.551a)%. Ln V) 3: 3: (A n U) V) C-4 04 CB#2 CB#1'Di)M Y) 80TH AV W �-CB#4 CB#3 BASIN A 4.06 ACRES DRAINAGE BASIN MAP PROJECT SITE NOT TO SCALE DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIATES V-,� s- P2; C22016SN.DWG 7/13/02 PAGE 1 OB I 71 Waterworks Printouts: A. Detention Design Calculations page 1 -6 B. Culvert Conveyance Analysis page 1-6 Pnwkupfiohm&%wkMordpm/:c2201RFrr.LWP 7/15102 7/15/02 12:8:41 am Dean Hough & Associates page 1 CITY OF EDMONDS.6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... RAINFALL TYPE .... PRECIPITATION .... TIME INTERVAL .... NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR EX 0.38 Acres TYPElA 1.50 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA. . : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.35 Acres 81.00 38.19 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313 PEAK RATE: 0.02 cfs VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min BASIN ID: A10 SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... RAINFALL TYPE .... PRECIPITATION .... TIME INTERVAL .... NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR EX 0.38 Acres TYPElA 2.00 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA. . : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.35 Acres 81.00 38.19 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313 PEAK RATE: 0.04 cfs VOL: 0.02 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min BASIN ID: A100 SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... RAINFALL TYPE .... PRECIPITATION .... TIME INTERVAL .... NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:100YR EX 0.38 Acres TYPEIA 3.00 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA. . : C14 .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.35 Acres 81.00 38.19 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313 PEAK RATE: 0.09 cfs VOL: 0.04 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min BASIN ID: A100DEV SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... RAINFALL TYPE .... PRECIPITATION .... TIME INTERVAL .... (0 IM 90/.3 Acres .00 10.00 min (0 Ml 0;/0'3 Acre s 9 .00 10.00 min /10, 0 1 0/3 Acres 9 .00 10. 00 min NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:100YR DEV. 0.38 Acres TYPElA 3.00 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA. . : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.10 Acres 90.00 10. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.23 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min IMP 0.28 Acres 98.00 10.00 min 7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean Hough & Associates page 2 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A10DEV NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR DEV. SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 2.00 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres 0.28 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 90.00 98.00 TC .... : 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.14 cfs VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME:, 500 min BASIN ID: A2DEV NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:2YR DEV. SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 1.50 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres 0.28 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 90.00 98.00 TC .... : 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.10 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min 0 7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean Hough & Associates page 3 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0.016 980 1494'cf 0.38 2 0.037 630 2126 cf 0.38 3 0.090 560 3419 cf 0.38 7�1 7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean CITY OF EDMONDS 6 ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W Hough & Associates page 4 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST UVDERGROUND PIPE ID No. P1 Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE, P1 Diameter: 2.00 ft. Length: 349.00 ft. Slope ... : 0.0000 ft/ft upstr: dnstr: 0 7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean Hough & Associates page 5 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 01 Description: ORIFICE COMBINED STRUCTURE,01 Outlet Elev: 98.40 /� Elev: 96.40 ft— Orifice Diameter: 0.7632 in. Elev: 99.50 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 1.4883 in. Elev: 99.70 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 1.2539 in. 7/15/02 12:8:46 am Dean Hough & Associates page 6 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE < -------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (cfs) (Cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id (cfs) VOL (cf) 2YR STORM DESIGN ............. 0.02 0.10 Pl 01 99.41 1 0.02 556.07 cf 10YR STORM DESIGN ............ 0.04 0.14 Pl 01 99.60 2 0.04 688.75 cf 100YR STORM DESIGN ........... 0.09 0.23 PI 01 100.05 3 0.09 968.21 cf 1:4000 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 1 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 BOTH AV W APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN:100YR-24HR BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: AlOODEV NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10OYR DEV. SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres 0.28 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 90.00 98.00 TC .... : 10.00 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.23 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: A -CONVEY NAME: BASIN A FOR 100YR24HR CONVEY. SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : 4.06 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION .... : 3.00 inches AREA..: 2.54 Acres 1.52 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 90.00 98.00 TC .... : 26.24 min 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 154.80 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0129 TcReach - Channel L: 643.80 kc:42.00 s:0.0155 PEAK RATE: 2.10 cfs VOL: 0.75 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min 0 0 7/13/02 6:2:50 pm. Dean Hough & Associates page 2 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 2.330 510 35952 cf 4.44 2 0.034 650 2126 cf 0.38 3 0.083 580 3419 cf 0.38 0 Go 7/13/02 6:2:50 pm CITY OF ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE Dean EDMONDS 6 W Hough & Associates page 3 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO DESIGN 100YR-24HR REACH SUMMARY Hydraulic Gradeline for Reach HGL1 <-FROM-> <--TO--> <FLOW) floss Ent_HGL EntLoss ExtLoss OutLet Inlet AppHead BndHead JunHead HeadWtr -cb/mb- -------- -------- efs -loss- -Elev-- --loss- --loss- --Elev- --Elev- --loss- --loss- --loss- --Elev- --Rim-- CB#1 96.95 CB#2 CB#1 2.33 1.62 tw & dn <dc: Inlet Ctrl Assumed 98.63 0.11 0.00 0.01 98.53 102.97 CB#4 CB#2 2.10 2.06 tw & dn dc: Inlet Ctrl Assumed 100.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.63 105.70 Hydraulic Gradeline for Reach HGL2 c-FROM-> <--TO--> <FLOW> floss Ent_RGL EntLoss ExtLoss OutLet Inlet AppHead BndHead JunHead HeadWtr -cb/mh- -------- -------- cfs -loss- -Elev-- --loss- --loss- --Elev- --Elev- --loss- --loss- --loss- --Blev- --Rim-- CB#2 98.32 CB#3 CB#2 0.23 0.28 98.60 0.00 0.00 98.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.60 104.20 Network Reach N1 REACH <-AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n ) DSGK Q % PIPE Ndepth %Depth Vact Vfull C-Area ID (Ad (f t) (ft) ft/ft ------ (cfs) ------ (f t) ------ (fps) (fps) P2A 4.06 1.00 155.05 0.0133 0.0120 2.10 43 .73 0.48 48.25 5.59 6.27 A_CONVEY Confluence with Network N2 P1 4.44 1.00 75.73 0.0214 0.0120 2.33 38.27 0.45 44.70 6.86 7 .96 Network Reach N2 REACH <-AREb <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q % PIPE Ndepth IDepth Vact Vfull C-Area ID (Ad (ft) (ft) ft/ft ------ (cfs) ------ (ft) ------ (fps) (fps) P2 0.38 1.00 56.73 0.0049 0.0120 0.23 7.95 0.20 19.77 2.11 3.82 A100DEV PIPE REACH From: CB#2 To: Pipe Diameter: Pipe Length Up invert Collection Area: Design Flow Pipe Capacity Design Vel Pipe Full Vel ID No. P1 CB#1 1.0000 ft 75.7280 ft 98.1200 ft 4.4400 Ac. 2.3300 cfs 6.0890 cfs 6.8570 fps 7.9564 fps n: 0.0120 s: 0.0214 down invert: Dsgn Depth: Travel Time: 96.5000 ft 0.45 ft 0 . 18 min . 1 40 0 7/13/02 6:2:51 pm. Dean Hough & Associates page 4 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR REACH SUMMARY PIPE REACH ID No. P2 From: CB#3 To: CB#2 Pipe Diameter: 1.0000 ft n: 0.0120 Pipe Length 56.7339 ft s: 0.0049 Up invert 98.4000 ft down invert: 98.1200 ft Collection Area: 0.3800 Ac. Design Flow 0.2326 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.20 ft Pipe Capacity 2.9246 cfs Design Vel 2.1146 fps Travel Time: 0.45 min Pipe Full Vel 3.8216 fps PIPE REACH ID No. P2A From: CB#4 To: CB#2 Pipe Diameter: 1.0000 ft n: 0.0120 Pipe Length : 155.0483 ft s: 0.0133 Up invert : 100.1800 ft down invert: 98.1200 ft Collection Area: 4.0600 Ac. Design Flow 2.0984 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.48 ft Pipe Capacity 4.7986 cfs Design Vel 5.5929 fps Travel Time: 0.46 min Pipe Full Vel 6.2703 fps 7/13/02 6:2:51 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 5 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR STRUCTURE REPORT EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#1 Location : DOWNSTREAM CB(DUMMY) @215PL SW North Str Type : East Str Cat : Catch Basin Rim Elev Area/sump: 4.00 sf/1.50 ft Bottom El: Cont Area: Hgrade El: Bend ..... : No special shape Ent type.: Area/sump: Ent Loss: 0.000 Exit: 0.000 App Vel: 0.000 Junct: Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End> Pi 96.500 12.00 0.012 Lower EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#2 Location : CB#2 S/W OF SITE;W SIDE 80TH Str Type : TYPE 1 Str Cat : Catch Basin Area/sump: 4.00 sf/1.50 ft Cont Area: Bend ..... : No special shape Ent type.: Area/sump: Ent Loss: 0.027 Exit: 0.137 App Vel: North East Rim Elev Bottom El: Hgrade El: 1655.9930 1964.2850 102.0000 95.0000 96.9470 ft 0.000 Bend: 0.000 1731.7210 1964.2850 102.9700 96.6200 98.3177 ft 0.111 Junct: 0.010 Bend: 0.000 Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End> Pi 98.120 12.00 0.012 Upper P2 98.120 12.00 0.012 Lower P2A 98.120 12.00 0.012 Lower PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#3 Location : CB#3 ON SITE RESTRICTOR CB(II) North Str Type : TYPE 2-54 East Str Cat : Catch Basin Rim Elev Area/sump: 15.90 sf/4.00 ft Bottom El: Cont Area: A100DEV Hgrade El: Bend ..... : No special shape Ent type.: Area/sump: Ent Loss: 0.000 Exit: 0.001 App Vel: 0.000 Junct: Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End> P2 98.400 12.00 0.012 Upper 1748.2850 2018.5470 104.2000 94.4000 98.5993 ft 0.000 Bend: 0.000 7/13/02 6:2:51 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 6 CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR STRUCTURE REPORT EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#4 Location : CB#4 UPSTREAM @ N/215TH ST SW North 1886.7690 Str Type : TYPE 1 East 1963.9630 Str Cat : Catch Basin Rim Elev 105.7000 Area/sump: 0.00 sf/4.00 ft Bottom El: 96.1800 Cont Area: A —CONVEY Hgrade El: 100.6344 ft Bend ..... : No special shape Ent type.: Area/sump: Ent Loss: 0.022 Exit: 0.111 App Vel: 0.000 Junct: 0.000 Bend: 0.000 Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End> P2A 100.180 12.00 0.012 Upper REC'7714"VED JU f�, !