23926 FIRDALE AVE.PDF1111111111 lill
11287
23926 FIRDALE AVE
a
IMPERVI13US SURFACE CALCS, wt 1, 9r, jed' 2.8150
AG,
Proposed Building Roof Outline 1 2,555 sf.
Proposed Main Floor 1 1,641 sf.
Proposed Garage 1 500 sf. 15'
Proposed Driveway 1 659 sf,
Proposed Walkways 1 97 sf,
Proposed Deck 1 83 sf.
Proposed Covered Porch 1 93 sf.
B + 4'
V-61
N+1061 DECK 75'
COVERED
PATIO
%0
CD
HEIGHT CALCS.
B = +104'
C = +102'
D = +103,
AVE. GRADE = la3.75'
ACTUAL GRADE 123.5'
MAXIMUM GRADE 128.75'
LOT COVERAGE 1
LOT AREA
Sj071 SGFT.
Tax Account Parcel #
2703-360-030-4500
LOT SLOPE 1
LESS THAN 5X
1; 1
20'
SCALE 1'=20'
DRAINAGE PLAN
ACCORDING TO
SP 97-009
0
CO
00
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
"6 1641 SO,
CO
%D
Ir-A
c�
CU
A�
ON
CD I
CO '.
z V
hE
PROPOSED
GARAGE
500 SQ.
AM N
7.5' Oru
�i
03
r
0
W +'C = +102'
A
D = +103'
25' DRIVEWAY
CD
CD
Ln
114-
C)
M
CD
<
CD
LLJ m
Zm
U M
CD
E]
CL Oj
-j
Z D:
CD,
CU
LLJ
CD
cc)
U
LLJ
Cf) 7-1 W
C4
00
LL-
Z
)rAX
Li
CD
LJ
Cd
LU
U
0
Lu
z U-
0
Lrua
N:
' '; 00
�:�DATUM POINIT +100'
C)B9
"C"
CB 130' NORTH OF
NJ PROPERTY LINE
LLJ
15' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT ON LOT B
FOR A,B AND C TO FIRDALE AVE, W. '(4�
I
I
I
I
Airm
se"
10 4-
9-�- 00�
Janris Construction Lot Infiltration Systems
City of Edmonds
Parcels # 27033600604300
27033600604400
27033600604500
Technical Information Report
RECEIVED
MAR 0 4 2002 STREFT FILE Project Site:
PERMIT COUNTER 239xx Firdale Ave W
Edmonds, WA 98020
J AL
to i
February 22, 2002
0.
J
w Prepared for
Paul Thompson
Jands Construction
15028 - 228th St SE
793& Snohomish, WA 98296
01 0 (4215) 424.3,08
XPAES w o
Deelon Build 5ervicao, Itic.
Enoinecring & Construction Mana0ernent Phone /Fax: (560) 793-9659
E-mall: rholdegoharactafflnk.net
Janris Construction
Technical Information Report
Table of Contents
1. Project Overview
p 3
2. Conditions and Requirements Summary
p 3
3. Off -Site Analysis
p 3
4. Retention/Detention Analysis and Design
p 3
5. Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design
p 4
6. Special Reports and Studies
p 4
7. Other Permits
p 4
8. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Design
p 4
.9. Bond Quantities Worksheet, Retention/Detention Facility
p 4
Summary Sheet, and Declaration of Covenant
10. Maintenance and Operations Manual
p 4
List of Figures
Figure 1 TIR Worksheet
Figure 2 Site Location
1. Project Overview
This project consists of three new SFR's and associated walk and driveways being
built on three 8,000 s.f. lots created as a short plat in the late 90's. The plat concept
was for a detention pipe discharging to the Firdale drainage system. As the site is
underlain by a deep deposit of Everett soils, the new impervious is being infiltrated in
accordance with the King County Design manual that states that all lots on outwash
soils shall be evaluated and if feasible infiltrated. The total proposed new impervious
is 10,871 s.f. for all three lots. A TIR Worksheet is attached as Figure 1 and a site
vicinity map is attached as Figure 2.
2. Preliminary Conditions Summary
The site is in the City of Edmonds and bounded by 1001 Ave W and Firdale Ave W.
The site is underlain by Everett soils.
3. Off -Site Analysis
All flows will be infiltrated. Any overflow of the system will flow in the same drainage
path as it does now to the system along Firdale as originally proposed by the short
plat.
In summary the off -site topographical and vegetative conditions suggest no unusual
drainage or erosion problems.
