The URL can be used to link to this page

21823 92ND AVE W.PDFiiiiii 11111111 15496 21823 92ND AVE W ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: --1,-2 :7 06 3 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): / f f3 -0 3 LIA COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS:- T4 Ll-�(z DETERMINATION: F1 Conditional Waiver �KStudy Required E] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: lallh,6 1611Z PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: q1 36 SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: q1W# 5 - SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DA' STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: LATEMP\DSTs\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc PentecRECEIVEL) 11�r 'WrIvi PRI ffir NOV 0 W, VIRON M E N TA L .3 1992 q tg'. EVG/NEjiR1,VG Wetland Delineation Report Final Report Project Number: 130-001 Prepared for City of Edmonds Mr. Carl Asklund Mr. Harold Wright Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington Prepared by Tracey P. McKenzie Pentec Environmental, Inc. 120 West Dayton, Suite A7 Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 775-4682 October 27, 1992 EDON 6, 0 Wetland Delineation Final Report Project Number: 130-01 Prepared for City of Edmonds, Mr. Carl Asklund, and Mr. Harold Wright Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington Submitted to City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Prepared by Tracey P. McKenzie Pentec Environmental, Inc. 120 West Dayton, Suite A7 Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 775-4682 October 27, 1992 013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Background.......................................................... I Regulatory jurisdiction ................................................. 3 Methods 4 General 4 Field 4 General Delineation ................................................. 4 Vegetation.............................. I ........................... 5 Hydrology......................................................... 5 Soils 6 Surveying and Mapping ............................................. 6. Findings..................................................... 7 Wetlands 7 Wetland Descriptions .................................................. 7 Upland Communities ................................................. 11 Discussion.................................................. 12 Limitations................................................... 14 References......... .......................................... 15 Appendix 1� WETLAND DELINEATION CITY OF EDMONDS, MR. CARL ASKLUND, AND MR. HAROLD WRIGHT INTRODUCTION Pentec Environmental, Inc. (Pentec), was asked by Mr. Carl Asklund, Mr. Harold Wright, and the City of Edmonds to delineate and evaluate the wetland on two adjacent pieces of property belonging to Mr. Carl Asklund and Mr. Harold Wright. The purpose of this report is to document the work performed, identify� the delineated wetland. boundaries on Mr. Asklund's property and Mr. Wright's property, map the wetland's location, describe its characteristics, evaluate its functions, and identify mitigation measures appropriate to ensure the integrity of the wetland and adjacent buffer. The on -site evaluation was conducted on September 3,1992. One wetland was identified and delineated. During the delineation process, areas were considered wetlands as deft . ned by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and as implemented by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The wetlands were.delineated using the methodology outlined in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineation jurisdictional Wetlands (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation ' [FICWD] 1989). Wetlands were classified using Cowardin et al. (1979). The wetland was rated using the City of Edmonds definition in Section 20.15B.020(00), contained in Ordinance Number 2874. BACKGROUND Before the site visit, background reference materials were assembled and reviewed to familiarize the wetland ecologist with the site. These materials were provided by the property owners, the City of Edmonds, and Pentec. The wetland has been ' documented and mapped on the National Wetland Inventory map (USFWS 1987) (Figure 1) and on the Snohomish County Tomorrow maps prepared by Harza Northwest under contract to Pentec. N ftAtec 001 30\001 \FINAL.RPT:TPM page 1 IL rP_4 SEtt tt PA B YYA��P" Tu, ink.. 1-61 417 isL '0 Ed hi,)nd& 4GB�R High-Sch 49 'Ch C=. wal OA Tw see r B t - 6 4 \' low. 4 P c -d saw 0 I d a e is er.a Noes &.80 as w .80 mew no lie B as* a see*** so so Geese Owk, FIgUre 1 Extent of entire wetland as Indicated on the National Wetland Inventory map. I'Mcc 00 1 30\001 \FINAL.RPT:TPM page 2 0 Is The properties examined are in a residential section of Edmonds north of 220th Street. The wetland is bounded to the north by residences directly south of 218th Street Southwest, to the south by residences directly north of 220th Street Southwest, to the east.by residences, and to the west by residences directly west of 92nd Street. Both residential lots are rectangular. Mr. Asklund's lot is about 0.61 acres in size. The lot contains a small house in the northwest portion of the lot and a garage/storage shed east of the house. The proposed use of the property is to short plat the property and build a second house in the center of the lot. Mr. Wright's lost is about 0.45 acres in size. The lost is currently cleared (except for a large cedar) and vacant. The proposed use is to build a single-family home on the lot. REGULATORY JURISDICTION The City of Edmonds interim critical areas and resource lands title (Ordinance Number 2874) will implement the critical areas regulations. The interim regulations provide for exemptions and exceptions to use of land, development standards for alteration of wetlands, criteria for critical area studies, and mitigation. The interim regulations classify the wetland as a regulated critical habitat. 