� - -32 CITY OF EDMONDS - - J - SEPA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALySISEVELOPIAE,;,Vi��-'�:,�ERVICES Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant: t\jAiNNti Name 1-19 2-- cpmomb�, W a- 2,gog, Street/Mailing Address vvA 17go2o city State zip Telephone: A Z-,G— -74 / - :7 2-4 0 Applicant Contact Person: ,::::J62t4�F, +1PN1J19 Name AfAIA) —,-T. AC Street/Mailing Address jl��—T)q,OAJDL k3JA city , State zip Telephone: 12- 5 - -7 -7,0 - 5.4 0 0 Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis: Firm Name 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Contact Name Telephone a. Street address Qfknown): 2,150 AQ AVE. w ,xP �4olj Oc, Vi A ff 8o 2A MIN . . . . . . . . -E (Attach a vicinity map and siteplan.) c. Specify existing land use: J=ANU^ V4MSC—_ d. Specify proposed type and size of development: 2— 15TpQ Tokyu -rol-AL- 80--e---A'FsepriaLI�7L 6-75o 51F. e. When will the project begin construction and when will it be completed? i51612--T F-A U— 2c>,p2 f Define proposed access locations: dj-�— e FIL-- 1,o -T Q f2;2 A W— g. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: S s, PW I 2. TRIP.GENERATION a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT AM - 2 -4 b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: — Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT 4A- 2 -1 . . 450 .1 2- f HVLTI-FAM7-L�- ,CUfJ7—T—S —F,-rokL— 11 1 OPASCE -0 upa$ 1 1, TF LU �f T- - c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak!Hour Trips IN OUT v&T "e &k3 C-1 d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link-(hv6rted or passby trips: Ain ,gr-nJ T A Page 2 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prei7e and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments 4. SITE'ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have skght distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection teyel of Service Analysis: • Existmg.L;on(litions LOS • Year of Opening LOS • Five Years Beyond I LOS (Intersections to be eval c. Describe channehzation Delays Delays of Land Use Delays tall be determined by the City ofEdmonds Traffic Engineer.) I d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate�,�O% and 95 % queuing lengths): • Existing Conditions • Year of Opening • Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state stop sign and signal warrants: f. Summari e local accident history: (Attach striping plan.) 95% Page 3 TRAF VOLUMES Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts,. including turning movements, on street adjacent to and -directly impacted by the project. b. Describe�e estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open ( ith and without project traffic). 7 c. Describe the estimate&�DT and peak -hour counts, including. turning.movements, five years after the project has been fully o (with and without project traffic). P7 d. State annual background traffic gro�Nrth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and at the following documentation for each arterial street hour trips. Other City -planned developments must 9xistine LOS: Existing Condition: Year of Opening LOS: With P roject: - Without Project: i supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak- �,be factored into the LOS calculations. Page 4 0 0 Without Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: 7. MITIGATION RECOMAMNDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to nu i ate project specific traffic impacts. I 8. MINIMUM NHTIGATION REQUIREMENTS Residential developments that generate ten PM peak -hour trips or less will be required to pay a $200 per PM peak -hour trip fee. PM Peak -Hour Trips A — X $200 = $ g-9 A�P . ]>\My D - - - &F--WWV-ig\WXTrW1r*AfadyWo&d- Page 5 i "\4a\ a olia Courl, Townhomes I 2MI 80th Ave. . EAn=x6,WA 98026 lu, z 4-J 00 L C.5— x U E>C C.B. I+ DISK/F1LE No: 32SA0101 DATE: 06/24/02 W-011 NEW Cj5. DRAVINN BY: GSH CHECKED B) ADS -0 No.: I PROJECT No: REVISION/F 1 U325.00 T 5ACK 11614011 161401 39140" L 39140" �DASWED LINES INDICATE UNDER GROUND TANK 4 DRAIN SYSTEM ALL ON SITE IMPERVIOUS AREAS DRAIN TO DETENTION PIPE ANY SITE IMPROVEMENT CIB.'S —WOOD FENCE s 5ETWEEN UNITS TYP [SET 5ACK .391-611 T B n 8 -oil B C3 E3 8 ------------------------------- I., -------- F -------------------- f UNIT-1 qNI UNIT-3 7 --------- F- - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 L- J - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ --- --- IF --------- j --- 17, -------- L_ 2�1 (ET (0 T4_ ---------- LL Y UNIT-4 dfNff�� UNI T-6 ----------------------------- :11 ----------------- , ------------ --- Z'7 N89*33'45"W 0 B B 13 6 R 8 13 E3 a B SITE 111=20' itects ps arg-ni I- 600 Main Street, Sdite C Edmonds, WA W020-3079 425.778.5400 FAk 778.3032 SITE INFORMATION ZONE: RM 2.4 MaK WEIGPT 30' LOT COVERAGE 45% TO TAL SITE AREA: 15,OW SF. 034435 AC (o UNITS W1 2 PARKING STALLS ENCLOSED < BUILDIWG FOOTPRINT- 6,750 SF. PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE 45% Ist FLOOR AREA 6,326 SF. 2nd FLOOR AREA 6,750 SF. PROVIDED LANDSCAPE 5,000 SF. —TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 10,000 SF. K-1project-12325 Magnolia Cowt-Cad -Sch�duiea-32551reCalcx2a NOTES: EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGPT (EI) 2 PER UNIT LURALINE PL302WM, INCANDESCENT 10014, WITP MINIMUM LIGPT SPILL. VICINITY MAP: � NTS C14 In St. 212th St. SW 0 SITE 0 Ji. 21(oth St. 1, Wj7 216th Sw 215th StASW 9j 220th 5 . Sw 222nd St. SW 99 JOB NAME: Magnoha Court SHEET No. 1.1 C- -.1 CLIENT: ADDRESS: 7 M.,TCe Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc. WO T OF INPLACE DENSITIES BY NUCLEAR METHOD BUILDING C Nalund & Associates Dave Gorham 9792 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Report #D 4300 DATE: September 17, 2003 PROJECT: Magno1ia-Court----------._ PROJECT LOCATION:�.2LM55.119011TA e'WaRcr 7- PROJECT#: _0SB__Mh4 -1 PERMIT #: 03-0549 / 03-0550 WORK / LOCATION: Storm sewer road crossing (2.5'wide, 4-5'deep, 8" SDR-35 PVC) and sanitary sewer trench backfill adjacent to manhole. INPL.AtL DENSITY TEST RESULTS OSTM b,2'922 & D-�017) TEST MODE/ DEPTH LOCATION 'ELEV. DRY DENSITY MOIST. % COMP. % REQ'D % 8 road crossing E lane SG 132.3 6.9 1 96 95 2 8 road crossing W lane SG 131.0 5.9 1 95 95 3 8 road crossing pothole at road center line SG A 30.7 1 95 95 4- 8- road crossing pothole backfill at road.center line SG 130.7-- -8.8 6.1 1 95 95 5 8 5' E of manhole at property entrance SG-8" 132.3 6.9 1 96 95 TEST METHOD: Q ASTM D-698/ AASHTO T-99 0 ASTM D-1557 AASHTO T-180 *1 SAMPLE#: 031925 DESCRIPTION:-5/8" CSTC Rinker PROCTOR VALUE: 138.0 @ 6.6 *2 SAMPLE #: DESCRIPTION: PROCTOR VALUE: ,*3 SAMPLE #: DESCRIPTION: PROCTOR VALUE: 1*4 SAMPLE #: DESCRIPTION: PROCTOR VALUE: IGAUGE STANDARD: MS- 643 - DS-2422 JEQUIPM' ENT I.D. AND S/N (as applicable): 343013/19828 1 NATIVE SOILS IMPORTED FILLS SOILS CONSISTENT WITH PROCTOR Yes 10 No El SOILS FOUND TO BE FIRM AND STABLE AND TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE MEET COMPACTION - Yes No M CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED OF RESULTS Yes 0 No Z REMARKS: MTC was present on site as requested by the client. A sample was taken on site and percentage will be back calculated when laboratory results are known. George Sanders, Geotechnical REPORTED BY: Inspector REVIEWED BY: .-Brian Steele, L.E.G. DISTRIBUTION: original: Client cc: City of Edmonds cc: cc: cc: cc: tall 10cmiOns and oustaials lWacl. M a mutual protoulion to clients, the "ic mul ourstiveN all mWrts = submillad N the cartildcruial pmpcny ofdicnM mW outhorhani(all fm Publiculion ofigalt"cals. conclusions or =trx-ts flont or rcltording our wrinco approval. 777 Chrysler Drive Burlington, Wa. 98233 Phone (j60) 755-1990 0 Fax (360) 755-1980 1710 Midway Court Centralia, Wa. 98531 Phone (360) 330-7926 9 Fax (360) 330-7946 Website Address: www.mtc-inc.net Rev. 07/01 Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc. Proctor Report Project: Magnolia Cow Date Sampled: 17-Sep-03 ASTM C-136 Project N: 03BM241 Sampled By: G. Sanders Visual Identification Sieve Size Percent Specifications Client: Natland & Assoc. Date Tested: 18-Sep-03 CSTC US mm Pawing Mal Min Source: Rinker Tested By: V Duran 6.00" 150.0 100.0% 0.0% Sample#: 031925 4.00" 3.00" 100.0 75.0 100.0% 100,0% 0.0% 0.0% Sample Prepared: Moist: Manual: Dry: X Mechanical: X 2.50" 63.0 100.0% 0.0% Test Standard: AASHTO T 99; AASHTOT 180; Method 2.00" 50.0 100.0% 0.0% ASTM D 698: ASTM D 1557: X C 1.75" 1.50" 45.0 37.5 100.0% 100,0% 0.0% 0.00/0 Uncorrected Proctor Value Assumed Sp. Gr. Point Percent Dry Max. Dry Density Optimum Moist. 