495 2ND AVE N.PDFiiiiiiiiiiii
4777
495 2ND AVE N
PLANNINGDATA
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
I[ STREET=FILE 1.
Name: C \,,, (3, e, <L-
Date: '3 , �- , ) 1�
Site Address:
Tax Parcel tV7 6 V-360(66() ()o
Project Description: V1
Plan Check #: -�; -3c
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES NO)
Zoning:
Map Page:
Corner Lot: (YES NO)
Flag Lot: (YES
Critical Areas Determination k3
El Study Required
waiver
SEPA Determination:
11—Exempt
El Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading)
0 Fee 0 Checklist O'� APO List with notarized form
Required Setbacks
Street:
Said: 5—
Side:
el S—
Rear:
( S--
Actual Setbakks
Street:
S , ide:
Side:
Rear:
El Detached structures:
El Rockeries:
El Fences/Trellises:
El Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation:
O'Stairs/D'eck:
Height
Datum Point:
Datum Elevation: 10
Maximum Height Allowed:
Actual Height:
Other
Parking Required:
Parking Provided: a e- e
Lot Area:
Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed:
L�� 5
Lot Coverage Calculations: -t- /00 :7-
ADU Created: (YES NO)
Subdivision: 0 0
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES NO)
Comment5
I
Plan Review By:
V,
Planning Data Form V-14-09.doc
PLANNING DATA
Plan Review By:
Planning Data Form 07-14-09.doc
#E82
City of Edmonds
Development Information
OV EDAf
'0
C) rj R, EC
22 2013
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
C" OFEDMONDS
Growth and development within the City creates additional demands and needs for public
facilities. A proportionate share of the cost for these facilities shall be mitigated through
the payment of traffic impact fees. Traffic impact fees are regulated under Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 18.82.
Traffic impact fees shall be collected from any applicant seeking development approval from the city
as provided in 18.82.030. This shall include, but is not limited to, the development of residential,
commercial, retail, office, and industrial land, and includes the expansion or change of existing uses that
create a demand for additional public facilities. I
Timinja and calculation of fees: Impact fees shall be assessed based upon the road impact fee rates in
effect at the time of issuance of the building permit, including but not limited to, change of use permit or
remodel permit. In the event the development activity does not require a building permit, traffic impact
fees will be assessed at the time of issuance of the business license. The 2009-Impact Fee Rate Table
(pg 3 of handout) shall be used to determine the applicable ITE Land Use Category and associated per
unit impact fee rate. 1
— Calculatin2 impact fees for a change in use: For a change in use of an existing building or
dwelling unit, including any alteration, expansion, replacement or new accessory building,
the impact fee shall be the applicable impact fee for the ITE land use of the new use, less an
amount equal to the applicable impact fee for the ITE land use of the prior use, established
at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to 9/12/04
(adoption of Ordinance 3516), the 2004-Impact Fee Rate Table (pg 4 of handout) shall be
used.
Impact Feefor NEW use — Impactfeefor PREVIOUS use = Impactfee 2
— Independent Fee Calculation: An Independent Fee Calculation 3 may be submitted in
accordance with ECDC 18.82.130 if none of the fee categories or fee amounts set forth in
the 2009-Impact Fee Rate Table describe or capture the impacts of a new development.
Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet: Complete the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Worksheet or
prepare a traffic impact analysis report that complies with and addresses the City of Edmonds TIA
Checklist. The TIA worksheet is attached to this handout and is available on line.
Payment of fees:, Impact fees shall be paid at the time of issuance of the building permit or city
business license.
Exemptions: ECDC 18.82.040 identifies particular development activities in which exemptions may
apply. Please refer to this code section for additional information. The director shall make the final
determination as to whether the exemption applies.
' Impact fee rates can also be referenced in ECDC 18.82.120.
2 No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative.
3 $200 review fee required plus actual cost of outside consultant review if required by City.
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Page I of 4
PROJECT EXAMPLES
Types of proiects that DO NOT trigger impact fees: The following list is intended to provide
examples of projects that are exempted from the payment of traffic impact fees as identified in ECDC
18.82.040. The examples provided do not involve a change in use and do not expand the usable space
or add any residential units and therefore, do not create additional demand on the roadway system.
Traffic impact fees will not be required as a condition of development approval for these types of
projects.
El A project that involves demolition of one single family residential unit and replacement with
one new single family residential unit on the same lot.
El A residential remodel that does not increase the number of residential units.
0 A residential addition (e.g. garage, etc.) that does not increase the number of residential
units.
0 Decks, fences, retaining walls, etc.
0 Accessory dwelling unit (ADU). (Approval of an ADU is regulated by the Edmonds
Community Development Code, which limits the total number of individuals living at the
property to one "family" as defined in the code)
Types of proiects that DO triner impact fees: The following project examples do increase the
number of residential units or involve commercial or other activity using the roadway system and
therefore, do create additional demand on the roadway system. Traffic impact fees shall be required as a
condition of development approval for these types of projects.
0 Construction of a single family residence on a previously undeveloped, vacant or subdivided
lot.
El Demolition of a single family residence and construction of a commercial, mixed -use or
multi -family facility or duplex on the same property.
0 A tenant improvement that changes the use from general office to medical office.
0 Remodel of an existing multi -family building that increases the number of residential units.
Note: This information should not be used as a substitute for City codes and regulations. The
Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) may be viewed at
www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/codes.stm. The applicant is responsible for ensuring compliance
with the fees and regulations that are applicable at the time of submittal. If you have a
specific question about a certain aspect of your project, please contact the Engineering
Division at 121 Fifth Avenue North, (425) 771-0220. Please note that other local, state,
and/or federal permits or approvals may be required.
