22310 HIGHWAY 99.PDF1111111111 lill
11597
22310 HIGHWAY 99
ADDRESS:
TAX ACCOUNTIPARCEL NUMBER: C-
!;� 647 :5 ZZ Vg2 ZZ
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver 0 Study Required
/gWaiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: —
PERMITS
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: zo/�.
SEWER LID FEE LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: —
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S).#: / �&/
GEOTECH REPORT DATED: NA�
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
LATEMP\DS'Ps\Fomks\Street File Checklist.doc
APF7
\No"_6WMT
MAIN
0 0
1 PLANNING DATA STREET
New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects
Name: V_C*V1!5 'Au" 125YID VeIV2>
Date:
SiteAddress: qq
Plan Check #: BLD-2006- C)
Project Description:
Use(s) Proposed: 10 C1 1-6( 9 4e..
Allowed Use: (&qo)
CUP File Number:
To Allow What Uses:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES NO)
Zoning: C., C,
Map Page:
Comp Plan Desi* nation- "ect/ t.�V qg. 1 a uh.vf t,1
9 - ge Hwy el car-yl *Aor
Corner Lot: (YES / NO)
Flag Lot:, (XES ge
ile- Number (date waived):
Lot Area:
Plans Match ADB Approved: NO)
Shoreline Required: (YES COD
Critical Areas Determination #:
El Study Required CM- OUP0
IN Waiver
SEPA Determination: Lo VV1 MeA-C,4 'el LJ�DD,
X Exempt :t-+ o& I C1 Z,5 IP n-ew i'n a req 1*0c)
al
9r
El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake
Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form).
Re d Setbacks
Street:
tiM 61 Cl
Side:
Side: It
t',
Rear: 0
W
ActualSetbacks
Street-
51
S �ide: 9 (P
� S
S ide
W I . 0 Ttw
Rear'.
Lot Coverage/FAR Required: M ID N J�—,*
Lot Coverage/FAR Provided:
Lot Coverage/FAR Calculations: N A -
Building Height
DatumPoint: j�polAf�j
Datum' Elevation:
Maximum Height: 4-9 +0 - (P.)
Actuall-Ibight:
Subdivision: -�
Lot Aggregation Required:
Landscaping
Landscaping Matches AD13 Approved:
Landscaping Bid Provided: (Y`E644��
Bond Amount (100% Bid):
M
Plan Review By:
PLANNING DATA STR EE T F=ILE
New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects
Commercial Parking
Analysis
B�siness Nlam'e
Type/Use
Parking
Ratio
Tenant)(-'
Area
R�quired
Parking
VD
LOVC, Car Lot
1/15wt#to.�
-j 8�o4t
I o 14
�e I s, V-D c� Lof 6L r4eoi
AJ Ict 2149 POP06CA Wdtl
tv (0 �? 4 e,�( 1,01 6(n
,-V 1�5- 62 t
sm a,.rC,A, (,t421- rtot ftl r_tU6((V19 Total Parking Required:
I kO
_,W�
tl�4. YIA IV? 6 (7 f2a tz,�7 Total Parking Provided:
0 10 a t4,&
Wultffo� Parkiog Anal
# Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit
Parking Ratio
��# �s
Required
Parking
Studio
1.2/D.U.
1 Bedroom
,�. �/DU.
2 Bedrooms
1.8/D.U.
3 + Bedroo9s__�
2.0/D.,U.
Total Parking Required:
Total Parking Pro vided:
Vther,
— VLO OwtCKA,05 kv f a 46*� ey a vi ?,VV1 4�41 0 W el
— ftt-a f vu'vi I WA 11,5 P,, N W Corrits, Of Sl+-
NAAJ AVJ"rJ-5*
YrVPt7
tief Vt catc'�` 1004(P
Plan Review BY: 0;V-0 &,4166� 101.00 (o 1, 2, r2 AVICAV151
50 4S LA 1; - (0
PLANNING DATA STREET=FILE
New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects
Name: VeyD (_6 ALAtD DVD keA,%,,
Date: 1,C)O(p
Site Address: 1,v R-iehway 19
Plan Check#: BLD-2006- JID02.
Project Description: RAACAVs&�A 0 o, vA 4g e, ko� I a
Use(s) Proposed:
Allowed Use: NO)
(DS
CUP File Number:
To Allow What Uses:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES /9
Reduced Site Plan Provided: es NO)
Zoning: D C,
Map Page: 10
w_4Atwyq6J a&��vf c4y-
Comp Plan Designation-
HW4 ACI yri�j 0y,* Se
Corner Lot: (YES / NO)
Flag Lot: (YES
ile Number (date waived): 0 (p ci
Lot Area:
O-Plans Match ADB Approved: (YES / NO)
Shoreline Required: (YES
Critical Areas Determination M
El Study Required
N Waiver
SEPA Determination: 4aYeWV%R1r-. 4 15 0 0 ay ok _,rp 0 Y-ok 0(-4* fie
E Exempt 2,13 1 X If -f I I = 19114W view k0145 avf,6L.
El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake
Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form).
Re .S��tbacks'
Street: 1
HWY 99
Side:
I .
Rear:
\A/
Actual Sethacks�
Street:
Side:
ide:
Rear:
Lot Coverage/FAR Required:
Lot Coverage/FAR Provided: NIA -
Lot Coverage/FAR Calculations:
Datum Point:
Datum Elevation:
Maximum Height:
Actual Height:
Subdivision:
Lot Aggregation Required:
La)7dscqpZV
pLandscaping Matches ADB Approved:
Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO)
Bond Amount (100% Bid):
Plan Review By: ' YV~
0 PLANNING DATA 0
New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects
STREETFILE
Commercial Parking Analysis
Business Name .
Type/Use
Parking
Ratio
Tenantv-
Area "'
Required
Parking
Y-C#V' kIA-fD 16M 04*27
Ucp(A Cd r 10+
1/85W*( ot
0 C)41#
rc
A -A bid
lot
1P
LJ TotalParkin Required.-
0 go Q:i- 1p [at 9
I(P
1A bt- (VI CA V dA'V1 CA pa-Molo, c7pa ces) Total Pirking Provided.-
Multi-Fami6V Parking Anal is
# Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit
Parking Ratio
# U��
---R-equired
Parking
Studio
1.2/D.U..
I Bedroom
1.5
2 Bedrooms
3 t Bedroo9s_�
2.0!D:,U.
Total Parking Required. -
Total Parking Pro vided.-
Other
lrtJ-a(vJfvJ5 WA 11C.P 0 NW Wyn,&y Of cpjf-C.'
V10
ev Z, 51P Vitw 101 C,
L,O
W-A % 100 - te(O 0 4 �;J —' +
------- t()J. DD
Plan Review By: gt�w aa� 0. (,p
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects
" 113 04 - 0&'� 99
7-1 SITE ADDRESS: 29 3/c, LIV.'m �,, , z z32*-1=2�PZONING: C6 2- (0A 3
0
0
0
z
0
Z
U
U
USE(S) PROPOSED: 3,- k,-i / , L2C2� / ALLOWED?: Yiet
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/Q
CUP File: —To Allow What.Uses?:
ADB FILE #:
PARKING:
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Total Required: Actual Provided:
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: i5' Left Side: 0 Right Side: 0 Rear: o
Actual Setbacks:
Front: �V Left Side: Right Side:- 0 Rear: 0
Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No)
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: N.