1.25" 31.5 100.0% 0.0% 2.75 Number Moisture Density 13&0 lbs1fe 6.6% 1.00" 25.0 100.0% 0.0 ON 1 2.3% 132.2 7/8" 22.4 100.0% 0.0% 2 4.5% 136.6 Value w/ Oversize Correction Applied 3/4" 19.0 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 3 6.5% 138.1 Mm Dry Density Optimum Moist. 518" 16.0 100.0% 0�0 % 4 9.4% 137.0 NiA lh�fe 1/2" 12.5 91.8%. 100.0% 0.0% 3/8" 1/4" 9.5 6.3 76.2% 62.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Moisture Density Relationship #4 4.750 55.9 % 100.0% 0.0% 140.0 -------- --------- ........... ---------------------- ...... ---------- -------- ------- ----------- ........... ------- ------------------ ------------ - 136.0 ---------------- ------------ ------------------------- --------- ------------------ --- ----------- -------- ------ ........ ----------- ------------ ---------- 132.0 ........... ------ -- ------- ----------- ------- ---- - - - - - - - - --- - - - . . .. . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.7 - - - - - - 130.0 . 0% % 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 3% 9% Percent Moisture Data Points Zero Air Voids Curve Curve Fit Specs: Meets Specs? Yes No Specs ASTM D-4718, Misc. Oversize Correction Values % Retained 3/4" 0.0% % Retained Corrected Optimum % Retained Corrected Optimum %Gravel: 44. 1 % D(Io): 3/4" Sieve Density Moisture 3/4" Sieve Density Moisture % Sand: 5% 139.4 6.3% 20% 143.7 5.4% silt&Clay: loo/o 140.8 6.0% 25% 145.2 5.1% cc: LL: n/a 15% 142.2 5.7% 30% 146.7 4.8% CJ;: PL: n/a FM: Pl: n/a -- ftw En aming Tmitnical services PS, 1996-98 Comments: Reviewed by: All rmilli apply oWy to smW lorAtoo:i ad malwals Iftlea As a --tuW PlUttaiDu to dirols. the POW; and owsdvm all npDru are subatittod = the =r1dcwW PFOPony Ofclicm&% mW mabonmim ror publkation Of stalcment% conultodow or cumu Item or rclgarding oOt, rrporu is rcmvod Pakfing = w1iffm aMoval. 777 Chrysler Drive a Burlington, WA 98233 * Phone (360) 755-1990 9 Fax (360) 755-1980' 1710 Midway Court 9 Centralia, WA 98531 a Phone (360) 330-7926 o Fax (360) 330-7946 Website Address: www.mtc-inc.net 0 NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information'shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s-). Any person or entity -requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on tFe -map(s), including, but not limited to, the loc'ation of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may'not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its emp-1-o-yees or officerS Shall be I'-1aL--j--11-e for the information given on this map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS 0 OWNER............................................... ............. ADDRESS .... .......... (-,—) ....... ............................. I .......... ....... ........ EASEMENT No . .......................................... CONTRACTOR .............. ............... ---------------- PERMIT No. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No... ................ ........................... BL0CK No . ............................................ I NAMEOF ADDITION ................................................... ................... ................................................................. RECEIVED ri E c -D 1914 e 0 1,-- 0 :51-42-�' -77 Approved: DATE............................................. — By ...................................................................... APPLICATION Tke City of Edmonds,_,. for EASEMENT NO . ..... ...................................... SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION F-1 REPAIRS F� LID A - OWNER --------_--------------_- .......... ..... RMI- -NO --- --_--------------- ------------------------------------------------ C . ...... . . .... .. PE T 1JOB ADDRESS .......... :m -------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO-. __ ................. t..P -----_--- BLOCK NO. _ ................................. XTION __2�71- IF, 7' 1/4 ...... �4 DEE� Approved: DATE "40 ---------- Y:>-z ..... - ----- / ........... By 1�4w - V �Ic E Ml M 4:S[DE.'-,-,SEWER_,. R R T" F `,lDiM, NDS',,' !TY.. WAT SEWE1f�D&AATM1kk-f % JT PE RM, -.:j�all ...775-21,�,..5 for, side.. se��e In ons 1IFFORE. covering Ahe�z I nspecti ..any. portiom c?�struct.on X,, j Atqspe�ction will 7b6' provided �%v thin, 24 hours after'r�qust. 'e)r* holl��y- A -�Q'k`CON�S' T%-RU"CT I QJ�L ................... ......... .. ........ : ....... *.. .5(',1'. A' r- q f. ...................................... ................................... feet -of ,,I. EdAL IJ E S_ C R I Pn 0 N ......................... ............................ .... ...................................... PROPEkT, M-31 .,..I V ................. ........ * ......... ....... 1 2,� W-- 1 1/4 7-1 ................... ............................................. fit 114 - - 1 Nr ......................................................... ........................ ............................ ...................... ................... z R THIR PJ%1QERS0,,N-�, ............. .. . ............... ;.O-AVNER-.AND/OR,,BUII.;DER.'...:,!:I ..... ................................................ ............ ........... ................. ......... t ace., E' AJI)DRES t ......... ................... ................................ ....... ...................................... "C 'R,:iiCT-0h!�,,M6i'&,: s..: 1�1. t-6.r S p 0�i a I i sts . .21'� 52n*dW.-, J ufi,tl al,'e. Ter�.` . . ................. 1SS1on*,.,,s,.,jian,,t�a- _m er ............................................ : ......... 19: .......... e /or-conhef-ti n -C s -accor ance with. ond Ity'o'VEdfif s4rdi es."' inane A:I-.,,N.TION:--IS'PAI,,]�ED,:,To. THE. FOLLOWING., L ,'',6�NOTE-,No.�:1*--Yfi�-�"e�s..o'f:.,the' property- may obtain a permit to'con�truct-s,�wer lnslde� property. line. -A licensed Side Sewer. Contractor must be:emPloyed'to;const - ru�t , _�sibe sewerAri st reet a�ea. . Do' not,cover: any poit lon. of sewer before it' has been:InsIiect ed. 2" �rf6r�ed�i%h city right'of4ay. r P� e q I utreslan. Inv.asion,c;f Right -of�Way.Perinit'obtairi-able'ftorA the.Cit� Engi Tk NOTE461,11 No' 3± �Qlitalnzfbll'in or Ordinanci 11. 16:030. and 'Rlegulatto6s g6verning.'slile scwers when you get permit. !pation regarding, . -NOTE No. - i 4!� 'of' side ust :ha�e: at, least 30:111ches c' -.p operty Ine; -gr de7i5f�2-�,� -No, �Atis- in E! o. overage.at. r line and 12 Inches in e property .1 minimum a ba I . .. — s. q�harperi.!�a!j- will e permitted- z. --settled and.surfdce of -street; restore& 'to,o 6nt ractors :shai ],be 'responsible for fal . lu - re due �to, Im' NOT ' E No' -5�'— ,finlitreet:mus� be'wafer . Flginal condition. C. p p one- yea��of completion;' work 'the: permit.' or to.' o,any. work, on - th iie w* e r 6 s appurtenances', exm)t to An-' .7 NOTEY No:-. i6:LIt is unLaw!ul-,to..alt r- o any 'o�the than, for- in Ii- Ant- he wYe:. d e� main rit E��r c�plpe _76 j ........ ....... ...... ........ ............................ ... _77 bigAxpizOVED Date ... . ..... -Dale B, ........ By... Dafe.' ... .......... -AP J, ktk ... ... .... ..... ...... ......... ............. .. . ................ .......... - .................................................. S .. ............... ................................................................... ....... .............................. ....... ............................ .. ...... -V1 . .......... ............... ...................................... .......................... : ............................................ . .................... -C t �'�L,BOTIFF?efffiitl opies-MUST: e� ign�, :By*_q,�q�l�.,�.M.-'-Tir�fi P,6i;fdi:i��p'k.,',-,(��iis��.u�cti�p,.PRIOR.Tb'R6ques or:- nspectibn.-�—: y; ; A' 'h �d �We t- I' rifflt e i e-s r ins ai ati& , c . Qnstrijeted;'�und6r-IhWpe t din6nds. U ... ... ..... da *..o ........................... . ............ . . ......... __ _ y COORDINATE IRR16ATION 5)"5TEM INITH FENOIN6 BETNEEN UNIT5 - TYPICAL P.O.G. AT 5/4" IRRIOATION NATER METER 5EE GIVIL DRAININ65 � 15.0 � � q.0 � 15 15 '15 '15 15 5EE ARGHITF-GTURAL PRANINC-75 FOR SITE FENCING, NALL5, BUILDIN& LAYOUT AND LOCATION, CURBING, 516NA6E, AND LIGHTING. 2. 5EE ARCHITEGTURAL PRANIN65 FOR FINIA117 -.GONTROLLER LOGATION. 5. SEE ELE6TR16AL DRANIN65 OF 6ONTROLLER PONER 5OURGE. 4. SEE GIVIL DRANING5 FOR GRADING/ 5POT ELEVATION, AND CONTOUR LINES. 5. 5EE 5HEET L-2 FOR IRRI&ATION SCHEDULE AND DETAILS. AMS Landscape Architecture 1405 Northeast Katsura Street Issaquah, Washington 98029 Voice 245-681-6458 Fox 425-837-36el STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARC ITECT ART-HX M—. SEIDEL CERTIFICATE NO. 706 r r 00 N x 4 LL 0 0 Mr V) CIS r*_ 111t: Lo Cm NT CID too C 0 E v LU C) Mu'SIMS. MARK DESCRIP7.10N DATE BY ISSU. FOR PERMIT 9/12/02 AMS REVISION -1 12/16/02 AMS SHEET TME: LAND6(;AFl-.- IRRIGAT10N RECEIVED Fl.AN DEC 2 3 2002 PERMIT COUNTER SCAM: DRAWN BY- 111:1101-011 1 AMS DAXE: CHECKED BY: 09/12/2002 AMS PROJECT NO.: I FILE NAME: S.HEETNO.: IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION NTS PAVING FINISH SURFACE COMFAOT SUB GRADE SPECIFIED BACKFILL FINISH GRADE OR — TOP OF MULCH LAYER TOF9OIL FV6 LATERAL LINE F`V0 SCHEDULE 40 5LEEVIN6 FOR MAINLINE PVC SCHEDULE 40 9LEEVIN6 FOR CONTROL NIRIN6. FNIC, 'l--iAINLINE CONTROL NIRIN6 SLEE\/IN(7 AND TRENCHING NTS 5LEEVINC7 VALVE BOX CSALVANIZE MAINLINE FROM NATER SUPPLY 61 OBE SHUT -Orr VALVE FV6 MAINLINE FVC UNION FINISH GRADE OR Top OF MULCH LAYER PVC MAINLINE DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY ,JUMBO VALVE BOX TOP501L PVC MAINLINr- TO IRRIGATION SYSTEM VALVE Box EXTENSIONS FEA GRAVEL DRAIN ;z 7: 0 SOLID FVC CAP TYPICAL DO NOT GLUE - FAINT BLUE TEMPORARY FINISH GRADE OR TOP OF MULCH LAYER FAVIN6 - FINISH SURFACE COMPACT SUB GRADE TOPSOIL PVC, SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVE TYPICAL TEMPORARY SPECIFIED BACKFILL clo DEGREE ELL - TYPICAL UNDISTURBED NATIVESOIL FVC. SCHEDULE 40SLEEVE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER NTS < < :r < 0 -3 m 7- T REMOTE CONTROL VALVE NT5 5FRAY HEAD BUILDING HALL AUTOMATIC IRR16ATION CONTROLLER - NALL MOUNT 120 V FOkNER5OURCE BY OTHERS CONDUIT NALL STRAP - TYPICAL FV0 CONDUIT FOR CONTROLLER NIRES 51ZE AS REOUIRED - FAINT TO MATCH VIAL.1- COLOR FINISH SURFACE OR FINISH GRADE OUTSIDE BUILDING FINISH 5URrACE PVC SNEEP ELL CONDUIT - SIZE AS REOUIRED - TO LANDSCAPE AREA FIN15H GRAVI!