239 4TH AVE S (3)FIRE PREVENTION
INSPECTION REPORT
Serving Brier, Eamonas, and 12425 Meridian Ave S
SMOH ISH 0 EDMONDS
Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 0 BRIER
FI Phone (425) 551-1200 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
DISTT www.FireDistrict].org Fax (425) 551-1272 [1 UNINCORPORATED
239 4 th Avenue S 98020
e- FrQUEafY
nnU
STAJI?�d SHIFT
LOCATION:
Olympic Vista Condos
Mar
2017
BUSINESS NAME:
PHONE:
SCHEDULED
DATE DUE
MAILING
4;e:e ZU;e
LIFIR 0
ADDRESS:
Waits, Fred
"BUSINESS OWNER:
HOME PHONE:
Buelow, Dave
425775215�1/
EMERGENCY-1:
HOMEPHON
CURRENT
KEY ACCESS-2:
_C..YES
HOME PHONE:
CITY
NO
EMAII-4
BUSINESS
LICENSE
PERSON CONTACTED: VA ir tl�
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTOR, . A.
-IRE
3,,L.
5'
SYSTEMS* *!
3 11 it] r-p% it 114 r-r! 11 M 17 ]XIM
Emerald Tire
Fire Sprinkler Specialists
11021 Cramer Rd. KPN, -Gig Harbor, WA98329
Office (253) 857-2056 - Fax (253) 857-2312 - Local 699 Contractor
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
(One System per Report)
2-3� 4-�N) AvR, S - )'C' ' . C4,Aa
Occupancy Addr6ss: -),VVA- I enboccupa , y N e:
Responsible Person: Phone mmb'�._ (�D
Building Owner: Phone Number:
Date of Inspection: Type of Inspection: Quarterly [I Annual Other E]
Testers Name (Please Print): �—nS5 WA State FSCC#
DRY SYSTEM/PRE-ACTION SYSTEM:
1 Trip test (dry trip or full flow) conducted: ......................................... ....... Yes [] No F-1
System tripped in seconds.
2. All flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells t : ..................... Yes E] No E] N/A E]
3. Alarm bell operates: ..................................... .................... ...... .......... Yes EJ No El N/A El
e
rvis -0-r-y 5w. tc
he
s a
..n.d
a
a
-rm b
.e
..I.I.s
t
ed
4. Flow tests conducted: ................ ......... ........................ .......... . YesE] No E]
Flow pressure: _psi ch drain? .............. .. . . Yes E] Noo
.... ....................
5. Systems inspected and lubric ed: ........................................ ... Yes[:] No E] N/A F]
6. Air compressor refills s em in 30 minutes: ........... .................................. Yes E] No El
7. System drained afid restored to normal operation: ..................................... Yeso Noo
8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge system? ..... YesEl NoE] N/AE1
ET �SYSTE /AWI-FRff-ZE SYS-TEM: Tested at
I . E'rip test conducted: ................................... ..... Yesll� No E]
Static pressure: )nq�- psi Flow I i i ..... Yesq No E-] N/A E]
2. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested: ..................... Yest� No E] N/A F1
3. Alarm bell operates: .............................................................................. Yesl� No Ej N/A [-I
4. Systems inspected and lubricated: .............. ..................................... YesX No F-1
5. Pressure regulating valves tested: ........................................................... Yes E] No E] N/Aq
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTNS fcontinued)
General:
1 Central Station Monitoring? ...................................... Ye�Z No E]
Monitoring company name
2. Location of Sprinklers
100% ......... x Parking ......... E] Basement ......... Hallways ......... Other ........
3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed ....................................... Yes Non
4. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old ............................................................. Ye Non
5. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable .................................................................... Ye Non
6. Spare sprinkler heads are available .............. i .................................................. Yes)�r- Non
C —
7. Systems left in service .................................................................................. Yes/ Non
8. Valves are sealed or supervised ...................................................................... Yekj Non
9. Signs are provided on valves ......................................................................... No[]-
10. City static water pressure psi.
Problems Found:
Corrections Made:
SIGNATURE OF TESTER:
Date Corrected: - Corrected By:
AGENCY. Emerald Fire PHONE: 253-857,-,2056
MAILINGADDRESS: 11021 Cramer Road KPN, Gig Harbor, WA98329
I &Q-) a's
ui� Emerald
Fire Spfinkler Spccialist5,
SYSTEM CORRECTION R.EPORT
Date — / I � FPB Fi'le #
System Type:
Ajarm �s prinkler Rangehood Standpipe Fire Escape Other
Name of (,"�"a5Contact Person-
J;C� #�' m-4z - '5. E-�� / - 1 �5 I WA —LA--
ddfess: c� �0 2-Upho
Have your service provider complete section below and return to this offlce within 7d2ys of
completion:
Dare Corrections Made:
A -
Company Making Corrections: Emerald Fire LLC
Company Contact Person: Shane Foss Phone: 253-857-2056
Corrections Made: n r
J 1021 Cramer Rd. KP.lq Gig Harbor, WA 98329 - Office (2531657-2066 Fax (253) 85-1-2312 Local 699 ContractQr
EWRALDFm, LLC
rwe SpfihHa Spe&t&&
11021 Cma- Road KPN, CAg Hw*, Wasbingola.98329
Ph (253) 857-2056 - Fax (253) 857-2312
SYSTEM CORRECTION REPORT
Date — - " I 1� F?B File#
System Type:
Alarm prinider _Rangehood Fire Escape Other
___§tandpipe
'V,- I �k co'&O�
Name of Facility-. Contact Person-
9AS1 V4 -9 Vane:
Addreb:
Have your service I provider complete section below and return to this oMce Witbin 7 days of
completion,
Date Correctiow Made:
Company-MaldingCorrections: Emera-ld Fire
Company Coatact Person. � � a K.(.� FQY� -Phone: 253-857-2056
Corrections Made:
N't co
SiSrudure of TeqW.cian
/ 40 () 5 a ),
Emerald Tire
Fire Spfinkler Specialists
SYSTEM CORRECTION REPORT
Date— FPB File #
System Type:
Alarm Spninkler Rangehood Standpipe Fire Esc4pe Other
f F261itv:b\�401)t—Q 40, Contact Person-
L ame 0
WA pho
df_e's�s�
Have your service provider compfete section below and return to this office within 7 days or
completion:
Date Corrections Made: 7i 71 b
J_
Company Making Corrections: Emerald Fire LLC
Company Contact Person: Shane Foss Phone: 253-857-2056
Corrections Made: r f
I 1021 Cramer Rd. KPIN -Gig Harbor, WA98329 - Office (253) 857-2056 - Fax (2531857-2312 -Local 699 contractor
Emerald Pire
Fire Spfinkler Specialiks
11021 Cramer Rd. KPN - Gig Harbor, WA 98329
Office (253) 857-2056 - Fax (253) 857-2312 - Local 699 Contractor
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
(One System per Report)
Add WZ01 cc u p a r)cy N, A M
3?c A n -1:'� Y) r e/s is V
Responsible Person: P h o n e X+M 7 —
be
Building Owner: .1 1 Phone Number:
Date of Inspection: Type of Inspection: Quarterly Annu��10ther E]
Testers Name (Please Print): WA State FSCC#
1. -Tr4ztest (dry trip or full flow) conducted: .................................................. Yes E] No F-1
System'�t�ped in seconds.
2. All flow switche pervisory switches and alarm bells tested: ..................... Yeso Noo WAR
pery y swit
i"" ch s a 'a r
3. Alarm bell operates:.. _N� .......................................... ......... ..... ..... Yes R No EJ N/A El
. ..... ....
4. Flow tests conducted: ....... ... . ............. I ....................... . .. ..... .. Yes No F1
Flow pressure: _ si inch drain? ................ .. . .. ... .. Yes No E]
-1 No El N/A El
5. Systems inspected and lubricated: ............ .................... .. . . ....... ..... Yes E
6. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes: ........... ** ................................... Yes n Non
7. System drained and restored to normal operation: ........... * ......................... Yes F] No E]
8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge system? ..... Yes 11 No 0 N/A El
__�7 W E— -' '-'T--
ET SYSTEM/ 14+14-1496Z&&�!M.ested at
11 r st co sfj' No 7
r nducted: ...................................... ................. Ye,
Static pressure: psi Flow pressure: psi 2 inch drain? ....... YesE] No;��N/AE]
2. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested: ..................... Yes�T No r-1 N/A f-1
3. Alarm bell operates: ............................................................................. YeeNo F-1 N/A F-�
0-"
4. Systems inspected and lubricated: .......................................................... Yet6"ON o E-71
5. Pressure regulating valves tested: ........................................................... Yes Ej No [] N/A
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (continued)
General:
I Central Station Monitoring? .........
...... ......... . ............... YestrNo F-1
Monitoring company name
C
2. Location o 1prin " rs
100% .... .. Parking ......... F� Basement ......... F� Hallways ......... Other ........ EJ
3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed ....................................... yeseNo 0
4, Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old ............................................................. Ye.�No D
5, Sprinkler coverage is acceptable .................................................................... Ye5�f' No F-1
6. Spare sprinkler heads are available ................................................................. Yewr!T' No R
7. Systems left in service .................................................................................. Yuef � No R
8. Valves are sealed or supervised ...................................................................... Yesfj' No F�
9. Signs are provided on valves ......................................................................... Yes�fnNo F-1
10. City static water pressure—] psi.
Problems Found:
Corrections Made: Date Corrected: Corrected By;
SIGNATURE OF TESTER:
AGENCY: Emerald Fire PHONE: 253357-2056
MAILINGADDRESS: 11021 Cramer Road KPN, Gig Harbor, WA 98329
FIRE PREVENTION
'Serving Brier, Edmonds, an.d
12425 Meridian Ave S
I N� FICTION REPORT
-SNOHOMISH CO.
IDM NDS
FIREMountlake
Terrace
Everett, WA 98208
M
El BRIER
Phone (425) 551-1200
El MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
ST
Rf*4wh
El UNINCORPORATED
www.FireDistrictl.org
Fax (425) 551-1272
I'-
FREQUENCY
STATION& SHIFT
LOCATION:
239 A th Avenue S 2M20
Atinual
17-D
BUSINESS NAME:
Oyrnpk; Vista Corkdm
PHONE:
SCHEDULED Mar 2014
DATE DUE
MAILING
UFIRV2 202
ADDRESS:
BUSINESS OWNER:
(�mlm RrLcd-.rimry ff-Ifil
HOME PHONE:
EMERGENCY-1:
Buclaw, Da-,,c
HOME PHONE: 42-577 621 f 1
"CURRENT
KEY ACCESS-2:
HOME PHONE:
CITY YES NO
EMAIL:
BUSINESS
LICENSE
PERSON CON TACTED:
fA6
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTOR:
Z
05-
F I R E S'fS I iz ivi
A�J�
ICU Lk Box
C<, —
r� C4, - Il ILI -
�,, va,
HAZARD§ FOUND AND LOCATIbNS / COMMUNICAfIONS
1
1
/yi-) -/./ ,,v4
2 9, -e 1./
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1 st RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
2nd RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
EXTENSION
GRANTED TO:
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
VIOLATIONS
CITED:
JCPERSONT
ONTAC ED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
1
IINSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
1 15
VIOLATIONS
1 5
PRE -CITATION
LETTER SENT
CITATION ISSUED
NUMBER:
4
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION:
3
7
3
7
RETURN RECEIPT
RECEIVED
6
.4
.8
4
.8
DATE:
DISPOSITION:
�LETTER NEEDED E] YES [I NO
LETTER NEEDED [] YES NO
8
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
i
Emerald Tire
Fire Spfinkler Specialists
11021 Cramer Rd. KPN - Gig Harbor, WA 98329
Office (253) 857-2056 - Fax (253) 857-2312 - Local 699 Contractor
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
(One System per Report) -0- -'7zz_S-Zz
-ici
a)
(YC,CL?Panry Addrlsrr-- 5- F�A04��WA_%Wocccup\ayc fa) C: (�Owv.
'i
5 �33 ?--8-29
Responsible Person: Phone N 1 hp
Building Owner: Phone Number:
Date of Inspection:.,�!�&I-s-�SIA)i�,k�i-) Type of Inspection: Quarterly F-1 Annual,21' Other n
Testers Name (Please Print): 56)7'iZ'� FQ 55 WA State FSCC# 57 C(
-DRY SYSTEM/PRE-ACTION SYSTEM:
Trip test (dry trip or full flow) conducted: .................................................. Yes E] No F-1
SY � tripped in seconds.
2. All flow swNbes, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested: ..................... Yes El No [] N/A 0
3. Alarm bell operatO�� ........................................................................ Yes 0 No [-] N/A []
4.
Flow tests conducted: ......... :�
Flow pressure:
...................... Yes No E]
s -inch drain? ........... ... ...... ... ............ Yes No
5.
