23231 HIGHWAY 99 (2).PDF1111111111 lill
14054
23231 HWY 99
ADDRESS:
I
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 5'7&7 00a 018'00
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver E] Study Required 6raiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DA
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
SOILS REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERNUT
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER: .(eca-01-07 16L W,44 Uhll4hr- ?CcAmemll-olne
LATEMPOSTsTomiAStreet File Checklist.doc
560-018
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
uo not use tor Internabonal Mail (See reverse)
Sent to
-Ad&-1 A�V/7
Street & Number z
171,41Y
P Off)ee, State, & ZIP e
Postage
$
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
c) Return Receipt Showing to
Whom & Date Delivered
Return Receipt gvwing to Whom,
< Date, & Addressw's Address
0
0 TOTAL Postage & Fees
$
Postmark or Date
E
LL
Cn �1� j
EL
ca 77,
LL'
06
Z
10
-0
Cn 11
7
N
.0
ca
C - (D . .
0 3-: C-4
.70
0"
4
0. C'4 -0
I C�
0
bfc:) E
r- Lu.
'W
Cn
Cn
Cf)
W
F-'
F-
0
Lu
z
E
CA FILE NO. CA— 0V
C&ical Areas Checklist
--------------------------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
I. Site Address/.Location:
2.
3.
4.
Property Tax Account Number: MS-* &1,9 ppo 'I Y 4 aqs:�- ld;v
Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
Is this site currently developed? yes; _ no.
"V— '17: 'e.)
If yes; how is site developed?
----------
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire'site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% a vertical rise of
10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6.. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: A/
—0/-, ; Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:,
What season(s) of the year? 4 hf-
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain—.dZ_ of a w ater course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? J1 &4 Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: foreged Meadow shrubs —&ZL; mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs 4tc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: 'PiA
21-
0 M. ----------- P11064--n-
ne
A�.
��� SxLZ' FF_ _-
............ V 411AW!
MAW �"J "X"I"M
.... ...... ......
a hggpm
'g
MI TO W&
P:'
C. p. �g
a. W V MM I . _4
ft
fq:
qp%7.1-0.
M
0
ft-dLdK AW 1QWW
1]
City of Edmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.77I.OnO
Fax: 425.771.0221
Critical Areas Filek '
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00
Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept:
City Receipt No:, 1(2faC19
Date Mailed to Applicant:
CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Pern-dt Application for the City of
Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development
pern-dt to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date ie,**�vbmit it to the
City. The City will review �e ake a
precursory site visit, and make' doerni;natk�n of the
subsequent steps necessary t pleie i��elopxnent
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed
copy of this form to ' assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent infortnafion (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the.answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
Name
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
1 6
Name
W/ 42.
Street Address
city state zip
- aLSI-�'rY2,
Telephone ,-2
Date
d:rwepUor*nn1CACLHar#daLd00 ReOted 41102000
-8 1 R I g
�I ti
0
0
a
�I 41'1.di.l�:I,
PM11
23729
23119
23D3I
2928
7e Z V
41
7M
2i226
23138.
MI
M5.
7qff
23202
2 3420
3m- Oslo
000
Rid
74
74.
CD
!412 j:'
V, Xq
ZF
T�A
7z
ON it CA (jE NO. CA-0�0 —A
Citical Areas Checklist
--------------------------------------------------------------
Site Inform Ation (soils/topography/hydrol.ogy/Vegetation)
1. Site Address/.Location:
Property Tax Account Number: 00S-* ?,9
2. vo a,94 7�* 1919S4_ /,fly a1919 iyll
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? -,,V--.Yes; no.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire'site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than IS% (a vertical rise of 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% a vertical rise of
I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth:
7. . Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ;Approx. Depth:
What 3.eason(s) of the year? 'd Ik
8. Site is in the'floodway J4 floodplain__Jle
of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? &4 - — Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? J0
10. Site is primarily: forested _ 0.//V : me shrubs ellV mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs itc) IV
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
W1 X
. �,t�4
0.
ME
-X :.4
. ... 3% . . �; t
. . . . . . . . ...... Wig' va _
ONM -i"Al
.. .. . ..... .. .. . ... ...... ..
F V----
WIN', "M
'j.i A
"M&N.-A.-
'T.4 4
414,
AM.
A4
P V I $y. ktt &
VM MCA= ".. , A. -I: : W'% .-: . '. , � 1 1 . : $ : 4
W
MY
m
01 AN
�y
M; MV,
MS
Mu.
J. .71 Z-51,W;
A%.dLdW AW I
Critical Areas File #:
City of Edmonds critir-aiAreasChecklist Fee: $45.00
Development Services Department Date Received by Dev. Sery. Dept: 1� a4 I on
Planning Division City Receipt No:- / (0 k7 99 1 1
Phone: 425.77 I.= Date Mailed to Applicant:
Fax: 425.771.Onl
CR' ITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential CriticalAreas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or histher representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date ie, And. pv�rnit it to the
City. The City will review he-6he'-C'k'HW---
�piake a
precursory site visit� and mak# � e *na�ii�� of the
9-1 . .'
subsequent steps necessary t
elopment,
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that theanswers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
Name
Street Address
City state zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
resentative:
Name
/p/ 7
Street Address
city State zip
;Teleohone
p
Pat
Date
d.rweptIonqan&'CACLHnndoutA= Revi"d W1 02M
12�
. -1 .7;
Date: 21 March, 2002
To: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Via: Dave Gebert, City Engineerdo -312-Z-
From: Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager4o,�,//-
I
Subject: Claim from Pacific Park Apart s at 23231 Highway 99
The building manager of the subject apartment complex submitted plans May 1, 2001, to install
carports at the subject site. Part of their package included a site plan that included the carport
locations. The original site plan was unreadable and we asked the applicant to resubmit a site
plan and to be sure they showed all the utilities. During the review process Public Works
advised us they had a public water and sewer main that ran through the site and they did not want
the contractor to construct the carports over those utilities. We noted on the drawings, " posts
shall not be placed over any utilities".
May 25, 2001 the permit was issued.
On June 4, 2001, Public Works received a call to locate utilities at the subgect site. Jim Waite of
Public Works called the contractor and told him not to construct the carports because the City
has utilities in the area and he had not seen the drawings. The contractor stated he had not seen
the drawings either.
Construction started some time after the June 4, 2001.
On June 8, 2001 revised footing plans were submitted to the Building Department for a smaller
spread footing. One of the posts was positioned right over the water main and the contractor
could not achieve the proper depth. Since the Building Department was unaware of
Engineering's requirement not to construct over the utilities, they approved the smaller footing.
At no time was the contractor given a variance to construct the carports over the
watermain. The contractor proceeded to construct the new footing.
On June 11, 2001 Public Works and Engineering were advised the carports had been constructed.
A field inspection was conducted and based on that inspection, it was determined that the
contractor bad contructed carports over the public utilities at 3 different sites.
City of Edmonds
June 14, 2001; A stop work was issued by the Building Department. The contractor was advised
to remove the carports that were built within the utility easement and over the utilities.
