21615 80TH AVE W.PDF111111111111
7189
21615 80TH AVE W
CITY OF EDMONDS
PUBL VIORKS-DEPARTMENTj ENGINAPING DIVISION: AU G 3 1978
MORE
OR RIGHT-OF-WAY- CONST
Public woms uupL.
MUST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION.PURPOSES'
�Appli,c-ant to Complete Parts A and B
A, Permit to be issued to: S nohomish Coun,ty P.U.D. No. 1
For -Work at:(address or vicinity) 21615 80th Avenue West, Edmonds
Type of Work to be done: install underground power system to serve Recon
(attach drawing when applicable).. Enterprises
Time Required -- Start: August 14, 1978 . �Knish:
Owner:
Name
in one day
W.O. #_ 886691
-Mailing Address
City State Zip Telephone Number
Contractor: Sn.oholmish County P.U.D. No. I
r
Name Stiftelictn"s'e -Number
Y. 0'. . Bo.x' 110. 7
Mailing Address'
Everett Washington 98206 259-9774
S." Grey-
ngi
City State Zi p Telephone. Number E ineer
INDE�-2,'ITY: Applicant understands and by his -signa-ture to this -application,, a. A,
gree s
-to hold the City of Edmonds -hartiless "fr
om any injurie�s., damages, -or claims of any
'.kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made.against
the applicant orthe City of'Edmonds, or any of its departments :or employees,
including or not'limited to the -defense of any legal proceedings including defense
costs, court costs, and attorneyrfees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the, contractor is responsible for workmanship and
materials for,a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance
of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until
the final street patch is completed, at which time a -debit or credit will -be
processed for issuance to the applicant.
WQrk is subJect to inspection and testaration in accordance with City Code. A
24-hour notice is re in tion by Engineering. Call 775-2525,.ext. 220.
1 understand that t is perm t m t be a . l.abl at the job -site . for inspection
�purposes at all tim
Signatu : ltss -X�g_ent Date:812-
Owne f-v-r
C, TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY:
Date Issued: 44�/Z/ Permit No.: -7 8' Fee:
Security Bond/�
Time Authorized:
PROVED B
Date :
CITY OF EDMOND S
PUBLOWORKS DEPARTMENTj ENGINEE O.4G- DIVSTI'
REET FILE
APPLICATION FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
in.La ZnarlLl rluol Dn 'ftV'ft1LanLL Ai ItIt Jub blir, YUKFU6L6
sees
Applicant to Complete Parts A and B
A. Permit to be issued to.
For.Work at:(address or vicinity)
Type of Work to be done:
(attach drawing when applicable)
/_PJ'P
Time Required --.Start: 7Z ?'en Finish:
Owner:
Na
MaU ing Address
A;-y c)
-34
City State f-D Zip Telephone Number
14
Contractor: i4,41 7-- z Z? -7
Name State License Number
'90x'
Mailing Address
P L-)D - R wo'D p LA) iq S7 ?
City State Zip Telephone Number
NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PER11IT ISSUANCE
Bi� INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application., agrees
to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any
kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against
the'applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees,
including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense
costs, court costs, and attorney fees.by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship'and
materials for a period of one year following * the final inspection and acceptance
of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (est ' imated restoration fee) will be held until
the. -final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be
processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is subject to inspection,and restoration in accordance with City Code. A
24-hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, ext. 220.
I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection
purposes at all times.
Signature:
Owner or Agent
TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY:
Date Is . s ued: 2-7 - 7 P e r m i t N o
Security Bond: �JIA-
Time Authorized:
04
Date:
f)- 7 71 - (P 4 -4)
tZ_70
APPROVED BY
Date 2 7 - __21P
ci
nj
1. �., 4
- .0
P UB,L 1 *0
12
DEPARTMENTj ENGINEE 1w,
WJ�1U1M9t%E
ISION
LL � 1) 1 L, P, L'I _L I I'l U 0 1 1) Z tj V JA _L Lj tj 1) L, L R I 1 11 r
JUJJ �) I I t� f.4 U L, LIUN PUKFUSES
C4PJ b 1! t U
Applicant to Complete Parts'A and B
A. Permit to be issued t o
For Work at :(address or vicinity)
Type of Work to be done:
(attach drawing when applicable)
Time Required --.Start: Finish ZZ
Owner:
LV
Na7�
Ma:Uing AddLress
.1
Z_ 11_11t�F (f 7 J — 7� ��? __ S i� �1; �/.: � / 2
At S
.City State Zip Telephone Number
Contractor:
Name State License Number
ficl x
Mailing Address
P L fZ L U 0 V H
City State Zip Telephone Number
NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE ** .
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees
to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claim's of any
kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against
the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees,
including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense
costs, court costs, and attorney fees -by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and
materials for a period of one year following the final inspection a*nd acceptance
of the restoration by the.Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until
the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be
processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is subject to inspectionand restoration in accordance with City Code. A
24-hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, ex't. 220.
I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection
purposes at all times.
Signature: Date:
Owner or Agent
TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY:
Date Issued 7 (`�3 Permit No. :-,,)Z
Security Bond: kJ 5-1-S
Time Authorized:
APPROVED B YS �__ __t� Date
I �) - I / I - f Q , " -f - - I ) r, .. -7 C) -, - ( , - ; - - A )
-? �/7;7/
le-,,Il-
Ole C-OW/4
60//0,
a's C~
740?�
MEMO TO: Art Hous-ler, Director
Finance Department
FROM: Leif R. Larson
Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT OF STREET CUT SECURITY DEPOSIT
ORDINANCE #1935
R/W CONSTR. PERMIT NO.: [-7 8- 1.8 0
DATE ISSUED: 7-27-78
L * OCATION'OF WORK: 21615 80th Ave.-W.
SECURITY DEPOSIT AMOUNT: 72. )C
RECEIPT NO.,& DATE: 3738 �,-2-78
.COMPLETION DT. OF REPAIR:
Please prepare a Treasurer's Check in the amount of $ None
made payable to the following:
The balance o'f the deposit in the amount of $ 72. 00 is
to remain in S.treet Div-ision Revenue Fund �-o 0-389.10.
Admi Dt.
7/31/78
41 HLE 'o
PUBLIC q0RKS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
PROJECT NAME: ONIT Ccwrio F I L E i:y esoLow LzAryffs
x f Tp 1�7!�A�Z4 �p YCV, -
AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF THE PRO ' POSAL HAS BEEN
COMPLETED AND THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS HAVE
BEEN MADE:
E. DITTY 05nfla
... ........
AM ft
00; 1" DATE:
PREPARED BY:fj I hpl- ky)
REVISED: 10/77LV 0
MEMO TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
0
'EaI
FLE
DATE:
Building Division
Community Development Department
Engineering Division
Public Works Department
�24 (MITO C10000 "GOLOM1.3 Lz�varsfl
After review of the subject building permit application, we have
the following comments:
_(l) Coordination of the location of any structure with respect.to
utilities, streets, property lines and driveway grades is the
responsibility of the contractor.