Systems inspected and lubricated: ............ .................. .
... ... ... . .......
Yes E]
No r-1 N/A R
6.
Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes: .......... ............. ...................
Yes E]
No E]
7.
System drained and restored to normal operation* ........
Yes R
No E-]
8.
Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action an del system? .....
YesR
NoE] N/AE]
11LET
91
S7YST�JANTI-FREEZE SYSTEM: Tested at
1 .
Trip test conducted . .................................... ........ ................... .
Static Flow si 2 inch drain?
YeZ
Yes
No[]
pressure: psi pressure: .......
E]
Np4E�' N/A E]
2.
Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested: .....................
Yes,�T
NoE] N/AF�
3. Alarm bell operates: ............................................................................. Ye95 No R N/A F-�
4. Systems inspected and lubricated: .......................................................... Ye.,sj?'N 0 0
5. Pressure regulating valves tested: ............................................................ YesE] NoR N/411f?
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (continued)
General:
1 Central Station Monitoring? .......................................................................... Yes,�N o El
Monitoring company name t bn r) C—,
2. Location of Sprinklers
100% ........ Basement ......... F-1 Hallways ......... n Other ........
Parking .........
3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed ....................................... Ye,� No
4, Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old ............................................................. Ye sf �t-N o n
5. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable .................................................................... Yek� No El
6. Spare sprinkler heads are available ................................................................. Yes -El' No El
7. Systems left in servi ce .................................................................................. Yeeff'- No F-1
8. Valves are sealed or supervised ...................................................................... Ye5j;-f' No Ej
9. Signs are provided on valves .......................................................................... Ye5a' No E]
10. City static water pressure 0� psi.
Problems Found: " 0,1ye', cOW4e—, OY-J�.-
0 V o .5 )tg�n -�dq,5
a
Y) Ze-' 4- -� )r) fat 5e—e C�Iqzcv�- V(A)VP
Corrections Made: Date Corrected: Corrected By:
SIGNATURE OF TESTER: -- V. 'I z D
AGENCY: Emerald Fire PHONE: 253-857-2056
MAILING ADDRESS: 11021 Cramer Road KPN, Gig Harbor. WA 98329
17 .
EMERALDFiu, LLC
Fire Sprinkler Specialists
H 021 Cramer Road KPN, Gig Harbor, Washington 98329
Ph (253) 857-2056 — Fax (253) 857-2312
SYSTEM CORRECTION REPORT
Date FPB File #
System Type:
Alarm '�,Spnnkler Rangehood Standpipe Fire Escape Other
coy)��s
Name of Facilitv: ontact Person. -
Address: P h o n e:
WA - �0210
Have your service provider complete section below and return to this office within 7 days of
completion: -1 —�_ Aj
Date Corrections Made:
Company 1� laking Corrections:
5 �twj;�
Company Contact Person: t() 5S Phone:
Corrections Made:
ture of Technician"
Emerald Pire
Fire Spfinkler Specialists
11021 Cramer Rd. KPN - Gig HarborWA 98329
Office (253) 857-2056 - Fax (253) 857-2312 - Local 699 Contractor
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
(One System per Report)
ic- Vlstk Cwn4s
IN� -C V010200c?u�A� Name:
Occupancy Adc ress:
Responsible Person:
- Phone Number:
Building Owner: Phone Number:
Date of Inspection: Type of Inspection: Quarterly E] Annual)e Other E]
t )13
Testers Name (Please Print): FZ0% WA State FSCC# 12-&aO
DRY SYSTEM/PRE-ACTION SYSTEM:
1. Trip test (dry trip or full flow) conducted: .................................................. Y No Ej
System tripped in seconds.
2. All flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells testeo�,. .................... Yes EEJ No E] N/A E]
3. Alarm bell operates: ......................................... ................................... Yes E] No E] N/A E]
4. Flow tests. conducted: ........................ ................................................ Yes El NoF
Flow pressure: Dsi� -inch drain? ........................................ Yes [-] NoF
5. Systems inspected and
>45t-i-cated ................................ . ........ ..... ....... Yes E] No E] N/A F
6. Air compre fills system in 30 minutes: .............................................. Yes No E]
s ef
7. Sy drained and restored to normal operation: ..................................... . Yes E] No El
o" Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge system? ..... Yes E] No E] N/A El
WET SYSTEM/ANTI-FREEZE SYSTEM: Tested at
Trip test conducted: ..............................................................................
YesX No F-1
Staticpressure: psi Flow pressure:--ACO psi 2 inch drain? .......
Yes 0
No E]
N/A E]
2.
Flow switches, supervisory switches.and alarm bells tested: .....................
Yes6
No E]
N/A E]
3.
Alarm bell operates: ..............................................................................
Yeso
No 0
N/A 0
4.
Systems inspected and lubricated: ..........................................................
Ye se
No E]
5.
Pressure regulating valves tested: ...........................................................
Yes 0
No [-]
N/&2r
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (continued)
General:
I
Central Station Monitoring? ........................... I ................................................
YeXs
No
Monitoring company name 'F!P-r
2.
Location of Sprinklers
100% ....... / Parking ......... E] Basement ......... E] Hallways ......... E] Other ........ 0
3.
Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed .......................................
YesZ'
No E]
4.
Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old .............................................................
YeZ
No Ej
5.
Sprinkler coverage is acceptable .................................................. .....................
Yeo'
No E]
6.
Spare sprinkler heads are available .................................................................
Yes.��
No
7.
Systems left in service ...................................................................................
Y4R<
No r-1
8.
Valves are sealed or supervised ......................................................................
Yese
No F
9.
10.
Signs are provided on valves ..... I ....................................................................
City static water pressure psi.
YeXs
No F-1
Problem . sFound: Iq 04 t�
Corrections Made: Date Corrected: Corrected By:
SIGNATURE OF TESTER:
AGENCY: Emerald Fire PHONE: 253-857-2056
MAILINGADDRESS: 11021 Cramer Road KPN, Gig Harbor, WA98329
FIRE PREVENTION
Serving Briet: Edmonds
12425 Meridian Ave S
INSPECTION REPORT
SNOHOMISH CO.
DEDMONDS
FIRE� Mountlake Terraceand
-7
Everett, WA 98208
0 BRIER
DISImy-ft' W_ the Town of Woodway
j7
1211 I
Phone (425) 551-1200
OWOODWAY
0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
www.FireDistrictl.org
Fax (425) 551-1272
0 UNINCORPORATED
,'- FREQUENCY
STATION & SHIFT*'�
LOCATION: 239 4th Avenue S
365
17 C
I
BUSINESS NAME: Olympic Vista Condos
PHONE:
SCHEDULED
DATE DUE 0 0-Y01/13
MAILING
UFIR o 422 3202
ADDRESS:
BUSINESS OWNER: Lambert, Fred #201
HOME PHONE: 4257767297
EMERGENCY-1: Watson, Martly #302
HOME PHONE: 4256723794
"—C—URRENT
KEY ACCESS-2:
HOME PHONE:
CITY YES NO
BUSINESS
LICENSE
PERSON CONTACTED:
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTOR:
FIRE FA 12/11 AS 12111 FD Lkbx
FEZ-1/3
SYSTEMS:
(nZ_)
ANNUAL
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1 st RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
2nd RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
EXTENSION
GRANTED TO:
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
VIOLATIONS
CITED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
1
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
1 5
VIOLATIONS
1 5
PRE -CITATION
LETTER SENT
CITATION ISSUED
NUMBER:
4
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTIOW
5
3
7
3
7
RETURN RECEIPT
RECEIVED
6
4
18
4
.8
DATE:
DISPOSITION:
7
\1 LETTER NEEDED F] YES NO
LETTER NEEDED C] YES [I NO
8
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
Emerald Tire
Fire Sprinkler Specialists
11021 Cramer Rd. KPN - Gig Harbor, WA 98329
Office (253) 857-2056 - Fax (253) 857-2312 - Local 699 Contractor
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
(One Svstern K)er Reirwrt)
A'3 o( q ILA Ave - -Y -
Occupancy Acldress:jj-�-�3 tA&. ct ZrOX0 Occupancy Na
Responsible Person: - Phone Number:
Building Owner:
Phone Number:
Date of Inspection: //`-,;./-Ll Type of Inspection: Quarterly E] Annual 5?�' Other E]
Testers Name (Please Pri
r-- 01*Z/
WAStateFSCC# 0633-11-0016 .
DRY SYSTEM/PRE-ACTION SYSTEM:
1 Trip test (dry trip or full flow) conducted: .................................................. Yes Fj No F]
System tripped in seconds.
2. All flow switches, supervisory switches a d alarm bells test : ..................... Yes F] No F1 N/A Ej
3. Alarm bell operates: ............. ..... .... ..................... .............................. Yes E] NoR N/A E]
second'.
y switches a d
... ......
4. Flow tests conducted: .......... ........................... .................................... Yes 171 No El
A
Flow pressure: psi 2-inch drain .......... .. .......................... Yes El No El
5. Systems inspected and lubricated: ........... ............... ..... ....................... Yes [-] No N/A
6. Air compressor refills system in 30 mi es: ........................ ..................... Yes E] No
7. System drained and restored to rmal operation: ...................................... Yes 0 Noo
8. Were the heat actuation - ices tested on pre -action and deluge system? ..... Yes E] No L] N/A Ej
WET SYSTEM/ANTI-FREEZE SYSTEM.Tested at
1. Trip test conducted: .................................... .... Yes E( No E]
Static pressure: /07 .............. t21- h d
psi Flow pressure: Ctg� psi inc rain? ....... Yes No E] N/A
2. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested: ..................... Yes V No Ej N/A E]
3. Alarm bell operates: ............................................................................. Yes N/No E] N/A E]
4. Systems inspected and lubricated: .......................................................... Yes ER/No El
5. Pressure regulating valves tested: ........................................................... Yes E] No E] N/A Y'
�AWTQMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (continued)
General:
1 Central Station Monitoring? ..........................................................................
Monitoring company name
Yes � No E]
2. Location of Sprinklers
100% ......... V Parking ......... E] Basement ......... E] Hallways ......... El Other ........ EJ
3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed ....................................... Yes E)(No El
4. Sp*rinkler heads less than 50 years old ............................................................. Yes E/ No 0
5. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable .................................................................... Yes[;/ No E]
6. Spare sprinkler heads are available ................................................................. Yes &a" No E]
7. Systems left in service ................................................................................... Yes EM/ No E]
8. Valves are sealed or supervised ...................................................................... Yes 5�/ No E]
9. Signs are provided on valves .......................................................................... Yes �/No E]
10. City static water pressure -psi.
Problems Found:
f
t4c"ya- 4"4
Corrections Made: Date Corrected: Corrected By:
SIGNATURE OF TESTER: 4ai__
AGENCY: Emerald Fire PHONE: 253-857-2056
MAILINGADDRESS: 11021 Cramer Road KPN, Gig Harbor, WA 98329
SNO
.IF
D
Serving Brier, Ednionds
Mountlake Terraceand
the Town of Woodway
www.FireDistrict].org
LOCATION: 239 4th Avenue S
BUSINESS NAME:
Olympic Vista Condos
MAILING
ADDRESS:
BUSINESS OWNER:
Lambert, Fred #201
EMERGENCY-1:
Watson, Marty #302
KEY ACCESS-2:
PERSON CONTACTED: , :Lsr -V
NAME OF INSPECTOR: C'P)&q () I I -,
FIRE FA 12/10 AS 12/10 Fli Lkf3x
SYSTEMS: 1\ I I\ I "I,
FIRE PREVENTION
12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT
OEDMONDS
Everett, WA 98208 0 BRIER
Phone (425) 551-1200 E]WOODWAY
[I MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
Fax (425) 551-1272 0 UNINCORPORATED
FREQUENCY I STATION 11 SHIFF""
365 17 6
PHONE: SCHEDULED 03/01/12
DATE DUE
LIFIR k 422 3202
HOME PHONE: 4257767297
HOME PHONE: 4256723794
HOME PHONE:
CURRENT
CITY YES N 0
BUSINESS
LICENSE 1:1
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
4
FIE _�k -L
_LL
ANNUAL
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS
2
2
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
1 AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1st RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
2nd RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
EXTENSION
GRANTED TO:
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
VIOLATIONS
CITED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
I
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
1 5
VIOLATIONS
1 5
PRE -CITATION
LETTER SENT
CITATION ISSUED
NUMBER:
4
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION:
5
3
7
3
7
RETURN RECEIPT
RECEIVED
6
14
18
4
18
DATE:
DISPOSITION:
7
LETTER NEEDED [] Y�'S NO
LETTER NEEDED I] YES NO
8
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
Emerald Pire
Fire Sprinkler Specialists
11021 Cramer Rd. KPN - Gig HarborWA 98329
Office (253) 857-2056 - Fax (253) 857-2312 - Local 699 Contractor
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
(One Svstern Per Report)
.Z>
'2_3q -�!� AV.-. S.
