23628 76TH AVE W.PDF111111111111
6435
23628 76TH AVE W
15.115crel-AUVA-2 MIM
NOV 0 6 1996 PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST
p
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5;7
PLAN CHECK #: �&::�
RECEIPT DATE: dz—A�A:7
/ t -
EVIEW D Y:.(Initial/Date)
PLAN. WATER
COMMENTS
FIRE
BLDG. SEWER
STRr=ET!E:NS.]
SetbacksNariance/Setback Adjustment
......... .. 1
� 50mMEM.
Conditional Use Permit
.... .........................
2
AD13 Requirements
Other Zoning Requirements
------------
Underground Wiring Required
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................
Lot Slope 15%
- —
SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit
Tree Cutting Plan
- - - - - - - - - - - - -----
0
9
Plat/Subdivision Requirements
Legal Description Verification
Iffil
10
Quit Claim/Street Dedications
Easements - Public/Private
14
Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee
. . . . . . . .
Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee
gmmg
Drainage Plan (On -Site) vie, i-e
M.
Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses
...........
16.
Setback - Storm Drain Line
A
Open Ditch - Existing
18:
Culvert Required
Culvert Size
Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff
Catch Basin Required
Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access C$t6yt,
Sidewalk Required %e-4
Curb & Gutter Required
�2.6 .
Curb Cut For Driveway Requirecr
26,
Street Paving Required
. 27
Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required
.......
28
Street Name Sign Required
29
Other Signing Required
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bond Required For Public Improvements
FEMA Map Check/Water Table fell—
.M
Side Sewer Availability
33
Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID # IDS
34
Create Street File
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IV;kl Jt:
Existing Water Main Size
Water Meter Size
Service Line Size
UV
Water Meter Charge Required
Hydrant Required
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-40
Hydrant Size Existing
S U
11
.......... -
Fire Line Charge Required - Sprinkler
Street Cut
IMiscellaneous
Reviewed By:
FIRE
PLANNING
, � do ""�/ k---) fAl-
ENGINEERIN6 PU13LIC WORKS
R E C 0 R D - OF C 0 N T A C T S
21
2
22
3
23
4
24
5
25
6
26
7
27
8
28
RW PERMIT # DATE ISSUED RECEIPT #
9
29
10
30
11
31
12
32
13
PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE
33
SS PERMIT # DATE ISSUED RECEIPT #
14
PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE
34
15
35
16
36
37
METER SIZE PAID $ DATE RECEIPT #
18
38
19
39
20
40
0 1 9
C4y of Edmon&
M
Critical Areas Checkli . st
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on
this form is to be filled out by any person
preparing a Development Permit
Application for the City of Edmonds prior
to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
T'he purpose of the Checklist is to enable
City staff to determine whether any
potential Critical Areas are or may be
present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the
Checklist should'be easily available from
observations of the site or data available. at
City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps,
or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it,
and submit it to the City. The City will
review the checklist, make a precursory site
visit, and make a determinationof the
subsequent steps -necessary to complete a
development -permit application-
W_1th2. signed copy of this form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel
with enough detail that City staff can find
and -identify the subject parcei(s). In
addition, the applicant shall include
Otherperfinent information (e.g.-site
Plan, topography map, etc.) -or studies in
conjunction with this Checklist to assist
staff in completing their prdiminary
assessment,of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner Applicant:. Applicant Representative:
Name Nanx
Street Add is
Street Address
City, State, ZIP Phone ILL? OZ-7-_J�;51
Cityl/"11, e, ZIP Phone
Signature
Date gnature Date
4-�A VILL� NU.
Critical Areas Checklist C
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
L Site Address/Locati on: j0tt AVe IA
2. Property Tax Account Number: - 312-304-1- CO- -00-051 4*/tt
3. Approximate Site Size (acres -or square feet): -76P60 C9 '0
4 kv. 119, 96
4. Is this site currently developed?
-)< yes; no.
If yes; how is site developed? 5o�IL-y KEiev.
5. Describe the general site topography- Check all.that apply.
- Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
- Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopespresent on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains -areas of year-round standing water Ro ;Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: tA0 Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the yearT
8. Site is in the floodway ' 1AD floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds sufface? Flows are ye . ar-
round? . TAIC Flows are seasonal? KO (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested m6dow _;shrubs mixed
urban landscaped'(lawn,shrubs etc) X
1*1. Obvious wetland is present on site: t�v--
-For City Staff Use Only
L Site is Zoned?
2. kS mapped soil type(s)? 7-
3. Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site?
4..,-. :-,.Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site?
5. 'Si.te within' designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?
6. -Site des';ignated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map?. AA
RE -TER Nff N A T 10 N
"STUDY REQUIRED
W AIVER,
Reviewed by:_
Plagifer
R,rV 0 1/0494
CONDITIONAL WAIVER
10 -,)1 - 74�
Date
Z
2i
U
�:i
A�
0
U
0
Z
0
LLI
V)
U
C4
0
CITY OF EDMONDS �Iermit No.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 000,:sue Date
RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT STREET FILt
A. *Address or vicinity of Constrdction
23628 76 AV W Phit e 167-070
Owner: T:7aSh'nZ-M ��latbrcnl r'as Co
Name
866 156 AV WE
Mailing Address
BiUlevue, T4as!'Anaton 98007
City, State, Zip Code
Contractor: Sawiz As Wnrrun
Name
Mailing Address
0 Permit Issued To:
, RsT -
Type of Work to be Done: pA4 r a TeEft
Work in Connection With:
• Sub or Plat 1B Single Family
• Comml. / Ind. 1:1 Apt. Condo.
