The URL can be used to link to this page

336 ADMIRAL WAY STE AJV SNOHONIISH CO FIRE D k1- d' I IST&F low' A*'D?"n''*Y1zAt I '6j"O. jlrk� oervink Brier, Edmmds, and 12425 Meridian Ave S Mowitlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 . Phoize (425) 551-1200 www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 LOCATION: 336 Admiral Way Suite A 98020 BUSINESS NAME: Port of Edmonds - Shop MAILING 336 Admiral Way, Suite A, Edmonds, WA 98020 ADDRESS: BUSINESS OWNER: (�n ,- EMERGENCY-1: POE Security KEY ACCESS-2: EMAIL: NAJ PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR: Q�—P'A.Q-lk I %— (z Date Last Serviced: ko 14 4257748878 PHONE: FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT )4EDMONDS L1 BRIER 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 0 UNINCORPORATED Fj6?FNCY STATFV SHIFT'*' SCHEDULED Aug 2017 DATE DUE � I TUT-- UFIR k HOME PHONE: P7.'s -N 6"541a, 4255087490 e - HOME PHONE: 17 CURRENT YES NO HOME PHONE: CITY BUSINESS LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE 1A. ..'FIRE'PREVENTION Serving Brier, Edmon8s, and 12425 Meridian Ave S 114SPECTION REPORT SNOHO Isfi Co. Mountlake Terr . ace NEDMONDS Everett, WA 98208 0 BRIER FIRE Pbone (425) 551-1200 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE [I UININ,�ORPORATED DISTR T www'.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 336 Admiral Way 98020 e' FREQUENCY 2017 I STATION & SHIFT 17-B LOCATION: BUSINESS NAME: Port Of Edmonds.Office PHONE: 4257740549 SCHEDULED Aug 2017 DATE DUE � 591 MAILING 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 ADDRESS: LIFIR v-\()p4fr\- C) BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: Port Of Edmonds EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE' 17 rCURRENT YES NO KEY ACCESS-2: 0-1 Lr HOME PHONE: CITY BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: :11RESYSTEMS: FA03/15FE10/13 AAA FIRE & SAFETY, INC 3013 3RD AVE NORTH (W IU13 SEATTLE,. WA 98109 EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT 'THE NONTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" FIREALARM SYSTEM Status,GiVen (bne System per Report). RED W WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST I JX[ REPAIR Sorinkler Monitoring' Panel? Occupanc Address - - 336 ADMIRAL WA-Y Occupancy Name, PORTOF EbMONDS Res ponsible. Person First & Last Name': BRIAN Menard Phone NUmber'-. Responsible Person Address, City, State, Zip, Responsible,p.arty bmenard gportoifedmonds.org E-M.ail Address Date of Inspection; 04/115/20 16 0*9:00a-m. PDT Inspecti.on Annual x FreqUency/Typ e-,- Quarterly' Testers Name Mark, Hagen, Bryce Cropper (Please Printy. Ni6et- Number'. -7 H00040 Identification Number: S ystem. Loca . t ion EleVator room -Central station monit9ring? Yes [3 No El Monitoring Moniton' ng,Required?" y6s 11 Nor], Company Name: System Make: 120 vac Sb with.elev. recall. Syst0th Model: FIRE C013i VIOLATIONs FOUND: 6f additional room is needed,,. please add a. separate shee t) CORRE&ONS MAbE*' Date. GoreOcted. Corrected Bq-' (ifadditibnalroom-isne6d�d,lpl6eks-ea0d.a.§eoar6tiB!shei6t)* Ni6of Certification Nurnber.�. Thisucertifids that-thi,s,fire and lif4i.,safety system hastedn Oropeyly irfspected for reliability to. cover the moort and j s-iste- Items. listed in this rL s con nt*ithfire� DepArtriient*, Fire.Code sta�hdards, a0d 'that' d discrep9ncies'are noted an v b -the building,'0wher/Manager forcorrectiV6,adtion... e te gign.ature. of, T . s DMI Phone (206).2t44721. Building Representative�- (sionature), IV, Fire�Alarrn Systems Page 102- The items on �he checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life salety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. Alarm Svstem Functionalit 1. Trouble signal with AC power off? Yes No E] 2. System operates properly on battery backup? Yes No 3. Battery voltage (no load) volts 4. Battery voltage (full load) volts (signals operat4q/C oni 5. Charge circuit voltage Xvolts 6. System operates properly on standby power? Yes Noo 7. All signals operate on AC power? Yes No [-] 8. Number of initiating circuits 9. Number of signal circuits 10. Does alarm system meet audibility standards as accepted? Yes Noo 11. All circuits checked for electrical supervision? Yes nX No 12. All auxiliary equipment operates (Elevators, fans, dampers)? N/A Yes No 13. Ventilation controls operate? N/A Yes Non 14. Key to panel available? N/A Yes NoE] 15. Materials and equipment needed to restore pull stations are available at the N/A FXI Yes E] No[:] main panel, e.g. glass rods, and plates; keys and allen wrenches, etc? 16. Operating instructions at panel? Yes No 17. Trouble indicators function properly? Yes No 18. Remote Annunciator Panels function properly? N/A FXJ Yes Non 19. Elevator Call Down functions properly? N/A Yes NoE] 20. Test record posted at panel? Yes No 21. General alarm automatic time delay _ (minutes) N/A 22. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A FXJ Yes No 23. Other Devices (Specify) Yes No System Devices Total Number of Units in Building Total Number Units Tested Test Results Acceptable 24. Bells, Horns, Chimes 1 N/A Yes No El 25. Voice Speakers (Voice Clarity) N/A Yes No 26. Visual Alarm Devices N/A 0 YesE] No 27. Smoke Detectors 1 N/A Yes No 28. Heat Detectors 1 N/A Yes No 29. DuclL Detectors N/A FX_1 YesEl No [:1 30. Sprinkler Flow Switches N/A FX_1 Yes No [:] 31. Sprinkler Supervisory Switches N/A R Yes No El 32. Manual Pull Stations N/A N Yes No 33. Annunciator(s) N/A FX] Yes No 34. Beam Detectors N/A X Yes No 35. Automatic Door Unlocks N/A FX-1 Yes NoEj 36. Automatic Door Release N/A FX-1 Yes No El 37. Fire Dampers N/A 0 YesE] Noo Communication Equipment Total Number of Units in Building Total Number Units Tested Test Results Acceptable 38. Phone Sets N/A [:1 Yes F No El 39. Phone lacks N/A Yes F NoF 40. Call -in Signal N/A Yes [] No [j Fire Alarm Systems Page 2 of 2 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company KIN& 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 NFPA 25 Testing 2066224656 SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST DRY 11 WET 11 DRY STAN 'Name: Port of Umondt",- b 6 n s Oc u** a cupancy.Addre'ss: 336 Admiral W8y,Edmo C P, ncy 4, ' �§pp 2R �0�,:,Fer 42��,'-7��7,4i'05491 L a rh C O§tdhT P ow urn e r. igst'N e h ,Ffik, hri 61 0 336 .Admiral Way; � j�'k Res W) Po mo 1§, 19 t y, ta t e;' Z ip s 'd spqnsJ1. e�: . erson.4 P d E mafl�� Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG 'Ma es xi ehc T y Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. System Location: DEFICIENCIEs FoUND? Yes C3 No List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet REP* 9, 6rie`cibd`l3-y. Dat This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) __�rl &n . OJ\e V.1�1 Date q/_7 //-�_ Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 SPRINKLER HEADS 1 . Th-e-Standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" have thbrh�s Sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed intervals thereafter. - Due date for sample testin�_� -2 - jhd Quick Response sprinkler heads are —,�an 20,years old.orwithin a d. prescri6edjestiridperici lf."No"�have the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 and at NIA 0 the prescribed intervals thereafter. u ' D date for sample testing: e .3w nThd dry type sprinkler are less than 10 years old or iMthin, a. -prescribe period. W aVe the heads -sample tested or replaced per,26.08 NFPA 25 and- at 'N/A.' 173 the prescribed intervals thereafter. -,.'Due'dgte.f6rtami)16.testinq: 'u ce on a ges s u� rri6iht'e'rian* es slup-to-da"fe" ug lo i -f h :'I'o�,`Du e date. r. ene�t��cdmmpa son tes a califfrateti-96"e-eyAn ',Note:. The.system. gauges are to be compair6dvitli` five,( e ars.-. IT-a-gaug n 3% 6f:th vau e, ,ye reca aited. Thischd6k sho uldlla�d�� " ", libr* Z��rsif6 `s-iai4i�pressure-- s h e,is not.withi e,�dalibraitodl, SHW _u I _q. Ah n I OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION No C3 brifiectiob-(17PP), piping is U ihi.52yb roustrudffN� gation of.'Fire' �Db* partmenCG stil dai inaccordance with 20108 N am 14; (e* 1100 bst `U i6 1 v stic on- �h R.16atbj 6r� ext FD o r ct n n e .1all 6 d'kigt Q d o n of. t h e c obstruction e e FDC(s ing heck. Nvi .:es lve. 3. Ttie-5--yeaMbstruction Examination of the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accordance �Yes C�3�� with 2008 NFPA 25 Chap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Date for next Pipinq Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE t6h '6�wa�'.hydr6stati6ll�t6sted-atfiot�le'ss.th'�in-.-20'0�osio"r.�50,':"*'i -PIP'. .acce s , s . of, ss , ure,where maximury) pressur6,is,inexcesi' N/A,. - C]. P.S ,:f;`"(_Thb- I' d 'pe FireDep6rtmentConne'ci' n(�)(FPC):is1'd&6r'6f b6shes', s an' t o pil N/A Y s NO-' ��'94qrds. &6ther�debris and is visible frorfi,the'street'.-'�"'_ 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 0 Yes No C3 Z —1f a ''k g* from a,*FD-*d t*,h-e,*,.- .p ug,.or cover wclsmissin pipinig.Was.in.speq e Yes.. No - 1��deb'4.,'bhi�*is�-r' A— N/A 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A C3 Yes A No CO3 6.-..' All swi v*61sjurnfreel y* NjA C3 Y,e,s,,' , o NQ 0 I . - . . : J FINAL CHECKS Was -rem" 6ved. from,test-mode ai ecau (onary_� he Fire' idior other pr ti'' .a u,"', e, moved io,reistorefir6411ai 6 s res.-were r rn system.to- normal N/A ..,o era ion includes rieriibv'al oUp rote.9tive coverings 6 2. The system was left in service. YeSA No C3 If "No", why �3.-:: The confidd'nce* test report -was given to the owner and a,current statusjaig, was. posted. Yes A:'�.The,confidencejest repbrtwas. sent to'the fire marshal s�offjce. S 173, Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South KIN& Seattle, WA 98134 NFPA 25 Testing 1 2066224656 SPRINKLER SYSTEm 5 YEAR TEST DRY C3 WET C3 DRY STAN 7 7 7. FF,- Occdpancy.Add ,-�36 Admiral Way, Edmonds, Ocdupancy,,N6ffi&. .'Port of�Edmonds R68p,'Ohsible' Person,,. 0549� Chris Qstd �Phone, N6nt- a ,e si' rman,�,* 0e60ohsibl6':R'erso; —336- dmital'Way AddVOSS ,;I Is- sterrnan@,portofedmonds.o biiAadres�W, 60 dmondsWX*98020 Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG r Td§PF�6` Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No.. - System Location: Rb c DEFICIENCIES FOUND? Yes 13 No List items that were not corrected at Mthe time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet Aw low, U S �-IREP RA een-correde'd"O' ,XI !pUeficiencii6,6� b x- This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NPPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician Phone#: (206)622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) _ C-4v-%, cr-N Mcy-) (,v-( I Date �1 / I / I -J5-- Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 INKLER HEADS 1. The st5?tdafd_wrinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" have the h631� uIetested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed Yes No 13 intervals thereafter. Due date for sample testinq: 2. The Quick Response slirifikl'e'r�fieads are less than 20,y Id or within a prescribed testing period If "No" have the heads sample tested or Ireplaced per 200 Ar25 a7n, NIA 171. Yes C3 ;'No 'Ci the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for sample testing: 3. The dry type sprinkler head s than 10 yea�s old or within a le test sa ed c mp p c rescribed testi 0 C3 If "No." e heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at N/A C3 Yes Cl No 113 D scr t ry s t ft r. t e prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for sbmDI6*tbstinq: 'hanGe_Qn: the system.gauges, is up -to ate. ,The'mainle -d Due. date.for the next,�-� .Iesii C 'th a calibrate gauge evei Note: The -system gau d ryjw p9;.ed_wj ace F, yei" 173 i...No C3 'if a it i of th4--calibir ;99�rzuel*j Zefflqftr� gauge is.no �6, ate recalibirated. This ched s 11' 'e A io e floors at static, pressui e us n- one calibrated,gau Alic calculations. OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION 1 T h et��-_y_i i . v s I �Pi ati6h of Fire Department Connection (FDC) pip'in t, Q IS UP-' 0- clate.ihlaccordla I halp.,14. (effA0/21/2(!jgj_._, 'figation .:Date. e nex0F io, I 'alLo�, .'2. f67_4fi`p-,MQ�)1hcIuded 46sting7a_7M-oper '.,:No., vave'.1. N 3. The 5-yeuLbsru-ction Examination of the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accordance �Yes ��o 0 _auWrM8 NFPA 25 Chap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Date for next PiDina Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE ,.1,; Standpipe,was,,hyqr&t4t iteked at riot less than 200 i-of 50 psi Rs �,Mhbfemaximym 16d N/A No.C3 a6cess:ofm axi pressure is in e�cess,of '2'-The standpipb Fiee-D60bttmerMQ 66hection(s) is clear of bushe�, 'r,other Yos�M No 0 guards I debri� isyisibl6from the street 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A C3 Yes No C] :4. 4�1.hiis�66W6`rn a FDC the pipin' was inspec e "if a plug or cover w� 9. t N/A,,,- Yes*: 0'� Jor..4 tki. cl)"�� e c A. �jq 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 13 Yes No C3 6.. All.swiveislurn freely. N/A 0 Y s : e NoTl FINAL CHECKS "I. Thb�.Firi_,Alarm i�'i�frernovedfrdii!46;st mode and/or otherpredautiona . d to'riiai0i4alarm:sys t N measures were r em'ove E, em o norma operation (includes,removalW Orotectiv6 coverings).. 2. The system was left in service. Yesr-d No 13 If "No", why ..The confidence test rep6i�t was -given to*the -owner and a. current'status. tag was, Dosted..�-.'�, Yes No C3 4.. - The confidence test. report was sent, to the fire' marshal's office. Ye S. No C3 Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 ; k Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Testing SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST DRY r] WET 0 DRY STAN 71 �-Odcuppqpy Address: 336 Admiral.Way,, Edmonds* Occupancy Name: Port of Edmond�,�"`_,,. -6hsible'Persor! �k -Phone Number* h s:,Ostbrriigh� 42&-,,� J:Fi`�'st'& Last �Name: C 6 �:Re`spo'nsibl& Person 336,Adrhiral \Ai a Resp SS e, 'Addre r6 ;�5!�.:Stat -zip gilsible P rty' .06st? ss A" -Edtp,§ E, M a i I Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG r I LiQ�" a�kjt 0 Test Freq Lie ncy: Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. System Location: (,q)r D_ 060k, DEFICIENCIEs FOUND? Yes[] No List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet " MI& cie' PAKS�?` s�nave-,Ijeen_ :6 - "All: eC it rrect66l3v::,.. Date: - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. A Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 -7, Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature). MUIC-Y-t Date Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 ; i SPRINKLER HEADS 1 . The'sisadard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "N6" have-ft-iieadis- sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed intervals thereafter. Yoe-ff No 10 Due date for sample estin 2. 7he Quick Response sprinkler heads are less tha ears o�,Id,or.wit ..prescribed testing period. or 'per NFPA 2 at N/A 0 Yes.0 If "No" have the heads sample tested or replaced,pe No C3. the prescribed intervals thereafter. for sample testing: -Th' ead -Within a e:dry.type sprinklqer�h es th6n''1,0. years. old �or t prescribed testin if v� ss Ste 'No hav eads sample tested.or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at N/A C3 Yes C3 No.0.1, '1he pWS-cribed intervals thereafter. f amDle te'stina: �..-.:DU6 date or,s I GAUGES Th-e-m-aintenance on the system gauges is up-to�-daite... Du 6 date f6r the n&-rmmpadsajLtest.- d g te 146tei' The.system gauges are C�11)111`11'11 FaTed-withzu:abiated gauge ever to b --`;-Years-;*.: If, a -gauge is not within4t; .39/6;�&-t ie ±czil�I�be�ated 0a h Yes - 0;0(,.",� -,J 00 ta .s. 00'ej check should be dofi6.4 rs at-siati�'Pressqre uaL6g, brie-calibirated -gauge and INVESTIGATION arZob-stm6tion-investigzation cff.irIe Departmjent'Connection (FD'C) piping is up7to'. h .1 th - 5'C 'haip With 20 .14,.',( 21/2012). Yes: -investigation r next: FDC obstruction 0 =nj�;ve:sti%iL :`r :h6. 6 -"krobstruction exam f --2 �"_T -Y'ec 6 �Pp FQ.q included- stin eiration of theS haek--_ V�l ve 3. The 5-year Obstruction Examination of the sri ng is up-to-date in accordan6��_�-e.5 with 2008 NFPA 25 C . e . 1/2012) No 0 Date foLx*xH;1iaa EbstructEio�n�Examination DRY STANDPIPE St6hdpipe was hydrosta ically t sted dt'66t I 6ssthfaifi -200'�pi�§i 6r-50. psi im t e -e�cess o 150 access of. m aximum pressure where, maximum f pressureAsin N/A, -Nob; stanclpi�e' Fire'Depairtment Connectj6h(�) (FOC)'Js clearof bushek N/A Yes�t X L. .,,,§qbMs.'.or:other debris and. is visible. fir m, th str .0, 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 0 Yes No C3 14.. 7 if a -missing from a.rbtffi led ..plug or, cover was e-piping Was inspec. N/A Y 0 PS ';,N 0 require d 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A C3 Yes No 0 '16' All swivei Is turn.freely:'. N 173 e y s No'd. FINAL CHECKS The Fire A arm. was removed froni test� hiode,and)or. other;'Ore'Gautio' 6a'ry- v4 m to,.norma! _4 �measures were r emov6 .-to"restor(*�-fitd.;aiarM.syste NIA t f6tectiV6 coverings�., .opera ion (ihdude's ir`eim` oval of 2. The system was left in service. "No", Yes No 13 If why The confidence �testireport was given to the owner,and a current status tag was po§ted. Yes.�o No 0: �-4.,',. Theconfidenc e test-rep6rt was,sent to,,the fife -marshal's*. office Ye S. No O.'.� Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 1 N CV 11� Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Testing SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST DRY 0 WET 0 DRY STANDPI t0ccU0afiqy.-Addres&: :336 Admiral Way,.Edmonds Oc'cupclpcy Name: Port of Edmonds -:.RespohsiljleTer';§oh'*, 11a t- N' ffiow%'. th' r* sq a is: Oster -man, P ne, Wrnbb'rt.*?'�`�,-�. .425774 0549 Admiral W spo'nsible eers'on-�- ay d �Gik :�G&I=Ssi 1�Edmo I hd s WA, 08020 R porisible Paity,�,.: �'EWai A Costerman@oortofedmonds.org ja 0 p Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG W e '61 enci D� 6 biN �e f IT! �T ? st.' - , fikt: Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. 1, F System Location: 5 �r DEFICIENCIES FOUND? Yes 11 No A List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Dericiencies section or attach itemized sheet R FP I K 4 -igh�i�s`,h�ve be6n,correct6d;;0',`.: E P ifie .1 Pj;I, This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technicia Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) n Me n6r-( Date 44 / -1) / -.5— Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report 0 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Pa"ge 1 of 3 SPRINKLER HEADS 1 . The standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" haVe-t4e_heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed Yes C3 No 11 intervals thereafter - Due date for sample testing: 2. The Quick. Resp6ns.e,sprinkler heads ss than 20 years old i in a Prescribed testih g,period. C3 Yes C3 if "No" have.the heads sample tes.ted or >replaced B-NERI!� 5 and �aN/A No 13 the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for samr)le testina: The dry type sprinkler he Ads-9-re less than 10 years old or within a prescribed tes'�i�iod. If "No" nd at N/A C3 Yes .,bave"Me heads,sample, tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 a the piescrib,6d intervals thereafter. Due d4te for..'saimple t6s,tidg:. No 13 GAUGES o A e sy -to-date. n hi, Stem_gaudb�isuo r Due date 156, the, next,comp No*te'-.'Thb:syitern gauge's are'to be compare d..g'p e eve ive.(5):. years. If ai- gauge Is not rated gaug it'M '66d, 'or Yes 13 No 11 o o the calib 'Ufe so re- -chvER t recalibrated. TbW should -be done' for multiple floors at, st I re on nau e4qd'hVd`rauIIc calculatio _q ns. e,g,j�rafed, I OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION t iping;q up:� o7 The, em-pbskurtioh investigationof Fire Department Connectioh;(E.Qq) �0' �Wll date id a6cord6h ffi-20,0&�NFPA 25 Chap. 14. (eff. 10/21/201'2)'�.'� y S_o--�No Co y 6fo, 'kt,F Dat r ne D. obstruct o, mist the chec 2,.; Th6 ��yeairbbstrdction exarbl6r.4he FDC s) include k 010: iflg� -'Yes 0. N 3. The 5-year Obstruction Examina' rinkler piping is up-to-date in accora—am 4 P C e_�-es_ 13 No 0 with 2008 NFPA �25Ch (eff. 110�/21/2012) 1� . I Q 0 struct i ti Date for n in b Ion Exam na on .q Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE 'tested Si5nd h 0 50 psi in.-:,-�z p e wa& Ydrost56&#1,1k at n 't less than 2M'psror 6i 1 -'�"N A N 0 . access of maki u m`pr'�,�', 'IsAn e . x , c , ess Yes)q 0 essure where maximum pressure 2. -The standpipe Fire DepeirtMentCon6ection(s) (FDC) is clear of:.busho� '171 No 0 es deb is and"is'.,visible'from the street 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A .0 Yes No 0 -�4.' -If a,plug qr-cover was, missing rom a FDG the piping was inspected -:_1 .1 . � I ., -Y :4. N/A )..es, 0 No 0 d 'is'reauired) f6r.' ebri§.* Tthis 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 0 Yes No 0 N/A Ye No 13: .�6: All swivels turn freely.' S FINAL CHECKS 1 the was removed from te �t a othpirprecauticipary-, 'Fire Ala�m s mode nd/or measures,, W.ere, removedj*re�*rb fire alarm system to no.rMal.,-��N A, Yes 0: No 0 v operation. (includes removal of protective-cp erings). 2. The system was left in service. Yes No 11 If "No", why 1' The'conficlenc'e:test report. was'given to the �owner and a current status,t6d was posted. No 0 4- The confidence,test report was, sent to thefire marshal's. office* Y es'. No C3 . - Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 343.4 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 NFPA 25 Testing 2066224656 SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST- DRY 11 WET 13 DRY STANDPIPE Address: '7 Adrhi�6 monds Occu ancy Name:, 336 I',;W6y', Ed P Port'o arrignia ,,,-..,qqupancy, M* Responsible Person'. WN 41ast-Name:, 'h'h M I h q*b e: N Um" b er: 425 'Res bl' 'P '�-336---Ad IQ- pqnsi q erson ' IW , A(, imira I V:Y �� p�4 ep �W '�4, � �Z. 14 ress City, State,. Zi IR- .. M_"W �_ �. ": , - ..'' MQ 1M Wd **b,�.�,,,I,,�.,��,,.,�:!:.,,�, "'bh-ds WA 2 E-Ma Addr6ssr c Org."� Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG b9t :'o'f4est: ency. Test, Fr6qui ZYT Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. ep System Location: DEFICIENCIEs FoUND? Yes[] NoA List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet r 4�4htPAIRS` efl6libncles ,have;bqtq1j �Correqx6dl '41 'All d . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ......... . te* E�. d V: Y Date: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Iq Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company�. Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seaftle Washington Building Representative (signature) Y-; c rl V& f I & r- C I Date 411-7/IS-- Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report 13 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 I SPRINKLER HEADS — I 1. The stanBlg�inkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "W" have the he3ftsaQ2& tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for samr)le testina: f::i,2 -of- �_2. The Quick Response sprinkler- heads are less-tha ,Oyears-old within a prescribed testing period. 0'�:F d N/A i f "No" have the heads sample testedd ogr �reopl�per 20 18 N �P-,-264Q�A�Nh� t the prescribed intervals thereafter.: DU6 date for sami)le'testinc'i' The dry type sprink�l�er.hare less .'than O,ye6rs old or within a t 0 prescribed testin iod. v s .:If. "No hav h d le ir N/A eads sample testedc repiked, per 2008 NFPA 25 and, at t the scrib int rvals therea he,pr .,prescribed intervals th * er.eafter.. -,',..,Due, date for sam pie festi nq: 13 No 0 QA_UGES "Th& ntena�nn4heLayste i�upito-date.` m m-gauges I D ue a d' te fo� the nextcoin:p)6a—riisto-ht�est.;,:-'�-. - Note- The system gauges,ar-etb; ecom al p. r6d'Wn, ge every fl%�e (5). ars. if a gauge is not*.w1t6ih'4Aw3%",of.t ed,gauge it mu ed -or. Ell rig, -�ghoul r multitile floors at stati ressure�us recalibrated. This check P 6ne.6alibrated'qa�� -lid, I' yd'rau calcu ation��.. OBSTR-UCTlQq_ INVESTIGATION ucti -,fig nnection (FDC) piping is up-'to- .t,.`,'The'5-year obstr on irivt atQn f Fi biD60artmeht Co yy6r rM� 14� eff.:10121/2012) X�-,.-,�',�7�date in accordancewith'2004AFM -obstructio nves iqa ion .;:Uate:for next FDC nA t, 24:,jhe 5-y6ar obstruction 6kc�rii:,for,.thei�FD.C.(�)-.inctt9iod6d�:t6�tin �'�a psi. r, 0 y .A 13'* 3. The 5-year 0�b�s��Mination of the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accordanc, No C3 __�qh� 1�'�s E� wi 08-NFPA 25 Chap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Date for next PiDina Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE i or 50 in "5ta6dp ipe was hydros;tatid`6lly,,t66t 6at'not less, psi b ss.of maximum �re Ore wher&maximum,p es ure,is -in excess of 5 01 ac e r - 0', psi, J; A LC66nb6ti6fi(s),,( PC 0 es The standpipe Fire De0artmen F f bush N/A a: No or other debris and_ is vis-i6i'64r'onithe"We t 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 0 Yes X No 0 �47 7IN: lu o' cover was' r61s"C",ing f D. -,,the piping.was inspected, _ip 9 r rorn N X =77:�-,777.. -(t is is rqq fQ06bris: hi qLr 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 0 Yes No 0 ,6.-,,,, All, swivels turn freely. N/A,.,; _.7X7:77 es N60 FINAL CHECKS 1. Al ovdd 6 i�!:,tisli mode and/or other precautionary'' Th.eFire armwas:rem �01 C." measures were removed or' o , re fiiial�rm.�ystem to hormal, /A. - ti,.� est N Y s 4. '.N o ation (includes removal of,'06qte6tiVi�bovenngs: per; 2. The system was left in service. Yes No C3 If "No", why e d6rifid6riceJest rep6rt4as aiven t& the oWner-aind-a current*status tag was oosted." Yes -No:Cl 4'.. ThO:cOnfiden'ce t6stieport was--sieht.to, the fire,'matshal's: office. e -Y s A O� Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 .i Kcgr Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Testing SPRINKLER SYSTEm 5 YEAR TEST DRY 13 WET 0 DRY STAN 1,06cdo6fidy,'Addresg: 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds. .0.!cduDancV.Name:,.Pqrt of Edmonds Resodh eTerson— qZ �Chris Osterman Rh6he,.Num be'r� 425 774-0549 33 &Adaiiral Way, A 1, esp bi 'Edmonds WA 98020 PI)SI - tty� P' tE�-Majl:Ad&d�s .::.,Costerman@portofedmonds.org, Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG r 5 Year' s. jT T ON i 't N Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. - 1A System Location: Doc)k., DEFICIENCIES FoUND? Yes 13 No List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet cile t 4� e b en correc e 04 cl a, This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFrA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature)_ ZrIc a rilcn e, K —Date hs— Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report 13 1 Sprinklers NFPA 2.5 Page I of 3 d SPRINKLER HEADS 1 . The s andard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. . ! �d sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at th 4 If N6 have Mr e presgt s Yes C3 No 0 intervals thereafter. Due date for sampi testing: 2. The Quick.�`Res onse,sprinkler heads are less than- rs W&6r, Athi' P _j , r-wi in a, prescribed testing period. '0 Yes 0 No C3 - If "Noi'have,the heads samr)le tested or reDlaCed�Der2O6�8NFO�A25 an -aL N/A the1,p'res'ciibed intervals thereafter. Due' date for sample testinq: -3 The dry type sprink1sbegas are less than 10 years old or within a ib d t eriod. prescri e, est If '�'N o e heads.sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at. N/A 0 Yes 13 r �cri� escribed intervals thereafter. Due:datefor sample testing: GAUGES T e m ipce_c�l h fie sy§terii gauge's,is up-io-.date.. Due date:for the*noxt: compa st, . ... .......... Noti:-TM s�ste'm. gauges aria to be compared wi [5)* veryflVe I e is not -within 3% ofthe calibr it mu 6&dr.. 'Yes C3 N6-.0 ge it mly check should,be d 1606 floors at. stat bressureusn- '�auqe-aad_hydrju-T1_c on e-,callibratedij calculations, 94�TRUCTIO N INVESTIGATION , 'to, fi �Jhe eari5iD.�gEg'dti6n.investigatidn;,of Fire D6partment. Connection -(FDC),pipihdjs':Up- PA 25 C P A 2 h a p., 14. (eff. .1,012 ..,:date, in accordah6e wi hap 1/2012) Yes C3 . (�effl 0�/�I, �5C '.'!,:'Datd'f6r next D 3, obstr=ction, investiq a ��4.' stig 'b'" 606h exam for4he, FDC(s) included. iad�_or)eration,6 t he;chee 2,:'� The* 5.-.yearo 'stru- es It �18 s _,q � �_ �-� - Y C1 :No 3. The 5-year Obstruction Examination of thle-spraRFEer piping is up-to-date in accordan 6�i'�75_0 with 2008 NFPA 25 Chap. 14 (eff-lV2-1/2012) No 0 s ruction Examination Date for next Pioz= DRY STANDPIPE tested at not less than 200 psi or,. 50" psi, in-, 66cess,o : f maximum pressur I e where maximum pressure is in excess of 150 .0 Yes X. NO 1:3�::-.�`�..�� Z."Jhe stand pipe-Fire'Department Connection(s).(Fpp) is clear of bushes Yes No C3 d oth`e;r� debris and is visible from the street Vi 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 0 Yes No 173 4. or cover w s missih the pi:ping.-was inspecte a a g from a FDC Yes 0.. iNo'13. pt ris (t �L 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 13 Yes No 0 .�6. All swivels turn freely..:, ''N A Yes N FINAL CHECKS A..- 3hefire..'Allarth'w"as removed from test. mode and/or other precautionary. :-measures w6re:removed to restore iire ila rn s�stem tonormal.':- Yes d ""'IN116b"�.;, ope'rii6n,.(includes removal of protiec'thie.cove'rings).';' �I* 2. The system was left in service. Yes No 13 If "No", why 3. The confidence test report was given to the owner -and a,current status ta was,I56stecl.' Yes Na C3 U The confidence -test report was sent to the,fire niamhal' Yes r No C3 Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Testing SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST DRY 0 WET 0 DRY STANDPIPE �.Occupa'ncy� Address::': 336 Adrbira*l W6 '-'EdrTion&,' y,, N Occupancy ame. P. Edm hds 0 ,,,Responsible'. n P�r�o "First .o�-Last'N6' 6: hii6nvi P h one Number-,. '425 -7-74,,,',054 �.-:k6�oonsible'Pia��on�:-,,.