Occupancy Address: fEdt/y:,,,c.L 4_-Vs, (21bxa, Occupancy Name01)t;&U0'1r, VL�6 a
Responsible Person: Phone Number:
Building Owner: Phone Number:
Date of Inspection: Type of Inspection: Quarterly [:]
Testers Name (Please Print): ��o � I � WA State FSCC#
U I
Annual,R Other E]
0633-IT-05180
DRY SYSTEM/PRE-ACTION SYSTEM:
1. Trip test (dry trip or full flow) conducted: ................................................. Yes El No
System tripped in seconds.
2. All flow switches, supervisory switches ano alarm bells test : ..................... Yes E] No n N/A E]
3. Alarm bell operates: ................. -, N ....... I ............... .............................. Yes E] No F-1 N/A F
4. Flow tests conducted: ............. .... ....................................... Yes E] No E]
Flow pressure: ...... ................................ Yes E] No E]
5. Systems inspected and lubricated: ... Yes El No El N/A 0
inu
6. Air compressor refills system in 3 inutes: .......... ....... ........................... Yes E] No E]
7. System drained and restor to normal operation: ..................................... Yes F] No E]
tu . t
c s
8. Were the heat actua n devices teEsted on pre -action and deluge system? ..... Yes R Noo N/AR
WET SYSTEM/ANfl'-FREEZE SYSTEM: Tested at
I . Trip test conducted: .................................................. ( . ....................... Yes No E]
K-1 /R—
Static pressure: 00 psi Flow pressure: /00 psi'2 inch drain? ....... Yes P No E] N/A
-2., Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested: ..................... Yes E� No E] N/A E]
3. Alarm bell operates: ............................................................................. Yespj NoR N/A E]
4. Systems inspected and lubricated: .......................................................... Yesj�j No E]
5. Pressure regulating valves tested: ........................................................... Yes E] No E] N/AK
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS Lcontinued)
General:
1 . Central Station Monitoring? .......................................................................... Ye�w No E]
Monitoring company name
2. Location of Sprinklers
100% ......... 10 Parking ......... Basement ......... E] Hallways ......... E] Other ......... E]
3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed ....................................... Yes 5a No E]
4. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old ............................................................. Yes F�f No Ej
5. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable .................................................................... Yes No
6. Spare sprinkler heads are available .................................................................. Yes No El
7. Systems left in service .................................................................................. Yes No E]
8. Valves are sealed or supervised ...................................................................... Yes No F-1
9. Signs are provided on valves ......................................................................... Ye�W No [:]
10. City static water pressure psi.
Problems Found:
+
Corrections Made: Date Corrected: Corrected By:
SIGNATURE OF TESTER:
AGENCY: Emerald Fire —PHONE: 253-857-2056
MAILINGADDRESS: 11021 Cramer Road KPN, Gig Harbor, WA 98329
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5T11 AVENUE N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (425) 771-0215
FIRE DEPARTMENT
LOCATION: 239 4th Avenue S
BUSINESS NAME: Olympic Vista Condos
MAILING
ADDRESS:
Lex� ",4-' 1?1 -,7v
BUSINESS OWNER:
EMERGENCY- 1:
KEY ACCESS!2:
PHONE:
FIRE PREVENTION
SAFETY SURVEY
FREQUENCY
STATION& SHIFT
365
17 D
SCHEDULED
03/01/10
DATE DUE 01
UFIR 1. 422
3202
L4ZC -7-76,--77-9
HOME PHONE: 4266 49?-94---
HOME PHONE:4 Z-7- G-7 7-- 3 7 '1
I Lf
HOME PHONE:
PERSON CONTACTED: Mv - L.,i4,A 4_e,, Jst 7�o f I INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTOR: f4vo P-V- '7316 0,6:7C91 i -e-- aeol� .5-1t 4//� 0
FIRE FA11/06AS11/071FDLkI3x_.-kDK_ FEZ-_11[2
SYSTEMS: FA- z_ i ?_k '4s' 17_(O� ANNUAL
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS
11 /.
1 0 o 19 T_ F
C
ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE lo
VIOLATION CODE
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
1st RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
2nd RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
EXTENSION
GRANTED TO:
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
VIOLATIONS
CITED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
1
INSPECTOR
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
D E:
DATE:
3
MOLATIONS
1 5
VIOLATIONS
1 5
PRE -CITATION
LETTER SENT
CITATION ISSUED
NUMBER:
4
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION:
5
3
7
3
7
RETURN RECEIPT
RECEIVED
6
7
4
18
4
18
DATE:
DISPOSITION:
8
�_UETTER NEEDED C] YES [3 NO
LETTER NEEDED 0 YES C] NO
7--1
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
PM�
AVX
%
JfA
fi-�11
AW %
EJI-U�
A -ON
-
xli
ld&.%
W-!-k
Coll *11 T�]Il
Olympic Vista
-77
Condominiums 11 o-7
239 - 4th Ave S
z ooS '17
Now Available
Unit Reservation
Price
AdWEX
101 Sold
$229,950
102
$2259950
201
$399,950
A6 % 202
$3959950
*-!-� 301 Sold Cntg
$524,950
A&% 3 0 2
$4999950
WA
Alp.\
TE 111
AWP.\
WA
AiF.\
Y-E -! =I!
AJF.\
AE -1-1 11
A&%
Arx
4-TE I 11
For Sale
Sq.Ft.
(Builders Plans)
11060
19034
-1-9938
19912
29078
29052
A10%
TY,-
A&%
f-- S . i
vw z-9 3
F-�4
?co,2 -7
Bed/Bath
2/1
2/1-
2/1.75 + Den
2/1.75 + Den
2/1.75 + Den
2/1.75 + Den
Call for more details!
Dawn Runyan
0
Win * ere H.K.W.inc.
425-775-4013� 206-227-9089
AW.\
H.O.D.
$122
.---$119
$233
$229
$251
$249
A WX A WX A k*.\ A WX A WX A i F.\ A k, 0% A] i F.\
RO. Box 82206
Kenmore, WA 98028
James P. Hurley Co. Telephone (206) 486-6665
Environmental Risk Management Consultants FAX (206) 486-7896
SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL
239-4 AVENUE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
JPHC CO# 000802
Prepared For:
Mr. Bruce Hummel
Hummel Construction and Development, Inc.
9927 151 st place Southeast
Snohomish, WA 98290-7037
Prepared By:
James P. Hurley Company
P.O. Box 82206
Kenmore, WA 98028
Phone: (425) 486-6665
Date Prepared:
August 14, 2000
4
Table of Contents
Contents
Purpose I
Executive Summary 1
Background 1,2
Site Description 2
Geology and Hydrology 2
Summary of Field Activities 2,3
Limitations 3
Exhibits
ExIiibit A Vicinity Map
Exl-iibit B Site Plan
ExIiibit C Laboratory Reports
—JPHC P.O. Box 82206 Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone (425) 486-6665 FAX (425) 486-7896
James P. Hurley Co.
Environmental Risk Manogement Consuftonts
PO. Box 82206
Kenmore, WA 98028
Telephone (206) 486-6665
FAX (206) 4 86-7 896
August 14, 2000
Hummel Construction and Development, Inc.
9927 151 st Place Southeast
Snohomish, WA 98290-7037
Attention: Mr. Bruce Hummel
SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL PROJECT
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 239 4'" AVENUE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
CO# 000802
Dear Mr. Hummel:
At your direction, a site investigation of the subject property was conducted by James P.
Hurley Co. (JPHC), an environmental consulting firm. We observed the removal of two (2)
350-gallon underground storage tanks (USTs) from the subject property and performed a
risk assessment of the subsurface soil in the vicinity of the fuel tanks following the tank
removal activities. This report summarizes the findings of our investigation.
PURPOSE
The purpose of our investigation was to observe the removal of the fuel tanks by Hummel
Construction and Development, Inc. [HCDI) and to confirm the presence or absence of
significant petroleum contamination in the soils surrounding the USTs. This site
assessment report is prepared in accordance with the requirements of
WAC 173-360-63D and as outlined in the Washington State Department of Ecology
(WDOE) publication entitled Guidance for Site Checks and Site Assessments for
Underground Storage Tanks, dated February 1991, revised October 1992.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Two (2)'350 gallon single wall steel LISTs were removed from a single excavation on the
east yard of the subject property. -Approximately ten cubic yard of soil, located directly
beneath the former UST1, was impacted by a small quantity of diesel fuel originating from
UST1. The diesel -contaminated soil was transferred to CSR Associated facility in Everett,
Washington for high temperature thermal treatment. All remaining soils are within the
MTCA Method A cleanup standard for diesel in soil of 200 ppm.
BACKGROUND
The subject property had been occupied by a single-family residence and a detached
outbuilding, which housed a single car garage and a single bedroom apartment. HCDI
Sitc Assessnient Rcport
UST Renioval Project
239-4 th menue, Ednionds, Washington
Page I. datcd August 14, 2000
recently purchased the subject property and was in the process of demolishing the
structures in preparation for constructing new residential condominiums on the site. The
USTs [UST1 and UST2) were removed at the recommendation of JPHC in a phase I
environmental site assessment report dated September 21, 1999. UST1 appeared to
have been installed when the facilities were constructed in the 1940's. UST2 appeared to
have been installed more recently. Both USTs were used to store diesel heating fuel for
onsite consumption.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Refer to Exhibit A, Site Plan/Sampling Plan for the locations of the fuel tanks. The USTs
were located adjacent to the southeast corner of the main house. Both USTs and all of the
ancillary piping were removed from a single excavation.
GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY
The property is situated on low permeable glacial till which is underlain by glacially
overridden sand deposits. Groundwater was not encountered within the limits of the
excavation.
SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES
On November 5, 1999, Jim Hurley, an International Fire Code Institute [IFGI) certified site
assessor for Washington State, observed the removal of the fuel tanks by MCDI. Both
tanks were inspected for structural integrity after removal. Approximately six (6) pin size
holes were observed on the bottom of the north tank (UST1). The south tank (UIST2) was
assessed to be in good condition, with no visible signs of corrosive degradation. Visual and
olfactory evidence indicated that diesel contamination was present in the soil beneath
UST1. There were no indications of diesel contamination beneath UST2.
Following the UST removal activities, three representative soil samples were collected from
the limits of the excavation and from the excavated spoil pile for laboratory analysis. Soil
Sample 1 -1 was a discrete sample collected from the base of the excavation beneath UST1
at approximately 5 feet beneath ground surface (bgs). Soil Sample 1-2 was a discrete
sample collected from the base of the same excavation at 7 feet bgs. Soil Sample 2-1 was
a discrete sample collected from the base of the excavation beneath UST2 at
approximately 5 feet bgs. Sample 1-1 exhibited signs of diesel contamination in field
screening tests. Samples 1-2 and 2-1 appeared to be unaffected by petroleum
contamination.
All three samples were submitted for method WTPH-Dx analyses. Sample 1-1 yielded
diesel range hydrocarbons on the order of 3,800 ppm. Samples 1-2 and 2-1 were non -
detectable for diesel range hydrocarbons. We interpreted these results to confirm that
diesel contaminated soil was present in a twelve -inch lens of soil beneath UST1 and that all
other remaining soils were within the IVITCA Method A cleanup standard of 200 ppm.
On November 11, 1999, Jim Hurley returned to the site to observe the excavation of
approximately ten (10) cubic yards of diesel contaminated soil from beneath the former
UST1. At the conclusion of the excavation activities, five soil samples were collected from
the limits of the excavation (Cavity 1) for field screening and laboratory analysis. Samples N,
S, E, and W were composite sidewall samples collected from the north, south, east, and
west sidewalls of Cavity 1. Sample B was a discrete sample collected from the base of
i--JPHC P.O. Box 82206 Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone (425) 486-6665 FAX (425) 486-7896
Site Assessment Report
USTRenloval Project
239 — 4h Avenue, I'Anionds, Washington
Page 3, datcd Augwst 14, 2000
Cavity 1. Each sample was subjected to field screening in headspace tests using a portable
ionization detector. All five samples were non -detectable for diesel range hydrocarbons
under analytical Method WTPH-Dx. We interpreted these results to confirm that
remaining soils in Cavity 1 were within the MTCA Method A cleanup standard of 200 ppm.
Approximately ten (10) cubic yards of diesel contaminated soil was transported to the CSR
facility in Everett, Washington for high temperature thermal treatment.
Each soil sample was collected with a previously decontaminated stainless steel spoon and
transferred to the laboratory in prepared four -ounce sampling jars, sealed with Teflon lids.
The samples were transported in an ice chest equipped with blue ice. A chain of custody
was completed at the time of transport.
LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared using generally accepted professional practices, related to
the nature of the work accomplished, in the same or similar localities, at the time the
services were performed. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client
for the specific application to the project purpose. This report should not be construed to
represent a legal opinion. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood.
We appreciate the opportunity of providing you with our services. If you have any questions
on this matter please call.
-5i-ncerely, - - --I-
JAMES H 74Y Co.
Jame Hurley
Preside t
__JPHC P.O. Box 82206 Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone (425) 486-6665 FAX (425) 486-7896
v I
SEI 890 A? 3�
OVERLOOK.' PK � 2
'IN() PC S, c
V)
--A Vo
_sw_
C�.
135TH (7) < 185TH 185Ti
HUTT 11L SW PL SW
,p PK )86TH PL S 187TH 186T)i ST
18Tm 187TH
I PL SW x _x ST
'o 0�� ST SW
J,
188TH a�j ST S
89TH S Sw :11 CE b4UU _!r
189 PL sle
WATER 8 KE PL 19 H ST SW Ll
'o" I — <i 190TH
CHERR ST 191ST
961, Is
>
13
92ND S ND
U
<
T -� ve
e4, FORES
"I' <
DEL 193RD
DR 194 �j PC "1 -1
I C,
EXCELSIOR 89
S
PL I't st;
Sw
196TH 196TH ST!"
PUGET x
MtLUUY LN PU ET DR 8600
WY 31 13w
0-
tAPLE
V EWLAND WY IILL
BROC LN PA
R I 0�00 co
21, L
k"Af Ec RD EE IIINDLEY Y
- 0 --- . - T �l �98T,
00 ROOKMERE ---- CO
8' ST I -- a- 198
S p !91 ly,
19— M? PIL SW
T ,L SW
S S T vlcw S
lCqR - - - - - - - - - -
GILT <
ER 800 K)UNTAIN VIST
LN LN 1xi WY - - - ----------- --j
TE� L PL 200TH SW
RACKET7-S CD
wy :>
LORA NJ ALOHA
�ANDING CA- f)f 201 ST
AROL -TILZCL '�AROL --L R' Coi
z SIERRA I z
BEACH —wy < FE 02N PC I , I
- -< GLEN ST Sw < Sf �w 2 PO2 11
GLEN ST sl RRA ST 20
V/ <
0390 20
t
20
DALEY <1 24 P -§i-i
s
------ -- I < ST
IVIC loo 10-0-
Z, co 204TIf
X- c rn
SPRAGUE Cn C:� SI, Sw �r, 19
TR S
ZZ7 rrIE HUMIN ii, if
sp .�DMONDS HILL PK CT PC PINE
L FS
�s ?00 C3.) RIDGE
c�o); PK <
S
207f-H CD.
2(17Tfl pL SW
ELL RXff
A R/ ELL ST
OU ----
HIS, OU - - - -
CH �vs AIN ST DR I PL sw ST Sw
DAYTON 8
600
wy
S Y T 209TH PL
Ad
< C/) ::c IAL
7-
ST <) 2 101
RK,. CC8
600
cli
P
W LNU Pt
ILL R 1000
HOWELL CEDAR T AR PL Fs 212Tfi
WY c
Kr 4z
PRUCE vy 01 PAR' L ST
SPRUCE SPRUCE - ST ?0,0
... ST- SPRUCE RD )kog��R Co:
Ty '< Li�H�DCK IL < tt :
214TH PL SW
H L K < Wy
ERBEf < 5 ST 214 H LN TI
PA --I— I URE:LjLAIREL VY Sw
TR 215 ST I 21�TH ST,
7;-- - PL SW 215w 215TI
W
rjurlcN, C0.
EnvironniuntowlSk M0r)Qg0")en1 C01)5ulfants
EXHIBIT A
VICINITY MAP
ALLEY
�D
FORMER
SINGLE FAMILY
HOUSE AT
239 -4TH AVENUE
LQ EDMONDS, WA
4TH A VENUE
EXHIBIT B
rnofonmen101 f?�Sk Monogement Consullo7l— SITE PLAN
EXHIBIT C
LABORATORY REPORTS
---JPHC P.O. Box 82206 Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone (425) 486-6665 FAX (425) 486-7896
OnSite
Enviponmental Inc.
Analytical Testing and Mobile Laboratory Services
November 9, 1999
Jim Hurley
James P. Hurley Co.
P.O. Box 82206
Kenmore, WA 98028
Re: Analytical Data for Project Edmonds
Laboratory Reference No. 9911-037
Dear Jim:
Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on
November 5, 1999.
The standard policy of OnSite Environmental Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the
date of receipt. If you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions
concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
David eister
Project Manager
a
Enclosures
110
�w
14648 NE 95th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 - (425) 883-3881 - Fax (425) 885-4603
F,
Date of Report: November 9, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 5, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11-037
Project: Edmonds
NWTPH-Dx
Date Extracted: 11-8-99
Date Analyzed: 11-8-99
Matrix: Soil
Units: mg/Kg (ppm)
Client ID:
1-1
1-2
2-1
Lab ID:
11-037-01
11-037-02
11-037-03
Diesel Fuel:
3800
ND
ND
PQL:
28
33
28
Heavy Oil:
ND
ND
ND
PQL:
55
66
57
Surrogate Recovery:
o-Terphenyl
---
81%
86%
Flags:
F
3
r_
Date of Report: November 9, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 5, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11-037
Project: Edmonds
NWTPH-Dx
METHOD BLANK QUALITY CONTROL
Date Extracted: 11-8-99
Date Analyzed: 11-8-99
Matrix: Soil
Units: mg/Kg (ppm)
Lab ID: MB1 108S1
Diesel Fuel: ND
PQL: 25
Heavy Oil: ND
PQL: 50
Surrogate Recovery:
o-Terphenyl 100%
Flags:
4
Date of Report: November 9, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 5, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11-037
Project: Edmonds
NWTPH-Dx
DUPLICATE QUALITY CONTROL
Date Extracted: 11-8-99
Date Analyzed: 11-8-99
Matrix: Soil
Units: mg/Kg (ppm)
Lab ID: 11-037-03 11-037-03 DUP
Diesel Fuel: ND ND
PQL: 25 25
RPD: N/A
Surrogate Recovery:
o-Terphenyl 86% 85%
Flags:
5
Date of Report: November 9, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 5, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11-037
Project: Edmonds
Date Analyzed: 11 -8-99
Client ID
1-1
1-2
2-1
% MOISTURE
Lab ID % Moisture
11-037-01 9.0
11-037-02 24
11-037-03 12
OnSite
Enviponmental Inc.
DATA QUALIFIERS AND ABBREVIATIONS
A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery
data.
B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample.
C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are
within five times the quantitation limit.
D - Data from I:— dilution.
E - The value reported exceeds the qUantitation range, and is an estimate.
F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds.
G - Insufficient sample quantity for duplicate analysis.
H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample
preparation, and be impacting the sample result.
I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits.
J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate.
K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeniety. The sample was
re -extracted and re -analyzed with similar results.
L - The RPD is outside of the control limits.
M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (toluene-napthalene) are present in the sample.
0 - Hydrocarbons outside the defined gasoline range are present in the sample; NVVTPH-Dx recommended.
P - The RPD of the detected concentrations between the two columns is greater than 40.
Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of th-� control limits.
S - Surrogate recovery data is not avai!3ble due to the necessary dilution of the sample.
T - The sample chromatogram is not similar to a typical
U - The analyte was analyzed for, but ��,as not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.
V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicatu recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects.
W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicat,-; RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects.
X - Sample extract treated with a silica yel cleanup procedure.
Y - Sample extract treated with an acid cleanup procedure.
Z -
ND - Not Detected
MRL - Method Reporting Limit
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
Ohnfin of
-r -i-T
EnViPonmental Im. I ij i . - Project Chemist: ri-7
14648 NE 95th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Laboratory No.
Fax: (425) 885-4603 Phone: (425) 883-3881
(Check One)
U Sa
Company: _7 me Day U 1 Day
iAu iy\ rv-� (2(yy\ t
_5 -tf-,j p- 0 2 Day LJ 3 Day
Project No.:
0
(D
N
Standard C0
X(Hydrocarbo 1 5 U
Project Name: n ena yses: days,
U) C3
All other anal ses: 7 days) 0 r� —
= C\J
X Co Co
w 0 co
Project Manager: (0 C'J 0
2 Co C\J Co a)
C) Co
e X
0 >' (D
(0t er) cli Co .0 < F13
CD (0 Cc
T- T- 1: 0 c: >1 (D
IL o -0 Cl) C)
-0
>
(n co -J X 7-
z z z -6 0- n-
CL F- >
ce
1/ 2,01 '1 1 1
DATE
TIME
DATE
(I q1
RECnED B
FIRM
ECEIVED BY
:DATE
DATE
R R LI
ELINQUISH D BY
TIME
DATE
TIRM-----�
TIME
FIRM
TI M
—E
RFVIFwpn Pv
COMMENTS:
OnSite
Enviponmental Inc.
Analytical Testing and Mobile Laboratory Services
November 18, 1999
Jim Hurley
James P. Hurley Co.
P.O. Box 82206
Kenmore, WA 98028
Re: Analytical Data for Project Edmonds
Laboratory Reference No. 9911-076
Dear Jim:
Enclosed are the analytical results and associated quality control data for samples submitted on
November 11, 1999.
The standard policy of OnSite Environmental Inc. is to store your samples for 30 days from the
date of receipt. if you require longer storage, please contact the laboratory.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have.any questions
concerning the data, or need additional information, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
David
Project Manager
Enclosures
14648 NE 95th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 - (425) 883-3881 - Fax (425) 885-4603
4
Date of Report: November 18, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 11, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11-076
Project: Edmonds
NWTPH-Dx
Date Extracted:
11-15-99
Date Analyzed:
11-15-99
Matrix:
Soil
Units:
mg/Kg (ppm)
Client I D:
N
S
E
Lab ID:
11-076-01
11-076-02
11-076-03
Diesel Fuel:
ND
ND
ND
PQL:
27
29
31
Heavy Oil:
ND
ND
ND
POL:
54
59
63
Surrogate Recovery:
o-Terphenyl
Flags:
80%
81%
65%
3
Date of Report: November 18, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 11, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11 -076
Project: Edmonds
NWTPH-Dx
Date Extracted: 11-15-99
Date Analyzed: 11-15&16-99
Matrix: Soil
Units: mg/Kg (ppm)
Client I D: w B
Lab ID: 11-076-04 11-076-05
Diesel Fuel:
N D
N D
PQL:
30
29
Heavy Oil:
ND
ND
PQL:
60
58
Surrogate Recovery:
o-Terphenyl
Flags:
62%
146%
4
Date of Report: November 18, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 11, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11-076
Project: Edmonds
NWTPH-Dx
METHOD BLANK QuALITY CONTROL
Date Extracted: 11-15-99
Date Analyzed: 11-15-90
Matrix: Soil
Units: mg/Kg (ppm)
Lab ID: M131115S1
Diesel Fuel: ND
PQL: 25
Heavy Oil: ND
PQL: 50
Surrogate Recovery:
o-Terphenyl 92%
Flags:
5
Date of Report: November 18, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 11, 1999
Lab Traveler: 11-076
Project: Edmonds
NWTPH-Dx
DUPLICATE Q UALITY CONTROL
Date Extracted: 11-15-99
Date Analyzed: 11-15-99
Matrix: Soil
Units: mg/Kg (ppm)
Lab ID: 11-076-01 11-076-01 DUP
Diesel Fuel: ND ND
PQL: 25 25
RPD: N/A
Surrogate Recovery:
o-Terphenyl 80% 76%
Flags:
9
Date of Report: November 18, 1999
Samples Submitted: November 11,1999
Lab Traveler: 11-076
Project: Edmonds
Date Analyzed: 11 -12-99
% MOISTURE
Client ID
Lab ID
% Moisture
11-076-01
7.0
N
11-076-02
15
S
11-076-03
20
E
11-076-04
16
w
11-076-05
14
B
OnSite
Enviponmental Inc.
DATA QUALIFIERS AND.ABBREVIATIONS
A - Due to a high sample concentration, the amount spiked is insufficient for meaningful MS/MSD recovery
data.
B - The analyte indicated was also found in the blank sample.
C - The duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to high result variability when analyte concentrations are
within five times the quantitation limit.,
D - Data from 1: dilution.
E - The value reported exceeds the quantitation range, and is an estimate.
F - Surrogate recovery data is not available due to the high concentration of coeluting target compounds.
G - Insufficient sample quantity for duplicate analysis.
H - The analyte indicated is a common laboratory solvent and may have been introduced during sample
preparation, and be impacting the sample result.
I - Compound recovery is outside of the control limits.
