Loading...
23709 84TH AVE W.PDF111111111111 7803 23709 84TH AVE W 0 0 ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: 0,6- /P I DETERMINATION: 0 Conditional Waiver 0 Study Required /O(Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER.): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE SHORT PLAT I'll SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMITiSl #- GEOTECH REPORT DATE] STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: 0, LID #: LOT: BLOCK: LATEMP\DSrs\Forms\Street File Checklistdoc ca PLANNING DATA New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects STREETFILE Name: Paf A-YcM-ce Date: C) 1; 0 - �_DC) (.p Site Address: TH Plan Check #: BLD-2006- 5 f 2- 1 5:t-'3 1+ Project Description: 2- VItW t-yiP1t-X,-,5 Use(s) Proposed: ftl IA I a Yn f i Li Allowed Use: (US NO) CUP File Number: — To Allow What Uses: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / @� Reduced Site Plan Provided: ( OES NO) Zoning: F-M 1.6' Map Page: 0 0 Comp Plan Designation: HWI 99 (,Oy-rf"r Corner Lot: (YES 1 6 Flag Lot: (YES / @) AD13 File Number (date waived): 0 E; - I C) C) Lot Area: 9 2-5 Plans Match ADB Approved: (69 NO) Shoreline Required: (YES Critical Areas Determination #: El Study Required N Waiver SEPA Determination: QN5 165L44�,CG El Exempt 10 12-1 1 2- 0 0 5' El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form). Re Setbacks Street- Side: ID Side: r* Rea 19, Actual Setbacks Street: W Side: 10 Sid Rgr: Lot Coverage/FAR Required: 4 E5 Lot Coverage/f;AR Provided: Lot Coverage/F*R Calculations: BIC18 1,= 11 1P 131.01, 2_' 19 11 IP > P PqM6�9 Height Datum Point: Datum Elevation: 4-4-q - (Dt Maximum Height; 3 01 (25 Actual Height: .301 Subdivision: piat OF fYL4A+16LV1d +(,Vee1'­ Lot Aggregation Required: N 0 Landscaping Landscaping Matches ADB Approved: Landscaping Bid Provided: ( OES NO) * &Ooo W W-) Bond Amount (100% Bid): � inhpa-wfe� I n �pe ON fee, ( 11- bi'd Ian Review BY: �O� 6,70� ( V1. 6 wa) PLANNING DATA New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects =FILE I Commercial Parking Anatysis Business Name Type/Use Parking Ratio Tenant Area Required Parking Total Parking Required. - Total Parking Provided. - Multi -Family Parking Ana Is # Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit Parking Ratio # Units Required Parking Studio 1.2/D.U. 1 Bedroom 1.5/D.U. 2 Bedrooms 1.8/D.U. 3 + Bedrooms 2.0/D.U. Total Parking Requireaf.- (10 Total Parking Pro videcf. Other , : FJCA��, J, & -L - (�UPCY flatt) I i ?NTA-A rA d­c VM4�) V "PiA+ A-vaiw w0l Nmdse. $67000 -(4r%dSCq $3P#t?V# — frrJ*5A* Vb kndsc-alp + "V M 4LX 5V MOO (9 ri -6( r1l ) I/ Plan Review By: ge;w 6,70� #P20 '4C. 1%91-1 City at Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 Ile Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. Ile purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: -- City Receipt #: q__L,01 Critical Areas File#: ()y sqj2l Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant:_. A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a deten-nination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. in addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. 'Me undersigned applicant and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consider-ation on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infi-action based in whole or part upon false, niisleadmig, maccurate or mcomplete infortnation furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to fil this application gMe behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE oF APPLicANT/AGENT77 DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I cerfify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER Owner/Appficant: Name - Street Address city 'State Zip Telephone: 0 - a20 — 1 (3 ( 0 Email address (optional): DATE Applicant Representative: VA 'I & 7 Z006 Name BUiLUAU, Street Address city State Zip Telephone: �� (0 - a-�� - L-+� 3 - Email Address (optional): EM #P20 CA File No: 05— to Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrolo, /vegetation) S1 L Site Address/ Location: NAki, —0 2. Property Tax Account Number:_ 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): -a, 4. - Is this site currently developed? -k yes; _ F1161 If yes; how is site developed? I Ll.�' I I. VAKW j - 1 5. Describe the general site topography. Check Jthat apply. �4 Flat less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertii distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): L ",' 0) 0 4"" 4vc W Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: 14. Approx. D _V­ What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway KI K floodplain of a water course. 9. Site corjt�ains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow ;shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: 0 ( IN ­ - -- J For City Staff Use Only 1 Plan Check Number, if applicable? NOOK, iliVM- 2. Site is Zoned? EM- I-E57. 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? 5-- A- I 6(e/yy" 0 6( U Y10 4111 WAM CA CO 0!�V I 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? N00f, 6h0WV1 - Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?- L4A* J &4*rl -C4 'a +D M CA Vt, -fi 0 a I d V1 a -H 0-)K1 IRJCVV;1035101�� —STUDY REQUIRED Reviewed - � X WAIVER K:3 Permit ID: 110722 L-E] Planning Permits Old Tax Acct #: 14519-001-012-02 L.L] New Tax Acct #: 1004519�001-012-02 11 El T-T] New- Undo- GoTo.. Print. Exit.. Year: App #: Type: Contract Rezone? 12005 1100 JADB Applicant's Name: lArcher Group Building #: 123707 Street* 184th Suffix JAV Dir: 1W Apt #: Intersection? Streets: Permit Information.. Show Process + Subdivision Details Description: 16 - unit Date Rec'd: FF9� Hearing Date: 111/2/2005 Final Hearing: Decision: FP Proved Date Decision Final: 111/4/2005 Total Process Time: Appeal Period Done: 111121/200 Review Hold Days: F- Expiration Date: F- Staff Member: 113ullock Extension? Project Name: Subdivision Data? FLURY-WYRICK AND ASSOCIATES,INC. November 30, 2009 Jeanie McConnell Engineering Program Manager ZD City of Edmonds 121 5"' Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: 84"" AVENUE WEST TOWNHOMES (SOROS) DRAINAGE REVISION Dear Jeanie: The-fedlowing information is provided in response to your staff letter dated November 24, 2009. The foll6wing information was requested by Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Program Manager: The proposed addition ol'90fieet of 21-inch diameter detentionpipe does providefin- additional volume to the detenlionsyslem. Hovvever, I cannot aprove the submittal based on that infiffmation alone. The applicant must demonstrate that the modified detention syslem ivill match the pre-development.flows contained in the City -approved 2006 drainage report.fbr the 2, 10 and 100-yearevents. Th is needs to be demonstrated by niode ling the developed scenario shoivn on the revisedplans. There are too many variables that contribute to the discharge rateftoin a detention system beside storage volume, such as elevations and diameters of the or�fices, elevation qf1he ove�flovvpipe, and slope qfthe oiql�illpipe, to approve this solely based on storage volume. In response to Mr. Shuster's comments we offer the following calculations which are consistent with the proposed revision and demonstrate that the design storms are mitigated as required by the Edmonds Municipal Code. Existing Event Summary: BasinlD Peak Q Peak T Peak Vol Area Method Raintype Event ------- (cfs) (hrs) (ac-ft) ac /Loss Existing 0.00 9.00 0.0056 0.21 SBLJH/SCS'ryPEIA 2 yr Existing 0.01 8.50 0.0107 0.21 SBUH/SCSTYPEIA 10 yr Existing 0.04 8.17 0.0232 0.21 SBUH/SCSTYPEIA 100 yr F-FRING 1409 NI (AM 11(; \ 1A. \ V UIN I' F S U ITI 1: Y 1% It FT I , WA 9 8 2 0 1 K= r__-i November 30, 2009 Page 2 Drainage Area: Existing I lyd Method: SBUl-1 Hyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm DUr: 24.00 hrs Area Pervious 0.2120 ac Impervious 0.0000 ac Total 0.2120 ac Supporting Data: Pervious CN Data: Forested Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Fixed None Entered Developed Event Summary: BasinlD Peak Q ------- (cfs) Developed 0.05 Developed 0.07 Developed 0.12 Drainage Area: Developed Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd Peak Factor: 484.00 Storm Dur: 24.00 lirs Area Pervious 0.0560 ac Impervious 0. 1570 ac Total 0.2130 ac Supporting Data: Pervious CN Data: Landscaping Impervious CN Data: Impervious Pervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Fixed None Entered Impervious TC Data: Flow type: Description: Fixed None Entered CN 81.00 0.00 81.00 Peak T (hrs) 8.00 8.00 8.00 CN 86.00 98.00 86.00 98.00 Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 111tv: 10.00 rnin TC 0.55 lirs 0.00111-S 0.2120 ac Length: Slope: 0.00 ft 0.00% Peak Vol Area (ac-ft) ac 0.0190 0.21 0.0272 0.21 0.0440 0.21 Coeff. Travel Time 32.7000 32.70 min Method Raintype Event /Loss SBUH/SCSTYPEIA 2 yr SBUH/SCSTYPEIA 10 yr SBUH/SCS TYPE I A 100 yr Loss Method: SCS CN Number SCS Abs: 0.20 1 11tv: 10.00 rn in TC 0. 17 lirs 0. 17 lirs 0.0560 ac 0. 1570 ac Length: Slope: Coeff- Travel Time 0.00 ft 0.00% 10-0000 10.00111111 Length: Slope: Coeff- Travel Time 0.00 ft 0.00% 10.0000 10.00 rn in 3 10 1) N1 (" 1) U A 1, 1, A N' 1: N U J; , S U I T H' I o 2 R I �T F, \X A 1) 8 2 0 1 November 30, 2009 Page 3 Control Structure ID: Combo - Combination Control Structure Descrip: Multiple Orifice Start El Max El Increment 446.6700 ft 449.5700 ft 0.10 ID List: D-00 I Riser Control Structure ID: D-001 - Multiple Orifice Structure Descrip: Multiple Orifice Start El Max El Increment 446.6700 ft 448.5700 ft 0.10 Orif Coeff. 0.62 Bottorn El: 444.67 ft Lowest Diarn: 0.6300 in out to 2nd: 1.5800 ft Diam: 1.0800 in Control Structure ID: Riser - Overflow riser Descrip: Multiple Orifice Start El Max El Increment 448.5700 ft 449.5700 ft 0.10 Riser Dia: 12.00 in Orif Coeff- 3.78 Weir Coeff- 9.74 Node ID: Detention Pipes Desc: Manhole structure Start El: 446.6700 ft Contrib Basin: Stage Input Volume 446.67 0.00 cf 0.00 cf 446.97 12.00 cf 12.00 cf 447.27 48.13 cf 48.13 cf 447.57 125.86 cf 125.86 cf 447.87 240.06 cf 240.06 cf 448.27 416.18 cr 416.18 cf 448.57 542.81 cf 542.81 cf Node ID: RLP Desc: Manhole structure Start El: 446.6700 ft Contrib Basin: Storage Id: Detention Pipes Max El: 448.5700 ft Contrib I lyd: Volume 0.0000 acft 0.0003 acft 0.00 11 acft 0.0029 acft 0.0055 acft 0.0096 acft 0.0125 acft Max El: Contrib Hyd: Discharge Id: 448.5700 ft Combo 3 4 0 1) %1(: 1) U (; A 1,1, A V F N U k , S [,,I TI � j o 2 VI � R ];'I T, A'A 9820 1 November 30, 2009 Page 4 RLPCOMPUTE [RLPI SUMMARY 2 yr Match Q: 0.0050 efs Peak Out Q: 0.0113 cfs - Peak Stg: 447.78 ft - Active Vol: 205.26 cf 10 yr Match Q: 0.0132 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.0132 cfs - Peak Stg: 448.17 ft - Active Vol: 373.08 cf 100 yr Match Q: 0.0382 cfs Peak Out Q: 0.0390 cfs - Peak Stg: 448.58 ff - Active Vol: 545.75 cf A summary of the pre -developed and post -developed mitigated flows is provided below: Return Period Pre -developed Flow (c fis) Post -developed Flow (cfs) 2 Yr 0.01 0.01 10 Yr 0.01 0.01 100 Yr 0.04 0.04 The flow rates are mitigated as required. Please see the attached stage -storage surninary. These calculations take into account the connector catch basin volurnes as well as the 48-inch diameter storm drain manhole volurne; therefore the overall length of the proposed additional 2 1-inch diameter pipe has been reduced to 60 LF. Three sets of revised plans are included with this submittal for Your review. Please call ine if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, FLURY-WYRICK AND A- ,�SOCIATES, INC. Mark Flury Principal 1409 AVENITF, SUITF 102 I ` V I � H I � '1­1', W, \ ') 8 2 () I A"*, .4%, Pipe #1 Pipe #2 Pipe #3 Pipe #4 SDMH CB's Invert= 446.67 447.11 447.07 447.49 446.67 Varies Length= 88 75 70 60 Slope= 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 Diameter= 1.75 t75 1.25 1.75 4 Elevation Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Inc Total Volume 446.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 446.77 0.55 1.26 1.80 446.87 3.04 2.51 5.56 44&97 8.23 3.77 12.00 447.07 16.57 &00 5.03 21.60 447.11 0.00 5.53 0.00 27.13 447.17 26.08 0.46 6.28 0.22 33.04 447.21 0.55 6.79 0.37 34.24 447.27 36.92 2.53 7.54 0.59 48.13 447.31 3.04 &04 0.73 51.28 447.37 49.35 6.79 8.80 0.95 68.94 447.41 &23 9.30 1,10 74.78 447.47 62.84 12.43 10.05 1.54 95.09 447.51 15.80 0.11 10.56 1.98 103.70 447.57 77.05 18.96 11.31 2.64 125.86 447.61 24.13 1,05 11.81 3.08 136.08 447.67 91.71 26.50 12.57 3.74 159.68 447.71 34.14 4.08 13.07 4.18 173.67 447.77 106.58 34.59 13.82 4�84 198.06 447.81 45.24 9.40 14.33 5.28 215.42 447.87 121.44 42.95 15.08 5.94 24&06 447.91 57.11 15.57 15.58 6.38 259.04 447.97 136.07 51.31 16.34 7.04 283-44 448,01 69.50 23.29 16.84 7.48 304.49 448.07 150.22 59.41 17,59 8.14 328,15 448.11 82.20 31.97 18.10 8.58 350.47 448.17 163.62 6&94 18.85 9.24 372.81 448.21 95.01 41.34 19.35 9.68 395.93 448.27 175.91 73.48 20.11 10.34 416.18 448.31 107.75 51.18 20.61 10.78 439.71 448.37 186.55 79.11 21.36 11.44 457.40 448.41 120.23 61.34 21.87 11.88 475.34 448.47 196.08 83.37 22.62 12.54 496.18 448.51 132.25 71.64 23.12 12.98 519.45 448.57 204.09 137.92 85.44 77.84 23.88 13.64 542.81 it? C. 1 S () 13 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH , EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwmci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning o Building - Engineering August 14, 2006 MEMO TO: Puget Sound Energy Verizon Northwest SNOCOM Police and Fire Dispatch SNOPAC Snohomish County E911 U.S. Post Office Snohomish County Assessor's Office Snohomish County Information Services Snohomish County P.U.D. Edmonds Fire Department Edmonds Police Department Edmonds Utility Billing Edmonds Public Works Edmonds Building/Street File Edmonds Address Files Lynnwood Disposal Comcast Cable GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Please be advised that 23707 841h Avenue W has been retired from the Edmonds address system. It has been replaced with 23709 and 23711 84th Avenue W, Edmonds, WA. Occupancy: Multi -Family Short Plat Fruitland Acres Tax ID Number: 00451900101202 Lots 12 (see attached) If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or Harrison(q)ci.edmonds.wa.us. Please contact me if you wish to be removed from this list. Respectfully, Marie Ifarrison Senior Permit Coordinator Edmonds Building Department T - T - - Highlancls� 23424 F 08 23507 23107 I I ; 8707 23502 23big 23506 23515 13523 qoI5 j i I - -1 1 8523 th S SW 5 516 1 ) 8817 23116 3 23 9013 �I 13 5,2 23520. 8,05 8.6,9 21114 2112 "0' 21 7 88051 86013 Park 8 as f0i a" 8505 8423 23522 23121 0 0 T T 18532 9114 902 c, 21101 9016 23616 23601 9108 4 136 IJ 236�1 23603 90 12 23622 2 605 9300 8504 23607 23622 23.;JI 9102 9016 2110. 2: 23626 23630(f 362 6 3629 23713 P 842S 2370 11121 :7 -- - 890V 8427 23 9 8723 231'19 5 8833 2 -.21 .429 2' 23 890 Ile 238TH ST SW 23805 Uj 23808 7 0 628 IL w X < > 9112 23 15 23815 23814 < 8912 23820 23a22 23809 8826 23820 ,3a22 23824 23a28 23823 23830 828 23815 �Ml 87211 23901VI rona: 23904 23904 2-igol 29 11721 23912 001 \ 1 23916 1 8629 F23926 —9 72� _M21-123926 23930 _tt_� ` - _ 240 1 H ST SW 9022 G4 [24002 -- 9014 87.] 8410 84�4 24020 9024 8704 13700 64 8 2 J4 9012 114 9026 Greenery �'O Condo 24026 �: 24027 7. 1 �2 w 9008 241 24109 910-9 24 24104 < 24105 �4108 24112 24111 24110 24111 8515 24115 124118 24116 4 24118 24117 24 Galleon Apartments 24125 8725 iL 118 24119 9125 8 23 24121 24126 !42ND St — w _ __ _ ___ IW4127 242ND ST SW 24206 3: 4207 21,11013: 11 87 8624 8614 02 - F� 24214 11 24215 242 & 2420 24216 24217 8622 24217 9006 8730 -- 6610 8704 24220 24221 24222 24223 187?0 .62 24229 SM6 24228 24227 24230 2423 0 - — _�8726 24303 24304 24305 8509 Caml 8615 8601 ny's 24314 24313 -- -k ---- 24316 24315 24316 8805 ----4 -R. L- 24315 - 2431ff7 8603 24320 8605 im to M in #a I jai to faw I Von loom loan M I Arb 24.�I 1 1 .25 fM IWAIM 244TH ST SW/W5TH ST NW Snohomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data MW Pagel o472 Sn o No m 111 s hOnfine Government information & Services County4* Washington * R E A I., - Property Information County Home Assessor Home Treasurer Home Information on which Department to contact Please view Disclaimer If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please Contact Us. Date/'rime:8/14/2006 2:09:34 PM Answers to Frequently Asked Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new window) Return to Property Information Entry page Parcel Number 00451900101202 Prev Parcel Reference 45190010120208 View Map of this parcel (opens as new window)jl General Information Taxpayer Name 11 Address (contact the Treasurer if you have questions) ARCHER G DENNIS 111887 NORTHSHORE RD --- BELLINGHAM, WA 98226 If the above mailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change, see the information on Name and zn Address Changes Owner Name 11 Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) ARCHER G DENNIS & CHARLOTTE A 111887 NORTHSHORE RD - - - BELLINGHAM, WA 98226 If the above name and address is incorrect due to a recent sale, please see the information on Name and Address Changes After a- Sale Street (Situs) Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) 23707 84TH AVE W - - - EDMONDS, WA 98026-8901 Parcel Legal Description FRUITLAND ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER BLK 00 1 D-02 - W 90FT LOT 12 ALSO E 8.47FT OF W 98.47FT OF N 30FT SD LOT Go to top of page 1'reastirer's Tax Information Taxes For answers to questions about 1'axes, please contact the Treasurer's office (opens as new window) 2006 Taxes for this parcel $3,598.93 (Taxes may include Surface Water Management and/or State Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges, if any, are not included.) To obtain a duplicate tax statement, either download our Tax Statement Request form or call 425-3 )88-3366 to request it by phone. Go to top of page Assessor's Property Data Characteristics and Value Data below are for 2006 tax year. Please contact the Treasurer's office for answers to questions about 'Faxes (opens as new window) For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes), please contact the Assessor's Office (opens as new window) Property Values do not reflect ac�justmcnts made due to an exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons http://web5.co.snohomish.wa.us/propsys/asr-tr-propinq/PrpinqO2-ParcelData.asp?PN=004... 8/14/2006 Snohomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data Am. N"allies exemption. Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill. Tax Year 2006 Market Land $201,200 Market Improvement $156,8001_ Pending Property Values Tax Year 2007 Market Land $201,200 Market Improvement $178,0001 Go to top of page Property Characteristics Tax Code Area (TCA) 00227 View Taxing Districts for this Parcel (opens as new window) U,eC,de Ill Single Family Residence -Detached SizeBasis ACRE Size 0.21 (Size may include undivided interest in common tracts and road parcels) Go to top of page Property Structures Type Yr.Built Structure Description Dwelfing 1925 1 1/2 Story w/Basement View Structure Data (opens as new window) Go to top of page Property Sales since 7/11/1999 Explanation of Sales Information (opens as new window) Page 2 of 2 Market Total $358,000 Market Total S379,2001 Sales data is based solely upon excise affidavits processed by the Assessor. Transfer Receipt Sales Excise Deed Grantor (Seller) Grantee (Buyer) Other Date Date Price Number Type Parcels 5/6/2005 5/11/2005 $425,000 195006 W ABDO ALEXANDER S ARCHER G DENNIS & CHARLOTTE No A 4/2/2003 4/3/2003 $310,000 563231 W ADAMS JAMES B ABDO ALEXANDER S No Go to top of page Property Maps Town sh ip/Range/Section/Quat-ter, links to maps Neighborhood 5604000 Explanation of Neighborhood Code (opens as new window) Township 27 Range 04 Section 31 Quarter SE Find parcel maps for this Township/Range/Section View Map of this parcel (opens as new window)l http://web5.co.snohomish.wa.uslpropsyslasr-tr-propinqlPrpinqO2-ParcelData.asp?PN=004... 8/14/2006 W. �1�1- We W(Lu 1* btl 6t tvuoot)� �PPUfLtC Aivt 5(AtA?t\"-s , (Koumos c,-7kt:i,;: okw 6(ftauE WoPe- ArZtk; K--�Jb tD XD ft Cl) A w It rW A WILL,� Ost� (� Athc4l(? 4t) is �jote� -------------- (u., te WtfH SeE AttwodiEt� K--� for-, 14mc., bom-wk S�s REStn', JUN -i SUiLDING C'P'Y, APMOVED By ENGINEERING nQ CZ3 December 2000 Figure 614-6. Shoulder Work with Minor Encroachment (TA-6) tclo� A or =10 Typical Application 6 OL Page 6H-17 Note: See Tables 6H-2 and 61-1-3 for the meaning of the symbols and/or letter codes used in this figure. Truck -Mounted Aftenuator (optional) — LU CLL luot 1�� LW?71 I /� L A � OO\ Sect. 6H.01 AOW AM% General Requirements for Traffic Control Devices 1. When safe conditions are possible, two-way traffic must be maintained. All necessary traffic control devices shall be in good condition and placed in proper locations at all times until final work is completed and approvcd by the City of Edmonds. 2. The ' us ' e of high-level warning signs is recommended on all streets and required on sight restrictive streets. Advanced "Construction Ahead" warning signs are required at the following speed conditions: under 25 mph — 500 lineal feet; over 25 mph — 1000 lineal feet. 3. The City of Edmonds Police, Fire and Public Works Departments shall be notified of street closure locations and tirne periods. Streets shall be reopened immediately upon completion of the work. 4. It is the duty of the contractor to notify all abutting property owners forty-eight hours prior to commencing any construction that may impede traffic flow or cause the temporary suspension of utility service. Affected public utility services shall be properly notified. 5. All flag persons must be certificd by the State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries. 6. Traffic control plans submitted shall utilize the syrnbols as outlined in Table 6H-2 of the M1JTCD. 7. Sign spacings shall coMplywith theMUTCD Table 6H-3. 8. The City of Edmonds will allow the contractors to ut'1'7 1 1 -c WSDOT Standard K-Plans that are appropriate for tile activity that tile COntTactor is undertaking. Street Closure! Requirements (Refer to Figure 6H-20) __ UjtW 00t f;t FJ:FQ�t?. Streets closed for work shall be Properly posted with "Street Closed" signs and barricades as required. Signage shall be provided at the nearest intersection to allow for adequate traffic detour. Advanced "Detour Ahead" signs sliall be provided 500 feet in advance of the detour route intersection. Directional "Detour" signs shall be provided at all turns throughout the detour route on streets. Local access shall be provided whenever conditions allow safe passage. Traffic Contirglon Low Volume Roads( kefer toFigure 6H-18) UjjU W or (�e Two-way traffic withoutfiag person on minor streets that access no more than thirty homes. S:T-NOR' I 1ANDO1 JTSA'raffic C0111TOf F-8 I. DOC Revised 09/16/04 r.j L-00 Special Warning Signs for Motorcycles (see attached detail) The Washington State Legislature has determined that special waming signs must be provided (RCW 47.36.200) at work zones in addition to standard warning signs, to warn motorcyclists at work zone locations that are potentially hazardous to motorcycles. The following roadway conditions require the placement of sign, W21-1701 "MOTORCYCLES UTSE EXTREME C U A )TION": Roadway conditions a Grooved pavement (generally during pavement planing removal) • Abrupt lane edges (during paving and pavement removal) • Steel plates (usually temporary utility work) • Gravel or earth (many operations on the roadway or off could leave this type of loose material on the roadway surface) Standard warning sigris must also be used to wani of the actual roadway condition. Some applicable standard warning signs may be: • W21 -801 "NBRUPTLANE EDGE" • W8-7 "LOOSE GRAVEL" • W8-2001 "GROOVED PAVEMENT" • W21-2 "FRESH OTL" • W8-8 "ROUGH ROAD" 0 W8_1 IIBUMPII Sign W21-1701 should be installed at, one -mile spacing, throughout the work zone where the condition(s) exist, as part of a sequence of other appropriate standard warning signs (above examples) alsoi, on one -mile spacing. Sign 21-1701 Is not required for short duration* (up to one hour) work zones, emergencies or incident response operations, This sign is not required for other operations that have no direct impact on the roadway condition, such as: • N/Towing • Shoulder work 0 Snow and ice removal 0 Debris rennoval Care must be exercised during all work zone operations to not inadvertently create one or more of the above roadway conditions that may be hazardous for motorcycles. Additional roadway cleanj-ng may 'be needed to remove gravel, earth or other debris that may have been stockpiled, spilled or tracked onto the roadway surface. * Assumes that flic short duration work zone does not leave the roadway surface in one of the four conditions listed above. S TNCiRl IAN D01.JTS\TrIfflc CGIM01 F R I DO( Rcvi,,cd 09/16/04 r-.m-j no W21-1701 5,03 '00�oor x J? //�/�MOTORtYCLESX \\�CAIUTION A NSIONS (MILLIMETERS) A I B F-C T D I E I IF G goo - 16 22 �l 25C t=25 56 1200 19 31 lr)o .1 100 1 38 75 DIMENSIONS (INCHES) A D c D E F G 36 5 f8 7�9 K - 3 1 2 1 A 48 3A — 1 1 �f4 6C 4 1 1 Q 3 COLORS LEO EN D—D LfA C K (NO N- RE F L) BA CI-l.G F 0 UN D-0 RA N G r' 0� 1�1(c- / T 51tF, 6Q60r Jr a4l) CmL wtomwqo OQ Gits .1 ,�)Fl-rc-otlw fites I M. -4 jr,/ 000 1�t A OOOCO :1kc R E % SW L,(� �all JUN 1 20,25 BUILDING DFL�,Ar�7: 7 CPY OF STREET FILE Lo I DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE ARCHER 6-PLEX 23707 84TH AVENUE WEST CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON JRR # 05-SID PREPARED FOR: RON JOHNSON, ARCHITECT PREPARED BY: JRR ENGINEERING, INC. 18609 76TH AVENUE WEST, SUITE B LYNNWOOD, WA 98037-4149 PH. (425) 697-6108 FAX (425) 697-4506 RESUB JUN 2C,06 BuitaiN� NOS.4' Of U WAN IE REI":T FILE This report has been prepared by JRR Engineering, Inc. (M) for Ron Johnson, Architect as support information for a double triplex (6-unit) residential development within the City of Edmonds. Any revisions to the proposed project may not use or depend upon this report without the written permission of JRR. City approval will require items which are generally as follows: I . Identify existing conditions and possible development impacts 2. Show compliance with City code requirements for drainage Calculations and design plans are based on good engineering practice, City of Edmonds code requirements, methods and procedures in the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (1992), and investigation of the existing system in theproject area. General Site Des cription/Condition The subject property (site) consists of a single lot totaling approximately 9,253 SF (.212 acres) and is located on the East side of 84th Ave. W. approximately 250 ft south of 236th St. SW Said property has a street address of 23707 84th Ave. W., and is within the City of Edmonds, Snohon-dsh County, Washington. A complete legal description is shown on sheet C- I of the plans. The site is bounded to the north by vacant land, west by public right-of-way, south and east by similar residential developments. Existing Drainag Existing drainage at and around this site consists of urban runoff. At this time there is no storm drainage system on the site to collect runoff. The existing building on the site utilizes splash blocks and no downstream drainage is currently impacted. No wetlands have been identified on or adjacent to the site. The project is outside the floodplain and contains no shorelands. A closed conveyance system is located to the north in 84th Ave. W. The site currently flows uncontrolled to the southwest. Proposed Drainage Developed runoff from the site will be routed southerly as it does in it's present condition. An increase in impervious area is proposed. Runoff from the new buildings and the paved access and parking areas will be collected via catch basins and conveyed via a 2 1 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) detention system terminating in a Type 2 catch basin which will contain an outlet control tee and a 12-inch CMP discharge to the existing CB in 84th E;a FW2 Development Impacts The parking configuration, landscaping and drainage improvements are proposed to provide access and parking for the proposed use and improve the collection of surface water runoff on the site. No significant erosion has been observed on -site and no significant erosion is anticipated on the subject property or adjacent properties, due to the proposed development. Post development peak flows are expected to have no significant impact on existing downstream conditions. It is also the case that: (1) Modification to the existing drainage system will not cause runoff to be diverted away from the adjacent downstream property. (2) The proposed improvements are not expected to aggravate an existing drainage problem or create a new drainage problem adjacent to downstream properties. (3) A single orifice control structure is proposed for treatment and for releasing runoff at pre - developed rates. (4) The proposed project conveyance system will contain and convey the 10 and 100-year design storms. (5) The Clearing Limits that are anticipated consist of and coincide with the property lines, which will be marked prior to construction to indicate and delineate proposed improvements. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Desig Silt fencing, construction entrance and typical cover techniques will be employed to minimize the potential for erosion and sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation control details have been provided in the construction drawing submittals. Off Site Analysis The site is generally at the same grade as the abutting properties, and is generally not affected by 11upstream off -site areas". Storm runoff generally is limited to that which is generated "on -site". Downstream conditions consist of a closed (pipe) drainage system draining along 84th. No significant erosion has been observed around the existing grading. No significant erosion is anticipated on the subject property due to the proposed development. Post development peak flows are expected to have no significant impact on existing downstream conditions. r.,;O Summary of Design Soils: Alderwood Series Hydrologic Group "C" Runoff Characteristics: Existing & Proposed C,,: 81 Second Growth Forest 86 Landscape (good condition) 98 Impervious surfaces Design Storms: 2-Year Design storm precipitation = 1.5 inches I O-Year Design storm precipitation = 2.0 inches 100-Year Design storm precipitation = 3.0 inches Pre -Development Condition: Site Area = 9,253 SF (0.212 ac) "Meadow/Second Growth Forest" Note: Edmonds Drainage Code specifies all predeveloped conditions as "meadow " or "second -growth forest" No N sub s values for meadow or second growth in DOE: Ns =. 24 per Don Fiene, 61.5106 2-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.00 efs 10-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.01 cfs I 00-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.04 cfs Post -Development Condition: Landscape Area = 2423 SF (0.056 ac.) Impervious Area = 6830 SF (0. 157 ac.) 2-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.06 efs- 10-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.08 efs 1 00-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0. 13 cfs Detention Required = 537 W Detention Provided = 545 ft! ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES Project Name: _71 No-: S_ I b Le vv, e Ir Ln .3 2-.,,7 2_1 Designed Checked Date Sheet -of S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR), DURATION (HOUR), PRECIP (INCHES) 2,24,1.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.5011 TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BAS IN NO. 1 .212,81,0,0,32.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .2 81.0 .0 .0 32.7 PF,AK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .00 8.50 241 ENTER [d: I [path] f ilename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ron2pr FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BAS IN NO. 2 .056,86,.157,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .1 86.0 .2 98.0 '10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .06 7.83 829 ENTER [d:l [path] filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ron2po FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10,24,2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .212,81,0,0,32.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) wd PEAK-Q(CFS) .01 PERVIOUS A CN .2 81.0 T-PEAK(HRS) 8.00 IMPERVIOUS A CN .0 .0 VOL (CU - FT) 463 TC(MINUTES) 32.7 ENTER [d: I [path] f ilename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ronlOpr FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BAS IN NO. 2 .056,86,.157,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .1 86.0 .2 98.0 10.0 PF,AK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .08 7.83 1183 ENTER [d:l [path] filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ronlOpo FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP E;;z VO3 SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100,24,3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .212,81,0,0,32.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .2 81.0 .0 .0 32.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .04 7.83 1004 ENTER [d:][pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ron100pr FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .056,86,.157,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .1 86.0 .2 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 1914 ENTER [d:][pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ron100po, FILE AlREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP Apo* 00% 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER -HEAD (f t) , RISER-DIAM (in) 2, 2.57, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 744 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) .0 DIA.= .00 INCHES "Q-ORF" IS CHANGED TO .011 CFS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MIN. ORIFICE OF 0.5" TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 1.3 DIA.= .98 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .04 .04 2.57 540 TEST HYD 1: .08 .01 .02 1.64 340 TEST HYD 2: .06 .00 .01 1.34 280 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: ron2po TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .00 7) NUMBER- OF -ORIFICES, RISER -HEAD (f t) , RISER-DIAM (in) 2, 2.57, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED) 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 744 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) .017 h fA I M, (D (2- t r-- (cf DIA.= .63 INCHES -<- - TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 2.05 DIA.