Loading...
24228 76TH AVE W.PDF6471 24228 76TH AVE W IA) -TC) PEV-Vill-r Zf)0,3-0?-L,5 �tvl �,l uy, RECEIVED APR 16 2003 PERMIT COUNTER C-0 to VA V Lr C/o G.d c 1 14.,, APPROVED AS NOTED 1% & BY ENGINEERING Date: 41141o.3 WATER & SEWER INSPECTIONS REQD 5FATTL-F ZN?rl5lr CA09C CA4 -p no EXT. 1= 7 2 YF- fpA4z)t4v5 W,6, 1326 V Pfv's c'411710 3 �ZT E REBBJED K 16115� RES PERMIT EXPI USE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER 200 0 S 7 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB RESW _r1_ SUITE/APT OrNEFI NAME/NAME OLSU&YqESS ADD PLAT hA%E' ,#UBDIVISION NO. LOT 0. LID NO. -s± �ILING AQID�KRESS IVIA :�)A Ll Lu z TESCP App—ed 0 BI: PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RWP RR tied Ar3 0 Pe ?) 10 li� (.0 W; ..."U"aa =IR,�Wa - CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PAPOSED Impaction ad Sidewalk F d 0 REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Undergmund 12� r) .. � . . ----7— Wiring required 0 NA ... METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES Er NO Iff 3 y cc W LU A151DRESS 71Y17", REMARKS z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLIDRAINAGE z qa Lu T C. Ahzro4 7D PA F_ It- #X -S 1ALL-S eI,6 V /01 cel S 5 -r Ad A 1 NAM�. -ky 19F 6! ENGINE ING R �V E7WD/DATE AMD— Q .7 Q1.11 Y PQ E E j,5DAT7 Uj CITY ZIIP JE�� z P40ON LL A R 1 .1 SHORELINE OR ADB# IN�P� BO D C� __'j­­CHECKED BY DO N 1POSNED STAXEL N MBER EXPIRAfION'DATE-' RE, YES [3 NO SEPA.REVIEW. SIGN AREA HEIGHT PROPERTY TAX A LINT PARCEL NO. CqM I PLETE I EXEMPf ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED &V qal -D00- to — 110 V EVP 'PLUMBING MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) XPROP6SED SETBACKS (FT.) NEW RESIDEN . TIAL ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT . SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR ADDITION OMMERCIAL OMPLIANCE OR z WC :eCCHANGE OF USE f4ti. _., I I... z PARKING LOT AREA EVIEWE6B � "I REMODEL C] APARTMENT SIGN REO'D I PROVIDED DT i Id 70 E:] FENCE &1q REPAIR C] GRADING CYDS FT) ARKS DEMOLISH F] TANK C] OTHER FkV A19A_ o GARAGE 0 RETAINING WALL z CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL . P: (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHE�6"b BY P C NSTRUCTION OCCUPWAT r C/71 GROUP/t U U) W.., -7 2iL w NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL 0 AR ALINSPE R OCCUPANT 110 OF DWELLING EAS jj� SPECI o STORIES UNITS NUMBER REQUIRE LOAD All I ORK 0 0 REMARKS PROGRESS INSPE( !R UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION R.E0'D CL nA A C T e4t-A (I J e— gfj.c: 1, CA CA Al f_ CA Ack- `49 A 2 hae—S, . MWLI VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE qn HEATSOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOP�*�. F BUILD ING 0 qM ,PLAN CHECK Nn VESTED DATE PLUMB ING kY�&n t7— MECHANICAL THIIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL SEPARATE PERMISSION. 2 STATE SURCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT LIMIT: I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAY r"rric rl ITI&Aml /0/0.77 SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION . S ENG. REVIEW FEES ENG. INSPECTION FEE 'APPLICANT. ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS uj _j IN INTEREST, AGREES TO NDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, % OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE cc ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHAL . L NOT BE PLAN 'CHECK DEPOSIT REIEVI _L 10 DEEMED To MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE _j 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE RECEIPT I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION a GIVEN IS CORRECT,AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF )N APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- This application is not a permi I I until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFIC MSIG�E DATE Sliki6E (OWNER DATE IGNJID (425). 1 L AIt 771-0220 _RELEISED BY DATE A77ENTION EXT 333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL /V.ts A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- 771-0221 ORIGINAL -FILE - YELLOW- INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 ATE RECEIVED 00 3 1pi PERMITEXPIRESL% CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION U S . E PERMIT 0;210 ZONE NUMBER JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAM E/SUBDIVISION NO. L . OT NO. L�D NO. L D FEE $ MAILING ADDRESS 70-l' 7/1' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING — PROPOSED REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT TES CP Appmed 0 RW Permit Required 0 Street Use Permit Req'd C) Inspection Required 0 Sidewalk Required 0 Underground Wiring required 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE C-fs-x— 4s-�& NAME /'Z L? 4) LOP 0 SO/L) METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 13 NO C) Lu ADDRESS 1,00/ UA�_ REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE z z CITY ZIP TELEPHONE 12? owe. NAME tF r y ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE ADDRESS 22 426)d R WE BY DATE 113 1&0 ui W LL CITY ZIP " 7 111trjr-_ 7 r-l;e TELEPHONE D? �_ - �L7 IANCE OR C Vf SHORELINE OR ADB# 1 INSPECTION REO'D 0 YES n NO IPBOND OSTED z z CL n STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CH�CKED BY SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP I SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED I HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED I PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. \ C\ \ \ �D I 0:�NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH AUDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR CHANGE OF USE REMODEL APARTMENT SIGN REPAIR E] GRADING C Ei FENCE X YDS FT) OT ER DEMOLISH TANK z K. MC-1 Vy GARAGE ROETAINING WALL CARPORT R CKERY RENEWAL LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT UIR SIDE REAR PARKING ED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE REMARKS (TYPE OF USE. BUSAESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKEDBY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIOUHZfODE M( OCCUPANT* GROUP y V­1 z a _j :3 NUMBER OF STOFIIE�'S',, NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS CRITICAL AREAS NUMBER SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAREA REQUIRED [— YES OCCUPA�& LO, QESCA& WORK 1-0 BE DONE At ::�4 REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/1FINAL INSPECTION REO'D _,NC-i7 F C,4 77 c2k�) rl /Z 6 r-X- 777 1-77-71V6, c 12c 0/ rr VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT �DURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING V5 PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES; ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. W PERMIT APPLICATION: 181 0 DAYSk STATE SUliCHARGE 13. PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION "APPLICANT. ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, I SSIGNS AND SUCCESORS IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIF _Y� DEFEND AND HOL HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM cc ANYAND INSPECTION FEE 4 ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY x FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE 0 PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIPT DE _j EMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 01 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.- x TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I RECEIPT a I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION — - GIVEN IS CORRECT. AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. W KM IS COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. 0 Ar DATE SIGNED (425) OFFICIALS SIGNATURE DATE Aw 3-13-001 771-0220 -RELEAgEDVY DATE A-rTENTICf4 EXT 333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX ORIGINAL - FILE - Y�LLOW - INSPECTOR PINK - OWNER - GOLD ASSESSOR 5/98 , , ­7 A 110 - t 0 I& z 0 PLANNING DATA New Commercial Proiects ;;;� \\AJDRESS:9,,­V01 -VN V. ZONING: SITE USE(S) PROPOSED:Aa" ALLOWED?: Wmtk�l LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINCTIO;j ISSUtD (Y/ CUP File:.Uk—M- To Allow What Uses?: KA 1AX- A ADB FILE #:.N[A PARKING: Use: N No. S es Required: X �(floor ar , # employee s-, etc.) '9� mployq Use: X Use: X Use: X Total SETBACKS: o. Spaces Required: oor area, # employees, etc.) = No. Spaces Required: (floor area, # employees, etc.) = No. Spaces Required: (floor area, # employees, etc.) = Actual Provided: Required Setbacks: Front: ide: R* t Side: Rear: e Actual Setbacks: ft S ft id R ht S r to ffio-�-- r t Front: Sid --Right Side: Rear: Street map checkedd for itional setbacg required? _(Yes/No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Maximum Allowed: Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: -Actual Height: Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: Elevator Penthouse > 3 t over height limit? If so,VAR# LANDSCAPING: Matches ADB app Bid Provided? nd Amount (100% bid): DATE: -PLAN CHK#: (�7a7754 NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT:SQA* IFO" Continued ... 1Ahbrary\^P1andatNewComm.doc 46 ADB FILE #- OR DATE WAIVED: PLANS MATCH-OPROVED PLAN: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #: SEPA DETERMINATION: SHORELINE REQUIRED?: LOT AGGREGATION RE(5/UIRED?: REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE.?'NQ) OTHER: Plan Review By: 1A1ibrary\AP1andatNewComm.doc 0 f BUILDING DIVISIONW Applicant Fill ins PERMIT APPLICATION at:VT "AMIF (OR NAME OF 13U INESS) Ar si %I #n 11C 71K III F40kILING ADDRIM55 z L 0 CITY EPHONE NUM13ER TL W 1'.. M ICITY EP HONE NUMBER -C f1rE L NAME M 0 ADDRESS I- V M CITY TELEPHO14E NUMBER I.- z 0 U STATE LICENSE NUM13ER CITY LICENSE NUMBER Legal Description of Property (Show 6elow or.Attach Four Copies) z I- U W USE ZO 4FIAIT ER LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBDIVISION I SHORT SU13 WO. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PROPOSED DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQ'D 1:3 NO. ELEVATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS & FOOTINGS REQ'D 4- SEE ENGINEER ING MEMO DATED CHECKED B Y METER SIZE 113UILDING SUFfPLY SIZE SIGN AREA JCOMENV. REVIEW ALLOWED PROPOSED PLETEI EXEMPT REMARKS VARIANCE OR CU IPLANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS COVERAGE ILOT El RESIDE GAS FRONT SIDE REAR NEW NTIAL LINE FIRE Z014E TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION H E 1777 NON-RESIDENTIAL SIGN I ICODE ADD DEMOLISH RETAINING SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPAI ALTER ,I EXCAVATE 10 OR FILL WALL FENCE I- X — FT) REQUIRED D YES 0 No GROUP I LOAD PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SIT E IS LOCATED IN THE CITY REPAIR PR E-MOV a EIINSP swim POOL OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. REMARKS z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO OF DOME U 0 PLAN CHECK FEE IVALUATION ' PLOT PLAN BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL FENCE SIGN 14 "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and 01 41 .j successors in interest, agrees to indemnify,,defend and hold harmless I the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and RETAINING WALL ir agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, < I arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issu- MSWIMMING POOL FEE 0 3: U 5 M (L a: IW 3: I- z III :E M W a Z W 0 j =W W z 3 0 _1U o ance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce J A I any reqtiirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way -the DATE': R11i !d j�r.p, C(MllllulliLy Develo-prieriL Enoineering Division Puklli.c I�Iorks DeparLnienr- SUBJECT: �2 i%fLer revie,.,� oir ClIc sllhjc�cL buildin� 11 C. f o I I o C 0 11"m 0 11 'U'3 pel.MiL applicaLion %--�e have A I &I A C2 CO U q 6F h A IA2 zz os 9�� I " j, sq�� % - ol \2 IN, N Q. Whi Ze jI -a. . 4 DESCplp7-10, Tllc� Lake �P�75hl 911 ilo eo e -era,, w IVO. Ae Ole 1�ie a. T Ale e.93, VS1 2i^,i '?e eCS/1521-1 A1,71, C 140 9 9. e 0 CC) CY) CID ::D FV FL-O\A T-il-s- W- cq 18 12 -C,, 17 -,z.4 Z- 6� '6 -Z(4 E3 10 19 o(D 09 Z H D 15 14 4 9 13 _ZJ7 r Zq 6-1 7 I Z Ll LF 4 -7 �c Z.. 0,5 '107 -7 -7 i 7/1Z 4-1 All C— "(4311 CD CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION USE ZONE S mul &E JOB -AP UiTE AP ADDRESS ') SUITE " //-/ A OWNER NAME N ME OF BUSINESS kr[Kc baflly,, OR f, J'etma tlihadpff AIIAP;ic �7,t 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO L-D 1 NO MAILING ADDRESS Ants- I(P.." +10 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PEA OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP :W :X STING — REQUIRED DEDICAT90N IiIf88I -oP.!IEO nopechom APPIMed 0 Permit Required 0 Use Permit Read 0 Required D A--- alk Required 111 I 111.11"111 itLt;FHUNt UMBER - 25g2 NAME METER SIZE 0. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 0 NO 0 AD REMARKS 6 W z ZIP ITELEPHONE NUMBER -f7 GINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEVIEDBY JRESs C it "PD12� I I W TE _jj� N SEP FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY u. 6E LICENSE NUMBER A EXPI 01 _ 2oo/* A-i-rm �)Q 1go-i SIGN AAEA ALLOWED PROPOSED. I SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE JEXEMPT EXP ADS NO. Legal Description oWroperty - include all easements SHORELINE I VARIANCE OR CU nR VIEW BY I r E ri SETBACKS — FEET FRONT SIDE_ FEAR H EIGHT LOT c6VERAGE z =.nt Parcel No. REMARKS ElNEW D RESIDENTIAL El PLUMBING ADDITION COMMERCIAL 1:1 MECHANICAL REMODEL APT. BLDG. El SIGN GRADING CYGS� FENCE REPAIR x —7 WOODSiOVE SWIM POOL Mo.OLISH - INSERT- HO'T TUa/SPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL el Ali CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION r PECIAL INSPECTOR AHLIA UIRED I 13 YES ANT GR U OCCUPANT LOAD ARKS OGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 (TYPCOF USF. @USINEWR ACTIVITY) EXPLA11,14N CRITICAL OF DW STORIE" LIN S DESCRIBE W0jIK TO BE DONE FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED /7//" PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING BUILDING /I/t/ , PLUMBING Plan Check No. 4- MECHANICAL p2o This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewpiks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant. on behalf of his or her spouse. heirs, assigns and ENO. INSPECTION FEE successors in interest, agrees to indemnity. defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, 2 employees. and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 5 0 1 0 modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the I n 1 0 rmat I Or Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL a u to rZ a :thorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT State law. tuate laws regulating construction; and In doing the work author' Z. AUTHORIZE S This application is not a permit until a ' a d ther 'by. no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Lhd . Cod 0 of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compense. WORK :NOTED Deputy: and fees are paid. and receipt is I, tion insurance and RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. G ATuRE OWNY,"ENT) DATE SIGNED ; DEPARTMENT CITY OF E MODS D OF ATTENTION FSTA CALL FOR INSF DATE IT S UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCbVA BUILDING OR CTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-0220 ORIGINAL — F.Ie YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. USC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor INA? "'PUBLIC WORKS VE 'ARMI� CKL��_ BUILDING PERNIT ? 40 A*76-tk '/—/0-7e _!F, (date) _Moon rco� (address) 0 Street %XV6*71�4ay Exist REQD K)(r) Kya Z Access Easements Existing. &) (r) JEQD . , p4 Utility Easernent Existing______tjCLLj�.._REQ)`D Klik Lot Per SubdivisioiG-322���Plat Assessor Site Plan Checked for Accuracy. 4 Z- (e 1183 Underground 14iring Reqd. H 0 Check Accura of Legal Description:. CY (t :2; Review b VD Date Existing Water Main Size— 1E3." PZ Water Main Required. tJn Service Line Required ze,�j Hydrant Size Existing, Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code �4ASs Size Detector Check Meter Reqd. '5� Cross Connection Inspection Fire Department Comnents Water Meter Charge Reqd. :!it 0 0 0, 0 00 Review by. Date Septic Tank Design Approved Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd.— Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Availability 'T,cz—s, Proj - 4,�p /,C>S7 brm"ing No. File No. 1,14-70 Side Sewer Availability _jt�z Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee Reqd. :3: W., Review by --- Date 4/-//-797 Open Ditch Existing_A/.�_ -Re�. Culvert Reqd. /t/' —Size P4 Catch Basin Reqd.ny e on Site Plan. 0 -Indicate Shoulder drainage maintain collection an swale open runoff I yz� J-��nhole reqd. Indicate an Site Plan Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field.Checked Review by Up �g?7. Date . 7 jr -Z Lkyri Revised: lvlO-1977 AlIkk .-j - — amusk, ) BUILDING DEPARTMW Applicant RIO .UT TWOMMR PERMIT APPLICATION Inside Heavy Lines JOB ADDRESS NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) SUBDIVISION NO. PLAT NAME ASSTSOR MAP NO. SE14 %C-3 I w 'WAILING ADDRESS z 0 PPUBLIC 70 RIGHT OF WAY PER ORDINANCE NO. C9rT Y ELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY NAME u W,4 &-64 AE A DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY ADDRESS STREET/UTILITY WORK REQUIRED EYES NO % m 6o 4 PERMIT FOR WORK IN PUBLIC R/W 1N YES El NO 0 3: CITY TELEPHONE.NUMBER 1 0: UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED EYES NO U 1417-0 0, CONNECTION T 0 SANITARY SEWER 12YES El NO SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQUIRED Y ES &NO m IL WAFVrE SEPTIC TANK PERMIT NO. AIJDRESS 13 V10 let 5 zt/ SEE MEMO DATED e_0 1-11-70 0 ul J� M I'_ CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER REMARKS Z 0 7 7�� 73 NA- U STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER CHEtKED I-Tky- 2145 — 0. YfA Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copies) METEW SIVE I BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE -e, It W REMARKS z SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. U ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT .J REMARKS < 0 W VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS FRONT SIDE REAR ILOT COVERAGE GAS NEW RESIDENTIAL OLINE FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT NON-RESIDENTJIAL I`Z�l SIGN Ind :D-- 11175 ADD DEMOLISH RETAINING 1:1 WAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAREA QUIRED V1 8 0, JOCCUPANCY OCCUPANT GROUP LOA EXCAVATE ALTER FENIL YES N 1:1 0 9 16" 1 Z3 _ 2u j OR FILL x FT) El - PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE 17 REPAIR PRE -MOVE Sw I M INSP. POOL IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF REMARKS t7 4 gf 1,ep- /NAT DWELLING UNITS ALIVA'-ef— z W — U RE OF WORK Yb BE DONE CL W PLAN CHECK FEE VALUATION FEE PROPOSED USE 2 z - PLOT PLAN (INDICATE BUILDING SETBACKS, ABUTTING STREE S) T BUILDING W I X 0 U VI J W PLUMBING W > MECHANICAL pep", 0 III a FENCE z SIGN RETAINING WALL 0 U SWIMMING POOL C', o Water Eagle Associa MD RICHARD M. TRAINER E*EERS INC. IE 824 San Antonio Road PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94303 (415) 494-3565 TO City of Edmonds Public woms uept. Public Works Dept. -Eng. Division 200 Dayton St. Edmonds, WA 98020 A T.E M March 8, 1978 I JOB N 0 17758 FO ATTENTION ... 6 Dick Allen RE: GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU �] Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: 0 Shop drawings [N Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples El Specifications E3 Copy of letter El Change order El COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 Site Plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 0 For approval Xj For your use 0 As requested 0 For review and comment 0 FOR BIDS DUE • Approved as submitted • Approved as noted 0 Returned for corrections 1-1 19 • Resubmit -copies for approval • Submit -copies for distribution • Return -corrected prints El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Please mark up where we may pick up the utility, COPY TO SIGNED: (&V- ) 'A FORM 240-2 - Available from To.nsend, Mass. 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify umm�y.' W'!,T APPLICATION h City of Edmonds for e SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT NO . .............................. 40 NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO . .. ............... OWNER ------ ...... E CONTRACTORNN 111 EHY.— PERMIT NO. 7 JOB ADDRESS .... ......... LEGAL DESCR IPTION: LOT NO - ---------- ........................... BLOCK NO - - ----------------------------- ...... ....................... ......................................... .................................................... ....... : ............................ I ------- ................ NAMEOF ADDITION ................................... ................................................................................... Approved: /2� ......................... ............. DATE K� N' V mc.,_ � wl� _WWATEWSEWER, DEPART NT . ..... .. 6.141 PERMIT C Ili 7.75-25 25: forotside, s , ewer :inspections,, IIEFORE: covering,,ariy rtion %the, con . str . uction.,N, po Inspection will be provided� within 24 hours: after requst. NO :Sat :S11m*. -.or -holiday lnspectlonsj� 01K, ONSTRUCTION.' �kss ............ ...... ......... A7.1 .. ..................................... ............. ................ ...................................... ..................... ............. ................. .......... .... . ............. .......................... ........ ..................................... ............. .................. ........................... ........... . .......................... 4 W.—ER, M. M/OWBUHL DER ......... - .... ..... ....... ................ ............ .................. ........................... OM, �e T. I ORISNYAW&Air-AA)DRESS ........... ......... ...................... ........... .... ............................ Z: ...... ...... ................... .............. se ...... .......................................... jr,andV6ic'o�nectlbn.!df4 side wer to, the, city, sanK�i. sewer� Y, 'Pat &ZA4ii acc6idkh6e�,With'&1t* t9f 'Edmondis, ordtinancest- �s ,�Ts I _TSrCkU,,EU!TO T-IiF.FOLLOWING.: ATTENT ONP may, 4obtain, a permR.,, M construct Sewer' Inside, Woper-Cy -,line.' A, licensed, Side Sewer true i;i�&E, No. A�LT' i;he,pro'p�rity,* e. dmploye`&.,toic6ns t side. sewer 4nlstreet. area; D6 not,,cover any..portion­of sewer,before-,it., has beeni:inspected. ';2�.-L-AN115work,'.�erformed',In,�city rl - ght-of -way requires an. IrIvasion of.-I�Jght-of-Way Permit o . btadiva.151a from. 1he' City, En glneWs �office. ftill',Information �regarding,,Ordlnance 1.11.1e.'030"and '11:egulati6ns gov6rnlng�slde. �ewera�whem you,!git perrnit�. NOTE' No., 7,4�, Top� ofVsid (t� sewer 'musV have at least 30, inches - coverage af property. line andi 12 Inches. inside !property, line 'minimum gra:de, of .2 -W. '-No-,bends. Inbjiade-. 7,­ '�,shaxi5irnthanNpwill Ve,.permitted. renches�,IhCistr�etoi�ust�be water �settled,and surfacejof -street restored, to orl. ginal, condltl�n. Contract6m sha.11 �b6 responsible for. f allure-duw',tol improper. !'�worli'whl h-'.may -develop-within; one year of complett on: c ',to-,alter�or400anj i)',other. work' than, -is prov�d ed for lhl.the,,Permi�,.,or.'�t6'��db,an'y wo_rk4rvthe*m&in,sewer-or, Its,.appurtenanc6s, except,. to in -'s�rti,thi,,pipe into,the,wye. ..... ... By ..'�,Date.. By. IS"TROVEW, Date; .......................... ........... ....... ....... �F� . . . . Y� Ad '0 ...... . ............ A. ........ ........... ............. .................. ..................................... ............. .......... ........................... . ........ 1.,i:�.�._� .. ........................ ......... I ................... ........... . ......... ........ ............ . . ......................................... ....... ............................ 7 ...... ............................. ........ .......... .......................................... MU SP Be. Signed' By 'ON�ner of 'Firm.Pe -xning.'.d�h t IkUORL To Re4uest FbL_Inspectim s ruction -that,the,side, sewer installation -constructed under thi ...... 'he ...... ............... L ...... ....... ...... reby certify W '��((5�W;�enofi,C6ntracxg Firm, Perf ormIng, Construction.).' i't J, .4 wd � s!"Un- S tall'6 drilv','acc. 6rdan ce,,M th, al t. gjoverni - ng ordinances of 'thei�C ily. of. Edmondii..v V ... Dated"this ............................. "Y of ............................................................. ........... m yowdik for: Water'' N 0, ..,-Gas -jg,, Telephon&,�3;. Po�xver- E)',. Sewer E]P' Other. '10 V .,V It C4P SAV. A01 14111 07e 1?0,,th 0,,`7 oct 16,- Z. 7ra oke Rc,41ee., I C-CO,-O'eY Yo/ 50, Z7D,7 Y, A�75hlyi:�1017; 0 /he Clll� 0 1,* COP ile wit . �ed leeo, I "OoSes 9 I�W ZXlf�-PTlhe 5o&,,�- 1.50 p No. wes /25 XL eosl /jo I-EPT / ,-eof,- � I V 06'he 7 5 0/,m,7/ eosemel7l S�L71e -6- z 1VD wllh al�� Sel, So e., osq Ser /ac,� hol� FL 7 I N#me:-'ofPr.qposed! Project: "'pus, Owner/Applicant Applicant Contact. Person: ob Name -Name. Avv- tY zip Telephone:.. Traffic Engineer who. prepared theTraffic linpact Analysis (if applicalbl'61- PKoject Traffic Levels-. Less: 'iffi�n .' 2 �6eA�.fi- tri enerate'd I and,T. ofil"" itch, eciclis7tY. 5 our. ps g., .,y;(,w6&hee 11, Moie than 25 peak-ho4jfipsgenerated All sectibns CI) q x m m m 0 d. Date construction willbegin an4be e. f Defineproposed sight:di.stance..at site egess locations: 2. TRW.GENERATION Sourcephall be the Eighth Edition: ofthe Institute. 6fTransportation Engineers, (ITE) Tri Generation P manual.�. Fo'r,indepcindenf f�e.-Cal6iilaiion�s,.t�e-cuimiiteditibri 6fthd ITE manual maybe used; ADT A�eragp Wily tiraffiC6. PM Peakrhour trips (AM, noon or school Deak may: also apply as: directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing, $ite. Trip Generation Table: b. ropqsed;p.�rqject Trip,Generation -Table:..,,., C. Net Ne-Ar Project Trip I.Genetation table: 7. MITIGATION RKOMMENDAMONS�.%. State. recqmmeqded.,measure&..an& fees r6o d -affic impacts. Traffic -.yirq.i:lp.nutigate.project specific, b impact fee. sliift...bi�qalculated from the Edmondload.,Impact Fee Rate Stu� a e, 4 (attach and a si d enfifie &in.::ECl) 18..82.120, excev se prqvi �y :i,a&o drwi fbi independent f66 calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. 11 CHANGEJNUSE.� 'Fee- or ppbr use shall be based'on fee: established at the iiniethe p4gr use. a If the was permitted. preyio . us. use was p . ;rmit(e'd-:pri'qr o�. o, op on o t ith ad'' ti f0idifianct 35*10 ective.date' 09/12 4 thil.064'ECDC 1&82jlojmvact.f4 S C.e: e.us,ed.,, New. Use Fee. Prior Use Fee. M/P�WDXVELOPMENT, El OTHER 15cattle F)aptistCkurck Valet FarLing rropo5al C�A 00 '1$d ReCe,VE:D 15 4,999 s DEVELOPM�N SERVICE _.CITY OFUMOND!S- Seattle E)apti,5t Ckurck would liLe to propo.5e valet parLing on tke 5outk 5ide of tke 6uilding located at 2-+2-2-3-76tk Avenue W in Dmond-5- Tkere are 51 exi,5ting availa6le parLing 5pace,5 on tke soutk 5ide of tke 6uilding and 2� on tke ea5t 5ide. We would kave room for 15 additional car5 (5 rows of 3 car5 eack) 5ituated in 6etwcen tke alreacl�) 5triped area5 on tke soutk side of tke 6uilding. Tke.5e 15 car5 will 6e de,5ignated familie.5 (5unda� 5ckool teacker,5, deacon5, and ckurck 5taffl and would Lnow to leave immediatel.9 at tke conclu.5ion of ckurck 5ervice5. Tki-5 would accommodate 75 . total vekicle,5, leaving ample room for emergencq vekicle,5 on tke nortk and ea5t,5icle,5 of tke 6uilding. 0 RECEIVED OCT 15 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS October 12, 1999 Dear City of Edmonds, My name is Darryl Ryales and I have been in a wheelchair for approximately six years. I was taken through the newly acquired property of Seattle Baptist Church located at 24228-76 th Avenue W and found the building plans to be very handicapped friendly. My suggestion would be that there be no entrance doors to the bathrooms because there is a privacy wall and it would be easier to get in with a wheelchair. I would also recommend that the handicapped stall be at least 48 inches wide with double bolting support bars and that a taller handicapped commode be installed. Thank you for your consideration of the handicapped of our area. Si cerely Darryl Ryales DR/ljo 6A jfl, jz 0, IVY 4r or All A4- 4,!!