24329 HIGHWAY 99.PDF11664
24329 HIGHWAY 99
0
ROUTING FORM , eo 9
4YAal Date
lack Jltc�a[L-
RE
elVED
n I I
mu u
— lr� I ld I u
31. VQA4' Ed=
Is fngr. Dept.
'00'
14.
5.
-10
essage: ILP
I S.
ALgml o4 m" mpad Igor WSACP
A*S 140dr r
Ire
From:
Date:
'E-7-7hsel�
7
WAINC. r-&c 60016ye,'s
e-)0*w, 7�
---%7 ---
TO
9IN46OFFICE COMMOWATOS C'UT-:'
SR 104 and
Bill Blume Commercial Filese�,
SUBJECT: Driveway for Bill Blume
DATE August 25, 19 75
FROM Bill Nims'
A field inspection and traffic study indicated that Auto Carrier Vans--
60 feet long have difficulty obtaining ingress and egress to the subject
property. The State Hwy design plans show a proposed 30-fdot wide drive-
way curb cut. The big rigs will block one lane of thru traffic attempting
to gain access; therefore, it is recommended that the City authorize the
State Hwy to proceed with constructing a 40-foot curb cut with the additional
10 feet being located on the north of the existing driveway. Also, the
bus pull out should be extended north beyond the subject driveway.
14JN:mjr
Attachment - map
GE1 ' STER R. DimNN=
ILRS�TR EUMDING
115 Fouu� AvmNun So�
H-0-8, WASe"N 08020
PRO�m 6-0189
September 26, 1973
Mr. Leif Larson, City Engineer
Edmonds Civic Center
250 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Dear Leif:
RECEIVED
SEP 27 1973
Edmonds Engr. Dept
Re: Bill Blume Volkswagen - Garneau
Estate - real estate
On behalf of Bill Blume Volkswagen, we
would appreciate your help.
The company is in the process of purchasing
property formerly owned by Mr. Michlitch (Monogram
Lumber) just north of 205th on Highway 99, and the
property just east of that, which last property was owned by
Mr. J. N. and Laurier Garneau.
Actually, it is all the property between' -,the
Bill Blume Volkswagen complex and the south line of the
new access road of the state highway SR104, where it
adjoins Highway 99.
Our question is, does the City have water,
gas or any other utility line located thereon, or thereunder,
that the Blume company might damage when it begins to
16vel or grade the property?
We would appreciate hearing from you in
this regard, at your earliest convenience.
Very tr3A-)-.r,,YOu s
CHESTER R. BENNETT
CRB:lre
qq
ADDRESS: , j2
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS: qq_4,;� q Z_ 5-3 ff Z,?Z &jQ(V_e_V 04--'10 -6-5- �Uawz'+-
DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver [] Study Required klWaiverx
K/a, (VZ.-r
ac #'S: P13 -
Z!� Abb - c5
510
AZO -
/b/
Am - I qg F16.
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEM[ENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS(OTHER):
d f-3 -03b,4
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: lZla�,I)o 7ko
11L
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
—LID#:
SHORT PLAT FILE:
LOT:
BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: , 911,P ? J4�4,')SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
I
SOILS REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER: A0.6u.- Zg - 5/5- 6/-/
LATEMP\DSrs\Fonns\Sft-eet File Checklist.doc
/08/00 14:36 FAX 4252582932 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
0014/015
'310 - Fallawl
"UREE"T FILE
CHICAGO =Z MSU&-,NM CQWM;y
EXHIBff A Escmwti.' 53.0-777
LEGALDEkRIMOK
7UUa=fin-odWii$iUWediithcSt4tco(WaahmigcmiCOWWOf�AUGIIOKISR andi&d=nbcd
as kAlav&
PARCEL A
TEAT PORTION OF TRACT -17. -tAxE-"CALRER_-_S �2— TRACT . ACCORDING To Tax pL&T
THZFIW RECO20ED' XV:. -SlOF-PLATd' PAGE tat RECORDS OF 800HOMISK
COUNTY, lmsKnmr=, -LY=G EASTERI'Y'OF TfM-EA= LIVE OF PRtHARY STATx
RIQHWAY -NO 1. COR-991 AND. uynio. souTEEkLy. CK, sR-3,04. AB ACQUIRED BY THE
OTATE OF *AcnixGTW By DECRUZ TO XPPROPRIKTION 1972- IN-
SNOHOMISH COU= SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO 10393C.
-EXCZPT THE -CUT -51;*6 -W= -OF -TZE'GOUTV I=F Mr TAID TRACT 171 LZSS THE
NORTH 75 Pk;u THEREOF, AND
six PT -PGRTZOMS--cawArM To *THE -SMt=jDp IMEMMMaWn AND SWROMISH COUNTY
FOR ROAD PURPOSES UNDRR*R3CORDZRc NUMBERS 336616 AND 603299
PARCEL D.
THE NOM HALF .09 .2RACr.A5, -TAX XCALCER .5 ACRE TRAC7fi, ACCORDING 7%) 779E
PL&T THEREOF; RECOROM nT W=M 5: Oir PLATT, FAG&-410. RECORDS OF SMRQKIOH
CoMrff' _-MASUMTON' XITING -G*UrB=M-Y'.VT -AR4104 �28 -ACQUIRED 19Y THE STATE OF
WA`SH'NG=:!by'DgCREZ OF- APPROPRIATION- BUTERSIV APRIL 5, 1972 IN' SHORCmSH
COUNTY SUPERIOR. COURT rASE �W_ 1 00S 3 .-MM -SY -CCOPRE OF APPROPRIATIO"
�Z-HTERVV DGCZM2R 20, 1974 in sugWagn COIRM SUPERIOR COURT CASE So
109117.
PARCEL C.
THE NORTH 7S PRET-Op MM.Sot= vtxrj?..ojrXjtACT, 16, LAKX�MCALMRR__�_ACRR
TRAL"Si ACCORDING- TO M.-VIAT TRBREOF, RBCWED 10 VoLtm 3 OF PLATS, PAGE
48- RECORDS OF SNOMOK1611 COUKTr, WASHINGTON,
EXCnr THE 'SOUTH 10 FEET OF THE EAST 95 PBST THIRROF
PARCEL D
T= W85T 9S FEW OF TIM EAST X90 YZET OF THE soVTH.Z�u OF TRACT �16, LAKE
NCALSER 5 ACRZ TRAM, ACcORDnfc -m-THE rLKT�THwuwv, RECORDED rN' VOLUM S
OF PLATO; PAJM'42,. RZCO=& ar'SNOIRMSH COUNTY. WASRIVMN,
EXCEMTHE WORTH 75 FRET. AM
ZXCEPT PORTION 'WW� To -A'XKMM V=4TY IM 'HOM UNDER RECORDTNG NUMBER
583299
SITUATZ IN THE COM17Y OF Stf%MXSH, STATE Op VAOgINGTOM
1.9-99062 50 6 0 4 -
CHlCA0O=ZMUMM==WANY
141
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAME,NAME OF BUSINESS
VW
M
61,mp—
4-H 1112z-&&v
Z
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY zip
TELEPHONE NUMBER
'6�kW HIA& IWZ
NAME
70DRESS
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER
NA . MW1,Lcox, CoNvr
M
2
U,
ADDRESS
(23 A/.
CITY zip
a4wolvz).s
TELEPHONE NUMBER
'j711-e,4g1Z;
8
STATIE LIq9N$E,NUMBEA. EXPIRATION DATE
2m; -e-3,74.A)o
Legal Description of Property - include all easements
49 11-ab e-0 90-7
-0 2-
44�711— CW — 0 7 —0/ CQ
Pro
;.=- nt 4,711 -av- om-ozoo
P0641 No,
0 [1 EJ
NEW PLUMBING
ADDITION MECHANICAL
REMODEL SIGN
GRADING FENCE
CYOS.
REPAIR 1 x —FT)
W
1-3 DEMOLISH OODSTOVE SWIM POOL
INSERT HOT TUB/SPA
GARAGE RETAINING WALL/
CARPORT RENEWAL
z
ROCKERY
0
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
rc
Uademg-.:�jles &t1zg--g,
8
w
0
NUMBER
0 F
6)ffe-
NUMBEIR OF
0 WE
.L No
CRITICAL
AREAS
C,Q
.ES
U
NUMBER
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN)
All"iV /710A td/t,
1z,
000
HEATSOURCE:
NA
%
Plan Check No.
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY.
Any construction on the public domain (curts, sidewplks,
driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.
Permit Application: 180 Days
Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days
"Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, hel /Ali igns and
rfe and hold
successors In Interest, agrees to indemnily;Jd. nd
harmless the City of Edmonds, Wp6hington, Its officials,
employees, and agents from any claims for damages of
,fiAd'all
whatever nature, arising d1rect0i or indirectly from the Issuance
of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
C,
modify. waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
provision."
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the
information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly
uthorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and
tate laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authorIz-
ad thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor
Code of the State of Washl��relatlng to Workmen's Compensa-
tion Ins rance.
RE 0 NER A I
-
Z,5
USE
[ONE
PERMIT
NUMBER 9303661
106
1400RESS
/-//0vWr/1V
SUITE/APT
99
#
.EGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK
SUBDIVISION NO.
LID NO,
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP.
TFSCP Apprwed
13
Aw Permit Required
0
EXISTING
— AEOLIIAED DEDICATION
Street Use Permit Req-d
0
PROPOSED
ImPectim Required
Sidevralk Required
MEMO DATED REVIEW BY
.... ..hA
3EPA REVIEW
ADO NO.
ALLOWED
PROPOSE'
COMPLETE
1�3-6'
/�015 1�
21_
I 'S -1C
I
1EXEMPT
V
,
SHORELINE
1 r
'EXP
VARIANCE OR CU
EVIEW�Bk
77; r)
:�r/;ATE
f I/
SETBACKS — FEET
EIGHT
IT
LOT COVERAGE
FRONT /� SIDE 0
REAR 0
I
;HECKED BY I TYIPEOF CONSTRUCTION CODE EIGHT
�VWPY I q1 IH
SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCU PANCY .2 OCCUPANV
REOUIRED GROU LOAD
. . 0 YES
9EMARKS .
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305
FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED
VALUATION FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
WILDING
7
OLUMBING
MECHANICAL
3RADINGIFILL
STATE SURCHARGE
;TORM DRAINAGE FEE
'NO. INSPECTION FEE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
f7—
ATTENTION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
THIS PERMIT
This application Is not a permit until.
A UTHORIZES
ONLY THE
signed by the Building Official or his/her
WORK NOTED
Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is
acknowledged In space provided.
INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT
0 T RE E
aw
CITY OF
EDMONDS
Alsh�
W DATE/
"RELEAT
1,104LII. rvri
ATTENTION INSPECTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR O�A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE
UNTIL A F:NAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-0220 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — inspector
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC
CHAPTER 1. PINK — 0wr-er GOLO — Assessor
CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE
ZONE
7i
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
%4/
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS 1AAAAojj_1v Cf ADDRESS
930360
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP
Al ---
TELEPHONENUMBER APPROVED BY
E :`STING REOUIRED DEDICATION
PROPOSE
I
Aze 0q RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REOUIRED D
STREET USE PERMIT REOUIRED 0
Al SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEW BY
NAME w
ADDRESS
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER
� 1774/ - Z#8
§TATE LICENSE NUMBER
9 * �:; _07 ___& - OA - Ace 74, -,A/0
LAnal np.qnrinfinn nf PrnnartZ; - i—I-4, �Ii .
Arax Account Parcel No. -
IeE 5r7V P-"
NEW
0 PLUMBING
ADDIALTER
MECHANICAL
REPAIR
SIGN
El DEMOUSH
EXCAVATE, FILL
E] OR GRADE
FENCE
REMODEL
CARPORT
GARAGE
x _FT)
SPZML
WOODSTO El
INSERTV
RETAINING WALL/
ROCKERY
RENEWAL
TYPE OF USE, BUSINFSSOR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
4U70
14546552-V5
4UMBER OF STO ES
GUMBER OF
WELLING
UNITS
NO
IATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN)
SIZE
tNY, HEVIEW ADS NO
ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT F3 -
It/ 50.5:f 9 47. SMORELIN
arolor / / ZZ
VARIANCE OR CU PLANNIN5 REVIEW BY OATI
x
SETBACKS — FEE T HEIGHT I LOT COVERAGE
FRONT / )' . SIDE REAR ( 3 j— /,/(.)/70
%A
By
/1, Se _q C0/7c./ "/0
0 REGUIRED GROUP -, I
YES C NO I /A*,K 1 BA F�13
ARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305
HEM I
r IF I I Y L—w
FINAL INSPECTION REOUIRED
VALUATION
loft
PLAN CHECK FEE
a"e zj�gf,,,
BUILDING
PLU M SING.
Plan Check IN
-
MECHANICAL
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY.
Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewelks,
driveways. marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.
GRADINGIFILL
STATE SURCHARGE
Permit Application: 180 Days
Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Worh Is Started Within 180 Days
x
5
x
"Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs assigns and
successors In interest, agrees to Indemnify, defends.gdShold
0
harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, is official.,
its Officials
employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance
rSV
ox
of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
modify, waive or reduce any -raiiulrement, of any city ordinance
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
provision." anc
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
.9 'Lo'.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the
—
Information given Is correct: and that I am the owner, or the duly
ATTENTION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and
state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz-
THIS PERMIT
AUTHORIZES
This application Is not a permit until
ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor
ONLY THE
signed by the Building Official or his
Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compenea-
WORK NOTED
Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt Is
....... — 11
NSPECTiON
acknowledged In space provided.
SIGNATURE"NEFfOR AGENT DATE S111 NED DEPARTMENT
/I, RE
qzk CITY OF
Z0 EDMONDS ME A6115A&_
A17ENTIO CALL FOR 6 RELEXTED aj,.Z DATE
N INSPECTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE ____ 41'a—dJ;
UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-3202 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN' GRANTED. UBC
CHAPTER 3. � PINK — Owner GOLD Assessor
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial Proiects
SITE ADDRESS: Z, +3 7�), C2 9 ZONING:
USE(S) PROPOSED: nM2)2!Le I- 9-if-,aa-4 4,6,-N� ALLOWED?:
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED— A) (Y/N)
CUP File: IVA To Allow What Uses?:
ADB FILE #: 99-199
PARKING: tj-5 6*6't
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X
(floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Total Required: Actual Provided:
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 15 1 Left Side: 0 ' Right Side: 0 Rear: 0'
Actual Setbacks:
Front: (9 -7' Left Side: > 0 1 Right Side: Rear: 0'
Street map checked for additional setback required? ('A (Yes/No)
'0
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: IVIA
0 .
z
Maximum Allowed:
U !
-Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: 90,
Modulation Allowed?: 1Vf'4 Height:
-Modulation
Datum Point: N�" 42�m N6 Datum Elevation:
Elevator Penthousg > 3 feet over height limit? V4 If so,VAR#
0
LANDSCAPING: ki/A
4.
z
Matches ADB approved:
t:
Bid Provided? Bond Amount (100% bid):
r;
DATE: V10 / 2-M PLANCHK#: PZ-99-438'
NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: USOeil- IJ,"esC
Continued ...
1A1ibmryNAP1andatNewComm.doc
e
F4
z
0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: g
ADBFILE#: 99-0,f OR DATE WAIVED: A14
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN:
ffo i- � " 0/�'- - "�' V'-Vl 5 W1 ", 0'1� - WIVK � I,,'W-"14'
SUBDIVISION:
CRITICALAREAS#: 9Z-005) 175-065V
SEPA DETERMINATION: TW�- 12-1j411921
SHORELINE REQUIRED?: No
LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: Aj,,
REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5XI 1) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? M-,.,- - tgr
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
1Ahbrary\AP1andatNewComm.doc
CA FIL NO.
L40tical Areas Checklist 0
----------------- --------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
I . Site Address/Location: M.?� � I qqh!!t I q
2. Property Tax Account Number: 411k000-ol-i-ol.co-_
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): -A, o facvc-f
4. Is this site currently developed? yes; — no.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of
I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 3 3 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: A/A—; Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain_ of a.water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? Ath Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs. mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) '7A*01 * -
11. Obvious wetland.is present on site: &IM 47
-------- ----------------------- For:City ------
.. .. ..... .. .
:3.-: Wetland. inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site?
ri ica:Ar6as�:inventoiy.;QT:,Q,A..MAp indicates�:Critical Area. on: site?
......... . ......
.:e su si entell:: and
5. �it6 Within d t d drth b *d 1* Midd:.hazat&4r.. A
esi rige
91 .... .. .... ..
ite,, e inate&bmth fil I :. en , tv.,e . :eas'M
e1rivirwiffien 1 9 'sit' At ag,
..... ............... -
9TUOY-P
W A W;&R
k0jewed b34�..
'ca—chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97
City of Edmonds
CRITICAL AREASCH; ECKLIST
.11
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form ist.,
to be filled out -by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, 'or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant� or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff * in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described -on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent infor mation (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
el �4- A P5
Name
2,'W4
Street Address
�Vvo t_ �ro W qom
city State Zip
/19/)V111
Date
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
city State I I Zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
c:rccepflon\jana\cac1.doc
(over)
BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 4, 1999
Kurt Campbell
Carletti Architects, P.S.
2204 Riverside Drive — STE 270
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 99-292
Dear Applicant:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City
is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page).
It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records.
.......... .......
.............................................................. ............. :::: I .. ..... .......
................ ..........................
..........................................
.......... . ........ : ...............
.................... .................. ..........
................... ...... ....... I ................. I ..............................................
PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY.
The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas -Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a
project-specifi.c determination.
mio, You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL
PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED.
Permit applications include the following:
Enc: Determination
* Architectural Design Board
C:Reception\Jana\CRLTR.doc
Building Permits
Conditional Use Permits
Subdivisions
Variances
Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications
Any other development permit applications.
Thank you.
Planning Secretary
Incorporated Augus't 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
Jq 2- 3
RECEIVED
City of Edmonds
OCT 3 0,
PMENT
CRITICAL AREASCH; ECKLIST21TY OF ESDEMROVN'CDES CM
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is.�..
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data -available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
,An applicanti or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
Name
2,'W4 �wv,5Jt DWR, 5u_i �10
Street Address
�Nj �ro 0 q�m
City State Zip
10177-1-11
Date
Applicant Representative:
!�dye xe,
Name
Street Address
City State I Zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
c:rccept1on\j anakad. doc
(over)
W
CA PILL; NO. —1 -
Coical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
I . Site Address/Location: M '� � I qq�ej
2. Property Tax Account Number:
Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): A
4. Is this site currently developed? \'/'- yes; _ not.
If yes; how is site developed? 4OMPOWTAI;v
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of
I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 3 3 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing, water: AIA Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year? NA
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain_ of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? IM Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs' . mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
111. Obvious wetlandjs present on site:
-------------------- F
------ - or ty SmffUse'Only; --- - ------------------------ ------------- ------------
I. ... SCS rh.apped sqil:typq'(s)?:._
n inventory.....:6*r.C:A ihdi* etlafid. res6fti6ftsite?
3.. Wetla d. :nja :in icates w IV U.
4. r a ?:
:C iticifAreas inventory or.C.A..map indicates.CriticalArea on site /J@ ...
Sitewithin designi 'ate d:e: jilh. subs ide: hke'laindslide ha*zard area?
.5.
.6... Site.designated�on,the:E nWW,Sen�itive Ar ':Map9 D
ny.ironme. eas.
DETEP.MINATION
:STUDY:REQU:l CONDITIONAL. WAIVER-
J.�
Reviewed by
....... .......
Manner' ...... . .
te
'ca-chkAoc; Re� 10/03/97
FILE
Critical Are2LSCheckfist- 4�) 000 - 01
Site Informatio C2 h--&j ay e�
Pmjcx-,t Namc: permit Nwxbc;r
Site Location: J.'* Tax mount Number.
Approximate 3 fto Size (acres or s'q=N9f
Have you filled a -at a Ctitical Are= Ch*oldist for a projecton 4S &* itz before?
Gettend Site Conditions
L HA3 the site been cleared or loggo&9 17n -Dato of most reoent. =don:
soils I Topogmphy
2. In the Snohomish 0mmty Soil Survcy, what is the mazq4nd soil typc(s)?
3- t%--general site t0poScVhy. Check A that apply-
L// Flat less than 5 fea devation change over entire site.
A�l Rolling: slopes on sitc gencrally less dun 1511S (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a
borizontal distance of 66 feeQ
Hillir. slopes present on ift' ofmoxe th= 15% and less d= 30% ( a verfical rise
of 10 fcat of horizuntal distanm)
Stacr- grades of grCAter am 304/8 present -on site. -
Comments
Hydrology/Vegebation. -
4- Site containsareas of year-round standing wate.--
5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water- A-qmprox- Depth:
6. Sitc is in the floodway I---- floodplain of a watcr courso-
I Site contains a creek or an nrea wbeze vrAter flows ncxoss the grounds surface? flows.
yvaz�round? Flows am seasonal?
8. Site t9 Primanly- forested - meadow shrubs mixed
9. Obvious wetland is prcstnt on sitc: 41�)
10; Wetland inventory or map indicatcz wctland Prc3cnton sita
11- Critical Areas inventory or mAlp indicatts Any Critical Area on
7nn '47nn FRI AVC TYINUT T 'T�Y'V, -OPP ace AA7 VIVj 4111 - AT ea on &A
City of Edmon&
Ceitical Areas Checklist
nc C"WI 400= Choldist c m-ftkcd on
Oft f4m Is to bo filled ow by ww pemon
Dcvdqpm=t pmma
for &C City Of Uw=& -
to VM4= U*MfW of g
0 40 MY-. ,
"C FWPM Of&e Cb5ddist is to auble,
CiW sWffW &ftnake i&cffier =yPW=fW
Qif=l Mw am or =y be promm on &c
=VfxtFWX=W- IU W*mgao- -.dcd
should be anfly
avaagb% ft0M'0b$Mv2ti3Ons of the site *r
4=1 avaftic at MY M (Odfical Arcas
invcatodcs� nIAPs. -or swil surveys) -
An aMlican& Or hit&cr xqm;saxcaxiv� U=
fm out do cheali#, Z�V, and daft it, and
smbmh it to &-- City. The City vM =view
dw d=ldist, UMIM a prccumry sjtr, TW
$ad nzdm a dammin;ition of f1j.. sab.07imt
SkP$ accesary to complete a developm"t
Permit amlicafion.
VrAasWacdcopyorthisforin, the
appum dwdd also mb=t a vi=ty Mp
Of** Parcd vi* caough dcW dud City
I
liff9m find and idaiffy the suMo
P=Cl($)L in ad&OOM6 the aPvlj4;RMt is
cn*oqz tO ineIU& 2ny other Parrumt
informadOu Or sniffles in oonjunction with
�this Cheddist to assist staff -n 6=plcfing
their Prdixuinaxy assossmen: of the cite.
I haVC COMPICtOd the aftached Qitical 6,rm Cbccidist and attest ftt the =SwM provided -33�c
fiMlal. to the bca�cf my jm.0wj04g- (fill out gc appropiaft column low)
be
Owner/ Applicant
4/10 15 71 h,
Name
Tide
Street Ad&e=
c Lvz, ZIP
sig.�c
Phone
APPlicalmi Representsai,e:
4a'tl-re-1 41R,'77
Name.
Mac
�/.?- A-ve.
Stred Addr=
k)7��klol
tate,.Z'r - 32" , - , Am..,
TOO/T.00 In AUS MI T IUD' M9 69C 90Z TVd LC:9T ce/90/co
0
Critical
Site Information
Project Name.>,fAwt,"I"
a 415,
Areas Checklist
yr
Permit Number:
Site Location-'&)aer Property Tax Account Number-//
Approximate s " er$N'ee �2 -5-"- '4:�"
Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before?
"r
General Site Conditions
1. Has the site been cleared or logged? Date of most recent action:
Soils / Topography
2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)?
3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a
horizontal distance of 66 feet.) -
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise
of 10 feet.of horizontal distance.)
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site.
Comments.A�"4r',"//IX4�4cl""
HydrologyNegetation
4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: IV9
5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
6. Site is in ihe floodway 10-�' floodplain 40 of a water course.
7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface?A�flows
are year-round? � �PFlows are seasonal?