= 1.08 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .04 .04 2.57 - 537 TEST HYD 1: .08 .01 .01 2.00 410 TEST HYD 2: .06 .00 .01 1.06 220 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) .00 .00 .26 .01 .51 .01 .77 .01 1.03 .01 1.28 .01 1.54 .01 1.80 .01 2.05 .02 2.06 .02 2.31 .03 2.57 .04 2.67 .35 2.77 .92 2.87 1.65 2.97 2.44 3.07 2.73 STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .0 .0 53.8 .0 107.7 .0 161.5 .0 215.3 .0 269.2 .0 323.0 .0 376.8 .0 429.4 .0 430.7 .0 484.5 S27 0 538.3 .0 559.3 .0 580.2 .0 601.2 .0 622.1 .0 643.0 .0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE OF FACILITY: VAULT 2) STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 2.57 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): 0 MINUTES/INCH P - PRINT IF/OF, Im 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(cfs): .04 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: ronlOpo TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: ron2po ronlOOpo R - REVISE, S - STOP e� 323 ZJ0 - 2- +70 2- z Y-;Zli TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .01 TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .00 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 2.57, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE ARCHER 6-PLEX 23707 84TH AVENUE WEST CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON JRR # 05-SID PREPARED FOR: RON JOHNSON, ARCHITECT PREPARED BY: JRR ENGINEERING, INC. 18609 76TH AVENUE WEST, SUITE B LYNNWOOD, WA 98037-4149 PH. (425) 697-5108 FAX (425) 697-4606 STREET FILE JUN o -006 B DINC Uft L CITY OF This report has been prepared by JRR Engineering, Inc. (JRR) for Ron Johnson, Architect as support information for a double triplex (6-unit) residential development within the City of Edmonds. Any revisions to the proposed project may not use or depend upon this report without the written permission of JRR. City approval will require items which are generally as follows: 1. Identify existing conditions and possible development impacts 2. Show compliance with City code requirements for drainage Calculations and design plans are based on good engineering practice, City of Edmonds code requirements, methods and procedures in the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (1992), and investigation of the existing system in the project area. General Site Description/Condition The subject property (site) consists of a single lot totaling approximately 9,253 SF (.212 acres) and is located on the East side of 84th Ave. W. approximately 250 ft south of 236th St. SW Said property has a street address of 23707 84th Ave. W., and is within the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington. A complete legal description is shown on sheet C- I of the plans. The site is bounded to the north by vacant land, west by public right-of-way, south and east by similar residential developments. Existing Drainag Existing drainage at and around this site consists of urban runoff. At this time there is no storm drainage system on the site to collect runoff. The existing building on the site utilizes splash blocks and no downstream drainage is currently impacted. No wetlands have been identified on or adjacent to the site. The project is outside the floodplain and contains no shorelands. A closed conveyance system is located to the north in 84th Ave. W. The site currently flows uncontrolled to the southwest. Proposed Drainage Developed runoff from the site will be routed southerly as it does in it's present condition. An increase in impervious area is proposed. Runoff from the new buildings and the paved access and parking areas will be collected via catch basins and conveyed via a 21 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) detention system terminating in a Type 2 catch basin which will contain an outlet control tee and a 12-inch CMP discharge to the existing CB in 84th CA No Development Impacts The parking configuration, landscaping and drainage improvements are proposed to provide access and parking for the proposed use and improve the collection of surface water runoff on the site. No significant erosion has been observed on -site and no significant erosion is anticipated on the subject property or adjacent properties, due to the proposed development. Post development peak flows are expected to have no significant impact on existing downstream conditions. It is also the case that: (1) Modification to the existing drainage system will not cause runoff to be diverted away from the adjacent downstream property. (2) The proposed improvements are not expected to aggravate an existing drainage problem or create a new drainage problem adjacent to downstream properties. (3) A single orifice control structure is proposed for treatment and for releasing runoff at pre - developed rates. (4) The proposed project conveyance system will contain and convey the 10 and I 00-year design storms. (5) The Clearing Limits that are anticipated consist of and coincide with the property lines, which will be marked prior to construction to indicate and delineate proposed improvements. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Desig- Silt fencing, construction entrance and typical cover techniques will be employed to minimize the potential for erosion and sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation control details have been provided in the construction drawing submittals. Off Site Analysis The site is generally at the same grade as the abutting properties, and is generally not affected by 11upstrearn off -site areas". Storm runoff generally is limited to that which is generated "on, -site". Downstream conditions consist of a closed (pipe) drainage system draining along 84th. No significant erosion has been observed around the existing grading. No significant erosion is anticipated on the subject property due to the proposed development. Post development peak flows are expected to have no significant impact on existing downstream conditions. r4a No Summary of Desi2n Soils: Alderwood Series Hydrologic Group "C" Runoff Characteristics: Existing & Proposed C,,: 81 Second Growth Forest 86 Landscape (good condition) 98 Impervious surfaces Design Storms: 2-Year Design storm precipitation = 1.5 inches I O-Year Design storm precipitation = 2.0 inches I 00-Year Design storm precipitation = 3. 0 inches Pre -Development Condition: Site Area = 9,253 SF (0.212 ac) "Meadow/Second Growth Forest" Note: Edmonds Drainage Code specifies all predeveloped conditions as "meadow " or "second -growth forest" No N sub s valuesfor meadow or second growth in DOE: Ns =. 24 per Don Fiene, 615106 2-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.00 cfs I O-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0. 0 1 cfs 100-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.04 cfs Post -Development Condition: Landscape Area = 2423 SF (0.056 ac.) Impervious Area = 6830 SF (0. 157 ac.) 2-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.06 cfs 10-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0.08 cfs 1 00-Year Design storm peak runoff = 0. 13 cfs Detention Required = 537 W Detention Provided = 545 W cyjr-." jar! 22 4e Oexlxl'%,r, Ixl C. ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES Project Tf%^--k- Ok- ; No.: Q-5-- 5- 1 D Designed Checked Date- Sheet -of S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2,24,1.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .212,81,0,0,32.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .2 81.0 .0 .0 32.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .00 8.50 241 ENTER [d: I [path] f ilename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ron2pr FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .056,86,.157,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .1 86.0 .2 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .06 7.83 829 ENTER [d:1[path]filename[.ext1 FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ron2po FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP S.C,S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR), PRECIP (INCHES) 10,24,2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. .212,81,0,0,32.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .2 81.0 .0 .0 32.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .01 8.00 463 ENTER [d: I [path] f ilename [. ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ronl Opr FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A (PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN (IMPERV) , TC FOR BAS IN NO. 2 .056,86,.157,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .1 86.0 .2 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .08 7.83 1183 ENTER [d:l [path] filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ronlOpo FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP E� No SPECIFY. STORM OPTION: 1 � S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURAT ION (HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100,24,3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.0011 TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. .212,81,0,0,32.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .2 81.0 .0 .0 32.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .04 7.83 1004 ENTER [d:j[pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ron100pr FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .056,86,.157,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 .1 86.0 .2 98.0 10.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 1914 ENTER [d:)[pathlfilename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ronlOOpo FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP a 1. &N-2 7) !NTUMBER-OF-ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 2.57, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 744 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) .0 DIA.= .00 INCHES 'IQ-ORF" IS CHANGED TO .011 CFS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MIN. ORIFICE OF 0.511 TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 1.3 DIA.= .98 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .04 .04 2.57 540 TEST HYD 1: .08 .01 .02 1.64 340 TEST HYD 2: .06 .00 .01 1.34 280 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: ron2po TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .00 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 2.57, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 744 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) .017 S /-. DIA.= .63 INCHES -<-- - TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 2.05 DIA.= 1.08 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .04 .04 2.57 537 TEST HYD 1: .08 .01 .01 2.00 410 TEST HYD 2: .06 .00 .01 1.06 220 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP roo k ROUTING. DATA: STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) .00 .00 .26 .01 .51 .01 .77 .01 1.03 .01 1.28 .01 1.54 .01 1.80 .01 2.05 .02 2.06 .02 2.31 .03 2.57 .04 2.67 .35 2.77 .92 2,87 1.65 2.97 2.44 3.07 2.73 STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .0 .0 53.8 .0 107.7 .0 161.5 .0 215.3 .0 269.2 .0 323.0 .0 376.8 .0 429.4 .0 430.7 .0 484.5 S-27 0 538.3 .0 559.3 R.64"I' Z� .0 580.2 .0 601.2 .0 622.1 .0 643.0 .0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE OF FACILITY: VAULT 2) STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 2.57 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): .0 MINUTES/INCH P - PRINT IF/OF, 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(cfs): .04 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 TEST HYD I FILENAME: ronlOpo TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: ron2po mm ronlOOpo R REVISE, S - STOP 16P -7 Z - " "(# 7, 32,3 7 s-'M (17, -7 7 4-70( 1. -Z s- ( T, z Y-;Zli I+ to TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .01 TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .00 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 2.57, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): C;0 uEor'rECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561 July 24, 2006 84th Avenue Edmonds, LLC JN 05481 13215 — 8th Avenue Northwest Seattle, Washi higton 98177 Attention- Pat Archer Subject: Review of Plans Proposed Two Townhomes Buildings 23707 — 84th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Reference: "Geotechnical Engineering Study — Proposed Two Townhome Buildings", Geotech Consultants, Inc., December 22, 2005. Dear Mr. Archer: We previously prepared a Geotechnical Engineering Study for the above referenced project, dated December 22, 2005. As requested, we have completed a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the plans for the two townhome buildings to be constructed in Edmonds. The plans we reviewed included a partial copy of the architectural and structural plans (Sheets 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 10a, and 17). Ronald D. Johnson (Architect) prepared these plans, which are dated November 2005. Sheet 1 shows that an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) was used in the design of the townhome foundations. In our study, we recommended an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Thus, it is our opinion that the lower bearing capacity is acceptable, provided the footings still bear on the dense glacial till. We were only given the elevation views for Building 1 (Sheets 5 and 6). Based on discussions with Ryan Berry of Ronald D. Johnson (Architect), we understand that the proposed garage stab elevation for both buildings will be at elevation 448 feet- It appears that the necessary excavation for both buildings can be made safely within property limits. In our judgment, the plans that we reviewed conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical engineering report. Per conversations with you, we will be retained to perform geotechnical observation arid testing services on this project as directed by the City of Edmonds. We acknowledge appointment as Special Inspector for this project, and by copy of this letter, request that we be kept informed of the progress of construction so we are able to make the necessary observations, as required by City of Edmonds, in a timely manner. RESUB JUL 27 2006 BUILDING DEPAWMENT 01-N OF EDMONDS STREET FILE 84th and Edmonds, LLC JN 05481 July 24, 2006 Page 2 We trust that this letter meets your immediate needs for the proposed development. Please contact us if we can be of further service. cc: Ronald D. Johnson (Architect) GDB/MRM: jybi Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Gerry D. Bautista, Jr. Geotechnical Engineer L. IM C WA tp C40 0 IST NA YZ C-XPIRES Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal 4 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC, r1la I GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 84th Avenue Edmonds, LLC 13215 — 8th Avenue Northwest Seattle, Washington 98177 Attention: Pat Archer Subject: Transmittal Letter — Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Two Townhome Buildings 23707 — 84th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Archer: 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561 December 22, 2005 JN 05481 We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the property at 23707 — 84th Avenue West in Edmonds. The scope of our services consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-6928, dated December 8, 2005. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or for further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. GDB/MRM: esn Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Gerry D. Bautista, Jr. Geotechnical Engineer RECEIVED FEB — 7?nPI BUILDING DEPT W- & 0%.rR _0 FILE ti i E GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Two Townhome Buildings 23707 — 84th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the property at 23707 — 84th Avenue West in Edmonds. We were provided with a site plan showing the location of the existing residence and garage, and the proposed buildings. Ronald D. Johnson (Architect) prepared this plan, which is dated July 20, 2005. Based on this plan and conversations with Mr. Pat Archer, we understand that the existing .residence and garage will be demolished and be replaced by two, 3-unit townhouse buildings. This is similar to the recent development of the adjacent two southern parcels. Each building will have an approximate footprint of 28 feet by 58 feet, and each townhouse unit will consist of two stories over an on -grade garage. The garage slab for each building will have a proposed elevation of 448 feet. The two buildings will be set back 10 feet from their nearest adjacent northern or southern property lines. Minimal excavation is anticipated to reach the planned excavation bottom for both buildings. A new driveway will enter the property from the center of the western property line and terminate near the east property line. A short retaining wall will be constructed at the driveway's eastern terminus. If the scope of the project changes from what we have described above, we should be provided with revised plans in order to determine if modifications to the recommendations and conclusions of this report are warranted. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site in Edmonds. The irregular - shaped, level property occupies approximately 100 feet of frontage along the eastern side of 84th Avenue West and is approximately 100 feet in depth at the northern property line, and 90 feet at the southern property line. A two-story, single-family residence (#23707) is situated at the center of the property. The residence contains a basement with an approximate floor elevation of 446 feet. We observed some vertical foundation cracking on the foundation of the residence. A detached garage is located at the northeast corner of the property. This garage has an approximate slab elevation of 450 feet. A concrete driveway enters the property from its northwest corner and serves the garage. This driveway is heavily cracked and shows signs of past settlement. The front and rear yards of the residence are covered with grass and some sporadic small trees and shrubs. A three-story townhouse building complex borders the property to the south. The northern building is set back approximately 10 feet from the southern property line of the subject property at its closest point, and has an approximate garage elevation of 447 feet, which is roughly the elevation of the adjacent street. As described above, we understand that the proposed townhomes will have a layout and configuration similar to this adjacent property. A fenced vacant lot covered with tall grass and sporadic trees borders the property to the north, and a greenbelt/easement borders the property to the east. We previously performed a Geotechnical Engineering Study of the adjacent northern and eastern properties in 2001. Two GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. :0 oft 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL�_ December 22, 2005 JN 05481 Page 2 single-family residences were previously situated on the adjacent northern property but have since been destroyed and removed. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating four test pits at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The test pits were excavated on December 16, 2005 with a mini-trackhoe. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soil were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 3 and 4. Soil Conditions The test pits generally encountered approximately 1.5 to 2 feet of topsoil directly underlying the surface, except for Test Pit 4 (excavated in front of the garage), which encountered approximately 6 inches of silty sand fill overlying this topsoil. Native, loose to medium - dense, silty sand was encountered below the topsoil. At a depth of 3 to 4 feet, the silty sand became very dense. The dense to very dense, native soils have been glacially compressed, and are locally referred to as glacial till. These soils were exposed to the maximum explored depth of the test pits. The test pits were excavated to depths of 4.5 to 5.5 feet below existing grade, until the native soils were difficult to excavate using the mini- trackhoe, or the mini-trackhoe encountered refusal conditions. No caving was observed in the test pits. As mentioned earlier, we performed a Geotechnical Engineering Study on the adjacent northern and eastern properties in 200-1. The test pits we excavated in 2001 that are located adjacent to the subject property encountered 3 to 4 feet of loose fill overlying the native glacial till soils. The native soil conditions encountered in our previous study are consistent with the native soil conditions encountered for this study. Although not encountered in our test pits, boulders are often encountered scattered throughout glacial till soils. Groundwater Conditions No groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. The test pits were excavated in late fall. It is relatively common that groundwater is found in more permeable soil layers, pockets within the till, and perched between the near -surface weathered soil and the underlying glacial till. This perched groundwater is often localized and typically forms following extended wet weather. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. &Z �Oft 84th Avenue Edmonds, LLL December 22, 2005 JN 05481 Page 3 on the test pit logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation. The compaction of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soil will therefore be found in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backfill will need to be removed and replaced with structural fill during construction. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT ANY PARTY RELYING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. The test pits conducted for this study generally encountered dense to very dense native silty sand soils within 3 to 4 feet of existing grade. It is our opinion that conventional footings can be used for building support bearing on these dense to very dense soils or on compacted structural fill placed over these soils. Overexcavation may be required to remove loose, near -surface fill and native soils to expose the competent bearing soils. With the possibility of seepage and the moisture sensitivity of the silty sand, footing subgrades may need to be protected from disturbance by placing a mat of imported, granular fill. This prevents the subgrade soils from being softened under foot traffic during placement of foundation forms and reinforcing. We recommend that all existing topsoil and fill also be removed from beneath floor slabs. Where this does not occur, noticeable slab settlement relative to the foundations may occur. This recommendation is particularly important if "thickened slabs" will be used to support interior walls, shear walls, or columns in the buildings. The native soils encountered in the test pits are typical for the vicinity, but they are fine-grained, making them moisture sensitive. These soils can be reused as structural fill or pavement fill only if they are 1) placed in dry weather, and 2) at, or near, the optimum moisture content. Reusability of the on -site, native sands and silty sands as structural fill will be weather- and time -dependent. These soils were generally at, or slightly above, their optimum moisture content at the time of our explorations. Overly most to wet soils will need to be dried by aeration during dry, sunny days, or by the addition of cement to kiln dust. Generally, this type of earthwork will require hot weather and grading over larger areas. In confined areas, such as utility trenches or behind retaining walls, the on -site soils will be difficult to impossible to reuse and obtain adequate compaction if they are wet. As a result of this, wet weather earthwork on till sites are typically more difficult and expensive than on sites that are underlain by cleaner sands. Prior to paving, we recommend that a proof -roll be performed with a fully -loaded dump truck or other heavy piece of construction machinery to identify any yielding subgrade areas that would need to be removed and replaced with imported, granular structural fill. If yielding areas are encountered, some overexcavation may be required to remove these loose, near -surface soils. Additional recommendations on pavements can be found in a subsequent section of this report. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 84th Avenue Edmonds, LLAO* JN 05481 December 22, 2005 Page 4 Storm detention/retention facilities and other utilities are often installed below, or near, structures. The walls of storm vaults must be designed as either cantilever or restrained retaining walls, as appropriate. Wall pressures for the expected soil conditions are presented in the Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls section of this report. It is important that the portion of the structure above the permanent detained water level be backfilled with free -draining soil, as recommended for retaining walls. Should drainage not be provided, the walls must be designed for hydrostatic forces acting on the outside of the structure. The backfill for all underground structures must be compacted in lifts according to the criteria in the General Earthwork and Structural Fill section of this report. Trenches for underground structures and utilities should not cross a line extending downwards from a new or existing footing at an inclination of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). We should be consulted if these excavation zones will be exceeded for installation- of storm facilities or other utilities. The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the weather conditions that are encountered. A rocked construction access road should be extended into the site to reduce the amount of soil or mud carried'off the property by trucks and equipment. Wherever possible, this road should follow the alignment of planned pavements, and trucks should not be allowed to drive off of the rock -covered areas. Existing catch basins in, and immediately downslope of, the planned work areas should be protected with pre -manufactured silt socks. Cut slopes and soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic during wet weather. As with any project, additional erosion control measures may be required depending on conditions encountered during construction. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and recommendations. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site class definition is illustrated on Table No. 1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building Code (IBC). In accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the 2003 IBC, the site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type C (Very Dense Soil). The site soils are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction because of their dense nature. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed, dense glacial till. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 12 and 16 inches, respectively. Exterior footings should also be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for protection against frost and erosion. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL JN 05481 December 22, 2005 Page 5 prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. An allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings supported on competent native soil or on properly compacted structural fill, A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent native soil will be less than one inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: PARAME'rEll ULTIMATE VALUE e icient of Friction 0.45 Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Where: (I) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend maintaining a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above ultimate values. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS No significant retaining walls are expected for the development. However, walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Active Earth Pressure 35 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Soil Unit Weight 140 pcf Where: (I) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (!I) active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. * For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL-L December 22, 2005 V0 JN 05481 Page 6 The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. The values for friction and passive resistance are ultimate values and do not include a safety factor. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners or bends in the walls. This is intended to reduce the amount of cracking that can occur where a wall is restrained by a corner. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will,need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well -compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaininc i Wall Backfill and Wateriproofin Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. If the till soils can be adequately compacted as wall backfill, a minimum 12-inch width of free -draining sand and gravel should first be placed against the wall. For increased protection, drainage composites should be placed along cut slope faces, and the walls should be backfilled entirely with free -draining soil. The later section entitled Drainage Considerations should also be reviewed for recommendations related to subsurface drainage behind foundation and retaining walls. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof below -grade walls, or to prevent the formation of mold, mildew or fungi in interior spaces. Over time, the performance of subsurface drainage systems can degrade, subsurface groundwater flow GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL JN 05481 December 22, 2005 Page 7 patterns can change, and utilities can break or develop leaks. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where future seepage through the walls is not acceptable. This typically includes limiting cold -joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. There are a variety of different waterproofing materials and systems, which should be installed by an experienced contractor familiar with the anticipated construction and subsurface conditions. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion to the outside face of a wall is not considered waterproofing, and will only help to reduce moisture generated from water vapor or capillary action from seeping through the concrete. As with any project, adequate ventilation of basement and crawl space areas is important to prevent a build up of water vapor that is commonly transmitted through concrete walls from the surrounding soil, even when seepage is not present. This is appropriate even when waterproofing is applied to the outside of foundation and retaining walls. We recommend that you contact a specialty consultant if detailed recommendations or specifications related to waterproofing design, or minimizing the potential for infestations of mold and mildew are desired. SLABS -ON -GRADE The building floors can be constructed as slabs -on -grade atop existing non -organic soils, or on structural fill. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non -yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. Even where the exposed soils appear dry, water vapor will tend to naturally migrate upward through the soil to the new constructed space above it. All slabs -on -grade inside the buildings must be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of gravel or crushed rock that has a fines content (percent passing the No. 200 sieve) cf less than 3 percent and a sand content (percent passing the No. 4 sieve) of no more than 10 percent. This capillary break/drainage layer is not necessary if an underslab drainage system is installed. As noted by the American Concrete Institute (ACI) in the Guides for Concrete Floor and Slab Structures, proper moisture protection is desirable immediately below any on -grade slab that will be covered by tile, wood, carpet, impermeable floor coverings, or any moisture -sensitive equipment or products. ACI also notes that vapor retarders, such as 6-mil plastic sheeting, are typically used. A vapor retarder is defined as a material with a permeance of less than 0.3 US perms per square foot (psf) per hour, as determined by ASTM E 96. It is possible that concrete admixtures may meet this specification, although the manufacturers of the admixtures should be consulted. Where plastic sheeting is used under slabs, joints should overlap by at least 6 inches and be sealed with adhesive tape. The sheeting should extend to the foundation walls for maximum vapor protection. If no potential for vapor passage through the slab is desired, a vapor barrier should be used. A vapor barrier, as defined by ACI, is a product with a water transmission rate of 0.00 perms per square foot per hour when tested in accordance with ASTM E 96. Reinforced membranes having sealed overlaps can meet this requirement. In the recent past, ACI (Section 4.1.5) recommended that a minimum of 4 inches of well -graded compactable granular material, such as a 5/8 inch minus crushed rock pavement base, should be placed over the vapor retarder or barrier for protection of the retarder or barrier and as a "blotter" to aid in the curing of the concrete slab. Sand was not recommended by ACI for this purpose. However, the use of material over the vapor retarder is controversial as noted in current ACI literature because of the potential that the protection/blotter material can become wet between the time of its placement and the installation of the slab. If the material is wet prior to slab placement, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Q;2 Oft 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL December 22, 2005 JN 05481 Page 8 which is always possible in the Puget Sound area, it could cause vapor transmission to occur up through the slab in the future, essentially destroying the purpose of the vapor barrier/retarder. Therefore, if there is a potential that the protection/blotter material will become wet before the slab is installed, ACI now recommends that no protection/blotter material be used. However, ACI then recommends that, because there is a potential for slab cure due to the loss of the blotter material joint spacing in the slab be reduced, a low shrinkage concrete mixture be used, and "other' measures" (steel reinforcing, etc.) be used. ASTM E-1643-98 "Standard Practice for Installation of Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Earth or Granular Fill Under Concrete Slabs" generally agrees with the recent ACI literature. We recommend that the contractor, the project materials engineer, and the owner discuss these issues and review recent ACI literature and ASTM E-1 643 for installation guidelines and- guidance on the use of the protect io n/bI otter material. Our opinion is that with impervious surfaces that all means should be undertaken to reduce water vapor transmission. EXCA VA TIONS AND SLOPES Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. However, vertical cuts should not be made near property boundaries, or existing utilities and structures. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil at the subject site would generally be classified as Type A for the dense glacial till, and B for the near -surface soils. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height should not be excavated at an inclination steeper than 0.75:1 or 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), respectively, extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. Temporary cuts must not extend below a 1:1 (H:V) zone from footings without consideration by the geotechnical engineer. The above-recom mended temporary slope inclinations are based on the conditions exposed in our explorations, and on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. It is possible that variations in soil and groundwater conditions will require modifications to the inclination at which temporary slopes can stand. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. It is also important that surface water be directed away from temporary slope cuts. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Excavation, foundation, and utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. These recommendations may need to be modified if the area near the potential cuts has been disturbed in the past by utility installation, or if settlement -sensitive utilities are located nearby. All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial layer of soil. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL JN 05481 December 22, 2005 Page 9 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that foundation drains be used at the base of all foundation and earth -retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non -woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 5. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. No groundwater was observed during our field work. However, if seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Surface drains should be provided where necessary to prevent poncling of water behind foundation or retaining walls. PAVEMENTAREAS The pavement section may be supported on competent, native soil, or on structural fill compacted to a minimum 95 percent density based on Modified Proctor (ASTM Test Designation D-1557). Careful compaction of backfill over the around utilities is critical to prevent pavement settlement. Because the site soils are silty and moisture sensitive, we recommend that the pavement subgrade be in a stable, non -yielding condition at the time of paving. Granular structural fill or geotextile fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. To evaluate pavement subgrade strength, we recommend that a proof roll be completed with a loaded dump truck immediately before paving. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, an additional 12 inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in the section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt -treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily loaded areas are typically main driveways, clumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. Increased maintenance and more frequent repairs should be expected if thinner pavement sections are used. Water from planter areas and other sources should not be allowed to infiltrate into the pavement subgrade. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. As with GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 84th Avenue Edmonds, LLk JN 05481 December 22, 2005 Page 10 any pavements, some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected as the pavement ages. Cracks in the pavement should be sealed as soon as possible after they become evident, in order to reduce the potential for degradation of the subgrade from infiltration of surface water. For the same reason, it is also prudent to seal the surface of the pavement after it has been in use for several years. To provide for a design without the need for any maintenance or repair would be uneconomical. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. It is important that existing foundations be removed before site development. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill, including utility backfill, placed under, or close to, a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not sufficiently compacted, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Beneath footings, slabs 95% or walkways Filled slopes and behind 90% retaininq walls 95% for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1657-91 (Modified Proctor). The General section should be reviewed for considerations related to the reuse of on -site soils. Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. A"k, 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL(- JN 05481 December 22, 2005 Page 11 LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use',of 84th Avenue Edmonds LLC, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials and selective laboratory testing. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Our services also do not include assessing or minimizing the potential for biological hazards, such as mold, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site development. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. During the construction phase, we will provide geotechnical observation and testing services when requested by you or your representatives, Please be aware that we can only document site work we actually observe. It is still the responsibility of your contractor or on -site construction team to verify that our recommendations are being followed, whether we are present at the site or not. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. OOW 84th Avenue Edmonds, LL,- JN 05481 December 22, 2005 Page 12 The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 4 Test Pit Logs Plate 5 Typical Footing Drain Detail We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. GDB/MRM: esn Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Gerry D. Bautista, Jr. Geotechnical Engineer Mc EXPIRES I Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. (Source: Thomas Brothers GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. IVOR Street Guide and Directory) VICINITY MAP 23707 - 84th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Job No: Date: Plate: 05481 Dec.2005 Not To Scale 1 1 :1 4.0 (A Go ram no moom mommanommoom 00 moom 0 manomm mmommommommommoommoo — a moommom .......................................... a TP-4 a a ................... [:;a :: ............ :; TP-1 IM 0 0 momm 0 0 mm; ............ --------------------------- :� a Soloman Salomon MEMO no �mo�mm�m am MEMO: Legend NORTH Proposed Building 'P ...... Existing House/Garage (source: Site Plan; Ronald D. Johnson Architect, July, 20, 2005) Not To Scale GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 23707 - 84th Avenue West L Edmonds, Washington Job No: Date: Plate: 0548 Dec.2005 1 1 2 0 G TEST PIT I 10 15 CP 11�� 10 is opso Description jurange to gray, silty SAND, fine- to medium -grained, moist, loose to medium -den - becomes gray, with fine- to medium -grained sand lenses, medium -dense - becomes very dense (Glacial Till) • Test Pit was terminated at 5 feet on December 16, 2005. • No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. TEST PIT 2 Topsoil Description ..... 10range to gray, silty SAND, fine- to medium -grained, moist, loose to medium -der - becomes gray, with fine- to medium -grained sand lenses, dense - becomes very dense (Glacial Ti"i • Test Pit was terminated at 4.5 feet on December 16, 2005. • No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. • No caving was observed during excavation. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TEST PIT LOGS 23707 - 84th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Job Logged by: Plate: 05481 DDaetce 2 0 0 5 1 GDB 1 37 5 10 15 e, qi, 0 0j KY 5 10 is TEST PIT 3 Description opso rown, Silty bAND, fine- to medium -grained, moist, loose - becomes gray, with fine- to medium -grained sand lenses, medium -dense to den - becomes very dense (Glacial Till) • Test Pit was terminated at 5.6 feet on December 16, 2005. • No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. • No caving was observed during excavation. TEST PIT 4 concrete aeDris Old Topsoil Description 1:, S­ 10range/brown, silty SAND, fine- to medium -grained, moist, loose - becomes orange/gray to gray, moist, medium -dense - becomes very dense (Glacial Till) • Test Pit was terminated at 5.5 feet on December 16, 2005. • No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. • No caving was observed during excavation. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TEST PIT LOGS 23707 - 84th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Job Date: 00, 1 Logged by. I Plate: 05481 Dec. 2 GDB 4:] ria r.0 Slope backfill away from foundation. Provide surface drains where necessary. 2..=- Washed Roc (7/8" min. size) 411 min. Backfill (See text for requirements) Nonwoven Geotextile Filter Fabric - Tightline Roof Drain (Do not connect to footing drain) Possible Slab 50 6 .0 0 000. oo 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0;0 -0.0. 0 0.*d" .0.*.' 0 . . . .": .0'. - ..0- Z.o -:0 00 O� "T" 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) Vapor Retarder/Barrier and Capillary Break/Drainage Layer (Refer to Report text) NOTES: (1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage, waterproofing, and slab considerations. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 23707 - 84th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington I Job Date: Scale: Plate: 1 05481 Dec. 2005 1 Not to Scale 1 57 xc --CR�(�6 I/ re. 1�74 i &,,&, It NEW ROOF SHEATHING 12 NEW ROOFING 4 2x Solid fra ing 24" O.C. EXISTIN$ rOOF SHEATHING EXISTIN(t MUSSES 24" O.C. REVISED PLAN APPROVED CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION PLANS EXAMINER DATE 4:12 APPROVED BY PLANNING '�-L6L-t� 0b--)-+.2-'D1j 0 ),02 " ha le- Fe-r �^-7 A,r,� uA,,.A(j. OVERFRAME DETAIL SCALE 1" = 1' L :1 ,,��4: 12 s 'Y� 6j) ::::RK:::(n:) 0 F FEE K �153 FEEE C, T 11 V E NTS BLD2-0 ib -qW & BLD2-01 0-0%p,-7 23709/23711 84THAVEW. REVISED ROOF DETAIL 3/1/11 co Of Mrfml ity December 17, 2010 us V ED PLAN Plan revision submittal for B 20 rRO 090210 and BLDZ-0090'211 We are submitting a change to the roof in order to meet the "plain meaning" of the code as described by the City of Edmonds Attorney W. Scott Snyder. The buildings above are finished and approved except for not meeting the "plain meaning" or the second portion of the number (I.) footnote of the table A of ECDC 16.30.030. See below: 16.30.030 Site development standards. A. Table. Minimum Lot Area Per Minimu Minimum 3 Dwelling In Minimum Minimum Parking Unit 4 Street Side Rea r Maximum Maximum (Spaces Subdistrict , (Sq. Ft.) Setback 2 Setback 2 Setback Height Coverage Per Unit) RM-1.5 1,500 15' 10, 15' 25 #1,5 45% 2 RM-EW 1,500 15' 10, 15' 25 #5,6,7 45% 2 RM-2.4 2,400 15' 10, 15' 2 5'1, 5 45% 2 RM-3 3,000 15' 15' 15' 2511'5 45% 2 1 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. Our proposed change to the roof plan will meet the portion of the footnote that says "if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater." The City of Edmonds Municipal Code has very few definitions. Fortunately it does have the following definitions that are very helpful in defining what a "roof" is and what is not. 21.85.070 Roof. RECEIV. EM Roof means the top covering of a building or structure. DEC 17 2010 DEVELOPMENT SERVM CTFL CRY OF EDMONDS 21.90.150 Structure. Structure means a combination of materials constructed and erected permanently on the ground or attached to something having a permanent location on the ground. Not included are residential fences less than six feet in height, retaining walls, rockeries, and similar improvements of a minor character less than three feet in height. 21.10.040 Building. Building means any structure having a roof, excluding all forms of vehicles even though immobilized. (See also, Accessory Building and Completely Enclosed Building.) A roof is the top covering of a building or structure. A building is a structure with a roof. Roof is not a combination of materials erected on the ground. Roof is not a structure and it is not a building. If we substitute the definition of roof into the second part of the footnote in 16.30.030 we have the following: "if all portions of the top covering of the building above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater." We are submitting a change to the top covering of the building. According to the email below "there is no size maximum or minimum" to the sloped involve with the top covering of the building. ----- Original Message ----- From: "W. Scott Snyder" <ssnyder(a)omwlaw.com> To: "Stephen A. Bernheim" <steve(d)stevebernheim.com> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 2:40 PM Subject: RE: View Corridors @ 523 Alder It's the flip side of plain meaning --these are "portions of the roof...over 25 feet" "sloped" to at least 4 in 12 As I understand from the plans, all of the rooflets are sloped at greater than 4 in 12 and are over 25 feet and under 30 feet. The ordinance refers to all "portions," so the ordinance permits this type of "design." There is no size maximum or minimum. Since single family homes don't go through ADB review, the silliness of the design (its "modulation") is not regulated. I, as have you, have watched a number of councilmembers draw just this sort of saw tooth design in the course of discussing the height limitations. My take is that the rooflets conform to the letter of the regulation. Scott W. Scott Snyder Ogden Murphy Wallace P.L.L.C. 1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 2100 Seattle, WA 98101 ssnyder@omwlaw.com 206.447.7000 206.447.0215 (fax) We hope this is enough information for your approval. Please let me know if you need anything else. Sincerely, V Robin W. Michel 12 12 , \7 .40 METAL ROOFING DETAI 5CALE: Y=l' SLOPE OF THE ROOF IS rDCA-rCD -rLJ A KI A. 1 -1 ROOF FEK5PECTIVE NTS BLD20090210 & BLD20090211 23707/23709 84TH AVE W. oil :Is oil 411 all Nil milli I kill& I-TrTr"l Milli 1111 liaillf 01.11 Bill I milli dil't 6.111 Nil !111 NONNI =1111 111111 still milli a WHA AVI'o 10 -11-1 - �-- - - - - --;,. I -I -I 11 Jill - - - - - - - — - Jill, its 11 "AlluMlifla I IN tills 11111 11111 All —1131911001A lolls :: Z 1: vio- # DEN URPHY L t",I_ A, f-A. E A f 1 0 X N L Y S A V I A V, MEMORANDUM DATE: August 28, 2009 TO: Edmonds City Council Members City of Edmonds FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney RE: Interpretation of Height and Slope Provisions Because the staff has revised its interpretation and brought it in line with the opinions expressed in this memo, I will not review the specific fact pattern. This memo applies the maxims of construction with the interpretation of the provisions of ECDC 16.30.030. Height limits are set for the various zones of the City. For example, ECDC 16. _3 ) 0. 03 0 establishes site development standards for the multi -family zone. The height limit is generally a maximum 25 feet, provided, however, that footnote I to that subsection provides: Roof only may extend five feet above the state height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches and twelve inches or greater. Emphasis added. In addition, the definition of "height" in ECDC 21.40.030 (D) contains a number of exceptions. Five specific exemptions are provided for: 1. Church steeples; 2. Elevator penthouses (not to exceed three feet in height); 3. Chimneys (not to exceed three feet) ; 4. Vent pipes (not to exceed 18 inches); and 5. Standpipes (not to exceed 30 inches). A Membor ofdw I ntemational I awyeis Nowmk wit h in (1,,pmdent raemb�n law fimis �,,,oi Id wido, 1601 H I th A verme, Suite 2100 *Seatfle, WA 9S 10 1 -1 6M - 206.147.7000 - htv 206.4,17,02 15 Web. www.on1wlaw.eom fWSS739897.DOC;1\00006.900000\ � DISCUSSION When interpreting a zoning ordinance, the primary objective is "to'determine and . effectuate'the local legislative body's intent." Jones v. King County, 74, ' W!a;sh.1 App. 467, 475 (1994). Ordinances are not to be construed in a manner which leads to an unlikely, unrealistic, strained or absurd result. Alderwood Water District v. Pope and Talbot, Inc.,, 62 Wn.2d 319, 321 (1963). When an ordinance defines specific terms, the definitions control. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce County, 148 Wn.2d 451, 472 (2003). It is appropriate to consult a dictionary to determine the meaning of terms that are undefined by ordinance. Peter Schroeder Architects, A L4 v. City (?f Bellevue, 83 Wash. App. 188, 192 (1996). The expression of certain terms implies the exclusions of others and specific language controls general provisions. Wildner v. City Winslow, 35 Wash. App. 383 (1999); In Re MB, 101 Wash. App. 425 (2000). Applying those principles, the plain meaning of the City's ordinance is that the roof only may extend over the height limit and that in order to extend above the height limit, all portions of the roof must have a slope of four and twelve. Because the ordinance provides: for five specific exemptions (chimneys, standpipes, vents, etc.), no other exceptions are to be permitted. Under the maximum of administrative deference, the courts have traditionally deferred -- at least to some extent -- to statutory interpretations made by administrative officials charged with enforcing an ordinance. Tuerk v. Department of Licensing, 123 Wn.2d 120, 126 (1994). ("The power to enforce a regulation implies the concomitant authority to, interpret that regulation"). The judiciary's deference in this context stems from the recognition that the agency has the "expertise and insight gained from administering a regulation that ... the reviewing court do[es] not possess." Silver Streak, Inc. v. Department qfLabor & Industries, 159 Wn.2d 868, 884 (2007). In the zoning context, the Washington Supreme Court has stated: It is likewise valid for an administrative agency to 'fill in the gaps' via statutory construction -- as long as the agency does not purport to 'amend' the statute. Mall, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 369, 378 (1987). (citation omitted). This deference has been limited, however. An administrative interpretation may only be given deference, it is never authoritative. Alelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc., 160 Wn.2d 173, 184 (2007). The most important factor, however, is that administrative deference is given DDIY in the event that an ordinance is ambiguous. Tahoma A udubon Society v. Park Junction Partners, 128 Wash. App. 671, 682 (2005). A term is ambiguous if it is amenable to different, reasonable interpretations. tWSS739897.DOC;1\00006.900000\ ) A* Ibid— An ordinance is not ambiguous "simply because different interpretations area conceivable." Tahoma, 128'. Wash. App. at 682. Absent genuine ambiguity, deference to a local agency's interpretation' of a zoning regulation is improper. Jbid, City:of Pasco v. Public Emplo�,ee lRelations ComthisqQn, 119 Wn.2d 504, 507 (1992). If a regulation is unambiguous, it is inappropriate to look beyond the plain meaning of the regulation's terms. Washington Cedar rd Supply Cm., Inc, v. State Department of'Labor & Industries, 137 Wash. A p. 592,.,599 p (2007)., Rules of cdnstruction are inapplicable where the text of an ordinance is clear and explicit.. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce County, 148 Wn.2d 45'1, 4117472 (2003). e In my opinicqC, the definition of height and the provisions' of the' ordinance in ques I tio,n:, 16.30.030, are unambiguous. While crickets, drainage ways and � ut ' ' ' g, ters are certainly appropriate construction techniques approved under the Washington State, Building Code, no exemption from the height limit is granted under the height definition. In this' c o�ntext, the zoning ordinance is unambiguous -- all portions of the roof above 25 feet must have a four inch in twelve inch slope. An agency's past history of erroneously interpreting a zoning ordinance does.not prevent the agency from discontinuing its former practice and enforcing the ordinance correctly. Northlake Marine, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources, 134 Wash. App;. 272, 293 -94 (2006); Dykstra v. Skagit County, 97 Wash. App. 667, 677 (1999). Misunderstanding or misinterpretation of a statute or ordinance by those charged with i ' ts enforcement does not alter its meaning or create a substitute enactment. Fabian Point Neighbors v. City of Mercer Island, 102 Wash. App. 775, 781 (2000). Instead, both the agency and affected landowners "are bound by the ordinance as written" -- not by how the ordinance has been applied to other parties in the past. Jbid An agency's historical practice will, however, impact the amount of deference afforded to its interpretation of a particular regulation. Thp Washington Supreme Court has refused to grant deference where the evidence demonstrated that the challenged interpretation was "nothing more than an isolated action" by the agency. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosely, 1] 8 Wn.2d 801, 815 (1992). CONCLUSION In summary, the staff s interpretation was certainly logical in terms of the building code and the past practice of interpretation by the City's Architectural Design Board. Crickets are a normal and ordinary part of construction practice. However, the City's ordinance is clear and unambiguous. In that context, neither the Architectural Design Board nor the City staff have the ability to vary what is the clear directive of the Council. As always, clear language can yield unintended consequences, and the staff is currently working with the City Council to review the bulk limitations regarding height. 609 0 (WSS739897.DOC; 1 \00006.900000\ ) CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPAF-�'MEW,- 'WORK 1-6p -it APPROVED BY PLANNING u 'ITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPAP �IWGRK fADDRE �'GVVNER� 10 W Ru ICA APPROVED By PLANNING 4. 0 u RECEIVED DEC 17 2010 DEVRDPMMT SBWM CTR MY OF E)MONN k4cwF �(W- L(L'U6 bjjL'L4l50lj VM16 NOTE: THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON VISUAL LOCATION OF MANHOLES, VAULTS, VALVES, ETC. AND BY UTILITY RECORDS OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS.. ALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES THAT MIGHT BE PRESENT AND NOT SHOWN, ARE UNKNOWN TO CONTINENTAL SURVEYING CO. 23GTH 5T. 5.W. N 88*36'51 " W FND. M.I.C. 