=- OR TOP OF MULOH LAYEF, FINISH5URFACE TOP90IL POP-UP 5FRAY HEAP MARLEX FITTN& 6FIRAL 13ARE3 FITTIN6 TYPIOAL FV0 Sc,HEDUJ_E 40 FIT7149 SKNry FIFL= (Ib" MAX) PVC, LATERAL LINE FIN15H GRADE OR TOP Or MULCH LAYER 24" LOOP Or EXCESS NIRE TYPICAL KATER TI&HT!5PLICE CONNECTOR TYFICAL VALVE BOX TOPSOIL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE PVC SCHEDULE 50 T.O.E. NIPPLE PVC SX5 CIO DEGREES PVC MAINLINE NIPPLE CONTROL NIRE TYPICAL PVC SCHEDULE 40 FITTIN6 PVC MAINLINE PEA GRAVEL. DRAIN PVC LATERAL LINE < < U < < < N IL 0 QUIGK COUPLING VALVE N f5- IRR16ATION S6HEDULE FINISH GRADE OR TOP Or MULCH LAYER VALVE E30X 2" MAX. CLEAR FINISH SURFACE TOPSOIL OUICK COUPLING VALVE PEA GRAVEL DRAIN GALVANIZE NIPPLES PVC SCHEDULE 40 FITTIN6 CONTROL NIRES &ALVANIZESTREET ELL (5 TOTAL) PVC MAINLINE 5YMBOL 0150RIPTION F.5.1. RAPIU5 G.F.M. 0 15 RAINBIRD 006-5AM-M-151', 6" FOP -UP 5FRAY 50 15, a. -TO 15 RAINBIRV IbOb-5AM-Ff;L5-15H, 6" POP-UP 5FRAY 30 15, 1.65 L 15 RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-FRS-150, 6" FOP-UP!5FRAY 30 15, 0.13 15 RAIN131RD I5Ob-5AM-PR5-I5\/AN, 6' FOP -UP 5FRAY 50 15, 1.85 0 1.2 RAINBIRD 1506-5AM-FRS-12F, 6" FOF-UF5FRAY 50 12, 2.60 12 RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-M-12H, 611 POF-UP 5FRAY 50 12, 1.50 L 12 RAINBIRD lbob-5AM-M-120, b" POP-UP 5FRAY 50 12' 0.65 12 RAINBIRD Ibob-5AM-FR5-I2\/AN, b- POP-UP 5FRAY 50 12' 1.30 0 a RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-FIR5-61', 6" FOP -UP 5FRAY 50 1.05 e) RAINBIRD IbOb-5AM-FR5-aH, 6" POP-UP 5FRAy 30 L31 052 RAINBIRD 1506-5AM-M-80, 6" FOF-UP 5FRAY 30 bl 0.26 RAINBIRP 1606-5AM-PIP-6-WAN, 6" POF-UP5FRAY 30 61 1.15 El 55T RAINBIRD 1806-5AM-FR5-1555T, 6' FOP-UF5FRAY 150 1 4'x5O' 1 1.21 RAINBIRD 100-FE5, V REMOTE CONTROL \IALVE REMOTE CONTROL \/ALVE OALL-OUT CONTROLLER 5TATION NUMBER VALVE 51ZE GALLON5 PER MINUTE P4,oq rEErso 5/4" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE A55EMBLY IV CONTROLLER, K&LL MOUNT OUTSIDE BUILVIN6 RAINBIRD ESP-66LX, AUTOMATIC, 5EE ARCHITECTURAL DRMIN65 RAINBIRD 55Rr,, 5/4' WICK C.OUFLINC7 VALVE 'ED CLASS 200 FVC,, MAINLINE -51ZE AS NOI - 5IZE A5 NOTED CLA55 200 FVC, LATERAL LINE ------ 5CHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVING MINIMUM TYlICE!5IZE OF INTERIOR FIFE AMS Landscape Architecture 1405 Northeast Katsure Street Issaquah, Washington 98029 Volas 245-681-6458 Fax 425-837-3661 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED IDSCAPE ARC ITE T U M S I LANDSCAPE ARC ITECT ARTHU M. SEIDEL CERTIFICATE NO. 706 rja (114 0 00 441 Tj_ 1-4 5 C4 cl LL LO Ui C4 0 00 0) 4 0 E 100 LU "lop X C C) (D 6 tH I 01111111111111 !11111111111111 1'11111111 111111111111 .......... REVISION& MARK DESCRIMON DATE BY 165U. FOR MRMIT 9/12/02 AMS REVISION -1 12/16/02 AMS RFECEIVEED DEC 2 3 2002 PERMIT COUKER SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAFF. IWIGATION AND DETAILS SCALE: DRAVvN BY: 1110101-011 AMS DATE: CHECKED BY: 09/12/2002 AMS P.ROJECT NO.: FILE NAME - SHEET NO.: -2 L NTS NT5 Cm C* 0 00 *0 A I A I iz-- 1-7 �� fn _T r 11 LAT'N"DS CAPE PLAN.,-,TING PLAN 111=10' - 0" T A 1--d-FINDSCAPE NOTES: 1. SEE ARGHITF-GTURAL PRANINC-75 FOR 51TE FENCING, VIALL5, BUILDINO LAYOUT AND LOCATION, CURBIN6, 516NA6E, AND L16HTIN6. 2. SEE GIVIL PRANIN65 FOR 6RADIN6, SPOT ELEVATION, AND CONTOUR LINES. 4 V�F E3. ALL TREES TO BE A MINIMUM OF 41 FROM ANY PAVINO OR CURBING. 4. STREET TREES TO BE PLANTED OE3 NITHIN 41 OF PROPERTY LINE. TREES AND LAROE 5HRUB5 TO BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 5FROM ANY NATER/5ENER LINE AND 41 Fa:_ FROM FIRE HYDRANT5. ALL LAND50APE AREA5 NILL RECEIVE A 2" LAYER OF MEDIUM- F I NE HOOD- MULC.,H. 1. 5EE 5HEET L-4 FOR PLANT MATERIAL 56HEOULE AND DETAIL5. PLANT GUANTITIE5 SHOViN ON PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE ARE FOR CITY INFORMATION 4 NF GONTRAGTOR\R 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANT GUANTITIES A5 SHONN E3)"' SYME30L ON PRANIN6. APPRVED By PLANNI AMS Landscape Architecture 1405 Northeast Katsura Street Issaquah, Washington 98029 Voice 245-681-6468 Fax 426-8374681 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE AR9IITECT C ARTHX M. SEIDEL CERTIFICATE NO. 706 rl M_- A 11 0 0 Itr U) Ld Cm IRT 0) C? 0 00 0 E m w 0 S z so fill 11 Hill REVISIONS: MARK DESCRIMON DATE BY ISSU. FOR KRMIT 9/12102 AM$ MVISION -1 12/16/02 AMS SHEETUTLE: LANDSCAFF. FLANTINGRECEIVED 10LAN DEC 2 3 2002 PERMIT COUNTER SCALE: DRAWN BY: 1113101-011 AMS DATE: CHECKED BY. 09/12/2002 AMS PROJECT NO.: FILE NAME: SHEETNO.: L-3 .1 NOTE5-- PLANT OROUNDCOVER HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLOIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AKAY FROM ROOTBALL. 6ROUNIXWER FLANTIN& NT5 x 07 , + T X velmW04, X -A %Illlt X 5FAGII� NOTE: SPACING TO BE TRIANGLE PER DISTANCE SHONN ON PLANT SCHEDULE SPACING APPLIES TO ALL GROUNDCOVER5 AND FORMAL SHRUB ROY4 FLACEMENT. T'�PIOAL PLANT 5PACINC7 NT5 GROUNI)GOVER NO MULCH AROUND PLANT 5TEM BACKFILL PIT NITH 50% TOP501L AND 50% NATIVE SOIL. ADD SPECIFIED AMMENDMENT5 AND FERTILIZER TO MIX, 2" SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER 5FECIMED PLANT TABLET$ SCARIrY ROOTBALL ON CONTAINER MATERIAL. MULCH LAYER E06E OF BED EDGE Or FAVIN6 .CA I F11- IN&WV I UMI- DIAMETER NOTES: PLANT TREES H16H ENOUGH TO A�,OIN 0 F051TIVE DRAINAGE MAY FRO ROOTBALL. ROUGHEN ALL SURFACES OF FIT. LOCATE ALL STAKES OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALL. OECIOUQU15 TREE PLANTIN6 AND 5TAKIN6 NT5 lw .e-?% I rim- r-&wc-� I=^" DIAMETER NOTES: PLANT SHRUB HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLON POSITIVE DRAINAGE AKAY FROM ROOTBALL, ROUGHEN ALL SURFACES Or PIT, 5HRUE3 PLANTIN(7 Nit) PREVALINC, Y41NO ROOTBALL TIRME TRUNK STAKE - TYPICAL PLAN VIEN 'ME - PRUNE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 20 DIAMETER TREATED Lov&Erol E STAKE (2 TOTAL) TREE MAP ATTACH TO TREE USING 'CHAINLOCK'GUY`INr7 INRAF AND PROTECT TREE 12" DIAMETER No MULCH RIN(9 REMOVE BURLAP AND/OR INIRE BASKETS. FROM THE TOP 113 OF ROOT BALL. 2" SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER WECIFIED PLANT TABLETS 3ACKFILL FIT NITH 50% rOF5OII- AND 50% NATIVE �011-. ADD 5FECIrIEr2 WMPNOMENT5 AND �ERTILIZER TO MIX. IND15TURBED NATIVE SOIL SHRUB - PRUNE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 611 DIAK�TER NO MULCH RIN& BACKFILL PIT Y41TH 50% TOF501L AND 50% NATIVE 501L. A012 SPECIFIED AMMENOMENT5 AND FERTILIZER To Mix. 2" 5PECIFIE-12 MULCH LAYER SPECIFIED PLANT TABLETS SCARIFY ROOTBALL ON CONTAINER MATERIAL. REMOVE TOP I/B OF BURLAP ON BW MATERIAL PLANT MATERIAL 5GHEPULE SYME30L BOTANICAL- NAME / COMMON NAME 51ZE NOTES OUANTITY 16 ACER RUBRUM 'BONHALL' / BONHALL MAPLE 1-3/4" CAL. 60, MATCHED FORM 4 IO'HT. MIN. 5TREET TREE BRANCHED AT (51 9 5TENARTIA KOREANA / KOREAN5TENARTIA 6' HT. 5M FULL $ BU5HY, LON BRANCHED 5TYRAX JAPONICU5 / JAPANE5E5NONDROP TREE V HT. B$B, FULL i BU5HY, 0 LON BRANCHED SHRUE35 Do 0 BER617-NIA CRA551FOLIA / NINTER-BLOOMIN(5 BER(5ENIA I CAL. FULL $ BU5HY, 21-611 O.C. 65 0 CAMELLIA 5A5ANQUA 'CLEOFATRAI / No COMMON NAME 161-2111 HT. FULL $ SU5HY (FINK) 12 oy 0 CAMELLIA 5A5ANOUA 'YULETIDE'/ NO COMMON NAME 10"-2111 HT. FULL s BU:5HY (RED) 3 PM 0 FUCH51A MArvELLANICA / NO COMMON NAME 3 18"-21" HT. FULL4 BUSHY, 41-01, O.C. I LF 0 LEUCOTHOE FONTANE51ANA 'RAINBON' / RAINBoN DROOPINry LEUCOTI-oEI,5fl-2111 HT. FULL s BU5HY, 4'-Olf o.C. 25 No 0 NANDINA DOME5TICA lCOMPACTAl / COMPACT HEAVENLY BAMBOO 2111-2411 HT. FULL 4 SU5HY, 5'-o" o.c., .93 OB 05MANTHU5 BURKNOOoll / No COMMON NAME 21"-24" HT. FULL s BU5HY, 4'-0;: o.C. 12 .5R 5ARCOCOGGA RU5GIFOLIA / No COMMON NAME 1611-2111 HT. FULL s BU!5HY, 4'-011 o.C. 15 \10 0 VIBURNUM DAVIE)II / r?AVjr?jjl--vjBURNU . VI 2111-24" HT. FULL $ BU5HY, 4'-&' o-.��-. 24 NF 0 NE16ELA FLORIDA / NE16ELA 21"-24"HT. FULL $ BU5HY, 61-oll o.C. 16 FERRENIAL5 / 6RA55E5 HSO 0 HEMEROGALL15 STELLA 01 ORO' / 5TELLA 01 ORO DAYLILY I (5AL. PULL s BU5HY, 21-011 O.C. H5 0 H05TA 51EBOLr?IANA / PLANTAIN LILY 14 1!5 0 IR15 51BIRIGA / No COMMON NAME I 6AL. PULL $ BU5HY, 21-61, O.C. 12 1 CAL. FULL $ SU5HY, 21-011 o.o. 46 6ROUNDcovER 6AULTHERIA PROGUMBEN5 / NINTER6REEN 4" POT 24,10.0. A5 RE01v LYSIMAGHIA NUMMULARIA / MONEYNORT 411 POT 241, O.C. A5 REolv VINCA MINOR / ONARF FERINNKLE 4" POT 241, A5 REalv A M 8 Landscape Architecture 1405 Northeast Kst$ura Street Issaquah, Washington 98029 Voice 24r)-6814458 Fax 42"37-3661 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARC ITECT A4 AMSEIDEL CERTIFICATE NO, 706 r Cm LL 0 0 IV 04 IV 0 E v Ul 0% 4) m a REVISIONS: MARK DESCRimoN DATE BY ISSU- FOR FF-RlIT 9/12/02 AMS RF-VISION -1 12116102 AMS RECEIVED DEC 2 3 2002 PERMIT COUNTER 77ET TITLE: LANDSCAFF. Fl-ANTING SCHMOULF. AND OF —TAILS SCALE: DRAWN BY: I AMS DATE; CHECKED BY.- 09/12/2002 1 AMS PRO LICT NO.: 9 1 FILE NAME: SHEET NO.: L-4 I 4 i '166 fy I m ...... ...... 5 t". A i �X, 1-11M., fN VT 1PIN, ;Fl"l�V-.'!."'.,,��.",,�P.P�*,�""'��.71��.'�"��,, 4, A 9 14 iP 1A Ne Ioj ! T1, A -A 1_$l � wm?� MOW K., "i -Aft V I It V N 0, It. t%v, s w I �1� %��. r . - , k .-Now'; `V A* i Ali J;: V, Uf 4 17: �i "� rk, j;, R q if V.- I. "V;'� -jfj4- t I , , i T"I , , ;, " �% I. . __, 11". 1 _ , - 0 1 . , ,, - I , ;, , 1 - " z, ; -F `0 NZ QUtW2 k 'oEv" 5`44E. -ASE '40 k- T A . t, 1z W Y 3 111K. W3 34 , tj, ....... ...... W T 40.0'1 '1 W." 1 .1. .. QJ1 I-T "it" 4�7;11 P T z-vi .46 t U JI, AW Y, 'R 0 'X. 