250 4TH AVE S.pdfSim
IM
4 It ...
. .........
I
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF EDMONDS File No- Cu- cl-s(o
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Date. —'?.6
Fee
APPLICATION TO HEARING EWIINER APO'S
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERIMIT Rect. No. 0
HEARING DATE S-jp—?LP
APPLICANT:Liqi,3 Itr+ S. LJM1G14-r0'-,-N ADDRESS 1 Oq IQ #1�vrj2i�t4) IZ-L PHONE
- U
Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: �Ltv--Aq,,, tic-, Ae-
'8e P1 t4e--J+ CK k-M)W- rlk-'-L� a-� L- '+U> ZE '77�9-0033,
OWNER:-2-:S'F0T'f'o-�- OLI�e L. Oiq�LLE�ADDRESS i.!�o 4�iJ Ave. S PHON
LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY e: e- 11'r-I-Aette-j S 4 e- e-:P
T o - b e comple ted by the Planning Division: Use Zone— ItM 1-5
Legal description checked and approved by: Date-.
VICINITY SKETCH: PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EXA�MFLE-
INDICATING NORTH. "S �L- 6 FT P (Z 12IN/
Exarmle:
0 ve-
�&-00 RLD
00
CONDITIONAL USE REEQUESTED:
rjj�� 0 ��Ice-
DETAILS
OF PRO?OSED
USAGE: PletL�;e
'S e. e-
6L
-tL(-,1%eA
S�ee-;L P141,11JEA
Y-ea.v-
Lcw vc[LA%1,%o U-3 L
Signature of AppliL%hnz, Ow-ner or
Represencacive
RELEASE/HOLD HAMLESS AGREEMENT
The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the
City processing.che application agrees to release, indemnifv, d;fend and
hola the City of Edmonds harmless from anv and all damazes and/or claims for
damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from ar.v ac:4-an or
inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or
in part upon false, misleading or incomolece info=ar-ion furnished by the
a-.olican"-, his agents or employees.
PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY
The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its oe-t-mission for public
offtcials ;nd the scaff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subjec:
propercv for the purpose of*insueccion and poscing attendant to clhis
aoollcar-Lon. . 1�9 -
.If
SLgna:ure o: Aanitca��,, Ow-le7 Or
Reoresencacive
Tt, ba firrei,N e 8 '01 e-t IL1LAIJ
Legal Description of Property. Beginning 351.42 feet West
and 125 feet South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast
quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter
of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 E., w.M.7 thence
South 75 feet7 thence West 130 feet7 thence North 75 feet7
thence East 130 feet to the point of beginnincf*, ALSO NNOWN
AS Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 2, Olympic View Addition,
according to the unrecorded plat thereof, situate in
Snohomish County, WA.
Details of Proposed Usage: The existing structure is a one
level two bedroom, one bath house with an attached garage.
We propose to improve the nroperty by interior redecoration
and addition of a wall to create a closed sT)ace in the now
existing dining area. The house will be used as office site
for Dr. Lanita Wright and Dr. Gwen Lewis for the practice
of Psychiatry and Psychology with speciality attention to
children and their families. Appointments will. be made on
hourly basis and patients will be seen by appointment only.
The low volume basis of the practice should not disturb the
current nature of the area. In addition the rear portion of
the property will be converted to a parking area which is
accessed by an alley bordering the rear of the property.
The rear parking will prevent congestion of 4th Ave S street.
Externally the house will be left as it is with the exception
that it will be repainted and the siding extended to the attached
garage to create a unif�,ing effect. The landscaping will be
improved with the addition of new plantings and the pruning
of existing ones. No sigh will be planned except for a sign
indicating the street number. The plan is to leave the house
as much the same as -possible so that it blends with the neighbor-
hood.
At some future date the interior of the garage may be finished
to allow additional space. This would also facilitate a rear
entrance to the building.
FILE 4 C[j-9-86
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal _CQndit-imla . �)p -or *
,rmj.t f —a--p
'r0JQa'aJ
Proponent Tanita Wric1hi-, M 1)_
Location of proposal, including street address, if any.
250 4th Ave. S.
Lead agenc
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a prob-
able significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (tIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decisfon was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on
request.
fj7 There is no comment period for this DNS.
This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(.2); the lead agency will not act on
this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted
by
Responsible official— Quane V. Bowman —
Position/title Assistant C'tv Plannn Phone 771-3202, ext. 254
Address
Da te Februa_7y 21, 1986 ignature 12&1111�p I
I _'� - 4z'
=x You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance
to Hearizi(j Examiner
at 250 5th Ave. N. Eclnnnds, WA 98020
no later than 5:00 p.m. Marcli 3, 1986
by. filing written appo-al, citing reasons
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact - .
Diignp omn_ to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
ox There is no agency appeal.
Y,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST,
purpose or Checklist: I C RC\\', requires all governmental agencies to consider
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.2 statement (EIS) must be
making
the environmental impacts of a proposal beforc , decisions. An environmental impact
prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of
this checklist is to provide inrormation to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce
1, if it can bi� done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
or avoid impacts from thc'proposa
Instructions ror Applicants:
sic information about your proposal. Governmental agen
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some ba
cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring
IS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best de -
preparation of an E
scription you can.
)'ou must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should
vations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you
be able to answer the questions from your own obser
does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap-
really do not know the answer, or if a question
avoid unnecessary delays later
ply". Complete answers to the questions now ma) - and landmark designations. Answer
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline,
these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental anencies can assist you.
riod of time or on
even if you plan to do them over a pe
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal proposal or its environmental
different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your I
effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in-
formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use OF checklist for nonproject proposals: not apply." IN AD -
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does
DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A.BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Professional Office for Practice of Psychiatry and Psychology.
2. Name of applicant: Lanita S. Wright, M.D. -
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
10919 Algonquin Rd. Edmonds, WA 98020 778-5642
4. Date checklist prepared: 2/13/86
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Opening of Office by April 1, 1986
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or furthcr activity related to or connected with this proposal?
If ycs, explain.
Not at this time
-1-
. t.:
8. List any environmental information \ou know about that has been prepared. or will be prepared, directly related to
this proposal.
None
you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the
9. Do
property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain.
No
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
City of Edmonds Conditional Use Permit
Archetecture Boad Approval
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
gencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor-
need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead a.
mation on project description.)
Please see attached information.
5
12. Location of the proposal' Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro-
posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal wou d occur
over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map,
and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
Please see attached informatlon.
EVALUATION FOR
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
AGENCY USE ONLY
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle onc).-��D�, rolling, hilly, stecp slopes, mountainous,
other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Dri.veway slopes 45% from street
-2-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
c. What general types of soils arc found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification or agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime
farmland. 5c� 'at� .
d. Arc there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
I I No
e. Describe'the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro-
posed. Indicate source of rill.
Back portion which will be used for parking will be scraped to clear.
Gravel will be used to cover parking area.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use*? If so, generally describe.
Should not.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surraccs after project
construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)?
I No change in current coverage planned. House covers 10% of lot.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Planting of shrubs, flowers proper drainage.
2. Air
a. What types or emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile.
odors. ind�strial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? ir
any. generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
No major impact expected. Possibly some dust when back is graded.
t
b. Are there any ofr—iite sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal'? If so,
generally describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, ir any:
None
EVALUATION FOR
ONIPLETED BY APPLICANT
TO BE C AGENCY USE ONLY
3.
a. Surracc:
1) Is there any surface ater body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
y car —round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, \%,ctlands)7 If ycs, describe type
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flo\X 's into.
None
o
NVill the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach a\ -ailable plans.
No
3) Btimate the amount of rill and dredoc material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In -
dicate the source of rill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give genera de
scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100—year floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
Do not know.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface -waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals . . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the systern, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
No
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source or runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Only known source storm water. Exi.sting storm drains as provided in streets.
Downspouts- from roof into. ground.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any:
None anticipated.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: �lder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: Fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other
other types of vegetation
0
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Two fruit trees in rear of property will be removed. Other trees and shrubs will be pruned.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
ve-etation on the site, if any:
0
Planting of additional Rhodedendrum) Azalea and possibly other shrubs. Annuals- and
other flowers and bulbs will be used.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been* observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle,,fs ngbird , other: .................................
j=o.
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver. other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other . ............................
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known
-5-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Do not know.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Bird feeders.
6. Eneray and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
L_
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu-
facturing, etc.
Oil furnace for heating.
Fi�eplace for occasional use.
b. "Alould your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
No
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Existing house has double windows. Additional insulation will be used
in attic.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
No.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None anticipated.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None anticipated.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (For example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Traffic and occasional work in the adjacent PUD Substation.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site.
Interior remodeling construction sounds- hammering, sanding, etc. for
a brief period during regular woking hours 8am-5PM for 2 weeks approximately.
U12
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None anticipated.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Currently site has a vacant house on it. Has been used as a resident for one family.
Neighborhood has single family and multiple family residences, a professional office,
PWDs�u�gtatip and -cau� nocTl�sRnds(?l the street commercial buildings.
b. Has I. e C cn use or agri tur dc ribc.
No.
c. Describe any structures on the -site.