J - The value reported was below the practical quantitation limit. The value is an estimate.
K - Sample duplicate RPD is outside control limits due to sample inhomogeniety. The sample was
re -extracted and re -analyzed with similar i -,sults.
L - The RPD is outside of the control
M - Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (1.,Iuen.e-napthalene) are present in the sample.
0 - Hydrocarbons outside the defined ga,,-�oline range are present in the s@mple: NV\/TPH-Dx recommended.
P - The RPD of the detected concentratio: .3 between the two columns is greater than 40.
Q - Surrogate recovery is outside of the c )ntrol limits.
S - Surrogate recovery data is not availa!,'3 due to the necessary dilution of the sample.
T - The sample chromatograrn is not simi! :r to a typical
U - The analyte was analyzed for, but wz�� not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.
V - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate recoveries are outside control limits due to matrix effects.
W - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD are outside control limits due to matrix effects.
X - Sampleextract treated with a silica 9,1 cleanup procedure.
Y - Sample extract treated with an acid c:—jnup procedure.
Z -
ND - Not Detected
MRL - Method Reporting Limit
PQL - Practical Cluantitation Limit
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
I
P-1hMin inf
EnViPonmental Inc.
Project Chemist:
14648 NE 95th Street Redmond, WA 98052 rp Laboratory No.
Fax: (425) 885-4603 Phone: (425) 883-3881 (Check One)
Company: LJ Same Day LJ 1 Day
Project No.: C(3,r,_5-tv-q 2 Day 3 Day co
0
(D
Standard Cv
co
Project Name: x(Hydrocarbon 1 5 days,
ena yses:
V) C,
All other ana es: 7 days) rl
r X Co C\J LO
w 0 co 'F5
Project Manager: I-_ (D >1 C3
Ln co C\J _D 0 C\l 00
cc (n 0 Co
0 _R X 0
(0 t e 1) 0 >' 0 rc-\l
Cu — cc
Y cc <
X U)
C 0)
to
0 0-
E CO
_J T_ X
z z z
> w
10
f I 2� LOD
FIRM
RELINQUISH D BY
TI R �M
FR7 V-7 w F n n,
DATE IN ki REC _ED B
iA7 E FIRM
—
DATE RECEIVED BY
DATE COMMENTS:
� �'�Sk
TIME
DATE
TIME
0
�E
Westfall. John
From:
Smith, Mike
Sent:
Friday, July 21, 2000 6:59 AM
To:
Westfall, John
Subject:
Bureau Update
142!�;- �0(. okob, OFC -
John, I hope you had an enjoyable week off. Things slowed this week and I was able to get less further behind.
Here are a couple issues hanging:
1) Westgate Chapel/Fire Alarm testing went well on 7/20 until the panel crashed. All the smoke and fire dampers on the
1 st and 3rd floor have been tested. One smoke on the 1 st floor, west exit area had problems and will need to be re-
checked. All horn -strobes were checked and functioned. The audibility with the horns in the gym, the kitchen, and the 3rd
floor, south hallway were required to be increased in volume.
I also requested an outside horn strobe as we missed it on tLhtplan review.(east entrance location)
Lance from the alag,l[I :X)LI''J1A1';;I fl
ftre—sday morning, 7-15—arCSOO-.—Fforwarded his voice mail to you.
2J-The FS system at Olympic Vista/Lori Landis called and would like to add a — -tor cov r undlbar-,
garage door(when door is raised). The head is a dry sidewall with extended coverage but is for Light Hazard Occ. My
contention is something is better than nothing. Lori has told me she is having trouble finding a head for the proper Occ
rating. I appreciate the fact they brought this to our attention. I would guess they did this because they knew either you or
myself would bring it up(that says something positive regarding our work). I made the call and approved it. Specs are in
your tray for review. —I/
-up.
That is it for now. The TOE is under control and everybody is happy(l think).
See you on 8-1.
429-4133-5077' FIDUP.NCED FIRE PROT.
92-- P03 jLL 210 100 10:11
F'.0, 11973e, - 144!1,, Avc. N1.
.-.�D VA N C E D
FAX' 4,")
I() N, C(AV 1� PON
rAX TRANSMITTAL
DATE --2=fa-oo
TO
ATTENTION : l61/Aec5-
FAX H
FROM ZA VeL&
SUBJECT
RE
Aaz
-T- dL[
?C1 IA-)
j2__
//-"' /,,;U C) -�rl OAJ S —
a -A /-. 5 -:- .4,ZA. --3 - ene-
06
8tflNVf I'ii3.lF/,R OF PAGES TflIS'YRA)N-SMISSION:JINCLU-DtiNG THIS PAGE
E, 160�) r8 - Spokorl-o, V%'milington 91,,:-)()7
9%,11) 51, 4^ HUM 0 voincouvo" Was'llingum 9�,)682
489-504; 7-
I-A X: , H59 - 5 0 4 -1 17AN: W10-3649
4!p 6_; �xv Ge y
L4
OT tOl 00 4 OE -nf Tod EE6 *J-Wd 361i C3DNHO(ld
425-48:3-507? RDV;NCED FIRE PROT. 923 Porl- T LL 20 '00 10;11
L2
ITZA -*A�qfio?-
tA IL %k
CP
lo
\X
IV
45
710rJ
K
tis
In
L) Q �ZTC-
1 6 T4V--
Vz I
Iny))
V91
$3
to
J
425-483-507? ADUANCED FIRE PROT. 8% Poe JLL 19 120 11:01
-.d�[,A�Jlern I I A t� P.O. Bc),x i.143 s 19738 - 144th (2001 48
D) VANCED 8()()': 2. 1
%, FIRE PROTECTION INC. VVu()diwl-;l1c, Waslling�on FAX: 48);
lqbm —
Alit
FAX TRANSMITTAL
DATE,
ra- 3 bl" i-a-, I p1m m - ----
ATTENTION: A I kv-� S,," k
FAX N
FROM
SUBJECT
RF
--7-1 -2,
LA
: �-JLq "-PtC, \) k A,,—
L Oc-A-% \ gz��-,�- Fv-0 t-A
'TvAvs -- -- S (2A6.2 lij-S-TAU-d;�
-001/0-0- Ck--\ LA Q!�q A00 L'i k
4C
tA.) %A
c->
4 . k-AAvLE AQ�:j
LA Q�,�
I
NUMBER OF PAGES THIS TRANSMISSION:��INCLUDING THIS PAGE
r-, 1(,)1)6 Holyoke rb , Spokane, Washinglon 992017,
12013 N�E, 991h St. 21080 * VIXOLlver, Washinglon
4.509) 09-5040
NO: 4139-504,;
FAX: 4k3l)-5044
3ellinglom:
('300) 718-40HI
MX): "239-34,17
%t.10L0UVCl':
1360% 896,3650
800: 260-9701
FAX: 890-'1049
4 '5 --4E) --50"-, RD ANCE F I PE FRO 8?6 PC JUL IS 100 10:-�
-I !WA-5elcz- 'v, e"Tlvt 1--oi
. �A
Lit
T
V) t
QL 1��k I 1-) "0 16�
S= -94e-
i-4
425-483-5077 1�.,UURINICED FIRE PROT. 8%- P07 JLA- 19 00 11: 00
DRY HORIZONTAL SIDEWALL SPR'NKLERS, EC
MODEL F96010-48 DiESIGNER, 1/2" ORIFICE
'Whun the F950,,Q.48 i.s in sprvice, the Yoke, J,�e pwg an-j
water, �,s preveoted (rorr. 'enter�ng Vie 0-Ring $Qa! frCrr tie Inlet and initiat.
and C-Ring Seal Ing watar liow.
F960A. -43 in tile !nlQ-*, of the Sprink!,ar. UPon ex,
The 112 inch ari.'ice Mar assarritly �y the PjUq
Cesigner E0 Dry Morizonta! Sid all pOSUre to a jemperaju.,e S!Acietll to The EscuIaheQn Plate has been de.
Sprinklet,s (Re!. Fiq--i�ilre- A) are 'J(O- opejra�e the suib, the Bulb 6iizz,�ers signed to piroyida 1 inch of total hor�-
MA!ie 3poinklers of *he feenglb,9 �jl and the &!b ie&.* IS (efiased. 7he zQntw sdiumment (plus or minus 1/2
'rhey am intrended to( use in light compressed Spring j�,- then able t-) ex. irlch)� to assure proper field positionlng
11,1ZArd, eVended coverage (EC) a.,;to. pand and pvlh the Water Tvbp, as well and to reduce the accvracy to whicl,
matic spfinkter system applications as the C,0`44e Tube ouhvard. Tsiis ac- the SprirYfer fitting must be Installed,
pe r NIFPA 13, lion sirrwiltareovsiy ptj�s outjvard on The a inrh outside diameter of pie
Th4y We 06signed for instaiiation
-&long a wail andjust, berteath a smooth
atid levei ceiling. Hor"zQntal 3idawatl
aprinl-Jery are enerally used irs iisu zf
pendent sprinTers because of aes.
thetic, building cons tfuct:oa, or in3tai-
!ztion ecorionly considera',lons.
Ayaila�le In 135'F and ;55'F temper.
3turit fatir,93, as we!l as in order
lengths of 1/2 inoh incrernefll!3 fror-,
2-1/2 'to 48 inches, the F96010.4e is
inlended for use in applict?,tiolls w,-;erc!
the sprinkler$ andior a prtion e,,f the
cOnnectin-61 piping may be exposeo to
ff�e�zing ten"Peratures (e,q. horizor.tal
p1ping eltensions frorn a wet pipe Sys.
tom tf�(01�gh a wall to protec, A- f�aqler
or wi unhoated area ol a �uildlngl,.,
COMPONENTS;
1-0004ctoe
Z-F(vre ,
340'dc 70#
Sub-assambl,/
V Vor �,j 40
15-spr:119
8-cernotessivi
scee",
7-13,jib
e-auib si!,�t
9-cacing
13-0-Rov Seat
111AP Piazo
piecs
Prinm;n U.S.A. it -92
I'FEWIVIATuRE RATINGS AIND BULB
LIOUID COLOR CODE:
13s 1167-0 Orange
155'F 11 661C Red
NOMINAL K-FACTorl:
5. 5 " 0 91M + N573)
75,22 (LPM + 4M-r,
"S" ORDCR LENGTHS-
2-1/2 b 48 ircho,,s in 112 �no) imementS
FINISH COMG;NATIONS;
SPrtnkI4:r escutchoon
Cmrorna Plated Chrome Plated
ch�ome Mated White PXAtod
Naturar Bross While Painted
5" ORDER LEN1yri
-1/2 (63"3 Mtn I M irl I Mk: M
A I N �AL 48'(1,22MIMAXI' VIT WIG" (14 3 mm)
MWUNTINC SURFAC'E (WAL.L)
'J.
Np",
VEN r 4 J
ROLE
............
CCIA,
r
j
ER0N(
�AT�ZAWAY Mtn'
7-EMPERATURE R471NO IS V.7,04 14C.5m.n;
OIAME r�R
3'-1JD1CA-1E0 INN OULECTOP (Pteef
,I &j.4 E.A' 0 E D)
FIGUREA
MOOEL 1=26WO-40 EC DRY HOR:ZONTAL SIDEWALL SPR)NKLEF1
WITH STANDARD ESCUTCHEON PLATE
TO$V,
425-48-7-5077 ADVANCED FIRE FRCT.
896 P06 JLL 19 100 10:59
t
013C"AA31 14 U.S. CA"O.f 1%. *$WTI jQ#fjj
S Is Is 10 11 34 31
Now"
snow
=3
son=
11 1" 175 1*9
.110000109 04 krT&A$ 094 WXWTS
5.0
13
I,$
FIGURE 8
NOMINAL DiSCHARGE CURVE
outer piece of the Escutcheon Plate
combined with the 1-314 Inch diameter
clearance hole size also contributes to
I
the ease O.'inStal!ation by covering off -
set clearance holes.
The Escutcheon Plate is a separable
two-piece design which al;ows instal.
lation of the sprinklers and pressure
testing Of the fire protection system,
prior to wall construction andicir appli-
cation of a finish coat to the wall, it also
permits earinishing of a wall surface
without having to first shut down the
fire prot"ton system and remove the
sprinklers,
The 112 inch orifice Model F96010-48
EC Dry Horizontal Sidewall Sprinklers
are listed by Underwriters Labora.
tories Inc, and Undereriters' Labora.
tories of Canada.
The laboratory listings only apply to
the temperatu, e ratings. order lengths,
sprinkler finishes, and escutcheon
plate finishes stated in Figure A, and
only appt to +he service conditions
indicated (n the Technical Data and EC
Design Criteria sections,
WARM?VG
The Model F960IQ43 EC Dry Hori-
xontal Sidawall Sprinklers described
herein must be installed and main.
la'red in compliance with this docu.
me.,?I, as welt as appliccible standards
of the National Fire Protec!ion As-
oc *at iopt, in addition to the stdndo rds
orany other auti'toritfes hculngjuris.
diction. 0 ilure to do so may impair
the integrity of these devices.
