22619 95TH PL W.PDFiiiiii iiiiii
9368
22619 95TH PL W
ADDRESS:
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 4d 54'�/g " 0 ZeO
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS:, 1�9',57-5(p DETERMINATION: [] Conditional Waiver tudy Required F
_] Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
LID #:
BLOCK:
LATEMP\DS'Ps\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc
#P20 CA File NO: 06 -!�o
.Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
1. Site Address/ Location: or2lif
Property Tax Account Number: 6
2.
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): TAM Z'ff 4 A 6 E.
1w %Wjq.M-
4. Is this site currently developed? yes; _ no.. irth
If yes; how is site developed? Wtl
5.
�1-
7.
W. -v� *
Describe the general site topography. Check, h-1 -
Flat less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling- slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth:
Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth: . ,
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
Flows are seasonal? - (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
For City Staff Use 6nly (I =o4
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable?
2. Site is Zoned? PIS -91
3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? U - A (otr
4.
Is.
Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site?
Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?
DETERMINATION
STUDY REQUIRED
Reviewed by,
�-110
5 /os7
WAIVER
I
J-�l - S-4L I KL C>r" L",L- 4VIIIN r 1-4 > IP4 1. t'
#P20
City of Edmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist
be filled out by
Permi't A
The pWs�e of R#IW
g' of I J&JJ#1faff to
det�p, ti OMticaTAreas are, or
s
su
u je
ec
ct
may J t property. ne information
neededl 1b 'complete the Checklist should be easily
available fi-o ni observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil
surveys)- RECE IVED
APR 1. 9 2005
Date Received: q-lq- a,5
City Receipt#: . .2(0 R�o Cf
Critical Areas File #;->-�00-5 —QZ!�
Critical Areas Checklist Fee:----$135.00
Date Mailed to Applicant:,L -T — / -7—c2001
1PP property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
filli;ut the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
C . The City will review the checklist.make a
&Pwsory site visit and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form.. In
addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent
information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their prelinuinary assessment of the site.
VLHMI I UOUNT
ngl.
The undersigned applicant� an s/her/its heirs, and assigns,:in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City.of Edmonds harmless from ainy and all dama es, including reasonable
9
attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false,' misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information famished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By, my signature, I cer* that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authorized to file this mpliqation on the behalf of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTIAGENT LJ kV V 11 XI+M 111VI, DATE
Property Owner's Authorization � J
By my signature, I cer* that I have authohied the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER -
Owner/AppHcant:
V4 9V 111
Name
Street Address
EPWRKI WA I �0?-o
city Stite Zip
Telephone: Y2-5--
Email address (optional):
DATE Y-/q- 6t;-
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
GMJf-bE .1 WA
city State zip
Telephone: Xt,-
Email Address (optional):W&Awfli�Emwam
W
0
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT
Site Location: 22619 — 95 th Place W. Tax Acet. Number: 00 5443 000 07 700
Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-05-56
Applicant: Amy Frerker Owner: Michael & Carol Clark
Case Design & Project Management
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CA-05-56)
During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain critical
areas, including Geologically Hazardous areas, pursuant to Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC).
GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS
Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject
property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any
potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development
proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a
mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and
delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to
complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific
development application.
Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are
listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types
of critical areas (see below).
Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as
defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study
and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the
Planning Division for more information.
General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110
through 23.40.140.
STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area.
• A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and
with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated
bedrock).
• Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.B.
• In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above,
specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in
ECDC 23.80.050.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS
Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer.
• Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical
Engineer.
• The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced.
The buffer can b It to a minimum of ten (11
e red 0) feet (with an additional 15' building
setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in
ECDC 23.80.050). The alteration must also meet the requirements listed ECDC
23.80.060.
In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with
the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3.
ALLOWED ACTIVITIES
Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC
23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development
qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information.
EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements
(ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt,
contact a Planner for more information.
Name
!, 2005
Date
NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on
the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
P)
(X. AND DRAINAGF
BY ENGINEERING---
gul I Im
IL
In, Jim-
m0m-1
EXST. iMIRC61N GRADE
OCtKIERY
EXST.
CONIC.
A - CM rrA-%�.Y
vq f AEWAr 2140
5TOWS��o -(AWE
�77 . !!- ELEVi +lm:2�
SOUTH PROP, LINE 181'-4-3/4"
;OT_FT- a CAT11 lASIl ON WEST SIDE 01 IOAD
USED FOR DATUM POINT
J* 74'-5)t
ELEVt 1(my-o" WWI 9
EXISTING TWO
I'TORY RESIDENCE
080 SF (IST FLOOR)
1,1082 SF IND FLOOR)
RLEVe 991-41
24 I -opt
LOT COVERAGE:
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCS.
