The URL can be used to link to this page

21600 HWY 99F SNOHONIIS0 "FIR "T Serving Brier, Ed,,flU,)*, U11M Mountlake Prrace www.FireDistr.ictI.org LOCATION: 21600 Highway 99 Bldg 98026 BUSINESS NAME: Kruger Clinic Building MAILING' ADDRESS: 21600 Highway 99, Edmonds, WA 98026 BUSINESS OWNER: Kauffman, Jeff EMERGENCY-1: KEY ACCESS-2: EMAIL: PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRE SYSTEMS: AS (Partial) 5/14 FA 8/14 FE 8/14 12:00:00 AM & 00 'FIRE,PREVENTION 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT Everett, WA 98208 0 EDMONDS OBRIER Phone (425) 551-1200 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE [I UNINCORPORATED Fax (425) 551-1272 L PHONE: 4258834955 HOME PHONE: HOME PHONE: HOME PHONE: 16 FREOUENCY -F-STATION & SHIFT Annual I 16-D SCHEDULED Jan 2017 DATE DUE UFIR 1, 509 CURRENT CITY YES NO BUSINESS 9-1 1:1 LICENSE 11", INITIAL INSPECTION DATE ........ .. GUARDIAM BECUR17Y r, lAh Oil) Fire Oeoartment I?111! Film A— ',it, 54 IS Prov- rRc#204 16al Keorucky Stzmq CONFIDENCE TESTING itic.Cii-WA 08134 53wnlalo,'NA sG3113 90223 1400 MIMS M,92-37U 344-847-01111 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (CTF-8) Lic. 4 GUARCS K3_1K& 1.866,368AM Dato of Inspertion 6- -1.6 �acilltv 'ji,7 LT i, r) -z-f 60-0 , * e- e- 9' j�4i,4�7 Address iy& ------ i7c) I 7— S-- �63 EviciigOwner Ll -- nlorle* MAIN FIRE CONTROL PANEL CHE!j�S -'-/L-AnnijaJ �emlqWkwl Quriely gii-hiiwth�, Nor.th1v--.: S. 21. Nn. ai bilialing Girojits ........ . . . .. No, of SignalLIS r, �p jj j;? ,..swlicBauvr %lor.-.Hj V2 d. Saaari IAAL;iyes Urdai Lfad -w!Signsl D%-iceS Operating-' 93 04 in cl�,wqi; qrcu t V6!.,-*Q.:' aafie;� Te g blj*r�Ntin 1):, :.:7- .. L". -1 Tip ut.,asignal %v;AC Fowar O�,-. N. 9A Explain: ;,Y1 Orcuirs Upie:a-fe-.Z�a�E*-ti)ry . NA 8: X1 CiTUV415 (:k�e.-WB Ciili!iladury On AC Power: .SK;5 C:i jjo E MIA Ex-plaln: S'. A-i C1 %its CW*ei�W' *F-,v 8ocl;i 3417V=-b�ii� -a; J cxp 15. C,�nn F�ari,Rl ajp.t*�i maria Per Manuladwees frViu0jons: :Rlyer. EI No C: WA 11. A! Auxiliary Equipmer-, Operates -F�Ic�a=�JHYAC Fat, iJivt Ov�m, t4i--t clmurcs,. drit aarrper4 tc,), Yet j L63AI , m W iir� S, *** -d �n` 13 Wc.ni�uring SUfirsi.;h rin 2-y" -.1 No CIVA ExWain� "A P1310 �jj Yes: - 0?1b LlifA'A -eplaln; I --j. Parel K?y AvFdl.4bl8'. .2�yg. - ,I mo C, WA Explain: splairi: 1 TOVVSecv;ce Flumd vt Fim. Aqrm CWT01 PL11ral: Fl:i-Yt, -1 No 1i no, where 7 EQUIPMENT TYPE % No, OF uwfs RESUL119 No. Of uNrrs V4,B r L ING tetS E Audlo (3ai a, Horns. Ghir"s, Vbic� Alarm- Speakpr%) Y., No— ic" A i j,-iW,/i5 u 4 0 e vkip s YaE 77-. Yia f ND L ------- !k- H eat D-- L- rs 4 Yes ND 4-1,�xr kill Stagunig Troul�-- 114 C*WGIS yes �W- No f ------ - i Yes L. No ALI-� Doer Unlooks (Fail Sete Cpemton) Yft* NO f" xiwVi Firef5mc*9 Uamper. (Voililatfon C4Drt,:)Js'- yes No FiTernaris Rioles Yes No .7 yk No Clavato., Caplirfe P)ase yes Y..: 6eneralcr 3180S Y65 L 4PS Aul-wriatc 5^,kli,-r Superrisory Swit--has Yet No y (;LW,tr3j V�J-�P qjjiiLMS4:jry SWtt&,M Y" No._ Fitc Dupartmut IA:)ni:loftq Yes No 7 1� 7 Name GfAlam Morr!.V;n� Company :,Nd This Certifies that this fire alarm system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the items listed in this report, is consistunt with ffro alarm maintenance standards, discrepancies are noted and have been rep�lolrlod 10 uilding,056er/Manager for correctIve Action, -)S!rL R-6�8(�dj, 6C-Ire. 7!,;,. Cv �ager V (a Z--7 Ucense 9 Problems Faund: Comactior- Made, Data By: — --- --- Proprietary and Confidential Westfall, John From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:59 AM To: Westfall, John; Zweber, Kevin Subject: FW: Kruger Clinic FYI From: Chris Toncray [mailto:CToncray(cbTGBArchitects.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:54 AM To: kzwerber(-aflredistrictl.org; l3jorback, Leif Cc: Richard Lastimosa; Kent Gregory Subject: Kruger Clinic Leif and Kevin: I imagine by now you have visited the construction site at Kruger Clinic. I visited as well - it's the first time I have seen it since the demolition was done. I was pretty shocked by the extent of construction that is not close to what was documented on the drawings. I can imagine that this less-tha n-com pliant construction extends throughout the original half of the building. I am going to the project OAC meeting tomorrow and will address with the owner, tenant, and contractor the extent to which the construction does not match what was directed by the original documents. I am sure the question will be "What are we going to need to do, to continue on with the project?" And I will tell them that we need to come to some kind of agreement with the building department as they are charged with the public safety. We have discussed the difficulty of trying to make everything conform to what would be a Type V-1HR building in 1985 or in 2015, as the original building would need to be renovated from top to bottom. I don't know if you have any idea about what would be acceptable to you. I have a notion that encasing all the new and existing construction within our space with 5/8" type X gypsum board, all the way up to but not including the joists would give us a level of fire -protection that is FAR beyond what is currently in place, and thus would be an improvement in safety. We would use fire -rated ceilings as currently detailed. I imagine the client may choke on an expense like this which is far beyond what anyone expected to spend - but no one expected to find a building in this kind of shape. But I don't think anything less than this could give you any sense that the project is similar to 1-HR construction. if you think that something less or different is a sufficient approach, please make a suggestion. Let me know your thoughts, so we can let the owner make an informed decision about the status of the project. Thanks for your time and assistance, ct Christopher Toncray Architect tgb I architects www.tqbarchitects.com - - - - - - EX. F Ek FA 201 FIRE LANE EX. FH F FH A- AMBULANCE ACCESS ONLY FH 20 FIRE LANE EX FH I:r PRI TEFH F /x 07/02/7013 S � "AlT 622-W2 f. (M) 622-0 1. 20'WIDE FIRE LANE. 15(Y MAX FROM BUILDING 2. RADIU& ll'INSIDE, 42' OUTSIDE 3. 150'DEAD END FIRE LANE ALLOWED 4. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 50'FROM BUILDING BEING SERVED, SPACED AN AVERAGE OF 300' 5. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR BUILDINGS PER IFC, APPENDIX D al-"Ge�o- CL-Ivlc- / / z)&cx EX, FH EX. LEGEND DISH EDMONDS AMBULATORY CARE CENTER EET EDMONS. WASIVIINON FIRE PROTECTION AND ACCESS 7, FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT 'Serihig Brier,:'��dtizoizds, atid 12425 Meridiatz Ave S. SNOilo CO. MRIM 1 0 EDMONDS '.$4 . Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 9�208 OBRIER F11 TE '.s� Phoize'(425) 551-1200 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE STR!RT wwwFireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 0 UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIF'**' LOCATION: 21600. Highway 99 Bldg 98026 Annual 16-B BUSINESS NAME: Kruger Clinic Building PHONE: 4258834955 SCHEDULEDJan 2015 DATE DUE MAILING UFIR � 509 ADDRESS: 21600 Highway 99, Edmonds, WA 98026 BUSINESS OWNER: Kauffman, Jeff HOME PHONE: A EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: 'CURRENT / 'd KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY S No EMAIL: BUSINESS LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: 1 rimr_0T0Ir-IVI0. AZ�t,�-artiai).'3114t-Ab/14t-tb/l�3 [-ULKtSOX(:e) r't�5_- ell 't5V/ -� 0// f R/I I HAZARDS FOUNE) AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 11 d 142 �� I f V i /�_ r / F V I t" I YV /c� C_ 2 3 3 V0 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTEDTO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: D E: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 1 5 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 CODE 5 2 6 2 6 DATE: SECTION: RETURN RECEWT 6 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED DISPOSITION: 4 8 4 '8 1 DATE: LETTER NEEDED [-] YES F-1 NO LETTER NEEDED C] YES F-1 NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY OV E D& CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 44, PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 STATUS: ISSUED 10/28/2014 PernIlit #: BLI)2014,10921, Expiration Date: 04/28/2015 '-� _�"Project Address; 21600 ]FHGHWW?��PM�ONR& L i Parcel No:-00580700002900 PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT CO11TRACT*R KRUGER CLINIC GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS C/O KRUGER LLC GRE 1743 1 ST AVE S 1743 1 ST AVE S 2801 ALASKAN WAY STE 3 10 SEATTLE, WA 98134 SEATTLE, WA 98134 SEATTLE, WA 98121 (206) 349-5 889 (206) 349-5889 LICENSE #: GUARDSS16 I N9 EXP:07/01/2016 ADD 4 FIRE ALARM DEVICES TO EXISTING FACP SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPBCTION VALUATION: $0.00 PERMIT TYPE: Commercial PERMIT GROUP: 79 - Fire Alarm GRADING: N CYDS: 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: OCCUPANT GROUP: OCCUPANT LOAD: FENCE: 0 X 0 FT.) CODE: 2012 OTHER - ------- OTHER DESC: IZONE: NUMBER OF STORIES: 0 1 VEST ED DATE: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 0 ILOT BASEMENT: 0 1 ST FLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR: 0 BASEMENT: 0 1 ST FLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR: 0 13RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0 3 RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK:O . OTHER:O IBEDROOMS: 0 BATHROOMS: 0 BEDROOMS: 0 BATHROOMS: 0 FRONT S LTBACK SIDES17BACK REAR S ETBACK REQUIRED: PROPOSED: ----7RE—QUIRED: PROPOSED: --- rRE —QU I R E D: PROPOSED: HEIGHT ALLOWED:O PROPOSED:O IREQUIRED: PROPOSED: SETBACK NOTES: PERmrr APPROVAL I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. T HIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS/HER DEPUTY AND ALL FEES ARE PAID. Lii4a -17101-ilq4t octoft�- 2s, 201L� Signature Print Narne Date Released By Date ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND,APPROVAL ORA CER110 OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/ 1BC1 10/ IRCI 10. F RE Py ONLINE APPLICANT ASSESSOR = OTHER MOONsee—.. 0 .— GUARDIAN SECURITY [3 Sit"'dial C) Bellingham IS76423"Firin Avenue South 5435 Pro:osl Rd 0204 1501 Kentucky Street Seattle. WA 98134 Silvedal., WA 38383 Bellingham, WA 98229 1400-282-6 998 360492-3738 360-6,47-011110 Lic, # GUARDSS233K5 1400-356-1005 r % EAM04" Fire Department CONFIDENCE TESTING FIRE 11f,1M SYSTEM (CTF-8) Date of Inspection % I I iit Facility EN ill 11 A E-01 4A Le-f-111 ( 14 - IJA Addre! Building Owner ri ti llvq(At� A vftf —. MAIN FIRE CONTROL PANEL CIHEI;KS� Annual Cj- Semi -Annual 1. Control Panel Manufacturer e, Or J�t�44 2. No. of Initiating Circuits No. 'of Signaling 4 4 E- 3. Static Battery Voltages: 91 24.1 #2 — 93— — 4. Battery Voltages Under Load w/Si al De ices Operating: #1 #2 #3 #4 5. Charge Circuit Voltage: 7-3 - I — Battery Test Duration: mine. 6. Trouble Signal w1AC Power Off: W Yes 0 No 0 N/A 7. All Circuits Operate Satisfactory On Standby (Battery) Power: JkYes Ohio 0 NIA 8. AJI Circuits Operate Satisfactory On AC Power: Yes 1:1 No 0 NIA 9. All Circuits Checked For Electrical Supervision: Yes ONo 0 NIA iYes 10. Control Panel Checks Made Per Manufacturers Instructions: 0 No (3 NIA Phone# 246-730-0—:5 — 10 Quarterly 0 Ell -Monthly :1 Monthly Model S206 I Explain: 11. All Auxiliary Equipment Operates (Elevators, HVAC Fan shut down, Door closures, Vent dampers, Etc.): Kyes C1 No [I N/A Explain: 12. Does Alarm System Meet Audibility Standards: It Yes 0 No 0 WA Explain: 13. Monitoring Station Alarm Circuit(s): KYos 1:1 No C-1 NIA Explain: 14. Alarm Delay Function (if installed) Operates Property: [:; Yes Ohio PJLWA Explain, 15. Panel Key Available: J1 Yes ONo 0— Explain: 16. Operating Instructions at Panel: RLYs Ditto 0 NIA Explain: 17. Test/Service Record at Fire Alarm Control Panel: fj(Yes C3 No if no, where filed? EOUIPMENT TYPE Audio (Bells, Horns, Chimes, Voice Alarm Speakers) Visual Alarm Devices Audio/Visual Devices Smoke Detectors Heat Detectors Manual Pull Stations Trouble Indicators Annunciators Auto Door Unlocks (Fail Safe Operation) Auto Door Release Fire/Smoke Dampers (Ventilation (;ontrols) Duct Detectors LSD -fvkA. Firemans Phones Public Address System Elevator Capture Phase #1 Phase #2 Generator Starts Automatic Sprinkler Flow Switches Automatic Sprinkler Supervisory Switches Automatic Sprinkler Valve Tamper Switches Control Valve Supervisory Switches Exterior Water Motor-Bell/Gong Fire Department Monitoring Monitoring Station-Skinal received Name of Alarm Monitoring Company Other NO, OF UNITS RESULTS TESTED Yes X No Yes X No NO. OF UNITS Yes No Yes No 9 Yes No 9 to Yes No 10 2. Yes X No 2 Yes No t Yes No Yes No Yes Li No Yes No Yes No Yes NP,� Yes ko, — Yes No Yes Yes-// No No Yes No as No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No —)e-- Yes NO This Certifies that this fire alarm system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the items listed In this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance standards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the Ing Owner/Managerjor c9rr 0 Action. Signature of. Facility OwnerlManager Signature'DrTn WlTeOnician WV Technician Electrical Licen Technician Certification Problems Found: Correction Made: Date Corrected By: Rev. 06/11/02 Proprietary and Confidential SNOHOMIS19 CO. DISTR Servin Brier.iEdinondk, dnd Moundake Terrace ETWWW.FireDistrictl - org --- LOCATION: AIM Highmay QQ* BkI QM26 BUSINESS NAME: KrLigcr Clinic Building MAILING ADDRESS: 21 EDO I lighlAray DO.'EcIrminds, VVA 08026 BUSINESS OWNER: KatiffIrmn.. Jetff EMERGENCY-1: KEY ACCESS-2: EMAIL: PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRESYSTEMS: J\,S71-11 A 7/1, 7/11 _LL13FD Lk &,Y .57 112425 Meridian Ave S Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 Fax (425) 551-1272 I:iw ug HOME PHONE: HOME PHONE: HOME PHONE: 11 FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT A[�DMONDS El BRIER 11 MOUNTOKE TERRACE [I UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY I STATION 1, SHIF_"l Annua 16-A SCHEDULED Jan 2014 DATE DUE � UFIR II, CURRENT CITY YES NO BUSINESS LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE :3 �'7///7/ HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS :2 2 'R u I w2 t--y S' Mar p Iz y� uxr--p 2 AC-1.7A41, _fcz�_ u e�ev f 64,� 742Z,21Z 11 f x ,t- 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOV( VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X lst RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE D JE: DATE DUE: GRANTEDTO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 1 5 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 CODE 5 2 6 2 6 DATE: SECTION: RETURN RECEIPT 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED 6 DISPOSITION: 7 4 8 I 4 8 DATE: \� LETTER NEEDED E] YES [I NO LETTER NEEDED [] YES NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY John J. Wesffall 2-/600 4�491 From: Haven, Erika [EHaven@healthcarerealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 4:29 PM To: John J. Westfall Subject: RE: Woundcare Kruger Clinic Vs. Class 11 Standpipes Hello John — I just wanted to let you know that the common area fire hoses have been removed and capped, the cabinet has been removed and the wall drywalled. This work was done by Andersen Construction who also did this in the Wound Care Clinic. Have a great day, Erika From: John 3. Westfall [maiIto:iwestfaIIC@firedistrictl.org] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 9:08 PM To: Haven, Erika Cc: 'kyleanderson@andersen-const.com' Subject: RE: Woundcare Kruger Clinic Vs. Class II Standpipes You're welcome. There are two in the Wound care space, the second is at the SE corner outside patient rooms in clinic. This works out best for all. John From: Haven, Erika [mailto:EHavenCa)healthcarerealty.com Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:57 PM To: John 3. Westfall; 'kyleanderson@andersen-const.com' Cc: Kevin Zweber; Brad Reading; Bjorback, Leif Subject: RE: Woundcare Kruger Clinic Vs. Class Il Standpipes Hello John, Thank you for your email. There are 5 of these fire hoses in the common areas and I'm looking at 3 options and am obtaining pricing: 1. Remove hose and cap, leave the cabinet and place a fire extinguisher in there 2. Remove hose and cap, remove the cabinet and drywall 3. Leave in place and have serviced In the Swedish tenant improvement space there is one fire hose, I believe the route they will be going is to have Andersen Construction decommission the cabinet and drywall over the hole. We are fine with this. I will let you know what I decide regarding the building hoses. I appreciate you bringing this to our attention. Thank you, ERIKA HAVEN Healthcare Realty ana� g AssetN1 er 1231 116 1h Avenue NE, Suite 120 Bellevue, Washington 98004 P: 425.450.9065 From: John 1. Westfall [mailto:iwestfall(�)firedistrictl.orcI Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:33 PM To: 'kyleanderson@andersen-const.com'; Haven, Erika Cc: Kevin Zweber; Brad Reading; Bjorback, Leif Subject: Woundcare Kruger Clinic Vs. Class II Standpipes Ref: 21600 Highway 99 Erika Haven is property manager for Health Care Realty. Kyle Anderson is project super for Wound Care tenant improvement. Kyle: Thanks for the question about decommissioning the standpipe cabinets in the project area. I reviewed the Kruger address file at the fire department. The original requirements for the Kruger Clinic included a class 11 standpipe installation required by UBC (1988) Table 38-A for the purpose of group 132 occupancy (office) greater than 20,000 s.f. per floor (actual measure for Kruger was 45,000 s.f. across both floors). A class 11 standpipe consists of 100' hose hand lines in cabinets covering all portions of the building are within 30' of a nozzle. The hoses require periodic pressure testing, drying, and re -hanging. I have no records that has been accomplished. The fire marshal at the time of construction suggested a class III arrangement that would also provide a function for responding firefighters. The suggestion was not taken. His comment was that a class 11 standpipe is intended for occupant use only, much like a fire brigade, or organized response private response team. At this date, I know no such group and with Snohomish County FD#1 now serving your fire emergency needs and alternative features for use by private persons, an organized brigade is neither necessary nor recommended. My suggestion to you is remove the hose hand lines, decommission and cap the water connections, and know that you have fire extinguishers for private use where needed for a fire emergency. Kruger Clinic also has an automatic fire alarm system monitoring the corridors on both levels. Stevens (now Swedish) hospital was given the same approval about 1S years ago to remove their hose hand lines from service in the hospital tower. I would like Erika's approval for Kyle to remove standpipes in TI area, and Erika's assistance to decommission those in the rest of the building. Please acknowledge your receipt of this information and a timeline proposal to accomplish the task. John 3. Westfall Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services 425-771-0213 Desk 425-775-7721 Fax 425-231-3644 Mobile KNOKOWS11 co AMR IRE , I DISTRtvw,T COMMON +568 s.f. )ND M&CALCULATION5 N&rTO SC !!I�o 01 AM "UL'tR CLINIC - MA CALCULATIONS 21600 HDWAy 99 EDMOWQ.. ."W.-AWNGTON .98028 - -- - -- -�,-rW,7 W.T. 13 A-2 FIRE PREVENTION Serving Brier, Edmonds 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT OMISH CO. FIRE Mountlake Terrace, and, Everett, WA 98M 0 EDMONDS El BRIER DISThlt� IfT the Town of Woodway Phone (425) 551-1200 OWOODWAY [I MOUNTLAKE TERRACE www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 [1 UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIF'*' LOCATION: 21600 Highway 99 365 16 D I B U S I gff SS - N AM E: Kruger Clinic Bldg PHONE: 4258834955 SCHEDULED 01/01/13 DATE DUE MAILING c/o Ronda Hull UFIR ii, 5D9 1157 ADDRESS: 98073 BUSINESS OWNER: Monis Piha Prop Mgmnt HOME PHONE: 4256433400 PREFIRE EMERGENRY-1: nKauffman, Jefr HOME PHONE: 42577624111 "CURRENT KEY ACCES8-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YESt NO BUSINESS El LICENSE PERSON CONTACTE I D: INITIAL INSPECTION OATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRE FA 8/07 IFb LkBx FE fj i_1_7 SYSTEMS: 7//7 o ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS If CIE. —144. 4 '4L IV 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONT'CTED:f PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATO_�j-2,( a DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 L) 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 18 4 18 DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 LETTER NEEDED C] YES NO LETTER NEEDED YES NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY SNOHOMISH CO. ---------- Serving B4ei; Edmonds Mountlake Terraceand the Town of Woodway www.FireDistrictl.org FIRE PREVENTION 12425'Mer'idian Ave S INSOECTION REPORT Everett, WA 98208 OEDMONDS 0 BRIER Phone (425) 551-1200 0 WOODWAY 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE Fax (425) 551-1272 0 UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIF`) LOCATION: 21600 Highway 99 365 16 C I BUSINESS NAME: Kruger Clinic Bldg PHONE: 4253834955 SCHEDULED DATEDUE � 01101/12 MAILING c!o Ronda Hull LIFIR � 509 1157 ADDRESS: 98073 BUSINESS OWNER: Morris Piha Prop Mgmnt HOME PHONE: 4256438400 PREFIRE EMERGENCY-1: "Kauffman, Jeff" HOME PHONE.. 42577624 18 CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS El 1:1 LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR:, FIRE FA Bib7 FD LkBx FE 8/) SYSTEMS: 7 _` I 1 0 K ANNUAL 1 11 HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS /COM NICATIONS 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TMCO'FfIRE(�T THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 4 18 4 18 DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 11 LETTER NEEDED E] YES El NO I LETTER NEEDED [] YES NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5-AVENUE N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (425) 771-0215 FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATION: 21600 Highway 99 BUSINESS NAME: Kruger Clinic Bldg MAILING c/o Ronda Hull FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY PHONE: 4258834955 ADDRESS: 93073 BUSINESS OWNER: Morris Piha Prop Mgmnt HOMEPHONE: 4256438400 EMERGENCY-1: uKauffman, Jefr HOME PHONE: 4257762418 KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT 365 1 16 6 SCHEDULED 01/01/11 DATE DUE 01 UFIR � 509 -1157 PREFIRE I INITIAL INSPECTION DATE PERSON CONTACTED: 0 NAME OF INSPECTOR: A.) 6 Z_ 0 Z- FIRE FA 8/07 f(D LkW FE _y /_�o SYSTEMS: q/j C) '__ — ANNUAL HAZARDS -FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE 10 VIOLATION CODE 2 6 F,,A-) /T 5 2 14 YZC) U6 /4 0 C) -T- 3 3 4 L-110 "1 0-, U*"'f N eL— A 0 4 '-A I I d -40 f 4 5 5 6 6 7 7/. 