(2) The contractor is required to keep the abutting streets clean-
ed of dirt and debris caused by the construction.
(3) A "Right-of-I%Iav Construction Permit" is required, from the
Engineering Division of Public Works, for any work within
the Public Right -of -Way or public easement.
(4) Driveway slope not to.exceed 1.4%.
PW 5/77
6 619"'V L-4pa-D rM �MWMOK2
in, III Tom. 2 7J, KI
odd
AoI&AAL6
�TWJBLICWCOP�VJKS LD CAMR CKLIST
BUILDING P-EIRRMN-IT V .
e2l ONIT
ANE W.
(address),: (date)
0
Street.Right-of-way Existing
REQD Man
Z
Access Easements Existi-Tig
H------------
Utility Easement Existing__AkD_.jjV
REQD r A,.
W.
Lot Per Subdivision Plat
=own Assessor Map__X�_
Site Plan Checked for Accura
Z
Underground Wiring Reqd..
F4
U
Check Accuracy of Legal Description "
Z
Review b Y_
Date*
Existing Water Main Size sr..
Water Main Required
Service Line Required
Hydrant Size Existing
P4
Hydrant Reqd Per Fire -Code
Size
Detector Check Meter Reqd. 140
Cross Connection Inspection Vfp,
Aa V-P e-laec ZVaO
Fire Department Comments
Water Meter Charge Reqd qM 4"
WIS
Review b.Y
D a t e _20/ f-.; 12-8
Septic Tank Design Approved
Date
Septic Tank Permit Reqd;
Permit No.
Sanitary Sewer Availability
Proi . L_ t P 1512-
braqing No. i5
File No. -
Side Sewer Availability, v�&_j 8c>'1_-L
Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee Reqd.
Review by.
D a t e Sh-C /79
AqK.&
Open Ditch Existing.
jZeqd.
Culvert Reqd.
—Size
c4
Catch Basin Reqd.
-Indicate on Site Plan
0
Shoulder drainage maintain collection an swale open runoff
ole req
Indicate on Site Plan
Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked
Review by
Date,
Revised: 1vlO-1977
Page 2
Street Paving Reqd.
Curb and Gutter Reqd.
Sidewalk Reqd.
Curb Cutf for Driveway Reqd.
P4 Right -of -Way Construction Permit Reqd..
Bond Reqd. for Public Improvements
Street Name Sign Reqd.
Other Signing Reqd.
Pre Permit Site Inspection made on--
z
0
H BY: SMqER
WATER K
P-1
z STREET
ENGINEERING
'4 Special Requirements listed in memo to Comamity Development Department,
Building Division
BY Date
$5 Nj
o All items.filled,in an Building Permit Application
P� BY IS " Date
Drawings Stairped- and Notations, Made
P4
BY Date
Approved by Public Works Department
Kevised6 iv 10-1977
RULE :10
DATE:
INSPECTION RECORD
CITY OF EDMONDS, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PROJECT:
Cc�- /Do
8-0 -rq V-,"
—D -ka L-p
1/781v
,Y:
-;z /
z
BUILDING DEPARTMENIF
Applicant Fill
z�_NE
PERMIT APPLICATION
Inside Heavy Lines
JOB M L
ADDRESS C;2 W jest
so �V.
NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS)
LEGAL LOT
YES NO
LOTAREA SUBDIVISION NO.
1ASOCR MAP
W
z
M7LING AD S,
M �R MR
3:
0
STREET R/W
EXISTING STREET R/W .30. FT. DEFICIENCY THIS PROPERTY
HONE NUMBER
COMP. PLAN ST. R/W 40 FT. V*pjZ$ FT.
I-
NAME
REMARKS
13
z
m
U
W
I-
i
ADDRESS
/,s - 3S /(0 —/1
/of-
HECKED BY
Ic
U
lur
I
CITY
HONE NUMBER
STREET AND/OR UTILITY WORK
REQ'D.
R/W PERMIT REQUIRED
z
YES ONO
ip YES 0 NO
III
NAME
UNDERGROUND
C110,,Ae1,#1 (?)'/0
WIRING R EQ'D. V YES 0 NO
OC
0
I-
ADDRESS
V0,09-1
- -
TYPE CONNECTION S IVERI
EYE
SANITARY SEINER
ED BY
U
<
A A60 k
ONO
( US
CITY
TELEPHONE NUMBER
SEPTIC SYSTEM
YES
PERMIT NUMBER
Z
0
-4�B
APPV'D BY CITY ENG.
VNO
u
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
CITY LICENSE NUMBER
REMARKS
Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four CTpi`es)
METER SIZE
I ING SUPPLY SIZE
W
REMARKS
E ;2zwULA 7_0 C
z
0
P
xv /00
OeL C/ry
IL
SIGN AREA
SNV. REVIEW
ADB NO.
u
ALLOWED PROPOSED
COMPLETE EXEMPT
q-,7sl
In
W
REMARKS
13
III
___rNNING
VARIANCE OR CU
REVIEW BY
DATE
YARDS ILOT
COVE AGE
R
GAS
NEW RESIDENTIAL LINE
FRONT SIDE REAR
—Y
FIRE ZONE 7T
PE OF CONSTRUCTION
NON-RESIDENTIAL SIGN
111:1
I CODE
1 / AIP- 1�73
HEIGHT
D ADD
91
_T_
F'�DEMOLISH RETAINING
11 WALL
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
REQUIRED
AREA
I
OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT
ALTER EXCAVATE FENCE
OR FILL I—x FT)
D 11
0 YES N 0 17676
#
IGROUP LOAD
—
PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY
REPAIR PRE -MOVE swim
El INSP. EIPOOL
OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX
SHOULD BE CODED 31.04.
NU M BER OF STORIES
94UMBER OF
REMARKS
DWELLING
UNITS
z
NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE
W
VALUATION
FEE
F—=
z
PROPOSED USE
2
PLAN CHECK
NO.
I-
z
I-
ILYA
W
IL
PLOT PLAN (INDICATE BUILDING ETBACKS,
Aeuvviko 9TREeTss)
BUILDING
364 R"o
00
�96
-
U
1
0
PLUMBING
�0,
j
W
0
>
W
HEAT& GAS LINE
FENCE
SIGN
RETAINING WALL
U
SWIMMING POOL
STREET FILE
laI Reid, Middleton & Associates,, Inc.
w ENGINEERS * SURVEYORS * PLANNERS
324 Main Street, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206)775-3434
Mr. Robert Brokaw
Commercial Bank
P.O. Box 25607
Seattle, Washington 98125
Dear Mr. Brokaw:
December 20., 1979
File No. 70324
DEC Z10
IQ
Pit. Ut eublic W 79
'Woaa
Golden Leaves Condomini-um S11----
W Yre -r R-e Vte-n-C-i -on- 'Sy-s-t-eN�-'
On December 18, 1979, we received a telephone call from Mr. Bill
Nims of the City of Edmonds Engineering Department alerting us to a
drainage problem at the Golden Leaves Condominium in Edmonds. Mr. Nims
requested us to meet him at the site to review the situation. Mr. Larry
Schwantes from our firm was sent out and he reports the following conditions:
Catch basin No. 1, as noted on the approved design plan, was not
properly grouted or sealed in accordance with the applicable s * tandards, which
allowed the water to flow out of its side to a depth of approximately 3 feet.