HEIGHT CALCS:
1966 SO, FT, (13.3%)
EXISTING BUILDING ROOF OUTLINE: 1080 sf. (Const. 1974)
A=1071-91,
LOT AREA.
EXISTING DRIVEWAY: 1790 St. (Const, 1974)
B = 100'-0'
147810 $0. FT.
EXISTING WALKWAY: 60 sf. (Const 1974)
C=99-8"
PROPOSED ADDITION: 498 Sf,
PROPOSED CONC. SLAB: 225 sf,
TOTAL EMSTING: 2930 of,
TOTAL PROPOSED: 722 sf.
TOTAL EX, + PROPOSED: 3652 sf,
D=105'11"
21) -3 It
452-312
� I
1 DO'
Lo
AM A%.sh
ul
ATUL L I;R
C%4
ELM 99141
TO MNNECT TO EX19T.
61'-9 '$
ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE
MATERIAL
RE:CEIVEED
SQ R 35
SCH 40
APR 1 9 2005
N-12 OR
M,
PERMIT COUNTER NORTH
P L'8� N
APRIL-12,2005
CLARK RESIDENCE - ADDITION
SCALE: 1 " = 20'
AVE GMDE=103'-4" 22619 95TH PL, W. EDMONDS, WA 98020
ACTUAL= 118'-8 1/2" ` '% N
MMIMUM=1031-41 + 251-01, =128'4" APPLI " T COPY
le
zqt6. S-4
GRESUB
MAY 19 .2005
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
C-M OF EDMONDS
March 16, 2005
T9 GAU1 GROUP Project 1343-01
Geotechnical Consulting
Tony Case
Case Design and Project Management
3903 E. James Street
Seattle, WA 98122
Subject: Geotechnical Reconnaissance
Clark Residence
22619 - 95th Place W
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Tony:
On May 9, 2005, a geotechnical engineer from The Galli Group visited the above referenced site
to evaluate the existing foundation and soil conditions. 'Me site is located on the East side of
95th Place W. at the toe of a slope that ascends to the North at an inclination of about 80 percent
for a total vertical distance of about 20 feet before flattening out again- The purpose of our site
visit was to evaluate the influence on the existing slope from constructing an addition on the
southeastern end of the existing residence. As shown architectural site plan, proposed addition
will be situated about 20 horizontal feet away from the toe of the steep slope.
Geologic and Soil Conditions
The existing house is situated on the south -facing slope of a draw that traverses a north -south
trending ridge. Geologic maps of the area indicate that the site is likely underlain by glacial till
and Advance Outwash (Geologic Map ofthe Edmonds East andpart ofthe Edmonds West
Quadrangles, Washington, James P. Minard, 1983). Glacial till generally consists of unsorted
mixtures of silt, clay, sand and gravel, "smeared" over the topography in front of the advancing
glacier thousands of years ago. It was subsequently compacted by tons of ice. Glacial till tends
to appear very dense, and can stand unsupported in near -vertical relief. When disturbed by
moisture and traffic it can become unworkable.
Advance outwash generally consists of glaciofluvial deposits of pebbly gravel and sand
deposited in front of the glacier and then overridden by the advancing ice. The risk of erosion is
greater in the granular advance outwash deposits than in the glacial till deposit. Advance
67R North 201 Lane, Seattle, Washington 98133 o Phone.(206) 546-8901 - Fax (206) 542-7625
Clark Residence — 22619 — 95 1h Place W.
May 11, 2005
outwash generally appears stable when undisturbed and can stand in slopes approaching 100
percent if groundwater or surface water runoff is not present.
We walked the property and noticed evidence of sandy gravel in shallow excavations for the
fence, as well as where soil was exposed on the slope. Sand and gravel was also evident in open
trenches being excavated on 95h Place. The observed soil appears more similar to advance
outwash than glacial till, indicating that the site is likely situated near or below . the contact
between the glacial till and the advance outwash.
We did not observe any indications of slope movement on the site. Mature Douglas Fir trees
dotted the slope and no evidence of surficial. erosion was evident. Surficial runoff is not directed
toward the top of the slope from the property north of the site. No evidence of groundwater
seepage was observed during our site visit. The existing basement wall and timber wall appeared
to be functioning without distress. We observed no evidence of foundation settlement or
cracking during our visit.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based upon our geotechnical reconnaissance, the existing slope appears stable in its current
condition. The proposed site improvements will not adversely impact the slope or slope system.
