The URL can be used to link to this page

21600 HIGHWAY 99 (2).PDF11111111111111 14983 21600 72ND AVE W M E M 0 R A N D U M May 12, 1989 TO: Leigh Francis, Associate Planner FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: KRUGER CLINIC TRAFFIC STUDY Following review of the subject study, I have determined that this development should be responsible for mitigating its impacts on the 212th St. S.W./72nd Ave. W. intersection, using the same criteria and formulas applied in the College Place Study done by Bell -Walker Associates. Local street improvement mitigation is not applicable to this project, as both 216th St. S.W. and Highway 99 currently have curbs and the developer is proposing sidewalk where it does not presently exist. I feel that the contribution for the light at 72nd Ave. W./212th St. S.W. should only be based on the number of P.M. trips generated by this development that would impact that intersection. The number supplied by the developer's traffic engineer is 24 P.M. peak hour trips. Using Bell -Walker's impact fee of $114 per trip results in a mitigation fee of $2,736. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to comment. If you have questions, I'll be glad to help. LF/sdt KRUGER/TXTST530 T H TSANG P A R T N E R S H I P, I N C. Transmittal: K FAX: 0 RELLIVtO MAY - 8 1989 PLAN'"'G DEPT, This transmittal originated from: ASEATTLE 0 TACOMA 1221 SECOND AVENUE 748 MARKET STREET SUITE 330 SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WA 98101 TACOMA. WA 98402 1206 -3044 7 -9383 � 343 2 6 '. �206) 2 2 06 84-9599 206) 383-8059 WE ARE SENDING YOU X_ Attached El Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 0 For approval 0 Reviewed as submitted 0 Resubmit -for review �d For your use 0 Reviewed as noted El Submit copies for distribution )QAs requested [I Returned for corrections 11 Return corrected prints • For review and comment 0 • FOR BIDS DUE 19 El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: :%�k oxe Ut/ COPY TO Rut) , grA�3r SkyKbelm ca� - WD If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. S I G N E D: D04-M "_Out� oopr 10-34 URBAN STREETS WORKSHEET FOR FOUR -LEG INTERSECTIONS Page I Location: 7DI I f'l 'Jr-:. W Name: U-1,rr. (�Jl cr-J, HOURLY VOLUMES Grade % STOPZ 1--7 AZA N=[]:] YIELDE) V12 V1 I V10 N 15 V 6 N=M V N Grade C) % Grade 0% lk V major road V 4 4- �� w 2 CSToptg F N V 7 V8 V9 YIELD 0 16 Date of counts: 0120,1`2 minorroad Time.Period: -1 2rd A,\j Average Running Speed:- PHF: Grade I % VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume (vph) i��ff 3 !�6 13 qlq 1 (9 87 7 o 105 1,-54 Z) 9 0 2- 17 -7 Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 -7 144 VOLUMES IN PCPH ILI �NA v 12 V I I v 10 v 6 NA v 5 v 4 E30 NA vi v 2 NA v v 7 8 v UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 10-35 WORKSHEET FOR FOUR -LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2 F V9 J V12 Minor Street STEP 1: RT From 1/2 V3 + V2 � V�q + Le, 71,2 v ph 1/2 V6 + V5 � V112 -7 vph in +��= 25 conflicting Flows, V, Critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) (sec) 5 -S (sec) _72._�_ Potential Capacity, c. (Fig. 10-3) c,,=.��10 pcph pcph cp.,= . 00 % X 1 Percent of cp Utilized (V"/CP9) x loo % (V12/CP12) Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P P 12 CLCY-L -7 Actual Capacity, c, . cm" = c;'Q pcph -7 Q pcph C�12 = cp12 V, _J V1 STEP 2: . LT From Major Street V3 + V2 = VC4 "C5 + 5LI vph �E2 V6 + VS = V" Ll + vph Conflicting Flows, V, Critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) (sec) — (sec) Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cp 4 pcph cpl= Gin pcph Percen t of c Utilized P (V4/CP4) X 100 12-.