The URL can be used to link to this page

23402 75TH AVE W.PDFlill 11111111 6017 23402 75TH AVE W Owner/Applicant: Can -Am Properties, LLC 21331 Happy Valley Rd. 0 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. 40 ft. Dapirewpty Wry MM+1 A-r ?p DVgj(j-y Ljrj 7,q Stanwood, WA 98292. Scale: 1 in = 2Wt. Oin. N *This portion of Existing Contact/Contractor:' Allen Cam bell ALL biSTUP-13ED AIZCA-S SH&LL BE C6MP6ST- h*jFNr) C14 p ..1. Sol Driveway to Remain U') High Definition onstruction L5 HANJOCOV fflaC- (n LLJ CN Slope Driveway to (1'X 40' 4- ---.v 00 N LO Relocate 17114 103'd Place NE :3 LU 21 C.0 C: 0) CV) 00 Granite Falls, WA 98252 Lo Drain to this area C71 Utility Pole (1) (0 0 c- Q) < I Gravel Strip for Here c > :> 00 (360) 772-6515 Drywell/Drainage CL < :> CY) 0) :)4� 0- 109.24' Existing ------------------------- - > LO C� - 011:6 hTr -t- ---- PUD C14 CN CD _.c lArn. T ' iocrl6da VT ----- ------- ------------------ C14 IT CY) Site Address: 2340275 th Ave W., Edmonds Flow Path LL las (U p 0 0 il 0 "Ici = 1 00 = -01 " Al I C\1 Sewer Lid _0 C14 = (1) X 1 2 w 0 C Nt C D W ---------------- Tax I.D. 004888-004-008-04 0 � c' t 1 100, 2 M (0 E2 CO LL roposed _j A Proposed Asphalt 0`0 0 Gas Asphalt Apron Lot Size: 8,392 SF Driveway 6 d) -S.C- Existing Utility 0 E (780 sf) Pole (71:11R) U) 20' Construction Lot Coverage: .2 95' n Entrance Per Existing 1W I Z Detail E1.2 sphalt Apron Height Calculation: "2 ---------------- ------ Sewer Lid @ Elev. 1 A= 104 To be Vegetated Exisiing Driveway —4 C) B = 105 w/Niew Grass/ to -4;5� t cj�. ob �e remove I ------------ C:) Sod -.7 - - - - - - - C = 102.5 7 1A , >_ b 2 4-5 ZgM2. �A;" M 70 01 C C) 04 Cil D = 102.5 E W S LO C) CD Average = 103.5 15 a) At 101- 25' CID (D --- Water Vegetated 11" water line Poly ipe Path New %" rneie 'r to *Yard c1b installed —louse. 350.6 A i.e. level spreader CD 6" cleanout. Sewer 3 -+- -r - ' --- -------------------------------- 4"cleanou RJ M , Swale-�- a. 31M.5 - — - — — - - - - - — — - - - - - — - -- - - - - - e, 9.5'. r-- r See Note 9 ew Utility nit r�� 00 cc) C) >- 03 Z Lu (n 124.81' Pole Here 0 > < LAI'M st;R35 55 �WA Z016 1 kkrA :S JXMI-10N MUST 8E BY 011Y8 LID LO .%1AIG CONVicy 1_ �7 en#= I ENGINEERING DIVISION E A NOT D UPFFT F11 F RESUB (N C) 1+ u_ 0 Date: (0- 1 �91 I r-\ co MAY 0 5 2015 04 NOTES: W Lu ui 1. Downspouts to splashblocks on West %of structure and level spreader on East 1/2of structure. See Report from Western Geotechnical Consultants dated 03/16/2015. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2. Stockpiles to be covered within 24 hours. CITY OF EDMONDS. 3. Silt Fence to be installed downslope of disturbance, as needed. '5FZ H ED 'D�N I L 5 FUZ Cb N �;-TZV CR & a 4. Permanent vegetative cover to be installed prior to final inspection approval. Sewer Notes: Sewer Line is Existing 6" Concrete. Existing Stub is 5. Existing Utilities will be removed and/or capped under the demolition permit (BLD20150250). 4' below sewer rim in the street. Stub @ house will be 2' above the 1177U 6. All utilities must be underground. rim in the street (approx 6' of fall in 35', less than 20%) Any new 7. Filter socks will be added to any catch basin downstream from construction site (Edmonds Standard Detail E1.3) portions of line will be gasketed 30/34 sewer pipe, 6" & 4". Line Lu 8. Tracer wire to be installed with water line. has been capped approx. 40'off of front property line and is ready 9. 6" cleanout on sewer line (at property line) to be installed with 12" cast iron lamphole cover with Y2" hexbolts. for inspection. ,jvVNER/GONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL ON -SITE UTILITIES. 