22727 HIGHWAY 99.PDF11111111111111
11618
22727 HIGHWAY 99
),-7d�7 mui)-i qq
STREE1411LE RESUL
JUL 2 9 2010 O'f 1) V
qUbWG Iff A
WM
City of Edmonds op MONCr
Traffic impact Analysis Worksheet
RW2( )10 —
Name of Proposed Project: A-C-0, dne,�,4
Owner/Applicant
Applicant Contact Person:
T)/A,, L !F-) f- B4
Name (�J Name
hn eG Lo Lodry �2nlhmC4,::
Street/Mailing A8dress Street/Mailing Address
_E!4�r,�,As C_C��� A
city State Zip City State Zip
Telephone: ?2� r=; .7Sb!a,0 Telephone: _2-C<0, ��Rw,
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable):
Firm Name
Telephone:
THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
Contact Name
E-mail:
Prqiect Traffic Levels Complete
T A-ess than 25 peak -hour trips generated I and 7 on] (Worksheet/Checklist)
y
H. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a. Location - Street address: 2�2_ 113 KM
I __tA�m -4
Attach a vicinity map and site plan.)
b. Specify existing land use: U
c. Specify proposed type and size of development: FALLYEAI�l :77t"-4T�,,--V-Y
(# Of residential units andlor squarefootage of buZzing)
Revised on 6124110 F82 - Trafjic Impact Analysis Work-sheel Page I of 5
0 - 0
d. Date construction will begin and be completed: a C, 15 CS6 V1 QE6 r..4'&4n4A--JJ-
e. Define proposed access locations: :1 k _MA h-VV 1AD
f Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: u
2. TRIP GENERATION
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic I
PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer)
a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour
Trips
IN
OUT
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour
Trips
IN
OUT
c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
ILand Use Daily (ADI) PM Peak -Hour Trips
I IN I OUT
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips:
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Work -sheet Page 2 of 5
3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For
developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require
trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.'
4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements?
b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis:
Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer
Existing Conditions
LOS
Delays
Year of Opening
LOS
Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of
r—L 0 IS
Delays
Land Use
c. Describe channelization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths):
50%
95%
Existing Conditions
Year of Opening
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident hiStory2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
I Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department
2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5
0 0
5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.'
a. Describe existing ADT and peak7hour counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years
after the project has been fully -open (with and without project traffic).
d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS
a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments) must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
LOS
LOS
Existing Conditions
Existing
Delays
Year of Opening
With Project
Without Project
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
With Project
I
I I
Without Project
b. Note any assumptions/variations'to standard analysis default values and justifications: -
1 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet . Page 4 of 5
9
7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic
impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached)
and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations
in ECDC 18.82.130.
kEHANGE IN USE
Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the
previous use was pennitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04),
the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used.
ITE Land Use Category
Per Unit
Fee Rate
New Use
C—t-, 6VI
Prior Use
tA-�-t Ayf'�5.' Al (t,
$
X
X
Units in
square feet,
# of dwelling,
vfp, etc.
-0 GO —
Isfoo
Fee
New Use Fee: $ rior Use ee: $
2 o
LP L
11 NEW DEVELOPMENT
ITE Land Use Category
Per Unit
Fee Rate
FNew Use
$
0 OTHER
Units in
square feet, Fee
# of dwelling,
vD2, etc.
X $
INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+consultant fee) $
TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEEL$
v,-
4:z4&
&Y*'Ed_M_0_n_d;, hngineering Divi S-ion Approval Date
No impact . fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative.
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worb-heet Page 5 of 5
mul
IIcIII%_
04
z
Lj
_7
'Edmo--n,ds--
MOM -.11 ion giltj
-of P5
all
Fii
I— otnul.St-
I sw
12th:S, -IF-
2
zt
if
'A,
T'
01
0 L
A
po
-,j
Euli[l Ji
77 1
F U 7
it
V7
JI,
_0 _1_ I . .
22affi St SW -Ttji22ft St SIN I[—
?r
F If
Wood,w Y�:
lit. 7']
�'7
rf�. equ
I lit=
S d�b'
X anO IF
228th St -SW
-2286st.sw :2
>
y
'104
Y
7-:71
gj
,F]
U IF
hil
Mchtmei*Rd U-1 L
Fftr.
77
i Is, 138(h-StSW;�� C3iifnt ru
919- all in e 40
La e
�17
`2440�-Stt'sw__' 2 L
104
MOP-
P ne
w
MAR
r
E p rance L
IN
C i'o t VeOu'-0b)
43@�n
COE
VT J
11Q,
LJ
p�14W2m
N 00111f
Ji.
z
1E
41
03
L'i
..........
A PLUS ACADEMY
CATI &20��O FOR REFERENCE ONLY 15 22727 HWY 99 #101
EDMONDS WA 98026
May 13, 2009
Jen Machuga
Planner
City of Edmonds
Re: Plan Check No:. BLD20090150
Project: Edmonds Dental Implant Center
Project Address: 22727 Hwy 99 Suite 209
Subject: Response to plan review comments dated April 29, 2009
Dear Jen Machuga:
Please see the parking analysis for the Olympic Financial Center located 22727 Hwy 99. Please
feel free to contact me with any questions.
nk—i, Vi.—i.i r.nt—
Ist Floor
Name of Business
SF
Factor
Required Parking
101
Vacant
1,153
400
2.9
102
Woman's #1
1,120
400
2.8
104
All State Insurance
532
400
1.3
107
Drs. Winkelman & Peacey
584
400
1.5
108
Choice One Realty
585
400
1.5
109
Aurora Chiropractic
1,764
200
8.8
110
is Hongik Acupuncture
1,188
200
5.9
2nd Floor
Name of Business
201
John Park CPA
2,295
400
5.7
204
Hanwoori Construction
623
400
1.6
20S
Vacant
917
400
2.3
206
Vacant
767
400
1.9
07
Vacant
275
400
0.7
Edmonds Dental Clinic
1,200
200
6.0
E209
2 12E
Alternative Counseling
1,171
400
2.9
TOTAL TENANT SPACE
Sincerely,
Benny Kim
14,174 46
Total existing parking 58
— KIM ARCHITECTURE
7415 LAKE BALLINGER WAY EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 96026
— T 206 384 3317 F 425 712 0308 E bkim@kimarchitecture.com
RESUB
MAY 13 2009
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
KEET FILE
PLANNING DATA STMET - FILE'll
New Commercial I Multi -Family Projects
Name: Lze-- UeON�A- C),MC_e,
Date: Uhaloq
Plan Check#: BLD -RC05-0150
SiteAddress:
U
Project Description: 64"
Use(s) Proposed:
Allowed Use: (9) NO)
CUP File Number: NIA
To Allow What Uses: WA
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES /�p
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES ONO
Zoning:
Map Page:
k
Comp Plan Designation: " \P _\n Lz)b-v ccx-c-, g&-_
Corner Lot: 6) NO)
Flag Lot: (YES
ADI3 File Number (date waived): N/A
Lot Area: No Ui2-AQ e
I
Plans Match ADB Approved: (YES / NO)
Sho eline Required:
Critical Areas Determination #: tq1A
El Study Required
11 Waiver
SEPA Determination:
Exempt
El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake
Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form) -
..Setbacks
Street:
Sid
Side:
Rear:
ActualSetbacks
Street.-
Side:
Side:
Rear:
Lot Coverage/FAR Required:
Lot Coverage/FAR Provided:
Lot Coverage/FAR Calculations:
Building Height
Datum Point:
Datum Elevation:
Maximum Height:
Actual Height:
Subdivision:
Lot Aggregation Required.-
Landscapi�g
Landscaping Matches ADI3 Approved -
Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO)
Bond Amount (100% Bid):
0
PlanReviewBy- �_�:157i
PLANNING DATA =FILE
New Commercial I Multi -Family Projects
Commercial P.?f *i,64*Anolywis
Business Name
Type/Use
Parking
Ratio
Tenant
Area
Required
Parking
Total Parking Required,
Total Parking Pro vided-
Mulfi-Fairdly P.4
# Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit
Parking Ratio
Units
Required
Parking
Studio
1.21D.U.
I Bedroom
1.51D.U.
2 Bedrooms
1.8/D.U.
3 + Bedrooms
2.0/D.U.
Total Parking Required.
Total Parking Provided.
OL66
No e;Aer,or- c1vt.,N cv,2,., 'Z�9 �VAC�-'S(A
�r �r vely
Nen-a,�A- ZIPI-r-el �Oj no C)V.�' R__ ? . ('O?aGed _VO
ur,',Jr. I 01-n
Plan Revie
PLANNING DATA
Multi -tenant Building
Business License Information
BUILDING NAME:.(-)L-W.t--tp,c- E1-4,&,r�4C-jQL-
ADB FILEM Ar7-->2,- 1c"P-88
SITE ADDRESS:- Oa-) Q-7 VA16wwp��
Of,>, ZONING:
BUSINESS NAME.
0
SUITE NO. I
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal NonconformingLand Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use: q>K)�-;i c& c.,-;-/
No. Spaces Required: 04�—
X. I I P=iL4
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME: t-� \,j
'0 -%A CL
C:�-' c,,,4a--SUITE NO. I c
USE(S) PROPOSED n4
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Labd Use Determination lssued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: UsezICL. e., , c,-D f o x 3,
nrv,-a %,n No. Spaces Required: Y,4nnj�g
x I 1'*-�o L4 �Q 1% - I
(floor area, # employees, etc.) = ��
BUSINESS NAME:-Tr--3"1,-' V--Ibt-4
SUITE NO. I r) �j
USE(S) PROPOSED:C"; e-, (. :2/ -c)
f ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming t"d'Use Dkermination lssued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use: r-Q- c
No. Spaces Required:
x P:��
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME:
Ok, -7
SUITE NO. I c)
USE(S) PROPOSED:CDLQ6 j c!, !===zZakEg2ZM
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming LiVd—Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP- File:
PARKING: Use:da-ic-9-
No. Spaces Required:Yl4r)o
X 5-7]�R
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME:.
SUITE NO. I o;::�
USE(S). PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination lssued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use%.-NCV�&. 0
Q -, allo. Spaces Required: 74034
X ;k j-<4<(;;�)
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME: C2 h
SUITE NOJ Oct
USE(S) PROPOSE15:-
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:
No. Spaces Required: 4nn �z
x 1-7 to?� -I- N
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
PARKING:
Total Required:
Actual Provided:
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
LVjbrwWPLANDAC-BusLk
PLANNING DATA
Multi -tenant Bu
Business License Information
BUILDING NAME: ADB FILE #:
SITE ADDRESS:—
ZONING:
BUSINESS NAME:eR\r�En?--r-
SUITE NO. r,)O I
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land
Use Determinatk4 Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use.'-
No. Spaces Required:
x
(f]6& area, # employees, etc.) - �Q
BUSINESS NAME: L—LitA,
SUITE NO. QgZ
USE(S) PROPOSED: rj g
p__jCAj ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land
Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use: amaE] Czr/m>��� No. Spaces Require- _4Q2�
X QCJ L4
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME: C—r'7LOe)
0� &') SUITE NO. QQQ
USE(S) PROPOSED: r , �E
e 4c-A L_ ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land
Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:
c_Q/0_, j_gz-�_ No. Spaces Required:
--(floor
X o&��) ,
'4 area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESSNAME:
7 _Fqe-AP_
9'-)C-kA Lge- ;b?rE NO.
USE(S) PROPOSED-: 71�JR�,
CA I —, -T:P ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Lan
se DeterminatioqTsiued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use: C'_Ur'l kc-,
No. Spaces Required: YQn C>
X
(floor area, # employees, etc.) =-/-7
BUSINESS NAME:4
t �_k
e
q SUITE NO. (o
USE(S) PROPOSED.:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land
Use Determination lssued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:OF��-- ic',,e
c9/ CA22Aj>-,(_qac_, No. Spaces Required: T74EEIO
X _-E (, -7 . C?
tS4 (floor area, # employees, etc.) = a N
BUSINESS NAME:
��t4erTc, _SUITENO..a0_7
USE(S) PROPOSEII.r�
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land
Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:cp:
0,ur'= No. Spaces Required:
X_ '5-7�
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
PARKING:
Total Required: _
Actual Provided:
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
LUArvWP1ANDAC_BUSUC
c' �=-1
PLANNING DATA
Multi4enant Bu
Business License Information
BUILDING NAME: ADB FILE #:
SITE ADDRESS:
ZONING:
BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. 00q
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Istued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use: c:�P=(cq C-,)/ nA--?6;T-
- No. Spaces Required: i7a- (I
X-Q1 -7 - CA4
(floor area, #employees, etc.)-= /A
BUSINESS NAME:
SUITENO.