Maximum Allowed: Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT: (vf� c 1�f,
Maximum Allowed: 457, -Actual Height:
Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height:
Datum Point: Datum Elevation:
Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? If so,VAR#
LANDSCAPING:
Matches ADB approved:
Bid Provided? Bond Amount (100% bid):
CRITICAL AREAS #: LA-111b -4ff t- 7,237-4 L�=�2 L4 1929.. Z4o �_ IZ3o4
SEPA DETERMINATION: F,&,rv, a~M gN.,.e--A A* 4S,!;
SHORELINE REQUIRED?: IV,,
Continued ...
1Afibrary\AP1andatNewComm.doc
DATE: 5 / 2-4/0 1, PLANCHK#: 0&-0)7
NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: k-t-r-1 i A14. 60 W�efr
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Com-k-wi, , rowto wott -,s- e2ef:n_� 1,�x
7/ 3 /,, t, -
ADB FILE #: OR DATE WAIVED: AA,-�, - &an,�m - 41.,,, /0
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: ?ArV-jt lok 4041 e-j- 'A, 4 kl*�
Imom I.P'13 4^1t A4f f P—")
SUBDIVISION:
LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: Mot- g.4�, goc
REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? Y*,
OTHER: 4-te j6t�: Z1304 t�= I-,w ',� -,4 fj_ 6u.,,v, ojj�,j
aoth lon 4�,At#:m m "A to., 1. for -,'I
Plan Review By:
-T6 +V,4 &itg, 6r�' 6.,.e (Alaij JN f4t.,J. 99 &4L 1-^
Tkutt.,-, 1,%-A AAj'ql—�� 1-�;I/ 6( '4qW'tA ".' "ul 'sww ,
1Afibrary\^P1andatNewComm.doc
CA FILE NO. 9 ND
ClOical Areas Checklist
---------------- ---------------------------------------------
Site Information (soil s/topo graphy/hydrology/v getation)
1. Site Address/Location: C�A
2. Property Tax Account Number: 7'0
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): t 7, cO
4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; no.
If yes; bow is site developed9 5-0c)
b
5. Describe the general site topography. CbecR all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire'site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of
I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: fJ/,Aq- Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: A—) Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway /\) r) floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contai s creek or an area where water floiN�s jcrojs the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested A1' meadow No: shrubs
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) (S�C �-6/ fo("-' mixed /J o
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: /vo
IF=
0'0�chk.doc; Ray 10/03/97
RECEIVED
City of Edmonds
SEP 16 1999
PERMIT COUNTER
CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds prior to 1-�s/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Axeas are. 'or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent infor mation (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant: Applicant Representative:
Name Name
C-4 "� C--� 0, 3
Street Address Street'Address
cz-
City State Zip City State
Zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
c:reccpdon\jana\cac1.doc
(over)
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
q'i P_�= DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
't --lillow1w, Planning - Building - Engineering
-r? '. 1 S () 13
September 20, 1999
Jeffrey M. Hancock
Chuck Olson Chevrolet
17037 Aurora Avenue North
Seattle, WA 98115
Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 99-260
Dear Applicant:
BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City
is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page).
It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records.
PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUD
The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a
project -specific determinatiom
mo, You must submit a CODV of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL
PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. 4141111111
Permit applications include the following:
Eric: Determination
* Architectural Design Board
C:ReceptionUana\CRLTR.doc
Building Permits
Conditional Use Permits
Subdivisions
Variances
Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications
Any other development permit applications.
Thank you.
Planning Secretary
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
�z 51) 4- #14) (./ f F
LOT 3 - 0 6ra
L LOT 3-065
_0
0
S zo, .4.
F-XItTINrm
OFFICE
AWIN IN IVY
P ll- T F' E- 2 cov&j
r'. 7,9.-
E� T I
r I Nr,)
14 A-f
f�e--
To
LT 0
�-4 A
FX-O
_X rl t4 cm
&
W
4,*
/�T
0
/LT.
-ks, LOW SHguL; (iz)"
S/i, ,v (15) AZALEA PLANT,-
rHoHr: ESOOT14--..
5 FT 0. MAX.
LiErU-4EV TOPICoit- 1,
NE16,1450KINf, P.
F-05TINA
LANr5CAPF-p
14'
AFEl\:
h,
100 evdk- FT
Ae
L-,� N P -5
S-ITE F;-AW 1 20 2---!��CA f- 11-4 6, IL -AN.
15W�Pl�L.-FACI!P lLWMlWATr-P
rYL0HLiXEAP6ZS0AV.P il-'N
AC-J(14" R0R-ILLUMlJATEFp lze
AWNINC,---
15' MA)(.
2 �qqg IF—D
DEVELOPMEN7 SERVICES c7-R.
C'Ty OF FDMOND�,
1 11 = -1, C),
5, CA L, I-
�' F�k
L
The City of Edmonds
APPLICATION Mo.
EASEMENT No . ......................................
k / D L?-
0I - - -------- ------ PERMIT No.
OWNER --- TUMAS -------- A ....... F0 --------- S ....................................... CONTRACTOR
STREET
HOUSE No. .-,�13A.14 -------- lq-i .... v,4- . .. ... AVENUE LOT No . ...................................................................... BLOCK No . ...............................................
NAMEADD - ------------------- .......... 34� ............. ....................................................................
n flA
0
El
N%
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ...
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ..........
jour
SME SEVAM PERMIT
OUTSIDE n INSIDE [-] REPAIRS F-1
Date Approved:
........................ DEPOSIT, $ ............................................. I /-I /I
2r
DATE...............................................
0.
irkPPROVED
By------
.. .....................................................
WASHIMiTIM
Ti= INSURANCE REAL:7ESTATE CONTRAff REAL ESTATE SALES YX I
AMOUNT PAID_?,/_.jL.1 0
COMPANY Cp I-W, I
RECEIPT NO j .. �._z
JUN
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered Into, this 9 th day of 'Jun, di.-,-�,1966 1966
VIR IV[ Qholfl
between ALEX KANE, a singlei'man..�,w,
13Y
Deputy
hereinafter called the "seller," and THOMAS A* FOULDS and HELEN FOULDS., hi!R5if e
hereinafter called the "purchaser,"
WITNESSETH: That the seller agrees to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase from the seller the following
described real estate, with the appurtenances, in Snohomisfi* County, State of Washington:
Tha t portion of the east one-half of southwest�:*pne_quarter of the northwest
one -quarter of southwest.one-quarter lying westerly of State Road No. 1, less
the northlerly,300 feet, and Beginning at the southwest corner,of the northwest
one -quarter of the southwest onerquaXter, thence South 0005'39" EaSt-30 f�et,
thence north,0*44' west 240 feet, thente south-89*05'58" east 225 feet to true
point of beginning, thence' South 53*25'09" east 101.42 feet, thence north
0*36'41" west 184.17 feet, thence north 89*05'58" wedt-81.33 feet, thence south
0*44!�east 1.25. -feet-to' true point of beginning, all in Section 29, Township-27,
Range, 4,1 E W e,'Me
SUBJECT TO sewer assessments which purchasers shaltassume.
The terms and conditions of this contract are as follows: Ile purchase price is THIRTY ONE THOUSAND AND 00/00
(s 31.,000.00 Dollars, of which
THREE HUNDRED TEN AND 00/100 (s 310.00 Dollars have
been paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and the balance of said purchase price shall be paid as follows:
THREE HUNDRED TEN AND 00/100 ($ 310.00 Dollars,
or more at purchaser's option, on or before the JS day of' August '19 66,
and THREE HUNDRED TEN' AND 00/100 ($310..00 Dollars,
or more at purchaser's option, on or before of- each'succeeding calendar month until the balance of said
ri '*�'j purchase price shall have been fully paid th
Thvpurchaser furl, er'.agrees to pay. interest on the diminishing balance of said purchase price
at the rate of 6 -.,'-,p . er I cem per annum from' the ' 1 S t dak, of June '19 66,
which interest shall be deducted from each installment payment and the balance'of each payment applied in reduction of principal.