1"tev 001 30\001\F1 NAL.RPT:TPM page 3 METHODS GENERAL A review of reference materials was made before the site visit to determine if the wetland had been identified on the site by other sources and, if so, how it had been classified. These references included a site map provided by the property owners, the National Wetland Inventory map (USFWS 1987), Snohomish County Tomorrow map (1991), US Geological Survey topographic map —Edmonds -east quadrangle, and Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Snohomish County Area, Washington (Debose and Klungland 1983). The wetland ecologist walked the two properties and examined the general extent of the wetland boundary identified by the reference material. During the site evaluation and wetland delineation sample plots were located both within the wetland boundary and outside the wetland boundary in order to characterize the wetland community or communities and the upland community or communities and to determine the overall wetland rating. The wetland community type will be discussed as it is described by Cowardin et al. (1979). Wetland types include palustrine emergent (PEM), palustrine scrub/shrub (PISS), palustrine forested (PFO), palustrine aquatic bed (PAB), and palustrine open water (POW). The rating system, used to determine the wetland category is in accordance with the City of Edmonds interim ordinance. Survey work was completed by Sajonia & Associates, Seattle. Standard survey techniques were used to, locate the property boundaries, wetland delineation boundary flags, and buffer flags. FIELD General Delineation The Routine On -site Determination protocol outlined in the Federal Manual (FICWD 1989) was used during the site survey. An assess mient of the wetland boundary was made by walking and flagging the edge of those portions of the wetland located on Mr. Asklund's property and on Mr. Wright's property. Sample plots were located in distinct vegetation units within and outside the wetland that adequately represented the character of the vegetation communities. BMW 001 30\001 T1 NAL.RPT:TPM page 4 0 Vegetation The data collected were consistent with the Plant Community Assessment Procedure of the Routine On -site Determination (FICWD 1989). Dominant (usually those with greater than 20 percent cove0and subdominant (usuafly those found with between 5 an . d 20 percent cover) plant species in each vegetation stratum (tree canopy, shrub zone, and herbaceous groundcover) were recorded for each plot. Each plant's wetland indicator status was assigned using the US Fish and Wildlife Servic e National List of Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest —Region 9 (Reed 1988). The indicator code for plant species is noted below: Wetlands probability (percent chance that plant Code Designation will be found In a wetland) OBL Obligate wetland species > 99 FACW Facultative wet 67 to 99 FAC Facultative 34 to 66 FACU Facultative upland 1 to 33 UPL Obligate upland < 1 NI No indicator status When 50 percent or more of the dominant plants in a vegetative unit have an indicator status of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC, the vegetation is considered hydrophytic. Each vegetation unit at the site was classified as hydrophytic or non-hydrophytic based on the percent of the area covered by the don-dnant species. Synonymy used in this report follows Hitchcock and Cronquist (1976), and scientific names and indicator statuses are used only in the first reference to each species. Hydrology Hydrologic indicators were determined using the guidelines provided in the Federal Manual (FICWD 1989). These indicators include visual observation of site inundation, soff saturation, 00130\001TINALRPTIPM FNIMC page 5 lZi 0 0 mottling in the soil associated with'the roofing zone of plants (rhizosphere), water marks on vegetation, water-bo mie sediment deposits, and wetland drainage patterns. Soils On -site samples were taken in each w.etland plot using a soil * shovel. Soils were characterized using standard Soil Conservation Service protocol. Soil colors were identified using a Munsell soil color chart (Munsell Color 1988). Depths to soil saturation and.surface inundation were recorded for each plot. Soil samples were also examined along the wetland/upland boundary to determine the exact delineation line location. This multiplicity of samples identified and verified differences in soils between major sampling points and verified limits of mapped soil unit boundaries. Presence of a chroma of less than 1 (if no mottles are present) or 2 (if mottles are present) and gley characteristics (for mineral soils) or organic characteristics (for peats and mucks) were used as indications of hydric soils as outlined in the guidelines provided in the Federal Manual (FICWD 1989). Surveying and Mapping Wetland boundary flags and buffer flags were surveyed using standard survey techniques. The survey points were transferred to a computer database to produce a map of the two properties, the wetland edge.(with numbered points corresponding to flags placed in the field by the wetland ecologist), and the buffer area between the wetland edge and the developable upland areas of the two properties at a scale of 1 inch equal to 50 ft. V Fusee 001 30\001 \FINAL.RPT:TPM pagg 6 FINDINGS The edge of one wetland crosses through several residential plots. Figure I shows the general extent of the entire wetland, and Figure 2 shows the extent of the wetland on Mr. Asklund's property and Mr. Wright's property as surveyed by Sajonia & Associates. The dominant and subdominant vegetation found within the portion of the wetland on the two properties is listed on copies of the field data sheets in the Appendix. No threatened, endangered, or'sensitive plant species were found on site during this investigation, and none have been found in previous studies (WNHP 1991). WETLANDS The NWI (1987) map and the Snohon-dsh County Tomorrow map indicate that the wetland is a PAB/PF0 wetland (Figure 1). The wetland occurs within Soil Unit 17—Everett gravelly sandy loam (Figure 3). The predominant wetland community type found on the two properties is deciduous forested wetland (willow) and aquatic bed (pond weed and sedge). WETLAND DESCRIPTIONS The wetland is located in a topographically low position relative to the two properties. There is approximately a 2 to 3 ft difference in topography between the upland portions of, -the properties and the edge of the PAB. The actual depth of the PAB was not measured or surveyed. The PAB portion of the wetland on both Mr. Asklund"s property and Mr. Wright's property is dominated by pond weed, Lemna minor (OBL), and shore sedge, Carex lenticularis (FACW+). Some Douglas's spirea, Spiraea douglasii (FACW), was also noted growing on downed trees within the PAB. There is virtually no forested wetland on Mr. Asklund's property. The small band of forested community located on Mr. Wright's property consists of willows, Salix spp. (FAC to OBL), growing on the perimeter of the PAB. pejac 00130\001\FINAL.RPT:TPM page 7 we` -777'=�: 77 .7 71 J6. 41 lift a WN Z..