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File -
PARKING: Use:C9F:r-jr-,,q-
0-,L)95r No. Spaces Required:
x
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME:
SUITE NO.-
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:
No. Spaces Required:
x
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME:
—SUITE NO.
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination
Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:
No. Spaces Required:
x
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME:.
SUITE NO._
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination
Issued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:
No. Spaces Required:
x
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
BUSINESS NAME:
SUITE NO..
USE(S) PROPOSED:
ALLOWED?:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination
Istued(Y/N) CUP File:
PARKING: Use:
No. Spaces Required:
x
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
PARKING:
Total Required: 4�
Actual Provided:
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
L�L�PLANDAC-BUSUC
Olympic Financial Building
07-2002
Rm Tenan
S-Q pro- PreyiouE
Base
Rata Balance
Rent
101 Don Standley, CPA
1154 7.84
102.NW Lending Group
1120.4 7.62
0
104 John Kwon
532.57 3.62
0
107 Mortgages Unitd
584.57 3.97
0
108 Vacant
2188 0
0
5 . E5 -. (0
109 Aurora Chriopractic;
'1763.7 11-99
L-+
0
11 Coll
4 1 4 -
201 Robert Fleming MD
1301.41 8.79
0
2 - D. - - --I-
203 Alisa S. Na, CPA
? 994 6.71
D -13
0
LO r-; CCj
204 Eglobesolution
6213 4 4.21
0
205 Bae Muscular
1367-83 9.23
0
fi Zoj
- -7
0
le r-, COj
qnn im &Kim CPA
67.9 5.18
207 Guangxia Magnetic 275: 4.79 0
-T - I
209 WAKorea. Corn 917.04 * 6.19 0
') , g> - e;L f
212 Vacant 1171.83. 0 0
Total 14761.7 80.14 1 $0-00
ELeAdgft Late Balance 108-41
C,bXg-e Due
$0.00 $0.00 Q.0-0-
Jul 02 02 02:16p CARL H. & RYONG BRE OLIVE 425-771-1443 p.4
4 M^Mr-t�-MAI WT11514ANC-5 oeww 6TLIie'ro es 1,-OAKSO
poor
i will prevent track- -,T,, A LOC-47610,11T T146 E�"D
i r6QVtre.p.srlodic WIT. '.01eflow Aemwe cieouwc>
and v.pa note, rA,%oTr=vD 01-ACK WIT" W�41TE L.Wlele!5
.mater 19 3p 1 ed. LAIDEL&O '0919F OrQA�IW* WITH tD'UOTH
"a 1
9 or int. to 0 U .11 N
4-
r.1
81ju
IV 4
-Tor, 947
qj 0 1 ?,jv 644
4U
EB,'X. STReF-T L,1-HT TD
I�e RP-LOGA =0, N 88'47'52"E
14 2.4 V
ME DEPT. 151 MESF P 0
i-tqff
-'C,1/4" k*ja F "e s
HY001ZA44T ^i515
TAPPIW6
X CLOCK
1A
946-
1m
N,
IT! I
Ex /)c 1B 4 "'AT- TO____ 11
G 1 -32
TOP 3544
ITIOW INV. 351.6/, 0 steaf
)m , / P-s'oe-. COWCRET's KP-TAJWIW6 WALL
4 k h-.f ftly,
ciao 3
co Tor' 547-5
EX. C15
1 4 5SI-4
AOJU'51 TO
6: ::;RAIN
1140
1010 Ssls-b
I"'j.
'4
5n &j1TE-'Q\L'-'seQvice To
TOILE-T WOOM
U AkC-A. le'j I C
U-)
.0
A 40 *1 U
In *
�j
2 STORY OFFICE
2
BLDG.
FF
A SITE LIGHTING
.4� (TY P. I ;+
4; Tow am�
s4q.15
co
-5-- r
.'LTTeFz OFZAO�4
8.5
-77
44-0 ---- ------ :
2 C.0
GUARD G" POVC tDgAl�-J LINE
ITS TO
Jul 02 02 02:16p CRRL H. & RYONG BAE OLIVE 425-771-1443 p.3
x1P I- 7�2
A\
PXE,olfl4�
r\
L
Lay -Out of Window Sign
Total Square Footage le
Square Foot per window Number of Window Total Used Sft
. 2.22 .5 11.11
Front Door Sign
0.96 0-96
total used square foot
Available Usage 12.67
13
Wndow
2F 8 Inch
AMIJEL LIM, CPA
Window
2F 8 Inch
-r COA
Window
APPROVED BY PLANN�G
Window
2F 8 Inch
AMUEL LIM, CPA
FF
Window
STREET FILE
6.
7.-
E.
,ADB-02-181
Sign Area and Sign Height:
Existing
Cab et Sin
ELooged Sia
PLVlay
0
Resulting
Sign Area
29.41 sq. ft.
Permitted
AiLn Area
17 sq. 1.
12.41 sq. ft.
30 sq. ft.
sign
Height
Approximately 41
No more than 14' to
to the top of the
the top of the s
siens
NOTE: Attachment 3 provides dimensions for each of the signs in the proposed window
display. Ile total square feet as calculated by the applicant is incorrect. With the dimensions
shown, each window sign measures 2.29 square feet and the door sign measures .96 square
feet for a total of 12-41 square feet for the sign display
Design Review Criteria:
The Design Review Criteria state that all elements of building design shall form an integrated
development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. Signs are included as an element of building
design. All signs are to conform to the general design theme of the building.
The window sign display coordinates wen in form and color with the existing cabinet sign at the
business and the design is appropriate for the building.
SUMMary.: The submitted sign . proposal complies with the allowed sign area for the
office frontage for Samuel Lim, CPA. . Review of the application has deemed it complete.
The addition of the proposed sign display to the business results in a total sJ.gn area that is
less than what is allowed for the business, and the design of the sign display is consistent with
the development of the site. I am administratively approving the Design Review element of
this project subject to the following condition:
1. . The applicant must obtain a building permit for the sign display.
Attachments:
1. Application
2. Photograph of building showing existing signs.
3. Sip layout.
2
L
(.0
0
(L
a)
V)
Lay -Out of Window Sign
Total Square Footage
Square Foot per window Number of Window Total Used Sft
5 12.7
Available Usage -` 13
2F 54 Inch
2
jihNhuare Foot
j
t
t 2F 54 Inch
3.45 Suare Foot
2F 54 Inch
10
— h�e
3.45 Su&e F�bt
APP.&LICANT Copy
2F 54 Inch
10
3.45 Suare Foot
RECEIVED
SEP 0 6 2002
PERMIT COUNTER
2F 54 Inch
3.45 Suare Foot
AMUEL H. LIM
CPA PS CO.
0"
22740 Hwv. 99. Suite B Tel: (425) 673-2720
Edmonds. WA 98026 Fax: (425) 673-1743
e-mail: hslim6O@yahoo.com
APPLICANT COPY
RECEIVED
SEP 0 6 2002
WY OF os—
BUILDING . DEPARTMENT
WORK—
/�PP-ROVED DATE: 7fle9z—
r'3L!)G. OFFICIAL
PSIRPMT MUM.[-.
STREET FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BACKFLOW DEVICE TEST REPORT
NAME OF PREMISES 'Fl )A
SERVICE ADDRESS
LOCATION OF 'DEVICE'
DEVICE:
Manufacturer
LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST
PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE
I RECEI VLzo
NOV 2 21,�89
PUBLIC WORKS
*?-os �,42-0_
Z<�T- Df 'F)WL:b(A&
el Size Seria
_LBS.
LBS.
CHECK�-VALVE NO.
1:
CHECKVALVE NO.
2
DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE, --
INITIAL
1. LEAKED
0
1. LEAKED
0
1. OPENED AT LBS.
TEST
2. CLOSED TIGHT
2. CLOSED�TIGHT
REDUCED PRESSUEE
2. DID NOT OPEN
CLEANED
0
CLEANED
D
CLEANED
REPLACED:
REPLACED:
REPLACED:
DISC --------- El
DISC -----------
11
DISC. UPPER ----------------------
Cl
R
SPRING -----------
0'
SPRING -------
0
DISC.LOWER ----------------------
E
GUIDE
0";
GUIDE --- !7 ---------
11 -
SPRING --------------------------
0
p
--�..PIN RETAINER
11.
PIN RETAINER -----
0
DIAPHRAGM --:LARGE
A
HINGE PIN --- 0
HINGE PIN --------
0
UPPER --------------------------
- 0
I
SEAT -------------
11'
SEAT -------------
11
LOWER ------------------ -------
El
R
DIAPHRAGM ----
11
DIAPHRAGM, --------
0
DIAPHRAGM, SMALL
S
OTHER,bESCRIBE'-L
11
OTHER-,' D�SCRIBE.
El
UPPER -------------------------
0
LOWER ---------------
SPACER, LOWER
OTHER, DESCRIBE
FINAL
OPENED AT LBS
TEST
CLOSED TIGHT -----
CLOSED T-IGHT -----
0
REDUCED PRESSURE
A
81--)-
REMARKS:
*Tz�(l
JHE ABOVE REPORT 18 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE:'
DATE,
INITIAL TM PERFORMED BY %�LF- WOOF- ��ftAF_
OF
VIRED BY DATE. 1.
AL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE
CDK
"CIAL
INC. tENC IATES
4230 � 98th ST S.W. LYNNWOOD, WASH NG'T(--)N 98036 (206) 771-2300
CONFERENCE REPORT
RECEIVED
TO:
Dan Smith, CITY OF EDMONDS
1986
AUG 5
FROM:
Bob Cole, CDA
ENGINEERING
DATE:
August 4, 1986
PROJECT:
EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING
SUBJECT:
WATER METER SIZE
The following statements summarize our telephone conversation on the above date.
1. The I" water wervice as indicated in the letter dated July 18, 1986 provides
domestic water only for the project and does not inicude capacity for landscape
irrigation.
2. Options to provide domestic water service and landscape irrigation include:
a. Install a 11" water service for domestic purposes having a $725.00
installation fee plus monthly charges and install a 3/4" irrigation service
having a $650.00 installation Fee and billed only for volume of water
used.
water service for both domestic and irrigation purposes
b. Install a 1-12
having a $1,150.00 installation fee plus ongoing monthly charges.
3. Bob indicated that option (a) seemed to provide the better value: Dan Smith
concurred.
CDA is proceeding with the project based on the above statements being correct.
Please notify CDA immediately if there are any corrections or additions to this
report.
(A4.-
RDC/sve-030
cc: Carl Pirscher, CDA
Jim Braun, OLYMPIC PROPERTIES
CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGIHTEN
MAYOR
250 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 0 (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
July 18,1986
Robert D. Cole
Commercial Design Associates
4230 - 198th St. S.W.-
Lynnwood, WA. 98036'
SUBJECT: EDMONDS OFFICE BUItDING, CDA 2386
Dear Mr. -Cole:
In response*tb 'your letter of June 12, 1986, the site has both sewer
and water available.
The water line adjacent to the site is as shown on the attached map.
The service required would be I" and the fee would be $725, plus the
street cut, if necessary.
We can find no easements in our files or records.
Sincerely,
I<
ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E.
City Engineer
..RJ/st
Attachment.
PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION
C\ 9
*40
ENGINEERING
STREET FILE
a7
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 -- (206) 771- 3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES
July 16, 1986
Robert D. Cole
Commercial Design Associates, Inc.
4230 - 198th St. S.W.
Lynnwood, WA. 98,036
SUBJECT: WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY FOR
E—DMONDS OFFICE BUILDING, CDA#2386
Dear Mr. Cole:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
In regard to your letter dated July 11, 1986, water and sewer are
avai.lable for the proposed development. The sewer connection will be
in 76 , and the water connection could either be in 76th or Highway 99.
.4
The* cost for a side sewer permit is $55. The cost for a water meter is
either-4650 for a 3/V!*meter or $725 for a V meter. In addition,
there will be a $30 ' right-of-way construction permit required, together
with the costs for road restoration.
You may want to contact the Fire Marshal to inquire if a fire hydrant
will be necessary.