4 RELOCATION/REVISION TO ANY UTILITIES MAY REQUIRE SEPARATE PERM OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESQPQ��ISZLE F0fl EROSION CONTROL AWD DRAINAGE .0 1SCH 40 .... ........ .. N -12 Flie umcon ALL EXPOSED SU9,FACES -10 BE CoVa D ',dylT 2 DKIN IME I il-Vi The depth of the spreader as measured from the lip should be at least 6 inches and it should be uniform across the entire length. Level sprea ders shall be setback from the property line unless there is 7�% W an easement for flow. W(A kA iyty) Level spreaders, when installedevery so often in grassy swales, keep b-E 56a Oy' the flows from concentrating. Materials that can be used include sand 4h bags, lumber, logs, concrete, and pipe. To function properly, the material rjeeds to be installed level and on contour. Figures 4. 11 and V10 -F �-t 4.12 provide a cross-section and a detail of a level spr* eader. Maintenance The spreader should be inspected after every runoff event to ensure that it Standards is functioning correctly. The contractor should avoid the placement of any material on the structure and should prevent construction traffic from crossing over the structure. If the spreader is damaged by construction traffic, it shall be immediately repaired. Pressure -Treated 2'�cl 0" Densely vegetated for a Min. of 100' and slope less than 5:1 i'min. if 3'Min. .RECIeNED Figure 4.11 — Cross Section of Level Spreader MAT Z015 Treated 2"xl O� maybe abuttedwWgMNG MI" Spreader must be level end for max. spreader length -of 50' 6" min. 1 " min. 6" min. El I I I I E El I IE-1:1 I 1E1 I I I I Ed I 1EI I 1=1 I M I mi I 1E1 I 1=1 I 1E1 I I I*,, I 1EI I I 18" min. rebar supports 8'max.' spacing Figure 4.12 - Detail of Level Spreader 4-74 Volume l/ — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 A- 50b UNA, SWkl Roof 'downspout serves up to 700 sf. Of roof 50' min. Vegetated flow path Spljash block house Downspout extension NTS Splash block RECEIVED MAY - 512015 ENIMINEEM Figure 3.7 Typical Downspout Splashblock Dispersion 3-16 Volume 1/1 — Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs ebruary 2005 t AvM ]F'�OPL-�ZTT C-5 2-3,e4 02- -75 t" Aie, W DRIVEWAY -SLOPE 29 WASHED'ROCK CN 1-1/2" TO 3/4" DRIVFWAY TRENCH DETAIL NTS 4+ fn UA lot Z �4- m ivi i'M u m RECEIVED MAY - 4 2015 BiGINEMNG INSION f, r NAR 18 M5 Western Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. 4183 Saltsprings Dr., Ferndale, WA 98248 Plione/FAX (360)380-2507 March 16, 2015 SmithLand Development Services 6428 221"Ave. NE, Granite Falls, WA 98252 stacy@stacysmith.net Re: Geotechpicall Investigation 23402 75t' Ave. W., Edmonds, WA Western Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. is pleased, to present the results of our geotechnical site investigation to determine feasible methods of ston-nwater management at the above referenced property. The scope of our services included the logging and sampling of 2 test pits to obtain subsurface information for determining sto.rmwater management methods. The initial plan was to manage stormwater using a rain garden. We oversaw the- excavation of a test pit where the rain garden was proposed and we found that area was underlain by hard glacial till at the base of the topsoil layer. We interpreted this to be an area that had been cut since unweathered till was so close to tile ground surface. Based on these findings we excavated a test pit at the proposed new house location to see if similar soil conditions existed. The excavation revealed that glacial till was present at 3-1/2 feet below grade. Surface Conditions The property is an -irregular shaped parcel that is 0. 