24107 76TH AVE W (3).PDF111111111111
6461
24107 76TH AVE W
li7c. 1469,
, PERMIT NO: 9122-0
Ciety -of Edmonds
PERMIT EXPIRE
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
Address of Construction: ? 4/16 7 7b Aw W. LID # VIA �BALLINGE
LIFT STATION
Property Tax Account Parcel No.
Attach copies of all access and utility easements Verified and Approved b
Owner and/or Contractor: 45,40041 Z /�t �Otwm4sW& el A&4-p�e,
0*>A VA.2 / P
Contractor License #: 4 _,N 0 VI(C /M Building Permit
Single Family
El multi -Family (No. of Units
0 Commercial (No. of Units
F� Public
Invasion into City *Right -of Way: X Yes [:] No
*RW Construction Permit #
Cross other "Private Property: E] Yes x No
"Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement.
/';I$-IOLA rjQYAI AJI") Owner/Contractor /0-09-00
Owner or66ntractor signature. and ackno Qedgement statement: Date
By signing for this permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled
Side Sewer Speciftations, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein.
W CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-425-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION W
R FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-112OFextensionnq W
24 HOUR NOTICE REOUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REOUESTS
..............................
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
...... ....
Permit Fee $ Repair Fee $ issued By
Trunk Charge $
Assessment Fee $
City Permit Surcharge Fee $5.00
Date Issued: to — 't — 0 Q,�
Receipt No: C-)
Total Fees Paid $
NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN
INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED..
Job Site Ready YES NO Date: Initial:
Partial Inspection: Date: Initial:
Partial Inspection: Date: Initial:
FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: Initial: As-builtto Street File:
t� PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE t-
White Copy: File Green Co py: I nspector Buff Copy: Apolkbjn!
L;temp;bldg,forms;sspermitjlg4/00
The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO - --------- ................. ...........
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS I,ID NO . .................. ASMT. NO . ...............
PERMIT NO.
CONTRACTOR ... .... .... . ............
OWNER........ ............................ .................. ....... BLOCK NO— ----- .................
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ........ .... .........
JOB ADDRESS ...
................................................................................................................................. ............................ ...
NAMEOF ADDITION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9
Z,
1\1
L'4 10-1
7 GAA,% Ave- W,
-V
2W
Xp&ove-d:
.. .......... .. By ----------------------------------------
DATE ..... ...........
PWW-0001-1 1/75 (REV-1 1/78)
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s). Any person or entity requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
the map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
employees or officers shall be liable for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s)..
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:31
'i
P. 02
CITY EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
260 GTH AVFNUS NORTW - 40M0140S, WA 98020 - (206) 791-6220 - FAX (2M 771-0221
HEARING EXAMINER
t . 1 5 q V
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICANT: Arr�r Ashoori
CASE NO.; CU 97-21
LOCATION: 24107 76th Ave. W. (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1),
APPLICATION: A Conditional Use Permit to allow an "Accessory Dwelling Unit"
in a new addition on the south side of the existing house. A total
of five now off street parking spaces would be provided on the lot
with this proposal (set Exhibit A, Attachments 2-5).
REVIEW PROCESS. Conditional Use Permit; Hearing Examiner conducts public
hearing and makes final decision, i
MAJOR ISSUES -
a. Compliance with Edmonds Commuoity Development Code (ECDC)
Section 16,20.010 (Single Family Residential - Uses),
b. Compliance - with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20.05 (Conditional Use Permits).
c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20,21 (Accessory Dwelling Units).
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff Recommendation:
Hearing Examiner Decision:
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
Approve with conditions
Approve with conditions
The applicant and his wife are proposing an addition to their home which would allow them to
have an "Accessory Dwelling Unit". In compliance with the criteria for a Conditional Use
Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit the addition has bped designed to appear Zvi part of the
original building and to fit into the surrounding neighborhood. The existing house has a one car
garage with space for two cars in front of the existing garage which faces 241st St. SW. The
proposal would add a two car crarage facing 76h Ave. W. Also, space for an additional three cars
would be provided in front of the new two car garage.
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Si5ter Cities Int2mational — F&kinan, Japan
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:32
P. 03
PUBLIC HEARING;
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 2
After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report. and
after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application- The
hearing on the application was opened at 9:43 a.m., May 15, 1997, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds
Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 10:22 am. Participants at the public hearing and
the exhibits offered and entered are listed In thIs report. A verbatim recording of the hearing is
available in the Planning Division.