The City Engineering Division talked to the Apartment Manager and the contractor numerous
times over the phone and informed both of them why the carports had to be relocated. We
pointed out to them the drawings indicated they were not to construct over the utilities. The
contractor indicated they were given approval by the Building Department because they received
approval of the smaller spread footer. I explained to both parties, the Building Department only
approved the design and not the installation location with regard to utilities.
July 25, 2001; Engineering staff and Public Works Sewer Department met with the contractor
and the apartment manager on site to discuss the problem and what could be done to resolve the
issue. We told the manager and contractor again the carports could not be located within the
utility easement because the Public Works crews would not be able to repair/replace any of the
line without damaging the carport. We restated the issue about the note on the drawing not to
construct over the utilities. During our meeting I noticed that some of the electrical work had
been completed since the stop work order had been issued on the specific carports.
September 21, 2001; City staff met the with contractor and apartment manager to discuss the
options to resolve the issue. The options were:
1. Relocate carport
2. Transfer ownership of the utilities: Installation of commerical double detector check
assemblies would be required to protect the public main. Potential cost $20,000.
3. Relocate utilities away from the carports.
4. Excute written agreement that the apartments would pay for any relocation or
damage to carport if the City had to work on the utilities.
We advised the representatives that option 4 was not really an option to us. They stated they
would get back to us on their decision.
Apartment Manager decided to relocate the carports and submitted drawings that indicated the
relocation of those carports in question. The resubmittal was approved.
Hefterskpadfio-park dalm.doc
MEMORANDUM
Date: 21 March, 2002
To: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Via: Dave Gebert, City Engineero-3/2-2-
From: Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manage
Subject: Claim from Pacific Park Apartments at 23231 Highway 99
The building manager of the subject apartment complex submitted plans May 1, 200 1, to install
carports at the subject site. Part of their package included a site plan that included the carport
locations. The original site plan was unreadable and we asked the applicant to resubmit a site
plan and to be sure they showed all the utilities. During the review process Public Works
advised us they had a public water and sewer main that ran through the site and they did not want
the contractor to construct the carports over those utilities. We noted on the drawings, " posts
shall not be placed over any utilities".
May 25, 2001 the permit was issued.
On June 4, 2001, Public Works received a call to locate utilities at the subject site. Jim Waite of
Public Works called the contractor and told him not to construct the carports because the City
has utilities in the area and he had not seen the drawings. The contractor stated he had not seen
the drawings either.
Construction started some time after the June 4, 2001.
On June 8, 2001 revised footing plans were submitted to the Building Department for a smaller
spread footing. One of the posts was positioned right over the water main and the contractor
could not achieve the proper depth. Since the Building Department was unaware of
Engineering's requirement not to construct over the utilities, they approved the smaller footing.
At no time was the contractor given a variance to construct the carports over the
watermain. The contractor proceeded to construct the new footing.
On June 11, 2001 Public Works and Engineering were advised the carports had been constructed.
A field inspection was conducted and based on that inspection, it was determined that the
contractor had contructed carports over the public utilities at 3 different sites.
City of Edmonds
June 14, 2001; A stop work was issued by the Building Department. The contractor was advised
to remove the carports that were built within the utility easement and over the utilities.
The City Engineering Division talked to the Apartment Manager and the contractor numerous
times over the phone and informed both of them why the carports had to be relocated. We
pointed out to them the drawings indicated they were not to construct over the utilities. The
contractor indicated they were given approval by the Building Department because they received
approval of the smaller spread footer. I explained to both parties, the Building Department only
approved the design and not the installation location with regard to utilities.
July 25, 2001; Engineering staff and Public Works Sewer Department met with the contractor
and the apartment manager on site to discuss the -problem and what could be done to resolve the
issue. We told the manager and contractor again the carports could not be located within the
utility easement because the Public Works crews would not be able to repair/replace any of the
line without damaging the carport. We restated the issue about the note on the drawing not to
construct over the utilities. During our meeting I noticed that some of the electrical work bad
been completed since the stop work order had been issued on the specific carports.
September 21, 2001; City staff met the with contractor and apartment manager to discuss the
options to resolve the issue. The options were:
I . Relocate carport
2. Transfer ownership of the utilities: Installation of commerical double detector check
assemblies would be required to protect the public main. Potential cost $20,000.
3. Relocate utilities away from the carports.
4. Excute written agreement that the apartments would pay for any relocation or
damage to carport if the City had to work on the utilities.
We advised the representatives that option 4 was not really an option to us. They stated they
would get back to us on their decision.
Apartment Manager decided to relocate the carports and submitted drawings that indicated the
relocation of those carports in question. The resubmittal was approved.
Hetters1pacific-park daindoc
1, -s i , 5�
7
E
PINNACLE
An American Management Services Company
July 16, 2003
SENT VIA FACSIMILE AND
OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
(425) 672-5750
Mr. David K. Gebert, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Edmonds
121 5h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Pinnacle
Pier 70
2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 200
Seattle, Washington 98121
Phone 206-215-9700, 'Fax 206-215-9777
W Q_
RECEIVED
JUL I ? 2003
,-NGINEERING DIVISION
Re: Pacific Park Apartments at 23231 Highway 99 ("Apartment")
Tax Parcel No. 0057-670-000-1806
Dear Mr. Gebert:
This letter will confirm the terms of our settlement agreement regarding the
current dispute with the City of Edmonds, the Pacific Park Apartments and Pinnacle
Realty Management Company ("Pinnacle").
The Apartment, its ownership group and Pinnacle agree to execute a full release
of all claims they may have against the City as of this date in exchange for a mutual
release of all current claims the City may have against the Apartment, its ownership and
Pinnacle.
According to your letter of July l't and your voice mail message to me today,
upon the receipt of this letter today, the City will halt all collections actions against the
property and the parties will work towards entering a final settlement document within
the next several days.
Please contact me or have a representative from the City Attorney's Office
contact me directly so we may draft the final documents. If you prefer, I can send to you
a simple Mutual Release for your review. I may be reached at (206) 215-9874 or we can
exchange e-mail versions of the final documents if that will facilitate the process. My e-
mail address is dkrull@prmc.com.
0
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
David J. Krull
General Counsel
Pinnacle Realty Management Company.
Cc: Craig Dwyer
0 0
40 C. 1 SWO
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771 -0m - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwd.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building 9 Engineering
June 20, 2003
Craig Dwyer
Pacific Park Apartments, LLC
2707 Colby Avenue, Suite 1201
Everett, WA 98201
RE: Civil Fines
Dear Mr. Dwyer:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
I was contacted by a Mr. Jonathan McQuade, of Pinnacle Realty, on June 13, 2003 regarding the
civil fines accumulated to date regarding the carports that were constructed at 23231 Highway 99,
Edmonds. I offered a proposed settlement agreement to resolve the outstanding fines by, -Which
both parties walk away from any claims against each other. Mr. McQuade said he would relay
the offer and subsequently called me back on June 18, 2003 and said my offer was rejected and
suggested two other alternatives which were completely unacceptable to the City.
