The URL can be used to link to this page

22130 HIGHWAY 99.PDFiiiiiiiiiiiiii 11589 22130 HIGHWAY 99 !- 73�7' Y. OV EDMONDS..: - Call prospect 64107 work ---CI,V,IC CENTER —WATER-SEWER DEPARTMENT Is r;idj'for_ Inspectfton. �wo.insp-06_ tions 'Sat��iSundFy.-jqr�hiolidi6�t8.) .-N2 1039 SI DE- SEWER-; PERMIT ............................................. 'Abl)RESS ................................. U70 .. m.`-A, ---- Ejghway .. 99 ...................................................................... i�!D-_ W_NER.:.� ....... Bob.r-961.z .............................................................. CONTRAC1T0:'B ..... B ... & ... 14 ... Qonlrax�lors ............... : ............. kpril-24 ....................... 19:.6.4, for .................. to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer v-Perinission Is-itanted ... :1 Ci�j.--'sewers-In" accordance with application on file and governing ordinances. EN�iON - IS CALLED TO - THE FOLLO "WING: de Sewer Contractor. must omkners of the property may obtain. a permit to construct,. sewer inside pr6perty line. A licensed, St be. employed to construct side sewer in street -area.. Do not cover 'any portion of. sewer before It 'has been inspected. 14OTF No. 2—Obtain.-ful I- information . regarding 9rdinance 11.16.030.and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit. NOTE No. 3—Top.9f..side sewermust have at least 30 Inches coverage at prope�ty,line and 12 inches Inside property line; minimum grade. of 2 No bends-in.grade sharper than % will be permitted. '§OTE N 1) 1 -for o. 4—Trenches,in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be res onsib e failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. NOTEiNo., 5--, It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than to provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the maln',sewer or Its ap-_ purtenances except to Insert the pipe into the wye. C-ITY'-OF. EDMONDS NtkR WATER -SEW Ca4l. PROsPect- 6-1107 when work ER DEPARTMENT 194eady for Inspection. (No�.Jnsp6c_ 0 tions-Saturday, Sunday. or.h611 EWER- PERMIT 1243 -SIDE S 12-70--H* h A]I?DRESS ......... ................... ?�&..��C�Y P6*- 99 .................................................................................................. .................... ............ OWNER ............................ ............ CONTRACTOR ..... B ... &.:-R --- Cont ractors ............................ 'Vermission is granted ...... �141!e ... 11 ...... 1 19..5.5.1 for .� .................... da ys, toREPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer with 61ty Sewers In accordance with application on file and governing ordinan CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: OTE Rb. 1—The owners of the prbperty.may obtain a Permit to construct sewer Inside property llne.� A licensed Side Sewer Cont tor must be employed to construct side sewer in:street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before It has beew inspected. me No. 2—Obtain -full. Information regarding Ordinance 11. 16.030, and Reg tons governing side sew ers when you get permit. ula I 0 �—Top of side, sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and 12 inches Inside property line; minimum grade of 2%. No . bends in grade.sharper than 'A will be permitted. NOTE, No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surfae of street restored to original condition, Contractors shall - c fallbre due to Improper wor e be responsible for k which may dev lop within one year of completion. K NOTE No; 6--It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than Is provldd,�d for in the permit, or to do any work. on the main sewer or Its ap. purtena6ces. except to Insert the pipe Int:43 the wye. -City;.-OVEDMONDS :.,Cali -,PR., ec� --6-1107 when' work CIUY�kC CENTEX WAtER-SEWER'-DEPARTMENT Ii. r". 10"Pr In t spee ton. olinsp6o .0 tIons_ Sa�prday, Sundav-or.'holl '038 'MIT SIDE- E WER PER' DA SS* . ........... 12 E 70...rn..B ...... High��ay-:-9-9 .................... ............ ..... M.1 ...... ........... . ............. .................................... OWNIPR: .......... ...Rblz ..... .......... 7,ro� .............. .............. CONTRACTm ..... ... M.-_Cqn.tr.qctoi;s.. ......................... *.. 19..6 ":,REP P�rfiilsslon Is granted ............. April...2.4 ......... _.._.41,.,,.for ....................... _,,days;., oi'.-CONNECT a, side sewer witiv'Cit", y,:Sewers..n accor ance with application on file and. goVerning-ordInilinces.-I - -IS CALLED TO THE'FOLLOWING- ATTENTION -NOTE.No. -1—The'owners of the property may obtain a p6r-ml( to-,c e property -line. - A. licensed . Side- Seiver Contractor must onstruct, sew. r. Inside CJIFGROUP FOUR, Inc. 19502 - 56th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 FAX. (206) 362-3619 (206) 775-4581 - (206)k3q2;-42 4-- VF _D LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: !L A444-.2zal (��/ 7- e5�O /J1.0 X)CL.5 WE ARE SENDING YOU: 0 Shop drawings F-]Specifications F1 Xprints 0 Copy of letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: F-]For your approval 7 Approved as noted a 0 FOR BIDS DUE FEB 24 1989 .1 DATE FNII� WLY-9JOB NO: RE: oe Z-2 6-7 originals Change order For review and comment As requested 6q,7- <7-52-5- Samples Plans �-4or your use 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOANED TO US REMARKS 7;f 4!5- - /2C-76) 7-6 ,Z�6c-2 Y 1;�X ke6C-- e-- A-,L) /tZ/e5) 7 (e -6 4-Z 1",!t5—,o1V T�> COPY TO SIGNED SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT .0P r (D,) Z 0 W V) U C4 0 U� CITY OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT T Rri A. * Owner: Wash1MtopJNgVra1 Gas Company B. Contractor: Nlailin dress eatjA A P W,49WRII City State Zip Permit No. -I -L *-' Date Name Mailing Address City State zip., State License Number. Telephone -Number C. * Address or Vicinity of Construction: Type of Work to be Done: Ins taAV&M&&W'CWeM/ se-4 Vice: D. 0 Work in Connection With: 0 Sub or Plat El Single Family E) City Projects 0 Commercial 0 Multifamily )kUtility E. 0 Pavement Cut: 0 Y Jq N F. 0 Size of Cut: - X SIPT APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any,kind-or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may 04 �' I be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or empio'YeAl including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court cosks. and- tt ey/fees by reason of granting this permit. Cd 711111 . THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS -FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCEOF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time adebit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration, to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available. at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: M%�� Owner or Contractor Date: Ju�y 30, 1991 This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For < Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: —RU/ Time Authorized: Void after days. Special Conditions: PERMIT FEE: Restoration Fee: Receipt No.: — Fund I I I Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: RELEASED BY: t6Y_02�_ Date ?,—);;Z—q INSPECTED BY NO WORK TO BEGIN, PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Date Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund I I I Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: 0 CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION 0 YES 0 NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July GaMWO7 AW-4ngbn&,OWCarp&V Addendum to City of Edmonds Right of Way Permit Application Submitted by: Kerry Walsh Engineering Aide Washington Natural Gas �XZZ�7 2, Pc, 622-6767 x2761 pager 995-6914 ��'WNG to window d�'Water main depth unknown PA 11 gas mai Qb arr�; —W— WdLer -g- gas -ss- sewer -e- water hydrant 0 water valve 815 Mew4w St. (P.O. BOX 1869). Seattle, WA 98111 (206) 622-6767 IT S. ZVI' riod If' r T,W IL n Q3 . is. . w., TO IF, 1M Exh CG2 F. CL-&- Zh; -MT-51F CG2 '* c. .1k W�. 7 R-2-89 Ikegami Exhibit 6:, CG2 CG2 7* 87akET rilz; CITY OF EDMONDS 1L. 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works - Planning 9 Parks and Recreation * Engineering 8 90 . 199 November 11, 1989 Doug Ikegami Doug's Lynnwood Mazda 22130 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA. 98020 Dear Doug: LARRY S. NALIGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Per our discussion earlier this week, the Engineering Division has agreed to approve your job for final occupancy with the following two conditions: 1. Your contractor will attempt to "soften" the affect of the footprints in the sidewalk along Highway 99 either through grinding or chemical treatment, or both. 2. The two curb cuts on Highway 99 are starting to crack, and rather than take them up and repour them now, your contractor can wait until spring and repour them. This work is to be done under the one-year workmanship guarantee he had with you. If you have any further questions, feel free to call me at 771-3202. Very truly yours, a DAN SMITH Engineering Inspector DS/sdt Albetts DOUGSMAZ/TXTST530 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 9 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan RF.C:EIVED VANCE TESTING & SERVICE DEC 1 8 1691 PUBLIC WORKS DE��' P.O. Box 1485 Everett, Washington 98206 e Pager: 339-8998 or (206) 337-4175 BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEM TEST REPORT FIRM NAME ADDRESS 2-2- A-ZO ',f9 ZI SERVICE ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON PHONE F] Reduced pressure backflow assembly [��Double check value assembly F]Pressure vacuum breaker assembly Date Installed Assembly: Make Model Size Serial No. LOCATION OF ASSEMBLY LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST PSI PRESSURE DROP ACROSS #1 CHECK Z-- PSI Reduced Pressure Assemblies Pressure Vacuum Breaker Double Check Assemblies Relief Air Inlet Check Valve Opened at 1 st Check 2nd Check Valve psid psid I-,' Initial DC -closed tight Closed Tight Opened at Did not Test RP- - psid Leaked psid open F-1 Leaked Leaked E] Repairs and Materials Used Test After DC -closed tight Ej Closed fight Opened at Opend at psid Repair RP-- psid psid psid AIR GAP INSPECTION Remarks: Tested by: Repaired by: Final Test by: minimum air gap separatoo provided Yes 7 No Cert. No. Date: ZZ-2- 2Z Cert. No. Cert No. Date: Date: I certify the above test has been performed: Contact person Date: BUILDING DIVISION TELEPHONE/VISIT RECORD �7- 1� �;� -, i L DATE E TIME COMPA PERSON CALLED A00arj>fl� NY I"n,12&4 -77'1- 363-1 TELEPHONE # —PROJECT RE: _ T jjk-egj,,m1' S,4 X+al 041,41101Z �0246W &m,,bld - 'Y,"l lallae AD APdblble I 4,,vd d& IC lq�O t"-e4 IM 41 /,1/ 01'/ 7�k& �1,4CAV7 V-, Ale - no LE COMMENTS: ;�l5 04fs- 1-r-6 71-- CALL TAKEN BY: iz- 6ep� VISIT DATE PROJECT SUBJECT FILE COMMENTS: CITY REPRESENTATIVE: TIME � LOCATION WHOM/COMPANY The City of Edmonds i , I - APPLICATION CARD No . ...................................... for SME SEWM PERNIrr OUTSIDE 0 INSIDE 0 REPAIRS 0 EASEMENT No . ................................ OWNERR.. . ..... 6 ......... . .. CA . . ................................................................... ... CONTRACTOR. .................. ...... ......... PERMIT No. STREET HOUSE No - ---------- ------------ -- .......... AVENIM LOT No. i ....................................... ---------- .............. BLOCK No. NAMEADD . ................................................... A Date BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISST_TED ----------------------------------- DEPOSIT, SEV%r� WOPLK ORDER ISSXTED ----- .QW A� Xz CO APPROVED PR �;4 1964 jjjj� Approved: DATE ------------------------- 0 -------------- By ----------- .!�2 0 7 KI APPLICATION CARD No. for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PIWJM OUTSIDE El INSIDE 0 REPAIRS EASE31ENT No. e.,o OWNER ----- (*� . . ......... IS .............. CONTRACTOR ---- --- ------ - ------------------ PERAUT No. STREET .............. HOUSE No - ------------ ------------------- ...... AVENUE DOT No. ----------- BLOCK No . .................... NA31EADD . .................................................................. ----------- 2.2.1 io -, ylc-114.4y if —I Date Approved: BACIMLL WORK ORDER ISSUED ----------------------------------- DEPOSIT, $ ................... .................... SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED � ................... ............ __ e �* - .... DATE -�/ .. �/,: — --- — 330y .... .. .... I ............ ------- --------------- - Do APPLICATION CARD No . ....... . ............ ................ for The city of Edmonds SMIC SEVVIM PIM&MMT OUTSIDE INSIDE REPAIRS Q EASEMENT No . ............................... . ..... OWNUR ... 4-> - -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR --------- B ... . ... h ....... . ...................................... PERMT No. STREET HOUSE NID.../.2 ..................................... o. B1,OCK No . ......... .... ............................. 4-.y ..... f -.T --------------------------------------- AVMTUE LOT N -- - ---- NAMEADD . ...................... -------- z ----- -------- ---------- - --------------------------------------------------------------- APPR JUN I BACEFELL WORK ORDER ISSU SL'WER WORK ORDER ISSUED 3t f a�# 4 A r — Approved: DEPOSIT, $ --------------------------------------------- DATE ----- 0 Parcel I I bming,"$A feet 9"th of Northwest Career of of S s, tim Im last 141 tests, theme North 121 tests tim-M West 107 Awto ti-ents' South 46 fast thence West 130 test thence South 75 test to the true point of beglanings, LIESS West 30 foot for Read a Parcel 2 1 North 124 feet of Wj of SW j of Wj of. SWJ LISS Road.. Parcel 31 The South 13 feet of that 1:rtlen of the east half of the southwest quarter of t nortMast.juarter of the soutlaftst Iluefter of Section 29. Township 17 N E.W.M. as north of the following deserlbad lines Inning a a po at on the west line of $tate, Road 160 1, 12$ fast measured along the weiscerly' line of sold Road) w�wt"tarly frm the north line of said "st half of the southwestwarter of the northmst quarter of the sowthwbst qu Orter running OL-- parallel to the north Ilive of sold sambdlvl$lon to th*'�W*t lln*' thereofi, Exsept State Ito" No. All of the for"olng Pan*le,, 1. 1 and 3. being located In Sect lon.- 29. Towsh I p, 27 North, Unp i4 I, Doug Ikegami, do hereby agree to maintain and adequately clean all storm drainage and water retention systems, located at 22131 Hwy 99 North, Edmonds, WA., as referenced in the Edmonds Community Development Code. I will perform inspections at 90 day intervals, and will grant permission to the City of Edmonds to perform inspections as needed. I agree, that in the event the City of Edmonds deems it necessary, I will allow the City of Edmonds to do any and all required cleaning after which I will reimburse the City of Edmonds for all reasonable costs for the required cleaning. ,,4Yougl4:E( Ikeg-ami- '�V SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day of &e-C, _, 1988. xL,� /110TAR1K,-,PUBT-IC in and for the State of...- in n, residing in cc: Steve Anderson Group 4 Engineering 19502 - 56th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 I, Doug Ikegami, do hereby agree to maintain and adequately clean all storm drainage and water retention systems, located at 22131 Hwy 99 North, Edmonds, WA., as referenced in the Edmonds Community Development Code. I will perform inspections at 90 day intervals, and will grant permission to the City of Edmonds to perform inspections as needed. I agree, that in the event the City of Edmonds deems it necessary, I will allow the City of Edmonds to do any and all required cleaning after which I will reimburse the City of Edmonds for all reasonable costs for the required cleaning. P6jzglas--'Ikegami a SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day of 1988. NOT f IC i-fL and for ;L-.iie StaLe AR' 0 WaA j�Zon, residing in A� cc: Steve Anderson Group 4 Engineering 19502 - 56th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 I, Doug IkegarrLi, do hereby agree to maintain and adequately clean all storm drainage and water retention systems, located at 22131 Hwy 99 North, Edmonds, WA., as referenced in the Edmonds Community Development Code. I will perform inspections at 90 day intervals, and will grant permission to the City of Edmonds to perform inspections as needed. I agree, that in the event the City of Edmonds deems it necessary, I will allow the City of Edmonds to do any and all required cleaning after which I will reimburse the City of Edmonds for all reasonable costs for the required cleaning. a kegaM3- a SUBSCRIBED and SWOInt before me this 2, --)� day of 1988. Je eo_c� C TOOTARY PUBL-, Jj� and for the State... L. L' of Was gton, residing in cc: Steve Anderson Group 4 Engineering 19502 - 56th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 'goo J RECEIVED A & R EDUCTOR COMPANY INC. 15004 35TH AVE. W. LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 743-4396 November 28, 1988 Group Four Inc. 19502 56th Ave Lynnwood Washington 98036 ATTN: Steve 'Anderson Dear Sir: In response to your question on whether we can clean and access multiple tubes thru 48" manholes, the answer would have to be Yes. The majority of Storm Sewers we clean are 48" manholes or smaller, varying from 4' to 25' deep. As long as the access to the tubes is 30" or more, a man can access any vaults or tubes. Most all pipe less than 54" is cleaned with high pressure hoses and does not require entering the tubes with personnel. Even with the hindrance of restrictors or oil seperators there are no problems cleaning 48" structures. Most all cleaning equipment of today needs only 10" to work in and a man can access with 24" from any end. We clean all over the state and find mainly 48" structures. If you have any cleaning requirements please feel free to call us for a proffessional