337 3RD AVE S (2).pdf. . . . . .. . . . .
up
VED -
CITY OF EDMONDS
BOARD OF ADJUST�IENT
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
FILE #
-DATE
FEE $25.00
REC'T #
HEARING DATE:_j
APPLICANT: G're A DDRESS 3S'7— .33S-- 3 �P-95"'o PHONE:
Indicate type or degree of interest in the property:
O�C.
PHONE: 77
D D R E S S .2 3 R Lg_�- _g ais- �'4 2,
LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) 33 7�: 3 S eD L9A01y4-5 W& 9S 6-26--
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: .2 3 ;2
,40 AA01-7-1,0,V 7-2�> _,�IWO�YQLS 9Cz,11APj&C Z22 -7-,Vlg Z1WAr_"aJ9XQ
USE ZONE:_RM il
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKEU 6 APPRUVED,
By Planning Department
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: �2� '(4001'e6a
VARIANCE REQUESTED: /M
A~o 4770%4V A E61A-.1A&r2_,
STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
ATTACHED: &�2�s -7- !?jW ,w
.9&14p- C04-1,WrD 6,4kP0 7S 0,V
Z2�1x_ &ArA A-7- Al L Zle-
45�2 A.0 04- -81-.P!2 - A.0 MOIN IIV6: A/,
STATE OF WASHINGTON) Ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the -State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared G-eoNe 0 Who,
being duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (s)he has prepared and read the fore-
going statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true,
and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes
therein mentioned.
-77
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of filzul.n/
19
residing at
N�pdry Public in and for the State of Washington.
an
. N �`� ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT I:, —
POINT 1. The following are the special circumstances which apply to my property
which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity under the identical zone classification.
ZP7710W 101V0 P,19'IV 11Y 7�;Vls .4 110f,4 IIAOX 7�VX_ A,0P,4,,0Y7A6-t1,_ 01
;FkWFW7- 4
1111D�PI'014'4 L_ 0 WIYFp S 0 IV-D 0 =c
4- 7 - S-0 'P
/0 n�r 1116 /,V/ Z),�,ro k- cvw je" I-$ 6'Y a 7 --S'O
POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in
which my property is located because:
'V_Pe'V7SVoQ e47AgArn� Sh�oyA_D 8—gr A&DRA- -Q&M a/
7WA A/ -r,4 ff - PIXW jg�_Ce2 C-_ F--,O �2,5/6/ 1r,,4 '72'�",r jr�o,;Q 9
,h,O- 7-19 / MCIY r-A 4� �ro 7WC- AlleX-1 6 _ZzAVA IIVT-V �2 /00 S ;770 77AE 4,00 &E-k 77C-C
Z&- 7W AC ///6 INI 7-1.�l 4 Al V epli-'01'y 6�
POINT 3. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will continue
to the owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond his control because:
011S 9421I.PlWa- /.S 7-4> RX Ae7ADj5 IN7-0 A AVPQ�S; SaC_��
_AVxJ- 6-?,C gvplw'r_� oej2k I PAO 7" r' &We9 77 D"
e 6 2�_Kxj-R_ .4 4,7-0�- ",V^4 '7240 . 5;n�-"
7722V�IW A_/Ozy) 4K S &,114 / 4 AZ /V 7-,VQ *Y tO / A- A- IA�e
J �QAZQ & A5� r14,5:� 7 q X .6 A,5_ 9
944
POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this
variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause in-
consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone
in which I am located.
Z)rir,eZ_ 7--,qA-r 7-#X 15-7WW-0ARZLV AIVZ> CIQI-rg�IA Of yj�c'
406OL-D DO
'J/V Ty.
7-4 X A61)Sgir D 129�- -7-o CeW "PS;/,*/V' A S' .4 4olYoo PA I.-V/OA-17 -
r 40W,4-P ADq"&Z 7-0 AIVIZ 6,VVD1-r101'VS -7'-,1-10 'ROARI)
QV5 -Mr
-7 21VT tQoLl�-D PRESCILIGG I-)IVJ) ZW41-50 o4'7
ings of Fact by Board of Adit" ment
Record of .,d
Th e Board of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of
File No. V� request for variance at
? the following:
1. That notice was given according to Code requirementso, and Affidavits attesting to same
are in the file.
2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/krre,—� been met.
