The URL can be used to link to this page

24219 104TH AVE W.PDF1111111111 285 24219 104TH AVE W 11 E-Djl,_ CITY OF EDMONDS WATERLINE AS -BUILT ADDRESS 24019 - 104th Place West HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR SCALE Harrington I NTS DATE DRAWN WATERLINE 1-22-2003 1 BY K. Haney NO. 2003-0042 iiiiiiiiiiiiii 15590 24219 104TH AVE W 0 ADDRESS: �qtla-1 C/ TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUM BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRI COVENANTS (RECORDED) FO CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver Xstudy Required E] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:Ai�i* SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: LID LOT: BLOCK: LATEMP\DS'rs\Fonns\Street File Checklist.doc .Owner: Greg Hale ConsfAnc. Address:16605 71"PI.W. Lynnwood Wa. 98037 Ph * (206) 650-0699 Tax Parcel : 005550-000-047-02 Lot 4 Property Address: 24219 104"' Ave. W. Edmonds Wa. 98020 +-Z F/11 i HEIGHT CALCS j ,A= -96-N 1-Z-3,-7Z-f B M-50 ) Z.6, Z4 C/ r C 4-0� 50, -Z a D 4&oe /g75, -7q Avg. Grade = 99-.2-5 IZ4r. qq Actual = 124-.8; 151, It/ Maximum -2.5 RECEIVED mAR 1 .5 2004 PERMIT COUNTER z J 1'7' tu J :E 5 W V) -i� 6 LOT COVERA LOT AREA = 11256 S.F. HOUSE & DECKS = 1550 S.F. COVERAGE 1550/11256 = 13.77% IMPERVIOUS SURFACES HOUSE, EAVES & PATIO = 1860 S.F.. DRIVEWAY & WALKS = 1.124 S.F.. TOTAL = 2924 S.F. . . -91.%q 7 LL VA. 0 tj 55 1, Fot - �A MN CWAI Isp I SIREET F1 >'O. 04� - *-31 > 4VL, DVAI — - 351. c 1-4a. z q APi- P 3 - �-b G- 3il APPROVIE !Y.PLAINNING 3 f V 5. PLOTPLAN Scale: 20 Feet -rb F -6 S 3. 6'Q Mc -tosv.iay. . ""a* -roj> 3 qq�p/- 'b lk S�s \4;k M k7 PLANNING DATA NAME: DATE: n/ r0q SITEADDRESS: '242-101- OWA AV7�5W PLAN CHK#: 03 - 53CP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: kle—1 -ST97-1- REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED? (!Ses� Njo MAP PAGE: Z�70'�5 CORNER LOT: FLAG LOT: Mes CY—e-s �/ 4�Njo) ZONING: t!�� -�2 CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: 7 col.�-p I e,-k4 -1t4l, )5-fitudy Required: UWahLer DConditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: Ll Fee UChecklist L) APO list wl notarized form U (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) aExempt 6AA6,�� SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: , I Street. S5 Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks: 1 41 Street: tlZ- Left Side: Right Side: , Rear:_0 Street map chocked for additional setback required? (Yes / Nol'D U DETACHED STRUCTURES: L3 ROCKERIES:,,�O iv+ Arpe "A,Y-4 ti -Ir-re-as 1h to+ k,,xo� -clic V ~PwAe-A tn4o e+[me," - 4�- o L3 FENCES/TREeL [3 BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODL �10- 13 STAIRS/ DECKS: PARKING: Required . Actual%;2- LOT AREA: 11. 2<15-6 Jdl BUILDING HEIGHT: Datum Point Maximum A.D.U. CREA 1?1.& 70 Elevation: 1420 ( 3 2. Z., 7,61 Height: SUBDIVISION: 4r-C—M LC�� v0j 2&,ew LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: ff—es Q0 NewBPPlanningDataForm.DOC. C114WE NO. Critical Areas Checklist ----------------------------------------- -------------------- Site lnform� ation (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) I Site Address/Location: M .56 141, 2. Pr-operty Tax Account Num er: a5 cr) - o6c> I Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 12 < f\c� Z.( 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Rec I've Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a NOV 2 5 2003 horizontal distance of 66-feet). I PERMIT COUNTER Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33. to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth- 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: No Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway 411 Q floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows ac o s the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? 10.1 Site is primarily: forested X meadow shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs 'etc) >< 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: ------- For City Staff Use Only --- — — ----- — --------- — L-1- 9;1.1. :� ite is Zoned? �2 SCS mapped soil type(s)? ALO Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? �4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? .......... OWMAEP - [W 2 000 - 91- E U C E (ONACT M4N ......................................... A coordinated utility environment which marimizesjoint utility opportunities to provide quality servicefor the citizens ofEdmonds .. . . . .......... ... . YOU WILL BE GIVEN A CONFIRMATION NUMBER BY EACH UITLITY ONCE YOU HAVE INFORMED T]�EM OF YOUR PROJECT. SITE ADDRESS: 10,3ov 2- Vz- # 671 q c�e 16P &12- 6�-- & 7 0 - -? 2- F4&:A� — 425-670-3208 You will need to provide PUD with a site plan and a completed New Service Questionnaire. PUGET SOUND # NOV 2 5 2UO3 ENERGY PERMIT COUNTER -'New Customer Construction Call to verify gas availability and to coordinate service install. Department - 1-888-321-7779 You will need to provide parcel number, contact phone number and mailing address. # '�)CV 7 Dow Brandley — 425-7lo-4ii8 You will need to provide Verizon with the location of your project, total fine requirement, and the date in which service is required. A copy of your development plan may be required. # F71-1 3 7 /'Z- 0 nn0%,A1%DA ND AM LP IV 40HAN 253-437-6go6 or e-mail: You will need to proved AT & T Broadband with the location of your project, a copy of your development and site plan (digital wa-ope-north@broadband.att.com copy if available.) The date in which service is required and a list. of contact names, Phone numbers & mailing addresses. PIC 0640 �' './p $rWOR Steve D p - 425-774-7769 You will need to provide 0VWSD with the survey map of your For customers in Olympic View Service Area site and complete a development information form. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND GIVEN TO DEVELOPMENT . I SERVICES STAFF AT THE TIME OF PERMIT SUBMITTAL 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer City of Edmonds, Development Services Department Cc: Don Fiene, P.E., Assistant City Engineer, RECEIVED Noel Miller, P.E., Public Works Director DEC 17 2007 FROM: Dennis R. Stettler, P.E. ENGI DATE: December 13, 2007 NEERING DIVISION RE: LANDSLIDE SOUTH 24219104 THAVENUE WEST INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum summarizes our observations, conclusions, and recommendations related to a landslide that occurred south of 24219 104th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington on December 3, 2007. Our services were provided in accordance with Task Order No. 07-06 with the City of Edmonds (City). December 3 was an unusually wet day with heavy rainfall totaling more than 3 inches in a period of 24 hours throughout the region. At the request of the City, Dennis Stettler of Landau Associates visited the site of the landslide with Dave Gebert, City Engineer, Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer-, and Noel Miller, Public Works Director. The purpose of the visit was to assess the conditions and consider interim remedial measures.' OBSERVATIONS The landslide occurred on the east side of the road, south of a driveway for the single family residence at 24219 1040' Avenue West. At this location, the existing ground slopes rela.tively steeply down to the edge of the roadway. The slope was relatively well vegetated with native evergreens, low brush, and ivy. The slope failure area was limited to a locahzed area several feet across and 6 to 8 feet (ft) in height. Further up the slope above the failure area, a strong stream of water could be observed that was flowing down the slope in a concentrated pathway and entering the top of the failure area. The source of the upslope water was not determined and we did not enter private property to further assess the water source. The water flow down the slope was clearly visible from the street. At the time of our site visit, water was entering the top of the failure area, flowing down the failure zone, and onto a fan of soil that had been washed down from the slope. Eventually the water was 130 2nd Avenue South 9 Edmonds, WA 98020 9 (425) 778-0907 o fax (425) 778-6409 9 www.landauinc.com captured by road catch basins. The fan was composed of brown, gravelly sand and spread out from the base of the failure zone. The failure appears to have undermined a relatively tall Douglas fir tree and removed much of the soil from the root bail. Site photographs shown on Figures I and 2, taken on December 4, 2007, show the landslide area with the tree marking the crest of the failure zone. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The failure feature has all of the classical signs of being an erosion feature rather than a slope failure feature. It is apparent that the erosion was caused by the flow of water coming from the property above the roadway. The water eroded the slope and deposited the eroded material in a fan -shaped deposition below the failure area. The source of the water is not known. Given the concentrated location of the water, we suspect it could be coming from a private drainage pipe or some other upslope feature that resulted in a concentrated flow of water at that location, instead of more diffuse surface water runoff across the slope that would normally be expected during heavy precipitation events. The eroded soil is composed of gravelly sand and appeared to be relatively competent within the undisturbed slope. We saw no indications that the failure area was the result of poor soil conditions. The erosion has undermined the large Douglas fir on the slope and the tree currently appears to be in danger of toppling. In our opinion and in the interest of public safety, it would be prudent to remove the tree as it presents an apparent hazard to the public or to adjacent private property if it should topple. We recommend that the City further evaluate the source of the water that caused the erosion. Unless the source is found and addressed, we expect that there could be future erosion problems at this location during heavy rainfall. Once the heavy rainfall ceases and erosion has stopped, it is our opinion that the eroded soil could be removed from the roadway and the road reopened to traffic. It may be appropriate to install a temporary Jersey barrier as an interim remedial measure along the edge of the roadway between the roadway and the slope in order to catch sloughing soil or additional erosion before it enters the roadway. Appropriate slope remediation at this location will depend, in part, on the configuration of the erosion feature after the erosion has ceased and following removal of the endangered tree. We expect the failure area will have a relatively steep, exposed face that will be subject to sloughing and further erosion. Potential stabilization measures could include placing a layer of quarry spalls on the slope to protect the exposed slope and reduce further erosion. It may be necessary to locally remove and slope back the soil immediately adjacent to the failure area in order to flatten the slope and remove adjacent oversteepened portions of the slope that could be subject to failure. Longer -term, it would be desirable to restabilize the 12/13/07 �XEdmdata�projectsX074\143IFileRm\R\24219-104thAveWLandslide—TM.doc LANDAu AssocIATES 2 area with vegetation. Placement of jute matting or synthetic erosion control material may be helpful in reestablishing vegetation on the steep slope. Landau Associates' services have been provided for the exclusive use of the City of Edmonds for specific purposes of evaluating the failure at the subject location. Use of this technical memorandum by others or for another purpose is at the user's sole risk. The conclusions and recommendations of this technical memorandum have been prepared based on one limited site visit at the time that active erosion was occurring. Conditions could change with time and further erosion. If site conditions change or considerable time has passed, it may be appropriate to reevaluate the conclusions and recommendation presented in this technical memorandum in light of the changes to slope configuration or site conditions. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please contact us if you have questions regarding the observations or conclusions and recommendations of this technical memorandum. Attachments: Figures I and 2 — Site Photographs 12/13/07 IkEdmdata�projects\074\143XFileRmkW4219-104lhAveWLandslide—TM.doc LANDAu AssocIATES 3 Landslide South of 24219 104 th Figure LANDAU Avenue West Site Photographs K ASSOCI.ATES I I 1 1 Vi 7,- 17 vA z k oi ioi4- Av-c W *CITY COPY TUBBSO SO 0 Mo (3 n C (30 January 9, 2004 RECEIVEL) MAR 18 2004 Greg Hale Construction, Inc. PERMIT COUNTER 16605 - 7 1 st Place West Edmonds, Washington 98037 Geotechnical Engineering Report Residential Property 10300 Block of 242" Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. HAL2-01 INTRODUCTION . This letter presents our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical conditions pertinent to proposed residential development of your property located in the 10300 block of 242" Place West in Edmonds, Washington. Our services have been performed at your request and in accordance with our services agreement dated December 16, 2003. The subject property consists of Lot 4 of Short Subdivision S-2000-82. We understand that you propose to develop the property to include one single family residence. You have asked us to evaluate geotechnical conditions within the property as a basis for providing you with information and recommendations pertinent to the proposed development. Specifically, our scope of services includes: 1. Review of published geologic and topographic information regarding the subject site and adjacent areas. 2. Surface geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas. 3. Subsurface investigation of soil conditions at the site by means of test pits excavated by a backhoe and operator you provided. 4. Preparation of this geotechnical engineering report providing our observations relative to geotechnical conditions at the site and providing our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical elements of the proposed development. Our services have been provided on the basis of a review of existing information available to us, geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas during December 2003, observation of test pit explorations on December 19, 2003, discussions with you and Mr. Gary S. Cooper, and our experience. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS The property is located between 104' Avenue West and 242" Place SW in Edmonds, Washington as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. As shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2, which is based on a drawing dated 4-2-02 by JBMF Consulting Engineers, the subject property consists of a Lot 4, located in the northwest part of the shortplat and adjacent to 104' Avenue West. Our Critical Areas Evaluation report dated April 10, 2002 for the area of the short plat that includes the subject property, described topographic, vegetative and prior development conditions within the area of the short plat. Since that report was submitted, the area of the short plat has been cleared and graded to create three building pads, driveways accessing the three lots have been constructed and paved, and storm and sanitary side sewers have been installed. Site grading included construction of a keystone block wall and two rockeries. Recommendations for design and construction of these improvements was not included in either our previous or present scope of services. We understand that the existing rockeries will be reconstructed based on recommendations by others. Geologic conditions within the area of the short plat were also described in our earlier report. As part of our present services we explored subsurface conditions within.the area of the short plat via six test pits, including three test pits within the subject property, excavated at the locations indicated on the Site Plan. A description of the subsurface exploration program and the logs of the test pits are presented in the Appendix. The observed subsurface conditions are consistent with those described in our earlier report. The subject property is underlain by glacial outwash consisting of sand and gravel deposited during the advance and retreat of the last glacier to occupy this area some 13,500 to 15,000 years ago. Local patches of glacial till, deposited directly by the glacial ice, exist within the area of the short plat but none was observed within the subject property. Some fill locally exists within the site. Because of the high infiltration capacity of the surficial soils, little or no surface 'Water runoff occurs within the site, and no emergent groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits, on the slope adjacent to 104' Avenue West, or elsewhere within the site. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-M-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The subject property is suitable for the proposed residential development provided that proper site development procedures and the recommendations below are followed. The native soils underlying the site consist of glacial outwash sand and are suitable for conventional residential foundation design and construction procedures. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK We recommend that all sod, organic soil, fill and debris be removed from settlement sensitive areas (e.g., building, pavement and slab areas). The subgrade surface in slab and pavement areas should be proof -rolled with heavy rubber -tired equipment after excavating to the desired grade. The purpose of the proof -rolling is to bring the near -surface soils to a uniform density and to identify any loose areas which might require recompaction or removal and replacement with structural fill. Temporary cut slopes for foundation excavations are expected to be as much as ten feet in height. Temporary cut slopes in the medium dense to dense native soils may be inclined as steeply as 1 H: IV and, except for minor sloughing, can be expected to stand at that inclination for a period of several weeks if protected from drying. Temporary cut slopes in existing loose or fill soils may be inclined as steeply as 1.5H:lV if protected from drying. Protection from drying applies to natural soil moisture only. Do not add water to temporary cut slopes to improve stability. If steeper temporary cut slopes are required we should be consulted to develop shoring recommendations. We understand that you anticipate new permanent cut slopes up to 6 feet in height within the eastern portion of the subject property, and rockery walls for erosion protection of those slopes. If rockery walls are used for this purpose, we recommend that they be no more than 6 feet in height, and that the toe of the rockery (see Figure 3) be located above a plane sloping 45 degrees downward from any adjacent property line and from any existing buried utilities. Cut slopes faced by rockery walls shall be no closer than 3 feet to the edge of storm or sanitary sewers, or a greater distance if required by the sewer district. If higher cut slopes are required we shall be consulted to provide other recommendations for slope protection. STRUCTURAL FILL All new fill in settlement -sensitive areas shall be placed as compacted structural fill after the site has been prepared as described above. All structural fill material shall be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. The suitability of 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs,.com . Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 4 material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve. Structural fill shall contain no more than 5 percent fines for placementin wet weather. The percent fines can be higher for placement i n dry weather, providing that the fill material is moisture -conditioned as necessary for proper compaction. The sandy native outwash soils at the site are suitable for structural fill. Structural fill placed in building or pavement areas shall be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. Utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent, except for the upper 2 feet which shall be compacted to 95 percent. We recommend that structural fill be placed in loose layers not more than 8 inches thick if a small vibratory roller compactor is used (or not more than 12 inches if a 10-ton or larger vibratory roller compactor is used), conditioned to the proper moisture content for compaction, and uniformly compacted before placing subsequent layers. FOUNDATION SUPPORT The proposed residence can be supported on conventional spread and strip footings founded on firm native soil, or can be supported on structural fill directly overlying firm native soil. Footings may be proportioned using an allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot. This value applies to the total of dead plus long term live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. This value also assumes a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous spread footings and 24 inches for isolated spread footings. The minimum depth of embedment below final adjacent grades is 18 inches for exterior footings and 12 inches for interior footings on firm native soil. Footings adjacent to a downhill slope shall be sufficiently deep to provide at least 6 feet 'of horizontal separation between the footing and the slope face, and shall be sufficiently deep or distant from the slope that a 1: 1 plane extended from the edge of the footing does not intersect the slope face. Because local areas of loose soil may be encountered at the same level as the medium dense to dense soils, we recommend that the soils beneath the footings be compacted using hand operated vibratory equipment in lifts as described above. Any loose or disturbed soils in the footing excavations, including any test pit backfill, should be recompacted prior to concrete placement. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 5 Floor slabs can. be supported on grade if site preparation is accomplished as previously recommended, or can be supported by structural fill directly overlying firm native soil. The subgrade soils should be proof -rolled as recommended above and compacted using vibratory equipment or replaced with compacted structural fill if loose areas are observed. A base course layer consisting of a minimum thickness of 4 inches of clean gravel containing no more than 5 percent fines should be placed beneath the floor slab to provide uniform support and a capillary break. FOUNDATION RETAINING WALLS The basement walls for the proposed residence function as retaining walls and shall be designed as such. Assuming that the walls that are allowed to deflect 0.01 times the height of the wall, we recommend an active lateral pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming level backfill compacted and drained as outlined below. If the backfill surface slopes no steeper than 2H: IV percent upward away from the wall, a lateral soil pressure value of 60 pcf should be used. Resistance to lateral footing loads can be developed both through friction on the base of the footings and passive pressures along the sides. Friction resistance on the base of the footing be computed using an internal soil friction angle of 30 degrees. Passive soil pressures may be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot, providing the backfill around footings is compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D- 1557). These resistance values include a factor of safety of about 1.5. The above lateral soil pressures assume the walls will be backfilled with clean, free - draining sand or sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). This drainage zone should be at least 18 inches thick horizontally. The drainage material and remaining backfill placed behind the wall and not supporting structural . elements should be compacted to approximately 90 percent of the maximum dry density. Heavy compaction equipment should not be operated within 3 feet of the retaining walls; no compaction tests will be necessary within 3 feet of the walls. A permanent subsurface drainage system should be installed at the base of all subsurface walls. These subdrains should consist of rigid, smooth -wall, 4-inch-diameter (minimum) perforated PVC pipe, nonwoven filter fabric such as Mirafi drainage product or equal, and surrounded by pea gravel or well -graded gravelly sand or sandy gravel with less than 3 percent fines (soil finer than the No. 200 mesh sieve) based on the fraction smaller than 3/4 inch. The drainpipes should discharge into tightlines sloped to drain by gravity to 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 6 the existing storm sewer system. Roof drains shall not discharge into the footing drain system. SITE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL We understand that the City of Edmonds requires water to be routed through an on - site infiltration trench prior to being conveyed to the storm sewer system. We recommend that the bottom of the infiltration trench be sufficiently deep and distant from any adjacent downhill slopes so as to meet the setback requirements specified above for footings. We recommend that water from footing drains be routed directly to the storm sewer via a tight line. If the footing drains must be routed through the infiltration trench, the outlet from the infiltration trench to the storm sewer shall be at an elevation at least 3 feet lower than the footing drains in order to avoid the possibility of water from roof drains backing up into the footing drain system. The surficial soils within the subject property are susceptible to potential erosion and shallow debris slides if disturbed by construction or other activities. Erosion controls are therefore recommended, including the proper control of surface water runoff, minimizing the time of exposure in the area stripped during construction, and prompt revegetation. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for Greg Hale Construction, Inc. and its representatives for use in planning, permitting and designing residential development of Lot 4. Descriptions of subsurface conditions relative to foundation support and other aspects of the proposed development are based on surface observations and shallow subsurface explorations, and conditions should be confirmed by observations in the excavations at the time of construction. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices followed in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty, expressed or implied, should be understood. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 7 We trust that this report meets your present needs. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. vy as *1 Donald W. Tubbs '� �' I �). 0� WA S 0 V) z 2 330 'SN 0 / I ONAL EXPIRES: 1 E/2�4�/04 Document B): HAL201 R I Yours very truly, Tubbs Geosciences 9 - -� Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Engineering Geologist Enayat S. Aziz, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering consultant to Tubbs Geosciences 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com DO 03 C/) or 0 AL— ?00 77 7-7//— mood, jp Sm'&. a 411le LL 41 4P - of Is 0 z ism em-�. a.. 11 i is a s a limbo a IF a GRAMIC acmz (W fEET) ." 1. = .— ...� ft-9 th. ...d III. ,2" CP —.—� — I= CPCP P%. -d —t I. Ce It ol It -ul Is 01 lei VARIABLE- G, I IBATTEV-. .A 8* MIN -THICKNESS 4"-Z7QUAKRY5 ZL W X > I"MINUS WASHED ROM AS NSEDr=D PILTIOL FABRIC AS NF_Et)r_-C) ORIGINA-L CaROUI-40 G;' PERY PIPE AS NF-EDr--D FOlk SU135UIZ-FACE W1b,,tF_V,. EXCAVAT%ON ONO( Rockery walls shall be constructed of rocks in the following size categories: Two -man rocks (300 to 600 pounds), 13" in least dimension; Three-man rocks (800 to 1200 pounds), 16" in least dimension; Four -man rocks (1500 to 2200 pounds), 18 " in least dimension. The rock material shall be hard, sound, durable and free from weathered portions, seams, cracks, and other defects. Rocks should be as tabular in shape as possible; rounded or very angular rocks shall be avoided. The larger rocks shall be placed at the base of the wall. Four -man rocks shall be used for the bottom course in walls higher than 6 feet. The lowest course of rocks shall be keyed into firm foundation material at least 12 inches below the adjacent grade. Rocks shall be selected and placed to minimize void space between rocks. Rocks shall be placed in a manner such that the long axis of the rock is normal to the face of the wall. To the greatest extent possible, rocks shall be placed with faces in contact; point contact shall be avoided. Inclining interfaces between rocks shall slope downward toward the back of the wall. After setting each course of rock, voids between the rocks shall be chinked on the back with quarry rock to eliminate any voids larger than two inches across. TUBBSOB(DOC O'SnDsa ROCKERY WALL SCHEMATIC FIGURE 3 APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS The subsurface conditions within the subject site and adjacent areas were explored by excavating six test pits with a track -mounted backhoe on December 19, 2003. The test pit locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The locations are approximate and were estimated in the field based on site features shown on the Site Plan. The explorations were backfilled with the excavated material and compacted with the backhoe bucket. The test pits were continuously monitored by an engineering geologist from our firm who observed the materials encountered, noted ground water conditions and maintained a detailed log of each exploration. The soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the classification system shown in Figure A- 1. The test pit logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-3. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUPNAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE GRAINED GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVEL on No. 4 Sieve SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND More Than 50% Retained on SID POORLY -GRADED SAND No. 200 Sieve More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND No. 4 Sieve FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC SOILS CL CLAY Liquid Limit ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY Less Than 50 SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50% INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT 50 or More HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM D TUBM�803- COMCW FIGURE A-1 F1 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND CLASSIFICATION SURFACE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION (FEET) TEST PIT TP-1 0-1.0 SP Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 1.0-4.0 SM Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash] 4.0-5.0 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (dense, damp) (Vashon recessional outwashl 5.0-7.0 SM Gray silty sand with some gravel (very dense, damp) [Vashon till] 7.0-9.0 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt (very dense, damp) [Vashon advance ourwashl Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-2 0-0.5 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 0.5-1.5 SP Brownish gray gravelly sand with trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional ourwashl 1.5 3.5 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash) 3.5-5.5 SM Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash) Bottom of test pit at 5.5 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOWOT TUBBS(3&0aC0'(3nQ31% LOG OF TEST PIT E FIGURE A-2 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND CLASSIFICATION SURFACE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION (FEET) TEST PIT TP.3 0-2.5 SP Brown sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots, some construction debris (loose, damp) [fill] 2.5-3.5 SP Gray sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots, some construction debris (medium dense, damp) [fill) 3.5-4.0 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [buried topsoil] 4.0-7.0 SM Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) Ivashon recessional ourwashl 7.0-9.