job well done. Very Tr 1 (1ka, U- Curt Redwood, Manager A & R Eductor Co. PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROJECT .DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE E Y a C6Y of EDMONDS BLIVESS LICtNSE APPLICATION Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 9 City Clerk Phone 775-2525 TYPE OF BUSINESS 0 (A) HOME OCCUPATION D AID LICENSE NO. ANNUAL FEE $15.00 AI:TF:DPFR 1q $ 22.50 qSTRUCTIONS: 6�, 1 Y X El (B) BUSINESSWITH $20.00 $ 30.00 All items must be completed RECEIPT NO. DATE PAID PRINT'X' A� 1 TO 3 EMPLOYEES or application will not be ac- IN SPEC. BOX (C) BUSINESSWITH $22.00 $ 33.00 cepted. = 1 '11 1 1 FOR ISSUE OF X_ 4 TO 9 EMPLOYEES FEE PAID PENALTY PAID CORRECTED E3 (D) BUSINESS WITH 10 $75.00 $112.50 Sign and return application LICENSE WITH OR MORE EMPLOYEES with fee. Renewals received I LC'ACTION. NEW APPLICATION (LA) after February 15 must pay �n" RENEWAL (LB) penalty in addition to fee. NEW BUSINESSES AFTER 0 CHANGE (LC) JULY 31, 1/2 FEE. (PLEASE MAKE ANY NECESSARY CHANGES) 0 DELETE (LD) NAME OF FIRM BUSINESS PHONF�. OF EMPLOFES. - - /7- _z" C_ S 7 - 5.93 ,j MAILING ADDRESS NATURE OF BUSINESS 2260 Awei 77 Ct:T F1WM04Wj 445 4 -7-rcpAo I --- BUSINESS ADDRESS INDIVIDUAL PARTNERSHIP QORPORATION Is'l) - (S) T) (C) OWNERS NAME HOME ADDR SS V/ & om SIMP150#1 X1 V� /,� HOMEPHONE DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIPTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER r-IY2 Z #r ? :f5-0/,7 3 0/,;7 1 9-35- q If - I r. A .17. EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION (1) NAME&TELEPHONE (PLEASE LIST TWO) (2) NAME & TELEPHONE WASHINGTON STATE TAX NO, APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE STAFF REVIEW: FILL IN LAND USE CODE, LIFIR NUMBERS, ZONING, ETC. CHECK APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL, DATE, AND SIGN. IF DISAPPROVAL, PLEASE COMPLETE "COMMENT" SECTION. ROUTE TO NEXT DEPARTMENT ON LIST. PLANNING DEPARTMENT i DATE 0 APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE SIGNATURE COMMENTS BUILPING DEPARTMENT � j DATE 9-APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE SIGNATURE 1,A COMMENTS: CAPACITY: (NO. UNITS, APTS. OFFICES, SEATS, BEDS, STUDENTS) LAND USE CODE ZONING CODE I I I I I C/ 16� I 1 :1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ETI Building 0 Hotel/Motel (L) Permit 0 Apt. Bldg, (A) 0 Office Bldg. (0) Occupancy 0 Restaurant (R) Group 0 Hosp/Nurs Home (H) 0 School (S) F!PE DEPARTMENT DATE 4— U.F.I.R. e) APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE SIGNATURE Y 7 COMMENTS: PO ICE DEPARTMENT SIGNATURE �ftAPPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0 APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE DATE SIGNATURE NTS: PLEASE RETURN TO CITY CLERK -zr 00 CD CITY of EDMONDS For Inspection Call 771-3202 Address of Construction: FiECUVED NOV 2 2 1988 W pp LIC 0' S 21019 //9W S I*1D �.!S E. WE Rl P E R-Mil P MIT N 006 ER Property Legal Description (Include all easements): - Owner and/or Builders,�/06_'s A,"A Contractor& License No: Faj,�V_�000 9/V FILI, Singl:e Family Residence VIA BALLINGER Multi-Fam.ily (No. of Units LIFT STATION Commercial (No. of fi'xtur"e Units Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) /14/ sv�P,7 Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLXEASE.EAD THE'ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK certify that I have read and shall comply lzk�Oate/ with the items listed on the back. Aw A A A Awl A A A A Permit Fee: 30.00 Trunk Charge: 2-5. 00 Assessment Fee:. 1ssued By: IDate Issued: 11-21-08 Receipt No.: 17(ac 7 Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: I wl(_ '-JDate Initial Rejected: Reason _ff -a t _e Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** ,Wh.ite Copy - File Green Copy -'Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant Hecelved: 11/27/ 0 4:30PM; 4112712000 16:28 5039668588 5099668588 DWINELL'S; Page 2 PHIL FRANKLIN PAGE 02 November 27, 2000 STRUCTURAL-PIVIL ELECTRICAL Rc:Doug's Lynnwood Mqk- C E I V E D Wz P-92 Pylon 4" DEC 1 4- 2000 JRnbal so o NGI�E:E: ING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.' RANKI-IN k ialt 3 CITY OF EDMONDS 0. PHILIP FRANKLIN. P-1. Itegister*d EUBWW Phone: 7 Nodh 42nd Avenue yeWma. WA 98W& 96"W RECEIVED 1)wimll's Visual systems C7_%C` 12 2000 1112 East Nob Hill Blvd.. ENGh-irEERING DIVISION Yakima, W-A 98901 Gentlemen: I have reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. 1 find that the installation will meet applicable Str=tu'r�l provisions of the UBC. Sincerely, -AS JD. Philip Franklin, P.E. 0 7404 NAL X�PJ�R S �'RecelVed: 11'/.27/ 0, 4:31PM; 5099888588--> DWINELLIS; Page 3 PAG E 03 111/27/2000 16:28 5099668588 PHIL FRANKLIN . 'TO FOQTIWG pOLF, ANv CONCRZ Date 11127A002 14r Lq'lp .4 7. da Project rvsLme__ /,J e (Ca It I 44P 7w a 0/5- 't 0,4. DescriPtiDn Wind loadin Af P-1 e �Fzf J: �.Y., In Kip -feet 2 ) ? CS(ft) YX Lcadlng Cn 12 V 2� ),2,07 Of zxn- P,0 e 2 7 .7 3 r -J.3 I Totlls pole size If .fy !4 section mo dul'as f D b -7 kip Requ ired D.L.M-= W L . 4', � "X te x Try concre weight Sign C)J kir-s Weight P010 /I Ll Weight cono tit. kip-ft. Total wt- . J: kips wt Ft. ez, - - 7 2 0 e147 wt _-Lail P 9) (�. 7s) rroa x ir 4 6 x3- W .,.fli27/2000 16: 8 099668588 PHIL FRANKLIN PAG'.E. 01 ` BMW.—. FAC-51MILE CuNik;ft SllF;6T sy"Tum Cr4iL ELECTP COM PANY /IZ - - Can 4 4/ 7- 7 7# f4� na gin ickiNGME 114G PHONE; RANKLIN FAX------------ -j�-mjjLjjP MANKLIK P-L No. of sliev4s iricluding coverY No" 42nd A"f*A 4P CJ Ir GROUP FOUR, Inc. 19502 - 56th Avenue West - 206 775-4581 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 April 15, 1988 Edmonds City Council City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA. 98020 Re: Doug Ikegami Rezone Group Four Job No. 87-4525 Dear Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to address the concerns raised over this proposed rezone at the Planning Board meeting held on March 23rd. Three main issues were raised at that meeting. The issues were noise, traffic volume utilizing the access onto 76th Ave. W. I and overall iT�pact on adjacent existing residential uses. The issue of noise was raised under the context of impacts from automotive service taking place on the site. However, in reality a problem does not exist, for two reasons. First, the City of Edmonds has an adopted ordinance which sets allowable limits for noise generation. These limits could be monitored and strictly enforced by City staff on this project. Secondly, all vehicle service would take place within the proposed new main building located in the central portion of the site. By virtue of the location of the building in relation to surrounding residences and the fact service would take place inside the building, noise impacts would be mitigated. The second major impact discussed was that of traffic impacts from those vehicles utilizing the secondary access onto 76th Ave. W. Mr. Ikegami, based on his experience at his current dealership which is located with frontage on Highway 99 and 68th Ave. W. in Lynnwood, feels that a secondary access onto 76th Ave. W. is essential to provide customer service access. This access would be for customers only and would not be utilized by convoy vehicles or other truck traffic since these large vehicles could not negotiate access to the western portion of the site due to the tight turning radii and limited width on the access road between 76th Ave. W. and the western portion of the site. In anticipation of the concerns over the perceived impact of the 76th Ave. W. access, we engaged the services of Transportation Planning and Engineering (TPE), of Bellevue, to prepare a traffic analysis. The results of this study were issued in January 1988 and a supplemental letter SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT Page 2 Edmonds City Council/87-4525 4-15-88 was prepared on March 4, 1988 which addressed concerns raised by City staff in their review of the original report. on page 5 of the January report, TPE concludes "the traffic volume expected to use the 76th Ave. W. driveway are so low that turn lanes or other traffic control improvements will not be needed." Further, in their March 4th letter they state "The proposed driveway will essentially intersect 76th Ave. W. within the existing 76th Ave. W./222nd St. S.W. tee intersection. The slight offset of 12 feet north of the 222nd St. S.W. centerline is better than an offset to the south would be, considering the turning paths required for left turns. The proposed driveway is expected to carry fewer than 20 vehicles during the peak hour, an average of less than one vehicle every three minutes. Due to the low volume nature of the proposed driveway, we expect it to operate well." Considering the limitation on the type of vehicles which can utilize this access and based on the results of the TPE analysis, we feel this secondary access will operate well and be of minimal impact on adjacent properties. Finally, the general overall impact of the proposed project, beyond noise and traffic, was discussed at the Planning Board meeting. The issue of visual impact for residences on the west side of 76th Ave. W. was raised. To that I would respond by stating that since approximately 130 feet of the existing RM-2.4 zone would remain between this commercial project and the residences west of 76th Ave. W., when this remaining multi -family. parcel develops the visual impact would be the same regardless of whether or not the rezone is granted. if the rezone is granted residents would still look across 76th Ave. W. to a multi -family development. In the interim, until the remaining multi -family parcel is developed the visual impact of the commercial development would be mitigated by the retention of the stand of trees lying west of the most westerly existing building. The issue of landscape buffers was also discussed at the Board meeting. on the conceptual site plan presented at that meeting a 5 foot buffer was proposed along the south side of the existing western building. The plan has been modif ied as you can see on the attached plan to create a 15 foot buffer in this area, which now complies with City code. In conclusion, I would ask that in your review of this proposed rezone application you review the attached conceptual plan as just that, a concept only. As you are aware, final SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT Page 3 Edmonds City Council/87-4525 4-15-88 site plan approval will be issued by the Architectural Design Board which will insure that the final site plan complies with the pertinent City codes and ordinances. Thank you for your consideration in reviewing this issue. I will be available at the April 19th hearing to answer any additional questions you may have. S incerely, Group Four, Inc. A;e-,) awz�� , Steven M. Anderson Project Manager Encl. SA/lq SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT *rhe City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION 0' REPAIRS M LID NO . ................ .--ASMT. NO . .................. 0,05— .3 OWNER .... D�?-Lk,5-5 ---------- -491 --------------------------------- CONTRACTOR ------- ---------------- ----------------- PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS L q ��-1-3-0 -------- ---- -------- - ------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------- kr LA lo q II)AQ, P, - io C, NAMEOF ADDITION ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ VIA BALLINGER B-"LL� LIFT STATIONL] te`pyr- CA 4-'D,9.z,0. 1, 0 [ ; . --r 1 3" 4j 14 "Pilo- t All co Poe- 4t) g, 0— I a 1 10 S8 1c) (",Pvc 6,11D W440- k� '"P \j 000 Approved: t DATE 2.:Al ..... j - --------------- By ...................... CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN 250 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR DATE: -ZAAJU.-+9y1 2,00 /f&7 FILE NO.: PROJ. NO.: TO: 7,—e,,9A15,v. 2/o/ 112 v-4 A-11C vue TRANSMITTING: &E7 As you requested For your information >d' As we discussed For appropriate action For your file For posting in public place For signature and return REMARKS: ZOe a Sig' .5W In, PUBLIC VVORKWRANSMZT/TXWQAk% PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING A46 '�,")TCIR VF11CLE T RAFF Ir ACCIDENTS RY LOCATION CITY nr EnmoNlns, *A I I A(r I n'7NT S* D A r, r q FOR THE DFP lOn ol-ol , 19137 lHRU 06-30,11)P7 rprntj,�-m AY (crrronl, SFrTtr.,-,]) W. p. - TRAr-FICWAY PRIMARY DIST. ovt. REFERENCE Sr-CotinARY1 Tc'AFFICW&Y AMT. NO. NO. NO. TYPE- f%F ACCjnFtjT DATF T T'4F nAy pf) �D LIGHT sFrnNnhRy2 P.n. IllJJ KIL V�H Pin/nA/YF cokir). CoNn 220 SW RO AV W 'P 750 0 r �.:i Fr Y t1r, A T ANII, L E. 0513R7 121)0 wrn WF T nK-SL-O�f 270 SW 80 V W 1 q5o 1 0 2 5.01R-BnTH eTP-nNF '-,Tnp-' P F D.�,i_6 7 0946 S AT WET OAYL ITE 3950n .0 0 2 FNT.FPlNr. AT ANGLE 0.5 308 7 0934 SAT DRY _Q AY-L.1 T __E_ 220 Sw R4 AV w 30o 1 0 2 S.OIP-RnTH STP-r.KIE STOP-PF1211987 2310 mn.4 WET DK-Si -nN Zia sw 84 AV W 0 0 _2__� A -ANG TEP14�' LE 4 87 1770 SAT DRY nAYL ITF W 600 0 0 ? S.DIP-ROTij STP-nNE STnP-PE05�187 1540 THU DRY DAYLITE 220 —77-220-' Sw 7 6 AV W 3,200 n 0 1 1 0131A7 1744 SAT WET nK-SL-ON SW 0040F E 76 AV W DIR-BOTH STP-ON_ Tdp-RF072OS7 21?0 FPI FIRY DK-SL-ON 226 sw BETWEEN 76 AV W 7 a P t W 2t2OO 1 0 2 rNE --...-V-Fm LEAVINr DRIVEVAY 013097 0748 FRI DRY DAYL ITE 220 SW 0 02 Fl F W 77 PL W 1.7no I 0 2 nt,'F VEH PAPvFf'-(7NF Mr-V 067IP7 OA15 Tllr DRY nAYL IT E 220 SW BETWEEN 099 76 AV 1 5 5 0 aTILIT �A I �47 2 4 �SF K I n �QY 224 76 AV W 0 0 0 1 0 2 ENTERING AT A N r L E ;)121$37 1245 WED nRY DAYL ITE 228 SE q AV SE-- 0 1 0 1 rnLLISInN WITH SICYC.1j: 0675A7 1350 THU DRY DAYL I TE 010OF F q2 0 1 CCILU�FON _WYTA Bi—&-c—LE 020287 1630 MON WET nAYLITE ibr 011OF W -76--AV 0 1 TREE OP. STUMP (STATIONARY) 040987 0130 THU WET OK -NO -St. 236 AV W 79 AV w 49000 0 0 2 r,.nIP.-6nTH STP-RnTH MOV-SI.;(122P07 I A30 SAT WET f)K-SL-ON .236- SW olooF F �UROPA AV 1.792 1 0 2 VNF VFH ENTEPTNG DRIVEWAY 021787 1615 TUF DRY DAYLITF 236 SW 19600 0 0 1 OTHER OBJECTS 1500 SAT DRY DAYLTTE 236 SW 76 w 11500 1 0 2 S.nIR-fk0TH rTR-nNF STnp-PF0126e7 IA0% MON WE T OK-SL-ON 238- SW 78 AV W 1 __Odi 6" i P6-ER , ETC 1 03 GTILITY W 2887 OA?9 SAT DR Y nAYL TT E SW 800. .0. ..ONE-.V-EH LEAVTNn DRIVEWAY 0 WET DAYLITE 244 76 AV 650 0 0 2 ONE VFH LEAVING DRIVEWAY 011587 Oq3O Tol DRY 0AYt ITE 244,SW 050OF E HWY -199 650 0 0 ------ Vi- WA Y 040397 i_0_a_E__VE_H 1215 FRI W ET DAYL IFE 3 AV N 0075F. N MAIN -3.0. D. 0 .. .... �O_ ...2__0NE__VEm PAPKEn-CNE MOV n10887 0700 THU DRY DAWN 3 AV S 020OF N ELM 450 0 0 2 ONE VEM PARKEn-cNE MOV 04?487 1610 FRI nRY' DAYLITE :5�,AV S' q 0021F�,. N :ELM -WAY 4.65F 1 0 —oNE VEH1�A*�jF* -ONE Mnv 050287 2115-SAT DRY DK- L-oN A4 s 005OF* 'S ELM WY . -SE 4,000 0 0 2 ONE VEM ENTERING DRIVEWAY 021387 1810 FRI WET , DK-SL-;ON Im TRAFFICWAY zin SW 9 SW W 216 Sw 218 Sw W 220 220 2 2 0 AT SW 220 SWI 0 SW 220 Sw 220 SW ___22 _,Q_ S.W. 220 SW 220 SW .220 SW 220 SW 270 SW _220 SW 220 Sw 720 SW 220 SW 220 SW 2 24 Z4�_.SW MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS By LncAT ION CITY OF EDMONDS *ALL ACCIDENTS* PAGE 17 FOR THE PFRIOD 01-01,1986 THRU 12-31,1986 PREPARED BY (RECORDS SECTION) W. S. P. DIST. njR. TRAFFICWAY AMT . NO. NO. NO. TYPE OF ACCIDENT DATE T IME DAY ROAD L I GMT REFERENCE SFCONDARYI SECONDARY2 P.D. INJ KIL VEm MO/DA /YR COND. COMO. A4 AV W 3,200 0 0 3 ENTERING AT ANGLE 110186 0017 S AT DR Y DK-SL-OM 84 AV W 750 0 0 2 FNTERING AT ANGLE 111386 13DO THU WE T DAYL IT E 94 AV W 11000 0, 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 120586 0 1 845 FRI WE T DAYLITE T6 AV W 10000 0 0 2 S.DIR-snTH STR-ONE STOP-RE061886 IT44 WED WET DAYLITE 76 AV W 4vOOO 2 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 110186 0016 SAT DR Y DK-SL-OM 84 AV W 650 0 0 Z ENTERING AT ANGLE 921386 1430 THU WE T DAYLITE 0040F W HWY qq 1800 1 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY 120186 OT50 KOM WE T DAYLITE 96 AV 3FI 1 0 0 2 _S.D[R-BOTH STR-ONE STOP-RE112686 0845 WEO WET DAYLITE 010OF W 98 300 0 0 2 S.DIR-ALL OTHERS 021886 0830 TUE ICE UAYLITE 9 AV W 900 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 110586 1400 WED WE T DAYLITE 011OF W HWY QQ 425 0 0 2 ONE VEH ENTERING DRIVEWAY 110186 t4'50 SAT OR Y DAYLITE 90 AV W L/ 2 , 300 1. 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 04D486 1930 FRI DRY DK-NO-SL 90 AV W %/4,000 1. 0 2 ENT ER I NG AT ANGLE D40586 1331 SAT D;t Y DAYLITE go A V W /1,500 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 090686 lq2O SAT DR Y DA . YLIT . E 80 AV w J5075 1 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 112686 1944 WED WET_..DK-SL-0N 90 W /1,700 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 041886 1635 FRI WE T DAYLITE R4 AV W /l,qoo 0 0 2 FNTERING AT ANGLE 011186 0930 SAT WET- DAYLITE 76 A V W J-600 2: 0 3 S.DIR-BOTH STR-ONE STOP-RE111286 0823 1 WE 0 DR Y. DAYLITE 7A AVF W v/2 v 800 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 072486 2225 THU DRY DK-SL-ON 0250F W 76 W 900 1 0 3 S.DIR-BnTH STR-ONE STOP-RE062486 1710 TUE DR Y DAYLI Ti E 88 W Zv200 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 120886 1500 MON DRY DAYLITE OD50F W 099 VA*300 0 0 2 ONE vEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY 011186 1320 SAT DRY DAYLITE 0222F E 09Q VA,350 J) 0 2 ONE VEH ENTERING DRIVFWAY 020386 0855 MON DRY DATILITE 0040F W 099 1,500 1 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY 020686 1520 THU DRY _DATL IT E 0100F E 099 /-2,000 0, 0 2 S.DIR-BOTH STR-BOTH MOV-SS061386 0805 WED OR Y DAYLITE 450 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 043086 0720 WED DRY DAYLITE 0125F W 73 PL W 19000 1 0 2 ONE vEH ENTERING DRIVEWAY 062186 1815 THU DR-Y DAYL.ITE TFZAFFICWAY Pkl%�ARY 7 AV 5 73 PL W '_�E'4 fCL E TRtFF I C A Cr. IDENTS SY Lr'C4T I ON CITY OF EDMONDS *ALL tCC IDENTSA FnR THE PERICD 01-0191985 THRU 12-3191965 PREPARED BY (RECOFZOSS�CTIONI W. S. DIST. f)l:t. TRAFFICWAY AMT. KO. hC-. NO. TYPE OF ACCIDENT DATE TIME DAY REFERENCE SECONOAR Y 1 SECCNDAPYZ P.D. INJ KIL VEH YC/ CA /YR 010OF N CEDAR 3,000 0 0 2 ON E' VEM 'LEAV I N*G OR IV EW AY 020685 0855 WED 011.26F N 213 PL SW le500 2 0 1 VEH OVERTURNED I005E5 1639 SAT 0040F S 224 877 C 0 2 S.DIR-ALL CTFERS C21855 1600 MON PAGE P. ROAD COND. SNOW WET DRY 19 LIGHT COND. CAYL ITE DUSK DAYLITE 73 PL W 015OF S 225 19400 0 0 2 ONE:VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY C5C9e5 0610 THU DRY DAYL ITE 7 PL W JF i-9-5-6-0-0 0 2---S--. -C ... I _R_- 'A' _LL —0THE__RS C522E5 OS25 WE 0 DRY DAi-L I fE 76-,% V 0150F S 238 PL-/, 2t550 1 0 1 RETAINING WALL 010885 1055 TU E DRY DAYLITE --- )1-76 AV'W 020OF N 0LYvPiC VIEW OR -;K- 5,000 1 0 1 UTILITY POLE (POWER,ETC) 1123 TUE DRY DAYLITE 76 AV W 2C8 SW _0f_d_21_E_5_1_6_50_ff_0N _DR Y O"4YL I TE 76 AV W 015OF N 212 e_ 800 0 0 2 ONE VEH ENTERING DRI VE�%AY C416e5 2C15 THU WET OK-SL-ON t, 76 AV W 0150F N 212 SW 6t5OO 0 0 2 O.DIR-ALL CTFERS CIC3 S5 0636 THU ICE DK-SL-ON 76 AV W 0 0 5 4-F- 2 0 WE� ENfM�JG DRI —VEWAY LI. _76- AV W 0150F N 212 SW)g� 150 1 0 1 PEDESTRIAN-VEH- GOING STR C8.1385 17 35 TUE DRY DAYLITE 76 AV W 0040F S '212 SW -.1,800 0 0. 