21503 80TH AVE W.PDF111111111111
7184
21503 80TH AVE W
ADDRESS:
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: c!q '-7 z�W
ILUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
CRITICAL AREAS: f4;a, —j y
DETERMINATION: F] Conditional Waiver Study Required
/XWaiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'
DRAINAGE PLAN DA
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED
PERMITS (OTHER):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER A§ BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
SOILS REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: 014
LATEMP\DST's\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc
RE TURN' ADDRESS:
Clity of Edmonds, City Clerk
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
_ZJV -e 2oo 3o 7"2s-000
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIA7E COVENANT
MULTI -FAMILY RE, SIDENTIAL
Reference#:
Grantor(s): (2) Additional on po
Gr2nlee(s): Gry of Edmonds
Legal Description (2bbrevi2ted): Sec :30 Twn Z-1 Rng
Eowr otr t,,3C_
OR Lot Block Plat
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 271- 04&0--0bj_o�,,-j_oiD (2
--Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned
NNIHEREA S, IR
are the owners of the, following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit:
Property Address: c:F�r7w
Legal Description:
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # (s):
AUTBORIZED FOR RECORDING
City of Edmonds
B3,:W—= Date 31-51 C5
P2ge --J—,Of
WHEREAS, the above named Owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive
Covenant upon said premises in compli2nec With Section 19-00.040 of tile Edmonds
Community Development Code. NVITNESSETH. that for and in
consideration Of tile premises, the above named owners do herebv declare and graint to
tile City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant,
Thai at the time of the execution Of this Covenant tile Grantors have agreed to the
Ordin2nce of file City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing
may be erected on subject property cont.2ining more than units.
Said Covenant shall be bindino upon 211 Present and future owners of said real estate and
their,heirs, successors and assigns.
DATED this
day of
, 2002—
GRA-N'TOR
State Of NA12shinglon
el
)ss
Count-y of:!�1064a.-L"-)H
I certi )]at I know or have satisf2ctory evidence that
��' I � - -- -- -
(is/are) the person(s)
who appeared before me, and said pers.on(s) 2cknowledged that (he/she/they) signed this
instrument, on oath st2led that (be/sbe/lbey a/are) 2uthorized to ex � b
and acknowledged it as tile J" ) .. ecule the instrument
- J�-i :E (title) of
0AL11104 -Y714 X-Air to be file free and . volunury act of such party(ies)
for the uses and purposes mentions in ibis instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before
me this 1-7 L-L— d2)? Of
20.(
Notary Public in and for The Simt4f
NA'2sbington.
S",
rj ;�t T'
, I(C., 11,
AlYcollimission expires
01 1
J.
AUTBORIZED FOR RECORDING
City of Edmonds
loll 0.0 IVA B3':Z=D2te- sl 31 o-3
P2ge--z— of -3
L:\TEAIP�BUILDING\FORI%ISMESTR)CT
Exhibit "A!'
.0
ei�al Desc otion
THE'SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE NORTH 410 FEET OF THE WES ' T 100 FEET OF THE SOUTH
ONE-HALF OF THE W ' EST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 30 , TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M.;
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET FOR COUNTRY ROAD KNOWN AS OOTH AVE- WEST;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, COUNTY OFSNOHOMISH, STATE,0F WASPINGTON.
(PARCEL ID " 27-0430-001-Oro7-00)
F
CEF��, / A
et3-cl Q m - U(I—` - � ` C-)
ONINNVId AG WOW&
YQ
5 -------- 77i------
g gill 11
gill
41
.4, 11111
-
A&
1111
I I I fill
d
11111if
T=
i
m
0
zc
r) nj 03
_q
rn
0
Z
.0
6n
k-0
01
too
STREET
98
0
RECEIVED
FIL JAN 2 4 2003
PERMIT COUNTER
11 ; i > i I r
:7j "III Magnolia Court Townhomes
2150180th A— W. 11,6", WA %026
NIP] 0 architects ps
wo Main Stmet, Suite C Edw--a WA 98020-3079 425.778,5400 FAX 778.3=
DA ZoneG N.E. 1'/4� -SEC. 30 T27N, RA E.W.M. -156
%c 216r+ 21002
PL. 21007 �4001 Oft 211 tokme 0 09
00 03 2101� .5 21 — — 04 Ise ;W � F1009
Ck flat *is 21012 61c 4% 2101sr 1108
of FL ZUJO06 vo 16
1UUJ 15 210 16 ku V021
2" 21018 16 21pto 21OLS 2to3S W16 2(0 11 27 211 110
S 210 13 21031
$WE E11110 21103 1114
to 21104
17 Deli
I
.cz & 2A 2J11 Me 120 SEVEN
2110521110 to) ZI 103 1160 110
- t --21118 2JI17 17
It 81palwoo"
"OD
ELI
.1112
do 2 12 21fu
11114.
lea to 1 -
120 21114. eII26
21130 fit,
00
Sw
219"' T. ITT"
21207 c 4
0
2121f. P-
VTO WN
OS42 UIRE
Z1223 V0303
N lt,,KMIM .0
ST
7630
421
%, tit 4 t- %A A MV�
21313 "CA I�a !! faq
gr3ot It 40
CY to to 00
21229 OD 15 ST. W.
o' CT 40 ;4z);
.01405
A VIOP
co qc 1314 *Alf% GYIA
.3TAJ-BAfI3 ;F� to 21SI
c. A vRcm too a ST
5.w
C4
00 % 2j 4 04 2MOZ 21393 VILLA
214 'm 214ow. DOMMA
comas
2009
2J417 . t- I I I ! i 1 4%
IMP-
00
21,q29
g
W t
00 OD
am FD so)
Sol ZIF07
0 00
TR
dk S W.
g1w mats 216 IS' 1 91616
1607
2J6,15 ?j6)4 g. 21612
2161 615 2012
460 1 1 . .
21616 c8polva
4 IV
0623 7::--- LSA 0
2 236 21 9 1 11001
2179) CHASE 21624 21 AOL
LF410E - 21704 217071 1 e 705 1701 2rrOt
SC1400L 2174
Z11708 713'
21711
2171Z 710
Z1719, L1711
7! 21720 4
0725 1 'k. 2171
?J72S* 2 727
CA
i2PQ I It I
ZIP"*
Ob to 2180
V3, 17
IT
16
91897 21812 V823 132414919 $21 14 4 lulls V819. its 21622
8030 1 gjft4 82 ?JWA
2/835 is"
21831 9191
91903 a4 [-,a I M905
04 21 219 IN ST.
1000 y
V911 %0 a r'I 21913
915219, la , ;! Aigm, 21916
6 907 tn �91
7 i�
i�m t -� 0 9
21927 Ik
94 PJ 27
220" ST S. ST 2(
14 -Ing
irrz. ! � . I ,
ku >
o,4 I is
025' 20/7
02 OD 06 018
9023 22015
031 -t
no 023
zoo OD 902S 202
026 9 02
2103 032 2 'e6 2ZO.
E-;
z
0
z
DATE: I I — H - 0 PL- PLAN CHK#- o a - L4 L4 Tj
NAME OF BUILDING PERMITAPPLICANT:-2p LQ=4ep.& -11, In
'+ A�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:--N SAA 5 Ant D-Y-'\. SL
ADB FILE #: A4:-->6 -0.'A - I �� �;)Olk DATE WAIVED:
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN:
SUBDIVISION:
LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?:
REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X1 I) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE
Plan Review By:
Sr
I ct-;L�
L-CA--N— cl"'V�
CA
L-4
f-A C>
f
Ck- - oo,-x- uy-,O+
Uri
C�i
k,Q 1A1* AplandatNewCo7,�
5�
1�--o Lco
0
ko
J�t
z
0
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects
SITEADDRESS: '8072� A,,jz ZONING: 12-�-� a - L4
USE(S)PROPOSED:-�-��-)L.;-l-EEi2��to�-,�LLOWED?:
LEGAL NONQ2!!ORMING LAND USE DETEKMINATION ISSUED (Yffl)
CUP -File: To Allow What Uses?: "<
ADB FILE #: 0-" -
PARKING:
cl
use:
No. Spaces Required:
. X LO
(floor area, # employees, etc.) 1,9-
Use:. .
No. Spaces Required:
X
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use:
'No. Spaces Required:
X
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use:
No..Spaces Required:
X
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
Total Required-
Actual Provided:
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: LeftSide: to' RightSide: 10 Rear: f 1-15"
Actual Setbacks:
Front: I LeftSIde: 10 RightSide: 10 Rear:
Street map checked for additional setback required? /No)
V -
C0,4
.V�.
MAXIMUM FLOOR -AREA:
Maximum Allowed: L4 '5 f�lo Actual:
CV U L4 L-1 LA �9-0-
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: ag> —Actual, Height:
+u,,. -,Modulation Height:
Modulation Allowed?:
Datum Polntz!�a,,,_ Datum Elpvation: JCT& C?
Elevator Penthouse > Veet over height limit? Nlil, If so,VAR#
'LANDSCAPING:
Matches ADB approved: A IL 9
Bid Provided? Ptc> B&Yd Amount (100% bid):
CRITICAL AREAS #: cbk- CA- ILI a
SEPA DETERMINATION: �-tQ k-3S P I Lo - 0
SHORELINE REQUIRED?: N_'n
C2
Continued ...
1A1ibmry\^P1andatNewConun.doc
Othr
29-0,th— 20
0
'2
R 0
LN
n
Z 00 C 7
Z
7— 203rd
_,b "RM 15
uale
m
Spraguo co —
Z Z OD
10
EdmoTqo
P.06ttJ'
Bell
y. .........
208th
PC iyt6,
MainSt
t
j j --- - - -m �-J-
aple
P
P
10th
BN RM-1.5 --------- L— Ald
Walnut
'2
77� 'j, h
M-2.4 Cn jRMj3 M-2.4—
U) Eal
Cw OS S
3 . . . . . . . .
(n
OC b'2—
P
R
p
UZ.
ZS
p RS-6 LRM
ne— 216th
RM I
21 _Z1 8th
U) R
12 �S
N
M -3 0' 220th CG2
R '8 220T 111,33 220th
S-
U)
Cb
P
Q
JL
224t
I Rm, 5
�2 4;
tj - ��BC
26t In
5
IRS: 2
-2 8t
�BP
R
BN
f 230
231 st tgM-2
232 m �5
CG
S
Vt�
RM- 5
ia
239th 6Rm-
4 30NI I RS-8
IRS-8 PI
e
P38,' H
, "A
Rp '24
ro
2
th 0 240th
IRS
VVW2 410
RMI' RM-2,4j?�
1: . _ - , , , . , 1 .1 _', Revision Date:
Vb CG — loo 1 (0 1 �4, !� %: ;!.: �: ,,, �;,
242nd —4' 7/98
RM, 15
Z
Z208th
hT
12 :h
4r —'RM-1 Last Change:
Misc. Rezones
BN 't"
;�44th 244th
T
0
0
F-A
(2— crv--, +
C,
C>
4-0
C7
t;D
0 0. 00
ck Ll%- i - I (%
2- 1 C2 0 1") , 9 �� 1 -5, \ q /T:, 1)
0 —a, c
LA LI 0
lot's
L-A--X (-A VA-��
L
cp 1�,- -
A27
ED4, 0
—.7 0
0
cl
I mg- , lhm[;� CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220
RCW 197-11-970 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: Construction of a new multi -family development at 21501 80" Ave. W. The
development will consist of two two-story buildings containing six townhomes with an approximate building
footprint of 3,375 square feet. There will also be approximately 12 off-street parking spaces provided.
Grading for construction will consist of approximately 850 cubic yards.
Proponent: George Hanna for Charlie Nathan
Location of proposal, including street address if any:;'21501 80t'Ave. W.
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and
mitigation measures have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive
plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as
provided by RCW 43.21 C.240 and WAC 197-11-158.
An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made
after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14
days from the date below. -Comments must be submitted by February 6. 2003.
Responsible Official: -Star Campbell
PositionrTitle: Assistant Planner - Plan n ing,Division
Phone: 425-771-0220
Ad -dress: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Date: Z.;;i- q 9 Signature:
XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue
North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than February 6. 2003, by filing a written appeal citing
the reasons.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the
procedures for SEPA appeals.
XX Posted on January 23, 2003, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services
Building, and the Edmonds Post Office.
XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the
Checklist.
Page I of 2
SEPA DETERIVIMATIONMAGNOLIA. DOC
1/23/03.SEPA
Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist:
XX Environmental Review Section XX
Applicant:
George Hanna for
Department of Ecology
A.D. Shapiro Architects
P.O. Box 47703
600 Main St., Suite C
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Edmonds, WA 98020
XX AT&T Broadband XX
Property Owner:
Charlie Nathan
Outside P�ant Engineer, North Region
20811 84' Ave. S., Suite 101
9792 Edmonds Way, #266
Kent, WA 98032
Edmonds, WA 98020
XX Edmonds School District No. 15
Aftn.: Bret Carlstad,
Planningand Property Manager
20420 68th Avenue West
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400
XX MITIGATING MEASURE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL:
1. THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT $800 IN TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEES, BASED ON AN
ESTIMATED 4 EVENING PEAK HOUR TRIPS AT $200 / TRIP.
Attachments
pc: File No. PC-02-444
SEPA Notebook
Attachments
Page.2.of 2
SEPA DETERMINATIONMAGNOLIA. DOC
1/23/03.SEPA
0 .0
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapir . o Architects, PS
6/24/2002
PuKpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the city identify impacts from
your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and, to
,help the city decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. City of Edmonds will use this checklist to determine whether the environmental
impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the
questions briefly, with the most precise information know, or give the best description
you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge.
In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or
project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if
a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply".
Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the city
can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them
over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information
that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The city may ask you
to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to
determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
A. Background
Name of proposed project, if applicable: Magnolia Court Town Homes
2. Name of applicant: A.D. Shapiro Architects
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
600 Main Street, suite C
Edmonds, WA 98020
(425) 778-5400 Attn: Tony Shapiro
4. Date checklist prepared: June 24, 2002
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds
z
2002
S 0 T P!
D M; u-% i �)"s L
ENVIANMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House
01h Proj No: 12325-00
215018 Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
'5/24/2002
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction is slated to begin with grading in fall 2002
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
This will be a new building. No further addition expected afterfinishing construction.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
There are no wetlands on this site. A geotechnical reportfor our site will be
prepared The information will be available then.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals.of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
NIA
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known.
City of Edmonds as well as other possible agencies will need to review this project.
City of Edmonds permits include but are not limited to: Site Development Plan
Approval, Storm Drainage review, Civil Construction Permit, Building Permit,
Landscape. "�" r2-C'4A I = 4F C-r C-j'2-r-4 L-
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that
ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those
answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional
specific information on project description.)
This project will consist of two new buildings with a total area of 6,750 SF (footprint
area = 3,375 SF Ea.) to be usedfor Housing (2 stories of Town Homes). This will be
constructed of woodfirame, with a building height of approximately 25'-0 " to
M-O" using 4:12 sloped roofs (or grater) and will meet all applicable codes.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The site is located one lot to the north of the intersection of 216' St. SW & 80" Ave.
W.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002
Legal description:
The South 100feet of the North 410feet of the West 180feet of the South one-half of the
West one-half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of section 30, Townshi - p
27 North, Range 4 East, W. M.;
EXCEPT the West 30feetfor country road known as 8e Ave. West;
Situate in the City of Edmonds, County of Snohomish, State of Washington.
(PARCEL ID # 27-0430-001-067-00)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other:
The Site isflat with one house on the site which will be demolished
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The Site isflat.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
The soils report isforth coming
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If
so, describe.
None that we are aware of.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Cut & Fill will less than 850 CY
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Erosion will be controlled with appropriate construction practices per the Temporary
Erosion Control Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL
0
CHECKLIST - SEPA
MagnoHa Court Town House
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026
Proj No: 12325-00
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? I
Area
Area S.F.
Overall Site Area
15,000+/-
Total footprint
5,200
2 nd Floor
6,750
Impervious Surface Area
10,000
Landscaped Area
5,000
Lot Coverage
45%
Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
An erosion control plan prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the state Of
Washington will be preparedfor development of this site. The erosion control plan
will contain at a minimum; construction sequences, location of clearing limits,
location and construction details forfilterfabric fence, location and construction
features of a rock construction entrance and rock staging area.
2. Air t
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project
is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if know.
Minor air pollution from construction activities may occur. In addition, there will be
emissionsfirom the automobile tra
ffic of the finished project. It is not expected that
there will be any other types of air pollution involved.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?. If
so, generally describe. I
We do notfeel that there are any off site sources ofpollution that will be problematic
to our project.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
The building's equipment willfully comply with EPA emission requirements and we
will plant the site to provide a natural emission filter.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year-round and seasonal streams, lakes, ponds,
wetland)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,
state what stream or river it flows into.
None.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
4
0 0
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the
site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
The proposal does not involve any planned discharges of waste materials to
surface waters.
b. Ground
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
Soils report pending ground water not anticipated.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are, expected to serve.
This proposal does not involve the discharge of waste material into the ground
from septic tanks or other sources. It will connect with the City Sanitary Sewer
main.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where
will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
The proposed project will generate stormwater runofffrom impervious roof and
pavement surfaces. The project will use City of Edmonds regional detention
systernfor both detention andfiltration.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface water? If so, generally
describe.
Waste materialsfrom accidental spills or discharges will be handled by city
filtration system. Refer to the previous answer.
0 , 0
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any:
All impervious pavement surfaces will be collected and conveyed through an
underground wet vault.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation 4 L4
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altere VrE5GE
; 1 4q 4 th ; f; h 4 ;11 1, 4
at [16 "n 1-up r&6 "ruur& r- r-A a r&5 U"ac "It trur-3 ry V I G UVC 1-a"r-4 C> I 1--k P)AC;T- /��p2f& -
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to be on this site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or o ther measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on
the site, if any:
A complete landscape plan showing plant types is provided as -a part of this submission.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or
near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, sonjzbirds, other: None
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Small animals such as squirrels and raccoons are
assumed to be on or near the site.
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None to our knowledge
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
To our knowledge, this is not in a migratory route.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
New landscaping will help to reduce impact to the wildlife.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
6
ENVIRO*NMENTAL CHECKLIST - #PA
Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002
Electric power will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs, mainly for lighting and
running equipment. Natural gas will be usedfor heating.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No, The maximum height of the building on the site is 30'-0 er City of EdmoAds Code.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this Proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any.
The building will be designed to comply with the Washington State Energy Code.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
There are no known hazardous conditions related to this proposal.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
The completed proposal would not need any emergency services beyond standard Police, Medical
and Fire department services.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None are included in this proposal.
b. Noise I
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may effect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
None
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
The only anticipated noise pollution would be standard construction noise and automobile
traffic that would be related to thefinished project.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None at this time.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? i
The site currently has a singlefamily residence, and is surrounded by a high school and medical
office buildings.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No.
c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing rental house.
d. Will any structure be demolished? If so, what? Existing structures will be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM 2.4 Multi Family
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026
Proj N,,,): 12325-00
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Existing zoning is in compliance with
the Comp Plan XC
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply
h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive' area? If so, specify? None
i Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
There may be perhaps as many as 12 residents in the finished project.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed job displace?
Site has a house, therefore the house renter displacement would occur.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
We have conformed to the entire setback, landscape, building height and parking requirements that
relate to this zone.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing.
Six housing units will be provided. Middle income housing.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing.
One.
c. Proposed m ' easures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Does not apply-
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal
exterior building material(s) proposed?
The building will be constructed o wood siding, Landscaping will be at the street buffer and at the
!f
setbacks.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
none
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Sensitive architectural design.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
This lighting has not yet been designed, but will be done so in a way that limits off.,site light spill.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House Proj No: 12325-00
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002,
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No, there will not be enough light to cause problems to the surrounding area.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None are known that would be problematic.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Lights that are set close to adjacent properties will be fitted with glare shields in order to reduce
impact to others.
12. Recreation
a. What designated,and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
High School football and baseball fields are adjacent to the property.
c. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to
be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.,
Nothing of historical significance on or adjacent to site.
b. Generally describe if any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Access to our site will be the streetfrontage. There is a major access road north of our site, (212h
S W).
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
There is a Community Transit bus stops on 212"' SW to the north.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project
eliminate?
Twelve C)
9 1�5- Q-ne�
ENVIRtMENTAL CHECKLIST - SEPA
Magnolia Court Town House Prcj No: 12325-00
21501 801h Ave. W., Edmonds, WA 98026 A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
6/24/2002
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to existing roacls or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
Streetfirontage improvements in front of the property.
e.
9
Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
There will be no use of water, rail or air transportation by this project —
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate
when peak volumes would occur.
Only those associated with six town homes
Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None at this time.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: 'fire protection, police
i
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
Police and Fire Protection will be impacted due to the fact that the site currently has (not in
business) workshop & a house and we will be adding a six unit building and people that will need
standard protection.
Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
None.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural -as, Cable TV, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. (All are available).
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
The completed project will nee&
Power service that will be provided through Snohomish County PUD.
Water service will be from the City of Edmonds.
Gasfirom Puget Sound Energy.
Phone, data and cable will befirom the standard providers in the bowl.
Garbage service will be provided by Sound Disposal.
C. Signature
The above answers are true a?d comple
Edmonds is relying 4 t4er� tb, mak� its
Signature
Date Submitted
to -the best of my knowledge. I understand that the,City of
0,
10
REC '177VED
f
CITY OF EDMONDS J U .3 2
SEPA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALySIgEVa0P1vjL.-�-; �_RVICE I S
SE
WORK SHEET
Name of Proposed -Project:
OwneriApplicant:
Name
9 49 2- 67Dmotmc
zn
Street/Mailing Address
/40/k J_0Q vvA
city State zip
Telephone- A 2-,r5- 24 1 - :7 24 0
Applicant Contact Person:
44-/\N"19
Name
Street/Mailing Address
��OAJD -or, kmA 99ew_0
city State zip
Telephone: -17-5- -7-79-5-400
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis:
ft,
Firm Name
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Contact Name
Telephone
a. Street address (if knolm): AVE. W., "XDM0yU0S" wA fj&oZA
b. Location:t4r�i e,-,-zT-1 -7 -c- L!ac6ml) 0626 1,nT 70- rw-- Noe__-W. E7W--
OF �Zj(,
(Auach a vicinity map and sileplan.)
c. Specif� existing land use:
T=A tj "cAisr-
d. Specify proposed type and size of development: -,� 1' :;ppo Towo fJpA4r__e -rc,,f
2, -F A -75D SE.
AL_ Artra-A rF-xD-r, aL2.1�M
e. When will the project begin construction and when will it be c;ompleted? :::�-PrW_-T mk) VA L.L_ 240,-)2
f Define proposed access locations: il XF_ OM/kIr 1,c;,TQr;2,7r_
g. Define propowA sight distance atsite egress locations: Po\pi �aloly Ts-,
P.we I
00
2. TRIP GENTRATION
Ole
a. Existijig Site Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour Trips
IN OUT
41
b. Ploposed Project Trip Generation Table: —
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PMPeak-Hour Trips
IN OUT
-A
. �60
-1
. 2-
t--r-:� - r-A.
(PA50-Y2
T8- L ki Y;L- -2-:3 C)
-T
- c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Beak -Hour Trips
IN OUT
V&T A.I&,
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted orpassby trips: mme-- �,-Dzl -UM,-MA)
Page 2
3.\TRIP DISTMUTION
\Pirepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages . and assipments.
4. SIT14CCESS ROADWAYIDRIVCWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have �i
,gbt distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements?
b. lutersection Level of Service Analysis:
e Existing CoMitions
LOS Delays
0 Year of Opening'-\\ \
LOS Delays
* Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use
LOS Delays
(Intersections to be evaluated �hall be determined by the City ofFdmonds Traffic Engineer.)
c. Describechannelization w'arrant�,,\
Attach stripiRg plan-)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (
e Existing Conditions
Year of Opening -
Five Years Beyond
Change of Land Use
e. If appropriate, state stop -sign and signal warrants:
f Signmari local accident history..