AD payments to be made hereunder shall be made at 50 Altamont Street, Ashland, Oregon,
or at such other place as the seller may direct in writing. Interest.for months of June and July,'1966,
has been paid and seller acknowledges receipt thereof. Purchasers shall not 1
sell or assign the property, or their interest in this contract without sellers
written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Large
advertising sign on the premises -shall not be removed until June 1, 1967,
or $2,000.00 has been paid on principal, whichever shall occur first.
As'referred to in this contract, "date of closing" shall be June -I—r,-"
(1) The purchaser assumes and agrees to pay before delinquency all tax . es and assessments that may as between grantor and grantee'
hereafter become'a lien on said real estate; and if by the terms of t.his contract, the purchaser has assumed payment of any mortgage,
contract or other encumbrancei or has assumed payment of -or agreed to purchase subject'to, any, taxes or assessments now a lien on said
real estate, the purchaser agrees to pay the same before delinquency.
(2) The purchaser agrees, until the purchase price is fully paid, to keep the buildings now:and hereafter placed on said real estate
insured to the actual cash value thereof against loss or damage by both fire and windstorm in a company acceptable to the seller and for,
the seller's benefit, as his interest may appear, and to pay all premiums therefor and to deliver all policies and renewals thereof to
the seller.
(3) The purchaser avrees that full inspection of sa'd real estate has been made and that neither the seller ner his assigns shall be held
_WX
p
lo
aAAk-w— P&Uxt�j d-n
Pr
At
TO:
SUBJECT:
Eddie,
PIP, &
SKY VAL� YAS Y & MAPPING�
8021 228' ST SW
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDDIE SHAWARI
223 10 HWY 99
EDMONDS, WA 98026
RETAINING WALL
CITY OF EDMONDS PERMIT #2006-0644
oz
Sj?%tt'0�
l RECEIVED
OCT 3 1 2006
BUILDING DEPT.
Per your request, I have completed fieldwork to locate existing footing forms with respect to the West
property line for the parcel located at the above address. I proceeded as follows:
Research & Reconnaissance:
I acquired a Record of Survey for the parcel performed by Meyring & Associates in 1996, recorded under
AF #0608095001, Records of Snohomish County Washington. In the field, I found the NW property
missing due to excavation. I found the SW property comer, as well as three other comers on the north
boundary.
Fieldwork:
I performed a field traverse on the parcel in order to find coordinate geometry for the existing property
comers as well as the westernmost footing forms for the proposed retaining wall. The forms were in place.
No concrete had been poured. I took seven shots on what would be the western edge of concrete after forms
would be stripped.
Calculation:
After reducing fieldnotes, I compared the existing geometry with that shown on the above mentioned
Record of Survey. I found a "best fit" between the SW property comer, and the northernmost comer at a
point on the north property line where it jogs. I used this inverse as the Basis for the survey. Not only did
this represent the best fit (within 1.9 inches over 148.30 feet), but it uses comers which are shown and
described on the Record of Survey. I was then able to compare the remaining field data with a theoretical
position for the NW property comer.
Precision:
Accuracy can be expected to be within I inch in the East/West direction, and within 1.5 inches in the
North/South direction.
Conclusion:
If concrete were to be poured in the foundation footing forms as I found them on
10-27-06, the NW comer of the concrete would fall 0.49 feet East of the West property line, and the SW
comer of concrete would fall 1.28 feet East of the West property line. The concrete footing would not
encroach on the neighboring parcel to the West.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service,
.,- �Michael E. Bell, PLS # 18075
cc: Waite Architects
Attn: Steve Waite, AIA
I
Sj C T 3 .1
APPROVED PLANS AND JOB CARD MUST BE AVAILABLE TO.INSPECIPOR ON
BUILDING DEPT.
CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE
-OF WORK IS STARTED
L3 RECALL FO . R INSPECTION Ll $50 REINSPECTION FEE MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO INSPECTION REQUEST
STOP WORK -UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BYCITY INSPECTOR
13 -NO*PERmiri-g*r6P woRK-REmOV15XONSTRUCTION OR OB
TAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH,:
AL L APPLICABLE CITY CODES
Lk
L)
fz�
ot�j Y-N
�je
THE ACTIONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED, ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO BE CORRECTED WITHIN
TO CALENDA . R DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPECTION- CALL 425-771-0220
Building U Planning L3 Enginee I ring L1 Fire L3 Public Works
Inspebtor Date
E
A44 5Wro S.WrIOV 29 TZ7A& R4& W-14
S7AN0QJ;%� 3AAM CC eV&%'rY, W43P41AAMW
70- M
'VA- S9 f-4AT9 jawlro.7
-Iwo of
swvey7,
A.1�43' Q$ O-V'V*'-. sm. 29. rVA4 R4-1 W.M.
9438mi-
8493 --%,% ~Rqt
all,
.. . .........
h
% r-4 I
'5
.. .... PronVii'a and MAC 1
r-AE7-,Aoo-. Fiold7l-ovwsz
CQFLACY -reavQrsaiCl G%jrQ
gf-LOTCORN *h respacr
FkS %5 wi
kin mimon+10n - IS 0,05 FT.
9 Mu
TW.ff 0/4.
GRA P-C. SCvL
% SCALE! Va 30 rt.
A A haast coma, of the sw it
365 fncg the '_'h 63-05-'10 .'t 2 5 to I—
f !'lt; 1h .... :i.lh
JIMs". ;.%zg ."t to a Po
point .1 b iml.st the.. RECEIVED
1 .2 24;L zu -5r.5)V t b in at. 1. he
wan 6; 1. t
SEP 0 12006
'5--- A,' 08 3 111 ch:dS. 1/4
AeW 7 CW AMU tiop
nagt,of the 9V&-fji.f th.&/4.1 the w 114 of
'ftv. fAv luen ft"'fiR7,"'34 o!.%all;
Z;WeAA%-0 V"0110 SIT as,
YIZ. /7,W_�RW47 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
®R ........ % CITY OF EDMONDS
kw7Xr_Z.V 6
---.PLAT OF SURVEY FOR
FIECORIDINGIC TISCAT9
FILED FOR FtWEO ,,S. 4�44
DAY OF
_"7k_A.O.AT 411M,
t2
A AT THE
IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE
REOLIEST OF
RECORDS OF COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
A Or I
SURVEYORP �EATnC_A_TF,
THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRE!3ENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR
�DER My DIRECnONImCOWORM�tCEWaNTHEREOUIREMENTS
OF THE EY,;W
SLORY '!��ACT AT THE REOUIST OF
2^1 — IN THE MONTH
OF
CERIMICAll M.ER —Aws
VMFV-1
wive"
YRiNq I&` ......
1206)778-3101
AssociATES, KC.
23423Highway99
EdmondsWA 98020
P.O. Box 32
Lynnwood WA 98036
Z4014 FOULDS
wi;PI6 RING 3-c -2
2 v &A
BEING -A �&,itopq'bF TH "I
)F,rHE,116;/_ QUAFITEAWSI
TOWN9�j I P -Z2—+;ORTH, fbkN,
4TE IFB.---'- PG
I
-ri? c. 18,9 13
.0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH * EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning * Building - Engineering
August 21, 2006
MEMO TO:
Puget Sound Energy
Verizon Northwest
SNOCOM Police and Fire Dispatch
SNOPAC
Snohomish County E911
U.S. Post Office
Snohomish County Assessor's Office
Snohomish County Information Services
Snohomish County P.U.D.