Therefore the City of Edmonds intends to turn this matter over for collection on June 27, 2003. A
copy of the original Notice of Violation is enclosed. Please note that since you failed to appeal
the notice of violation, there is no litigation recourse available to you. Further, once the matter is
turned over to collections, the amount due is collected at a rate of 150% of fines owed pursuant to
RCW 19.16.500.
I strongly suggest that my offer to resolve -this matter be reconsidered. I will be leaving on an
extended vacation starting June 25, 2003. Dave Gebert, City Engineer has been designated to
handle this matter in my absence.
Sinceri
ly,
Duane V. Bowman
Development Services Director
CC: Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Mark Bucklin
J. Robert Smith
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
David Gebert, City Engineer
'-', C. 18 913
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
June 4, 2003
Mr. J. Robert Smith
Stanislaw Ashbaugh, LLP
701 Fifth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104-7012
RE: Pacific Park Apartments @ 23231 Highway 99
Dear Mr. Smith:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
In reply to your letter dated May 30, 2003, please refer to copies of the enclosed
Notice(s) of Civil Violation(s) issued on June 12, 2002 for the carport violations at the
subject property. The corrective action on the Notice required that final project 4pproval
be granted which as you know, occurred on April 23, 2003 (the day the carports were
removed). Thus, pursuant to the Notices, fines were assessed at $100.00 for each carport
for 298 days (298 days x $100 fine per day x 3 carports = $89,400.00).
In response to the reference of Mr. Gebert's letters, I note that none of the letters rescind,
suspend or stay the penalties imposed by the Notices of June 12, 2002.
The City desires to meet with Mr. Dwyer and his representatives in this matter to reach
an equitable agreement and resolution. Please contact my office to schedule for a
mutually agreeable day and time to meet and discuss this matter.
/I
Sinct2r'ely,
Duane V. Bowman
Director Development Services
0 [nrnrnnrntPr4 Aiinii-zt 7 1 iRgn *
STRNISLRW H�;H8HUUH jVax:2U6,�44r4uu riay Vr 0 iD-Do
7D
RECEIVE-1
BUILDING DEPT.
STANISLAW -ASHBAUGH, LLP
mmil Yaddre"
1. Robert Sm Ith r0bS@iftisIsw-a9hb3VtftCM
A7TORNEY May 30 2003
VIA FACSEWLE AND
FIRST- CLASS MAIL
-Ms. Jewinin
c.L. Graf
city of Edmonds
121 . 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Pacific Park Apartments
23231 Highway 99
Edmondr-7 Washineon:
Dear Ms. Graf-.
This law firm represents Pacific: Park Apartnentsi LLC. We are in receipt of your-,lefter.
'dated May 12, 2003, to Mr. Craig Dwyer. Apparently, there is either confusion on the pall.of the
City of Edmondsq or the City is attempting to unlawfully harass and extort money from Pacific
Park.
First, neither Mr. Dwyer or Pacific Park are.aware that civil penalties in the amount of
$89,400 have accumulated against Pacific Park Apartments for enforcement action taken on the
carport issue. Rather, the information pTovided to W Dwyer and Pacific Park by the City
expressly stated that removal of the carports needed to occur before April 5, 2003, not July 12,.
.2002 as your letter suggests.
For example, in a letter from David Gebert dated January 6, 2003 to Pacific P&k
Apartments (attached hereto), it was the City's position that no fines had yet accrued.
Specifically, Mr. Gebert stated:
uilding Division, you renewed two building
According to the R
permits in May, 2002, fdr. the purpose of relocating the three
c nstiuctetl over City utibty easements. Based
carports that were o
4400 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER ..,"I FIFTH AVENUE - SEArrLE WA 98104-7012
T 40111S, 70W www'slanislaw
-ashbaugh.com
9
STRNISLRW HbHbHUbH aX: 2Ut,�4!4 (4uu I'Idg DWID i-).00
Ms..Jeanninc L. Graf
Nitty 30, 2003
Page 2
on a current site visit, the three carports have not yet been
removed.
�q:.. P
Ms letter is to inform-yoU Ihat if the three carports arc not
removed from the City's utiUty easement by February 15, 2003, a
Notice toCoff, ectwill be Wued and if required, a Notice of
Violation to follow.. We do notwi0h to go to such lengths;
however, this situation ca�nat. wn�nue. Please take appropriate
action to rcmove the three:carpo m by February 15, 2003.
en
The letter said nothing about accumulated fines that you now in tion. In fact, this letter
indicates just the opposite; that the carpotU niust be removed byFebruary 15,2003 or, a N666i:
-my to yom, letter, the City admits that a No&x -of VioMoii-hais
Violation will follow. Thus, conti n
not even been issued and would not be in'Ued until sometime after February 15, 2003.
Remarkably, you were even copied on fts letter.
Apparently, an Order to Correct Violation was issued on February 19, 2003. Ho
the dcadlinc for completion of the correotivt� action was extended.to April 5, 2003. This W4
AS.
confumed in a letter. from Mr. Gebert to Craig Dwyer, dated March 5, 2003 (attached h
Mr. Gebert's letter stated:
Based upon the fact that on.March 4, 2003 you applied for your
demolition permit to r=ovc the carports and provided written
assurance (your e-mail to Marie Harrison on March 4, 2003) that
you will complete the removal of the carports by April 5, 2003, the
deadline for completion of the..corrective action required by the,
Order to Correct Violation issuea on February 19, 2003 is hereby
extended to 5:00 PM April 5, 2003.
Agzin, there was no reference to accimulatod fines since July 1 Z, 2002. Instoad, tho only
reference to a violation was the Order to:'Coffect Violation issued in February 2003. And the
deadline for correction was not until Apfil S. 2003. Notably, you were also copied on thia letter.
Consequently, we fail to understand your. position that fines'havc been accruing since July 2002..
It seems to us that your letter is nofl�ing-but a retaliation letter sent in response to my
letter to Dave Geberrt on April 8, 2003 oWining our position that the City is liable -for the wgt-of-
removing and relocation the carports. I W it hard to believe that the City would sit on actniin
9
fines for neulv a v6ar without savini? a word to the ncrson le;!edlv owine that much money.
especially in light of the letters from Mr. Gebert. I am sure a jury will likewise be skeptical of -
the City's position, and in fact will likely be angered by the City's conduct in this matter..:.
STRNISLRW HSHbHUI,:)H 0 aX:2Ub,�44(4UU
ridy 3U 0 0 ij.j,:) r. Q44
Ms. Jeannine L. Graf
May 30, 2003
Page 3
'Finally, if it remains the City's intention to refer these alleged fines to collection, we will
be left with no alternative but to take all necessary steps to vigorously defend agaiinst such acd66..:
Please let me know the City's intention on this issue.
Very truly yours,
stknislaw Ashbaugh, uY
J. rt Smith
JRS:lr
Endlosures
C: Craig Dwycr
Mark R. BuOdin
X-.\CLIENT%57726\6656\LTR GRAFOIDOC
STRNISLRW RSHHHUbH *aX:2Ub,544(4UU
riay )v 0") 1 D - D'j
r. V-)
:1 Ali C'. 1 %4 1
Jmiary 6, 2003
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 STH AVENUE NORTH -EDMONDS. WAN= - (425)771-0220 -FAX (42S)77i-02.21
Wabsite; www.d.edmoondsma,us
DEVELOPMENT SERVItES DEPARTMENT
PlannIng - BuIlding - Enolneedng
gusan-14arritt
Pacific Park Apartments, LLC
23231 Highway 99
Eftonds, WA 98026
RE: Relocation of Carvorts — P2ciric ParkAvartments at 23231 Hiebwav 99
Dear Ms. Harri'tt,
GARY HAAkIEV-0'.
