21507 73RD PL W.PDF111111111111
5803
21507 73RD PL W
ADDRESS:221 t� 215(2
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): 20D I C6 2—'5
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR Rm1RidyC2QQ1 QS .02Z+
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver E] Study Required ;�4-WXaiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED
PERMITS (OTHER): IM24WcgO
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE:s , 12.) *sp LOT: 6 BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: -,�04
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: /
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: q, /.
OTHER:
LATEMP\DSTs\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc
01 W,
ADDRESS: �21 qO et 91 qQ 7 7Z�2e' /0L
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: F] Conditional Waiver F] Study Required E] Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED
PERMITS (OTHER):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
SOILS REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: 0 2--
--- 0AlA1/AAi11.4--7j-r,4 AtlA J I e A
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
LATEMP\DSTs\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc
41 �n C. 1891,
0 1� ' . 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 7711-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 21, 2002
Hossein Ahmadnia
122 NE 158th St
Seattle, Wa 98155
Re: Request for Address Change
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia;
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
- IF
This letter is to inform you that your request for an address change has been
granted. The old address Of 21405 73rd PI W is noW 21507 73rd PI W and
21407 73rd A W is noW 21505 73rd PI W. This may seem confusing at first
but the numbers must get smaller as they go north So 21507 must be south of
21505. 1 will inform all City Divisions including Fire, Police, Utility Billing, Public
Works and Building.
It is your responsibility to inform the Post Office, the Phone Company for
Enhanced gii emergency purposes and all other interested parties of this
correction.
Si cerely,
ra Palma 'er
Permit Coordinator
.City of Edmonds
Cc: Fire Department
Police Department
Utility Billing
Public Works
Building Official/Street File
L\Ternp\DST's\Master Letters\Address Change
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Nov 21 02 01:09P
ViraCe LoGic Corp.
0
(425)746-86a3
0
P.
Nov 21, 2002
Fax: 425-771-0221
Attn: Lara Palmatier
Hi Lara,
I am requesting a change to the following addresses:
Old Address New Address
21405 73,d pl W 21505 73rd PI W
21407 73d PI W 21507 73,d pl W
The current addresses do not correspond with the street crossing
Best Regards,
H�o i A4mad 'a
�sein
206-715-0747
-CEIVED
1q 21 2002
BUILDING DEPT.
-( tic. 1 8C)"
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 21, 2002
Hossein Ahmadnia
122 NE 158th St
Seattle, Wa 98155
Re: Request for Address Change
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia;
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
This letter is to inform you that your request for an address change has been ..
granted. The old address Of 21405 73rd P1 W is nOW 21507 7'3rd P1 W and
21407 73rd P1 W is nOW 21505 73rd P1 W. This may seem confusing at first
but theinumbers must get smaller as they go north SO 21,507 must be south of
21505. 1 will inform all City Divisions including Fire, Police, Utility Billing, Public
Works and Building. :
It is your responsibility to inform the Post Office, the Phone Company for
Enha'nced gil emergency purposes and all other interested parties of this
correction.
9 Si cer4ely,.
a P a9l m a 'e
r
Permit Coordinator
City of Edmonds
Cc: Fire Department
Police Department
Utility Billing
Public Works
Building Official/Street File
L\Ternp\DST's\?Aaster lzttms\Addmw Change
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Nov 21 U?- UI:UZJP
virage Lorgi6 L-ur-v.
Nov 21, 2002
Fax- 425-771-0221
Attn: Lara Palmatier
11i Lara,
I am requesting a change to the following addresses:
Old Address ' New Address
21405 73'd pl W 21505 73rd PI W
21407 73rd PI W 21507 73"' PI W
The current addresses do not correspond with the street crossing
Best Regards,
H Abmadru* a��,
7=' W
206-715-0747
/ED
BUILDING DEPT.
K'OTTE- NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY The inforniatic-n c�-own ci the
cnrnplitj fcT uze by the City ot
City of Edmonds does nU wurt..:
co ter.), on the map. Any person or entity rcz,�
C) ind-c-pendeent inquiry regarding the. lnio,�mjc�vc,, .,J C51-1
b,., not limited to, the location ot any scv.--i
5:aI*,, - m ay or m ay n ot mdst an d r, , ay or m --y r, c I C""! -- 11 rl
th" Ircoaisc,-, Neither the City of Edmonds ncr its employ —3 or
Offlcz:'3 s:1 11 be fiz:j!a to,' the information given on this map, nor for �n'y' Ord
> represent"on provided based upon said map
x > 0 0
> Z:
* rri --i
z X M
> cn
0 Ln
00 0
N)
— — - — - — - — - — -
> 0 0
0 0
0 C/) cj1 'a
0
cf) CL 0 M
M
> 0 — -0
Ln (-n
0 =r
< CD
0
>
7
z
-U C/)
F
> go so
co 2-
ID 0000
C
CIL
-Pt 0
CD
U)
c/) 0 U)
0 -0 0
K: cD :E 000 --1
M
0 (n
cD Lo Zn o
(n
z
M
0 CL
CD
=c 0
Z: -0 -0 0
M
M
70 (D
CIO
C)
>
r-
0 �7
cn 12TH PL N
M
]RETURN ADDRESS:
City of Edmonds, City Gerk
121 5th Avenue,,North
Edmonds, WA 98020
V1.7
FILE
,-OONFORMED COPY
-21001-08,07-0284
08/07[2001 1,2!.42"PM Sn-ohomish
P.-0002 RECORM6 ' County
DECLARATION aF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Reference #:— a,0-0./ --- 05-ta
Additional on pg.
GranteeI(s): City of Eftmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec--�a-e�Twn —]Kna
�Qt
OR Lot ----_Block --Plat
Assessor's Tax Parcel M#(s): (I
. t0l�Y?--00!5- (2)
----.Assemr1s Tax Parcel E10 not yet assigned
W B E R E A S, A,1 /// fi-/9 DA
are the owners of the following ilescribed real estate in the City of 'Edmonds, to wit:
Property
Legal Description
Assessor's Tax ParcelID W (s): 160 J-3 060 00-5-4001
AUTHORI,ZED'IFOR RECORMPING
C, of Edmonds
By:-1AZ1 Pat
Page of
WliEREAS, the above named owners are desirous Of imposing a restrictive
covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19-00.040 of the Edmdn . -
ds
Community Development Code. WITNESSETH, that for and I in
consideration o f the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and �grant to
the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to_�wit:
That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the �Grantors have agreed to the
Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for,multiple familv housing
may be erected on subject property -containing more than 12 . I
units.
Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate -and
their heirs, successors and assigns.
DATED this .,c>277 day of JkJA4 1-9t_22P
GRANTOR
GRANTOR
State of Washington
County of tNj . b) )ss
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1AqC9a"0
signed this instrument, on oath. stated that he/she was authorized to execute the
instrument and acknowledged it as the — VUID� —(title) of
TOPFeer( (name of party on behalf on whom instrument wag executed) to be
the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentions 'in this
instrument. "Subscribed and sworn to'before me this day.of ZOL-Y
C,
,-'rJ
e
N Notary Pu lic in and for tb� State of Washington.
T A 0;,
E
am. 0 � My commission expires 1-0-2010
S 0 PUBLIC
Z
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
OP City of Edmonds
By:_A%4� Date—w2w
Page ca of
L:\TEMPXBUELDING\FORMS\RES7'JUCT
CITY OF EDMONDS
(425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
. .... 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH -EDMONDS, WA98020 Website: wwwxi.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
C. 19
February 27, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
Thank you for meeting with Lyle Chrisman and me on February 26, 2003 to discuss the concerns
addressed in your letter of February 20, 2003. After discussing your concerns with you and your
brother, we summarized them into three primary issues, which I would like to address as follows:
1. You feel you were singled out and treated inqppropriately by Cily Engineering Division
staff during the plan review and inspection of your projec
Your allegations that Engineer Division staff singled you out and treated you in a
prejudicial and discriminatory manner are very serious allegations and are taken seriously
by the City. Please be assured that it is the City's policy to treat all developers in a
professional and consistent manner, as necessary to ensure compliance with applicable
codes and approved plans.
After reviewing your letter and your comments in our meeting, and looking into the
project history, I must take exception to your allegations. Although your project had
some site constraints that led to frustration for you in obtaining permit approvals, and
some inspections resulted in disapproval and re -inspection, I believe our staff acted in a
professional and consistent manner in our dealings with you.
Nonetheless, it is clear that you are quite passionate in your perception of your treatment
by Engineering Division staff. During our meeting, you agreed that there is nothing that
can be done to change any past actions. However, I assured you that I will counsel our
Engineering Division staff to make sure that we all have an appreciation for how our
actions and proceduresinay be perceived, and that we make sure that we deal with all
developers in a professional, consistent, and respectful manner.
2. You believe that the Edmonds Communily Development Code (ECDC) needs to be
revised so it can be uniformly and consistently applied.
We agree. It has been a number of years since the ECDC has had a major update, and
there are a number of areas where it could be clearer and easier to interpret. The
Development Services Director had planned to undertake the significant task of a major
Incorporated August 11, 1890
code update in 2003. Unfortunately, due to significant budget cuts this year, the City
Council was not able to approve the funding in the 2003 budget that the Development
Services Director requested, to accomplish this task.
Therefore, the best we can do for the foreseeable future is to continue to address and
clarify individual issues on a case by case basis. If you can provide us specific
recommendations to improve specific sections of the ECDC, that would be helpful and
.greatly appreciated.
3. You want Cily approval to not remove that asphalt "parking space" that we have directed
you to remove and replace with landscaping per the approved plans.
As we discussed, there are actually two corrections directed by Mr. Chrisman's letter of
January 24, 2003 that, as of our meeting, you had not completed. You were directed in
that letter to 1) remove the block wall from the City right of way, and 2) remove the
asphalt area in the front yard that could be used as a parking space and restore
landscaping per the approved plans.
During our meeting, you agreed to remove the block wall from the right of way.
Regarding the asphalt "parking space", you explained that you do not intend this to be a
parking space and that your intent is that it be a walkway extension from your previously
existing sidewalk.
As we agreed, you will submit a revised plan requesting City approval for a sidewalk
extension in this location. I explained to you that the City's concern is that this not be
later converted back to a paved area that could be used for parking because it does not
meet City standards and would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised
plan must include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to park a vehicle.
In other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example, the
landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the "parking space".
We are always working to improve our processes and procedures, and I thank you for providing
us your input.
Sincerel
DAVID K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Mayor Gary Haakenson
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
To: Mayor Gary Haakensons
City of Edmonds
To- Mr. David K. Gebert, PE
City of Edmonds
Dear Mr. Gebert,
FIECEFIViel)
MAR 10 2003
1
ENGINEERING D, VISION
RECEIVED
MAR 0 7 2003
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Thank you for meeting with my brother and I on February 26, 2003 to discuss the issues
that I presented to you attention on my letter dated February 20, 2003. 1 will comment to
same three primary issues that you summarize on your letter on February 27, 2003 below:
1. Even though you.have assured me on your letter and during the meeting that
the City Engineering Division "deal with all developers in a professional and
consistent, and respective manner", this has not been my personal experience.
I don't think it is helpful to dismiss my concerns as a personal feeling and not
acknowledge inconsistent or improper actions by the Engineering department
staff. I still clairn that Ms. Danielle Gilbert, City Engineering Division staff
Engineering inspector, has over step her authority to contact my brother and I
on Feb 18 and find her comments and warning to me during that call out of
line. Even though, I can't prove what she said to me over the call, I'll send
you a receipt from our cell phone carriers which will show the time and phone
number that her call originate from. Following her call, a notice was posted
on my property from the Building department within 48 hours. Her call was a
continuation of problems she presented to me over the course of her
inspections. I had difficultly with all of the inspections she performed. If you
review all other inspections perform on this.project, examples Building and
Fire, and take the time to talk to those inspectors you'll find all those
inspections we done without any difficulty. So, it is not right to dismiss the
problem as project constraint but rather acknowledge there is merit to my
claim and maybe Ms. Gilbert conduct through my and my project has not been
proper.
2. It is interesting that the only thing you did acknowledge during our meeting is
the necessity for major upgrade to ECDC code for which there are not
sufficient funds at this time. What I was hoping to hear is that you'll review
the engineering practices of Engineering Department. I agree the no code is
perfect, however, that doesn't take a way the requirement of good engineering
practice of consistent interpretation of existing code and timely response. It
took well over six months and number of register letters to get an approval for
the width of access road to the project. During this time, the Engineering
Department insisted on requiring an extra 2 times 'shy distance' width to the
access road that is not in the code. It took the intervention of senior
department engineer to drop this subjective requirement.
3. During the meeting we agreed to remove the block wall and we had already
done that. We stated the paved asphalt area in front was not a 'parking space'
as it is not big enough for this purpose. Also, we don't need to create an
additional parking space since we have ample parking both on and off the
property. We stated that we needed the paved area as a continuation to the
paved surface to the house. You agreed. We have lined the paved area with
stone blocks on both sides and added back landscaping. This should meet your
concern. Please see the revised plan.
/d /,mi
a
,�IZIO -3
L/33
S
4tical Areas Checklist
'Site Information (sd'ilsltdpography/hydrology/vegetation)
23rct k-Di"em, A
1. Site Address/14cation: go 2
-,:A
*,ee, 2.- -Property Tax Account.'Number.
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): ;2L
.4. U this Sitecuffently.developeV-�-_yes; I/ no.
If yes; how is site developed7._____________----L_.
0
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all diat apply.
P
Flat less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
V%
Rolling-, slopes on site generally less dun 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
I -filly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% a vertical rise
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
.Steep: grades of greater dian 30% present on site (a vertical nse of 19 ect over a
V,
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
'be):
Other (please descri
6. Site contains areas of year -found standing water: A10 Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Depth:
Approx.
What season(s) of the year?.
S. Site is fikhe floodway floodplain of a i�ati�r course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
roundT. Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?.
10. Site is primarily: forested ;meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shruhs etc)
I I.. Obvious wetland is present on site:
For City Staff Use Only
1. Site is Zoned?. 2.4
2-. SCS napped soil type(s)? -7R
3. Wedand inventory or C-A. map indicates wedand present on site?
4,;-�- :.-,Critical Areas inventory or C.A.-uiap indicates-Ciridcal Area on site?