As this was in a fill area ' the water caused a washing out of the fill em-
bankment and on the property which lies to the east. The effect of the
missing sea] was th6t:the retention system never filled properly to retain
its designed 10-year storm water volume. In addition, the parking lot at the
southeast corner was extended farther to the east than the plan indicates.
The curb along the east side appears to not be at this design slope.
We bring this to your attention, as there no doubt will have to be some
type of correction-wark-on this system. We -have some interest in -this, as
we did prepare the design drawi ngs and secured the approved by the City of
Edmonds of the design itself. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, we were never
requested toassist the contractor or.provide inspection services which would
have allowed the contractor to correct these deficiences at that time.
Very truly yours,
R;EIDJ, DDLETON & ASSOCIATES, INC..
L by 4F. Middleton
LFM:sc
cc: Bill Nims1j
STREET FILE.
MEMO TO: Art Housler, Director
Finance Department
FROM: Leif R. Larson
Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: REIMBURSEMENT OF -STREET CUT SECURITY DEPOSIT
ORDINANCE #1935
R/W CONSTR. PERMIT NO.: 78-180
DATE ISSUED: --7-27-78
LOCATION OF WORK: 2 1615 9-0-thAve. W,1
SECURITY DEPOSIT AMOUNT: 72.-)C -
RECEIPT NO. &.DATE: 3738 f,-2-78
COMPLETION DT. OF REPAIR: I I- __
Please prepare a Treasurer's Check in the amount of $ None
made payable to�the following:
The balance of the deposit in the amount of $ 72.00 i S
to remain in Street Division Revenue Fund.111-000-000--7E-9-7.1-0.
-,719
X
17" e
StTeVIE sup�
Admi Dt.
7/31/78
Ll- 14 L L I � I 1 116 0 1 V
APPLICATH&OR R1G1-J*F-0E-.',Yky MPI-ST PLIC&I PF.Rf'11T
T If IS P E' RM IT MUST BE AV A I L A 13LE - AT T 11; JOB S LTF FOR I NS PEC r 01M 1) U K P OSE.s
Applicant to Complete Parts A and B �c v e E
--------- - -
A. Permit to be issued to
For Work at :(address or vic1nity)
Type of ��,Iork to be done:
(attach drawing when applicable)
Time Required Start: 71a7 Finish:
7
Owner:
Name,,
Mai,ling Address
.City State Zip Telephone Number
Contractor:
Name �State License
NUmbe r
Hailing Address
L 1) �. i %) ') *) P - / �; S
L %2
r
Citv
S t a t e 7ip Te I e I
NO �-!ORK TO BEIGIN PRIOR TO PERM111 I.SSUANCE
B.") INDEININIITY: Applicant understnnds and by his Sig . nature to this appi.iciti.oll, -Igr,-,Ts
)to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any i '
injuries, da-mages, or c,l.-lims oF
,111v
,kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or un[oreseen, that may b.e made a�,,-Iinst
6,he applicant or the City of -Edmonds, or any of its departments or empl.o
yees
including or not limited
to the defense of any leFal proceedinp-s incIuding defense
icosts, court -costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, tile contractor is responsible for workf;iansihip and
materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance
of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Depo.sit (estimate(] restoration fee) wi.11 he ile.l(I until.
the final. street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be
processed for issuance to tile applicant.
Work is subject to inspection a' I / Cit%
J nd restoration in accord;ince ��,jn " Code. A
24-hour, notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775- . 2525, ext. 220.-
I understand that this permit must be.available it the job site for inspection
purposes at all times.
Signature:
Ownler or Agent
a TU 13L COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY:
Date Issued:--,�--e' P e r m i t
Security Bond: AJ , , -'J- - / -7,
Time Authorized: 5
APPROVED
N ��S'o
o. : -
Date:
D a t e :,)-- '_7 ;�
i n -7 7 1- (D,,.; _i) r, -7 0 *1 - ( - - , . " - - I )
C-"110�4 /��
4/1
0
:i�, e /(�,
JAME� H. REID
0710 F. MIDDLETON
C. WAYNE JONES
LLOYD H. NELSON
ST ET FILE
& A44064�, #7
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
324 Main Street 0 Edmonds, Washington 98020 0 (2061 775-3434
February 27, 1978
File No. 7032
STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
pr:r!:1k1FD
FOR
MAR 9 1978
ROBERT BROKAW
Puuiit; woulAs U011
FOR
PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM BUILDING
Site Information
Area = 1.18 acres
Topography 2%* easterly on west half, 10%t easterly on east half of
property. Average 5%±
Site Condition - Existing residential lot
Undeveloped Site
Time to Concentration = Tc - L/(V)(60) + 10 min = 2541/0-5)(60) + 10 min
= 12.8 min
Intensity - 1 1.47 in/,hr @ 10 yr. frequency (Seattle Curve)
Runoff coefficient = 0.40 for single family residence areas
Q = ciA = (0.4)(1.47)(1.18) = 0.69 C.f.s.
Q Allowable = 0.69 c.f.s.
Developed Site
Runoff coefficient weighted:
Roof,ond concrete C @ 0.90 w/area = 0.38 acre
Asphalt -planter I s C @ 0.85 w/area = 0.37 acre*
'Lawn and C @ 0.2 w/area = 0.43 acre
Therefore prorating 11CII: (0-900-38) + (0.85)(0-37) +;(0.2)(6.43) 0.74
Over1and f164 vdlocity 2.5 ft/sed
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING 0 WATER SUPPLY WASTE TREATMENT SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERIN . G
'A IRPORT PLANNING & DESI-GN MARINAS PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDIES
February 27, 1978
File No. 7032
1
STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR ROBERT BROKAW FOR PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM BUILDING (Cont.)
Time to Concentration Tc = L/(V)(60) +5 mi.n = 254/(2-5)(60) + 5 = 6.7 min
Intensity m- 1 2.01 in/h�
Q developed - Qd = ciA = (0-74)(2.01)(1.18) = 1.76 c.f.s.
Tc i . cA Q
6.7
2.01
0.87 1.76
10
1.62
1.41
20
1.05
0.92
30
0.83
0.72
4o
o.68
0.59
50
0.59
0.52
60
0.53
o.46
See hydrograph for required storage.
