410 WALNUT ST.PDFIiiii iiiiiiii
13721
410 WALNUT ST
ADDRESS: L11D
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTLJRE):Z?5q
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
11
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: 0 Conditional Waiver 0 Study Required [j Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:—"- No�, 9.3 ��—be V-324 -TIA7 .10k
DRAINAGE PLAN DA
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER):ADOO&
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:.
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OT HER: �Qu ) 8-1 1 L5 (6m)
LATEMP\DSrs\Fom1s\Street File Checklist.doc
4
PLANNING DATA
Signs
STREET F=ILE
Sign Colors..
Proposed: (XrVU, rtZ44 OL Ct kle— M d, .1 19 1 A Ct--
A�qeptable? RequiresADB A.ppr?val Ql-,-
SignLocatia;n
If freestanding and 34eetb*'r-' dv'er (Un"le' s.s a fence) meets, setb6cks? N 114
'Re Setba�ksF'
Street: Sid —e.-
I Rear
10, Side:
-Da,qtun (W-) C
Actual Setbacks
Sid Rear:
Street: e: Side:
Landscapifi4'&iFreestandin
Size: NIA- Location:
Critical Areas Determination M
El Study Required W
El Waiver
el Other.
Plan Review By: ri a., Ucc. i a--
PLANNING DATA
-- Signs --
7=FI7LE]
Name: W Ll I V1 LA t 6J'ye&' C,0 f ff,42.-
Date.'
SiteAddress: 41D Walvlut Sty-eei-
Plan Check #: 51,D 7.00(o - 0-i I (P
Project Description: PN3P-(,-HV%-!3 CCJJ0jVJ4t-t W6QJ 5i3V1 W1 01 LAVIA
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES /a
Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan Designation: DOV,/Vl-fv" rK4',y-fd Czm rra4-""* 4-k9,
Map Page: -Corner
Lot: (YES / CO)
Flag Lot: (YES / 60))
ADB File # (or date waived): AdVV11vYL"PyTWe- OW-V�P-.I-oo(o
TOT e of
ALAreaperTyp -Sign
Type of
Sign
Allowed in
zone?
Matrix
I
conditions
met?
Allowed
area per,.
unit
, Uni t
TOTAL
sign area
allowed for
this sign
Proposed
sign area
Example
wall
wAnternal
illumination
Yes, with
conditions
Yes
-*N
I sq.
fUlineal ft.
attached
wall
41 ft.
attached
Wall
41 square
feet
20 squ are
feet
Sign #1
WaLl
VV/ f V1 ic'm I
jJILAWL-
W,
W /
'e
b $
1 Loo
JU0
1 (0
2.41
-2 .4
Sign #2
do
Sign #3
TOTAL Sign Area for TenantlSite
Max Permitted: (P
Previous Total:
0
sed Total:
[Propo.
Sign,Hei4ht
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
14'
Actual Height: C' (C et V'CL 0
+ 2.01 P
Sign Type: Max Permitted:
Actual. Height:
Sign Type: Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Lighting-,
Sign Type: vo� r-ti V, LW 41�
Proposed: jVVJCMAJ (�JLAWJ
Allowed in Zone:
Sign Type: Proposed: Oovl A�ft L.V*)
Allowed in Zone:
Sign Type: Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
ov,
0V--
0 LLi
=:) cr
cc:
;__ z
C/) 0
z —
0 F-
0
0 LU
>_ CL
z
LL C:j
0 z
t2- <
r,
REMOVE EXI"
PROVIDE NEVj
PER EDMONDS t
15VAO I "
IWTO "
Per4lu-T
'I*
CD
j= LU
LLj
0 a:
U_
CL
CA
cr-
>M
0
LU
BE
u) LU
LU
3t cn
LU :z
n
Lni
0
C13 F=
Ul
�-- W
C)
IN
Cd C-)
LU
I
11=
CL
0 a_
CL 6i I
M
co
0
..I �E :Q �s
Q ,
0 a V) 04 C)
.
G SIDE ALK C
— — — — — —
EX. PARKING STALL
cn
SIDEWALK AND CURB
(2ox8)
WALNUT STREET
ETAIL E2. AND E2.8
EE PAGE 3
EXISTING 2 0' SIDE WALK CUT
5� CONC S ID E WALK
I
IST CLEA N OUT
"u'
S' CONC SIDEWALK
Provide striped 36"
J-JENTRANCE EXIST
OUT TO MEET
qLY SIGN
wide min. access Path
to si walk
;ENTER
NSI AND WA
#8
�11
,!:i
Cn
Uj
C_')
1<
23—
U:)
CM
M!
Eno -
;o WALNUT STREET COFFEE
(no change to footprint) EX. ONE
ALLEY 410 WALLNUT STRET WAY SIGN 07
.C)16'-0!' 20'ONE WAY #6
ACCESS LANE
L
os
I EXISTING BUIL IN
�O �14O
�NE;D 4
R SIG 0 E 9 #4 SITE Nbns:'
1Z
Replace all side walks per city inspector
-Provide traffic impact analysis for change from
'TE NOTE*
Lay a i I :ne
R e P' Ce a' ' S ' d e w I k S P e ' C ty sp clo r
Pro," cle t ra f f c , mp a c t a n a I ys' s for ch ange from
florist to coffee shop
03 V r, S we 0 t, r nnin )-ork...
ONO WH -Verify side sewer location before beginning work
i
No record on file with the clty.
-Verify location of water line
— — — — — — — — — — — — — Pov, P w.te , st�rn
-Provide RPEIA at water system
I
ri existing sewer clean out.
'E ST �TMS
121.71'
di
Uj
W
CD
0-
C:)
cc
a_
cn
UU
C-)
9
cio
CM
;a
S2
1.
LU
LU
C�=
It-
r-
SITE. PLAN
ft
z
0
C-)
Uj
0
z
0
0
co
cm
C=
C=
cl�j
e
ell
LLJ
LU
C/3
. Aaep APPROVED AS NOTED
APPROVF-D BY PLANNING BY ENGI EERING
!u,,sua.nt to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.60.020.M:
ly illuminated signs in the downtown area and neighborhood commercial areas may only light the
letters. The background of a sign face may not be illummaled.
Intemaily illuminated signs in the downtown area shall not be permitted to be higher than 14 feet in height.
.. - —.11 -- 1-1 - 1. 1. ..W. '— ... — — .... ...' ...— ."Y
Picture not to scale
FC-01ors.
Customers Color
Dark Red
F�.'.',_LWhite
Block
Actual Colors TBD
Specs:
Fabricate one Double sided no- illuminated marquee sign. Sign is fabricated
from aluminum, PVC and H.D. Density foam for dimension. Custom made
bracket for mounting out from building. All colors to be determined by customer.
AJI lettering Is 3-Dimensional, coffee cup Is carved from H.D foam to give a look
of a real cup with a radiused surface. ,
N*
W6110(0014s-
V1 M 1) V'J �eo( +D � L/), vl'C4 C?�'
V VM I V1 V VVI �G W �A -(;u V-
k4
ex?CVV11�71 00
RECEIVEM APPROVED
Customer has reviewed drawing and has
approved for production.
J U N 15 2006 Signature
Colors may not be represented acuratley from sup4ifflIPPRUARTMENT Dat
0 EDMONDS
10 =are property of Russell Sign Compasty and may not be reproduced in nyway vAdvxd
,t from Russell Sign Company All Proofs are for presentation and = approval orgy. Address. 410 Walnut St. Edmonds, WA980M
RtWbSML Artwork and designs are subject to a design fee. Contea. Pam ShAer 206-914-17S3
Sales: D. Russell Designer-, A
NW119140111 5629 208th St SW Ste. H Lynnwood, WA 98036 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.SSM I F;Z--,- --- I
STREET FILr,
11� in �o
1.5"=lff
0
k111`Pl'V71A I-AIA1, J' 4 A I J�" A I - 1/-% 1 A I / I' 1h - -
U
0
------------------- W 24r)67-re
............ L62
CITYCIFUMONDS
WIDINGIDEPAWRAENT
APPROVED DATE
BLDG. OFF10AL 1,6^ AP 1 1.
UMBER
Any request for modification, variance or other
administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance")
must be specifically c alled out and Identified.
Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions
which do not comply with city code and for which a
variance -has not been *specifically identified,
requested and considered by the appropriate city
official in accordance with the appropriate provision
of city code or state law does not approve any items
not to code specification.
STREET FILE
J U N 15 2006
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
V", DATE RECEIVED
, L(e(f
[PERMIT
EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
PERMIT
NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
"".(
V1 j, I tv"
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
L
PLAT NAME/SLIBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO,
[14 A
r V"4
I
W MAILING
ADDRESS
LID FEE $
z
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Approved 13
RW Pe rnii Required 0
0
EXISTING —_ PROPOSED
Street use Permit Required
Inspection Required C3
CITY IP
TELEPHONE
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT.
Side�alk Require
Underground 13
_
W.,,.q,equ,,.d C3
NAME
METER SIZE LINE
SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PFIV BEQUIRED
U
/I-
2
YESJ� NO 13
W.
1= ADDRESS
0:
I- I- � c)
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLJDRAINAGE
Ix
Lu
A 0 r-_jv, pff�uxf_-'
W
z
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
41 n I
/_1 -
jl)� vt- 1� �
cyls 4-5/vi oloil _fiNku
z
L"
NAME
9
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE
cc ADDRESS
RECYCLE REVIEWED BY DATE
U 2
di/I
M
CITY ZIP
0
TELEPHONE
PUBLIC WORKS REVIEWED BY 6ATI
X I A 'Ptil) TE
STATE LICENSE NUMBER E PR TO
CHEWD BY
FlFr REJ,�*ED B DA TE
Uj
cr
z127_121 =_0 71
A^
-j PROPLFIT� TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
4
VA�IANCE 0 CLr
SH%RELINE OR ADB#
INSPECTION
REO'D
SEPA
COMPLETED EXEMPT
W �cv (_ /— i '� 5,— () o
J
/ —
13 YES M'NO
I
I
V--'
,
NEW
RESIDENTIAL
PLUMBING MECH
CA#
WAIVER
ZONE
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PROPOSED
HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
ADDITION
COMMERCIAL
'OMPLIANCE OR
13 STUDY
Ne
19
MIXED USE
CHANGE OF USE
LOT COVERAGE
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
REMODEL
MULTIFAMILY
SIGN
ALLOWED PROPCSED
FRONT SIDE REAR
FRONT UR SIDE REAR
/VC .
�RADNG FENCE
0 REPAIR CYDS [:] x FT.)
FT1
z
z
t
PA K IN
PARKING
G
LOTAREA
PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
OTHER
DEMOLISH El TANK
P OV
9EO'D PROVIDED
R
'7
cGARAGE RETAiNING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER
ER"
ARK
REMARKS
M
CARPORT ROCKERY FIREALARM
(TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN,
CIL
fRE
Ex
U
w NUMBER
NUMBER OF
OF
M STORIES
0
DWELLING
UNITS
TYPE OEFWNSTaUCTION
C7DE
OCCUPANT
GROUP
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
SPECIAL INSPECTION
CONSULTANT
OCCUPANT
.�YYF
I Mt4l20rr An- J-D 12,F-41n
13 YES
REQUIRED 3
LOAD
REMARKS
GEOTECH REPORT
C0
".- CV15'L -S T7 �67 14r,57V-Mil) Tb 7>�F_
BY:
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Y
L 721 J\J) 1467
1 N
De§c'ription
FEE
Description
FEE
Plan'Check
State
Surcharge
HEAT SOURCE7'
LOT SLOPE%
VESTED DATE
Building Permit
City
Surcharge
PLAN CHECK NO:
06 — 01_�Ii�>
Plumbing
Base
Fee
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
Mechanical
1<0
9 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
J
lz SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Grading
2 .-- ____
M PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(5)
W
Engr. Review
Recording
Fee
PERMIT LIMIT. SEE ECDC 19.00,005(A)(6)
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
Engr. Inspection
Plan
Chk. Deposit
U)
APPIL CANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS
Uj IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
Fire Review
Receipt
#
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
z ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
rile Inspection
Total
Amt. Due
.j DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANVWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION
LandscapeInsp.
1- -
Receipt
#
I HEREBY ACKNOWLE I DGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT: :No THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
THE OWNER. I AGRE. TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC.