Edmonds Fire Department
Edmonds Police Department
Edmonds Utility Billing
Edmonds Public Works
Edmonds Building/Street File
Edmonds Address Files
Lynnwood Disposal
Comcast Cable
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
Please be advised that 22310 Highway 99 has been added to the Edmonds address
system:
Occupancy: Commercial Tax ID Number: 27042900306600
Subdivision: See attached parcel legal description.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or
Harrison@ci.edmonds.wa.us. Please contact me if you wish to be removed from tl-ds list.
Respectfully,
M.1il. mllil.
Senior Permit Coordinator
Edmonds Building Department
Cc: Applicant
County, WA Assessor Parcel Data Pagel of2
0 0
SnohomishOnline Government Information & Services
County4*
Washington
* R E A L * Property Information
County Home Assessor Home Treasurer Home Information on which Departmen to contact
Please view Disclaimer If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please Contact Us.
Date/Time:8/21/20062:03:04PM Answers to ELequently Asked. Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new window)
Return to Property Information Ent[y pgge
Parcel Number 27042900306600 Prev Parcel Reference 29270430660007
1 _4ap of this parcel (opens as new window])
General Information
Taxpayer Name 11 Address (contact the Treasurer if you have questions)
YERIEL LLC 11 PO BOX 84325 --- SEATTLE, WA 98124
If the above mailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change, see the information on Name and
Address Chan-qes
Owner Name 11 Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions)
YERIEL LLC 11 PO BOX 84325 --- SEATTLE9 WA 98124
If the above name and address is incorrect due to a recent sale, please see the infort-nation on Name and
Address Changes After a Sale
Street (Situs) Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions)
UNKNOWN UNKNOWN - - -
Parcel Legal Description
SEC 29 TWP 27 RGE 04 RT-24) BEG SW COR NW 1/4 SWI A TH S89* 05 39E 30FT TH NOO*44 OOW
240FT TH S89* 05 58E 225FT TO TPB TH S53*25 09E 101.42FT TH NOO*36 41W 184.17FT TH N
89*05 58W 81.33FT TH SOO*44 OOE 125FT TO TPB
Go to top of page
Treasurer's Tax Information
Taxes For answers to questions about Taxes, please contact the Treasurer's office (opens as
new window)
2006 Taxes for this parcel $2,793.69
(Taxes may include Surface Water Management and/or S�tate Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges, if any, are not
included.)
To obtain a duplicate tax statement, either download our Tax Statement Request form or call 425-388-3366 to
request it by phone.
Go to top of page
Assessor's Property Data Characteristics and Value Data below are for 2006 tax year.
Please contact the Treasurees office for answers to questions about Taxes (opens as new window)
For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes),
please contact the Assessoes Office (opens as new window)
Property Values do not reflect adjustments made due to an exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons
http://web5.co.snohomish.wa.uslpropsyslAsr-Tr-PropinqlPrpinqO2-ParcelData.asp?PN=27... 8/21/2006
Snohomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data Page 2 of 2
Values exemption.
Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill.
Tax Year 2006 Market Land $277,900 Market Improvement Sol
Market Total $277,9001
Pendine Property Values
Tax Year 20()7 Market Land $277,900 Market Improvement $01
Market Total $277,9001
Go to top of pagg
Property Characteristics
Tax Code Area (TCA) 00232 View Taxing Districts for this Parcel (opens as new window)
Use Code 551 Motor Vehicles
Size Basis ACRF, Size 0.29 (Size may include undivided interest in common tracts and road parcels)
Go to top of page
Property Structures
No structures found for this parcel
Go to top_qf_page
Property Sales since 7/31/1999
Explanation of Sales Information (opens as new window)
Sales data is based solely upon excise affidavits processed by the Assessor.
Transfer Receipt Sales Price Excise Deed Grantor (Seller)
Grantee (Buyer) Other
Parcels
Date Date Number Type
4/28/2005 5/17/2005 $1,653,000 480570 W FOULDS THOMAS C SR GUARDIAN OF
YERIEL LLC Yes
Go to top of page
Property Maps Township/Railge/Section/Quarter, links to maps
Neighborhood 5604000 Explanation of Ng�ighborhood Code (opens as new window)
Township 27 Range 04 Section 29 Quarter SW Find parcel maps for this Township/Range/Section
View Map of this parcel (opens as new window)11
http://web5.co.snohomish.wa.uslpropsyslAsr-Tr-PropinqlPrpinqO2-ParcelData.asp?PN=27... 8/21/2006
i
761
18014 G
DA
2.2" Ell �7607
919
-n
w 22430 FS is
752
[15.3 �2
m 7518
7519 U)
:E ct)
rH AVE W 3 E
7512 7505
2817 1 ..., i I
742 (n
1121 1112
rs
5 U 1. �V . I T
! :74T.H. PL-W
7412 is m
7409 3 99� 0
7409
N --I
7403 M CL 0 en
7403
7329 7330 7313 PS H72,1 7M >
7311 '32
7320 7309
.73RD PL W
3
CL
1308 72 205 7206
7204
r
eg
205
7202
G Q-PL
fS 0 J—,
P3 PS 22425 7212 1
;"05 § 7207
7110
0,7 72 6
7109
71DS
'... -- I
.08 7107 NW TRACTION R/W
7104 -----------------------
7105
Brookside
7101
cn
7116
7010
0
3
0 C)
(D 7008
7007 0 0) 7076
7006 7005 rs -7004 0
r, c 3 7030 7034
7004 7003
0 U) 0
(D 7020
0 7001
m AVE W
2 0
2270 69
908 0 (D 6920
21 69 7 -Ulf
1 6906 69 5 0
6'04
6901 0
8902 0
=;
r__, 6810 CD 6908
-0
808
(D
z 6808 68TH, gos 6902
0
6804
0,ZZ
zo9ze
f
703 707 8708
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
" I RRR� DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
I Planning - Building - Engineering
111-C
February 10, 2000
Tom Foulds
P.O. Box 1476
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Dear Mr. Foulds:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
The purpose of this letter is to update you on the most recent status concerning the complaint
filed against your property at 22304 — Highway 99 in Edmonds. The complaint was concerning
two unpermitted detached structures located on the site. Your complaint had been assigned to
enforcement case file numbered. B E-99-177.
Late last year, you visited me at Edmonds City Hall. The visit was in regards to a letter you
received notifying you that unpermitted structures appeared on your commercial property in
Edmonds. In response to the letter, you submitted evidence and pleaded your case for the
structures to remain as legally nonconforming or "grandfathered". During our conversation, you
stated, "The structures in question had preceded my purchase date of 1966 and even the
annexation into Edmonds in 1959". Also, you provided the City with pictures and a dated real
estate contract for reference to establish timelines in this matter.
We have decided that because of the facts you have given to the City of Edmonds, your
structures will be allowed to remain without being required to obtain valid building permits or
approval by the City's Architectural Design Board. The information you provided indicates that
the structures were originally constructed legally and should be allowed to remain.
In the future, if you plan to alter these structures please be aware that a building permit will be
required before the work can legally take place. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Enforcement case file numbered BE-99-177 is now considered closed and no further
investigation shall take place.
If you have any questions, comments or concerns please contact me at (425) 771-0220.