Sizing Retention System
645 ft. 3 = storage required
Utilizing storage -
1211 pipe volume - 0.'7854 ft. 3/l.f.
811 pipe volume - 0.3491 ft.3/l.f.
3/410 minimum washed gravel loosely placed yields 30%'voids
Construct 120 1 f. 8" hb] Ical aluminum storm sewer 14 ga. vol . 41 .89 ft;3
Construct 92 I.f. 8" helical aiUminum storm sewer 14 qa. vol. 32.12 ft-3
Con-struct 98 I.f. 1211 perf-helical aluminum storm sewer 16 ga. vol. = 76.97 ft-3
Construct 41 x 81 x 98, long level bed w/3/4" min washed gravel w/12"
perforated pipe in bed vol./l.f. = 9.36 ft.3 excluding volume of
pipe. Total volume bed 917-71 ft-3
Construct 15 I.f. 8" helical aluminum storm sewer 16 ga. vol. = 5.24 ft.3
Tota.] volume of storage subsurface, exclud'ing catch basins = 1073-93 ft-3
When the pipe..and gravel bed systems are full at elevation 89-70, the
3
volume of storage in catch basins equals:, CB #5 8.79 ft.
CB #4 11.10 ft 3
CB #3 2.1 ft'3
CB #2 14.34 ft.3
3
CB #1 17.10 ft.
Total 53.43 ft.3
2
February 27, 1978
File No. 7032
STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR ROBERT BROKAW FOR PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM BUILDING (Cont.)
3
Total volume- subsurface— 1127-36 ft.3. 645 ft. required
Therefore 482-36 ft3 excess storage is available at Elevation 89-70.
If the 10 year storm is exceeded in addition to the 482.36 ft3 at,elevation
.89-70, an additional 556.5 ft.3 Is available by ponding in the parking areas
to a maximum elevation of 90.65, at which time water will be sheet flowing off
the site.
We estimate that percolation in this soil will occur and that the rate will vary
from 5 - 10 min/hr or 1.6 gal. to 2.2 gal. per sq. ft. per day. Using the surface
area of jhe bottom of the gravel bed only and 2 gal/ft.1/day - 15.68 gallons -or
209.5 ft of water will flow vertical out of the bed. Lateral movement of water
is also expected but will vary based on the duration and height of water in the
bed area. If the bed area was full we estimate that an additional 226.7 ft3 could
possibly flow from the bed area in a day.
Total percolation'equals 436.2 ft.3/day-
- 3 -
aft, t: ke 114
J i.
0
I X4
tj
SA
OR
I
SIN
Ila
kk
ILE
DATE:
MEMO TO: Building Division
Community Development Department
FROM;, Engineering Division
Public Works Department
SUBJECT: 2. (o 15 1 Ell (A317 do
After review of the subject building permit application, we have
the following comments:
FZ,.- 3
� r-==W4M=
A
P
;ZECEIVED
iol-AkET FILE
PqJECT NAME D E 0 2 3 1977
DATE SUBMITTED city of Edmonds
96FAFAUQ'tV pnUgki. Dent.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
In order to meet the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971,
the responsible official must make a declaration of environmental impact as.early
as possible in the process of evaluating a project.
The information in this form ,-J11 'be used to determine whether it will be necess-
ary to require an environmental imoact statement. Pf an'impact statement is
not required, a Statement of 'Negative Declarati—on will be placed in the file.
If an impact statement is required, a draft statement'must be filed with this
office, public notice given and a revievi period of 30 days allowed. The final
statement and comments mus't be filed with the Department of Ecology, Office of
the Governor and tl�ie Ecological Commission.
The Edmonds Planning Staff will assist you in any way we can in accumulating
this information and we would appreciateyour cooperation.
1. Land:
Area in acres
Soils type _-�)AdbLj Limitations
I
Description of to:.po'graphy (% slope) (-Z-
Q P�0 441-D t W I -r- L-+
_t>ln L-0 3 k,.� A-043
Grading: estimated cubic yds. — IC)CD c-v.yD3_ NOTE: If grading or filling
wilT exceed 500 cubic Yards
Filling: estimated cubic yds. C3 ox�_ a grading and filling -plan
2. Water: must be submitted with the
appl icati on.
Stream - estimated flow (cubic feet per second)
Will stream be altered? 0 )A -
To what degree? h:�.
Impact on storm drainage
'_ b le3 16-0
(i n creas e i n run -o f 11) 1 ri c t>j , —% !j,
F= TeT4 T I
4-0 ,
Estimated area Ao be paved -Z- 3 -
Estimated area in open space
Shorelines: within 200 ft.
Adjacent to'shorelines zone
I rL--.7yxlx .
of Mean Iii er High Water
Environmental Assessment, page 2
3. Vegetation:
Type of trees % to be removed o
Minimum diameter of trees to remain C�D
Ground cover % to be removed
Proposed landscaping, if any A=
.4. Existing Land Use within 300 ft. radius of proposed development:.
Vacant
Single
Family
Mu I ti -
Family
Comm.
Other
North
Y
South
X
East
West
5. Ci rcul ati on:
Estimated increase in auto trips daily
Estimated demand for public transportation
Degree of change on adjacent streets
6. Area of impact:
neighborhood
ci.ty-wide
regional
7. Effect. on air quality:
8. thanges in noise generation:
0 C'-'J ��-
t-) C-�' (') kE�-
So
2
3
4
61
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
.15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
3-7
38
39
40
.41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
0 11_�
DATE:
A $25 fee -'will be collected by the City of Edmonds for analysis
of the.-Envirohmental Checklist and the preparation of a Threshold
'----Dete�mination. No fee will be charged for proposals which would
be categorica.11y exempt if they were not located in an environ-
mentally sensitive area.
ENVIRONIIIENTAL CHECKLIST FOPM
1. BACKGROUND
143111C of Proponent
2. Address and Phone Fai.i �er o�f_ Proponenc-
?. 0, B W --- 776'-3-
_� ',6-�V270A)-W, CVILIZ�2 -�4 7
3. Dace Ch ccV.I.—ISFSubmitted C_ z I CYT
4. Agency Requiring Checklisu
—C. rlll)'i Y e Lq i;
5. Hame of Proposal if applicable:
V,q R? # VCZ / C rj - — /_4 -;1.6 v, I j a A91 /VO A/'I "h
6. Nay.urc and brieL DescripLion of tITO —Prollosal (ii1cluz r-k
inp, buL not limited to its site, ),,encral dcsi,-_,,n ele-
ments, and other factors that will give on accurate
1 .1 4 f 4
.. 7.