'F\/ISITED: 5-20-05 0 -30'- LOT 11 sz� 1�1 WOOD .8 + FENCE + 30.00 '50 2.0' E 9&47' + + CP 04 tK L101 27.4 OVERHEAD SERVICE 65N GATEPOSTS 1 STORY WOOD UTIL. Llt:E FRAME GARAGE 1.4" EAVE & GUTTER N.&S. FACE 11,50 .> 1.0 EAVE W. FACE c6 DRIVEWAY 1.5 EAVE E FACE N C14 Ntp NIP GATEPOSTS 3&0 C.B. YARD 15.5 DRAIN RIM EL.=450.68 r7l 0 Ln 41 0 5 --Ito WM THIS MAP REPRESENTS AN ELECTRONIC DATA FILE DEVELOPED BY CONTINENTAL SURVEYING CO. CONTINENTAL HOLDS A HARD COPY REPRESENTATION OF THIS FILE AND THAT HARD COPY IS THE ORIGINAL. ANY CHANGE TO THE DATA CONTAINED IN THIS FILE IS CONSIDERED UNAUTHORIZED, UNLESS REVIEWED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SURVEYOR. ANY REUSE OR ADAPTATION OF THIS FILE IS AT THE USER'S RISK, UNLESS REVIEWED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SURVEYOR FOR SUITABILITY. > U _j > 00 V) z w M n CL V) ui + FND. EXIST. REBAR NO CAP 451-46 E. END FENCE 0.4 S. & 0.4 W. OF NE PROP. COR. 0.97 r""-�FENCE 0.4 E. TEPS FND. EXIST. REBAR 1�1� 16' 04 69 479 NO CAP 1/1411 83036 51*W x 450.90 bAr 22.29 + -%'5010.0 13.95 15�1 as 0 q/ COVERED "? Fbl� PORCH & > 15' �� C� 46A, e lz� CATCH BASINJ (C.B.) RIM EL.: '9 9 w w L) z In Ld C4 u- 0 0 3il z e zp 30.00 + 191 -30'- 0 STEPS 00 C, N-1 32.01 e* + OIC- 77717 7 7-773a 3.8 11.95 0 6.2 1�1 IrIn %, RUTLAND ACIRIE'2-:)� TO . F In In KD �0 2.2/ P= + + Z 1 STORY WOOD FRAME VISO HOUSE W/BASEMENT . D .1 415 .49 5.0 0 C3 + STAIRS z 0 FIN. FLOOR L16 7.0 CL . I I EL.=455.75 46 LOT 12 r'� 9 z / < 32.11 4) 00 f 32.1 0.40 EAVES N.&S. FACES �2 + 1,0 EAVES P12. REBAR E.&W. FACES 1 0 " 'P W \FEXIST. CAP #22969 d) WOOD WOOD 00 SHED A'b 32.71 .85 777ND FENCE yo -7� 464�-.- J- 1 x 449,7 0. 2 E. & 0. 4 S. IN 88*36'510 90.01Y OF SW PROP. COR. z w zi 0 z < w w w z :r U-1 u- 0 0 (n LL < w C\l .0 0 ui C� 0 0� 0 z 00:2� u- 0 0 00 U) d I? V) d bi C� 0 C� N 238TH 5T. 5.W. FND. M.I.C. VISITED: 5-20-05 FND.. EXIST. REBAR W/LS CAP #22969 Km ls� ufje- � q qC 00tll 1� + Sl tLocf. + e rp 5.92 x 450.02 WOOD _f WCE IS ON LINE HERE + -0 z 0 0 + 15" 1?0 Ld Z -i z 0 Ld L) Ld zm W LLJ u- 2: -S. END FENCE 0.1 N. OF SE pNPROP. COR. )Q -Z3 L A K [9) A L L � H a GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) I inch = 10 & LEGEND.:,, rul DENOTES FOUND CASED CONCRETE MONUMENT wf�4 e DENOTES SET REBAR WITH LS CAP #8566 0 DENOTES FOUND EXISTING REBAR PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: THE WEST 90.00 FEET OF LOT 12, AND THE EAST 8.47 FEET OF THE WEST 98.47 FEET OF1 THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 12, BLOCK 1, FRUITLAND�ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER ACCORDING TO THE 1ORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SNOHbmISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ELEVA11ONS: REFER TO SURVEY CONTROL DATABASE - POINT 0: 44 NAVD: 88. A STANDARD USCI& GS DISK, STAMPED "Q467 1966". SET VERTICALLY IN THE NORTHWEST FACE OF THE CON.CRETE FOUNDATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF MEYRING SURVEYORS AT 23423 HIGHWAY 99, LYNNWOOD. ELEV. = 407.985 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT AREA = 9253 SQ. FT. )C CT, AV.4�WlDq - �W6C 'L 4- 6wt REFERENCED: R.O.S. #7705090196 IN VOL 5, PG. 140, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PLAT OF FRUITLAND ACRES To LAKE BALLINGER IN VOL. 10, PG. 47, RECORDS F SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. NOTE: WE HAVE SURVEYE THE PROPERTY DESCRIPBED IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FURNIS ED BY PAT ARCHER. WE HAVE NOT EXAMINED THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SURVEYED OR IT'S ADJOINERS. fAILCAU C)0�5'(Joo to (101., OWN*., bulAr "a�- tib'67 NO mis(tow. �b 6ilw1jwAh" kobw( - Slio kv6 W, bl. NA (2-� CONTINENTAL SURVEYING CO. 10007 GREENWOOD AVE N. P.O. BOX 33725 SEATTLE, WA 98133 (206) 783-7177 FAX (206) 789-5568 EMAIL: Iandsurveyors@comcast.net �'tLE RECEIVED FEB - 7 2006 BUILDING DEPT. PREPARED FOR PAT ARCHER DWN. BY. N.A.P� DATE.. 6-6-05 JOB NO.: 05093 CHKD. BY- F.W,,F. Ts7c: I" = 101 SHEET I OF I 411 Ap I RECEIVED FEB - 7 2006 BUILDING DEPT. FND. M. VISITED: 5-20-C N 58.36'51 W DIS �,j F W CLEAN our Dowmspour COLLECTOR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 PROPOSED YARD DRAIN 0 Uj z C ROVIDE ACP TRANSITION FROM PROPOSED /R LO " ;� Uj ................ ... SID LOT 11 SIDEWALK TO EXISTING GRADE TO NORTH E RAMP AT 12:1 MAX. ........ HAVE lu FILTE SOC NEW POWER PEDESTAL ........................... . .. ........................... .............. A .......... ...... . ...... --- ­* ............ ­ 1 61 (b t-l�p &P, WOOD FENCE 1�(EXISTING) I VE AND ....................... j:'.*.,.,** CIS: 4 r'OSE OF i TING AC P ...................... '�7 7 75 LF 21 0 CMP S=.S% 'EWAY­�. .............. 7! e 4 .: _j, .4 - . .. , .. . ................ . TS, : . ............ I.. ................... ........... .... ...... . "50,0, EX nNG H 4SININ 1IRMA110N EXISTING CB #11 TYPE I RIM ELEV. 449-64 S. IE 446.59, 12" PVC N. & E. IE 446.59, 12" 0 PVC (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INVERT ELEVATION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES) ROUTE DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR @ 16 0.5% MIN. SLOPE :?5' TO CB TYP. CB #4 . . . . . IV %JFX MZ aRl.JVVjV ..................... .................. N, E DOOR :io ..................................... . 1% GARAG ... ............ ... AND REMOVE I ..::.: ... Lro EXISTING TO ... is ROP I'w 45& ......... .................. ............. 17 8.8% ...... .............. . PROVIDE NEAT 0 ................. . : ... on, tk�j A& ............... ........ ....................... ... ..... ........ BUTTJOIN ...... D EWAY 6 24'WIDE DRIVEWAY/ DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE PER CITY STANDARD SEE DETAIL E2.26 CONSTRUCTION DETAIL E 1.2 ON ENTRANCE PER PAGE 413 PROPOSED SWIDE CONC. SIDEWALK W/ CURB AND GUTTER (PER EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS (E2.8 & E2.13) ON PAGE 4B WIDEN 84TH AVE W. ROW AS SHOWN -SHADED AREA(ROAD CONSTRUCTION PER EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL (E2.01.3) ON PAGE 4B) *SEE PLAN BY OTHERS FOR WATER & SEWER SERVICE LINES ........................ SLOF IE 0 ................................... ... .... ...... ........... . ..... .... ........ : .......... .... 0 . , .0 . ...... .4 . A r= U, ae co .. F_- ............... ............... . ................ ................... ... .. ........... ... .. .............. -A 0 z .......... ..... gm;, .., - ­ce VW.. 4 : -4; CO# U > < co 3: Lli > ......... ... ..... .. .................. ....... ... ......... .... - . .-. .4 . - .74 M ` - . ._ .: ... . 4 .4. .4 'to ................... 4'. zr .. - 4% X4 A -0 . 'IF p' - - .0 WC 150 04 -Go .................... ru"Uox /4./ .. :SL4D0Ik6 5, 0 A! 00% 4. �',$LOPE,::�Q'S Yl 0- x < ............. .......... ......... :: ............. LOCATI 4 .7 Ld 7o LU .......... ..... tn WO ................. . ........... . . ae :D 3: YELLO TE . .. ........ Ax '77q 0 __j Cu ...... .................... ... ....... . .... .... .. ... ... %*.'.'.'..,:#.%.,.,.,:."., YD 0A 115' .... .......... ­.. ­ 1 CURBI GUT-1. ER: 14 .4*,-. 17 ­1 SLOPE - 0 SOO a 8 LF 6 0 Pvc. .. ....... ............. ..... X .. ...... 4. SLOPE=0.50% -01 E USTING C ;4LTER B. To HAVE SO CK ........................ 02 EXIST;` Q8'-::-#-­ll*- ............ .............. : J: ............ V .7 Sig 'A -,CP P-. t. �, ...................... -­.,_,.,_,.,. .................... ... 30.00 , X \ CF:�� 13 G 0 PVC 12 EXISTIN EXIS­R EXISrIf SIDEW) Cq 449.75- '\POTENTIAL 5% 's<'\INSTALL 210 LF CP FOOTING DRA 6A/ TIED IN AFTER CB #2 OF SILT FENCE ACP Ql 0 SEE TIGHTLINE NOTE PER DETAIL E 0 d @ RIGHT 1.1 ON PAGE 46 0 Cq EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 238TH 5T. 5.W. T_ FND. M.I.C. VISITHD: 5-2C -05 MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK GRADE AND ALIGNMENT Ald 10 N 451.46 450-97 160 NO 450.90 CH MIN IN )RIMAMON CB #1, TYPE I RIM ELEV. 451-40 IE 447.05 121, 0 CMP CB #2, TYPE 2 48" 0 RIM ELEV. 450.2 W. IE 446.67, 12" 0 CMP (CONTROL TEE) N. IE 446.67, 21" 0 CMP (DETENTION PIPE) E. IE 447.07, 15" 0 CPEP NE. IE 446.67, 6" 0 PVC (DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR) CB #3, TYPE IL RIM ELEV. 451.2 S. & E. IE 447.11 211, 0 CMP CB #4, TYPE IL RIM ELEV. 451.2 S. & W. IE 447.49, 21" 0 CMP SW. IE 448.49, 6" 0 PVC CB #5, TYPE I RIM ELEV. 451.0 W. IE 447.42, 15" 0 CPEP (DETENTION PIPE) N. IE 448,49, 6" 0 PVC (D/S COLLECTOR) YD #1 SOLID BASE YD #IA SOLID BASE RIM ELEV. 450.2 RIM ELEV. 450.5 IE 446.71 61' 0 PVC IE 446.85, 6" 0 PVC CB #6 CB #6, 7 AND 8 SHALL BE RIM ELEV. 449.20 CUZ DRWY CB (TRAFFIC S & E IE 446.93, 6" 0 PVC RATED) OR APPROVED CB #7 EQUAL. RIM ELEV. 449.15 W & E IE 447.05, 6" 0 PVC CB #8 AP RIM ELEV. 449js W IE 447.21, 6" 0 PVC B 4 E L C I # Typ M KR E 451 .2 7 .4 21 0 CMP 0 PVC S a W S IE:448 49, 6 BLOCK I 04 Fl M Ell TAI EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED NOTE: TIGHTLINE NEW ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUTS INTO DETENTION PIPE. IF FOOTING DRAIN IS INSTALLED, RUN FOOTING DRAINS (SEPARATE FROM DOWNSPOUT DRAINS) INTO STORM DRAIN LINE AFTER CATCH BASIN #2, BUT PRIOR TO LEAVING PROPERTY *FOOTING DRAINS NOT REQvD FOR SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION ON PER IBC 1807.1 ci b 1-3 \:ROUTE - DOWNSPOUT Vd _q/0 COLLECTOR @ 1?70 0.5% MIN. SLOPE TO CB, TYP. �7 &A RE, al� ;'_Z AlK. -20 "t Aw 77 l�'! 11111,­ 1111 ,g W�A �t,,77,77 0 10 20 (IN FEET) 1 inch 10 ft. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ESC WINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: STABLIZATION OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABLIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMP'S, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMP'S SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30. SEE ADDITIONAL ESC DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS ON SHEET 4C CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. SCHEDULE AND ATTEND PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING W/ CITY OF EDMONDS BY CALLING (425) 771-0220 2. PROVIDE: CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR LIMITS OF CLEARING, LINE AND GRADE OF UTILITIES AND MISC. STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS. 3. INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (TESC) MEASURES AS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS. 4. SAWCUT AND REMOVE PAVEMENT FROM AREAS TO RECEIVE LANDSCAPE, BUILDING, OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. 5. CLEAR, GRUB AND HAUL MATERIAL FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSE OF AS REQUIRED. 6. ROUGH GRADE FOR PROPOSED ROAD CONSTRUCTION, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, AND UTILITY ALIGNMENTS. 7. CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS (DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVING, ETC.) 8. PERFORM FINAL GRADING, CLEANUP, AND APPLICATION OF GROUNDCOVER. 9. REMOVE TESC MEASURES. THE WEST 90.00 FEET OF LOT 12, AND THE EAST 8.47 FEET OF THE WEST 98.47 FEET OF THE NORTH '30.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 12, BLOCK 1, FRUITLAND ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALSO KNOWN AS: 23707 84TH AVE. W. EDMONDS, WA ELEVATIONS: REFER TO SURVEY CONTROL DATABASE - POINT ID: 44 NAVD: 88. A STANDARD USC & GS DISK, STAMPED "Q407 1965", SET VERTICALLY IN THE NORTHWEST FACE OF THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF MEYRING SURVEYORS AT 23423 HIGHWAY 99, LYNNWOOD. ELEV. = 407.985 FEET NOTES: - CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHICH CAN AREA 9253 SQ. FT. (212 ACRES) NOT BE STORED ON SITE WILL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE AT A IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALC. COMMERCIAL FACILITY. ON SITE ONLY- - 2230 BLDG. 1- 2230 BLDG. 2 DUST CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING PERIODS OF DRY ACCESS- 1860 WEATHER. SIDEWALKS- 510 APPBOVED AS NOTED TOTAL- 6830 (.157 ACRES) AVG. EXISTING HEIGHT- 450.51 BY ENGINEERIN!& I n� - -_ B-449.5 IS SOIL TO BE REMOVED FROM SITE FINISH SLA BOTTOM OF FOOTING-448.0' Date: 60' X 80' X 1' DEEP= 178 CY SOIL DISTURBANCE 63' WIDE X 83' LONG X 2.5' DEEP= 484 CY (AT BUILDING & DRIVEWAY) 24' WIDE X 12' LONG X 1' DROP AT ACCESS= 10.7 CY TOTAL= 495 CY J\e_-T014A 12-VV15(oo 0jjuq jol:�,Tg_mTtotj f IpFl Adpv,-D _C1315 4 vIpfF_ftDlw,0 W BY _D ST R ENGINEERING APPRONIF ate, 0 /1,36-07 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S STAMP APPLIES ONLY TO STORM DRAINAGE REVISION NOV. 10, 2009 LLJ < LU < LLJ z LT.] C) U \EN 04L��Z(A LU U C\1 Z Ln (-) LLJ Z Q < >lu!�� < cl cz m N 0 0'� z SHEET 18 ALUMINUM ROD, Y2 to 0 STOCK HANDLE TO F 18" MAX. FROM RIM W/ GATE DOWN CN OVERFLOW ELEV. TO PROVIDE DETENTION MIN AND OIL SEPARATION =L== ELEV. 448.57 TION PIPE SUPPORTS BOLTED W/ EMBED 2 IN WALL, 3" X 0.90 UAUL MIN. 12 It PVC _,,dULILNIIUN Ill-L _,,mU.n7, MIN OF 2 SUPPORTS AT CMP TO MAX. 3' SPACING S=0.5% PVC COUPLER IE 446.67 IE 447.11 IE 446.67 ;z 12 0 CMP RISER,------' _c\j RESTRICTOR PLATE W/ A 0.63" ORIFICE SHARP EDGED, SHOP DRILLED CONTROL STRUCTURE, CATCH BASIN #2 TYPE 2 VOLUME REQUIRED (537 CU. FT.) VOLUME PROVIDED (542 CU. FT.) wwww5l 11' MIN, as-sm- - - (TYP) L) zo 40' MIN. R,[I,W. 11' MIN. m 2 % M I T 2' MIN AC PAVEMENT S., 8� r _STC 2' - 5/8' CSTC PAVEMENT COMPACTION- 92% 4'- 1-1/4' CSBC 24 SHOULDER (TYPICAL) RICE DENSITY APPROVED SUBGRADE SUBGRADE,BASE,TOP COURSE COMPACTION 95% (ASTM 698) RESIDENTIAL /COMMERCIAL ACCESS Scale, NTS = 11-00 1004 0 MIN, RADIUS 4'-8' QUARRY SPALLS 8'-12' MIN. DEPTH .0 %lp kp PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ EGRESS AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTRO MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. l.? STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Scalei NTS = it -Of ELEV. 448.57 REMOVABLE - WATERTIGHT COUPLING OR FLANGE ORIFICE L IE 448.15 CONTROL STRUCTURE '004 RIM ELEV. 450.3 SLOTTED GRATE f RIM ELEV. 451.2 1 1" (POLY COATED) . z co TYPE MANHOLE STEPS (.0 0. C. LOCATED @ 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 LF 21 0 CMP MAX. W.S. 7LI ELEV. 448.57 ,-ELBOW RESTRICTOR SECONDARY ORIFICE 75 LF 21" 0 CMP TO PER DETAIL THIS CB #4, S= .5% SHEET PER PLAN CATCH BASIN #3 TYPE 1L DETENTION PIPE ELEVATION. NOT TO SCALE 12 $$ 0 CMP RISER 4# --T '00'( 4"MAX 4" 0 ELBOW RESTRICTOR PLATE W/ A 1.08" ORIFICE (FRACTIONAL EQUIVALENT 1-5/64") SHARP EDGED, SHOP DRILLED ELBOW RESTRICTOR NOT TO SCALE BINDING WIRE OR n EXCAVATE TRENCH 8' DEEP TWINE WHERE STRAW BALES WILL BE PLACED AND STAKE BALES. COMPACTED SOIL j 71 PREVENT PIPING 7 CROSS SECTION OF A PROPERLY INSTALLED STRAW BALE BARRIER TWO STAKES PER BALE TO MAINTAIN POSITION STRAW BALES AS REQUIRED. PROPER PLACEMENT OF STRAW BALE BARRIER IN A DRAINAGE WAY CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL, CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN, STRAW BALE DAM FILTRATION SYSTEMS Scale- NTS = 11-08 RE DE N OTES: 1. NEW PIPE SHALL BE 12 )) 0 CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. METAL PARTS SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT. GALVANIZED PIPE PARTS TO HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER. 3. FRAME, GRATE AND RISER SHALL BE OFFSET SO CLEANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP, AND CLIMB DOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER AND CLEANOUT GATE. .-I CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR V R I' BATTER 4. 1'R 0,05 FT/FT CU 4 '4 4 A 6' A .4 4' 4 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18' STANDARD 24' APTERIAL w PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S STAMP 7"Or' APPLIES ONLY TO STORM DRAINAGE REVISION NOV. 10, 2009 NOTESs 1. FORMS SHALL BE TRUE TO LINE AND GRADE AND SECURELY STAKED. 2. THRU JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED ADJACENT TO CATCH BASINS, 3. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE EVERY 10 FEET AND DUMMY JOINTS EVERY 5 FEET, 4. THRU JOINTS SHALL HAVE 1/2' TO 5/8' WIDE PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER, 5. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 3000PS1. 6. FINISH SHALL BE LIGHT BROOM. 7. CURB SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH CLEAR CURING COMPOUND OR SHALL BE COVERED AND KEPT MOIST FOR 72 HOURS. 8, ALL SIDEWALKS POURED BEHIND CURB IN DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE 6' THICK OVER 2' OF CSTC WITH SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY. 2,0�S STANDARD -TYPE A" CURB/GUTTER J Scatei NTS = 11-08 - 5/8' MINUS CSTC CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN, 1 173"� TEMP, SEDIMENT TRAP FOR CATCH BASINS ) Scate- NTS = 11-00 FILTER FABRIC - SECURED TO 2' X 2' 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC EQUAL 2' X 2' WOOD OR. EQUIVALENT 8'- 12' NOTEi A- IF DRIVEWAY WIDTH EXCEEDS 15', INSTALL A FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT. DRIVEWAY APRON SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6' THICK AND SHALL BE PLACED ON 2' OF 5/8' CSTC AND COMPACTED GRADE. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 300OPSI 1/2' LIP JOINT OR 16' VERTICAL CrURJB� (TO MATCH EXIST. ONLY) EXPANSION JOINT ' CURB DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITIONAL DETAIL FOR CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE PGURED CURB AND GUTTER OR VERTICAL CURBS SEPARATELY FRDM THE SIDEWALK, CITY INSPECTIGN REQUIRED LIN FDRM WGRK PRIDR TO PDUR. u. .... �l Eqg 80 FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CON US ROLLS. USE STAPLES TINOI PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN OR THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE. FABRIC TO WIRE. za RE MESH SUPPORT FE sICE S VT113 UPPORT FILTER FAI IF IC. CU %0 11 7- BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER CU MATERIAL 8' TO 12' 6' MAX. 2' X 2' WOOD P13STS OR EQUIVALENT CONTRACTUR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED [IN ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN. rE 1_,I� FILTER FABRIC FENCE FILTRATION SYSTEMS 1 Scote- NTS = 11-01 STANDARD DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE 22 ;____=sco.ie- NTS 11-00 EXPANSION JOINT DUMMY JOINT ;d' i4 4.i 44 A A 2' MIN, 10, O.C. 5' O.c' t - W CUT ACP A MIN, OF 2' FROM EDGE OF PLAN GUTTER. FULL DEPTH 1/2' EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAI 5' TO 7' 2% ;Ale UNDISTURBED EARTH OR SECTION. \COMPACTED NATIVE MATERIAL 2' M 7IN6. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED SAW CUT 2"_ BY ENGINEER 2'- 5/8' MINUS CSTC N 0 T Ei 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 300OPSI 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE BROOM FINISHED 3. SIDEWALK THICKNESS SHALL BE 5-1/2'. 