Revised on 6124110 . E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Page 2 of 4
2009 - Impact Fee Rate Table
EdmandsSireals and Roac(s impact Fee Rate Sfudj�
TABLE 4
IMPACT FEE RATES
Q)
(2)
(3)
(4)
.(5),
(6)
.Trip
ITE ' ITE Land Use
Trip
% New
Lw9th
Net New Trips per
Impact Fee Per Unit @
'Code Category
Rate'
Trips'
Factor'
-Unit of measure-
$1,049.41 Or Trip
110 Light Industrial
0.97
100%
11.47
1A3 1,000 sq ft
1.S0 per square foot.
140 Manufacturing
0.73
100%
1.47
1.07 1,000 sq ft
1.12 'per square foot
151 Minl-warehouso
0.26
100%.
1.47
0.38 1,000 sq ft
0.40 W square foot
210 Single. family House
11,01
100%
1.13
1.14 &-ailing-
1,196.33 per dwelling unit
220 Apartment
0.62
.100%
1.20
0.74 dwelling.
776.56 per dwelling unit
230 Condominium
0.52
106%
1.15
0.60 dwelling
629.65 per dwelling unit
240 Mobile Home
0.59
100%
1 , 09
0.64 dwelling
671.62 per dwelling unit
2S t Senior Housing
0.16
100%
0.93
0.15 dwelling
157.41 Oar dwelling unit
Motel
0.47
100%.
1.27
0.60 room
629.65 per room
420 Marina
0.19
100%1
0*97
0.18 berth
188.89 per boat berth
444 Movie Theater
3.80
85%
6.73
�.36, 1,000 sq ft
2.48 per square foot
492 He2lth/Fitnes Club
3.53
75%
1.00
2.65 1,000 sq ft
2.78 Pee square foot
530 High School
0.97
8096
1.00
0.78' .1,000 sq ft
0.82 per square foot
560 Church
0.55
10096
1.20
0.6 6, - 1,000 sq ft
0.69 per square foot
565 Day Care Center
12.46
7�96
0.67
6;26 1,000 sq It
6.57 per square foot.
620 Nursing Home
0.22
10096
0.87
0.19 bad
199.39'perbed'
710 General Office
1.49
0 0%
1.47
1.9'7 1.000 sq ft
2.07 per squaro foot
720 Medtcal Of�ire
3.46
.75%.
T.40
3.63 1.00 ici It
3.81 oar sQuare foot
814 Speclatty Retail
2.71
55%
0.60
0.89 1.000 sq ft
0.93 per square.foot
820 Shopping Center
3.7.3
6S4
0.53
1.28. 1,000 sq ft
1.34 p�r square foot
850 Superm[Aet
.10.50
65%
0.67
4.S7 1.00 1 0 sii ft
4.80 per square foot
852 Convenience mkt
34.57
40%
0.40
5;53. 1,000 sq ft
5.80.'per square foot
1 5�1,6 hours
.912 Ddve4n bank.
2S.82
51S%
0.47
.6.67. 1,000 sq ft
7.00 per square foot
932 Restauranti sit-
11.15
55%
0.78
4A& 1,000 sq ft
4.70 persquare foot
down
933 Fast food, no
26.15
50%
0.67
8.76.1 1,000 sq ft
9.19 per square foot
drive -up
934 Fast food, wl
33.84
51%
0.62
10.70 1,000*sq ft
11.23 pet square foot
drive -up
936 Coffee/Donut
.40.7S
2"
0.67
SA6 1,000 sq ft
5.73 per square foot
Shop, no deive-up
938 Coffee/Donut
7S.00
20%
0.67
10.05 1,000 sq ft
10.S5 per square foot
Shop,drive-up, no
Indoor seating
945 Gas station
13.38
45%.
0.53
3.19. vfp.,
3,3:47-62 per vfps
w/converdence
ITE Trip Generation (8th Edition). 4-6. PM Peak Hour Trio Ends
ass' by
Excludes, p Irlps:'see *Trip Generation Handbook;, An ITE Proposed Recommended
Practice" (1988)
A6116 to average trip length,
vfp: vel�[.cle f6 eingposition
Hencietson,
Young &
Cornpany
EFFECTIVE 5/1/2010
City of Edmonds, Washington
dctober 29,2009
Page 21
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Trafflic Impact Analysis Page 3 of 4
2004 - Impact Fee Rate Table
Edmonds Poad Impact Fee Rot& Study
TABLE
4
IMPACT FEE
RATES,
(1)
M
(3)
(4)
'(S)
(6)
Trip
ITE ITE Laind Usb
Trip
04 N6w
Length
Not Now Trips p or
I' pact Fed Rer'Unit @ $
m
Cc . ide Category
Rate'
Trips'
Factor'
Unit of Measure
763.66'ber Trip.
110 Ugh� Industrial
0.98
100%
1.59
1.56 1,000 sq ft
1 J 9 per. square foot
.140 Manufacturing
0'.74
100%
1 59r
1,18 1,000 sq ft
0.90 per square foot
1S1 Minli-warehouse..