9 Pavement Cut: 11 Yes 0 No
State License Number
City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
B..APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is to be in ' spected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call
775-2525, extension 220.
I understand that this Pekustbe availablVthA site for inspection purposes at all times.
n
Signature 1%___?� AV ate
Owner or A/ nt
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
C. Issued By:
Time Authorized: Vold after —days
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
Permit Fee:
Security Deposit:
Receipt No.:
Fund III Fee:
Street Cut Dimensions
X
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
Eng. Div. Decembcr 1978
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund. 111 - R. oute con.v to Street Dept.
r^mmrn�"* 0 -
Diagram:
Contractor called for inspection Yes
I
Nork DisaPproved By: Date:— By: Date:
Work Apnroved By: Date:
Inspector:
Encr. Div. December 1978
0
J*
The City
OWNER
HOUSE No . .....
APPLICATION CARD No.
for
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
OUTSIDE 0 INSIDE Cr"'� REPAIRS 0 EASEMENT No.
le. / ........................................................ ............. CONTRACTOR ........ ..................... ..... . .......... . PERMIT N
'p, STREET
............. ........... . w ........................................ AVENUE LOT No . ...................... ..................................... .............. . BLOCK No . . ................. ..... ..... . ...... . . ...... ... .
NAMEADD . ....... . ................................................................. ................... ...... ........... ..... . ..... ..
e-t:f
W, /V 24--l'
APPROVED
191%2
Date Approved
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED .................. ......................... DEPOSIT, $ ...................................................... /7
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ...................... .........................
DATE ....... ... ........................... By..e ........................................ I ....................................
<01
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s). Any person or entity requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
the map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
employees or officers shall be liable for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
*90 19
City of Edmonds
a
Critical Areas Checklis. t
IMe Critical Areas Checklist contained on
this forin is to be filled Out by any person
preparing a Development permit
Application for the City of Edmonds prior
to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
Ile purpose of the Checklist is to enable
City staff to determine whether any
potential Critical Areas are or may -be
present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the
Checklist should be easily available from
observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps,
or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative,
must fill out the checklist, sicyn and date it,
b
and submit it to the City. The City will
review the checklist, make a precursory site
visit, and make a determinationof the
subsequent Steps necessary to complete a
development -permit application.
With a signed copy of this form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
plan for individual lots of parcel
with enough detail that City staff can find
and identify the'subject parcel(s)_ In
addition, the applicant shall include
Gtherperfinent information (e.g. Site
Plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in
conjunction with this Checklist to assist
sUff In co m-pleting their preliminary
2messment,of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge,(fill -out the appropriate column below).
Owner I Applicant:
Name
Street Address
City, State, ZIP Phone
Signature Date
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
L &�A D q i�O 3:72
City,/�Ife, ZIP Phone
ignature 7—Date
4-�A 1"11-L NU.
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
L Site Address/Locati on: 0:ka
-74;1t AVP-
2. Property Tax Account Number: -c5rj
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developO? _2'� yes; no.
If yes; how is site developed? 'bN&%W- 15�-jk�y.
5. Describe the general site topography- Check all that apply.
Flat: less an 5-feet elevation chan nuor ont;vo ;to
191to
tq,w.
'r,9,96
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet)-
Hilly: slopespresent on site of more than 15 % and less than 30 % ( a vertical rise.
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
0ther (please des cribe):
6. Site contains -areas of year-round standing water Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway_ Ao fl4Dodpl ain of a water course.
9. Sitecontains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? tA19 Flows are seasonal? KO (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shru bs mixed
urban landscaped (Jawn,shrubs etc) X
11. Obvious wedand is present on site:
For City Staff Use Only
1. Site is Zoned?
2. �CS mappeA soil type(s)?..A" &L-,O/w Z, s S -�Ioe
3. Weiland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? A10
4..'- !-,.Critical Axeas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site?
5. within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?
6. Site des';ignated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? AA
RE-TERNUNATION
'-`STUDY REQUIRED CONDrrfONAL WAIVER
WAIVER
Reviewed by:_ 112
Z— 4 /
Plapfer Date
KCV01104M
PLANNING DATA
NAME: CAn; I- Ar,,u T,'14-
SITE ADDRESS:-2-36 2-8— 76' k W —DATE: lill-1-196
ZONING: PLAN CHK#:- e(- - 1)6 - 2_35�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: -6,m,&ML,4
V
ACW ff% IdLIAU
CORNERLOT N2 .(Yes/No)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 2-5' Left Side: 7Y2. ' Right Side: Rear: (S'
Actual Setbacks:
Front: 25' Left SideV�.M,4- RiQht Side: 1.3' Rear: 30
Street map checked for additi I o'nWsretbaci required? vz,,4
(�eyNo)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED k - (Y/N)
LOT COVERAGE: . I*L�
Maximum Allowed: -3572�70 —Actual:
OAI- 60,,^,zA
BUILDING HEIGHT: Wft
Maximum Allowed: 2-51 —Actual Height: It
Datum Point: &,A& a, 7 &Avc Datum Elevation: Icb'%'
SUBDIVISION: - (ALa
CRITICAL AREAS #: Z, Z
SEPA DETERMINATION:
LOT AREA: 7, 1, E>
U-, 6, 1-,4* ft esr
17,40, 30 D. I. , 3
OTHER: �,Az SA-cr Wrn,
�k o6�-� 6 tel* S,-4,
Plan Review By: —
VW �4'
64,b wm% 4V k 40-C... 1 f--fk Pot WbT an"� Am, k-'-f P-Mh -
31IJ 133HIS
F. — ------ --- ------
N 88d 35' 30" W
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- —
1
2 00'
REWORK EXISTIN
. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .
GATES AND FENCE
.
.
_4S REQtttRED--- CIL
9,-0"
20'-0"
HEAT PUM
9 9,0
..
.... .. ... .....
..........
.. .........
... .........
.. .........
.. ........
--44EW ASPHALT
PAVING
ROOF OVEPHANG----'�
15'-0'
�REAR YARD SETBACK
WWASM
MM
p
FLIT
'�RLLn
...... ... ..
.
p
z
.
':�:NEW
WATERP.RDO F, ......
. . . .... .......
.. . ..... ..
L+l—oli--ocm--
N 88d 35' 30" w
102,00'
SITE PLAN
"I6�NO
0-1-0,
y1v
.5
C,
FRONrYARD SETBACK
LLJ
0
0
V)
NEW GONG,
ONG3AN
STEPS AND
WALK, .R..
FINISH
BUILDING FOOTPRIN
101.0
I
..dl2'.-
10 .. AT]..
STAR SECTION
Lu
MANHOLE
DATUM ELEV
100.00 w
0
LLJ
>
<
cc
CL
m
-4c
PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
To: Applicant
From: Jamal Mahmoud, Engineering Inspector FILF,
Owner: C"y � Aua —C-. &&- Plan Check No:96— 23�
Address: 7-3,6 ?:4- '11 "- A, - I A Date: Alvv-9 n a. A
After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met:
1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 ArvL-10:00 P.IVL;WEEKENDS/HOLEDAYS — 10:00 A.rvL-6:00 PAL
2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60)
3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance.
4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 18.30.030d).
5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE
FACILITY. BUELDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING.
(ECDC 18.30.50G)
6., FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION.
(ECDC 18.30)
7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN
INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30)
8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp
may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit.
(ECDC 18.90)
1 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to
(ECDC 18.80.060D)
10. Driveways must be paved firorn property line to City RIGErr-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C)
11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRrVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AF17ER POURING. (ECDC 18.30)
12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department
13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter (ECDC 7.20).
14. A back water valve is required if downstaks plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20)
15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet m inimum. (ECDC 18.10)
16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required.
LID# Fees paid: Yes— No Charge�.. (ECDC 18.10)
17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed
value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) -
18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY
OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90)
PRWAMDOC
N 88d 35' 30" W
2. 00'
---
--- --- --- ---
R REWORK EXISTIN
E
AND FENCE
_G-ATES
RE I
S REOMEb-
20'-0'
HEAT PUM p
c� 1
--NEW ASPHALT
0
0
PAANG
ROOF OVERHANG--"
REAR YARD SETBACK-'
NEW
p4g?
t7
FRONTYARD SETBA
Lu
C,
3R 0 6
Lo
Lo
Al
Lf)
z
<�E.
W r
NEW CONC,
'0
STEPS A"
WALK. BROOM
W WATER PROOF
:1
FINISH
9
Ix
BUILDING
FbOTPRIN
'101.0
94.c)
LtLo(LoR._-
894132 0
N 88d 35' 30" W
102.00'
SITE PLAN
0- r-O.
y1v
F.U..ATI.N
O.S12 SECnON
F—
Ln
Li
3:
MANHOLE
D ATUM ELEV.
10O.D0 Lli
0 -:3
z
LLJ
I,,*
00-
a.
0
AE
�.n
2E
;Z
co
cc
:c
-7
M
PACIFIC TESTING LABORATORIES
\N1,
Since 1926
Seattle 0 Bothell * Tacoma Peninsula - Portland - One Lab - One Consultant - One Solution
December 10, 1996
Certificate No. 9612-90 10 CITY COPY
Mr. Brian Jones
BRIDGEWAY. CONSTRUCTION
3826 Woodland Park Avenue North
Seattle, WA 98103
Subject: Evaluation of Concrete Foundation, 23628 76th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington
Dear Mr. Jones:
Pacific Testing Laboratories was retained to perform an evaluation of the subject residence foundation
walls for damage due to fire exposure. The residence is a rambler with a daylight basement. The
bas ' ement has a fall height wall along the east side of the house that tapers down on the north and south
sides to a low stem wall �long the west side. The inspection was conducted December 6, 1996. The fire
was reported to hav . e occurred approximately 6 months prior to this inspection.