4. SIDEWALK THICKNESS AT DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE 6' THICK. 5. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BEPOURED SEPARATELY FROM SIDEWALK 6. CONCRETE SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH CLEAR CURING COMPOUND OR SHALL BE COVERED AND KEPT M01ST FOR 72 HOURS. 7. SAW CUT AND REMOVE ACIP PAVEMENT A MIN. OF 2' FROM GUTTER FACE TO INSURE ADEQUATE COMPACTION OF ACP AND GUTTER SUBGRADE CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR dD� CONCRETE SIDEWALK k J Scatel NTS = 11-00 U-i Lu Lu (s) 0 z z u �7 0 0 Lu z i Lu co LLJ w/ co 0 61 0 T Z Lc) Lu uj c\I > cz C\i C) 0 u IL/ -SHEET- 94B or " 18 0 OVERHEAD UTIL. UNE > C! 0(i LLJ > 0 to 0 T- +A/16- f& C I �!� f ; I 't �*) � h STREET TREES TO BE SELECTED FROM CITY'S APPROVED LIST & ARE TO BE PLANTED ALONG 84TH AVE. W. PER CITY'S REQUIREMENTS 2 30.00 10 tkKb %K K tK �b tpK 7 ob 415400'� (M 0 :�plb CATCH BASIN (C.B.) RIM EL=449. 30.00 q19 '7 -30'- 238TH 5T. 5.W. _q -- - — - — - — -- FND. M.I.C. VISITED: 5-20-05 I L' LOT 11 Wku, C.7 LIGHTING RECESSED CAN LIGHTS OVER GARAGE DOORS (3 EACH BUILDING)- 40W BULB EACH OUTDOOR WALL SCONCE AT ALL ENTRY DOORS- 60W BULB EACH (WALL HUNG 953-11 "DOLAN DESIGNS ANTIQUE BRONZE- 15.S" HIGH X 7.5" WIDE X 7" DEEP) 1=00. "I 70011117-Mum 1b NCE 4b FND. EXIST. REBAR S 88'3651" E2 fl/ NO CAP �'j'k4=51 46 SLIM I M=71 E. END FENCE 0. 4 S. & 0. 4 W. OF NE PROP. COR. ­500 cc LEGENX ...................... ...... ...... FND. EXST. REBAR . ..... .47' 83 NO CAP ...... .... 450.90 ............... ........... ............. ..... '0 sttm, V-1kAj, s'), 88 Amm MqLs ............ . ....... .............. ............ ............. wg�v e�w (�at< ka lIgm/W �Kes)- 4 Z; dos� ............ oOAlel Ave .4' 77, 1A CEDRU5_ Brevifolia G-8' hicjh evercycen- 15' max.- 4' hicjh --- 3 PROV19ED _4J .0 A c; 4 Ir z C) '4' 0 .4 'o uj 4 'A tT 4. LO T- 2 4 I . . L 4 4. A A VINE MAPLE'ACER CIRCINATUM'- 10'- 1 2'hicjh, 3 5tem min. 2 PROVIDED 4 A' . -0 4 ol 4' - . . .'q - - "' - - .. A 41' *:, a . 4 . - q - 4 .. . . .. . A 4- A . 4A !.Z .�A d 4' 44 8 'Al 9%, JN DROUGHT TOLERANT 5HRUE3- RO5MARINU5 Off ICINAU5 (EVERGREEN 5HRU15) GALLON .......... O.C. 3G ........... .......... ........... ............ ?0 .......... .......... ::X. I ....... 46 1. ............. .... I .... * ' . .............. I(T (n ........... .. ............ :.to RHODODENDRON 'ANAH KRU_9CHKE CHEER'-2 P-24' 5pacincj--- ........ .............. ....... ......... BLOCK I ............. ...... I ........ ........... ............... ............... ............... "'o . ............. .... ............ ............. BLDG 2 .............. ............... .......... FRUTLAND ACRES 70 + ............... AZALEA'GAIETY'/ EVERGREEN cjallon 3G" o.c. ............. ............... ............... ............... ....... LAKE BALUNGER ............. 102 ....... ............... 449.70 ............... ............... ............... ............... ................ ....... ............... ............... ............... ................ ..... ........... ........ .............. ........ 5ARC 61 ............... ................ OCOCCA RU5CIfOLIA- 5weet box allon 30 o.c. ........... *U5e COTONEA5TER (ADPRF55U5) cyound cover in 25% of all cyound cover plantin6p. EXIST. REBAR gar _-Z 4� . ....................... 2. .......... .... ;;,;-.:WQQD ON 2507q..ptall plantinc ......... tObe low water U5a6je/ drouc3ht tolerant N 8836'51 W 90.00' [91 a nt5. �D e)65 410 N>> L?-10 8 N (GRAPHIC SCALE FND. EXIST. REBAR W/1-S CAP #22969 —20 0 10 20 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 10 ft. BEW 441 r, RESUB JUN 16 2006 BUILDING DEPARTMENT el-TY OF EDMONDS , 5663 �RONIALD 1 S TIAT E 0 F u-i iz' Q� U-i U111\ U-i _7 _F < (S) looms 0 Lu O� z Q) 5 cc U-j o'o 06 Z Lr) F)uLu—� U rvz 0 u.j C\J C)< > 0 u 0 CL/ co —SHEET— HNSON ING-0-0M -OF 5�9 JUN, BUILDING DEPA7-jp,,-,��n5�qi CITY OF EDMc,%tjf;tS STREET FILE 23GTH 5T. 5.W. Zi N 8 816'51'", W FND. M.I. "SITED: 5-20-of Avw-ss lb %Utmm ff4m %mT) glo. gwms 5AU Im �Jt Ast w 0 %ljf� 6 �awo 0 -30'- LOT 11 2 15 58 23-47 FRONT Y b"o t��V WOOD FENCE FENCE 'P�_ FND. EXIST. REBAR Ao_- �lv"Ull NO CAP NEW POWER PEDESTAL TRELLIS TYP. AT ALL ENTRIES 451.46 '4 4 3.5'WIDE CONC- WALk 4 - - 4 31 Q:) LOT COVERAGE CALC. OVERHEAD SERVICE fib - - -*= == & PAP -KING S L (P LOT AREA= 9253 SQ., FT. UTIL. LINE TO BE REMOVED 715" i��' FIRE AID I ADDRESS A LOCATED IN BUILDING 1- 1917 SQ.. FT. BUILDING 2- 1917 SQ. FT. 00 SIGNAGE 18" MAX. EAVE j 0.0. E Typ� 3834/ 9253= 41.4% 24" MAX. O.H. ALL UNITS TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA D Cm I PROPOSED BUILDING 1 (INCLUDING �ROOF)-2230 SQ. FT. ")V= PROPOSED BUILDING 2, (INCLUDING ROOF)-22$0 SQ. FT. YELLOW "reo qb ILI, PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AREA- J&bOSQ. FT. PAINTED VrA k!rA PROPOSED WALKWAY AREAS- qt0SQ. FT. (25rp X 2) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA-(08�OSQ. FT. CURB 92,53= AREA 00 LAJ W Fl Ln b1b FN EXIST. REBAR 0 1. ILA f4wl 69.0 t�,b'3 NEW 24'WIDE CURB CUT NO CAP 450.9C opm 4 FOR PROPOSED zol TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 611 TRENC i D IN (TD) DRIVEWAY > EXISTING RESIDENCE-1653 Sr) FT NO DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ON SITE - PRIVATE TRASH CANS IN GARAGE WILL BE PUT OUT ON DAY OF TRASH PICK UP ­_.j @ GARA DO RS "do EXISTING GARGE-556 SQ. FT. EXISTING SHED-97.5 SO. FT. ui ""LU9UU031U= A T=D. EXISTING DRIVEWAY-723 SQ. FT. WT -1.2 7 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA-.3030 SQ. FT. (PROPOSED) > z �> 0 LIJ 0 STA ING AR& TOBE HEIGHT QALCULATION Lu > < A 4 L? 4 LO D AT ' TE A- 450 B- 450 0 0 DR WAY.BETWEEN C� 4 4 C- 450 D- 450 6 x 7- Lo o CL V) PPOI OSED V) bUIL bINGS 4 -2 A _&I 0�1' AVG. 450 00 wl 4 MAX. PLATE @ 475.0' z MAX. RIDGE 0 480.0' 0 4 0 SEE CIVIL V) P. 4r 4B, 4C 4 4 -T-4 _TD_ z 4 0 FOR FRONTAGE YELLOW I TD 0 3: PAINTED jw 18" DROP IN 3.1 IMPROVEMENTS 0 CU B I - - ' o'& I EXISTING STRUCTURES 171 0" 8.8% D V L EWAY TO BE REMOVED 0 U- SL PE Ln A PROPOSED S'WIDE CON C. `�ol tE�ksllpb mw toxf, to "va 0 Z-1 SIDEWALK W/ CURB AND GUTTER TIE TO SOUTH SIDE OF 10, 10, 5! _+l 3 PR03ECT (PER EDMONDS w VO MATCH C�C� STANDARD DETAILD (E2. S SOUTH PROPE 4 FIRE AID & E2.13) ON PAGE 4B CURB/GUTTER ADDRESS SIDEWALK SIGNAGE, DATUM CATCH BASIN (C.B.) VK 01" C-1 =AAO 00, F EXIS . T. REE AR m A 113 32.71 TRELLIS TYP. 30,00 4. 450 cs� 0 0 6 15 EXISTIN 0 ------ FIRE o FRONT -30'- HYDRANT 2 0 C� 0 FIND. EXIST. REBAR te) 04 W/LS CAP #22969 938TH 5T. 5-W. ------ ------ FIND. M.I.C. 5V%TJ�05 m I ZAAKCK'll 449.70 81'MAX. EAVE '64" MAX. O.H ;um ENTRIES g) 58 J? 19 . ->, '&o 15 REAR I 1�� BUILDING HEIGHTS CN IOB SITE CHAIN LINK FENCING II r_ �wlv- wi m 6f- e0m000l "vso 56 .'�lj '0(9 7�1 0 uj OF BLDG. 1 & 2 ;("ARAGE SLAB @ 449.50 ZRY SLAB @ 450.67' MAIN FLOOR @ 459.0' UPPER FLOOR @ 468.01 TOP PLATE @ 474.33' RIDGE @ 480.01 ZONE RM 1.5 FRONT= 15' REAR= 15' SIDE=10' HEIGHT= 25' + S'SLOPING 45% MAX. LOT COVERAGE 2 PARKING STALLS PER UNIT i *DATUM- TOP OF C.B. @ SW CORNER OF PROPERTY IN STREET 0 LEGEND: DENOTES FOUND CASED CONCRETE MONUMENT 0 DENOTES SET REBAR WITH LS CAP #8566 0 DENOTES FOUND EXISTING REBAR PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: THE WEST 90.00 FEET OF LOT 12, AND THE EAST 8.47 FEET OF THE WEST 98.47 FEET OF THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 12. BLOCK 1, FRUITLAND ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER ACCORDING TO_Tl�c, PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS Or-- SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASAINGTON.- ELEVA11ONS: REFER TO SURVEY CONTROL DATABASE - POINT ID: 44 NAVD: 88. A STANDARD USC & GS DISK, STAMPED "Q407 1965", SET VERTICALLY IN THE NORTHWEST FACE OF THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION OF THE OFFICE BUI-DING OF MEYRING SURVEYORS AT 23423 HIGHWAY 99, LYNNWOOD. ELEV. = 407.985 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT APPROVED BY PLANNING AREA = 9253 SQ. FT. + REFERENCED: )t Ai-;D refrr -tD qfpyDvee( RIO.S. #7705090196 IN VOL. 5, PG. 140, tA n(A�-' C�oi pt- -Fvr RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON. PLAT OF FRUITLAND ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER IN m pvo v ew c4i f -72 VOL. 10, PG. 47, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. q'A" tf&,U� Y\ex8v\'� - 9 �ec* , FRO-MFLAND 70 LAKE FE-Di' A L L � H ( M I E Ho' (IN , FEET) 1 inch = 10 ft. WEN RESU JUN 16 2006 _----SITE f3UILDING DEPARTM CITY OF EDMON EN DS Co 238TH ST SW SNO KING 5663 RE D 4,'ll 'ECT 0 �RONALD NSON il'-;'T"%TP rl VINCINITY MAP U-J K) z u z 0�w>-v)-ozcn �7 0 O�- LLj z __j LU a/- LLJ o N LLJ ry --) z 0 Lu (\I < r) CV/ (y) 0 co -SHEET- ,4,1729�77",5�9711 U& JUN 16 200- c 11 Ty 0 AER) M I"' N -1 s STREET FILE FND. w., \ASITED: ?T,111�5-20-0! N dd-36'51 " W 24'WIDE DRIVEWAY/ DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE PER C ITY STANDARD SEE DETAIL E2.26 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL E 1.2 ON PAGE 413 PROPOSED S'WIDE CONC. SIDEWALK W/ CURB AND GUTTER (PER EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS (E2.8 & E2.13) ON PAGE 4B C� Fo_1 CLEAN OUT DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 PROPOSED YARD DRAIN 0 z .............. ............... -/ROVIDE ACP TRANSITION FROM PROPOSED ......... ..... Tn SIDEWALK TO EXISTING GRADE TO NORTH LOT 11 NE ........... RAMP AT 12:1 MAX. ....... . C B. HAVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN INFORMATION CATCH RA.CUM lmr'nftM--A-nON EXISTING CB #1, TYPE I RIM ELEV. 449.64 C13 #1, TYPE 1 S. IE 446.59, 1211 PVC RIM ELEV. 451.40 N. & E. IE 446.59, 1211 0 PVC IE 447.05 121, 0 CMP ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: - (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INVERT ELEVATION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF C13 #2, TYPE 2 48" 0 STABLIZATION OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING DISCREPANCIES) PTMI=' 1=11 ACI A TI ITIES SHALL BE STARI 17Fn RY qHITARI P- AID101 Ir' TInKI nf:- DKAD'Q rg I............ ROUTE Lu FILTE SOCK NEW POWER PEDESTAL CL ...... ........... DOWNSPOUT ......... ..... u COLLECTOR @ �0.1.1.1.%'.' ........ ......... .............................. ............... ............ .. 4 . - WOOD FENCE 0.5% MIN. SLOPE ....................... I . �`EXISTING) ................. ... ....... .... . REM VE AND TO CB, TYP. �O .............. ..... .................. ........ .... .......... DIS OSE .......... It OF .. .............. ...... ........ ......... ..... 75 LF 21" 0 CmP. S= _jz "I .... * ... ....... ...... ..... ......... L .... .... .. ............ EXI NG ACP ............. C14 WIDEN 84TH AVE W. ROW AS SHOWN -SHADED AREA(ROAD CONSTRUCTION PER EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL (E2.01.3) ON PAGE 4B) NoTe-'s SEE PLAN BY OTHERS FOR WATER & SEWER SERVICE LINES EWAY ..................................... .... ....... ........ ......... L . j p W. IE 446.67, 12" 0 CMP (CONTROL TEE) INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, N. IE 446.67, 21" 0 CMP (DETENTION PIPE) PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMP'S SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, E. IE 447.07, 15" 0 CPEP AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOILS NE. IE 447.67, 6" 0 PVC (DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR) SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) DAYS FROM CB #3, TYPE IL OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS FROM RIM ELEV. 451.2 MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30. S. & E. IE 447.11, 211, 0 Cmp CB #4, TYPE IL SEE ADDITIONAL ESC DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS ON SHEET 4C RIM ELEV. 451.2 W. IE 447-49, 21 " 0 CMP S. IE 448.49, 6" 0 PVC C13 95, TYPE I RIM ELEV. 451.0 CONSTRUCTION--- SEQUENCE.- W. IE 447.42, 15" 0 CPEP (DETENTION PIPE) N. IE 448-02, 6" 0 PVC (D/S COLLECTOR) 1. SCHEDULE AND ATTEND PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING W/ 451.46 CITY OF EDMONDS BY CALLING (425) 771-0220 CB #4 1 Lj ff.L 'yr-7 2. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR LIMITS OF RIM ELEV. 451.0 CLEARING, LINE AND GRADE OF UTILITIES AND MISC. I IE 448-41 611 0 Pvc ,-=,S 4TRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS. SLOPE 1 450-'37 3. INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION 0.5Y. U.N.0 CONTROL (TESC) MEASURES AS SHOWN ON APPROVED PLANS. 4. SAWCUT AND REMOVE PAVEMENT FROM AREAS TO 46 RECEIVE LANDSCAPE, BUILDING, OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. 5. CLEAR, GRUB AND HAUL, MATERIAL FROM THE SITE AND ,PISPOSE OF AS REQUIRED. Me*WkM Q 6. ROUGH GRADE FOR PROPOSED ROAD CONSTRUCTION, C-tre) �b DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, AND UTILITY ALIGNMENTS. 69 j &,513 NO CAP 7. CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE N I zol 450.90 APPROVED PLANS (DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVING, ETC.) 8. PERFORM FINAL GRADING, CLEANUP, AND APPLICATION OF GROUNDCOVER. 6" TRENCH DRAIN (TD) 9. -REMOVE TESC MEASURES. @ GARACE DOCRS BLOCK I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: IFIRUTLAND ACRES TO THE WEST 90-00 FEET OF LOT 12, AND THE EAST 8.47 FEET OF THE WEST 98-47 FEET OF THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF SAID LAKE BALUINGER LOT 12, BLOCK 1, FRUITLAND ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 110 OF PLATS, 0 PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Li z ALSO KNOWN AS: 23707 84TH AVE. W. EDMONDS, WA ELEVATIONS: EXISTING STRUCTURES REFER TO SURVEY CONTROL DATABASE - POINT ID: 44 TO BE REMOVED NAVD: 88. A STANDARD USC & GS DISK, STAMPED "Q407 1965", SET a VERTICALLY IN THE NORTHWEST FACE OF THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF MEYRING SURVEYORS NOTE: AT 23423 HIGHWAY 99, LYNNWOOD. qo:, TIGHTLINE NEW ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUTS INTO DETENTION ELEV. = 407.985 FEET NOTES: PIPE. IF FOOTING DRAIN IS CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT INSTALLED, RUN FOOTING DRAINS EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHICH CAN (SEPARATE FROM DOWNSPOUT AREA = 9253 SQ. FT. (212 ACRES) NOT BE STORED ON SITE WILL BE DRAINS) INTO STORM DRAIN LINE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE AT A M�r- AFTER AT RARTN .07- Ft"T IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALC. COMMERCIAL FACILITY. 0.5% U.N.0 PRIOR TO LEAVING PROPERTY ON SITE ONLY - *FOOTING DRAINS NOT REQ'D FOR BLDG. 1- 2230 SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION BLDG. 2- 2230 DUST CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE A rFqq- 1RRn REQUIRED DURING PFpi nq P- npv ..... . pr� 49 -7--��Roj �,Tp "OF T P" PER IBC 1807.1 WEATHER. 30.00 .85 SIDEWALKS- 510 EXISTING POTENTIAL "-lb',, 449.75 �so ROU E 14 su PVC 0 1 Fuu I IN DRAIN 1145 UALL 210 LF 313?1 `� 3r "OC9 0 450 TIED IN AFTER CB #2 OF SILT FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXISIING ACP 1-0 COLLECTOR @ ---f �9' \-,")I SEE TI H I TIM;: h1r)TP PER DETAII F qIc SIDEWALK 0 C� 0 EXISTING n N FIRE HYDRANT 238TH 5T. 5.W. FN D. M. 1. MSITED: 5-2C -05 @ RIGHT 1.1 ON PAGE 4B 0 C11 1-1m I Ltl EMS I ING SIDEWALK GRADE AND ALIGNMENT 0.5% MIN. SLOPE TO CB, Typ. -20 GIUPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 (IN FEET) 1 inch =10ft. I TOTAL- 68,30 (.157 ACRES) AVG. EXISTING HEIGHT- 450.5' FINISH SLAB-449.51 SOIL TO BE REMOVED FROM SITE BOTTOM OF FOOTING-448.01 60' X 80' X 1' DEEP= 178 CY v. SOIL DISTURBANCE 63' WIDE X 83' LONG X 2.5' DEEP= 484 CY (AT BUILDING & DRIVEWAY) 24' WIDE _�L_12' LONG X 1' DROP AT ACCESS= 10.7 CY - 7� Tr) T A I -.(-A 0 9, _V� MEN APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION Date: 9�,b M. g lli"� %jv�_ RESUB JUN 16 2006 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Cl'lY OF EDMONDS �Gl_iE5 663 REM".." EMED �R MITECT D. 101,. 0�4 STREET FIL E U-i LLJ U-i z z 0 u :7 0 IN- LLj O�- z Q) = V Co ch Z Lf) LLJ Lu 0j > M C\j U ry CID -SHEET- 4 // or 18 CONTROL STRUCTURE ,r ALUMINUM ROD, )/2" 0 11 RIM ELEV. 451.3 SLOTTED GRATE STOCK HANDLE TO BF '00X I P) RIM ELEV. 451.2 18" MAX. FROM RIM z 1 (POLY COATED) 71 co TYPE MANHOLE STEPS r-0 N OTES: W/ GATE DOWN .1. LOCATED @ 12" O.C. OVERFLOW ELEV. TO PROVIDE DETENTION MIN 88 LF 21 0 CMP MAX. W.S. 1. NEW PIPE SHALL BE 12 0 CORRUGATED METAL AND OIL SEPARATION "i r ELEV. 449.24. PIPE (CMP) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ELEV. 449.24 -ELBOW RESTRICTOR 2. METAL PARTS SHALL BE CORROSION SECONDARY ORIFICE -t- 75 LF 21 0 CIAP TO PIPE SUPPORTS PER DETAIL THIS CB #4, S= .5% RESISTANT. GALVANIZED PIPE PARTS TO HAVE BOLTED W/ EMBED 2 SHEET PER PLAN ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER. IN WALL, 3" X 0.90 GAGE STRAPS, MIN. -..,DETENTION PIPE 0.5% MIN 3. FRAME, GRATE AND RISER SHALL BE OFFSET _.m12" 0 PVC 'x OF 2 SUPPORTS AT S=0.5% SO CLEANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP, AND CMP TO CLIMB DOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER AND MAX. 3' SPACING IE 446.67 IE 447.11-­"*'� PVC COUPLER CLEANOUT GATE. IE 446.67 12" 0 CMP RISER,_"-,".' C-4 RESTRICTOR PLATE CATCH BASIN #3 TYPE 11 W/ A 0.63" ORIFICE SHARP EDGED, SHOP DRILLED CONTROL STRUCTURE, CATCH BASIN #2 TYPE 2 \lr)l I INAE- DF--r)l 11DE-F) rl I �-T �, F)FTE-N I TI nN I D I D F F I E_ \ / A TI n N I v \-/ L_ \-./ I v I I I \1 I I \I L./ \ %_.� \-.1 f %-/ 1­1 . f I . / VOLUME PROVIDED (545 CU. FT.) 40' MIN, R.O.W. wwww5l 11' MIN. It' MIN, (TYP> U u k OD 2% --- bb.- MIN. RADIUS �'-8' QUARRY SPALLS '-12' MIN. DEPTH P PR3VIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ I V E SS GRESS AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, ICITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTR MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. 119 1,2-'\ STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Scatel NTS = 11-01 ELEV. 449.24 RE�OVABLE WATERTIGH1 COUPLING OR FLANGE ORIFICE IE 448.72 NOT TO SCALE . - 91 CMP RISER 4" 0 ELBOW RESTRICTOR PLATE W/ A 1.08" ORIFICE (FRACTIONAL EQUIVALENT 1-W64 SHARP EDGED, SHOP DRILLED ELBOW RESTRICTOR NOT TO SCALE BINDING WIRE OR ri TWINE EXCAVATE TRENCH 8' DEEP WHERE STRAW BALES WILL ML PLACED AND STAKE BALES. C13MPACTED SOIL T� PREVENT PIPING T CROSS SECTION OF A PROPERLY INSTALLED STRAW BALE BARRIER TWO STAKES PER BALE TO MAINTAIN POSITION STRAW BALES AS REQUIRED. VE�_ll I __.. �_-T 1-1 PROPER PLACEMENT OF STRAW BALE BARRIER IN A DRAINAGE WAY CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL, CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN, STRAW BALE DAM -FILTRATION SYSTEMS ScaLei NTS = 11-Cla CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR 5-1/2' I' R V BATTER I'R 0.05 FT/FT �u 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 18' STANDARD 24' ARTERIAL PLACE FILTER AND GRATE. PLACE 7/8' WASHED GRAVEL 3-4 INCHES HIGH AROUND CATCH BASIN TO FILTER WATER, STRAW BALES MAY BE USED IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES (SEE DETAIL E111) UPON APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER REPFESENTATIVE. THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONTRUCTION PERIOD. NOTESi 1. FORMS SHALL BE TRUE TO LINE AND GRADE AND SECURELY STAKED. 