Planned excavations consist of shallow excavations for spread footings. These will not adversely
affect the existing slope or neighboring properties.
The proposed addition will be situated about ten feet from the toe of a small portion of the slope
(inclined at about 30 percent) and about 30 feet from the toe of the steep slope (inclined at about
80 percent as shown in attached site plan). This is sufficient to avoid risk to the current slope
stability. We recommend restricting excavation on the steep slope and within 10 feet of the toe
of the steep slope except for repair of fencing and similar minor soil disturbance.
rom points of
Site soils are subject to severe erosion potential if left unprotected, particularly f
concentrated discharge, or side slopes from open excavations. We recommend covering
stockpiled soil with plastic sheeting during inclement weather, and revegetating the exposed soils
once construction is complete. A silt fence should be erected on the downhill side of the
disturbed soil areas to prevent migration of sediment off site.
Limitations and Additional Services
The above recommendations are based upon observations of surficial. soil conditions encountered
in our research and limited site reconnaissance.. If conditions are encountered during
construction that vary significantly from those anticipated we should be advised so that we can
revise our recommendations if necessary. This report is not intended as a warranty of the
subsurface conditions. The above work was performed in general conformance with the state of
practice for geotechnical engineering within the state of Washington within the limited scope of
work for this project.
13521UTO 2 of 3 The Galli GrouP
th
Clark Residence — 22619 — 95 Place W.
May 11, 2005
Please do not hesitate to call if you have questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
2 T ALL
x I .
7" ! Z (
Paul L. Stoltenberg, P.E.
Project Geotechnical Engineer
Attached: Figure 1: Vicinity MaP
Figure 2: Portion of Site Plan (reduced scale)
(-05--
11.152hrrot 3 of 3 The Galli Group
0
Clark Residence: 22619 W 95th P1, Edmonds, 98020, Page & Grid 474 HI CLARK RESIDENCE 1-15UKr- I
It/A"
Olt
--------- Sides 7.5
1, '1-, \ � \1 "I Rear
t \Date:
Q NORTH PROP. LINE 181'-4-3/4'
0
—q
-41=
4WD
07'-W
10'
Lu
EX. WAW 4VV�--
ELEV: 1001-W
JLLJ vi-4—
:3
EXISTING TWO
RY RESIDENCE
1c.3 fA �MtrAfY �4� 1080 SF (IST FLOOFQ
I z !% 1082 SF 04D FLOOR)
IN T.66EWAV-
E . 4r ELEV: 9W-W
/IQ QMNE )T.
-4-3/4"
SOUTH PROP LINE 181'
+1 4r L -- — — — — — — — — 24 —of$
TT- EX CATCH BASIN ON WEST SIDE 01 ROAD
USED FOR DATUM POINT
74P-5)f
SS
LOT COVERAGE: IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCS.
1966 SQ.FT. (13.3%) EXISTING BUILDING ROOF OUTLINE: 1080 sf. (Const. 1974)
LOT AREA. EXISTING DRIVEWAY: 1790 sf. (Const. 1974)
147810 SQ.FT. EXISTING WALKWAY: 60 sf. (Const. 1974)
PROPOSED ADDITION: 498 sf.
PROPOSED CONC. SLAB: 225 sf.
TOTAL E)aSTING: 2930 sf.
TOTAL PROPOSED: 722 sf.
TOTAL Ek + PROPOSED: 3652 of.
APPROVED AS NOTEU
BY ENGIYERING
ALL EXPOS
21 P-3ft
ELEVi 1051.11"
EXST. StfiIRSFON Z�RADE
r>
-EXST. —!�O(�KERY
PROPOSED CONIC.
VJ--1z7- %SLAB
ELM 99%4'— ---7#
WATPaf- L Wf�
ELEV; 991-8"
EXST. FENCE
Zone-- Corner Flag_
TO Setback Required Actual
kvQ Fnxt 2-5- .39, -
0
L0
0
�n C-3
C)
0
m
CD
CD
M
K.
