505 5TH AVE S (6).PDF11111111111111
15360
505 5TH AVE S
I., N. . PdF---,
E D
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
STATUS: ISSUED ENG20070590
Street Use Permit
Peniik Number: ENG20070590
Address of Pubhc Use/Encroachment: 505 5TH AVE S 104, EDMONDS
PROPERTYOWNER BUSINESS OWNER
SNAP FITNESS
505 5TH AVE S
EDMONDS, WA 98020
SIGN ENCROACHING 12" OVER RIGHT OF WAYON 5TH AVE SOUTH
STREET USE: Placement of any temporary or movable objects in any portion ofpublic space or City right-of-way
shall meet all code requirements as setforth in thefollowing chapters of the Edmonds Community Development
Code.
ENCROACHMENT: Permanent structures encroaching upon any portion ofpublic space, City right-of-way or
easement area shall meet all Code Requirements as setforth in thefollowing chapter of the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
CODE APPLICATION. Chapter 18.70, 17.65, and 17.70.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. All
terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as if setforth infull and this permit therefore is subject to
the terms of those chapters.
FOR THE TERMIN WHICH THISPUBLIC USEIENCROACHMENTISINEFFECT, THE OWAIER SHALL COMPL YWITH
THE PERMIT COADITIONS SET FOR TH B Y THIS PERMIT.
NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the owner to be of a temporary nature, shall vest no
permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the City per ECDC
18.70.040. Applicant is responsible to provide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the beginning of
each calendar year, no later than the 2 Ist day of January.
INDEMNITY: 7-he Applicant understands and agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfrom any injuries,
damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the
applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense
of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court cost, and attorneyfees by reason of granting this permit.
In addition, the applicant understands that helshe shallprovide and continually maintain during the term of the
permit a ceritificate of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing
that it shall be primary as to any other policy of insurance.
THIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERNUTUNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HISMER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN
SPACE PROVIDED.
n Printed: Tuesday, January 22, 20C
BY
Al"FILECOPY F-1 INSPECTOR COPY E] APPLICANT COPY
STATUS: ISSUED
ENG20070590
• The proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or pedestrian travel.
• Architectural Design Board Approval has been granted or the process has been administratively approved.
• The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public.
• Items shall be placed adjacent to the building and may encroach onto a maximum of two feet of the public
sidewalk; or in accordance with Bistro and outdoor dining code; or per an approved budding permit.
• Safe Pedestrian travel area, or clear zone, of 44 inches minimum width, providing a level safe waking surface
along the public sidewalk, shall be maintained. (e.g. measuring 44 inches from edge of street tree grates or
newspaper stands toward place of business.)
• Exterior light Fixtures, banners, signs and flags must provide for a minimum clear zone of 7 feet above City
right-of-way.
• Clear Landings of 44 inches or no less than the width of the door (whichever is greater), measured toward the
street, shall be maintained on the exterior side of all required exit doors.
• Rumination from the city fight fixtures shall not be blocked.
• No objects shall be hung from the City fight standards.
• Three feet of clearance around fire hydrants, standpipes, P.I.Ws, manholes, water meters, blowoffs, cleanouts
and valves shall be maintained.
0 None
, OV EVA-In.
PERMIT #: Q00-7 - 0k570
STREET USE PERMIT
Zkc. IS() 0
PROPERTY OWNER NAME: Phone&Z-_S�-) 07-9ZZ9
BUSINESS NAME: )57�-
BUSINESS OWNER NAME: Phond 7_06 !2 3 r-,� - an2s.
ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE: g-y-� s: 'ey
APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS:.&�Z_o 7_�,)29 #Z- 54,
------ I ---------- I -------------------
Placement of any temporary or movable objects in any portion of public space or City right-of-way shall
meet all Code Requirements as set forth in the following chapters of the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
18.70 STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
17.65 LIMITED OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE
17.70.040 TEMPORARY USES; Bistro and outdoor dining
PERMIT ISSUANCE
A Street Use. Pen -nit may be issued, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, City Engineer
or their respective designee, for temporary objects located within any public space, right-of-way, roadway,
parking stnip and/or sidewalk, including the air space above them, if they are placed In compliance with the
above referenced Code Sections and the following cniteria are met, .'
�� It has been concluded that the proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or
pedestrian travel;
Architectural Design Board approval has been granted or the process has been administratively
approved-,
> The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the nights of the public;
I
Items shall be placed adjacent to the building and may encroach onto a maximum of two feet of the
public sidewalk; or in accordance with Bistro and outdoor dining code; or per an approved building
permit;
> Safe pedestrian travel area, or clear zone, of 44 inches minimum width shall -be maintained on City
sidewalks; (see definition of clear zone below)
Exterior light fixtures, banners, signs and flags must be a minimum of 7 feet above City night -of -way;
Clear landings of 44 inches or no less than the width of the door (whichever is greater), measured
toward the street, shall be maintained on the exterior slide of all required exit doors;
Illumination from City light fixtures shall not be blocked;
No objects shall be hung from City light standards; and
SAEngr\Fomis\Street Use Pernnt.doc
Revised 1215105
Three feet of clearance around fire hydrants, standpipes, manholes, water meters, blowoffs, cleanouts
and valves shall be maintained.
Clear Zone Definition: Clear Zone refers to an area 7 feet in height and 44 inches in width providing a
level, safe walking surface along the public sidewalk (e.g. measuring 44 inches from edge of street tree
grates or newspaper stands toward place of business and from the pyound up to a height of 7 feet).
-------------- ----- ----------
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED STREET USE:
0
0
f
0
01 0.
0, 0.
---------- ------------------ ----------------- -------- -------------
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
NOTE: The issuance ofthis permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature, shall vest no
permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the City per
ECDC 18.70.040. By signing this application, the applicant accepts responsibilit)ifor all existing andlor
future street uses. Applicant is responsible toprovide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the
beginning of each calendaryear, no later than the 21s'day of January.
INDEMNITY: The applicant understands and by his/her signature to this application, agrees to hold the
City ofEdmonds harmlessfrom any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever,
foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City ofEdmonds, or any of its
departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including
defense costs, court costs, and allorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. In addition, the applicant
understands that helshe shallprovide and continually maintain during the term of thepermit a certificate
of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, andproviding that it shall
beprimary as to any otherpolicy of insurance.
CODE APPLICATION. By signing the application below the applicant warrants that s/he has read or had
the opportunity to read Chapter 18.70, 17.65, and 17.70.040 of the Edmonds Community Development
Code and sl'he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as ifsetforth in
full and this application andpermits therefore are subject to the terms of those Chapters.
SIGNATURE
ness Owner
DATE /I /
Z,(107
OR CITY USE ONLY
Approved by: �� I Insurance Verified by: Na��
Building Permit A &V &0-7- Street Use Fee: +_ 1 C3 -.� * 100
Issued by:
Receipt No:
Date: Copy to Applicant: 0 Pick-up 0 Mail
SAEngr\Fomis\Stree1 Use Pemiit.doc Revised 12/5/05
'. I"
ACORP. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE wazonrym
1 01/09/2009
PRODUCER (6SI)468-3933 FAX (6Sl)468-3930
Spanjers Insurance Agency
Arthur 3 Gallagher RMS
12SO Northland Drive #120
Mendota Heights, MN SS120
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.-
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC #
INSURED First Source Fitness, LLC
DBA: Snap Fitness
10620 229th Place SW
Edmonds, WA 98020
INSURER& PennStar
INSURER B:
INSURER C:
INSURER D:
INSURER E:
^^%I nA.- e
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
%DD1
tR,r
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER---.
POLICY EFFECTIVE
nATIE (MMIDQ=
POLICY EXPIRATION
—DAMANUM0005--
LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY
PK39275
01/16/2008
01/16/2009
EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 11000100
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
DAMAGE TO RENTED
$ S00,0001
CLAMS MADE M OCCUR
MED EXP (Any one person)
$ S'04
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$ 1,000,
A
N
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$ 2,000,0
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$ 2,000,0
1
F]POLICY M PM F__j LOC
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$
BODILY INJURY
(Per Person)
$
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Per accident)
HIRED AUTOS
NON-OWNEDAUTOS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
S
OTHER THAN EA ACC
$
1
ANY AUTO
S
AUTO ONLY., AGG
EXCESSIUMBRELLA LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
CCCUR CLAIMS MADE
AGGREGATE
$
$
DEDUCTIBLE
$
RETENTION
"IORKERS COMPENSATION AND
TWCYSTA JOTH
ER
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUITTVE
EACH ACCIDENT
$
—E.L. _
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED7
if yes. describe under
SPECIAL PROVISIONS below
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$
OTHER_____
DESC DNS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS
t is understood and agreed that the City of Edmonds is named as an additional insured. Permit for Snap
itness located in City right-of-way.
OS Sth Ave. S Edmonds, WA 98020
rFRTinrATF wni nFR C'ANrF:i I ATInN
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED 13EFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
City of Edmonds
30 DAYS wmTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT.
Engineering Division
BUT FAILURETO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
121 Sth Avenue North
OF ANY VJND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
lGeorge
Edmonds, WA 99020
I
Spanjers/N LE
ACORD 25 (2001108) @ACORD CORPORATION 1988
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
9
p wy C141V
a-Y �7 -.V 2-�
-i�l lll�l 7 7 --mN
1 07 _::7 // /
VN
k. . --O'LA
PLANNING DATA il STREET=FILE I
-- Signs --
Name:
Poke—'
Date:
SiteAddress: 501 Pt J -t� /02. Plan Check It: BLD-20OF—.0 16 91
Project Description:
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES
Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan Designation: D,,/,i,WA Mk Ved
Map Page:
Corner Lot: (6/ NO)
Flag Lot: (YES NO)
ADB File # (or date waived): A114
_ype of
TOTAL Area T
Allowed in
Matrix
Allowed
TOTAL sign
area
Proposed
Type of Sign
zone?
conditions
area per
Unit
allowed for
sign area
met?
unit -..
this sign
Example
wall wlIntemal
Yes, with
Yes
I sq. ff/bnea/
ft. attached
41 ff. attached
Wa//
41 square feet
20 square feet
t1luminatlon
condItIons
wall
Sign # 1
30 ,c
/0, 2
Sign ff 2
Sign #3
TOTAL Stgn Area for Tenan�lSite
Max Permitted:
Previous Total:
Proposed Total:
Sign Height
Sign Type:
Max Permitted: dr 6VIdoi
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted: pt -I
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:".' -
Slqn Lighting
Sign Type: NO
Sign Type:
Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
PLANNING DATA STREET F�ILE
--:.Sign5 --
Sign,Colar5
Proposed: OA,4--
lewfpr��
�.(-o ut<A
Acceptabl e?
Requires ADB Approval? C)
S i ati6n
gn Loc;
If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a fence) meets setbacks?
Setbacks
Street:
Side:
Rear:
Actual S_ot6cks
Street:
Side:
e:
Rear:
La
p5���ain for Signs
Size:
Location:
Critical Areas Determination
Study.R,>equir
Waiver
Other
Plan Review By
it? of eb onb 5W1+
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS Ako
,Ak,�AL
PER International Building Code Section 110
Occupancy established by this certificate: Dwelling Units: N/A No. Stories: I
B
Ty� nstruction: V-A Spri'bk Basement: N/A
Maximum (Per ll�C 1004)
7,00t,�0d
Room -capacity- qiq�s, J':7,r posted at afl times.
Z'
Owner of Building: The Greqorv-'�.---, h
n 5055 AveS#B103
THE
Countrvwide Home Loans,.�-�." HAS BEEN,-1j4
_§F�E�PT AN
, D_!',RqVED AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE 2006 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL �IBUILDING COD5�AVApip�,TjEO. BYTHE�C!TY,*OR THE GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY
AND THE USE FOR WkICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASM'F'!
iW
Issued this 6 �'d March, 2008
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
BY:
This cerdficate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or obscured and shall be maintained in legible condition at all times. Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new
Cerfificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official.
4k
W I I
L
0
PLANNING DATA STREETLILE
-- 5igns
Name, Sonv
Date: I \ /-ZOO
Site Address:
Plan Check #: BLD-200j�- C)
Project Description:
Reduced Site Plan ProvidedfE�/ NO)
Zoning: go—
-z-
Comprehensive Plan Designation: 0own iow-A 6/1'4'er� (a/
Map Page: -2 C) ",� -
I Corner Lot: (YQE9 NO) t
Flag Lot: (YES /&D)
ADB File # (or date waived):
TOTAL Area per T sigo
ype.of
Type of Sign
Allowed in
zone?
Matrix
conditions
met?
Allowed
area per
unit
Unit
TOTAL sign
area
allowed for
this sign
Proposed
sign area
Example
Wall wonternal
t1lumInatlon
Yes w1th
condItions
Yes
I sq. ft.111neal
ft. attWhed
wall
41 It. att3d7ed
wall
41 square feet
20 square feet
oign#
po "wt';Id
C
�0
qo
Sign #2
Sign #3
TOTAL rSlqn Area for Tenan�lSlte
Max Permitted:
Previous Total:
Proposed Total:
5ign Height
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height: <
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Lighting
Sign Type: WGA
Proposed: i
Allowed in zone:
Sign Type:
Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
PLANNING DATA STREETFI��LE
-- Signs
�,Sio C61ors'
Proposed:
aj*-(&r k, AWS
Vj A-" tn C4
Acceptable?
Requires ADB Approval? /1/0
gn Location
If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a
fence) meets setbacks?
Street:
Side:
Side:
Rear:
Actual Setbacks
Street:
ear:
Landscaping for?���� S�6
Size:
Location:
Critical Areas Determination #:
El Study,Required
El waiver
Other
VVj— 0^
A,)r slqt\
0 s-.-e_d �-wo styt co a/LL S-Oy-�
v /;I R� COANC 1�0
CVV �)o I/LUY--
Plan Review By: A - (Z �k�
(Ctftp of (1b
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
#` r r_t"CIU4 0
,-PER International Building Code SectionA110
qns
.;Ih Avll�k aind ilifflelinei Parmit 9- 7nn7.1171
Occupancy established by this certificate:
A3
Dwelling Units: N/A I No. Stories: I
on: VA I Basement: N/A
M (Per IBC 1004)
axinilum Occupant LoW
Rooml.`papa�qi�y signs, A'046'k6d,��ihqst remain poste'd at all times.
J."
4 41., 505
Owner of Building: GPA Inc. t1i 4dol '..-'Ad"'dfe6s/Tehan.t Space: 51h Ave S #104
THE Snap Fitness HAS'4_EE"N`!-.'INSPECTED AND APPROVE D*AS- COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006
EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BU—ILD—ING Cok� ADOPTED� BY'THE" I C - ITY F I OR'THE G - R I OUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE USE
FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED.
th February, 2008
Issued this 27 day of
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
BY: 4��
This certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or obscurer' And l;a5e �aintained in legible conclition at all times. Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new
Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official.
pmm�wwss sees ease eassess eases as as, ow" a
(h (b (T) (h (b (h (h (1) 41N (b
411F
1�
5/16" = 1'-0"
THE COLOK5 SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING AKE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT 15E A TRUE REPKEBENTAMON OF ACrUAL COLORS
8.5"
TYPICAL L.E.D. RACEWAY MOUNT
CHANNEL LETTER SECTION DETAIL
CHAMPHIL LErrO
TIww
LLD. Um"
Wum CONXECT"WR
7'x?'R=KMV
I FpAorroToollum
T- I MOUN'tING MWAW
I
ACRYUC FAW —
PEXEITIATIONS IIZALW
CONNECTOR
VnM SIUCONE
—POWERSUPIPLY
aptomLT —
LMVQVA09WW9
.NO ALUMINUM P-TVRN
4XIALUMINUMBACK
A. CHANNELLOGO f6Z=#7326 FLEX WHITE
IRM = 13LACK. RETURNS = WHITE, LM = WHITE
5M TRANSLUCENT V'INYL OYERLAY
SLATE GREY #3630-61
CARDINAL FED #3650-53
15, CHANNEL LETTE fj&Q=#2283 REP, IM=DLACK
RETURNS = WHITE, La= RED 05
C. CHANNEL LETTE f&Q=#7328 REP, ZW=13LACK
RETURNS = RED, JM= WHITE D5
D. CHANNEL LEIM E6CE=#2253 RED, IKIM=13LACK
FETLIKNS = WHITE, LM= FED 05
E. RACEWAY FAINTED TO MATCH 15IJILDING
FRONT ELEVATION - 5TH AVE 5
S-4m 40^4 = qo-F�-
0
r1m
AP�l I
PIANNING
k
CUSTOMER
DRAWN BY
WITH APPROVAL OF THI5 DRAWING I HERE13Y GIVE SCHAD TRACY SIGNS PERMISSION
THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF
5NAr FITNE55
DARREN
TO 5EGIN PROOLICTION OF THE SIGNAGE ILLUSTRATED IN TH15 00CLIMENT. I AGREE
325 MINNESOTA AVE. N.
1610 E. CUFF RD.
CITY
STATE
SALES REP.
AT ALL THE SPECIFICATIONS, SPELLING, COLORS AND ELEVATION5 LISTED INTI-115 DRAWING
ARE COR ECT AND APPROVED. ANY CHANGES TO TH15 DRAWING AFTER PROPUCTION
PO. BOX 357
ORONOCO, MN 5W60
BURNSVILLE, MN 57M
EDMON05
WA
KORY C.
HAS STARTED WILL RESULT IN AODITIONAL CHARGES.
PHONE / 507-367 -2631
PHONE 952-894,2421
FAX 952,894,2748
FILE NAME
KC4176-10-3
FSCALE
CUSTOMER APPROVAL DATE
FAX / 507-367-2633
Tk so Q-1fty
I ORic. DATE 10/31/07 REV. DATE 00/00/00 7 1 REVISION 0 11 FONTS USED: IMPORTED IMAGE -mm- r—mg-ft a Ill ffm I
NOV 19 2007
c P I I* -
41
� A
AS N
Date:
STREET FILE
*01 4 t, 0061. -
OV 19 2007
:M CENT
RE 'D
CEIVF
9 20
"'I'Ll"ll ov SDM04DS
ov
L-lcccm-� 6'. 1�x 14"t.
1) Any request for alternate design, modification,
variance or other administrative deviation
(hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes,
ordinances or policies must be specifically
requested in. writing and be called but and
identified. Processing fees for such request shall be
established by Council and shall be paid upon
submittal and are, non-refundable.