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DVNG THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
FOR INSPECTION
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATIO N F TAE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
receipt is ack owledged in space provided.
WORKMEN'S %�EkSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27.
"i I I
�111
(425,
PF%l CAT E
f(66 OPAGENT):
6
DATE SIjNEDs
.I
I "'
771-0220
'. ('
EXT. 1333
ATE
ATTEN-T)ON
IT IS UNLAWFUL-TGIJSE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI-
FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 if IBC110 / IRC110.
ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW -INSPECTOR
PINK -OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
6/05 DD=QQ wAon -vinill ADIM RAAICIKlr-.A f%('10111=111Z
!M
In
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects
SITE ADDRESS: to Lim
ZONING: 8C
ALLOWED?:
USE(S) PROPOSED: A4
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED— (Y"
CUP File: To Allow What Uses?:
ADBFILE#:
PARKING: N
X 31, 36,5: It 3i,S (floor area, # employees, etc.) 2-3
Use: 47�43W39,5,2-) M-5- Z381j!� No. Spaces Required: 1 15-,z efr-4
X (floor area, # employees, etc.) -4. g
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. ' Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Total Required: -7, =P 7. Actual Provided:
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks: d-4- �4wrlp
0 Left Side: 6 Right Side: o Rear:
Front:
Actual Setbacks:
Right Side: Rear:
Left Side:
Front:
Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No)
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA:
Maximum Allowed: Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT: IVa kl*-�
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:
Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height:
Datum Point: Datum Elevation:
Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? If so,VAR#
LANDSCAPING: 00 "".-V
Matches AD13 approved:
Bid Provided? Bond Amount (100% bid):
CRITICAL AREAS #: NaAk
SEPA DETERMINATION: V-X"'Pe
SHORELINE REQUIREV: -
Continued ...
1Afibrary\^01andatNewComm.doc
z
0
0
z
DATE: PLAN CHK#: 04 - 33
NAME OF BUILDINGFERMIT APPLICANT:' PAwz,,-. 6.,A4.,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: VpAn!6. g
s ha . V
ADB FILE #: OR DATE WAIVED: A/vm,
,PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN.: cvx 4 7 A�— f. A, -q
e
"4 k-o-t. A-o P,-nk A6.rk- b,.,,
SUBDIVISION:
LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: A, -
REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? yet
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
1A1ibrary\^P1andatNewComm.doc
APPLICATION
for
The City of Edmonds SEDE SEWER PERMT
NEW CONSTR . UCTION C] REPAIRS EASEMENT No . ..........................................
kil
OV*rNER ....... .. ................... CONTRACTOR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERMIT No . ......................
ADDRESS ...... ------ .......................... LEG,,kL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BLOCK No . ............................................
NAMEOF ADDITION ..................................................................................................................
bqp -7-es-A--d or)
ma,� / 9?4
Approved:
DATE................................................ By ...
* e-sw*gmt -10 se- Lowm am
pw*w., FWA"
I/
SSTREET FILE WALNUT STF
EXISTING 20' SIDE WALK CUT
— on
ENTRANCE I' 5'CONC SIDEWALK
RDI IT TO MEET
NEW DO NOT
ANSI AND WAC NTER SIGN
ALNUT STREET COFFEE
(no change to footprint)
410 WACLNUT STREET #6
Tax#: 0 oq (12 (� c)o .-�PLANTER
Legal:
21-011
12'-O'l
C1\1NEW ENTER
ONLY SIGN
EXISTING LEVEL
BLACK TOP
EXIST TRASI- #1
��101,
#4
#3
#2
#6
#5
SITE PLAN fAM06 bk+w )�IVAR�6 121.71'
Scale: I" - �Sl
50�� 01-5 APPHUVEU AS
BY ENGINEERINg
Date:
OW -to e6j4s-w-j(m mm frr
"Vwgz WIDI* sj"wft(q>. PRPKK6
-"s
is VAOT lowim w
Zone —:I Comer -v/ Fla&_
Setbacks Required Actual
Front
Sides
Other
Heisht
EtffRANCE
ANSI AND WAC
< WALNUT STREET COFFEE
(no change to footprint)
410 WALLNUT STREET
Tax#: '2—jo $Z.3 o oL( 1 5
Legal:
co
0)
ai
w
21-011
APPROVED By PI-ANNING
EXISTING 20' SIDE WALK CUT
C1\ NEW ENTER
ONLY SIGN
'41W
F-XISTIN
BLACK I
EXIST TRASP
SITE PLAN
Scale: 1 " = 10
A??TP. T7 .
FIRE DEys,�,.—,vL&NT
NEW DO NOT
SIGN
PARKING SPACES REOT:
PARKING SPACES PROPOSED.
WALNUT STF
5'CONC SIDEWALK
. i2l.71'. RECEIVED
iR 25 2011
AENT SERVICES CTR.
'OFEDMONDS
I -
BARRIER FREE PARKING
FILE
CITY OF EDMOND
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
WORK
ADDRES
OWNE
APPROVEDDA7E-
BLDG. OFFICIAL:
PERMIT UMBER
City of Edmonds Building Depaftent
APPROV,�K,,P, DY
, -uAN
alp
CEIVED
MAR 2 5 2011
PMENT SEkCES CM
CrTY OF EDMONDS
'%py
4 sirntmolic 16 ve Locmvz CITY COPY
m 1PT-%vwz ?wpevry
zo
a?
m
w
ENTRANCE
ANSI AND WAC
WALNUT STREET COFFEE
(no change to footprint)
410 WAL L,NUT STREET
Tax#: (7 00
Legal:
21-011
EXISTING 20' SIDE WALK CUT
-% � Im - I - . IV110
EW DO NOT
4TER SIG14
12'-0"
B 1-011
C�INEW ENTER.
ONLY SIGN
EXISTING LEVEL
BLACK TOP
EXIST TRASP
#1
WALNUT STF
5'CONC SIDEWALK
#6
#6
(9, W/
, 0* Lq
#4
#3
#2
/Sj 121.71
j SITE PLAN VW
Scale-:'l NT5 APPRUVED AtSED
BY ENGINEER G
Date:-21-6-1WIL
o" -r6 ermirAm s7ftLs fer
PeDIAC60 Ubl* STWhiltb.
Zo . ne Corner !,,---Flag APaOVED 2BP�LANNIING
Z>
Setbacks Required Actual
Front 3-3( - 11
Sides k WALNUT STF
Rear EXISTING 20' SIDE WALK CUT
I ENTRANCE S'CONC SIDEWALK
Height
60
ANSI AND WAC
WALNUT STREET COFFEE
(no change to footprint)
410 WALLNUT STREET
Taix#: '2--7o,�:2 -
Legal: 3 o oLl V�5
2'-011
EW DO NOT FLuA
SIGN
i 4f)v All
#6
# 6
#5
$C�
C� NEW ENTER
ONLY SIGN
EXISTING LEVEL #4
BLACI�10, P 1,VEL) PS t4o"TED
Fpnu
BY 14INEERING
Q
IWO!EXIST TRASF
7
121'.7 V
REC
SITE PLLA.N-�-
-fA
Scale: I 10 ft 0 00-
PARKING SPACES REO'D,I., 6 4"i. �: EVEI
�10
PARKING SPACES PROPOSED.
A P P TP �' -07 F, D
FIP,E DRARTMFENT
BARRIER FREE PARKING SPACES:
3—,3c> —1
ENT SENCES CTR-
OF EDMONDS
'IDA
C)jzt
C=D
lei coi 6
CITY OF EDMONDF�T'P/lf
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
STATUS: APPROVED ENG20110308
I MM&F@ffi@kMWq TOM&
Permit Number: ENG20110308
Address of Public Use/Encroachment: 504 5TH AVE S. EDMONDS
6401 NE 18 1 ST ST 4B2
KENMORE, WA 98155
GIRARDIS & WA��T`S��EET COFFEE
4 10 WALNUT ST - -
EDMONDS, WA 98020
(206) 914-1753
GIRARDI DECK, OPEN SPACE PLAZA INCLUDING PAVERS AND STEEL LANDSCAPE ENCLOSURE, WALNUT STREET
COFFEE BUILDING.
STREET USE. Placement of any temporary or movable objects in any portion ofpublic space or City right-of-way shall
meet all code requirements as setforth in thefollowing chapters of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
ENCROACHMENT. Permanent structures encroaching upon any portion ofpublic space, City right-of-way or
easement area shall meet all Code Requirements as setforth in thefollowing chapter of the Ed7nonds Community
Development Code.
CODE APPLICA TION. Chapter 18.70, 17.65, and 17.70.040 of the Edinonds Community Development Code. All terms
ofthe adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as ifsetforth infull and this permit therefore is subject to the terms of
those chapters.
FOR THE TERM IN WHICH THIS PUBLIC USEIENCROACHMENT IS IN EFFECT, THE 0 WNER SHALL COMPL Y WITH
THE PERMIT CONDITIONS SET FORTH BY THIS PERMIT.
NOTE. The issuance of this permit is understood by the owner to be of a temporary nature, shall vest no permanent right
and shall he issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the City per ECDC 18.70.040. Applicant is
responsible to provide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later
than the 21st da ofJanuary.
y
INDEMNITY. The Applicant understands and agrees to hold the City ofEdinonds harinlessfi-om any injuries, damages
or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the
City ofEdmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense ofany legal
proceedings including defense costs, court cost, and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. In addition, the
applicant understands that helshe shallprovide and continually maintain during the term ofthe permit a ceritificate of
insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, andproviding that it shall be primary as to
any other policy of insurance.
THIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN
SPACE PROVIDED. Printed: Monday, Februar
Jxh ., ig III
RELEASED BY
F� FILE COPY
D#TE
I�Pw6t( Wd/ 4
pe"
F-] INSPECTOR COPY F-1 APPLICANT COPY
0
0
STATUS: APPROVED ENG20110308
-�!�CONDITIQNS
• The proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or pedestrian travel.
• Architectural Design Board Approval has been granted or the process has been administratively
approved.
• The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public.
• The proposal either benefits the public interest, safety or convenience (e.g., supports or protects the city
street) or is an accessory structure such as fence normally associated with residential use of the property
as fully complies with the requirements of criteria above.
• Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to utilities or frontage improvements in City right-of-way per
City standards that is caused by or occurs during the permitted project.
• Sound/Noise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt
from the noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00arn to 6:00prn on weekdays and
10:00am and 6:00prn on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the
noise originating from construction sites/activities must comply with the noise limits of Chapter S.30,
unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120.
• Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify
defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from
any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance fo this
permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirements of any
City ordinance not limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision.
INSPECTIONS
0 None
0 0
When recorded mail to:
City Clerk
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020 --1,21 Milli offil loll
201flO240650 5 PGS
10124120il 4:16�m 66 00
SNOHOMISH COUNT , ISHINGTON
SPACE ABOVE THE LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
Assessor's Parcel No.: — 9-10323oo413,670o
Applicant: &]� �ci &Wrd�
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
This ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between the
CITY OF EDMONDS ("City") and EA i
JV, c L (4 -�
("Owner[s]"), in accordance with Chapter 18.70 dY& Edmonds Community Development
Code.
1. The Property. Owner is the owner of that certain real property located at
S-b4 911 &1,, 5 k !+10 Mhf, ( W-vt 6f within the City of Edmonds,
Washington, Assessor's Parcel Number '5j�0�45-00
and more particularly describ d as follows 1 1 CAaad 2, CAMA ktj-e i 4 0 din
Jr, pke-f- 1)4 Lof 72 � a, I n (k -L , Q LAr IL Ni I C114L 12 14 Vf
V _,OM12
Te-o- ii —/Y-tvs ;L-1 1 41, ,uk 3 or
as described in Exhibit "A" attached h6reto and incorporated herein by reference.