-7 % (v1/cP1)x100._ % Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P4 = - 0.9. P, Actual Capacity, q, C�4 � c p4 pcph C"'1=cP,= �e�2i pcph STEP 3: TH From Minor Street V8 V11 Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V3+V2 +V1 +V6 +v,+v4=v,s --7+ '2- 1/2V6+V.� +V4 +V3 +V 2 +V,=V,l I I Q q -7 ( + + 4 _:�- + + L1±4 + I I (D-7 vph =itavph Critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) (sec) (sec) Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) cps 2DL) pcph CPH= lf'Q pcph Percent of cr utilized (V"/Cp,) X 100 % (V /cp ") x 100 = I - L) % Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) Ps = P I � 0, " " Actual Capacity, c, C" = CPA X P1 X P" C�11 cP11 x P, X P, x x X (pcph) X (pcph) STEP 4: LT From Minor Street v 7 V10 L Conflicting Flows, V, - -_ V', (step 3) + I + V 12 = Vc,- 11(a + Z__ + -7 LL� vph VC11 (step 3) + V8 + Vq VC10 U�!!+ vph Critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) _1 D (sec) Lan —3 ID (sec) cpin= ILD pcph Potential Capacity, c. (Fig. 10-3) cf,7 pcph Actual Capacity, c., C-7 Cr" X PI X PI X PI I X P12 IL40 =!��xaa�x C�10 = cP10 x P4 X P1 X P, X P, 91 11L x Ll' x X 2�21 X Lr-1 (pcph) rj�Ll x X,2L�� (pcph) 10-36 URBAN STREETS WORKSHEET FOR FOUR -LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3 . SHARED -LANE CAPACITY CS11 — vi + vil- where 2 movements share a lane (vi/cJ + (vj/c�i) CS11 — v- + V i +vk _ where 3 movements share a lane (vi /c.) + (vjft�j) + (Vkft�k) MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 Movement v(pcph) c,(pcph) c,,(pcph) CR CSH V LOS 7 139 141 8 ID3 L4 7 ck:� �Zpl 9 MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, 12 Movement v(pcph) c,(pcph) c,,,(pcph) CR CS11 V LOS 10 Ll 77 t: 11 -3 28 10,� (12 (do �1) D 12 -7-70 MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1, 4 Movement v (pcph) c, (pcph) CR�Cm V LOS 1 -7 4 50 COMMENTS: 10-34 URBAN STREETS WORKSHEET FOR FOUR -LEG INTERSECTIONS Page I — Location: 72r 4, rt AE WName: HOURLY VOLUMES Grade '3 % IAJI-ffl STOPEL �7.Z -2 N FTI YIELDO V12 V1 I V10 N —Mij i k.,� I -- V6 N vi� N =ED Grade % (D Grade % major road 2 V 3 CFSTOP N V7 V8 V9 YIELD 0 Date of counts: minor road Time Period: PL� FC—(-( Average Running Speed:— PHF: Grade —0—% VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume (vph) (o 77 Y-P z -7 Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 -7 = M====; L 1q 13 VOLUMES IN PCPH 3 N I NA V12 Vil V10 V6 NA N — NA vi V 2 NA V3 7 8 v ILL -LL 20 . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 10-35 WORKSHEET FOR FOUR -LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2 STEP 1: RT From Minor Street F V, J V12 Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2 V3 + V2 = V11 + -925--vph 1/2 V, + V5 V,12 + Z57 vph Critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) `225 - (sec) C-2 :5 - (sec) � 7-7 0 Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-.3) c P, = j3) D pcph cp12 - pcph (V12/Cp12) X 100 0. Percent of cp Utilized (vg/CP9) x 100 P12 Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) Pq = 770 - pcph C�12 = cP1 Actual Capacity, c C.0 � C P9= 19/0 pcph 2 V, —J V1 STEP 2: . LT From Major Street Conflicting Flows, V, V3 + VI = VC' 5H 4/87 49�2 -+— � vph V6 + VS = V'J -L2- + vph Critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) - 65 (sec) 45,5 (sec) Potential Capacity, c. (Fig. 10-3) cp4 = E20 pcph cP1 pcph x 100 % Percent of c Utilized P (v4/cp4) x 100 % (v I /cp,) Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P4 = a P Actual Capacity, ci, C�4 = Cp4 pcph c"" = cP1 pcph STEP 3: TH From Minor Street V8 V11 Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V3+V2+V,+V'+VS+V'=V" + qq 7 + LD + 1/2V,+VI+V4+V3+V2+V'=V" I