HEARING COMMENTS:
The following, is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing.
From the City.,
Stephen Bullock, Project Planner, reviewed the staff report He noted that Attachment 7
to Exhibit A states that the neighbors fence is 2 feet on his side of the property line and
that Attachment 4 to Exhibit A shows the addition will 8 till be 8' 1" from the property
linc (the zoning code allows 7' 6"). Hc recommended approval of the application with
conditions (See Exhibit A).
From the Applicant:
Amir Ashoori, Applicant, said Attachment 4 t6 Exhibit A is a rough drawing and he
introduced his architect who had a more complete drawing.
Phillip Savvens, Arrhitcct, submitted drawings into the record (Exhibit 13) and said the
drawings were Still preliminary, but noted that he had checked the dimensions and the
proposed addition will be 8 feet from the propeity line.
From the Community:
John Nordquist, Neighbor, said:
0 He lives In the house to the west of the subject property.
He bought his house in 1949 and at that time he could havt,- had a duplex on his
property, but the codes have changed and duplexes are no longer allowed.
a The Ashoori house was built on what was a wetland.
Hr, felt this propo5al will impact the neighborhood. He would liKe the
neighborhood to retain a single family look.
The yards of four neighbors all join together at one point and the neighbors will
all look at db-- proposed addition.
16 The subject house contains Furniturc, but is Ycry scIdom lived iri. The applicant
has an apartment In another location where he resides.
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:33
F. 04
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 3
The code says the dwelling shall be occupied by the owner. That docs not mean
that it is to bc occupied by rolativcs or by furniture.
Manufac,turing has been taking place on the subject property.
He hopes the proposal will not be a duplex without the applicant living in it. He
wants owner occupancy to be 2L requirement.
Ptoger Hertrich, Resident, said:
9 This is an area of low ramblers and the proposed accessory dwelling unit will stick
out like a sore thumb.
This structure will have two driveways, one off of 76'h Ave. Wand one off of 241"
St. W.
40 The second garage and driveway will make this structure look like a duplex.
The intent of the ordinance which allows accessory dwelling units was not to double
the size of your building.
Response from the Applicant:
Aniir Ashoori said,
9 His existing driveway is off of 241"' and his front door is off of 76"h - The existing
driveway will remain and because of all of the shrubs and trees you won't be able to
see both driveways from either street. Sometirnes he has two phone books left at his
house because some people now mi,5take it a two separato dwelling units.
The secobd story unit will not have that much impact. While it is true that the
immediate 4 houses are one story, there are 2 two story houses across 241".
His house was built on what had been a wetland, but the wetland had been filled
before the house was built many years ago.,
Hr, doc.3 hayc anothor place to live. His parents now live in the house and he has
rented a place for his wife and himself until he can build the accessory dwelling unit,
The he and his wife will move back in. He wants to have a separate place for his
parents. He still comes to the house almost daily.
He has a permit to conduct home office activities. He is an inyentor and hobbyist.
The second unit is not going to be a factory.
Phillip Sawers said;
ll The setbacks and height all meet the zoning code.
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:33
P. 06
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 4
The only issue i5 the. second kitchen, because everything else could be done witholut a
conditional use permit.
Response from the City:
Steve Bullock said the applicant has signed a covenant saying he will reside in one of the
two units (See Attachment 6 to Exhibit A),
CORRESPONDENCE:
One letter was received from members of the general public on this application (See Attachment
7 to Exhibit A).
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS;
A. SITE DES CRIPTION.-
1. Site Development, Neighboring Development, And Zoning:
a. Facts;
1) Size: The subject property is rectangular in ahzpe and ha3
approximately 11,600 square feet (see Exhibit A, Attachmenis I & 3).
2) Land Use: The property is carrently developed with a single family
detached house,
3) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Single-Fainify.
Residential (RS-8) (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
4) Terrain and Vegetation: The subject property is flat with finnited
ornamental landscaping and a couple of evergreen trees along the
south side of the property.
2. Suffounding Development and Zoning:
a. Facts:
1) North: This area is currently zoned under the RS-8 zoning designation
and is developed with single family homes (see Exhibit A, Attachment
2) South: This area is currently zoned under the RS-8 zoning designation
and is developed with single family homes (�ee Exhibit A, Attachment
3) West: This area is Mirrently zoned under the RS-8 zoning designation
and is developed with single family homes (see Exhibit A, Attachment
1).