2 ONE VEH ENTERING DRIVEW 5 t'l .- -0N 76 AV W O-)8OF N 212 S 300 0 -6-2 O'NE�_V E H E N I E R I N G D R I V E _�_A _Y1 fid!065 _f _64 _0 TUI� WET sT -- DK ON �76 AV W OIZOF S 215 SW 2tOOO 0 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY C92785 -1415,)FRI DRY DAYLITE -76 AV.W---. 0 2 0 OF - S.". 215,.S,4,*.-:X--.,.. .700" 0:. 0 -2 ONE VEH LEAVING'.DRIVEWAY 12 04 8 5 Q1 45 5,�.. WED DRY DAYLITE 76 AV W 0150F N 216 SW _p( I 50 1 lcyr I r , �JL Q�-f uc --rr% A-;7-. 76 AV W 0060F N 216 S W 17800 0 0 **2 O.DIR-BO7H STR-GNE STOP-SSC60385 0613 MON DRY DAYLITE 76 AV W 0150F N 218 SW. �f- 1 400,.- 0-. 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING PARK'PrS. 043Oe5 1410 TUE DRY OAYL ITE AV W 040OF S 220 le76 AV W 020OF N 2_2 2 S W lt500 0 0 2 S-DIR-BOTH STR-CNE STOP-BEI00885 1725 TUE DRY OAYL ITE 76 AV W 050OF S :'228 SW 29000 0 2:.'.CNE VEH PARKED -ONE MCV 12C6E5 2238 FRI DRY OK--L-t)N W W -t: E-7-2 2 a _NW ZZI 5W __4W500��ON'E_ -VEH-U-AV-11�IG7-DP-IV-EWAY--10-0�r-e-5-T6!5--TU-E--WE�AY�L fYC—,- 76 AV W 025OF S 23 SW 2,700 0 0 2 ONE VEH ENTERING DRIVEWAY C41985 1949 FRI WET OK -SL-ON 76 AV W 0 10OF N 230. 1,600 .0 2. ONE VEH PARKED -ONE MCV VC685 1732' SAT DRY DAYLITE im-OF S 2305� _IO03____O___D___=0T MTY-FOUE-170W DR Y 76 AV W 020OF S 2 36 SW .800 0 0 1 TREE OR STUMP (STATIONARY) II30f5 0205 SAT ICE DK-SL-ON F OR THE PER I CD 0 1-0 1 , 1984 -1 HRU 12 -31 1984 PREPORED eY (FECOPOS SECTICK) W. S. -.TPAFFICWAY..--..- DIST. N'O.-TYPE...OF--bCCIDENT,--,--,---,,-,- . DATE T 1.*-,E. CAY ROAD LIGVT - PP. IMARV R EF ER ENCC SECONDARYI SECCNCARY2 P.D. INJ KIL VEF MC/CA/YR CCND. C 1) NO 22 C- .0 14 9F - E SR 99.. 030- -1. G� 1--UT I L I T Y POLE (PCwER, ET C) C8 12 84 0 225 SUN. DRY DK-SL-70-N 22C 0054F W 099 4, 300 1 0 2 ONE VEH ENTERING DRIVE�.Ali C81384 2143 M C K- DRY OK-SL-ON 2 Z 0 8 ET WE EN 099 NOT STATED 500 1 0 1 CCLLISION 'WITH. EICYCLE 0cYC6E4 1330 THU 00, Y DAYLITE AV ---.9CO.--O 2- 5 . 0 1 R- i3O 1.4 -GNE, STOP-PEC52284. --STR 1 -200 TUE WET_ --DAYLITE 220 SW 7 AV S 0 1 0 1 PEDESTRIAN-VEH TURN RIGHT C424E4 If00 TUE DR Y DAYLITE -,"220 51� 9 AV S 49000 0 0 2 O.DIR-ONE L.TURN-ONE STR 042784 1315 FRI DRY DAYLITE 22 C- Slo, 150E-- W.-SRI�9 2--- ON E VEH.. LEAVING OR IVEWAY- CA2664 1 11 5..T4 U DRY. DAYLITE 220 Sl% 040OF E HWY S9 floo 0 0 2 ONE VEH ENTERING DRIVEWAY C10284 1305 MON WET DAYLITE 22C 51- so AV W 500 0 0 2 S.DIR-BO7H STR-ONE STOP-PE123184 2CI5 MON ICE OK-SL-0?4 AV- W- 1012E!f �11,40 FRI. �E-T....DAYLITE 220 5�- 34 Irioc i 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE C11784 0850 TUE ICE DAYLITE 22C 5 34 AV W Y, 2,500 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 12 11 E 4 1 E5 5 TU E WET DK-SL-ON .—ZZO- ...... 12C4 WED I C E-- D AY L IT E 220 76 AV W 500 0 0 2 S.DIR-BOlH STR-GNE STOF-PE102084 2245 SAT DRY DK-SL-DN 220 S% 96 sw .2, 500 1 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE C6C5E4 CI;10 TUE DRY DAYLTTE —.22-0-5W. ---0 1 1-y-750-1--D —S . 0 1 R- BOjH--S TR7CNE-SjO R7 F E 0 5 01 84--1 7 5 5--TUE- WE T--D AYLTTE 220 5 W 010OF E 099 2,3CO 0 0 3 S.DIR-807H STR-CNE STOF-FEC716E4 1710 MON CRY DAYLITE V22 4 S. 76 6 1,500 1 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE C810E4 OS55 FRI DRY DAYLITE -----22 4-- -51----.0 300E—E---OT�. 510 EN C E- 2 1 8,�-- 1 c,25.-.FFt I -.DRX---�.DUSK- 227 F L SW 1,200 0 0 1 FENCE 1028E4 2227 SUN WET DK-SL-ON 228 ST SW 75 1,000 0 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY G50884 0620 TUE DRY D YLITE ----.-22 E.. 5 T- SW- A V---W- 3.7.5 0 Q-2-.-ENTERING-AT-A.NG.LE— -05-1884-..1-515--FR-I...DR.Y—D.AYL-.I-T,E—�-, 228 Sloi 011OF E SC AV. W 325 0 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY C215E4 OE25 THU WET DAYLITE 228 Sl% 75 AVE W 500 C 0 2 S.CJR-ALL CTHERS G223E4 1845 THU WET DK-NO-SL7,4 -Te-A V� _q .�a,.5-OD-�--O-�--�0.-2.--.ENTER.I.NG--AT--ANGL-E-.—. C 3 19.8 4- 0 64 5.. 238 SW 0350E- E CS9 400 0 0 2 ONE VEH PARKEO-C-NE MCV 110284 1700 FRI WET DK-SL-GN 240 ST SW BETWEEN 80 AV W 099 750 0 0 1 MAIL BOX C6C';84 0219 SAT DRY DK-SL-ON W SIR 159 (REV, I - 80) STATE OF WASHINGTON PAGE OF n POLICE TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT' 12TRAFFICWAY POLICE COMPLAINT NUMBER 1:1 PRIVATE WAY o (1 -3 o :1 DAII Of CO sl� lAY COIUSIOI�4 IME COUNTY COUNT Y NO, CITY NO. 7W—A -0 iu* -io 11 I-Ii.S. SAT. I USE 2.00 HOUR) A�CO "RAN OU AN 0 RURAL ON Of QIN CITY OR TOWN NAME & NO� OF STREET OR HIGHWAY FCT CLS ADM CLS PREFIX ROUTE OR S:T:RE�f SECTION MILES OS OW OOF % 5 -ION INTERSECTING WITH: STREET OR RO 0 NON INTERSECTION PREFIX POS T 7 4, � , /,,/ BETWEEN STREET & STREET JEQ. IMILE . DISTANCE 9 DIRECTION FROM REFERENCE. CROSS STREET OR NEAREST MILE POST ACCIDENT RAMP DIAGRAM DATA MILES N S E W MILEAGE FEET 0 0 0 0 OF CODE MIjfSIN HUNDRFDTHS COLLISION INVOLVED: SEVERITY: U NO. KILLED <- NO. INJURED 0 FPTLILAGE 0 HIT It RUN IN NON X.R0 INTER CLS CTING STREET OR ROAD OR REFERENCr- CROSS STREET OR ROAD TOTAL NO OF VEHICLES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONt Y o FIRE o STOIEN RESULTED VEHICLE I JINTER OBJECT STRUCK (NAME OF OBJECT STRUCK AND OWNER'S NAME) EST. DAMAGE SPECIAL CODING USE $ UNIT NO. I UNIT NO. 2 CrVEHICLE 0 PEDESTRIAN 0 PEDALCYCLIST ?4 DRIVER'S NAME: LAST FIRST MIDDLE DRIVER'SNAME: LAST FIRST MIbDLr_ . i�mc STREET STREET ADDRESS ADDRESS CITY CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NO. STATE ZIP CUDE PHONE NO. DRIVEIR'S DRIVER'S LICENSE NO. STATE SEX. DATE OT—BIRYH LICENSE NO. STATE SEX DATEOFBIRTH MO. YR, MO. DAY YR. -2 -vd /1. '1 I /DAY I V t OCCUPATION I OCCUPAT 19N FIRM NAME PHONE NO. EyllrIGH111111115111 FIRM NAME & PHONE NO. EYE 5 > IWEIGHTIHEIGHT INJURIES "��A50RIVIN(,ALQMMIERCIAL W R Vt�C Q.-CHECK (ol) 11 OPERAI ACOMMER(IAL VEHICLE AS AN EMPLOYEE OF ANOIHER. 0 CHECK VEHICLE AS AN EMPLOYEE Of ANOTHER. 27 0 S IR MO Ys 5 (ACTION Ty YCLI TfM 16 IAF'�ORC CODES P- + 13 c'N,.",'�' 4 RfS AINT ;: Ty IN I ;ORCY lyl MO CODES 01 Au��,Y 4 'TIAINI Ct( 1 3 Cl SAT TY 'M 1�� 15 fjfCIION 16 --7u-ffZF NA INJURIES NAIUI?tQF : , - -11 1�� 0IMOVfDFROM 0, PRIVAR NOT Sp 5( 1 Nf BY 0 AMSUkANCf 0 Po"C' 0 FIT' CAR COPIER V1.1CLE 0 IRAN VFMOVf FROM VfI.,A NOT 0 AMBULANCI 0 POT'" 0 C&T, - D "CII Q sCIf BY(,: CAR TRANSP yEH. YEAR MAKE (DODGE -CHEV.) MODEL I DART -NOVA) STYLE (2 DR. CONV.) v v EH. EAR CHEV.� MODEL (DART -NOVA) YLE(2DR.-CON�V_) 'Rom E IT-1 VEH. // m/j /_ / -/I- /.::� - :- TO VEH.COLOR tic ENSE PLATE NO. STATE NO, STATE COLOR tl(.tNbt FLA It NL). STATE TRAILER ATE NO. STATE 4 TRAILIR.1PLATE C L VEHICLE 29 3 VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. -7 1-7 11/ 1 1 �T-x' —1 /-?'1 )141 1 -�j 7; 1 51 1 51 1 I I I 5-111 Al (3 Z-1 1 '91 E ,0 cl REGISTERED OWNER: LAST FIRST MIDDLE PHONE NO. REGISTERED OWNER: LAST FIRST MIDDLE PHONE NO. W ADDRESS N /-o- ADDREFS OF OWNER OF OWNER 10 Z E 7, NAME & ADDRESS OF INSURANCE CO. OR AGENT INSURANCE W, WAGENT SHADE IN DAMAGED AREA dfH. DAMAGE CITATION A&ING D,S, NO. VFH, DAMAGE (D:D SABLINO SHADE IN DAMAGED AREA 2 3 1 10, 4 E)fu-CTl;Z' CHARGEr,,,,��,, CHARGE CD FUNCTIONAL- H Mr OL LISM—All 2 3 4 14 r EST. DAMAGE� DRIVEN REMAINED 11 DRIVEN NREMAINED AWAY TOWED AWAY TOWED 16 6i7l C"; AWAY BY: AWAY BY� DIAGRAM OF COLLISION: JUSIF SUPPLEMENTAL INDICATE NOR H DESCRIPTION OF COLLISION: (USE SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET If NECESSARY) T-If NEQ i $$A Y.) BY ARROW � UN_ 2f 36 A Ll _?7 38 .. ............. ]31 4" NAME, ADDRESS & INJURIES OF PERSONS INVOLVED + CODES - 6 (USE SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET OCCUPANTS/ WITNESSES FOR ADDITIONAL NAMES) __ I . 6 SEX A 1,T:Aliul 14 V, NO pos'l NJ CASS �45 �� , i_E� I C JATCY.' SAHTY NAff! PI 'HONE No ADDRESS NATURE OF INJUR E5 wtm()VED FROM 0 PO 0 Ro AMR. Nvcf 0 C(tpl,t, �t�V 0 NOTNSPF SCENE B�. R 0 IRA NAME* PHONE No. ADDRESS NATURE OF IN, ll�s REMOVED FROM 0 Potict 0 Hft.,R 0 PRIV ONO SCENE BY: Ams. CAR cop, I H TRAN5P, 40 4 NAME: P.�p No. ADDQf5S NATURE OF INJURIFS REMOVfD fROM 0 0 rp(,I,(.1 0 SCfN( BY AMR U Aii I I IINVE! NAME 9 RANK BADGE OR OIPIPORI DAI[�E XTTIGA71NGOFFIC[R'S X JAGENCY ID. NO. ST. JAPPPOVIDBY I STATE OF WASHINGTON SUPPLEMENTARY POLICE TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT PAGE 0 01`._�' Qp W SEVERITY OF COLLISION 11 FATALITY D. INJURY PROPERTY DAMA*GE ONLY 0 0 1. M 1 0 .. ..... DAY COUNTY CITY STREET, ROAD NUMBER OR NAME DATE OF I'LOCATION COLLISION 71,// 5 NAME NAMC' NAME DRIVERS vs DOZ-5�- 7 7 vs DESCRIm 10 (USE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHEN SPACE IS NOT ADEQUATE ON ORIGINAL REPORT OR AS A SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SHEET TO CORRECT DRIVER'S NAME, OCCUPANT LOCATION OR ANY DATA NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME THE ORIGINAL REPORT WAS COMPLETED.) e�) )Z:510 7 IDRIVER.ZPEDESTRIAN. NAME;, 5VOf IILOOD;��l A3ILfTY* NOT IMPAI�Ei El %I OJ COLLISION-: IF VI S. SHOW SKID' M'IARKS AND OTHE�� DRAW DIAGRAM OF COLLISION SCENE IN REASONABLE PROPORTIONS. PR6PE �Y I�EI7; Z" MEASUREMENTS. —7— -IJ, 71A, 7w INDICATE WITH NORTH AN ARROW 5'7 ........ .... ............. jVESTIGAIING OFFICER'S NAME AND RANK BADGE NO. JAGENCY UNIT/DISI. DET. APPROV �D BY I DATE OF REPORT 1012- 7 ol WSP-AR-13 (1-80) 1—— :,.. . I I TRIPLICATE A48 TRAFFICWAY PRIMARY 224 SW V-'2 2 4 S W 227 P L 227 PL SW PL Sw* 228 .22A SW SW 22R SW 7;! 8 Sw 228 SW 231 Sw 2-i2 S*W 2-3.4- SW 236 SW i3b'_ SW .23R Sw 241 SW 244 SW 244 SW -3 AV S 4 AV N 5 AV 5 AV 'S 5 AV S .524 MnTOR VF"ICLF. TOAFFIC ACC IOENTS BY LOCATION CITY OF EDMONns *ALL ACCIDENTS* PAGE is FOR THE PERion 01-01,1986 THRU 12-31,1986 PREPARED BY (RECORDS SECTION) W. S. P. DIST. DIR. 7RAFFICWAY AMT. NO. NO. NO. TYPE OF ACCIDENT DATE TIME DAY ROAU LIGHT PEFERENCE SFCONOARYI SECONOARY2 P.D. INJ KIL VEH mo/D&/YP COND. COND. OISOF w 7,, 300 0 0 2 VNE VEN EN7EPING DRIVEWAY 110486 2030 TUE WET DK-NO-SL 76 AV W 1,400 0 0 2 S.nlR-130TH STR-ONE STOP-QE04tl96 1604 FRI DRY DAYLITE' otaoF N Ro AV 410 1 0 1 VEH OVERTURNED 082486 0008 SUN DR Y DK-SL-ON 0060r N 227 400 0 0 2 ONE VEH PARKED -ONE NOV OT1986 2300 SAT DRY DK-SL-ON RETWEEM 7R NOT STATEU 323 0 0 2 ONE VEH PARKED -ONE NOV 071886 2330 FRI DRY OK-SL-ON 0030F F 75 500 0 0 2 ONE VEH PARKED-CNE NOV 082386 1200 SAT DRY DAYLITE q5 PL W 300 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 080786 1800 THU DRY DAYLITE aoqDF W Hwy 99 777 1 0 2 S.DIR-BOTH STR-ONE STOP-RE120786 1230 SUN DR Y DAYL ITE SO AV W 300 0 0 1 ROADWAY DITCH 061996 1900 THU DRY DAYLITE o I (i o F F 60 AV W t.000 0 0 1 FOADWAY DITCH 100686 1905 MON DRY DAYLtTE 76 AV w 3,300 2 0 2 ENTERING AT ANrLE 070186 1315 TUE WET DAy-L ITE 76 AV W 400 1 0 1 COLLISION WITH BICYCLE 101086 1855 FFt I DRY DUSK 004aF F 106 AV W 5.q5O 1 '0 2 ONE VEN PARKED -ONE MOV 120786 0005 SUN WET OK-SL-ON 0040F F 100 AV li 725 0 0 1 MAIL BOX 100986 0650 THU DRY OK-SL-ON 1 �20F W 76 W 500 t 0 1 PEDESTPIAN-VEH GOING STP 120386 1405 WED DR y OAYL ITE 7S AV w 19300 0 0 7 S.DIR-r)NE L.TURN-ONE STR 082286 1857 FRI DRY DAYL IT I- 76 AV W 19400 0 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 091286 1523 FRI DR Y DAYLITE 14 AV w 1,600 1, 0 2 ENTERING AT ANGLE 041286 1835 SAT OR Y. DUSK 76 AV w .2 t 500 0 0 2 S.DIR-ALL OTHERS 020586 1200 WED D;t Y DAYLfTE 76 AV W 3t500 0 0 3 ENTERING AT ANGLE 012986 1430 WED WE T DAYLITE 7& AV W 400 0 0 .2 S.DIA-BOTH STR-ONE STOP-RE042586 2305 FR I DR Y DK-SL-ON 0250F 5 MAPLE 1,800 o 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY 121386 1336 SAT WE T DAYLITE 009OF S FOMONDS 1 00 25 0 0 2 ONE YEN PARKED-CNE NOV 121TS6 1840 WED DRY OK-SL-ON BETWEEN WALNUT At DER 720 0 0 2 ONE VEH LEAVING DRIVEWAY 031386 1700 THU WE T DUSK 010OF N WALNUI Y� 21000 0 0 2 LINE VEH ENTERING DRIVEWAY 090386 -1410 WED DR. Y DAYL I TE 0036F N MAPLE )<- 340 0 0 2 ONE VEM PARKED.-CINE MOV 092286 1155 MON DRY OAYLITE 9 /,, 546 2. 0 2 S.DIR-BOTH _STR-BOTH MOV-RE050886 151.0 THU OR Y DAYLITE t2l sill It At �21 'VV6 f �14 &A. LIP Jut.. 40/24 ,A tq om - i N M Acci P 5tjT,5 3: -Y- DF4\JC-VJAY A-CLaD1C-kXT'z Ex / DY Ulm AS. E Ln .6 L! 1641 FIG zt: oo J 151W ie\q 0A I Z(O 10 1 4 13 —Mju;�'t-JL� 37/5Z t rnu P. I. 4-J (p 35 C—I LL"-jJ n , F. !1U'w S' S. 51AZ 51 jr .7 n PON i w wr (Yvi 54 - /31 4�o -roTkL.. -31 2 C31 it F IWO- r-.j 117 10 zq/19 Of Air VU ji 4, LQ h-1, -------- MULUM '&!GROUP FOUR Inc. 19502 - 56th Avenue -West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 FAX (206) 362-3819 (206.) 775-4581 - (206) 362-4244 A. "jJ-P t6 F - I T C?" ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 0 r.- --, - �-- --- 1. 11 HYDRAULIC REPORT AND CALCULATIONS EDMONDS MAZDA Lynnwood, Washington Group Four Job No. 87-4525 Prepared For: . Doug Ikegami 20700 Highway 99 Lynnwood, WA. 98036 Prepared By: Group Four, Inc. 19502 56th Ave. W. Lynnwood, WA. 98036 (206) 775-,4581 August 2, 1988 ( 09, ID 4 1 (9v TA D A:(-' A** TE M: IN= SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT Edmonds Mazda 8-2-88 87-4525 Pg. 1/ 1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located north of the intersection of Highway 99 and 76th Avenue West and is comprised of 3.53 acres. The property currently contains eight existing structures, two of which were used as a mink pelting facility. The site is bordered on the north by apartment complexes and residential housing. The south side of the property is bounded by a condominium development and a fiberglass repair shop. The ground is comprised o*f evergreen trees with moderate ground coverage. Topography slopes to the east with an average slope of approximately 5%. EXISTING DRAINAGE Drainage consists of runoff from the site into the system along Highway 99. Currently no drainage system exists on the site and there is no contributing runoff into the site from outside areas. PROPOSED DRAINAGE conveyance pipe and structures have been sized for the 10 year design storm. The detention vault has been sized for a 10 year design storage and a 10 year release. All runoff will be conveyed to the detention vault except areas to the west and north which will be left undeveloped. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Release from the vault will be conveyed into a 1211 pipe drainage system currently existing on Highway 99 where it will continue south approximately 6001 to the intersection of High ' way 99 and 224th Street. It appears that from here the release may be conveyed southeasterly to Ballinger Lake. Judging from the capacities of the downstream I roadside drainage system, the proposed development will have minimal impact on downstream systems. lu *637-4��- .�- I - re-6.1 0.6,0 -z 1) 4i it OSY 13 �3177o joT-AL- Acceo,- AQeA�- a aw 06*13'W PT -5.2 A6 If Narcvwi4 o 10 4 -Type I P 564-SO WV. '5-32.13 o5 50* -TyP 61-35 - 11111191P, 582. z P 0 f3lJlL0lt,!a C5. 5 ROO 'r Ll�e If ply Of I If D.- -ear. III CA�h 76;- 12,50. AeC Ne-. C)GTEPZPT w RF-STRaCTOR 5�5 v a FS --5A.CWG I - --- 1-5,-1z"So ... :. El. ARVA L cot4w.1 I a07 tal so 351.v;o C-1547-Typs I C15110 Ty*pe I 7-- TOP .35 IZ -fop br. 00 /190co INV. 31.5t.r-z INY '9. 19C. Z SUCI>BA.S114. MAP, A STORM DRAIN STORAGE REQUIREMENTS A acres Area of Basin C e 0, zl+ Existing coefficient of impervi usness of Basin ground C, or 114 c d c?. 77. Developed coefficient of mperviousness of Basin as planned Cc Z-0, �-- Z -7 t Is 5-10 L B&O feet Length (maximum) o verland travel S 4P % Slope (avera from Basin high point to low point (on w ercourse) V ft/sec. Runoff te r T c minutes m- of concentration from -formula: (L V (60)) = T r c 1 10 in/hr, 11 intensity from rainfall curve ar storm) Q e cfs Existing outflow from site using equation: e e 10 Q0 047 c,o Maximum outflow permitted per acre u imperviousness from formula: Q = 0 Qe 'ACd T = T, 44. minutes Storage time (to capacity) from formula: 0 T V s s /44,, cf1/A/C d Required vol u*me of storage per acre in Basin from equation: -Z — V s = _S/6,07 1 — 4o �2, -F V v t cubic feet Requii-ed volume of storage for this Basin from equation: Vt = VsACd 6�.Ac 0. 014- v--' STORM DRAIN STORAGE REQUIREMENTS 6 C;. A acres Area of Basin Ce Existing coefficient of. imperviousness of C d =0'-16-7 L = 36 <D feet V r = ft/sec. Tc = minutes 1 10 = I�S- in/hr. Qe = 0. 9 -3 cfs cfs Q0 0. 47 T minutes zS Vs = 19 4(o cf/A/Cd Z-57, Vt 3,9Z-� cubic feet Ba s i n g ro u n a i ---, 7 Z> 6, 710 1 -r- (,� \ i- � (.Is-) . j 11 19 L-A-> Developed coefficient of imperviousness of jl,*'��7 Basin as planned Length (maximum) of overland travel slope (average) from Basin high point to low point (on watercourse) Runoff rate Time of concentration from formula: 10 + (L -L V r (60)) = T c Rainfall intensity from rainfall -curve (10-year storm) Existing outflow from site using equation: e 10 e Maximum outflow permitted per acre imperviousness from formula: Q0 = Qe * AC d Storage time (to capacity) from formula: T Required volume of storage per acre in Basin from equation: V 41zC, -F 7- -t- 7- S Required volume of storage for this Basin from equation: V t = V AC d 2-3 .17 7 (A V 3 cF -31 �9 067 0 YEAR DESIGN STORM k2S YEAR DE�IGN STORli TWE OF OUTLET K STORAGE MAXIMUM STORAGE PEAK STORAGE KAXIMUM ST AG- ARCA (MONUTES) VOLUME (FT3/AC) TIME (MINUTES) VOLUME (FMAC�. USL FOR ORIFICE WITH HEAD r 2 2 S'S —� —o vs 2607T 2 7 4329 T T--25t Y 5- 10 QoT W06 25 t —�—o — 0 ---5— - A 0 Qc) T COOTY CONSTANT FLOH -1 F1 503 T--25+ —Q Ys 3607 -T- 60 �18� 0 �4 ys 4329 T- f 0 T� QOT --25 T 0 60 Q,1 48 .), - cl�- 17- (z4Fkl7 H,F-Arr--�. Z. o CF� (9. 