la+� �'+=+ + qql + 7? LUZ vph ;��7 69 +E��+ (,::2 =L/L2L,-ph critical Gap, T, (Tab. 10-2) le2,�S - (sec) = 1,25 (0 �sec) cP11 1,?D- pcph Potential Capacity, cp (Fig. 10-3) Percent of c. Utilized cpf; -- pcph (vs/crs) x 100 % �Xio= 1.1 % Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10-5) P't P11 Actual Capacity, c. c" cps x P, X P, x cmil cp) I x1P40xP4 (0 x 0. X (pcph) 0 X -222- (pcph) STEP 4: LT From Minor Street. V7 LV 10 Conflicting Flows, V, V,, (step 3) + V,, + V 12 = V,7 1112+ *2 + 7 =ILZ�-,ph V,,, (step 3) + V, + V, U3Z+ -L1 +Z1-';A?W?vph Critical Cap, T,, (Tab. 10-2) 10-3) "*-/, Q (sec) =' 1�/4� -;-' " ) (sec) cP10= 110 pcph Potential Capacity, c,, (Fig. Y pcph Actual Capacity, c- c -=cr'XP1XP4XP1 XP12 rZ/ 0 x 0 x C cP10xP4xP�XP'XP" ((0 x 0-q x xQLffXj2--!�(pcph) �-x(2f/fX =(pcph) 10-36 URBAN STREETS WORKSHEET FOR FOUR -LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3 SHARED -LANE CAPACITY c,11 — vi + vi where 2 movements share a lane (vi/c�) + (vi/C4 v� + v +.v CS" — i _ where 3 movements share a lane (vi /C�i) + (vi/C-i) + (Vkft�k) MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 Movement v(pcph) c_(pcpli) cS11(pcp,1) CR CS11 V LOS -7 /10 IqD .),L, I 190 9-7 2 F-7 8 Ll 17q 1-74 b D 9 2_11;�5, 1 �c7j; -) -8 I-D I A MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11, 12 Movement v(pcph) c,(pcph) c,,,(pcph) CR CSH V LOS 10 _7q �? q IT7 1 12 MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1, 4 Movement v (pcph) c (pcph) CR Cm V LOS 1 -7 bf(D 4 9S COMMENTS: 500 AWDT 212th St. 119 11300 AWDT -487 559, 12400 AWDT. 55 37DO AWDT C\1 SR 99 31300 AWDT 216th St. 29 4Z 161 3900 AWDT 7' C1 17 17 31400 AWDIT 0) Site 7 7 US Figure 2 Kruger Associates Exis(ing PNI Peak Hour Medical Center Inc. Traffic Volumes and Expansion 1989 ANYDT 8ll 8ll �S��O �N�l T T 3 3 S3NV-1 8S ON 8M 83 4T 33T 9T qC iH9I8 0 0 goo 89V O8H1 T3 96 69. TT 8S ON 8M 8� � MWOlOA 3um8l N81S 60lS :ONOORHlOOS g6A| 08]NOJ MIS 6O1S :ONOO8Hl8ON 36Al 70811\103 199M/JSWR :NOTJ3]UIO L]aUlS HOcwW 011-b :B6Ai NO7133SM1NI 081NO3 QNV MAL NOI1JAS8TI1N] ^^^^NOIlM8OINI 1191-110 00/1-009T ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^O3ZAlWNV aOIHl6 MI1 68/61/g ^^^^^^(AA/PP/mm) SISAWNU 71HL 10 1101 W&H AO8OS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^lSAIWNW AH1 90 3WVN ^M QAV ON3L ^^^^^^^l338lS HlOOS/H18ON 3Hl JO MUN ^M^S WAU1S H13T3 ^^^^^^^^^|a]HLS LS9M/190H gH1 SO SWVN 00002 ^^^^^^^^^^^`^^^^^^^^^^NOTLwiO6Ow w9m, 6^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^8Oi7m UOOH AWTI.-J 02 ^^1TIRIHlS UOCM "0336S ONINNDH gSwU9A) ------'---'----------------------------------'--'---------------- NOT1VW80ANl 8NIAM1NAOI T-ehe6 SNUl13134A1NI UWI-INN9lSMO :W3H MY ^ -r ADJUSTMENl FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FUk RIGH[ TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EAST8OUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORlHBDUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPUSITlUN ----'--'--'---------------------------------'--------'----------'-- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND KV*S VEHICLES % MO[ORCYCLES EASTBOUND ___________ 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND O 0 0 SOUlH8OUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT LRI[ICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 SB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 WB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR THROUGHS NB 6.30 6.50 0.00 6.50 S8 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7,00 7.00 0.00 7.00 SB 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ..... ..... _____________________________ NAME OF THE EAS[/WEST STREET...... 