CONCRETE EVALUATION
There were only minor indications of heat damage to some sections of the basement walls. These
locations were the north wall at the northeast comer of the basement, and the east wall directly under the
front entry ' way. Minor micro -cracking of the concrete surface was noted in these areas, but the only
discoloration was a blackened surface due to* soot deposits. Chipping at the concrete revealed that -there
was no penetration of excessive heat into the concrete, as evidenced by the lack of discoloration. These
observations indicate the concrete did not reach temperatures high enough or sustained long enough to
cause damage to the concrete. The majority of the basement walls are either discolored from soot
deposits (without any cracking), or were never exposed directly to flames where the drywall was left still
partially intact. These walls show no indications of damage.
3257 161h Avenue Wes4 Seattle, Washington gel 19
Tel (206) 282-0666 Fax (206) 282-0710,
Pacific Testing Laboratories
Engineers - -Consultants o Scientists
BRIDGEWAY CONSTRUCTION
Certificate No. 9612-9010
December 9, 1996
Page 2
To verify the visual observations that the areas exhibiting micro -cracking were in fact undamaged, in -
place concrete strength tests were performed in two locations using a Windsor Probe. The first location
was the wall beneath the entry way, which exhibited slightly more micro -cracking I than the north wall.
The second location was selected approximately 10 to 1.5 feet south of the first location, where the
concrete was protected from direct flame by drywall. The concrete here had no discoloration or micro -
cracks and was not affected by the heat of the fire. The results of the test, performed in accordance with
ASTM C803, indicated that the compressive strength at the two locations were identical, and have an
indicated'compressive strength well over 3,000 psi. This testing confirms the visual observations that no
damage was done to the concrete which could sacrifice its structural integrity.
REINFORCING STEEL SPACING
The wall reinforcement was verified in three locations using a pachometer. The spacing of the bars
typically fell in the range of 16 to 18 inches on center, both vertically and horizontally. The locations
checked were the east wall near the southeast comer, the north wall near the northeast comer, and the
east wall under the entry way.
T'his report is provided for the information of Bridgeway Construction only. If this report is to be
reproduced and/or transmitted to a third party', it must be reproduced and/or transmitted in its entirety.
An y exceptions will be made only with the written permission of Pacific Testing Laboratories.
Tlank you for using Pacific Testing Laboratories. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further
assistance to you, please contact us at (206) 282-0666.
. Reviewedby: Robert J. Silbernagel, E.I.T.', Senior Project Manager, Mechanical/Civil Engineeringq��
Approved by: Alan C. Topinka, P.E., General Manager/-ts"',
Sincerely,
Tony J. Sims, P.E., Project Manager
Mechanical/Civil Engineering
PACIFIC TESTING LABORATORIES
Since 1926
Seattle - Bothell - Tacoma - Peninsula - Portland - One Lab - One Consultant - One Solution
December 10, 1996
Certificate No. 9612-90 10
STREFT
c
I L
Mr. Brian Jones
BRDDGEWAY CONSTRUCTION
3826 Woodland Park Avenue North
Seattle, WA 98103
Subject: Evaluation of Concrete Foundation, 23628 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, Washington
Dear Mr. Jones:
Pacific Testing Laboratories was retained to perform an evaluation of . the subject residence foundation
walls for damage due to fire exposure. The residence is a rambler with a daylight basement. The
bas ' ement has a full height wall along the east side of the house that tapers down on the north and south
sides to a low stem wall along the west side. The inspection was conducted December 6, 1996. The -fire
was reported to have occurred approximately 6 months prior to this inspection.
CONCRETE EVALUATION
4. 1
There were only minor indications of heat damage to some sections of the basement wal s. These
locations were the north wall at the northeast comer of the basement, and the east wall directly under the
froht entry * w ay. Minor micro -cracking of the concrete surface was noted in these areas, but the only
discoloration was a blackened surface due to soot deposits. Chipping at the concrete revealed that there
was no penetration of excessive heat into the concrete, as evidenced by the lack of discoloration. These
observations, indicate the concrete did not reach temperatures high enough or sustained long enough to
cause damage to the concrete. Ile majority of the basement walls are either discolored from soot
deposits (without any cracking), or were never exposed directly to flames where the drywall was left still
partially intact. These walls show no indications of damage. 7
3257 16th Avenue Wes4 Seattle, Washington gel 19'
Tel (206) 282-0666 Fax (206) 282-0710
Pacific Testing Laboratories
eers - Consultants Scientists
BRIDGEWAY CONSTRUCTION
Certificate No. 9612-9010
December 9, 1996
Page 2
To verify the visual observations that the areas exhibiting micro -cracking were in fact undarnacred, in -
place concrete strength tests were performed in two locati'o'ns using a Windsor Probe. The first Ito'cation
was the wall beneath the entry way, which exhibited slightly more micro -cracking than the north wall.
The second location was selected approximately 10 to 15 feet south of the first location, where the
concrete was protected from *direct flame by drywall. The concrete here had no discoloration or micro -
cracks and was not affected by the heat of the fire. The results of the test, performed in accordance with
ASTM C803, indicated that' the compressive strength at the two locations were identical, and have an
indicated compressive strength well over 3,000 psi. This testing confirms the visual observations that no
damage was done to the concrete which could sacrifice its structural integrity.
REINFORCING STEEL SPACING
The wall reinforcement was verified in three locations using a pachometer. The spacing of the bars
typically fell in the range of 16 to IS inches on center, both vertically and horizontally. The locations
checked were the east wall near the southeast comer, the north wall near the northeast comer, and the
east wall under the entry way.