8 Site is primarily: forested I�W-' meadow ;shrubs mixed
9. Obvious wetland is present on site:
10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site:
11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates. any Critical Area on site:
----- — ---------- — -- — — --------- — ----- —For City Use Only — — -- — -------------
STUDY REQUIRED: Critical areas study is required.
CONDITIONAL WAIVER: Critical areas study not required if specified conditions satisfied.
'Z WAIVER: Critical areas study is not required.
Determination Number.. 5 Reviewer
Planner Wt.
Rev 3127192
0 -4 ---.
690 . 194 -
City of Edmonds
Critical Areas Checklist
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on
this form is to be filled out by any person
preparing a Development Permit
Application for the City of Edmonds prior
to his/her submittal of a development permit
to the City. e
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable
City staff to determine whether any potential
Critical Areas are or may be present on the
subject property. The information needed to
complete the Checklist should be easily
available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas
inventories, maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must
fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and
submit it to the City. The City will review,
the checklist, make a precursory site visit,
and make a determination of the subsequent
steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.,
With a signed copy of thi's form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
of the parcel with enough detail that City
staff can find and identify the subject
parcel(s). In addition, the applicant is
enccuraged to include any other pertinent
information or studies in conjunction with
this Checklist to assist staff in completing.
their preliminary assessment of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner / Ap I* t Applicant Representative:
Ale
Name
Title
YY J—
Street Address
/Wo-57-Al, 2;,Y-Ilyl
City, State, ZIP �PO,;20 Phone
Signature Date
41 —c- 12—
Title
9119 /<V--
Street Address
4
d1-2
S ilIZET V�"L
le-4 C V4
BbSIN DETENTION PI LENGTH CONTROL CATCH
(vr.t4-r) I I&ASIm
) I 'r— to M1141 2' MAX COVEP, --I . :7
OLrrL&T
CONTROC
SLOPE-4. 0146
4'
OUTLET
(PJ P RAP OR
;kUNOFF
SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 5 P R EAD E P.)
SEE PA.GE 3 FOR OUTLET CONTROL DETAIL
2' x 2' . &�' vv=r, 4t. & " SPALLS (Olt *9"1-)
2' so 3" DEEP, V4*— L;tus"rzo porK
F"
OUTLET
CON-1-ROL
RIPRAP OUTLET
WA3HED WRAVEL) f OUTFLOW TRENr-", MIN 10' LONG,
'4- pff" PIPE 'TO BE LJP-VWL
--a- 1 -7
FROM
OLMEX
CON-rAOL
4" PERF PIPE WIT14 CPP.S
R.UNOFF SPREADER OUTLET
STANDARD DRAINAGE PLAN
DETENTION SYSTEM
PAGE I OF 2
for CAM 19,6 kt - Aloeck -�d N
locationl,&jrT. v- 141 WAY '-/V—
li�--- A J,,AA.
plan by i�q- 4771hV 7-
phone.
date -
DESIGN DATA
System Impenn Pipe Pipe Orifice
Number Area Diam Length Diameter
=VR
M/M'
M
WI -A
MMUMMM
mmmmm�
mmmmm
NOTES
1. Call Engineering Division (771-3202)
for prebackfill and final inspections.
2. Responsibility for operation and
maintenan�e of drainage systems on
private property is the resvonsibility
of the property owner(s). Material
accumulated in the storage pipe must
be flushed out and removed from catch
basins to allow proper operation. The
outlet control orifice must be kept
o:p7en,t a times
V
MAY .9 - 1989
PERK. COUNUR
CITY OF EOMONDS
I
.1\10
lot
F4
'04 "Y
P^kKi?jg- AP-IE:A
p�-o 4 US E b C A Aj
C- A M,3 E 1- 1, -
Sr
"--V
"40"d
fV3 /7
141
ll�p
o(VI
Al
-I il*f -4/3
m
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Applicant Fill
ZONE NU . MISER 9z:t\ C7- 5-
F T
AL de Heavy Lines
-VERMIT APPLICAT196 si
JOB
ADDRESS
3,�
NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) mW
6LUMr_-_ VaLKj9AA6tr-_
1
AL LOT
ES El No
PLAT NA
BDIVISION NO.
W
MAILING ADDRESS
z
3:
-Z4
0
CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER ORDINANCE/NO.
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY _, 1091100
PROPOSED RIGHT OF.WAY 12yof)
N
DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY
W
ADDRESS
136
STREET/UTILITY WORK REQUIRED El YES CKNO
PERMIT FOR WORK IN PUBLIC R/W KYES NO
CITY
TELEPHONE NUMBER
UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED
LYNR 401Q P
CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER AYES NO
SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQUIRED DYES NO
NAME
SEPTIC TANK PERMIT NO.
0
ADDRESS
U
SEE MEMO DATED
Z
CITY
TELE HONE NUMBER
REMARKS
0
U
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
CITY LICENSE NUMBER
CHECKED BY
Lega
z
0
U
0
W
J
n of'Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copi
BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE
SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW AC
ALLOWED I PROPOSED 1COMPLETE1 EXEMPT* I i / / -
REMARKS
VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY I DATE
C_ u -
�-/,g - ?
YARDS
NEW
RESIDENT AL
GAS
10 LINE
. FRONT SIDE
FIRE ZONE YPE OF coNsT;
ADD X NON-RESIDENTIAL SIGN
DEMOLISH RETAINING SPECIAL INSPECTOR
WALL REQUIRED
ALTER EXCAVATE FENCE 13 YES C3 NO
r OR FILL E] (_ x_. PLAN CHECKED BY
ElREPAIR PRE -MOVE swim
INSP. E]— POOL REMARKS
__[UNITS
z NUMBER OF STORIES . NUMBER OF
0 r DWELLING
if-07:ZA01M WA
NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE
Ln IUAT 6�6 ffi&F--, NEW
W
17' IVY` F_ _AkF,-A PLAN CHECK FEE
'PROPOSED t2SE oF AuTv
PLI)T PLAN JINDICATE BUILDING SETBACKS,
ABUTTING STREETS BUILDING
U
W PLUMBING
0 MECHANICAL
FENCE
v)
vi "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and SIGN
W
-I successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless
2 the City of Edirionds, Washington, its officials, employees, and RETAINING WALL
Ir agents from any and all clainis for daniages of whatever nature,
I arising directly or indireoly from the is"13 rice of this permit. Issu- SWIMMING POOL
a ance of this permit shall not be deenied to modify, waive or reduce
_j
0 any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the
LOT COVERAGE
R.EARI .
CODE 1HEIGHT
OCCUPANCY
GROUP
THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY
OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX
SHOULD BE CODED 31.04.
VALUATION I FEE
0
!It
it
0
3:
U
m
m
W
-W
W
z
W
0
.j
W
0
V
11 City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision."
Il'i'liv;1ti"ll: that lite ill I"' �_rJal_ AMOUNT DU17
,or
Zed, 24�ZWI�
&
14dJOCW",
I&C,
ENGINEERS e SURVEYORS
- PLANNERS
Niam itri-el
e Fdmonds, Wishingtoti '180;'n o
771,413.1
Bill Blume Volkswagen, Inc.
File No. 4501E
September 27, 1978
FYHIRI-T "All
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR BILL BLUME VOLKSWAGEN
FOR. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PARCEL A
That.0ortion of Tract 1-7, Lake McAleer 5 Acre Tracts, according
to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of PlaLs, page 58, records of Snohomish
County, Washington, lying easterly of the east I ine of Primary State Highway
No. I (SR-99)., and lying southerly of SR-104 as acquired by the State of
Washington by Decree of Appropriation entered April 25, 1972 in Snohomish
County Superior Court Case No. 109936; EXCEPT the 'east 51 .66 feet of the
South 1/2 of said Tract 17, less the north 75 feet thereof; and EXCEPT
portions conveyed to the State of Washington and Snohomish County for road
purposes..
SUBJECT to easements and reservations of record.
PARCEL B
The North 1/2 of Tract 16, Lake -McAleer 5 Acre Tracts, according
to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats,. page 58, records of
Snohomish County, Washington, lying southerly, of SR-104 as acquired by
the State of Washington by Decree of Appropriation entered April 5, 1972,
in -Snohomish County Superior Court Case No. 108593.
SUBJECT to easements and reservations of record.
PARCEL C
The North 75 feet of the South 1/2 of Tract 16, Lake McAleer
5 Acre.Tracts, accordi ' ng to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 * of Plats,
paqe 58, records of Snohomish County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 10
feet of the east 95 feet thereof.
SUBJECT to easements and reservations of record.
PARCEL D
That portion of the West 90 feet of the,north 312.02 of Tract 15,
Lake McAleer 5 Acre Tracts., according to plat thereof recorded in Volume
5 of Plats, page 58, records of Snohomish County, Washington, lying southerly
of SR-104 as acqui*red by the State of Washington by Decree,of Appropriation
entered, April 5, 1972, in Snohomish County Superior Court Case No. 108593.
SUBJECT to easements and reservations of record.
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING* WATER SUPPLY *WASTE TREATMENT* SURVEYS G CADASTRAL ENGINEERING
AIRPORT PLANNING 6 DESIGN 0 MARINAS 0 PORT 6 IND'USTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 FEASIBILITY STUDIES
0
Z
IC J WORKS DEPkR1,, M- CRECKI-I&S Date
BUILDING VElg,11T REVIE14 ress
��JStr�eet Rig�ht-of�-14ay�axist�ing��iCi��lr/��'� �REQD
Access Easements Existing REQD
Utility Easement Existing REQD
Lot Plat Assessor Map
,,per,Subdivision
Site Plan Checked for Accuracy
Underground Wiring Reqd.
Check Accuracy of Legal Description
Envirorun-antally.Sehsitive Area
Environmental Checklist Reqd.
Flood Hazard Zone
Shoreline nmac,;ement. Area
Slope ' Soil, Vegetation
Stream, Creek, Drain. e Basin
Ex isting Zoning Per Code. —
Amenities Design Board Approval Re�qd. ADB # Approvai--,,�--
Board of Adjustment Approval Reqd.
.Reyie,K.� BY: Date: M-10c:95
--Tr -- - - - - - - - - -
Ex-isting 1-.1ater' Main Size /�2 11 D,11
Water - Main Reqd.
ServiceLine Reqd. 111A
Hydrant Size Existing /"Y
Hydrant Reqd. Per.Fire Code 111,4 Size
Detector Check Meter Reqd.
Cross Connection Inspection
Fire Department Comments
�qater Meter Charge Reqd. 111A ',�7X,qV'�
Date:
Reviex-7� by: /-Z/� 7
Septic Tm--A,� Design Approved Date: ----
Permit No.,
Sep ic Tank -Permit Reqd.
Sanitary Sewer Availability Proj.
Drawing No. File No.
Side Sewer Availability FEE
Sanitary Sewer Connectiot Fee Reqd.
Revia,7 By: Date:
1, A & AL-&,Ak da WE&EA' A� ;ii WA.,
A
ONn Ditch Existina Reqd.
Culvert Rcqd. Size
P4 Catch Basin Rcqd.— Indicate on Site Plan
0 S1 ioulder, drainage n-nintain collect:ion on swale open . runo
E-4
reqd.
Indicate oii Site Pl.
Soil Conditions ;.-md Gromd Water Field Cliecked
R,oview by -x;,;, R1 te
il'Street.Paving Reqd.
Curb and Cutter Reqd.
Sideaalk Reqd.
Curb Cut for Drive�4av Reqd.
Ri,ght-of-Way Construction Pe=.'-t- Reqd.
Bond Reqd. for Public In-provm-onts-
Street Nar-m Sign Reqd.
OLher Signin- Read.
Pre Peimir- Site Inspection rmd e o n
0 BY: SR,,.IER
WIATER
L.4
S'I=T
P�4 ENIGINE-EUNG
Special Rcquirei-,-c�nts listed in ma-M to -Comn.Mity Develop mint Deparm�nt
Buildiiig Division
BY Date
0 1? All. items filled i-n on Bui ift Application
re BY— Date��
P14 Drawinf-,,s Staiiped and S I -tide
p �-o n
Date
Approved by Public 1%lorks Depal-Li-,,!wL:
Revisecl: - lv 10- 19,17
ENGINEERING 13
'IMENTS FOR BUILDING PE
CITY 010 El."T)Nq_)�)
PHLIC UORKS
PPLICATION
SUBJECT:
Subdivision
Multiple
,q \
Plat-__.
Commercial
DATE
PRD
GD4ERAL Rl,"QUIRUITLITES
Coordination of the location or any structure resnert to titilities, streets, Droperty
lines and di,ivewa.y grades is the responsib.`.lity of' the contractor.
The ccnstra,�i-or is required to keep the abutting street cleaned.oC dirt and debris caused
by the construction 7.30.200 Violations - Penalties 7.30.290.
A "Right-Of-Wa�y Construction Permit" is required from the EnFineeringr Division of Public
Works for any work within the Public right-o.f-way or public easement. 7.30.010 Violations
Penalties 7.30.290.
SPECII:'IC REQU113ZIETIPS
UNDERGROUIM POIVER
Undersround Wiring Reqld W,Jot Req I d
SANITARY SEWER (P=,IIT R_FQ1D)
Connection to Sallita
_ry Sewer. Req I d
El Back Uater Valve Req'd on Side Sewe I r
Septic Tai-ik Perinit Reald. Desip-3i Approval Req'd
Approved Dt. PerTidt Humber
STORM SEWLi SYSTE"i (PER CI7`Y CODE
Draina- e Fl,-ui Reqld
El Site Drainage to be Contained on S'ite
ROADWAY E]PR(DV&jL*7j1S Aj��L) IDRT'&I-IAY NEQUIRl'AT-101TS
Not to Exce d 111��
El Driveway Favi-n- Req'd 1��%E5M-4
C�
Vertical Curb Req'd
El Street Favin-, Req'd
El Drainage Plan Aroroved Dt.
El Site Drainag�� to be Connected'to City System
tz.-Irn T-4 C_—
E) Driveway CLIlvert Reqld Size
El sidewalk Reqld.
[] Approvc-cl Desifr)i Req I d
El Bond Recild for Public liiiprovements EjSubmit Cost Estimate N
Note. -
Inspections Tl:',-- n I J. Enginee-ring
Division
Foundation.
El Side
Sewer Septic Tank
Water Service
El Fire
Protection Drainage
El
Site Improveny--nts
A 24
hour notice is required for inspection
by Engineering,.call 775-2525, extension 220.
I nERG, P.E.
Cliv
City oadmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The information
needed to complete the Checklist should be easily
available from observations- of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas or soil
surveys)-
J k.
Date Received: I 1 1
City Receipt#: 1 -A
Critical Areas File #:
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00
Date Mailed to Applicant:
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a. development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent
information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indernnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable
attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information fin-nished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authorize to file this application on the-Jrhalf of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE oF APPLicANTIAGENT DATE
Property Owner's Authorization
By my signature, I certily that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public offIcials andthe staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and postin"ttenOntjx).,ffiisapplication.
, SIGNATURE OF OWNER
Owner/Applicant:
Carmell Properties IJr-
Narne
24329 Pacific Hwy 99
Street Address
-Wmnds, WA 98026
City State zip
Telephone: (425) 778-1131
Email address (optional):
DATE// —/d - 0r3
Applicant Representative:
Drico Construction Inc.
Name
PO Box 1430
Street Address
Mukilte6, WA 98275
city - State zip
Telephone: (425) 745-9117
Email Address (optional): drico@psthbs.cCM
Critical Areas Checklist.doc/4.22.1003
CA File No: C)3 -1 5
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/ topography/hydrology/vegetation)
1. Site Address/Location: 24329 Pacific HW 99 Edwnds, �A 98026
2. Property Tax Account Number: 00491100001709, 00491100001608
3. Approxuinate Site Size (acres or square feet): - 53 acre .91 acre respectively
4.. Is this site currentlydeveloped? X yes; _ no.
If yes; how is site develoved? Auto Dealership
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of .10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No ; Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: No Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year? NA
8. Site is in the floodway No floodplain No of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
No Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested — ; meadow ;shrubs — ; mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) asiphault
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No
City Staff Use Only
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable?
2. SiteisZoned?
3. SCS mapped soiitype(s)? A ldcs- w-aa d
- 2,
4. Critical Areas inventory or ILA. map indicates Critical Area on site? M�
5.
Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? Ala-f- "A -C"Lv 12�
DETERMINATION
-STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER
Reviewed by:
Date:
t,nncaj AreaS UneCK11St.d0Ct4.Z2.2UUJ
City ot4ldmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The information
needed to complete the Checklist should be easily
available from observations- of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil
surveys).
nV
.Date Received: // 12-10 Z2
City Receipt#: sa;j 6
Critical Areas RIP
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00
Date Mailed to Applicant:
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent
information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
� 6�1
The undersigned applicant.19n1h, d"i"","and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable
attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on th5jj�half of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLIcANT/AGENT t_�) A'e—L— DATE __Z1
Property Owner's Authorization
By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public pfflicials and,the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and postin"tten3ldnt jz_thi�4pplicafion.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE 0r2
Owner/Applicant: V Applicant Representative:
Camell Properties IJr- Drico Construction Inc.
Name Name
24329 Pacific Hwy 99
Street Address
Edmonds, WA 98026
City State * zip
PO Box 1430*
Street Address
Mukilte6, WA 98275
city State zip
Telephone: (425) 778-1131 Telephone: (425) 745-9117
Email address (optional):
Email Address (optional): drico@psthbs.c(xn
Critical Areas Checklist.doc/4.22.2003
Critical Areas Checklist CA File No:
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/vegetation)
1. Site Address/ Location: 24329 Pacific R&Ty 99 Edmonds, WA 98026
2. Property Tax Account Number: 00491100001709, 00491100001608
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): -53 acre .91 acre respectively
4. Is this site currentlydeveloped? X yes; — no.
If yes; how is site developed? Auto Dealership
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat. less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: NO Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year? NA
8. Site is in the floodway — No floodplain No of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
No Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow ;shrubs — ; mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) asphault
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: —No
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable?
2. Site is Zoned? ee:,�
tal?
3. SCS mapped soil e,.,
Tor City Staff Use Only
64--- w4lle
4. Critical Areasmventory or . C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? /Vo
5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? Iva-t- !2-IC
DETERMINATION
STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER
Reviewed by: A
Datt-!
t-nucai Areas UICCUSt.doc/4.222M -
�:"BEE'f FILE
PBELL NELSON 24239 HWY 99 SIGNS:
WALL -MOUNTED SIGNS EXISTING PROPOSED
DEALER #1 (SOUTHSIDE)
22.9
31.5 SQ. FT.
DEALER #2 (WESTEND)
22.9
31.5 SQ. FT.
SERVICE
16
33.44 SQ. FT.
VW LOGO #1 (SOUTH)
7.4
22.56 SQ. FT.
VW LOGO #2 (WEST).
7.4
7.4 SQ. FT.
VW LOGO #3
21.75
9.92 SQ. FT.
EXISTING TOTAL FOR WALL -MOUNTED SIGNS 98.35 SQ. Fr.
PROPOSED TOTAL FOR WALL -MOUNTED SIGNS 136.32 SQ. FT.
TOTAL ALLOWED FOR WALL MOUNTED SIGNS 306 SQ. FT.
BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG 205'" & HWY 99 4 173+ 133 = 306 SQ. FT.
FREESTANDING SIGNS EXISTING PROPOSED
POLE SIGN 56.1 SQ. FT. 70.13 SQ. FT.
READER BOARD 112 + 15 SQ. Fr.
EXISTING TOTAL FOR FREESTANDING SIGNS 183.1 SQ. FT.
BUILDING FRONTAGE DIVIDED BY 2 145 SQ. FT.
Chanda Earhart 6/l/01
,iTREE'
NANMDA, (:�Ilq-lollo
'r I
Q[PERMITEXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
IISE PERMIT
ZONE e4-6--
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
ICATION
—NUMBER
JOB SUITEIAPT*
ADDRESS.�
OWNER ..E .1 USF
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO�
LID NO.
MAILING ADDRESS
LID FEE S
- '�
q .1, &,&,— '7 �
'U-UC GHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MA—P
YA�.S P App�
h R-
�-* ;L
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
��
LAIbIINU— PROPOSED�
S
Side— ft�ad 13
REQUIRED DEDICATION— I —
Uaag—
NAME
METER SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIR D
C3
ES NOEP(
ADDRESS
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
0 W N E P C 0 N T R A C T 0
ZIP ]TELEPHONE
z'l
IIA
NAME JCB��
CB
BY
IN R E
ENGINEERING REVIEWED
E G IN E E
- ADDRESS
0
'E W Y DATE
FIRE REVIEWED BY
I. R E
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
fOR
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
D Y
CKED Y
'A
VARIA ORCU
V AR HC E 0 C U
SHORELINE OR ADI
T'ON
SPECT'ON
.. 8
BOND
PDSTED
N
No
YES 01.
no
$EPA REVIEW
.EPA -Ev'EW
SIGN AREA
HEIGHT
-EI.HT
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARC4�o.
EXEMPT ALLOW
COMPLETE EXE-v
COMPLETE
ALLOWED PRO
y o o -71,-,
, X
6�a,4 o
EXP
EXP
NEW
3 -EC
PLUMBING I EC'
LOT COVERAGE R UIR D.SETBACKS (Fr.)
LOT COVERAGE
AL OWED PFIOPC
ALLOWED PROPOSED -FR SID��et
PROPOSED S BACKS (Fr.)
FRONT LIFIESTIDE R"
ADDITION
N� E
COMPLIANCE OR
Us
0 CHANGE OF USE
Nq
4'>
BY D
REMODEL
SIGN
A
P PARKING
REGO PROVIDED
PLANNING REVIEWED
[:] GRADING CyDS Ei FENCE
REPAIR ( _ X _FT)
X
I
REMARKS 7/;E
ER
OT7
0 DEMOLISH 0 TANK C] OTHER
RE SPRIN
7
GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER
FIRE ALARM
FIRE
CARPORT ROCKERY
BUSINESS =PLAIN:
CHECKED BY
RUCTIO.
CCU PANT
ITYP
�11/
OR P
I OU
NUMBER
01
NUM FR OF
DWELL G
WEIFI,
CRITICAL
AREAS
SPECIAL INSPECTION
OCCU PANT
LOAD
STO
U NITS
NUMBER
REQUIRED XYE S JA1711
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
0,�� An
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 1081FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
z
§
I— -a.-CA4 ow-'-
VAI I IATIn?J
Description
FEE I
Description
FEE
Plan Check
P
State Surcharge
/1".57112
=RCE -'&.Vrlo� % LOT SLOPE %
Building Permit
B
City Surcharge
PLAN CHIEC��.*8 VE TED DATE
Plumbing
P
0C
too.
Mechanical
M
THIS PERMIT AUTHOR S ONLY THE WOR9 1-01 Aff COVERS WORK TO
t: 11 DONE IN PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
Grading
G
DOMAIN (CURBS. SIDEWALKS. DRMWAYS. MARQUEES, E TC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
E.
PERIIUTAPPUCATI N: 160 DAYS
A RTE
PERMIT U.rr. I YEAR - PROVIDED WOOK IS STA D WITHIN IN DAYS
Engr. Inspection tz,
�92
_ BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
SEE
0 . N ENALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Fire Review
&10 Plan Chk. Deposit
;APPLICANT,
N INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS. WASHINGTON. its OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Inspection
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE. ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
Landscapelnsp.
Li
Total Amt. Due
W414.