3. In addition theretos
4, Therefores the'reqUest for variance iseeTdt*/Granted9 subject to the following special
conditions:
5.. Section-12.16.110 "----and I if a building permit and/or occupancy tr-rmit is not obtained
-for the subject property within one year from the date of the Board's decision, the con
ditional use permit or variance shall be automatically null and void.---"
6. Decision shall be effective on:
0
(Date)
DATED: j V� i er 7 Chairman, Board of Adjustm#ht
DATA
-7-1 nat.p nf 11parina
Date of Publication: 7 IF Continuances:
Date of Posting: 1P
Date of Appeal from Decision or the Board:
Y—M, oa �
got,
go
F
eAOWA*P,.r A094S4
L 0 W
Igloo —
I
7
goo, go. .,,g
Wow '10004, Iwo
it
vocw i-factigit,
.4 g000gm,,g
gootootigg000, ArrA .,,e ArfusO d
goo, I. go.
r
9 to PP M 4 M ods 7 te) It
joi; TOZ
A
L
4
d
4�
L
L
2WWA PL&I Je. 4T%UP ALOW4 PPACK WALL
I go . . k.]
g,,00gool. goggoboggoo,gol,' "gogg ..,g, ..�ggggg,
go. lo"o,
e6go
g,
.0 INA
a
IF
I goo, 0
go
11 to goo"
go IF �I( i
go. I %ols. go� I goof c
6 L
t tt toof 1 4
It JU
I>
Ito
go
I
goggo,o go -goo, googgoo,o goglogol V6 17
t
joruw*APACTMENT 15 d
T
GROUP 14 % 20
OZ bTOQ %e vuls vs6prr Logo.", ...... L
1pfirg Ova W COw-bT*4
FIM ZNE s
4
r
7T.
17 1
go
MwCM WU 744r5 13
Lam
+-L�gggggoggggggpoggo :ozo� o" 2,
Ot
go 1
IOU 1
Oset got
Li .1, go
T, io
gg�gg.
p
4
Ito 0
.4
.*.4 *.0 no
I go X
�gg ,,.o go. M.— og 1'. m Agogg =i4=
"'goo gog o,
.4g-gggg!!ow11o*
go
.7
d
V.
go logo ...... smomig gow,mg ampoggoo
'of it 15 1
" I I go --- I .. u
x Pogo g4
ah
Jt
1A
to
I- lot
1. d
got I
I googgoodp go-o,p. i!.
411io go. gg� go — LIN
cl goo
too.
lit
d,
go
)IF
M
4. .
�o go go go
go
go
to go 20ge
rr -
151" 0
4 AVI PLm
.050 612 rx=r
go
WAomp7m
7:1 14 0
1 go
8. g, go I go
1* go Igg, ..0
go
1ggggggdgg..gggggggggg�
4o
goo
LJ N I T A P A K?
go 7;r7 3X-Ap 6-6
go,
3 Boo 0 Ito ccoog. I
X-pmoutoy,ar, Am 0 Vrtnalcgr
F
L
L- III
1 0
MMMMMMMM IMMIMMIMMI MMMMI
41
TN
%r7lAgr
00
ol
7y
I-MM-M,
IM -M-.-MIMMM IM.1I
No Rr 14
F
AAD"---- -- ----- M. ........
MMM,--I I., III-
MI-IMMI, ML - - - - - - - I - - - M, M. M .
AO 7. Coj
Me
zp
- ---------
q;w; 4
64
f
............. I I... .--MM9M,M.M,
'IM
p
ip
111 0
I III Il I I I. M--- MIMM.
I,MM
K T
5
I I p
, topo".",
k
/Y
ry
,RON u oe
0�
A
Al� 09q I 1w
tj
a 18 RD PS
j4 4040ow 04 .4y.. 11
j!� Tto FA
io.
07
pa 02 412 w ivy
AlArOrP. jmmOP/ S4 kCV*&V, 45%
'1 12
Fp
4v
pl t4 f ao jq 11 o,6 MAI* *4
TIHM 14C.WA 11 J)ON4JOYAi -0414-4#e�
PJ6 A1,W14:*q OY, 404 lY fW 4V IOC^ U) #4 YWAZ
FPA4,0
Ij
e0A
p
A sqp
4
NAfU
ILI
o�L- *3 L6 c I 40P 0 OQ Al 1. A .. ....
