Loading...
22717 HIGHWAY 99.PDF11111111111111 11616 22717 HIGHWAY 99 . ;, ( f^, INT#I,,-OFFICE COMMUNICATOINS TO FORM 41 - LITTLE'S SUBJECT: 14 FROM 0 'No DATE Id -3 7 I-r HIAYf 9� 1�1 k7/ Ir.v 0 INT&OFFICE COMMUNICATIONS TO Harry Whitcutt Building Official FORM 41 - LITTLE'S SUBJECT: Hop Scotch House Remodel FROM DATE December 3, 19 74 Dick Allen Assistant City Engineer We have reviewed the site plan submitted with the building permit application and have the following comments to make: 1. The site plan is incomplete in that it does not show the property boundaries correctly or existing driveway conditions. 2. The parking lot on the west side does not meet City requirements. The lot should be redesigned and should include necessary land- scaping. 3. The driveway opening on 76th Avenue W. must be replaced with a standard sidewalk per City Codes. It is recommended that the site plan be redrawn and resubmitted for City approval. RHA: mj r Attachments ImTeRm (1�ocg PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR!t-MU CHEMIST "t3 P ��C-t& 14 (n h�� BUILDING PERMIT RVIEW 2:2,--7 1 -1 WM56,%� <=-�O (ad ess) C. "m I I - M�i Street Right -of -Way Existing LQg���.-��_REQD kf .4 Z Access Easeumts Existing g,4 Utility Easement Existing REQD Lot Per Subdivision Plat Assessor 14ap_.Y_ Site Plan Checked for Accuracy ne Z Underground 14iring Reqd. Check Accuracy of Legal Description Z Review by_ Date, Z�stixig Water Main Size Wate in Required - in R equ ire d ,e u Service i e uired ce U x red Hydrant Size Exist t S ze Ex -st r4 t Reqd Per Fire Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Co C Detector Check Meter Req�d. . m Cross Connection Inspec t> Fire Department ts p r=ent ts__ :3: Wat t- Charge Reqd. Zew b y Date t T 'S� c r ov tic Tank Design Approved p Desi" p p Date S T P ermi R d Sep i Tank Permit Reqd. t ep t eq Permit No. anI ra7 ewe vai ability — Sanit r Availability ary wer A S e Proj. win Dbra' 1 9 No. a =g File No. Side Sewer Avai ility S r Co c .0 Sanitary Sewer Conmnec *on Fee Reqd. Review by Date Open Ditch Existing Reqd. Culvert Reqd. Size c4 Catch Basin Reqd. In t�eon Site 0 Shoulder dr-;a* e maintain collection on swale en f op f _Plarn�.., Manhole, reqd. Indicate on Site Plan C So' Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked 2 ew by v Date Revised: Iv10-1977 Paq age 2 E_4 S P�aving Reqd. Curb and Gutt-e �d— Sidewalk Reqjd. Curb Cut for Driveway Reqd. pd Right -of -Way Constructigi-I �rmit Reqd. E-4 Bond Reqd. for ic Improvements Stree Sign Reqd. ther Signing Reqd._ 151�e t Site Inspection made omn z 0 S BY: SEWER F' WATER H Z. STREET ENGINEERING, Special Requirements listed in mew to Community Development Department, Building Division BY MCW)C) Date o All items filled in an Building Permit Application -71 C4 BY �Date P' Drawing�.Stamped and Notations Made P4 BY Date Approved by Public 'Works Department Revised: 1v 10-1977 Amenities desif�n Board Decemo-r 2, 1974 - Page 2 ADB-54-74 Jack 1-lood-man Associates (continued) DB-65-74 time factor he would like to make some definite coiMmiluments and receive approval tonight. He said he would agrep to hemlocks and increase theim '11 asked Mr. Woodman by 50 percent and go to 12 to 14 feel nigh. M r. G o'! d -, i,, i i L to write down what he would do and they would come back to him when he was ready. Chairman Bernhoft sai.d they would go on to the next item at this ti'me. Robert Akri,.� tror�q. - plans for beauty shop "Hop Scotch House" at 22717 Hignway 99, -Edriionds (CG) Mr. Wailis presented the plans for Hop Scotch House pointing'out that one i tem had been brought to his attenti on by the Eng, n1aering Department wi th relation to, parking. Hr. Wallis stated tiViat they h.ave ample parking but there iS concern that there be some riethod of preventing backing onto 'Highway 99.- There vias general discussion of the parking requirements and the proposed parking plan. Mr. Wallis pointed out that' 2 parking spaces were required and the applicant has shown approximatdv 7. Mr. Goldsmiti h asked if landscaping would be required. Mr. Viallis said.. -the- -code. requi,red-landscaping for 8 or more spaces. There was general discussion with the applicant answering questions. MR. WESTLIN PIADE A'MOTION TO APPROVE ADB-65-74 AS PRESENTED. SECONDED BY R OL S1,11 TH AND'CARRIED. ADB-5LIOO�Jack'Vloodman Associates - Mr. Woodman said he was ready withhis written proposal for landscaping. He stated they would install 8 hemlocks 10-14 feet, doubled the proposed landscaping by 50% and -increased the size of trees from 10-14 feet. 14R. GOLDSMITH MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT BUILDING AND LANDSCAPING, PLANS