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCEI
N OR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CrTrS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.-
Recording Fee
Receipt III L--94
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT � HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN is CORRECT. AND THAT AM THE OWNER. OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
Unot.p.,.:.nWigdbyth-
=ftw
TIOW. AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
.Thistippircaut,
ding OffxiW DepLdy: ard Fan are paid. and
receipt Is aCknomdedged in space pimided.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
DATE
SIGK1,TUIIE IQWNEA
DW NW
(425)
VEIM
771-0220
DATE
A-T'rENTION
EXT 1333
REI.5A�Fp By
A
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
ORIGINAL -FILE YrILLOW. INSPECTOR/
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
PiNK-OWNER GOLD -ASS SSOR
04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE
MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN ACCOUNTING
New Parcel #
491100001609
491100001702
491100001701
491100001709
491100001608
491100001602
Area (Acres)
2.2
0.38
0.53
0.91
0.45
4.47
Campbell Nelson
24329 Highway 99
Storm ESUs
Area (ft'2) Impervious % Impervious Area ESUs
(Acres)
95,832
16,553
23,087
39,640
19,602
194,714 95% 4.25
0/0
61.66
W Western
engineers
E
4--,— Iit I n c
SURVEYORS - PLANNERS - -ENGINEERS
13000 Highway 99 South * Everett, Washington 98204
(425) 356-2700 FAX (425) 356-2708
DETAILED STORM DRAINAGE STUDY
for
Campbell Nelson - Volkswagen
. 24329 - Highway 99 South
Edmonds, WA. 98026
TAX ID. 's
00491100001602
00491100001608
00491100001701
00491100001702
00491100001709
0 PREPARED BY:
Barry R Constant, PE
IVIC'0.0
REVIEWED BY:
J..C. McDonnell, MS, PE
21137
0 JOB NO.: 03-408-A 0-,D
CLIENT: Campbell -Nelson Volkswagen
24329 - Highway 99 South
Edmonds, WA. .98026 RECSIVED
0 Tel: (425) 315-8105
APR 2 92004
ISSUE DATE: September 25, 2003. PERMIT COUNTER
REVISION DATE: March 31, 2004
0 CONTRACTOR:. Wilcox Construction
(425) 774-4185
I
LAND USE CONSULTANTS - CIVIL ENGINEERS * LAND SURVEYORS ENGINEERING CORPORATION
0
E
0
0
0
0
0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB
CHAPTER
PAGE #
1.
DRAINAGE INFORMATION SUMMARY FORM
3
2.
PROJECT PROPOSAL & SCOPE
5
3.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
6
4.
DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS
8
5.
DETENTION DESIGN CRITERIA
9
6.
SUMMARY OF HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
12.
7.
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
13
8.
DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS
16
9.
BASIN MAPS & RELATED REPORTS.
17
U
0
0
C1
9
0
0
0
1. DRAINAGE INFORMATION SUMMARY FORM
Project Name: CAMPBELL NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
Project Engineer: WESTERN ENGINEERING, INC.
Project Applicant: Wilcox Construction, Inc..
Property Total Area: 4.438Acres 7 4-
Project Development Area-.,;A91)k�res
Number of Lots: 5
Summary Table:
Basin Designation A:
New Building Rooftop & Perimeter
Type of Storage Proposed
Approximate Storage Volume
Soil types:
Pre -developed Runoff Rate
Storm Event
QAC—fS)
2-year
0.026
10 year
0.064
100 year
0.179
Basin A is 1.22 acres.
Underground Corrugated Metal Pipe
5,634cf
Alderwood
Post -developed Runoff Rate Before /after controlling
Storm Event -Q-(—CfS)
2-year 0.35/0.015
10 year 0.732 / 0.064
100 year 0.73/0.180
�03
7,zs
3
U
1. DRAINAGE INFORMATION SUMMARY FORM (cont.)
Basin Designation B:
1.05
Re -paved Rear Parking Area
Basin B shalt be total area of �.�acres
Type of Storage Proposed
Underground Corrugated Metal Pipe
Approximate Storage Volume
4,581 ef
Soil types
Alderwood
Pre -developed Runoff Rate
Storm Event Q (cfs)
2-year 0.021
10 year 0.054
100 year 0.153
Post -developed Runoff Rate Before /after controlling
Storm Event Q (cfs)
2-year 0.284/0.01
10 year 0.390 / 0.063
100 year 0.60/0.156
Type of water quality measure(s) proposed:
L Silt Fence around site perimeter.
2. Standard erosion control BMPs at building stage such as mulch, seed, hay bales,
sediment traps, TESC entrance to control construction runoff.
17
0
4
� 0
2. PROPOSED PROJECT
The site is located in the City of Edmonds at 24329 - Highway 99 South in Section
3 1, Township 27N, Range 4E, W.M. in Snohomish County, WA. The site was
historically developed as. a retail car dealership, multiple auto repair and painting
facilities and a wrecking yard operating on - the north half of the property. It is
bordered on the north and northeast by State Route 104, on the west by Highway
0 99 and on the south by 205th Street. To the west is commercial development along
205th Street, The south half of the property contains the new car dealership on the
southwest quarter and the used car dealership on the south east quarter. The
wrecking yard portion of the operation, north of the Volkswagen dealership, has
been closed and the property has been placed in transition to other uses.
0
The current proposal will add a second new dealership building with service bays,
showrooms and offices to the easterly half of the 4.4 acres. The owner will re -grade
t he easterly exposed asphalt surfaces for future storage of new cars when the new
dealership is built.
Existing shop buildings and storage buildings will be modified or removed
to make room for the new construction. The existing pavement and impervious
surfaces in the development area will be demolished, the site will be re -graded and
new surfaces will be, placed. The parking area between the new building location
and the existing dealership will also require re -grading to allow a smooth transition
between the two buildings. The footprint of the new dealership building will impact
a considerable area of surrounding impervious surface.
The site will be sub -divided asfollows:
a Developed Basin "A " will include 1. 22 acres of new building rooftop and
peripheral asphalt removal. A large CMP detention tank will be installed
south of the new building to detain the runoff ftom the rooftop and
tributary re-developedparking surfaces.
40 b. Developed Basin "B " will include the rear parking/vehicle storage area to
the north of the proposed building. The area has been expandedftom the
previous 0.93 acres to address the City's concern about existing tributary
pavements to the immediate west of the Development Area that will not be
reconstructed Ihis adds about 0.1 acres to the basin area. Rather than
treat them as Contributing Bypass, we have included the contributing area
in Detention. The additional distance has not been included in Tc
computation however.
0
2. PROPOSED PROJECT (cont)
C. Ae remaining 2.218 acres of existing Campbell -Nelson buildings and
parking lots on the westerly half and along the southerly frontage will remain
outside the "Development Areas" and will not be impacted by the proposed
construction. Ae stormwater ftom these areas cannot be redirected into the
proposed Detention Areas due to the Site elevation and therefore these previously
developed areas will continue to drain as they have in the past.
The accompanying civil plans have shown the limited stormdrain
information regarding how the site is currently drained. There are no good as-
builts available that map the downspout drains either on -site or at the city. 7he
existing Cambell-Nelson building appears to drain via certain Oil Separators
directly to the south to the Public Storm drain system.
7he northwest portion of the site is draining to the west and is reported to
tie into Highway 99 via some grassed swale areas along the west property line.
nese area drain away ftom the new development and are not considered in the
analysis. The existing parking areas south of the new building development area
are currently paved and will not be disturbed by the construction except for utility
trenches to be placedftom the building to the street. 7hese areas are excluded
ftom the Drainage analysis as has been agreed in previous discussions with the
City. 7his is also consistent with the DOE Manual.
EDMONDS DRAINAGE CODE REQUIREMENTS
a. Edmonds current drainage requirements are as follows:
I Six-month, 24-hour storm" means a 1.0-inch rainfall event over a 24-hour period
with a SCS type IA rainfall distribution.
2. Two-year, 24-hour storm" means a 1.5-inch rainfall event over a 24-hour period
with a SCS IA rainfall distribution.
3. Ten-year, 24-hour storm" means a 2.0-inch rainfall event over a 24-hour period,
with a SCS type IA rainfall distribution.
4. "One hundred -year, 24-hour storm" means a 3.0-inch, 24-hour rainfall event over a
24-hour period with a SCS type IA rainfall distribution.
b. All development sites less than one acre that discharge directly or indirectly to a
stream shall be required to limit the peak rate of runoff to the predeveloped condition two-
year, 24-hour design storm, while maintaining the predeveloped condition peak runoff rate
for the 10-year, 24-hour and 100-year, 24-hour storms.
C. All developments greater than or equal to one acre that discharge directly or
indirectly to a stream shall be required to limit the peak rate of runoff to 50 percent of the
predeveloped condition, two-year, 24-hour design storm, while maintaining the predeveloped
condition peak runoff rate for the 10-year, 24- hour and 100-year, 24-hour storms.
6
'0
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS C\
0
The site i 95- cent impervious by virtue of its historical use as a new car
dealership and associated parking lot storage areas. The new proposal will be to
construct a new showroom and office building, on the used car lot. facility,
displacing the current used car sales office. There will be a theoretical net loss of
0 impervious surface if the parking lot areas are modified to address current City of
Edmonds landscaping requirements. The existing"site provides oil/water separators
and storm drain lines to the surrounding properties. The pipe alignments are not
visible from the surface and the discharge points are unknown. We do not know
whether the site provides any existing detention for stormwater runoff but it seems
unlikely.
To develop an accurate Drainage Analysis, we have broken down the 2.22-
acre redevelopment area into two (2) drainage basins. The new building and the
parking areas to the west, south and east will be considered Basin A, and comprises
1.22-acres. The rear parking lot will be considered as Basin B and its area is 1-03-
acres, including a tributary portion of asphalt to the west. Each basin, based on
elevations and drainage routing, will require a separate detention system. We
propose to use underground pipes and their associated control structures to control
all the storm drainage leaving the site, therefore maximizing all available land use
0 for parking and car storage areas.
0
7A
Based upon current site grades and downstream property constraints, all
storm drainage flows will drain into a new Type I catch basin located at the face of
curb on -244 th ST SW. Existing 8"storm drain to the nearest downstream catch
basin will be upgraded to 12-inch diameter. Additional grade changes to the used
car parking area are required based upon the desired finished floor elevation of the
new structure. New water and sewer service will be provided as required by the
City of Edmonds, An addition of a sprinkler system in the new building will
necessitate the construction of a new fire service connection, double detector check
valve and vault, a pressure indicator valve and fire hydrant per Edmonds Standards.
The proposed location for these structures will be just west of the main site access
driveway.
7
r-1
L-A
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS (cont.)
0 TOPOGRAPHY & SOILS
Ll
0
Ll
Site topography consists of previously graded, minimal sloped areas surrounding
the existing car dealership. Western Surveyors re -surveyed the entire site and the
immediate eastern area with a sloped area leading to a small rock wall. It is
unknown how much fill was placed - previously, where it was used and the
compaction of the fill. During the re -grading process, we recommend that prior to
fill placement the entire parking area is rolled & compacted to 90% of the existing
soils Proctor value using as a baseline measurement ASTM D-1557 modified
values. During re -grading and fill placement, soil lifts of 8-inches (m aximum
thickness) and roller compaction, to 90% of the fill Proctor value. At the location
of the new building, including a 1: 1 prism outside the building footprint (minimum
distance 15-feet), is recommended to be compacted to 95% of the proctor value for
the existing and the fill soils, whichever is the higher value.
The Snohomish County Soil Survey maps indicate the area is dominated by
Alderwood series Urban Complex on 2% to 8% slope. In this application, site soils
are Alderwood series GSL, Hydrologic Class C, per the Snohomish County Soil
Survey. CN Assumed for Site = 81 for (based upon site coverage with pasture as
required by the City of Edmonds.
8
4. SITE DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS
Edmonds drainage code permits credit for existing im ervio 's surfaces on
. P u
the property. The detention calculations have been revised to take advantage of this
credit.
0 A. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Assumption: Site is assumed 2nd Growth even though existing Site Development
predates the development of Drainage Controls in Western Washington.
Site Total Area = 4.438 acres includes 5 separate tax parcels.
Site Development Areas:
Basin "A" Building Envelope 0.495 acres
Basin "A" Parking area Re -grades 0.725 acres
Basin "B" Rear Parking areas 1.03 acres
Total Development Areas 2.23 acres
Assumed Pervious Area 2.2,ac. CN = 81 (assumed)
Assumed Impervious Area 0.0 ac. CN = 98 (assumed)
Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam; Hydrologic Group =: C
Developed CN Assumed for Site Undeveloped = 81
B., DEVELOPED CONDITIONS:
41 Future Surface Area Distribution:
Basin'A'
I . Rooftop Impervious
2. Front Parking Lot
Subtotal Basin A
0
Ll
Basin 'B'
0.495 acres
0.725 acres
1.22 acres
1. Rear Parking Lot 0.93 acres
2. Tributary Pavements 0.10 acres
Subtotal Basin B 1.03 acres
Total Development Area 2.25 acres
Storm Event Rainfall amounts (24 hour event):
2-year = 1. 50"
1 0-year = 2. 00"
1 00-year = 3. 00"
9
40
L A
5. DETENTION DESIGN CRITERIA
r-j
L
Detention will be provided to satisfy the 2-year, 10-year and 100-year storm
event per the City of Edmonds storm drainage requirements (Sec. 18.3 0.060 (L) c.)
and the Washington State 1992 Department of Ecology Manual (DOE). The Storm
Drainage calculations are based upon the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph Method
40 as described in the Stormwater Management Manual for Puget Sound published by
DOE in June 1991 (Ref 1).
Rainfall intensity is determined according to the referenced DOE Manual Method
using Isobaric Charts for Snohomish County. Hydrograph calculations and
printouts are performed using the Waterworks Program by Engenious Systems, Inc.
The storm selected was Type IA for Snohomish County as required by DOE
standards. Concentration times were calculated based upon flows from the most
distant point on the site (re -developed area only), to the proposed discharge point.
Due to the location and elevation differences in the re -development area, it was
deemed 'necessary to divide the area into 2 basins to control the surface runoff,
Basin A and B. Each basin will have a separate detention pipe system.
Basin A:
Basin A will be described as the new budding rooftop area (0.495 acre) and
the parking areas to the west, south and east (0. 725 acres). Total area for Basin. A
is 1.22 acres. Basin B shall be described as all of the surface area to the north of
the new building to the northern property line (total area 1.00 acres), Please see
exhibit map below describing basin location and flow paths of surface drainage.
In Basin A, this area slopes from northwest to east in front of the new
building (southern portion) and north to south at the eastern portion of Basin A. All
proposed slopes are 0.5% to 2% around the new building. The rooftop runoff from
the new building will enter the detention pipe structure directly, bypassing water
quality measures as specified in the Edmonds drainage code. The total amount of
storm water runoff from the roof area has been accounted for in the detention pipe
calculations.
Basin A storm water runoff sheet flows across the asphalt parking area and
into catch basin gratings then into the underground detention pipe located in front
of the new building (see- construction plans)' Water quality measures will be
accomplished with Stormfilter catch basin devices prior to the detention pipe (see
below). Both detention pipes are sized to accommodate the 100-year developed
condition storm event.
10
� 0
5. DETENTION DESIGN CRITERIA (cont.)
Basin B:
Basin B shall be described as all of the surface area to the north of the new
building to the northern property line. The beginning of the re -developed parking
lot area, to the west, is at the old re -modeled car parts facility and then to the
eastern property line adjacent to Scotts Bar and Grill parking lot. This area
comprises 1.03 areas (0.93 + 0.1 contributing) and slopes from west to east at
approximately 5% (average).
I
This flow is directed to the southeast corner of the site and enters an
existing catch basin in the street and eventually flows into Lake Ballinger. Basin
descriptions are provided on the computer reports for the design storms of interest,
the 2-year, the 10-year and 100-year storms for undeveloped and developed cases,
respectively.
The criteria is as stated in Edmonds Code section 18.030.060 (L) (a.) Since the site
is greater than I acre in size, the allowable release rates will match 50% of the
undeveloped 2-year, the undeveloped 10-year and the undeveloped 100-year
events, respectively. Storm data is presented in tabular format on the following
0 pages with brief summaries and explanations of the results.
Basin A
Q 2-year Undeveloped = 0.03 cfs / 2 = 0.015 cfs
Q I 0-year Undeveloped = 0.07 cfs
Q 100-Year Undeveloped = 0. 19 cfs
Basin B
Q 2-year Undeveloped 0.02 cfs / 2 = 0.01 cfs
Q I 0-year Undeveloped 0.05 cfs
40 Q I 00-Year Undeveloped 0. 15 cfs
6. WATER QUALITY DESIGN CRITERIA
Basin "All Water Quality Sizing
Basin A, for water quality purposes, is further sub -divided into 2 sub -basin
0 areas to properly size the Storm Filter water quality devices. Sub -basin areas for
Water Quality Area 1 (0.37 acre) and Water Quality Area 2 (0.37 acres). Tributary
Area , I drains into a Storm Filter (2-cartridge) catch basin and then into the
detention pipe. Tributary Area 2 storm water runoff enters 2, type I catch basins,
and flows into a manhole type Storm Filter Storm Manhole device (3-cartridge unit
with only two (2) cartridges installed) and then into the detention pipe (see
construction drawings). These devices separate the oil from the water and most
suspended sediments before it enters the detention pipe. After entering the
detention system storm water is released from the control structure according to the
calculated flows from Waterworks computer program (see below). This flow is
directed to a manhole where it joins the runoff from Basin B and then to the
southeast corner of the site and enters an existing catch basin in the street and
eventually flows into Lake Ballinger (see civil drawings).
During the 6-month water quality storm event, in Basin A for 1.22 acres, we
calculate a total inflow of 3600 cubic feet of runoff at 0.21 cubic feet per second.
In Tributary Area 1, 0.37 acres, total peak flow is estimated at 0.065 cfs with
approx. 1050 cubic feet of runoff. Water quality for this amount calculates to a 2-
cartridge Storm Filter system. In Tributary Area 2, 0.37 acres, total peak flow is
estimated at 0.064 cfs with approx. 1036 cubic feet of controlled runoff. Water
quality for this amount area calculates to a 2-cartridge Storm Filter system. The
remaining runoff, of 1300 cubic feet is from the roof top area and is not subject to
water quality controls and can be diverted directly to the Detention System.
Basin "B" Water Quality Sizing
Basin B, for water quality requirements, during storm events, runoff sheet
flows to the east into 2- Storm Filter catch basins devices (2- 3 cartridge units). In
Basin B , for the 1. 03 -acre area, total peak flow is estimated at 0. 179 cfs with
approx. 2900 cubic feet of runoff. Water quality for this amount area calculates to
a 6-cartridges. Based on the design to utilize 2 cartridge holders, a 3-cartridge unit
will be used in the north half of Basin B (see drawings) and a 3-cartridge unit will
be used in the south half of Basin B (see drawings). After entering the detention
system storm water is released from the control structure according to the
calculated flows from Waterworks computer program (see below).
0
12
41
0
6. WATER QUALITY DESIGN CRITERIA
0 The Storm Filter Design:
Basin A Basin "A" WQ flow = 0.23 cfs. for 1.22 acres
Sub -Basin DO. 5WQO I= 037 Acres
WQ Flow (DO.5WQOI)= 0.065 cfs
#Filters 0.065/0,033 cfs= 1.97
Use 2 - cartridge filters
Sub -Basin DO. 5WQ02= 0.39 Acres
WQ Flow (DO. 5WQ02)= 0.07 cfs
#Filters 0.064/0.033 cfs= 1.94
Use 2 to 3 - cartridge filters
Basin B Basin "B" WQ flow 0.10 cfs for 1. 03 acres
Sub -Basin SF 1 0.58 Acres
0 WQ Flow (SF 1) 0.10 cfs
#Filters 0.10/0.033 cfs 3.03
Use 3 - cartridge filters
0
0
Sub -Basin SF2= 0.46 Acres
WQ Flow (SF2)= 0.079 cfs
#Filters 0.08/0,033 cfs; 2.39
Use 3 - cartridge filters
Storm Filters are approved by Washington DOE as a Best Management
Practice for treatment of stormwater runoff from paved surfaces. Upon request the
Stormwater Management, Inc. will provide a detailed sizing report to verify the
design of the Stormfilters. We have requested a design report to be attached as an
exhibit in the Appendices.
13
0
7. DETENTION HYDRAULIC RESULTS
TABLE I (Hosin A)
JMD
PEAK
TIME
VOL UME
0
#
RUNOF
OF
OF
CONTRIBUTING
STORMEVENT
F
PEAK
HYDRO
AREA
RA TE
(mix)
(cf1A c Ft)
ACRES
kfs)
1
0.026
660
1324
1.22
2 -year undeveloped
10
2
0.064
540
2677
1.22
10 -year undeveloped
3
0.179
490
5817
1.22
100 -year undeveloped
4
0.347
480
5669
1.22
2 -year developed
5
0.476
480
78581
1.22
10 - year developed
6
0.732
480
12260
1.22
100 - year developed
0
7
0.015
1470
2243
1.22
2 -year release
8
0.064
1140
4277
1.22
10 - year release
9
0.180
670
8634
1.22
100 - year release
0
11
0.064
480
1036
0.37
WQ developed"SF] "
12
0.068
480
1101
0.37
WQ developed"SF2 "
13
0.210
480
3417
1.22
WQ developed "A"
I*
14
0
7. DETENTION HYDRAULIC RESULTS (cont.)
0
0
HYD
#
PEAK
RUNOF
F
RATE
k1s)
TIME
OF
PEAK
(Mim)
TABLE 2 (Basin B)
VOL UME
OF CONTRIBUTING
HYDRO AREA
(cf1A c Ft) ACRES
STORMEVENT
1
0.022
660
1177
1.03
2 - year undeveloped
2
0.055
540
2260
1.03
10 -year undeveloped
3
0.158
490
4911
1.03
100 -year undeveloped
4
0.293
480
4786
1.03
2 -year developed
5
0.402
480
6634
1.03
10 - year developed
6
0.618
480
10�350
1.03
100 -year developed
7
0.019
1460
1661
1.03
2 -year release
8
0.068
970
3483
1.03
10 —year release
9
0.158
630
7183
1.03
100 -year release
11
0.100
480
1631
0.58
6-mo. WQ storm, SFI
0
12
0.079
480
1290
0.46
6-mo. WQ storm, SF2
10
A
15
0
8. DETENTION PI[PE SIZING RESULTS
A. Basin A
The enclosed appendices contain the computer results, which indicated the
following required detention sizing:
e Detention pipe is equivalent to 160 If of 78" CNV at an approximate slope
of 0.5%.
9 Riser is a 12" pipe at invert elevation 408.00 ft
* A three -orifice outlet structure with a bottom orifice of 0.487 inches. Raise to
0.5 inches for maintenance & construction purposes.
at elevation 399.50 ft. Outlet invert is 401.50
9 Second orifice 1.6934 inches (1-11/16") in diameter at elevation 407.00 ft
* Third orifice 2.18 inches (2,3/16") in diameter at elevation 407.50 ft
* Overflow at elevation 408.0 ft. Raise an additional 0.25 feet for construction
purposes.
* Connecting manholes will be Type 11-54" diameter.
Required Q-100 Volume = 5,634 cf
Available Volume
155 If of 84" (T-011) CMP @ 38.5 cf/ft = 5,967.0 cf
13 If of 54" SDMH @ 15.9 cf/ft = 206.7 cf
4 LF of 36" CMP @ 7.07 cf/ft 28.0 cf
Available Volume = 6,202 cf > 5,634 cf
Therefore, Pipe is OKAY
Equivalent 160-LF of 84" pipe
Basin A Emergency Overflow:
The standard 12"-Riser / Standpipe will be provided in the new restrictor as an
emergency release point. According to Waterworks printout, for an 12" standpipe
in the printout pages (at El = 408.2 ft), a Q-dev 100 = 0.732 cfs flow will overflow
the riser at a spillway depth of 0.2 feet and will flow safely to the downstream
channel, if the orifices are plugged. In conclusion, the proposed riser is adequate to
safely release flows in excess of the QIOO developed if necessary. If the Riser is
raised 0.25 feet to ease construction of Orifice 3, the relationship will be adjusted
accordingly. The Riser is properly sized to function as an emergency overflow.
16
8. DETENTION PIPE SIZING RESULTS (CONT.)
B. Basin B
The enclosed appendices contain the computer results, which indicated the
following required detention sizing (including a factor of safety of 130% of
required):
V
* Detention pipe plus manholes is equivalent to 215 If of 66" CNT at an
approximate slope of 0.25%.
* Riser is an 12" pipe at elevation 406.50 ft
* A two -orifice outlet structure with a bottom orifice of 0.44 inches at elevation
399.15 ft. Per typical maintenance and operations standards this is increased to
0.5" minimum. Outlet Elevation = 401.15
0 A second orifice 2.777 inches .(2-3/4) in diameter at elevation 405.65 ft
* Connecting manholes will be Type 11-54" diameter.