8 8 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE- . INSPECTION J DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED- 46 0-- PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE DATE* DATE: 3 OL IONS 1 5 MOLAnONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4- IS 4 18 DATE: DISPOSITION: 8 %,LETTER NEEDED E] YES NO LETTER NEEDED E] YES D NO FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY A C1W OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (425) 771-0215 FIRE DEPARTMENT 1� 1 2' pbl S9 z . d FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY LOCATION: 21600 Highway,99 BUSINESS NAME: Kruger Clinic Bldg PHONE: 4258334955 MAILING c/oRondaHull FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT� 365 16 A SCHEDULED DATE DUE 110 UFIR 1� r ,09 1157 ADDRESS: 98073 BUSINESS OWNER: HOME- PHONE:_ 4256438400 PREFIRE Morris Piha Prop Mgm�t EMERGENCY- 1: "Kauffman, JefF HOMEPHONE: 4257762418 kEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: T71 I -a"- �-� / f AIL� r-v— f Jj-�r INITIAL INSPECTION DATE !PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR: S FIRE FA 8/117 FD LkBx FE /Voc? SYST EMS: L 0 710 ANNUAL 'HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE 10 "j k-e v 'Poc—s' -IT VIOLATION CODE 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 It"e, '/"f_ 8 'Ist RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR/ INSPECTOR: A14V� INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: cl& ///0 L DATE: '7 la DATE: 3 I A4 VIOLATIONS 5 /6k:210LATIONS 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 7 4 18 4 18 DATE: DISPOSITION: 8 ,.LETTER NEEDED [] YES No LETTER NEEDED 0 YES C] NO FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY I - 14:38 AMS FAX NO, 2063644136 2111198 AWN OOMITORING SERVICE, INC. DETAILED ACCOUNT ACTIVITY PRINTOUT(222) INST 0 TO 999999 ACtT$ 55021t TO SS0211 02/11/�S THROUGH 02111198 169 (GS) (OL) OLYMPIC ALARN CS ACCT: $60211 Klu6ER CLINIC ALT 10�,. 21600 H16HUAY 09 Envolos WA 98116 02111/9t 14;33;07 COMMENT: IL$; JOEL SWEET kjCS# .02/11/98 14.38-97 KIS 42tt 2— CLEAR TEST &am 02111198 1402:61 103 1203 T9008LE CANCEL :C 'IT 163 42/11158 14;3?:S? 102 1203 TROUBLE CANCEL :C IT R@2 02111108 140247 R*3 120S TROUBLE CANCEL :C IT R93 f2/1119Z 102-67 T63 1252 -TROVILE 4 IT T03 42/11198 14:32:67 02 1$25 l!FIvE :F IT 402 02/11198 M2711 T03 1162 :TROUBLE -.W IT T0 42111191 14;18;26 R83 1263 TROUBLE CANCEL :C IT M 13;54:40 Y*3 1252 ;TROUBLE ;0 IT T03 .02111/96 13:50:5$ CONIENT: KLS: JOEL SWEET WICSI 42111/98 13:61:55 KLS 4.210 am PLACE 01 TEST am CAT: 1 $2111/98 13:60:55 COMMENT: TEST:ALL FRI 21198 1700 END OF REPORT P. 01 PA61 n 05/05/96 16:55:44 PRINT REQUESTED BY TERMINAL EFT040 Incident History for: #EF96000866 �� Case Numbers: $EF96001124 $TF960008078� Entered 05/02/96 19:38:36 BY SCT004 SC721 Dispatched 05/02/96 19:39:07 BY SCT004 SC721 Enroute 05/02/96 19:39:00 Onscene 05/02/96 19:42:59 Closed 05/02/96 21:52:40 Initial Type: HAZTEC Initial Alarm Level: 1 Final Alarm Level: Final Type: HAZMAT (HAZMAT TEAM RESPONSE) Pri: 1 Dispo: Police BLK: E009 Fire BLK: EF157 Map Page: 455B-6 Group: EF1 c: T Loc: K ,EDM high xst: 216 ST SW (V) Loc Info: Name: STA 7 /1938 (SC721 ) ENTRY /1939 DISP E10 /1939 $ASNCAS E10 y1939 ASST E9 /1939 $ASNCAS E9 /1939 ASST U6 /1939 ASST EDC /1939? ENROUT E10 /1941 ASSTER A10 /1941 ENROUT E9 /1942 ONSCNE A10 /1942 ONSCNE E10 /1943 ENROUT EDC /1943 MISC E10 /1944 /1945 y1946 /1946 /1948 /1949 /1952 /2000 /2001 /2001 /2002 ONSCNE MISC $PREMPT ONSCNE MISC ONSCNE ONSCNE MISC MISC BALNCE ASST /2006 MISC E10 U6 U6 E9 EDC E10 E10 E10 HAZ5 HAZ5 Addr: Phone: Beat: MD01 Sr ,REQ HAZTECH RESPONSE F/POSS MOBILE METH LAB - P D ONSCENE #EF0447 HERYLA,MICHAEL #EF1530 YOAKUM, ANDRE. #EF1126 SOUCY,JOSEPH $EF96001124 #TF0186 STREDWICK,PAUL #TF0225 ARNIM,DAVID #TF8069 BIDDLE, TODD $TF96000807 #EF1533 SPEIER, ANDREW [21600 SR 99 #BLK ,EDM] #EF0447 HERYLA,MICHAEL #EF1126 SOUCY,JOSEPH #EF1530 YOAKUM, ANDRE ,ALL UNITS STAGE IN PARKING AREA BEHIND E10 - E1 0 WILL MAINTAIN COMMAND [COMMAND] ,UNAVAILABLE TO RESPOND - UNMANNED ,WSP CRIME LAB ENROUTE [216 COMMAND] , 2 HAZMAT TECHS ON SCENE CONSULTING W/PD ONSCEN E REF SITUATION - ESTABLISHING HOT ZONE ,THIS IS HAZMAT SITUATION - TONE ALL EDM AND MLT VOLUNTEERS °/,REQ TONE OUT FOR HAZMAT 5 Type changed to T/HAZMAT #TF0225 ARNIM,DAVID #EF1530 YOAKUM, ANDRE � ",WILL HAVE DELAYED RESPONSE /2012 ENROUT HAZ5 /2013 MISC E10 `/202U ONSCNE HAZ5 /2026 MISC HAZ5 /2026 MISC HAZ5 /2031 (SC715 ) CHANGE /2034 (SC721 ) CHANGE /2036 CHANGE /2036 ASST U6 /2039 (SC715 ) MISC U6 /2041 NEWLOC U6 /2045 ASSTER TER3 /2049 ONSCNE U6 /2049 ONSCNE TER3 /2111 (SC721 ) CHANGE /2115 MISC E10 /2115 OK A10 /2116 MISC E10 /2126 MISC E10 /2127 OK A10 /2127 OK E9 /2127 OK E10 /2127 OK EDC /2127 OK HAZ5 /2127 OK TER3 /2127 OK U6 /2128 CHANGE /2136 CHANGE /2136 AOR E9 /2139 AOR EDC /2143 (SC715 ) AOR TER3 /2145 (SC721 ) AOR HAZ5 /2152 AOR U6 /2152 AOR E10 /2152 AOR A10 /2152 CLOSE A10 ,HAZ5 RESPOND CODE YEL ,05/02/96 20:25:56 TO SCT004 FROM SCT001: , HAZ 5 WANTS ESCA TO CALL HIM AT 999-0783 ,LYNN GROSS NOTIFIED/WILL BE CALLING IN ,REQ HAZTEAM RESPONSE ,DISPATCH U6 TO SCENE [216 COMMAND] #EF1533 SPEIER, ANDREW ,DELAYED RESPONSE--216 COMMAND ADV'D VIA PHONE [21600 SR 99 #BLK ,EDM] [216 COMMAND] #TF0052 READING,BRAD ,ENTRY TEAM IS MAKING ENTRY - CLEAR THE AIR ,4 BOTTLE GREEN TAP - THEY'RE FULL - ALSO HAVE A I MBER BOTTLE FULL WHICH IS AN EXPLOSIVE ,ENTRY TEAM ADVISING THEY HAVE CARBOLIC ACID AND AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE ,ENTRY AT THIS TIME IS COMPLETE | ,OPENING THE AIR NOW - ENTRY TEAM HAS COMPLETED THEIR OPERATIONS ,BREAKING DOWN COMMAND - E9 IN SERVICE - ALL UNI TS RETURNING TO TAC 1 | FIRWA010 EFD EF96-866 Agcy EFD Run # Snohomish County, Washington Page 1 Edmonds Fire Department 05/05/1996 FIELD INCIDENT REPORT | / DISPATCHED INCIDENT --------------------- EF96-866 Incident Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:38:36 � Location 21600 SR 99 #BLK, EDMONDS, WA 98020 City Map 455B County Map Census Fire Block EF157 Coord: X 1223293 Y 0478039 Jurisdictional Station STATION 10 Alarm Method TELEPHONE DIRECT TO FIRE DEPARTMENT Alarm Level 1 This incident is owned by R Purge Date Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:39:07 Enroute Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:39:00 Arrival Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:42:59 Clear Date 05/02/1996 Time 21:52:40 Response Time: Minutes 3 Sec 52 Incident Duration: Hours 2 Min 14 ALL INCIDENTS --------------- Exp # 0 Location 21600 SR 99#BLK, EDMONDS, WA 98020 City Map 455B County Map Census Fire Block EF157 Coord: X`1223293 Y 0478039 Shift B SHIFT Investigation Status INVESTIGATION NOT NECESSARY Situations Found: 1 HAZ MAT RELEASE INVESTIGATION NOTHING FOUND Actions Taken: 1 INVESTIGATE General Property Use MOTOR VEHICLE TRANSPORTATION USE Specific Property Use MOTOR VEH/BOAT SLS/SERV;INSUF INFO TO CLASS FURTHE Management PRIVATE TAX -PAYING PROPERTY Occupancy Type NO BUILDING INVOLVED. Structure Type 0 Structure Status STRUCTURE STATUS NOT APPLICABLE/UNDETERMINED Occupied at time of Inc STRUCTURE OR VEHICLE WAS OCCUPIED Number Responding: F.F. Career Engines Aerial EMS Rescue Others 17 F.F. Volunteer 1 2 ' Trucks Command 2 1 Tankers Hazmat 1 m.=k.. o"""~+i"" ppodd" / WPpv/8 mTrwuF/ Officer in Charge EF0447 / HERYLA, MICHAEL FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington EFD EF96-866 Edmonds Fire Department FIELD INCIDENT REPORT Weather Air Temperature Wildland Haz Severity Fire Service Casualties: Injuries Fatalities Non -Fire Service Casualties: Injuries Fatalities Aid Type AUTOMATIC AID RECV'D/ACCORD.W/AGREEMENT Aid Agency MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FIRE DEPT Multiagency Inc. No. Special Studies: 1 UNIT INFORMATION ------------------ Unit DIST FIRE - AID 10 Role FIRST IN UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 INVESTIGATE 2 Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:41:26 PERSONNEL ----------- Role DRIV DID EF0447 Name HERYLA, MICHAEL Condition Role CREW DID EF1126 Name SOUCY, JOSEPH �� Condition Role CREW DID EF1530 Name YOAKUM, ANDRE Condition EQUIPMENT ----------- Unit DIST FIRE - ENGINE 10 Role SUPPORT UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 2 Page 2 05/05/1996 Distance Travelled Disoatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:39:07 FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington Page 3 � EFD EF96-866 Edmonds Fire Department 05/05/1996 � � FIELD INCIDENT REPORT � PERSONNEL ----------- Role UNIT OFFICER DID EF0447 Name HERYLA, MICHAEL Condition Role DRIV DID EF1530 Name YOAKUM, ANDRE Condition Role CREW DID EF1126 Name SOUCY, JOSEPH P Condition EQUIPMENT ----------- Unit MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FIRE - ENGINE 9 � Role SUPPORT UNIT � Crew Action Taken: 1 INVESTIGATE � 2 � Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:39:07 PERSONNEL ----------- Role UNIT OFFICER DID TF0186 Name STREDWICK, PAUL Condition Role DRIV DID TF0225 Condition Role CREW DID TF8069 Condition Name ARNIM, DAVID Name BIDDLE, TODD EQUIPMENT ----------- Unit EDMONDS FIRE - UTILITY 6 Role SUPPORT UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 2 FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington Page 4 EFD EF96-866 Edmonds Fire Department 05/05/1996 FIELD INCIDENT REPORT Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:39:07 PERSONNEL ----------- Role UNIT OFFICER DID EF1533 Name SPEIER, ANDY Condition EQUIPMENT ----------- Unit EDC Role SUPPORT UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 2 Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 19:39:07 PERSONNEL ----------- EQUIPMENT ----------- Unit LYNNWOOD FIRE - HAZMAT 5 Role SUPPORT UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 NOTIFY OTHER AGENCIES/EMERG.AGENCIES ETC 2 INVESTIGATE Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 20:02:11 PERSONNEL -- - -- - - - - - - Role UNIT OFFICER DID TF0225 Name ARNIM, DAVID Condition Role CREW DID EF1530 Name YOAKUM, ANDRE Condition Role DRIVER DID LF0623 Name JOHNSTON, MICHAEL Condition FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington EFD EF96-866 Edmonds Fire Department FIELD INCIDENT REPORT EQUIPMENT ----------- Unit EDMONDS FIRE - UTILITY 6 Role SUPPORT UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 2 Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 PERSONNEL -- - - - - - - - - - Role UNIT OFFICER DID EF1533 Name SPEIER, ANDY Condition EQUIPMENT ----------- Unit MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FIRE - FIRE MARSHAL Role SUPPORT UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 INVESTIGATE 2 Time 20:36:23 Distance Travelled ` Dispatch Date 05/02/1996 Time 20:45:40 PERSONNEL ----------- Role UNIT OFFICER DID TF0052 Name READING, BRAD Condition EQUIPMENT ----------- SIGNATURES AND ACTIVITY ------------------------- Page 5 05/05/1996 Action INCIDENT UNLOCKED Date 05/03/1996 Emplo;ee: DID TF0186 mame STREDWICK, PAUL FIRWA010 EFD EF96-866 Rank Assignment Action INCIDENT CLOSED - Date 05/03/1996 Employee: DID Name Rank Assignment Snohomish County, Washington Edmonds Fire Department FIELD INCIDENT REPORT STATISTICS SENT EF0995 WESTFALL, JOHN J Action INCIDENT UNLOCKED Date 05/03/1996 Employee: DID EF0995 Name WESTFALL, JOHN J Rank Assignment Action INCIDENT CLOSED Date 05/03/1996 Employee: DID Name Rank Assignment - STATISTICS SENT Action INCIDENT CLOSED - Date 05/02/1996 Employee: DID Name Rank Assignment EF0995 05/03/1996 UTILITY 6 EF0995 WESTFALL, JOHN J STATISTICS SENT EF1126 SOUCY, JOSEPH P NARRATIVE --------- Page 6 05/05/1996 UTILITY 6 BECAME AVAILABLE FOR DISPATCH AT 2036 HRS FOR DISPATCH TO HAZTECH RESPONSE. FFS HART AND WESTFALL MOVED TO STA6 VIA COMMAND UNIT #461 TO MAN UTILITY RIG. U6 ARRIVED ON SCENE AT 2036 AND WAS ASSIGNED TO ESTABLISH LIGHTING FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ENTRY AND WASH AREAS. U6 REMOVED LIGHTING UPON COMMAND BREAKDOWN AND RETURNED TO STATION WITHOUT INCIDENT. EF0444 05/02/1996 E10 FIN E10 FIRST IN UNIT AT POSSIBLE HAZMAT INCIDENT (CHEMICALS FOR POSSIBLE DRUG LAB USE IN VEHICLE) AT REQUEST TO ASSIST POLICE.UPON ARRIVAL E10 ASSUME rOMMAND'DISPATCHED ITS HAZMAT TECH TO CONFER WITH EDMONDS POLICE.THE INCIDENT �� -�� WAS UPGRADED TO A HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCIDENT AND HAZMAT 5 WAS REQUESTED. UPON FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington EFD EF96-866 Edmonds Fire Department FIELD INCIDENT REPORT Page 7 05/05/1996 � THE ARRIVAL OF HAZMAT 5 THE INCIDENT WAS TRANSFER TO THAT UNIT E10 CONTINUE TO RETAIN COMMAND AND SUPPORT THE HAZMAT TEAM OPERATION.E10 PROVIDED WATER AND SET UP SUPPORT FOR DECONTANINATION,E9 WAS DIRECTED TO BECOME STAGEING,UTILITY 6 ASSISTED IN PROVIDEING LIGHTING.FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THIS INCIDENT MAY BE OBTAIN FROM REPORTS OF HAZMAT 5 AND EDMONDS POLICE DEPT. FOLLOWING THE EXIT FROM THE HOT ZONE BY THE ENTRY TEAM THE INCIDENT WAS TERMINATED AND ALL UNITS RETURNED TO QUARTERS. LF0623 05/02/1996 HAZ5 OBSERVATION ON ARRIVAL: HAZ-MAT 5 WAS ASKED TO PARK IN THE SOUTHEAST PARKING LOT OF 216 & HWY 99. 216 COMMAND HAD THE HOT ZONE ESTABLISH AROUND THE CAR WITH AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE. THEY HAD CALLED THE WSP, TO LET THEM KNOW WHAT THEY HAD. WSP WANTED US TO DO A RECON TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS NO OTHER HAZARD IN THE CAR. OPERATION: HAZ-MAT 5 DID A HAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT & FOUND THAT THIS SHOULD BE A LEVEL B ENTRY. SO WE CALLED FOR A FULL TEAM RESPONSE. F.F JOHNSTON TOOK THE TEAM LEADER ROLE, F.F. ARNIM WAS ASSIGNED RESOURCE, & F.F. YOAKUM STARTED ON GETTING THE DECON LINE READY. AS OTHER TEAM MEMBERS SHOWED UP WE THEY WERE ASSIGNED TO OTHER JOBS. THE ENTRY TEAM FOUND 4 BOTTLES OF AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE & A BOTTLE OF CARBOLIC ACID. WSP STATED THAT THE AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE WAS NO A PROBLEM AND COULD BE LEFT IN THE CAR FOR THE OWNER TO TAKE CAR OF. THE CAR WAS THEN TURN OVER TO EPD. OTHER INFO: ESCA WAS CALLED BY SNO-COM ON HAZ-MAT 5 REQUEST. THE ENTRY TEAM USED ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SENSODYE TUBES AND CAME UP WITH NEGATIVE READINGS TF0186 05/02/1996 ENGINE 9 E9 DISPATCHED TO A POSSIBLE MOBILE METH LAB. E9 CREW WAS BROKEN UP ON THE SCENE - FF ARNIM WENT TO ASSIST WITH THE HAZMAT EVALUATION, FF STREDWICK WAS STAGING OFFICER. NOTHING EVENTFUL TO REPORT. ALL FIRES STRUCTURE FIRE -------------- PERSON INFORMATION -------------------- FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington Page 8 EFD EF96-866 Edmonds Fire Department 05/05/1996 FIELD INCIDENT REPORT GENERAL EMS ------------- DETAILED EMS INFORMATION -------------------------- NON-FIRE SERVICE FIRE CASUALTY -------------------------------- FIRE SERVICE CASUALTY ----------------------- HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCIDENT ------------------------------ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DETAILS ----------------------------- MOBILE PROPERTY ----------------- SYSTEM CONTROLS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 18005 NE 69rH ST. SUITE A-1 10A REDMOND, WA. 98052 (206) 558-4722 fax (206)558-4325 December 19,1994 Sharon Nolan, permit coordinator City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, Wa. 98020 RE: 21600 Hwy 99 (Kruger Clinic) I st Floor tenant improvement 04re alarm) Dear Sharon; 6 -�t 711 "MITA 04-0"9 '0 1994 Find enclosed, drawings depwft the addition of 6 smoke detectors and re-knotion of 2 smoke de-tectors, on the Ist floor suite 150. The work is complete, and is approved by L&I electrical inspector. No other devices or equipment were added to the Gamewell fire alarm system. The current dmw is so small, and device quantity limited, that no pertinent changes to the battery calculations are needed. We would like to acceptance -test this project w/ fire prevention, as soon as possible. Please call me, if any additional information is reqWre& Battery Calculations: panel quiescent currard =. 130 A + 20 s.d. @.0002 A=.004 A * 24(hrs)= 3.22 AA alum current (panel) =.250 A + 6 s.d. in alarm @.002 A =.262 A + 1.5 A indicaft circuit = 1.762 A .082 =. 150 A 3.22 A 0.15 A 3.37 A.H. battery needed-, 5.0 A.H. battery supplied. Thank you, for your consideration in this matter. 4 1 : 1. : I 'D I il I 0 0 0 Data Gamewells Sheet 603 Low Profile Ionization Smoke Detector Features • Compatible with all Gamewell conventional systems • Dual -Chamber ionization design • Protected against transient interference • U.L. 268 listed Description The 70886 is a dual chamber ionization type smoke detector head assembly. It detects both smoldering and flaming fires. It fits a variety of detector bases permit- ting connection to 2 or 4 wire initiating loops. Sensitivity may be checked with a 70898 sensitivity monitor and detector operation may be checked with a mag- netic head 70899. The 70886 includes a built-in LED which blinks app * roximately once each second to inclicait 6 tii� head is powered. This LED also lights continuously when the detec- tor is in �1��m, latching on, and remaining lit until the detector is reset. Operation The 70886 Ionization Smoke Detector has two chambers: an outer sampling chamber and an inner balance chamber. Smoke or invisible combustion gases can freely penetrate the outer chamber, but the inner chamber is virtually closed to prevent easy entry. With both chambers ionized by a single radioactive source, a very small current flows. The presence of visible smoke or invisible gases have a great influence upon the current flow in the outer chamber, causing a change in the voltage ratio between the chambers. This difference isthen amplified insidethe detector and when it becomes great enough, causes the detector to go into alarm. Application The 70886 has responsive, yet high op- erational stabilitythat gives it an extremely wide range of uses. It is best suited for use in areas where early warning of trouble from super -heated or flaming combus- tibles is expected. The detector's design allows use in a wide range of humidities, temperaturesand airvelocities. The 70886 is also constructed to be effectively used where outside RF and other electrical interference is expected to be encoun- tered. The 70886 with its 70891 or 70892 low profilebase is electrically compatible with all Gamewell initiating zone modules. Current compatible detection devices with the 70886 utilizing the same base are the 70.884 photoelectric smoke detector and the 70887,.70888, 70889 or 70890 heat detectors. Only the smoke detectors have alarm LED's. Special latching bases can be used with heat detectors to provide the alarm LED indicator. Engineer's Specification The contractor shall furnish and install where indicated on the plans, dual - chamber, ionization smoke detectors Gamewell Model 70886. The combination detector head and twist -lock base shall be UL listed compatible with a UL listed fire alarm panel. The base shall permit direct interchange with Gamewell 70884 photoelectric de- tector and with Gamewell 70887, 70888, 70889 and 70890 heat detectors. The base shall limit the alarm current available to detectors to 20mA. The smoke detector shall have a flashing status LED for visual supervision. When the detector is actuated, the flashing LED will latch on steady and at full brilliance. The detector may be reset by actuating the control panel reset switch. The sensitivity of the detector shall be capable of being measured. The vandal -resistant, security locking feature shall be used in those areas as indicated on the drawings. The locking feature shall be field removable when not required. It shall be possible to perform a functional test of the detector without the need of generating smoke. The test method shall simulate effectsof productsof combustion in the chamber to ensure testing of all detector circuits. To facilitate installation, the detector shall be non -polarized. Voltage and RF tran- sient suppression techniques shall be employed to minimize false alarm poten- tial. Auxiliary SPDT relays shall be installed where indicated. Ordering Information Supplied Ouantity Part Number Description El 70886 Ionization Detector 0 70898 Sensitivity Monitor 0 70899 Test Magnet General Data Rated Voltage: 24VDC Working Voltage: 15 - 36.3 VDC Surge Current: 200�LA @ 24 VDC Normal Current: 40I.LA @ 24 VDC Alarm Current: .15 AMPS MAX. @ 24 VDC Radioactive Source: AM-241 0.5pCj Ambient Temperature +32'F - 120'F (OOC-490C) Humidity: 95% RH MAX. Mounting: 4" Octagonal Outlet Box* Color: Bone White *The Detector Base also mounts to 3-0 and 4-S boxes. is 0 Gamewelit 0 — - — -------- Ten Forge Park Data and design subject to changeJSupply subject to availability. GW Rev. 3/91 Printed in U.S.A. Franklin, Massachusetts 02038 (508) 520-1684 UL Listed -- - - - -- - — - -- - - -- - ---i S- " A/ % A-- L T'-'�'OVE Ill T-.6 C T-0 A IL AI& o �c ol 7t L E iTPA16� J* 'do e- y <Yoe- ft I pv p 15 1 , ov FAc 104, ;or --7'r ou Fr 1j. lo-q I gm CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE PREVENTION FILE MEMO/HAZARD FORM DATE /16 tqq REPORTED BY DO-Q c�, OF PAV6" MCIJ--r- & W. SU13JECT ADDRES& cz- CONCERNS/ -rt--/�-r q,�T _665,j 01-5k,-,�PT60 131 HAZARDS: SIGNED. %J FOLLOW-UP: �y NPA� -7 7, P,11, V,,jrr Ar&7- > 41 3 C, -, 04 (:5� rf 3 I-Z-116 1qj'J)AlUM ST404a4Y IN �Lle6:' IA.) -60a0-J& FP-OAA-' Cev,�;T�rTzo.,.) 0-,c- koc- Co---?,O�- - -T* -pvcrvl-,�- co-NIC 7*lj SIGNED.-t'A/,k (1, 8- Inspection Contract No. File No. WASHINGTON STATE FIRE MARSHAL INSURANCE BUILDING - OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504 FIRE ALARM SYSTER REPORT OF INSPECTION Date /Vp a,!& Name of Facility: 11-� OccuDied as: Address: ___Cit County: Zip-TSOP-0 Telep Building Designation (if more than one building)_ Inspection by:— 70"k) n —Title Date of Inspection: 1. Type of Test: Monthly Quarterly- Sen-d-annual Annual 2. Type of System: Noncoded Caamn coded Selective coded Dual coded (as pertaining to chapter 212-14 WAC) 3. Local Fire Department: 4. Fire Department Official contacted: 5. Test Received at Fire Department: Yes No 6. Master box Reset: A.M. P.M. 7. CanTents, explanation of unsatisfactory results, action taken, etc. LR E-e-ETTE-D FE"l-Eu EDMONDS RRE DEP-L. ORIGINAL TO BE RETURNED TO STATE FIRE MARSHAL 9QUIPYMT TESTED TV.Q OF EQUIPMENT, OBER OF UNITS TESTED TEST DATE SATISFACTORY CHECK TYPE AND WUFACTURER Yes No N/A 8. Control Panel Zzy 6-%JS!1-L A A 9-A4 <-' 9. Manual Station S- 4.3 10. Heat Detectors 11. Smoke Detectors /0 C&j E L 12. Audible Alarm Devices HooW A M., A 0 J-knPAN 1,1016 13. Visual Afarm Devices 14. Code Transmitters 15. Auto. Door Releases 16, Trouble Indicators_. 