4. Retention/Detention/Water Quality Analysis and Design
No off -site flows are coming on -site within the area of development. On site flows
are being infiltrated in infiltration trenches. The 98KCSWDM requires residential
sites with less than 22,000 s.f. to be evaluated for infiltration.
The site was evaluated using three soil log holes and three infiltration tests. The
tests showed the soils to be course sand and gravel draining much in excess of the
maximum design rate of 20 in/hr. All holes drained within 5 minutes and could not
actually be kept filled. No mottling or evidence of water was observed in any of the
holes to 4' depth.
The roof downspouts are going to infiltration trenches and the drive runoff is being
sheet flowed to a separate catch basin and infiltration system for each lot. These are
shown on the attached site,grg�qg_pja!1s.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
5. Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design
The only conveyance is by 4" PVC as directed in the KCSVVFDM required downspout
infiltration details.
6. Special Reports and Studies
No special reports are required.
7. Other Permits
No other permits are required.
8. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Design
.Silt fence had been provided on the design drawing downstream of any proposed
disturbance.
The required construction entrance is shown on the plan.
9. Bond Quantities Worksheet,
Facility Summaries, and Declaration of Covenant
A Bond Quantities Worksheet is not required for a small site Appendix C application.
No covenant is required.
10. Maintenance and Operations Manual
Not required.
4
List of Figures
Figure 1 TIR Worksheet
Figure 2 Site Location
5
m
King County Department of Development and. Environmental Services
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
N
-,:,P,-RQJEC,-,ZQW E9�ANIP,
.P
ROOM' JENGIF4EER�
P_mject Owner
Address
Phone
Project Engineer
Company----�
,a�...,PROJECT,L-0
-OX M-N
� Project Name
ILocation
Township
Range
............. Section
Subdivison DFW HPA
Short Subdivision COE 404
Grading DOE Dam Safety
Commercial FEMA Roodplain
Othej-- COE Wetlands
"PaitS 'S C64M A DRAINAGE-BASItC'
UNITY—N
community
Drainage Basin
Shoreline Management
Rockery
Structural Vauft
Other
F��16`: SJTE-'C 1��
River
Floodplain
Wetlands
Stream
Seeps/Springs
critical stream Reach
Depressions/Swalles
High Groundwater Table
-Recharge
Groundwater
Lake
Other
Steep Slopes
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION
AFTER CONSIR ON
Sedimentation Facifid
i'lze Exposed Surface
tabilize Exposed Surface
Stabi iz onstruction Entrance
Remove and Restore Temporary ESC D�Facilrlrtdles
Perimeter Runoff Control
11
ean em veA S it and D bris
Clean and Remove All Sift and Debris
R
(En
Cj�egg* riazadLG raing Restrictions
r Ities
ent ir
Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities
re a of
�Cove�r'Omct�ices
s of S 0 ope sp 8
Flagg SAO and open space
preservation areas.
Construction Sequence
Other
Other
EW, T r SrWII
'S -A-, -EF:S# J,`
C
Method of Analysis
Grass Uned Tank
infiltration
Channel Vault
epression
Compensation/Mitgati
Pipe System
Energy Dissapator
Flow Dispersal
on of Eliminated Site
Open Channel Wetland
Waiver
Storage
Dry Pond Stream
Regional
Wet Pond
Detention
Brief Description of System Operation
Facility Related Site Umitations
Reference Facility Limitation
-A(A
"UC jj �Sje-. TSYTRACTS*
--1S.T-;R T. f Wt_%ANA --y. V.EASEMER
L
Cast in Place Vault Drainage Easement
Retaining Wall Access EasemerTt
Native Growth Protection Easement
Rockery > 4! High
Other I I Other
I
R SSIONAL; GINEER'.
. E-:0 -E EN
�.SIGNAETIU F-PROF
I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site
conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of
my knowledge the information provided here is accurate.
I-V 0"7—
I
3 kk
oeif
00
00
(0
GRADING CALM
SECTION I
AVM CUT 10F 2.5'
CUBIC YARIS BUI
SECTION It 3
AVa CUT OF 3-5'
CUBIC YARDS - IM74
T11TAL CUBIC YARDS
ldmffqm�
�
N
NMAT
LOT CCIVERAGE
3,073 S"T. C38Z)
LOT AREA 1
8,071 SQ,FT.