Required Q-100 Volume = 4,654 cf
Available Volume
M 200 LF of 66" CMP @ 23.8 cf/ft = 4,760 cf
a 20 LF of 54" SDMH @ 15.9 cf/ft = 318 cf
0 7 LF of 24" Dia CMP @ 2.41 15 cf
a 8 LF of 3611 CMP @ 7.0 cf/ft 56 cf
Available Volume 5,149 cf > 4,654 cf
Therefore, Pipe = OKAY
Equivalent - 6611= 215 cf 5,108 cf
Basin B Emergency Overflow:
The standard 12"-Riser/Standpipe will be provided in the new restrictor as an
emergency release point. According to Waterworks printout, for a 12" standpipe in
the printout pages (at El = 406.50 ft), a Qdev100 = 0.60 cfs flow will overflow the
riser at a spillway elevation = 406,65 depth of 0. 15 feet and will flow safely to the
downstream channel, if the orifices are plugged. In conclusion, the proposed riser is
adequate to safely release flows in excess of the Q100 developed if necessary. It is
properly sized to function as an emergency overflow.
17
0
9. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSES
A. Offsite Analysis
A site reconnaissance was performed by Santhosh Moolayil of Western
Engineers Inc. on August 26, 2003 to verify the downstream flow paths and
observe any drainage problems downstream of the site. It was overcast with a
temperature of around 65 degrees. The project site is currently developed with a
few commercial building associated with a car sales dealership. No visible on -site
problems were observed at the time of the field observation.
B. Upstream Analysis
Based on the site reconnaissance and the topographic survey of the site, there is no
upstream runoff entering the site.
C. Downstream Analysis
Please refer to the Downstream Analysis Map attached below for a detailed
description of the downstream flow. Three downstream flow paths were identified
for the project that converges approximately 200-feet from the site. 1). The
western portion of the site drains towards the south into the existing storm drainage
system on 244h St SW. 2). The area drains to the west and enters into a catch
basin located on the west side of the property and eventually drains toward the
south through a closed pipe system. This system is connected to the existing storm
drainage system on 244h St SW. 3). The back parking lot area draining to the east
sheet flows across the site and enters the Precision Tune / Scott's Bar and Grill
parking lot. This gradually flows to the southeast and enters into the existing storm
drainage system on 244h St SW approximately 150-feet from the site.
The storm drainage system on 244h St SW drains towards the east and
eventually enters Lake Ballinger (approximately 1.0 miles east of the site). No
visible drainage problems were observed at the time of field inspection. Site photos
of the relevant structures are provided in Figures 9 through 14 in the Appendix.
18
0
0 10. BASIN MAPS & RELATED REPORTS.
u Site Vicinity Map
0 u Site Soils map
c3 Hydrograph Analyses for Basin A
o Hydrograph Analyses for Basin A
Q Downstream Photos
u Drainage Basin Map
u Downstream Analysis Map
o Grading Quantities
u Site Tc Map
u Stormfilter Sizing Hydrographs (Water Quality)
a Stormfilter Design Report
u Sediment Trap Sizing per DOE
a Gravity Wall Loading Calculations
0
0
19
0
o Site Vicinity Map
20
0
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map Page 1 of 1
0
10
10
0
�m
0
Im
0
0
tr:
t,
N.
0. a
3
% La,k�
B, 4- llyng e r'.
............ ........
..........
FV:
77
LL)
7
so
3 . If
W 46.
A
4
N
%
ago. .6
io.
20
, Ost
so. a
1,17
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km MN
G N
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Mi
Map center is UTM 10 548947E 5291908N (NAD27)
Edmonds East quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 10 NAD83 Datum MN= 17. 9 18
GN=-O. 483
0
http://www.topozone.comlprint.asp9z=10&n=5291908.00036986&e=:548947.000000021&... 9/23/2003
j�
V
'�" Q'I
t
f
..... .....
1, '14
t e,
�". �—Aq fl
FR
if .1
v I V",
'N�&V'11-1��' 0. 'i";" .
P Wl",i
''T 4" 11
Arm
Al ir
J, �pt'��
tA i
'w- n
At Q, i!'&
- *H1
Y"t w
kill
-,kf
A-,r
WIT
4
? "V�
FIGURE 1L.
Western
Engineers Campbell -Nelson Volkswagon
Edmonds, WA
SURVEYORS - PLANNERS - ENGINEER
110 Hwy 99 South, Everett, WA 98204 DATE: 7/10/03 CHECKED: JcM
15) 356-2700+ (425) 356-2708 (FA4
JOB NUMBER: 1 FTLE NAMIE:
03408A PHOT01
0
u Site Soils Map
21
SOIL SURVEY OF SN(
�9
6
00 1
12
water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 20 to 40
inches. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion
is high. A seasonal perched water table is at a depth of
,18 to 36 inches from January to March. Springs or seep
areas are common.
The Everett soil is very deep and somewhat
excessively drained. It formed in glacial outwash.
Typically, the surface layer, where mixed to a depth of
.about 6 inches, is very dark grayish brown gravelly sandy
loam. The subsoil is dark brown very gravelly sandy loam
about 12 inches thick. The upper part of the substratum
is brown very gravelly loamy sand about 5 inches thick.
The lower part to a depth of 60 inches or more is dark
brown extremely gravelly sand.
Permeability of the Everett soil is rapid. Available water
capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or
more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is
moderate.
This unit is used mainly as woodland and for wildlife
habitat. It is also used for urban development.
Douglas -fir is the main woodland species on the
Alderwood soil. On the basis of a 100-year site curve,
the mean site index is 142. On the basis of a 50-year
site curve, the mean site index is 108. The mean annual
increment at culmination (CMAI) for Douglas -fir at age 65
is 146 cubic feet per acre.
Douglas -fir is the main woodland species on the
Everett soil. On the basis of a. 1 00-year site curve, the
mean site index is 141. On the basis of a 50-year site
curve, the mean site index is fl 1. The mean annual
increment at culmination (CMAQ for Douglas -fir at age 65
is 146 cubic feet per acre.
Among the trees of limited extent on this unit are
western hemlock, western redcedar, and red alder.
Among the common forest understory plants are salal,
evergreen huckleberry, brackenfern, red huckleberry,
common rose, and Oregon -grape.
The main limitation for the harvesting of timber is
steepness of slope. Slope restricts the use of wheeled
and tracked equipment in skidding operations; cable
yarding systems generally are safer and disturb the soils
less. Harvesting systems that lift logs entirely off the
ground reduce the disturbance of the protective layer of
duff.
Logging roads require suitable surfacing for year-round
use. Rock for road construction is not readily available
on this unit. Establishing plant cover on steep road cut
and fill slopes reduces erosion. Steep yarding paths, skid
trails, and firebreaks are subject to rilling and gullying
unless adequate water bars are provided or they are
protected by plant cover.
Seedling mortality is the main limitation for the
production,of timber. Reforestation can be accomplished
by planting Douglas -fir seedlings. If seed trees are
present, natural reforestation of cutover areas by red
alder occurs periodically. The high t6mperature and low
moisture content of the Everett soil during the growing
season cause high mortality of seedlings, especially
soil survey
those on south- and southwest -facing slopes. When
openings are made in the canopy, invading brushy
plants, if not controlled, can delay the establishment of
seedlings. Because the rooting depth is restricted by a
cemented pan in the Alderwood soil, trees are subject to
windthrow.
The main limitations ofthe Alderwood soil for septic
tank absorption fields and homesites are steepness of
slope and a seasonal perched water table. Effluent from
absorption fields flows laterally above the pan and can
seep at the bottom of slopes. Drainage is needed if
buildings with basements and crawl spaces are
constructed. This soil sloughs readily when saturated.
The main limitations of the Everett soil for septic tank
absorption fields are steepness of slope and seepage. If
the density of housing is moderate to high, community
sewage systems are needed to prevent contamination of
water supplies as a result of seepage from onsite
sewage disposal systems. Road cuts tend to slough
readily.
To protect the soils in this unit from erosion during
construction, disturbed areas need to be seeded and
runoff should be controlled.
This map unit is in capability subclass VIIe.
AlderTwood-Urban lant�d �com lex 2 to 8 ercent
0 U Co IeX 0
W�is till plaTin�,,.AA�!�
S. r) it i,
tslopes. rnapunit Fisogn ni ns. Areas are irregular
in -shape and are 100 to 1,000 acres in size. The native
vegetation is mainly conifers. Elevation is 50 to 550 feet.
The average annual precipitation is about 40 inches, the
average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F,
and the average frost -free season is 170 to 190 days.
This unit is about 60 percent Alderwood gravelly sandy
loam and about 25 percent Urban land. The components
of this unit are so intricately intermingled that it was not
practical to map them separatply at the scale used.,
Included in this unit are smAll areas of McKenna and
Norma soils and Terric Medisaprists in depressional
areas and drainagew'ays on plains. Also included are
small areas of soilst ' hat are very shallow over a
hardpan; small areas of Everett, Indianola, and Ragnar
soils on terraces and outwash plains; and soils that have
a stony and bouldery surface layer. Included areas make
up about 15 percent of the total ac.re6'ge.
The Alderwood soil is moderately deep over a hardpan
and is moderately well drained. It formed in glacial till.
Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown
gravelly sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper part
of the subsoil is dark yellowish brown and dark brown
very gravelly sandy loam about 23 inches thick. The
lower part is olive brown very gravelly sandy loam about
5 inches thick. A weakly cemented hardpan is at a depth
of about 35 inches. Depth to the hardpan ranges from
20 to 40 inches.
Permeability of the Alderwood soil is moderately rapid
above the hardpan and very slow through it. Available
water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 20 to 40
inches. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion
0
0
0
0
0
0
Snohomish County Area, Washington
is slight. A seasonal perched water table is at a depth of
18 to 36 inches from January to March.
Urban land is areas that are covered by streets,
buildings, parking lots, and other structures that obscure
or after the soils so that identification is not possible.
The Alderwood soil in this unit is used mainly for
parks, building sites, lawns, gardens, and woodland.
The main limitations of the Alderwood soil for
homesites and septic'tank absorption fields are the
depth to the hardpan and the seasonal perched water
table. Onsite waste disposal systems often fail or do not
function properly during periods of high rainfall. Drainage
is needed if buildings with basements and crawl spaces
are constructed. Topsoil needs to be stockpiled during
site preparation and subsequently used to cover the
exposed material. Additions of fertilizer and peat are
desirable prior to seeding grass foe lawns.
This map unit is in capability subclass lVe.
6—Aiderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent
slopes. This map unit is on till plains. Areas are irregular
in shape and are 25 to 100 acres in size. The native
vegetation is mainly conifers and hardwoods. Elevation is
50 to 550 feet. The average annual precipitation is about
40 inches,� the average annual air temperature is about
50 degrees F, and the average frost -free season is 170
to 190 days.
This unit is about 60 percent Alderwood gravelly sandy
loam and about 25 percent Urban:land. The components
of this unit are so intricately intermingled that it was not
practical to map them separately at: the scale used.
Included in this unit are small areas of Everett and
Indianola soils on terraces and outwash plains, Kitsap
soils on terraces and terrace escarpments, and Ragnar
soils on outwash plains. Included areas make up about
15 percent of the total acreage.
The Alderwood soil is moderately deep and
moderately well drained. It formed in glacial till. Typically,
the surface layer is very dark grayish brown gravelly
sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper part of the
subsoil is dark yellowish brown and dark brown very
gravelly sandy loam about 23 inches thick. The lower
part is olive brown very gravelly sandy loam about 5
inches thick. A weakly cemented hardpan is at a depth
of about 35 inches. Depth to the hardpan ranges from
20 to 40 inches.
Permeability of the Alderwood soil is moderately rapid
above the hardpan and very slow through it. Available
water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 20 to 40
inches. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion
is slight. A seasonal perched water table is at a depth of
18 to 36'inches from January to March.
Urban land consists of areas that are covered by
streets, buildings, parking lots, and other structures that
obscure or alter the soils so that identification is not
Possible.
The Alderwood soil in this unit is used. mainly for
parks, building sites, lawns, and woodland.
13
The* main limitations of the Alderwood soil for
homesites and septic tank absorption fields are the
depth to the hardpan and wetness because of the
seasonal perched water table. Drainage is needed if
buildings with basements and crawl spaces are
constructed. Onsite sewage disposal systems often fail
or do not function properly during periods of high rainfall.
Topsoil needs to be stockpiled during site preparation
and subsequently used to cover the exposed underlying
material. Additions of fertilizer and peat are desirable
prior to seeding grass for lawns.
This map unit is in capability subclass lVe.
7—Bellingham silty Clay loam. This very deep, poorly
drained soil is in depressional are -as. It formed in
alluvium and lacustrine sediment. Areas are regular in
shape and are about 2 to 25 acres in size'. The native
vegetation is mainly grass and sedges. Elevation is 50 to
800 feet. Slope is 0 to 3 percent. The average annual
precipitation is about 45 inches, the average annual air
temperature is about 50 degrees F, and the average
frost -free season is 160 -to 18.0 days.
Typically, the surface layer.is very dark gray silty clay
loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil to a depth of 60
inches or more is mottled, gray and olive silty clay.
Included in this unit are small areas of Terric
Medisaprists, very poorly drained organic soils, Norma
soils along upland drainageways, Kitsap and Pastik soils
on terraces, and Bellingham s oils that have been
drained. Included areas make up about 10 percent , of the
total acreage.
Permeability of this Bellingham soil i's slow. Available
water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is limited
by a seasonal high water table that is at a depth of 0 to
about 12 inches from November toJ.une. Runoff is very
slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Ponding
occurs from November to June. -
This unit is used for pasture,' woodland, urban
development, and wildlife habitat.
This unit is suited to pasture if the excess water on the
surface is removed. Tile drains or open ditches can be
used if suitable outlets are available. Grazing when the
soil in this unit is wet results in compaction of the
surface layer, poor tilth, and reduced infiltration. Use of
proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted
grazing during wet periods helps to keep the pasture in
good condition. Propergrazirig practices, weed control,
and fertilizer are needed for maximum quality of forage.
This unit is suited to red alder. On the basis of a 50-
year site curve, the mean site index is 83. The mean
annual increment at culmination (CMAI) for red alder at
age 40 is 89 cubic feet per acre. Among the trees of
limited extent on this unit are Douglas -fir, bigleaf maple,
western redcedar, and western hemlock. Among the
common forest understory plants are trailing blackberry,
western swordfern, thimbleberry, salmonberry, and
huckleberry.
The main limitation for the harvesting of timber is soil
wetness, which limits the use of equipment to. dry
u Hydrographic Analyses For Basin A
22
10
� 0
10
0
0
0
Ll
0
0
3/31/04 11:46:35 am Western Surveyors Inc page 1
CAMPBELL-NELSON
BASIN A/ (3-25-04)
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: B002
NAME: 2-YEAR
UNDEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.22 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.50 inches
AREA..: 1.22 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN.....: 81.00
0.00
TC.... 72.80 min
0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L:
190.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0210.
TcReach - Sheet
L:
116.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0700
PEAK RATE: 0.03
cfs
VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME: 960 min
BASIN ID: B010
NAME: 10-YEAR UNDEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.22 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
2.00 inches
AREA..: 1.22 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 81.00
0.00
TC .... : 72.80 min
0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.06
cfs
VOL: 0.06
Ac-ft TIME: 550 min
BASIN ID: B100
NAME: 100-YEAR UNDEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.22 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPEIA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..: 1.22 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 81.00
6.00
TC .... : 72.80 min
0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.15
cfs
VOL:. 0.13
Ac-ft TIME: 540 min
BASIN ID: BDO02
NAME: 2-YEAR
DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.22 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.50 inches
AREA..: 0.00 Acres
1.22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 0.00
98.00
TC .... : .0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.35
cfs
VOL: 0.13
Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
3/31/04 - 11:46:35 am Western Surveyors Inc page 2
CAMPBELL-NELSON
BASIN A/ (3-25-04)
.BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: BDO10
NAME: 10-YEAR
DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
1.22 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION ....
2.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
1.22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN ....
0.00
98.00
TC ....
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.48
cfs VOL: 0.18
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: BD100
NAME: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
1.22 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION ....
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
1.22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN .... :
0.00
98.00
TC .... :
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.73
cfs VOL: 0.28
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
0
0
Ll
Ll
3/31/04 11:46:35 am Western Surveyors Inc pagre 3
CAMPBELL-NELSON
BASIN Aj (3-25-04)
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD
RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM
RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1
0.026
960
1394
cf
1.22
2
0.057
550
2677
cf
1.22
3
0.153
540
5817
cf
1.22
4
0.347
480
5669
cf
1.22
5
0.476
480
7858
cf
1.22
:e
6
0.732
480
12260
cf
1.22
7
0.015
1470
2243
cf
1.22
8
0.064
1140
4277
cf
1.22
9
0.180
670,
8634
cf
1.22
11
0.210
480
3417
cf
1.22
12
0.065
480
1053'
cf
0.38
13
0.068
480
1101
cf
0.39
14
0.160
480
2605
cf
0.93
1 0
I*
Ll
3/31/04
11:46:35
am
Western
Surveyors
Inc
page
CAMPBELL-NELSON
BASIN
A.
(3-25-04)
STAGE
STORAGE TABLE
UNDERGROUND PIPE
ID No.
PIPE1
Description:
Diameter:
7.00
ft.
Length:
160.00 ft.
Slope...:
0.0050
ft/ft
upstr:
dnstr:
STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- >
STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- >
STAGE<
---- STORAGE ---- >
STAGE < ----
STORAGE ---- >
(ft) ---Cf---
--AC-Ft-
(f t) --- Cf --- -- Ac-Ft-
(f t) --- c f ---
-- Ac-Ft-
(f t) ---
cf ---
-- Ac-Ft-
401.50
0.0000
0.0000
403.50
1077
0.0247
405.50
3190
0.0732
407.50
5261
0.1208
401.60
1.1108
0.0000
403.60
1171
0,0269
405.60
3301
0.0758
407.60
5348
0,1228
401.70
6.2562
0.0001
403.70
1267
0.0291
405.70
3412
. 0.0783
401.70
5432
0.1247
401.80
17.164
0.0004
403.80
1365
0,0313
405.80
3523
0.0809
407.80
5514
0.1266
401.90
35.079
0.0008
403.90
1464
0.0336
405.90
3633
0.0834
407.90
5591
0,1284
402.00
61.007
0.0014
404.00
1565
0.0359
406.00
3743
0.0859
408.00
5666
0.1301
402.10
95,802
0.0022
404.10
1667
0.0383
406.10
3852
0.0884
408.10
5736
0.1317
402.20
140.20
0.0032
404.20
1771
0,0401
406.20
3961
0,0909
408.20
5802
0.1332
402.30
194.87
0.0045
404.30
1876
0,0431
406.30
4069
0.0934
408.30
5863
0.1346
402.40
240.33
0.0055
404.40
1982
0.0455
406.40
4176
0.0959
408.40
5917
0.1358
402.50
294.82
0.0068
404.50
2089
0.0480
406.50
4282
0.0983
408.50
5963
0.1369
402.60
355.55
0.0082
404.60
2197
0.0504
406.60
4387
0.1007
408.60
6017
0.1381
402.70
421.43
0.0097
404.70
2305
0.0529
406.70
4490
0.1031
408.70
6062
0,1392
402.80
491.78
0.0113
404.80
2415
0,0554
406.80
4593
0.1054
408.80
6097
0.1400
402.90
566.09
0.0130
404.90
2524
0.0580
406.90
4694
0.1078
408.90
6123
0,1406
403.00
643.97
0.0148
405.00
2635
0.0605
407.00
4793
0.1100
409.Oa
6140
0.1410
403.10
725.10
0.0166
405.10
2745
0.0630
407.10
4891
0.1123
409.10
6151
0.1412
403.20
809.21
0,0186
405 .20
2856
0.0656
407 .20
4987
0.1145
409.20
6156
0,140
403.30
896.06
0.0206
405.30
2968
0.0681
407.30
5080
0.1166
409.30
6158
0.1414
403.40
985.43
0.0226
405.40
3079
0,0707
407.40
5172
0.1187
0
0
4
0
U
3/31/04 11:46:35 am Western Surveyors Inc page 5
CAMPBELL-NELSON
BASIN A (3-25-04)
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. Combo
Description:
Structure: ORIF1 Structure:
Structure: Riserl Structure:
Structure:
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE ---
> STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
(f t)
--- cfs -- -------
(f t)
--- CfS -- -------
(ft)
---cfs -- -------
(f t)
--- CfS -- -------
401.50
0,0000
403.30
0,0086
405.10
0.0122
406.90
b.0150
401.60
0.0020
403.40
0.0089
405 ' 20
0.0124
407.00
0.0151
401.70
0.0029
403.50
0.0091
405.30
0.0125
407.10
0.0398
401.80
0.0035
403.60
0.0093
405.40
0.0127
407.20
0,0502
401.90
0,0041
403.70
0.0095
405.50
0.0129
407.30
0.0581
402.00
0.0046
403.80
0.0098
405.60
0.0130
407.40
0.0649
402.10
0.0050
403.90
0.0100
405.70
0.0132
407.50
402.20
0.0054
404.00
0,0102
405.80
0.0133
407.60
0.1169
402 .30
0.0058
404.10
0,0104
405.90
0.0135
407 .70
0.1388
402.40
0.0061
404 .20
0.0106
406.00
0.0137
407.80
.0.1564
402.50
0,0064
404.30
0.0108
406.10
0.0138
407.90
0,1716
402.60
0.0068
404.40
0.0110
406.20
0.0140
408.00
0.1854
402.70
0.0071
404 .50
0.0112
406.30
0.0141
408.10
0,5060
402.80
0.0073
404.60
0.0113
406.40
0.0143
408.20
1,0809
402.90
0.0076
404.70
0.0115
406.50
0.0144
408.30
1.8211
403.00
0.0079
404.80
0.0117
406.60
0.0145
408.40
2.6232
403.10
0.0081
404.90
0.0119
406.70
0,0147
408.50
2.9155
403.20
0.0084
405.00
0,0120
406.80
0.0148
0
E
0
0
14
3/31/04 11:46:35 am
Western Surveyors Inc
page 6
CAMPBELL-NELSON
BASIN A/' (3-25-04)
STAGE
DISCHARGE TABLE
MULTIPLE ORIFICE
ID No. ORIF1
Description:
Outlet Elev:
401.50
Elev: 399.50
ft
Orifice
Diameter: 0.4871
in.
Z)
Elev: 407.00
ft
Orifice 2
Diameter: 1.6934
irr.
Elev: 407.50
ft .
Orifice 3
Diameter; 2.1797
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE <--DISCHARGE
--- >
�ft) --- CfS -- -------
(f t)
--- cfs -- -------
(f t) --- CfS -- ------- -
(f t) ---
cfs -- -------
------------------------
----------------
401.50 0.0000
403.50
0.0091
405.50 0.0129
407.50
0.0708
402.00 0,0046
404.00
0.0102
406.00 0.0137
408.00
0.1854
402.50 0.0064
404.50
0.0112
406.50 0.0144
408.50
0.2413
403.00 0.0079
405.00
0,0120
407.00 0.0151
41
0
-A
r IL
0
3/31/04 11:46:35 am Western Surveyors Inc page 7
.CAMPBELL-NELSON
tsA61N A/ (3-25-04)
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
RISER DISCHARGE ID No. Riserl
Description:
Riser Diameter (in): 12.00 elev: ',---408.;�r ft
Weir Coefficient ... : .9.739 height: 409.00 ft
Orif Coefficient ... : 3.782 increm: 0.10 ft
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE--->
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE.
<--DISCHARGE --- >
(ft)
--- ofs -- -------
(ft)
--- cfs -- --------
(ft)
... cfs .. ........