A title company would be your best source for information on any
recorded easement on the subject property.
In addition to the water and sewer, it will be necessary that'the
proposed development anticipate how the storm water will be handled, as
required by City Cede. —
Sincerely,
JERRY HAUTH, P.E., P.L.S.
Hydraulics Engineer
JH/st
Bob Alberts Dt-(� 6nda March Dt
PUBLIC WORKS 0 PLANNING 0 PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING
ILE
V�N
WRCIAL
INC. C IATES
4230 �98th ST S.W LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 (206) 771-2300
RECEIV"D
jut 151986
ENGINEERING
July 11, 1986
Jerry Hauth
Office of the City Engineer
City of Edmonds
505 Bell Street
Edmonds, Washington 98020
SUBJECT: WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY FOR
EDMONDS OFFICE BUILDING, CDA #2386
Edmonds, WAshington
Dear Jerry:
Our firm is in the process of.developing plans for a building in your
jurisdiction. The lenders have requested a written statement from you
concerning water and sewer availability to the site. In addition, please
send the connection costs to these services and any other easements of
record.
The legal description and preliminary site plan are attached.
Si n6erely,
Jgt-ux � - COL
Robert D. Cole
Project Architect
COMMERCIAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
RDC/sve
Enclosures
a.
FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
250 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 * (206) 771-3202 MAYOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES
May 21, 1986
Michael Medina
CDA, In`c.
4230 198th St. S.W.
Lynnwood, WA 98036
RE: 228th ST. S.W. Right -of -Way
Dear Mr. Medina:
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
I have been informed by Chris Beckman, Engineering Coordinator, that
there is some question as to the right-of-way width for 228th St. S.W.,
between Highway 99 and 76th Avenue West, in Edmonds. Further, I also
understand that your firm is working on designing a project north of
this section of right-of-way.
The right-of-way in question is shown as 60' on the City's Official
Street Map, Snohomish County,Assessor's Map, and current Kroll Maps.
It is the City's position that this right-of-way is 60*', unless it can
be clearly demonstrated that the northern 30' of the subject right-of-
way is privately owned. Even if this is the case, it is the staff's
interpretation that, since the Official Street Map shows the right-of-
way as 60', your client would have to dedicate the northern 30' as part
of building permit approval.
You should design your project on the premises that the right-of-way is
60' and that you must setback 15' from the 60' right-of-way. The only
other option available is to amend the Official Street Map to reduce
the right-of-way to 30'.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 771-
3202, ext. 254.
Sin rely,
Duane V. Bowman
Assistant City Planner
PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING
INC
'P�CAL
OCIATES
4230 198th'-T C,W --)(--)E), WN-S-d I ](-7T(--)!' J n 0 0
t), 771
CONFERENCE REPORT
TO: Chris Beckman, CITY OF EDMONDS TRAFFIC ENGINEER
FROM: Michael Medina, CDA bW4VK_ tU40^11
DATE: May 13, 19136 fl
PROJECT: OLYMPIA OFFICE BUILDING
(on Highway 99, 228th St. S.W. and 76th Ave. W.)
SUBJECT: WIDTH OF 228th STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
The following statements summarize our meeting on the above date.
1. The City of Edmonds Official Street Map, Sheet 17, Section 31-32 shows
the existing right-of-way as 30' wide, aligning with the south half of
the 60' right-of-way on the west side of Highway 99 and the east side
of 715th Avenue.
2. Sheet 13 of the Official Street Map shows the right-of-way as 60' wide
but is not dimensioned.
3. The Comprehensive Thoroughfare Plan shows 228th to the west of Highway
99 designated as a collector street but does not continue through the
subject property. There was no designation to the east of the property.
Based on the above information it appears that the City does not own
what would be the north half of the 50' wide 228th Street right-of-way,
and has no plans currently to develop a through -street at that location.
4. Because there are utilities within the existing 30' wide right-of-way,
there is little or no chance that the City will ever relinquish its ownership
over that land.
5. Where a portion of the existing storm sewer encroaches on the southeast
corner of the subject property, the property owner may need to provide
the City with an easement for rights to that one area for maintenance
and access.
6. Duane Bowman of the Planning Department will contact CDA regarding
any findings of fact and conclusions reached during the previous Sizzler
Restaurant proposal for the subject site which may have bearing on our
proposal.
CDA is proceeding with the project based on the above statements being correct.
Please notify CDA immediately if there are any corrections or additions to
this report.
MM/sve-042
cc: Jim Braun, OLYMPIC PROPERTIES
W ul An
In in vi
coo
Inco
C4
C4 V
A A A
C4 C4 C4
Bel
--11A11 43AZOVA/
—51725— �IA,4t�lovg 4-A.,V
/4' A2W-e;Ale
,,Z9
7Z:>
77Z�l
Z !;A,--
00
7Z = 14:57
CA &7r,6c))
ol
(413 z 91. �141 0/
447,
X
47 7-2
4b'7 S
Z-S
C�A
coo
#A FA fA
XX..A
m,"n,
-4.4
IRW
CITY 0 :,T FILE
APPLICRAFIOtT FUR
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
DATE FILE #_AtA3—K/
SITE PLAN X SIGN EXHIBITS )C'
BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS
LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONMENT DATA
FEE RECT #
PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO.. L
HEARING DATE- � � I * �'>�
OWNER/ REPRESENTATI VE 'Jn'& i I-)-( z- PHONE
ADDRESS P724 KIC IJCI*i' *-/Afi, �UIRLDKL i, 0 LA ZIP CODE C1,?0.34--_
< PHONE �)
ARCH I TECT/DESI GNER
ADDRESS i�;��Q 44- N C 1 4'-') k- I (I ('L ij 'A ZIP CODE3_
PROPERTY ADDRESS t,- -n (I ZONING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
1. Building Plans - Preliminary Final. _Site Plan
2.
3.
Landscape Plan Elev�tions
Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan
Modifications of previous approval
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY
I
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL LAV11+1-LJ-'C
APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT li,j f, k (,j i (, 1'6L- C -
ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK
RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENTS: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in
consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and
hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including
reasonable attorney fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action oi
inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished
by the applicant, his agents or employees.
PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its
permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject
property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
APPADB1/PFORMS (Sig�ature of Applicant
, 890 . 199 -
STREET,FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5th AVE N. 9 EDMONDS. WA 98020 * (206) 77 1-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES:
Public Works o Planning o Parks and Recreation 9 Engineering
April 28, 1989
Mr. James Braun
22727 Hwy 99, Suite 205
Edmonds, WA 98020
SUBJECT: BACKFLOW-PREVENTION DEVICE TESTING
Dear Mr. Braun:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
The backflow prevention device in your water supply system is due for
annual testing as required by State Code WAC 248-54-500. Our records
show a total of three (3) devices in your system. Please have the
testing performed by a person holding a certificate of competency as a
crbss connection specialist, issued by the State Department of Social
and Health Services.
If a device fails it's test, please have the necessary repairs made.
Upon completion of a satisfactory test, have the certified tester fill
out the enclosed Test and Maintenance Report and return it to this
office within thirty days.
Additional information relative to this matter may be obtained by
contacting our Cross Connection Control Specialist at 771-3202,
extension 318 or 309.
Sincerely,
oe5,
r� e�c:�-hi Ne' B r e n a
Water/Sewer Supervisor
SH/lk
Cert. No.
Phone No.
Jay Hornbeak
0274
641-0734
Rick Keeman
0296
483LO223
Vince Nardone
0261
776-6200
Ken Rust
0249
652-7840
Harry Shelton
0010
774-0555
Dave Smith
0298
821-1922
Dick Unger
03578
827-4964
Eric Young
0114
451-1594
Pamela Young,
0602
451-1594
Enclosure
BKFLTEST/TXTWATER Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
CITY OF EDMONDS
SjfjEET FILE
ASSET INFORMATION SHEET
E2/N EW
EIADDITION
EIRETIREMENT
ASSET NO.
ADDITION TO ASSET NO.
Z-�/& / /-/
DESCRIPTION
SERIAL NO.
DE Pa.. NO.
LOCATION
"PURCHASE ORDER NO. -
PURCHASE ORDER DATE
16181-ld
B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO.
ESTIMATED LIFE
INITIATED BY
DATE
/t) /
*PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
COST
APPROVED BY
"SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
*SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT
ACCOUNTING ONLY
E(DEPRECIATE
MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT -
G.L. ENTRY
REFERENCE
DATE
is=== --
VERIFIED BY
PROCESSED
BATCH NO. -
INITIAL
t�np
DEPARTMENT FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
P/
NEW
ADDITION
RETIREMENT
ASSET INFORMATION SHEET
. ASSET NO.
ADDITION TO ASSET NO.
z I
V&/
DESCRIPTION
SERIAL NO.
LOCATION
DZEP NO.
"PURCHASE ORDER NO.
PURCHASE ORDER DATE
COST
B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO.
ESTIMATED LIFE
*PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
COST
INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY
"SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
*SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT
ACCOUNTING ONLY
EO/DEPRECIATE
MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT -
G.L. ENTRY.
REFERENCE
DATE
VERIFIED BY
PROCESSED
BATCH NO.
INITIAL
FINANCE
CITY OF EDMONDS EET FILE ASSET INFORMATION SHEET
0 [D/NEW ASSET NO.
1:1 ADDITION ADDITION TO ASSET NO.
F-1 RETIREMENT
DESCRIPTION
SERIAL NO.
LOCATION DEPT 0
"PURCHASE ORDER NO. -
PURCHASE ORDER DATE
COST
B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO.
ESTIMATED LIFE
*PROJECT NUMBER 0=1�7�Z
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
COST j6?/' e7l-�7
INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY
"SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
*SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT
ACCOUNTING ONLY
ET'DEPRECIATE
MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT -
0 G.L. ENTRY
REFERENCE
DATE
VERIFIED BY
PROCESSED
BATCH NO. -
INITIAL
bl-P)
DEPARTMENT FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
ASSET INFORMATION SHEET
I
2/N EW
ADDITION
RETIREMENT
ASSET NO.
ADDITION TO ASSET NO.
DESCRIPTION
SERIAL NO.
LOCATION DEP�/NO.
!�V
"PURCHASE ORDER NO. -
PURCHASE ORDER DATE
COST
*PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
COST
&I-t)ao-
B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO.
ESTIMATED LIFE
INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY
"SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATI ON SHEET W ITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
0
*SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT.
ACCOUNTING ONLY
P"DEPRECIATE
MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
0 G.L.. ENTRY
REFERENCE
DATE
- tv�
VERIFIED BY
PROCESSED
BATCH NO.* -
INITIAL
I,§np
FINANCE
. . . . ..... . . M DS
TR
A
'P U R) 1. 1 C W 0 R.KS D E P A R-T IM E 11 T..�.
B M - 1-1 DEVICI JEST REPORT
NAME OF PREM I SES AEE-dba,04 hct 5-10 e 5- 5
SERVICE ADDRESS . -7.2-
LOCATION OF DEVICE hr._ AIW Cl &A)I-:--k or-
y
DEVICE:
F--�nufacturer Model Size Serial No.
L.INE PRESSURE AT TiME OF LBS.
PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST Clli.CK VALVL
CHECK -VA-L'V'E JJO
INITIAL 1 1 LEAKED
TEST
2. CLOSED TIGHT
LBS.
pRESr
CHECK VfkLVr' 1.10. 2 DIFFERENTIAL .)URE RELIEF VALVE
L3 1. LEAKED IJ 1. OPENED
'2. CLOSFD TI.C-11T. Rf'DUCE0 PRESSURE
2. 010 �-@T OPEN
CLEANED
0
REPLPCED'
DISC ----------- 7-
0
R
SPR I NG -----------
li -
E
CIJ I DE ------------
0
P
PIN RETAINER -----
0
A
H i!�.'GE P I ( -- --------
F1
I
SEAT ---------------
0
R
D I APHRAGI I --------
13
S
OTHER, DESCRIBE
0
F I NAL'
TEST
CLOSE-D TIGHT -----
0
CLEANED
Ci I CLEMED
.REPLACED:
DISC ------------- 0
SPP I NG � ----------- cl
Mill)f — --------- 0
P111 RETAINLR ----- 0
14 [N--'E Pill. — ------ uj
SEAT ------------- [3
1) 1 Allf WAr.11 -------- (3
OTHCR, DESCRIBE- -- 0
REPLACED:
DISC. UPPFR ----------------------
[;ISC. L(.,',..IER ----------------------
SPIMIG ----------- 7 --------------
DIAPHIZAt'll-1, LARGE
U IT E R -------------------------
t0l..;LP --------------------------
DIAPHRAGI-1, SMALL .