11
9
un(CrSLan ng o 6s scope qn naLUrC) : -
R 67V OW
�)Jr �, /1-1 rr Zfry� ; ! / _!S . Y -, e , , zr " - — -7-14 j J e474 f.c.0 �.I- / 1, _X-e�
er 40a i& A -J, -.0 0 A, Ye) 0 S!�R4r r -rz� 4MO-W - z4f, ce., I Y -IL
Locacion of Proposal (ciescribe tht: physical set:cing O?f
the proposal, as well as the exLent o�- Lhe land area
affected by nny environwiencal impacts, including any
other inforniacion needed to give an accura�_, underSLand-
in of Lhe environmental setting of the propos 1):
c.1 ZiB440 5UJ z .410.3 011y /We
C_at2i ) S 11, .
ce't"Jilli b
hsti.iivrted Dirc 1-br Completion of Linc III -op Se � Action:
�il T"_,wL-7-,_ 197Pj .
Li L ot Licenses o-,:, GoveriimenU Aporovals
Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local --
including rezones)
/_C)C,4tL_.
-31-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
�21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
14
35
.36
37
38
39
AO
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
.66
10. Do you have any plans for future addicions. expansion,
or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain:
11. Do you know of any p by others which may affect
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain:
12. Attach any other application Eorm. that has been com_
pleced regarding the proposal; if none has been com-
pleted, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such applica,tion form:
II. ENVIROZZ-1,11H.14TAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers
are
required)
Yes
Maybe No
(1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements. com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
rc-r AP-W � ';�
(c) Change in topography'o*r groun
surface relief features?
V;:F11n: S.-.4 -Qk-C9G7
(d) The destruction, covering or
modification of'any unique geologic
or physical features?
(e) Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
(f) - Changt�s in deposition or ero-
sion of beach sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition*or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed'oC the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:.
(2) Air. W1711 the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable
odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
chani,,c in c' Latate, either locally
or regionally?
Explanation:
.- -32-
2.
3
4
5
61
7 1
8.
9
10
12 i
13
14
151
161
17
181
11 1
20
21
22
231
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ji
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
.55
56
57
58
YdOMaybe No
(3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in -currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh'
waters?.
(b) Changes in absorp.tion rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and�
amount of surface water runoff?
Rut) 01=1F Arj > RATt—:-_
(c) Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of sur-
face water in any water body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alceracion-of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction
or rate of flow of ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or throu)Ih interception of an
.aquifer by cuts orexcavations?
(h) Deterioration in ground water
quality, eit,hcr through direct in-
jection, *or through the seepage of
leachaLe, phosphates, detergents,
waterbortic virus or bacteria, or
other substances.-inco the ground
waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of
.water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Explanation:
(4) Flora. Will the propo*sal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of
speci.es,.or numbers of any species
of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, iiiicroflora and
aquatic plants)?
P� V�.�-Uj -tjtL.'-U<. klt<t:� OA--rwu;-
A, j I r
(b) Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of flora?
-33-
11
21
3 1
4
5
61
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
I'll39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
so
51
52
53
54
55
Yes No
(c) Introduction of new species
of flora into an area, or in a
barrier to the norinal replenish-
ment of existing species?
Fer;_, LN.0r>scA.P,�- 'P—AJ (
4'�
M Reduction in acreage of any 4�7X 144 e�
agricultural crop?
Explanation:
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
Of FaUtla (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
Eish, beTlt1ljC organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered.
species of fauna?
(c) InLroduction of new species
of launa into.an area, or result
in a barrier to tile migration or
movement of fauna?
(d) Del-erioration to eyisting
f ish or wildlife habitat?
Explanation:
(6) N'o i s-e . Will the proposal increase
LIXISEill)" noise levels?
ExplanatI.O:n: 9.61, S ]'I I'L4., tt
(7) L�Lht and GLare. Will the pro-
POSTF-(�T-6-ju—c-e n-ew light or
j, lare ?
Explanation:
(8) Land Us'o. U'ill the propos".11
F e!; �-77�—Ln tile alteration of the
present or planned land use of an
area?
Explanation-
-34-
Yes Maybe No
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
'43
44
45
46
47
48
49
.50
51.
52
53
54
.55
56
57
58
(9) Natural Resources. will the pro-
P0S-'r_r_e__SuTL —in.
(a) Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
M Depletion of any nonrene wable
natural resource?
Explanation:
(10) Risk Of UPset. Does tile proposal
1�nvO v`e�T —risk of an explosion or
the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not: limited
to,
Oil, Pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in tile Cverit of an acci-
dent or upset conditions? I I
Explanation:
— . - _�C
- - _Y_
(11). PopiliaLion. W[11 tile proposal
-t7(r _tT'c
10c,"Cion, distribuiLion,
density,
or growth rate of tile
hunian Population of an area?
Explanation:
�_4
1 t- t AA &L-rz
A A U.
(12) o u s_j n Will tile proposal affect
exi.stinp
, 110u!�imnw, availabilfty, or
create a demand for additional
housing?
Explanati.on: A,\ A�
(13) T ra tn L i Oil/ Circulat ion, Will.
P r 0 p -S- -U 1 -t — - -
t 1n:
(a). Generation of additional
vehicular movement?
M Effects on existing parking
facilities,
or demand for new
parking?
(0"5 S'
I
(c) 11"Pact upon existing trans-
portaLion systeqs?
I-JCOASYNSG�
(d) AlteraLiOns to 'present
.�Pattcrns of circulation 017 Move -
merit Of People and/or goods?
(e) AlLerations to waterborric,
rail or air traffic?
-35-
4
1 . .
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2-8
29
..30
31
32
33
,34
35
36
37-i
38
39
40
41
42
43
.44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
Yes Maybe No
(f) Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
Explanation:
(14) PubLLc Services. Will the pro-
-Po;,-,-jj—T-j�Tve —,jr, effect upon, or
result in a need for now govern-
mental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?.
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational
facilities?
(e) mainrenance of'public facili-
ties, including roads?
(f) Other,governmental services?
72�
Explanation:
(15) L
Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of subsLantial amounts of.
fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require uhe develop-
mcnL of new SOUrCCS ofenergy?
Explanation:
(16) U t i I i t i e s - Will the PrOPOs�ll
rZ'S__kTiE:_1n a need foi- r,,.'. !zvstems,
or alterations to the following
utilities :
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) CorrullUnications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e),. Storm water drainage?
(f) ' Solid waste and disposal?
E,xplanation:
y
-36-*
-36-*
2
3
14
5
7
Z
1
2
3
4
5
2
2
2
2
2,
2.
21
2�
2�
2S
3C
31
32
13
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
.41
42
It 3
44
45
46
47
481
149
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
581
59
_Le
(17) Hul C �'i '71. Will tile pro
Liu A lic posal
res ill Me creation of any
health hazard or Potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
(18), Aesthetics. I Will the proposal
resuft —in the obstruction of any
scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal re-
sult ill the creation of an
aestbetically offensive site open
to public view?