0.26
100%
1.59
0.41 1,000 so ft
0.32 per square foot
210 Sin&- family.
1.0t
06%
1.09
1.10 dwelling
840.72 per dw'elllng unit
Home
220 Apaqrnent
0.62
100%
1.15
0171 dwelling
544.49. per, dwelling unit
230 Condominium.
0.54,
1009,61
1.15
O.6Z dwellinn
474.24 per dwelling' unit
240 Mobile ' 'Horne
0.561
100%
1.09
0.61 dwelling
466A 4 per'dwelling unit
310 ilotel
b* , 61
IOU%'
11.8
67'6 room
582.Z9 per room
.32 . 0 Motal
0.47
100%
1.25
O.S9 room
448.'65 per room
420 Marina
19
0.19
0:3
100%,
0,97'
0.1B berth
140.74 rer boat berth
430 Golt course
030
100%
1.00
0.310 acre
229.10 per acre
444 Movie Theater
100%
0.72
214 1,600 so ft
1.36 got. square foot
492 Racquat club
1.83
100%
0.97
V.78 1,0100 sq ft
3.58 Fer square'foot
53D High School -
1.02
100%
0.'6 2
6.63 1,60o sq ft
0.48 per square foot.
560 Church
0.66
100%
1.15
1 0.76 1,000 sq ft
0.58 per sguare.foot.
610 1-16spital
0.92
100%
1.56
1.44 1,000 sq ft
1. 1.0- per square foot
620 Nursing home
020,
"1.49
10.0%
0'.87
.
0.17 bed
132.88. per bed
710 General oiflc:e.
1 00%.
1. 59
2.37 1,000 sq it
.1.81 pei�square foot
7ZO Medical offidd.
3.66
1,00%
1.50
5.'49 1,000 sq it
4.19, pot square foot
820 Shopping Center.
3.74
81%
0.40
121 V,000 sq it
0.93 per square foot
.832 ikestaurant': sit-
10.86-
56%
1.06
6.45 1 000 sq f i
4.9Z per squafe foot:
down
I
833 Fast food, no,
26.15
52%
0.*62
8. 3 1,000 sq ft
6.44 O.er square foot
drive�up
834 Nst'fo��,- wt
33.46
.51%
0.6Z
11.0.59 1-POOO sciA
8.08 pjef*.squar6 fobt.
d.rive-up
844 Gas stat I ion.
14.56
60%
0.53
4.63 pump'
3 535.82 p6r vfp
845 Gas�station
13.38
-47%
0.53
3.33 pump
2,S45.26'per VfW
w/convenience
850% Supermarket
11.51;
55%
0.65
4; 1, 1 1,000 sq. ft
.3.14. per square foot'
�,851 C664'enieb'ce
53.7i
�3996
0.40
6118 1,000 bq ft
6.40 persiq'bare foot.
rn I arket-24 lit
912 Drive - In Bank
S4.77,,
51%,
0.47
13.13 1,000 sq ft,
10.03r per square foot
2 ITE Trip Generation (6th Edition): 4-6,PM Peak Hour Trip Ends
Excludes pass -,by lilps: see !'Tilp Generation Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recorhrriended
Practice'. (1908),
1 Outio. to! ovefdge trip length..
� vfp:. Yeticle fuelln'o p6sillon*
Hencreison;
Younf;
Com,pany
EFFECTIVE 9/12/2004
City of Edmonds, Washington
Aloiti 15, 2003
Page Is.
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Page 4 of 4
City of Ed,,m6n'ds
. � �t . ... :
Traffic Impact Analysis Worksh.eet
Name of Proposed Project: Cttiv'�06 I n S tkveia wel i mo cz
Owner/Applicant
,30tq�06
Name
110
Street/Mailing Address
Vp ft a PO-17 OILD
city State Zip
Telephone:
Applicant Contact Person:
Name
Street/Mailing Address
city
Telephone:
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable):
Firm Name
Telephone:
THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
Contact Name
E-mail:
State Zip
Project Traffic Levels
Sections to Complete
1. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated
I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist)
11. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated
All sections
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a. Location - Street address: 46A 15 'Le tj - 0 n rl P017- 1 W A 0 U
11 1
a vicinity map and site plan.)
b. Specify existing land use: %IhCHPT Lk-t.JV
c. Specify proposed type and size of development: *10&LE F"11,q VV2117"IZ,
if
.)4;�_'; e;,.-V. (# of residential units andlor squarefootage of building)
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Trajjic Impact Analysis Worksheei Page I of 5
d. Date construction will begin and be completed: "VAL- 1,00)
so
e. Define proposed access locations: 'Qf2-AV 618tLLe a —
f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations:
2. TRIEP GENERATION.'�"-
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic
PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak dayals�b_-a-p'oly ��.difedted. 6y tb*d.City Engine�r)
a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour Trips
IN
OUT
c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour Trips
IN
OUT
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips:
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Trajfic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5
3. TRIP DISTRIEBUTION
Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For
developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require
trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.'
4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements?
b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis:
Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City ofEdmonds Traffic Engineer
Existing Conditions
LOS
Delays
Year of Opening
LOS
Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of
LOS
I
I
Delays
I
I
Land Use
c. Describe channelization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths):
50%
95%
Existing Conditions
Year of Opening
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident history 2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
1 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department
2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.
a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years
after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS
a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments I must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
LOS
LOS
Existing Conditions
Existing
Delays
Year of Opening
With Project
Without Project
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
With Project
I
Without Project
I
b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
' A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5
rT-
7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic
impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached)
and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations
in ECDC 18.82.130.
0 C1111ANGE IN USE
Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was pen-nitted. If the
previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04),
the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used.
Units in
Per Unit square feet,
ITE Land Use Category Fee Rate # of dwelling,
vfp, etc.