(ft)
_7cfs -- ------- -
408.00
0.0000
408.20
0.8711
408.50
2.6743
408.80
3.3827
408.00
0,0000
408.30
1.6003
408.60
2.9295
408.90
3.5879
408.10
0.3080
408.40
2.3919
408.70
3 .1642
409.00
.3.7820
10
140
10
�j
3/31/04 11:46:36 am Western Surveyors Inc page
CAMPBELL-NELSON
BASIN A/' (3-25-04)
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE
< -------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (Cfs) (Cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (Cf)
2-YEAR DEVELOPED ............. 0.02 0.35 PIPB1 Combo 406.93 7 4719.81 cf
10-YRAR DEVELOPED ............ 0.06 0.48 PIP81 Combo 407.39 8 5161.29 cf
100-YRAR DEVELOPED ........... 0.15 0.73 PIP91 Combo 407.96 9 5634.07 cf
. .............. I
10
r ]
r- -1
L-A
140
E
a Hydrographic Analyse's For Basin B.
23
4/2/04 10:0:34 am Western Surveyors -Inc
page I
CAMPBELL-NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B REV. April
2,2004
0
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: B002
NAME: 2-YEAR
UNDEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.03 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.50 inches
AREA..: 1.03 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... 81.00 '
0.00
TC .... 61.22 min
0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L: 300.00 ns;0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s.:0,0360
TcReach - Shallow
L: 52.00 ks:3.00 S:0.0364
PEAK RATE: 0.02
cfs VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME: 660 min
BASIN ID: B010
NAME: 10-YEAR UNDEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.03 Acres
BAS.EFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A.
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
2.00 inches
AREA..: 1.03 Acres
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... 81.00
0.00
TC .... 47.79 min
0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.06
cfs VOL: 0.05
Ac-ft TIME: 540 min
BASIN ID: B100
NAME: 100-YEAR UNDEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
1.03 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPE1A
PERV .
IMP
PRECIPITATION ....
3.00 inches
AREA..: 1.03 Acres
0.00 Acres
0
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN .... : 81.00 :
0 * .00
TC .... : 47.79 min
0.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.16
cfs VOL: 0.11
Ac-ft TIME: 490 min
BASIN ID: BDO02
NAME: 2-YEAR
DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.03 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A
PERV ,
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.50 inches
AREA,..: 0.00 Acres
1.03 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... : 0.00 .
98.00
TC .... : 0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE- 0.29
cfs VOL: 0.11
Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
0
4/2/04 10:0:34 am Western
Surveyors
Inc
page 2
CAMPBELL-NELSON
VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B REV. April
2,2004
BASIN
SUMMARY
BASIN ID: BDO10
NAME: 10-YEAR DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
1.03 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.06 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPEIA
PERV *
IMP
PRECIPITATION ....
2.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
1.03 Acres
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN .... :
0.00 -
98.00
TC .... :
0.00 tin
*10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.40
cfs VOL: 0.15
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: BD100
NAME: 100-YEAR
DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
1.03 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A
PERV *
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
1.03 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... :
0.00
98.00
TC .... :
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.62
cfs VOL: 0.24
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: SPI
NAME: Water
Quality Storm North
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.50 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 Cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPE1A
PERV I
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
0.99 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
0.50 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN ....
0.00
98.00
TC ....
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.09
cfs VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: SF2
NAME: Water
Quality Storm North
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.50 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
-0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPEIA
PERV .
IMP
PRECIPITATION .... :
0.99 inches
AREA..:
0,00 Acres
0.50 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN .... :
0.00 ,
98.00
TC .... :
0.00 min
10.00 min -
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.09
cts VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
0
0
L]
4/2/04
10:0:34
am
Western
Surveyors
Inc
page 3
CAMPBELL-NELSON
VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B
REV. April 2,2004
HYDROGRAPH
SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD
RU14OFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM
RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1
0.022
660
1177 cf
1.03
2
0.055
540
2260 cf
1.03
3
0.158
490
4911 cf
1.03
4
0.293
480
4786 cf
I.Q3
5
0.402
480
6634 ci
1.03
6
7
0.618
0.019
480
1460
10350 cf
1661 cf
1.03
1.03
8
0.068
970
3483 cf
1.03
9
0.158
630
7183 cf
1.03
11
0.088
480
1424 cf
0.50
12
0.088
480
1424 cf
0.50
0
0
Ll
4/2/04 10:0:34 am . Western Surveyors Inc page 4
1 CAMPBELL-NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN.B REV. April 2,2004
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. PIPE1
Description:
Diameter: 5.50 ft. Length: 215.00 ft.
Slope ... : 0.0025 ft/ft upstr: dnstr:
STAGE < ---- STORAGE .... > STAGE< ---- STORAGE ---- > STAGE < ---- STORAGE----> STAGE >
(ft) ... Cf --- -- AC -Ft- (ft) --- Cf --- -- AC -Ft- (ft) --- cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) --- !cf --- -- Ac-Ft-
--------------------
401.15 0,0000 0,0000 403.00 1222 0.0281 405.00 3517 0,0807 407.00 5099 0.1170
401.50 44.448 0.0010 403.50 . 1775 0.0407 405.50 4056 0.0931 407.50 5108 0.1173
402.00 308.56 0,0071 404,00 2356 0.0541 406.00 4533 0,1041
402.50 721.52 0.0166 404.50 2943 0.0676 406.50 41904 0.1126
I*
0
L,
Ll
E
4/2/04 10:0:34 am Western Surveyors Inc page 5
CAMPBELL-NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B REV. April 2,2004
STAGE STORAGE TABLE
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. PIPE2
Description: " z
Diameter: 5.00 ft. Length: 255. ft.
Slope ... 0.0025 ft/ft upstr:
STAGE < .... STORAGE ---- > STAGE < ST?!AOT —STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAGE >
(f t) --- C f --- -- AC -Ft- (f t) C! (f t) --- ef--- --Ac-Ft- (f t) ... c f --- -- Ac-Ft-
00 1 1
401.15 0.0000 0.0000 403.00 1 1 0,0301 405.00 3768 0,0865 407.00 5007 0.1149
401.50 42.295 0,0010 403. 1914 0.0439 405.50 4305 0.0988
1
402.00 318.97 0.0073 .00 2543 10.0584 406.00 4732 0.1086
1
402.50 763.93 0.0175 404.50 3170 0.0728 406A0 4981 0.1143
L7
0
0
0
4/2/04 10:0:34 am Western Surveyors Inc page 6
CAMPBELL-NEL80N VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B REV. April 2,2004
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. Combo
Description:
Structure: ORF1 Structure:
Structure: Risel Structure:
Structure:
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE ---
> STAGE
<--DISCHARGE ---
> STAGE
<--DISCHARGE ---
> STAGE
<-.-DISCHARGE ... >,
(f t)
--- efs -- -------
(f t)
--- CfS -- -------
(f t)
--- cfs -- -------
(f t)
cfs -- -------
401.15
0.0000
402.60
0.0063
404.10
0.0090
--------------
405.60
:10.0111
401.20
0.0012
402.70
0.0065
404.20
0.0092
405.70
.'0,0314
401.30
0.0020
402.80
0.0067
404,30
0.0093
405.80
:0.0463
401.40
0.0026
402.90
0.0069
404.40
0.0094
405.90
:0.0566
401.50
0.0031
403,00
0.0071
404.50
0,0096
406.00
10,0650
401.60
0.0035
403.10
0.0073
404.60
0.0097
406.10
:;0,1077
401.70
0.0039
403.20
0,0075
404.70
0.0099
406.20
':0.1401
401.80
0.0042
403.30
0.0077
404.80
0.0100
406,30
10.1639
401.90
0.0045
403.40
0.0079
404.90
0.0101
406.40
:0.1839
402.00
0.0048
403.50
0,0080
405.00
0.0103
406.50
:0.2016
402.10
0,0051
403.60
0.0082
405.10
0.0104
406.60
402.20
0.0054
403.70
0.0084
405.20
0,0105
406.70
1.1036
402.30
0.0056
403.80
0.0085
405.30
0.0107
406.80
1.8466
402.40
0.0059
403.90
0.0087
405.40
0.0108
406.90
':2.6514
402.50
0.0061
404.00
0.0088
405.50
0.0109
407.00
'2.9461
0
0
L]
0
4/2/04 10:0:34 am Western Surveyors Inc page 8
CAMPBELL-NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B REV. April 2,2004
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
MULTIPLE ORIFICE
ID No. ORF2
Description:
Outlet Elev:
401.15
Elev: 399.15
ft
Orifice
Diameter: 0.4395
in.
Elev: 405.65
ft
Orifice 2
Diameter: 2.7773
in.
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGS
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE ... >
STAGE
<-;-DISCHARGE--->
(ft) ---cfs -- ------- (f t) --- CfS -- -------
(f t) --- cfs -- -------
(ft) -2;-Cfs -- -------
401,15 0,0000
403.00
0.0071
405.00
0,0103
407.00
�0.2559
401.50 0,0031
403.50
0.0080
405.50
0.0109
402.00 0.0048
404.00
0.0088
406.00
0.1354
402.50 0.0061
404,50
0.0096
406.50
0.2051
10
is
I-
L-1
UA
0
4/2/04 10:0:34 am
Western Surveyors Inc
page 9
CAMPBELL-NELSON
VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B REV. April 2,2004
STAGE
DISCHARGE TABLE
RISER DISCHARGE
ID
No. Risel
Description:
Riser Diameter (in):
12.00
elev: 406.50 ft
Weir Coefficient ... :
9.739
height: 407.50 ft
Orif Coefficient ... :
3.782
increm: 0.10 ft
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE
<--DISCHARGE--->
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE
<.:-DISCHARGE --- >
(f t) --- CfS -- ------- (f 0
--- cfs -- ------- (ft) ---cfs -- ------- (f t)
-:-Cfs -- -------
406.50 0.0000 406.70
0.8711
407.00 2.6743 407.30
�:3.3827
406.50 0.0000 406.80
1.6003
407.10 2.9295 407.40
3.5879
406.60 0.3080 406.90
2.3919
407.20 3,1642 407.50
17820
0
0
�j
0
F, I
L
4/2/04 10:0:36 am Western Surveyors Inc page 10
CAMPBELL-NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
BASIN B REV. April 2,2004
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE
< -------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (CfS) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf)
2-YBAR OUT ................... 0.01 0.29 PIP81 ORF2 405.53 7 4088.58 Cf
10-YRAR OUT .................. 0.06 0.40 PIP81 ORP2 405.73 8 4273.92 cf
100-YEAR OUT ................. 0.16 0.62 PIP81 ORF2 406.16 9 4653.47 cf
10
10
Ll
0
0
0
c3 Downstream Photos
24
g-t'?-Mm U, I
..T
4P.
tub
41
SEW, L
PI
Oo
C.5
---,7- T
�4 -
�"777, , 5,0,
- . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AL
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOR
RK
Al
w"m
6
0
a Drainage Basin Map
�j
22
0
S 4
L LINE
TO"Be
am—
.1 AC
A
ope Ac
-4-A 0 0 -ox:
Rw= &ADM (Mwnxomcw)
M
0 .0,'AC
.0.
hw"9*3 321W 95.00
Igo PLIX 10
fT*2&
LroLoGy OCK H04
&om "i
1.92 AC
small angles
---------- /---
TRDWAW
ly
ao.w
W)
o1q
------------
----------------
X. FROPM SrKR YTW
UP WO fX
o7j,
2 4 4 T 11 S T R E E T S
voom c�._
N. 2 5 T H S T R E E
"'4 co
DRAINAGE BASIN MAP
CAMPBELL NELSON
17
u Downstream Analysis Map
0
23
0
140
E
0
0
0
AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY MAP
'W
Western
Engineers
SURVEYORS - PLANNERS - ENGINEERS
13000 Hwy 99 South, Everett, WA 98204
(425) 356-2700+ (425) 356-2708 (FAX)
FIGURE I - �
Campbell -Nelson Volkswagon
Edmonds, WA
SCALE: DATE: 7/10/03 CHECKED: JcM
NONE
JOB NUMBER: FIELE NANM:
BY: JCM 03408A PHOT01
0
o Grading Quantities
24
[General] COMP-VOL-08-05-03.sdf
Type=COMPOSITE
Revision=1
[TinProperties]
Description=site: 03408a
[site]
siteName=03408a
[Strata]
StrataName=VOL-CALCS-8-05-03
surfacel=egl
Surface2=fg-8-05-03-wsr
[Stati sti cs]
NUMPointSTotal=1083
BoundingBOX=(10254.614973,7435.516788)-(10647.028437,7738.714431)
NlinEasting=10254.614973
minNorthing=7435.516788
minElevation=-3.682730
MaXEasting=10647.028437
MaXNorthing=7738.714431
MaxElevation=3.866858
—IVOlumestatistics]
Cut=23-8-2—.4ME72-
21
Fill=2653 .480182J
Nei—=271—Mooq
Page 1
a SITE Tc MAP
28
0
E
E
0
0
0
'SK44L
--i
?MEHRflAj=
r414-
413-
10-
18
12
12
5 T H S T R E E T
M Mr-fl,
SD---..
F,
-f�4
co UMG
'MnBn
TO 2 BLOCK HIGH -
HIGH -
ECOLOGY BLOCK WALL
W
'CL
.39
4
4*(X)- '�b.l AC
t
Oman
ASPtaLT
'BAOM/ "Ir
ASPH9
3-Cm
op gmmvwl
2
q.93 Ac
0 13.93X
mp
&MAW ftwwammN)
j_
it
$2, o
r
x
A AU
'6
d �;1=1135
�OOF ',AIM'-0.491'AC
-
Ex. pAwtv LOT
- MMFMWr
— — — — — — --
N89'36'32 V 95 W
wwom mw cm W4*W
FF-414.5
EX. snxcnm
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o Stormfilter Sizing Hydrographs ( Water Quality)
29
4
VI
T--
SRI o,
c G #RU "'B' i 7
A AC
I BAW
Ac
ll� A-4 -i kc
----------
102 A
\ 4%
.4m 49'AC
'LISmv cw w4atw
wQl 0.37 Ac
wagon ANIBIRE
------------
f
11=1 ------------
------------
- - - ------------ ------ ----
W"! 6/, -------- �.pv -------- -------
X. IZZ
lw-
2 4 4 T q S T R E E T S WP,
c
N. 2 5 T H STREET 2=--
WATER QUALITY BASIN MAP
CAMPBELL NELSON
4/14/04 11:42:21 am Western Surveyors Inc page 1
CAMPBELL-NELSON
WATER QUALITY SUB -BASINS
BASIN A (4-14-04)
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: DO.5WQ01
NAME: 6-MONTH WQ/BASIN
A WQ1 AREA
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.37 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION.....:
0.99 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
0.37 Acres
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN ....
0.00
98.00
TC ....
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.06
cfs VOL: 0.02
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: DO.5WQ02
NAME: 6-MONTH WQ/ BASIN
A WQ2 AREA
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
0.37 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION ....
0.98 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
0.37 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. ....
10.00 min
CN....:
0.00
98.00
TC ....
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.06
cfs VOL: 0.02
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
0
r-
L-1
4/14/04 11:42:21 am Western Surveyors Inc page 2
CAMPBELL-NELSON
WATER QUALITY SUB -BASINS
BASIN A (4-14-04)
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD
RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM
RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
2
.3
A
6.026
A ^�"
W,l
0.1:53
E). 341�
960
559
540
488
±394 ef
2677 ef
58t? cf
_ct
±.22
t.22
T-2t-
5
6
:7
8
8.ct32
0.6±5
9 . E_)64---++4,V-__
Itov
48()
t410
t2266 cf
2243 uf
A
12- i i t-;.L-
t.22
t.22 -
9
11
0.065
6:7
480
� � A
ww-- __
1 049 cf
±.22
0. 3.7 &/!l S-F
12
0.064
480
1036 cf
0.37
13
0.210
480
3417 cf
1.22
0
0
Ll
E
Ll
0
0
Ll
4
ftoo-
to
c TOMBW
I to I HLOCW I
ECOLOGY X" WXL
.1 AC
If
I IBAEC We
d" Ac I I AV
W9A* Sh -\10.08 AC
I \\ \
I --- "W'\ . . \
MW &AM 0Mr0AFXtrA=Q 4--- 4— L
0
BAW
WWAiWA=0A9 C'F-----
fF-414J
WQJ AM 0.37 AC9
Ex V�
If to 2 &OC"'W,, -
Ecawr &OC, WAL
mommm mommilm
F,
---------------
--- ---- - t- -4-j- WQ2 AMA 9:36 AC
El
------ -------
3 ------------
so ------------
�—SD
ppoposco SEVEP me so_
TA" INTO ly "WN I
66,.M* 2 4 4 T S T R E E T S
sw-wl� Co.
N. 2 5 T H S T R E. E T mo co
0
WATER QUALITY BASIN MAP
CAMPBELL NELSON
0
4/14/04 11:9:56
am Western
Surveyors
Inc
page 1
CAMPBELL-NELSON
VOLKSWAGEN
STORMFILTER SIZING
BASIN B REV. April
14,2004
BASIN
SUMMARY
BASIN ID: SF1
NAME: Water
Quality Storm
North
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
0.58 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPE1A
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION ....
0.99 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
0.58 Acres
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN ....
0.00
98.00
TC ....
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.10
cfs VOL: 0.04
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: SF2
NAME: Water
Quality Storm
North
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
0.46 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE ....
TYPE1A
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION ....
0.99 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
0.46 Acres
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN ....
0.00
98.00
TC ....
0.00 min
10.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.08
cfs VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
0
9
0
� 0
4/14/04 11:9:56 am Western Surveyors Inc page 2
CAMPBELL-NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
STORMFILTER SIZING
BASIN B REV. April 14,2004
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK TIME
VOLUME
HYD
RUNOFF OF
OF
Contrib
NUM
RATE PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs min,
cf\AcFt
Acres
--e —.e72-2-6-&O
tq ?1 71
_-3.
A ^
=855
- '58 49e
22260' ee f
A ^� � -
1,94
3:743
IT�.
480
49-1 ef
5
A n A Q
e_ 4Z
6
0 A c) r%
ww
A
I r% C A
----- - ef
:7
_415-V
A n rl �7 ()
5:66± ef
3463
^ "I
8
e#
11
0.100 480
1631 cf
0.58 Ab &I
12
Q.079 480
1290 cf
0.46. -50 el-t-A
r7
L A
u Stormfilter Design Report
30
October 2002
CONDITIONAL SHORT-TERM USE DESIGNATION
for the StormFilter
Applicant: Stormwater Management, Inc., (SMI), Manufacturer and
Vendor
James H. Lenhart, PE, V.P. of Research and Development
(Responsible Corporate Officer), (800) 548-4667
Address of Applicant: 12021-B NE Airport Way
Portland, OR 97220
Application Documents: January 29, 2002 Letter from Mr. Lenhart
July 31, 2002 Letter from Mr. Lenhart
January 2002 Report: "Stonnwater Management
StormFilter Interim Short -Term Use Application for Basic
Treatment in Western Washington"
August 1, 2002 Report: "Conditional Short Term Use
Designation Addendum"
Applicant's Use Level Request Interim short-term use designation for basic treatment in
accordance with Ecology's 2001 Stormwater Manual (SMI
January 29, 2002 letter)
Applicant's Performance Claims A high expectation that the designs outlined in the
conditional designation application will result in
performance characteristics that will meet or exceed the
water quality goals for basic treatment (and enhanced
treatment) recently established by Ecology. (SMI July 31,
2002 letter)
Ecology Decision: Based on SMI's application submissions and
recommendations by the Technical Review Committee
(TRC) Ecology is hereby issuing a Conditional Short -
Term Use Designation for the SMI StormFilter as a
Basic stormwater treatment for Total Suspended
Solids (TSS) removal. This designation expires on
December 31, 2004, unless extended by Ecology, and
is subject to the conditions. specirled below.
Technical Review Committee Findino:
The TRC finds sufficient evidence that SMI should be
able to demonstrate, through additional laboratory and
field testing, that the StormFliter can attain Ecology's
Bask Treatment goals.
Page I
U,
Findinas of Fact:
1 .
A StormFilter containing coarse perlite and laboratory -tested at 15 gallons per minute
(gpm) averaged 79% TSS removal. The influent TSS consisted of sandy loam soil (45%
by mass less than 50 microns). Testing was conducted at TSS concentrations up to 301
mg/L.
2.
A StormFilter containing a coarse/fine perlite mix and laboratory -tested at 7.5 gpm
averaged 71 % TSS removal. The influent TSS consisted of slit loam soil (85% by mass
less than 50 microns). Testing was conducted at TSS concentrations up to 247 mg/L.
3.
A StormFilter containing leaf compost (CSF) media and laboratory -tested at 15 gpm
averaged 70% TSS removal. The influent TSS consisted of sediment composed mainly
of silt (60%) and fine -to -medium sand (30%).
4.
A StormFilter containing a coarse perlite and laboratory -tested at 7.5 gpm averaged 77%
TSS removal. The TSS consisted of Sil-Co-Sil 106 ground silica (a product of U.S. Silica
Corporation), with 70% by mass less than 50 microns. Testing was conducted at
influent TSS concentrations up to 300 mg1L.
StormFilters containing CSF media and field-tested at 15 gpm averaged 73% TSS
removal, based on a regression analysis combining field and laboratory data. Most TSS
values were below 100 mg/L.
6.
SMI provided a design manual, which includes information on selecting, sizing,
constructing, and maintaining a StormFllter.
7.
SMI provided a list of StormFilter installations in Washington State.
8.
SMI provided other supporting information, such as media specifications and warranty
information.
Conditions of this Qesignation:
1 .
StormFilter systems containing CSF media, fine perlite, or coarse/fine perlite mix are
approved for basic treatment at 7.5 gpm maximum flow rate per cartridge at the water
quality design flow rate as identified by an acceptable runoff model. This approval
applies to land uses where storrnwater influent TSS concentrations are expected to be
300 mg/L or less and TSS particle sizes are expected to be similar to those tested.
0
Because the vendor did not provide test results above 300 mg/L TSS, stormwater
expected to exceed this concentration (based on land use) must be pretreated to reduce
influent TSS concentrations to below 300 mg/L. CSF media can release low amounts of
soluble nutrients so it should not be applied in nutrient sensitive discharge areas.
2.
StormFilter systems shall be installed in such a manner that flows exceeding 7.5 gpm
per cartridge are bypassed around the system or will not resuspend treated sediments.
0
StormFilter systems shall be designed in accordance with the performance goals in
Ecology's 2001 Stormwater Manual and SMI's Product Design Manual Version 3.0
(April 2002), or most current edition, unless otherwise specified. The design, pre-
treatment, land use application, and maintenance criteria in, SMI's Design Manual must
be closely followed.
3.
The StormFilter should be designed with a minimum of 2.3 feet of head differential
0
between the invert of the inlet and the invert of the outlet. Backwater can be a problem if
downstream hydraulic calculations are not performed properly. Backwater will reduce the
hydraulic potential across the filter reducing flow rate throug. h the cartridge. Backwater
may also saturate media for long periods of time.
Page 2
r_1
L-A
4. Excessive solids, hydrocarbon, and/or debris loading should be addressed by SMI
during the design phase to assess if pretreatment is needed, and to determine
appropriate inspection and maintenance frequency. Maintenance is crucial to the
ongoing effectiveness of the StormFilter so detailed operation and maintenance
guidelines must be prepared by SMI for each system.
5. A Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) supporting General Use Level Designation
(GULD) testing shall be submitted to Ecology by November 1, 2002.
6. Results of the GULD testing shall be submitted to Ecology by August 1, 2004.
0 7. This Conditional Short -Term Use designation expires December 31, 2004, unless
extended by Ecology.
Remaining Issues or Concerris about this Technology
1 . The field data included with the application were given limited weight because they were
0 combined with laboratory data, had low TSS influent values, represent older, no -longer -used
system configurations, and/or appeared not to meet many protocol requirements. Most of
the field data, however, were used for improving the technology.
2. In the QAPP, SMI should include testing of all media and media combinations they wish to
market. Zeolite is commonly used in StormFilters, but no zeolite testing was included with
the basic treatment application.
0 3. In the QAPP, SMI should better define maximum allowable influent TSS and oil
concentrations (and any other pollutants that interfere with system performance), above
which pretreatment would be required.
4. In the Technology Evaluation Engineering Report (TEER), SMI should provide graphs
showing capital (excluding shipping and installation) and O&M costs for a broad range of
system sizes, say from 1 to 200 cartridges.