---- 6Admira, ay--, I W `A d t 'S ate., o, d, res� ti y� i� A: 8020., Respbh�ibie Pa4" E-WilAddrem Si6 rm. !60�6nds.'b Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG i, Date, S Test quen:. Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. L System Location: 6) DEFICIENCIEs FOUND? Yes% No 13 List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet di -el orroc e ,;,REPAIRS: All f,6i,6,n-ci6s"'h'a"v"b,pon�ip,'" "t dl�`13- D t �'Corre'dted' B a e�, This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company - Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) C r7 C rNe, V1( Date Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable 0 Building Rep declined to sign report 0 ,el / -I / Is - Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 SPRINKLER HEADS 1 The standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. if 11 NolGve4w� ilaeads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed Yes No 13 intervals thereafter. �__i Due date for sample tesfin 2 �ears ol�d thin a 0 y or wiiandat �NIA� C3 Yes C3 r 12. 'The Quick Responses i are lels' No 13 prn 20 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" have the heads sample tested or replaced per--20 2-5 'the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for sample,te�sting: The dry type sprinkler heat!97—aee, lest thah.1 0:years; old. or within a �d t E, eri;d. prescrib �ril I "-r -ads sample tested or replaced per. 2008 NFPA 25 and at N/A 13. No 13 f "N@ ave the he the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for sample t6sti6g: GAUGES -is�up'_to-:dqte �:,,:,,The maintenance,on the -system -gauges -Due cWte E�ne�t�6iii��is'o�h:tes't:"-� -,..-Note: The -system' au PritOrl e,- �_ adih:zi calibriauge every fivigiiiii ges ate x1i s a,gaugpi n o 'hin sH Mda-d-edor No.0 car .'If s t -wit -i 3 f,.*, t Iii 6. 61 i b i a t 6e �dgg a u cgi ��ei ,.t�req �rllefl C I alillirated Th ---k should 166d - olors-at-s-Ta'r, 6ressu foL C v Wraulic all aude�� caliD61ati6ri OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION X,�w iik-, '-j he. &-year obstruction investigation of Fire''De'pa ment Connection (FDC) pipin, 1�*,u -to 9' 7 t ch' 1 (e 2 d8 0 P. 0 S ruc jj'�'Tdai ejn accordii witk'2008,,NFPA, 10/21/101 No C3—.- Dati for -next. u a.0 er gl ii, In Yes M No'. CV' op mex &The. 5-year. obstrudtio` ani:-f6rthe,FDCj(9 d "p. �va ve. M 3. The 5-year Obstruction E e sprinkler piping is up ice-----_ with 2008- Chap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) 13 Date for next Piping Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE Standpipewas hydrostatii6allyjb'�t&d bt4id.169i�jh6ri'200. psi or 50 psi,in access* of maximum, pife"'st u*ire is:in exidessoul 50.,-..' �N'/A es'll? ON pressure,iivh6r6�.ryilki4m-�'u'm": 7 psi e e ,Connection(s)�(FDC)Js clear of bushes _�`Th6 standpip 'Fire D'epari -N/A x _0 gpards,.or other debris 66d is yisible from the street' 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A (73 Yes No 0 If a plug or cover was missing from a F.DC the piping was inspected - N/A )q Yes .0 No 0-' .�Jcir-clebris. (t is is h rip-q'giri 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 13 Yes �111 No 13 6: All-wivels turn s freialy.'.' N/A No 173 FINAL CHECKS 1`.1*.,7he Fire arm was rem Al oved tr6m test mode arid/or other precautionary., to''normal. removed� to restore fire Marini sy-stieimi N/A No'cl petaitl6n. (inclu, es removal o protective d f coVi6rings). 2. The system was left in service. "No", Yes C3 Noo If why ayur KA rv�s" lit, The confidence, t6st're orfwas'igjven:toJhq own a' osted. p nd.-a current status,tag' No The.confidence -test- report was sent to the fire marshal's office. Yes 013 Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Resolved C3 Location: e 5 Cr Deficiency: Recommended Resolution: SFC and/or 2008 NFPA 25 reference: Resolved 11 Location: V Deficiency: V %Isk= Recommended Resolution: 1N C— SFC and/or 2008 NFPA 25 reference: Resolved C3 Location: Deficiency: V,6A.\�C', Recommended Resolution: SFC and/or 2008 NFPA 25 reference: Resolved 13 Location: Deficiency: )L Recommended Resolution: SFC and/or 2008 NFPA 25 reference: Resolved 0 Location: Deficiency: Recommended Resolution: SFC and/or 2008 NFPA 25 reference: Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 3 of 3 V K INcr Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Tes,ting SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST —DRY 0 WET 0 DRY STAN ccypanq . y- Ad :::0, dre's: 356Ad1miral,Waw-',Edmonds Ot6upa �,Name-, Port of Edmonds:- e P egdn.- Chfis Osterman Phone..Nu1mbV1:... 425.774-0549. fisl" 6:Ad .33 - mira ay��,-, d s,, -Edmonds'WA,98020 kies�`P� o n s'i 6 1W i;r�, E��Mail Addi Costermap@portof6dmon. sorg,-, Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG Riser Valve Make: 'e�st.' F rqqUp6 ar c -Ye' f1l" Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. System Location: DOCA4N DEFICIENCIES FoUND? Yes 11 No* List items that were not corrected at the time of. the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet c& nc ave,been C rrect6 D at This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Comp /nyw:Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) _ T)-l' C r-S M-C 1,1 & r- d Date 4� / -111,5-- Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 LER HEADS 1 . '%.t,'standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No".have the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed 6—�No 0 intervaf�-thereafter Due date for sample testing--- - 2-, The Quick Response sprinkler A�e;ad;s1ifL!i-I an �20 within a prescribed testing period. S. If "No" have the heads sample test replated per 2008 = -�ncl at NIA 0 Yes C3 No 0 s t r a r the prescribed intervals the e r. Due date for sample, ng: The dry type 'ereheads are less than 10 years old or within a Prescr 'r Pestpinag period, -A-;o%"0h`a'-ve, the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at N/A 0 Yes C3 No C3 the Prescribed intervals,thereafter. ,Oqe date for sample,tesilng: GAUGES ie m4ifnitenanC6,66"'466, val tern gauges Is up,46 5 r t M 4 n test to b Y!o N )uId b 100 d 04& &hv W"', IWO J 2 -7 OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION On 0 'e FIRA 25 Cho Yes.,01, bstq)6tJo�,`1'0# 'the' FOC(s) I jo� lawM 3. The 5-year Obstruction Exam!'D e s with 2008 NFPA 25 Chap-44. (eff. 10;;M /21/20 (3 No 13 Date for nexW�4 ' bstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE �A ,8x imum P ire, e otion rv�s debr f rom the the 6006 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 171 Yes No C3 0,,p.ug,,orcv ie� wcli m, IW60' from a FDC,tb, was Inso,'00 ed, ,,plp (thit i Y 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A M Yes A No C3 ""'AWsWivels turn freely,,!' N/A FINAL CHECKS 2. The system was left in service. If "No", why Yes No 0 P 7777= n -:'7 ence test, r6pqrt,was give give ,to the 0, 'tot h e T, fid ce te$tr report was t,to the,,fire,Mbrs Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Testing SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST DRY 13 WET 11 DRY STAN 6 d 6,! d Admirbl--%i6y Edmo' Ec6 on s ''Rbso6risible.Person-,-�. stermah Phone:,Number:' 425 774,0549, �.�,First Last -Name: Chris'o on —diiralMay - Resp si e, arty UE A' il�-.'R'6 s-'lJobs i bi 6 -n Rrg, C' a' h A E-Maial.*Ad&6�s . osterm n ,Edm*o,, sWx,98020 S '9 i�16-fedrfio�di";' Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG 06 e .',,,.Test' 'u. Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. - System Location: 0 C-� K DEFICIENCIEs FOUND? Yes 0 No List items that were not corrected a(the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet t-EPAIRS.-.',�,,."JMI,..-'deficieficieg..-.have-,be'en-,corr'e'c'te"d,-,'�E,l'.�,- A, N1 N--, 71 D" This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Techn Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) _ -9r,' c Y-) N e 11% C- %,-C ( Date Z-1 /-7 / /,S-- Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report 13 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 . . I SPRINKLER HEADS 1. The standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" have the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed Yes C3 No C] intervals thereafter. Due-d or sample testing: Z"Jhe Quick Res inkler heads are less than 20 years old or within a":, prescribed testing period. 'ested or replace �jO�NFP_A_25an at_� "N " ka e e 8-N N/A 173, Yes C3 No C3 -If o v the heads �ample tested or replac FPA 25 and at the prescrib led intervals thereafter. Due.date.for sample testing: :3."', The dry type,so.rinkler are less than 10 years old,or Within a res cribed�190ipgPeriod Jf "No24r��&-th.e heads sample tested or replaced per 2008,NFPA 25 and k�,-::,N/A: 0 Yes ��:No 0 'the prescribe ritervals thereafter. d i date' f6f,sample testin 9. 0R§jTRUCTION INVESTIGATION -he 5 itiztion investigation of Fire D�epartment Connection (FDC) pipingis up4o;.��._ ".,The 5-y ar- st ,-.da`te in abb6ij"' 25 Chi 14 (eff. 1,0/21 0 12) - Ye ,Date f6r,:n6x'* C, t,FD obstruction.investigat—io-M ,2.. 'WThje'5-y'e'_6r bbstru6tion dxairft fdrAhe FDC 8 iriclUded. te-s' ratZff.-6T;t_he-chec: - ;alve. Yes 13 3. The 5-year 0�bstruction Exa of the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accorda ��Yes�- with 20081�NFP ap. 14. (e�ff.10/2-� 1/2012) No 13 Date for - ext Piping Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE P I ,R-!',St6ndpi0e,was: ydrostati(�611V,,t&st6datyfibt-16�s7thah�200,�,��i,,bf.�5a'�''n- P h" m m 150... Yes access of zi�' um'press'u'r'b where maximum pressure is.in excess of 'N/A... 'Psi., ��Th6, standpioe Fire DeDartrent Co*nnection(s)'(FDC) is cleair-o bushes, N/A 'd- 's _77 Yes. No O�:. ,,_:,gqar. s, or other debris�an i yi.slb,lefror 1h street, 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A C3 Yes No 0 _:4_,._`*1f'a' p, lug�or cover was missing' rom a FDC,the piping-wasAnspected. 7 E, 0p4ris:--(this is require A Yes 0, No I!:-.:: 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A C3 Yes )b No 0 :7— ��6." All swivels* turn fie e*ly.*'.;. N/A No 0:' FINAL CHECKS 'I�-';,'Thia.Fird..Alarm',w'as.remo.ve'(J-ifrom te�t'nidd!6 and oroth ti ha er�precau ior ry, * , , , , , "* - re a arm�system,to!normql V�`, ,measures;.were:irerrioved.t6,,r6stcite. eraticin;(in�Iddes'r6mov0l,6f,'Orotectivi§ co -, _qP yerings . 2. The system was left in service. "No", Yes No C] If why i�;3_,.� i� ein be test repor I t was' e cu'r�6nt:§tatus ta4.vv'a"s:po'sted�:'*'��,',��,�:- given to, the own rand a Yes -No'o. id ,.,!V,.The dont 6n6e, test. riaport,was.sent to the4ire marshal's office. Yes, -No 171 Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South KIN& Seattle, WA 98134 NFPA 25 Testing V 206 6224656 SPRINKLER SYSTEm 5 YEAR TEST DRY 13 WET 71 DRY STANDPI Occupancy Address: 336 Adm.iral Way, Edmonds Occupancy Name: Port of Edmonds. -Responsible Person First &Last N8fme:., Chris Osterman Phone Number. 4.25 774 0549 Responsibl&Pemon 336 AdmiralWay, Responsible Party Address, Qity, Zlatel Zi Edftionds WA 98020 E—Mail Aadreiss Costiormah@portofedmonds.org Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG 4 requency 6�0 � --.&f , Dat f T _tF. 5 Year Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. GL System Location: DEFICIENCIES FOUND? Yes[] No PK List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet IREN 01406ies-ha4e beieimc briected 0 Corrected Bv: "�7 777777777- This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician ZIA & A - &! �—_ � -Phone#: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company" Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company - Seattle Washington Building Representative (sign ature) _�t- 1, t. 0 M eel 61 v-t I Date 4-1 /-r/ t5- Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable C3 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 Sprinklers NFP,A 25 Page 1 of 3 I I SPRINKLER HEADS 1. Th�tandard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "Nb" _R��the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed Yes 3,1�No Co intervals therieafter, Due date for sample te�s�.. ,a a 2. The Quick Response sprinkler heads,ar n.20 years old ��a rs 0' prescri ' bed testing period. )I t st 0 r O� C3 If "No" have the heads sample tested or rreep�l per 2008 and at NIA. 13 Yes No. 13 u f er the prescribed intervals thereafter. -hple'testing-.- Due date for sa :.3.. The dry type sprihkler.�s are less than.1 0 years old or Within a d prescri e L�Wiffgperio e Y N 0 If No"lay�.the heads sample ti sted or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at N/A, [1 Yes. No* C3. -thereafter. the prescribed intervals Due claiefor^sariiple testing: ,,b:AUGES -g o- The n1aintenzIric6'on the system auges is..up-4 clate�_ Due date for aMc with a calibrated-c ;Note:- The.system -gauges are tq..Bb-co,*#p d %�6ge every, five ypars.*:`0 ge'. ishotwithih,+/- Mofthe call ra e wiplaced or -Yes,.C].. No 0". �agap -recalib�aited..,-Thi�'check,!§hou d 66A e loors at's i essurF ta6c,p�rj:s:s:ure t I lRd"c"a'11dula ions. one.caiibratddfq�'a"u"'g'e*,- J. OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION i: The 51__yb"�!r ebzt'6.ction,inve� 6 .'(FDC) V piping As,Up7tO-.` �idati h of-Fird Department'Connectid'h: F. _.Aate in accorda 0*26t6 14.,'(eff., 1.0/21/201 2),� D a e. or n6kt-FDC-_obsthicti6n in. v-estiq t f a io f h' h k 2:.,:Thb 5-y6ar'6bste6dtion,exdm,for the FDC(s) included testing Md-.ep:�L' 0-c � po Ye s No. -�valve.' 4 Wam' 3. The 5-year Obstruction Exam . ation-oMe sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accordanc -es 173 with 2008 NIFPA 25-eh . 1 4jeff. 10/21/2012) Y No 13 Date forj3 ipin.q Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE 1-.'*1, Stai6dpip s y rostatically: tested no psi ofM.0sFM.,, e Wa' at flesslh6n* 2*00. d access -of maxim um,!pressure where maxim um,pressureAs in excessl6f 1*50,`-;�,-,,N/A C! Yes r en ,_The " standpipe Fir.6lDbpartm t.C6nnetti6n(�)�(FDC).is-plear.of,bUsheis NIA C3 Y A", e s '6rds' or, othb bl'.f h' . s ree sand-is� visi e rom-t 'Er' 6 t 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 0 Yes J� No 0 a r cover was missing.from afPC the piping was insoected N Yes��:d: No,, Z for i 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A C3 Yes No C3 7, 6 All swiyelsJurn freely., N/A. C3,:;.. Yes 0. N 0', FINAL CHECKS A 46Alarm�' d m test rii6de and/or,pther precauti was remove 4o' onary r ved to restore fire allcirrn Tpp��yres were. dmo - �removal,of �,.'qoper.ati on (incl6c!6� prbt6cfive: do'Ver rigs) 2. The system was left in service. Yes No C3 If "No", why "&�.-,The confidence test report wag 6n to:.thei. owner and a current st6tu�.tag was t d. pp.s,'e Ye S :At'�-'4he -confidence. test'repbrt Was sent to the, fire-marshal.'s. office, Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 NF I PA 25 Testing 2066224656 SPRINKLER SYSTEm 5 YEAR TEST DRY M WET 13 DRY STANDPIPE Occupancy Address: 336.Admira'l Way, Edmonds Occupancy Name: Port of Edmonds Responsible Person First & Last Name: Chris Osterman Phone Number: 425 774 0549." . ,:Re§ponsible Person* 336 Admiral Way, esponsible Party A8dress,'City, State, Zip:. R Edm6hds.WA..98020., E—Mail Address Coit6rman& ftofedmorid&org PQ Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG est: :.,Date of.T' Test Frequency:, 5'Year Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System Identification No. - 19-1, System Location: CY., DEFICIENCIES FoUND? Yes 13 No"% List items that were not corrected arthe time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet een do REPAIRS: -All�d6fici6ncieifia'��V*6'6'�"*�""., ttdcted 0 Corrected By:. Date. 7. - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) j��44 6 n Mt n 4re Date Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable 13 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 Sprinklers.NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 SPRINKLER HEADS 1. The standaed sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "NO" have the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed No (73 _F Due date for samp e-fe—M2-- :2. �;The Quick -R&sponse sprinkler heads- —arler16saA4an 20 -years pid-dr-Wiff7ina prescribed -testing period. If. le n d:a NIA �11 h heads sample tested or r6 I ".No" have t' e d or rep, 6per 2008 �NFPP Yes' 13 No.0 ft the prescribed intervals thereafte�r.. -for sample te Due date sting: -:3: The dry type sprink1sox-ATS are less than 10 years 'old or within.a prescri bed testigglienod. , " . I Ne h N P 2:,5 d at N/A C3 Yes -.0 No f he ested or replaced per 2008 n �o C3 the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date.for samr)le testinq: GAUGES 'to -date. ,#�W'-Th-e--m--anriteita4'Ge-Qo'-the �ystern gauges' is up bu'e':dat&(8 tke next com"li-o—n par 5) s are to be '�e;d d Not6:,T*he*'sy'stem giuge comrpar�witigh��iac au Ive year is not within +/- 30j�-,qf t ip. ca, .,rat I mus d.or s.- if-ago,uge, h lib'^ Yes 10:�: C1. 'r 661ibrat&&This�checlk should Pressure u q. 7 16,on e dalibra4ed _qawe:an44i4ffrauIic':1ba'I'- I" OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION M the b gation. bf..'F, ire Departmdfit,Connectioh',*(FD 0— . �(Q�,�truction,investi da 6 2608 NFPA'2*�-`6 t6 imaccordai e obsttuctio ate i6r:,ne�t� F0G+o �21�,,T h6 5-�eaCobstruttion exam for the Fpqf)� indcluDdLid da��ck . 0 N" 0' alve 3. The 5-year Obstruction Exa of the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in ac-cbTd9RcP_. with 2008 NFP ap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Ith �Yes 11 No 0 D:J:i�e�xtPirpt)riun�trulc4 Examf .q Obs�tion��i nation DRY STANDPIPE -0- tan 6.'�Vzis'h�dro�taticall�rt6stedl- n60es,,ttHan 200. psi or 5 pstin..., - -, '' - - .; ' ' S 'Y c . of,maximum, pre a?dn1um.lJ.r69gQreJs in excessW 150 ssure where'rn N/X-, - C3 rp . s ,01�1hb, standpipe nt Connbcti6n(s). (FIDC)'.'is,clear of bushes, Fire Departme 'Visible N/V C3 guairds,� or other debris'and is from the street 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 13 Yes No 0 '4.: -�,Ifa_ pW,l-u, g1_6r"6pve'r w`_as,_.rnissiWn,g, fr*om* ._q_`-f_b&t6 in'sp_*e_6�f(e_d._' N/X Y, e No 0 is 6d) q 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 0 Yes' No 13 7 w vels�Jurn fr I :,All 's i ee V N/A . . es 'No FINAL CHECKS Fire Allarm was removed: from test m6de:andibr" other precautionary )6sur4sowef6 remove&t6res rM. $ys tore fireala te!*p','tq',norma1 NAJ: 'Yes� 0 _0 rat C U s remcival of protective.cover ngs . 0 iohi(in'l de . 2. The system was left in service. Yes No 11 If "No", why The confidence test report was.given tothb bwnerand. a current status, tag was posted. Yes: No C3 The confidence test report was sent'to the fire, marshal's 'office.... No_C3_, Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 V, KIN& Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Testing SPRINKLER SYSTEm 5 YEAR TEST DRY 13 WET 13 DRY STANDPIPE Occupancy. AddregS." 336 Admiral d':*' Way,'Edmonds" Occu an� 'N" Port of E monds ame:. -R&06hsib'Ie-'P6r'S'6'n` er m' a b':- Phbh&�Num er---..1!.,::.3.i 425.77 S,-O§t' b 0549 -P� '7 336 Admir6lWay, Q Ity" wte"-Z e�p9q.-Oep iy�,'�,7, `�-,;Edm6nds!--WA 'C -3 4WO Wd 98020:,','�: osterrii6 &0�of6dmond n b S t-" Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Riser Valve Make: Certification No. 4851-0312-EG CVcr\ -�Ust+riaoUency----- Riser Valve Model: System Identification No.-5 System Location DEFICIENCIES FOUND? Yes C3 No 9 List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet ,� D OCK "5? 4, R E RA I R ';AJFddfidi16hcieis - haV6,Ibeen corrected.,,-. i` bUN&O This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action.' Signature of Technic . ian le Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) Date Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable 13 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 SPRINKLER HEADS 1. The standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" have the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed -- i7n-e-rv-a-rg-thereal,E� �._ Due date for sample te��2� 2. The Quick Response sprinkler, hieMs-are-less than 20 years old or within prescribed testing period. it If "No"'have the heads sample testead or replacedd ra(II-EPA 25 and at N/A 0 the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for sample testing:. 3. The dry type sprinkler h�a less than 10 years old or within a ,prescribed testing_pe�bd. If "No" haye�eads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at, N/A 13. the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due date for samole testinq: The maintenance on the sys e t dat Due date for the next,comparison test: Note: The system gauges, are to, be'compare withacali go-exor f (5) _y ive years. If a gauge is.not within +/- 3% o a e gauge it m t be re plaz"-Gr, recal ibrated,. 1his check, ne for multiple floors at static pressure:using, Yes C3 No 173 Yes 13 No 11 Yes �ONO 13 Yes 0-. NoO OBg!IUCTION INVESTIGATION 1. The 5-yea—r-obstruclLon investigation, of Fire Department Connection (FDC),pipirfg ipmp-to- __M PA-25 Chap. No C3 date in,accordance*with 8-NF 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Date for next FDC,bbstruction investigation for the FDC(s) included testi�rf �opmoc&ofthecheck Yes CI No 0 AW. 3. The 5-year O�bstruc mination of the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accordance t 00 No 0 with �2008 25 =hap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Yes r xt Pipi 0 structior Da r next Piping Obstruction Examination I DRY STANDPIPE 4. ,St�ihdpipe�A�ias'hydr6stbtically tested at not,less than 200 psi or 50 psi in. ...access of maximum pressu re where maximum pressure is in excess of 150 N/A 13 Yes No C3 psi. 2. Thestandpipe Fire Department Connection(s) (FDC) is clear of bushes, N/A 0 Yes No 0 guards, or other debris an.d is visible from the street, 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 0 Yes 39 No 173 4._� -If a plug* or cover was missing from a. FDC the piping was inspected N/A Yes' 0 No 0., (this is,re_�uirdd). 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 13 Yes %6L No 173 6i:. All swivels turn freely. N/A C] Yes No C3 FINAL CHECKS 1.; Th6,Fir6 Allarmwas removed from test mode and/or other precautionary I 'meqs`6rei,we r6removed t o I restore fire alarm syste I m to normal, N/A Y4� No C3 operation (includes removal of protective covering$). 2. The system was left in service.. Yes No C3 If "No", why 3. The confidence test report was given to the owner and a current status tag was posted. Yes No C3 4'.. The confidence test report was sent,to the fire marshal's office. Yes No 0 Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 2066224656 NFPA 25 Testing SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST DRY 13 WET 0 DRY STAN Occupancy Address: 3.36Ad Mira 1. Way, Edimon,�s . . Occupancy Name: Port of, Edmonds..-, ,�-Respohsible?erson - N b ChHs`0std&nah um er:,. -33&, AdAieai way, eispdnsibbe Oarty Cosi 6a6@poqofedrnond , s.org" -,E"Mall Address p Edmdnds:WA.9802&,,�.' Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG 'of 5,',,;Y! P �TO rque -Test;,F nc� Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: SysterifIdentification No. - _T System Location: DEFICIENCIEs FoUND? Yes 11 No 0 List items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet ;�AEPAIRS: �A[defI606616s;f eewcorrectiad �J: a e t . 7 �7- This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NFPA Standards. T e discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician, Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Company: Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington Building Representative (signature) At ri e. r c I —Date ZVI 7115 Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable 13 Building Rep declined to sign report C3 k.,;. _ Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 1 of 3 �� I SPRINKLER HEADS 1 The standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" have the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed irltervals thereafter. Me-date4w_samele testing: .2.�:-7h.e-Pulick Response—s-prirrWepheads are less� than I 20years, old -or -with' prescribed testing period. P 'if �"No" have the heads sample tested or reblaced.DdZ <NFPA25 and at N/A 0. -the prescribed intervals thereafter. DueAbte for sample te ting: J3._* - The.dry typelspri�nk�IE are less than 10. years old or within' a pr es cribq�g period. JVA_o�-Wve the heads sample tested or replaced -per. 2008 NFPA 25 and at N/A 13 the prescribed intervals thereafter. Due ? date'. fo r sample testin.q: Yes-J3--'No 0 GAUGES t a P.Qe_o�e sys em g�augesi,is.upA6.- bde,&t:6 for., the next comparison teST;,17__7_'___.1. k 6te f h6l"system gauges are to�be q*omF'jdr,6dwj es:. No; C3 "if, A`gauge is not wit 4.414Wta-fiffir e. Ila' C3. ntati� pressure usin 0' rs, it jh!��s cali6ria'ieid.' ni =11dkii�'A rated'qauge and hvdira6lieda`116611�tio` ns-.,:. - OB41SUCTION INVESTIGATION Depart 'yec avq§pgation- piping is UP40-,, 6— -The,,.5- airo s1ruMior+4 of, Fire, ment Connection'(FDC 14" 'Glua 3.,- 2) with 2008 NFP ovnext D f FDC.obstruction investidbtio�-, ate f tK1 or. e�� L,; il c op a �q e c eq T 6:5 1 :g) 9,1 ��ili fien f th h k h �joa'r.bbstruction exam 'y 3. The 5-yea 0 c ion Examination of the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accordance wit��NFPA 25 Chap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Yes 0 No C3 Aratp fnr nAyt Piping Obstruction Examination DRY STANDPIPE �,",I,t'�"StandpioO.was'hydrostatically test6d:at?hotj1less'than,200 psi.or 50 psi in acpess ol maxim.um.pressure where maximum. pressure.(s in excess o f 150, N/� Yes 0, Psi., -2. The es, ,w.� _standpipe Fire Department Conn6ctiori(s)_(FPC).is clear of bush y debris and is: visible Irom i6e'. s tr'eek'.� 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A C3 Yes No C3 74_._-_�1f'-a'0lu_g'or' cover was missing -from a was-,inspected�. /A j Yes 0 No- 13" -for debris.. -Jthis is'recliluired)' 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A C3 Yes No C3 '6;" All �swiv*els'turn freely. �..,N/A 0 Y es -.777- "No 0, FINAL CHECKS :,J�' "The-Fireii Alarm was, removed from testmo.de and/or other, prqcautionar y -measures were removed to re o q.fire'alarrn�system,to normal st r N/A Yes�, C3 'j �:,,,operatidinh (inciludesi removal of protective*66verings)Z, 2. The system was left in service. Yes "'A No 0 If "No", why 1� The confid6n'be t6st.reporfwas given.to:the owner and a current stdtus-t6g.Wbs.'bosted..-,,.��'- Yes" ..A. :..The, 6onfidence,,test report was 'sent to the fire ma'rshal's.office. Yes'. �NoO Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 3434 First Avenue South KIN& Seattle, WA 98134 NFPA 25 Testing 2066224656 SPRINKLER SYSTEM 5 YEAR TEST- DRY C3 WET 13 DR'Y STANDPIPE IT T-;� I ay, 0 Port 0 336 Admira M'' Edmon,.s 'Address:-' fEdmonds. Ppapcy-, ,Aame: e erson Respbn§ibI P Chris,Ositbrman !,'Ph6h6 N.Un b 425.7-74.'0549' "336 Admiral Way,*. Respbritible'Person i1N. , - � Kqspohsi0lp.�Fqrty:. S Z a,Addji6gs�i Costerm*and�oirt&edmon s.or "M ": 'r It 11 d E Technician's Name: Daniel Lewis Certification No. 4851-0312-EG "requency,,.. -17, N ODatftfi Riser Valve Make: Riser Valve Model: System" Identification No. System Location: DEFICIENCIEs FOUND? Yes 173 No V List items that were not corrected at %e time of the confidence test. Use the Deficiencies section or attach itemized sheet �,R'EP.AIRS:�,-,-Ali'ddfidi6fi6ids h ave.bee'rf66 6ie - I ,Cdif6dt6d By: ",.,,D t a e: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly tested in accordance with NPPA Standards. The discrepancies found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Technician Phone #: (206) 622-4656 Name of Testing Compan': Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company — Seattle Washington y Building Representative (signature) 7�rlek? Merll(jel Date Z/ /7 Print Name and Title Direct Phone # Email: Building Rep unavailable 13 Building Rep declined to sign report 0 Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page I.of 3 SPRINKLER HEADS 1 . The standard sprinkler heads are less than 50 years old or within a prescribed testing period. If "No" have the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFPA 25 and at the prescribed Yes� intervals Ihereafter. Due date-FU7-�5�1�ssting: '2. The Quick Respoi.n,se:sprin s are less than afsTtff `®rvOthin ai prescribed testing period 'If "No" h s or replaced per 00 ave the heads ample C3 Yes C3 the presc�ibed interva eafter. e testing: Due date for99FF== 3. The cl��e sprinkler heads are. less tha* n 10 years old or within a prescribed testing period. �Yes If "No" ha-ve the heads sample tested or replaced per 2008 NFP I A 25,and at: ..N/A '7,0 the prescribed intervals. th`6reafter. D:' ' dai 46" ue te Csamble testina: No C3 No C3 No C3 GAUGES Th*q_cQ'initbriancie on -the system gauges isup-toi-date. :'buld.dat r e� 7�3 'Notb: Th e-i �system� gauge's are I o b :j!!,d..i iqu eiev6ryfive t i 6�� 'of the calibrate g t cl I I ri" , d-pr .-Yes 0 N o 0 years.,- If a gaug in d ao6e�-!tjil�g rep.lacA Is checks o b' done for multl�le f ors at. 'i, -erecalfta h uld, e 101 s atidibr6ssure usInq77 'eand'hydraulic calculations. I 0B9YQ1CTION INVESTIGATION ti "ti -of Fir6'Department Co+nhe'c'tio'r*.' _v f!.s iga ion j,(FDCj1pjping is,up� o NoCl+ �A "in eff. 10/21/20 date" -25 Chap�'14. a -heit `FDQ-6bttruc'tioin` i6vestigation' e eXam,for the FDC(s),� included t6stin c .2 Th '5'_� &161;c"O ch.e k' Yes 13 No 0 :.,v 3. The 5-year Obstruction Exam' n �f the sprinkler piping is up-to-date in accordance 0 (eff 10 with 2008 >NFP 2&_ ap. 14. (eff. 10/21/2012) Yes 0 No 11 Date for n Pipinq Obstruction Exam ination DRY STANDPIPE than 200 psl� 014i.,50. 