New Use $ X
Prior Use $ X
New Use Fee: $ Prior Use Fee: $
11 NEW DEVELOPMENT
Fee
Units in
ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee
Fee Rate of dwelling,
vfp, etc.
New Use F r-- rz- 0) $ 5:1 X I = $ lig(0.31
0 OTHER
MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION:
$ 0q(o,-;-3
INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+consultant fee)
S 01
TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
I $ %0' -13 1
City of Edim'onds, Engineering Division Approval
'-/ 17,,,h
Date
' No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative.
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5
cvrldpo,�, V41
CA -KIT, I rl � L jk� kvt - I
City of Edmonds
Site Classification Worksheet
Page 1 of 2
OT- ED
The project's Site Classification will dictate the specific stormwater management
requirements applicable to your site. Completing this worksheet will help determine the amount of
regulated impervious surface and whether your project falls into the classification of a Small Site
(Category 1 or Category 2), or a Mnor Site. Please reference the Glossm (pp. 10-11), Figures D and
E, (pp. 8-9), and Examples (pp. 11-12), to assist with completion of this worksheet.
1) Is Permeable Pavement' Proposed'For Use on this Site?
Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 5.1 El Yes El"No
If YES, the subject area is to be considered impervious for initial site classification purposes. Include total
permeable pavement area in the calculation of Non -Regulated. ReDlaced and/.or New impervious surface
areas in the table below.
2) Deterrnin6.' the Amount and Type'of Existing & Proposed Impervious Surface for the Site
Refer to Stonnwater Supplement Chapter 2 and Fig. C
Line 1: ldentif� the Non -Regulated Impervious Surface Area.
Line 2: Identify the Replaced Impervious Surface Area, dividing the total between Exempt and ReRulated; either or both
may be zero. Note: For project classification purposes, Replaced Impervious may only be considered exempt
under certain conditions. Refer to the Glossary and Figure D.
Line 3: Identify the New Imperviou ' s Surface Area for your project. All impervious areas created post -July 7, 1977 or
after the date of annexation into th6 City are regulated & should be included in this total unless they can be
categorized separately as a Replaced -Regulated area.
Line 4: Enter the sum of the total Replaced -Regulated plus the total New impervious areas.
Line 5: Identify the total area currently mitigated by an existing city -approved stormwater management system.
Line 6: Enter the sum of the value in Line 4 less the value in Line 5 to identify the total Regulated area in which
stormwater controls have not yet been applied.
Line 7: Identify the. total area proposed to be mitigated through the use of Low Impact Development Techniques.
Line 8: Identify the total area proposed to be mitigated through conventional Stormwater Management Techniques.
** Provide a copy of the following table on the drainage plan sheet for the proposed project
Line
Type
Area (square feet)
1.
Non -Regulated
Exempt
Regulated
2.
Replaced
4.
New (Post 1977) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Total Regulated Impervious Area
Mitigation required if in excess of 2000sf
+
G 6C1.", 7
5.
6.
Total Area Mitigated by Existing Stormwater Management System(s)
Regulated Area Not Yet Mitigated
7.
Area Proposed to be Mitigated. by Low Impact Development Techniques
8.
Area Proposed to be Mitigated through Conventional, SWM Techniques
(e.g. porous asphalt, porous concrete, paver blocks, concrete open cetled paving grids, or plastic lattices filled with fq—%
Revised on 310512012 E72-SWM�_Erosion_Control-03.05.12.doc Page 5 of 12
11B 27 2013
6TREET FILE 13EvELOPMEW SER\('CES CTR'
CITY OF EDMOND6
A E
City of Edmo''n'ds
U)
.Site Classification Worksbeet
P
Page 2 of 2 '7C.
3) Determine the Total Area of Land Disturbing Activity sf
. Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 8
14) Determine the Quantity of Grading, Fill and/or Excavation __-La cy I
5) Will the project convert N4 Acre or -More of Na . tive Vegetation to Lawn or El Yes � No
Landscaped Area?
6) Identify the Watershed the Existing Site Runoff Discharges to
Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 2.3
Based on Site Location and Watershed Map — Figure-C. Check all that apply.
A. EErbirect Discharge B. Creek or Lake Basin
Ei Edmonds Way Basin
o Puget Sound Basin
24uglet Sound Piped Basin
DETERMINE PROJECT CLASSIFICATION USING THE INFORMATION ABOVE
AND THE PROJECT CLASSIFICATION CHART (Figure B, pg 4)
V.Small Site - Category 1 El Small Site - Category 2 0 Minor Site
Stormwater Supplement Stormwater Supplement Stormwater Supplement
Chapter 5 Chapter 5 Chapter 6
Revised on 31051*2012 E72-SWAI�_Erosion—Control-03..05.12.-doc
Page 6 of 12 -
IL E
July 17, 2013
Robert W. Crump
501 - 2nd Ave. North
Edmonds, WA 98020 RECEIVED
JUL 18 2013
City of Edmonds DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Building Division COUNTER
121 Fifth Ave. North
Edmonds, WA 98020 RlEcavm
Re: New Construction - 495 2nd Ave. North JUL 2 2 2013
To Whom It May Concern: EIVC'/VEERIIVG DIVISIOIq
I live next door to -pro perty located at 495 - 2nd Avenue North in Edmonds
'k
that currently has a ne w* residence being built on it. I want to state my concern
about the winter water rUni-off that I receive from that property.
I have lived at my address for 36 years and have had to deal with Water
runoff from the property every winter. I get standing water ponding in my back
yard and also flooding in my crawlspace. The soil in this area is clay and water does
not percolate into the earth, but only moves horizontally from one lot to the next.