5. In the TEER, SMI should consider whether the StormFilter be also evaluated as an
enhanced treatment and phosphorus and oil removal technology.
Description of the Technology:
The Stormwater Management StormFiltere (StormFilter), a flow -through
stormwater filtration system, improves the quality of stormwater runoff from the urban
environment by removing pollutants. The StormFilter is used to treat runoff from a wide variety
of sites including, but not limited to: retail and commercial development, residential streets,
urban roadways, freeways, and industrial sites such as shipyards, foundries, etc.
0 OPERATION
r]
The StormFilter is typically comprised of a vault that houses rechargeable, media -filled, filter
cartridges. Stormwater from storm drains is percolated through these media -filled cartridges,
which trap particulates and may remove pollutants such as dissolved metals, nutrients, and
hydrocarbons depending on the medium in the cartridge, During the filtering process, the
StormFlIter system also removes surface scum and floating oil and grease. Once filtered
through the media, the treated stormwater is directed to a collection pipe or discharged to an
open channel drainage way. A bypass schematic for flows greater than the water quality design
flow rate is shown in Figure 1.
Page 3
0
0
0
r��
0
Figure 1. SMI StormFilter Configuration with
Bypass
INFUIENT PIPE
NMN FLOW
BYPASS STORUWATEIR MANACEWENT
STORMFILTER.
WATER QUAUTY FLDW
'rTO symunom
HIGH FLOW
HYPASS PIPE-\
TAEAYEID FLOW
FROM STORM
MCHARGE
OUT .-,M— — . —
—0— FoRmnari WITH HION FLOW BYPASS
CONROURA17ON SCHEMATIC
Page 4
0
0
STORMFILTER CONFIGURATIONS
The StormFilter Is offered in five basic configurations: precast, linear, catch basin, cast -in -place,
and corrugated metal pipe form. The precast, linear, and catch basin models use pre -
manufactured units to ease the design and installation procd6ess; cast -in -place units are
customized for larger flows and may be either uncovered or covered underground units. The
corrugated metal pipe units can be customized to meet special site requirements.
0
The typical precast StorrnFilter unit is composed of three bays: the, inlet bay, the
filtration bay, and the outlet bay. Stormwater first enters the inlet bay of the StormFilter vault
through the inlet pipe. Stormwater in the inlet bay is then directed through the flow spreader, which
traps some floatables, oils, and surface scum, and over the energy dissipater into the filtration bay
where treatment will take place, Once in the filtration bay, the stormwater begins. to pond and
percolate horizontally through the media contained in the StormFilter cartridges. After passing
through the media, the treated water in each cartridge collects in the cartridge's center tube from
where it is directed into the outlet bay by an under drain manifold. The treated water in the outlet
bay is then discharged through the single outlet pipe to a collection pipe or to an open channel
drainage way. In some applications where heavy grit loads are anticipated pretreatment by settling
may be necessary.
0
CAI' %"c
FtPAI
FIVeRMUM
0
MWER TUBE
4
QPTWX& SMONPARY
AtTER MEM
fW�Al UMM
INNER ME.-H
6CROBING REGMATM
I
LftVaQH" M&NIM"
MDEPQRAIN MANIFOLD YAULT fWan
FiLTERED WATER CAST!= M&T KMR
Figure 2. The StormFilter Cartridge
CARTRIDGE OPERATION
As the water level in the filtration bay begins to rise, stormwater enters the StormFilter cartridge.
Stormwater in the cartridge percolates horizontally through the filter media and passes into the
cartridge's center tube, where the float in the cartridge is in a closed (downward) position. As the
water level in the filtration bay continues to rise, more water passes through the filter media and Into
the cartridge's center tube. The air in the cartridge is displaced by the water and purged from
beneath the filter hood through the one-way check valve located in the cap. Once the center tube is
filled with water (approximately 18 inches deep), there is enough buoyant force on the float to open
Page 5
0
the float valve and allow the treated water to flow into the under drain manifold. As the treated water
drains, it tries to pull in air behind it. This causes the check valve to close, initiating a siphon that
draws polluted water throughout the full surface area and volume of the filter. Thus, the entire filter
cartridge is used to filter water throughout the duration of the storm, regardless of the water surface
elevation in the filtration bay. This continues until the water surface elevation drops to the elevation
of the scrubbing regulators. At this point, the siphon begins to break and air is quickly drawn
beneath the hood through the scrubbing regulators, causing energetic bubbling between the inner
surface of the hood and the outer surface of the filter. This bubbling agitates and cleans the surface
of the filter, releasing accumulated sediments on the surface, flushing them from beneath the hood,
and allowing them to settle to the vault floor.
ADJUSTABLE CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE
Inherent to the design of the StormFilter is the ability to control the individual cartridge flow rate
with an orifice control disk placed at the base of the cartridge. Depending on the treatment
requirements and on the pollutant characteristics of the influent stream as specified in the SMI
Design Manual, the flow rate may be adjusted through the filter cartridges. By decreasing the
flow rate through the filter cartridges, the influent contact time with the media is increased and
the water velocity through the system is decreased, thus increasing both the level of treatment
and the solids removal efficiencies of the filters, respectively (de Ridder, 2002).
For Additional Information:
Applicant e-mail address: Contact Sean Darcy, seandostormwaterinc.com
(800) 548-4667 or infoastormwaterine.com
Applicant web link www.stormwaterinc.org
Ecology web link: http://www.e!�y.wa.i,�ov/r)roaranis/wq/stortxiwater/new tec!�
Ecology Contact: Stan Ciuba, P.E., Water Quality Program
sciu461 0) - ov
ecy.wa.q
(360) 407-6435
Technical Review Committee: Mark Blosser, P.E., City of Olympia,
TRC Chairperson,
mbIosser(@ci.oIvm9ia.wa.us
(360) 753-8320
Page 6
a Sediment Trap Sizing per DOE
a. Basin "A"
0
b. Basin "B"
40
31
0
0
0
SILT TRAP SIZING & ANALYSIS
Basin "A" Sediment Trap Sizing Calculations (per DOE 2001 SWMM)
The proposed detention/ water quality pond will be utilized as the sediment pond.
The total contributing area to the proposed sediment pond is approximately 1.22 acres.
The sediment pond is sized for the developed 10-year / 24-hour design storm.
Steps
a. Discharge rate: Site Dev. Peak 10-Year Flow to Trap = 0.476 cfs
Construction Area Tributary to Pond = 1.22 acres
%Site to Trap 1.22 ac /2.25 ac 54%
Surface Area (SA)
SA = 1.2 Q10yr/24hr / Vsed
SA = 1.2 x 0.476/ 0.00096
Where V sed is the settling velocity.
SA = 595 Sq Ft
Pond L = 2 W
L*W = 595 SF
2 * WA 2= 595 SF
Top W 17.25'
Top L 35'
Surface Area 603.75 sf
Minimum Depth @ 3: 1 = 2.0 Feet
b. Sizing the De -watering Mechanism:
(Riser pipe)
The diameter shall be the minimum necessary to pass the pre -developed 10-
yr/24-hr design storm. Use Figure 111.2.3.8 Riser inflow curves (DOE) to determine this
diameter (h = one foot).
Q (10yr/24hr pre.dev.) = 0.476 cfs
Per figure 111.2.38 of the DOE manual, the minimum riser diameter is 12 inches
to convey this flow rate.
Due to the confined nature of this commercial property, and the extensive
existing paving that will remain around the perimeter of the Basin "A" construction area,
this Developer will install the Detention Pipe system early in the construction process to
provide the required scaling & surface area. The Detention Pipe will be cleaned when the
risk of erosion has passed and placed into permanent operation.
155 If of 84" (T-0") CMP @ 38.5 cf/ft = 5,967.0 ef
SA 7.0'x 155' 1,085 sf > 604 sf at mid depth
Depth = 35 '
Volume = 5,967/2 2,983 cf
32
9
SILT TRAP SIZING & ANALYSIS (cont.)
Basin "B" Sediment Trap Sizing Calculations (per DOE 2001 SWMM)
The proposed detention/ water quality pond will be utilized as the sediment pond.
The total contributing area to the proposed sediment pond is approximately 0. acres. The
sediment pond is sized for the developed 10-year / 24-hour design storm.
Steps
a. Discharge rate: Site Q 10yr/24hr = 0.402 cfs
Construction Area Tributary to Pond = 1.03 acres
%Site to Trap 1.03 ac /2.25 ac = 45.8%
Surface Area (SA)
SA
1.2 Q10yr/24hr / Vsed
SA
1.2 x 0.402/ 0.00096
Where V sed is the settling velocity
SA
502 Sq Ft
Pond L =
2 W
L*W =
502 SF
2 * WA 2=
502 SF
Top W
16
Top L
32
Surface Area
512.0 sf
Minimum Depth (a
�), 3: 1
= 2.0 Feet
b. Sizing the De -watering Mechanism:
11. PRINCIPAL RISER
(Riser pjRq)
The diameter shall be the minimum necessary to pass the pre -developed 10-
yr/24-hr design storm. Use Figure IH.2,38 Riser inflow curves (DOE) to determine this
diameter (h = one foot).
Q (10yr/24hr pre.dev.) = 0.402 cfs
Per figure H1.2.38 of the DOE manual, the minimum riser diameter is 12inches
to convey this flow rate.
Due to the confined nature of this commercial property, and the extensive
existing paving that will remain around the perimeter of the Basin "A" construction area,
this Developer will install the Detention Pipe system early in the construction process to
provide the required settling & sufface area. The Detention Pipe will be cleaned when the
risk of erosion has passed and placed into permanent operation.
200 LF of 66" CMP *, 23.8 cf/ft = 4,760 cf
SA 5.5' x 200' 1,100 sf > 512 sf at mid depth
Depth = 2.75 > 2.0'
Volume = 4,760 cf /2 2,983 cf
33
33
FIRM
e000
IPA
Ell
�0000, 3 1
27
1 247
.000,
A W/j
MY
1/4
Yff,
a
0
1
N
AB
W
Y/F
��Jr
Aff)Y/F/
moll
WJYIJ NO, VAIJ I I
I I I i me
August 2001 Volume 11 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-103
0
Principal Spillway: Determine the required diameter for the principal
spillway (riser pipe). The diameter shall be the minimum necessary to
pass the pre -developed I 0-year peak flow (Q 10). Use Figure 4.28 to
determine this diameter (h = I -foot). Note: A permanent control structure
may be used instead oj'a temporary riser.
Emergency Overflow Spillway: Determine the required size and design
of the emergency overflow spillway for the developed 100-year peak flow
using the method contained in Volume 111.
Dewatering Oriflce: Determine the size of the dewatering orifice(s)
(minimum 1 -inch diameter) using a modified version of the discharge
equation for a vertical orifice and a basic equation for the area of a circular
orifice. Determine the required area of the orifice with the following
equation:
A, (2h) 0-'
0.6x360OTg �J
where Ao orifice area (square feet)
As pond surface area (square feet)
h head of water above orifice (height of riser in feet)
T dewatering time (24 hours)
9 acceleration of gravity (32.2 feet/second 2)
Convert the required surface area to the required diameter D of the orifice:
D = 24x 13.54xVI7A
The vertical, perforated tubing connected to the dewatering orifice must be
at least 2 inches larger in diameter than the orifice to improve flow
characteristics. The size and number of perforations in the tubing should
be large enough so that the tubing does not restrict flow. The orifice
should control the flow rate.
0 Additional Design Specifications
The pond shall be divided into two roughly equal volume cells by a
permeable divider that will reduce turbulence while allowing
movement of water between cells. The divider shall be at least one-
half the height of the riser and a minimum of one foot below the top of
the riser. Wire -backed, 2- to 3-foot high, extra strength filter fabric
supported by treated 4"x4"s can be used as a divider. Alternatively,
staked straw bales wrapped with filter fabric (geotextile) may be used.
If the pond is more than 6 feet deep, a different mechanism must be
proposed. A riprap embankment is one acceptable method of
separation for deeper ponds. Other designs that satisfy the intent of
4-104 Volume /I — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention August 2001
u Gravity Wall Loading Calculations
34
�,-
�d4 6 L
C- r
L7/
41 2-7;
Z_- Z
pC�, -;�- e�,C��p lb/Ft-
7E�
C., r-) F4-
s- �p 62
. . ....... . .
, IR, c
WAS
C%- IIE�lo �
C- -,c �— Slot 040�
EXPIRES 0'9/11/
A-7
7-
4)c L- 7'11-.
Ct,4 e-C.
APPLICATION CARD No . ......................................
for
.,y of Ednm%i..%..X'' 811)E SEWIM PERMT
EASEMENT No . ............ ---------- ...............
OUTSIDE INSIDE E] REPAIRS C]
f
OWNER...... ----------- - - --------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR ......................................................................... ------------ —l-'l ------- PERMIT No.
STREET
HOUSENo . .......... - E ............. ........ ................. AVENUE LOT No . ................................................. I ..................... BLOCK No . ...............................................
NAMEADD . ............................................................................... . ..................................................... ----------------------
LL.
Date
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED .....
Ili 46 A
DEPOSIT, $ .................................
Approved:
DATE . .....
By-------------------------------------------------------------------
EASEMENT No . ..................
City of% Edmonds
SIDE IRS 0
REPA.
OUTSIDE 0
No
Z..42,
�ev .....
.......... PERMIT
... IZZI ...... ................. CONTRACTOR ... -
-O)ArNER'.: ..... STREET ......
....
BLOCK No ........................... .........
HObE ........
S No . .....
. ................................ AVENUE LOT No.
......
. ..... ................
NAME ADD ......... 16
,:� I
rr)
I V-)
\ApP ved:
Date
--$ ........ 4 y
DEP4SSIT; B
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED .......................... D Af E ......
SEWER WORK OjtDER ISSUED ......... .... ............... ..
PPR(
APPUcATION CARD No . .......
f Edmond-i lor ...............
................
SEDE SEWFp. pERN[IT
OUTSIDE INSIDE REPAIRS 0 EASEMENT No - ------------------------------
OWNER ..... —3 Z'- .......
....... ............................................. CONTRACTOR .................
............................................. PERMIT No.
............
HOUSE No. ............ STREET
............ 4
AVENUE LOT No . ......
13LOCK No . ........................
-----------------------
cq, . 4. -7 ---------- ------
NAME ADD . .....................
cl� ............
-�X.z ..........................................................
Date
IjAC
KFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ..........................
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED
------------------------------
........ DEPOSIT, $ .................. ; ..........................
3PROVED.
Approved:
DATEEY .................................................................
.. ..... ...... .... ......
7
2
4DDR , �ft�
..........
........... ........
alune�,'ClEevr ..... .. ....
.................... ........
ONT
�p -�C RAC
granto. t er...
_.qp . I _. I C0114-truct
.O�jb X ... 2.7 -Lon ..
. . ................ 196
-in—a'40C- --- *.*9 1, .. : . . . ....... . .
s for
drdance -Witi, ...... d
aYs, t6AEO' R_
��P4,batlon On Jile and, governth NNECT. �L -iilde� swr,
A TT
CA ordlia
__�,LE�D TO.-TH nC..es...
;N6 E. FOLLOWING:.
may k'
19ZZI: b
0 en�ployed - I,, �taln, a -permit to, co
MRTJff; uct.stpe.-sewdrinstreet,area-b rptruc
, full. I�Mrm�tlo; i o not. covej' �n�, e- Property line. ..A I I
Top dns�d' 61de Se;��"
NOT Portion of_--sbWe�.�: bef6jj:� it c 'POritradtor- must
-Of'side ie;wer must. have at I -I - - :- - 11'""b ; _ en
0*90 f'and Regulat een 1]
..... .. ons g0ver7iffig :-Ide. nspedtid
'N -t 3'
o.bends in grade sh&r eas - 0 1 seyvers wj� en YOU
be
will.. -permitted. - get permit
4 -than nches cbverajo�-at,propert�
I --i - PeE I
—Trefiches,,In street - must J2 *Inches. Ins
-"ter set !j!:ProP . erty line
allure -due- to Improper bl� tied' and surfac rniMmurn gr do
work which. e of street .. ._.Of�29..
may* dev tored to Original c
elOP Wlthin one Yearres Cc'
is unlawful to alter.or any other,w'ork than is Pr 01"completion.' . x �!ors. she
onditlofi. n t a
IL: 60*'reePOnBI ble I
urtena ces-except to'Insert the �l
P n do
pe into the jyye-. -for In the Perm t,: or -to d - o
anyr- work
On_thp_�rmij-
Its- ap-
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects
11 STREETF:I:L:EJ
Name: 1,1 vi A I dC.,Vvn 4 Y)
Date: 01 .1(p --poo+
SiteAddress: V+�7,9 ttW-f 92
Plan Check#: BLD-2006-
Project Description: Add 1.7 a*1tcmvia-4-M ftfsrtivi Pole.
(Ma"001-e, W1 eQLAX0 e r2 IeUA izg�
Use(s) Proposed: WCr, Nh CVD
Aliowe Use: COS NO)
CUP File Number:
To Allow What Uses:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES
Reduced Site Plan Provided: f)s NO)
Zoning:
Map Page: 0 0 (0
Comp Plan Designation: VWA�dtl 99 k
mn- N 0 de.-*
Corner Lot: (YES / NO)
Flag Lot: (YES / (a
ADB File Number (date waived):
Lot Area: J11 . 4 5' f A ri
Plans Match AD13 Approved: (YES / NO)
Shoreline. Required: (YES
Critical Areas Determination #:
El Study Required
11 Waiver
SEPA Determination:.
El Exempt
Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake
Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form).
Re Setbacks
Street:
Side:
Side:
Rear:
A citual Setbacks
Street:
Side:
Side:
Rear:
Lot Coverage/FAR Required:
Lot Coverage/FAR Provided:
Lot Coverage/FAR Calculations:
Building h�t:
Datum Point:
Datum Elevation:.
Maximum Height:
Actual Height:
Subdivision:
Lot Aggregation Required:
Landscaping
Landscaping Matches ADB Approved:
Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO)
Bond Amount (100% Bid):
Plan Review By: ge;w av,�
16- PLANNING DATA 46
New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects
STREET=FILE
Commercial Parking
Analysis
Business Name
Type/Use
Pairking
Ratio
Tenant
Area
Required
Parking
Total Parking Required. -
Total Parking Provided.-
4��Famfly ParkingAnal is
# Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit
Parking Ratio
# Units
Required
Parking
Studio
1.2/D.U.
I Bedroom/
1.5/D.U.
2 Bedrooms
1.8/D.U.
3+ 2,6/drooms
2.0/D.U.
1
Total Parking Required. -
Total Parking Provided. -
Other
L lob Owed fVWW P0 "4.
Plan Review By: g-.e;w aa�
11
Oct-10-00 02:19P
(b P .02 -
US WEST WIRELESS CORPORATION
Geotechnical Engineering
Evaluation
415D —Nelson Campbell
Volkswagen
Edmonds� Washington
WA99-2698
September 1999
RECEIVED
DEC 19 2006
BUILDING DEPT.
STREET FILE
�'.)-00
US West Wirel,-s;
ADaPT '7�;. No, WA90 -2698
�,t�i_:nrnber 7,1999
Page 6
0
AMPT Engineering, Inc.
Bearing PressLzcs: A maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,500 pounds per square foot can be
used for static loads to minimize foundation settlement. For shallow footings, the amount of settlements
.A-,Il takc place is directly related to the size of the footing for a given bearing pressure. Depending
on the allowable sctilement that can be tolerated, higher bearing pressure may be recommended. We can
contacted to provide reconunendations for higher bearing pressures, if desired, for this site. This
rporates a factor of safety of 1.5 or more and can be increased by one-third to
accommodate transirnt wind or seismic loads. We expect that uplift loads will be resisted by the dead
load of t`..x -mat foundation, as well as the weight of soils covering the mat. Native soils used to cover the
mat and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density could be
assumed to have a unit density of 110 pcf.
P - 03
la- isz;-L� L�esistan4� : Lateral loads on the foundation caused by seismic or transient loading conditions may
be resisted by a combination of passive soil pressure against the side of the foundation and shear friction
-sistance: aiong the hase. An allowable base friction coefficient of 0.42 for the silty fine sand -concrete
interface and an allowable passive earth pressure of 300 pounds per -cubic -foot (pef), expressed as an
--mi;valent fluid unit weight, may be applied against that portion of the foundation embedded at least 2
- . "' I � We recommend that the passive earth pressure contribution of the upper 2-feet of
embedment be fully discounted
- L��: We estimate that total post -construction settlements of properly designed mat foundation
bearing on properly prepared subgrades could approach I inch, with differential settlements approaching
Tower DritledNer Fosindalions
As an alternative to the concrete mat foundation based upon the subsurface soil and groundwater
conditions disclosed by our test boring, the tower may also be supported on a drilled pier foundation. The
� I . - - � :. - I .17�ndafions and comments arc provided for purposes of drilled pier design and
construction:
�,.a�-Ttssiyt_Capacitks: We recommend that the drilled pier penetrate at least 15 feet below the ground
surface at the location of boring B-1. For vertical compressive soil bearing capacity. we recornmend
1mi! end bearing capacity presented in Table I below. The allowable end bearing capacity,
I !Jncludes a safety factor of 1.5 or more.
I
2or
0
P - 04
ADaPT Engineering, Inc.
US West Wireless
-'.D--PT WA9Q-2698
Scp-clrnl-tr 7,1999
Page 7
Table I
Allowable End Bearing Capacity
D061-h (feet) j f- 01 '�-R
iA ltifigx etivanc
15-28 6.0 DIB
30 TSF
-11edment depth (in feet) into the bearing layer.
LB = pier diameter (feet).
Fhr,�,�Avitics: For frictional resistance of the drilled piers, acting both downward and in uplift, we
recommend using the allowable skin friction value listed in Table 2. We -recommend that ftictional
:f- '�4� n -,-Cfed in the uppermost 2 feet below the ground surface. The allowable skin friction
vaiu�; piesented includes a safety factor of 1.5.
Table 2
Allowable Skin Friction Capacities
'.Allowable SIdn Friction (tsf)
I)e
0-2 0.0
-7.5
2 0.05
7,5-30 0.70
Lateral CZPXitks: For design against lateral forces acting against the drilled pier, two methods are
tv
pica!)-,r ---d. nc parameter used to select the appropriate design method is the length to pier stiffness
"T. where L is the pier length in inches, and T is the relative stiffness factor. Thc relative stiffhess
factor (1) should be computed by:
�71
T El 0.2
where E = modulus of elasticity (psi)
momcnt of inertia (in')
-.ornstant of horizontal subgrade reaction (pci)
The factors E and I are governed by the internal material strength characteristics of the pier. A
---�:s
. % . entat.ve value of nh for the soil types encountered at this site is presented below in Table 4. Piers
with a L�`T ratio of less than 2 may be assumed to be relatively rigid and acting as a pole. The passive
I
02:20V
ADaPT Engineering, Inc.
US West Wireles-
ADaPT Job N-.)� WA90-2698
pres sure approach may be used for this condition. For piers with a Ulr ratio greater than 2, the
modulus
-:bgrade reaction method is tYPically used. Both of these methods are discussed below:
The Passive pressure approach is conservative by neglecting the redistribution
-.7. and shear forces that develop near the bottom of the pier and contribute to resisting
lateral loads. We lecommend using the allowable Passive earth pressure (expressed as equivalent fluid
unit wiz;:j- - --) listed in Table 3.
Table
Allowable Panive Pressures
r=Depth (feet) Allowable Passive Presswe.(pcf)
0
2-7.5
7.5-28 250
350
ii-�� aliowable passive earth pressure presented in Table 3 may be assumed to be acting over an area
measuring 2 pier diameters in width by 8 pier diameters in depth, neglecting the uppermost 2 feet of
---ibedmen-, 'Dclo%v the ground surface. According to the NAVIFAC Design Manual 7.2. a lateral
deflection equal to abotit o.ol times the pier length would be required to mobilize the allowable passive
7-3511r.- presented al-pove- Higher deflections would mobilize higher passive pressures. When developing
�---Vt! Pressure listed in Table 3, we have incorporated a safety factor of at least 1.5, which
is commonly applied to transient or seismic loading conditions.