193 acres in size and is grass covered with some trees and shrubs. The property slopes to the east at about 3 percent. There is an existing home on the west side of the property and the plan is to remove the existing house and build a new house east of the existing house. Figure I is a site plan showing the property boundaries and site layout. Subsurface Conditions I Soil and groundwater conditions were investigated on March 11, 20.15 at the app�oximate test pit locations shown on theiSite Plan, Figure 1. Samples of soil s-encountered were obtained and soils were classified using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Edited, tabulated test pit logs are included in this report together with a USCS Chart explaining soil descriptions. In test pit I we encountered I foot of dark brown sandy gravelly organic SILT to silty gravelly SAND with nurnerous roots and organic matter (OUSM by USCS). This topsoil layer was underlain by gray silty SAND with some gravel that was very compact, and. was interpreted to be a sandy glacial till. In test pit 2 we logged 0.6feet of dark brown sandy gravelly organic SILT to silty gravelly SAND, with roots and organic matter (OL/SM by USCS) (topsoil). Below this topsoil layer we encountered an orange brown very silty fine to medium SAND with some rounded gravel (SM by USCS) that extended to a depth of 2.2 feet. Geotechnical Investigation 23402 75'h Ave. West Edmonds, WA March 16, 2015 Westem Geotechnical Consultant-,, Inc. #15 24 1 (Page 2 of 5) Below this layer we encountered a fine to coarse sandy GRAVEL with cobbles and occasional boulders ((GM by USCS) that extended to a. depth of 3.5 feet. Between 3.5 and 4.7 feet we encountered a gray silty SAND with sorne gavel that we interpreted to be hard glacial till. No groundwater was encountered in either of the test pits at the time of our subsurface investigation on 3/11/2015. Conclusions and Recommendations Based an our test pit investigation the initial stormwater management plan was changed. Since glacial. till soil in test pit I was encountered close to the ground surface, a rain garden would not be appropriate for that location. It was decided that tile proposed house could be moved back to the west on the lot by 20- feet to tile location shown on Figure 1. By moving the house location, the stormwater drainage frorn the western half of the roof will be dispersed by using splash blocks. For the eastern half of the house, there is enough room to direct the stormwater drainage to a level spreader, as shown on Figure 1. Splash blocks are limited to 700 square feet per splash block, and. they are required to have a minimum, 50 feet of vegetated flow path. A level spreader requires a minimum 25 foot flow path, so with the house moved to the west, a level spreader can be placed. 10 feet from the house and stil I meet the minimum flow path requirements. The three percent slope of the property to the cast will provide enough vegetation area to handle the stormwater runoff from the splash blocks and level spreader. A typical splash block detail and the level spreader detail are attached to this report. If during construction subsurface conditions encountered are different than those indicated in this report, we should be advised so we can review and revise our recommendations, if necessary. We appreciate the opportunity to be of assistance to you on tl-ds project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, Please contact our office. Sincerely, Western ;chn�*nsultants, Inc. T��R ( . " r Tf.ieodor'e H P.E. Geotechnical Engineer Inclusions: Figure I — Site Plan & Test Pit Locations USCS Classification Chart Tabulated. Test Pit Logs Attachments: Typical Splash Pad Detail Typical Level spreader Detail File: 15 24 1 Geolechnical Investigation WcStern Geolechnical Consullaills, Inc. 23402 75"',,Ave. West 815 24 1 Edmonds, WA March 16. 