Explanation:
(19) Recreation - Will the Proposal
Fj_Su17FTrT_an imPact upon the
quality 01: (ILIallLity Of e
'XiSting
recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
(20) tj
Ie
of
a significalit archeological or his-
torical site, structure, object
or building?
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
4
_X_
the undersigned, state that to tile best Of my knowledge
tile above information is true and col,.1plece.
that the lead apenc It is understood
ficance that it 'mij'Y may wit'hdraTw any declaration olf non-signi-
-'llt issue ill reliance upon thi 11 c k I i:S c:
Should there be any mi s representa Lion or s c C
on my part. _;ji c k of ful.1 disclosure
Proponent:.
WAC 1.97-1.0-370 WITHDRAI-,'AL OF AF1'
IRMATIVE TJll)1-,,SllCfrD
uiy
tioll Of sip'lli If -cr
mo af the entry of a declara-
ficance, the Proponen
so that, ill Llie jU(l t Modifies Che j)ropocal
FMC111 L Of tile lead agericy a I I L irlli f i call c
adverse envil-onriental il-I'PacLs r0sulting cll��refrom are Climin-
aced' tile decl';'r�1L"oll of Si8l'ificance ��llall b. wjU
alld a declaratioll o'E 11011-F, " C, - hdra�-.n
I ca d -11, i&llificazice entered instead. The
' 'ellcy sh�ill also revise the re,-.j,:Lcr,
Public informati.o.n center'accordi,-Si. — -'It its SLPA
Poll"L of a Pl:0P0SQlJs a pri.va If tile pro -
shall 'lot 'be coll�,;i.del.ed 111odj_fic!ce aPP]..ca!Ic, thc proposal
11 until .111 license, aPPIA.ca-
tions for tile PrOPOsal are revised to reftect
the modification.
-37-
a FILE.
1-74 (1Z
DATE c' I PIP11IT ADDRFSS
LFCAL DEc.CPIPTTnT'l
BUILDING PERMIT RFVIEW - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CHFCK LIST
Instruction:
Check Accuracy of Lenal Description
Check Anainst Assessor's flat) for Le -al Subdivision
Does it conform to City APProved Subdivision?
Reviewer's
Initials
2.
3.
6.
7.
9.
10.
12.
20.
21.
22.
This lot included in Suhdivision/�kl.at No..
Site Inspection made on:
Uhat are oround water and
Site Oraioanr Checked? —
Storm Sevier Availabilitv:
Roadside Ditch
-S (1-:T L
il conditinns?-��PAI�
N-- P,
.--Of Nin. 110. Projec
r,rading & Final Contours:
Septic Tank System Desinn AnProved: 7L\I-
SanitarY Sevier Availahilit.v-y Sht. of f)t./O. No. Project
Side set -ter availabilit V:
Janitar�y Sevier Connection Fees? :::�l OR Uk 0
V,
Uater Mains & Fire H.vdrants (Indicate Size flain)_4
Check Fire Dept.'s Comments —
Sidewalks: (!4,tP
,,,�inspjpjction sho-,-is conditions of sidevialks as follows)
C u rh s Ct rh Cuts/Priviiways (Check. driveviovs for safety, location,
(Irade and width):-Z:AJUVE�� I
(Indernround I!irinn:- Street Liqhts:
Street Piolit-of-way A Rldq. setbacks:2--::i h t. of ()fficial Street t'ap.
Existinn Utility Faserents?
Access Easepinnts:
Site Plan checked for accuracy?
.Special Requirements listed in flemo to Rldq. Dept.
Commercial & Apt. Rnnuirements form completed?
Drawings stamped F, notations riade?
All Items filled in on P.ldg. Perilit Application?
Bonds posted for site v.,ork?
Z_ 2 3. Pipht-of-way Invasion Permit rCQUired?
COMMENTS: wcnw D-( Pi int
Rev. 7/1/76
16 is
q
'PJ. f) C-7 :�75�
DATE: _
--- Al '
MEMO TO: Harry !,.Ihitcutt
Building Official
FROM: Richard H. Allen
. Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: AEU A L-f��-t 2-16 IG M7F W
After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following
comments:
'A
M-1511 Etas
61
big
IN Q 1071 MRS-1 -0
rifffl"Aj &4%
L4K4 W-Y
FEW.
C, ITS ff N Ar" rA a �Vlf "Al-i U. M LA I
W-1
FILE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
March 17, 1976
.Lzi (�,e 4
CU- 13- 76 NORSOL COMPANY (Con"t)
Tile applicant, i"Ir. HLISland manufactures crab pots and needs t:iis buildingto.
continLI-2d.his nianufacturing. He had a conditional use for his activity in
another location (�36 Admiral Way), but needs to move to a new location and
thus needs a new conditional use.permit. This Lemporary building was approved
by tile Amenities Design Board Subject to its rerloval after 18 months..
Miss Criarleson stated that she recorn.mends approval of CU-13-76 because this
type of activity is definitely a shoreline related use and thus needs to locate
near the waterfront. It will not be detrimental to neighboring property owners,
if the area is �ept clean, no excessive smoke, noise or vibrations, occur, and
if it -is removed kqithiij 18 months. The p0lic portion of the hearing was.,then
opened, ho�,iever no, one wished to coniment and the public portion'was closed.
DIN McQUADE MOVED, SECONDED BY BILL LERAAS, 'rilAT CU-13-76 BE APPROVED ON THE
GROUNDS THAT rr DOES CONFORM TO THE CRITERIA, THAT IT JS WATERFRONT ORIENTED,
THAT THERE HAVE BEEN 1,10 COMPLAINTS IN'. REGARDS TO THE APPLICNIT'S OPERATION AT
HIS PRESENT LOCATION, A1,1D THAT IT IS NOT DETRIl"'ENTAL TO THE HEALTH, 'WELFARE
OR WELL BEING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. MOTION CARRIED.
CU-16-76 CLOUDY & BIRITTON, INC. Conditional Use Permit for Industrial Refrigeration
Shop at 138 Railroad Avenue (Merry 'riiler Building) (C!,J)
Noelle Charleson stated that this application was for ajight manufacturing
business in a N Z011e, proposing to locate in 'die Ilerry Tiller Building.
Mr. Cloud nd thus has to locate
y man�ufactur ' es refrigeration units for ships a
on the waterfront to provide this service. lie has explained that t1lere are
no toxic materials used in his business and vcry little noise in t1he vielding
.of the refrigerators. Ile has indicated that occasionally a,large truck will
P Iled to the s ite to transport refrigerators but that this would not . occur
o te The Assi s tan t PI anner reconiiended approval of CU- 16-76 because i t i s
a use that needs to, locate in a shoreline area, as long as it does -not violate
the perWmance standards of Section 12.14.050.-, and as long as truck deliveries
or pick -ups -do not cause a problem in the area.. The public portion of the *
hearing was then opened however no one. wished to corriment and the public portion
was closed.