4A 17. Master Alarm Box 18. Batteries 6602 A S4 19. Charger 20. Generator 21. Ventilaton Control ---------- F 22, Fire Department Interconnection 23. Central Station Interconnection 24, Exterior Sprinkler Electric Alarm Bell 25. Sprinkler Water Flow Switch 26. Sprinkler Gate Valve Supervision Switch ILL-Inu=iat,r, 28. Automatic Time Delay of Generar Alarm Minutes. None Installed- 29. Test of alarm system on emergency power, satisfactory? Yes No_ ro 30. This is to certify that this fire alarm system has been p 'perly inspected for reliability covering the items listed in this report and is consistent with NFPA Fire Alarm Maintenance Standards. A. Signature of Ouner or Representative B. Signature of Fire Alarm Firm Representative C. Name of Firm Olympic Alarm Systems Inc. D. flailing Address P.O. BOX 11230 Winslow Wa. 98110 Phone no. 842-5453 E, Electrical Contractor's License # F. Specialty Electricians License I OLYMPAS19ONK CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL MAYOR CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0215 - FAX (206) 771-0208 FIRE DEPARTMENT 890 - 1 99 March 10, 1994 Doug Kirk Property Management NW 17371 NE 67th Ct.. Redmond, WA 98052 RE: Kruger Clinic 21600 Highway 99, Edmonds I Dear Doug: Thank you for participating in the Edmonds Fire Department lockbox program. Through your assistance, we may better,serve your fire protection needs. Quick and easy access expedites our performance where and when we are called. One f inal matter I would ask of you is the labeling of the maintenance closet in which the Fire Alarm panel is located. This item will assist our responding fire company in identifying and locating an alarm trip when Clinic personnel would not be available for escort. Thanks again for your assistance in keeping Edmonds fire -safe! S-ince 1 J'hn J Wes,fall rnspe tor 9 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan DATE CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE PREVENTION FILE MEMO/HAZARD FORM REPORTED BY OF 1pf�l SUBJECT ADDRESS: Z/600 H CONCERNS/ HAZARDS i5v4p6�J'Tc- 57-,fAA SIGNED FOLLOW-UP 6 17,5-- 1 S6 F:�W, Dk_ 44D 777q-26zfG, rl Ll 7_ _vv) � �C�6" I 6,-+V ( 0 t-. '54' C u,60 A OLL 1—a0t_�OX. 3 -7 ( A(C- Co TrL . CT I??) C) 6vo 1 ri i-o cr-6o-�_ ' I tj 3/1 17� �,-V'd A/DTCL5 SIGNED CITY - OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL MAYOR CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0215 FAX (206) 771-0208 FIRE DEPARTMENT 8 go - 194 August 25, 1993 Dr. David Heard and Associates; Kruger Clinic 21600 Highway 99 #250 Edmonds, WA 98026 PA . ft6v--o Dear Ns0@FFrW: Enclosed you'll find,a brochure for Supra Keyboxes. The Edmonds Fire Department utilizes a security "lock box" system which provides Fire Department access during an emergency while maintaining the utmost security for your keys. The.Lock Box may be secured outside a variety'of locations. Fire department accessible spaces may include; main entry, alarm room/panels, automatic sprinkler/ standpipe riser rooms and electrical or mechanical rooms, depending upon your business and the building. The secured access items may include keys, written combinations for locks and electronic keypads or manual buttons and switches for elect ' rically-activated access. This is a strictly voluntary program. Any company who desires may request an authorization letter from the Edmonds Fire Department. The company must then contact: Tri-City Locksmiths, Inc. 22908 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA 98026 (206) 771-2445 Tri-City Locksmiths provide "lock boxes" at essentially their cost. Each box costs -you $42.10. A completed copy of the authorization letter must then be returned to: Edmonds Fire Department 250 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 (206) 771-0215, #390 Once installed, fire crews will be able to access those spaces concerned to quickly mitigate the emergency at hand. Should you have any questions, or desire to participate, please contact the Fire Prevention Office at 771-0215, #301. Our hours a are 8:00-5:00, nday through Friday. Stay fire -safe! Si c re j n J estfa 1 e -Incorporated August 11, 1890 9 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan /\ 0 wr I EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCK BOX AUTHORIZATION LETTER This is to authorize Doug Kirk Property 14gmt NW for the: Cagent) Kruger C1 inic alt 21600 Highway 99 .(Building Name) (Building Address) to purchase a Lock Box for Fire Department use for emergency access. 1. Assigned key # 2. Location of Supra Box Give a brief description of where the Lock Box will be mounted in relation to the main entrance. The Fire Depart- ment recommends that the box be located just to the right of the main.door, if possible. 3. Key(s) identification/access to: Identify each key with a brief description of what the key will unlock. Keep a minimal number of keys in the box. The Fire Department should have easy access to: Main Entrance Electrical Room Mechanical Room Sprinkler Room Alarm Panel Fiie oTpartment Author-1zed Signature NOTE: A copy of this authorization, noting the assigned key number, must be returned to the Edmonds Fire Department. 08/05/93 t-. U�l ............... ... Atoms i - + 8 13 -'-"Li T IC, T 01 TELEPHONE FACSIMILE COMMUNICATION 'GROUP RECEIVED Proiect Name: I Project No.: 12,,P 7— — 97-1 TO: /7--r- orm 4�F ctq FAX NUMBER: /- -7-74/- ATTENTION: FROM: ENT. DATE S 0& 14(q / —TIME SENT_ RE. -:57Z-4/Qp,/t-3M PAGES SENT INCLUDING C&dR SH =-: COMMENTS: I wjis 00 sill!! !�:111IL-E31ii!i1il Ill- q NMI v WT. CM V *4foL) ft)rZ %lrC)U SIGNED: _cc: V. A. 60-LWOS - 1 R4!�m - MAIL COPY TO: W""4Addressee =11%( Ora S6 )Q10 s Jull 10 I-J-JI EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. I ,va"ID&MOW Dg4 TD A6651-67- 1*2. it 4f"4545" *3 7 10SOIS2NDAVENUENIE kEDMOND.WASHINGMN MS2 FAX NO. 12061"9-1592 ARLAN L COLUNS KEITH A. MULL MARK L- WOERMAN CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 775-2525 MAYOR FIRE DEPARTMENT , 890 - 199 - June 10, 1991 Mr. Vaughn D. Bray CNA Architecture Group 3050-152nd Avenue N. E. Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Mr. Bray, SUBJECT: KRUGER CLINIC ADDITION - 21600 HIGHWAY 99, EDMONDS This letter will amend my previous letter of June 4, 1991. 1 was mistakenly under the impression that the new addition was separated by an area separation wall which would have kept the new section separate, thereby not requiring the Class 2 standpipe. Per our conversation today, I stand cor- rected and reinstate the requirement for a standpipe system. However, I still recommended that the standpipe system design be upgraded to a Class 3. A Class 2 system is limited in use and is intended for in-house fire brigade use. While a Class 3 system is designed for use by Fire Department personnel. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 775-2525, #233. GLM: be Sincerely, Gary L. McComas Acting Fire Chief 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 9 Sister Cities International — Hpkinan. lanan 0 CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 71-5-2525 MAYOR FIRE DEPARTMENT 90 -19 June 4, 1991 Mr. Vaughn D. Bray CNA Architecture Group 3050-152nd Avenue N. E. Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Mr. Bray, SUBJECT: KRUGER CLINIC ADDITION - 21600 HIGHWAY 99, EDMONDS I am in the process of reviewing a set of plans to in- stall a Class II standpipe system in this addition. It is the city's determination that a standpipe system is not required for this pro'ject. However, if it is your desire to proceed with the design, I recommend that a Class III system should be installed. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 775-2525, #233. Sincerely, Gary,(3-. McComas Fire Marshal GLM: be cc: Mike Smith, Bronze Mech, Inc. 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 e Sister Cities International — Hekinan. Janan CNA ARCHITECTURE GROUP RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: DATE: MME: CALL (TO±::�(FRq�� NAME: REGARDING: .00l Aa N) q I FIRE DERL a, SIGNED: cc: Uvloa5p-4 i 1990AJ Z4:-:;- 1045r� - - The foregoing notes are based upon the above signed CNA representative's interpretation of discussions or decisions that transpired during the documented telephone conversation. Anyone wishing to amend these notes are requested to do so in written form, delivered to CNA Architecture Group, not later than one week from receipt: otherwise, these notes shall stand as written. I*A U V I --i tjU I C. - I I I it I-HUIZ.UWC- REPLY To QtL C 0 H P 0 R A T 1 0 N 0 F A M E A I C A POST OFFICE BOX 1163 7018 SOUTH 220TH STREET KENT. WASHINGTON WMS-1 163 KENT; (2DG) 872-9570 SEATTLE: 623-4760 November 19, 1990 Edmonds Fire Dept. 250 5th Ave. N Edmonds, Wa. 98020 ATTN: Gary McComas REF; Request for Flow Test Dear Gary, Per our telephone conversation today, I would like the results of a flow test conducted at 21600 Highway 99, Edmonds, Wa. This information is for the expansion at-tbe-Kruger Medical Clinic. Due to a short bid schedule if you could fax me the results I would be greatly appreciated at 872-9574. if you should have any questions please call. Thank you for your cooperation. ---4� Sincerely, "AUTOMATIC" SPRINKLER CORPORATION A FIGGIE INTERNA-T\IO AL COMPANY Bard Bettencourt Service Sales Representative BB/slt F XS C\ 0 /,y A "AuTOMATIC" SPRINKLER coRPORATION OF AMERICA, A FIGGIE INTERNATIONAL COMPANY12 890 . 1 94 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works * Planning * Parks and Recreation * Engineering LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: ow'ey A&Mis SUBJECT: TRANSMITTING: FOR YOUR INFORMATION: AS YOU REQUESTED: . tl� REVIEW AND COMMENT: FOR STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK: FOR NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK: FOR CORRECTION AND RESUBMITTAL: RESPOND TO LETTER IN WRITING: RESUBMIT 2 REVISED DRAWINGS: SEND COMMENTS DIRECTLY TO. BUILDING DIVISION: COMMENTS: BUILDING DIVISION CITY OFFICIAL LARRY S. NALIGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR JR EC E IV ED NOV 15 1990 'FEDMONDS FIRE DEP_T�, 9 Incorporated August 11, 1890 * Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan - A. November 13,1990 Mr. Dick Mumma, Building Official City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: lCB0 Plan Review Comment Letters Kruger Clinic Plan Check No. 201 Dear Mr. Mumma: -GROUP CNA Architecture Group is providing your office with two sets of corrected Plans and Project Manuals for you review and comment. The corrected Plans and Project Manuals are a result of ICBO correspondence of October 5, 1990 nonstructural review comments, and of October 10, 1990 mechanical and structural review comments. I will address each of these letters separately. Also, attached is additional correspondence to CNA from the consulting engineers describing their corrective actions relative to the aforementioned ICBO correspondence, of which I will refer to. October 5, 1990 Nonstructural review comments. 1 . No architectural or consultant response is necessary. 2. The waste line location was revised, see drawing 1/C1.1, Civil Site Plan. See Mechanical engineers response letter. 3. The parking lot grades have been coordinated between sheets L1.1 and C1.1. Drawing L1.1 revised to reflect the grades shown on drawing C 1. 1, and a notation of "See Civil Site Plan for final site grading.". 4. The design of the new addition and site improvements utilized the State of Washington Barrier Free Accessibility Code, WAC 51 -10. The mechanical engineer submitted to the City of Edmonds the necessary documentation describing Energy Code compliance.See Electrical Engineers response letter. See Electrical Engineers response letter. 280LT010.00C Barrier Free Accessibility Checklist as attached to the October 5, 1990. a. The Barrier free parking space requirement has been met by providing six (6) barrier free parking stalls. Each stall is eight feet six inches (8'-6") wide with an adjacent four foot (4'-0") wide aisle as per WAC 51-10, 7503(c). The barrier free parking spaces, per WAC 51-10, 7503(a), of two percent (2%) of the parking spaces-hass . Swce 600 3050 152ND AVENUE N/E REDMOND. WASHINGTON 98052 TELEPHONE 120618132-6060 FAX 1\10� i206) 869-1592 ARLAN E. COLLINS KEITH A. NULL MARK L. WOERMAN AIA P RI�NCIP;-L —rCir4.IT[1:7- Kruger Clinic Project No.: 280 - 2.9.1 November 13, 1990 Page 2 been met. The plan provides the requirement of two percent of (2) of two hundred sixteen (216) parking space provided yields five (5) parking spaces, and six (6) parking spaces have been provide. Refer to drawing 6/A1.1, Site Plan. 1.b. The parking layout was revised relocating the stalls in question to the west entrance, and eliminating the necessity of crossing traffic. Refer to drawing 6/A1.1, Site Plan. 1.j. Signs displaying the International Symbol of Access have been placed at the south entrance and the west entrance of the building. Also, signage is provided at each parking space. Refer to drawing 6/A1.1, Site Plan. 2.f. The interior wall and cabinetry elevation of Toilet, 2001, drawing 17/AS.6, was revised to note the guarding of the plumbing lines. 3.b. No architectural or consultant response is necessary. 3.g. The building is a medical office building. The primary routes throughout the facility are handicapped accessible, All patients and visitors are escorted to and from the exam rooms within each suite. Any patient needing assistance within the exam room will receive it from their escort. The doors to each of these exam rooms has a reverse swing to provide visual privacy for a patient in the exam room. since each patient is escorted into and from the exam room, we are requesting that the one foot six inch (V-6"), and one foot (1'-0") clearance required on the latch side of the door be waived. 3.h. Mens'Toilet, 1002, and Womens' Toilet, 1003, are not barrier -free. Barrier -free toilets are provided in the building. Toilet, 2001, is a unisex barrier -free toilet. These toilets are accessible via elevator from the First Floor. 3.1. Signage is noted to be provided adjacent to stairs, elevator, toilet rooms, and other spaces. See Room Finish and Accessories Schedule, drawing 1/A2.7, and Room Finish and Accessories Schedule Remarks, drawing 21A2.7, items 13 and 14. 4.k. A handrail installed on the ramp from the new entry court, located on the south side of the building, to the existing building is provided with a handrail. Refer to drawing 2/A1.1, Site Plan. A detail drawing is added to the documents clarifying the construction of handrail. Refer to drawing 1 1/A8.2. 4.k. A handrail installed on the retaining wall near the south entry court, located on the south side of the building, is provided with a handrail. Refer to drawing 6/A1.1, Site Plan. A detail drawing is added to the documents clarifying the construction of handrail. Refer to drawing 12/A8.2. 28OLT01O.DOC Kruger Clinic Project No.: 280 - 2.9.1 November 13,1990 Page 3 4.1. Signs displaying the International Symbol of Access have been placed W the new main entrance and the west entrance of the building. Refer to drawing 6/A1.1, Site Plan. A barrier free access symbol will be located adjacent to the appropriate toilet facilities, see Drawing 1/A2.7, Room Finish and Accessories Schedule, Remark number seven (7). 4.a. No architectural or consultant response is necessary. 4.f. Doors, with glazing, installed in openings in the Accessible Route of Travel are noted with the glazing at three feet four inches (3'-40) above the bottom. a review of the schedule indicates that door type OV" is not used on the project. Refer to drawing 1/A2.8, Door Opening Types. 1986 Washington Energy Code Regulations, Commercial Plan Check as attached to the October 5, 1990 letter. 1.c. The roof insulation system at the low slope roof was revised from an insulation installed between structural wood joists to an installation installed above the plywood roof deck, consequently, the spaces between the structure is not vented. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 3. Appropriate window assemblies, an air infiltration barrier, appropriate door hardware, and sealants are used to minimize air infiltration. See Wall Section, drawing 1/A3.3, and the various door and window details drawings 3, 4, 7, and 8/ A8.1. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 4.a. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 4.1. See Mechanical Engineers response lefter. 5.c See Electrical Engineers response letter. 5.e See Electrical Engineers response letter. 5.f See Electrical Engineers response letter. 5. The Project Manual was revised specifically Section 02371 Drilled Concrete Piers, paragraph 1.02.A to read "Section 01410 - Testing Laboratory Services", and paragraph 1.05.13.2 to read "Testing Laboratory Service, 01410". Again, the Project Manual was revised Section 01410, Testing Laboratory Services, paragraph 1.10.13 to read "Section 02371 - Drilled Concrete Piers". 6. The Project Manual, Section 02200, Earthwork in paragraph 1.02.A Related Sections, notes the coordination with Section 01410, Testing Laboratory Services. Again the Project Manual, Section 01410, Testing Laboratory Services in paragraph 1.03.A Related Sections notes the coordination 28OLT01O.DOC Kruger Clinic Project No.: 280 - 2.9.1 November 13, 1990 Page 4 with Section 02200, Earthwork. The addition of a note on the plans would be duplication information. 7. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 8. Site Plan, drawing 7/A1.1 has a graphic indication and the notation "46-04, minimum yard separation" shown at the north east and south sides of the buildings. 9. See attached correspondence from Kauffmans's Pharmacy, the tenant of Suite 1 F, dated October 8, 1990, indicating that the quantities of materials on site are minimal 10. A centralized manifolded medical gas system is not provided in the new addition, consequently, a room for this is not needed. ii. The finishes of the Toilet rooms was revised. Toilet room finishes are (1) ceramic file floor with a ceramic tile wainscot on appropriate wall, or (2) resilient sheet vinyl floor with plastic laminate wainscot on appropriate walls. See Room Finish And Accessories Schedule, Drawing 1/A2.7. 12. The Project Manual, Section 01060, Regulatory Requirements paragraph 1.01.D requires the contractor to have on -site the Uniform Building Code, Gypsum Association Manual, and the Underwriter's Laboratory manuals. 13. The CNA Architecture Group relied upon information furnished by the Client to determine the existing buildings type of construction. This information consisted of drawings prepared by Salmon Bay Design Group, Seattle, Washington, dated March 19, 1985, which states the building is constructed to meet the requirements of Type V - One hour fire -resistive construction. An on - site investigation of the existing buildings construction was not done. 14. The construction of the vertical shafts for heating, ventilating and air-conditioning duct work was clarified in drawings 23/A8.2 24/A8.2, 25/A8.2, and 26/A8.2. 15. The roof insulation system at the low slope roof was revised from an insulation installed between structural wood joists to an installation installed above the plywood roof deck. See Wall Section, drawing 1/A3.3, and the Project Manual, Section 07510, Built-up Bituminous Roofing. The new system places insulation and vapor barrier above the structure. The "Roof Vents, 1.0 square feet" have been removed from the low -slope roof. 16. The aftic ventilation of the existing building in the area of new roof connection was increased by the addition of louvers. See Roof Plan, drawing 2/A2.8, notation which reads "Louvers with screen." in the existing mansard. 17. The method of insulating the low -slope roof was revised, see item 15 response. Also, see Structural Engineers response letter. is. The access to the attic, created by the roof trusses, was provided by a door adjacent to the roof 28OLT01O.DOC Kruger Clinic Project No.: 280 - 2.9.1 November 13, 1990 Page 5 access hatch installed in the vertical chord endwall of the wood truss. However, attic access in now accomplished via a fire -rated access panel in Suite 2R, room 'RN, 2R1 2'. SeeSecondFloor Plan, drawing 4/A2.3. 19. The Wall Section drawings 2VA3.3, and 3/A3.3 include the notation "2X fire stop, typical all wall, at 8'-0" above finished floor', and the graphic symbol. 20. The acoustic suspension system detailing was revised, see drawing 3/A6.1. 21. The existing first story corridor is a pre-existing condition relative to the new addition. No architectural or consultant response is necessary. 22. The means of egress from Suite 1 A is through the new building addition, The means of egress from Suite 1 B is directly to the exterior. The occupant load of Suites 1 A, and 1 B combined is twenty-six (26) occupants, and Table 33-A will allow a single means of egress when the occupant load does not exceed 30. The storage room and mechanical equipment rooms means of egress is via the stairs to the first floor, with a combined occupant load of twenty-three (23) occupants. 23. The Pharmacy, Suite 1 F, is separated from Corridor, room 1000, and Entry, room 1004, by two overhead coiling doors, 1 -hour fire -resistive rated, numbers I F01 A', and I F01 13'. RefertoFirst Floor Plan, drawing 4/A2.2, and Door Schedule, drawing 1/A2.8. 24. The door from the existing doctor's suite, Suite 1 A, was mislabeled, and was corrected from 1004B to 1 A01. See First Floor Plan, drawing 4/A2.2. The new interior windows between the existing doctor's suite, Suite 1A, and Entry, 1004, are window types W and V, as shown in Window Schedule, drawing 1/A3.1, with the notation "h.m. (hollow metal) frame with wire glass". 25. The Door Schedule, drawing 1/A2.8, was corrected noting glazing in doors as wire glass. 26. No architectural or consultant response necessary. 27. The hallway system for Suite 2R, comprising of Halls 2RO4, 2R22, and 2R27, is enclosed by one - hour, fire -rated walls extending from the floor to the structure above, as detailed by drawing I 5/A2.1, Similar'. The suspended acoustic tile ceiling is non -rated. The mechanical HVAC duct work opening into this space is protected by fire dampers, see Second Floor Plan - Air Condition & Heating, sheet M-5. The corridor is designed with acceptable dead ends less than twenty feet (20'-0% per UBC 3305(e). Letter of October 10, 1990 Mechanical and Structural comments Mechanical Comments: 1 . Construction details (1) of the HVAC shaft and roof penetration (2) of the HVAC shaft and floor 280LT010.00C Kruger Clinic Project No.: 280 - 2.9.1 November 13,1990 Page 6 penetration, condition 1, and (3) of the HVAC shaft and floor penetration, condition 2, were added to the Documents. See drawings 4IA2.3, Second Floor Plan and drawing 2/A2.6, Roof Plan for references to drawings 23tA8.2, 24JA8.2, 25/A8.2, and 26/A8.2. See also the Mechanical Engineers response letter. 2. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 3. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 4. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 5. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 6. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 7. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 8. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 9. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 10. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. 11. See Mechanical Engineers response letter. Structural Comments: 1 . See Structural Engineers response letter. 2. See Structural Engineers response letter. 3. See Structural Engineers response letter. 4. See Structural Engineers response letter. 5. See Structural Engineers response letter. 6. See Structural Engineers response letter. 7. See Structural Engineers response letter. 8. See Structural Engineers response letter. 9. See Structural Engineers response letter. 28OLT010.00C Kruger Clinic Project No.: 280 - 2.9.1 November 13,1990 Page 7 10. See Structural Engineers response letter. 11. See Structural Engineers response letter. 12. See Structural Engineers response letter. 13. See Structural Engineers response letter. 14. See Structural Engineers response letter. 15. See Structural Engineers response letter. 16. See Structural Engineers response letter. 17. See Structural Engineers response letter. 18. See Structural Engineers response letter. 19. See Structural Engineers response letter. 20. See Structural Engineers response letter. 