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:34 F.06
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 5
4) Fast: This area is currently zoned under the RS-8 zoning designaticn
and is developed with single family homes (see Exhibit A, Attachment
1).
B. EDMONDS COMML N11TY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE:
1. ECDCSection 16.20.010(SINGLE-FAMELYRESIDEXTL,6,L- USES)
a. Facts:
1) "Accessory Dwelling Units" are a Permitted use requiring a
conditional use permit in the RS-8 zone, per ECDC 16.20.010,
2) "Accessory Dwelling Units" are required to comply with critcria
outlined in ECDC Chapter 20.21 (Accessory Dwellitig Units). See
section C.3 of this report for a discussion on how this proposal meets
the criteria for an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
b. Conclusions,-
1) A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow the establishment of an
Accessory Dwelling Unit in a single family zone. If a Concliiion�il Use
Permit is granted, the use will be consistent with the Edmonds
Community Development Code.
2. -ECDC Section 16,20.030 (SINOLFFAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Development
Standards)
a. lFacts-,
1) A letter from Mr. David Ehlers raises a concern that the applicant is
using a fence that is 2 feet onto Mr. Ehlers property as the actual
location of the property line.
2) Tlie subject property is a corner lot and as such will be required to
provide a side yard saback of 7.5 feet from the property line between
the applicant and Mr. Ehlers-
3) The applicant -and his architect are aware of the property bRe issue and
have indicated the setback requirements can be complied with.
b. Conclusions,
I The setback will be measured from the propci-ty line and Ehc applicam
will be responsible to located the property line accurately as part of the
building permit application and inspection process. It appears from the
preliminary plan (Exhibit B) that the applicant will have adequate
room to complete the proposed addition as well as provide the required
1.5 foot side'yard setback.
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:36 P.07
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 6
3. ECDC Chapter 20.05 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS)
a. Facts:
1. ECDC Scrtion 20,05 contains the review *and approval criteria for
Conditional Use Permits. , According to the afore men ti oned code
section, "No Conditional Use Permit may be approved unless all the
findings in this section can be made-" The findings are as follows:
• Comprehensive Plan - The Proposed use is compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan.
• Zoning Ordinance - That the proposed use, and its location, is
consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the
purpose of the zone district in which the use is to be located, and
that the proposed use will ineet all the applicable requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance.
• Not Detrimental - That the use, as approved or conditionally
approvM, will not be significantly detrimental to the public health,
safety and welfare, and to'nearby private property or improvellients
unless the use is a public nr,=s5ity.
• Transferability - The Hearing Examiner shall determine whather
the conditional use permit shall run with the'land or shall be
personal,
2. The applicants have stated in their declarations or shown on their plans
the following:
6 The proposal is cons is tent -with the Comprehensive Plan in that the
area is : designated for residential use which is what they are
proposing-
v The zoning ordinance allows for "Accessory Dwelling Units" in a
single family zone if a Conditional Use� Pem'iit is approved.
Assuming the proposed Conditional Use Permit is approved, the
"Accesso ' ry Dwelling Unit" will be consisterit with the Zoning
Ordinance.
Because four on -site parking stalls will be provided and the small
addition will not appear to be any more than an addition to a single
family house the proposed "Accessory Dwelling Unit" will not be
dctrimcnW to the public health, safety an welfw,e, or to nearby
private property or improvements (see Exhibit A. Attachments 3 &
b. Conclusions:
1) A conditional use is a use that has been legislatively determined to be
allowed within a given zone if appropriate conditions can be imposed
to ensure compatibility with those uses which are perTnitted as a matter
MAY-30-97 FRI 1415
F. 08
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No, CU 97-21
Page 7
of right within that zone. A conditional use thus carries a fairly heavy
assumption of acceptability within the zone it is located in. In'
consideration of any conditional use permit application, the Examiner
is required to consider the degree of compatibility which would exist
between the use and its particular surroundings and may impose such
conditions as are necessary to ensure compatibility. If compatibility
can be ensured, then die permit should be approved,
2) See Section C of this report for a discussion on how this proposal is
consistent with the Comprahensive Plan for the City of Edmon M.
3) See Section B,1-3 of this report for a discussion on how this proposal
is consistent with the uses allowed In the Zoning Code of the City of
Edmonds.
4) The proposed application will not have a significant negative impact to
surrounding properties in that a rninimlim of d-iree on -site parking
stalls will be provided and the addition will not appear to be any more
than an addition to a single family house- The addition will meet all of
the height and setback requirements of the RS-8 zone in which it is
located.