2) Approval of any plat or plan containing
provisions which do not comply with city code and
for which a variance has not been specifically
identified, requested and considered by the
appropriate city official in accordance with the
appropriate provision of city code or state law does
not approve any items not to code specification.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
WORK
ADDRESE
OWNIER
APPROVED:1�
BLDG CIFFICIA:
RESUB
NOV 19 2007
I U
JA_ 0-
STREET FILE
RECEIVED
NOV 0 9 2007
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
VI
DOLCE&MLLC
77
LEASED
tR M511".1
oo LL,
C=
Cm
C.�j 13C
> �C
C,
C" Q.5)
Uj
C14 Ca U_
M 'no
UJ LLJ
U:
Li- _j
SO
cc Go
Dolce La Belle Signaqe Mocku p- = pC:) Ell
1/27/08
Non -Illuminated outside store -front signage for retail. -
Dimensions are. 123" x 12". Total sign area 10 sq ft. Wall
mounted flush with curvature of surface. 1/8"' steel,
rusted with cut-out letters backed with 1/8" white plexi.
Mounted with hex head lag bolts directly into wood
surface.
\i�
7"Mmk*
Ir
CITY OF EMIONMOS
BUILDING DEPART MENT
OWNER
APPROVED DA��7
BLDG OFFICV
NUMBER
132006 FAhion IRC w1WAC Amm6neaft
W17006 E-Ation T1ACv;AVAC AniW&W-US
�f An=vkmu- s,
006 Fj��i4n t,,prA4141,
and Appendices, �4
_
.
C32006 r Am=&="
02006 Elj(�-
02006 E&bon,�FC -,NF1�MC AnvmdnrAb
L32006 U1-601! V1 thQ IXAC 5 1- 13
1) Any request for alternate design, modification,
M006Effifibb WSECWAC31-11
variance or other administrative deviation
(hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes,
ordinances or policies must be specifically
-requested in writing and be called out and
identified. Processing fees for such request shall be
established by Council and shall be paid upon
submittal and are non-refundable.
2) Approval of any plat. or plan containing
provisions which do not comply with city code and
for which a variance has not been specifically
ST REET FILE
identified, requested and considered by the
appropriate city official in accordance with the
appropriate provision of city code or state law does
not approve any items not to code specification.
_�RECEIVED
FEB 2 9 2008
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF E0.k!0f-.1_r,1S
N00*40158'A qIR00'
26 23
25 24
5th. AVE. 5.
APPROVED BY PLANNINC,
v
THE -GREGORY
ARCHrrECTURAL SFTE PLAN
00-22-4-7- N 10q.80-
-ol- to) Corner Flag
Zone t, R
LI Setback Required Actual
Front 0 0
Sides 0 /0
U ------------------------- Rear jcj' 15.5
SITE PLAN Other 45, 45-
Height 30' PERMrr SET 30 1
Qrr PROM
OTM c A1.10
P P R NA I T C. 0, 1 J 9J T,'z: fr'!
BU I LD I N& HE I &HTS
\T=R-.TIOAJ- VATUM
NAVV 88. PUBL15HED ELEVATION OF 614.54 FEET FOR
SNOHOMISH COUNTY BENCHMARK #12'15 DE50RIBED
AS A BRASS DISK SET VERTICALLY IN THE ViE5T
CONCRETE YiALL OF THE EDMONDS MUSEUM, MARKED
U565 V241-7 I-q4-7, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
5TH. AVE. BETINEEN MAIN STREET AND BELL STREET.
USED A BENCHMARK SET 5'r ONSOIN(5 CONSTRUCTION
AT N.E. CORNER OF STH. AVE. S. AND KALNUT ST.
BENaH MARK - RAILROAD SPIKE IN A UTILITY POLE
APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET EAST AND 21 FEET NORTH
OF INT AT STH. AVE. S. / ViALNUT ST.
ELEV. = 84.15
AVERASE DATUM
65.52'
GARA&E FLOOR:
67.45'
FIRST FLOOR (TOP OF SUBFLOOR):
"71.61,
SECOND FLOOR (TOP OF SUBFLOOR):
qO.q4'
THIRD FLOOR (TOP OF SUBFLOOR):
101.2,71
THIRD FLOOR TOP OF PLATE:
110.12'7'
TOP OF MODULATED ROOF:
115.52,
MAX. ALLOYI. HT. (DATUM + 50.09 115521
AVERA&E DATUM
PROPERTY CORNER A:
aO.cl-T'
PROPERTY CORNER B:
*7"Thl'
DATUM CORNER C:
85.52'
DATUM CORNER D:
aq.qcl,
TOTAL - 554.001'
AVEIRAv&E DATUM:
(554.0-q'/ 4)
MAX. ALLON. HT.:
(DATUM + 50.09
R E IC, ag: -'1 ",j
PEBMIT
u
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects
5o5 /k,, S.
SITE ADDRESS: ZONING: &2
-/L2�V ALLOWED?: X,�f
A USE(S) PROPOSED: 140,e-A V.%,. ".1o1X,, Qle,6�,
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (YN
CUP File: To Allow What Uses?:
ADBFILE#: 03-44-
PARKING: B-0-4 A --
Use: No. Spaces Required: 1
X 4k
.(floor area,# employees, etc.)= 2-al
Use: oj-�A-tt /(rtn:j . No. Spaces Required: i �,-4e /56of 6,P4
R, I &f + 4 X 13 -5 ge 0 (floor area, # employees, etc.) 2.1,. g
No. Spaces Required: 0
X (floor area, # employees, etc.) =
Use: No. Spaces,.Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.) =
Total Required: 54 .3 15S Actual Provided: 60
SETBACKS:
'Required Setbacks:
0 Left Side: 0 --- Right Side: o Rear: 5", (4,5-'.0P4% SPA'a
Actual Setbacks: (bae_.Yj - s4< jk—
Front: 0 Left Side: — I Right Side: O� 'Rear: 15,15' LiAb.
0
'Street map checked for additional setback required? Me IN
All— IWV*k
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: 4U_V,1,
Maximum Allowed: 3 Actual: 3.9 393- Z_ - 77
BUILDING HE16HT:
�Maximum Allowed: 5- -- 3 a.' 01 Actual Height: 3�
!-Modulation Allowed?:, Yes Modulation Height: 30- (113. r, v
-."�Datum Point: F_�k Datum Elevation: �'4.ij (op 6&'&A
-7,.4; �G,4
1��, I : _ ;AElevator Penthouse > 3 feet over heigh)�timit? w. If so,VAR#
z z I' "— 5- L ijm—h-
0 W�K 64,4,.A N,41 8 - 4,, t Z(;. P�
LANDSCAPING:
Matches ADB approved:
0 Bid Provided? ;j-, in",,A Bond Amount (100% bid):
CRITICAL AREAS #: 505� 14 5-15
SEPA DETERMINATION:. (VIDAtf - 4)aawA 1149/03 M,h*jc,��, PM
SHORELINE REQUIRED?: M.-
Continued ...
1Ahbrary\AP1andatNewConun.doc
0
Oro VIC
(,A te
OF
30 "�o
DATE: PLAN CHK#: 04 - 4 So
NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT:, .5t-At,,e.D6,. L-1-�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C.,%,
Z 13 'Zkk' nA�IVA-- 1 (00 C-Alle
24 "-q 7 tt rt417L
ADB FILE #: 0 3 -,�4 OR DATE WAIVED:
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN:
Aj ADB oyp" rA-16ej
SUBDIVISION: tDt7
V
LOT AGGREGATION REOUIRED?: �j - f- L - 2-vo4- g'q
REDUCED SITE PLAN, (8.5X1 1) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? Yk -
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
se� k-3 6-
A, 6, (1, 5- -11,5' K"J" 0 6 /ol,
PIAD V-1.4�- Ar aof-1 .
Ar
(Aj 2, ) (2- 1 k., � Z)
Hy- o,
V 6—:k3 ?p, o,4 e-V
'�'4 , "0-4— + A"
0 AL" P'o- 1 "v� L P,#-j 6e, piz,
�p<
o Wirtrj& O'k �.-k
1Ahbrary\AP1andatNcwComm.doc
00
4.
0
1�
z
co
io
01 AKIKI111KH'I nATA
A 2 .00
,2,10 New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects
'2,-2-e I K Cj
`2
0 1'�E A+b 6`R'E'3S0S: AV "I ZONING:
zUSE(S) PROPOSED: - kKl-h--/�Lm I _444LE ED?- &je_<,
GAL NONCONFORMING LAN6 USE Ell MINATI(TN ISSUED— /\_It"(Y/N)
�CUP File: To Allow What Uses?:
,,ADB FILE #: &"'*3 - e-
PARKING:
Use: No. Spaces Required:
. X1 /41'14 in (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: re4�i; I I No. Spaces Required: - :
. X '6 '0 (floor area, # employees,'etc.)
Use: P-e-sic4, e-0_)n;5;t4P3 — . No. Spaces Required:. w- ,-yjj
X (floor area, # employees, etc.) 41, q
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc
Total Required: i -7 (j, Actual Provided: -7:2-
eesacl.
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front:.� Left Side: -6PL Right Side: -tg— Rear: q5 e,4
Actual Setbacks: .4, 1 19—D*-
Front: ;-&- Left Side: �� Right Side: Rear:
Street map checked for additional setback required? A/01- Pagh.'_(�js)k
MUM FLOOR AREA:
Maximum Allowed: Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT: I
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:
Modulation Allowed?: !1> Modulation Height: 12-!5.�t- t;
DatuT_Dj��&-&-r.r z rr- **A we-r-j- Datum Elevation:
Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? if s-o,VAR#
6 o*n creAe_ wo,11 of 4�e_ "k,. M&ts eotj ah v-44- be4w*, Ala-1, j3,ej
LANDSCAPING: L-SO-5 VZ9'1 )9q-7
.Matches ADB approved:
Bid Provided? Bond Amount (100% bid):
/ V41 Vepe,
LRdITICAL AREAS #: 02--IOLI VMVC4`207-101 /13-13
SEPA DETERMINATION: "
SHORELINE REQUIRED?:
Continued ...
kA I -fi 6 S
> ?*�
-I tbr.ry\^P1and9WewComm.doc Pr?-
err
#146 C
6�0 kn V\/t vrk�-K S T:�� L�j IS -7 -7 L( -TWO --j
b 0
f,
DATE:— _71'7'5_1Wo _15 -,PLAN CHK#-.
NAME OF BU ILDING PERMIT APPLICANT:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ADB FILEM OR DATE WAIVED:
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN:
SUBDIVISION:
LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?:
REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X1 1) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE?
t
OTHER:
W
Plan Review By:
V&P &$4s
o, rn R
T;) -7
1 031 514�
e.\
o(eck-s, rA47o. space, VJ1 Obvin—T4
.7�p— jo� I aW
== CB S.
_4-2�5—
ky, ot-x :-- It -5,
1A1ibrary\^P1andatNewComm.doc
A -
z
0
0
W
z
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / Mulffamily Projects
SITE ADDRESS: 5- ZONING: U, t- P02-(OPI
USE(S) PROPOSED: Non, 4Lit, - mi . soo, Mr- - Ow'i z- 6e,,�,,ALLOWED?: Ycs -'�& '.*41 ,,
LEGAL NONCONFORMINGr LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N)
CUP File: To Allow What Uses?:
ADB FILE #: ;,w 3 - 4 A -
PARKING: V;_.V�
Use:
No. Spaces Required:
. X
(floor area, # employees, etc.) =
Use:
No. Spaces Required:
X
(floor area, # employees, etc.) =
Use:
No. Spaces Required:
X
(floor area, # employees, etc�) =
Use:
No. Spaces Required:
. X
(floor area, # employees,.etc.) =
Total Required:
Actual Provided:
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
-5— - Front: 0 Left Side: 0 Right Side: 0 Rear-) S' (4
Actual Setbacks:
Front: 0 Left Side: Re (5'/4v
_=- 'Aight Side: ar:
Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/Noj
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Mo�� qrtv�b.,j re,,-e� 0-vA. /- 3
Maximum Allowed: Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:
Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height:
Datum Point: Datum Elevation:
Elevato r Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? If so,VAR#
'04%6
LANDSCAPING: 14&t', CS',i
Matches ADd a'pproved: 4. 4&_
Bid Provided?4h,92-t.jT Bond Amount (100% bid):
CRITICAL AREAS #: 0 2, -toS' 93 -134 L't�S7- 6' 0 2 - io4
C�
M L4 ./'2-Z
SEPA DETERMINATION: ON" A/."3 A 3 *
(,�m #fAQA S400ce i -'�2_ ip,,� PA,-vrj ,,c 30 aco e-. Azuji
SHORELINE REQUIRED?' 4t- 9 P ft
Continued ...
'Z3 1
1Afibrary\^P1andatNewConim.doc
LOG ITEM #_
'i
DATE: JO 7/ 1 IdA --PLAN CHK#. Z-o3
NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: 61ft, qw. De,. LLC,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ADBFILE#: 03-44- OR DATE WAIVED:
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: *. - -) a,,., o,.,, ;�, ZA
SUBDIVISION:
LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: AW4 R]Lz.,
4EDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X1 1) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE?
OTHER: (z-o2-ioi- rt-A,.t�, 4-5' oo" scaj, zv,, rV 'Jw � %+,w�
0, 6.11,4A *A tQ(, , /�- A./ t", I �*AA I.
Plan Review By:
1Afibrary\AP1andatNewComm.doc
505 FIFTH "ENUE BUILDING
505 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
BUILDING OWNER
FIFTH AVENUE DEVELOPMENT LLC
-21 e FlFf! 1 AVENUE Set:ffH StIl I E 20 AVS
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
425.673.4218
ARCH ECT
TAYLOR GREGORY BUTTERFIELD ARCHITECTS
2:1 - ---- ;tJ I N, SUITE-203-
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, 98020
- -75 0-565
425. 7. - - - 54�-
PROJEtT DESCRIPTION
A THREE STORY MIXED USE CONDOMINIUM/OFFICE BUILDING WITH A
72-STALL SECURE SUBTERRANEAN PARKING GARAGE WITH STREET
ACCESS OFF WALNUT. THE OFFICE PORTION OF THE BUILDING,
APPROXIMATELY 21,108 S.F. IS LOCATED AT STREET LEVEL (FIRST
FLOOR) WITH ACCESS OFF OF FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH. THE SECOND
AND THIRD FLOORS WILL HAVE A COMBINED TOTAL OF 22
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS.
,MARCH, 2003
r-'qr
^wrR t FILE
bi E
S.E.P.A.
Note: The following continues after the cover page, which makes
reference to the Project name, Applicant and the Contact person.
4. Date checklist prepared.
Februaiy 27,2W3
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City ofE&n&i*
(STAFF COMMENTS) ---
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if appUcable):
Applyfor demo permit appraxhnat4 Aprd 2003.
ApPlYfor grading1shoring permit approximately May 2003-
,4pplyfor buildingpermit approximately Aprd 2003
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or fiather activity related to or connected with
this proposal? If yes, explain.
NONE
(STAFF
8. List any enviroarnental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposW.
Critical area checklut determinations have been granted on all three parce&
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approval of other proposWs directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain.
NONE
0 0
(STAFF CO
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
BuiLft Demolition and Grading Permit
ADB approval
11. Give 1xiet complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project
and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of
your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
A three-story building with 22 condominium unit spaces consisting of approximately
35, 000 squarefeet of living space above the groundfloor, which Consists of approximately
20, 000 squarefeet of officelretail spacA above a subterranean parbng garage which is
cpproximately 2 7, 5 00 squarefeet.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of
your proposed project, including a street addrm, if any, and section, township, and range, if
known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range of boundaries of the site(s),
Provide legal descrip0on, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. WWile
you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required t6 duplicate maps of detailed
plans submitted with any. permit applications related to this checklist.
505 JAve. South, E&nondr, WA. 98020
Situated in the county of Snohomish, State of Washington
Legal Description:
Lots 1, 2,3 and 4, Block 124, City of Edmonds, according to the Plat thereojr recorded in volume 2
of plais, page 39, Records qfShohomish Couno� Washington
7hatPortion ofsection 25, Township 27Norzk Range 3 East, WM, in Snohomish Counj%
Washingto); being described asfollowv:
,Beginning at the Northwest quarter corner OfSaid Sechon,
Thence East 220fee4
Thence South 99feet,
7hence West 220feet,
Thence North 99feet to the point q
.f beginning,
Eiccept the East 73jeet thereof,
Aho except the West 30feetfor Road
Together w h the East 61fe of the W t 2 Feet ofthe North 99f of t N
08 eet he W.112N
it et . W 112,
es
Ser. 2S, T-27-N, R-3-F, WK, Snohomish County, Washmgton
(STAFF COMMENTS)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Ew*
a. General description of the site (circle one): F14 rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous,
other.
Slopes downwardfirom the east property lines, west to 5* A venue Soudi
70-A-7 pn
(STAFF COMMENTS)
,
Ito -:f5&E:E aLe-vogs Z-=::ffi e- la:L-
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Elevation chang�efrom 90.97'to 80.97 10'-0"' over a distance of208.0, This
results in a slope of 4.85vo.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat muck)?
if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
No agricultural soils werefound on the subjectproperly. Developer willprovidegeo-
technical report with this submittal
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Are them surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.
NO, see geo-technical report.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or graftg proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
,4ppraxim atelv 2 7,013.8 cubic yards offUling will be required to be removed so as to
a4YWt surface elevations to accommodate the &ainage andparking improvements.
Consistent with Community Development Code City ofEdmonds Environmental
Section.- soils and topography, graft andfUling on the site will proceed In accordance
with thefollowingpolicies:
will noi"ardiw the stability of anyslope or of apsy adjoining pvpen),
Lemeom erosion control measums wdi be wuiertakm so rehoe erosion during cm.*.Wom
Could erosion occur as a result of clewing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Na Temporwyerosion control methods shall be undenaken with site shoring at all
property lines.
2. AIR
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 29,492 square feet or 88016 of site is impervious sur
.fare.
(STAFF COMMEN
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Drainage protechon Ly proposed around the building and development areas, with the
use offoundation and roof drain systems that empty into a tight lined storm system. 7he
storm system will be tied to the existing system that lies beneath FifihAvenue Sou&
Erosion Protection of the exposed soils areas will be achieved through containment of
potential runoffon the site or on the adjacentproperty. All erosion oontrolmeasjirej
imposed by the City ofEdmonds Engineering Department will befollowed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
What 4W Of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust automobile, odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? if any,
generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Possible dust during cons1ructiork no emissions afierproject u completed other than
automobile
(STAFF C
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so
generally desaibe.
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the project, if any.