21. See Structural Engineers response letter. Letter of September 21, 1990 City of Edmonds Engineering comments. Storm System,(Sheet C1.2) 1 . See Civil Engineers response letter. 2. See Civil Engineers response letter. 3. See Civil Engineers response letter. Parking Lot (Sheet C1.2) 1 . See Civil Engineers response letter. 2. See Civil Engineers response letter. Parking Lot (Sheet Al. 1) 28OLT01O.DOC Kruger Clinic Project No.: 280 - 2.9.1 November 13,1990 Page 8 Parking Lot (Sheet Al. 1) Concrete wheelstops are shown adjacent to the concrete walk near the building. The note nWheelstop, concrete, 7'-ON extruded, secure to paving with #6 rebar, 2'-0N long each end" is added. Refer to drawing 6/Al.1, Site Plan. Inter -office Correspondence of November 2,1990 City of Edmonds Fire Marshal comments. 1 . See October 5, 1990, item 10 response. 2. Each suite and the public spaces of the addition is provided with portable fire extinguishers. See plans. 3. No architectural or consultant response is necessary. If you have questions in regard to the above responses please call. If you have need of additional documents to complete your review please cafl. Sincerely, , 4 &5e� Vaughn ln4 y Attachments: Plans and Project Manuals. City of Edmonds plan review letters. Addendum One (1), plans incorporated into sets. Jeff Kauffman, Kauffman Pharmacy letter. Bouillion, Christofferson & Schairer, Inc. letter. MBF, Inc. letter. Sparling and Associates letter. CC: Robert Chaffee, M.D. Client Representative Jerry Rehn, Rehn + Skorheim Arlan Collins, CNA Architecture Group Keith Null, CNA Architecture Group Don Kerzie, Bouillion, Christofferson & Schairer, Inc. Dean Froerer, MBF, Inc. Ted, Smith, Smith & Huston Ed Stephen, Sparling and Associates 280LT010.00C CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works * Planning * Parks and Recreation * Engineering , 8 9 0 . 194 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: SUBJECT: TRANSMITTING: FOR YOUR INFORMATION: AS YOU REQUESTED: eUAA1-,vr37,-41_U.S REVIEW AND COMMENT: FOR STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK: LARRY S. NALIGHTEN MAYOR __,,-PE1Ef1jE, HAHN : .;Nl DIRECTOR 6��H COMMENTS: 1w I/A ,0,pyy ,ehejtl 4 4t- vlwd ,7 Y2h ffi e;17 FOR NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK:— 14�yz_e FOR CORRECTION AND RESUBMITTAL:_ V' /_ 1"'new RESPOND TO LETTER IN WRITING: V*" F y RESUBMIT 2 REVISED DRAWINGS: SEND COMMENTS DIRECTLY TO AiwrI416 BUILDING DIVISION: "Ocd VA aw-'s TI—TYOFFICIAL Incorporated August 11. 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan. Japan ;0-7- �ft S BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN BRENTSNYDEFLC-S-O- BUILDING OFFICIAL PACIFICA. CALIFORNIA FIRST VICE-CHAIRMAN EUGENE J. ZEIJ.ER, P.F— CJLO. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA SECONOVICE-CHAIRMAN JAMES L MANSON. C.S.O. DIRECTOR. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY COUNTYOFSPDXANE SPOKANE. WASHINGTON IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN WML" I— SCHLECHT. CILO. BUILDING OFFICIAL COUNTY OF WASHINGTON HILLSBORO. OREGON ROBERT J. EPPSTEIN. cz.o. CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FREMONT, CAILIFORNIA International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112TH AVENUE, N.E.. SUITE 13- MO 0 809 FOWLER, P.E� AtA. C.S.O. DIRECTOR 01: BUILDING INSPECTION kalLENE. TEXAS JAN P ' GASTERLAND. C.S.O. BUILDING CODE OFFICER ST. PAUL MINNESOTA PNjLLJP m. HERRINGTON. C.S.O. DIRECTOR. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY 9EN0. NEVADA DOUGLAS E. HOOD. C-8-0- BUILDING OFFICIAL COLORAOC RIVER INDIAN TRIBES PARKER, ARIZONA GORDON W. MURDOCH, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL DANA POINT. CALIFORNIA MICHAEL J. NOLTE, C.S.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL CRESWELL. OREGON RON PERKEREWICZ. C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTYOFKITSAP PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON JAMES R. SINGLETON. C.B.O. BUILDING SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR TUCSON. ARIZONA THOMAS R. THOMPSON. C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL BROOMFIELD. COLORADO ROBERTO. WESER. P.E.. C.B.O. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING COUNTY OF CLARK LAS VEGAS. NEVADA ALLEN 0. ZEPPER, C-8-0- BUILDING OFFICIAL STILLWATER. MINNESOTA PRESIDENT JAMES E. BIMR. P.E. FAX NUMBERS Order Oeparl"*M (213) 692-3853 Plan Review (2131692-3425 C80 ES (213) 695-4894 AdnUneStr3t10n (213)699-8031 0 "'. Av X October 5, 199(00 1-0 BLLLEV�E. WASHINGTON 9111004 - (200) 451-9.541 OFFICESOF JERRYJ. BARSIUM P-L REGIONAL MANAGER FRANK S. MATSUMARA, P.F— &L SENIOR REG110141AL ENGINEER CHARUE54WILLIAMS PZ REGIONAL ENGINEER AMC.DICHAUSMP.L REGIONAL ENGINEER RUEN-WEN MARK CHANCL PZ REGIIONAL ENGINEER Plan Check: 2931 Project: Kruger Clinic Remodel/Addn. Address: 21600 Highway 99 Code Information: B2 Occupancy; Type V-1 Hour Construction Stories: 2 - Floor ARea: 21000 Ne 45qOO Total) Occupant Loa —3 0 New Valuation: $1,080,700 1988 Uniform Building Code ---------- Exposure: B 7 Seismic Zone: 3 Basic Wind Speed:80 mph Dick Mumma OT Building Official 250 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Mumma: QD 0 We have reviewed the plans and associated data for the project mentioned above to see if it conforms to the Uniform Building. Code as well as parts of the Uniform Mechanical Code. We have not reviewed them for requirements of federal, or other state and local regulatory agencies. In most cases, the designer should modify the plans and/or specifications to satisfy these comments. I NONSTRUCTURAL 1. You should coordinate all city approvals, especially for the increased flow into the sewer line as well as possible "industrial waste". 2. Note that sheet M-2 shows the waste line exiting near line. D and then refers you to the civil drawings. Sheet C-1.2 seems to show it going into a catch basin which, of course, wouldn't be correct. A redesign seems necessary. 3. The parking lot grades so not appear to agree between sheets C1.2 and 1-1.1- Main Office: 5360 South Workman Mill Road e Whittier, California 90601 - (213) 699-0541 Plan Check 2931 Dick Mumma, Edmonds October 5, 1990 Page Two 4. These plans should comply with the state requirements for. energy and the handicapped. Although we do not publish or maintain these codes we are providing guide sheets which explain the requirements. 5. Soils report #W-6896 by Rittenhouse- Zeman and Associates and dated June 14, 1990 complies with most of the requirements of section 2905. However, additional test or calculatiori data is required to justify the pile criteria. Section 2908(a) . Also, the method of verifying its capacity in the field should be given in an addendum. 6. Special inspection should be provided for the soil work. Section 306 (a) . This should be noted on the plans. 7. However, the architect, engineer, or soils engineer should discuss what happens with the utility lines coming into this relatively rigid building if the lines outside of the outline will sink. Also, how will this addition react relative to the existing building? 8. Three 451 wide yards are required to be kept clear -of buildings on the north, south and east sides of the entire building. Section 506 (a) 2. You should keep this information in your permanent files for future reference. Section 504(a). 9. The materials used or stored in the pharmacy should be described so that we can ensure it isn't a H-7 occupancy. Section 901 (a). 10. 1 would imagine that medical gases are used in this building. If so, the room then are in should be separated from the rest of the building by a one hour occupancy separation and should have the exterior door and ventilation requirements of section 702(b) provided. 11. All the toilet rooms should have a wall finish around the water closets which is equivalent to ceramic tile (paint on drywall is not). Section 510 (a) . You should also decide if sheet vinyl is equivalent to ceramic tile on the floors. 12. There are many references to ICBO evaluation reports or Drywall Association design numbers for fire resistance of the structural elements. This is good as far as it goes but the exact details of how double layers of drywall are to be attached and joints staggered, for instance, should be shown --all details should be on the plans --they could attach the report details to the plans if they want. 13. You should verify that the existing building was constructed to one hour construction also. 14. The construction of the vent shaft in waiting 2RO2 should be shown including the base --the mechanical plans sheet M-3 show a duct entering the side of it so the base must be below the floor system. Also, it should extend to the roof sheathing. Section 1706 (a) . Plan Check 2931 Dick Mumma, Edmonds October 5, 1990 Page Three is. The roof vents should be justified for a net 1 sf such as shown on Sheet A2.6--a cut sheet and/or test results should be given. Section 32059a) 16. How are the attic ventilation louvers in the existing building replaced when the new addition blocks them? 17. However, the structural plans will require a positive connection between the roof diaphragm and the wall plate. Therefore, the partial height blocking as shown in Section 1/A3.3 and others would not work. How will ventilation be provided through structural diaphragm blocking? 18. Attic access should be provided on the second floor. Section 3205(e). Assuming it will pierce the fire rated ceiling, a 1 hour access door is required. Section 4304(b)6 and 4305(c) 19. Fire blocking should be provided at the floor line in Detail VA3.3 at both the floor line and also at the existing roof line. Section 2516(f)2. Also, a vertical fire- block should be provided at the -furred wall shown in Section9/A2.1 at every 10' measured in a horizontal line. I f the insulation fills the space, then this will be satisfied. 20. Detail VA6.1 should be more specific as to location of the first braces. How often they are spaced, separation from two walls, exact size of the vertical brace, etc. 21. 1 am not sure how the existing first story corridor was justified as it appears to be a dead-end to me. Section 3304(d) 22. Also, I am not sure how two exits are provided out of the existing first story. Section 3303(a,c) 23. The pharmacy has to be separated from the corridor and entry by corridor construction protection. Section 3305(g,h) 24. The doors 1004 to the existing director's office are shown as unprotected glass on Sheet A2.3. At least 20 minute smoke doors are required. Likewise, the windows from the offices have to be protected. 25. Safety glazing is shown in some smoke doors unless this is allowed by the listing, wired glass should be used. 26. The existing corridor on the second floor should be protected to Section 3305 standards. 27. The hallway system 21104, 2R22, and 21127 serves more than 30 people and should be designed for one hour construction without dead ends. Alk Plan Check 2931 Dick Mumma, Edmonds October 5, 1990 Page Four The mechanical and structural comments will be sent out Monday. Our headquaters accounting department in Whittier, California will send you an invoice for this plan reviewing service based on a valuation of $1,080,700. I am retaining all data and plans in b6ticipation of telephone calls from the designer and also that I will be doing the recheck. I am taking the liberty of sending a copy of this plan checking list directly to him. Please instruct him to indicate on a separate sheet on which sheet or detail the corrections may be found. Please feel free to contact us if there are any questions. r truly rs, Y " r Jerryy ,d-Bayr . be�rsa, P. E. Regional Engineer ljh Enclosures c/CNA Architects (faxed 1015/90) WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS FOR BARR REE DESIGN (Please do circled item Code sections cited refer to the amendments in WACSI-10 dated 2-TS-85.1 1. Site accessibility- -A., :�, flew A*c alloo 12*-6" wide HC parking spaces should be provided. Section 7503(a.c). spaces p�re required..9�I`Y H�4C.*l 4E - tYVIW fAe�e_r Handicap parking spaces should be located so that the accessible routes of travel from it do not enter the parking lot or driveway. A revi i is required and curo cuts acid slide elks d* t to the 7aces should 4 Vtb "o be h n. Sectign 7503(b) /,;a ZI atu oz, 01�&rZu 7"f CZ-;f C4 tY4 2- o , 0 C� E av a o— soultl� r .14 eddy, 'e Z A c. The sidewalks shot Id b widen ack at the curb �uts so the ra s are not between parking spaces. do not obstruct the sidewalk and have r1anding at top. Section 7SO2(e.;). d. An accessible route of travel should be provided between the accessible buildings on the site and from the public sidewalks to the buildings. Section 402, definition of ACCESSIBLE SITE. e. A maximum slope of 21 should be shown in the HC spaces and among the accessible routes of travel from the HC parking and public sidewalks to the primary entrance(s) to the buildings. Section 7SO2(e). 7503(d). f. Slopes steeper than 2% should be considered as ramps and should be provided with complying landings top and bottom. If ramp slopes exceed 1:20, handrails should be provided. Section 7502(e.k). 9. The side slopes of the ramp appear to exceed a 1:6 ratio and should be modified. h. Walks and ramps should be of firm, stable, smooth-materiai with a nonslip surface and at least 44" wide. Section 7502(d,i). i. Each HC space should be shown as having a ground sign V-51 high centered at the head of the space and bearing the words, "State Disabled Pa k* 9 Permit Required". Section 7SO3(e). Signs should be shown at Qmqfillogre- -I- cite entrance uaii j-- Reamens leadiag-&& imoe -Yam= and primary public building entrances, displaying the International Symbol of Access and indicating the direction of travel. Section 7SO2(m). k. Site lighting of I foot-candle at grade level should be provided along the accessible routes of travel and at the parking spaces. Seciton 7502(l). 1. The passenger drop off space should be 12' wide x 251 long (parallel to the accessible route of travel). A curb cut (is/is not) required. Section 7504(c). m. The passenger loading spaces should be 4' wide x 201 long and parallel to vehicle space and accessible route of travel. Section 7SO4(d). Accessible toilet room facilities: 0 1 a. A 44" x 4811 minimuin unobstructed floor space inside and outside the doors leading to the HC baths and a minimum 4811 wide aisle to the accessible water closet compartments should be provided. Section S11(a). b. A 60" minimum diameter unobstructed floor space should be provided within the toilet rooms (with 121 maximum door encroachment). Section 511(a). c. Accessible water closet compartments should have a minimum cfearwidth of 4'6' and a depth of 41-8" and a 32" minimum clear entry width. Section S11(a). d. The details of grab bars to be provided at the front and sides of the toilet should be shown. Section 511(a). a. The lavatories should have a rim height of 33"-34" and a 29" minimum clearance underneath. Section 511(b). Lever -type faucet handles should be provided no more than 17" from the front of the lavatory. The water heater serving the lavatories should deliver water at a maximum tempernture of 120* F unless the drain pipes and hot water pipes are recessed, insulated or guarded to prevent contact. Section 511(b). Where towel bars, dispensers. mirrors. shelves, dryers, etc. are provided, at least one of each should be within 40" of the floor. Section 511(b). h. At least one urinal in the men's toilet room should have an elongated lip with the opening of the basin within 1711 of the floor. i. Accessible urinal(s) should have a minimum 3011 wide by 48" long unobstructed floor space in front of them. Section 511 (a). -0 General requirements: a. All areas in this building should be interconnected with HC accessible routes of travel (except storage and mechanical rooms). Note that stairs do not comply. Section 402, definitions of ACCESSIBLE BUILDING and ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL. and amended Table 33-A. Elevators s-Aswid las pro ided Fe eeeess7 Ilt—r. *I* 4,,= !,=. Section 5106 and amended Table 33-A. dur See Washington Department of Labor & I , ries for th requirements. c. Omission of an elevator to the second floor is subject to your approval. Section 003, Exception 4 and amended Table 33-A. d. Access to R-I accessible /adaptable dwelling units above the first story may alternately be made by complying ramps or grade -level accessible routes of travel. Section 5106. e. Accessible openings should have a 32" minimum clearwidth. Section 402, definition of ACCESSIBLE OPENING. (Note: V-811 doors may not,achieve this.) f. All doors in the building which have a latch set or lock set should have lever -type operating hardware. except doors to mechanical, electrical, janitor and similar rooms which should have knurled operating hardware. Section S501. Acce sible door should have an 18" unobstructed floor space beyond the strike jamb on the opor sning id 0 S g��6� u3l!�, Section 4 2, definition of ACCESSIBLE OPENING. Doors do not comply. 0091 (OVER) 4e&—. ,w,— C r 15_4+1,LkI C.-Il otay AM 1- A 12" unobstructed I'l pace beyond the strike jamb should I)t: provitleci oil the side opposite the door swing where accessible doors— e ecIttipped with a closer and latch. Section 402, definition of ACCESSIBLE OPENING. Doors do #lot comply. i. Stairways should have at least one handrail which extends 23" beyond the bottom and 12" beyond the top risers o7 each stair run. HC Amended Section 3306(j). The other handrail should extend 6" beyond the top and bottom. j . Stairways should have rounded non -slip nosings and have either the undersides of the treads sloped at 60" from the horizontal or �IoQf )Aie(s. Amended Section 3306(m,n). t &Z�J 4o G,4�4f%� LVC) Ramp shoilld have handrails installed as described in (i). LlAllz4 The international symbol of access should be displayed 3t the public building entrances. accessible public (fD ' toilet rooris and required accessible exits. Section 5503(a). Signs for the visually impaired should be provided to identify public toilet and reception roams, stairs. elevators and all hazardous rooms such as mechanical, electrical and storage. Section 5503(b). 0 S cific requirements: ��a5 Non -slip floor finishes should be specified in the toilet rooms, shower rooms, and along the accessible route of travel. Section SS02(c). b. At least one shower in the common shower rooms should be accessible --it should have a seat or to be enlarged to 60" wide. have lever -operating handles, a hand-hdid shower spray on 60" long hose mounted at a maximum of 40" above the floor, a 31V long horizontal grab bar at the rear and side. etc. ' Section 511(e). Thresholds should be flush or beveled with a maximum edge height of 4"'. c. Water fountains and public telephones should be revised and/or detailed so that compliance with Section 511(c.d) can be veriried. d. The manual fire alarm should be mounted no more than 54" above the floor. Section 511(b). e- A door or gate large enough to accommodate the disabled should be installed adjacent to turnstiles. Section 3304(cj). f. The bottom of the vision panels in doors \1 should be within 40" of the floor. Section 3304(i). g. Corridor is on the accessible route of travel and should have a turnaround area of 44* x q8" within it. Sactio—n -3-3075b). h. Corridor is over 50' long and should have a 60" x 60" turnaround area within its middle third. Section 33-0-S-rb—) i. Corridor is over 200' long and should have 60" x 6011 turnarounds. Section 330SM. j. Ramp should have a landing at the (top/bottom). Section 3307(d). k. Ramp is over 30" In rise and requires an intermediate landing. Section 3307(d) . 1. Ramp changes direction and should have a S' x 51 landing there. m. Door reduces the required width of the ramp and should be modified. Section 3307(d). n. Room _ requires level spacers 32" wide x. 42" deep. Section 3316(c). They have to be located so that they have an unobstructed sight line and have to be distributed throughout the seating plan. o. The maximum ramp slope in this room should be modified such that the access and egress to the wheelchair spaces is 1:12 or flatter. p. Power operated door should be designed and specified to remain open 6 seconds before closing. Section 5501. S. (Accessible /adaptable) dwelling units and guest rooms: a. units are required for this building. They should be divided approximately equally between the I bedroom and multi -bedroom units. Section 1213. b. Comments circled in item 2. 3, and/or 4 apply ill general within these units. c. Two-story (accessible /adaptable I dwelling units do not comply unless they have an elevator or all the required accessible rooms arn in an accrr-sible level. Section 003. d. Structural supports and/or grah bars should be dimensionally located oil (lie plans. Section 1213, exception. Note that two grab bars are required at the water closet. three at the bathtubs. Section SIMI. e. The showers in the HC units should have lever type faucets and hand held shower spray nozzles. Section 511(e.). f. The kitchens of the HC units should have a 51 minimum unobstructed floor space. Section 1213. (Please see the Illustrated Handbook for Barrier Free 0 if you want ideas.) g. In the adaptable units if cabinetry or shelving is installed below the bathroom lavatories or kitchen counters, they should be installed with screws, nuts or bolts in such a way that they are easily removed. Section 1213. h. A counter should be provided in the kitchen with a maximum height of 3OT", with a space beneath at least 29" in height, 30" wide and 24" deep. Section 1713. i. Door and drawer pulls, electrical outlets. etc. in the IIC units should be detailed so that compliance with Section 5501 can be verified. j. A non -slip floor finish should be provided in the bathroom. Section 5502(c). t'.. I L'131r-r - %-"[I rl /(- Plan Check #21! �) 3 / 0 Insulation: ZOE 2. 1906 WASHINGTON ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS COMMERCIAL*PLAN CHECK (Do circled ite= only) Jurisdiction JEW01a7v'i " (,V,-q a. The design of the envelope should be submitted for review so that compliance with Table —, Zone — can be verified. Sec 402(a), 403(a) or 404(a). b. Slab Insulation is required and should either extend down between the slab and the foundation wall and be at least 2' long or should extend outside of the foundation across from the slab to the top of the footing or to the frost line (6- minimum). Sec 403(c) or 404(c) (A.