The URL can be used to link to this page

433 SPRAGUE ST.pdfI I EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF EDMONDS EDMONDS, WASHINGTON APPLICATION TO HEARING EXA.MlNER FOR CONDITIONAL USE-PER11,'IT File No OU-OZ-8�0 Date 5-*-8to Fee- Z.,50. oo APO'S V Rect. No. 5 7"f .6 IIEAR114C DATE la/161/y/0 -- r--7- 1/, 0,�� I 0;L0.1pov, APPLICANT: M-ftZLJAr1-J(,e;ADDRESS �;l I � 11 - I PHONE.--622-?,ji.e)+44 Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: W%U�lAtM OWNER: <-�L- AAJe-3 DDR-ESS 4W�) �g446',Lm PHONE_77!q: Ig 15 LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS) -a>-3�, FAOM OA�) IQ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY To be completed by the Planning Division: Use Zone AM 1.5 Legal description checked and approved by': Date: VICINITY SKETCH: PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EYLAMPLE, INDICATING NORTH. Exammle: I CONDITIONAL USE REQUIESTED: DETAILS 07 PROPOSED USAGE: I As Dwz>e AfA(r—1 %4-- - Signatd-re of ApplieVant , r or Representative L-11-7 R.E7LEASE/HOLD HAF-MLESS AGR.EEvENT The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing.the application agrees to release, indemnifv,' defend and hol� the City of Edmo�ds har-mless from anv and all damaRes and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from anv action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomolete infor-mation furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERIMISS-101N TO ENTER SUB TECT PROPERTY The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its Dermission for public of"icials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject propercv for the purpose of'insoection and posting attendant to this application. /7— A- Sipnat—ur6- of —AvDlic V, t , Oune�/ or ReDresentative 7 7)0 MINITY MAP EXHIBIT'4 CASPE *111, CU-22-86 6Z 620 I 6L, 615 6)l 611 60B 607 1 00 601 605 SCALE' kv FEeT NORTH pu,5E-r 50UND 426 601 14 D7 A 32 Co 4E GE 03 'Alc 05 429 417 Jiloo ?21 31 El 01 1 14081 M I 50 > 00 4z� a A� B Rlq NOW SPV WE z C+ Zee, .2b, eso N '9/4, /?d 46? A", <017 all ")6 ro BELL A, Ab ds I I A I-VNIN /Z.3 IUD MAIN DANK 1,6 L CA IPA 'rA IN E50Y colvoo fol v %8'0 lu 130 EXHIBIT 5' FILE # ADB-45-86 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE . Description of proposal Proposed two story office and apartment building Proponent William D. Lou Location of proposal, including street address, it any, 433 Sprague Street Lead agency of Edmonds The -lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a prob- able signi'ficant adverse impact on th.e envi*ronment. An environmental impact statement (.EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)('c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on fi*le with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on reques't. There is no comment p . eriod for thi*s DNS. Thi s D NS i's issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on Lhis proposal.for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted b Responsible official Bruce G. Finke Position/title Associate City Planner —Phone 771-3202, ext. 252_ Address 250 Fifth Avenue N., Edmonds, WA 98020 Date May 20, 1986 signature .,[X7X You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to James M. Driscoll, Hearing Examiner at 250 Fifth Avenue N., Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 p:m., May 30, 1986 by___f�ling a written appeal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Bruce Finke to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. ,/-xx7 There is no agency appeal. City of Edmonds INTER -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Bobby Mills ary McComas Fire Marshal vt Smi th/jerry Hauth Eng Duane Bowman DATE -�ay 19,1986 FROM TO SUBJECT CU-22-86 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN RM 1.5 ZONE ADDRESS: 433 SPRAGUE STREET HEARING DATE: JUNE 19, 1986 PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER THAN RECEIVED JUNE 3, 1986. MAY 3 01986 THANKS. CITY OF EDMONDS /cIllf-T- 0 .1 RECEIVED PUBLIC WORKS REC E I VE.' City of Edmonds D INTER-OFr( OR NDENC MAY 2 311986 C:1 :TE I 2PPO ",/Bobby Mills Gary McComas P. ctu.cf Fi re Marshal 0—NQ4 Dan*Smith/Jerry Hauth Eng FROM Duane Bowman DATE May 1.9, 1986 TO SUBJECT CU-22-86 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN RM 1.5 ZONE ADDRESS: 433 SPRAGUE STREET HEARING DATE: JUNE 19, 1986 PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER:THAN JUNE 3, 1986. THANKS. F1 CITY OF EDMONDS P U B L I C WORKS DEP.ARTMENT SUSPENSE DATE: TO: LU Uj 0 investigate SuPERINTE,,4DENT and Repo rt OFFICE ADMIN ISTRATOR Take Appropriate Action BUILDINGS & GROUNDSDIV. S-PERVISOR EQUIRMENT RENTAL DIV- SUPERVISM Prepare letter/mernO for my signature STREET DIVISION SUPERVISOR For Information X WATER/SEWEP OIVISIDtl SYPERVI-cOR Previously Ref'd TREATMENT PLANT DIV- SUPERIJISOR S, 'jus of Actioq? a Iteturn to: SECRETARY WORK ORDER COORDINATOR cOMMENTS: DAM F MOMS **City of Edmohkms CI!IE.R-OFFICE CORR�ESPONDENCE D AT E A? -06 TO J�Kl FROM <Z7 SUBJECT s cy <,� S it iiQ E I �V 2 '1 `9 6, 06 CITI� OF EDMO.ND$,' 0 '-$ . . ....... . PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 80'-0" OF 433 SPRAGUE 410 Daley 4342-025-004-0002 Pioneer Bank White Michael D. 02-52001910 4111-200th SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 4342-025-005-0001 412 Daley Security Pacific Mtg. Corp. 3617693 2460 W 26th Avenue Denver, CO 80211 4342-025-007-0000 