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe VAX
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
There are no sur
fiace bodiej of water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site,
other than Shellabarger Creek which is, separated the proposed building site by
a long established street, curb, gutter, sidewalks and storm systems and three
(3) story mired use building which, was permitted and constructed under
current zoning.
(STAFF COMMENTS). - -
(2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
See above.
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from swface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
&-scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
NO.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a I 00-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
Based on the Februaiy 19, 1986, nood Insurance Rate Map; no portion of the
project lies within the 100 yr. floodplain.
(STAFF COMMENTS)—
(6) Does the proposal involve and discharges of waste materials to surface waters? if SO,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
0 0
b. Ground:
(1) Will i ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general descriptiM purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
NO
(STAFF COM3ENTS)
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
Other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; fndu�strial, containing the followwo
chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicablel or the number of animals of
human the system(s) are expected to serve.
NONE
(STAFF COMMEM),
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
.0) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this
water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
The principal source of runoff will be rainwater andsnow melffirom roof,
parAing, and landscape impervious surfaces. Storm water runoffwill be
collected in a system q
.f catch basins and undergroundpipes, and conducted to a
de4ention system, which will discharge into the existing alley catch basin, which
eventually discharges into Puget Sound
(STAFF C
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters?, If so, generally describe.
7)p1cal components ofstorm waterfirom impervious surfaces such as roads and
par*ing areas are petrochemicals, automotive waste products. In the completed
project storm water runoffftom iVervious sur
fiaces on the site will be collected
in the catch basin collection system and treated will oillwater separation be ore
.f
being routed to the adjoining storm sewer system for eventual discharge into
PugetSound Sanilwy sewer service will beprovided by the City of E&nonds.
(STAFF CO
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any.
During cowlructlot& temporary measures will be employed to control runoff and water
quality, including appropriate best managementpractices. In the completedproject.
oillwater separation and detention will control impacts of rurwfffroin impervious
surfaces, including those subject to vehicle wes.
0 0
(STAFF COMMENTS)-
4.PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
-__2L—deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
_X evergreen tree: fir, cedar� pine, other
X
X
------jcrop or gram
...... �wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
----water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other-
--2L—other types of vegetati
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be 'removed or altered?
ne existing vegetation shall be replaced with new landscaping which will meet the
E&nonds Community Development Code Landscape requirements See enclosed
landscapingplans,
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation
on the site, if any.
The existing vegetation shall be replaced with new landscaping which will meet the
E&nonds Community Development Code Landscape requirements. See enclosed
landrcapingplans.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
S. ANIMALS
a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site: NONE
___.Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other.
_.MammW&- deer, bear ck beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring shellfish, other
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any thmatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
(STAFF
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
NO
(STAFF CO
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs?. Describe whether it will be used for beating,
manufiwWring, etc.
Electricfor lighting natural gasfor coolang and heating.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project aff-ect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
if so, generally describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List
other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts� if any.
I Y7ris project will meet all ofthe requirements of the state and Jowl enerV codes.
(STAFF CO
0 .0
7. ENVIRONMENTAL BEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of
fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a remit of this proposal?
If so describe.
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Desaibe special emergency services that might be required.
NONE
(STAFF CO
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if an3r
NONE
(STAFF CO
b. Noise
(1) Whafiypes of noise exist in the area which way affect your project (for example-.
Traffic, quipment operation, other)?
Normal routine tra
.ffic on Walnut Street, Holly drive and Ffflh Ave South.
(STAFF COMWMNTS)- -
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project
On a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation,
other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short-term: 7)pical construction noises during construction hours.
(7.-00am - 4.30pm)
Long-term: NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)-
(3) Proposed measures to' reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
NONE
(STAFF
41
10
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
& What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties.
Located on the three parcels are a restauraM a current constructionjob site office
garage and a singlefamay residence. A4#acentproperties are Singlefamily Residence to
the East. To the South ofthe site, across Holly Drive, is a small commeeciallretail
building with two resgkmalfloors above. To the West ofthe site is a chy sloe 4 Fiflh
Avenue SoutA separating ifftoin the other adjacent properties.
(STAFFCO
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
NO.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. Describe any structures on the site,
A 2- 395 squareJo0t restaurant, 0 currentiob site office (construction) and a mall
single family residencei.
d. Will any structures be demolished? if so, whav
All three building sir;taures will be demolished to make wayfor the new proposed
structure.
(STAFF COfvfl%IENTS)
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
BC Community Business
(STAFF COMMENTS)_
E What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
BC. Community Business
(STAFF COMMFWTI.9
Vi Ce�,, 4e-e-
)all
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
NIA
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive area? If so, specify.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)_
Approximately how many people would reside or work mi the completed project9
Undetermined Theproject will consist qf22 residential condominiums and commerciall
o
ffice space of +/- 20, 000 squarefeet.
(STAFF COMAENTS)
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
NONE
(STAFF
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Increase housing availability.
-(STAFF CO
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses
and plans, if any:
This project is compatible with existing andprojected land uses andplans per the
E. C. D. C and the city ofE&nonds comprehensive plan
(STAFF
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing.
22 middle to high income condominiums.
(STAFF COMNENTS)
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether higk middle,
or low-income housing.
I middle income house,
0
12
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structu*s), not including antennas; What is the
principle exterior building materiaks) proposed?
30 Feet above the propertiesfour corners average which is lower than the 2ifoot height
to which a singlefamily residence could have been built on the property prior to the
contract rezone to which this property is subject. The building uses afloalroofaspart of
a modidated building design with a combination o
fvertical and horizontal siding, wood
Or composite shingles, and brick or brick veneer. See the enclosed elevationsfor
clarifications.
(STAFF COAINffibM)_-
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be aftered or obstructed?
There are no view easements or view rights ofrecord and no indication that any
potential affectedparty has taken any of the available and required steps to.obtain any
view rights through theproposedprojectpropeny There will besigm
.ficant obsiruction
ofviews in the immediate vicinily to the easl
(STAFF COMMENTS).
c. Prqposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impuU, if any:
Approval ofawhetics by the EdmondsArchitectural Design Board required to continue
this project.
(STAFF
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
NONE
(STAFF COMMEN
13
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfm with views?
NO.
(STAFF C
c. What existing off -site �ources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None
(STAFF CO
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
NIA
(STAFF C
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
City parks, Puget Sound beaches, city recreation center, and a private athletic dub.
(STAFF COMAMNTS)-
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
NONE.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the projed or applicant if aw.
NONF.
(STAFF COMMENTS)-
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
14
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation
re&ters known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
NONE.
(STAFF C
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
NONE,
(STAFF CONBMM)_
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any -
NONE.
(STAFF C
14. TRANSPORTA71ON
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Public streets at the project are Walnut, Holly Drive and.54 Ave S The subterranean
parking garage will have direct access to the street systems by way of Walnut,, which
accesses Fifth Avenue Soutk
(STAFF COMMEN
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
Yes, the nearest public transit stop is located 6 Fi h Avenue, 150feet away, directly
on ft
infiront qjrPetosa's Family grocer
(STAFF C
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
SeventY-two (72) parking stalls would beprovided Approximately Twenty (20) stalls
would be replaced
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
NONE With the excepdon ofgeneral site improvements that the city of Edmonds
requests with the buildingpermit.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or ak transportation?
If so, generally describe.
7he Edmondsfeny and train depot are located seven blocks Northwest of the project sitA
along with the public transit system. This willprovide a sufficient variety ofpublic
transportation to accommodate tenants.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f How many vehicular bips per day would be generated by the completed project? lfknown,
indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Approximately 25, 000 squarefeet (gross) with requiredparking per ECDC of sevenl�,
two (72) standardparking stalk, including Four (4) hand1capped accessible, which are
included in the project We project approximately a net of nine (9) pin peak hour trips
with the peak times thiring normal business hours of 7:00 am. to 9:00 am. and to 4:00
p. in. to 6: Oo p. m.
(STAFF C
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if W.
Theprimmy incentive to control tros is based on the building design and location YU
building location is easily accessible by all availableforms otpublic transportation.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
IS. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in as increased need for public services ( for example: fire
protectionj police protection, health me, schools, other) ? If so, generally describe.
Normalfire andpolice protection shall be required
0. 0
16
(STAFF COMMENTS1
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
ne project will meet or exceed all currentfire code requirementsfor new buildings.
(STAFF COMMENTS)-
0 0.
17
16. LTTRXr]ES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other
(STAFF COMMENTS
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and
the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which
might be needed.
Vedrical- Snohomish County PUD
Telephone Verizon Telephone Co
Natural Gas: #F �a h ingtmrftrw=J-G� Go. "-,I
Sewer System: City ofEdmonds Sewer System
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C- SIGNATURE
The above answers. are true to the be I st of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on
them to make its decision.
Signature of Proponent
Date Submitted
Z-llmlloaa3
110 Z
L2, L�
i0o .123 C/3 62 6"
I LLJ 115 592 18 24 538 U2 55 0 0)
604 610
107 650
110
145 X
152, 11.5
22� 120 , I I I I I J
to (0
410 5408
2W 203 620 640 646 032 6W,
_210
221
201
222 22� CHURCH
M 52 551 .9 81 A99 629 645
.LU
2�9 229 232 229
23� 239 366308 303 610 616 626 632 642 644 6U: 656 w 704
200 >
2RM. -.542
i2O 247 310, 321
230 251 601
317 611 AM Ism 84 04�
PUD 410 . I . .
SSIU-8 U I 1 5
410 604 7MO2
338 271
437 407
346 319 424
419
425
403 318 320 524
40 504 530 530 546 WOS
T41, 409 407 - a 634 640648 660 W3 7
412 4io 408 404
515
417 514
.76 507 518 519
SOUNDVIEW 469 .60 520
Wa 520 520
514 .142 5w
407 540 524 701
---Subject Propeft 10
I sw 528 523 525
FAMILY
FOODS 538 531 527 529 012 702 7
505 5th Ave TIC 518 520 540 548
1AfV 548 —
308 31 0 511 610 537 539 (J) 601 606 W8 812 618 622
507 510 G. D. 703
511 531 564 Lj 703 700
61 623 —
5,5 517 706 701
W1 WO 51 1 6 — <� 707 702
516 524 530 538 720 723 — 7
527 530 726 727 629 710 709
531 5u 533 60 613 427 535 714 : 712 1
539 5" 539 615
EDEL- 643 716
541 554 541 WEISS 621
543 547 6u 61 520 2 642 808 807
654 555
E812 810
906 515 &5 141) [U]4 550 .14 a3i 6" 713
ONDS 76 702 703 ... 554 902 904 901
705
S .709 710 9w 7 1 05 1,,� 520 531 556 908 900 902 04 90 .
PT. SHOP 711 909
715 716 525 558 908
721 717 ws 529 919 917
305 727 RA4 515 .527 561 611 921 635 641 645 7
920
410
C4 i0lo
Zoning and Vicinity Map
Attachment I
File No. ADB-2003-"
f
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
Proposed.Holly Park Building
SE Corner Walnut Street & 5th Avenue South
Edmonds, Washington
Project No. 2003-007
Prepared By:
The Riley Group, Inc.
10728 Lake City Way NE
Seattle, WA 98125
Prepared for:
Fifth Avenue Development, LLC
437 - 5th Avenue South
Edmonds, Washington 98020
February 7, 2003 C, f-El 8F V7= r"
APR 1, 5 2003
A M 1 T CO U W E R
-STREET FILE
____V
'APR- 1 1,-,�003, FRI 1.1 :41
'�84/1-14#2003 12:07
AM GG ENGINEEKING
2e6417e552
MX. NU. 4�b (18 bbJb --- r.-.0 I
THE RILEY -1 GOO
.�".Sovkw
Geotectinkal &V1f6nmQn1W
10728 Lake City WOY N61`11hOW
seattIO ' Washington 08125
Phone. (206) 417-0551
Fax: (206) 417-055-2
1301 Mck
Tot joe Galusha.,, CG. [cn%-,:.
I (including cover)
425478-5536
April 2003
425-778-85.00 ...Mar
0
Pro' 2003.; 1r,10 m V. U via&" Reply a pion" Rooyol*
13 Urgent E3 Feii. ow
commental
Joe..
rovided by CG Bosincering for
lit acwr(Lwcr, mith your mqul*4 Vv6JAYC*viVw0` "the. �i N T p
m jX*1F,,V USE CON
i0i - Mi AVE, SOCTM'
F-,i)MONDS�WA".
111c jbilow itig 4shects Were PT0Vid,';
.#to Ilk:
3�- SH".
g1j.1 daW4/10/0 0 NOTA.
LE:
S141.2 datcd4/10/03...
Slll,,3 daW4/l0`/0i..t'&
SWA datod4/l0/0j.!'SA6fUN0
., th ons summarized in our
-111C gcotwhiii�l aspwu of thi,pullit �=.Kcmb..
.'jwt No. 2003-007).
f
'or ft
3
gt!otwiniull
We r
,1jeckc(t soWicr pile cxnboono4owd�l
E 14 - tT,.1 6
N I 5-N22
T-47-N 14
.S17-829
emoomod depths provide suitable factors of saft' tY
Bmwti on our ovattlation. it is 6�t OpWowt,hat ft�04#010
j1ppiltst twertoming. mid tkr
if you haveany questions or con,1110ts, Or
We trilst thiq odeqmatcly summariz"r eovie*-. onwv"
HARD COPY: 111
Vyi-11-Apr-2(013:19 VW11'
J i
February 7, 2003
Mr. Bob Gregg
Fifth Avenue Development, LLC
437 - 5th Avenue South
Edmonds, WA - 98020
Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
SE Corner Walnut Street and 5th Avenue South
Edmonds, Washington
Project No. 2003-007
Dear Mr. Gregg:
As requested, The Riley Group, Inc. (Riley) has completed a geotechnical engineering
study for the above referenced project. This report summarizes our findings and
recommendations for the geotechnical aspects anticipated for the project design and
construction.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Our understanding of the project is based on information provided to us in January and
February 2003, by the client, the architect (Butterfield Design Group), and the structural
engineer (CG Engineering). (This is the same design team as that for the "5th and
Walnut" project, which is nearing completion, located to the north, across Walnut
Street, from the current project.) The Holly Park site is located at the southeast comer
of Walnut Street and 5th Avenue South in Edmonds, Washington, as shown on the Site
Vicinity Map, Figure 1. We understand the proposed project consists of removing 3
existing buildings and constructing a mixed -use condominium/office building with I
level of underground parking and 2 to 3 levels above grade. Finished floor elevation for
the underground parking will be at about Elevation 65 feet [NAVD 88 Datum], which
Geotcchnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 2 of 17
will require cuts to 15 to 25 feet below existing grade. The structural engineer intends
to use shoring consisting of cantilevered soldier piles in combination with temporary cut
slopes for the excavation. This approach was successfully used for the 5th and Walnut
project. Maximum footi ng loads are estimated to be 4.5 kips per linear foot for
continuous wall footings and 230 kips for isolated column footings.
The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based on our
understanding of the above design features. If actual features vary or changes are made,
we should review them in order to modify our recommendations as required. In
addition, we recommend that we be retained to review the final design drawings and
specifications to verify that our project understanding is correct, and that our
recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design
and construction.
SURFACE CONDITIONS
Existing conditions are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan in Figure 2. The site is
about 200'feet north -south by' 120 to 180 feet east-w.est. At the time of our field
explorations, there were 3 buildings on the site - an active restaurant in the northeast
comer, an abandoned auto repair shop in the south center part of the site, and an
occupied single family residence in the southwest comer of the site. Most of t he rest of
the site was paved with asphalt; however, surface conditions in the southeast part of the
site were grass, dirt, and light gravel. The site generally sloped down from southeast
(Elevation 90 feet) to northwest (Elevation 77 feet).
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Field Explorations
On January 17, 2003, 3 borings (B-1 through B-3) were drilled to depths of about 34 to
39 feet below the existing ground surface by a subcontractor using a truck -mounted
Mobile B-61 drill rig. The borings were advanced with hollow stem auger, and samples
THE FJLEY GROUP9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report February 7, 2003
Proposed Holly Park Building Project No. 2003-007
Edmonds, Washington Page 3 of 17
were taken at 5-foot depth intervals in conjunction with performing Standard
Penetration Tests (SPT). After comp letion, B-1 was backfilled with bentonite, and a
concrete surface patch was placed. At B-2 and B-3, 2-inch diameter standpipe
groundwater observation wells were installed, and protective surface monuments were
placed. The approximate exploration locations are shown on Figure 2.
Soil
Where the surface was paved, the pavement section consisted of less than I inch of
asphalt concrete. Soil conditions encountered in the borings were variable, but there
was a correlation between borings that included the 5 following units, in order of
increasing depth.
Sand, sand with some silt, silty sand. This unit was 4 to 14 feet thick, and the
top 3 feet was classified as fill in B- I and B-3. It ranged from medium dense to
dense.
2. Sandy silt, silt. This unit was interpreted to be 4 to 12 feet thick. It extended to
depth 13 to 18 feet, and it was very dense.
3. Clay. This unit was interpreted to be 5 t6 I I feet thick. It extended to depth 12
to 29 feet, and it was hard.
4. Silty sand, sand. This unit was interpreted to be 3 to 8 feet thick. It extended to
depth 24 and 27 feet in B-1 and B-2, and it was very dense. It was not noted in
B-3.
5. Layered sand, silty sand, silt, sandy silt and clay. This unit extended to the
termination depth in each boring (34 to 39 feet). It was very dense.
The soil type and order of these units were fairly consistent with soil conditions
. observed for the project north of this project, across Walnut Street, as presented in a
previous geotechnical report prepared by PanGEO, Inc.
THE IbLEY GROUP9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 4 of 17
Groundwater
Perched water, as evidenced by water on the drill rods or wet samples, was encountered
during drilling at depths of about 3 to 5 feet. It is common for near -surface water to
percolate through the upper, more permeable soil (in this case, sand, silty sand), and
stop on the underlying, less permeable so il (in this case, sandy silti silt). This is referred
to as "perched water". Volumes of perched water typically are greatest- during the wet
winter months, and they decrease (or disappear) during the drier parts of the year.
Water was also noted deeper in the borings. This likely represented the groundwater
table. At the end of drilling, the depth to water in B-1 was measured at 21 feet.
Because the water level was measured at the end of drilling, and did not have time to
stabilize, it probably did not represent the static water level.
At B-2 and B-3, 2-inch diameter standpipe groundwater observation wells were
installed to allow long term monitoring of groundwater levels. The measured levels
should represent st abilized, static groundwater levels. Dates and depths, to water are
presented below. So far, the water table has been in or above the clay or silt unit (units
2 and 3), both of which are relatively impermeable, and we suspect the source of water
is probably the. underlying sand or layered units (units 4 and 5). If this were. the case,
the water in units 4 and/or 5 would be under artesian pressure. The 2-inch diameter
wells could be pumped -out to further evaluate groundwater levels, artesian pressure
conditions, and/or recharge rates. This was not done under our current scope of work.