1 2. The Easement. The City right-of-way adjacent to owner's property or an
existing easement used for (strike those that don't apply) [street, road, -eAey, tf4l, sidewalk,
b*epatb, pede,&#ian eas-OR4--t, slower, veffter,stafffl other
3. The Encroachment.' The Owner desires to encroach upon the public
easement and the City hereby covenants and agrees and grants it permission to Owner to
allow A Ile r� L. A 1A ,, 00 1A e—V9111- P 1171,2 -t& . = IA-44 i 9-,Y AkkNici
b U i id )v -14- 4 to L111i N e 44j&+ to remain in a porTion of
ri�i
the Cit� 1-of-lwa�/-e`asem'ent. -,� ja;ilal site plan, scaled 1 "=20', showing the location of the
encroachment is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference. This Agreement is
subject to the following terms and conditions:
- I of4-
0 - 0
a. On behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, the Owner promises to
maintain, repair, remove and/or replace the encroachment located in the easement
at their sole expense to the standards established by the City. All maintenance,
repair, removal and/or replacement shall be conducted solely at the Owners'
expense.
b. The Owner, on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns,
acknowledge that the City had no obligation to approve the encroachment within
the easement for the sole benefit of the Owner, and the)agreements contained
herein, provide sufficient consideration for the Owner and their successors and
assigns to maintain, repair, remove and/or replace said encroachment located in the
easement at their sole expense in perpetuity.
c. The Owner promises to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents
and employees from any loss, claim or liability of any kind or nature arising from
or out of its promises contained within this agreement, including any damage that
may be caused to the encroachment by the City's operation, maintenance, repair,
replacement or other work related to construction activity within the easement
This promise to hold harmless and indemnify incliides defense by counsel of the
City's choosing, the payment of reasonable attorney's fees and court costs.
Nothing herein, however, shall be interpreted to require the Owner to indemnify
the City from the negligence or intentional tortuous act of its employees, officers,
or agents.
d. The Owner'shall at the request of the City, promptly remove, repair, reconstruct,
and/or replace the encroachment at the Owners' sole expense. Upon receipt of
notification from the City that the City requires removal of all or portions of the
encroachment from within the easement, the Owner will promptly remove those
portions of the encroachment from within the easement area as required by the
City at their sole expense. If the portions of the encroachment required by the City
to be removed are not timely removed by the Owner, they shall be removed by the
City at the expense of the Owner, and the Owner shall reimburse the City for the
costs of removal of the encroachment and disposal of materials as well as for any
increased construction costs or consequential damages incurred by the City due to
the Owners' delay. In the- event that portions of the encroachment must be
removed to facilitate utility and/or construction activity by the City within the
easement or other requirements of the City, the Owner shall be solely responsible
for replacement of the encroachment at their expense upon completion of the
utility and/or construction or other activity by the City.
e. Whatever rights and obligations were acquired by the City with respect to the
easement shall remain and continue in full force and effect and shall in no way be
affected by City's grant of permission to construct and maintain the encroachment
structure.
-2 of 4 -
0 0
f The property owner is required to provide and continually maintain during the
term of the permit a certificate of insurance naming the City as an additional
insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any
other policy of insurance. A copy of the insurance certificate shall be provided to
the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 21" day of
January.
4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the parties with "respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other
agreements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter. This
agreement may not be amended except in writing in a document filed of record with the
auditor of Snohomish County, Washington.
5. Notices. Any notice which is required or may be given pursuant to this
Agreement shall be sent in writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid,
registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by other comparable commercial
means and addressed as follows:
kto the 002:
City Engineer
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
ff to the Owner:
which addresses may be changed from time to time by providing notice to the other party in
the manner described above.
6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner shall
not constitute a waiver of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or
render unnecessary City's consent for approval to any subsequent 'act by Owner. Any waiver
by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default
concerning the same or any other provision of the Agreement.
7. Termination of Allreement. In addition to any other remedy provided for by
law, the City reserves the right to terminate this agreement in the event the encroachment
negatively impacts or damages the City's easement and/or underlying utility systems or
violates any condition of service adopted by the City, at its sole discretion, as may be
necessary to prevent damage to the City's utility system, or any other public facility which
may be impacted by the Owners' failure to properly use the easement.
8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns.
Owner' agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to the
property, but any failure to do so does not invalidate this provision.
- 3 of4 -
0 0
9. Capacity. Each party represents that the person(s) executing, this Agreement
on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s)
thereby bind such party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this day
01
0
B
S,
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
M
I -a IV/
This day, personally appeared before me,
to me known to be the_p.Srson(s) who executed the within and foregoing document and that
(Lelshelthey) /5,e- signed the same as Q �islherltheir) free and voluntary act
and deed for theuses and purposes therein mentioned.
X-4
�tPublic
Typed or Printed Name
Q—/9
My Commission expires: 7 1
CITY OF EbMONDS
By: AA"
a .
QFNITTNITRING DfV-ISION
-4of4-
0
9
Owner:
P.-brick Qrardi
�?04 FlAh Avenue 5outh
�dmomk VVA 98020
(42�) 60�-2261
Lecial Pa.5cription; -
�OL5 1 ay� 2, and t�e north 157 feet of Job
Plock �, (Pl4mpic View, unrecorded,
3.51,
�"4'-
QR�
-
-. P. r-
504 Mi Avenue 5,
161
Umalc!5, WA 98020
1511
r ii;z
Nrkincl Area
-Z-
"ZI
ORN 5ite Plan
Fvkllom�, wA7
1� 9,0Z 0
-7E
X
0 0
rx'PTIMMM
ziv�—
. 1890
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT#: &A
j
BUILDING PERMIT #:
RECORDING #:
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
El Check box for Encroachment Including Artwork in the Public Right -of -Way
PROPERTY OWNER NAME: , VA4V I ( k 6 1' LA V d. i' Phone 21,(, —Cog -
PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS:. �;(A
C) VA d!>
BUSINESS NAME (for Commercial applications): �(A Vd, I' I A wt, (h uf W-4 e
BUSINESS OWNER NAME:
ADDRESS OF PUBLIC ENCROACHMENT:
-
'91 Fr" �fv I W Phone 2'0 6 - 9 1 C
ww'Alw. W. �' WWAVWW.�. wwww- wlwwwwwwwww= xwww.= �' ww'ff. �'W=w 0 W. �W�W. 2rff;V';VX
Permanent structures encroaching upon any portion of public space, City right-of-way or easement area
shall meet all Code Requirements as set forth in the following chapter of the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
18.70 STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
PERMIT ISSUANCE
An Encroachment Permit may be issued, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, City
Engineer or their respective designee, for permanent structures encroaching upon any portion of public
space, City right-of-way or easement area, if the structures are placed in compliance with the above
referenced Code Section and the following criteria are met:
I . It has been concluded that the proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or
pedestrian travel;
2. Architectural Design Board approval has been granted or the process has been administratively
approved;
3. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public; and
4. The proposal either benefits the public interest, safety or convenience (e.g., supports or protects the City
street) or is an accessory structure such as a fence normally associated with residential use of the
property as fully complies with the requirements of Criteria 3 above.
5. Edmonds Arts Conunission has reviewed the required materials and made a favorable recommendation.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ENCROACHMENT: (include total square footage of encroachment and give
specific location such.as, 5' west of face of curb and 10' south of c/l of driveway entrance)Oh VVA I V1 SbLee--+
C-1
-A S:\Engr\Fomis\Encroachment Application.doc
10/9/2007
0 0
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature, revocable by
the Cityper ECDC 18.70.040 and that no vested right is granted. Applicant is responsible toprovide a
c..
copy of the insu�Iince.'.'e�iiricate to the City at the beginning of each calendaryear, no later than the 21s'
day of January.
17VDEMNITY.- The applicant understands and by 1kis1her signature to this application, agrees to hold the
City ofEdmonds harmlessftom any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever,
foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City ofEdinonds, or any of its
departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including
defense costs, court costs, and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. In addition, the applicant
understands that helshe shallprovide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate
of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, andproviding that it shall
be primary as to any other policy of insurance.
CODE,4PPLICATION: By signing the application below the applicant warrants that s/he has read or had
the opportunity to read Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code and s/he
understands that all terms o
, f the adopted ordinance are incoiporated herein as ifsetforth infull and this
application andpermits therefore are subject to the terms of those Chapters.
SIGNATURE
Property Owner
DATE
******* DEPARTMENT APPROVALS ***** FOR CITY USE ONLY *******
Date Rcv'd: by: Cert. of Insurance verified by: -Date
.Public Works Approved by:
Remarks:
. Planning Division Approved hy:
Remarks:
B# Date
.Edmonds Arts'Commission Approved By: Date.
Remarks:
)*Engineering Division Approved by:
Remarks:
Date
SAEngr\Forms\Encroachment Application.d6c Revised 10/9/2007
R0___
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE "
F DATE (MM/DDrYYYY)
1 10-12-2011
THIS CERTIFICATEIS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATIONIS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER
GURRY & ROGERS INS AGCY, INC/PHS
811637 P:(866)467-8730 F:(877)905-0457
PO BOX 33015
SAN ANTONIO TX 78265
CONTACT
NAME:
FAX
,C —0457
Wo,Ext): (866)467-8730 A " No): (877)905
ADDRESS:
PRODUCER
CUSTOMER to #:
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC If
INSURED
INSURER A Hartford Casualty Ins Co
INSURER B
WALNUT ST COFFEE LLC
19304 21ST AVE NW
INSURER C
INSURER D
SHORELINE WA 98177
INSURER E
I INSURER F
I
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
I TR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
ALMLIZIUM(I
INSR
WVD
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFF
(MMIDDIYYYY)
POLICY' EXP
iMMIDD/YYYY1
LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
s 2,000,000
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
DAMAUE—T—ORENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
$ 300,000
A
CLAIMS -MADE F_x]OCCUR
MED EXP (Any one person)
$ 10,000
ADV INJURY
s 2,000,006
X General Liab
G
X
52 SBA VW7166
02/24/2011
02/24/2012
-PERSONAL&
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$ 4,000,000
AG
I PER:
1;ODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
s 4,000,000
:1,L
POUCY
ILIES
PRO-
JECT X LOC
$
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$ 2,000,000
—
ANYAUTO
BODILY INJURY (Per person)
$
—
ALL OWNED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
$
A
SCHEDULED AUTOS
52 SBA VW7166
02/24/2011
02/24/2012
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
X
HIRED AUTOS
-(.Per accident)
X
NON -OWNED AUTOS
UMBRELLA LL4B
HCLAIMS-MADE
OCCUR
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
AGGREGATE
$
EXCESS LIAB
DEDUCTIBLE
$
RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION
STITU
I 11TH
AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N
TWC
ORY LIM T� ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
s 1,000,000
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEF--1
A
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory br NHI
NIA
52 SBA VW7166
02/24/2011
02/24/2012
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$ 1,000,000
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$ 1,000,000
DESCRIPTIONOFOPER4TIONSILOCATIOIVSI VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedufa, ffmom space is mquiad)
Those usual to the Insured's Operations. Re: Wall Mount Sign, Flower Box and
Seasonal Outdoor Charis located in the City right of way; 410 Walnut St
Edmonds, WA as per street use permit # eng 20060145 and encroachment permit #
eng 20110308. Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured per the Business
,Liability Coverage Form SS0008 attached to this policy.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCEL LED
City of Edmonds
BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE
Engineering Division
DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
A UTHOR12ED REPRESENTA TIVE
121 5TH AVE N
EDMONDS, WA 98020
7a-z-
0 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
I
GU�R*Y & ROGERS INS AGCY, INC/PHS 10
le
PO BOX 33015
SAN ANTONIO TX, 78265
City of Edmonds
Engineering Division
121 5TH AVE N
EDMONDS, WA 98020
ACORD 25 (2009/09)
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDSWA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
-V.. I b ,
Friday, June 12, 2009
This Application has been accepted by the City of Edmonds for review. More information and changes may be
required during this process. The review target date is: Friday, June 26, 2009 "memo.
Your City Contact is: MARIE MMSON S I HEET PILE
AppUcation Number: BLD20090368
Project Address: 410 WALNUT ST, EDMONDS
1110 IDITY OWN 01 AlILICANT
WALNUT STREET COFFEE - WALNUT STREET COFFEE -
6401 NE 18 1 ST ST #132 6401 NE 18 1 ST ST #132
KENMOIT, WA 98 mm— ' WA 98155-
(206) 605-2261 E)d W206) 605-2261 EX.