'k 0, N� oAqqR,%T41 g Im-y 7i t: ;0� 4. x �vi qn tko 1"- 4, ;46 "M -Ijj gi L"10 'i�'% in "t", N� !If If. .I I 'SiP R"Ut T"I"k 'Jil ji;t, zy Z_: A17_T414;144 _4'1�,:t -i W, 11.1'r" 41� -10 B 6 "qtry Air v --d wi, f." '�;,i t r, 31,4 "mw PROMOXi Q_ AT Ik �UR _4 'R. 1--T .14, _,i�;�AJ 16 tWj: TA IV 6 E E�'.,Ii,`-' OTE:�:�5 `X " H "0, J N" :oj i 1� -.1 1 1� , TF 0! �`A�, P 'r It. g mw-% IA 0_., wr - - -I- , I , . p.:- 't:, I " V A Gf. d (pil m I �, �* ` IV, �A IA H; 4 -,v' Lit ml, R, a TE 4`E,1,E:G E fr r4g 'YAW 14 , Irt a '61M iI'. ek:, W., K. j I t EX. wAtm m4W dh a9wd'vi 4.?1. 4� -, 1 , , _ 0, " 17, - ..(k I F 41 ol-, x A A: g. yv, Py v IV SEE j A, FOR UTI -ITY ACCES T. S D mom ALSO So OF SI T :,-'m SY,4,4 "v, 01 il tit Jtj LOONTR4 r OTOR to 4A. _VAWod 'L-'-' U 'T`�NAJL :TOP x 4 OA*m (70 RAUgEml. 4 -W AMM-em. * Y, 1 01. 5 10 EG 100.2 9"AWMAWMAPM, AN OM5, 102.1 00.5 0. 5 E G 9 9.20 1 Q b V A0,40 WJ FtNtE PO': 4; ViPl� -'Ioill 7. A!" 7, A ruff _14 IaW CLO*O o" AW #bNALL T 4," V�, I w - ' * _,' _ ;�` �)v 4"A. d 1WUfiEAr.W1.4MpAro#A FW. MOM 11wq - - , - - � i.1 V� i ., ..--! f LAW A i. ew mite, I L 'A A�- �.,,t7 R 11" COMM -�S .9 q% 'Jim liwr tostcmyolr, *10 It Pv T. gri MOM Mt M MWA, MW WAW? Ag !;. jr!V�W Ld F dR 'I k,3*. 5 IST fr, mr pws�x illow oven ArA#WM Now, R V -'S E CIA" A jr G E 401.1'FOR S LINE few gx.W.A(. P IN& mr&4 4, A --AP" !'f L I fE` (D IN t rppApwwvm~ 4-A ##j%At ANOW T`� 1. 1� I 07*.. ON ce, x n n rE.-SEWIT TER& ANDISIDE SEWM 9 ON Pffll A, -6 Ty '$HA U. BE W IN TA 1P. jj �.i W' '4 SEE, 12l �4F PROM 0 .-M . .11" . , , 41 '1 Q, UNIT 2 IT-3 bN 4,E A GH S N 1 2 yt�: ;if, �,,L4 P M E 'T E R Ft 0 t.3 __'_U Q X- E V Mii 1�z m T" F-17 tiv Y. ki. 4 "o"11 X A "N. 0" i 11, - REN L -1h 7; "T *1 - :J9 I; 'I,, . 11 1 1 P., vkl 'A'i N. :ON&%�i�T- H.- n X r) k . . ........ VPI I J 1 17,111 v I %.I ap. �u N . ......... . ...... k TE DW- M."Al -ENTR AW Y' -A, iT., . ............ All. Ica, At-,: V .6 3RADE SL E R- V �T . � 11 A.b,. j .'4 -f ; T .1, 0 - W1. P. V, -f,4� c 7,1. q,;" 7.. .1 E R H SE, �TIITUN_F- EL PN-", V " 7%, 0 Vl_:,� 01 4!i 'it U_ 0 0A T'O ym ;k 01 " Fr-N 4 17 ;p- 2T. Ms.; I, tf.. 04. 00 4.1i It_ U. Mii T E, R U�j I Y 4 J: T I W E ux, N I �UN t. 4 �g 20",Y Y 4.4 �Iib L U` A2 W A I: p, 4'. &6N &*,4!' A i� .3- J,. It , , , " 0,070 A . , I _. 1 .1 , - IstoO, c )" "7, - , " ,,r , I . "' ' L -t ' ' "' AI. 'Allf. I. ..... . . . . . . . r4p te .0 " f 3 f-P 99.25 A I., " .. "'i. I . ,. � -z . - �, M.15 A 7 4i N kI si L "Ai v -4- 4/ 14, 14/ 'tit I ". .. I Q ADF4" % fill I ... ............... . ............... v, "Ile + IV UNII 1 9ACK T, "I't. % A El vt IL . ."I?. :;, 't F -1, �W lo t� I , 4, v 7 V L X A w 7f z v, 0 0 j U"* q U .7/1 it, t!f b tj L) EG 9 9. 3 0 alC E(3 100.1 tt Him, 2, POOPERTY U j Z -A ........... . ............ . ..... UA W., I -Apo x1or UJ ;zK;k.. 4, 1: A-- .. ......... tni:�', T-1 07. y a"i 'I , , " I , - , , -1 1 - ��, I I H L ' r I I ] �: 4 - .. fl, ff�l 1:1. 14 , AID A Tj 0 R,'�. N D p suILD .......... . .. . ...... . ............ t 7-7 jy% ti 7' 7 V�'� III`� 17 W,I , % -1-,37 715 R + 21,75 5 ARTURM. I GNP 44A P IA 14'� -7, 60 A I .1� t., .7,:1 9 111,, Q3 .,)'j:. 1120 'T, W AL .0 'A '%W,. t).; k. , i-!, "', - �V. "q! 5.1 v 7 ti III JIK i,:- m 1, R M 21601 90M W, 0 do -.7 Z. , ;t VELOPMENU CITY -OF EDMONDS q ?�i J., AT - K." kppp P , b. �3 4� 'I . " , 1. . . . . I . . Pf k:�, AP i I. p. OVEVASWTED NG E - �E PM 0 WW98 ON& E R T!' ii%`14 Al E' HI H 1 - Z I X s 0 a 5k _T ip V "s, i, N. & b y"'��j t V': t U b ERING j 4f: U q d� 04, t 6 . ... .. slit, "Not X,. D Z4) fv,4^ Nv 4 Vt, k? V �'.:v "j? A .3 jl� ." It Al I mr, 'A 'q gj �itkl . . "R ;t 'y �S- �tg PR j P 'pig ft 1, 1IN' z ki A AX11 19 p if Ali 4 U A. No b 4". 1 I o - ; ", V u1jwz. A 4 ? A- .,i, i�.� Ii%f4 e SWIrM od&m Till -A T IA u fag w,� q�i it 4 AS STSW NE 114 OF -SECTION 30p TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EISTj WM. z Cq _3 EX. SSMH OSS STA 2+74 RIM 106.03 IE 98.05 z C6 :;z CY) 11 W GRADE FROM BLDGS TO VALLEY TO BACK OF SM AS SHOWN w 04 z 0 to C14 N 0 N tq 0 w F- LO z 00 00 _j 0 _j 00 w - 0 Ld ?1m= 1 5.70 Z w �<_ w .E.=1 0.18 < 0 0 w m w M >� w 1-1 _j < CL 0 CE3#10(IL) SEE TABLE-SHT 1/4 w JOIN 2' OF 24" PIPE STUB T -�B Z V) 0 C) �:th > 0 w Z - m Cj ON 0 F- w 1-- < 0 W C) Z 2 w Z z C) 7i fq Ld 11 10 U) L) w < Ad D =� m 1-- w _%A10 U_ �Oww D 1111i I > CB#9(11-48") Uj o < d (n af > B co 0 m �9: x z < w LO w 0 :j IL a_ :E m I_ >- W (0 0 0� to to LO _j FOR UTI-ITY �c ACCES SEE LL w W W:*C'4 0 119001 > 0 - Z Ill ALSO So. SIDE OF SIT 0 w < 5- m ad w Qf LO (0 LLJ �- F- z w ca w M 0 V) w IL < z 0 0 0) 0 0 C) U) w 10- jo 3: a- -q- - (j W 11 U) 0 LC-) ll-_ wo,- m EG 02.1 9.20 w . Z w U) . 1�105JK1.04.0 4. 102.0 1 0210 EG 101.5 EG Ln X ILD (n < Q_w 0485 EG J 'CO - S� L -0 _j 02 ET L TOP LLJ X 0 7 Z 00 0 D 0.5.3 Lqw. saililill z Ill w + (0 1 zri- L) Ir 0 POST T1w . . Ld 2. jq .. .1 L, - . 1 0 z r1i 'ED It 0 m < a- Z.A;, f p Ill, k 0 + - x I ?IM .E.=1 90 Ll EG 9.21 R A E STE C T Will MK I C 51 BA K TI LI Ty E GRAD D PER Cl Y S1D. R: li(IZ93 1 Q0 RIM=10 .97; 2 'S 0 EX. C HE RE F E > < 00 006 1_1_ 0 0- zw _j 0 of 1_ x 01w EL 105 EL 104 EL 102 EL 10% +00 m in St. 212th S . SW TE 216th St. Sj -C216th 218th S $t. SW . SW ai 2 20th S �. SW < _; < I =1222nd S S 9 00 LL w Ld 00 0 0 W w m 0 U_ ry 0 V) w 3. LLJ t,� w + w -------- to + '\ + C� w 3: w LO y 0 F /* M V., 0 F 3* 'p &- , -k t 0 U) W W (n OZ) F-1 `0,1 L6 P -4 TS ed EL 10� V) w in + + 0 alow D ---411 FVC FOR DOWNS w w Ld V) Uj + V�CfiV�TY-MAP JOIN FG ALL SIL, ES n w 0 5 ALL UNITS NOTE Ed102.0_,,'0' T COMP. DEPTH CL. B ASPHALI m 1ST wFLf 103. x 3" COMP. DEPTH ATI + w .4 PT FROM* HERE& E. SIll OF LOGS. U) 1p I - - - GAR= 9 f 6w COMP DEPTH GRAVEL BOR[l L0 W 103�C LOG 100. 00 K -EX. FENCE z 0.31% SP-OPE TO CB#8 4 14VnMu 1- 0 3N A PAINT IST FLF4=103.5 li I Z RIM -0 li Z z Z) Ltc I Il 0 m -41 Ij 0, ir UNff-I U.ISM-2 EL 10.2 ,--VALLEY 1111N�-102.9; SLOPE NORTH TO 101-11 AT CORNER I UTILITY/ACCESS ESM"T. M � _j M TO E. PROPERTY LINE 00 _j 1k * -\I.- -1 A 1_� _ __ _I 3. �O q F=103.0 G l W x ............ .......... w LO LO 0) 01 P6 4'g4' QQNQ- DIAUnmn 6 6 0 0 L iFG1_END,0'3 CENTERED ON MAIN ENT < < < < < F- F- CANOPY I V) In V) (n Ell "llill drHffiHPL(.1S 3.0' ROCKERY >w� z EL 10( ""--ICB#6 11-48") 44 . I'll 5 U) V) U) (n in (n V) (n U) (n EVSqGAM 71ME 16m WrR MAIN Ill V ELEV 99.3T & TOP 100.82 ON P 0 �Ill L1 I W WTR MAIN ID ELEV 99.11 & TOP 100.66 OVE OUTLET PI I ill 0 1 =__ I I - r 0 j DEaDUOUS 7REE, &WSWIllillill < �7. C.O. SS STA1+20 Ej� -F lt� Gl F=103.0 3.0 41 4 G17=103.0 IL j G ll 3" kPEP 0.15% 1 11)0 011 1,1 1 n PL4NNED PROPERTY CORNER ---VALLEY lNi 9- SLOPE q:)UTH TO 101.qAS SHOWN " I I ' UNff-5 -6 9 3 AMNY TAM"" SIGN & PAIN+ 1,0WCURSTO HERE w * * -1313#5(REST�ICTOR) _E t) SEE DETAIL - SHT 1/4 1ST 03.5 IS, EG S P., 'VALLEY' w m 11, 111, .41 w (Q. + ZZ I m 0' F EP16 D p FW 14, 'M l( 14e 103.0 1 "EG 102.8 EG 102.3 (IL EKIST. BUILDING 51jil #1604' 9010 A10 SSMH OF J.JSS 3TA 1+45 10 6 Ill 94.76 ROA DIS TORM DRA EG 99.30 IPE (IN BACKGRD . (7JNSURVEYED CORNER) X 2'ReFERENcEpcwrToRML1NE DOR1111111FIl 120 NEWCONTOURLINES CLE4RING LIMIT LINE NEWWATERM4WOTSERWCE DRiVEWAYPROFME EX WAMTAl OR SMWW SCALEOHORM 1ff=20'L0ff* VERT.- 1"01-0 (ALONG DRIVEWAY CEMERLINE) EX a4N. SEMM U41N OR SERWCE - 0 SF 2.2' RO KERY WALL SEE SECT. B- 2' ROTK EL 104 SOUTH BLDG NORTH BLDG z 1ST FLR=103.5 :1 - M in-Z w\- F G F=103. -7 0/61 ll F SCALE." IN= 20"l U+UU MULTIPLE I'WTR PROPOSED APT BLDG IN FOREGROUND U) z 1 r UTILITY ACCESS EASEMENT 0 0 UNIT FENCE to w z GRADE TO VALLEY Ill AS SHOWN _j EX. GRADE ON N. PR PERTY LINE 113�4 -ROCKERY ALO G N. PROP. LN < 1ST FLR=103.5 CON C. FIN GR 0 PATIO F JAIO=102.0 36" ND-12 DETENTION PIPE V UNIT PRIVACY, FENCE 1+00 iiiiiiiiiiiii-CIE1#10 (1Q 44' 36" N12 PIPE AT 07UOPE W/2' 24" DIA STUB' LD C= D LD) SEC T�O#V 29 SCALE:HORIZ: 1" = 20'; VERT: 1" 2' (ALONG CENTER OF NORTH BAdKYARD) -------- 6- SDR35 SEW R 2 O w z :J Ld 0- 0 ry z 1+00 E Ll 36" DIA DETENTION PIPE -(BACKGROUND) 8' N12 @ ill N. OF AT 3 5' S N PROP LN A . . . . N Q59,,EC Tf ON A A SCALE:HORIZ: 1" 20'; VERT: 1 2 w z imi TYPE Ill 54 D14 MH w 0- 0 w 0- SEE NOTE I RESTRICTOR ELBOW 8 Cl TO 8 0 CWP SEENOTE6 IAW-46.20 SEENOTE3 P PIPE SEC77ON RESTRICTOR PL W10i AS SPECIFIED. EX. GRADE VSE SOLID LOCKING COVER MRKED 1DRAINR & WILOCKIJYG BOLTS RIM=103.80 AT 12w VER77M TO C8 JAWRT _36wDA ill MAXWrRSIJRFAQl 100 YR.0?eW--E1J6wA T 100. 30 I " EL= 100.97 0 E 100� ;T;T 10 10 YR 1.04mAT 1W.00 MIN 2 ZRIZ0.64"AT.96.20 SHEAR G4 TE Ill CONTROL ROD FOR CLEMOUTIVRNN-BENDASREOD FOR VER77CAL ALIGNMENT WICOVER 1. USE REMO V. WA TER TIGHT COUPL ING ELBOW VER77CAL TO BE 12ffMIN. 2. USE OIVE3wXO 090w(34GEPIPESUPPORT A T 3VFJ? 77CAL SPA ClAil MAXIMUM 3. G4SRETED BAND TO ALLOWREMOVAL. 4. ALL METAL TO BE CORROSION RESISTMT CB#5 RESTRICTOR DETAIL NOT TO SCALE j ?,'I al 7j rip A - i mozzlol 1107170 1717 t7li Ill Iv I I i ol I k 0 L1177,17 -11,1 P,=77,77 o7ll 4"1 71 14A7#7 iiii ill T _74 10 7771,77777 0 -7 =,7_AU,1lIl T 70 �771:; 14.,'/ i':Z,�f "11 IA: :�V:Hffllll :Ilk 7 r "I'll =0771 I I ii $jij I I I Ili i It .9iii-vi #17- k :Iii- 71�- i k J h7w-TUM, 1,77-17,77, :7 /1 JA 77 __ _7 FIR 7 "177, # 711 J, 7 il L L MAJ Ill [vie JiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII "W� V177m.77.1mm MIL U 771 m ff w 1 Imp. WA ___ 9792 EDMONDS WAY EDA!ONDS, WA 98020 APPLICANT: A.D. i ARCHI TECTS, P.S, 6WAMINSTREET EDMbNDS, WA 0020 PHONE. 425-778-5M SURVEYOR: A.F.M. INDU97RIES, INC. 20?6, MADISON STREET 0MMMil 0 mzffj�� 01MAKON MIMI EVERE", WA 98203 PHON,E. 425,353-1 ENGWEER: DEAA.f HOUGH 4 ASSOC14 TES 891811THSTNE i EVERill WA 98205 PHONE- 42643SO262 A FOR CONSTRUCTION BY.- DATE.- 4047/0,2_ CITY OF EDMONDS EXPIRES: APPROVED FOR MAILBOX LOCATION BY.- DA TE.