- -C� .1 d.. A 4 mil ground cover should be laid over the ground to the foundations within t a crawl space and should be overlapped at least 12- at joints. Outdoor air is required for this building. Sao 305. It'should be* no less than 5 cf m/occupant but should be Justif led f or the occupancy used so that compliance with Table 3-1 can be verified. The methods of linLiting air infiltration should be detailed and/or described on the plans. Sec 405 Mechanical systems: LThe size of the HVAC system should be Justified to be within 150% of J�he hPat )oss, tiltration and ventilation requirements of the building. Sac 407(a) aU4 /V c4dy 44, b. The heating/cooling equipment should have a minimum — rating. Sac 411 c. An economizer cycle is required. Sec 414 d. A temperature control system is required. Sec 415(a) a. A 10 degree temperature band between cooling and heating 3hOUld.be provided on the thermostat. Sec 415(a) t. A manually adjusted or fully automatic timing system should be provided'for the thermostat. Sac 415(c)5 g. The ductwork should be insulated with See 417 h. The piping should be insulated with Sec: 418 I. The water heater should be labeled to show that it complies with ASSREAE Standard 090A-80 and should have automatic temperature controls. Sec: 420(a,b) J. The water heater is within an unheated space and should be placed on a f loor insulated to at least R-10. Sac 420(a)l k. The swimming pool should be equipped with a pool cover. The heater should have a label indicating recommended healthful pool temperatures. The filter system should be on a timer set to operate at the minimal- number of hours for healthful use. See 420(a)3 The public lavatories should have outlet control devices to limit the flow to 1/2 (3allon per minute or be equipped with self-clo3ing valves. Sec 423(b) o, The shower boad3 should be equipped with a flow constriction device of 3 gallons par minute or less. Sec 423(a) 5 Lighting; a. The maximum lighting power controlled by a single switch should be limited to 16 amps (on a 20 amp switch). Sec 425(b) b. Each full height partitioned space less than 400 3f, rooms should have individual lighting controls. Sec 425(c) GAll the rooms over 400 sf should have dual level switches. Sec 425(d) a. The rooms which have natural lighting should have switches to control the luminaires near the window wall. The display lighting should have individual controls. Sec 42S(f) All exterior lighting except for signs and security lights should be on automatic controls to reduce or turn them off during daylight hours and period of nonu3e of the building. M,3o Llw The building lighting should be limited to watts exterior and �t6a �-Uterior. Sac 426 and Table 4-18. The actual wattage used should be cal;�u—lated to show it is below this amount. OCT International Conference of Building 0 i�c'ials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112TH AVENUE. N.E., SUITE 9-3t 10 0 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98(X)4 a (206) 451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICESOF CHAIRMAN JERRY J. BARBERA. P.E. REGIONAL MANAGER BRENT SNYDER, C.S.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL FRANK S. NATSUHARA. P.F— &L PACIFICA. CALIFORNIA SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER CHARLES J. WII I 'A P.E. FIRST VICE-CHAIRMAN REGIONAL ENGINEER EUGENE J. ZELLER P.E, C.S.O. JUAN C. INCHAUSM P.E. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING REGIONAL ENGINEER AND SAFETY October 10, 1990 RU13&WEN MARK CHANG. P.E. LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL ENGINEER SECONOVICE-CHAIRMAN Dick Mumma JAMES L MAN ON. C.B.O. DIRECTOR, DEP"N. 'ENT OF Building Official BUILDING AND SAFETY 250 Sth Ave N COUNTY OF SPOKANE SPOKANE. WASHINGTON Edmonos, WA 98020 IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN WILLIAM I— SCHLECHr, C.B.O. Plan Check: 2931 BUILDING OFFICIAL COUNTY OF WASHINGTON Project: Kruger Clinical Medical Bldg/Addn. HILLSBORO. OREGON ROBERT J. EPPSTEIN. C.S.O. CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL Dear Mr. Mumma: FREMONT, CALIFORNIA 809 FOWLER. P.E- AIA. C.B.O. Here are the mechanical and structural comments for the DIRECTOR OF BUILDING INSPECTION kalLENE. TEXAS project which we had promised to you when we finished JAN P. GASTERLANO. C.S.O. the nonstructural review last week. BUILDING CODE OFFICER ST. PAUL MINNESOTA MECHANICAL PHILLIP M. HERRINGTON, C.B.C. DIRECTOR. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY 1. A shaft should surround the roof exhauster penetration qENO.NEVAOA of the one hour roof /ceiling assembly shown in detail 1/M-5. DOUGLAS E. MOOD, C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL Sections 4305(c) and 4303(b)6, UBC. COLORAOC RIVER INDIAN TRIBES PARKER. ARIZONA 2. The damper shown in section 1/M-2 should not be able GORDON W. MURDOCH. P.E. BUILD NG OFFICIAL to close down below a point which allows the minimum 900 DANA POZ. CALIFORNIA cfm/each unit of outside air. Section 705 UBC. MICHAEL J. NOLTE. C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL CRESWELL. OREGON 3. The exact details should be shown of how the HVAC RON PERKEREWICZ. C.S.O. machinery, water heater, pipes and so forth are to be held DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT down and braced against earthquake forces. Table 23-P, COUNTY OF KITSAP part 11, UBC. PORT ORCHARD. WASHINGTON JAMES R. SINGLETON. C.S.O. BUILDING SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR 4. The wall penetrations of the halls in the work, checkout TUCSON, ARIZONA office and exam area to the southeast of the pharmacy may THOMAS R. THOMPSON. C.B.O. require fire dampers if it turns out that a one hour corridor BUILDING OFFICIAL BROOMFIELD. COLORADO system is required. Section 4306(j), UBC. ROBERTO. WEBER, P.E.. C.S.O. DIRECTOR. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING COUNTYOFCLARK 5. Also, since the pharmacy has to be separated from the LAS VEGAS, NEVADA lobby, the supply and return systems may have to be adjusted. ALLEN 0. ZEPPER. C.B.O. Section 3305(a,g). BUILDING OFFICIAL STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 6. In fact, it would appear that the corridor system should PRESIDENT have its own return air duct. There are arrows with a JAMES I— SIMR, P.E. squiggly line shown at every door. That, along with return FAX NUMBERS Order Department (213) 692-3853 plan Reme" (213) 692-3425 ICSO ES (2131695-44304 Administralk3n (213)699-8031 MainOffice: 5360 South Workman Mill Road e Whittier, Califomia90601 * (213)699-0541 Plan Check 2931 Dick Mumma, Edmonds October 10, 1990 Page Two air grilles shown in the ceilings of rooms IE11, IE13, 2R21 and others leads me to believe that the ceiling is being used as a return air plenum. This would violate section 1002(a), second paragraph in the area of the corridor at the very least. 7. A fire damper should be provided where the 8 x 6 duct pierces the corridor wall of waiting room 2QO9 near the lab. 8. The method of providing condensate control should be shown. Section 510 and 1205, UMC. It shouldn't spill on to the roof as this will prematurely deteriorate the roofing. 9. The flexible ductwork should be proven to be manufactured in accordance with UMC Standard 10-1. Section 1002(b), UMC. 10. Details of the wall fire damper installation including access openings should be shown on the plans. Section 1006(a). 1f. Automatic smoke detector activated shut -offs are 'n*e*eded for all the conditioned air fan systems as they all exceed 2000 cfm. Section 1009, UNIC. STRUCTURAL 1. Quality control (some of these should be noted on the plans): a. Special inspection is required for the pile installation, grade beams, and for the soils work. Section 306(a). You should approve of the owner hired/paid individuals. Section 306(b,c). b. The notes on sheet S1.0 mention field welding and masonry for special inspection. Actually, I can't find that on the plans in which case the notes should be modified. c. There will be shop fabricated and welded structural steel items which should be under continuous inspection or in a plant with third party quality control you approve of. Section 306(f) . d. The welders should be certified by third party testing agencies such as those licensed by the Washington Association of Building Officials (WABO). e. The pressure treated lumber should be branded by an agency such as the American Wood Preservers Institute. Section 2505. f. The roof trusses should be manufactured in plants you approve of also with third party quality control agencies. Section 2510 (f) a I Plan Check 2931 Dick Mumma, Edmonds October 10, 1990 Page Three g. The note on sheet S2.0 relative to roof trusses should be modified to show that MBF Engineers will review the truss plans and acknowledge this review prior to submitting them to you. Similarly the trus-joist plans should be so checked. h. The glued -laminated beams shovid be accompanied by certificates of fabrication which should b�e'given to your inspector prior to framing inspection. 2. How are the. bottom chords of the TA joists braced at the cantilevers such as shown in detail A!S6.0? Evaluation Report NER 200, item 0-1. 3. Web stiffeners may also be required at the points of bearing. Page 6 of the same report. 4. There should be a detail to show how the canopy trusses connect to the 3-TA's, Detail D/S6.0 is not specific. But how is the load shared by all three joists -- what connection is used in CIS6.0? 5. There should also be a double hip truss connection to the triple TJ I's near grid line E-1. 6. The spacing of the truss joists seem excessive under the HVAC systems. Note that drifting snow could occur against them also. 7. What does a "full moment" weld look like in detail J/S5.0? 8. The connection in I/S5.0 is pushing the -f" lag bolt perpendicular to grai n ' (Hem fir) and is also subject to twisting of the -4P plate. A redesign appears to be required. 9 . . The beam through which detail K/S5-0 cuts at door J at the director's suite should be shown on sheet S3.0. 10. The welded studs as shown -in detail F/S1.1 don't seem deep enough to resist the uplift caused by the post wind load moment. Section 2624. The connection of the post to the plate should also be shown. 11. Some of the piles at A3 and along line 13 seem to conflict with existing footings. How will they be accomodated? 12. The pile vertical reinforcement should extend to the top of the grade beams'and be hooked. Section 2910(e) and 2612(k). 13. The circular ties shown in F/S1.1 should be hooked at the ends instead of lapping. Section 2607(k)3C. & Plan Check 2931 Dick Mumma, Edmonds October 10, 1990 Page Four 14. These ties should be spaced 61' o.c. within the upper and lower 30" of the piles. Section 2607(k)3B. 15. The engineer took the total length of shear walls available and divided it into the earthquake force. First of all he used some wall panels which exceed the aspect ratios in table 25-1 ' . . But more importantly the force to the walls should be based on the tributary force since they connect to a flexible diaphragm. . A redesign is necessary for the interior walls. 16. The earthquake force should include the mechanical equipment loads especially those on the roof. Section 2312(e)l. 17. There is no means shown of connecting the roof diaphragm to the shear walls/drag struts in details A, B and E/S6.0 as well as the Mansard truss elevation. Section 2513 (a) . 18. How are interior shear walls connected to the roof diaphragm? 19. Drag. struts should be developed over openings aiid their connections to shear walls should be shown. Section 2312(h)2F. Chord forces may control for east and west directions. 20. How are the lateral forces transfered around the mansards? This diaphragm discontinuity also makes it difficult to transfer chord forces. How will it be done? 21. How are chord forces dragged around the reentrant corners at the entry on both the top and floor? I am retaining all data and plans in anticipation of telephone calls from the desi.gner and also that. I will be doing the recheck. I am taking the liberty of sending a copy of this plan checking list directly to him. Please instruct him to indicate on a separate sheet on which sheet or detail the corrections may be found. Please feel free to contact us if there are any questions. V tr I ours, rbera, P. E. Region Manager cmb �1 CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250 - 5TH AVE N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-= COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETM E. HMN Public Works - Planning Parks and Recreation Engineering. Q DIRECTOR 9 0 9 25 1990 September 21, 1990 PRCU. 13 -e4' iNo. _'/ '(Lt'r% plcz�, LBO 0 CNA Architecture Group " co"')!F. 3050 - 152nd Avenue, Suite 600 Bellevue, WA 98052 Re: KRUGER CLINIC ADDITION REVIEW COMMENTS at- -/0 The Engineering Division has completed its review of the proposed development. We have the following comments. After making the revisions, please resubmit one copy of the altered drawing and the red -lined mark-ups. When the revisions are satisfactorily made, we will contact you to have the originals stamped for approval. Storm System (Sheet C1.2): 1. Provide a minimum of 2411 cover over new storm drain pipes. 2. All storm water must be routed through detention system. 3. New 411 waste line on 216th Street S.W. must be tied into sanitary sewer, not storm system. Parking Lot (Sheet C1.2): 1. Entry grade off 216th Street S.W. needs to be revised. 2. Incorporate (attached) detail showing high traffic load driveway access. Gutter to be carried through curb opening, as shown. Driveway slope to be toward property from property line south; 2% grade can be transitions to gutter north of property line. Show planned elevations for driveway of SR-99. All on -site drainage to remain on -site. Parking Lot (Sheet A1.1): 1. Provide wheel stops adjacent to 5'-0" sidewalks. Wheel stops to be located 2'-0" off face of curb. As an alternate) 71-011 sidewalk can be constructed with 16'-0" parking stall depth. T affk you, ORDCON C. HYDE /Engineering Coordinator GCH/sfn KRUGER1/TXTCSENG '6 Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan I (ASPHALT CONC. DRIVEWAY VARI ABLE 5, MIN.. RAMPTYP' BACK OF'. PER. COOE SIDEWALK -18'TRANSITION::! (TYP) 41 FLUSH (-TY P E "A CURB a GUTT ER CONCRETE GUTTER CARRIED THROUGH INTERSECTION ISOMETRIC VIEW SIDEWALK RAMP (7'WIDE SIDEWALK) ISOMETRIC VIEW SIDEWALK RAMP (5- WIDE SIDEWALK) 777�\ CITY OF I R E:'VIS IONS �_2411 GUTTER SELCTIICN EDMONDS 'ENGINEERING 0 1 v I S 10 N ,-STANDARD DETAILS HIGH TRAFFIC LOAD DRIVEWAY ACCESS SCALE,, Fo;G7N 0 : PF:C'.D (%X4 NOV 0 2 1990 0, PROJECT:- 'Alog PROJ. NO.;_ FILE NO.;. COPIES TO: TO SUBJECT ,-IN 11 �, �h� ov,_ -OFFICE'CORRESPONDEN E. INTER to FR OM' Y J� 111PA 'Itt 'hity! 140 1. 0 f Edmon e, VT ADDENDUM NUMBER: ONE (1) Project Name: Kruger Clinic, Remodel of and Addition to Project No.: 280 TO: All contractors, subcontractors, materialmen and government agencies. FROM: CNA Architecture Group 3050 - 152 Avenue Northeast Redmond WA 98052 (206)882-6060 DATE: November 13,1990 This addendum forms a part of the Contract Documents and modifies the original Bidding Documents, dated November 7,1990, revision 2 and 3, as noted below. Acknowledged receipt of this Addendum in the space provided on the bid form. Failure to do so may subject the Bidder to disqualification. This Addendum consists of 3 pages and the attached drawings, Al. 1, A2.7, A5.6, and A8.2. CHANGES TO PRIOR ADDENDA: 1 . No Addenda issued. CHANGES TO BIDDING REQUIREMENTS: 2. No changes to Bidding Requirements. CHANGES TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT 3. No changes to Conditions of the Contract. CHANGES TO PROJECT MANUAL- 4. No changes to Project Manual. CHANGES TO DRAWINGS: 5. Sheet Al. 1, drawing 6, Site Plan. A) 216th Street SW entrance. ADD: "Barrier Free Access Signffi. B) Highway 99 entrance. ADD: 'Barrier Free Access Sign'. C) East Entrance. 1) DELETE: Barrier free access sign, see 7/Al. 1 2) ADD: mBarrier free parking sign, see 7/Al. 1 0 D) South Entrance, exterior ramp. REVISE: 'Handrail, New, See 12/A8.30. E) East Entrance. 1) DELETE: Barrier free access sign, see 7/Al. 1 2) ADD: 'Barrier free parking sign, see 7/Al.10 F) SouthElevation: ADD: Leader from note oWheelstop, concrete, 71-0' long, extruded, secure to paving with #6 rebar, 2'-6" long, each end' to object. 6. Sheet Al. 1, drawing 6, Site Plan A). ADD: Handrail, see 12/A8.3.2. 280ADDOI.DOC, Page 1 Kruger Clinic, Remodel of and Additon to Project 280 Addendum Number One (1) Page 2 7. Sheet A2.7, drawing 1, Room Finish and Accessories Schedule. A) Corridor, room 1000. 1) DELETE: Remarks N/A. 2) ADD: Remarks 14. B) Toilet, Men, room 1002. 1) DELETE: 6,9,10. 2) ADD: 6, 9,10,13. C) Toilet, Women, room 1003. 1) DELETE: 6,9,10. 2) ADD: 6,9,10,13. D) Entry, room 1004. 1) DELETE: Remarks 5. 2) ADD: Remarks 5,13. E) Stair, room 1005. 1) DELETE: Remarks NIA. 2) ADD: Remarks 14. F) Corridor, room 2000. 1Y DELETE: Remarks N/A. 2) ADD: Remarks 14. G) Toilet, room 2001. 1) DELETE: 6,9,10. 2) ADD: 6,9,10,13. H) Stair, room 2003. 1) DELETE: Remarks 11. 2) ADD: Remarks 11, 14. 8. Sheet A2.7, drawing 2, Room Finish and Accessories Schedule Remarks. A) ADD: 14. Provide signage adjacent to door, at strike jamb top at 51-60 above finish floor, with visual and tactile information stating name of room. B) ADD: 14. Provide signage adjacent to'Elevator and 'Stair, top at 6-62 above finish floor, with visual and tactile information stating use. - 9. Sheet A5.6, drawing 16, Toilet, 2002. ADD: Dimension and cabinet profile. 10. Sheet A5.6, drawing 17, Toilet, 2002. ADD: cabinet front protecting plumbing piping. 11. Sheet A8.1, drawing 2, Window Head (Jamb similar) A) ADD: Air infiltration barrier, run over opening, Y cut, pull and fasten behind gypsum wallboard. B) ADD: Sealant leader to aluminum window frame. C) REVISE: Aluminum window profile. D) REVISE: 1 X 6 oak trim profile. 12. Sheet A8.1, drawing 3, Window mullion(Head/Jamb) A) ADD: Sealant leader to aluminum window frame. B) REVISE: Aluminum window profile. C) REVISE: 1 X 6 oak trim profile. 280ADD01.130C, Page 2 Kruger Clinic, Remodel of and Additon to Project 280 Addendum Number One (1) Page 3 13. Sheet A8.1, drawing 7, Exterior Door Head (Jamb similar) A) ADD: Air infiltration barrier, see note, 2/A8. 1. B) Wood Trim. 1) DELETE: 1 X 2 oak stop. 2) ADD: 1 X 3 oak stop. 14. Sheet A8.1, drawing 8, Door/Window Jamb(Jamb similar) A) Wood Trim. 1) DELETE: 1 X 2 oak stop. 2) ADD: I X 3 oak stop. B) ADD: Sealant leader to aluminum window frame. C) REVISE: Aluminum window profile. D) ADD: Gasket. END OF ADDENDA 280ADDOl.DOC, Page 3 R A OCIT I 2-199d T 7S TO: V015 October 8, 1990 Mr. Vaughn Bray CNA Architecture Group Suite 600 3050 -.152nd Avenue N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Dear Mr. Bray: Hazardous materials and chemicals occurring in a retail pharmacy are very rare and if they do appear at all, they are prepackaged in small quantities for resale. I These quantities would be well under the amounts set out in Table 9B - Exempt Hazardous Materials Liquids and Chemicals Presenting A Health Hazard. Sincerely, ? ra-�' VO-11 Jeff Kauffman KAUFFMAN'S PHARMACY L November 13, 1990 Or-("n rNIA NOV 1 3 '1"0 PROJECT: V_N50.- Vaughn-Bray PROJ. NO.: CNA ARCHITECTS FILE NO.: 3050 152nd Avenue� NE Redmond, WA 98052 CCPIES TO. - Reference: Kruger Clinic (BUS Job No. 90104.01) Subject: Response to City Review Letters, 10/10/90 and 10/05/90 Dear Mr. Bray: Per our telephone conversation on October 19, 1990, this is a summary of our response to the City Review letters dated October 10, 1990 and October 51 1990 regarding Kruger Clinic. Comments from ICBO letter dated October 10, 1990 Mechanical Comments: 1. Shaft Enclosure: The shaft is shown in detail on the Architectural drawing. Also we will indicate shaft walls on our detail 1/14-5. 2. Minimum Outside Air Setting: We will add a note to the Fan Schedules which will read "minimum outside air setting shall be 3500 cfm, or 1/3 outside air". 3. A reference to the SMIFLA and PPIC "Guidelines for Seismic Restraints of Mechanical Systems and Plumbing Piping Systems" will be included in paragraph 1.2.1 of section 15200 of the project specification. Dick Mumma, Edmonds Building Official agreed that this addition to the specification would meet the seismic bracing requirements in lieu of including seismic bracing details in the drawings. See attached letter of telephone conversation with Dick Mumma, City of Edmonds Building Official. 4. Wall Fire Dampers: The corridors are protected by fire dampers as shown on drawings. 5. Pharmacy Fire Separation: The pharmacy is separated from the lobby, by a roll up fire door and fire dampers in ductwork as indicated on drawings. 6. Corridor Air System: The arrows in question are there to show building pressurization only. They are not indicating supply or exhaust grilles. The corridor is not used as a plenum and is being separated from the rest of the building by fire dampers. 1201 Third Avenue Suite 800 - Seattle. Washington 98101 - (206) 682-3910 FAX: (206) 682-3916 675 Almanor Avenue * Sunnyvale, California 94086 - (408) 732-3810 FAX: (408) 732-3822 5285 S.W. Meadows Ad. Suite 264 - Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 - (503) 684-4673 FAX: (503) 684-4675 Vaughn Bray November 13, 1990 Page-2 7. Duct Fire Damper: This duct does not provide any direct access into the corridor. So a fire damper is not required per NFPA Section 90A. 8. Condensate Drain: A drain line from the units to the roof drainy will be shown on drawings. 9. Flexible Ducting: Paragraph 2.1.1.5 of the specification will be revised to require the use of Thermaflex, G-KM flexible ducting. This ducting is listed under UL Standard 181. UMC Standard 10-1 is based on UL Standards 181 and 214. The manufacturer of Thermaflex stated that the testing performed under UL 181 is more severe than that for UL 214, and that UL 214 does not apply to flexible ducting (per Bob Hollister, 284-1476). Therefore, the flexible ducting used for Kruger Clinic meets the requirements of UMC Standard 10-1. 10. Wall Fire Damper Detail: A fire damper detail will be included on Sheet M-1 of the drawing set. 11. Smoke Control: This is defined in Specification Section 15970, 3.7.6, Smoke Mode Control, see attached specification page. Comments from ICBO letter dated October 59 1990 1. No mechanical response required. 2. Waste Line: The civil engineers MBF will correct this on their drawings. 3. No mechanical response required. 4. Washington State Energy Code Regulation: l.c, The roof U-value has been adjusted according to unconditioned attic space design. See attached U-value calculation, Sheet 2 of 2. 3. Infiltration Limiting: See Architectural plan, A8.1 details 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8. See also Specification Section 07468. 4-a HVAC System Size: The change in U-value for unconditioned attic space did not add any additional btuh or air requirements. 4.1 Flow Control Device: Specification Section 15440, 2.2.1 calls for .5 gpm maximum flow control device. 5. No mechanical response required. 6. No mechanical response required. Vaughn Bray November 13, 1990 Page-3 7. Waste piping will be hung from slab above. Hanger detail has been added to drawings. 8. No mechanical response required. 9. No mechanical response required. 10. No mechanical response required. 11. No mechanical response required. 12. No mechanical response required. 13. No mechanical response required. 14. No mechanical response required. 15. No mechanical response required., 16. No mechanical response required. 17. No mechanical response required. 18. No mechanical response required. 19. No mechanical response required. 20. No mechanical response required. 21. No mechanical response required. 22. No mechanical response required. 23. No mechanical response required. 24. No mechanical response required. 25. No mechanical response required. 26. No mechanical response required. 27. No mechanical response required. Vaughn Bray November 13, 1990 Page-4 Comments number 3 and 9 of the October 109 1990 letter which require approval from ICBO of information mailed to them will be answered upon their response. All other comments have been answered per the format you requested. Should there be any more questions concerning this please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, BOUIILILON9 S FFERSON & SCHAIRER tMER By.