451-3ft L 61'-9 of
ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLAE APPROVED BY PLANNING
MATERIAL
MR 35
SCH 40 v
HEIGHT CA=: N-12
A=107-9' F810 HMCOR NORTH
B=100'-O"
C=W-8" PLOT PLAN APRIL 12,2005
D=105'11" CLARK RESIDENCE - ADDITION SCALE: 1 u = 20'
AVEGRADE=103!4' 22619 95TH PL. W. EDMONDS, WA 98020
ACTUAL=118'-81/2'
MAXIMUM= 1034' + 25'-0" = 1294"
STREET FILE
978M
ST RE
flesue
PIR 19 2005
WIL01to t)epww-a-v
dv OF aii*De
Dv �W�Elmtr--)
0VW,WWYAY.lM4tC—V4)
MOPOSED COK. SLA8. M 4
TO &�—t
TO MWFOSMMil.
TOTAU, MM�.-Zd.
AppFOED By
GENERAL NOTES
1.) .0 .1
=K,: ZI
DESIGN LOADS:
PROJECT INFORMATION:
clp� Sim Lo* W7
SE&X DE" ITEI m
REV.
5
�04:�2:20
05 8 2005
FLOOR AREAS
�MT�
9
=' " ==—
V�SE��
im.
—
WOM
WROORAWTUt
mv
SXTOT�
TOT.
—9
p.)
HEIGHT CALCULATIONS:
SCOPE OF WORK:
m7m �T021QS`TVWr0ly
7 711.
4VEPL�EGRAMKX�. —
11—
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
To— —m.$EcT"u.wmTuu
LOT COVERAGE CALCS.-
Lot— 1410 SF
3/1'
- ---------------
— — — — — — — — — — 1
0,
- — — —
. . . . . . . . . . .
- — — — — —
sin
10'
u
.. . ... .... ....
Z
VICINITY MAP: (9
"STM Mo E�XE
g
J,
IMSF 00FLOOM
;z
.O;ow Tm'� ADDrION
a —
EX CATCH BASIN ON WEST SIDE OF ROAD
USED FOR DATUM POINT
ogwoRogm
/v
cl
INDEX:
—w
I IR—
A 0 GEN NOTES,SITEPLAN, GALDESCRIPTION
1 LE
Al I E)L 1ST&2ND FLOOR PLANS
A21 FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PI ANS
A22 ROOF PLAN
A31 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A32 BUILDING SECTIONS & WALL SECTION
S21 FOUNDATION & 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLANS
A1.0
S22 ROOF FRAMING PLAN
S2 3 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
S2.4 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
Page 1 of L,
ME&
Zulauf, JoAnne
From: CADD casedesign [caddcasedesign@msn.com] RESUB
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 3:00 PM
To: zulauf@ci.edrnonds.wa.us APR 19 200"!
Subject: Case Design: Clark Residence -Topographic Revisions to Sheet A1.0 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
cM OF EDMONDS
Dear Ms. Zulauf,
I've attached a PDF of the revised sheet A1.0. The changes that were made to this sheet were,
just to the topographic contour lines running around the North side of the house. The noted
elevations and elevation calculations were correct.
I hope this information is enough to go on. Thank you for your help in getting this resolved. If
you have any questions you can email me back here, or call me at 206-328-2520.
Sincerely,
-Tim Rahn
Case Design
11
5/19/2005
0 0
PLANNING DATA
NAME: Mirhafl & Carol r-larW_ DATE: ryl oAA '6 r of , 7�-o o &3
SITEADDRESS: 7.4�(Vlq 61 1VI Fla(e; Wt6l PLANCHK#: 05-li�j
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 9,1QVjiAr0.6TDry addi�ivn ID micitin!a 111ID-A' '51PP,
Unctgd.e,�, m9laumrvit, of- &eCj!=)
REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: & N
jo
MAP PAGE: 10 CORNER LOT: FLAG LOT: (YYes �No
ZONING:- P-.5 s -CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATIONM 'P005- 0015(o
0 Study Required: A arld 91 f 016 "djtarj�, OLYCa,
Ll Waiver (Ylt�ecj Ietj'C'Y -f-meyi &C.0'TeGV% 5,u itik, 6rhy Am-, 31itwoq
Ll Conditional Waiver
SEPA DETERMINATION: 6)(4r, VA ?4-
U Fee
U Checklist
Ll APO list w/ notarized form