UPPER -------------------------
-----------------
SWER, LO'.-!c"R
OTHER, DESCRIBE
OPENED AT LBS.
CLOSED TIGHT ------ 0 REDUCIff-PIRF-5-0�'C
7 r
REMARKS:
-r - �:'A-4:!r- - -4e
rztsa 'N-Nqu-1
0 DALC wA
IC
THEIABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TO BE* YUE.:
INITIAL TEST PERFORMED. BY 0 F D A T E
REPAIRED BY DATE
FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE
L-1
E
-7, 77'
7
CITY OF EDMONDS
STREET FILE ASSET INFORMATION SHEET
12/NEW
ADDITION
RETIREMENT
ASSET NO.
ADDITION TO ASSET NO.
DESCRIPTION
SERIAL NO.
LOCATION �7
D E02�1
f
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
PURCHASE ORDER DATE
COST
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
COST
B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. 0 /51/ ao,
ESTIMATED LIFE
INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY
"SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
*SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT
ACCOUNTING ONLY
2 ZDEPRECIATE
MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
G.L. ENTRY
REFERENCE DATE
kvp) INITIAL
DEPAF,lTM7-N7 FILE
4�& -
VERIFIED By
PROCESSED
BATCH NO.-
CITY OF EDMONDS
12/NEW
ADDITION
RETIREMENT
ASSET INFORMATION SHEET
ASSET NO.
ADDITION TO ASSET NO.
DESCRIPTION
SERIAL NO.
LOCATION -,7
DEPT. NO./
I
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
PURCHASE ORDER DATE
I
COST
*PROJECTNUMBER
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
COST
2162
B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. 1900 01'e7l- &Z74/1 e)L
ESTIMATED LIFE
INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY
"SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
*SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT
ACCOUNTING ONLY
/DEPRECIATE
MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT
G'.L'. ENTRY
REFERENCE
INITIAL
Ltnp
DATE
. e�� -
VERIFIED By
PROCESSED
BATCH NO.
FINANCE
R IZ 0 E i V E D
CITY - of EDMONDS SIDE SEWER P E R M IS
SEP "aw— I V
For Inspection Call 771-3202 s-mtff FILE PERMIT NO.
PUBLIC WORKS
Address of Construction: 9 �z
Property Legal Description (Include all easements): r 71,_
ri, C_ . 3 6 "V. 7 7 4 rl
C 'A < 30 ' '7,4,r 41"
Owner and/or Builder:
7Z
Contractor & License No: 1? e, w �f C-
Single Family Residence
Multi -Family
Commercial
(No. of Units
(No. of fixture Units
Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No X. Yes — (If Yes, Right -of -Way
Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any
excavation.)
Cross other Private Property: No ,<' -Yes — (If Yes, easement required,
attach legal description and county easement number.)
PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK VIA BALLINGER
LIFT STATION
X -7
I certify that I h�ve r�!ad and ' shall comply Date
with the items listed on the back.
C
Permit Fee: Issued By: -DIM
Trunk Charge: �Date Issued:. 4
Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: —14;-Lo
Partial Inspection:
Comments Date Initial
Final Inspection Approved: 2�774_
Date Initial
00
Rejected:
CD —5-a—te Initial
Reason
V)
PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE
Wh.ite Copy - File Green Copy -'Inspector Buff Copy Applican 4�_
Side Sewer Drawing
,The'&City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO . ................... ------------------------
NEW CONSTRUCTION RE13AIRS F-1 LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO . ..................
OWNER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR A.R'�t�,P-k3 ...... ------------------------------------ PERMIT NO. 07177--�-S'
JOB ADDRESS 217-2.77 -------- R) - - ------- 0.5� -------
A
kk\ S -1--b
------ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME OF ADDITION .......... .....................................................................
I I - i Ltl , I
.1 f I
0
To 0
'Co (c C*vJ& 5 D"f
C,7L cAp �kz-j -to 4,r
I Approv :
VIA BALLINGER
UFT STATION I
PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78)
DATE --------------
U
0
U
W
PQ
0
F_
7.
0
W
U
P4
0
"4
CITY OF E
C )MMU I
NJ a EXAM NT
RIGHT -OF V-AFCONESTIRUCTION PERMIT
A. 9 Owner: kaun��
Name
, Z6 2? 18
Mal"d ss
City State
0 Address or Vicinity of Con tion:
Permit No. efZ - -4/ 0 ?
Issue Date Z
*Contractor: VNIVE&SG (bAk
. - ST-,
Nam 4
%.,ddeess
30M_1 7 E(�_ C
:ip State Zip
Z —
A�E— lzr'g;�
State Licensi Number* Telephone Number
Work in Connection With: 11 Sub or Plat El Single Family 11 City Projects
XCornmercial El Multifamily El utility
Pavement Cut: X Y nN
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds
harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may
be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense
of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE
YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final �treet patch is completed
by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
• A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Public Works: 771-3202
• Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion.
• Restoration to be in accordance with City Code.
• Street to be kept clean at all times.
• Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations.
• All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day;
no exceptions.
I understand the above d t t this ermit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times.
Signature: Date:
Owr(e7or Contractor
This Permit Must Be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes
Call DIAL -DIG Prior To Beginning Work
ISSUED BY: PERMIT FEE4��- -19 _,A0
G-101, - a
Time Authorized: Void after S days.
Special Conditions:
Security Deposit:
Receipt No.:_ZK7
Fund I 11
Amendments: Street Cut Dimensions:
X
NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
Eng. Div. July 1985
Dq VST SSBr,,R'� AFAHEY
CITY OF EDMON MAYOR
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - 7110 — 210TH ST. S.W. - EDMONDS, WA 98026
(425) 771-0235 - FAX (425) 744-6057 - E-MAIL: kIein@ci.edrnonds.wa.us
WEB SITE: www.ci.edrnonds.wa.us
January 21, 1999
Attn: Tom A. Bates
Property Manager
WPI Real Estate Services, Inc.
9500 Roosevelt Way NE, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98115
Subject: Water Leak Credit (#5-00457) Address 22727 Hwy 99
1
Dear Mr. Bates:
I have reviewed your account and will allow a credit for the billing period between
August 18, 1998 through February 18, 1999 in accordance with our City policy. The
policy states that the customer will be billed at the retail rate based upon the average water
consumption for the same period during the previous year. In addition, the excess water
lost from the leak will be billed to customer at the City's wholesale rate with a 15%
surcharge added for administrative cost. Only one leak credit will be granted in any three-
year period.
Should you have any additional questions after you receive your new billing, please
contact Denise Burke, Utility Billing Clerk, at 771-0241. �
Sincerely,
Jim Waite
Water/Sewer Supervisor
JW/lk
cc: Denise Burke
Utility Billing Clerk
wordata\waterkred it99\# 5 0045 7
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
INVOICE NO.
CLEAN 'SERVICE COMPANY, INC.
P.O. BOX 49
MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038-0049
PHONE 425-432-8005
FAX 425-432-2405
W.P.I. REAL ESTATE SERVICES
SOLDTO:9500 ROOSEVELT WAY NE
STE 100
SEATTLE, WA 98115
(206) 522-8172
�-age
103961
INVOICE
OLYMPIC FINANCIAL CENTER
SHIP TO:22727 HWY 99
EDMONDS, WA
(206) 522-8172
ACCOUNTNO.
SLES"Ep-
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
SHIP OA
COL
PPD
. DATE SHIPPED
TERMS
INVOICE DATE
PAG
NU PROP
JW
TOM BATES
12/18/98
NET 30
12/21/98
(ITY.
ORDERED
OTY.
SHippED
OTY
SACk
ORDERED
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
DISC
EXTENDED PRICE
830.14
830.14
L2-18-98
EPAIR LEAK IN WATER
SERVICE = $830.14
0
P
PROP
op
C0
COIDE
APPR
AM7,
[ATE
D rE
RECE11
TID
DEC 2 3 tqc;P-
R*
SALE AMOUNT
830.14
Misc., CHARGES
B.
500% SALES'.=
71.39
ml�
901.53
890 - 199-
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works * Planning * Parks and Recreation. e Engineering
February 9, 1994
Tom A. Bates
WU Property Investment, Inc.
9500 Roosevelt Way NE, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98115
SUBJECT: WATER LEAK CREDIT #500457 - 22727 HIGHWAY 99 EDMONDS
Dear Mr. Bates:
LAURA M. HALL
MAYOR
I have reviewed your account and will *allow a credit to this account
according to our City policy: the average consumption for the same
period during the previous year charged at normal customer rates, plus -
the excess usage charged at the City's cost, plus a surcharge of 15%
applied to the excess only. Only one leak credit will be granted in
any three year period.
Should you have any additional questions after you receive your new
billing, please contact Ilene Larson, Utility Billing Clerk.
Sincerely,
01,
Ron
Water/Sewer Supervisor
RH/l k
cc: Ilene Larson
Utility Billing Clerk
#500457/TXTWATER
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
�
�
2/09/94
CITY OF
EDMONDS
UB2011
| 12:28:51
�
PM
Inquire_Customer_History
DETAIL
�
Customer
Key
P
Customer
No.
500457
WU PROPERTY
INVESTMENT
INC
Old No.
00000000
Tran
Description/
Tran
Date
Sry Date
Reading
Type Rate
Cons
Seq
Type
Amount
Balance
02/08/94
001107
2-1 0047
117
000
P
I
100.00-
259.74
334.17
434.17
01/04/0,
01209Ga
k-,& 0059'
117
000
I
9.W
174.,44,3
01/04/94
12/20/93
001107
1-1 0047
117
000
I
164'.95,
1�A-.9�5
| 12/16/93
P
102.28-
11/02/93
10/20/93
000990
2-1 0047
21
000
I
46.62
102.28
11/02/93
10/20/93
000990
1-2 0047
21
000
I
3.03
55.66
� 11/02/93
10/20/93
000990
1-1 0047
21
000
I
52.63
52.63
| 10/12/93
P
102.28-
�
� 09/02/93
08/23/93
000969
2-1 0047
21
000
I
46. 62
102.28
� 09/02/93
08/23/93
000969
1-2 0047
21
000
I
3.03
55.66
09/02/93
08/23/93
000969
1-1 0047
21
000
I
52.63
52.63
Due Date
Total
Current
1
2
3
2/14/94
334.17
.00
334.17
.00
.00
� Cmd2-Dtl/Sum Fill
in required
information
and
press
enter
Cmd6-Cst Rec
�
Cmd4-Cst Sry Help
2_=_CONTINUE__7_=_END
2
Cmd5-Src Add
Cmd8-Notes
04-21 SA
MW KS
IM
II S1
KB
RF
.CEIVED
FEB 0 9 1994
Wu Property Investments, Inc. PuBuc WORKS DEPT
9500 Roosevelt Way NE Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98115
(206) 522-8172
(206) 522-0725 fax
February 8, 1994
City of Edmonds
Ron Holland
200 Dayton St.
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE: Water/Sewer acct. # 500457 for $434.17
Dear Ron,
I am writing to you regarding 22727 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA.
This is a commercial building that I manage, which had a
break in the water main.
Due to this break, the Olympic Financial Center water bill
was extremely high.
I have enclosed invoices to show that there was a break.
If there is any way to have the water bill adjusted down to
the normal amount of use, it would be greatly appreciated.
I have made a payment of $100.00 towards this invoice and
have also included a copy of the invoice. Please call me at
your convenience to let me know how to proceed.
Thank you for your help and time.
Sincerely,
1� 8-� A. -a—
Tom A. Bates
Property Manager
X:\HOME\TOM\WATROLY.doc
RETURN THIS
..City of Edmonds Coni,�,.,.,__
PORTION
BF.. PREPARED FOR THE WINT Li.: *13L_ACDIN� Fly WRAFT
WITH YOUR
F,09'�EP WATER pT %-p � - TAPE IF YOU Lr
.rCs OrZ USING 11-11CAT
PAYMENT
A
YOUrv: HOUSE For", TJAY'5'� SHLIT )OUR WATER OFF T
pREVr--NT SROKEN r'lPE' WRAF:, OUTISII)E.- FPU'4.--%ETS & DRAI
Message
F7-1>,I-U S SuC(.,, As HuSE0 & SPRINKLERS+
71 CURDSIDE RCCYCLE-RS* PLEASE
JUST A REMINDER lk.) - 4
For
C,,Aw f., CONTAINER REM OVI-1 LABELS FROM TIN
Z:
You
FOOD CANS ONLY, DISCAr . CAPS & JAR LILtS IN THE GAF�
0.