— LX I-S 14 IT� 0 0 The soils are black muck (10YR 2/1) within the PAB and dark brown (10YR 2/2 to 2/3 with mottles) within the small forested fringe. The on -site soil investigations within the PAB are not characterized in the SCS Soil Survey. The wetland site is located with Soil Unit 17—Everett gravelly sandy loam. Although portions of the PAB were covered with water and other areas closer to the wetland/upland edge were saturated to the surface, water drift lines and water marks on the vegetation indicate that the water level of the PAB is greater in the winter or during storm events. The sources of hydrology for the PAB appears to be mainly precipitation and storm water runoff that enters into the pond via a shallow west -east ditch running along the very northern portion of Mr. Asklund's property and then into a north -south ditch on the eastern property boundary of Mr. Asklund's property. UPLAND COMMUNITIES The upland vegetation community on Mr. Asklund's property is dominated by lawn grasses (unidentified Grammidae). The upland vegetation community on Mr. Wright's property is dominated by Himalayan blackberry, Rubus discolor--procera (FACU-), velvet grass, Holcus lanatus (FAQ, and evergreen blackberry, Holcus laciniatus (FACU+). The soils in the upland portion of Mr. Asklund's property are dark brown with mottles below about 8 inches. At the time of the site visit, the soils were not saturated, and no water filled a hole dug to about 25 inches. The soils in the upland portion of Mr. Wright's property have been somewhat disturbed from land clearing. They are a dark brown, gravelly sand (10YR 2/2 to 2/3) with no mottles and at the time of the site visit they were not saturated. The on -site soil examinations in the upland areas confirm the soil mapping unit —Everett gravelly sandy' loam. This soil type is not on the Washington hydric soil list (updated November 20, 1990). peifte 00130\001\FINAL.RPT:TPM page 11 R of 0 0 DISCUSSION The wetland edges located on Mr. Asklund's property and on Mr. Wright's property are part of a larger wetland. The wetland is predominately a PAB with a small PFO (mostly young forested deciduous trees) fringe located on Mr. Wright's property. The predominant wetland community (PAB) is smaller than 1 acre. Including the small forested fringe increases the size of the entire wetland, but it still appears to be less than 1 acre in size. Based on size and class, the entire wetland would be classified a Category 2 wetland according to the City of Edmonds interim regulations for critical areas. Category 2 wetlands are wetlands "that are equal to or less than 1 acre and greater than 2,500 square feet and have two or more wetland classes; or wetlands equal to or less than 1 acre and greater than 2,500 square feet that have a forested class ... ... This wetland consists of two classes: PAB and PFO, even though the forested component is relatively small. The wetland currently functions to store storm water and provides some habitats for waterfowl (e.g., mallard ducks). Without prior knowledge and more extensive research on the quality of the wetland prior to residential development and construction of shallow storm ditches, determining whether this wetland has been significantly degraded as a result of storm water inputs is not possible. The author of this report does not know if septic systems from surrounding residences drain into this wetland. According to Section 20.15B.140, Development Standards, Category 2 wetlands shall not be used for storm water management purposes including retention and detention unless the use is part of a publicly designed and funded program to control storm water problems. With the recent formation of a City LID in this area, storm water inputs into this wetland are likely to decrease. Based on the wetland category (2), a buffer of 50 ft from the wetland edge is required. The buffer conditions prohibit or limit the removal or alteration of existing vegetation in the buffer areas as necessary to preserve the functions of the wetland. Figure 2 shows buffers 25 and 50 ft from the wetland edge. Both buffers will be referred to below in the discussion of mitigating measures appropriate to preserving the wetland. The vegetation within the 50-ft buffer zone is of low quality and does little to protect the integrity of the wetland. The buffer on Mr. Asklund's property consists of lawn grasses; the buffer on Mr. Wright's property consists of large piles of wood debris, bare ground, and blackberries. The buffer could be improved greatly by removal of debris and planting diverse native shrub vegetation appropriate for a buffer area. The City's standards for buffers do not 00130\001\FINAL.RPT:TPM page 12 0 0 explicitly state that the City can require a property owner to replant a buffer area within the buffer prescribed for a given wetland category. Should either property owner request that the City allow a reduced buffer width or buffer width averaging, the City could require that the property owners plant the buffer with native vegetation appropriate for a wetland buffer. In summary, the City can take two measures to preserve the integrity of the wetland: 1) require the removal of debris and brush piles (from Mr. Wright's property only), a standard 50-ft buffer, and planting of the buffer with diverse native vegetation (interim regulations are unclear, however, regarding. whether the City can require a property owner to plant additional vegetation if the standard buffer width is required) and 2) require the removal of debris and brush piles (from Mr.* Wright's property only) and allow buffer width averaging or a reduced buffer width (only if the property owner would be denied reasonable use of their property as defined by the City of Edmonds). The City can require the property owners to develop a buffer enhancement plan using native vegetation if the City allows buffer width reduction or averaging. A buffer enhancement plan would provide an opportunity to plant the buffer with appropriate native vegetation and would help to protect the integrity and quality of the wetland. 1"We 001 30\001\FINAL.RPT:TPM page 13 LIMITATIONS Environmental site assessments are noncomprehensive by nature and are subject to many limitations, including those presented below. This study does not provide quantification or a guarantee regarding the presence or absence of wetlands. The results and 'conclusions of this report represent the 'professional opinions of Pentec Environmental, Inc. They are based in part upon (a) site reconnaissance, (b) information provided by the property owners and the City of Edmonds, and (c) examination of public domain information concerning the proposed site. Work performed conforms to accepted standards in the field for Routine Delineations using the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating jurisdictional Wetlands (Federal Interagency Committee For Wetland Delineation 1989). Final determination of the jurisdictional wetland boundaries pertinent to the Clean Water Act Section 404, however, is the responsibility of the Seattle District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or Region X, US Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, Washington. Many different regulatory agencies may require review of final site development plans that could potentially effect zoning, water quality, and/or habitat functions of the lands in question. Thus, the findings and conclusions contained in this report should be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies prior to any detailed site planning and/or construction activities. Because site activities and regulations beyond Pentec's control could change at any time after the completion of our site visit, our observations, findings, and opinions can be considered valid only as of the date of the site visit noted in this report. 