The URL can be used to link to this page

23632 HIGHWAY 99.PDF11111111111111 11549 23632 HIGHWAY 99 F�<OM GRAMOR (206)672-0622 8.21.1990 8:21 ORRHOR DEUELOPMENT, INC. 4211 200th S,W. #202 LynnLV00d, WR 98036 (206) 774-ooge (206) 672-0622 FRH To: T-T— rAH -z-sa - S4"71 a ate; 1 1610 sent By: # Of Pages Including this sheet: Remarks: (#24). 60-4 -S�, AP PV-c.,,JA.L— RV YA I p . 1 2 j 2 1,4 6 ot-4-n4s 'Dv� M44p, ;?,Po&j- A k- , �2 6,0w 1?a -r\4 7.1 Ps RAPID LETTER FROM TO SUBJECT 5. DATE �0 /Ai- az;4�eaJ REPLY DATE SIGNED TOPS NO. 3701 LITHO - USA RECIPIENT: REPLY ON PINK COPY — RETAIN WHITE COPY DATE: TECHNICAL REVIEW STAFF: MAy 01? &VI o Project C has been scheduled for �/o Review. Such review should be'completed and comments and/or approvals returned to MARY PETRO by Monica McLaughlin C-9 'P IC,�02- .. �l fax M. b�s io -� A-aw tq TO BuojE,CT Z. RE Ck E' -D jV11) I*-? 119SO CLERICAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r- DATE 9,0 MESSAGE 4.� W,:�, /eve %&Aoo, SIGNED ops 9 FORM3801 LITHOINUSA RECIPIENT: REPLY ON PINK COPY — RETAIN WHITE COPY -- 0" 0 ADDRESS: 1-.1 TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver E] Study Required E] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #IS: AQB 1999-115, AQB 1999-147, SD 2001-102, ADB 2002-47, ADB 2002-202 DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): 19960606(tnnt imp) 199607S7(sign) 19970434(sign) 19970660(sign) 19980270(sign) 19980387(sign) 19980420(mech) 19980515(sign) 19990123(alt int) 19990127(demo int) 19990130(fire sprnkir) 19990153(mech) 19990154(alt int) 19960185(mech) JL9990332(alt int) 19990333(alt int) 19990365(mech) 19990388(sign) 19990414(l!lumb) 19990419(sign) 19990447(mech) 19990546(tnnt imp) 19990629(sign) 19990756(fire sup)20000065(tnnt imp)20000069(sign)20000346(sign)20000403(aI int)2000043S(mech)20010466(mech)20010601(tnnt imp)20010674(fire sRrnkir)20010825(sign) 20020030(demo int)20020049(mech)20020105(mech)20020106(tnnt imR) 20 20107(plumb)20020114ILire alarm)20020116(fire sRrnkir)20020200(sign)20020967(sign)20020969(sign)20030134(sign) 20030388(sign)20040102(tnnt imp)20040127(fire sRrnkir)20040188(sign)20040257(plumb)20050691(demo int)20050734 tnnt imp)20050753(alt int)20050754((pavinq)20050772(plumb)20050777(plumb) 20050816(sign)20050834(fire sprnklr)20050837(fire supp)20050890(sign)20050929(sign) PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: �t± 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION-236th Street/SR-104 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... ZMM DATE .......... 09/06/89 TIME .......... 4:45-5:45 PM PEAK COMMENT ....... Future 1990 without project + 3% annual Growth Rate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 20 25 85 35 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 70 25 1235 780 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 35 30 20 50 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 5 4 3 7 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 2.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 3 WB -3.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y .25.8 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x NB LT, x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x WB LT x SB LT x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.517 0.167 16.0 C 16.0 C WB LTR 0.329 0.167 14.5 B 14.5 B NB -L 0.220 0.733 2.0 A 2.5 A TR 0.557 0.733 2.5 A 8B L 0.315 0.733 2.6 A 2.0 A TR 0.370 0.733 1.9 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 3.3 (sec/veh) VIC = 0.550 LOS = A C-7 ) I f I L� V--� ev.-A lv� 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION-236th Street/SR-104 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... ZMM DATE .......... 09/06/89 TIME .......... 4:45-5:45 PM PEAK COMMENT ....... Future 1990 with project + 3% Annual Growth rate -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 20 25 85 42 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 79 34 1247 790 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 35 37 20 50 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 5 4 3 7 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.-0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 2.00 0.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 3 WB -3.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y -25.8 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 13.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 13.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 -PH-4 EB LT x NB LT x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x WB LT x SB LT x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB LTR 0.554 0.167 16.5 C 16.5 C WB LTR 0.398 0.167 14.9 B 14.9 B NB L 0.224 0.733 2.0 A 2.5 A TR 0.563 0.733 2.5 A SB L 0.391 0.733 3.4 A 2.0 A TR 0.375 0.733 1.9 A ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- INTERSECTION: Delay 3.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.561 LOS.= A 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 236th Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... SR-99 NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 5:00-6:00 PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Tuesday 08/29/89 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- LEFT 3 27 42 ---- 19 THRU 2 4 1668 1026 RIGHT 24 17 21 30 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 2 2 LANE USAGE LTR LTR* ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- -4.00 ---------- 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION, AND RV'S ----------- VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 ------------- 0 ------------- 0 - WESTBOUND 0 4 0 NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 EB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.80. 5.80 0.00 5.80 NB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.80 MINOR THROUGHS WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 EB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 EB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 43 45 34 > 34 > -9 > F THROUGH 6 60 47 > 52 47 > -24 41 >F E RIGHT 27 344 344 > 344 > 317 > B MINOR STREET EB LEFT 2 45 31 > 31 > > E THROUGH 2 60 47 > 158 47 > 135 45 >D E RIGHT 19 530 530 > 530 -> 511 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 42 252 252 252 209 C SB LEFT 19 115 115 115 �6 E 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------- 7 ---------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................................. I AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 236th Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... SR-99 NAME OF THE ANALYST ............................... ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 5:00-6:00 PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION: Future 1990 without project + 3% GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 5 30 45 20 THRU 5 5 1720 1055 RIGHT 25 20 25 35 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 2 2 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ------- ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND -4.00 ---------- 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ----------- 0 ------------- 0 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 4 0 NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 EB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.80' 5.80 0.00 5.80 NB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.80 MINOR THROGGHS WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 EB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 EB 7.90 7.90 0.00' 7.90 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 48 45 THROUGH 8 60 RIGHT 32 331 MINOR STREET EB LEFT 4 45 THROUGH 4 60 RIGHT 20 519 MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 45 241 SB LEFT 20 115 32 46 331 30 46 519 241 115 > 32 > -15 > F > 50 46 > -37 38 >F E > 331 > 299 > C > 30 > > 107 46 > > 519 > 241 115 26 "> E 79 -4 2 > E E 499 >'A. 195 D 95 E (f) 11, f 0 "// 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 236th Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... SR-99 NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 5:00-6:00 PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION: Future 1990 with project + 3% GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 39 45 20 THRU 5 5 1748 10-81 RIGHT 25 20 34 35 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB St ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 2 2 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (it) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- -4.00 ---------- 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ----------- 0 ------------- 0 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 4 0 NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 EB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.80- 5.80 0.00 5.80 NB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.80 MINOR THROUGHS WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 EB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 EB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 62 45 32 > 32 > - 3 0 > J, THROUGH 8 60 45 > 46 45 > -55 _36 >F E RIGHT 32 322 322 > 322 > 290 > C MINOR STREET EB LEFT 4 45 29 > .29 > 25 F THROUGH 4 60 45 > 106 45 > 78 41 >E E RIGHT 20 509 509 > 509 -> 489 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 45 232 232 232 187 D SB LEFT 20 115 115 115 95 E 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR, ................................ I AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 236TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... 