DAGE & FLATTEN BOXES. **-xYARl)WASTE: WILL HE PICKED L
IL w__
c:
CC:
0,
% FEBRUARY. roR INFO* CALL
ONCE A MONTH DECEMEEP
U.
SOUND (778-2404) OR LYNNWOOD DISF10.0-AL (779-0198)-
City of Edmonds
L":
,.M�nRRWING§IDATE�
tC FEET
666i
7
- -J�
I, PR FES�W;
W
(p,CUS 11 I
- - IV,
Edmonds Combined Utility.- x: i
II'_- ACCOUNT NUMBER: 990 .11.107
WATER - WASTE WATER (3:
Z. ..:5004!57 10/2`0/93 12/20/9
STORMWATER / DRAINAGE 0:
SERVICE M: SERVICE 22)727 HIGHWAY 5�9
ADDRESS' 4: ADDRESS GODE
Lu
LIJOKaDA-TE D
PAST.Dt)g,
%�- 1/28/94
wT(-.,Hjv..jy 99 AFTER -
I A:-
ACCOUNTNUMBER: t-')00457
PASTOUEAFTER: 1/28/94
AMOUNT DUE: 4.3,1 - 17
R�
1 164*95
2 j 9. 41B
259.74
IMES— 34.17
AMIT. S
WU PROPERTY .33-NC
0500 RODOEVELf ��'NE
SEATTLE WA 98115:m:2252
COMBINED UTILITY: WATER —WASTEWATER —STORMWATERIDRAINAGE
,,--"-DAY
0_11A 775-6464
%A
353-6464 S
364-0959 0
J L
(PLUMBING!'!�,
653-6500 D
Since 1954
T
0
P.O. Box 1021 - 18800 H WY. 99
\/Vater
LYNNWOOD, WA 98046
DAYNIPI 121 C2
ME MBE R
INVOICE
CONTRACT
2 6J72
'jOB LOCATION
Z
I PHONE
DIAGNOSIS RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION OF WORK
QTV.
I' DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
12:,Z
4-f
? 4,
A PROP
J
CQDE
A%
X
L, 77-
ALAT:
D A;
rh:77 �iv Eu
SOURCE DIVISION: MY9 LYC gt5
WATER
PRESSURE
PSI
SUBCONTRACTORS
MATERIAL
ALL WORKMANS�IP AND MATE*�RIALS
EQUIPMENT
LABOR
3AV
GUARANTEED FOR 1 YEAR
PAID BY:
TECHNICIAN
TIME
RATE
AMOUNT
SERVICE CALL
Except: Drain cleaning or work disclaimed on Invoice by Technician
1
7
77
ei
&
FLAT RATE
or as stated on reverse side of this form.
OCK#
El 30 Day Drain Cleaning 0 No Warranty (See reason)
0 cc
_410—
(Warranty work performed during regular business hours.)
0 CASH
WORK AUTHORIZATION:
D.CLIENT
1, the undersigned, am owner/authorized representative/tenantof the above mentioned
0
premises do hereby authorize the above described work and agree to the terms,
()THER
conditions, and have read the lien information, as stated on both sides of this form'.
F ---- 7—
L'Time and Material 0 Flat Rate of $
0 WARRANTY
LABOR
TOTAL
0-1
14
3,<3
6
ORDEREDBY
COMPLETED DATE/?
IN OUT
SIGNATURE (I hereby acknowedge the satisfactory corrpletonot the abov6 desm4bed vmrk.)
X
PLEASE PAY FROM
THIS INVOICE
I
X
.
INVOICE
CONTRACT Ift). 25832
DAY: 775-6464
A353-6464
j 364-0959
653-6500
(PLUMBING�0�,,
Since 1954
P.O. Box 1021 - 18800 HW`Y. 99 \/Vater
LYNNWOOD, WA 98046
DAYNIPI 121 C2 INS! Q4�Llty�
NifmBER
S
0
L
D
T
0
DIAGNOSIS / RECOMMENDATIONS / DESCRIPTION OF WORK
OTY.
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
L �7. J�k&4(_kj�
r
t,
1,
CIC,
tA r Zii I AS 6! M1
-17_eFAa
IT-
P) , :s
J Al x)E Q" Now f--*r'A.,P
-T Cs AE�',,-
Z4
'i
-_':NVc>P 2rr
�A','?
X
Z_
00
t
A
SOURCE e6k__7� L Y C
DIVISION: /I
WATER
R
PRESSU E
A "r- Psi
SUBCONTRACTORS
MATERIAL
7 -71:�
-)C)
ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS
GUARANTEED FOR 1 YEAR
Except: Drain cleaning or work disclaimed on Invoice by Technician
or as stated on reverse side of this form.
El 30 Day Drain Cleaning 0 No Warranty (See reason)
(Warranty work performed during regular business hours.)
EQUIPMENT
LABOR
(00
cc
PAID BY:
0 CK #_
OCC_
0 CASH
0 CLIENT
91 OTHER
A IF T In !��i -C,
TECHNICIAN
TIME
RATE
AMOUNT
SERVICE CALL
4.E
iv%:a
zas, CO
FLAT RATE
V.7 1 C-tL
Z.5'
V'541'L
-7
WORK AUTHORIZATION:
1, the undersigned, arnowner/authorized representative/tenant of the above mentioned
premises do hereby authorize the above described work and agree to the terms,
conditions, and have read the lien information, as stated on both sides of this form.
Arial 0 Flat Rate of $
Time ajLq k1a
IN . OUT OUT
'Zi iR -rn%ro
_)-7
0 WARRANTY
LABOR
TOTAL
ORDERED BY
COMPLETED DATE
SIGNAT er!W vAed�e 4amoFj�lwion of the above descrilbec! work)
PLEASE -PAY FROM
THIS INVOICE
7�n
'Y 9 0 - 199 -
City of Ednon&
Critical Areas Checklist
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on and submit it to the City. The City will
this form is to be filled out by any person review the checklist, make a precursory site
preparing a Development Permit visit, and make a determination of the
Application for the City of Edmondsprior subsequent steps necessary to complete a
to his/her submittal of a development development permit application.
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable
City staff to determine whether any
potential Critical Areas are or may be
present on the subject property. 17he
information needed to complete the
Checklist should be easily available from
observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps,
or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it,
With a signed copy of this form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel
with enough detail that City staff can find
and identify the subject parcel(s). In
addition, the applicant shall, include
other pertinent information (e.g. site
plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in
conjunction with this Cheddist to assist
staff in completing thew preliminary
assessment of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answersprovided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner / Applicant:
Naine
-Z, -7 7Z-7
Strezt Addrew
�2
City, State, ZIP Phone
Signature Date
Applicant Representative:
Nam
Shed Addrew
City, State, ZIP Phone
Signature Date
CA FILE NO.__'�Z
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
�Z -1"7-77 --
1. Site Address/Location: 7
2. Property Tax Account Number:
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? -��yes;
no.
If yes; how is site developed? /55 Z - /- 1, �-
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
,----F-Iat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: _; Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ;Approx. Depth: _
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway V(�2 floodplain X)f�� of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows- across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? 00 Flows are seasonal? ito (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow _; shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wedand is present on site:
R&VOI/0"4
: , ra-
Bos TEsTING& ENGINEERING
July 16t 1986
File No. 05386
Olympic Properties
c/o Commercial Design Associates
4230 198th Street SW
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Attn: Mr. Robert Cole
Reference: Site Geotechnical Study
Proposed Commercial Development
22800 Block of SR99
Edmonds# Washington
Dear Mr. Cole,
We have completed a geotechnical study in the area of a proposed office
building and a future bank branch building at the above site. The
following report summarizes our work to date# and offers opinions and
recommendations pertinent to project design and construction.
We understand that the present development plan calls for a 2 storyl
16,050 square foot office building and a future I story 1,200 square
foot bank branch building. Details pertaining to structural designst
including foundation configuration and loads have not been developed to
our knowledge at the time of this report. We understand that the
respective buildings will be sited as indicated on the CDA provided site
plan dated June 16, 1986, and that the structures will lie at or near
the prevailing surface grade of 350 feet. Site regrading and/or
substantial modification of the low bank bounding the west property line
(SR99) is not indicated.
Authorization for our work was granted by Mr. Jim Braun of Olympic
Properties.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of our study is to assist in project planning and
development by characterizing the soils and general subgrade conditions
within the development area. Based on our findings and the understood
project scope, we will offer opinions and recommendations pertaining to
general site preparation, identification of suitable bearing soilst
foundation system selection, design soil bearing prespurest and
placement of structural fills. In addition, parking area and roadway
pavement considerations will be addressed.
19015 36TH AVE WEST #C, LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 (206) 778-4402
Bos TEsrING& ENGINEERING
16
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16, 1986
Page 2
The scope of our work includes observation of existing site conditions,
a review of the provided site plan, consultation, the performance of a
series of backhoe exploratory pits, soils data reduction and evaluation,
and the preparation of this report.
The development area lies within the site of a vacated miniature golf
facility in the 22800 block of SR99 in Edmonds, Washington. The
property is bounded on the west by SR991 on the east by 76th Avenue
West, on the south by the unimproved alignment of 228th Street
Southwest, and on the north by developed commercial property. The
development area is for the most part flat lying and currently supports
the ruins of a miniature golf course. A prevailing surface grade of
about 350 feet is indicated within the proposed building areas. The
western property line is bounded by a rising embankment which parallels
the shoulder of SR99, and attains a maximum height of about 8 feet near
( . the southwest property corner. Total vertical relief of approximately 4
feet is indicated within the property.
A quantity of artificial fill was encountered in backhoe pit EP-2 and in
two exploratory trenches. The interpreted extent of the fill is shown
on Figure 1, at the end of the report text.
Field Explorations
All depths recorded herein are referenced to existing surface grade.
Elevation control was established by interpolation of the site boundary
and topographic survey data provided by Commercial Design Associates,,
Inc. Exploratory pit locations were determined by compass and tape
measurement from available reference points, and should be considered
accurate only to the degree of the method employed.
Our in -field explorations were performed on June 26, 1986. A total of
five (5) backhoe exploratory pits and two trench excavations were placed
around the proposed building areas. The locations of our explorations
are shown on the accompanying exploratory pit location map, Figure 1.
Pit depths ranged from 4.5 to 14.5 feet below existing grade. All
explorations were monitored by W.L. Bickett engineering geologist.
Records of encountered soil types, conditions, and apparent stratigraphy
were maintained in the field and are suiLunarized on the "Exploratory Pit
Surivaary" sheet (Table 1)# and in the accompanying Exploratory Pit Logs,,
19 all in Appendix A. Samples obtained in the excavations were visually
classified by the geologist in the field.
Bos TEsrING& ENGINEERING
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16F 1986
Page 3
Subsurface conditions at this site have been interpreted through our
site reconnaissance notesp research, and interpretation of our
exploratory pit data. As previously discussedi subgrade conditions
within the site have been modified to some degree by past development.
The nature and detail of the variations in subgrade conditions between
explorations may not become apparent until site preparation activities
are conducted.
The local area soils have been previously mapped as glacially depositedr
Vashon Age material. That is, sediments that were deposited during the
latest advance of glacial ice over the South Snohomish County area, some
12,000 years before present. According to Washington State D.N.R. and
U.S. Geological Survey publications, the local soils are comprised of a
lodgement till with an occasional veneer of less compact ablation till
in some locations. The U.S.G.S. literature indicates the occurance of
advance outwash deposits of Vashon Age near -by to the east. A review of
the Snohomish County Soil Survey shows the local soils map designation
as "Alderwood-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes Alderwood
series soils are characterized as having formed on glacial till
deposits.
Our exploratory findings generally support the previous mapping efforts.
That is, the development area appears to be underlain at depth by denser
glacially derived materials. our exploratory pits encountered a
sequence of dense to very dense, greye siltyl gravelly, fine to medium
sands which contain seams of poorly sorted lodgement till material.