According to the Building Division, yca renew�d.two building penuits in May, 2002,-fbr.:..th
purpose of relocating the three carports that Were constructed over City utility eas=ents. Based
on a current site visit, the three carports have not yet been removed.
The c'arport6 need to be removed soon to ensure access to the utilities in. the event needed.. This
letter is to inform you that if the three carports are not removed from the City'sutility easemerit
by February 15, 2003, a Notice to Correct will be issued and if required, a Notice of Violation * to
fbllow. We do not wish to go to such lengths; howovcr, this situation cannot continue.' 1tease
tAe the appropriate action to remove the three carports by February 15, 2003.
If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1324.
;Sincer
AViID YK GFD]EERT. PJEE.
City Engineer
DKG/ALC/mnc
c: Jim Waite, Water/Sewer Division Manager
Jei=ine Gra4 Building Official
11., 18
mwVW.6ft 0 9()
ncor
�;IHNIbLHW K)HbHU.0M 4WaX.ZU0,)414r4UU Mdq DU w IQ-vv UQ
MAY-27-03 TUE 12:54 PM PINNACLE REALTY NW FAX NO, 2062330331
P. 02
I, :,
GARY HWENSOW'.
CITY OF EDMONDS
i�i 3'rwAVENUE N011114 COMONW.VVAMM, (42S) 771.= - FAX (4,Uj 7714221
C4.formong; W4 U:
ICES MPAMAGNT
DEVELOPMCNT SM
Bitildifig - Enginwirig
Piviiing
M aTC11 5, 2 003
Mr. Craig Dwyer
Sunior Tnvcstment Manager
2R01 Alasktui Wuy, Suitc 200
Soralle. WA 98121
UK, Order to Correct Violation, Pselfie*Fark Apartment Carport.;
Dmr*Mr. Divyer:
Based upon (he ract that on March 4'j 2003 you applied for your demolition pamil to
n
rcirove the carports and providod wnitica-umatice (your e-mail to.Mario Harriw on.
March 4, 2003) thel you wl�ll wnipleto the removal of the carporu by April 512003, tl�c.
dmidlino rur compictimi of oic corrcctTvc action required by the Order to Correct
Vltil:ition issued on February 19, 2003 is hereby extended 10 5-00 PM April 5, 2003.
i r you havc any questions, pleasc don't hcsitale to call Lyle Chrisman or me at 42S 771
0220.
Sincere!1yy
11) 9. (WINKRT, jrK
City Enginccr
Cc
kinaine Oraf, rhffldinx Official -
Lyle Chrixnw. Engineering PrognmMifuger
Incory. 90
0
0
April 23, 2003
MEMO TO STREET FILE
Pacific Park Apartments
23231 Highway 99
SUBJECT: Carport Demolition — Permit Ws 2003-0181, 2003-0182, 2003-0183
The Engineering Division verified removal of the carport footings and backfill with rock on
4/4/2003, 4/7/2003 and 4/8/2003. Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager, received a
phone call from a lady affiliated with the Pacific Park Apartments a few days following
inspection, stating that a water line had been hit during removal of the footings. No further
phone calls or inspection requests were received regarding repair of a water line.
A final Engineering inspection was performed April 23, 2003. At that time most of the asphalt
patches were a little raised and there did not appear to be any soft spots.
410)
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Technician Date
r
I
STANISLAW -ASHBAUGH, LLP
Robert Smith
ATTORNEY
CERTIFIED MAIL
RE -TURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
City of Edmonds
121 - 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
April 8, 2003
Re: Parking Structures at Paciflc Park Apartments
Dear Mr. Gebert:
RECEIVED
APR '1 0 .2003
E-NGINEERNG DIVISION
email address
robs@stanislaw-ashbaugh.coni
cop.,
This law firm represents Pacific Park Apartments in connection with its dispute with the
City of Edmonds over the location of certain carports at Pacific Park.
As you know, Pacific Park constructed several carports on its property after receiving
approval from the City. Nevertheless, despite the City's approval of the plans and despite the
carports being built in accordance with the plans, the City now demands that some of these
carports be torn down and relocated. The purported reason for the City's demand is that the
carports were built over the City's water utility easement.
It is undisputed that throughout the planning process and construction of the carports the
City was well aware of the location of the carports and the utilities, yet said nothing to Pacific
Park. It was only after construction of the carports was completed that the City decided to raise
an objection. The City's silence regarding the location of the carports and utilities, coupled with
its approval of the plans showing the locations of the carports (overthe utilities) and the various
on -site inspections that allowed construction to go forward, caused Pacific Park to reasonably
rely on the approved plans and the City inspectors to build the carports.
Remarkably, rather than owning up to its mistakes, the City is trying to force Pacific Park
to shoulder all the costs related to relocating the carports. Even more remarkable is that the City
4400 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER - 70 1 FIFTH AVENUE - SE,:17 LE WA 98104-7017,
TELEPHONE 206-386-5900 - FAX 206-344-7400 - www.stanisfakv-ashbaugh.com
0
April 8, 2003
Page 2
threatened to fine Pacific Park $100 per day unless the carports were removed. Because of the
City's demands and threats, Pacific Park has been forced to remove the carports at a substantial
cost. Unfortunately for the City, it is the one that is responsible for these costs and all damages
suffered by Pacific Park.
The City's action in approving Pacific Park's construction plans was a land use decision,
under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA). Thus, if the City mistakenly approved the plans, then
the City's exclusive recourse was to follow the procedures outlined in that Act. Unfortunately
for the City, the time has long since elapsed for it to challenge the location of carports. See
Chelan County v. Nykriem, 146 Wn.2d 904 (2002) (holding that an allegedly void building
permit, if not timely challenged under LUPA, will be deemed valid).
Therefore, pursuant to the decision in Nykriem, the carports Were validly constructed.
The City's action in forcing Pacific Park to demolish the carports amounts to a governmental
taking. We, therefore, demand compensation and other damages related to their removal.
Be advised that we will take all necessary steps to vindicate Pacific Park's rights through
litigation and will hold the City liable for all costs associated with the removal and relocation of
the carports. We will also be seeking lost rent during the time Pacific Park was unable to charge
tenants for those spaces. At this point, the City is liable to Pacific Park in excess of $70,000.
Pacific Park, however, is willing to discuss an alternative resolution to this matter as such
discussions may be in the best interests of all concerned. Please contact me within five (5) days
of your receipt of this letter. If I do not hear from you, I will assume the City prefers to have this
matter litigated and we will proceed accordingly.
Very truly yours,
Stanislaw Ashbaugh, LLP
Sent unsigned to avoid delay
J. Robert Smith
JRS:Ir
X:\CLIENT\57726\6656\LTRCity0l.doc
00,_.