This report is provided for the information of Bridgeway Construction only. If this report is to be
reproduced and/or transmitted to a third party, it must be reproduced and/or transmitted in its entirety.
An y exceptions will be made only with the written permission of Pacific Testing Laboratories.
Thank you for using Pacific Testing Laboratories. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further
I
assistance to You, please conta�t us at (206) 282-0660.
Reviewed by: Robert J. Silbernagel, E.I.T. Senior Pro ect Manager, Mechanical/Civil Engineeringq��
j
Approved by: Alan C. Topinka, P.E., General Manage �k�
Sincerely,
Tony J. Sims, P.E., Project Manager
Mechanical/Civil Engineering
2,
4,
'ty t-dwonds
RIGHT-0FC-Z%- C09-STRUCTION'
PERMIT. -2
Permit Number. 91
Issue Date: 01A 4
4n "--w
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction:
B. Type of Work (be specific): 9'zPkA%'C 1�oLs
C. Contractor: Contact:
Mai ling Address- 99 Phone: 0
State License #: -7--Zt�HL*fq5 UN '9602otroLiability Insurance: Bond: $
D. Building Permit # fkapplicable): Side Sewer Permit. # (if applicable):
erc Subdivision
E. E] Comm 'ial E] City Project 0 Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER)
Multi -Family Single Family Other
INSPECTOR: Aam'VL INSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: )XYes []No G. Size of Cut: xvx
7-
APPLICANT TO READ AN-WSIGN
INDEMNITY- Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold 1k;Z7'[ty?qforEdi?�pnds harinlessftoti�injurte.�,"d='g.es, or claims qfany
kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be inade"against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
employees, including or hot limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and 6ttorhey.fees by reason of granting this permit.
JHE COARACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC-
TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCHIS COMPLETED.
B Y CITY FOkES, A T WHICH TIME A D
OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUA NCE TO THE A PPL ICA NT
Two sets of construction dr6vings of proposed work required with permit application.
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220.
Work and ' material is to be inspected during progress and at completion.
Restoration is to, be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regula'ti'ons'as required. by the City Engineer.
All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statemeni§.-and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit ";ill be
available ov.&4a at all.,4wes foMsvection Durpases.
Signature
Date: /0-2
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY: RIGHT OF WAY FEE: 0
TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER DAYS DISRUPTION FEF/FUNb I 11:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE:
Ila iy, 4 TOTAL FEE:
. . .... .......
A 60tcl i0wit'e"C'Pd alea--LL4 RECEIPTN.O...:
t& kiat-)(C . .... ISSUED BY:
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES
Comments:
Diairam.:
(Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.)
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES NO
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By:" Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date,:
t 7"!
7
4
-71
14,
SNOH 0
OhHSA COUNYY PUkIC 19'i!LfftbISi;Ri& N
1.4 e.K'_TTfl140n_.M-,
-RevA2/94
IJDCA-nONA_40'C�F,,
k);?-(0 CT'��AAEA
TIDLE #
1/4 s3�
T27R L4
DATE -2- -7 W.O. # >
REASON FOR WORK
'ENGINEER ViAffbr-M DWG. #
DRAFTER U.G. #
�— _iS. 3F bQ_ C
;DRTE WORKtOMPLETED
ccpw��,
SCALE
:FOREMAN,-..
FFEES REGUIRED:
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
AYES 0310
CO EXEMPT b NOT EXEMPT
PARA. 18 ITEM C
1PRIMARYOVERHEAD
O.H. U.G. COND- 7 KV
U RESIDENTIAL 0 COMMERCIAL
ADD CKT. FT. -PH
ILEO
REM CKT, Fr. -PH
$
NET _CKT. Fr.
SECONDARY OVERHEAD
O.H. U.G. CON.D. KV
BASIC FEE $
ADD CKT. Fr. PH
,0 $_, = $
REM CKT. FT. PH
NET CKT. FT.
RETER/CONV. POLE s
PERMITS (DATE GRANTED)
FRIMARY UNDERGROUND
a RESIDENTIAL . 0 COMMERCIAL
0 TR , E . E.T RI . M
BASIC FEE $
0 STATE::
LEU #
0 COUNTY
$
0 CITY
$
EASEMENTS
$
Q REQUIRED �iNOT REQUIRED
SECONDARY UNDERGR_QUND
BASIC FEE $
10 $
UNDERGROUND PLAT
DATE RELEASED
BASIC FEE $
$
FOREIGN CONTACTS
0 GTNW JPN #
0 CATV JPN #
STREET �IJIGHTING
�(JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CATV
9JOINT BORE GTNW & CATV
WORK INRIGHT-OF-WAY
IJPRIMARY
NDARY
$ j7t LS
POLE STENCILING
FROM -TO
TAKE OFF POLE'
MISCELLANEOUS FEES
VAULT $
PRE-CONSTR. REQUIREMENTS
PERMIT $
C3 TREE TRIM 0 PUD LOCATOR
$
X, BACKHOE 0 FLAGGING
$
XONE CALL DATE
TOTAL DUE: s -7o"51
INDEX
I
PLAT
,2kTE F.�JD
LOGS
U-MAP
I
:fI1ECE!fT#
XFMR- C-MAP I
APPOC-- # -B9
-7
LOCATION MAP PAGE
Arrnvvw
uAl E PRIN I ED
SUBSTATION
CIRCUIT NO. PHASE
-2:
ow �j
�L
DD cv� vw,:�,
ewt
Location: 27N4E31D Scale 1:50
-9-01
(CO
PCAM a, V-�Ozx�k 0
(49�10 7
F0 u lz�
(11k.Xt 0
Z5 tc c:x IC)Q c 7- Z k Nk 060
C,^uz; kQz
kQtxA�j �—, "TIA IG 17J
, E-A�flN(,
3-5005
01
p
-7 \Q
332
ro i
S-217
-7
a��CQCA A
USE
CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE PERMIT
NUMBER 907%19
NSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION jo, TE/APT
ADDRESS
.R NAME NAME OF BUSINESS Z 7& Ave Ws
4?W5 $ LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO.