These basal mater ' ials have been termed "glacial drift soils" in the
accompanying exploratory pit logs,, and are interpreted to represent an
interbedded sequence of the local lodgement till and advance outwash
sediments. In the area of pits EP-3r EP-4 and EP-5 the upper elevations
of the drift soils are marked by an increased gravel content. In the
area of pits EP-1 through EP-4 the basal drift soils are overlain by a
stiff to hard, brown to grey, occasionally mottled silt. The silt is
laminated with thin fine sand coatings in pits EP-Ir EP-3 and EP-4, and
appears massive and mottled with remnant root tube structure in EP-2.
6
Bcs TEsTING& ENGINEEPING
4
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16, 1986
Page 4
As previously discussed the southeastern corner of the proposed 2-story
office building site is underlain by an accumulation of artificial fill.
The fill was found to be in a loose to moderately dense condition and is
comprised of intermixed sands and silts. The fill includes an abundance.
of wood debris and organic matter throughout, and is considered to be of
a poor quality. The fill was found to thin toward the north, and
terminates approximately 10 feet inside the southeast building corner
(see figure 1). Elsewhere on the site# minor thicknesses of fill were
encountered. These materials would appear to be associated with
pavement and landscaping improvements for the miniature golf facility.
Ground water seepage was not encountered in our explorations. The silt
stratum encountered in pit EP-2 was found to be saturated below a depth
of about 71.
0 General CONCLUDING OPINIONS
In general, we would conclude that the site should be basically
compatible with proposed development. However, from a geotechnical
standpointr the site does present certain limitations. Due to the
general character of sites that have been developed previouslyt we would
expect that there will be areas where depths to bearing soils will be in
excess of those encountered in our explorations. Examples of ground
modification which would lead to increased depth to bearing could
include, but would not necessarily be limited top'�&dried foundatitons,
concrete slab.s, oil tanks, septic systems, utility trenches, and *
artificial fills used for landscaping. We recommend that such features
be removed a
,4Q _,,r tp 1.1 --building and pavement
with,.p-t jjh�,k
areas. Of primary concern is the uncontrolled tharacter and poor of t�hie
quali,t,NMjh"j._ex.,isting fill soils alon�g#the southeastern portion
z-ster,y-c7rTrVe-rT5i1d1ng. , These materlais could adversely impact
building foundation performance. We suggest that project planning take
into account removal of these materials within the building area
or an
adjustment in building siting away from the filled area. The unuerlying
undisturbed native -glacial drifto and silty soils should provide a good
quality subgrade for support of the anticipated site improvements.
Areas which will support building foundations should be cleared of all
building remnants, uncontrolled fillso topsoils, and root mats down to
firm undisturbed native soils. Building foundations should be founded
on the native site soils, or on structural fill founded on the native
subgrade.
Bos TEsrING& ENGINEERING
0
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16, 1986
Page 5
The dense# native based glacial driftr and overlying stiff to hard silt
soils are considered suitable for support of foundations and structural
fills. The use of shallow spread footings founded on the native
undisturbed subgrade and/or on structural fill founded on the native
soils, should prove suitable for support of the proposed structures. An
allowable design soil bearing capacity of 2000 psf should be 6vailable
for footings founded on appropriately prepared native silts or
structural fill. An increased bearing capacity of 5000 psf may be used
for shallow footings founded on the dense glacial drift (till and/or
advance sands) soils.found at depth. our suggested soil bearing values
use a factor of safety of 2.5 and are based on the following conditions:
1. All footings should be founded on the dense soils at a
minimum ofNL8 ind1hes below finished adjacent grade.
2. All footing excavations should be dressed and thoroughly
compacted. A dense, non -yielding, uniform soil condition
should be established in all footing areas prior to
placement of footing concrete.
3. All footings should be sized according to the anticipated
wall or column loadingsj,, and the above soil bearing values.
Minimum footing widths A"16 and 24 indles are recommended
for all continuous and isolated footings, respectively.
4. All footing excavations should be free of ponded water and
water -loosened soils prior to placement of footing concrete.
Inspection of the footing and floor slab areas should be
performed by the consultant prior to placement of concrete
so as to confirm proper conditioning.
An increase of 1/3' for the recommended bearing capacity may be assumed
to accommodate short-term dynamic.loads.
Ground settlement due to structural loads should be less than one (1)
inch total and 1/2 inch differential for the building areatp. This
portion of the settlement response should occur primarily during
construction. An increased potential for differential settlement shoulc
be anticipated for foundations overlying a cut and fill configuration.
Bos TEsrING& ENGINEERING
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16, 1986
Page 6
During periods of wet weather or in saturated soil conditions, special
measures may be required to facilitate construction. \Interim site
grading should be sloped to prevent ponding and establish a continuing
well -drained condition. It should again be noted that the glacial site
soils are considered moisture sensitiver and may tend to deteriorate if
worked during rainy weather or when in a saturated condition. If
necessary, the use of a covering of crushed roc ' k or pit run gravel over
the footing soils and access routes should aid in minimizing disturbance
and softening of the bearing soils during construction. Delays in
construction activity may result from a deteriorated soil condition.
The consultant should be advised in the event of a deteriorated subgrade
condition. Remedial recommendations could be offered as requested.
The above noted soils should prove suitable'for support of a slab -on -
grade concrete floor system. indications of potential wet ground
conditions are not observed at this site. Howeverl the use of a vapor
barrier overlain by 2 inches of building sand beneath concrete slab -on -
grade could be used as desired to mitigate any undetected problems.
All filling within the building areas, beneath paved surfacesf and below
slabs -on -grade should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by
definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and
standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional.
Structural fill guidelines are established such that a dense, uniform
condition is achieved throughout the entire fill wass. Under these
conditions, the predictability of the fill is such that conventional
design and construction methods can be employed. Structural fill should
consist of a good quality granular soile free of organics and other
deleterious materialt with a maximum size of about 3 inches. If
material is imported for structural fille the fines content (soil finer
than a U.S. No. 200 sieve) should be limited to -less than 5 percent
during wet weather conditions.
L]
Boa� TEsrING& ENGINEERING
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16, 1986
Page 7
The suitability of excavated on -site soils for use in structural fill
depends primarily on the gradation and moisture content of the soil when
it is placed. As the amount of fines (that portion of the soils passing
a No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small
changes in moisture content, and adequate compaction becomes more
difficult to achieve. Soils containing more than about 5 percent fines
cannot consistently be compacted to a denser non -yielding condition when
the water content is greater or less than about 2 percent of optimum.
Most of the site soils possess a high fines content. Consequently,
these.soils should be considered highly moisture sensitive. Maintaining
such soils near the optimum moisture content during wet weather may be
difficult or impractical to achieve.* If rain occurs during fill
placement, the compacted in -place soils should be allowed to dry prior
to additional filling. As is the case for the in -place natural soils,
scarification, drying, and recompaction of the existing fill surface
should be performed prior to additional filling. It may be necessary to
over -excavate and remove wet soils in cases where drying to a
compactible condition is not feasible. Prior to placement of additional
structural fillp the surfaces to receive fill should be cleared of
vegetation, rootst topsoil, or any other deleterious materials down to
firmnative site soils. Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts
not exceeding 8 inches (loose measure) in thickness. Individual lifts
should be compacted such that a dry density of at least 95 percent of
the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557) in the building
areas# and 90 percent in the paved areas is achieved. We recoitimend that
a geotechnical professional or experienced soils technician be present
during placement of the structural fill to observe the work and perform
a representative number of in -place density tests. All compaction
should be accomplished with equipment of a type and size sufficient to
attain the desired degree of compaction.
Preparation of pavement subgrade areas should be accomplished such that
a uniforml non -yielding condition is established, and a minimum relative
compaction of 90% as per ASTM D 1557 is achieved throughout.
0
_B o as TEsrING& ENGINEERING
�71
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16# 1986
Page 8
While frost related subgrade distress is not usually a major problem in
the Puget Sound regiont this may occur locally during particularly
severe winters. owing to a relatively high fines content (soils finer
than a U.S. No. 200 sieve), the site native subgrade soils are expected
to be frost sensitive. To establish a superior pavement subbaser we
recommend that a minimum 6-inch thick lift of clean, free -draining,
pitrun sandy gravelly material be used over the on -site native subgrade
soils to act as a subbase. Such a material will be less susceptible to
frost related distress. We suggest that a pavement section consisting
of a 4 inch (mininium) thick crushed rock base course overlain by 2
inches (minimum) of "Class B" asphaltic concrete be used over the
prepakred pavement area subbase.
The use of a thicker subbase and/or geotextile reinforcement is expected
to be beneficial in reducing local areas of distress in pavements
underlain by uncontrolled fills. These areas may, however, exhibit
broad depressions and other settlement related bahavior over time even
though an improved subbase is used.
We have prepared this report for use by Commercial Design Associates and
their agents for their use in planning and preliminary design of a
portion of this project. The data and report should be provided to
prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but
our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as
a warranty of the subsurface conditions.
Upon completion of the development plans and details, we suggest that we
be retained to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide
written modification or verification where appropriate.
The scope of our work does not include services related to construction
safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct
the contractor's methods, techniquesr sequences or procedures, except as
specifically described in our report ' for consideration in design. There
are possible variations in subsurface conditions.
0
BoT, TEsrING& ENGINEERING
(8
Olympic Properties
File No. 05386
July 16# 1986
Page 9
Within the limitations of scope,, schedule and budget for our work,, we
warrant that our work has been done in accordance with generally
accepted practices followed in this area at the time the report was
prepared. No other warrantyr express or impliedi is made.
We are pleased to have been of service on this project. If you should
have any questions, or require our,services during construction, please
feel free to call on us at any time.
Sincerely,
BOSS TESTING & ENGINEERING
Richard J. Boss
Walter L. Bicket eel 01TH -b%
Geological Services, Inc.
J. Keith Crossr P.E.
T-A^ft 0%;MM
Geotechnical Engineering Consultant To
rx, 0
th
Boss Testing & Engineering 01A.- —dab
(D
76TH AVE. W..
paved parking
EP-5
E P-4
;?
352 explor. trench /
EP-1
354 2 STORY OFFICE BLDG.
10
EP-2
0
o
EP3 ------
ex Aor. t e h
151b
w
0
cr
a.
2
Z.
D
%wo
i�
C/)
C\1
CM
05386 JULY 1986
Exploratory Pit Location BOSS, TESTING & ENGINEERING
FIGURE 1.
lo
APPENDIX A
EXPLORATORY PIT LOGS
(9
L�
L7_�
(0
TABLE I
EXPLORATION PIT DATA SUMMARY
3
4
Exploratory
1
2
Bearing
Ground Water
Exploratory
No.
Pit
Eley, (ft) DeRth
Pit
(ft)
Fill
Depth (ft)
Soils
De-oth (ft)
Seepage
Dei)th I if t-Y
-Pit
EP-1
350
12.0
trace
0.5 (0.7)
none
EP-2
350
14.5
6.3'
6.3 (10-0)
7.0
EP-3
351
12.0
none
0.5 (3.7)
none
EP-4
350
4.5
trace
0.5 (3.0)
none
EP-5
350
9.0
1.61
1.6 (3.0)
none
1) All depths are referenced to existing site grade.
2) Fill depths refer to uncontrolled fill soils and may
include intermixed or modified native ground at same
locations.
3) Bearing soil depths in parentheses refer to increased
bearing capacity soils.
4) Silts become saturated in EP-2 beyond about 71.
05386 July 1986
Edmonds office Building
. (0
EXPLORATORY PIT LOGS
EP-1 Elevation 3501
0.01 - 3.0" Asphaltic concrete over dense pitrun gravel base.
3.00 - 0.71 Very stiffe brownt very fine sandy siltt damp,
laminatedt unit thins toward east end of pit.
0.7' - 12.01 Very dense to dense, greyo siltyr gravelly fine to
medium sand, damp,, poorly sorted, very sandy till -like
texture in zones, gravels to 4" typical, glacial drift
soils.
T.D. @ 12.0'r 6-27-86.
EP-2 Elevation
3500
0.01 - 2.71
Medium dense, tan brown, gravelly, siltyl sandy
Artificial Fill, damp.
2.71 - 4.7'
Loose to medium dense, dark brown, gravelly# fine sandy
silty Artificial Fillr damp to moisto abundant wood
debris and organic matter in pockets, scattered debris
throughoutj odor of decaying organic matter.
4.71 - 6.31
Medium dense, grey brown, gravelly silty sand, fine
rootse oxidization of root tubes and gravel coatings#
some fine charcoal fragments# �odified Native
Ground (?).