DO a 0
ALV't'
4RfA pet) pe _D
A O�j 7
Lo A Z6
W1 ALD14
ILI TX
ILL
If I
I d at
pill MIRL'o. M'y
'S
4
�eeso;ovl
kN6:
Wit s
KAM MA 744Jb,'A If W4,
it
If
.1 d
ILI
ID
ON
N%V
�111 I
e�CALs
I
I
4
A IV
If
rjA
0
Lap
71
ts
14t
Lit
-,4
NZ.
-------------- d a%Q-Lq, 7,
-9"Vap-no -rr am -AV
J.j t !!.:,r
1.7
asp-
;HYAN 7)iQ %A
C2 1-11 -A 1 -2 v zi I -I -
6,v �57-52 YcV(I�� IY-,Y c7dW-52 (T �J 5
410azz
1-T
tivF
6--
0
le.
p p t
pe
'emseelpeope,
oe
lool.opleelool leellefool
or orf ol
I oe
loll
a Illor 0 F p Loa 0
b 46
L q -- ol
loof oll Oro
p74j4r:) 2@1
lee "0
A
Atoll ol
tj I,
low.
leel
olooloole�eemelool 66 ell,
.1. ell
71'
ole ell
lej .01 1
1. me L:
le
le. ollooloo. Cl
l ee! L.e.
p 1 .1 4 .3. le-
ZNL
lee
elle,
lee.
e -'o
le
moll4w
p
le" le J4
I el L
pe 1 k
lea
olel ell
el
-ell"ll el
'l el
ell
Ot le.
. low-11
"lool I
Noll
Ilra - 6-e- f el
'P h .
10
le P heirele-ol q je To I le.
ol. k el,
Lille% le,
epes
e of.
ele le.
0.
de
two
le.
%
At
lee
l< eo
0 lope
p p
e. p d 4
lope low del
Lille le, o: rr o;
a.. Lee 'L
4
—ol "I
lee
elle-el e. P* Ile,
ol . — . : - -
le 4"'W "l i
lop,
k
p t
ell I I- 1p
.rL"'
..4 mol qp L
I fell's rd
'96
111111"dom
1 0 lel.
ol, — I
lee
so
+ k pe
"Willem
eloo,
or oloole, I
p
ell :0 oo. 'eI, -V
d '.A 4 Ill e or
eell I
eloolool
ed. I.
"el
L
low
el ell de
le
L low L
L all
lee L � I
lee
oll Il ell .0foloo, lee to LL
ell
lee
0
All I Fee f
ell x "In
d
+
Il
l P .0, :o'
le
lee eroji. I..
el : * "
L
olel 11 ' 1 0. . .
I I I
eloof
loll
L Lae
WA 5 loll 67061 k r V. "
+
ol
/� /?/,// I
.d
or
08 m"MOMOMI
000�l
s�w. 9(y '"Ito
c rm - '. I
a44:w-w%M6 -:7 -�N* ff; q7.
Q
oo -
4, ttoo I I.
oy 60
0000VW117C�l J�IX7—,I
I.. o I ion"
w IV
: jl�
.4;m
d
db�
N
Moo,
ITT
So
odo,,
I
o I .
W(O"g
14 t-
-o
... ..... .... ....
opoo, opmoo.. woo.
ool '0
%I Jo- d -7
oI
000�
fro If -
F I. moo I
--Ap
mf ,-
oo, oo"o-
lob
ic
Ills -
-"orl
oo
tL
T
IIII'Io I
..j
of.
to
sq! So* ,
- 0000%%
oI0000000�z
17 .......
opoI
or.
00
71
od'000d,
omm00000.
to
IIII,op
No
olk,
j
ow,
owl
I.. o'I' '.o-
pit;
ft
or
1,o t
,oI
pp
x A.
-t
sof,IIIA
oot-
oo, oot.
oot
to
to
so
It
--I Ile
116. %L
p
Ila
C;
IT,
T'l
s I ;; 4: w A
I F
Ai
MAIN
'13 TOP
iI
0 ,
a
soot a '10
0 *10 0 0 *seat
000
DAYTON
r� A A-
W4 I pq I ORM I a [� 4 pop
MAPLE
UJI
L ,mI,
13TH
6
z am
H�09NINOM
Q 0 WC3 'g
INFI L v
it: 1�1
40
:99
Y.
-it
8:
Wo.
to r
JA I
77.
-M, m 4"L Tw aww
X%n Iva$
h44"422 rfA vj&�
w4ft
Awrims; wag
It lips
. tSZ
I A
4
it
11 -1 oil% !If
T4:V7 MIX 'a W.0
I'" saw
is
M%kwww sr
. . ........