0 "si, ac :cess,6f mum oressure where maximum pressure isin exce! ..Y s e No "'ps -2,�-7T[ie�stbbdOip6-Firb Department Coninedon(s)(FDC) is cl6ar-of,busWE es.. "bri' N/A Y es No 0 .711-1 h or ot e is i sand vsi e m the street 3. All FDCs and hose valves have protective plugs or caps. N/A 0 Yes No C3 .4. If a plug or cover was mi�sihqfrom a FDC the pipingwas inspec e ( __ q41 !his is �q, N/A Yes C3 No 0: 5. All caps and plugs have at least 12" clearance for operating wrenches. N/A 0 Yes No 0 6. - All:�WiVels turn freely. N /k Ye No 0 FINAL CHECKS Aiarrn 'was remove j de ani dfrom`iesfilrici Nor oth6r'6r6 ary cautior �s stem to n I N/A:-., Measures were removed to':66siorelire, larm. y orma tYps. No eiratibn (includes removal protecti� S). e,covering 2. The system was left in service. If "No", why Yes No C3 3. �-,The confidence test report was give'rit6 'the owner and, a currentstatUs ta� was posted.. i.Yes No C3 ��he confidence,test report Was sent -to thefire marshal's office.. - - C31. . _No. Deficiencies Sprinklers NFPA 25 Page 2 of 3 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 1 3434 1 st Ave S Seattle, WA 98134 206.622.4656 TRANSMITTAL Apd123,2015 Edmonds Fire Department 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Fire Prevention Unit Project: Inspection Reports DESCRIPTION ADDRESS Port of Edmonds (114 systems, 5-Year Testing) 336 Admiral Way Sincerely, Mary Yesulaites Inspection Coordinator AAA Fire and Safety, Inc ................................. ��M�ENT 17�1� 3013 3d Ave. No. Confidence Testing ACCOUNT# Seattle, WA. 98109 DATE (800) .223-.3473 FIRE ALARM Addres, �; 76*"' MrA4 (A*_ City EDMONDS Zip 98020 Occupied as Fori OT eamonds Building Owner PORT hone # (425) 774-0549 W W Address 170' City EDMO Zip 98020-7214 Date of Inspectio 03/04 /ffyoe f inspection Annual Tester's Name Mark Hagen Control Panel - N ka Mode a SFD Certificate # SCP- H00040 No. of Initiating Circuits 1 No. of Signal Circuits 1 Battery Voltage Battery Voltage under Load _ (signals operating) Charge Voltage 1 . Trouble signal with A/C power off Na 2. System operates satisfactorily on standby power Na 3. All auxiliary equipment operates (elevators, fans, dampers, etc.) —Yes 4. All signals operate on A/C power Yes 5. All notification appliances checked for proper operation Yes 6. All circuits checked for electrical supervision Na 7. Control panel checks per manufacturer's instructions Na 8. Central station or remote connection —Na 9. Name of monitoring company Acct#: 10. Key to Danel available Type OF Equip # of Units Tested Satisfactory # of Total Units Bells, Horns, Chimes Voice Alarm Speaker Visual Alarm Devices Trouble Indicators Flow Switches Supervisory Switches Smoke Detectors yp-cz Heat Detectors Manual Pull Stations Ventilation Control Ops. Central Station Annunciators Elevator Call Down Fire and Smoke Damper Phone Jacks Door Unlocks (fail safe) Door Release Chemical elease Other Problems found: None Corrections Made: Date Corrected By: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN PROPERLY TESTED AN INSPECTED FOR RELIABILITY TO COVER THE ITEMS LISTED IN THIS REPORTS Signature: RAorL- W-annn Electrical License WonnnmKn1')r1 Serving Briet; Edthonds, at id 1 �9425 Meridian Ave S Mounfldke'Terrace Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT 0 EDMONDS 0 BRIER 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 0 UNINCORPORATED FREOUENCY STATION & SHIF') LOCATION: 326 Admiral Way 08020 Annual 17--C BUSINESS NAME: Parl. Of Ed mcInd-b (:)I I icc PHONE: 4257714054 0 SCHEDULED Am 2014 II' DATE DUE — MAILING LIFIR 1,. 428 ADDRESS: 33E Admiral Way, EdITxInds, WA 108020 BUSINESS OWNER: yA*wq=@wIh HOME PHONE: 112-q- �Ofa - -7,+g 0 S EMERGENCY-1: PurL CY bdawIndti HOME PHONE: .42L774M540 e� CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS 0 El EMAIL: LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: io-IRE SYS I LMS,: FE in 113 �4 HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 1 EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: I INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 t 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 114 8 4 .8 DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 LETTER NEEDED [] YES NO LETTERNEEDED F] YES El NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY FIRE PREVENTION Serving Briet,* Edtnon4�, and 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT 0 EDMONDS Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 El BRIER Phone (425) 551-1200, 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE Twww.FireDistrictl.org .1 Fax (425) 551-1272 [1 UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: 336 Admiral Wav Suite A 2SUD Annual I 17-C PHONE: 4 257 7 4 9 8 7 4r: -.' SCHEDULED Aun 2014 BUSINESS NAME: lop DATE DUE Pot 4- v-P MAILING LIAR ADDRESS: 33B Admiral Way, Suk A, Edimn&-, WA 0802C BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: EMERGENCY-1: Lif4�� HOME PHONE: 429TF-�U "'CURRENT YES NO KEYACCESS-2: PoF_ HOME PHONE: CITY 4 7-C- 509 --7 4 Of 0 BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE o o PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: Ir- I HE SYS I E ME: FE,1112 I okg HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS o 2 2 3 //z 3 771, 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X lst RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE, 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE- EXTENSION GRANTEDTO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE- VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: I INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION, 5 3 7 1 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 8 _ 4 8 DATE, DISPOSITION: 7 \. LETTER NEEDED [:] YES NO LETTER NEEDED [-] YES NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY v(* -=Emu, w V_ ff— a— 0— -7� -A\PR 0 7 2014 CONFIOENCE TESTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TEST REPORT NAME OF FACILITY PHONE NO. o DATE INSP%ION A/ ADDRESS t9 /n , a L wn CITY 'e4 om O"f, STATE ZIP OCCUPIED AS MONITORED BY /I L Al M r- rn ACCT# ys- _(F9.0 TYPE OF TEST MONTHLY EJ QUARTERLY JW SEMI ANNUAL El ANNUAL El ACCEPTE] I PRO-COMM LICENCE BATTERY VOLTAGE VOLTS BATTERY UNDER VOLTS IFULLLOAD v. CHARGE CIRCUIT VOLTS ITEM YES NO N/A ITEM YES NO N/A ITEM YES NO N/A TROUBLE AC OFF CIRCUITS16HECKED FOR SUPERVISION SYSTEM WIRING CONFORMS TO NFPA STANDARDS SYSTEM OPERATES ON STANDBY POWER CONTROLPANELCHECKED PER NFPA 91�6 INSf 'K - — ?kNEL_ EY TO P AVAILABLE SIGNALS OPERATE ONACPOWER AUXILIARY EQUIP. OPERATES OTHER SIGNALS OPERATE STANDBY POWER OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS AT PANEL OTHER EQUIPMENTTESTED NO. OF UNITS SATISFACTORY NO. OF UNITS SATISFACTORY TYPE OF EQUIPMENT IN BLDG. TESTED YES I NO I N/A TYPE OF EQUIPMENT IN BLDG. TESTED YES NO N/A BELLS, HORNS, CHIMES, VOICE ALARM, SPEAKE14S ANNUNCIATORS VISUAL ALARM DEVICES ELEVATOR CALL DOWN HEAT DETECTORS DOOR RELEASE SMOKE D ETECTORS L( FIRE & SMOKE DAMPERS MANUAL PULL STATIONS PHONEJACKS SPRINKLER' SUPERVISORY SWITCHES AUTO DOOR UNLOCKS (FAIL-SAFE) SPRINKLER FLOW SWITCHES OTHER 2 -)�C( 2 CENTRAL STATION VENTILATION CONTROLS OPERATE -OTHER OTHER PANEL AND MODEL ��rvT OTHE R SERVICE TECHNICIAN NOTES Fire Watch required, threat level 1 2 3 (see reverse for a threat level explaination) xi.<m r f,::�euw- THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS FIRE ALARM HAS BEEN PROPERLY TESTED AND INSPECTED FOR RELIABILITY TO COVER ITEMS LISTED IN THIS REPORT, IS CONSISTENT WITH FIRE ALARM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS. OWNER WAS INFORMED ABOUT ANY NEEDED REPAIRS OR DISCREPANCIES. NONE YES OWNER OR FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE DATE TECHNICIAN LICENSE NO. -5 8 V'M 4SIGNATURE Serving Brier, Edmonds SNOHOMISH CO. Mountlake Terrace,and 001, F I R E �('011. 411 D)15 I the Town of Woodway DIS'TR'N'Twww.FireDistrictl.or-a LOCATION: 336 0 Way A� Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Yacht Sales FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT A—EDMONDS 0 BRIER 0 WOODWAY 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 0 UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIF'*' Annual 17-13 SCHEDULED DATE DUE � Aug MAILING LIFIR 411 A�,. ADDRESS: 336 Admiral Way A,', BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: Email: EMERGENCY-1: Liiinane, Group Corp- ROME-P E: 42577492 "CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: S(,,o77 (Ool) -713- _LIC INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: j cr—T FIRE SYSTEMS: FE o'! 12425 Meridian Ave S Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 Fax (425) 551-1272 PHONE: 4257748873, HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: I INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 14 18 4 8 DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 LETTER NEEDED [] YES No LETTER NEEDED [3 YES El NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY (0MV6 T Fire & Soafcelcy " Inc rd A— M 3 C) 13 3 V 1::� ! 14 Seattle Wa 98109 206-284-1721 info@aaafire.com /A01C,r#Q6M - 2k3 !�9 h*x-6 Fire Depa-1-tment C-onfirl,once —1 �st Report Confidence Tesviing Officer (fax) Red Tag Hotline HRE ALARM or"IYSTEP0 Ce.rtlfication Given (One System per Report) Fi CONFIDE . NCE TEST REPAIRS FHITE ,I Occupancy Address: 32(o kvz,�4 \�i Occupancy Name: City, State, Zip Responsible Perso'n First & Last Name: Phone Number: q-zK----nq 65 c1q Responsible Persori Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E-Mail Address Date of. 1h.'spedow., Inspection Quartierly [I (High-rise Only) Frequency[Type-. Annual,.-,*, Testers Name (PIea'sePri_nt):' SFD-Cdrtification-- Number: scp- Central station.monitoring? Monitoring Required? Yes 171 N o- Monitoring lk Yes 0 No Company Name: System Make: 1210 System Model': \,3 P,\e �%C�04 S., ys em ocafion li�, Identification. Number: PROBLEIVIs Fnu�!D, (If nr UORRECTIONS MADE: (if additional room is needed, r Date Corrected: Corrected By:*. @se add a separate sheet) Sr'D CertiflicaLlOn Number: SCP - -------------- eC e -4 This certifies !hatthis fire and- life -safety -system has -bee. prop riyinsp , U fuoir felliabilitly, I - Items listed in this report and is consistent -with Seattle Fire Depa'rtmu"ht Fire' Code stand'�rds', and that discre"p,an6es a!re noted and have been reported to the building:Owne'r/Manager for corildcti�&'�a�cfion. �Signature of Tester- Phone # Testing Agency: ikkA Fire &_Sa el,�, Inc Mailing Address.- 30133 d Ave N Seattle, Wa 98109 Building Representative (signature) The'it6ms on'the checklists belo w''shall be inspected and tested. his lis- I Ii L G'OeS I-iC-'L constitute all of the required inrnprfir�g and teStinn of .1h-fire and S-f--" System. efe r to t � e s ea tt 1 e rN . . m -Ly L Me ire uepaitment Fire Code tor inspecting and testing requirements. L Ali rm, System Functionality 1. Trouble signal with AC power off? V \1 �A, es 171 No C1 System opera es pro y' "ja_ v _.p�r_l:'6n�6�ftery: backup? -Y es.. 0 Battery voltage (no load) ts �-L' BatAe*ry,'Vdlta'9e..(full; oad,)." fts yo.ltls (signals operakrig) volts 5. Charge circuit voltage :6" S _y5tem: operate's 0�oper.y�on' stanc by power? Y.e�scj No.0 7. All signals operate on AC power? Yes 8'. 'Numb-er, 'o'f*i"nit*ia'tin'�".�.ircLjjts' N 0. 0 9 - Number of signal circuits 10. Does. m n al� i.sy'5Lem m'6et audibiky_�tp clards as accepted? .-Yes N 0 11. All circuits checked for electrical supervision? 0, :... 1. 1—- 1. - Yes No 0 au. i.iary.,eqqipmen, -s)? - I .. '_ - - - - .1 - -C ' pera es ns, cla,mpe 12,- All X. Elevat6rs',J6 N/A Ye�' �r' No C] 13. Ventilation controls operate? N/A Yes C] No' k, ey to:p+�ne a Yes ce, No 15. Operating instructions at panel? Yes No t 6 n ica Ors� unctibil prbp�dy? Yes�, -No' I Remote Annunciator Panels function properly? N/.. 1. 1 ..' i2'��4'.':." . . , *i.� 5. . ' A Yes 0 No 8 El6vatq,,�_aj-DoWn, ions p. op�ryj: N/A J!j Yes: t�� 19. Test record bosted at iDanel? ies No 0 2,Q General ila'Iri'I'a o' N/A 21. Was a signal reiceived at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A Yes 0 No 0. Sped Y -9 _77 ' Total ota ' Total Number r Number Devices F U of Units in L Units n its __�jystem 23. Bells, Horns; Chimes, uil Buildin st Tested r Test Results Acceptable 24. Voic I e. S.pea.-kers (Voice Clarity) PI/ N A - Yes El No C1 2.5; SmokeDetectors. NP �.Yes No 2 6. Heat Detectors N/A Yes 0 N o [i 2 7.. Dd�t: Detect o.rs:,.. NIA Y e s o 28. Sprinkler Flow Switches N/A Yes [I No 9 Pririkl�e.:.Sqpervisbry-'S' h Vjtc es N/A y yes 11 No cj� 7) J..0. V . i . sual Alarm DevicCles N/A 17( Yes 0 No [I 31.. fv.1anu.al:P!ull-Statibhs* 32. &WMVftt0'P 91Q. C ji� N/A Yes 0- No CI NIA C1 Yes No C1 33. Beam Detectors N/A Yes 0 No CI 31. Automatic Door .. Unlocks N/'4, Yes 0 35. AutornaLic Door Rel�; as.e . N/A Yes 0. 0 36. Fire Da*mpq:rs,:.every 4 yrs. NIA Yes C3 No Communication ECIL]ipment Total Number of Units in Building Total Number Units Tested 37.. Phone Sets,. Test Results Acc-p-1-1- N/A Yes 0 No 38. Phone Jacks NIA Yes 71 No 39. Call -in Siantil 1\1 /A I I ';-� . Updated 12/05/12 at 9:27 AM EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL EXTENDED AGENDA Please note that tlw Extended Agenda is subject to change. DECEMBER 18, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Meeting � Consent: Employment Contract for Senior Executive Assistant to City Council Jana Spellman � Consent: Law Support Collective Bargaining Agreement. � Continued Public Hearing on the Planning Board recommendation to approve the 2 Hours Port of Edmonds request to incorporate the Port's Harbor Square Master Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Harbor Square Master Plan envisions a mixed - use transit -oriented development. The mixed -use nature of the Master Plan will allow for retail, commercial, office and public uses, and residential housing. The Master Plan could provide 340 to 358 residential units, 50,400 square feet of retail, 9,784 square feet of office, 123,410 square feet of recreational health club uses (including tennis courts), 3.8 acres of public open space, and 1,091 spaces of off-street parking. The Master Plan envisions buildings of varying heights, up to a maximum of 55 feet conceptually, buildings up to 35 feet are proposed for the SR-104/Dayton Street intersection while buildings of 45 feet are proposed along Dayton Street (with step -back provisions for portions above 35 feet). Five story buildings (up to 55 feet in height) could be located toward the far southern edge of the site. � Annual Report — City Attorney 15 Min. � Yearend 2012 Budget Amendment 10 Min. � Public Defender Contract 15 min. � Prosecutor Contract 15 Min. � Resolution of Intention to establish a BID stating the time and place of a public 10 Min. hearing. � Report on City Council Committee Meetings of December 11, 2012. 15 Min. **DECEMBER 24 & 25, 2012 — Christmas Holidays** NE'WYE*nD - 42M 0 130 **JANUARY 1, 2013 — New Year's Day / Hohday** JANUARY 8, 2013 City Council Meeting followed by Committee Meetings � Selection of Council President for 2013 5 Min. � Selection of Council President Pro Tem for 2013 5 Min. 0 Committee appointments for 2013. 5 Min. City Council Committee Meetings 0 Finance Committee A. Monthly Financial Report. 10 Min. B. Public comments (3-minute limit per person) 10 �3 3 G ae-� ) -2- J-1 ) 1 2— New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan APRIL18,2012 Revised for Planning Board Review August 29. 2012 INTRODUCTION The Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan has been prepared as an amendment to the Port's Master Plan. Its purpose is to provide a framework and solid foundation for the eventual redevelopment of the 11 -acre site into an economically feasible, environmentally responsible, and well -designed mixed -use transit -oriented development in the City's Downtown Waterfront District. Harbor Square is an important component of the Port's overall property holdings and when redeveloped will further the Port's statutory directive of "engaging in economic development programs" to benefit constituents of the Port District as well as the overall Edmonds community. The Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan provides important site planning and design principles to be used for future development plans. The preparation and adoption of the Plan is in the midst of a multi -phased planning process. Completed, ongoing, and future phases include: Phase 1 (complete) Prepared a generalized fiscal impact analysis of site redevelopment scenarios. Phase 2 (complete) An extensive outreach program to define the community's preferred use, connections, and design principles for the Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan. Phase 3 (ongoing) Port Commissioners will adopt the Redevelopment Plan into the Port Master Plan. Following Planning Board public hearings and action by the Edmonds City Council the Redevelopment Plan, if approved, will be incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Phase 4 (Future) Following approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment by the Edmonds City Council, The Port will market the project to solicit responsible development interests. With the selection of a developer by the Port, negotiations between the Port and City will occur to address project issues including rezoning of the site, site layout, design issues, impact mitigation and other site development issues. Resolution of project issues will likely occur through the preparation and approval of a rezone and/or development agreement involving the City, the Port and the selected developer. Upon approval of the development agreement by the Edmonds City Council construction documents will be prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval. Implementation of the Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan is intended to occur over several years, depending on the economic climate, existing lease arrangements and site planning considerations. REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND CONCEPT The Port has identified opportunities to redevelop the Harbor Square site with a mix of residential, office, and retail uses that promote economic development, environmental responsibility, and a high quality design character. The redevelopment concept includes increased public access opportunities and other amenities that capitalize on the site's waterfront setting and adjacency to Edmonds Marsh. Public benefits include an expanded tax base, increased downtown activity, enhanced connections between downtown and the waterfront, an improved pedestrian environment, promotion of transit oriented development, improved ecology, and increased waterfront view opportunities with public gathering places. Consistency with Edmonds Comprehensive Plan This Master Plan is consistent with the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and pursues a number of the Plan's goals and policies. Most of the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies relevant to Harbor Square are located in the Waterfront Activity Center element. Below are some of the goals and policies from that element that guide this master plan. Additionally, the Physical Design Principles included in this Master Plan implement the design -specific Comprehensive Plan policies which are listed in that section. Comprehensive Plan goals and policies are identified in "italics. " Comprehensive Plan Goals Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a destination for visitors from throughout the region. Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest pedestrian links and pedestrian -oriented design elements, while protecting downtown's identity. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Emphasize and plan for links between the retail core and these supporting areas. New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan 2 Develop gatewaylentrance areas into downtown which serve complementary purposes (e.g. convenience shopping, community activities). 0 Explore alternative development opportunities in the waterfront area, such as specifically encouraging arts -related and arts -complementing uses. Comprehensive Plan Policies 0 E 1. Ensure that the downtown waterfront area continues - and builds on - its function as a key identity element for the Edmonds community. E 5. Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline by encouraging mixed -use development and pedestrian -oriented amenities and streetscape improvements, particularly along Dayton and Main Streets. Development in this area should draw on historical design elements found in the historic center of Edmonds to ensure an architectural tie throughout the Downtown Area. E 8. Improve and encourage economic development opportunities by providing space for local businesses and cottage industries and undertaking supporting public improvement projects. E 9. Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities. Improve public access to the shoreline and link waterfront features by establishing a continuous esplanade along the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and Shoreline Master Program requi . rements placed on private development. E 11. Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, downtown commercial activity and visitors from throughout the region. a E 12. Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial, and cultural activities. The Comprehensive Plan identifies individual districts within Edmonds Waterfront. Harbor Square is located in the "Downtown Master Plan District" and the Comprehensive Plan describes the intent for this district as quoted below: Downtown Master Plan. The properties between SR- 104 and the railroad, including Harbor Square, the Edmonds Shopping Center (former Safeway site), and extending past the Commuter Rail parking area up to Main Street. This area is appropriate for design -driven master planned development which provides for a mix of uses and takes advantage of its strategic location between the waterfront and downtown. The location of existing taller buildings on the waterfront, and the site's situation at the bottom of "the Bowl,"could enable a design that provides for higher buildings outside current view corridors. Any redevelopment in this area should be oriented to the street fronts, and provide pedestrian -friendly walking areas, especially along Dayton and Main Streets. Development design should also not ignore the railroad side of the properties, since this is an area that provides a "first impression" of the city from railroad passengers and visitors to the waterfront. Art work, landscaping, and modulated building design should be used throughout any redevelopment project New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan Planning Principles The concept diagram on the next page illustrates the planning principles developed during Phase 2 of the planning process. The principles serve as design objectives and form the basis for the Plan Elements. The design intent as it relates to the uses, building character, circulation and parking, public spaces, and sustainability is defined below. N. 6 3 10 10 *."J LEGEND Pedestna oriented storefronts and Vehicle access and parking activities n Residential village . . . . . . . Primary pedestrian route > Galway architectural elernent 5 0 a N a Attractive streeiscape edge 0 Village plaza 0 Mixed -use Principles 1 . Create a pedestrian entry and visual gateway at the Highway 104 / Dayton Street intersection which is the key link to downtown Edmonds. 2. Create an attractive street front along Highway 104. 3. Feature pedestrian -friendly facades and uses along Dayton Street W. 4. Establish a pedestrian -friendly esplanade with adjacent activities between the plaza (1) and the marsh. 5. Connect pedestrian walkways to linkages around the marsh. 6. Provide vehicular access into the site from Dayton Street W. 7. Provide direct pedestrian access to the marsh from Hwy 104. 8. Create a pedestrian focus such as a village green or plaza in the center of the redevelopment. 9. Locate residential development in the southeast portion of the site. 10. Locate parking near the western perimeter, next to the railroad, within a parking structure designed to serve the entire redevelopment 11. Architectural character should emphasize a "Northwest Style" compatible with the rest of downtown and feature high quality traditional materials and a variety of colors, forms, and textures. 12. Provide improved vegetation buffers to protect and enhance the Edmonds marsh. 13. Provide for a wel I- landscaped, Northwest -oriented, small town design theme. New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan PLAN ELEMENTS The Port will incorporate the following elements into the redevelopment of Harbor Square through design guidelines or conditions of purchase/sale agreement(s). Uses and Site Planning a Create a "village" character with pedestrian gathering spaces. a Create an attractive street front along SR104 as an entry into downtown, with a pedestrian and visual "gateway" at the SIR 1 04/Dayton Street intersection. 0 Locate most of the residential development in the southeast corner and southern part of the site in a village setting or well landscaped complex. Introduce a mix of uses that complement downtown and that provide optimal tax revenue and other benefits to the City and Port, including pedestrian oriented retail and a residential mix geared toward a range of incomes. Circulation, Traffic and Parking Provide vehicular access from Dayton Street approximately midway between SR104 and the railroad. Locate most of the parking near the western perimeter of the site, next to the railroad. Parking could be enclosed in an above ground structure designed to serve the entire site. 0 Keep interior streets narrow to slow traffic and put the emphasis on pedestrians. Provide for bicycle circulation with shared use trails, bike lanes and/or safe shared lanes on internal streets. Public Amenities Create a pedestrian entry plaza to Harbor Square that invites public use and provides a visual gateway to Edmonds Marsh from the intersection at SR104/Dayton Street. Thispublicentry point will serve as a key link to downtown Edmonds and also create a pedestrian focus such as a village green or public plaza in the center of Harbor Square that provides space for public activities such as concerts, performances, fairs or an outdoor market. Establish a pedestrian friendly esplanade with compatible adjacent activities and building facades that extends from the public plaza at the corner of SR 1 04/Dayton Street across Harbor Square to Edmonds Marsh.. Create active sidewalk/pedestrian areas with retail spaces that open onto the Dayton Street W sidewalk. Small scale pedestrian spaces should be integrated between the development and the streetscape. New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan 5 Connect pedestrian walkways to linkages around Edmonds Marsh and to City-wide bike and pedestrian routes. Orient development in a manner that connects Harbor Square to downtown and the waterfront. 0 Provide direct pedestrian access to Edmonds Marsh from SR104. Provide a civic/cultural/view point/interpretive element within the development as a public benefit. Include bicycle connections and facilities (e.g.: storage racks) in circulation and open space planning. with a Village scale Flexible (retail/residential) space on the ground floor Visual connection from Dayton/SR1 04 comer through the site to the marsh Y--- Internal site connection to the marsh trail as well as the city wide trail system Pedestrian oriented central esplanade with Low Impact Development (LID) elements such as pervious pavement, rain gardens, etc. isite residents and Edmonds as a whole Pedestrian friendly esplanade extending from public plaza at comer of SR104IDayton Street across Harbor Square to Edmonds Marsh Sustainability Edmond's Comprehensive Plan includes a Community Sustainability Element with goals and poli- cies to increase the city's sustainability based on three principles: flexibilityto adapt to changing conditions, a holistic approach that integrates multiple actions to address the broad range of issues and a long term perspective that extends beyond the typical 20 year GMA time frame. Among the most relevant of this section's policies are: (See pages 19 through 26 in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan) New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan 6 A.3 Integrate land use plans and implementation tools with transportation, housing, cultural and recreational, and economic development planning so as to form a cohesive and mutually -supporting whole. BA Undertake a multi -modal approach to transportation planning that promotes an integrated system of auto, transit, biking, walking and other forms of transportation designed to effectively support mobility and access. BA When undertaking transportation planning and service decisions, evaluate and encourage land use patterns and policies that support a sustainable transportation system. D.3 Explore and employ alternative systems and techniques, such as life -cycle cost analysis, designed to maximize investments andlor reduce ongoing maintenance and facilities costs. E4 Land use and regulatory schemes should be designed to encourage and support the ability of local residents to work, shop, and obtain services locally F2 Recreational opportunities and programming should be integrated holistically into the City's infrastructure and planning process G. 1 Land use and housing programs should be designed to provide for existing housing needs while providing flexibility to adapt to evolving housing needs and choices. G.2 Housing should be viewed as a community resource, providing opportunities for residents to choose to stay in the community as their needs and resources evolve and change over time. The Harbor Square Master Plan responds to these policies in several ways. The multi -functional uses proposed for the site and the connections to downtown and the waterfront called for in Master Plan's Planning Principles reflect the objectives of policies A.3 and EA. Proximity and connections to bus, rail and ferry service respond to the transportation policies, especially B.1 and BA The Master Plan provisions directly below include an emphasis on green building and green infrastructure solu- tions as called for in Policy D.3 and the integrated pedestrian and bicycle scheme and supporting principles as well as provision for the athletic club and the marsh boardwalk address Policy F.2's call for integrated recreational opportunities. Finally, the Master Plan encourages a residential type and setting unique in Edmonds. Below are additional provisions to Edmonds' sustainability objec- tives. Incorporate into individual buildings and the overall site redevelopment both low energy and low water consumption techniques, as well as other strategies to minimize carbon footprint. Employ alternative systems and techniques, such as life -cycle cost analysis, designed to maximize investments and/or reduce ongoing maintenance and facilities costs Provide improved natural vegetated buffers and building setbacks to protect and enhance Edmonds Marsh. New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan Incorporate low impact development (LID) elements, such as pervious pavements and rain gardens to reduce undesirable run-off. 0 Contribute to day -lighting Willow Creek and improving the site's ecological value. ';--Landscape buffer between the idewalk and traffic Spaces for pe� astrian activity and gatherings and retail spaces opening onto the sidewalk Dayton Street sidewalk character Physical Design Criteria In order to direct the development of Harbor Square in an orderly manner to create a unified and attractive complex, the Port of Edmonds will establish design standards or guidelines that direct the design of individual buildings and spaces. The standards or guidelines will be used along with other zoning code and municipal code regulations to review projects within Harbor Square. The criteria are intended to be consistent with and implement the following goals and policies in Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Downtown Waterfront Activity Center element: New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan 8 E 14. Encourage opportunities for new development and redevelopment which reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these resources. These historic structures are a key component of the small town character of Edmonds and its economic viability. Height limits that reinforce and require pedestrian -scale development are an important part of this quality of life, and should be implemented through zoning regulations and design guidelines. E 17 Provide pedestrian -oriented amenities for citizens and visitors throughout the downtown waterfront area, including such things as: • Weather protection, • Street trees and flower baskets, • Street furniture, • Public art and art integrated into private developments, • Pocket parks, • Signage and other way -finding devices, • Restrooms. 