0
0
;f)o_jL -f-
I —�— iz�
PC. 189
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
March 5, 2003
Mr. Craig Dwyer
Senior Investment Manager
2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98121
RE: Order to Correct Violation, Pacific Park Apartment Carports
Dear Mr. Dwyer:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
Based upon the fact that on March 4, 2003 you applied for your demolition permit to
remove the carports and provided written assurance (your e-mail to Marie Harrison on
March 4, 2003) that you will complete the removal of the carports by April 5, 2003, the
deadline for completion of the corrective action required by the Order to Correct
Violation issued on February 19, 2003 is hereby extended to 5:00 PM April 5, 2003..
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call Lyle Chrisman or me at 425 771
0220.
Sincerel
ID K. GLEBERT, PE
City Engineer
Cc: ' Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Program Manager
Incorporated August 11, 1890
C;�4 1-;+., W-1,; T.—
CITY OF EDMONDS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
(425) 771-0220
ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION
Location of Violation (Address and Tax Account Parcel No) -
Pacific Park Apartment CWorts 0 23231 Highway 99, Building A,C and D, Edmonds, WA 98026
Tax Account Parcel No. 0057-670-000-1806
Issued To: Craig DMLer, Propegy Owner
Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 401 2nd Avenue South, Suite I 10 Seattle, Washinglon
98104
Code Section Violated:. Unifonn Building Code Sections 106,108 & 109.
Description of Violation: The property owner obtained building pennits to construct cnorts on the
subject prope!ly (pennit reference #2001-0401, #2001,0400, 2001-0399). The owner/contractor failed
to follow approved plans and constructed the cgMorts over a City utilily easement. The property owner
was informed June 14, 2001 that the carports encroached over the Cijy easement but owner continued
work in disregard of this notification. A letter was sent by the Cily Engineer on January 6. 2003 that
reguired removal of the three cgMorts by FebruM 15, 2003. As of the date of this Order the c@Morts
have not been removed and no demolition permit(s) have been obtained for removal.
Corrective Action Required: Obtain the required demolition pennits for removal. of the three cnorts
and remove structures from site.
Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm (time) March 5,2003 -(date)
If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, *a Notice of
Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of
$100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues.
Date Posted:
Issuing Party.
Signature
Date Mailed: FebruM 19, 2003 Date Served
Title Cily Engineer
6T" O's
�1.0 C. 189 \3
January 6, 2003
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmonclsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
Susan Harritt
Pacific Park Apartments, LLC
23231 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
RE: Relocation of Carports - Pacific Park Apartments at72-32-- 3-1 Highway 99 -7
Dear Ms. Harn*tt,
According to the Building Division, you renewed two building permits in May, 2002, for the
purpose of relocating the three carports that were constructed over City utility easements. Based
on a current site visit, the three carports have not yet been removed. -
The carports need to be removed soon to ensure access to the utilities in the event needed. This
letter is to inform you that if the three carports are not removed from the City's utility easement
by February 15, 2003, a Notice to Correct will be issued and if required, a Notice of Violation to
follow. We do not wish to go to such lengths; however, this situation cannot continue. Please
take the appropriate action to remove the three carports by February 15, 2003.
If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1324.
Sinceroyl.,
AVID IC GEBERT. P.E.
City Engineer
DKG/ALC/cmc
c: Jim Waite, WateT/Sewer Division Manager
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
VAlettenWanitt-caMon removal.doc Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
�t-1 C. 1 sq"
July 25, 2001
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
Susan Harritt
Pacific Park Apartments, LLC
23231 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
RE: Relocation of Carports — Pacific Park Apartments at 23231 Highway 99
Dear Ms. Harritt,
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
'� r, ritc
We appreciate the time you took to meet with Engineering and Public Works personnel to
discuss the problems and issues with the placement of carports over City -maintained utilities. As
Lyle Chrisman from the Engineering Division discussed with you and your contractor, the
drawings and building permit specified the carport posts were not to have been installed over the
utilities. In addition, prior to start of construction, the Public Works Department representative
told your contractor that the carports were not to be installed over the utilities or easement. Since
our Public Works crews must have access to their utility lines for maintenance, the carports will
have to be relocated to areas where no utility easements exist.
Please take the appropriate action to relocate the three affected carports by August 17, 2001. In
addition, a revised site plan must be submitted for approval. Be sure to show any and all utility
locations around the new sites. We will expedite our review so this work can be done
expeditiously. Once the resubmittals have been approved, your contractor will need to call for
all required inspections.
If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1324.
Sincerely,
:A�
DAVID K GEBERT, P.E.
City Engineer
DKG/ALC/cmc
c: Jim Waite, Water/Sewer Division Manager
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
DAMy Docutmnts\Engscc\DEVELOP\LyIeWtcrs\Harritt.dDc* Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
.1 17 C. 1 S9,11
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
STREPADDRESS FILE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - 7110 - 210TH ST. S.W. - EDMONDS, WA 98026
(425) 771-0235 - FAX (425) 744-6057 - E-MAIL: kIein@ci.edmonds.wa.us
WEB SITE: wwwxi.edmondsma.us
January 10, 2000
Manager, Pacific Park Apartments
23231 - Hwy 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
Re: Pollutant Discharge into Storm System
Dear Manager:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
A water quality discharge problem was brought to my attention on January 4, 2000.
Storm maintenance crews observed a significant amount of an oily substance in a catch
basin on 77 1h Ave. during routine maintenance. This residue was traced back through the
drainage system and found to originate from a trash storage area in the east parking area
of the apartments. This storm drain system flows directly into Lake Ballinger. The
system is intended for storm runoff only and the water receives no treatment downstream.
This means that fish and wildlife habitat are impacted by any pollutant discharges.
The discharge of untreated waste into the water of the State constitutes a violation of
RCW 90.48.080 of Washington State Pollution Control Law and could be subject to
enforcement action which includes significant monetary fines. However, at this time we
would only like to solicit your cooperation in cleaning this area up and taking appropriate
actions to insure any pollutants are properly contained and disposed of. We request that
this situation be corrected as soon as possible. Maintenance crews will be re -inspecting
this system within two weeks.
If you have any questions regarding this letter please feel free to contact me at
425-771-0235 ext. 648.
Sincerely,
'�Irn Kammerer
Street/Storm Manager
cc: Public Works Director
Storm Lead
Word ata\Street\PacificPark
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
0
Date:
From:
MEMO FOR RECORD
Feburary 15, 2000
Jim Kammerer
Street/Storm Manager
Subject: Storm Water Pollution at Pacific Park Apartments, 23231-SR99,
Edmonds, WA
During routine maintenance Storm Division crews discovered an oily substance
in a catch basin on 77' Ave. which was traced to a trash storage area at the
apartment complex. Attempts to contact the manager were unsucessful, so a
letter was sent out on January 1 Ot' informing them of the problem.
I was contacted on January 14 by the Pacific Park maintenance person (Bill) who
insured me the area would be cleaned up by the 18t'.