5..;, within desijnaie� earthi subsidence landslide hazard area)
- Site des'�ignated on the Envimainentally Sensitive Ma07
METERMINATION
JDY-REOUIRED CONDMONALWAIVER
WA 'VIER
o '�7
1',� Reviemi�d by;
213196,
�-Manner: Date
j,
lt"AMM94
21"OR Z.
.7
x.
:J
4
K"
4
7.1
0. 1L 9
ty
40
".Ch'
c reas" eeklig t*
iiid-submit it ti� the d6r. 'ne'City will
Areas ileckllstdlantaindd_bn�
this ffirm is to be filled out by any person -review the die� 'make a precursory site
preparing a. -Development.. Permit j, 3A -U' i il� - f - -;;Visi4 and - make a determinaiion of the -
Application for the City of Edmonds pr1or", 'subsequerit steps necessary to &mplete a
to his/her submittal.of a. t ..'�,-�-�,71!,-�,�.-,j��develoPn=tPenhit2pplicafion.,;,,.
permit to the City.
With a *gned copy of this form, me
Thepuzpose of-theChecklist is to enable- applicant should also submit . a m I ap
City staff to determine whether any or plot plan-Uor individual lots of the parcel
potential Critical Areit we or may be . ..... with c=Th detail that City staff can find
presenton the subject propexty. ., lbe-,. and identify the sutject parcel(s)_ - In.
informati6i - n66ded to Complete the addition, the applicant shall lndude�
Chaddist should be easily ava-ibble from- bdier pertinent infonnation (e-g. site
observations of the-siteordatiavailabldair' topo'geaphy amp, i et�). orstudiei . in
City Hall (Critical Areas inveatofies� im;qn, iconjunction with this Checiffilst, to wsiA
or sail surveys)... P�Itf;"�;,_ZO 4
staff in completing their preliniinar'y,
_.,�assessrnent of the site.
An applicant,'br his/her representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it,
I have completed the attached Critical Area C-heck'list and a*ttest that the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/ Applicant: _','Appliaca nt . Re . P . resentative:
Name
*zio
-Ek�
Street Address
Street Address
V,
IM' 3�
z
City, State, ZIP Phon4:F City, State, ZIP. 'Phone
7
oe
Siiniture D Signature q
W,
g
. Jli
,DAZoneG 1/4, SEC. 29' T'.27N., RA W.M. 157
4,F 21 Z
0 �1000
r tion
1022
Zion -4
21014 — j 21OW
1031 A
2034 to"
00
21011
oil allay LM*
27�8 - r '4 � ft 0.
P.
-c r6i k
aw^Ws&. m �r 2110P
51
P AP 1136
rF
4i ST 212"w — s a w --44
1-4c 00
a ry
7SO7
94% - 201
7303
11111 W01 rLs 0 21102
21316
Z. PARk Rat; 21310
--FI-3—L7 JE�,� Loi
ILIZU
21,110S Z1324
z MAW
"AMOR f4jac 07
21420 1401 Z14"
2A 0 ST SW 2J+00
lwnraA"rio
lia .40 r&W
ixlr- 10
$1420
X 21511 2142S.
list 0 . 21411J 21429
k4 — e 9�
21520 215'210 @J
6,31 REY. a. a
21 will "Oftc 21500 STAN *90 "t
IS+
6
21527 6 21515
i A #'AVAAWS
*.W. ai6vw
%T W.
21 p
kn
It too
21660S zt600
2rmc
ik
BLUE
CROSS
027 FOODS
— 219'w-6 8
el 2 A 117
a2e -
A
A/a 6:5Lor 7-o-wl7l-loclse 0
C/
IV'eW C4,leo, 2�-,hc,,77o., 5�
o 0.
h - Pre
JY. Z71,'17';�-A:�Io,? rc--re Cts 7-e57-e,1=57-71*�il,�,? 6ee re 57 pie 54, ts)
IZ - u se F- 5 - 2- d e st" 7 z�7
C7
-fp,-A-
rL ro) 1 0-5 P- t, -rc, ^
100 7' , /.2 o/ �r Real-e c-/o Lj : 0 - 0 c XS /�f
11
U ;5e Z16 X 41 W " cl e X, 4,1 djoe,�o
jr.*6Ae P'
N6,-I - —
r . 88
So �
See
AM.
m
2/7/00
=-Oo
op's
Ahmadnia Building
Storm Drainage Report
2140573 rd Place West
Edmonds, WA
Portion of NWI/4, NWI/4, Section 2, Township 27 N. Range
4 East WM Snohomish County WA
MAR '2 2 2301
DVELOPV,S�!'f �'-�RVICES CTR-
CiTy OF EDjvj0&DS
I q 10 (
K*"
I EXPIRES C- - // ),Ql
Table of Contents
1. Introduction/General Information
2. Existing Site Hydrology/Upstream, Downstream Consideration
3. Proposed Site Hydrology
4. Storm Draining Calculator and Supporting Document
0
1. Introduction/General Information
The proposed project is located on lot 5, Luschen Tracts, Division No. 3, as per plat
recorded in volume 17 of plats, page 87, records of Snohomish County, WA. The site
address is 21405 73d place west Edmonds, WA. Existing site is approximately 11,520
SF. in area and contains an existing house located on west portion of site along 73 pl.
west. The project site is bounded to north, south, and east by existing lots and structures
and to the west by 73d place west.
Topography of site is sloping fromwest to east with approximate relief of 8 Ft. Existing
on site soil consists of gravely sandy loom and designated as hydraulic group c based on
Snohomish County soil survey.
The proposed project is to construct approximately 2,270 SF. of new building along with
parking and drive areas. It is also required to modify the existing residential structure to
provide fire access to project.
i
2. Existing Site Hydrology/Vpstream, Downstream
Consideration
Existing site consist of and 11,5 10 SF. of a parcel with and existing house along with it's
paved driveway to 73d place west. Site slopes from west to east with and an average
slope of 6%. Existing storm run off sheet flows from west to east and percolate to ground
along low portion of site along east property line. There is no storm drainage conveyance
downstream from site. An existing apartment complex is located to the East Side of
project with no storm run-off conveyance to this parcel.
There are no upstream drainage run-offs to this project site from adjacent properties.
Upstream drainage basin for this project is from areas to west of 73 d place west and
215th. SW. Storm drainage run-off from upstream areas is tight lined along 73 d place
west and bypasses the project site and drains toward south. Storm drainage run-off from
73 rd place west and upstream tributary area is tight lined and drains toward 216 th St. SW.
From here storm drainage system travels northerly along 216 1h St. SW and discharges to
Haliscreek. Due to the fact tat this project does not proposes to discharge any run-off to
this system, there will be no adverse impact to downstream conveyance system.
3. Proposed Site Hydrology
Storm drainage conveyance and discharge system for this project is designed in the same
manner to existing conditions. C & H Design performed a percolation test based on King
County surface water design manual and the result is included within this report. The
average measured percolation rate has been used with a factor of safety of 2 to size the
infiltration system. The storm drainage infiltration system is designed for 1 00yr/24hr
design using SBUH methodology and storm water management manual guide line. Please
prefer to the enclosed calculation.
0 0
. 4. Storm Drainage Calculation and Supporting Documents
2/4/00- 4:5:12- pm Shareware Release page 1
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: Al
NAME: 100YR/24HR POST-DEV.
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.14 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A
PERV
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN ....
0.00
TC ....
0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.09 cfs
VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
IMP
0.14 Acres
98.00
6.30 min
0 . 0
2/4/00 4:5:13 pm Shareware Release page 2
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1 0.021
340
1407 cf
0.14
2/4/'Ob 4:5:14 pm Shareware Release page 3
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST
STORAGE LIST ID No. 1
Description: 45X4X4 FEET TRENCH
2/4/00 4:5:15 pm Shareware Release page 4
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. 1
Description: 45X4X4 FEET TRENCH
STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- >
(ft) --- cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) --- Cf --- -- AC -Ft- (ft) --- cf--- --AC-Ft- (ft) --- Cf--- --AC-Ft-
84.00 0.0000 0.0000 85.30 78.000 0.0018 86.60 156.00 0.0036 87.90 234.00 0.0054
84.10 6.0000 0.0001 85.40 84.000 0.0019 86.70 162.00 0.0037 88.00 240.00 0.0055
84.20 12.000 0.0003 85.50 90-000 0.0021 86.80 168.00 0.0039 88.10 246.00 0.0056
84.30 18.000 0.0004 85.60 96.000 0.0022 86.90 174.00 0.0040 88.20 252.00 0.0058
84.40 24.000 0.0006 85.70 102.00 0.0023 87.00 180-00 0.0041 88.30 258.00 0.0059
84.50 30.000 0.0007 85.80 108-00 0.0025 87.10 186.00 0.0043 88.40 264.00 0.0061
84.60 36.000 0.0008 85.90 114.00 0.0026 87.20 192.00 0.0044 88.50 270.00 6.0062
84.70 42.000 0.0010 86.00 120.00 0.0028 87.30 198.00 0.0045 88.60 276.00 0.0063
84.80 48.000 0.0011 86.10 126.00 0.0029 87.40 204.00 0.0047 88.70 282.00 0.0065
84.90 54.000 0.0012 86.20 132.00 0.0030 87.50 210.00 0.0048 88.80 288.00 0.0066
85.00 60.000 0.0014 86.30 138.00 0.0032 87.60 216.00 0.0050 88.90 294.00 0.0067
85.10 66.000 0.0015 86.40 144.00 0.0033 87.70 222.00 0.0051 89:00 300.00 0.0069
85.20 72.000 0.0017 86.50 150-00 0.0034 87.80 228.00 0.0052 89.00 300.00 0.0069
��tv_k Q,
x%f
2/4/00 4:5:16 pm Shareware Release page 5
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST
DISCHARGE LIST ID No. 1
Description: INFILTRATION
�/4/00 4:5:17 pm Shareware Release page 6
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
DISCHARGE LIST ID No.. 1
Description: INFILTRATION
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- >
(ft) --- CfS -- ------- (ft) --- CfS -- ------- (ft) --- cfa -- ------- (ft) --- CfS -- -------
84.00 0.0210---/' =8--5-30-o-;2--1-0== ... =8-6 --- 6=7-0-02-1-0 ---- =87 --- 9-0--0-02-1=7 ---
84.10 0.0210 85.40 0.0210 86.70 0.0210 88.00 0.0210
84.20 0.0210 85.50 0.0210 86.80 0.0210 88.10 0.0210
84.30 0.0210 85.60 0.0210 86.96 0.0210 88.20 0.0210
84.40 0.0210 85.70 0.0210 87.00 0.0210 88.30 0.0210
84.50 0.0210 85.80 0.0210 87.10 0.0210 .88.40 0.0210
84-60 0.0210 85.90 0.0210 87.20 0.0210 88.50 0.0210
84.70 0.0210 86.00 0.0210 87.30 0.0210 88.60 0.0210
84.80 0.0210 86.10 0.0210 87.40 0.0210 88.70 0.0210
84.90 0.0210 86.20. 0.0210 87.50 0.0210 88.80 0.0210
85.00 0.0210 86.30 0.0210 87.60 0.0210 88.90 0.0210
85.10 0.0210 86.40 0.0210 87.70 0.0210 89.00 0.0210
85.20 0.0210 86.50 0.0210 87.80 0.0210 89.00 0.0210
2'/4/b6 .4:5:21 pm Shareware Release page 7
NASSER TOWNHOUSE
STORM DRINAGE CALCULATION
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> OUTFLOW STORAGE
< -------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id (cfe) VOL (cf)
.......... = ... — .... — .... = ........... = ...... — ........... = ........ === ... =.= .... ==
100YR/24HR ROUTING ........... 0.00 0.09 1 1 88.09 1 0.02 245.25 cf
. , �;no
KING. COUNTY, WASONGTON, SURFACE WATLODESIGN MANUAL
FIGURE 431B ROOF DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION SYSTEM
PLAN VIEW
NO SCALE
OBSERVATION PIPE 4r RIGID OR'15" FLEXIBLE
— — — — — PERFORATED PIPE
-----------------
ROOF
DRAIN
SUMP
INFILTRATION TRENCH W/SOLID LID
PROFILE VIEW
NO SCALE
OBSERVATI . ON PIPE--\ RIGID OR Ir FLEXIBLE SPLASH
/ PERFORATED PIPE
ir I
,ow
,ow
'00w ,ow
,00w
-- ------------
m- ::�Jj
0 a ' ' *2 211
WASHED ROCK IC:Rol- - 5.0' MIN
.-awo, — O:zp , I . I "
, , R-e I I If —3/4r
FINE
MESH MP W/
SCREEN Fo8uwjLID
—VMIES —10, Mir-1--i
A
OBSERVATION PIPE
4-15" PVC..PERF PIPE
COMPACT BACKFILL
C RIGID OR Ir FLEXIBLE
PERFORATED PIPE
WASHED ROCK
I llf-31,C
WRAP GRAVEL ENTIRELY
WITH FILTER FABRIC
lad
SECTION A
NO SCALE
4.S.1-5 11/04
Prol
Tax account I
C) iek-
13 r,
ke,
11
Moe,
:5/ 5- - 76
Ve ir 0- f-7�
SOIL PR%OFl LE
13� .47-
2.
4 7,
3. C9 _6
4.