L3 (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger)
0 Exempt( 11 (,Y40)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Street: 2 W Left Side: -4.5 Right Side: Rear:
Actual Setbacks: -tv a4dVil
Street: cl!9' Left Side: TV Right Side: Rear: (0
Street map checked for additional setback required? es-) No DNA)
L3 DETACHED STRUCTURES: n0l3t 9,Y10Wn `-., n o mt r cA tA
ROCKERIES: R.%1*6,tino re_taMfV1 5 WOLIJ 5VIO W Yj
FENCES/TRELLISES: 4VU911VIS fC*-jrP, S �jc)Wvj
BAY WINDOWS/ PROJECTING MODULATION: 6V)0WV) 0Y) 51+r, P
STAIRS/DECKS: VXC91hV15 VY1 5V-41.61'C 9V10WV1) dc0l- -shown
PARKING: Required: I- Actual: 1, ( meets S��loa cld-s )
LOT AREA: I 4-+e 10 4' ot a �Ycd: T-1, 0 " A I g I , 5 9 to Cl T�
LOT COVERAGE = ICJ43
Calculations: I ol (9 (.p 115. 5 Y- i Y t V% LD�fc�*IIC -3 (0-04 4994'4-1092,4'
BUILDING HEIGHT: 4-Aj&tjn5 CA+th 10401VI 01A W-CSt -A CZ TC4-a
Datum Point: tp (&k of "a A Datum Elevation: + I Iq
Maximum Allowed: 1-61 W2191 411) Actual Height(J-11-9 180") 15' 4.5
A.D.U. CREATED?& Yes -
SUBDIVISION: ?Mf. GYr_tr+ 1511,- 000 Q- 010 TF- (93-
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: ()Le—s@
OTHER:
Plan Review By: aA6�&Z
U
NewBPPlanningDataForrn. DOC
IUM01 Ovv 219001 1 21900
906 21910 21911 =21-1�1M 21915 21830 <
1141 21900 1 0
21821 21823
900 2191,6
902 904 21920 21919 9630 21912 21909 21902 2190912190ii
9415 9413
2 '-' 21 g905, 2 '9'5 2 8 30
21.0. 2 '.02
2
21925 �947 L.O 7
9417 9407
T
22004
22004 22005 22004 22005 22006 22011 .14 !D 9304 '2 220G4�
22014
22015 22014 22"5 22014
_j
— — 22014
IL (L 22017 1201 22017
22024 M 22017 22022 2014 22010 22016 t2
t; 22022
1221 M 22027 22030
22 29 220 22020
1223 22034 L11 27 22028
-- 22032
22039 22102 22104 22103
22042 o o 0 22106
7.-9 2204d32 22108 —
22115 22112 22109 22109
22110 2.2114
22044 NOSTSW 22124 22,16 —
8-52 22122 22121 22M 22122 21,
22050 22052 22053 22051 22124 Westgate — —
22MS 22203 22128 22129 22129 22130 221:
f 22007 lementa
1237 ry 22210
22 14
22205 22206 22205 22205 22204� 2221
9601 22206
22009
22214
1251 22221 22225 22224 22218 22221 22219 — 22215 22216 222
22220 22218 22208 22209
22223 —
22220 22229 22223 22228 22227 222
1259 22229 22226 22228 22222
301 22224 22221 22220
2300 2230 223"03
22304 22305 22302 22226 22301 22304 22301 22:
2314 22311111 :--]7
223014 22306
22310 22311 22308 22307 22314 3: 22' r2231 0 3: i
22311
tu — — W w
> 22311 >
232. 3* L" LwU
�j 22315 > 0 22314
IL < 22315 22314 < _3 1 223171
22320 22317 IL
x I I
22326 fz
,C) 9717 22320 cli
2323
9601 -21 -17
R 1� F 22318
224TH ST SW
I
22407
>
<
99ia
9902 9820
9808
401 �2
�22
22408 22407 22406
11
22405
417
22415
—
1224211
22416
_
4
JE
-
22414 22415 22414
1".
40
4 0
423
22422 22421
22405
22]
22408
22408
22423
22425
22424
—
22422 22421 22422
—
2 4 1
241
413
22423
— —
22428 22427 22428
22413
22412
22413
22416
22413 22416
22
22427 22 2 22431
22432
—
2 2 4 2
2242
439
42
22413
�J�
22430 [-5.3 22SU
22421
22420
22421
22420
22421 22420
22420
4"45
9855 9845
22504
22SO9
—
Edmonds
--
22429
--
22606
--
22507
22506
22507 22506
22_-
5 0
2250
1"9
9924
05 9835
22506
22515
Presbyterian
22511
22510
22511
5
-
22510
-
22511 �;T2f2l 0 11
_5
2251
�57]
9w 9825
22522
22521
Church
22515
—
22514
?2515
515
r2.251
—
22514 4
10
_52
2252
'k,
22*526
—
—
22515 225161!