Table 1.
Depth to Groundwater (feet)
Date
Boring B-2
Boring B-3
both installed 17JAN2003
17JAN2003
24.5
installed 17 JAN; not yet stabilized
24JAN2003
16.0
12.8
04FEB2003
16.0
12.8
THE RILEY. GROUP9 INC.
I
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 5 of 17
More detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on
the Boring Logs, Figures A-2 through A-7. A description of terms used for soil
classification is presented on Figure A-1.
SEISNHC CONSIDERATIONS
The site is located within Zone 3 of the Seismic Zone Map shown as Figure 16-2 of the
1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). This corresponds to a Seismic Zone Factor, Z, of
0.30. This, in turn, corresponds to an effective peak horizontal ground acceleration of
0.3g. It is our opinion that site conditions best fit the UBC description for Soil Profile
Type Sc, "Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock". We assumed the design seismic even t was
a Magnitude 7-1/2 earthquake with a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.3g.
Liquefaction is typically associated with loose, saturated fine to medium sand.
Considering that the majority of soil was medium dense to very dense or hard, it is our
opinion that the potential for liquefaction at this site during an earthquake is not
significant.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Based on our study, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed
construction from a geotechnical standpoint. The building can be supported on
conventional shallow spread footings bearing on hard or dense native soil. The
proposed cantilevered soldier pile wall shoring system appears feasible from a
geotechnical standpoint.
Detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical design
considerations are provided in the following sections of this report.
THE RILEY GROUP9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report February 7, 2003
Proposed Holly Park Building Project No. 2003-007
Edmonds, Washington Page 6 of 17
Excavation
The proposed construction will require cuts to about 15 to 25 feet below existing grade.
The structural engineer intends to,use shoring consisting of cantilevered soldier piles in
combination with temporary cut slopes for the deeper parts of the excavation (along the
east wall). We understand this approach . was used successfully for the excavation
recently completed for the 5th and Walnut project.
Temporga Cut Slopes
We expect that unsupported temporary cut slopes will be used mostly for.the upper
portion of excavation for the east wall. Based on B-3, we expect that the cuts will be
made mostly in sand or silty sand. For these soil conditions, we recommend temporary
cut slopes that are not subjected to seepage forces be no steeper than 1-1/2 horizontal to
I vertical- (1-1/211: IV). If there were seepage, such as due to perched water, slopes at
this inclination should be expected to be unstable. They could require slope protection,
such as a rock blanket, or might need to be made less steep.
Shoring
Some of the cuts are deeper than are typically shored with cantilever piles. To reduce
the height of the shoring, the upper portion of the excavation is planned to be completed
as a cut slope, and the lower portion will be supported with cantilever soldier piles. In
areas of lesser depths of excavation, cantilever piles could be used to support the full
height of excavation.
Our recommended earth pressures, parameters, and assumptions for design of a
cantilever wall with a flat (level) backslope are presented on Figure 3. Those for design
of a cantilever wall with a 1-1/211AV backslope are, presented on Figure 4. The
pressures (with the exception of the traffic surcharge) are presented in terms of
Tim RILEY GROUP9 INC.
--- ------ ---
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page - 7 of 17
equivalent fluid density; i.e., a triangular earth pressure distribution equivalent to that
which would be exerted by a fluid with the density noted.
The following assumptions and recommendations apply to both figures.
The water table was assumed'to be at the base of the excavation, on both
sides of the soldier pile wall.
Active pressure above the base of the excavation acts on the full center -to -
center pile spacing.
Below the base of the excavation, active pressure acts on I pile diameter,
and passive pressure acts, on 2 pile diameters.
A general trffic surcharge of 50 pounds per square foot (psf), where
applicable, should be applied.
Other surcharges, such as from nearby (within a horizontal distance equal to
the subsurface height of the wall) equipment or stockpiled materials, should
be considered on an individual basis.
Lagging can be designed for pressures equal to 50 percent of those shown for design of
piles, due to arching effects.
A monitoring program should be implemented to verify the performance of the shoring
system and evaluate possible effects of theexcavation on adjacent buildings, streets,
and properties. The first step in this program should consist of surveying building,
streets, and properties around the project, setting reference points for horizontal and
vertical control, setting monitoring points, and documenting the condition of the
buildings and streets. The documentation should include a photographic record.
Monitoring of the shoring system should be done daily as the excavation proceeds, and
then weekly once the excavation is completed. A registered land surveyor should be
DiE RiLEY GROUP9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 8 of 17
retained to establish the baseline data, and to complete a survey every 2 weeks to check
the contractor's readings. Daily monitoring data can be done by the contractor.
Monitoring should continue until the permanent subsurface walls are adequately braced.
Monitoring should include surveying the vertical and horizontal alignment of the top of
each soldier pile. Monitoring points should also be established at the middle height of
the shoring at 25-foot horizontal intervals. These mid -level points should also be
surveyed to record horizontal and vertical movements. Th e project's strucbHal and
geotechnical engineers should review the monitoring data weekly, and at any time there
is unexpected movement.
Groundwater Manaizement
It is our opinion that there is shallow perched water, and deeper water that likely
represents the groundwater table. The volume and flow rate of perched water will
likely Aecrease in the drier parts of the year. The volume and flow rate of the deeper
water could be evaluated with the observation wells that were installed during drilling.
Near surface conditions in B-3 included about 10 feet of wet sand, and perched water at
about depth 3 feet. This would result in seepage on temporary cut slopes, and would
make them unstable. Accordingly, unless the perched water level is lowered, either
naturally (during the dry season) or by dewatering, to below the toe of the cut slope, the
slope should not be expected to be stable. There are similar concerns for soldier piles
and conventional wood lagging - if the perched water level were high, the. sand would
likely run into the excavation before lagging could be installed. Trenches might be
effective in lowering the perched water level. Otherwise, well points could be used.
We understand that for the 5th and Walnut project, the space between soldier piles was
filled with lean concrete as the piles were installed, to act as lagging later when
excavation started. This approach should be considered for this project.
THE FULEY GROUP9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 9 of 17
The volume and potential flow rate of the deeper water source is not apparent at this
time. If it is limited, the excavation could be dewatered with sumps and pumps. If it is
not limited, well points and/or deep wells could be necessary. The observation wells
that were installed during drilling could be used to evaluate potential groundwater flow
rates.
Site Preparation and Gradin
Site Preparation
The first step of construction should be to demolish existing structures. Any utilities
that are in the proposed building footprint should be relocated to outside of the building
footprint. Pavement should be stripped.
The near -surface soil exposed after stripping should be silty sand or sand. The sand
should be suitable for reuse as fill. The silty sand is moisture sensitive, and will be
difficult, if not impossible, to work with if it is not near optimum moisture content. The
underlying silt and clay are not suitable for reuse as fill. Reuse of excavated soil for fill
later in the project would require a place to stockpile it.
It appears that there will not be much fill required, and that it will be limited to the east
side of the building where temporary cut slopes are used. Prior to placing fill, we
recommend proofrolling all exposed surfaces with a heavy piece of rubber -tired
construction equipment (such as a loaded dump truck) to evaluate if, any soft and
yielding areas are present. If yielding areas are observed, they should be cut to firm
bearing soil and filled to grade with structural fill. After cut areas are brought to final
grade, . they also should be proofrolled and repaired. As discussed above, the excavated
silty sand is moisture sensitive, and will be difficult, if not impossible, to work in wet
weather and/or if it is not near optimum moisture content.
THEAMEY GROUP� INC.
7777--
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page . 10 of 17
Fill Material
It may be feasible to use the sand or silty sand from excavation as fill in dry weather, if
it is free of organics and debris, and properly moisture conditioned. This would require
stockpiling it somewhere. If it is decided not to stockpile it, and structural fill material
is required, we recommend importing material that meets the following gradation
requirements.
Table 2.
U.S. Standard Sieve Size
Percent Passing
3 inches
100 percent
No. 4 sieve
0 - 75 percent
No. 200 sieve
0 - 5 percent
*Based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction.
Prior to use, Riley should examine and test all materials imported to the site for use as
structural fill. A geotechnical engineer should be on site to monitor the site grading and
verify soil compaction.
Structural Fill Placement
For.the purpose of this report, structural fill is defined as fill that will support buildings,
slab�s-on-grade, pavement, and other settlement sensitive elements. Structural fill
should be placed in uniform loose layers not more than 12 inches thick and compacted
to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test
Designation D-1557 (Modified Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of
compaction should be within about 2 percent of its optimum.
Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes
If permanent cut or fill slopes are incorporated into design, they should not be steeper
than 2H: IV.
'- � THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page I I of 17
Foundation Support
We expect that soil at footing bearing elevation (about Elevation 60 to 65 feet) will
probably consist of hard clay. However, considering the variable soil conditions, it
could also be very dense silt or sand. 'All of these soils have been glacially
consolidated, and if undisturbed, they will be suitable to provide high design bearing
pressures for conventional shallow spread footings.
If the footing bearing surface is disturbed, it should be overexcavated to expose
competent hard or very dense native soil, and replaced with compacted, well -graded,
granular, structural fill. The term "granular" refers to soil that is predominantly sand
and/or gravel, -and that is not predominantly silt or clay. The exposed subgrade should
be cleaned of loose or soft soil before placing the structural fill. If it is not feasible to
place and compact structural fill of the type described above (such as if there is water in
the footing excavation), rock spalls or crushed rock could be used instead. Lean
concrete could also be used; if it is used, it should have an unconfined compressive
strength of at least 50 to 80 pounds per square inch.
If there are any near -surface exterior footings, they should bear at least 1.5 feet below
final exterior grade for frost protection, and their 'allowable design bearing pressure
should be evaluated on an individual basis. Interior (garage level) footings should bear
at least 1.5 feet below the floor slab. We recommend footing widths of atleast 18 and
24 inches for continuous strip footings.and isolated column footings, respectively.
We recommend that a geotechnical engineer be present on site to inspect the foundation
subgrade preparation before pouring concrete. The foundation subgrade should be
undisturbed and hard or very dense. If loose or disturbed soil is observed, it should be
removed and replaced with structural fill or crushed rock. The clay and silt will
deteriorate rapidly if exposed to moisture and/or foot traffic. If prepared footing
THE FJLEY GROUP9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 12 of 17
subgrades are to remain exposed during the winter season or periods of wet weather, it
is recommended that they be covered with a lean concrete "mud mat" to help protect the
subgrades after they have been inspected and until the footings are poured.
For footings constructed as recommended, and bearing on undisturbed, competent (very
dense or hard) native soil, we recommend a design allowable bearing pressure of not
more than 5000 pounds per square foot (psf). For short-term loads, such as wind and
seismic, a 1/3 increase in this allowable bearing pressure can be used, as long as this
conforms with the appropriate current UBC loading combinations.
With the expected structural loading and the recommended foundation bearing pressure,
total settlement of footings should not be more than I inch, and differential settlement
between adjacent footings or across a distance of about 20 feet should not be more than
1/2 inch. We expect that most of the settlement will occur by the end of construction.
Lateral forces may be resisted by friction at the base of foundations and by passive soil
resistance acting against the buried portion of foundations. To compute passive
resistance, we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pounds per cubic
foot (pcf). This value is based on the foundations being const ructed neat against
undisturbed competent soil or backfilled with structural fill. The upper I foot of soil
should not be included in the passive resistance calculation because it can become
disturbed by weather and/or future grading activity. For base friction, a factor of 0.5
may be used between concrete and soil. The coefficient of friction should be applied to
the vertical dead load only. These values include a safety factor of about 1.5 and 2
applied to the estimated ultimate values for frictional and passive. resistance,
respectively.
Tim FJLEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 13 of 17
Slabs-on-Gra�e
Subgrades for slabs -on -grade should be proofrolled'and repaired as necessary, as
described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. If the on site soil
can not be compacted to provide a dense and unyielding surface, it should be replaced
with I foot of compacted structural fill. Immediately below the floor slab, we
recommend placing a 6-inch thick capillary break layer consisting of clean, free -
draining gravel or sand and gravel that has less than 5 percent fines (material passing a
U.S. No. 200. sieve). This material will reduce the potential for upward capillary
movement of waterfi7om the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of the floor slab.
A suitable vapor barrier should be placed on top of the capillary break. The vapor
barrier may be covered with 2 inches of clean, moist sand to guard against damage to
the vapor barrier during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete.
Even though wall drains (as recommended later in this report) should draw the
groundwater level at the wall down to the base of the wall, it would be prudent to install
an underdrain system below the garage floor slab to control potential ground water
seepage. A typical underslab drain system would consist of parallel perforated pipes
placed on about 20-foot centers in a fi7ee-draining gravel layer about I foot thick. The
pipes would feed to collector pipes or headers, which would probably drain to a sump
from which water could be pumped. The cost of an underslab drain system would have
to be weighed against the likelihood of groundwater rising to the point that it could
affect the floor slab.
Subsurface Walls
Basement walls should be waterproofed and fully drained. We recommend a drainage
system consisting of pre -fabricated drainage panels, such as Miradrain, that are attached
to the lagging face and connected to a pipe at the base of the wall. The pipe should then
be tightlined through the footing to collector pipes that lead to a sump for discharge of
collected water. A typical wall drainage detail is shown on Figure 5
THE FULEY GROUP9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 14 of 17
If basement walls are constructed against the temporary shoring, they can be designed
for the same pressures that were recommended for the shoring.
If basement. walls are constructed, and then backfilled (such as in the temporary cut
slope areas), different design wall pressures apply. The lateral pressure acting on the
wall is dependent on the nature and density of the soil behind the wall, the amount of
lateral wall movement which can occur as backfill is placed, wall drainage conditions,
and the inclination of the backfill. Subsurface walls should be provided with wall
drains, as described above. For walls that are free to yield at the top at least 0.001 times
the height of the wall (active condition), soil pressures will be less than if movement is
limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing (at -rest condition). We recommend
that walls supporting horizontal backfill and not subjected to hydrostatic forces be
designed using a triangular earth pressure distribution equivalent to that exerted by a
fluid with a density of 35 pcf for yielding (active condition) walls, and 55 pcf for non -
yielding (at -rest condition) walls.
These recommended lateral earth pressures are based on the assumption of a horizontal
ground surface adjacent to the wall for a distance of at least the subsurface height of the
wall, and do not account for surcharges. Additional lateral earth pressures should be
considered for surcharge loads acting adjacent to subsurface walls and within a distance
equal to the subsurface height of the wall. This would include the effects of surcharges
such as traffic loads, floor slab loads, or other surface loads. Increased lateral earth
pressure due to adjacent areal vertical surcharge pressures (such as uniform floor slab
loads) can be taken as a uniform pressure equal to 0.3 times the vertical surcharge
pressure for active conditions, and 0.5 times the vertical surcharge pressure for at -rest
conditions. Traffic. surcharges are often accounted for by assuming a surcharge
equivalent to 2 feet of soil, which corresponds to about 250 psf vertical pressure.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report February 7, 2003
Proposed Holly Park Building Project No. 2003-007
Edmonds, Washington Page 15 of 17
Lateral forces on subsurface retaining walls can be resisted by fHction and passive
resistance, as described for footings, as well as by structural elements of the building.
Drainne
Construction
We expect that water encountered during construction could come from shallow
perched water, or deeper water that likely represents the groundwater table. Drainage
during construction is discussed in the Gro undwater Management section of this report.
Surface
Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage, away from the building.
Water should not pond or collect adjacent to the immediate building area. We
recommend providing a drainage gradient of at least 3 percent for a distance of at least
io feet from the building perimeter.
Subsurface
We recommend that wall drains be installed for all subsurface walls. This is discussed
in the Subsurface Walls section of this report. We also recommend that an underslab
drain system be considered for the garage floor slab. This is discussed in the Slabs -on
Grade section of this report.
Utilities
Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public
Works Association (APWA) specifications. For site utilities located within the City of
Edmonds right-of-ways, bedding and backfill should be completed ' in accordance with
City of Edmonds specifications. As a minimum, trench backfill should be placed and
compacted as structural fill, as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section.
THE RILEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
. February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 16 of 17
Where utilities are located below unimproved areas where some settlement of trench
backfill is acceptable, the degree of compaction can be reduced to at least 90 percent of
the maximum dry density as determined by the referenced ASTM D- 15 57 standard.
LEVHTATIONS
This report has been prepared for Fifth Avenue Development, LLC. It is intended for
specific application to the proposed Holly Park Building in Edmonds, Washington, and
for the exclusive use of Fifth Avenue Development and their authorized representatives.
The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained
from the explorations on site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and
extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear
evident, The Riley Group should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations in this
report prior to proceeding further with construction.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget for our services, we have
attempted to complete our work in accordance with generally accepted pro&ssional
principles and practices in the field of geotechnical engineering followed in this area at
the time this report was prepared. No warranty, express or implied, is made.
THE FJLEY GROUP, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Proposed Holly Park Building
Edmonds, Washington
February 7, 2003
Project No. 2003-007
Page 17 of 17
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions or
comments concerning this report, or if we can provide additional services, please call.
Tm RiELEY GRoup, INc.
Al.
AS 0
0 .<--. V�
0 �� 19491
GIST'?,
0 NAL
William M. KOck, P.E. EXPiFtES
Senior Engineer
Report Distribution Fifth Avenue Development (3 bound copies)
Attachments Figure I
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure A- I
Figures A-2 to A-7
Site Vicinity Map
Site and Exploration Plan
Shoring Pressure Diagram (Flat Backslope)
Shoring Pressure Diagram (I - 1/211: IV Backslope)
Typical Wall Drainage Detail
Unified Soil Classification System
Boring Logs (B-I through B-3)
THE RILEY GROUP9 INC.
00
-'Wy
EDMONDS -': VIM:
>
R 3RD'
s
OD
TH
--,Ail�.
lib
00
6M AV
4- BLVt)j
(S
s
1; m-
lilt 2 6TH
6TH. AV
CD V
7TH "AV s low
PT 7TH
AV g
low
;,—A
AV F11
KAV
. %
; AV. r.
rn
* ' J97
i C4
Como AV
FA V k-.
100TH:.. .
"D
Al "
.
I luui
-9TH
-,IDIDI
6, SFAVISTA'PL
98TW AV.
W�
�A%
u2m r'a
13� 1,1 97TH
ism
�_- PL
L
J) 0
Lb
; . s
1
--j6TH i -2
t P �21700
VAV Q �5 w
'c
T.