-r FILrTfNmORF
ST r. i
REr
Work Description:
RESTRIPING LOTA TPARKING ALVACENT TO WALNLff STREETCOFFEE. r"01
STREET
Outstan(fing Iterns - at Time of Submittal:
OWNER EXEMPTION FORM
4
ecif
.. on,
kPPI HEREBY AC KNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVVERJEAD IMOIS MAPPLICATIO N THAT �kME )IN10 R ATIONGWENIS CORRECT
I
AND THAT I AM THE PROPERTY OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO
CS TA BUILDING PERNITAPPLICATIOr THECITY.
(OWNER OR AGOM PRINTNAME
DATE S
S THU, i ra w 6-- ent Services
To view up to date information about your application pleas' . t e d n
website at http://www.ci.ednwnds.wa.us.
ED
City of Edmonds
Permit Application Form
Form A
Site Address: 'NU VVA_YA1i,4AA- c)r Suite
Sno County Tax Account Parcel #:
Business/Tenant Name (if applicable):
PROPERTY OWNEft: PAAY1'J_* A Jv'Ak Y__d I'
191
MailingAddress: �K2
City:
State: Zip: V02S
Phone:
7 FAX:
d " J A)
E-Mail:vl�� 12,ARv,-�i'l F_ Z k
,APPLICANT/CONTACT:,. DSame as Property Own'er DSame as Contracto
Fill out the following information if "Other".
Name & Mailing Address:
City: - 9� State:
�hQ (A)
Phone: 4 FAX:
E-Mail: aAlMO LeW11
,CONTRACTOR:",.'-':"'-OSam6iiP��perty0wher ther (NamA� 1�7M
Mailing Address:
City:
Phone:
E-Mail:
State License Number:
FAX:
mon, z , , Ai =-/
City Business License No:
L:\TEMP\BUILDING\HANDOUTS REVISED IN 2009\20ff%&d3W handoutsTORM A.doc 5119/2009 1
or:-
f, � 0-Ne wt or-v'!/A'
�Per .' 0-*w.8ingidFarhily uple pt�
MA' pp,ication
ion El Interior Rembdc E]!96rage/Carpbrt� Re
Adl�it' pair,*�,
Sr
',�-cvd EJ$t6r-ag'e1Shdd El'i$igh'-,
-�Gr d*
Fence'.. a..!ng
f
L]F S,,'
f Tdii�aiit,.Ifhpro've'ment/Ch6ogei"b Use ire Ystdffi.(SPeciifV
IF] Reteiinin gWaffl':
F1 Othdtjtpecifyj
HEAT SOURCE (CHECK THE PRIMARY FUEL SOURCE FOR HEAT/HOT WATER)
HEAT F] Natural Gas 0 Propane [:1 Electric 0 Oil 0 Geothermal El Other
HOT WATER F1 Natural Gas 0 Propane El Electric E] Oil E] Geothermal E] Other
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: (i.e. VA, V13, III B, etc.)
DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
Please provide a complete detailed written scope of work for the proposed project.
Additions (additional square footage): Specify room use, floor level and square footage and
direction if applicable (i.e. 545 square foot master bed room/bath room addition on the second floor
with 140 square foot deck and 245 square foot kitchen addition on the main floor at south side of
house).
Remodels (interior renovations): Specify room uses and floor levels (i.e. combine bedrooms 1 and
2 on the main floor to create new master bed room/bath room; replace dining room sliding glass door
with new French doors, reconfigure kitchen with new island prep counter and install new gas fireplace
in the living room).
V,J/ J, I A�)
Ir I A A 4_)1A1AA;V,1Jk, All,"I,�vrAj +0 W41*11ff4�,
PROPOSED NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THIS PROJECT:
Basement: sq ft
(Select Basement Type: F]Finished F-1 Unfinished
First Floor:
2nd Floor:
sq ft 'Garage:
sq ft Deck:
3 RD Floor: sq ft Other:
Contractor's Bid: 'to �q
sq ft
sq ft
sq ft
L:\TEMP\BUILDI`NG\IiAND0UTS REVISED IN 2009\2009 updated bandouts\FORM A.doc 5/19/2009 2
Page I of 2
Harrison, Marie
From: Pam Stuller [pam@walnutstreetcoffee.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:12 PM
To: Harrison, Marie
Subject: Re: BLD20090368
yes, thanks.
Pam Stuller
206-914-1753
http://walnutstreetcoffee.com
On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Harrison, Marie wrote:
Hi Pam: So do you wish to withdraw your application for the parking lot? BLD20090368
Sincerely,
Mo,rie, 4+xrri5on
I�A, Ple,150 COtbilier 6C I2t)VirQt)rT)et)t bef 6�e peintinq t�is
----- Original Message -----
From: Pam Stuller [mai Ito: pamCcbwa In utstreetcoffee.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:14 PM
To: Harrison, Marie
Subject: Re: BLD20090368
thanks for the reminder -- but we've decided not to make any changes to the lot
afterall.
Best,
Pam
Pam Stuller
206-914-1753
htt ://walnutstreetcoffee.com
On Oct 7, 2009, at 10: 14 AM, Harrison, Marie wrote:
Good Morning Pam. Just a reminder we need the
attached form completed by Patrick along with a check
for $155.50 so we can issue your permit for your parking
lot. Thank you.
Sincerely,
E. Marie Harrison
Senior Permit Coordinator
10/7/2009
0 0
410 walhwf-
CITY OF EDMONDS
dk-.
STREET FILE
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Name of Proposed Project:
OW4;lAppic
Name I � ? D q 2— 1 �i: —,A—, (a, tv
Street/Mailing Address
!�'�IP64�'Vvz W47—
city Stati zip
Telephone: 12-b
WORK SHEET
Applicant Contact Person:
6-4jm&
Name
Street/Mailing Address
city State Zip
Telephone:
Traffic Engineer who prepared. the Traffic Impact Analysis:
Finn Name
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Contact Name
Telephone
a. Street address (if known): It) 0 �/V, 1i h�?�Czt EIA MOW&
b. Location:
(Attach a vicinity map and siteplan.)
c. Spec fy existing land use: e;Allalyr-
d. Specify proposed type and size of development: C,,�)AAII A0 AVD06 A NA� 5q!�U—�
4�n c 5-140P
e. When will the project begin conptruction and when will it be completed? 6(6,V)
Cc ol f 11� I, -� �Y�-, �
f. Define proposed access locations:
W==Q1 aw-
1A m— %,,p qaj F-,*
g. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: MAR -2 i 2006
BUIL941 Rr-m i P IMCN7
Ciw',6��&�O"NDS
Pa2e I
:Lm
0
Five Years After Opening-LOS:
With Project:
Without Project:
Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
7.. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact
fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified
in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130.
� 5-0, T U
t 1,00, 06 ?-tkV3 ke-
-roTlArL- -DU rc-,
SAENGRU3wmMCi1y ProjoMMA GuidelincslTraflrMAnalyWork 9-U.dw Pave -5
Walnut Street Cbffee
Plan check 06-033
Your table does not account for pass -by trips. We have estimated reasonable pass -by rates in the table below.
Straight Calculation by City of Edmonds Guidelines Accounting for Pass-Bv'TriDS
SF Factor
Trip Rate
% New Trips
Pass -by*
Trip Length Factor
shopping center 1.135
3.74
0.81
20%
0.4
restaurant 1.135
10.86
0.56
80%
1.06
* Pass by conservatively estimated at 20% for florist and 80% for coffee shop.
Net New Trips Fee Per SF Fee
1.10 0.84 $ 953.67
1.46 1.12 $1,268.37
Difference $ 314.70
0
0
Page I of I
McConnell, Jeanie
From: Pam Fairchild [pam.fairchild@comcast.net)
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:36 PM
To: McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: Re: Plan Check 06-033 Walnut Street Coffee - corrected version
One typo in the spreadsheet I just sent. I switched the calculations to the restaurant from fast food, but
forgot to change my heading... this is the correct version.
thanks Pain
M
4/7/2006
0
4)
Date:
To:
From:
Via:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
April 11, 2006
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Don Sims, Traffic Engineer
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Walnut Street Coffee — Traffic hnpact Analysis
STREET FILE
Av A64 &+
Per your determination, the existing impact fee rates found in section 18.82.120 of the ECDC do
not accurately represent the anticpated traffic/trip generation that could be realistically expected
for the proposed Walnut Street Coffee Shop located at 4 10 Walnut Street in downtown
Edmonds. ECDC 18.82.130.0 authorizes the Development Services Director to "adjust the
impact fees on a case -by -case basis based on the independent fee calculation, the specific
characteristics of the development, and/or principles of fairness."
ITE Code 833, (ECDC 18.82.120.V.),"Fast Food, no drive up" was determined to most closely
describe the type of Land use, however, the corresponding trip rate was found to not be
representative for this specific proposed establishment and location. Specifically, two
"adjustments" were made to Table 4 "Impact Fee Rates".
1) The vehicular trip rate was reduced by 50% from 26.15 to 13.08. The justification for
this is based on the site location. The location of this proposed development will likely
generate a significant percentage of pedestrian oriented clientele based of it physical
location in core downtown Edmonds district.
2) The pass -by rate was adjusted from the current nationally accepted industry rate of 48%
for fast-food establishments to 80% for a coffee shop. The current ITE trip generation
manual does not provide for a specific pass -by rate for the coffee shops nor were there
any current studies available to confirm this, however, engineering judgment was used
in this case that assumes that 4 out of 5 vehicular trips that patronize the coffee shop are
existing trips already on the road network and correspondingly, I out of 5 are added
new trips on the network.
Overall, these adjustments translate to this coffee shop attracting 13 vehicular trips during the pin
peak hour, with 10.4 being pass -by trips and 2.6 being new trips to the network.
City of Edmonds
Accordingly, a traffic impact fee of $550.26, is recommended for the Walnut Street Coffee
Shop, calculated as follows:
ITE Code: 833
ITE Land Use: Fast Food, no drive -up
Trip Rate: 26.15
50% Trip Rate: 13.08
80% Passby Trip Rate: 2.61 (net new trips per hour on the network)
Impact Fee Per Unit: $1.24 per square foot
Calculation:
$1.24 x 1135sf = $1405.81 (new use)
$0.93 x 1135sf = $1055.55 (less rate of existing use)
Net Impact Fee: $350.26
Review Fee: $200.00 (per 18.82.130B)
Total Fee: $550.26
Approved: Y, (Z V_
D�e Ei�;wma�, Development Services Director
P"M
INC— <)o
. is
PROPERTY OWNER NAME:9-il
BUSINESS NAME:
BUSINESS OWNER NAME:
ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE:
`,T�R
- FFT FILE
RECEIVED
JUN 15 2006
BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT #: 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
STREET USE PERMIT
APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS: 1`1�04 2 1 �(�cc IV VU I C-> 16 n yr/ b V1 L', (-4-66 !MIJ-7
W�'M - -6A iv*ob IV J
Placement of any temporary or movable objects in any portion of public space or City night -of -way shall
meet all Code Requirements as set forth in the following chapters of the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
18.70 STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
17.65 LIN41TED OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE
17.70.040 TEMPORARY USES; Bistro and outdoor; dining
PERMIT ISSUANCE
A Street Use Permit may be issued, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, City Engineer
or their respective designee, for temporary objects located within any public space, fight -of -way, roadway,
parking strip and/or sidewalk, including the air space above them, if they are placed in compliance with the
above referenced Code Sections and the following criteria are met: .
> It has been concluded that the proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or
pedestrian travel;
> Architectural Design Board approval has been granted or the process has been administratively
approved;
> The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the fights of the public;
> Items shall be placed adjacent to the building and may encroach onto a maximum of two feet of the
public sidewalk; or in accordance with Bistro and outdoor dining code; or per an approved building
permit;
> Safe pedestrian travel Area, or clear zone, of 44 inches minimum width shall be maintained on City
sidewalks; (see definition of clear zone below)
> Exterior light fixtures, banners, signs and flags must be a minimum of 7 feet above City right-of-way;
> Clear landings of 44 inches or no less than the width of the door (whichever is greater), measured
toward the street, shall be maintained on the exterior side of all required exit doors;
> Illumination from City light fixtures shall not be blocked;
> No objects shall be hung from City light standards; and
SAEngr\Forms\Street Use Permit.doc STREET FILE Revised 12/5105
�> Three feet of clearance around fire hydrants, standpipes, manholes, water meters, blowoffs, cleanouts
and valves shall be maintained.