A follow-up inspection by the Storm lead on January 25 showed the area had
indeed been cleaned up with no additional pollutants leaching into the storm
water system.
i%
,ATE RECEIVED
�w
E M
P R IT EXPIRES
USE PERMIT
CITY, OFEDIVIONDS
ZONE N U M B E 14: 0/
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
OYIE R NAME/NAIvlE OWINESS
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISIONi NO. LOT NO.
LID NO.
LID FEE $
=
MAILING ADDRESS
L u
z
3:
0
,�o
:_�14i
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Apprwed C3
RW Permit Required 0;
Street Use Permit Req'd C)
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
EXISTING — PROPOSED
114 0
Insp ction Required
Side.alk Required (3
15�547TZZ-;_ '5�9710)41
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT
Underground
Wiring required 0
NAM
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES 0 NO 0
3
0
uj
uj
ADDRESS
REMARKS
z
z
0
�z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
a
cc
2?4:�q
z
CITY Zlfi
EL�GONE
NAME
&k��
E NGINEERING IEWED/9ATE
ADDRESS
cc
i4ey -51441
FIRE/, EQ04W DATE
z
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
0
_57
VYIANCE OR CU
SHORELIPE�O.FQA
INSPECT
"ON
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
CHECKED BY
REO'D
PBOND
S
:21T
(:)YES &NO
r —
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN' AREA
,. HEIGHT
-j
'PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
COMPLETE EXE P
ALL.OWEDPROPOSED
ALLOW . ED PROPOSED
W
_j
EXP
NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOSED
UIAED SETB I ACKS (FT.)
ONT SIDE REAR
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) -
FRONT
URSIDE REAR
Ej COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR
ADDITION
— %1
z
CHANGE OF USE
f-1 REMODEL APARTMENT SIGN
z
5
IL
PARKINf2 VTAEA PLANNI REVIEWED . BY DATI
RE
E] FENCE
REPAIR E] GRADING CYDS X FT)
AR
DEMOLISH TANK OTHER
ROETAINING WALL RENEWAL
R CKERY
z
(TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
P:
CHECKEDBY
TYPE OF QONST4CTION
OCCUPANT
Q.
ICO
GROUP
(A
NUMBER
N�UMBEROF
C IC
IAL INPP�CTOR AREA
OCCUPANT
OF . I
DWELLING
I
A S
17—451
o
STORIES
UNITS
N E
-
ES
IRED ;ky
i LOAD
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE e,7a -1,fl;7ff 1
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC.108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D
z
6
57
A Aj pt
T9Z
VALUATION
FEE
-71 sol:r
'PLAN CHECK FEE
Z
HEAT SY)URCE GJAZING % SLO % BUILDING q
7'
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
D DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKSj DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
2150
STATE SURCHA
PERMIT APPLICATION:. 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS -&Q�REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
"APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fwc� NSPECTION FEE
W IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
j LANDSCAPING
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE
cc
, ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
x FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
DEEMEDTO MODIFY, WAIVEOR REDUCEANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAYTHE CITY'SABILITYTO ENFORCE ANYORDINARCE PROVISION.-
X1 R CEIPT�
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT � HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signedby the
TION, AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Otficial or 4is/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
qION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
I WORKMEN'S ��EN�
OFFIC I N DATE
SIG4NATURAGENT) DATE S G ED (425)
771-0220
R&ELED BY, 15ATE
ATTENT EXT 1333
T7�
IT IS I INLA'i Fill TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
0 1 DATE RECEIVED
-.0 �// /0 / "I PERMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE PERMIT
ZONE 60 NUMBER44V- c/) 4W
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
0 ER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
L M
U
MAILING ADDRESS
�o r-�c WjyCC,- k,157 Ae�
LID FEE $
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
EXISTING PROPOSED
REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT
TESCP Approved 0
RW Permit Required 0
Street Use Permit Rsq'd E]
Inspection Required 0
Sidewalk Required 0
Underground
Wiring required
CITY ZIP
W 72z;
[TELE PHONE
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES 0 NO 0
LU
ADDRESS
�7'
REMARKS
OWNEWCONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
z
leAwIft75
CITY ONE
7y,
f
I4*q
7
%,tNGINEERING VIEWED/90E/
2
TELEPHONE
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
NEW
RESIDENTIAL
PLUMBING / MECH
ADDITION
0 COMMERCIAL
o
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
REMODEL
APARTMENT
SIGN
REPAIR
GRADING-
0
FENCE
CYDS
X
DEMOLISH
0 TANK
OTHER
ICA GARArF
RETAINING WALL
ROCKERY
0
RENEWAL
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
—I
NUMBER
NUMBER OF
7:;�
CRITIC
F
)
.
DWELLING
1
AREAS
STORIES'
UNITS
NUMB
-0
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE .
HEAT S)DURCE GLAZI,NJS % I %,
— &6�he I tVvf--4�
W DATE
.FIR
C wwj-4
VfRIA.NCE OR C SHORELINE O%gfi�.-/
INSPECTION
BOND
BY
200—Of
REOX'D
0 YES No
IPOSTED
SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA
COMPLET E EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED
HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
,
EXP
LOT COVERAGE REQUI ETBACKS,(FT.)
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
ALLOWED PROPOSED FR SIDE REAR
FRONT 1 UR SIDE REAR
PARKING
ARE PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
It
REO-D I PROVIDED
t-�
r/- IL
11 f LL 0(j< , 51/pll
FT) I REM5&S Al
CHEAED BY TYPE r()NSTRUCTION cow OCCUPANT
GROUP
SPECIAL IN PVTOR JAREA OCCUPANT
Q
TFR E YES �LOAD
'i U'
R R
EMARKS
P p OC
ROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UB,C 10.8/FINAL INSPECTION REWD
VALUATION FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
BUILDING
PLAN CHECK NO:
PLUMBING
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
:5
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
5
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
STATE SURCHARGE
W
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
"APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
W
i
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
LANDSCAPING
2
cc
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
INSPECTION FEE
4
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY.
x
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
RECEIPT
a
-j
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAYTHE CITY'SABILITY TO ENFORCE ANYORDINANCE PROVISIOW"
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT;AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION: AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE L_AQOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S AND RCW 18.27.
=E=IPIIISURANCE
(425
OFFICAPSIPATU DATE
I
SIGNATUR
DATE SIG ED?/
771-0212 0
RELEASED BY [YATE
ATTENTIOK
EXT 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE.OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
A FINAL. INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109-
ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - I
FAX
PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
�PATE RECEIVED
ON
CITY OF EDM DS
CONSTRUCTION PERMITAPPLI CATION
OWNR NAME/NAME OF BUVESS
( 447
k
L cc MAILING ADDRES
U s
/00
0
CITY ZI ELEPHONE
7 0 2. /J-- 2-
eINAIVII:
Uj
ADDRESS, I v"
A" n(-1
PERMIT EXPIRES
PERMIT
N U M B E R
SUITEJAPTI
ME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO!
LID NO.