4
con
,
45TH PL W
STH PL
ULT Pic
01i
:910
12
2M
0
C/I
13 9iRD "TH
PL
ie
LW
90
N 94TH
C:l
QpNn k AV
92NO
!�
a
!qi
0%
9, m
CD
cn R4E.
0 C.
90TH AV
HIL�R
-
le
isT.: PL
.
9 Ist
"Ew
12
Yge-7-.
p
lei
93. sm
� 6 . ..- . :*�
I. � q
001n. rL, W
) Ae El
-
I
1.1419
90TI
SU`VS
�Wy
A
. . . . . . . . . . . .
19 AV
t
87TH '20000
6TH PL W -* - -
4
88TH 1"00 j9ww
A
PL W
L
FL V
W
1.3 7
,
im
5
V 85TH
LN
r
.
mg le 9 .
=J L 10
. .:.
—K W
IWTH
'e P, ,Ig;,
I
4
I
185TH PL ; & N !I v - C).,
84TH
SMTH WAV
J6
C
I '1
0,
14
- AV
1 F.
85TH
PL w
84TH
84TH:::'l
(N rRuN
. ;2 w I?
kv WOOD E
. P
AV W 1�e
-01U—PL __I TH -�j
AV w
ca
VPL
im
J3 AV w
0
"XI
Z41
83p.D AV W
82ND PL W
tND
F
14
c 02 p
ie
I
AV -W
1 '
AV W
82N6 IV
-2 . . 411 193M
;w r 2
.. 1i 82 vil
I k w
Cb
PL W AV'
OIST I
AV-71
s!
i 81ST,
,e 8:
SM W.'.
A
Vie ljq; I �;89 -em—W
LST jAVie 4
12.*. AV -W
W
IST p
19600
0 W.
PL'
AN ST
3 OOVTR
t2 ;111;1
ie ie 4
W,
Mai '8OTH 6 It.
GOT .
i 19366F
XV
1_ 'f JZ ;kt'7—?
I
6
Reference- 'Holly Park Building", by Chenoweth &
Associates, dated 19 Dec. 2002
-0�- Boring locations by The Riley Group on January 17, 2003
B-3
PER The Riley Group, In a Proposed Holly Park Bilikki'29
10728 LAKE CITY WAY NE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125 Site and Exploration Plan Figure 2
Site Address: SE Comer Walnut Street & 5 th Avenue-$— Efwn-nds, Washington
WOOD LAGGING
CONCRETE FACING
CONTINUOUS MIRADRAIN 6000 OR
EQUIVALENT
.4
NATIVE SOIL SLAB -ON -GRADE FLOOR
EXCAVATION
............ .........
FA I F
............... .......
ffTE±� .......................
_�]I PVC TIGHTLINE ............... ....
.......................
A . . ....................
.... STRUCTURAL.*.".
FILL
AV. ................
. ... ....... ....... .......
. ....... ..............
...... ......
........ .......
......... .............
...... ...... .
A FOUNDATION'
DRAIN GRATE A ........... .........
...................... .......
. ......................
NOTE:
DRAIN THROUGH WALL SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT MIDDLE OF
LAGGING.
The Riley Group, Inc.
10728 LAKE CrrY WAY NE Typical
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125
Site -Address: -SE
Proposed Holly Park Building
-all Drainage Detail
mer Walnut Street & 5 th A,
Figure 5
EARTH PRESSURE DESIGN PARAMETERS
FOR SOLDIER PILE CANTILEVER WALL - FLAT BACKSLOPE
-F
10 ft
Passive Earth
Pressure = 250 pcf
taken over 2 pile
diameters
Note: Value includes
Safety Factor of
1.5.
Passive
FFAJ
30 pcf
Active
+ 50 psf
25 pc (Traffic Surcha r
where applicabley
15 pcf over 1 pile diameter
below base of excavation
I
NOT TO SCALE
Note - Active pressure taken over full center -to -center pile spacing above base of excavation
Active pressure taken over 1 pile diameter below base of excavation
Passive pressure taken over 2 pile diameters below base of excavation
Proposed Holly Park Building
EPPMANWA.. e.Riley Group, Inc.
M91111110A, 10728 LAK CITY WAY NE
Shoring Pressure Diagram Figure 3
SEArrLE,W..ASHTNGT0N98125
Site Address: SE Comer Walnut.Street..&, �diAveniie S.,. E,d_i�,on4s, Washingtoi
EARTH PRESSURE DESIGN PARAMETERS
FOR SOLDIER PILE CANTILEVER WALL - I-I/2H:IV BACKSLOPE
121*
Passive. Eart h T
Pressure = 250 pcf
taken over-2 pile
diameters
Note: Value includes
Safety Factor of
1.5. A -
Passive .
IIIIII=MIII
43 pcf
Active
+ 50 psf
(Traffic Surcharge
where applicable)
15 pcf over 1 pile diameter
below base of excavation
NOT TO SCALE
Note - Active pressure taken over full center -to -center pile spacing above base of excavation
Active pressure taken over 1 pile diameter below base of excavation
Passive pressure taken over 2 pile diameters below base of excavation
The Riley Group, Inc. Proposed Holly . Park Building
10728 LAKE CITY WAY NE Shoring Preqsure Diaggram. Figure 4
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125
Sitc Addrcss: SE-Cor��r-W-.alnut,Streeti&.5th.4v�nue� S., Edmonds, Was
MAJOR DIVISIONS
LETTER
TYPICAL DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL
GRAVELS
CLEAN
GW
went -graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little
or no fines.
More than 50%
GRAVELS
GP
Poody-graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures,'
W
.2
of coarse
<5% fines
little or no fines.
GM
Silty gravels gravel -sand -silt mixtures,
i1nes.
z ffi W
.= >
fraction is
a)
4-
T)
M
larger than No.
GRAVELS
non -plastic
GC
Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay mixtures,
10� 0 20 50
4 sieve
with fines
0
plastic fines.
SANDS
CLEAN
Sw
Well -graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no
W 0 6
CO
LO
c
M
z
c
cc
More than 50%
SANDS
fines.
SID
Poorly -graded sands or gravelly sands, little or
<
=
=
Of coarse
<5% fines
no fines.
SANDS
SM
Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures, non -plastic fines.
a)
0 L_
0
fraction is
2
smaller than
No. 4 sieve
with fines
SC
Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures, plasfic fines.
a)
>
ML
inorganic silts, rock tiour, clayey silts with slight
Q
.91
SILTS AND CLAYS
plasticity.
CL
Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean
clay).
a) (n
w 4- 0
ca 0
Liquid limits
z
g
E
-
g-
c,4
6
less than 50%
OL
Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity.
Q
U)
LO
C
ca
z
C
ca
MH
Inorganic silts, elastic.
LL1
_C
SILTS AND CLAYS
z
ci)
43)
Liquid limits greater
CH
Inorganic clays of high plasticity, (fat clays).
LL
L_
0
=
W
E
than 50%
OH
Organic clays of high plasticity.
01
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
PT
Peat.
DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS
_j
Density SPT (Blows/Foot)
Very loose 0-4
2" Outside diameter split spoon
0
W
sampler
a
Z
>
Loose 4-10
Medium dense 10-30
2.4" Inside diameter ring sampler or
T
Dense 30-50
Shelby tube
Very dense >50
Water level (date)
Tr Torvane reading, tsf
Consistency SPT (Blows/Foot)
Very soft 0-2
pp Penetrometer reading, tsf
0
Soft 2-4
DD Dry density, pcf
F_
Medium stiff 4-8
LL Liquid limit, percent
stiff 8-16
PI Pla;ticity index
Very stiff 16-32
N Standard penetration, blows per foot
Hard >32
W.R. Th e R i1ey Gro up, In c.
Proposed Holly Park Building
Unified Soil Classification System
Figure A-]
10728 LAKE CITY WAY NE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125
Site Address: SE Comer Walnut Street& 5thkvenue S.. Edmo ,W
64 _,ashipgtpn
Boring No. B-I
Logged by: WMK
Date: 1/17/03 Approximate Elev.: 79
Consistency/
a)
(N)
Moisture
Soil Description
Relative
Dept
CL
E
Blows
Content
Density
(feet)
'u
CO
/ft
Silty sand, dark brown, fine to
3/4 inch AC
coarse, occasional charcoal,
Medium
moist, SM, (fill)
Dense
24
13
sana, momed tan & brOWn, tine to menum,
moist, SP
Medium Dense
- minor perched water -5 feet
5
Sandy silt, grey, fine sand,
with lenses of silty fine sand,
Very Dense
57
23
moist, ML
10
50/6"
18
LL=35
Silt, grey, with lenses of silty
Very Dense
fine sand and clay, moist, ML
PI=12
15
Clay, grey, occasional silt
partings, moist, high plasticity,
LL=53
CH
- with 1 inch layer sand, grey,
Hard
86
28
PI=27
fine to medium, very moist
20
(1/17/03)
Silty sand, grey, fine, wet, SM
Very Dense
68
23
The Riley Group, Ina
Proposed Holly Park Building
Test Boring Log B-I —F—Figure
A-2
10728LAK CITYWAYNE
SEATTLE , W..AS"INGTON 98125
:MOIL
Site Address: SE Corii" Walnut Street & 5 th Avenue S., Edz�onds, Wis
Boring No. B-1 (cont.)
Logged by: WMK
Date: 1/17/03 Approximate Elev.: 79
Consistency/
a)
(N)
Moisture
Soil Description
Relative
Depth
a'
E
Blows
Content
Density
(feet)
U)
I
/ft
N.
Layered: sand, grey, fine; silty
sand, grey, fine; and silt, grey.
Very Dense
50/5.5"
24
Sand is wet, SP, SK and ML
30
- bad blow count / probable
heave
35
14
Bottom of boring at 34 feet
Depth to water: 21 feet on 17
Jan. 2003 (at time of drilling)
40
45
MEM-20 The Riley Group, Inc.
Proposed Holly Park Building
Test Boring -Log B-1 717
Figure A-3
10728LAK CITYWAYNE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125
64N
_.j
91tie-Address: SE Co`rner.Watnut Street& 5th Avenue,S.,-Edriaonds
Boring No. B-2
Logged by: WMK
Date: 1/17/03 Approximate Elev.: 81
Consistency/
(N)
Moisture
Soil Description
Relative
Depth
a'
E
Blows
Content
Density
(feet)
'0
U)
- /ft
N
<1 inch AC
Sand, brown, fine to medium,
some silt, wet, SP/SM
Medium
23
Dense
5
Sand, mottled brown & red
brown, fine to medium, some
silt, very moist, SP/SM
Dense
10
46
Sandy silt, grey, fine sand,
occasional gravel (3/8 in),
moist, ML
Very Dense
50/4.5"
10
20
Hard
15
Clay, grey, with silt partings,
(1 /24/03)
moist, high plasticity, CH
(2/4/03)
20
56
38
Sand, grey, fine to medium,
trace silt, occasional thin silt
layers, wet, SP
- water on rods at depth of 24
Very Dense
815
(1/17/03)
feet
Proposed Holly Park Building
MRS Hey Group, Inc.
PER The R
Test Boring Log B-2
Figure A-4
InMEW'A 10728 LAKE CITY WAY NE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125
J.-ii-te.Address:
_T
SE Comer Walnut -Street &-5-th,.Av.enue..S.,Ed6io�ds..Washingfon
a -
Boring No. B-2 (cont.)
Logged by :- WMK
Date: 1/17/03 Approximate Elev.: 81
Consistency/
(N)
Moisture
Soil Description
Relative
Depth
E
Blows
Content
Density
(feet)
'
U)
/ft
N
50/5"
Layered: sand, grey, fine; silty
sand, grey, fine; sandy silt,
Very Dense
30
grey; and clay, grey. Sand is
wet, SP, SM, and CH
35
50
29
Bottom of boring at 34 feet
Observation well installed to
32 feet, screened from 32-22
feet
Depth to water
40
24.5 feet on 17 Jan. 2003
16.0 feet on 24 Jan. 2003
16.0 feet on 04 Feb. 2003
45
The Riley Group, Inc.
Proposed Holly Park Building
Test Boring Log B-2
Figure A-5
10728 LAKE CITY WAY NE
SEATTLE, WASH INGTON 98125
Site Address:.SE-Corner.-W-alnut Street & 5th Avenue S., Ed�aonds, Wa�*g6'n
Boring No. B-3
Logged by: WMK
Date: 1/17/03 Approximate Elev.: 89
Consistency/
(N)
Moisture
Soil Description
Relative
Depth
CL
E
Blows
Content
Density
(feet)
'
CO
/ft
N
S�ilty sand, dark brown, fine to
Dirt and thin gravel
medium, some angular gravel,
Medium
moist, SM, (fill)
Dense
20
Sand, grey -brown, fine to
Medium
medium, trace silt, wet, SP
Dense
5
- —7 feet - drills gravelly
39.
Gravelly sand, grey, fine to
Dense
coarse, some silt, wet, SW
10
Silty sand, grey, fine to
coarse, some gravel, moist,
Very Dense
(1 /24/03)
SM, (till -like)
15
82
(2/4/03)
Layered: sandy silt, grey; and
silty sand, grey, fine, moist,
IML and SM
- water on rods at depth of 17
Very Dense
V (1/17/03)
feet
91
27
20
Clay, grey, moist, high
Hard
plasticity, CH
49
36
- with silt partings, fractured,
some slickensides
The Riley Group, Inc.
�-J
Proposed Holly Park Building
Test Boring Log B-3
Figure A-.6
10728 AKE CITY WAY NE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125
-Site-Address: SE Corner.Walnut Street& 5th Avenue S nnd
.1. � � I .. 1, 1�1 . .� 17_Edr� , _W_W�Igt6n -
Boring No. B-3 (cont.)
Logged by: WMK
Date: 1/17/03 Approximate Elev.: 89
Consistency/ a) (N) Moisture
Soil Description Relative Depth cL
E Blows Content
Density (feet) /ft
co N
- less fractured, more massive
30
11 85 1 21
Layered: silty sand, grey, fine;
sand, grey, fine; and clay, Very Dense 50/609
grey. Sand is wet, SM, SP,
and CH 35
- water on rods at depth 33
feet
Bottom of boring at 39 feet
Observation well installed to 37
feet, screened from 37-27 feet
Depth to water:
17 ft on 17 Jan. 2003 (on rods)
33 ft on 17 Jan. 2003 (on rods)
12.8 feet on 24 Jan. 2003
12.8 feet on 04 Feb. 2003
40
45
11 50/3"
Y (1/17/03)
The Riley Group, Inc. Proposed Holly Park Buildin I g
10728 LAKE CITY WAYNE Test Boring Log B-3 Figure,4-7
S EAT7LE, WA S H INGTON 98125
Site Address: SE Comer Walnut Street & 5th A-�enue S.. Edniond. Wasb
Thornquist, Linda
From: Startzman, Jeanne r
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:39 PM
To: Westfall, John; Chave, Rob; Clugston, Michael; Cunningham, Diane; Bjorback, Leif,
Harrison, Marie; Thornquist, Linda; English, Robert; Luttrell, Megan; McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: Pierce Records Request Received 11-8-13 Gregory Condos
Hello —
Regarding Ms. Pierce's request for all documents/records regarding the Gregory Condos at 505 _Sth"Avenue, I sent her
an estimated date of Friday, December 6, as when records should be available for review. I also indicated to her that it
may.be a partial assembly of records.
You can bring your records down to the City Clerk's Office anytime.
Thanks,
Jeanne Startzman
Public Disclosure & Records Management Specialist
City Clerk's Office - 425-775-2525
8
04
Cl)
(0
�N
1st surface applied digital graphic
applied to transluscent push-thru panel. M-IE--- Ge
36" Cabinet face to have 4" x 4" square routed 12" ms�en
from face to accommodate acrylic panel. C 0 R � 0 R A Irl 0 N
37 South Hudson Street
Seattle, Washington 98134
st surface applied vinyl logo & copy 206-623-4525
wif vinyl graphic element ( cross 206-622-2894 Fax
DOUBLE FACE MONUMENT SIGN
40 The GREGORY
Edmonds, WA
gal JOB SITE ADDRESS
60" x 36" cabinet constructed of aluminum tube
framework & 1/8" aluminum skin. Completed 505 5th Avenue So.
cabinet to be painted: TBD Edmonds, WA 98103
1/2
Retail A
SIGN FABRICATOR MESSENGER CORP
Retail B 37 So. Hudson St. / Seattle WA 98134
CONTACT: Jon Haroldson 206.623.4525
Retail C
Retail D
Project Number: 71664
37" x 36" x 3/16" hi -impact translucent acrylic
Retail E panel w/ 1 st surface applied black vinyl copy
5/24 /07 Issued Date
Retail F
11 /16 /07 PERMIT Date
1 1/2
6" 12/11 /07 revision Date
. IL DRAWING TITLE
18" x 48" masonry structure by others
�'AFP-
A
MONUMENT SIGN
V6
'E�44" Typeface: Rotis Serif
FRONT VIEW END VIEW
SCALE: 3/4"= V-0" SCALE: 3/4"=l'-O
36" This publication is protected under the United
1 4 i — ill 101, ill States Copyright Act of 1976 and includes all
32" 2- 6" CITY OF EDMONDS 18" 18" other applicable intemational, federal, state and
local laws, and all ights are reserved.
4 4" 4 ea. '/2"X 6"QUIK BOLTS 4" BUILDING DEPARTMENT The artwork contained herein is proprietary and
I is the legal property of Messenger Corporation.
WOW Please be advised that any unauftrized use,
RESUB
ADDPESS L!5-0,.6- 1f:74,00% duplication, disclosure and/or distribution of the
C1Af1\'17q contents is considered to be a direct violation of
� 1, . — , - Copyright laws. Messenger Corporation reserves
IL F DEC 112007 the legal rights to distribute Logos. Wordmarks,
Designs and Artwork at it's discretion.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Unauthon ed distribution of the contents of this
EDMONDS document without the prior written consent of
Messenger Corporation is strictly prohibited.
20" 'EXISTING CONCRETE FOOTING PERi`.J2W; (i`�-IJV.11BER
Sheet Num6er
STREET FILE GS.1
65-0" 1
1101-01,
5T VENUE SOPTH
< F �G) 1H)
MONUMENTSIGN
—7
F36" �-F
t
�7
C2��-
Tj
505 5TH AVE. SOUTH
'WA
EDMONDS,,
5
UJ--
0
(:7)-
- — -
NF
8)
NOES.