6-z- Z 0. �T I Z(-37-.ZY-Z,c)cj 46 -7 T-r � R'l,&C-CL ( L-'T" 2- 1 c-F� I per.. , MI. 1980 IWO Riser Inflow Cur'Ves -0 Legend Weir flow. Q.-9.739 D r H3/2 ------- Ell I ............. Orifice flow. 3.782 I - ------ ....... MPH: 0 mml MEN a OMOMMOMOMMOMICOM nun =Mnmuuummmmmmonulll INMEN U0091111 ME Nil U I H111H IM I MINION 111 '�ource: USDA-SCS 111-73 Plate 1.26h f.l. - C- - V?-ev" SA LOA -00 CF/Az-- J> Z- 0 T-AL- (2,) t-4or—F \,/OL-, I r-� = 3Z-0 Ft-, C�- 1 14-6 cf= Vw I o Vc.,t-. (leiar!> r --3, --�a �3 0 0 .�OIL EROSION POTENTIAL HYDROLOGIC GROUP K FACTOR ------------ Aiderwood Beausite Bellingham Briscot Buckle moderate -severe moderate -very severe slight slight slight C B C C B/C .20 .15 .24 Earlmont slight— B/C Edgewick slight B Everett . ' moderate -severe A .10 — Indianola moderate -severe A .24 — Kitsa moderate -severe C .37 Klaus slighti B .20 Neiltdn slight -moderate B .15 Newberq s light B Nooksack slight B Norma slight B/C .23 Orcas none D .05 Oridia slight C Ovall Severe C .28 Pilchuck moderate -severe A .10 Puget slight E�/C 32 Puyallup slicjht B .28 Raqnar moderate -severe A .32 Renton Sliqht B/C Salal slight B Sammamish none C Seattle none C Shalcar slight C .24 Si slight B -Snohomish sliclht D L .17 ------------ Sul,t-.xn 4- sliqht C .3/ Tukwila slight D LL Woodinville slight r /n� C/D 45. FOR 4 5 .25 30 35 4 5 5 1150 40 35 35 30 25 40 45 20 35 2-YEAR 24-HR. PRECIPITATION PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OF AN a EVERETT 15 1 20 25 C- 50 30 35 SEATTLE 35 so 40 )20 35 3 30 N 40 35 0 30 40 4s------ 45 45 4 .5 0 r4o n3 0 4 30 45 35 f 3 5 .45 W�l 4 In v 25 30 15 5 20 A - Wl GROUP FOUR, Inc. 19502 - 56th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 FAX (206) 362-3819 (206) 775-4581 - (206) 362-4244 R4C41N#'ir-V 0 AU G 3 11988 COUN,T�7r, PERMIT —1 H".RAULIC REPORT AND CALCULATIONS EDMONDS MAZDA Lynnwood, Washington Group Four Job No. 87-4525 Prepared For: Doug Ikegami 20700 Highway 99 Lynnwood, WA. 98036 Prepared By: Group Four, Inc. 19502 56th Ave. W. Lynnwood, WA. 98036 (206) 775-4581 August 2, 1988 j�P--Vj5c—P ie-7,S—,yg d V 8-Z- 83 SURVEYING ENGINEERING . PLANNING MANAGEMENT .,Edmonds Mazda 8-2-88 87-4525 Pg. 1/1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION The site is -located north of the intersection of Highway 99 and 76th Avenue West and is comprised of 3.53 acres. The property currently contains eight existing structures, two of which were used as a mink pelting facility. The site is bordered on the north by apartment complexes and residential housing. The south side of the property is bounded by a condominium development and a fiberglass repair shop. The ground is comprised of evergreen trees with moderate ground coverage. Topography slopes to the east with an average slope of approximately 5%. EXISTING DRAINAGE Drainage consists of runoff from the site into the system along Highway 99. Currently no drainage system exists on the site and there is no contributing runoff into the site from outside areas. PROPOSED DRAINAGE conveyance pipe and structures have been sized for the 10 year design storm. The detention vault has been sized for a 10 year design storage and a 10 year release. All runoff will be conveyed to the detention vault except areas to the west and north which 'will be left undeveloped. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Release from the vault- will be conveyed into a 1211 pipe drainage system currently existing on Highway 99 where it will continue south approximately 6001 to the intersection of Highway 99 and 224th Street. It appears that from here the release may be conveyed southeasterly to Ballinger Lake. Judging from the capao�`ties of the downstream roadside drainage system, the proposed development will have minimal impact on downstream systems. EDMONI-�)-5 *637-4��- Suit Aec-lt-4 Aiz-t�� (D 13"o S)Z-60 0.6-C) osy 13, Z�9-o 14-4 0.0,91 1:31'770 17— Q x CD C16 ioT-AL- AczLi--z, 4- AQeA. CA41�py Ae.>ve, /CD '5LZIf—.. Te- AFMA �:- RAJ N ,n ,a - -, ro -..5 ,I WLE-eT Z MAP a. C. .4 STORM DRAIN STORAGE REQUIREMENTS A = Z, VP acres C e = 7z+ Cd = o. 77 L B&O f eet S % V ft/sec. r I Area of Basin Existing coefficient of impery usness of OT m pe ry , /usne� c 0z 114 Basin ground 1-,7-7�5 & C1 -70 Developed coefficient of mperviousnes-s of �L - r'� Basin as planned Z-0, r__ z -7 5_1 0 7D ('j) 7D f 0 rl Length (maximum) of overland travel Slope (averagp)' from Basin high point to low point (on wastercourse) Runoff Ze T c minutes m OP6f concentration from formula: \ 1' 4 (L -* V (60)) = T '0%, 10 + ' r c 11 intensity from rainfall curve I in/hr. Rj�a 4' 10 )—ear storm) ejj� cfs A Existing outflow from site using equation: Qe C I A = Q I e 10 e Q0 047 cfs/i Maximum outflow permitted per acre imperviousness TrOM Tormula: Q0 = L4e ALI d T to minutes Storage time (to capacity) from formula: T 5-i� V s 14 '7�� c -1/A/C d Required volume of �torage per acre in Basin from equation: Vs =-? - 40 (_�2, T Vt -7 ,0'Z_-2__ cubic feet Required volume of storage for this Basin from z equation: Vt = V s AC d 2_0 (Z - S� 0. 5� f= > 02:1 0 14- V--, -A . I . S STORM DRAIN STORAGE REQUIREMENTS 6 C, F:>- C� A acres Area of Basin A�) 6ML-an.) C, Existing coefficient of imperviousness of Basin ground iS-7, 144 (. I S�) .1) 4- 11 C Developed coeffici-ent of impervi,ousnE:ss of d = —16 -7 Basin as planned 20 A& �S7 I i Vio- L. = '36(D /feet. Length (maximum) of overland travel IV r = ft/sec. Tc = minutes 1 10 i'n/hr. Qe 0. 9 3. cfs Q0 0,4-7 -"cfs T minutes Vs = 19:4(o cf/A/Cd Z-5, Vt cubic feet UOUUL,%-� PFz-,->%JJ C�V-:t� 0. Slope -(average', from Basin high point to low point (on watercourse) Runoff rate Time of concentration from formula: 10 + -(L -, V r (60)) = T c Rainfall intensi-ty from rainfall curve (10-year storm) Existing outflow from site using equation: e 10 e Maximum outflow permitted per acre imperviousness from formula:-Qo = Qe * AC d Storage time (to capacity) from formula': T 6 Z- S- -r Required volume of storage per acre in Basi'n from equation: V 4,3-z�cj 7- s .-4-o G2o 'T Required volume of storage for this Basin from equation: V t.= V AC d 2�� .17 >,- 06 >,- 1, 07 (Avc—, 31 r—f= (2(o CF 5-T,-- -">C or-, J.,)C)g4e&b,4� q4 MT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 40. kio JV —Its wi JN �10 YEAR DESIGN STORM V25 YiEAR DEtIGN STORA ,..REA TYPE OF OUTLET PEAK STORAGE MAXIMUM STO AG� TIME (hlNUTES) YOLUME (FMAC PEAK STOGGE TIME WNUTES) MAXIMUM STS%,(� YOLUME (FT AC USE FOR SN 0 t: ly, I SI I ORIFICE VITH HEAD —if T--25t Y vs 3607T 7—. 10 Q,T 5 2706 i I -(Fo- 4329 T 40 QOT:,l CONSTANT FLOW - -jfl503 T--25+f —Q 0 Ys 3607 T 60 QoT T--25 t)fl 04 1 y - s 4329 T 60 COWTY 4� E-DXA:Ao,,>-s WA 4-Ap 6-17- IK 7 ct, 61� 4.94,6-74 Tr C)'ZA-Z; CA-L.1,-, q=is. 7, < 15 00 . O� 1.26 22= 111111111 H�Wmmp. nUICH of 19=10111111 E won 10=0MCOrmi R =,.was n ===011CROUNIUMUR 0 imam all IMMOCOXIMIMMOOKE wmm�=Unn OMEMMOMMUMIOIII mum MEN INE111111111 Nimmons MIMI an volls-11 Mimi MIMI 0 oil 1 9 An Source: USDA-SCS 111-73 Plate 1.26h Ire --0^- Ito '10-rA FF \/O lzaa& Z-C-F 1A 10, T-A-A- 14-6 cp .10 TA-1, L, -Z) -3a L-3 cr SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL HYDROLOGIC GROUP K FACTOR ._20 Aiderwoou te, BeaEusite Bellin ham Briscot Bu moderate-very severe moc sliaht sl. sliqht slight B c c B/C .15 .24 Earlmont Edgewick slight slight B/C B Everett moderate -severe A -.10 Indianola moderate -severe A .24 Ki sa moderate -severe c .37 Klaus slight B .2.0 Neilton .#.ght-moderate sli B .15 Newberg . sliaht B Nooksack Slight B Norma slight B/-C .28 Orcas none D .0-5 Oridia slight c Ovall, Severe c .28 Pilchuck moderate -severe A .10 Puget slight Ivc 32 Puvallup slicjht B J_ .28 moderate -severe A .32 Raqnar sliqht _B/C Renton slight B S alal Sammamish none none c c Seattle - Shalcar: sliqht c .24 Si sliqht B D .17 . Snohomish slight Sul-,__�n slight c .3/ sliqht D Tukwila Woodinville slight C/D 45. is TEMPORARY SEDIMENT PONDS NOMOGRAPH (-RU-NOFF VOLUME) TYPE 1A STORM AREA 7 .44 90— 8 5 is 04 80- 80 75 - -75: -14 -170- im -70 rL4 1-71 W4 (00--60 mm, -Lr 55- D c B. -:55, A .5 /.o /.5 25 3.0 HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP RUi1bFF INCHES C.- 500- 1000- /500- 2000- f:-4 25-oo 3 O�� BASED UPON A -TIME OF :,I CONCENTRATION OF .25 HR. > 4000- TT,�. 4500- Is 0 U) 43. k-NO—Mom-NOR 0 3' 25 35 1 4 5 —' Z / 40 35 35 30 25 4 5 20 35 0 EVERETT 15 1 20 J25 L 30 SEAfTLE 35 J3 5�, 20 cl\ 5 TACOMA 74 1 C50 5,0 30 35 �5 �1!, A_ Go. _� 41 A �_ 35 �40 1 - 5, 25 35 F - s � - 5' 35 .2 �35 ( 's U-40 40 4s 45 45 45 n 3 2—YEAR — 24—HR. PRECIPITATION PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OFAN C_� 3 35 :1 u 45 45 35 4 25 Y �45 30, f 50, Q.5.0 30 QX35, r i- An )n 5 25 5 33 25 20 DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Prepared for: GROUPFOUR, INC. 19502 56th Ave. West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 2101 -112th Avenue N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455-5320 DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Prepared for: GROUP FOURo, INC. 19502 56th Ave. West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Prepared by: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th Ave. N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455-5320 January, 1988 AO\S IS OUR 20 TH "/VNIVERSNO' TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE 1 CALCULATED LEVEL OF SERVICE DURING STREET TRAFFIC PEAK HOURS 6 TABLE 2 NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS BY LOCATION 7 FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP 8 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN FIGURE 3 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 10 FIGURE 4 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROJECT 11 FIGURE 5 PROJECTED 1988 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE PROJECT 12 t ATTACHMENTS CITY OF EDMONDS FRONTAGE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY REPORTS (4 sheets) TP&E Staff Contributors to this Study: David H. Enger, P.E., Vice President Elden D. McCall, Transportation Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is a proposed new car sales facility to be located between Highway 99 and 76th Ave. W. in the City of Edmonds (See Figure 1). Per the preliminary site plan the pro- ject will include a new building of approximately 14,000 square feet and an existing building of approximately 4,300 square feet to be remodeled for the purpose of auto service (approximate to- tal 18,300 square feet). The proposed project is expected to be completed this year and have between 34 and 38 personnel em- ployed. Access to the site will be by driveways on Highway 99 and 76th Ave. West. The proposed facility will replace the existing Doug's Lynnwood Mazda facility, which is located on SR 99 at 208th St. S.W., approximately one mile north of the proposed site. The ex- isting facility has approximately 8000 square feet of building floor area and about 30 employees. The reason for the move is the larger area of the proposed site. EXISTING CONDITIONS Highway 99 (SR 99) is a five lane major arterial. Access to 1-5 is by way of SR 99 and 220th St. S.W. to the 220th St. S.W. interchange, approximately 649 feet north and one mile east of the proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda site. The 1986 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on SR 99 at 244th St. S.W. was 36,100 accord- ing to 1986 Annual Traffic Report by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Highway 99 has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH and has street lighting on its east side. A bus stop (Community Transit routes 750 and 870) is located on the west side of SR 99 approximately 50 feet north of the pro- posed site. 1 76th Ave. W. is a two-lane minor arterial with curbs, gut- ters and sidewalks on both sides. The street has a curb to curb width of 44 feet and has parallel parking. The intersection with 220th St. S.W. is controlled by an actuated traffic signal sys- tem. The intersection with 224th St. S.W. is controlled by a four-way stop, however, the westbound right -turn -only lane is per- mitted free movement. Approximately 660 feet south of the proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda site SR 99 intersects 224th St. S.W. and is controlled by an actuated traffic signal system. At this intersection the northbound and southbound approaches on SR 99 are both comprised of one left -turn lane, two through lanes, and a separate right - turn lane. 224th St. S.W. is a two-lane facility classified as a minor arterial. At its intersection with SR 99 the eastbound and west- bound approaches both have a through/left-turn lane, and a right - turn only lane. At its intersection with 76th Ave. W. the westbound lanes consist of a through/left-turn lane and a right - turn only lane, while the eastbound approach is comprised of a single lane for all three movements. Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 3. The volumes at the 76th Ave. W./224th St. S.W. and SR 99/224th St. S.W. intersections are from manual counts taken by TP&E on Thursday, January 14, 1988 and Tuesday, January 19, 1988 respec- tively. The volumes shown for the 76th Ave. W./220th St. S.W. in- tersection are based on counts taken by the City of Edmonds in July, 1987. The street traffic PM peak hour was determined to be 4:30-5:30 PM. The PM peak hour volumes shown on Figure 3 were 2 balanced to eliminate the discrepancies between counts taken at different times. Table 1 shows the PM peak hour calculated level of service (LOS) for each of the pertinent intersections'. LOS is a qualitative term that describes the operating conditions that a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway. It is specified on six different levels ranging from A (optimum flow conditions) to F (extreme congestion). Level of Service C is typically used for design purposes, although in urban areas LOS D is acceptable for short periods of time such as the AM and PM peak hours. The calculated levels of service were performed by using an FHWA computer program for the Highway Capacity Manual method. The signalized intersections, 76th Ave. W./220th St. S.W. and SR 99/224th St. S.W., were analyzed using a cycle length of 120 and 148 seconds respectively. Traffic accident data was obtained from WSDOT and the City of Edmonds. Between 1984 and the midpoint of 1987 there were a total of 126 accidents within the project study area (see Table 2). of these accidents, 117 occurred on SR 99; the predominant accident was the rear -end collision, which 'is not uncommon for a high volume signalized street system. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT The proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is expected to generate approximately 869 vehicular trips on an average weekday at full occupancy. This volume is based on data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in Trip Generation - An Informational Report (third edition, 1982). A vehicle trip is defined, as "A single or one -directional vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the Cl study site. Based on the same data, the project wil 1 generate approximately 71 trips during the AM street traffic peak hour and 84 trips during the PM street traffi c peak hour. For the PM street traffic peak hour, 36 trips will be entering and 48 trips will be exiting the site. Figure 4 shows the expected distribution of the PM peak hour traffic volumes generated by the Doug's Lynnwood Mazda. Figure 5 presents the 1988 PM peak hour traffic volumes on the adjacent streets with the proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda. These figures are based on the assumption that 50 percent of the site -generated trips are diverted from the existing traffic volumes on the adja- cent streets. Since the existing Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is near- by, many of the employees and customers presently use the streets in the vicinity of the proposed site. Based on the assumption above the LOS for all relevant inter- sections were calculated for the PM peak period in 1988. The re- sults are displayed in Table 1. At the SR 99 driveway the left turn movements will operate at LOS D and E during the PM peak hour due to the heavy southbound opposing traffic volume on SR 99. At the signalized intersections it is apparent that the traf- f ic volumes generated by Doug's Lynnwood Mazda are low compared to the existing traffic. The impact of Doug's Lynnwood Mazda on the pertinent intersections will not be significant, and will not change the calculated 1988 PM peak hour levels of service. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The traffic generated by Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is not expect- ed to cause any major traffic problems. The slight increase of F11 traffic will not have any effect on the LOS at the existing inter- sections on 76th Ave. W. or SR 99. The traffic volumes expected to use the 76th Ave. W. driveway are so low that turn lanes or other traffic control improvements will not be needed. The LOS M & E) for the left turning movements at the SR 99 driveway are tolerable and will not have any effect on the overall LOS on SR 99. 