It is my hope that during the construction of this residence that adequate
drainage is installed to move this water to the 2nd Avenue storm drainage system.
Please advise me on what action is going to be taken to minimize the water problem.
Thank you,
Robert W. Crump
cc: Rick Hedges - Adjoining Property Owner
376 Sunset Avenue - Edmonds, WA 98020
All
Ago
O'k
AN
p
SO
'Play f
1 !44 .
Oo
wt
MIJ);
MM
44,
9.1
ilk
vm.
IC
V4 pp'll
wj�r' 'At
tf,
Vf
OF,
46
tl'F
At
Olt �
"r 41
1 01
f "Y�
Ak
4c) T-
,4 "
1"r
1k,
lQiZ
-AX!
V"
A "i'l, (I
I b
a'o
--lop
Ll
41
1, It7
41K
ol
a,
IL
4r-
Ayl
9
li
, SA,
'Ak
- 13`010REET FILE
Certificate of Occupancy
Building Division
This certificate is issued in accordance with the requirements of Section 111 of the 09 International Building Code
certifying that at the time of issuance this single family residence was in compliance with theapplicable provisions of
the codes and ordinances of the city regulating construction and use of buildings.
Description: 64 -Single Family Residence New
Site Address: 495 2ND AVE N, EDMONDS Permit No: BLD20130193
Construction Type: V13 Parcel No: 27032300106000
Owner: JOANNE & DONALD CHASE/ McLAREN Occupancy 6roup: R-3/U
495 2ND AVE N
EDMONDS, WA 98020
#13t�ljding Official
POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE
06/25/2014
Date Issued
C15,
'o I-+ - C91F ,
QMN
Ld
M LJ
z i2 I
;tuc!o
-M a
CL
ul =1 OR
tA .0z'00.99
CENTERLINE B
REMOVE--
iEXIST. FRUIT
1TREE
23'
wo
1-2-2,74'�
3 OZ,00.99
DECK
z
I La)
0
c�
c�
Ln
2 in
LO M C'4
Lo
c6 uj
0) ch
V)
5ANI TART
SEMER EASEMENT.
REC. NO. 201007225001:
.,,L10
06 19'
1w
121.569
z
PROPOSED EDENCE�
J
ml a
TERRACE
11w. 1
Zonie.,-Xs—
Comer
Setbacks Reguired A zu kal
Front
Sides Ql�
Rear :,SITE PLAN
Other-------- I" =.20'
DRIVE
294
Ld
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT ADDRESS
495 SECOND AVE. N.
C)
EDMONDS, WA 98020
OWNERS
JOANNE CHASE AND DONALD MCLAREN
0
110SUNSETAVE.N.
EDMONDS, WA 98020
z
TAXPARCEL
27-0323-001-060-000
LEGAL DESCREPTION
98-1
LOT 2, CITY OF. EDMONDS SHORT PLAT
No. PLN2OD90045, RECORDED ON JULY 22,2010,
z
UNDER RECORDING No. 201007225001, RECORDS OF
I
C) 4M
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
ad P�i 4
0 Im 0)
ZONING
ZONE RS-6
M > >
PROJECT DESCRIMON
cj rx Z- K
NEW CONSTRUCTION SrNGLE-FAM[LY RESIDENCE.
BUILDING AREAS
HEATED SPACE: 1568.5 S.F.
GARAGE: 275.0 S.F
�kfWl)
1943.5 S.F
CD
STORAGE ATTIC: 1120.0'S:F.'
1112.1-11
1
DECKS: 510.0 S F.
lz
'a
TERRACE: 190.0
S'.F.
.100
�%
LOT COVERAGE
17�
LOT TAGE,
7201.353 S.F.
cc
0
LOT
HOUSE:
1568.50 S.F.
ATTACHED GARAGE:
275.00 S.F.
ED
DECKS:
310.50 S.F.
COVERED PORCHES:
100.75 S.F.
�ENTRY
VALKWAY,
I
z
EAVES:
110.50S.F.
L GE,
2365.25 S.F.
RCENTAGE OF COVERAGE:
32.84%
--0- do�
HEIGHT CALCULATIONS:
POINT A: 99.5'
POINT B: 97.17'
POINTC: 101.7'
POINT D: 10015'
0 v)
AVERAGE GRADE: 99.6475'
EIGHT:
124.6475'
Ln
ACT -UAL FILDG. HEIGHT:
123.4175'
M
J
Z
EvtPERVIOUS SURFACE cALcuLATjopis
i
0 t
u rn z
: HOUSEIGARAGE FOOTPRINT:
1943.50 S.F.
C)
Ljj
EAVES:
COVERED PORCHES:
1 10�50 S.F.
100.75 S.F.
L)
RvIPERVIOUS WALKWAYS:
175.00 S.F.
DRIVEWAY:
430.00 S.F.
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES:
2659.75 S.F.
Height �3--77
OV YPLANNING
y
Tt4 4-1—
-APPROVED BY�NGINEERING
; RESUIB
'e 6vuWl'--U 4 TSSC- OUV%3 V-O%E-
14 APR - 12013
Dab; Li A q 113 6T EET FILE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
. i CITY OF EDMONDS
nur
w
lz
han;
(A =1 I-
tA OZ, 9 N e-y-v-
SiLtAr,
Lilt �3:11
a AEMOVIE—
.2 !EmsT FRurr
k)I fni
-'Z
AL,
3 11.6,;
Ila,
-
PROJECT INFORMATION
0
Li
PROJECT ADDRESS
495 SECOND AVE. N.
EDMONDS, WA 98020
C,
OWNERS
l,z 0
in
JOANNE CHASE AND DONALD MCLAREN
(16 bi
CD 0
110 SUNSET AVE. N.
EDMONDS, WA 98020
40
0
1 �/%
I/V
TAX PARCEL
NEYRR
cc
x
27-0323-001-060-000
EASMENT.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
REC. NO. 201007225001-
LOT 2, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT
I I
AW
No. PLN20090045, RECORDED ON JULY 22,2010,
UNDER RECORDING No. 201007225001, RECORDS OF
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
121.569
v
3�
einfaeo
lie
z
I I
(-A4Ns%
ZONING
�Rff AY1 --, .