I ao
10
\�2)
E
---03
UJ
- A
uy
5)
Z
N
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
APPROVED AS NOTED
nv,,�JEERING
\A-7 , I
Datk: �YL �]Z—1 % � 01
I V
RESUB
DEC 112007
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
11m6-s'senGer,,,,,�'
C 0 R P 0 R A T 1 0 N
37 South Hudson Street
Seattle, Washington 98134
206-623-4525
206-622-2894 Fax
The GREGORY
Edmonds, WA
JOB SITE ADDRESS
505 5th Avenue So.
Edmonds, WA 98103
SIGN FABRICATOR / MESSENGER CORP
37 So. Hudson St. / Seattle WA 98134
CONTACT. Jon Haroldson 206.623.4525
Project Number: 71664
5/24 /07 Issued Date
11 /16 /07 PERMIT Date
12/11 /07 revision Date
DRAWING TITLE
MONUMENT SIGN
Typeface: Rotis Serif
This publication is protected under the United
States Copyright Act of 1976 and includes all
other applicable international. federal, state and
local laws, and ail rights are reserved.
The artwork contained herein is proprietary and
is the legal property of Messenger Corporation.
Please be advised that any unauthorized use,
duplication . disclosure and/or distribution of the
contents is considered to be a direct violation of
Copyright laws. Messenger Corporation reserves
the legal rights to distribute Lagos. Wordmarks,
1) esigns and Artwork at it's discretion.
Unauthonzed distribution of the contents of this
document without the prior written consent of
Messenger Corporation is strictly prohibited.
Sheet Num6er
GS.0
1) Any request for alternate design, modification,
variance or other administrative deviation
(hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes,
ordinances or policies must be specifically
requested in writing and be called out and
identified. Processing fees for such request shall be
established by Council and shall be paid upon
submittal and are non-refundable.
2) Approval of any plat or plan containing
provisions which do not comply with city code and
for which a variance has not been specifically
identified, requested and considered by the
appropriate city official in accordance with the
appropriate provision of city code or state law does
not approve any items not to code specification.
cwr 7//S*7
DEC 112007
SUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
STREET FILE
�wd: Skateboarders at the Gregory
same kids who were skateboarding this week in Petosa's parking lot - 3 boys and long
haired girl in a silver car. I have nicely chased skateboarders from below my deck, who
were trying to do jumps on the slate short wall below and the front steps. Will keep a
watch out. Judy
----- Original Message -----
From: "edwin hidano" <ehidano(cbhotmail.com>
To: "houston allen" <hstansal(cD-verizon. net>, "Jerry and Nancy Remy"
<rameYqdr(cDaol.com>, "Dagmar Braun" <dagmarbra u n(&comcast. net>, "Sunny Morgan"
<sailorbrinkie(cDhotmail.com>, "Judy Tilbury" <judytil(cDcomcast. net>, "Ozzie Boyle"
<ozzieboyle(cD-q mail. com>, "Ingrid Wolsk" <i ng ridwolsk(&-g mail. com>, "Nancy Chin"
<nchinla.vahoo.com>, "Dick and Eleanor Taylor' <d-etaylor(a)-clearwire. net>, "Bob
Gregg" <rrq regg(cDcomcast. net>
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 6:48:02 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: RE: Skateboarders at the Gregory
Gregory residents,
I too found teenagers skateboarding in our parking area last Wednesday or Thursday. I
politely told them that this was private property and they had to leave. I also told them
that they had to put Jerrry's red wagon back where they found it and they did. These
were four or five teenagers driving a mid -size silver/gray license number 597PFS. Stan
and Sally it sounds like the same kids that you came across this week. I apologize for
not letting everyone know sooner.
This needs to be a topic of discussion at our next meeting.
ED
• From: hstansal(a)verizon. net
• To:
• Subject: Skateboarders at the Gregory
• Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 18:28:46 -0700
> Hello,
• For the second time in a week I have seen kids (males, approx. 16 to
• 18 years of age) skateboarding in our garage. When they observed me
• the first time, they just hopped in their car and took off. Tonight, I
• confronted them, in a civil manner, and told them skateboarding was
• not allowed and to please not return. I also informed them that this
• was the second time I've seen them skateboarding in the garage. The
• two kids I saw previously, were driving a new, red, Jeep Wrangler with
• a black hard top. No license plate, but the Town and Country
• dealership logo was clearly visible on their spare tire. They were
• accompanied, this time, by two more teenagers (a female and male)
• driving a silver, late model Chevy (possibly an Impala). Didn't catch
2 of 3 1 4/3/09 11:33 AM
Fwd: Skateboarders at the Gregory
Subject: Fwd: Skateboarders at the Gregory
From: "hstansalgverizon.net" <hstansaWverizon.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:59:45 -0700
To: Caron Dwyer <cdwyerl239comcast.net>, Houston Allen <houtekgearthlink.net>, Ozzie Boyle
<Ozzieboyleggmail.com>, Sandy Boyle <boyle.sandy9gmail.com>, Dagmar Braun
<dagmarbraungcomcast.net>, Sunny and Brittany Morgan <sailorbrinkieghotmaii.com>, Lynn Daniel
<1ynn.daniel(@earthlink.net>, Dick and Eleanor Taylor <d-etaylor9cIearwire.net>, Linda Forst
<ls.forst@verizon.net>, Bob Gregg <rrgreggC&comcast.net>, Ed Hidano and Nancy Chin
<ehidano@ hotmail.com>, Jerry and Nancy Ramey <rameygdr0�aol.com>, Joseph Rivera
<jrivera@kappesmiller.com>, Judy Tillbury <judytil9excite.com>, Ingrid Wotsk
<ingridwolsk@gmail.com>, "hstansalgverizon" <hstansal9verizon.net>
We're forwarding this along as a few folks were not on the original distribution list.
This is a great idea from Bob and well worth pursuing.
Stan and Sally
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Bob Gregg" <rrgregg C@ comcast. net>
Date: April 3, 2009 9:02:49 AM PDT
To: <4udytil C@ comcast. net>, Medwin hidano <ehidanoghotmaii.com>
Cc: houston allen <hstansal @ verizon. net>, "'Jerry and Nancy Remy"' -qamevqdr9aoI.com>, "'Dagmar
Braun... <da marbraun 5comcast. net>, "'Sunny Morgan"' <saiIorbrinkieC@hotmaiI.com>, "'Ozzie Boyle"'
< , "'Ingrid Wolsk... <ingridwolsk9cimail.com , "'Nancy Chin
<nchini @Dvahoo.com>, "'Dick and Eleanor Taylor"' <d-etaylor9clearwire. net>
Subject: RE: Skateboarders at the Gregory
All,
You may want to contact the city and request that the garage door be kept closed 24U. I believe
the correct person may be Ann Builis. You would want to point out that the commercial spaces are
not used by retail customers, but rather by employees who have a gate opener or the code. I
would suggest you make this contact as owner/residents or as a group, rather than me as the
developer. The city tends to be quite sensitive and responsive to individual citizen requests.
Point out that the door used to be closed 24/7 but has been open during business hours for the last
year (6 months?) or so and you have noticed virtually no increase in commercial parking
activity ... assuming that is true. No reason to incur the problem, risk, liability, etc for no public
benefit.
Bob Gregg
From: JudytilaWaicast.ne rmailto:iudytil@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:00 PM
To: edwin hidano
Cc: houston alien; Jerry and Nancy Remy; Dagmar Braun; Sunny Morgan; Ozzie Boyle; Ingrid Wolsk;
Nancy Chin; Dick and Eleanor Taylor; Bob Gregg
Subject: Re: Skateboarders at the Gregory
Thanks for the info. I have not seen these teens in the garage, but it sounds like the
I of 3 4/3/09 11:33 AM
The Gregory is only a semi -secure building at best. The front door is locked and requires a key, code
or fob to enter providing residents and customers with a false sense of security and one can easily
forget this is a public building. This means securing one's belongings, being aware of what is
happening around you and using caution when entering the V floor restrooms. The garage to the
building is open 6 days a week 8 AM to 6 PM with general public access to the stairs and elevator
which in turn provides access to all three floors of the building. The garage in particular has a number
of little private entry ways. to the stairs, elevator and hallways where an individual can squirrel away
and stake out garage activities; Now having had three incidents of inappropriate activities in the
garage residents are concerned about their safety.
j
Reasorbwhy safety and a sense of security is compromised with the Gregotyiunderground parking
garage open during business hours six days a week.
1) Two incidents -of trespassers (non-residents/guests or employee/customers) using the entry ramp
and concrete floor e thg garage_�v le they
-Aa-tv,
2) Theft of a resident's older during night hours.
3) Eight older resident's who live alone and no longer feel safe in the garage due to:
-Lack of cell pho= coycrage in various parts of the garage. No security cameras and no funds
for -such at this time.
-The fact that during the winter months it is dark at 4:30 PM and the gate is still open for any
one to come in.
Impact to Business
Currently only employees of busiaesseajjj������ ... these folks have
fobs for opening the garage door. In the current economy there is plenty of on -street parking
for local businesses and customers appear to prefer quick access to businesses.
Even if access to floors two and three were addressed with locked doors and/or a key code, the
open garage leaves Gregory residents and employees vulnerable to inappropriate behavior.
Fwd: Skateboarders at the Gregory
> the license plate. Both times the kids were here around 5:30 PIVI. I
> called the Edmonds police non -emergency number to report, but they're
> closed until tomorrow morning.
> Stan and Sally
Rediscover Hotmail@: Get e-mail storage that grows with you. Check it out.
3 of 3 4/3/09 11:33 AM
CITY OF EDMONDS - 1215" AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020
PHONE: 425.771.0220 - FAX: 425.771.0221 - WEB: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
14 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING - BUILDING
April 22, 2009
Houston Allen
houtek@earthlink.net
RE: PROPOSED GARAGE DOOR CLOSURE AT THE GREGORY (505 5TH AVENUE S)
Dear Mr. Allen:
You recently inquired with the Development Services Department about permanently closing the
Gregory's garage door off Walnut Street to restrict access to the building's underground parking
area due to safety concerns. As you are aware, the Gregory is a mixed -use structure that includes
not only residential units such as yours but also office and commercial uses. In your materials,
you indicated that residents and employees of the businesses in the building have remote -
controlled 24/7 access to the garage. However, by closing off the parking area, customers would
no longer have access to the off-street parking spaces originally approved for the commercial
uses at the site. This would run counter to the stated purposes of Chapter 17.50 — Off -Street
Parking Regulations:
17.50.000 Purposes.
The purposes of this chapter are:
A. To reduce street congestion and avoid crowding of on -street parking space;
B. To require adequate landscaping of off-street parking areas;
C. To protect adjacent property from the impact of a use with inadequate off-street
parking.
As a result, because all of the required off-street parking for the structure is located in the
parking garage (including the required handicapped stalls), the garage must remain open during
business hours to be available for customers of the businesses.
Sincerely,
Mike Clugston, AICP
Planner
Cc: Street File
E D'i
.1�k -
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5hAvenue North Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 - Web: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICEs DEPARTMENT: PLANNING DivisioN
ADMINISTRATivE DESIGN REviEw
-STA'FFDECISION-
BLD20120119 Project Proposal
The Foundation for Internat * ional Services (FIS) has submitted an application for a sign on the face of the
existing balcony above the entrance to Suite 10 1 1 at 505 5th Avenue South. The sign will not be internally
illuminated.
Property Owner
Jack Hoover
Gregg Production Assoc, Inc.
51 W Dayton St., Suite 204
Edmonds, WA 98020
Design Review Process
Tenant
Foundation for
International Services
Applican
Russell Sign Co.
21104 70'h Ave. W
Edmonds, WA 98026
Design review for signs is considered a Type I decision subject to the requirements of ECDC 20.01.003.
Because the sign is located in the BD-2 zone, the general criteria found in the sign code (Chapter 20.60
ECDC) and the Comprehensive Plan apply.
Analysis
1 Design Standards. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site as Downtown/Waterfront Activity
Center — Downtown Mixed Commercial. The proposed signage satisfies the intent of the following
goals and policies from the Comprehensive Plan:
-a. Downtown Design Objectives are found'on pages 56 — 60 and are intended to encourage high
quality, well designed projects to be developed in- the downtown waterfront area that reflect the
values of the citizens of Edmonds.
b. "Provide clear signage to identify each distinctproperty or business and to improve orientation
and way -finding downtown. " (page 5 8)
c. "Minimize distractionfrom the overuse of advertisement elements." (page 58)
d. "Signage and other way -finding methods should be employed to assist. citizens and visitors in
finding businesses and services. " (page 5 8)
2. Sign bTe. The I proposed sign does not fit neatly into the sign types identified in ECDC 20.60.
Because of where it is proposed to be mounted (on the face of the balcony above the commercial
tenant's entrance), it is somewhat of a cross between a "projecting sign" and a "wall sign". However,
because the sign is to be.mounted parallel and nearly flush with the face of the balcony above, it is
considered to be most like a wall sign. Wall signs (and projecting signs) are permitted in all districts
according to ECDC 20.60.020.L.
3. Number of signs. According to ECDC 20.60.025.A.4, a maximum of three co mmercial signs may be
installed at the subject location, excluding window signs. This one sign will be the only signage for
the tenant at this time.
STREP[ FILE
:T
Page I of2
File No. BLD20120119
FIS sign
4. Sian size. According to ECDC 20.60.025.A.2, the maximum total permanent sign area for uses in the
BD zones is one square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of wall containing the main public
entrance to the primary building. The tenant space is 22 feet wide along 5h Avenue, so 22 square feet
of signage is available for the tenant.
According to ECDC 20.60.030.A, the maximum area for a wall sign in the BD zones is I square foot
per lineal foot of attached wall. The proposed sign is 21.88 square feet and so satisfies code
requirements for size.
5. Sign height and location. According to ECDC 20.60.030.B, the maximum height -for a wall sign in
the BD zones is 14 feet or the height of the face of the building on which the sign is located. In this
case, the sign on the face of the balcony will be approximately 12.5 feet high.
6. Colors. The aluminum panel sign will use green and red lettering with a logo on a white background.
Decision
Based on the facts and conclusions of this report, staff finds that the design review for this project (File
No. BLD20120119) is APPROVED.
I have reviewed the application for compliance with the Edmonds Community Development Code.
Z- /I L-1 / I? —
Mike Clugston, Plafffiing Division
Appeals: Design review decisions by staff are only appealable to the extent that the applicable building
permit or development approval,is an appealable decision under the provisions of the ECDC. Design
review by staff is not in itself an appealable decision.
Page 2 of2 ,
PLANNING DATA STREET=FILE
-- Signs --
Name: AV
Date: I Z tl 3 /0'-?
Site Address:
V'J'- '13
Plan Check #: BLD-200
Project Description:
Reduced Site Plan Provided:
NO)
Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan Designation: a, 6"J-'r(rJ'*-
rV4q
Map Page:
—�Corner
Lot: NO)
Flag Lot: (YES 10)
ADB File # (or date waived):
TOTAL Area per Typeof
Type of Sign
Allowed in
zone'2
Matrix
conditions
met?
Allowed
area per
unit .,
Unit
TOTAL sign
area
allowed for
this siqn
P - roposed
sign area
Example
w311 wlInteinal
1111ummation
Yes, with
condIfions
Yes
I sq. It.11kneal
ft. attached
wall
41 ff. attached
Wd//
41 squdre feet
20 square feet
Sign #1
Nvol
S
V
A0
3-2
Sign #2
Sign #3
TO TA L Sign A rea for Tenan�ISMe
Max Permitted:
Previous Total:
�Proposed Total:
Hei
dht
Sign Type: it-ej �J
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
5ign Lighting,
Sign Type:
Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
Sign Type:
Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
i�/
PLANNING DATA STREET FILE
-- Signs
Si
yn COIM5
Proposed: (,Ow\,r--
Acceptable?
Requires ADB Approval? /V'O
Sign L&cation
If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a fence) meets setbacks? yes
Required Setback5
Street:
Side:
Side:
Rear:
Actual Setback5
Street:
Side:
Side:
Rear:
I.Lqq!t �ain fAr?���� SIgns
Aba V
Size: ( /,
q ' 6tz 5t --o 16 � 4C
Location:
Critical Areas Determination #: col- qq3 0 t V
Study.Required
O&aiver
Other
df-
af- �q C)I"— <- tw[C-e-
0 W -e VQf r
7
-K4� ddr f7jin 6LI /41 1&�15
(10 �oJ rej, u —fo 5P t C NA U r,rt
Plan Review By: //* -
01F E DAr
JAN 2 2 2013
City of Edmonds
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CqUNIgR
Traffic' Impact Analysis WorKS eet
OTM
Q 1 ME
T Mt.
Project:
S
e�br\c'."s
Name of Proposed
�01
Owner/Applicant
Applicant Contact Person:
J:��54_- SCL)rCc, LL-C—
Name
Name
2:2_-Oi� PL 5L-D
PL
Street/Mailing Address-
G6PCQ2!2b LA:)(� q,302D
Street/Mailing Ad , dress
66 ry�6 S.
city State - Zip
city State Zip
Telephone- _25D�� ClCrl' _��3401
Telephone: 24D(-, c:)o-, T-34,i
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable):
Firm Name
Contact Name
Telephone:
E-mail:
THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
Pr2ject Traffic Levels
Sections to Complete
1. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated
I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist)
Il. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated
All sections
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a. Location -Street address: 505; 1546- AyW
ttach a vicinity map and site plan.)
b. Specify existing land use: S
c. Specify proposed type and size of development: CA66,J��. � 69-7 -(:;6
of residential units andlor squarefootage of building)
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysisl Worksheet Page I of 5
(I
d. Date construction will begin and be completed:
A 0 Sb
e. Define proposed access locations: J��rVA Q4 C6( a i!,:, e
% - (—) QJ U
f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations:
2. TRIP GENERATION
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic
PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer)
a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour
Trips
IN
OUT
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT).
PM Peak -Hour Trips,
IN
OUT
c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
r
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips:
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5
3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assigm-nents. For
developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require
trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model. 1
4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met p er AASHTO requirements?
b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis:
Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City ofEdmonds Traffic Engineer
Existing Conditions.
LOS
Delays
Year of Opening
LOS
Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of
LOS
Delays
Land Use
c. Describechannelization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths):
50%
95%
Existing Conditions
Year of Opening
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident history 2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
' Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department
2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact,4nalysis Worksheet Page i of 5
5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.
a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years
after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS
a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments I must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
LOS
LOS
Existing Conditions
Existing
Delays
Year of Opening
With Project
Without Project
Five Years Beyond Change o
Land Use-
With Project
I
Without Project
b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
' A list of pla nned developments are available at the City upon request for public records
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5
7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic
impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached)
and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations
in kDC,18.82.130.