U % queuing lengths):
95 ID/.
]?-Ve 3
0 W;
0 *
5'. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
N& Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, on street adjacent to and
\directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe ihe estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is
fully open (NXith and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimat") T and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the
project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. state annual background traffic groVth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Summarize Level of SeMce Analysis below and at
the following documentation for each arterial street
hour trips. Other City -planned developments must
Existing Condition:
Year of Opening LOS:
With Project:
Without Project:
i supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide
arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak-
�,be factored into the LOS calculations.
Page 4
( 0
\Five Years A
Nvlt� Project:
Without
PC
Note any assumpti
ine LOS:
to standard analysis default values and justifications:
7. NUTIGATION IZPCOMAMNDATIONS
State rezommended measures and fees required to nu '. ate project specific traffic impacts.
Jr �Mj
8. mINDWUM NUTIGATION REQUMEMENTS
Residential developments that generate ten PM peak --hour trips or less will be required to pay a $200 per PM
peak -hour trip fee.
PM Peak -Hour Trips x S 7.00 $
D.%My In Ar, - XTnn"PA-W-k,&C PW5
110lia Court Townhomes DASHED LINES INDICATE LINDER
ORCLIND TANK I DRAIN SYSTEM
21501 Wtb Am
F. Ed.�&WA 9W216 ALL ON SITE IMPERVIOUS AREAS
DRAIN To DETENTION PIPE ANY
SITE IMPROVEMENT CS. 'S
ID
WOOD FENCE t I
5ETWEEN U41TS TYP
L--,F-,T BACK 1*.6' ILBI-ly SET BACK..
a
m
>
T6 ;__6 —,
39'-&'
L 391-61 1
L 1 39'-6'
I
I JIL
.4
4 :1,
I wi
L
C.57.
A
----------------- ...... f ...................
UNIT-1 UNIT-3
'vl----- — -----
T
X
L- - - - - - - - - - - ----
----- ........ .... . ...
"T—
UN11,4 UNIT.� I UNIT-6
NEW r-------------------------------
---------------------------------
1p
_j
------
EX. SITE P�AN 00"ArN
I's2O' ;6
SITE INFORMATION
ZONE:
RM 2.4 Max. WE*44T 30'
LOT COYFRAGE
4596
TOTAL SITE AMA,
ISOM SF. 034435 AC
(b UNITS W1 2 PAWWs STALLS ENCLOSED )
WILDING FOOTPRINT,
6.750 GF..
PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE
451
Ist FLOOR AFEA
2r-d FLOOR AREA
6,328 SF.
6.790 SF.
PROVIDED LANDSCAPE
50M SF.
-TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA
100W SF�,
M34project-0325 Magwils Cc%rt-"d-Sct%mg*,W-3MSL'OCAU-�0A
a'
NOTES:
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LWT
(EI) 2 PER tHIT
LURALINE WL302W, INCANDESCENT WOW, WITW MEN" LIGWT
-PPILL.
VICINITY MAP:
NTS
Un
n at.
n SL
212th St.
9A
I ITE
TF
216th St
2160h, S..
SW
2t8th 5t:
-W
SW
220th 61.
-SW
KN
0
No: DKAl%fN BY: JUB NAM&'
325 PIV architects ps Magt
DATE: CHECKED BY: poha Court
M/24/02 ADS '00 Maln Sir"t, Sults C SHEET No.
REVISION/F0 No.: PR Nw. Edmondo, WA 96020-3079
tMECT 425.r?B.IWOO FAX T78=2
_w A141
0
11
12/17/2002 15:33 25385808�,G E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 02
E&L Civd Engineering
17 Dee 2002
Mr. George Hanna
A.D. Shapiro Architects PS
600 Main Street Suite C
Edmonds, WA 98020
Subject: INVFSnGATION OF SOIL CONDMONS AT MAGNOLIA COURT
TOWNHOWS, 21501 8UI'H AVE W, EDMONDS, WA.
I performed a site investigation on 16 Dec 2002. The site investigation involved a
review of the surrounding area, excavation of three test pits, and review of known
occurrences of sod related earthquake damage in the area. The proposed use for the
site is the construction of two, two story residential buildings with the associated
parking, utilities, landscaping and other appurtenances.
The site is located on the plateau east of the steep hill system along the Puget Sound.
The site currently is developed with a one story house and a shed with a gravel
driveway. The existing structures are around 50 years old and in poor repair. The
existing house is supported on a CMU perimeter strip foundation.
The back half of the property has several large douglas, fir trees. The tree roots are
extensive in the upper 2 feet of the soil. The site also has some grass, bushes and
shrubs.
An inspection of the existing structure and surrounding improvements did not identify
any signs of soil stability related problems. The e7dsting foundation bears at 8" below
the ground surface on a footing consisting of an unreinforced grout bed around V
thick and r wide. There is no signs of movement or soil instability in the foundation
and no visible cracking at any location. There were no visible soil stability problems in
the adjacent streets or structures.
A review of documented earthquake damage in this area did not reveal arty cases on
sites situated on the soil strata like that near the surface of this site. .
Test holes were excavated to mess the soil type and conditions, refer to the attached
site plan for locations of test holes. USGS OFR 93-233 Geological Map of Surficial
Deposits in the Seattle 3Vx6V Quadrangle maps the soils as Vashon Till (Qvt). This is
consistent with the soil observed in the test holes. This is a very dense soil with low
permeability and a very high bearing strength when undisturbed because of the high
overburden pressure during the glacial period. Based on published deep borings in this
Page 7
4,508 PW* Lane 253-858-0855
Gig Harbor, WA- 98332
12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856
. 1 0
E L CIVIL ENG
0)
PAGE 03
23501 80th SW, Ed?nonds, WA, soils Evaluation
area the Vashon till soil overlies gravelly sands that are very dense and strong. This
extends to hard nuirine sedimentary rock at a depth of 50 to 200 feet below the surface.
The upper weathered layer of the soil is often loose because of the action of plant roots,
worms and other biological factors.
The site profile observed in the test pits.
HOLE 1
0-8" Silty loarn, dark, low cohesion, (MR) numerous small shallow roots, loose.
8"-15" Silty loam, brownish red, low cohesion (MF), small roots, loose, wet
15"-31" Sandy, gravelly, silt WH-SM.), reddish yellow medium dense, wet
31"'-58" Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SM), reddish yellow very dense, very
hard, saturated, stones up to 10" diameter.
Liquefaction potential - none,
Settlement/ consolidation potential - very low
Soil has moderate static beanng strength - greater than 2000 psf allowable.
HOLE 2
O-1V Silty loam dark low cohesion, (MM numerous shallow roots, loose.
IV'-19" Silty loam brownish red, low cohesion (MP), small roots, loose, dry
lr-3r Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SM), fight tam medium dense, dry
39"-70" Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SM), light tan very dense, very
hard, dry, stones up to 10" diameter.
Liquefaction potential - none,
Settlement/ consolidation potential - very low
Soil has moderate static bearing strength - greater than 2000 psf allowable.
HOLE 3
O-V Silty loam, dark low cohesion, (MH) numerous shallow roots, loose, wet
4"-16" Silty lowx�, brownish red, low cohesion (NW), small roots, loose, wet
16"-25" Sandy, gravelly, silt (MH-SbQ, light tan, medium dense, moist
25"-60" Sandy, gravelly, silt WH-SM), light tan very dense, very
hard, dry, stones up to 10" diameter.
Liquefaction potential - none,
Settlement/ consolidation potential - very low
Soil has moderate static bearing strength - greater than 2000 psf allowable.
The site soils have little cohesion and little to no day content. The sand content is fine to
very fine sands. Appearance of the soil in the holes indicates a probable high perched
seasonal water level of approximately 30" below surface. The holes were excavated
17 Dec 2002 Page 2
12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856
E L CIVIL ENG
9)
PAGE 04
21501 80th SW, EdmOnds, WA, Soils Evaluation
during the first extended rainfall of the winter. The perched groundwater table appears
to be greatest towards the west and migrates east. The large douglas fir trees on the
site contribute to the drying of the sod on the eastern half of the lot resulting in the dry
soil condition observed in this area. After these trees are removed the perched
groundwater will become more significant in this area.
The soil strata appear to be consistent over the entire site except for the moisture
content. The site slopes to the east with appro)dmately four feet of fall.
UQUEFACTION
There is no liquefaction potential at this site. The soil density, grain size and condition
are not conducive of liquefaction. Liquefaction does not need to be considered in
designing the proposed structure and parking lot pavements.
CHARACTERIZATION OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD
There are no soil related conditions at this site that would pose an increased risk in an
earthquake. No special recommendations or actions are required for earthquakes.
RECOMMENDED BEARING STRESSES AND SEISMIC LOADING
For wood ' framed shear wall construction the seismic base shear for a structure at this
site is-
V=3.00a/R = 0.1%W for LRFD, divide by 1.4 for ASD. where:
Ca 0.36 for Zone 3 profile SD
W weight of building
R = 5.5 for light framed bearing walls vAth plywood shear panels
If other construction type is used the value of R shall be adjusted accordingly.
Recommended allowable soil bearing strength for a maximum long term settlement of
under 1" and maximum differential settlement of 1/2":
2000 pounds per square foot for bearing at 1.5, to 3' below ground surface
3000 psf for bearing below 3'. Foofts shall be on undisturbed soils below the root
zone.
Lateral bearing strength, 0.3 x weight
Passive soil resistance: 450 psf/ ft for depths over 1.5' below ground surface.
Active earth pressure for retaining wall-,
30 psf for granular fill,
35 psf for native fills.
At rest earth pressure 50 psf - usefor tied back walls.
Earth pressure for restrained walls 40 psf - use for basement walls.
17 Dec 2002 Page 3
12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856
E L CIVIL ENG
W
PAGE 05
21501 80th SW, Edntonds, WA, Soils Etntuation
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS:
The following recommendations are being provided to accommodate the proposed
construction on the lot. It is the opinion of the engineer that this is the most cost
effective and efficient method to provide a We foundation. Constructing the
foundation in this fashion will protect the structure from soil settlement.
1. The foundation should be a shAllow type system utilizing strip footings and pier
pads. Any foundation element should bear a minimum of Y-6" below the existing
ground surface on firm ttndWmbed soil. There is no special design or construction
features warranted for the foundation construction.
2. Disturbed soils shall be compacted to 957o of the maximum density as determined by
ASTM method D-1557. The contractor may need to add water (or dry during the
winter) to achieve proper compaction.
3. The contractor shall remove any unsuitable materials from under any slabs on grade
and pavement. This is estimated to be approximately 10" from the existing ground
surface. The e)dsting soils below the unsuitable layer may be used for structural fill but
will require special compaction methods and effort to achieve adequate compaction.
PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
The unsuitable upper site soils (about 8" to 12") of the existing site soils shall be
removed from the areas to receive pavement. The site subgrade should be compacted
to a minimum of 957o of the maximum density as determined by WSDOT test method
no. 609 or ASTM D-1557. The pavement section should have a minimum of 1.5 inches
of crushed surface top course and the surfacing should be Class B asphalt cement
pavement minimum 2 inches thick placed in accordance with the Washington State
Department of Transportation specifications.
EARTHWORK CRITERIA
Earthwork should be performed in accordance with the WSDOT Standard
Specifications Division 2 sections 2-01, 2-02, 2-09 and 2-10 except as modified herein.
Any material used for fill shall be free of roots, wood or other deleterious materials.
Fills placed under structures should be compacted to a minimum of 957o of the
maximum density as determined by WSDOT test method no, 609 or ASTM D4557.
Fills placed in other locations should be compacted to 9wo except for the final lift
which should be compacted to 955re.
17 Dec 2002 Page 4
12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856
E L CIVIL ENG
0
PAGE 06
21501 80th SW, Edtnonds, WA, Soils Evaluation
Utility trenches shall be compacted to 957o of maximum density. Backfill for
trenches shall consist of selected materials to assure adequate compaction. Selected
material may be existing materials or existing blended with imported granular fill
free of wood or other deleterious materials.
Utility trenches over 4' deep shall be either shored or sloped back at 1: 1.
High groundwater may be encountered when excavating utility trenches during the
winter or spring. The contractor shall be responsible for dewatering or otherwise
stabilizing the utility trenches to permit the excavation and installation of the
utilities.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
The proposed improvements will require erosion and sediment control in accordance
with City of Edmonds requirements.
The soils are moderately erodible and have some cohesion and can be easily
transported from the site. The soils are poorly drained so that direct runoff will occur
with medium sized rain events. Special runoff controls should not be required during
construction but may become necessary if site work is performed in the winter..
The following shall be observed and performed at the site during construction:
I . During construction all haul equipment and transport vebicles shall be kept on
the hard surfaces or special gravelled areas so that soil is not transported from the site.
2. Catch basins shall be protected from sediments from the site.
3. A low area of approximately 200 sf and I foot deep should be left near the
eastern end of the site to collect any site runoff during construction.
4. Site soils are moderately erodible. Excavated soils shall be stockpiled so as to
prevent soils from eroding and being transported from the site. This may require
covering sod stock piles.
5. Install a silt fence or other diversion berm along the east side of the site to
prevent runoff from flowing easterly from the site.
17 Dec 2002 Page 5
12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856 E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 07
21501 80th SW, Edmonds, WA, Sods Evaluation
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
I. Preconstruction meeft
2. Install erosion control measurer,
3. Clear/ grub site demolish existing structures
4. excavate foundation, remove excess soil
5. Place foundation
6. Install subsurface drainage and storm drainage
7. Backfill foundation and complete grading, remove surplus soil.
8. Install permanent soil cover, seed exposed areas and landscape
9. Clean storm drain and place in service
MINIMUM RISK STATEMENT
The proposed development when constructed in accordance with these recommendations
will have minimal risk of damage from soil instability and wdll pose minimal risk to
adjacent properties from soil movement.
Edward C. Robisw� P.E.
Z--
17 Dec 2002
Page 6
12/17/2002 15:33 2538580856 E L CIVIL ENG PAGE 08
co
�.3 m
IC-Imm I
;POW-
14
op c f
rl
5,09, 41
-&I, ell
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CU�IWOO AMA"
2mm St. &W
A-= 40
12/17/2002 15:33
2538580856
E L CIVIL ENG
...........
14
4—
44K
uj
Z
ruk
I *..'d 'lcz^
.4e)
y
_Tj
f'16
Ar.
. ..... :
A91116 ANIL
Now
mw
SSMH
RIA4=106.OJ
I.E.=98.05
OA.)
Nl� , 0,:� -
toh N
T
APPROVED BY PLANNING
ca
RIM= 105.70
I.E. 100. 18
>-, 40
S�T NAIL TOP
50
S
IFENCE POST .9-1
x -44.
(Z5 \g
man jo.
. 4 0,
A 0.0
C=D51�1� Cb
—'a ., % �D
bo b,. x
Ci 0.5,
olb b6i
QF
shoo -
EX.
W C3 - CHAINLIN,K r?kE
x
4�
q
>
cs
DUST. 14SE
741
tK 0 Z
ilP 00)
bq. NQ x �C6.
Ott zw
xj
4(4
41/03 15 vo
SA . -1�� \,.3 (�� � - I,
IAW�
30. 150.00
x x cl
x
np el, --kY15 "E
to
ca
RIM= 102.9 7
E. 98.12 065T—RU! L
1-n
W
CITY OF EDMONDS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
WORK
ADDRESS
0 W N E R
APPROV , E DATE:
BLDG. OFFICIAL
prERM9T NUMBER
C-V
c� zo I
(4
0
70
STREET FILE
m EB^
u
w6owle
,#V .1 &
E
.fit
KLf.
'"CZEYLED
FED 2 � -,-li
46�,)
PERMIT CC)UNTER
0
0
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form,is to A prope
rty owner, or his/her authorized re
presentative,
Tevtl �mu
be filled out by any person preparing a opinehi* st-fill-iout the-checklist'iign and 'submit it
Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior tol .Ciiy. 1..he�-Cftywoll revieN�, -the: checklist,. make a
his/her submittal of the application to the City. precursory site visit, and make a; determination of the
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to iubsdiluent- stepil necessaky'to complete a dev�lopment
determine whether any potential Critical Areas 'are, �of permit-Oplication.
may be, present on the subject property. The infor mation - Please submit a vicinity -map, along with the signed copy
needed to complete the Checklist should be ..,easily.,. of this form to assist Cit
y,,staff in finding and locating the
available from observations of the site or data available",at s"'eicific of prop,rt d" 'f- In
,p a"s
p piece y e crib6 on this orm
J
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or sbil' "addifibn," the apoliiciiit 'shall include other pertinent
surveys). 406imatiorit (e.g.. 4ite,plani topography map, etc.) or
sWdies,in coniunctionmith this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
The undersigned applicant, and his/her/itp, heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing, of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend and'hold the City of Edmonds ii�ixmless from any and all damages". incl I uding reasonable
attorney's fees, arising from any. action or infraction, based in whole or -part upon false, misleading,- inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and,exhibits. herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that.I am authorized to file' this'application. 6i� the -behalf of the own6ras listed' below.
SIGNATURE OF*APPLIcANT/AGENT. DATE
Property Owner's Authorization
By my signature, I certify that I have authoYized the Zove Aipplicant/Agent to, apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials. and the staff of City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and postin ttendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
Owner/Applicant:
NAAv&O AIK tA44&J
?4a. -me
7mx amoods- wj#*� -4 Z (a
Street Address I
WE —Wh 0 W A 0
city State Zip
DATE
;NT CLEARLY
ApplicantROpr"e"senta-ttv'e:
Name
�00 (A
Street Address!
�;A vywwds Pr q90-20
St.+.
Pity zip
Telephone"4 S�) -7 -7 1 - -7 c9 -7 0 Telephone:.,( qz�o 77�- -won
Email address (optional): V\Q +Plan aby)so �01. Cmo * Email -Address (o . ptional): - JMg4 S orl� cho pi ro. (OW
Critical Areas Check] ist.doc/3.19.2001
W. CA File No:
d'Itical Areas. Checklist
Site, Inforniation' (sofi s"'I/I topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
1.
2.
5.
4.
Site Address'/ Location:
Property Tax Account N
S. ., S.
A oximate ite ize'(acresor s4u are feet): _.�15,000 -_50 ;-A+.
PPT
Is this- site currently developed? )(yes; no.
If, yes; how is, site developed?
5. DescIl-be the -general site topogra0hy. Chkkia that -apply.,
V/ Flat less than 5-feet elevation c:hange over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site: generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: present' -on site 6Y 'mcoie th�in 15% and less than 30% a vertical rise of 10-feet
on di�ianc'.4`33
over a h
Steep: grades�of-:greaterthanW%
present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distaAce of less ithan 33-feet).�.
Other (please describe):
6. Site,c6n'tains areas of eAr-round standing w atier: Approx. Depth:
y
7. Site.contains areas of seasonal standing water: No� ;Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in thelloo'dwai A.16— flooqplain, of awater course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows acrosO,� - grg ss ace? Flows are -round?
#te -year
MAA
Flows are wseasonal? - -- - �1- '
year.
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed
urba'n'l'andsca'p'ed'oAwh;shrtibs "Otc)
j
11. Obvious wetland is presentiDn site::
__ Mn
4.114L
A. Z
YT,
. 1"W
11-71
R-4
�y`
Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001
0
DATE RECEIVED
PERMITEXPIRES
USE
PERMIT
CITY OF EDMONDS
ZONE
NUMBER �m 3
JO
SUITE/APTq
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
AD:RESS
2_1C_z10!1\ ec)
17'W
OWNER NAME1 SINES
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
LID FEE S
IC
W
MAILIN ADD IESS
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP A�P.,Zadl
RW Pa.
z
'2��p
EXISTING — PROPOSED
Street Use Permit Rq.
inspection Required
Sidewalk Required 13
CITY ZIP
TELEPAONE
abcao,
izfzcr-'T� viz:7z)
REQUIRED DEDICATION—
FT
I UnderWound
�requuad
NAME
METER SIZE LINE
SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PT
V 7EQUIRED
-YES 13 NO 11
E
ADDRESS
REMARKS
z
z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
CITY, zip,
TELEPHONE
114 14 bb
NAME jCBL#
ENG' !NEERING REVIEWED BY D E
ADDRESS
0
sl,4 7-0�1
FIRE -REVIEWED By
IF IF
DATE
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
0
LANCE QR CU,
,,SHORELINE ORAD B#
INSPECTION
BOND
POSTED
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE;
-,V—CHECKED
REQLD;
YESqNO
$
stPA14EviEw..::
'COMPLETE EXEMPT�'.,
CIGN AREA.-.
"ALLOWED ' PROPOSED
- -
HEIGHT
'ALLOWED PROPOSED
_j
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT, PARCEL No.
�
LU
I
04S`iZ%1 cr%v 0 U-1 c1c)
" 1
A
EXP
RESIDENTIAL
El NEW PLUMBING MECH
LOT COVERAGE
'REQUIRED. SETBACKS (Fr)--
-PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
ALLOWED PROPOSED
FRONT SIDE REAR
FRONT L/R SIDE REAR
2
COMPLIANCE OR
ADDITION COMMERCIAL*
0 CHANGE OF USE
REMODEL E] MULTIFAMILY E] SIGN
z
5
9L
PARKING
REWOVIDED 1.
LOT AREA
PLA���EWED, By 6ATE
REPAIR GRADING - FENCE
REMARKS
CYDS X FT)
DEMOLISH TANK
GARAGE RETAINING WALL,.
CARPORT PlOcytky, L_J FIRE ALARM
7
z
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS Ct%%STTrTYi, IN:
CHECKED By
10M
9jTRU)1_tISN
OCCUPANT
-GROUP
NUMBER
NUMBER OF
CRITICAL
cu
ul
Q_ j
ri T_
SPECIAL INSPEi
OCCUPANT
OF
DWELLI . NG*.
AREAS
L17
0'
STORIES
NUMBER�02—)
REOUIRED.13 YES.
LOAD
DE!=�rE DONE
Qka\ \2j�� C_
R EMARKS
z
PROGRESS INSPECTIONSPER U801.08/FINAL INSPECTION REGeD
'-rO .13rr, 1L-2f412 f b?-
s
VALUATION
$
4 -
Dlikirlption
FEE
Description
Plan Ch eck
State Surcharge
OFFEE
HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % _jLOT SLOPE %
77 1
7',
Buildiln'igj�errnitt
City Surcharge
PLAN CHECK NO- VESTED DATE
Plumbing.
Mechanical
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
I=
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
Grading
9
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
j
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
Lu
PERMIT APPUCATION: ISO DAYS
06
PERMIT UMM I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 1180DAYS
1-=13gg laspectieR
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Fire Review
PlanChk.Deposft .1d__X%_
T--.Z
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
--..#
2
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
I
Fire rispection
Receipt #
ZA�
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFX WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
Landscapeinsp.
Total Amt. Due
0
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
I
Recording Fee
Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER. OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
APPLICATION APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN
VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged In space provided.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSA
��URANCE AND RCW 18.27o
SIGIU.8 OWNER kR AG�ENln) GNED
(425)
[A GNATP 31
L�Ajb
771-0220
R SED 6 DATE
ATTENTION
Off 1333
`71-4
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
J) M
A
FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
OR:GINAL-FILE - YELL6w - INSPVOR
04/02
P NK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN - ACCOUNTING
E RECEIVED
- '
I/
�/
PERMIT EXPIRES 7
CITY OF EDMONDS
6 E PERMIT
ZONE NUMBER&490 0!5#?
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
Fo `6 ke, PJ fdwifinC1541
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSI ESS FT IR&A)m I-pr
P LAT NAMEISUBDIVISION NO
LOT NO.