5.
p
3 55-
q4
C7
�tw� 14P
V� Twt
A)oy4k'
Vi
4'04
4 s�"
2
44
4
4
P
4
4 R
FEED -4 Qj iii 4 4
�u
T) F
4
4
4
P
4 A!4 4
4100 1 z
-M
EIR OMe
4
MM
V)
4 Me
Sol
*ZZ-*t ja-+LD-
vWz
Izt
C/1--tt
M-11 W)
- N
0M
40
4
r)
iUE: NU WARRANTY OF ACCURACY. The information shown on th�
att:' hed map was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its employee,,,
a consultants. The City of Edmonds does not Warrant the accuracy of
anything set forth on the map. Any person or entity requesting a com,
should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information showr owtkn jo eb**e IJ
Ine map, including but not limited to, the location of any sewer s,;,.
sl'lfjwn. Such sewer stubs may or may not
exist and may or may nc- Z�200
J Ille location shown. Neither the C
ity of Edmonds nor its
L Off;,,gs st),-ji hi, !'21318 $OF !N8
1-1-6[QLIUII yvEn Oil this map, nuf lu:
ovided hased "9011 sPid ainn
I " 1 1
Son 'AMV,
L iowoo,
YN
32
valley
A
2 32
7H
51
78
pov.:�
78-
28
21
5
4� ..V 5
ir
-AA
9
M: 41
78
- � A AL - --- - . - I --- I
7
4"
lit
4
Soil survey
TABLE 15.--WATER FEATURES --Continued
I
High water table
3logicl
11
i
1
.�up Frequency 1 Duration
1 Months
1
Depth
1 Kind
I Months
lRare ------------ 1
Ft
2.0-4.0
lApparent
I 'Nov -Apr
3 !Rare ------------
1
>6.0
!Rare ------------
2.0-3.0
lApparent
Nov -Apr
lNone ------------ 1
1
1.5-3.0
tPerched
I Noi�_Msy:_
lNone ------------ 1
1
1.5-3.0
I'Perched
I Nov -ma
lNone ------------ I
I
>6.o
I
lNone; ------------- 1
1
1.5-3.0
Perched
.1 Nov*-N
lNone ------------ 1
1
>6.0
INone------.; ------ I
1.0-3.0
lPerched
I Nov"
*.None--7
--- : ------ 1
1
>6.0
.ap unit for composition and, behavior
'characteristics
of the map ulnW.�
Snohomish County Area, Washington
1E
TABLE 16---SOIL FEATURES
[The symbol > means more than. Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern]
—um ano
map symbol
D epth lHardness
t-eMented Ill
pan I ----
1. ---- � I
, :j: 11 1 1 . 1
i! I I 1 11 11 �e
-- *-�� Risk
a !Potentia.Li f c0rrFosion
!Initial!
Depth :
lHardness
Total I I
frost !Uncoated !Concrete
1 2, 3 -----------------
act on steel
ilderwood
>60
1 20-40 :Thin
4*:
ILow ------ Noderate
1 Noderate.
#
Alderwood --------------
>60
20-40 1T hin 1
I
Everett ---------------- 11
>60
1
--- 1 --- ILow ------ Noderate IModerate.
5 f, 6
Alderwood --------------
--- !Low I
------ Noderate IModerate.
>60
20-40 !Thin
Urban land.
lLow ------ Noderate Moderate.
f
7 ---------------------
>60
I
I
I
Bellingham.
lLow I
Migh ----- lModer,t6.
8 -----------------------
>60
I
Bellingham Variant
I I
--- !High ----- fHigh
9 10, 11 ---------------
>60
----- lHigh.
theart
--- Mow ------ lHigh -----
120.
IModerate.
Cryohemists
13 ----------------------1
Custer
>60
N�_ 14 ----------------
!Low------ Noderate lHigh.
I
.1� ------ I
Elwell
>60
20-40 I'Thin
I I
--- lHigh-___lHigh ----- lHigh.
E I we 11 -----------------a
Y MA
>60
..
L�i-�.-olomount------------
20-40 IThin
--- !High ----- lHigh
20-40 lHard
----- [High.
I
--- lNoderate tHigh ----- lHigh.
el i --------------
>60
20-40 IThin I
lomount --------------- 20-40
I
lHard
lHigh ----- lftgh� ---- lHigh.
Oak outcrop.
Moderate !High -----!High.
19 -------------->60
f
lLow ------ Noderat I
e IModerate.
�XPUVaquents
--------------------- 1 >60
Rtl�ld
MAO __ itchell
1 20-40 Thin
!High ----- 'High
----- Migh.
-TABLE .15:._-WAfER FEATURES-. -Continued
00 ng
troup I Frequency
Duration I Month3
son
Sriof� Cm* Area. Washington
7 ;.;Water
Depth.�-J.. Kind-.- -.1.kon
.-C
1 1.56-3.0 IPerched
NOV44
-A I None — — -----
1 >6. o
'C,
f 1.5- .5 Per-ched
C-' ANone
-T 1 1.5 !.IP
A
'-3 e"hed-t
N0,11,
�6. 0.
�C'
n2.5,APerched.:r____7
1 5'
7A�
> .0
'1 6
>6 0'
T..
'.5 1p,
-;*1'-0' IA pparen t
AL
Nq+_n4a--'-"-I-
> .0
.6
Noe".;"
.>6.0
>6. 0'
I No6 -- -------- I
1
+ -1.0 JApparent
'I.None -----
1
+1-1.0 JApparent
TABLE.A �;m--VATER FEATURES-�;Contlnued
'Fro—Oarfi-I I H isth water table
d + + , -.d+ :
oil name an ky rolokle'l
Map 3ymbol -'gr ou p I -Frequency,+..I- Duration I+Month3 I .:Depth.- I Kind -I'Mon'ths
4 3*:
it
Olomount
C
1 1.5-3.5 IPerched I Nov -may
C
None ----- — --
1. 5-3 1 Perched I. No"Jun
Rook outcrop.
44
D
I None----'�' I
+1 1'
-0 1400r4ft
.1.11i A. - . I'Nd*-Kar
Oreas 777
..:. ... . - I
F 45
030 V
C
INone --------
5 -3.0 1 Peiihed' Nov -May
A _46*:
A-
C
I None�-"---m-� I
Perc ed�
C'
I None--
1 1-.5-3.0'. 1 PeOched'-::-, -Dejc-4 ay
iol� - �;'i�rop.�
'48 49
.�Pastlkl
INone
Perched,
50_�
Ike
AFrequent-�� IL ng
0
-;A 0
;Nov pr,� ov4m pr.
�PlU'.
2'
0 i I.,XT j
None.
-N+
30
.........
Potch
N 0
otchub
:"T
.OU c
Puget,
C
lRare ---------- — -
Ir ', . 1. )': +
.0 1 A
1'.2.0�4 parent.:+ Nov -Apr
- - - --------
Puyallup ------ I
B
I Re re ........
1 >6.0
'58 ---- �-; -------------
A
ne----
INo +
1 >6.0'
agnar
�7
T
1w
77
4P W",
MD,'No
Z '777
CJu . .........
ON
'-,APPLICATI
or
TZ
StWEEL FEILMWI�
EASEMKNT No . ......... . .....
SIME
'pf'Ednf0W 5_�"l',-"'�.'f'.'-.. REPAIRS 0
Yne iNSIDE [I
OUTSIDE 0
A, H;Rj61IT N
.. 6...a p
ij 7h ..... ...
ONTR
'i� —
- -, �_ _" - ' - - " ", " 1 ' AcroR
2e
..................... c
6rb - ....... ...
. ......... . - 6 / BLk?CK No . ............................. ......
- . . A STREET
... ....... .
... ...... .. ...
0. . .. .......
...... .... ........
AVENUE LOT N
... ... ......... .... ... ........ ....................................................
0 ..
-HOUSE N )_ I ........ 7x� ............
NAME. ADD.
'(85
CT� 17
WPM
BLISM
:7
Approved -
Date -
.......... .
DEpOSIT, ......................
...........
TO* '-�46w;
S iorET ADDRESS FILE
TI%L.
APPROVED
UG 24 1964
. .............. ............
M
APPLICATION
ZZA
lor:
is SIDE SENVER FERWT
C ty. .6ioil
V, OU TSIDE INSIDE [_j REPAIRS
®R
8-3
CA" No. ......... . .........
..................
EASEMENT No . ............ : .........................
4 /,0
CONTRACTOR ..... No
O*WkR
4�
TREET
AVENUEWT No . ...................................................................... BLOCK No . ...............................................
116USE No., ....... .. ............... ................
AJ)
NAME ADD . ............................... .............................................. ..........
............. ............ ....................
_NL
STREET
ADDRESS �IU
a
Date
Approved:
........... .......
WoIik OrDER I-S'SUEE .......
DEPOSIT
iL'-,MR-.WpRk ORDER ISSUED ......
IVW
e
.7
6
Z
z z
ul
0:
P-4
z
0
T,
0 0
al
gL E-4
9L w N
z
0 E-4
0
VI
c
0
E
UA
0 n<;
z
0
c
KIOTI CE, NO WARRAWY OF ACCU . RAcy The Inform2tit,-)
the
he Clby of Ed7c--
The City of Edmonds does not, warr
forth or; the Map. Any Of
person or entity c "
"'Y
V indetlendent Inquiry regarding the IN
but not limited to, the locattion 0
S'a
bsmaYormaynote)dstandm
a r rn c
Nolither the City of Edmon
ds n tp
liab!3 fc! the information give - '� or
I nor for &ny Ord
,auo,,, Provided based upon said rn
01
�A.
0
E;
H
U2
0
0
4J
4
I
0
w
C4
0
CITY OF EDMONDS Can pRospect 6-1107 when work
CIVIC CENTER —WATER-SK ER DEPARXIV-1— is ready for Inspection- %-o —
tions, Saturday, Sunday or holidays.)
5 SEWER PERMIT
-E-
< 851 - 27th Place.South ........... ................................ ............... ...... ............... ....................................
ADDRkSS................................................................ ..... .........
a --.t* -Aorth .. ZrId .. 5 r
OWN"E'If, ..... Robert --- I.-Hugh"s ---------------------------- - ------------- CONTRACTOR _epti-c ... Tank ...... Q.& ..........
^F-4ECT a side sewer
�—. is granted -------- August ..... 2-4 ........... 19.64., for ....... ------------ days, to REPAIR or CONN
Peroussion cation on file and governing ordinances.
ASewers in accordance with appli
"It4city
A C ^-- IS CA-LLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
TMENTION y obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
NOTE No. I —The owners of the property ma: street area- Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.
be employed to construct side sewer in
NOTE No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 Inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%.
No bends in grade sharper than 'A will be permitted.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
It than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or Its aP
NOTE No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other wor
purtenances except to insert the pipe into the wye.
1.11 C. 18 9,3
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
September 1, 2004
Mr. Hossein Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W, Non -Compliant Parking Space
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
sm"()
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
This is in response to your letter dated August 27, 2004. On August 11, 2004, 1
personally observed the vehicle parking in the asphalt area in the front of your property at
21507 73d Place West while I happened to be passing through your neighborhood for
another purpose. Not only did I observe the parked vehicle, but I also observed that the
approved 6 foot wide asphalt walkway had been widened to well over the approved 6
foot width by removing some of the landscaping, relocating the concrete blocks, and
exposing additional asphalt. As a result, my letter dated August 12, 2004 directed you to
correct the situation.
Your letter indicates that, as of August 27, 2004, the asphalt had, been removed.
However, at that time, the extent of the asphalt removed was insufficient, the remaining
asphalt was still in excess of 8 feet wide, and the concrete blocks needed to be relocated
after completion of the additional asphalt removal. Lyle Chrisman and I both spoke to
Mr. Hauck on August 27 and explained the additional asphalt removal required and the
extent to which the blocks needed to be relocated.
The voice mail that you left for me on August 27, 2004 did not leave a phone number. I
tried to call you on the phone number we had on file, but it appeared to be a fax number.
So, I sent the enclosed e-mail to respond to your voice mail.
On Monday morning, August 30, 2004,. Lyle and I inspected the walkway and determined
that additional asphalt had been removed over the weekend, and that the extent of asphalt
removal and relocation of concrete blocks was acceptable. The enclosed photographs
indicate the approved width of walkway asphalt and location of concrete blocks. As
indicated in these photographs, which were taken on September 1, 2004, the restoration
of landscaping remains to be completed. However, since the asphalt width has been
reduced to the approved 6 foot width and the concrete blocks have been relocated, we do
not intend to pursue enforcement action, civil fines or penalties at this time.
Incorporated August 11, 1890
T T I - T
If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman or me at 425 7710220.
Sincerely,
D K GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
Mike Thies, Code Enforcement
I . I . 0 0
Gebert, David
From: Gebert, David
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:12 PM
To: 'ahmadnia@yahoo.com'
Cc: Chrisman, Lyle -
Subject: Walkway/parking at 21507 73rd PL W
Mr. Ahmadnia,
I received your voice mail today, but you did not leave me a phone number for me to return your call.
I was with Lyle this morning when he inspected the walkway in front of your property at 21507 73rd PI W. Although some
of the asphalt walkway has been removed, not enough has been removed to comply with our directions.
Please refer to my letter dated August 12, 2004, which states that..."you must physically remove any asphalt that exceeds
the approved 6 foot walkway width and restore the concrete blocks and landscaping to a permanent configuration that
precludes the area from being easily changed back again to a parking space. In addition, ....the concrete blocks lining the
6 foot walkway must be outside the City right-of-way."
During our inspection this morning, we observed that the width of the asphalt is still in excess of 8 feet wide. It must be no
wider that 6 feet wide. Any asphalt that exceeds 6 feet in width must be removed.
Dave Gebert
City Engineer
�t.4 C. 1 S () �)
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 * FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: ww�mdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
August 12, 2004
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115 '
RE: Property it 2 i �07 1P -'Place W, Non -Compliant Parking Space.
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
On August 11, 2004, we observed a vehicle parked in a non -compliant parking space on
your property at 21507 73rd Place West in Edmonds. Please see the enclosed photograph'.
On March 3, 2003, you were issued a correction notice for your development project at
this location pertaining to the asphalt area in the front yard that, if left in its configuration
at that time, could have been used as a non -compliant parking space. The correction
notice required that you submit a revised plan requesting City approval for a walkway
extension from the previously existing sidewalk or remove the asphalt area in the front
yard that could be used as a non -compliant parking space, and restore landscaping per the
approved plans.
On March 7, 2003 we received a revised plan from you showing a 6 foot wide asphalt
walkway extending from your previously existing concrete sidewalk to the new asphalt
driveway on the south side of your property. My letter to you dated March 12, 2003
advised you that, although the configuration of the proposed asphalt walkway was
acceptable, we could not approve it because you had not addressed the City's concern
identified to you in previgus correspondence, specifically:
".'..the City's concern is that this not be later converted back to a paved area that
could be used for parking because it does not meet City standards and would not
be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised plan must include
permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will preclude it from
being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to park a vehicle. In other
words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example, the
landscapi ng cannot simply be removed again to restore the 'parking space'."
Your letter dated March 18, 2004 stated that "...the area in question was never intended
to be a parking stall and was never used for parking." You further stated that the City
"...can continue to monitor for changes and issue a violation if we make any changes.