FILTER SOC cd "i .4
AM im 03
.
ZONE RS-6
PROJECT DESCRIEMON
NEW CONSTRUCTION SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENCE.
.... .. .. ...
nA)OR'
TION: 1QX.167'.
�--CONC.
199 s kH3)KX
J
Ne
ING
BUILDING ARFAS
1568.5 S.F.
HEATED SPACE:
LGE: 275.0 S.F.
TOTAL: 1943.5 S-F.
tT ONSTkVCT ON ENTRANC15 STORAGE ATTIC: 1120.0SY.
DECKS: 510.0 S.F.
TERRACE: 190.0 S.F.
> LOT COVERAGE
LOTSOUAREFOOTAGE: 7201-353 S.F.
6,0 40 3: LOT COVERAGE:
HOUSE: 1568.50 S.F.
"17 < ATTACHED GARAGE: 275.00 S.F.
DECKS: 310.50 SX.
D TESC PLA
. �-� A - �- —
20'
OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSI BLE
FOR Eq0SION-CONTROL AND DRAINAGE
COVERED PORCHES: 100.75 S.F.
SILT FENCE EAVES: 110-50 S.F.
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 2365.25 S.F.
PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE: 32.94%
lot Z
HEIGHT CALCULATIONS:
POINT A., 99.5'
POINT B: 97.17'
POINT C: 101.7'
POINT D, 100.25'
AVERAGE GRADE: 99.6475'
MAX ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 124.6475'
ACTLIAL BLDG, HEIGHT: 123.4175'
U)
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS
L; HOUSE/GARAGE FOOTPRINT: 1943.50 SX.
6 1 Ln: EAVES: 110.50 S.F.
COVERED PORCHES: 100.75 S.F.
i IMPERVIOUS WALKWAYS: 175.00 S.F.
rA w
DRIVEWAY: 430.00 S-F.
N TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, 2659.75 S.F.
L) -I..
7
'R
ESUB t ;w e',-r.
----------
APR — 1 2013
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
5. HAVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSPECTED Hy CITY OF EDMONDS
C)
2. S -ARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS
REFER TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS- UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO
3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER
CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS.
:z
ANY CONSTRUCTION OR SITE CLEARING. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL PRACTICES AND/OR DEVICES
SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL
PERMANENT VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.
4. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINE
RECORD AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. ER OF
z 6. DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURES
S. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
PLANS ON A SET OF "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS AND SHALL
7. ROUGI I GRADE SITE AS REQUMED -1-0 INSTALL DRAINAGE FEATURE S.
SUMMARIZE ALL AS -
BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS 17OR SUBMITTAL
TO THE
19�1
8. CLEAR- GRUB & ROUGH GRADE SITE. REVEGETATE
DISTURBED AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SURFACE DISTURBANCE
OWNER PRIOR PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE. A SET OF AS -
BUILT DR AWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR To
FINAL APPROVAL
IMMEDIATELY AFTER ROUGH GRADING. (OTHER EXPOSED AREAS SHALL 13E
OF THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY/FrNAL PROJECT APPROVAL.
11 STABILIZED PER EROSION CONTROL NOTES BELOW)
6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK
9. INSTALL UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. INCLUDING FRONTAGE
INFORMATION.
IMPROVEMENTS.
7. T14E LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON
13. STA131LIZE AND COMPOST AMEND ALL EXPOSED SOILS PRIOR TO
RI_;VrGETATION 01; ENTIRE SITE.
HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHER S BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM
AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE
ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE
SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY
14. ESTA13LISH LANDSCAPING AND PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY
z
VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTMITY
LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT ANY OTHER
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED UPON FINAL SITE
STABILIZATION AND APPROVAL BY CITY INSPECTOR.
UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY 714E
IMPLEMENTATION OFTHIS PLAN. CONTP ACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION.
C
DEPTIL SIM. TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION
OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. ENGINEER
ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE
EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES
PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS.
ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF CONFLICTS THAT ARISE.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING
FWTW3 0WNS NOT
CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION
SERVICE (1 -800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
TO BrUrffl)l wo
9 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE
PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
> > DE I EN (5 f ST
TKVSYS EM
M:7
IM a- U Fy
z z
10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO
FIELD CONDITIONS.
qr 0
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPYOF THE GEOTECMCAL REPORT
(WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE
HIMSELF WITH
THE CONTE\`TS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT
COMPLIANCE WrM THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF TMS REPORT.
0
ACCEPTABI-ElIG111THN"H
wr�,--Rwv_
12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENI SHALL CONFORM 1-0 THE
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHMCAL REPORT.
DR W)
10
13. MANHOLES. CATCH BASINS. U`TILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON
MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NATIVE I.H. Olt COMPACTED STRUCTURAL
FILL.