84TH AVENUE W NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION.TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORT.H/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 30 5 5 15 THRU 50 45 230 90 RIGHT 15 25 5 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ------- -ANGLE ---------- FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ----------- VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 ------------- 1 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5..70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph). c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MINOR STREET EB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MAJOR STREET NB LEFT SB LEFT 5 479 45 584 25 858 30 482 51 592 15 992 5 998 15 952 445 > 445 > 439 > A 577 > 634 577 > 558 532 >A A 858 > 858 > 832 > A 446 584 992 998 952 > 446 > -41-6 > _& > 566 584 > 470 534 >A A > 992 >- 977 > A 998 952 993 937 A A 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ...................... 236TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... 84TH AVENUE W NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: Future 1990 without project + 3% GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 35 5 5 15 THRU 55 50 235 95 RIGHT 15 30 5 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ------- ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 ---------- 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ----------- VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 ------------- 1 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 SOUTHBOUND .0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2)* -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 .6.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 5 469 433 > 433 > 428 > A THROUGH 51 577 570 > 632 570 > 546 519 >A A RIGHT 30 853 853 > 853 > 822 > A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 35 469 430 > 430 > aU > B THROUGH 56 584 577 > 547 577 > 441 521 >A —A RIGHT 15 987 987 > 987 X 972 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 5 997 997 997 992 A SB LEFT 15 947 947 947 932 A ll�o "J/ ral 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 236TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH'STREET ................... 84TH AVENUE W NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: Future 1990 with project + 3% GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- LEFT 35 ---- ---- ---- 5 5 15 THRU 71 66 263 121 RIGHT 15 30 5 25 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- 0.00 ---------- 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RI'GHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 5 424 379 > 379 > 374 > B THROUGH 67 539 532 > 581 532 > 479 465 >A A RIGHT 30 825 825 > 825 > 794 > A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 35 424 377 > 377 > -341 > B THROUGH 72 545 538 > 503 538 > 381 467 >B A RIGHT 15 960 960 > 960 >- 945 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 5 993 993 993 988 A SB LEFT 15 920 920 920 905 A --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection 'Prepared 228th Street 0 84th i Designed by: Zaher Mekkaoui 11 by 'Checked by 'Date UK TLG 1M U L T I - W A Y 1 S T 0 P I K T 9 R S 9 C T 10 N 1 of Inallsis 'Date of Coun 09106189 Rxisting conditions IL 0 S / C A P A C I T Y C A h C U h A T I O'K F 0 R K - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D A T A I K P 0 T 'Step 1 'last Leg Volume : 120 iRight-Turn Volume last Leg : 20 Suit X_W ast L g = 120 'West Leg Volume 1 z 90 'Right -Turn Volume 1 West Leg : 20 ----------------- 100 :30.2 % 'Sum est Leg : o th eg : 90 155 'North Leg Volume 1 : 155 'Right -Turn Volume 1 North Leg Total VoluRe 35 o th Leg : R Leg RT : 330 20 1 ISouth Leg Volume : 330 lRight-Turn Volume 1 South Leg 25 Sum Total RY W Leg RT : N Leg RT : 20 35 Total : 695 Total 1 ----------------- 100 :14.3 % 100 ISum Total Volume S Leg RT : 1% Trucks : 'Area 25 2 ----------------------------------- Area Type: ----------- 2 'Step IPercent Type z 2 1 2 1 of Commercial Vehicles (Trucks 4 Buses) 2.00 ----- CBD ---- Others -- 1 2 'Step 3 lIntersection Capacity From Chart Below ...... 1 CBD 1547 1 2 Other 'Intersection Type 2 2 'Step 4 ----- ----- 'Chart Capacity * Right -Turn Adj. (+0.2% Per 1% RT) : 1591 ----- 'Intersection Type: 2 2 'Step 5 'Step 4 * 0.95 (CBD/Interm. Areas) or 1.0 for others :1591 'Step 6 1 'Step 7 'Step 5 * Commercial Vehicle adj. H% Per 1% T&B) : 1559 DRMAND SPLIT To 30 1 lvjwv I 'Total Inters. Vol. / Adj. Capac. Vol. : V/C Ratio - 0.44 �c --------- ----------------------------------------------------- lint Typel 2t2 2*3 2*4 3*3 4*4 - ------------------------------- 'LOS-CRITHRII FOR 4-WAY STOP --- V/C Ratio ---------- --- Split --- --- --- --- LOS A : 0.00 TO 0.53 B : 0.53 TO 0.66 C : 0.66 TO 0.78 50/50 1900 2180 2460 2450 3000 D : 0.78 TO 0.91 R : 0.91 TO 1.00 55/45 1789 2088 2386 2264 2738 F ) 1.00 60/40 1678 1995 2312 2077 2476 65/35 1612 1944 2277 1956 2300 'This Intersection Operate 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 70/30 1547 1895 2241 1635 2124 lat L.O.S ------------- RRFEREHCRS: ------------ The methodology presented in this table is based on the following publications 01 Jaiues Reber ' S Study of Four -Way Stop Intersection Capacities. 'h cord 7, Highway esearch Board, Washington, D.C. (1963). Rig way Researc Re 2 R 12 Inergy_Saving Traffic Operations Project Manual. Barton Aschman Associates Inc., lvanston, III. (Sept. 1981) 13 Highway Capacity Manual -Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1985) 14 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Rigway Research Board, Washington D.C., (1965) #5 Hannson RT AL. " Capacity of Unsignalized Intersections-Swedish.Cagacity Manual" Tran;rtation Research Record 667, Transportation Rese rc Board, Washingion, D. . (1980) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection 'Prepared 228th Street @ 84th 'Designed by: Zaher Mekkaoui by 'Checked b y 'Date ZHK TLG 1M 9 L T I - W A Y S T 0 P I N T I R S 9 C T 1 0 K of Anal C 'Date of oun vis 09/06/89 Future 1990 without project + 3% GF IL 0 S / C A P i C I T Y C A L C U L A T 1 0 N F 0 R M D A T A ------------------------------- I N P U T iStep I - - - -- ilast Leg Volume - --- ----------- ------ 125 iRight-Turn Volume ---- --- East Leg - -- 20 1 Sun I-W ast L g : 125 1 lWest Leg Volume 95 'Right -Turn Volume West Leg 20 1 ----------------- 100 :30.1 est Leg : o th eg : 95 165 'North Leg Volume : 165 'Right -Turn Volume North Leg 40 'Sum Total Volume South Leg : 9 Leg RT : 345 20 'South Leg Volume : 345 'Right -Turn Volume South Leg : 25 San Total RT 1 W Leg RT : 20 1 ----------------- 100 :14.3 % N Leg RT : 40 Total : 730 Total : 105 'Sum Total Volume 1S Leg RT : % Trucks : 'Area Type z 25 2 2 --------- ---------------------------------------------------------- step 2 Percent of Commercial Vehicles (Trucks + 'Area Type: ----------- > 2 Buses) 2.00 1 ----- 1 I 1 CBD ---- 1 Others -- I 2 IStep 3 'Intersection Capacity From Chart Below ----- 1 : CBD 1547 2 : Other 'Intersection Type 2 2 'Step 4 'Chart Capacity * Right -Turn Adj. (+0.2% Per 1% RT) : 1591 Type: 2 2 'Step 5 'Step 4 t 0.95 (CBD/Interm. Areas) or 1.0 for others :1591 'Step 6 'Step 5 t Commercial Vehicle adj. (-I% Per 1% T&B) : 1559 DEMAND SPLIT 70 30 'Step 7 'Total Inters. Vol. / Adj. Capac. Vol. : V/C Ratio : 46 (19 ------------------------------- ILOS-CRITIRIA FOR 4-WAY STOP I I ---------------------------------------------------------- lint Typel 2*2 2*3 2*4 3*3 4*4 1 Y/C Ratio --- ----- --- --- --- --- --- LOS A : 0.00 TO 0.53 Split I I I I I I B : 0.53 TO 0.66 C : 0.66 TO 0.78 1 50/50 1 1900 2180 2460 2450 3000 D : 0.78 TO 0.91 9 : 0.91 TO 1.00 55/45 1 1789 II 2088 2386 2264 2738 1 F > 1.00 60/40 1 1678 1995 2312 2077 2476 ------------------------------- 1 65/35 1 1612 1944 2277 1956 2300 'This Intersection Operate 70/30 1 1547 1895 2241 1835 2124 lat LAS ------------- ) A -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REFERENCES: ------------ The methodology presented in this table is based on the following publications 11 Jac ues Heber , *S Study of Four -Way Stop Intersection Capacities. RgMy Research Record 27, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1963). #2 Knergy_Saving Traffic Operations Project Manual. Barton Aschman Associates Inc., Evanston, 111. (Sept. 1981) #3 Highway Capacity Manual -Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1985) #4 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Higmay Research Board, Washington D.C., (1965) #5 Hannson, IT AL. ' ' Capacity of Unsignalized Intersections -Swedish Ca Manual* oTrans�ortation Research Record 667, Transportation Researlaciatyrd, Washingi n I D. . (1980) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection 228th Street @ 84th Designed by: Zaher Mekkaoui 'Prepared by ZMM 'Checked by TLG IN U L T I - W A Y S T 0 P I v T I R S I C T 1 0 K 'Date of Analysis 09/06/89 1 1 'Date of Count Future 1990 with project f 3% G? IL 0 S / C I P I C I T Y C I L C U L I T 10 K F 0 R K D A T A I H P U T 'Step I 'last Leg Volume : 127 illight-Turn Volume Rast Leg 20 Sum R ------------------------------- I I _W ast Leg : 127 Nest Leg Volume z 98 'Right -Turn Volume West Leg 23 ----------------- 100 =28.6 est L g z 98 1 1 'Sum Total Volume 0 th Leg z 18 'North Leg Volume : 186 'Right -Turn Volume North Leg 40 outh eg : 373 1 1 R Leg RT : 20 'South Leg Volume : 373 'Right -Turn Volume South Leg 27 Sum Total RT W Leg RT : 23 1 1 1 ----------------- 100 :14.0 % H Leg RT : 40 Total : 784 Total 110 'Sum Total Volume I S Leg RT : 27 1% Trucks : 2 --------- I ---------------------------------------------------------- 11rea Type: ----------- 2 'Area Type : 2 'Step 2 'Percent of Commercial Vehicles (Trucks + Buses) 2.00 ----- I CBD ---- I I I - 1 z CBD Others -- 2 'Step 3 'Intersection Capacity From Chart Below 2 : Other I I (ED I I 'Intersection Type 2 2 'Step 4 'Chart Capacity * Right -Turn Adj. (40.2% Per 1% RT) : 159 ----- ----- I I .