Incorporated August 11, 1890,0
.Ri0pr (-Ifij - HoWnAn I;Nnnn
The changes that I had made cannot easily be undone and you have my assurance that no
changes will be made following your approval of current plan."
Based upon your written assurances that no changes would be made from the'revised plan
submitted with your letter of March,7, . 2003 subsequent to our approval, and that your
proposed plan would be'pennanent, my letter dated March 25, 2003 approved your
proposed 6 foot wide asphalt walkway, lined with concrete block units and extending
from your previously existing concrete sidewalk to the new asphalt driveway on the south
side of your property.
Unfortunately, as noted above, we have now observed that your approved plan has indeed
been changed and the asphalt area in question is now, in fact, being used for a parking
space. This parking space does not meet City standards and is not safe for parking a
vehicle. Accordingly, we have no choice but to direct you to restore this area to the 6
foot Wide walkway as approved by my letter,dated March 25, 2003. In restoring the area
to the approved walkway configuration, you must physically remove any asphalt that
exceeds the approved 6 foot walkway width and restore the concrete blocks and
landscaping to a permanent configuration that precludes this area from being easily
changed back again to a parking space. In addition, I must remind you that the concrete
blocks lining the 6 foot walkway must be outside the City right-of-way.
You must complete the work to, restore this area to the approved 6 foot wide walkway
configuration by Friday, August 27, 2004. If you do not complete the directed restoration
by that date, the City will pursue enforcement action, which may include but not be
limited to civil fines and penalties.
If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrism�n or me at 425 7710220.
Sincerely,
DAVID K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
Mike Thies, Code Enforcement
AM,
sw
boo-
41
Iz: :,77
I AV
All
-'-'? C. i sq'*J
AD
CITY OF EPMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
. Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 17, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
The City of Edmonds, Engineering Division, has been advised by our Public Works
Department that a water valve installed with the development of this property was buried
in the sidewalk. The water valve was installed by the City of Edmonds at the time
individual water services were provided to the lot. The sidewalk was subsequently
constructed over the water valve by your development project. The water valve must be
accessible and operational at all times.
The City is requesting that you expose the water valve and raise it to the grade of the
sidewalk. You'will be required to remove the panel of sidewalk in which the water valve
falls and then re -pour the concrete sidewalk panel once complete. The City of Edmonds
Public Works Department has marked the approximate location of this valve in blue spray
paint on the sidewalk.
Please bring the water valve to grade or provide the City with a reasonable timeframe in
which the work has been scheduled to be complete, by December 18, 2003. If the work is
not complete as specified, the Public Works Department will be forced to perform the
work and you will be billed accordingly for time and materials, or the City will attach your
bond. I
Your cooperation in bringing the water valve to grade so it is accessible is appreciated.
Please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220, ext 1328 with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Jeanie McConnell
Engineering Technician
Jrn
ott Highland
;'-ttleet file
Incorporated August 11, 1890
000,-, -T . X.
6, ml��
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwici.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
"i Planning - Building Engineering
March 25, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 d Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
We have received your letter dated March 18, 2003.
�V7
GAPY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
First, let me clarify that, during our meeting on February 26,2003, 1 did not agree that the paved
area did not have to be removed. What we did agree was that you would submit revised plans
requesting City approval of a sidewalk extension in this location.
i -
I also advised you that your revised plan must include permanent changes to the existing asphalt
and features that will preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to
park a vehicle; in other words, that prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example,
the landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the "parking space".
We do not agree that your revised plan meets these criteria. Although the concrete blocks which
y ou have placed on top of the asphalt pavement to delineate a walkway may be heavy, they can
still be removed without difficulty to once again expose the paved area that is now covered by the
blocks and landscaping bark.
However, based upon your written assurances that no changes will be made from the revised plan
submitted with your letter of March 7, 2003 subsequent to our approval, and that your proposed
plan will be permanent, your proposed 6 foot wide asphalt walkway, lined with concrete block
units and extending from your previously existing concrete sidewalk to the new asphalt driveway
on the south side of your property, is approved.
DA—VID K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
Incorporated August 11, J 890
0
Date: March 18, 2003
From: Nasser Ahmadnia
To: David Gebert
City of Edmonds
1215' Ave North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Cc: Development Services Department
Permit Coordinator
121 5' Ave North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: 21505 73rd PI. W, Edmonds
Dear Mr. Gebert:
4A
This is a reply to your letter dated March 12, 2003. 1 am currently out of United States and will return
on April 28, 2003. 1 am sending you this response via email and will also send it to my nephew and
ask him to mail you a copy of this letter via register mail.
On March 7, 1 delivered a letter along with a revised plan for the area in question. As we had agreed in
our meeting the wall along the sidewalk was removed. You had agreed that the paved area did not
have to be removed as we stressed the need to have a paved access to the existing walkway to the
house. The plan I submitted, and the modification to the area, shows a paved pathway lined with over
40 stoned blocks (50 lb each) that is six feet wide and twelve feet long. The existing pathway is not
big enough for parking stall. In my plan, I forgot to highlight the length of the pathway. I stress again,
the area in question was never intended to be a parking stall and was never used for parking. The
length of the pathway (12 feet) prohibits it to be use as a parking stall. Also, the changes that I made
will make it very difficult for anyone to park there. You can continue to monitor for changes and issue
a violation if we make any changes. Other than that, I am not sure that I can offer to do. The changes
that I had made cannot easily be tindone and you have my assurance that no changes will be made
following your approval of current plan. Given the level of difficulty with this project, I feel that'some
good faith on your part is prudent.
Since I am currently out of state, please forward your reply via email to the following email area:
. If any action is required, please keep in mind that I will not be back in United ahmadnia0vahoo.com
States until April 28, 2003.
Sincerely yours,
Nasser Ahmadnia.
1VA%100ar,v; Page I of 2
0
.Graf, Jeannine
From: Gebert, David
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Bowman, Duane; Bullock, Steve; Graf, Jeannine; Chrisman, Lyle;. Gilbert, Danielle
Subject: FW: Order to Correct Violation
Attached, for info, is the Nasser Ahmadnia letter to which my draft responds.
Have a great weekend.
Dave
--7--Original Message -----
From: Nasser Ahmadnia (mailto:ahmadnia@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:52 AM
To: Gebert, David
Subject: Re: Order to Correct Violation
Mr. Gebert,
I am currently out of United States and will return on April 28, 2003. 1 have attached a lette . r to this
email as a reply to your letter on March 12. Please acknowledge receipt of this email via areply.
Sincerely,
Nasser Ahmadnia
"Gebert, David" <Geberi@cLedmonds.waus> wrote:
Mr. Ahmadnia,
You will be receiving in the mail an Order to Correct Violation (OTC) dated March 10, 2003. Please
disregard it. It was issued in error and has been cancelled.
The Building Official issued the OTC because we were not aware at the time that you had submitted a
revised plan. When you brought in your revised plans on Friday March 7, 2003, you gave it to the
receptionist and did not indicate that it was a revised submittal. Therefore, it was not submitted to the
Permit Coordinators who are responsible for tracking all permit actions. Thus, neither the Building
Official nor I were aware that you had submitted your revised plans until after the OTC was issued. We
apologize for any confusion.
We will review your revised plan andprovide you a response.
Dave Gebert
City Engineer
City of Edmonds
Do you Yahoo!?
3/21/2003
14,C. 1 sc),3
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
March 12, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73'd Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
We have received your letter dated February 7, 2003. We believe you intended to date
your letter March 7, 2003, because it was received in our Development Services
Department on March 7, 2003 and in our Engineering Division on March 10, 2003.i The'
q
following is our response to the three specific numbered items in your letter:
1. My letter of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. In that letter I advised you
of the action I intend to take. I have no further response.
2. My letter of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. I have not further
response.
3. We have reviewed the revised plan submitted with your letter for a 6 foot wide
asphalt walkway extending from your existing concrete sidewalk to the new
asphalt driveway on the south side of your property. The configigation of the
proposed asphalt walkway is acceptable. However, we cannot yet approve it
because your submittal does.not address the City's concern identified in my letter
to you of February 27, 2003. Specifically, my letter stated that:
"...the City's concern is that this not be later converted back to a paved area
that could be used for parking because it does not meet City standards and
would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised plan must
include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to
park a vehicle. In other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that,
for example, the landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the
'parking space'."
Please submit, by explanation of how your revised
plan provides the City "suc*a"ssurAancAes.&P
Incorporat,ed August 11, 1890
The deadline for completion of the actions required by the Correction Notice issued on
March 3, 2003, is hereby extended to March 21, 2003. Failure to respond by this date
may result in issuance of an Order to Correct Violation.
When you bring your submittal in to City Hall, please be sure to submit it to a
Development Services Department Permit Coordinator so that it will be properly received
and tracked for plan review.
Sincerel
DAVID K GEBERT, PE
City,Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development. Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
(P NOTIC
TO PERA41TTEE AND/OR OWNER
1�st wisv3
DO NOT REMOVE
El PARTIAL APPROVAL 0 CORRECTON REQUIRED ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION
OwneA�m, A6m64idvM,,C,- Permit Number
Job Address I) Site Contact
WORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED
APPROVED PLANS AND JOB CARD MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE
CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE
OF WORK IS STARTED
RECALL FOR INSPECTION, El $45 REINSPECTION FEE MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO INSPECTION REQUEST
0 STOP WORK -UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR
L3 NO PERmrr-sTop WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK'COMPLY WITH
ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES
f
nroVot r
vi C& ck)Q�n k'K4,A C, I (J,-% �ro TY) P ru qCJ4 C,� [4� (k
—Or remoV,& 1L GusekeR lyze. in 4L� fron-f- tLa�A 4�+
4,U ufesl'ua!� nAioj, p6-cJed on 9-1jejo3.
Sv
THE AC71ONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REOUIRED TO BE CORRECTED.. W4UHN
CALENDAR DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220
T T—
Building Planning 10 Engineering El Fire 13 Public Works
I WL
3
White: Permit File PinL- Enforcement . I Buff.- Applicant
-1-0 C. 18 9 "'J
9
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwxi.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning * Building - Engineering
February 27, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73d Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
71bank you for meeting with Lyle Chrisman and me on February 26, 2003 to discuss the concerns
addressed in your letter of February 20, 2003. After discussing your concems with you and your
brother, we summarized them into three primary issues, which I would like to address as f6llows:
1. You feel vou were singled out and treated ingpprglLnately by City Engineering Division
staff during the plan review and inspection of your Rrojec
Your allegations that Engineer Division staff singled you out and treated you in a
prejudicial and discriminatory manner are very serious allegations and are taken seriously
by the City. Please be assured that it is the City's policy to treat all developers in a
professional and consistent manner, as necessary to ensure compliance with applicable
codes and approved plans.
After reviewing your letter and your comments in our meeting, and looking into the
project history, I must take exception to your allegations. Although your project had
some site constraints that led to frustration for you in obtaining permit approvals, and
some inspections resulted in disapproval and re -inspection, I believe our staff acted in a
professional and consistent manner in our dealings with you.'
Nonetheless, it is clear that you are quite passionate in your perception of your treatment
by Engineering Division staff. During our meeting, you agreed that there is nothing that
can be done to change any past actions. However, I assured you that I will counsel our
Engineering Division staff to make sure that we all have an appreciation for how our
actions and procedures may be perceived, and that we make sure that we deal with.all
developers in a professional, consistent, and respectful manner.
2. You believe that the Edmonds Community Develojpment Code (ECDC) needs to e
revised so it can be uniformly and consistently a0lied.
We agree. It has been a number of years since the ECDC has had a major update, and
there are a number of areas where it could be clearer and easier to interpret. The.
Development Services Director had planned to undertake the significant task of a major
Incorporated August 11, 1890
1-:- t-J -I.: - T----
code update in 2003. Unfortunately, due to significant budget cuts this year, the City
Council was not able to approve the funding in the 2003 budget that the Development
Services Director requested to accomplish this task.
Therefore, the best we can do for the foreseeable future is to continue to address and
clarify individual issues on a case by case basis. if you can provide us specific
recommendations to improve specific sections of the ECDC, that would be helpful and
g . reatly appreciated.
3. You want Ci a roval to not remove that amhn1t "narking -0" +'k.4 cted
with landscapin Dertheyn, Qygdplans.
As we discussed, there are actually two corrections directed by Mr. Chrisman's letter of
January 24, 2003 that, as of our meeting, you had not completed. You were directed in
that letter to 1) remove the block wall from the City right of way, and 2) remove the
asphalt area in the front yard that could be used as a parking space and restore
landscaping per the approved plans.
During our meeting, you agreed to remove the block wall from the right of way.
Regarding the asphalt "parking space", you explained that you do not intend this to be a
parking space and that your intent is that it be a walkway extension from your previously
existing sidewalk.
As we agreed, you will - submit a revised plan requesting City approval for a sidewalk
extension in this location. I explained to you that the City's concern is that this not be
later converted back to a paved area that could be used for parking because it does not
meet City standards and would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your revised
plan must include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to park a vehicle.
in other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that, for example, the
landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the "parking space".
We are always working to improve our processes and procedures, and I thank you for I providing
us your input.
S incerel, -
DAVID K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Mayor Gary Haakenson
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
OV . r, JU
0
NOTIC
TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER
DO NOT REMOVE 0"
PARTIAL APPROVAL CORRECTON REQUIRED &ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION
Owner /Ps-r/)�t Alwavllf Permit Number— /1/0/ v le
Job Address— 773 AK W —Site Contact -
El WORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED
APPROVED PLANS AND JOB CARD MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE
CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE
OF WORK IS STARTED
RECALL FOR INSPECTION $45 REINSPECTION FEE MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO INSPECTION REQUEST
STOP WORK -UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR
NO PERMIT -STOP WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK'COMPLY WITH
ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES
��nnxe 1194blo, 4xeo A41141#
THE AC`nONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO BE CORRECTED WITHIN
_/0 CALENDAR DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPEC-HON CALL 425-771-0220
t , Building 13 Planning L3 Engineering 0 Fire El Public Works
1; 7-/ 1- Z9—?