� A6 P, POPS A& 14% it 4, IF 4pp two, lk 4k, -,j, VIA lip- ........... .......... k (54 nn -A �k it �V low gizzy -tab, 46 JP ov, J, /ov, -w 4", mg -:4 IL PAP INV 7:9k \4P ea PAy 14 TO .4 77 4,, I s. Wr _4M A0% 12 44, 3 J; xx AN rn JAN 2 12000 CTR. OF Seattle Baptist "E" "ON" ',ER\of 1,,c,)Ess e,,� David YL Cox, Pastor P.O. Box 12086 - Mill Creek, WA 98082 (206) 774-1240 4­ January 21, 2000 Ms. Ahn Bullis Plans Examiner — "City of'Edmonds Community Services Department — Building Division 121-5 1h Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Bullis, This letter is being written and submitted to you in response to Plan Check #99-376 and item number one of the "Plan Review Comments" dated January 11, 2000. Hopefully, the following explanation and details 'about a typical Sunday and mid -week service at Seattle Baptist Church will answer your questions. In addition, I started Seattle Baptist Church in May of 1990. Sunday Services: Sunday School — 225 total people Sunday School is for all ages and starts at 10:00 a.m. and concludes at 10:45 a.m. We average 100 adults and 125 children. That includes the entire adult classes, children's classes, nurseries, teachers, and nursery workers. We would anticipate using a wide variety of areas of the church and be quite spread out. during the Sunday School hour. Worship Service — 260 total people Our main Worship Service starts at 11:00 a.m. and concludes shortly after noon on most Sundays. We average, 195 adults and teens in the main auditorium. Children's Church, the nursery, and the workers in these areas average 65 individuals. Therefore, on a normal Sunday, we anticipate around 200 in the main auditorium, 30 in the children's church area, and the balance in the nursery area. "The Church that helps you bear your burdens" 0 Sunday Night Service — 180 total people , Sunday night service starts at 7:00'p.M. with the service ending shortly after 8:00 p.m. We average 155 people in the main auditorium and 25 in the nursery. Mid -Week Wednesday Service: Mid -week Wednesday Service — 150 total people Mid -week service starts at 7:30 p.m. and concludes at 8:30 p.m. . We average 130 adults in the main auditorium and 30, in the nursery. We anticipate growthin.our church and if the need arises, our, plan is to add a 9:00 a.m. Worship Service to alleviate any parking issues. We also feel it is important to provide a safe and comfortable environment for our church services. Therefore, we are no longer interested in pursuing any stacked. valet parking. Ltrust this explanation will help you to understand our church a little better, but please feel.free to call me direct if I have not,adequately answered your questions or concerns.. Sincerely, David R., Cox Pastor DRC/Ijo a WAi Date: March 18, 1999 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer M411e Subject: CU Application for Seattle Baptist Church at 24228 - Ih Ave. W. (CU-99-45) The Engineering Division reviewed the subject plan. The traffic engineer requested that the applicant provide the following items: • A copy of the agreement regarding sharing parking with your neighbor. • Submit parking configuration plan. 9 Show driveway width, cross section and slope. Traffic report is required. Traffic mitigation is $238 per new PM peak trip generated by the proposed project. The applicant must comply with the conditions of any future applications. The Engineering Division has no other comments on the subject application. The application is incomplete until the requested information is provided and reviewed. City of Edmonds Development Services Department Date: To: MEMORANDUM March 16, 1999 Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer From: Jarnal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer � /VN Subject: Conditional Use permit for Seattle Baptist Church at 24228 — 76h Ave W (ADB - ) (CU 99-45) The following traffic issues are required: 1. Submit a copy of the agreement regarding sharing parking with your neighbor; see the Conditional Use Permit Application you had submitted. In addition, please calculate number of parking stalls required. 2. Submit parking configuration plan 3. Show Driveway width, cross section, and slope. 4. Traffic report is required. Traffic mitigation is $238 per new PM Peak trip generated by the proposed project. Note: I spoke with Jeff Wilson regarding SEPA. Jeff mentioned SEPA is required, so we can charge the traffic impact fee through SEPA. Thanks. CIty of Edmonds ................... 5552im \\crry2\SYS\ENGR\JAMAL\Go�dy-Di;L\CU99-45.DOC Community Services Department Engineering Division MEMORANDUM Date: March 8, 1999 To: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer Subject: CU Application for Seattle Baptist Church at 24228 — 76hAve. W. (CU-99-45) Engineering received the attached CU application today. Please review the attached- informatio�'�� your comments to me for inclusion into a memo to the Planning Division by 99 hank you for providing a rapid review and response. Mf —19� qg�_Vk YCI& City of Edmonds Development Services Department city f edmonds land use application ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD El COMP PLAN AMENDMENT U CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT El HOME OCCUPATION C3 FORMAL SUBDIVISION 0 SHORT SUBDIVISION C3 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT C3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Q OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT/ . STREET VACATION C3 REZONE 0 SHORELINE PERMIT 0 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION 0 OTHER GVECEIVED MAR 0 5 1999 FILE # aLl(Aq-� 5 _ ZONE_,F/I/ DATE REC-D BY Z-7-7' yA 7 ,4� FEE 7 RECEIPT#— Iq DATE HE . C3 STAFF C1 PB Q ADB Q CC ACTION TAKEN: C3 APPROVED 11 DENIED El APPEALED APPEAL# Applicant SeaWf- CWAV-C Phone iq-��S) -7-7 L4 ag 0 Address 601-k �ac)9(0 M��l C.Icf-e-k— WA Tgo,� Property Addres's or Location \i Property Owner Address ao�,S- Phon( -A v 1�- al 0 , -S Agent Address Phone a-C i- e t- -7 9 - Tax Acc # LA (� � k D00 o 1 --0 1a) � � --Sec..-.3.k Twp.-a1l`\A Rng. 04E Legal Description -'RLY,, ()()n t\j M-A ET OP T R () C- Y\ C- N � D Y-1 (Y CA L E- 4 OF I T �A C) �-- C-o N \t� -70 C TT D F Es� M I-) tv D S V-0 91 R IN M- (I C k� f� I F-- Details of Project or Proposed Use cc�s suy\&k-1, and, The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT S41 Proposal By: Seattle Baptis;t Church. RE: Building and Site located at 24228-76t' Arvenue W Edmonds, WA 98026 Legal Description: BLK OOCD D-I 3 N 384FT OF TR 10 EXC N 1 OFT & EXC E 40FT THOF CONVYD TO CITY OF EDMONDS FOR RD BY QCD RE Tax I D: 4911 000 01 0 13 11 The above named hereby proposes to occupy existing building located at above stated addr-ess. Exterior work would consist of minimal cosmetic work (i.e. signage, painting, etc.). All other work would be interior. We do not foresee any interruption or excessive noi se other than the striping project. Interior work wou.Id consist of a 3,200 square foot auditorium, Sunday School classrooms, fellowshi p* hall and church office �space. 1) We submit that this prolposal is in accordance with and consistent to the "Comprelbensive Plan." 2) We submit that this propo.-sal is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance-- and the purpos es of the zone district in which the use is to be located, and that the proposal use will meet applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance as prov-ided. Development code Chapter 16.45.010 (see provisions under a conditional use permit). 0 1 0 The proposed�.audlito4um will be 3,200 square feet. The parking of 57 on site and 33 on adjoining site (we are pursuing a written agreement with property owner) provides 90 total parking stalls, which is �in accordance to city -code requirements, . and adequate for our needs. - Appointments have been set-up with all other inspection offices (i.e. plumbing, electrical, mechanical, etc.) to ensure compliance with local codes. 3) We hereby submit that this conditional use permit would not be detrimental to the existing comprehensive plan. In that it would provide more consumers ' to the area thus providing more revenue to the city and surrounding businesses. - We hereby submit that the traffic would be less affected during rush hour times. Therefore providing an ideal situation in regard to congestion possibly added by other commercial businesses. We also do hereby submit that the surrounding public health, safety, and welfare would not be compromised in any way by this proposal. 4) The city planner has determined that in the event that Seattle Baptist Ch urch sells this site, new owners would need to re -start the conditional use permit process. PARKING MINI MART RESI DENTIAL PROPERTIES PARKING 76TH. AVENUE WEST A'TTACHMENT A OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATION OF FORMER USTz Design Planting Landscaping k 0 0 4 76th AVY, W 02 tro ox" 1-1 fA � V a 0 V) ry-\ C- r) -� P-) I ST AME NE Win X4 P-liv 115 ,35 U21 'XIT'S INN, MI. MIR"'PTi 161M, V119-filE, ff -9 0 Ub jC0 21 L ;-, * 4:— h le V T. M 369 2 36 --k— A 1 1. LA; F-nera e 0 'A. e Sch. r --FT C'm ff As' 4-111 SITE Lake We e j. .157, C-3 Ballinger Sli N N rA—. 4P" 4.33 J Z: Reference: USGS 7.5'Topographic Map, Edmonds, Washington. 1952, Photorevised 1978 and 1981. k H KLE1 NFELDER PROJECT NO. 60-1777-01 November, 1997 APPROXM�M TE SCALE 0 1000 2DOD I inch 2000 feet Site Location Map PLAT E World Gym Property 24228 76th Avenue E&nonds, Washington ATTACHMENTC r,� 'r L, 4-� Af - C) purpose of Checklist: (4TY OF ED.MONJIS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. T'he purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and,to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if 1( can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructlonsfor Applicants; Th.is -environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic informadon about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to deteirniine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the quesdons briefly, with the most precise information knoAm, or give the best descripbon you can. You must answer each question accur-ately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In mosi cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observauions or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some quesdons ask 2bout govemmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Amswer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist quesdons apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of Limc or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal. or its environmental effects. Tle agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklistfor nonproject proposals. Complete this checklisi for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the chtcklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer,' and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: S.e-(x 0i u 2. Name of applicant: S.,-(,01"�C- ?)Uqv�s�- 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: C-3 �( � 9Q a C) Z (, L-1 I QL q D Page I of 24 —:9 3 :1 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including pha3ing, if applicable): —EI r �s-� 4(f CL LQ4� C'A N--� )2n Ck (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connecied with this proposal? If yes, explain., (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental informa(ion you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. '�S- 0'n e-Y' Y-) C, o n yr\ e n I-ck- YYA e n A a ait ryl be r- 19 q 71 U-) c (STAFF COMMINTS) Do you know whetber applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) Pap 2 of 2 4 6-2 666 1 -9-7- —3 3 -3 10. List any government Approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N1h (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses And size of the project and Ale. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 01U of C-) 005:' Y--) q �n us-e- �E� Q e*lr a C— CA (-'i �'-x rin -S�k r)6 �(o c) V-� o and -C-VA�kr( 'k c e A-� -e e ?6 q '�) u�, kAk' V1 G (STAFY UOMMENT5)_ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, If any, and section, township, stud range, If known. 11 a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the si(c(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by (be agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or det2iled plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. & 13 M -%7v "!2, k1k, (STAFF COM7VTENTS) .-t- -:41 .-j --- : -C - 1 -'K-83:1 �-, t'j - .- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIROWENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Farth A. Genergd description of the site (eirde one): eat rolling, hilly, sicep slopcs, mountainous. other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Wh sit is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, pent, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 1!s C-k, 10 ac �"k n q r,\C( :S C a t2'1 Y')!�4 CQr-vS'1 i n!� (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or his(ory of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N o n e- (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 4 of 14 d e- Describe the purpose, type and 2pproximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of f Ill. (STAFF COMMENTS). f. Could eros;on occur as a resuh of clearing, construction, or use? If to, generally describe. .NIR (STAFF COMMENTS) e- About what per i ccnt of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project congtruction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? (STAFF COMMINTS) h. Proposed measures to redu�e or control erosion, or other impacts to the ear-th, if any: NIA (STAFF COMMINTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. -W 1A (STAFF COMMENTS) P*Qt 5 of 14 b. Arc tberc any off-site9ces of cmi3sions or odor that may effect ytroposal? If go, gencra.11y deuribe- NQ (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: NIA (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER AL Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 'k n n� P)aM-inq+-,. (STAFF COMMENTS)_ (2) Will the projec( require any work over, In, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site thfit would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. (STAFF COMMENTS) Pap 6 of 24 CKKLT DOCU -NOV 93 .33. (4) Will the pro description, I require surface water withdrawals or diversions' Give gcocrul purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lic within a 100-year flondplain? If 30, note location on the site plan. No, (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe (he .type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water.be disch2rged to g-round water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. :Sck n,<'� c- �6 s�'t n q - �Ij (STAFF COMMENTS) - - - . ID... 'I ^r ')A -U 83-� .: r, I-L' Cit., : �- - i K - �(2) Describe wiute ' material that will be discharged into the ground from septic lanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domritic sewage; industrial, Containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size Of the aystem, (be number of such syslems, (he number of houses to be served (if applicable), Or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve - (STAFF COKM_ENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method Of collection And disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water now? Will this water flow Into other waters? If so, describe. -(STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? 1f so, generally describe. L)n (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. N 1A (STAFF COMKENTS) Pite 8 of 24 CHKLT 0,001 �NOV-93 cit- 1 -9-7'­3 3 3 0 0 4. Plants 9. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: aldcr, maple, aspen, other. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. shrubs pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: V/ other types of vegetation: n (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? o n e- (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the 31te. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7.- -d -9 -:3 3 d. ProPosed landscapouse of native plants, or other matcrIals site, if any: toopreserve or enhance vegetation on the — -------------- (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals Check or circle any birds and animals Which have been observed on or near the site or arc known to be on or near (he site: 1\) I A birds; hawk, heron, C2glC, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any tbreatened or endangered species known to be On or near the site. .None - (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site parl of a migration route? If so, crplain. (STAFF COMMENTS) P890 10 of 24 CHYLTDOOINOV 93 KXM MS P E A I t-, : t:.j-1 1 `:�7- -3 3 3 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: (STAFF -COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources IL What kinds of energy (electric, natural gm, oil,.wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. I— I I t (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation featvres are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed me,asures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: (STA." COMMENTS) �r 14 r t-.7 ' .3 3 3 7. Environmentid Healti, IL Are there any enviroamctital health h-azArds, including exposure to toxJc chemiciag, risk of fire and 6'plo3ion, spill, or hazardous wasic, (hat could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. N o, (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N o n P- (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control envi ronmental health hazards, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise Whitt types of noise exisi in the area which may affect your pr oject (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? .tQ (STAFF COMMENTS) CHXLT D001-HOV-9) pasc t2 or24 t (2) What 0 30101ed with the project on 4 Short-term or types in cvcls of noise would be created by r its loog-ter7n bitsis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise ,would come from the site- ma'k . r\ � r a v n � -�-Ame- 0 u � C-� 9-.:.-50 Q,'30 t': Oern `110 cA (i. t 3 o!p. rn Yo . 'rn. V r CA" C- (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Land and Shoreline Use L Wba( is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? PC. r) \�J a S- 0, WCK-\A �X-14 k CA— ry\o,,v- or\A -a- kxs'e-A cv-:�' -0, r)-\ 0 1 Al C),V\ (R� � ( e, k-� '12-) aLL4 A- CL (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page '1004 d Ej�.,: 1 C. Describe any 1(rucson the site. nc V- (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? -ND. (STAFF C�MMENTS) r� What Is the current zoning classification of the site? _jU C— (STAFF COMMENTS) f. What Is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? V C— (STAFF COMM-ENTS) g. If applicable, what is'the current shoreline master plan designation of (be site? (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 14 of24 CHUTDOCNI-MOV-9) -.3 3 3 Has any part of A been classified 1'3 an "tn . vironmentally Altivc" area? If so, specify. - No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would rejide or work In the completed project? (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, If any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Propos-ed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with exisling and projected.land uses and plans, if any: I I . I I I I I (STAFF COMMENTS) Pan 0 of 24 9. Housing 0 a. Approximately how many units would be proyided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low,locorue housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, If any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or 10 W. income housing, --N I R (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N [A (STAFF COM-MENTS) 10. Aesthetics R. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle ex-terior building material(s) proposed? .. t E, Y, � �'- V'k Y - ) 9 - (STAFF COMMENTS) Pa ge 16 of 2 4 -:3 3 J b. What views in the*ediate vicinity would be altered or obstrufk? (STAFF COMMENTS) ce Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic Impacts, if any: NIA (STAFF COMMENTS) Ught and Glare A. WhAt type of light or glare will the proposal pr oduce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N c)a e-, (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? U p n e- (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off-iite sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? (STAFF COMMENTS) -74-- -:3 3 d. Proposed measures t0duce or control light and glare impacts, ifto N (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Remotion A. What de3ignated and informal recreational opportunities are in (he immediate Yicinity? A (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, If any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Past It OfI4 CKKLT.D0C\1.N0V-9) .7 t- : :.1,j 1 -8 3 J 13. Historic and Cultural PreSCMAtiOn A. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nationat., state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? if so, generally describe - (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Gener&Jly describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or culturai importance known to be on or next to the site- N 114 (STAFF COMMENTS) c- Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: N JA -- (STAYF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation R. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street sysiern. Show on site plans, If 2ny. Ma I \�� . - b nd a r �--j e- n �-(- ,J+ n (STAFF COMM-ENTS) r� A 3 3 b. Is site currently by pubile trAnsit? If no, what is Ilic a imate distance to the ocaregi tritniii slop? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How Inany parking spaces would (he compided project have7 HOW MMY Would the Droiect clirninntP9 (STAFF COMT4ENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to- existing roads or sireets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whe(her public or private). -Nn. (STAFF COMMENTS) Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) NBC 20 or 24 f. How many vehicular ots, per day would be generated by the compfeeld project? If known, indicate wben' peak volumes would occur. ri CL q IU V-e-Ck k q e-1V-\ k C) -5c) �-kDo"J (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any., IQ I (STAFF COMMENTS) IS. Public Services IL Would the project result in an increajed need for Public iervices (for example: fire protection, police pro(ection, health care, schools, other)? Jf so, generally describe, No. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control dirftt impacts on public services, if any: N I A (STAFF COMMENTS) Pate 2 1 of 24 -- t- . I - -�17 -3 3 3 -16. Utilities SL Circle utilities currently available at the sitc: (,/C�Icctric�ity Septic SySteni, other: . �&�tural tiaswa�ter��crusc service, (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction Activities on the site or In the Immediate vicinity which might be needed. NIA (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submined Page 22 of 2 4 -97-23-� t D. sUPPLEM-ENTAL SHEET*R NONPROXECT ACTIONS 10 (do not use this sheetfor project actions) secause these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering tbm queslions, be aware of the c)ctent (hc proposal, or the typcs of activities likely to rmll from the proposal, would affect the item at 2 greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general temis. 1. How would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water; emissioos to air; production, storage, or relcale 0( toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? N I is, Proposed meanires to protect or conserve plants, animals, Fish, or mHrine life are; W 1p, 3. Uow would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resourecs? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natura.1 resources are: Nec 21 of24 4. How would the proposal be likely to*or affect environmentally sen3itive aresuearem dcslpjkted (or eligible or under swdy) for governmental protection; such as park%, wildernesi, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, blitotic or cultural sites, wetlands, noodplain3, or prime far I mlamds? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: S. How would (he proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 6. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use.impacts are: t\) I Pt How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transpor-tation,or public services and utilities? AIR Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: i\j 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state. or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environmcn.l. KI Page 24 of 24 r ... - : -(-,I �- �- '.I -- :4. --:3 3 �080H TRZ�FHC C0M_SUL7/%H78 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING o TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE o SUITE 100 - EVERETT, WA 98201 o PH: (425) 339-8266 o FAX: (425) 258-2922 June 2, 1999 mvmo Mr. Gordy Hyde 3 - Xg City of Edmonds, Engineering Dept. 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Seattle Baptist Church in Edmonds; 24228 76th Avenue W; File No. CU-99-45 Revised -Off-Site Mitigation for Proposed Development; GTC Project No. 99-054 Dear Mr. Hyde: Per our phone conversation, Gibson Traffic Consultants (GTC) has revised the off -site mitigation proposed in our May 10th traffic impact analysis for Seattle Baptist Church. The off -site mitigation consisted of mitigation fee calculations. Recommended Off -Site Improvements/Mitigation The City, -.h,as.,,-.a mitigation,; fee �of-:;$24Q.06 per weekday p.m. peak hour trip generated by developrn s .eqt in r the: site. -:vicinity;! -imp I This fee is based on 4c�tin capacity improvements. .9 transportation improvement projects included in the City's 6-Year TIP. Per the trip distribution in,,Qur-, traffic study,. � SeattleliBaptist Church would add'35% of its 12 total weekday p.m. peak hour -trips to the SR-99 corridor improvements. Thus, the Seattle Baptist Church project should pay the City of Edmonds a mitigation fee of $1,010.77 (12 x 35% x $240.66/p.m. peak trip). We trust that this memorandum letter adequately addresses the off -site mitigation issues for the proposed Seattle Baptist Church in Edmonds. If you have any questions on GTC's analysis or findings, please feel free to call me at (425) 339-8266. Thanks, Gordy. Sincerely, GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS9 INC. P.S. 'A COUNTS/SURVEYS o SITE IMPACTS o LOS ANALYSIS o EIS o HEARINGS o SAFETY o SIGNALS o PARKING 0 MEMORANDUM Date: May 17,1999 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer Subject: CU Application for Seattle Baptist Church at 24228 — 76" Ave. W. (CU-99-45) The traffic report submitted is approved. The applicant and the City Engineer are in the process of agreeing upon an appropriate mitigation package, but the submittal is complete at this time. Prior to approving the necessary building improvement permits, the applicant must provide the following items: A copy of the agreement regarding. sharing parking with your neighbor. Submit parking configuration plan. Show driveway width, cross section and slope. The applicant must -comply with the conditions of any future applications. The Engineering -Di-v-ision.has no othercomments onthe subject application._ City of Edmonds Development Services Department Er5 ILE SREET ADDRESS CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 7110 - 210TH ST. S.W. - EDMONDS, WA 98026 - (425) 771-0235 - FAX (425) 744-6057 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION 411 C. 18,413 August 15, 1991 Mr. Scott Parrish, Manager World Gym, 24228 76th Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Water Leak Credit Dear Mr. Parrish, I have reviewed the circumstances involving your water service leak which occurred this past winter. We calculate there were 308 units of water that were lost, above your historical consumption pattern. Our standard leak credit policy allows us to charge you only for the wholesale cost of the water lost plus a 15% administrative charge. In addition, there is no charge for sewer service for the 308 units of water. A total of $1004.75 will be credited to your account. According to our records, World Gym has an outstanding balance of $2951.52 due as of July 15, 1997. Adjusting for the credit of $1004.75, World Gym currently has an outstanding water and sewer balance of $1946.77. We will require this amount to be paid in full by Noon, September 2, 1997. If not paid in full, your. water service will be terminated until such time as it is paid in full. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or Jim Waite, Water/Sewer Supervisor, at 771-0235. Sincerely, Noel F. Miller, P.E. Superintendent of Public Works cc: Jim Waite, Water/Sewer Supervisor Chuck Day, Finance Manager NM/hm wordata\water\worIdgym e Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International —,Hekinan, Japan STREET?DDRESS H.S. CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 7110-21 OTH ST.S.W. * EDMONDS, WA 98026 a 1206) 771-0235 - FAX (206) 744-6057 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION S t May 9, 1997 World Gym 24228 - 76th Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Termination of Water Service - Account #607850 It has come to my attention that your business is now and has been delinquent on water/sewer payments since April of- 1995. The last payment received towards this account was on March 3, 1997 which still left a balance of $650.53. Since then, you have received a bill that included the water leak which occurred in February. A ".leak credit" adjustment may be available for this bill with your application request in writing and including copies of related repair bills. On April 17, the next month's bill was sent and as of today we have received no explanation of your delinquency on any recent billings. Please contact Chuck Day at 775-2525 or Scott Highland at 771-0235 as soon as possible. If no payment or specific arrangements are made regarding this account, water service will be terminated on June 2, 1997. Sincerely, . Noel F. Miller, P.E-. Superintendent of Public Works SH/lk cc: Chuck Day, Account Manager Ilene Larson, Utility Billing Clerk Scott Highland, Acting Water/Sewer Supervisor wordata\water\#607850 e Incorporated August 11, 1890 9 . Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan UMMASMNT City of Edmonds PAGE 3 04/16/47 12:38 Print Master File Account Details Account: 6-07850 History m-m.-m-m-m- 1) ........................................................ Water Surcharge Sewer Misc Fees DEP: Unapp Total 2) DEP: Balance Read Date Sery Days Read I Read 2 Read 3 Consumptio Avg/Day -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Water 08/01/96 30 20688 . 0 0 60 2.000 B 1 106.62 6.13 133.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 245.95 Balance: 1045.81 08/12/96 R 1 133.92- 7.70- 68.41- 0.00 0.00 0.00 '210.032- Balance: 799.86 07/17/96 Water 07/02/96 28 20628 0 0 54 1.928 B 1 98.82 5.68 119.