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-4 0.0.5 SP Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 6.0-3.0 SP Brownish gray sand with trace of gravel, some silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwashl 3.0-6.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT TUBBS0800C . '08nC80 LOG OF TEST PIT I I FIGURE A-3 I EM 0 LOG OF TEST PIT * DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND CLASSIFICA71ON SURFACE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION (FEET) TEST PIT TP.5 0-3.5 SM Da rk brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [fill] 3.5-4.5 SM Reddish brown silty sand with trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) Ivashon recessional outwash] 4.5-7.0 SP Medium brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recesssional outwashl Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP.6 0-1.0 SM Medium grayish brown silty sand with some gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [fill) 1.0-2.0 SM Dark brown silty sand with trace of gravel, some roots ( medium dense, damp) (buried topsoil] 2.0-6.0 SP Medium grayish brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash) 6.0-7.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some silt, some gravel (dense to very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT TUBBSO&DOCO'SnC81% LOG OF TEST PIT I I FIGURE A-4 I .Owner: Greg Hale Const. Inc. Address:16605 71'PI.W. Lynnwood Wa. 9803 7 Ph. (206) 650-0699 TaxParcel: 005550-000-047-02* Lot4 Property Address: 24219 104 1h Ave. W. Edmonds Wa. 98020 �1�fvv'--40 . _u, HEIGHT CALCS -96.09 ,A= B t%.-56 12, t C m2-50 D 11�. Avg. Grade -49.251 Actual=-4,14-+7 Maximum � CITY (;40PY R 4PIVF-D LOT COVERAGE LOT AREA = 11256 S.F. HOUSE & DECKS = 1550 S.F. COVERAGE 1550/11256 = 13.77% IMPERVIOUS SURFACES' HOUSE, EAVES & PATIO = 1860 S.F.. DRIVEW AY & WALKS = 1.124 S.F. TOTAL = 2924 S.F. z fie) J Ci 1'7' �i z7ZE"M V) _N < 0 U) W� z %T < \qAj --,"MEOW C356.00) pwo<s" 10 .3 _,V AR V0004 <,X C4 PA.-rv—, 0-,. -r r%nHK1Tr-P (Abe.thoi - <e- 2�1 - 016 C7 3-44.06 PENVII mti e- -10 ZONE SETBACKS: FRONT. APPRO Y'PLANNING SIDE REAR OTHER A PLOT PLAN : F'= 20 Feet HEIGHT Scale—F-7 Tusssaaoac�sndsa Date: 5/4/04 F I E L D REPORT Page: I of I Owner: Greg Hale Construction, Inc. File#: HAL2-01 - Purpose of visit: Foundation inspection Weather: Partly cloudy I arrived at the site at 10:45 am. Project: 24219 - 104'hAvenue West Permit #: 2004-0291 Field report #: I Prepared by: Donald W. Tubbs The foundation excavation is complete. The footing excavations are directly underlain by native soils consisting of glacial outwash sand; a small area of glacial till appears to exist beneath a? least part of the area of the garage floor slab. I probed the soils within the footing areas using a half -inch steel probe, and observed that the native soils are generally medium dense to dense, except'for two small areas (near the southeast comer of the house and near the center of its west wall) where loose soils existed to a depth of over a foot. I recommended that those two areas be overexcavated and replaced with some of the nearby stockpiled gravelly sand, placed and compacted in 8-inch lifts. I also recommended that the footing areas be subsequently recompacted to a uniformly dense condition using hand -operated vibratory compaction equipment. This will be verified during a second field inspection tomorrow morning. No temporary or permanent cut slopes greater than 10 feet in height exist within the site. The permanent cut slopes to the north and east of the house are approximate 6 feet in height. The slope includes an upper segment inclined approximately 3H: IV, and a lower segment consisting of a single tier keystone block wall 3 feet in height. It is our opinion that the keystone block walls that have been constructed will adequately provide the intended erosion protection along the lower portion of the slope. I left the site at 11: 15am. Attachments: Distribution: 2004 ,)E\IELO�MENT SERVICES CTR' CITY OF EDMONI)S Signed: 7505 West Lake Sammamish Redmond, Washington 98b3f- 425-882-4850 VVWW TU1313SQ(90aC�@nC9a Date: 5/5/04 F I E L D REPORT Page: I of I Owner: Greg Hale Construction, Inc File #: HAL2-01 Purpose of visit: Foundation inspection Weather: Partly cloudy I arrived at the site at 10:00 am. Project: 24219 - 104' Avenue West Permit #: 2004-0291 Field report #: 2 Prepared by: Donald W. Tubbs The two areas of loose soils that were observed yesterday have been excavated and replaced with structural fill consisting of compacted gravelly sand. The footing areas have been compacted using hand -operated vibratory compaction equipment. The compacted native and structural fill soils within the foundation area were probed with a half - inch steel probe, and verified as suitable for the design bearing value of 2000 psf provided in our geotechnical report dated January 9, 2004. I left the site at 10: 15am. Attachments: Distribution: RECEIVED mAY 10 2004 DEVELOPMENT sERyICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Signed: �4 7505 sh Parkway Northeast 4Zb-t$tJZ-4t5bU WWW.tUbbS.COM LMDAU ASSOCIATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM OM"&ZVK I GWMCWZ= I WNW MMU= TO: Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer City of Edmonds, Development Services Department Cc: Don Fiene, P.E., Assistant City Engineer, RECEilVEin Noel Miller, P.E., Public Works Director DEC 17 2007 FROM: Dennis R. Stettler, P.E. ENGINEERING L" ViSION DATE: December 13, 2007 RE: LANDSLIDE SOUTH OF 24219 104T" AVENUE WEST INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum summarizes our observations, conclusions, and recommendations related to a landslide that occurred south of 24219 104'h Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington on December 3, 2007. Our services were provided in accordance with Task Order No. 07-06 with the City of Edmonds (City). December 3 was an unusually wet day with heavy rainfall totaling more than 3 inches in a period of 24 hours throughout the region. At the request of the City, Dennis Stettler of Landau Associates visited the site of the landslide with Dave Gebert, City Engineer, Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer, and Noel MiUer, Public Works Director. The purpose of the visit was to assess the conditions and consider interim remedial measures: OBSERVATIONS The landslide occurred on the east side of the road, south of a driveway for the single family residence at 24219 1040' Avenue West. At this location, the existing ground slopes relatively steeply down to the edge of the roadway. The slope was relatively well vegetated with native evergreens, low brush, and ivy. The slope failure area was limited to a locahzed area several feet across and 6 to 8 feet (ft) in height. Further up the slope above the failure area, a strong stream of water could be observed that was flowing down the slope in a concentrated pathway and entering the top of the failure area. The source of the upslope water was not determined and we did not enter private property to fiuther assess the water source. The water flow down the slope was clearly visible from the street. At the time of our site visit, water was entering the top of the failure area, flowing down the failure zone, and onto a fan of soil that had been washed down from the slope. Eventually the water was 130 2nd Avenue South * Edmonds, WA 98020 a (425) 778-0907 * fax (425) 778-6409 e www.landauinc.com captured by road catch basins. The fan was composed of brown, gravelly sand and spread out from the base of the failure zone. The failure appears to have undennined a relatively tall Douglas fir tree and removed much of the soil from the root ball. Site photographs shown on Figures I and 2, taken on December 4, 2007, show the landslide area with the tree marking the crest of the failure zone. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The failure feature has all of the classical signs of being an erosion feature rather than a slope failure feature. It is apparent that the erosion was caused by the flow of water coming from the property above the roadway. The water eroded the slope and deposited the eroded material in a fan -shaped deposition below the failure area. The source of the water is not known. Given the concentrated location of the water, we suspect it could be coming from a private drainage pipe or some other upslope feature that resulted in a concentrated flow of water at that location, instead of more diffuse surface water runoff across the slope that would normally be expected during heavy precipitation events. The eroded soil is composed of gravelly sand and appeared to be relatively competent within the undisturbed slope. We saw no indications that the failure area was the result of poor soil conditions. The erosion has undermined the large Douglas fir on the slope and the tree currently appears to be in danger of toppling. In our opinion and in the interest of public safety, it would be prudent to remove the tree as it presents an apparent hazard to the public or to adjacent private property if it should topple. We recommend that the City further evaluate the source of the water that caused the erosion. Unless the source is found and addressed, we expect that there could be future erosion problems at this location during heavy rainfall. Once the heavy rainfall ceases and erosion has stopped, it is our opinion that the eroded soil could be removed from the roadway and the road reopened to traffic. It may be appropriate to install a temporary Jersey barr ier as an interim remedial measure along the edge of the roadway between the roadway and the slope in order to catch sloughing soil or additional erosion before it enters the roadway. Appropriate slope remediation at this location will depend, in part, on the configuration of the erosion feature after the erosion has ceased and following removal of the endangered tree. We expect the failure area will have a relatively steep, exposed face that will be subject to sloughing and further erosion. Potential stabilization measures could include placing a layer of quarry spalls on the slope to protect the exposed slope and reduce further erosion. It may be necessary to locally remove and slope back the soil immediately adjacent to the failure area in order to flatten the slope and remove adjacent oversteepened portions of the slope that could be subject to failure. Longer -term, it would be desirable to restabilize the 12/13/07 "Edmdata�orojectsk074Xl43XFileRm%R%24219-104thAveWLendslide—TM.doc LANDAu AsSOCIATES 2 area with vegetation. Placement of jute matting or synthetic erosion control material may be helpful in reestablishing vegetation on the steep slope. Landau Associates' services have been provided for the exclusive use of the City of Edmonds for specific purposes of evaluating the failure at the subject location. Use of this technical memorandum by others or for another purpose is at the user's sole risk. The conclusions and recommendations of this technical memorandum have been prepared based on one limited site visit at the time that active erosion was occurring. Conditions could change with time and further erosion. If site conditions change or considerable time has passed, it may be appropriate to reevaluate the conclusions and recommendation presented in this technical memorandum in light of the changes to slope configuration or site conditions. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please contact us if you have questions regarding the observations or conclusions and recommendations of this technical memorandum. Attachments: Figures I and 2 — Site Photographs 12/13/07 I%Edmdata\pmjects%074%143\FileRm\R\24219-104thAveWLendslide—TM.doc LANDAu AsSOCIATES 3 21 40 J14 'k, IN 0 I 04thAVE W pole I 20-foot road bore Comcast of Washington, LLC 1525 75thStreet SW Suite 200 Everett, WA 98203 Contact: Gary Clawson 425-263-5412 North Drop Node: EM31 2,1219 104' AVE W - City of Edmonds ot Open trench in ROW approx. 10- feet m/l - -0 Wood box N W *+ 9- E S NORTH NOT TO SCALE Work Details Open trench in shoulder of ROW approx. 1 0-feet m/I and bore road approx. 20-feet m/I to extend and bury CATV service drop to 24219 104th AVE W. Install cable at 36" depth. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing or better conditions. Backfill material will be mechanically compacted to 95% of maximum density as specified by the City of Edmonds. In tight corridors hand trenching will be utilized to ensure protection of other utilities. Contractor must locate all existing utilities impacted by this project. Please see attached plans for restoration, erosion control and traffic control. Erosion control will consist of placing filter fabric fence and/or sandbags along curbs and catch basins where necessary. Keep drainage system clean and functioning. Remove all debris from the work site. Streets and roads will be cleaned both during and after installation of work. *comcast 0 Traffic control set-up for minor encroachment Traffi(, control set-up for lane closure DD"Md�rVIQ rIPTIkAWT TXTU A XTIr-6 YTO-.VT"t� �� A x �y x r-kiqJ-P JL in'"ir "'3r" rl"Urka "r "rr'na JL JUIN: Timeline - Up to 30-days past the issue date. Work Hours -The entire project area will be conducted from 7:00 AM to&:00 PM or as sped ied by the Inspector. Traffic Control Plans 1. The standards and guides of the latest version of the MUTCD or as set-up per Code shall be followed at all times. 2. A copy of the Permit and Traffic Control Plan shall be on -site with all contractors during the project. 3. All contractors will avoid parking on sidewalks and shoulders and will take the lane and follow the proper traffic control set-up for the given situation. 4. Pedestrian access shall be maintained through orkdetoured around all work sites. S'6"'FELA 5. Please find attached the traffic control plans for the various types of work sites that will be encountered during our project. 6. Flaggers will be used only when all other methods of traffic control are inadequate to warn and direct drivers. Only licensed flaggers will be used on the project. 7. If situations occur when questions arise about proper traffic control set-up the solution will be determined in the field with the Comcast Construction Rep. and the Inspector. rosion es If curb and crutters in project axea: 0 • Filter bags will be placed in catchbasins downstream of work site, and • Small check dams of pea gravel filled sandbags will placed within the gutter upstream of the catchbasin. 