212TH STREET S.W. NAME OF THE NORlH/SOU7H SlREET.... 72N8 AVE. W. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5/19/89 ; 1600-1700 OTHER INFORMATION.... ' ~ CAPACllY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVlCE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RA|E CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPPCI[Y CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 117 126 110 THROUGH 0 156 139 RIGHT 149 811 811 MINOR SlREEl' SB LEFT 26 1o4 81 THROU8H 0 154 137 RIGH}� 21 775 7/5 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 13 533 533 WB LEFT 84 585 585 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 110 > -7 > F > 214 139 > -53 139 >F D > 811 > 661 > A > 81 / > 135 137 > / 775 > 533 585 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST SlREET...... 212TH STREET S.W. NAME OF THE NORTH/SUUTH STREET.... 72ND AVE. W. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 5/19/89 ; 1600-1700 O[HER INFORMATION.... 55 > E 38 137 >E D 754 > A 520 H 500 A 19851 HEM: UNSIGNALIZED 114TERSECTIONS Paae-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 17,0000 14AME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... 212TH STREET S.W. 14AIIE OF THE NORTHISOUTH STREET ....... 72ND AVE. W. NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. GORDY HYDE DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (ram/dd/yy) ...... 5119189 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1600-1700 OTHER INFORMATION .... INTERSECTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/OEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP 6161-1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB MB SB LEFT 11 69 87 21 THRU 468 555 0 0 RIGHT 35 15 105 17 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- LmqES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Paqe-21 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE A14GLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 )o SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X SU TRUCKS X 'COMBINATION AND RVIS VEHICLES X MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 .0 0 ER111CAL GAPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-21) 'VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- HINGIR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ NB 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 c.ro SB 5.50 0.00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 151.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 WB ri.clo 5.50 0.00 5.50 MINOR THROUGHS 14B 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 SB 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.50 MINOR LEFTS 14B 7.00 7.00 0.00. 7.00 SB 7.00 7.00 0100 7.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMAIION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ...... 212TH STREET S.W. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET .... 72ND AVE. W. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS ..... 5 J119/89 ; 1600-1700 OTHER INFORMATION.... C KAPACITY A14D LEVEL--OF-SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 106 126 110 > 110 > 4 ) E THROUGH 0 156 137 > 207 139 -25 137 '/F D RIGHT 1128 all all oil 682 ) A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 26 107 85 > Bc j 59 > E THROUGH 0 154 137 > 141 .137 95 137 >E D R16HT 21 775 775 %/ 775 > 754 > A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 17 533 533 533 520 A WB LEFT 84 car 1 11 585 585 500 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ...... . 212TH STREET S.W. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET .... 72ND AVE. W. HE A DATE AND TIME OF T ANALYSIS ..... 