00130\001\FINAL.RPT:TPM page 14 REFERENCES Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. Golet, and G. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. US Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-79/31. Debose, A., and M. Klungland. 1983. Soil Survey of Snohomish County Area, Washington, US Department of Agriculture, Soil conservation Service, 197 pp. plus maps. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. 1989. US Army Corps of Engineers, US Environmental Protection Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, and USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. Cooperative technical pub. Hitchcock, C., and A. Cronquist. 1976. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. Munsell Color. 1975. Munsell soil color charts. KoHmorgen Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland. Reed, P. 1988. National list of species that occur in wetlands: Northwest —Region 9. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Welut 86/WIZ. 47. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. National Wetland Inventory. Washington Natural Heritage Program (WNHP). 1991. Endangered, threatened, and sensitive vascular plants of Washington. Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. 001 30\001 \FINAL.RPT:TPM page 15 U) Cl) 11 PROJECT/SITE: WrInV4. - ('L+4 of ftim-lmdll -12- INITIALS: DATA PLOT #: DATE: 9 1 !1 TOM NORM CONDS?/DISTURBANCE?: -COWARDIN CLASS" k3,pu4)D POT % SPECIES STRATUM STATUS COVER lkys loc, f2utxy, HN(u" MIX 5' mr- lo p 6 a f'A OvJ), TYlUt6m-QYrA+,rvm- &YJ FACu S� IWI t % FAC OR WETTER: Z �Z HYDRO VEG? 0 NOTES: I SERIES: LIST? MATRIX COLOR: IUME HISTOSOLWHISTIC EPIPEDON? MOTTLE COLOR: HYDRIC SOILS? NOTES: 3 -(. jotis I)ojrc 06-JLW U, bFro 50 (.vAot (� n-'�an �k—) -1- 20 7- A- L I � m q Lmj - sand, 11 INUN?/SAT? fj DEPTH: NOTES: WL? WiSOFORIAMELONOT FRU PROJECT/SITE: WA10M -' 0-+L4 0C 'FC1ffloYXX4 DATE: INITIALS: TPO DATAPLOT#: 'IMIT-R NORM CONDS?/DISTURBANCE?.-4 /Y -COWARDINCLASS: SPECIES STRATUM STATUS COVER 5-lo LA InAkritl"� 40 4/0 PoLqnLamy\ 019L lo Lo vn am 0, WhPA Q uk 41-lhb,10 K tfi Q-t- LC-Ck+C'V' WW) OP CeWAIM is % FAC OR WETTER:'�'5D HYDRO VEG? NOTES: SERIES: Fv� LIST? MATRIX COLOR: HISTOSOLWHISTIC EPIPEDON? MOTTLE COLOR: HYDRIC SOIL.S? NOTES: 0 im byv)�, pi Loz INUN?/SAT? DEPTH: NOTES: e5 Ln CPC;O IJJ&'ee Otte" 1") VA cj.ua jus+- �� ,f V r. n Dia ie Y a re IA Vv L. r USC%FORLSWIELONOT FW 9.1 PROJECTISITE: h'ikk UiT) LN WrAMd-D DATE: 2 INITIALS: IKA DATA PLOT #: NORM CONDS?IDISTURRANCF?: \) / N —COWARDIN CLASS: % SPECIES STRATUM STATUS COVER tocc cL-,L -,6 11 < uL > k4ko,�d S(8t. (am wainud. ol yt/)()IiKj kn s (k gy- -F41 ol 1swal Q xkW QQ2.ir,( -,:;cl 1-441 sibsh-dk, % FAC OR WETTER: 4Sb HYDRO VEG? 0 NOTES: SERIES: E&AV*' LIST? MATRIX COLOR:7.5-lp-q/3 HISTOSOLWHISTIC EPIPgD—ON? MOTTLE COLOR: HYDRIC SOILS? NOTES: M049-1b ow. a PFU rrv�v— 6 iv Z f'.v(Y-.o 0-v lei I INUN?/SAT? S DEPTH: NOTES: w ll-ltjlv��,iu�l (); lcyl-I r-�. uz WL? L1[5C%F0PJAS41EL0f10T F PROJECT/SITE: (- DATE:- 913RZ INITIALS: - NORM CONDS?/DISTURBANCE?:- � d mo4do DATA PLOT #: % SPECIES STRATUM STATUS COVER 5 �At 40 OBL 10 'ovow N1,15 oy'l eptq7� AO a S, A r111110601" �so[21bw&kx1kTr) ML J, .x JanficulaAt;3' 61 I:f 1 *0, aj- 06 L Lemna 1Ftcqi,TV . TI L VrA wtc5imm tk*%fe %knier 1 . twn el�oc- J2 % FAC OR WETTER: HYDRO VEG? NOTES: SERIES: F-VVJO LIST? MATRIX COLOR: IMP- Z1 I HISTOSOLWHISTIC EPIPEDON? MOTTLE COLOR. HYDRIC SOILS? 4 NOTES: black, rnur�-' 4 9-, INUN?/SAT? DEPTH:NOTES: WL? kfGC%F0Ak6%F1EL0f10T FRU 0 SWEET FILE RECEIVED CITY COPY JUN - 1 1993 PERMIT COUNTER J\ 7 4W� ! I '�d +100 C. 0 pERMIT GOUNTEct NNING �t�A Av-e- liloll� STREEr FILE Critical. Areas Checklist Site Information Project Name: _Z_ Permit Number. Site Location: 429 AJ Property Tax Account Number. -3 02- 70 ze (a`cFes orsqu= feet): Approximate Site Si Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this'site before? -.49f.42- General Site Conditions 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? Date of most recent action: 11M Soils / Topography. 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil qpe(s)? 3. Describe the general site t0P09r4PhY Check all that apply - )Rat less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet.) . Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30'% ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments ju.;4 - ffZ,__-Z 9 - - 1. Hydrology/Vegetation 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water. 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. rox. Depth: —App 6. Site is in the floodway floodplain . of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or an areaAere water flows across the grow,.ds -surface? flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? 8. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: 4r 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: 11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site: IVEK-:�Cridti a eat is-oot.mquirle r P evie e! DeterfhInatiow u' 'e .W Planner. ate Rev Y27192 'W90 -194- City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklistftftft" The puxpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas we or may be present on the subject. property. Ihe information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily avulable from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories,. maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, fill out the checklist� sign and date i4 and submit it to the City� no City will review. the checHist, make a precursory site vW and malm a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application- The Critical Areas Checklist. contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to hisiher submittal of a development permit to the City. Mith a signed copy of this form, die applicant should also submit a vicinity map of the parcel with enough dctdl 9W City staff can find and identify the subject pazccl(s). In addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowl-Age (fill ut the appro riate column beloW). R�G-TuFi� M7C-kz-T-I S -� Owner / Apolicant: AppLlRepr2ntative: 1 M�.A L A e\(* Pr" L-P A-ICIL't+ i (A- hyarne e Title 4k 2-(, (2- (, ST- S E Aftess - S city/State, ZIP �Phone Title ell /07-1Z 1�14vjc---5C--!