Clear Zi,)ne Definition: Clear Zone refers to an area 7. feet in height and 44 inches in Width providing a
level, safe walking surface along the public sidewalkliel.g. theasurinp, 44 inches from.-edee of street tree
grates or newspaper stands toward place of business and from the ground up to a h6ight of 7 feet).
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED STREET USE: W4
K I WON FRO M
- w w.www�w. w ww
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN -
NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature, shall vest no
permanent right and shall..be issued and may in any case be ' revoked at'the sole. discretion of the City per
ECDC 18.70.040. By signing this application, the,applica ' nt accepts responsibilityfor all existing andlor
future street uses. Applicant is responsible to provide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the
beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 21" day ?f January.
INDEMNITY. The applicant understands and by hislher signature to this application, agrees to hold the
City ofEdmonds harmlessftom any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever,
foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City ofEdmonds, or any of its
departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings includin I g
defense costs, court costs, and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. In addition, the applicant
understands that helshe shall provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate
of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, andproviding that it shall
be primary as to any other policy of insurance.
CODE APPLICA TION. By signing the application below the applicant warrants that s1he has read'or. had
the opportunity to read Chapter 18.70, 17.65, and, 17.70.04*0 of the Edmonds- Community Development
Code and s1he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as ifselforth in
full and this application andpermits therefore are subject to the terms of those Chapters.
SIGNATURE ZI DATE
_&' 6 �j Z-06'
-Property dwnek/lItiAnes's Owner
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Approved b VQ'AA4AJU Insurance Verified b��
Building Perntit Street Use Fee:
Receip t No
Issued by: Date: van_;� Copy to Applicant: 0 Pick-up E] Mail
SAE.ngrToffns\Street Use ' ermi t.doc Revised 12/5/05
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
ENGINEERING APPLICAUON ACCEPTANCE
Thursday,June 15.2006
Your Application has been accepted by the City of Edmonds and we will start the review process with the
information you provided. More information and changes may be required during this process.
Application Number: ENG20060145
Project Address: 410 WALNUT ST, EDMONDS
Intersection:
Permit Type: Street Use
APPLICANT CONTR-kCTOR BUSENESS
WALNUT STREET COFFEE RUSSELL SIGN CO WALNUT STREET COFFEE
19304 21ST AVE NW 5629 208TH ST SW 9H 4 10 WALNUT ST
SHORELINE. WA 98117 LYNNWOOD. WA 98036
EDMONDS, WA 98020
206-914-1753 425-775-7010 206-914-1753
Work Description:
SIGN OVER SIDEWALK
Outstanding Items atTime ofSubmittal:
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
K v�r'166
To view up to date information aboutyour permit please visit the City ofEdmonds Development Services website
at h1tp.-11www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
411D
The-
ACORDDATE
,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSUMNCE
(MWDDNM)
2/l/2007
PRODUCER (206)621-6444 FAX (206)515-0560
Gurry and Rogers Insurance Agency, Inc.
1200 Sth Ave. #1825
Seattle WA 98101
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC #
INSURED
Walnut St. Coffee, LLC
19304 21st Ave NW
,Seattle WA 98177
INSURER A: CBIC
INSURER B:
INSURER C:
INSURER D:
INSURER E-
9 -9 Nv�wnl4W%_
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY
REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,
THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LTR
ADD'L
INSRO
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE (MWDDIYY)
N
PODALTCEYX=
LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 11000,000
A
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
I CLAIMS MADE FK OCCUR
B212AAL370
2/24/2007
2/24/2008
DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
$ 300,000
MED EXP (Any one person)
$ 5,000
& ADV INJURY
$ 1,000,000
-PERSONAL
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$ 2,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
7 PRO- LOC
PCLICYF_� JECT F
PRODUCTS- COMP/OPAGG
$ 2,000,000
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
$
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Per accident)
$
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
PROPERTYDAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
$
OTHERTHAN EA ACC
$
RANY AUTO
AUTO ONLY: AGG
$
EXCESSIUMBRELLA LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
AGGREGATE
$
OCCUR F1 CLAIMS MADE
$
DEDUCTIBLE
$
RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
�TATIU- TH-
TWOCR LIM TS OER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNERIEXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
If yes, describe under
E.L. DISEASE - EA
$
-EMPLOYEE
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
-SPECIAL PROVISIONS below
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS
City of Edmonds is additional insured as respects the operations of the named insured re: wall mount sign, flower box
and seasonal outdoor charia located in the City right-of-way re: ,410 Walnut S.t,,jZdmond8, WA.
City of Edmonds
Attn: Theresa Umbaugh
Permit Coordinator
121 Sth Ave. North
Edmonds, WA 98020
%'MN%'r_LA.A I lum
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
30 DAYS wRiTrEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT
FAILURE TO 00 SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE
ACORD 25 (2001/08)
IMOV41a lulubhub pkma
vmt- mortgage b0lutons, Inc. (80U)3Z7-U545
@ ACORD CORPORATION 1988
Page 1 of 2
E T F I E
I
STREET USE PERMIT APPLICATION
NAME OF APPLICANT:
. A(S
NAME OF BUSINESS: F 10'
MAILING ADDRESS: 11
CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE
/C ar EA),ob.
Koiljz*?-�n' 107- YJi oe -;Wof Zz
ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE: Z�10
Descrj�e t�g public place of portion o�pubjic spice to beutij�ized:
V; �%i
Specify the type of use desired: Ah"--v
Specify the length of time for use : C,,,WFI
NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a. temp-orary nature and that no vested right is granted
INDEMNITY The applicant understands and by his/her signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds
harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense or
any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the
application understands that the City,)shall be provided a Certificate of Insurance to indemnity and hold harmless the City of
Edmondsfrom all claims andlorpropo�ty damage, and naming the City ofEdmonds as an additional insured
CODE,4PPLIC,4TION By
Chapter 18 of the Edmond
incorporated herein as ifqe,
application below the applicant warrants that s1he has read or had the opportunity to read
�v Development Code and s/he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are
f and this application andpermits therefore are subject to the te�ms of toat Chapter.
Struseho.d0qj1g6/9
a
SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL FROM ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS
When a'pplicab - le, if the street use proposal directly impacts any adjacent business or private property owner
the applican�i'must obtain written approval from the affected parties. Note, this requirement is evaluated by
City Staff and, when required, the applicant will �e notified.
Signature —Address
Signature Address
Signature.
Signature.
Address
Address
DO NOT WRIT B LOW THIS LINE-FORCITY USE ONLY
I '_"'J VV
W M dtj
Planning Division Approved By 14ATOU"' ADB� Date
-11to Zlof� 5t- W
worz�-
Public Works Approved By-6 T, Date
-%JW Vjw;�AtL
Fire Department Approved By 'ez�� Date
OM A.�_ Co(A P4Q '15 0 S'L f N Date
Police Department Approved By
Certificate of hisurance Verifie(
A
Qoul. kkxpr& T T-im"
Engineenng Division Approved B
Remarks or Comments:
STREET USE PERMIT#
RELEASED BY
BUILDING PERMIT #
0 � �
rim
-0 le, I I
, Jafaaly."1111��
=0
16
Struseho.docj1g6/98
Sent by: BALCOS INSURANCE 206 �83 4408; O�/22/99 2:30PM;jfiffjUL-#199;Page 1/1
V
liko L441�
I
ACORD CERTIFICATE OF
-Iqqmr—
LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE (NMIDDtft)
9127J99
C
PRODUCER
Tj ils
I Icos Insurance, Inc.
9 16th Avenue NW
ftle WA BB117-3602
10061"16% THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
A TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
INSURED:
COMPANY
Patirick Girardi
P 0 Box 1636
COMPANY
Edmonds WA 98020
C
COMPANY
D
COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVEBEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMENT. TERM OR
CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED 13Y PAID CLAIMS.
co
LTFZ
TYPE 0; INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE (MMIDOPM
POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (mMiDDIM
LIMITS
GENERAL
LIABILITY
GENERAL AGGREGATE
s 2,000,000
5 2,000,000
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
COMPJ0P AGC
A
CLAIMS MADE[] OCCUR
OWNER�S &CIONTRACIOR6 PROT
680-34BH7229
7/1199
711/00
S 1.000,000
.. -.—
S 1,000.000
..,P.RODUCTS
PERSONAL AOV INJURY
1 .... .....
EACH OCCURENCE
FIRE DAMAGE (Am cri lira)
$ 300,000
S 5.000
MED GXP (Any one perisan
AUTOMOBILE
LIABIUTY
ANY AUTO
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
$ 1,000,000
BODILY INJURY
(Par par=n)
ALL COWNEC AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
X
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
680-34SH7229
711199
7j1/00
BOOILY INJURY
(Per acrideno
PA OP ERTY DAMAGE
S
GARAGE LIABILITY
�UTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
ANY ALIM
OTHER T�-4AN A= ONLY:
EACH ACCIDENT
AGGREGATE
S
EXCESS LIABILrTV
EACH OCCURRENCE
�RE�LTL_
UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS'LIABLI
T- CYSILA 1��
OR 'M
EL EACH ACCIDENT
THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL
PARTNERSIEXECUTIVE
OFFICERSARE EXCLI
P
EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$
S
=ASE - EA EMPLOYEE
EL D;Sr
IOTHER
CESCIRPTION OF OPERAIIONSILOCATOt4SNF-HICLES/SPECJAL ITEMS
City of Edmonds is additional Insured as regards 410 Walnut Street, Edmonds. WA.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
city of Edmonds
I fith Ave N,
onds, WA 98020
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION CATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL 94DEONOR-440 MAIL
46 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE L.CrT
ng
AU"HORIZE0 REPR
Scott Balcos
ACORD 25-S 11196) 0 �W�— 1— ....
:UT
-OLLARD
CUT
I
E L. -i (o'
oa
1:5 1 c"
NEW Co CRETE CU�5.
7T T Oro 05 1 #4 0037
= A I , I—
L
o"
pop
5 - - �&.. .
FDASKING 4REo
--,�!PHALT
ONE WAY TRAFFIC
LESS THAN 2% SLOPE
MOW:--' 1,VAY/e:LjMp N
5OLLARD
leg
5E- REMOYED
EX15TING
5UILDNG
10'BE, 50FT,
5OLLARD
ro 131T
0 1- 3 e>'- 4 ''
/001-- 41—LEY
Irg —
171-AAA %-r
EXIS ING
5TOR,4�E/5�4ED;
(TO BE RfMOVED)
(o 0 8 I.F T.
------------
Cl'). Y OF EDMONDS 4W
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
A. *Address or vicinity of Construction
n I 1�r P 1 A 0- 1 A 1 -0 A; A
0 Owner: V,7twhinqton Natural Gas CO.
Name
805 15ra AV NE
Mailing Address
Bzllewe, Nashington 98007
city, - S ta te, Zip Code
0 Contractor: Aq. 7AIlmnz
Name
PW No.
Issue- Date
0 Permit Issued To:
9 Type of Work to be Done: Tnst;?11
0 Work in Connection With:
El Sub or Plat El, Single Family
El - Comml. / Ind. 0 Apt. Condo.
0 Pavement Cut: El Yes - El No
Mailing Address State License Number
Z
City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number
U
P.
0. —NO WORK TOPEGIN PRIOR.TO- PERMIT IS UANCE
B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
0
U
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
0
Funds held from the Securit� Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant-,
Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call
775-2525, extension 220.
Z
0
�D
U
0:�
0
I understand that this pe--yJit U--ust be available it the b site for inspection purposes at all times.
Signaturewo-14w,&' V. ate Feb 13, 1981
Owne nt-
-01P
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
C. Issued By: '6 `f) n-1 JVA
Void after r, -3 n
Time Authorized: days
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
Permit Fee:
Security D6posit:
Receipt No.:
Fel�-. F1
51
tr Eps
tt ENMW�
X
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * i�0 6
I'm
Eng. Div. December 1973
FIELD INSPECTITOOT ES (Fun d 11 1 ute cony to Stre et Dent.