ILIA
NVI 0
NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION
FOR VARIANCE - 11111,1 It"111""ALMM
BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Said hearing,will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment
and all interested persons are invited to appear.
IRENE VARNEY MORAN
City Clerk, City of Edmonds
FILE NO:— V-1-78
PUBLISH:— 1-4-78
NJ
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Notice of Hearing Petition
File NO.1-1-78 —
Rose Sellers , being first duly
qworn on oath, deposes and states:
she
Thatybe is the legal clerk
of the Edmonds Tribune Review, a weekly newspaper.
That said newspaper is -a legal newspaper of general
circulation and it is now and has been for more than
six (6) months prior to the date of publication here-
inafter referred to, printed in the English Language
continuously as a weekly newspaper in Edmonds, Snohomish
County, Washington, and it is now and during all of the said
time was published in an office -maintained at the afore-
said place of publication of said newspaper. That the said
Edmonds Tribune Review was approved as a legal newspaper
by the Superior Court of ' Snohomish County, Washington.
Court Order No. 38282.
That the annex is a true copy of a legal notice
as it.was published in a regular issue (and not in
supplement form) of said newspaper once a week for a
period of 1 consecutive weeks9 commencing on the4th day of
January 3P 1978 , and ending on the day of
3P . 19—, both dates inclusive, and that
said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of the aforesaid period. That the full amount of
the fee charged for the foregoing publication in the sum of
$ 2e56 —, has been paid in full, said charge being based.
on the rates allowed by statutes of the State ofWashington.
SUBSCRIBED AND
SWORN
TO
before me this
4th
day
of
January
19 78.
/ /' J.
NO P IC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Lynnwood
'HE 'Rl",�,71
. i
TERESTED PERSONS`.TH
"NOTICE IS HER .01
EBY GIVEN TO ALL IN
PUBLIC HEARING WILL. BE HELD BY THE��"
y,�
11 F: �;�A NZ
ILED FOR...
I TION: HAVING BEEN;F
....... ....
, ir do,` a,; 0
ek
M. ... . . . . . . . .
IOPEERT.Yz� DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS: ........ ..........
i'A
It,
, 1, - . . , r.
4 tic
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
)N EiCLASSI FICATION:
aaaw
0 a
TIME�
1 4
ERS OF THE EDMONDS,CIVII
IE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMB
;1, BELL'STREET. ANY PERSON,' INTERESTED AN "THI
ENTER,:�"5th AVENUE AND'
IN OPPOSITION TO IT.� COMMENT
ROPOSAU'MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR )R,: AT:-.':,TH
ONCERNING.:7THE APPLICATION- MAY BE SUBMITTED.,, PRIOR: TO C
NAL INFORMATION' MAY' B
IEETING ��.IN PERSON OR IN WRITING. ADDITIO I
1 11 J 1i 227). 1 N
IBTAINED'AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 EXTa%1. TH
VENT," THE � AGENDA IS.NOT COMPLETED ON'THE ABOVE DATE THE�;PUBLI
THE'.NEXT. REGULAR MEETING AT,JHE�.SAN
1EARING WILL BE CONTINUED T01�.
4
'IMEP'AND PLACE. _;4 i,
.AP
PUBLISHED..
-ILE NO.-V ......
"4' ; ' ' :., I
The removal, mutilation, destructiono" or"it
concealment of this notice prior to the date.ki,
hearing is a misdemeanor punishable"'-;
of the
mprisonmen
by fine an
I
n
1 64---- .. J
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
Mary Lou Block being first duly sworn,
on oath deposes and says:
That on the 6th day of January 1978 the
attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance,,
and in any event, in the Post Office and Civic Center, and where applic-
able, on or near the subject property..
Signed
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
19
Notary Public in. and for the'State or
Washington residing at
January 9, 1978
RECEJVEp
101 9 1978
MEMO TO: John LaTourelle, Director
City of Edmonds
Community w*, Dsp�
Community Development Department
FROM: Leif R. Larson
Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: AGENDA FOR EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING
FOR
JANUARY 18, 1978
The following is our comments on the subject agenda:
V-67-77, CLYDE DIMMICK Refer to previous memo
dated
December 21 1977.
78 GEORG
V-1- E A. DELLER Th e will not
e varianc
create
a safety problem,therefore, we recommend approval.,
V-2-78, FRED BRYANT No comment.