5/19/99 ; 1600-1700 OTHER INFORMATION.... I wl. . ��fv, I ;, �7,�t vn.: 0; CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 980110 - (206) 771-3202 ---& -� -7 7 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Works * Planning e Parks and Recreation * Engineering DiRECIOR , 8 9 0 - 19 L) February 19, 1991 Department of Ecology 4350 150th Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Doug Knutson Re: Request for —determination of the need for a State discharge Tr permit attrCruger Clinicil '4 Dear Mr. Knutson: Enclosed are letters from an applicant for a building permit describing the chemicals that would be discharged to the sanitary sewer system in the City of Edmonds from a medical clinic. Please let me know if a State discharge permit is required for this discharge. If you have any questions, please call me at the above number. Sincerely, MR ��'W I Bob Bower cc:"Bob Alberts * 11, 1890 a Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan ILE; M E M 0 R A N D U M June 20, 1989 TO: Dan Smith, Engineering Inspector FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator q SUBJECT: ADB REVIEW ADB 3,5149: Exit onto 238th cannot be relocated and must be improved with curb, gutter and sidewalks to match existing road section. Southerly driveway approach off of 99 must be signed as entrance only. Planter island can be enlarged. ADB 77-89: Parking lot must be designated two-way. Slopes, cross sections and driveway centerline profile must be provided. Also, worst case parking stall. ADB 36-89: ADB 69-89: Need cross section of site. Need slopes, not just grades. Need worse case parking stall detail. Alley must be designated one-way for this project to take primary access. ADB 70-89: Need grades, need centerline of driveway profile. Off -alley parking should be perpendicular to alley. ADB 71-89 Need grades, centerline of driveway profile and worst case parking lot slopes. ADB 41-89 Driveway width can be reduced to 24'. GCH/sdt ADBREVW/TXTST530 m ins M Iwo ME NO wo OWWO M�Mww M-0100 v —4" MOMMON PENNON MOMMENIMEMEM IN 0 0 WIN 10 RMOMM MENOMINEE! memo MEN MEMNON EMMONS MENEM! EMMONS win NNIMMIN MIN SOMMER IMMINNOM 1�100106 MOMMIN annam MMMM/M ENEMIES MINIMUM MUM#] 2M 11!MlllZ& small Ma 11DOMOMMIN WA;&-J[ozea MOMMIN MUMMER 70 Al- ! I �,s �,w _\A 34 - 0 p P) cu �--i ED P-) P +b2 OH H 0 CA L e_ A FeV. 7- 3 - -74 t _0 K I, I im .... ..... 6 Ir_ C) �,j c, e: F\ d FacToT2, -ro vi4�—� 5 E: A L I,'-- I<- a D -5, i-1, N� D\ �) 9 �'_:'AT �4 F_ 9 �J E V\1 PAV I NJ Ci 7Z 0 < co b(f U_ >1 CL)Fe, 4- 51DE:vvALf-�. --HALL C0NJF'0PM S-T'ANJF_DAFKD IDRA�Vl��Cj NJO, R_' 5TD ICO '5�CTJCN -rp[ L I G7H ST 3W 11,=101 �Xlcil, 50" Ivi nN 5110D_�i, �i_5TDR�4, wo�,If� IT 72 ric,, 7i---\ FLOvv i�x I �;;, �/, t4 v '5 4 1 lb NO f N TE� 12- 11 `DTUZ-N� LANE LON He,W 12"CONC-, OT-1 L,&Ne '*--- L� - �A IN PA P) K _� H C[ OF) � V F,� P-) 0 CEG - H E_� F -I. H A Ll No 4; �P-T,5 �72 ... . . . . .. CA.; w lz 6omp rl'p�w NIP. 11:11PT p jo, X, _2 1-07W Pi-r .0- 271, S' C) _A if co cy) co Lo AH r > < C 00 0 0, N-1 0. cri "c) 00 0 Aj CL) M z C) - C) 0 z uj U) < w J: =) 0 Lo > UJI uj ui LC c NOA VO -T- CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPT. Examined by Date F, A 1�j tN ci 0 Remarks son -T, )p LJ Lr r,,! 72 5CALr 0 - 10, J, D F C�, i C, o, 1,4 c- r,--F-T E� �5 L, (,�C, 0 P, P F� e, 7 P P A', ',�E \NM4 c-ONC�2-F-E" `ZPAL�1,, NL� PRtE*:,'�'*11L-,;-(,JJT /N PA-ZAF.�:) 4. 3"WAT5K .H�15: MAT591AL SWAL-L, 5_� CL 000 P\/c(S0L\,/6N—) CEW15N—i N Cr� �R_ T 5� JOIN-rE) or--� AS 4PPROVEC) �_D H C,, W A L, K 5y 145 GI-ry o5 5C)MONC)5, 6UF�r:�) 5Y- PA55 \/ALV� -To F5 Q �4 P-4, -1� IT-! 11"! 7- A I [a ON 7?_ AVE. VV. _r D WE \/v 6" D. I 15 C4 /Aa VVATE5R MA)N co I r—) c� w4 13 A L IF