Using this method, the pier is designed to resist lateral loads
based on acceptable lateral deflection limits_ For Sandy soils, the coefficient of horizontal subgradc
I I%) ir -.-)nsidered to be directly proportiO.1al to the depth along the pier. The formula to
-."C JC� is kt. -- 11bX, where x is the depth below the ground surface in inches. We recommend using
the value for the constant Of horizontal subgrade reaction (nh) for the various soil types presented in Table
� '-Clow.
COuStRnt of Horizontal Subgrade Reaction (n,)
0-2
2-7.5
7.5-28
P-05
02:20P
0
P. 06
ADaPT Job No, WA90-2698
7. 1999
ADaPT Engineering, Inc.
ConsMiction CowidriatiQns: At this site, near surface soils consist of loose sandy silt grading to very
dense silty ,nd dq)osit at 7.5 feet bgs, which extended to the full explored depths, to a maximum of 28-
feet ugs. In light of hard drilling action encountered below 7,5-foot depth during our exploration phase,
difficult drilling condition should be anticipated. Cobbles or erratic (boulders) are commonly found in
.10though generally favorable soil conditions were encountered, the drilling contractor
shou.,,�� drepare to cas�c the drilled pier excavation to prevent caving or sloughing of pier shaft sidewalls.
Groundwater was not encountered at this site during drilling. In our opinion, depending upon the depth of
pcnetrauon, dewatering of the drilled shaft will not likely be required. Should unanticipated heavy
groundwater inflow.s be encountered during drilling, it may be necessary to pump the accumulated
t,rnunehvtiter prior to pier concrete placement. Alternatively, the use of bentonite slurry could be utilized
-ij pier excavation.
The dr.IlinF Contr,,tctor should be prepared to clean out the bottom of the pier excavation if loose soil is
ot'�_rved or suspectc(l. with or without the presence of groundwater. As a minimum, we recommend that
the drilling contractor have a cleanout bucket on site to remove loose soils and/or mud from the bottom of
J !f groundwater is present and abundant within the pier hole, we recommend that the foundation
c_1*'.i;.'.._ A: ; from the bottom of the hole to displace the water and minimize the risk of
contaminating the concrete mix. The Drilled Shaft Manual published by the Federal Highway
A 4minisu-af ion recornmends that concrete be placed by tremic methods if more than 3 inches of water has
accumulated in t1w.. excavation.
I . -he following cornments, recommendations, and conclusions regarding structural rill are provided for
and con:tntction purposes:
Stmichiral fill includes any rill materials placed under footings, pavements, driveways, and
'4 Typical materials used for structural fill include-. clean. well -graded sand and
gravel (pit -run); cle-An sand; crushed rock- controlled -density fill (CDF); Ican-mix concTc(e; and various
Soil of silt. sand, and gravel. Recycled concrete, asphalt, and glass, derived from pulverized
parew niaterials may also be used as structural fill.
Generally, CDF, and lean -mix concrete do not rcquirc special placement and
compaction procedures. In contrast, pit -run, sand, cnished rock. soil mixtures, and recycled materials
should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and each lift should be
.:-.,_'-)L,ghly compacted with a mechanical compactor. Using the modified Proctor maximum dry density
(ASTM: D-1 557) a- a standard. we recommend that structural fill used for various on -site applications be
--�--mr-icted to the following minimum densities:
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / Mulffamily Projects
SITEADDRESS: ZONING: af
L D?:
USE(S) PROPOSEDa&a, 1*!�E
_aj x-dnA 0,
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE�DETERMINATIQN ISSUED (Y/N)
A
CUP File:Oj -ND-CQ ::��To Allow What Uses?:
0
C CL?
ADB FILE#:
PARKING: C -�O' I
Use:P6.�h
No. Spaces RequiredZ4(�,Oc> 6f
X —acc Lj 0 loor area, # employees etc.)
Use: 0 � ym t X p a- No. Spaces Requi;ed: I do Mh3
X 121, CIL4-7 JV ' 4,
(floor area, # employees, etc.) - 9�0
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.) =
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.) =
Total Required: Actual Provided:
A-r2qtA L19, + 'aS4 la.+ 60
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks: c5,
Front: Left Side: —Right Side: Rear:
Actual Setbacks:
Front: Left Side: —Right Side: 'Rear:
Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No)
MAXIMUM FLO OR AREA:
Maximum Allowed: Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: �Cl� Actual Height:_
Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height:
Datum Point: Datum Elevation:
Elevator Penthouse. > 3 feet over height limit? — If so,VAR#
0
LANDSCAPING:
Matches ADB approved.
Bid Provided? Bond Amount (100% bid):
CRITICAL AREAS #:
96
SEPA DETERMINATION: a—iA—oc4
SHORELINE REQUIRED?: K-'n
Continued ...
1Afibrary\AP1andatNewComm.doc
z
0
z
1-01
DATE: PLAN CHK#:- 0(4 - cx-)c,
NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: b,
ADBFILE#: 0?)--if?3c) OR DATE WAIVED:
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN:
SU BDIVISION-'�
LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: L/A,-X, ecl-nc� -tt:- LA
REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X1 1) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE?
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
cl "s
1Afibrary\^P1andatNewComm.doc
OV EDAI
C
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS - WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220
I %,)Vj http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: Addition (600 sq. ft.) and showroom renovation (420 sq.ft) to the existing Campbell —
Nelson Volkswagon auto sales. Site address is 24329 Hwy 99 (City of Edmonds File No. ADB-99-210).
Proponent: Cafletti Architects for Campbell — Nelson VW
2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Location of proposal, including street address if any: 24329 Hwy 99, Edmonds
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
XX There is no comment period for this DNS.
This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from
the date below. Comments must be submitted by '1999.
Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson
Position/Title: Planning Supervisor
Phone: 425-771-0220
Address: City of Edmonds
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Date: i ( (f LITr Signature'��—� LA-9
Y—X You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North,
Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than may . 2—cf, 1999, by filing a written appeal citing the
specific factual reasons for the appeal. The appeal submittal must also include the required fees and
mailing list. Please contact the Planning Division for specific submittal requirements.
XX Posted on —tJn - I C� , 1999, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services
Building, and the Edmonds Post Office.
XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist.
RECEIVED
OCT 3 0
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTP
CITY OF EDMONDS
Pagel of3
ADB-99-210 DNS.DOC
CREATED ON 11/12/99 12:20 PM
0
Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist:
XX Environmental Review Section XX
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
XX Kurt Campbell
24329 Hwy 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
Attachments
pc: File No. ADB-99-2 10
SEPA Notebook
0
Carletti Architects Attn: Peter Carletti
2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Page 2 of 2
ADB-99-210 DNS. DOC
CREATED ON 11/12/99 12:20 PM
SEPA APPLICATION Go Page I
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
Fee Paid:19K--
Receipt No. li�
—LV-04
A.BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Campbell Nelson Volkswagen Excelsior Henderson Addition and Dealership Showroom Remodel
2. Name of applicant
Kurt Campbell
c/o Carletti Architects, P.S.
24329 Highway 99 A,ln
Edmonds, WA 98026 DEV&L0PAf
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ory E"O SE
OPEC) RVjCc
c/o Carletti Architects, P.S. S
2204 Riverside Drive, Suite 270
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
(360) 424-0394
Contact:
Peter Carletti
4. Date checklist prepared:
Monday, November 0 1, 1999
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Edmonds, Washington
6. Proposed project timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
We will apply for a building permits in early December, 1999 for the motorcycle addition and showroom
remodel. We will begin construction on the project around January 15, 2000, assuming that we have all
jurisdictional approvals, ADB Review, and SEPA issues resolved.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with
this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal.
We will be submitting a Critical Areas Checklist to the City of Edmond for their review of the site, with regards
to Critical Areas.
9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 2
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nel 11101/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
10.. List any government approvals 0 r permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known.
Building permit; mechanical, electrical and plumbing permits; Architectural Design Review Board approval.
11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including th e proposed uses and the size of the project and
site. There are several questions later in this checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your
proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
The site is an existing commercially developed site that has an existing automobile dealership and service
facility, along with an existing used parts, service repair yard and used car buildings. We are proposing an
addition on to the used parts and service building of approximately 600 square feet. This addition will be one-
story wood frame construction and will house a new motorcycle dealership for Excelsior Henderson
Motorcycles. This franchise will be owned and operated by the same owners as Campbell Nelson Volkswagen.
In addition, in part two of the project we will be expanding at the existing automobile dealership building. The
expansion will consist of enclosing an existing space of approximately 420 square feet with store front that is
currently outside display area covered by the existing roof structure and is directly part of the showroom and
dealership building.
12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a
range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map if possible. While you should submit any plans required by
the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applicati ons related to this checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit
application).
The address of the existing dealership is 24329 Highway 99, Edmonds, Washington, 98026. The site is located
on the intersection of 244" Street SW (North 205' Street), and Highway 99. The legal description for the entire
properties are Parcels A, B, C, D, and E. Please see the attached legal description and vicinity map.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (Indicate one): (flat), rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous,
other.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate % slope)?
4% .
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agriculture soils, please specify and note any prime farmland.
Alderwood Urban Land Complex, 2 — 8 % slope.
SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
%
Page 3
11/01/99
2. Air
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
No.
e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
Based upon an average stripping depth of 12" and a gravel foundation depth of 12", approximately 22
cubic yards of excavation and approximately 25 cubic yards of fill are anticipated for compaction and
placement of the building foundation, slab, and footings for the motorcycle shop addition. All of the
excavation and fill will occur under existing impervious surfaces, which are paved and/or have
temporary buildings on them. The source of input fill will be provided from an off -site source that is
unknown at this time. No fill or excavation will occur with the showroom expansion.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No. Due to the small nature of the excavation and the fact that the site is approximately 98%
impervious, no erosion could occur as a result of the construction activities.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
The existing site area totals 4.4 acres. The existing impervious surfaces of the site are approximately
98%. The new motorcycle shop addition is 600 square feet and will remove existing impervious
surfaces that are either paved or have existing temporary building located upon them. Tle addition at
the dealership showroom is under existing roof canopy impervious surfaces. It totals 420 square and
will replace existing impervious surfaces.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
As previously mentioned, the chance of erosion is minimal or non-existent. If erosion were to occur
due to a large rain storm, control measures will conform to the City of Edmonds standard and will be
implemented on site.
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automotive, odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Normal emissions associated with construction activities, including a backhoe and small neurnatic
tools.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
SEPA APPLICATION % % Page 4
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any:
During construction, construction vehicles will be maintained so that they are operating efficiently.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round
and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetlands)? If yes, describe type,
provide names, and if known, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters?
If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
N/A
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
None.
4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year flood plain? Note location on the site plan, if any.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe
the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities if known.
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ;
agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)
are expected to serve.
None.
SEPA APPLICATION % Page 5
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff and storm water method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, please describe
Storm water run-off from the proposed building addition will be collected through tight lines on -site
and will be piped and tied into the existing storm water syste m on -site. The storm water run-off that
will be created by the new roof on the building w ill be cleaner quality water than that of the existing
asphalt surfaces it will be replacing. The showroom addition will result in no new water run-off.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
None. The proposed additions replace existing impervious surfaces and, as previously mentioned, the
new water run-off will be cleaner than that of the existing paved impervious surfaces that will be
replaced.
4. Vegetation
ai Check or Indicate types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
x shrubs
grass
pasture
.crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
None.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
W
SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nel4*
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
age 6
11/01/99
P
d.. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or.
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
We will be doing minimal landscaping around the perimeter of the new building addition, making
an attempt to improve the landscaping standards of the site, which are currently non -conforming.
5. Fish and Wildlife
Indicate any birds and animals which have been observed on or known to be on or near the
site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, (songbirds), other -
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site.
None known.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain:
Not to our knowledge.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. , What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,
etc.
Electricity for lighting and cooling, natural gas for heating.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
An energy efficient building will be designed and constructed according to the NREC requirements.
d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any?
See 6c above.
to % Page 7
SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architect
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
Some very small quantities of motor engine oil will be generated through the servicing of motorcycles
on -site.
b. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services will be required.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Any of the amounts of waste oil generated from servicing the motorcycles will be collected in an
approved storage container and will be disposed of off -site by an authorized disposal agency.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. *hat is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currently occupied by an existing automobile dealership with retail sales and service
facilities. There are a:lso two other minor accessory structures related to used car sales'on the property.
The motorcycle addition will be attached to an existing used auto parts and detail shop building. The
showroom expansion will be under existing roofed areas at the dealership building. The site is located
on the intersection of Highway 99 and 205' Street. There are currently other existing commercial
establishments to the north, south, east and west. Activities in this area range from auto/commercial to
retail sales and/or service transaction facilities.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture purposes? If so, describe
Not to our knowledge.
c. Describe any structures on the site
As previously mentioned, there are existing retail auto sales, service facility buildings, and used parts
detail buildings on the site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what
Yes, the small lean-to structure of approximately 200 square feet on the west -end of the building will
be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
CG — General Commercial.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Highway 99 Corridor Development.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 8
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson % 11/01199
APPLICANT: c/o Carle"i Architects
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No.
i. What are proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
The proposal is compatible with current comp plan designation and matches other current commercial
activities and uses located within this zone and area.
j. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Two people will work in the proposed motorcycle addition. The showroom expansion at the
automobile dealership will result in no additional employees.
k. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
1. What are proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement or other impacts, if any:
None.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing.
None.
c. What are proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
10. Noise
a. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
Auto traffic from 205'h Avenue and automobile traffic from Highway 99.
SEPA APPLICATION C*
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson
APPLICANT: c/o Carle"i Architects
%
Page 9
11/01/99
b. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term
or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours
would come from the site
7:30 am — 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, will be typical construction hours. Upon completion of
construction, the site will be occupied by the business operation from approximately 7:30 am — 7:30
pm, Monday through Sunday.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
During construction: Equipment to be fitted with noise suppression mufflers as required by law.
After installation is complete: No measures will be provided to reduce or control noise impacts, as it is
non -applicable.
11. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal
exterior building material(s) proposed?
The tallest portion of the proposed motorcycle addition will be at an average height of 18' 0". The
principal building materials include aluminum storefront windows, steel metal canopies, EIFS, exterior
insulating finish systems, synthetic stucco, and metal siding. The dealership showroom expansion will
be storefront glazing and synthetic stucco to match the existing showroom.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any?
The project minor and will require a review by the Architectural Design Board.
12. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None.,
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Any exterior wall pack lighting or soffit lights will be equipped with cut-off throw devices and the
distribution will not be allowed to produce glare to surrounding properties.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 10
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell NO., 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
13. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Various City parks.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
14. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on the site.
None observed or known.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None proposed.
15. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
L
205'h Avenue runs east/west along our south property. Highway 99 runs north/south along our east
property line. Please refer to the attached site plan.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
No. The approximate distance to the nearest bus stop is 250'.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many rould the project
eliminate?
The completed motorcycle addition project will have parking stalls for a total of three cars. There are
no car parking stalls being eliminated by the addition. The showroom addition will have no additional
parking stalls created.
cft-P4Z 3
SEPA APPLICATION % Page I I
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to any existing roads or
streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
No new streets or roads will be required. No modification or improvements of existing curb cuts will
be required for our proposal.
e. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,
indicate when peak volumes would occur.
The proposed addition for the motorcycle shop will result in very minor vehicular traffic trips being
added to the project site. The showroom expansion under the existing overhange will result in no
additional vehicular trips generated.
g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
No adverse traffic impacts are anticipated by either project.
16. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
The proposed addition for the motorcycle shop will not cause any increased need for public services.
The showroom expansion will not cause any increased need for public services, as the site is currently
being served.
b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, 4f any.
Energy efficient design and fixtures, and water saving fixtures.
17. Utilities
a. Indicate utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other:
b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
The power is to be provided by Snohorriish County P.U.D., the gas is to be provided by Puget Sound
Energy, telephone services are to be provided by GTE, water is to be provided by the City of
Edmonds, sewer is to be provided by the dity of Edmonds, cable service is to be provided by
Chambers Cable TV.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 12
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell NelsO % 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carle"i Architects
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on
them to make its decisions/I /-) /I
Sign
Date Submitted: I 1�r//
OV E Q 4
CITY OF EDMONDS
[D
220
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - ]EDMONDS - WA 98020-025) 771-0
S10 http://www.ci.edi�onds.wa.us Lry
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: Addition (600 sq. ft.) and showroom renovation (420 sq.ft) to the existing Campbell —
Nelson Volkswagon auto sales. Site address is 24329 Hwy 99 (City of Edmonds File'No. ADB-99-210).
Proponent: Carletti Architects for Campbell — Nelson VW
2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Location of proposal, including street address if any: 24329 Hwy 99, Edmonds
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a piobable significant adverse impact on the
environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
Y—X There is no comment period for this DNS.
This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from
the date below. Comments must be subiriitted by '1999.
Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson
Position/Title: Planning Supervisor VZ5C
Phone: 425-771-0220 FjV5D
Address: City of Edmonds jUN 0 6 2000
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020 c)E\IEL OPMENT Srr-R\jiCES r-TR.
CITy OF EONJONDS
Date: I e PL01 Signature.�:�
YIX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North,
Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than QN . V1, 1999, by filing a written appeal citing the
specific factual reasons for the appeal. The appeal submittal must also include the required fees and
mailing list. Please contact the Planning Division for specific submittal requirements.
XX Posted on Q" - I C� , 1999, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services
Building, and the Edmonds Post Office.
Y—X Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist
Page I of 3
ADB-99-210 DNS. DOC
CREATED ON 11/12/99 12:20 PM
10
Mailed to the followinp- alon2 with the Environmental Checklist:
X nvi dmen6l Review Section XX
\E ro
U b7e�;artmen—t of Ecology
P.O. Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
XX Kurt Campbell
24329 Hwy 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
Attachments
pc: File No. ADB -99-2 10
SEPA Notebook
Carletti Architects Attn: Peter Carletti
2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Page 2 of 2
ADB-99-210 DNS. DOC
CREATED ON 11/12/99 12:20 PM
SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
Page I
11/01/99
A.BACKGROUND
Fee Paid: '� (�"<-
00
Receipt Noj-�-:?J�
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Campbell Nelson Volkswagen Excelsior Henderson Addition and Dealership Showroom Remodel
2. Name of applicant
Kurt Campbell
c/o Carletti Architects, P.S.
24329 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026 V
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: op 1vt S6
OP 4) R v1Cc
c/o Carletti Architects, P.S. Ajov� S
2204 Riverside Drive, Suite 270
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
(360) 424-0394
Contact:
Peter Carletti
4. Date checklist prepared:
Monday, November 0 1, 1999
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Edmonds, Washington
6. Proposed project timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
We will apply for a building permits in early December,* 1999 for the motorcycle addition and showroom
remodel. We will begin construction on the project around January 15, 2000, assuming that we have all
jurisdictional approvals, ADB Review, and SEPA issues resolved.
7. Do youhave any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with
this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal.
We will be submitting a Critical Areas Checklist to the City of Edmond for their review of the site, with regards
to Critical Areas.
9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell $N,.�.
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
Page 2
11/01/99
10.. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known.
Building permit; mechanical, electrical and plumbing permits; Architectural Design Review Board approval.
11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and
site. There are several questions later in this checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your
proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
'Me site is an existing commercially developed site that has an existing automobile dealership and service
facility, along with an existing used parts, service repair yard and used car buildings.' We are proposing an
addition on to the used parts and service building of approximately 600 square feet. This addition will be one-
story wood frame construction and will house a new motorcycle dealership for Excelsior Henderson
Motorcycles. This franchise will be owned and operated by the same owners as Campbell Nelson Volkswagen.
In addition, in part two of the project we will be expanding at the existing automobile dealership building. The
expansion will consist of enclosing an existing space of approximately 420 square feet with store front that is
currently outside display area covered by the existing roof structure and is directly part of the showroom and
dealership building.
12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a
range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map if possible. While you should submit any plans requiredby
the agency, you'are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit
application).
The address of the existing dealership is 24329 Highway 99, Edmonds, Washington, 98026. The site is located
on the intersection of 244t' Street SW (North 205' Street), and Highway 99. The legal description for the entire
properties are Parcels A, B, C, D, and E. Please see the attached legal description and vicinity map.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (Indicate one): (flat), rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous,
other.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate % slope)?
4%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agriculture soils, please specify and note any prime farmland.
Alderwood Urban Land Complex, 2 — 8 % slope.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 3
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
2. Air
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
No.
e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
Based upon an average stripping depth of 12" and a gravel foundation depth of 12", approximately 22
cubic yards of excavation and approximately 25 cubic yards of fill are anticipatpd for compaction and
placement of the building foundation, slab, and footings for the motorcycle ihop addition. All of the
excavation and fill will occur under existing impervious surfaces, which are paved and/or have
temporary buildings on them. The source of input fill will be provided from an off -site source that is
unknown at this time. No fill or excavation will occur with the showroom expansion.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No. Due to the small nature of the excavation and the fact that the site is approximately 98%
impervious, no erosion could occur as a result of the construction activities.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
The existing site area totals 4.4 acres. The existing imp ervious surfaces of the site are approximately
98%. The new motorcycle shop addition is 600 square feet and will remove existing impervious
surfaces that are either paved or have existing temporary building located upon them. The addition at
the dealership showroom is under existing roof canopy impervious surfaces. It totals 420 square and
will replace existing impervious surfaces.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
As previously mentioned, *the chance of erosion is minimal or non-existent. If erosion were to occur
due to a large rain storm, control measures will conform to the City of Edmonds standard and will be
implemented on site.
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automotive, odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Normal emissions associated with construction activities, including a backhoe and small neurnatic
tools.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 4
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/CampbeIN, 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any:
During construction, construction vehicles will be maintained so that they are operating efficiently.
3. Water
a. Surface:
'Al
1) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round -All,
and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetlands)? If yes, describe type,
provide names, and if known, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters?
If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
N/A
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or. removed from
surface water or Wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
None.
4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year flood plain? Note location on the site plan, if any.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe
the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities if known.
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...
agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)
are expected to serve.
None.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 5
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Ca rletti- Architects
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff and storm water method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, please describe
Storm water run-off from the proposed building addition will be collected through tight lineson-site
and will be piped and tied into the existing storm water syste m on -site. The storm water run-off that
will be created by the new roof on the building will be cleaner quality water than that of the existing
asphalt surfaces it will be replacing. The showroom addition.will result in no new water run-off.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
None. The proposed additions replace existing impervious surfaces and, as previously mentioned, the
new water run-off will be cleaner than that of the existing pave d impervious surfaces that will be
replaced.
4. Vegetation
a. Check or Indicate types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
-evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
x shrubs
-grass
asture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bultrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed'or altered?
None.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell I$N41s
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
Page 6
11/01/99
List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or,
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
We will be doing minimal landscaping around the perimeter of the new building addition, making
an attempt to improve the landscaping standards of the site, which are currently non -conforming.
5. Fish and Wildlife
a. Indicate any birds and animals which have been observed on or known to be on or near the
site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, {songbirds), other. -
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site.
None known.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain:
Not to our knowledge.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be u sed for heating, manufacturing,
etc.
Electricity for lighting and cooling, natural gas for heating.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
An energy efficient building w ill be designed and co nstructed according to the NREC requirements.
d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any?
See 6c above.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 7
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
Some very small quantities of motor engine oil will be generated through the servicing of motorcycles
on -site.
b. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services will be required.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Any of the amounts of waste oil generated from servicing the motorcycles will be collected in an
approved storage container and will be disposed of off -site by an authorized disposal agency.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currently occupied by an existing automobile dealership with retail sales and service
facilities. There are also two other minor accessory structures related to use d car sales on the property.
The motorcycle addition will be attached to an existing used auto parts and detail shop building. The
showroom expansion will be under existing roofed areas at the dealership building. The site is located
on the intersection of Highway 99 and 205' Street. There are currently other existing commercial
establishments to the north, south, east and west Activities in this area range from auto/commercial to
retail sales and/or service transaction facilities.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture purposes? If so, describe
Not to our knowledge.
c. Describe any structures on the site
As previously mentioned, there are existing retail auto sales, service facility buildings, and used parts
detail buildings on the site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what
Yes, the small lean-to structure of approximately 200 square feet on the west -end of the building will
be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
CG — General Commercial.