-! k, Intersection Type: 2 2 'Step 5 'Step 4 * 0.95 (CBD/Interm. Areas) or-4—. Mor—others :i�i I I I I ------ V51 o I 'Step 6 IStep 5 * Commercial Vehicle adj. (-I% Per 1% T&B) : 6f D SPLIT 70 30 1 1 _J_� ---- 11 MY 'Step 7 lTotal Inters. Vol. / Adj. Capac. Vol. : V/C Ratio : Q:.51 1) __1 _ I ----------- --- ----- ---- 'LOS-CRITRRII FOR 4-WAY STOP -------------------------------------- - --- I I ----------------- V/C Ratio lint Type 2*2 2*3 2*4 30 04 ---------- --- : ----- I --- --- --- --- --- LOS A : 0.00 TO 0.53 SRlit I I I B : 0.53 TO 0.66 C : 0.66 TO 0.78 D : 0.78 TO 0.91 1 50/50 1 1900 2180 2460 2450 3000 1 : 0.91 TO 1.00 55/45 1 1789 2088 2386 2264 2738 F 1.00 II ------------------------------- 60/40 1 1678 1995 2312 2077 2476 65/35 1 1612 1944 2277 1956 2300 'This Intersection Operate 70/30 1 1895 2241 1835 2124 lat L.O.S ----- 7 ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RURRINCKS: ------------ The methodology presented in this table is based on the following publications #1 Jac ues Reber , "S Study of Four -Way Stop Intersection Capacities. RiRvay Research Record 27, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1963). 92 Knergy_Saving Traffic Operations Project Manual. Barton Ischman Associates Inc., Ivanston, III. (Sept. 1981) 03 Highway Capacity Manual -Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1985) #4 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Higway Research Board, Washington D.C., (1965) #5 Hannson, RT AL. " Capacity of Unsignalized Intersections -Swedish Ca�acity Manual", Transp;rtation Research Record 667, Transportation Researc Board, Washington, D.C. (1980) 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ....................... 238TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... SR-104 NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 4:45-5:45 PM PEAK OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Wednesday 08/30/89 count INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 9 8 17 77 THRO 8 7 106*8 662 RIGHT 18 126 57 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 2 3 2 LANE USAGE LTR LT + R ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ------- ANGLE ---------- FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 4.00 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND -4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ----------- VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 ------------- 14 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 1 0 NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 EB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MINOR THROUGHS WB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 EB 7.10 7.10 0.00 .7.10 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 EB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 60 38 > 45 38 > 33 32 >E_�. THROUGH 6 75 58 > 58 > 53 > E RIGHT 101 634 634 634 533 A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 18 60 40 > 40 > 21 > E THROUGH 16 75 58 > 90 58 > 18 42 >E E RIGHT 37 678 678 > 678 X 641 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 17 508 508 508 491 A SB LEFT 79 283 283 283 205' c 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ...................... 238TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... SR-104 NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: FUTURE 1990 W/O PROJECT + 3 % GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- LEFT 10 ---- 10 ---- 20 ---- 80 THRU 10 10 1100 685 RIGHT 20 130 60 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 2 3 2 LANE USAGE LTR LT + R ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ------- ANGLE ---------- FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 4.00 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND -4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ----------- 0 ------------- 14 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 1 0 NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 EB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MINOR THROUGHS WB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 EB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 EB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 8 60 35 > 43 35 > 27 _�D_>E E THROUGH 8 75 56 > 56 > 48 > E RIGHT 105 623 623 623 518 A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 20 60 37 > 37 > 17 > E THROUGH 20 75 56 > 84 56 > 2 36 >E E RIGHT 41 667 667 > 667 > 626 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 20 493 493 493 473 A SB LEFT 82 270 270 270 188 D f---- CD ( q 10 V4 fl&oowt-T,- 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 238TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... SR-104 NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: FUTURE 1990 W/PROJECT + 3 % GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------- ------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- LEFT 10 ---- 10 ---- 20 ---- 110 THRU 10 10 1087 672 RIGHT 20 162 60 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 2 3 2 LANE USAGE LTR LT + R ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ------- ANGLE ---------- FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 4.'00 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND -4.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ----------- VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 ------------- 14 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 1 0 NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 2 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 EB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 NB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MINOR THROUGHS WB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 EB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 EB 7.60 7.60 0.00 7.60 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) C = C v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 8 60 30 > 37 30 > 21 22 >E E THROUGH 8 75 49 > 49 > > _E RIGHT 130 627 627 627 497 A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 20 60 31 > 31 > 11 > E THROUGH 20 75 49 > 72 49 > -10 28 >F E RIGHT 41 673 673 > 673 > 632 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 20 502 502 502 482 A SB LEFT 112 275 275 275 163. D f �ajTyya 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION ................................... 150000 ,NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 238th Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... 84TH AVENUE NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: Existing condition INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- LEFT 45 20 ---- 10 ---- 60 THRU 95 95 115 35 RIGHT 5 80 25 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ------- VALUE . ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP 7 MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 20 542 469 > 469 > 449 > A THROUGH 96 680 651 > 718 651 > 521 555 >A A RIGHT 81 966 966 > 966 > 885 > A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 45 482 398 > 398 > -Asp > THROUGH 96 675 647 > 547 .647 > 401 551 >A A RIGHT 5 998 998 > 998 > 993 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 10 1000 1000 1000 990 A SB LEFT 61 994 994 994 933 A e " (D3 li5--" 6-�- 14", 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 238TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... 84TH AVENUE W NAME OF THE ANALYST ................. ............ ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/o6/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: Future 1990 without project + 3% GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 45 20 10 65 THRU 100 100 120 40 RIGHT 5 85 30 15 NUMBER OF.LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------------------ i -------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ----------------- EASTBOUND ------- 0.00 ---------- 90 ---------------- 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ----------- 0 ------------- 1 ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 1 0 NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE . Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 20 524 447 > 447 > 427 > A THROUGH 101 665 634 > 704 634 > 497 533 >A A RIGHT 86 958 958 > 958 > 872 > A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 45 463 375 > 375 > �ju > THROUGH 101 658 628 > 528 628 > 377 527 >B A RIGHT 5 998 998 > 998 >_ 993 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 10 1000 1000 1000 990. A SB LEFT 66 993 993 993 927 A 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... 238TH STREET SW NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... 84TH AVENUE W NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. ZMM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 09/06/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION: Future 1990 with project + 3% GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB ---- NB SB ---- LEFT 45 29 ---- 10 ---- 91 THRU 130 132 120 40 RIGHT 5 113 39 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ------- ANGLE ---------- FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ---------------- 20 ----------------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ----------- VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 ------------- ------------- 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 EB 5.70 5.70 0.00 5.70 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.10 NB 5.10 5-10 0.00 5.10 MINOR THROUGHS WB 6.30 6.30 0.00 6.30 EB 6.30 6.30 0.00 .6.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 EB 6.80 6.80 0.00 6.80 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MINOR STREET EB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MAJOR STREET NB LEFT SB LEFT 29 480 383 > 383 > 354 > B 133 639 600 > 661 600 > 385 466 >B A 114 954 954 > 954 > 839 > A 45 401 297 > 297 > 2-5-1 > C,' 131 629 591 > 478 591 > 296 459 >C A 5 998 998 > .998 X 993 > A 10 1000 1000 1000 990 A 92 991 991 991 899 A 4C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... PRIMARY ENTRA14CE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... SR-99 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. T GIBSON DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) ...... 