White: Permit File Pink. Enforcement Buff. Applicant
it? C. 1 S911
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
March 12, 2003
Mr. Nasser Ahmadnia
433 NE Ravenna Blvd
Seattle, WA 98115
RE: Property at 21507 73 rd Place W
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
We have received your letter dated February 7, 2003. We believe you intended to date
your letter March 7, 2003, because it was received in our Development Services
Department on March 7, 2003 and in our Engineering Division on March 10, 2003. The
following is our response to the three specific numbered items in your letter:
1. My letter of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. In that letter I advised you
of the action I intend to take. I have no further response.
2. My letter of February 27, 2003 responded to this item. I have not further
response.
3. We have reviewed the revised plan submitted with your letter for a 6 foot wide
asphalt walkway extending from your existing concrete sidewalk to the new
asphalt driveway on the south side of your property. The confi"—ration of the
proposed asphalt walkway is acceptable. However, we cannot yet approve it
because your submittal does not address the City's concern identified in my letter
to you of February 27, 2003. Specifically, my letter stated that:
"...the City's concern is that this not be later converted back to a paved area
that could be used for parking because it does not meet City standards and
would not be safe for parking a vehicle. Therefore, your. revised plan must
include permanent changes to the existing asphalt and features that will
preclude it from being easily restored to a paved area that could be used to
park a vehicle. In other words, prior to our approval, we must be assured that,
for example, the landscaping cannot simply be removed again to restore the
'parking space'."
Please submit, by Friday, March 21, 2003, an explanation of how your revised
plan provides the City such assurances.
Incorporated AugUst 11, 1890
q;c+.r (-;+ii - 14otzin�%n TAn;%n
The deadline for completion of the actions required by the Correction Notice issued on
March 3, 2003, is hereby extended to March 21, 2003. Failure to respond by this date
may result in issuance of an Order to Correct Violation.
When you bring your submittal in to City Hall, please be sure to submit it to a
Development Services Department Perrhit Coordinator so that it will be properly received
and tracked for plan review.
Sincerel
DAVID YL GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Steve Bullock, Senior Planner
(C)
Date: Feb 20, 2003
To: Mayor Gary Haakenson
City of Edmonds
To:� Mr.7rDavid::K. Gebert.;7:,-
City of Edmonds
Regarding: Property at 21507 73rd Pl. W
Edmonds, WA 98037
Dear Sirs,
FEB 2 1 2003
DEVELOPmENT SERVICES
I am writing you regarding my latest issue with one of your inspectors and want to share
with you my very difficult experience with the Engineering Division and Engineering
Inspection department over the course of my construction project in Edmonds. I own and
have been involved in the construction of three town homes addition to my property at
21505 73rd Pl. W.
I want to ask you a simple question? Would you as professional individual tolerate name
calling and insult by a city inspector? This is the experience that I had last Tuesday
4;
morning (February 18 around 8:30am) with Ms. Danielle Gilbert (Engineering inspector)
,i
who called me after calling my brother to get my mobile number. During the call, Ms.
6ft called me "stupid'_'and stated that "if you think that we are not watching you, you
are being- stupid"'- F611_6wing the phone call, I visited the city of Edmonds, to inquiry
about her and find out -about her supervisor's name. On the same day, she had contacted
zz�,
the planning department, a different department from where she works, and had them
"landscaping
z 1ZIe
P ost a notice of enforcement violation on my property stating removed to
4;
accommodate additional parking space. Remove parking spaces and restore landscaping."
The space in question is not big enough to accommodate a car. Also, as.you can see from
the drawings the landscaping had to be changed to allow access to the existing sidewalk
to the house on the property. Without this access, you had to walk over the grass to get to
the existing sidewalk which is not proper.
My problems with Ms. Gilbert are not recent issue. From her first encounter toward me
tie, ,V1
,2.d ,, and my project I can only conclude that she has prejudices toward me. It is my request to
w-jj._.�r you to have her stop harassing me and have her avoid making phone calls to me. I found
WIA� her phone call to me very upsetting and offending. And I found her comment "if you
think that we are not watching you, you are being stupid" to imply that city of Edmonds
have too much resources and can spare inspectors to keep an eye just on us.
If you see my project, you would be proud to have this project insuch a location, where
on both north and south of my project there are very dense apartment buildings. I believe
we have build the only side walk on the street. If you continue on this sidewalk in front of
the house you'll immediately walk into the electrical post and wiring tensioners.
Here is some my past encounters with Ms. Gilbert which leads me to believe she has a
personal issue with me and my project.
I got a permit for my project issued by the City of Edmonds on July 13, 2000. At that
time, the city of Edmonds had told me that I would be able to renew my permit for
another year. One month prior to expiration of my permit, June 2001, 1 went to renew
my permit and at that time I was told that I have to complete at least one inspection
before I could renew my permit.
My first experience with Ms. Gilbert was when she came onto the job site with Mr.
Michael Snook (building inspector) for per -construction meeting. She made a comment
that the set of plans that I present her was not legitimate approved site plans and she had
to call to verify my original plans. She stated that her visit did not count as an inspection
and she refused to sign the inspection card. We continue to do site development. Next, we 44.
installed 80 feet 8" side sewer with a manhole. Again, she came out and i nspected the
work but refused to sign the inspection card. Then on 7/9/02, we installed detention
system and called for inspection again. This time we got lucky and got a different
inspector. That inspector came out inspected the detention system and we got the first
signature on our inspection card, what we needed to renew our permit. Again, on another
occasion 7/18/02, we called for inspection of water line from the street to the new
building site. This time neither I nor my contractor (John Spencer) were at the site,
however, my contractor's son was there. At that occasion Ms. Gilbert comes to the site
and notices that the contractor did not have copper wire around the water line and she
comments to my contractor's son, that she is very made at me and I (Nasser) should have
know better. Why does she exhibit such behavior? I ask you is this type of treatment that
people building in Edmonds should expect? I must tell you that I have heard in numerous
occasions that builders avoid building in. -Edmonds because of similar -treatments that I
have encountered.
In numerous occasions I had called for inspection and Ms. Gilbert had either not showed
up for inspection or failed to re -schedule. Overall I had a total of 7 inspections required
by Engineering Department (Ms. Gilbert) and all of them were challenging and frankly
nightmarish. In contrast, I had, 16-17 building inspection done by the Building
Department by Mr. Michael Snook and all of these inspections were pleasant
experiences. In fact, Mr. Michael Snook encouraged my to build again in City of
Edmonds which I'll never do. Also, my Fire and Planning inspections were completed
very professionally.
My problems with the Engineering department goes back to Mr. Lyle Chrisman,
Development Services Engineer, reviewing of my project where he insisted on enforcing
an non -existing set back called "shy distance". It toke six months and may registered
letters to get a reply and finally Mr. Gerbert had to step in to resolve this matter.
I would like your office to look into this discriminatory behavior and reply within 7 days
to my letter'since I only have 10 days to reply to the Notice I received from city of
Edmonds.
Regards,
Nasser, Ah M Zadam
-1-4 C. 18 91,
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH "ENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 21,2002
H ossein Ahmadnia
122 NE 158th St
Seattle, Wa 98155
Re: Request for Address Change
Dear Mr. Ahmadnia;
C�
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
This letter is to inform you that your request for an address change has been .
granted. The old address Of 21405 73rd P1 W is nOW 21507 73rd P1 W and
21407 73rd P1 W is now 21505 73rd PI W. This may seem confusing at first
but the numbers must get smaller as they go north SO 21507 must be south of
21505. 1 will inform all City Divisions including Fire, Police, Utility Billing, Public
Works and Building.
It is your responsibility to inform the Post Office, the Phone Company for
Enhanced gii emergency purposes and all other interested parties of this
correction.
9 Si cer4ely.
Y"
a Nlma 'er
Permit Coordinator
City of Edmonds
I
Cc: Fire Department
Police Department
Utility Billing
Public Works
'Building Official/Street File
L\TeTM\]DST's\Master 1--ftem\Address Change
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Nov 21 Ue UI:UUP
- i i " 7 -T 7'
virarge L-06iU %,ur-V-
0
Nov 21, 2002
Fax: 425-771-0221
Attn: Lara Palmatier
M Lara,
I am requesting a change to the following addresses:
Old Address New Address
21405 73,d pl W 21505 73rd PI W
21407 73rd PI W' 21507 73"d PI W
The current addresses do not correspond with the street crossing
Best Regards,
H Abmadruia��,
206-715-0747
V E D
13UILDING DEPT.
11
RETURN ADDRESS:
City of Edmonds,- City Clerk
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
CONFORMED COPY
200108070284
08/07/2001 12:42 PM Snohomish
P.0002 RECORDED County
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Reference #: ao 0 / __ 0 5�R
Grantor(s): (1)._ Ahm" Additional on pg.
Grantee(s): .. Cily of Edmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec , n n
2L_L_Twn_A3 Rng b
_�Qtr A/ �.V
OR Lot ----Block Plat
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (I SO /3 -WQ 005 - — (2)
------Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned
WHEREAS, Z-,T-Al Iq #InA, QAJ_TA
are the owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit:
Property Addres s: , 2-0-1 Q 72, P L
Legal Description: LSI Ty?)"CA_-,_,
Fle?6?- ?-e-LoCki-A 11 OF RL�X-I,S
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # (s): 6 0 _�> _0 /-' _:? (), (-)(- ) 0 0 I-S—lel 0- 0 1�_
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
C, of Edmonds
By:_.. 447 Date
Page of
WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive
covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00-040 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code. . WITNESSETH, that f I or and in
consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to
the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit:
That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the
Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing
may be erected on subject property containing more than 12 .units.
Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and'
their heirs, successors and assigns.
DATED this day of 01
1 2
GRANTOR
GRANTOR
State of Washington
County of Ql&,) )ss
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that myt,�pgtg
signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the
inst�ument and acknowledged it as the OL Jtitle) of —
yoppezy (name of party on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be
the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentions in this
instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this ;;8 day of
6 S. Notary Pi in and for the State of Washington.
_0
�O
A
OT
f3 e
_
My commission expires
PUBLIC
�A V&
Z �- 17
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
City of
Edmonds
,,F WAS B y: ate
Page of .12—
LATEMMUILDINGWORMSMESTRICT
0 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES
I ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE APWA
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP TWO SETS OF APPROVED PLANS ON SITE AT
ALL TIMES FOR RECORDING AS -BUILT INFORMATION; ONE SET SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., AT
COMPLETION OF CONSTRACTION.
3. PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK PERTAINING TO DRAINAGE, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL CONTACT THE EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION TO SET UP
SCHEDULING.
4. GRADING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY RIGHT- OF- WAY MUST COMPLY WITH
CHAPTER 70 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE.
5. ALL PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CLASS "B"BEDDING IN ACCORDANCE
WITH APWA STANDARDS.
6. BACKFILL TRENCH OF PIPES IN LIFTS OF 6 INCHES TO 8 INCHES AND COMPACT
TO 95 PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSITY (ASTM D- 1557) UNDER ROADWAYS AND 90
PERCENT MAXIMUM DENSITY (ASTM D-1557) OFF ROADWAYS.
7. ALL BUILDING DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED
TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
8. ALL STROM PIPE AND FITTINGS DESIGNATED AS PVC SHALL BE POLYVINYL
CHLORIDE (SDR-35) WITH RUBBER GASKETS CONFORMING TO ASTM D-3034-73.
9. INSTALL TEMPORARY CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT TRAPS ON ALL EXISTION OR
NEW CATCH BASINS ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
10. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE TO TOP OF PAVEMENT
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
11. IF ANY UNKNOWN SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING
CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHALL IMMDIATELY BE BROUCHT TO THE ATTENTION
OF THE OWER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL
EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN IN USE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA
WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
13. PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT
ADJACENT PROPERTIES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, AT ALL TIMES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INPORTING AND/OR
EXPORTING ALL MATERIAL AS REQUIRED TO PROPRLY CRADE THE SITE TO
THE FINISHED ELEVTIONS SHOWN HEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND THE SOILS ENGINEER'S F'F'cF�'v5D
RECOMMENDATIONS.
MAR
c)EVELOPMEt4T SERVICES CTR-
ctTy OF EDMONDS
0 0
15. THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO
THE APPROVED PLANS, WHICH ARE ON FILE WITH EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT
SERIVERS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE
WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE APPROPRIATE DIVISION.
16. ALL "ENGINEERED FILL" SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT MAXIMUM
DENSITY (ASTM D- 1557). ALL IMPORTED FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE BANK RUN
GRAVEL, CLASS "B." THE EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
SUCCESSIVE HORIZONTAL LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 8 INCHES IN LOOSE
THICKNESS WHICH INCLUDES FILL IN CULVERT AREAS.
17. THE FACES OF CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAINTAINED
TO CONTROL AGAINST EROSION. THIS CONTROL MAY CONSIST OF EFFECTIVE
PLANTING. THE PROTECTION FOR THE SLOPES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SOON
AS PRACTICABLE. WHERE CUT SLOP ARE NOT SUBJECT TO EROSION DUE TO
THE EROSION -RESISTANT CHARACTER OF THE MATERIALS, SUCH
PROTECTION MAY BE OMITTED.
18. CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE SWALES TO DRAIN BACK, SIDES AND FRONTS OF ALL
BUILDINGS AS NECESSARY, 2.0 PERCENT MINIMUM SLOPE.
19. CONSTRUCTION OF DEWATERING (GROUNDWATER) SYSTEM SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH T14E APWA STANDARD SPECIFCATION, SECTION 61-3.02.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE THAT ALL EXISTING STROM DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES RECEIVING RUNOFF FROM T14E SITE HAVE NOT BEEN IMPACTED
BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
0 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODE
REQUIRMENTS IN PROVIDING EXTENSION TO PIPING, CONDUIT AND OTHER
UTILY ACTIVITIES.
2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR DETAILED INFORMATION AND DIMENSIONS RELATED TO
CURB RETURNS, PLANTER DIMENSIONS, SETBACKS, PAVEMENT EDGE
LOCATIONS, ETC.
3. FOR AID IN UTILITY LOCATION CALL 1-800424-5555 PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION.
4. ALL CURBING TO BE 6 INCHES HIGH EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURBING PER
DETAIL AS NOTED ON PLAN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. CONFLICTS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF BARGHAUSEN
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. AND SHALL BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION.