Diagram:
= I
Contractor called for inspection_ Yes No
v
Nork DisaT)proved Bv: Date: Bv: Date:
Work Apuroved Bv: 5�01 -
- —Date:
Inspector:
Eng. Div. December 1978
PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW ROUTING
TREET FILE
SITE ADDRESS: 4fo Wo In u'lf
TYPE:
BUIILDING PERMIT (CHECK ONE)
SID SEWER PERMIT
RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT
�21
SINGLE FAMILY
MULTIPLE
STREET USE PERMIT
COMMERCIAL
STREET TREE PERMIT
FENCE
SEPTIC TANK DESIGN PERMIT
GRADING
NEW METERMATER SERVICE
DEMOLITION
E.I.S.
RELOCATION
OTHER:
SUBDIVISION REVIEW
PLAT/PRD REVIEW
DRAINAGE PLAN
IN
�OUT
Reviewed By: Date Reviewed- I
(See Comments;= —Ell
CITY ENGINEER g 21, 0 71b
DRAINAGE ENGIN FR
El
WATER/SEWER DIVISION
1:1
STREET DIVISION
ED
P.14. RECEPTIONIST
WORK ORDER COORDINATOR
UTILITY BILLING
DIRECTOR/ADMIN'ISTRATOR
El
RECORDS (FILE).
OTHER:
COMMENTS:
2/3/81
, 7- - ' * - '-�- - - - - - - - �-. -r-. - , , -
0 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CIENTER - MMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 775-2525
Dr=PARTMr=NT OF PUBLIC WORKS
February 14, 1980
HARV� H. HARRISON
MAYOP
Bayside Refinishing
410 Walnut
Edmonds,*Washington 98020
Gentlemen:
STRECT FIL
SUBJECT: 'STREET USE PERMIT -1410-WALNUT J,
The Street Use Permit you recently applied for in
connection with a sign at 410 Walnut, has been --approved and
enclosed -is your copy.
The Insurance Certificate has been received and'as the
Certificate is renewed., a copy should be sent to this office.
. Thank you for your cooperation and if you have any
questions, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
.F. HERZBERG, P.E.
Director of Public Works
j ak
Enclosure
CE dt. Nims dt.
0
00
0 1
El
-CITY OF E D M S
FEB 4 1980
TO -
ITCUTT
L�_)
0
jx
z
au
SMST7,51A)TE:
— -
MAYOR
As We Discussed
Investigate
and report —
Take Appropriate
Action
Prepare Letter/Memo for
My Signature
Mayor's Signature
Previously Refd
Status of Action?
For your Information
Note & File
Return to -
MAYOR'S ADMIN. ASST.
CHIEF of POLICE
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CLERK
COMMUN. DEVELOP. DIR.
FINANCE DIRECTOR
FIRE CHIEF
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
,gTTTT,nTNC, J)FPT_
XXX
_
COMMENTS: HARRY, PLEASE SIGN
THE ATTACHED
STREET USE PERMITo IT HAS
.BY ADB AND THE CITY COTINCIT,
BEEN APPROVED
WE ARE AWAI
RECEIPT OF AN INSURANCE
CERTIFICATE.
THANK YOU.
0�?
Z)
FROM: Judy P.W. Dept -
DATE: 1/31
I
00
0 *
February 8, 1980
MEMO TO: Public Works Department Director
FROM: Building Offical
SUBJECT: STREET USE PERMIT Bayside Refinishing , 410 Walnut
Sign Permit no. 800036
Certificate of Insurance for your records.
ka,4�. �& Z,,O� -
Harry w P ir_cur_r_
tuilding Inspector
HW/rm
enc/
RECEIVED
FER1 11980
SELYINEFIN WHIS Ma RM11 MEN i RESNZR�SR
9 9
Nmr. - u =qw
1 M 6 om V0 @MUOMIM
0. �99
0 0 U�IK� WUW
.NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY
Ed Nichols Insurance Agency Inc.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES
COMPANY L%8 SafeCO
PO Box 1929
LETTER
COMPANY BO
Lynnwood, Wa. 98036
LETTER 0
NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED
COMPANY
Bayside Refinishing
LETTER
410 Walnut
COMPANY
Edmonds, Wag 98020
LETT ER
.
COMPANY
LETTER
This is to certify that policies of insurance listed below have been issued to the insured named above and are in force at this time.
- - -
Limits of Liability in Thousands
(OUO-T-
COMPANY
LETTER
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY
EXPIRATION DATE
EACH
AGGREGATE
OCCURRENCE
GENERAL LIABILITY
A
CP815788
12-12-80
BODILY INJURY
$
$
COMPREHENSIVE FORM
PREM IS ES-OPERAT IONS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
$
EXPLOSION AND COLLAPSE
HAZARD
UNDERGROUND HAZARD
F� PRODUCTS/COMPLETED
, OPERATIONS HAZARD
BORILY INJURY AND
300
300
CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
$
BROAD FORM PROPERTY
COMBINED
DAMAGE
DINDEPENDENT
CONTRACTORS
PERSONAL INJURY
$
PERSONAL INJURY
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
BODILY INJURY
$
(EACH PERSON)
COMPREHENSIVE FORM
BODILY INJURY
$
(EACH OCCURRENCE)
OWNED
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
HIRED
BODILY INJURY AND
NON -OWNED
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
COMBINED
EXCESS LIABILITY
BODILY INJURY AND
F� UMBRELLA FORM
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
$
POTHERTHAN UMBRELLA
COMBINED
.1,
FORM _; J i
WORKERS'COMPENSATION
STATUTORY
�0(1'44
..11ifluq gad, liq
i$
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
(EACHACCIDENT)
OTHER
I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS&OCATIONSNEHICLES; I
The City of Edmonds is an Additional Named Insured
Cancellation: Should any of the above dej(dibed policies be cancelled before, the expiration date thereof, the issuing com-
pany will endeavor to mail - days written notice to the below named certificate holder, but failure to
mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER:.
The City of Edmonds
250 5th Ave N.
Edmonds, Wa, 98020
DATE:
IN
2-4-80
JACORD 2
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Wo
CITY OF EDMONDS
200 DAYTON ST - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 775-2525
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
January 31, 1980
Bayside Refinishing
410 Walnut
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:* STREET USE PERMIT -'SIGN
HARVE H. HARRISON
MAYOR
The City Council at their meeting of January 29, 1980,
approved the issuance of the Street Use Permit for placement
of a sign on your business office.
It is required that you submit an insurance certificate
to thisDepartment prior to issuing the Permit. The City
requires a minimum of $3001,000 bodily injury liability
coverage and $100.,000 property damage c0verage.
If you have any questions regarding this certificate,
please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
f
FRED F. HERZBERG, P.E.
Director of Public Works
jak
12A) h t Ion
Nims d' n
CITY OF"EDMONDS, PU�LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
200 DAYTON S'MEET
EDMONDS, 14A - 98020
775-2525
APPLICATION FOR STREET USE PE-R-MIT
Name of Applicant:
�Ilailing Address: - 4 / n 4-,J -A I Y) , ri- -
Telephone Number: Date:
Description of Public Place or Portion thereof desired to be used: (exhibit may be
attached)
I
Type of Use desired to be -made of Publi-Q Place: n' I A- Lj-,S' / dL_,
,:--- 4, / Y*) /%S, k .1 . "') r. I
if dppl-icable, attach plans and specifications for any utility or structure to be erected
and/or maintained on the Public Place: A-0-6- �Jo - i () 9 —:Z!7 . —
TE.m[)ORAR)Y PERMIT:. Unless otherwise designated herein, this permit is understood by
app icant to be wholly of a temporary nature, that it vests no permanent right whatsoever.
if the permitted use becomes dangerous or such structure shall become insecure orjunsafe,
or shall not be constructed, maintained or used in accordance with the provisions of this
title, the same may be revoked and the structure and obstrtictions ordered removed by order
of the City Engineer. If this application is for a specified period of time, the terms
of said application is:
ItZDNINITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold
the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, daniages or claims of any kind or descrip-
tion whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made aqainst the applicant or the City
of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense
of any 'legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees.by reason
of granting this permit. In addition, applicant understands that the City shall be provided
a certificate of insurance to indem ' nify and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from all
clainis and/or property damage, naming the City of Edmonds as an also insured.
APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 6.40 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE: Applicant warrants*that he has read,
or had the opportunity, to read, Chapter 6.40 of the Ednionds City Code, attached herewith,
and understands that all terms of that Ordinance are incorporated herein as if set forth
in full and this application and permit therefore are subject to the terms of that Chapter
of the Edmonds City Code.
Applicant's Si ture
Da te
11/7/74 rev.
.-City,of"Edmonds , Public
Irs Dept.
APPLi*CATION FOR STREET—USEORMIT -- PLge 2
I
Approval (and Agreement, if applicable) of Abutting Property Owners:
Signature Printed Name Address Date
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
City Council Approval (Attach Minute Entry): Approved 1/29/80
Permit Fee: Annual Fee: due January 1, 19
Aiiiienities Design Board Approval (if applicable) Attach Minute Entry: 1/2/80
Building Official Approval (if applicable): Signa—ture — ate
Provision for Indemnity:
Teri,,is and Provis'ion of Performance Bond, if applicable: (Reference 6.40.050 of applicable
Ordinance)
PERMIT AUTHORIZATION BY P.14. DTRE
PERMIT NO. D A T E V-4 6
Remarks:
11/7/74 rev.
00 0
THESE SE * S SUBJECT
TO FEBRUARY 5 APPROVAL
RFCr-_IvE[)
STR`MET F11 JDmoNDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEB 1960
January 29, 1980
(Work Meeting) D-Ir. 01 Pilhlir: LVnr�s
The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 8:05 p.m. by
Mayor Harve Harrison -in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. All present
joined in the flag salute.
PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
Harve Harrison, Mayor Charles Dibble, M.A.A.
Jo -Anne Childers Fred Herzberg, Public Works Director
Bill Kasper John LaTourelle, Planning Consultant
Katherine Allen Mary Lou Block. Acting Planning Division Manager
John Nordquist Irene Varney Moran, City Clerk
Ray Gould Jack Weinz, Fire Chief
Tom Carns Jim Jessel, Parks & Recreation Division Manager
Larry Naughten John Wallace, CityAttorney
Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk
City Attorney John Wallace administered the oath of office to Councilman Ray Gould
who was reelected to office in the November 6, 1979 election but had been out of town
since the new term commenced in early January..
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION: Items (E) and (F) were removed from the Consent Agenda.; COUNCILMAN CARNS MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN ALLEN, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION
CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda included the following:
(A) Roll call.
(B) Approval of Minutes of January 22, 1980.
(C) Setting date of February 5. 1980 for hearing on liquor license application
of Go N Joy Foods No. 5.
(D) Report on bids opened January 23. 1980 for 1980 displacement type cold
water meters. and award to low bidder, Pacific Water Works Supply Co., in
the amount of $25,922.29, including sales tax.
_(G) Approval of Street Use Permit for Bayside Refinishing, 06-Wil-6—ut —
DRimm-G—rItem—(E) on
PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING STATF STAT[rrF REGARDING DRUN� Nst.
.Consent AgenUa-]
Councilman Gould had not been present when this propos ed ordinance was discussed by
the Council. He felt the State law should be adopted as it was drafted and should
not be modified in any way. He felt it had been drafted so as to be uniform throughout
the state in its application and as to penalty. Other Council members explained to
him that they, also, had felt as he did until.Municipal Court Judge Richard Thorpe
had explained the rationale for giving the Court discretion to waive the mandatory
one -day jail sentence under extraordinary circumstances., Councilman Gould noted that
discretion is permitted if the penalty will cause physical or mental distress to the
offender, but he did not find the terminology "extraordinary circumstances" definitive
enough to warrant discretion, and he did not feel the law should be diluted. He
commented that in other countries where*the mandatory penalty is required the law has
proven to be a deterrent to drunk driving, and he felt the people should know that
they will serve the penalty if they take enough alcohol to lose control. Council-
woman Allen felt that the proposed ordinance provided for a mandatory jail sentence,
and she asked that the Council receive copies of any of the written judgments that
defer the sentence. She felt that if the Council then disagreed with the Judge's
decisions or felt he was too lenient, then the ordinance could be changed. COUNCILMAN
MOTION: CARNS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NAUGHTEN, TO APPROVE ITEM (E) ON THE CONSENT
00 09
STREL'-T FILE
Management Master Program and the Edmonds Policy Plan. Details of the proposal were
provided in the Planning Commission minutes. The public portion of the hearing was
opened, no one wished to speak, and the public portion was closed. Councilman Nordquist
said he had received some telephone calls from neighbors in this area which appeared
to support the recommendation of the Planning Commission. COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST THEN
MOTION: MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, TO APPROVE THE SHORELINES MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR SM-2-79, PURSUANT TO P.C. RESOLUTION 627. MOTION CARRIED.