5) The permit should not be transferable per ECDC Section 20,21,035.
4. ECDC Chapter 20.21 (ACCESSORY.DWELLING UNITS)
a. Facts-
1) ECDC Section 20.21 contains the review and approval criteria for
Accessory Dwelling Units. According to the aforementioned code
saction, "No Accessory Dwelling Unit may be app�oved unless till the
findings in this section can be madc." The findings are as follows;
Compliance with the Conditional Use Permit criteria set forth in
ECDC 20.05.0 10 is req%�ired.
Existing Residence. The single-family dwelling in which the
proposed unit is to be built shall be owned and occupied for at least
two years by the applicant or the waiver criteria established by
ECDC 20.21.015 shall bo satisfied.
Area Used. Accessory dwelling units must be located within or
attached to single-family dwelling units. In no c= shall an
accessory dwelling unit be permitted in a detachcd structure such
as a guest house or garage,
Exterior Changes. The single-family appearance and character of
the residence shall be maintained when viewed frorn the
uurrounding neighborhood, Whenever possible, new entrances
should be placed aE the side or rear of the building. Only one
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:36
P. 09
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 8
clectric and one water meier shall be allowed for the entire
building, serving both the primary residence and the accessory
dwelling unit,
* Parking. Three off-street parking spaces shall be provided for a
single-family residence with an accessory dwelling unit.
& Number of Units. Only one accessory dwelling unit shall be
approved for each primary single-family dwelling.
e Occupancy. The primary dwelling or the accessory dwelling unit
shall be occupied by the owner of the subject site as long as the
accessory dwelling unit is used for dwelling purposes separate and
distinct from the primary dwelling. In no event shall the total
number of occupants exceed one family as defined in this code,
a Safety, Light, Ventilation, Floor Area and Similar Factors,
Accessory dwelling units shall comply with all applicable
requircmcots of the Uniform Building Code adopted by ECDC
Title 19 and shall comply in all respects with the provisions of the
Edmonds Community Development Code. No conditional use
permit for an accessory dwelling unit shall be issued to a
nonconforming structure tinless that st=turc is brought into
conformance with the current provisions of the Edinonds
Community Development Code.
2) The applicants have stated in their declarations Or 5hown in their plans
the following:
a An addition will be built an the horne which maintains the single
family character and appearance of the residence (sce Exhibit A,
Attachments 3 & 5).
a Three on -site parking spaces that can be accessed at any tirne will
be provided on the property. A proposed garage would provide
two additional parking spacr,3 (see Exhibit A, Attachments 3 & 5).
Only one Accessory Dwelling Unit is propo'se�d (see Exhibit X
Attachments 3 & 5).
Amir Ashoori will occupy one of the two units once completed
(see Exhibit A, Attachment 4),
3) County Assessor records show the foRowing:
Amir Ashoori has owned the property for approximately 9 years
(see Exhibit A, Attachment 6).
4) The proposed addition will be reviewed by the Building Division for
compliance with the UBC upon �submittal of a building permit
application,
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:36
F. 10
Hearing Exftminer Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 9
b. Conclusions:
1) See Section B.3 of this report for a discussion on how this proposal is
consistent with the Conditional Use Permit criteria for the City of
Edmonds.
2) The applicant has owned the house for nine years
3) The proposed accessory dwclling unit will be attached to the existing
single family house.
4) The ; proposed addition will comply with all setback and height
requirements of the R5-8 zone. The existing house has a hip roof and
a hip roof is proposed for the -addition. Access to the living space in
the addition is proposed to be locited on the south side, so that it will
appear to be another door to a single family residence, Therefore, it is
believed the single-family appear4rice and character of the residence
will be maintained.
5) Three vehicle spaces will be provided in garages, Additional off-street
parking will be provided an the driveways in front of the garages.
6) The proposal is for one accessory dwelling unit.
7) Approval of the accessory dwelling unit should be conditioned to
insure that only one of the units will be available for soineorie other
than the applicant to reside in.
8) The proposed accessory dwelling unit must be corisislent with all
applicable requirements of the ECDC including the Uniform Building
Code.
C. EDMONDS COWREMENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE:
1. Land Use
a. Facts: The City of Ednionds Cordprehensive Plan has some goals and
policies stated in i ' he Land Use Element, under Residential Development
which relate to the subject proposal.