6. UTILITY LINES MAY NOT BE COVERD UNTIL AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN TESTED
AND APPROVED. UPON COMPLETION OF THE BACDFILL OPERATIONS, THE
UTILITY LINES SHALL BE RETESTED.
7. ALL UTILITY LINE EXCAVATION BEDDING AND BACKFILL MATERIALS AND
COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS
ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE GOVERNING AGENCY
REQUIREMENTS.UTILITY LINES SHALL INCLUDE STORM DRAIN, WATER,
SEWER, ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, AND LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION LINES.
8. ALL SANITARY SEWER LINE SHALL BE PVC SDR 35 SEWER PIPE CONFORMING
TO ASTM D-303A-73. CALL THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT 425-771-0220, EXT
1326 FOR INSPECTION.
9. ALL WATER SERVICE SHALL BE COPPER TYPE K OR POLYETHYLENE PIPE.
POLYETHYLENE PIPE SIZE SHALL BE IRON PIPE SIZE ASTM-D2239-SIDR#7-
PE3406, AND SHALL BE MARKED AT INTERVALS NO GREATER THAN 5' WITH
T14E MANUFACTURERS NAME, SIZE AND MINIMUM PSI RATING OF 160PSI. 12
GAUGE VINYL COATED WIRE SHALL BE CONTINUOUS, WRAPPED AROUND THE
METER AND AT THE HOUSE AND SHALL BE TAPED TO THE WATER PIPE EVERY
10'. CALL THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AT 425-771-0220, EXT 1326 FOR
INSPECTION.
10. A TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL CONCRETE EDGES TO WHICH
ASPHALT IS TO BE PLACED.
11. SOIL STERILIZATION (WEED KILLER) SHALL BE APPLIED IN AREAS TO BE
PAVED. KEEP 2 FEET (MIN) CLEAR OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
AREAS.APPLY AT MANUFCTURER'S RECOMMENDED RATE TO ASSURE PROPER
PENETRATION.
12. SURFACE SMOOTHNESS OF ASPHALT SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE IF
EXCEEDING 1/4 INCH USING A I 0-FOOT STRAIGHT EDGE. PONDING OR
0
0
"BIRDBATHS" EXCEEDING 1/4 INCH IN DEPTH SHALL LNOT BE ACCEPTABLE
AND SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
13. ALL EXISTING UTILIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM A
FIELD SURVEY AND FROM AVAILABLE PUBLIC RECORDS. CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, WHICH MAY
CONFLICT WITH CONSTRUCTION WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, OR NOT.
ENGINEER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT ALL UTILITIES HAVE BEEN SHOWN.
14. IT S14ALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S REPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE TELEPHONE
COMPANY, THE GAS COMPANY,THE POWER COMPANY, AND THE CABLE TV
COMPANY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SO THAT THESE OTHER UTILITIES CAN
PREPARE THE NECESSARY PLANS FOR THE EXTENTION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO
COORDINATE THESE ACTIVITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
15. FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND
DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND TO PROVIDE FINAL CLEANUP ACTIVITIES AS
DIRECTED BY EITHER THE CITY OF EDMONDS OR T14E OWNER'S ENGINEER.
CITY OF EDMONDS
EROSION / SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL PLAN NOTES
ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENTATION/ EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES� MUST BE
CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE
THAT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURALd DRAINAGE
SYSTEM. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT
CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND POTENTIAL FOR ON -
SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. THE IMPLEMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL
BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE.
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON THESE
PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO MEET
ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UN
EXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, FACILITIES WILL BE
NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SILATION CONTROL IN T14E PROPOSED
SITE. DURING THE COURES OF CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE T14E OBLIGATION
AND RESPONSIBILTY OF THE PERMITTEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS
THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
FACILITIES, OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENMTS, AS MAY BE
NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER QUALITY OF THE
RECEIVING DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
3. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ONLY.
IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, SIZE,
NOR LOCATION OF PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS OR RETENTION
FACILITIES.
4. ANY DISTURBED AREA WHICH BEEN STRIPPED OF VECETATION AND WHERE
NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR MORE
MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH MULCHING, GRASS PLANTING, OR
OTHER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL TREATMENT APPLICABLE TO THE TIME
OF YEAR IN QUESTIONS. GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY
DURING THE MONTHS OF APRIL THROUGH SEPTEMBER, INCLUSIVE. SEEDING
MAY PROCEED OUTSIDE THE SPCIFIED TIME PERIOD WHENEVER IT IS IN THE
INTEREST OF THE PERMITTEE, BUT MUST BE AUGMENTED WITH MULCHING,
NETTING, OR OTHER TREATMENT APPROVED BY SNOHOMISH COUNTY.
ru
30, Af.4 - 'A t �
CA
NOTE:
A- IF DRIVEWAY WIDTH EXCEEDS
15', INSTALL A FULL DEPTH EXPANSION
JOINT.
OR
16' VERTICAL CURB
DRIVEWAY APRON SHALL BE A MINIMUM EXPANSION JOINT
OF 6- THICK AND SHALL BE PLACED ON 51
2' OF 5/8' CSTC AND COMPACTED GRADE.
1/2' LIP
-10 S�I-lllpt 6' CURB
CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 300OPSI
CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE PDURED-
SEPARATELY FROM THE SIDEWALK.
FORM INSPECTION REQUIRED PRIOR TO POUR.
Est. 189U
REVISIONS I
DATE
DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITIONAL DETAIL FOR
CURB AND GUTTER OR VERTICAL CURBS
STANDARD DETAIL
STANDARD DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE
5/14/98 1 SCALE NTS IDWG NO. E2.26
There were several issues with this permit during the review of the drawings. The biggest was
access width on the south side of the project. Originally the architect indicated two way traffic and
this would have required a 16' driveable access. In order to meet that requirement the architect was
told he first floor of the existing house to be cut back in order to get the required 16' and initially, that
was shown on the drawings. Our policy, although unwritten but used for years, required a two foot
shy distance from structures which the ECDC defined fences and of course buildings as structures.
This issue was expressed to the architect and when Gordy did the initial review and I carried if forth
when I took over. I sent Nasser excerpts from the code that defined structures and tried numerous
times to -explain why it was required. We went around and around on this and he procrastinated in
responding to our requirements. Finally he decided to make the access on the south side one-way
and we identified the access width as a minimum of 12'. With the first floor cut back and the access
one-way, the required distances could have been met. As it turned out, the architect's drawings did
not accurately depict the width between the existing fence and building. The shy distance was still
required from the fence but allowed him to place a curb along the side of the house, which was to
have landscaping behind it to provide some protection to the house. When inspected the minimum
width, shy distance, curbing and landscaping was not met nor could it be.
August 13, 1980
MEMO TO: Planning Department
FROM: Engineering Division
SUBJECT: AUGUST 20, 1980 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING
CONTINUED AGENDA
1. V-21-80 HAROLD WICKSTROM - Variance from required underground
requirement of Chapter 6.30.060 for property located
at 20331 83rd Avenue West. (RS-8)
No comment other than to note that the requirement was
made for undergrounding at the time of subdivision and
again at the time of building permit application. All
other newer homes in the area have underground electric
service.
2. V-22-80 NEAL & KAY JOHNSTON - Variance from required rear yard
setback, access width, and reduction of square footage
requirement at 21405 73rd Place West. (RML)
I
Engineering Division does not object to this variance.
The existing 23 feet should be adequate for an access
road plus utility installation. At time of A.D.B. app-
lication the site plan shall be reviewed for code confor-
mance of said road plus parking layout and other site
improvements. We have no comment on the other two aspects
of this application.
AGENDA
FA
3. V-24-80 DAVE HERMANS - Variance to Waive minimum lot width to
length requirement and to allow fireplaces to inavade
setbacks approximately two feet at 221 3rd Ave. S. (RMFI)
Neither of these variances shall adversley effect the
previously approved parking lot/site plans. Engineering
does not object to these variances. (See'ADB-114-78)
DAN SMITH DIV
0
0
4.19.60
C&0�!S%JNVEX AND Ri�VIEW ASSI-aNMF--NT-S--
:,I I ffiN4 ACTIO V-22-96DATE 6-Z3-AdpA4E
WNER'NAME,*.- A/fig/ XQY 740klyst-061
ADD RE 33'-, Z /.?Z— jilMet AVE-wo
APPLICANT NAME' Q on-e
ADDRESS:
SITE LOCATION OR ADDRESS*. 0 5-- 7.? W,,
A 0 N Ell R
L E Ca A L 0 E"S C R IFTI 0-14%. S-4 1-(4Se-4eV§, 7-rqcrs PIV,No,3
ATTACHED'
-F I L E Jvd,
OR
TYPE OF
ACTION
-:E R6,11,J
D I V.,
RE C'D.
DATE
lu
a
pe,
z
ul
51-
z
ci
z
MEETIJVG
Rp-suLrs
Lr
Of g
Q6
;2 al
cm,
t
a
ac
j
� - .
a , NtXT.''
UZI MliETING
-,,I PATE
f.-�
SET
v
FILE01
IW�.
z
;
z
u
oca
6
Li
o"J'A
A
4%
L
ul
Z
X
x
X1,
-
n
RE
PATE TO
NOT S�
DATi BY
-A
ATE TO
-ENGINEERING-
REVIEWS
g.1 a
DATE
S
BY
PREVIOUS 141STORY
S17-E REVIEW V(51T
UTILI-TIES
PRAlNA4F-/r*Fd6AAPJ4Y
srREErs ISIDEWALKS
TRAFFIC/PARKIN6
'rFIRE
MAASHAL,
F&C
MEMO TO PLANNING
July 9, 1980
Page 3 7,,,E.ET nLE
S Ti A
7. V-22-80 NEAL & KAY JOHNSTON - Variance from required rear yard
setback, access-width,--and.-reductionlof square footage
requirement ! (RML)
,,1_,3r&_.Place West
Engineering Divis ion does not object to this variance.
The existing 23 feet should be adequate for an access
road plus utility installation. At time of A.D.B.
application the site plan shall be reviewed for code
conformance of said road plus parking layout and other
site improvements. We have no comment on the other two
aspects of this application.
8. V-23-80 J-.-�DIRK-LO[IMAN---Vari-6rft#---froiii required rear yard setback
alt, -1 88l7.5o_und._Vi6w -Place. ?RS-12)
No comment.
OAN SMITH DT.
/6
JIM ADAMS DT.
V-22-80 NEAL and KAY JOHNSTON-- - Variance from required rear yard setba ck, access
wid and square footage requirement at 05 73rd Pl-. W,.,, (RML)
r1arkes requested were to Pard setback from 20' to
I A reduce thOle
18' and to allow 5 units when the area would support only 4.7 units. It
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FAS E-1
b Page 4 - July 16, 1980
4441V.4 &f-
Aye Ze fteAu
% ded for the access width. Mr.
was determined that a variance was not nee
Bowman reviewed the variance criteria. This would not amount to a rezone
nditions involved. Adjacent properties had
and there were no special co
been developed to the north and west with multi -family and with single
family farther to the west. Strict enforcement of the zoning -code would
deprive the property owner of rights enjoyed by other Properties in the
same district because adjacent properties had been developed to a higher
density. There were no unnecessary hardships in carrying out the provisions
of the zoning code, however. Granting of the variances would not be detri-
mental to the health, safety, or welfare of other property owners in the
vicinity because of the higher density developed in adjacent areas. Mr.
Bowman felt both were minimum variances and that they would be compatible
with the zoning code as the property generally would be developed in
accordance with RML requirements. He recommended approval The public
portion of the hearing was opened.
The applicant had nothing to add, and no one else wished to speak. The
public portion of the hearing was closed.
Mrs. Medina noted that they were 640 sq. ft. below the required area for
five units. She was told the intent was to build a fourplex behind the
existing house. Mrs. Medina observed that the zoning had been changed in
order to reduce the number of units on these lots so she did not believe
that 640 sq. ft. was a minimum variance. Mr. Hatzenbuhler noted that it is
easier to build a fourplex than a triplex. MR. HATZENBUHLER MOVED TO
APPROVE V-22-80 BECAUSE HE DID NOT FEEL IT WOULD ENDANGER THE PUBLIC HEALTH
AND MORALS AND HE FELT IT WOULD BE IN HARMONY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND
WOULD MAKE REASONABLE USE OF THE LAND. VICE CHAIRMAN BYRD SECONDED THE
MOTION, FEELING IT WAS A MINIMUM VARIANCE WHEN CONSIDERING THE SURROUNDING
DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY. Mrs. Medina said the area around this site is
overdeveloped and the zoning was changed to alleviate some -of that. She
felt there was a valid reason to rezone that area and said added units
would create additional traffic. Mr. Hatzenbuhler argued that.property is
becoming a premium and it is not possible to spread out more so the only
choice Is to be more dense on the ground. Mr. Bowman noted that the single
family development is farther to the west and that the apartAent develop-
ment is all just to the north of this site and farther to the I south. ' He
said this is one of -the last pieces of property there that can be developed
into apartments, that it is a single family house existing in a multi-
family zone. Mrs. Medina said there are children all over the place, and
the question was whether this was a minimum variance, and she thought it
was not. THE VOTE WAS TAKEN, WITH MR. HATZENBUHLER AND VICE CHAIRMAN BYRD
VOTING YES, AND WITH MRS. MEDINA AND MRS. McGEE VOTING NO, RESULTING IN A
TIE VOTE. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A MAJORITY.
At the request of a person in the audience, MRS. MEDINA MOVED, SECONDED BY
MRS. McGEE, TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING. 140TION CARRIED.
The public portion of the hearing was reopened.
Don VanDriel, 1233 Olympic View Dr., said he had been involved in selling.
this property originally. He said the home is on the street and there is a
23' access alongside the home which is adequate for access to the rear.
The back portion of the property has large apartments on one side and a
nursing home at the back of it, and it becomes a large piece of property
which is zoned for multi -family dwellings. He felt the highest and best
usage in that area could best be served by allowing this variance. He said
it wou-ld not cause any problems because the other development is quite a
distance from the property line. Further, he noted that the change was
from a 3-unit to a 4-unit building, a matter of one additional unitg and
the design of a building normally is not that different, and for appearance's
sake it normally would not look that different. He also noted that the
buildings would not even be seen from the street. He felt that by limiting
it to three units that would be cutting down a large portion of the allowable
space and in the costs of construction and of land that would adversely
affect the owner. He said these fourplex units have become very acceptable
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 5 - July 16. 1980
and are comfortable units, and the traffic conditions made by one unit
would not be adverse when you consider that the adjoining apartme ' nt building
is 34 or 35 units. He requested that the variance be approved.