L What is the current comprehensive plan. designation of the site?
Highway 99 Corridor Development.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 8
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell $N6.. 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carle"i Architects
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program. environment designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No.
i. What are proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
The proposal is compatible with current comp pla n designation and matches other current commercial
activities and uses located within this zone and area.
j. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Two people will work in the proposed motorcycle addition. The showroom expansion at the
automobile dealership will result in no additional employees.
k. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
1. What are proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement or other impacts, if any:
None.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing.
None.
c. What are proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
10. Noise
a. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
Auto traffic from 205' Avenue and automobile traffic from Highway 99.
SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
Page 9
11/01/99
b. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term
or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours'
would come from the site
7:30 am — 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, will be typical construction hours. Upon completion of
construction, the site will be occupied by the business operation from approximately,7:30 am — 7:30
pm, Monday through Sunday.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
During construction: Equipment to be fitted with noise suppression mufflers hs required by law.
After installation is complete: No measures will be provided to reduce or control noise impacts, as it is
non -applicable.
11. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal
exterior building material(s) proposed?
The tallest portion of the proposed motorcycle addition will be at an average height of 18' 0". The
principal building materials include aluminum storefront windows, steel metal canopies, EIFS, exterior
insulating finish systems, synthetic stucco, and metal siding. The dealership showroo . in expansion will
be storefront glazing and synthetic stucco to match the existing showroom.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any?
The project minor and will require a review by the Architectural Design Board.
12. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glar6 may affect your proposal?
None.
d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Any exterior wall pack lighting or 'Soffit lights will be equipped with cut-off throw devices and the
distribution will not be allowed to produce glare to surrounding properties.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 10
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell %riels.'. 11101/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
13. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Various City parks.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. -
None.
14. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on the site.
None observed or known.
c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None proposed.
15. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
205'h Avenue runs east/west along our south property. Highway 99 runs north/south along our east
property line. Please refer to the attached site plan.
b. is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
No. The approximate distance to the nearest bus stop is 250'.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many �Vould the project
eliminate?
The completed motorcycle addition project will have parking stalls for a total of three cars. 'Mere are
no car parking stalls being eliminated by the addition. The showroom addition will have no additional
parking stalls created.
SEPA APPLICATION % Page 11
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelson 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti Architects
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to any existing roads or
streets, not including drivewaysl If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
No new streets or roads will be required. No modification or improvements of existing curb cuts will
be required for our proposal.
e. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,
indicate when peak volumes would occur.
The proposed addition for the motorcycle shop will result in very minor vehicular traffic trips being
added to the project site. The showroom expansion under the existing overhange will result in no
additional vehicular trips generated.
g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
No adverse traffic impacts are anticipated by either project.
16. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
The proposed addition for the motorcycle shop will not cause any increased need for public services.
The showroom expansion will not cause any increased need for public services, as the site is currently
being served.
b. What are propos . ed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Energy efficient design and fixtures, and water saving fixtures.
17. Utilities
a. Indicate utilities currently available at the site: electrici!y. natural gas. water -refuse service,
teleph.one,.sanitgy sewer, -septic system, other: I
b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
The power is to be provided by Snohomish County P.U.D., the gas is to be provided by Puget Sound
Energy, telephone services are to be provided by GTE, water is to be provided by the City of
Edmonds, sewer is to be provided by the City of Edmonds, cable service. is to be provided by
Chambers Cable TV.
SEPA APPLICATION Page 12
PROJECT: Excelsior Henderson/Campbell Nelsoi—, 11/01/99
APPLICANT: c/o Carletti- Architects
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on
them to make 1
Signature:
Date Subn
To: The
From:
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
STAFF REPORT
April 19, 2000 Meeting
PLANNING DIVISION
ADVISORY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Karissa:
Planner
Date: . APRIL 14,2000
File No. ADB-99-210
Application by Carletti Architects for Campbell -Nelson Volkswagen for modifications to the main
dealership building. Includes enclosure of the existing canopy on the west side into showroom floor
area and a 1,800 addition on the east side. Proposal includes signage changes. The proposed
project is located at 24329 Highway 99 and is zoned General Commercial (CG).
A. Architect Owner/Applican
Peter Carlett of Carletti Architects. Kurt Campbell of Campbell -Nelson Volkswagen
2204 Riverside Drive Suite 270 24329 Hwy 99
Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Edmonds, WA 98026
B. Site Location: 24329 Hwy 99
C. Introduction: Volkswagen is in the process of creating a uniform image for all of their dealerships.
This is resulting in some changes to the Campbell -Nelson Volkswagen site on the comer of Hwy 99 and
244�h St SW. The existing canopy on the west side of the main building will be enclosed and
incorporated into the primary showroom, adding approximately 420 square feet. The existing service
center on the east side of the main building will be shifted east into a new addition, making room for an
expansion of the office. The main building will undergo exterior changes, to include re -facing portions
with "dryvit", a change in color from gray to white, and a new exterior entrance fagade. A landscaping
element has also been incorporated into the site at the drive aisle entrance./exit points and. around the
parking area designated for customers.
D. Staff Analysis:
Building Description: The showroom will feature a bold new entrance accentuated by a yellow
portal and metal canopy. The large storefront windows will remain,, however, the fascia and columns
will be covered by an E.I.F.S. material... The number and size of dealer identification signs and
Volkswagen symbols will not increase, but some will be moved to make way for the changes.
Page I of 2
ADB Staff Report
Canipbell-Nelson Addition and Exterior Changes
ADB-99-2 10
The project also involves expanding the service center and garage on the east side of the main
building. The existing CMU wall along 244h St SW will be extended to the east to allow for more
interior office space and the service center would be shifted down. Vertical metal siding and roof is
proposed on the east side of the new addition.
A new sign for the Campbell -Nelson parts recycling business which is located in the building to the
north of the dealership. Currently, there are painted letters and graphics on the wall of the building.
The applicants are proposing to replace the painted text with a 42 square foot cabinet sign. The parts
recycling business is separate from the dealership but are part of the Campbell -Nelson. business.
CG Wall Sign
Regulations
Allowed
Proposed
Area
One square foot of sign area
for each lineal foot of wall
TOTAL: 42 sq. ft.
containing the main public
entrance to the building
70 square feet
E. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DESIGN GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE
This site is at the entrance to the City of Edmonds as you drive north on Hwy 99. That portion of Hwy 99
is designated for Corridor Development by the Comprehensive Plan. At the insistence of the Volkswagen
Company, changes are being made to improve the appearance of their dealerships. The applicant has
proposed landscaping improvements in addition to the building face-lift. The applicant has proposed a
project that complies with many of the Corridor Development policies.
1. Policy C. I I Upgrade the architectural and landscape design qualities of the corridor.
2. Policy C. I Provide for focused commercial development along the Highway 99 transportation corridor
3. Policy C.3 Unify the appearance of the area.
H. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the additions and sign for the . Carnpbell-Nelson site as shown on the proposed
site plan, subject to the following conditions: I
1. - The temporary banner/flags on the light poles must be removed as they are prohibited forms of
signage pursuant to ECDC Section 20.60.
• The project appears to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted City policies.
• The proposal meets the intent and purposes of the Zoning Ordinance.
• The proposal satisfies the criteria and purposes of ECDC Section 20. 10 — ADB criteria.
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Existing Site plan
3. Proposed Site Plan
4. Elevations
5. Color rendering and sign breakdown
Page 2 of 2
7--
71-
T
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
'4,j � COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
--ammm— 1�j Public Works a Planning * Parks and Recreation * Engineering
890 - 1 9 q
October 6, 1992
Bob Johnson
1542 Tenth Place North
Edmonds, Washington 98020
SUBJECT: Fire Hydrant Obstruction
Dear R.eside,nt,
LAURA M. HALL
MAYOR
IMZVC�'4j 1 C) - 2 -5-PL
40 re-�j
6F CLZ�JAkIQ
/ jl-L41-
Cz�-? 64LD 1-,-s - 9 .3
City crews have determined that the fire hydrant in front of your
address has been obstructed, according to City of Edmonds Development
Code (copy attached). It is the purpose of this.,code to maintain
visual areas around hydrants as well as to maintai . n adequate operating
space required by Fire Department personnel and maintenance repair
crews.
Please review the code and remove existing obstructions within thirty
(30) days from the date of this notice. If this is not completed, City
crews will be required to remove the obstructions, and the cost of
doing so will be charged to the homeowner.
If You should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Ron Hollan�
Water/Sewer Supervisor
cc: Gary McComas
Noel Miller
HYDR/LET.3/TXTWATER
Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
- - , - - - I , - . - - , : - - - I T T -1 . :.- - .- I-
8 go . 1 99
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works 9 Planning * Parks and Recreation @ Engineering
October 6, 1992
David Niven
731 Puget Lane
Edmonds, Washington 98020
SUBJECT: Fire Hydrant Obstruction
Dear Resident,
LAURA M. HALL
MAYOR
O-�-L �� (N Qv 1 —7 +CN)
ex4a-0 I -s- 93
City crews have determined that the fire hydrant in front of your
address has been obstructed, according to City of Edmonds Development
Code (copy attached). It is the purpose of this code to maintain
visual areas around hydrants as well as to maintain adequate operating
space required by Fire Department personnel and maintenance repair,
crews.
Please review the code and remove existing obstructions within thirty
(30) days from the date of this notice. If this is not completed, City
crews will be required to remove the obstructions, and the cost of
doing so will be charged to the homeowner.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
z - f)
Ron Holland
Water/Sewer Supervisor
f�o 60T
cc: Gary McComas
Noel Miller
HYDR/LET.2/TXTWATER
4
pz.� C9- C
9 Incorporated August
F ( -e-
S
R"E
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES:
Public Works 9 Planning * Parks and Recreation - Engineering
890 . 194
November 13, 1991
Campbell Nelson VW
24329 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
This is to inform you that vehicles are parked over your water meter
which interferes with accurate reading and maintenance of the meter.
This meter is read every month and must be kept clear. Please remove
vehicles to permit free access to the entire meter cover, which is in
accordance with the City Ordinance quoted below:
7.10.050 Access to curb cocks and meter covers.
The Water Division shall have free access to curb cocks and water
meter covers. All persons are prohibited from piling rubbish,
building, or other materials thereon. (Ord. 413, Par. 20;
February 5, 1929).
We will again inspect your meter in thirty (30) days. If, at that
time, the meter is still obstructed, we will be required to have these
vehicles towed and the costs billed to you.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Ron
Holland
Water/Sewer Supervisor
RH/l k
NELSONVW/TXTWATER
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
ET F
CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
250 - 5TH AVE. N. * EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 MAYOR
�7 COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN
Public Works a Planning 9 Parks and Recreation Engineering
C) C5 DIRECTOR
o
November 13, 1991
Campbell Nelson VW
24329 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
This is to inform you that vehicles are parked over your water meter
which interferes with accurate reading and maintenance of the meter.
This meter is read every month and must be kept clear. Please remove
vehicles to permit free access to the entire meter cover, which is in
accordance with the City Ordinance quoted below:
7.10.050 Access to curb cocks and meter covers.
The Water Division shall have free access to curb cocks and water
meter covers. All persons are prohibited from piling rubbish,
building, or other materials thereon. (Ord. 413, Par. 20;
February 5, 1929).
We will again inspect your meter in thirty (30) days. If, at that
time, the meter is still obstructed, we will be required to have these
vehicles towed and the costs billed to you.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
4�
9"(6c"D
Ron
Holland
Water/Sewer Supervisor
RH/l k
NELSONVW/TXTWATER
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
--.- I I I TV I -
z-
Washington State Duane Berentson 51
Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation
District 1 2 //C�
15325 S.E. 30th Place
Bellevue, Washington 98007-6568
(206) 562-4000
R LC'E 1 v 7
,z, D
May 6, 1988
MAY 10 1988
ENGINEERING
Campbell/Ne
P. 0. Box
Edmonds, XA'
Volkswagen
98020
ATTN: /Arne W. Nelson
SR 99 CS 3101
SR 104 Interchange
Campbell/Nelson
Permit General Correspondence
Dear Mr. Nelson:
Your application requesting permission to construct an oil/water separator on
a portion of SR 99 in Snohomish County has been received.
As this portion of SR 99 is a nonlimited access highway and is located within
the corporate limits of the City of Edmonds permits and/or approvals must be
obtained from the city.
Please contact Mr. Tim Wicks at 562-4253 if additional information is needed.
TCW: dp
(f.::Ci:ty:o:f:Edmo
:n :ds)
Sincerely,
L
j _j4L . L luff ) P . E
j ric
Di rict Utilities Engineer
0
0 *
044 1 �� 1�� I
ow"IlEm
205TH & AURORA 9 P.O. BOX 220 * EDMONDS, WA 98020 9 TELEPHONE 778-1131 / 524-6660
March 14.. 1988
Wash State Dept. of Hiways
1532-5 S.E. 3oth Pl.
Bellevue, WA 98007
Att: Tim Wicks,
As per our phone conversation the other day attached is a diagram of the
location of the oil separator in the storm sewer line as requested by the
cities of Mountlake Terrace and Edmonds to prevent pollutants from
entering Lake Ballinger.The most logical location for this unit is at the place
indicated on the diagram between the last catch basin and the main storm
drain in the street. The area of right of way it would be installed in is all
grass and would be restored to its original condition except for access covers
to service the unit from.
Please advise me what will be required from your Dept. to complete this
installation.
Sincerely,
Campbell/Nelson Volkswagen
1--,/ qz'z'
Arne W. N-elson
60
dia
2" Concrete
-, Baffles
go...
611
7-
Inlet
--T 11 .16
13
1 1 1-
28" 2 8 + 16
OIL/WATER
SEPARATOR
MES
10/29/87
- mk�= - -- W
75"
411
4b
4b
_2, V 3 21 9?
205TH&AURORA P.O.BOX220 EDMONDS,WA98020 TELEPHONE 778-1131/524-6660
November 24,1987
RECEIVED
Mr. Jerry W. Hauth, P,..,E. NO" 01987
Hydraulics Engineer
City of Edmonds, ENGINEERING
Civic Center
Edmonds,Wa 98020
Dear Mr. Hauth:
Thank you for your prompt response to our letter of
November 11,1987 regarding improvements to our storm
drain systems.
We have discussed your suggestion of going to a 3.0
inch loading rate with our environmental consultant and
still feel we should remain with our proposed plan.
These are costly additions to our daily expenses and to
tripple or quadruple these expenses with only 12 years
remaining on our present lease, would seem a poor move
from a business standpoint. If these expenditures were
going to increase our sales or cut our expenses we would
Qertainly take a different view. It is difficult to
operate in todays competitive market place with constantly
increasing fixed expenses and it 1§ essential to survival
to hold these to a minimum.,, -
Unless we hear from you to the contrary, we will
proceed with our plans in the near future.
Sincerely,
CAMPBELL NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
Arne W. Nelson
Partner
AWN/lc
AP 7
0 71 " ""' rl�
S � 0'% �: ET F 1. E
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5th AVE. N. * EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES
November 16, 1987
Arne W. Nelson
Campbell/Nelson
P. 0. Box 220
Edmonds, WA. 98020
Dear Mr. Nelson:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
Thank you for the letter dated November 11, 1987 regarding your planned
improvements. I will send a copy of your letter with a copy of this
letter to Bob Aldrich of Mountlake Terrace for his comments.
First of all, I want to thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
It is relatively common news these days to see a large company that has
been charged with a pollution violation. However, when a company takes
the initiative to resolve an existing problem, it is never mentioned in
the news.
The only comment I have about your proposed system is in regards to
anticipation of future water quality standards. If you were to base
your system on a loading rate of 3.0 inches in a 24-hour period, you
would be able to handle up to a 100-year storm. This additional
capacity may ultimately be to your benefit if future legislation
further restricts allowable discharge standards. There are strong
indications this may happen in the near future.
V ry truly y
e a7 s,
JERRY W. HAUTH, P.E.
Hydraulics Engineer
cc: Bob Aldridge, City of Mountlake Terrace
AZVerts
NELSON/TXTST530
PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING
R&EIVED
mov 1 9. 1987
ENGINEERING
205TH&AURORA * P.O.BOX220 * EDMONDS,WA98020 e TELEPHONE 778-1131 / 524-6660
November 11,1987
Mr. Jerry W. Hauth, P.E.
Hydraulics Engineer
City of Edmonds
Civic Center
Edmonds, Wa 98020
Dear Mr. Hauth:
We wish to apprise you of our plans to install
specific equipment to separate oil from our runoff
entering the public storm sewers of Lake Ballinger.
We will install three oil separation sumps, one on
each of the three lines collecting storm runoff from
our facilities. We have assumed a runoff based on one
inch of rain in 24 hours; the sumps have a capacity for
holding 750 gallons for separation. The flows through
the three sumps at this designated peak rainfall are:
West sump (collecting from the parts area,a
portion of the area between the main building and
the back shops, and part of the west parking area)
:7.2 gallons per minute.
Southeast sump (collecting from a portion of back
shops area, the shop portion of the main building,
and some parking and drive areas immediately east of
the main building) : 10.4 gallons per minute.
East sump (collecting a small area from behind
the parts area, and almost all of the east yard con-
taining salvage vehicles) : 12.6 gallons per minute.
As you will note, the retention time for the flows
will be about an hour or more, which is very conservative
and should result in excellent separation of the oil. The
oil will be removed either by pumping for further process-
ing, and/or by absorption with sorbent pads which are
205TH&AURORA * P.O.BOX220 e EDMONDS,WA98020 9 TELEPHONE 778-1131/524-6660
Page 2
Mr.Jerry W. Hauth, P.E.
oleophilic/hydrophobic.* We prefer to maKe our selection
of the removal method as we observe the sumps in operation.
Initially, we will inspect the sumps biweekly, and
then monthly, until we have established a pattern for coll-
ection and removal.
Please inform us (in writing) by December 30,1987, if
you (or your colleagues in Mountlake Terrace) have questions
or comments concerning our plans. We intend to contract
for the installation soon thereafter. Following install-
ation, we welcome your inspection of the system.
Our consultant mentioned that you raised the question
of installing coalescing filters on these streams. His
investigation indicates the capital costs would be three
to four times greater than the separator system described
above; the operation and maintenance costs would also in-
crease.
While these filters may represent. -the latest techno-
logy, the additional cost would place Campbell -Nelson at
a further disadvantage with our competitors located away
from protected waters such as Lake Ballinger. However,
be assured we remain committed to meeting our environmental
responsibilities, and we recognize that future studies and
regulations may mandate an advanced technology.
CAMPBELL NELSON VOLKSWAGEN
allo�' 9VZ--�
Arne W. Nelson
Partner
AWN/lc
-2-5) 87
Ua 2 4 1987 -?K�;?
INGINEERING L" -` -7
205TH&AURORA P.O.BOX220 EDMONDS,WA98020 e TELEPHONE 778-1131 / 524-6660
August 20,1987
Mr. Jerry W. Hauth, P.E.
Hydraulics Engineer
City of Edmonds
Civic Center
Edmonds,Wa 98020
Dear Mr. Hauth:
In response to your letter of February 29th, Campbell -
Nelson Volkswagen has engaged the consulting firm Morris
Environmental Services. We now have a plan to address the
problem of oil in our storm drains.
First, let me inform you that we have discovered a third
storm drain system. It is located in the wrecked vehicle
storage area in the northeast portion of our property. We
do not know yet exactly where this drain discharges, but pre-
sumable it enters the storm sewer system and eventually Lake
Ballinger.
Our current plan is to install three separator sumps -on
the three major outfalls: west of the main building (adjacent
to Highway 99), southeast of the main building, and east of
the paint shop(in the east part of the storage yard).
The separator sumps will be selected to provide adequate
holding time for separation of the oil, with the objective of
reducing the oil content to 20 mg/1 or less in the underflow.
The separated oil will -be pumped from the sumps for recycle
or proper disposal, or will be collected with sorbent pillows.
We are also reviewing our used parts operation to deter-
mine if incidental oil losses can be further reduced, which
will enhance the performanace of the separators.
205TH&AURORA 0 P.O.BOX220 e EDMONDS,WA98020 9 TELEPHONE 778-1131 / 524-6660
Page 2
Mr. Jerry W. Hauth
We intend to proceed with this approach and present our
final plan, with details, to the City by October 31,1987. We
will then implement the plans two months after we are notified
of your acceptance.
Please let us know if we can clarify any of the above
points. As you are aware, Campbell -Nelson Volkswagen has al-
readymade major improvements in our housekeeping, and has
eliminat ' ed antifreeze disposal in the sewer system. We remain
committed to meeting our responsibilities to ensure an improved
environment in our community.
Sincerely,
Campbell -Nelson Volkswagen
Arne W. Nelson
Partner
AWN/Ic
CITY OF EOMONOS
CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 775-2525
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
March 17, 1987
Sam Rayburn
Campbell -Nelson VW
Service Department
24329 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA. 98020
Dear Mr. Rayburn:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
It has been called to my attention that you have .-b�en working with City
staff in identifying sources of the pollution whilch discharge into Lake
Ballinger and corrective measures. I also understand that you intend
to make the necessary changes on your property to'either eliminate or
control the source of pollution from your property.
I want to express, on behalf of the City, our appreciation for your
cooperation. This is a problem that will require the cooperative
effort by everyone in the community. Your positive attitude and
cooperation in helping to solve this problem will not go unnoticed.
Your immediate attention will help establish your business as a member
of the community in taking an active roll in cleaning up our
environment.
Once again, thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
Mayor
JWH/sdt
POLLUTN/TXTST530
FILE 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 a (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES
February 20, 1987
Owners
Campbell A Nelson
24329 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA. 98020
Dear Sirs:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
Visual inspection of the storm drains adjacent to your place of
business has indicated that significant amounts of pollution, primarily
oil, are entering the storm conveyance system that is tributory to
Halls Creek and Lake Ballinger.
This is in violation of City, State, and Federal ordinances and laws.
We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss measures designed to
correct the problem. We would prefer to handle such problems on a
local level with your voluntary cooperation.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me
at my office. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours,
vo �f
JERRY HAUTH, P.E.
Hydraulics Engineer
JWH/sdt
cc: Dave Wright
Washington State Department of Ecology
CAMPNELS/TXTFORMS
PUBLIC WORKS 0 PLANNING
0 PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING
Ll I Y U� LU111.1UNJI
PALTA, -or's D'EPARTMENT., 'ENGff*,_ - i-VISION
jApplj�gIn'l FOR RT-OF-IIAY CO.NSTPUMOIN PFP, I RECEIVED
AR 6 1980
TH . IS PERMIT MUST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR'INSPECTION PURPOSES
Applicant to Complete Part I s A and B Dir. Ut Public Work .
At Permit to.be issued to: Snohomish County P.U.D. No 1 T
For Work at:(address or vicinity)' 24329-Highway 99,*Edmonds
Type of Work to be done: install underground power system
(attach drawing when applicable)
Time' Re.quired — Start: within 40 aays from 3/4/B Finish: one day.
Owner: Bill Blume Volkswagon 085831
Name 24329 Highway 99 W.O. #
Kailij� Ad,&s
mon 98020
City State Zip —Te—lephone Number
Contractor: Snohomish County P.U.D. No. I
Name. State License Number
P. 0. Box 1107
Mailing Address 258-8414
Everett Washington 98206 A. Raino
0
City State Zip Telephone Number Engineer—
B. 1%1`DEH"\ITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this.application, a . grees
to -hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damace'8, or claims of any
kind or description whatsoever, ioreseen or unforeseen, thatomay be made against
the applicant or the CitY.Of Edmonds, or any of. its departments or employees,
including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense
costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit..
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is ;responsible for workmanship and
materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance
of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds hel�l from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until
the final Street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be
t
processed for issuance.to the applicant.
Work is subject to inspection and restoration in accordance with City'Code. A -
24-hour notice is requIred for inspection by Engineering.'Call 775-2525' ext. 220.
I understand that.this permit mu.st"be available at the job site for inspection
purposes at all times.
Signature:
-,I,A Date: i&
Ou-ner or Argent f
TO BE C0.111PLEIED BY ISSUING AGENCY:
Date Issued. o Permit No. ice
Security Bond:_
Time Authorized:
APPROVED By Dat
e