20 15 (Page 3 of 5) Figure I Site Plan &. Test Pit. Locations Owner/Applicant:. Can -Am Properties, LLC 21331 Happy Valley Rd. Stanwood, WA 98292 Contact/Contractor: Allen Campbell High Definition Construction 17114 103,d Place NE Granite Falls. WA 98252 (360) 772-6515 Existing Site Address: 23402 75tt, Ave W., Edmonds Tax I.D, #: 004888-004-008-04 Lot Size: 8.392 SF Lot Coverage: 27% A = 352.5' 8 = 352.5' C = 351.25' D = 351' Average = 351.8' Impervious Surface: Pre-1977 House/Driveway 1831 Proposed House/Mobile: 2,548 Driveway: 505 Total: 3,053 NOTES: 109,24' rn A0 C r') _j, tM 20' 27'- - ---------- - ----- Existing 1) iveay Z Exist. SFR (h To Be Removed )< -- ------- ------- 4� j'm 35' < 02 50'X 32' 2� ----------- ------ L_.L0 3 D 124.81' 1. Downspouts to Rain Garden. 2. Stockpiles to be covered within 24 hours. 3. Silt Fence to be installed downslope of disturbance, as needed. 4. Permanent vegetative cover to be installed prior to final Inspection approval. 5, I Scale: 1 in 20ft. Oin. Oft. Qft. 200. 40 n. 11IN131014 QATF 111LE Smith Land Development Services 3/13/2015 23402 75"' Ave W/ 004888-004-008-04 6428 221 5� Ave. NE DESCnIP11014 Granite Falls, WA 98252 Bus (425) 238-6324 DATI 2r2312015 I niAmN 13Y STACY PAGE JQF1 scm I- 1" - 20' Fax.(360) 691-4857 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART (USCS) MA%M DIN1910M I ruw symam WrEA WMWL TWICAL DESCWT11M GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS CLEAN GRAVELS GRAVELS (Unic an no C nkil C'W aw "111=11111 umirftlo"Ai", Gp C413 FWftV-"#AIDtCA0 $,CRAM SAND winIlk rL ex No S. T nits COARSE GRAINED SOILS 1101111 IIIAN wit or COA "r MACON V GRAVELS WITH FINES S Cr_ 7] am CIM 94rr CRAW S COAVIt-SAIM-SILF L411UREL 2 or Timis) -till ac GC CLAM CRAIKJS. CItAVCt-SWb.CAy umnim SAND CLEAN SANDS r SW wlti;�� 0"Vikky No Mal AND SANDY SOILS (untc an :1 SP P00*11-GOM SANDS. GKOLMLY SAN131. UITIC an No full mm INAN soll or VAIMIAL Is 1w TRW ow 10MIX rpm aux Cr C"r 'T.114" SANDS Willi FINES 81A skly URN, &VID-S&I MIMS WPOKCIAKE ou"I or FIX$) It. Sc — - CIATLY $AND%. SAND.CLAY k4xI UM ML 1110100A)w SILTS AMD VENT M SAIIK wx 14.00. SILIV 0A CLAVIV FIRE ui*s 00 CtAI" Ini"-SUGKT FULSMATI CL ""GANIC CLAYS Of LOV 10 MCOW PLASTICITY. eftyliky CLAYS. SM40V CLAYS. 511TV CLAYS. JIM CLAYS SILTS. AND tow" tut utt" 50 COYS I I I I OL DK&Bit 2413 me 0AGANG Sitry CLAYS or tow "Wry FINE GRAINED SOILS MH ORCAAK SILTS. lam wS on ul SILFV Sul MMAUOUS Far wob art 1=9 THAN S" or VAUJIM SI TS AND 1AM tul CLAYS fAIIARIffl! IKAN So r/m/o CH CUKTS of INC" MASIXITY. FAI CLAYS 10 ORGANIC CLAYS W uroluu 10 Whi PLASTIC111, ORGANIC Sit$$ HIC14LY ORGANIC SOILS PT W., -1--- 0 GRADATION CHART PARTICLE SIZE MATERIAL SIZE tOWER LIMIT UPPER LIMIT MILLWO&I - i- KwE SZE Munittreis smw WE SAND FINE VEDIUM COARSE .074 CL42 2.00 f4b 110 - 0.42 2.00 040 - 110 J4 GRAVEL FINE 4.76 14 191 3/4' COARSE 191 3/4' 762 X COBBLES 76.2 r 30ke BOULDERS 304.8 or 914.4 - U.S. STANDARD . QCAR SOUMC OPEMMS 5-12X FINE$ (SILT & CLAY) OVAL CLASS PLASTICITY CHART LIOUID LIMIT M M M M IMI01, Imum M M M010 Qu zu uo . go . too I LKey - to Test Pit