ING ADDRESS
15-6�2-1e,7 _7VT" AV5 W
8
PO
a:
w
(9
z
RC
W
W
(9
z
W
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP
. EXISTING REOUIRED DEDICATION RW
Street
PROPOSED A�Q Inspection
Sidewalk
Approved 13
Permit Required [3
Use Permit Req*d 13
Required -d&
Required 13
ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER
30- �70 b
M�T 1; SIZE
LINE SIZE
F
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YE NO 0
sx
�ESS I
I I -AY -a- G,,
REMARKS
ZIP
ZY-LANO �073
TELEPHONE NUMBER
S7-7— 197�
7,
o"'It Kee
ENGINEERING MEMO DATP
fit
:M11 IL q 52T
TELEPHONE NUMBER
FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY
--
:LICENSE NUMBER EXjRATTN QAU
M & I
il�%i&V6—t W,2 N6
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PROPOSED
SEPA REVIEW
COMPLETE EXEMPT
EXP
ADS NO.
!I Description of Property - include all easemebt
014 -35 0�� 7-v4F-:, V5 T�' 0S
SHORELINE I
ZTiA Vs 9-- 74E VA G- A OF
VARIANCE OR CU
1
PLANNING REVIEW BY
�2?� 61�
DATE
111-92
!rt-
SETBACKS — FEET
FRONT Z5 ilDETk REAR 15 '
I HEIGHT
'251
LOT CPVERAGE
35 A
kccotlnt
d No. 312104- 1- C)C)*3- co -o-1
REMARKS
NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING(MIECH
COMPLIANCE OR
i ADDITION EJ COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE
APT. EILDG: SIGN
REMODEL
put G F E NCE
REPAIR Vp CYDS. El x FT)
LO,N
WOODSTOVE SWI
DEMOLISH m P6oif
INSERT HOT TUEI/SPA
GARAGE RETAINING WALL/
CAASQAT ROCKERY RENEWAL
CHECKED 8 Y OF CONSTRUCTION -T
ITYPE
ODE
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
REQUIRED
13 YES
IAREA
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER LIBC 108
OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
L-f— Ly
ER
ES
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
UNITS
- 7-A
CRITICAL j4M1Ve0--_.
-
N='9/0- 2 2 7-
'FINAL
:IIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN)
INSPECTION REOUIRED
PLAN CHECK FEE
BUILDING
SOURCE:
GLAZING
PLUMBING
n Check No. Z35
MECHANICAL
Permit covers work to -be done on private property ONLY.
GRADINGIFILL
ly con struction. qn.t he pkjbll� domaIq.(Curbs,-sidewPIks
ieway's, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.'
STATE SURCHARGE
It Application: 180 Days
It Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days
STORM DRAINAGE FEE
.pplicant. on behalf of his or her spouse,- heirs, assigns and
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
essors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
fless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials,
loyees, and agents from any and all claims for,damages of
ever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance
is permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
ify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
imit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
TOTAL., AMOUNT DUE
sion." ..V
.,
eby acknowledge that I have read thig*plication; that the
ation given is correct; and that I am.the owner, or the duly
ATTENTION
ized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and
THIS PERMIT
iws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz-
AUTHORIZES
Abu no person will be employed in violation of the Labor
ONLY THE
.,y,
.4 4 ,
Py np State of W?shington relating to Workmen's Co"mpensa-
WORK NOTED
3urance and ROW 18.27t
INSPECTION
RE OWNER GENT) DATE SIGNED
DEPARTMENT
CITY OF
EDMONDS
NTION
CALL FOR
INSPECTION
AWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE
FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL-QR
771-0220
FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC`--,
109
Vc--
OCCUPALSIT
GROU99-�,
fl-'>
OCCUPANT
LOAD
-j
5
1
to
Uffm
APPLICATION APPROVAL
This application is not a permit until
signed by the Building Off I ' cial or his/her
Deputy; and fees are paid,'a-nd receipt is
acknowledged in space provided.
OIFFIC"SIG D TE
(; & e; h 7-
1IGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector
PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor
... . �. -1
CHESMORE/BUCK
mLr-=l-%lt4m=tLjr-aw
N 88d 35' 30" w 1 2.00'
— --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --------
go-Ott
20'—Otl
Y I
............
.................. ..... .........
.................... ....... .........