; Si e
J n Tourtellot
o s cl
nstruction Compliance Inspector
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Citu - Hpkinan. Janan
Owl
INN`
to,
dT
rV
;IF
--------- — -
.21
Al
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
February 10, 2000
Tom Foulds
P.O. Box 1476
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Dear Mr. Foulds:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
FILE
The purpose of this letter is to update you on the most recent status concerning the complaint
filed against your property at 22304 — Highway 99 in Edmonds. The complaint was concerning
two unpermitted detached structures located on the site. Your complaint had been assigned to
enforcement case file numbered BE-99-177.
Late last year, you visited me at Edmonds City Hall. The visit was in regards to a letter you
received notifying you that unpermitted structures appeared on your commercial property in
Edmonds. In response to the letter, you submitted evidence and pleaded your case for the
structures to remain as legally nonconforming or "grandfathered". During our conversation, you
stated, "The structures in question had preceded my purchase date of 1966 and even the
annexation into Edmonds in 1959". Also, you provided the City with pictures and a dated real
estate contract for reference to establish timelines in this matter. -
We have decided that because of the facts you have given to the City of Edmonds, your
structures will be allowed to remain without being required to obtain valid building permits or
approval by the City's Architectural Design Board. The information you provided indicates that
the structures were originally constructed legally and should be allowed to remain.
In the future, if you plan to alter these structures please be aware that a building permit will be
required before the work can legally take place. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Enforcement case file numbered BE-99-177 is now considered closed and no further
investigation shall take place.
If you have any questions, comments or concerns please contact me at (425) 771-0220.
; Si e ,
J n Tourtellot
o s cl
nstruction Compliance Inspector
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister CitV - Hekinan, Japan
CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (4 25) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
C. 18 9 11
February 10, 2000
Tom Foulds
P.O. Box 1476
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Dear Mr. Foulds:
RECEIVED
FEB 10 2000
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR-
CITY OF EDMONDS
The purpose of this letter is to update you on -the most recent status concerning the complaint
filed against your property at 22304 — Highway 99 in Edmonds-.- The complaint was concerning
two unpermitted detached structures located on the'site. Your complaint had been assigned to
enforcement case file numbered BE-99-177.
Late last year, you visited me at Edmonds City Hall. The visit was in regards to a letter you
received notifying you that unpermitted structures appeared on your commercial property in
Edmonds. In response to the letter, you submitted evidence and pleaded your case for the
structures to remain as legally nonconforming or "grandfathered". During our conversation, you
stated, "The structures in question had preceded my purchase date of 1966 and even the
annexation into Edmonds in 1959". Also, you provided the City with pictures and a dated real
estate contract for reference to establish timelines in this matter.
We have decided that because of the facts you have giveh to the City of Edmonds, your
structures will be allowed to remain without being required to obtain valid building permits or
approval by the City's Architectural Design Board. The information you provided indicates that
the structures were originally constructed legally and should be allowed to remain.
In the future, if you plan to alter these structures please be aware that a building permit will be
required before the work can legally take place. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Enforcement case file numbered BE-99-177 is now considered closed and no further
investigation shall take place.
If you have any questions, comments or concerns please contact me at (425) 771-0220.
; Si e
J n TTourtellot
o struct
nstruction Compliance Inspector
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Jar)an
0000<-
r:
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 3, 1999
Jeffrey M * Hancock, C.P.A.
Controller
Chuck Olson Chevrolet
P.O. Box 7115, Stn.19
Seattle, WA 98133
Dear Mr. Hancock:
BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOk
The purpose of this letter is to clarify the terms of a recent business license approval for Chuck
Olson's Cartown at 22304 Highway 99 in Edmonds. The proposed used car lot was to be located
on a property that was shown as paved on a prior application. As a result, improvements shown
on the prior plan were to be required before the City of Edmonds was able to approve of a
business at the site.
When the City of Edmonds reviews an application submitted for conducting business, a number
of considerations are addressed. In this case, the property in question was required to be paved
with parking stalls clearly identified for the off-street parking of both customers and employees.
In response you submitted a permit application for paving the site. The application was
approved and the paving was completed with the agreement that no stormwater detention
improvements would be required for the project.
I hope this letter helps to clarify the agreement made for the business license approval of Chuck
Olson's Cartown in Edmonds. If you have any questions, comments or concerns then please
contact me at (425) 771-0220.
g Si e y,
J Ja Tourtel�lot
a
TOU
ode Compliance Inspector
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
HWAGEOSCIENCES INC.
Geotechnical Engineering - Hydrogeology - Geoenviron?nental Services Inspection & 1esting
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
Waite Architects
111 Durbin Drive
Edmonds, WA 98020
Attn: Stephen Waite, AIA
RE: GEOTECIINIcAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED VEMCLE STORAGE BUILDING
Kero's Auto Brokers
22324 Highway 99, Edmonds, Washington
Dear Mr. Waite:
As authorized, HWA GeoSciences Inc. (HWA) has conducted a geotechnical assessment
for a proposed vehicle storage building at the northwest comer of the subject property.
HWA previously prepared a geotechnical report for the retaining walls at the northwest
comer of the site (HWA, 2006). The results of our site visit and inspection of the
exposed soils at the face of the excavation and subgrade soils in front of the wall were
used to provide the recommendations herein.
The objective of our assessment was to provide geotechnical recommendations for
design, permitting and construction of the proposed vehicle storage building. This letter
report summarizes the results of our assessments and provides our recommendations.
PROPOSED VEHICLE STORAGE BUILDING
Based on plans provided by Stephen Waite Architects, the proposed building will be
approximately 25 feet wide (north -south) and 77feet long (east -west), as shown on the
attached Site Plan, Figure 1 (provided by Waite Architects). We understand that the
building will be about 15 to 16 feet tall. We farther understand that plans are to construct
the north wall of the building on top of the proposed retaining wall along the north
property line of the site, as shown in Figure 2 (provided by Waite Architects). Based on
current plans, this will consist of 2-inch x 6-inch timber stud framing on top of the
retaining wall. We also understand that a portion of the floor slab will be constructed
above the footing of the retaining wall along the north property line, utilizing the wall
footing for the structure foundation.
STR)EET
RECEIVED
SEP 0 1,2006
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
19730 - 64th Avenue W.
Suite 200
Lynnwood, WA 98036.5957
Tel: 425.774.0106
Fax: 425.774.2714
www.hwageosciences.com
A
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
OBSERVATIONS
Observations of site conditions are based on the site visit made during preparation of the
letter report by HWA for the retaining wall (HWA, 2006).
At the time of the site visit, a cut had been made into the slopes along the northern and
western property lines, exposing the soil materials to be retained. Portions of the cut face
were supported with temporary shoring,. consisting of plywood sheets covering the
exposed cut face and in turn supported by 2x4 wood stud raker braces.
The area where the proposed vehicle storage building is to be constructed is currently
surfaced with asphalt pavement, with the exception of the area that has been excavated
for the retaining wall foundation. The ground surface in the vicinity of the proposed
improvements is fairly level.
SOM CONDITIONS
The published geological map (Smith, 1975) shows the general area is underlain by
Vashon till. Till is predominately a mixture of clay, silt, sand, gravel and cobbles that has
been compacted under the weight of a glacier to form a concrete -like material, which is
colloquially referred to as hard pan. Till is typically very dense, forms stable slopes, and
is relatively impervious. However, water frequently percolates through the weathered,
loose, sandy upper layers of the till profile.
Soil conditions visible at the exposed face of the cut were logged in 3 places along the
wall, during the site visit made during preparation of the retaining wall letter report:
NW Properly Corner (Between plyffood shoring sheets)
Depth Soil Description
0 to 4 feet Medium dense, brown, silty sand to sandy silt with
abundant roots and scattered gravel and cobbles, dry,
(Topsoil/Weathered Outwash).