0 E 18. Strive for the elimination of overhead wires and poles whenever possible. a E 19. Coordinate new building design with old structure restoration and renovation. E20. Develop sign regulations that support the pedestrian character of downtown, encouraging signage to assist in locating businesses and public and cultural facilities while discouraging obtrusive and garish signage which detracts from downtown pedestrian and cultural amenities. E21. Provide lighting for streets and public areas that is designed to promote comfort, security, and aesthetic beauty. E22. Building design should discourage automobile access and curb cuts that interfere with pedestrian activity and break up the streetscape. Encourage the use of alley entrances and courtyards to beautify the back alleys in the commercial and mixed use areas in the downtown area. The criteria described below present the general objectives and parameters that the standards or guidelines will implement. The physical design criteria for Harbor Square are necessarily general in nature because a specific lay -out for the complex will depend on development considerations and opportunities at the time. As noted above, they are intended to provide general guidance rather than serve as immutable standards. See site development objectives the Uses and Site Planning, Circulation and Traffic, and Public amenities sections. Height and Bulk Buildings should be no higher than 55' above grade except for 1) roof -top equipment and other appurtenances that are not visible from ground level and do not block significant views, and 2) special architectural features such as a tower, sculpture, etc. New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan All structures above 35' in height should not diminish the "human scale" experience of pedestrians on Dayton Street or decrease sunlight on the street. To that end, all buildings over 35'should be set back at least 1' horizontally away from Dayton Street for every 1' in height above 35' above grade. (This results in n significant additional sun shading or perception of a taller building by a pedestrian on Dayton.) The schematic section below illustrates these relationships. Buildings modulated and enhanced with landscaping to provide pleasant pedestrian promenade from 104th/Dayton 1-- _6 I -A enhancements and boardwalk per Edmonds SMP Buildings along All portions of buildings Dayton Avenue no (above 35'tall) set back taller than 4 from Dayton St. stories sidewalk at least one foot horizontally for every one foot in height above 367 I I Dayton Pedestrian oriented St. commercial activities on ground floor along Dayton St. SCHEMATIC SECTION THROUGH HARBOR SQUARE LOOKING WEST Illustrating basic building height and setback requirements Furthermore, the "average building height" of all buildings on the Harbor Square site, taken as a whole shall not exceed 45'. The means of calculating "average building height" shall be as stated in the notes at the end of this Master Plan. Setbacks and Ecological Enhancements along Edmonds Marsh All development within shoreline jurisdiction is subject to the provisions of Edmonds Shoreline Master Program (SMP). Therefore, new buildings and development, including clearing, grading parking areas, etc. will comply with the SMP. Additionally, the Port is committed to improving the ecological health of the marsh and will ensure that new development along the marsh will increase ecological functions. Envisioned improvements include: on -site storm water improvements per the City's Storm Water Management regulations (which will improve water quality), vegetation plantings (buffers), and a nature viewing boardwalk. I Small Scale Buildings All buildings should employ horizontal and vertical articulation and other architectural methods to maintain the small scale of Downtown Edmonds. Articulation means placing emphasis on architectural elements such as windows, balconies, faqade modulation, rooflines, etc to visually break down the fagade of a building into smaller pieces. Modulation is the stepping back or projecting forward of portions of a building fagade as a means of breaking up the building's apparent bulk. New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan 10 In general, the articulation should be designed to reduce the scale of buildings so that the horizontal module is no greater than 60' in width. These preliminary dimensional provisions are intended to respond to Downtown Edmonds' historic 60' lot pattern and traditional architecture. Buildings over 35' in height should be horizontally articulated with upper story setbacks, different materials or window patterns on different stories, balconies, canopies or other means. Street Orientation a Dayton Street Frontage The ground floor of buildings fronting on Dayton Street should feature "pedestrian oriented facades" and "pedestrian oriented uses". A "pedestrian oriented fagade" is one with transparent windows or window displays along most of the fagade front, pedestrian weather protection, signs oriented to the pedestrian rather than to the automobile passenger, a prominent building entry and other amenities such as building details, lighting, street furniture, etc. A "pedestrian oriented use" is a use that emphasizes human activity on the street such as retail shops, eating and drinking establishments, personal services and service oriented offices, etc. Buildings fronting on Dayton Street should either front directly on the street or be separated by a pedestrian oriented space such as a plaza, garden, outdoor seating area, etc. The sidewalk should be at least 15'wide. SR 104 Frontage The site frontage along SR 104 should feature either pedestrian oriented facades or attractive landscaping sufficient to screen the majority of building facades and all parking areas. There should be a pedestrian path along the entire SR 104 frontage. If WSDOT is amenable, the Port should enter into an agreement with WSDOT to improve the SR 104 ROW on the west side of the roadway to provide a much better streetscape, development edge and entry into downtown. Improvements should include street trees, landscaping, and if appropriate, a shared use (bike/pedestrian) trail. Architectural Character Provide for a well landscaped, Northwest oriented, small-town development character. Site Design and Landscaping Use green space that relates to and complements the adjacent uses. Use landscaping to create buffers between sidewalks and adjacent roadways. Notes: Average Building Height" shall be calculated by: 1. First, multiplying the foot print of each building on the Harbor Square site (as defined in the Harbor Square Master Plan) times the height (as defined in Edmonds Zoning Code) of the New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan 11 respective building. (See conditions below for buildings with multiple heights) This calcu- lation will yield the volume for each building. 2. Then, adding together the products calculated in step 1 (building volumes) and dividing that sum by the sum of all building footprints on the Harbor Square site. Provided that: * Existing and proposed buildings will be included in the calculations Where the height of a building varies from portion to another (e.g.: one wing of a building is 3 stories in height and another wing is 5 stories high.) then the building volume (height x foot- print) of each building portion shall be calculated separately. The height of buildings with pitched roofs shall be calculated as the average of the height of the ridge and the lower eave. For phased development where a portion of the site is developed, the maximum average building height for an early phase may exceed 45'if the average height of all buildings on site is less than 45'for all subsequent phases. New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master Plan 12 �f , . ........ Serving Brier, Edmonds -3NOHOMISH CO. I n FIREf Mountlake Terracea / d .tJ'j the Town of Woodwa' DISTiilti7 www-FireDistrict1lorg LOCATIONf' 336 Admiral Way BUSINESS NAME: Port Of Edmonds Office MAILING 336 Admiral Wy ADDRESS: Edmonds BUSINESS OWNER: Port Of Edmonds EMERGENC�- 1 1 McChesney, Bob KEY ACCESS-2: Kempf, Maria PERSON CONTACTED: '/ I ur", NAME OF INSPECTOR: L\,Pjz,,.p FIRE -Fliq c(IM SYSTEMS: 12425 Meridian Ave S E-krett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 Fax (425) 551-1272 PHONE: 4257740549 98020 HOME PHONE: 425774-0549 HOMEPHONE: 2067944259 HOMEPHONE: 2067137736 FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT 0 EDMONDS OBRIER OWOODWAY 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 0 UNINCORPORATED. FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT**' 366 17 A SCHEDULED DATE DUE 1' 08/01112 UFIR � 591 8201 ACTIVE CURRENT CITY YES NO BUSINESS 0 oil LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE -71t FEJ02� ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS L 2 0)(:b nA 14 J,S 601 UYR,14 / w/2 6?chln 2 F-CO I JI 3 ju, va n /L t'4_( Pzwe� -V 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTED TO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR, INSPECTOR- INSPECTOR: 2 3 DATE: DATE: DATE: VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 1 5 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 CODE 5 2 6 2 6 DATE: SECTION: RETURN RECEIPT 6 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED DISPOSITION: 4 18 4 18 DATE: 7 LETTER NEEDED E] YES El NO LETTER NEEDED [] YES El NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR MATERIALS OR PROCESSES January 3, 2012 Please verify and correct the following information: Name of Company (DBA): Port Of Edmonds Services Edmonds Location : 336 Admiral Way In conformity with the -terms -of-the.International- Fire Code, application is hereby made to store use Welding operation; storage and use of Class 1, 11, and or maintain the following III flammable and/or combustible liquids. activity, storage or pro- cesses: c/o Port of Edmonds Services Mailing Address: 336 Admiral Wy Edmonds, WA 98020 EFD LIFIR #: 78259108B201 (for office use) Your Signature Your Name (print) Your Title Please make corrections, attach $40 payable to the City of Edmonds and mail to: Fire Marshal Department of Fire Prevention 121-5 th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Rec'd 0/( Z_ Check# 0 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR MATERIALS OR PROCESSES January 24, 2011 Please verify and correct the following information: Name of Company; DBA Port Of Edmonds Services Edmonds Location 336 Admiral Way In conformity with the terms of Welding operation; storage and use of Class 1, 11, and III the International Fire Code, flammable and/or combustible liquids. application is hereby made to store, use or maintain the following activity, storage or processes: Mailing Address: Port of Edmonds Services 336 Admiral Wy Edmonds WA 98020 EFD UFIR #: 7825910813201 (for office use) Your Signature Your Name (print) —P,&At P prr Your Title Please make corrections and mail to: Fire Marshal Department of Fire Prevention 121-5 th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 6" P"rl � CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT January 1, 2011 782-5911-0813-2011 December 31, 2011 Date of Issue UFIR Number Date of Expiration This PERMIT is issued to: I Port Of Edmonds Services I located at: 1336 Admiral Way I Edmonds, WA I To engage in the business, occupation or process of: I I And shall constitute permission to maintain, store, use or handle materials or to conduct process which produce conditions hazardous to life or property or to install equipment used in connection with such activities as follows: Welding operation; storage and use of Class 1, 11, and III flammable and/or combustible liquids. I Allowed Occupant Load: I -- I Pursuant to the provisions of the International Fire Code, any violation of the Code may be grounds for the revocation of this PERMIT. This permit does not take the place of any license required by law and is not transferable. Any change in the use or occupancy of premises shall require a new permit. Fire Karshal Department of Fire Orevention This Permit Must Be Posted At All Times in The Premises Identified Above City of Edmonds Community Development Code 19.25.020 3013 3i&AVE- NORTH StAl.-ME �WA FM DEPARTMENT 98109 Confidence les4ng. (800) - 223, FIRE, (�06) 24-1769 FAX AAA RRE COM FIRE ALARM Address City: Occ'upiedas: INVOICE # ACCOUNT # �09CQ /a DATE 3 -to 20 k� Zip Code C, ?6D_0 Building Owner: Ph.# Address: S-1-1 "e— - City: Zip Code: C� Date of Inspection: 0 -ZC)q _ Type of Inspection: Quarterly C-An—nuiar—) Acceptance . Other Tester's Name (PLEASE PRINT) SFD Certification # R-(.)(�,w4z�, Control Panel L?o �)- kt� 6 0 1 S0,VC OM Model # No. of Initiating Circuits No. of Signal Circuits Battery Voltage Volts Charge Circuit Voltage Volts Battery Voltage Under Full Load _1_____,V_olts (signals operating) 120 o . 1-\ - (:I- , I . Trouble Signal With A/C Power Off Yes No N/A 2. System Operates Satisfactorily on Standby Power Yes No N/A 3. All auxiliary equipment operates4=elevatars, fans, dampers) Yes No N/A 4. All Signals Operate On AC Power 5. Have All Alarm Notification Yes No Appliances been checked for proper operation Yes No 6. All Circuits Checked For Electrical Supervision Yes No N/A 7. Control panel checks made per manufacturer's instructions Yes No N/A 8. Central station or remote connection Yes No N/A Name of monitoring company 9. Key to panel available Yes No N/A X_- TYPE OF EQUIPMENT # OF UNITS TESTED SATISFACTORY # OF UNITS IN BLDG YES NO N/A BELLS, HORNS, CHIMES VOICE ALARM SPEAKERS VISUAL ALARM DEVICES TROUBLE INDICATORS SUPER SWITCHES (AUTO SPR.) SMOKE DETECTORS(S) HEAT DETECTOR(S) MANUAL PULL STATIONS VENTILATION CONTROLS OPERATE CENTRAL STATION ANNUNCIATORS ELEVATOR CALL DOWN FIRE DAMPER/SMOKE DAMPERS PHONE JACKS AUTO, DOOR UNLOCKS (FAIL SAFE) AUTO, DOOR RELEASE OTHER PROBLEMS FOUND: CORRECTIONS MADE: Date corrected By THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN PROPERLY TESTED AND INSPECTED FOR RELIABILITY TO COVER THE ITEMS LISTED IN THIS REPORT - SIGNATURE OF TESTER ELECTRICAL LICENSE # 3 e� X CITY -OF EDMONDS 121.5TH AVENUE N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (425) 771-0215 FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY LOCATION: 336 Admiral Way BUSINESS NAME: Port Of Edmonds Office PHONE: 4257740549 MAILING 336 Admiral Wy FREQUENCY S1A`rION & SHIFT 2 1 17 C SCHEDULED DATE DUE 11- 08/01/10 UFIR I� 591 8201 ADDRESS: \1 Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: Port Of Edmonds HOME PHONE: 4257740549 AC*nVE EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: 75 q - -0y 5 KEY ACCESS-2: Kempf, Maria HOMEPHONE: 2067137736 PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: wmj< �-G N -_ FIRE FE,��J 0;;� SYSTEMS: ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 1 7 7 ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE 0 VIOLATION CODE 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 'Ist REANSPEPTION DATEDUE� 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: I v/ PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 NS- 1 5 VIOLATIONS 5 PRE-CITAIION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 7 4 8 4 18 1 DATE: DISPOSITION: LETTER NEEDED 0 YES C] NO LETTER NEEDED 0 YE.S NO -FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY CITY OF EDMONDS 121,5TH AVENUE N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (425) 771-0215 FIRE DEPARTMENT 4�' t LOCATION: 336 Admiral Way BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Yacht Sales MAILING 300 Admiral Wy #A' A FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY PHONE: 4257748878 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: Linnane Group Corp. HOMEPHONE: 4257743259 EMERGENCY-1: Linnane, Ronne HOME PHONE: 42-57743259 KEY ACCESS-2: Linnane, Scoff HOMEPHONE: 2067132035 FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT 365 17 C SCHEDULED 11' 08/01/10 DATE DUE UFIR 1, 576 8201 ACTIVE PERSON CONTACTED: IL 0 (-1 rj Ir'7 INITIAL INS ECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: a-.o FIRE SYSTEMS: FE _Lj_t 0 ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 1 V4')Ty� tj b, 1pw r4 0 ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE VIOLATION CODE 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION PATE DUE: EX'TENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: I INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE� DATE. DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 7 4 .18 4 8 DATE: DISPOSITION: 8 LETTER NEEDED [] YES NO LETTER NEEDED [] YES NO FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY e- 1:5-(L-C7 March 26, 2010 .'Date of Issue N/A - LIFIR Number_,::,",. This PERMITJs issued to: I Mr. Kyusuk Kim CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMIT April 26, 2010 Date of Expiration Ilocatedat. 1336 Admiral Way Port of Edmodds R&0airYardjF. I Edmonds, WA To enqa-qe in the business, occupation or process of:�' I HOT WORK OPERATIONS And shall constitute permission to maintain, store, use or handle materials or to conduct process which . .,produce conditions hazardous to life or property or to install equipment used in connection with such activities as follows: 1) Work shall comply with IFC Chapter 26 Welding a ' nd other Hot Work (attached) 2) Fire Extinguisher sized 2A:20B:C to be onsitelwithin 30' of hot work. 3) Fire Watch Required. 4) Observe (attached) Gen'l and Fire Safety Requirements (Secs. 2603 & 2604). Allowed Occupant Load: N Pursuant to the provisions of the International Fire Code, any violation of the Code may be grounds for the revocation of this PERMIT. Thi&permit does not take the place of any license required by law and is not transferable. Any change in the use or occu . pancy of premises shall require a new permit. This Permit Must Be Posted At All Times in The Premises Mentionec Above City of Edmonds Community Development Code 19.25.020 cd ry\ 6yos AAX Fire & Safpty, Inc 940ffe Fire Department 3 133r. -Ave, U Confidence Test Report _0 q a Se 'ttle, a 981.09 -9-86-386-t448 Confidence Testing Officer 206-284-1721 l000's� ,t6--6r5--M68 (fax) info@aaafire.com �--��ecl Tag Hotline FIRE ALARM SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) ..YELLOW 0 WHITE CONFIDENCETEST REPAIRS Occupancy Addres.s: UcA_,, Occupancy Name: �6 City, State, Zip C.'3C't_--10 Responsible Person First & Last Name: �Olo kfCCL!jA_A_ Phone Number: Lt -2C-- -7 U Responsible Person Address, City, State, Zip: Responsible Party E—Mail Address Date of Inspection: Inspection Quarterly M (High-rise Only) Frequency[Type: Annual Testers Name (Please Print): a4'-c k SFID Certification Number: SCP- Central station monitoring? Yes 171 No 17 Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes D..' Nop Company Name: System Make: S- F-0 �-V_ 4-* System Model: System Location q�.O'o" Identification Number: FoLIND.: (if z,,(,Idi,;or.al roorr i'z needed, please e CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (if additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: SCP - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Seattle Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for cor'rective action. Signature of Tester: Phone# 2o'L J S Testing Agency: AAA Fire & Safety, Inc rd Mailing Address: 3013 3 , Ave N Seattle, Wa 98109 Building Representative (signature) _ M Al- 0+___ The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Seattle Fire Depar-tment Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. Alarm System Functionality.. 1. Trouble signal with AC power off? Yes 173 No 0 2., Systern'operates p. pc ro �rl� on battery backup?" Y, Yes. 11. .No 173 31. ...Battery voltage (no load) 'o Its Battery vo voltageffull load) V, lts.(,S.ign Is.opera6'n") g 5. Charge circuit voltage volts v System.ope* rates properly on standby power? Yes, 11, NOIM'.:� 7. All signals operate on AC power? Ye! N_ ... 1 1. ... 013 .8. .Num.berof�initiating-circuits .9....NuTber of signal circuits Qoes�:alarm.:systerli:�meet�!audibility. stzindards:as accepiej�.' s Ye. N 6, 11. All circuits checked for electrical sUpe—rLabon? Yes L No 13 All.-auxiliziry equipment opera EEe vator� S( levato, a.h.s., clannPers)? N/A IT. Y s e No 13. Ventilation controls operate? N/A, Yes 173 : No. 14. Key to panel. available? Ye No, 15. Operating instructions at panel? I I Yes 13 No 173 'i. 6.. Trolubleirid.icat or,s func tion;properly'?, Yes: C] No 17. Remote Annunciator Panels function properly? N/A Yes 11 No .18. Elevato'r" Call Down functions properly? No- 19. Test record posted at panel? Yes No 20.;:G neral...alarm,.auto matic�.time dela y: (min 0 es 21. Was a signal received at the Central Sta tion monito ring company? 22.. Other Devices (8piec'ify) N/A Yes 173 No Yes Total Total Number Number of Units in Units SYstem Devices Building Tested Bells, �Horns Chimes Test Results Acceptable ..23. 24. Voice Speakers (Voice Clarity) M A N/A rl e . 25�. Smoke Detectors J :N A h Yes 171 Yes.. No 0 26. Heat Detectors N/A Yes M No,Q No 0 27.1 ors N/A.. Yes 0 N o* 28. Sprinkler Flow Switches N/A f?. Yes 13 No 11 21. Sorinkier Su, rv1-so�:y.Swkch'es:_.._ pe "... � I. — .. : .:z N/A 171, Yes [3 No 30. Visual Alarm Devic[les . N/A I? Yes 11 No C3 31. Manu al'Pull Stations::'. N/A Yes 0: No 32. Annunciator(s) N/A Yes 173 No 17111 33. Beam Detectors N/A Yes 13 No 0 34. Automatic Door Unlocks N N/A A Yes 0 No C1 �5. Automatic Door Release N N/A A Yes 173 No 71 36. Fire Dampers, every 4 yrs. N N/A Yes 73 No 171 Total Number of Total Number Communication Equipment Units in Building Units Tested 37.. Phone Sets Test Results Acceptable 38. Phone Jacks N/A 9� Yes 0 No C3 39. Call -in Signal N/A 19 Yes 13 Yes 13 No No �4_q :�ire Alarm Svstems 3 RT OF E D M 0 N D S 336 Admiral Way - Edmonds, WA 98020-7214 - (425) 774-0549 . (425) 774-7837 fAX DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal: Port of Edmonds is proposing replacement of an existing access ramp that provides access from a timber boardwalk area to floating boat docks M and N for their operations on Port property. The proposed project would be completed at the existing Port of Edmonds Marina. The project area is located in the SE quarter of Section 23 of Township 27. Range 03.East. Proponent: Port of Edmonds Location of Proposal: Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, Washington 98020 Section 23 Township 27N Range 03E Lead Agency: Port of Edmonds The lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist. The DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by July 1, 2008. Responsible official: Mr. Christopher W. Keuss CNBI Position/Title: Executive Director Phone: 425 774-0549 Address: Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Dat4 Signat XX You may appeal this determination to Chris Keu ' ss, Executive Director, at 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit fonn no later than July 1, 2008. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Chris Keuss to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on June 10, 2008, at the Port of Edmonds Administration office, Edmonds Public Library, and the Edmonds Post Office. Y_X Distributed to "Checked Agencies" along with a copy of the Environmental Checklist XX Environmental Review Section XX DNR SEPA Center Department of Ecology P 0 Box 47015 P 0 Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX CONIC AST XX Seattle Dist. US Army Corps of Outside. Plant Engineer, North Region Engineers 1525 75t' St SW #200 P 0 Box C-3755 Everett, WA 98203 Seattle, WA 98124 XX Department of Fish & Wildlife Y_X Town of Woodway 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard Attn: Clerk -Treasurer Mill Creek, WA 98012 23920 113 Ih Place West Woodway, WA 98020 XX Washington State Dept of Transportation XX City of Edmonds Attn Ramin Pazooki 121-5 Ih Avenue North SnoKing Developer Services MS221 Edmonds, WA 98020 15700 Dayton Ave North P 0 Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 XX Parks and Recreation Commission XX National Marine Fisheries Box 42650 Service Olympia, WA 98504-0917 Northwest Regional Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98115-0070 XX Puget Sound Water Quality Authority P 0 Box 40900 Olympia, WA 98504-0900 Attachments TO BE CONTLETED BY APPUCANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY .A.BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Port ofEdmonds Dock Ramp Replacement 2. Name of applicant: Port ofEdmonds 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Chris Keuss, Executive Director Port ofEdmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Email.-ckeussAvortotedmonds. o Phone:(425)774-0549 Fax:(425)774-7837 4. Date checklist prepared: May 23, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: Port ofEdmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Because ofhigh dock usage in summer, the proposedproject probably will not begin until August or September 2008. Construction is expected to last approximately 3 weeks. 7. Do you have any plans for fliture additions, expansion, or fiu-ther activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Nofuture additions or expansions are currently anticipated. 8. Lag any enviromnental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A JARPA applicationform will be completed and submitted to the USArmy Corps ofEngineers (Corps) and the Washington Department offish'and Wildlife (WDFFT9 for receipt of necessary authorization. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Only those applications covered in question 8 above. 10. List any government approvals or pem3its that will be needed for your proposaL if Imown. 2 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT It is anticipated that a Hydraulic ProjectApproval (HPA)ftom the TPDFW and a general authorizationfrom the Coips will be required before construction can commence. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to -repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form ZD to include additional specific information on project description.) Theproposed activity is limited to the replacement ofan existing access ramp thatprovides accessfrom a timber boardwalk area tofloating boat docky M and N located in the southern portion of the marina. Due to the length of the existing- ramp and tidalfluctuations, the existing ramp is too steepfor safe pedestrian use. The existing 40-foot steel and treated timber access ramp would be replaced with a 52-footprefabricated aluminum ramp with plastic treads. ne access ramp terminates at afloat. To support the additional weight ofthe longer ramp, additionalflotationfor thefloat may be necessary, which would beprovided by the installation ofplastic-encasedpolysty-rene. Lastly, the existing locking access gate which prevents the public omusingth c ess fir ,, e a c ramp would be repositioned to align with the ramp's new location. Please see the attached drawingsfor details of the proposed access ramp replacement. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. VvUle you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposedproject would be completed at the existing Port ofEdmonds Marina. ne marina is located at 336 Admiral Way in Edmonds, Washington. ne project area is located in the SE quarter ofSection 23 of Township 2 7, Range 03 East Please see the attached location mapforfurther details of the project area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I.Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, The project site is entirely built out and essentiallyflat exceptfor the riprap armored slopes underneath the timber boardwalk. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The riprap slopes underneath the timber boardwalk are approximately 45 degrees. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE CONPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What- general types of soils are found on.the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The entireproject would be completed within areas that are currentlyfully developed as pavedparking areas, timber�framed boardwalk, and timber- fi-athed boat docla. Theref6re, no work would be completed on or adjacent to native soils. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No surface indications or erosion were evident during the site visit on April 22,2008. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No grading orfilling, will be required to complete theproposedproj' ct. e f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Because no clearing or earth disturbance will be required to complete the project, no erosion could resultfrom clearing or construction. a About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? t, The project would not result in a net increase in impervious surtaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Installing the new access ramp will require removing, portions of the existing boardwalk to add the longer replacement gangway. In order to prevent treated woodfibersfrom entering waterways, a particle collection tarp will be installed below the boardwalk before cutting or drilling ofthe boardwalk begin. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the 0 project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. A small amount of emissions will resultfrom the use ofa small crane to place the newgangway. No odors, dust, or other noxious air emissions are expected to resultfront the project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT No emissions are expected,- therefore, no measures are required. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, 0 wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state wbat stream or river it flows into. Yes, the marina is located in the Puget Sound. To prevent damage to moored boats within the marina, the marina is surrounded by a breakwater constructed of large riprap and boulders. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The proposed access ramp project will require over -water work. This work will be limited to removing the existing access ramp, modifying the -existing timber boardwalk, andplacing the new prefabricated access ramp. Tide levels will determine the extent Of actual overwater work; during low tide, the boardwalk andportions of the access ramp are not over water. Please see the enclosedplans and photosfor more detail. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Nofilling, or dredging will be required. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. C, No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yhe project is directly adjacent to Puget Sound, a tidal waterbody. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No discharge of waste materials is expected. BA'Ips will be employed during construction to prevent wastefrom entering surface waters. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if Imown. 1Vo groundwater will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to groundwater. TO BE CONIPLETED BY APPLICANT 2) Describe waste material that will be discharcled into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served,(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm. water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so', describe. Yhe.proposedproject will not result in an increase in impervious surface or runofffrom precipitation.. Although the new access ramp will be 12 feet longer than the existing, ramp, the tread of the new access ramp is more open and will represent less impervious surface. No collection or treatment ofstormwater will be requiredfor the project. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. A tarp or other suitable material will be installed underneath the boardwalk to capture any wood debris or other material that would otherwisefall into the marina waters. No debris is expected to enter suiface or groundwaters. . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See above. - 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ____,evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs asture crop or gram Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulhush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other .other types of vegetation: Vegetation is limited to containerized landscaping b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. Little native -vegetation exists within theproject area. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT None. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: haw heron, gle, songbirds, other: various shorebirds k(� marnmals: dee�r,ear. elk, beaver, other: harbor seal, California sea hon, stellar sea lionNe#beq-o1Gpknt seal fish: bass, salmon, rout,%�� ellfish �ther: Dungeness crab, common E * nl��e)benthic vertebrates b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. According to WDFWpriority habitat and species maps, thefollowing - federally listed T and E species are known to utilize marine waters in the immediate vicinity of the project area: coho salmon. In addition, resident cutthroat trout, afederal species ofconcern, is known to use theproject area. According to local WDFW biologists, salmonids are known to use marina waters during annual migration. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is listed in the NOAA seabird colony database which documents known locationsfor a variety ofseabirds. Therefore, it is a reasonable assumption that the project area is used during annual seabird migration. Due to the nature of the project, no changes to the suitability of the sitefor usage by avian wildlife is expected. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Yheproposedproject is not expected to increase impacts or degrade habitat over existing conditions. As such, no preservation or enhancementfeatures will resultfrom the project. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The proposedproject is not expected to result in a net increase in energv consumption as it is a passive improvement that is not lit, heated, or otherwise uses enerV. b, Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. The proposedproject will not result in the shading ofareas potentially suitablefor the installation ofsolarpanels. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Mone, not applicable. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 7 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 7. Envirorumental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic 0 chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Low volumes of traffic noise are present within the project area. Noise is not qxpected to impact the proposedproject. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or. a Iong-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise generatedfr07n the construction of the project will be limited to common construction noise including drilling hammering, sawing, etc. In addition, thegangways will be removed and installed by a small crane. Construction will be limited to the normal working hours of 7:00am to 5:00pm. Due to the lack ofresidential developments in the area, noise conflicts are not anticipated. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be limited to normal accepted working, hours only. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Yhe shoreline is currently being used as a marina. Adjacentproperties include office buildings, a restaurant, parking areas, and boat storage facilities. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures within the project site include a 2-story Office building that house the Port ofEdnionds offices, a wooden boardwalk suspended above EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY . 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY the riprap-armored shoreline of the marina, gangways leading down to thefloating docks, and severalfloating docks. C, d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? A smallportion of the existing boardwalk will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CW- Commercial waterfi-ont f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? City ofEdmonds Master Plan.Area Cr. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of 0 the site? Urban Mixed Use I h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yhe open waters of the site would be considered environmentally sensitive due to the presence ofmarine life andjederally listed ESA species during particular times of the year. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed proj ect? Not applicable. j Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k- Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. Project will not result in a change in land use. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11. Liaht and glare b a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? M&O, c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ]Vone. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Recreation activities in the immediate vicinity include boating and other aquatic recreation walking picnicking, and dining. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, the project will not displace any existing recreational uses but instead will increase safe access to existinggfloatingr docks. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No impacts areforeseen. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 0 None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 10 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT None. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The marinafacilities are accessedfromAdmiral Way. The proposed access ramp is accessed via the public boardwalk extending along the shoreline. Access to the ramp andfloating,, docks is limited to marina members who have a key to the access gate. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to.the nearest,transit stop? Bus stops are located within 1, 000 yards of the marina. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many C, would the project eliminate? None. ' d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oo water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No increase in vehicle trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, oth6r)? If so, generally describe. NO. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer are all available at the marinafacility. I I TO BE CONPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Describe the utilities that are proposed forthe project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lea(ragency is relying on them to make its decision. �z t, Signature: Date: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12 LEGAL DESCRIPTION .... BELLINGHAM P PU SC UGET SOUND REGION .......... .......... ....... EVERETT PROJECT LOCATION MMONDS TACOMA VICINITY MA OLYMPIA NOT TO SCALE PURPOSE: Replace Access Ramp to Moorage Floats M and N with .a longer, less steep ramp. DATUM: MLLW ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: 1) ESC Associates 2� Union Oil Co. 3 Margaret B. Vorwick Trust THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF TIDELANDS ADJOINING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 WITH THE WEST MARGIN OF ADMIRAL WAY, THENCE N14D 48' 00"E ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF DAYTON STREET, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE INNER HARBOR LINE; THENCE S44D 58' 30"W ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH SECTION LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EDMONDS (LAT 47*42'N, LONG TIDAL INFORMATION MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER (MHHW) MEAN HIGH WATER (MHW) MEAN LOWER LOW WATER �MLLW) f EXTREME LOW WATER (ELW 122*23'W) +10.9 +10.0 0.0 —4.5 LOCATION PLAN Proposed Replacement of Access NOT TO SCALE lRamp to Floats M and N IN: Puget Sound AT: Port of Edmonds PORT OF EDMONDS COUNTY: Snohomish 336 ADMIRAL WAY APPLICATION BY: Port of Edmonds EDMONDS, WA 98020 SHEET: 1 of 5 DATE:04/28/08 �� 4 PROJECT AREA V, ze EELGRASS BEDS PER PENTEC ENVIROMENTAL SURVEY JULY 2001 7� 1? 45, Ilk rj 200 FT SHOR ELINE BOUNDARY PORT OF EDMONDS ADMINISTRATION BLDG 0 PURPOSE: Replace Access Ramp NORTH MARINA PLAN Proposed Replacement of Access to Moorage Floats M and N with Ramp to Floats M and N. a longer, less steep ramp. 100 0 100 200 DATUM: MLLW Scale feet IN: Puget Sound ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: - AT: Port of Edmonds 1) ESC Associates PORT OF EDMONDS COUNTY: Snohomish 2� Union Oil Co. 336 ADMIRAL WAY APPLICATION BY: Port of Edmonds 3 Margaret B. Vorwick Trust EDMONDS, WA 980,20 SHEET: 2 of 5 DATE:04/28/08 A 5 LL - -LF- - - - 14 EXIST PILE L LOCATIONS EDGE OF BOARDWALK SUPPORT END OF RAMP BY INSTALLING KNEE BRACE TO PILE YAA REMOVE DECKING INSTALL RAILING TO MATCH EXIST DC'kArNk/C' D11 C' CAPS AND INSTALL NE W/GRATED 10 0 10 20 1"=10' I scale feet REMOVE EXIST FENCING AND GATE REMOVE EXIST 40' RAMP EXIST LANDING FLOAT ADD FLOATATION TO SUPPORT HEAVIER RAMP -.--EXIST TELE BOX POSTS q 52' RAMP DECKING A Hr� Ix EXIST FLOAT J EXIST F.D. STD PIPE!A PURPOSE: Replace Access Ramp PLAN Proposed Replacement of Access to Moorage Floats M and N with RAMP REPLACEMENT Ramp to Floats M and N a longer, less steep ramp. DATUM: MLLW IN: Puget Sound ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT: Port of Edmonds 1) ESC Associates PORT OF EDMONDS COUNTY: Snohomish 2� Union Oil Co. 336 ADMIRAL WAY APPLICATION BY: Port of Edmonds 3 Margaret B. Vorwick Trust EDMONDS, WA 98020 SHEET: 3 of 5 DATE: 04/28/08 RAIL AND DECKING TO BE REMOVED NEW RAMP TO BOARDWALK EL +16.79 BE'ATTACHED TOP OF WALL EXIST RAMP TO BE REMOVED x TOP OF WALL EL +15.85 H IGHEST OBSERVED TIDE, EL +12.91 MHHW +10.9 MTL +6.43 MLLW EL- 0.0 LTJ ELW —4.5 ADD POLYSTYRENE ENCASED FLOATATION AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT HEAVIER RAMP EXIST FLOAT 8 0 8 16 1/8"=V-0" scale feet PURPOSE: Replace Access Ramp ELEVATION Proposed Replacement of Access to Moorage Floats M and N with RAMP REPLACMENT Ramp to Floats M and N a longer', less steep ramp. DATUM: MLLW IN: Puget Sound ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT: Port of Edmonds 1) ESC Associates PORT OF EDMONDS COUNTY: Snohomish 2� Union Oil Co. 336 ADMIRAL WAY APPLICATION BY: Port of Edmonds 3 Margaret B. Vorwick Trust EDMONDS, WA 98020 SHEET: 4 of 5 DATE: 04/28/08 GHEST OBSERVED TIDE, EL +12.91 MHHW +10.9 MTL +6.43 MLLW EL 0.0 ELW —4.5 ADD POLYSTYRENE ENCASED FLOATATION AS NEEDED TO SUPPORT HEANVIER RAMP 8 0 8 16 scale feet PURPOSE: Replace Access Ramp SECTION Proposed Replacement of Access to Moorage Floats M and N with RAMP REPLACEMENT Ramp to Floats M and N a longer, less steep ramp. DATUM: MLLW IN: Puget Sound ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: PO . RT OF EDMONDS AT: Port of Edmonds 1) ESC Associates 336 ADMIRAL WAY COUNTY: Snohomish 2) Union Oil Co. EDMONDS, WA 98020 APPLICATION BY: Port of Edmonds 3) Margaret B. Vorwick Trust SHEET: 5 of 5 DATE: 04/28/08 Westfall, John From: Smith, Mike Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 7:19 AM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: RE: Standpipe Testing at the Port of Edmonds I can't remember if I already sent this out but all standpipes at the Port passed their 5 year test and are fully functional. Call with questions. Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: Smith, Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 3:23 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: RE: Standpipe Testing at the Port of Edmonds The leak at the FDC on E & F docks has been fixed and the standpipe is functional. Testing for the rest of the docks continues. FYI ----- Original Message ----- From: Smith, Mike Sent: . Monday, February 25, 2008 4:09 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Standpipe Testing at the Port of Edmonds All standpipes at the Port will have their 5 year hydrostatic testing done this week. At present the standpipe for E and F docks is OOS due to a leak found at the FDC. It should be operable by tomorrow. I will keep all posted on the progress of the testing. Please do not do any drills on the docks this week. Thanks "? 3 6C A -,Om I ---- -/ Westfall, John From: Smith, Mike Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:09 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Standpipe Testing at the Port of Edmonds All standpipes at the Port will have their 5 year hydrostatic testing done this week. At present the standpipe for E and F docks is OOS due to a leak found at the FDC. It should be operable by tomorrow. I will keep all posted on the progress of the testing. Please do not do any drills on the docks this week. Thanks Tomberg, Thomas -3; 3 C L._� From: Schmitt, Bob Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 10:10 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Boat Information Below are a few items for your review. Boat and Dock Security- There are two Supra Key boxes on the north gate post. The new box (on the left) has the key for the gate padlock and a second key for the deadbolt for the doors fore and aft of the boat cabin. The ignition keys are under the desk top inside the cabin. When entering the gate to go to the boat, please remember to shut the gate so it does not stick out along the boardwalk. The key box on the right was relocated here from the south side of the Port Operation's Office (located south of Anthony's). This box contains the port boat key, the master gate key (for all other docks), and a key to get into the dry storage padlocks. This relocation was approved by the Fire Marshal. The code for the two Supra Key boxes is USA. Fueling- There is a gas card located under the desk top in the cabin area. Before you can fuel the boat, you have to go through a 5-10 minute training session with one of the Port employees. Try to gather in large groups to receive the training so we do not take up too much of the employee's time training us. There is a contract that all of us must sign when we complete the training. Log Book- The log book is located below the desk top and should be filled out when ever you train or complete periodic maintenance on the boat. The log book should include the names of the personnel, the date and time of the visit, the activity you performed, and the time you completed your visit. Operations- Lt. Heryla is drafting a procedure for getting the boat under way. He should have this complete on September 17th. We'll use this guideline as our crews first introduction to the boat. Do not take the boat out unless you have one of the members that delivered the boat to Edmonds, in attendance, and only if they feel comfortable taking it out. For the Fire Department, these members include Lt. Heryla, Lt. Oftedahl, Lt. White. Punch List- There will be a note pad under the desk top of items we still have not completed. If you find something wrong or needs fixing, please write it on the note pad and email BC Schmitt and Dave Sittauer to inform us of the problem. If it is a major item, notify your BC and he'll determine the best course of action. If you have other suggestions, send them through your boat shift rep- Lt. Heryla, Lt. Oftedahl, and Lt. White. These member's will forward the ideas to BC Schmitt. Safety and PFDs- Unless I am misinterpreting the standard, you should not need to wear your PFDs if you are at dockside just familiarizing yourself with the boat. If you are preparing to take the boat out, put your PFD on and keep it on until you secure the boat. There are plenty of PFDs aboard the boat so you do not need to take them off your rig. Periodic Maintenance- We will be developing a weekly maintenance sheet for the boat. Bob Schmitt Battalion Chief, A -Shift 425-771-0261 ext. 1269 425-754-1828 cell Page I of I *�3 Westfall, John From: Roger Dudley [rdudley@triton-marine.com] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 7:43 AM To: Fire Dept Group Cc: Pam Lemcke; 'Robert Hymel'; 'Lindsay, Rich'; 'Chris Keuss'; 'Elmer Ozolin'; 'Rich Davis' Subject: cut cap and relocation of the fire main loop within the construction area edmonds waterfront To all concerned parties , Please find following notification that Triton Marine construction will perform the cut and cap work necessary to relocate and upsize the fire main as discussed at the weekly construction meeting of 5-11-05 . this work will start at 3:00 am on the morning of 5/17/05 this work will be completed by 6:30 am . The line will be re -energized at that time. If you have any questions in this matter or if you require additional coordination please contact me by e-mail or cal me at 425-712-1264.thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. Roger Dudley Triton Marine Const. 5/12/2005 ; P-0 R T OF I D M 0 N D S CONSTRUCTION UPDATE NOTICE EDMONDS WATERFRONT PROJECT Posted: March 14,2005 Project Schedule 0 Procurement Phase 0 Mobilization Phase • South WWTP Outfall Repair • Storm Dram' Outfall Replacement • North Seawall/Timber Bulkhead Replacement • Mid Marina Breakwater Repair Match 2 — August 24, 2005 March 1 - March 11, 2005 March 9 — June 9, 2005 City Project June 8 — July 29, 2005 City Project July 15 — October 31, 2005 Port Project July 15 — November 7, 2005 Port Project South Wastewater Treatment Plant Outfaff Repair Project Work - Next 2 to 3 Weeks • Install project signage • Setup traffic control devices/signage • Remove the Olympic Beach ramp slab. * Setup the dewatering area. • Install cathodic protection at the top of the ramp at the beach site. • Start vault excavation subject to issuance of the building permit. Construction fence/barrier with sound proofing will be installed separating the construction site from the Landing building — April. Project Impacts to the Public 0 Walkway along the beach will be impacted and the pedestrian walkway will be rerouted around the construction area. Portions of the beach area will be impacted. Construction area will be fenced off. Contact for this phase: Pam Lemcke, City of Edmonds - 425 771-0220 a I EDMONDS WATERFRONT PROJECT SCHEDULE. I. PROCUREMENT PHASE March 2, 2005 to August 24, 2005 11. MOBILIZATION PHASE March 2, 2005 to March 11, 2005 III. SOUTH WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OUTFALL REPAIR CITY OF EDMONDS March 9, 2005 to June 9, 2005 IV. STORM DRAIN OUTFALL REPLACEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS june'8, 2005 to July 29, 2005 V. NORTH SEAWALL/TIMBER BULKHEAD REPLACEMENT PORT OF EDMONDS July 15, 2005 to October 31, 2005 VI. MID MARINA BREAKWATER REPAIR PORT OF EDMONDS July 15, 2005 to November 7, 2005 Contact Person: City of Edmonds — Pam Lemcke — 425 771-0220 Port of Edmonds — Chris Keuss — 425 774-0549 Message Wesffall, John -- Pagelof2 From: Smith, Mike Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 9:13 AM To: Wesffall, John Subject: RE: Edmonds Waterfront Preconstruction Meeting Yes ----- Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:39 AM To: Smith, Mike Subject: FW: Edmonds Waterfront Preconstruction Meeting Importance: High Mike: I'm at the Fire Conference in Ocean Shores. Are you available Monday? John ----- Original Message ----- From: Gebert, David Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:18 PM To: 'mtrohimovich@cosmogrp.com'; Fiene, Don; Lemcke, Pam; Koho, Steve; Lindsay, Rich; Mcintosh, Brian; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike; Miller, Noel; Waite, Jim; Kammerer, Jim Subject: FW: Edmonds Waterfront Preconstruction Meeting Importance: High The Port is trying to schedule a preconstruction conference for the waterfront project for sometime the first week in February. I need to let the Port know what times that week will work best. For all of you City staff receiving this e-mail, I will check your outlook calendars on Monday and try to pick times that work best for us, so please make sure your outlook calendars are current if you wish to attend this preconstruction conference. Jim Waite, your outlook calendar looks like you are booked almost solid that entire week, so I'll do the best I can, and if you are not able to make it, feel free to send a rep. Merita, can you please let me know by Monday what times that week work for you. Thanks, Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Bev Borth [mailto:BBORTH@PORTOFEDMONDS.ORG] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 1:54 PM To: jarcher@triton-marine.com; 'Gebert, David'; 'Elmer Ozolin'; 7ina Drennan' Subject: Edmonds Waterfront Preconstruction Meeting Importance: High I have been tasked with setting up the Edmonds Waterfront Preconstruction meeting the first week of February. As youkhow, there will be a lot of different schedules to work with. I am requesting that you get back to me as soon as you can regarding your schedule the first week of -February. Do you prefer an-pulor pm meeting? Plan on bringing any staff members you feel should attend this meeting. Dave — please contact Cosmopolitan Engineers for their schedule and invitation to this meeting. Chris Keuss is unavailable on Thursday, February 3 from 9am — 1 pm. 1/24/2005 1, � city of edmonds land use application 0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 0 HOME OCCUPATION. 6ky?z 1(00,0 0 FORMAL SUBDIVISION t4emtc I 6t) 0 SHORT SUBDIVISION 'r , - 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT --J-5 0 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT 0 STREET VACATION 0 REzONE K SHORELINE PERMIT 0 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE ExCEPTION FILE # _!!�705 -14 ZONE DAT (915- REC'D BY C FEE4 't-7(, - 7G 6, " RECEIPT# _759 15 HEARING DATE 0 HE 0 STAFF /,4,PB 0 ADB 0 CC ED PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 456 Admiral PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) Public Plaza PROPERTY OWNER Port of Edmonds FE!')` iE i, 2.005 NTER PHONE # 425 774-0549 ADDRESS 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, -WA 08020 E-MAILADDRESS ekeuss@portofedmonds.org FAX # 425 774-7837 TAX ACCOUNT# 4-014 SEC. 23 TwP. 2 7 RNG. 03 SE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE Convert small parking area in front oi the Edmonds Yacht Club into alandscaped Public Plaza. APPLICANT Port of Edmonds —PHONE# 425 774-0549 ADDRESS 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA .08020 E-MAILADDRESS. ekeuss@portofedmonds.org FAx# 425 774-7837 CONTACT PERSON/AGENT_ Chris Keuss PHONE #425 774-0549 ADDRESS 336 Admiral Way Edmo nds, WA 98020. E-MAIL ADDRESS ekeussoportof edmonds. org FAX# 425 774-7837. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by.the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT Property Owner's Authorization DATE By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and p ting attendant to this application. 00�,Iwl t DA SIGNATURE OF OWNER T E*: This application form was revised on 1/27/00. To verify whether it is still current, call (425) 771-0220. L:\LE3RARY\PLANNFNG\Fomis & HandoutsTublic HandoutsUnd Use Application.doc , I 71 :3ms Ism; A LL "J TAW STONE MONUMENT TO "C. KENNETH WISE" E MON U MEN .08 F WIS T /KENNETHE'To FE L SCALE: 1"-20'-0" WASTE M 10CAN 0 10' 20' 40' NEW GRASS BERM PUGET SOUND MHW 10.06' RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER RESTING ON CONCRETE DECK. PLANTER HEIGHT = 2.6' (TYPICAL) REMOVE RAMP MEET AND MATCH NEW H CONCRETE TO EX -St. SIDEWALK (a) .09 NEW CONCRETE PAVER WALKWAY RAISED WOOD DECKING RESTIN ON CONCRETE DECK. WOOD DECKING HEIGHT = 0.9 (TYPICAL) NEW ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP .09 NEW WOOD DECK x L REMOVE RAMP --"ff PATCH ASPHALT, MEET AND MATCH C 0 N, GRIND OFF (i)jj RM #3 PK NAIL N 298577.01 E 1257550.33 RIM IE,,N A < 8)_ EXHAUST VENT FAN R43-ABOVE SIDEWALK NEW SCORED CONCRETE PLAZA BUILDING NEW WOOD ARBOR �-,,�,111AINTA]IN EXISTING RAMP. ANDICAP MEET AND MATCH NEW PARKING PAVING TO EXST RAMP. `--SIGN EXST PARKING STALL AS SHORT TERM AND RELOCATE HANDICAPED, STALL BULKHEAD LINE FLAGPOLE 0 EJB RM #4 .10 TACK IN LEAD G) N 298698.30 -S ONCRETTE CUR E 1257695,97 N,FW PAY 0 ME ELEV = 13.42' RAIS #2 G ----AT I R 4.10 GAS LANTERN ON 8' POLE RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER 2.6' ABOVE CONRETE (TYP.) CBMH #1 RUN DC*NSPOUT ALONG TREWS INT %PLANTER CUT AND CAP CST . PIPE AND CB TECT EXISTING GRl*E.TRAP AND SURROUNDING COftRETE GREASE SEPARATOR VAULT BUILDING 9, \M EN& IM BEGIN ARBOR MAXIMUM HEIGHT 10'-5" NEW EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE PLAZA El 0 0 0 < X X 35 HANDRAIL 0 —P— POWER LINE 16- -W— WATER LINE DATA BASED ON INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. n STORM DRAINAGE TABLE CB #1, RIM = 12.83 4 " PVC E, I E = 11. 3 8" CONC NE, IE = 9.8 CB #2, RIM = 12.81 8" CONC SE, IE = 9.2 CBMH #1, RIM = 13.34 8" METAL NE, lE 8.8 8" CONC SW, IE 8.8 8" CONC NW, IE 8.6 SURVEY LEGEND ENCASED CONCRETE MONUMENT PK NAIL / TACK IN LEAD CB CATCH BASIN CBMH CATCH BASIN MANHOLE DS DOWNSPOUT CO CLEANOUT LIGHT POLE FL FLOOD LIGHT EJB ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX FH FIRE HYDRANT WV WATER VALVE HB HOSE BIB SIGN LEGEND 6. 