.................... ........ . ............
...................... ..........
........ ... 7.
.... ... . ......... 7.
c�
Ln
r,
............
co
L-- --- --- --
--I - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - —
N 88d 35' 30" W
GRADING PLAN
1/8w = 11-09
Lr
L
57<
L.j
25'— Ott
FRONTYARD SETB
Lu
0
(D
LO
_0
NEW CONC,
STEPS AND
WALK, BROOM
MKIlcu
BUILDING FOOTPRIN
Lu
0 89d32'0"
U)
4—e — - — — - — — - — — - —
102.00'
GRADING NOTES
PROJECT INVOLVES DEIAOLTION OF EXISTING FIRE DAMAGED HOU
AND RECONSTRUCTION OF NEW IDENTICAL NEW STRUCTURE IN
IT'S PLACE. THEREFORE THERE IS NO GRADING INVOLVED.
Q0
rR 8 c El I V E D
2
NOV - 5 1996
PERMIT COUNTER
=10A *" 8 0-TA V
PRCUECT MSCFffqM
RECONSTRUCTION, REMODEL AND
ADDITION TO EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
LECAL DESCRIF11ON
THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE EAST 1/5TH OF THE NORTH HALF
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH,
RANGE 4 E., W.M., EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF.
LOT AREA
MAX. COVERAGE = .35(7,650)=
LOT COVERAGE W/ ADDITION
ZONNG
IRS 8
TAX PARCEL NUMBER
312704-4-003-00-07
nilh
CHRISTOPHER AND ANNA MARIE TILT
23628 76TH AVENUE WEST
EDMONDS, WA 98026
(206) 364-6098
DEMOLMON NOTES-
7,650 SQ FT
2,678 SQ FT
1,487 SQ FT
HEK!Fff CALCULATION
(11 01)+(l 02)+(107)+(106.5)=
416.5/4=104.1=AVG GRADE
MAX HEIGHT = 104.1+25=129.1
ACTUAL HEIGHT 123.75'
I
123 L-AKU Err BCXJTH 4"00
WJFU<L.AN0-. WA 00033
C 2 0 030 8 2 7 /18 5 7
No. Date Revision
w
0
z
w
Q
U)
w
cc:
Itt—
.j
Itt-
YI-
X-1
3::
w
z
<
C6
OD
C-4
CC)
c')
cm w
1. REMOVE EXISTING WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE, CHARRED MATERIAL
CONCRETE FOUNDATION, SLAB AND DAMAGED PAVEMENT AND
DISPOSE OF PROPERLY.
&*et No. G-1
r%r%
Project N0.964V
Datw. 10/20/96
mcEIVED
NOV - 5 1996
PERMIT COUNTER
?(,;� 3,3--
6,-fpfpj N�
N 88d 35' 30 ts w
#q- tJAK 0 1 Z U.L;.
41 -to
1-144 NOSE BAR
1" RADIUS
I
CHESMORE/BUCK
01
c� I
Ln
L
0
1 15'-0"
REAR YARD SETBACK
Ld
0
_0
01
+
ROOF OVERHANG------""
1T2.00 I
Ltloo.00 — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — — - — -
---------------------
N 88d 35' 30" W
SITE PLAN
1/8 w = 1 I -ON
F _9 �Mm -1 �, I �
102.00p
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE REPRODUCED ONLY
ENERGY:
NTH THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE ARCHITECT. AUTHORIZED REPRODUCTIONS MUST BEAR THE
NAME OF THE ARCHITECT. COPYRIGHT 1996 BY CHESMORE/BUCK ARCHITECTURE. THESE
ALL MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
DRAWINGS ARE FULLY PROTECTED BY FEDERAL AND STATE COPYRIGHT LAWS. ANY INFRINGEMENT
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND THE WASHINGTO4 STATE ENERGY CODE, LATEST EDITION.
WILL BE VIGOROUSLY PROSECUTED.
VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING NITH WORK.
ALL CONSTRUCT10N SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (UBC) AND BE IN
APPLICATION AND INSTALLATIONS OF INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIERS SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE OF
ACCORDANCE WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND VARIOUS CODES IMPOSED
WASHINGTON THERMAL INSULATION STANDARDS (H.B. 98).
BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.
WALLS: INSULATED WITH R-19 BATT (FOR 2>6 WALLS) AND R-13 BATT (FOR 2x4 WALLS) (UNLESS
SOLS:-
NOTED OTHERWISE).
UNLESS A SOILS REPORT BY A SOILS ENGINEER IS PROVIDED AND ATTACHED
ROOF AND CEILING: INSULATED WITH R-30 BNTT. PROVIDE INSULATION IN CEILING MERE
THIS OFFICE ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY AS TO THE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOIL.
POSSIBLE AND IN 2X12 RAFTERS IF VAULTED CEILING CONDITION EXISTS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF
FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED ON AN ASSUMED AVERAGE SOIL BEARING OF 2,000 PSF. ALL
2" CLEAR BETWEEN TOP OF INSULATION AND BOTTOM OF SHEATHING FOR VENTING. VENTING MUST
FOOTINGS SHALL BE CAST ON UNDISTURBED FIRM NATURAL SOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL OF 2,000 PSF
OCCUR IN EACH JOIST SPACE. MERE CONTINUOUS VENTING WITHIN A JOIST SPACE IS INTERRUPTED
BEARING CAPACITY AT LEAST V-6" BELOW LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE, FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIALS.