There were no changes indicated in any of the votes. MRS. MEDINA MOVED,
SECONDED BY MRS. McGEE, TO CONTINUE V-22-80 TO AUGUST 20, 1980 TO ALLOW
MORE BOARD MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE. THE MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney
,Wayne Tanaka advised the Board members that they should not engage in any
contact with any of the parties and they should not discuss this matter
,,among themselves.
CITY OF EDMONDS FILE # --U'
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE &h�-*o
F E E
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
REC-T #
HEARING DATE:
APPLICANT Neal & Kay JohnstorADDRESS 2132 93rd Ave. W 'CITY & ZIP Edmonds, 98020
PHONE 774 6198 _Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: Owner
OWNER: —Same ADDRESS,CITY & ZIP Same as Above PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS) 21405 73rd Place W. Edmonds, WA 98020
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERY: Lot #5, Luschen's Tracts Division No.3, as per plat
recorded in Volume 17 of plats -on p . age 87 records of Snohomish County; Situate
in the county of Snohomish, State of Washington
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED & APPROVE[
USE ZONE RML BY PLANNING DIVISION
I
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: 1.) Rear yard set back (20')
Vkrj,� req()JV'e�
2.) A 66e-s-s-wi d th -42-4�
M V- L %4 %A L �-LIIUII 0
� 77f ��
VARIANCE REQUESTED: 1.) Reduction of rear vai
I
wi,dath
-2-&—w-i-de--a-t-bq-c-k
3.) Allow a reduction of s
W
footage
requirement of 5.6
percent or 686sq.ft.
STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
ATTACHED: See Attached
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
Ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
her or Representative
Si'gnatuKe of Applicant,
On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
who, bein(
duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (s)he has prepared"and read the-fc-regoing
statementsand hasacknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are Lru,,4, and- has
signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes ther6in
mentioned.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this.!��,'�-day of 19
resi�ing at,,',.,*
Notary Public in and for,,,the State of WdRf4i54tbK-
JUL 8 1�,O
Dir u.
*-*ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT
POINT 1. The 'following are the special circumstances whic I h apply to my property
which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity under the identical zone classification.
See Attached
POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the properties or improvements.in the vicinity of a zone in
which my property is located becausei
See Attached
POINT 3. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will continue
to the owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond his control because:
See Attached
POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this
variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause in-
consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone
in which I am located.
Variance I and II: None
Variance III: It would seem appropiate if the applicant were
reguired to install a 5' solid cedar fence along
0 the rear property line. .. REG WED.
JYL 8 1980
r,
CHI'. Of Prblic
OR
I'-
L-A
0
VV.W 1/229-*_ 4 EDMONDS- LYP# OOD- MOUNTLA%
5 �i E . . . . . . . . . ....... ......
loo
343-.8
343.08
;713-07 60
2
4
'ARSHEr's
cc
Y(BLAND6 plj�opoS El D
Z1317 VA�MNGE
h 7
T AqTS 2
IT4
2
5
9:
1
LU
6
0 84.4
80
2
4
8TH
ST.
S-E
80
30
8 10
62.778. .
16
V.
N
2
&LI S
H
is
12
10
1 rb 15 Z�
6
-7-521,
S's
14
140
140 13'
W,
SOLNERS
10 14
CTsL_
140.84
>
.1
_q
n I V
D I V
.0.-3
6
\2 5
140.70
12
__jjL5.t__
l4o
C\j
60
CO 10
IL
IOTH
217
0
28
11 71A
TIC
'IC
Cl
CE"
0 1 ITH ST. --------
S. E.
f i ih r 4-h
29
�E
41
W
>
23
2
F I VE 0
0
—.01 1 60 L
ST. S. E.
I A�
I Nt
REC
."J U L 8
Dir. Of
c
&
D
ov
�4- f,
2
It,
s
vc
6'
2 8'
)<
T Fo I
ON /0
2-5 '_,?o-IRECEIVC7,
JUL 8 1980
6, 's 7 Jb-, x 5 6,
�5 CAL F / ". - �'? 0' Dir. Of Pl,;;... - -
IS'
ai 9 9 o
Vt
C4
45
.14
+
47
C)
co
-P
PF:1CM1 No00//$77--.,,
OWNER. ..... . ...... ..........
..... ...... .. .......... . .....
.....
ul
I 10 U.�� Fl. No.
LOT No . .... . . .. . ........ ..... .... .
1-1,LOCK No.
.... .... ....... OX
cc Z.
NAME MM-). . ................. . ... ...... .. .......
... .......... . ... ............ ......... ...
w) -
L
Date
............................. DEPOSIT, $ ................... .................. ......
BACKFILL WORK Uml,--. ..............
.1
,�,8EWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ............ -
Approved:
APPROVED
UG 4 1964
.....................
0
POINT 1':,
Variance I
The existing house vyas constructed too close to
the property line to allow required access. At
present the applicant is deprived of the right to
construct four units on his property because of
this circumstance.
Variance II:
The applicant had obta'iried an agreement to be
granted some additional land from the adjoining
property to the north. This additional land
would have satisfied the zohing requirements.
The property to the north is presently a legal
non conforming building. By ordinance, this :.
precludes the granting of a lot line adj'ystment,
thus making the granting of said land impossible.
Variance III:
The required set back between the existing house
and the proposed new building causes the new building
to extend towards the rear of the yard farther than
would normally be required.
POINT 2 s,
Variance It
The proposed drive
abutting drive of
will be consistent
vicinity.
Variance II:
way will run parallel with an
a multi -unit building. The drive
with existing drives in the
The granting of this variance will not adversley
effect or be injurious to any of the properties
in the vicinity. A majority of the surrounding
construction is at a higher density then this
variance would allow.
Variance III:
The building that is on the property abuttl'!,&Cr-_�iVE..'�
the rear of applicants property is at a lower
elevation that causes most of the proposed.. JUL 8 1980
building site to be hidden from its view:
Taking this into consideration the granting
of a 2' variance would not adversley dffectDir.01PI'�','
that property. There would be no impact on any
other properties.
POINT 3t,-.
Variance It
If this variance is n" '.granted the owner
will be unable tocons'truct,.a multi -family
building which his..'property is zonned for.
Variance II:
The applicant feels that the intent of the
RML Zoning is to limit density to an accept-
able level. The addition of three tenths
of a unit seems to fall into this level of
acceptance. It would be an unnecessary
hardship to not be allowed to build within
the intent of the zoning laws.
Variance III:
There would be no hardship imposed directly
upon the owner of this property. The hard-
ship would be imposed upon the general public.
The applicant feels an obligation to provide
the most liveable rental unit he can. By not
granting this variance it would make it
unnecessarily,difficult to build a enjoyable
living unit for a family.
RECEha
JUL 8 1980
Dir. Of
. Oft
RD
49,44-
W1,64MACeAlf
2
tk
Na
16'
s4e f—,\ ukz-
Got
L4
c
Avc I �V F CJ� -4
of
4L
MIN
'k
10
I
ien re-
N 0 0 2!� '-fo" tr
0
I
0
RECENCE-")
JUL 8 1980
Dir. Of Publir,
00
STREET
FILE
C 'I'
Y 0 F -E D M 0 N
S
D
SEWER DEPARTMENT
STOPPAGE
OF SANITARY SEWER MAIN
REPORT
DATE: 8
ZS7 7 2,
TIME CALL
RECEIVED: 0
LOCATION OF STOPPAGE:
-27
.TIME OF ARRIVAL ON THE JOB SITE:
TIME NORMAL -FLOW OF SANITARY ZEWER REESTABLISHED: 9'-7 -0
CAUSE OF STOPPAGE: -?:2& C:7
jw C) c' e-4 co AA�) L4 '0"'4"A-j 7-0 /-/11 L-��
ACTION REQUIRED TO CLEAR,MAIN AND/OR LATERAL: T?
C/ I
/7— c--.� A r /? U�-lv /-j C, r7-,A:::7 12 -e7K:�-)
CITY CREW ON STOPPAGE CALL OUT (Personnel Involved):
z 41zc'd ((Z 17�-ii IiE '�q L
0 li c' X/
LOCATION OF RESIDENCE AFFECTED:
NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER: r- Lj C, L-�
�21 '-Io,�— rc- c—J :2 4— S
DESCRIBE..DAMAGE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY: 0 jc_ P/ C, 7-7 )43L -F- r-
REMARKS:
On
Aj 77)q;e 4L L/ T 'I L/�� 7
L/
ATE RECEIVED —1
�
A F
?—/3--CO
.0
P ERMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE PERMIT
ZONE
41101
NUMBER - t�7
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS 731,
Cy Wes 7—
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER �AME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
LID FEE $
W
W
10
MAILING ADDRESS
1630LI
PUBLIC RIGHT 'OF YVAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Approved
RW Permit Required
EXISTING (!'-'p PROPOSED f
Street Use PermitReq'd
Inspection Required
Sidewalk Required
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
z
REQUIRED DEDICATION_ FT
Underground
Wiring required
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
v;
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
0 0
9
0
tvt
.. .1
YES NO
cc
W
L)
ADDR SS
23
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
z
z
a
z
LU
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
NAME
ENGINEERING R"EVIEWEDgATE
ADDRESS
c:
0
0
<
FIREIIAEVIEWED BY DATE
W
l'-
z
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
M
LL
0
0
VARIANCE On CU
SHORELINE OR(�?W
'Poo
INSPECTION
EO'D
BOND
POSTED
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DAT E
f
CHECKED BY
8<� (3 NO
SEPA REVIEW
COMPLETE EXE�PT
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PROPOSED
HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
003
I
,
LLJ
EXP
Ej�vEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH
X
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOSED
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT SIDE REAR
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT UR SIDE REAR
ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
Z
z
z
PARKING
REO' D PROVIDED __
LOT ARiEA
PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
I
16 Lo I
4K'l
REMODEL 'hPARTMENT 0 SIGN
REPAIR C] GRADI C] FENCE X
J%b YDS FT)
P, C
REMARKS
DEMOLISH TANK OTHER
t
z
Ei GARAGE RETA NING WALL RENEWAL
CA OC ' Y
RPORT R ER
1SF11r_ _t5 7�,
(TYPE OF USE BUSINES5 OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
P:
a.
CHECKEDBY
TYPE OF CON STRUCJION
CqQq7
OCCUPANT
EC
Q
V_/V
GROUP
NUMBER
NUMBER OF
CRITICAL
/
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
OCCUPANT
OF
DWELLIN13
AREAS
0
STORIES
UNIT
NUMBER
JAREA
REQUIRED
LOAD
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION RECI'D
a
VALUATION
FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
HEAT SOURC7 --- GLAZING% LOT SLOPE % BUILDING
PLAN CHECK NO'. VESTED DATE PLUMBING
00-3,
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
GRADING/FILL
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
STATE SURCHARGE
Ir
LU PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
"APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Uj IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
LANDSCAPING
_j
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE
ir
< ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
RECEIPT
x FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
a
i DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RECEIP
=1 T!�7
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLIC�ATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT., AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE)IVORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF THE'LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S COM�*�Z4101N 1,NSURAN( W 18.27.
�E AN[D FIC
OFFICI#tS SIGNA;PaE DATE
�q �-A' IN DATE SIGNED
SIGNATUF (425) /Z
�7
rz ;711,il /o/
771-0220
RELEASeD BY DATE
AT2(ENTIOW EXT/333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR S TRUCTURE UNTIL 2
771 -Or_r_ I
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI_ ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPEC OR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK -OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
-DATE RECEIVED I
PERMIT EXPIRES
F
USE
PERMIT
E.
CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER
JOB T#
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION ADDRE
ss 7
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. OT NO. LID NO.
MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE $
W TESCP Approved
z
0
PUBLIC RIGHT OF, WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Permit Required
0 Street Use Permit Req'd 0�
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required
Sidewalk Required
x REQUIRED DEDICATION "�Z FT Urtda,ground
"4 ne, - I Wiring required 0
NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE J_N�0�9,17,'FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED
10 0 L
ley YES NO 0 z
r ac
zi C.
ADDRESS REMARKS z
z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
z
cc w
4 1
e"
ZIP TELEPHONE
7TY
:A
NAME
v,
f 1.1 ENGINE�RING�, x Y
cc ADDRESS
U
4 FIRK' EVIEYVED'19Y �s DATE Lu
cc 'i!` �' I
CITY ZIP NE M
z
0
Q
7 — 1ARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE 6P INSPECTION BOND
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY REO'D POSTED
E],YES 0 NO
I R-EVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED
- — — 'A 11
0
w I
_j EXP
NEW RESIDENTIAL LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
"20 PLUMBING MECH ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR
z
Ei COMPLIANCE OR
ADDITION E] COMMERCIAL 'j . , j
CHANGE OF USE z
PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REMODEL 1�0.,','APARTMENT SIGN R7�D I PR�r�V,I,DED
0
GRAJ�0', FENCE TL
REPAIR CYDS ( X FT) REMARKS
OTHER
DEMOLISH TANK
I Kir /,!I I,
GARAGE
z Oil CARPORT RIEOTAINING WALL RENEWAL
CKERY
0 ('C
P: (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
0. CHECKEDBY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE C
OCOUPANT "t,
OR UP
ilk
W NUMBER �NUMBE,R OF CRITICAL
NG AREAS �j
DWELL 2 4W' SPECIAL INSPECTOR OCCUPANT
M OF P
REQUIRED LOAD
'74li, UNITS NUMBER YES
0 STORIES 4�' - I % )
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS
z
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION RECI'D 8
n
ry'l i
7
Art
4-Ir Pt)l4f A rkl)h f"', Y'.xv Airs,
VALUATION FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE %
BUILDING
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING
MECHANICAL Q
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
2 STATE SURCHARGE
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
E NAI� P
(n APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS FEE
W ;N INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE Cj I y OF
j LANDSCAPING
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY —
RECEIPT 7
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
_j DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
x RECEIPT,
1 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK -AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NOTPERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOA CODE OF THE STATE,OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S C?pP
�SATIbN INSURANCE AND .' RC%�,-18.27. OFFICIALS SIGNATU14'E' 0
.11 DATE
SIGNATUREie (425)
6*NER,%R AGEN DATE.,�IGNED
771-0220
ELEASED BY DATE
AT,TENTION' EXT1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPE'CTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
FAX
5/98
77-7
City of Edmonds Permit No:
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT issue Date: 4P12-9-1,0 Z_
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: ;Y
B. Type of Work (be specific):'UTIL4 Tf, PtW I k)(1 Ity- 4-YM(5P ?L,&)-S
dAu, For.?-
C. Cbntracto-i H15 F%
11L "f4
Mailing Address::)0%.1 I L,_r4vD C/
Stat . e License #:J HSE K "(6 2 4 �2 0
D. Building Permit # (if applicable):
Contact: ok .01
Phone:'70 C. .3!5� 6, 1
Lia bility Insurance: Bond:
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. R Commercial F1 Subdivision F] City Project F] EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD)
CR Multi -Family Single Family R Other
INSPECTOR:
F. PAVEMENT CUT: [__1 YES El NO G. SIZE OF CUT x
CONCRETE CUT: El YES El NO
Al'I'LICANTTO M,Al) ANI) SIGN
INDEMNITY.- Applicant understands by hislher - signature to this application helshe holds. the City of Edmonds harmless ftom
injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of
Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense
costs and attorneyfeeshy reason ofgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES W!LL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS
COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT W?LL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THEAPPLICANT.