6
I
LID FEE $
1IGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Apprwed
RW Permit Required
0
C]
0
Street Use Permit Req'd
0
PROPOSED
Inspect on Required
0
Sidewa:k Required
0
ED DEDICATION—
FT
Underground
Wiring required
0
31ZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES 0 NO 0
:ONTRA&O� RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
IJU
z
z
ING 1, R�VIEWED/DATE
1W'5'
cc ADDRESS
FQE�VIE;*B D AT7
U)
ZIP TEL
CITY EPHO
z 151 LL
0 CIA 4 L
0 A9A 4d W IfF RIANCE 0 SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHE KED BY . p REQ'D POSTED
;�IU 0 YES
3-Ir-04 SERA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. b?V 000 COMPLETE I EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED ED
P"OPOS
W
'mg
k Vo /4? 494 EXP
NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
ALLOWED PROPOSED FR T SIDE REAR FRONT URSIDE REAR
COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR - ------- z
ADDITION z .
CHANGE OF USE z
PARKING L T EA PLANNINGBEVIEWED BY DATE
r
0-,-REMODEL APARTMENT 0 SIGN REO'D I PROWD
GRADING FENCE L5 bl,
M REPA 0 CYDS 1:1 X FT) RE KS
f—] DEMOLISH 0 OTHER.
TANK
RETAINING WALL 0 RENEWAL
ROCKERY
r- (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CKED BY TYPI�O�FONSTR!JfTION cong OCCUPANT
-W
A GROUP
(A Ui'
uu NUMBE4 NUMBER OF CRIT11
a WELLING AREA
W OF OCCUPANT
o STORIES NITS NUM REQUIREIDINWy'ES Im -710:5yr-T- LOAD
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ!b
_j
71--
4b f4�4)0_�
(01 7
-PA)) up V67 7 7 -2 1
N9
!VALUAT ION FEE
S�?
PLAN CHECK FEE
H�J_ GLA41NG % LOT SLOPE )az.
.2 BUILDING
0: VESTED DATE
PLAN CAECK 1PLUMBi.N6
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WOIR�'TO
t E DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
B
DOMAIN (CURBS. SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRA.DING/FILL
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
ILI PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS - STATE SURCHARGE
PERMIT LIMIT* I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF'PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
"APPLICANT. ON ENG. INSPECTION FEE
BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Lu IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY� DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE LANDSCAPING
_j CITY OF
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFI61ALS,:EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE
cc ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF-W V-gg"�ATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
x FROM THE ISSUANCE OF TO PiRlullt..�. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RE7T -74
01 DEEMED To MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 74/
_j
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAYTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION..
x R CEIPT —
TOTAL AMOUNT I
I?K //
)UE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION . receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S COMPEN��N INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFIC AT DATE
DATE SIG
SIGNATUREA OR ENT NE
(425) (L
V
-0220 RELEA�FD BY DATE
7 771
A17ENTIOV EXT/333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- 771-0221
ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK -OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
DATE RECEIVED
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
ER NAME/NAME OF WSINESS It
1= MAILING ADDRESS
w
z Aee Ae�7
0
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
�,19,7721,,:5-
NAj
ADDRESS
Ix
x ? &/; �; /v/
CIT) ZIP 10,'�'..TrtLE*NE
NAME
Cc ADDRESS
0
l'-
L)
Pa &7,V, 1—au
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
z
0 �,�Zlzvze,,_P 46A�V 15,�WYZ
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE I CHECIKED BY
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
NEW
RESIDENTIAL
ADDITION
COMMERCIAL
REMODEL
APARTMENT
REPAIR
E] GRADING
CYDS
DEMOLISH
TANK
RETA NING WALL
ROCKERY
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS
OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
NUMBE�R
NUMBER OF
[—]
PLUMBING / MECH
oCOMPLIANCE
OR
CHANGE OF USE
SIGN
FENCE
( X FT)
f--j
OTHER
M RENEWAL
OF DWELLING AREAS CV —
STORIES UNITS NUMBER 4VII_
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
PERMIT EXPIRES
USE PERMIT /
ZONE NUMBER-W-2,
JOB
ADDRESS
,,- %11
SUITE/APT#
6VI
PLAT NAM E/SU BDIVI SION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
LID FEE $
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Apprwed
AW Permit Required
0
0
Street Use Permit Rsq'd
0
EXISTING — PROPOSED
Inspect on Required
CI
SIde.a:k Required
0
REQUIRED DEDICATION—
FT
Underground
Wiring required
0
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
F FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES 0 NO 0
M
REMARKS
uj
z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
77
z
uj
E N (JINEERING 71t;$'12 REV
,REVIE D
DATE
uu
LL
VAR CU
SHORELINE CQaaWl._�'
INSPECTION
BOND
1000
REO'D
POSTED
0 YES XNO
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN AREA
HEIGHT
COMPLETE EXEMPT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
ALLOWED PROPOSED
EXP
I , W
LOT COVERAGE
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT,)
OPOSED SETBACKS (FT)
ALLOWED PROPOSED
FRONT SIDE REAR
R SIDE REAR
z
Z
PARKING
LOT AREA
NNING REVIEWED BY DATE
RE a IDED
I —1
f//4 AI I
CHECKEDBY ITYPEOF PJSTRUCTION CQjQE OCCUPANT
14, Q n GROUP I)/ _�
SPEC�IAL INJ;PFCTOR AREA OCCUPANT
REO IREZ YES LOAD
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
a "
VALUATION FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
-71,6 0-5 Q - . /7/
HEAT $OURCE G.LAJING % LOT SLO
/\/ - % BUILDING
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING
U I I �?_10
____
.
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DFU VEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
Q&AQAEh1FILL
t SEPARATE PERMISSION.
2
STATE SURCHARGE
M PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
Lu
IL PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
"APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
Uj IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
I
LANDSCAPING
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
INSPECTION FEE
M
et ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
T- F 0 ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
RECEIPT
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
x
I
R CE7T-
.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPF(OVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF TH R CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
receipt is acknow.%dged in space provided.
%NORKMEN'S C2$PEN I BANCE AND RCW 18.27.
OFFICIAL UR DATE
SIGNATUR OKVV 0 GENT)
DATE SlGtytD
(425)
�),
771-0220
REL SED BY
ATTENTIOW
EXT 1 �333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX
ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR
PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
DATE RECEIVED
hi [PERMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE
ZONE PERMIT
.6t NUMBER,,O,.�-tl�-IeS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB S,UITE/APT#
ADDRESS
OF B
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
_9WbLEBjAME/NAME
LID FEE $
cc
W
z
0
MAILING ADDRESS
Ab
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
EXISTING � PROPOSED
REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT
TESCP Appm;_d 0
RW Permit Required 0
Street Use Permit Req'd 0
Inspection Required C3
Sidewalk Required C1
Underground
Wiring required 0
C Y
IT ZIP
2 7 T/ &
TELEPHONE
I
F-
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES 0 NO 0
-- —
3
cc
4
ADDRESS
Z�&
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLJDRAINAGE
UJ
z
CITY ZIPLJC[TE�gIHONE
NAME
cc
cc
t-
z
0
C
INEERING REVIEWV/DATY
S A
,2�
ADDRESS
F1 E E ATE
re
W
LC
IL
CIT ZIP
5�"7w
TELEPHONE
P ARIA
SHORELINE qkaqWI,,`i`
1-000-141
INSPECTION
REO'D
oyEs XNO
I
BOND
POSTED
-
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
CHECKED BY
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN AREA
HEIGHT
W
.GL
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO
61V5 7 h7A
COMPLETE I EXEMPT
EXP
ALLOWED PROPOSED
ALLOWED . PROPOSED
NEW �ESIDENTIAL C] PLUMBING I MECH
ADDITION COMMERCIAL o COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
REMODEL APARTMENT SIGN
GRADING FENCE
f-1 REPAIR CYDS X FT)
LOT COVE A IP3 OE
ALLOWED PRO SED
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT SIDE REAR
I I !I-
PROPOSE6SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT L/R SIDE REAR
/ ,<--
y f I
z
PARKING
REO'D PROVIDED
LOT AREA
P Nl�,p REVIEWED'BY DATE
�Abl
REMARKS
DEMOLISH E] TANK OTHER
P:
0.