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 224.38 Balance: 1009.89 06118196 Water 06/04/96 32 20574 0 0 68 2.125 B 1 117.02 6.73 150.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 274.71 Balance: 785.51 06/17/96 R 1 85.89- 0.00 114.11- 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.001 Balance; 510.80 05/31/96 R 1 72.14- 5.76- 122.10- 0.00 0.00 0.00 '200.00- Balance: 710.80 05/24/96 R 1 191.51- 13.23- 295.26- 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00- Balance: 910.80 05/16/96 Water 05/03/96 31 20506 0 0 76 2.451 B 1 127.42 7.33 168.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 303.47 Balance- 1410.80 04/3.7/96 Water 04/02/96 28 20430 0 0 81 2.892 B 1 133.92 7.70 179.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 321.44 Balance: 1107.33 04/02/96 R 1 230.36- 14.35- 301.78- 0.00 0.00 0.00 546.49-: Balance: 7 85.89 03/19/96 Water 03/05/96 29 20349 0 0 55 1.89,6 B 1 100.12 5.76 122.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 227.98 Balance: 1332.38 03/08/96 R 1 211.94- 12.19- 275.87- 0.00 0.00 0.00 -SOO.00- Balance: 1104.40 02/16/96 Water 02/05/96 28 20294 0 0 67 2.392 B 1 115.72 6.65 148.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 271.11 Balance; 1604.40 01/18/96 Water 01/08/96 34 20227 0 0 66 1.941 B 1 114.42 6.58 146.52 0.00 �.00 0.00 267.52 Kos Balance: 1333.29 jft\tJ ORLD GI tA WZ*2-?-Ia UMKASMNT City of Edmonds PAGE 2 04/16/97. 12:138 Print Master File Account Details Account: 6-07850 History .................................................................. T ............. 1) Water Surcharge Sewer Misc Fees DEP: Unapp Total 2) DEP: Balance Read Date Sery Days Read 1 Read 2 Read 3 Consumptio Avg/Day ------------------------ 7 ------------------------------------------------------- 04/17/97 Water 04/03/97 27 21532 0 0 59 2.185 B 1 105.32 6.06 130.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 - (:� Balance: 2267.59 03/14/97 Water 03/07/97 28 21473. 0 0 13.357 (T. r � - � .." I I 1 514.82 29.60 830.28 0.00 0.00 0.01- #4 03/03/97 Balance: 2025.23 R 1 155.03- 11.22- 133.75- 0.00 0.00 0.00 .300.00-� Balance: 650.53 02/24/97 R 1 135.22- 7.78- .157.00- 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00-' Balance: 9SO.53 02/21/97 R 1 211.11- 6.88- 282.01- 0.00 0.00 0.00 '500.00- Balance: 1250.53 02/20/97 Water 02/07/97 31 21099 0 0 88 2.838 B 1 143.02 8.22 195.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 346.60 Balance: 1750.53 eL- 01/16/97 Water 01/07/97 32 21011 0 0 65 2.031 B 1 113.12 6.50 144.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 263.92 I Balance: 1403.93 12/17/96 Water 12/06/96 32 20946 0 0 55 1.718 B 1 100.12 5.76 122.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 227.98 Balance: 1140.01 11/18/96 Water 11/04/96 32 20891 0 0 51 1.593 11;6 B 1 94.92 5.46 113.22 0.00 0.00 Q.00 213.60 Balance: 912.03 10/18/96 R 1 113.95- 11.81- 153.56- 0.00 0.00 0.00 279.32-" Balance: 698.43 10/17/96 Water 10/03/96 29 20840 0 0 82 2.827 'BALAWa "AS WO-T BICCI� PA110 S""C-C B 1 135.22 7.78 182.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 325.04 APR% L Or 195S. 10/14/96 Balance: 977.75 -"-z9S R 1 117.02- 6.73- 201.25- 0.00 0.00 0.00 325.00- r7 i o-) -F:o--m -r000 -ro cAL Balance: 652.71 '5 ACA< 10/07/96 R 1 127.42- 7.33- 215.25- 0.00 0.00 0.00 350.00-- Balance: 977.71 09/19/96 Water 09/04/96 34 20758 0 0 70 2.058 B 1 119.62 6.88 155.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 281.90 Balance: 1327.71 08/19/96 UMMASMNT City of Edmonds PAGE 04/lE/A7. 12.�'38 Print Master File Account Details Account: 6-07850 Screen 1 ................................................................................ *** Tenant Information *** Owner Information 01 Name NORTHWESTERN GYM 09 Name NORTHWESTERN GYM 02 Care of WORL-0 it 10 Care of 03 Addr 1 24228 76TH AVE W 11 Addr 1 04 Addr 2 12 Addr 2 05 City EDMONDS 13 City 06 State WA 07 Zip 98026-9104 14 State 15 Zip 08 Phone (206) 778-2582 16 Phone (000) 000-0000 ............ = .............. IS Water 916.29 --- Meter Reading Information— 19 Surcharge 50.38 17 Location 24228 76TH AV W 20 Sewer 1300.92 Current Previous .21 Previous Due 2025.23 24 Curr 59 25 Date 04/03/97 26 03/07/97 22 Current Due 242.36 27 YTD 586 28 Rdng 21532 29 .21473 23 Balance 2267.59 32 LTD 2019 30 Rdng 0 31 0 ..... = ... —.z ............. 33 Meter #: 2693 35 Extension Dt 00/00/00 34 Location 36 Acct Setup 00/00/00 NE COR PROP ON 242 37 Last Pay 03/03/97 38 Last Bill 04/17/97 39 Due Date 03/28/97 40 Status A Screen 2 1 ............ — ......... .............................................. ** Misc Codes ** Rate Codes *** ** Units ** ***Meter = ....... Info*** 01 Status A 14 Water 610 1 1/2 15 1.00 22 Meter BrndSR 02 Type 05 16 Surcharge001 TAX 17 1.00- 23 Meter #: 2693 03 Cycle 01 18 Sewer 611 1 1/2 19 1.00 24 ID Meter 04 In/Out 1 20 Misc 000 NOCHG 21 0.00 25 typ e M C 05 Sort Cd 0000 26 # Readings 1 06 Est Flag N 27 Mass Code HCP 07 #Tenant 1 28 Install Dt 01/16/79 08 #Owner 0 29 Shutoff Dt 00/00/00 09 Respon? T 30 Route 601 31 Sequ 31400 10 Penalty N 32 Codes SE1 B 11 Past Note T 33 ADDR. CODE 1 00 12 Shut Note T 34 ADDR CODE 2 00 13 Account Info STREET FILE October.7, 1981. MEMO TO:. Architectural'Design Board FROM: -Dan Smith Planning/Engineering Inspector SUPJECT: ADB MEETING/OCTOBER T, 1981 ADB-64-81 JOSEPH FOSHAY Review of sign for "Calliels Hair Fashions", a beauty shop at 301 3rd Avenue North. (RM-1.5) No comment. ADB-70-81 GENERAL COMMERCIAL CORP. Review of sign for 33 unit condominium, "Edmonds Estates' at 7510 208th Street S.W. (RM-1.5) .No comment.- ADB-73-81 ED CHEIN Review of storage shed for apartment building at. 7806 196th Street.S.W. (RM-1.5) No comment. ADB-74-81 PHILIP JOHANSEN Review of sign for "Antique Clocks" at 537 Main Street. (BC) No comment. ADB-65-81 JAMES MARTIN Review or storage shed for maintenance of property at 18606 ' 76th Avenue West. (BN) No comment. ADB-3-81. BERT STOLE Review of —site, elevations ' and landscaping for remodel of single family home to professional office building at 611 Main Street. (BC) The design as submitted is acceptable. The parking will be allowed to back into the alleyway. Drainage system per city drainage engineers require- ments, due with building permit. ADB-66-81 FIRST SERVE RACQUETBALL CLUB Review t site, elevations and landscaping for addition at 24228 76th*Avenue West. (BN) The new parking is acceptable as designed. A detailed development plan showing all new utility systems, parking improvements, drainage systems etc. must be 1� 0 Memo to ADB Members. Page 2 - October 7, 1981 be turned in and approved by the City Engineer prior to Building Permit review. Owner will be - required to sign a 'support of LID form' for future improvements in 242nd Street S.W. ADB-67-81 DOCES ENTERPRISES eview of remodel 24111 Highway 99. of existing facility at (CG) . New parking area'as.-presented appears.satisfactory. ADB-�68-81 'THE-'CALLISON PARTNERSHIP Review of site,.elevations and landscaping for remodel of.bu.ilding..at.120 5th Avenue'.South.--...(BC)* The parking lot as.shown,jLs-Acce��ab'l'e.',.-Permanent curb stops must-be.provided.for all,parkin*g stalls. Also, the city'shdll require that I the -sidewalk paneis that are broken,or damaged along the Dayton* Street and 4th Avenue property lines -be replaced. ADB-69-81 DAN AND MEL'..BROOK . Review of sign, "Yankee Trader" at 117 5th Avenue North. (BC) No comment. ADB-71-81 JERILYN CHENEY BRUSSEAU Review of landsca'p3ng. awnings and parking addition to "Brusseau's" at.117 5th Avenue South.- (BC) Existing curb cuts on 5th to be removed and sidewalk to be brought to city standards. ADt-72-81 DANIEL BRADY Review of proposed professional office building at 8326 196th.Street S.W. (RM-2.4) DS/mt The parking/backout-areas to be paved per City standards. CITY OF EDMONDS 'L El 'APPLICATION to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD DATE41_:�� 1�-J FILE # SITE PLAN BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA_,Z RECEIPT # SIGN EXHIBITS FEE RECPT PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: HEARING DATE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE Mg. 1�517r-VLV_* WAU-Te4��_ PHONE -7 C��-7 ADDRESS- -2-+ -z -L e -1 Vi k *W_ - U) - - T�m ZIP CODE I&OZO ARCHITECT/DESIGNER L,"(C' P61-JrPOO 44ATV&T� teLLEWO PHONE 560-2- PROPERTY ADDRESS 'A\JC-; ZONING tQ LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: 1 . Building Plans - Preliminary Site Plan Final Landscape Plan 2. Sign Elevations ---Site Plan Landscape Plan- 3. Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERT DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAI Elevations -ro F__)090ru.� . WV4444T RMAL Pr "PM0#JArL_ APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT -As- ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK _Aos- RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The mission for public officials and the staff property for the purpose of inspection and undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per - of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject posting attendant to this application. n a t u r e �of A p �pl i c a �nt LEGAL DESCRIPTION The north 384 ft. of Tract 10, Lake McAleer Five Acre.Tracts, according to plat thereofrecorded in vol. 5 of plots, pg. 48 records of Snohomish County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 10 ft. and the east 40 ft. thereof conveyed to the City of Edmonds, for road purposes by quit claim deed recorded June 9, 1964 under Auditor's File No. 1703055; and EXCEPT the south 150 ft. of the north 160 ft. of the west 125 ft. of the east 165 ft. thereof; and EXCEPT the south 115 ft. of the west 110 ft. of the east 150 ft. thereof; and EXCEPT that portion of the west 2 ft. of the east 152 ft. of the south 115 ft. thereof lying south of that certain easement described in instrument recorded October 19, 1966 under Auditor's File No. 1905899. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington I lid ,31, z Ic -j � CL :w R; LL I I Fit, pim -IiTL-i I Ira ! s —NO)EEWF nHIHON009Z ��JnA31139 - 0013 1 Ifl'; -.��M —d A 83 S=-.L- S H kfEOJ--- S NO I I I G CLV=- I % , A-1 �j I z A- I c" I' SIGNED 7�5 DATE SIGNED � A� - e4S469 ,.�fND PARTS I AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT. PM PAK (50 SETS) 4P 469 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. CITY OF EDMONDS 0 6 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON APPLICATION.TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT File No & Date Fee 60- dv APO'S Rect. No.'& 2 HEARING,DATE 19 &D �6e*FWAY APPLICANT: Lao(s/@Lop MM4*DRESS '$.PAA�ft WA. PHONE. 1-11-t;(002_- ^11f604 J164 CA&M I Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: — OWNER: ADDRESS ;LqLz4 -7(AN&LA PHO E12MiaLMS tiE.-1145 _0V-P7 LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 5F_f� A-MA.6* AEC) To be completed by the Planning Division: Use Zone 41V Legal description checked and approved by: Date: VICINITY SKETCH: Examp 6U6.)Tr_r vltop� PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EXAMPLE, INDICATING NORTH. CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: -16 thAVE. W. wwpwr PROPERre RECEIVEZ) SEP 0 81981 DI: - DETAILS OF PROPOSED USAGE: AMrnoAMN;A_W�;o M-v,,o32gM9M-MT Awr!�r. x J0 rr. tawp- &*,kemwe /,00er, z*�T, x 5c) Er-. Walakl ff-MkiWA Vp6A 6) 10 r-T.,kion. L-00-Ere- P-000 -ro oaevrivjo R&z4uerre-aW PAOU __0 C-0 M 6 SEkTa-ture ol Applicant, -Owner or Representative RELEASEMOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned applicant, his heirs ana assigns, in consideration for the City processing the -application agrees to release, indemnifv, defend and hold the City of Edmonds. harmless from anv and all damages and/or claims for damages'. including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from anv action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant,. his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its permission for public .officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of*insDection and posting attendant to this application. �—O-C.J V crp� -licant, Own �ror I gy n �o �Ap� v I i �ca n t �.0 r o r Representative 94" LEGAL DESCRIPTION The north 384 ft. of Tract 10, LAke McAleer Five Acre Tracts, according to plat thereofrecorded in vol. 5 of plots, pg. 48 records of Snohomish County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 10 ft. and the east 40 ft. thereof conveyed to the City of Edmonds, for road purposes by quit claim deed recorded June 9, 1964 under Auditor's File No.-1703055; and EXCEPT the south 150 ft. of the north 160 ft. of the west 125 ft. of the east 165 ft. thereof; and EXCEPT the south 115 ft..of the west IiO ft. of the east.150 ft. thereof; and EXCEPT that portion of the west 2 ft. of the east 152 ft. of the south 1 ' 15 ft. thereof lying south of that certain easement described in instrument recorded October 19, 1966 under Auditor's File No. 1905899. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington F� Z U .4 0 U W co 0 E- Z �D 0 CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ILE RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION $RTBEET A. *Ad -dress or vicinity, of Construction �24228 76 AV W - Plat 4 167�z -9- o Owner: WashincIton Natural GA C Name 805 156 AV NE Mailing Address Bellevue, Wash. 9800 City, . State, Zip Code Contractor: Same As Above Name Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code PTemit N21—/ V Issue Date 7-7—?/ 0 Permit Issued To: Type of Work to be Done: Valve Maintenance Work in Connection With: 0 Sub or Plat 1?F Single Fam, ly El Comml. / Ind. 0 Apt. Condo. Pavement Cut: El Yes El No State License Number Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit must be availabigrat the job site Signature: purppses at all times. July 6, 1981 Okney Agent THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: �! Time Authorized:' Gd after ZO days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee: Security Deposit: Receipt No.: Fund Ill Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 CASCADEO Ll-C2375 PRINTED IN U.S.A.* SENDER: DETACH THIS PART AND FILE FOR FOLLOW UPj � .;t JAMES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON Nut Rea, Wa4wAl 14d"C&&4I 47"a ENGINEERS 9 SURVEYORS * PLANNERS 324 Main Street e Edmonds, Washington 98020 e (206i 775-3434 d e May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 1 of 3 NS GISTE 10 �4�" � RECEIVED STORM DRAINAGE RETENTION/DETENTION CALCULATIONS MAY 2 G 1978 FOR PROPOSED FIRST SERVE RACQUET COURTS Public Works Dept. IN SE4, SE4, SECTION-31, T27N, R4E, W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV, EDMONDSP WASHINGTON EXAMINED BY 11(10— DATE_4107 REMARKS__4f Site Information y��� Area = 1.77 Acre Average = 2% +- Northerly Site*Conditions r Previously graded site w/light scrub growth on Westerly portion of property with existing asphalt drive. Estimated runoff coefficient = 0.30 Using the'Yrjanainen and Warren Method for simple retention/detention basin design, the following calculations are to determine the required volume of retention for. this development. Time to Concentration = 410/0.4)(60) + 10 min. = 14.9 min. Intensity = i = 1.30 in/hr. @ 10-year storm frequency (Seattle Curve) Existing C = 0.30 Prorating future C Building Area = 0.27 Ac @ 0.90 Asphalt Area, excluding Asphalt Drive = 0.50 Ac @ 0.85 Planter Area = o.6 Ac @ 0.20 Area to Remain Undeveloped = o.40 Ac @ 0.30 0, 4 0� ir-L (0.27)(0-90) + (0-50)(0-85) + (0.60)(0.20) + (0.40)(0-30) — = 0.511"/ O"?o 1.77 /,-77 Q ex%isting = Qu = CIA = (0-30)(1-30)(1-77) = 0.69 c.f.s,. ,� MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING 9 WATER SUPPLY'* WASTE TREATMENT e SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERI , NG AIRPO.RT PLANNING & DESIGN a MARINA'S 0 PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT e FEASIBILITY STUDIES 0 0 May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 2 of 3 Q allowable = 0.69 c.f.s. Qo Q Allowable 0.69 0.76 c.f.s. Ac. C-"' Acreage x ruture-Runoff CoefTri—crl-e—nt = (1-77)(07V Future Assume orifice outlet conditions exist T -25 + - 41-762/Qo -25 + 4-1-762/0-76 = 23.1 . 5 Vs 2820T -4o QoT (2820)(23-15 -40 (0-76)(23-15) T + 25 23-15 + 25 652.06 ft3/Acre C Future V total Vs x'Ac x C future = (652.06)(1-77)(0-51) = 588.61 Total Required Storage = 588.61 ft3 /,- Sizing Orifice Q max. = 0.69 c.f.s. Q = CdA F2g—h Assume h 4.01 0.69 = 0.62 A 4(64 —4)(4) Solving for A= . 0.69 0.0693 ft2 = 3.56" orifice 0.62 4(64.4)(4) Uses 31" orifice = 0.0668 therefore, h will change 2 2 h 0.69 4.311 (0.62)(O.-OTW /2g (I ) /64.4 V 0 May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 3 of 3 Sizing Retention/Detention System Total Storage Required = 588.61 ft3 Install 327 I.f. 8" Helical 14-Ga. Aluminum Storm Sewer Volume of Subsurface storage Volume of CB No. I = 54.16 ft3 Vo'lume of CB No. 2 = 21.04 ft3 Volume of CB No. 3 = 21.27 ft3 Volume of CB No. 4 = 19-78 ft3 Vol ume of CB No. 5 = 9.25 ft3 ' Volume of CB No. 6 = 10.40 ft3 Volume of Pi�e Storage = 114.16 ft3 Total Subsurface Volume = 249-76 ft3 At CB No. 2 top of grate is 0.5' be.low overflow pipe in CB No. 1, therefore, surface ponding will occur. Total ponding volume in this asphalted concrete parking area = 363.28 ft3, with maximum water surface elevation = 298.95. Total Volume of Retention System = 613-04 ft3 613-04 ft3 > 588.61 ft3 ok 0-- JAMES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON gee, f ILE Rea, ft44&e&a & AjoaWW, IoCC. ENGINEERS 9 SURVEYORS e PLANNERS 324 Main Street e Edmonds, Washington 98020 0 (2061 775-3434 May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 1 of 3 Q/STE STORM DRAINAGE RETENTIONIDETENTION CALCULATIONS 'ONAL FOR PROPOSED FIRST SERVE RACIQUET COURTS IN SE4, SE4, SECTION 31, T27N, R4E, W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV, EXAMINED EDMONDS, WASHINGTON BY DATE REMARKS Site Information Area = 1.77 Acre Average = 2% +- Northerly Site*Conditions - Previously graded site w/light scrub growth on Westerly portion of property with existing asphalt drive. Estimated runoff coefficient = 0.30 Using the Yrjanainen and Warren Method for SiMple retention/detention basin design, the following calculations are to determine the required volume of retention for. this development. Time to Concentration 410/0.4)(60). + 10 min. = 14.9 min. Intensity = i = 1.30 in/hr. @ 10-year storm frequency (Seattle Curve) Existing C = 0.30 Prorating future C Building Area = 0.27 Ac @ 0.90 Asphalt Ar ' ea, excluding Asphalt Drive = 0.50 Ac @ 0.85 Planter Area = 0.6 Ac @ 0.20 Area to Remain Undeveloped = DAD Ac @ 0.30 .(0.27) (0-90) + (0-50) (0-85) + (o.6o) (0.20) + (0.40) (0-30) - 0.51 1.77 t Q ex,i s t i ng = Qu = C I A = (0 - 30) (1. 30) 0. 77) = 0. 69 c. f . s. MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING* WATER SUPPLY *WASTE TREATMENT* SURVEYS C7 CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN 0 MARINAS 0 PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT a FEASIBILITY STUDIES May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 2 of 3 Q allowable = 0.69 c.f.s. Qo Allowable 0.69 0.76 c.f.s. Ac. C Acreage x Future Runoff Coefficient = (1-77)(07TT Future Assume orifice outlet conditions exist T = -25 + 4-1762/Qo -25 + �1-762/0-76 = 23-15 Vs 2820T -4o QoT (2820)(23-15 -40 (0-76)(23-15) T + 25 23-15 + 25 652.06 ft3/Acre C Future V total = Vs x Ac x C future =.(652.06)(1-77)(0-51) = 588.61 Total Required Storage = 588.61 ft3 Sizing Orifice Q max. = 0.69 c.f.s. Q = CdA ,F2 'gh Assume h 4.01 0.69 = 0.62 A -1—(64—.4)(4) Solving for A= o.69 o.o693 ft 2 3.56" orifice 0.82 4(64.4)(4) Uses 31" orifice = 0.'0668 therefore, h will change 2 2 h Q 0.69 4-31- CdA (0.62)(O.O-6W /2g /64.4 May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 3 of 3 Sizing Retention/Detention System Total Storage Required = 588.61 ft3 Install 327 I.f. 8" Helical 14-Ga. Aluminum Storm Sewer Volume of Subsurface storage Volume of CB No. 1 = 54.16 ft3 Volume of CB No. 2 = 21.04 ft3 Volume of CB No. 3 = 21.27 ft3 Volume of CB No. 4 = 19-78 ft3 Vol.ume of CB No. 5 = 9.25 ft3 Volume of CB No. 6 = 10.40 ft3 Volume of Pi�e Storage = 114.16 ft3 Total Subsurface Volume = 249-76 ft3 At CB No. 2 top of grate is 0.5' below overflow pipe in CB No. 1, therefore, surface ponding will occur. Total ponding volume in this asphalted concrete parking area = 363.28 ft3, with maximum water surface elevation = 298.95. Total Volume of Retention System .613-04 ft3 613-04 ft3 > 588.61 ft3 ok JAMES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON Rea, 7&44&&9 4dJ4e4T&4, I", ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS e co "%%Z-'S/0NAL 0,1010 Site Information Area = 1.77 Acre 324 Main Street 9 Edmonds, Washington 98020 0 (206) 775-3434 May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 1 of 3 STORM DRAINAGE RETENTION/DETENTION CALCULATIONS FOR PROPOSED FIRST SERVE RACQUET COURTS CITY OF EDMONDS P. VV. DEPT. ENGINEERING DI IN SE4, SE4,_SECTION.31, T27N, R4E, W.M. EXAMINED DATE W64 BY EDMONDSP WASHINGTON REMARKS_,& ,KXjj4P0L-- Average = 2% 4-' Northerly Site'Conditions - Previously graded site w/light scrub growth on Westerly portion of property with existing asphalt drive. Estimated runoff coefficient = 0.30 Us.ing the Yrjanainen and Warren Method for simple retention/detention'basin design, the following calculations are to determine the required volume of retention for. this development. Time to Concentration 410/0.4)(60) + 10 min. = 14.9 min. intensity i = 1.3 0 in/hr. @ 10-year storm frequency (Seattle Curve) Existing C 0.30 Prorating future C Building Area = 0.27 Ac @ 0.90 Asphalt Area, excluding Asphalt Driive = 0.50 Ac @ 0.85 Planter Area = 0.6 Ac @ 0.20 Area to Remain Undeveloped = o.40 Ac @ 0.30 (0.27) . (0 - 90) + (0. 50) (0. 85) + (0. 60) (0. 20) + (0. 40) (0-30) - 0.51 1.77 Q ex,isting = Qu = CIA = (0-30)(1-30)(1-77) = 0.69 c.f.s. MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING 9 WATER SUPPLY,* WASTE TREATMENT e SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERI , �G AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN 9 MARINAS 0 PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 9 FFASIHII try STUDIES 0 May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 2 of 3 Q allowable = 0.69 c.f.s. Qo Q Allowable 0.69 0.76 c.f.s. Ac. C Acreage x Future Runoff CoefTf—c�ient (1-77)(0-31T = Future Assume orifice outlet conditions exist T = -25 + ^1-1762/Qo -25 + �-1762/0-76 = 23-15. Vs 2820T 40 QoT (2820)(23-15 -4o (0-76)(23-15) T + 25 23-15 + 25 652.o6 ft3/Acre C Future V.total = Vs x Ac x C future = (652.06)(1-77)(0-51) 588.61 Total Required Storage = 588.61 ft3 Sizing Orifice Q max. = 0.69 c.f.s. Q = CdA F2gh Assume h = 4.01 0.69 = 0.62 A 4(-64.4)(4) - Solving for A= 0.69 o.o693 ft 2 = 3.56" orifice' 0.62 4(64.4)(41 Uses 31" orifice = 0.0668 therefore, h will change 2 2 h Q 0.69 (--Td­A (0.62)(O.O-MT /2g (I ) /64.4 4.31' F, -I L—A May 23, 1978 File No. 5330-B Page 3 of 3 Sizing Retention/Detention System Total Storage Required = 588.61 ft3 Install 327 I.f. 8" Helical 14-Ga. Aluminum Storm Sewer Volume of Subsurface storage Volume of CB No. I = 54.16 ft3 Volume of CB No. 2 = 21.04 ft3 Volume of CB No. 3 = 21.27 ft3 Volume of CB No. 4 = 19-78 ft3 Vol ' ume of' C8 No. 5 = 9.25 ft3 Volume of CB No. 6 = 10.40 ft3 Volume of Pi�e Storage = 114.16 ft3 Tota I Subsurface Volume = 249-76 ft3 At CB No. 2 top of grate is 0.5' below overflow pipe in CB No. 1, therefore, surface ponding will occur. Total.ponding volume in this asphalted concrete parking area = 363.28 ft3, with maximum water surface elevation = 298-95. Total Volume of Retention System 613-04 ft3 613-04 ft3 > 588.61 ft3 ok CITY OF EDMOND re., WORKS DIPARTMENTj ENGINEERI G DIVISION ,"U NSTRUCTION PERMIT A CATION FORRIGHT—OF—WAY COI THIS PERMIT MUST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PUR-POSES Applicant to Complete Parts A and B A. P'ermit to be issued to : ZV 6-:5 7-4 fi T6r B L Qdrr� S lu e— For Work at:(address or vicinity) 4VZ-,?? -76 ae9 j/ e- Ll,) I Type of Work to be done: Z/V S 7-4 e- 1> R (attach drawing when applicable) Time Required -- Start: zp-�L(a Z2 Finish: Owner: 1c-/k_Sr LIZ ga,) j57or C' oox-r. Name Mailing Address City State Zip Contractor: 4<,/6-Sr6,97-6- Tj I pp_,S yN C_ Name 0-�- Mailing Address. -"' - Y.,MU &-) " " 7) t<) A city State Zip Telephone Number w e- 5; r- (.,-, &— g- 73 c a State License Number '7 '7 V — 7 -7 9 4 Telephone Number NO WORK TO.BEGIN PRIOR TO PER11IT ISSUANCE ** * Be INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held'until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is subject to inspection,and restoration in accordance with City Cod I e. A 24-hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, ext. I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature:. - Date: /0/1,/77 Owner or Agentd' C, TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY: Z./ 2 X- cc� Date Issued : /'6 14 17 Permit No.: 7..w Fee: AIS Security Bond: Time Authoriz*ed:— 22 APPROVED A— Date: /0 VVP NDS PUBLIC W051 ENTj ENGINEERING DIVISION APPLICATION FOR -RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PUNT THIS PERMIT MUST BE AVAILAB'LE AT THE JOB SITE'FOR INSPECTION PU.R.POSES' Applicant to Complete Parts A and 'B A. Pe-rmit to be issued t o : LAW.t� C0A1'Sre-VC-*r10,,3 C-0- For Work at :(address or vicinity) FIV-S-r '5eKVIF V-ACCq%JF--r C-LOg, -7(,-r'4 -4 Zll��.Zlj I . - - Type of Work to be done: comwevr sToem E%wT.-rt-Jc- -DP-Ao (attach drawing when applicable) Time Required -- Start: E7PPT 2-1 14116 Finish: or,-r 15- 1 cl 76 Owner:- 'FJPS,� gQ%*7 gLVAt3er C-LL* IJJC. Name Mailing Addr�ss city State Contractof" LAM5 C�4�-r- 'to'. Zi p Name CWL.�-DCAAV- CLEM-WeJ P-T,, v -rA Mailing Addr6'�S­ 454 O&AW M I 1A 'WMIA nono City State ZiP Telephone Nlumber State License Number Telephone..Number N,b -MOR-K'�Tb BEG-I� "PkiO*R*-TO PERMIT 'I S'S'UANCE B, INDEMITY: Ap-plicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds har-mless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be%made against the applicant or tfie , City.o,f Edmonds, or' any of-its.�-epartment , 'S .'or employees, limi - e 'he defense of any legal pr�oceedin s'inc-luding defense including or not . .. t d� to t 9 costs, court costs, and attorney fees by re'ason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the co'ntr'act I or is responsible for workmanship and materials for -a period of one year fo ' llowirig the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is subject to inspection.and restoration in accordance with City Code. A 24-hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, ext. 220. I understand that this permit mu e ailable at thNh job site for inspection purposes at'all t. iTnes. Signature: D ate O,�ner or Agent I TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY: Date Issued Permit Security Bond: 45 110.: 7E 23'z) Fee:- - C.) CIL> lf�l — Time Authorized: 1Z, D a t e APPROVED e 74 ell ;:7 CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLO11ORKS DEPARTMENTj ENGINE "G DIVISION RECEIVED OCT 3 1978 P 0!"1 FOD IGHT-OF41A CO.NSTPUCTION PUM TPubliC Works L)epl. TO WEP I I I T' MUST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES Applicant to Complete Parts A and B A, Permit to be issued to: Snohomish C'ounity P.U.D. No. 1 For Work at:(address or vicinity) 242nd Street -Southwest and-76th Avenue West Type of Work to be done: install underground power system for First Serve (attach drawing when applicable) Racquat Colirts Time' Required I Start.: October 23, 1978 —Finish:-_ one day Owner: Name W-0- # R86141 Mailing Address Please return.the permit to -the attention of Mary Bond. City State Zip Telephone Number Contractor: 'Snohomish County P.U.D. No. 1 Name State License Number P. 0. Box 1107 Mailing Address Everett Washington 98206 0 258-8416 K.'Dunlap City State Zip Telephone Number Engineer B, INDE�_NITY: Applicantunderstands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damage8, -or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, ioreseen or* unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or'the City.of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees,, including or not limi ' ted to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is zesponsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. 0 Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the f - inal street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is subject to inspection and festoration in accordance with,City Code. A 24-hour notice is requi ��k for. ins.Dection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, ext.' 220. I understand that thi permm t st be a ilable at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. turet. -7c Signature. Date:.. Ou-netrAgent C, TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY: Date Issued:/,*- Permit No. F e e Security Bond: Time Authorized: - APPROVED Bf,� �,Z D a t e oK) I JAME� k IiEID LEROY F. MIDDLETON taTfIEET FILE RECEIVED C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON JUN 2 0 1978 Rea, W&dd&rm I", ENGINEER946"'dM06RS - PLANNERS 324 Main Street 0 Edmonds, Washington 98020 e (206) 775-3434 June 20, 1978 File No. 5330-C ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR' PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF PROPOSED FIRST SERVE RAQUET COURT BLDG. PTN. TR. 10, LAKE MCALEERS 5-Acre Tracts'. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Water I each Detector Check Valve Assembly @ $5,000./ea. $ 5,000-00 1 each 2" Water Meter @ $300./ea. 300-00 58 l.f. 8" D.I.W.M. @ $11.00/l.f. 638.00 58 l.f. 2" D.I.W.M. @ $ 5.00/l.f. 290.00 Total Water $ 6,228.00 Storm Sewer 21 l.f. 12" Helical Aluminum 14 Gauge @ $9.50 I-f- $ 200.00 1 Total Storm Sewer $ 200.00 Sanitary Sewer 42 'l.f. 6" side sewer @ $8.00/l.f. $ 336.00. Total Sanitary Sewer $ 336.00 Street Removal of 65 l.f. existing curb and gutter and sidewalk - Lump Sum $ 200.00 65 I-f- 5' wide cement concrete sidewalk @ $5-00/1-f- 325-00 65 l.f. concrete curb.and gutter @ $4-50/1-f- 293-00 48 sq. yds. Concrete driveway apron @ $6.00/s.y. 288.00 100 l.f. Asphalt restoration @ $4.00/1.f. 400.00. Total Streets $ 1 5o6.00 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING 0 WATER SUPPLY WASTE I REATMENT 0 SURVI-YS Fj CADAS*1 RAL ENGINI. ERINC, AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN 0 MARINAS P6RT r, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT * FEASIBILITY STUDIES *June 20, 1978 File No. 5330-C Page No. 2 Subtotal Washington State Sales Tax @ 5.4% 10% Contingencies Total Estimated Construction Costs Bond for $ 80270-00 447-00 872.00 $ 9.589-00 $ 9,600.-00 JAMES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES FILE LLOYD H. NELSON AN 2 0 1978 Raw" - W&dwer" & '04"Wwwf: I". ENGINEERS o SIJHWQ�S o PLANNERS 324 Main Street 0 Edmonds, Washington 98020 0 �206) 775-3434 June 20, 1978 ' File No. 5330-C ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF PROPOSED FIRST SERVE RAQUET COURT BLDG. PTN. TR. 10, LAKE MCALEERS 5-Acre Tracts. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Water 1 each Detector Check Valve Assembly @ $5,000./ea. $ 5,000-00 1 each 2" Water Meter @ $300./ea. 300-00 58 I.f. 811 D.I.W.M. @ $11.00/l.f. 638.00 58 l.f. 21' D.I.W.M. @ $ 5-00/1-f- 290.00 Total Water $ 6,228.00 Storm Sewer 21 I.f. 12" Helical Aluminum 14 Gauge @ $9.50 l.f. $ 200.00 1 . Total Storm Sewer $ 200.00 Sanitary Sewer 42 l.f. 6" side sewer @ $8.00/1-f. $ 336.00 Total Sanitary Sewer $ 336.00 Street Removal of 65 l.f. existing curb and gutter and sidewalk - Lump Sum $ 200.00 65 I-f- 5' wide cement concrete sidewalk @ $5-00/1-f- 325-00 65 I-f- concrete curb.and gutter @ $4-50/1-f- 293-00 48 sq. yds. Concrete driveway apron @ $6.00/s.y. 288.00 100 I.f. Asphalt restoration @ $4.00/i.f. 400.00. Total Streets $ 1,506.00 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING 9 WATER SUPPLY WASTE TREATMENT e SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN * MARINAS PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT e FEASIBILITY STUDIES *June 20, 1978 Fi le No. 5330-C Page No. 2 Subtotal $ 8,270-00 Washington State Sales Tax @ 5.4% 447-00 10% Contingencies 872.00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 9,589-00 Bond for 9,600-00 t Reid, Middleton and Associ Inc. Engineers 0 Surveyors 0 It's EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 slag FILE Phone 775-3434 VIL%w TO Citv of Edm6nds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 [L[EU-To @)F umluzomuzuL DATE May 25, 1978 T��O. 5330-B ATTENTION Bill Nims RE: Retention & Detention System at 76th Ave. W. & 242nd St. S.W., Edmonds, WA. RECRian PdAY 2 6 1978 GENTLEMEN: Public Works Dept. - WE ARE SENDING YOU [A Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: El Shop drawings IN Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Copy of letter El Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 5/23/78 Storm Drainage Retenti6n/Detention Calculations 3 5/22/78 1 of I Storm Detention System Plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS QI For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit -copies for approval 0 For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit -copies for distribution [A As requested El Returned for corrections 0 Return -corrected prints Do For review and comment D 0 FOR BIDS DUE PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US If you have any questions, please contact our office. ."nNnS COPY TO SIGNED: FORM 240-2 - Avatlable from �� Townsend. Mass. 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Allan R. Mq�r�ga FILE DATE: MEMO TO: Building Division Community Development Department FROM: Engineering Division Public Works Department W A01 I; Z! Kf� M jl� After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following comment-s: (1) Coordination of the location of any structure with respec . t to utilities, streets, property lines and driveway grades is t resT6nsibility of the contractor. (2) The contractor is required to keep the -abutting streets clean- ed of dirt and debris caused by the construction. (3) A "Right -of -Way Construction Permit" is required, from the Engineering Division of Public Works, for any work within the Public Right -of -Way or public easement. _ (4) Driveway slope not to exceed 14%. Z WW'M MIN � A V x 111 M4 7' 3 11 INS" M-11WILPT-NA 1119*4 wool f4"'IF I LV'Tk_1 -;A tt__4 W3110wi;' at 07 1 PW 5/77 Ai 0 " ILE I May 9, 1978, M-EMO TO: John LaTourel.le, Director Community Development Department FROM: John B. Mitchell Acting Public Works Director SUBJECT: FIRST SERVE RACKET CLUB After review of the revised plan for the First Serve Racket Club prepared by Walter Eagle and Associates, we find that all corrections and rev isions-m-ade-are-now acceptable for the �igction covering.cross.connection abatement on plan pages,P 1, 3, 4 and san-itary- sewer---- resizing on page E I.. If there are any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Ken Kukuk. KKK: j ac W.Leadman Dt. lfmirf 51?�ec VIAWI 4 <It, � -78 ity- Engineer CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC- CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS April 12, 1978 Walter Eagle, A.I.A. 801 Welch Road Palo Alto, California 94302 Dear Mr,. Eagle: F, HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR After review of the plans for 'Ti , rst Serve" Racket-C-14' to be constructed at 242nd Street S.W. and 76th/Avenue West, the following items should be -included on -the revised plans. 1. Fire System: A detector check valve and alarm check valve are required on the fire sprinkler system. These must be installed to meet the City of.Edmonds Water Division and Fire Department requirements.. 2. Steam Generator: The cold water lines must be equipped with approved double check valve assemblies to eliminate back pressure into the potable drinking water system. 3. Irrigation System: The water line serving the irriga- tion system for landscaping must be equipped with a double check valve assembly. 4. Janitor Sink: P-7 must be equipped with an atmospheric vacuum breaker. 5. Whirlpool #1, 2 and 3: Water line supplying these whirl- pools must be equipped with either an approved air gap or approved reduced pressure backflow preventor. 6. All hose bibbs within the building must be equipped with atmospheric vacuum breakers Watts 8-A or equivalent. � 7. Whirlpool drain: This is to be in compliance with Uniform Plumbing Code and the City of Edmonds Code. Maximum drain line sizing for whirlpool discharge*would be 2" in diameter with approved air gap prior to the discharge into the sanitary sewer. 8. Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary sewer must be a minimum of 6" in diameter after leaving the building for discharge into the City of Edmonds sanitary sewer system. 1!! j � " 4"- 1 Z '_ 7-f Q62, '1.-1-2-72 W.Leadman Dt. Wlg Supt- Dt. Walter Eagle A. Page Two 'April 12, 1978 4 Please find enclosed the City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 1711, the most current list of backflow preventors approved by the Department of Social and Health Services and the City of Edmonds, and excerpts from the Accepted Procedures and Pr"actices-of the Cross Connection Control Manual for proper installation of back - flow preventors. All approved backflow preventors must be tested by City of Edmonds State Certified Water Division personnel prior to acceptance. If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact Ken Kukuk, Cross Connection Control Specialist for the City of Edmonds, 775-2525, extension 226.- KKK: j ac Enclosures CC: Rizzuto, Bold & Zahnow P.O. Box G, Edmonds Yours'very truly, LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works IHN Development Co., Inc. 3810 196th St.S.W., Lynnwood 1E May 9, 1978 !1EMO TO: John LaTourelle, Director Community Development Department FROM: John B. Mitchell Acting Public Works Director SUBJECT: FIRST SERVE RACKET CLUB After review of the revised plan for the First Serve Racket Club prepared by Walter Eagle and Associates, we find that all corrections and revisions made are now acceptable for the section covering cross connection - abatement on plan pages P 1, 3*, 4 and sanitary sewer resizing on page E 1. If there are any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Ken Kukuk. KKK: j ac 7W� �eadman Dt. irf Sec-.-/Dt;//' -7 Asst'. City Engineer— CITY OF EOM1711\10B CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHN LT(jYe81020 - (206) 775-2525 PTM DEPA �10_ 11 WC X April 12, 1978 Walter Eagle, A.I.A. 801 Welch Road Palo Alto, California 94302 Dear Mr. Eagle: HARVE H. HAPPISON MAYOR After review of the plansfor "First Serve" Racket Club to be constructed at 242nd Street S.W. and 76th Avenue West, the following items should be included on the revised plans. 11. Fire System: A detector check valve and alarm check valve are required on the fire sprinkler system. These must be installed to'meet the City of Edmonds Water Division and Fire Department.requirements. . 2. Steam Generator: The cold water lines must be equipped with approved double check valve assemblies to eliminate back pressure into the potable drinking water system. 3. Irrigation System: The water line serving the irriga- tion system for -landscaping must be equipped with a double check valve assembly. 4. Janitor -Sink: P-7 must be equipped with an atmospheric vacuum breaker. 5. Whirlpool #1, 2 and 3: Water line supplying these whirl- pools must be equipped with either an approved air gap or approved reduced pressure backflow preventor. *6. All hose bibbs within the building must be equipped with atmospheric vacuum breakers Watts 8-A or equivalent.. 7. Whirlpool drain: This is to be- in compliance- with Uniform Plumbing Code And the City of Edmonds Code. Maximum drain line sizing for whirlpool discharge*would be 2" in diameter with approved air gap prior to the discharge into the sanitary sewer. 8. Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary sewer must be a minimum of 6" in diameter after leaving the building for discharge into the City of Edmonds sanitary sewer system. W.'Leadman Dt. WI&V Supt. Dt. A Dt. 1.4alter Eagle', _Page Two April 12, 1978 Please find ' enclosed the City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 1711, the most current list of backflow preventors approved by the Department of Social and Health Services and the City of Edmo*nds, and excerpts from the Accepted Procedures and Practices of the Cross Connection Control Manual for proper installation of back - flow preventors. All approved backflow preventor ' s must.be tested by City of Edmonds State Certified Water Division personnel prior to acceptance. If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact Ken Kukuk, Cross Connection.Control Specialist for the City of Edmonds, 775-2525, extension 226. KKK: j ac Enclosures CC: Rizzuto, Bold & Zahnow P.O. Box G, Edmonds Yours very truly, LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works IHN Development Co., Inc. 3810 196th St.S.W., Lynnwood NARTMArAirdE CKLIST BUIdt'li7�'(3" PER1,1IT (address) (date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Street - Ri2ht-o;_ W-ay Existing_,_��� (I REQD n K)a Access Easerents Existing r4 ing Utility Easement Existi WD K_Iijk W Lot Per Subdivisiaj6j:���,,Plat Assessor Ma6j?4_ 'Site Plan Checked for Atcuracy. 41Z,(Al2 Z Underground Wiring Reqd.. Check Accuracy of Legal.Descripti Review by. "Date Existing Water Main Size. Water Main, Required - �J4C� Service Line Required 46' Hydrant Size Exist P4 Hydrant Reqd Per =e de, Co Size Detector Check Meter Reqd. _46 Cross Connection Inspection L�_,2_ WE 4�6_ 40 Fire Department Conments e Re Water Meter qd. 00 ol Review by 0 5V 0 0 At:: Date K.K. Septic Tank Design Approved Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd. Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Avai ili Proj Drawing No. File No.- Z-70 Side Sewer Availability. OW, Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee Reqd.,' :3: Revi.;� by Date Open Ditch Existing IV. _P� Culvert Reqd. Size C4 Catch Basin Reqd. 6,V -Indicate on Site Plan C 0 Shoulder drainage maintain collection an swale open runoff _g yz- F-1 ._c Manhole reqd. Indicate an Site Plan z, Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked ev C, Ie Review by Date /,I - 7 g� Revised: lvlO-1977 Page 2 Street Paving Reqd. er��: E-4 Curb and Gutter Reqd. -,440 AL Sidewalk Reqd. Curb Cut for Driveway Reqd Right -of -Way Construction Permit Reqd._ Bond Reqd. for -Public In*ovanehts Y_V!2�2 Street Name Sign Reqd. Other Sign3i_ng Reqd. Pre Permit Site Inspection made on'' 4-� 0 1.41-4 BY: SEWER P PL4 WATER STREEV H ENGINEERING Special Requirements listed in memo to Com=ity Developnmt Depart-nent, Building Divis*.oh BY Date o All item fill:ed in on. Building Permit Application I -PI 7/7 1:4 BY Date. - P" Dr awings Stanped and Notations Made P4 BY Date. Approved by Public Works Department \1 , - . I , I , - *�;. . . . . . ... . . . -0 Revised:,lv 10-1977 BUILDING' DEPARTMEW Applicant Fill USE T ZONE W.IER PERMIT APPLICATION Inside Heavy Lines NAME JOR NAME OF BUSINESS) JOB ADDRESS .� -Y A A � — -17-0 SUBDIVISION NO. PLAT NAME ASSTSOR MAP NO. WrAILING ADDRESS z P 00 0 70 VfTY ELEPHONE NUMBER PUBLIC RIGHT OF WA Y PER ORDINANCE NO. C4 C4,-4�� 1 '775-- 73-5- EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY NAME PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY �U­ A DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY W AOORES�S I.- STREET/UTILITY WORK REQUIRED YES NO 1 0 �6_ / U PERMIT FOR WORK IN PUBLIC R/W UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED VYES El NO OYES 1:1 No It CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER. zro CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQUIRED 11YES 1:1 NO DYES &NO 'NAME SEPTIC TANK PERMIT NO. 0 AdDREGS i5 SEE MEMO DATED CITY TELE PH ONE NUMBER REMARKS [ Z 0 7, 73 NA- U STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER CHE KED 4- V—D — & _z- 24 5- (?q t I I Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copies) METETr7 j 1BUILDING SUPPLYSIZE I it rNk Z 0 U 0 W a .J SIGN AREA SNV. REVIEW ADB NO. ALLOWED I PROPOSED I COMPL ETE I EXEMPT I REMARKS W .J VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW 13Y DATE YARDS FRONT SIDE REA RILOT COVERAGE NEW ADD ElALTER Fl REPAIR IR El . [_� F1 RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENT]IAL DEMOLISH EXCAVATE OR FILL PRE -MOVE INSP. rVGAS L929 LINE r�71 S I G N Ink] RETAINING WAL L FENCE X—FT) F;7/1 Sw I m L,L�,j P 0 0 L FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE 1175 HEIGHT SPECIAL INSPECTOR QUIRED YES 0 NO �REA OCCUPANCY GROUP Z3_a LJOAQ OCCUPAN PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. CITY TAX NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF REMARKS DWELLING 4 UNITS WNAT U RE OF WORK Yb BE DONE PR z 7— L m U In W 0 m 0 1 11DICATE BUILDING SETBACKS. ABUTTING STREETS) PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL FENCE SIGN RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL VALUATION FEE 3 71). CO- /_ M, 0�6 0 3: U m I I W z W (L W 0 z W 0 1 W W z 0 _1u ce WASHINGTON NATURAL*GAS COMPANY ;-V�6) 7'47-06`0 East, Belleville, Wasbingtiw 98007 LIEF LARSON- CITY ENGINEER 505 BELL STREET EDMONDS WA. 98020 ATTN: DICK ALLEN Gentlemen; Washington Natural Gas Company hereby applies for permission to; Install new Service At: 24228 76 Avenue W. .11/4" 1 ST 167-69,006 __LE73_and will require Construction is scheduled to begin Novemberia- approximately 30 daysto complete. If this work meets with your approval, please sign and return the original of this form. Date Applied November 17, 1978 W Z; &L;,LAN I A INGTON NATURAL AS COMPANY 00L V t Douglas V. Damm Distribut.ion.Engineer- TRAL GAS COMPANY is hereby authorized.to perform thd work WASHINGTON NATb .listed above in accordance with their franchise and subject to all applicable state, county, and/or municipal ordinances and specifications. ---------- Approval Date a . �<T\/ A( �f)�0Y|UC ^../ `� �.'.'///'.. PUD ORK3 D�P�RTH�/ [ F. ���� ' �^ \ )l L�@�n / UG|U�.=�^./C D|V|5)\]U � ` ` THIS yF8`|7T MUST||� �V�[ / �� 0 N w*O�~— ` ^� 8 . ^m*��L���=~Tl�� J0U S|T[ [o|< l:;Si`|.(ll-1:!;|'0S[3 - ` u,y1 ic^ut t" cvInyjcc� 1xrc53 A ,no x — A n. ^^^^'^t to be ^"s"e" `v ~^ For ''"^" at ``""'`,, or ./c^n/`%,/ lY|`c v[ Vurk Lo |., J.x,,� D ('rcLuc>` dcnving w}`n` ilM`|jco\`|r) ���-�_-------------------�'------' m / .( / xLc C icy zi he B. of Ole restor;Itioll b�,- Ole Furids he1d frori,che Sccur,iLy i)t,pc)SiL (estilwited rest or;, L i oil fee) ,:ill he ht2ld until processed for issimlice to tile applical)l:. N I ) IJ W., I, J� N., SIVEST FILE PLJ Ef�� L � C, !�P E C I ��L NNME-., Nt�:VUF�F- -CWTF�C)L NO.' EN�--,,TE� HEQUEST' 11VA- OORMa e,0Wf7;V- 4f -T I cD z,65" 0404v� QA r,5kE/v 310 Av 71 7r 000 'Ire OL, I D ��-T, E-:: : a4i554A4-Y 4/76- LErch 13, .1979 11EM0 TO: Art Housler, Director Finance Department FR OM: Leif R. Larson Director -of Public Works SUBJECT: BILLING FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSE STREET CUT SECURITY DEPOSIT - ORDINANCE #1935-- R/W CONSTR. PERMIT NO. : /,'78-303-- DATE ISSUED: 12 - 01 - 7 8 LOCATION OF WORK: 76th Ave. W. & 24.2nd .SECURITY DEPOSIT AMOUNT: $206,.00 - RECEIPT NO. & DATE: 4524 / 12-13-78 COMPLETION DT. OF REPAIR: 1-18-79 Please bill the below mentioned company for $412.75 to cover additional expenses incurred by the Street Division when accomp- lishing the subject work: Westgate Builders 6605 200th St. S.W. Lynnwobd, WA 98036 The total of the Security Deposit including this billing will be $ 618.75 to* be deposited to Street Division Revenue Fund 111-000-000-399.10,'under the above mentioned'R/lq Permit. lv -7 -I q S t-k-�e t Suft. Dt. inj Dt. CITY 01 ERI-IMIDS 10 PUBLIC 1,','ORKS DEPARTMEk' 1', ENG INEERING D IVI S ION APPLICATIN FnR T I GHT-HF-iffl- CNJ�Wl ICT I nj',j PFP,-'. I T THIS PERIMTT HUST BE AVAILA13'LE' . Al I FHE' J011 S"'F J:MZ iNSPECTIO' PURPOSFS A p 1) 1 i c a n t to Co in Ill o t e 11;i r C s A a Ild B Pe rmi. t to be iSSLie d t o 1: or Work at :(address or vic-illity) A - Type of 1-.ork Lo he (101W: (attach drawing When applicable) Tire Required Star.t: Finish: Owner: I Nilmo - Zq 2- �,Iai I in,- Address City State —Zi —P Telephone o'umber (T11 Contractor: D jut I L-L Na il i 11 g A d d r e S t a t e S F-- �JT—j� A — <�. -6 1 �- J-\ I A — State License INIumber :"o B, t:011K TO 1)1:(; 1,,: I'l, rol� r ci 1, 1' I"t I I r I Lll!dersL:ll)(1'; mid hv h" is SlimaLure Lo this n-pplicatit)ll, ,jj:'reeS L 0 ho I d t lie C i t y o F F-di;-'Olids ha rm I e S s f rom a lly i nj ti r:i (2 s , j ;es , - ',111 v or claims of kind or description wh�,Lsoe,,,er, foreseen Or Lill FO I-OSeUll, Liti(IL i:la�- 1) [71LI �j t the applAcant or the City of J-',jj-,jojlds, or -Illy f its (]cj)al-LmenCS' or e F-'. )10 I ric I ud, i ll�', 'Or no L mi t .2d to V'he defense of ally. 1,�j,aj 1) r 0 c. e. e (I . ings includi;ii; defense costs, court costs, alid attorney fees by reason of granting, this perinit. Upon issuance of this pu . rinit, tile contractor is responsible for workrmnship md mlLvrials for il j)12rj-0d Of 011e fol Jj)k..?jljg.0ie final inspe-etioll and aCCUDI-ance Of tile restor;.Itioll I-),; tile 1: n�,Lnuerjng Divi.sion. Funds held from the SOCLIrit)l Dej)'osit (e.st,inwited restoration fee) will be helci until Ole final street patch is completed, ;it which time a dehit or crediL.'will be I)'-Ocessed for issuance to tile applicant. Work is subject to iil,;pe(.-CiOjl and restoratioll in "Ic-cordilice with C'ftv Code. A 24-1101,11- - lioLiCe is require(I for inspe(:tjoll J)y j-'jlp C-1111 775-��525, ext. 220. 11ndL'r.SLAnd 01ZIt tlli.'; j)C!rn1jL VILISC he aVjjijjjj)j.0 at tj j 10 oh site for inspect,ioll purposus at al 1. t i vle'� Sigr /I Dn t e la til re. �';ell t (VIler or TO BE C0!-1P[J-jj.j) J�y I SS11 [NG A G E, C y 1) a t e I � s u e d .12- e. r in "'o e e Securi ty Bond J) -W4 + Time Author ized -�eAol 117 CA m b--tf.f C14-14 1 �—C4 , —/;o,- �5 -e_� ve lv�e < m Ife t I r;7r eolkly 0", ESS LICENSE APPLICATION LICENSE NO. CITY of EDMONDS Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 City Clerk Phone 775-2525 ANNUAL FEES F PENALTY AFTER FEB. 15 r�-rocm low=— 0 HOME OCCUPATION INSTRUCTIONS: CLASS I Y I e%E1A0tTL- JREASG. LIC. NO. SPEC.. $10.00 (A) ADDITIONAL $5.00 0 • All items must be completed �RESC KI SMALL BUSINESS or application will not be ac- EIPT 0. DATE PAID PRINT 'X' A_ $15.00 (B) ADDITIONAL $7.50 cepted. 11 _V1671 -7 e, I SPEC. BOX " E FOR ISSU OF 0 Business with 10 or • Sign and return application . �EE PAID' ',I PENALTY PAID' CORRECTED more employees ADDITIONAL $25.00 0 with fee. Renewals received , - I I I� LICENSE WITH 'LUACTION. $50.00 (C) after February 15 must pay 0 NEW APPLICATION (LA) penalty in addition to fee. 0 RENEWAL (LB) NEW BUSINESSES AFTER QCHANGE (LC) JULY 31, 1/2 FEE. (PLEASE MAKE ANY NECESSARY CHANGES) 0 DELETE (LD) NAME OF FIRM BUSINESS PHONE NO. OF EMPLOYEES First Serve Racquetball Club 775-0667 1 6 MAILING ADDRESS NATURE OF BUSINESS 24228 76th Ave. W operation of.racquetball club Edmonds, WA 98020 with amenities - ,/�U.��I'R_ESS ADDRESS INDIVIDUAL PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION 24228 1,6th Ave. �4 E,dmonds 8020 (S) (P) P OWNERS NAME HOME ADDRESS Famous Sports of Washingtong Inc., 300 Park Place Bldg.. Seattle 98101 HONtF, DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH 4-/ SOCIAL SEfURITY NUMBER 62, T-T& 2 1 ell i 0 EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: (1) NAME & TELEPHONE H o n a I d_U_o_I cl tD e r in,, 7b9-144*18 (PLEASE LIST TWO) (2) -NAME':& TELEPHONE Susan Fox . Y2_26 43, W. . R A � K WASHINGTON STATE TAX No. a121211ed. f or APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DO -NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE STAFF REVIEW: FILL IN LAND USE CODE, UFIR NUMBERS, ZONING, ETC. CHECK APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL, DATE, AND SIGN. IF DISAPPROVAL, PLEASE COMPLETE "COMMENT" SECTION. ROUTE TO NEXT DEPARTMENT ON LIST. PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE '-1 LAND USE CODE ZONING CODE' 0 APPROVE [D�DISAPPROVE SIGNATURE y CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE '1,-3' 7 Building 0 0 APPROVE DISAPPROVE Hotel/Motel (L) SIGNATURE Permit 0 f 1144HU1 0 Apt. Bldg. Office Bldg. (A) (0) Occupant; / El COMMENTS: A -JA GrouD y 0 Restaurant Hosp/Nurs Home (R) (H) CAPACITY: (NO. UNITS, APTS., OFFICES, SEATS, BEDS, STUDENTS) EJ School (S) FIR DEPARTMENT DATE M �ci U. F. 1. R. �IPROVE El DISAPPROVE SIGNATURE -A COMMENTS: El DISAPPROVE 7 X,,APOROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT SIGNATURE DATE COMMENTS: .��'PU LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE , DATE SIGNATURE COMMENTS: SIREET VILE CITY OF EDMON13S 2W DAYTON ST. -EDMONDS WASHINGTON 98020-(206) 7752525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS August 1, 1979 Mt. Ron Goldberg, President First Serve Racquet Courts 300 Park Place Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Dear Mr. Goldberg: SUBJECT: FIRST SERVE RACQUET CLUB 24228 76TH AVENUE ITEST. EDMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR The City of Edmonds has completed the asphalt overlay and restoration of 242nd Street SW. To date we have not received payment of the Fir.st Serve Racquet Courts share of the asphalt paving costs which is $1,304.61. if Saterlie 220. WJN: j ak you have any questions, please contact Jerry of the Engineering Division, 775-2525, extension, 131 GR IL I 1 0; 'z T dt. ' -,""Saterlie dt. Yours very truly, JLIAE. ADAMS, P.E. City Engineer n' df. P.W. Dir. Idt. - 141 , 00 Z-5- 'At" 11011- 1A 7/ ol " I flj"EDATE FILE # CITY OF fR�ON 1E SITE PLAN EDM_2DSjjfkFW BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATION�-- APPLICATION LANDSCAPE PLAN­x-,, to the ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Receipt # ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD SIGN EXHIBITS (3) PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: HEARING DATE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE Playtime Associates —PHONE 775-0667 ADDRESS 3810 19th S.W.; lynnwood, Wa. -ZIP CODE 98036 CONTACT PERSON'Mel Ewing - Westgate Builders, Inc. PHONE 774-7796 ADDRESS 66o5 200th S.W.; Lynnwood, Wa., ZIP CODE 98036 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Walter Eagle PHONE (415) 328-4789 PROPERTY ADDRESS 76th Ave W& 242nd St. S.W.; Edmonds, - Wa. ZONING — LEGAL DESCRIPTION (SEE ATTACHED) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: I. Building Plans — Preliminary _ Final 1� Site Plan Landscape Plan___ -,/_Elevations 2. Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan 3. Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK I (we) hereby certify to the best of my (our) knowledge, that the statements and information contained herein are, in all respects, true and correct. (Signature of Applicant 12/78 . I v FIRST SERVE RACQUETCOURTS Site Plan - Plant Legend -- Code Quantity G-1 S-11 12 .*--.S--2 IN-4 AY3�si 12 AM 31 S-6 12 Ua 9 7=2 4 Common Name Shore Juniper Armstrong Juniper Photinia Oregon Grape Compact Hea-venll—Bambo-0 Holly Calif. Wax,Myrtle Shore Pine Schwedler Norway Maple Site Plan - Color Legend Color A - Light Tan White Color B - Wood, Dark Stain Color C - Exposed Aggregate j v- 0,- nc, 0 Y7 Size Height 1 Gal. 1211 Gal. '24" Diameter Gal. 41 2 Gal. �411 6 " Gal. j6" 2 Gal. 12' Dense 51 2�Gal. 61 T�--13-' 10-12- 0 a STR FILE Maxine Berg, owner of property at 7215 156th S.W., listed the various supportive information that indicated there should be sewers, and she asked for a quick decision. No one else wished to speak, and the discussion was closed to the audience. Azn at_iZ City Attorney Wayne Tanaka was requested to determine what possible actions the i�x —,?-Council could consider to help those people who need financial help but do not qualify for the low income/elderly deferral. He was also asked to comment regarding the possibility of bringing Lynnwood into the matter. He responded that it is doubtful that residents of another city could be made to join an LID, but it may be possible with those in the County. He will research that question. A short recess was announced. /REPORT FROM ENGINEERING ON COST OF ESTABLISHING PATHWAY ON 88TH.,_FROM MAIN TO 204TH� City Engineer Jim Adams reported that the cost of a 5' wide asphalt walkway was estimated to be $7,400, plus a monthly rate of $30 to PUD if lighting is installed. He noted that there were no funds in the budget for this. Also, Mrs. Lyons, the lady who had fenced her yard and thereby blocked the path previously used, did not want the walkway near her home and was unwilling to provide an easement, and the owners of the private road were against the public using it for walking and had indicated they had a lot more peace and quiet since Mrs. Lyons' fence was installed. Mr. Adams noted that there is a future plat (Pine Ridge Estates) in the area in which a pathway could be required and also there is public right-of-way from 202nd to 204th which could be an alternate location for a path. The School District had asked that the City pursue the opening of a path, noting that busing of schoolchildren may be further curtailed next year. Mrs. Lyons said she finally has had some peace since installing the fence, and she recalled some of the incidents which had occurred beside her home prior to the installation of the fence --motorcycles, prowlers at night, vandalism by children, children drinking beer, littering of newspapers, etc. She said she had contacted the County Attorney who told her it was her property and she could fence it, and if she did not she would be liable for incidents which may happen on it, so she had fenced it and wanted it to remain that way. She favored the 88th St. pathway. Sue O'Hare, 2003 84th W., said others did not favor the 88th St. pathway as it would be too isolated because there are no homes close enough for people to watch it. She said an adult still would have to accompany the children. She indicated preference for the 84th St. pathway suggested as an alternate because there are homes along it. Councilman Naughten asked Mr. Adams to provide an estimate for a walkway on 84th instead of 88th, and Councilman Gould noted that there is $2,800 in the Sidewalk/Trail MOTION: Improvement Fund. COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GOULD, THAT A A REPORT BE PROVIDED FOR THE MARCH 31, 1981 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING 1981 SALARIES FOR EXEMPT PERSONNEL MOTION: COUNCILMAN NAUGHTEN MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 2201 AS PRESENTED, BUT WITH THE MAYOR'S SALARY REMAINING THE SAME AS IT CURRENTLY IS AT THIS TIME BECAUSE THAT ISSUE IS UNDER DISCUSSION. COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST SECONDED THE MOTION FOR DISCUSSION. Councilman Nordquist said he had sent the Council a memorandum regarding compensatory time, and he suggested that issue be discussed, reconsidering the 1977 Council action regarding compensatory time. Councilman Kasper said he would vote against the motion. He said this would amount to $49,628 for 22 people, plus benefits, and the average salary is around $22,000 with the average nonrepresented salary around $11,000. Councilwoman Goetz said department heads do run the City and should be paid for it. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS NAUGHTEN, NORDQUIST, GOETZ, AND GOULD VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS KASPER AND ALLEN VOTING NO. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION: COUNCILWOMAN GOETZ THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST, TO PLACE A DISCUSSION OF COMPENSATORY TIME ON THE MARCH 24, 1981 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. ORGANIZATION OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT MOTION: COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN GOETZ, TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM &.i5re441,,UNTIL NEXT WEEK WHEN THERE SHOULD BE A FULL COUNCIL PRESENT. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL Councilwoman Goetz noted that the Council had received copies of a letter of reprimand and said she would like to discuss it. She asked for a short Executive Session following this evening's meeting to do so. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - March 3, 1981 r-�_ I TRAFFIC ENGINEERINGe TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE 9 SUITE 100 * EVERETT� WA 98201 a PH: (425) 339-8266 * FAX: (425) 258-29221 May 10, 1999 Mr. Gordy Hyde City of Edmonds, Engineering Dept. 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 RECEIVE,) MAY 1; 0 1999 PERmrr COUNTER RE: Seattle Baptist Church in Edmonds; 24228 76th Avenue W; File No. CU-99-45 Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed Development; GTC Project No. 99-054 Dear Mr. Hyde: Gibson Traffic Consultants (GTC) has been retained by Seattle Baptist Church to conduct a traffic impact study to satisfy City of Edmonds requirements for the proposed church development. Per our scoping conversations with Jamal Mahmoud (former City Traffic Engineer), this traffic study contains the following elements: Sunday site peak level of service (LOS) analysis at critical intersections; traffic generation and distribution for the proposed development and access analysis. This technical memorandum summarizes the results of the requested traffic analysis and the impacts of the proposed residential development on the affected City street system during weekday p.m. peak -hour traffic conditions. BACKGROUND Proposed Site Development & Access The church operations for Seattle Baptist Church would relocate from the auditorium it currently rents at Snohomish County Christian High School (between 236th Street SW and 238th Street SW on 54th Avenue W in Mountlake Terrace) to 24228 76th Avenue W (previously occupied by World Gym). The proposed development would occupy and convert the existing 17,728 square -foot (SF) building for church operations. The proposed development would be fully operational by the year 2000. The church currently supplies 225 chairs (seats) for its 11:00 AM Sunday service, and averages an attendance of 175 people. Vanpooling and carpooling are common, with high occupancy rates in many vehicles. On Sunday, the church also has a 10:00 AM Sunday school and 7:00 PM service. The proposed location would offer 66 on -site parking spaces and 2,640 SF of sanctuary space, based on the ratio of 4 people/parking space and 40 SF of sanctuary/parking space. Therefore, COUNTS/SURVEYS - SITE IMPACTS - LOS ANALYSIS 9 EIS e HEARINGS e SAFETY * SIGNALS * PARKING Mr. Gordy Hyde May 10, 1999 Page 2 the maximum occupancy would be 264 people. The schedule of events on Sunday would include a 9:00 AM service (estimate an average 120 attendees), 10:00 AM Sunday school (estimate an average of 150 attendees) and 11:00 AM service (estimate an average of 120 attendees); there would no longer be an evening service. During the work week (Monday -Friday), there would be only one service; it would be on Wednesday evening at 7:00 PM, after the PM "commuter" peak (4:00-6:00 PM). The on -site staff would include 4 employees throughout the week (except Saturday, for which the site would be vacant. Site access would be provided via three (3) existing driveways. One driveway would have full access onto 242nd Street SW to the north. Another driveway would be an inbound only driveway from 76th Avenue W and the remaining driveway would be an exit only driveway onto 76th Avenue W. The driveways at 76th Avenue W would serve as the main entrance/exit to the site. Scoping & Methodology Per the March 19, 1999 comment letter from Karissa Kawarnoto (City of Edmonds Planner), various City/State intersections were selected for analysis. GTC subcontracted with Traffic Count Consultants (TC') to conduct Sunday turning movement counts at the study intersections. All of the traffic count data utilized for this study is less than one year old. To determine future baseline traffic volumes, a 2.5% annual traffic gTowth rate was applied to the existing volumes. This growth rate was determined from daily volumes recorded on SR-99 and SR-104 in the 1997 Annual Traffic Report, published by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Trips generated by the proposed development were determined using trip generation data as surveyed at the existing Seattle Baptist Church operations at the Snohomish County Christian High School on Sunday, April 25, 1999 and data found in the 6th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation report. The project's trip distribution has been determined from existing turning movement (TM) counts, origins and destinations of the existing church's attendees as well as an examination of the desirability of available travel routes. Project -generated trips have been assigned to the road system in order to identify impacts at the study intersections. Traffic congestion is generally measured in terms of level of service (LOS). Peak -hour LOS at critical off -site intersections and the access intersection was determined using the methodology described in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Transportation Research Board (TRB) Special Report 209. In accordance with the 1994 HCM, road facilities or intersections are rated between LOS A and F, with LOS A being free flow and LOS F being forced flow or over- aR'A"F',�Al.'CM M72 Mr. Gordy Hyde May 10, 1999 Page 3 capacity conditions (see Table 1). The LOS at intersections is measured in terms of average delay per vehicle in seconds. Geometric characteristics and conflicting traffic movements are taken into consideration when determining LOS values. For two-way stop -controlled unsignalized intersections, the LOS has been determined by the worst approach. For signalized intersections, the LOS is determined as an average delay for all entering vehicles. Peak -hour LOS analysis calculations for existing and future conditions were completed using Highway Capacity Software version 2. 1 g developed and maintained by McTrans (University of Florida, Transportation Research Center). Access locations were evaluated for sight distance. Sight distance evaluations at the site access driveway have been conducted per American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines. Terry Gibson, responsible for the traffic analysis and report, is a licensed professional engineer (Civil) in the State of Washington and past -President of the Washington State section of ITE. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Road Network The City street system in the vicinity of the project site is shown on Figure 1. Vehicular traffic generated by the church would access the project site via 76th Avenue W and 242nd Street SW. SR-99 is a north -south principal arterial connecting Edmonds north to Lynnwood and south to Shoreline. In the immediate site vicinity, SR-99 has 5 lanes and a 45-mph posted speed limit. In addition to the 5-lane section, right -turn lanes are also provided at 238th Street SW. SR-104/Edmonds Way is an east -west principal arterial connecting Edmonds west to Kitsap County (via the Washington State Ferry terminal) and southeast to King County. In the site vicinity, SR-104 has a 5-lane section with a 40-mph posted speed limit. 76th Avenue W is a north -south minor arterial (type I north of SR-99 and type 2 south of SR-99) with two travel lanes, on -street parking and sidewalks in the site vicinity. It has a 30-mph posted speed limit and connects the project site to SR-99, SR-104 and King County. 236th Street SW is an east -west local road with two travel lanes, variable shoulders and a 25- mph posted speed limit. 236th Street SW connects the site west to SR-99. 242nd Street SW is an east -west local road with two travel lanes, variable shoulders, intermittent sidewalks and a no posted speed limit. 242nd Street SW connects the site east to 76th Avenue W. aRANOF 010 Table I LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED, UNSIGNALIZED & ALL ­WAY STOP INTERSECTIONS Si2nalized Unsignalized & Level of Expected Stopped Delay All -Way Stop Service Delay Sec./Vehicle Stopped Delay Sec./Vehicle A Little/No Delay 5. 0 :!9 5. 0 B Short Delays 5.1 to 15.0 5.1-10.0 C Average Delays 15.1 to 25.0 10.1-20.0 D Long Delays 25.1 to 40.0 20.1-30.0 E Very Long Delays 40.1 to 60.0 30.1 -45.0 F > 60.0 > 45.0 When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. Source: 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. LOS A: free -flow traffic conditions, with minimal delay to stopped vehicles (no vehicle is delayed longer than one cycle at signalized intersection). LOS B: generally stable traffic flow conditions. LOS C: occasional back-ups may develop, but delay to vehicles is short term and still tolerable. LOS D: during short periods of the peak hour, delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial but are tolerable during times of less demand (i.e. vehicles delayed one cycle or less at signal). LOS E: intersections operate at or near capacity, with long queues developing on all approaches and long delays. LOS F: jammed conditions on all approaches with excessively long delays and vehicles unable to move at times. aRAFFI'C Mr. Gordy Hyde May 10, 1999 Page 4 Existing Intersection LOS The current City of Edmonds standards for LOS are as follows: LOS D for arterials, LOS C for collectors and LOS B for local roads. The arterial LOS standard is applicable to all of the study intersections. All of the off -site intersections included in the scope of this traffic study presently operate at acceptable or better LOS per their applicable LOS standard except SR-99 @ 236th Street SW. Note: The total intersection LOS for the SR-99/236th intersection is LOS A which does satisfy the City's LOS standard; however, LOS for the approach is often used in lieu of the total intersection LOS at unsignalized intersections. Potential improvements to this intersection are discussed under future conditions. The existing LOS and delays for all study intersections are summarized in Table 2. FUTURE CONDITIONS Future Road Network Funding has been secured for a traffic signal at the SR-99/236th Street SW intersection and installation of the signal should occur by the end of year 2000. Three (3) signal phases are planned for this installation (SR-99 NB and SB protected left -turn phase, SR-99 NB and SB through -right phase and a permissive EB/WB all movement phase). Due to the steep approach for VVB traffic, there would be the potential for accidents caused by EB left -turning vehicles failing to yield to WB through vehicles. Currently, this is not a problem because vehicles must stop at both approaches. To be conservative, GTC has assumed split phasing for the EB and VVB approaches to reduce/limit this accident potential. However, the posted speed is only 25 mph on 236th Street SW; therefore, it still may be acceptable to allow a single EB/WB permissive phase. This 4-phase plan would result in the worst LOS conditions for the improved intersection (2-phase would yield the best LOS); however, traffic safety may dictate its application and the LOS would still be very acceptable. Future 2000 without Project Trafflc Volumes As discussed earlier, to determine future baseline traffic volumes, a 2.5% annual traffic growth rate was applied to the existing volumes. The proposed church site would be fully operational by the year 2000. Trip Generation Sunday Peak Hour of the Generator: The peak impact from the church on the City's street system would occur on Sunday, for which the church's peak hour would occur in the morning or during the lunch hour. The existing church operations generated 64 trips (7 in, 57 out) for an attendance of 150 people during the peak hour of the generator on Sunday April 25th. The proposed church facilities would have a capacity of 264 seats. Therefore, the proposed church RR'A"F0F('1'0 OM�5 Table 2 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Year 1999 Intersection LOS Delay 1. SR-99 B 5.6 sec @ 76th Avenue W 2. SR-99 F 147.3 sec @ 236th Street SW 3. SR-104 B 14.4s . ec @ 76th Avenue W 4. 76th Avenue W B 5.2 sec @ 236th Street SW The total intersection delay is 4.4 seconds/vehicle, which represents LOS A. a RANOF 01CM L Me Mr. Gordy Hyde May 10, 1999 Page 5 could accommodate 76% more people (264/150) than the existing operations for the peak hour of the survey. Thus, conservatively applying a 76% increase to the surveyed traffic, the proposed church would generate 113 trips (12 in, 101 out) during the peak hour of the generator. Note: The ITE rate for land use code 560 (Church) would result in a greater trip generation during the peak hour of the generator, however, based on a qualitative assessment by GTC, it would not change the LOS or conclusions of this analysis. Additionally, ITE does not contain data correlating the number of available seats to a site's trip generation. Therefore, GTC has used local survey data for determining off -site impacts. Sunday Average Daily Trips (ADT): Using the ITE Sunday daily rate for church based on the building's size, and applying the ratio of local data to ITE data for the "peak hour of the generator," the proposed church would generate approximately 440 ADT on Sundays. Table 3 summarizes the Sunday trip generation results. Table 3 Average Sunday Trip Generation Summary Site Traffic Daily Trips Peak Hour Trips Generation (ADT) Total In Out 150 People Attending Not 64 7 57 During Survey Counted 264 Seats Available 440 113 12 101 at New Facility Weekday Traffic: The proposed church would only have one service during the week, it would be on Wednesdays at 7'PM (after the evening commute). Otherwise, site traffic would be minimal, attributable to 4 employees. Based on ITE rates for a 17,728 SF church, average IX' weekday traffic would consist of 165 ADT, of which 12 trips (6 in, 6 out) would occur during the p.m. peak hour. Note: This would be the "worst case" and only be representative of traffic operations on Wednesdays (on days other than Wednesday, the daily trip generation for the proposed facility would be much lower, and approximately 3 trips during the p.m. peak -hour). Trip Distribution & Assignment GTC used the following information to estimate the distribution of new site traffic for the proposed development: • Recent turning movement counts • Locations of origins and destinations of the Seattle Baptist Church's community • Desirability/mobility of different travel routes The regional trip distribution has been shown on Figure 1. Driveway assignments have been shown on turning movement diagrams in the Attachments. Based on GTC's discussion with aR'A"F2F('1'C" (OM, Mr. Gordy Hyde May 10, 1999 Page 6 Laurie Owens of Seattle Baptist Church, the attendance represents the following areas: Edmonds (10%), Lynnwood (20%), Bothell/Eastside (25%), Everett (25%) and Shoreline/Seattle/Lake Forest Park (20%). As shown on Figure 1, approximately 35% of the site traffic would be destined north on 76th Avenue W towards SR-99 and 2,:�Pth Street SW. The remaining 65% of the site traffic would be destined west on SR-104 south on 76th Avenue W/Meridian Avenue N (5%) and east on SR-104 ( ). SR-104 provides access to downtown Edmonds, Lake Forest Park/Mountlake Terrace, SR-99 and 1-5. 76th Avenue W provides access to SR-99 and SR-104. Future Intersection LOS Future (L3aseline) without PrQiLct With the future signal at the SR-99/236th Street intersection, the LOS would improve from LOS F to LOS B for year 2000. The other off -site study intersections would maintain the same acceptable LOS conditions as under existing conditions with minor increases in delay. The LOS ratings and estimated intersection delays for all of the study intersections are summarized in Table 4. Future with Proiect: None of the off -site study intersections would degrade from future without project LOS conditions and would continue to operate at acceptable peak LOS conditions. The proposed site driveways would operate at acceptable peak conditions per City LOS standards. The LOS ratings and intersection delays for all of the study intersections are summarized in Table 4. Sight Distance Analysis at Access Points Ci!y Standards: Entering sight distance (ESD) and stopping sight distance (SSD) were evaluated at the proposed. driveways. A design speed of 35 mph (30 mph posted speed plus a 5- mph modifier to estimate the 85th percentile speed) should be used for the sight distance evaluations on 76th Avenue W; thus, the minimum SSD required per AASHTO is 250 feet and the minimum ESD is 470 feet. A design speed of 30 mph (25 mph posted speed plus a 5-mph modifier to estimate the 85th percentile speed) should be used for the sight distance evaluations on 242nd Street SW; thus, the minimum SSD requirid per AASHTO is 200 feet and the minimum ESD is 375 feet. At all of the driveways, SSD does not need be adjusted for the nearly flat profiles on 242nd Street and 76th Avenue W. Proposed Access Driveways: The SSD line of sight would be clear for at least 250 feet at all of the proposed driveways. The ESD triangle would be clear for the site driveways for 470 feet or to the nearest controlled intersection. Thus, all of the proposed site driveways meet AASHTO standards for both SSD and ESD requirements. RR'A"AF('1'C" aHVIO Table 4 FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE Sunday Peak Hour of Generator FUTURE 2000 CONDITIONS' Without Project With Project Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay 1. SR-99 B 5.7 sec B 6.2 sec @ 76th Avenue W 2. SR-99 @ 236th Street SW B 5.5 sec B 5.6 sec (with signal) 1 3. SR-104 C 17.4 sec C 19.6 sec @ 76th Avenue W 4. 76th Avenue W B 5.2 sec B 5.6 sec @ 236th Street SW 5. 76th Avenue W .......... B 5.1 sec @ SW Driveway Includes a 2.5 percent annual growth factor to account for other planned/programmed development in the area. RR'A"AF('1'C" (OM, Mr. Gordy Hyde May 10, 1999 Page 7 MITIGATION Recommended Off -Site Improvements/Mitigation All of the study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS conditions during the critical PM peak period with or without the project for the horizon year of 2000. Therefore, specific off -site improvements would not be required of the proposed development. The City of AO Edmonds has a mitigation fee of $ per weekday p.m. peak hour trip generated b developments. This fee is based on tr1suptortation. improvement projects included in the City's 6- Year TIP. Thus, the Seattle Baptist Church project should pay the City of Edmonds a mitigation fee of $2,856 (12 new p.m. peak trips x $238/p.m. peak trip). Alternatively, as was calculated for the Edmonds United Methodist Church (see GTC traffic impact analysis), the City's fee of $58 per a.m. peak hour trip generated by developments applied to the 7-day average of 27 new AM peak trips (see Attachments) would result in a mitigation fee of $1,566. Recommended On-Site/Access Improvements The following on -site access and safety improvements are recommended to enhance the safety of vehicular traffic in the project vicinity: • Install standard stop signs and stop lines per MUTCD guidelines at the proposed access approaches to 76th Avenue and - 242nd Street to safely control traffic flow/movements from the project site. • Maintain clear sight triangles per AASHTO standards at the proposed access points to V/ ensure clear lines of sight for vehicles entering onto the major street. We trust that this memorandum letter and attachments adequately address the traffic impacts and mitigation issues for the proposed Seattle Baptist Church in Edmonds. If you have any questions on GTC's analysis or findings, please feel free to call me at (425) 339-8266. Thanks, Gordy. Sincerely, GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS9 INC. P.S. F-0,79pff'-w Carter A. Danne Transportation Planning Engineer Attachments XC: Laurie Owens, Seattle Baptist Church Jim Egge, James Egge & Associates L G Ri WW V_ W 6��Shl� a�114 Woe a 0200H RAFFIC (ol H Is U LVL% H V 0 New Trip Distribution Values (Raw values not corrected for rounding error.) SHEET. OF RAFFIC BY: cAD> DATE 5'-16- /,9)7 CHECKED DATE Jop PROJECT jp JOB NO. SUBJECT NPAY WK �ouK of- CE WATO 9 0A A /-9,9,9: �en 0/0 e (71,1 0 M e YVOLf x jA veal dt 6--11 6 e ZY - WO APF" �Ovvgver lo da�a ;p7d1,Qa.4e5 lower A 10 rf �/,e 1:11Y �d v eel _j Apz� 9 APT 'oe x 0 T, I -PA K A V,-rR&77-F- 01, hov t1i r J-F '72 -4 skukp#4 yreKPAY 14 M PgAK �J72t /-3 4 coo SF, -1-PA A Wk?�: 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE o SUITE 100 e EVERETT, WA 98201 * PH: (425) 339-8266 s FAX: (425) 258-2922 - q - 46a.jtel e.-Vt W 0/0 rip Generation Worksheet for Rate -Based Calculations N Project: Seattle Baptist Church in Edmonds Project Number: 99-054 Land Use: Church ITE TGM Code: 560 Analyst: BN Date: 4/21/99 Checked By: Date: Project Variable Variable Quantity Unit of Measure Source Project / Site 17.728 1000 sf Church Average Sunday Daily Trips Variable Quantity Unit of Measure Source ADT Trip Generation ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, Rate 36.63 Trips/ 1000 sf 6th edition Total ADK I j-,) ) 649.38 Gross ADT ADT Rate x Site Variable 1 1 Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Trips Variable Quantity Unit of Measure Source Sunday Peak Hour Trip 9.49 Trips/ 1000 sf ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, Generation Rate 6th edition Total Sunday Peak 168.24 Total Sunday Peak Sunday Peak Hour Rate x Site Variable Hour Trips Hour Trips Sunday Peak Trips 85.80 51% In ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, Inbound 6th edition Sunday P ak Trips 82.44 I 49% Out ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, Outbound I I 6th edition Average Weekday Daily Trips Variable Quantity Unit of Measure Source ADT Trip Generation Rate 9.11 Trips/ 1000 sf ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, 6th edition Total ADT 161.50 Gross ADT ADT Rate x Site Variable PM Peak Hour Trips Variable Quantity Unit of Measure Source PM Peak Hour Trip 0.66 Trips/ 1000 sf ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, Generation Rate 6th edition Total PM Peak 11.70 Total PM Peak PM Peak Hour Rate x Site Variable Hour Trips Hour Trips ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, PM Peak Trips Inbound 6.32 54% In 6th edition PM Peak Trips ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, Outbound 5.38 I 46% Out I I 6th edition X C SR-99 @ 76th Ave W Existing Volume Sunday, 4/25/99 From: 11:30 AM To: 12:30 PM 4G 1 777 0 1 666 1 0 0 0 *3 0 �3 lz� 157 76th Ave W 0 <P c* 157 C* 10 a 823 ID 11,6201 ill Ib SR-99 SR-99 0 1 0 11,5431 0 123 C) 0 123 c) 0 76th Ave W 234 lb C* ill 720 0 720 North I Future without Project 797 11,6611 864 Sunday Peak Hour of Generator 0 683 114 Year: 2000 4 Growth Rate = 2.5% 0 SR-99 126 Years of Growth = 1 4� 0 1:3 0 126 c3 Total Growth = 1.0250 Iz, 161 76th Ave W 76th 0 Ave W 240 North 161 F:O::: C* 114 161 SR-99 0 0 1 0 738 11,5821 738 Project Trip Assignments 4 3 1� 33 0 30 Sunday Peak Hour of Generator 3 1 0 11:1 61 SR-99 0 30 0 76th Ave W 76th Ave W 33 North 0 3 SR-99 0 0 0 ID Future with Project Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Year: 2000 +2.5% Annual Growth t? 0 161 76th Ave W 0 c* 161 r _0 C:- I rl 6-1 lb 4 4 la 800 11,6941 894 0 1 683 1 117 4 'ZI 63 SR-99 R� 156 C3 0 156 �3 C2 T 76th Ave W 273 North 117 SR-99 a 0 63 0 1 738 1 0 844 11,5821 738 IG 1D Page 1 of 1 SR-99 @ 236th St. SW Existing Volume Sunday, 4/25/1999 From: 11:30 AM To: 12:30 PM Future without Project Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Year: 2000 Growth Rate = 2.5% Years of Growth = 1 Total Growth = 1.0250 0 53 103 236th Street SW 28 50 5 17 zi 0 la 0 958 11,9161 958 21 1 929 1 8 0 -a 0 51 1:3 1:4 100 236th Street SW E 27 41 49 15 c* 17 z, SR 99 1:3 0 10 1:3 0 236th Street SW 37 27 SR 99 Cz. la 0 30 1 929 1 14 954 11,9271 973 982 11.9641 982 J 22 1 952 1 8 0 a SR 99 C3 0 10 C3 t2 236th Street SW 37 1�1 C:1 27 SR 99 0 0 1�1 1D <9 1 31 1 952 1 14 7 11,9741 997 ID ID Project Trip Assignments ID ia 0 0 0 Sunday Peak Hour of Generator SR 99 5 E5 5 t* 6 236th Street SW 236th Street SW 6 SR 99 0 8 la Future with Project Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Year: 2000 +2.5% Annual Growth 0 -:3 58 �3 9ZO <* 109 236th Street SW E 28 0 51 6 17 982 11,9641 22 1 952 1 8 0 0 lb 'Iq SR 99 "> E5 15 C3 0 236th Street SW 43 'ZI C* 28 c* SR 99 P4 la �p 31 1 952 1 14 977 11,9741 997 T North T North T North T North Page 1 of 1 SR-1 04 @ 76th Ave W Existing Volume Sunday, 4/25/1999 From: 11:30 AM To: 12:30 PM 0 4:3 1.544 43 4* 2,945 55 401 1 315 Future without Project Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Year: 2000 Growth Rate = 2.5% Years of Growth = 1 :o 1,583 Total Growth = 1.0250 c* 3,019 56 41 1,436rl—.34-8 -* Project Trip Assignments Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Future with Project Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Year: 2000 +2.5% Annual Growth r" 10 1:3 C* IF, ,:m 1,593 4* 3,030 57 41 1,437 1,348 * 1 32 <b 1 206 41.3 1 207 1 45 1 58 103 0 Ib 0 76th Ave W SR-104 EE SR-104 76th Ave W 0 9�1 f -66 71 11 170 1 4251 255 211 1 423 212 46 59 106 Ib 76th Ave W SR-104 F3-54-4� SR-104 76th Ave W 0 1 68 1 73 1 12 174 1 436 1 262 66 1 74 8 10 1 5 51 1 0 Ib lz� 76th Ave W SR-104 SR-104 76th Ave W la 0 5 6 277 497 220 56 157 0 <�J 76th Ave W SR-104 Ei� SR-104 76th Ave W (ZO 68 1 74 1 12 179 1 4421 263 a ID 1)' C,I r _Q4 Cm 1,595 :3 0 3,131 4* C* Z) r 8-3 rl—,469 1,635 3,210 R> ff 6 C3 57 C* 51 r-89— rl—.469 1,641 0 72-67 T North T North T North T North Page 1 of I 76th Ave W @ 236th St. SW Existing Volume 0 151 a 313 la 162 Sunday, 4125/99 15 1 133 1 3 1 From: 11:15AM To: 12:15 PM 0 12 a Ib 76th Ave W q 0 24 0 ff2 8 4* 236th Street SW F-35-2-1 236th Street SW 21 49 25 E 5 fl <b 76th Ave W C* 10 13 16 7 1� 156 153 1 321 1bU Future without Project 3 154 320 1D 166 Weekday PM Peak Hour 15 136 3 Year: 2000 Growth Rate = 2.5% 0 76th Ave W Years of Growth = 1 24 <-2 0 Total Growth = 1.0250 c* 236th Street SW F-3579 236th Street SW 21 49 C* 25 4 0 * 'ZI 13 P5 16 'b 76th Ave W Ib F-7776 7 la 5 160 328 172 Project Trip Assignments PM Peak Hour 3 33 30 3 Weekday 0 76th Ave W la 5 Iz. <-3 0 0 CM 6 236th Street SW 236th Street SW 0 0 76th Ave W 0 4 0 5 30 4 1 39 35 8 la Future with Project 157 ID 353 la 196 Weekday PM Peak Hour 15 139 3 J Year: 2000 +2.5% Annual Growth 0 t2 4 <b 76th Ave W 29 4r.3 0 �2 55 236th Street SW F 398 236th Street SW 21 c* 26 0 IZI C:> 13 c* � �4 1 7 76th Ave W IT 160 1 367 1 207 4 ID q T North T North T North T North Page 1 of 1 EW Driveway @ 76th Ave W Existing Volumes (Projected) a 8 la 206 413 207 Sunday, 4/25/1999 2061 From: 11:30 AM 0 To: 12:30 PM 1:3 0 0 76th Avenue W 9;4 0 E-W Driveway <9 0 <b 76th Avenue W 206 413 207 Future without Project Sunday Peak Hour of Generator 211 423 212 0 1 211 J Year: 2000 0 la Growth Rate = 2.5% 0 0 76th Avenue W Years of Growth = 1 9�1 Total Growth = 1.0250 0 E-W Driveway F423 0 <P 0 0 <Z1 76th Avenue W VS la E= F- 211 423 212 Project Trips Sunday Peak Hour of Generator 4 39 357 1 4 1 0 J a c-3 12 0 76th Avenue W 4:* 113 E-W Driveway F1 137 3 5 101 66 <�s 76th Avenue W 66 74 4 Future with Project 4 la Sunday Peak Hour of Generator 215 462 247 4 1 211 1 a 0 c3 12 t? 76th Avenue W 113 E-W Driveway F 536� 35 0 c* 101 66 zi 76th Avenue W a la 277 497 220 8 la T North T North I T North I T North I Page 1 of 1 H`CS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 9976E.HC0 Page 1 ======================================================================= Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ======================================================================= Streets: (N-S) SR-99 (E-W) 76TH AVE W Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time AnaIyzed... 15 (min) Analyst.................~. BN Date of Analysis.......... 4/27/99 Other Information ......... EXISTING SUNDAY 4/25/99 11:30AM-12:30PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ======================================================================= | Northbound | Southbound Eastbound / Westbound |L T R |L T R L T R |L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield | N; Y| | Volumes 111 666 0| 157� 123 PHF | .82 | .82 .82 82| .82 Grade | -2 MC's SU/RV's CV's (%) | | 1 | 0| Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-uo Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (�f) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.O0 3.40 ° ^ . . ' HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 9976E.