22730 HIGHWAY 99 (2).pdfW
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEETING
10W
June 19,1996
The June 19, 1996 meeting of the Architectural Design Board was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Oaklief at the
Community Services Building Conference Room, 250th Fifth Avenue North, Echnonds.
1. ROLL CALL
Present Abse Staff
Jeff Oaklief Alan Bylsma John Bissell, Associate Planner
Linda Goodrick Craig Pierce Karin Noyes, Recorder
James Young Steve Sullivan
Shirley Frank
2. CORRESPONDENCE/COADIENTS-FROM STAFF
Mr. Bissell advised that the applicant for ADB-95-151 has withdrawn their application. It will be continued to a
future date with new posting and mailing notification.
3. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD COMMENTS
None.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION BY BOARDMEMBER FRANIK� SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER YOUNG, TO APPROVE
THE MINUTES OF MAY 15, 1996 AS SUBMFITED. MOTION CARRIED.
5. CONSENT,AGENDA
There were no items on the consent agenda.
6. AGENDA
MOTION BY BOARDMEMBER YOUNG, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER GOODRIM TO
MOVE ADB-96-52 TO THE END OF THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED.
PLACEMENT OF A CLASSIC CAR ON THE ROOF OF THE CANOPY AT A USED
CAR LOT
DonaldFernandez
22730 11ighway 99
MW Approval)
Donald Fernandez, 9220 Sandpoint Way Northeast, Seattle, the applican4'was present.
Amhkwftu,d Desip Boud
Am 19. 1996
Pop I
r
0 0
LAJ
L)
0
U) 0
U) UJ
UJ X
-J F-
U) L-L
0.
LLJ
C<
C <
LL 5
a
Z F-
0
Z
LLI LU
0-
01--
LU L"
M L)
�- F-
U- 0
Z
L Li Cn
U y
F- F-
0
Z
Z 0
a]
IS& Bissell advised that the applicant is proposing to place a 1938 "woody" on the roof of the canopy.
The applicant states that the exterior of the car has been restored, but all of the internal parts have been
removed. The ECDC classifies this proposal as an identification structure, which is allowed and is
excluded from sign area and height requirements. Because this is the first request of this type ever
received by the City, staff has no recommendation at this time. The Board should review this request
and base their decision on the design guidelines.
Boardmember Young inquired what other VIM of identification structures are located within the City.
Mr. Bissell said the Chevron station has the Chevron symbol located on their property with no lettering
on it, That would be considered an identification structure. Boardinember Oaklief noted that a steeple
on a church could be considered an identification structure. .
Boardinember Young inquired if this car will be protected from the elements. W. Fernandez replied
that he has finished the car with several coats of rust proof paint. There is a new cloth roof that can be
replaced when it is faded. The car will be placed on a roof that has no way of access. He continued by
stating that he has cleaned up this site significantly since he began leasing the property. There will be
two spot lights on the car: One will shine up and one will shine down. The headlights will also be
working on the car. This will enable people to see if anyone does access the roof and attempt to
vandalize the car.
Boardmember Goodrick inquired how long this car would look good. Mr. Fernandez said his building
will always look good. He just repainted the entire building. The paint job on the car will last a
minimum of five years. He pointed out that if the car does not look nice, he is defeating the purpose of
having it there. I -Hs business depends upon the site being kept up.
Boardmember Frank said she likes the concept of the proposal. Boardmember Goodrick said she is not
as positive since she has some concerns about upkeep. Boardinember Young felt the applicant answered
the Board's questions as far as quality and security. He felt this proposal would allow a unique way to
advertise a business.
Boardmember Oaklief advised that appearance is very important. Consideration of this proposal would
be different if the business were located in the downtown bowl area. But since this business is located
along 11ighway 99, Boardmember Oaklief agreed that it is a unique way to advertise. He is satisfied
with this proposal because of the unique area it is located in.
Boardmember Oaklief noted that new signs are part of this proposal. Mr. Bissell explained that
information regarding the signs was not included in the Board's packet because the sign portion of the
application is exempt from the ADB review requirement. Staff will make this determination upon
application of the sign permits. The only item before the Board at this time is the car on top of the roof.
MOTION By BOARDMEMBER FRANY, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER YOUNG, TO
APPROVE ADB-96-52 AS SUBMITTED. MOTION CARRIED.
ADB-96-75 NEW NEON ILLUMINATED SIGN AND PAINTED WALL SIGN
Edmonds Yacht Sales
336 Admiral Way
(Final Appr ",l)
Ron Jacobs, Berry Neon Signs, .210 27th Place, Lynnwood, was present to represent the applicant
Mr. Bissell advised that the Port"6f Edmonds is leasing space to Edmonds Yacht Sales in their building
located at 336 Admiral Way. The applicant is proposing two signs. One would be painted wood on the
north end of the east side of the building. The other would be neon illuminated and located on the east
r�
Architechiral Design Board
June 19, 1996
Pap 2
d 6!
Lo
L"
En LL
0
LU
<
UJ
3:3
z
1-01
z
LU LU,
2 :)�
D
0—
a �-
LU
U- 0
z
LU (n
z
t 0
[7-
I_)
A
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
STAFF REPORT
June 14,1996
ADB-96-82 PLACEMENT OF A SSIC CAR ON THE RQQF
OF THE CANOPY AT -A USED CAR L01
A. Applicant/Properly Owner Architec-1111epresentative
Donald Fernandez
22730 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
B. Site Location: 22730 Highway 99
C. Introduction/Proposal: The subject site is currently used as a used car sales lot.
The existing building has a canopy which extends toward the street. The applicant is
proposing to place a 1938 "woody" on the roof of the canopy. The applicant states that
exterior of the car has been restored, but all of the internal parts (engine, transmission,
suspension etc.) have been removed. The Edmonds Community Development Code would
classify this proposal as an identification structure. An identification structure is allowed,
and is excluded ftorn sign area and height requirements.
F. Summary: In order for the Board to approve this item, the Board must find that the
proposal is constant with the design criteria found in the Building Design and Site treatment
Guide.
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Applicant's declarations, elevations and site plan
0 17,
r
K
lo
x
184th
185th
188th
LO
192nd I
z
-L-j—
,.get
196th
E
Ato
�'5
Z--
z
a
)3rd
Cl
206
x
04
MW
C,
Main S
208th
210th
Wal ut
21 th
T
nR.QAi-*
!
ph.
218th
218th
220th
V.1h 1,
AQB-96-
23
232nd
23it
234th
h
238
8
—Oin
2
242nd
24
244
h
6�H �:)'ION SI�U
0
.J-�31N(1300 31-11 JO AllIVnO 311101300
NVHI HV310 SS31 Sl 3NVUJ SIHI NI
IN3wn:)Oo 31-11 31 :301ION