LID NO.
jq2_
CC
MAILING ADDRESS
L
q-lql edmt)nds IA)aA-A PMB ;;tto
PUBLIC RIGHT OFrAY PER OFFICIAL S EET MAP
T
TESCP Approved
Rw Permit Required
Street Use Permit Req'd 13
CITY
TELEAHONE
EXISTING PROP BED
I
Inspection Required
Sidealk Required
1az5_)7-7/-7a-7Q
REQUIRED DEDICATIO FT
underground
Wifing required
NAME
METER SI LINE
;74k I
SIZE
k
NO. OF FIXTURES
I
P
13
3
v Sh"i ro Arc�ikas
I
2
!� e
YESWEOUIRED
NO
I=
ADDRESS
REMARKS
W
z
z
x
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLIDRAINAGE
8
Z
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
lgzuia
4i� OZX-
I &WA64S q a 20
g
Nzs-) "'K __gqlco
&L/ I
I A06myk)3 -
NAME
CBL#
cc
Na4lo') Gn
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY
g
ADDRESS
0
I-jq 2
41
Fl W By DATE
ul
0
CITY
:FELgPHONE
4
x
tj
e4mend.%
'OR
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
fRIANCE OR jZ;b ; ,
SHORELINE I
ADB#
INSPECTION
^EO'D
B OND
POSTED
NALU NP 1, P,
I
If§ 13NO
(
$_jI
-4'9
SEPA REVIEW.
SIGN AREA
HEIGHT
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT. PARCE�N_
COMPLE)E EXEMPT,,,
ALLOWED PROPOSED
ALLOWED PROPOSED
.2 -7 6 4 -�Q Od 06-7 0
EXP
%
1!�) 0 I
NEW
"E]' RESIDENTIAL
PLUMBING MECH
LOT,COVERAG
ALLOWED PROPOS
REQUIRED SETB ACKS (ft)z
FRONT SIDE REAR
"P ROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.
FRONT L/RSIDE REAR
ADDITION
OMMERCIAL
-p C
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
q-0 L
bZ 141
.1 5
-15 101 1 FES
z
z
REMODEL
:1
MULnFAMI LY
E) SIGN
PARKING 1�-
REGM�ROVIDED
LOT AREA
I PLAP G BY DATE
ININ� REVIEWED
11�n
7
FENCS
cool
REPAIR GRADING j
CYDS FT)
4k S
OTHER.%
DEMOLISH El TANK
GARAGE 0.�,8127AMINGWALL,_ FIRE SPRINKLER,"-".
E11FIRE
z
CARPORT ROCKERY..�`:_ ALARM
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR A7n EXP N-
TY)
14 u i4q
T
TYPE.SF CKI RUCTION
CODE;
OCCUPANT
ul
.
NUMBER
OF
14UMBER OF"
DWELLING
CRITICA&L
A
_I
VA
GROUP
SPECIAL INSPECTIOP
OCCUPANT
0
STORIES
UNITS
N F
REQUIRED [] YES
LOAD
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS'PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
AL)
&J-PM
A .
fna
VALUATION
'Poch UAL VA
lq_q
IA"" a5 If vo&,!�
Description
_4FEE.
Des1ription
FEE
I j
PlanCheck
State Surcharge
HEAT OURCE
GLAZING %
%ILOTI�kOPE %
1 V�
City Surcharge
00
4 jjQ�r!e-,
,BuildinC"t;
.&Frrnit
PLAN CHECKJPO:
204 - 4W -3
VESTED DATE
:Plumbiligy
-A -
_a,
go
-
Mechanical
fto
6
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
hi
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
Grading
Puldn
q1 )
:2,
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
to
L/.
t:
2
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
W
W
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT ILIMM I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN -180 DAYS
Engr. Inspection
Z30,
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
Fire Review
50",
Plan Chk. Deposit.,1
74_'5-
2
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Inspection
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
Landscapelnsp.
Total Amt. Du
z
X,
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
Recording Fee
Receipt #
e2
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
APPLICATION
APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Foes are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
receipt Is acknowledged In space provided.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
OFFICIA,*�bIGINE TE
SIGNATURE (OWNER frAGEtTV -
1
DATE SIGNED
(34, 13
IA95)
I-TA6
Q5
C;,�J_4
771-0220
-BY
-
R ASED DATE
ATTENTION 0
Eff 1333
91
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A
FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
ORIGINAL - FILE - YrI LOW - INSPPI/TOR
.CATE
PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR
04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN - ACCOUNTING
DATE RECEIVED
PERMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE PERMIT
ZONE
NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
;?/sa- f5o#, Atq- W,
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS -Mitq
hyq(6�)
X
f JII2
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
IC
lu
MAILING ADDRESS
LID FEE $
qV2 &MA145 1�4-(A
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL 19TR MAP
EXISTIN aj!��
TIESCIPApproved
AW Perordt Required
Street Use Pemil RaqV
:t1on Required
CITY ZIP
T91EPHONE
PROPSE)
Siamalk Required
&"OMs q80;2,0
CzI2�) -7-7 j --7.2 -70
REQUIRED DEDICA1
Undergmund
Wiring required
NAME 101
METER SIZE
1.14 SIZE
NO. O� FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
13
V
156
YE NO 0 .3
UA
ADDRESS
REMARKS
z
z
x
OWNERMONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
&-43?e:::8t;0 02610S
%4
1�-SEf =,C)L,
NAME
CBL#
Cba-:��h iian,
74�" 92
Aw in
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY
;Ar
0
ADDRESS
�t'
Zgf'.'��A`tJ�
q q I-PA��
. 4; ,
A)P�
A V11 F- fir
DATE
W
CITY ZIP
-fEL9PHOhE
U.
0
ed m6nds qgwn
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
4RIANCE OF(CU
SHORELINE OR ADB#.
INS ECTION
EQ'D
BOND
POSTED
ONOI
:Y?—
fb(0211)
4) A Uj 21
SEPA REVIEW,,'
C9MPL§,TE E XEMPT.*
SIGN AREA:,`
ALLOWED PROPOSED
HEIGHT
,� ALLOWED
4-
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT, PARCEL NO.
"p,
2-1 Ina2g) e5n"&7
A
)�(NEW
RESIDENTIAL
PLUMBING MECH
LOT COVERAGE_;)�
ALLOWED PROPOSE0-
REQUIRED SETBACKS (F�,)-.
FRONT, SIDE REAR
-PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT L/R SIDE REAR
E] ADDITION
�E],COMIVIERCIAL
COMPLIANCE OR
' -. ' 'r
C3 CHANGE OF USE
I
g;A", 10 1 i
z
REMODEL
MULTIFAMILY
El SIGN
PARKING
RECY04t PROVIDED
LOT AREA
PLA NG REVIEWED By DATE
I
I a
1 1
FENCE
REPAIR GRADING X
CYDS FI)
,2
KJX�C�
OTHER.,
DEMOLISH TANK
RETANING WALL
=FE FIRE'§PRIN'KLER
z
IT ROCKERY A—J FIRE ALARM
0
rL
P�AE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTFVI PLAIN: . I I
FE
MW Muslv)dl
I
CHtj!MT1PEQg
CIPINISTRUCTION
COgf
OCCUPANT
59
GROUP
ri
NUMBER IMNUIMBrF
OF
OF T
DWELLING
-
CRITICZ spy
W17f
AREASW
SPECIAL INSPECTION
OCCUPANT 1
0
STORIES
UNITS.",:
.'REQUIRED
-1117
"j
.16OAD
�06
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS 1496 PX0 k,- — I
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC -1.04/FINAL INSPECTION RE D
z
9
A)"
low
-P�r kkn2f.A
mom" A
ff"r.r-, j C44 iA /I Ili, lit/
VALUATION
e. 42,01r, �9A U6i--,
-Description,
FEE
,_,FE
De scription
FEE
Plan Check'
IMK Ill
State Surcharge
HEAT SOURCE
GLAZIN
)LOT-,S - LOPE! %
City Surcharge
60
jBuilding�pprrnrii�
PLAN CHECK NQ:
VESTED DATE
lPlurnbihig
Mechanical
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
I=
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
Grading
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
Lu
PERMIT APPLICATION: ISO DAYS
IL
PERMIT IJMIr I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHJN-180 DAYS
Engr. Inspection
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT. ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Fire Review
Plan Chk. Depos
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
2
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Inspection
Receipt #
4X4 7
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
0
-j
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
Landscapeinsp.
�4 1
4e e
Total Amt. Due
W;&050
0
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENF6RCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.-
Recording Fee
.
lReceipt
#
z// e3
I- HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION
APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I Am THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLAT ON OF THE LA13OR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN!S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
(425)
Icl IG E E
SIGNATURE (OWNER AGEkT)-
Cf A
DATE SIGNED
(!5r(f NN-,%b, (Z 1
771-0220
A
DATE
ATTENTION -N�21 IEL �PT a 0
EXT 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF -OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
ORIGINAL - FI F - INSPECTOR
PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR
04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN - ACCOUNTING
City of Edmonds Permit No:"V _5
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date:
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: L/J
B. Type of Work (be specific): 11 T1 G1 I Q_'��T_l 041
C. Contractor: , . .-A 1 %P
Contact:—
C-1 S� AS V�2j_olpphone:
Mailing Address: 4;��,A vyK,
State License L_uy�kpt Zv- C� oi,� c,7�R_ Liability Insurance: Bond: $
cffl:�19 __eols�y
D. Building Permit # (if applicable): ;12a4 4 Yx Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E.
El
A
INSPECTOR: WCptJgrU_,
F. PAVEMENT CUT: [I YES [I NO
CONCRETE CUT: 0 YES 0 NO
Commercial Ej Subdivision 0 CityProject El EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD)
Multi -Family El Single Family r_1 Other
Q. SIZE OF CUT X
INDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harmless from
injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or.unforeseen, that may be made against the City of
Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense
costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLL097NG THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS
COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICHTIMEA DEBITOR CREDIT W!LL BEPROCESSED FORISSUANCE TO THEAPPLIC4NT.
* Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every'
flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the
required training in their possession.
* Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City -
approved material prior to the end of the workday - NO EXCEPTIONS.
* Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application.
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
I HA VE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE
THATIMUSTM KE7 PINK COPY OF THE PERMITA VAILABLE ON SITE A TALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS
Signature: Date: -22---c-)
(Contractor or Aaent)
IWO,
UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326)
FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK.
Inspector's Signature
DATE:
For inspection requirements see Engineering Inspection Information handout.
NO WORK SHALL BE(I'lN NZ101Z TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
D:Wy Documents\Forms\Engnrng\ROWpermit_.doc
wDATE RECEIVED
11 )IA6P I
%tif" CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAMFJNAME OF BUSINESS
C
. [Wy I f 6 M a4a
MAILING ADDRESS
qlU &dmoyads VJuA #20P
CITY ZIP I TELEPHONE
NAME
1 1, UP -
ADDRESS
, ,�j 14. C,
zl� TELEPHONE
- I
-I =bZ#ji==1Kw_T&xV DIM-MA311kall-om
[PERMIT EXPIRES
USE PERMIT
ZONE
NUMBERO*X—&t)4
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
-11501 - mmirds
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LID NO.
.
LID FEE $
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCIP Approved
RW Permit Required 0
Street Ueo Permit Req-d C]
EXISTING
0 11
Inspection Required 0
Required 0
9P_!!2U1f=j
Sidewalk
REQUIRED DEDICATION—
nderground
Wtft required C3
METER SI?? 1�1 Wwsur
91411IMUIRED
0
"L=E�4j
11 DB SEW MUST Big CAWW&sa
. NO C3
3
M
Lu
REMARKS — NE
z
z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
0
Ab WATRR MWMR 'M 11111111 2911811PI11111111101110111111%
z
Lu
V LX I V 1LkV1 11, JUR 1 .4 LAk%-t I _1111 YN.0-F, I V 1A 11A I I 14
-"Nct�,!zlf t;,HBCK ST ON BACK OF7ffr.A"
w
MQUW"BM
ADDRESS
(mg-2 64mro's W&A "', i
.4�INSPECTIQN
FIRE BY DATE
N
w
IL
CITY zlo� -TELEPHONE
72770
, VARIANCE OR dU
��7SHORELINE 0R,,ADB#
INSPECTION
REO'D
BOND
POSTED
STATE LICENSE NUMBER -nPIRMION, DATE 'CHECKED 13Y
KA LU f4A.Iq
0 YES 0 NO
SEPA REVIEW
�COMPLETE EXEMPT
-AREA
ALLOWED 'PROPOSED
HEIGHT
.',ALLOWED PROPOSED
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL�NO.
1-1 00-
I
EXP
V
0 NEW RESID, E NtIAL PLUMBING/tME H.
LOTCOVERAGE,
ALLOWED s006POSED�-
REQUIRED SETBACKS,(FT.)
FR6Nt::: SIDE' REAR
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT- UR SIDE REAR
.11
0
C] AUDITION Zl COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR
A
z
�CHANGEOFUSE
APARTMEN
C] REMODEL CY 13 SIGN
z
IL
PARKING.:::
REQ*D�l ROVIDED 1
�LOTAREA
NING:AtVItWED'Eff DATE
PLAN...
REPAIR o -GRADING o FENCE X' FT)'
CYDS
AR S
DEMOLISH OTHER
CY TANK C:]
oGARAGE 0 RETAINING WALL FIENEWAL
CARPORT ROCKERY
(TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
CHECKER BY
TYPEQF CONSTRUCTION
dODE_�_ OCCUPANT
Z2
: ,
- - GROUP
1.�, 497
NUMBER
NbhiifFfOF
CRITICAL
LO-0 11�W
SPECIAL INSPECTOR,
AREA OCCUPANT
OF
�_
DWELLING
I
AREAS
STORIES
UNITS
NUMBER 'o,,a
REQUIRED C] Yl
LOAD
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS*
PROGRESS. 114SPECTIONS PER UBC'1,08/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
a M 1564G
57/
-T,
J.
AA&,.Af-.. AMA
AA
Sal
VALUATION
FEE
%ft it L a a QA
L - 0,4-
PLAN CHECK FEE!
HEAT SOUROW GLAZING % LOT SLOPE %
Fla+
1�.PLAN CHECK NO: IVESTED DATE
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
*APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
NOR LIM IT IN ANY WAYTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDI NANCE PROVISION."
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT. AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
TION; AND IN DO NG THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
It
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
SIGN URE (OWNER 00�f DATE SI NED
J6-2-
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
5/98
MECHANICAL
GRADING/FILL
STATE SURCHARGE
ENG. REVIEW FEES
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
LANDSCAPING
INSPECTION FEE
RECEIPT
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE RECEIPT
APPLICATION APPROVAL
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
FOR INSPECTION
receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
(425)
OF LS SIG RE DATE
771-0220
RELEASED BY
EXT/333
771-0221
ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR
FAX
PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
July 17, 200S
To: Edmonds.City Council
Subject:
RECEIVE
JUL I S 2005
EDMONDS CITY CLER
Laura Caparroso requests that the City of Edmonds Install tactile domes for the blind on the north
wheelchair ramp crossing at 216th St. Wand 76th Avenue West.
Laura Caparroso requests that the City of Edmonds Install an audio Pedestrian si-qnal at the same
crossing.
Laura Caparroso-moved to the city of Edmonds 8 months ago and now owns a town home
at'j2-1503 80th �Cv;n6� W"� She is totally blind, uses an assist animal for moving about the
neliihb-�'r—�-ood and -as —es public transportation for her work day commutes to her 5 day�a-week job
in Seattle. To procure groceries, Laura walks from her home to Top Foods, the closest grocery
store. She must cross 76th Avenue West and considers the crosswalk at the intersection of 76th
Avenue West and 220th St. S.W. dangerous. She considers this crossing unsafe because of the
speed of drivers making right hand turns on the red light at 220th St. S.W. and their tendency not
to come to a complete halt before turning right.
Therefore, Laura requests that the City of Edmonds Install tactile domes on the north
wheelchair ramp crossing at 216th St. SW. and 76th Avenue West.
There are 2 wheelchair ramp crossings at 216th St. SW. By placing the tactile domes on
the north crossing, Laura will not have to navigate a second crossing on 216th St. SW.
Also, there is no audio pedestrian signal on the 216th St. SW crossing signal. Laura says
that she can hear the traffic stop, but we think that in storm conditions, an audio pedestrian signal
will be far safer.
Please consider the importance of funding and Implementing these safety requests as
soon as possible.
Respectfully,
Laura Caparroso
21503 80th Ave. West
Edmonds, WA-
425-673-7919
caparrosoAcomcast. net
IN4C� 4 4r,
Steve and Ginny Burger (friends)
22910 102nd Place West
Edmonds, WA, 98020
425-776-4896 �Jz- " Z�Z"�
spbunger0aft.net
City of Edmonds
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: :71,421j23
7
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction:
B. Type of Work (be specific): I) T1 (JM4 1 kwyu
,okll ai kop I ly A&VMy rnn 6 q 91 aiIJA4
C. Contractor: f0PQ1!-.&QC7�C_ Contact: C 3 P_
�"_Lp'fftone:
Mailing Address: E;
State License #..: L_Uk%NA awc� �2S Liability Insurance: Bond:$
CW9 el
D. Building Permit A(if applicable): Z044 * 0— Z-7-71 Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
VOI-F ;'lip — C-e —d %.� W 1. .
Permit No:4,0:5_014?
'E. Commercial El Subdivision El City Project El EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD)
Multi -Family El Single Family r-1 Other
INSPECTOR:
F. PAVEMENT CUT: El YES [I NO G.' SIZE OF CUT X
CONCRETE CUT: F1 YES El NO
A PPL I C A NT TO IZEAI) ANI) SIGN
INDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his/her. signatu.re to this.,application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harmless fto'm.
injuries, damages or plaims of any kind or 'description whatsoever, foreseen or -unforeseen, that may be made against the - City of,
Edmonds -or any of its departments or enifiloyees, including but not. limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense,,,'
costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF, THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES W1LL BE HELD UNTIL THE.FINAL-STREET PATCH IS
COMPCEIE)) BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH, TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APP I LICANT.
Traffic. control and public safety shall be in'accordance. with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. EveryL
flagger must-be.1rained as required:,by: (WACY 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying. completion of the
jeqtiired training in their possession.
* Restoration is to be in accordance With City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched', with asphalt or City -
approved -material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS.
* Theee sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application.
CALL DIAL-A-DI.G (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
I HA VE READ THE ABOVESTA TEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE
THA T I MUST M THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT A VAILABLE ON SITE A T ALL TIMESFOR INSPECTIONS
'7)
Signature: Z., Date:
(Contractor or �kgent)
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Approved by: AL1(:::0 Right-of-way Fee: -
sru 'ion Fee/Fun
Time Authorized: Void After' :2 L-041 Di pt d Ill:
'01W
rp
UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326)
FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK.
DATE: -
Inspqctor's. Signature
For inspection requirements see Engineering Inspection Information handout.
I-
7
J D:\My,Documents\Forms\Engnmg\ROWpermit—.doc
M
8/13-/'G� 5:9:6 pm
Dean Hough &'Associates
page 1
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
�11 1 8 dT;H
X- NEW x I F
DOW,
APPENlYIX A:DETENT-10N
VOL-2,10,100YR-24HR
BASIN
SUMMARY ,V#f[7
BASIN ID: A100DEV
NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:100YR DEV.
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..: 0.10 Acres
0.28 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 90.00
98.00
TC .... : 10.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.24 cfs
VOL: 0.08
Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN ID: A100EX
NAME: BASIN
A 6U APT SITE:100YR EX
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..: 0.38 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 81.00
98.00
TC .... : 38.19 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet L:
160.00 ns:0.4000
p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313
PEAK RATE: 0.08 cfs
VOL: 0.04
Ac-ft TIME: 520 min
BASIN ID: A10DEV
NAME: BASIN
A 6U APT SITE:10YR DEV.
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
2.00 inches
AREA..: 0.10 Acres
0.28 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 90.00
98.00
TC .... : 10.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.15 cfs
VOL: 0.05
Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN -ID: A10EX
NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR EX
SCS METHODOLOGY
z
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
2.00 inches
AREA..: 0.38 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 81.00
98.00
TC .... : 38.19 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313
PEAK.R.ATE: 0.03 cfs VOL: 0.02 Ac-ft TIME: 520 min
r
e'
r4e-,,q, �-- ,
4 03
L)
8/13/03 5:9:7 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 2
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: A2DEV
NAME: BASIN
A 6U APT SITE:2YR DEV.
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.50 inches
AREA..:
0.10 Acres
0.28 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... :
90.00
98.00
TC .... :
10.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.10
cfs VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN ID: A2EX
NAME: BASIN
A 6U APT SITE:2YR EX
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.50 inches
AREA..: 0.38 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 81.00
98.00
TC .... : 38.19 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L: 160.00 ns:0.4000
p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313
PEAK RATE: 0.01
cfs VOL: 0.01
Ac-ft TIME: 550 min
8/13/03 5:9:8 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 3
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1 0.014
1120
1512 cf
0.38
2 0.030
710
2151 cf
0.38
3 0.083
580
3458 cf
0.38
8/13/03 5:9:8 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 4
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR
STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. P1
Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE, PI
Diameter: 2.00 ft. Length: 349.00 ft.
Slope ... : 0.0000 ft/ft upstr: dnstr:
UNDERGROUND PIPE . ID No. P2
Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE,P2
Diameter: 3.00 f ' t. Length: 155.00 ft.
Slope... : 0.0000 ft/ft upstr: dnstr:
8/13/03 5:9:8 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 5
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST
MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 01
Description: ORIFICE COMBINED STRUCTURE,01
Outlet Elev: 98.20
Elev: 96.20 ft Orifice Diameter: 0.6416 in.
Elev: 100.00 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 1.0400 in.
Elev: 100.30 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 1.2598 in.
0 0
8/13/03 5:9:10 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 6
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION VOL:2,10,100YR-24HR
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE
< -------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (efs) (cfs) --id- --id- <wSTAGE> id (Cfs) VOL (cf)
2YR STORM DESIGN ............. 0.01 0.10 P2 01 99.88 1 0.01 632.;:=Cf
10YR STORM DESIGN ............ 0.03 0.15 P2 01 100.22 2 0.03 783.39 cf
100YR STORM DESIGN ........... 0.08 0.24 P2 01 100.97 3 0.08 1056.89 cf
Dean Nough
Phone: 425 335 0262
FAX: 425 335 0262
ASSOC1816S email: dddhough@juno.com
�7
,407#41 MJf,4
To:
Mr Lyle Chrisman
@Fax:
7710221
From:
Dean M Hough
Date:
August 15, 2063
Re:
Magnolia Court - Detention volume Provided
Pages:
8, including this
According to George Hanna of A D Shapiro, Architects you need justification of detention
volume to be provided in our latest revised plan submitted to you last week. I'm seeing a
discrepancy on size of the 36" N12 pipes along the west property line. The plan size of pipe
diameter is correct. The driveway profile has been changed to show 36" N12 pipe and also the
pipe table for pipes P5 and P8 in has been changed to 36", not 24" N12 pipe. This will make the
detention volume to meet the required volume.
Because the pipe size was reconfigured, my design calculations have been
changed for the 36" pipe and are attached. The elevations & sizing of orifices now agree with that
shown on revised sheet 1/4 (attached).
With this change noted above, the volume of detention provided in the driveway connector
pipe of 8" diameter, 44 If of 36" N12 pipe in north sideyard and 82' altogether of 36" pipe along
the west property line with catch basin and manholes is more than enough to meet design
requires shown in the TIR of November of 2002 on page 4 of Appendix A for 349' of 24" pipe. If
you have any questions, call me at 425 335 0262. Thanks, Dean Hough, PE
PIPE DIAMETER
(I N)
CU FT/L FT.
PIPE LENGTH
(FT)
VOLUME IN
NEW UNIT (CF)
36
7.07
82
579.7
36
7.07
44
311
8
0.35
132
46.1
MHs-48
12.57
3.5' DEEP X 5
EA
132
TYPE 1 CBs
5.33 CF X 3.5'
DEEP
3 EA
52.5
TOTAL
1,121.2 CU FT
PROVIDED VOL.
ORIGINAL = 24"
DIA
3.14
349
I
1,096.4 CU FT
REQUIRED VOL.
I I
cef
1)(5-
DEAN HOUGH& ASSOCIATES$
8918 11th St NE
Everett WA 98205-1407
Phone & Fax: 425-335-0262
......................................................................................................................
I �It
jo"� CONSTRUCTION PLAN
3) ?Ur ?