'The existing two way left turn lane on SR 99 in front of the site will facilitate left turns to and from the driveway. A right turn lane on SR 99 into the site is not warranted due to the low right turn traffic volumes. However, the City of Edmonds does require that the SR 99 Frontage Development Standard be implemented, a copy of which is attached. The required 11.5 foot asphalt concrete shoulder extending along the front of the proposed site will insure uninterrupted flow for southbound traf- fic on SR 99 by serving as an acceleration and deceleration lane for southbound vehicles entering or exiting the site. Eventually this paved 'shoulder may be converted into a through traffic lane and/or a high occupancy vehicle lane. The two driveway approaches from the proposed project site shall be constructed to meet the City of Edmonds- Development Standards. We recommend that the driveway along SR 99 be at least 30 feet wide, as indicated on the site plan, and have a curb radius of at least 15 feet. During field observation at the 76th Ave. W./224th St. S.W. intersection (four-way stop controlled), the existing intersec- tion traffic control devices appeared to be confusing to drivers entering the intersection. In particularl potential conflicts were observed on the north leg of the intersection between west- bound right turning vehicles, which face a right turn green ar- row, and eastbound left turn vehicles, which normally would have 5 the right-of-way over the channelized westbound right turning traffic. Several traffic control alternative improvements are possible, including striping for two northbound lanes north of the intersection to separate the flows. Another alternative would be to remove the right turn green arrow and install a yield sign for the westbound right turn. The City should continue to monitor the situation to determine if and when improvements should be made. We recommend that "4-way" signs (RI-3) be in- stalled below all "Stop" signs at this intersection. 6 TABLE 1 Calculated Level of Service (LOS) During 1988 Street Traffic PM Peak Hours Intersection SR 99/Site Driveway SR 99/224th St. S.W. 76th Ave. W./220th St. S.W. 76th Ave. W./Site Driveway 76th Ave. W./224th St. S.W. Without Project Signalized intersection wi th Project D (1eft in) A (right out) E (left out) C C D D A (all turns) B B TABLE 2 Number of Accidents by Location Recorded by Washington State Department of Transportation and the City of Edmonds 1984 1985 1986 1987 * Total Intersection of SR 99/220th St. S.W. 14 9 18 6 47 On SR 99 between 220th St. S.W./ 224th St. S.W. Intersection of SR 99/224th St. S.W. Intersection of 76th Ave. w./ 220th St. S.W. On 76th Ave. W. between 220th St. S.W./ 224th St. S.W. Intersection of 76th Ave. W./ 224th St. S.W. Total First half of 1987 only. 14 13 7 11 6 11 0 0 2 2 36 6 34 2 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 3 40 30 39 17 126 2 X I- 9 . .... co d' - -7�w 199TH St CL W TH S4 19 , '' Tl p P200TH NY x > Sw: > 201ST ST SW- 4> —715 l . -k �: . 201ST :A CADE 1 _j c > 202ND ST K L 0 4 Sw 202NO ST cc 0 Sw 2MD L �'-'COMMU/Avfl y;,... 202NO 202 PL SW' Sws- PL Sw CL CLI T 39 RD C6dEG 00 203RD ST SW C3 cc PL k C, M: -1 - TH S > 2D4TH ST S ad < k 11 1. - : I R Mr Sw TH 201 qp,.!2 — S M 204TH: ST*t'-,:-�:Q%�- S C" 205TH rm 206TH PL SW -PfN -�ST .206THi IST SVA (L > ST SW < 9 207TH ST 206T PK S z > p Sw & OD a 3r 208TH %T S -i SNO > 5 oc'. H > > > PL SW 00 210 Ift Sw 039TH T Sw 210T T < S < 210TH ST Sw 3:1 f- u 0 0 211 X- 0 z POL Sw ro 2 (14 (D :.,k � 11 T rl ziv� z >1 Lj FS �Sw r- — 232TH ST T �;:i: ST.SSW Sw R !j6 R D > EDMONDS > S 2!1.32TTH ]ST SWtHS < A 213TH RID 214TH PL Sw > FL 2 PAI 14TH z TH PL SEE TH ST 1,13LSW.;j : tL 11TH ST S W 3: 215 214Tt 21 tTH Dc� I - , : - :1 ,, , . ::::� 4� � .. 4'. 'o, S to 2 17TH ES EVENS ST S% PROPOSED SITE PL 218T� 218TH ST S -S 218T '.'il L;�T ST r H ST 219T1 CL > C, C f9TH Sw %: ST W 220 Sw 220TH ST - < 220TH ST S'14 220 PL' N—xT — — - -.-- l:-...:I-- KINGS 221 T K7 co IST - I Hosp 221S L Sw PL ST 211t PL%.,'� N S�W 222N() . I . 3: C, 223R SW -.',-.%'t:::�223AD K: X —NQ ST SW .1. > > .%.. IL, L Lespf�ANCE ST I 0- 1, .11.,�< > 3t C SE S > > Sw < > > ST S�v 224TIl !�Ti x M w d 225TH X z -I!j 25T V6TH ."PL A in =3 ;��. I'D - . > 5TH PL S� TIL, Lp L so 3:.- > 01 Sw < F4 6TH F ne Tr Z \w .. . Z27� cli 51 'A,,. --- -L SW > > 'ST UK H 22 228WOI0� < ST W A S, . '.. I , — A: S74. 229 229TH ST 1�� 2 9TH ST ... ....... CL m -221TH P -d--- r.sb.� > co 2 9TH PL Sw< I 3t 23 TH ST Sw > IA kLS_ 2313T < 231ST R L Sw ST SW a -ca rin ST 23 cc 231 -fL-J:f8I;Z _%NL0 A, SW A� ST SW > -S x A r201� Sw PL T 3. > TH tr TS 210TI108-T S T IS" �lr PL ;w L Sw I LNI Z32ND -�P > x . ..233RD PL < �T � : . b, 132W CW A S ,.--co JR W 23 TH '0 r sw z 234TH ST SW in z 0 PL 3: Sw :� '-< :�- 5 ..: 'ck F<> �- L04JS LN - - - L 1. T -Sl- SA T- 2361H --237T Sw ��if i i) 14-41 VICINITY MAP DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE r, Ill 4�i -[M ti IT 17 SITE PLAN DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE 2 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE 3 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROJECT DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE Ell 0 0 01) 0) 282 336 —442 -0-35 —653 220th, St. -SW 326— 74--,#, 397— t ry 22`4 too" 0 N 2 21 t St. SW 222nd 'St. SW PROJECT 5 01-5 SI TE ----32 N 19 not to scale 19 11)(0 C) (-0 CIA ri Ltn 318 80 —124 110 .12 76 Or 3,1 —187 224th St. SW 96--. 25 ( 24 �/ 159- 55— 39E 16 —,*, C-4 ('4 LO 43 /,-> ('C Vv AD C) t IN �0 01 1�1 3 PROJECTED '1988 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE PROJECT DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS rFIGURE 5 SM.1 Engineering 1D.N. CtArb Ira. st half -Tra-j,-,l (, L 1 —� -� 71— Ev-acte, 9 9 T�pical �Aalf (Tj p. N O-re I'lan+jyjq 'Str*lp +o ba 0j,50 us� loca+c, J or �5i�hci( Fole5 wa+&( Y-yo-Ins ntorry) JY-CUYIS e.+C-. TNCL for��O-,,%a ceyrevt cor-\,C-rcile- ; Cie-WAl k- 6�op(:5a aj Y4' pe-r drain 6i4-%,l oi SClyro-rJ!�5 Stay', daf :A�>- Cornn"Ie-VC-�0A 6c Ci; OY-% rev e Lk) C- 0 yy N 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..220TH ST. SW/76TH AVE. W AREA TYPE..... =` ANALYST . . . . . . . EDM DATE .......... 1/21/88 TIME .......... 4:30-5:30 PM COMMENT....... EXISTING PM PK HR CONDITIONS (7/6/87) VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 74 34 33 145 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.0 TH 230 336 .307 181 : TR 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 RT 22 282 18 73 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 2 113 2 29 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.0O 1.00 N 0 0.90 14 Y 13.6 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 6 Y 13.6 4 ' NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 3 Y 13.6 4 SB 0.00 3.00 N 0 0 0.90 15 Y 13.6 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH--1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X / TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 15.4 32.8 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 29.80.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL ' OF SERVICE LANE GRP. \� V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP.' LOS EB . LTR 0.66 8 0.128 43.0 E 43.0 ' E WB LT 0.870 0.273 33.3 D 25.2 D R 0.244 0.522 7.4 B NB LT 0.874 0.250 35.3 D 33.9 D R 0.023 0.523 6.5 B SB LT 0.867 0.248 38.1 D 35.4 . D R 0.090 0.377 15.6 C INTERSECTION: Delay = 33.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.870 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..224TH ST. SW/HIGHWAY 99 AREA TYPE..... ANALYST.......EDM DATE .......... 1/21/88 TIME .......... 4:30-5:30 PM COMMENT ....... EX[STlNG PM PK HR CONDITIONS (1/19/8P) __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 24 31 311 93 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 L 13.0 L 13.0 TH 39 76 1609 1170 : R 11.0 R 11.0 T 11.0 T 11.0 RT 43 80 27 51 : 12.0 12.0 T 11.0 T 11.0 RR 10 10 10 10 : 12.0 12.0 R 11.5 R 11.5 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE , (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0' 0.90 10 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 13.6 4 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 13.6 4 __________________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 148.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X ' TH X X RT X RT X X ' PD X PD X X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X X � GREEN 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 41.4 68.5 9.8 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 ---------------------- 0.0 ... 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE ' LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 1.004 0.117 113.9 F 87.9 F R 0.215 0.117 38.3 D WB LT 0.746 0.117 50.6 E 46.6 E R 0.456 0.117 40.5 E NB L 0.726 0.273 40.8 E 11.1' B ' T 0.718 0.756 5.7 B R 0.017 0.756 2.1 A SB L 0.895 0.066 88.5 F 18.9 C T 0.719 0.549 14.1 B R 0.056 0.549 7.3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.766 LOS = C N� 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED w� INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ' ************************************************************************** N� INTERSECT ION..224TH ST. SW/HIGHWAY 99 AREA TYPE. . . . . __� ANALYST.......EDM DATE .......... 1/21/88 TIME. . . . . . . . . .4:30-5:30 PM ' ' COMMENT.......FURURE ' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1988 PM PK HR CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB :' EB WB NB SB LT 24 31 313 93 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 L 13.0 L 13.0 N� TH 39 76 1617 1179 : R 11.0 R 11.0 T ��11.0 � T. 110 RT^43 80 27 51 : 12.0 12.� T 11.0 T 11.0 RR10 10 10 10 : 12.0 111i0 R 11.5 R 11.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 � 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS N� GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%} <%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min 1- EB 0.00 2.00 N Y 2.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0. 90 10 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 13.6 4 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 13.6 4 N� -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 148.0 PH-1 PH-2 'PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X N� TH X m� TH X X RT X RT X X PD X ' PD k X WE( LT X SB LT X ` TH X ` TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X X N� GREEN 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 41.4 68.5 9.8 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. Y/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 1.04 0.117 113.9 F 87.9 F N� R 0.215 0. 117 38.3 D WB LT 0.746 0.117 50.6 E 46.6 E R 0.456 0.117 40.5 E NB L 0.731 0.273 41.0 E 11.1 B N� T 0.722 0.756 5.7 B R 0.017 0.756 2.1 A SB L 0.895 0.066 88.5 F 19.0 C N� T 0.724 0.549- 14.2 El R 0.056 0.549 7.3 B N� INTERSECTION: �� Delay = 17.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0. 769 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SlSNALIZEE INTERSECTIONE SUMMARY REFOR!" � I11TERSECTION..220TH ST. SW/76TH AVE. W 0� AREA TYFE..... ANALYST ....... EDM DATE .......... 1/21/38 TIME .......... 4:30-5:30 PM COMMENT ....... FUTURE __________________________________________________________________________ 1588 PM Fk VAR CONDITIONS WITH PFOJECT VO1 GEOME74Y 0� EB NB m� NB SB : ED Wl'! NB SB LT 74 05 33 145 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.� TH 230 336 308 182 : TR 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.� RT 22 182 22 73 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 2 117 2 29 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.� : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.,::, __---- ___--- ________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 er ADJUSTMENT FACTOR..'' GRADE H7 ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. �YPE m� Y/N min T EB 0.00 1. o0 N 0 0 0.90 14 Y 13.6 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 6 Y 13.6 4 NB Y 13.6 4 SB 0.00 3.00 |!, 0 0 0. 90 15 Y 13. 6 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.� PH-1 7H-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 1"'H-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT Y NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X m� PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 15.4 3Z.8 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 29.8 0.0 0.0 �� ELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW ' __________________________________________________________________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE N� LANE GRP. � Y/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. L[i� EB LTR 0.866 0.128 43.3 E 43.0 E WB LT 0.972 0.273 33.5 D 25.4 D R (). 244 0.522 7.4 B NB LT 0.977 0.250 35.5 D 33.9 D R �.029 0.523 6.5 B SB LT 0.870 0.248 38.4 D 35.7 D 0T0 0.377 15.6 C __________________________________________________________________________ �� INTERSECTION: Delav = 33.4 (sec/veh) V,'C [ = 0. 872 LOS = I:) CITY OF ED-101)S APPLICATIO""' to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD 7` 7 77 DATE_ SITE PI.AN BUILDIN*G PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONL\!ENTAL DATA V"'RECEIPT # SIGN EXHIBITS --FEE— —RFCPT PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUtIBER: HEARING DATE -7 Ire 1W OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE <E3ECMe-QzAY-, ARCHMCT& /n-ANNer-,,s T-n - ij?'e;l FOR VOkXV JKe��J —PHONE ADDRESS 140 NAINIEP-, NE '3. 601-E C FtNT04 WA 610013(3 ZIP CODE :ARCHITECT /DESIGNER PHONE ADDRESS �PROPERTY ADDRESS I'Ll �!)o PACJfqC t" 15 ZONING Ce LEGAL DESCRIPTION e\N V4 OF eEC 2-9 IV4 F V7 r-4 K(&e 4- EWM EPENFESALL�j WE-Cr OF At-30 Ago t-W� 6[01 or- Aggip Api 1z) -uoTtt ME W e0JT14 QP 2-2-1c-T 5T, 5W. 'PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: 1.' Building Plans Preliminary_ Final x Site Plan X Landscape Plan X Elevations Sign Elevations. X Site Plan __X Landscape Plan X, �3. Modification of previous approval ,EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY At4(PAAL, rp-LTINe (�:o '&tNa-r-- F-PMJL�y RE-S. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Al,)TZ--) 5ftANFWM OFFICr--, /4km MA(f-41E--NE:t,4Cr-- CXSTQMM.F-Mn4),�EP—= NF-JN C^2. PAFK4 W 6 CAz VIA5tj orPf not4 peAuai& t)-� Ncr Fcv, pmw c- A)To e4up t6q,,v PA (ki b ro 9 A C-- e, APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT ID CDfAMeNCC-- QE�N Pe~(7- PfrWA4— ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK ( +) MON -fff5 RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per- L- mission for public'officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject r—perty for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. Sianntiirp nf Annlirnnt) REk."IVED JUN 15 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST �PIRI 'G DEPT.. Purposc of Checklist: The State Environmental PolicN. Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C ROX, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal b::forc making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality or the environment. The purpose or this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or a%loid impacts from thc'proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions f6r Applicants: This environmental checklist asks vou to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine 'whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the ans"wer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or *does not ap- ply Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts or your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additionai information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you st�bmit this checklist may ask you to explain you; answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably TClated to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonprojcci proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply." IN' AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant,' and "property or site' should be read as "proposal," "proposer.' and "affected geographic area," respectively. A.BACKGROUND I - Name of proposed project, if applicable: CM16'5 MAZOA OP 00MONM 2. Name of applicant: 0nU5 1ABCDAMI 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: `�V 6eOME7NX IFLANNE&S JOHN MINATo 140 r-kAINIM Ave -5. 5UITE C AENroir-4 WA e160 55 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: Cfty or EC>&t9f4jD5 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): C0N6TPA,VDT_10N _Z) E5501N U" 01Y AMP,0V,.V__ 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 7 — ** /�'2 r- FO-'c-S I LOT- F_XP/4�NSION vVIN C(S ZeNe s0UTHK1tVZC> A%_"46 f1WY T3 r<R /%,TO 1NV&q7Z)PY /*JN0 0&-- it . 8. List an%- environmental information you this proposal. FAI01Q, ENVF0NA4&JT?N_ Af,5,140,A77c" K-no\A about that has been prepared. or be prepared, directly related to C4E0<-L4ST_ 5Vef-A1T7Ef:> W/T-ft J-�C—Zo"C_ 9. Do you know whether applications a I re pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If \cs. explain. NOT- TO ova xA10WLExN=—F_ 10. List any government 'approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. C0fVV1T10#\J,&W_ USE; rZP.M17- (5/-M O\JaK 5-:01 V^fzJANCC C677keEr FFcNT^se 6RAD/Ne 0 CLe".vvNe> PeqMJr- oemourlcw PEPMlr APr� l7reCTOP,^L. CE&IeN eoApo ^fpp�OV/A_ aum-otN6 ii�eezmtr 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask vou to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencie' t� s may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) c0&1m'E5Rc1,v_ cv—viewpmeN r op loyi=Aox 2_5 AC*Aes FZK AUM 0EALk!R6t#p 06r= PAOM,_,e� Aprf �V OM40IN6 ZI 00 sic L,A#q0�5C.,ASPtM6 ASN V 7 2 15 /V To To eF— Lr,._Er> FM AUTO C Z WIS H /Wo P/W5 / e4UP IS rOt"(5e- - 6E2Mer_> - LO 7- 70 R�-C U&eo ptA 12. Location of the proposal'. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. IZ211-30 PAC_/Rcl t*&f EDMON05 , W,*'- WAY -7 N� Ace 4 6W Y4 01= WC-770N Z117 I 7WP Z I - E.W.M. 7"� 15im t4es WC-ST 01M '00JO '^'c'T' OF ^"D 110,)ACIS;�4r- To -767tt A-Ve Ary 7Z) Hwy Jq ,SOUTH or- -Zzisr 6T. KW. _ . W . iNo josr - ) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. General description of the site (circle one) other ��Ilil[Y, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is tile steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? T0100 SLOPf5S �3P�Y JeAr5rWAeV Ar7- A Ct�e WRo/,arLL_y LE&S 7tt'VN 10"/10 EXCF-(OT- ON A SAAAL4__� M/P rO/Z770N 01= TIE S/77E wtfEP.F- zb - -w surFis 0,7, -2- , I T. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils arc found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. 19-1 f$ SO ILS SVAV�-_�y SIVOHOIAS�f (no. /A/ 01 C,^-ro_S ^UDF-MW000 UM12VIN 0 COMFLa X 2 — 0 110 S Q)p& S GLACJA1_ 77L-C, d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If -so, describe. NCT- TO CVR Kkk-WLEx)(se C. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any fillina or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of rdl. 41 P"Y"'KN45 &--- To ""IF-VE Fm VE1+1 r A ,t JT1 C/P 15ALAt%r,EC> CUT 4& FIQ-, IN EACESAS 0j= Snq CA..). f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so. generaliv describe. f0Tr—"Tt/44_ INCJ:kE� - 0 1 'VM"'16 e-,r-NGMVC,77Cf4 &fr A C15CAt5;%ff expECT-r--D MEW 0"my'ror= 1�s IMPRNP-MEWTS IVRE /N87-ALL.,eD. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 6-SPVS(,T `WD 150L-DW(5�_s h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if anv: 7r--MP01RAf MEASMES TO CON7N)L EAO&ON IIVC4-Vr->a SWIMOyr,,M6N FbNns / ZL-T"��R F�ENCE--- I 1Q'V-""'&01'J ZWALJE�5 ; PCJRM^AjeVqT- M INC-LVQ-: LANoScApttQ6 S7opMW^MR co�j7pol r OVTF Aii-C, AREA S 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust. automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If 11 any. generally describe and ive approximate qua 9 ntitici if known. WCOLC> e)E _[F_Mff�Y VEf*C()L-'AR EMVS-7- WWLD BC -P7�= /E)PIMAP TO 771C ^fk. 0= b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal'! if so, generally describe. Na6"C-;'1eL'E Afvw'-'� 0)"-- VIEEtt DLG7- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other Impacts to air, if any: 60� stwai ov I C, C�61 Alr;t5N &15 wick-, cwiP4� cusr -3- TO HE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. %Vater a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If %cs, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into' NO 2) Will the PTojecl require anN! %V0Tk over. in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please des.cribc and attach available plans. 3) Blimate The amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. N /A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NM TO O-)K KPCANLK�- EVALUATION FOR AGENCy USE ONLY 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. fnT mveLcpmeNr 5mgm mrvt, puocF_r_ m^\l copn�N SMeX_-'r 01L— AND VE2*45 WA5rbEU:> FI'OtM 6TPErtr bt7l,-- AND CCXAAECTEV Py STUZm b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. MJ\J AUTE��Tjm,)s 70 0:�ci)00 \NATs4z. piRIN6 64NZTRQC -ftb� T-ICN -0 IN-- MINJIMA.L, AND U)r_ALtZr=D AVj^cy \N^TM CvQC)(Tzot-Jz-> eHCVLV NOT Co^vee,. t4T C_-Rtopjo 2) Describe waste material that will be dischirgcd Into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sc%vlgc, industrial, containing the following chemicals . . ., agriculturil; ctc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the sYstcm(s) are expected to serve. NONE A TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source or runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ~F41-Y OF NNOFF WCVLo R5F pp�C" WlL0l1qC5 P4ZF5 AND F3tj%1P-0 45VAPACC-S . 71*5 WIL.4, R* c4LL,=CMr> ay LWO&R<Ep TpA1qSpMr6r> 7Z) ON S/Z 'WAJr> .SIVI* 6XF �A4 1�t� _ N AW 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. W7 . , d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: '00 VL4:7-j&A5 CCW67,vV6770,J1J AND A Co"6M&4 / AMA4 ME" 77eAJ SySrAM "V=M'vl 4. Plants a. Check or circle mes A�ofve etation found on the site: �X deciduous tree::61743er- maple) aspen, other _x evergreen treett, cedar, -p�inje other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vep getation will be removed or altered? MAJOf4'" OP NIE&F-TATtON CM 61TIE NNCLX0 16E fq--MAW�O EXCEPT" AT- FEfkl Pff&A%l OF 61M c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE, TO CL*, KWWt-F�� d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NE� N.W. IAV 1t4C>(rbP-N6VS 7D P—AACT' 5FF--60!�N 1V15y�jtr7r,--_% 70 CC /,tS NOTZ�o 0',', 't �eD LIVVD SC ZI 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, on birds other: ....... E� ... i:b ..................... mammals: deer, bear, elk. beaver, other: A. A..CMW I 1?f-=N7�j, I ......... ... .............. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: . N /A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE TO CUM j<kZWLeCee TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NOT TO MY2, rW0WLE0e*= d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE- MWfr&RU:> 6. Energ3' 2nd Natural Resources a. What kinds of encrg� lelectric- rimu"r-q-17--71 oil, wood stove, solar) will be used' to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for beating, manu- facturing, etc.. L1,LE-C-77R4cArt_ jWC> No�VA2,0SL, WZVLC> fl�p /C?7 ,tAel,4SA ENEP-41:q &VACES ()SE�O FM A51+77N6 C00"A16 L16M77A/C, /UV4C> OWtER MISC b. Would your project affect I the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? if so, generally describe. NC> C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Ag;= AS 69WVIRJE4=> 7V MJS�F-7— WA ST. EAJAK&V Cojoe 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of Fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NOT TO CM KNaNLEn51-- 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NMIN6 SreoAst- 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NCNF- naoRp�p b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? STMEeT Wass FY-ZVM orer,^71 ois 2) What t),pes; and levels of noise would be crcated by or associated Nvith the project on a short—tcrm or a long—term basis (for cxanipfc: traffic, construction. operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. &MT 7E4ZM (CON GTIRV C77 w IN7MRM1TMNTL%/ t*&H KM-t-4� W1W-4W_-> WURS I —ON& eV51mE6,5 F sEt,,V� At _J0 AC�Pln,�IAJ^( a V I Eft CULIR NOISC WILC, Apr) To 6xi ST7"6 NOISE, L. IN CLU M /V70 LCUC>- f L-A, <e/� /"D ,16r1_77VIRES r7r),0ZIAYA a_KtAJr-5-_ f-kV##Q.C, TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noisc impacts, if any: U5E OF f"JqE4t MuFF44FA Mvc-65 ,,VNr—> L,(M1rN6 AC NoPM.,orL- WA r— I N(5 t-bVRS WtL4 . MIAJIMIZ�p /AJ-PAc7-S 71 V, N 7D 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and ad' t ,,, _,pacen properties? E;KISTINC, AN/M/av- & 4OMP"V4 ANC> SURMCIVNID(NO L7sE_S 1A1cLVCe &10 6I1*JC4-0- & � -ro Eisr, oj= MI#JIVMS 70 5607H / AM16LF— PIVtCei— OWAJER,<,t*p To b. Has the site been usedfor agriculture? If so, describe. IWK771 ^0 &A)W. NOT 70 0-4-� KNkINLED45e c. Describe any structures on the site. /V\UMAt-- F1r-4X"6 &-S'"S�SS (2-) 6VILINM5S I 57r47-y WeM &AIC-i-e FoOMI S7VZArBe OVr> SMAU, \NO09 FF/M4a eL&4:>1N6 1N_6rtjC:> tWy d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? YES A.LL FKcerr (,2-) VVMD Fr-404E- . WLr->1AA!aS /A/ f 'Roff-P-7y e. What is the current zonine classification of the site? CG AJVr-> AM Z - 4- C ACZME 70 CG f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? comm"cmd, g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N /A 0 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Wr 70 OjR i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? /rR0N1M^TEL--/ 557 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? *7/EE5 /#JS30C/AM0 V-1- /15L77W, k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: NONE 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal Is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Pf-�M,5� IS COA4rA775Lk:, MTH <::CMMeF41A�— JD)=—VetCrMENr ALVN6 tt"Y. q67 —7— TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, Or low—income housing. N /A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low—income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NONE, 10. Aesthetics EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior buildi materia (s proposed? 21 r-7-. CCNC. 77LT Or W1 META-f- &Vr- 7 FYvza,4 . 6CASS 67VP&rJ*,,VN7- b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Nome- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: AWI&fE7765 WIU, A5K-_ Co'14rA77&k,= WhL CLA&1Evkq7- COMM�EACI-Ox_ DF-VeLq�IMEW7- ALOW6 t" el-q. 11. Light and Glare a '"'hat type or light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mai I 4� in y occur? N6tf7- 151TE � LJetMN(5 DOWCM0 lIV76 L4DT_. JE5U/LrYJJe t-I&ITtN(S \N(Q__, OE MMEAA� 5CAT4NA5D FIROM ejeStpE�Npottr b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off —site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? ,50MOL)NDIN6 /kP_SJPeNT7^i_ ^"D CCMA4e4RC1Arf__ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Wffll`� P03SIBL4E_� UC-YJr/N(S W(LA, A5F_ 5ffIff.4_oep or�, 5" AES10EVJ77^-L_ , al;�Ec 71ljE;D 12. Recreafion a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities arc in the immediate vicinity? LAK-r-- &'ISL�Nlor-A a'-'4' MILES 'SOUTH-. E&P9�",,WcF_= P6sx, '/I MiLE wEq-- EDMO�JC;�S t*C-'tf 3C(IM- V-Z- MILF_ 1q. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N(::) -0- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including rccrcati portunitics to be provided by the project or ap p'licant, if any: ion op- NONe- f9nOPO,5� 13. Historic and Cultural Preservittion a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state. or local prescr- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. 0. NOT* TO OUR, 1<f1J0WLF_06e b. Generally des'cribe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NON E TO 6M KAJOWLeo(ae c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: NONE 14. Transportation EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. Hl�=fWAy lq-q UIES aorsr AND ,�tDJACENr To 7Ha &7E ^ND oryge&$ ACCESS 'P 7HE SIM. -76,Tl+ I'WE Liss eetlkv Tte 5(Tl= V 7 7 #-= W C*T, b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop'? YCS ML� Ct:, HWy -7 47 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminat,c? rk6iffc,-r�= 1(y7poX. 4�, E�MfLoypae 57AU_,S 11NO Z4- USTOMEK LLIS d. Will the proposal require any ne%v roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not Includine drive%vays? If so. _,enerally describe (indicate whether public or private). A&f> NeW WA. �I� Er A'��-> 1AP-T_ OF 7Hf-= CraveLerMeNT e. Will the project use (or occur In the immediate vicinity of) water. rail, or air transporta- tion? If so, ,enerallv describe. NO F. How many vehicular trips per day %vould be generated by tile completed project'-' If known. Indicate %vhcn peak volumes wk)uld occur. r-m I Aver-A6P_ Poi-tLv Tr-44ps ;5ee A7pc� 7pApplc czqvp� TO HE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: IMPACVeMENT5 TC> 67P4e,-_T Fit�OiQr,-W�- 7M 511E� 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N6NE-= 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Jce, telephone, sanitary se-w6ri septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. ELE-r—Mcmy 5NOtIOMIsti CO. Pvo 66ss WA RATUNN_ CEAS WAT"� ]— c rN oF= ecmcw)s 6EANM PHON F_ eT E� C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: .................................. * REGISTERE ........ Date Submitted: ...... ARMTH IN VMINATO— OF WASHINGTON _10- . I . 4 REt,i:AVED JUN 15 1988 PLAN""'G, DEPT.. DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Prepared for: GROUP FOUR, INC. 19502 56th Ave. West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Prepared by: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th Ave. N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455-5320 January, 1988 I�A�S IS OUR 20 TH -"�(N/VERSP"�" TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE 1 CALCULATED LEVEL OF SERVICE DURING STREET TRAFFIC PEAK HOURS 6 TABLE 2 NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS BY LOCATION 7 FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP 8 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN FIGURE 3 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 10 FIGURE 4 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROJECT 11 FIGURE 5 PROJECTED 1988 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE PROJECT 12 ATTACHMENTS CITY OF EDMONDS FRONTAGE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY REPORTS (4 sheets) TP&E Staff Contributors to this Study: David H. Enger, P.E., Vice President Elden D. McCall, Transportation Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is a proposed new car sales facility to be located between Highway 99 and 76th Ave. W. in the City of Edmonds (See Figure 1). Per the preliminary site plan the pro- ject will include a new building of approximately 14,000 square feet and an existing building of approximately 4,300 square feet to be remodeled for the purpose of auto service (approximate to- tal 18,300 square feet). The proposed project is expected to be completed this year and have between 34 and 38 personnel em- ployed. Access to the site will be by driveways on Highway 99 and 76th Ave. West. The proposed facility will replace the existing Doug's Lynnwood Mazda facility, which is located on SR 99 at 208th St. S.W., approximately one mile north of the proposed site. The ex- isting facility has approximately 8000 square feet' of building floor area and about 30 employees. The reason for the move is the larger area of the proposed site. EXISTING CONDITIONS Highway 99 (SR 99) is a f ive lane major arterial. Access to 1-5 is by way of SR 99 and 220th St. S.W. to the 220th St. S.W. interchange, approximately 649 feet north and one mile east of the proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda site. The 1986 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on SR 99 at 244th St. S.W. was 36,100 accord- ing to 1986 Annual Traffic Report by the Washington, State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Highway 99 has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH and has street lighting on its east side. A bus stop (Community Transit routes 750 and 870) is located on the west side of SR 9.9 approximately 50 feet north- of the pro- posed site. I 76th Ave. W. is a two-lane minor arterial with curbs, gut- ters and sidewalks on both sides. The street has a curb to curb width of 44 feet and has parallel parking. The intersection with 220th St. S.W. is controlled by an actuated traffic signal sys- tem. The intersection with 224th St. S.W. is controlled by a four-way stop, however, the westbound right -turn -only lane is per- mitted free movement. I Approximately 660 feet south of the proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda site SR 99 intersects 224th St. S.W. and is controlled.by an actuated traffic signal system. At this intersection the northbound and southbound approaches on SR 99 are both comprised of one left -turn lane, two through lanes, and a separate right - turn lane. 224th St. S.W. is a two-lane facility classified as a minor arterial. At its intersection with SR 99 the eastbound and west- bound approaches both have a through/left-turn lane, and a right - turn only lane. At its intersection with 76th Ave. W. the westbound lanes consist of a through/left-turn lane and a right - turn only lane, while the eastbound approach is comprised of a single lane for all three movements. . Existing PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 3. The volumes at the 76th Ave. W./224th St. S.W. and SR 99/224th St. S.W. intersections are from manual counts taken by TP&E on Thursdayf January 14, 1988 and Tuesday, January 19, 1988 respec- tively. The volumes shown for the 76th Ave. W./220th St. S.W. in- tersection are based on counts taken by the City of Edmonds in July, 1987. The street traffic PM peak hour was determined to be 4:30-5:30 Pm. The PM peak hour volumes shown on Figure 3 were 2 balanced to eliminate the discrepancies between counts taken at different times. Table 1 shows the PM peak hour calculated level -of service (LOS) for each of the pertinent intersections. LOS is a qualitative term that describes the operating conditions that a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway. It is specified on six different levels ranging from A (optimum flow conditions) to F * (extreme congestion). Level of Service C is typically used for design purposes, although in urban areas LOS D is acceptable for short periods of time such as the AM and PM peak hours. The calculated levels of service were performed by using an FHWA computer program for the Highway Capacity Manual method. The signalized intersections, 76 th Ave. W./220th St. S.W. and SR 99/224th St. S.W., were analyzed using a cycle length of 120 and 148 seconds respectively. Traffic accident data was obtained from WSDOT and the City of Edmonds. Between 1984 and the midpoint of 1987 there were a total of 126 accidents within the project study area (see Table 2). . Of these accidents, 117 occurred on SR 99; the predominant accident was the rear -end collision, which is not uncommon for a high volume signalized street system. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT The proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is expected to generate approximately 869 vehicular trips on an average weekday at full occupancy. This volume is based on data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in Trip Generation - An Informational Report (third edition, 1982). A vehicle trip is defined as "A single or one -directional vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the 3 study site." Based on the same data, the project will generate approximately 71 trips. during the AM street traffic peak hour and 84 trips during the PM street traffic peak hour. For the PM street traffic peak hour, 36 trips will be entering and 48 trips will be exiting the site. Figure 4 shows the expected distribution of the PM peak hour traffic volumes generated by the Doug's Lynnwood Mazda. Figure 5 presents the 1988 PM peak hour traffic volumes on the adjacent streets with the proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda. These f igures are based on . the assumption that 50 percent of the site -generated trips are diverted from the existing traffic volumes on the adja- cent streets. Since the existing Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is near- by, many of the employees and customers presently use the streets in the vicinity of the proposed site. Based on the assumption above the LOS for all relevant inter- sections were calculated for the PM peak period in 1988. The re- sults are displayed in Table 1. At the SR 99 driveway the left turn movements will operate at LOS D and E during the PM peak hour due to the heavy southbound opposing traffic volume on SR 99. At the signalized intersections it is apparent. that the traf- fic volumes generated by Doug's Lynnwood Mazda are low compared to the existing traffic. The impact of Doug's Lynnwood Mazda on the pertinent intersections will not be significant, and will not change the calculated 1988 PM peak hour levels of service CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The traffic generated by Doug's Lynnwood Mazda is not expect- ed to cause any major traffic problems. The slight increase of 4 traffic will not have any effect on the LOS at the existing inter- sections on 76th Ave. W. or SR 99. The traffic volumes expected to use the 76th Ave. W. driveway are so low that turn lanes or other traffic control improvements will not be needed. The LOS (D & E) for the left turning movements at the SR 99 driveway are tolerable and will not have any effect on the overall LOS on SR 99. The existing two way left turn lane on SR 99 in front of the site will facilitate left turns to and from the driveway. A right turn lane on SR 99 into the site is not warranted due to. the low right turn traffic volumes. However, the City of Edmonds does require that the SR 99 Frontage Development Standard be implemented, a copy of which is attached. The required 11.5 foot asphalt concrete shoulder extending along the front of the proposed site will insure uninterrupted flow for southbound traf- f ic on SR 99 by serving as an acceleration. and deceleration lane for southbound vehicles entering or exiting the site. Eventually this paved shoulder may be converted into a through traffic lane and/or a high occupancy vehicle lane. The two driveway approaches from the proposed project site shall be constructed to meet the City of Edmonds ;Development Standards. We recommend that the driveway along SR 9'9 be at least 30 feet wide, as indicated on the site plan, and have a curb radius of at least 15 feet. During field observation at the 76th Ave. W./224th St. S.W. intersection (four-way stop controlled), the existing intersec- tion traffic control devices appeared to be confusing to drivers entering the intersection. In particular, potential conflicts were observed on the north leg of the intersection between west- bound right turning vehicles, which face a right turn green ar- row, and eastbound left turn. vehicles, which normally would have 5 q the right-of-way over the channelized westbound right turning traffic. Several traffic control alternative improvements are possible, including striping for two northbound lanes north of the intersection to separate the flows. Another alternative would be to remove the right turn green arrow and install a yield sign for the westbound right turn. The City should continue to monitor the situation to determine if and when improvements should* be made. We recommend that N-way" signs (RI-3) be in- stalled below all "Stop" signs at this intersection. 6 TABLE 1 Calculated Level of Service (LOS) During 1988 Street Traffic PM Peak Hours Intersection SR 99/Site Driveway SR 99/224th St. S.W. 76th-Ave. w./220th St. S.W.* 76th Ave. W./Site Driveway 76th Ave. W./224th St. S.W. Without Project Signalized intersection With Project D (left in) A (right out) E (left out) C C D D A (all turns) B B RN TABLE 2 Number of Accidents by Location Recorded by Washington State Department of Transportation and the City of Edmonds 1984 1985 1986 1987 * Total intersection of SR 99/220th St. S.W. 14 9 18 6 47 on SR 99 between 220th St. S.W./ 224th St. S.W. Intersection of SR 99/224th St. S.W. Intersection of 76th Ave. w./ 220th St. S.W. On 76th Ave. W. between 220th St. S.W./ 224th St. S.W. Intersection of 76th Ave. W./ 224th St. S.W. Total 14 13 7 11 6 11 2 36 6 34 0 0 2 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 3 40 30 39 17 126 First half of 1987 only. C) lop Ll �2 00 SW . ..... IL 199TH ST""W 2_wf v0t.q.;�o4-il 200TH IT too S�T > > > 4:( 201ST ST S 20 I STI, P T U SW 01 202NO ST A CADE C3 3: 202NO ST SW cc I.- 202NO f 'All Y' SW' COMMUNI SW_ PL SW lu, 5�`lp S W � 1"Ll T 31' no, r L c OLLEG C3 v C" V OR L M2 P S Ng vNik PL .j: TH ST Sw MAD 204M ST < Af ad Sw L TH Sw s X 204TH: p Q_ 205TH S W rit, 205T"; il f 3:1 < 3: plz PL SIN -J ST 9W N1. ll� - . a CL > mm ST r > SW :.;,6 > 99 > C 207TH ST SW V4 C p t s VA ro, x z L -H2j 77�, n A ae: > K Sw T 2WTH �4 ST a* S sw tkJ,--, 4:. '1 _... % 209 H "' : ::.v " 5 cc > -IRvIAXA.: > PL SW 0 cc) 210 PL Sw > cc Sw 2MTji T <�S v 0 �Tls*w, X (L z Pt S", !> 211 -LJ FS ;; 0 Sw I > Sl -sw I 212TH ST T SW c R EDMONDS> W;i RDplo 77" �2 3 ST SIN < S%3TH)LC l'_7i;i /of w [A TH HS I 2 4TH PL SE; -11-PAI "or PLSW- PL. 2 2140 H Z, .w 3: 215TH ST 214Tt loe A s �T Sw. Was EVE-NS i7TH PROPOSED SITE PL 218Tt 218TH ST S 219T fcL Ln T t; L19TH ST S% CC 9TH 22 TH ST w 8 0 C3 ST SW I : .41> 220TH-ST 2-20 H Sw ST 220 PL cc KINGS 220TIl rfmfu Sw 221 ON 221ST rL Zc 221 ST Hosp 211ra PL.. Pi N PL Sw 222NO ST .. 3 ISJ _.: �: A - 17J SIN ZZ2ND ;--ST. Un 223R ST CT S flu & CL. c I > > 5% L !S f A .0, p ...0. f 3: m > > 3t CHASE > L w S ST Sw > K. t� A 3: IST W; z 0 225 1226TVi ---pL 4m 225TH x 3c .9 L S -,J > STH PL �. 7 S. Sw 0 PL > �66" L22ML Alti—T' — to CC z IL z pf s H 227k. PL Sw > nU_HST 22&� co co > 51 1.. . — . 228kH < ST 229, 3: STI.:.. 229T11 St 2 9TH ST j P > > > < 4p -x X Sw 2 9TH PL Sw R Z3 TH 7Z) BRAD- is, !3 23's L Sw ST SW 0 10 LEY RD T. 3: 2NO 99 231ST L SW 232NO PL SW k 'A�_ PO N , S ;w (40—LLYLN, ST SW > > x USE -.233RD P L 3� x A .'a 12331 6 732W 4. J:: 2; ST SIN VE :cjjl F., Sw I r sw z 234TH 234TH -7—L Sw J. LAS LH 3: -S 236-1 H_Sl_ SA t cc > � FL 237T SW X 9 .4 N . i " -el VICINITY MAP DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE 1 1 zl� SITE PLAN DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS y toe—^ JOW".. ('F! GU RE 2 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE PROJECT f-1 � DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE 0) C111 U) 2 -8 22 —442 —336 —653 — 3 5 220th St. SW 326— 7 --.w 230 397 1 t r ) u-) 22 t.() C) (14 tr) 221st St. SW vv 2 221 d St. SW 5 PROJECT SI TE ,--5 —32 N 19 9 9 not to scole (0 > (0 (N 3 18 0 80 8 Cl —124 110 -411 76 76 A-12 31 I 187 224th St. SW 9 6 - ) t ( 24 159 55 39 16 N C4 (.0 43 to Vv PROJECTED 1988 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE PROJECT DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FIGURE 5 223 goo 00 9 Frorl+CnE \k-IoFcrflev,� Enc�'ineevinq UN. ------------- ;0-1 CiArIg 1�/w c.s! 0.54 half -Troovel c Itj 15tA Tk iclk- �lw.,N-, 99 -IVical �Aalf (Tj N 0-re, i�;) — Man+419 5trip +0 \Oz - \anctsca?.e,1 par A�r-ck. .,fie altv U.5cj +0 10c"OAC, 119\("� pole!�-, W*lr*.vi or 5j�vid( pol&5 -bre, V1yAfaK-L%s WaI&Y, e.+C. i5icl e- Aal k- 6topea aj Y41 pey- r; tnAs drain I .5r 01. 6i+\, c>i Scimo,(jjs Stay-, !�c CA, Ov-% So. Ocs ,--) I — 0-pp t5visineer locz�% t'; J. rewiew ~ . ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT - INTERSECTION..220TH � ST. SW/76TH AVE . , . ~ � AREA TYPE..... ` ANALYST ....... EDM - DATE .......... 1/21/88 TIME .......... 4:30-5:30 PM � COMMENT ....... EXISTING PM PK HR CONDITIONS (7/6/87) __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 74 34 33 145 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.0 � TH 230 336 307 181 : TR 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 RT 22 282 18 73 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 2' 113 2 29 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 __________________________________________________________________________ _ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYFE K) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 6 0.90 14 Y 13.6 3 - WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0' 0.90 6 Y 13.6 4 ' NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 3 Y 13.6 4 SB 0.00 3.00 N 0 0 0.90 15 Y 13.6 3 . ________________-_______________-_________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 P.-3 PH-4 _ EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PI) X � WB LT X SB LT X ' � TH X TH X RT X RT X PI) X PI) X GREEN 15.4 32.8 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 29.8 0.0' 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------- ______________-_-________ � nn LEVEL OF SERVICE � LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP.' LOS � EB . LTR � 0.866 0.128 43.0 E 43.0 'E � WB LT 0.870 0.273 33.3 D 25.2 D R 0.244 0.522 7.4 B NB LT 0.874 0.250 35.3 D 33.9 D R 0.023 0.523 6.5 B ' SB LT 0.867 0.248 38.1 D 35.4 . D R 0.090 0.377 15.6 C __________________________________________________________________________ - INTERSECTION: Delay = 33.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.870 LOS = D 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..224TH ST. SW/HIGHWAY 99 AREA TYPE,.... ANALYST ....... EDM DATE .......... 1/21/88 TIME .......... 4:30-5:30 PM COMMENT ....... EXISTING PM PK HR CONDITIONS (1/19/88) VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 24 31 311 93 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 L 13.0 L 13.0 TH 39 76 1609 1170 : R 11.0 R 11.0 T 11.0 T 11.0 RT 43 80 27 51 : 12.0 12.0 T 11.0 T 11.0 RR 10 10 10 10 : 12.0 12.0 R 11.5 R 11.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _________________________________________________________________ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ^ ADJUSTMENT FACTOR5 GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE , K) Q) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 . 0, 0.90 10 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 25.8 ' ! NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 13.6 4 SB 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 13.6 4 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH ------ = 148.0 - PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X ' TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X X WB LT X GB LT X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X X � GREEN 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 41.4 68.5 9.8 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 _________________-___~-�_________________________-_______________-_________ 0.0 �0.0 0.0 YELLOW 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE . LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 1.004 0.117 113.9 F 87.9 F R 0.215 0.117 38.3 D ' WB LT ' 0.746 0.117 50,6 E 46.6 E R 0.456 0.117 40.5 E NB L 0.726 0.273 40.8 E 11.1' B T 0.718 0.756 5.7 B R 0,017 0.756 2.1 A SB L 0.895 0.066 88.5 F 18.9 C ` T 0.719 0.549 14.1 B R __________________________________________________________________________ 0.05S 0'549 7.3 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.766 LOS = C ° ^ � . . 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS . SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..224TH ST. SW/HIGHWAY 99 AREA TYPE ..... ANALYST ....... EDM DATE .......... 1/21/88 TIME .......... 4:30�5:30 PM COMMENT ....... FURURE __________________________________________________________________________ 1988 PM PK HR CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT ' VOLUMES : GEOMETRY ' . EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 24 31 313 93 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 L 13.0 L 13.0 TH 39 76 1617 1179 : R 11.0 R 11.0 T 11.0 T� 11.0 RT �� 43 80 27 51 : 12.0 12.0 T 11.0 T � 11.0 RR10 10 10 10 : 12.0 "0 R 11.5 R 11.5 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -____-____________________________________________________________�____ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Q) Q> Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T , EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 .10 Y 13.6 4 SB 0.00 2.00 __________________________________________________________________________ N 0 0 0.90 10 Y 13.6 4 _ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 148.0 � PH-1 PH-2 .PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT % NB LT X TH % TH X X . RT X RT X X PD X PD X X ' WB LT X . SB LT X ` TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PD X PD X X GREEN 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 41.4 68.5 9.8 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 ---------------------- ------------------------ 0.0 0.0 YELLOW --------------- 2.0 3.0 3.0 00 LEVEL OF SERVICE _____------------- _ LANE GRP. V/C 8/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LT 1.004 0.117 113.9 F 87.9 F R 0.215 0.117 38.3 D WB LT 0.746 0.117 50.6 E 46.6 E R 0.456 0.117 40.5 E, NB L 0.731 0.273 41.0 E 11.1 B T 0.722 0.756 5.7 11 R 0.017 0.756 2.1 A SB L 0.895 0.066 88.5 F 19.0 C T 0.724 0.549 14.2 B R 0.056 __________________________________________________________________________ 0.549 7.3 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.769 1 LOS = C * " � }� ^ ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTlONLI. SUMMARY REPORT lNTERSECTION..220TH ST. SW/76TH AVE. W AREA TYPE..... ANALYST ....... EDh DATE .......... 1/21/98 TIME .......... 4:30-5:30 PM COMMENT ....... __________________________________________________________________________ FUTURE 1988 PM PK HR CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WE N8 SD : EB WB NB SP LT 74 35 33 145 : LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.0 LT 11.0 TH 230 336 308 182 : TR 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 R 11.0 RT 22 282 22 73 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 R,R 2 11a 2 29 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.(� : 12.0 1z.0 12.0 12.(::, � 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE pY ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS FED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nt: Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 14 Y 13.6 3 WE 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 6 Y 13.6 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 .0 0.90 3 Y 13.6 4 SB .0.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.00 N 0 0 0.90 15 Y 13.6 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.� PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 FH-4 EB LT Y NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PC X WB LT X SB LT X TH. X TH X RT X PT X PD X PD X GREEN 15.4 32.8 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 29.8 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3,0 3.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 Q.(-*! ' LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. Y!C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY A.P. LOE EB LrR 0.266 0.128 43.0 E 43.0 E WE( LT 0.872 0.273 33.5 D 25.4 D R 0.244 0.522 7.4 B NB LT 0.S77 0.250 35,5 D 33.8 D R 0,029 0.523 6.5 B SB LT 0.870 0.248 38.4 D 35.7 D 5 0,090 0.377 15.6 C __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTIUN; Delay = 33.4 (sec/veh) V.'C = 0.872 (- LOS = D RCV BY:GROUP FOUR, -INC. ;11-11-88 ;12:17PM CCITT G3- 2063623819;# 2 AMMASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCE61 INC November 10, 1988 Project No. 8806-31 Mr. Doug Ikegami. c/o Geometrix Architects/Planners 140 Rainier Avenue South Suite C Renton, WA U 0-5-5. Subject: Parking Area Pavement Design Doug's Lynnwood Mazda 22130 Highway 99 North Edmonds, Washington Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to provide a pavement design for the parking area at Doug's Lynnwood Mazda in Edmonds, Washington. The majority of the parking and access areas are underlain by sands and gravels and in a few areas by sandy silts. These materials exhibit varying densities and were observed to be relatively loose to medium dense. As such, some remedial measures will be necessary for support of pavement. For non-public projects, the owner has the choice in that pavement support design is a compromise between 1) high initial cost with little maintenance 'and 2) lower first costs coupled with the need for periodic repairs. It is our intention to. provide a design that will give long-term service with a minimum of customer inconvenience due to necessary repairs. Some of the factors which govern the durability of a' surfacing include subgrade density and stability, presence of moisture, average traffic volume, and frequency of heavy vehicle use. There was no evidence of any near surface ground water during our exploration of the site as stated in our Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Report dated August 10, 1988. The traffic volume and heavy vehicle use are expected to be minimal for the parking area. Thus, improving the subgrade density will be the key to a durable surfacing. Initially, the upper 12 inches of the existing soils should be compacted to 95 percent of the Modified Proctor Maximum Density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. The new layer of compacted soil would distribute wheel loads�over a broader area and reduce pavement flexing. The sandy silts around exploration pit EP-5 and EP-7 (as shown on above noted report) will need to be removed to the depth of 903 - 5TH AVENUE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 827-7701 RCV BY:GROUP FOUR, INC. ;11-11—B8 ;12:17PM CCITT G3- 2063623819;# 1 the underlying gravelly sands and replaced with structural fill compacted to 95 percent density. This depth was -approximately 1 to 2 feet in our exploration pits, however it 'may be deeper in other areas. Excess gravelly sands from around the site will be suitable for use as structur,al fill. The fill should be placed in 8-inch maximum lease lifts and compavLcd aw upecifled above. T1 during compaction, any portign Qf the rrite is found txi be, &.xt;r.