1) LAND USE - Residential Development BA. "Support rLtention and
rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is
economically feajible. "
2) The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property Single Family
- Small Lot.
b. - Conclusions:
1) The proposed project is attempting to retain and rehabilitate existing
older housing within Edmonds. I
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:37 P.11
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CLJ 97-21
Page 10
2) The proposed use is 10c9ted in a Single Filmily - Small Lot arca on the
Comprehensive Plan and is therefore consisteni with the Land Use
designation of the Comprehensive Plan for its location.
2. Housing
a. Facts: The City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan has some goals and
policies stated in the Housing Element which relate to the subject
development proposal.
I ) KnUSING . Gio-al G.2.b, "'Provida fDr accossoq kousing in singLe
family neighborhoods that addresses the needs of extended families
and encourages housing affordability. "
b. Conclusions:
1) The proposal is to create an accc3sary dwelUng unic on a developed
single. farnfly lot which is consistent with the Coniprehen�ive Plan for
housing opportunities,
DECISION:
Based apon the foregoing findiagg and conclusioa�, the request for a conditional w5e pr,111-Lit to
allow an accessory dwelling unit is approved, subject to the following conditions:
I . This applirmlon is subject to the. applicable requirements contained in the Edmon&
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances,
2. The covenant concerning "Accemry Dwelling Units" signcd bc Mr. Arnir Ashoori shall
be recorded with the. Snohomish County Auditors Office prior to the issuance of a
building permit. (see Exhibit A, Attachment 7).
3. The proposed accessory dwelling unit shall be constructed substantially in accordance
with the plans shown on Exhibit B. The Current Planning Supervisor is authorized to
upprovu minfir mnnmnnT1nMq Aq WAr
iinnivings u& ju, thw pivpvbul. Any
nv)jol- 1-oodificaiii-ni Ur dle P" (i.e.: exterior appearance., 'including increused height,
reduced setbacks, relocation of the entry to living spaces, or modification of the style of
roof) shall be brought back to the Hearing Examiner for review prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
4. One of the two dwelling units shall be occupied by Mr. Amir Abhoori as long as the
accessory dwelling unit Is used for dwelling purposes separate and distinct from the
primary dwelling. If Mr. Amir Ashoori chooses to continue to have a separate dwelling.
then one of the two units must be unoccupied and shall not be rented to any other
individual. .
5. In no event shall the total number of occupants exceed one "family" as defined by the
Edmonds Community Development Code Section 21.30,010.
6. The subject permit shall expire immediately upon any of the following circumstances:
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:38
P. 12
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page I I
a) The accessory dwelling unit is substantially altered and is no longer in confon-nance
with the preliminary plans and drawings reviewed and approved by the Hearing
Examiner in this application (Exhibit B).
b) The subject site ceases to maintain three or more off-street parking spaces which
comply with the standards set forth in th,e FCDC, 8.5' x IS',
c) Mr. Amir Ashood ceases to own the property or live in one of the two residences on
the subject property.
6. The permit shall not be trmsferable to any other property owners,
Entered this 301h day of May, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted th . e Hearings Examine�
under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
& -bt
Ron McConnell
Hearing Examiner
RECONSIDERATION AND AJPPEALS:
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and
appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should
contact the Planning Department for further procedural information,
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION:
Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or
recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of [he date of the
initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register
and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land
which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration requesl must
cite. specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances
governing the type of application being reviewed.
APPEALS;
Sefution 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeuls of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall inclllc[e the
decision being appealed along with the name, of the project and the date of the decision, the
name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and
reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with
the Community Development Director within ten (10) woticing days after the date of the
decision being appealed,
MAY-30-97 FRI 14:38
F. 13
LAPSE OF APPROVAL:
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. CU 97-21
Page 12
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is
required, substantially commences the. use allowed within one year from the date of approval,
Me conditional use permit shall expire and be atilt and void, unless the owner files an
application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.'
NO`rlCE TO COUNTY ASSESSOP,
The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request
a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office.
EXHIBITS;
The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record.
A. Planning Division Advisory Report
B. Preliminary Drawings
PARTIES oF RECORD:
Amir Ashoori
24107 76th Ave. W,
Edmonds, WA 98026
David Ehlers
14119 76th Ave, W.