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 439 406 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 830 862 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 830 862 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.77 0.80 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 878 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 579 Movement Capacity: (pcph> 579 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.74 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue ApProach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph>(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh} 5.2 EB R 172 862 5.2 0.8 B 5.6 WB R 188 830 5.6 1.0 B SB L 150 579 8.4 1.1 B 1.2 Intersection Delay = 1.4 sec/veh ° ^ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 99236E.HC0 Page 1 ======================================================================= Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ======================================================================= Streets: (N-S) SR-99 (E-W) 236TH ST SW Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... BN Date of Analysis.......... 4/27/99 Other Information ....... ..EXISTING GUNDAY 4/25/99 11:30AM-12:30PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ======================================================================= | Northbound | Southbound | Eastbound Westbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R . . . . No. Lanes | 1 2 < 0 | 1 2 < 0 | ON > 1 < 0 | 0 > 1 < 0 Stop/Yield Y| Y| | Volumes | 30 929 14| 8 929 21| 27 5 171 8 0 2 PHF | .88 .88 .881 .88 .88 Be;..88 .88 .88/ .88 Grade | -2 MC's (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 0 0| 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%)| 0 | 0 | 0 0 0| 0 0 0 CV's (%) | 1 | 1 | 2 PCE's |1.22 �0.81 0.81 0.81|�.40 ` Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-:p Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 ` HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g ======================================================================= 99236E.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB ' EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 528 528 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 748 748 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 748 748 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1056 1056 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 465 465 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 465 465 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 0.93 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2155 2155 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 60 60 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.91 0.91 Movement Capacity: (pcph} 55 55 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.91 ---- _______________________________________________ Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2158 2155 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 44 44 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.83 0.91 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.87 0.93 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.85 0.93 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 37 41 Flow Rate Movement (pcPh) EB L 25 EB T 5 EB R 15 Intersection Performance Summary � Avg. 95% Move Shared TotaI Queue Cap Cap Delay Length L (pcph) (p(--ph)(sec/veh) (veh> 41 > 55 > 62 147.3 2.4 748 > WB L 13 37 > WB T 0 55 > 45 WB R 3 748 > NB L 31 465 SB L 11 465 LOS ApProach Delay (sec/veh) 147.3 118.9 0.9 F 118.9 8.3 0.1 B O.3 7.9 0.0 B 0.1 Intersection Delay = 4.4 sec/veh 'CM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 04-27-1999 ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SR-104 (N-S) 76TH AVE W Analyst: BN File Name: 10476E.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-27-99 SUNDAY Comment: EXISTING SUNDAY 4/25/99 11:30AM-12:3OPM ======================================================================= � Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T R L T R No. Lanes | 1 2 1 / 1 2 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 Volumes | 55 1315 3181 1433 81| 66 71 118� 103 58 45 PHF or PK15|0.83 0.83 0.83|0.83 0.83 0.83|0.83 0.83 0.83|0.83 0.83 0.83 Lane W (ft)�12.0 12.0 12.0|12.0 12.0 12.0/12.0 12.0 12.0|12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade -6 | 6 % Heavy Veh; 0 0 0| 0 Parking |N N !N N |N N |N N Bus Stops Con. Peds 01; 0| 0| 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) Y 14.5 s|(Y/N) Y 14.5 s|(Y/N) Y 20.5 s|(Y/N) Y 20.5 Arr Type | 3 3 3| 3 3 3� 3 3 311 RTOR Vols | 91 24| 35� 14 Lost Time |3.00 3.00 3.0013.003.00�3.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.0� Prop. Share' Prop. Prot. 12| | Signal Operations Phase Combination J. 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * |NB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds * | Peds WE' Left * |SB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right � Peds * | Peds NB Right * |EB Right * SB Right * |WB Right * Green 9.0A 75.0A |Green 10.0A 10,0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 |Ye1low/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 Intersection Per+ormance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C A�proach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay L�� Ell?L 153 1832 0.432 0.083 35.0 D 10.6 � T 2443 3857 0,681 0.633 9.7 B R 1229 1639 0.021 0.750 2.5 A WB L 148 1778 0.661 0.083 41.5 E 12.4 B T 2371 3743 0.765 0.633 11.2 B R 1193 1591 0.058 0.750 2.5 A NB L 169 1841 0.474 0.092 35.0 D 31.9 D T 178 1938 0.484 0.092 35.1 D R 329 1647 0.304 0.200 26.6 D SB L 159 1734 0.780 0.092 48.8 E 40.7 �7 T 167 1825 0.418 0.092 34.3 D R 310 1551 0.119 0.200 25.4 D Intersection Delay = 14.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.728 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236E.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ======================================================================= Streets: (N-S) 76TH AVE W (E-W) 236TH ST SW Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... BN Date of Analysis.......... 4/27/99 Other Information ......... EXISTING SUNDAY 4/25/99 11:30AM-12:30PM Two-way Stop —controlled Intersection ======================================================================= | Northbound | Southbound | Eastbound Westbound �L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R '---- ---- -------- ---- ----|---- ---- ----|---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 2 < 0 | 0 > 1 < 0 | 0 > 1 < 0 | 0 > 1 < 0 Stop/Yield | N/ . N| � Volumes | 7 156 51 3 133 15: 4 5 17; 4 2 2 PHF | .86 .86 .86| .86 .86 .861 .86 .86 .86| .86 .86 .86 Grade | 2 | O | O | 3 MC's (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 0 0| 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%)| 0 | 0 | 0 0 0| 0 0 0 CV's (%) | 0 | 1 | 0 0 0| 13 13 13 PCE's |1.20 |1.01 11.00 1.00 1.00|1.72 1.72 1.72 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle CritIcal Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf> Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236E.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 94 164 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1241 1143 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1241 1143 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 187 172 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1396 1419 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1396 1419 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 --------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 367 362 ' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 700 704 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 693 697 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB ------------------------------------------ 0 -------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 372 356 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 645 659 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 625 650 � now HCS: ======================================================================= Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236E.HC0 Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------ ------- (veh) -------- ----- (sec/veh) ---------- --------- EB L ------ 5 650 > ES T 6 697 > 917 4.1 0.0 A 4.1 ` EB R 20 1143 > WB L 9 625 > WB T 3 693 > 709 5.2 0.0 B 5.2 WB R 3 1241 > NB L 10 1419 2.6 0.0 A 0.1 SB L 3 1396 2.6 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh ° ,, ' ^ `S: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 9976F.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) SR-99 (E-W) 76TH AVE W Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... BN Date of Analysis.......... 4/27/99 Other Information ......... FUTURE 2000 WITHOUT PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ======================================================================= | Northbound | Southbound | Eastbound | Westbound |L T R |L T R |L T R L T R �____ ____ ~___|____ ____ ____|____ ____ ____|____ ____ No. Lanes | 0 2 0 | 1 2 < 0 | 0 0 1 ! 0 0 1 Stop/Yield | N| Y| � Volumes | 738 | 114 683 0| 161| 126 PHF | .82 | .82 .82 .82| .82| .82 Grade -2 | 1 | -2 1 MC's (%) | | 0 | 0| SU/RV's (%>: | 0 | 0| CV's (%) 1 | 0| PCE's K.11 | 0.90 1.25 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2,60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 ° . . ^ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 9976F.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWGC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 450 416 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 819 852 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 819 852 Prob. of -------------------------------------------------------- Queue -Free State: 0.77 0.79 Step 2: LT from Major Street ________________________________________________________ SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 900 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 564 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 564 Prob. of ________________________________________________________ Queue -Free State: 0.73 ^ Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 5.3 EB R 176 852 5.3 0.9 B 5.7 WB R 192 819 5.7 1.0 B SB L 155 564 8.8 1.2 B 1.3 ` HEM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 04-27-1999 ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) 236TH ST SW (N-8) SR-99 Analyst: BN File Name: 99236F.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-26-99 GUNDAY Comment: FUTURE 2000 ======================================================================= WITHOUT PROJECT | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Gouthbound |L T R |L T R |L T R L T R .____ ____ ' ____---- ____ ____---- ____ ____.__ . ' . __ ____ ----- No. Lanes | 0 > 1 < 0 | O > 1 < 0 | 1 2 < 0 | 1 2 < 0 Volumes | 8 1 2| 28 5 17| 31 952 14| 8 952 22 PHF or PK15!0.98 0.98 0.9810.98 0.98 0.98;0.98 0.98 0.98|0.98 0.98 0.98 Lane W (ft)| 16.0 | 12.0 |12.0 12.0 |12.0 12.0 Grade | -4 6 | -2 | 2 % Heavy Veh| 0 0 0| 0 0 0| 1 1 1 1 Parking ;N N |N N |N N |N N Bus Stops | 0| 0: 011 0 Can. Peds | 011 011 011 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) Y 17.5 s|(Y/N) Y 17~5 s|(Y/N) Y 9,5 s|(Y/N) Y 9.0 Arr Type | 3 | 3 | 3 3 | 3 3 RTOR Vols | 1| 1| 2| 3 Lost Time |3.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.00/3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; Prop. Prot"| Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow/AR Cycle Length: ------------- EB WB NB SB Lan a Mvmts LTR LTR L TR TR Signal Operations 1 2 3 4| 5 6 * !NB Left * * | Thru � * | Right * * ( Peds * * |SB Left * * | Thru * * | Right * * | Peds * |EB Right :WB Right 4.0A 10.0A |Green 4.0A 86.0A 4.0 4.0 !Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ---------------------------- 0 ---------------------------- Group: Cap Intersection Performance Adj Sat x/c g/C Flow Ratio Ratio _______ _____ 78 1872 141 1535 75 1805 2750 3793 74 1769 2693 3714 Intersection Lost Time/Cycle. L = 12.0 Summary Apprcach: Delay LOS Delay LCS _____ ___ _____ 0.128 0.042 35.8 D 35.8 D 0.355 0.092 33,7 D 33.7 C 0.425 0.042 38.6 D 5.1 B 0.375 0.725 4.1 A 0.109 0.042 35.8 D 4.4 A 0.386 0.725 4.1 A Delay = 5.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B sec Critical v/c(x) =: 0.373 -' ' HOM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 04_27-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) SR-104 (N-S) 76TH AVE W Analyst: BN File Name: 10476F.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-27-99 SUNDAY Comment: FUTURE 2000 WITHOUT PROJECT ======================================================================= | Eastbound Westbound | Northbound | Southbound �L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R .____ ____ ____---- ____ ____---- ____ ____.____ . . . . No. Lanes | 1 2 1 | 1 2 1 | 1 1 1 Volumes | 56 1348 32: 63 1469 83| 68 73 121| 106 59 46 PHF or PK15�0.83 0.83 0.83|0.83 0.83 0.83|0.83 0.83 0.83110.83 0.83 0.83 Lane W (ft)|12.0 12.0 12.0|12.0 12.0 12.0|12"0 12.0 12.0|12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade -6 | 6 % Heavy Veh| 0 0 0| 0 0 0| 1 1 1| 1 1 1 Parking �N N IN N IN N |N N Bus Stops 011 0: 011 0 Con. Peds | 011 011 0| 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) Y 14.5 s!(Y/N) Y 14.5 s|(Y/N) Y 20"5 s:(Y/N) Y 20,5 Arr Type 3 3 31, 3 3 3| 3 3 31, 3 3 3 RTOR Vols | 9| 24| 35| 14 Lost Time <3.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3~00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.00 ' . . Prop. Share.. . . . Prop. Prot.| 12| 12| | Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * :NB Left * Thru Thru * Right Right * Peds * | Peds WB Left * |SB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds * | Peds NB Right * :ES Right * SB Right * |WB Right * Green 8.0A 69.0A !Green 12.()A 15.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 :Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination �order.- #1 #2 #5 #6 ------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: A d j Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ EB L ____ 137 _______ 1832 _____ 0.488 0.075 36.6 D 13.9 B T 2250 3857 0.758 0.583 13.1 B R 1175 1639 0.024 0.717 3.2 A WB L 133 1778 0.750 0.075 48.8 E 17.0 C T 2183 3743 0.851 0.583 15.8 C R 1140 1591 0.062 0.717 3.3 A NB L 199 1841 0.411 0.108 33.1 D 29.1 D T 258 1938 0"341 0.133 30.8 D R 384 1647 0.271 0.233 24.4 C SB L 188 1734 0.682 0.108 39.8 D 34.4 D T 243 1825 0.292 0.133 30.5 D R 362 1551 0.105 0.233 23.4 C Intersection Delay = 17.4 sec/veah Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L _______~___________ = 12,0 sec Critical v/c(m) = ~______ _____~--_____________ ` 0.747 ` HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236F.HCO Paae A! Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) 76TH AVE W (E-W) 236TH ST SW Major Street Direction .... NS Length of Time Analyzed ... 15 (min) Analyst ................... BN Date of Analysis .. ....... 4/27/99 Other Information ......... FUTURE 2000 WITHOUT PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound South L T R L 11 No. Lanes 0 > 2 < 0 1 0 > I Stop/Yield N; Volumes 7 160 5: 3 1 PHF .86 .86 .86: .86 Grade 2 MC's o C'� SU/RV's M! C) 0 CV's (%) 0 1. PCE's !1.20 4.01 ---------------------------------- bound Eastbound Wes t bowr. d R L -r R L T R < 0 1 0 > I < 0 0 > 1 < 14: 36 15: 4 5 16: 4 2 2 86 .86: .86 .86 .86; .86 .96 .36 0 :71 0 0 0� 0 .J C.) 0 C) 0i o 0 , o 0 Q 1 13 13 17, :1.00 --------------------------------------- 1.00 1.0011n72 1.72 1.72 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tq) Time KK� --------------------------------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.0"') 2 . I c.), Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.6C; Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236F.HC0 Page 2 ======================================================================= Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street ________________________________________________________ WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 96 166 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1238 1141 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1238 1141 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ________________________________________________________ 1.00 0.98 Gtep 2: LT from Major Street ________________________________________________________ SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 192 175 ' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1389 1415 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1389 1415 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate; (pcphpl) 1700 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Of Queue -Free State: ---------------------------------------------- 1.00 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 375 370 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 693 698 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 686 691 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ________________________________________________________ 1.00 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 379 364 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 639 652 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 619 643 '' ' ^ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236F.HC0 Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) ______ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ______ ______ _______ _______ (veh) _____ (sec/veh) _________ EB L 5 643 > EB T 6 691 > 906 ' 4.1 0.0 A 4.1 EB R 19 1141 > WB L 9 619 > WB T 3 686 > 703 5.2 0.0 B 5.2 WB R 3 1238> NB L 10 1415 2.6 0.0 A 0.1 GB L 3 1389 2.6 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh ° ^ QS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 9976W.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) SR-99 (E-W) 76TH AVE W Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... BN Date of Analysis.......... 4/27/99 Other Information ......... FUTURE 2000 WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection | Northbound | Southbound | Eastbound | Westbound |L T R |L T R |L T FT |L T R '____ ____ ____.____ ____ ____.____ ___ ____.____ . . . . No. Lanes | 0 2 0 | 1 2 < 0 | 0 0 1 | 0 0 1 Stop/Yield | N| Y| | Volumes | 73S 117 683 A| 161| 156 PHF | "82 | .82 .82 .82� .82| .82 Grade | -2 | 1 -2 | 1 MC's (%) | | 0 | 0| SU/RV's (%>| 0 | 0: CV's (%) 1 | O| PCE's | 11.11 0.90! 1.25 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (t& __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5"50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 . . HCS: Unsigna1ized Intersections Release 2.1g 9976W.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWGC Intersection --------~-----------------------------------------------Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 450 416 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 819 852 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 819 852 Prob. of -------------------------------------------------------- Queue -Free State: 0.71 0.79 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 900 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 564 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 564 Prob. of ________________________________________________________ Queue -Free State: 0.72 ` Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB R 176 852 5.3 0.9 B 5.3 6.2 WB R 238 819 6.2 1.3 B SB L 159 564 8.9 1.3 B 1.3 Intersection Delay = 1.5 sec/veh ^ ^ ^M: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4o 04-27-1999 ` ^ Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) 236TH GT SW (N-S) BR-99 Analyst: BN File Name: 99236W.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-26-99 SUNDAY Comment: FUTURE 2000 WITH PROJECT ======================================================================= | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Sputhbound |L T R !L T R |L T R |L T R .____ ____ ____---- ____ ____---- ____ ____.____ ____ ____ ' ' ' ' No. Lanes | 0 > 1 < 0 | 0 > 1 < 0 | 1 2 < 0 | 1 2 < 0 Volumes | 8 5 2| 28 6 17| 31 952 14| 8 952 22 PHF or PK1510.98 0.98 0.98|0.98 0.98 0.98|0.98 0.98 0.900.98 0.98 0.98 Lane W (ft)| 16.0 | 12.0 (12.0 12"0 112.0 12.0 Grade | -4 6 | -2 | 2 % Heavy Veh| 0 0 0| 0 0 0| 1 1 1| 1 1 1 Parking ;N N |N N |N Al |N N Bus Stops | 0: 0| 0| 0 Con. Peds | 0| 011 0| O Ped Button :(Y/N) Y 17.5 s|(Y/N) Y 17.5 s|(Y/N) Y 9.5 s|(Y/N) Y 9.0 Arr Type | 3 3 | 3 3 | 3 3 RTOR Vols | 1| 1| 2| 3 Lost Time 13.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.000.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share| Prop. Prot.| | | | Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * |NB Left * Thru Thru * Right * | Right * Peds * | Peds * WB Left * ;SB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds * | Peds * NB Right |EB Right SB Right |WB Right Green 4.0A 10.0A ;Green 4.0A 86.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 |YelIow/AR 4.0 4.1:) Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ------------------------------------------ =-------------------------`-- EB WB NB SB Lane Mvmts LTR LTR TR L TR Group: Cap Intersection Performance Adj Sat v/c g/C Flow Ratio Ratio _______ _____ ----- 79 1901 141 1537 75 1805 2750 3793 74 1769 2693 3714 Intersection Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 ___________________________ Summary Approac& Delay LOS Delay LOS _____ ___ _____ 0.177 0.042 36.0 D 36.0 D 0"362 0.092 33.8 D 33.8 D 0.425 0,042 38.6 D 5.1 B 0.375 0.725 4.1 A 0.109 0.042 35.8 D 4.4 � 0.386 0.725 4.1 A Delay = 5.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B sec Critical v/c(x) ____________________________________________ = 0.376 ' ` ` HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 04-27-1999 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SR-104 (M-S) 76TH AVE W Analyst: BN File Name: 10476W^HC9 Area Type: Other 4-27-99 SUNDAY Comment: FUTURE 2000 WITH PROJECT ======================================================================= | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound |L T R L T R |L T R |L T R .____ ____ ____---- ____ ____---- ____ ____.____ ____ ____ . . . . No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 Volumes 1 57 1348 32| 83 1469 89| 68 74 121| 157 64 56 PHF or PK15|0.83 0.83 0.83|0.83 0.83 0.83|0.83 0.83 0.870.83 0.83 0.83 Lane W (ft)|12.0 12.0 12.0|12.0 12.0 12.0|12.0 12.0 12"0|12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade | -3 3 | -6 | 6 % Heavy Veh| 0 0 0| 0 0 O| 1 1 1| 1 1 1 Parking |N N |N N |N N |N N Bus Stops | 011 0: 0| 0 Con. Peds | 011 0| 0| 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) Y 14.5 s|(Y/N) Y 14.5 s|(Y/N) Y 20.5 s:(Y/N) Y 20.5 Arr Type | 3 3 3| 3 3 3! 3 3 3| 3 3 3 RTOR Vols | 91, 24| 351 14 Lost Time |3.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.00|3.00 3.00 3.007.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share| | | | Prop. Prot.; 12: 12; | _______________________________________________________________________ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 ES Left * :NB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds * | Peds WB Left * ;SB Left * Thru * ( Thru * . Right * | Right * Peds * | Peds NB Right * |EB Right * SB Right * :WB Right * Green 7.0A 67.0A :Green 15.0A 15.0A Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 !Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination brder: #1 02 45 #6 _______________________________________________________________________ Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LJS EB _____ L ____ 122 _______ 1832 _____ 0.565 _____ 0.067 39.4 D 15.2 C T 2186 3857 0.780 0.567 14.4 B R 1188 1639 0.024 0.725 3.0 A WB L 119 1778 0.844 0.067 62.3 F 19.3 C T 2121 3743 0.876 0.567 17.7 C R 1153 1591 0.068 0.725 3.1 A NB L 245 1841 0.334 0.133 30.8 D 28.6 'C� T 258 1938 0.344 0.133 30.8 D R 371 1647 0.281 0.225 25.0 C SB L 231 1734 0.818 0.133 46.3 E 38.9 D T 243 1825 0.316 0.133 30.7 D R 349 1551 0~143 0.225 24.1 C Intersection Delay = 19.6 sec/voah Intersection LOS = C Lost ----------------------- Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical ` - ~ --------------------------------------------- v/c(x) = 0.786 ' HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236W.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ======================================================================= Streets: (N-S) 76TH AVE W (E-W) 236TH ST SW Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst......"."........". BN Date of Analysis.......... 4/27/99 Other Information ......... FUTURE 2000 WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ======================================================================= / Northbound | Southbound | Eastbound | Westbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R .____ ____ ____---- ____ ____---- ____ ____.____ ____ ____ ' ' ' ' No. Lanes | 0 > 2 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 | 0 > 1 < 0 | 0 > 1 < 0 Stop/Yield | N| N; | Volumes | 12 190 5: 3 139 15| 4 5 171 4 2 � PHF | .86 .86 .86: "86 .86 .86| "86 .86 .861 .86 .66 BE Grade 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 MC's (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 0 0| 0 0 O SU/RV's (%): 0 | 0 ^ � 0 0 0| 0 0 0 CV's (%> 1 1 | 0 O 0| 13 13 1Zo* PCE's |1.20 |1.01 |1.00 1.00 1.00|1.72 1.72 1.72 _______________________________________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236W.HC0 Page 2 ======================================================================= Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 114 170 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1212 1136 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1212 1136 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.98 --------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 227 179 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1336 1409 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1336 1409 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 420 414 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 657 662 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 647 652 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 --------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB E8 ------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 424 410 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 602 613 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 580 602 ' ~ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76236W.HC0 Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ______ _______ (veh) _______ _____ (sec/veh) _________ ________ EB L ______ 5 ______ 602 > EB T 6 652 > 883 4.2 0.0 A 4.2 EB R 20 1136 > WB L 9 580 > WB T 3 647 > 663 5.6 0.0 B 5.6 WB R 3 1212 > NB L 17 1409 2.6 0.0 A 0.1 SB L 3 1336 2.7 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh " HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 76DRIW.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611_2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) 76TH AVENUE W (E-W) DRIVEWAY Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... BN Date of Analysis.......... 4/27/99 Other Information ......... FUTURE 2000 WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ======================================================================= ' Northbound ' Southbound | Eastbound . . | Westbound �L T R |L T R L T R |L T R '____ ____ ____`____ ____ ____---- ____ . . ` ____.____ ____ . No. Lanes 0 > 1 0 | 0 1 < 0 | 0 > 0 < 0 | 0 0 0 Stop/Yield | N} N| � Volumes | 8 212 | 211 4| 35 66! PHF | .95 .95 | .95 .95| .95 .95| Grade | 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%Y CV's (%) PCE's |1.10 | |1.10 _______________________________________________________________________ 1.10| Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-uQ Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 - .� HOS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2~1g 76DRIW"HC0 Page 2 N Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 224 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1066 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1066 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.93 ---------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB ________________________________________________________ NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 226 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1338 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1338 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vPh) 455 p"+="+j�� r�n�ri+v: (ncoh) 577 .^ .-,-_--,' -, �. Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 573 ________________________________________________________ Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) ------------ -------- EB L ------ 41 573 > 819 5.1 0.5 B 5.1 EB R 76 1066 > NB L 9 1338 2.7 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - KATHY PAGE 02 T C2 7_ ff C COVfft COITSUAWtS, 117C. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinvil1e, WA 98072 1 Fhone: (425) 8614MM FAX. (425) 861-8877 Turning Movement Diagram 11620J. 84311 F 143 76th Ave W 666 111 76th Ave W 0 1 Fo 123 0 F231 57 0 234 0 q157 F, 1 7, , "r 0 720 0 F720� Check In: 1777 Out. 1777 Intersection; SR 99/Pacific*Hwy @ 76 Ave W Location: Edmonds Date of Count: Sun 4425/99 Peak Period: 11:30 A 12:30 P Checked By: kgigml Prepared For: Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc %HV PHF EB 0.0% � 0.80 WB 0. 8% 0.83 NO 0.4% 0.75 SO 0.0% 0 .84 Intersection I_ 0.2% 1 0.82 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 KATHY PAGE 03 T C2 &C 0 Ov &t C ,&,&4 &C 13623 194th Ave NE. Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone. (425) 861-8866 FAX. (425) 861-077 Intersection: 1-mcation: Vehicle Volume Summary SR 99/Pacific Hwy @ 76 Ave W Dade of Count Edmonds Chocked By: Sun 4r,25M kgIgml Time Interval From North an (SB) SR 99/Pacific Ave From South an (148) SIR 99/Pacific Ave From Easton (WO) 761h Ave W From West on(E' 8) 76th Ave W Interval Total Ending at= L 5 F1 T L 5 R T L 5 R- --T L 5 10:45 A 0 9 86 0 --T— 5 = = -r -,d- -T- = -r -T- -6- -1-r -M- 11:00 A 0 o —1 W -0 —r "r— = —Tr —r —T— —5 =6 o —6— —r' 415 378 11,15A 0 27 7-33 7' o 'ffr -"r . 