7 —LIMITOFWORKUNE UNE —SWALE PROPOSED CONTOUR, 113M EXISTING SPOT TO REMAIN BROOM FINISH CONCRETE BARKER E= SCORED CONCRETE LANDSCAPE EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ARCHITECTS PAVERS 1514 NW 52nd St Seattle, WA 981L07 SAND tel 206.783.2870 GRASS fax 206.783.3212 WOOD DECK BOULDERS C) C14 TYPE I CB WITH STAR GRATE c� OD a < a% STEEL PLANTER WITH VINES & PERENNIALS z U C) CL 0 E LLI Lu PROJECT DESCRIPTION LL. u 0 THE PORT OF EDMONDS PUBLIC PLAZA PROJECT WILL REPLACE A CURRENTLY ,UNDER UTILIZED PARKING LOT WITH A NEW WATERFRONT PLAZA FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC AND ANTHONYS BEACH 0 CL CL CAFE %0 Lo PROJECT INCLUDES DEMOLMON OF ASPi-iALT, CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DATE INITIALl SAND BOX WITHIN LIMITS OF WORK 1/7/2005 DRAWN ABC LINE, AND REMOVAL OF AWNINGS. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE REVIEWED jFB NEW CONCRETE AND PAVER 'HARDSCAPE, DRAINAGE, WOOD DECK ,WITH ADA ACCESS, WOOD ARBOR REVISIONS ALONG BUILDING FACADE, SAND PLAY No. DATE JAREA, GRASS MOUND, BOULDERS AND 'PLANTING. 1THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE TALLEST � PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS THE ARBOR .ALONG THE BUILDING FACADE AT IT SCALE I "=20'-O" TALL A TESC PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. PLAN NE PERMIT] SHEET -OF 2 SHEETS SCALE: 1 "-30'-0" 0 1 S' 30' 60' RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER RESTNG ON CONCRETE DECK. it PLANTER HEIGHT = 2.6' (TYPICAL) RAISED WOOD DECKING RESTIN ON CONCRETE DECK. WOOD DECKING HEIGHT = 0.9- (TYPICAL) CB#S (NEW) RIM 12.86 SEE ADD ALT C, B&C (Dj] RM #3 PK NAIL N 298577.01 E 1257550.33 ELEV = 13.01 (D ASPHALT I ION PARKING 01 STONE MONUMENT TO "I "C. KENNETH WISE* BULKHEAD LINE FLA P F EJB RM #4 10 TACK IN LEAD WASTE N 298698.30 CAN E 1257695.97 WASTE ELEV = 13.42' 4As LANTERN ON 8' POI,� RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER 2.6' ABOVE CONRETE (TYP.) COMH #1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIN. m 0 a 91/5 STORM DRAINAGE TABLE bN�. IS 0 -Z a- CS RIM . 00v a "10 4 r r4 #I, = 12.83 4' PVC E, IE = 11.3 1�� 8' CONC NE, IE = 9.8 C8 #2. RIM = 12.81 ;jr pug 8* CONC SE, IE = 9.2 I IMP'. GREASE SEPARATOR VAULT CBMH #1, RIM = 13.34 BUILDING '9. 8: METAL NE, IE = 8.8 8 CONC SW, IE = 8.6 8' CONC NW, IE = 8.6 `-ADDITIVE ALTERNATE B ;VE�HAUST VENT FAN RAISE RIM OF CB# 1. TIE AU' A1306VE SIDEWALK DOWNSPOUT INTO CB#I. CONNECT NEW CB#S TO EXISTING CB#I WITH 6"0 3034 PIPE. ADD ADDITIONAL STAR 13UILDING GRATE AND FRAME. ADDITIVE ALTERNATE C CONNECT CB#5 TO EXST. CB TO THE SOUTHEAST INSTEAD OF CB#1 AS SHWON ON BASE BID. LOCATION OF SOUTHEAST CB IS APPROXIMATE. IF ADD ALT C IS AWARDED, LIMITS OF WORK WILL EXPAND. ADD ALTERNATE A REMOVE APPROX. 165'STAMPED CONCRETE "PAVERS", REPLACE WITH CONCRETE SAWCUT INTO 23" GRID, SEE DETAIL IF ADD ALT A IS AWARDED, LIMITS OF WORK WILL EXPAND. LEGEND _LIMITOFWORKLINE -SWALE LINE - - - PROPOSED CONTOUR +1110 EXISTING SPOT TO REMAIN BROOM FINISH CONCRETE SCORED CONCRETE EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE PAVERS SAND GRASS WOOD DECK BOULDERS TYPE I CB WITH STAR GRATE 0 STEEL PLANTER WITH VINES & PERENNIALS SURVEY LEGEND I� �NCASED CONCRETE MONUMENT I PK NAIL / TACK IN LEAD 0 CB CATCH BASIN @ CBMH CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 0 DS DOWNSPOUT BARKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1514 NW 52nd St. Sealtle, WA 98107 tel 206.783.2870 fax 206.783.3212 C) C4 C) V) CD z 0 0 E Lu _v LL u LU c� 0 zi �: cc 'E 0 CL d- Ln V_ 0 CO CLEANOUT uAlt INITIALl 1 1/7/2005 LIGHT POLE DRAWN ABC FL FLOOD LIGHT REVIEWED JFB EJB ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX REVISIONS FIT FIRE HYDRANT NO. DATE WV WATER VALVE HB HOSE BIB I SCALE I"=30'—O" n SIGN X 3.5' HANDRAIL L= I" x -P- POWER LINE ADDITIVE W- WATER LINE ALTENATES DATA BASED ON INFORMATION SHORELINE PERMIT SUPPLIED B� OTHERS. SHEET 2 OF 2SHEETS DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE Project: Port of Edmonds Public Plaza Description of Proposal: The Port of Edmonds is proposing to replace a currently under utilized parking lot with a new waterfront public plaza for use by the public. The public plaza will cover approximately 7,625 square feet. Work will- include demolition of asphalt, concrete sidewalk and sand box, and removal of awnings. Twelve parking stalls will be eliminated and one ADA stall will be relocated. Proposed improvements include new concrete and paver hardscape, drainage, wood deck and ADA access, a wood arbor along the building faqade, sand play area, grass mound, landscape boulders and planting. This plan has been approved by the Edmonds Architectural Design Board. There are three additive alternatives. Additive alternate A would replace a pedestrian walkway outside the base bid limits of work which is broken up. Additive alternate B is a change in drainage connections within the base bid limits of work. Additive alternate C is a change in drainage connections outside the base bid limits of work. Proponent: Port of Edmonds Location of Proposal: Port of Edmonds 456 Admiral Way Edmonds, Washington, 98020 Section 23 Township 27 Range 03 SE Lead Agency: Port of Edmonds Thelead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by: February 25, 2005 Responsible official: Mr. Chris Keuss Position/Title: Executive Director Phone: 425-774-0549 Address: Port of Edmonds a;;7 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: Signature Chris Keuss 336 Admiral Way Mr. Rob Chave Planning Manager City of Edmonds 121 — 5h Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Rob: 3ORT OF E D M 0 N D S WA 98020-7214 - (425) 774-0549 - (425) 774-7837 FAX September 23, 2004 RECEIVED NOV 0 5 2004 PERMIT COUNTER The Port has a proposal to replace its concrete docks on the north side and east side of out floating bait house, which is between H dock and dock I dock (fuel dock). Attached is a site plan showing the location of these docks. Also, attached is a detailed plan showing the exact docks to be replaced. The replacement docks will be the exact length and width of the existing docks. The reasons for the replacement of the docks are: i. Existing docks are too deep and ate bottoming out during low tide conditions. 2. Connector points are being damaged due to the bottommig out situation. The new floats will be half the depth of the existing floats and will have new connector pieces that will provide some "give" during the extreme low tides when the new docks do bottom out. On behalf of the Port, I am requesting an administrative exemption from the Shoreline Permit Requirement. Again, the reason for this request is that the Port is replacing existing docks with the exact same measurements (except for depth) due to the aforementioned conditions. I would appreciate your review and decision as soon as possible. I will be out of the office over the next two and a half weeks. If you have questions, please contact Bob Yeager, Maintenance Manager, who is very familiar with this project and can be reached at 425 774-0549. Sincerely yours, Christopher W. Keuss CMM Executive Director cc: Bob Yeager 46 feet+ Port of Edmonds Dock Replacement 41 0 D= MTAL -f 00 M E DMONDS P Port of Ed onds Marina 0 P, T 0 F 1 111111 TTTTIT Port Information Rules Leave no wake; harbor speed limit 4 knots. All visiting vessels are required to register upon arrival. Guest fees: (Payable in advance) Moorage: First four hours free; after four hours-50� per foot per day Electricity: $2.00 per day -out time: 12:00 noon. Check Diving is prohibited in the marina unless by Port permission. No fishing, crabbing, squidding or swimming in the marina, No motorized vehicles, bicycles or roller sports on walkways or on docks/piers. Loud and disruptive behavior is prohibited. Please use the recycling and trash containers for marina -related refuse. Posting of signs, posters or distribution of handbills must be approved by the Port. Consumption of alcoholic beverages on Port property is prohibited (except by licensed permit and Port approval). Pets must be on leash and owners are responsible for proper clean up and disposal of animal waste. Storage of items on docks and piers is prohibited. . Q-Pont / Q-Dock ' Better solutions for the Marina Industry Represented by Rob King R. C. Construction & Management Inc. 20503 88'h Av. W. Edmonds, WA. 98026. 425-778-1921 Mr. Bob Yeager Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA. 98020 RECEIVED NOV 0 5 2004 PERMIT COUNTER November 21, 2003 RE: Port of Edmonds, Floating dock replacement project. Quote requested 11-17-03 by Bob Yeager SCOPE: 1. Replace concrete floats on walkway dock betw!,op'�'b�ce 22 inch fiveboard (from H dock) mished floats (16"' ch ft, board) to the North. (App. 72 feet). and the older aggregate f �e Using the Q-Dock concrete walk surface galvanized' �-channel flqx(system- 2. Reconnect the power lift finger to new flo ats. 3. Reconnect fire fine to new floats. 4. Replace, and connect the "Bud's Bait" finger (49 with new floats. (includes recormection of the "Bud's Baif 'bus m*'ess float) V Work includes design, construction, and installation of floats to m6&-, ii�\d match up with existing BM1 floats. Means of longitudinal connection inctude& P4;� o\f Edmonds \agrees to provide a work yard close by . to fabricaib\out., - system'fior initallatiQn. Installation includes Crane, (as needed). Pvrt T tern'Kie, --Permits,"miscellancous fees, removal and disposal of existing marina 'elements, Washington State Sales\,T.ax\,\ Quote for this worl�jk $19,350.00. Q-Pont /Q-Dock will honor"quolib for thirty days. Work must take place within 180 days or we reserve the right to re -quote ifie' pk�ject-*ith then current material prices. 1% Thank you for the opportunity to,,0rovide\yoi Sincerely, Rob King with a lasting repair to your unique problem. J Z Wesffall, John From: Harrison, Marie Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:45 PM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Port of Edmonds float 04-521 Thank you. Robert Yeager 425-774-'0549 A,b j46i"171—_ 9-04�) ----- Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:41 PM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: RE: Port of Edmonds float 04-521 I'll call him. ----- Original Message ----- From: Harrison, Marie Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:38 PM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Port of Edmonds float 04-521 Does Robert Yeager know what he needs to do? ----- Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:34 PM To: Harrison, Marie Cc: Bullis, Ann; Smith, Mike; DST Subject: RE: Port of Edmonds float 04-521 Marie: It's called a Fire Standpipe system (permit-IFC 105.7.11) but in this case "fits" best administratively like a Fire Alarm Permit: $150 fee (50 Bldg / 50 Fd in-house review / 50 FD inspect). Thanks for asking. Can we use Fire Protection System Permit to cover everything else that doesn't fit Fire Sprinkler or Fire Alarm? They are infrequent and can be tracked in your FA/FS statistics. And some occurences may require outside technical review. John ----- Original Message ----- From: Harrison, Marie Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:52 AM To: Westfall, John Subject: Port of Edmonds float 04-521 Hi John: You wrote on the plans "f ire protection system required". What do you mean by f ire protection system? Fire alarm? Fire Sprinkler? Thanks E. Wane %amson, CYPT (Devefopment Services City of Edmonds 1 Message Page I of I AA- Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent-' Friday, November 12, 2004 1:06 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: FW: Temporary Closure of Marina Beach/Dog Beach Members: Grid 151. The park is being closed to repair the sinkhole and effluent line that is located in the north parking lot, south of Port drystack storage yard. Vehicular access will be maintained for emergency purposes only. FM ----- Original Message ----- From: Mcintosh, Brian Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 12:30 PM To: All City Subject: Temporary Closure of Marina Beach/Dog Beach FYI - please spread the word to your neighbors as this has happened rather quickly. Thanks! November 12, 2004 Contact: Brian McIntosh, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director 425-771-0256 Pam Lemke, Engineering Department 425-771-0220 Edmonds Marina Beach & Dog Park Temporarily Closed Due to the extent Qemergency repairs to the Willow Creek pipeline at Marina Beach Park in Edmonds, the park, including all ks beginning Monday, November 15, 2004. 11/12/2004 dw- lp C. is 9,3 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0215 - FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 www.edmondsfire.org October 7, 2004 Mr. Chris Keuss Port Director Edmo�ds, WA 98b20_ Re: Marina Standpipe Systems Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance Dear Chris: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Mr. Ray Johnson asked me specifics regarding the 5-yr hydrostatic test for the Port Marina fire protection standpipe systems. I hope you will share this letter with Bob and Ray regarding the general and specific information I've provided here. The existing standpipes systems were installed in 1998 and later. They are comprised of fire department connection fittings, steel pipe joiners, hangers, outlets approximately every 100' along the piers and HDPE (high -density polyethylene) piping laid underwater as the primary conveyance for fire protection water. The HDPE piping is not a listed material for fire protection service and was approved as an alternative material in this fire protection service application. I still feel this is a perfectly sensible application for the marine environment, where corrosion and freezing temperatures can impair and shorten the life of steel pipe. Normal acceptance testing of steel pipe systems include a hydrostatic integrity test typically implemented at 200 psi for 2 hours. Because of the elasticity of the HDPE, a hydrostatic acceptance test variation was approved that included a series of hourly pressurizations until the HDPE had reached less than a 2% drop (4 psi) for a 2 hour interval. I believe this same testing method can be repeated to meet the intent for the required 5 year hydrostatic test of HDPE. I have attached a copy of those acceptance tests for your review. I discourage maintaining these pressure levels in the HDPE for anymore time than required to meet positive test results. As of July 1 with the adoption of the International Building and Fire Codes, there are new requirements in the inspection, testing, and maintenance (ITM) for all water -based fire protection systems. The owner's responsibility and proper documentation for ITM procedures are now specifically outlined and mandated by State law. As ominous as this sounds, the purpose here is the continued assurance that fire protection systems will operate as designed and as installed for the owner's best interests throughout the life of a structure and for the sake of fire emergency responders. The requirements for standpipe ITM comes from NFPA Standard 25 Chapter 3 that I have included with this letter. Some requirements may not apply to every system, depending upon configuration Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Citv - Hekinan. JaDan and material used. Those applicable requirements, however, are now the minimum acceptable inspections, tests and frequency requirements and may (or may not) constitute a great change in how the Port maintains your systems and service documentation. Previous limited maintenance requirements came from national fire protection standards of serviceability. Servicer "qualifications" also are currently being evaluated by the State and Snohomish County to establish a standard of expertise to perform the various levels of ITM for a particular type of fire protection system. I will let you know when these requirements are adopted and published. For now, Bob and Ray may continue their ITM work as "having adequate knowledge of the (system) installation, construction, or operation of apparatus and the hazards involved". Please call me at (425) 771-0213 if you have further questions regarding this letter and the changes herein. Please provide Inspector Mike Smith or myself with a copy of your satisfactory test documentation and be sure to save your original. Si I ohn J. We9tfall ire Marshal Cc: Fire Chief Tomberg * Q i June 5, 1998 Bill Gerkin, P.E. Peratrovich, -Nottinghm & Drige, Inc. 8 11 first Avenue, Suite 260 Seatfle.. WA 99104 Subjcct: Edmonds Marina Reconstruction, HYro' test of Fire Protection Lines Dear Bill: McGOWAN BROZ f U G I N k f R S J have reviewed 'lie hydrotest procedure and results for the HDPE fire.lines at the Edmonds Marina. The procedure that was used to test the fines is full): comparable to a two-hour static test on an equivalentiron pipe system. The procedure used at the marina, in which the HDPE pipe is "stretched"at a pressute. slightly higher than test pressure and then allowtd to relax, is appro-.)riata for the rriatenal and fulfiUs. tile intent of the des' gn drawings and specifications. In. my opinion, the system as installed and tested meets die intent of the di-awings and is satisfactory for Multidiscipline service. reqba-L-fif!�X Please call Bil! Lchner or me. if you have any questions. Sincere", William R, Broz, P. E. Vice President "2 r7 EVIRES I N f : i ) k P , ) R A T F. D 12928 Northup ANay - Suite 2CO UNc,mc, Washington 98005 T- 425�646-3588 - F: 425/646-9843 3 1(): ZI 86. Unf -S�9113 20',49 NUM09DW 14, V11 vo I J. 00 &44vu U44 1000 r ;I 0"n I I L�V_ 95427.19C Port of Edmonds Marina Reconstruction SOUTH MARINA FIRE LINE PRESSURE TEST 08/12/98 Lm Press Kentzarg 7:15 AM 230 psi 8:15 AM 230 psi 9:15 AM 220 psi 10:25 AM 220 psi Test 11:10 AM 205 psi Bleed back to test pressure from 220 psi, P, N & D inspector on site to witness test. 12:10PM 203 psi Passed 08/13/98 IWX Pressure Re -Charge 7:30 AM 230 psi 8:15 AM 220 psi 9:00 AM 220 psi Test 1:50 PM 205 psi Bleed back to test pressure from 218 psi, P, N & D inspector on site to witness test. 2:55 PM 202 psi Passed uti/ V51/98 u1j: U9 UZOU U24 1388 V N & 1) SLATILE itij U U Z/ U.U.13 95427.19C Port of Edmonds Marina Reconstractian PORT OF EDMONDS MARINA RECONSTRUCTION SOUTH MARINA FIRE LINE PRXSSURF TEST Time Pressure Min, Re-Cbarae 05/28/98 C-D Dock Fire 8:45 AM 220 psi 10:30 AM 195 psi 220 psi 11:30 AM 205 psi 220 psi 1:00 PM 210 psi Reduce to 200 psi for test, P, N & D inspector not on site 3:00 PM 195 psi PN & D inspector on site, Re -Charge to 200 psi for test Test 3:00 P.Ad 4:00 PM 200 psi 196 psi _j Passed �WIXY)PD 05/28198 E-FDockFire ID:20AM 220 psi 11:30 AM 189 psi 220 psi 1:00 PM 190 psi 220 psi 2:15 PM 195 psi 220 psi 3:15 PM 197 psi P, ' N & D inspector on site, cbarge to 200 psi for test Test 3.15 PM 200 psi 4:15 PM 196 psi Passed 4a�.D 06J03/98 G Dock Fire 11:30 AM 220 psi 12:30 PM 199 psi 220 pai 1:30 PM 210 psi 220 psi 2:30 P_N4 213 psi Left at 213 psi Test 3:25 PM 209 psi P, N & D insp=or on site, start test at 209 psi 4:25 PM 202 psi Passed 06/04/98 14 Dock Fire System under pressure overnight 210 psi to 190 psi 7:30 AM Igo psi 220 psi 8:30 AM 212 psi 2120 psi 9:30 AM 218 psi Lieft at 21,13 psi 10: 15 AM 215 psi P, N &_ D inspt:clor on site, reduced pressure to 200 psi for test Test 10:15 AM 11:15 AM 210 psi 209 Passed psi 4fig 7 /L.- 06/05/98 09: 09 U206 624 1.388 P & D SEATTLE 95427.19C Port of Edmonds Marina Reconstruction L0063/UO3 NORTH MARINA FIRE LINE PRESSURE TEST lim Pressure 01/26/93 M Dock Fire 9:00 AM 2^110 psi 10:30 AM 195 psi 11:30 AM 195 psi 12:30 PM 205 psi 1:30 PM 205 psi Test 2:30 PNI 205 psi 3-30 PM 195 psi N Dock Fire 9:00 AM 230 psi 10:30 AM 195 psi 11:30 AM 200 psi 12:30 PM 200 psi 1:30 PM 215 psi Test 2:30 P1*1 205 psi 3:35 PM 196 psi K Dock Fire 9:30 AM 230 psi 10:30 AM 215 psi 11:30 AM 210 psi 12:30 PM 210 psi 1:30 PM 205 psi Test 2:25 PM 205 psi 3:00 PM 205 psi -14 4:00 PM 205 psi r-' OV29198 1womej 215 psi 215 psi 215 psi 215 psi Bleed back to test pressure, P, N & D inspector on site Passed e� �ww 215 psi 215 psi 215 psi Bleed back to test pressure, P, N & D inspector on site - —'d Passed/'��z -WOD 215 psi 215 psi 215 psi Bleed back to test pressure, P, N & D inspectoT on site Passed 45A I Dock Fire 10:OOAM 200 psi 215 psi 11:00 AM 204 psi 215 psi 12:00 PM 205 psi 215 psi 1:00 PM 205 psi 215 psi 2:00 PM 205 psi 215 psi Test 3:00 PM 205 psi 4:00 PM 205 psi t. Passed L D,,jck Fire 9:30 AM 230 psi 10:30 AM 210 psi 11:30 AM 195 psi 215 psi 12:30 PM 200 psi 215 psi 1:30 PM 207 psi 215 psi Test 2:30 PM 207 psi 3:45 PM 199 psi Passed J Dock Fire 9:45 AM 230 psi 10:45 AM 200 psi 215 psi 11:45 AM 205 psi 215 psi 1:00 PM 200 psi 215 psi 2:00 PM 204 psi 215 psi Test 3:00 PM 205 psi Bleed tack to test pressure 4:00 PM 205 psi Passed Plot:. Tesr performed as per manufactures recomendedprocedure. National Fire Codes 0 Online - Copyright (0 NFPA, All Rights Reserved Fage I of 2-1 Chapter 1 General Informition 1-1 Scope. d ifiaintenafi66 bf This document establishes the'Mim'"IMEM" 'i mefiff f6r e peno ic inspection;,testing, an require watei-based fire protectibfi'�y'sie"ii'i"i fficlt . idiirg ffid_FiWid.ihid 'm�-a'r"m.'re"�a-wp"plications. The types of sistems "ted d, d h6k" fi)Eid'iWat& spray,an '"Vn , d i , addressed by this standard iric Me,- f,"sthfidpipe an _Ltd, I n c I i i d i d'a 're, fl; Oe "WwtF s u - I 1'e, -s � t fiak'a r 'e such as private fire service mains and fd�` pabf these syste 'U%i&s that *F6" I appurtenances; ift pumps arid'-ww-at_e'r#"st6r*agp ffiKifid i�ifei� 066w:, The document also addRsses impairment handling and reporting. This standard applies to fire protection systems that have been properly installed in accordance with generally accepted practices. Where a system has not been installed in accordance with generally accepted practices, the corrective action is beyond the scope of this standard. The corrective action to ensure that the system performs in a satisfactory manner shall be in accordance with the appropriate installation standard. (See Cha ter 12.) p - ___ 4"7wW`_ith_� �FPAI TO --d_&c'ord'an`ce d nd hillid in c4f' 77"iis sta�ddrd shall not apply to sprinkler.#stim--s'design F.i e a ins or t& JWs"tadl'�tio"!nhf �ikkr tems in One- and To;6-F�rmly L)�,ellings and Manufacture'd Standardf Homes. 1-2* Purpose. The purpose of this document is to provide requirements that ensure'a'reas6i�abl"e'd.e'�gi-ee"of protection 0 life thod§ for water-b;ised fire' and pfooertj fi6A'firi"thr6ugli mn 1 'mum mspection� t6ting�'and maintenance me *0. ection sys ems.- rt In those cases where it is determined that an existing situation can involve a istinct h t lif or prope y, r1w 'iind'iriaint6h&i6Ji-ffi*eth6ds in'- I 'he a-pitho-n-6y, fiNym"' Efigirihill-13. gJunsdi b& befffiftfiid to require inspection, testing, .Xdess*of tho'se reqfii�d bfih� kkidird. 1-2. A' plication. - t-L* p It is not the intent of this document to limit or restrict the use of other inspection, testing, or maintenance programs that provide an equivalent level of system integrity and performance to that detailed in this document. The authority having jurisdiction shall be consulted and approval obtained for such alternative programs. 1-3 Water -Based Fire Protection System Descriptions. 1-3.1* Sprinkler System. An integrated system of underground and overhead piping designed for fire protection purposes and designed in accordance with fire protection engineering standards. The installation includes one or more automatic water supplies. The portion of the sprinkler system above ground is a network of specially sized or hydraulically designed piping installed in a building, structure, or area, generally overhead. Sprinklers are attached to the piping in a systematic pattern. The valve controlling each system riser is located in the system riser or its supply piping. Each sprinkler system riser includes a device for actuating an alarm when the system is in operation. The system usually is activated by heat from a fire and discharges water over the fire area. Wet Pipe System. A sprinkler system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing water and connected to a water supply so that water discharges immediately from sprinklers opened by heat from a fire. (See Chap - --- ors 2 and 9.) Hose connectionsP 1/2-in. (38.1-mm) hose, valves, and nozzles] supplied by sprinkler system piping are considered components of the sprinkler system. Antifteeze System. A wet pipe system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing an antifreeze solution and connected to a water supply. The antifreeze ' solution is discharged, Ilowed by water, immediately upon operation of sprinklers opened by heat from a fire. (See ChqpLers_2 and Dry Pipe System. A system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing air or littn-//PrlmnnAcrilp/nfnnhin/IneytriliNFPA/nfn,qOOO').5 I/nfe-eiirrent-11910?fn=document-frame.h... 9/27/2004 National Fire Codes & Online - Copyright C NFPA, All Rights Reserved Page 2 of 21 nitrogen under pressure, the release of which (as from the opening of a sprinkler) allows the water pressure to open a valve known as a dry pipe valve. The water then flows into the piping system and out the opened ;prinklers. (See Chapters- 2 and 9.) Deluge System. A system employing open sprinklers attached to a piping system and connected to a water supply through a valve that is opened by the operation of a detection system installed in the same areas as the sprinklers. When this valve opens, water flows into the piping system and discharges from all sprinklers attached thereto. (See Chqptjer4� 2, 7, 8 - , and 9.) Preaction System. A sprinkler system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing air that might or might not be under pressure, with a supplemental detection system installed in the same areas as the sprinklers. Actuating means of the valve are described in 3-3.2.1 of NFPA 13, Standardfor the Installation ofSprinkler Systems.'After the valve has been actuated, it opens, and water flows into the. sprinkler system piping to be discharged from any sprinklers that are open. (See Chaptcjjs 2 and 9.) Combined Dry Pipe-Preaction System. A sprinkler system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing air under pressure, with a supplemental detection system installed in the same areas as the sprinklers. Operation of the detection system actuates tripping devices that open dry pipe valves simultaneously and without loss of air pressure in the system. Operation of the detection system also opens listed air exhaust valves at the end of the feed main, which usually precedes the opening of the sprinklers. The detection system also serves as an automatic fire alann system. (See Chaphers-2 and 9.) 1-3.2 Standpipe System. An arrangement of piping, valves, hose connections, and allied equipment installed in a building or structure with the hose connections located in such a manner that water can be discharged in streams or spray patterns through attached hose and nozzles for the purpose of extinguishing a fire, thus protecting a building or structure and its contents in addition to protecting the occupants. This is accomplished by connections to water supply systems or by pumps, tanks, and other equipment necessary to provide an adequate supply of water to the hose onnections. (See Chaptgr fVet Stand1fipeSystein. A system that has the supply valve open and the water pressure maintained at all times. Dry Standpipe System. A system that shall be arranged as follows: (a) Includes devices to admit water to the system automatically by opening a hose valve (b) Admits water to the system through manual operation of remote control devices located at each hose station (c) Has no pen-nanent water supply (A filled standpipe having a small water supply connection to keep the piping filled by requiring water to be pumped into the system shall be considered to be a dry standpipe.) 1-3.3 Combined Standpipe and Sprinkler Systern. A system where the water piping services both 21/2-in. (63.5-mm) outlets for fire department use and outlets for automatic sprinklers. (See ChaDlers 2 and 3.) 1-3.4 Private Fire Sen-ice Main. The pipe and its appurtenances located on private property between a source of water and the base of the riser (i.e., the flange, the flange and spigot piece, or the base tee) for automatic sprinkler systems, open sprinkler systems, water spray fixed systems, standpipe systems, inlets to foam -making systems, or the base elbow of private hydrants or monitor nozzles. Where connected to a public water system, the private service main begins at a point designated by the public water utility, usually at a manually operated valve near the property line. Wher e connected to fire pumps, the main begins at the fire -protection- system side of the pump discharge valve. Where connected to a gravity or pressure tank, the main begins at the inlet side of the tank's check valve. (See �qpti�r 4.) Private fire service mains can include supply and distribution piping installed above ground, in trenches, and inside or outside of buildings. The provisions of this section also apply to pipeline strainers. 6"n-//PAmr%nrlcfilp/nfnnk;n/lnpvtrll]/MPPA/nfn,qnOO?5 I/nfe.-ciirri-.nt-119109fn=clor.iiment-frqmf-.b 9/7.7/?004 .'t National Fire Codes 9 Online - Copyright (D NFPA, All Rights Reserved Page lof4 Chapter 3 Standpipe and Hose Systems 3-1 General. This chapter provides the minimum requirements for the routine inspection, testing, and maintenance of standpipe and hose systems. Table 3-1 shall be used to deten-nine the minimum required frequencies for inspection, testing, and maintenance. Exception: Valves andfire department connections shall be inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with Chapter_q. 3-1.1 Impairments. The inspection, testing, and maintenance of standpipe and hose systems can involve or result in a system that is out of service. The procedures outlined in Chapterl-l- shall be followed where such an impairment to protection occurs. 