A. 0"CH
N1 - 12
IF SOIL IS DISTURBED. SOFT. LOOSE. WET OR IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS
PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION. REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED
STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.
14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DR AWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND
LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS. LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR
EXISTING SITE FEATURES.
�5. SEE ARCHITECTURAL OR AWINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS.
OUNDATION DRAINS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER SITE DRAIN LINES AND
SHALL
BE TIGHTLINED TO TIM STORM DRAIN SySTEMWHERE INDICATED ON
THE PLANS.
0
16. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN
OPERATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT
UNLESS OTHERWISE
APPROVED 13Y THE ENGINEER.
17. ALL ROOF DRAINS. PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS. CATCH BASINS AND
OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHALL BE CONNTCTED TO
THE STORM DRAINAGE
SYSTEM. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
18- CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR
INSTALLATION OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS
INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS.
19. AS A MWM17JM REQUIREMENT. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE
SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR PRECONSTRUCTION
CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND
STANDARDS.
<
20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL HE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER
ACCEPTA13LE METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION OF ON -SITE EROSION
AFTER THE
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL
REQUIREMENTS.
21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES By
SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT
BE ALLOWED WITHOUT
PRIOR APPROVAL.
< Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to
utilkles or frontage improvements In Cih,
y
tight-olLway per City standards that is caused,
L=J I of occurs during the permitted project.
L
z
z
THIS PROJECT 19 NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PR OJECT. BOTH EXPORT
W�D IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED.
23. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED
CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN.
24. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM
5-16 SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET.
25. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND
MAINTAINSHORING AND BRACING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS.
EXISTING BUILDINGS. STREETS. WALKWAYS. UTILITIES AND OTHER EXISTING
AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINSTLOSS OF GROUND
OR CAVING EMBANK.MENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING. AS REQUIRED.
26. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY AND FOLLOW CrIly
PROCEDURES FOR ALL WATER SERVICE. INTERRUPTIONS. HYDRANr SHUTOFFS,
STREET CLOSURES OR OTHER ACCESS RESTRICTIONS. CONMRACTOR SHALL NOT
RELOCATE OR ELIMINATE ANY HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN
APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MAP SHAL.
27. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS. UTILITY
RELOCATIONS AN7D/Olk SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS
AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES
SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH ADVANCE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE
AUTHORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES.
29. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUT- TO
CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND
INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS AND OWNER!S
REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING.
29. NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION. WHERE
NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED. LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS
FIELD ADJUSTMEN7S SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNFEWS REPRESENTATTVL AND
CITY.
30. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING Olt NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS.
PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES
31. . SEE MECHANICAL DP AWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF
Sri E UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING.
32. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR
ELECTRICALWOPK.
33. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHEREAPPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION
SYSTEM.
UJ
UJ w C� ab
it Li Ix C-4 to 141,
z P I LO
00
j-: 0) 0 to M
.0 C6 Ui ^0
r_ 001 1
re)
W V) fill
1z CL
07 IR
lu w A
'0 �� y
ErR EA
rRSEN0. C3 w
SE%ER EASEMENT. it I z
M100.99 _bI 14Z5 REC. INIO. 201007225001
-806"w
1Y " , J.
121.56' ,1 .
LIJ
a REMOVE-
!� EXIST. FRUIT
CENTER.NEB ITREE
z,
z
231.
t W0
1.22.74 -
.3 oz,oan
110"
1�
CN
z
011 (71 Ld 0)
:2 0
F- LLJ
T V) (n
- < C)
F- CL > Lr) LLJ N
0
�_ z
W
Cy)
LO
rM,
L0 vt
d) 0)
CN
IfPow"-MACTta V4otAL*
CONSTRUC`TION SEQUENCE NOTES
1( L I 9-C7 N qakz�- Lota�-T"l_i mr,
z),�,
NOTES
=TERIALS
tA -I
LICI IIIULE A PRE,CONSTRUCTION MEFTIN. WITI I CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION
AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM To
THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS. THE FOLLOWING
A7 425-771-0220. EXT. 1326. TWO DAY (48 HR) NOTICE IS REQUIRED,
SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES. AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL.
M
d4
2-REVIEW TEMPORARY FROSION AND SEDIMENTCOMIROLNOTES.
STATE. AND FEDERAL CODES. RULES AND REGULATIONS:
CURRENT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC)
0
3. �'ALL FOR UTILITY LOCATES.
2012 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD. BRIDGE AND
MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION
- WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
4. INSTALL TESC MEASURES AND MAINTAIN DUSTCON)'ROL WHILE PREVENTING
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
UD
DISTURBANC'E OF ANY AREAS OF VEGETATIONOUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION
(CURRENT EDITION)
dh
ZONE.