10/23/89 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION .... FUTURE 1990 CONDITIONS W/PROJECT + 3 % GF INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- - ---- LEFT 71 71 0 q,() Ae Pon Sl THRU 0 0 69 RIGHT 73 0 1019 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ----------------- EASTBOUND ------- 0.00 ---------- 90 ---------------- 20 N WESTBOUND ----- --- --- NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ---------- 7 ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND --- --- --- NORTHBOUND 0 1 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 1 0 CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------- 7 ----------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ EB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.80 MINOR LEFTS EB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ...... PRIMARY ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET .... SR-99 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS ..... 10/23/89 PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION .... FUTURE 1990 CONDITIONS W/PROJECT + 3 % GF Jk I .' 'w - I .-V . CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 71 279 223 223 152 D RIGHT 73 508 508 508 4-3-5 IT MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 72 264 264 264 192 D IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ...... PRIMARY ENTRANCE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET .... SR-99 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS ..... 10/23/89 ; PM PEAK HOUR OTHER INFORMATION .... FUTURE 1990 CONDITIONS W/PROJECT + 3 % GF �t-4 C. 18 9 11 July 15, 2002 -CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 1 (425) 771-0220 * FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwdedmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering Safeway National Retail Partners 10135 SE Sunnyside Road, #250 Clackamas, OR 97015 RE: Safewav Marketplace Store Located in Edmonds, W Dear Property Owner, GARY HAAKENSON--- MAYOR Our records indicate that you are the owners of the subject property at Highway 99 and 236h Street SW in Edmonds, Washington. We have received a complaint that "near misses" have occurred near your store entrance along 236th Street SW. The pavement markings at this ingress and egress location have worn off, and some drivers perceive this access point as having three lanes while others perceive it as only having two lanes. In order to reduce the hazard and enhance public safety, the City of Edmonds is requesting that you restripe the ingress and egress channelization at this access location. This should significantly enhance public safety and reduce your liability. We encourage you to complete this work by the end of the summer. Please feel free to call me with any questions at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1328. Sincerely, DARRELL C. SMITH, P.E. Traffic Engineer DCS/cmc c: Jason Tourtellot, Code Enforcement Officer David K. Gebert, City Engineer Jim Kammerer, Street Division Manager S:WNGR\DARRELLkTrafric*Concem\Safeway LMcr.&c * Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan AV MEMORANDUM Date: June 28, 1999 To: File ADB-99-1 15 Street File 23632 Hwy 99 suite#Al Plan Check # From: Steve Bullock -W� Senior Planner Subject: ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR SIGN REPLACEMENT. Since the proposed sign is a replacement of an existing individual letter sign, and because it is within the area allowed for its tennant space, and because the proposed sign colors and design are determined to be consistant with existing signs and design of the building, Planning Staff administratively approves the design of the Papa Murphy's Pizza sign at 23632 Highway 99 #Al. City of Edmonds cQ Planning Division 99032SR 'DOC 06/28/99. PLANNING DATA NAME: SITE ADDRESS: q —DATE: ±E. ZONING: r PLAN CHK�. C, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: '2- U\j USE(S) PROPOSED:—t6 — P'Lt ALLOWED?: LEGA� NONQPNFORMING LAND USE DOTERMINATION ISSUED11A (Y/N) CUP File: IV in ADS FILE [A OR DATE WAIVED: PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: PARKING use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) Total Required: Actual Provided: SETBACKS: Required Setbacks- A114 Front: Left Side:_ Right SIde:_Rear: Actual Setbacks: Front: Left Side: -Right Side: Rear: Street map checked for additional setback required? —(Yes/No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Maximum Allowed Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed:-O -Actual Height: — Modulation Allowed?-' Modulation Height: Datum Point: ---Datum Elevation: — LANDSCAPING: Matches ADS approved: - Bond: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS GAfi1c3%permPrPLANDAa.D0C C over ) a SEPA DETERMINATION: VIA, SHORELINE REQUIRED?: 1A LOT AGGREGATION REQUIREM: i cAfflas\parmi\t^FLANDAc,D0C Adh .rN. - The following items are required with your permit application: I EXI I I 00 I I [X1 This form must be submitted with the application • traffic study must be submitted with the application • traffic study is not required • Development Application Review Fee must be paid $ • Development Application Review Fee is not required Route application to DPW for review Do not route application to DPW 1 . DATE 5C 7 1Y 2. s T Z/V R I-F 3. DEVELOPER /"y 4. REPRESENTATIVE 5. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT t,2 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT Z'wu�z SIZE 7. LOCATION OF SITE 9,2: AREA 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING 9. DEVELOPMENT'S ROAD SYSTEM (TSA) 10. BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ANY EXISTING INFORMATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER: I KI A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED (The developer may choose to perform a traffic study, however, to show that the proposed development does not place three or more peak hour trips through a specific location) I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED (See Traffic Study Checklist C-4200-2 for specifics) I A REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED (Se egionaL Traffic Study Checklist C-4200-5 for specifics) 17 7 TY 0 ISH COUNTY DATE FOR DEViLbPER DATE REVISED MARCH 7, 1991 PAGE 1 OF 2 CHECKLIST C-4200-1 YELLOW COPY - APPLICANT PINK COPY - DPW FILE 11. BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT AT THE PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOLLOWING TRAFFIC IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND WILL REQUIRE IMPACT MITIGATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, IT WILL BE INDICATED BELOW. 12. COMMENTS/OTHER PERTINENT DATA DISCUSSED:- a-s a" -c 7 c -27-71 SNOHOMIS� COUNTY DATE FOR DEVELOPER DATE REVISED MARCH 7, 1991 PAGE 2 OF 2 CHECKLIST C-4200-1 YELLOW COPY - APPLICANT PINK COPY - DPW FILE 0 ST, 0 0 A 0 cfn) _AL-� 0(5. OFFICE WILLIS D. TUCKER PROJECT Countv Executive 0 OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4th Floor, County Administration Building Everett, Washington 98201 259-9388 or 259-9311 Tall Free: 1-800-562-4367 Scan Prefix: 649 ADDRESS. AZ(R�OAVA PLEASE BE 'AWARE THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECTr All construction is subject to fie] d inspections, corrections and final field approval. The issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the building being occupied. No concrete shall be poured without inspections. Notify the Division of Inspection Compliance at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance. An approved set of plans shall be kept at -the job site at all times during con-,' struction. A separate permit shall be require d for mechanical -heating and venting systems. A separate permit shall be required for plumbing work.' 11K, To Obtai n., electrical permit and' -inspection contact the*State Department of Labor t Industries, Electrical Division at (206) ZE4- 2,992- Use of Building: &F4-1/m 2A4X_T Construction Type: basemenL rirst ,)zor�y �)econa btory Third Story Area: Occ. Group: Occ. Load: Area:-/ A66 SF Occ. Group: Occ. Load: 36 Area: 0 cc.*Group: Occ. Load: Area: Occ. Group: Occ. Load: If we can be of any further *assistance to you, please feel free to contact US. Date: Plan Check#. Code Compifiance Inspector DIVISION OF TECHNICAL REVIEW DIVISION OF INSPECTION & COMPLIANCE a.m. - 5 p.m. a,68-;-3_Tf1 8'-a.m. - 9 a.m. DIVISION OF DIVISION OF' DIVISION OF INFORMATION . SERVICES TECHNICAL REVIEW INSPECTION & COMPLIANCE ? lo SNOHOMISH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF V PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE REVI THIS BOX FOR COUNTY USE ONLY IP-z-', eg 09.4 x IC ZiRKS FOR NOTICE TO CDD COUNTER STAFF AND PERMIT APPLICANT: The following items are required with your permit application: [X] This form must be submitted with the application A traffic study must be submitted with the application [X] A traffic study is not required A Development Application Review Fee must be paid $ [X] A Development Application Review Fee is not required Routs application to DPW for review Do not route application to DPW 1 DATE 2. S T ;� 7 R 3. DEVELOPER j�� 2 /0,0CW et:L%� 4. REPRESENTATIVE 5. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT "6 r,2 Ire T- 1 1.74 if zew SIZE 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT &5 0 --!!!V 74 7. LOCATION OF SITE es e Ale-ryl 03,� '51 'e. 4) 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA 9. DEVELOPMENT'S ROAD SYSTEM (TSA) 10. BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ANY EXISTING INFORMATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER: I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED (The developer may choose to perform a traffic study, however, to show that the proposed development does not place three or more peak hour trips through a specific location) I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED (See Traffic Study Checklist C-4200-2 for specifics) C I A REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED (See Regional Traffic Study Checklist C-4200-5 for specifics) ZSNOMISH COUNTY DATE DE 0 4PE D ��E REVISED MARCH 7, 1991 PAGE 1 OF 2 CHECKLIST C-4200-1 YELLOW COPY - APPLICANT PINK COPY - DPW FILE 11. -4ASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDEC(RY THE APPLICANT AT THE PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOL,Li)WfNG TRAFFIC IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND WILL REQUIRE IMPACT MITIGATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REEDED TO DETERMINE IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, IT WILL BE INDICATED BELOW. FUTURE CAPACITY: 12. COMMENTS/OTHER PERTINENT DATA DISCUSSED:- Zpv /'? IV j s REVISED MARCH 7, 1991 YELLOW COPY - APPLICANT PAGE 2 OF 2 CHECKLIST C-4200-1 PINK COPY - DPW FILE I OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 41h Floor, County Administration Building Everett, Washington 98201 259-9388 or 259-9311 Toll Free: 1-800-562-4367 Scan Prefix: 649 IN WILLIS D. TUCKER PROJECT N County Executive ADDRESS A -A PLEASE BE AWARE THAT -THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECTr All construction is subject to field inspections, corrections and final field approval. The issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the building being occupied. No concrete shall be poured without inspections. Notify the Division of Inspection Compliance at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance. An approved set of plans shall be kept at --the job site at all times during con- struction. P< A separate permit.shall be required for mechanical heating and venting systems. A sep*arate permit shall be required for plumbing work. To obtain electrical permit and'inspection contact the State Department of Labor & industries, Electrical Division at (2o6) ZS-47 2,99Z Use of Building: g�0 'A Construction Type: DdbemenL rirsT z)-cory ')econa btory Third Story Area: Occ. Group: Occ. Load: Area: 1196 Occ. Group: Occ-. Load: Area: Occ. Group: Occ. Load: Area: Oc'c. Group: Occ. Load: If we.can be of.any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact US. Date Plan Check Igo,- c Code Co liance Inspector DIVISION OF TECHNICAL REVIEW DIVISION OF INSPECTION & COMPLIANCE 3" -39-PO 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.* . a88`-351'1. 8**a.m. - 9 a.m. DIVISION'OF DIVISION OF DIVISION OF INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICAL REVIEW INSPECTIO14 COMPLIANCE SNOHOMISH Serving the Public Health of Snohomish County and its Incorporated Cities and Towns HEALTH M. WARD HINDS, M.D., M.P.H., DISTRICT Health Officer Vital Statistics (206) 339-5280 Administration Office . (206) 339-5210 Clinic Service (206) 339-5220 Community Health Division (206) 339-5230 Sanitation Program (206) 339-5270 Environmental Health Division (206) 339-5250 FAX (206) 339-5216 October 16, 1991 Bob Christensen 3417 228th S.E. Bothell, Washington 98021 Subject: Proposed, Mr. C's Espresso Bar, 1715 228th S.E., Bothell Dear Mr. Christensen: Your plans have been reviewed for compliance with the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Health, and with the policies of the Snohomish Health District. With the addition of the following items, the plans are approved. All equipment must be new and listed by the National Sanitation Foundation. The use of used equipment will require prior written approval by Snohomish Health District. 2. All interior cabinetry must meet the Architectural Woodwork Institute Quality Standards. 3. The Health District operating permit. application process has been completed. The permit will be issued after a pre -operational inspection verifies compliance with the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Health for Food Service Sanitation. A pre -operational inspection -is required prior to opening for business. Please contact the Food Section office about one week in advance to schedule an appointment. If there are an y significant changes or additions to your layout or equipment, the Snohomish Health District must be notified. - Please contact me if you have any questions. My office number is 339-5250. Sincerely, Rick Za alka, R.S. Environmental Health Specialist RZ:sei Snohomish County Building Department Environmental Health Division, 3020 Rucker Ave., Suite 102, Everett, WA 98201-3971 ser, Vor FRUITLAND ACRES DIV 2- [.'FRUITLAND ACRES,."".TO "LAKE BALLINGER TO LAKE BALLINGER (4A 20 If L 2-36th. ST S.W 0 B 8 7 �rW-L7,LOW LLI ww A 7 to cord*) 00 01 11 OV >< f6997) LA MIRAa S 21 - 15', 7 6 6 0) R 231 C) �/64) 5 (6/22 lf� Ir 2 4 5 4 DIV 4 At A I A A A DD fA Vf u I C, 12 1 WLEL 02 0/ 6 5 4 01-ev,R Z31(6/2-2/64) JO 0 02, 1301 15 16. 17 1 18 19 A 20 21 22 69 7 8th. Pi R60 1956 02- 04- 01 00 05 700 238th. ST SW -T 7- 3! 8 00 9 17 R 5� 4 0/ 00 — 05 JO- L Oil 0/ 2 /0 16 7 7 8' -7102 0014; 6 5 - 4' a) 15 co 6 01// 3 5 021,2:1 D 01\ 02 0/ 2 U2 c\1 ;G/- A 7 / D12 C/ jj7)-- F 01. k 18 JQ) tzoA 16 of i:, 171 0311902 20 2 0, 01. 6 7 8 15 Ccm' 0 K 14 T 7 0 14.0 00 04 0 07 0+11 0 D mct"01CA ! / Cc) (JK. —Z-40 01— -ST-5—W.— wi LM I -T Ob bot, tr0b, 06 01 1 04 L,14 4i' N�: "-tO ;'A Snohomish County Community Development Crcff_4 R. Ladiser, Director 4th Floor, Administration Bldg. Everett, Washington 98201 Willis D. Tucker, County Executive October 18, 1991 Richard Embry, Project Manager Gramor Development, Inc. 4211 - 200th Street S.W., "#202 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 RE: AURORA MARKETPLACE Commercial Building Permits: 51753-51759 Commercial Building Permit Application: C8910481 ccount--Nux er: -004;;0-lM _45 W Dear Richard: Regarding your question during oui meeting yesterday about zoning of the Aurora Marketplace project site, please see the enclosed c6py of a zoning map for the subject property. A change in zoning is indicated by the black dashed lines. The long -short dashed line indicates a city limit boundary. Note that the entire site is zoned GC -General Commercial, with MR -Multiple Residential zoning to the west. The building permits, as issued, indicate our approval for zoning code compliance (Snohomish County Code - Title 18). I hope this information is helpful. questions, please call. S incerely, A17-n gldtlnly_)5� Ron Alldredge Site Review Supervisor RA/se Should you have any further' cc: Tracy Justice, Snohomish County Inspection Department (206) 388-3311 Toll Free: 1-800-562-4367 An Equal Opporturdty Employer 44 (46 9) Noov �Jlln, FRUITLA TO LAKE 256 h. 9T S.W 238th. ST SW 116) Snohomish County Community Development Ernie Berg, Manager 4th Floor. Administration Bldg, Everett.'Washington 98201 Willis D. Tucker. County Executive SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR COWERCIAL PERKT #51753,51754, 51755, 51756, 51757, 51758 & 51759 COMMNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1) C 8910481 2).Prior to any issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall: a) Complete all arking areas and site landscaping per approved plans (sheets A-2.1 and L_15 b).Submit for approval a Bond or Assignment of Funds for landscape maintenance (total shall be 110% of est. landscape and irrigation costs and shall run for period of 2 years from date of approval). I 3) Project/Business Identification and advert is ing/di splay signs shall require separate permits and shaljC�eTsubjejg.4. the signage allotment approved 10-10-90 a FTRF. -RF.VTF.W- n-r.-r)- ities 040. 2) 3) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE: I Prior to building o._,cupancy, a drainage inspection approval -will be required. 2) 3) 4) i TRAFFIC: Road improvements along the subject property frontage shall be. completed prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits- and in compliance with WSDO`T Developer Agreement regarding the subject property. 2) Improvements at the intersection of 236th St SW and SR99 as approved by DPW and WSDO`T shall be completed prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits, and in compliance with WSDOT Developer Agreement regarding the subject property. (206) 259-9311 Toll Free: 1-800-562-4367 An Equal Opportunity Employer SNOHOMISH COUNTY Commercial Contact PerSion Form C,9 10 3 0 8,1' YOUR PROJECT FILE NUMBER IS CONTACT PERSON: FIRM: ADDRESS: I - zevt: !ED. L4J. -tL- -,7 C) CITY: STATE: L.J ( &-iONE NUMBER: -7-74 - on98 SIGNED: ZIP CODE: '1930-3& DATED: Should you have any questions regarding your project or should you wish to check on the status) You can contact us at 259-9390 between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm Monday through Friday. Please have your commercial project number available. 60 PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE REVIEW FORK 1 DATE 2. S T R 0 A- 3. DEVELOPER NAME t>r--Ve—��MM -1� L ADDRESS-4 i Zov -s" V, A:r- 7-0 z TELEPHONE -7-74 5 4. REPRESENTATIVE NAME ff?g�j ADDRESS TELEPHONE I 5. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT AAJ F-tS) VI& MA, I — C— L—EA6-w U 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT SIZE Ll 11,5 7. LOCATION OF SITE tL t;, S 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA 9. DEVELOPMENT'S ROAD SYSTEM (TSA) 10. BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ANY EXISTING INFORMATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMA71ON PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER: I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED (THE DEVELOPER MAY CHOOSE TO PERFORM A TRAFFIC STUDY HOWEVER TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT PLACE THREE OR MORE PEAK HOUR TRIPS THROUGH A SPECIFIC LOCATION) I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED (SEE TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST C-4200-2 FOR SPECIFICS) E I COMMENTS: A REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CAN BE: PROCESSED (SEE REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST C-4200-5 FOR SPECIFICS) T ,�L 0 cc" j PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991 PAGE 1 OF 2 Checklist C-4200-1 11. BASEC- ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT AT THE PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOLLOW- INIT TRAFFIC IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND WILL REQUIRE IMPACT MITIGATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO DE- TERMINE IMPACT MITGATION REQUIREMENTS, IT WILL BE INDICATED BELOW. FUTURE CAPACITY: 12. OTHER PERTINENT DATA DISCUSSED: V, kh f7eQ, (TO BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL) 13. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW FEE: $ �j SNOHOMISH DATE FOR DEVELOPER DATE PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991 PAGE 2 OF 2 Checktist C-4200-1 0 0 A L) U, A, =C*M>-FA- CIF- oc>c;> y Usc- -4 S- A-) /I boa) ZL 'T 7-7 ra 99 jos-O:E� -11 u4--1 I PRESUBMITTAL CONtERENCE REVIEW FORM I DATE 2. fc; ->I T R 3. DEVELOPER NAME ADDRESS I k zx9v TELEPHONE -T74 '0041 S 4. REPRESENTATIVE NAME L e_Lx&F-1C> e-" (Sj�-�v ADDRESS TELEPHONE 5. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT ArQ F4> V,& L-A-C-F— N�-� C- L-Soa-" U 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT C-e" t-le-mcl 6.L- SIZE 7. LOCATION OF SITE 3-2- E-t> Pn tL r-�, r.-, 9b I B. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA LIJ 9. DEVELOPMENT'S ROAD SYSTEM (TSA) 10. BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ANY EXISTING INFORMATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATIONPROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER: COMMENTS: A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED (THE DEVELOPER MAY CHOOSE TO PERFORM A TRAFFIC STUDY HOWEVER TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT PLACE THREE OR MORE PEAK HOUR. TRIPS THROUGH A SPECIFIC LOCATION) A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED (SEE TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST-C-4200-2 FOR SPECIFICS) A REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY MUST BE -COMPLETED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED (SEE REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST C-4200-5 FOR SPECIFICS) ()CUA L oA,vk-�,�j 1z k4,v-o r-c�- �C,o-ce-- , PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991. PAGE 1 OF 2 Checklist C-4200-1 BASED -ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE,APPLICANT AT THE PRESUB'MiTTAL CONFERENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOLLOW - _,I NG '; RAFFIC IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND WILL REQUIRE IMPACT MITIGATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO DE- TERMINE -IMPACT MITGATION REQUIREMENTS, IT WILL BE INDICATED BELOW. FUTURE CAPACITY LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: INADEQUATE ROAD CONDITION: FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1;. OTHER PERTINENT DATA D ISCUSSED a - 13. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW FEE: $ (TO BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL) FOR DEVELOPER SNOHOMISH COUNTY DATE DATE PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991 PAGE 2 OF 2 CheckList C-4200-1 SN.OHOMISH COUNTY Co.mmercial Contact Per%son Form YOUR PROJECT FILE NUMBER IS 10-3083 CONTACT PERSON: FIRM: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ('J ZIP CODE: ( &.,ONE NUMBER: -7-74 - noie SIGNED: z�"Z';� 5�- , DATED: Should you have any questions regarding your project or should you wish to check on the status, YOU can contact us at 259-9390 between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00prn Monday through Friday. Please have your commercial project number available. PRESUBMITTAL CONVERENCE REVItW FORM 1 . DATE 2. S T Z-7 R 3. DEVELOPER NAME .ADDRESS S4"01!= L'i TELEPHONE -- -7-74 -'oo-ie 4. REPRESENTATIVE NAME k e, 14pr- I> V--v ADDRESS TELEPHONE 5. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT SIZE 2,f 20 s 7. LOCATION.OF SITE k1a 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA Lo . :5"e>140 M I S, i4 C-.4>L-) t..A 9. DEVELOPMENT'S ROAD SYSTEM (TSA) 10. BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ANY EXISTING INFORMATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER: I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED (THE DEVELOPER MAY CHOOSE TO PERFORM A TRAFFIC STUDY.HOWEVER TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT PLACE THREE OR MORE PEAK HOUR TRIPS THROUGH A SPECIFIC LOCATION) I I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED. . . (SEE TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST C-4200�2 FOR SPECIFICS) COMMENTS. I A REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED . (SEE REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST-C-4200-5 FOR SPECIFICS) aAAW,ous L", L, v A, . %-j cAdm t\o VC C,CAJ� ?hko, "tt m V twvL,�4 to,, cl� -k4 PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991 PAGE 1 OF 2 Checklist C-4200-1 BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT AT THE PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOLLOW- ING TRAFFIC IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND -WILL REQUIRE IMPACT MITIGATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO DE- TERMINE IMPACT.MITGATION REQUIREMENTS, IT WILL BE INDICATED BELOW. FUTURE CAPACITY: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: INADEQUATE ROAD CONDITION: 1,13 FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY: 12. OTHER PERTINENT DATA DISCUSSED: "ve-wo."al Vvp ry oe ,-,,.vl 13. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW FEE: $ (TO BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL) 21-v 9 SNOHOMISH COUNTY DATE FOR DEVELOPER _�ATE PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991 PAGE 2 OF 2 Checktist C-6200-1 0 A� 0 0 0 *_0 �-3 En WILLIS D. TUCKER County Executive, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 41h - Floor, Cou�ty Administration Building Everett. Washington 98201 259-9388 or 259-9311 Toll Free: 1-800-562-4367 Scan Prefix: 549 P ROJECT NAM.6 ADDRESS PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT!' All construction is subject to field inspections', corrections and final field approval. The issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy prior to' the-buil ding being occupied. No concrete shall be poured without inspections. Notify the Division of Inspection Compliance at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance. An approved set of plans shall be kept at -the job site at all times during Con- struction. A separate permit shall be requir ed for mechanical heating and venting systems. A separate permit shall be required for plumbing*work. N/ To obtain electrical permit and' -inspection con.tact the State Departinent of Labor & Industries', Electrical Division iat (2o6) ZS-4-2,1332_ 4 Use of Constructi*on Type: VA) 54- basemenz rirsL jecona story Third Story Area: cc. G r 0 . L oad. Area: Occ. Group: Occ. Load: Area: OCC oup: Occc.*Loadp:- Area: Oc'c. Grou p� 0 cx_-_�o a d I f we can be, of any f urther ass i stance to you, please feel f ree to contact US. Date: Plan Check # —C Li Code Compliance Inspector DIVISION OF TECHNICAL REVIEW DIVISION OF INSPECTION & COMPLIANCE 366-33-903 a.m. 5 p.m. ac?8-32TH 8`a.m. - 9 a.m. DIVISION OF DIVISION OF DIVISION OF INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICAL REVIEW INSPECTION & COMPLIANCE -A lc4e, i 11 -0 va u, o, P: r,- Fcft�.TA- C.. - I F- --r- M, e-ex,�Ts. 'r . .4 5 Jq (on —I I M A-TMI=� USC- --7 -7 8 -761 IkEuk.4j.& .-VED MAR 0 5 1991 PUCOUNTER COMMUNITY VIEVELOPMENTI PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE REVIEW FORK 2. /--S31 T R 1 . DATE 3. DEVELOPER NAME ADDRESS TELEPH ONE —7-74 4. REPRESENTATIVE NAME I e—u&r— I> ADDRESS TELEPHONE 5. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT SIZE 42400s- 7. LOCATION.OF SITE VX" C�4 C?'S. k.0 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA 35Nk>p'e> m I i 9. DEVELOPMENT'S ROAD SYSTEM (TSA) 10. BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ANY EXISTING INFORMATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THEDEVELOPER: 3 A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED (THE DEVELOPER 14AY CHOOSE TO PERFORM A TRAFFIC STUDY.HOWEVER TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT PLACE THREE OR MORE PEAK HOUR TRIPS THROUGH A SPECIFIC LOCATION) I I I COMMENTS: A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED (SEE TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST C-4200-2 FOR SPECIFICS) A REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED (SEE REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY CHECKLIST C-4200-5 FOR SPECIFICS) -T,t,4vL v �-j ej "� A\ dA ko Wtcurl,w ? LAL t . uttwil,14 PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991 PAGE 1 OF 2 Checktist C-4200-1 11. BASED ON INFORMAT16N PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT -AT THE'PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOLLOW- ING TRAFFIC IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND WILL REQUIRE IMPACT MITIGATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO DE- TERMINE IMPACT MITGATION REQUIREMENTS, IT WILL BE INDICATED BELOW. 12. OTHER PERTINENT DATA DISCUSSED: 13. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW FEE: S "ve"A&V rt 001y'-O (TO BE PAID AT TIME OF APPLICATION SUBMITTAL) SNOHOMISH COUNTY DATE FOR DEVELOPER 6ATE PUBLIC WORKS January 29, 1991 PAGE 2 OF 2 CheckList C-4200-1 F_ TEGRIS FIRE PROTECTION, INC. FIRL PROTECTION SYSTEMS 14415 Southeast 128th Street L RENTON, WASHINGTON 98056 (206) 255-6644 FAX (206) 228-2909 am� T 0 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached the following: 9 R� Shop Drawings E] Specif ications F1 Prints F1 Plans LETTM 01: TRANSMITTAL r-JOB NO. 7 17 _33 DATE Z ATTENTION RE: AWWU yz_,g,-T 10L.4ee, MWIN F-1 under separate cover via E] Copy of letter F] Change order F� Samples F1 r-COPJES DATE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 4 9D A-0 C' fk07, &VSV&,�Ad V2� f6V16ti) 2—C-4— P6cuz?o. lor-1 Ak&udyaw-rs -ro L671w- enr- Ocz:24, Fri I I I TH,ZTRANSMISSIONS ARE: For your approval r your use Asper your request For your review and comment(s) El FORBIDS DUE 19— Approved as submitted Approved as noted Corrections noted E] Resubmit with —_ copies for approval Submit copies for distribution Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US r- REMARKS: Excli, P-&�s r 5 IkOR-17EP 12-�v BA) 11/301 e4r, e2_e_111_0k 51 14a A got (J'a— e14 0 —Y /7 COPY TO: 16. SIGNATURE: Vo -7 1 1%6dlr"z� FORM 705-3 'MCJEE - 1055 EAST STATE ST. - ATHENS. OHIO 45701 To Reorder Call Toll -Free I-WO-526-1272 IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS DESCRIBED, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY LETT* OF TRANSMITTAL T91131RI9 F"IRE PROTECTION, INC. FIRL PROTECTION SYSTEMS 14415 Southeast 128th Street L RENTON, WASHINGTON 98056 1 (206) 255-6644 FAX (206) 228-2909 Z! 00 M.; T. NJ T 60*jfitL)A)jE\j 0 4*TbL Rmj& CDowni AOJIA)jjr?� 61-D6 C-VF'�M-rl 1 W4. Tezol W= Al2C QCtinimi-a vn" 1--� the following: ,Aftacle, F] under separate cover via — F� Shop Drawings Specifications E] copy of letter Ej Change order F1 Prints E] Plans [—] Samples El NO. -Z DATE LJOB T, A-TTENTION n4 74- VIZU6 1 POP,? UM gjw4y qj -Z-r egA_ :;r Stj .;g�Wkniisit C-7-Y. &JA,, .10 r`COPfS DATE � � I NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2+91 1 - I -z- 14 Y 14zo CA Gcs .)(e/2o-00 1-7 ZZ4) 3 0 V f - 1Hh5V_ THANSMISSIONS ARE: 6 For your approval _For your use Asper your request E] For your review and comment(s) [] FORBIDS DUE F] Approved as submitted Approved as noted Corrections noted Resubmit with __ copies for approval Submit copies for distribution F1 Return corrected prints 19 F] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: �C- I, T% V ]MLALL V DLY V'/ C4- P, 12 1991 - '_ 1991 UNT romMUNIITY DEVELOPM IT "U'x0o, SIGNATURE: FORM 705-3 MCBEE - 1055 EAST STATE ST. - ATHENS. OHIO 45701 To Reorder Call Toll -Free 1-800-526-1272 IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS DESCRIBED, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY SNOHOMI.SH. COUNTY Co--mmercial Contact Person Form YOUR PROJECT FILE NUMBER IS 59,04el CONTACT PERSON: Thomas K. (Tim) Hall FIRM: Commercial Design Architects, Inc. (CDA) ADDRESS: 4230 198th Street SW CITY: Lynnwood STATE: WA ZIP CODE: 98036 PHONE NUMBER: SIGNED: DATED: 12/28/89 Should you have any questions regarding your project or should you wish to check on the status, you can contact us at 259-9390 between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm Monday through Friday. Please have your commercial OA project number available. /n) .'It YKV J 1�4nv<t V COMMERCIAL P4ESIGN ARCHITECTS, INC. 4230 198th Street 8W LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 (206) 771-2300 TO �boj:jphjA (S4 Cott A21, P-4 Fb a YLTA Ek�_ 0 P_ AO" 1�[S-MAT(ok) VA9)Z-6 _7T_/ WA4 - -1 (T-2,0 I LIECIrcIrrE12 W, TMUSEUCTUL DATE Z JOB NO. ATTEN11ON RE - Au" L�" kh) i WE ARE SENDING YOU U:.6ttached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: • Shop drawings Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications • Copy of letter 0 Change order coh n-z�j A0z.1r'0';,J * (4'l;.1 ,,I, /?Z'L�k W,qA , P02-A4(_r APRir_,�772IAJ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION z 0/0- IPZ.,9-1,) 104f^/ ( lv� 16 .5�'Jl V ULU 2 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: X For approval For your use 0 As requested -Yf- For review and comment 0 FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS 0 Approved as submitted EJ Approved as noted 0 Returned for corrections 0— ,;e Resubmit --copies for approval 0 Submit —copies for distribution CJ Return —corrected prints 19 El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY SIGNED: I.. Gmft, U,. 014 11 PRODUC72402 LI= It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. A. MEROAL D D INC. �\R(NA--TS 4230 198th ST. S.W. LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 (206) 771-2300,1, FAX: (206) 672-4244 GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT Aurora Marketplace Tax Account No. 10/24/89 AMOUNT AMOUNT OWNER TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE TRACT NO. Dontos 4519-001-009-0005 1989 3,918.21 0.00 3,918.21 9 Marmsoler 4519-001-014-0503 1989 1,317.06 0.00 1,317.06 2 Chapman 1988 1,066.60 0.00 1,066.60 2 Dawson 4519-001-014-0404 1989 307.01 0.00 307.01 4 4519-001-013-0108 1989 943.98 0.00 943.98 4 4519-001-013-0109 1989 1,061.38 4 Storm 4519-001-007-0007 1989 1,500.22 0.00 10 4519-001-008-0006 1989 1,371.55 0.00 10 4519-001-016-0006 1989 2,771.44 0.00 10 4519-001-017-0104 1989 39.37 0.00 10 4519-001-017-0203 1989 857.47 0.00 10 4519-001-017-0401 1989 238.75 0.00 10 Martin 4519-001-005-0108 1989 1,341.48 0.00 12 4519-001-005-0207 1989 2,585.93 0.00 12 4519-001-018-0103 1989 275.23 0.00 12 Lee 4519-001-015-0106 1989 1,214.07 0.00 6 4519-001-015-0205 1989 827.15 0.00 6 Saadatmandi ,/4519-001-004-0109 1989 1,580.91 0.00 11 1988 1,341.28 0.00 4519-001-004-0208 1989 911.35 0.00 11 1988 907.92 0.00 4519-001-006-0008 1989 1,585.48 0.00 11 1988 1,279.16 0.00 .Hanby 4519-001-014-0305 1989 679.83 0.00 3 Earp 4519-001-017-0302 1989 2,093.92 0.00 5 SNOHOMISH COUNTY OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4th Floor —Snohomish County Administration Building Everett, Washington 98201 ADDRESS APPLICATION TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER ee SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE: PLAT NAME: — SHORT PLAT* AND/OR LOT# IF APPLICABLE: (If ,P,&r,,ty igv�1yeAja.Iots-tjtus, BLA or access is by private easement please attach vicinity map with parcel and��_—�hLhi?fff gd! ACCESS ROAD NUMBER OR NAME: NAME: ADDRESS TO VERIFY: PHONE NUMBER: e 0-do -,?/ - 3L3 J'\� ADDRESS ON EITHER SIDE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IF KNOWN OFFICE USE ONLY BELOW THIS LINE ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 2 � -3 W CS'4"h I () 49f PE AING W14N PER�MIT APPLICATION 0 YES PLAN CHECK NO. PENDING ACCESS PERMIT 0 YES CD-17 CDP 4-81/19 SNOHOMISH COUNTY Cornmercial Contact Person Form (Ile YOUR PROJECT FILE NUMBER IS CONTACT PERSON: FIRM: Commercial Design Architects, Inc. (C.D.A. Inc.) ADDRESS: 4230 198th Street SW CITY: Lynnwood STATE: WA ZIP CODE: 98036 PHONE NUMBER: 771-2300 SIGNED: DATED: 10-24-89 Should you have any questions regarding your project or should you wish to check on the status, you can contact us at 259-9390 between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm Monday through Friday. Please have your commercial project number available. JOB SHEET NO OF ENGEL INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS LIC. =ENGELI 169N3 CALCULATED BY OAT CHECKED BY DATE SCALE- om: Al,'ubj ect: Date: Attach: Certify: Forwarded by: 11 MZ"RWW- Frank Wyckoff@Com-Dev@Snoco Janet-Little@Com-Dev@SnoCo Tuesday, June 13, 1995 11:38:04 PDT N ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is to let you know that we have followed normal procedures to turn over files to the City of Edmonds. 1 8 9 0 - 19 9 - . May 16,1994 CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA'M. HALL 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works * Planning Parks and Recreation 9 Engineering EXECLITIVE OFFICE Dennis Derickson f 0 1995 Snohomish County Planning 3000 Rockefeller Everett, WA 98201 RE: Parking lot plans, building plans and building uses for commercial buildings in newly annexed areas Dear Mr. Derickson: With the completion of the Aurora Marketplace neighborhood annexation the City now is in the process of reviewing applications for tenant improvements to the commercial buildings. Unfortunately we have no information regarding the existing buildings, uses and parking. As new businesses apply for business licenses and tenant improvement permits, . we must determine if the particular uses meet the zoning code and the parking requirements. To do this we need to know what uses were previously located in the buildings, what square footage of the building any particular use occupied, and how many parking stalls were allocated to that use. Therefore, the City is requesting your assistance in obtaining the following information if it is - available: all.d6frimercial building plans—; com me'ribial parking 16-f YrO site plans; .. ind b6ildin� �se , �" .- . - �� _:i�. I � infoiffi"a'tioH�: ViF� opi� * '.1 i n'i " " i h this informat o s available as it W613'ld gir-6idt y assist the City to serve the n '"Iy annexed areas. If your office is not the correct office for this information, please forward ew this request to the proper agency, or notify me as to who to contact. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 771-0220. The requested information can be sent to the City of Edmonds Planning Division, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. Sincerely, Z., John Bissell Associate Planner tz� C. Mary Lou Block 1:\tcmp\jb\files\letters\snoco.doc 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 * Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan ..COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 17—cv I —ao—'l —c/1'06? EXPIRES — TAX ACCOUNT NO. OCCUPANT STREET NO. 11wv qq bCC. GROUP .2 OWNER USE ZONE ADDRESS _:V011 �7kf,' 4��.