TAe owAer it rcipons�ble for main-
MIN.
Ml N.
Will.
TEMP
FLOW")
PRESSURE(")
QA
APPLICATION
FT x F7
T
GPM
PSI
C
FEET
EC18"
16 x 16
135 & tS5
26
U.3
4 -0 12(')
e
ECID)
16 a I a
135 & 155
29
27.8
41c,12(41
a
1516*1
135 & 155
32
_xu
--lic-
E05T
ISX16
135 &_F55___29
27.8
410 12(e)
9
CENTER�.INE OF
SPRiNK,.EA wATERWAT
W
+
NO 0- 17 FEET P*-- 0 <C- 14 FEET
LIMIT M!NwVM M L)(. VAX. MINIMUM
----------------------
LIMITS OF $1140LE *OEFLECTOR-To-
SPAINKLCR COVERAGE DISTAKr
AREA
NOTES;
a) Ligh! Hazard Occupancy automatic sprinkler system applications per NFPA 13.
(b) Requirement Is based on mlinimum now in GPM from each sprinkler. T no indica!ed resi& at
pressums are based on the nominal K-factor,
(c] To meet this requirement, 09 cerlorline of the waterway (Ref. Fig. A) fri..'st be Insialled
between 4.7)16 and 121APInchas below the coiling,
TABLE A
INSTALLATION CRITEPIA FOR 1.1 INCH ORIFICE
MODEL F9601048 EC DRY HORIZONTAL SIDEWALL SPRINKLERS
""n"Zo"eir fire protection 4yitem
are ces in proper operating'aan.
dition. The Installing contractor or
man ufacturer should be contacted rel-
ative to any questions.
The Model F9601 Q-48 EC Dry Hori.
zontal Sidewall Sprinklers cannot be
instilled In threaded elbow f4itings or
plain end pipe fitt`rgs without first
having the fitt,*ng manufacturer ver.
Ify thot there will be clearance be.
tween Me F9601Q.48 Inlet and the
inside of the pipe fitting. Faiture to
w7e c pipe ritting with clearance for
:he F9601Q.48 Inlet may result in a
binding of the Plug and a failure of
thespriphler fooperate or, injufficient
engaVmen: of the I inch NPT pipe
thread; with consequent leahage.
The 11 inch crifice Model F960/0-48
EG Dry Heirizontal Sidewall Sprinklers
are rated for use at a rnaximt= service
pressure of 175 psi, The avallable!erri-
peraiure ratings, order lengths, sprink.
;er fln;shes, and escutcheor plate fin-
ishes are given in Figure A.
inches. To meet this requirement, the
center1rie of the sprinkler waterway
(Ref, Fig, A) mvst be between 4-7 / 16
and 12-7/16 inches below the ceiling.
The norninal dsoharge curve for the
1716010.48 is plotted in Figure B and it
represents the flow '0'in U.S. gallons
per minute!gpir) as delerrilned by the
form-ila:
0= Krp
where the rominal sprinkler discharge
coefficient'K* - 5.5 and'p'm pfessure
In pounds per square inch (psi), Listing
staridarq�s permit the actual value of
W to vary from S.3 to 5.8.
The F960/0-48 EC Dry Horizontal
Sidewail Sprinklers are to be ins'alled
in fittings that provide clearanc� ba.
tweer the F960�0_48 inlet and the in-
sid-e of the fitting. The F960/0-48
Sprinklers may be installed In I inch
N'PT outlet �-onnections of
iron threaded tee fitVngs per ANSI
B16.3 or cast iron threaded tee fittings
per ANSI 815.4, For threaded t0 fit-
tings. the end sprinkler fitting on a
branch line is to be a plvgged tee flttlm�
(Ref. Figure A).
The 1`96WO-48 must be Installed with Gruylnk(Ri Sock-Itym x ! Inch NPT 9;4a
a deflector to Ceiling distance of 4 to 12 outlet filtings mari,,ifactured by Grinne!l
I;DVWCED F 1r"-,'E PROT.
SICK F AR W
4'
"D L
L-A-
J1
4
-1 VA -tJ
FLOW,
lit 2
11, -6
UNTERLINE OF 16' X 16- CCVERi0C 4;t�kf
OULECNR-TO-CV�.�NG: 4 !NCHeS
BACK WALL FAR INA L 4'
SICEWA LL
V'1
ftt
.EA
�EFLECTOF? --*to- CCIL) -40, 4 INCHU
101 BACK W ALL FAR INALL 01
2-
AJ
6 1
01
41 e. tZ 1 16
r.rNTERLINE OF !6* X 20' COVERA0Z AF�A
DFFLECTOR - TID-MLING t 4 M�MES
BACK WALL FAR WALL,,
SMALL 5.
il
01 4
CVN.'ERLIN� OF 15' X 16' CO11ERA.-'E ARSA
2G,
Z'
1. P;.0(em.s 3hc*.i W:th rV caNng mounte� abstrix*ions,
See Warranly sectio'k,
FIGUSE C
NOMIMALWETTING PA77ERNS AT MINIMMA REOUIME40 FLOWS
FOR EC A?PLICATIONS
-3-
G�iE') P05 JT UL IS 100 1 r): 58
GI:ir ' pora:iom aiso provice atiequate
claa'am;q Oelwaen the F960o'0-48
lr;-�t and (he insidl r'! �hc titzing,
Th-?P1 2 and Inlet are brasr, per AS—iN
815,1636000), and ih..;ii 0411rrj
siIii-,one nibber. The Casir,.I; is ga!va-
nl�zed curnan steel per AS'rM, A135
Grada� A, The Frame is bronze per
ASTIM 962 ',C,�3600), th.e Me= is
bras-s pttr ASTM e36 (C22000), the
Cornpressior Semov Is bronze per
ASTNI 8140 (0314CO), and ',he two
p4css 0! trIe Escutcheon Plate are
0,02-0 inch Vick carbo..l steel per SAS
10118/1CM Tlh.e Wvar Tub;j is b-ass
per ASTM 9135 Th e Bulb
Seat, So��ng, and Yo�e ate ail Type
3N stainless sltel, The Gvide Tsibe
suo-membly is comsvu�:ted of Type
302 stair.le3s Meet ar-d brass per
ASTM SIS �C360M).
Tie 1/2 inch oriNce MO-44el F960/048
E0 Cry Horizontal Sidewall Sprinkfers
must only be installed am6 utilized In
Light, Hazard Qccupanc4s, under
smooth and level cellings, and In ac-
cofdance with the criteria givem In
Table P- The mm'na(wa:tirg pa!terns
are 11livstrated in Figure C for (�@ mni.
rMum 1,low$ reqvieel� for each coverage
area.
i;OTE
f'or couerage area dimer.31anj less
thcrt c'- bf.lweem tAci;e b1dicated in
7461CA, i. 4 riecess-3r-, to use -"hemilt-
imum riqij,*r(,,d .1�wforiAe naxtAfgh.
es: tredM 0�:) C.qd �emivth (L)foe- whiqh
in s lion e.riteria are itated.
Oeil�m� rnmuntedl obstruct:oms such as
healing or a�r -oriditioning diffusers,
overhang.s, and liol'it fixtums must be
located above an elevation, as shown
in F: gure 0, ,vh. are viey wil! not Into.-
fe.e with the, proper distribution of
w-ite, btj the svrinkler�
2\1 0 TE
TheF.9501Q-43 S c ri0i,',orr muse NOT
6.? Ustcl WIM 6canv, jalses, Qr ducts
locceed toiiAin ehe spriakler coverage
*'ee— They may be Ixated clorg the
bounda.,ie. tirparating adjacent
vprinAlcr '2reas'
Branch, rmss, and feedmaim piping
that' is connected, to dry horizontal
sidewall sprinMers and subject to
ire ezingtampe rames must be pitched
for drainagil in accordame with the
425-483-5077 RDVqNCED FIREE PROT.
896 PO4 JLL 19 '00 10:57
2 �
0,
TES:
SiOEw A LIL
2C..
ON', Z. 4, V 81 / 10' 12' 14' 16' 16' 20'
SPA NKIEel LCENTERLINE OF COYERA�E AREL
PLAN VIEW
or a given posItIon within the ocverage area, coiling mounted obstructions must not hang
)elow the oievalion dim;nsion given in tho 9(aph,
:Ievatian dimensions efe with respect to the top of M De(lectot Hat (ref. Fig.A). where
=!,.ive (-o) dimensions are ;bove the Deflector Mst and negative I(-) dimensions are below.
Re!erence: The Cefleolof Hat Is 711 G' above the centedine of the sprinkler waterway.)
FIGURIE 0
ALLOWABLE ELEVATION FOR CEILING MOUNTED OBSTRUCTIONS
WCH AS HEATING OR AIR CONDITIONING DIFFUSERS, OVERHANGS,
AND LIGHT FIXTURES
,.i,rum requirements of the National
; Protection A;scciatiol) for drY P;PO
inkler systems.
t ..oliter piece of the Escutcheon
cannot be used to hold the
.3-48 Sprinkler in position. Pipe
)oort must be provided In acco(-
i6e with the minimum requirements
�he National Fire Protection Assock
)n with respect to armovers and wall
-unted sidewall sprinklers.
ierl dry horizontal sidewall sprinR-
i; a,,e to be used on wet pipe sp(ink-
systems prctedng areas s-loject to
ezing temperatures (e.g.. ci�N'rs or
9zers), consideration must be given
(he appropriate length of the sprink-
that will prevent freezing of the
w!ri the connilctingg pipes, due to
-iduction. The following are the min-
im recommended lengths between
face of the FS60/0.48 sprinkler
rig and the outside surface of the
)tected area, when the temsperature
,rounding the wet pipe sprinkler sys.
n; is maintained at a minimum tern-
iature of 40*F:
i inches wher, the temperature
,ii.hln the protected area is O'F;
12 inches when the temperature
vithin the protected area is -20'F;
ia inches when the temperature
i
.in the protected area is 40'F;
?,4 inches when the temperature
aithin the protected area is -60'F.
'r ;rotecte� area temperatures be-
tween those given above, the mini-
mum recommended length frorn the
face of the fitting to the outside of the
protected a rea may be determined by
Interpolating between ihe indivAusl
values.
NOTES
The Model F9601Q-48 EC Dry Hori-
zontal Sidewall Sprinkler MU31 only
be installed In f1tiings that meet the
requirements of the Warning and
Technical Data sections.
Refer to the System Design eirction for
othdr impo,-tant rrquirements regard-
ingpiping design.
Do not Install any bulb type sprinkler
11the bulb is cr4oked or th ere is a loss
of liVid from the bulb. With ihe
sprin ter held horizontal. a zmall air
bubble should be present. The diame-
fer o(,,ht air bu6b!e is approximcf0y
1116 inch (or the 23571571C and
155 TJ 681C tempera ture rating;.
The sprinkl.er fitting should be located
so that the face -of -fitting to mounting
s�rfpce distance Is within plus or
minus 114 Inch of 'he sprinkler order
length. The remaining escutcheon
plate adjustment can then be used to
compensate for the possible manufac-
luring var�ations In the take-out of the
fittings. as well as in the make -in of the
IR
SPRINKL.Ep 1, P; I T
FirTINO
'4` L5VEL
LONSER
OP WATEPov&Y N:PP1.0
VEFI.r.CTOR
FIGURE E
LEVELING OP
SPRINKLER FITTING
AND DEFLECTOR
sprinklers (its permitted by ANSI
B1,20.1).
The F96010-48 must be Installed wlth
a deflector to ceiling distance of 4 to 12
inches. To meet this raqOrement, the
centerline of the sprinkler waterway
(Set. Fig. A) must be between 4-7/115
and 12-7/15 Inches below the ceiling.
The Model F960/0-48 must be In-
stalled w,th the centerline of the water-
way horizontal and perpendicular to
the back wall suriace, T he word *TOP*
on thd deffector must face upwards
toward the ceiling.
It is recommended tinat, a lightweight
spirit level (less then I pound), be used
1b level the sprinkler filling and the
sprinkler Deflector, as shown in Figure
E.
NOTE
The Deflector has a raired porit ion at
the front; consequently, the spirit level
must be positicned'on the rear flat
portion of the Derecitor
Proceed with the installation as fol.
lows:
1. Apply pipe thread sealant sparingly
I
m 1h6 1 inch NPT sprinkler threads
only, Use of a Teflort based pipe
joint sealant is recommended.
2. Install the F960IC-48 by wrenching
on " Cas'inq with a pipe wrench,
whenever the Casing Is readily
accessable. Otheirwise, use a 10
1,
Inch adjustable wrench appited to
thawrench fie'.3 of the Frame.