Ex
w
o
ROETAIERING WALL RENEWAL
R CK Y
(TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
CHECKED BY
TYPE QE-QQNARUCTION
_V., IN
OCCUPANT
GROUP
I
(A
NUMBER
OF
STORIES 1
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
UNITS
1 _6�—
CRITICAL
AREAS
1 NUMBE%,V
SPECIAL IN CTOR
REQUIREDX YES
JAREA
OCCUPANT
LOAD�
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER LIBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
-1j: 41 -Mr
VALUATION
FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
HEAT S URCE G!LAPNG % LOT SLOPE %
BUILDING
1yoroc- 41,70
:z
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE
PLUMBING
S-b
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
M DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
4RA434"/FILL
A 15
t SEPA RATE PERMISSION.
I
STATE SURCHARGE
cc
w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
it. PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENG. REVIEW FEES
.SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
GO APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
;N
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
ujj INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
LANDSCAPING
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
INSPECTION FEE
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
X1 FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
RECEIPT
a
-i DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUI REMtNT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.'
x
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
RECEIP�
7
1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
/9
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER. OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
I
TION; AND IN DOING THEZORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and F eas are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF,?19 LA�OR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S VVPENSATE�,�ANCE AND RCW 18.27.
SIGNATUR NER G NT) DATE SIG ED
L=
(425)
�NATU DATE
2A
771-0220
RE6�A�iD BY DATE
ATTE TIOW
EXT 1333
Ado �
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIF1
.A
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
IK(QPFrTrZ
FAX
PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
ta
N
-egg
"'N
93.6
24 A-V 9 9
0.0
2 S DQ A -J St
VA
1AA
&
j 9 'S
C A 8 AT i A-1 A10. 70,p
vf'Q V4 7,'0 A;
C1% it ;'Al V,,Z T
VA
JB&
IND
3A P.
;7 IR Co.., JA I
10.9
9,7 U11LITf A5 EU1
ST06UA DRA&j4&&
1_� Aj
C A Z 1 40'
V- D,':;' W-4
r,�. f-'A ',' F. -1 C1.1. lr;�.'? - :
DA, A.,,, S J 0 G 1'.-e 0
AcAA--'
0:AP S�74�
/go'
—N
/A A Af I A.VO 6",ro
0.�f:50!T'.ICALAMIF 10 rAIA�r '5*7D. PjAA1
,IP ISI jilq, , -
I - 'k Oiwi:4 /0 49
V's:/'O' I AT 1 -1451 �O/v."ry
A"M O,qfCr&y Cold 14.04014.
4-t-A Ik 0; 4
S*7_0 GAIII C49 C�
C'
A
ry
M PA rA 4.
Oa'r11,r ?'�O'f
/WiFA7 SA A4i
GA, 14 4. 8 6A. rlPk
A f I ;r p,12.4
10-iA,U wi.-,l 2.0 ir-
07/0 f�1^4 G 0 00.
0 5'
7
le A If
QET-ft-RAL NOTEI
1'. All work mistarials. shaT4 be In with O-W OtSndArdD and spvcIf4!e*"
of it -Is City of Erth 00 end "Itto. of " A~ S411119411rdil, And SpGQ1nMboM.'.
except as 1,110diftod herl"I'livhin
2.,-. it shall be the awtipsot roSpOinalbilley to secure all necessary permits, P~
to searting construction.
3* All too IS O.&j t.1 Inspection Oy the City oV Ediriandli, and d..
_T
cortzractor Shall notify the Ci their sctadul* in suf"clent time to Permit Inspection
C
PrIcle to and during dle
4 ' Th. exIntractor shall Ml#ft City of Ecinwincio-Dep.,"m of Public Wor4ta In
tima to De,,mit Wispection or "*jv:xnm se-e-s Prior to Moswilling.
5. Upon 6onVt4tion of the so Itinprovomerta; Ard'wrv%,Vreur4 utilities, the cot—
t trsc*or shall ruritish an iss-4buiWlitan, to " City of Edinonds "on Indicates that
location or all site irnprowsmert% , fMkXRrq side se-er taterals or max,* or CAPie,
pentif-6m lnllc�xiotion.
6. Th. contractioe *all *ej 'ftw�wa to finish W�diiw upon completion of finsi
road and lot 9r.,dse.
T. All co"uWad onatal pip. (C*AP) "It be aluminun,%,, 18 gauge. with HelicaL
corrugations.
0. E3*ddjVfbrCOrruq&jedrrabsjswwer stall be CIS" 0. Mkt1v%.beddirVrn&tOrW
shall rot contain stonse; tArV*r ~ 3 inch". frdZG^ rOOM, Or MOISOUre In OXCOMIN Of
that par,niCting thorough compaction.
9. Bedding and backfIll contacted to W% of maximum density, except rorwp
12 inches of the dri L " &-,bsrwft v&-I! ce cwpacto qV% of m"tff—" -ratty.
1:4001ni; end bacsirill to be 001 itiasid In *muitt—um of a- line.
to. Prepertyinwarvarstolsqui. of the tire jr191ge, System vA thin
property if -a.
11. A ' it Mnoff to be di..a`� dr&,n&;q yetqn,.
.2 The contractor shall be responisible fo the Installation of side sawer (laterals
.r; .6) and thA placing of 2-** 4 rrwLrk*rs with the length and depth of laterals and teas
inscribed on thii mar ra.
13. Upon completi of ths site Impraivamisnits; arid underground utilities. the.
COX
cf;ntractor shalt-furn h an as—uilt plan to the City of Edmonds which indicates this
location or all site i IS tnicluding side sewer laterals or teas, *or other
pertinent informati 04
14, All Sanitary wer pipes shall be r%A)ber gasket Concrete or PVC ASTM-D 3033
or 0 3OU sewer with AiIWA SpeCifiCati.onS, Section 60, unless olherwise
noted. 0' to cafTn
15. -rho contrac shall alp, st rrenrdia frames to finish grades. upon completion of
jinal road arid lot 1. . .. .:
16. All Side Se branch larAS shall be min. of 6" diameter-
17.� ClearIoutS 11 be plabid 30" f a
MAy 1 2001
�TERMIT Cour
0 A
C4