2. THRU JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED ADJACENT TO CATCH BASINS. 3. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE EVERY 10 FEET AND DUMMY JOINTS EVERY 5 FEET. 4. THRU JOINTS SHALL HAVE 1/2' TO 5/8' WIDE PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER. 5. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 300OPSI. 6. FINISH SHALL BE LIGHT BROOM, 7. CURB SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH CLEAR CURING COMPOUND OR SHALL BE COVERED AND KEPT MOIST 60 FOR 72 HOURS, 8. ALL SIDEWALKS POURED BEHIND CURB IN DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE 6' THICK OVER 2' [IF CSTC WITH SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY, 62.0% STANDARD -TYPE A' CURB/GUTTFR 5/8' MINUS CSTC CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN, 173"� TEMP, SEDIMENT TRAP FEI� CATCH BASINS ) Scatei NTS = 11-00 ScaLel NTS = 11-00 FILTER FABRIC - SECURED TO 2' X 2' 14 GA, WIRE FABRIC EQUAL 2' X 2' WOOD OR EQUIVALENT 8'- 12' Ile, 1?01 If4l lyc. &4k , r? c4k G, zvr, NOTEi A- IF DRIVEWAY WIDTH EXCEEDS 15', INSTALL A FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT. DRIVEWAY APRON SHALL 33E A MINIMUM OF 6' THICK AND SHALL BE PLACED ON 2' OF 5/8' CSTC AND COMPACTED GRADE, CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 300OPSI 1/2' LIP 17 4 �, I Ap qp )�YOP4;111 14Y � tc ),� kw�. -k 1111FIC-P N JOINT SEE NOTE 'A' ElXPANSION JOINT TYPE 'A' CURB AND GUTTER OR 16' VERTICAL CURB (TO MATCH EXIST. ONLY) EXPANSION JOINT 6' CURB CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED I DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITIONAL DETAIL FOR CURB AND GUTTER OR VERTICAL CURBS SEPARATELY FROM THE SIDEWALK, CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR, u 1 E�M 80 FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CON US ROLLS. USE STAPLES PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN OR TINOI THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE. FABRIC TO WIRE. % 11 c I D :#H-- WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENPE I CU :HEZ TO �UPPORT FILTER FA ic, 7 ff ;I z 1 0 BOTTOM O�F FILTER _�L MATERIAL 8ff TO 12' 6' MAX, 2' X 2' WOOD POSTS OR EQUIVALENT CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE EITHER WORK CAN BEGIN. E �1,1 FILTER FABRIC FENCE FILTRATION SYSTEMS �::) Scatel NTS = 1/_Cllr 2.2� STANDARD DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE Scatel NTS = 11-01 / EXPANSION JOINT DUMMY JOINT PLAN FULL DEPTH 1/2' EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAI MIN. SAW CUT ACP A MIN. OF 2' FROM EDGE OF GUTTER. 5' TO 7' 2% A 4 UNDISTURBED EARTH OR �ECTIEIN \COMPACTED NATIVE MATERIAL 2' N I 7N6. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED SAW CUT 2'- 5/8' MINUS CSTC BY ENGINEER N 0 T Ei IRE su B". 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 300OPSI 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE BROOM FINISHED 3. SIDEWALK THICKNESS SHALL BE 5-1/2'. JUN 16 2006 4. SIDEWALK THICKNESS AT DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE 6' THICK. 5. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED SEPARATELY FROM SIDEWALK BUILDING DEPARTMEt"'T 6. CONCRETE SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH CLEAR CURING COMPOUND CITY OF EDMONDS OR SHALL BE COVERED AND KEPT MOIST FOR 72 HOURS. 7. SAW CUT AND REMOVE ACP PAVEMENT A MIN. [IF 2' FROM GUTTER FACE TO INSURE ADEQUATE COMPACTION OF ACP AND GUTTER SUBGRADE CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCnON WORK PRIOR TO POUR f2.1'�\ CONCRETE SIDEWALK Scatei NTS LLJ UA U-i z 0 u ;7 0 U-i O�- z u 5 co u_j o'o c\j z Ln Lu R/zo Lu (\] Ir )<>I- C) C\j 0 0 rl/ -SHEET- 4B// or 18 I 18.30.050 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL STANDARDS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN. A. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSITATING A CLEARING OR GRADING PERMIT AND ALL UTILITY PROJECTS CONSISTING OF MORE THAN 500 LINEAL FEET OF TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TO PERMANENTLY STABILIZE EXPOSED SOIL RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION. PROJECTS INVOLVING A CRITICAL AREA MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ANY COMBINATION OF THE ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. COMPLIANCE WILL BE DEMONSTRATED THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN APPROVED ESC PLAN. GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING ESC PLANS ARE PROVIDED IN THE MANUAL. THE PLAN MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE, WHENEVER PRACTICAL, LIMITED TO ONE ROUTE. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. 2. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMPS SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). 3. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT DEPOSITION BY APPROPRIATE USE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS, DIKES OR MULCHING, OR BY A COMBINATION OF THESE MEASURES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. 4. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - MAINTENANCE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER TO ENSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. 5. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - OTHER BMPS. AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED RUNOFF SHALL BE APPLIED. 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: A. EROSION CONTROL FOR EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS; B. THE PLACEMENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES; C. TRENCH DEWATERING SYSTEMS (MUST DISCHARGE INTO SEDIMENT TRAPS, SEDIMENT PONDS, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS); D. TRACKING AND SPILLING OF MATERIALS ON STREETS DUE TO HAULING; E. DAILY CLEANUP AND STREET MAINTENANCE. 7. ADDITIONAL ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGER DEVELOPMENTS. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDES LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OF GREATER THAN, OR EQUAL TO, ONE ACRE IN ADDITION TO MEETING THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ABOVE SHALL COMPLY WITH ESC REQUIREMENTS LISTED BELOW. 8. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - DELINEATE CLEARING AND EASEMENT LIMITS. IN THE FIELD, MARK CLEARING LIMITS AND/OR ANY EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, SENSITIVE/CRITICAL AREAS AND THE BUFFERS, TREES AND DRAINAGE COURSES. 9. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - SEDIMENT TRAPPING. PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE, STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL PASS THROUGH A SEDIMENT POND OR SEDIMENT TRAP, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. SEDIMENT PONDS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, AND OTHER BMPS INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT ON -SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN GRADING. THESE BMPS SHALL BE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TAKE PLACE. EARTHEN STRUCTURES, SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. 10. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CUT AND FILL SLOPES. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION. IN ADDITION, SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESC REQUIREMENT NO. 2. 11. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONTROLLING OFF -SITE EROSION. PROPERTIES AND WATER WAYS DOWNSTREAM FROM DEVELOPMENT SITES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO INCREASES IN THE VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW RATE OF STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. 12. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS. ALL TEMPORARY ON -SITE CONVEYANCE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION FROM THE EXPECTED VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM A TWO-YEAR, 24-HOUR FREQUENCY STORM FOR THE DEVELOPED CONDITION. STABILIZATION ADEQUATE TO PREVENT EROSION OF OUTLETS, ADJACENT STREAM BANKS, SLOPES AND DOWNSTREAM REACHES SHALL BE PR,OVIDED AT THE OUTLETS OF ALL CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. 13. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION: ALL 'STORM DRAIN INLETS MADE OFERABLE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED SO THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL NOT ENTER THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WITHOUT FIRST BEING FILTERED OR OTHERWISE TREATED TO 'REMOVE SEDIMENT. 14. ESC REQUIREMENT - REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMPS. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMPS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERM AN EN TLY STABILIZED. 15. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES. DEWATERING SYSTEMS SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT POND. 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION SITES. ALL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENTTHAT OCCUR ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORm WATp. 17. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - FINANCIAL LIABILITY. PERFORMANCE BONDING, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTSTO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. [ORD. 3013 § 1, 1995]. I "I, Mqe�"­ %, 0 ONO Fa UE S_ u B JUN 16 2006 BUILDING DEPAn'rMENT CITY OF EDMONDS /11TIZ227 �Y/o �, me-14 Lu uj F (n z z u Zi I I I 1:44��vh-,ozrAj 77 0 G) O�— Ld (J.-i U u_j o 0 Z Lf) u U-1 , :D.0 u_j N IV 0 G) CL/ -SHEET- 4C -OF ELEVATIONS: *DATUM- TOP OF C.B. @ SW CORNER OF REFER TO SURVEY CONTROL DATABASE - POINT ID: 44 surface el 450.D+ PROPERTY IN STREET NAVD: 88. A STANDARD USC & GS DISK, STAMPED "Q407 1965", SET VERTICALLY IN THE NORTHWEST FACE OF THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF MEYRING SURVEYORS 77 21 detention LEGEND: AT 23423 HIGHWAY 99, LYNNWOOD. i. e. 446.86 rV1 DENOTES FOUND CASED CONCRETE MONUMENT llz� ELEV. = 407.985 FEET NOTE TO EARnWORK CONTRACTOR: 0 DENOTES SET REBAR WITH LS CAP #8566 CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT DO NOT DAMAGE SIDE SEWER, IT IS To BE REUSED FOR TIRS pROjECTG: 6 sch 40 pyc 0 DENOTES FOUND EXISTING REBAR AREA = 9253 SQ. FT. CAREFULLy EXCAVATE AROUND IT AM CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800424-5555. TBERE IS A GAS LINE REFERENCED: IN VICMITY OF SIDE SEWERNOTE TO EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR: side sewer pipe i.e.446.14 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: R.O.S. #7705090196 IN VOL. 5, PG. 140, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. @ crossing THE WEST 90.00 FEET OF LOT 12, AND THE EAST 8.47 FEET OF THE WEST 98.47 FEET OF THE NORTH 30.00 FEET OF SAID PLAT OF FRUITLAND ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER IN Cross Section LOT 12, BLOCK 1, FRUITLAND ACRES TO LAKE BALLINGER OF PLATS, VOL. 10, PG. 47, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 WASHINGTON. Sewer Crossing PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Detention Pipe 15' 4' CB Rim - 116' 23.47' @ 449.3 1:p ie @ 447.05 %K WOOD PENCE + LOT 11 <0 FND. EXIST. REBAR + + fV 30.00 S 88036'51" E 98.47' 0 NO CAP CB #3 TRELLISTYP. AT ALL ENTRIES -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 451-46 4 A .4 �3.5'WIDE CONC klo (2) 8-5'X 16. LOT COVERAGE CALC OVERHEAD SERVICE N + -0 tK< PARKING S LLS C4 LOT AREA= 9253 SQ. FT. UTIL. LINE ... ... LOCATED IN 0 6 BUILDING 1- 1917 SQ. FT. San manhole@ 440.6 0 18" MAX. EAVE *0 '1911 + I � TYP co BUILDING 2- 1917 SQ. FT. 3834/ 9253= 41,47. Rim 453.44 ... 24" MAX. O.H. -0 ALL UNITS measure down 8.75' service lines J� LO C11 TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA invert @ 444.69 N. ... 9 der Clete ntion Rlkn a 1�1 co 0) PROPOSED BUILDING 1 (INCLUDING ROOF)-2205 SQ. FT, PROPOSED BUILDING 2 (INCLUDING 11700F�-9905 SQ Prr K 6( �P:o P tR + O.-Il r) a, `11 move ex :.-:WM .:WM wm to NEW 24'WIDE CURB CUT prop line::., ... ri wo te - FOR PROPOSED P ka DRIVEWAY 8)?, 6ver. ,gg .4 A 4 A 44 �6.80 4 A' 4 4 to > 44!o , '4 Se �0 4 4.' 4,A .4 C 4 I 4 - :.:" 1b I ... e. .. ... - ... - � - -$ - -:.-, .,A 446 1 - - - 1? -- 4. 1 - 44 4 4 e - 4 .7.0 .4 4 A 1 43) 1., 46.9 6 0 6.56 E. 44 1 A Z co �A A. 4.. 4, 14 E- Z cc bk PROPOSED 6'WIDE CONC. SIDEWALK W/ CURB AND GUTTER TIE IN TO ON SOUTH F4 71 (esti SIDE OF PROJECT Exist 6" Son S' 11 C/j t U 1b) I assumed slope of -- -------------- --- ... inv 2 % ss -442.15 DATUM CATCH BASIN >.* (C.B1,) RIM EL.=449. C> i.e=446.63 C6, . 00 t 30.00 'j V19 191 �0 NAT, Z C\2 CQ San Manholes @ 238th Rim 447,55 -30'- measure down 8' invert 439.55 co 02 APPROVED IC VIEW WATER DISTRICT P,-,-T te I By lChecked 2 3 8T H 5T. 5. W. FND. M.I.C. co VISITED: 5-20-05 Revision FX6. EXIST. RI W,/1-S CAP �U22 732,.71 30' 4' FND. EXIST. REBAR W/LS CAP` #22969 )I< 449.70 F- 8" MAX. EAVE 4" MAX. O.H. XIT A' -A q. 3.5'WI E CONC. WALK TRELLIS TYP- T ALL ENTRIES WOOD ENCE X 449.7b N 88*36'51" W 90,00' + 1Z c*1 + 116' '00, /0 4,11 450.02 6 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AREA-1280 SQ. FT. (A,,011 PROPOSED WALKWAY AREAS-514 SQ, FT. (257 X 2) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA-6204 SQ. FT. 6204/ 9253= 67% 69 F N76AP EXIST. REBAR '\'V88-36'51`W'r,- X 450.9C TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS ARE 0 EXISTING RESIDENCE-1653 SQ. FT. EXISTING GARGE-556 SQ. FT. EXISTING SHED-97.5 SQ. FT. EXISTING DRIVEWAY-723 SQ. FT. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA-3030 SQ. FT. 6204 (PROPOSED) - 3030 (EXISTING)= 3174 SQ. FT. HEIGHT CALCULATIO A- 450 B- 450 + C- 450 D- 45 AVG. 450 MAX. PLATE 0 475.0' Z MAX. RIDGE @ 480.0' 29.99' P. -0 C� EXISTING STRUCTURES LO SQ co TO BE REMOVED + BUILDING HEIGHTS 150 ON OF BLDG. 1 & 2 GARAGE SLAB @ 449.33' ENTRY SLAB @ 450.67' MAIN FLOOR @ 459.0' UPPER FLOOR @ 468.0' TOP PLATE @ 474.33' RIDGE @ 480.01 'LES) L 0 �C� b K, I FROM � 7 L A H 0 A �197� L A wn E L"E") A L L � HU"IE R ------------------------------------- ---------------- SCALE: III" I 01=0" soff 77-7-1 s Al -20 0 10 20 40 (IN FEET) 1 inch - 10 ft. OLYMP- IC VIEW WATE Q11\, AND SEWER,%, D IST-QLI,,,,ICT Appvd Larry Steward drawn by Checked by 1$$=101 - Approved By Scale er s z5e LARRY E. STEWARD PE 24738 SE NIRRORMONT DRIVE ISSAQUAH, WASH 98027 PHONE 425-392-6111 CELL 425-765-9962 FAX 425-392-6111 email lesteward @ hotmail.com CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 BUILDING BUILDING f CLEANOUT WITH 45' BEND AND CAP U.1 Z Z 0 W R a- 2 GENERAL CLEANOU V) CLEANOUT (WYE W/ CAP & LAMPHOLE COVER) NOT TO EXCEED 100' BETWEEN CLEANOUTS 12" Maximum �7- LAMPHOLE COVER W - W TO MATCH EXISTING 12" Maximum 1L W GRADE 0 W Z [L Z! mi-I Depth 1=2 VC 1 In mum WATER TIGHT CAP 2' Under SL VE RISER 4"OR 6" SLEEVE Landscaping SIDE SEWER RISER 18' Under WYE AND Driveways 45* BEND GENERAL CLEANOUT DETAIL 6" DISTRICT STUB 4" OR 6" SIDE SEWER 12" Maximum CLEANOUT DETAIL AT RUEWATER TIGH- 1 2 " P� IS EE R SL R 'A IS r Wyl 74 1 r FW " E 6 D ASPHALT SURFACE PROPERTY LINE & BUILDING 0 - LAMPHOLE COVER 6" RISER-/ (OLYMPIC FOUNDRY CO 712" PVC SLEEVE MODEL 5931 OR EQUAL) PVC - PVC CAP NOTE: + SIDE SEWER JOINTS SHALL BE TYPICAL CI FANnt IT GASKETED UNDER ASPHALT SEWER CLEANOUT DETAILS NTS 1APIC OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT R VISIONS STANDARD DETAIL -S(?wer C(eanout Detai( W DATE SCALE DWO NO 10/23/02 nts S-2 SIDE SBWR SPECIFICA71ONS 1. Al private side sewer constmcdon requires a permit and the paymert of a fee. 7he permit application will require the complete legal description� address, ard the dimensions of the property to be served. 2. Al construiction in thiia public Rght-cf-Way must be done by a licensed saver conbacbor. 3. All house plurnbing outlets must be connected to the sanitary sm-er. 4. No downspout or storni dranage may be connected to the sanitary smer. 5. materiad: Pipe - Casket jointed PVC - SDR 35 or ASTIVI D-3034 - Gasket jointed Dictile Iron Class 50 Fittings - Gasketed PVC ASTIVI D-3034 - Ducti I e Iron K AVNA C 153 Al fitJj ngs MLIS7 be gasketed 6. Mnimum slope: 4-indi diameter lope - 2% (1/4 inch fdl per foot) 6-i rich diameter pipe - 1% Mnimum grade IVlaximum slope: All pipe 500/o 7. Pipes shall be laid in straight line between berids. Male all change in line or grade with less than or equal to 45 degrees. 8. Increases in pipe size shall be made by manufacturied fittinigs. 9. Pipe shall be bedded from undisturbed trench wall to undisturbed trench wall on each side of the pipe and from 2 inches below to 2 inches above the Ope with pea gravel or dean free draining sand. 10. The side sewer shall be inspected by Dstrict staff prior to backfillirx g. The side seweir shall be plugged and filled with water prior tx) calling for testing and pressure tested in the presence of the Dstrict Inspector. Leakage rate shall not exceed 0.31 gal/hour for 4-inch pipe and 0.47 gal/hour for 6-inch pilp; per 100 feet of pipe. ii. SeAw lines shall have a District approved cleanout at every other 45 degrees of bend, at least every 100 feet� or at every increase in pipe size. 12. A 6-inch side sewer will be aillawed to serve a n-admum of four (4) single-family resideres. 13. A 4-inch side sewer will be dlowed to serve only one (1) single-farnily residence. 14. Parallel water "sewer lines shall be separated by 10 feet horizontally v*e-ever possible. \Aker and sewer lines shall have a vertical separation of 18 inches if a crossing is reoessary. is. Nght-cf-Way restoration shall equal or emeed the original conclition. 16. Trench baddill urder paved area shall be 5/8-inch minus crushed surfadng top course; full trench, de 12-inch lifts. FCP", 681*60N Win. OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL Side Sewe:r Specifications DATE I SCALE I DWO NO. S_1 10/23/02 nts WATER AND SEWER SITE PLAN PATRICK ARCHER 13215 -8TH AVE N.W. SEATTLE,WASH 98177 PHONE 206-235-6783 RESUB JUL 27 2006 BUILDING DE94RiUENT CITy or- EDMONDS SHEET OF r-1 04,�) C:�,rl 11 IN