Tax Account P*Met 0 1
Z703-%"3D-45013
LOT SL13PE
LESS THAN 5%
of 20A
-
San
SCALE I"=20'
DRAINAGE PLAN
ACCORDING TO
SP 97-009
z
..4
n
0 -
to a ewse \4 ,
SE
DIRT
75� TOCK PIL
-7 16,
0, 7.5'
SECTION 11
�3' /
l\ N
C:)
CD
CD
—J 4,0
t1i (y)
U (y)
C)
CL w —J
.z :�c C:)
0 cu
W Cj
> 00
<
W
V)
LL-
0
w
w 0i
i
<
U
RIVEWAYI.W= %In- w WAAMW OD
C.O. cuma.
CWfiftLFW SML WWUN UW02P r1walmmm DOW=
mutm Dc cW=mTmla Wj=L
LD
G
z
DATUM Of NT 416W
9 CD 130' t IM [IF
PRMPRTY LIM
b5 <
0� —i -U
15' DRIVI-VAY EASCMENT ON LOT B
FOR A AND C TO FIRDALE AVE. W.
PREIPOSED
RESIDENCE
CTIEW I
19'
fu
p
M QI
fu
va
/.,I-
rILTcR rho=
SEEMED M
14 G#L WME I C
EDUOL
X L- VWB OR_
tal
Ir
eLAM 3/4--1.9'.WAUD MAVEL I"
THE TREWN MR a" RMH SIDES ar
rELTER FAMUC MCC 09 THE suirAm
34o
C)
.3
Z
cr
ILD
(s)
cm
to
Im
N
C0
(s)
87,41
SE LBA.
pgs
C)
PEI
Gf
I
W
C)
#w
BIRT
(y)
'r
SCALE 1'=20' 7
3CK PIL
27.5'
r-%
ffl
u
(n
c?
f
LOT CaVERAGE I Tax Ac:ccunt-Pckrcek-# (U Lj
LL 3,810 SGLFT, 07%) E703-360-M-4400 sEciall" rl M'
0 140 z
LOT ARE A L LEFT SLOPE DRAINAGE PLAN PREPOSES
cu
ACCORDING TO RESIVENCE
9,058 SUFT. LESS T14AN 5X 'Q� 'em- - - -
SP 97-009 t-- > co
Q
FILTER FABRIC ------ % SECTION I
SECLarp to e x -- \' Lj
(1) t4 64. VIRE %illic
0) _j
ko COUAL
P- 0
OD Z
L" VC
14'
37' M
U 1-4
L 22, 7.5' Lj-
z
12, AY
C z
w
z
7, Lij
000
PLACE 3,14-W-VASHED MVEL Itl
0 1
THE TRENCH AND ON MTH SIMS IF co
FILTER FARM 'EKCE ON THE 3LW-CE- C4
ale
00,
t
'o D
2T
ev 04. met's
Ln
>- Vol
Ln
,,'Cos
CE DATUM PMKT t101Y
Lo
'JAY CA 6W NORTH OF z
PRaP RTY LINE
f'v
0 J)
"WISC FUL WPM W VIV=V
cz%r= ME,
a- 15' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT ON LOT B
L3
'..Nw
"Uuon
FOR A,B AND C TO FIRDALE AVE. W.
-A
C)
Q�
IJL
C)
C)
GRMNG, CALM* (v)
64.00-
AY6.: -CUT -13F 2' �13�911,
03 i
epsX.YARDS i= 6674 (y)
Of 2,0s 15,
SECT1q0-*.U-,I_ 15' U.
tre_
.'AVG. CUT 'Ur el —1 0
(:tji SET ACKS LLJ M :#
, 11C YMPS - eats
TUtAL tkWIG YARDS - 94S9 SCALE 1*=20 ]DIRT co
C�
UCK P1 C:)
'LUT 60VERAGE Tax Account PQrce[D (7
.5, CU
2,986 SQFT. (37%) 2703-360-030-4300 7
LU_
LaT AREA T SLUPE z C:)
.39.rl. LESS THAN 545' C3 0i
CD
511\10_�e All c > co
U
:MlElt FARRM PROPMD
:SECuRED TO T
2
t4 GA. W111C .61RIC RESIDE7 La
EMAL S",r f, 0 34f. 34".