6.31 - 10.01
Stiff, grey mottled siltr wet to saturated beyond about
7.01, fine roots and occasional root tubes, native
soils.
10.01 - 14.51
Densep grey and brown mottled# siltyp gravelly fine to
medium sand, wet, poorly sorted till -like texturej
glacial drift soils.
T.D. @ 14.51, 6-27-86.
05386 July 1986
EPL-1
,1' (6
10
Ckv
EXPLORATORY PIT LOGS
(Continued)
EP-3 Elevation 3511
0.01 - 3.71 Hard, grey brown, mottled, very fine sandy silt,
danip, laminated, thin fine sand coatings -on beading.
Lens of glacial drift soil @ 1.21 - 1.9'.
3.71 - 5.0' Dense, grey brown, slightly silty, sandy gravel, danip.
5.01 - 9.5' Very dense, grey, silty gravelly, fine to medium sand,
damp, lodgement till -sandy matrix, glacial drift
materials.
9.51 - 12.01 Denser greyl slightly silty gravelly advance sand,
damp, occasional till seams, glacial drift soils.
T.D. @ 12.01t 6-27-86.
EP-4 Elevation 3501
0.0 - 2.0" Asphaltic concrete over dense pitrun gravel base.
2.00 - 4.01 Hard and dense, interbedded grey and brown, laminated
silt and brown micaceous fine sand, damp.
Silt fraction predominant 01 - 21, fine
Sand fraction predominant 21 - 4'.
4.01 - 4.51 Denser grey brown, slightly silty gravelly sand to
sandy gravelt damp, glacial drift soils.
T.D. @ 4.5'r 6-27-86.
05386 July 1986
EPL-2
As
(0
EXPLORATORY PIT LOGS
(Continued)
EP-5 Elevation 3501
0.01 - 1.61 Loose to medium denser greyr gravelly# silty,
sandy tifiCiAj_jjUj dry to damp.
1.61 - 6.0' Medium dense to dense, grey brown to grey, medium sand
gravel to gravelly sandl dampt cobbles to 12", native
ground moraine soils, root penetration to 3.0'r nature
weathering horizon in tact.
6.0' - 8.0' Very denser greyr gravelly silty fine to medium sand,
dampt poorly sorted glacial till soils - sandy matrix.
8.01 - 9.01 Very denser greyr slightly siltYr gravelly, fine to
medium sand, dampt seams of glacial till soils-
T.D. @ 9.01, 6-27-86.
05386
EPL-3
July 198P
96 � /sv
/ P07,/ D"I'l -IV r,--- , ,
,7447 vt11z-c.-
14� =
Cr- e--
4�1- =
7Z
dn,,c� X-,'1,-9,l1J72nV4A4-C-6, 4
_Z�,teo�-6L5 7Z:>
7Z::)
, Z 5A�-- - , Z5,
, BC 4& 119
4- (-64N� - -7.5
�25
(,-7 -S)
1��) C-2
-7-1
Zo 7-2
-L, Z!574
7
4 9 7. C>
Ice,
Gu e-
7)41�5
4"; t
41 FW14,47
lu W LU
X x 11
. V, vi
coo
An 0 0
C4
C4 C4 C4
C4 C-4 C4
0
0
Z-
96113
FUTURE BANK ALTERNATE_
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30
TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WM., IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. I (SR - 99);
EXCEPT THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; AND
EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD.
NOTE'
EXISTING ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN ON THIS DRAWIN(
(PARKING LOT, CONCRETE SLABS, BUILDINGS, ETC.)
To
1v, -4, ? V7 eq
a?
IST $.3:
L-144,
t4l,
24
I i �ri L
DRAINAGE
TRAFFIC
WATER
SEWER
STREETS (L - -Z
PLANNING
''VICINITY MAIO
TEMPO K*-ARY COK15TRUCTIOW ENTRANce
( tOL-AC-FE V. V. H. 0 T. (=0AWSe A&&1Ce<9A'T1E Wo. I (Z 0 - -all GTOW
OR eQUAU, W611=F-te TO W-'5-n0-T- AEiTO.'510eC. ANIO
,q - 03.41 (1)), AT F-D&E- OF7 exismwa A-5PHALT (BO'LONCv.
28'W106 ANO G" -moICAL -2 F-"-MAWCee�
Tr=MP0VZA1QV WWGTRUC-r10W ENTIZAWCE MAIWTIEJ�.JAWCF,
The entrance shall be maintained in a condition which will prevent track-
ing or flow of mud onto public rights -of -way. This may require periodic
top dressing with 2-inch stone, as condition4 demand, and repair and/or
cleanout of any structures used to trap sediment. All materials spilled,
dropped, washed, or ti�acked from vehicles onta roadways or into storm
drains must be removed irmnediately.
P?V,0VI0E Te--- FOR
L-A�40ev--A?Oe 112RIGATIOW
WAZTER'�EP, ICE Fre0KA
EX. IZ" WAT�1:;Z MAi�4
/ I /
NOT FIELD LOCATED
INV. 346.00 (CITY PLAN)
APPROV60 F=09Z
CoweiTle(JCTION CITY OF GOMOf-40e
&—&-w I I a — . '
r->'?VT E
1.4
0W"F-)e/t:)eVeLjOPeR
JAME-5 0KZAUW
1400 - 1&4TW 5TP-EET OW
LYNWWO00, WA Lr-M305G
10HONE: -74Z-7600
EX.
IWLET
T0)4�1
INV.
o---o
EX CeMH
E X 115T, T'�l C7
r-up-ts UT
> WEw r- I:;Zt5 Cull
U I
z W
W
0
U 3
U I
< __j
U <
x
o:: Cl-
LU (n 2 Z
> <
Cz
LLJ
LU
Ln
UJI 10*
0
z
U
0
C-
-0 0
Ckf
:z
W6W CU 13 CUT
S.S. MH,
TOP 346.32
INV 338,62
ex.6EWEReeW'VICF- Lo
iaTA. t+j5?-:t FrZom MH
& Zoe,-rH 6T-. -,W AW 0
767H A\/ 6 - W.
1 -1 H.
W L C.B. M
1 11 - I
/ OP 34Y.4/
T'T'
INV 341.12-12"S
INV 341.02-18"W
-T')PE I[ - 54" OIA- I N V 3 41.0 71j 18" E
PP
ToI,0 '34E5.5 \0
0%
S.S. MH. (DROP FROM WEST)
TOP 34952'--
VL 71
30 29 INV. 343.50 W (CITY PLAN)
INV 336.10
131J32
50
8" S.S.
TOP
I"V
1WV 4'5.CIO- W
EDMONDS OFFIqE BUILDING
V RECEIVED
~rREET FILE FOR
NOV 24 '1986
ENGINEERING
JAMES B R A U
IN SE 1/4, SECTION 30, T 27 N., RA E., W M.
EDMONDS
7 r?,45.9,rl
SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASH I N GTO N
111,56
DATUM
/Ep-ail-
I
PER 1:�)J�QAIWA&E CALCI.
IeFEVIS101-4e�
CITY OF EDMONDS (M.L. L. W.)
13
jo
L
fth L ovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc.
BENCH MARK
s
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS PLANNERS
INV S.S. MH. LOCATED 13.5' S. & 15'E
23106 100TH AVE. W.
EDMONDS WA. 98020 PHONE 775-1591
OF INT. 76th AVE. W & 228th ST S.W
ELEV 336.10'
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
F,S.
SCALE FILE NO.
'3 PEI�� C IT'Y OF EOMO�-.105
10-10-66 7VC-
Y G A
I K05J
1 17 - ?IE:1 - ocv 1
236
1 1" = 20' 1 1502 A
0 -Tv<�"
96113
V-0" mh I'-e-il
Vorlobis ftioblo V*ioble
varicitAt
12 Mox. 0.02!111
IL�
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3/8' x 4' *xp. JoInt
SECTtON A -A
CURB RAMPS
c-�CWTI WU& CUI:;?O -
KAu57 r3G ioour�,,Eto
11,4 PLA�C6.---
A - - \" --
-1 A
0TI
4 9
QUAKI�ZY el -ALL, eACKFI LL
M1 r4.
ROCKERY DETAIL
Poc-V L� I N G
LA"F- FOOS
VAK'14,151-6 OEPTH
Concrete
'Valley Gaiier
M A X.
;2p-
AA
AA 5AWCUT EXI15T.
SHOULDEe P 240
No OLIZ)o At Daeo Of
whool Chatr namp <
..XX
cow ceelE'-
OV6WLAV
a A I "27T I W 6. A. C..P
4j
P-XT�?UtDeb cu�e6 c*�
16' �?AOI U!5 KAAX
Zzcurb Ot GuttOr.
SIPE7WALK / GUTT
eXPANSION JOINTS 20'O.C.
PUMMY JOINTS 10'0.C.
tTWO WA/ L-EF=T TUIR" LAt-4e
50' Minirnum VA K�> I E 15
V2' 401
51 1 14' Desir 65'
CONCRETE CURB,
GUTTER &
SJDEWALK (TYP)
W,
vr\
FILTF-R FAIDRIC -
MIKAFI 140 OR
WUAL.
r'n pekf= PVC
4
I/Zl 5'
1.e� SHY
0 027 t
GXP5TIW(5�!5H0UL-0E-1Q
PAVEMeWT
66CTION 'A-A'-
W.T.e.
Materials
(1) Size.categories shall include:
Two -man rocks (300 to 600 pounds), 13" in least dimension;
Three-man rocks (800 to 1200 pounds), 16" in least di-
mension; and
Four -man rocks (1500 to 2200 pounds) . 18" in least di-
mension.
Four -man rocks shall be used for bottom course roc� in all
rock retaining walls over 6' In height.
(2) The rock material shall be as nearly rectangular as possible.
No stone shall be used which does not extend through the
wall. The rock material shall be hard, sound, durable and
free from weathered portions, seems. cricka., other defects.
The rock density shall be a minimum of i6_0 pounds per cubic
foot.
The retaining wall shall be started by excava�fng a trench, not
less than six (6) inches or more than one (1) fo ' ot in depth below
subgrade in excavation sections or below the existing ground
level in embankment sections.
Rock selection and placement shall be such that there will be
minimum voids and, In the exposed face of the vall, no open voi4s
over six (6) Inches across in any direction. The final course
shall have a continuous appearance and be pl�ced to minimize erosion
of the backfill material. The larger rocks ail -all be placed at the
base of the rockery so that the wall will be stable and have a
stable appearance. The rocks shall be placed in a manner such
that longitudinal axis of the rock shall be at right angles or perpen-
dicular to the rockery face. The rocks shall have all Inclining
faces sloping to the backof the rockery . Bich course of rocks
shall be seated as tightly and evenly as posilble on the course
beneath. After setting each course of rock, all voids between
the rocks shall be chinked on the back with t,�uarry rock to eli-
minate any void sufficient to pass a 2-inch �r��jnre probe.
The wall backfill shall consist of quarry spalls with a maximum
size of four (4) Inches and a minimum size of two (2) inches.
Thisma terIal shall be placed toan eight (8 )-inch minimum
thickness between the entire wall and the cut or fill material.
The backfill material shall be placed In lifts to an elevation
approximately six (6) Inches below the top of each course of
rocks as they are placed, until the uppermost course Is placed,
Any backf Ill material on the bearing surface of one rock course
shall be removed before setting the next coure�,---
When a sidewalk Is to be built over a rock retaining wall, the
top of the wall shall be sealed and leveled with a cap constructed
of cement concrete, Class "C" in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Section 6-02 of the Standard Spccifications, but
with reduced water content resulting In SlUmpof not over two
(2) inches.
L ID, OL YNPIC FAYNOR Y NO. -.f435A,
Off&T 1YHfRZ: 0AeN11YO IJ D19fC7-
Ly oym LADDER 0 Rfim1crox
/0 VASIBL f 0 ON&&D&A 09 ORA rf
IIN17, P A0? Of 6.4A 7f ft. -'-3 4 0. 5
C#AIN, ZVOLB CAP,407Y,
JIACK W.Vff e4rEl P
SL 10t IS DOWN. ANV
lVfLDED A0 FRAMe
241 Jr41YDAA0 OAL V LADOfg,
L I FT <5.ATG Clr-1 I AIIN J7'fPJ (TY?IC14L)
L6 -08, C.45CADE
C,ULVeR7, INC. 5G I C; MIO (0 0, E) olo
14 6AGG
GO)<S�UC7AT
1 mv. '3
TZI
C&7N0ff - 5V' 01A.
ftY /2 6AV6,t PIATE q
W&D roemp CRO5.5 NVTf:.4Z1 Jrtti r.4RTJAN,0
011ZIFICE TO OC- C)' A&IJ74e 441.NN-
SH,4RP F-06E 1Zf0.4#,0 COA7tV W1XXP11AjT
SHOP ORI LLEID. (,r9V7h1f1Y7 0 OR &774R.