840 sq ft two bedroom house with an attached one car garage. Small shed in back.
overhang in back covered with Plastic roofing.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zonin- classification of the site?
High Denisty Multiple Family
F. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Don't Know.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
NA
It. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
Not to my knowledge.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Three
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any:
None
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
Compliance with City of Edmonds Codes.
—7—
i"2
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCV� USE ONLY
9. Housing
a. Approximately how man), units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low—income housing.
None
b. Approximately how man), units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low—income housing.
One previous sih'gle family home.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
No change in current structures height.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Only improvements of existing area planned, mainly painting, plannting e:c.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? %Vhat time of day would it mainly
occur?
None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
c. What existing off —site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
City Park
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
EVALUATION FOR
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op-
portunities to be provided by the project or apblicant, if any:
None
13. Historic and Cultural Presery'ation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local prescr
vation reoisters known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe.
No
b. Generally dcs'cribe any landmarks or evidence or historic, archaeolocical. scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next -to the site.
None
c. Pr000sed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any:
None
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the
existin2 street system. Show on site plans. if any.
4th Ave S. and alley from Walnut street to back of property please see
attached map. Parking planned in back off alley.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop'?
Approximately one block from transit stop.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have'? How many would the
project eliminate'!
New parking spaces 6. None will be eliminated.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or 6trctts. or improvements to existing roads or
streu-s. not inc'luding arive,-va,,',s" If so. generully describe (indicate whether public or
privaEc)- No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail, or air transporta-
tion? If so, acnerally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be gencruted by the completed project'? If
N.
known. indicaLe when peak volumes would occur.
8 to 1Z possible 6 to 8 probable peak volumes
afternoons 1 PM to 6 PM
Ci_
APPLICANT
TO BE COMPLETED BN
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Encourage use of public transit. Parking in rear reducing traffic on street.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro-
tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so. generally describe.
No
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None
16. Utilities
a. Cizclz- _utilities currently available at the site: t,e �Cctricli�t natural ga r{�.fuse seiv;
, , s, �,��a t �r,
y
\�ESI ��aani=y s�e�we ', septic system, other.-----
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the -eneral construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
CP
be needed.
Nothing not already there.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that
the lead agency is realp*g on them tq mak-e its decision.
Signature: A.P� .............................
Date Submitted: .... ..........................................
_10—
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Rezones , Code Changes . Ann.exations etc.
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
*Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements or the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the.typcs of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the itcm at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than ir the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general
terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release or toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
0
Should not alter current impact other than the house has been vacant, so
would return it to previous use level.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
None thought to be needed.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Removal of two trees, addition of new plantings and pruning and clen up of old ones.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, Fish, or marine life are:
Proper lanscape measures.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
None anticipated.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
None
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentati.y sensitive areas or ar-
eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection-, such as parks, wil-
derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural
sites, wetlands, noodplains, or prime farmlands?
No effect.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
None
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans'?
No affect
_11—
I
M
M .1
Proposed measures to avoid Or reduce shoreline and land usc impacts arc:
None
6. Hou, would the proposal be like]y to increase demands on transportation or public ser-
vices and utilities?
Could increase use of public transit.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) arc:
None
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws
or requirements for the protection of the environment.
None known.
—12=
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER LIST
PLEASE LIST ALL STREET ADDRESSES OF RESIDENTS OF PROPERTY
WITHIN SO FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE SITE. ALSO
LIST NAMES AND MAILING ADDRESSES OF OWNERS OF THESE SAME
PROPERTIES. (THIS INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAI�IED FROM THE
COUNTY ASSESSOR I S OFFICE.')
242 4th Ave s
(Condominium Bldg)
Carol Elwell
242 4th Ave S. Apt 1.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Eugene V. & Altrude M. Stime
242 4th Ave S Unit 2
Edmonds, WA 98020
Shoreline Savings
James R. Spence Apt 3
P0 Box 25788
Seattle, WA 98125
Shoreline Savings
Henry Thomson Apt 4
POBox 25788
Seattle, WA 98125
Shoreline Savings
Michael Aleman Apt 5
P0 Box 25788
Seattle, WA 98125
Elizabeth Bell Apt 6
242 4th Ave S
Edmonds, WA 98020
Adjace.nt on the south -No Streej��ddne -)jat� t n
Snohomish county PUD
2320 California
Everett, WA 98201
239 4th Ave S.
Isaac H. & Anna Heffentrager
239 4-th Ave S
Edmonds, WA 98020
247 4th Ave S
Mathilda Anna Trager
247 4th Ave S
Edmonds, WA 98020
251 4th Ave S. 261 4th Ave S
Mrs. Helen 1. Bird Ethyl Fenton
251 4th Ave S. 261 4th Ave S.