BY A HEADER (I.E.. SKYLIGHT OR AT HIP END,). PROVIDE (2) 1 1/2- VENTING HOLES AT THE TOP OF
FOOTING EXCAVATION SHALL BE FREE OF LOOSE SOILS, DEBRIS, AND FREE WATER AT ALL TIMES. THIS
THE RAFTER AT THE HEADER TO ALLOW FOR CONTINUAL THROUGH—VEN-nNG INTO THE NEXT JOIST SPACE.
OFFICE TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY IN VERIFYING THE ACCURACY OF ENGINEERING DATA SUPPLIED BY
OTHERS.
FLOORS: PROVIDE R-30 BATT INSULATION OVER UNHEATED SPACE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE).
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILRY:
SLAB ON GRADE: PROVIDE EXTRUDED RIGID CLOSED CELL INSULATION R-10. INSULATION TO
PROVIDE THERMAL BREAK BETWEEN SLAB AND FOOTING AND RUN FROM THE TOP OF THE SLAB TO THE
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND STRUCTURAL MEMBER SIZES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING. INSULATION MAY BE INTERRUPTED FOR 6" EVERY 2'-0" TO ALLOW FOR
CONTRACTOR TO INFORM ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE DRAWINGS OR FROM THE CODES.
DOWELING TO TIE SLAB AND FOOTING TOGETHER.
CONTRACTOR INITIATED CHANGES SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE ARCHTECT AND STRUCTURAL
VAPOR BARRIERS: AN APPROVED VAPOR BAFRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EXTERIOR WALLS AND AT
ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION. CHANGES SHOWN ON THE
ALL ROOF DECKS, BELOW ENCLOSED JOIST SPACES WHERE CEILING FINISHES ARE DIRECTLY INSTALLED
DRAWING ONLY WILL NOT SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT.
TO JOISTS, AND ANY OTHER WALL OR CEILING SURFACES WHICH RECEIVE INSULATION. THIS VAPOR
BARRIER MAY BE A COMPONENT OF THE INSULATION MATERIAL. APPLICATION AND INSTALLATIONS OF
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUIRED SAFETY PRECAU11ONS AND THE METHODS,
INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIERS SHALL COWLY WITH STATE OF WASHINGTON THERMAL INSULATION
TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES REQUIRED TO PERFORM HIS WORK.
STANDARDS (H.B. 96).
ALL STUCTURAL SYSTEMS SUCH AS WOOD TRUSSES WHICH ARE TO BE COMPOSED OF COMPONENTS TO
DESION CRITERIA:
BE FIELD ERECTED SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY THE SUPPLIER DURING MANUFACTURING. DELIVERY,
HANDLING, STORAGE AND ERECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER.
ROOF LIVE LOAD: 25 PSF WIND: 20 PFS (80 MPH EXPOSURE B)
FLOOR LIVE LOAD: 40 PSF (60 PSF AT BALCONIES) EARTHQUAKE: ZONE 3
TRUSS LOADS: 20# DL UNIFORM PER LN FT LATERAL EQUIVALENT- 35 PCF AT CANTILEVER WALLS
ROOF LIVE LOAD: 50# LL UNIFORM PER LN FT FLUID PRESSURE: 50 PCF AT BASEMENT WALLS
/".NSTAIR SECT10N
k._�r - I - �w
MANHOLE
DATUM ELEV.
100.00
0
>
<
Q0
CONC
WALK
R5CEIVED
Nov - 5 1996
PERMIT COUNTER
PROJECT DATA
MCUECT IMSCFEMM
RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE SOUTH 75 FEET OF THE EAST 1/5TH OF THE NORTH HALF
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH,
RANGE 4 E., W.M., EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF.
LOT COVERAGE
LOT AREA
MAX. COVERAGE .35(7,650)=
LOT COVERAGE W/ ADDITION
ZONNG
RS 8
JAX PARCEL NUMBER
312704-4-003-00-07
OWNER
CHRISTOPHER AND ANNA MARIE TILT
23628 76TH AVENUE WEST
EDMONDS, WA 98026
(206) 364-6098
DEMOLMON NOTE9
7,650 SQ FT
2,678 SQ FT
1,487 SQ FT
(94)+(94)+(101 - 5)+(101)=
390.5/4=97.6=AVG GRADE
MAX HEIGHT = 97.6+25= 122.6'
ACTUAL HEIGHT 115.75'
1. REMOVE EXISTING WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE, CHARRED MATERIAL
CONCRETE FOUNDATION, SLAB AND DAMAGED PAVEMENT AND
DISPOSE OF PROPERLY.
IW L-AY.0 Err ENDLq'H *100
laFtKL.^NM. WA 00033
C 2 0 0), 8 2 7 / 1 0 5 7
No. Date Revision
w
0
z
w
cl)
w
-0
w
z
z
coo
C-4
0
cm w
SITE PLAN
ShW No. 1.0
ProOd No.9629
Date: 10/28/96
STREET FILE ?& �, ��,5
51re
WIN - 5 1996
V, F, R Wi I "10 0 U N If N