11;iJ FLAGGER STATION space yq - - :14 1 100, space d6 cfb- FLAGGER STATION APPROVEDAS NOTED BY ENGINE RING L-*n P Z3 0/0-0- 0 Depth = 36-inch minimum Compatible w/ other utilities Shoring required at 4-ft + Pavement Cuts = T-cut 1 -ft wider than trench Neat -line, saw -cut edge Compaction.. S T ,, U, Depth, Cleaning, Containment, Compaction, and Restoration All trench backfill shall be mechanically compacted to 95 percent of maximum density using I -f t loose lifts with whacker or 2-ft loose lift with a hoe pack. If proper compaction cannot be achieved with the native material, new import material is required at the 95 percent rate. As an alternative, CDF can be used in a design mixture approved by the Engineer. C60mcast eanin CLEANING: All Streets and roads are required to be cleaned and swept both during and after the installation work. Mechan-ical-Vacuum is preferred meth-od CONTAINMENT: All un-restored shoulders or material storage areas are required to be contained with reflective barricades. 4111 .�Restoratioh All disturbed areas shall be restored to existing or better conditions Trench parallel to road: Shoulder - Match existing surface conditions Pavement - 6 1/2 inches of crushed surfacing material and asphalt.concrete Class B at 2- inches minimum or same thickness if greater.. Trench across road (immediate cold mix patch): fi* Asphalt - Permanent hot mix patch at same thickness or 2-inches and sealed within 30 days. Concrete - saw cut and pored with mastic joints, eight - sack rrdx, either type II of III cement, within 30 days. I VOL RECEIVED P;ge- *1 APR - 5 2004 PART...A.. PREAMBLE: PERMIT COUNTER on this-twenty-,seaond day of Octoberp 1956,9 for the purpose of protect- ing the following described real property ' situate in the State of Washingtonp County of Snohomish, and more particularly described as follows, to wit: Lots Forty-thr . ;ee (43) through pifty-four (54) inclusive* all in Richmond Park Homes.Divi8ion No. 2. recorded in Volume 14 of Deeds on pages 11-and 12, rec6rds of Snohomish County, Washington. PART.B. AREA OF APPLICATION: B-1 Fully Protected Residential Area.. The res . Iftntial area covenants in ?art C in their entirety shall apply to each'and every lot and block in said Addition. PART C. ItESIDENTIAL AREA COVENANTS. C-1 Land Use and Building Type. No lot shall be used except fcr residential purposes. No build- ing shall be erected, altereds placeds or permitted to remain on any lot other than one detached single-family dwelling not to exceed one and one-half stories in height and a private garage for not more then two cars.. C-2 Dwelling Cost, Quality and Size. No dwelling shall be permitted on any lot at a cost of less than $14,000.00 based upon cost levels prevailing on the date these covenants are recordeds nor unless the ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one story open porches and garages be not less than 1200 square feet for a one story dwelling* nor less than 1100 square feet for a dwelling of more than one story. C-3 Building Location. No buildipg.j�hall._be'locatod on any lot nearer than 20 feet to the front No'.�uildlng shall be located on any lot nearer than 10 feet to,,:'nyto- Wetreet line. No.building shall be located t jq4 . ldo�'�g nearer thao-,5 16 ot lioe'o,except that no side yard shall be- requirid for a Sara "0'fV4, ''er'.p6rinitUd accessory building located T_04&j,'Aj'fijjj building 'ietback line) as.her*ln :.50 feet or mo]Ooj_ 'dwilling'-btitll',be4'-looat* any interior lot nearer spool-fied. No 0 '' I & , I; ,,than 30'foot to the rear' lt#. IUC - For di purp6iid of this covenantl, i i . Wow." 11 not noldored as a part of a 'bUildihi. 4, N LA Page 2 voi. 605 pAcF295 C-4 Easements. Easements for Installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shown on the recorded plat. C-5 Nuisances. No noxious or offensive activity shall be :.-arried on upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or my become an annoy- ance or nuisance to the neighborhood. C-6 Temporary Structures. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any �ime as a residence, either temporarily or permanently. C-7 Signs. No signs of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one square foot, one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the. construction and sales period. C-8 Livestock and Poultr No animals, livestock, or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats or other household pets may be kept provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose.. C-9 Garbage and Refuse Disposal. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish. Trashj garbage, or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. c-10 water SuDol No individual water -supply system shall be permitted on any lot unless such system is located, constructed and equipped in ac�:ordance; with requirementso standard and recommendations of the Snohomish County, Washington, Department of Health. C-11 Sight Distance at Intersection. No fence, hedge or shrub -planting which obstructs sightlines at elevations between two and six feet abov6 the roadways shall be placed or permitted to remain on any corner lot within the triangular area formed by the street property 14nea and a line connecting them at IF ---------- VOL UtM P4096 Pav �47 t points 95. -fdo iiitersoction'of street lines or in the, 4� ci 94� f- a kounded tycorner from -intersection lot the street property lines exten .-i�The,mm sight line limitations shall apply to.aby lot'within 10 feet -from the intersection of a street property linewith the edge of a drtveway or alley pavement. No tree shall be permitted to remain within such distance of such intersections unless the foliage line is maintained at sufficient height to prevent obstruc- tion of such sight lines. C-12 Sewage Disposal. No individual sewage -disposal system shall be permitted on any lot unless such system is designed; located and constructed in accord- ance with the requirements, standards and recommendations of the Snohomish County, Washington, Department of Health. PART*D GENERAL PROVISIONS D-1 Term. These covenants are to run with the land and�shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of 25 years*from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of 10 years unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of the lots has been recorded,,agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part. The purchase of any lot in this subdivision shall constitute an agreement on the part of such purchaser to be bound by these protective covenants in their entirety and to abide by the same. D-2 Enforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damages. D-3 Severability. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. . t!i I I tl VOL 60 RUM fact. i'XFd,* kGICSTIRUM, 'by his a STATE OF .... !NOAPO-S ............... County of .... !!�?�!m . ish .................... On this ... 9 ............. day of ......................... A. j). I 9�� ..... lj,,�. thv under- signed, a Notary Public in and for the Sligate Of .... ?;qp44WW.R ....................... tinly conlinissiolled and sworn, Personally appeared .... P!4�J.Wick trym ........................... ........... to me known to be the individual described ill alkil who ext!voted the forcgoilig for . ................. . ........................ self and as attorney lit fatilt aitto therein described. and acknowledged to me that$ —i! lit, sigilt"I -UR#I ,fnjivo iiii, ,tainte IkA ........ her ......... voluntary act anti de -I and as Iliv free auld voluniary avt all'i 'It-ed of th'! saitl ... for the itses laild 111"Illi'llied. and on oath stated lhat the powtIr or aji.qjwy wilhorivioir the 'Nawoli--11 44 this IIWA rpt. be.en revoked anti that the sniol—AX911-100trAW ..... ... .. .. -- - - - - - '�- 'I—' livillir. -vto aftl 1 11 1 y wid. p-al. ill Illis c-i-lifival'. �V-ill hei abovliaowritten. T NESS my hand atilt official m, .......... 4� -to 'ul It' in:'" I f.-r t h,- SO ast ra I ret (Acknowledgement by Self anti as Attok-ne.N ji, tonvi. Withitigum 111h, I -t "1 4 VOL ,ts, 0 6 6 cm Lai ,Ax: ri LCL, '23 607 f,,L,,297m t-os Statutory Warranty Deed v . THE GRANTOR as AXEL WICKSTROM AND BETTY M. WICKSMON, his wife# for and in considerat ion of TEN AND NO/101) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars in hand paid, conveys and warrants to ROY W. LUDIM AND WII14A J. LTIMG, Ilia wife, the following described real estate, situated in the County of Snohomish Washington: , State of Lot 47S Richmond Park Homess Division Not Ps according to plat thereof recorded in volume 14 of plats, pages 11 and 12, records of said county. Subject to: Easoment for drainage and access purposes three feet in width lyin southerly of the northwesterly line of said Lot 47. 4J4� REICEIVED - 52004 PERMIT COUNTER REAL ESTATE SA SUBJECT TO easementsp restrictions and reservations of record* AMOON'r P*o_,_7TL.,,2_AK PF(-.rlwr -4n I VM NOV 15 06 ONE= Dated this tiny of October, 1956, CEMM= J A�e' 71 /C 4e STA-rE OF WASHINGTON, It On this __)5?9k___dsy _0"0_b*P_ 61 signed, a Notary Public in and for Ilia State f.-_ _.,__WARhJMton and sworn, P'ersonally appeared--- -1 -_ ISM K.._W1CKXRQM__.. — � to me known to be the individual deorrihed In and who exectitod ;he loirwok" it,onnieno (,,I bar ,It .,,.I as attorney in fact of_ AYRT. wrMST2171111 �- _ ___. A10" 111'r,io d"'.61-1, -An"N"I'Ar'd I., 111� --g—he signed and sealed the saime nq _lmia_ .-.vo Ion I a ry nr.i ni n'! Alf 1 1 n I I I I — 11. � f. —I - ., I'm I A ,. ..� I A "d of the said AXEL WICKS".. for the open orl vurl.ev th—i" rn—li-lej. "'d .... .. Mh stated tha=he power of attorney auth6rizing the execution of this inetturnent lion n-A heen v-,oked anA ihm th, _i.j WIGUM -in now living, wrrNESS my hnplav)d PK-Jal peail hir4to affixed the to �t "Ain thin �Rtv� Ahov tv**,t_ I'sm I-, Nm NO EXCISE 41X REQUIRED JUL 15-2003 AFTER RECOROM RETURN 80B DMITINI, Snabodsil Qtualr limcl Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish Co&m1y By BOB DANTINI A IM: Real Estate Services - 04 P.O. Box 1107 Evervf4 WA 90206 �illimilligilial 20030715il46 2 PGS 07-15-2003 03:54PM $20 SNOViOf41SV' COUNT' - 14ASHI'ONOGTON r 7D 1180 (Rev. 3/92) DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT E- 0Z Underground SW 36(27-3) (335101-06)7020-4592 THIS INDENTURE made this /I dayof ZANE �=3, between SONOMA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. INC. a WashInaton corporation, hereinafter referred to as Grantor, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. I OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, and Verizon Northwest Inc. ' hereinafter referred to as Grantee; and hereinafter referred to as Mortgagee. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS. Grantor is the owner of certain real property (Property' herein) in the County of Snohomish , State of Washington, described as follows* Lots 2 through 4, City of Edmonds Short Plat No. SPS-20004W, recorded under Auditovs File Number 200301175MI, being a portion of that certain Short Plat recorded under Auditoes File Numba 2cmoe225o06, all records of Snohomish County. Washington; BEING a portion of the Southwest Owrtar of Section 36, Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.M. Tax Parcel No. 00555000004700 AND WHEREAS. the Grantee is desirous of acquiring certain rights and privileges across, under and upon said Property. NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor, for and In consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration. receipt of which Is hereby admowledged, hereby convoys and grants to Grantee. its agents, contractors, successors and assigns, the perpetual right, privilege. and authority to construct. erect. alter. Improve. extend. repair, operate, and maintain underground electric distribution Una facilities consisting of condults. cables, lines, vaults. switches and transformers. communication Ines. fiber optic cables. seml-burled and ground mounted facilities and pads and any other necessary or convenient appurtenances, across, under and upon that portion of the Property (Easemord Area" herein) described as follows situated In the County of Snohomish State of Washington, to-wU: Easement Area No. I Ali streds and road right of ways as now or hereinafter designed, pl~, andfor constructed within the above -described property. When mid ablests and road right of ways are dedicated to the public for road purposes this Easement Ana No. I shall become null and vold. Easement Arm No. 2 An easement area 10 feet In width across all Me, tracts and spaces located 'within the above -described property being parallat to and coincident wfth,the bounder[" of all pi"te/public street and road right of ways. Together with the right of ingress to and egress from said easement area across adlacent lands of the Grantor, for the purpose Of constructing, reconstrucurV, repairing, renewing, altering, changing. patrolling and operating said facilities, and the right at any the to remove said faciliffes from said lands. Also the right at all times to cut and/or trim all brush, timber, tees or other growth standing or growing upon the property of Grantor which. in the opinion of Grantee, Is necessary for the operation and maintenance- of GrantaWs facilities andlor constitute a menace or danger to said facilities or to persons or property by reason of n successors, or assigns of Grantor hereby covenant and agree not to proximity to said fine. Gra tor arid the heirs. construct or permit td be constructed any structures of any kind on the easement area without approval of the District. The Grantor and the heirs, successors or ass" of Grantor covenant and agree not to do any blasting or discharge any explosives within a distance of three hundred (300) feet of said line without giving reasonable notice in writing to the Grantee, its successors or assigns, of !Mention so to do. RECEIVE0 APR - 5 200,j PE'MIT COUNTER 0 0 The rights. fitle. privileges and authority hereby granted shall continue to be in force until such time as the Grantee. its successors or assigns. shall permanently remove said facilities and appurtenances from said lands, or shall otherwise permanently abandon said line, at which time all such rights, title, privileges and authority hereby granted shall terminate. The Grantor also covenants to and with the Grantee thal Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of land aforesaid; has a good and lawfuil right and power to sell and convey same; that same are free and dear of encumbrances, except as above indicated; and that Grantor will forever warrant and defend the title to said easement and the quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever. Any mortgage on said land held by the Mortgagee is hereby subordinated to the rights herein granted to the Grantee, but In all other respects the said mortgage shall remain unimpaired. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been executed the day and year first above written. Please sign and have notarized below (REPRESENTATIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT) State of Washington County of 1< e* n G I certify that I'know or have satisfactory evidence that —514 A P,& fV Z, , ig/l m z�,* P signed this Instrument on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the Instrument and adinowledged It as the Aa.A,0ajL— I ---.d (OFFIOEWARAGM PARTNER Erc.) SONOMA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, MIC� ---.to be the free and v0k1ft%FY act P= CORPORATION EM) for the uses and purposes mentioned in the Instrument taw Dated - -(Q - . I - Slg�turel Of Notary Public Title Notary PUbfk— My appointment expires a;i_- I I - 0 11111011111111 200307220296 3 PGS 07-22-2003 10:59am $21.00 RETURNADDR SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON Puget Sound Energy, Inc. A% ROW Department IF, — EASEMENT (customer form) 0 NO EXCISE TAX �, : iffilFr) Al. 2 2 2003 MR Ifewel gy BOB DANTINI REFERENCE 9: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. SHORT LEGAL:Am:s Z.36,-I. Eomo-w &P 511MV-91- see full legal on pagea AdSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL: cosm-o— -OV? OP or U MAP NO: SW%-771ag —JOB NO: 10701691"r- FILE: _9=&_ For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration In hand paid, C j2daNOWN11 .9 k49SMWA71WV C%ZA9AQ2;0V 4WD.