� Dennis Grovenburg Reply to: Seattle Office DEG:tas BOOM r%tofferson &Schairerinc. October 30, 1990 Dick Muy=A EDMONDS BUILDING OFFICIAL .250 Fifth Avenue North Edmondsy WA 98020 Reference: Kruger Clinic, Seismic Restraint Requirements (BCSS Job No. 90104.01) Subject: Telephone Discussion Between Melanie Petherick and Dick Mumma, Held October 30, 1990 Dear Mr. Mumma: Following is my understanding of our telephone discussion concerning the ICBO requirement to show exact seismic bracing details on the Kruger Clinic drawings. Mechanical Item #3 of the October 10, 1990 review letter for Kruger Clinic from Jerry Barbera (ICBO) stated that exact seismic bracing details for mechanical equipment and distribution must be included in the Kruger Clinic drawing set. I contacted you to determine the acceptability of referencing the S`MIFLA and PPIC "Guideliaes for- Seismic Restraints of Mechanical Systems and Plumbing Piping Systems" in the project specification, in lieu of providing exact details on the drawings. The "seismic guidelines" outline what mechanical distribution and equipment needs to be seismically restrained and gives standard seismic bracing and support details for the equipment and distribution. Per our conversation, i't is my understanding that inclusion of a requirement to meet these standard seismic guidelines into the specification would be an acceptable way to meet the requirement stated in the ICBO letter. We will proceed with the project including a reference to the seismic guidelines, but not including seismic bracing details an the drawings, as previously stated. If you have any questions or comments regarding this subject, please contact me immediately. Thank you for your attention. Sincere iy, BOUILLONY C11RISTO =zRSON & SMkLRER By Melanie Pecherick ........ Reply to: Seattle Office MAP : ta s CC: Vaughn Bray Greg Thesenvitz 1201 7hird Avenue Suite 800 - Seanle. Washington 98101 - (206) 682-3910 FAX: (206) 682-3916 675 Almanor Avenue - o - Sunnyvale. California 94086 - (4081732-3810 FAX: (4081 732-3822 5285 S.W. meadows Rd. Suite 264 , Lake Oswego. Oreoon 9703S - (5031 684-16M ;:AX- (SM11 rAA-197r MFMBF INC. - coNsanNG ENGNEERS 2505 SECOND AVENUE. SUITE 600 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98121 November 7, 1990 Mr. Vaughn Bray CNA Architecture Group 3050 - 152nd Ave. N.E., Suite 600 Redmond, WA 98052 Subject: Kruger Clinic Plan Check - Civil and Structural Items REC'D CNA 5 1990 PROjECT: eRX2646�VAJk PROJ. NO.: :Zko RLE NO.: vb.�? COPIES TC: UD25 Reference: 1) City of Edmonds Engineering Comments dated September 11, 1990 2) ICBO Plan Check Letter dated October 5, 1990 3) ICBO Plan Check Letter dated October 19, 1990 Dear Vaughn: MBF has reviewed the comments of the referenced items and made the appropriate revisions to the drawings. Our item by item response follows. Reference (1): Storm System (Sheet C1.2): 1-3 Changes were made in accordance with Reference (3) and discussions between Larry Sullivan of MBF and City of Edmonds Engineers Gordon Hyde and James Walker. Parking Lot (Sheet C1.2): 1-2 Sheet C1.2 revised and added Sheet C1.3. Reference (2): 1. Not applicable (N/A) 2. Revise Sheet C1.2 3-6 N/A 7. Settlement of the existing structure will have occurred prior to construction of the addition. The deep foundation system of the addition is anticipated to settle -less than 3/4 inch which must be accommodated by any inter -building component, i.e., piping, HVAC, and conduit. 8-16 N/A - 17. Roof diaphragm transfer is through plywood at soffit level. Partial height blocking is therefore O.K. 18-27 N/A PHONE (206) 727-9600 - FAX (206) 727-9610 I t . Mr. Vaughn Bray November 7, 1990 Page Two Reference (3): Mechanical 1-11 N/A Structural 1. Quality Control a. Structural notes require inspection of reinforcement and concrete. In addition, structural notes require that all construction to be in accordance with UBC 88. b. Field weld used in Section E/Sl.l. Note for masonry calls for No Special Inspection. Masonry note included since non-structural in -fill walls will be used. c. UBC requirements for inspection and quality control enforced since structural notes require that construction is to be in accordance with UBC 88. d. See structural notes "Structural Steel". e. Similar -to 1c. f. Similar to 1c. g. Revise Structural Notes. See Sheet S2.001 "Prefabricated Floor Joists" and "Roof Trusses". h. Revise Structural Notes. See Sheet S2.0, "Glued Laminated Wood Members". 2. Added blocking at bearing points to details. See revised detail A/S6.0 and others. 3. Web stiffeners have been added to plans. See note #7 on S3.0 and #3 on S4.0. Also added to details. 4. Details C/S6.0 modified to clarify proper connectors. 5. Detail I/S6.0 added. 6. Joists are now doubled below the long edges of the large mechanical units. Calculations indicate that these doubled joists are capable of supporting the entire mechanical unit weight, the entire snow load on the top of the mechanical units, and drifted snow, as well as Mr. Vaughn Bray November 7, 1990 Page Three dead loads. Adjacent joists which would. be subject to drifting are generally very short spans. Where longer spans are encountered only a portion of the span is loaded by drifting. 7. A sketch has been added to J/S5.O which specifies full penetration bevel welds all around. 8. The tube, though sloped, is welded at the top to act as a beam rather than an arch. The only force at the joint is direct vertical bearing. The base plate is extended to provide space fora nominal lag bolt. connection. The detail has not been changed. 9. "Existing beam" has been indicated on the plan. 10. Revise Detail F/Sl.l. See attached calculation. 11. Revise distance from pile to existing foundation. Alsof add provisional Underpinning detail and note. 12-14 Revise Section F/Sl.l. 15. This item has been discussed with Jerry Barbera, Regional Manager of ICBO. This building has plywood shear walls well distributed throughout the area of the building. The large depth of the diaphragm compared to the short spans between the shear walls results in a system that is more like a rigid diaphragm than a flexible diaphragm. That is, the walls will tend to deflect the same and carry the same shear stress per unit length. Distributing the forces to the walls on a tributary basis would result in a few of the walls apparently being more highly stressed than other nearby walls. Conversely, other walls would apparently be carrying less load than they realistically will be subjected to, considering the rigidity of the diaphragm. The average shear forces in the walls were increased 10% to account for accidental torsion. The plywood nailing selected provided a minimum of 20% excess capacity compared to the design stresses. The south exterior wall at both levels would be subject to considerably more load using a tributary analysis method and the lack of nearby parallel walls made it appropriate to design it by tributary analysis. This resulted in increased nailing at this wall at the lower level in accordance with note #2 on S2.0. The walls which exceed the allowable aspect ratios are exterior walls adjacent to high window openings. The Mr. Vaughn Bray November 7, 1990 Page Four aspect ratio of the portion of the wall between the windows is approximately 1 to 1, which is well within the allowables. However, we recalculated the wall stresses without considering the short walls, and found that the wall nailing called for on the plans is still adequate. We believe that, for this building, this combined analysis is more realistic than an analysis based exclusively on an assumed flexible diaphragm and tributary distribution of loads. 16. The roof top mechanical units weigh a total of 10,000#. When distributed over the entire roof area this amounts to I psf. The 20 psf roof dead load used in the lateral f orce calculations includes provision f or the mechanical weights. 17. Details have been the edge of the vertical face of Diaphragm stresses to the offset are the flat portion end of the mansard. modified to clarify the condition at diaphragm. The bottom and inside the mansard is sheathed with plywood. are quite low and vertical forces due resisted by the members at the edge of of the roof which support the inside See section A/S6.0. 18. Walls extend to the roof diaphragm with blocking. Additional details are provided on sheet S6. 0. 19. Drag struts, chords, and connectors have been added. See roof and floor plans, and sections A/S5.0, B/S5.0. C\SS/O and A/S6.0. Also see notes #9 on S3.0 and #4 on S4.0 and Typical Tie Detail on S6.0. 20. See response to comment #17 and #19. 21. Chord locations and connections are clarified on the plans. If you have any questions or would like to discuss any of the items, please call. Sincerely, MBF, Inc. ;4 A Greg Thesenvitz, P.E. GT: dkm MBF, INC— e CONSUILJING ENGINEERS (206)727-9600 2505 SECOND AVENUE SUITE 600 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 9810 FAX (206) 727-9610 PROJECT )<AZ (A (,P BY DATE Z -f� 1,Q I,'- CUENT JOBNO. 2S79F,9,0�t. PAGE 51 OF -.0 A ti 5S I Or N -HA N t rz Z b. T.5 It t" I im f4,-- V/ALL! (0 7) (.1 4 7 p�r- 7 Z I , % J. 7r-iy 0 %e b *, It ;3AV— RL,47f— 6-7 c4) 36 "0 k 41 '--4U MBF, INC. 9 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2505 SECOND AVENUE SUITE 600 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9810 (206)727-9600 FAX (206) 727-9610 PROJECT By DATE CUENT JOB NO. PAGE 7- OF ss co C,q 4f�e--Z F- 7 /Ot 7 c) ZY 43Z�) %35lu 7--16 7032— A, rJ -5nA 16 C a /L0 E3 70 7c Z. (3) -t 3 +.(0 703 2- -703-= '?Z 73 710-3 6S- �3)( Lo) Z-7 Lj'3 L) 9 7 3-7 4Z7 MBF, INC. o CONSULMNG ENGINEERS 2505 SECOND AVENUE. SUITE 600 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98121 (206)727-9600 FAX (206) 727-9610 PROJECT BY DATE CLIENT JOB NO. PAGE OF (ALL� 7 0, T7- 0 IvKe /Lg I 5-co C-0 s- �3) 2- -- 2� Lo:5 Z 40— (5-97-4) ':� 1 /-9 �7 -�M"rER /!--!�-7711A)' L t Z Z. /)oco Ile. To 7 " >e7', S PARL I N G November 13,1990 Mr. Vaughn Bray CNA Architects & Planners 3050 152nd Avenue NE, Suite 600 Redmond, WA 98052-5307 Sub�ect. Kruger Clim4 City of Edmonds Plan Review Dear Vaughn: REC'D CNA NOV 1 3 1"0 PROJECT: 14AC6p,,e1M-'1C' PROJ. NO.: Z 1) ME NO.: 7, 5- COMES T%a: 0 V;5 The following is our response to the City of Edmonds plan review of the Termit" set of electrical drawings for Kruger CMc. ICBO Oct 5, 1990 Plan Check: a. Items I through 3 do not concern electrical issues.. b. Item 4, the plans are in accordance with the State of Washington energy code requirements for lighting. c. Items 5 through 27 do not concern electrical issues. Washington State Regulations for Barrier Free Design: d. None of the items concern electrical issues. 1986 Washington Energy Code Regulations: e. Items I through 4 do not concern electrical issues. 7- f. Item 5 a. through f have been complied with on the November id plan issue. g. Item Sg lighting design will comply with the energy code requirements. A lighting energy calculation will be provided to indicate compliance. Oct. 10, 1990 Plan Check Comments for Mechanical: h. Items I through 10 do not concern electrical issues. i. Item 11 has been complied with and is indicated in the electrical specification and on the electrical drawings sheet E4.3. A CORPORATION . ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, UGHTING DESIGN a CommUNICATION CONSULTANTS 1920 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST - SEATTLE. WA 98102-3698 FAX 206-322-5643 - TEL. 206-324-1555 Mr. Vaughn Bray Kruger Clinic, City of Edmonds Plan Review Page 2 of 2 November 13, 1990 Oct 10, 1990 Plan Check Comments for Structural: j. Items 1 through 21 do not concern electrical issues. These responses should dear up the electrical questions on the plan review. Should you require additional information, please advise. Silp Edward K., Stephen H Principal ks:M SM:Itr.vdb LIGHTING POWER BUDGET - .. v ALLOWED INTERIOR '- EXEMPT MEDICAL TASK AREA - 5644 SQ Fr * B-2 15294 GSF @1.7W/GSF EXTERIOR BLDG EXTERIOR - 366 LF @ 7.5W/LF SURFACE PARKING - 38600 SP @0.0.5W/SF SIGN LIGHTING EMERGENCY EXIT LIGHTING TOTAL ALLOWED LIGHI'ING POWER BUDGET F: '" �v XT �- q NM I Mill3all 30673 WAM TOTAL ADDITION GSF - E)TIVIPT MEDICAL TASK = B-2 OCCUPANCY GSF 20938 GSF - 3664 GSF = 15294 GSF OF B-2 OCCUPANCY ALLOWED LIGHTING BUDGET 30673 VA CONNECTED IN'TERIOR (27788 VA) EXTERIOR (2815 VA) NET UNUSED LTG POWER BUDGET 70 VA ' EXEMPT MEDICAL TASK AREAS: IC06,07, 10, 11 1DO5, 09,10,11,14,16 1E15, 17,18,19,20,22,24,26,30 lF01 2PO2, 06 2Q10, 12,14,15,16,18,19,20 2-RO5,07,10,11,13,15,18,20,24,26,28,30,34,36 LIGHTING FD(TURES: 18 TYPE A @ 144 VA 2598 VA 20 TYPE B @ 115 VA 2300 VA 77 TYPE C @ 72 VA 5544 VA 2 TYPE D @ 72 VA 144 VA 19 TYPE E @ 115 VA 2185 VA 43 TYPE F @ 100 VA 4300 VA 53 TYPE G @ 135 VA 7155 VA TYPE H EXEMPT MEDICAL TASK I TYPE j @ 72 VA 72 VA TYPE K EXEMPT MEDICAL TASK 6 TYPE L @ 200 VA 1200 VA TYPE L2 ALT., NOT IN JOB 17 TYPE M @ 72 VA 1224 VA 5 TYPE N @ 72 VA 360 VA 2 TYPE 0 @ 73 VA 146 VA 1 TYPE P @ 73 VA 73 VA TYPE Q EXEMPT DK RM LTG 10 TYPE R @ 72 VA 720 VA 4 TYPE S @ 144 VA 576 VA '112-0 14YPE T @ 20 VA 240 VA 2 TYPE U @ 75 VA 150 VA 4 TYPE W @ 43 VA 172 VA TYPE W2 NOT USED TYPE X EXEMPT ETYIERGENCY EXIT TYPE X2 EXEMPT EMERGENCY EXIT 11 TYPE Y @125 VA 1375 VA TYPE- Z NOT USED TOTAL 30603 VA March . 17, 1986 E-CE IV ED 7611 South 180th St. Kent, Washington 9W32 MAR 1 18' 206/251-0638 F.PMONDS RK D-EPJ- Dr * Zufa.11-Larson Kruger Clinic, Suite A 21'600 Hwy 99 -- -Edmonds, -Wa -98020 REFERENCE: 1 hour rated doors All doors that have door.closers mounted on them, must be kept closed at all times, unless magnetic,hold-open devices are installed on the doors. This is a fire-marshall requirement and must be complied with at all times. Sincerely, WESTWOO CORPO ION Wally La z Senior Project'Manager WL/db� cc: Mr. Gary McComas..- Fire Marshall, City of Edmonds Mx-. Hal Reeves -.Building Official, City of Edmonds Seattle/Portland CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 BUILDING DIVISION R E C E I V E D February 28th, 1986 MAR 4- 1986 -EDMONDS FJRE MR-L Kathryn Zufall-Larsen Edmonds Specialty Medical Clinic Kruger Clinic Administration 21600 Highway 99 Edmonds, Washington 98020 A fire inspection on February 20th, 1986, revealed that several tenants were using blocks to keep business doors open during regular working hours. The use of this type of device to obstruct the door is a violation of Section 12.104 (e) of the 1982 Uniform Fire Code. The approved plans require self -closing rated doors to be installed. The owner must provide magnetic hold-open.devices for all doors that desire to remain in the open position. Please contact Gary McComas, Fire Marshall, to inspect these devices once they have been installed. J�' a0'-j4'_ Hal Reeves Building Official HR: j lg : 64xy June 25, 1985 MEMO TO: Hal Reeves Building Official FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: NEW COMMERCIAL AT 21600 HIGHWAY 99 After review, the fire department has the following requirements: 1. Fire hydrants will be required on site and shall be provided on a loop system. One hydrant should be installed at the southwest corner of the western most building. The second hydrant should be located near the southeast corner of the eastern most build- ing. Minimum gallon available is 3,900 gallon per minute at 20 psi. U.F.C. 10.301, E.C.C..19.75.150. 2. Six 2,A-10,B:C fire extinguishers are required for the first floor of the building. One 2,A-10,B:C fire extinguisher is required for the basement storage area. N.F.P.A. 10. I am also utilizing.the I.C.B.O. plan review letter dated May 22, 1985. Since all parties involved have access to this review, I will not elaborate on it's conclusions. � 21,0� X GLM: be 1000 C) 0 99 APPENDIX "A" The following table set� forth the criteria referred to in Section 10-10.060 D and by this,reference is incor- porporated therein as if set forth in full. FIRE FLOW (GPM) Item Affecting Flow Not to Required Reauirement Formula Exceed Flow Item 1: Ground area of. Building in square feet (A) 1000 + A/10 5000 + + SO 0 Item 2: Height in Stories (H) 500 (H-1) 3000 Item 3: Exposure to andfrom the Building Judgment. 2000 + TOTAL Item 4:. Deduct for fireproof semi -fireproof con- struction Item 5: Add for frame con- struction BALANCE Item 6: Credit for small fuel - load Item 7: Credit for automatic TOTAL FIRE FLOW REQUIRED ?�00 d ,�, . �Irl �,� 900 -Ii0 q, coly 12�6 0- 1/3 (1+2+3) Judgment 4 IT 11 J, 0 + 1000 S�OCO 3'� q C) BUILDINC MAY 2 3 1985 International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 12505 BELLEVUE-REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 208 - BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 - (206) 451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT JOHN E. MAULDING, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT DAVID A. BASSETT, P.E. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR MEDFORD, OREGON SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT MARK R. RODMAN DIRECTOR, BUILDING SERVICES SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT JACK S. ATKINS, PE. BUILDING OFFICIAL/ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA CHARLES CLAWSON DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARLINGTON, TEXAS PHILLIP M. HERRINGTON DIRECTOR , DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY - RENONEVADA SOL J. JACOBS, P.E. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA WILLIAM J. JUSTEN, P.E. DIRECTOR. DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND LAND USE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DONALD T. MacRAE, P.E. STATE BUILDING COMMISSIONER STATE OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA MICHAEL J. NOLTE SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION EUGENE,OREGON WILLIAM E. SCHLECHT MANAGER, BUILDING, PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON JAMES R. SINGLETON BUILDING SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR TUCSON, ARIZONA RONALD R. TREMBLAY CHIEF BUILDING AND ZON NG INSPECTOR II' SALINA, KANSAS CHARLES W. VOLZ, A.I.A. CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DIVISION OF CODE ADMINISTRATION ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO STANLEY WHEELER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA EUGENE J. ZELLER, RE - SUPERINTENDENT, BUILDING AND SAFETY LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOA JAMES E. BIHR, RE, May 22, 1985 Plan Check 1663 OFFICES OF JERRY J. BARBERA, P.E. REGIONAL MANAGER FRANK S. NATSUHARA, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER Project: Medical Clinic for Edmonds Specialty Group Address: 216th Street SW at Highway 99 Edmonds, WA Code Information: B-2 Occuancy, Stories: I + basement Floor Area: 18,900 + 5,160 Occupant Load: 189 + 120 Valuation: Unknown 1982 Uniform Building Code Seismic Zone #3 Type V-1 hour basic wind Speed: 80 mph Exposure Harold Reeves Building Official 250 5th Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Reeves: B (assumed) Data and plans for the above project have been reviewed for con- formance with the Uniform Building Code and some parts of the Mechanical Code as well as Washington State Regulations for Energy and Barrier Free Design. They have not been reviewed for compliance with requirements of federal, or other state and local regulatory agencies. Most of the following comments should be reflected as changes and notes on the plans and in the specifica- tions. SITE PLAN AND GENERAL COMMENTS I- Your Public Works Department should review the plans for drain - .age, street improvements, sewerage connections, etc. and your Fire Department should review them for circulation around the storage area portion of the building, onsite fire hydrants and fire extinguishers, etc. Section 302(c) and Article 10 UFC 4� 2. The cut slopes at the west and south property lines appear to be steeper than 2:1 which should be justified by a soils report. Section 2903(a). The top of the slope should be held back from the property line with respect to a distance "b" as outlined in Table 70-C, pages 735 & 736, and the slopes should be protected against erosion. Main Office: 5300 S01,1111 Workman Nlill Road * Whither, California 90601 1 (2 13) 699-0541 Plan Check 1663 Harold Reeves May 22, 1985 Page Two 3. The roof drains on the north side of the building should drain underground to discharge into the street or a storm drainage system. section 3207(e) 4. A fence should be provided on 216th Street for pedestrian protection. Chapter 44 5. Disabled persons requirements: a. Three Handicapped parking spaces, not the 2 shown on Sheet A-2 are required. Section 7503(a)l b. The details of curb cuts, signs, the drop off area, etc. should be shown on the plans. A note such as shown on'Sheet A-2 is not adequate. c. A sign with the international symbol of access and showi . ng the location of the parking spaces and main entrance off of 216th Street should be shown on the plan on Sheet A-2. The international symbol of access should also be posted at the front door. 6. Please notify us of the value at your earliest convenience. NONSTRUCTURAL COMMENTS am concerned that this building is actually a Group I-1 occupancy --"hos- pitals..., and similar buildings (each accommodating more than 5 persons')." Section 1001. There are 5 "procedure" rooms in this building which the archi- tect informs me are actually operating rooms and the total occupant load from all of these rooms is 10.7 persons. Item 10, Table 33-A. In addition, the corridors are 8' wide and there are surgeon scrub sinks. But the plumbing plans do not seem to show any anesthetize gases entering the rooms. However, if the patients in these rooms are to be drugged or otherwise anesthesized, such that they can not escape in an emergency on their own you would have to classify it as an I -I occupancy and many additional comments would be forth- coming in that case. 2. Assuming the B-2 occupancy classification is correct, two adjacent clear 60' yards are required to justify the area of this building. But three 60' ones.will be required when the expansion is provided. Section 506. This information should be kept in your permanent files for future reference. Section 506 3. The floors and walls in the toilet rooms 106, 116, 123, 146,t156, 170, 191, 195, 210, and 255 are proposed to be sheet vinyl. You should decide if this equivalent to ceramic tile that is required by Section 510(b) and if you do the vinyl will have to be a smooth surface. The showers should also have ceramic tile or equivalent. Plan Check 1663 Harold Reeves May 22, 1985 Page Three 4. Exi ts: a. The west elevation view does not seem to show a ramp to the main entrance door landing nor is it clear on the site or grading plans. Since Section 3301(e) requires this, it should be provided. b. The doors are to be openable from the inside without the use of key, special knowledge or effort. Section 3304(c). Many of the interior doors such as 108, 122, 149, 160, etc. use doubled key lock dead bolts which would violate this --the exception to that Section only applies to exterior exit doors 101, 122, and 164 (and the required signs and indicator for them should be noted on the plans). A redesign of the interior hardware appears to be in order. c - The corridor doors which are Type C should be listed and have been tested with the glazing indicated and should be factory installed. d. All 20 minute smoke and draft control corridor doors should have gasketing detail for the sides and top. Section 3305(h)l. The jambs for these doors shown in Detail I/A-7 should be listed ones. e. The wired glass in the corridor windows should be held in with steel frames not clips as shown in Detail 4/A-7. Section 3305(h)2 f. Exit signs should be provided in the corridor system where necessary to indicate the location of exits. Section 3314 g. The rise and run of handrail details should be shown for the exterior stairway from Door 121. 