%a _j <E
SEURON I I C� 0. < D:
a, wulin OR Cjt r z
EQUIVALENT b-e r::1
dp% z 0 W
(*r<41 U 14
LL_
111RIC
" OR
_C_T
Y-S 6' W 0
01- W it, eel S5 z
Jr tA ctj 7.5' SECTION U
77 1, - 4h
17, A K
w Y Qj,.4),j vv1q
jor _j
PLACE 3141-V51. WASHED GRAVEL IN
THE TREACM AMD ON BOTH SIDES Of
FILTER FAMUC FEKE ON INE URFACE
C:)
Y Ld (U
MINE
U
rv�& —0% KAr. EpisEw"'T
14
. .......... S110E ALK
E3
it 989'
61.9 UATL94 FOMT
CATC14 BWK +1W L3
z
-DRAINAGE PLAN
p:1 z
ACCORDING TO
15' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT ON LOT B
KPAn MUSTRMIM 64r� SP 97�009
P .1", "m 2, "L
FOR A,B AND.'C,... FIRDALE AVE. W.
- - ---------
5. 1.1 DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION SYSTEMS
FIGURE 5.1.1A TYPICAL DOWNSPOUT.RVILTRATION SYSTEM
roof
ni A KI VICIA1 F Idnauln
NTS 4" rigid or 6" flexible
perforated pipe
...................................................
infiltration trench
PLAN VIEW
NTS
overflow
,C rigid or 6' flexible splash block
perforated pipe
. . . . ...... ......................................
60
; ------- -----------------------
CA 46 CA 4
to Ci washed rock C'* 'C 11
12- 1 1120-3/e &COO
76.
...... .............
... ............ fine mesh s
�— 4 varies —.1-:1 10'min
filter fabric —
i
6*
Ze
12*
sump w/solid lid
roof drain
So
CB'sump w/solid lid
compacted backfill
e rigid or 6* flexible
770 7
perforated pipe
60
6 0 7 0
7* 2 a
7 000 7 C1
washed rock
C,*
112"-31,V
AN
SECTION A
NTS
1998 Surface Water Design Manual 5-7 9/1198
SECnON 5.1 ROOF DOWNSPOUT CONTROLS
FIGURE S.LLB
ALTERNATIVE DOWNSPOUT INFMTRATION SYSTEM FOR COAR SAND AND Gr=.RAVEL
from roof
grass
-overflow 6' min
11__�_
1 11t - 31e
washed rock
0 a
47
0 a a C'*
000 *a.
NOTE: Same length dimensions
*system
4
7
min
and site limitations as typical
CA
L2! min
15'min
NTS
9/1/98 5-8 1998 Surface Water Design Manual
rl
Cf) W (A
LU
WLUW
cs
xxx
(n Cl) (A
coo
LO 0 0
CM
CM "Cr
c:j
N N N
(?Yo Lma��
KA 1�5-. 4.
iD %-k.S
VV\
quo
5r k\Lf f�—V—
aT 00i
LO
0
LOT # A = 9,071 SF
SFR
I V�r-
SCALE 11-M'
UIT 1 8 + G.OW SF
LEIT 0 C - 8,016 SF
E S.PR
so HOUSE
1 1643 SO
VEWAY
q*-.f 01 le—
W
c
14otF
I
5. 1.1 DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION SYSTEMS
5.1.1 DOWNSPOUT ROUTRATION SYSTEMS
ating runoff from roof
Downspout infiltration systems are trench systems intended only for use in infiltr;
downspout drains. They are not designed to directly infiltrate surface water that could transport sediment
or pollutants, such as from paved areas.
0 BASIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Single family subdivision projects subject to Core Requirement #3 must provide for individual
downspout infilwation systems on all lots smaller than 22,000 square feet if feasible.
2. The feasibility or applicability of downspout infiltration must be evaluated for all subdivision single
family lots smaller than 22,000 square feet. The evaluation procedure detailed below shall be used to
determine if downspout infiltration is feasible or whether downspout dispersion can be used in lieu of
infiltration. This procedure shall also be used to evaluate all projects proposing to apply roof
downspout controls as flow control BM?s per Section 5.2.
3. For subdivision single family lots greater than or equal to 22,000 square feet, downspout infiltration is
optional, and the evaluation procedure detailed below is only required if downspout infiltration is
being proposed voluntarily. Note: If downspout infiltration is not required or provided on these lots,
then a downspout dispersion system must be provided per Section 5.1.2 (p. 5-9).
C3 PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING FEASIBILITY
1 . A soils report must be prepared by a geotechnical engineer. The report must reference a sufficient
number of soils logs to establish the type and limits of soils on the project site. The report should at a
minimum identify the limits of any outwash type soils (i.e., those meeting USDA soil texture . classes
ranging from coarse sand and cobbles to medium sand) versus other soil types.