- Street Aftew -2 City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date MEMORANDUM CrrY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION June 10, 1992 TO: JEFFREY S. WILSON, AICP, CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR CA-92-66 FILE FROM: JOHN BISSELL, CODE ENFORCEMENT TECIINICIAN SUBJEC`r: CRITICAL AREAS STUDY, CA-92-66 I have reviewed the site located at 21823 92nd Av W. There is a mapped class 3 wetland on the site. ECDC 20.15A.050(D) and 20.15A. 150(A) state that if a critical area is determined to be present on site, a critical area study shall be conducted. The subject wedand appears to have at least three wedand classes and may be as large as an acre. If this is the case, do wetland would be a class two wedand, not a class three wedand. Therefore, in this case , I recommend that a study be conducted by a wetlands biologist and a land surveyor, licensed in the State of Washington. Tim wetlands biologist is to perform the following: 1. Classification of the wetland pursuant to the criteria established in ECDC section 20.15b.070(A)(5) 2. Delineate the edge of the wetland on the site. 3. State any mitigating measures appropriate to preserving the wetlands. After the wedand biologist has delineated the wetland boundary, I recommend that a surveyor, licensed in the State of Washington perform the following: 1. Physically mark the edge of the wetland, 2. Delineate and physically mark the required buffer 3. Delineate and physically mark the required building setback from the buffer. 4. Create a map showing the wetland, the buffer and the building setback. 5. Create a separate legal description for the wetland area and its buffer. Both the Wetlands Biologist and the Land Surveyor shall enter into a three party contract with the applicant and the City of Edmonds as required in ECDC 20. ISA. 150(D) If you concur with these recommendations, please state your concurrence in the space provided below. 4W S. Wilson, AICP, Date Current Planning Supervisor PC Building Permit File upon application Street File Applicant z Iwo FILF CITY OPM NDN Q, 9 04. 1 '3 c, , Address of Construction: C-;Izal- 213 - 9c? /J10 SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT J'�,!O 8 2 Property Legal Descri-ption (Include all easements): 16 2 7 - C-2 /7/,g - 0 0- CC CA. nF.CF .1VED I TREATMENT PLANT1 AUG 1 7 1993 I \1 PUBLIC WORKS Ut" Owner and/or Contractor: �-nccrs/_5 State License No. /_6 617,S&**�C_ ) 76 (2 2 Building Permit No. qZ 0,3 "Z/ 8 $LSingle Family 0 Multi -Family (No. of Units-) 1:1 Commercial El Public Invasion into City Right -of -Way: � No El Yes RW Construction Permit No. Cross other Private Property -A No El Yes Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I certify that I haWread and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. 5 fz- > Date I _k . A * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION * OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Permit Fee: - 3 0 . Issued By Trunk Charge: (�2 -51 0-C Date Issued - Assessment Fee: _CZQA9 Receipt No.: -7 c>? Lid No.: ::::� Z Z Partial Inspection: Comments Date -Initial Reason Rejected: Date -initial Final Ins ; pection Approved: Date�A-�Z Initi S. M�,�NLAIVO. ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: Fite Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3!90 TL t" f CA A Side Sewer Drawing t e ly W 151wil a EASEMENT NO - -------------------------------------------- v NEW CONSTRUCTION JZ REPAIRS F-1 LID NO - ------------------ ASMT. NO - ------------------ OWNER---------- G.&wi ......... Moo.vue ------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR ---------------------------- ------------------------------------ — ................ PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS ..2-1-81-3 ........ 9Z-".o ... Aq-CI-W .......... --- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO - -------- --------------------------- --, HORM±L-ow 1 4 1 U ND Av W. PWW-0001-1 1175 (REV.1 1/78) DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAMEOF ADDITION ----------------- I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Z1823 91"ClAW.W. t 1 &5 1 4 I SEND 1-yRr-A�11W"UE:-N�-f PLANT FE"ce CAP COP 133 J. --.a. L�l -a-" � V WTR. 2! %,_Pr--mfk .npproveu: .Z-122.3 ....... By --- ri4w - - ------------------ 0 0 NOTICE: r -o---w-'ar-ranty...O-r-a-c--c--D- d�-Y---- - N formation'shown on the attached The in for u-se by the City Of map(s) was corn ' piled nsultants. Edmonds/ Its Empl-oyees and Co Th,.e City of *Edm.onds does. not. warrant the accuracy of anything set for.th on these m a p (S"). A n . y person or entity -requesting a copy.should conduct an.independent orm . ation Shown-o inquiry regard'ng the inf imIted to, -t-Fe Map(s), including, but not J the location of any sewer stub shown. Suc -not exist and may sewer stubs may or may or may not exist at the location shown. nor its �'ty of Edmo C, Neitheir the k_'] M p-,-0,yee*s 0,r off i-ce-rs -shal-1 be 1--i ab-'Fe for thE information given on this map(5), nor for entation provided based any one repres upon said. map(S'. 6 R, � RSCEIVED DIUBLIC wORKS DS I City Clerk City of Edmonds 505 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 OECORDE D r -07 STREET pj e7 FR 21 PM 3 AUDITOR '01UN TY, WA SH.T /Z" / � -Z3 914 Y-1-1 AV, U - UTILITY EASEMENT Grantor: Moore, Linda J. and Gary S. Grantee: City of Edmonds Legal Description: The North 5.00 feet and the North 25.00 feet of the East 35.00 feet of the following described parcel: The South one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of the Southwest quarter of Government Lot 2, Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East; except the North 83.00 feet thereof and except the West 20.00 feet thereof for roads. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 3027 042 003 003 VOL. 3 3- 0 0 PAGE0628 UTILITY EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned, Linda J. and Gary S. Moore , hereby grants to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation, and maintenance of a storm line over, across, through, and below the following described property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said storm line , together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement hereby granted is located in the COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, and is more particularly described as follows: The North 5.00 feet and the North 25.00 feet of the East 35.00 feet of the following described parcel: The South one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of the Southwest quarter of Government Lot 2, Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East; except the North 83.00 feet thereof and except the West 20.00 feet thereof for roads. --ITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements ';' .1% kX,'C Nring the construction, maintenance, and repair of said utility or utilities, i�'#N' cas "', "I gf4#tpq, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, up, -_,J)ermanent easement. vi , ` At 11"0' iAA. - S tOE thiS Exid'IEfE TAX -REQUIRED day of Ja22�� 19 ? -7 Ll NOTARY PUBLIC STATEAM *Xg&GTON) STATE OF WASHINGTON DIA BOCK C ull'y T MV Appointment Expires MAY 30.1997 C On this day personally appeared before me M crju and to me known to b�-be individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF 19'—) :3 0 NOTARY PUBIWiin aind for the State 9 of Washi di MOOREESE.DOC voL. 3,-3r 0 0 nu 0 6 2 9 92ND AVENUE POND OVERFLOW PROJECT SCALE: 1"= 40' 21821 EASEMENT EASEMENT EASEMENT EASEMENT llii�'EIT 21823 L EASEMENT Lij D 4W MH EHIVE GRATE NOTE: WETLAND DELINEATION BY PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL OCTOBER 27. 