4 to 7 feet Dense, gray brown, gravelly sand to sandy gravel, dry,
(Outwash).
7 to 9 feet Dense, gray brown, gravelly, silty sand, moist, (Till).
9 feet Bottom of excavation.
South End of Wafl
Depth Soil Description
0 to 3 feet Medium dense, brown, silty sand with scattered gravel and
cobbles, dry. Abundant roots/rootlets, (Topsoil/Weathered
Outwash).
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kero's Auto Brokers 2 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
3 to 5 feet Medium dense becoming dense, gray, sandy gravel to
gravelly sand, moist, (Outwash).
5 to 8 feet Dense, olive gray, gravelly, silty sand, M oist, (Till).
8 feet Bottom of excavation.
East End of WaH
Depth
0 to 2.5 feet
2.5 to 3.5 feet
3.5 to 6 feet
6 feet
Soil Description
Medium dense to dense, light brown, gravelly, silty sand
with cobbles/boulders, dry. Roots, plastic wire and plastic
garbage debris noted, (Fill).
Loose to medium dense, brown, silty fine sand with
scattered gravel and cobbles, moist. Roots and rootlets
present, (Weathered Outwash).
Medium dense to dense, brown, gravelly sand with
scattered cobbles, moist, (Outwash).
Bottom of excavation.
Based onthese observations, it appears likely that excavations for foundations of the
proposed vehicle storage building will encounter dense to very dense glacial till or
medium dense to d ense outwash soils, both suitable for foundation support.
Because no subsurface explorations were performed for this evaluation, we recommend
that an HWA geotechnical engineer, or their representative, be onsite during footing
excavation to ensure adequate foundation soils are exposed.
REcOMMENDATIONS
The following sections provide geotechnical design and construction recommendations
for the proposed vehicle storage building.
Temporary Excavations
We do not anticipate excavations deeper than 4 feet for this project; however, any
temporary excavations deeper than 4 feet should be sloped or shored in accordance with
current State of Washington Labor and Industries Safety and Health guidelines, WAC
(Washington Administrative Code) 296-155. Per these guidelines, the onsite outwash
soils classify as Type B soils. Unsupported excavations in Type B soils should be sloped
no steeper than I H: IV. These recommended maximum slopes are applicable to
temporary excavations above the water table only; flatter side slopes would be required
for excavations where ground water seepage is encountered.
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kern's Auto Brokers 3 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
Subgrade Preparation
All loose soil, fill, topsoil, and soil containing significant organics and roots should be
removed from beneath building areas, areas to be paved, and areas to receive structural
fill. Following removal of these soils, the exposed surface should be thoroughly
compacted and evaluated by a geotechnical engineer prior to placement of any structural
fill or construction of facilities. All loose soils should be over -excavated to reach
competent material free from significant roots and organics. Backfill should consist of
structural fill as described in the following report section. We recommend that the
exposed subgrade be proof -rolled with a fully -loaded dump truck, water truck, or similar
heavy equipment, under the observation of the geotechnical. engineer or qualified
earthworks inspector. Areas that exhibit pumping or yielding should be over -excavated
to dense native soils and backfilled as described below.
Structural Fill
For the purposes of this report, material used to raise grades, or placed adjacent to or
under structures for support purposes, should be considered structural fill. Imported
structural fill should preferably consist of relatively free -draining, well -graded, granular
soil that is free from organic matter or other deleterious materials. Such materials should
have a maximum particle size of 4-inches, with less than 7% fines (portion passing the
U. S. Standard No. 200 sieve), meeting the requirements of Gravel Borrow as described
in Section 9-03.14(l) of the WSDOT Standard Specifications (WSDOT, 2006). The
fine-grained portion of structural fill soils should be non -plastic.
As indicated in Sections 4.2 and 4.5, structural backfill used in footing excavations
should consist of crushed surfacing base course (CSBC), as described in Section
9-03.9(3) of the WSDOT Standard Specifications (WSDOT, 2006).
Portions of the native on -site soil are extremely moisture sensitive; hence, we do not
recommend re -use of the on -site soils as structural fill. Moreover, we recommend
earthwork portions of the construction occur during the summer months.
A sufficient number of Modified Proctor moisture -density tests should be performed on
the materials to be used as structural fill to properly evaluate the compaction
characteristics of the material. A geotechnical engineer or qualified field technician
should perform full-time construction monitoring of all fill placement and compaction
operations. If the on -site soils are placed either too wet or too dry of optimum moisture,
content, or if the soils are inadequately compacted, significant settlement should be
anticipated. Soils wi - th less than 5% fines are required if drainage considerations are
important.
Structural fill soils should be moisture conditioned, placed in loose horizontal lifts no
greater than 8-inches thick, and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kern's Auto Brokers 4 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
(MDD) as determined using test method ASTM D 15 57 (Modified Proctor).
Achievement of proper density of a compacted fill depends on the size and type of
compaction equipment, the number of passes, thickness of the layer being compacted,
and soil moisture -density properties. In areas where limited space restricts the use of
heavy equipment, smaller equipment can be used, but the soil must be placed in thin
enough layers to achieve the required relative compaction. Generally, loosely compacted
soils result from poor construction technique and/or improper moisture content. Soils
with high fines contents are particularly susceptible to becoming too wet, and coarse -
grained materials easily become too dry, for proper compaction.
Foundations
Based on our evaluation, it is ' our opinion that the proposed structures can be supported
on conventional spread footing or thickened -edge slab foundations bearing on either the
dense to very dense glacial till, on medium dense to dense outwash soils, or on properly
compacted structural fill placed on the till/outwash soils.
Footings bearing on till, outwash, or properly compacted structural fill placed over
competent native soils should be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of
3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). Design bearing pressures may be increased by 1/3 for
transient conditions, which include wind or seismic loading. We recommend that a
geotechnical engineer evaluate the exposed subgrade soil conditions during the footing
excavations. If, during excavation of the footings, unsuitable soil is encountered, it
should be over -excavated to dense native soil, as directed by the geotechnical engineer.
Continuous strip footings and isolated pad column footings should have a minimum
width of 12 and 24 inches, respectively. Minimum footing widths may govern footing
design.. Exterior footings should bear at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent
finished exterior grade, for frost protection considerations, and interior footings should be
founded at least 12 inches below the existing ground surface or finished floor level.
Structural fill used to backfill footing excavations should consist of crushed surfacing
base course (CSBC) meeting the requirementg-'of Section 9-03.9(3) of the WSDOT
Standard Specifications (WSDOT, 2006). The backfill should be placed in lifts no
greater than 8 inches (uncompacted thickness) and compacted to at least 95% of the
maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor test (ASTM D 1557). The
footprint of any structural fill materials should extend out from the footing edges a
distance equal to the depth of the structural fill (i.e. if 5 feet of poor soils are
sub -excavated, the base of the structural fill should extend out from the footing edges a
distance of 5 feet on each side), measured at the base of the excavation.
Lateral forces may be resisted by a combination of sliding resistance of the footing on the
underlying soil and passive earth pressure against the buried portions of the wall and
footing. For design purposes, a coefficient of friction of 0.5 should be used between the
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kero's Auto Brokers 5 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
base of the footing and native soil. A passive earth pressure equivalent to a fluid
weighing 200 pef may be assumed for properly compacted fill placed against the buried
portion of the wall foundation. This value assumes the ground surface adjacent to the
footing and walls is level and that the area in front of the wall will not be disturbed in the
future.