0 � 0 0 39 0 0 0 30- 3S4 11:30 A 0 26 135 0 7--0 119 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 "'-T- '2r --3W- 11:45 A 0 149 0 1 1 0 122 1 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 26 349 IFOOP 0139 9 161 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 = -0 42 456 ii-is P o ii. isr 0 -r 0 " 1-17 0 1 0 0 37 0 0 -0 4-29 12:30 P 0 32 199 0 2 T- -0 0 0 22 0 0 0 49 543 1 I Mr -0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -6- 0 0 1:00 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "r 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 P 0 0 :1 0 0--- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 11182 Total Survey 0_ 203 1190, 0 7 0 12 1 0 0 223 0 OF 0 272 3082 11:30 A to 12:30 P Peak Hou ummwy Total 0 1 111 1 MB 1 0 3 Z= 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1231 6 1 0 1 0 1 157 IT77 Oroach [if TZO 123- ---- - 1 1!3 r 1777 W* 0% 1 MR. 0.84 0.75 0.83 1 0.80 Prepared Legend: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight R= Flight -Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Poak hour Factor (Peak hourvolume I (4*Highest 15 minutes)) For: Gibson Traffic Consultanis. Inc. TM99Y2411 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - KATHY PAGE 08 1 TC2 nlaoc coirat coffsalt"o. iffc. 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: (425) 86141866 FAX: (425) 861-8877 .1 Turning Movement Diagram ---is 6 U 958 SW 236TH ST 21 929 8 SW 236TH ST 2 f7s, 0 E;l 100 7 27 277 497 5 17 U 1927 Intersecton. SR99/PACIFIC HWY @ SW 236TH ST Location: EDMONDS Date of Count. SUN 4/25199 Peak Period: 11:30 A - 12:30 P Chocked By: KG/GML Prqwed For: GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS INC 30 1 gn 1 14 F97-31 Check In: 1990 Out: 1990 %HV PHF ES 2.0% 0.77 WB 0.0% 0.50 NB 1.3% 0.83 85 1.4% 0.86 Intersection 1.4% 0.88 TM-99'Y246 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - KATHY PAGE 09 TC2 T cC .O=t C 'ac 'a4 I 13623 184th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 9W2 Phone: (425)861-W66 FAX:(4M)96L-8877 Intersection: Location: Vehicle Volume Summary SFM/PACIFIC HWY @ SW 2WTH ST Date of Count SUN 4rZ5M EDMONDS Checked By- KC4GML Time Interval From North an (S8) SP89/PACIFIC HWY -17 From South on (NB) SR99/PACIFIC HWY From Easton (WB) SW 236TH ST From West an (EB) SW MTH ST Interve Total Ending at L 5 H T I L 5 R T L I - S M T L 5 R 0:45A 0 1=-W-5 I _r a _71- 1W = -r 2 0 1 0 6 0 6 398 1:00 A 2 1-3- W 1-6 ur", 7W "Ir _r 1 3 0 a 0 1 4_16 11:15A 2 2 2 212 -_ 1 3 '3 7W —1 0 -1 2 6 0 4 4 430 11:30 A a 0 0 203 7 172 1 0 2 - 0 1 9 0 11 .45 A 2 1 205 12 7 183 . 5 0 1 0 1 0 7 2 1 1 415 15 12:00 P 5 6 6 204 6 —10 4 1 -9 225 4 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 2 234877 1 2 487 4 2 1 6 6 23 8 = 'T Nor — 1 0 0 1 1 a 1 7 543 I,.. 2 1 1 250 3 6 E P22 283 283 3 0 2 0 _-0-]F0 a 0 7 so 0 0 0 0 -7 -r 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 p 0 0- 0 -T- 0- '0 —0 0 —0 0 7 0 F. -7- 0 0 0 0 0 1:15P 0 0. '7- -T' R '0 —a 0 0 0`7- -T- 0 0 1:30 P o 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 o 3- 0 T 0 0 0 0 -_ - . � M I - TOW Survey 25 ­15 1 178�1 50 23 50 1 1664 1 22 1 — 0 14 3 I 9 2 S4 5 35 11:30A to 12:30 P Peak Hou Summary TOW T31 6 1 1 21 131 30 1 14 0 1 8 F 0 1 2 1 ZT 5 It jVW 7Gproach 958 973 10 1 49 1990 1% 1% U%, 0.86 0.83 0,50 Legend: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left Jurn S= Straight R= Pight-Turn HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highe3t 1 S minutes)) Prepared For GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS INC TM.9moi 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - IkATHY PAGE 04 C2 T r CC 0V 7t C 0'a S& I t ,wt T PC. 13623 184th Ave KE, WoodinviUe, WA 9wn Phone: (425) 861-8W FAX (425) 861-8877 Turn' Lng Movement Diagram 413 SW 2,MTH Sr 45 58 101 SW 2"M ST Fl 81 F S4�4 1433 5;� 45 W SS F1401] 1315 pop- 31 66 71 Ila z F2575 Check In.- 3457 Out: 3457 Intersection: 76TH AVE W @ SIR1041SW 244TH ST Location. EDMONDS Date of Count: SUN 4/25/99 Peak Period: 11:30 A 12:30 P Checked By* KGfGML Prepared For: GIBSON CONSULTANTS INC %HV PHF EB 02% 0.7s WB 0.3% 0.97 NS 17-1.7 Ow8l SB, 0.5% 0.71 Intersection 0.3% 0.83 TIVI- 99Y243 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - 1WHY PAGE 05 T C2 CC 0 t T O=t C 'Cr "&C 13623 1 Mh Ave KE, Woodinville, WA 98072 'M Phone- (425)861-M66 FAX(425)861-M77 InterseMon: Locanon: Vehicle Volume Summary 76TH AVE W SPJ04/SW 244TH ST Date of Count SUN Q25/99 EDMONDS Chocked By: KGIGML Time Interval From North an (SB) 76TH AVE N -T7 From South on (NB) 76TH AVE N From Easton (WB) SW 244TH ST From West on JES) SW 244TH ST Interval TOW Ending as L 3 R —'Ir- T L 1 1* H I L 5 R L 5 R 10:45 A -Tr-Wr I = = -M"- 2 —0 11 9 21 E) ' = 343 12 1 -T- 72W -W -Ir 705 32 22 ="Ir'r -Tr '4W - --.- 963 11:111 22 11 4 1 'N 23 2 26 327 16 0 8 239 5 704 11:30A 0 22 12 9 12 22 0- 17 311 28 0 16 299 7 759 11 -45 A 1 . 16 13 1 11 2 1 7 16 28 0 13 325 ir Tr -ffl- 7 790 r— 2.00 p 0 0 24 1 11 0 13 17 I 31 � 3 19 —1 15 279 9 824 12.15 p 0 30 a `0 11 -r —N— 16 26 1 16 357 Ez -1T -r 14 -r9- '4 -802 12:30 P 0 19 3 13 12 1 24 22 33 1 33 400 24 2 14 436---11 104-1 12:45 P -TW. —p 0 -= —0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -'r —0 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 p 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 IS 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 Total Survey 1 2 199 6 - 105 128 12171 9 1601284711581 4 96 124191 68 6591 11:30 A to .1 2:3D P PeA Mou Summary TOW 7 103 1 58 1 45 3 1 66 1 71 1 118 -5- 1 -8T 114ni 55 113151 31 MT Mroach 205 Zbb 7595 1 14vi 3457 Me 1% 00/9, 1 OW/6 - M-M- 5.71 0.81 Prepared Legend: T-- Number of hbavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L= Left -Turn S= Straight Rz Right -Turn W-- Heavy Vehicles PHP-- Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) For GIBSON CONSULTANTS INC TM- OM431 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - KATHY PAGE 06 ITC 2 T1zNCC0mff1CO3ff5U1t"&llffC. 13623 184th Ave NE. Woocrinville, WA 9W72 Phone: (425) 861-N66 FAX: (425) 8614877 Tuming Movement Dinram_ 3 z 1762 v I SW 236th ST 15 133 3 1 2 2 4 F_ 4 25 5 1 ra z 7 156 1 5 321 Intersection: 76th AVE N & SW 236thST Location: EDMONDS Date of Count. Sun 4/25/99 Peak Period. 11.15A 12:15 P� Checked By- KG/GML Prepared For* Gibson Traffic Con3ultants Inc SW 236(h ST 21 77 F137 Check In: 352 Out: 352 %HV PHF EB 0.0% 0.52 WS 12.5% 0.50 NB 0.0% 0.86 SB 1.3% 0.77 Intersectionj 0.9% 0.86 TM-99Y245 04/26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - KATHY PAGE 07 2 TC Tr&M-C Comat Comalt"49 AIC. 13623 18ft Ave NE, WoodinvUle, WA M72 Phone-, (425)861-8866 FAX(425)861-8877 Intersection: Location, Vehicle Volume Summary 76th AVE N & SW 236thST EDMONDS Date of Count Sun 4P2V99 Checked By. KG(GML rime Intemal From North an (SB) 7ft AVE N From South on (NB) 76th AVE N From East an (WB) SW 236th ST From Weston (EB) SW 236th ST Interval Total Ending at T L S R T - L R T L 5 R T L 3 R 10.45 A 2 = -r 1 0 0 3 0 1 -6 -T' 1 -I- 0 --f- -fMr -r -7- -4'r -r- -1 -r- -7- -7 0 1 a '= 2 95 11:15A 0 1 35 1 0 2 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 71 110A 1 1 30 6 0 3 37 Z 1 1 1 2 0 3 1 2 89 11:45 A 0 0 32 2 0 3 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 12M P 'r 0 45 4 a 0 37 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 8 102 12:15 P 1 2 26 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 -3 87 1 3 1 -0 -0 -0 0 0 0 0 1 78 -0 12:45 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TM 0 1:00 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -T.TM o 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 '—"-0 1-31) P 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -ro-tal Survey t 4 6 279 2 12 285 9 1 8 1 3 1 5 T 25 669 11:15A, to 1216 P Peak Hour Summary Total 2 1 3 1 1331 15 7 1 156 1 5 1 1 4 1 4 1 5 1 16 352 roach Itil lea a 25 1% 00/6 130/4, 01y, 1% I 0.17 10.86 0.3-0 0.52 -"Tw� Prepared Legend: T= Number of heavy vehicles (greatet than 4 wheel.-3) L-- Left -Turn S= Straight Rw Pight-Tum HV-- Heavy Vehicfes PHF-- Peak hour Factor (Peak hour volume / (CHighest 15 minutes)) For: Gibson Traffic Consultants Inc -rM-MY2451 04�26/1999 21:11 1-425-557-8240 TCC - KATHY PAGE 10 1� TC2 Tr-INC COM&I COWSMAWAS NF, 9807 13623 18ft Avenue Woodinvilic, WA 2 Phone: (425) 861-SW FAX: (425) 861-8877 Turning Movement Diagram 45 50000 13� covwr� % :,v P16P FAK410 1-0-r NICUM DRIVEWAY 31 13 34 F 71 1 17 1 2 1 51 Check In. 60 �-A Out: 60 %HV PHF Intersection: 54TH AVE W-P SEATTLE BAPTIST CHURCH EB, n1a , n/a Location: MOUNTLAKE TERRACE WB 3.2% 0.52 Date of Count: SUN 4125/99 NS 21.1% —0.48 Peak Period: 11:45 A 12:45 P S8 0.0% 0.50 Checked By: KGIGML Intersection[ 8.3% _ 0.52 Prepared For: GIBSON CONSULTANTS INC TM-99Y244 04/25/1999 21:11 1-4n-557-824U TCC; - KATHY PAUL 11 TIC 2 ZrsIrre Co=t CoawlAw# Adc. 13623 184th Avenue NE� Woodinville, WA 9W72 Phone: (425)861-M6 FAX:(4Z)861-N77 Irderseclion: Locaton. Vehicle Volume Summary 54TH AVE W (9) SEATTLE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUNTLAKE TERRACE Date of Count: Chocked By: SUN 412999 KGIGML Time. Interval From North an (SO) 54TH AVE W 'T-TL From South an (NO) 54TH AVE W From Easton (WO) CHURCH DFUVEWAY From West on (PS) nfa lnhwvaF Totill Endinqat S R T I L S R T L S H T I L S S R 10:45 A 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 2 rmo- 0 0 0 0 0 0 a —3 4 2 0 '1 0 9 77M 5 e 0 0 0 .3 —1 —0 '0 0 0 0 C) o 10 11:30 A 0 0 0 0 0 -'r 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0- 0 11 0 0 5 11:45 A 0 0 2 5 �0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 12:00 P -T 0 —0 0 1 0 1 1 0 -7- —0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 - 1=5 IS 7 4 0 0 0 4 0 —0 —4 0 5 0 0 0 0 1$ 12:30 P 0 0 4 0 1 0 --r = '1 —8 '0 7 0 0 0 0 0 29 I Z-45 P 0 0 0 a 2 0 —4 '0 '0 —1 '0 —5 '0 0 1 0 -10 1:00 P 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11513 -72�op 0 "r 0 0 0 -r 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total survey 0 5124 0 4 0 30 7 13TO 20 0 99 11:45 A to 12:45 P Peak Mou Summary Total 0 1 4 - 0 17 -1-2- 1 13 =018 0 0 1 0 1 0 ov Approach 10 19 31 0 --m- 0% 2170-- 3% n/a 8% 0.50 0.52 n/a Legend: Prepared For Number of heavy vehicles (greater than 4 wheels) L:-- Left -Turn S= Straight R-- Right-Tum HV= Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor (Peak. hour volume / (4*Highest 15 minutes)) GIBSON CONSULTANTS INC TM-NY2441 04/ 999 21 11 1�5 557---� TCC - KATHY PAGE 12 04/25/99 SUN 12:40 FAA 425 774 6403 KINKO'S LYNNWOOD Q003 EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC kc&-os'2.-j- SUNDAY 14/25/99 LOT PARKING STREET PARKING � W (54th Avenue West) OUT TIME IN OUT I N OUT 10:45 AM .10 11:00 AM z 0-/ 1115 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 NOON 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM If r STATE ROUTE 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 099 STATE OF WASHINGTON - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T R I P S S Y S T E M ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT STATE ROUTE FUNCT TRUCK PERCENTAGES MILEPOST LOCATION COUPLET CLASS SNGL DBL TRIPLE TOTAL 037.46 BEFORE JCT N 85TH ST 1 037.46 AFTER JCT N 85TH ST 1 038.47 BEFORE JCT N NORTHGATE WAY-N 105TH 1 038.47 AFTER JCT N NORTHGATE WAY*N 105TH 1 040.47 BEFORE JCT N 145TH ST*SR 523 1 040.48 AFTER JCT SR 523 WYE CONN 1 040.80 BEFORE JCT N 152ND ST 1 040.80 AFTER JCT N 152ND ST 1 040.98 AFTER JCT N 155TH ST WYE CONN 1 041.48 BEFORE JCT N 165TH ST 1 041.48 AFTER JCT N 165TH ST 1 041.74 AFTER JCT N 170TH ST 1 043.12 BEFORE JCT N 198TH ST 1 043.24 BEFORE JCT N 200TH ST 1 043.24 AFTER JCT N 200TH ST 1 043.48 BEFORE JCT N 205TH ST WYE CONN 1 043.52 AFTER JCT N 205TH ST WVE CONN 1 043.55 BEFORE RAMP SR 104 1 043.67 AFTER RAMP SR 104 1 043.89 BEFORE JCT 238TH ST SW WYE CONN 1 043.91 AFTER JCT 238TH ST SW 1 044.04 BEFORE JCT 236TH ST SW 1 044.04 AFTER JCT 236TH ST SW 1 044.89 BEFORE JCT 224TH ST SW 1 044.89 AFTER JCT 224TH ST SW 1 045.16 BEFORE JCT 220TH ST SW 1 045.16 AFTER JCT 220TH ST SW 1 045.43 BEFORE JCT 216TH ST SW 1 PAGE 61 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME ---------------------------------- 1994 1995 1996 1997 UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS 32000- 34000* 34000 36000 35000* 35000 36000 30000* 31000 32000 29000* 30000 31000 34000* 35000 36000 41000 34000- 34000 35000 39000 35000* 35000 36000 38000 33000- 34000 35000 36000* 36000 38000 46000 39000- 40000 41000 45000 39000- 39000 41000 37000 39000* 40000 41000 34000* 35000 34000 34000* 34000 35000 35000 33000- 33000 35000 34000* 34000 36000 34000- 34000 36000 0 3 4 0 �OO 34000 (f6 :OC PO 34000 (73�5000* 35000 36000 37000 34000 ff35000 34000 -43. 0'70 32000 G D 35000* 36000 37000 36000- 36000 37000 Aver e ,4 .59-9�*SR-10 36000* 36000 37000 36000* 36000 37000 6,1f -w�4 38000 39000 33000- 35000 * BASED ON ACTUAL COUNT 9 * SOURCE OF TRUCK PERCENTAGES , ;2 , z 7, V5e 2.5% 4--be c-Ase"Atve, STATE ROUTE 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 STATE OF WASHINGTON - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION T R I P S S Y S T E M ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME STATE ---------------------------------- ROUTE FUNCT TRUCK PERCENTAGES 1994 1995 1996 1997 MILEPOST LOCATION COUPLET CLASS SNGL DBL TRIPLE TOTAL UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS 024.45B KINGSTON FERRY LANDING C 1 2800- 2600- 2800* 2900- 024.45 BEFORE EDMONDS FERRY LANDING 1 5500* 5200* 5700* 5800* 025.13 BEFORE JCT SR 524 SP3RDAVE-PINE ST 1 11000 11000 8700* 9000 025.15 AFTER JCT SR 524 SPUR WYE CONN 1 8700* 9000 025.44 BEFORE JCT SR 104 W BND 1 10000 9700* 9800 9000 025.70 AFTER JCT SR 104 W BND 1 18000 18000. 18000 19000 026.43 BEFORE JCT 100TH AVE W 1 19000 19000. 19000 20000 026.43 AFTER JCT 100TH AVE W 1 24000 24000* 24000 25000 026.80 BEFORE JCT 95TH PL W 1 25000 25000 21000* 22000 027.12 BEFORE JCT 232ND ST SW 1 20000 21000- 22000 22000 027.12 AFTER JCT 232ND ST SW 1 22000 21000* 21000 22000 027.39 BEFORE JCT 236TH ST SW 1 21000* 21000 22000 027.52 BEFORE JCT 238TH ST SW WYE CONN 1 23000* 23000* 23000 24000 027.58 AFTER JCT 238TH ST SW WYE CONN 1 21000- 21000* 23000* 22000* 027.79 BEFORE RAMP SR 99 SB 1 22000* 23000* 21000 (ED (:E� 028.26 AFTER JCT SR 104 WB 1 41000* 41000 028.83 AFTER JCT 76TH AVE NE-blERIDIAN AVE 1 41000 44000 2, 2- 029.33 BEFORE JCT 5TH AVE NE 1 46000* 47000 029.33 AFTER JCT 5TH AVE NE 1 47000* 49000 029.41 BEFORE JCT 6TH AVE NE 1 50000 51000 50000* 52000 029.41 AFTER JCT 6TH AVE NE 1 50000 52000 50000* 52000 030.14 BEFORE JCT 19TH AVE NE 1 22000 22000- 22000 23000 030.14 AFTER JCT 19TH AVE NE 1 23000 23000* 23000 24000 030.55 BEFORE JCT NE 195TH ST*25TH AVE NE 1 22000 21000* 21000 22000 030.57 AFTER JCT NE 195TH ST WYE CONN 1 19000 18000* 18000 19000 031.27 BEFORE JCT 35TH AVE NE*NE 185TH ST 1 17000* 17000 18000 18000 031.39 BEFORE JCT 37TH AVE 1 18000 18000 18000. 19000 031.39 AFTER JCT 37TH AVE 1 18000* 19000 18000* 19000 PAGE 72 * BASED ON ACTUAL COUNT + SOURCE OF TRUCK PERCENTAGES 77,7, R7 J� 4V ZIA. I C IAN t7 doe It g000" �0007 mo dff AA 41 ag oq al :t AM , g , , " ;. A-Z 1�-, MIR -11li 71 1p tie, Nz Mr 7 74. SHEET: OF RAFFIC c BY:— �Q DATE CHECKED DATE PROJECT�—'PaW& JOB NO. 6,5-1-L SUBJECT IM 0. ur-"+ 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE - SUITE 100 o EVERETT, WA 98201 o PH: (425) 339-8266 e FAX: (425) 258-2922 RR',A"FoA'C" SHEEM OF a SUL 7 IM78 BY:.. g A DATE 04 /A CHECKED— DATE- - PROJECT. Qof a kvod ;,I- —JOBNO. 76 SUBJECT co 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE e SUITE 100 9 EVERETT, WA 98201 o PH: (425) 339-8266 - FAX: (425) 258-2922 c RR',AW841'C" SHEET. OF BY: DATE CHECKED- DATE PROJECT (�ea JOB NO. el - tns-a SUBJECT Z2!�� -8 v/ C' 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE o SUITE 100 o EVERETT, WA 98201 o PH: (425) 339-8266 - FAX: (425) 258-2922 aR',ABF8F'l'C" 0 SUa. Ir PROJECT �� ea M-i SU13JECT ILABL SHEET: OF BY-- P �, DATE 04A. CHECKED DATE M)R Mr) 47JI 54 ....... . . . . . . 1W 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE o SUITE 100 o EVERETT, WA 98201 e PH: (425) 339-8266 0 FAX: (425) 258-2922 aR',A"F3F'l.'C" SHEEM OF a SUO 7 I BY: &,l DATE CHECKED DATE PROJIECT(�eaw& JOB NO. SUBJECT 21 7- �le IV, Mill t `71:2 1 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE - SUITE 100 9. EVERETT, WA 98201 * PH: (425) 339-8266 e FAX: (425) 258-2922 a�R0,24 OICH PROJECT (�Pg SUBJEC SHEET- OF BY: �/\-j DATE 0 41.� CHECKED— C DATE JOB NO. 1A "V/P !W?7, 1712 PACIFIC AVENUE - SUITE 100 * EVERETT, WA 98201 PH: (425) 339-8266 e FAX: (425) 258-2922 A, s4 e 4 c2 r- 1 1470 -;�4arze J-1w,f-r-r- J U 111 r-M J- 404T" 41 all: t, 4 77r .'se I 4 7-12 2- 10 r-7— 4 1- e, H L'--4 mw- 4&.,Az voolm R; 41404op vp-T 6 A, ?i&ruIL.6C4 Fr,,s,-r 45- Mo v mcr. ,I em— e- 4 02 FiLP. 'V4 I . ".00 )7 is' 1 64% I" - 0, AIM or 574, os' N1 0* Is. , s .0 :too,, --rEL I PHONE fSA-Ciz- 8/—,Akl:� it k 7 M EI-r E Ac' __-0 -1,94 rlaw ill.1.1 I-VIL III I'll K�4 Ea F_- f— — — — -- Ac vikle- �p- EAfEMENT 9 + + Z. �-z EET FILE —"Z 1 20' il 4 t + + 4- 76 th AVEN UE W. I TE PLA N of I a rst%n 1 *17, WALTER E. EAGLE AWCHITECT - A.I.A. —P-0-06SE.6' 801 WIMLCH ROAD P,%LO ALTO, CAL.I$=OANIA FIRST SERVE RACQUETCOURTS "w C-46150 76thAVE 5 242nd ST. SW. (41LO 3 P E3 - 4 7 8 0 EDMONOS. WASHINGTON U) E TF— )AJ �u x . . co 0� RCKUP FEB 1 1978 Rik - 1 U-1 I rer-j" 4�-�or, eacaq-s e---WFAc,- tdA44C�4 ON A&j fm Lim 6-44" 94 tAPHVA-,e-A- Q F- p;104ug, 6a4-,,p=rA 10 rz- 4 e L, - Li L,;—:: mFe. 0A.4e ZeArr. 1,10 WATT'll W4%LWWA ! wators-u ;� LAM e vnrr6 A m-ewtx--� ,A,, sa w-a- +iw-,4 Fo,,-r 1 401 lwv t 4.. F2<4 C2 &4=5- FM v. ,v4,. "". A10 W4. oa ca — ----------- ;rl r_lvr top-, 01, Ar C, - I �r EE Lft �� Ak -'IRE -spl;� t �j Kl- S U- 4- CTIM CALEMUT s a ew ce- fla FILE S-s SWEE 4� 4g 4v CL 76 th AVENUE vi. �. SITE P 1. , w), 00 WALTER E. EAGLE ARCHITEC'T 00i W13LCH ROAD PIWO AL-rD, CALIFORNIA C-4080 (41 Lil ) r0l C -!4 7 0 0 z GITIZ PLAN 1w 046pd,sEo— -n!vwQi:l FIRST SERVE RACQUETCOURTS 1/20 TO th AVE Ek 242 nd ST. SW. EDMONDS, WA9,Hlf4GT0X OAJ I J., ENV I RONMENTA LANALYSIS, EXEMPT ONDER DISTRICT SEPA SECTION -Vft,'M-jN PARA ITEM c� DATE��'Z'L-78' sy KC) INTERPRETATION AEFERRED'TQ�,'� O�ATE By O�H.' U.G, -'COND--l�-,'--XV ADD GO Kt'FT' �3, H AEMV ck-r' FT H NET- L"CL-CKT LF T PERMIT TY P7 &�-y DATE GRANTED PERMIT TYPE- 6A-fE- �GR ANTED FOREIGN CONTACTS COMPANY TYPE Z5-c.,% �sr FOREIGN CONTACTS COMPANY—Lka,�'=*�lcrt-o T -Z:6- � �' 7( YPE EASEMENT,, z GRANTOR DATE GRANTED EASEMENT GR�NT,0 ._A)'KTF- GRANTED WATER SEWER GAS FORM DATE AEC. FUSING COORDINATED' 13Y LOG POSTED I INVENTORY MAP POSTED `1 POLE DEPT. Ix T- 7W F- DETAIL - A NY M A L -1C A. �s W cum ITH IZ :� 1k. 71 -roF, DE 0) lu m VA VALV, k��Mle ale v 16F�- TA K E ZY tf -4JL- F45 cw cw co A' co Ilk V1 E� '5AT 4,17 C-IC-01 w. Z`lq S, 55, 1-2 IF Al /,4/ V IN VlAlit. N 00 55' 1 1 E 7A M K -TV 4 s e- wz 5� 7 th �AVENUE w q '7 w w WA 725�- '"'OoplAl x-4 4�aP "6,4 TIC) A "N 0114 Y;J� IJ M] PA I' P-11 SITE,- .'G M A 01 -N,. G -P L'A'N -7 -Z Q J oir. ot vunc worKs Ap 1D I - 7`1 1,561 -lift exv:;�-n �44A f5LOa - ^PP I T1 0 4 574,0Z <a W-421P e)e-lsr. y 4PUT7jrV.A A m ?POV, t�l HfEVJ alZ?;, 1 Fy,s.H7,, �1501L F9EP, PFPL 66 eg6T- A,4,,PAVIWJ CO: -k "Ic"Or. X cl) TOF 7, q r-xts-r, ee,,i -typ C 4.02 41 0j, 19. FAII 9 16.VP (1) ^vv (1) $TA LL Agr.> A, e, :-:>TA" AAP J: PAVI �4a pAV I q e4 "0 00., Tla PLAt4TI44o 4(- rzxlevrr. havJ,`;i6sH L-oc,,vrlori 2. %1 F� T, S" 70 M 7 6 t, h. AV E�., . -.W I C-0 AA 15;-rA-A-j rPrP-7�. to 4 0/0 -3 LEGE"D FFzTR-�e,5-71 i:;,diLPirlZ4 AvPITIOH r4pw A-e;P'FPAL- T 'P^\/' rin a i -4 LAr--,0 , lil NORTH ELEVATIOW. @) Am-rtot4 eoILvIHf-j WEST ELEVATION-, �z g,6, P-W P, . a;t4-rW., -ew . P, 9 4 F-M T91M 60HTIN. A" ccizHF-w�, -FUL-i- al-OTI-I, di loci F-A, %154ZT, �Zx4 OA-,4)Leo To 4 1 1/2-11. 1 sJ& WAO�46v. LI\ -IMP -T 4)<&)4 ioll '5LF-Ops4z.-� olel, Lae ovim rUPLIW71 COL. LU - LAM2, .4),4�, eot4rtk rz� Z (o 6A '4 -114' Af` rLA - -- - --------- 4x , S REEN� M `H I C-A-L R.0-0,F. Ek; �/Wy REVISIONS ARCHITECT: REGISTERED � EGI VARC ARdH.1T9CT- I L FLAN7 F OMMEHDAT(clHe + OF-C-4DUOW5 '5MOP- 77-eF- HT EMM rLe MAF�E OPIV-. 1 0 1 60HIF9XoWep F-YEW-UH TKEF- 6' HT, F-XAMM-F-.- FlHF. 8D 5\IaK41�MH 56KEEI-i GHKU15 ZI HT EXAMN-F-&"' VIDAHUM) ILE%. t7 F-vMirr-at-i FLOWEK104 6HKOb ZO� HT EgAMMZ. A7.NZA aAHOTHU6. EvaK4v,,F,H Ar-oWHD4�7YF-r. 611HT EXAMPLE,* VIH4A IVY. WNBY:-. e-,L,. CKED BY: ARCHITECT: 'REGISTERED ARCHITECT -j to PI a nter W a I k wdy.- q P I ant Const. 8 5 L. F.18 As p h_ Driv,e., Helical 14Go.Alum. 40 Storm ��er a t 3% Const. C.13 No.4 -Top 30 x As' h 'D r iv'e 2.90.1 Ex. 8"Storm Sewer t \\)M- I n v. 2 9 5.55 L L JL_ E x. Top 300.20 0/0 Ex. C. B. Top 300.69 f.s' 1 0% ?.. I nv.298.46 Inv. 29.9.52 r, 0 SeWer jotm o CITY OF EDMOND Soli d Co 4,r S I e v. 300. 00 P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV V6 EXAMINED Const.C.B.No.5** Alo'03�s W'�F ._0 /A By DATE 7 Top3O5.2 LC Inv. 296-85 An REMARKS STREET A 0 rh co C> e " ID ____z:�—Mainte nonce Ladder , /// a Chain j Chain welded to Fr a me-..... cu 0 6X to ..z . I W Note * Maintence a. C3 IV. Ladder under offset Lid 0 L) 0 A, 6 _�Coscade OitRestrictor '2� CATCH BASIN MANHOLE NO.1 Const. C. S. N4 3 Mod. CIR-12or Equal 'i L'� CY Top 299.2 Ci a, 8 Storm 12" D �E TA I L' W/ ORIFICE Inv. 295.24 "1 Q U) Storm -SCALE. 1/2"= 1 0 Sto .8 to 6 Inv.294.64 se �CQ/ / — r7 qj C E So 0 MAY 2*6 1978 SI.O.'02 I Const. C.B. No.2 Public Works Lieg. —(Top 298.45 1�, 3 1/," O,ri f i c e d 'I nv. 2 94. 8 1 t/, 77 CALE I S 20, 5 L. F. 8" -Const.3 Helical 14Go.Alum. C\j DETENTION SYLST E PLANTOR P L Ak St. Sewer at 0.5 48 Ln I V NOTE: EXISTING UNDERGROUND:FACILITIES HAVE BEEN ACQUET BLDG. 0 SHOWN ON TKIS DRAWING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING Co nst. C. B. IvH No I eon - 4eqK 7 16 T. 2-7 N., RA E. THE CONTRACTOR IN LOCATING SAID FACILITIES'LIIIL THE Top 300. 0 1 N SlE. 1/4,S.E. 1/4,SECTION 31 W. M. FIELD. THE CONTRACTO'R SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR Inv.L,294.64 (SeeDetail) CHECKING ACTUAL LOCATIONS IN THE. FIELD AND CHECKING EDM 0 N D S IWA S IN G TO N 'WITH APPROPRIATE AGENCIES ­THAT MAY HAVE URDERGROUN0. FACILITIES wi,THiN.THE PROJECT LIMITS*. THE CONTRACTOR C041C. SHALL BE SOLELY RE L SP014S IBIF,FOR A L NY, DAMAU L F0 IJND I FR- Rea, MaWaft 41,dadeaeeo, .190C. N VAIMMM � � A . . :. I � I . . . i . . . � . . ..! 'I I I . I . � . I I .. � � I . . . . *� . - . ..: I LEQAL QE . 1 i . . I I . � � . . . % . � . . . . .­ PARCEL A' . . . . . . . . , . I I . I . F TRACT 10, LAKE MCALEER FIVE ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING , . � . . I ..: TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS. PAGE 48, RECORDS OF I . . - IN MUNUMLNI (;AbL . . . I S.W (PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) .1 . 11,fle.A tX5e,.*.q R'a"ew, , . . . . � . SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON, . . W, W-W-W . /_4ZNU �STREET . Ole, . . . 40 F . . ­ __ - I W � :_ . . I . FEET AND THE EAST . .. , -W_W= _" *W 1� r CITY OF EDMONDS FOR ROAD PURPOSE BY QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED JUNE 9, . I W IV W ze Zer, s I -W-W- ; I I . . . I I . ­`7 - . �� . S 8 8- �16'1 7 11E 331,41' 1. . . BRASS CAP WITH PUNCH MARK VA& Alto. S-TV'A0%'X=C15. -CX-*- . 1964 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1703055; AND . I . . of.c.atqcj ejjwe�c**n ao ve-%N^* FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF THE WEST 125 FEET OF I - , __ - -� - __ I � 45 �7) THE EAST 165 FEET. THEREOF; AND . - - - - �>_ - - �S_ -S-S-S - - �_ � �S_ = - S - S_ j--- �_ ___ i._ /� � . S_S_-rn�4 I'_ S . � - S �� - . AVt4 2w.).11 osodw. I EXCEPT THE SOUTH 115 FEET OF THE WEST 1 10 FEET OF THE EAST 150 FEET ...�� - S - . . . . . . I b::_�_,u S -::, �_ I'll I THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 2 FEET OF THE EAST 152 FEET to J__ _G _� =�� --s S:: �­flp�..:_ 1 6 5_AT __ , \191a - - - -S =� __ -;; S . I � _� % . . OF THE SOUTH 115 FEET THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT 0 N ��UffNET91;_ � b V V . - I I _ 1 1 O,kJ1E MCALEER FIVE ACRE . t-0 (4 � - to I?- DESCRIBED INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 1966 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. �. �_ __ 7 __ __ . . . . . � PARKING SPACES REO'D � 2 PARKING SPACES PROPOSED � 2S --A I .: . . I BARRIER FREE PARKING . -SPACES 1-- I L 0 __ __ ---% _____ 1905899; AND .- __ - .- I . A r1o, DMONDS WITH I 0 I - NY V . EXCEPT THE NORTH 142 FEET Or THE REMAINDER, . ,. - I - . ------ L___ - � --- I NE CORN . I . . 188. i 91 -A - I -_ - P SLOPE EASEMENT, (NO WIDTH GIVEN) REC NO. 1703055. v- CORN I I � - . .- `11_.-_7.._.­ - . ..." ... I- _.... I k- 1 20.00, . . I TRACT 1 0 C 1 O' , 30 60 . I . PARCEL B: � I :� I -1 I I -, . 1� .1 , 1. LO 25 ACCESS i I . I EMEMIMEM 031111111MEMEMEM11 . (D vt 'A To, ____ . . . EM -_ - NERMEM. � I � . ...'­ ­ " S . . � 1 401 GRAPHICAL SCALE: 1 it = 30' . : THE SOUTH 19 VEET OF THE NORTH 152 FEET OF LOT 10, LAKE MCALEER FIVE ACRE . tN I . . I . . . .e I . . I . TRACTS. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, V_ . I') (-7 I I Z% I - . , I 4 - --_(__�.�_., ___:`_,_."___._1'_.____* 1" _. -.'.-.--,�".'-7,':.*!*'-.'-.:-.'�-.---,�.:: ... 7777-_�,---. -.------.-.­: -------- �' ----------,--- .,-.--- ­ -------- ----- -- -------.,- --- - --- - -- - , OS OF SNO140YISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; co .. / %. -_ . . -1--2on __11-4 , - .. ... ��,�'.........�''..-��.-.-.,�-.�'....�-.-.... ­ . .. PAGE 48, RECOR . . I, 0 1 ___(!.9_t3M_ . _­­ � ...... 1_­­_.-__..-___,___� ..... _­ .­..­,­­ I—. 11 ­1 � .. ..... ­.......1...1._ ­1_.1­_.,.___1..1_ ­1 ...1-1. . .. . EXCEPT THE' EAST 165' FEET THEREOF: - s S I I � _( - In 6 �_- - . Ili _0 . . - I 4- It v . - I -1 . e�� �5 1 _ � r4 f A , ) � I . I _� _ _- _ - - I . � .. " M f-,-- -- - - � * � I . I I .. � co TI!2 . I0 I � el- z y 41 k (q *41 tll�' I b b ,�gX�� 90 _ � . SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, a - �- 9 mv 0 O.- - - - - ." . 0C,vJ f* . I 41st. 11 ro ___ -1%J1,_�A1't:_-_- --f - 1 ".1'-_?__;1__Ww�( -.,--..-.--.�.',,-.".�tt�,,F,Qr-7j4T.A-.- . 1", EN . , . -1 (� 0) a) C4 . - ___ -6--, - .2u . � 01 \2-- W �_____ . � - ­_ I 0 k.0 . W Ia.g - 'a.- �. - �PhL_,. _ � . ....... __.___.____.....___ I . . I 1. - . ir � _. _,(�� . ­ ­­....­ . .... . ­­ ...­_­ ­ - - ­ -e W , L k - M A_ .. �. � I., '11 VA Wb P 0) a flgt3.- - . I - -, ,e ­ - - , ----- .___ - -- - 8 - �tnm­ - - H U. 2 . . �----..-,..--D-�ff-I..F-(-L-,�*-*,-",-- mst� &WW tt.,M4_.__.t;4j4�,4K _.e_kV_-,_- - - I %�_­J - 0 -0. W 0 ^ I . I .­._­___._ zi . a ­-, ___.­­.. /11 0 z 0 e _ ....­...'. __:: ENT$' � 0 1 W ;,: � , �� =d1w.v4 rM � I CL I I . . M �I _�t ,A - - 0 0 LAJ . ,7/�_-.�.--_.-_-._-. - -q I 0. - In " q a � U (3 . (4 " .TK , L_ �. __ - t­A �__ �//" to . . , FULL RELIANCE HAS BEEN PLACED IN CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY - W t"..._._ - N I _. I ­ ­d9tv" Zone , . - .. Z . 9i 'I - I "_ I - I I _J?AL CIL ---... .. ...... ... I , � . �, 5 i ft . ") I -J a- I M T_ 3 ow in JW, CD . 0 , �_ � O-qw 2 I W 00 -it 'Ixtaq , - DATED NOVEMBER 5, 1997 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND . �///, ICRUW U I LEQEND vN - , COMMITMENT NO. 363656, C_ -_6 �/,� .--. -.I--.--,--.----- iEE, T_ . . REVELATION OF* EASEMENTS.. NO FURTHER SEARCH OF THE RECORD HAS BEEN ,� i I- t� I I RODNFY L. JUNTUNEN I z _ Corner Flag 0 SANITARY SEWER MAN:40LE . . 20 0 , I 1�?. . . _ 0 CATCH BASIN I . MADE. la- �14 -- - ­_ K -1 - I ,e�l � - . . w =� �,�/" 101' I " 2� I V) 0, . Setbacks _Re L�tred - -GAS LINE . ' , CO . I - __q_ e CLEAN OUT - THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, AND .. =) S* I I I . I no _ Actual G 2 ), �//, CIP, L3 W I Uiz Front . I ni: I , I I k , . 00 ___ ______� - TION§ THEREOF, FOR 0 � >. I . It( 5NX5 I . V_ I LL�;F � I , GD LINE . M INGRESS AND EGRESS PER ' � I X /�,/, . ) :_ 11 - I M GAS METER . INSTRUMENT FILED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1905899, AS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT I /. 0 �,�,, I . I 0 EJ3 ;: Sides _____ I . I. I . -9. RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. V) �///, . .E OF SOUTH I to I ------- t7- DBx MAIL BOX . _D- STORM DRAIN LINE I .1 . FILED UNDER RECORDING NO. 21268. e� . - . /. 11 I *�U_ 0 - ) R I /� N . FEET OF THEI t:J LO I I 0z -- . : . WASHINGTON. I . . , P 1.52 00 I t 7 i - -0-� -S- SANIT.ARY SEWER LINE I I, _a! .. I F TRACT 10 1 0 1 . C I _______� G STORM DRAIN MANHOL.E . THIS PROPERTY IS BENEFITED BY AN EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT / . . � N . I . . . . 1 15 1 . I �W�_ ,a SIGN . I -W- WATER UNE . '. . ONDITIONS THEREOF, FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTIL�TIES ! . ,,,I I 00E ( , 6 H T __� . . . ��� --I - t�_ /// I . I � - -_ . : . I . . I IC'r t59- - . PER INSTRUMENT FILED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8601240161, RECORDS OF ; 11 I . tj . 165' @ 90' I I P or_ I I 1. . , __ .. . - I __ I __ � - ; il --IVIYALVE I I - I -:) > 0') I . -)rr- EDGE Or ASPKALT SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, -_ I �%r *, I ­111111111 I 11 40tx6zf I, ri - , __ , ,- '. ­ 125' @ 90' L) r__ % k U 1", _1111, I Tie. _. - . . . > I Cr . - . . I .,:. I f i * .7 k - -_ I ! I � UJ Lr) I LO .1 . t_t: k THIS PROPERTY ' IS SUBJECT TO A MUTUAL PARKING EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT. I � a) I / I 6i I (.0 -L--. -t v- -4E TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, PER INSTRUMENT FILED UNDER .0; J, �0, I I CONCRETE RETAINING �ALL SOUTH I r_ - , iQ, � . * ,�- AND T . 9 , (O NE ] 0:;;) CID A tAhj'k - - - - 11 - I . . - t I , , ;­ 19 A RECCR2ING NO. 8601240162, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON. 