2. On lots or sites with no outwash type soils, a downspout dispersion system per Section 5.1.2
-(p. SAY) may be used 1-LHievvf-inffl o quali4
control sizing credits, it must be shown to be feasible as described below. testin
3. On lots or sites containing outwash type soils (coarse to medium sand), additional site -specific 9
must be done. Individual lot or site tests shall consist of at least one soils log, a minimum of 4 feet in
depth (from proposed grade), identifying the SCS series of the soil and the USDA textural class of the
soil horizon through the depth of the log, and noting any evidence of high groundwater level, such as
mottling. Note: 77tis testing is also required on lots or sites where downspout infiltration is being
proposed in soils other than outwash.
4. If site -specific tests indicate less than 3 feet of permeable soil to the seasonal high groundwater
table, then a downspout dispersion system per Section 5.1.2 may be used in lieu of infiltration. If
downspout infiltration is still desired to qualify for flow control sizing credits, the minimum 3-foot
depth to groundwater may be met by using fill material as allowed in the design criteria below.
5. On lots or sites with more than 3 feet of permeable soil to the seasonal high groundwater table, d the
downspout infiltration is considered feasible and mandatory if the soils are outwash type soils an
infiltration trench can be designed to meet the minimum design criteria specified below. Voluntary
provision of downspout infiltration must also meet these design criteria in order to be approved as
feasible.
E3 DESIGN CRITERIA
Figure 5. 1. 1 A (p. 5-7) shows a typical downspout infiltration system, and Figure 5. 1. 13 (p. 5-8)
-presents,an-alternadyik ils. These systems shall
be designed as specified below.
9/l/98
1998 Surface Water Design Manual
F
SE=ON 5.1 ROOF DOWNSPOUT CONTROLS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General
1. Downspout infiltration trenches shall be the following minimum lengths (linear feet) per 1,000
square feet of roof area based on soil type:
Coarse sands and cobbles: 20 LF
Medium sand: 30 LF
Fine sand, loamy sand 75 LF
Sandyloam 125 LF
Loam 190 LF
2. Maximum length of trench shall not exceed 100 feet from the inlet sump-
3. Minimum spacing between trench center lines shall be 6 feet.
4. Filter fabric shall be placed over the drain rock prior to backfilling.
5. Infiltration trenches may be placed in fill material if the fill is placed and compacted under the
supervision of a geotechnical engineer, and if the measured infiltration rate is at least 8 inches per
hour. Trench length in fill shall be 60 linear feet per 1,000 square feet of roof area. hifiltration rates
shall be tested using the methods described in Section 5.4.1 (p. 5-53).
6. Infiltration trenches are not allowed on slopes steeper than 25 % (4: 1). A geotechnical analysis and
report may be required on slopes over 15% or if located within 200 feet of the top of steep slope or
landslide hazard area
7. Trenches may be located under pavement if a small yard drain or catch basin with grate cover is
placed at the end of the trench pipe such that overflow would occur out of the catch basin at an
elevation at least one foot below that of the pavement, and in a location which can accommodate the
overflow without creating a significant adverse impact per Core Requirement #1 (see Section 1.2.1).
Intent: To -preyent saturation of the pavement subgrade in the event of system failure.
Setbacks
I . All trenches must be at least 5 feet from any structure, property line, or sensitive area (except steep
slopes).
2. 'An trenches must be at least 50 feet from any sensitive area steep slope. This setback may be
reduced to 15 feet based on a geotechnical evaluation, but in no instances may it be less than the
buffer width.
3. For sites with septic systems, infiltration trenches must be downgradient of the drainfield. This
requirement may be waived if site topography clearly prohibits subsurface flows from intersecting the
drainfield.
Documentation Requirements
1'. The approved plans for single family subdivision projects must show infiltration trench details and
the approximate location and size of each proposed downspout infiltration system and septic system
(if applicable). Alternatively, details of representative lots may be provided to depict approximate
locations of downspout infiltration systems and septic systems (if applicable).
2. If the proposed project is a subdivision, the following note conditioning single family residential
building permits on compliance with the approved infila-ation systems shall be recorded with the plat
or short plar
"Single family de
Pylis subdivision must proyi downspout
infiltration systems according to the details shown on the approved plans."
9/1/98 5-6 1998 Surface Water Design Manual
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCS.