Edmonds,WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020
ADJACENT PROPERTY 014NER LIST(Continued)
Vacant Lot on 3rd Ave S
Margaret Dority Estate
Robert Dority, Executor
5613 16th Ave N.E.
Seattle, WA 98105
317 3rd Ave S.
ThL._Mayfield (Cond.iminiums)
Majorie Palace
317 3rd Ave S #101
Edmonds, WA 98020
Marc L. Venable
317 3rd Ave S 4-fL10 2
Edmonds, WA 98020
Robert W. & Barbara B. Noack
317 3rd Ave S. #103
Edmonds, WA 98020
Wayne S. & Nancy T. Smudk
317 3rd Ave S. #201
Edmonds, WA*98020
Cascade Savings & Loan
Neil Warren (6wner of #202)
2828 Colby
Everett,WA 98201
Helen Turner
317 3rd Ave S #203
Edmondsl WA 98020
John E. Rutter, Jr. (owner of #301)
1452 8th Place South
Edmonds, WA 9BO20
Russell C. & Olga B. Speer (owner of #302)
PO Box 681
Edmonds,WA 98020
Ann Wilson
Josephine Gibson
317 3rd Ave S #303
Edmonds, WA 98020
327 3rd Ave S.
Lila Brown
535 Jameson
Sedro Woolley, WA 98284
t-5
Lanita S. Wright, M.D. Elizabeth Bell Wayne & Nancy Smuck
242 4th Ave. S. #6 317 3rd Ave. S. #201
10919 Algonquin Rd. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds, WA 98020
Bennett Box
Estate of Olive L. Hawley
120 2nd Ave. S.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Carol Elwell
242 4th Ave. S. # I
Edmonds, WA 98020
Snohomish County P.U.D.
2320 California
Everett, WA 98201
Isaac & Anna Heffentrager
239 4th Ave. S.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Cascade Savings & Loan
Neil Warren
2828 Colby
Everett, WA 98201
Resident
317 3rd Ave. S. #202
Edmonds, WA 98020
Eugene & Altrude Stime
Mathilda Anna
Trager
Helen Turner
242 4th Ave. S. #2
247 4th Ave.
S.
317 3rd Ave.
S. #203
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds, WA
98020
Edmonds, WA
98020
Resident
Mrs. Helen I.
Bird
John E. Rutter, Jr.
242 4th Ave. S. #3
251 4th Ave.
S.
1452 8th Pl.
S.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds, WA
98020
Edmonds, WA
98020
Shoreline Savings
Ethyl Fenton
Resident
James R. Spence
261 4th Ave.
S.
317 3rd Ave.
S.
P.O. Box 25788
Edmonds, WA
98020
Edmonds, WA
98020
Seattle, WA 98125
Resident
242 4th Ave. S. #4
Edmonds, WA 98020
Shoreline Savings
Henry Thomson
P.O. Box 25788
Seattle, WA 98125
Resident
242 4th Ave. S. #5
Edmonds, WA 98020
Shoreline Savings
Michael Aleman
P.O. Box 25788
Seattle, WA 98125
Margaret Dority Estate
Robert Dority, Executor
5613 16th Ave. N.E.
Seattle, WA 98105
Majorie Palace
317 3rd Ave. S. #101
Edmonds, WA 98020
Marc L. Venable
317 3rd Ave. S. #102
Edmonds, WA 98020
Robert & Barbara Noack
317 3rd Ave. S. #103
Edmonds, WA 98020
Ck�-q-No
Russel & Olga Speer
P.O. Box 681
Edmonds, WA 98020
Resident
317 3rd Ave. S. #302*
Edmonds, WA 98020
Ann Wilson
Josephine Gibson
317 3rd Ave. S. #303
Edmonds, WA 98020
Lila Brown
535 Jameson
Sedro Woolley, WA 98284
Resident
227 3rd Ave. S.
Edmonds, WA 98020
INTER' -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Gary McComas Fire Marshal
Bobb Mills Public Works Feb. 20, 1986
TO- y DATE
Jerry H�uth, Dan Smi.h Engineering,
SUBJECT
CU-9-86 CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN RM ZONE AT
250-4TH AVE. S. (RM 1.5)
HEARING DATE: MARCH 6, 1986
PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS AS SOON'AS POSSIBLE. SORRY
FOR THE SHORT NOTICE.
THANKS.