5. Type V-1 hour construction throughout: a. The siding on the plywood shown on Details in Sheets A-3 and A-18 is not adequate. Item 75, Table 43-B provides an acceptable alternative but the details should be shown. Note that both sides of the wall Detail A/A-3 needs to be protected as Footnote 15, Table 43-C, only applies to the ceiling. Individual posts should be protected separately --"heavy timber" is not equivalent to 1 hour, see Evaluation Report NRB 250. b. The balconies and overhangs do not have to be protected -but the wall portions shown extending through the floor sheathing should be completely protected. Table 17-A, Section 1710 and 4304(c) Plan Check 1663 Harold Reeves May 22, 1985 Page Four c. The 1 hour protection should be provided on the wall portions between the flat and pitched roof in Detail 2/A-18. d . The suspended "l hour accoustical tile" ceiling specified is a misnomer. The enti re f 1 oor/cei I i ng assembly has to be 1 i sted for I hour and the designer should specify the manufacturer and type of ceiling and provide justification that the listing for it is exactly for the floor and ceiling joist systems including their spacings shown on the plans. e. The roof rafters and ceiling joists shown in Detail 3/A-17 are spaced 2' o.c. which would not comply with Item 25, Table 43-C nor the Fire Resistance Design Manual by the Gypsum Association. Justification should be provided. f. Assuming that the suspended ceilings are justified, there are numerous penetrations which require protection. The devices to provide this should be listed and justified. Section 4305(b). Note that most devices still have a limit to the total number of penetrations which will be checked when the justification is provided. g. The space above the suspended ceiling cannot be used for return air unless the corridors are partitioned off from it. Section 706(b) 6. Attic and floor spaces: a. The total roof/ceiling assembly and the floor/ceiling assemblies over the basement have to be draft stopped. Section 2516(f)4. The location and details of them should be shown. b. Firestopping is required in the staggered stud walls, in the ".shaft area" between the wa-iting room and the stairway shown in Detail C/A-17, where interior'walls extend above the ceiling without wallboard, etc. Section 2516(f)i c. The location and size of the underfloor access should be detailed on Sheet A-3 and the"tize of the well should be large enough to provide workers access therein. There should access to each of the 3 partitioned areas. d. The number of crawl space vents should be given on Sheet A-3 so that the required net clear ventilation area can be verified to be provided. Section 2'�-16(c)6. How does the middle area get cross ventilation? e. Similarly, the roof system ventilation should be specified and justified. Separate systems may be required between draft stops. Section 3205(c) Plan Check 1663 Harold Reeves May 22, 1985 Page Five f. The posts such as shown in Section C/A-18 should be treated material. Section 2516(c)7. Also, the bottom of the siding should be shown to be 6" above grade. g. The "waterproof membrane" mentioned in Section B/A-18 should be desig- nated and proven to be such. Section 1707(c) and 2516(c)8 7. The roof: a. The flat portion of the roof should be covered with a Class A or B listed type of roofing. Section 3203(e). The gage of the metal roof should be given. Section 3203(c)3 b. Details of the skylight should be provided so that compl.iance.!with Chaptei 34, 52 and/or 54 can be checked. c. The overflow drains should be shown 2" above the adjacent roof drains. Section 3207(c) 8. The glazing in door types A and B, and glazing within 12" of any exterior door are subject to human impact. Section 5406. As such, they have to be listed impact type --not just tempered. Section 5402. These required panels should be identified on the plans. 9. Mechanical items: a. The mechanical plan should be submitted for review. b. Any water heater over 4' high should be strapped down. c. The heat loss for the building should be shown to be less than that required by the Energy Code, Chapter 4. Hot water spigots should be limited to 112 gallon per minute when not required for safety reasons such as in toilet rooms. Provisions to limit infiltration should be shown. Slab insulation should be shown on Details A/A-3, and B/A-18. 10. Locksets and latchsets should be lever operated or equivalent. Tactile and visible signs should be provided at Handicapped accessible toilet rooms and the stairway. Chapters 53 and 55 Disabled Persons Amendments. The drink- .ing fountains should have upfront controls. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1. Structural notes, Sheet A-9, and quality control: V a. You should verify that this building is within an Exposure B area. Section 2311(c). If it is in an "urban" location with open streets Plan Check 1663 Harold Reeves May 22, 1985 Page Six around it and few, if any, trees or buildings surrounding it, it is actually in an Exposure C condition. b. The wood bearing on masonry or concrete should be specified as pressure treated. Section 2516(c)6. You should look for the quality control mark of an agency such as the American Wood Preservers Institute— Evaluation Report AA 517. Section 2505 c. The structural steel, glu-lam beams, and trusses will be manufactured offsite. You should approve the plants in which they are made under the quality control criteria of Section 306(f). Note that a certifi- cate of fabrication and quality control marks on the products are required. d. The welders should be certified by third party quality control agencies such as those licensed by.WABO. 2. The trusses should be designed by a Washington State registered engineer and we would recommend that you have this project engineer examine these plans and indicate his review in writing. This would insure that some coordination between the 2 sets is provided. 3. Horizontal framing: a. The roof hip beams are 3-1/8" x 12" on Sheet A-4 but the calculation sheet 2 calls for 3-1/8 x 15. b. The size of the header to the west of dispensing room 231.supporting the 2 x 12 rafters should be shown on Sheet A-4. c. The floor framing should be designed to take a 20 lb psf partition dead load instead of the 10 lb psf shown on Sheet 3 of the calculations. Section 2304(d) d. The 2 x 12 floor joists especially the ones spaced 16" o.c. appear overstressed under the reqOired 2000 lb concentrated load (on a 30" square basis).for the longer spans and should be redesigned. Section 2304(c). Note that the dead load including the 20 lb psf partition load has to be included. e. The supports of the 5-1/8" GLB's and five 2 x 12's in the stud walls should be detailed on Sheet A-3. If the posts rest on tihe 3 x 6 plates, compression perpendicular to grain should be investigated. f. The KD blocks shown in connection Detail 2/A-4 should be checked for compression perpendicular to grain. Plan Check 1663 Harold Reeves May 22, 1985 Page Seven 4. Foundation system: a. The bearing value used in the foundation design should be justified by a soil report or visual classification by a soils engineer with the use of Table 29-B. Section 2905 b. The footings shown on Section A/A_3 and C/A-18 should be 6" below grade unless the soil report states otherwise. Table 29-A, Footnote 2 and Section 2907(a) c. The unreinforced wall shown in Section B/A�-3 should not be backfilled until the roof framing load is added to it. d. The retaining wall shown in Section C/A-3 should be justified by calculation. e. The maximum height of the retaining wall on Detail 2/A-18 should be given. 5. Lateral resistance: a. The lateral design for this building should be submitted. b. Boundary nailing should be detailed around the skylights. c. How does the lateral load transfer from the trusses to the exterior shear walls at the entry, Section D/A-17? d. How does the lateral load transfer from the sloping to the flat portions of the roof shown in Detail 3/A-17? Also, between the peak of the trusses and the flat roof, C/A-18? e. Full height blocking should be shown between the sheathing over the trusses and the exterior walls or headers, Sheet A-18. f. Drag struts at the roof line appear to be required over the interior north -south shear walls at the corridors. The nailing of the bottom plate for the upper floor shear walls should be designated on the plans. Drag struts also appear to be required at the footing level to pull the forces into the wall at Section A/A-3. g. How does the shear wall at this level, Section A/A-3, transfer loads into the ground under corridor 119? The slab reinforcement should be connected to the footing for the other locations. Plan Check 1663 Harold Reeves May 22, 1985 Page Eight h. The wind uplift on the roof system especially at the entry should be investigated and hold-downs provided where required. Section 2311(f) An invoice for this plan checking service based on the proper valuation will be forwarded to you under separate cover when you have determined it. I am retaining all data and plans in anticipation of telephone calls from the designer and also that I will be doing the recheck. Please instruct him to indicate on a separate sheet on which sheet or detail the corrections may be found.. I am taking the liberty of sending a copy of this list directly to the designer in order to facilitate the construction process. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Very truly yours, Jerry J. Barbera, P.E. Regional Manager ljh c/Salmon Bay Design Group EMM .a- 'I - 'v-.1 L-M �'- - 2-ain4ol-3w-g -------- — — Al'�U31N33 MIN30! TV03d.S A.1-MOUS-1 'ivo.wi IVOIC3ri ia SONOV403 ' L FA I Q -4 07'vt;N'� lw� Er jw"! --A p j . —P, c I I It tl t - 0`1 s 6�s aAeT tL.��JIOQ �-Ak.b , W., t� = 7= Trrm 7t, - cl A CO) � TU] APR 2:' 3 MS. Rose Water Engioneenng STORKWATER COLLECTION & RETENTION SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR Edmonds Specialty Group Medical Offices Building 4/19/�5 Design: W.R. Butcher, EIT Checked/Approved: A.J. Haugerud, P.E. �A A U,- V Civil Consulting 7728 ist Avenue N.E.. Sectl/e, 'M--shington Q8115 (206)522-7776 7D AZ 101,-9c�L16C7— Z) 7L) 4:5�,57� 77) A) J 3/,ej t- �-L4 51-1�516 FOIE L)E-75/611-) - -7I's al-- 77/�— 757 /7r--- 7 z7 77--- 77 "',(0( r-7 /L �4 Dv CD L �-,L ' Z 7-7 c—N C-n —1 cz— /1 '7-- -�� -,- -Z L C)9? -17 Z— -97 XIT -7 0 C -57 CD (Z7- 7 Lo (-o L F-7- z P7 L)��F C) Q A\ C) A- P-P E-0 Y, i Y A,�- L- A, 1 --7 1 C)& 07 C 6.q I "10 P. Z- 1 2- t5 i Z� Z. LOCATION INCREMENTAL ARF, A A RUN-OFF COEFFIC. C A C I AC TIME OF CON - CENTRATION TC RAINFALL INTENSIT Y I RUN-OFF Q (I AC 1) PIPE 01A� SLOPE VELOCITY AT DESIGN LENGTH FLOW TIME IN SYSTEM UPPER ELEVAIION LOWER ELEVATION' 140M TO ACRES MINUTES INCHES/HR, C.F.S. INCHES F. P. S. FEET MIN. GROUND INVERT GROUND INVERT cs 'a -5, 0 2. T-f 7 30. F LA L-,- �S- 6 -� I j - Z, 6 011L — 1�'A,Zl 1--33�5,211,33G,671,3 ------------ REMARKS". USWB. CHART NO.: S 0 0, C)l STORM FREQUENCY. 1(.'-1 yl o - o 2 COFFFICIENT' NAME OF PROJECT I'l 1) E CALCULATIONS (3y JOI) No.?I':��CQ DATE.�1�35SHEET6 OFa SHEETS RoseWatcr F--ngineering 7728 - ist Avenue N.E. Seattle, Vv'A 98115 z 0 June 21, 1984 MEMO TO: Bruce Finke Associate Planner FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING @ 21606 HIGHWAY 99 (ADB-62-84) After review, the fire department has the following comments: 1. Signs indicating exits and their direction shall be provided. 2. Portable fire extinguishers will be required throughout. GLM: be 4ft WN March 29, 1984 MEMO TO: Duane Bowman Assistant Planner FROM: Gary.L. McComas Fire Marshal a SUBJECT: PROPOSED AUTOMOBILE WRECKING YARD AT 21606 HIGHWAY 99 (CU-16-82�7_ After review, the fire department has the following -requirements: 1. A fire department permit is required. 2. Layout and size of the isles in the yard must permit access to all.portions of the yard for fire fighting equipment. Additional requirements will be made after,application for build- ing permit. GLM: b e 7 V PRCSPXCT 0-1107 civic CaNTER 00, FWTH Avg.'". T Aid Building Department CITY OF EDMONDS Snohomish County, Washington January 26, 1970 Mr. Fj E. Roberts Roberts Wrecking 21606 Highway 99 Edomds, Washington Dear Sir: Tho Fire Department, in cooperation with and for the Edmonds Building Department, inspected your business at 21606 Highway 99 on November 21, 1969, at which time you were presented a FireDepartment Notice of Fire Hazard. Your premises were reinspetted on December 29. That inspection indicated that no corrections had been made. A registered letter was mailed to you which was returned to the Fire Department as unclaimed by you. A third inspection of the property was made on January 21, 1970, which discloses that one of the fire hazards remains uncorrected. This hazard presents such a life hazard that you are ordered, under authority of Section 203, Uniform Building Code of the City of Edmonds to comply with the following: 1. Vacate these premises, as a residential use, immediately, and until the corrections outlines in the letter of January 21, 19?0 from the Edsonds..Fire Department -are met. The premises shall not be used for residential px�xrposes. Please contact our office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, WJS/cjp EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT W.. J. Slabaugh V, Building Official CIVIC CENTER 250 FIFTH AV9. N. Fire Department CITY OF EDMONDS Jack Cooper, Chief Snohomish County, Washington December 29, 1969 - Mr. F.E. Roberts Robert's Wrecking 21606 Highway 99 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Sir: Re: Robert's Wrecking 21606 Highway 99 Edmonds,, Washington The Fire Department inspected your business at 21606 Highway 99 on November 21 at which time you were presented a Fire Department Notice of Fire Hazard (copy enclosed). Your premises were reinspected on December 29, 1969. This inspection indicates that no corrections have been made. Therefore, under authority of Ordinance 1123 of the City of Edmonds, you are ordered to comply with the following: 1. All combustibles and tires must be removed to a distance of 15 feet from the residence. 2. Provide and mount a 10 pound ABC class fire extinguisher for the protection of the office and the main building. The above requirements must be completed prior to January 15, 1970. Failure to comply will subject you to a fine, not to exceed $300.00, or imprisonment, not to exceed 90 days, or both. Each day of violation after the above date constitutes a separate offense. Please contact this department if additional information is desired. Sincerely, ack Cooper Fire Chief Chief of Fire Prevention Bureau jjh enclosure PRosPUCT B-1107 D�Fmpk sy'sUffle Incorporated P0. Box 11230 Winslow, Washington, 98110 Contractors Lic. No. J1170 *42-C-09"M 628-2929 FIRE PLARM SYSTEM FOR THE EDKONDS SPECIALTY GROUP ED14ONDS, WA. This system will consist of 26 smoke detectors which will be placed in the corridors of the building. 7 rate of rise heat detectors will be placed in janitor storage closets, electrical rooms and lab areas. Manual pull stations will be placed at the main exits to the building. Activation of any of these devices will cause the system horns to sound and transmit a signal to the central monitoring office. Ten horns will be placed throughout the building. SYSTEM COMPONENTS One Ademco 868 control panel with 4 zones 26 Ademco 627H smoke detectors 10 Ademco Ufh-12 Horns 7 Ademco 601 Heat detectors 3 Ademco 529 Manual Pull Stations AU- OAItJ& /-s � 1412- /050c- FIP4, 'A) / a,5, AJ-4- IZZUIPMEA-Tt 15 U4- APPAW,&L) F�6it,M5 Ag& ATPaV-D 5MOKL btry-CMP- M MWUAL jDui-L -STAMoM R kATL OF A-V- W-At ZMCMP, 14 AJAgM 1-t>P,/Q FAcP F/,eF- ALARM CoArPOL N M Incorporated P0. Box 11230 Winslow, Washington, 98110 Contractors Lic. No. J1170 -01.2, 628-2929 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FOR THE EDKORDS SPECIALTY GROUP C-LIA)IC- ED14ONDS, WA. 21L-�o 14&jq <79 This system will consist of 26 smoke detectors which will be placed in the corridors of the building. 7 rate of rise heat detectors will be placed in janitor storage closets,, electrical rooms and lab areas. Manual pull stations will be placed at the main exits to the building. Activation of any of these devices will cause the system horns to sound and transmit a signal to the central monitoring office. Ten horns will be placed throughout the building. SYSTEM COMPONENTS One Ademco 868 control panel with 4 zones 26 Ademco 627H smoke detectors 10 Ademco Ufh-12 Horns 7 Ademeo 601 Heat detectors 3 Ademco 529 Manual Pull.StationB ACL IJIP,//J& IS - 1412- /05'oc- FX& W/a& Z-6ZU(rM9&Tr /-S U 4- APP9oJz-1D fYJ'�Jr5 AAF, ArWPS4 S SM V K,-V- D t r M M MWUAL NLL SMPM R -= RATL OF 9LV- mmt lce�-IDPI 14 = &AP-4q1 kt�OAAJ FAcP F/,U ALAW COAYMOL /;::�\ n incorporatea PO. Box 11230 Winslow, Washington, 98110 842-5453 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM LOWER LEVEL THE KRUGER CLINIC 21600 Hwy. 99 Edmonds, Wa. SYSTEM COMPONENTS: COUNTER Seven BRK 2800 photoelectric smoke detectors Two Edwards A1270ASPO pull stations Two Wheelock 34T12R alarm horns . These devices will be connected into the existing fire alarm system. All wiring will be 105 degree C. fire protective wire�, Smoke detectors are to be placed in the hallways, and a pull station and horn in each suite. SYSTEM COST (to include reconnecting the 3 exterior doors) $1045 - 00 A-L44-m 1-e�'677FD � 4JtC&-Pr&_b &�141_11 Fla,v- ) P PZ-4 eg zeme-axAo we um�vecl 124 1 " ay 'm e- 4A-60 D�Ympoc ALARM SYMSMS Incorporated P0. Box 11230 Winslow, Washington, 98110 842-5453 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PLAN LOWER LEVEL THE KRUGER CLINIC 21600 Hwy. 99 Edmonds., Wa. vo m4lfl Fxor— rxf.%?f 00 (� I S- SMOKE DETECTOR F::. MANUAL PULL STATION H- ALARM HORN LARM INDUSTRY 15PRODUCTS FIRE ALARM STATIONS • Non -Coded • Pull Lever, Break Glass Type • Simple, Positive Operation • Single or Double Pole • Single Action • UL Listed DESCRIPTION AIP Non -Coded Fire Alarm Stations are rugged, attractive units that are designed for easy and eco- nomical installation. All stations can be either flush or surface mounted. For flush mounting, a 4 inch .square box with a single gang plaster cover should be used. For surface mounting a Cat. No. A139250 steel box should be ordered. FEATURES 0 Easily Recognizable — All Stations are painted in durable AIP fire red. • Single Action, Break Glass Init i ating Station. • Choice of Field Connections — Cat. No. A1270 series have screw terminals. Cat. No. A1270A series have 6 inch wire leads. SPECIFICATIONS Cat. No. Switch Contacts All Normally Open Field Connections Screw Term. Wire Leads A1270-OPO Double Pole X A1270-SPO Single Pole X A1270A-DPO Double Pole X A1270A-SPO Single Pole X A139250 Steel Box for surface mounting A1270-GLR I Glass Fleplacement Rod (20 per box) M OUNTING.I.-."'. FLUSH 's Jr, wall F-1--l- 7, 4-1 'ki 2 3 J- �'Aqd 0 Details flush mounfin unit 1318 4! Sq. box A pliislo'- cavor: with single gang. 0Pen;n'g"-" a, pl!x� idth of 2-1".14- having overall min. w a and I flat Do for 0110" -C oded '4 ��'�t,125'V-AC,'6 1 4: ALARM INDUSTRY PRODUCTS e 195 FARMINGTON AVENUE 0 FARMINGTON, CT 06032 CCOPYRIGHT 1983 AIP-4 (1 1/83) MODEL IONIZATION on S SMO T MOKE DETECTORS FOR S YSTIEMS PPLI YSTEMS APPLICATIONS Model 1800 2wWmire 'L,� Allih Systems Bete ;WF-b '411 * Compact, Stylish Design o Stable Unipolar Ionization Sensing Chamber 9 Designed For Direct Surface or Electrical Box Mounting 9 3-Year Warranty Unique Unipolar Dual Chamber Sensor — Provides Exce Stability — 1.5% Nominal=vity — Wind Gusts up to 2500 Feet per Minute will not cause False Alarms Built-in Test Switch Visual Alarm Indication JWIst On Mounting Bracket with Tamper option BRK's Model 1800 Detector has been designed to meet the demanding per- formance requirements of UL 268. Among the most significant differences between this standard and those that it replaces (1677) and (168), is the addi- tion of a slow smoldering fire test. The conventional (bipolar) ionization type smoke detector, while extremely responsive to the fast I laming fires, is slug- gish in responding to slow smoldering fires, and therefore to meet UL 268, must be set to a more sensitive level than previously required (see fig. 1). BRK's 1800 Detector features a field -proven UNIPOLAR sensing chamber, which responds uniformly to the broad range of fire tests required by UL 268 (see page 2 for detailed information on unipolar technology). When set to the same sensitivity, the 1800's unipolar chamber is approxi- mately 2 times more sensitive to smoke than conventional bipolar chambers with comparable smoke entry characteristics. Therefore it can be set to a lower sensitivity than bipolar detectors, and further from the threshold of alarm (1 .5% nominal) and still will alarm at the levels of smoke required by this demanding standard.. In order to pass these requirements most competitive units are commonly set below 1% sensitivity, and therefore may be more susceptible to nuisance alarms. The Model 1800 system type products of combustion detec- tors.are designed for use with two -wire UL Listed control panels. Drawing less than 100 microamps during normal operation, the detectors can operate over a broad voltage range of 10 to 29 VDC. The dual chamber unipolar ioniza- tion sensor detects both visible and invisible smoke. The sensitivity of the 1800 is preset at the factory and does not require adjustment in the field. A solid state voltage regu- lator maintains detector sensitivity over a wide range of input voltages. A visual indication of an alarm is given by an LED on the detector cover. The visible alarm signal may be * 10 to 29 VDIC Operating Range * Convenient Terminal Strip Wiring * 2 Wire Supervised Circuits * Remote LED Option * Low Standby Current * Listed to UL 268 DETECTOR RESPONSE TO SMOLDERING FIRES Unipolar vs. Bipolar DETECTOR UNIPOLAR LIN POLAR RESPONSE Unipolar (1.5% nominal BIPOLAR set point) "M ------- ------ (Less than % Maximum allowable M x at nominal set smoke level point) (7%ltt) before alarm (7%/tt.) 0, 'm V 5 LEVEL OF SMOKE (in LIL 268 smoldering fire) Figure I remoted by using BRK's 669 Series Remote Alarm Lamp Assembly. Incorporated within the detector is a sensitivity test switch which makes troubleshooting easy without sophisticated test equipment. Field wiring connects to easy - to -wire terminals, simplifying installation. Easy to install, clean and maintain, this detector is designed for direct sur- face mounting (mounting bracket included), or mounting to a 411 octagon or smaller box. For installation and mainte- nance instructions, see the 156-127-XX Manual and the 156-210-XX "Applications Manual for System Smoke Detec- tors" for location and placement of