Proposed Building Roof Outtime 1 2,555 s
Proposed Main Floor 1 1,641 sf.
Proposed Garage 1 500 sf.
Proposed Driveway 1 659 sf.
Proposed Walkways 1 97 sf,
Proposed Deck 1 83 sf.
Proposed Covered Porch 1 93 sf,
HEIGHT CALCS.
A = +lU6'
B = +1041
C = +102,
D = +103,
AVE. GRADE = 103,75'
ACTUAL GRADE 123.5'
MAXIMUM GRADE 128.751
Uj
LOT COVERAGE
--j
3,073 SQ.FT, (38%)
LOT AREA i
8,071
SQ,FT.
LJLJ
Tax Account Parcel # i
Uj
2703-360-030-4500
LOT SLOPE
LESS THAN 5%
Cf.)
1/ 20'
SCALE 1'=20'
1p I
C9
2C
Ec-
Uj
Uj
P,
ca
a
W
rc
mm�M 10
JUL 2 6 2002
PERMIT COUNTER
VEWAY FOR LOT A
CD
CD
Ln
CD
M
CD
CD
--j "D
Ld M
U M
Q� CD
<: r--, ED
0- ou __j
Z ��: CD,
ED 0j
W C:D
> Co
U
Li
Z
ED ry
U F-1
C14
ZAJED
P5
N
CD
LLJ
U
LLJ 3:
0 LLJ
F--i >
LLJ Q�
ry. f::� n
. 0
LOT # A = 8,071 SF
S.F.R.
HOUSE
1641 SQ
DRIVEWAY
SCALE 1'=30'
-2-3 412-0
LOT * B = 13,058 SF
S.F.R.
HOUSE
1649 SQ
DRIVE
4) Lli* Av
,j::- I (ZIP
4 M Cu —4 — 0 214 c)
-23910
LOT # C = 8,016 SF
Lu
S.Fj.R.
HOUSE
1643 SQ
(4
cc
I %-
C3
t�z
z
Juz 2 6
COIJ'VrcR
LOT COVERAGE 1
3,073 SGLFT. (38Z)
LOT AREA 1
8,071 SUFT.
Tax Account Parcei # 1
2703-360-030-4500
LOT SLOPE 1
LESS THAN 57
SCALE 1'='
DRAINAGE PLAN
ACCORDING TO
C)
SP 97-009 CU
P,
Co
z
CONTACT OLYMPIC
WATER/SEWER DIE
-B,,5 BE COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS
,4r
*0EFVCONTRACTOR IS RESPONS113LE FOR
EROSION CONTROL AN DRAINAGE
FILTER FAHRIL—\1
L
31,0 SECURED To
WIRE 2-11 f
FARM
14 GA.
rclUAL
'30" 101 e X 2, 'j(JUD Ilp
U —JE:
PLArE 3, WASHED GRAVEL IN
I WHE TREf- �,D [IN BOTH SIDES FIF
FILIF� ((C"--NCE ON THE SWFACE.
00
-CID C-q
IYO
D DRIV W
RIVIW
"J� TK C041MXTMN PERNM
DATUM POINT +100' =35-7 APPROVED AS NOTED
CB 130 NORTH OF
LIO
P 1��RTY LINE
PROPERTr BY WRING
A
15' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT ON
FOR A,B AND C ToDsURDALE
A v E. w. 4
CD
CD
CD
M
CD
CD
M
U M
Q!f CD
< fl- CD
[I- 011 —1
z �3: C:)
0 0j
W CD
> 00
U < (J*,
D
ly- Ld
<F-
1:3
U
Lli
H
CD
LJ
-j
U
0
0
0 CL_
LL,
L)
CC
GRADING CALCS.
SECTION I i
AVG. CUT OF 2.5'
CUBIC YARDS = 86.11
SECTION 11 1
AVG, CUT OF 3.5'
CUBIC YARDS = 139.74
TOTAL CUBIC YARDS = 225.85
0 N
0
CD
CIO
LOT COVERAGE
Z
3,073 SQFT, (38%)
61
LOT AREA
8,071 SQ.FT.