Duane Bowman Planning
BY
LITHO IN USA
TOPS (4) FORM 1232 VERBAL ORDERS DON'T GO�
T i
.' � i.�� ��' 1." � �' "
INTER-OFF1
Gary McComas - Fire Marshal,--'
Feb. 20, 1986
TO Bobby Mills Public Works DATE
Jerry Hauth, D—An SM—i-tK --E—ngi—neering
SUBJECT
CU-9-86 CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFI.CE IN RM ZONE AT
250-4TH AVE. 5.,(.RM 1.5)
HEARING DATE: MARCH 6, 1986
PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS AS SOON''AS POSSIBLE. SORRY,
FOR THE SHORT NOTICE.
THANKS.
R E C E I V E D
FEB 20 1986
EDMONDS FIRE DEPT.
Duane Bowman Planning
BY
TOPS 0 FORM 1232 FVER13AL ORDERS DON'T G��) LITHO IN U.S.A.
c:I — '8- (-p
Q�,
4,
F-C F, EP
FEB
E CORRESPONDENCE
=1MTER-OFF!Ck
pu
zry McComas
Fire Marshal
Public Works Feb.
20, 1986
.0 obb ly Mills
DATE
T
er i. D. n S—mi-th---E-n—gi eering
j ry hautl
SUBJECT
---------
-
CU-9-86
CONDITIONAL USE FOR PR OFESSIONAL OFFICE IN RM ZONE AT
250-4TH AVE. S.,(,RM 1.5)
HEARING DATE: MARCH 6, 1986
PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS AS SOON 'AS POSSIBLE.
SORRY
FOR THE SHORT NOTICE.
THANKS.
Duane Bowman - Planning
BY
TOPS FORM 1232 VERBAL ORDERS DON'T Gpj LITHO IN U.S.A.
1:5
4) za
00 -1z la t9 Akj C
R -El :E D
EC
CITY QF- �DMONDS
Y,
THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING
THURSDAY, MARCH 6, 19 00 6 ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
FILE NO. CU-9-86
REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
(PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOLOGY)
PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION 250 4TH AVE. S.
ZONE DISTRICT- RM-1.5
THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT -- 7:30 P M., IN THE PLAZA MEETING ROOM, LIBRARY
BUILDING, 650 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL,
YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS
WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER.
IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR
FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY
AT THE MEETING.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 250 FIFTH AVENUE
NORTH, EDMONDS (PHONE 771-3202, EXTENSION 252).
THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR
CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE
WARNING! OF THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE
BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT.
THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER MARCH 6, 1986
P�--�-)tcot L ryka,�ecco
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 1�; �!' I
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
Susan Painter
depose§ and says:
21st February '1986
That on the daylof the attached
Notice of Public Hearing was ma�iled as required to adjacent property owners,
the names of which were provided by the applicant.
Subscribed and sworn to before
19Z6 -
Signed &.�4— pae-41'70
me this day of
N I otary Public in and for Ehe
State of Washington.
Residing at
0
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
FILE NO. CU-9-86
APPLICANT Lanita Wright
Duane Bowman being first duly sworn, on oath, deposes
and says:
That on the 21st day of February —2 19 86 , the attached
Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event,
in the Frances Anderson Center and Civic Center, and where applicable on or near
the subject property.
Signed (L41�t
Subscribed and sworn to before me this �, _2 day of
19 K6 .
10V
Notary Public in and for the S a t'
Washington.
Residing at
EXHIBIT LIST
CU-9-86
EXHIBIT 1 - STAFF REPORT
EXHIBIT 2 - APPLICATION/DECLARATIONS
EXHIBIT 3 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT 4 - PHOTOGRAPHS
EXHIBIT 5 - VICINITY MAP
I
I
EXHIBIT 1
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
FILE: CU-9-86
HEARING DATE: March 6, 1986
REQUESTED ACTION:
Conditional use permit to allow a professional office at 250
4th Ave. S., Edmonds.
APPLICANTLOWNER:
Applicant - Lanita Wright, M.D. Owner - Estate of Olive Hawley
10919 Algonquin Road Bennett Box
Edmonds, WA 98020 120 2nd Ave. S.
Edmonds, WA 98020
III. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
See Exhibit 3
IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
A. Description of the Subject Property and Surroundinq Area
The subject property is located on the west side of 4th
Ave. S., north of the Snohomish County P.U.D. substation.
Ther is an existing single family residence and detached
garage located on the property.
The Applicant intends to leave the existing residence
basically intact. The interior will be remodeled into
office spaces. The only exterior work will be to repaint
the building and connect the garage to the main building.
Parking spaces will be provided in the rear of the building.
Surrounding development is a mixture of single family and
mutilpe family development. As noted above, the P.M.
substation is located just to the south.
B. Official Street Map
East - 4th Ave. S.