NOTES
A leak light I in1h SPTOPFirkler
joint should be oblained with a
torque of 20 �o 30 fi. tbs. Hilgher
levels of torque may distort the
frilet with consequent leahrle or
impairment of tAesprinhler.
Do not ciltem.ol to ma)ie.up for in-
f DuPont Registered Trademar%
425483-5077 �0):-,NCED FIRE PROT.
895 P03 TUL 19 '20 10:57
ESCUrCHCON. OUT�R PIE--.-C
PRONGS
FIGUSE F
ESCUTCHEON OUTER PIECE
INSTALLATION PROCEDUl"IE
$Uffi:ient adjust.ltej� In ar, es-
C91Che0A ' DIate 6y under. or ovar,
iighten!Me the 'qprinA!er' R!Adjus.,
t�'ep
, osition of th-0 spri'ItAlfrfiftinr
to suit.
3. Ahef the wall Mas teen Installed or
t,.e rinish coal has beer, ap ied, in.
stall t�eculer Piece Of the r3cutch.
eon as fdI")wi;:
a, Peter to Figurg F and place the
outer piece ol th4 EtCutcheein
over ore aide of the Deflector
V-1h ore pair of the p.ongs at the,
bottom. as shcAvrt in Figwe F. ar!d
with the cftr pair of Prongs di.
rertly above the Deflectcr.
Pass the ou!er p,'ece of the Es.
culchean ever the Collector by
hodronlatly 31wrigirl'a the culer
rdiece 90' to", dithe waV,
Slide thP outer Piece of the Es-
cutcheon over 1he inner piece
until h 0 outer piecla comes fn
ccntact lit,� thewall.
Aitoinatic 5.primklefs must neve� be
sh;pped cc stored where their lemper.
aVires wli� excepd 1QQ'F/38 C and
the',, Must revsr t)e painted, plated.
Coe led or 0�herwise a!terec after leav-.
ing the fa,'-�Qry, Modifla,,d sprinklers
mwit b,) replacce-1. Sprinklars thut hij�,e
beeri exposec! *z --orro, I va products ol
coribustion, tit have not operated,
shclj�d be replacpd if they cannot te
completely cleaned by wiping tf�e
sprin.'�Ier, wlth a cloth or by brush.1rig it
With a sop, �tistle brvsh�
Care must be exercised to avoid ijam.
age to !hq sprinkleis — both before
ane. afte( ins"aliatiori. Sprinklers da.m.
3;ed by dropping, striking. wrench
tw' :st/sliPPag&. Or the liK;, mist be re.
Placed, Alsc, replace a--iy sprinkler thal
has a Cracked bulb ,,r that has lost
liqvid from its bulb, 11're!, Insiallafion
Section.)
If a sprinkler rmL,:' be removed for
soine reason, do - � teirStall it or a
repfacomlefi,, wi,,nouj refristailing the
o,Aer piece of the FsCutcheon Plate, if
the Ov',Or piece of at, escutcheon plate
becomes dislocliped dir;. ig ,%ervj!:,q, , e.
place it irnmedij , jely,
IV0171's
Absence of the oueer piece of an ca.
curc.Aeon pZa.le may delay 'he time to
Gp6nAler operation in..; i'"'re licuallion,
.90'rore closirg a fire protection system.
Cor 'rol ualve for mafrterance work. Un
the tire protectio" slystern whIch floon.
tro!s, permission to shut down thr af.
Pezed t7re pr-34eciton syscem rr�ujlt be
*�.Iained the proper
and allpersonetel Uhomay be affected
by gh'*'3 ac"on mu.-t be nor-'ried.
It is racon)m.anejed that automatic
Sprinkler systems �e inspected quaf-
torly by a qva�lfied Irispection Service.
AroVes
recommendfd that (At, piping
conri-ecred to dr
.y Acrjzorttal eidewail
J.PKnkle.'s bf perj,')d.'cq!"Y Checked to
arsure 'Ac4p,-operpWA, aaddroinage
is Ln ecco,-dance wick the m4nimurn
requiremcnes of the �NatiDrial Firt
Protecu'on Assoc.,ij.,�ort, ifth?,pipingis
subjeoct I.i freezing temperaiums, _.
A V�At i7ole is provided in tAe Bult,
Seat Mef Figure A) to indicale that
tk�e DrY Hofizontal SidtwaU Sprink,,
ler is remaining dry. rVdence of leak-
age from this ��rt-'Ka!e is at, indica.
tion Owe !A.rre may be two,?page paq
the 0-Ring Sect ard, theref6re, itiacin
indication t,hat theiipriahler j�iust be
rifm,ovad,llor d0ermfning Me cauee of
leakage an improper installation
Or an iCC PILg), 'The ire PICLECtiort
-qY3t1VY'- tonf--ol ualve rrusi be crosed
2nd !he ryseern &nired t�eforf remov.
ing the spriAkler'
�Seller warrants for a pedod of one year
ffo:,n thti dal.e of sh;pment (warranty
P-1 ricd ' � that the voduc!s fvrrished
hiiicelumdee will be firee from defects In
nnalter!al and workmimship.
For furMer on Warranty, see
Price List,
425-48-7-50?7 ADVRNCED FIRE PROT.
8% P02 !U- 19 120 1.0-56
PSN 60 - XXX - x - xxx
RATING
950 135*F/57'C
psi -1 ISS*F i6e*0
SPRINKLER ESCUTCW� �'I P�ATE
FINISH FiNiSH
0 CHROME PLATED WHITE PAINTED
I NATURAL BRASS WHITE PAINTED
9 CHROME PLATED CHROME PLATED
�1480
025
080
180
16S
47S
*S* QA0ER LE(4crH
!NCHES DECIMAL
(FOR EXAM PtE)
Z31
8.01
1310,
4&0'
TABLE 8
PRODUCT SYM86L NUMBER SELECTION'
FOR MODEL F96010-48 EC DAY HORIZONTAL SIDEWALL SPRINKLERS WITH STANDARD ESCUTCHEON PLATES
Mod6l F960/0-4(3 EC Dry Horizontal
Sidewall Sprinklers are furnished
based upon *Ordered Lengths' as
measured from the face of the wall to
the face of the fitting in which' the indi.
vidual sponkler is to be installed (refer
"' "'U'e A). After the measured length
is taken, round the measurement up or
down to the nearest V2 inch increment
from 2-1/2 to 48 inches. Orders must
include the description and Product
Symbol Numbers.
Sprinklers,
Specify; (:emperature rating) Model
F960/0-48 EC On/ Horizontal Sidewall
Sprinkler with (specify type) finish
Sprinkler and (specify type) finish
Standard Escutcheon Plate and "S*
Order Length of (specify) inches, PSN
(specify from Table B),
Contact your local disL-ibutor for avail.
ability.
Replaoement Parts -
To order a replacement for the outer
P 'ece of the Escutcheon Plate, specify
i
description and for use with Model
F960/0-48 EC Dry Horizonlal Skiewali
7
S Inkler. and Product Symbol Num.
be'rr (PSN). A replacement inner piece
f,jr the Escutcheon Plate is not avail?
able.
Chtome Plated
OW61 Piece for
Pla" PSN 56-960-9-007
Palmed Whits
Outer Piece for
P9601"
Standard
esculcheo-1
P1416 ................. PSN 56-9450,0-W
e Ae&tered irademark of GRINNELL CORPORATION. 3 TYCO PARK, EXETER. NH 01833
There is a patent pending concerning
certa!n features of the Model
F96010-48 EC Dry Horizontal Sidewall
Sprinklers,
LLL..00NVEASI0N,FACT0flS
Parenthetical metric conversion fac-
tors cited herelin are approximate,
I rich 2S.400 MM
1 ft.!b. 1.3$6 Nm
UrIsh, Barbara
M--,-
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Westfall, John
Thursday, March 09, 2000 4:55 PM
Bullis, Ann; Smith, Mike; Saterlie, Jerry
Graf, Jeannine; Eyrish, Barbara
Oly vista condos 239 4th S
I became aware of a potential situation which I have passed to Ron Johnson, architect for the project.
Each unit has a small (W x W) elevator lobby to the unit's front entrance. UBC 3002 says Elevator lobbies shall have at
least one means of egress which shall not require keys, tools, or special knowledge. This means that the front door
hardware shall riot include any lociting devices.
Mark of American Elevator tells me that card readers or keys may be used at the elevator panel (in the elevator) witich
would provide exclusive access to an individual elevator lobby/dwelling unit.
MEMORANDUM
DATE
REPORTED BY 4A , r-6 OF
SUBJECT
ADDRESS:
CONCERNS/
HAZARDS: GAAT-Yf C�r /V 7-
SIGNED
FoLLow-up:
L,&-ct,
/Lt Lljjs 7- )44-t�
0-,c- r�� (9",L
SIGNED
I.D.
City of Edmonds Sb Fire Prevention Bureau
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
01/20/2000
File
Mike Smith, Fire Inspector
,Pd��rest/m239 4' Ave S
Contacted Ron Johnson for a hydro and flush on the fire line. Both tests
were accepted. Testing done per NFPA 24.
Ron will fax the certification.
City of Edmonds Fire Department
MEMORANDUM
4 1
Date: October 22, 1999
To: Building Department
From: John Westfall, Fire Marshal
Subject: Plan Check #99-313: Olympic Vista 6 Unit 239 4" Ave S.
The Fire Department has the following comments/corrections for plans:
1 . Building requires LIBC Standard 9-3 sprinkler system. ECDC 19.75.075
2. Residential or quick -response standard heads shall be used in all dwelling units.
97 UFC 1003.2.9
3. LIBC Standard 9-1 system is required in all S-3 and U-1 occupancies greater than
500 square feet ("outside dwelling units"), areas of R-1 occupancies with 5 or more
units. Floor to ceiling space of attached U-1 and S-3 compartments which are
unheated shall be of adequate height to accommodate upright heads for a dry -pipe
sprinkler system; dry pendant heads; or provide sufficient insulation to maintain 40
degrees F. for a wet -pipe sprinkler system. UBC Standard 9-1 4-6.4
4. Make submittals for fire sprinkler system installation permit. Provide three copies of
plans, hydraulic calculations and specifications for pipe, sprinklers, hangers, and
system appurtenances for review. 97 UFC 1001.3
5. All sprinkler work shall be performed by a contractor licensed for servicing and
installing sprinkler systems. Provide evidence of Washington State underground
and sprinkler contractor license for installation of underground sprinkler water supply
and automatic sprinkler systems, as applicable. RCW 18.160.070
6. Location of FDC shall be approved.
7. Provide submittal for manual and automatic fire alarm system installation permit.
Include three copies of plans, battery calculations and specifications for all
equipment, including magnetic holds, for review. 97 UFC 1001.3
8. Fire alarm design and installation shall be per LIFC 1007.2.12.10 (WAC 51-44 UFC),
UFC 1007.3 and UFC Standards,10-2.
9. All valves controlling the water s.upply for automatic sprinkler system shall be
automatically transmitted to an approved remote location. Fire -protection system is
required to be electrically monitored by an approved central station, remote station,
or proprietary monitoring station. Provide evidence of fire -protection monitoring.
97 UFC 1003.3.1
10. Provide tie-in sprinkler water flow to building fire alarm system to alert building
occupants. 97 UFC 1003.3.2
11. Provide 2A: 1 OB:C rated portable dry -chemical fire extinguishers per U FC Standard
10-1.