-.19 psynop"KA17- - ("Grantor' herein), its successors and assigns hereby convoys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a Washington Corporation ('Grantee" herein), its successors and assigns for the purposes hereinafter set forth, a nonexclusive perpetual easement over, under, along. across and through the following described real property (*Property" herein) in M" County, Washington: SEEEXHIBIT"N' ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE APART HEREOF. EASEMENT LOCATION: Except �=y b rwise set forth herein, Grantee's rights shall be exercised th W a 'Leherein) that Is ton (10) feet In width having five ( feet of Ilia' ortlon of the Property AZ Mdthpon each side of the cerilA Ine of GranteWs systems located as constructed or to be construciv. extended or relocated on the Proper except those portions of the Property occupied by existing buliTing footings, foundations, and/or subsuNalce structures. 1. Purpose. Grantee shall have the fight to use the Easement Area to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace. improve. remove. and enlarge one or more utility systems for purposes of transmission, distribution and sale of gas and electricity. Together with the riphl of access over and across said Property to enable Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder. As used herein, me term *systems' shall Include all appurtenances and facilities as ara nacessafy, in Ilia judgmant of Grantee, for the opaFa:ion and maintenance of said systems. 2. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Grantor agrees not to erect any structures on said Easement Area, and lurther aqrees not to place trees. rockerim fences or other obstructions on the Property that would Interfere with the exercise of Grantee's rights herein. DATED this -1(o day of M a.&jfz .2003. GRANTOR: BY: zjll,� NOTE: SKMTURESAREREOUIFIED OF ALL 0G4MNERS OF PROPERTY BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )SS COUNTY OF On this — day of 2003, before me, a Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, duty commissioned and sworn, personally appeared M. -known to be the individual(s) who executed the within and foregoin inshument, and acknowledged to -me 9 _ that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this hereto alfixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in arid for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires N"y omit toz &-A an nwwcnz ffum be bakle I- mmon Cust form &rm 0 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF On this - day of 2003, before me, a Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, duty commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the individual(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that - signed the same as - free and volunmq act and deed for the use and purposed therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this hereto affixed the day and year In this certificate first above written. (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBILIC in and for the State of Washington. residing at f4 appointment expires MoUrf "SO. tW Wd 90 1 MMbDkd1d81-a=qb (CDWMTE ADNOWLEDW&Wn STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF On this 2 & dayof MAY 2003. before me. the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for the State of Washington. duly commissioned and swom, personally appeared 1_% VA f 10-0 Mi A, r2 : I a e , to me known to be the person who signed as 1V:c:4L Pkes.-A e M,4 of 5�a2omA D emir Igi. the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said Instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and dead of .15 (X .0 for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that was authorized to execute the said Instrument on behalf of said 'Sib rl a r .4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and Mcfal siall (Te day�nd yew first above written. SN Z "Al I L A :6 M �_N:A (Print or stamp name of Notary) FE NOTARY PQXU;4n,,arr t4 n, late of Wjhin to makfing at .,A 2000 My appointment expires 4-glo, I I Not" S.M Ze, nr . ....... (30ME REPREWUATIK CAPAOM STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF On this - day of 20M. before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, i;�cor�mlsslanedl and swom, personally appeared - and to me known to be the individual(s) who signed as of I the that executed the within and ioregoing instrument. and acknowledged said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act an * d ' dead and the free and voluntary act and deed. of for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated ithat was authorized to execute the said Instrument an behalf `of-:'.,saJd IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my had and official seal the day and year first above written. (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBILIC in and for the State of Washington. residing at My appointment expires N"y sod. wd wW an mtakm aug be' V. a& QM fom WIM 9 0 EXHIBIT 66A" Lots 2, 3 and 4 of City of Edmonds Short Plat No. SP S-2000-82, recorded under Snohomish County Recording No. 200301175001, records of Snohomish County, Washington, Being a portion of Lots 47 and 48, RICHMOND PARK, Division 2 as recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, page 12 Records of Snohomish County, Washington, located in a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 36, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M. E10 A POATION OF THE SE F THE SW 1/4, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NWH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS SP S-2000-82 Q TIFICATION DEDICATION = %&== =--= - - OPe,t deoolbod ono J7;."I _'�D.oe _ _ - , "+ MAINTENANCE. OPERATION. REPAIR Anee AND/OR AS INTENDED IN S DECL_RD, , to ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND LABOR REOIXNED TO -MTAIN A STABLE AND trLE ROAD SURFACE FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SAID TRACT StIO I ON ON THS PLAT COST 0" SAID uAINTEN CE. OPERATION AND REPM AN AND/Da RE,a,STR= r. 6.�' EQUALLY AND LWAL DESCRIPTION ja`TLY By THE o"'ERS' "'at' "ERS. S-CCESSOIM ANI) ASS�EES. OF SAID LOTS 2_3. INIOD. MAINTENANCE. oPERIncOL PAIN. ANc,/OR RECONSTRUCrk S N DoS DEMARAIMIL �, To A It, -M "L OF ALL NECESSAR A TA,.AA S,=D Y WATERIALS"IND LABOR REQUIRED To W A,: USABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEM I-t No A Z=MAGE CASEUENT. THE �T or AINTENANM OPERA SH SAID M� IRIOM ON TNIS PLAT AND 0"'n"D :0RECCAS ALL ALSO E BORNE EOU�l AND, T`=ErR1�S:,CC=S. -1 -1 A OF -1 to - .— - - 0, �TL T 8V THE COPIERS, An,, AssmuEES. W SAID LOTS811-4. Mw NINFI.- IAST A HOLD HARMLESO AGREEMENT A OF I— -d I I-= ":-9 :7., ,opooe�n, __,_%, In I_ _oo .1 .1 IWON A TO NOQ .1.1-ANCINP-of --- on' I ben to,nendl Inen b7heId Onn,eee On Pe"== My **to t,,I-oqL In. Cn, W -1 or in)-th. .$of N, or notebente, �nw 11.1 In. Nt.l. to "On.-t"el one""On on �Ionon- Of the = PI- ond 1 Mn, ond I— me Oty of E,_, ono M'y bOnt Ony ond on dolm, to, benngoo, 9 donnPIP -- obety by - ect or eMeMon t in)-tOle"O' en� or Nue,' by opeo'I_ w onto, TRACT A OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT 1. Ione TRACT A SHALL BE NEW IN EOU� AND tINDIVIDED INTEREST ITT LOTS 3 & .. SAID (TIONERS OF LOTS 3 T�CN HORS, SU 4. CCESSORS. AND ASSIGNEES. SHALL BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED MTN CWXRS..p OF TRACT A. "an"....' No NOTA8Y 0 INTMESS bNOXOF - Ind ond ancle. CONDITIONS Conollonc. MIJ, OR of me oOnN,no of Oppnoeci fo,,nd In "'It fbet' OPPetnot Of the ~t mbdMlm ond On, --. -0. A W all .1 t— PION M ... —1 IOO,nod in Re S-20DO-82 M In, Mbee , 1,,0 Non,. None APPROVED AND AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION By Steve ot THIS DAY OF %1*1 200-9 C-ty 0 A,Neta4 I NuP . none obtletneue, 0N,' ZA"D AUINORIZED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF P S a MAufiec 03.,rNVrSeAe L DIVISION BY ditnel ode M&=Ont Got GOINNIONOfted It to be (ft�IAO,) no, On. THIS /!5- DAY OFJ4Ff91gT2OO.3 'elvetee, 0,O-ond--tenent, -61 .—I. �Iod Oeinbe, I.. 200z spoeene'e I .r'44 . �a % Ie ;A-Y Mth n 6 e-e I-= C �32�BINL It, on Lote z 3 -on be Sloto Of 4. �A 3�=�'MN" PNP "Oo 00 Inee"'ltoo Mt- -Y 'e"Nong 11 he eInV* fonoy co-, 2. I that I I,eee lene oettefact" eAd- unn, 5�' '=�A "" Be 'W w"w onot be ��= OreMn �_ W [CDC Smtlon 20.159. n,b, wee �Opod .- Ine,ept he On —1 to LOT 4. At wOneo ob, tee I ono It to be (neelh.) kee 0. COncIftim' It nPreo,Ot 1 be *,M � IN, �d in Ino one, OPPnO e, the ~t �In, w !w_aM._ and ov,weew neotioned In - In—, 1�to* � no S-2000-52. 7. At In, plw,on W _t el. In. .1-Ing oeg1noo,1,9 d"w"ont, to OAIWI thb, &moN_ Tleeo tnet we not horode IN, ft-wm%- by Unt Pkening DooneonOnt It, noNko, to be enneen III, .1 un, w. PIM ponIon-Te ~ IN, prot-tod Mut Th. thete, OneP ~ Not . _wted by . -belote edthin Me IMP 96, III NO, — It- - Ont, on I of me v��TNI P'ne'deg 01"m neen Oppone, thene Pnotte" — gele, to Oned"11. Ily ow.-on,ol -wee c9op3arlb-aw Page I of 2 _�ECGRDER'S CERTIFICATE ............... I SURVEYOR'S CERWICATE 101i I SUARMW FORk. JBMF Consulting Engineers for '-d M _17.�! de, .1 MM WMAL ne, nottacts. A In, . On — John B. Frbk PE PLS bo* —=—.I �_ M one, ��_"7 tbe netteet a Sonoma Development 10303 NE 190th St PO BOX 27 EVERETT - 05206 Bothell, WA 98011 (425) 7�-3592 20' po N..;0 K-0 A PORTION OF THE SE I THE SW 1/4, SECTION 3e, TOW�NSHIP 27 N RANGE,3 EAST, W.M. I OF EDMONDS SP S-2000-82 - -t F-d 10'.-1I.d T..k L.W dip D. FEET) 1 20 15, , 4. 4�" 30' 30' Lot 4 11.256 .1 Lot I 12,eap f Ift- 'g Lot 3 E,- a.95a e E—t � Wt I Is' U E-t k Lot 2 k - "zr 8.115 V Traot A k LEGEND 4,047 f -T q = � (RE!� CAP) 30' F V� T�& = 1=5 . S'� 2'.2- 56.94V At' 86.69, J FOUND W NV N ow— 206.39' FOUND W Pogo 2 of 2 LE�. 0.2' RECORDER'S CERMCATE SURVEYOR'S CERnFICATE SURVE FOR: J13MF Consulting Engineers —0 W d., .'1JMk'f)20Va Jollm B. Mel, PE PLS b� - .1 -. t P.g. d M. '�Nw f T1.1E ".1.Z wl—zlpx Sonoma Development AMOM ---wjU*2L— 10303 NE 190th St EVEREPTOT. OWXA 271.12 Bothell, WA 98011 25) 771- 2 0M 'V. V S.L f R—W HUM 1 0.. C 2002 1- - 20' Ou,4. or it-#, oc%., i ium zo. I uyvivanor ei mun i n, nouvie ... I, CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTARY N WNESS WEREW C"ty *t'7-- wd- Ww- st- w �tv m 1;-h -Ar M. 11 : v mi, tz r :,- '--, - , -- - , " —tk= Z; ' b.'l ZX:L P� My 'pp— MW N ENT I OAM ENaINEEM0 DEPARTMENT ,nr —1 A 1& $'2. RXT. *A E� INGWRM 0EPMMWT DAM HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT CONDMONS CERTTFICATION NOTES RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ................... 4.1 . - mor- .7f 1. L E -Dal— R—ft SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE �Y FM. I Sonoma De�eloprnent PO Box 572 Bothell. WA 98041 EXACIA SURVE-VING SERVICE LAISRENCE F. IXXON, PLS M7 8M �t SEATFLL � Wil 5 (205) 365—M70 — I .V.1 V& 2= 1 1' - 2cr O"!t""T SCALE (- —1) RECORDER'S CERIMCATE ................... SE 1/4, 0/4, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANO EAST, W.M. R 46 1.61 SURVEYOR'S CERTIMATE Y FM _r So�omo Development PO Box 572 Bothell. WA 98041 LEGEND x — — — — — — — — --- — - EXACTA SURVEYING SERVICE LAMENCE F. DIXON. PLS w27 am �—n �Tnr_ — "I's (ma) —T27, TUBBSQ@@0C08M8a SJ�EET FILE. RECEIVED January 9, 2004 MAR 18 2004 Greg Hale Construction, Inc. E 16605 - 7 1 st Place West P RMIT COUNTER Edmonds, Washington 98037 Geotechnical Engineering Report Residential Property 10300 Block of 242' Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. HAL2-01' INTRODUCTION This letter presents our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical conditions pertinent to proposed residential development of your property located in the 10300 block of 242 nd Place West in Edmonds, Washington. Our services have been performed at your request and in accordance with our services agreement dated December 16, 2003. The subject property consists of Lot 4 of Short Subdivision S-2000-82. We understand that you propose to develop the property to include one single family residence. You have asked us to evaluate geotechnical conditions within the property as a basis for providing you with information and recommendations pertinent to the proposed development. Specifically, our scope of services includes: 1. Review of published geologic and topographic information regarding the subject site and adjacent areas.. 1. Surface geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas. 3. Subsurface investigation of soil conditions at the site by means of test pits excavated by a backhoe and operator you provided. 4. Preparation of this geotechnical engineering report providing our observations relative to geotechnical conditions at the site and providing our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical elements of the proposed development. Our services have been provided on the basis of a review of existing information a flable to us, geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas during December 2003, vai observation of test pit explorations on December 19, 2003, discussions with you and Mr. Gary S. Cooper, and our experience. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-M-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS The property is located between 104' Avenue West and 242 n, Place SW in Edmonds, Washington as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. As shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2, which is -based on a drawing dated 4-2-02 by JBMF Consulting Engineers, the subject property consists of a Lot 4, located in the northwest part of the shortplat and adjacent to 104th Avenue West. Our Critical Areas Evaluation report dated April 10, 2002 for the area of the short plat that includes the subject property, described topographic, vegetative and prior development conditions within the area of the short plat. Since that report was submitted, the area of the short plat has been cleared and graded to create three building pads, driveways accessing the three lots have been constructed and paved, and storm and sanitary side sewers have been installed. Site grading included construction of a keystone block wall and two rockeries. Recommendations for design and construction of these improvements was not included in. either our previous or.present scope of services. We understand that the existing rockeries will be reconstructed based on recommendations by others. Geologic conditions within the area of the short plat were also described in our earlier report. As part of our present services we explored subsurface conditions within.the area of the short plat via six test pits, including three test pits within the subject property, excavated at the locations indicated on the Site Plan. A description of the subsurface exploration program and the logs of the test pits are presented in the Appendix. The observed subsurface conditions are consistent with those described in our earlier report. The subject property is .underlain by glacial outwash consisting of sand and gravel deposited during the advance and retreat of the last glacier to occupy this area some 13,500 to 15,000 years ago. Local patches of glacial till, deposited directly by the glacial ice, exist within the area of the short plat but none was observed within the subject property. Some fill locally exists within the site. Because of the high infiltration capacity of the surficial soils, little or no surface 'water runoff occurs with in the site, and no emergent groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits, on the slope adjacent to 104'hAvenue West, or elsewhere within the site. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-M-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The subject property is suitable for the proposed residential development provided that proper site development procedures and the recommendations below are followed. The native soils underlying the site consist of glacial outwash sand and are suitable for conventional residential foundation design and construction procedures. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK We recommend that all sod, organic soil, fill and debris be removed from settlement sensitive areas (e.g., building, pavement and slab areas). The subgrade surface in slab and pavement areas should be proof -rolled with heavy rubb er-tired equipment after excavating to the desired grade. The purpose of the proof -rolling is to bring the near -surface soils to a uniform density and to identify any loose areas which might require recompaction or removal and replacement with structural fill. Temporary cut slopes for foundation excavations are expected to be as much as ten feet in height. Temporary cut slopes in the medium dense to dense native soils may be inclined as steeply as IH:IV and, except for minor sloughing, can be expected to stand at that inclination for a period of several weeks if protected from drying. Temporary cut slopes in existing loose or fill soils may be inclined as steeply as 1.5H:lV if protected from drying. Protection from drying applies to natural soil moisture only. Do not add water to temporary cut slopes to improve stability. If steeper temporary cut slopes are required we should be consulted to develop shoring recommendations. We understand that you anticipate new permanent cut slopes up to 6 fe et in height within the eastern portion of the subject property, and rockery walls for erosion protection of those slopes. If rockery walls are used for this purpose, we recommend that they be no more than 6 feet in height, and that the toe of the rockery (see Figure 3) be located above a plane sloping 45 degrees downward from any adjacent property line and from any existing bu ried utilities. Cut slopes faced by rockery walls shall be no closer than 3 feet to the edge of storm or sanitary sewers, or a greater distance if required by the sewer district. If higher cut slopes are required we shall be consulted to provide other recommendations for slope protection. STRUCTURAL FILL All new fill in settlement -sensitive areas shall be placed as compacted structural fill after the site has been prepared as described above. All structural fill material shall be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. The suitability of 7505-A West Lake Sammamish'Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-M-4850 www.tubbs..com . 0 Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 4 material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil.. As the amount of fines (material passing No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve. Structural fill shall contain no more than 5 percent fines for placement.in wet weather. The percent fines can be higher for placement i n dry weather, providing that the fill material is moisture -conditioned as necessary for proper compaction. The sandynative outwash soils at the site are suitable for structural fill. Structural fill placed in building or pavement areas shall be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. Utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent, except for the.upper 2 feet which shall be compacted to 95 percent. We recommend that structural fill be placed in loose layers not more than 8 inches thick if a small vibratory roller compactor is used (or not more than 12 inches if a 10-ton or larger vibratory roller compactor is used), conditioned to the proper moisture content for compaction, and uniformly compacted before placing subsequent layers. FOUNDATION SUPPORT The proposed residence can be supported on conventional spread and strip footings founded on firm native soil, or can be supported on structural fill directly overlying firm native soil. Footings may be proportioned using an allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot. This value applies to the total of dead plus long term live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. This value also assumes a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous spread footings and 24 inches for isolated spread footings. The minimum depth of embedment below final adjacent grades is 18 inches for exterior footings and 12 inches for interior footings on firm native soil. Footings adjacent to a downhill slope shall be sufficiently deep to provide at least 6 feet of horizontal separation between the footing and the slope face, and shall be sufficiently deep or distant from the slope that a 1:1 plane extended from the edge of the footing does not intersect the slope face. Because loca I areas of loose soil may be encountered at the same level as the medium dense to dense soils, we recommend that the soils beneath the footings be compacted using han.d operated vibratory equipment in lifts as described above. Any loose or disturbed soils in the footing excavations, including any test pit backfill, should be recompacted prior to concrete placement. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 5 Floor slabs can. be supported on grade if site preparation is accomplished as previously recommended, or can be supported by structural fill directly o verlying firm native soil. The subgrade soils should be proof -rolled as recommended above and compacted using vibratory equipment or replaced. with compacted structural fill if loose areas are observed. A base course layer consisting of a minimum thickness of 4 inches of clean gravel containing no more than 5 percent fines should be placed beneath the floor slab to provide uniform support and a capillary break. FOUNDATION RETAINING WALLS The basement walls for the proposed residence function as retaining walls and shall be designed as such. Assuming that the walls that are allowed to deflect 0.01 times the height of the wall, we recommend an active lateral pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming level backfill compacted and drained as outlined below. If the backfill surface slopes no steeper than 2H: IV percent upward away from the wall, a lateral soil pressure value of 60 pcf should be used. Resistance to lateral footing loads can be developed both thr ough friction on the base of the footings and passive pressures along the sides. Friction resistance on the base of the footing be computed using an intemal soil friction angle of 30 degrees. Passive soil pressures may be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot, providing the backfill around footings is compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557). These resistance values include a factor of safety of about 1.5. The above lateral soil pressures assume the walls will be backfilled with clean, free - draining sand or sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). This drainage zone should be at least 18 inches thick horizontally. The drainage material and remaining backfill placed behind the wall and not supporting structural elements should be compacted to approximately 90 percent of the maximum dry density. Heavy compaction equipment should not be operated within 3 feet of the retaining walls; no compaction tests will be necessary within 3 feet of the walls. A permanent subsurface drainage system should be installed at the base of all subsurface walls. These subdrains should consist of rigid, smooth -wall, 4-inch-diameter (minimum) perforated PVC pipe, nonwoven filter fabric such as Mirafi drainage product or equal, and surrounded by pea gravel or well -graded gravelly sand or sandy gravel with less than 3 percent fines (soil finer than the No. 200 mesh sieve) based on the fraction smaller than 3/4 inch. The drainpipes should discharge into tightlines sloped to drain by gravity to 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 6 the existing storm sewer system. Roof drains shall not discharge into the footing drain system. SITE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL We understand that the City of Edmonds requires water to be routed through an on - site infiltration trench prior to being conveyed to the storm 'sewer system. We recommend that the bottom of the infiltration trench be sufficiently deep and distant from. any adjacent downhill slopes so as to meet the setback requirements specified above for footings. We recommend that water from footing drains be routed directly to the storm sewer via a tight line. If the footing drains must be routed through the infiltration trench, the outlet from the infiltration trench to the storm sewer shall be at an elevation at least'3 feet lower than the footing drains in order to avoid the possibility of water from roof drains backing up into the footing drain system. The surficial soils within the subject property are susceptible to potential erosion and shallow debris slides if disturbed by construction or other activities. Erosion controls are therefore recommended, including the proper control of surface water runoff, minimizing the time of exposure in the area stripped during construction, and prompt revegetation. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for Greg Hale Construction, Inc. and its representatives for use in planning, permitting and designing residential development of Lot 4. Descriptions of subsurface conditions relative to foundation support and other aspects of the proposed development are based on surface observations and shallow subsurface explorations, and conditions should be confirrhed by observations in the excavations at the time of construction. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices followed in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty, expressed or implied, should be understood. 7505-A West Lake Sammamlsh Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Greg Hale Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 7 We trust that this report meets your present needs. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. V" N� Donald W. Tubbs Nf S. WA f I EXPIRES: 12/24/04 Document ID: HAL201RI Yours very truly, Tubbs Geosciences Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Engineering Geologist Enayat S. Aziz, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering consultant to Tubbs Geosciences 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com T1 e %v t? 's Sc 1. 7 A", 71 fit f at kr%l c em SEA 7v no JL j VN TUBBS(3(@(DOO9O@nc@8 VICINITY MAP FIGURE I m I cn 12 9 GRAPHIC SCALE d— Dw k— —d U. ft 'r CP — ftw.~ � '* — a-cp Pt. -d --A t. ce *I V 0 OWGINA& EXCA%JA-.T%04 ONLi 8* M I N -TH ICKNE% 4'- r QUARRY 5 Mus "'Z WASHED ROM AS PILTEE FABILIC AS Rockery walls shall be constructed of rocks in the following size categories: Two -man rocks (300 to 600 pounds), 13" in least dimension; Three-man rocks (800 to 1200 pounds), 16" in least dimension; Four -man rocks (1500 to 2200 pounds), 18 " in least dimension. The rock material shall be hard, sound, durable and free from weathered portions, seams, cracks, and other defects. Rocks should be as tabular in shape as possible; rounded or very angular rocks shall be avoided. The larger rocks shall be placed at the base of the wall. Four -man rocks shall be used for the bottom course in walls higher than 6 feet. The lowest course of rocks shall be keyed into firm foundation material at least 12 inches below the adjacent grade. Rocks shall be selected and placed to minimize void space between rocks. Rocks shall be placed in a manner such that the long axis of the rock is normal to the face of the wall. To the greatest extent possible, rocks shall be placed with faces in contact; point contact shall be avoided. Inclining interfaces between rocks shall slope downward toward the back of the wall. After setting each course of rock, voids between the rocks shall be chinked on the back with quarry rock to eliminate any voids larger than two inches across. ROCKERY WALL SCHEMATIC TUBBSGROOMMOSO I FIGURE 3 0 APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS The subsurface conditions within the subject site and adjacent areas were explored by excavating six test pits with a track -mounted backhoe on December 19, 2003. The te st pit locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The locations are approximate and were estimated in the field based on site features shown on the Site Plan. The explorations were backfilled with the excavated material and compacted with the backhoe bucket. The test pits were continuously monitored by an engineering geologist from our firm who observed the materials encountered, noted ground water conditions and maintained a detailed log of each exploration. The soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the classification system shown in Figure A- 1. The test pit logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-3. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUPNAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE GRAINED GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVEL on No. 4 Sieve SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAN6 More Than 50% Retained on SID POORLY -GRADED SAND No. 200 Sieve More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES Sc CLAYEY SAND No. 4 Sieve FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC SOILS CL CLAY Liquid Limit Legs Than 50 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50% INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit 50 or More ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TUBBS8800MOSM61% I FIGURE A-1 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND CLASSIFICATION SURFACE SYMBOL DESCRIPT10N (FEET) TEST PIT TP-1 011.0 SP Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 1.0-4.0 SM Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwashl 4.0-5.0 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwashl 5.0-7.0 SM Gray silty sand with some gravel (very dense, damp) [Vashon till] 7.0-9.0 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt (very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage obs erved TEST PIT TP.2 0.0.5 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 0.5-1.5 SP Brownish gray gravelly sand with trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash] 1.5-3.5 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwashl 3.5-5.5 SM Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vashon advance ourwashl Bottom of test pit at 5.5 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBS0@oac00@nC@8 I I FIGURE A-2 46 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET) SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP-3 0.2.5 SP Brown sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots, some construction debris (loose, damp) (fill] 2.5-3.5 SP Gray sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots, some construction debris (medium dense, damp) [fill] 3.5-4.0 sm. Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [buried topsoil] 4.0-7.0 sm Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) rVashon recessional ourwash] 7.0-9.