'k 61 t!J Cn - 4­jtl'�.-�"-­ _r . , � - RTY LI I zo _7�_�M- -- -- - -V------- .-- i�-� .Vv. ._ - �Rr - ---- - __ ,--e,------c-f-�,---iq.ok"c..,-.�.--. .-,-'W- _/ -_ � - 1. - �] I 01 0 - -_ . I ­_ f - .- ­, SOUTH LINE OF NORTH - -7 _N � . Ulm � -.-- ,� . 0% I � A 75'�- - . �.. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A MUTUAL SIGN AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND .. . , , L :& � .1 S 88'26'1 7"E I ... I ..--R __1011.46, �fltk - . (P - __ __ __ .1 ti, I 12 1 0 ,-__-_e_J,k14C;1v_w __ � :, , .� .11 , - 11K_ 1_(0_-.__ - fD . . I �__ , . k - ___ -.11 � 11- , 5.00, . i ­ .. ....I. - _____L_.._1 ­ . . . ... _­­� 2�701 � ... �Jhg� - -1 - _ - . > LI_ LO - , t.;, ,� CO'NOITIONS THEREOF PER INSTRUMENT FILED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8601240163, I z � , -L , ) , .- 1. . I I ..: . I - - - - - - k . __ . .- ­­­ - - ___ _9 - � I ,�,-.----.RECORr';S-'OF"SNOHCVISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON, ,:�G 4. A ­­ V.�..Py,v�dl __ . � . ;*v la� 9, C1 0 I ,_ _­1 ., . D - --- - I Ul - ." � - ::ttl t. . _� __ I IV ____ .- ­ - - � ... ......... "'MIL 11 ' . 1, �, E� 07t. - 1. '. - * -.-.--.-..-- -7�0 , - - L 1H_ I -P ___ipe - , __ . , I - -1 _ 1.1:01 w _W , ­ .. . I .. ;;;_;�_ I it Q P, I - / 1. . :E Jb­ , , . - - - . - K I - ----- -, THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY ENCROACHMENT BY OR ADVERSE C'.LAIM WITH KA # *.' - . ; . . 0. -N 0 --..--. , . $0VAA-, 7 - t -_ � - I I N W - 1�11 � k . --- . . , - � .� I 9 IV I . 11:5 I - . . I " 0 A'( .---., tt�t� 009- (n t - _... I P ex Vf-­ :_T_ RESPECT TO ANY UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION APPURTENANT TO. SAID PREMISES ' ("� , .5ti 1 . , C 0 .z 0 . N-1- ,­ - T U -, �__t , , ­­ k OM 00 r,T,IFP PPI-,PEpry. THE EY17ENCE riF WHICH IS NOT DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC X, . .. , I � I A ---Nw . . I 0 ­­­_­�­ � to - _ ____ q &�A - ---- -- , n'-:01a ___-.­",. _._f .1 . 0%`1 - I 0 1 ­­­ % , /1� I %_�J . I X - t �* P .6 � * I - U10 --- -� 4- �. _WN(a.- . .v. , *'L �k _ - .- - --- --- � I K 2 . a_...9tv_ � _"�ep _- " ­_ . . -­ '-'---' _.1.. _ . � . . PEI�`)Prj . 1 ,6 IRW /I �� I, - ; . . ­ , I . I . :!. � \t. - ifl - I - - __ , _.______ __ .-----.-,. .-­-­­­­­'- ­­ ­ ­­­­ _ __1. ­ I X � � .. ­ .. ­...._ I . . to N - - - - ,I' . -1 - __ _.__ __­_.___1_­_._­_­ --- � . . .,.,,;;;�� , . 1 i X - MW 0I (O Z).iasl r_J In M . � . . . _ -A U . W 11� - . ... � � I .�� tztl 1;� L - --- I . THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON DOES FORM A MATHEMATICAL,LY CLOSE V) , � I ;­ . . - . . UJ �c 0- �1, ?_ �,__5_rAw * . ­ �_& � 1. .4 , .. .. a; M . 0 - ��5 - UPT,_ M_,__�._.____-­------­--- F-5k:RE I . . . ..� 11 ­ I. I-, Ot -,-I.- .: _ = ­­­...... - . . CONCRETE TILT -Up ILD . I .1 . � 1. I "M V_ I �� �Ng c4m 7 . - I M , I 2-STORY U1. a I I : .. 6- ­ .. 4, I n �5 > _­ __1 ­. . I . BU, I' . . .- __­. �...__/' ; ­ .- . 1. . .- ,.---.--- - �). . ".-,-,*,- ­­­.- ...._­._....._­ 11 >�- I 24228-76TH AVE. WEST .. -.T. I` � J " T.- --- . . BASIS Or BEAR:NGS PER SUA�V-� Ery REID, MIDDLETON & ASSCCIATES' INC, DATED A . - I - ­ , . ---.X- . � ,.i ___ - � - -_ -_ - I I . I � . .. i-11MI, ___ 0�. * ­ - � ,/ 1; X . . LL __ . . . OCTOBER 5. 19-7 AND RECOqDE:) IN VOLUME 6 OF SURVEYS. PAGE 88, UNDER (st � .1 I . , . ... .... . : - .. ­ _ ­ I. 1.;z . I - : I . . . .. . .. ____­1 q .11. . z . 01 = � 1, - I . . .- �, �4 t _v_ ,_ .­: ­.�3�. . .4 � . 11 , 0 ,:� I . RECOR:ING NO. ,01"C2- . .=:ODDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON. I I I I.., . .. . I. I -A I . - . ! � I i I.- (n,0 - I I :3t LO . . ., . . TAALV , � I I LJID_ (N . �. . . . . . t I z . UJ z .... , .. . �0/. V. , . .. /i �, . I - 00 My) . . .. ., . I 1['�Glq - J. 0 � I A REON WERE VISITED IN THE FIELD .DURING THE COURSE r) . I I � .4 ( - . . , W-%g o I I THE VC1,4UVENTS SHOWN HE . . I ()� :1: I UJ .1 � - I I I . . . I I � . I � L r C Lli . . . . it ANGULAR AND LI ERE MADE WITH A - . I . . .....�. . - -_ U� - "... I- 4 0,1 ()� U) I . . . OF TH'S SURVEY. '_ . is)Q�fl Mb Rk I * 11,� I ,� - , 0 D . 48 TOTAL S'rATION CALIE?PATED AT A NGS BASELINE WITHIN THE LAST I Kt� D Lr� Sul i I ; I -01 , :- I Cn. b W W CD 4< I 1, TOPCON GTS . . I . U3 . . . I I �� noir . . _. . _N1 cli U J r- ; YEAR. I . I . L .. t . . . ­ . 1 ii \ _____1 .. . f , W0. M > Z y I q . . : � L . . . I., : . I 1� � 1��, ... .. . ; I In I �L) UJ � I '_ . . . I I j� ;.1 .... .. ..--.. ­ I Cn I . . D ; . . . ,-- . -­E PRCPERrY VEDICTrD ANIO SEs AN AREA Or ... . ... L I %.-.-.-.-.--- % � I I . " 8 I �i. . I DESCR19ED HErEON ENCLO, .- . , L . " I . '---'- '- ­­ % _i 11 . N UJ 'I . i . . . ­�� "­ - r- APPROXIMATEL'y 56-AS!, SOUARE rEET OR APPROXIMATELY I 3015L ACRES b F ­ . ­1 . . ' A ., -I' I. . J��.,� ""' . . � 0 1 . � > - � . . I . .:-. . ­.­ - - I ..i 0Ln . . O 76TH AVENUE WEST AND 242ND STREET S.W. I . . -, PARCEL' �, #0 .. t :R < In X _,_*_�_ \1 ., I \ _­1'.�_ q� - " - . * .. �.._, - .�._, THIS PROPER . L _� � . ­ � I A __'. "­­t: ' " :'� :L � I !� "3� , . . S�,n 9-�WTS-Or-WAY. . - ... I? ZONING, LINE , � . . I , . � ;< . -W% 14-FRECN AS PUBLIC � . . . - ." '. ____ - _. .i 1. - :._.A -_ , " , > _-,_,_� I =- ,I' I \ I .. = "' - �l�� _11-.__�.. . ­L - �. . - ; b . , - . - . . . I I � Iq . l , ., 11 .. .. . 11-11.1 2199"M - I" 11 � I'll I . . CLn) I I . " ZONING IS AS SHOWN: BN - NEIGBORHOOQ BUSINESS AND BC - COMMUNITY . - .1 .. / . L �_ I � , . ix_ - . 1. . . ­ N ------ ;I rl- 8�!SS,?,IESIS PER THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. I \ 8 6 ! . - - . .. .. t R 41 . . _!&�%& L 11 ,?: S 8 -2 *17-t )i I I 11 A - - -, _­ . W - 240 TH . Il', % . I , I uil� W U63-1 . , it t T_ . 0.00' i LAKE I . . . . , _' :�'Aq_ � k,L I t f---4 I I ­ * > 16 I -I > 15 -I- - 7111� -1 - I I I ;ul I I' I 1� - I t4 11 I ­ ?'/'/, 40 � (it 71a__ I I I/, I , '4� 1 � I I I �/Z/, 11) , E "NT I' .. I J I . _____ �,'_ ' � " I (I I � I I � I t4 " I N :1-N I'E 19 � I ,U4 'I I I � 'T I L3 I � 4 N R L H10 I .0, (�) I _ I _ , � 'it! I % , (D I - � , - � 6__.____"i__ I (4 h'"t = , I ` _­ C ( j _- � -__ __ r� - - - I 'K '. ?_ - rd 0/, _� . , . - z - - BALLINGER . \ . R - L � � , ­% � I .�� .. -?I, - 61 . .. __ -'LT'4 . . L .. T_ 14- F5L 241 ST SW I U0 . ... _ '­­ I .. P - 0 . rl-% BUILD'N'37 SETBACKS SHOWN HEPEON ARE PER THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPA TMEN�T OF I I Loll; . f. _. - i , 0 0 . . I z _-..-,� I �� t Ul) 0 . I � It t 9� - S" . . . M - f'�, I I . . I .-_A� I COvMUwTy DEVELOPMENT. D I I'll � .1 � . - , b (N I 0 - __ - - . �73'____ __ � I 1> 3 v) ' � �///////Z�, -11 �-�,�- . - 0 W .-_-_� ) - NO' BUI R ROACH OVER PROPERTY LINES, . , � I ­ .- - � 11 . . I . I F - -- (4 W _J f SH WN ON TPE �.A__LtL___ __ ,.I I . 11. I -,----.-.,. . _ . I I . I �: ?: M . . EASEMENTS, OR BUILDING SETBACK LINES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY 0 U ;f q_ �.,_- � . � -1 . V) . I 242ND Sr SW .A.A-% L . . _ - -.%.. I . 1 L 'it . : . -P-4 ___NF 2k.L - �.­ . - �1. L tL __ 7 � . - e- . . I . . SUP'VEY DRAWING. P_11,� _�. .. ... . i;h � _- I I I - I _J _J I 1 2 _ .1. 1. .:1 - 0-A � . I ,� I ­ 1)�. - k . - % a. a. _4-." . . . I -.-- 11 . . . 0. . W." - 1S 1. - *: . , It . THC . �Wx : . -­ I � o I I . I I$. R = 35.00' 0 1 1 . BUILDING' Lor ,ATIr .J1 DIMENSIONS ARE AS M�ASIJPED AT PIGHT ANGLES F171KI, '. U � I I . -� .0 .1 . � . 4� 8 A .. ... X I , r-oft � I "11� tui� , . I 0 � � . . . PIE AT Pri'ITIriel' .. , wtu I .1 ­1 EL . . �,\). � . . .� .. D = 03'1 5'56" . CID . . PPOPEPrf LI 71 .�', INDICATED . I . . to I� 0 1 _"__� . 1161.0%.l d ... , ... ­,_ . . . - I � . a) I , -) r� r- . . . -K , , �. : I . . ' I L -, 1.99 U I . . . 11 .. �4 1 I .- i I UA �.' , . li� 11� ��­ . '11­­� - = ('111 STP1PED PAPVINS STALLS AND STALL DESIGNATIONS SHOWN HEPEON ARE AS THEY . .- I � ­ . - 410 1! I '�l,������������������������������� I _ Af-I . 1i 1".1.1. =ol ; T If � ,�, , I 'I� 11 I'' '' I'' � � 1 I 0 - - ROUND. OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE NOT MAPVED APE i� � ,., .X��, _ ; , I :, e . . , X -, I . - 72 I'_ - ALSO USED FOR PARKING VEWCLES. . I -<� : ! I 0 F _. - ! CD � <S! 4' ­ I f�166J_ - . It_ I :: I � . .1 r 0 q t;.. �_ - . . . Lf t- .� � 1, `11% C 0 I, - . - L .< ./f.., PAPKINS COUN-- STANDARD SPACES " I . .. II-4 1 ___ I SITE P�t 0� I - . 2-oa-', . In I IL -4 � . lo. Ill W . � HANDICtNP SPACES . I . . . "', I . � . I ,�., I 1 STORY . 10 " I - ' . - �- *. / -k TE L.� - �. ._� lkm� �fl... � W . LL_ b / BUILDING 0 . . I JOTAL - , .- . -- �_ Y, (A 4, (�& EDXTE DED GOI U B ,��P.) . . . 4 , . a: 0 tf q4 � - �0 Wk" 4 A I.,) JL Wkg.1 I ­zk W k, L'a 4 %F? E r . 0 LU I _____ � ( �,-( Q ( v � ­ .- '. .� C, . I I _,� ( V"O I = " C'l - t- . i .1 I. . � _ DARRELL J. , x " v�' I .1 I. . � � . . . I ' ' ' )� I r & 4� .7&- _-_ - ___ ___��_ - � � - --J7�- 4o­ . 0 -_ I Z . I NOT TO SCALE. - I FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION = C. AREA OF MINIMAL FLOODING, ACCORDING TO FLOOD i J - ,, - - :1 ( (I In, w . , � . I U_ 0 - _J * I I .1 _. .1 - .�, - � , , I" I.: I i. . ". - . .. . . . � ­ . ­ . ,-.. * I. ­ . W :1--k. , -z--, .. � - . :,- . . . * ' I �­ _­ . � . . - I 1: .., .1 1. __ _ '��' ­ .1 I I ­ ..... , , , - :'.......-I.. I I .. I ...t 0. _ S, 1- I N ­:.. .. .. � ��- - -3NOHOMISH COUNTY, , I 7 I . . .. -, , ..I:,.- . I , � , . r -0005-D, COMMUNITY NO. 530163 (CITY . *Mwg 1� ft WOW, ��,W(29 1 0 1 �_ . . - I , - - _.. ,; � - * - -�, OF - * , , , . I - ­ �.J... -� " - -,. . . � � . , , .1. .- G , , "' "" " 11% 1. , _�_ I EDWARD N 0 )OW 1 1 . . I .: � . ��....�.: INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) NO. 530163 . I UJ 10 - :. . . I .1;. 7, 1� 'p. �;­� - . --r' - , .: . . ­ , . .: - , ,A_z� . 1, . 0 �1, - I I . I � .. ..:� . . 1 �,:7- ��': :�, . ... ­-,_�! �. IS. _�... �. ... � . ..w 6- ,,:. , '..., -1 !� . , .. ­ ­ �,'� - -�EDMONDS), PANEL 0005, SUFFIX D, REVISED FEBURARY 19, 1986. . . .1 ..I. -_ . ,­ ­,-."--�., _:..__,,�., V. .-,�.-.: m . , I - __ __� - � L s V - z � I 11. . . . - -1 r:.,1,.'- ­:'�: , I . ­ �- ­-.1'...­ ­ . I-_ .. � - . ­� � .., - � .. �_ � , 11­.-� . . .... . , . I . . . . .. '.� �7 _� ��,­ , � , I ". -, . _i - -.�.,�....:...��.�.I.:�,�'.�.-', :,�_%...C.- ­_­ - �.� - . - I .� e, - - .- I_ I . I .., , � - --­:�-- 7�- , . , , , ; � ., �.. , ,It . , ___ *� ';_�i­_' 1. , ... � - - -,- �­- z - .. � . __ - . - --- - --- _­ I . , � .�. .. I :", ... �, _ -, I . - I � 7 � _.. � %_ . . . ... . ''.. I � � " �", -, . -- � fum I - .::_1 .. � _ .:. , . . . I , '�' "' - . . ;.!.­,.`t: ., _� . . 1 119, . . - e - 11 . . I : � � . - I I - . .. � �. _.. . , . owmw�kwl*%w LIGHTEINWALD x *1 - __ . . . :��,.� tv,� . I - . � . . . , �', ,.: - I.",;. . � , . .. . ON, AS PREPARED BY THE r'EDERAL EMERGENCY Y (FEMA). I . - I .* -.�,:::, .. . , _�, �, - - I �, , . . - I . ,. : � . . '. I... - D �i L) . ,�A ,:,; , � , 1 �: � f�7:� � . _1. - * .. I I - ., :, . : . � � , . ­ , . -.1. . �, -, - - . �., .. . . . ­­­_ _ - �� � - - __ - , :-� :. - �� : " . . , ` `r` _`� . i- , . . . % . - . " " ' � - I ­­ It 1. ,. � � . i.. ..: - ----.-- ...-. - .0 - . I , . �: : . . . . . - _ . , . -,"- _:�': -, .-. �.`�-�, .-' - , . , , . - - `-, a SLC��,-, j�� �S�c i A . I -.----- - 0_- ­. - 150, @ go, I - _ - . " -�_��_-,.. I , ttl.. 1 .�­.',-` 7A:_1 -,:�,,� -�, _­ �-,�,�:� -, , _. ;., , .. . .. . - ­ _ "...'. ­ ­,..I�.�---_ ,,:� ..-,-.,. �'..i . !,*,r,., -��, ..­. , � " . . . .. ­ . I �_ ..:­� 4�­­_­.,�, * _,:",i_�,;,�,,;=- ': , �� _� I �.`, .1. , I - - -­­_ � , � ' ­`1 .. ­ ,�­" " . � ­ � , I " . ..., ., - ", `:`,�,-_ _� t. ,: , � " _�A � . . � .. . I I - -­�- -­� .. '--� . --- - - . ��4 mus _. I , .W�:. ­ FA6F_''� - ___ - - ...�� .­ � 1. . . . - -�� .. -.,.:, . P. IS �s ` 'S � _. X.­­­­ -1 . 1� 9 . I � I I '. _., ��i.. -�!­-.-�-L-1, --�.. .::.. .'. 7� . -, . ___ - F'1755�7�_6w, . , . ..', 3� L 11 � �. ....1. . _.. - � :::.. W� ­ I � ,� - , , I k! ti., , . Y, k. ,' L' � . , - - -��-.-,.,:.,�.'�,��.-..�----".:�:%�,���-'U'nLITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY EXIST ON THE SITE. UN')ERGROUND . , . . . ot :,.I 110' 0 90, I . : . ,�.'. - �' � � . A ­. -.-,., ,�­�, ,� ,..;. ",,_- ... .1 ., , _ . v h suff*cr" W10i L", --.-- I i . . ­ � , . . .. I .. , , ': - � .'� ___ I:_ .1 r: .. I . ,�-_,�-.:., -_:n: �,.�-�. � -,, ' - ­ -. �, I � .- � � . �� ., - ... �. .... _ ... . � . . � �. I .. . . , ­_ I . , - - � _��,Z:-��-��,`, ,�` "' �UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE TAKEN FROM A COMPILATI'N OF PUBLIC �v. tk- -"-%--- - '--- '- . , %- .. - , _ -, -, .. - - - - T `c�.'- .. ­ � -�...-;.,�.-�,�.*�.-��-.-!..--�', � .. .. .:� !_ - - . . . . '. I , "o, ��46LV "s ik " A '. - - ­ , , - - ___ 2.0 -_ . �- ­�.�� , . ­ 1 I—: ­­ I - - 40 I - ­ ., --lummv - �.� 4 , I T . - - - �; -'- �D te "%D 6 � - - �* . I I � ..,:, ­�: t-'..'_NM=vW . , _. ".... 4,� I ! _:'­.- :-: , - ;­.-,� :, *!,, . 1. . .-.: _;;� �.,,,,�. _- :: �­, : , , . . . , . ---- __1 - - - - - - - ... , � . '... ., - ­ .... �,- I I , " .. �. � -­­ ii­u: - -.: .. 1: - �. ..'.. ... 6 I . .�.- , . '_,� AND VISIBLE FIELD EVIDENCE. WE ASSUME NO LIAE31LITY FOR THE i. . ;, I:— � .. � .. . . ­ �!"�_,?,%'_._ , - . .1 _ , - ,...... ,�RECORCS I:_ .. .... . - . �, - ` ";-- -,�.,-_.";�_ _, . . ,� - -,- ... .. ­ - � ,�, ... 'ACCLIRACY OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE C NLY ,. ... � S-61le W to S11(cav i Vat. (W �21 U111 >1 . I N 88-26'17"W 179.17t --7. I � �,_ _ '':,�w �� �'..!.� �,­ -�_:� � - .,�_i, - fo* _ �. ! �,X� " . . : 6. .. . '' _...I. -I ,.-,I - ­ � I �.­­ ­__.- - .. ­.._ ­­­.. . " -, � ,_ ,., . .-I., . - _ . S. LINE OF N. 384' OF TRACT 4OT . �' �. �.;z '7, �.s !­,.'... � ­1�:. ,��. .. . I—— . �, _. . , --,-. , � -, -- , ' . , - . . g�,_ '. ... t..�..� , ;;,., � I. " ­­- ­­�, -­--�,'- - -­-, -.-:.;!,��-.-.t:��.s��.�.';'�,'APPROXI MATE. UNDERGROUND. CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN AS STRAIGHT LINES . ..M- � ­ . .. I . , . %� .. ..., W.r , _ - - - , - - .. . ­ I P. , ­ " . d .. , " . , .. �. . �� _ I I . " . -, 1. � .-.. N ., I I - - , � . -, �­� '. _� I C �:­ .. '. ..: . . ,�� .. "' ­.' . 11. 7 ... �, �.. ". . 1� .. .. - I , - , * , I. ... . . , -:, .. ­1 �. - � -_ I te T % �Iq-m I 9 tAfA I � moo . , I I . . ­ . , . -.-­� " - --.' _. ., _ . .� . 11­ . . ­ .1 I'll, ,� `�--"*7.._* ` -ACE LOCATION� BUT MAY CONTAIN BENDS OR CURVES NOT (W) P 0 S ugm 04 I I I I I .0.. .. -,� --.,_,.-:Q.­ . , _�_ . � , �t* � .�:.. , ., 0;4�'­ . _ . It . ��, - -, -z----2.T,!�.-i--i - .�� v- - � ­ . ­ . - �:!,�.,.,`��, ,--., ,s,-�2_ _ 7 >< JOHN E. I I Q�. . �:,� s.: ___ . �" : ,.,: �.:. ..­.-,.�",.,i:�< � -­..','_; . ­�., . I - I . . : .4 I.. .. �., . _ , .", I . �'; - . 1. . � -� . - 27;�l � -, _. 11 T --, I , � �.. 14I�..�,-'�.: � , . . - I v , ,� BETWEEN VISIBLE SURF S4 - mtstkmt . . . .. . � " �. . - I - ,_ .. ,:.. . 1. �.. , ­ - - . . � . ;1 - 01. -- ,�,:z�:�. I MAXIN, JR. . . ­ . , 1:.... .�.-. ­ ..:..; !.�..._ .,:.*, �...'._'11_ : ".., - I - 7� ___' -1 - - 1. . _.. . ,. . Im.zl:, � - SHCW-4.. FIELD VERIFICATION IS NECESSARY PRIOR To OR DURING ANY . _ I_ _'_ _"._ :, �.. .�. . z_.___-..,-"'�'__1_ .� .- . _ � . . , I ,,"r'* ,,.��:�!,!W., .. ­ - __T1 .. . : --, L .."". , -: - .--. _. ,.-. - � - _�� y .�, I ' ol . � . .1 .,- . '.. _ . .. w�M ­. - I __1 , -, , ­7 !..I .� . �` :_� I X - - . -. ­ .. �'.,�� : : , .- -, ` _� ,:, -..:'..�'. .--.�. - .­�� . I , 0 J\q%w1bu6 NSL85 Aft Mp �)w W10at " & . . .., .. � �- s�,_� .- � ., ­6 I-.11:14._-, '. ,� -_r.�.-. ­:� .-_��,-,-,:Z*. I I I .. �� 'L I � , -,-1... ­ � -rRUCTION. . W 1 40' . . ­ . .: �.. . �­ , - -11. .. .. ,­. 013T.":1 , ­C014S '. - ­�­ - I I ''.. -Z - ,__ _ �, I,-,' W* _'r., __- � . - I . � - - I - I L � M �L I . ... . �:. .,"..,,,� , 06'. -� ­; I . . - - - ­ ��-,A,L­.., .-- � :,� . �."'_'.*_. � * � . .. � r. . - ­ r ­1 _ I . . . : . ...­ ­!�­, ­.....-V; �� .. ­ T, , 1, � - ­ - --.,-, __ . - � .. . ..__� - - , .f. ­. :, _ �,­- ." - I .. ­ ,�, ­--� � . . ': ­_ .. _ .1 ef - _ - . ...., ' .. _ � X.- _TTE . . . f. � 11.1 � , ' ­­ v m, . I � � . I .11 �- . '�' - . � M111, Te, - � _11 . . . M . � � (Em"61 1`0-0t3 JANET BARBARA L. WHITE ..'� - . ...-.�: - t., .". 1. - , _ _ W. .. . .- Z.;,_ � .1 � � .� . _' �.. r . � _ � I _:­', Lr - _. � � _ � - - %. WRATHALL I ., . .. 4, r. ,- _ _ �._ ,_i,. is _. . : � 1. OV � .- .1 . I I . .. - 1, 7. �'. ., � . _; __ � � - .: . � .. �.' _ , M 1. ., _;� - . .. ,�; . r_ r ­ I . ,7 ­ ­_ 6 , _��:-, ,.,, rr, . * - " , " - � - - . r � : Ot K . TOSCO CORPORATION 11 _. � t. V., 1 k, .. � .. I I . � . -.�!�: p :; � !�. _­ - - . 'r I . a rub Khw*5 10 ftsolwlw� MW LINe., I . _... � . ff ­ � 1. ,ST '. r; - . I ,]a ... _. " -_ _ -i , :;�' 11 .11 �-- I -f ­.. -6. ---t -- r � I . -_i�,, 01 - .-,. , * -.".71 . I.r. �. , - . --._;!!-- ,,_-_�__"_ . __ _J . � I . �. . . I - - wokw Q. 11 c "., , ..., S . lr�*n , -Q v .i 1, I I- .. �, - . . � - .. '. - :.. 11 ,; URVEYOR'S CERTIFIC ­ - _ _,­�­_r1..;*_..' , , .. .-:.. ..- ­ *7 --­.­-,- 7-�. -�,�.'- - 7 .." �.,..:."�%..��].. .J , .. I, ". , w.�­ -z . , I ... .. ,.. . '.., � �_ 1, .. � _. ­.,_ � .' .. . I - 'r Wrt-�`...- ... �, .. ,, � , , I "eE-r f*(��o 170 . . I .,. ., -. . �- s I .1. � . - J _ ­ .--. ­ -S -,� ." -, i Or -1 s- - * . '.. I : I * , ___, _ I . . -, I I ­_­�-_� - ., '. 1. �, ��.,k.', I .1 . a , . -r.. .� ; - "' . 1. ­_: %.-­.. _. �J. _ - - ,:e' -_ ­_�_-­ -.--- '-r -­ ' � - " ,­i -I -11, ., . I : �;:: �, - - �; :w. .117��W­ �. ,.O.�'.. %..., . ­ , r " _� ­ , , . , 1: ­Z - . ., . , - I I . . : � _. 14T: , . I , , " -. , : � . , 1 N WHICH 11 IS , . . .. 1. 1' C.;5 MM. NWWArt fD COM 0 _� �r 0 - I I . . - , . , P. 4 _'. _ � A .. : --�`_-'__-'_-.%_. �'�,*.�- , 1. r ,,, �_ _�;5 . - .; ,; "" . 7 ­:� � , I . - -- ,5i­THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY 0 � .. I 41 . - . . , ­ , _ .- � . ­ .. .'­,,��.��,�_,,t,!._ � . - '"O �. I , .. I., - - r . . . . . K" OK I �ft T tM. VC -Ad - 0 ?A I '- 10 W1 i Mae, M�7 - :�­: , r� " I .; . ­1 ..­.­ .. .­­�r?�,,,�. ", .. ., . r ..�,�.., . I , . . ,­ " - , . . . .. . . .r - i.. . �." L . . . . '.. ­1 -­.- - � 1�.:.,....:_­-­;. . ... '­. ..r. � .. - � Ir - ­ ­­ -i I amn . I 0 ., _�: *,: '. 2.. r. ,,..:, _ .. 6_ ". � -�: - � - : . . . . .._ . � ­ - . .. ,r:...,. ::� .:� � �, �� -^ - �� ,�% �."'�'- . ­­:_,�:;. _ . ,_ - L'��:�-,,, ­ .. . 7 � 1.1*,.t _': �� --f %�,; -M STANDARD DETAfl. I I r � :' �: � .. - - - --'.t ., : �7 .01 � , :".-.- � -,.. -'_:�:-""_,"_ --', _., TL -MINIMU ­_ ,: , _r�. - ­ ., . ,:� . I . . . � _ ,1 �.A , . ­� -vin BASED WERE MADE (i) IN ACCORDANCE WI .4 I . ­ , � , � , , :. �­ - , I - �,� . . . " . I ,_ . . . . �. . , .:. . . r .%-nt�-,; -, . -.,-. ... - ca" 7 Q . 2. .. .. . . ;1., � .1. .. � , I . � Sri Ta A. SR13: ­-r., OF A-cx-56MP)-� kf�Wi . : ,VEX.- - - "i Owml 111,11 WIVAIjI EVIW5(ve er "I ( V0014tutla"tel' 0 P, I ( ... 4.0..S�.,, - if __ -, wt*ftm J.q L-e � . . ­ � I \ , .., _ .�i*,. . ­ � . Z.:­ '. �­' - . :p � t� � .. - .,;, � :. . , . ^ '.. . :__ r, ' - , I - :-,. �. . :*.;­ -- -�--,_,_�,,t� - '. "-- �. �4 ,. �- I . .. . '�"tREQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA / ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS." JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ...- 9_kw I �r,L ��...,. �'. �t ,:, - � - �_ .. -.1, -.1 _ . . . , ­z- - : � - . - , . ___ -1 �, - , . ,":s ...:.1.`:�`.,.,_-_.: * ......,...' -P --T: �1 �-`,'­.-_ - - ­- ,� _ " . % . , - � " --:7 1 .W �W, ;'�`�.:1113� �ill : . - - CtIO'E.114- .V- - '-'.' � � . .:.""."�; . ., .'-' - -,--_-: �Kr - ''r AND INCLUDES ITEMS 2-3. 4. 6, 8. ­ . . :1'.., . . I-,, , � . . _ . : �,L ­" . -� , t ` -..*r .;,." :, � � . ­ . - 1z, I tl,,�T` - L ­e',�'�---,l ADOP-ED 13Y ALTA AND ACSY IN 1992, 1 . � '. 1. I.:=_ I .�, ..%�­�L-.��",. '�'014?.. -- -_01, -.-. - �_' '.'- TAI � ... . � �_&_ :.r F. . .�. - _... . . .. . ­ I � .!: " - I ­ ­ - - - 4� - la(����� � -_ Al. .� I : V_0_ I �r " ..' r �_­ - � .10 Cab "I ___�_ fl­ � _.;� � � e W_ _._��,._._ . _....­.._,,,!%JD...1..4� .... Z ...... ,75-.­_f %A). me w es, 5t4ao goes Ct coft., Mmf O'. .[�b_,..(.._.­... . ­­_­­­­t ....... I -------- __rl- _ -- iWfi� � � I ' - � ."...... _ _ - �t 1:r4,1 - ... �_ :.,.. .. _��. A.,*I'kAL: - � �* -, ,�­ ,�:."�....!.,*"�,�:,',-�...*,f�-�;.�'.,I 9, I—— - . .�. _k 4 I _ -, ..1.1_3W .. - , _.. I .;��.,z� __ - ___. - . - ­ - ': __ � _. �_ A . ­ ... 01�; I . .� . . . - , " ­7;­ ­ . t, - ,C.P '' 5. _' _. , * ,. � ­ � I ­ -;. t `,�-_-� ��-- � ­T', - � w� EOF, AND (:; CCURACY STANDARDS (AS . . . ­ I zw. �.... I I'.- � .., . . . �. ��­..� " .�. . , �.. - ­ .- - .. %, ': . ,' AND 1 1 OF TABLE A THEIR ­- .�,:­. .... - ".. � . � , � , - ., - .� .. , , ,��.L!'_ I a .kU _4h 1 1 - .. - .- -,-;,. _ � I � WITU .. . .. . �­ '..�� .,_-.::�. - . ,.� - .�:. . .� � - , : lbt,': , � 1. � . ' 'ICAT , * _`-A :1t � t : ' .. r Y_ . I I � _ '. . , �. :. 0 r .J� � ) $ow "� ,,_'r'r­, -_� ,*­_:*;", . , '. . . ,­ , 6.-�.� r 0- ',� �: .". .,.- K"*?.� .-. ­ � , ., . ­ " � .­ - .: 'r. � , - �_ �'"!;'_�' �::-��',_'.�,'ZZ-� ADO P-ED BY ALTA AN D AC S M A N D * N EFF*ECT 0 N TH E DATE 0 r TH I S C ERTI F . � � -.A.�`,', �'].- .�:,:__ _­­_ ': - , , !r , . . . .. :� ... . I 1. .1r.. .... " � . ­7 ik ION) 0 , .- � .. - , �­:� . . . . . . _ r . _- -11 - , . , - __.�:, ­­- ­��--,--.�:.�.'.. . .- - � _.�;:. ., . ..." , * , , ... ­ � - .. , ­.! 11 � ­'.�.-' ._ _ . __ - . ,., - � .. , -; , ,:�,' - �, ., `-�--, - . ...:.� 4 , - -:, - - . , : -�. "� I I I U --: - - '_ - , , _ . , . -,.:: 1.i4l, �, : ,' . -, .��-.',-,­� -I � _ . . . 1. �' �­�� _�`� - ,tr . I , . I .. I � . ­­ , * _,r - .;:.. F .: _­­ 111.:�� ., ' - !,;-.6 .. �6, ;t �. .. �% ,,,�-;. .,k� -b be I M - to - valul, I __�A � " ,_ . �. _"__4;U__!:�__�_'�___ 7"."O' - . ­ -�v oel.. Z_ �: :­ .., �. . , ..� _.r, _ _. �, Fn . . . , .. 't .� �w - - _ - M wl, ... , I I'll � , .. , ­­.74y­. 7.. .. __ 1­­­­­.­__'_.'_._ . 7 . '_ r . , . . I I . . , , 1.11 .. . 1: %. .- .. . ._ _ . � _ _ _ . _, W_ / . , * 1__­.. 11 '..... 'i " . ,_.. * .. ' _ , . , . . . . . . .. . . � . . * --,.,- ': . . . . . . ..:z�*'. ., - � .­ . . " _ -- �' - - -, I - '.... ... � '7 I . I I . . . f'�r'�.-:­:,'� _,.%- , - At . I �, I I . _� - . , !.,: .��;17, ­_­­ . : , I_- .. . -.'. . . . I ! . I I 0.5,j�, __ .�:� - , :: '..'�,,,�_;,,.:.-.1 ' I -- ­ - - - - �_ �.. I - � . . ., . � ., . . r - . . . , � , , - - - - _ . . , . I . . .., I , - ­: -_ ' - .- .. � ''.. ."�`:­�i�t'-�' _. .. I I I I 1. ­ , . .-I- �*:!,�­�. t � - ­ � -.1. -_ .-. !- - �- ­ -1 .. .. , -, - �'- r * , " '"" " . . I;t . ,:�_.��_-��" 1, �:"� . "' .. .., . . ­­­­1­.WG01%y 2 , ­ - _ . ..., ,! .. . . ... .­1. .. .. . .­­. . - ` I.. ­ . '11:� .­�­ �.. .. . . 1. . I . __­ - mt - ., ._ - . ­: . . I . , - , ... �, __ = . _;1 , " .....', :""' �: - � r ­._ r �.... . � ­ia ... -,.,.�:l ­­ .r� � - _ _ roval procem shall be 00t ��, . . � . �­. r- � �- - - _ .. . 1. "Nothi -iis permit app, _0 ... __'. ­..­­­­­r­ ... ­­­ _____...__­_­ --------- ....­ .... I ......... ..... . .... ­­ ()i - qP.. 21, 2,-:..� .. .7, 1�,r�. I._._ _� I .;­, *'_-�.:__,'_,;__. �.. 7 �'_, �. * --, ,­_�`:`, ..... - 4.`­ ­��_.. , _1'1�- *7 r. . : ..... . !..�:%;..: - . . , _... - - - - .� . . I;m ng in tl - , - M. IK _____..,_,_v . , r. :. .1 . � - - ., I � - A __.. , . . _;- -,� - ."�...:,:., - ( - - - - .. � ... .y ...s ;.v,__,.1.._.W1_ -0 -+-4�-U- ' 'A5­ la" . _ .- " - - -- , As . .. 1,0 .- � , _ _ I - _ . . :,. ., . � - --, _�. �: �t . . , . :.' %Z . - ...-.-%., ­� .. 11.,_'. I . f�:'�� 11 ,:., . r .. _., � .. r (� /, .11 . a . .- ­ ­ _­ . - __ -- ­ -----.- : � 0 (A. I I . r , � I., --- - .., --. .... .. . , .� . ..:,� - : , J. __ a� - -) ;�b_ / __ ___*,_.ts _ . _bl­ tut . ., _ ., A . interpreted as allOWIlig or permitting the � _ -..,, ... '. I � - . : _...._ _�7�, _.... . - :�­:.. . � I . ::� .: - -., . .11 ..' .'-. ��:` .. �,' - - _�az - �.f-42LtL/-&-; I f �f I �. -W . ....... . SY. , _. _ _. . .. 1. ., . .�: , ,1 r -, .­% I .1 . .,-,. - I � , .1 .4M., . - - ­ - _.. .I _ r . � I.. tow -,w rJJ - ­­­ � . .. " _ r .. - � .". . r ' .1 .. 4 �_ ... ­ ­ � . : . I ; -�,.,. ­_ , .." C�4TE . - � . ­'.... . , ... .. 1. . of : �. : .rS - , . . - .. ,1 , : _': � . . _ -� , . . . - - ­:� �D S. STE�A[)MAN, P . � _ .1 . , - , ** . .. t , . - .. . - ' . 11b* I . .:; '.r - **** - - � . - . . I .." ­_ . ,- ., . � � "..��:... , : . _ . :.!� � ,.. , S t ,�; , , , ­ � . .r: -,.,,.. '.:.­:_ �', , -��..� "';�* �-, -- -, � .- - - - ., - - " .., �.'_­­. 1, '. 1, - _. . - �.,­-­ ,.-,RL _ �� : :1 . maintenance ot'any currently existing illegal, . ,,(,t ce, , r . � z � -1 _. ­ - ,�� _-_­.-r­­-._­­ ... I—— - . . 11_­ � . , 5., :�.-_LUOI? , r A tuA, CO- t - � . _v oo . _I � _ ,� ­­r .... I ... ­ - M . . _ � - - - ,. . . -�­!-. %. . ­' � .. - . ... . . :,.-. --:. - _�% - _ �� I_ . ­: - - - .;�PRCw'::'SSIOkJAL LAND SURVEYOq . ----::--:::: �,r"14-,:_- I 6i ... ... A...0. . � . ! - 1 I .. - : . . , . ­ . �' .. . .� 14�1z6' .. t.. _, ._.1: � :_,�, . _n"._, _.-Z. I I - ... . . ­­:.: ., �� - - '. '' I �.. - ._. :��, .... 1. '. r . - � .; .�,,,-.., - - - '­ - - ...i.� ­ . . . . - - . - . :. '. , 4 , -t ,-, i­��:* � -,w'.-. ­;,­_�--:j�­. -..--.-­,-.-'�� � ,�. -'t . v --*"�Wr-��*._�_ ted building, structure * ­­ ... ­___1___.,_.._... ­­........., ... I—- - ­ . : I I ­ . .:.- ��.:.,.�. . .. " �. ' ' -1 r' , _.: _ . . . : . ,_ ! . _ I ... ,: .. -.,..:.. , . - � _" -;', !:'�` L I C E N S --- nonconforming or unpermit ­ AvAifi$_M. ­ . La -------- 11_­_­1 ---- I— . I ;� %. ­. �- �` �-- - ;. . 1. I'.- -��-,.::-_ .7 - ._. - r, - � . .... _: �r ­­..,r.�._:.K . . - -:,. �; i ­ 7' ' __� : - ... " - I _. 1. . �'.. .., �. '.. . __:_ �'.'_'�'­­:, . . , .r. . . NO. 20282 I *. I . . : ��. , :. - .. . � .1 . . .. ­ __ . . . . , "' , _ .. - - .. .. ' ­ .: � , , 7" . - ­­4) % � . � .r . � r. . . . I.:, , _ ._..'!: "­.._'�'�_:_. - I . .. .. . - _% W; &,,7.T * . . .. _iWq- AQ. ­ ­ ____ -_ �,. . . _ . ... � , _ , ,.,:;.,* I ., ­ or site condition which is outside the v , I ­. . . _ :r r,-� - . .. _. .... , . . . .... ,.I.. _E .0c'm WAr- hi - ___­��Iv.­w� � � �-. '.." - ­.... ­ ­ _ .. , "' "" _. -1 TRIO I * .i . :1., ;, ;t,!,,--- . . � .. _. I I . .. . . . II.S. _.... $,A --,-,Q. ____________� - .. �'­' .'r. � 1�- -­ __ . - ­ % ... . :.. , , _� _... . ___ ......... �­_­­...­­­ .­..­.­.­­ . ­ , .. � .. .. , .: ­ _� � :_ . . , . I _. ..., . ..... _ ........ �___ . ..... � ...... ­­­_­ -, � . '� . : � . I I , �. ,. _1 ­­ I- . I . . . . .- ;'��:�____ , ­ � .1.' - _` � - - ..f . ., , - . `-, , .. �.,.: . _ - - - _��'. r� ___�­ _..`_� _..r' . .711, � , - � � . _ .'.1 ..,-, ts. - -�'.. .- _. - . - _-� . 'L, -,..k, -,.w ­,­,�- 41' ­'. -­ . i6i�* I—. ­r I I., - . .:._...1_.-­.. .. ­.'..." .r I ..; a ; ... :�: .. .1 . . -q;;.- '' Sb` :.. _: *: .. ,_ ., . _ .:-.. .,:�r - , , .--::., I . termit application, regardles . .V� . I I .. Y, s of whether such . . -_ A �' - -, . _. _�. , . CV, . .,.,.-. f:�,.­.-­_'­'_­­.­---- 24-4TH- ST. S-W-31 I 10 - - .1 _Ir T - MI, � =A' AWa,k_-_,'-T_-__9LiA'�'. - I .. -P - . - � :ope of, the -1 k-, - �-. �, 60. - q .. � - _.. _. ..;: t, " _,�� I '' r. . � J .. , I , - W". ._,_�. r ­. - . ..-.. ;*., .11 . .: .. �'-../....: . � � . . If. . - . 1. .: -­ , -I'. -, . ­­ %4.1 , ­ � r. __. . -, - � �. . . , I, - ­­ - -� - -:: . . �� , �., �. .. � .. . _ .. .. ., :�r . .. .. - .. - 1. I .I �, . I . -i . - -,V Uilding structure or condition is shown o I r , , I . ..... r - .... '' , . . ­ � 11-11. ... ­....__ __.._­_....___­_.. ­­­ ... ...... __,­_,­'t_­,­, ­­ __ . .: "... ­ . ., .. . . ' ' '" _� ­.: . , , ­ .., I ­ � �:. .� J. .� . :. .1 �t . .r I _ ­ , �� I - . � ... I.r. .. �:.:- , - . (U .: . .1 - I . ­­­_ . ...... _­ '. '. ­ _. -- * -:,�,. .., �;,*-. , , -, - � , , - - .­_,­­_ 1-1 ...... ­­­.__..._....­ -�(;� ,(a: .SL.00:� 'r _�� :� .. " r - 0 -_ _01 � ...... ­ ­ r ..., �. ­.1.1 .... ­­..... - I— - : gv - -� ��..,S, pa �. , , n the ­7-13&�)Wj\ )I--.-- I ;) -1 , , . I , , ­' , * , * ",_,':�:' _ � , . :1 - : : . . . . I .. . . .. . %_ . . . r ­ - , site plai or drawing. Such building, structure or ___._----.�------..-.----.--....---�.-�--I . ........ ..­­­r'_­'­ ­­­­­ ... ... . ­ . I ID S� r . I r I . . ­ . . . . . � US 0� �[JL . . . ... ..:..*. J'_._,.,'..r'-.1 . . ,.­��,,. , I . ,:, - ­ .� % &R ftr �- . . t , .N _.? - * ' _.- . . . %, .� , _ _ _ _)__ .- - -M I . :4 ___ I ­ L r z ? _ t-1 M _ ... , t � . r . . Eft . :--` ACM � ,NC � h b - :'..".­. ,5*111.'��r .z,.",�-.1.... ;.-_.�"_:�-..­,:,., -'- : ;­_.. I . . . � �-,( . . . �.. ,_, 1 g , be the subject of a separate - ' ! �.. - .,. �v - ­ , , . , ., ", . -:6� � , ­ . _�­ � .! .." �. . .y. . . �. r .:' , . " �. � .. . .. � ... I I , i . � I .., .1­ I .. . , . :. ., : _: - r _. : � I , C. p ��, r� � r I . . . . m�, �� '_ . ­ � . , 1 . . - W_ . - -7 i - . -1 - - '.171f-' .. - . . .. �.. ." � - , � , _.'�­ ... � ... ­­.­& ..1. , . , - - condition may -�- - %, u6i /, _ N , i, , , . , \ . I _,�_*_ r ' .4-1 q+ .­.­ �&' I - M6 ... (�J C�WVI N (J 060 44 * D -P � - A - .- fj-(..- � o_t/ � . . 'r r � - . I enforcement act ft- __ � * N . .. J 0 .- ., ( - , 0 . 4`1 . I 1_ , .., _ _ * : , We� '.. , 6 A 6 , , , .r. 0 .0 , _ . S4� . ZME - .- � " ion." �� r 15f;n, , - q : 4_____ 1 . _.­ . . . . . . - � , __ '_7 � 0 Im-"I E--q �� �� �� _e� Cf) M �4 (n .. E-t'i �_ot"I �4 U) �4, C� -O!� �� ;,.� 0 . . �� r\ _�, P4 . T-i 4e), 4� _4� 11 - ��, ,� ��7 C) _( . . W K_ I&I - �c . 12 J 0 () 0� LL oo i� , I z 0 _3 I- o Lj- 1`44 c:: Z �W M (Ai a W I ZiE I . . C� IX ()o I - - - - - " W . , I , E;:?! SUE I I b 2 .; in E;tn I HEIGES L9 -i . bco . . ':2'9 I I . . . . I I , - I 1(�ic_ . ALAN A. & NANCY G. WENTZEL JOHN R. .­ . ­4 ­ ..tv .... Wino - --. -­,,� --- �_ttottI .. I 0_ K", 61I� . . .� �> , I . _..... .'�." "P.- � . . ­'�..'..'.��,:�. - �.4 ______ _ . 1. I.. ­-Ww- . . _­ lt"xi I$ ; I. , - I �-� 0 --"*N 4!141 ,at* I "10 M4, UJ �; z M * JOHN R. 114 LU J >( . zt �- Z) -00 UWJ . z 60- x 0