1992 Low �-7� ikbl C=) RECEIVED 2'� V';1J r3uBLIC WORKS D'__'I T City Clerk City of Edmonds 505 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 STREET�.,ADDRESSO FILF RECORDED 97APR2J PH 3:06 .4 00' 'A UTILITY EASEMENT 00 Grantor: Highland, Scott E. Grantee: City of Edmonds Legal Description: The South five (5.00) feet of the following described parcel: The North 83.00 feet of the South one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of the or" Southwest quarter of Government Lot 2, Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East; except the West 20.00 feet for road. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 3027 042 004 00. VOL. 320- OPAGE0625 I UTILITY EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned, Scott E. Highland , hereby grants to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation, and maintenance of a storm line over, across, through, and below the following described property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said storm line _-, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement hereby granted is located in the COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, and is more particularly described as follows: The South five (5.00) feet of the following described parcel: The North 83.00 feet of the South one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of the Southwest quarter of Government Lot 2, Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East; except the West 20.90 feet for road. THE CITY agrees to restore to. substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance, and repair of said utility or utilities, provided the grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, upon, or within the permanent easement. DATED this day of NO EXCISE TAX ffEOUIRED STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) APR 2 2 1997 �r#.,rjjjj;sh Coo ity TreasUttr @oS E)ANT.IN1 by j� On this day personally appeared before me an& to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and fo instrument, and acknowledged that — g� signed the same as 2 free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF .19 M. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State Of Washington, residingat FP �F 10;i� HIGHLAND�1)00, 9 dih A 6]) oopuE0626 7ULA r.410 8 00 v o L. 3 6.� 0 0 LAJ 92ND AVENUE POND OVERFLOW PROJECT CZZ) SCALE: 1"= 40' tL 21821 IL L i y SC;,-,OM&ASEMENT EASEMENT EU<MSEMEWT EASEMENT EASEMENT ZEMENT PL cn Lu 3: a: 21823 LEASEMENT Lu D 4W MH Z XrGRATE z Lu IL NOTE. WETLANO DEUNEATION BY PENTEC ENVRONMENTAL OCTOBER 27. 1 992 0) 0 Item #: Ftn EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Memo Originator: James C. Walker For Action: X For Information: Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF -STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FROM SCOTT EEIGBLAND AT 21821 - 92ND AVE. W. AND LINDA AND GARY MOORE AT 21823 - 92ND AVE. W. Agenda Time: Agenda Date: Exhibits Attached: 1. Easements 2. Vicinity Map Consent January 21,1997 Clearances: Departmentflnitials Admin Svcs/Finance City,Attorney_ City Clerk Court Personnel Fire Police Reviewed by Council Committee: Community Svcs Engineering Parks & Rec Planning Public Works Treatment Plant City Council Mayor Finance Conwwnhy Services Public Safay Approvedfor Consent Agenda: Recommend Review by Full Council. Expenditure Amount Appropriation Required: $0 Budgeted: $0 Required: $0 Funding Source: N/A Narrative: A storm drainage system is required to collect and drain overflow from the non -draining pond located between 21 8th and 220th Streets and 8 1 st and 92nd Avenues to the storm system on 220th Street S.W. During periods of heavy rains, the water level rises and reaches the existing houses. Installation of an overflow structure and drainage system will control the level of the pond. This project is budgeted for 1997 and should begin this year. Recommended Action: Council accept the storm drainage easements from Scott Highland, Linda and Gary Moore. Council Action: 112- 11�7 UTIOLITYEASEMEENT IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned, Linda J. d Gary S. Moore hereby grants to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation,operation, and maintenance of a storm line , over, across, through, and below the following described property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with die location, construction, and maintenance of said storm line , together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement hereby granted is located in the COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, and is more particularly described as follows: The North 5.00 feet and the North 25.00 feet of the East 35.00 feet of the following described parcel: The * South one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of the Southwest quarter of Government Lot 2, Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East;- except the North 83.00 feet thereof and except the West 20.00 feet thereof for roads. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are dis��811-during the construction, maintenance, and repair of said utility or utilities, proided pto tbAl. gto rs, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, upon, or Nv A the permanent easement. 'DA�Eb,-" dayof ae2at:s� 19, '7 6r STATE OF WAS11INGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF WASHINGTON DIA BOCK MV Appointment Expires MAY 30.1997 On this day personally appeared before me mcrju and to me known to 44h individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF Af\ I k A 190111 'Xi Ve S:22ta��te�� NOTARY PUB in and for of Washr�ftp, residi" al,—(, A, Elm, _�A MOOREESEMOC EXRIBIT 1-- PAGE 2 0 V)l :D z zi I .92ND AVENUE POND OVERFLOW PROJECT' SCALE: 1"= 30, I r ST6-RMORAIF ,TASEMENT EASEMENT EASEMENT CASEMENT EASEMENT pl. ASEMENT 2.1(525 NOTE: WETLAND DELINEATION BY PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL OCTOBER 27, 1992 40r L EASEMENT 4ir MH W TURMATE E4 H 9 112 C CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH # EDMONDS, WA 98020 * (206) 771-0220 # FAX (206) 771-0221 COM MUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works e Planning * Parks and Recreation * Engineering December 9, 1996 Linda Moore 21823 - 92nd Ave W Edmonds, Wa. 98020 RE: STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT 21823 - 92ND AVE. W. Dear Ms Moore, First, we wish to thank you for granting the subject easement to the City of * Edmonds. -Placement of the storm line and overflow structure will allow us to control the overflow in the pond, diverting it to the existing storm system on 220th St. S.W. and minimize the amount of water that flows onto your property as a result of heavy Tains. Installation of the storm line and structure is scheduled for the summer of 1997. We will inform you as to the exact date. Upon completion of the project, all areas disturbed due to construction shall be restored to original condition. Enclosed is the storm.drainagia easement for the appropriate signatures. Once signed, you may contact me and I will stop by to pick it up or you can mail it to US. Again, we wish to thank you for your support. If you have any questions, please contact Don Fiene or me at 771-0220. Sincerely, WaVer J di s/� �L. C h /ri s &=nr_7 I V Engineering Specialist ALC/sf Enclosure: Storm Drainage Easement Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Siste:Cities International — Hekinan, Japan V* UTILITY EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned, Linda J. and Gary S. Moore hereby grants to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation, and maintenance of a storm line over, across, through, and below the following described property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said storm line , together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement hereby granted is located in the COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, and is more particularly described as follows: The North 5.00 feet and the North 25.00 feet of the East 35.00 feet of the following described parcel: The South one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of the Southwest quarter of Government Lot 2, Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East; except the North 83.00 feet thereof and except the West 20.00 feet thereof for roads. TEIE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance, and repair of said utility or utilities, provided the grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, upon, or within the permanent easement. DATED this - day of , I STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me and to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER M[Y HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS - DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at MOOREESE.DOC I >1 CL < 0- LL w N 0') 92ND AVENUE POND OVERFLOW PROJECT SCALE: 1 30' IL Z? N It ST6-RMDMf;ASEMENT EASEMENT EASEMENT PL EASEMENT EASEMENT I J. CL 0 L EASEME*NT 41r MH W/ BEEHIVE TRASH GRATE Z? kEMENTPL L NOTE: WETLAND DELINEATION 13Y PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL OCTOBER 27. 1992 cr f � 8 9 0 19 C5 - 0%TREET FILE 09 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works 9 Planning # Parks and Recreation s, Engineering January 20, 1994 James A. Sleighter, A.V.P. Frontier Bank 123 - 3rd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 LAURA M. HALL MAYOR -j 1 /2- V/�Z Re: Frozen fund account #3217-134026 of Loutsis Brothers Construction Co. Dear Mr. Sleighter, Since the above mentioned construction company failed to complete all the engineering requirements at 21823 - 92nd Ave. W., Edmonds under permit number 930348 and failed to respond to our letters regarding said requirements, the City of Edmonds hired a contractor to complete the work. Please send the City a check in the amount of $497.72 from frozen fund account number 3217-134026. The amount covers the work completed. The remaining $402.28 can then be released. If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman at 771-0220, extension 324. Sincerely, e,4-e�f �- a4&4- ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer ALC/RJA/sf Attachment c: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator Loutsis Brothers Construction LOUTSIS.DOC o Incorporoted August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan vtecelv5-0. J. B. Asphalt Paving ASPHALT PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES 22228 95th PL.W. PUBLIC \NORKS DEP Edmonds,WA 98020 .(206) 774-6537 To Address City S T A T E M E N T GY Q.. _n mia - STREET Fim 2067780815 !,W3 00:19 P.01 11to Proposal J. B. Asphalt Paving — 1 11.11% 1 %# GulwTOMM11g, This CMI-alocr 15 regisrareo witti tne swe of washington, legistr3flon no. JUASPP21000, as a gerkiltal/S.Decialty colltiactor ASPHALT PAVEMENT SPECIALTIES ard 1153 1)(18*6 With the state a Dona ol CaM depov Of $15,00044= for the 11900-ke of latif4ioo clWrns ag2inol the PaMirto Lots, Df ive wa y2, Patios C0111(aCor for negligent or impi-nit)or work or bromh of contract in Pfitchim 'This bond arraih deposit ,q end Sooter Work the can ituct of Ine co n1ractor's busi nass. ____IA_aY`r%T7ff ED Aim which night 1krige tram the "ON to CGV61' 8 cl 22228 95in PL.W, work done u Ir 1 att. It o . 11 your any sunfiet of materials u&ad in Edrnonde,WA 080.0 r your corm kirtion projecNr any ornPlOYOR of the contractor or T sUbcoWactor is not paid 6 tirle nnniral;lor or subconlratter on (206) 774-6537 Your job. yout pioperh 1140d to fDroo payMilin'. DSAL SUBMITTGL) TO Y A 19 r% A VP ) Z , /Z - — CIA C"A 8 NAME AND LOCATION ?/f_ A �7 t sPecificationa alld e3timates,sucillect io all terms and conditions as V PIL- IE 7�71;76�,x '-A -.is ; .9 ENGIN PSYMOnt Due lb clays following Statement date, Permits, If rar4ijiped, will bo the 0wr6re responhibility. All material is guaranteed as specified. We shrill not be liable for cla-mage to saptic, tanka, U11"i'VOUnd PiPtS Qr1:0ndUit3 not visible frorn surfaCe. We Cannot be reap�oncible lot Uvbgrad* failures. A finance 0harge of 1% per month (12% annual percentage rato) wai be imposod on any ;)63t duo baisfice. In Case suit I$ instituted on any porlion of thla 60niract, r0000nable attorneys fees and court costs will be added to this auntract. WE PROPOSE hvet)y to lurilish ilvaterial and labor - 0orriplote in accoy'dance witi, above kpir4cificcitiono, let, t�iv- z8urn of: dollary (T AtitlhorJ203`�, Nnte: Th'S prAposal " withdrawn by ve if GiUndiure 11 nnt aCcrolod wilhin_,��(Jays. Of Estimator ACCEPlED: The above prices,Spa�:iificaiions ancl conclillons are satisfactory and are hqreby accepl4d. Yf1k) are WhoripqCi to do tt�e wejrk o3 up=ifIgrj. si�lnature PAyfnent will bP Mad& as Outlined above, 0a i C., — b i U n at u re P. 01 -PROPOSA ATRE"t"01" ft6rthshore Paving, Inc. P,0.80x1813 9 Buthell,WA96041 4-8 1 - 6 -5 -97 Ut 2 . : %3 PROPOSAL 5UFIMITTrO TO CAT 6 o'� ADDRESS PHONE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE 4 DATr= OF PLAN$ JOB NAME & LOCATION ARCHITECT JOBPHONE WE HEREBY SUBMIT 8PEOIKATiONS AND GSTWATFS qUQJGCT TO ALL TEAMS & CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH ON BOT14 SIDES. AS FOLLOW& o V f -1,0-4 c.