�!so �'
',,A TECHN ICAL INFORMATION REPORT
VA�
S t for City of Edmonds
0-,
V'i MAGNOLIA COURT TOWNHOMES
at 21501 80th Av W
For Mr Lyle Chrisman, Program Coordinator
Public Works Department
City of Edmonds, WA
Owner: Charlie Nathan/Nalund Construction
Prepared by
Dean M Hough, PE
July 19, 2002
CITY COPY
SEP 13 2002
BUILDING DEPT.
40 0
This T. 1. R. is submitted along with the four construction plans for the
drainage/grading of a 6 unit apartment complex in the City of Edmonds
addressed as 21501 80th Av W for Charlie Nathan of Nalund Construction
Co. This SEPA grading permit application is to comply with City of Edmonds
grading, requirements and the drainage is to comply with City Development
Code, Chapter 18.30 and City of Edmonds drainage ordinance requirements.
Part I The Project Proposal
A. Existing Conditions
This project is to obtain permits for grading -and providing storm
drainage and utility improvements for an apartment complex site just west of
the Edmonds-Woodway High school field.
The site is a single family residence with about 25 tall fir trees in the
backyard and which is fenced with 14' high laurel hedge and accessed with a
circular gravel driveway. The existing home will be removed to make way for
the development. It is situated on the east side of 80th Av W about 200' north
of 216th St SW. The site slopes from west to east about 5'feet in about 150'
or at 3.3% slope. To fit the two triplex units on the site, the foundations will be
lowered about 3' into the sloping hill.
Mr Tony Shapiro of ADS Architects is the architect and applicant for this
'N project. This apartment complex will take access off 80th Av W using a
central driveway that will drop down to make access to the common level
garages which front onto the east/west driveway. To provide grade
accommodations, three 3' rockeries or retaining walls will be used along the
front of the development, go half way along the north and south property lines
and at the east end of the driveway to match grade at the east property line. A
SEPA checklist for this development YAII be submitted by ADS Architects.
A review of the site shows a hill slooing east away from 80th Av. The
neighboring lot to the south is a dental office building and the lots north and
across the street are residential, single family developments of the last 40
years. Eightieth Av W rises going north to about 160'south of 212th St Sw
centerline to a crest and from there a number of catch basins on the west side
of 80th provide provide drainage which continues past site to 216th St and
then goes east on 76th Av; south in 76th to 220th, east in 220th under Hwy 99
4P 0
and into Halls Lake ravine. A number of 24" detention pipes line the central
driveway and also front the west property line along 80th Av W. The
foundation drains will bypass the restrictor manhole on the south to join the
proposed outlet pipe downstream of the detention system and then cross 80.th
Av to join an existing CB.
The drainage easement will encumber the full access driveway where a
double detention pipe is located. Also 10' of the 15' plus front setback is also
for placing and servicing the detention/storm drain system.
The apartment configuration is this - that the first floor is at elevation
102.0 and drops 6 inches into the garage. From the living space the patios will
be accessed with 3 steps of 6" to a common patio elevation of 100.5. The
backyard of all units will be flat at elevation 100.5 to provide venting air space.
As can be seen in Section B-B drainage going east along the natural grade
drops further over an approximate 3 to 4' retaining wall which extends into the
front face of both apartment buildings as seen in page 4b. The backyards will
be flat except for the east end of the east units to drain into the east property
line.
B. Offsite Analysis
The upstream area will be discussed in Part 11 Section B for Conveyance
Analysis.
Going downstream from the site, the existing storm drain goes south
along the east side of 80th Av W and goes subsurface in a 12" pipe to an
existing CB, called CB#2 as shown on DHA plan #1/4 The proposed
detention system will drain west and south to the existing CB#2, then continue
south in the existing system. After joining one more CB at the north side of
215th PI, it goes diagonally southwest to begin a storm drain trunk in the center
of the road and continues south. In the next major intersection of 80th with
216th St SW, there are two manholes which redirect flows east along the
centerline of 216th St.
There are about 19 catch basins north of the site and one manhole
which make up the storm drain system north of the site leading up to 212th St
SW. There is a north/south crest about 200' west of 80th Av and this system
picks up storm flows as seen in the DHA Drainage Basin Map on page 1 B. In
other words per the map about 4 acres of residential yards and about 14
houses are picked up. From the crest the maximum flow time is for sheet flow
from the northwest to the 213th PI intersection, and then drains south in the
approximate 20 catch basins and manhole which then meets the existing CB in
about 643.5 feet of pipe.
DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIATES
15-Jul-02
HYDROGRAPH IMPUT CALCULATION TABLE: Magnolia Court Apartmants - 6 units In City of Edmonds
ADDRESS: 21501 SM Av W
IMPERVIOUSIPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS: DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
3A0TU1=MT-Q r)P[VrWAY DATI('A
MI.Ar
LOT NO.
LENGTH
WIDTH
TOTAL AREA
LENGTH
WIDTH
TOTAL AREA
LENGTH
WIDTH
TOTALAREA
LENGTH
WIDTH
TOTALAREA
1
39.5
27.75
1096.125
140
24.5
3430
12
7
84
PER AU
0
2
39.5
27.75
1096.125
(PER AUTOCAD)
0
12
7
84
PER AU
1
1546
3
39.5
27.75
1096.125
(PER AUTOCAD)
0
12
7
84
(PER AU
0
4
39.5
27.75
1096. 1125
AUTOCAD)
0
12
7
84
PER AU
0
5
39.5
27.75
1096.125
_JffR
(PER AUTOCAD)
0
12
7
84
PER AU
0
6
39.5
27.75
1096.125
(PER AUTOCAD)
0
12
7
84
PER AU
0
ouo i v i mL innrcmv. oumr��c
IMPERVIOUSIPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS: EXISTING CONDITIONS
MIA"
LOTNO.
LENGTH( I WIDTH
ITOTALAREAI-\
LENGTH
I WIDTH
TOTAL AREA
i
271
15121
(!rR AUFOUAIJ)
0
2
-
1
1 z
01
SITE AREA = 150
SITE+IMPROV. = _Jff �UkD)
,-),uts i u i AL wrrKv. ouKriALr
BASIN PERVIOUS AREAS= TOTAL BASIN AREA LESS IMPERVI US AREAS SUCH AS ROOFS AND MISC. (ACCESS ROAD AREAS) NOTED IN ABOVE TABLES.
LEW MPERM U"
SITE + FRONT. IMPROV- APTs - DRIVEWAYSIPATIO - ROAD TOTAL SQ FT TOTAL ACRES PERVIOUS IMP AREA IN ACRES
4V �
DEV. BASIN A = 16546.00 6576.75 3934 1546.00 4489.25 0.103 ACRE 0.277 ACRE
EX. SITE 16546.00 1512 000 0.00 15034.00 0.345 ACRE 0.035 ACRE
W
12= 1-5" LiO = 2.(Y' k-100= WY'
USE (:Tn = 81 FOR TYPE C SOIL - ALDERWOOD URBAN LAN MPLEX
'D
USE Cn = 90 FOR TYPE C SOIL - ALDERWOOD URBAN COMPLEX
D
NOTE: THE ABOVE DATA IS PLUGGED INTO) WATERW RKS SSOFTWARE TO GET HYDROGRAPHS IN APPENDIX A PAGE 18, 2.
PAGE 2A
kaJ3-0- L-5
o-r
Hydi220i.1231
REMARKS
FRONTAGEIMPROV.
100 15000 SO FT
16548 SQ FT
P�
The downstream flow was established by field searching the 1500 feet
south and east to 76th Av W. In this reach the storm drain continues east as a
trunk along the centerline of 216th St SW using about 7 manholes about 5 to 6'
deep. This drainage system services the football field and the cul de sac
streets that are south of 216th st. The field visit and "popping" of manhole
covers showed flow in 76th Av W continuing south to 220th St and the City of
Edmonds utility map shows flow going east in 220th across Highway 99 to join
the Creek leading to Halls Lake. As a result of this the City's Ordinance
#18.30 was adhered to and a detention system that detains the 2, 10 and 100
year-24 hour storms is provided here. See Part 11, Section A for the detention
system design.
The soils map as shown on page 2a by SCS shows that the site is
mostly in type C soil and is typed as Alderwood Urban Land Complex, 2 to 8%
sloping. The soil is drainable, but is only shallow to about 24 to 36" deep
before the soil consolidates into glacial till.
Part 11 Drainage Design for the Grading Plan
A. Detention Design Calculations
A calculation of impervious surfaces for both existing and developed
conditions to determine the detention volume for the 2, 10 and 100 year storm
for the apartment development is shown on page 213, the Hydrograph Input
Calculation Table.
The above noted table shows that the impervious will include the
driveway, apartment buildings and street improvement areas and that the
existing condition involves second growth forest of alders with no impervious
surface other than the existing house. The area of the frontage improvements
including sidewalk and street widening was determined by Autocad. Also on
this table the storm intensities for the City of Edmonds is listed. The curve
numbers of 98 and 81 for impervious and second growth forest were used
here. After development the Cn rises to 90 for 50 to 75% grass on this type C
soil.
The route that water travels on site is indicated on page 1 of Appendix
as sheet flow from the west property line of the site going somewhat on a
diagonal and east to the east property line for 160 feet through second growth
forest at 3.1 % slope. The actual flow time for this small site becomes 38
minutes by the time it gets to the east property line. The Waterworks software
determines the peak 100 year storm peak flow on site in Basin A by creating
3
six hydrographs See page 1 and 2 of Appendix A. The Waterworks
calculations shows that there is about 0. 14 cfs increase in the 100 year - 24
hour peak in storm flow.
It should be noted that the time for concentration for developed
conditions will have a higher impervious area and therefore, developed flows
will be faster off site than the existing conditions. With the minimum standard
time of 10 minutes, the hydrograph for the developed conditions is maximum
and will provide the greatest possible difference and amount of storm flow to
detain to protect the existing downstream structures.
The calculation of detention calls for 349' of 24" diameter pipe;
therefore, the 324' of 24" diameter pipe provides 1018 cu. Ft and the volume
in the three type 11 manholes which is not included in the Waterworks
calculations provides the remaining 75 cu ft needed to fulfill required volume.
The 3 type 1 L catch basins volume would also provide more volume and
provides a little more safety factor for this system.
B. Culvert Conveyance Analysis
To check available capacity of the pipe going from the existing CB#2
south, the full developed 100 year-24 hour storm flow of 0.23 cfs is combined
at CB#2 to test that downstream pipe. Also the complete system of 3 pipes is
checked to make sure that the flows in these pipes will not overflow CB rims of
in the culverting system.
The upstream area which contributes flow to the storm drain system is
the 4.06 acres of residential area along both sides of 80th av W and west for
about 150'. The onsite flow of A100dev of 0.23 cfs is added at CB#2 to test
the downstream pipe, P1. . ,
A Waterworks Software network of pipes was made up and are seen
on page 4B. Pipe P2 goes from CB2 to CB4 and pipe, P2A, goes from CB#3
to CB#2. These two flow basins combine to test pipe, P1, with 2.33 ds. The
parameters that were used here are for future development. Full developed
conditions was used which requires a Cn of 90 for C type soil and goes to 98
for impervious areas. A time of concentration of 10 minutes was used in the
study. This provides a flow of 2.33 cfs and test pipe of 12" at 2.14% slope
shows only 38% of capacity used. This piping system through the 80th Av W
storm drain should be more than adequate at !2" diameter and as laid out.
Note that on page 3 of appendix B, the hydraulic grade line, HGL1 and 2 show
that all four CB's will not be overtopped with the combined 100yr-24hr storm
flows; therefore this system is adequate. See DHA plan C2 for the drainage
system layout.
4
0
_� �_7
51-
.1V
5R.,
3:
V)
04
CB#1 D
Y)
BEGIN TIME FLOW LINE
L=154.8' 0 1.29 % SHEET: GRASS &
PIPE LENGTH=643.8' 01.55
3:
(A
V)
n
Lo
04
c\I
CB#2
CB#3
PROJECT SITE
CB#4
BASIN A = 4.06 ACRES
DRAINAGE BASIN MAP
NOT TO SCALE
F-
(N
m
DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIATES
V.�
P2: C220113SN.DWG 7/13/02 PAGE 1 OB
f
40
Waterworks Printouts:
A. Detention Design Calculations page 1 -6
B. Culvert Conveyance Analysis page 1-6
P3Rmckupnobm$worktwordpW:c2201RP'r.LWP 7/15/02
7/15�02 12:8:41 am Dean Hough & Associates page 1
CITY OF EDMONDS.6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: A
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL ....
NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR EX
0.38 Acres
TYPElA
1.50 inches
10.00 min
BASEFLOWS:
AREA. . :
CN .... :
TC .... :
0.00 cfs
PERV
0.35 Acres
81.00
38.19 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313
PEAK RATE: 0.02 cfs VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min
BASIN ID: A10
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL ....
NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:10YR EX
0.38 Acres
TYPElA
2.00 inches
10.00 min
BASEFLOWS:
AREA. . :
CN .... :
TC.... :
0,00 cfs
PERV
0.35 Acres
81.00
38.19 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313
PEAK RATE: 0.04 cfs VOL: 0.02 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min
BASIN ID: A100
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL ....
NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:100YR EX
0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
TYPElA PERV
3.00 inches AREA..: 0.35 Acres
10.00 min (29 .... : 81.00
TC .... : 38.19 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 160.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0313
PEAK RATE: 0.09 cfs VOL: 0.04 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min
BASIN ID: A100DEV
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL ....
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
PEAK RATE: 0.23
(0
IM
90/.3 Acres
.00
10.00 min
0;/03 Acres
9 .00
10.00 min
/0
0 1 0/3 Acres
9 .00
10.00 min
NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:100YR DEV.
0.38 Acres BASEFLOWS:
TYPElA
3.00 inches AREA..:
10.00 min CN .... :
TC .... :
0.20
cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME
0.00 cfs
PERV
0.10 Acres
90.00
10. 00 min
500 min
IMP
0.28 Acres
98.00
10.00 min
7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean Hough & Associates page 2
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: A10DEV
NAME: BASIN
t 6U APT SITE:10YR DEV.
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
2.00 inches
AREA..:
0.10 Acres
0.28 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... :
90.00
98.00
TC .... :
10.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.14
cfs VOL: 0.05
Ac-ft TIME:,
500 min
BASIN ID: A2DEV
NAME: BASIN A 6U APT SITE:2YR DEV.
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.50 inches
AREA..:
0.10 Acres
0.28 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... :
90.00
98.00
TC .... :
10.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.10
cfs VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
�il
7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean Hough & Associates page 3
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1 0.016
980
1494'cf
0.38
2 0.037
630
2126 cf
0.38
3 0.090
560
3419 cf
0.38
7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean Hough
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 U14IT AP
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H
& Associates page 4
T: A D SHAPIRO
STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. P1
Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE, P1
Diameter: 2.00'ft. Length: 349.00 ft.
Slope ... : 0.0000 ft/ft upstr: dnstr:
0
7/15/02 12:8:42 am Dean Hough & Associates page 5
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST
MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 01
Description: ORIFICE COMBINED STRUCTURE,01
Outlet Elev: 98.40 /'
Elev: 96.40 Orifice Diameter: 0.7632 in.
Elev: 99.50 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 1.4883 in.
Elev: 99.70 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 1.2539 in.
0
7/15/02 12:8:46 am Dean Hough & Associates page 6
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX A:DETENTION DESIGN 2,10,100-24H
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH
INFLOW
-STO-
-DIS-
<-PEAK->
OUTFLOW
STORAGE
-------- DESCRIPTION --------- >
(cfs)
(cfs)
--id-
--id-
<-STAGE)
id
(cfs)
VOL (cf)
2YR STORM DESIGN .............
0.02
0.10
Pl
01
99.41
1
0.02
556.07 cf
10YR STORM DESIGN ............
0.04
0.14
PI
01
99.60
2
0.04
688.75 cf
100YR STORM DESIGN ...........
0.09
0.23
PI
01
100.05
3
0.09
968.21 cf
-7/15/02 1:4000 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 1
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN:100YR-24HR
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: A100DEV
NAME: BASIN
A 6U APT SITE:100YR DEV.
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.38 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..: 0.10 Acres
0.28 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 90.00
98.00
TC .... : 10.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.23
cfs VOL: 0.08
Ac-ft TIME: 500 min
BASIN ID: A -CONVEY
NAME: BASIN
A FOR 100YR24HR CONVEY.
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
4.06 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..: 2.54 Acres
1.52 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 90.00
98.00
TC .... : 26.24 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 154.80 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0129
TcReach - Channel L: 643.80 kc:42.00 s:0.0155
PEAK RATE: 2.10 cfs VOL: 0.75 Ac-ft TIME: 510 min
7/13/02 6:2:50 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 2
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1 2.330
510
35952 cf
4.44
2 0.034
650
2126 cf
0.38
3 0.083
580
3419 cf
0.38
0
49
7/13/02 6:2:50 pm
CITY OF
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV
APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE
Dean
EDMONDS 6
W
Hough & Associates page 3
UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
DESIGN 100YR-24HR
REACH SUMMARY
Hydraulic Gradeline for Reach HGL1
<-FROM-> <--TO--> <FLOW> floss Ent - RGL EntLoss ExtLoss OutLet Inlet AppRead BndHead JunHead HeadWtr -cb/mh-
-------- -------- cfs -loss- -Elev-- --loss- --loss- --Elev- --Elev- --loss- --loss- --loss- --Elev- --Rim--
CB#1 96.95
CB#2 CB#1 2.33 1.62 tw & dn <dc: Inlet Ctrl Assumed 98.63 0.11 0.00 0,01 98.53 102.97
CB#4 CB#2 2.10 2.06 tw & dn <dc: Inlet Ctrl Assumed 100.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.63 105.70
Hydraulic Gradeline for Reach HGL2
<-FROM-> <--TO--> <FLOW> floss Ent-HGL EntLoss ExtLoss OutLet Inlet AppRead BndHead JunHead HeadWtr -cb/mh-
-------- -------- efs -loss- -Blev-- --loss- --loss- --Elev- --Elev- --loss- --loss- --loss- --Elev- --Rim--
CB#2 98.32
CB#3 CB#2 0.23 0.28 98.60 0.00 0.00 98.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.60 104.20
Network Reach N1
REACH <-AREb <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q I PIPE Ndepth %Depth Vact Vfull C-Area
ID (Ad (f t) (ft) ft/ft ------ (Cfs) ------ (f t) ------ (fps) (fps)
P2A 4.06 1.00 155.05 0.0133 0.0120 2.10 43.73 0.48 48.25 5.59 6.27 A_CONVEY
Confluence with Network N2
P1 4.44 1.00 75.73 0.0214 0.0120 2 .33 38.27 0.45 44.70 6.86 7.96
Network Reach N2
REACH <-AREb <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN Q t PIPE Ndepth Bepth Vact Vfull C-Area
ID (Ac) (ft) (ft) ft/ft ------ (Cfs) ------ (ft) ------ (fps) (fps)
P2 0.38 1.00 56.73 0.0049 0.0120 0.23 7.95 0.20 19.77 2.11 3.82 A100DBV
PIPE REACH
From: CB#2 To:
Pipe Diameter:
Pipe Length
Up invert
Collection Area:
Design Flow
Pipe Capacity
Design Vel
Pipe Full Vel
ID, No. P1
CB#1
1.0000 ft
75.7280 ft
98.1200 ft
4.4400 Ac.
2.3300 cfs
6.0890 cfs
6.8570 fps
7.9564 fps
n: 0.0120
s: 0.0214
down invert:
Dsgn Depth:
Travel Time:
96.5000 ft
0.45 ft
0 . 18 min
7/13/02 6:2:51 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 4
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR
REACH SUMMARY
PIPE REACH
ID No. P2
From: CB#3 To:
CB#2
Pipe Diameter:
1.0000 ft
Pipe Length
56.7339 ft
Up invert
98.4000 ft
Collection Area:
0.3800 Ac.
Design Flow
0.2326 cfs
Pipe Capacity
2.9246 cfs
Design Vel
2.1146 fps
Pipe Full Vel
3.8216 fps
PIPE REACH
ID No. P2A
From: CB#4 To:
CB#2
Pipe Diameter:
1.0000 ft
Pipe Length : 155.0483
ft
Up invert : 100.1800
ft
Collection Area:
4.0600 Ac.
Design Flow
2.0984 cfs
Pipe Capacity
4.7986 cfs
Design Vel
5.5929 fps
Pipe Full Vel
6.2703 fps
n: 0.0120
s: 0.0049
down invert:
Dsgn Depth:
Travel Time:
n: 0.0120
s: 0.0133
down invert:
Dsgn Depth:
Travel Time:
98.1200 ft
0.20 ft
0.45 min
98.1200 ft
0.48 ft
0.46 min
7/13/02 '6:2:51 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 5
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR
STRUCTURE REPORT
EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#1
Location : DOWNSTREAM CB(DUMMY) @215PL SW North
Str Type :
East
Str Cat :
Catch Basin
Rim Elev
Area/sump:
4.00 sf/1.50 ft
Bottom El:
Cont Area:
Hgrade El:
Bend ..... :
No special shape
Ent type.:
Area/sump:
Ent Loss:
0.000 Exit: 0.000 App
Vel: 0.000 Junct:
Reach <Invert>
<Diam> < n >
<End>
Pi
96.500 12.00 0.012
Lower
EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#2
Location : CB#2 S/W OF SITE;W SIDE 80TH
Str Type : TYPE 1
Str Cat : Catch Basin
Area/sump: 4.00 sf/1.50 ft
Cont Area:
Bend ..... : No special shape
Ent type.: Area/sump:
Ent Loss: 0.027 Exit: 0.137 App, Vel:
North
East
Rim Elev
Bottom El:
Hgrade El:
1655.9930
1964.2850
102.0000
95.0000
96.9470 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
1731.7210
1964.2850
102.9700
96.6200
98.3177 ft
0.111 Junct: 0.010 Bend: 0.000
Reach
<Invert>
<Diam>
< n >
<End>
Pi
98.120
12.00
0.012
Upper
P2
98.120
12.00
0.012
Lower
P2A
98.120
12.00
0.012
Lower
PROPOSED STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#3
Location : CB#3 ON SITE RESTRICTOR CB(II) North
Str Type : TYPE 2-54 East
Str Cat : Catch Basin Rim Elev
Area/sump: 15.90 sf/4.00 ft Bottom El:
Cont Area: A100DEV Hgrade El:
Bend ..... : No special shape
Ent type.: Area/sump:
Ent Loss: 0.000 Exit: 0.001 App, Vel: 0.000 Junct:
Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End>
P2 98.400 12.00 0.012 Upper
1748.2850
2018.5470
104.2000
94.4000
98.5993 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
. 6 . - 0 0
7/13/02 6:2:51 pm Dean Hough & Associates page 6
CITY OF EDMONDS 6 UNIT APT: A D SHAPIRO
ADDRESS: 21501 80TH AV W
APPENDIX B:CONVEYANCE DESIGN 100YR-24HR
STRUCTURE REPORT
EXISTING STRUCTURE REACH ID No. CB#4
Location : CB#4 UPSTREAM @ N/215TH ST SW North
Str Type : TYPE 1 East
Str Cat : Catch Basin Rim Elev
Area/sump: 0.00 sf/4.00 ft Bottom El:
Cont Area: A —CONVEY Hgrade El:
Bend ..... : No special shape
Ent type.: Area/sump:
Ent Loss: 0.022 Exit: 0.111 App Vel: 0.000 Junct:
Reach <Invert> <Diam> < n > <End>
P2A 100.180 12.00 � 0.012 Upper
1886.7690
1963.9630
105.7000
96.1800
100.6344 ft
0.000 Bend: 0.000
REr,7-14*1VED
CITY OF EDMONDS JU-i 72
SEPA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIgIIELOPMEI;%;'�r SERVICES
WORK SHEET
Name of Proposed Project: MAC= &LOC-T-A Coo tP-T D5-0-2-r35 r8pFr
Owner/Applicant:
Name
Street/Maging Address
vvA 179020
city State zip
Telephone: A -74 / - :7 24 a
Applicant Contact Person:
Name
/75450
Street/Mailing Address
5-1-W-0-AJ-DL k-%JA 990eo
city State zip -
Telephone: - 4 2- 5 - -7 A0 - 5-4 0 0
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis:
FirmName
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Contact Name Telephone
a. Street address Qfknown): 2150 1 e4
50 "V
F-2 0 UA r-1 a V
(Attack a vicinity map and siteplan.)
c. Specify existing land use: Hc.,Ajs:.c--
d. Specify proposed type and size of development: i!5Ty
0 Towu deaes-
-rc,-rAL-
e. When will the project begin construction and when will it be completed? -ST,�,P--T F-A U— 2-6,P)2
f Define proposed access locations: &-ML;=_ 0 F7k 1-,--,>T 2 s�2 Tr JAW
g. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: :��TC Pt.^�,fj
Page I
2. TRIP GENERATION
a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour Trips
IN OUT
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: —
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour Trips
IN OUT
44-2-11
2-
tTS- FAN; L�p
",'Util-T-s -F"rAL.0 I
I:T� LU1* -2-:3c)
G
17g
L
— c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak!Hour Trips
IN OUT
v&T Aje; w
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted orpassby trips: Ain
Page 2
3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Prej�re and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments.