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-4 0-0.5 SP Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 6.0-3.0 SP Brownish gray sand with trace of gravel, some silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional ourwash] 3.0-6.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/0 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBS 8@02C O'Snoft I I FIGURE A-3 2 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET) 0-3.5 3.5-4.5 4.5-7.0 0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-6.0 6.0-7.0 SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP.5 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [fill] SM Reddish brown silty sand with trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional ourwash] SP Medium brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recesssional outwashl Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-6 SM Medium grayish brown silty sand with some gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [fill] SM Dark brown silty sand with trace of gravel, some roots ( medium dense, damp) (buried topsoil] SP Medium grayish brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash) SP Brownish gray sand with some silt, some gravel (dense to very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash]. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT TUBBS(ftozMancea LOG OF TEST PIT I I FIGURE A-4 I ANI �'l City 011 RIGHT -OF -WAY -CO Permit No: IIAWN Edmondsli qSTRUC. '.16N PERMIT Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 4�1_444R kolk*_ B. Typp of Wor k (be specific): Qqc'nt ILI 1 /0 - 4-e-1- V-N I L_ Contact: C. Contractor.. Nlailing Address: V_3_1�' Phone: State License #: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ City Business License #: D. Building Permit # (if applicable Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. Commercial 0 Subdivision El City Project El EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, ST, O..VWSD) 6mc n Multi -Family Single Family Other INSPECTOR: F PAVEMENT CUT: El YES ANO G. SIZE OF CUT x CONCRETE CUT: YES WN 0 G. Mail Approved Permit Call for Pickup APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN, INDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or,4nforesee , that may be made against the City of Edmonds or aqy of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTIOI� AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED B Y CITY FORCES, A T WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engiluer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-1551-'�05 and must(have certifiAtion verifying completion of the required training in the'ir possession. Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to th� end of the workday —,-.NO * EXCEPTIONS. Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HA VE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THATIMUST KETHEPINKC0 "Y THE PERMITA VAILABLE ON SITE A TALL TIMES FOR N ECTIONS Date:ylla d;44- Signature:= �Ar"_ 0 (Contractor or Agent) 'U F 'CITY 0 ' R SE-ONLY,::�.' -of- -F A,pprovedby: r�i 1� 4_6u. )"4'! V Right #,ay ie: Time AuthorizeJ-_"�nid After _D121-011, oisru /F` poon. ee, vnd'114i' Special, Conditions: CnA.4rEA-64 -rt) I/ Nt, 9 Ar Q r 7 A A&& tnsp"tion"-Fee.,? re- 4��& 4(�-_- rne E 9*r-w =E2 Iia:,r A^jq4a Alf 7-7-1� se Total.F�e�-.* ;�'2-4757, Receio No: 17, MC * /Kir-AC-C 7*vf)A_.s I i xj,-r - AjCJZo-k?,r 'DA%1 rio -rNr i4J,;7,- DE 0 NCP-cCr1C,^4 S7-AieT -Amn 46N,L) J)�-_ T r7-- REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: r/ 77P /xs,>,-er/fty r)MAI P-CAA1 CaU 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326for a 24-hour vo�i�cTcpr ed inspection request line. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: DAT& I941'ectork-Signature C-0 NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE CADocuments and SettingsTunis\My Documents\Fonns\Engnrng\ROWpermit_.doc Revis—eit"0/01/03 ATE RECEIVED PERMIT EXPIRES 4/)- *1 CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT d � 7 ZONE fZ�:�e NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB ADDRESS jo SUlTE/APT# OWNER NAMENAME 0 rL C-C Cz BUSINESS LM CO C: T 10 A 0, T" C PLAT4rAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT N LID NO. LID FEE z 31: 0 MAILING ADDRESS 0.5 -71 LJ PUBLIC RP4T OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP 41AL1111z EXISTIN PROPOSED — REQUIRED DEDICATION— Fr TIESCIP 9pproved 131 RW Permit Required 13 Street ijae pabn4ifleq -d a !"d inspecdariReq U Wiring required 13 CITY zip 00)j TELEPH ONE 15 METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURESr PRV"'RE'QUIRED YES �`!`. NO 13 .- X ADDRESS CWK REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE z W-C, n00 t 9 UP kN (Q 32nkfz'. CITY ZIP TELEPHONE IC 0 4) NAME CBL# 113� ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY r 4 ADDRESS A,4 o A INJ FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE rL CITY ZIP Aj 0-4 ka 0 0 10 TELEPHONE zowt- -450 VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADS# INSPECTION REO'D 0YEs BOND POSTED1 ST*E LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE 0* V--t-(;j4e- 102-2TO J?-/"!V CHECKE B $EPA REVIEW COMPLETE I EXEMPT EXP SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED. HEIGHT I ALLOWED I PROPOSED 2.5 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. oo NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH ADDITION . COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR 1:1 CHANGE OF USE REMODEL 0 MULTIFAMILY 0 SIGN [3 FENCE REPAIR CYOS x FT) LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED 35% 13, Left. REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr.) FRONT SIDE REAR 75 7.43 157, PROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.) FRONT URSIDE REAR A -4 1�4#, z PARKING REC?D I PROVID JD 7— 2- 1"'Z54"I LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED a I Y DATE REMARKS o OTHER DEMOLISH 13 TANK ire A GARAGE RErAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER CARPORT ROCKERY FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) CHECKED BY -MAJ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION _IV V jCQ0E C171- OCCU GROU NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS CRMCALtrjL"kV AREAS NUMBE SPECIAL INSPECTION JAREA REQUIRED JX YES I ��,Fr o2 OCCUPANT LOA . 0, DESCRIBE WORK.TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D r —,.\ . % I k , I - f /I VALUATION 1!5r nxn� a lo 47/,0,9r Am Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge �/ HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % — T Building Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: Ine-z" 45ac;� VESTED DATE . Plumbing. 44g — L..;./ ., Mechanical — 1 THIS PERMlirr AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO 1= BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading I DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, mAniouiEEs, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review. tr In PERMIT APPUCATION: 1180DAYS . 0( PERMIT'LIMM I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK 18 STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection q ASp. SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT,FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT., OfCREHALE 010-HIS+ HER SPO EIRSI, A§SI P AND UCCESQRS UgE,.� bF Fire Revie� _Ran Chk. P.eposit IN INTEREST, AGREES q'ro INDEMNIFY, DEFtNUAND HOLD HA MLESS . HE cify 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS.4MPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER: NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY X, FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THI&PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE a DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapelnsp. Total Amt. Due 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY-TkE crrirs ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION. - Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE IN06RMATION GIVEN IS CORRE"AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF- APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THEWORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL'SE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOL#ff ION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMYP'S COMPE�IrTION)PSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OWN R.A —jDAfE SIGNED 1A95 0ZFFIG U ATE 771 -0220 qle# oRfLEA5kD BY 0 ATTE ION EXT .1333 11T IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL C& A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- GATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 OR GINAL - FILE E104R P:NK - OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 04/02 GREEN - ACCOUNTING PRESS HARD -YOU AREMAKING 5 COPIES I If I I t4 I ADI(It sumiii6 oil I!" x I!- 14 GA, WOW. fAIRIC W x P, WINIP Imf Z I I:QUjVAIJ.NT Owner: Greg.Hale Const. Inc. Address: 16605 71 st PI. W. LOT COVERAGE Lynnwood Wa. 98037 LOTAREA= 11256 S.F. Ph. (206) 650-0699 UIOUSE& DECKS = 1550 S.F. J�0!81`F, k;-r005550-000-047 C6VE�AGE 1550/11256 13.77% -02 Lot 4 P�rtY,'>x 0 4, A," I U. If R I AVRII- IiAICRIAI IN Edidondi Wa. 98020 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES III ALL J/41 15' WASULIJ 4WAVIA. IN "'U"IMMS ME Sj,^LS fli 111011,31 ANO TIN WITIJ SIQFS 10 UR WIRE R1144S To ATIM31 f 11 UX fAITRIC FOCT IN TIC SUWm;t.-,. MWIC To Wm. HOUSE, EAVES & PATIO = 1800 S.F., DRIVEWAY& WALKS= 1124 S.F. TOTAL = 2924 S.F. 0 3 WIRE MLS11 SU11,111141 v I I SUI"IRT FILTER F Nt-�- t %9 corq-�-Owk r) a It, WIN q fN Q P Y I 4r L %I J, . I ? 1 N8, . j ill x ill 140111) 111srs Im EQUIVALENT 4y Lo A> 11,01 WASHED RLxx MAIL Y\ A? 'Ile CAJQI BASIN ""Aw 357 - 0 I PLACE' WL!iN es Q - NU GRAIC IV 1 -ACI 1 11 -1 I-R I 0"I"IFMA) I :I , 4 IWICS 1 #1611 AR010ND CATCII BASIN III VILIUR WATCR. "POCK, S- v- Gy STRAW " ES HAY W USED IN ULRIAIN CIRCL)NSFAN(;Ls (SLE DETAIL ELM) U1qjN AM"VAL IW CITY I:WIWCR OR "IS REPRIESIVINTATIV1% 44J IIIS A111111 JCAIJUN SIIALL BE' "AINIAINLO AV AIA. IIWS BURINIj C- C) -t-\ i.-CF11IN RE IN A I. k0bSiON 6*iki W= aws Wig I AN K(� 1:11 � IN.%'i 'M WA% �4 Z GX I C ikAw �sp lscc— � —7q 10C. pjoc cfo C)Q va -5� - Cf2 0v e2 -TC) 710 09 -5ro -y L(3 AMR bp C,)Uvr -21 Cp v? RECEIVE 45' 4e 4z, MAR 15 2004 41 10 GRADING CALCULATIONS ..LEDGEND: 41, PLOTPLAN PERMIT COU ER v Scale: 1/8 = I Foot CUBIC YARDS CUT 305 y4N /V�, -q CUBIC YARDS GRADED = 140 EXISTING GRADE --------- FINISH GRADE TOTAL CUTIGRADE 445 SILT FENCE 77 I It 1 I-N 1 AIIIIH S1,4AIRIB fit i�l x I!, 14 6A. WHIF. f AIWA: x V, %1191" 1IR Owner: Gregliale Const. Inc. Address: 16605 71-41 P1. W. LOT COVERAGE LOTAREA = 11256 S.F. Lynnwood Wa. 98037 & DECKS = 1550 S.F. Ph. (206) 650-0699 HOUSE Tax Parcel: 005550-000-047-02 Lot 4 COVERAGE 1550/11256 = 13.77% Property Address: 24219 104'h Ave. W. 1 11 Ifff (ABRII; "AICRIAI IN Edmonds Wa. 98020 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES III AIA. 3/41 Ue WASIN.11 GWAVJ�I. IN RULLS. USE STAKCS Ili 1HEM11 AND TJN MHTIj SIMS III' ATTAQJ IN WOW f 11. fIX FAIWIG I'F.NLT IIN TIC 4UWm;j.% VANIC To WWI HOUSE, EAVES & PATIO = 1800 S.F.. DRIVEWAY& WALKS= 1124 S.F. Moat: 0 FILTER FA um Tsut"IRI it ilic TOTAL 2924 S.F. 6 III S C (17 COPA . ...... .... . -1-1 .. . ... VINY 0111111" t*' I RAN 49 111 1� fN J 6? C? 4 0 EQUIVALENT ill x ill WIND 111sts IN 44 LP h'0' WASHED RLU 6RAII >\ VAUWC� T 4. IK A W I I TIMOR -t- VAXA'A' N C I'LAUL I It, I ER I AMIC HE I WVFN f RAW ANU MAIL'. III -ACE' 7/111 VASW.0 6RAVfI. 3 -4 INCI*:S JjI(i#I AR(X)ND III Vif-UR WATCR. CA'ICIJ BASIN WIN Al"11VAI. I*' CITY I:WIWCR IIR NIS RUpRCSUNfAyIVj% C--r STRAW IIAI , FS HAY BE USUB IN CLRIAIN CIRCUMStANCLS (suV DETAIL U.1.1) 4 IIIIS AN141CA1111" NIIAI.t. HE HAINIAINLU AT AIA. IIWS BoRIm .7' CANIMCIIIIN PERRID. C-C) AA C6 un � IN.Viiii, I JuN RE,= (IN WKS W .1*1RIIL 4u WAS W.f WE .1F 7, q.. > o" 'S5 k �sp C"Cc- TA G, X Os C) K-- 0 0 1 f2 N 62 P, 5 ES' a 'J /'fo J, 00 (10 < (7), ------ x lr� 011 I.Dc- XT E NUD 11:� 1� (F �-)Ok C10,1_1 i0m() MI) 4� Iv 0 MAR 18 2004 PERMIT COU 45 44' NTEIT RECEIVEL) k 1"A kAK 10 GRADING CA-k.LCULATIONS .LEDGEND: PLOTPLAN CUBIC YARDS CUT 305 MAR 15'2004 Scale: 1/8 = I Foot '1�'Vceb ?'Lor— CUBIC YARDS GRADED = 140 EXISTING GRADE PERMIT Co f51-5- F-W-- .1 1 UNTER ---------- FINISH GRADE Opt '?LAW Ftn� AlAza%> TOTAL CUT/GRADE 445 SILT FENCE QVI; fkr 6#LC-5, Y, X -------------------- ------- ....................... ............ .......................................................................... ............................................................... I ........... ........................... .1 ..... ......... .............. I ............ .... .......................................... ...................... ................................. ................ . ............................................................................................................................................ ..... ...................... ............................... I ............................................................................. A -PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. '__1 0 GRAPHIC SCALE -20 0 10 20 40 2 I E`%-.*_-1I1,;,1] I"Md (IN FEET) 1 inch = 20 ft. In order to prevent storm water flowing down the slope, connect the existing 12" CP and downspout line to an 8" CPEP Pipe and connect to C8 #3. 3 4 er Mailboxes p 1 2 N Std Dtl. E8.7 IE 371.39 moss. .31 CB 7 5,3 V 0- U r 0 1 E_ -7-77,1 0 `,_� �OO 0 A 0 A of e z [F�6 + U j, A U V 5 00 014. A) y� \Proposed �44... 'j, Hou U �oca ion V R 2 0 B 4\ To� 352.VO 'Lo E3srdt 34�-50 B ervice/ Lpt It . .......... Lqt/ 4 L ------ / ---------- /J 12,1�89 �f 1 1�256 sf/ 7/ 7 EX. SSMH 0) RIM 32-2.3 N., U 6 VICINITY MAP SCALE 1 2000' LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 47 AND 48, RICHMOND PARK HOMES, DIVISION -NO. 2, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS, PAGE 12, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOTS 47 AND 48 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING A-T THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 47, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ACCEPTABLE MHTLINE THENCE SOUTH 62*50'16" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 47 A MATERK DISTANCE OF 90.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27*09',38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 123.93 FEET TO AN 40 rHI INTERSECTION' WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 47; 2:5 jo HAMM THENCE SOUTH 66*10'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF .12 FEET; THENCE NOR,rH 23*49'44" EAST A DISTANCE OF 147.82 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 48; THENCE NORTH 62'09'09" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1.61 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 47; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 47 BEGIN A CURVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 40 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF INUM RM 53.34 FEET "" THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Uri- SITUATE IN 1HE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 2.6 DATUM NAVID 88 IE 315.96 f Nall in Hower role %y NVV Uorner OT 1_01 40. r-lev: jib./o A 16 LLI APPLICANT > Sonoma Development f PO Box 572 � 01�1(1 0 Bothell, WA 98041 RIM FOW I-"— 2W K Faft ENGINEER 5URVEYQ'A E19j 0 T_ Exacta Surveying Service JBMF Consulting Engineers Vo John B. Friel, PE -�09 9827 8th Northeast 7P& a Seattle, WA /* ;�)8115 PO Box 27 (206) 365-0670 Everett, WA 98206 U > ......... . . . . . . . . . . , I >. 1 11'...... 1 SITE ADDRESS Lot Lot 3 10302 242nd IDL SW 8,953 sf ? 