-1 F -1 --.7-
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS NOTE: CURBIGUTTER MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED
IF CURRENTLY DAMAGED OR DAMAGED
HOUSE/GARAGE FOOTPRINT: 1843.50 S.F. DURING CONSTRUCTION
EAVES: 110.50 S.F. .11
COVERED PORCHES: 100.75 S.F. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN,
IMPERVIOUS WALKWAYS: 175.00 S.F. 10, J*(XTILI-Ty LIky---S ULOS&IOCI
DRIVEWAY: 430.00 S.F. 'TV3dM%kGlJ C,1" t Mv
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 2659.75 S.F. Ge VAIMWIZiEv- PaA- Ukk;S
-ro
UJI HEIGHT CALCULATIONS:
<
z W vi 0 POINT A: 99.5'
w 10 &
w lij W. cil 16 P_ POINT B: 97.17'
zP I
00 0 t.0 w M POINTC: 101.7'
U1
C6 16
POINT D: 100.25'
(All I V) 0 AVERAGE GRADE: 99.6475'
10 C
E%
R C
FRE
MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT:
1 SANITARY-- im 124.6475
SEWER EASEMENT. - !t�l cl� ACTUAL BLDG. HEIGHT: 123.4175'
kc,09 EC. No. 11� 01
N .201007225001 -
"OZ, 4^lng
N
U
SILT FENCE 121.561 1 ocro Ln,4ATE-,o CATLk4
"I j 'P
--------------------- Z
0
I- U -7/10,00 % , /
SILT FENCE Cd fti4
0
V
CM ow
D py
141
Ld W . . !,
�.y
!DC
29
11?0i�ftlb FLOOR 2>>
REMOI�E- --LLJ
a ,
Y
EXIST FRUIT EUVATION: 191.1671
�CENITERLIN ITREE
4 1 It- NSTRUCTION ENTRANCE'
_C)
_77"
a.
>.z
-'Z
loot )4
... ... go 0-
T4'
WOO. DC
0
�-.CONC. - SILT, FENCE I
'\,I AW
J�
TPWC'' Popwmwm�l
Nil 7
3 0. 9 S AIM J 0. ra
ffLr f.
F1
OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE Ln
in -
FOR EROSION CQNTROL AND DRAINAGE
GRADING AND TESC PLAN
aw
1" 20"
Rem r. i a
A
Y1.
-SDI7- 1 z 5.
Od t1i 4
IDRIVEWAY IM Im 0)
02LOJED �FSEDENCR
M2>>
L) "4 z
Ce
C)
0
_100 IF I
DECK
0
r
LJ
F,� CONC. LCONC.
TgRRACE
1WALKWAY
PORC
11 CL
A83>00 i V)
159.5'
ow 1_�
lu 7 3: 2E '00
0) Li Cr 0 1-,
ZM 20
0% z
z urn
0
0 ur)
SITE P
LAN V) <
.175 a L)
= 205
s.
A OVED B LANNUO
LH 6 - 13
APPR BY ENGINEERING
Date:
SHEET INDEX
SHEET TS
PROJECT INFORMATION
SITE PLAN
STORMWATER PLAN
GRADING PLAN
HEIGHT AND LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONS
SHEET 1
NOTES AND SCHEDULES
SHEET 2
FLOORPLAN
DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES
SHEET3
ATTIC FLOOR PLAN
SHEET4
SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS
SHEET5
NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS
SHEET6
FOUNDATION/FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
FOUNDATION DETAILS
SHEET7
ATTIC FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
STRUCTURAL DETAILS
SHEET8
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
DETAILS
SHEET9
BUILDING SECTIONS
DETAILS
North Ediifonds
0
>
V
Maplewoo
C.2 r
D;31ov St
Edmonds
C <
5 7
Daylk;n 331
aple. 31
Ah
Acer St
<
VICINITY
NORTH
N.T.S.
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT ADDRESS
495 SECOND AVE. N.
EDMONDS, WA 98020
OWNERS
JOANNE CHASE AND DONALD MCLAREN
110 SUNSET AVE. N.
EDMONDS, WA 98020
TAX PARC L
27-0323-001-060-000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT
No. PLN20090045, RECORDED ON JULY 22,2010,
UNDER RECORDING No. 201007225001, RECORDS OF
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
ZONING
ZONE RS-6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NEW CONSTRUCTION SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE.
BUILDING AREAS
HEATED SPACE: 1568.5 S.F.
ATTACHED GARAGE: 275.0 S.F.
TOTAL: 1843.5 S.F.
STORAGE ATTIC: 1120.0 S.F.
DECKS: 5 10.0 S.F.
TERRACE: 190.0 S.F.
LOT COVERAGE
LOTSQUAREFOOTAGE: 7201.353 S.F,
LOT COVERAGE:
HOUSE: 1568.50 S.F.
ATTACHED GARAGE: 275.00 S.F.
DECKS: 310.50 S.F.
COVERED PORCHES: 100.75 S.F.
EAVES: 110.50 S.F.
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 2365.25 S.F.
PERCENTAGE OF C-OVERAGE: 32.84%
fin ONO
--STORM DRAtN
LIFT STRUCTURE
JOP -940
E. IN\
'90.0
-N 31-*59"4001
59048.
Uj
0
0
Aob -
0
A/N
C)
AT
U�
Lo
41)
co
W -0
L-3 �, I
ol
17.
Tj
'STORM
-Alt
DR
w
E ASEMENTO REC:,,
1p
42
23
201.00915011
C\l
.00
55-0:
S 31 *59 40
.... ... ...
S -.3162 �7 4C
. ... ... . . ... .
RIM
INV
sv ®r -770 LE
L T7 =7 5�
...........
E HH
Pin=
v4*1
CD
A
6. CONC LK LEQ.
7A
B.Tv.
a Tv
=Op
T .......
7-1
rj
SD -C
.D 'UR-B
ECE D
I DROP CZ ��Rf
APR 2 5 2014
co
ASPH ALT ..ROADWAY...'..
onwmw MOM.
CB
'.2 N D.: NO-R,-- RK 98.0
'Y. �7
c 9 p -q,;CN 3A N /S
?TPIROWD B INV 30,"50. 0
ON.
w
A
INV .4
/L IL -
s
r-o-K.- 5rMH
a kit
... ............