4. SITE'��CCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have �kght distance requirements at egress location been met per AASH TO requirements?
b. Intersection L�yel of Service Analysis:
• Existm Conqition.
LOS
• Year of Opening\
LOS
• Five Years Beyond
LOS
(Intersections to be evaluated
c. Describe channelization. warr.-
Delays
— Delays
of Land Use
Delays
tall be detennined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis
0 Existing Conditions
• Year of Opening
• Five Years Beyond
Change of Land Use
e. If appropriate, state stop sign and signal warrants:
Summarize local accident history:
and 95 % queuing lengths):
(Attach stripingplan.)
95%
Page 3
57.TRAFFI VOLUMES
Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, on street adjacent to and
-directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe 'te estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is
fully op and without project traffic).
en 7
c. Describe. the estimated,�DT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the
project has been fully o (with and withoutproject traffic).
P7
d. State annual background tratfic grd7th factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and a %ch supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide
the following documentation for each arterial street 0 arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -
hour trips. Other City -planned developments mumst aOls be factored into the LOS calculations.
Existine LOS:
Existing Condition:
Year of Opening LOS:
With Project:
Without Project:
Page 4
Note any assumptions/vari
to standard analysis default values and justifications:
7. MITIGATION RECOMAIENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to
project specific traffic impacts.
8. MIMMUM M[ITIGATION REQUIREMENTS.
Residential developments that generate ten PM peak -hour trips or less will be required to pay a $200 per PM
peak -hour trip fee.
PM Peak -Hour Trips x $ 200 $ C9 oer
immy Page 5
0
21601 80th Ave.
lul
Z
U,
z
0) Lit
L
00
L
x
U
EX.
C.B. � I
oba Cour� Tovmhomes
1E&=m4WA%026
1EI
NEW
C.B.
T BACK 1!-(0"
161-410" IT �
—DASHED LINES INDICATE UNDER
GROUND TANK $ DRAIN SYSTEM
ALL ON SITE IMPERVIOUS AREAS
DRAIN TO DETENTION PIPE ANY
SITE IMPROVEMENT CA'S
F—WOOD FENCE S
BETWEEN UNITS TYP 15, - 0o
SET BACK
391-611
6 o %4! a 13 E3
-4 ---- C
IT
'j --------------------- -------- -
------------ -----------------
UNIT-1 UNIT-3
Z�' 4,
116,4011
39,-(P
SITE INFORMATION
ZONE:
RM 2.4
Max. WEIGHT 30'
LOT COVERAGE
45%
TO TAL SITE AREA:
15,WO
SF. 0.34435 AG
(o UNITS W1 2 PARKING STALL5
ENCLOSED
BUILDING FOOTPRINT:
6,750
SF.
PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE
45%
Ist FLOOR AREA
6,328
5F.
2nd FLOOR AREA
(6,750
SF.
PROVIDED LANDSCAPE
5,000
SF.
-TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA
100W
SF.
K-1project-12325 Magnolia C-exrt-C-ad-Sch6dules-3255freCalcx2a
ON
NOTES:
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT (EI) 2 PER UNIT
LURALINE HL302WM, INCANDESCENT 10014, WITH MINIMUM LIGHT
SPILL. .
------------
r- -- --------
L
j
C,
- -
y; -----------
- - - - - - - - — - —
I_qr --------- ---------
(Po
1
(0)
L
LL
r:
--------
_j
UNIT-4
U. NIT��
I UNI:T-6
--------------------
--------------------------------
r
-------- tk—
Tt-7
ir
V
SITE
M20
Y
VICINITY MAP:
NTS
aP 212th St.
SW
4TE
21Coth St. E WJ4�2111,(oth
-a,..
SW
SW
215th St.
9)
220th 51
514
222nd St.
SW 99
':d
DISK/FILE No: DRAVIN BY: JOB NAME:
32SA0101 GSW Reppowl I
ar-h-tectq ps
DATE: cHEEKEDiiT F_ Magnoha Court
9*/24/02 ADS 600 Main Street, Siulite C SHEET No.
REVISION/FO No.: PROJECT No: Edmonds, WA 99020-3079
425.778.5400 FAX 'n8.3032 A1.1
All
M.T.C.
Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc.
Wc:ORT OF INPLACE DENSITIES BY NUCLEAR METHOD
BUILDING D
ly 144C
Report #D 4300
ADDRESS: Dave Gorham PROJECT: Ma
CLIENT: Nalund & Associates DATE: September 17, 2003
- gnoh-a1QQurt---------,,
9792 Edmonds Way PROJECT LOCATIONI 01-11501TAPERN. —on, 171 T-
Edmonds, WA 98020 PROJECTM -0�-BM41
PERMIT #: 03-0549 / 03-0550
WORK I LOCATION: Storm sewer road crossing (2.5'wide, 4-5'deep, 8" SDR-35 PVC) and sanitary sewer trench backfill
adjacent to manhole.
NPLACE DENSITY TEST RESULTS JASTM�13-2922&D-3017):.�:.:
TEST
MODE/
DEPTH
LOCATION
-ELEV.
DRY
DENSITY
MOIST.
%
ICOMP.
%
REQ'D
%
8
road cros§ing E lane
SG
132.3
6.9
1
96
95
2
8
road crossing W lane
SG
131.0
5.9
1
95
95
3
8
road crossing pothole at road center line
SG
A 30.7
8.8
1
95
9.5
4-
8-
road crossing pothole backfill at road.center line
SG
130.7--
6.1
1
95
95
5
8
5' E of man6ole at property entrance
SG-8"
132.3
6.9
1
96
95
TEST METHOD:
. El ASTM D-6 98/ AASHf0 T-99 0 ASTM D-1 557 / AASHTO T-1 80
*1 SAMPLE #:
031925 DESCRIPTION:-5/8" CSTC Rinker
PROCTOR VALUE.: 138.0 @ 6.6
*2 SAMPLE #:
DESCRIPTION:
PROCTOR VALUE:
,*3 SAMPLE #:
DESCRIPTION:
PROCTOR VALUE:
1*4 SAMPLE #:
DESCRIPTION:
PROCTOR VALUE:
IGAUGE STANDARD: MS-643
- DS-2422
1EQUIPMENT I.D. AND S/N (as applicable):
343013/19828
NATIVE SOILS 0
SOILS CONSISTENT WITH PROCTOR -
Yes No
E]
'IMPORTED FILLS
SOILS FOUND TO BE FIRM AND STABLE AND TO THE
BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE MEET COMPACTION -
Yes No
CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED OF RESULTS
Yes No
REMARKS: MTC was present on site as requested by the client. A sample was taken on site and
percentage will
be back calculated when laboratory
results are known.
George Sanders,
Geotechnical
REPORTED BY: Inspector
..REV'IEWED BY:.. Brian Steele; L.E.G.
DISTRIBUTION: original: Client
cc: City of Edmonds cc:
cc:
cc: cc:
All results apply only to actual localions and onsauds tested. As a mutual protection to clients. the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidermiall property oklitsms, and maborimion rorpublication ofstatcments. machisions or moracts ftm or regarding our
reports is resmod pending our written appraval.
777 Chrysler Drive Burlington, Wa. 98233 9 Phone (j60) 755-1990 0 Fax (360) 755-1980
1710 Midway Court Centralia, Wa. 98531 e Phone (360) 330-7926 * Fax (360) 330-7946
Website Address: www.mtc-inc.net
Rev. 07/01
4A
-0 0
Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc.
Proctor Report
Project: Magnolia Court
Date Sampled: 17-Sep-03
ASTM C-136
Project H: 03BM241
Sampled By: G. Sanders
Visual Identification
Sieve
Size
Percent
Specifications
Client: Natland & Assoc.
Date Tested: 18-Sep-03
CSTC
-US _..
mm.
Pawing
Max
Min
Source: Rinker
Tested By: V Duran
6.00"
150.0
100.0%
0.0%
Sampleg: 031925
4.00"
3.00"
100.0
75,0
100.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0 */'
Sample Prepared: Moist: Manual:
Dry: X
Mecbanical: X
2,50"
63.0
100.0%
0.0 */C
Test Standard:
AASHTO T 99: AASHTO T 180: Medwd
2.00"
50.0
100.0%
0.0
ASTM D 698:
ASTM D 1557: X -C
.1.73"
1.50"
45.0
37.5
100.0%
100.0%
-O.00A
0.0 O/C
Uncorrected Proctor Value
Assumed Sp. Gr. Point
Percent Dry
Mm Dry Density Optimum Moist
1.25"
31.5
100.0%
0.0%
2.75 Number
Moisture Density
138.0 lbs/f? 6.6%
1.00"
25.0
100.0%
0.0%
1
2.3% 132.2
7/8"
22.4
100.0%
0. 0 O/C
2
4.5% 136.6
Value w/ Oversize Correction Applied
3/4"
19.0
100.0%
100.0%
0.0%
3
6.5%
Max. Dry Density Optimum Moist.
5/8"
16.0
100.0%
0.0%
4
8.4% 137.0
NiA lb�fe v :-�A
1/2"
12.5
91.8%
100.0%
0.0%
3/8"
1/4"
9.5
6.3
76.2%
62.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0.0%
0.0
Moisture Density Relationship
#4
4.750
55.9%
100.0%
0.0%
140.0 -------------- ........... ......
----- - -----------
------------------------- ----------- ---------
13LO ----------- --------- ---------
-----------------
--------- ------------
'ico ----------- .......... ----------
-----------------------
------ -----------
IJ4.0 --------. __: � .....................
----------- ------------- -----------
32.0 ------ ---- ------------
".0
0% 1% 2%
3% 4% 5% 6%
7% 8% 9% 10%
Percent Moisture
Data Points
Zero Air Voids Curve ---- -- -- Curve Fit
Specs:
No Specs
Meets
Specs? Yes
ASTM D-4718, Misc. Oversize Correction Values
% Retained 3/4" 0.0%
% Retained Corrected
Optimum % Retained
Corrected Optimum
%Gravel: 44. 1 %
D(1o):
3/4" Sicve Density
Moisture 3/4" Sieve
Density Moisture
%
Sand:
D,N)I--
5% 139.4
6.3% 20%
143.7 5.4%
% Silt&Clav:
Dt6l)):
10% 140.8
6.0% 25%
145.2 5.1%
cc:
LL n/a
15% 142.2
5.7% 30%
146.7 4.9%
C11:
PL n/a
FM:
PL ala
Engineering & Technu�nl Ser,. PS. 1996.98
Comments:
Reviewed C; -
by:
AH "ah" V* 0* to OMW Immim and Materials logo& As a mutud PmuCtion to clients. dw public and oursdvm all reports = ixtbaduad as the confidenfial property oftlicats, and authorization rm pahtkorioa
of statearem% conclusions of cx1racts finar or regarding our reports is rcxrvW pending our written approval.
777 Chrysler Drive 9 Burlington, WA 98233 Phone (360) 755-1990 e Fax (360) 755-1980
1710 Midway Court 9 Centralia, WA 98531 Phone (360) 330-7926 9 Fax (360) 330-7946
Website Address: www.mtc-inc.net
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information'shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of �Eclmoncls does not war'rant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(�-). Any person or entity -requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
tFe -map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may* not exist and may
or'may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
emp]-o-yee-s o-r officers S)h-all be liab-le for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
APPLICATION
for
The City of Edmonds SME SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS E)
OV,rN-ER ... I.q. ... 12'.. 7'—ix�Z ............ ...................
..........
ADDRESS.......... ...................... ........... ...........
�FZI C��
EASEMENT No . ............. . ...........................
A,
D97
CONTRACTOR ....... ....... ............................ - PERMIT No . . ......
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .................. : ........................... BL0CK No . ............................................
NAMEOF ADDITION .........................................................................................................................................
RECEIVED
1914
....... ..........
e,5 jq
7 +
3 i0o, oi-- L-1
0 F :5
ro
iz
Approved:
DATE................................................ By ......................................................................
APPLICATION
Tke City of Edmonds...,,,-.. for
EASEMENT NO - -----------------_- ......................
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION F� REPAIRS LID NO.
..................
E:: �7, A, � S_rT__:t5
........ ---------------------------------------------- RMI - ---------------
0 WNER -------------- ................................ ............... T NO --
---BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------
.... ............ .. � .. ......
ADDRESS . .......... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . .............. —:4 ............ ___
DITION........ -------------------------- ------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
F'- 7T.
Approved:
DATE --------- By ....... ----- el& ------------
J!,
. GoE OND S-:` --i-41DE AMER` BER.' MfT.�'.�:'
: ii D, M 7
t
'DEPART-M&lr-
�:WAT
R,
8R
0_v
-R
:Rj�'FO�K: 'co�eri;g �a_ny.!-�ort`i6�--_-�.i, � h+
7 1��
Insppjn�ign :wdl+'.b�` i3r'�vlcJ4 Z41nin, i�l 66u-rs* aft6r'�'reqliqt holiday- t6spect-ion-s").,."
ia
tLr_;
6
OF -Avenuo.-rilps,
,CONSTRu N.; I I -,
3MOCAUON 150T�. -�+�--:80th
.. ..... ......... ................................... .................................. ... .
........................
7
'00; f
S 6 6.� Rt �34; eet�7 f
N+.'+* .................. .......................... ..................... ......
? .......... ................................................... .. ........
7z.
j 4
4V81 j f, 66 t 0 f s " �. i �/ 1. ,
2 Wl 2_�+-_JIE, I
....................................................... ........................................................................
.............. ...... ..............
R"B. RTHUR, AN D
W.-NER-AND7, A
................... . UILDER .............. ..............
7- ....... �.O - RSb
E N
.............. . . .. .......
................. ........... ...........................
0 la.Ve:,
�T-4, S
.......................... ............. ................ ................ .................................................. 7�7' 7 1
7
2 g j r 4 �l q-i ...... DP, 'nit
..................... . ...... z ....... 19:..: f,� pa!k::ari�/or-*conn tion- of�a.:s
446_ _v.e'sa ary,,- er.',
monds.4rdinafices.
D.-TO: THE. . L
41"WCA LLE
-FOL OWING:
mky+ obta!�i.-,a,.Rempt Jo-'constrLicU. se%'er fnilde�, property iihe.'_kljc�nsed Side Sewer., Contractoj��must - be- emplo - y I edllo'�co . nat , Fu6c
_7��MZ16�s6ver.`Jh:sire�t &�ea. D6not-cover.-any portion of'sewer befo�re it'fia�.be&i-inis '_ ted.,::'%*
Pee
the.pit� Engineer's office'
rlgfiC--of41iy, i+equires Invasl6ri +.6f+ r�ght -oL-,Wa.Y'Permit7obt&ln&blc
'-'�:��do'n rega�ding.+'Ordinan��rli.16:050."����k'�g+
ulati6 goyernlng�'slde -sewers when+ you g
y grade�t6f- W19-
12,0/0 No - ,
'tis.:in m�'e
-�i;dti,,prope'rt Aln�;!��njnimujn;
e, and 12-Anch�s;iA'
to,oF]g!p��l�9c;n,�i,�ib'n'.'---,C�nI,�ctors!jshELil-be,'respoi Ab- lnnproper'�
co,
e 6r rk.;on th�-. ixi�An7seN�er� aPpii�te—p-lances'-except to in'
0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Y.. !+. 2.
E ate...
- . B ......
D + -Date
.......... ...... .................
..... . ........................
'D
W!r
2i
---------- ............... ........... ------- .............
A A
.. zi
�'Z� .......................... ---------------------- ......
----------------- ........
........................ .......
BOTIV_,Rermit, 6 -.Si*-,"
pe�S�.-AIUST.B "; ru n7.
gned�By-Owhei-.,,tdf-�Firm.
U.
�_a-EdmiJnd�-
3-,DatedjJiis:--
"Felephoin
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S,
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
ewer:,;
COORDINATE IRR16ATION 5)"5TEM INITH
FENOIN6 BETNEEN UNIT5 - TYPICAL
P.O.G. AT 5/4" IRRIOATION NATER METER
5EE GIVIL DRAININ65
� 15.0 �
� q.0 �
15
15
'15
'15
15
5EE ARGHITF-GTURAL PRANINC-75
FOR SITE FENCING, NALL5, BUILDIN&
LAYOUT AND LOCATION, CURBING,
516NA6E, AND LIGHTING.
2. 5EE ARCHITEGTURAL PRANIN65
FOR FINIA117 -.GONTROLLER LOGATION.
5. SEE ELE6TR16AL DRANIN65 OF
6ONTROLLER PONER 5OURGE.
4. SEE GIVIL DRANING5 FOR GRADING/
5POT ELEVATION, AND CONTOUR
LINES.
5. 5EE 5HEET L-2 FOR IRRI&ATION
SCHEDULE AND DETAILS.
AMS
Landscape Architecture
1405 Northeast Katsura Street
Issaquah, Washington 98029
Voice 245-681-6458
Fox 425-837-36el
STATE OF
WASHINGTON
REGISTERED
LANDSCAPE ARC ITECT
ART-HX M—. SEIDEL
CERTIFICATE NO. 706
r
r
00
N
x
4
LL
0
0
Mr
V)
CIS
r*_
111t:
Lo
Cm
NT
CID
too
C
0
E
v
LU
C)
Mu'SIMS.
MARK DESCRIP7.10N DATE BY
ISSU. FOR PERMIT 9/12/02 AMS
REVISION -1 12/16/02 AMS
SHEET TME:
LAND6(;AFl-.-
IRRIGAT10N RECEIVED
Fl.AN DEC 2 3 2002
PERMIT COUNTER
SCAM: DRAWN BY-
111:1101-011 1 AMS
DAXE: CHECKED BY:
09/12/2002 AMS
PROJECT NO.: I FILE NAME:
S.HEETNO.:
IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION
NTS
PAVING FINISH SURFACE
COMFAOT SUB GRADE
SPECIFIED BACKFILL
FINISH GRADE OR —
TOP OF MULCH LAYER
TOF9OIL
FV6 LATERAL LINE
F`V0 SCHEDULE 40
5LEEVIN6 FOR MAINLINE
PVC SCHEDULE 40
9LEEVIN6 FOR CONTROL
NIRIN6.
FNIC, 'l--iAINLINE
CONTROL NIRIN6
SLEE\/IN(7 AND TRENCHING
NTS
5LEEVINC7
VALVE BOX
CSALVANIZE MAINLINE FROM
NATER SUPPLY
61 OBE SHUT -Orr VALVE
FV6 MAINLINE
FVC UNION
FINISH GRADE OR
Top OF MULCH LAYER
PVC MAINLINE
DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLY
,JUMBO VALVE BOX
TOP501L
PVC MAINLINr- TO
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
VALVE Box EXTENSIONS
FEA GRAVEL DRAIN
;z
7:
0
SOLID FVC CAP TYPICAL
DO NOT GLUE - FAINT BLUE
TEMPORARY
FINISH GRADE OR TOP OF MULCH LAYER
FAVIN6 - FINISH SURFACE
COMPACT SUB GRADE
TOPSOIL
PVC, SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVE TYPICAL
TEMPORARY
SPECIFIED BACKFILL
clo DEGREE ELL - TYPICAL
UNDISTURBED NATIVESOIL
FVC. SCHEDULE 40SLEEVE
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
NTS
<
<
:r <
0 -3
m 7-
T
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
NT5
5FRAY HEAD
BUILDING HALL
AUTOMATIC IRR16ATION
CONTROLLER - NALL MOUNT
120 V FOkNER5OURCE BY OTHERS
CONDUIT NALL STRAP - TYPICAL
FV0 CONDUIT FOR CONTROLLER NIRES
51ZE AS REOUIRED - FAINT TO MATCH
VIAL.1- COLOR
FINISH SURFACE OR FINISH GRADE
OUTSIDE BUILDING
FINISH 5URrACE
PVC SNEEP ELL CONDUIT - SIZE AS
REOUIRED - TO LANDSCAPE AREA
FIN15H GRAVI!=- OR
TOP OF MULOH LAYEF,
FINISH5URFACE
TOP90IL
POP-UP 5FRAY HEAP
MARLEX FITTN&
6FIRAL 13ARE3 FITTIN6
TYPIOAL
FV0 Sc,HEDUJ_E 40 FIT7149
SKNry FIFL= (Ib" MAX)
PVC, LATERAL LINE
FIN15H GRADE OR
TOP Or MULCH LAYER
24" LOOP Or EXCESS NIRE
TYPICAL
KATER TI&HT!5PLICE CONNECTOR
TYFICAL
VALVE BOX
TOPSOIL
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
PVC SCHEDULE 50 T.O.E. NIPPLE
PVC SX5 CIO DEGREES
PVC MAINLINE NIPPLE
CONTROL NIRE
TYPICAL
PVC SCHEDULE 40 FITTIN6
PVC MAINLINE
PEA GRAVEL. DRAIN
PVC LATERAL LINE
<
< U
<
<
<
N IL
0
QUIGK COUPLING VALVE
N f5-
IRR16ATION S6HEDULE
FINISH GRADE OR
TOP Or MULCH LAYER
VALVE E30X
2" MAX. CLEAR
FINISH SURFACE
TOPSOIL
OUICK COUPLING VALVE
PEA GRAVEL DRAIN
GALVANIZE NIPPLES
PVC SCHEDULE 40 FITTIN6
CONTROL NIRES
&ALVANIZESTREET ELL (5 TOTAL)
PVC MAINLINE
5YMBOL
0150RIPTION
F.5.1.
RAPIU5
G.F.M.
0 15
RAINBIRD 006-5AM-M-151', 6" FOP -UP 5FRAY
50
15,
a. -TO
15
RAINBIRV IbOb-5AM-Ff;L5-15H, 6" POP-UP 5FRAY
30
15,
1.65
L 15
RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-FRS-150, 6" FOP-UP!5FRAY
30
15,
0.13
15
RAIN131RD I5Ob-5AM-PR5-I5\/AN, 6' FOP -UP 5FRAY
50
15,
1.85
0 1.2
RAINBIRD 1506-5AM-FRS-12F, 6" FOF-UF5FRAY
50
12,
2.60
12
RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-M-12H, 611 POF-UP 5FRAY
50
12,
1.50
L 12
RAINBIRD lbob-5AM-M-120, b" POP-UP 5FRAY
50
12'
0.65
12
RAINBIRD Ibob-5AM-FR5-I2\/AN, b- POP-UP 5FRAY
50
12'
1.30
0 a
RAINBIRD 1806-SAM-FIR5-61', 6" FOP -UP 5FRAY
50
1.05
e)
RAINBIRD IbOb-5AM-FR5-aH, 6" POP-UP 5FRAy
30
L31
052
RAINBIRD 1506-5AM-M-80, 6" FOF-UP 5FRAY
30
bl
0.26
RAINBIRP 1606-5AM-PIP-6-WAN, 6" POF-UP5FRAY
30
61
1.15
El 55T RAINBIRD 1806-5AM-FR5-1555T, 6' FOP-UF5FRAY 150 1 4'x5O' 1 1.21
RAINBIRD 100-FE5, V REMOTE CONTROL \IALVE
REMOTE CONTROL \/ALVE OALL-OUT
CONTROLLER 5TATION NUMBER
VALVE 51ZE
GALLON5 PER MINUTE
P4,oq
rEErso 5/4" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE A55EMBLY
IV
CONTROLLER, K&LL MOUNT OUTSIDE BUILVIN6
RAINBIRD ESP-66LX, AUTOMATIC,
5EE ARCHITECTURAL DRMIN65
RAINBIRD 55Rr,, 5/4' WICK C.OUFLINC7 VALVE
'ED
CLASS 200 FVC,, MAINLINE -51ZE AS NOI
- 5IZE A5 NOTED
CLA55 200 FVC, LATERAL LINE
------ 5CHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVING MINIMUM TYlICE!5IZE OF INTERIOR FIFE
AMS
Landscape Architecture
1405 Northeast Katsure Street
Issaquah, Washington 98029
Volas 245-681-6458
Fax 425-837-3661 STATE OF
WASHINGTON
REGISTERED
IDSCAPE ARC ITE
T U M S I
LANDSCAPE ARC ITECT
ARTHU M. SEIDEL
CERTIFICATE NO. 706
rja
(114
0
00
441
Tj_
1-4
5
C4
cl
LL
LO
Ui
C4
0
00
0)
4
0
E
100
LU
"lop
X
C
C)
(D
6
tH
I
01111111111111
!11111111111111
1'11111111
111111111111
..........