* THOMAS SNYVEIZ POSTMAS U S POSTAL SERVICE L Z-1 General Notes STrr"IEET FILE LQ r In z� 3. CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS 8/5/03 Z., SECON FIRST REVIEW 12/16/0 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/02 No. Revision/issue Date Sheet OMOLIA COURT 6 UNITAPTS PROJECT Date Sept 12,202 Scale 4 IN 20 FEET MIMCAMMO aM =t. IR-ADM 7117102 N14W t op,p,- EX. F. H. MSTALL 4m STORZ ADAPTE AT S S I I EX. SSMH (PSS STA 2+74 8007 21 5TH ST SW ry __J I_ RIM 106.03 IE 98.05 215THSTSW 111,,,�,_ @ N 75 z 011 ry 4 TELEPHONE PVC CONDUIT TO APT BUILDINGS SEE NOTE 5 w___2�- TO EACH ELEC. METER SET LJJ 0-1 U) 17- 240/120V 1 PHASE FROM PP > n b, __J (C 00 T-4 ry A x 04.85 EG 105.1 - - - - /SET NAIL TOP 00 L @ REMO)M GAt MAIN Cf) CD LO x I MWI 4.26 INUM vpv x FOR UTI-ITY ACCES::; SEE F ',';ITM Al SO S , SI � Q J J 1 d 00.5 .3/101.25 1 0015 102. 12L.5Z100.5 160. IS(9033457 EG 100.2 00 - + 41 41 14, 14/ %4/ 1.1/ 4- -4/ 141 41 41 -3 INJ ALL NDUI1_ - 9.6 4, t5i "" 1. - 11 R 141, EE NOTE 3, E 0 N, 1ST F LI lk,3.5 JCE; 11 :-T�A P PWR CHE 40 FOR SFRV/ LINE SE M HH PROP�Ll E AP E X;_---s ca PROP LI E L.,,, C 0 N D. -41 ELELUNIT-1 UNIT-2 �NIT-3 . METERS FORI BLDG-EACH ISIDE SEE NJTE1 2 I G F=103.0 Z J N I I IT I r-, A AS MAIN BIY OMHE ms E TRENCH UNIT-5 IT-6 Do LEGEND. C= EMSE WIRUMY, WHIGHPLUS EVERGREEN TREE DECIDUOUS TREF, S2E7SwMV(=V PLMNED PROPERTY CORNER (UNSU, ED CORNER) IRVEY X_ 2'REFERENCE POINT 7*0 RM LINE DOMWOUr NEW COWOUR LINES CLEMNG LimirLINE NEWWATMAMWORSERVICE' AEwa4N BEWERMARV OR SERVICE EX WATER AWN OR aERNCE` WC SM. SEWER MAfiV OR SERVICE 9. !E!r A(EMSMAFM?fiVTMWSMMISAfR7ENWAAVSWiMOFFBYAYVPEOM DS"H EG 9.20 BURNAM AS SWIM & PW 07U IhISTALL SERtlW UNE FROU AWN THIRIJ COAIDUff TO aW 4 CAPPHO OF COADUff SIMLL BE PER PW STAMARDS SM MEETAI 1 F17R HUMMIM aEVAn0N8&WfERLCrAWM 2. PO IM UIW SFIALL W IMMLLED FROM POLE TO MM*CW OPPROX MIXOMMESO) ME11TOMETERSSMONEACHBUILOM. F0lbERLaWS1(1ALLfiE8IAA04RDRE3I1DENTlAL LOW LESS GAS FOR HEA7WG SPACE & WATER LOAD SMALL BEATLE48TFOR MCROWAVES, LU CLOThES DRYEMAND OVENFOR EACH UM hVSTALL49CONDUffFROMM.DG7VPOLEPER P UD 8 PEG FrA nON& &SXSIDESEMMSHAUBEATSSSTAD#40#MO#MOWAA01+17AND81 LLBE'r 0. 5' OFFO-PVCUAEAT2%&OPE7VLraSANWM(ASIY07EDABOMAAVATSSSTA TEE' 1+20,*WrPMMCCOOUrSfDEAWASSIOMSUSE4wPVCUPSIRE4M. WELOCUM LAMPME COVeW - FAM WOE 4 CMMSEIVEIRUhIDERIANTERONUMMEW111 CEMNAE02 %SLOPE TO drLAMPHOLEAS SWWWAWJQWTOM41MMMMWMVWASSW*WATINVERTM8*4. &M"IfOAECO=UffSWLBE4'PWSCHE40MRWLfiYLcAAfD2ffCOAVWrTOPOLF- A frXfrPEDESTAL&li4LLREWTAUMATJUAL7=SWMV VER2W MLIAINTALL CABLE ELSORCOAMMAREMMLLEDIMMMMAM 0WWffh1IAYfiEfiV -EX FENCE 0A10E`PLVM=PAN SAW 7WXH AS aW OR POKER MOVAIM A Ir CLEAR SEIWA 77ON fillf TAENCK REWE EX WM. FOR IMMIATION FURPOSM PUrBACM0WPAEVEN7ER MW OF T1w I WA TER MW. NOTE: SEWER LA TER4L AND SIDE SEWERS ON FRIVA TE PROPERTY SWLL BE MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS. z W.WALL UNIT4 . ....................... :T . .......................... . ........ ....... . .............................. ........ . . 99E 34 EG 1-d UNIT5 YARD UNIT 4 YARD . .................. .................. . .......... EX. GRADE E.L 2.8 ,000� E.I., 2.0 EL 1.5 . . .... 1--H] 11 AR Fl..R 4V \1,1 N qW 1 INST4,LL C,, 14/ EG 99. 0 F- LOW , 1 q, I FMO %4/ M 0 J. 30.00 x x �EG �03. 1 02.8/101.25 102.3/100.5 101.7/100.5- EG 100.1 102 ING IFF OM N. S. PROPERTY LIN C', ADD 4' ADAPTER S PWR POLE A� 70' S/SITE TO EX. FIRE HYDRANT EXIST. BU§LD§NG SSMH CO)SS 101.56 1 E ea %-Z. 00 STA 1+45 9 4.7 6 P0, 90, # 16041 sup 0� copo S CA L E: 10 '- 0, EI.. 0.4_00 J T W E T EG 99.30 CONC, PATIO +77.75 W L PR S"'Al E: I 1101`�!:Z: 1" 20'; VER 1-: 1 2 z b (I EX. GRAM EL 1.7 1+17.75 LE A.A.,.J EL 1.5 GAR FLIR, ........... ....................................................... ....... . . . . ........ ... ........ .. . . EL (). 5 ........... .................................... .................. . .... ................................................................................................... ....................... .................................................... .............. ............... -�l ..2 +27,75 +37.75 +77.75, 17.7 1+26.25 V-015 ; . `-'F- WALL P[ IR OF I L E Nr I I W SCALE: HORIZ: 1 20'; VERT- 1 2' General Notes 3. CONSTRUCTION REVISONS 8/5/03 SFQ�ONQ RUIEW, 1/28/0 1. FIRST REVIEW 4AZY4� ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/02 No. Revision/Issue Date A '01.11. Project Name and Address MAGNOLIA APAWMENTS 21501 BOTHAVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 MOLIA COURT Sheet 6 UNITAPTS PROJECT Date Sept 12,202 Scale I IN 10 FEET IMM C=1R_WWMW 7117MMW294 MW EXPIRES. C f ITY OF EDMONDS U) @ ,/CB "RIM= 1 5.70 Z 11.E.=1 0.18 < :2 z tr Ld k V* 10 � "I T A NE 114 OF SECTION 30 TO WNSHIP 2 7 NOR TH, RA NGE 4 EA S T, W M. 0 a- z 0 FILL FROM BLDGS TO BACK OF S/W TO LEVEL SHOWN P 0) U4 z 0 :) Lo q- 00 Ld C� 00c) U�j 1� 00 0) : Cd 0 0)- -j 0 Ld 11 Ld LJ -j - ui < Lj C.) It 0 < zpi- 0 `� Lii Cr "I": Z) \ W > -0 V) Z < cr Iz M � ' N - 60 B CB#9 -104.80 0 0 IE-- .40 1 I ?,�P�, k so I PZ I 0 FOR UTILITY & ACCESS 1, EG 105.1 104.3 101.25 s 104.2/100l15, 102.1/100.5 101.5/1 0.5 EE EG 9.20 ALSO SO. SIDE OF SITE Z SET NAIL TOP MINCE POST 150.00' ISBQJ33y r-VK- - -�; X G 100.2 F- OK I .41 �a :g I � o 0 0 + 0 I E StN & PAINT 0. 5' EL 10 V 14B 0 ERE E 9. % 2" COMP. DEPTH CL. B ASPHA 3" COMP. DEPTH A 4. * 11 1ST FL 2.0 W/Sl z k1LB )X lZUSTER',iffCATE 1'. 6 COMP DEPTH GRAVEL BORRO AT LK AS SHC D NALK EX. FENCE 5'1 BACK. g� IE=98.40 TILITY C,E. T. UNIT-1 41 CB#8(IL) R 101.35-\ `C UN1T-2 UNIT-3 0 M EL I O , V) 1 '11 F' UTILITYMCCESS ESIl CB#7, --1 1074 TO E. END OF DWY Of M ::li 5140 F='01.5 R L) X E xm =101. F=101.5 Ld APRON PER C I A -A' r'n1110- I W REVER E GR E DIAMOND rT BI I PROM E 'TE-RE-E) -0N-tfAtN-E!q4;� C < P6 C14 P7 P5 UANOPY �G '7 4 )/ 2 - /111 1, .............. -1. i:�l` . . . . .... . ......................... 5' ROCKERY >,i z. EL 10( Lo V40 'g 11'� 4� ( I F=101.5 CB#6(l L =101.20 4Z- G1 F= 101.5 IL 101.5 -4 !E=98.40 -4 UNIT UNIT-5 NIT-6 + TYP AL 03. NYT E" SIGN & PAI *N) Mk hT '�E=9 29 L INV V) 30 IACVV CL S + - I I ! L C13#41[11-54") R=FG=103 SEE DETAIL EX. B#2 RIM=10 7j RESTRICTOR CB: IE 1ST Fl-W102.0 IE=' A2(N, E .40 9 7 l JOI w2 'TO EX. H R ,_N 5. EL 106 EL 104 EL 102 EL 1 00C 24" ND- 8" P�, SECIION& & SCALE: HORIZ: 1 20'; VERT: 1 2' (ALONG CENTER OF BACKYARDS) FL W 1 1 l I N.J 41 1 % L`d- 41, 7= 151700, G 103.0 102.8/101.25 102.3/100.5 101. T/-100.5'� EG 100.1 j02 S I ling Area 2:1 SLOPE MAXIMUM From . S.propertyline EXIST. BUILDING 11(IL) CBRIM=103.81E=39.00 HALT RAIL E N. END C D KCB TOP SHOWS SOLID COVER PU FOR BY-PASS OFFDN DRAINAGE ONLY 901 1601-t 01 sup\\j O� ORD .PL A R' OA DIS "7llllllll`U" R M L)" RA / N N SCALE: I to 20�-Olr 1 -41 CIA- -G - /I ��z 99.25 > EG 99.30 EL 104 -j EL 103 >- F- af LLj EL 102 0 EL 101 0 V) EL 100 0+01 GRADE AT BLDG TO 13E 100.5 ALL AROUND EXCEPT IN FRONT 8"PVC SEWER @5'N. OF P/L W/4" PVC TEES (UNIT I SEWER IN BACKGROUND MULTIPLI(�TR SERVICES---J :jjz - 2: 0 , LL C.4 d < Uj CN t L) N -C 11 LLIJ Mm (n -1d LLJ 11 M 0 En 0) Z 0�:D 11 W �- 0 (3 z V) Lo (n 0 Uj R:: -j w 0 > E3 W 0 c) X V) 0 LL- It - unj 1 0o6 X Uj 0 M . 't < - V) LO U- 0 F-: 0) Ld Er . EL (00 't to - D 0 . 0 0 X z [L IL - �Lj z 7- X >� W y 0 [L 0 LLj LO 11 W wo- 0 :2 < �i N z to LT 0 00 tk I.-- + 0 z M �5- M �4 03 M < q + 1, + L) (0 >- In - 11� T- B- Q It + 4- � -64 - f v + N 0 1ST FLR=102.01ALL UNITS GAR=101.1 -77 77-� .2 5, RIM ffiv I I I 'non", I / 0 tl b I jtb A d[YE-IF11 1 7 /+ 9 1 9 L 0) L52 �,j, 4m, "EFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION; CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY 16" VV I M MAIN UtFl h A I ti I URM URAIN CROSSING; TOP=97.12 V PR OFIL E DO` R VE WA it SCALE. HORIZ, I 20l VERT: 1`10�-O" (A L ONG DRI VE WA Y CEN TERL INE) CONC. WALL SEE WALL PROFILES, SHT 3 LU z F- W 0 D- It o- Ld 0 00 + in St. I 3:: 212th S1. SW < ITE F'S 216th St. SV7- 4 216th !;t. 218th S SW . SW 220th St. SW < < _C 1222nd S Sf ;4! -001", 001 ITYMAP V/G IN 2000' LfUEND: L 00bo EXIST SHRUBBRY, 6'HIGH PLUS EVERGREEN TREE (1. 0 j DECIDUOUS TREE SIZE SHO WN(DIA) PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER (UNSURVEYED CORNER) 2"REFERENCE POINT TO RIW LINE 0 DOWNSPOUT NEW CONTOUR LINES CL EA RING L IA41 T L INE NEW WA TER MAIN OR SERVICE NEW SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE EX W4 TER MA IN OR SER VICE EX. SAN SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE TOP ELEV OF WALLABASE ELEVOF WALL CBMANHOLEWITHsoLID COVER lilt", z >- F- NORTH BLDG ry 1. Sidewalks shall be per City of Edmonds standa d drawings LLI a- 0 and surfacin sha# also be per City of Edmonds standards. 11� n 2. Curb and gutters sha# be as specified in the City of Edmonds,,51andards or APWA, current edfion. access driveway paving shafl be according to the paving se,.-�',On shown in the profile hereon. z 4. Mailbox clustershall be on 80th Av Was shown & installed accoldi'l to USPS standards and andlor coordinated with the local postmaster. PAVE PER FIRQF�ILE �LqOV4 1+00 wfrontagepaving along 80th Av shafl drain 'to 10' tho south end of frontage. CONC. ENCAS EA. PIPE 'AT 6" MIN. ALL OUND 6. Power and telephone conduits shall be installed unde' frolN the existing pole' (see sht 3) to the -24" DIA D TE�TION PIPES AT a a 1. ent buildings as shown. 6'-2" SEP AFION; CTR TO CTR locations are approximate and the contractor shag explore 'and locate existing lines to make sure of location, depth and afignl. 11PVC S 'S. OF P/L W/4" TEES The City and Engineer are not responsible for said locations shom hereon. MULTIPL SERV ICES 8. The driveway cut In the sidewalk sha# slope 2% into the site as s117own on the prorile. A 9. The contractor sha# be responsible to obtain afl necessary permh's and notify the City 24 hours in advance of any construction.. 10. Traffic control shag b6per traffic plan & coordinated with the City of Edmonds Traffic .)UALE:HUR1Z: 1" 20'; VE R T: 1 2) Engineer pnor to beginning the work in 80th A v W 11. A# foundation drains sha# connect into CB#1 I as shown which is at the southwest comer of site. Tie a#downspouts to the detention pipe as shown and use 4"P11Cpioe. 12.Fill level from the back of sidewalk to the retalnin wall -building ' 9 wag as shown in the prol s shown. 