.516
9
22531
22600
22519
22518
9
22516
22517 22518
2253
2603
4P 9807
22606
226
226TH
PL SW
22605
22605
-
22604
-
22604
226,05
226(
-
ON9 0
9909
22615
22608
22808
22609 22608
.6
9816
22618
-- —
9916
2.2618
226217--3
22612
22613
22612
2.2613 22612
1 226;
1 22615
9908
J!!701�
9715 22628
22629
22620
22619
3.
22620
22619 221G4
9827
22710
7TH
S&V 9713 22710
w
>
<
22711
22 06
-j
0- 22705 22708
3:
-j
22706 IL
— 3:
w
7.1
9821
9724
9709 22718
0
Cr
22705 22 06
— I
sw
22712
W
> 22717
22719
(D 22715
22 2e
9820
—
< 9706
x 9705
22727
9513
22721
9509
J
9826
22714
22731
9702 9701 22726
9505
22723
92031
22805
2280 22805 22803
22815
22811
22809
NDS WAY
22815
228
PL SW
22804
WestgatQ
1.
22810
X 22SG6\
Chapely
221
22808
9 #P20
0
1P. 167 -
City of Edmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist
be filled out by any
Permit AbnlisaM am
The pNMjig�eoif aff to
t
, d t ' k r
de' rn Ms�u j e c�t I itoicaRe"asa e, or
may property. The information
ne&le*d complete the 'Checklist should be easily
available from observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas invefitories, maps, or soil
surveys)- 'RECEIVED'
APR I � 9 2005
DateReceived: q-N-W)
City Receipt #: a(0 gl� Cf
Critical Areas File
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00
Date Mailed to Applicant,,_�- 1-7-c�001
W property owner, or. his/her authorized representative,
fill out the. checklist,. sign and date it, and submit it
e City. The City will review the checklist,.make a
awwry site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff ;in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the "applicant. shall include other pertinent
information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
--ftf bdiiCpldtiiig—ttidii�-preliminary assessment of the site.
The undersigned appli6an�'idi(Tliis/herfits heirs, and assigns, 'in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indernnify, defend and hold the City.of Edmonds harmle s*s from any and all damages, including r easonable
attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false,* misleading,' inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished*by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By. my signature, I certih( that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authorized to file this li ation on the behalf of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTIAGENT —DATE—
Property Owner9s Authorization
By my signature, I cer* that. I ba autho ed the above Applicant/Agent to apply. for. the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property forthe
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE Of OWNER -
Owner/Appficantt
WAVI
Name.
Street Address
EDWRMI WA Itozo
city Stite zip
DATE
Applicant Representative:.
&Y H tv: W
4,A\,KF1rZ /
Name
Street Address
Gf �ATf WA
city State Zip
Telephone: Y2-5-- 4 -73 Telephone: )_C526
Email address (optional):
#P20 CAFileNo-
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/vegetation)
1.. Site Address/ Location: vuell orgif ry N
2. Property Tax Account Number: 6 0 ff 22
F
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet)- L ---a +
##Al� , " T
7.
4: Is this site currently developed? X yes; no. b".4,
_J70,
If yes; how is site developed?
that apply-
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all
Flat less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than .15% (a vertical rise. of .10-feet over a hdkzontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site, of more than 15% and less than 30%. (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over. a. horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site� contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx.. Depth.
7... Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ;Approx. Depth:.
What season(s) of ihe year?
8. Site is in the floodw�y floodplain 'a water course..
9. Site contains -a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
Flow's are seasonal? (What time of �year7
10. Site is, primarily: forested meadow ;shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetlafid is pies�nt on site:
1 0=4
For City Staff Use Only
1. Plan Check Number, if,4ppficable?.
2. Site is Zoned? PIS -, 21
3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? U A (otr woo- - Lk m &.A S C.&I j
Critical Areas inventory -or C.A. map indicates Critical Area. on site?. No
5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? No
DETERMINATION
STUDY REQUIRED
WAIVER
Reviewed
57
CITY OF EDMONDS
CRITICAL AREAS- RECONNAISSANCE REPORT
Site Location: 22619 — 95 th Place W. Tax Acct. Number: 00 5443 000 07 700
.Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-05-56
Applicant: Amy Frerker Owner: Michael & Carol Clark
Case Design & Project Management
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDYREQUIRED (CA-05-56)
During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain critical
areas, including Geologically Hazardous areas, pursuant to Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC). a
GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS
Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject
property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any
potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development
proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a
mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and
delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to
complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific
development application.
Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are
listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types
of critical areas (see below).
Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as
defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study
and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the
Planning Division for more information.
General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110
through 23.40.140.
STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area.
• A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and
with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated
bedrock).
• Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.13.
• In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above,
specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in
ECDC 23.80.050.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS
Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer.
• Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical
Engineer.
• The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is -reduced.
• The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building
setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in
ECDC 23.80.050). The alteration must also meet the requirements listed ECDC
23.80.060.
• In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with
the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3.
ALLOWED ACTIVITIES
Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC
23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development
qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information.
EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements
(ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt,
contact a Planner for more information.
ruwell
Name
ure
Date
NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on
the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
2
NOTE: IF DRAWING SHEET IS NOT 24* X 36" THEN DRAVANG IS NOT TO SCALE.
25 0-0"
yq
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCS.
GENERAL NOTES:
EXISTING BUILDING ROOF OUTLINE: 1080 sf. (Const. 1974)
1.) MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS ARE TO BE BUILDER DESIGNED.
VERIFY MECHANICAL SUPPLY AND RMRN LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT.
EXISTING DRIVEWAY: 1790 sf. (Const. 1974)
2.) ELECTRICAL PERMITS ARE BY:lLECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. MECHANICAL PERMITS
EXISTING WALKWAY: 60 sf. (Const. 1974)
ARE BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.
. PROPOSED ADDITION: 498 sf.
3.) CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLF'FOR PROVIDING ALL WORK AND MATERIALS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAS, CODES, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS.
PROPOSED CONC. SLAB: 225 st
4.) ALL WORK AFFECTING NEW AND OWNG UTILITY SERVICE TO THE BUILDING
OTAL EXISTING: 2930 sf.
SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE UTIUIY,. PROPERTY OWNER AND THE CRY OF EDMONDS
TOTAL PROPOSED: 722 sf.
5.) DO NOT SCALE DIMENSIONS FROM DRAWINGS. USE CALCULATED DIMENSIONS
TOTAL Ek + PROPOSED: 3652 sf.
ONLY. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIA7ELY-. IF CONFLJdTS EXIST.
6.) CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT JOB SITE,- AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
EXISTING CONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. DISCREPANCIES,
IF ANY, ARE TO BE REFERRED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR DIRECTION PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH RELATED WORK.
7.) VERIFY ALL ROUGH -IN DIMENSIONS FOR EQUIPMENT FIXTURES AND OTHER ITEMS.
PROVIDE ALL BUCK -OUTS, BLOCKING, BACKING AND JACKS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION.
8.) VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES: CAP, MARK, AND PROTECT AS
NECESSARY TO COMPLErE THE WORK.
9.) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REVIEW OF MECHANICAL
AND ELECTRICAL DESIGNS AND FOR CGORDINATIING WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
CONTRACTORS BEYOND THAT DESCRIBED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DOCUMENTS.
10.) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSUL7 DRAWINGS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS OF ALL
TRADES FOR ALL OPENINGS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
AND INSTALLATION OF DUCTS, PIPES, CONDUITS, EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES, AND CABINETS,
AND SHALL VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION.
11.) PROVIDE CLOSURE, MEEnNG THE R EQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNING FIRE
AUTHORITIES, BETWEEN ALL FIRE RATED FLOORS, SHAFTS AND BUILDING PARTITIONS,
AND ANY PENETRATING DUCTS, PIPES, CONDUIT, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL. AND
OTHER ITEMS.
12.) ALL CONTRACTOR INSTALLED ITEMS7SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH MECHANICAL AND
ELECTRICAL SERVICES AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE FOR THE FULL OPERATION OF THE
ITEMS INSTALLED.
DESIGN LOADS:
GROUND SNOW LOAD: 25 PSF
WIND SPEED: 85 mph
SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY: D2
FLOOR AREAS:
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR:
1080 SF
EXISTING SECOND FLOOR:
10132 SF
SUBTOTAL:
2162 SF
FIRST FLOOR ADDITION:
392 SF
SECOND FLOOR ADDITION:
498 SF
SUBTOTAL: 890 SF
TOTAL: 3052 SF,
HEIGHT CALCULATIONS:
GRADE POINTS AT BLDG RECTANGLE:
A:
10T-9"
B:
100'-0"
C:
99'-80
D:
106-11"
AVERAGE GRADE POINT:
103'41.
ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT:
118A'1/2'
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:
103'4'+ 26-0" 1264'
9%0
vMer
He
LOT AREA: 14810 SF
BLDG FOOTPRINT: 1966 SF
18 V-4,,�/4" e-
CALCULATION: 1966 SF / 14810 SF 13.3%
NORTH PROP. LINE 181'-4-3/411
LOT SLOPE: 20%
%T� ....................
AM TOTAL GRADING: 11 c.y. (NO GRADING PLAN REQUIRED, PER
0 #B61)
Lu
C4
SITE
0
L". lor_r
ELEV- 1 OV-11�'�
E --ELEV_l"-9-7
I L
PROJECT INFORMATION:
PROJECT LOCATION: 22619 95TH PL W.
EDMONDS, WA 98020
OWNER: MICHAEL & CAROL CLARK
TAX ASSESSOR'S f: 00544300006700
JURISDICTION: CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B
ZONING: RS-8
ARCHITECT: CASE DESIGN & PROJECT MANAGEMENT
ATTN.: TONY CASE
3903 EAST JAMES STREET
SEATTLE, WA 98122
(206) 328-2520
SCOPE OF WORK:
890 SF TWO STORY ADDITION TO 2162 SF TWO-STORY
RESIDENCE. WORK INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF SECOND
STORY DECK
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PINE CREST BLK 000 D-00-TR 67
NEIGHBORHOOD - 1605000
TOWNSHIP 27, RANGE 03, SECTION 25, QUARTER SE
Zone . , Comer Flag
ge_tbacks Reguired Actual
Front
Sides
Rear
EXST. ROCKERY
\cq
DENOTES BUILDING RECTANGLE FOR HEIGHT 0
uj
CALCULATIONS PER CITY OF EDMONDS
LA_
PROPOSED CON��l
C. I Al2
LOT COVERAGE CALCS.:
To PO A 2 0 EU IW-W NOM
cz
744-- VICINITY MAP:
10 EXISTING TWO 8fbRyRESIDENCE A OV A?FK04. WATION Or
C"
Effl ks -NqT
LL_ C PF R NOT M SCALE
0 108'0 SF (I ST FLOOR) C E GH IN _A5ANwAL5D 1 0
U3 /1911 Y ENGINEERING
1082 SF (2ND FLOOR)
aL, R 5 W5
4
uj
Z I X10 12
RECEIVED
w F8 H ; 0 Date: �3 fla
Z G%wy!5f WfK PR OS ST AD ITI APR 1 9 2005
EXST. DRIV VATR fr. 392 (1 FL C4 PERMIT COUNTER
E%_ wrNly ND 00
INDEX:
ELEV: 9W4' ELEV-z 19 Al
QMER&i) - .0 GEN. NOTES, SITE PLAN, LEGAL DESCRIPTION
'j-0 MNNFCIT To FxpsT. Sye;,,r. Bjo__� I
A2.1 FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PLANS
C I
^ I r
STS 23'-11 3/4 21'-3 1/4- 61'-9"
>Tcl ST 1-cl I - L A9 9 Pnn P1 AN
-7 A
SOUTH PROP. LINE 1811-4-3/4" 45'-3"
OWNERICONTRWCO�TOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO
ONTROL AND DRAINAGE
+100lg EROSION Cf, BE COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS
EX. CATCH BASIN ON WEST SIDE OF ROAD
USED FOR DATUM POINT'
eTOM ��Wff,, PM%PW K64f 0 W
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1/8'= V-0"
! hl
N IN
All BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.2 BUILDING SECTIONS &WALL SECTION
S2.1 FOUNDATION & 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLANS
S2.2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN
4517 A REGISTERM
REV:
04-12-2005
4.4
0
C111
u
cd
7
z
a)
Cj
cq
0
0
-.4
"cl
clq
00
c.,
c)
r-
kn
a)
9z
M
g
N
rn
cd
00
C;
(u
44
6
N
Z
cd
0
en
7�
c!
C,�
-0
cl
c)
�'c
4D
rn
01�
0
C)
C)
cd
I
M
u�
cq
cq
ffll il;
--TD -T
L C)
P,e9�)q `7S'—� PL
CjaAr--,
M-F, --. M 2-, � T
ii
Qf� j 2 ,
119
00,474