REVISION&
MARK DESCRIMON
DATE BY
165U. FOR MRMIT 9/12/02 AMS
REVISION -1 12/16/02 AMS
RFECEIVEED
DEC 2 3 2002
PERMIT COUKER
SHEET TITLE:
LANDSCAFF.
IWIGATION
AND DETAILS
SCALE:
DRAVvN BY:
1110101-011
AMS
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
09/12/2002
AMS
P.ROJECT NO.:
FILE NAME -
SHEET NO.:
-2
L
NTS
NT5
Cm
C*
0
00
*0
A I A I iz-- 1-7 �� fn
_T r 11
LAT'N"DS CAPE PLAN.,-,TING PLAN
111=10' - 0"
T A
1--d-FINDSCAPE NOTES:
1. SEE ARGHITF-GTURAL PRANINC-75
FOR 51TE FENCING, VIALL5, BUILDINO
LAYOUT AND LOCATION, CURBIN6,
516NA6E, AND L16HTIN6.
2. SEE GIVIL PRANIN65 FOR 6RADIN6,
SPOT ELEVATION, AND CONTOUR
LINES.
4 V�F E3. ALL TREES TO BE A MINIMUM OF 41
FROM ANY PAVINO OR CURBING.
4. STREET TREES TO BE PLANTED
OE3 NITHIN 41 OF PROPERTY LINE.
TREES AND LAROE 5HRUB5 TO BE
PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 5FROM
ANY NATER/5ENER LINE AND 41
Fa:_ FROM FIRE HYDRANT5.
ALL LAND50APE AREA5 NILL
RECEIVE A 2" LAYER OF MEDIUM-
F I NE HOOD- MULC.,H.
1. 5EE 5HEET L-4 FOR PLANT
MATERIAL 56HEOULE AND DETAIL5.
PLANT GUANTITIE5 SHOViN ON
PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE ARE
FOR CITY INFORMATION
4 NF GONTRAGTOR\R 15 RESPONSIBLE
FOR PLANT GUANTITIES A5
SHONN E3)"' SYME30L ON PRANIN6.
APPRVED By PLANNI
AMS
Landscape Architecture
1405 Northeast Katsura Street
Issaquah, Washington 98029
Voice 245-681-6468
Fax 426-8374681
STATE OF
WASHINGTON
REGISTERED
LANDSCAPE AR9IITECT
C
ARTHX M. SEIDEL
CERTIFICATE NO. 706
rl
M_-
A
11
0
0
Itr
U)
Ld
Cm
IRT
0)
C?
0
00
0
E
m
w
0
S
z
so
fill
11 Hill
REVISIONS:
MARK DESCRIMON DATE BY
ISSU. FOR KRMIT 9/12102 AM$
MVISION -1 12/16/02 AMS
SHEETUTLE:
LANDSCAFF.
FLANTINGRECEIVED
10LAN DEC 2 3 2002
PERMIT COUNTER
SCALE: DRAWN BY:
1113101-011 AMS
DATE: CHECKED BY.
09/12/2002 AMS
PROJECT NO.: FILE NAME:
SHEETNO.:
L-3
.1
NOTE5-- PLANT OROUNDCOVER HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLOIN
POSITIVE DRAINAGE AKAY FROM ROOTBALL.
6ROUNIXWER FLANTIN&
NT5
x 07
,
+ T
X velmW04,
X
-A
%Illlt
X 5FAGII�
NOTE: SPACING TO BE TRIANGLE PER DISTANCE
SHONN ON PLANT SCHEDULE
SPACING APPLIES TO ALL GROUNDCOVER5
AND FORMAL SHRUB ROY4 FLACEMENT.
T'�PIOAL PLANT 5PACINC7
NT5
GROUNI)GOVER
NO MULCH AROUND PLANT 5TEM
BACKFILL PIT NITH 50%
TOP501L AND 50% NATIVE
SOIL. ADD SPECIFIED
AMMENDMENT5 AND
FERTILIZER TO MIX,
2" SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER
5FECIMED PLANT TABLET$
SCARIrY ROOTBALL ON
CONTAINER MATERIAL.
MULCH LAYER
E06E OF BED
EDGE Or FAVIN6
.CA I F11- IN&WV I UMI-
DIAMETER
NOTES: PLANT TREES H16H ENOUGH TO A�,OIN
0
F051TIVE DRAINAGE MAY FRO ROOTBALL.
ROUGHEN ALL SURFACES OF FIT.
LOCATE ALL STAKES OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALL.
OECIOUQU15 TREE PLANTIN6 AND 5TAKIN6
NT5
lw
.e-?% I rim- r-&wc-� I=^"
DIAMETER
NOTES: PLANT SHRUB HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLON
POSITIVE DRAINAGE AKAY FROM ROOTBALL,
ROUGHEN ALL SURFACES Or PIT,
5HRUE3 PLANTIN(7
Nit)
PREVALINC, Y41NO
ROOTBALL
TIRME TRUNK
STAKE - TYPICAL
PLAN VIEN
'ME - PRUNE AS DIRECTED
BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
20 DIAMETER TREATED
Lov&Erol E STAKE (2 TOTAL)
TREE MAP
ATTACH TO TREE USING
'CHAINLOCK'GUY`INr7
INRAF AND PROTECT TREE
12" DIAMETER No MULCH RIN(9
REMOVE BURLAP AND/OR
INIRE BASKETS. FROM THE
TOP 113 OF ROOT BALL.
2" SPECIFIED MULCH LAYER
WECIFIED PLANT TABLETS
3ACKFILL FIT NITH 50%
rOF5OII- AND 50% NATIVE
�011-. ADD 5FECIrIEr2
WMPNOMENT5 AND
�ERTILIZER TO MIX.
IND15TURBED NATIVE SOIL
SHRUB - PRUNE AS DIRECTED
BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
611 DIAK�TER NO MULCH RIN&
BACKFILL PIT Y41TH 50%
TOF501L AND 50% NATIVE
501L. A012 SPECIFIED
AMMENOMENT5 AND
FERTILIZER To Mix.
2" 5PECIFIE-12 MULCH LAYER
SPECIFIED PLANT TABLETS
SCARIFY ROOTBALL ON
CONTAINER MATERIAL.
REMOVE TOP I/B OF
BURLAP ON BW MATERIAL
PLANT MATERIAL 5GHEPULE
SYME30L BOTANICAL- NAME / COMMON NAME 51ZE NOTES OUANTITY
16 ACER RUBRUM 'BONHALL' / BONHALL MAPLE
1-3/4" CAL. 60, MATCHED FORM 4
IO'HT. MIN. 5TREET TREE
BRANCHED AT (51
9 5TENARTIA KOREANA / KOREAN5TENARTIA 6' HT. 5M FULL $ BU5HY,
LON BRANCHED
5TYRAX JAPONICU5 / JAPANE5E5NONDROP TREE V HT. B$B, FULL i BU5HY,
0 LON BRANCHED
SHRUE35
Do 0 BER617-NIA CRA551FOLIA / NINTER-BLOOMIN(5 BER(5ENIA I CAL. FULL $ BU5HY, 21-611 O.C.
65 0 CAMELLIA 5A5ANQUA 'CLEOFATRAI / No COMMON NAME 161-2111 HT. FULL $ SU5HY (FINK) 12
oy 0 CAMELLIA 5A5ANOUA 'YULETIDE'/ NO COMMON NAME 10"-2111 HT. FULL s BU:5HY (RED) 3
PM 0 FUCH51A MArvELLANICA / NO COMMON NAME 3
18"-21" HT. FULL4 BUSHY, 41-01, O.C. I
LF 0 LEUCOTHOE FONTANE51ANA 'RAINBON' / RAINBoN DROOPINry LEUCOTI-oEI,5fl-2111 HT. FULL s BU5HY, 4'-Olf o.C. 25
No 0 NANDINA DOME5TICA lCOMPACTAl / COMPACT HEAVENLY BAMBOO 2111-2411 HT. FULL 4 SU5HY, 5'-o" o.c., .93
OB 05MANTHU5 BURKNOOoll / No COMMON NAME 21"-24" HT. FULL s BU5HY, 4'-0;: o.C. 12
.5R 5ARCOCOGGA RU5GIFOLIA / No COMMON NAME 1611-2111 HT. FULL s BU!5HY, 4'-011 o.C. 15
\10 0 VIBURNUM DAVIE)II / r?AVjr?jjl--vjBURNU . VI 2111-24" HT. FULL $ BU5HY, 4'-&' o-.��-. 24
NF 0 NE16ELA FLORIDA / NE16ELA 21"-24"HT. FULL $ BU5HY, 61-oll o.C. 16
FERRENIAL5 / 6RA55E5
HSO 0 HEMEROGALL15 STELLA 01 ORO' / 5TELLA 01 ORO DAYLILY I (5AL. PULL s BU5HY, 21-011 O.C.
H5 0 H05TA 51EBOLr?IANA / PLANTAIN LILY 14
1!5 0 IR15 51BIRIGA / No COMMON NAME I 6AL. PULL $ BU5HY, 21-61, O.C. 12
1 CAL. FULL $ SU5HY, 21-011 o.o. 46
6ROUNDcovER
6AULTHERIA PROGUMBEN5 / NINTER6REEN 4" POT 24,10.0.
A5 RE01v
LYSIMAGHIA NUMMULARIA / MONEYNORT
411 POT 241, O.C. A5 REolv
VINCA MINOR / ONARF FERINNKLE 4" POT 241, A5 REalv
A M 8
Landscape Architecture
1405 Northeast Kst$ura Street
Issaquah, Washington 98029
Voice 24r)-6814458
Fax 42"37-3661
STATE OF
WASHINGTON
REGISTERED
LANDSCAPE ARC ITECT
A4 AMSEIDEL
CERTIFICATE NO, 706
r
Cm
LL
0
0
IV
04
IV
0
E
v
Ul
0%
4)
m
a
REVISIONS:
MARK DESCRimoN DATE BY
ISSU- FOR FF-RlIT 9/12/02 AMS
RF-VISION -1 12116102 AMS
RECEIVED
DEC 2 3 2002
PERMIT COUNTER
77ET TITLE:
LANDSCAFF.
Fl-ANTING
SCHMOULF.
AND OF —TAILS
SCALE: DRAWN BY:
I AMS
DATE; CHECKED BY.-
09/12/2002 1 AMS
PRO LICT NO.:
9 1 FILE NAME:
SHEET NO.:
L-4
I
4 i
'166
fy
I
m
...... ......
5 t". A i �X,
1-11M., fN VT 1PIN, ;Fl"l�V-.'!."'.,,��.",,�P.P�*,�""'��.71���.'�"���,, 4, A 9 14
iP 1A Ne Ioj
! T1, A -A 1_$l � wm?�
MOW
K., "i
-Aft V I
It V
N 0,
It.
t%v, s
w I �1� %��. r . - , k
.-Now';
`V
A*
i Ali
J;:
V, Uf
4
17: �i
"� rk, j;,
R
q
if
V.- I. "V;'� -jfj4- t
I , , i
T"I , , ;, " �% I. . __, 11". 1 _ , - 0 1 . , ,, - I , ;, , 1 - " z, ; -F
`0 NZ QUtW2
k
'oEv" 5`44E. -ASE
'40 k-
T
A .
t, 1z
W
Y
3
111K.
W3 34
, tj,
....... ...... W
T
40.0'1 '1 W." 1 .1.
.. QJ1
I-T "it"
4�7;11
P
T
z-vi
.46 t
U
JI,
AW
Y, 'R
0
'X.
'k
0,
N� oAqqR,%T41 g
Im-y 7i
t:
;0�
4.
x �vi
qn
tko
1"- 4, ;46 "M
-Ijj
gi
L"10 'i�'% in "t",
N�
!If
If. .I I
'SiP R"Ut
T"I"k 'Jil ji;t,
zy
Z_:
A17_T414;144 _4'1�,:t
-i W, 11.1'r" 41�
-10
B
6
"qtry Air
v --d wi, f." '�;,i t
r, 31,4
"mw PROMOXi
Q_
AT
Ik
�UR
_4
'R. 1--T .14,
_,i�;�AJ 16
tWj:
TA
IV
6
E E�'.,Ii,`-' OTE:�:�5
`X " H "0, J N"
:oj i
1� -.1 1 1� ,
TF
0! �`A�, P
'r
It.
g
mw-%
IA 0_., wr - - -I- , I , .
p.:- 't:, I " V
A
Gf. d (pil
m
I �, �* ` IV,
�A
IA H;
4
-,v' Lit
ml,
R,
a TE
4`E,1,E:G E fr
r4g
'YAW
14
, Irt a
'61M iI'.
ek:,
W.,
K. j I
t EX. wAtm m4W dh a9wd'vi 4.?1. 4� -, 1 , , _ 0,
" 17, - ..(k I
F 41 ol-,
x
A A:
g. yv,
Py
v
IV
SEE
j
A,
FOR UTI -ITY ACCES
T.
S D
mom
ALSO So OF SI T
:,-'m SY,4,4 "v,
01
il tit
Jtj
LOONTR4
r
OTOR to
4A.
_VAWod 'L-'-'
U
'T`�NAJL :TOP
x 4 OA*m (70 RAUgEml. 4 -W
AMM-em. *
Y, 1 01. 5 10 EG 100.2 9"AWMAWMAPM, AN
OM5, 102.1 00.5 0. 5 E G 9 9.20
1 Q b
V A0,40
WJ
FtNtE PO':
4;
ViPl� -'Ioill 7.
A!"
7,
A
ruff
_14
IaW
CLO*O o" AW #bNALL
T
4,"
V�,
I w - ' * _,' _ ;�`
�)v 4"A.
d
1WUfiEAr.W1.4MpAro#A
FW. MOM 11wq - - , - - � i.1 V� i ., ..--! f
LAW
A
i. ew
mite, I
L 'A
A�-
�.,,t7 R
11" COMM -�S
.9 q%
'Jim liwr tostcmyolr,
*10 It
Pv
T. gri
MOM Mt
M MWA,
MW
WAW?
Ag
!;. jr!V�W Ld
F dR 'I k,3*. 5
IST
fr, mr pws�x illow oven ArA#WM Now,
R V -'S E
CIA"
A jr
G E 401.1'FOR S LINE
few gx.W.A(. P IN& mr&4
4, A
--AP" !'f L I fE`
(D
IN
t rppApwwvm~ 4-A ##j%At ANOW
T`� 1. 1� I
07*.. ON ce, x
n
n
rE.-SEWIT TER& ANDISIDE SEWM 9 ON Pffll
A,
-6
Ty
'$HA U. BE W IN TA 1P.
jj �.i W'
'4
SEE,
12l �4F PROM 0 .-M
. .11" . , , 41 '1
Q, UNIT 2 IT-3
bN
4,E A GH S N 1 2
yt�:
;if, �,,L4 P
M E 'T E R Ft 0 t.3 __'_U Q
X-
E V
Mii
1�z
m
T"
F-17
tiv
Y.
ki.
4 "o"11
X
A
"N.
0"
i 11, - REN L
-1h 7; "T *1 - :J9 I; 'I,, . 11 1 1 P., vkl 'A'i N. :ON&%�i�T- H.-
n
X r)
k
. . ........
VPI I J 1 17,111 v I %.I
ap.
�u N
. ......... . ......
k
TE DW- M."Al -ENTR AW
Y'
-A, iT.,
. ............
All.
Ica,
At-,:
V .6 3RADE
SL
E R-
V
�T . � 11 A.b,. j .'4
-f ;
T
.1, 0
- W1.
P.
V, -f,4� c 7,1. q,;"
7.. .1
E R H
SE, �TIITUN_F-
EL
PN-", V "
7%,
0 Vl_:,�
01
4!i 'it
U_
0 0A T'O
ym
;k 01
" Fr-N
4
17
;p-
2T.
Ms.;
I, tf.. 04. 00
4.1i
It_
U.
Mii T E, R
U�j I
Y
4 J: T I W E
ux, N I
�UN
t. 4
�g
20",Y
Y
4.4 �Iib L U`
A2 W
A I:
p, 4'.
&6N &*,4!'
A
i� .3-
J,.
It , , , " 0,070 A
. , I _. 1 .1 , - IstoO, c )"
"7, - , " ,,r , I . "' ' L -t ' ' "'
AI.
'Allf. I.
..... . . . . . . . r4p
te .0 " f
3 f-P
99.25
A I., " .. "'i. I . ,. � -z . - �,
M.15 A
7
4i
N
kI
si
L
"Ai v -4- 4/ 14,
14/
'tit I ". .. I Q ADF4"
%
fill
I ... ............... . ...............
v,
"Ile + IV
UNII 1 9ACK
T, "I't.
% A El vt IL
. ."I?. :;, 't F
-1, �W lo t� I ,
4,
v
7
V L
X
A w
7f z
v,
0 0 j
U"* q U
.7/1
it, t!f
b
tj L) EG 9 9. 3 0
alC E(3 100.1
tt
Him,
2,
POOPERTY U
j
Z -A
........... . ............ . .....
UA W., I
-Apo
x1or UJ
;zK;k.. 4, 1:
A--
.. ......... tni:�',
T-1 07. y
a"i 'I , , " I , - , , -1 1 - ��, I I H L ' r I I ] �: 4 - .. fl,
ff�l 1:1. 14 ,
AID A
Tj 0 R,'�.
N
D
p
suILD
..........
. .. . ...... . ............
t 7-7 jy%
ti
7'
7 V�'� III`�
17 W,I ,
%
-1-,37 715 R
+ 21,75 5
ARTURM.
I GNP 44A P
IA
14'� -7,
60
A I .1�
t., .7,:1 9 111,, Q3
.,)'j:. 1120
'T, W AL .0 'A '%W,. t).; k.
, i-!, "', - �V. "q!
5.1 v
7 ti III JIK
i,:- m 1, R M
21601 90M W,
0 do -.7 Z.
,
;t VELOPMENU
CITY -OF EDMONDS
q ?�i J.,
AT -
K."
kppp
P
, b. �3
4� 'I . " , 1. . . . . I . . Pf
k:�, AP i I. p.
OVEVASWTED
NG E
- �E
PM 0 WW98
ON&
E R T!' ii%`14
Al E' HI H 1 - Z I
X
s
0
a
5k
_T
ip V
"s, i,
N.
&
b y"'��j t V':
t U
b
ERING
j
4f:
U q
d�
04,
t
6
. ... .. slit,
"Not
X,.
D Z4)
fv,4^ Nv
4
Vt, k?
V
�'.:v "j?
A
.3
jl�
." It
Al I mr,
'A
'q
gj
�itkl . . "R
;t 'y
�S-
�tg
PR
j P
'pig
ft
1, 1IN'
z
ki
A
AX11 19
p if
Ali
4
U
A.
No b 4". 1
I o
- ; ",
V u1jwz. A 4
?
A- .,i, i�.� Ii%f4
e SWIrM od&m Till -A
T
IA u
fag
w,� q�i
it
4
AS
STSW
NE 114 OF -SECTION 30p TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EISTj WM.
z Cq
_3 EX. SSMH OSS STA 2+74
RIM 106.03 IE 98.05
z C6
:;z CY)
11 W GRADE FROM BLDGS TO VALLEY TO BACK OF SM AS SHOWN
w 04 z 0 to C14
N 0 N tq 0
w F- LO
z 00 00
_j
0 _j
00 w - 0 Ld
?1m= 1 5.70 Z w �<_ w
.E.=1 0.18 < 0 0 w m w
M >� w 1-1 _j
< CL 0
CE3#10(IL) SEE TABLE-SHT 1/4
w
JOIN 2' OF 24" PIPE STUB T -�B Z V) 0 C) �:th
> 0 w Z - m Cj ON 0 F-
w 1-- < 0 W C) Z
2 w Z z C)
7i fq Ld 11
10 U) L) w < Ad D
=� m 1-- w
_%A10 U_ �Oww
D 1111i I
> CB#9(11-48") Uj o < d (n af >
B co 0 m �9: x z <
w LO w 0 :j IL
a_ :E m I_ >- W (0 0 0� to to LO _j
FOR UTI-ITY �c ACCES SEE LL w W W:*C'4 0
119001 > 0 - Z
Ill ALSO So. SIDE OF SIT 0 w < 5- m ad w Qf LO (0 LLJ �- F-
z w ca w M 0 V) w IL <
z 0 0 0) 0 0 C) U) w 10-
jo 3: a- -q- - (j W 11 U) 0 LC-) ll-_ wo,- m
EG 02.1 9.20 w . Z w U) .
1�105JK1.04.0 4. 102.0 1 0210 EG 101.5 EG Ln X ILD (n < Q_w
0485 EG J 'CO -
S� L -0 _j
02
ET L TOP LLJ X 0 7 Z 00 0 D
0.5.3 Lqw. saililill z Ill w + (0 1 zri- L) Ir 0
POST T1w . . Ld
2. jq .. .1 L, - . 1 0 z r1i 'ED It 0 m < a-
Z.A;, f p Ill, k 0 + -
x
I
?IM
.E.=1
90
Ll EG 9.21
R A E
STE C T
Will MK
I C
51 BA K
TI LI Ty
E GRAD D
PER Cl Y S1D.
R:
li(IZ93 1
Q0
RIM=10 .97;
2 'S
0 EX. C HE RE
F
E
>
<
00
006
1_1_ 0
0-
zw
_j 0
of
1_ x
01w
EL 105
EL 104
EL 102
EL 10%
+00
m
in St.
212th S
. SW
TE
216th St. Sj -C216th
218th S
$t. SW
. SW
ai
2 20th S
�. SW
<
_;
<
I
=1222nd
S
S 9
00
LL w
Ld
00 0 0 W w m 0 U_ ry 0
V) w 3. LLJ t,� w
+ w
-------- to + '\ + C� w 3: w LO y 0
F /* M V., 0
F 3* 'p &- , -k t 0 U) W W (n OZ)
F-1 `0,1 L6
P
-4 TS ed EL 10� V) w in +
+ 0 alow
D ---411 FVC FOR DOWNS w w Ld V) Uj + V�CfiV�TY-MAP
JOIN FG ALL SIL, ES n w 0 5 ALL UNITS
NOTE Ed102.0_,,'0' T COMP. DEPTH CL. B ASPHALI m 1ST wFLf 103. x
3" COMP. DEPTH ATI + w
.4 PT FROM* HERE& E. SIll OF LOGS. U)
1p I - - - GAR=
9 f 6w COMP DEPTH GRAVEL BOR[l L0 W 103�C
LOG 100.
00
K -EX. FENCE z 0.31% SP-OPE TO CB#8
4 14VnMu 1- 0 3N A PAINT IST FLF4=103.5 li I Z RIM
-0 li Z
z Z)
Ltc I Il 0 m
-41 Ij 0,
ir UNff-I U.ISM-2 EL 10.2
,--VALLEY 1111N�-102.9; SLOPE NORTH TO 101-11 AT CORNER I UTILITY/ACCESS ESM"T. M �
_j
M
TO E. PROPERTY LINE 00 _j
1k * -\I.- -1 A 1_�
_ __ _I 3.