FOP, JOKNATHAINS, WITH LANDSCAPING PLAN AMENDED AS PRESENTED BY MIR. WOODMAN. MOTION- SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN-AND CARRIED. Mr. Woodman said he would send a copy of the revised plan to the City. ADB-66-74 Mary G. Emery - Parking extension review of Dairy Queen at 620 Edmonds Way(BN) Mr. Wallis stated that Mrs. Emery had been in contact with the City with .regard to the proposed plan. Mr. Wallis presented a plan for proposed parking extension. Mr. Goldsmith asked if the fence went all the way back to the grove of trees. Mrs. Emery stated that the trees to the north side of the parking lot will be retained. She -referred to the plans and pointed t 4 out the loca ion of existing trees and the location of the fence. Mr. Goldsmith asked about the color she was planning to stain the fence. 11-Irs. Emery said she had not been advised by Dairy Queen as to the color but thoughL it would be in 'he brown category. Mr. Goldsmith recommended that it be kept as close to natural looking as possible. Mr. Westlin asked if Mrs. Emery had any plans for the triangle piece of property shown on the plan. Mrs. Emery said it had not been discussed. Mr. Westlin suggested it would be ideal for some. type landscaping and questioned why it had not been a part of the total plan submitted. Mr§. Emery said it just had not been discussed. There was general discussion of that portion of property with Mr. Wallis pointing out that some of the property may lie in the state right-of-way. Mr. Goldsmith referred to the landscapeplan and asked Mrs. Emery if she would consider adding two or three cans of Boston Ivy spaced along the fence. Mr. Goldsmith recommended two or three 40 gal. cans of the Boston.Ivy. Mrs. Emery said she had no object ions at al I . There was discussion of the fence heig�t with Mr. Wallis stating that the code requires a six foot fence when it abutts; residential property. '�Irs. Emery said Dairy Queen had indicated they wanted a 4 or 5. foot fence. Mr. Wallis said when she applied for the fence permit she would be infornmed of all the requirements. Mr. Westlin again suggested that Mrs. Emery consider landscaping the triangle area of property. Mrs. Emery said -she understood that the Edmonds Garden Club might be interested in such areas. !1r. Wallis said he had `been in touch laith the* Garden Club and they would soon be inventorying areas such as this.-for.landscaping. Amen, to ies design Board Deceinber 2, 1974 -0,e AG3-54-74 Jack. Woo�hian Associates (continued) time factor he would like to make some def ini te obtin, i tri-nts and - rec- e approval toni,,J�,,'-. He said hE.., i-iould agre-2 to hemlocks and increase t.11,:7,. `th asked -cldman and go to 12 to 14 feet hirih. f,,,r. Goldsm.1 by SO percent to wri te %-,1'i?t he would do and they viculd come back to him when h-� was re ady. Chairman Bernihol"t said they would go on e next itxem at Jffstime. AD,3-65-7.4 P—lbert Arnstr�,nq - plans for beaut shop "Hop Scotch House" at 22717 Frigh-..,iay 99, Edwonds (CG) 0 0 n n e ne x t i *t m a t 1111" i po N " op 1, h op Scot h Ho e a� �2 1 7 S c us S c lJous 00i i Q out L -ed the plans for Hopp S ci House pointing out that;one Mr. Wallis present -ad been bi-oi uh-1- to his attention b%, 'he Engineerin� Dtpartmen� ith i tem k. i ng. -- -parking bu t relation to park Mr. Wallis stated that they have a,,;..Ie 0 4 there is concern th a t there be some inethod of preventing backing nto 11! , qh.,.,.,ay 99. There was. general discussion of the par�ing requirements and the proposed parking plan. .111r. Wallis pointed out that 2 parking spaces were required and ed if landscaping the applicant has shown approxiiiiatIv 7. Mr. Goldsmith ask would be required. fir. Wallis said -the code required. landscaping for 8 or more spaces. There was general discussion with the applicant answering questions. MR. WESTLIN MADE A V110TION TO APPROVE ADB-65-74 AS PRESENTED. SECONDED BY MR. GOLDSMITH RID CARRIED. ADB-54-74 Jack Woodman Associates - Mr. Woodman said he was ready withhis written -14 f et, proposal for landscaping. fie stated they would install 8 he, locks 10 e doubled the proposed landscapi'ng by 50% and increased the size of trees'- from 'G 10-14 feet. MR. GOLDSMITH.HADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT BUILDING AND LA.NDSCAPIN PLANIS FOR JOHNATIIP�13, WITH LANDSCAPING PLAN AIIENDED AS PRESENTED BY NIR. W4 WOODMAN. MOT'iOH SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN - AND CARRIED. Mr. Woodman said he would send a copy of the revised plan to the City. AD3-66-74 Mary G. Emery Parking extension review of Dairy Queen at 620 Edmonds Way(811) Mr. Wallis