C A 7C /Y B 115 IN IYO. I
RtSTR /C TO_ fir IL
NIrly
PE0&15T)QIAW
HAW01eAlL.
?4�O C- K I- K> Y
2 5T0)1Z'>1 0F=F=ICE
OUILOIN6,
FF- �5E->O
/-----eX7)eUtDED CUIeIB
e"COMPACTIE10 OEPTH
CL,ASS 'a A5PHALT
4"COMIOACTE-D OEPTH
C,K�U�5HEtD ROCK
PARKIW6 LOT 5&CT10FQ
Tr=MP0jeA1eY GIW510W C.,OWT1420L NOTIE5_
1. ALL LIMITS OF CLEARING AND AREAS OF VEGETATION PRESERVATION AS PRESCRIBED
ON THE PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD AND OBSERVED DURING CON-
STRUCTION.
2. ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENTATION/EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED
AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND CLEARING AND/OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE
THAT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ALL
EROSION AND SEDIMENT FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CON-
DITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND
POTENTIAL FOR ONSITE EROSION HAS PASSED. THE IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE,
REPLACEMENT AND ADDITIONS TO EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL
BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE.
3. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON THIS DRAWING ARE
INTENDED TO BE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO MEET ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS.
AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE,
THE PERMITTEE SHOULD ANTICIPATE THAT MORE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
FACILITIES WILL BE NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE
PROPOSED SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE THE OBLI-
GATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS
THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES,
OVER AND, ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO -PROTECT ADJACENT
PROPERTIES AND WATER QUALITY OF THE RECEIVING DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR. EROSION/ S EDI MENTAT ION CONTROL ONLY. IT
DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, SIZE NOR LOCA-
TION OF PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS OR RETENTION FACILITIES.
5. IN ANY AREA WHICH HASBEEN STRIPPED OF VEGETATION AND WHERE NO FURTHER
WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR MORE, ALL DISTURBED AREAS
MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH MULCHING, GRASS PLANTING OR OTHER AP-
PROVED EROSION CONTROL TREATMENT APPLICABLE TO THE TIME OF YEAR IN (1)1UES-
TION. GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY DURING THE MONTHS OF
APR`I-L THROUGH SEPTEMBER INCLUSIVE, SEEDING MAY PROCEED, HOWEVER, WHENL,vt,(�
IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PERMITTEE, BUT MUST BE AUGMENTED WITH MULCHING,
NETTING, OR OTHER TREATMENT APPROVED BYK ING COUNTY SURFACE WATERMANAGE'-
MENT, OUTSIDE THE SPECIFIED TIME PERIOD.
6. FOR ALL EROS IONI SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PONDS WHERE THE DEAD STORAGE- DEPTH
EXCEEDS 6 INCHES, A FENCE, A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET HIGH, IS REQUIRED.
GENERAL NOTES
1.
LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE
APPROXIMATE ONLY AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION(S) OF ALL UTIL-
ITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE.
2.
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICA-
TIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" AND STANDARD
PLANS AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS, AND ANY REQUIRE-
MENTS ESTABLISHED AT CITY HEARINGS ON THIS PLAT.
3.
ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION BY THE CITY
OF EDMONDS AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS
SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT INSPECTION PRIOR TO
AND DURING THE WORK.
4-
ALL WORK WITHIN THE PLAT AND CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
5.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL
PERMITS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION.
6.
PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION COLLECTION
FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER
THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN
OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRADING, AND SATISFACTORILY
MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE POTENTIAL
OF ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED.
7.
ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CORRUGATED METAL 16 GA.
GALVANIZED
AND ASPHALT COATED TREATMENT I OR BETTER,
CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE, 16 GA. OR PVC.
8.1
SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6" PVC-SDR35-ASTM SPEC. D3034
MATERIAL OR CONCRETE ASTM C-14 CLASS 3, RUBBER GASKET.
9.
SIDE SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. NATIVE
MATERIAL CAN BE USED FOR BACKFILL PROVIDED SHARP ROCKS ARE
KEPT OFF THE PIPE DURING THE BACKFILL PROCESS.
10.
ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WATERMAINS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY
THE CITY OF EDMONDS WATER DEPARTMENT. SERVICE REQUIREMENT . S eY.CCf:rr
TO BE ARRANGED FOR PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION THROUGH
WATER DEPARTMENT CUSTOMER SERVICE SECTION (TEL.: 775-2525).
11.
ROAD RESTORATION SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS.
12.
ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
NOTES AND DETAILS
FOR
JAMES BRAUINI
SE 'A, SECTION 30, T 27 N., R. 4 E., WM.
EDMONDSI WASHINGTON
0l
"A
CITY OF e0l�,AOW05 10-10-13& T\IC-
&UARtD )�?Al L )OE-
Lovell- Sauerland & Associates, Inc._
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
23106 100TH AVE. W. EDMONDS WA. 98020 PHONE 775-1591
DRAWN CHECKED DATE F.D. SCALE r�ILE NO,
TVC I<Z151j "-T115. 1502 A
t5 J I LIP I Ilk -IT
X�g 14
H CC, Z// N' L
CJ N E. R
F�&W E�: L t�
4-"
Vll�-tAr_-f a-- t�;�V
L�( LJ t
Y,
0
C.N
L
swf
<r
ly
,;drate
L OOD
00
ST
19600
L Scrober.'.
Si -, � L'
tool
NW
community
S�ofltqt : "
1,�� I t J F--1
f 4
5%
:FUTURE BRANCH 6
:SHANK 8L
too SO. -Pt.
- - -----------
P `A.� I
P4, 1 Al
> 9 DR VE AREAS T,
J
P K
A LU
>
0)
2 S DAY gFICE::
T
T LO
a D510 SO. FT.
4
00
L
------------- ---
-4
MHIBIT "A"
Legal Description of at 22727 Highway 99, Ednonds, wasbingsTREET 'MLES
All that portion of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying Easterly of State
RDad 1, excluding County Road and excluding North 75 feet
thereof in Section 30, Township 27, Range 4ER4, in Snohomish
County, Washington State**
-re.4ei t-�4- P-� r-- 'a--rt'j- I (�4,-k2f S4 6rNA fo er,_t,4_r 4zr
REL k. IVIED
OCT 12 1988
PLAM"IG DEPT.,
��,\Cx� -
96113
'IrM L A to!!�%.J %,o- -r-1 eik I i-r t#!2 A L I.,e-
EX.
IWLET
TO?dl 54J5.&?5
INV.
D-0
EX. ct5mH
( IlIZILAC-S V. t:;0 H - 0 T. COAMSe A&&VZe49A-rE Wo - 1 (2 Ill - v 9-row e)
OR eQUAL, leePF-Ve TO W.B%nO.T. STO. -5110eC. 9-115.16621) AWn (_x,
q - OB.,q (1)), AT F-D&F- OF:' eXI STI "65 A15PHAL-T (50' LZ>NCv,
26'W1106 ANC> G" nSF_V'=)) - 7YI01CAL -2 F_"-TMA"CeE, S.S. MH.
TEEM100tZAIRY C.0�J6TRLR,-T10W eN-rP.AWCE MA1WTEj4AWCF,. TOP 346.32'
The entrance shall be maintained in a condition which will prevent track- INV. 338.62
ing or flow of mud ono public rights -of -way. This may require periodic 40 W
top dressing with2-i ich stone, as conditions demand, and repair and/or
All materials spilled,
cleanout of any strucures used to trap sediment.
dropped, washed, or t,acked from vehicles onto roadways or into storm IV 2
drains must be removei immediately.
:2
C, le� >
'Top CY-
X
403 1 t'jv- W
'D STREET LIGHT
N 88047'52" E
142.41'
0\
0\ FUTURE BRANCH BANK 0
BUILDING U-i
>
CO
-3 4 6.
z
<
LU
k
z
11 ex 14 ca 0
+ 3
LO
TOP 354.4
W 3511.6
0�pl <
U <
�7_ 1:
V)
I Z
LLJ
C1504 >
5/G T010 i54
C\ e)(. C 15 1 co
I C-0. H-d1d. �544. 17 Cl)
0\ OWA 00 LLj
W/'-50ul L, i0IQAI"
Top . 5 exe C14 >>
114 V. 4.0 <
C 3: __j
'0 1 LIJ
FUTURE BANK ALTERNATE C 17 ULJ
F_
-Top F�Ia.
Ex.'apweR
'0:
ov U sTA, � + 50 d: Fl�?OM MH
z -rH 5T. 15V,)
0 z �4 0
>
0 ?&TH A\JE W.
r ........
10
01-)
U
01 0
—C
00 co ck�
Top �541a� '10
CL
0
> Cie) _4117 60 1 C) <
40
<
0*
4Y 1411f.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 STORY OFFICE
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
BLDG.
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30 0TUI5
FF: -t5'&O-0 ><
0 U
TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WM., IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, J 0
I
WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (SR - 99); 1 / /
0
TOP ?�45
EXCEPT THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF; AND WATF-Y� el*N)ICE PkOM
C-x. I -ell �WAT`E_-R MAI V--1 SITE LIGHTING IWV
EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD. (TY P.), +
TRASH ENCLOSUR
NOTE 0
A
'K7 0 T
EXISTING ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING 4,
(PARKING LOT, CONCRETE SLABS, BUILDINGS, ETC.)
0
7
+
/ 1 (0 9 C.B. MH.
b I CONC. STS -J D
TOP 34947
INV 341.12-12"S
INV 341 -18"W
.02
SO, CO�AC. STREET LIGHT C hg� INV 341.07,-118" E
BASE Pe I[ - PP
N V / W, a � e'T R I C T 0 e 0
op '34e.5 Z� 0\0
il�4v. S.S. MH. (DROP FROM WEST)
TOP 349 52
0129 INV. 343.50 W (CITY PLAN)
13
IINV. 336.10-
270.39'
211,TH A 0 1 3 32
1� ST k N 88o48' 30" E
216TH
2 17 NS,
7_7 13
217, S �—w
< 2187H ST
mrm 10"SIP
218TH ST 5% Uj
>
T'11 8" S.S.
LO�H S1 SW Z 220Ti ST
I Of
?% . r_�- L
>
8" S.S.
Sw
F" 2M 221S u0sp 22111�'_14
'j2t4QT PL Sv, 2j 1 ST'��S*
r
TOP 34a-10
>
LK N V
> S. S. M H.
I WV 54S.4`10- W
2j25T;71� f��F 225TH S
-2-, 228th STREE T S-W
H X� �'6i'� 2 1� ,I. P� NOT FIELD LOCAIED
5 r (CITY PLAN)
2 L
>P
"T'
2 �16
P L _L28TH �T INV. .346.00
-340 j1;T
'I�f PL Sw :,?IT ST EDMONDS OFFIqE BUILDING
11 229TH. ST 'r#� 229TH 5,1,/
L PL
4
T r
f,T
ST S.
FOR
> N
31 fAll
Si b, 99 is
4z j S�r'
P" 'ST
JAMES rt3RAUN
S -CIL
IN SE 1/4, SECTION 30, T 27 N., R. 4E., W. M.
AV
24�ND 1�� S1 SW IM
PL S.
EDMONDS
SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON
VICINITY MAVO
DATUM
CITY OF EDMONDS (M.L.L.W)
Lovell - Sauerl and & Associates, In-c.
BENCH MARK
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 0 PLANNERS
INV S.S. MH. LOCATED 13.5' S. & 15'E
23106 100TH AVE. W. EDMONDS WA. 98020 PHONE 775-1591
OF INT. 76th AVE. W & 228th ST S-W
DRAWN CHECKED DATE F B. SCALE FILE NO.
ELEV 336.10'
Y G A R!5j '7 - ?E�, fNz7 236 1" = 20 86 —1502
I
15HSC-T I OF 0
q T T P P I A KI /ir--,
1"-200-011
;R 675
FMIMI
LW-0