�O q F=103.0 G l
W x
............ .......... w
LO LO 0) 01
P6 4'g4' QQNQ- DIAUnmn 6 6 0 0 L iFG1_END,0'3
CENTERED ON MAIN ENT < < < < <
F- F-
CANOPY I V) In V) (n Ell "llill drHffiHPL(.1S
3.0' ROCKERY >w� z EL 10(
""--ICB#6 11-48") 44 . I'll 5 U) V) U) (n
in (n V) (n U) (n
EVSqGAM 71ME
16m WrR MAIN Ill V ELEV 99.3T & TOP 100.82 ON P 0 �Ill L1
I W WTR MAIN ID ELEV 99.11 & TOP 100.66 OVE OUTLET PI
I ill
0 1 =__ I I - r 0 j DEaDUOUS 7REE, &WSWIllillill
< �7. C.O. SS STA1+20 Ej� -F lt�
Gl F=103.0 3.0
41 4 G17=103.0 IL j G ll 3" kPEP 0.15% 1 11)0 011 1,1 1 n PL4NNED PROPERTY CORNER
---VALLEY lNi 9- SLOPE q:)UTH TO 101.qAS SHOWN " I I
'
UNff-5 -6
9 3 AMNY TAM"" SIGN & PAIN+
1,0WCURSTO HERE
w * * -1313#5(REST�ICTOR)
_E t) SEE DETAIL - SHT 1/4 1ST 03.5
IS,
EG
S
P.,
'VALLEY' w
m 11, 111,
.41 w (Q.
+
ZZ I
m
0' F EP16
D
p
FW
14,
'M l(
14e
103.0 1 "EG 102.8 EG 102.3
(IL
EKIST. BUILDING
51jil #1604' 9010
A10
SSMH OF
J.JSS 3TA 1+45
10 6 Ill 94.76
ROA DIS TORM DRA
EG 99.30
IPE (IN BACKGRD
. (7JNSURVEYED CORNER)
X 2'ReFERENcEpcwrToRML1NE
DOR1111111FIl
120 NEWCONTOURLINES
CLE4RING LIMIT LINE
NEWWATERM4WOTSERWCE
DRiVEWAYPROFME
EX WAMTAl OR SMWW
SCALEOHORM 1ff=20'L0ff* VERT.- 1"01-0
(ALONG DRIVEWAY CEMERLINE) EX a4N. SEMM U41N OR SERWCE
-
0
SF
2.2' RO KERY WALL SEE SECT. B-
2' ROTK
EL 104 SOUTH BLDG NORTH BLDG
z 1ST FLR=103.5
:1 -
M in-Z w\- F G F=103. -7 0/61 ll F
SCALE." IN= 20"l U+UU
MULTIPLE I'WTR
PROPOSED APT BLDG IN FOREGROUND
U)
z
1 r
UTILITY ACCESS EASEMENT
0
0
UNIT FENCE
to
w
z
GRADE TO VALLEY Ill AS SHOWN
_j
EX. GRADE ON N. PR PERTY LINE
113�4
-ROCKERY ALO G N. PROP. LN
<
1ST FLR=103.5
CON C.
FIN GR 0 PATIO
F JAIO=102.0
36" ND-12 DETENTION PIPE
V UNIT PRIVACY, FENCE
1+00
iiiiiiiiiiiii-CIE1#10 (1Q
44' 36" N12 PIPE AT 07UOPE W/2' 24" DIA STUB'
LD
C=
D LD)
SEC T�O#V 29
SCALE:HORIZ: 1" = 20'; VERT: 1" 2'
(ALONG CENTER OF NORTH BAdKYARD)
--------
6- SDR35 SEW
R 2
O
w
z
:J
Ld
0-
0
ry
z
1+00
E
Ll
36" DIA DETENTION PIPE -(BACKGROUND)
8' N12 @ ill N. OF
AT 3
5' S
N
PROP
LN
A
.
.
.
.
N
Q59,,EC Tf ON A A
SCALE:HORIZ: 1" 20'; VERT: 1 2
w
z
imi TYPE Ill 54 D14 MH
w
0-
0
w
0-
SEE NOTE I
RESTRICTOR ELBOW
8 Cl TO 8 0 CWP
SEENOTE6 IAW-46.20
SEENOTE3
P PIPE SEC77ON
RESTRICTOR PL W10i
AS SPECIFIED.
EX. GRADE
VSE SOLID LOCKING COVER
MRKED 1DRAINR & WILOCKIJYG BOLTS
RIM=103.80
AT 12w VER77M TO C8 JAWRT
_36wDA ill
MAXWrRSIJRFAQl
100 YR.0?eW--E1J6wA T 100. 30
I "
EL= 100.97
0
E 100�
;T;T 10
10 YR 1.04mAT 1W.00
MIN 2 ZRIZ0.64"AT.96.20
SHEAR G4 TE Ill CONTROL ROD FOR
CLEMOUTIVRNN-BENDASREOD
FOR VER77CAL ALIGNMENT WICOVER
1. USE REMO V. WA TER TIGHT COUPL ING
ELBOW VER77CAL TO BE 12ffMIN.
2. USE OIVE3wXO 090w(34GEPIPESUPPORT
A T 3VFJ? 77CAL SPA ClAil MAXIMUM
3. G4SRETED BAND TO ALLOWREMOVAL.
4. ALL METAL TO BE CORROSION RESISTMT
CB#5 RESTRICTOR DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
j ?,'I al 7j
rip
A -
i
mozzlol 1107170 1717 t7li Ill Iv
I I i ol I k 0 L1177,17
-11,1 P,=77,77 o7ll
4"1
71 14A7#7 iiii ill T
_74
10
7771,77777
0 -7 =,7_AU,1lIl
T 70 �771:; 14.,'/ i':Z,�f "11 IA: :�V:Hffllll
:Ilk
7 r "I'll
=0771 I I ii $jij I I I Ili i It
.9iii-vi
#17- k :Iii- 71�-
i k J
h7w-TUM, 1,77-17,77,
:7 /1
JA
77
__ _7
FIR
7 "177, #
711 J,
7 il L
L
MAJ
Ill [vie JiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
"W�
V177m.77.1mm
MIL U 771
m
ff
w
1 Imp.
WA
___
9792 EDMONDS WAY
EDA!ONDS, WA 98020
APPLICANT:
A.D. i ARCHI TECTS, P.S,
6WAMINSTREET
EDMbNDS, WA 0020
PHONE. 425-778-5M
SURVEYOR:
A.F.M. INDU97RIES, INC.
20?6, MADISON STREET
0MMMil
0
mzffj��
01MAKON
MIMI
EVERE", WA 98203
PHON,E. 425,353-1
ENGWEER:
DEAA.f HOUGH 4 ASSOC14 TES
891811THSTNE
i
EVERill WA 98205
PHONE- 42643SO262
A FOR CONSTRUCTION
BY.- DATE.- 4047/0,2_
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPIRES:
APPROVED FOR MAILBOX LOCATION
BY.- DA TE.*
THOMAS SNYVEIZ POSTMAS
U S POSTAL SERVICE
L Z-1
General Notes
STrr"IEET FILE
LQ
r In
z�
3. CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS 8/5/03
Z., SECON
FIRST REVIEW 12/16/0
ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/02
No. Revision/issue Date
Sheet
OMOLIA COURT
6 UNITAPTS PROJECT
Date
Sept 12,202
Scale 4
IN 20 FEET
MIMCAMMO aM =t. IR-ADM 7117102 N14W
t
op,p,- EX. F. H.
MSTALL 4m STORZ ADAPTE AT S
S I
I EX. SSMH (PSS STA 2+74
8007 21 5TH ST SW ry
__J
I_ RIM 106.03 IE 98.05
215THSTSW
111,,,�,_
@
N
75 z
011
ry 4 TELEPHONE PVC CONDUIT TO APT BUILDINGS SEE NOTE 5
w___2�-
TO EACH ELEC. METER SET
LJJ 0-1
U) 17- 240/120V 1 PHASE FROM PP
>
n
b,
__J (C
00 T-4
ry
A
x
04.85 EG 105.1
- - - - /SET NAIL TOP
00
L
@ REMO)M
GAt MAIN
Cf)
CD
LO
x
I MWI 4.26
INUM
vpv
x
FOR UTI-ITY ACCES::; SEE
F ',';ITM
Al SO S
, SI
� Q
J
J
1 d 00.5
.3/101.25 1 0015 102. 12L.5Z100.5
160. IS(9033457 EG 100.2
00 -
+ 41 41 14, 14/ %4/ 1.1/ 4- -4/ 141
41 41
-3 INJ ALL NDUI1_
- 9.6
4,
t5i "" 1. - 11 R 141,
EE NOTE 3, E 0 N,
1ST F LI lk,3.5
JCE;
11
:-T�A P
PWR CHE 40 FOR SFRV/ LINE SE M
HH PROP�Ll E
AP E X;_---s ca PROP LI E
L.,,, C 0 N D. -41
ELELUNIT-1 UNIT-2 �NIT-3
. METERS FORI BLDG-EACH ISIDE SEE NJTE1 2
I
G F=103.0
Z J
N I I IT I r-, A
AS MAIN BIY OMHE
ms
E TRENCH
UNIT-5
IT-6
Do
LEGEND.
C=
EMSE WIRUMY, WHIGHPLUS
EVERGREEN TREE
DECIDUOUS TREF, S2E7SwMV(=V
PLMNED PROPERTY CORNER
(UNSU, ED CORNER)
IRVEY
X_
2'REFERENCE POINT 7*0 RM LINE
DOMWOUr
NEW COWOUR LINES
CLEMNG LimirLINE
NEWWATMAMWORSERVICE'
AEwa4N BEWERMARV OR SERVICE
EX WATER AWN OR aERNCE`
WC SM. SEWER MAfiV OR SERVICE
9.
!E!r
A(EMSMAFM?fiVTMWSMMISAfR7ENWAAVSWiMOFFBYAYVPEOM DS"H
EG 9.20 BURNAM AS SWIM & PW 07U IhISTALL SERtlW UNE FROU AWN THIRIJ COAIDUff TO aW
4 CAPPHO OF COADUff SIMLL BE PER PW STAMARDS SM MEETAI 1 F17R HUMMIM
aEVAn0N8&WfERLCrAWM
2. PO IM UIW SFIALL W IMMLLED FROM POLE TO MM*CW OPPROX MIXOMMESO)
ME11TOMETERSSMONEACHBUILOM. F0lbERLaWS1(1ALLfiE8IAA04RDRE3I1DENTlAL
LOW LESS GAS FOR HEA7WG SPACE & WATER LOAD SMALL BEATLE48TFOR MCROWAVES,
LU CLOThES DRYEMAND OVENFOR EACH UM hVSTALL49CONDUffFROMM.DG7VPOLEPER
P UD 8 PEG FrA nON&
&SXSIDESEMMSHAUBEATSSSTAD#40#MO#MOWAA01+17AND81 LLBE'r
0. 5' OFFO-PVCUAEAT2%&OPE7VLraSANWM(ASIY07EDABOMAAVATSSSTA
TEE'
1+20,*WrPMMCCOOUrSfDEAWASSIOMSUSE4wPVCUPSIRE4M. WELOCUM
LAMPME COVeW - FAM WOE
4 CMMSEIVEIRUhIDERIANTERONUMMEW111 CEMNAE02 %SLOPE TO drLAMPHOLEAS
SWWWAWJQWTOM41MMMMWMVWASSW*WATINVERTM8*4.
&M"IfOAECO=UffSWLBE4'PWSCHE40MRWLfiYLcAAfD2ffCOAVWrTOPOLF- A
frXfrPEDESTAL&li4LLREWTAUMATJUAL7=SWMV VER2W MLIAINTALL CABLE
ELSORCOAMMAREMMLLEDIMMMMAM 0WWffh1IAYfiEfiV
-EX FENCE 0A10E`PLVM=PAN
SAW 7WXH AS aW OR POKER MOVAIM A Ir CLEAR SEIWA 77ON fillf TAENCK
REWE EX WM. FOR IMMIATION FURPOSM PUrBACM0WPAEVEN7ER MW OF T1w
I WA TER MW.
NOTE: SEWER LA TER4L AND SIDE SEWERS ON FRIVA TE PROPERTY
SWLL BE MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS.
z
W.WALL UNIT4 . ....................... :T
. .......................... . ........
....... . .............................. ........ . .
99E 34
EG 1-d UNIT5 YARD UNIT 4 YARD
. .................. .................. . ..........
EX. GRADE
E.L 2.8 ,000�
E.I., 2.0
EL 1.5 . . .... 1--H] 11
AR Fl..R
4V
\1,1
N qW 1
INST4,LL C,,
14/ EG 99.
0
F- LOW ,
1 q,
I FMO
%4/
M
0 J.
30.00
x x
�EG
�03.
1
02.8/101.25
102.3/100.5
101.7/100.5- EG 100.1
102
ING
IFF
OM N.
S. PROPERTY LIN
C',
ADD
4'
ADAPTER
S
PWR POLE A� 70' S/SITE
TO EX. FIRE HYDRANT
EXIST. BU§LD§NG
SSMH CO)SS
101.56 1 E
ea
%-Z.
00
STA 1+45
9 4.7 6
P0,
90,
# 16041
sup
0�
copo
S CA L E:
10
'- 0,
EI..
0.4_00
J T W E T
EG 99.30
CONC, PATIO
+77.75
W L PR
S"'Al E: I 1101`�!:Z: 1" 20'; VER 1-: 1 2
z
b
(I
EX. GRAM
EL 1.7
1+17.75
LE
A.A.,.J EL 1.5
GAR FLIR,
........... .......................................................
....... . . . . ........ ... ........ .. . . EL (). 5
........... .................................... .................. . .... ................................................................................................... ....................... .................................................... .............. ............... -�l
..2 +27,75 +37.75 +77.75, 17.7 1+26.25
V-015
; . `-'F- WALL P[ IR OF I L E
Nr I I W
SCALE: HORIZ: 1 20'; VERT- 1 2'
General Notes
3. CONSTRUCTION REVISONS 8/5/03
SFQ�ONQ RUIEW, 1/28/0
1. FIRST REVIEW 4AZY4�
ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/02
No. Revision/Issue Date
A '01.11.
Project Name and Address
MAGNOLIA APAWMENTS
21501 BOTHAVE W
EDMONDS, WA 98020
MOLIA COURT Sheet
6 UNITAPTS PROJECT
Date
Sept 12,202
Scale
I IN 10 FEET
IMM C=1R_WWMW 7117MMW294 MW
EXPIRES. C f ITY OF EDMONDS
U)
@
,/CB
"RIM= 1
5.70
Z
11.E.=1
0.18
<
:2
z
tr
Ld
k
V*
10
� "I
T
A
NE 114 OF SECTION 30
TO WNSHIP 2 7 NOR TH, RA NGE 4 EA S T, W M.
0 a-
z
0
FILL FROM BLDGS TO BACK OF S/W TO LEVEL SHOWN
P
0) U4 z
0
:) Lo
q-
00 Ld
C� 00c) U�j
1�
00
0)
:
Cd 0
0)-
-j 0 Ld
11
Ld
LJ -j
- ui
< Lj C.) It
0 < zpi-
0
`�
Lii Cr
"I": Z)
\
W
> -0 V) Z < cr Iz M
�
'
N
-
60
B
CB#9
-104.80
0
0
IE-- .40
1
I
?,�P�,
k
so
I
PZ
I
0
FOR
UTILITY & ACCESS
1,
EG 105.1
104.3 101.25
s
104.2/100l15,
102.1/100.5
101.5/1 0.5
EE
EG 9.20
ALSO SO. SIDE OF SITE Z
SET NAIL TOP
MINCE POST
150.00'
ISBQJ33y
r-VK-
- -�; X
G 100.2
F-
OK
I
.41
�a :g
I �
o
0
0
+
0
I
E StN & PAINT
0. 5'
EL 10
V 14B
0 ERE
E
9. %
2" COMP. DEPTH CL. B ASPHA
3" COMP. DEPTH A
4. *
11
1ST FL 2.0
W/Sl z
k1LB )X lZUSTER',iffCATE 1'. 6
COMP DEPTH GRAVEL BORRO
AT
LK
AS SHC D NALK EX. FENCE
5'1 BACK. g�
IE=98.40
TILITY C,E. T. UNIT-1
41 CB#8(IL) R 101.35-\
`C
UN1T-2 UNIT-3 0 M
EL I O
, V) 1 '11 F' UTILITYMCCESS ESIl
CB#7, --1 1074 TO E. END OF DWY Of M
::li 5140 F='01.5 R L)
X E xm =101.
F=101.5
Ld
APRON PER C I A -A' r'n1110- I
W REVER E GR E DIAMOND
rT
BI I PROM E 'TE-RE-E) -0N-tfAtN-E!q4;� C
<
P6 C14 P7
P5 UANOPY
�G '7 4 )/ 2 - /111 1,
.............. -1. i:�l`
. . . . .... . ......................... 5' ROCKERY >,i z. EL 10(
Lo
V40
'g
11'� 4� ( I F=101.5
CB#6(l L =101.20
4Z- G1 F= 101.5 IL 101.5
-4 !E=98.40
-4
UNIT UNIT-5 NIT-6
+
TYP AL 03. NYT E" SIGN & PAI
*N) Mk hT
'�E=9 29 L INV V) 30 IACVV CL S
+ - I I ! L
C13#41[11-54") R=FG=103 SEE DETAIL
EX. B#2 RIM=10 7j RESTRICTOR CB: IE 1ST Fl-W102.0
IE=' A2(N,
E .40
9 7
l
JOI w2 'TO EX. H R
,_N
5.
EL 106
EL 104
EL 102
EL 1 00C
24" ND-
8" P�,
SECIION& &
SCALE: HORIZ: 1 20'; VERT: 1 2'
(ALONG CENTER OF BACKYARDS)
FL W
1 1 l
I
N.J 41 1 %
L`d-
41,
7= 151700,
G 103.0 102.8/101.25 102.3/100.5 101.
T/-100.5'� EG 100.1
j02
S I ling Area 2:1 SLOPE MAXIMUM
From . S.propertyline
EXIST. BUILDING
11(IL) CBRIM=103.81E=39.00
HALT RAIL E N. END C
D KCB TOP SHOWS SOLID COVER
PU FOR BY-PASS OFFDN DRAINAGE ONLY
901
1601-t
01
sup\\j
O�
ORD
.PL A
R' OA DIS "7llllllll`U" R M L)" RA / N N
SCALE: I to 20�-Olr
1
-41 CIA-
-G
- /I ��z
99.25
>
EG 99.30
EL 104
-j
EL 103 >-
F-
af
LLj
EL 102 0
EL 101 0
V)
EL 100
0+01
GRADE AT BLDG TO 13E 100.5
ALL AROUND EXCEPT IN FRONT
8"PVC SEWER @5'N. OF P/L W/4" PVC TEES
(UNIT I SEWER IN BACKGROUND
MULTIPLI(�TR SERVICES---J
:jjz -
2: 0 , LL
C.4 d <
Uj CN
t L)
N
-C
11 LLIJ
Mm
(n
-1d LLJ
11
M 0
En 0)
Z 0�:D
11 W �- 0
(3
z
V)
Lo (n 0
Uj R::
-j w 0
> E3 W
0
c)
X V) 0 LL-
It -
unj 1 0o6
X
Uj 0
M
. 't < - V)
LO
U-
0
F-: 0) Ld
Er
. EL (00
't to - D
0 . 0
0
X z [L
IL -
�Lj
z
7-
X >� W
y
0
[L
0 LLj
LO 11 W wo-
0 :2
<
�i
N
z to
LT 0
00
tk I.--
+
0
z
M �5-
M
�4
03
M <
q +
1,
+
L)
(0 >-
In
- 11�
T-
B-
Q It
+
4- � -64
- f v
+
N
0
1ST FLR=102.01ALL UNITS
GAR=101.1
-77 77-�
.2
5, RIM
ffiv
I
I I
'non",
I
/ 0 tl b I jtb A d[YE-IF11 1 7
/+
9 1 9 L
0)
L52
�,j,
4m,
"EFORE
ANY CONSTRUCTION; CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY 16"
VV I M MAIN UtFl h A I ti I URM URAIN CROSSING; TOP=97.12
V
PR OFIL E
DO` R VE WA
it
SCALE. HORIZ, I 20l VERT: 1`10�-O"
(A L ONG DRI VE WA Y CEN TERL INE)
CONC. WALL SEE WALL PROFILES, SHT 3
LU
z
F-
W
0
D-
It
o-
Ld
0
00
+
in St.
I
3::
212th S1.
SW
<
ITE
F'S
216th St. SV7-
4 216th !;t.
218th S
SW
. SW
220th St.
SW
<
<
_C
1222nd S
Sf
;4!
-001",
001
ITYMAP
V/G IN
2000'
LfUEND:
L
00bo
EXIST SHRUBBRY, 6'HIGH PLUS
EVERGREEN TREE
(1. 0 j DECIDUOUS TREE
SIZE SHO WN(DIA)
PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER
(UNSURVEYED CORNER)
2"REFERENCE POINT TO RIW LINE
0 DOWNSPOUT
NEW CONTOUR LINES
CL EA RING L IA41 T L INE
NEW WA TER MAIN OR SERVICE
NEW SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE
EX W4 TER MA IN OR SER VICE
EX. SAN SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE
TOP ELEV OF WALLABASE ELEVOF
WALL
CBMANHOLEWITHsoLID COVER
lilt",
z
>-
F-
NORTH BLDG ry 1. Sidewalks shall be per City of Edmonds standa
d drawings
LLI
a-
0 and surfacin sha# also be per City of Edmonds standards.
11�
n 2. Curb and gutters sha# be as specified in the City of Edmonds,,51andards or APWA, current edfion.
access driveway paving shafl be according to the paving se,.-�',On shown in the profile hereon.
z 4. Mailbox clustershall be on 80th Av Was shown & installed accoldi'l to USPS standards and
andlor coordinated with the local postmaster.
PAVE PER FIRQF�ILE �LqOV4
1+00 wfrontagepaving along 80th Av shafl drain 'to 10' tho south end of frontage.
CONC. ENCAS
EA. PIPE
'AT 6" MIN. ALL OUND 6. Power and telephone conduits shall be installed unde' frolN the existing pole' (see sht 3) to the
-24" DIA D TE�TION PIPES AT a a 1. ent buildings as shown.
6'-2" SEP AFION; CTR TO CTR locations are approximate and the contractor shag explore 'and
locate existing lines to make sure of location, depth and afignl.
11PVC S 'S. OF P/L W/4" TEES The City and Engineer are not responsible for said locations shom hereon.
MULTIPL SERV ICES 8. The driveway cut In the sidewalk sha# slope 2% into the site as s117own on the prorile.
A 9. The contractor sha# be responsible to obtain afl necessary permh's and
notify the City 24 hours in advance of any construction..
10. Traffic control shag b6per traffic plan & coordinated with the City of Edmonds Traffic
.)UALE:HUR1Z: 1" 20'; VE R T: 1 2)
Engineer pnor to beginning the work in 80th A v W
11. A# foundation drains sha# connect into CB#1 I as shown which is at the southwest comer of site.
Tie a#downspouts to the detention pipe as shown and use 4"P11Cpioe.
12.Fill level from the back of sidewalk to the retalnin wall -building '
9 wag as shown in the prol
s shown.
13. Minimum slope for side sewers is 2% on all side sewer
14. Miniumum cover over the I " water service lines is 24 on both selv ce trenches sho
wn
OWNER:
SOUTHI3LQ.G-
1ST FLR=102.0
--]G F=101.
TYPE 54 DIA MH
SEE NO TE I
RE5TRICTORELBOW
PIP E SUPPORT
SEE NOTE 2
12 CPEP TO 12"CMP
SEE NOTE 5 V=98.1
MIN 2 OJ?IF=O. 71"A T 96.40
SHEAR GATE W1 CONTROL ROD FOR
CLEANOUNDR41N - BEIVD AS REQ`D
:z: FOR VER TICA L A L IGNIVEN T WICO VER
T
SEE NOTE 3
j 1
PIPE
1. USEREMOV WATERTIGHTCOUPLING
'T'ON�.l
RES"
TRIC TOR
PL W10 ELBOW VERTICAL TO BE 12- MIN.