Logo Using the is Unified SO11 Classification System 4 181 SaitsprIngs Drive a Ferndale. WA 98248 Phone (360) 380-2507 a Fax 066) 380-2507 A. -TEST Fus 511 It MA 0 > > < LA ct 0 0 0 &O� 0 Geotechnical Investigation Wcstern Gcotechnical Consultants, Inc. 2340275 1h Ave. West #15 24 1 Edmonds, WA March 16, 2015 (Page 5 of 5) Log of Test Pits File: 15 24 1 Test Depth USCS Soil Description Sairiple Water Lab Pit No. Interval Class. No./ Content Testing (feet) Depth N (feet) TP- 1 0-1.0 OUSM Dark brown sandy gravelly organic 1- 1 /0.5' 20.7% S [LT to silty gravelly SAND, numerous roots and organic matter. (topsoil) (moist, relatively non -compact) 1.0-1.7 SM Gray silty SAND, some gravel 1-2/1.7' . 6.5% (rnoist, very compact) (sandy glacial till) (hard to excavate) Log of Test Pits File: 15-24 1 Test Depth USCS Soil Description Sample Water Lab Pit No. Interval Class. No./ Content Testing (feet) Depth (feet) TP-2 0-0.6 SM/OL Dark brown sandy gravelly organic SILT to silty, gravelly SAND, numerous roots and organic matter. (topsoil) (moist, relatively non -compact) 0.6-2.2 SM Orange brown. very silty fine to 2-1/2.0' 19.8% medium SAND, some rounded gravel (i-noist, relatively compact 2.2-3.5 GM Brown silty fine to coarse sandy 2-2/3.0' 11.4% GRAVEL with cobbles, occasional boulders (moist, relatively cornpact) 3.5/4.7 SM Gray silty SAND, some gravel 2-3/4.0' 6.6% ??? (i-noist, very compact) (sandy glacial till) (hard to excavate) Attachments Roof downspout serves up to 700 sf. Of roof 50'min. Vegetated flow path Splash block house Downspout extension NTS Splash block Figure 3.7 Typical Downspout Splashblock Dispersion .ebruary 2005 3-16 Volume 1/1 — Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs a ( -3 *stern Geotechnical Consultants, Ince 4183 Salt Springs Drive�Femdalej-WA.98248 Phone/FAX.(360) 380-2507 Rressura-Treated 2"X10" Densely vegetated for a Min. of 100'and-slope wenpactad b*cW lesi than 5:1 PO&KIW 0108 waMed rock .7 4R OL Spreadarrhust be level' Treatod 2N1 d* may'be abutted end to end for mdx. sprdader length of 50' 6' "n. ........... .. . min. 6' min. 7r' III TTI --I I I I I 18" min. r9bar'supports Vmax. spacing Modified J)IspersionTren�Wwith Notched 211x1011 Level Spreader RESUB MAY 05 20b BUILDING DEPARc-,MENT BMP C206: Level Spreader STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS Purpose To provide a temporary outlet for dikes and diversions consisting of an excavated depression constructed at zero grade across a slope. To convert concentrated runoff to sheet flow and release it onto areas stabilized by existing vegetation or an engineered filter strip. Conditions of Use Used when a concentrated flow of water needs to be dispersed over a large area with existing stable vegetation. Items to consider are: 1. What is the risk of erosion or damage if the flow may become concentrated? 2. Is an easement required if discharged to adjoining property? 3. Most of the flow should be as ground water and not as surface now. 4. Is there an unstable area downstream that cannot accept additional ground water? Use only where the slopes are gentle, the water volume is relatively low, and the soil will adsorb most of the low flow events. Design and Use above undisturbed areas that are stabilized by existing vegetation. Installation Specifications If the level spreader has any low points, flow will Concentrate, create channels and may cause erosion. 