3-2 Inspection. 3-2.1 Components of standpipe and hose systems shall be visually inspected quarterly or as specified in Table -3- 1. 3-2.2 Checkpoints and corrective actions outlined in Table.3-2.3 shall be followed to determine that components are free of corrosion, foreign material, physical damage, tampering, or other conditions that could prevent operation. 3-2.3 1 able 3-2.3 shall be used for the inspection, testing, and maintenance of all classes of standpipe and hose systems. 3-3 Testing. The tests shall be conducted by a qualified person. (See Section 1-5.) Where water damage is a possibility, an air test shall be conducted on the system at 25 psi (1.7 bar) prior to introducing water to the system. 3-3.1 Flow Tests. 3-3.1.1* A flow test shall be conducted at the hydraulically most remote hose connection of each zone of a standpipe system to verify the water supply still adequately provides the design pressure at the required flow. Where a flow test of the hydraulically most remote outlet(s) is not practical, the authority having jurisdiction shall be consulted for the appropriate location for the test. A flow test shall be conducted every 5 years. Table 3-1 Summary of Standpipe and Hose System Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance Components Activity Frequency Reference Control valves Inspection Weekly/monthly Table 9-1 Pressure regulating devices Inspection Quarterly Table 9-1 Piping Inspection Quarterly 3-2.1 Hose connections Inspection Quarterly Table 9-1 Cabinet Inspection Annually NFPA 1962 All /XTI:D A National Fire Codes 0 Online* - Copyright (D NFPA, All Rights Reserved Page 2 of 4 Hose Inspection Annually NFPA 1-9.62 Hose storage device Inspection Annually NFPA 1962 Alarm device Test Quarterly Table 9- 1 Hose nozzle Test Annually NF-PA.1962 Hose storage device Test Annually NFPA--196-2. Hose Test 5 years/3 years NFPA.1962 Pressure control valve Test 5 years Table 9-1 Pressure reducing valve Test 5 years Table 9-1 Hydrostatic test Test 5 years 3-3.2 Flow test Test 5 years 3-3.1 Main drain test Test Annually Table.9-:1 Hose connections Maintenance Annually Valves (all types) Maintenance Annually/as needed Table 9- 1. Table 3-2.3 Standpipe and Hose Systems Component/Checkpoint Corrective Action Hose Connections Cap missing Replace Fire hose connection damaged Repair Valve handles missing Replace Cap gaskets missing or deteriorated Replace Valve leaking Close or repair Visible obstructions Remove Restricting device missing Replace Manual, semiautomatic, or dry Lubricate or repair standpipe — valve does not operate smoothly Piping Damaged piping Repair Control valves damaged Repair or replace Missing or damaged pipe support Repair or replace device Damaged supervisory devices Repair or replace Hose Inspect The hose, including gaskets, shall be removed and inspected and the hose reracked or rereeled at intervals in accordance with NFPA j 902, Standardfor the Care, Use, and Service Testing of Fire Hose Including Couplings and Nx%-Ies. Mildew, cuts, abrasions, and Replace with listed, lined,jacketed hose deterioration evident Coupling damaged Replace or repair Gaskets missing or deteriorated Replace Incompatible threads on coupling Replace or provide thread adapter L--. I --- +All /XTVDA I/nf�--i-iirrpnt-l*?ni4?fn=(inc.iime.nt-frime.h... 9/27/2004 T,,Iational Fire Codes 9 Online - Copyright 0 NFPA, All Rights Reserved Page 3 of 4 Hose not connected to hose rack nipple or valve Hose test outdated Hose Nozzle Hose nozzle missing Gasket missing or deteriorated Obstructions Nozzle does not operate smoothly Hose Storage Device Difficult to operate Damaged obstruction Hose improperly racked or rolled Nozzle clip in place and nozzle correctly contained? If enclosed in cabinet, will hose rack swing out at least 90 degrees? Cabinet Check overall condition for corrod.ed or damaged parts Difficult to open Connect Retest or replace in accordance with N_FPA 19.62, Standardfor the Care, Use, and Service Testing of Fire Hose Including Couplings and Aoz:les. Replace with listed nozzle Replace Remove Repair or replace Repair or replace Repair or replace Remove Remove Replace if necessary Repair or remove any obstructions Repair or replace parts; replace entire cabinet if necessary Repair Cabinet door will not open fully Repair or move obstructions Door glazing cracked or broken if cabinet is break -glass type, is lock functioning properly? Glass break device missing or not attached Not properly identified as containing fire equipment Visible obstructions All valves, hose, nozzles, fire extinauisher, etc., easily accessible Replace Repair or replace Replace or attach Provide identification Remove Remove any material not related 3-3.1.2 All systems shall be flow tested and pressure tested at the requirements in effect at the time of the installation. The actual test method(s) and performance criteria shall be discussed in advance with the authority having jurisdiction. 3-3.1.3 Standpipes, sprinkler connections to standpipes, or hose stations equipped with pressure reducing valves or pressure regulating valves shall have these valves inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 9. .3.1.4 A main drain test shall be perfortned on Class II or III standpipe systems in accordance with the requirements of ChapteiL9. The test shall be performed at the low point drain.for each standpipe or the main drain test . I III MTT" A h... 9/9.7/2004 '"LlUllal r ire Uodes 0 Online - Copyright 0 NFPA, All Rights Reserved Page -,I connection where the supply main enters the building (when provided). Pressure gauges shall be Provided for the test and shall be maintained in accordance with 2-3.2. 3-3.2 Hydrostatic Tests. 3-3.2.1 Hydrostatic tests at not less than 200-psi (I 3.8-bar) pressure for 2 hours, or at 50 psi (3.4 bar) in excess of the maximum Pressure, where maximum pressure is in excess of I So psi ( bar), shall be conducted every 5 years on dry standpipe Systems and dry Portions Of wet standpipe systems. 10.3 3--1.2.- 2* Hyd ostatic tests shall be conducted in accordance with 3-3.Z I on any system that has been modified or repaired or where an inspection indicates that there is rea-_ j - Properly in an emergency. son to believe that the system could fail to operate 3-3.2.3 The hydrostatic test pressure shall be measured at the low elevation point of the individual system or zone being tested. The inside standpipe Piping shall show no leakage. 3-3.3 Alarm Devices. Where provided, waterflow alarm and supervisory devices shall be tested on a quarterly basis. Excepaon: ff"herefre alloivs. ez'ng cOndifions necessitale a delay in festing, fests shall be petfornied as soon as ij -ealher 3-4 Maintenance. Maintenance/repairs shall be in accordance with 3-2,3 and Tab 3-5 Records. -le 3-2.3. I �ecords shall be maintained in accordance with Section 1-8. ATIT11 A Wesffall, John From: White, Donald Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:10 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Port hydrants FYI, 5 hydrants South of the fuel dock including the rack storage area are out of service until further notice. The hydrants on the East side of Admiral way "should" be in service per the Water Department. Water will keep us informed as they get more info, and they will be on scene to assist us while they are making emergency repairs. DW �PORT �OF E D M 0 N D S y EdpbQds, WA 98020-7214 (425) 774-0549 (425) 774-7837 FAX _=V R�4 Mr. John J. Westfall Fire Marshal City of Edmonds 121-5 h Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. W JFD) E C ",EiO V, 115E February 20,2004 1 �*'6 C( FEB 2 3 2004 EDMONDS FIRE D.EPT. I have recently received your letter dated February 7, 2004 regarding City Council Ordinance #3452, which increases Fire Pern-,dt Fees to $30. It is my understanding from discussing this situation last year with Councilmember Wilson, council representative, assigned to the Port of Edmonds, that the Port would be exempt from payment of this fee. The exemption is based on the fact that the Port of Edmonds does provide several gratis programs to the City of Edmonds Fire Department and that the inspection fees and other permitting fees would be offset by the services provided by the Port. Please feel free in contacting my office should you have any questions or wish follow up to the aforementioned. Sincerely Yours, aeu-4-� Christopher W. Keuss CMM Executive Director cc: Commissioner Fred Gouge Councilmember Dave Orvis CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0215 FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT www.edmondsfire.org C. 1 February 24, 2004 Mr. Chris Keuss Port Director Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Chris: I apologize for the oversight in our fire permit review and billing process. You will not be responsible for Permit fees. We will forward your permits to you by virtue or our earlier arrangements facilitated through Councilmember Wilson. The $90 permit fees (three locations) are not an exemption for you. City ordinance does not allow the Fire Department to arbitrarily exempt fees for one private enterprise or another, including not - for -profit businesses and places of worship. Permitted occupancies all require annual safety surveys that are conducted by Fire Inspectors under billable hours, and that is the rationale for the change in fee structure. The Port of Edmonds fire inspection hours and permit fees are provided "in -kind" for training/emergency use of your oil spill craft and locker rental for firefighter's foul - weather equipment used during emergencies at the Port. I apologize again for the billing error. Thank you for staying fire -safe! Cc: Mayor Haakenson Fire Chief Tomberg n J. Westfall 11, Marshal Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Citv - Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0215 - FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT C_ . 1 SC)", Mr. Chris Keuss Port of Edmonds in in a I , a, 'E'r1FH`5`nd9—,VVX-98020 Dear Chris: www.edmondsfire.org August 8, 2003 GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR This letter is in response to your concern regarding the coiling of shore pow' er cordsets on the docks at each slip with electrical utilities. Port of Edmonds Regulations (Jan 2000) Section 16.2 G specifically prohibits the practice. Your questions are whether this is a valid concern and why? The use of electrical wiring in a marina environment requires special consideration due to the existence of hazards from: 1) wet and corrosive moisture, 2) high and low temperature exposures, 3) flammable and combustible liquids use and storage, 4) electrical equipment and facilities used by persons with limited control by management staff, and 5) locations subject to movement, mechanical shock, and vibrations. All electrical materials, devices, appliances, fittings, cords and cordsets shall be listed or labeled for their purpose by a qualified testing agency, e.g. Underwriter's Laboratories (UL) or Factory Mutual (FM). The electrical devices or cords should not be altered. The codes and standards utilized to evaluate these concerns include Uniform Fire.Code (UFC) Article 85, National Fire Protection Agency (NFIPA) 70-National Electrical Code Article 555, NFPA 302-Fire Protection Standard for Pleasure and Commercial Motor Craft, NFPA 303-Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards, and NFPA's Fire Protection Handbook. The Fire Department has no problems with the coiling of listed marine shore power cordsets on the pier. NFPA 302 recommends that shore power cords be a minimum length of 25 feet. Coiling the cords can reduce trip hazards on the pier. I am unsure of the history surrounding this requirement, however, concerns may have stemmed from inferior cords fabricated by boat owners that did not meet ampacity requirements for the service. Electrically undersized cords can heat, and when coiled, can heat themselves further, posing risk of fire and injury. To meet the listing standards for Shore power cords and marine extension cords, the,wires are generous in ampacity, moisture -resistant, and better insulated than their "shore" counterparts. Cords need still be verified to meet the maximum and minimum limitations for the particular service that they will be put to use. I endorse the Port's cord inspection and tagging program identified in Section 16.2 F. Please contact me at (425) 771-0213 if you have further questions. Sincerely, Jopn J. W Fife Mars[ Cc: Chief Tomberg a Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 E L) FIRE PREVENTION 13UREAU 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0213 Fax (425) 775-7721 . 0 FAX COVER PAGE' TO: DATE TRANSMITTED: NUMBER OF -PAGES: (Including Cover Page) Recipient's Fax Number: -7-74 -763.7 -Z FROM: j - W, If there are any problems FIRE DEPARTMENT during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call (425) 771TO215 and ask for JOHN WESTFALL 5� TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 08/08/2003 11:29 NAME FAX TEL DATEJIME 08/08 11:28 FAX.NO./NAME 94257747837 DURATION 00:01:02 PAGE(S) 02 RESULT OK MODE STANDARD ECM Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:56 PM To: Fischer, Michael Cc: Smith Mike Subject: Port �tandpipult�� Sorry for the belated response. The period for standpipe hydrostatic test is five, years. Docks M & N were recently installed and accepted. The rest of the port systems are probably soon due. The HDPE plastic now specified and installed on all docks does stretch under pressure. 200 psi hydro pressure for 2 hours is a parameter for rigid wall (steel) pipe. With HDPE, a series of cumulative pressurizations and stretches is completed then the 2 hour test with no more than 10% loss. More time required to test, but greater pipe longevity. John .13 I-S" 6 A4) /'It k 4A_ L_ CITY OFEDMONDS 121 5TH AYENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0215 - FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRP-��)FPARTMENT www.edmondsfire.org Re: Electrical Usage/Installation Concerns at Port of Edmonds Dear Mr. Kruzich: W GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Fire Chief Tomberg received your letter of concern of 5/28/03 regarding the electrical installation and usage at the Port of Edmonds. Chief Tomberg forwarded your questions to me for determination and resolution. I notified the City Building Official who is the local precedent authority for building and electrical installations. On 5/29/03 1 made telephone contact with Mr. Jim Hendricks, Electrical Inspections Supervisor for WA State Division of Labor and Industries (L&I), Everett office. The City of Edmonds Development Services Department has no electrical inspection division -all electrical permits and inspections are administered by the Everett L&I office. Mr. Hendricks immediately assigned one of his inspectors to review the installation and practices of concern. On 5/30/03 1 provided a faxed Agency Inspection request to the Everett L&I office to report and clarify your concerns. I included a copy of your letter with my request. .1 interpreted your concerns to include the following: 1) the use of circuit breaker as a switch for fixed -installation heater, 2) prior approved installation of the heater and circuit disconnect, 3) location of the disconnect in relation to the heater equipment, 4) practice of disconnecting the heater and circuit in ambient temperatures over 40 degrees F., anc 5) outstanding current electrical installation permit 2063062. The State inspection found no deficiency of installation nor improper/unsafe use of equipment. The 1969 installation was evaluated against the (then current) 1968 edition of National Electrical Code (NEC). There are seldom new requirements that warrant upgrade of previously -approved and existing installations in any of a building systems' work. Consumer- and manufacturer -recalled equipment is an example of what might be required of the owner to be upgraded/replaced, should that equipment create a safety hazard. As compared to the latest (2002) edition of the NEC, the questionable breaker disconnect of concern would only require an additional locking feature to eliminate the reenergization of the circuit arid shock to an electrician that may be working on the circuit. That is if the approved work was installed and sought for acceptance today. This feature is a maintenance safety allowance not a fire safety consideration and creates no substantial hazard warranting upgrade. 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Your concerns are-oddressed as such: 1 accordiqp to L&I, only fluorescent and high -density lighting circuits are required%to have switch -rated circuit disconnects for switching duty. Circuit d.is",' nects for heaters and motors apparently can be used as a means to ,pop h and disconnect the equipment regularly from their power source. EV6h �so, the pradtice of turning the heater off at the Port is not a daily ot6uerencb, byi a6easonal event. 2) 1�§tglfatiq&,ap�pi&ed and accepted upon installation in 1969 per NEC (1968 edii,6n t 3) The "out-b I & I 6�quip*ment-site" location of the circuit disconnect was approved and accepted in 1969. The 2002 edition would require locking feature to assure that a circuit being worked on could be locked for circuit worker safety. 4) 1 can think of no safety problems created by disconnection of heating circuits in the spring and summer months. 5) The outstanding electrical permit you cite has to do with approved utility -work at docks,N-0-P and nothing to do with the installation of your concern. No inspecting agency to my knowledge practices issuance of "stop -work" on unrelated work requiring corrections. Enforcement is the means to correct valid problems that are existing and a cause of hazard. Do not fear the Fire Department's culpability. As the fire safety authority having jurisdiction and the local emergency services delivery agency, we are placed in situations each day and everynight that require the utmost skills, expertise, procedural awareness, and legal demands expected for the safe and professional delivery of all of our services. We do take your concerns seriously, if that is your warning. I echo the appreciation of your civic responsibility in reporting your concerns to us. Let me know if you require further clarification or if I may be of any further assistance. My telephone is (425) 771-0213 for that purpose. I have included a copy of the L&I inspection report for your viewing and that you may avoid the public information request requirement. . I S, r John J. W/s �ire Marshal Cc: Fite Chief Tomberg Building Official Jeannine Graf MAY 29 103 08:37RI WASH L&I-EVERET.T IFL *o� 0 03. C`--7 06 0'7 P.2/2 Dqmmeru of Labor ft WwVia AGENCY REQUESTED INSPEMON MAIL TO LOCAL L&I OMCZ - gag LOCAL VIRRICTORY Plism pt� hard-3rd copy b P01114111 FOR AD . DRESS =33326 _j Aferfil - Send compkIed request 19 wtd *k4VIM&*M q*U6 m obswg4 (v S17 W) 0 ag" &Woe xic AINC 4 L4. I I fw;, 50M *Ala 5 WA 9602,0 kRrrWcD &W R6 _L_ 0I &WW -r"PWR4 FeAr &CME OF �Ml- IT-i-4* 040ezAc 334. A4>%41eA'L L#-I 4,1 VIOW.S-W,7r-�� W4C—V j6A(61W"- civ am C50L-I�5 wA e?8o2,o ff::a!Lat�&jev -/I .9c"-,--)1MoV6 jWj$MW vmakft foquM D�5.pt;^�FO FOC-7* tS 9WM26gj Ft" Mik S,46A2!�6a--S A9110I MIUmS adilms 5-.j4 ? Wi" 12,; A -I IV lb scm zP-4 q E30 W Aft?,4M IN A fb7C Neatest wmin cmnead erAt Cilcol'ri0f k). MYMAII0 Jr. IMA'd IMI, W rA A At REPORT OF INSPECTION only needed Permit Required. The datrical safety cor . rections listed below are harally'ordeved, 9111d must be compbad within 13 days. Rckjr to National Elccwkal Code and SUW RuW for Standardii. -7 " '11;!! _M '-90 ale A . . . . . . ..... . - --Wff=7104 1 M-441E - - — N 4 2003 Inspeowl8sump P, :3 Do NOT concul clectrical wo* prior Eo wWon—appz0val. jG2g) psw.� samaym*wmatinicmdon s-99 white -permit Canw7-4spartment Cord-jobsille — a MOJAW is Message Page 1 of 2 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 10:56 AM To: 'Jeffrey Wilson' Cc: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: RE: New Fire Inspection Fees for Port Jeff: Permit fees will total $60 (for two permits) provided that locations and hazardous processes remain unchanged. Multiple hazardous processes are allowed under a single permit and permits are provided for each process location. There are two permitted sites at the port: 336 Admiral Way, Port office and shop, including boatyard. Hazardous processes: Storage & handling of flammable and combustible liquids and welding operations. and 458 Admiral Way, Marina fueling dock. Hazardous processess: MV fuel dispensing and storage, sales & handling of flammable and combustible liquids. Please email or phone if I may be of further assistance. John Westfall 425 771-0213. ----- Original Message ----- From: Tornberg, Thomas Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003,12:00 PM To: 'Jeffrey Wilson' Cc: Westfall, John Subject: RE: New Fire Inspection Fees for Port Jeff- I do not. Fire Marshal John Westfall worked the 1000 PM to 6 AM schedule on TOPOFF 2 in Seattle, and will not be in today. However, he will receive this email tomorrow and will respond with the amounts. Thanks. TT ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeffrey Wilson [mailto:JeffW(cD.MulvannyG2.Com] Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 6:53 AM To: Tom Tomberg (E-mail) Subject: New Fire Inspection Fees for Port J Chief, R Do you know how much the new fees (the ones we just passes) might cost the Port on an annual basis? Thanks! Jeff Jeffrey S. Wilson, AICP Senior Project Manager 5/14/2003 - Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 3:02 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Port Standpipe System cks M & N Members: All docks are now provided with a viable standpipe system with the completion of M & N docks today. The standpipe is in service. - This includes the dock where ex -mayor Fahey's boat burned when she was in office. Hydrostatic test witnessed & approved Fire System permit #02-988. There is no practical requirement for a redundant fire supply line down the pier. The standpipe is made of high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe which is corrosion -resistant in the hostile marine environment. There is stretch to the line at firefighting pressures. The system is considered dry, yet is installed submerged under the waterline with standing water in the run. This configuration avoids freezing/im pairing pipe. The FDC for both docks is located on the float at the foot of the ramp. There remains one FD outlet to be striped to allow for a visual i.d. by responders. The fire extinguishers will be mounted tomorrow. A schematic of the system will be placarded at the FDC for our use. FM Message Page 1 of 1 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:36 PM To: Harrison, Marie Cc: Bullis, Ann; Smith, Mike Subject: Port Standpipe acceptance testing memorandum Marie: Here's the deferred memo to assemble with plans (after AB's approval) John 12/16/2002 Date: December 16, 2002 To: Building Department From: John Westfall, Fire Marshal9, Subject: Plan Check #02-505: Edr Standpipe System 336 Admiral W The Fire Department has approved the subject plans and provides the following for clarification regarding system acceptance testing: The proposal for installation of fire protection wet standpipe system is part of an alternative materials proposal submitted by Mr. Bill Lehner, FPE of Lehner Engineering on 1/30/99 (letter attached) for earlier phases of dock construction at the Port. The Standard for the Installation of Fire Protection Standpipe Systems (NFPA 14-2000) designates rigid wall metal pipe material for approved installations. Given the corrosive and hostile marine environment and submersion of standpipe gystem in seawater, flexible High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) has been approved for application on portions of the system below the water line. Because HDPE expands under internal pressure, an alternative means of hydrostatic acceptance testing is required. The procedure will include pressurization to 220. psi for a minimum of six hours. Hourly, the hydrostatic pressure will be brought up to at least 220 psi from the expansion and relaxed system pressure. Commencing the sixth hour, the system shall maintain 200 psi for 2 hours. Enclosure: Alternative Materials Proposal, letter dtd 1/30/99 from Mr. Bill Lehner. Cc: Mr. Gary Watters, PN&D Engineering fax (206)624-1388 Mr. Chris Keuss Port Director 336 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 City of Edmonds Sb Office of Fire Marshal LEHNER V 18009 Highway 99, Suite C1, I Lynnwood, WA 98037 — en ineenn 425-776-7616, Fax 776-8�77, lehner@aa.net FIRE PROTECTION SPECIALISTS File: 0158AItl.doc Job #0158.1 1/30/99 To: Bill Broz, P.E. McGOWAN - BROZ ENGINEERS 12828 Northrup Way, Suite 200 .Bellevue, WA 98005 Fax 425-646-9843 RE: ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS PROPOSAL Yort of Edmonds Marina Restoration Edmonds, WA Dear Mr. Broz, Mr. John Westfall, Fire Marshal for the City of,Edmonds, has requested that I prepare, certify, and submit a,formal proposal to utilize High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe on portions of the standpipe system on the subject floating seawater docks. The following constitutes this alternative methods and materials proposal, prepared in accordance with the 1994 Uniform Fire Code (UBC), 103.1.2 and the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC), 104.2.8: A. The source of the requirement for a standpipe system on the subject marinas is the 1994 Uniform Fire Code (UFC), Appendix 11-C, 6.2, which requires a "wet standpipe" system in accordance with (Uniform Building Code) UBC Standard 9-2 and UFC 1004. UFC 1004 also refers to the UBC Standards 9-2 (Standpipes) and 9-1 (Fire Sprinkler Systems), but the balance of this section does not relate to marina type installations. UBC Standard 9-2 includes about a half page of document reference revisions to (National Fire Protection Association) NFPA-14, Standpipe Systems, and then the full text of NFPA-14 itself. NFPA-14 refers to NFPA-13, Fire Sprinkler Systems, for some technical specifications. B. Pipe materials are specified in UBC Std. 9-2, Table 2-2.1 to be steel per ASTM A135,, A795, A53, or ANSI 1336.10. Ductile Iron per AWWA C151 ' and copper products are also specified, but not used on this project. Hot -dipped galvanized steel as specified in Table 2-2.1 is utilized for all piping above waterline on this project. Only that piping which is below water line is subject to this alternative proposal. C. The reason for this alternative proposal.is to utilize a product thlat is more suitable than steel to the hostile marine environment along the docks. Seawat4r, especially in the splash zone and the upper level of submergence, is very corrosive. It is capable of corroding galvanized schedule 40 steel pipe to a weakened condition, subject to operating pressure failure within 5 to 10 years after installation. i, D. The product recommended for substitution is High Density Polyethylene pipe and fittings. The specific products utilized are Factory Mutual Approved for fire mains with a maximum working pressure of 200 psi in underground (buried) service. Copies of the manufacturer's literature expressing Factory Mutual Approval are attached in Exhibit A. The apparent reason that this product is only approved for underground use is its increasing weakness with a rise in temperature, page 5 of exhibit A. , The intended use of this product is very similar to that of an undergrou ' nd service, in that it is submerged in about 6" of seawater at all times, where the ambient temperature varies from about 38 to 480F. on an annual basis. HDPE piping is not intended to be exposed to a fire environment.' E. The following comparisons to steel, the Code:specified product are made as required by UFC 103.1.2 and UBC 104.2.8: Quality (Suitability): The purpose of this pipe is to transfer water (500 gpm)'from ttie Fire Dept. Conn. (supplied by the responding fire engine),along the floating dock to a 2.511 hose valve (for use by the fire fighter). Galvanized steel pipe has an inside diameter of 4.026" and a coefficient of roughness of 120 (Hazen and Williams formula from UBC Std. 9-1). HDPE Class 200 pipe -has an inside diameter of 3.364" and a coefficient of roughness of 150. This equates to an overall hydraulic disadvantage for HDPE pipe. The HDPE will lose 1.6 times as much pressure due to friction as the galvanized steel pipe at the same flow rate. This means that a 500 ft. length of HDPE pipe will require an additional 21 psi of pumping pressure from the fire engine at a flow rate of 500 gpm. A pressure of 100 psi at the standpipe outlet will require a pumper pressure of about 175 psi with HDPE pipe and 154 psi with galvanized steel. 2. Strength: When new and not subjected to corrosion, schedule 40 steel is much stronger than HDPE pipe. However, a few years submergence in seawater, or frequent exposure to seawater spray causes corrosive pitting in the pipe surface, followed by rapid crevice corrosion. This causes dramatic weakening of steel pipe, which must be replaced to insure protection against failure during a fire incident. HDPE piping is virtually.' impervious to seawater and its corrosive effects and to attack by marine organisms. Its service life is well over 30 years (reference Exhibit B, "Chemical and Environmental Considerations"). 