AS SPECIFIED.
2 USE ONE XWO.09011 GAGE PIPE SUPPORT
A T XVER TICAL SPACING MAxIMUM
3. GASKETED BAND TO ALLOW REMOVAL.
4. ALL METAL TO BE CORROSIONRESISTANT
6 JOIN PIPES WISAND STRAP WFFH GASKET
CB#4
RES TRIC TOR DE TA IL
NOT TO SCALE
USE SOLID LOCKING COVER
MARKED "DRAIl W1 LOCKING BOLTS
alM=103.80
POLYPROPYLENE HANDHOLDS
A T 12 " VER FICA L TO CS IN VER T
-94 " DIA OMP
I C
MAX WTR S EL= 100.25
OOYRO =1.39"AT99.80
IOYRO IF=1
15"AT99
60
R. CHARLIE NA THAN I NALUND CONSTRUCTION Co.
9792 EDY', ONDS WAY
EDMOND WA 98020
APPLICANT:
A.D.S. ARCHITECTS, P.S.
600 MAIN S TREE T
EDMOND-3', WA 98020
PHONE. 4,25-778-5400
SURVEYOR:
.
.
A;F
M. 1ATILISTRIES INC.
262'6 MAL,�ISON STREET
EVERETT WA 98203
PHONE.'-�,?5-353-8950
-ENGINEER:
DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES
8918 11THSTNE
EVERETT; WA 98205
PHONE. 425
-3,15-0262
CB#
TYPFE-10CATION
--RIM
&2�WVV,-G-O-VER
4
-
11-54"
-F-'0+37.5,
0+37.5, 39.0'RT
103.8
Y6.40
RD SOLID
5
1-46-
ON CTR
I 02.72
98.40
_
SOLID
6
IL
1+67.5, ON CTR
10 1.20
98.40
_RD
GRATE, S
7
-LI_-48'
0+37.5, 6.2'LT
102.74
98.40
RD SOLID
1+76.0.6.2'LT
101.45
, o
-CM ID
1.481?
�0+375,42't
-W4-K.98.40
10
L
10+16.0,47'RT
98.29
_gp_SOLID
GRA TE
0+32.5,48'RT �-103,80
19ROO
11
--SQSOLID
PIPE INFORMA T1
PIPE#
L6AtG_TH
TYPE
SLOPE
CB# -REMARKS
P2
35'
10CPEP
0.47%
CB#10
P3
20'
-7-�
-Y5
12"dP-EP
0.47%
CB#4
R TRICTOR
P4
24"Ni2
Tq-.1ZB-#5
P5
127'
240 N12
0%
CB#6
P6
24 - N 12
0 %
P7
135,
2,F-
Ni2
o %
CB#8
P8
CB#9
P9
15'
13.81
% I
CB#11
FOR FQN DRAIN
L
APPR FOR CONSTRUCTION
B DA TE.
rj-7
Cily OF EDMONDS
General Notes
12. ISECOND REVIEW 1/28/0
12/16/0
1. FIRST REVIEW
ISSUE FOR PERMIT /12/02
N a. Revision/Issue Date
rF'.,m Name and Address
DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES
8918 11THSTNE
EVERETT, WA 98205-1407
PHONE 425-335-0262
rP11ject `7 �OldAddess
MA GNOL A A PA R TMEN R
2150180 TH A VE W
EDMONDS, WA 98020
...... .
Sheet
OekoLIA COURT
6 UNITAPTS PROJECT
Date
Sept12,2002
Scale
1 IN 20 FEET
P3.'98;i C2201_1R2.DWG 71171o2ra,1128,,03
re-% I- "'
UJ
NE 114 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH
RANGE 4 EAST, WM
00
SUR ve�
P, CCORD
EXISS7. BUILDING
#16041901BI
ESCIGRADING PLAN
SCALE. 111=20�-O"
FENCE
A. ESC Minimum Requirements. All activities necessitating a clearing or grading permit and all utility projects consisting of more
than 500 lineal feet of trench excavation shall be required to control erosion sediment during construction and to permanently
stabilize exposed soil resulting from construction. Projects involving a critical area may also be required to comply with any
combination of the ESC minimum requirements. Compliance will be demonstrated through the Implementation of an approved
ESC plan. Guidelines for preparing ESC plans are provided in the manual. The plan must address the following requirements:
1. ESC minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practical, limited to
one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or crushed rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public
roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads shall be cleaned throroughly at the end of each day. Sediment
shall be removed from roads by shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours.
Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment Is removed in this manner.
2. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of exposed areas. All'soils e)posed by land disturbing activities shall be stabilized
by suitable application of BMPs, Including, but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching
All BMPs shall be selected, designed and maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized
according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two days from October I through
April 30 and no more than seven days from May 1 through September 30).
3. ESC Minimum REquirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected from sediment
deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or mulching, or by a combination of
these measures and other appropriate BMPs.
4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be reqularly inspected and
maintained by the owner to ensure continued performance of their Intended function. All maintenance and repair shall be
conducted in accordance with the manual.
5' ROCKERY 5. ESC Minimum Requirement - Other BMPs. As required by the city, other appropriate BMPs to mitigate the effects of increased
runoff shall be applied.
6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Underground Utility Construction. The construction of underground utility lines
shall specifically address the following:
a. erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials;
b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be placed on the uphill side
of trenches;
c. Trench dewatering'systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable means);
d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling;
e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance.
7.Additional ESC Minimum Requirements for Larger Developments. All new development and redevelopment that includes land
disturbing activities of greater than, or equal to, one acre in addition to meeting the minimum requirements set forth above shall
comply with ESC requirements listed below:
8. ESC Minimum Requirement - Delineate clearing and easement limits. In the field, mark clearing limits and/or any easements,
setbacks, sensitive/critical area and the buffers, tree and drainage courses.
9. ESC Minimum Requirement - Sediment Trapping. Prior to leaving the site, storm water runoff shall pass through a sediment
pond or sediment trap, or other appropriate BMPs. Seclimen . t ponds and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers, and other
BMPs intended to trap sediment on -site shall be constructed as a first step in grading. These BMPs shall be functional before
land disturbing activities take place. Earthen structures, such as dams, dikes, and diversions shall be seeded and mulched
according to an approved timetable.
10. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and fill slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will
minimize erosion. In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC Requirement No. 2.
11. ESC Minumurn Requirement - Controlling Off -site Erosion. Pruperties and water ways downstream from development sites
shall be protected from erosion due to increase in the volume, velocity, and peak flow rate of storm water runoff from the project
site.
12. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Temporary Conveyance Channels and Outlets. All temporary on -site
conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed and stabilized to prevent erosion from the expected velocity of flow from a
two-year, 24-hour frequency storm for the developed condition. Stabilization adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent
stream banks, slopes and downstream reaches shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems.
13. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storm Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable during construction shall be
protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to
remove sediment.
14. ESC Minimum Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be
removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped
sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilized.
15. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Dewatering Construction Sites. Dewatering systems shall discharge into a
sediment trap or sediment pond.
16. Erosion and sediment Control Requirement - Control of Pollutants other than Sediment on Construction sites. All pollutants
other than sediment that occur on site during construction shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause
contamination of storm water.
17. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Financial Liability. Performance bonding, or other appropriate financial
instruments, shall be required for all projects to ensure compliance with the aporoved erosion and sediment control plan.
-LEGEND:
0000 EXIST SHRUBBRY, 6'HIGH PLUS
EVERGREEN TREE
PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER
(UNSURVEYED CORNER)
X_ 2'REFERENCE POINT TO RM LINE
NEW CONTOUR LINES
/ SIL T FENCE L INE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. This construction sequence to to be used as a guideline. Conditions may
require changes In the timing of work. Changes shall be discussed with and
approved by the City Inspector and owner.
4 Talli 9 1 a: 11 id till,11111 1111,18
a sp -0220, ext. 1328) 24
!;�1�1111347tor. Call' the Enginewaiiii irill I otion line (425-771
hours In advance to schedule Inspe Tons and to not up a preconstruction
_T as cc an
3. -Frdg _rT0t-_0_f-_Wcy lnsfi� PrOiiifY iin-68 On -cle ng ImIts Indi tod
the plan.
4. Install ollt fences and construction entrance per plan. All TESC Items are
to b: chocked daily during the winter construction season. Any stockpiles are
to b covered If left for more then 2 days and rain to expected. All alto
disturbance Is to stop during rain and all TESC Items are to be chocked and
monitored. Any Items allowing elt laden water to pass shall be repalrod
Immediately.
5. Clear & grub to clearing limits, In this case the whole site.
6. Rough grade access driveway.
7. Install storm drainage. detention pipe. water quality features and other
utilities.
8. Complete road construction.
9. Hydroseed disturbed land surfaces. Ecomat MOY be necessary for slopes
3:1 and greater during the winter construction Mason.
10. Clean storm drainage system and place Into operation.
11. Remove remaining T.E.S.C. structures after site has-been stabilized and
approved by the City Inspector.
T.E.S.C. PLAN NOTES
ALL SITE DISCHARGE MUST MEET WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 7-53 SOO (5 NTU MAX). IF ANY SILT LADEN WATER IS DBsERVED
AT ANY. TIME, PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY FOR REVISED
OR ADD17IONAL MEASURES.
GRADING NOTES
1. EST'. QUANTITY OF CUT: 845 CU. YDS.
2. EST. QUANTITY OF EXCAV. & EMBANKMENTS: 856 CY
3. EST. QUANTITY OF SURPLUS TO EXPORT: 834 CY
4. PROPOSED D
Z
AND SHALL OUTSIDE OF EDMONDS CITY LIMITS.
L'M" 3
Ur _Y�
0 r
5. EST. QUANTI O�FIMP
N�� "V'5.0
6. TOTAL AREA EARED: 15,000 S F
APPRQVF,D FOR CONSTRUCTION
BY. I IAZ� DA TE. 2- 0
�// 2L3
CITY OF E-D-MONDS
General Notes
11-)t1,UNU l1tVlt.W 1/28/0
IFIRST REVIEW 12/16/0
ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/02
No. I Revision/Issue Date I
Firm Name and Address
DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIATES
8918 11THSTNE
EVERETT, WA 98205-1407
PHONE 425-335-o262
Project Name and Address
MA GNOL A A PA R TMEN TZ, 3
2150180 TH A VE W
EDMONDS, WA 98020
Vo� --
f164MOLIA COURT Sheet
6 UNITAPTS PROJECT
Date 2
S pt 12
- e 20.02
Scale 4
1 IN = 20 FEET
k - ___J!
h6- P398 C220t_2ESDWG 7117102re. 1128103
EXPIRES. 4/5/25671
NE 114 OF SEC TION 30, TO WNSHIP 2 7 AIOR TH, RANGE 4 EA S Ty W M
Lr� 000%
LuEND:
I / I 1� \ " < I )
ry -1 4 TELEPHONE PVC CONDUIT TO APT BUILDINGS
TO EACH ELEC. METER SET
Ld ry
240/120V 1 PHASE FROM PP
U)
> SSMH#3'RIM=1=104.,3 IE-97.83(OUT)Q)
n AT PROF. STA 0+32.5; 45'LT.
co
ry 00
x X1 UTILITYNOTES:
III I. CONTRACTOR TOINSTALL20t-3"SCHE40 WHITE PVC WITH ELBOW FROM PROPERTYLINE TO
EG 1 104.3/1 1.25 LO . �21 0 101.V100.5 BUILDINGS AS SHOWN & PSE WILL INSTALL SERVICE LINE FROM MAIN THRU CONDUIT TO GAS
�i _ EG 100.2
T LL..15 ::L_ / 4 - METER SETS AFTER INTERNAL SYSTEM IS AIR TESTED AND SIGNED OFF BY INSPECTOR. DEPTH
TO -.105.35 -�J 150. 101 1/1 r --- I I
104.85 05 102.1/ 00.5 EG 99.20
T- FENQE POST IS89 3345"E x
__/SET VIL TOP
00 &CAPPING OF CONDUIT SHALL BE PER PSE STANDARDS. SEE SHEETA3.1 FOR BUILDING
ELEVATIONS& METERLOCATIONS.
2. POWER LINE SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM POLE TO HANDHOLE (APPROX. 56 X 6 X42 DEEP)
C) Cl) AND TO METERS SETS ON EACH BUILDING. POWER LOAD SHALL BE STANDARD RESIDENTIAL
@ REMOVE D&C 0.5 LOAD LESS GAS FOR HEA TING SPACE & WA TER. LOAD SHALL BEA T LEAST FOR MICROWA VES,
1 Z6 P VQQ S� F� PI" % SLOP� CLOTHES DRYERS AND OVEN FOR EACH UNIT. INSTALL 4" CONDUIT FROM BLDG TO POLE PER
w -
PUD SPECIFICA TIONS.
F1
<I, GA' MAIN INS1/41-1- L 5 2 3. SS SIDE SEWER S TA TIONING FOR EA CH L INES'HA L L BE 0+40 A ND 0 +80 - EA CH L INE AND
0- SHALL BE 4"'TEE OFF 8"PVC LINE& PLACE CLE4NOUT OUTSIDE BLDG AS SHOWN. USE
9. LOCKING LAMPHOLE COVERS - EACH SIDE SEWER - 4 EA.
S STA; SEE Nf)TE 31 4. CROSS SEWER OVER WATER AT5'NIS. PROP. LINE EKTEND IN 8"DI, PIPE, CLASS 52 @1%
cf) V I q/ SLOPE, I- 20'JOINT WITH JOINTA T2'FROM MH#2.
EE DTE I 1ST FUR=162.0 5. TELEPHONE CONDUIT SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHE 40 TO PJW LINEAND 21, CONDUIT TO POLE. A
< "I � - ) \1/ 12"X12"PEDESTAL SHALL BE INSTALLEDATJUNCTION SHOWN. VERIZONWILL INSTALL CABLE
A CD 'J)WfVNiT���SCHE 40 FOR SLRV/LINE SEE--N=-I- ONCE PLYWOOD PANELS OR CONDUITSARE INSTALLED INSIDE BUILDINGS. CONDUITMAYBEIN
PWR d PROP LINE EX. FENCE SAME TRENCHAS GAS OR POWER PROVIDED A 12"CLEAR SEPARA TION IN TRENCH.
HH A P E X. SWR 6. REUSE EY. WAM. F-Q8 IRRIGA TION PURPOSES; PUT BACKFLOWPREVENTER WEST OF THE
LO
F I -Qv D W D P E T
NOTE: SEWER LATERALSAND MANHOLES ONPRIVATEPROPERTy
UNIT-1 I I UN1T-2 I 11UNIT-3 SHALL BEMAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS.
x
3 ELH-C. METERS FO BLDG-EACHI SIDE - SEE NOTF� 2
BE I'' PROFIH
cn--L'� ..........
IK
AS MAI B Y 0 H S"
03.
FC� 1� 03.
T S STA +20; J. I N.,
IM -03. 6 � IE--
ASP
SE 2 2'- D 'C
ECHANN I\IE PER S-
PWR POLE Al 7
pal
0!5
\I/
M M I N
0
EXIST SHRUBBR Y, 6'HIGH PLUS
EVERGREEN TREE
DECIDUOUS TREE, SIZE SHOWN(DIA)
PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER
(UNSURVEYED CORNER)
SEENOTE5 2'REFERENCE POINT TO RIW LINE
DOWNSPOUT
b
NEW CONTOUR LINES
I CLEARING LIMITLINE
NEW WA TER MAIN OR SERVICE
\B Vap SSMHB4 R1 -inn IF=.QR r--,F\(nHT)i NEW SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE
AT PROF. �Y\A 1+62; 51T. EX WATER MAIN OR SERVICE
Ov EX. SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE
- 5?\A FOR UTI-ITY & ACCES SEE
N LSO So. SID'E OF SITJ
I F- [ . . ...... I I/
G -101.5_ F- 101. 5 G F-101.5 z
0
0-
EW SERVICES 11 DIA IN E CH -
IF, z
W.WALL UNIT4
re
CANOPY
0
91--tc
NEW 1 SERVICE I ON'- TRENCH
r EL 1.
G F=101.5 11 IS F-101.5 -T- <
L IL -101.5
UNIT 5 YARD
UNIT 4 YARD
EX - GRADE
EL 2.8 J1-
UNIT-4 UNIT-5 I IUNIT-6 1 +05
EL 1.7
EL 05
+77.75 1+17.75
NV \1/
LLL4.MLlLN bLI I \11 "I", SOUTHWEST WALL PROFILE
GASI METER SET 1 2
SCALE:HORIZ: 1" = 20'; VERT: 1 =.2)
SSMH#2 RIM=103.8 IE=97.30(OUT) I (", 1,1
)�- I I " .1 1 IST FLR�102.0
at SS STA 0+32.5;1 44'RT.
EQ 99.25
EL 4.9
12\Q'-E�'PV(; SFWERPIP\E 9)g. 5 S L,0, P E N
0
0
S89 '45"E
I- 15C.001
�CG 103.0 102.8/101.25 102.3/100.5 101.7/100.5 EG 1M1
---a-STNGIN ARE 02 EG 99.30
F OMN.TDS.PROPERTYLIN
QQhAI---1 r7, QIKA i ni r-- I
ADT 4 STORZ ADAPTER
TO EX. FIRE, HYDRANT
AIN
21 UT): 97.08(IN)
SEE N TE 4
F."A\E6.1 ON SHT 2/
SM S STA 14-45
101.46 IE 9 4. 7 6 P�3?\AN'
S/SITE
EXIST. BUILDING
I 016041901BI
0p\0 0�
\cc
AT PROF. STA 1+62; 45' T.
JOIN 4 1$ SIDE SEWERS WIT 8"X4" TEES
V Q A
TILI
SCALE. I of= W-0"
EL 1.5
z
0
W. WALL UNIT 1
EL 5.29 z
/-EX. GRADE
Q
UNIT
1 BACKYARD
- EL 4.3
UNIT 2 BACKYARD
EL 4.2
Z-)
0
R
\R FLR
L
H 1111
lill Jill
I III
L 2.
G,
+27.75
+37.75
+77.75
4
0+00
+05
EL 1.5
EL 0.5
1+26.25
NORTHWEST WALL PROFILE
SCALE:HORIZ: 1" = 20'; VERT: I" = 2'
APPR
VED FOR CONS TRUC TION
BY- DA TE. /Z
lw��- rp
WIRES: 4/5/2ou I Cn Y OF EDMONDS
General Notes
2. ISECOND REVIEW 1/28/03
1. FIRST REVIEW 12/16/0
IISSUE FOR PERMIT /12/02
No. I Revision/Issue Date
Firm Name and Address
DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES
8918 11THSTNE
EVERETT, WA 98205-1407
PHONE 425-335-0262
Project Name and Address
MA GNOL 1A A PA R TMEN T,')'
2150180 TH A VE W
EDMONDS, WA 98020
117MOLIA COURT Sheet
6 UNITAPTS PROJECT
Date
Sept 12, 2002
Scale 4
1 IN = 10 FEET
P3.'96 C2201P,-3W.DWG 7117102 RE0214,11128103
I
SSMH
RIM=106.03
LE.=98..05
NE 114 OF SEC TION 30, TO WNSHIP 2 7 NOR TH, RA NGE 4 EA S T; W M.
General Notes
C8
RIM=105.70
LE.=100.18
CB
RIM=102.97
I.E.=98.12
30'
SSMH 0+00
RIM=101.87
I.E.=94.61
LL--
EXIST. BUILDING
boo 90
0�
150.00'
S89*38'30"E
cr)
BENCHMARK
TOP MON
ELEV= 100.00 ASSUMED 180.00,
S89-3830"E (BASIS OF BEARING)
\_FND. 2" BRASS DOME
WI'5co IN CONC, 216 th 5t. 5. W
(CASED)
I
0.51
EK. CHAINLINK FENCE
CONS m17w1v_m?6UCT1ON NOTES
1. All workmanship gpd-iVatefials shall be in accordance with City of Edmonds
standards and thQ2CJO2 dition of the State of Washington Standard
Specifications'for ridge and Municipal Construction(WSDOTIAPWA).
2. Temporary erosionlWaterpollution measures she# be required in accordance
with the Erosion--& Control Notes shown on sheet 214.
3. Comply with cApther permits and other requirements by the City of
4.KCall be t�ity-oYE�kho'nds-En4ine6yrinb"l'ns-oeclYon rine (425--771-0220, ext 1326) to
a pre -construction meeting and Call 24 hours in advance for inspections
alignment by A F M Industries Inc or an engineering or surveying firm
capable ofperforming such work.
6. Storm drain p,,;oe shflmeet the following requirements:
A. Plain concrete pipe conforming to the requiremnis of AASHTO M 86, Class 2.
B. Reinforced concrete pipe conforming to the requirements fo AASHTO M- 170.
C. PVC pipe conforming to ASTM D 3034 SDR 35 orASTM F 789 withJbints
and gaskets conforming to ASTV D 3212 and AASTM F 477.
D. Ductile Iron pipe conforming to the requirements of A INWA C 15
E. Polyethylene smooth wafl pipe per Advance Drainage Systems
constructeAper WSDOTIAPWA Standard Specifications 7-04.
7 Deleted
8. Provide traffic'Wh't-r6p15n(-s-Jas ii-e—quiie-d- in —accordance with MUTCD.
9. Ce# underground locate line 1-800-424-5555 minimum 48 hours prior to any
excavations.
10. Where connections require "field verifications", connection points will be exposed
by Contractor and rittings verified 48 hours prior to distrIbuting shut -down
notices.
LEGEND:
0000
EXIST SHRUBBR Y, 6'HIGH PLUS
EVERGREEN TREE
DECIDUOUS TREE, SIZE SHOWNI'DIA)
PLANNED PROPERTY CORNER
(UNSURVEYED CORNER)
X_
2'REFERENCE POINT TO RIW LINE
0
DOWNSPOUT
NEW CONTOUR LINES
I CLEARING LIMIT LINE
NEW WATER MAIN OR SERVICE
NE IN SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE
EX WATER MAIN OR SERVICE
EX. SAN. SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE
BA 515 OF BEA RIN6 (9 Y PL 5):
R.O.S. A.F. #7604190181
LE&END:
+ EXISTING MONUMENTAS SHOWN
SET RE-BARICAP STAMPED LS 30442
El WHITE LINE STAKE
(C) CALCULATED DATA
(D) DEED DATA
(M) MEASURED DATA
(P) PLAT DATA
EQUIPMENT& PROCEDUPE:
LEICA TC1010 TOTAL. STATION FOR FIELD TRAVERSE
PRECISION MEETS OR EXCEEDS STANDARD SET BY
W.A. C. 332-130-090.
LEOAL DESCRIPTTON:
THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE NORTH 410 FEET OF
THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF
THE WEST ONE-HALF OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP
27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.;
EXCEPT THE WEST30 FEET FOR COUNTY ROAD KNOWN
AS 80TH AVE. W.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 0 0 0 0
IN FEET
I inch = 000 ft.
(VISITED 0410412002) -9111— AW% 0 1
/ 5 --- L.AN
EXISTING IMPROVEMEN
SCALE. 111=20�-Orl
FND. 2"BRASS DOME
WI"x" IN CONC.
\(CASED)
—(VISITED 0410412002)
0
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
�11
BY,__ie416C= DA TE at 2,10 -3
OTI) V nb-1 b_1nA11_nATnQ
I EVIRES: 4/5/2004 11
1. FIRST REVIEW 2/1 "/
ISSUE FOR PERMIT 9/12/0�2
No. Revision/Issue I Date I
Firm Name and Address
DEAN HOUGH & ASSOCIA TES
8918 11THSTNE
EVERETT, WA 98205-1407
PHONE 425-335-0262
Project Name and Address
MA GNOL 1A A PA R TMEN TS
2150180TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA 98020
C0MOLIA COURT Sheet
6 UNITAPTS PROJECT
Ar
5'46 0
6 UNITA�
Date 4
Sept 12,2002 %
Scale I IN = 20 FEET J4
h�_ P3:98 C2201 4EX DWG 7117102 Re: 112M3