stated that Mrs. Emery had been in contact with the City with regard to the proposed plan. Mr. Wallis presented a plan for proposed parking extension.. Mr. Goldsmith asked if -the. fence went all the way back to the grove of trees. Mrs. Emery stated that the trees to the north side LX of the parking lot will be retained. She *refer*red to the plans and pointed out the location of existing trees and the location of.the fence. Mr. Goldsmith asked about the color she was planning to stain the fence. Mrs. Emery said she had not been advised by Dairy Queen as to the color but thought it would be in the brown category. Mr. Goldsmith recommended that it be kept as close to natural looking as possible. Mr. Westlin asked if Mrs. Emery had any plans for the triangle piece of property shown on the plan. Mrs. Emery said it had not been discussed. Mir. landscaping and questioned Westli.n suggested it would be ideal for some type I why it had not been a part of the total 'plan submitted. firs. Emery*said it just had 4, not been discussed. There was general discussion of that por6ion of property with Mr. Wallis pointing out that some of the property ay lie in the state right-of-way. Mr. Goldsmith 'referred to the landscapeplan and asked Mrs. Emery if she would consider adding two or three cans of Boston Ivy spaced along the fence. Mr. Goldsmith recommended two or three 40 gal. cans of the Boston Ivy. Mrs. Emery.said she had no objections at all. There was discussion of the *fence height with Mr. Wallis stating that the code requires a six foot fence when it abutts residential property. Mrs. Emery said Dairy Queen had indicated -they wanted.a 4 or 5 foot fence. Mir. Wallis said when she applied for the fence permit she would be informed of all the requirements. Mr. Westlin again suggested that Mrs. Emery consider t, -ood landscaping the triangle area of property. MIrs. Emery said she underst that the Edmonds Garden Club might be interested in such areas. Mr. Wallis said he had been in touch with the Garden Club and they would soon be inventor -fo� landscaping. ying areas such as this APPLICATION ;ity of Edmonds for SEDE SEWER PERM6 OUTSIDE (:] INSIDE 9/ REPAIRS F] CARD No . .............. EASEMENT No . ...................................... 6R .7��n ........................ .......... ............................ CONTRACTO ------------------ : ....................................... PERMIT R ......... STREET e7 _;�� ............ .................. . ........... ........................ AVENUE LOT No . ...................................................................... BLOCK No. vo� --------------------------- rE No. -- - I 7 7 NAME ADD . .................................................................................................... ....................................................... 4Q 1� 2 -7 — 'j, Wj �4 76 Date BACIMLL WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................... DEPOSIT, $ ............................................. SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED .... .................................... to F-o e. S�071 c� APPROVED Approved: PR 3-191633 DATE................................................ By .............................. ..... ........ I .................... APPLICATION CARD No. for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PER31IT OUTSIDE INSIDE REPAIRS C] EASEMENT No . ...................................... toy OWNER ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 CONTRACTOR ................ . f.jF .. 6 9-� ................................................... PERMIT No.. Y, ....................... - STREET HOUSENo . .................. ------------ .............. AVENUE LOT No - ----------------------------------------------------------- * ........... BIOCK No . ............................................... 10 7 7 NA14E ADD - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1] P--j HY qo Date BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................... DEPOSIT, $ ............................................. SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ................... ...................... Approved: DATE C7 By ....... //.-. Ivit. X.1'."...... /Jij ................. 9 APPLICATION CARD No . ............................... The City of Edmonds for SEDE SEWER PERNaT OUTSIDE INSIDE REPAIRS C] EASEMENT No . ...................................... toy OWNER -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ......................... CONTRACTOR ................ .. 