-imivr1Y Rnff. tht- ari-m should be overexcavated and harkfillFad with e-omparted structural fill. After subgrade preparation is completed, a total of 4 inches of 5/8- inch minus crushed leveling course should be placed and compacted to 95 percent of Maximum Density (ASTM:D 1557). Two inches of Washington State Class B asphaltic concrete pavement should then be placed to complete the pavement section. - A representative from our firm should inspect the pavement subgrade and placement of the leveling course material and 'perform a representative number of in -place density tests. In this way, soil compaction may be evaluated and any problem areas can be corrected prior to paving. Representative samples of the pavement subgrade and leveling course materials must be provided to Associated Earth Sciences, In&. a minimum of 48 hours before field density tests are required so that the laboratory compaction standard (Proctor value) can be determined. We are confident that this pavement design will be suitable for the intended usage. We have enjoyed working with you on this project and'should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Jamey S. Battermann, Geotechnical Engineer Gary T. Lo Principal JSB/db 8806-31A Dkll/1/88 . r1)owz 11, P.E. , .G. F— I- L080, VAS - #I/. 45 � ?sit P4AL IL -At 2 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC 2101-112th AVENUE N.E., SUITE 110 —BELLEVUE, WASH I NGTON 98004 VICTOR H. BISHOP P.E. TELEPHONE 455-5320 — AREA CODE 206 President March 4, 1988 Mr. Chris H. Beckman Engineering Coordinator CITY OF EDMONDS -��A\S IS OUR 250 - 5th Ave. N. b, 0 TH Edmonds, WA 98020 FNIGINEERING 2 '%NIVERSNO Re: Proposed Doug's Lynnwood Mazda Highway 99 between 220th St. S.W. and 224th St. S.W. Dear Mr. Beckman: Pursuant to your recent telephone conversations with Mr. Elden McCall of our staff, we are providing information supplemen- tal to our January, 1988 traffic study report on the above - referenced project. The centerline of the proposed site driveway on 76th Ave. W. will be located approximately 40 feet south of the site's north property line. As scaled from a small-scale property map of the area, this will place the driveway centerline approximately 12 feet north of the centerline of 222nd St. Southwest. The pro- posed driveway will essentially intersect 76th Ave. W. within the existing 76th Ave. W./222nd St. S.W. tee intersection. The slight offset of 12 feet north of the 222nd St. S.W. centerline is better than an offset to ' the south would be, considering the turning paths required for'left turns. The proposed driveway is expected to carry fewer than 20 vehicles during the peak hour, an average of less than one vehicle every three minutes. Due to the low volume nature of the proposed driveway, we expect it to oper- ate well. The PM peak hour site -generated traffic volume distribution shown in Figure 4 of our report is based on existing traffic vol- umes and flow patterns in the area, and is merely an estimate of future conditions. Some variation of future traffic volumes will occur, just as existing traffic volumes vary from one day . to the next. Some street segments shown on Figure 4 as not carrying any site -generated peak hour traffic, such as 224th St. S.W. east of Highway 99, may end up carrying some site traffic, but we expect the volumes to be less than 10% of the total site generation. These traffic volume variations will be insignificant, and are not expected to change the levels of service at the intersections. Mr. Chris H. Beckman CITY OF EDMONDS March 4, 1988 Page -2- It is our understanding that analysis of the Highway 99/220th St. S.W. intersection was conducted by others, so the City did not request that we re -analyze the intersection.. The im- pact of this project on that intersection is not expected to be significant. As stated in the report, we estimate that only about half of the traffic generated by the proposed site will be new traffic added to the.adjacent street network. Since Doug's Lynnwood Mazda will be relocating from its existing site located approximately one mile north on Highway 99, many of the employees and customers of the business are already using Highway 99 adja- cent to the proposed site. Please contact me or Elden McCall if you have any questions. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. iqa4_� 2,v<, cr,� David H. Enger, P.E., Vice President' DHE: mb cc: Steve Anderson, Group Four, Inc. " .�q �k,-7 Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM April 11, 2001 File ADB-97-23 Street File 22130 Highway 99 Steve Bullock 10� Senior Planner ADMMSTRATIVE APPROVAL OF TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT FOR DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA. Based on my site inspection of the Doug's Mazda site, I believe that one of the two trees is a hazard and would be allowed to be removed without any replacement. The second tree, a large fir, appears to be in decent health, but I can see the applicant concern and desire to removed it due to the damage it can and is inflicting on their inventory. With that in mind, their proposal to remove that tree and replace it with 3 incense cedars is appropriate if they are installed at 8' in height. Because the proposal will not significantly change the existing character of the development, I am administratively approving the Design Review element of this project. Attachments: Site Plan City of Edmonds (-Q Planning Division 97023SR.DOC 04/11101. nougs L-4nnujoco maZDa/suzuKi HUMMER/H,eumai April 11, 2001 Planning Department City of Edmonds 121-5'h Avenue North Edmonds, WA. 98020 Atten: Steven Bullock, Sr. Planner Dear Steve: I have enclosed a site plan of our property, Doug's Lynnwood Mazda, showing the two trees that we feel are a hazard. As discussed with you on the site, we will plant at least three trees to provide screening for the apartments on the other side of the property line to replace the two trees to be cut down. If available, we will plant incense cedars or similar trees within the next two or three months which will not create a similar proble m* in the years to come. Thank you for taking the time to come out to survey the situation. (-Ny,off,s truly, "I, y � � 4,Z I Pat Ikegamii 11-4 7D -6c- 614477, APPROVED BY --Z 22130 HIWAY 99 - EDMONDS, WA 98026-8042 - (425) 774-3551 - 1-800-827-0868 - SEATTLE #: (206) 523-3885 - FAX #: (425) 774-9429 - WWW.DOUGS.COM -r_ CG2 F7 TT J, /A F, 7L Ry iz 032 'i -4;L Vt 0 �7 r1l .7 V - �547Lt ?'LA�-j - R-2-89 Ikegami fi) It - 6 T -31 I --.GROUP OURIn.' 19502 - 56th Avenue West .Lynnwood, Washington 98036 FAX (206) 362-3819 - (206) 775-4581 - (206) 362-4244 HYDRAULIC REPORTAND CALCULATIONS EDMONDS MAZDA L nwood, WAshingfio_ n YP Group% Four job No," 87-4525 Prepared For: Doug lkegami- 20700 Highway 99 Lynnwood, WA.,*98036. Prepared By: August 2, 1988 &-wep 884 % Ok L I JA6 SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT ,Edmonds Mazda 8-2-88 87-4525 Pg. 1/1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION The site -is located north of the intersection of Highway 99 and 76th Avenue West and is comprised of 3.53 acres. The property currently contains eight existing structures, two of,which were used as a mink pelting facility. The site is bordered on the north by apartment complexes and residential housing. The south side of the property is bounded by a condominium development and a fiberglass repair shop. The ground is comprised of evergreen trees with moderate ground coverage. Topography slopes to the east with an average slope of approximately 5%. EXISTING DRAINAGE Drainage consists of runoff from the site into the system along Highway 99. Currently no drainage system exists on the site and there is no contributing runoff into the site from outside areas. PROPOSED DRAINAGE Conveyance pipe and structures have been sized for the 10 year design storm. The detention vault has been sized for a 10 year design storage and a 10 year release. All runoff will be conveyed to the detention vault except areas to the west and north which will be left undeveloped. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Release from the vault will be conveyed into a 1211 pipe drainage system currently existing on Highway 99 where it will continue south approximately 6001 to the intersection of Highway 99 and 224th Street. It appears that from here the rele ' ase may be conveyed southeasterly to Ballinger Lake. Judging from the capacities of the downstream roadside drainage system, the proposed development will have minimal impact on downstream systems. bA C3 1-3 U 0. a Pl-- 11-4 _A%�. OIJ_11� 6- o 7-4! L_ Alum- a as, ovir w 32S. SG <Typ� ca EXT. M"MC. CUFM JM.x is 0 Narcr'W4 ps 41, r lwv.'-3'5z.15 YIPS I �Y: S E D IbWILDI WCx 0) PRO I I A I I Ll 1w pq -Z! rg J 1,6 zo, 'LD. -15 IN DGTE AStwek L.F-WTKlr-qG -� w I? i5mt T Tylp 45, 5 TOP a df- '3'r. 00 94 /m000. V .9. v" SUSBASim AP glewga -A STORM DRAIN STORAGE REQUIREMENTS A acres Area of Basin C Existing coefficient of imper/yusness,of e �C 07 1 14 02 _1 114 Basin ground 13 -7 -7 C 0.77 Developed coefficient of mperviousness of d Basin as planned 9 3 —70 0 r L 36>0 feet Length (maximum) oi�foverlarnd travel S % Slope (avera ) from Basin high point to low point (on ercourse) V ft/sec. Runoff te r I T c minutes m of concentration from formula: (L -' V r (60)) = T c I in/hr. 11 intensity from rainfall curve 10 - ar storm) Qe cfs Existing outflow from site using equation: e 10 e Q0 047.1 C Maximum outflow permitted per acre imperviousness from formula: Q0 = Qe -L AC d Tto 44. minutes Storage. time (to capacity) from formula: T ZS7 Vs .14 7�� c-F"/A/C Required volume of storagp per acre in Basin dI from equation: 'Vs =-Z /4,0 40 Qo Vt 7 ,OZ,2— cubic feet Required volume of storage for this Basin from equation: Vt = VsACd z0,A 8 0 7C (Z - 5� CF= > 0 tz- STORM DRAIN STORAGE REQUIREMENTS 410 C.) 6 51 A acres. Area,of Basin (DF=Uauq3ia�� C Existing coefficient of imperviousness of e. Basin ground IS-7516 913 1119 OCI C d _7'6 -7 Developed coeffici-ent of imperviousness of Basin as planned 1 L 3 6 C.) feet Length (maximum) of overland travel S % Slope (average) from Basin high point to low point -(on watercourse) V ft/sec. Runoff rate r Tc = minutes Time of concentration from formula: 10 + (L + V (60)) = T r c 1 = 1,.S7 in/hr. Rainfall intensity from rainfall curve 10 (10-year storm) Qe = 0':Cj cfs Existing outflow from site usi.ng equation: C e I Q e 10'A Q0 47 cfs Maximum outflow permitted per acre imperviousness from formula: Q0 = Q AC d e T 50. 9 minutes Storage time (to capacity) from formula: T 6 Vs 19 4(o cf/A/ Cd Required volume of storage per acre in Basin from equation: V = 4-3Z9 7- S 4-0 Q'I T_ Vt cubic feet Required volume of storage for this Basin from equation: V t V AC d UOUL-1 f P F Gm? cp -Z�7 _35 - -------- - 0 3,03c1cf=- '7 3,0V 0 YEAR DESIGN STORM YIEAR DEtIGN STORR PEAY S'TOGGE KAXIMUM ST%Gf-' -[W E OF OUTLET STORAGE MAXIMUM STO�AG� Typ t..REA 7PEAK TIME (1-,1.NUTES) VOLUME (FT3/AC) TORIFICE TIME WNUTES) VOLUME AC) -IF?? CIS ys USL FOR VITH HEAD ),�TM HEAD _25+� T--25. y 7 —0 3607 T 11 Q.T 2706. rT --25+ 4329 T 40 T: Qo 110' 1�11 I 'I'll CONSTANT FLOW 1503 ys 3607 T 6 0 04 1804 —0 ys 4329 T COUITY T 2 5 . Q10T -T-+T5- T-25 + — 60 -Q01 T 48 r-A 01" 0 6?A, 4-ID pt�F-Iorlc- Ok"T-F:I, �,j 4, Ag, rL- 1.26 Riser Inflow Cur"Ves = MEW 10111111 Legend Weir flow. Q.-9.739 DrH3/2 ........... ;. Orifice flow. 0,-3.782 qH 7-, 7.7 man MINIBOOM] Milli In 111 Source: USDA-SCS I 111-73 Plate 1.26h �--LDVt4O"D-C- MA?-DA 37- 4--� A 0. Z,6 !I f-4 sx.,'�4 LOA v,,, AL- T=F 14-6 cF IOT-A-A- VL OT-ttil SOIL EROSION POTENTIAL HYDROLOGIC GROUP K FACTOR rwo 0 d Aiderwood d e t e Beausite e a Bellin hatm Briscot M, moderate-se,'vere m o de, r ate moderate-very severe m 0 de r a t(R sliaht j c .20 B .15 c .24- sl I t slight slight I E c B/C uckle. B uc 1 t Earlmont Edgewick Everett sl jg t slight slight moderate -severe B/C B A .10 'Lc .. u4" Indianola u moderate -severe .. A .24 a moderate -severe I c c .37 EKitsEEj Klaus 1 slight slj B .2.0 Neilton sliqht-moderate B .15 Newberg slight B — Nooksack B —..slight Norma slight_ B/C .23 a s Orcas none none D .05 idia Oridia sli ht slight— c Severe c .28 Ovall Pilchuck moderate -severe A .10 - �slight IVC 32 - Pucfet PuVallup slight B .28 Raqnar mo derate-severe A .32 slight B/C Renton Salal slight B Sammamish--none c ff.2 Seattle none c Shalcar� Slight c 4 Slight slight slight B Sil .Snohomish ::::D .17 c .3/ C Sul-,__�n — --------- sl light D Tukwila C/D --Slight Woodinville ___ 45. 1p TEMPORARY SEDIMENT PONDS — NOMOGRAPH 1 (RUNOFF VOLUME) TYPE 1A STORM AREA pa L.W. p *IV 4 so or .0 ZS 3.0 FF — INCHES 0. 500- all < /000- 44 /-500— z r14 2 o oo - z 25oo- :D am 3000-: BAS-D UPON A TIME OF CONCENTRATION OF .25 HR. > 4000 4500- 0 E-4 U) 43. kill Is@ .25 35 30 45 1 17 50 --45- 35 35 30 25 40 45 20 35 2—YEAR — 24—HR. PRECIPITATION PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OF AN EVERETT 15 1 20 25 L 30 35 SEATTLE 35 4 5 p 50.1 so. 45 60 )20 35 3 TACOMA �40 � - I 5, � 1 35 i�25 - �� 5 30 40 35 0 30 35e 30 35 5 .2 40 40 45 - 45 45 35 0, 45 %X50 5 0 35 40 U �45 45 30 50, 7- 4 ( - . 'I.Lf (.5. n 3 0 35 3 125 30 45 3 5 .5 40 (\35 3 ) / - 1\ I �\\ - 25 30 20 15 20 15 c 1! "ST"""" -IFIC'' WATER WORKS. SUPPLY Co. A06 Fi ls�f- Ave. So. NC. 77 Seattl-.4, Wash. 6440 S. W- Macadam Ave. MA. 4-6933 Portland 11 Oregon CH. 4-7529 ------------- Parcel SEc. 29, Twp- 27, Range 4 1241 of the west 112 Of the SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SW 1/4 LESS ROAD. i-4 Parcel 2: Sec. 29 �0- N-J--9 TwP. 27, Range 4, RT 14 Beginning 6651 S of the NW cOrner NW 1/4, SW 1/4, thence E 34111 thence N 1211 thence W 1071 S 61, thence W 230, 9 thence thence S 751 to point of beginnning, LESS 301 for road. A Vic Asbestos Cement — Cost Iron — Steel — Plastic Pipe — Hydrants Valves — Bross Goods — Meters DATE RECEIV�tt-PERMIT EXPIRES lip, ID Z� CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE CG 21- I CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION -NUMBER JOB T# ADDRESS (I 7"z,- ( ?jj tiA,� 60 OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. 0, LID FEE $ MAILING ADDReAst z PUBLIC.,Q!GHT OFIWAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved 0 RW Permit Required 0 Street Use Permit Req'd 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required 0 Sidewalk Required 0 V-^ 0 T5 REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT I Underground re rn 0 q,'red,, NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURE PRV RE UIRED YES 0 NO 0 a 3 ILI ADDRESS REMARKS z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME MENGIN�ERING REVIEWED/DATE ADDRESS 5ov 4 cc FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE UJI W ZIP 2 TELEPHONE 1W/_/S25 Vo - r� z 0 S I - r LL VA R" �ORCU . SHORELINE OR ADB# - INSPECTION REO'D BOND D TE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DIE V-6-1 36q 2 oo I— YES [] NO ,&P_A REVIEW HEIGHT -j PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPILE 5,&REA PR ALLOWED PROPOSE� W �j EXP NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWZQ,.,�O POSED RE OR D SETBACKS (FT.) F 11N,��E REAR PROPWED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT'%�DE REAR ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR x z CHANGE OF USE APARTMENT REMODEL E] SIGN z PA KING I"%QT REGR<OVIDED AREA PL�NNING REVIEWED BY DATE F� REPAIR 0 GRADING FENCE CYDS ( , I X FT) R DEMOLISH TANK OT—HER oGARAGE RETAINING WALL CARPORT 0 ROCKERY D RENEWAL P: (TYPE OF USE, BUSINEIS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKE6 BY TYP NVRU OCCUPANT 2: M 0 GR NUMBER NbM E OF CRITICAL Cn W SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAREA OCCUPANT 0 go OF DWELLIR AREAS 0 STORIES 111#4 UNITS NUMBE R REQUIRED C] YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE.,.,i' REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER LIBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION ON 6-1 1,k I 6ek-1, 2 Fi� L� d i k _Z 0 VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING —77' PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. t: 2 STAI'r'SURCHARGE A Its. cr W PERMIT APPLICATION: ISO DAYS QL PERMIT LIMIT:'I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE Uj IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF _j LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE cc ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIF DE EMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE RECEIPT 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT: HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION . APPLICATION GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIGNA,JRE (OWNER OR(&2gP,00/ DATE SIGNED (425) 0 FFICIAUS S DATE �EIGJTJIE r 771-0220 RELEASE9 BY DIE - ATTENTION EXT 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO US E OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL Vim 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI_ ORIGINAL-191LE X CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX - YELLOW - INSPEJOR PINK -OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/96