0 Discharge area below the outlet must be uniform with a slope of less. than 5H: IV. 0 Outlet to be constructed level in a stable, undisturbed soil profile (not on fill). The runoff shall not reconcentrate after release unless intercepted by another downstream measure. The grade of the channel for the last 20 feet 6f the dike or interceptor entering the level spreader shall be less than or equal to I percent. The grade of the level spreader shall be 0 percent to ensure uniform spreading of storm runoff. A 6-inch high gravel berm placed across the level lip shall consist of washed crushed rock, 2- to 4-inch or 3/4-inch to 1 Y2-inch size. The spreader length shall be determined by estimating the peak flow expected from the 10-year, 24-hour design storm. The length of the spreader shall be a minimum of 15 feet for 0. 1 cfs and shall be 10 feet for each 0. 1 cfs there after to a maximum of 0.5 cfs per spreader. Use multiple spreaders for higher flows. The width of the spreader should be at least 6 feet. February 2005 Volume Construction Stoanwater Pollution Prevention 4-73 • The depth of the spreader as measured from the lip should be at least 6 inches and it should be uniform across the entire length. • Level spreaders shall be setback from the property line unless there is an easement for flow. • Level spreaders, when installed every so often in grassy swales, keep the flows from concentrating. Materials that can be used include sand bags, lumber, logs, concrete, and pipe. To function properly, the material needs to be installed level and on contour. Figures 4.11 and 4.12 provide a cross-section and a detail of a level spreader. Maintenance The spreader should be inspected after every runoff event to ensure that it Standards is functioning correctly. The contractor should avoid the placement of any material on the structure and should prevent construction traffic from crossing over the structure. If the spreader is damaged by construction traffic, it shall be immediately repaired. Pressure -Treated 2"xl 0" Dens6ly ed for a Min. of 1 =slope l6ess than KA 1'Min. 3'Min. mgum 4.11 — uross bection of Level spreader Treated 2"xl 0" may be abutted end to Spreader must be level end for max. spreader length of 50' 1 6" min. i _'S /I- NZ -NV-OOI' 77 6" min. Ell 1EE11M 11 11 Ed I 1EE1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I M I lEd I 1=1 I 1= I I 1=1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I 1=41= I 1=1 I EL-11 I r— r 18" min. rebar supports 8'max. spacing Figure 4.12 - Detall of Level Spreader I" min. � I IN 4-74 Volume 11 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 ,# - q-1 pl, 34 f o 4Z -a Sox �r = /JS-o (o-. ox .6 4t < S-M sy') OS,6 a,5 << 0- 1 OS CLACk VJ^5� AAA- O�-,S�A C.V2 V. 6 1 4-,n-14 -514-51el-s- 0 Design Criteria for Splashblocks A typical downspout splashblock is shown in Figure 3.7. In general, if the ground is sloped away from the foundation and there is adequate vegetation and area for effective dispersion, splashblocks will adequately disperse storm runoff. If the ground is fairly level, if the structure includes a basement, or if foundation drains are proposed, splashblocks with downspout extensions may be a better choice because the discharge point is moved away from the foundation. Downspout extensions can include piping to a splashblock/discharge point a considerable distance from the downspout, as long as the runoff can travel through a well -vegetated area .as described below. The.following apply to the use of splashblocks: I A vegetated flowpath of at least 50 feet should be maintained between the discharge point and any property line, structure, steep slope, stream, wetland, lake, or other impervious surface. Sensitive area buffers may count toward flowpath lengths. 