4--Pj& . ................................................... PERMIT No. STREET HOUSE No - ------------------ 1:1-76-7 --- ------------- ck7p7g:�7 .. .......... AVENUE LOT 'No . ...................................................................... BLOCK No . ................................................ 0 717 �Vj - c/ ? NAME ADD - -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Date BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................... DEPOSIT, $ ................................. SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED .......................................... Approved: EY ..... 1110.41wv.�a ............ No . ..... mcifids. 7 APPLICATION SIDE SEIVER OUTSIDE'[] _' tl INSIDEP;��RE'PAIRS 0 I CAFa ? EASEMENT No . ..................... I., ....... ...... . . ...... ... CONTRACTOR ........ ......................... .................. .............. ------------------------ ............ P E R.'N U T. ----------- 777 STREET . .......... VEI'ME LOT No - ------------- ................................................... BLOCK No. ........ ----------------- . .. ......... ------------- --- -------- -c-71 ?? NAME ADD . ........................................................ ................................................................................................ 7/ 7 41-P Z 17 - 2- '7 - e. S�71 rl 04. APPROVED Date Approved: R 3-1963 '-,'BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED .......... ------------------------- DEPOSIT, ...................................... ...... ..... ... ORDER% ISSUED ............... ............ DATE ............................................... By— ............................ ... -------------- ------------ CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIVIC CENTER ANNEX, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL BY AMENITIES DESI"G-1 BOARD I, (We) tile undersigned, hereby make application to the City of Edmonds for Amenities Design Board approval or modification of a previous ap oval of the accompanying plans for (natur6 of use): PieMy Shop Which plans are attached heret and made a part hereof in accordance with the provisions of. Ordinance The follo,,�iing are pertinent facts viith respect to the proposed deveTopment: 1. Name and address of applicant(s): Robert Armstrong by Ralph* Oppliger, Agent Phone: 784-8008 2. Applicant's interest in property: owner agent for owner( X,) architect ( ) optionor ( ) other ( 3. Name and address of owner(s) ftbert Armstrong 7432 181st Pl SW Edmonds, Wa. 98020 P.hone:-776-4741 4. Location of property: Street Numbar: 22717 Hwy@ 99 Edmonds, Wa. or Common Address: 5. This property is presently zoned: CG 6. Use for which approval is requested is specifically described as follows: Beauty Shop 7. Existing use of property: Vacant 8. If approved, work on project will begin about: ASP 9. Estimated time for completion of work: 3 weeks 10. Date: Attatchments Plan Number 2 I (We) hereby certify to the best of my (our) knowledge, that the . . statements and information contained herein are in all respects true and correct. A p PTATifi t .9 a 100- cl) I �- 5" o I TAbLE -7 0 F-r- I CC 'r—LO5E- T 5 A L A C,00 L E K 4 CASH REGI TER Fpr-,c -ZE-- F'. G BA 7H R 00 M 12-1 13 loiSHWASHEK 14 WhSHTABLE 15 STEO�MTABLEF 16, Rffr-PIG I RATOk F F- I E P, IS OVEN 19 GRILL 0 FAN - 4C�OV 21 OVEN E2 rA 6 L'S LL<i I .1. 0, 7 A F L 0 0 R P L 4-L.- - Ir SCALG DRAWN Alw � q 1-7 FED - 5 I%OJ97 PRAMIT COUNTF2,pp r '65 a qo H 4—H 6 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE H 4 Sizing Criteria (a) Parameters. The parameters for sizing a grease interceptor are hydraulic loading and grease storage capacity, for one or more fixtures. (b) Sizing Formula. The size of the interceptor shall be determined by the Followiny formula: Number of meals Waste flow retention storage per peak hourl x rate2 3 InterceDp POr sPille X time x factor4 = (liquid capacity) I Meals Served at Peak Hour 2 Waste Flow Rate a. With dishwashing machine 6 gallon flow b. Without dishwashing machine 5 gallon flow c. Single service kitchen 2 gallon flow d. Food waste disposer I gallon flow 3 Retention times Commercial kitchen waste Dishwasher 2.5 hours Single service kitchen Single serving 1. 5 hours 4 Storage Factors Fully equipped commercial kitchen 8 hour operation: I 16 hour operation: 2 Single Service Kitchen 24 hour operation: 3 H 5 Effluent Sampling An effluent sampling box on grease interceptors may b I e required by the Administrative Authority. H 6 Abandoned Grease Interceptors Abandoned grease interceptors shall be pumped and filled as required for abandoned sewers and sewage disposal facilities in Section 1119 of the Uniform Plumbing Code. 204 I -if: COUNTER i-- m- --e i c--r=L .:Sb-T I a P-4 -;y J, T C r-) ni --j IT)