ELqkosed R/W
601
ExistiEg R/W
601
West - Alley 19, 191
lei
Staff Report
CU-9-86
Page 2
C. Zoning Ordinance
The subject property is zoned RM-1.5, as are the adjacent
properties.
The requested condi-tional use permit does not appear to
conflict with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance or the
RM-1.5 zone.
D. Comprehensive Plan
The subject property is designated as Commercial/Business.
The proposed conditional use permit does not appear to
conflict with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan.
E. Not Detrimental
The proposed use should not be significantly detrimental to
the public nor to nearby private property or improvements.
A declaration of non -significance has been issued on this
project.
F. Transferability
The permit should be transferable.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appproval of CU-9-86, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements.
2. The permit should be transferable.
EXHIBIT 4
LL-
I r
-41
L
ILI
ef
C N.
c?
r
'EXHIBIT 5 202
S.E. 1/4, SEC. 23 T.27N., R.3 E.W.M.
508
PUGET SOUND 4Z6
V.-CINITY MAP
cu-9--86,
5 N==4 00 :%H�
00
:F-
N 0 R T H
Ovimmet
zjlx�� bv�cji ,_,e -
05
P.M
SCALf LV Ffb*T
4,
t2a e
4
D.
CTA -
A.
ED
UAT I UIV I,
Ito
It
10 Ito
0
40
I
�ao�
ec
ISO
flo
9
150
WILDLIFE
Rr6FV&d
:�s
'NUA L NUT
�10;
(4 4 I.T
- /101
19 MAII
OLD
mil.l.
t1i TOWO'
> 2.07.
qX1 - Fr2
ALDER
rl%c.�es
05
# 201, 317 Third Ave. * So -
Edmonds. Wash. 98020
March 5, 1986
r(c, rq.-
le F
Plmning D-!,PxctnO-%It cU-9-86
It
.O.ArInj; P.%tm-later
2r
1,0 rlftk &Vnnu,�, tkn-th
rAf,-ajtd-_,�. 98"1"20
:,),?mr Sir ;,3.r.fA(xd property owners residing
W�� t�ae. Und"Trz, "
go- in, back. of .250 Fourth Avenue 3outh, Edmonds, Washington, wish
,, or A ' & Professional office.
tj, -,,�bj:sct to thO US- chc,% mibove n=ed P-10110�-I*ty "Is
ar,O �he T
bp.,s*d on L ollowing.
4, the corners p.nd one previously established
W;tlq tile, C,
-nuc South
I r� U,-L,%ctj.OjA of Fourth Av�,
chimpract-11C, Off�-Pt, t,','- .Mit is allowr�d, we feel
-onditincrial. Use PO,
J�f the
I italt-lionfor OthOr ,>r
nv
U (.., street remaill
LzI Jfola-.�wr h ta lumvtl. th
txwald be, nond f()r off
al traffic pra!AoIa3
A
th tj i
-Iley fro-m
the
c,.-,,:rjta t;z qatnrir
X
narro;k, narx-mr and th!� Mad -s a
autiout; Am w3ing the 'allcy w
to th's
12
S17
1-7 - -3,<))
% r T.
;77 P - z-//-3 7
77� — ) t-) �4 Z
77J -3 VO J
0
TRtCr__*1VF.0
TO: HEARING EXAMINER MAR 0 11986
CITY OF EDMONDS
EDMONDS,WASH. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIR.
REF: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FILE NO.
CU-9-86
HEARING - MARCH 6th, 1986 7:30PM
The owners of property located at 317 - 3rd Ave South (THE Mayfield
Condos) which are located directly (west) across the alley from
subject property 250 - 4th Ave South - greatly oppose the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit.
We request a denial be placed into the record based on the following
items:
1. This request is for a re -model of an existing residential
structure, the building was not designed for professional
office use.
2. The alley is used only by residently
3. The alley is dead-end and not a through street
4. The alley is only single line, more traffice will
cause congestion
5. The alley entrance at walnut street is only 15 feet
5 inches from telephone pole to telephone pole
6. The alley is the only access by auto to the apartment
house/condos to the north of subject property
7. The subject property is located in the middle of
residently property (excluding the PUD sub station)
8. The CHIROPRACTOR Office at 272 - 4th Ave South
does not use the alley
9. The apartments/condos located to the south of subject
property have entry by auto from the street and the
alley this method should be required on all future
improvements
THANK YOU FOR HEARING OUR REQUEST
OBERT-W."NOACK
PRESIDENT
THE MAYFIELD CONDOS
P.S. While this hearing is being conducted I will be in
Ellensburg attending Computer School. If.your decision
is in favor of the Conditional Use Permit, please
the hearing to all.ow time for a petition
-'Ue—circulated.