the detectors. C. 7, BRK's proven unipolar ionization chamber Stable response to a broader range of fires! A unipolar dual chamber ionization sensor is more sensitive to slow smoldering fires than a conventional bipolar sensor and yet is less susceptible to nuisance alarms. Like a bipolar sensor, a unipolar sensor is able to detect a change in the chamber ion cur- rent caused by the presence of combustion particles. These particles act as recombina- tion centers, increase resistance across the chamber and reduce current flow (see figure 2). Unlike a bipolar sensor, a unipolar sensor (see figure 3) accentuates the increase in resistance by speeding the rate of ion recom- bination. The recombination rate is speeded because the unipolar field, weakens the bi- polar allowing for easier ion recombination. (See figure 3). Tests have shown that uni- polar sensors are approximately twice as sensitive as bipolar chambers in terms of chamber signal change to increasing levels 0 of smoke (see figure 4). Furthermore, because its response is not significantly affected by size or number of smoke particles, the unipolar's response does not decrease in a slow smoldering fire as much as a bipolar detector. Thus, its sen- sitivity does not have to be increased (moved closer to the threshold of alarm) to pass UL 268's smoldering fire test. BIPOLAR UNIPOLAR CHAMBER RESPONSE VS. SMOKE 0 w WITHOUT SMOKE WITH SMOKE + + 0 UNIPOLAR Luinipolar Z + F + region Extent Unipolar M of alpha po r 0 region particle 0 1: (negative < travel ions only) Z BIPOLAR V v ——— A— V V cr v W co < region Bipolar Alpha source Q %/FT. OBSCURATION (Smoke) Fig.2. Influence of smoke particles on the current in Fig.4. A Unipolar chamber is approxi- a bipolar ionization chamber. Equal number of + and Fig.3. Unipolar chamber is larger than bipolar cham- mately twice as responsive as a bipolar - ions. Ions recombine on smoke particles and reduce ber, with one plate positioned beyond the distance chamber. Thus, it will provide a larger current flow. traveled by alpha particles. signal swing for a given level of smoke. FLUSH MOUNTING ON 4' OCTAGON BOX Arch itectu ral/Eng i neering specifications The detectors shall have a dual chamber ionization sensor of Model 1800 industrial ionization, dual the unipolar type. The sensor shall have a nominal sensitivity source, dual chamber, unipolar V__ �O of 1.5% ft. as measured in a UL smoke box. It shall be possible to pe form a calibrated sensitivity and performance test on the Specifications 1800 detector without the need of generating smoke. The test method Control Panel Applications: 2-wire WNEG shall test all defector circuits. Visual LED Local Alarm x The detector shall incorporate a solid state voltage regulator Remote LED Annunciator which can maintain detection sensitivity over an input voltage Capability x RES—NT range of 10-29 VDC. Standby current shall be no more than 100 microamps. Current limiting shall protect the detector Operating Voltage Range, 10-29VDC against power surges and noise protection circuitry shall pro - Avg. tect the detector so it can be wired without conduit, where codes Current Limits: allow. a) Standby (typ.) 100pA@24V b) Alarm Current (typ.) Note 1 The detector shall have a mounting bracketthat allows fordirect c) Alarm Current (max.) Note 1 v surface mounting or mounting to a 411 octagon box. Alarm Signal: Shunt on A visual indication of an alarm shall be provided by a latching power leads light emitting diode (LED) on the detector which may be seen NOTE TAMPER SLOT at ground level. The visible alarm signal shall be capable of 1. Two -wire control panels must limit current to 300mA TE-73—, remote LED annunciation. or less. A special test meter shall be available to precisely check the 'All calibration and sensitivity of the detector. Metering points for the test meter shall be accessible on the exterior of the detector. The detector shall not alarm when exposed to wind gusts up to 2500 feet per minute. The detector's sensing chamber shall incorporate less than one microcurie of AM241. ALARM LED HOW TO ORDER — 1800 — Ionization Detector, 2 Wire, Surface Mount. 156-210-XX — Applications Manual for System Smoke Detectors. 669-00 — Remote Alarm Lamp (LED) Assembly With Rectangular Mounting Plate. TM-80 — Test Meter for Field Check of Voltage and Sensitivity Levels. Distributed by: BRK ELECTRONICS System Sensor Division 780 McClure Road Aurora, Illinois 60504 312/851-5000 Printed in U.S.A. C1800 8/87 E 0 Ordering Information and Specifications Horns: �fl models incorporate a resonant grille design for increased sound output. whepJoc* THE SIGNAL SOURCE . Model Number Input Voltage Rated Current CIBA (4) 10 Feet Mounting Options Approvals 31 T-1 1 5-R 115VAC 0.160 95 A, B, C. D, E UL, LILIC, CFM. FM. CSA. BSA 34T-24-R 18-31.2 VDC 0.063 92 34T-12-R 9-15.6 VDC 0.125 92 36T-24-R 18-31.2 VDC 0.042 go UL, CFM. BSA Strobe Horns: All models have 8000 peak candlepower strobes with FIRE imprinted on a,white lens. Horn and strobe operate simultaneously from one pmver supply (note 5). Consult Wheelock Customer Service for other lens colors and lens inscriptions. 7004T-1 15-W-FR 1 1�� 0.1156 T 95 A,B.C�D UL. QFM, BSA. FM I 7002T-24-W-FR 18-31.2 VDIC 0.163 92 7002T-12-W-FR 9-15.6 VQQ 0.125 92 7001T-24-W-FR 18-31.2 VQQ 0.063 92 F UL, ULC. CFM, BSA, FM 7001T-12-W-FR 9-15.6 VDIC 0.125 92 V7001T-24-W-FR 1 18-31.2 VQQ 0.063 92 G V7001T-12-W-FR 1 9-15 4 6 VDQ 0.125 92 NOTES: 1. Typical OBA at 10 feet is measured in an anechoic chamber with nominal input voltage. 2. All models are provided with in -out screw terminals. 3. DC horn models include RFI su ' opression to minimize induced noise on the alarm lines. 4. DC horns and strobe horns have an in -rush current of approximately 3 Itimes rated current during initial turn -on. 5. Strobe horn models shown in table are recommended for use on continuous alarm systems. For coded or march time systems. contact Wheelock Customer Service for models with separate inputs for horn and strobe. 6. Approvals: UL = Underwriters Laboratories. ULC = Underwriters Laboratories of Canada. CFM = State of California Fire Marshall. FM � Factory Mutual. CSA = Canadian Standards Association. BSA — New York City Boaro of Standards and APpeals. NOTES: 1. All 24VDC models have a rated input of 18.0 - 31.2VDC and all 12VDC models are rated at 9.0 - 15.6VDC. 2. Typical aBA is sPecified at 10 feet in an anechoic chamber with nominal input voltage. 3. Approvals: UL = Underwriters Laboratories. ULC = Underwriters Laboratones of Canaca-terminal versions only, CFM = State of California Fire Marshall. Fl"A Factory Mutual. CSA = Canadian Standards Association. BSA = New York City Soa�o of Standards and Appeals. 4. Horn and strobe operate simultaneously from one power sulooly - not recommenceo !or cocea or marcn time sysiems. (Consult WreeJock Customer models viah separate inputs for horn and strobe.) Mounting Options (All optional mounting plates and backboxes must be ordered separately. Specify color when ordering.) A SURFACE (Exposed Conduit) 8 SURFACE (Concealed Conduit) C OUTDOOR 0 SEMI -FLUSH Standard 4" SERIES SERIES AP SERIES WBB SERIES square backbox 7002 7002 7002 7002 7004 BB 7004 7004 7004 31 31 31 F 31 34 F I R E F I R E 6 jP 34 F I R E 36 34 36 34 F I R E 36 MrB B SFP E FLUSH (Hornsl F FLUSH (Strobe Horns) GFLUSH (Strobe Horns) SERIES SERIES FSB1 SERIES 31 7001 V7001 FSB1 34 36 FBB F It F P11P 12V modular fire control system 9 12VDC, 2-wire operation *Optional plug-in ex- pansion card for 4-zone capability • UL and California. Fire Marshal Listed, meets NFPA, 72A, B, C, and D Requirements • Full status indication • Class B protection circuit powers 2-wire, 12 volt photoelectric or ionization detectors • Snap -in master and zone expander allow quick expansion and replacement The No. 868 is a 12 volt, 2- wire Class B single zone Fire Alarm Panel. A unique track built into the unit allows easy plug-in of a 3-zone expansion card (No. 869) which permits expansion of up to four separate lock -in zones. Alarm and trouble LEDs are pro- vided for each zone. Each zone also contains independent disable switches and re -sound by zone (non -disabled zones can cause additional alarms). Upon activation of a compatible 2-wire detector or any normally open fire alarm initiating device, the No. 868 will automatically cause audible devices to sound, trip a municipal box, notify a remote station, annunciate the fire zone and energize sup- plementary relays. The No. 868 employs both snap - in master and zone expander boards for quick zone expansion and replacement. The removable Flat AL� COIFTOOL UM ANNUWIAM No. 868 cabinet door makes installation easy. The unit contains a Class B detection circuit for powering two wire, 12 volt photoelectric (e.g. 634, 634T, 646-12 and 647-12) or ionization detectors (e.g. 627H). A maximum of 30 detectors may be handled per zone, or 120 detectors per control. Two Class B signaling circuits are also built in, permitting use of 12 volt pol- arized bells or horns (see "Pol- arized Fire Signaling Devices"). Each circuit handles 2 amps with a maximum total circuit current of 3 amps. Remote Zone Annun- ciation can be obtained with the optional No. 870 that will annun- ciate 4 zones of alarm. System trouble indication LED, trouble sonalert and silence switch are built into a stainless steel face plate. The No. 871 relay provides a form C dry contact output for trouble conditions. The No. 868s solid state design is completely supervised for low battery, grounds, opens and bell loop shorts. Standby power is pro- vided by a 12V, 5 amp-hr. sealed lead acid rechargeable battery (No. 630) which is maintained by an integral battery charger. The entire unit is UL and California Fire Marshal Listed, and meets all NFPA 72A, B, C and D require- ments. The No. 868 is packed in an attractive cabinet and is ideal for commercial, industrial and institutional applications. Full status indication is annun- ciated either visually or audibly !or all of the following conditions: "AC -Power." A green LED in- 166 = ;' 0 t" moke ioniza ion s detectors Direct surface or electrical box mounting Unipolar dual chamber sensor: Provides exceptional stability Factory pre-set at 1.5% normal sensi- tivity Withstands wind velo- cities up to 2500 feet per minute Visual alarm indication Twist on mounting bracket Ultra -low standby current Listed to UL268 The Nos. 632H and 627H Smoke Detectors have been designed to meet the demanding performance requirements of UL!s new standard 268. Among the most significant dif- ferences between this standard and those that it replaces, (167 and 168) is the addition of a slow smoldering fire test. The unipolar sensing chamber re- sponds uniformly to all the fire tests required by UL26& When set to the same sensitivity, the unipolar cham- ber is approximately two times more sensitive to smoke than conventional bipolar chambers with comparable smoke entry characteristics. The 632H and 627H Smoke Detectors are set at a lower sensitivity than bipolar detectors and further from the thresh- old of alarm (1.5% nominal) and still go into alarm when they sense the level of smoke required by UL268. The 632H Series and 6Z7H Series are system type products of combus- tion detectors designed for use with two wire (No. 627H) and four/six wire (No. 632H) UL Listed fire control panels. These detectors draw less than 100 microamps during normal operation. The dual chamber unipolar ionization sensor detects both visible IX DL No. 62 7H/632H and invisible smoke. Sensitivity is preset at the factory and does not re- quire adjustment in the field. A solid state voltage regulator maintains de- tector sensitivity over a wide range of input voltages. A visual indication of an alarm is given by an LED on the detector cover. Incorporated within the detector is a sensitivity test switch for troubleshooting without test equip- ment * Field wiring connects to easy - to -wire terminals, simplifying instal- lation. These detectors are designed for direct surface mounting (mounting bracket included), or mounting to a 4" octagon or smaller box. How to Orlpr- No. 627H 2-Wire lonFiation Detec. tor 10-32VDC. For use with No. 880 and No. 868 Fire Controls or any 2- wire 12 or 24 VDC control. No. 632H 4/6 Wire Ionization De- tector 6VDC. For use with Nos. 330, 340 combination controls, 4150 (at 6 volts), 4160, or with Nos. 262, 263, 245 adapters in conjunction with Alarm Processing Centers. No. 632H12 (12VDC). For use with No. 868 Fire Control, 12 VDC Alarm Processing Centers with adapters, 4150 (at 12 volts), 4160-12, 4180, or any 12VDC fire panel. No. 6321124 (24VDC)..For use with No. 880 Fire Control or any 24VDC fire panel. No. 633 End -of -Line Module for 6 VDC System (one required). Also Nos. 633-12 (12VDC) and 633-24 (24VDC). 175 ratemo,fmrise and fixed temperature thermostats Thermostats are used to detect the presence of excessive heat and are therefore slower to react to fires than smoke detectors. Generally used in addition to smoke detectors in fire alarm systems, thermostats are not a substitute for smoke detectors. In residential applications, thermostats are usually ceiling mounted in each room, garage, attic, boiler room, storage area, etc. Use this chart to select the Thermostat which is correct for your application. Thermostat Selection Chart Model No. O.Q - Open Circuit C.C. - Closed Circuit Listing Rate -of- Rise Feature Fixed Temp. Setting Area Covered Sq.(ft) Comments 501 O.C. UL, FM, CFM Yes 135 F 2500 501A O.C. UL, FM, CFM Yes 190 F 2500 502 O.C. UL No 135 F 400 503 C.C. No 135 F. 400 504 O.C. UL No 190 F 400 505 C.C. No 190 F 400 O.C. UL, FM, CFM Yes 135 F. 2500 Slim profile sup- plied with revers- ible mounting ring. 601A O.C. UL, FM, CFM Yes 200 F 2500 The No. 501 and No. 501A Combina. tion Rate-of-Rise/Fixed Temperature Thermostats are UL Listed for protec- ting spaces of 50' x 50' (or 2500 square feet) —and FM approved for protecting spaces of 30' x 30' (900 square feet). They will initiate an alarm signal when a fixed temperature is reached: 1350 for the No. 501, 1900 for the No. 501A. In addition, since many fires grow rapidly in intensity, resulting in fast rising tem- peratures, the No. 501 and No. 501A are designed to sense and respond to any increase in temperature which is ab- normally fast. Rate -of -Rise Thermostats should not be tested with a match since this will neces- sitate replacing the unit. When tripped by rapid temperature increases, these ther- mostats will reset themselves as long as the fixed setting has not been reached. The Nos. 502, 503, 504 and 505 Ther- mostats are compact and attractive. The streamlined design is extremely effi- Ademco's U.L. Listed Nos. 601 and 601A Rate -of -Rise Fixed Temperature Thermostats project a mere 1-30' from the ceiling. Their smooth, pleasing con- tours and all -white finish make them at- tractive in any setting. The thermostats feature a field -proven pneumatic rate -of -rise element and a fixed temperature element with a special fusible alloy unsurpassed for long term stability and reliability. They also incor- porate an external heat collector that drops away when the alloy fuses, pro- viding unmistakable visual indication cient, resulting in fast response to fire. The four terminals provided on each ther- mostat make parallel wiring simple since no more than one wire is fastened to any terminal post. The gold flashed electrical contacts are completely en- closed, preventing malfunction from dust and moisture in the air The 1350 ther- mostats are ideal for normal room use. Use the 1900 thermostats where ambient temperatures exceed 1000F, such as in attics, boiler rooms and hot kitchens. Note: The No. 503 and No. 505 Thermo- stats are "normally closed" and are rec- ommended only for special circuits. To use thermostats on burglar alarm sys- tems, we recommend No. 502 and No. 504 thermostats wired across the protec- tive circuit to provide a closure upon ac- tivation. How To Order No. 501 Thermostat. 1350 open contact, U.L. Listed. No. 501A Thermostat. 1900 open con - that the fixed temperature element has operated. ' The detector attaches to the mounting plate with a simple push and twist m tion. ft can be detached with the sa motion in reverse. The mounting plate is molded of wh e self -extinguishing thermoplastic, rat at 1050C. It is extremely strong, yet resi ent enough to adapt to uneven mounting ui faces. How To Order No. 601 Rate-of-RIse and Fixed Temp- erature Thermostat. 135OF U.L. Listed No. 502 No. 501 L tact, U.L. Listed. The following "fixed temperature" thermo- stats are recommended for residential or commercial use. Underwriters' Laborator- ies permits spacing of 20' x 20' giving area coverage of 400 sq. ft. per thermo- stat. No. 502 Thermostat. 1350 open contact, U.L. Listed. No. 504 Thermostat. 1900 open circuit, U.L. Listed. No. 503 Thermostat. 1350 closed circuit. No. 505 ThermostatAgao-ekme8rvircuit. Wk x bu spacing. vvn"e 1A Rate-of-FUse an4 FlWd Temp- F Thermostat. 200OF L. Listed .L. L for 50 177 waterflow switch • Monitors sprinkler systems • DPDT contacts allow connec- tion to any fire alarm system • Built-in retard avoids false alarms from water surges Ademco No. 452 Waterflow Switches are designed to be used in conjunction with fire alarm systems to supervise the flow of water in sprinkler pipes. When a sprinkler head opens and water flows, the switch contacts on the No. 452 close. To compensate for surges in the water lines, the No. 452 has a pneumatic, ad- justable retard mechanism. This allows for a delay from 0 to 90 seconds between the time water starts to flow and the time that the switch activates. If the water flow is only a temporary surge, and stops before the delay time is completed, the switch will recycle automatically and be ready to report a subsequent surge or alarm. To install the No. 452 Switch, only a 2" hole in the sprinkler pipe is needed. The paddle rolls up and can be inserted into this hole. The switch is then fastened to the pipe by a U-boft. Switches are avail- able with saddles for numerous pipe sizes from 4" diameter to 8" diameter pipe. 100% testing of each switch is conducted at greatly elevated pressures to make certain that leaks will not develop. The paddle is made of a special polyethylene material which is designed to withstand almost any chemical or mineral element in water. It is vastly superior to the Monel paddles that have previously been avail- able. (The No. 452 cannot be used in "dry" systems). fire alarm • Tough lexan construction • Bright fire alarm red coloring with white lettering • Resettable mechanical latch • Two phenolic (break glass) rods • Terminal blocks for easy wiring • Single pole, single throw switch (3 amps, 125 volts) • UL listed The No. 532 Manual Pull Station is noncoded, features a dual action me- chanism and is operable with a phenolic break rod. Its unique "dual action" design resists false activation. Operator must push in door and pull down handle to activate. Reset then is only possible with a special tool supplied. Constructed pull of tough Lexan, the pull station meets all requirements for professional application. Also available are the No. 532-1 back box and No. 532-9 replacement break rods (12 per pkg.) for the No. 532. The No. 862 Stopper 11 Fire Alarm Pull Station Protector is a UL Listed clear Lexan shield that fits over the Nos. 532, 529 and most other manual pull stations. The unit is a tampered protective cover which will produce a loud, local pre -alarm warning signal when the shield is lifted. It is believed that this pre -alarm warning signal will deter false alarms. The battery - powered horn can be silenced on the No. 862 by merely closing the Lexan shield. The No. 862 can be used with both a flush or surface mounted pull station. The No. 862-1 Spacer may be required for surface mount pull stations. anual pull station No. 529 Manual Pull Station, a pleas- ingly designed plastic case insures a lifetime of dependable operation from the No. 529. An inexpensive, easily replaced fiber disc breaks when the pull station is operated. THIS ELIMINATES ALL DAN- GER FROM BROKEN GLASS! Once op- erated, it can be reset only by an author- ized person. Installation is quick and simple. The pull station may be flush mounted to any standard electrical box of surface mount- ed using an Ademco No. 44 Aluminum Box. How To Order No. 529 Pull Station No. 529-2 Pull Station. Double Pole Sin- gle Throw Contacts No. 530 Replacement Disc No. 44 Aluminum Box for 529, 529-2 UL 0 vd R No. 452 How to Order No. 452 Waterflow Switch. UL, FM Listed, supplied with DPUF contacts, built- in 0 to 90 second retard mechanism. Available for 4, 6 and 8 inch pipes. Make sure to specify pipe size when ordering (452-4, 452-6, 452-8). stations FIR E ULL LIFT HERE How to Order No. 532 Manual Pull Station No. 5324 Back Box for No. 532 No. 532-9 Package of 12 Break Rods for No. 532 No. 662 Stopper 11 Fire Alarm Pull Station Protector No. 8624 Spacer 180 R d olar'ized fire signalling 0 evices No. UFH12/UFF FIRE IN. fow', 69t 8'9 No. UFP6-12 No. UFP6-24 ilib . No. WFP8-12 KI VAICOO-13A No. UFS12/UFS24 U. 1Z For1kose install�,,Ws where code re- q remen Is Za ui cify the use of a super- vised signalling circuit or where a panel with a supervised bell loop is needed, you can select from these Ademco Sounding Devices. All Signalling Devices offer the following: - Low Current Drain - Polarized for use with 12 and 24-Volt fire control panels (Ademco 868, 88Q 83Q 830-24, 834) - Mounts on standard electrical boxes - UL listed How To Order UFH12 12VDC Polarized Fire Alarm Horn. UFH24 24VDC Model. UFS12 12VDC Polarized Fire Alarm Hom with Flashing Strobe Light. UFS24 24VDC Model. UFHFP Semi -Flush Plate for UFH and UFS Series. UFP642 6"Bell, 12VDC, Polarized, UL for fire. UFP6-24 24VDC Model. U No. WFP10-12 No. WFP10-24 WFP8-12 8" Bell, 12VDC, Polarized, Weatherproof, UL for fire. WFP8-24 8" Bell, 24VDC, Polarized, Weatherproof, UL for fire. WFP10-12 10" Bell, 12VDC, Polarized, Weatherproof, UL for fire. WFP10-24 10" Bell, 24VDC, Polarized, Weatherproof, UL for fire. No. 803FP-RD Flush Plate for UFHIUFS Red. No. 803FBB Flush Back Box for 803FP-RD. No. 803WB-RD Weather Resistant Sur- face Mount Box for UFH/UFS. Catalog Nominal Voltage Rated T Ical (Electrical No. Type Voltage DC Range Current mA dF 10' Box) Comments Listings Panels UFH24 Horn 24 18-31.2 63 90-94 4" Square UL, FM ' Cal. 880, Fire Marshal 830-24 834 H12 Horn 12 9.0-15.6 125 9D-94 4" Square UL, FM, Cal. 868,830 Fire Marshal UFS24 Horn/ 24 18-31.2 63 86 4!' Square Xenon, UL, FM, Cal. 88Q Strobe Flashtube Fire Marshal 830-24, 8000 Candle- peak 834 UFS12 Horn/ ji�cwer 3 flashes UL, FM, Cal. 886� Strobe 12 9.0-15.6 125 86 4" Square per sec. Fire Marshal 830 UFP6-24 6"Bell 24 16-48 80 81 31/2" Octagon UL 880, 830-24, 834 UFP6-12 6" Bell 12 10-19 150 85 31/2" Octagon UL 868,830 WFP8-24 8" Bell 24 16-48 80 85 4" Square Weatherproof UL 88Q 1 for indoor or 830-24, outdoor use 834 WFP842 8" Bell 12 10-19 150 85 4" Square Weatherproof UL 868, for indoor or 830 outdoor use WFP10-24 10" Bell 24 16-48 80 85 4" Square Weatherproof UL 88Q for indoor or 830-24 outdoor use 834 WFP1042 10" Bell 12 10-19 150 85 4" Square Weatherproof UL 868, for indoor or 830 outdoor use Finish: Fire Alarm Gloss Red Enamel Strobe Lens-Lexan, red letters on white translucent lens . 179 65 t bcx) �Vcl