APPEAL OF ADB DECISION ON APPROVAL OF FURNITURE STORE AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 5TH
AND WALNUT (Baride Used Furniture - ADB-32-79)
Councilman Carns advised that he had discussed with the City Attorney his position on
this matter and the City Attorney had suggested that he not participate because of a
possible Appearance of Fairness Doctrine violation. Councilman Carns disagreed with
the City Attorney's opinion and explained that the applicant and he had done business
over the years and the applicant is a close friend of Councilman Carns' brother. On
the other hand an employee of Councilman Carns had spoken in opposition to the development
at the ADB meeting. Councilman Carns said he would step down if anyone on the Council
felt he should. Councilman Herb said he was sure Councilman Carns would be fair and
objective but the whole point of the Doctrine is that if there is even a remote
possibility of not being objective then a cloud is created. He felt Councilman Carns
should step down. Councilmen Naughten and Nordquist also stated they felt he should
step down. Councilman Carns then left the Council Chambers. Community Development
Director John LaTourelle said this matter had been heard by the ADB twice, receiving
approval at the second hearing. Minutes of those meetings had been provided to the
Council. Mr. LaTourelle read a letter from Warren LaFon, a,member of the ADB, in
which he stated that he felt the design of this building to be of high quality and
one of the best to come before the ADB in some time. Mr. LaFon stated further that
this building is the only building in the area except for the Shoreline Savings Bank
which has architectural merit and that the ADB made the only decision that could be
made on this, on its own merit and not on past decisions. It was noted that Jack
McClellan, the designer of the building being discussed, was present to represent the
applicant. Assistant City Planner Mary Lou Block displayed drawings of the proposal.
It had be redesigned at the request of the ADB after -the first hearing in order to
lower it, and the height from the mean elevation was :31'6" or, measured from the
sidewalk on 5th Ave., 29'6". For comparison, Ms. Block gave the heights of several
buildings in the general area. The bank across the street and also on the west side
of 5th Ave. measures 33' at the sidewalk, the Finnegan Apartments building at 4th and
Walnut is 35', and the Raymond Apartments building is 33'. These are within viewing
distance of the proposal, and there are also numerous buildings which are lower. Ms.
Block approximated Milltown to be 30' high on the 5th Ave. side, possibly more. Mr.
LaTourelle commented that the owners of the VonMax Restaurant had approached the City
to discuss adding a second story to their building. lie also noted that the property
on the west side of 5th Ave. is somewhat lower than that on the east side. The
public portion of the hearing was then opened. A number of people spoke in opposition
to the proposal, feeling it was too high and stating -it would take away their views
and reduce their property values. In general they felt the maximum height should be
25'. Some stated that to allow this would create a,precedent and open the way for
more tall buildings and Edmonds would then lose the quaintness and charm which the
citizens valued. Speaking in opposition were Joe Calman, 524 Walnut; Louise Dwyer,
529 Holly; Jean Yost, 536 Walnut, William Mathias, 543 Holly; Steve Dwyer, 529 Holly;
Joanne Childers, 546 Walnut; Jane Morck, 525 Holly; John McCoy, Pine St.; Joseph
Dwyer, 529 Holly; and Cynthia Baker, 529 Walnut. Jack McClellan, designer of the
building, said they had met all the criteria set by the Building Department, Planning
Commission, and ADB, and they had no desire to create a hardship for anyone, but they
wished to build on their property within the rights set forth in this City. Ken
Mattson of 725 Daley, a member of the ADB, said if they were to go along with the
immediate neighborhood's desires then the City would end up with a whole row of 25',
flat roofed buildings, and that is not quaint or -desirable. He said the ADB had
worked with the designer and owner at several meetings and they were extremely coopera-
tive. He said this was one of the few buildings where the builders had gone out of
their way and spared no expense and they had done a very good job, and to change
their product at this point would be like sawing a classic painting in half to make
it smaller and not block view. He said the City needs variety, the highs and the
lows, and there are parameters within which a person can develop his property. He
felt that if the Council were to find that 25' was better than the allowed height
then that might be a spot rezone. Further, he advised the Council that if they had
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3 - July 24, 1979
any reservations about this project he strongly recommended a Council/ADB work session
so they could see what would happen if they cut the height arbitrarily, and they
essentially would be telling the owner that other people have the 35' privilege but
he does not. Carol McCrary, one of the owners of the subject property, said they
were not providing a daylight basement as some of the speakers had suggested because
of drainage --they had been told by Mr. Winters that they would cause him flooding
problems if they used a daylight basement. She said the furniture they handle is
unique and needs the height proposed for the upper floor. The public portion of the
hearing was then closed. Councilman Naughten commented that, design -wise, this was a
beautiful piece of work and the ADB had done a good job in reviewing it from all
aspects. His position, however, was that this is a small community and the Council
has to be sensitive to the impact such buildings have on the neighborhood. -He felt
people values were more important than building design, especially when views were
involved. He felt the profile of 5th Ave. was low and the roof of the proposed
building provided no function except aesthetic design. Councilman Gould said the ADB
had done a very fine job and he liked what they had done. He had attended the last
ADB hearing on this issue and he noted that they had gone by their guidelines. He
felt the issue now was one of policy and that there was something unique about the
building height in this situation, that being the location of the building relative
to the other residences in the nearby area. He noted that this building could be put
in some areas of Edmonds that would not impact the area. He agreed that the Council
should work with the ADB as suggested by Mr. Mattson, and he felt a change may be
needed in the policies under which the ADB can operate. Councilwoman Allen said she
had been in the applicants' present store and they do have large pieces of furniture.
She noted that this site is a part of the commercial zone and the City has goals and
policies regarding commercial land use. She agreed that the Council should meet with
the ADB and that it should be done prior to making a decision on this matter. MRS.
MOTION: ALLEN THEN MOVED THAT ADB-32-79 BE REMANDED TO THE ADB AND THAT THE COUNCIL INVITE
THEMSELVES TO ATTEND THAT ADB MEETING. City Attorney Wayne Tanaka advised the Council
Withdrawn of what actions they could take in this matter, after which COUNCILWOMAN ALLEN WITHDREW
HER MOTION. Councilman Nordquist felt the Council possibly should have addressed,
view sensitive areas previously, and he felt 25'- 26' height should be the maximum
for this piece of property. Councilman Herb stated that the issue is that the City
wants taste and taste means expense, and to justify that there has to be size. He
thought it was important that this was the first time the ADB had actually communicated
to the Council to urge them to approve something. It: bothered him that if this
building were reduced to 25' a tasteful building would be lost. COUNCILMAN NAUGHTEN
MOTION: THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST, THAT THE APPLICANT BE ASKED TO MODIFY
THE DESIGN TO A HEIGHT NO MORE THAN 25' FROM THE 5TH AVE. SIDEWALK AND TO RETURN THE
PLAN TO THE COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION, THIS MOTION BEING MADE FOR THE REASONS HE
STATED EARLIER. Councilman Gould noted that the Policy Plan refers to "other related
problems" and he felt they were developing a new policy for the City. A ROLL CALL
VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS NAUGHTEN, NORDQUIST, AND GOULD
VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS HERB AND ALLEN VOTING NO. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION: COUNCILMAN NAUGHTEN THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN HERB, THAT A JOINT MEETING
THE ADB BE SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 11 , 1979 TO REVIEW POLICY PLANNING. MOTION
CARRIED. Councilman Carns then returned to the rostrum.
HEARING ON PETITION REQUESTING ONE-WAY TRAFFIC, NO P%RKING AFTER 10:00 P.M., ETC., ON
City Engineer Fred Herzberg discussed three possible plans which had evolved after
the study of this situation. He displayed drawings to explain them and then recommended
Plan C which he felt was the most feasible. This would make Caspers one way, eastbound,
between 2nd and 3rd, no parking on the east side of Sunset, 4-hour parking on the
west side of Sunset until 10:00 p.m., no parking on the west side of Sunset after
10:00 p.m., and no left turn from the ferry. The public portion of the hearing was
opened. A large number of residents of Sunset Ave. spoke, describing the problems
they have experienced, especially since the closing of the beaches at night. They
described drinking, rowdiness, littering, obscene behavior, and destruction to their
property, all on the part of young people cruising and parking on Sunset. Among
those speaking were Shirley Pauls, 310 Sunset; Cecelia Light, 342 Sunset; Herb Wright,
400 Sunset; Edith Wicker, 386 Sunset; Marion Pierce, 340 Sunset; Betty Gay, 206
Sunset; Rosemary Wells, 120 Edmonds; and Bob Morrison, 250 Beach Pl. Rosemary Wells
felt if the parking were eliminated from Sunset it would cause the offenders to move
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4 - July 24, 1979
July 19, 1979
MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison
Mayor
FROM: John A. LaTourelle, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ADB DECISION ON APPROVAL OF
FURNITURE STORE AT S/W CORNER OF -FIFTH
AND WALNUT kBAYSIDE USED FU_RNITURE
ADB-32-79)
(P
This design was heard by the Architectural Design Board
on two occasions; May 2 and July 5, 1979. Minutes of
both hearings are attached, as well as the approved
site plan and elevations.
The concerns addressed in the letter of appeal were
reviewed by the ADB at the May 2 meeting. Additional
information was requested by the Board and at the July 5
meeting, ADB-32-79 was approved.
There are no unique features on this site and it is
surrounded by business and multi-family uses. The
staff feels the proposal complies; with Policy Plan
Section 208A, Downtown Concept, and Section 303A,
Commercial Land Use. Therefore, the Community Devel-
opment Department recommends upholding the ADB approval.
NEL/le
1&r 1�
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
July 5, 1979
The regular meeting of the Architectural Design Board was called to order by Chai man
Chauncey Wight at 7:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center.
PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT
Chauncey Wight David Kinderfather Nancy Luster, Associate Planner
Warren LaFon Mary Lou Block, Assistant City Planner
Bob Hintz John LaTourelle, Corrnun. Dev. Dir.
Greg Selvidge Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk
Ken Mattson
Perry Spanfelner
Ray Gould, Ex officio
Chairman Wight welcomed the audience and explained the makeup and functions of the
Board, the procedure of the hearings, and the method of appealing decisions of the
Board.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the regular meeting of June 6. 1979 had been distributed, MR. SPANFELNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LaFON, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1979. MOTION CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA
Ms. Luster asked that ADB-65-79 be moved to the Consent Agenda as all other signs
would be removed from the building and the proposed sign would be the only one used
and would be within the Sign Code requirements. MR. SPANFELNER MOVED, SECONDED BY
MR. MATTSON, TO MOVE ADB-65-79 TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Luster
then commented briefly on the Consent Agenda items. Mr. Mattson expressed some
concern regarding ADB-61-79 which would add a seagull to the "Welcome to Edmonds"
sign at 5th Ave. S. and SR104. He asked the Board how "cute" they wanted to get with
the City signs. Ms. Luster said the seagull had been donated and the Staff felt the
incorporation of it into the sign was acceptable. MR. SELVIDGE THEN MOVED, SECONDED
BY MR. SPANFELNER, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED, WITH MR. MATTSON
VOTING NO. The approved items on the Consent Agenda included the following:
ADB-50-79 KINDERFATHER, CHAFFOS & DUNN - Review of landscaping for office and
retail building at 121-Tt—hAve. N. (BC)
ADB-61-79 CITY OF EDMONDS - Review of addition to "Welcome to'Edmonds" sign at
5th Ave. S. a SR104
ADB-65-79 LEON COUCHEE - GRAY MATTER Review of sign for record shop at 22617
76th Ave. W. (CG)
Ms. Lusteradvised that ADB-64-79 had been withdrawn.
CONTINUED AGENDA
ADB-32-79 BAYSIDE USED FURNITURE - Review of west and south elevations for
Tu—miture store at the southwest corner of 5th and Walnut St. (BC)
At the last hearing on this item the Board had requested specific
information and had suggested the building be lowered slightly if
possible. The current plans indicated the grades at each corner of
the building as requested and the west and south elevations were
provided. The south elevation is a concrete/pumice block wall painted
a light beige (this is a fire wall). The west elevation located the
disposal cans. The east and north elevations had been reviewed previously.