Paul Roy asked how niany employees would be employed by this con ' Dany and �4r.
Cloudy responded that they have 7-10 permanent employees, with as many as 15
at peak busi.ness times. Out in the field, the - v may have as.many as 20-25.
!4r. Roy was concerned about parking being a probleni. Mr. Cloudy indicated
that there was pl.enty of parking in the neighboring area. PAUL ROY tIOVED,
SECONDED BY AL KNOKE*THAT CU-16-76 BE APPROVED AS T14E BUILDING HAS BEEN USED
FOR HAi4UFACTURIING BEFORE AND -THAT THIS IS A COilPATIBLE USE, XID TliAT IT IS
NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, MORALS OR WELFARE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. mOT I ON
CARRIED.
GRACE ASSEMBLY OF GOVx-_'14PL�E_3AR_RANCIj Conditional Use Permit-f'or da'
y care
preschool - kinderga?��and afte?7—school programs at 21615 - 80th Avenue West
(RML)
Noelle Char-leson stated that. the applicant is the fla.ple Bar Ra'nch,* a corporation
owned by the Grace Assembly of God Church and that it is to operate a day care
center at 21615 - 80tli West in an RM.zone. She then related the history of
the case.
On December 17, 1975 The Maple Bar Ranch was denied a conditional use permit
(File No. CU-46-75) by the Ednionds Board of Adjustment because the Board felt.
that the Maple Bar Ranch (as it was.operating at that time and according to the
EDIONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
March 17, 1976
Paqe 5
CU-14-76 MAPLE BAIR RANCH (Con't)
statement of operating conditions filed with the applic I tion) di d endan.gPr.
the public health, riorals and general* wel fare of the community and that it
would be injurious and detrimental to the neighboring propeirty owners.
VV
Oil Fp-bruary 17, 1976 another application for a conditional use permit for a
day care center located at tile same address (21615-80th Uest) was fil,cd by
'lapl P
Bat, Ranch to be heard at the 1arch meeting of the Board, of -Adjustme.nt.
John Uallace, City Attornev, has established that a ne', I ppl-ication for a
conditional use permit at Hiaplp Bar may be made (by Naple Bar) and heard by
the Board if Hapl-e Bar Ranch subi-flts an application which sets forth the re-
straints and other conditions that they are willing to im.pose upon themselves
in order to directly.meet the problems that their operation causes in the
particular neighborhood.
The Maple Bar Ranch contends that this new application (Fil . P No. CU-14-76)
it different from the last one (File No.- CU-46-75) in the following instances:
1) they are pre -Pared to show new evidence of the need for, a day care faci.li - ty
and tile guality of i-.he service they perform (they have submitted numerous letters
with thei-r 6pplica,tion to this effect); 2) they agree to build a fence around
thewhole property of material and hei,ght specifications set by tile Board;
3) they'agree never to let th-e children outside before 8:00 a.m ;. 4) they wi I I
ens ure , that no amplified speak-ers of any kind are used; 5) they will 'instruct
tile staff to better supervise the children on tile playground to control ex-
cessive noise; 6) they will work on the parking and traffic nroblem to make
sure it does not bother tile neighbors; 7) they agree never to expand to more
than 100 children serviced by Haple Bar. Iis.s Charleson stated that tlaple
Bar have not agreed to 1) change the hours of operationi oi- 2) reduce the
number of chil.dren.
Miss Ch arleson state,d that the major complaints raised at the December hearing
were: 1) parking and traffic probleris;' 2) noise from Oildren playing' outside
from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.; 3) damage to parts of the fence around the property;
and 4) the size of the operation was' too large and out of scale with tile neigh-
borhood - in tile sense that there are too many children there.
With. tile use of slides, iliss Charles*on shol,,ied the zoning of -the propertv and
abutting,property. She also indicated -that the property was acquired from
William Barr in July, 1974 and that the Ila ' ole Bar Ranch has been in existence
since.1962. She stated that the problem has arisen because Ilaple Bar's activ-
ities and tile number of chil.dren have expanded since its inception in, 1962.
Mis.s Charleson then distributed an analysis of the. traffic on 80th, Avenue Iles�t
prepared by tile Ci.ty. of Edmonds Engineering Department which states that the
peak traffic. -volume of 90 cars bet-ieen 6. a.m. and '9 a.m. does not adversely
impact the to-tal voTume-of traffic on 84th. She indicated that it represents
only 11% of the total 24 hour volume. However, she also indicated that the
Engineering Department does recommend a revised circulation system into and
out of llap�e Bar Ranch to alleviate any congestion on 80th. She. then showed
slides signifying these recommendations.
!liss Charleson stated that the noise problem is definiL"ely..a function of the
number of children, the size of 'the open space a'round therl-whether inside or
outside and how well supervised they are., She indicated that with proper.super-
vision and substantial buffuin thmtheplantirla of trees and shrubs and the
rearranging V some of the p ayge%qq,uilp . ent will b� compatible with the neigh-
borhood.
EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJusTMENT
March 17, 1976
PaQe 6
CU- 14-76 MAPLE BAR RANCH (Con' t)
The ap - pl i can t, Pastor David 'Westerfield stated tile- need for day . care centers
in this economic time of society. He indicated that :Iaple Bar does not intend
to double the si7e or op*ratp seven days a week.' Their' plans are for improve-
ment of tile facility only. He said that there has not been a traffic -or noise
problem. The Richardson residence, 21610-81st �elest, 0110 block viest of�the
M,pple Bar Ranch, indicated to Pastor WestLWield that thfy have had no noise
problem fk.,om thle dav care. It was indicat,2d that in convc'lrsatio;l ai�tlh tile
Murdock family', 217064130th lilest, across the street From the facility, that
11'rs. I'lurdock favors tile day care operation and that V o reason she ;pposed
it at the last hearing was because of* the informationlshe had received from
other sources.
Pastor. Nesterfield stated ' that the children are kept i nside tile day*caro center"
until 8 a.m. At 9 a.m. about 22 children are takOn to their classroom at Grace
-Assembl.v and the school age children are sent to Chas�� Like Elcmentary School.
This leaves about 50 children, 4 vears of age and vounger at the ranch, who
attend preschool classes until they have a brief recess about 11:45 a'.m. A rter
lunch they are put down for r , s a'
nap long with 0e kindergarten. children viho have
PetUrned from school. In good weather the ciiildren are allowed ouLside a little
after 3 until about 3:20 p.m. The school aQP Childretl, upon returning from
Chase Lake Elementary are given snacks and allowed outside at about 3:45. This
includes som6 20-25 'children. At approximately 4:30 the children begin le . aving
for home and by 5 o'clock less -than h,alf are left at the day care center.
Pastor. Wester . field then quoted. statements from several letters rece ived by
pa.rents of th*e Maple Bar Ranch supporting tile facility.