- X/'q -A A OF le 00 10e71110 './rx ass TERIMM Not Cash upon carmilatlen of job. jots in excess of 30 days duration - TQrrnq,: Not Cash upon riloililpt of PW9aa Billing- CONDITICMS: I , TMIS agreement IS "*t to NOM1106hill Paving, Inc.'s approval of purchaw's rredIt within ton days of date of aoceptarice. 2. bilartharione PavbV, Irw. shall not be liable for darnage to or breakage of SaDdo Wks, UndergrourW pipes andforconduits noWeible from the sufIace of V* ground m for any darnap to approaches (indudfnc he street to operty no .1 sidawalks) from I pr 11 3. It IS agreed that In Ca" Wit !a instituted to callaci amount due on this contract or any portion thereof, reasonable attorney's fee$ and Court COSM may be added to this contract 4. Soll.steriltzation(w" kill". If ltv;luded in contract, will be applied at rates Wocill9d by manufacturer. Nofthshore Paving. Inc. will net be responsible for any svboequent growthe or horsetail weed, morning glory, deep rooted ferns or perennials wnien nave not reach maturity prior to application. a. A FINANCE CHARGE of 1'1&% per month, will in chargiva on past due aCCIDUnts. S. Quotations sub;ect to change or eariceilation after 30 days. 7. All agreements are contingent on stlAes, aocidants, delays of oarriers and other delap; tinavoidable or beyond our control. 8. NoAhathara Paving, hm. "I nat be responsible for sLftrade falluFse. 9. Any and ilkil state, county or municloal owlrdis reQUited for the above-mantlored improvilimants wili be obtained oy pufor�aser unlose othaM5a Stipulated. 10. Cw6lomar will be liable for any collemn cositi. ------- e.7:7.— AtModud Signs 1:�CCtFt0b: The above prices, sPecifiCatioms and conditions are satisfaefory and are hereby accept- ed. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Signature Payment will be rMade &S outlined above, Date slonalvee — Revised 4/l/82 PURCHASE QUOTATION SHEET Purchases which will be over $200.00 will require three (3) quotations, and will become a part of the purchase request. LU wkvuv/-.� ,I X &--L - it&- .j W T Qty. Unit Description Req'd F i r m 001wol Firm eWJW1,;V40 F i rm f Ph. # I 7,8-.31ZO Ph - # 4W-6590 Ph.# 774,z457-47 QuoterAW Quoter Quoter Wb" Date Date Date Unit Quote Total Quote Unit Total Quote Unit Quote Total Quote _quote jV '&"" ASOOK ft 404140954"44 6c Awe /0 aglg?:3 f0A0,'&4d APxX A�' owl,4w AJA4 room goo A4,W1 AA;-'0",4e WA�21'. Sub -total Sales Tax Signature (,AfeAr�so lt�iving Quotes Total 127-0. 0V 46'* 37,72- 443-14. 13�W- 04L 01" 7, '79 -M Mail to: P.O. BOX 438 6016 204th S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98046-0438 (206)�778-3126 / FAX 775-1811 STRWT_AnkA_%(MPtr. PAVING, INC. F L-;;LYMPPI077LD IS ALL TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL ASPHALT PAVING PROPOSALTO City of Edmonds PHONE 141111111111F F#771-0221 DATE 11-30-93 ADDRESS 250 5th Ave. N. PROJECT 21823 92nd Ave. W., Edmonds, WA CITY STATE ZIP Ed WA 980 ADDRESS ,-__<ttn: Lyle Christman OWNER RFcE1VE:D Excavate eight (8) inches of material and rade out 4 C 1. _1 .199.3 ENGINEERING on shoulder. Place six (6) inches of crushed rock base, roll compAct, soil sterilize and pAv with two (2) inches of Class "B" asphalt. App_K5�x.___.Z8 square yArd§_______ 594.40 PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT OF INVOICE ALL PRICES PLUS TAX NOTICE TO CUSTOMER: This contractor is registered with the State of Washington, Pegistration No. OLYMPPI077LD, Exp, June I st, as a specialty contractor and has posted with the State a bond of cash deposit of $4,000 for the purpose of satisfying claims against the contractor for negligent or improper work or breach of contract in the conduct of the contractor's business. This bond or cash deposit may not be sufficient to cover a claim which might arise from the work done under your contract. If any supplier of materials used in your construction project or any employee of the contractor or subcontractor is not paid by the contractor or subcontractor on your job, your property may be liened to force payment. If you wish additional protection, you may request the contractor to provide you with original "lien release" documents from each supplier or subcontractor on your project. The contractor is required to provide you with further information about lien release documents if you request it. General information is also available from the Department of Labor and Industries. A late payment charge may be made on any past due balance, which the law calls a "FINANCE CHARGE", and it is computed at a monthly rate of 1-1/2% (annual percentage rate of eighteen percent). It is agreed that in case suit is instituted to collect amount due on this contract or any portion thereof, reasonable attorneys fees and court costs may be added to this contract. PROPOSAL MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY US IF NOT ACCEPTED WITHIN 30 DAYS Permits, it required, will be the owner's responsibility. We shall not be liable for damage to or breakage of septic tanks, underground pipes, and/or conduits not visible from the surface of. the ground nor for any damage to approaches (including sidewalks) from the street to the property line. We cannot be responsible for subgrade failures or settling of subgrade material which was not installed under the above agreement. Soil sterilization (weed killer), if not included in the contract, will be applied at rates specified by manufacturer. Olympic Paving, Inc., will not be responsible for any subsequent growths of horsetail weed, morining glory, deep rooted ferns, or perennials, which have not reached maturity prior to application. All material is guaranteed as specified. All work to be completed in a workman -like manner according to standard practices. Olympic Paving, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any work other than the specifically described above. Any additions or alterations of the above work will be executed only upon written orders and may become an additional charge. All agreements are contingent on strikes, accidents, delays of carriers, and other delays unavoidable or beyond our control. AN AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ON ONE COPY, RETURNED TO US, WILL MAKE THIS A LEGAL CONTRACT PENDING ACCEPTABLE CREDIT APPROVAL AND WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SCHEDULING OF WORK. X,,�, t , II/,30/c7a OLYMPIC PAVING, INC. I DATI! U AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE SIGN AND RETURN FOR ACCEPTANCE