Tax Account Parcel #I
2703-360-030-4500
LOT SLOPE i
LESS THAN 5%
01 20'
knommums
ru 'I
Immmommom
SCALE 1'=20'
DR&6GE PLAN
*CPSIRDING TO
—Q
w '-��77-009
�u
N A9cu
LU
0 0
ca I
_--c -
LU
CO 'I
Z v
CC cc
qr
0
40,9("
/1/- 15'
34o
7f
81 L:
22' 7.5
33' SECTION 11 25'
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
39,
SECTION I
7,5' on
33'
is,
%0
PIL'Te)t-
a It w
0-to, -4. A
0 �5—
:*.n
Date��
FILTER FABRIC -
SECURED To 2' X 2'
14 GA. WIRE FABRIC
EQUAL
2' X 2' WOOD OR
',.1 r OF
35 E3
PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED rRA11L IN
THE TRENCH AND [IN BOTH SIDES OF
FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE.
C/G & SIDEWALK FORM
INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
S�'g — 'R80EPTABLE TIGHTLINE
MATERIAL
SD"
40
12 M' .1. RADWS
WAR I VALU
DEPTH
a- 12,
DRIVWAY FULL VZOTN OF [NGRESS,
AREA
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRLJCT113N ENTRANCE
DURTHS THE CONSTRUCTION PERJOR
vat 1XI DATUM POINT -100' If a A e(94V 10, r
CB 130' NORTH OF rACVv:j79
ia PROPERTY LINE -4 P7% L Ownoj
NJ <4s-Cvj"A tACIA4014% W495S bw
TV 15' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT ON LOT B rbe-ftL
FOR A,B AND C TO FIRDALE AVE, W.
\Oto grz ww*a--*p
CD
(:D
n
CD
C:)
1,D
LJ (y)
U M
CD
I-- CD
CL (1i -i
Z �': CD
LJ CD
> co
U < Gl)
_j <
C4 <
U
LL-
ry%5- E:1
Q- p
CA LLJ
H
0
U
(4
CL
!—W
C=
C�4
= R
U.
I--
ui
Uj
1=
U I k
zi
19
IMPERVI13US SURFACE CALCS,
Proposed BultdIng Roof OutLlne 1 2,555 sf.
Proposed Main Ftoor 1 1,641 sf.
Proposed Garage 1 500 sf.
Proposed Driveway 1 659 sf.
Proposed Walkways 1 97 sf,
Proposed Deck 1 83 sf.
Proposed Covered Porch 1 93 sf.
HEIGHT CALCS.
A = +1061
B = +104'
C = +1021
D = +103,
AVF- GRADE = 103.75'
ACTUAL GRADE 123.5'
MAXIMUM GRADE 128.75'
LOT COVERAGE 1
0 N
00,
CO
z
LOT AREA C%3
S,071 SOFT.
Tax Account Parcel. # 1
2703-360-030-4500
LOT SLOPE 1
LESS THAN 5%
W 20'
SCALE 1'=20'
DRAINAGE PLAN
ACCORDING TO
SP 97-009
'�L
15'
SEVBACY's.
7.5'
� DECX
+106'
PATIO
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
1641 SO,
PROPOSED
GARAGE
500 SO,
B -1 4'
7,5'
V 1%)
ATM N
ON
7.5 oru
z
in
(y
r
%D
w -+C + ' 102'
A �
I
9
I cc
C/) 2—: LU
0 W cc
c<
i= 2 LU
cc 0
0
0 LU Uj
" co =
D +103'
25'
Ll
w
C14
C=
C=)
CA Co
UJ M
() z
—
DRIVEWAY
>
>
cr
cu
CU A�
w
C"
UJ C3
V) UJ
LL
0 ON
0) 1
U
LLJ 0
i—
z
DATUM POINT +100'
w
<
-
0
-1
Uj
CB 130' NORTH OF
>
Uj
0
PROPERTY LINE
Ln
15' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
ON LOT
B
,F,,jt'DA-t
FOR A,B AND C TO FIRDALE
AVE, W,
CD
CD
Ln
114-
CD
CD <
CD
—j ,D
m
CD
r,- El
a- 0i _j
Z D: CD
C�j
LJ CD
> co
U
LLJ
ED ry
U C4
fy E:l
z :E:
<
) (ri"it Lj
c::)
LLJ (�j
U
CL
�LLJ
a a �
UL
UU
Uj
Cr
CP
DATE RECEIVED I
0&- 1 (�� I PERMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER E/NAME OF BUSINESS
rA IP,4 N % s C-3 " S Ta V C-T % 0 �41 -rm
MAILING ADDRESS
MID-21q- 7-1-16
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
451�11* lA3rA % 5 1A . \jVA- G* -�A 6 142.<- Lf 7-4- -�,4+16 9
ADDRESS
CITY ZIP I TELEPHONE
NAME
ICE Y
ADDRESS
USE PERMIT
ZONE -y'
NUMBER;?X2_--6Z3g'
JOB
SUITVAPT#
ADDRESS'on?& y
Wa,9,,tr ii VEL
( -TA)
L10
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
->pot 0 0
A
UD FEE S
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL MEET MAP
TESCP Approved
RW Permit Recluked
Y
Street Use Permit Rscrd
EXISTING PROPOSED
litspection Required
Sidewalk ReWired
REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT
Undargrotmid
whing required 13
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV.REQUIRED
I
1(0
YES NO 13
2�
1
REMARKS
f
z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
A r7lc rN I � . V--VAe — I
INP IL:
CILLL V
I RE REVIEWED BY
CITY
zlo�
TTELjEP�HONE
. 6:111711'. 3a9 0
E, f
VARIAN OR CU.