12. Sht A6 &.A7 Additional elevator doors shall be "readily openable from the car side
without a key, tool, or special knowledge or effort." UBC Section 3003.5
City of Edmonds Sb Office of Fire Marshal
13. Misc. Note #9 applies only to exit doors within individual dwellings. 97 UFC 1207.3
14. Sht E3 Delete exit signs inside dwellings.
15. Sht E2 Relocate exit signs to exterior exit balcony.
16. Sht E2 & E3 Add 110 VDC smoke detector in dens (typ.).
cc: Ron Johnson, fax 206 546-2288
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 10/22/1999 17:36
NAME
FAX
TEL
DATEJIME
10/22 17:34
FAX NO./NAME
92065462288
DURATION
00:01:16
PAGE(S)
02
RESULT
OK
MODE
STANDARD
City of Edmonds
PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
BUILDING DIVISION
DATE September 24, 1999
TO: Ron Johnson
19601 23rd NW
Shoreline, WA 98177
FROM: Ann Bullis, Plans ExaminerAO_
RECEIVED
OCT 12 1999
RE: Building Permit Plan Check #99-313
During review of the above noted project, it was found that the following information,
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR,
orrecti&W, Wr EDMONDS
clarifications are needed. Structural review under separate cover by WJA.*
-1-1
GENERAL
1) Provide soils report in accordance with UBC 1804
NON-STRUCTURAL
Plans call out this to be a 2-story structure with basement. Clearly show on the elevations that the
A�. ground floor meets the requirements of UBC 220 to be considered a basement (see enclosed
diagram). If the ground floor is considered a story (and not a basement) a complying 2nd exit(p) will
be required from the upper floor. UBC 220 and 1004.2.3.2
UBC 302.4 exception 3 dods not apply to Rl/TJ1 occupancies (only R31Ul). A complete 1-hour
occupancy separation is required between the Ul garage and R1 dwellings. (Sheet A5 notation)
Provide detail of required 1 -hour party wall separating units from common areas, including listed
and tested assembly with an STC rating of 50 or more. UBC Appendix Chapter 12 Division II
Provide details for I -hour fire resistive assemblies for protection of beams and columns, including
listed and tested assemblies'. Nb,
J )5, Provide detail of 1 -hour occupancy separation/stair enclosuri between garage and stair enclosures,
ss including listed and tested assembly. W"t (41J� (A(Nb ftk� AV&AtLq t4�W SAVIG ftf-UL0 4F SWAA
�IXWNI_l Provide general notes and details regarding through -penetration and membrane -penetration
twu requirements of walls, flodr-ceiling, and roof -ceiling assemblies. UBC 709, 710, 714
Decks must also be of I -hour fire resistive fionstruction. Provide construction details showing
protection assemblies. &OOL K uwwmbfs.
�0� On ground floor plan (Sheet A5), the area labeled "lobby" resembles. a hallway more than a lobby.
Please relabel "hallway" to omit confusion.
?�Provide section detail of elevator shaft showing continuous wall construction throughout shaft,
including blocking the full width of the shaft walls at the floor -ceiling and roof -ceiling. UBC 711.2
IV, Stairways penetrate more than one floor and must be completely enclosed in a continuous I -hour
shaft in accordance with UBC 1005.3.3, including I -hour door assemblies. Another option is to
make both stairs meet the requirements of exterior stairways (UBC 1006.3.3. 1).
The exterior exit balcony on the 2nd floor must meet the requirements of UBC 1006.3.2 for width,
openness, and construction. Clearly show on plans how these requirements will be met.
(4 VkProvide general note that I -hour fire rated doors must meet LJBC Standard 7-2 and bear an approved
label containing identification information, with a maximum transmitted temperature of 450'F after
30 minutes of fire exposure.
Provide general note that 20 minute fire rated doors must meet UBC Standard 7-2 and be protected
by tightfitting smoke -and draft -control assemblies and bear an approved label containing
identification information and showing the required 20 minute rating followed by an "S". UBC
1004.3.4.3.2.1
Ae hot water heaters on 1 St floor 011kor electric? Ist floor electric plans show no 220 for HWT, so
zsume gas. Gas hot water tank not permitted in closet opening into sleeping room unless it meets
one of the exceptions in WAC 509.0 (see enclosed). Please also confirm that the'hot water heaters
for the 3rd floor are electric. 4 t S -
I Elevator additional doors must be I -hour rated, self -closing, alarm activated.
Handrail required on both sides of stairways, including exterior stairway. UBC 1003.3.3.6
At each stairway, handrail extensions are required at the top of the stair (12") and at the bottom of
the stair (23"). WAC 1003.3.3.6
Include on the stair detail the handrail height, grippable cross-section, fire blocking, and headroom.
O'Exit sign and emergency lighting locations will be reviewed by the Fire Marshal under separate
cover.
Provide general note calling out flame spread requirements for interior finishes in accordance with
UBC Table 8A & 8B.
Zrovide minimum 3 sq.ft of elevator shaft ventilation. UBC 3004 cftc 0 v
How will dryer ducts be exhausted? Show direction and call out length of Wla.� Lclwp Ceaq
ducts. <:
kt. *�Show all mechanical venting locations. fit, I
Sheet A4-North elevation, call out fence and wall height at west portion of lot.
STATE BARRIER FREE CODE
?�Qetail the following barrier free parking space requirements �n Sheet A5 (see enclosed detail for
reference) WAC 1107.2:
5'-0" painted a�cess aisle.
Accessible path of travel from parking space to building entrance to elevator.
Maximum slope of parking stall and access aisle is 1:48.
��,40,Parking sign location, height, and content
754ccessible path of travel required from the public sidewalk to the main building entrance. The site
plan calls out 1: 12 (8.33%)'maximum slope of the walkway and the plan elevations show
approximately 6.59% slope, which requires handrails on both sides of the ramp. WAC 1103.2.2
peo :*3rovide area of evacuation assistance in accordance, with WAC 1104.
AS-KiCitchen in Unit 102 must meet the requirements of WAC 1106.27.1 #2. KW.
&tY.)3Q_Dimension maneuvering clearance at the main entrance to the building.. WAC 1106.10.3
Please resubmit 2 copies of revised plan sheets/dotuments and written responses to corrections to a
Development Services Technician.
4 QW(A.,
kl� Pot NL -
Pre Application Meetina
May 19,1999 — 1:30 pm
Applicant: Olympic Vista
Site Address: 239 — 4h Ave. So.
6 Unit Condo
Attending: Representing Cily Staff.- Ray Miller, Gordy Hyde, Jeannine Graf, Kate
'Galloway, John Westfall, Conni Curtis
Representing Applicant: Dawn Runyon, Bruce Hall, Ron Johnson
Planning: (Kate)
Kate indicated that she would need a full site plan, elevations, and landscaping plan.
To meet parking there is a need for two stalls for every unit created. No more than
45% lot coverage. Maximum height 25', unless you do a pitch, then you can
go up to 30'. Setbacks are 15' from the street, 10' from the side, 15' from the rear.
ADB review is required. If the building footprint is over 4,000 square feet, SEPA
will be required. The applicant inquired whether the 25'height requirement had
changed in the past few years, and expressed surprise that Kate was asking for
landscape plans. Kate said she had little to go on, just a footprint of the first floor.
She said she couldn't do a review without a little more information. The applicant
said he didn't understand what the pre-app was for. He felt he was providing
setbacks, site, parking, footprint, and lot coverage. Landscaping would come, but he
didn't want to do a landscaping plan if the initial building plan needs work. Kate said
parking site requirements had been met. Applicant asked for parking size, and Kate
referred the discussion to Gordy. Kate can only supply total numbers. Applicant
asked if landscaping was required in the back by the alley. Kate said landscaping is
required around perimeter of all parking areas, so applicant would be required to
provide for stalls 13 and 10. Minimum width off alley is 10 feet. Applicant asked if
it has always been 10 feet. Gordy explained that this is the reason for a pre-app.
meeting. ' The City reviews the information provided and gives the applicant the
information they need to make the project go forward. With a site plan, Kate could
see how wide the alley is. Because what was provided is limited, Kate was unable to
tell where the end of the building was. Applicant said it was covered parking. Gordy
asked if that meant the cover went all the way to the alley? Kate confirmed that
parking requires a 10 foot buffer, and that had not been amended in recent years.
Applicant clarified that the buffer from alley to the first parking stalls would need to
be 10 feet and asked if Kate thought the ADB would be willing to work with that.
Kate has not seen an application different from code go to ADB, so she didn't know
how they would react. From her previous projects, she feels ADB is strong on
landscaping. Applicant asked if a set of stairs could be raised up since lot coverage is
at maximum. Kate said typical lot coverage refers to the building itself, so she didn't
think stairs on grade would be counted against lot coverage. Applicant asked if he
put a rockery around it, would that be seen as an artificial offset to lot coverage?
Kate is concerned onlywith the building. One of the applicants pointed out that in
the past if he's had anything above 30 inches in grade, it has been counted as part of
the structure. Applicant said the stairs -were at grade, but a handrail would be higher
than 30". Applicant wants to build up the grade to help with lot coverage and
setback. They want to raise it artificially with rockeries -- does the City see a
problem with that in terms of lot coverage, setbacks? Kate said lot coverage was not
an issue, but setbacks could be. Ray said Kate could research it more and get back to
them on those issues. Applicant asked that Kate find out if a handrail would be
considered in a setback. Applicant was asked if the fences (half wall with wrought
iron fence on top) would be an issue in terms of setbacks. Kate said that in 1993 the
fence regulations were changed. If a fence is over three feet high within a setback,
you need to get a fence permit. Applicant asked Gordy how landscapes within
buffers evolved. Gordy said the Planning Dept. informs him if landscaping is
required, but acknowledged that zoning impacts the need for landscaping. The
applicant asked if the ADB had the authority to waive that requirement. Kate said
ADB may not waive the requirement, but may be able to modify it. Gordy said other
condos on that narrow alley did not have landscaping, and he didn't know if they
were built before the code was in effect. Dawn said since more parking was being
provided than required, maybe the landscaping could be modified. Ray says it all
depends on what the code requires. Applicant said they might ask ADB for such
consideration. Kate agreed to research parking requirements up to lot lines/setibacks.
Engineering: (Gordy)
• Had not had a chance to review plans before, but will give general comments.
• Minimum parking stall size is 8 Y2'x 16 1/2'
13' x 18' total for handicapped accessible
Drive by width is 24'. Posts Will not count in space size. Thinner opening (16 or 18)
is fine by overhead door.
Will require alley to be inspected, may require overlay
Drainage requirements will need to be met with 30/13 (water quality for outside
parking areas and detention for all impervious systems). Will need a professional
engineer to design site. If you drain into a stream, requirements are different.
Sideyard setbacks for undergound water detention are 10', which might be tight for
this site.
0 Six or seven years ago a water line was put in on 4h Ave. and any future development
on 4h Ave. requires a payback to that developer, which is Bruce. Based on front
footage.
0 Potential of SEPA traffic fee, approximately $400 unless something drastic comes up
that he is not aware of.
0 7 feet of height required throughout entire depth, so stairwells may cut'into that. You
may need to look at that.
0 Need to look at civil engineering site plan that will show storm drainage and how
your utilities will connect. A garage is typically connected to a floor drain and
sanitary sewer, often a trench drain to detention. Applicant showed some water
drainage paths from earlier projects. Gordy said weep holes in curbs are not
something traditionally allowed so applicant should plan ahead for this project.
0 Need water and fire commitments.
Fire: (John)
• Sprinklers are required throughout for over five units, less modifications to UBC
requirements. Could be a 13R system, UBC903 standard.
• Garage portion will need a 13 system due to size. Sprinkler coverage will be required
to go all the way out underneath the overhang. Applicant asked what cut-off was on
garage size. John informed him it is 400 square feet.
• Fire flow looks good with existing hydrants.
• Manual and auto fire alarms required with full boxes in common areas and garage.
UBC requires a man door as second means of egress in garage other than car doors.
Jeannine will make final determination as to necessity of second means of egress.
Exits will need to be spaced differently than are currently shown.
• Will ask for sprinkler and water flow tie-in and a monitored system. Applicant sets
up contract.
• Elevator measurements are fine as is.
• Fire extinguishers throughout.
• Voluntary lock box system will be requested.
• Applicant had a question about elevator lobby egress. John confirmed that they need
a second egress from elevator lobby where the only egress door is locked. Needs to
be mechanically or electronically coded into elevator so only those with keys to that
locked door can access that floor.
Building: (Jeannine)
• Head room height is very restrictive because it includes any ceiling beam, racks,
cabinets, etc. The fire sprinkler heads cannot encroach into that area.
• Barrier -free parking space should be nearest to an entry/elevator that can be accessed,
especially if there is not a man -door on the garage door. As it is now, there is no
access. Applicant would have to explain to Jeannine's satisfaction why the parking
may not work.
• Man -door is required from the garage to the public way. A garage door does not
qualify as a man -door.
• May want to do an alternate ' design under Section 104 regarding third floor rules.
• Lobbies are required off every elevator unless an additional door is p . rovided.
Meeting concluded.
PREnAPPLICATION. MEETING
Notification & Plans
To:
Building Engineering E] Fire 0 Planning [] Ray Miller
From:
Jana [:] Linda
Date:
May 12, 1999
Meeting Date:
May 19, 1999
Meeting Time:
1:30 - 2:15pm
Applicant:
Olympic Vista
Contact Info:
Bruce Hummel 481-4348
Project:
New'Const. of 6 Unit Condo at 239 e Ave. So.
Pre-App. #
99-0012
I have e-mailed each of you and scheduled this on your calendar. Attached please find the plans for this
meeting.
V/v I
's,
1,3(,'- 6 -
C7
-7F
I A -15
3
2! 7
-2—
'th a,&-fw.
cc: Conni Curtis
-�,/L-o je,� 11v C".A- 146t "A4w
c:preap.preapmtgpacketmemo.doc
6_1
... ... .....
r*cu
_�U(Lo.
---Row uo(o - 4so(o 11
4G*
RECEIVED
-EDMONDS- FIRE--DEPT-