CHANGE IN USE
Fee forprior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the
previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04),
the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. �
ITE Land Use Category
Per Unit
Fee Rate
New Use
-Spmmeti�ss
0, CJ-5
$
Prior Use
8 N —
I Ml=r- -4 (
X
X
Units in
square feet,
of dwelling,
vfp, etc.
/ Fee
New Use Fee: $ -7 5. Oil Prior Use Fee: $ k4-76 LS -16,;)-
El NEW DEVELOPMENT
New Use
El OTHER
ITE Land Use Category
ME
Units in
Per Unit square feet,
Fee Rate of dwelling,
vfp, etc.
X
MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION:
S
INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+ consultant fee)
TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE.
$
City of Eqw'onds, Engineering Division Approval
'hk113
Date
No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative.
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5
REVISED PLAN APPROVED
CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION
PLANS EXAMINER
DATE 17-
GCF-�o
—3— AT
A?. 6 LOW CO"UNTER, N
T-w— A
KE= SOFFIT
Z. FR IT Do"
NOTIIAPEDE OPERATION
IT AS OF EfIST FIRE DOOR
I- AT.00-01
um OOM SOFFIT
k, 17 A
OF—TICE I - SOFFIT Asm
Is I I D9 I DUST. LOSS' STORAGE
7
A7.W
ALIGN 'T. PANEL
PICEJ
I VRRIDOR
STORAGE
TOR
V2 I
V-7314' 4WTC I
4 ilk
ELECT. P�' '.71
7 . . . . . . .
AA, rALM 10?r!P
N00,
-UerLW.A6 FW14'
MD" c us
If —m 11 /� I I CORRIDOR �\ A I 1-1\ I 01mr-hW4
O—FFICE 4
TOM am m
OFFICE 5
JACK HOOVER
TENANT
E. IMPROVEMENTS
JL -L -L -L -JL -L -L -L
FLOOR PLAN
P—h S41
10.11.2011
f i
S"T FRAMING
CIZ) SOFFIT A101E
0
T-v r-r
C-0.
C,
57 NEWCOLLIMINN
2
A
G.0) NEINIOLA�11N
17-gur
EXIT TO
SIDEWALK
OFFICE I
FTWI
4 SHWASHiR
I I' m, t- (��- -r DI-4
L --- —=Kl—
. em"
2WI.76P�AwWSU 210
tgba Ed.-&WA98026
ff%jTY
Page I of I
Bjorback, Leif
From: Steve Butterfield [SButterfield@TGBArchitects.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 2:03 PM
To: Bjorback, Leif
Cc: Todd Brunner (todd@brunnerconstruction.com); Steve Butterfield
Subject: Jach Hoover TI / proposed revision
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Leif,
Please see the attachment for a proposed revision at the community room corridor door; for your
review and approval.
Thanks.
Steve Butterfield
tgba I architects
21911 76th Ave W. Suite 210, Edmonds, WA 98026
t: 425.778.1530 f: 425.774.7803
1/4/2012
Ctt? of (1b oub
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
4:trtt'Fft'F te of (9tam An(T
PER International Building Code Section 110
Occupancy established by this certificate:
K
Dwelling Units: N/A
Type. tonstruction: VA
Maximum Occupant Load -31 _ (Per IBC 1004)
Room capacity signs, whe n required, must remain posted at all times.
No. Stories: 1
Basement: N/A
Owner of Building: GPA, Inc. Addr'e' ssIT e n a n t Sr p a c e: 505 _ 51th Ave S #102
THE Doice La Belle HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006
EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUIL67ING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY FOR THE GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE USE
FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED.
th
Issued this — 12 day of— June,2008
BY: CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL S-1 REET FIL
This certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or obscured and shall be maintained in legible condition at all times. Anychange of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new
Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official.
4k A
W&A 1, .. I I , A 10
liw�wsa assesses Sol I
R(1) (1) d) fl) (T) (1) (T) (h (h (b (1) (b (b (b (T) (1) (1) (b (b (b (b (T) (T)
,M,. uf—*
0
RETURN ADDRESS:
City of Edmonds, Building Division
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
CONFORMED COPY
200704110737 2 PGS
04/11/2007 4:31r N3.00
SNOHOMISH COUNT ASHINGTON
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
TRASH & RECYCLE STAGING AREA
Reference #: Buildinp, Permit #2005-0258
Grantor(s) & Burdened Party: 5 1h Avenue Development LLC
Grantee(s) & Benefited Party: City of Edmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): See 2 4 Twij 27 _Rng_..�
__Qtr SW
OR Lot 1-2-3-4 Block 124 D-00 Plat City of Edmonds
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 00434212400100 — (2)
Assessor's Tax Parcel 1D# not yet assigned
WHEREAS, Fifth Avenue Development LLC are the
owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit:
Burdened Estate Property Address: 505 Fifth Avenue South, Edmonds
Burdened Estate Legal Description : City of Edmonds Blk 124 D-00 — Lots 1-2-3-4
WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of utilizing an exterior trash and recycle
staging area on the northeast corner of the property as approved by the City's Architectural
Design Board, Recycling Coordinator, and Sound Disposal upon said premises and are agreeable
to imposing a restrictive covenant in order for the City to approve such a condition and whereas,
the City is concerned that future owners understand the trash enclosure and recycling staging
conditions in -approving such an exterior staging area design, the following covenant is established.
WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do
hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -
wit:
That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have chosen. to utilize an
exterior trash and recycling staging area design for the northeast corner of the property, and that
the referenced staging area shall not be used daily but only on designated garbage/recycling pick-
up days as determined by Sound Disposal. On all other days of the week garbage and recycling
debris shall be kept and contained in the designated trash and recycling area in the basement of
the building. Current and future owners shall adhere to the approved plans for the subject
building on file with the City of Edmonds and no changes to the interior or exterior trash
STREET FILE
RETURN ADDRESS:
City of Edmonds, Building Division
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
recycling staging areas shall be made without approval by the City of Edmonds Recycling
Coordinator.
Said Covenant, touching and concerning the land, is intended to run with the land, and shall be
binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, grantees, executors,
administrators, devisees, successors and assigns.
DATED this day of ri 2007
F;F.r* Aventfe Deoclo
LL
GRANTOR
GRANTOR
State of Washington
)ss
County of
4-
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ��7 signed
this instrument, on oath stated that heishr'was authorized to execute the instrumenBWd
(title) of r
acknowledged it as the Z2g!!�
of party on behalf on whom instrimient was executed) to be the free aiid voluntary act of such
party for the uses and purposes mentions in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of 20
Notary Public i"64 for th �toe of Washington.
A7
My commission expires
Appiee
'Ile
#OTARk
PUBLIG
01-
OF wt-S
BELFOR (0)
3826 Woodland Park Avenue N.
Seattle, WA 98103
January 1 91h 2007
Dear Homeowners residing on Holly Drive,
Improvement work has begun on Holly Drive. This includes new curb on the
north side, sidewalk repair on the south side, street repair and landscaping.
,d
Completion of these improvements is scheduled around February 2
During this time, I would along with BELFOR like to thank you in advance for your
patience and apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to visit the job office
located on the comer of Fifth and Walnut Street or you can contact me at
(206) 786-4100.
Sincerely
Steve Gra
2 y
Superintendent
The Gregory Condominiums
0-111, / /
Cc File
Mati 09 2006 8:52AM
HP LASERJET FAX
425-774-8039
to
p. 2
ROVV_
rENE.
(4" NNEEZ
To: Steve Grey
Kurt Daviscourt
From: Gerry LeConte
District Sales Manager
Subject; Gregory Condos
10027 South Tacoma Way
Suite G-3
Tacoma, WA 98499
Tel. 253-606-5969
Fax. 253-588-5636
Please be advised that existing drainage system and sewer has been inspected. We have dctermined that
existing piping for drainage and sewer is serviceable and in working order.
V 011%15
aull-
Gerry Le Conte
District SaIcs Manager
10027 South Taconia Way Suite G-3
Tacoma, WA 98499
Tel. 253-588-3027 cxt 115
Fa.x. 253-588-5636
Cell. 253-606-5969
Elilail. gleconic Cturrsc.com
4:�
ENCROACMIENT PERMIT M J5.-,Q_5_-dQ
BUILDINOTIERMITM wvl�-62TO
RECORDING #:. %VOS� 3�. I-0.
qa q5
-ENCROACHMENT PERAUT APPL ICATION
PROPERTY OWNER NAM:+ I f:"T+jJ(Vt:i,3 tAIE L LL.C-, Phone
PROPERTY OWNER MAKING ADDRESS: W,
U
NAME (for Commercial applications):
BUSINESS -L'Lj LZ
Phone
BUSINESS P NAMOE
ADDRESS OFTUBLIC ENCROACM%IENT:. 11_k�_�4: 571T...
of
�e st�ua4res'.'e' ficroaching upon any. portion of ptiblic space, City n -o way or easement area
shall meet all Code Requirements as set ferth in\&,following ch*tefodif the Edmonds Comimunity
Development Code.
18.70 STREET -USE AND Ei4CROAC PERMITS
PERNEIT- ISSUANCE
An Encroachment Permit may be issued, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, City
Engineer or their respective designee, for permanent structures encroaching upon any 1portion of public
space, City right-of-way or easement area . if the structures are placed in compliance with the above
referenced Code Section and the following criteria are met:
1. It has been concluded that the -proposal will not adversely impact public space opena to velhicular or
pedestrian travel;
ard,4 9 hits b or
2. Ar tectural Design Bo prp�v eengrantpd thr- 68� has eri
b� :'adin6nistratrly
appr6�
3. The proposal will not unreasonably interfiiwith the rikhti'ofi� el public; and
4. The proposal benefits the public interest, safety pr- convemencm
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ENCROACHMENT: (micilude total square footage of�encroachment and'gi y"
e
specific lociatibii suckas, 5'west of face of 6rb and-10'south of cAof driveway entrance)
A"
SAEngr\Forms\Encroachment Applicati.on.doc Revised 2/6/04
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
NO.M. 2,,he' 14s'suidince Of this fiermit is 4h derslood by the applicant to be of a temporary.niatu '. revocable by
rol
the Cityper ECDC 18.70.040 and that no vested right is granted.
MgMNITY: 21e applicant understands and by MAO s!`gnature to this a h
pp ication,-agrees to hold the
City ofEdmonds harmlessftom any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, -
foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made akiainst the appli . cant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its
departments or employees, including but not limited to the.defense of any legalproceedings including
defense costs, court costs,, a hd attorneyfeeq by reason ofgranting this permit. In addition, the applicant
understands thal t helshe shalipr6�vid� � - a''nd.co"ratinually maintain during Me term of ihe'permit a'certiflcqe
of insurance naming the cit
y a,s an additionat insured, with respect to liability, andproviding that it shall
be primd6 as to any biherpo 6
licy f insurance
CODE APPLICATION. ..,By signing the application below the qpplicant warrants.that.s1he has read.or had
the opportunity to ?rad Chapter 18.70, of the Edmonds Comhlwiity Development Code and s1he
understands that all terms of the adopted ord-linahice are hicor orated. herein as if setforth infidl and this
p.
application andpermits therefore are subject to the terms of those Chapters.
.SIGNATURE DATE
-Property Owimer
******* DEPARTMENT APPROVALS ***** FOR CITY USE ONLY *****,**
Planning Division Approved by: ADB#1
Remarks:
Public Works Approved by:
Remarks:
Engineering Division A
Remarks:'
. . i I I * * * * * * *
Certiflcate of Insurance verified
M�M I ��
Date
Encroachment Agreement sent to City -Clerk for recording: ;Date Was —
Receipt No: ZAM - 'W4Z4'-- XT(A-61 At 612112-0VS— Aib(� - i� 1q5'e6[VG-Q 'AIW03
Issued By: i Issue.Date:
SAEngr\Fonns\Encroachment Application.doc Revised 2/6/04
0
0
00?40W* 14 qq.00'
26 V 23
�S �2.
5th. AVE. 5.
10
0
N 00*40W* A q4.00'
26 23
A 24
5th. AVE. 5.
FROF05ED MIXED USE ENJILDIN
A CONDOMINIUMIOFFICE EVILDINr,�,
IrA
N 00'=4-1"Pt 10q.60'
b
SITE FLAN
----------
When recorded mail to:
City Clerk
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
STREET FILE
200503210909 12 PGS
03-21-2005 04:28pm $30.00
SNOHOMISH COUNTY . WASHINGTON
SPACE ABOVE THE LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Applicant:
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
This ENCROACBIAENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement') is vtered into between the
CITY OF EDMONDS ("City') and F1 F7;4 L-L-C—
(--Owner[s]'), in accordance with Chapter 18-70. of the Edmonds Community Development
Code. 0--WA#W— &/-e
,j
Z-e�q a-/ - SQS,- -7--3�74, P,—:?
.1. The Prope . Owner is the owner of that certain real property located at
V3 I ( *WZ5 C5-( s- cF�f�A-ic-- 0 0 , --, within the City of Edmonds,
Washington, Assessor's Parcel NumberWINA - I;k4- 01 - W. .2 5 2.-7o 2�- 6-na- n-71a-
and more particularly described as follows cR 57 A--�l -M5- ObA - 1 -10 - G-X.23 -7
-RAX L OT 0 0 e-�� `�Mzrti enm�%, wq - Haug. LA-&�
(A)#q or
as described in Ex] bit "A" attached heit-to and incorporated herein by reference.
2. The Easement. The City night -of -way adjacent to owner's property or an
existing easement used for (strike those that don't apply���,�,�,*
ter- starmladwr
3. The Encroachment. The City hereby, covenants and agrees and grants its,
.ion to Owner to allow 5H-nf74Q(y-5 �1�, A4t=- 7RV— LL I I
c4zAtl� (,41 ATrAC4+Ai,,rr k-:� e=--z W-q' ib',, (1 (- -" .
to remain in a portion of the City right-of-way/easement. A partial site plan, scaled 1'�--2 0',
showing the location of the encroachment is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated I by
reference. This Agreement is subject to the'following terms and.conditions
-1of3-
a. The encroachment shall be installed and maintained in a safe and
sanitary condition at the sole cost risk, and responsibility of the owner and its successors in
interest.
b. The Owner shall agree at all times to indemnify azid hold -the City free
and harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, damages or expenses resulting from
the construction, maintenance, use, repair or removal ofthe -structure installed hereunder,
including any loss, damage or expense arising out of (1) loss or damages to property and. (2)
injury to or death of persons.
. C. The Owner must remove or relocate any part of the encroachment
Within ten (10) days or such other time as specified in the notice after receipt of it from the
City Engineer, or the City Engineer may cause such work to be done and the reasonable cost
thereof shall constitute a lien upon the property.
. d. Whatever rights and obligations were acquired by the. City with respect
to the easement shall remain and. continue in full force and effect. and shall in no way be
affected by City's grant of permission to construct and maintain the encroachrnent structure
e. The property owner is required to provide and continually maintain
during the tem of the permit a certificate of insurance naming the'City as an additional
insured, with respect to liability, andproviding that it shall be primary as to any other policy
of insurance. A copy of the insurance certificate shall be provided to the City at the be g
of each calendar year, no later than the 21r't day of January.
4. Entire Agreemen . This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other
ag . reements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter.
5. Notices. Any notice which is required or may be given. pursuant to this
Agreement shall -be sent in writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid,
registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by other comparable commercial
means and addressed as follows:
ILto the City. &to the Owner. -
City Engineer PE-4 AV �E-Lbpmw�r U-0,
City of Edmonds r5I W, > TE .3 OLI
_6:�M&j 5TJ Z)L'o
121 Fifffi.Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
which addresses may be changed from time to time by providing notice to the other part in,
Yin.
the manner described above.
-2 of 3 -
6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner shall
not constitute a waiver of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or
render unnecessary City's consent for approval, to any subsequent act.by Owner. Any waiver
by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any'other default
concerning the same or any other provision of the Agreement.
7. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns.
Owner agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to the
property, but any failure to do so does not invalidate this provision.
8. Capacity. Each party represents, that the person(s) executing this Agreement
on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s)
thereby bind such party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this
day of 20o'-
OWNER(S)-.
By By:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
I This day, personally appeared before me, Ko ?je-MT- I - Z± KELS747 3
to me known.to be the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing doctiment and that
(helshelthey) HZ- signed the same as (hislherltheir) /Ji 5 free and voluntary act
and deed for -the uses. and purposes therein mentioned.
F-blic
Notary u
Typed or Printed Name
X My Commission expires: 0 go /0
oil
CITY
Bl� y:
ENGINEERING DIVISION\
-3 of3 -
a I
0 . 0
EXHIBIT "Aff
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER: 252703-2-076-0002 004342-124-001-00
252703-2-170-0007
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Those portions of Sections 25, Township 27,
Range 3 located in Snohomish County
Washington and being more particularly
described as follows:
RT 9, beginning at the northwest quarter
corner of said section: thence east 220 feet:
thence South 99 feet: thence west 220 feet:
thence north 99 feet to the point of beginning.
Less the east 73 feet there of.
Together with:
The east 61 feet of the west 208 feet of the
north 99 feet of the northwest quarter of the
northwest quarter of said section 25.
LOT AREA: 30,393 S.F.
0 1 0
ENCROACHMENT PLAN
SCALE: P = 10'-0"
LE6END:
ENCROACHMENT AREA "All:
ENCROACHMENT AREA "EY:
PROPOSED BUILDIN&:
A. ENCROACHMENT AREA TO INCLUDE:
- BALCON)O'DECKS ABOVE 51-011
- TRELLIS 5TRUCTURE ABOVE. b'-O"
- FOUNDATION 5HORIN&
B. ENCROACHMENT AREA TO INCLUDE:
- FOUNDATION SHORIN&
EXHIBIT B-1
SCALE: I " = 20'-0"
r
m
9
m
x
2:
ul
-i
Ul
PLANTER
ru
W
N bcIO54'101" E 55.10'
HOLLY
L-r-
N &qc
0
ROP05ED MIXED U5E BUILDIN65
,�/,A CONDOMINIUM/OfTICE BUILDIN(5�/�//
Ck
N 00022'4'1" A 10cl.50'
EXHIE31T 5-3,
50ALE: I" = 20'-0"
26+23
25 24
EXHIBIT B-4
SCALE: I " = 20'-0"
STIRwr
Sth. AVE. s.