The first -floor was now at the same grade as the 5th Ave. sidewalk and
the building will be 3'6" below the maximum building height at the top
ADB-111-78
ADB-22-79
Of the dome skylight. Ms. Luster stated that the project appeared to
comply with the Policy Plan sections 208A (Downtown Design Concept)
and 303A (Cormiercial Land Use). She felt the the design would not
have a substantial adverse effect on the area and that it would be
compatible with this section of the City. She recommended approval
because of the overall design and substantial compliance with Policy
Plan sections 208A and 303A. The Board studied the plans, and Mr.
Hintz commented that the applicant had addressed all of the concerns
the Board had expressed at the last meeting and it appeared all the
requirements were met. THEREFORE, MR. HINTZ MOVED, SECONDED BY MR.
LaFON' TO APPROVE ADB-32-79. Action on the motion was delayed because
several people in the audience indicated they wished to speak. Chairman
Wight opened the discussion to the public and requested that the
comments not be repetitious in view of the lengthy testimony taken at
the last hearing. Milton Hassel of 717 4th Ave. S. said the height
had not been reduced enough. He felt 25' should be the maximum and
that the cha m of Edmonds could be easily destroyed by allowing the
construction of buildings such as this. JoAnn Childers of 546 Walnut
felt the height of this building would diminish her property value and
her view. Jack McLellan, the designer for the project, said they had
made every effort to keep this building as low as possible. Mrs.
,Childers suggested the storage area be placed in the basement to
eliminate the top floor and he responded that the furniture has to be
off-loaded in the alley area and basement storage would not be satisfactory.
He said this building also has to be able to serve future needs.
Steve Dwyer of 529 Holly said this proposed structure is only 150'-
180' away from the Magne Hagen condominium which was the subject of a
court case which caused its height to be reduced. He felt no building
over 25' in height should be constructed in this area. He said the
bulk of the Shoreline Savings Bank is 26', the VonMax restaurant is
14'6", and this proposed building will be twice the height of the
VonMax. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Mr. LaFon
stated that he knew of no policy or Code requirement that said they
had to limit building heights to 25'. Joseph Dwyer of 529 Holly said
the Policy Plan calls for two story buildings in the downtown area and
that would not exceed 25'. Mr. LaFon then said this project was
reviewed at the last meeting except for the two elevations and he
found the design very compatible with the Policy Plan for the downtown
area. He said the height is nominal and he saw no reason not to
approve the proposal. THE MOTION THEN CARRIED.
TEIGLAND STRUCTURES - Revision to elevations for salvage enclosure and
parts saTe_s_a_t_72_M9 Highway 99 (CG)
Ms; Luster said the exterior materials had been changed on this proposed
building and the building would now be a steel structure. A brochure
describing the building was submitted. The applicant said the west
elevation -would remain masonry. Ms. Luster did not feel this change
would downgrade the previously approved project, and she recommended
approval. MR. LaFON MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HINTZ, TO APPROVE ADB-111-78.
MOTION CARRIED.
.ROBERT PANTLEY - Review of elevations, site and landscaping for
retail/restaurant building at 181 Dayton St. (CW)
Assistant City Planner Mary Lou Block summarized previous actions
which had been taken on this proposal by other bodies, including the
Shorelines Advisory Board, the Planning Commission, the City Council,
this Board, and the State Ecology Department. It had been approved by
all except this Board which had given partial approval and had asked
for further work In some areas. Ms. Block said the design of the
structure and the landscaping were the major points to be reviewed
this evening. Ms. Luster proceeded to review the project. noting that
the parapet which had been proposed around the top of the building to
screen the mechanical equipment had been deleted and the equipment
will be contained in a 4' deep well to drop it below the roofline.
The ductw6rk wil,l also be within the building so these will not be
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
Page 2 - July 5. 1979
must bear the seal and signature of a Ticensed structural engineer;
(2) Topographic survey must be submitted for establishment of building
height limitation; (3) Balcony rails mus.t be a minimum height of 3'6".;
(4) One -hour fire wall separation required between the parking garages
and the units; and (5) A minimum 32" clear exit width must be provided
between columns and walls in the garages. Ms. Luster noted that there
are existing single family homes on the east and west sides of this
site, but the zoning is RM. There are RM units across the street.
Chairman Wight noted that the Mugho Pines on the northeast corner
would not create a screen. The applicant stated the building would be
white stucco with everything else brown. The windows will be medium
bronze anodized aluminum and the chimneys will be painted brown. The
handrails will be brown wrought iron. Mr. Kinderfather felt there
should be some unification in the design in that there appeared to be
a number shapes involved. He suggested a flat roof for the entire
building rather than a pitched roof on part of it. It was noted that
there will be only an area I' wide on the east elevation, and Ms.
Luster suggested the use of a fence to screen the cars, -ather than
landscaping. MR. LaFON MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. KINDERFATHER, THAT ADB-81-78
BE RESUBMITTED WITH THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TO ESTABLISH THE BUILDING
HEIGHT LIMITATION; THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN BE RESUBMITTED WITH THE
NECESSARY CHANGES TO BRING IT UP TO CODE INCLUDING A FENCE ON THE EAST
SIDE; THAT THE COLORS BE RESUBMITTED AS ALL BROWN TRIM, 014 STUCCO IS
NOT GIV114G MUCH THOUGHT TO THE BUILDING; AND THAT,SOME THOUGHT BE
GIVEN TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE AS THE FLAT ROOF AND PIECE OF SLOPED ROOF
DO NOT GO TOGETHER. Mr. LaFon also a ' uestioned-whether this should not
be a two -level site instead of three levels. Mr. Kinderfather felt the
shapes of the elevations were confusing because there were so many
different kinds of shapes and fenestrations. He felt it looked like
three abutting buildings. He was concerned about the height limitation
on the top floor. He said when the Code provides a 30' height limitation
on a flat roof and 35' on a pitched roof it means to encourage pitched
roof buildings in this particular zone because they are attractive and
residential in character, but the solution presented had sort of gone
around the back way and did not meet the intent of the ordinance
although it complied with the letter of the law, The applicant said
they had tried to do some things to make the building interesting
because of the criticism they had received from the §oard on the
previous submittal. He did not know whether they could put a pitched
roof on the portion that was flat as it might restrict view.. He said
they wanted a recreation room on the back of the building which was
not on the original plans and that was why they added the back porch.
He felt this design was a considerable improvement over the original
plan. THE MOTION THEN CARRIED. It was suggested that this item be
heard at a special meeting, and Mr. Hintz felt the applicant needed
more direction from the Board as to roof design. MR. KINDERFATHER
MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. MATTSON, THAT ADB-81-78 BE CONTINUED TO A
SPECIAL MEETING TO BE HELD AT NOON, MAY 9, 1979, IN THE COUNCIL
CHAMBERS (IF AVAILABLE). MOTION CARRIED. The applicant said if the
height would permit a pitched roof would be put over the entire building.
ADB-32-79 BAYSIDE USED FURNITURE - Review of commercial retail project at the
southwest corner of bth Ave. and Walnut St. (BC)
Ms. Luster said this review was for final approval of elevations and
the site plan. The Staff previously had suggested one of the curb
cuts on Walnut be removed but on further consideration they felt the
additional curb cut would not be detrimental to the overall site and
it would alleviate some of the potential problems that might arise at
this location. She said the proposed landscaping should make the site
more attractive from the view across the street. She felt the new
elevations were an improvement over the previous ones and that this
building would be compatible with the bank across the street. The
fire wall had been lowered which improved the impact of the building.
The exterior materials will include wood with liaht colored textures,
and a dark colored metal roof (if the material cannot be obtained it
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
Page 2 - May 2. 1979
will be shingled). Ms. Luster felt the window treatments were good
and the overall design would blend with the area. She noted that the
site slopes a great deal to the west. 11. is surrounded by business
zoning. Utility meters and trash enclosures were not shown. The
south elevation will be backed up to an existing building and the west
elevation will be on an alley. Those elevations were shown and Mr.
Kinderfather commented that the applicant should be commended for
them. He asked, however, if the building needed to be designed at 35'
at the skylight. The applicant responded that most ofthe furniture
is imported older furniture which is very large, and they need the 10'
height on the retail floors to show off the furniture. Several people
in the audience indicated they wished to speak, so Chairman Wight
opened the discussion to the audience. Milton Hassel of 717 4th Ave. S.
said he was speaking on behalf of a number of concerned citizens to
express concerns over the height of the building. He said they were
aware of the fact that Bayside Furniture is an asset to the business
community of Edmonds but they felt the height of this building should
be lowered because of social and community considerations. He said
the proposed height would be in direct Contrast to the other buildings
in the block and would not enhance the aesthetic quality of the
environment of that particular area. He felt it was important to
retain the aesthetic charm of the downtown area of'Edmonds. He suggested
that the entrance to the store go into the second story, with the
first story beino below the grade as the grade on Walnut would encourage
that kind of construction. He also quoted a recent court ruling which
indicated additional restrictions could be placed on height and,
further, ". . . if certain members of the ADB were of the opinion they
had to 'rubber stamp' a plan just because it met the other zoning code
requirements, then thev were in error." He presented a petition in
opposition to the height of this building which he said contained 232
signatures. He also submitted photograp�s reflecting the heights of
buildings in the area which were lower than the proposed building.
Patti Price of Patti's Place on 5th Ave. felt the new building would
be an asset to the community but it was too high. She pointed out
also that most of the buildings in that area were low. Joseph Dwyer
of 529 Holly Dr. noted that Edmonds Lumber, Edmonds Garden Center, and
the Radio Shack all have underground storage and he suggested Bayside
Furniture could do the same as their proposed second floor is planned
mainly for storage. Chairman Wight then closed the audience discussion.
Mr. LaFon felt there had been a tremendous change to the good from the
previous submittal, but he felt more information was necessary before
giving final approval. Only two elevations had been submitted and he
felt the other two were necessary. He also felt the main floor might
be lowered somewhat. He noted that it appeared to be a little above
grade and it might be possible to lower it a bit, and he thought that-
should*be investigated. Mr. Kinderfather said he would like to see a
building section to see if there is any way to reduce it, but he felt
the building would be fitting for that location. Mr. Spanfelner said
he would like to see elevations of the existing soil. MR. LaFON THEN
MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. SPANFELNER, TO GIVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO
ADB-32-79 SO FAR AS DESIGN, MATERIALS, AND COLOR. Mr. Mattson then
asked the Board members if there was anyone on the Board who felt he
had to "rubber stamp" any proposal because it met other zoning code
requirements, as inferred earlier'by Mr. Hassel. There was a negative
response, and Mr. Mattson asked that the record so indicate. THE
MOTION THEN CARRIED. The applicant said he would speak with his
client and try to reduce each floor by 1'. A short recess was announced.
AGENDA
ADB-3-78 HOFTO HOMES - Review of changes in elevations and landscaping at 7613-
15 200th Sf. S.W. (RD)
Photographs were submitted to indicate changes made in landscaping the
front of the project. The rear yard's landscaping also was changed so
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
Page 3 - May 2, 1979
6L- --ZT - 9(2V
F 11-T IT t�S
, if
Ix,
a,P
Ir L -7
4 Sk
16
M'LILL&H S/s/79.,.
Z-1 XIL 9
A
0
.0 t'l
14 0
-A .:
. ...... . .....
it
4r
ipop.5-6=17 AS
7 -Alk.6
V. L P&,.t I
Ll&ill 4611,1, IwURUS
Ap e
M.,., ov r
APO- 32--79
alil 'LoOlL "Alm Li"s.
v-r.�Sv Moor
a,.b. I."
to
Lima
or'.
r-I .
it
CA
PAMN G-
Lu
Jz
4%A
M PKi N 6-
SPACZ
fb? T M
y9my
furr- twtr_
,-� tLv/
WH
-DISPLAY
0' g
SARUING aM/7-
WALK- IN
Fl.. MAL
COO LE fzv
slwIv gfac,5 Awy
CASH
WOP
Fk,Om-r WgPEHEAP AAA -2�a:29--
POOR—
QJ7S1()77,9L-
OR- /0 141AI,