416 Daley V/1 Peoples Mortgage Co. 3300555 2411-4th Avenue/Box 1788 Seattle, WA 98111 4342-025-008-0008 424 Daley vl-� Prudential Mutual Saving Bank V Trenkamp W. R. 02-001-11825-6 11 00-3rd Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 4342-025-009-0007 Stuestall Lloyd H. V/ 426 Daley Edmonds, WA 98020 452 Daley V-Z 4342-025-010-0012 Pioneer Bank Leake Mary J. 02-52001100 4111-200th SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 4342-025-012-0002 Bradshaw George & Marie Turner David L. & Sue A. 911 Cary Road Edmonds, WA 98020 4342-025-014-0000 Loughrin William D. 433 Sprague Street Edmonds, WA 98020 ' t- MONA 4342-025 -016-0006 421 Sprague /Ghazimorad Roy V 15121 NE 201st Woodinville, WA 98072 4342-025-021-0001 0/4 SPr@:6ue Hansman Melvin S. 712 N 204th Seattle, WA 98133 4342-024-001-0008 403 Sp-r-ag-ae Bryant Fred A Box 9 Edmonds, WA 98Q20 4342-024-003-0006 503 Sprag-ue- Pioneer Bank 2, Bryant Frederick A. 4111-200th SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 4342-024-005-0004 Lots 5-8 Blk G Edmonds City of Edmonds, WA 98020 L4 BVIR01,111041TAL CHECKLIST Purpose or Checklist: The State Environment.111 Policy Act (SEIIA). cliapter 43.21C RC\V. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal b-1-fore making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant advcrt�c impacts on the quality of the crivironmcni. The purpose of this check -list is to provide inforinaLion to help vou and III,'. agency identify imp * acts from \our propos I nd to reduce cy decide whether Lin EIS is required. or avoid impacts from theproposal, if it can be done) and to licip the agen Instructions ror Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agcn ental impacts of your proposal -are signiFicant, requiring cies use this checklist Lo determine whether the cnvironm preparaLion or an EIS. Answer the questions bricn\,. with the most precise information known, or give the best dc- scription you can. �Iou must answer -each question accurately Lind carefufly, to the best of \our knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer Lhe questions from your own observ3tions or project plans without the need to hire exper * ts. If you reallv do not know the ans'Wer, or ir a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap- plv". CoMolet.c answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. oninn, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer Some qu:�stions ask about. governmental reaulations, such as z n al aQ encics can assist you. these queszions if you can. If you have problems, the government - I to do &m over a period of time or on The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan difftrent parcels of land. Atta�h any additional information that I will help descri F be your proposal or its environmental er,fects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask \ou to explain Nour answers or provide additional in- formaLion reasonnbly related to detei mining if there may be significant advcrse impact. Usc or cheCklist for non,proj . --cl proposals: Comole,,- this -checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "dots not apply." IN AD- DIT ION, . COMOI.VL the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). licant," and "prope . rtv or site" For nonproject acTions. the references in Lhe checklist to the words "project," "app should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BAC%GROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: Address and phone number or applicant and contact person: -5 t-))e, A L--) LJ E, Pilo" E. E; 1;� 2-F 4. Date checklist prepared: Z) 041 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Fiz LJ C�D 0 11 TO Ib��_LvNk 0 1 "_�_ 4r_0/_A1 V_� U-T-W 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity rclatcd to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N D 5 a -no, -11 ha, -ill be prepared, direct].), rclatcd to S. List any environmental information you 1. about th. been prepared. Or this proposal. 0't"'J ES 9. Do you know whether applications arc pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If ycs. explain. N 0�'J a I 10. List any government 'approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. I'm te /-A IT- U-bF, ftr4-MIT' Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask vou to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project deSCriDLi0n.) I I F�zcvc'� sjg( vgtsv RLAC—k lot" 017- tR�' t S-V v4 6:" L , �F' f4t"W-Y �PESID&dCE, WIAIC,14 lt3 AS OF: QE Q t4 10 L='e _hE C-01-4 LJ C-T 101-4 W I W AL, 0i:>t�__ T LL� 0'_ A VW-0 rZ -f SM 11 e--70 dC V-J (0 LJ M 0 714 V_ -5 ��;rg U-Jqg.' L-I,- (3 iz' ea 7 Y, 5 A6JO-1149 5E, a-50-70 ^5�' CO VE;ie 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufflicient information for a person to understand the precise location or your pro- posed project, including a stre—, address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a ranae of area. provide the range or boundaries of the siLe(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you arc not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. /�A 0/_4 VD 4--., TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other PL-A I b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? I Fkq�F- r EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY i TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c, Wlilt general types of soils arc found on the site (for example, clay, sand. gravc], peat, muck)? If you kn�w the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. (b &/-A to LOA"/� d. Arc there surface indications or history or unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? Ir so. describe. N 0 c. Describe the purpose. type, and approximate quantities or any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of Ril. lVVA01e. �A-Ff Z, V( U� W (LL�- &IeAro 140 Cp A VVAJ' - //,3T_0 IS LQ I U� (3L5, Vszk�9 Atuo f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use'? If so. aCnerally describe. /IJO a I I .. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for -example. asphalt or buildings)" �a 5 C70 h. Proposed r-Rc-nsures to reduce or control e.-osion. or other impacts to the earEh, if any: /Q 0 ,-4 t� 2. Air a. What types of emissions 10 the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust. automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed'! If anv. ocncrallv describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal'! If so. grierally dcscr&. /__40 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: I EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (301— A a .1 TO M. COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. NVater a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including N,car—round and seasonal streams, s]aliwaicr, lakes, ponds, wc1land.4? If yes, describe type and provide names. If approprintc. state what stream or river it no\A,.s into. NO 2) \Vill the project require any work over. in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please dcs,cribc and attach available plans. 3) Btimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed site that would be affected. In - from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the dicate the source of fill material. /1J 0/11) 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give aencral de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. M 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100—year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. /130 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the t%-pc of waste and antl:'Cipa ted volume or discharge. /00 b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Givc general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. U UP 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sc-.%,age; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number or houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the systcm(s) arc expected to serve. ljot--) f& EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY T M-M t 4� TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method or collection and disposal, if nny (include quantities, if known). \\'here will this water no\&,?Will this water now into other waters? If so, describe. fez F0011crWw'e2'e, 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. A?4�> d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runorf water impacts, ir any: FL/ -0 K& no k A,-> /0 L5, 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: V deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other V evergreen tree: Fir, cedar, pine, other tl shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbasze, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milroil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of ve2etation will be removed or altered? 6�4so:;-' j t IFLOV14' i V%isc- - -51j4e06 S c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. rJo A-) C-2 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: �,p4vO 66AjO V!, j0LJQf,-) A<�C&rKIPA4%.2) MS Af(il-'Je�4P000 I — 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron. eagle. songbirds, other: -50N& e? ................. manimals: deer, bear. elk. beaver, other: ................................... Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: ............................ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. /�7)0&) vt- TO BE COMPUTED [IN' AXPLICANT EVALUATION FOR A(;FNCN' USJ; ()NJ.)' c. Is the site part of I migration routc? If so. explain. A30 d. Proposcd mcasures to prcrcrvc or enhance wildlife, if any: &)o�o Ct, 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of cncrg� (clectric, natural ps, oil, wood stove, solar) will bE uscd to mect the compici,--d project's energy needs? Describ-. whether it will be used for heatinn , manu- facturinn, c1c. 0 IjOA-r Cc)yyl f r7l,� � eo Ae4jai—M;F,�S b. Would your �rqject affect Lhe potential use of sdIar energy by adjacent properties? If so. Qenerally describc. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: &L4z1^-)J Alz 10V-� &,)4;,b4 �A�rrT& aoo 7. Eni-iro ental Health a. Are therc any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. ro 0 /cr ft- 'I 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control criviront-ricrital health hazards, if any: YQ 0 to if, b. Noise 1) What typcs of noise exist in the -area which may affect your projcct (ror example: traffic, cquipmcnt, operation,'othcr)? 00,*-.:rfL 22) What types and IcvcIs or noise would be crcatcd by or associated with the projcct on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- catc what hours noisc would come: from the sitc. 0 T-1+1�, 3 0 F .,-Rae � 127W A-) A F TO IIr . CONWI-ETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N .5 A-D (--,- S. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of t-hc site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used 'for agriculture? If so, describe. MEW c. Describe any structures on the site. I -Cal"U("L'M Aff�,OY- ZOO d. Will anv structures be demolished? If so, what? c. What is the current zonincy classification Or Lhe site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? M LJ LT I - FAM I L%( VZES I'M OTA L-- If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site'? �1 /A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area'? If so, specify. PG) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project'? 1 *-:5 . Approximately how many peopic.would the completed project displace'! p & ej 12, k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: P0 k) V, 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: L;4 (20&)-oO 1 7-0 - Z- ovwur" .410ti —7— I EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO Ill. COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housim. b a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housinn. 4 A ( �J I M�yDOLV_ 1104&rvtCL b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housingo. A-) DfJ IT- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: LI 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of an\ proposed SLrUcture(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior builainc, matc'rial(s) proposed? (�Op av 2 q 'Op'e— i -6TLXLO EVALUATION' FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. "Alhat views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Tq�jj� �tvgcO Of TRV— 1101j"4� 7�1 T-17� f��A`T V;CUU0 (6t An=Me__IrV_*0 . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: F--ooiz - F0 SOFTIt^) MZ f L Liaht and Clare 0 a. What type of light or Eflare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could liE!ht or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? P0 c. What existing off -site sources of light or glarc.may affect your proposal? ti or-,7 M- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreadon a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities arc in the immediate vicinity? I P�M.k_,o b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. pio MM 'i j TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Nofj TL 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Arc there any places or o Jects listed on. or proposed for. national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. �J b. Gencraliv cics'cribe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeolo2ical. scicnLiFic. or cultural im'ortancc know'n to be on or next.to the site. p C. PTODOsed measures to reduce or conLrol,iMDacts, if any: tj 0 'J vt_ 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways Se.-Vir12 the site. and describe proposed -access to -he existing street system. Show on Site �Ians. if a_ny. VIE b. Is site currently served by public transit'? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop'? Aqojogo�— 26 (6(_0CV, c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have*? How many would the project Clirni=C'? L,4LV__,0 kr(P-0-s' -cments to existing roads or d. Will the proposal require an% new ro.ids or streets. or impro� z stree,s. not includina drive-xays'! If so. �_,enerully describe (indicate whether public or private). 1JQ0A de o,�o I fAe, tt,/) . e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediute vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion'? If so. oencrully describe. f. Hu%y mativ vehicular trips per dav would be oenerated by the completed project'! If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BI COMPLETED [IN' APPLICANI g. Proposed incasures to reduce or contiol iransportation in1p;1cls, if an\': 15. Public Ser6ces a. Would the project result in in increased need for public scrvices (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so. pencrally describe. N a b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. /JO/-) I t- 16. Utilities a. C* cl utilities currently available at the sile: C ectr�i. E )ED ceru�sv sCrv_. 3, �sr\'Ye) septic system 011ie ( Itctr1i itar I:e p �hotn e,' s a �n 1 6— b. Describe the utifiLies that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and Lhe neneral construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which mipht 0 — be needed. j4gugAt. djAr--,p WA4W10(;T0W Jkx-rvizAl, 61AS SLUTF-1411Y 600140MIeA e4MV( P.U-D- d5ToW MqJ F.C)r*A,*)t4pS Mvlte4VAt. E.PMONV5 MUNILIFAI� 4" C. SIGNATURE 4551�\L� ITIMNOW9 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead apency is relying on them to make its decision. Sip -nature: ...... ...... ............. Date Submitted: ..................................... d _10— EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY . I TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL s)tci:I, FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Rezones, (do not use this sheet for project actions) EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Code Changes) Ann.exations, etc.) -Because these questions arc very general, it may be helpful to read thcrn in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. Whe-n answering these questions, be awarc of the extent the proposal, or thc.typcs of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a grcatcr intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general Ic I Ms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air; pro- C duction, Storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noisc? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, Fish, or marine life? Proposed m-.-nsur-.s to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection-, such as parks, wil- derncss,'wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, noodplains, or prime farmlands'? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts arc: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans'? _11— 1) 11 Y A I'I'l. I C A N'I TO III: COM111-1.1 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land tj-.,c impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vice-, and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) arc: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Resident Fred A. Bryant Steve Myrwang 304 4th Ave. N. #6 Box 9 311,1, Occidental South Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98104 Resident William Loughrin Resident 403 Edmonds St. Carol Ann Meyers 304 4th Ave. N. #7 Edmonds, WA 98020 433 Sprague St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Pioneer Bank Resident Frederick A. Bryant 304 4th Ave. N. #8 #02-52001643 Edmonds, WA 98020 4111-200th S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 Resident Resident 505 Edmonds St. #1 304 4th Ave. N. #9 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident Resident 505 Edmonds St. #2 304-4th Ave. N. 010, Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident Resident 505 Edmonds St. #3 304 4th Ave. N. #11 'Edmonds, Edmonds, WA 98020 WA 98020 Resident Resident 304-4th Ave. N. #12 505 Edmonds St. #4 Edmonds,'WA 98020 Edmonds, VIA 98020 Resident Resident 304 4th Ave. N. #13 505 Edmonds St. #5 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident Resident 304-4th Ave. N. #14 505 Edmonds St. #6 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 CIA - Zz Pioneer Bank White, Michael D. #02-52001910 4111-200th S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 Michael White/Resident 410 Daley Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Security Pacific Mtg. Corp. #3617693 2460 W. 26th Avenue Denver, CO 80211 Resident/Owner 412 Daley Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Peoples Mortgage Co. #3300555 2411-4th Avenue/Box 1788 .Seattle, WA 98111 Resident 416 Daley St. #A Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 416 Daley St. #B Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 416 Daley St. #C Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 416 Daley St. #D Edmonds, WA 98020 Prudential Mutual Say. Bank W.R. Trenkamp #02-001-11825-G 1100 3rd Ave. Seattle, WA 98101 Resident 424 Daley St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Lloyd Stuestall 426 Daley St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Pioneer Bank Leake, Mary J. #02-52001100 4111-200th St. S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 Resident 452 Daley St. Edmonds, WA 98020 George & Marie Bradshaw David & Sue Turner 911 Cary Road Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 559 Sprague St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Harold & Carolee Hopper 530 Bell St. #1000 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 429 Sprague St. #B Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 429 Sprague St. #C Edmonds, WA 98020 Roy Ghazimorad 15121 N.E. 201st Woodinville, WA 98072 Resident 421 Sprague St. #1 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 421 'Sprague St. #2 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 421 Sprague St. #3 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 421 Sprague St. W4 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 421 Sprague St. #5 Edmonds, WA 98020 Melvin S. Hansman 712 N. 204th Seattle, WA 98133 a THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING THURSDAY, JUNE 19, 19 86 ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.- CU-22-86 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FQ_R PROFE SIONAL OFFICE PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION 433 SPRAGUE STREET ZONE DISTRICT RM-1.5 THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT 7:30 P.M., IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE COMMUNI- TY SERVICES BUILDING, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER. IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY AT THE MEETING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS (PHONE 771-3202, EXTENSION 252). THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE WARNING! OF THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER JUNE 19, 1986 vc'�StQ_a cl vx�Lljlc�dl (o A i 18 L_ ------------- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) Duane Bowman and says: That on the 6th AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER day of June FILE NO. CU-22-86 APPLICANT Steve Myrwang being first duly sworn, on oath, deposes 19 86 , the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Frances Anderson Center and Civic Center, and where applicable on or near the subject property. Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. Residing at FILE NO. CU-22-86 APPLICANT Steve Myrwang AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH Susan Painter being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: That on the 6th day of June —,19 86 , the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. Si. ned- Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of k4dL�- 0/ Notary Public in and for the State of Was�h*n �ton Residing at EXHIBIT LIST CU-22-86 EXHIBIT 1 - STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 2 - APPLICATION EXHIBIT 3 - SITE DEVELOPEMENT PLANS & BUILDING ELEVATIONS EXHIBIT 4 - VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT 5 - DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE 0 .1 EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FILE: CU-22-86 HEARING DATE: JUNE 19, 1986 REQUESTED ACTION: Conditional use permit for a professional office at 433 Sprague Street, Edmonds. APPLICANT/OWNER: Applicant - Steve Myrwang 311 1/2 Occidental Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98104 owner - William Loughrin Carol Ann Meyers 433 Sprague Street Edmonds, WA 98020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit 3 IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS A. Description of the Subi v and Surrounding Area The subject property is an 8,250 sq. ft. lot located in downtown Edmonds. The site is presently developed with a single family residence which is being used as a public accountant's office. The site is flat. The city originally granted a conditional use permit for the accountant's office under file CU-45-75. The applicant is seeking to demolish the existing building and construct a new building that contains a mixture of office and four dwelling units. The Architectural Design Board on June 4, 1986 approved the design of the proposed building. Surrounding development is a mixture of single and multiple family uses. Across Sprague Street to the south is a city employee parking lot. B. Official Street Map 31 4 Staff Report CU-22-86 Page 2 PropDsed R/W Existing_R/W South - 60' 60' North - 15' 15' C. Zoning Ordinance The subject property is zoned RM-1.5, as are the adjacent properties. The city parking lot is designated as Public Use. As conditioned, the requested conditional use permit does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance or the RM-1-5 zone. D. Comp-ehensive Plan The subject property is designated as High and Low Density Residential, as are the adjacent properties. As conditioned, the proposed conditional use permit does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. E. Not Detrimental The proposed use should not be significantly detrimental to the public nor to nearby private property or improvements. A declaration of nonsignificance has been issued on this project under file #ADB-45-86. F. Transferability The permit should be transferable. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of CU-22-86, subject to the following conditions: 1. Comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. 2. The permit should be transferable. RECEIVED JUL 14 1986 LARRY S. NAUGIATEN CITY OF EDIVIONDS CITY OF E.DMONDS (V06) 111 .1202 �.150 501 AVF N EDMONDS. WA!;l IINGION 980:10 HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND DECISION OF' THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION F'ILE: CU-22-86 OF STEVE MYRWANG FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DECISION: The conditional use permit is qranted subject to the conditions listed. INTRODUCTION Steve myrwang, 311-1/2 Occidental, Staite 300, Seattle, Washington, 98104, and hereinafter referred to as Applicant, has requested approval. of a conditional use- permit for the allowaince of a professional office at 433 Sprague Street, Edmonds, Washington, and on property more particularly described as: Lots 14 and 15 and the East-- 1-1,11f of Lot 16, Block 11, Cj.ty of Edmonds, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of 1:)lats, pages 38 and 39, records of the Auditor of the County of silohomi.sh, State of Washington. A hearing on the request was held before the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds on June 19, 1986. At -the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: Duane Bowman Planning Dept. City of Edmonds Edmonds, WA 98020 Steve Myrwang 311-1/2 Occidental Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98104 At the hearing the following exhibits were submitted and admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: Exhibi.t 1 - Staff Report 2 - Application 3 - Site Development Plans & Building ]Elevations 4 - Vicinity Map 5 - Declaration of Nonsignificance Findings and Decisf, .,i of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds Re: CU-22-86 Page 2 After due consideration of the evidence presented by the Applicant; evidence elicited during the public hearing; and, as a result of the personal inspection of -the subject property and surrounding areas by the Hearing Examiner, the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions constitute the basis of the decision of the Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The application is for the approval of a conditional use permit for the allowance of a professional office at 433 Sprague Street, Edmonds, Washing -ton. (Staff report.) 2. The subject property is an 8,250 square foot lot that is located in downtown Edmonds. It is developed with a single-family resi- dence -that is currently used as a public accountant's office. It is the intent of the Applicant to demolish the existing building on site and construct a now building that will contain a mixture of office and four dwelling units. (Bowman testimony and Staff report.) 