NU-1-78, JOHN LARUE No comment.
WJN:lv
.... . . .....
ER'S VARIA14CE REVIEW FORM FILE #1---,
PLANN_
APPLICANT:
ONING:
ADDRESS:
VARIANCE REQUESTED: —
ZONING CODE REQUIREMENT:
OTHER PERTINENT FACTS:
VARIANCE 4ERI TERI A - Section 12.16.100
.1. Does this amount to a rezone? 1, \ .,
2.(a) Are there conditions and/or cir
lands in the same district?14
(b) Would strict enforcement of�the zoning cuut ucPllY- -- —
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district?
special conditions re�,uiu [[%Jill V.—
hardship� and,practical dif
4. Are there unnecessary
provisions of the zoning code?
-% . X. - a .
5. Will the granting of the variance De
of property owners in the vicinity?'
cable to other
welfare
sible the reasonable use of land?
6. is this the m-i-,Imum variance that will make pos
-- \J ierally be in har n,y and compatible with this
7. Will the granting of the varia ce ger
zoning code?
ko At,� Leo
Planner's Vari-ance Review 12/77
Ill
sv
CITY Or- 00PADMOS
I 11"Irl, WIA-HINGTON 98020 a 12 1775-2525
HARV9 H. HARRISON
MAYOR
;W
I-JVJ�- %-Cll CK
COMMUNITY DFMLOPMCNT DF-PARTMGNT
DATE:
January 30, 1978
TO:
George A. Deller
23800 74th Avenue West
Edmonds, WA 98020
4,
TRANSMITTING.
Board of Adjustment Me eting.Minutes
V-1-78
T,
AS, YOU REQUESTED':,
FOR YOUR INFORMATION:
x
AS WE DISCUSSED:
'FOR APPROVAL�
T�
FOR YOUR FILE:
REVIEW AND COIZIENT:
N
COM4ENT AND RE, TUTL
MINUTES OF 'MEETING:
1-18-78
REMARKS:
PLANNING DIVISION
EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
January 18, 1978
The regular meeting of the Edmonds Board of Adjustment was called 'to order by
in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center.
Chairman Al Bailey at 7:35 p.m.
PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT
Al Bailey Paul Roy Mary Lou Block, Associate Planner
Ed Robinson Charles Dibble, Mayor's Admin. Asst
Ken Hovde
Harold Hatzenbuhler Ann Derleth John Wallace, City Attorney
Clerk
Alice Stole Jackie Parrett, Deputy City
Gary Visser
Bill Leraas
Chairman Bailey welcomed the audience and explained the functions oi the Board, the
procedure for handling of the he arings, and the method of appealing decisions of
-the Board.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
es of the regular meeting of December 21, 1977 had been distributed. MR.
The Minut SER, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 21,
VIS
LERAAS MOVED, SECONDED BY MR.
1977 BE APPROVED. 'MOTION CARRIED. Minutes of the Special Meetfi ig of December 28,
1977 were distributed just prior to this evening's meeting so their approval was
postponed until the next meeting.
CORRESPONDENCE
Mrs. Block reported a letter had been received from Clyde Dimmick, applicant in
V-67-77, the first item on this evening-'s agenda, requesting a continuance to
MR. HATZENBUHLER MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LERAAS, TO CONTINUE V-67-77
March 15, 1978.
TO MARCH 15, 1978. MOTION CARRIED. Mrs. Block advised NCU-1-78 had been withdrawn.
AGENDA
V,:l 8",� GEORGE�,,!A.�.,��;DELLER Variance;of.15' from required 20!,lrear yard setback
at' d,:Ave S. (RMH)
Mrs. Block said the Zoning Code requirement for this area is for a 20'
rear yard setback. The applicant proposed to construct a cover for
rear parking spaces which already exist in this area. The property
Ave. There is angle parking to the front and side of the
abuts 3rd e site,
building. The 7 parking spaces in question are to the rear of th
adjacent to the alley, and the applicant wished to cover those spaces.
Mrs. Block displayed a slide of the alley and the parking spaces in
question. The cover would end approximately 5' from the alley. Mrs.
Block said this would not amount to a rezone and the building had been
in existence since 1968. The owner intend s to change the property to
condominium use and wants to cover these parking spaces for the new owners.