Citv Attorney John ' Wallace asked Pastor Westerfield if he can concur and operate
under tile conditions and recommendations imposed by tile Assistant Planner. Ile
indicatod that. ' the Plapl e Bar Ranch can and' 'wi I I try thei r hardes t but that * they
would need 6 niont:is or so to complete some of the restrictions involved.
Mr. William Barr stated that the Maple Bar Ranch is licensod for 70 children '
i.n day care and that the state does not license preschool and after school fac . il-
ities. lie indicated tha't.the.ila.ple Bar Ranch does comply with state. recommendations.
Mr. 7entner, a member of -the Grace Assemblv commented on the noise iss . ue, and
stated that noise controT would have to be imposed on every school in the. city.
Don McQuade as-ked tile Pastor if these conditions as set forth in the planner's
recommendations were acceptable., Tile Pastor rn-s*ponded that they could comply
with the itenis' that were mentioned except perhaps the limit of 70 children.
Jerry Sandi.no, a Board 'lember at the'Grace Assembly indicat ' ed that the*'laDle
Bar Ranch is run by state regulations aild that the
y conforai to the conditions
laycd down by -the state. He then revievied the conditions as stated earlier by
Miss Charleson. Ile. thein cornparl-d the :1aple Bar 'Ranch wi th various schools. in
the City of Edmonds. Attorney Wallace stated that schools.are permi . tted in the
city -without a conditional use permit. Therefore in this case' '(in Ulls case
the Board of Adjustment) has the right to impose certain requirements and con-
ditions. The public portion Of the hearing .ias then opened.
Sue Barnes, 20025 Nplewood 'Drive, indicated that she has been taking her child
to �Iaple Bar Ranch for 8 months.6nd has. never had any trouble wi , th parking or
traffic. She stated that itwas a great school and she would hate to see any-
thigg happen to it.
10
EDNMI)S b ARD OF ADJUSTHEINT
March 17, 19Y6
Pace 7
CU-14--76 MPLE BAR IIANCH (Con't)
Ed Spranger, .7916-216th asked the board to clarify tile confusion in his mind
as to what !,lap] e Bar -,.ias applying for, and whi-t is th-2 di f ference as to i.J,'Iat
they, are doing today. Attorney Wallace ex0lained that- there 1s court litiga-
ti oil ' pending and that. they can continue to oPerato until such tim2 as that
court decision is made, and t1lat �,laole Rar.is here tonight to see if they can
got a conditional use permit and not have to rely on the court deci0on some-
time :in April that may or may not put. them Out Of I)USillbSS. He also stated
0at this particular applicat';on s.hould be heard solely . oil its own merits and
should not relate back to tile previous application.
�lr. E. C. Renas, 21624-79t(l Avenue [lest, presented i lengthy discussion w.hich
stated his 1jelief that 'laple Bar ' Ranch has not suhmitted a new application, or
aily ne, 'v evidence, therefore tile Doard of*Adjustmant should -not 1,� !iearing this
issue this evening, but' that title matter should be r0solved in Supremp Court.
-Mr. Renas went.bick over tile histor.y of ne case and nresented documents which
contained tile folloviing: (1) Set of letters and previous applications, etc.;
(2) Pilot I
I os of 1964 of dhildren; (3) Co.pies of k-159; (4) Copies of'maps;
(5) 'lap from Building Department #670036 (now oil file in 130-111ding Department.
'lie stated tiiat he felt the.Board of Adjustment. ;ias been mislrd and referred
to t!ie Decembor, 1975 minutes. lie indicated that CU-14-76 was essentially
the same permit applied for in 1975.
Several persons in tile audience, including neighbors, teachers and Darents
.from tile '"laple Bar Panch voiced t'lieir views both P.�ains.t and fi'l sup'po'rt of
the application. After much discussion, Ue public portion of the hearing
was closed. Fol.lowing discussion :)cti,ieen the board Piei-,ibers and staff, Paul
roy reviel,:/ed the criteria for condi(iffllal use po),i-iits, �after ,-thic'l PAUL ROY
;1OVED, SECONDED BY Al- BAILEY THAT CU-14-76 BE DEi.111ED BECAUSE THE NOISE IS
EXCESSIVE AND MES NOT HEET THE REQUIRED CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIMS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONES. MOTION CARRIED.
The meet.ing was adjourned at 12:45 a.m. I . .
W 11D TO: Planning rcTmartment
P7M: Tdchard 11. Allen
Zkosistant WZ7 -,ngineer
RT
VF= -. Board of
Randi Vi
00
P V
arch 16, 1976
bment VmtiM of March 17, 1976 - f-%ple Bar
Traffic StA;dv
-raffic rxxmts taken ��� 1975:
80th Avenue T�,?: !Torth of 216th St. S.17. 722
Sbuth of 216th St. F.T11. 817
B"W
1540
2 770 7--wram 24 TTmx
Add + 5 percent - 820 !,.T).T. Adjusted for 1976
The volurn of traffic that has a destination of the MaPln- Bar Ranch is
about nrercent of the total 24 hour volum of the eAsting roadvmy-
80th Avenue W. q.be 90 vehicles will Ix,. in a 3-hour tim. It is f.+-e opin-
ion of this cle-parbmnt tiat the 91) veldclm in 3 hours will not adversely
irpact the total volurre of traffic.
it is recommided t-'%at ingrr-qs be established fran thmn evist-ing south
&-ivL-;av with vehiclem turning left tratrolina north and parUng Twarallel
vrLth th� zrain building. This muld allow the' dbildren to qet out of the
car an tl-e pm-Amcrx side rmar the building and -prande the rost safety.
Upon exitinq, the drivex would proceed n=th, turn left ancl exit throuch
the nortli drivm-w. qm traffic f1m: txmild function as a mr-.4,,W loop
south to north with a stop in front of the buildirg. Tf On cars use, this
syston and trawl in single ftle, &mt 6 vehicles can �m -2aiting on
private property and not on 80th Avenue W. ntds waild qmativ relieve
the ccngestion on 80th Avenue T17. Otaf f parking nbould br. lcmated at ete
rear of the main buildim. nl=porary poOzzinq could �,v located in the
area between the tm drivemm with acmss frm the coe--,,my loon system.
It is mmosted that the drivewayr, he sioned and meked accordingly.
I'M
. N:7,,TA.,mJr
-TO
FOR. 41 - LITTLE'S
SUBJECT:
NTER-OFFICE COMMUN�
aiff FILE OAT ' E�
FROM
K
auj up
CY V_ ;\
I rn
cfy-, rr, exck -9\a-t— y)-\ C\ V_�
lk
Ckc 16 LOD 0
19
'400
A IZA N C-fi
AMIT12V�Lv
1" 154 ffooN Re u Gq
8.0al L.01 hi CA
La'A 01 rA <w 'N
ZCN= � Nn
:K\
PLAN \4(VW
NM
UILDIIJO�jj
so
t-A.T.-S.