13. Minimum slope for side sewers is 2% on all side sewer 14. Miniumum cover over the I " water service lines is 24 on both selv ce trenches sho wn OWNER: SOUTHI3LQ.G- 1ST FLR=102.0 --]G F=101. TYPE 54 DIA MH SEE NO TE I RE5TRICTORELBOW PIP E SUPPORT SEE NOTE 2 12 CPEP TO 12"CMP SEE NOTE 5 V=98.1 MIN 2 OJ?IF=O. 71"A T 96.40 SHEAR GATE W1 CONTROL ROD FOR CLEANOUNDR41N - BEIVD AS REQ`D :z: FOR VER TICA L A L IGNIVEN T WICO VER T SEE NOTE 3 j 1 PIPE 1. USEREMOV WATERTIGHTCOUPLING 'T'ON�.l RES" TRIC TOR PL W10 ELBOW VERTICAL TO BE 12- MIN. AS SPECIFIED. 2 USE ONE XWO.09011 GAGE PIPE SUPPORT A T XVER TICAL SPACING MAxIMUM 3. GASKETED BAND TO ALLOW REMOVAL. 4. ALL METAL TO BE CORROSIONRESISTANT 6 JOIN PIPES WISAND STRAP WFFH GASKET CB#4 RES TRIC TOR DE TA IL NOT TO SCALE USE SOLID LOCKING COVER MARKED "DRAIl W1 LOCKING BOLTS alM=103.80 POLYPROPYLENE HANDHOLDS A T 12 " VER FICA L TO CS IN VER T -94 " DIA OMP I C MAX WTR S EL= 100.25 OOYRO =1.39"AT99.80 IOYRO IF=1 15"AT99 60 R. CHARLIE NA THAN I NALUND CONSTRUCTION Co. 9792 EDY', ONDS WAY EDMOND WA 98020 APPLICANT: A.D.S. ARCHITECTS, P.S. 600 MAIN S TREE T EDMOND-3', WA 98020 PHONE. 4,25-778-5400 SURVEYOR: . . A;F M. 1ATILISTRIES INC. 262'6 MAL,�ISON STREET EVERETT WA 98203 PHONE.'-�,?5-353-8950 -ENGINEER: DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES 8918 11THSTNE EVERETT; WA 98205 PHONE. 425 -3,15-0262 CB# TYPFE-10CATION --RIM &2�WVV,-G-O-VER 4 - 11-54" -F-'0+37.5, 0+37.5, 39.0'RT 103.8 Y6.40 RD SOLID 5 1-46- ON CTR I 02.72 98.40 _ SOLID 6 IL 1+67.5, ON CTR 10 1.20 98.40 _RD GRATE, S 7 -LI_-48' 0+37.5, 6.2'LT 102.74 98.40 RD SOLID 1+76.0.6.2'LT 101.45 , o -CM ID 1.481? �0+375,42't -W4-K.98.40 10 L 10+16.0,47'RT 98.29 _gp_SOLID GRA TE 0+32.5,48'RT �-103,80 19ROO 11 --SQSOLID PIPE INFORMA T1 PIPE# L6AtG_TH TYPE SLOPE CB# -REMARKS P2 35' 10CPEP 0.47% CB#10 P3 20' -7-� -Y5 12"dP-EP 0.47% CB#4 R TRICTOR P4 24"Ni2 Tq-.1ZB-#5 P5 127' 240 N12 0% CB#6 P6 24 - N 12 0 % P7 135, 2,F- Ni2 o % CB#8 P8 CB#9 P9 15' 13.81 % I CB#11 FOR FQN DRAIN L APPR FOR CONSTRUCTION B DA TE. rj-7 Cily OF EDMONDS General Notes 12. ISECOND REVIEW 1/28/0 12/16/0 1. FIRST REVIEW ISSUE FOR PERMIT /12/02 N a. Revision/Issue Date rF'.,m Name and Address DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES 8918 11THSTNE EVERETT, WA 98205-1407 PHONE 425-335-0262 rP11ject `7 �OldAddess MA GNOL A A PA R TMEN R 2150180 TH A VE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 ...... . Sheet OekoLIA COURT 6 UNITAPTS PROJECT Date Sept12,2002 Scale 1 IN 20 FEET P3.'98;i C2201_1R2.DWG 71171o2ra,1128,,03 re-% I- "' UJ NE 114 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH RANGE 4 EAST, WM 00 SUR ve� P, CCORD EXISS7. BUILDING #16041901BI ESCIGRADING PLAN SCALE. 111=20�-O" FENCE A. ESC Minimum Requirements. All activities necessitating a clearing or grading permit and all utility projects consisting of more than 500 lineal feet of trench excavation shall be required to control erosion sediment during construction and to permanently stabilize exposed soil resulting from construction. Projects involving a critical area may also be required to comply with any combination of the ESC minimum requirements. Compliance will be demonstrated through the Implementation of an approved ESC plan. Guidelines for preparing ESC plans are provided in the manual. The plan must address the following requirements: 1. ESC minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practical, limited to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or crushed rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads shall be cleaned throroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment Is removed in this manner. 2. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of exposed areas. All'soils e)posed by land disturbing activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMPs, Including, but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching All BMPs shall be selected, designed and maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two days from October I through April 30 and no more than seven days from May 1 through September 30). 3. ESC Minimum REquirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or mulching, or by a combination of these measures and other appropriate BMPs. 4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be reqularly inspected and maintained by the owner to ensure continued performance of their Intended function. All maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual. 5' ROCKERY 5. ESC Minimum Requirement - Other BMPs. As required by the city, other appropriate BMPs to mitigate the effects of increased runoff shall be applied. 6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Underground Utility Construction. The construction of underground utility lines shall specifically address the following: a. erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be placed on the uphill side of trenches; c. Trench dewatering'systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable means); d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance. 7.Additional ESC Minimum Requirements for Larger Developments. All new development and redevelopment that includes land disturbing activities of greater than, or equal to, one acre in addition to meeting the minimum requirements set forth above shall comply with ESC requirements listed below: 8. ESC Minimum Requirement - Delineate clearing and easement limits. In the field, mark clearing limits and/or any easements, setbacks, sensitive/critical area and the buffers, tree and drainage courses. 9. ESC Minimum Requirement - Sediment Trapping. Prior to leaving the site, storm water runoff shall pass through a sediment pond or sediment trap, or other appropriate BMPs. Seclimen . t ponds and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers, and other BMPs intended to trap sediment on -site shall be constructed as a first step in grading. These BMPs shall be functional before land disturbing activities take place. Earthen structures, such as dams, dikes, and diversions shall be seeded and mulched according to an approved timetable. 10. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and fill slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will minimize erosion. In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC Requirement No. 2. 11. ESC Minumurn Requirement - Controlling Off -site Erosion. Pruperties and water ways downstream from development sites shall be protected from erosion due to increase in the volume, velocity, and peak flow rate of storm water runoff from the project site. 12. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Temporary Conveyance Channels and Outlets. All temporary on -site conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed and stabilized to prevent erosion from the expected velocity of flow from a two-year, 24-hour frequency storm for the developed condition. Stabilization adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes and downstream reaches shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems. 13. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storm Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable during construction shall be protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment. 14. ESC Minimum Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilized. 15. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Dewatering Construction Sites. Dewatering systems shall discharge into a sediment trap or sediment pond. 16. Erosion and sediment Control Requirement - Control of Pollutants other than Sediment on Construction sites. All pollutants other than sediment that occur on site during construction shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of storm water. 17. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Financial Liability. Performance bonding, or other appropriate financial instruments, shall be required for all projects to ensure compliance with the aporoved erosion and sediment control plan. -LEGEND: 0000 EXIST SHRUBBRY, 6'HIGH PLUS EVERGREEN TREE PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER (UNSURVEYED CORNER) X_ 2'REFERENCE POINT TO RM LINE NEW CONTOUR LINES / SIL T FENCE L INE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. This construction sequence to to be used as a guideline. Conditions may require changes In the timing of work. Changes shall be discussed with and approved by the City Inspector and owner. 4 Talli 9 1 a: 11 id till,11111 1111,18 a sp -0220, ext. 1328) 24 !;�1�1111347tor. Call' the Enginewaiiii irill I otion line (425-771 hours In advance to schedule Inspe Tons and to not up a preconstruction _T as cc an 3. -Frdg _rT0t-_0_f-_Wcy lnsfi� PrOiiifY iin-68 On -cle ng ImIts Indi tod the plan. 4. Install ollt fences and construction entrance per plan. All TESC Items are to b: chocked daily during the winter construction season. Any stockpiles are to b covered If left for more then 2 days and rain to expected. All alto disturbance Is to stop during rain and all TESC Items are to be chocked and monitored. Any Items allowing elt laden water to pass shall be repalrod Immediately. 5. Clear & grub to clearing limits, In this case the whole site. 6. Rough grade access driveway. 7. Install storm drainage. detention pipe. water quality features and other utilities. 8. Complete road construction. 9. Hydroseed disturbed land surfaces. Ecomat MOY be necessary for slopes 3:1 and greater during the winter construction Mason. 10. Clean storm drainage system and place Into operation. 