Edmonds, WA 98026
John Nordquist
7516 241" SW
Edmonds, WA 98016
Roger Hcrtrich Phillip Sawers Edmonds Planning Division
1020 Puget Drive 3316 N.E. 125" Edmonds Public Works Division
Edmonds, WA 98020 Seattle, NVA 98125 Edmonds Engineering Division
Edmonds Parks & Recreation Division
Edmonds Fire Department
'M
4
Xity of Edmonds
e
--,,-,h ck S
Critical-Are-a
)FJ rjw -r' N
The Critical Areas CheckULstc6titained�orr'�",.,ir-i�!��r"L*':t'2'n'd�.tibft&itt6-"ih6.,City.'-lli� City -will:
this form isp
-misit,7andmake a determination of the
preparing a Development Permit,-,,-.1
to co ete
-i:,�sdb;equeqt * -
p ne essary mpl a -
A 1:. 48
a
pp cation..
0a I_
Er
-the.-z—
With a sigfi6d,c" o- f this f6im
py o
Ihe purpose of the Checklist is to dickild" ubmit a vicinity map'
City staff to determine whether any -or
plot plan, for:individual lots of the parcel
potential Critical Areas are or may be.---..-- _.with.enough detail that City staff can find
present on the subject property. The and identify the subject parcel(s). In
infdrinatibif _needed,lo complete.thi:�_��'�, 7��N -'�'.-."�.adMob�lbe.appficantsbaHindude...�
Checklist should be easily available from other pertinent infornmtion (eg. site
observations of the site or data availabIe.at_,__._ — pbu4 topography map, etc.) or studies in
City Hall (Critical Areas Wventqnes,,maps,,,!,i,,I, py.cqujunction with this Checklist:.Wassf&
staff in completing thok v
orsoffsqveys)._�,�` " ` ' ' �` �, ": 1 �, 7- -
vissament.,of the site
!ZIJI :;P.
his&& reOresentativd,,!-7-.,�. .... ...
An appficant,� or
kn
must fill. oui tkecheddis�.' stg-*n'FiM_,datiI!!V.,,t
77
-fctlS,.t- i invt'r. .319
I have completed." a'aached-Critical.Area.Cheeklistand,a#A!st that,the -answers,provided. are
factual,to the best of, my.,knowledge #i#:',out,,,the a0propniate'column
Owner Appficant:-`:'- Appikant ItOpresent'ative:
M7
Name
Ok 16i W�
Stred Address,
4b-14-7
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/t6pography/hydrology/vegetaiion)
J,04
1. Site Address/Location: 7
glo 7- 7�7% 4ye h/. V
2. Property Tax Account -Number: !�4:K KKQ06 JJL 0200
�0-
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): YO
4. Is this site currently developed? no.
-Yes;
If yes; how is site developed? 'is �A-
.5. Describe the general site topogi�phj. Check all i6t
apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation changeover entire site.,.,
jenekally less than 15%'(ai Veiticaf'&e of 104ei oiveir'i`�-�'-`S
lRolling, 4 opes on --site
f 66-feet).
i horizontal distance-6 jj, ,rj,
.,Hilly: presen on' an
hse'�i�
t site i6f more th an 30%,
164e;aVver ormo, '66
ntal distance of33`i6' -4e'e"t).�
--,gra -30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
des, of.greater,than.
horizontal distance less than 33-feet).
e
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing waten. /1/() Approx. Depth:
7. S ing ii;iai of seisonafsiandifi k�'Itw%ilier: A10 iproi. De"i"'
pth:
�)-offfieyear?
S. 3�!.- Site is W'thi flo6d floodplain. of a water course.'
9. S coii ;a�� a r an flows across the grounds surface? Flow's ir� year-
round? Flowsire seasonau (What time of year?.
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow ;,shrubs.
urban landscaped Qawn,shrubs etc) X
If
Obvious.wedand is piii�ni-onsite�.:
APPLICATION
so for
'IT
RL
The City of Edmond r SIDE SEWER PERMIT
OUTSIDE XL INSIDE 19 REPAIRS 0
CARD No . ............. ..-
EASEMENT No . ............... .. ... ...... . .
.................. . .... .............................................. ...........................
OWNER ...... CONTRACTOR ... ............... ...... .... .. PERMIT No
HOUSE No. 7 STREET
....... ............... ...... �P AVENUE LOT No.
...... 4,.S . ..... /&40 .... /5--- -7�-- el ,t-74- wlrA?ylOCK No. .4 . ....................... .... ....... ... ....
NAME ADD
---------------
WY19
0
Date
BA6kFrLL WORK ORDER ISSUED . ................................... ......
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................................
................
Approved:
DEPOSIT, $ ..... : .............. - ...............................
DATE...................................................... BY ................ .................................
x-,r-,u dz!��' C�� '�- !/r , IF4 4