Because the north wall is proposed to be constructed on top of the new retaining wall
along the north property line, the wall design should be re-evaluated to include the new
loading conditions resulting from the weight of the building, floor slab loading above the
wall foundation, lateral wind loading, seismic loading and other applicable loads.
Footing Construction
After rough excavation, any loose soil in the excavation base should be carefully
removed to expose undisturbed native materials of suitable density, as determined by a
geotechnical engineer or qualified earthworks inspector. A smooth -edge bucket should
be employed on excavator equipment to minimize foundation base disturbance. Minor
amounts of loose material in the base may be compacted with a plate compactor,
hoe -pack or jumping jack to a relatively dense condition. If disturbance is excessive,
however, sub -excavation should be performed to remove such zones and the footings
thickened accordingly to replace the excavated soils. A representative of HWA should
observe all footing excavations, and verify that the appropriate bearing stratum is
exposed and is suitably prepared. Although wet weather construction is not
recommended at this site for foundation elements, a thin skin coat of lean concrete should
be placed after inspection and approval to protect exposed foundation bases if wet
weather conditions are anticipated.
We recommend that excavations for footings not remain open for significant periods of
time prior to placing concrete. If the bottom of the footing excavations become wet,
over -excavation of the loosened wet soils will be required.
Settlement
We estimate that settlement of foundations supported on glacial till, outwash, or on
properly compacted structural fill placed over till/outwash soils will be about I inch or
less, and will occur largely as elastic compression, essentially as the building is
constructed. Where structural fill is utilized for footing support, this estimate assumes
the fill is placed as described in the preceding section. Significantly larger settlements
could result if structural fill is inadequately compacted or consists of materials different
than recommended.
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kero's Auto Brokers 6 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
Floors
Floors for the proposed structure may be constructed as slabs -on -grade bearing on a
prepared subgrade comprised of medium dense to dense native soil, or on structural fill
compacted to 95 percent of its Modified Proctor (ASTM D 1557) maximum density.
For slab -on -grade design, we recommend a modulus of subgrade reaction value of
250 pounds per cubic inch (pci) be used.
If the presence of moisture developing on the surface of the slab is undesirable, we
recommend that the floor slabs be underlain by a 6-inch minimum thickness of 3/8-inch
washed pea gravel, drain rock, or other open -graded gravel material to serve as a
capillary break. The capillary break layer should be placed on properly prepared native
subgrade soils or additional structural fill. A vapor barrier consisting of I 0-mil minimum
thickness plastic sheeting should be placed over the capillary break layer. Where the new
floor is to be constructed above the wall foundation, a vapor barrier consisting of a 1 0-mil
thick plastic sheeting should be placed between the slab and footing.
Drainage
Subsurface drains, consisting of 4-inch minimum diameter perforated pipe, should be
installed around the perimeter of all footings and should be founded at or below the level
of the bottom of the footing. The trenches should be backfilled with washed drain rock
such that a minimum of 6-inches of drain rock encompasses the drain pipe around its
perimeter. R` oof drain downspouts should not be hydraulically connected to the footing
drains to prevent potential clogging and flooding of the drain system. Additionally, the
drainage system for the new retaining walls should not be connected to the footing -drains
for the building. Drainage should conform to City of Edmonds requirements. If the City
of Edmonds requires a storm water detention system, all drains should be tightlined to
this system. If no detention system is required, drainage could be daylighted and directed
to an appropriate outlet. Clean -outs should be provided in the drainage system.
Seismic Considerations
We understand the new buildings will be designed to meet the requirements of the
International Building Code (IBC) 2003 (ICC, 2003).
The seismic ground motion procedure contained in IBC 2003 is based upon a Maximum
Considered Earthquake (MCE) with a 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years
(i.e. recurrence interval of approximately 2500 years). Ground motions for the MCE in
the IBC 2003 are linked to probabilistic earthquake hazard mapping efforts that have
been conducted by the United States Geological Survey (Frankel, et al., 2002). Table I
presents seismic coefficients for use with the General Procedure described in
Section 1615.1 of IBC 2003.
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kern's Auto Brokers 7 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
Table 1: Seismic Coefficients for IBC 2003 Code Based Evaluation
Design
Spectral
Spectral
Site
Spectral
Site
MCE
Acceleration
Acceleration
Coefficients
Response
Control Periods
Class.
PGA
at 0.2sec. (g)
at 1.0sec. (g)
Parameters
(g)
S"
S,
F.
F�
SDS
SDI
TO
T,
D
0.55
1.19
0.42
1.02
1.59
0.81
0.44
0.11
0.54
Based on the results of our field exploration program, the medium dense to dense native
soils or properly compacted fill underlying the proposed structure are considered to have
negligible liquefaction potential under design earthquake conditions. Additionally, the
geologic depositional setting of the site suggests that liquefaction at depth is also an
improbable condition and design concern.
Site Drainage
We anticipate that surface runoff can be controlled during construction by properly
installing silt fences around the lower perimeters of work areas and covering exposed
soils and slopes with plastic sheeting, straw, etc. Permanent control of surfacewater
should be incorporated in the final grading design. Adequate surface gradients and
drainage systems should be incorporated into the design such that surface runoff is
directed away from structures and pavements and into swales or other controlled drainage
devices.
Wet Weather Earthwork
The native till soils. are silty and highly moisture sensitive, and may be difficult to handle
with construction equipment during periods of wet weather. Accordingly, wet weather
earthwork is not recommended for this site. If necessary, however, general
recommendations relative to earthwork performed in wet weather or in wet conditions are
presented below. These recommendations should be incorporated into the contract
specifications.
e Earthwork should be performed in small areas to minimize exposure to wet
weather. Excavation or the removal of unsuitable soil should be followed
promptly by the placement and compaction of clean structural fill. The size and
type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to prevent soil
disturbance. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to excavate soils
with a smooth bucket backhoe to minimize subgrade disturbance caused by
equipment traffic.
0 Material used as structural fill in wet weather should consist of clean granular soil
with less than 5 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve, based on wet sieving the
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kero's Auto Brokers 8 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
fraction passing the %-inch sieve. The fine-grained portion of the structural fill
soils should be non -plastic.
The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-
off of surface water and to prevent the ponding of water.
Excavation and placement of structural fill material should be monitored by a
geotechnical engineer experienced in wet weather earthwork -to determine that the
work is being accomplished in accordance with the project specifications and the
recommendations contained herein.
CONDITIONS AND LUMTATIONS
We have prepared this letter report for use by Mr. Sharawy and his designated agents for
use in the design, permitting and construction of a vehicle storage building at this site.
The conclusions and interpretations included in this report should not be construed as our
warranty of the subsurface conditions. Experience has shown that soil and ground water
conditions can vary significantly over small distances. Inconsistent conditions can occur
between explorations and may not be detected by a geotechnical assessment such as this.
If, during future site operations, subsurface conditions are encountered which vary
appreciably from those described herein, HWA should be notified for review of the
recommendations of this letter report, and revision of such if necessary.
The scope of work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding
the, presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous substances in the soil, surface water, or
ground water at this site. This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety
engineering. We do not direct the contractor's operations and we cannot be responsible
for the safety of personnel other than our own on the site; the safety of others is the
responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the owner if any' of the
recommended actions presented herein are considered unsafe.
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kero's Auto Brokers 9 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
August 30, 2006
HWA Project No. 2006-054-21 Task 200
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service. Should you have any questions
regarding this slope assessment, or require additional services, please contact us.
Sincerely,
HWA,GEOSCIENCES INC.
1 10,6
IEXPIRES OW18/06 "l
Bryan K. Hawkins, P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer
Enclosures: Figure 1. Site Plan
Figure 2. Building Cross -Section
REFERENCES
Lome Balanko, P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer/President
Frankel, Arthur D., M. D. Petersen, C. S. Mueller, K. M. Haller, R. L. Wheeler, E.V.
Leyendecker, R. L. Wesson, S. C. Harmsen, C. H. Cramer, D. M. Perkins, and K. S.
Rukstales, 2002, Documentation for the 2002 National Seismic Hazard Maps Update,
U.S. Geological Survey, Open -File Report 02-420.
HWA, 2006, Geotechnical Assessmentfor Retaining Wall, Kero's Auto Brokers,
22324 Highway 99,. Edmonds, Washington, Consultant Report Prepared by HWA
GeoSciences Inc., Dated April 28, 2006.
International Code Council (ICC), 2003 International Building Code.
Smith, 1975, Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds
West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties, Washington, United States
Geological Survey, Geologic Map GM-14.
WSDOT, 2006, Standard Specificationsfor Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction,
Washington State Department of Transportation.
Proposed Vehicle Storage Building - Kero's Auto Brokers 10 HWA GEoSCIENCES INC.
F5
hd
PI
11
gI
Fj_ I
roof SIODe 1/2"/ft.
N-S Section (looking west)
5cale: 1/4" = V-O"
2x6 studs 16'! o.c.
2x6 fireblocking at 10'-0"
grade
existing retaining wall
Kero's Auto
Brokers
22304 Hwy 99
Edmonds, WA
98026
8/26/06
P P
P
P
22324 Hwy 99
f.nc. encroachment by this parcet,
see AF,9608095001
N 0044'00" W 125.00'
existing landscaping
CL
P filter fabric fence per City of
Edmonds specs (see sheet #7)
P
existing pylon (6) new built-in planters
sign
C�
%% existing ACP throughout for
0
LQ C13 outdoor auto storage - no gain or
loss of stalls.
/C 12(%
22304 Hwy 99
90
existing ACP throug for
outdoor auto storage,
Az
st
Qtz
0
it
99
Work Location on Lot
Scale: 1 20 ft
0
MIZA
existing retaining wall
+-1-08-;00'
NW 101.0
+ 102.0�1
FSD +105'
Uj f
C/) U)
F U_ LL
FSD Off
+ 106.00'
C:
ffizvli.
SW 100.6
.
gN" ygfz.
R"M"-i*
0)
Wk z
. . . . . .
CY)
+ 104.00'
00
LU
Proposed
co
LO
Work
LO
+ 102.00' C)
co
C
.
z
C/)
(assumed
elevations)
S 00*3 6'41 E
C
SE 100.33'
CU
Q)
FSD +130'
_0
FSD (+/-) 1.0'
551
+100.00'
7,
LO
U)
LL
Group M
V-B existing sales
building
(+/-) 463 sf
d
= 100.5'___]
2" underground conduit for
clooropeners
zo
imaginary lot line for FSD Cq
CD
"0" fire resist. rated wall Cn
existing accessible stall
60
Lr)
and route
ZO
0
0
0-)
00-
z
Datum: + 99 00
south rim MH lid
property corner PIK
kPPS0,VED Sy pLANNING
C\I
C\1
Note: This site plan is submitted for obtaining
a retaining wall permit only. All dimensions and
distances to structures, etc. are from public
records and are to be assumed as
approximate.
General Note
1)Contractor shall verify all dimensions, elevations and
conditions pertaining to the work at the site before prooeding with
the work, and shall report any discrepancies in writing to the
archftecL
2)AJI work shall conform to all state, federal, city and/or county of
jurisdiction codes, regulations, and ordinances, and be done to
the highest standards of craftsmanship by journeymen in their
respective trades.
3)reseived.
4)Contractor shall maintain the job clear of trash and debris. All
waste material shal be removed from site prior to substantial
completion and prior to final acceptance.
5)These documents do not include the necessary components
for construction safety. Safety, care of adjacent properties during
construction, shoring of excavated soil cuts and compliance with
all regulations regarding safety shall be the contractors
responsibility.
6)Contractor shall carry Insurance such as, but not limited to, "all
risk" insurance and other coverage as deemed necessary by the
owner.
7) No specifications book or project manual Is associated with
this work.
8)reserved.
9) The Architect assumes no responsibility for the physical
characteristics of the soil or the accuracy of engineering services
supplied by others.
10) Do not scale drawings. Contractor or his sub -contractors
shall report any discrepancies, or requests for clarifications, in
writing to the architect.
11) This document has been prepared for Permit Application and
is subject to review and modifications by governmental agencies.
12) reserved.
re v0,0 ",5
zone 21
IdLcks RMgred Actual
Front
Sides — ------ 0—
Rear
other
sales building and market
22124 Hwy 19--,,,
no barriers to passage
0)
t property line
o
PARKING SPACES REOD._
'PARKING SPACES PROPOSED.
BARRIER FREE PARKING SPACES:
Project Site
Vicinity Ma 0
no saale 12 north
Parcel Description
Address: 22310 Hwy 99 Edmonds,WA 98020
Parcel No. 27042900306600
Description of Work
Retaining Wall
(+/-) 52'-0" '\,
24"dbh 4
fence encroachment by :�Apt. 131d1g. Ul
this parcel see L---,4r hem N , 0
a, 8. 81 B.
AF#96080950011 7- 7- 8' 8'
r- t 4- -4- -4. - L- L _LJ L-1
N 0*44'00" W 125.00'
+11.00,
approx. toe o
embankment.
No change to
iexisting ACP throughou
for outdoor auto storage
(no increase in parking)
S 0'3 6'41 " E 184.17' Ll
185.33'
existing ACP throughout
for outdoor auto storage
00
11tvk In_
%7&
5' horiz. dist.
interval marks.
(for wall height)
+, P.00,
F earth 8. ;r)
m+ 6.00'
landscapin 0) 00 >1
M
Ld LU
CL bo
Ln
existing buildings + 4.00'
C%J
'Al 1131 0
00
e rA'�
proposed 2.00'
retaining wall
22"Hwy 99
STREET FILE
Work Location on Lot z
Scale: 1 " = 30 ft
existing
sales
building
511
(assumed
+ 0.00' elevations)
note:
Bo typ. bottom of wall
Cn (+/-)0.50'
00
r
Ln
0
0
0)
co
z
existing
accessible stall
and route
Datum: + 100-00
south rim MH lid
property corner PK
REVISION DATE BY
MARK
/P2\ 5/23/06 'comment
plan'g.dept.
5/23/06 comment
14 5/23/06 plan'g.dept.
comment I
CiTY OF EDMONDS
M j.—
LLJ c
UJ C-)
M
UJ 12
C,=
Cl= LLJ
LLJ
Cl=
LLJ
z
Z
L
UJ
00
Cl-
CL
LL
V/A�u
architdicts
4 M�d
1
Stephen Waite, AIA
111 Durbin Lane
Edmonds, WA 98020
phone (425) 774. 5533
fax (425) 774. 1930
waitearch@comcast.net
RETAINING WALL
PROJECT LOCATION:
22310 Hwy 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
0 2006 Stephen C. Waite, AtA.
PERW�LW�IT*TAL
This document has been prepared for
Permit Application and is subject to review
nd modifications by governmental
gencles.
DATE: 04/20/06
REV: 05/29/06
SHEET NUMBER:
1 of 2