2. A maximum of 700 square feet of roof area may drain to each splashblock. 3. A splashblock or a pad of crushed rock (2 feet wide by 3 feet long by 6 inches deep) should be placed at each downspout discharge point. 4. No erosion or flooding of downstream properties may result. 5. Runoff discharged towards landslide hazard areas must be evaluate ' d by a professional engineer with geotechnical. expertise or a qualified geologist. Splashblocks may not be placed on or above slopes .'greater than 20% or above erosion hazard areas without evaluation by a professional engineer with geotechnical expertise or a licensed geologist, hydrogeologist, or engineering geologist, and jurisdiction approval. 6. For sites with septic systems, the discharge point must be downslope of the primary and reserve drainfield areas. This requirement may be waived if site topography clearly prohibits flows from intersecting the drainfield or where site conditions (soil permeability, distance between systems, etc) indicate that this is unnecessary. February 2005 Volume /// — Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs 3-15 house Roof downspout serves up to ... 700 sf. Of roof ... ...... ....... 5 n Va�t e d V, ............. flo th 0 a n a lash ... c .... Splash. block Downspout extension NTS Splash block Figure 3.7 Typical Downspout Splashblock Dispersion 3-16 Volume /I/ — Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs ebruary 2005 PLANNING DATA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL .Name: Date: (A Site Address: -7, 3 440,2_ Ave- Tax Parcel: 6 6 -4 8,58 OoLk 66 a a4 Project Description: Plan Check # 1 901.) 20-1 S; - C) -3 Reduced Site Plan Prov ided:d?�S- NO) Zoning: Map Page: Corner Lot: (YES /d� Flag Lot: (YES Critical Areas Determination #: 6(Z A tcr I H Study Required.'' waiver SEPA Determination: Exempt El Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) 13 Fee 0 Checklist 0 APO List with notarized form 4- Requl're'd Setbacks Street: Side: 1,j -- 5, e: --71/ Rear: ActualSetbacks Street: 3-7 Side: Side: Rear: El Detached Structures: Rockeries: Fences/Trellises: El Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: 0 Stairs/Deck: Height �Patum Point: 5e. Datum Elevation: Maximum Height Allowed: ActualHeight: other Parking Required:. Parking Provided: Lot Area: -2— Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: la Lot Coverage Calculations:, 2- ADU Created: (YES Subdivision: 2- Lepl Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued:. (YES Comments Plan Review By: Planni . ng Data Form 07-14-09 0 STREET FILE The City of Edmonds APPLICATION for "DE SE!NWSElDREr;7rfREPAIRS OUTSIDE E] CA-RD No . .......... EASEMENT No . ...................................... OWNER ........... ------ ....................................... ---------- ? CONTRACTOR .......... .. e�.l . ........................................ PERMIT No. HOUSE No J, STREET AVENUE LOT No. - A BLOCK No. 2j - ------ .......... - ---------------------------------------------- .!!k ...... ................. . ...................................... NAMEADD . ......... ... 19 .................................................................................... 2 F, Lu cr L: 41, Date Approved: BACKPILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................... DEPOSIT, $ ............................................. SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED .......................................... DATE ..... B Y 7 APPROVED �Jfi 2 7 1,%3