�'SHORELINE OR,ADB#
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
J'A r4 (ZjC
T�b Z? A
EXPIRATION OAT E
vo v q.-
SEOA REVIEW
:COMPLETE '.EXEMPT
EXP'
SIGN AZREA
7"�
.':,ALLQW D. "PTUO ED,
17k
PROPERTY TAX ACCOI PA C_EV_,:NO.
2-11033C," co 6,q5,,, oo,
If NEW
0 ADDITION
REMODEL
REPAIR
0 DEMOLISH
GARAGE
CARPORT
RESIDENTIAL LUM13ING MECH�
C.11 I PG
COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF,USE
APARTMENT 0 SIGN_
FE NCE—)".1,
RADING C Fr),�, .
YDS 0
13, TANK 0 OTHER
RETAINING WALL
D ROCKERY [3 RENEWAL
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOSED.,
1. -1
REQUIRED sETeAqrs, (Fr.
FRONT SIFE.j,�REAR
7C N/A
PARKING
REQI) PROVIDED
LOT AREA
I P. I Flo
REMARKS
VZ iF
"E OF USE, BUSINESS
OR'ACTIV IT EXPLAIN:
CHECKED BY
ITYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
It
NUMBER
OF
STORIES
NUMBER OF
DWELLING'
UNITS
CRITICAL
A EAS
NRUMBER
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
REQUIRED [:] YES
JAREA
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
_UBC 10 Fil
PROGRESS, INSPECTIONS. PER, a/
h(.A
A�A
151A
T_
It 531D
1�1 ft4
1
?AQJL_�
,vALUATi0N,$
FEE
Dow
*iN&L
DATE
INSPECTION
REQ-0
I PBOND
OSTED
[3 YES 13 NO
1�� HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
i�sl 1 2ZI
-PAOPOSEO sETaAcKs (Fr.)
FRONT, YR?IDE
.,30,t _AAILL
. .y
ED),# // /)bATE
OCCUPANT
L-eROUP
OCCUPANT
LOAD
z
INSPECTION RECID q
FEE
Plantheplk
HEAT SOURC E
GLAZING %
AIL
i OT'ALOPE
'E
!,,Puildi
PLAN CHECK NO: ;:�71
VESTED DAM
Mechanical
-7 6.
THIS PERMIT AUTHORGMS ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLX ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
2
Grading
K19.
Recording Fee
DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
t: SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
3V
City Surcharge
LLI PERMIT APPLICATION: ISO DAYS
IL PERMIT LIMM. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARMD WITHIN 180 DAYS
Engr. Inspection
j?4:�V
State Surcharge
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Tratfic Mitigation
Plan Chk Deposit
OJI
IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CnTy OF
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Review
Receipt #
fqgq
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
I
Fireinspection
Total Amount Due
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CrrrS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.'
Landscapainsp.
Receipt #
A
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECr AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
APPLICATION
APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I OW TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
'
CALL
TIfls application Is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN IN THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or Me/her Deputy: and Fees.are paid, and
IN VIOLATIO OF E LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
receipt is acknowledged In space provided.
WORKMEWXMP�NSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
OF LS SIGNATURE DATE
SIGNATUP)Y)6wj#R OR AG
DATE
1A9
IGNED
-,z-q 10 Z_
IL125)
771-0220
RELEASED BY
779RTION
M 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
.
771-0221
L
4V
jj /z/
A FINAL INSPE CTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI.
I V
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR
10/01
FAX
PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR