The URL can be used to link to this page

23128 76TH AVE W.pdf��'s t . 18 C) �j 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 P- HEARING EXAMINER 010 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION iij. 'V4'� OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF EDMONDS Cn — Lu 3:" (n U. APPLICANT: Robert Payne LU 2 � 9 _j" CASE NO.: V 96-108 LL Ln LOCATION: 23128 76flAvenue West Z I-- APPLICATION: Application to reduce the required side setback from 10-feet to 8- 1.- 0 Z I'- feet 6-inches, for an existing sunroom addition (see Exhibit A, LU Lu Attachments I and 2). 0— REVIEW PROCESS: Variance; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes 0!= i. final decision. LU Lu . X LL 0" MAJOR ISSUES: Z: .. ui M U = X a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) P 0 Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site Z Development Standards). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.85 (VARIANCES). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION: Staff Recommendation: Approve with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approve with conditions 0 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The hearing on the Payne application was opened at 9:00 a.m., October 3, 1996, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 9:25 a.m. Participants at the public 0 hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the Planning Division. 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — He.kinan, Japan t 0 01 C 0 V-USUINU. V vo-lub Page 2 HEARING COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing. From the City: Kirk Vinish, Planner, reviewed the staff advisory report (Exhibit A) which recommended approval of the application, with conditions. He noted that the City should have taken some action when the City accepted the roadway dedication from the applicant which made the variance necessary. From the Applicant: Robert Payne, Applicant, said: • He has lived in the same area over 52 years. • He built the sunroom not realizing a permit was required. • The sunroom serves as a greenhouse. • There was no access road there when he moved in and a neighbor wanted an access road so he deeded access to the City for $1.00. He later deeded an additional 5 feet to the City for access purposes for another $ 1.00. • If he hadn't deeded anything to the City for access purposes he wouldn't need a variance. From the Community: Robin Bisson, Neighbor, said: • She believes the sunroom is detrimental due to the cars that are generally parked in front of the sunroom and they stick out so far they impedes traffic. • The glare is so bad off the sunroom glass that she and her husband have to close the drapes on their windows. • She wanted to know where additional room for traffic will come from when development continues on the street. * She said she understands her husband can park on the existing blacktop. Response from the Applicant: Robert Payne said: * There is 17 feet of blacktop and the blacktop is not in the center of the roadway. Ms. Bisson's husband parks on the blacktop which only leaves 8 feet of blacktop to drive on. 0 0 Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V 96-108 Page 3 Response from the City: Z Kirk Vinish confirmed that the roadway was dedicated to the City. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS U01 A. SITE DESCRIPTION in uj� LU :r �: 1. Site Development And Zoning: _J �_i' W W I 0� a. Facts: 1) Size: The subject property is approximately 18,467 square feet in area (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). LL D Ln 01 2) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Multi -Family Lu� Residential (RM-2.4). Z �_ CY 3) Terrain and Vegetation: The subject property is generally flat, with all Z �-i LU W! open areas vegetated (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). U 2. Neighboring Development And Zoning: a E != a. Facts: L UJ LWU North: Developed with multi -family residences, and zoned RM-2.4 U. Z! (see Exhibit A, Attachment 3). L�j U)i U X; 2) South: Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned 0 RS-8 (see Exhibit A, Attachment 3). Z 3) East: Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned RS-8 (see Exhibit A, Attachment 3). 4) West: Developed with multi -residences, and zoned CG (see Exhibit A, Attachment 3). b. Conclusion: The proposed development would be consistent with the surrounding zoning and development. B. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE 1) The fundamental site development standards in a RM-2.4 zone are set 1. Compliance with RM-2.4 Zoning Standards a. Facts: forth in Chapter 16.20.030. t 2) Minimum side setback in the RM-2.4 zone is 15-feet. b. Conclusion: Except for the requested street and side setback variance, the applicant is proposing to legalize a structure which confonns to the RS-8 development standards for locating structures on a lot. 2. Compliance with requirement for a Variance Z ECDC Chapter 20. 1 5B. 180.A, states an applicant may request a variance from Z UJ:' the standards of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC < Chapter 20.85 (Variances). Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth the UJ -J mechanism whereby a provision of the Code may be varied on a case -by -case 0 LU basis if the application of the provision would result in an unusual and unreasonable hardship (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2). Cn U- 0 a. Facts: -J 1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which 91 a variance request must comply in order to be granted by the Hearing Ln') CO3 Examiner. These criteria include: a special circumstance must exist; X Lu. no special privilege is granted; the proposal is consistent with the Z 1--, Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code; the proposal will not be 0: �i 1--� detrimental and is the minimum necessary. LU LU: M, 2) Variances may be used to modify bulk standards. They may not be used to modify use or procedural requirements. 0 0 UJ LU 3) The existing sunroom/garage does not encroach upon the setback any more than the existing residence. According to the applicant the house 0 was constructed in 1948. Z: 6i 4) The subject property was annexed to the City of Edmonds in 1961. 0 5) According to the applicant the sunroom was constructed in 1963 Z without permits. 6) The City does not have any record of required side setbacks for the RM-2.4 zone in 1963. However, the building code would have required a 5-foot setback. 7) It appears that the applicant dedicated the adjacent road to the City in 1965. b. Conclusions: 0 1) Special Circumstances Special circumstances include the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the property and public necessity for public structures. Special circumstances appear to exist due to the actions of the City in requesting the road to be dedicated and thereby creating the need for a 0 variance. If the applicant had obtained a permit prior to construction or in 1965 when the road was constructed a variance would not be required at this time. Finally, if the applicant had not dedicated the road to the City the need for a variance would not be necessary. 2) Special Privilege It does not appear that any special privilege will be demonstrated in granting this variance in that other properties in the same zone with 0 LU: U) LL LU 0 _J1 LL UJ! X: Z F-, �_ 0. Z �-, LU UJ; Mi 0 a W ILLU X (.) F- LL Z LU U) 0 Z t 0 0 similar circumstances may also qualify for a variance (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2). 3) Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the continued development of the site in a manner consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan designation of the site (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2). 4) Not Detrimental Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare if the sunroom meets the requirements of the building code (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2). 5) Minimum Required The request is the minimum necessary for accommodation of the existing sunroom (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2 and 4). C. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 1 . a. Fact: No comments were submitted by other departments. D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC) a. Fact: The subject property is designated as "Corridor Development!'. b. Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site. 2. a. Facts: The Comprehensive Plan, Residential Development section, identifies goals and policies which relate to "Residential Development" in the City. Specific goals and policies are discussed in detail below-. 1) Section B states as a goal of the City that: "High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted ... .. 2) Section B.2 states as a policy of the City that: "Protect neighborhoods from incompatible additions to existing buildings that do not harmonize with existing structures in the area. " b. Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the above adopted goals and policies of the City for the development of residential property in the City. �77 0 Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V 96-108 Page 6 DECISION Z X Z. UJ Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a side setback variance is approved, subject to the following conditions: LU -J U 0 W a 1. This variance is to allow the proposal in the location identified on the proposed site plan 0) UJ (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). Any other structures, additions or remodels would have to W X -J �- conform with the typical setbacks or height requirements for the zone or obtain another (n LLJ ot variance. W 2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds L.L <, Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure =)I D 0 compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. LU Z 3. The applicant must obtain a building permit for the subject sunroom. addition. J-0 Z �- 4. The permit is transferable. W W 0— Entered this 9th day of October, 1996, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner a �-r , LU �U- X U under Chapter 20.100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds. Z LU U) u— T �- i-� a . .. . .. .. . . . WC3t,� 0 Z Ron McConnell Hearing Examiner RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS V The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. 0 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land t 0 which is the sub ect of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must j cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. APPEALS Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the 0 U) — (n LU. LU LI) LL 0 Uj LL (n Ljj� z Z LU Lu;� D! 0 0 �- L Uj U W U z t a NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office. EXHEBIT: The following exhibit was offered and entered into the record. A. Planning Division Advisory Report, with 4 attachments PARTIES oF RECORD: Robert Payne 23128 76' Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 T. Robin Bisson 23204 76th Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 Planning Division Engineering Division Fire Department Parks Department Public Works Department 0 Notice of Development Application & Public Hearing Date of Notice: September 18, 1996 File # V-96-1 08 '4� ApplicantInformation-,-: Name of Applicant: ............ C) Robert Payne Requested Permits Zi Variance and Building Date of Application:.... Z 8/27196 and Approvals:... ............ Date application Complete: 9/17/96 Other Required Permits � Unknown .1 yet applied for (if Project Location: 23128 76th Ave. K known): ........................ Project Description: ........... Z Variance to reduce the required Iti.loot Required Studies related Z Unknown side setback Iran the south property line to the project:... ............... to 8.5-feet for an existing sunramn addition. Related Environmental Z Critical Areas Checklist Documents: .................... Public Comments dueby%. October3,1996 City Contact for project: Kirk Vinish C. Date: October 3, 1996 Time: 9:00 A.M. Place: Plaza meeting Room - 650 Main St, Edmonds Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Community Services Department, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. (206) 771-0220. Public carouname should also be sent to this adrims, The dcchico on thk developent qqlicaaou ,It Is ourd 'ddiicaal i`�ii'-aoiaa The removal, mutilation, clestruction, or concealment of this This notice may be removed Warning! notice before the hearing date is a misclarommor punishable by after, October 3,1996 fine and imprisonment —11T7 7Z Kn,'P 7 32X Q UP& —7 2SX10J z 11 < LU, LU -j (.)0' U) U) Uj U3 Cn LL C) U1 LL Cl LU, z I-- �- 0 Z �- LU Uj 0 Uj UJI z LU U) L) y t5 �-. z 0 to Lawrence Sackett Juanita Sackett Daniel Curnutt David & Mary Miller 23108 75th Ave W 23129 76th Ave W 23128 75th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8517 Edmonds,'WA 98026-8703 Edmonds, WA 98026-8517 James & Sallee Conn Lore Raupach Kevin Hannam 23117 76th Ave W 23118 75th Ave W 23208 75th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8703 Edmonds, WA 98026-8517 Edmonds, WA 98026-8518 Dennis Burns Glenn Salmi c De c 23206 75th Ave W 2&3f& 23205 76th Ave W '*6 w -8518 Edmonds, WA 98026-8705 -8705 Edmonds, WA 98026 E 98026 Hyong 76im Russell Herrick James a Mariella Roberts 23225 76th Ave W 23214 75th Ave W 23215 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8705 Edmonds, WA 98026-8518 Edmonds, WA 98026-8705 9830 INVESTMENTS NO 2 9830 Wilshire Blvd Beverly Hills, CA 90212-1804 Lee & Penny Stycket 15539 61st Ave NE Bothell, WA 98011-4301 Archie Butler 23125 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA 98026-8737 Gene Chard * 23124 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8702 T h 11af �hy PRINCE COMPANY om U� k ir 4230 W Cramer St 433 & 15 StoC*, C 95207 204 Seattle, -WA 98199-1005 A A Cerauli 23302 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8706 Harry Arey 23138.76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8702 Howard Schroeder Virginia Schroeder PO Box 3367 Lynnwood, WA 98046-3367 Robert & Ruth Payne, Jr. 23128-76th Ave W Edmonds, Wa 98026-8702 Ryan & Lynda Payne 14907 19th Ave SE Mill Creeko Wa 98012-8222 Mark & T Robin Bisson 23204 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 0 David Sharp Roger Bueing Debbie Peterson Phyllis Weishaar 23202 76th Ave w 232i2 76th Ave W 23148 76th Ave W 'Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 Edmonds, WA 98026-8702 z M Z:j UJI JO e V1 4 SW #25 goo H S 23 e W 9 Ak( !WS, Xyung Christie Kang 23220 76th Ave W CC 21 < :)i 00"d, 98036-6734 E S98026-8704 Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 - uj u! -J 01 W 01 U) LUI Howard H011oman David Gerde W M1 Lorelei Holloman Virginia Hawkins-Gerde S n Cha Bae rn LL 23203 77th Pl W 23207 77th Hawkins-Gerde 7 W �un&,,X� te LU 0 Edmonds, WA 98026-8764 Edmonds, WA 98026 OW02 6 - 8 8 3 6 Ecb WA ti DI CO :F W! Xazen Sahar Xahmoud Ki Jun Se Soon Ae Chon Ali Faezah Alghanim M; 23217 77th PI W 7709 233rd Pl SW 7707 233rd P1 SW Z Edmonds, wA 98026-8764 Edmonds, WA 98026-8763 Edmonds, WA 98026-8763 Oi z Uj Lu! Chen h & Assoc. Inc. �Y. 1813 idvale Ave. N. //A 0- a t Sea;Me", WA 98133 W W1 Z, zi =I,' � Ete . . ......... FZ . ..... < r ZI Attach this notarized declaration to the a4jacent property owners fist U 01 LU Cn U5 Cn U- On my oath, I certifY that. the names and addresses provided rTresent all properties -0 LU located Within 300 feet of the subject property. -J LL < X UJ z I-- 0i *Q�re of Applicant VAPOtcbints Representative UJ LUI Subscribed and sworn to before me thi day 'of 'J "1.9 UJ LU Mr 0: x; Notary Public in and for of Washington Residingat to 1? AM.dod\IATem]p\fo= z X F- cn — 0) W LU -J Cn U- 10 LL T) UJ z j.. 0 Z �- UJ LU U 0- 0 �- LU LL C 2 LU U U 0 z to k "i V ll'.� FILE NO.: V-96-108 APPLICANT: Payne NOTICE OF HEARING AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY' OF SNOHOMISH) 1, DIANE M. CUNNINGHAM, sworn on'oath, depose and say: That on the 18th day of September, 1996, the attached Notice of Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. �U- NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS -THIS NOTICE -IT IS DUE TO THE 01 IS LESS CLEj OFTHE...DO,Ct 0_1 Public Works Planning Parks and Recreation Engineering CITY OF EDMONDS- BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Letter of Transmittal Date: October 3, 1996 LU To: Ron McConnell U_ < Hearing Examiner 0 tul z �-J Subject: V-96-108 R LU LU. Transmitting Sign up sheet 10 L UJ UJ For Your Information: V As you requested: z UJ Cn For your file: z Comment: Note attachments: 7_4774 Sincerely, 0 Diane M. Cunningham, Administrative Assistant 0 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan A lw,� ig, T, V- 1'1�.�,�.� AN -'1Z N Wn% T, F q1M Iq .0, N E-X-H-1BITS LIST FILE NO. V-96-108 z (Submitted as of October 3, 1996) LU cc A. Planning Division Staff Advisory Report (prepared 9/25L26). U En U) LU Uj X en LL 10 Z3 U. L4 UJ z I—, z W IUI2 D 0 UJ Uj U. 0 ZI 0 0 (YR)-(#)FYJ(DATE).REPORTS%STAFREXHIBITS I It UJV W14111 atl= 1. Call to Order 2. Public Hearings a. FILE NO. V-96-108; Application by Robert Payne for a Variance to reduce the required 15-foot side setback from the south property line from 15-feet to 8.5-fect to legalize the setback of a sunroom addition which was added to the existing single-family residence without an approved building permit. The subject property is located at 23128 76th Avenue West and is zoned RM-2.4. b. FILE NO. V-96-1 11; Application by Deborah and Rebecca Satterlee, for a Variance to reduce the required 7.5-foot side setback from the west property fine to 4-feet to allow the construction of a second story addition. The applicant is requesting the variance to allow the proposed second story addition to protrude into the side setback by 3.5-fect in order to match the current west wall of the first floor. Ile subject property is located at 7716 200th Street Southwest and is zoned RS-8. 3. Administrative Reports - No Reports. 4. Adjournment PARIUNG AND MEETING ROOMS ARE ACCESSIBLE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILIT'm (Contact the City Clerk at 771-024S with 24 hours adWnce noticefor special accommodations) 1003KDOCACENDASWE U) U. LU 0 N � C2 T C1 :r z �- 0 LU Uj L) (A 0- 0 �- Uj LL LL C 2 LU tj L) 0 z W 0 1 cc: Ron McConnell, Hearing Examiner 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 1. o I Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Z X Z LLJ UJ L) -j L) 0 U) 0 Li) LJJ LU U) LL 0 LU LL D Z �- 0 Z I-- LU LU (n 0 a UJ Uj L) C Z ui tr 0 Z C 0 .. ........ CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: Ron McConnell, Hearing Examiner From: Z-Z Kirk J. Vinish, AICP Planner Date: SEPTEMBER 25,1996 File: V-96-108 ROBERTPAYNE Hearing Date, Time, And Place: October 3. 1996, At 9:00 AM Plaza Room - Edmonds Library 650 Main Street TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 2 A. Application ........................................................................................................ I ............. ............ .............. 2 B. Recommendations ................................................................................................ I ....................................... 2 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS ............................... ........................................... 2 A. Site Description ......................... I .............. .................................................................................................. 2 B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance ...................... . ....... ................ I ............... 3 C. Technical Committee. ................................................................................................................................. 4 D. Comprehensive Plan (ECDC) .................................................................................................................. �.A III. RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS ........................................................................... 5 A. Request for Reconsideration ....................................................................................................................... 5 B. Appeals ...... ...... ..................... ....... ........ .......... 5 IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL ........................................................................................................... 5 V. NOTICETO COUNTY ASSESSOR ...................................................... I ............. .......... ........... 5� VI. APPENDICES .......................................................................................... ........................ 5 VII. PARTIES OF RECORD ................................................. I ........... 5 ................................... V96-108DOC /Septcrnber25,1996 /Staff Rport Robert Payne Fitt No. V-96-1 08 Page 2 of$ INTRODUCTION A. Application I . Applican : Robert Payne (see Attachment 1). 2. Site Location: 23128 76th Avenue West (see Attachments 3 and 4). 3. Reque Application to reduce the required side setback from 10-feet to 8-feet 6-inches, for an existing sunroom addition (see Attachments I and 2). 4. Royiew Process: Variance; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision. 5. MAjor Issues: a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site Development Standards). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.85 (VARIANCES). B. Recommendations Based on statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report we recommend Approval of this application subject to the following conditions: I . Ibis variance is to allow the proposal in the location identified on the proposed site plan (see Attachment 4). Any other structures, additions or remodels would have to conform with the typical setbacks or height requirements for the zone or obtain another variance. 2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code. It is the responsibility ofthe applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 3. The applicant must obtain a building permit prior to construction. 4. The permit should be transferable. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. Site Description 1. Site Development And Zoning: a) (1) Sim: The subject property is approximately 18,467 square fbet in area (see Attachment 4). (2) Zonin : The zoning ofthe subject property is Multi-ramily Residential (RM-2.4). (3) Terrain and Ve2etation: The subject property is generally flat, with all open areas vegetated (see Attachment 4). Robert Payne File No. V-96-108 Page 3 of 5 2. Neighboring Development And Zoning: a) Fich: (1) No9h: Developed with multi -family residences, and zoned RM-2.4 (see Attachment 3). (2) &ulh: Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned RS-8 (see Attachment 3). (3) L-19: Developed with detached single family residences, and zoned RS-8 (see Attachment 3). (4) _Wsq: Developed with multi -residences, and zoned CG (see Attachment 3). b) C9jLdvdN: The proposed development would be consistent with the surrounding zoning and development. B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance 1. Compliance with RM-2.4 Zoning Standards a) FAck: (1) The fundamental site development standards in a RM-2.4 zone are set forth in Chapter 16.20.030. (2) Minimum side setback in the RM-2.4 zone is 15-feet. b) Conclusion: Except for the requested street and side setback variance, the applicant is proposing to build a structure which conforms to the RS-8 development standards for locating structures on a lot. 2. Compliance with requirement for a Variance ECDC Chapter 20.15B. I 8O.A, states an applicant may request a variance from the standards of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC Chapter 20.85 (Variances). Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby a provision of the Code may be varied on a case -by -case basis if the application of the provision would result in an unusual and unreasonable hardship (see Attachment 2). a) FAch: (1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which a variance request must comply in order to be granted by the Hearing Examiner. These criteria include: a special circumstance must exist; no special privilege is granted; the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code; the proposal will not be detrimental and is the minimum necessary. (2) Variances may be used to modify bulk standards. They may not be used to modify use or procedural requirements. (3) The sunroom/garage does not encroach upon the setback any more than the existing residence. According to the applicant the house was constructed in 1948. (4) The subject property was annexed to the City of Edmonds in 196 1. (5) According to the applicant the sunroom was constructed in 1963 without permits. (6) The City does not have any record of required side setbacks for the RM-2.4 zone in 1963. However, the building code would have required a 5-foot setback. (7) It appears that the applicant dedicated the adjacent road to the City in 1965. V96- I OSMOC I September 25, 1996 Staff Report t 7 d Robert Payne File No. V-96-108 Page 4 of 5 b) Conclusions: (1) Special!Cir-cumstances Special circumstances include the SiZe, Shape, topography, location or surroundings of the property and public necessity for public structures. Special circumstances appear to exist due to the actions of the City in requesting the road to be dedicated and thereby creating the need for a variance. If the applicant had obtained a perm it prior to construction or in 1965 when the road was constructed a variance would not be required at this time. Finally, if the applicant had not dedicated the road to the City the need for a variance would not be necessary. (2) 5KdWTAy1JW It does not appear that any special privilege will be demonstrated in granting this, variance in that other properties in the same zone with similar circumstances would also qualify for a variance (see Attachment 2). (3) Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the continued development of the site in a manner consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan designation ofthe site (see Attachment 2). (4) N&tD&IdMMW Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare (see Attachment 2). (5) Minimum Required The request is the minimum necessary fbi accommodation of the sunroom (see Attachments 2 and 4). C. Technical Committee 1. Fact: No comments were submitted by other departments. D. Comprehensive Plan (ECDC) La. Fact: The subject property is designated as "Corridor Developmenf'. b. Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site. 2. a. FAcb: The Comprehensive Plan, Residential Development section, identifies goals and policies which relate to "Residential Development" in the City. Specific goals and policies are discussed in detail below. (1) Section B states as a goal of the City that: "High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained andpromoted ... .. (2) Section B.2 states as a policy of the City that: "Protect neighborhoods from incompatible additions to existing buildings that do not harmonize with existing structures in the area. b. Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the above adopted goals and policies ofthe City for the development of residential property in the City. V96-108.DOC/S.eptembei2S,l996/StaffReport r, Ail -7 Robert Payne File No. V-96-108 Page 5 of5 III. RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS The following is a summary ofthe deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. A. Request for Reconsideration Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. 1B. Appeals Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date ofthe decision being appealed. IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration date! V. NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR Ile property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office. VI. APPENDICES Attachments 1 through 4 are attached. 1. Application 2. Declarations ofthe Applicant 3. Vicinity Map 4. Site Plan VII. PARTIES OF RECORD Applicant Planning Division Engineering Division Fire Department Parks Department Public Works Department V96-108.130C / September 25, 1996 1 Staff Report z< t2) z- LU 0C LL1 0 U) a U) LU LU :C -J F- LOL; LL MI Ln 0� LU z F- 1- 0 Z !- LU LL1 0 0 M 0 z LU (n U 0 z to city of ec'-honds land use application L3 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD 13 COMP PLAN AMENDMENT E3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 13 HOME OCCUPATION Q FORMAL SUBDIVISION Q SHORT SUBDIVISION 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Q PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT I STREET VACATION 0 REZONE 0 SHORELINE PERMIT Ed VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION Q OTHER CA-q�'Z-13? IApplicant Address I Property Address or I Property Owner A IAddress JAgent FILE #—V- ZONE PM2�.+ DATE 8�IZ7/9& REC'DBY '/Yv- \J FEE 6 132,011, -RECEIPT# 2-r7z4 HEARING DATE *E Q STAFF 0 P13 13 ADB L3 CC ACTION TAKEN: APPEAL# - -2? �7 Tax Acc # 57(,0-7 '- 0-00- C)1(0- b+ — Sec._ Twp._Rng. Legal Description I Details of Project or Proposed Use The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information fumished by the applicant his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ hert its permission for public officials and the pfoff �f #I,- ('N -4 enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting aftendant to this SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT A17ACHMENT I File No. V-96-108 rn —� fj) LU i U3 Cf) LL 0 LU LL LI) X W! 3: Ol Z Lu tm;l 00 W LU U- 0 z LU U:F �- t-I 0 z FY av "o4w 2/, '/We 771eX-4A-=-4W -; P7 &-o V 74: Z > V 7; Ve el 7 3 P,= 0 4 4, �: p, r "Y'-> fj 1y"v'v4'JV 45 /LZ7 7- 0 . Cl 7y ' WA/ A; Z3�ZO - 76711,40-5 W -COX,OA4P$. WW. 90OZt, 778-Zg-l* en LL LU 0 ca -i U- T cl = w �- 3: z �- J.-O Z �- LU LLJ L) 0- 0 �- LU LL c LU 0 z t 0 W,41 I 1 1 ATTAcHMENT 2 File No. V -9&'.108 0 ON SON 2 Fm%4 71 m, M� L On -,k I.- mz- F- LU cr LLJ 0 (n a U) LU Lu U) LLi 0 LLI :2 rI 9m, LL < D j z �- 0 Z �- uj LU Lu UJI L) LL 0 z LU (D 0 z t 0 Vicinit and Zoning Map y ATTACHMENT 3 File No. V-96-108 0 L Lo ai to P44 < z < 8V-Z4; IN. 00' 8411 Z17 1 - /0' A m WYAIZ -31 '� e"�Vjr !Leer= tm 'l Y R. C-ZO Z" :V, Zg 0 1Z 4 13'35' RA 32 25XI[: Z F- 0 Lu: Lu —i (n U. 0 LU LL Ln DI 01 W: Z LU Lul 0 0 P LU Z LU (1) U -+ t5 �-, Z 0 Your application is now complete and has been scheduled for public hearing at the time and place listed below. Action: H . nZ to consider a Variance. File No. Assigned: Y-96-108 Date of Hearing: -October 3. 19% Time: 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Place: Plaza Room, Edmonds Library 650 Main Street Hearing Body: Hearing Fxaminer Please be aware that your presence at the hearing is highly advisable. If an applicant or his representative is not present, the item may be moved to the end of the agenda. Items not reached by the end of the hearing will be continued to the following month's agenda. I If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact 1Grk J. Vinish, Project Planner at 771-0220. Sincerely, Community Services Department - Planning Division rey �SWilson, AICP Current Planning Supervisor pc: File No. V-96-108 Kirk J. Vinish, Project Planner ^ChWLeMDx 0 Incorporated August 11, IM 0 09/171%.CORMS%MOTICE Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County and that the notice ........................................ ....... P.u.bli.c ... H.ear.ing./.De.v,e.1.o.pme.n.t ... Appjj,!�q,�ion .. ....... .. .... .. ... I .. .. . .. ....... .. . ......... ..................... Robert Payne ........................................................................... .......................................................... File No.: V-96-108 ................................................................ I ..................................................................... a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the' following days and times, namely: September 19, 1996 .................................................... I ............................................... ................................ I ..................................................... I ............................................... and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. . . . . . . . . . . . . -/U--/n?-I2 .......................... Principal Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this ........... �9th .............. da �S��ekptember 96 ................. ...... . ..... ...... ..... . ....... .... . .......... . ............ . ... ....... . ....... I ...... otary Public in and for the 0 Washington, residing at Everett, Snoho i h O'SE j oil M PUSL 0 OF WA B-2-1 0: LU -j U) LL oi LU 2 � g:31 LL 01 z ;7- 0, z LU LU i 0 C3 Uj Lul X L) z U.; U) L) y 1,- 1--, 0 z t 0 40QVP-R PAC118 op i-Aormlm- (Including =over Page) RSC19�10MIW -1-010001iller Numtber. PA4--SIM11-12 Automatic 43rioup It C3rcKip III It there lama Cluring dcm:Puments are reoefvod Incor" letio zloame call r, 20 and ask - ----- (200) 71 foc Gonderle'reteqoptor Numfzor* (206) 7711-0221 IRIS=* W-;. , .1 P bg-a—d-Q— zjnd=.c!2 L4-44---� =Z%&A=e L945a--A-d C-f Inconoormtod August 21. ISPO stater Cition Intornalklonal . Makinan, Japan TRANSMISSION REPORT. THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT - ** COUNT # 2 *** SEND *** NO -11777�393049 REMOT STATION 1. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT I TOTAL 0:01'17" 2 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 Sister 6t*i-e-S, In-te*-rn,-a-fl o* n—al --- - H--e,k-in-a-n-, Japa. n '0� Cl) LL LU 0 LL Uj Z Z Uj LLJ 0- a �_ UJ LL !i- C LU 0 Z K i� THIS I "AL AD Q`:"�TISE IENT AND SHOULD BE 13ILLED h'r T E PLANNING DEPI_ARTMENT PUBLIC HEARING and NOTICE OF. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Name of Applicant. Robert Payne File No.: V-96-108 Project Location: 23128 76th Avenue West Project Description: Variance to reduce the required 15-foot side setback from the South property fine to 8.5-feet for an existing sunroom addition. City Contact: l(irk Vinish Public Comment Period Due By: 10/3/96 Name of Applicant: Deborah and Rebecca Safteriee File No.: V-99-111 Project Location: 7716 200th St SW Project Description: Variance to reduce the required 7.5-foot side setback from the' west proparly line to 4-feet to allow4he construction of a second story addition which protrudes into the side setback by 3.5-feet in order to match the current west wall of the first floor. City Contact, l(irk Vinish Public Comment Period Due By: 10/3/96 PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Time: 9:00 AM Date:1 October 3, 1996 Location: Plaza Meeting Room - 650 Main St, Edmonds Publish: Sept. 19, 1996 Sandy Chase, City Clerk 0 , 0 'tED- QUITCLAIM D tora. herein Rayne,..."...i and...Ruth R..,.P � #.. Y ayne....his wife .................. 0 "ren ............ ............ .... ............. . ....... ............. . .. .............. . ............. ........................ ....... : ......................................... ............... neldoration of mittmal..h6nefl.ta..�to..be-4erived . ................... .................. ......... for th; co' .......................... ............ the receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, and also of benefits to accrue .,:111AM .. ......... by reason a! laying out and establishing a public road throu gh� ............... property, and which la.hera'after described, do convey, release and quit -claim to the City of Edmonds, State of Washington, for the use of the b c forever, as a public road im 11 I and highway. all interest In the following described.real estate, viz: The South thirty feet of Tract 16, Skelton's Uke McAleer rive Acre Tracts as recorded In Volume 6 of Plats, Pape 21t Records of Snohomish CountyO.Washington, it it CO NO SALES� TAX REQUIRED IN 16 196� BY AtUmted In the County of Snohomish. State of Washington. Deputy The Grantor.5 hereby agree and consent to the establishment of said road" as surveyed and of.record' In -the City of Edmonds runginor's office as Survey No . . ....... and to the porpe tUld maintenance of the same as a City Street, and waive all clalm for damages of whatever kind which may be occasioned to adjacent land by the location, establish t, construction, draluago and maintenance of said atrect, and,agrees and consents to the right of the City to "nocnessary lopes for cuts and fills whenever tjiey extend beyond the right-of-way line, upon above m6ntioned malco all n a a at ree , a I In conformity with standard practices of City atreet. construction, and to the same extent and purpose as If the rights herein granted had been acquired by condemnation proceedings under Eminent Domain Statutes of the State of Washington . ........ ................ �... .................... ... ............. .. ................ I .................. ................ . . ........ . ... I .......... Sald.covenants shall run with the land and be binding upon th grando a r...., .............. or I Dated this ......... day of A4d V'd sea .... . .......... ............. .... . ........ ................ n(VY -..:".;A I I APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE: V-96-108 AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING ROUTED TO: t 00aefin , n q J.k 0& re Public Works--QL2Zj26_ Parks ex Rec. 8/27/96 Staff Comments: c5ze a- At cAea( ,v� AUG 2 7 1996 RETURNED ENGINEERING Engineering-, Fire Public Works_ Parks 8z Rec. *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete RevieW • Owner, RQBERT PAYNE • Property Address 23128 76TH AVENUE WEST 1 Date of Application 8/27/96 • Type VARIANCE TO REDUCE SIDE SETBACK • Hearing RequIred1:Yes—)L_ No— Date of Hearing (if known) X—Applicalion X Fee X APO List —Title Report ......... ...... .... Vicinity Map Elevations _____PeflUon (Official Street Map) 92-138 Critical Areas Determination W Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) —A—Site Plan (11 x 17) x egals (EAsting & Proposed) ----__Environmental Assessment -----?roof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) (Variance & C. U. P.) _Environmental Checklist -A� i.- . :r Z F- LU LU U -J L3J LU -J D OLL LU L.L < -F z �- 1- 0 Z 1-- LU LU 0 UJ LU X ui �- P �L- 0 ZL Lu (n 0 z ELO-31 t 0 city of e&."londs land -use application U ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD 13 COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0 HOME OCCUPATION C) FORMAL SUBDIVISION 0 SHORT SUBDIVISION Q LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT C3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT/ STREET VACATION U REZONE E3 SHORELINE PERMIT VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION Q OTHER C'4 - C"'z - I 3g Address Property Property FILE# V-qG-MB ZONE_gMZ,+ DATE eIZ-719& REC'D BY >V-4 FEE 16 /3 2,40 RECEIPT# 2-"'j 24 17 HEARING DATE HE El STAFF Ell PB 13 ADB 0 CC ON TAKEN: L3 APPROVED El DENIED 13 APPEALED APPEAL# Agent Phone Y79 -72�S;�'Z Address Tax Acc # Sec. Twp. Rng. Legal Description Details of Project or Proposed Use 10�44 The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information fumished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. I SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT :77. T 0*1 to IN, 00' - zo 5:5 z r.. T A 'rrc.0 p6r, $# 4 IZ3 Ize it, -37, —4 6 Ovir MeA -.1 —15 O-ZO 0- 9'47 W17- 25X Io z 4 m �;" Lu� cr o! U) Ul! LU =I -1 Pi, (n U. 10 L.L T) UJI z �- z mi a)! L) 0 0 �- LU W z uj U) u y 81--, z i CrrY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION V96108.DOC rz. I- LU Cr LU -j (-)0 U) a (n LLI LU X U) LL 0 Uj < a: LL D Ln 0 r U, � x z i,- 1.— 0 Z �— LU LU U 0-- 0 1.-1 Uj UJI 0 z ul tn 0 z 0 Ila APPLICATION ROUTING FORM AND CHECKLIST RF-CIF"'t-�- AUG 3 0 1996 ENGINE018ND TO: Engineering 8/27/96 Fire 8/27/96 0 6-A Pfiblit"W Staff FILE: V-96-108 FROM: PLANNING RETURNED 22AC/-!4W— AUIJ i- Li 19"?,q �:)UBI_lc WORKS DEPI Engineering Fire Public Works�� Parks 8x Rec. *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review 31111139 1=1 - I 1 Property Address--23J.U76TH AVENUE WEST ± Date of Application 8/27/96 ± Type, VARIANC SIDE SETRAry ± Hearing Required:Yes--X— No— Date of Hearing (if known) __2L_Applicafion X Fee —X APO List . . . ...... ...... Title Report Vicinity Map _______ElevaUons ____2efifion (Official Street Map) 92-138 Critical Areas Determination Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) X Site Plan (I I x 17) __2�_Legals (Existing & Proposed) —Environmental Assessment —_____?roof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) _—___Peclarafions (Variance & C. U. P.) —__L___Environrnenta1 Checklist ril Z- LLJ x < U 0 CD LU Ln LL 0 ul LL D Ln 0 r z 1.— 0 z �— LU LIJ p 0 LIJ LU�� :C LL 0 z Uj U) 0 z 4 01 ZEN APPLICATION ROUTING FORM ROUTED TO: Engineering 8/27196 Fire 8/27196 Public Works--8Z27j9-6_-C---�,h dn IV - Staff Comments: �\4n CoV-%r,4 FILE: V-96-108 FROM: PLANNING_ VCD RETURNED AU6 2 8 Me Engineering-- PARKS & FUREMN Fire Public Works Parks at Rec P] *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner ROBERT PAYNE • Property Address 23128 76TH AVENUE WEST Date of Application -8/2 7196 Type VARIANCE TO REDLICE SIDE SETBACK Hearing Required:Yes X No— Date of Hearing (if known) X _Application _______,Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) _2L_Fee X Site Plan (11 x 17) X -APO List x egals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report Afsessment _______�Vicinity Map I ----Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADLI) --___Elevations (Variance & C. U. P.) Petition (Official Street Map) Checklist 92-138 Critical Areas Determination .......... . z Z UJ o: LLI L) -i (-)0 En 0 rn UJ L.0 (1) LL 0 LU LL z 1.- 0 Z �- LLJ Uj U 0 LJJ Lu L) LL 0 z LU (n 0 z 0 � 0 M. APPLICATION AND ROUTED TO: En nee ng — /27196, 121A Parks 81 Rec. 8/27/96 Staff FORM FILE: V-96-108 FROM: PLANNING RETURNED Engineering Fire :!F- Public Works/ Parks at Rec. *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review e Owner • Property Address 23128 76TH AVENUE WEST • Date of Application--- 8/27/96 • Type VARIANCE TO REDUCE SIDE SETBACK ± Hearing Required:Yes--X— No— Date of Hearing (if known) X----Application X___Fee X APO Ust . . ...... ......... Title Report -----Yicinity Map ---__ElevaUons Patton (Official Street Map) 92-138 Critical Areas Determination _Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.6 x 11) X Site Plan (11 x 17) -ji—Legals (EAsting & Proposed) —Environmental Assessment -----Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) —Declarations (Variance & C. U. P.) ---___Environmental Checidist 0 0 Z UJ Cr LLJ -j U 0 V) 0 (n LU LLI (n U., 0 LU LL Ln U, z F- �- 0 Z I— Lu LU UJ W L) F- LL 0 z LLJ (1) U F: P F- 0 z 71 0 C 0 z ROUTING FORM CHECKLIST ROUTED TO: Enigine'erin'tc Fire- ' ' 810196 Public Works--812L2-6_ Parks 8t Rec. 8/9/26 FILE: CU-96-103 FROM: PLANNING 4 RETURNED AUG 9 1996 0 49198 Engineering ENGINEERING Fire, Public Works Parks ex Rec *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review =0=- I Properry Address -- 601 9JH AVENUE SOUTH Date of Applicaflon 817/96 Type ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT Hearing Required:Yes-- X No— Date of Hearing (if known) X _Application X -Fee X -APO List -Title Report X -vicinity Map Elevations - Petition (Official Street Map) 96-160 _Crifical Areas Determination 2�_Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) ---___Site Plan (11 x 17) ---_Legais (Existing & Proposed) _Environmental Assessment __Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) (Variance & C. U. P.) _Environmental Checklist f z X uj: cn U Lu� tm -i 0) LLI LU 2 �l 9 :3 LL Wa u z z LU L)i 0 a t LU LU z LU cn 0 z to CrrYOFEDMONDS ENGDOMMGMMON CU96103DOC APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE: V-96-108 AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING ROUTED TO: RETURNED Engineering 8/27/96 Engineering Fire 8/27/96 Fl Public Wo Public Works ----- Parks ex Rec. 8/27/96 Parks ex Rec. Staff Comments: *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review Owner, POBEPT PAYNE— - Property Address 23128 7-6TH AVENUE WEST Date of Application 8/27/96 Type VARIANCE TO REDUCE -SIDE SETBACK Hearing Required:Yes, X NQ-- Date of Hearing (if known) x Apolication X Fee List —Title Report cinil, Map Elevations ---_PefiUon (Official Street Map) 92-138 Critical Areas Detennination Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) —2�—Site Plan (I I x 17) X --_�Legals (EAsting & Proposed) Environmental Assessment Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) Declarations (Variance & C. U. P.) ____Environmental Checklist 0 0 10; Z' F- L&J Cc LLI L) U) W LU X U- 0 LLJ LL D z F- 0 Z �- LU W cn 0- 0 F- UJ LU X z LU (n 0 z 10 z 0 . ... ..... Tcity of eknonds i' lan�d use application Q ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD El COMP PLAN AMENDMENT 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ZONE P-M 2. 0 HOME OCCUPATION L3 FORMAL SUBDIVISION Z7 19 & REC'D BY L3 SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE 6 / 3 RECEIPT# 2-\' z4 Q LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT - /7 L3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HEARING DATE C3 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT STREET VACATION *E 0 STAFF L3 PB 0 ADB El CC 0 REZONE El SHORELINE PERMIT ACTION TAKEN: VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION D APPROVED Q DENIED El APPEALED E3 OTHER CA— Cl I APPEAL# Applicant ld6,� Phone1q,F— Address - )'71/;"1 n4re, lVev, Property Address or Locat�*on Property Owner _Phone Address Agent Phone Address Tax Acc # 01( 0 Sec. Twp. Rng. Legal Description Details of Project or Proposed Use 1/1 4PUW-M/-'eA'- 44 WIW211 &vzl6i� v The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT 0 E 0 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTI E -W DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT - . A' tA �A QA f 31xsz 0 1 x ac Mffll� 02,71 -0 -mz al,7h7 .01/1-11 e,5�� C- - - - dek VL -pk do IV; �1177 Jl� Vicinity and Zoning Map E0 jl, -�J AIIJACENT PROPEM OWNERS UST Lull 15 Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent prDperty owners fist cc < UJ -J 0i Cn (n LUI -J I-- I (D U. -0 On my oath, I certify that, the names and addresses provided represent all properties W located within 300 feet of the subject property. LL Ui 3: Z �-i Z: 0i I -- I Z I— i : I ighiture of Applica-nt ofApOc�nfs Representative LU UJ' mi I Subscribed and swom to before this dayof 1-7p4* me 19 0 UJ LU LU (nt Notary Public in and for of Washington 0 Residing at "O.dodVATempltbms Z7 Uj CD Uj: Lu U) LL 0 LLJ < :3 seal x Lu� z Z LU LU. M. Uj Uj = N, F- 0 z Uj U) U --F 81-1 z 0 Lawrence Sackett Juanita Sackett 23108 75th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8517 James & Sallee Conn 23117 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8703 Daniel Curnutt David & Mary Miller 23129 76th Ave W 23128 75th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8703 Edmonds, WA 98026-8517 Lore Raupach 23118 75th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8517 Dennis Burns Glenn Salmi 23206 75th Ave W 23205 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8518 Edmonds, WA 98026-8705 Hyong *im Russell Herrick 23225 76th Ave W 23214 75th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8705 Edmonds, WA 98026-8518 9830 INVESTMENTS NO 2 9830 Wilshire Blvd Beverly Hills, CA 90212-1804 Lee & Penny Stycket 15539 61st Ave NE Bothell, WA 98011-4301 Archie Butler 23125 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA 98026-8737 Gene Chard , 23124 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8702 Thomas & Mary Murphy PRINCE COMPANY 4339 Mallard Creek Cir 4230 W Cramer St Stockton, CA 95207-5204 Seattle, WA 98199-1005 A A Cerauli Harry Arey 23302 76th Ave W 23138.76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8706 Edmonds, WA 98026-8702 Kevin Hannam 23208 75th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8518 Dean Nickle 23211 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8705 James & Mariella Roberts 23215 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8705 Howard Schroeder Virginia Schroeder PO Box 3367 Lynnwood, WA 98046-3367 Robert & Ruth Payne$ Jr. 23128-?6th Ave W Edmonds$ Wa 98026-8702 Ryan & Lynda Payne 14907 19th Ave SE Mill Creek, Wa 98012-8222 mark & T Robin Bisson 23204 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 FBI David Sharp Roger Bueing Debbie Peterson Phyllis Weishaar 23202 76th Ave W 232i2 76th Ave W 23148 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 Edmonds, WA 98026-8702 z Joanne Love Hans Szegiet Nyung Christie Kang LU$ 4100 200th St SW #25 23214 76th Ave w 23220 76th Ave w Cc M; Lynnwood, WA 98036-6734 Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 Edmonds, WA 98026-8704 LU _j 01 W"I Howard Holloman David Gerde M1 Lorelei Holloman Virginia Hawkins-Gerde Suk Yun Myuang Cha Bae W LL 23203 77th Pi w 23207 77th Hawkins-Gerde 7705 234th St SW 0 Edmonds, WA 98026-8764 Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 98026-8836 X LU Mazen & Sahar Mahmoud Ki Jun Soon Ae Chon Ali Fae zah Alghanim �i 23217 77th P1 W 7709 233rd Pl SW 7707 233rd PI SW z 1--i Edmonds, WA 98026-8764 Edmonds, WA 98026-8763 Edmonds, WA 98026-8763 ;7- 01 z LU Lut Chen h & Assoc. Inc. 1 V I A 1813 d a e Ve. N. //A 0 SealAe, WA 98133 Uj LU X U. 0: 0 z 0 EtO 0 �J� z 0 75 m 40 0 Z 0--i -i z > F-