3. Effectiveness: This piping material is Factory Mutual Approved for fire service water main service if buried and thus protected from fire. By.being submerged, it is also protected from ' fire. It is manufactured to block ultraviolet radiation so that exposure to sunlight in shallow water does not cause deterioration. I have personal experience with its successful installation and service at Port of Port Townsend, WA, for over 6 years, and know that similar installations have existed in the City of Seattle for even longer. 4. Fire Resistance: This product, if exposed to a temperature of 100:�F., is approved for a service pressure of 170 psi, slightly below the normally required 175 psi working pressure of fire extinguishing systems. Its yield strength is approximately 50% higher at 255 psi at that temperature. Therefore, this is the factor which determines that this pipe material must be protected from fire wherever it is used as part of a fire extinguishing system. Its submergence. in seawater alongside a floating dock is the solution for protection from fire used in this instance. Is LEHNER V engineenn FIRE PROTECTION SPECIALISTS To: Bill Broz, P.E. McGOWAN - BROZ ENGINEERS 12828 Northrup Way, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98005 Fax 425-646-9843 18009 Highway 99, Suite C1, Lynnwood, WA 98037 425-776-7616, Fax 776-8577, lehner@aa.net File: 0158A[tl.doc Job #0158.1 1/30/99 RE: ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS PROPOSAL .Port of Edmonds Marina Restoration Edmonds, WA Dear Mr. Broz,, Mr. John Westfall, Fire Marshal for the City of'Edmonds, has requested that I prepare, certify, and submit a formal proposal to utilize High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe on portions of the standpipe system on the subject floating seawater docks. The following constitutes this alternative methods and materials proposal, prepared in accordance with the 1994 Uniform Fire Code (UBC), 103.1.2 and the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC), 104.2.8: A. The source of the requirement for a standpipe system on the subject marinas is the 1994 Uniform Fire Code (UFC), Appendix II-C, 6.2, which requires a "wet standpipe" system in accordance with (Uniform Building Code) UBC Standard 9-2 and UFC 1004. UFC 1004 also refers to the UBC Standards 9-2 (Standpipes) and 9-1 (Fire Sprinkler Systems), but the balance of this section does not relate to marina type installations. UBC Standard 9-2 includes about a half page of document reference revisions to (National Fire Protection Association) NFPA-14, Standpipe Systems, and then the full text of NFPA-14 itself. NFPA-14 refers to NFPA-13, Fire Sprinkler Systems, for some technical specifications. B. Pipe materials are specified in UBC Std. 9-2, Table 2-2.1 to be steel per ASTM A135, A795, A53, or ANSI B36.10. Ductile Iron per AWWA C151 and copper products are also specified, but not used on this project. Hot -dipped galvanized steel as specified in Table 2-2.1 is utilized for all piping above waterline on this project. Only that piping which is below water line is subject to this alternative proposal. C. The reason for this alternative proposal. is to utilize a product that is more suitable than steel to the hostile marine environment along the docks. Seawat6'r, especially in the splash zone and the upper level of submergence, is very cor,rosive. It is capable of corroding galvanized schedule 40 steel pipe to a weakened condition,' subject to operating pressure failure within 5 to 10 years after installation. 2 5. Durability: This product, HDPE, is composed of extra high molecular weight materials, providing outstanding wear resistance to sand, coal, mine tailings, and other abrasive slurries. These properties work throughout all the pipe material, inside and outside. Therefore, abrasions against this pipe usually go unnoticed. Although this pipe is suspended below the dock walers and inside their outside edge, at rare times a boat could be backed into the dock in such a manner that its propeller could impact this piping. Such a boat would have to be quite small for its propeller to contact the piping which is about 8" below the surface. Such a boat propeller is not strong enough to disable the pipe, especially since it is also flexibly installed. The' wall thickness of 4" HDPE is 0.568". A cut 0.134" deep will reduce its effective wall thickness to that of Class 150 pipe, which has a service pressure of about 175 psi at 400F. Steel piping, after a few years and exposure to corrosion, is vulnerable to fracturing from such a propeller impact due to its greater rigidity. 6. Safety: HDPE piping is certainly as safe for fire fighting operations as is steel pipe, provided it remains submerged and not exposed to fire. It is not subject to weakening and ;unexpected failure due to corrosion over time. Additionally, because it deforms elastically ,(stretches) under pressure, it absorbs water hammer more readily than does steel pipe. The present design with small pockets of air above the large volume main provide additional surge chambers to absorb water hammer. Another advantage over a deck mounted dry standpipe system is that most of the HDPE system is already full of fresh water. This provides water to the fire fighter more quickly and with less water hammer than a dry system. 7. Sanitation: Sanitation is not a factor in this alternative methods and materials proposal. The possibility of seawater - or other contaminants backflowing into the public water system is notaffected by the proposed standpipe arrangement, since it is a closed, high pressure system. I certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The hose connection between the fire dept. connection and the float piping supplying Docks C & D is not included in this alternate methods proposal. Exhibit A (attached) represents details concerning the Factory Mutual Approval of HDPE piping, and Exhibit B (attached) represents information about the resistance of HDPE to sunlight and corrosive chemicals such as seawater. Please call me with any questions you may have. Respecfully submitted, William B. Lehner, P.E. Fire Protection Engineer LEHNER ENbNEERING 0158AItl.doc I "I Westfall, John Subject: 02-505 Port of Edmonds Start: Fri 12/13/2002 10:00 AM End: Fri 12/13/2002 10:30 AM Show Time As: Tentative Recurrence: (nohe) Meeting Status: Not yet responded Required Attendees: Bullis, Ann; Gruwell, Meg; Chrisman, Lyle; Westfall, John Reminder consolidated review due, no meeting required. Thanks MI Message Page I of 2 1, `3 -5,4 Niu'14�L . � Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:20 AM To: 'Hank Bynaker' Cc: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: RE: Port of Edmonds Marina Signage Hank: That makes sense to me. Thanks for the information and improving Port safety. Please call if I may further assist. John ----- Original Message ----- From: Hank Bynaker [mailto:hbynaker@portofedmonds.org] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:17 AM To: 'Westfall, John' Subject: RE: Port of Edmonds Marina Signage Hello John, Thanks very much for the info. I'm going to incorporate the two items you mentioned into our sign. On the other issue, my recollection is that all installed fuel tanks in boats must be grounded to a grounding plate or disk in contact with the water. Some older boats have a black iron tank, but most boats now have plastic or aluminum tanks. Grounding is required on all of them. It is supposed to prevent a spark when refueling. At this juncture, I'm not planning on including anything with respect to cell phone rUse while fueling. Although I suppose it is possible that a spark could be generated by a cell phone, but quite frankly, I'd be more worried about some of the higher powered VHF marine radios, especially older ones with relays for switches. I think most of the problems will not appear so long as people exercise care and caution while refueling and follow some simple rules like turning their engines off and turning on the blower to ventilate. Again my thanks for your help John, as it is much appreciated. Best Regards, Hank ----- Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John [mailto:Westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 5:25 PM To: 'Hank Bynaker' Subject: RE: Port of Edmonds Marina Signage Hank: Very interesting about the cellular phone use. I have heard of some urban legends about cell phones igniting vapors at fuel filling stations. I know of no confirmed incidents locally or anywhere else. There are also stories circulating about fires caused from filling fuel tanks in truck bedliners. This could have been cause with the voltage potential variation above in the flowing fuel and below the insulated liner (ground) and creating a spark. Tell me, are some fuel tanks ferrous metal and insulated through the hull from the "ground" potential of sea water? I suspect if they are metal they will be grounded. 4/4/2003 Message Page 2 of 2 May I suggest for the signage that you add the last two points of the UFC signage to your existing signage? It looks good! John ----- Original Message ----- From: Hank Bynaker [mailto:hbynaker@portofedmonds.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:47 AM To: westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us Subject: Port of Edmonds Marina Signage Good morning John, I am reviewing our current signage on our fuel dock and would appreciate your recommendation as to how our new signage might read. I have included the text out of the uniform fire code you faxed to me for comparison. Our current signage reads as follows: 1. Stop Engines 2. No smoking or open flame permitted within 50ft of fuel dock 3. Do not overfill tanks or allow fuel to enter waterways 4. Do not leave vessel unattended 5. No moorage allowed on fuel dock The uniform fire code reads: WARNING NO SMOKING -STOP ENGINE WHILE FUELING. SHUT OFF ELECTRICITY. DO NOT START ENGINE UNTIL AFTER BELOW -DECK SPACES ARE VENTILATED. One thing I think our signage should include is something to the effect of, "Cell phone use prohibited while ftieling." Please contact me at your earliest opportunity at 425-775-4588 or by return e-mail. Thank you very much for your help with this John. I want our signs to be the best they can be. Best Regards, Hank 4/4/2003 D1r% L-URT OF E D M 0 N D S 336 Admiral Way - Edmonds, WA 98020-7214 - (425) 774-0549 - (425) 774-7837 FAX January 18, 2002 To: Edmonds Fire Dept From: Port of Edmonds Dean A. Kelley, CMM Marina Manager Re: Tier II report As per Title 11 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act 1986 1 have enclosed a copy of the Port of Edmonds' Tier Il report for your files. If you have any questions please contact me at the Port of Edmonds, (425) 775-4588. Page I ' of I pages Form Approved OMB No. 2050-0072 Facility Ident calon Owneir(OP811101-14 - aT 10-5- Name or Name I Phone 7757-J2W Tier Two Street MailAddress EMERGENCY city iEjP-,4,WS County State L444 zip 7'(0.2-0 Emergency Contact AND HAZARDOUS SIC Code qq 3 Dun & Brad Number CHEMICAL Name Title INVENTORY P hone '77S Lyr-&t 24 tir. Phone 4 FOR FID _# Specific PFFICIAL Name JiO' Information jJSE Date Received Phone 24 H.r. Phone by Chemical ONI-Y Important: Read all instructions before copipletingform Reporting Period From January.1; to December 31, 19 11 Checl� if inforip.ation PP!P�y I§ i4poN.Pa! IQ th.9 i0pripOgn �Omig ol; yeair. Physical S stprogg C;)Oq§ iiiind Locations a Chemical Pescription and Health .1n.ven.tory U) (Non -confidential) C .2 Hazards 2! 0 it, IL E S 0 (check all that apply) rage Locations Trade CAS. Secret Itr r1re Max. Daily Chem.Name 61', S., J,Q-e— I I Sudden Release kmount (code) of Pressure Reactivity Avg. Daily Amount Check all that apply Pure mix Solid Liquid Gas EHS Immediate (acute) (code) EHS Name Delayed (chronic) s- I No. of Days On -site (days) Trade CAS Secret j*-6re Max. Daily SV Chem.Name [I Sudden Relea se ___T_7F1 Amount (code) F 0 7 of Pressure Reactivity Avg. Daily Amount e Check all that apply Pure Kx Soiid Liquid Gas EHS Immediate (acute) (code) EHS Name. Delayed (chronic) No. of Days On -site (days) Trade CAS Secret Max. Daily Al Pye Chem.Name M .0 1 IS I I Sudden Release Amount (code) of Pressure I Reactivity Avg. Daily Amount Check all I Woo� I I I that apply Pure f4x Solid Liquid Gas EHS Immediate (acute) (code) EHS Name Delayed (chronic) FTT-x a_j No. of Days I On -site (days) Certification (Read and sign after completing all sections) Option I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted 'in Paws through 2- andthatbased I I have attach9d p site plan�� - on rDy inquiry of those inkidu2iS responsible fyVbt@i'ni*ng th�Flf rmation, I believee submitted/' ffa. s true, accurate, and co pi t I I have attacheq a list 6 site coordinate abbreviations A Ile-y I) I have attached q cipscription pf qil�es an.0 other Name and official fitle of owne//operdtor OR c Sigiraiture- —7- Date tigpdd safegua 04 mowrpq authorized representative I 1 page �-_ of 7- pages Form Approved OMS No. 2050-0072 Facility IdentAlcition Name Owner/ to ame. Name V ?= j Phone 7 7 horr C ;, .4u/S Tier Two Street 3 3 A -44-" tr-eL I MailAddr'ess 33(. di,,yd EMERGENCY City 0 Iff County State 41A- zip 71(0,7-o Emergency Contact AND* HAZARDOUS SIC Code �Pq 91 Dun & Brad Number CHEMICAL Name 1) 0- 41 #% ka lle-V Title Arresi-a Akqpeo- INVENTORY Phone q0,4- -7-?X-7-7jjS- 24 Hr. Phone I FQR JID# Specific OFFIC!4 -Received Name Title formation In 0§9 f5ate Phone 24 11r. Phone by Chemical ONI-Y Important: Read all instructions before completingforin Reporting Period From January I to December 31, 19 11 Check if information Pelbyy 19 iq@p§q1 to 09 inf9rrq.qpn p4milim 10§1 year. Physical C Storogo Codg§ and �oc;itions 1i Chemical Description and Health Inventory a 0 a. cc (W-Ponfidential) C Hazards C& D E 0 L CL (check all that apply) I Storage Locations CAS Trade J-15ire Max. Daily Al Chem. Name )erre, Sudden Release Amount (code) of Pressure I Reactivity Avg. Daily Amount Check all I I I I I I W I I that apply Pure Mix Solid Liquid Gas EHS Immediate (acute) (code) EHS Name Delayed (chronic) I j 1 6 1 !�' I No. of Days On -site (days) Trade CAS Secret Fire Max. Daily Chem. Name I Sudden Release Amount (code) of Pressure Reactivity Avg. Daily Amount Check all that apply Pure Mix Solid Liquid Gas EHS Immediate (acute) (code) EHS Name Delayed (chronic) No. of Days On -site (days) Trade CAS Secret Fire Max. Daily Chem. Name Sudden Release Amount (code) of Pressure Reactivity Avg. Daily Amount Check all that apply Pure Mix Solid Liquid Gas EHS Immediate (acute) (code) EHS Name Delayed (chronic) I No. of Days On -site �ciays) Certification (Read and sign after completing all sections) Optional A# n" I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitt d OW ough .21 andthatbased I I I have atta0eq q Site plap. on nq ry of those i vid?,jis responsiffbl for obtaining the information, I believ a a submitted inf 2nes acc urate, and co plete I I have attached a list of site coordinate abbreviations IK i d I I have attache.4 a.wScriptipp of diKes and other Name and official title of own /operator OR owner/operator's Si ure Y. natp safeguards Mpasurp4 authorized representative I i -� 56 N/Lf I k4L- K) Y. EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT CAUSE DETERMINATION REPORT SNOCOM INCIDENT NUMBER FIRE/EXPLOSION CAUSE: # EF 00-3025 ARSON Tuesday, October 31, 2000 6:10 Occupant name: Port of Edmonds, Occupant phone: (425)0-0 Location: 456 Admiral Way Owner name: Dan McGrew Owner phone- (206) 542-5570 FF injuries: 0 Civilian injuries: 0 Deaths--O Occupant Insurance Co.: N/A Agent: Charles Blackburn Owner Insurance Co.: Allstate Agentphone: Same Estimated loss: $5,500.00 Fire department alarm time: Fire officer: Investigator notified: Fire investigator: Police: Police officer: Steer/Roth Photographs: Westfall 610 hrs Arrived:617 hrs Capt. Marc Petrella 610 hrs Arrived:615 hrs John Westfall, Fire Marshal # EP 00-26632 Notified: 610 hrs Arrived:612 hrs Evidence: NOT APPLICABLE INVESTIGATORS CONCLUSION: Arson fire identified from physical remains of boat and scientific method used to eliminate all accidental sources of heat production within area of origin. DISPOSITION: Open, active WEATHER CONDITIONS:Approximately low 50's F., overcast DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: 1976 20'Bayliner Boat, registration (WN5330JE), BIN (BLBA38LB087). Boat built with fiberglass hull & wood framing members. The boat was powered with a single gasoline inboard engine and drive. Aft of the cabin was a canvas cover which enclosed the rest of the deck area. A photo of owner Dan McGrew and his boat is attached. EXTERNAL EXAMINATION: Boat docked at slip M12 in central docks at Port of Edmonds. The bow was facing north into the slip and was tied on the starboard side. Boat was m ' ost burned on port (pier/outboard) side near to waterline. The boat cabin had been reduced from fire to a level at the top of hull. Hull shows "V" pattern aft of cabin area. The boat was extinguished by suppression crews and did not sink. At the slip area, the outboard auxiliary engine was recognizable at the bottom from the surface. The outboard engine had been mounted to an aluminum bracket which had melted and failed, allowing the engine to drop to the bottom. A red polyethylene 6-gallon gasoline con er which Fire Origin and Cause Determination Report Edmonds Fire Department Fire Marshal 16 John s all 3-36, POM-A4L- L-'-,Y Westfall, John From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 5:09 PM To: Fire Officers Cc: Taylor, Kevin Subject: Scuttling a Boat 11/16/00 ABC Schmitt and Officers: Lyn Gross just advised the Coast Guard received information that the owner of a boat moored at P dock may try. to scuttle it. Apparently, it is an older 26' Fairliner berthed between the Nea and the Sugarfoot. Port Security person Andy was notified by me at 1705 hours. Lyn notified SNOCOM who notified EPID prior to that. I advised Andy to contact both the Coast Guard and the EPD. We could have a hazmat problem, or no problem because nothing may occur. The proper law enforcement authorities have been notified. TT 1i F.D. 2000-106 NOTICE DATE: September 18, 2000 TO: ALLPERSONNEL SUBJECT: PORT OF EDMONDS PROTECTION ISSUES In concert with Fire Department requests following last December's boat fire and subsequent shift input regarding Port emergency responses, the Port has met our requests for better sign - age and identification to aid Fire Department responses in that area. For "N" dock only (south of Port Office), attempts to repair the broken standpipe as a result of the fire have not been satisfactorily accomplished. The "ell" where the dock takes a turn had been replaced with PVC pipe, which will not withstand our operating pressures for use. Up- grades to all dock utilities for "N" in 2001 will include replacement of the existing standpipe with approved HDPE pipe. "The gate for each dock will be provided with signage identifying the docks served and their in- dividual length to assist the IC during size -up. The dock length will be measured along ap- proved walkways from the sign location (gate) to the end of the dock(s). " Note the slip identifica- .tion signage on the right.' F.D. 2000-106 "Gritted white or reflective striping will be painted on the dock at standpipe outlet locations for rapid identification." Thomas J. Tomberg Fire Chief Pull Date: December 31, 2000 By: FM Westfall Date: To: From: Subject EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT February 151- 2000 Ch. Tomberg, AC Taylor, Capt. Schmitt B shift members. prepared by Lt. D. Oftedahl I.D. MARKERS AT THE PORT OF EDMONDS After completing our wet hose drill at the Port of Edmonds on Feb. W we had a discussion on potential scenarios that could anise and how they could be handled. In discussing these scenarios, one common denominator stood out. And that was identification. Here are some examples: 1. Hydrant location (map book) 2. Fire Department Connection location for the dock standpipes. 3. Which dock/docks a re se* rviced by which FDC. 4. Location of standpipe connections on pier. 5. Length of each pier. A suggestion was made that would make this *information easily accessible to any engine company responding to a fire at the Port. Have signs giving this information placed on the top rail of the fence directly *in line with the actual FDC down on the dock. ' The sign would have a red back ground with F D C across the top. The second row would have the letter/s of the dock/s that that particular FDC services. The third row would show the length of the each dock. Another suggestion that would enhance ID would be to identify the location of each standpipe out on the docks. That could be done by painting a red hydrant on the concrete deck or by placing a blue hydrant marker on the deck right in front of each stand pipe. Or do both. Dennis Oftedahl, Fire Lt. Date: To: From: Subject: I EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM April 28, 2000 Port File Fire Marshal Westfall Various Port Issues Present: Tomberg, Westfall, Deputy Executive Port Director Chris Keuss, Port Maintenance Supervisor Bob Yeager. Damaged/Impaired Fire StandpiQe, N Dock: N Dock was the scene of December 1999 boat fire during which the standpipe system failed. The break occurred at the 90-degree turn on the L-shaped dock. Yeager will repair the break at the 90 degree-L. Yeager requested a pumper test the repaired section for evaluation and acceptance. Approximately one year from this date, utility upgrades to M and N docks will include full replacement of the existing Steel/PVC system with approved HDPE standpipe construction. Fire Department Identification and Signage The gate for each dock(s) will be provided with signage identifying the docks served and their individual length to assist the IC during size -up. The dock length will be measured along approved walkways from the sign location (gate) to the end of the dock(s). FDCs identifying the dock(s) served will be signed. Gritted white or reflective striping will be painted on the dock at standpipe outlet locations for rapid identification. Standpipe outlets will be striped with reflective material. Port Multi -Purpose Boat Keuss provided a manufacturer's flyers on public safety rigid hull vessels (SAFE Boats, Pt. Orchard). This information will be forwarded to FF White who will identify FD needs and specifications for a vessel. The Port is willing to consider EFD needs regarding length, accommodations, etc. Lengths of 20', 22', 24'and 27'feet were mentioned. A brief mission description identified fire suppression, fire pumping capability, rescue, law enforcement body and evidence recovery, towing, a cabin, room to treat patients in a shielded area, equipment storage, and protecting patients and crew from the elements. The Port would retain their work boat for in - Port activity. Keuss asked EFD to generate field trips locations to see multi -purpose vessels. City of Edmonds Sb Fire Marshal 10 Wesffall, John From: Sent: To: Subject: '3 3'C. Schmitt, Bob Friday, May 05, 2000 5:01 PM Westfall, John Port test A, ry 0 M I Ali� ""4 FYI, we attempted to test the system today but the 2 1/2 hose/standpipe connection broke about 4 minutes into the test (at 200 lbs.). Bob was with us and will let you know when it is repaired. Wesffall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 5:14 PM To: Schmitt, Bob Cc: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: Port test I need your help during the day when your schedule allows. Bob Yeager has completed standpipe repairs on N dock down at the Port. This is the dock where Mayor Fahey's boat was berthed when it burned, and the standpipe system blew. We agreed we should test the system with an Engine. I'd like you to call or meet up with Port Bob at 425 774-0549 and bring the engine down. Provide a practical standpipe test by pressurizing the pipe to 200 psi for: 10 minutes. Letmeknow how things go Thanks. Lo .0i MEMORANDUM Date: April28,2000 To: File From: Fire Marshal Westfall Subject: Port Meeting Regarding FIR System 336 Admiral Wy Chief Tomberg, Chris Keuss Port Facilities rep, Bob Yeager Port Maintenance Lead, and myself met this date to discuss pending issues, as follows: Dama-ged/impaired fire standpipe at N dock: N dock was the scene of December'99 boat fire at which the standpipe system broke. N dock is an "ell" -shaped pier. The break occurred at the 90-degree turn. Bob Yeager will repair "ell" section of standpipe system presently, requesting FID pumper hydro test for acceptance/evaluation. Approximately one year from this date, utility upgrades to M and N docks will include full replacement of existing Steel/PVC systems for approved HDPE standpipe construction. Fire Department identification & signage The gate for each dock(s) will be provided with signage identifying dock length to assist IC during incident sizeup. Length provided will be measured along approved walkways from the sign location to the end of dock(s). FDCs identifying the dock(s) served will be signed. White or reflective striping will be laid on dock at standpipe outlet locations for quick identification. Standpipe outlets will be striped with reflective material. Port Multi-i)uri)ose Boat Chris provided a manufacturer of rigid hull vessels. will identify FID needs and specifications for a vessel vessel length, accommodations, etc... cc: Chief Tomberg information will be provided to FIF White, who . Port is willing to evaluate our needs for City of Edmonds Sb Fire Marshal CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0215 * FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT 1"7 C. 1 SWI March 14, 2000 Bill Toskey, Executive Director Chris W. Keuss, Deputy Executive Director Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, Washington 98020 i Dear Bill and Chris: Thanks for the opportunity to meet on Wednesday, March 15 at 1000 a.m. I wanted to briefly outline some of our issues to facilitate tomorrow's discussion. Upgrading the standpige system. The standpipe system serving docks 1, J, K, L, M and N requires updating per the 1997 Uniform Fire Code. During our Port drills on February 7, 14 and 21, we identified a leak in the new standpipe system at the base of the Fire Department connection (FDC) serving docks E and F. Emergency Equipment Storage Shed. We understood a storage shed would be constructed adjacent to the Fuel Dock building to house the Mustang survival suits worn by Firefighters whenever they staff the boat. Flare Off. The Flare Off event, coordinated with the United States Coast Guard, is scheduled to be held at Marina Beach on May 20 as part of the Waterfront Festival. Portable Fire Extinguisher Live Fire Training. You have received Fire Marshal John Westfall's letter regarding unsupervised fuel dispensing training for Port employees dated February 24. Marking Critical Public Safety Features. We would like to explore ways to identify critical public safety features of the dock system that would be of great assistance during emergency incidents, particularly at night and under adverse weather conditions. These recommendations stem from our experience fighting fires at the Port and our most recent series of February training drills. 9 Paint Fire Department Connections (FDC) with reflective paint. Paint a 3" to 4" stripe across the dock at the location of each FDC and/or mark each location with a blue reflective hydrant marker. Indicate which docks are served by each FDC and the length of each. Please see an enclosed copy of signage posted at each dock entry gate as an example of what would greatly assist responders during fire fighting operations. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Jap6n SUBJECT: Port Meeting March 14,'2000 Page 2 Port Boat. We would like to see a new Port boat purchased to enhance the ability of Firefighters to safely perform ' water rescue and extinguish boat fires. We broach this subject recognizing the City has not budgeted for either of these purposes and that funding and maintenance costs would come from the Port. Nevertheless, we feel we have an obligation to identify shortcomings in the current emergency response system and to make recommendations to improve the fire and life safety of Port users and the rescuers who come to their aid. We believe the current Port boat provides a good work platform for the type of activity required by Port employees, however, it has deficiencies when used in a rescue or fire fighting role which includes: 1 . Drop bow 2. Lack of handrails 3. Lack of shelter to protect rescued victims and crew from hypothermia 4. Lack of lighting 5. No fire pump to deliver suppression water from the Sound side of a burning vessel or in open water 6. Under powered 7. Deficient navigation tools under adverse weather conditions and darkness 8. Lack of protected storage (would not have to construct shed for Mustang suits) 9. Lack of a tow bit and tow bridle 10. Lack of working space exacerbated when rescue victims are taken on board or a I backboard is required to transport an injured victim 11. Restricted gross carrying weight of 1,500 pounds 12. Lack of access if the single Port boat is in use or unavailable The Fire Department would like to see the Port of Edmonds acquire a fire and rescue boat that is available to Edmonds Firefighters to train on and respond to emergency incidents in the Port and outside up to a reasonable distance. The Fire Department is not interested. in a trophy vessel equipped with the latest bells and whistles. We are interested in a safe vessel that is functional and. gives Firefighters the best opportunity to suppress boat fires and rescue people in distress. Thank you for reviewing this information prior to our meeting on Wednesday. Sincerely, Thomas J. Tomberg Fire Chief Enclosure