F'"
0
M1
CAROL P. ELWELL
242 - 4TH AVENUE SOUTH, APT. 1
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
February 28, 1986
B.E C -E, Y E D
�QITY �DE EDMOND.8
Planning Department
250 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Dear sirs:
T -9-86,
.1egarding the hearing on March 6th, File CU
request for a conditional use permit for professional
office at 250 - 4th Avenue south in Edmonds, I wish
to say that I would be 100% in favor of this request.
I intend to be at the hearing, but should something
come up that I would be unable to attend the hearing,
I should like to go on record in favor of the request.
I live immediately next door to the property and look
out on it and I see no reason why this should not be
a desireable use of the property.
Sincerely,
Carol P. Elwell
tJ
j
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM
AND/OR WISH TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S FINDINGS OF FACT
CU-9-86 LANITA WRIGHT, M.D..
Conditional Use Permit for a professional offi'ce at
250 4th Ave. S.
NAME
NAIVCY -F 5MOCK-
Av)
ADDRESS
3/7 -T-I�IRD AVE,
0 j d-
Z-C) I / EJ
n, P- &A-LL �4,, 1 G D
10q
I a,) rr-1) L "
2, --,
7,1 Y a -,Al
E ty [-- -
FINDINGS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE
CITY OF EDMONDS
CITY OF EDMONDI,,j
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FILE: CU-9-86
OF LANITA WRIGHT, M.D. FOR APPROVAL
OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DECISION: The conditional use permit is granted
subject to the conditions listed.
INTRODUCTION
Lanita Wright, M.D., 10919 Algonquin Road, Edmonds, Washington,
98020, and hereinafter referred to as Applicant: has reauested
a conditional use permit for the allowance of a professional
office at 250 4th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington. The subject
property is more particularly described as:
Beginning 351.42 feet West and 125 feet
South of the Northeast corner of the Southeast
quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range
3 E., W.M.; thence South 75 feet; thence West
130 feet; thence North 75 feet; thence East 130
feet to the point of beginning; ALSO KNOWN AS
Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 2, Olympic View Addition,
according to the unrecorded plat thereof, situate
in Snohomish County, WA.
The subject property is owned by the Estate of olive Hawley.
Bennett Box, 120 - 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington, 98020,-
is the attorney for the estate.
A hearing on the request was held before the Hearing Examiner
of the City of Edmonds on March 6, 1986.
At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence:
Duane Bowman
Planning Dept.
City of Edmonds
Edmonds, WA 98020
Nancy T. Smuck
201 - 317 3rd Ave. So.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Ben Box
120 - 2nd South
Edmonds, WA 98020
Lanita Wright
10919 Algonquin Road
Edmonds, WA 98020
Carol Elwell
242 - 4th Ave. So., #1
Edmonds, WA 98020
Mr. Noack
At the hearing the following exhibits were submitted and admitted
as part of the official record of these proceedings:
11"
Findings and Decision of the
Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds
Re: CU-9-86
Page 2
Exhibit 1 - Staff Report
it 2 - Application/Declarations
it 3 - Legal Description
It 4 - Photographs
It 5 - Vicinity Map
6 - Noack Letter
7 - Elwood Letter
8 - Smuck Letter
After due consideration of the evidence presented by the Applicant;
evidence elicited during the public hearing; and, as a result of
the personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding
areas by the Hearing Examiner, the following Findings of Fact and
Conclusions constitute the basis of the decision of the Hearing
Examiner.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The application is a request for a conditional use permit for
the allowance of a professional office to be located at 250 -
4th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, and more parti-
cularly described as set forth above. (Staff report.)
2. The subject property is owned by the estate of olive Hawley.
It is the intent of the Applicant to buy the property and to
convert the house on the property into a professional office
for psychiatrists and psychologists. (Wright testimony.)
3. The property is located on the west side of 4th Avenue South
and north of the Snohomish County P.U.D. substation. As noted,
there is an existing single-family residence on site with an
attached garage. (Wright testimony.)
4. The subject property is zoned RM-1.5 as set forth in the
Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). section 16-30.
020(C) of the ECDC classifies offices in RM-1.5 zones as a
primary use requiring a conditional use permit. (Staff
report and ECDC.)
5. In order for a conditional use permit to be granted within the
City of Edmonds the criteria as set forth in Section 20-05-010
of the ECDC must be satisfied. These criteria include:
A. The proposed use must be consistent with the Comprehen-
sive Plan of the City of Edmonds;
B. The proposed use in its location must be consistent with
the purposes of the zoning ordinance in which the pro-
perty is located; and,
C. The proposed use must not be significantly detrimental
to the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious
to nearby private properties or improvements.