Mrs. Block said oth er properties in the area must provide for the same
do covered parking. The conditions
setbacks, but many apartments provide
did not exist because of actions of the owner, as the building was built
by a previous owner. Mrs. Block said the Zoning Code allows parking in
this ar ea but prohibits structures from encroaching into the setbacks. Strict
adherence to the Zoning Code would preven t the applicant from covering
the parking. Mrs. Block felt that if a cover were built under certain
conditions, it should not be detrimental to the other property owners in
the area. She said these conditions should include provision that no
interfere with traffic maneuverability. She felt the requested
posts would
variance would be a minimum variance to a ilow provision of covered parking
on the site . and, if properly developed, the use should be in harmony
with the Zoning Code. Her recommendation was for approval, but with
roofs to be cantilevered as much as possible so as not to cause the
posts to be close to the alley. The public portion of the hearing was
opened.
The applicant said he felt his proposal would be for the betterment of
the new owners who will be moving into the building. He said the alley
was a deadend alley and he did not believe problems would be created by
the construction of a roof over the parking. His application had indicated
he wished to build covered carports or garages , and he was asked to state
which he intended. He responded that he intended to do as described by
Mrs. Block in her presentation. The public portion of the hearing was
then closed.
The applicant was asked if the alley was used as a turnaround. He replied
that it was not; that, generally, only his tenants used it. He said the
heighi of the roof would be as dictated by the Building Department. Mr.
Hovde noted that the building sets back 2716" from the property line. He
said a 241 turning radius is legal, even if the columns were right out at
the edge. MR. LERAAS THEN -MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HOVDE,'THAT, IN VIEW -OF
THE -FACT THAT PARKING -WILL BE THERE ..REGARDLESS OF WHETHER'OR.:,NOT1,.THERE_1IS
A,.CARPORT,i:THAT V-1-78 BE APPROVED BECAUSE HE FOUND IT;:MET, . J.R, C R I ITERIA
FOR -A VARIANCE'AND'BECAUSE IT�PROBABLY-WOULD,_ENHANCE THE,,':NEIGHBORHOOD TO
-BUT THAT:�RESTRICT,ION,:SHOULD��BE
'HAVE XCARPORT:-INSTEAD-OF.OPEN PARKINGi THE ROOF BE CANTILEVERED AND
MADE AS SUGGESTED BY THE CITY STAFF --THAT
THE POSTS BE3HE MINIMUM�DISTANCE'FROM THE MAIN WALL OF THE.STRUCTURE TO
PERMIT AS MUCH TURNING RADIUS AS IS POSSIBLE. MOTION -CARRIED.
V-2-78 FRED BRYANT - Variance to allow 16-unit apartment on 38,440 sq. ft. of
1 area at 7815 218th St. S.W.' (RML)
Mrs. Block said this was a density question and she did not feel a slide
of the area would have been of any particular valuet so she did not show
est was for 160 sq.ft. from the area required
one. She said the variance requ
for 16 units. The Code requires 2,600 sq. ft. for the first unit and
1 unit. Area required for 16-units would
2,400 sq. ft. for each additiona
ft. Mrs. Block
be 38,600 sq. ft., and the area proposed was 38,440 sq.
said this would not amount to a rezone and the special condition was the
proximity of the area available to the required area. She said the area
available was so close to the required area that strict enforcement would
deprive the applicant of commonly enjoyed rights, and the lot configuration -
to purchase by the applicant so they were
and size were established prior ven the size of this property, she felt
not a result of his actions. Gi
it would create an unnecessary hardship to develop the site for only 15
units, and she said the site would accommodate the additional unit without
difficultyas far as parking and required amenities were concerned. She
felt granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the health,
safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and that the.area being zoned RML
ential for high traffic or congestion that a higher
.did not have the pot
density zoned property would. She felt the increase by one unit should
not be detrimental and that the overall development would be similar
with 15 or 16 units. She said it would be a minimum variance to make
reasonable use of the landt and that it appeared that granting of the
variance would be in harmony with the Zoning Code. The amount of the
tely 7%, which was under the 10%
variance requested was approxima cations in the past.
used by the Staff as a criterion for evaluating appli
She recommended approval of the application . She displayed a diagram
of the plot plan. In answer to a question, she said she had arrived at
the 7% figure based on the fact that the area was sufficient for 15.93
units. She said the applicant was short 10 sq. ft. per unit or a total
of 160 sq. ft. total for the whole site for 16 units. The public portion
of the hearing was opened.
EDMONDS BOARD OF -ADJUSTMENT
Page 2 - January 18, 1978