* Traffic, control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every
'flagger' must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the
required training in their possession.
* Restoration is to:be in accordance with City codes. All street-c.ut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City -
approved material prior to the end of the workday 7- NO EXCEPTIONS.
* Three sets of construction drawings of proposedwork are required with the permit application.
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
I HA VE READ THE ABOVE STA TEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND A CKNO WLEDGE
THA TI.MUSTMAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMITA VAILABLE ONSITE A TALL.TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS
A
Sigi7ature:
or Agent)
Date:
FOR CITY USE ONLY,
A Qyled by:.,A�6 Ri ght-of-W
ppr ay F1770 4 5
Time -Authorized:. Void After, Wgrfi, lnmrl Disruption Fee/Fund 111: -
Special Conditions: 6AW F04 IkkW-Mht NO" N�OkklRestoration Fee:
A4, 4 'e'/ , 4.,o,
uq&l 50%) VU" to-cKmOtAs tc_00 f5e�w P"14&4- Total Fee:.' 1 S
1A U ST ftAv F, A U %,'AWM-*99 —t M6'� e*004 K4W' R- eceipt No:
to Ift Issued
01wit 00
UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 42,5-771-0220, Ext. 13, 6)
FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. DATE:
Inspector's Signature
For inSDection reauirements see En2ineerin2 InSDection Information handout.
NO WOIZK SHAIA, lll,(,IN I'MOIZ TO I'EIZMI'F ISSLJANCE
DAMy Documents\Forms\Engnmg\ROWpermit—.doc
W 001 on 1: 1 :4 - 010- WN ? F: Us:
SAM CHEN
15421 56th A\/f=NUE 5E
BOTHELL, INA5111N&TON claOI2
(20(b) -711-1515
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
5ECTION 2f-i TOM5HIF 2-T RAN&E 04 OUARTER NI/4 LU5CHEN5
TRACT5 Dl\/ 5 BLK 000 D-Ol TH FTN LOT 5 5D FLAT
BEIN& MORE PARTICULARLY DAF BE& 5Vq COR 5D LOT 5
TH NOO*51 05Yi ALC7 Yq LN 5D LOT P15T 4a.45FT TAFCR\/
TH NELY AL6 OR\/ To L HA\/6 RAD BEAR N4cl*06101N
O/A 45*25'42" RAD 40.00FT DIST 51.71FT TH Na5*25
Oe)E 64.8-IFT THSOO*25 54E 65.8-IFT TH Ne?1*15 45Y4
'14.45FT TO FOB AKA UNIT LOT A CITY OF r=r?M 55D No.
5- 05-55 REC AFN 20050'7015005
SITE ADDRESS
2150-1 '75rd PLACE NE5T
ZONING
RM-2.4
TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER
00501500000501
LOT AREA
5662 50UARE FEET
LOT COVERAGE
CALCULATION
NO CHAN65E
I f1j, a-3 11:01=111
LIVIN6 AREA
1240
SQUARE FEET MAIN LEVEL
LIVIN(5 AREA
c`125
SQUARE FEET LONER LEVEL
LIVIN6 AREA
4125
SQUARE FEET TOTAL
GARA&E
252
SQUARE FEET
DECK
1012
SQUARE FEET
� I 0L "D x0el m 01
A-1 51TE PLAN, FROJECT DATA AND INDEX OF DRANIN65
A-1.1 EXTERIOR EI_F_V`ATION5
A-2 UPPER LE\/EL FLOOR PLAN
A-5 LONER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
A-4 DETAIL5
(IS
10'7
9
1011
1
W
1
21�071
VO I I I
ILL11
Im
0
106
SITE P"LAN
SCALE. I" = 10'-0"
NORTH
M**
.55o2a,5,yj 151.641
5 R
tn
cl
Comer Flaa
�_C.tbacks_
—Asl L La I
Front
Sides
J%cr
Rear
Other
1- Lciqj'�_t
RANDALL J. MUNSON
BUILDING DESIGNER
17713
15TH AVENUE NORTHEAST
SUITE 102
SHORELINE
WASHINGTON
98155
(206) 349-4551
randy.munson@comcast.net
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
THIS PLAN IS ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES BY THE
CLIENT INDICATED.
REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS
DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
WRITTEN CONSENT OF DESIGNER,
RANDALL J. MUNSON, IS PROHIBITED.
DESIGNER MAINTAINS ALL RIGHTS
UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW,
INCLUDING COPYRIGHT.
CONTRACTOR NOTICE
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL
CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS
AT THE JOB SITE AND NOTIFY
THE DESIGNER OF ANY DIMEN-
SIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR
DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGIN-
NING OR FABRICATING ANY WORK.
DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
REVISIONS
No. Date Item
CITY OF EDMONDS
2L 10.13.14 CORRECTIONS #1
CITY OF EDMONDS
A2 07.17.15 CORRECTIONS #1
z
0
F_
0
z
_r
U)
z
0
LL
0
2
c\I
T_
0
00
0)
z
U)
LLJ
:D Z
z _r
z LLJ U) 00
Lu < ,
0c)
cz), 0')
C0 ED
T_
c\l
U 00 00
) , co 'c\'j
ITE PLAN, GENERAL
NOTES, PROJECT
DATA and INDEX OF
DRAWINGS
PROJECT NO.
:14.116
DESIGN
RJIVI
DRAWN
RJIVI
ISSUE DATE
:07.31.14
J
F
.. . . .... ..
11%
NW
1/4) NW 1/4, SECTION
2, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.
EX DRIVE EX POWER POLE
OHP-
- — — — — — — — — — — — — \\'� --------------------
EV ACOUAI T VW'C'
BENCHMARK
CB
TOP MONUMENT
EL=100
S89' 1 5'30"E (ASSUMED)
0
215TH ST SW I
Ln 0
El SSMH� 0
18.30.050 Development approval standards for erosion and sedimentation 0 C
control (ESQ plan.
A. ESC Minimurn Requirements. All activities necessitating a clearing or grading permit and all utility
nroiects consistina of more than 500 lineal feet of trench excavation shall be required to control erosion
and sediment during construction and to permanently stabilize exposed soil resulting from construction.
Projects involving a critical area may also be required to comply with any combination of the ESC
minimum requirements. Compliance will be demonstrated through the implementation of an approved ESC - W — — L
plan. Guidelines for preparing ESC plans are provided in the manual. The plan must address the following
i�quirements: EX CB EX CB
EX WATER VALVE
1. ESC Minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be,
whenever practical, limited to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or crushed— — — SD
rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface,
the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by
shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours. Street
washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner.
in
2. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land disturb g
activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BWs, including, but not limited to, sod,
hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected, designed, and (n
maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved
timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two days from October I through April PROVIDE TEMP CH
30 and no more than seven days from May I through September 30). BASIN PROTECTION 0
DURING CONSTRUCTION
3. ESC Minimum Requirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected
from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment bwTiers or filters, dikes
or mulching, or by a combination of these measures and other appropriate BMPS.
4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosio n and sediment control BMPs shall be regularly I
inspected and maintained by the owner to ensure continued performance of their intended flinction. All
maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual.
5. ESC Minimum Requirement - Other BMPs. As required by the city, other appropriate BMPs to mitigate
the effects of increased runoff shall be applied.
C9
6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement 6 Underground Utility Construction. The construction of
underground utility lines shall specifically address the following:
a. Erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; EX CB
b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be
placed on the uphill side of trenches;
c. Trench dewatering systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable
means); ry FDGP
d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; I ASPHALT
U)
e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance. V)
7. Additional ESC Minimum Requirements for Larger Developments. All new development and
redevelopment that includes land disturbing activities of greater than, or equal to, one acre in addition to EX 8" WATER —
meeting the minimum requirements set forth above shall comply with ESC requirements listed below.
8. ESC Minimum Requirement - Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits. In the field, mark clearing limits
and/or any easements, setbacks, sensitive/critical areas and the buffers, trees and drainage courses.
9. ESC Minimum Requirement - Sediment Trapping. Prior to leaving the site, storm water runoff shall pass
through a sediment pond or sediment trap, or other appropriate BMPs. Sediment ponds and traps, perimeter
dikes, sediment barriers, and other BMI?s intended to trap sediment on -site shall be constructed as a first
step in grading. These BMPs shall be functional before land disturbing activities take place. Earthen
30' R/W-
structures, such as dams, dikes, and diversions shall be seeded and mulched according to an approved 30' R/W
timetable.
V)
10. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and Fill Slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed
in a manner that will minimize erosion. In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC
Requirement No. 2.
11. ESC Minimum Requirement - Controlling Off -Site Erosion. Properties and water ways downstream
from development sites shall be protected from erosion due to increases in the volume, velocity, and peak
flow rate of stonn water runoff from the project site.
12. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Temporary Conveyance Channels and Outlets. All
temporary on -site conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed and stabilized to prevent erosion
from the expected velocity of flow from a two-year, 24-hour frequency storm for the developed condition.
Stabilization adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes and downstream reaches
shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems.
13. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storni Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable EX ASPHALT EDGE
during construction shall be protected so that storm water rursoff shall not enter the conveyance system
V.- I- I— �r_14 A + A +_ I,— +
without st e g OL V V1 W aW ta Va V, A VILLAUV %I OV VA. . I 1 1
14. ESC Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs I
shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are I
no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting 3:
from removal shall be permanently stabilized.
15. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Dewatering Construction Sites. Dewatering systems shall
discharge into a sediment trap or sediment pond.
16. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Control of Pollutants other than Sediment on EX FIRE HYDRANT
Construction Sites. All pollutants other than sediment that occur on site during construction shall be
handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of storm water.
17. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Financial Liability. Performance bonding, or other
�appropriate ancial instruments, shall be required for all projects to ensure compliance with the approved
erosion and tsediment control plan. [Ord. 3013 § 1, 1995).
APPROVED FOR
o')T
?rJSrTBU0T'ON
City Engigeer Date
A
J_ t-
I I I I I F- N 12 -T- A -7
L F I I-- I N
lklel"rAl I 'rr-kJM^MAM\J n/%f%1/
EX FENCE TO REMAIN
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1) Schedule and attend pre -construction meeting with city inspector.
2) Call 1-800-424-5555 for utililies locate.
3) Install temporary filter fabric fence along perimeter of site as shown on plan.
4) Install temporary rock constnction on entrance.
5) Install temporary inict proteciion for all catch Basins in the vicinity of protect which might get
effected by construction actiNities.
6) Temporary erosion and sedinentations control measures shown are minimum required. As
construction progresses and vnexpected (seasonal) conditions dictates, more siltation control
facilities may be required. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to address any new
conditions that may be created by his constriction activities.
7) Clear site within clearing limits while maintaining the temporary Erosion and sedimentation
control measures.
8) Stabilize and protect disturbcd areas as soon as possible.
9) Grade site in accordance I to approved plans. Limit exposed disturbed soil to 24 hr from Nov I
through April 30 and 5days from May 1 to Oct 3 1. Exposed soil must be protected by
temporary control measures such as mulching, seeding, plastic covering during construction
and also at the threat of rain.
10) Retain sediment within projcct site.
11) No sediment shall be trackee into the public street or on to paved surface. Sediment shall be
removed from trucks and eqdpment prior to leaving site. In the event of failure and transport
of sediment onto paved surfice, street sweeping shall be employed.
12) Install utilities in accordance to approval plan. All trench bedding and bectill shall be in
accordance to city standards.
13) Stabilize and hydro seed / laidscape exposed areas.
14) Maintain TESC facilities unlil all risk of erosion / sedimentation has passed. Do not convey
sediment -laden water into st)rm drainage system. TESC facilities to be removed upon final
site stabilization and inspection.
F—\ I \ /
L_J I V
ILW-VAI I -rr1JMfNnAnV r1l TrM
N I r-\
CONS
Jneer
CTk
LEGAL DESCRIPTION" —
LOT 5, LUSCHEN TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 3, AS PER
PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 87,
RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMiSH, STATE
OF WASHINGTON.
LEGEND
TYPE I CATCH BASIN
FIRE HYDRANT
WATERMAIN VALVE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
POWER POLE
OVERHEAD POWER LINE
MONUMENT
SILT FENCE
FENCE
EXISTING
El
IQ
M
0
0
—OHP—
E)
X_X_X
INSTALL TEMPORARY FILTER
FABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL
MERIDIAN
PLAT
10 5 0 10 20
6monammm! - I - I
I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
PROPOSED
0! P
I EXPIRES 02___1
N
AHMADNIA TRIPLEX
21405 73RD PL W
NASSAR AHMADNIA
SHEET TITLE:
TEMPORARY EROSION 77AND
SEDIMENTATION PLAN
NO. DATE REVISIONS
,ell I
fl '\%
ow�
S-HEET NO. : 7
2 oF
0