M
0 J
Findings and Decisl�_ n of the
Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds
Re:
CU-9-86
Page 3
6.
The subject property is designated in the Comprehensive Plan
as Commercial/Business. The proposed conditional use permit
does not appear to conflict with the purposes of this designa-
tion. (Staff report.)
7.
There are other offices in the area and in the.neighborhood.
There is a chiropractor's office located near the subject
property. The use will not adversely impact these other uses,
nor will it be detrimental to the public nor to nearby private
properties or improvements. (Staff report.)
8.
It is the intent of the Applicant to use the subject property
as an office for psychiatrists and psychologists. The pro-
fessionals working at the office will care for 8 to 12 patients
per day. There will be no other employees on site. (Wright
testimony.)
9.
Adequate parking for the patients of the Applicant is avail-
able on 4th Avenue South. In addition, there are parking
places in the rear of the subject property off the alley.
(Bowman testimony.)
10.
The Applicant's request meets all the parking requirements
for office space that is in the RM-1.5 zone. (Bowman testi-
mony.)
11.
No exterior work will be done to the structure on site except
for painting and residing a part of the building. The garage
on site will remain attached to the building. (Wright testi-
mony.)
12.
It is the intent of the Applicant to convert the single-family
residence into office use. There may be some need for interior
remodelling of the structure. (Wright testimony.)
13.
The Planning Department of the City of Edmonds rec ommended
approval of the conditional use permit subject to the fol-
lowing conditions:
1. Comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements.
2. The permit should be transferable.
14.
Witnesses from a neighboring condominium building voiced con-
cern about the use of the subject property for office purposes.
The major concern of the witnesses was the use of the alley
The wit-
behind the subject property for parking purposes.
nesses want to ensure that this alley is cleared of any parked
vehicles. (Smuck and Noack testimony.)
15.
Those witnesses voicing concern about the use of the subject
property for office space stated that the neighborhood is a
residentially zoned area and the allowance of the office
: I
Findings and Deci�,n of the
Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds
Re: CU-9-86
Page 4
could be an "open door for commercial use." (Smuck testimony.)
16. An owner of property immediately north of the subject property
testified to be in support of this request. The witness testi-
fied that the use of the subject property for office space as
proposed by the Applicant is more desirable than the develop-
ment of the property with additional apartments. (Elwell
testimony.)
CONCLUSIONS
1. The application is for the approval of a conditional use permit
for the allowance of a professional office to be situated in the
structure located at 250 - 4th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington,
and more particularly described as set forth above.
2. In order for a conditional use permit to be granted within the
City of Edmonds the criteria as set forth in Section 20.05.010
of the ECDC must be satisfied. The application satisfies these
criteria.
3. The proposed use as a commercial office is consistent with the
Commercial/Business designation of the subject property as set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan. it is consistent with this
plan in that it satisfies the goals and policies of Section
15.20.010 of the ECDC.
4. The proposed conditional use permit is consistent and does not
conflict with the goals and policies of the zoning ordinances
of the City of Edmonds and in particular withthe RM-1.5 zoned
areas of the City.
5. The requested conditional use permit will not be detrimental
to the nearby private properties or improvements.
6. A declaration of nonsignificance has been issued for the project.
7. The permit should be transferable.
8. The Planning Department of the City of Edmonds has recommended
approval of the conditional use permit subject to the condi-
tions set forth in Finding #13.
DECISION
Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions; the
testimony and evidence submitted at the public hearing; and, upon
the impressions of the Hearing Examiner at a site view, it is here-
by ordered that the requested conditional use permit be granted.
The specific request is for the allowance of an office in an
existing building located at 250 - 4th Avenue South, Edmonds,
Washington, and is granted subject to the following conditions:
1. The Applicant is to comply with all Architectural Design
Findings and Decis," n of the
Hearing Examiner 0'., the City of Edmonds
Re: CU-9-86
Page 5
Board requirements.
2. The Applicant is to secure all necessary permits for interior
or exterior construction on site.
3. The Applicant is to instruct all patients not to park in the
alley immediately behind the structure on the subject property.
4. The conditional use permit shall be transferable.
Entered this 21st day of March, 1986, pursuant to the authority
granted the Hearing Examiner under Chapter 20.100 of the Community
Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
0
/NOTJS M. DRISCOLL
He ring Examiner
�' a
I, OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Written appeals Lidging specific error of fact or other grounds
for appeal may be filed with the Planning Department, City of
Edmonds, Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, within fourteen
(14) days of the date of the Hearing Examiner -Is final action. In
this matter any appeal must be received by the Department prior
to 5:00 p.m. on April 5, 1986.