11. Remove remaining T.E.S.C. structures after site has-been stabilized and approved by the City Inspector. T.E.S.C. PLAN NOTES ALL SITE DISCHARGE MUST MEET WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE CHAPTER 7-53 SOO (5 NTU MAX). IF ANY SILT LADEN WATER IS DBsERVED AT ANY. TIME, PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY FOR REVISED OR ADD17IONAL MEASURES. GRADING NOTES 1. EST'. QUANTITY OF CUT: 845 CU. YDS. 2. EST. QUANTITY OF EXCAV. & EMBANKMENTS: 856 CY 3. EST. QUANTITY OF SURPLUS TO EXPORT: 834 CY 4. PROPOSED D Z AND SHALL OUTSIDE OF EDMONDS CITY LIMITS. L'M" 3 Ur _Y� 0 r 5. EST. QUANTI O�FIMP N�� "V'5.0 6. TOTAL AREA EARED: 15,000 S F APPRQVF,D FOR CONSTRUCTION BY. I IAZ� DA TE. 2- 0 �// 2L3 CITY OF E-D-MONDS General Notes 11-)t1,UNU l1tVlt.W 1/28/0 IFIRST REVIEW 12/16/0 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/02 No. I Revision/Issue Date I Firm Name and Address DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIATES 8918 11THSTNE EVERETT, WA 98205-1407 PHONE 425-335-o262 Project Name and Address MA GNOL A A PA R TMEN TZ, 3 2150180 TH A VE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 Vo� -- f164MOLIA COURT Sheet 6 UNITAPTS PROJECT Date 2 S pt 12 - e 20.02 Scale 4 1 IN = 20 FEET k - ___J! h6- P398 C220t_2ESDWG 7117102re. 1128103 EXPIRES. 4/5/25671 NE 114 OF SEC TION 30, TO WNSHIP 2 7 AIOR TH, RANGE 4 EA S Ty W M Lr� 000% LuEND: I / I 1� \ " < I ) ry -1 4 TELEPHONE PVC CONDUIT TO APT BUILDINGS TO EACH ELEC. METER SET Ld ry 240/120V 1 PHASE FROM PP U) > SSMH#3'RIM=1=104.,3 IE-97.83(OUT)Q) n AT PROF. STA 0+32.5; 45'LT. co ry 00 x X1 UTILITYNOTES: III I. CONTRACTOR TOINSTALL20t-3"SCHE40 WHITE PVC WITH ELBOW FROM PROPERTYLINE TO EG 1 104.3/1 1.25 LO . �21 0 101.V100.5 BUILDINGS AS SHOWN & PSE WILL INSTALL SERVICE LINE FROM MAIN THRU CONDUIT TO GAS �i _ EG 100.2 T LL..15 ::L_ / 4 - METER SETS AFTER INTERNAL SYSTEM IS AIR TESTED AND SIGNED OFF BY INSPECTOR. DEPTH TO -.105.35 -�J 150. 101 1/1 r --- I I 104.85 05 102.1/ 00.5 EG 99.20 T- FENQE POST IS89 3345"E x __/SET VIL TOP 00 &CAPPING OF CONDUIT SHALL BE PER PSE STANDARDS. SEE SHEETA3.1 FOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS& METERLOCATIONS. 2. POWER LINE SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM POLE TO HANDHOLE (APPROX. 56 X 6 X42 DEEP) C) Cl) AND TO METERS SETS ON EACH BUILDING. POWER LOAD SHALL BE STANDARD RESIDENTIAL @ REMOVE D&C 0.5 LOAD LESS GAS FOR HEA TING SPACE & WA TER. LOAD SHALL BEA T LEAST FOR MICROWA VES, 1 Z6 P VQQ S� F� PI" % SLOP� CLOTHES DRYERS AND OVEN FOR EACH UNIT. INSTALL 4" CONDUIT FROM BLDG TO POLE PER w - PUD SPECIFICA TIONS. F1 <I, GA' MAIN INS1/41-1- L 5 2 3. SS SIDE SEWER S TA TIONING FOR EA CH L INES'HA L L BE 0+40 A ND 0 +80 - EA CH L INE AND 0- SHALL BE 4"'TEE OFF 8"PVC LINE& PLACE CLE4NOUT OUTSIDE BLDG AS SHOWN. USE 9. LOCKING LAMPHOLE COVERS - EACH SIDE SEWER - 4 EA. S STA; SEE Nf)TE 31 4. CROSS SEWER OVER WATER AT5'NIS. PROP. LINE EKTEND IN 8"DI, PIPE, CLASS 52 @1% cf) V I q/ SLOPE, I- 20'JOINT WITH JOINTA T2'FROM MH#2. EE DTE I 1ST FUR=162.0 5. TELEPHONE CONDUIT SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHE 40 TO PJW LINEAND 21, CONDUIT TO POLE. A < "I � - ) \1/ 12"X12"PEDESTAL SHALL BE INSTALLEDATJUNCTION SHOWN. VERIZONWILL INSTALL CABLE A CD 'J)WfVNiT��SCHE 40 FOR SLRV/LINE SEE--N=-I- ONCE PLYWOOD PANELS OR CONDUITSARE INSTALLED INSIDE BUILDINGS. CONDUITMAYBEIN PWR d PROP LINE EX. FENCE SAME TRENCHAS GAS OR POWER PROVIDED A 12"CLEAR SEPARA TION IN TRENCH. HH A P E X. SWR 6. REUSE EY. WAM. F-Q8 IRRIGA TION PURPOSES; PUT BACKFLOWPREVENTER WEST OF THE LO F I -Qv D W D P E T NOTE: SEWER LATERALSAND MANHOLES ONPRIVATEPROPERTy UNIT-1 I I UN1T-2 I 11UNIT-3 SHALL BEMAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS. x 3 ELH-C. METERS FO BLDG-EACHI SIDE - SEE NOTF� 2 BE I'' PROFIH cn--L'� .......... IK AS MAI B Y 0 H S" 03. FC� 1� 03. T S STA +20; J. I N., IM -03. 6 � IE-- ASP SE 2 2'- D 'C ECHANN I\IE PER S- PWR POLE Al 7 pal 0!5 \I/ M M I N 0 EXIST SHRUBBR Y, 6'HIGH PLUS EVERGREEN TREE DECIDUOUS TREE, SIZE SHOWN(DIA) PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER (UNSURVEYED CORNER) SEENOTE5 2'REFERENCE POINT TO RIW LINE DOWNSPOUT b NEW CONTOUR LINES I CLEARING LIMITLINE NEW WA TER MAIN OR SERVICE \B Vap SSMHB4 R1 -inn IF=.QR r--,F\(nHT)i NEW SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE AT PROF. �Y\A 1+62; 51T. EX WATER MAIN OR SERVICE Ov EX. SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE - 5?\A FOR UTI-ITY & ACCES SEE N LSO So. SID'E OF SITJ I F- [ . . ...... I I/ G -101.5_ F- 101. 5 G F-101.5 z 0 0- EW SERVICES 11 DIA IN E CH - IF, z W.WALL UNIT4 re CANOPY 0 91--tc NEW 1 SERVICE I ON'- TRENCH r EL 1. G F=101.5 11 IS F-101.5 -T- < L IL -101.5 UNIT 5 YARD UNIT 4 YARD EX - GRADE EL 2.8 J1- UNIT-4 UNIT-5 I IUNIT-6 1 +05 EL 1.7 EL 05 +77.75 1+17.75 NV \1/ LLL4.MLlLN bLI I \11 "I", SOUTHWEST WALL PROFILE GASI METER SET 1 2 SCALE:HORIZ: 1" = 20'; VERT: 1 =.2) SSMH#2 RIM=103.8 IE=97.30(OUT) I (", 1,1 )�- I I " .1 1 IST FLR�102.0 at SS STA 0+32.5;1 44'RT. EQ 99.25 EL 4.9 12\Q'-E�'PV(; SFWERPIP\E 9)g. 5 S L,0, P E N 0 0 S89 '45"E I- 15C.001 �CG 103.0 102.8/101.25 102.3/100.5 101.7/100.5 EG 1M1 ---a-STNGIN ARE 02 EG 99.30 F OMN.TDS.PROPERTYLIN QQhAI---1 r7, QIKA i ni r-- I ADT 4 STORZ ADAPTER TO EX. FIRE, HYDRANT AIN 21 UT): 97.08(IN) SEE N TE 4 F."A\E6.1 ON SHT 2/ SM S STA 14-45 101.46 IE 9 4. 7 6 P�3?\AN' S/SITE EXIST. BUILDING I 016041901BI 0p\0 0� \cc AT PROF. STA 1+62; 45' T. JOIN 4 1$ SIDE SEWERS WIT 8"X4" TEES V Q A TILI SCALE. I of= W-0" EL 1.5 z 0 W. WALL UNIT 1 EL 5.29 z /-EX. GRADE Q UNIT 1 BACKYARD - EL 4.3 UNIT 2 BACKYARD EL 4.2 Z-) 0 R \R FLR L H 1111 lill Jill I III L 2. G, +27.75 +37.75 +77.75 4 0+00 +05 EL 1.5 EL 0.5 1+26.25 NORTHWEST WALL PROFILE SCALE:HORIZ: 1" = 20'; VERT: I" = 2' APPR VED FOR CONS TRUC TION BY- DA TE. /Z lw��- rp WIRES: 4/5/2ou I Cn Y OF EDMONDS General Notes 2. ISECOND REVIEW 1/28/03 1. FIRST REVIEW 12/16/0 IISSUE FOR PERMIT /12/02 No. I Revision/Issue Date Firm Name and Address DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES 8918 11THSTNE EVERETT, WA 98205-1407 PHONE 425-335-0262 Project Name and Address MA GNOL 1A A PA R TMEN T,')' 2150180 TH A VE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 117MOLIA COURT Sheet 6 UNITAPTS PROJECT Date Sept 12, 2002 Scale 4 1 IN = 10 FEET P3.'96 C2201P,-3W.DWG 7117102 RE0214,11128103 I SSMH RIM=106.03 LE.=98..05 NE 114 OF SEC TION 30, TO WNSHIP 2 7 NOR TH, RA NGE 4 EA S T; W M. General Notes C8 RIM=105.70 LE.=100.18 CB RIM=102.97 I.E.=98.12 30' SSMH 0+00 RIM=101.87 I.E.=94.61 LL-- EXIST. BUILDING boo 90 0� 150.00' S89*38'30"E cr) BENCHMARK TOP MON ELEV= 100.00 ASSUMED 180.00, S89-3830"E (BASIS OF BEARING) \_FND. 2" BRASS DOME WI'5co IN CONC, 216 th 5t. 5. W (CASED) I 0.51 EK. CHAINLINK FENCE CONS m17w1v_m?6UCT1ON NOTES 1. All workmanship gpd-iVatefials shall be in accordance with City of Edmonds standards and thQ2CJO2 dition of the State of Washington Standard Specifications'for ridge and Municipal Construction(WSDOTIAPWA). 2. Temporary erosionlWaterpollution measures she# be required in accordance with the Erosion--& Control Notes shown on sheet 214. 3. Comply with cApther permits and other requirements by the City of 4.KCall be t�ity-oYE�kho'nds-En4ine6yrinb"l'ns-oeclYon rine (425--771-0220, ext 1326) to a pre -construction meeting and Call 24 hours in advance for inspections alignment by A F M Industries Inc or an engineering or surveying firm capable ofperforming such work. 6. Storm drain p,,;oe shflmeet the following requirements: A. Plain concrete pipe conforming to the requiremnis of AASHTO M 86, Class 2. B. Reinforced concrete pipe conforming to the requirements fo AASHTO M- 170. C. PVC pipe conforming to ASTM D 3034 SDR 35 orASTM F 789 withJbints and gaskets conforming to ASTV D 3212 and AASTM F 477. D. Ductile Iron pipe conforming to the requirements of A INWA C 15 E. Polyethylene smooth wafl pipe per Advance Drainage Systems constructeAper WSDOTIAPWA Standard Specifications 7-04. 7 Deleted 8. Provide traffic'Wh't-r6p15n(-s-Jas ii-e—quiie-d- in —accordance with MUTCD. 9. Ce# underground locate line 1-800-424-5555 minimum 48 hours prior to any excavations. 10. Where connections require "field verifications", connection points will be exposed by Contractor and rittings verified 48 hours prior to distrIbuting shut -down notices. LEGEND: 0000 EXIST SHRUBBR Y, 6'HIGH PLUS EVERGREEN TREE DECIDUOUS TREE, SIZE SHOWNI'DIA) PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER (UNSURVEYED CORNER) X_ 2'REFERENCE POINT TO RIW LINE 0 DOWNSPOUT NEW CONTOUR LINES I CLEARING LIMIT LINE NEW WATER MAIN OR SERVICE NE IN SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE EX WATER MAIN OR SERVICE EX. SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE BA 515 OF BEA RIN6 (9 Y PL 5): R.O.S. A.F. #7604190181 LE&END: + EXISTING MONUMENTAS SHOWN SET RE-BARICAP STAMPED LS 30442 El WHITE LINE STAKE (C) CALCULATED DATA (D) DEED DATA (M) MEASURED DATA (P) PLAT DATA EQUIPMENT& PROCEDUPE: LEICA TC1010 TOTAL. STATION FOR FIELD TRAVERSE PRECISION MEETS OR EXCEEDS STANDARD SET BY W.A. C. 332-130-090. LEOAL DESCRIPTTON: THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE NORTH 410 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE WEST30 FEET FOR COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS 80TH AVE. W. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 0 0 0 0 IN FEET I inch = 000 ft. (VISITED 0410412002) -9111— AW% 0 1 / 5 --- L.AN EXISTING IMPROVEMEN SCALE. 111=20�-Orl FND. 2"BRASS DOME WI"x" IN CONC. \(CASED) —(VISITED 0410412002) 0 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION �11 BY,__ie416C= DA TE at 2,10 -3 OTI) V nb-1 b_1nA11_nATnQ I EVIRES: 4/5/2004 11 1. FIRST REVIEW 2/1 "/ ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/0�2 No. Revision/Issue I Date I Firm Name and Address DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES 8918 11THSTNE EVERETT, WA 98205-1407 PHONE 425-335-0262 Project Name and Address MA GNOL 1A A PA R TMEN TS 2150180TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 C0MOLIA COURT Sheet 6 UNITAPTS PROJECT Ar 5'46 0 6 UNITA� Date 4 Sept 12,2002 % Scale I IN = 20 FEET J4 h�_ P3:98 C2201 4EX DWG 7117102 Re: 112M3