0 0 115 pf Edmonds, WA N D F2 �1- SHEET I E IMPERVIOUS AREA 0 :) A SHEET1 §ITE PLAN AND NOTES New Impervicus Area: 4471 SF It M I I ox/ p r/ SHEET2 PROFILES I rcd `i'D Y Et KEYED NOTES SHEET 3 PROFILES AND SECTIONS ni Replace 'Existing Yard Drain with a Type 1 Catch Basi n tr/ac� / / / A 4h647 f SHEET 4 PROFILE, DETAILS AND ESC NOTES [2] Trench Section per City of Edmonds Std. Drawing E4.2 V SHEET5 GRADING AND TESC PLAN n3 New Type 2-48" Catch Basin per Std. Drawing E5.3' A CB, SHEET 6 OWNERICONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 16 LF 12" CPEP SHORT PLAT MAP 41 EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 0 GMERS/DOWNSPOUTS [5] 50 LF Rack Wall, Sta 0+50 to 1+00 LT 8', Max Height 3' M CONNECT TO EXIST. 9M.-Sq-ork cf:, #2_ Provide, as necessary, a Concrete Block Wall to ensure Rock Wall to the 0 W 7t t -r F6] 14 0-0- P_w 0 i 0 — Ti.- - - A C 0 F,,- NW remains intact 4 ADLE TIGHTLINE MATEjjjAL SDR 35 [-7] 36 LF Rock Wall, Max Height 3' GENERAL NOTES PROJECT NOTES SCH 40 12 Standard Concrete Extruded Curb, per City of Edmonds Std Drawing E2.7 N F810 HANCOR 1) ALL ORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF 1) GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS FOR ALL NEW HOMES SHALL. BE TIGHTLINED AND EDMONDt_WSTANDARDS AND THE 2002 EDITION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CONNECTED TO THE NEAR!EST CATCH BASIN. ng 60 LF 12" RCP cc STANDAR D SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION (WSDOT/I'APWA). 2) ONE ADDITIONAL MAILBOX SHALL BE INSTALLED ON 104th AVENUE WEST PER R1O Remove Existing 12" Storm Drain Pipe 2) TEMPORARY EROSION/WATER POLLUTION MEASURES SHALL BE REQUIRED IN CITY OF EDMONDS STD. UWG E8.5. TWO ADDITIONAL MAILBOXES SHALL BE AU EXPOSED n1l 5' Asphalt Walkway per City of Edmonds Std. Drawing E2.12, ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE DOE MANUAL. INSTALLED ON 242nd PLACE SW PER CITY OF EDMONDS STD. DWG E8.7. SURFACEs 3) COM,PLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMITS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS BY THE CITY 13E COVERED WITHIN 2 To Standard Concrete Extruded Curb, per City of Edmonds Std Drawing E2.7 OF EDM NDS COMMUNITY SERVICES GROUP OR OTHER GOVERNING AUTHORITY OR 3) TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF EDMONDS DAYS AGENCAV TRAFFIC ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN THE RIGHTS -OF -WAY. CONTACT OLyMpC yjtW., 5' Asphalt Ramp 4) A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE HELD WITH THE CITY OF EDMONDS WATER/SEWEA DISTAW COMMUNITY SERVICES GROUP OFFICE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY 9e_f_� F-31 30' Standard Driveway Entrance per City of Edmonds Std. Drawing E2.26 5) ALL I STORM MAINS SHALL BE STAKED FOR GRADE AND ALIGNMENT BY JBMF PERMITS AND NOTIFY THE CITY 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. FA 104 LF 12" HDPE Drissco Pipe, butt fused. CONSULTING ENGINEERS OR AN ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR CAPABLE OF WATER 4061M PERFORMING SUCH WORK. 5) DRIVEWAY AND APPROACH RADII SHALL BE 10- UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6) STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: INSPECTIONS REqD 87 LF 112" CPEP U-1 CAU 425-771-0220 EXT. 1326 W g! 6) UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL F Ln A) REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO n16 44 LF 8" CPEP .4 M-170. EXPLORE AND LOCATE (BY DIAL -A -DIG) EXISTING LINES TO MAKE SURE OF 0 B) dORRIGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) WITH ASPHALT COATING CONFORMING TO LOCATION, DEPTH AND ALIGNMENT. THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND ENGINEER ARE 0 MAN[J'FACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SAID LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREIN. 36 LF Rock Wall, Max Height 3' I:= C� STEEL ALUMINIZED PIPE CONFORMING TO ITS MANUFACTURER'S STANDARDS. U ::- :E D !�TEEL PIPE CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C-151, THICKNESS cc uj CLASS SHOWN ON PLANS. 20 LF Rock Wall, Max Height 3', See Section on Sheet 4 a. FIRE AND AID ADDRESS SIGM REQUIRED E) POLYETHYLENE SMOOTH WALL PIPE PER ADS N-12 CONSTRUCTED PER 7) BUILDINGS ON LOTS 2, 3 AND 4 TO BE DEMOLITED. WSDO�/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 7-04. 8) FIRE AND AID SIGNS WILL BE PLACED AT THE ENTRANCE TO LOTS 2, 3 & 4. R19 132 LF Engineered Block Wall, Max Height 3', See Section on Sheet 4 (A 7) SPECIAL STRUCTURES, OIL/WATER SEPARATORS AND OUTLET CONTROLS Concrete Block Anchor, 25' O.C. per Detail on Sheet 4 SHALL B� INSTALLED PER PLANS AND MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 9) THE ENGINEERED BLOCK WALL PARALLEL TO 104th AVE W WILL NEED TO BE V1 8) CALL DIAL -A -DIG AT 1-800-424-5555 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENCED IN WASHINGTON STATE PRIOR 0 1 0 ANY EX AVATION. TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ON 104th AVE W. n2l 119 LF 12" CPEP 9) WHE"J�t CONNECTIONS REQUIRE "'FIELD VERIFICATIONS", CONNECTION POINTS WILL BE 1EXPOSED BY CONTRACTOR AND FITTINGS VERIFIED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO APPROVED AS NOTED 65 LF 12" CPEP CITY OF EDMONDS DISTRIBUTING SHUT-OFF NOTICES. BY ENGINEERING U) 10) CON, TACT OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT FOR SEWER 21 LF 12" CPEP INSPECTI NS AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR WATER SERVICE INSPECTIONS. APPROVED AS NOTED APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION GINEERING Date: 2)?�2 � I ( /o _5 /o 21 Date: CITY ENGINEER DATE .......................................... .... ................................................... ................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................... .. . .. ....... ..... ... . .. ......... ..... ...... ........................................................... ..... ..... . ....... ................................................................................ . ............ .................... ................. X _17 C r_ 0 0 E E 'a -0 W W V) 4- 4- z 0 0 0 0 0 L L. W q) 4) CL D_ .2 .0 0 (D Ix EX Cq N 0 1-1 0 -C� 6) Q) (P X IL Idd- W Q) tu %Q) ]A, Cq X A:: IL IL 41j ca 11=111111 LM C14 00 0 1 0 ,C 0 0 Aak V) C*j I cr) ro— co iL— 0 tj j .0) > 4) z V (j) al 0 co C 04 DRAWN: HMM DESIGNED: HMM APPROVED: JBF DATE: 4-2-02 PROJECT NO. E02-010 SCALE: 1 It = 201 SHEET 1 OF z 0 U X V) :2 0 r 0 z (n V) 0 z 0 Ij_ 0 IkI el A PORTION OF TKE &E 1/4 'OF THE SW 1/4p SECTION 36y TOWNSHIP 27 NORTHp RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. MONDS SP 8-2000-82 CITY EM 9 W 0 AT.1 QN. 11 we erify that are the legal owner(s) of the property described above and ACPAE.5 0 that this 0-1vision with the followingdedlco%ons. and conditions Is made m our free consent and according to my.1SLur esirt. our MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION, AS INTENDED IN THIS DECLARATION, APPLY TO A. A ��_ 1.2. ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND LABOR REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A STABLE AND USABLE ROAD SURFACE FOR Props ty Own's signature 14"*9 zlmllll�u&w. %ff INGRESS AND� EGRESS OF SAID TRACT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND IDENTIFIED ABOVE. THE COST OF SAID MAINTENANCE!, I OPERATION AND REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION SHALL ALSO BE BORNE EQUALLY AND JOINTLY BY THE OWNERS, THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNEES, OF SAID LOTS 2-3. TOTAL PARCEL MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, REPAIR, AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION, AS INTENDED IN THIS DECLARATION, APPLY TO LOTS� 47 AND 44. RICHMOND PARK HOMES. DIVISION NO. 2, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF.PLATS, PAGE 12, ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND LABOR REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A STABLE AND USABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEM RECORDS OF St401401419H COUNTY, WAGHNGTON; WITHIN SAID SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND IDENTIFIED ABOVE AS THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT. THE COST OF RX%PT THAT MARTI% OF SAID LOTS 47 AND 40 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SAID MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION SHALL ALSO BE BORNE EQUALLY AND COMMENCING AT THft WqST NORT.HX-MLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 47, THM TRUE POINT OF RE01 NING; THE-WOLr SOUTH 4Jt400 WEST ALING TH-9 NORTHERLY LINE OF SAJO LOT 47 A DtSITAKC11 JOINTLY BY THE OWNERS, THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNEES, OF SAID LOTS 1-4. 2 VIP .8 FEET; THENOC SOUTH ft'39" �AIIIT A 1:111TANCE OF 123.03 FEET To AN INT-MIRICTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 47; THEN -CC SOUTH U'I 0'18" EAST A WSTANCE OF 12 FEET; AMD H4 6 THENCE NORTH 23T40'44" EAST A DISTA14CE OF 147-82 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION NTH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 48; Owner, and all persons having any present or subsequent ownership in-terest, in these lands, and the THENCE N014TH 82109'09" WEST ALeNQ SA40 NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1.61 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 47; successors and assigns of owners or other parties having any sold Interest, hereby agree that the City of THE -NCR NORTR�E-STERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 47 QE N A QQR-VE TO THE NORTHWEST Edmonds shall be held harmless In all respects from any and all claims for damages for injunctive rellef HAVING A JS Or 40 FEET AN ARC DISTARCE OF 53.34 FEET TO THE .1-lit INT OF 111111AINNIN0. PO which may be occasioned now or In the future to adjacent land 'or Improvements by reason of the SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATIE OF WASHINOTON. construction, operation and maintenance of the drainage system and hereby waive and release the City of EXCEPTIONS Edmonds from any and all claims for damages, excluding damage caused solely by an act or omission of EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS TKEREOF: sold City and Injunctive relief which the owners, or their successors or assigns, may themselves have now Disclosed by� Statutory warrenty doed or In the future by reason of the construction, maintenance and operation of said drainage system. In favor of., Roy W. Ludwlg and Wilms J. Ludwig, him wife Purpose: Drainage and Acem Affacts; 3 feet In width lying southerly of the northwesterly ILRAGI A ... 0 W fi M�., "s line of sold Lot 47 Recordso: November 15, 1958 TRACT A SHALL BE HELD IN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST BY LOTS 3 & 4. SAID OWNERS OF LOTS 3 & R000rdIng Number: 1215298 4, THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNEES, SHALL BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOC ATED W TH OWNERSH P 0 TRACT A. I I F COVENANTS, 0ON131*110149, REM1011ONS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT- Recordeth Octolaer 22, ING$ Recording Numbar: 12142303 ,NOTABX -W IM IN M?MESS EREOF we set our hands end seals. Compliance with all of the conditions of approval found In the final approval of the short subdivision and sow a the attachments thereto. A copy of sold document is located In File S-2000-82 In' the office of the Name City of Edmonds Planning Divisions. Name Name APPROVED AND A1,JT[+0R!7ED FOR_ PPE Narne NarTii EDMONDS ENGI-NEERING DIVISION BY State of Washington A z THIS /!57 DAY OF \�W* 200-3 County of - Sol -hdAle."_ I certify that I know or have satisfactory avid -once that APP99VED AND AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF ED. AIAULLCI - Zjlervek NDS P DIVISION BY P signed this instrument and acknowledged It to be (b�/her) free and voluntary Get for the uses and purposes mentioned n the instrument. THIS DAY OF 2001 11 1 %flail q NOT" 1. Monuments visited October 14, 2002. Signature of Netary Public'' ud"M& Dated 1- 2. This field traverse survey was performed with a 6-second theodolite and electronic measuring unit. _G ". W Accuracy standard Is WAC 332-1,30-090. t My as 3. All structu es on Lots 2, 3 & 4 shall be removed. r State of Was on 4. A tree clearing/retention plan shall be submitted with any building permit for a new single family house County of on Lots 2, 3 and 4. 0 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 5. Tract A and Its 10' buffer shall be considered Native Growth Area per ECDC Section 20.15B. This area 0 will remain as an undeveloped area except for an access easement to Lot 4. &Ale. (Z 0 sa 6. Conditions of approval must be met and can be found in the final approval for the short subdivIsagCEIVED NO signed thil-9 Instrument and acknow[edged It to be (his/her) free and voluntary act f located in File S-2GOO-82. 'gr,,,PA u as and purposes mentioned In the instrument. 'Zo J. NOV 2 52003 7. At the preconstructlon conference, the contractor & developer shall work with the planning and 8 engineering departments to ensure this requirement is met: PERMIT COUNTER C,i M Trees that are not hazards as determined by the Planning Department or required to be removed as part Signature of of the required plot Improvements shall be protected with fences or bales of hay around their drip line. Notary Public' AOL4.4� The earch around these tress shall not be compacted by storing equipment or materials within the'drip line C) Vn A4alw of the tress. The Planning Division must approve these protection measures prior to grading. M Dated - J� - IAN My *Ppaintmifff ek, teos 17 MAN NONUNION III Page 1 of 2 RECORDER'S CERTIFIQATE ................... SURVEY FOR: T, As, .7 T, _. T-7.1 it 111.7 7 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 8. JBII-A filed for record this Jin d�y of %,14141 20AA. atFi-AM. �44& M.F Consulting Engineers THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNOER John B. Friel, PE PLS in book ... =... of ........ at paos .. . .... the request of MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT'S OF THE SURVEY'RECORDING ACT AT TflE REQUEST OF Pqpo Sonoma Development J11-n I b IN OF __V_0L. PO BOX 27 0 A 10303 NE 190th St 74 EVERETT, WA 98206 z . ....... (425) 771-3892 Bothell, WA 98011 1JOQ #: E02_010S 0 T.. fzr W. U. 0. r ...... Mgr. Supt. of Records ...... CERTIFICATE NO. 10749 EXPIRES 5/30/03 ..... ..... DRAWN: DATE: SCALE: 001111 islowimllim, I 111111,11AIN plal 1111111 !1!, 11111110111. 1i HMM Dec. 6, 2002 1 20' 1,8,01111 go 0,111MIJIMI., 1 11,11 IN M. :nc) >r-0C C:) :9 r- rn Aft 0" 'HIP 27 N,ORTH E,,3 EAST, F THE SE 114 OF THE SW 1/4, SECTION 3*1 F%OWNU .# RANG 0"-..82 Mon not Found CITY Of EDMOND-6 S-P S-400 ,'�Found Tack in Lead R 40' Al �q 6a 9 2. 301 1 30' P75, 4 3 0' 3.0' FOUND PK NAI:L)X L FOUND TK IN LEAD, 0.2' S RECORDER'S CERTI;FICATE filed for record this day of . ".'O.o.5. at F-Am. in book ..... ..... of at page ........... at the request of 1: 1 TM 64 I - Mar. Sju-.P��-e �rdla- ...... 0. w- 0 Found Rabar & Cap LS 13374, 0.1:� S & 24.66' W of Sct Corner SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUiREMENTS OF THE SU DiNG ACT AT THE REQUEST OF AND P220 OF Wo CERTIFICATE NO. 10749 0� WAS&I."k F"1617F t /�.- r `� G/ST �1% L " L 0�� C - I- UPIRES -07 I SURVEY FOR: Sonoma Development 10303 NE 190th St Bothell, WA 98011 �01 Imp- - MERIDIAN - PLAT 0 LOT CORNER SET (REBAR W/ CAP) 11 FOUND 2"x2" STAKE & TACK X FOUND PK NAIL 0 FOUND REBAR & CAP, LS 13374 El SET 2"x2" STAKE Found 2"x2" Hub & Tack I Page 2 of 2 J;B,MF Consulting Enoinee-re John B. Friel, PE PILS PO BOX 27 EVERETT, WA 98206 JOB #: E02-010S (425) '771-3892 DRAWN: DATE: SCALE: lot HMM I Dec. 6, 2002 = 20'