EXHIBIT 5-5
50ALE: I " = 20'-0"
aM PILE 4'-Om BELOA
FINISH 6RADE AFTER
LEVEL I P.T. SLAB
15 STRESSED
FILL VOIDS BEHIND
KALL M/
DRAININEP SRAVEL
4x12 " TREATED
Til LA66INS W
1/4' 6AP STINK EAC44
PIECE OF LA66INS.
CHIP COW�. AS RW'D
TO INSTALL.
SOO PSI LEAN CONC.
ABOVE EXCAVATION
LINE
SOLDIER PILE SIZE a
SPACINS PER PLAN
AND SCHEDULE
VARIES
15" MAX.
-4
A
.4
4
A
�1,
m
Is
t
PROPERTY LDE
CONC. KALL 50 FOUNDATION PLAN
P.T. SLAB, REFER TO STRAZT1,1RAL
COW,. KALL SEE FOUNDATION PLAN
-CoOVER
LA66INS 4 VRAINA6E
MATTINS W 10 MIL VAPOR BARPJER
BEFORE APPLICATION OF CONC.
MIRADRAIN 6000 VRAINA6E
MATTINS FULL HE16W 4 YlIDTH
CanERED BETPEEN PILES,
INSTALLED W FABRIC TO LAS&INS
(2)-5/4'0 x 6' K!LDED HEADED
STUDS o 121 O.C.
(4)-21# HOLES o DRAINA&E
MATTINS BETKEEN PILES
CONC. SLAB W REINF. 4 SUBSRAVE
PER FOUNDATION PLAN
10 MINUS &RAYM
EXCAV. LINE
CAISSON PER SCHED
VV 500 P51 CONCRETE
BELOVII EXCAVATION- LINE
L J,
;4.
SECTION a 5HORINC-7
EXHIBIT 5-6
50ALE: NOT TO 50ALP
4'0 PVC, PIPE VV 60 OF
V MINUS 6RAVEL ALL
AROUND 104RAPPED IN
NON44OVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC 4 C40NNWTED TO
FOarINS DRAIN SYSTEM
PRE -MANUFACTURED
GUARDRAIL 0 42" A.F.F.
DE-516NED 50 A 40 SPHERE
CANNOT PASS THROUGH AT
ANY POINT. INSTALLED PER
MANUFACTURERS SPECS.
MIN. 81-0
ABOVE
CITY ROI
21 CONT. SCREENEDI I
VENT W SOFFIT MATERIAL
PER FINISH SCHEDULE.
FRAME PER
STRUCTURAL.
5 -IDIN& GLASS DOOR
F -9;t AINDOA SCHEDULE
SECTION 9 DECK5 ABOVE
50ALE: 1/2" = P-0-1
EXHIE31T E3-7
SCALE: III = :201-011
0
EXHIBIT ISCIP
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLI CATION
505 5TH Ave. South Building
Proposed Allowances
Shoring —
5th Ave, Holly Lane, Walnut St.
No more than 18" onto City right-of-way
Decks —
5th Ave, Holly Lane, Walnut St.
No more than 18" over City right-of-way
8' above City sidewalk
Trellis —
5th Ave, Holly Lane, Walnut St.
No more than 18" over City right-of-way
8' above City sidewalk
"? '. 1 S 0)
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
May 13 1h 2009
MEMO TO:
Edmonds School District
Verizon Northwest
SNOCOM Police and Fire Dispatch
SNOPAC
Snohomish County E911
U.S. Post Office
Snohomish County Assessor's Office
Snohomish County Information Services
Snohomish County P.U.D.
Puget Sound Energy
Edmonds Fire Department
Edmonds Police Department
Edmonds Utility Billing
Edmonds Public Works
Edmonds Building/Street File
Edmonds Address Files
Lynnwood Disposal
Comcast Cable
Waste Management Northwest
Please be advised that the address for The Gregory, a Condominium is incorrect.
The address is listed as 505, 511 and 515 - 5 1h Ave S with the Assessor's office.
The address SHOULD be 505 5h Ave S; there are NO changes to the.sulte numbers. See
attached map pages.
The parcel numbers for this address are: 01070900000100, 01070900000200,
01070900021000,01070900021100,01070900021200,01070900021300,
01070900030800,01070900030900,01070900031000,01070900031100,
01070900031200,01070900031300,01070900010500,01070900010600,
01070900020100,01070900020200,01070900020300,01070900020400,
01070900020500,01070900020600,01070900020700,01070900030100,
01070900030200,01070900030300,01070900030400,01070900030500,
01070900030600,01070900000300,01070900000400,01070900020800,
01070900020900.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact a City of Edmonds Pen -nit
Coordinator at 425-771-0220. Please contact our office if you wish to be removed from
future address change notifications.
Sin erely,
ere
T eresaVmbaugh
Senior Permit Coordinator
Edmonds Building Department
1-VFemp\DS'Fs\M aster Letters\New Address5/13/2009
Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
STH AVE S 7
—7— 5TH-AVE S
m
�n
Dochester
cn
516 Sig
520 Big
Slo
7
524 C) 2� "'
533 0 530 518 514 29 2
528 525 a
639 530 53,
560 S36 540 550 5 1 rugi
563 T L — 520 536 na ..
37 542 541 5 3 35 0
-3-70 iM 1122 a" 560 638
57 15, M 546
545 548 643 535
1. 648 545 540 542
1110 'or 570
555 1 . 5
Sao
AVE S
560
6TPA E 561 565
02 590
so
569 604
ri I
61o,
639
729
003 Sol 624
7--
i,,,A AVE S VE S
AA
6378 635 836 41 625 — Goe 520 638
032 641 900 623
6, 540
629 124
Y 648
640 02 902 618 --- 646
852
521) '57 $a
03
648 904 622 812
7TH AVE S
77H A WE4
905
701 702 701 5 3
02
M 8 3
710 710 111 0 70
714 714
7
06
720
1 720 7 4 710
723 723
720 1
110
729 726 725 720 717 12
0. 723
724 AVE S: Z 727 730 724
721 714
BA S M — 732 m 738 7
730 733 736 731 720 S 731 718
732 �J: 739
PG 738 740 74
3. 73Y 7 3 1 724
7,0 134 718
1 748 5 746 747
I — , 747 1 736 1 7" 741 '121
;G 737 75, '38 74
750 ?SI
i -- . 7". 751 722
-T.' 10 7
T2T irn. 759 760 720 759
712 755
724
8 HAVES
Ay 3
0 --T :6tH E
IL
W
7!.—, 11 Slo
'2
810
ail SIG
4 Ole 821
814
820 821
831 809 822
1 827
AVE S VIEWPL 830 1 830
836 908
718 710 632
Z4 834 840
820
r
844
841 845
951 ago
—.006 SIG
857 402
600 608
810
4L
STRAVE.8
P"L . �3.12
0
fall
STH AVE S
SrH AVE S.
m S 1041
Docheste
C U) Sj 05;
1 520 SIB 5
v 610 520
'n
533 0 524 525
530 29 r.
528 r S25 a 514 530
560 $39 550 51
4 53 "Ine
'31 560 538 5
572 g 1�4.
5 04- 0
582 550 54S
j 580 — 5 65,
Sal
546 550
WE S BT AVE S 561 902 590 585 5 $55
1105 589
S39 816 Is C58
635
=F 62,
A AYE s AAV 630 Soo
. : :: 635
1101 P83 635 53 62.
641
40 641 goo 623 el
E 29
�641 61
6
E loo
648 003�. '004 1
v 2
62
7.TH AVE S
7TH AVE S
704
VE
905 7011
2
706 3) 710
9 1 — I m 71
714
1102 723
BAVES� 727 720
724
�BAVE m c
720
733
11 740 741 732
I Iss.
734 m 31 733
X
p p
730 p
73 0.: 1
_1. �
1 47 734
746 7 738
737 738 747
V 751 750 751 .750
7 760 720 00 sio
8 HAVES
'AVE S
>
ale 021
v 809
AV6�S VIEW PL
835 908 718 710
832
22006
12� Soo
'Y
�OTH AVE
go� 01
gi.
I Ogi I ------ 4 f---, Sig I ni Ti, L�] �7:: P., 9
P.L 12
Big BIB
821 624
5 629 630
520
833 g39
0 639 640
52
48 046
52
5
857 ge.
o
CS 731 7's
V.
i I I I'le
1! 741 720
755 724
901 810 1 w 801 .2 'r
81-1 81-6
.is 820 21 814
823 827 822
e34 640
844
641 845
40
goo 415 405
0
0
I,?? C . so �)
lie
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
April 3, 2007
Bob Gregg
Gregg Productions and Associates
57 West Dayton Suite 304
Edmonds, WA 98020
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
RE: Missing Street Light and the Installation of Decorative Lights at 505 5 1h Ave S.
Dear Bob,
In response to your e-mail with regard to the missing concrete street light on 5'h Ave, we
talked with Public Works and the Parks Department and neither of them removed the
light nor were they given the light by Hammerworks to store.
I talked to Dave Emory of Lightrix, manufacturer of the decorative street lights, today
and asked if a 2'x2'x2' concrete foundation would be a sufficient foundation for the mid -
block decorative lights. Dave said that size of foundation will work but recommended
connecting the foundation to the sidewalk using V2" rebar dowels., By doing this, the
sidewalk will help with the stability of the system. I would suggest 2-12" rebar per side
should suffice.
With regard signal light, we are not aware of any damage to the street light as a result of
the fire and even if it was damaged, repair/replacement should be the responsibility of
your insurance company. The visual damage we noticed was when your subcontractor
hit the pole with his equipment, breaking it at mid joint.
In order to resolve the issue of whether the signal pole can be repaired or replaced, you
need to contact Dave Emory of Lightrix, at 503-297-8888, to determine what the
manufacturer recommends. Whatever his recommendation/decision is, please provide us
a copy of his written determination.
Noel received an e-mail from Dave Emory on the cost for the mid block decorative lights
and they are $2137 each. According to Dave the estimated delivery time is 8-10 weeks.
If this is the direction you still want to take Bob, Public Works will order the 2 lights
once they have received payment from you. As discussed in earlier conversations, we
would not hold up the certificate of occupancy just because the decorative lights are not
installed, but they do have to be on order.
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Citv - Hekinan. JaDan
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
/?Yll I
Engineering Program Manager
Cc: Marie Harrison, Senior Permit Coordinator
Street File
M.-.:ssage 25 15"h Ifyl log Page I of 2
Chrisman, Lyle
From: Ralph W. Allen [rwallen@bridgepm.net]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:45 PM
To: Chrisman, Lyle
Subject: RE: Pedestrian access along 5th Ave
Will do ... thanks for the consideration.
Ralph
From: Chrisman, Lyle [mailto:Chrisman@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:37 AM
To: Ralph W. Allen
Cc: Bowman, Duane; Gebert, David; Graf, Jeannine; McConnell, Jeanie; Hawkins, Jaime; Sibrel, Ed; Miller, Noel;
Kammerer, Jim
Subject: RE: Pedestrian access along 5th Ave
Ralph,
This issue of pedestrian access along 5th Ave was discussed at length before any drawings were submitted and
at that time we asked for a time and phasing schedule of the work so the Mayor could decide whether or not to
allow the sidewalk to be closed during the construction period. We also made suggestions to prioritize your tasks
to minimize the impact of any sidewalk closure. Based on the schedule you provided, the Mayor agreed to allow
the sidewalk to be closed until April 30, 2007, at which time you would be required to erect a pedestrian tunnel for
the duration of the old Milltown renovation.
We have discussed your recent request and our decision has not changed. A pedestrian tunnel must be
operational by May 1, 2007 and remain operational until the completion of the projects. Since the sewer main is
located where the pedestrian tunnel will be, when the time comes for you to connect to the main, the pedestrian
tunnel can be temporarily closed and pedestrian traffic rerouted, as it is now, for a short period of time for your
sewer work. Once the connection is made, the trench shall be immediately backfilled and the area patched so
pedestrian traffic can resume through the tunnel. If additional closures are required, the same process as stated
above will have to be followed.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ralph W. Allen [mailto:rwallen@bridgepm.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 7:12 AM
To: Chrisman, Lyle
Subject: RE:
Thanks Lyle, a question on Old Milltown...
Was wondering if we might push off the pedestrian tunnel until our permit is in place and related
street work is completed. We have at least two activities along 5th, setting the new catch basin and
plugging off the abandoned sewer line that will be done in the location of the pedestrian tunnel.
Given that the neighboring project isn't started yet, may we have some latitude there? circulation
seems to be working fairly well.
Thanks and let me know.
Ralph
4/13/2007
Wassage Page 2 of 2
?
From: Chrisman, Lyle [mailto:Chrisman@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:40 AM
To: Ralph W. Allen
Subject: RE:
Ralph,
I will check out the receipts and let you know.
thanks
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: Ralph W. Allen [mailto:rwallen@bridgepm.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:39 AM
To: Chrisman, Lyle
Cc: rrgregg@comcast.net; Robert Appleby
Subject:
Lyle, Bob has asked me to confirm that we have paid for our water meter costs and permits
associated with the Gregory. The attached is a record of 5th ave associates payments related to
this and associated topics ... It appears that we may be covered? Please. advise.
Thanks,
Ralph
UAMINGIN
DRAINAGE REPORT & CALCULATIONS
FOR:
505 - 5"' A VENUE MIXED USE
EDMONDS, WA 98020
Project No. 2168.20
101h April 2003
DESIGNED BY:
4= - CMM"'
ENGINEERING
250 4" AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 200
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE: (425) 778 - 8500
FAX: (425) 778 - 8500
1-J
PROJCET OVERVIEW:
The project is located at the Southeast comer of 5 1h Avenue and Walnut Street in the City of
Edmonds, Washington. The total site is about 0.70 acres Development on the site will be a new
three story building, with a mix of condominium units on the second and third floors and
retail/office space on the first floor. Parking for the tenants of the building will be in a basement
parking garage which takes access form Walnut Street. See Appendix A.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Currently there is a restaurant, an auto repair shop and single family home located on the site.
The site drains westerly across a grass lawn and parking lot with an average slope of about 5 to 6
percent to 5h Avenue. Currently there is very little or no off site drainage onto this site.
Neighboring properties to the East include a residential condominium building on Walnut Street
and a single-family house on Holly Drive. A mixed Use building exists south on the opposite
side of Holly Drive. Across the street on 5h Avenue is a small commercial retail building, and
restaurant. The north side of Walnut is the 3-story new Mixed Use building.
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS:
The developed site will have a zero lot line mixed use building as described above. Drainage
basins include the roof area, where a majority of the stormwater will be generated, landscaped
planters along 5�h Avenue and Walnut Street, and the landscaped buffer and patio area along the
east property line. Stormwater from these areas will be captured and drained into a large
detention pipe located under the parking slab in the basement. This water will pass through a
flow control structure that will control the flow to the predeveloped 2, 10, and 100 year -event,
see Stormwater Calculations worksheet Summary in Appendix B. After the stormwater has
passed through the flow control it will drain into a pump chamber where it will be pumped to a
catchbasin located in at the comer of Walnut Street and 5h Street at the predeveloped I 00-year
peak release rate, see StormWater Detention Lift Pump Design in Appendix C.
Other quality control requirements as specified in ECDC 81.30.0603 are as follows.
#2: Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems
The existing stormwater currently drains onto 5 th Avenue where it is captured on the street
by existing catch basins and then conveyed in a hard pipe system. After development is
completed stormwater will be released, from the detention tank, into the same existing hard
pipe system.
#3: Source Control of Pollution:
Stormwater being detained is from the roof and landscaped areas, where pollution sources
are not very common. The main source for pollutants may come from some one
inadvertently pouring a pollutant into the grate located in the garage. To try to prevent this
from happening, a stencil with the wording "STORMWATER" "NO DUMPING" will be
stenciled by the grate. Water in the garage area will be captured by floor drains and
pumped to the sanitary sewer by a separate system detailed on the plans.
#4: Runoff Treatment BMPs: Reinforced
The site is discharging directly into a hard piped stormwater system and is less than one
acre, therefore the predeveloped runoff for the 2, 10 and 1 00-year events will be matched as
required by ECDC 18.30.060 (a.). The predeveloped runoff will be calculated using
Second Growth Forest as a predeveloped condition.
#5: Wetlands:
There are no wetlands on -site or down stream from the site, therefore this requirement is
not applicable.
#6: Water Quality Sensitive Areas:
There are no sensitive areas down stream from the site, therefore this requirement is not
applicable.
#7: Off -Site Analysis and Mitigation:
Existing stormwater from this site is captured by catchbasins located on 5 th Avenue where it
is conveyed in a closed system flowing North to the intersection of 5th Avenue and Dayton
Street, west on Dayton to the intersection of Yd Avenue, then south on Yd Avenue to a
manhole just north of Howell Way where it turns west and outlets into Union Oil Marsh
through the Edmonds City Park. This area is also known as Shellabaker Creek
#8: Basin Planning:
The project is located in the Shellabaker Creek Basin.
#9: Operation and Maintenance:
Operation and Maintenance will be the responsibility of the owner.
#10: Financial Liability:
Required performance bonds will be provided as necessary.
Erosion and Sediment Control
The area of the building will be shored and, excavated to a depth of approximately 16 feet
(plus or minus) below existing grade from the lowest point of the site. There will be little
need for any erosion control measures, because the disturbed area will be below existing
grade. Some silt fence may be required along 5 Ih Avenue when the basement is finished
and the construction is above ground. A Filter Fabric fence is shown on the temporary
Erosion Control Plan. Some diversion berms may be needed to keep the stormwater from
the Holly Drive from entering the site; this will bedetennined at the time of construction.
Drainage Outlet Pumps:
The location of the stormwater detention system for this project requires that the metered flow
from the detention system to be pumped. This pump system will be designed as a duplex system
and be sized to handle the 1 00-year overflow event with both pumps on. In the event that there
is a power outage, the system will be allowed to back up into the garage area where it will pool
until power is reinstated or temporary pumps could be installed. The volume of the 100-year
storm is 6970 CF, if the detention system was already full and another 100-year event occurred
this volume would result in 12 to 15 inches of water in the lower north garage area. This would
happen over a 24-hour period, so the residence would have plenty of time to more their cars out
the basement before any major damage occurred. Calculations for the pump system and pump
curves are located in Appendix C of this report.
A "
Appendix A
1. Vicinity Map
2. Soils Map
3. Photos of Site
VICINIT"( V-1-2
NTS
i� - SHEET NUMBER 56
I
(lains ;nset C. sheet 3A) R. 3 E.
KING � COUNTY
z
r,
04
L) r--? S A-�,j
2 KILOMETERS
2 MILES
YOS
Win.
Z_71
LL ",Alakm
------- 4p-
NEI w
%pilrm
"Mal.