3. The subject property is zoned RM-1.5. Section 16.30.010(C)(1) of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) requires -that offices in an RM-1.5 zone obtain a conditional use permit. (ECDC.) 4. The surrounding developme nt of the subject property is a mixture of single-family and multi -family uses. Across Sprague Street to the south of the subject property is a city employee parking lot. (Staff report.) 5. In order for a conditional use permit to be granted within the City of Edmonds the criteria as set forth in Section 20.05-010 of the ECDC must be satisfied. These criteria include: A. The proposed use must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the city of Edmonds; B. The proposed use in its location must be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance in which the property is located; C. The proposed use must not be significantly detrimental to.the public health, safety or welfare, nor injurious to nearby private properties or improvements; and, D. The Hearing Examiner shall determine whether the conditional use permit shall run with the land or shall be personal- (ECDC.) 6. The Applicant submitted a site plan showing the proposed development. As submitted on the- site plan all the structures in the deve.,lopinerit of the subject propet-ty satisfy the RM-1.5 Findings and Decis( i of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds Re: CU-22-86 Page 3 zoning standards. (Exhibit 3.) 7. Eight parking spaces will be available on site. This is adequate parking and satisfies the parking standards for the City of Edmonds in this particular zone. ( (Exhibit 3 and ECDC.) 8. The subject property is designated as High and Low Density Residential. 'I ' 'he adjacent properties have the same designation. (Staff report.) 9. The proposal has been submitted to the Edmonds Architectural Design Board (ADB). one June 4, 1986, the ADB approved the design of the proposed building. (Staff report.) 10. The Planning Department of the City of Edmonds has recommended approval of the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements. 2. The permit should be transferable. 11. No adverse testimony was received at the public hearing. CONCLUSIONS 1. The application is for the approval of a conditional use permit for the allowance of a professional office to be located at 433 Sprague Street, Edmonds, Washington. Because the property is located in an RM-1.5 zone a conditional use permit is required for the proposed use. 2. In order for a conditional use permit -to be granted within the City of Edmonds the criteria as set forth in Section 20.05.010 of the ECDC must be satisified. with conditions the proposed development satisfies these criteria. 3. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds and the High and Low Density Residential designation of the subject property. It is consistent with Section 15.20.005 Residential Development of the ECDC which Density sets forth the goals and policies for tfte High and Low Residential designations. 4. The proposed development and the requested conditional use permit areconsistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinances of the City of Edmonds. In particular it is consistent with the pur- poses as set forth in Section 16.00-010 of the ECDC and the purposes as set forth in Section 16.10-000 of the ECDC. Also, the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the RM Multiple Residential zoning as set forth in Section 16.30.000 of the ECDC because it reserves the regulated area for a variety of housing types, but still maintains the residential environment. it also provides for a use that is compatible and complements Findings and Decisl i of -the Hearing Examiner of -the City of Edmonds Re: CU-22-86 Page 4 the multiple residential use. 5. The proposed office use will not be detrimental to the public nor to nearby private properties or improvements. 6. There is no public necessity for the proposed development. 7. The proposed conditional use permit should be transferable. 8. The Planning Department of the City of Edmonds has recommended approval of -the conditional use permit subject to the conditions as set forth in Finding #10. DECISION Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions; the testimony and evidence submitted at the public hearing; and, upon the impressions of the Hearing Examiner at a site view, it is hereby ordered that the requested conditional use permit be granted. The specific request is for the allowance of a professional office to be located at 433 Sprague Street, Edmonds, Washington, and is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant is to comply with all Architectural Design Board requirements and approvals. 2. The conditional use permit shall be transferable and shall be recorded with -the Snohomish County Department of Records. 3. The Applicant is to secure all other necessary permits from the City of Edmonds prior to construction. authority granted Entered this;ik fday of July, 1986, pursuant to the the Rearing Examiner under Chapter 20.100 of the Community Develop- ment Code of -the city of Edmonds. S M. DRISCOLL ing Examiner NoTfti--,,/6F RIGHT TO APPEAL Written appeals alleging specific error of fact or other grounds for appeal may be filed with -the Planning Department, City of Edmonds, Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Rearing Examiner's final action. In this matter any app 1 must be received by the Department prior to 5:00 p.m. 011 " iruly 1986. 9 t