-2 41ww.1,94W TYPE OF BLDG. BUILDING PERMIT NO. :5-qf a 9.zgg�Fqz HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND THE FOLLOWING OCCUPANCY THEREOF IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED: FLOORS OCCUPANCIES AREA UNDER THIS CERTIF. SQUARE FT. MAXIMUM OCCUPANT LOAD MAX. ALLOWABLE FLOOR LOADS LOS. PER SO. FT. _T_ Z215,7 <2�<_ REMARKS CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR: DATE 16 BY: Building Official POSTING: The Certificate of Occupancy shall be posted in a conspicuous place on*the premises and shall not be removed except by the Building Official. CO-2 SrM TNSPE(�MON Ej OK El Bonded Improvements Bonded Drainage .... ......... e ep one.,: e FT OPERAIIONS- oK.' -Bonded E Un- 1 -=7. e, I i `e T n % e: 7FJ�M_ QDPW El OR 11 Bonded elepnone* a e ::i*,., 0' T TEMP D 30 Day 90 DaY 11120 Day FINAL 11 Y.S1 TEM 0 Ducr oijpi�-v-- w I" , - 1; OIL 6 P p 56 SUBJECTTO FIELD INSPECTIGNS, CGOR ffr-T-r* IS1014S nF PLAN CHMK 71 -7,4M EXAMINER, BUILDING DEPAR—fM—M'- SWHMM cnffNTY Aurora Marketplace EXHIBIT `A-2' LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Lots 4 through 18, block 1, plat of Fruitland Acres to Lake Ballinger, according to the plat recorded In volume 10 of plats, page 47, records of Snohomish County. Washington lying west of the westerly margin of Pacific Highway (Highway 99 North), north of the northerly margin of 238th Street S.W., south of the so6therly margin of 236th Street S.W. and east of the following described line: Beginning at the Intersection of the west line of the east 120.0 feel of lots 9, 10 and 11 of said block I of said plat with the south margin of 2361h Street S.W.; thence south along said west line to the south line of said lot 11; thance west along said south line a distance of 70.0 feet to intersect the west line of the east 190.0 feet of lots 12, 13 and 14 In said block I in said plat; thence south along said last named west line to the north margin of 2381h Street S.W. and the terminus Of said described line. SNOHOMISH CO.UNTY Commercial Contac.t Person Form 'd4-P YOUR PROJ CT FILE NUMBER IS .CONTACT*PERSON: FIRM: C9106264 ADDRESS q 2- T (A'�9 CITY: S ATE ZIP CODE: -PHONETUMBER: SIGNED: DATED: Should you have any questions regarding your project or should you wish to check on the status, you can contact us at 388-3390 -between the hours of 8:00am ind 5:00�ni Monday through Friday. Please have your comercial project nunber available. 0 0 June 28, 1991 Snohomish County Community Development 4th Floor, Administration Building Everett, Wa 98201 Attn: Vi'cki Nulle GRAWHIC -1 Re: DryClean U.S.A. sign permit. X Dear Vicki, DISPLAY SIGN COMPANY Thank you so much for allowing me to send in this application rather than bringing it in. 14 505 N. E. 9 1 st Street Redmond, Washington 98052 206/441-2070 206/869-5273 FA)< 206/869-5439 I have corrected all that we had discussed (enclosed on drawings). The only problem I came across was with the scale on the site plan. The landlord did not have an original, and said that my copy had been reduced and enlarged many times. I have ordered an original copy, and sent someon : e down to measure the store frontage (also on drawings enclosed). I hope this is sufficient for applying. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (206) 441-2070. Once again, thank you for working with me on this, it has saved me a lot of time.- S i n c e r e 1 y , JUWXJ� Judi Martinez Office Manager JRM/im enclosures Mr. Donald Penn CHEC Medical, Inc. 2600 Michaelson Dr., #1130 Irvine, California 92715 Re: Aurora Marketplace - Tenant Signage Dear Don: We have been allotted by Snohomish County, the reviewing� governmental agency, a certain square footage of signage for the entire project. Your portion of the allotment is 84, which must be a consideration of your sign design in addition to the design parameters of Exhibit 'C' - Sign Criteria" in the Lease. We also remind you that according to "Section 11 - Signs of the Lease, Landlord is to review and approve the signage prior to sign construction and installation. I understand that occasionally Snohomish County requires the - sign permit submittal plan sets to be signed off by the Landlord. as approved before the sign permit application is accepted, so you can see it is extremely important for you to obtain Landlord's approval. We look forward to working with you, and if you have any questions, feel free to call. Sincerely, GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT N.W., INC. Anne Kleinheinz Marketing AK:kp enclosure A (CNRAHAM 4211 200TH ST. S.W./ SUITE 202 /LYNNWOOD, WA98036 (206)774-0098 FAX (206)672-0622 C'u-0 SAN DIEGO C-;,� SEATTLE / PORTLAND / LAS VEGAS June 20, 1991 Mr. Donald Penn CHEC Medical, Inc. 2600 Michaelson Dr., #1130 Irvine, California 92715 Re: Aurora Marketplace - Tenant Signage Dear Don: We have been allotted by Snohomish County, the reviewing governmental agency, a certain square footage of signage for the entire project. Your portion of the allotment is 84, which must be a consideration of your sign design in addition to the design parameters of Exhibit 'C' - Sign Criteria" in the Lease. We also remind you that according to "Section 11 - Sia ns of the Lease,, Landlord is -to review and approve the signage prior to sign construction and installation. I understand that occasionally Snohomish County r6quires the sign permit submittal plan sets to b * e signed off by the Landlord as approved before the sign permit application is accepted, so you can see it is extremely important for you to obtain Landlord's approval. We look forward to working with you, and if you have any questions, feel free to call. Sincerely, GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT N.W., INC. Anne Kleinheinz Marketing AlK*p enclosure A ttFRA,HAJ4 4211 200TH ST. S.W. /SUITE 202 /LYNNWOOD, WA96036 (206)774-0098 FAX (206)672-0622 SEATTLE / PORTLAND i LAS VEGAS SAN DIEGO L.- Sn e& V! ' � ; ' v: ' - C'ne:c SNOHOMISH �COUINTY Co*mmercial Contact Person Form CONTACT PERSON: YOUR PROJECT FILE NUM . BER IS 0106265_ . k ) AJ E- J— & FIRM: At,/4�7 L ai�� f AJ rS�X #4, -1,6 Alk L ADDRESS: 37A) aae- --AV-1 CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: qp.2 PHONE NUMBER: & -6 fl- 0 IF 1171 / SIGNED: DATED: elf - —P LW Should you have any questions regarding your' projector should you wish to check on the status, you can contact us at 388-3390 - between the hours of 8:00am and 5: OOpm Monday through Friday. Please have your commercial project number available., . / . ` J1J/V 19 91 0 0 SNOHOMISH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORICS PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE REVIEW FORM U9106265; THIS BOX FOR COUNTY USE ONLY NOTICE TO CDD COUNTER STAFF AND PERMIT APPLICANT: The following items are required with your permit application: [X] This form must be submitted with the application A traffic study must be submitted with the application A traffic study is not required A Development Application Review Fee must be paid $ A Development Application Review Fee is not r,oquired Route application to DPW for review Do not route application to DPW 199, 1 DATE 2. S T 3. DEVELOPER VIDVkAR 4. REPRESENTATIVE %P0LTUV1a S�- 5. NAME OF DEVELOPMENT. -I" M K4a-C42- - 6. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT SIZE �X()Cto (,0%,\.ATL&Cz 7. LOCATION OF SITE n 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA 9. DEVELOPMENT'S ROAD SYSTEM (TSA) 10. BASED ON THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ANY EXISTING INFORMATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER: X1 A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED— T4- (The developer may choose to perform a traffic study, however,lto show that the proposed development does not place three or more peak hour trips through a specific location) I A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED (See Traffic Study Checklist C-4200-2 for specifics) I A REGIONAL TRAFFIC STUDY MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED (S R I T ff' Study Checklist C-4200-5 for specifics) C— qj SNOHOMISH COUNTY DATE FOR DEVELOPER 45ATF REVISED MARCH 7, 1991 PAGE 1 OF 2 CHECKLIST C-4200-1 YELLOW COPY - APPLICANT PINK COPY - DPW FILE 11. BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT AT THE PRESUBMITTAL CONFERENCE FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOLLOWIkG TRAFFIC IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND WILL REQUIRE IMPACT MITIGATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, IT WILL BE INDICATED BELOW. 12. COMMENTS/OTHER PERTINENT DATA DISCUSSED: ra, SNOHOMISH COUNTY I d - Igwd /4'x /4f /L DATE FOR DEVELOPER DATE REVISED MARCH 7, 1991 PAGE 2 OF 2 CHECKLIST C-4200-1 YELLOW COPY - APPLICANT PINK COPY - DPW FILE 91 0 COMMERCIAL PERMIT CONDITION PAGE COMMERCIAL PERMIT NO. -1/yz TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 4519-001-004-0109 APPLICANT: BRADLEY-SISK ENTERPRISES DBA TRAVEL AGENTS INTERNATIONAL SITE ADDRESS: 23632 HIGHWAY 99, EDMONDS, WA COMMERCIAL APPLICATION NO.: C9106265 CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY SITE: 1. BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION SIGN(S) SHALL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS AND BE SUBJECT TO SCC TITLE 18.44.040 AND THE APPROVED SIGNAGE ALLOTMENT FOR AURORA MARKETPLACE DATED 9-6-90. COMMENTS - CALL RON ALLDREDGE AT 388-3390. 0 C9106224 J U N 0 5 1991 PC/COUNTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT] March 15, 1991 Mr. Bill Gore Superc ' uts, Inc. 1080 Esplanade Place Walnut Creek, California 94596 Re: f I Aurora Marketplace - Ten -ant Signage, Dear Bill: We have been allotted by Snohomish County, the reviewing governmental agency, a certain square footage of signage for the entire project. �Your portion of the allotment is 40 s.f., which must be a consideration of your sign design in addition to the design - parameters of Exhibit V - Sign Criteria" in the Lease. 43 , I We also remind you that according to "Section 11 - LaW of the Lea, e Land ord is to review and approve the signage prior to sign construction and installation. I understand that occasionally Snohomish County requires the sign permit submittal plan sets to be signed off by the Landlord as approved before the sign permit application is accepted, so you can see it is extremely important for you to obtain Landlord's approval. We look forward to working with you, and if you have any questions, feel free to call. Sincerely, GRAMOR DEVELOPMEN-r N.W., INC. Richard Embry, Project Manager RE:kp enclosure tigRA HA W, 421 1 200TH ST.S W / SUITE 202 LYNN1-,'0,X'.WA98C3C- 1(20e.)774-0098 FAX(206)(572-062,' F ')F;-. L 4%. LA�, VfCL5 K SAN DIEGO ,0(5( ", - * I LLI LS WIN Od -iG; '6 L 3s -Ica. C.X-ICC-L -Sol -Gas--' ca vVA vis". I wo I