515 MAIN ST (2).pdfI
I
I
EDMONDS BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting of May 11, 1970
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.m. in tho Annex Building confer ence
room by Don Finnigan, chairman pro-tem.
Members Present Members Absent
ad at
Dan Finnigan, Chairman pro-tem Sam Ewing, Chairman
Z
Harry Skinner Al Albers
Donald Decker Chief Cooper, ex-officio
0
Wally Slabaugbj ex-officio
BA-2-70 Wade Hampton James III requested permission to use heavy timber
construction for a structural wall.
C:
Wally Slabaugh stated the Code does require 2-hour noncombustible main
M
0
structural members but would like to see this permitted. Also, he stated
0
C
that the Fire Department was in the same opinion and didn't see any harm
K
d to the heaviness of the timbers.
ue
M M
Z
A motion was made by Don Finnigan to accept the appeal ss stated. The
Z
motion was seconded by Donald Decker.
Due to the conditions of the exposure and the size of't he buil
0 -n
Board ruled in favor of the applicant.
-n
BA-3-?O Jack McLellan— not present.
An appeal was made to the Board to allow the use of fire retardant
M M
treated wood in lieu of noncombustible, as required by Code.
0
A r
The Board indicated combustible m9terial was not allowed in Fire Zone #1
(j)
(n
in Via City right-of-way, per Section 1602, 1710 of the Uniform Build ng
or i
M
Z r-
Code.
>
;U
A Mo tion was made by Donald Decker to deny the use of treated shingles.
Reference UBC 1 ?04 and 1+501. The motion was withdrawn.
Z
A ti.on was made by Harry Skinner to accept the use of fire retardant
mo
3:
it
treated wood as a structural frame only, provided that is protected
C/)
b nt6 to meet 1-bour resistance. Reference UBC 1704:and.450i
y requireme
Z
The motion was seconded by Donald Decker.
0
.... . ... .. .
L
avor of the abov
'Tb e,Bnard voted in. f a motion.
Q:�O M
0
M
1,pee—ng�, a n
I
I
I
I
RECEIVED
JUN 8 1971
CIT
June 8, 1971
z
0
Mr. Jim Murphy
City Attorney
City of Edmonds
RE: Mr. Wade James
515 Me in street,
OM
C:
Edmonds, Washin Ston
M 0
0
Dear Jim:
0
Enclosed please find copies of inspections and letters from the
M M
Fire and Building Departments. We have not had compliance on
z
flame spread of shingles used as interior finish in Mr. James,
office. Also enclosed is a copy of the Board of Appeals meeting
of July 29, 1970.
Mr. James has given us the runaround every time we talk to him on.
0 -n
n
this matter, and I feel that action must be taken, as this has
dragged out long enourh.
MM
a
Sincerely,
0 r
0 M
Cl)
j
CD
M 0
z r
4
Al. Mobi
-tz�' .....
.
74
Fire revention inspector
Edmonds Fire Department
AJ/ls
z
41
cc: Building Department
1h,
z
M
FILE NO. BA - 70
CITY or EDMONDS APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS DATE -70
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR VARIANCE FROM BUILDING CODE REC'T N05.='
(Reference: UBC) FEE None
M
APPLICANT: Wade James ADDRESS: 161 Beeson Buildin HONE: 776-6766
OWNER: Wade H. James III ADDRESS: 315 Main Street PHONE,
LOCATION Or PROPERTY (ADDRESS); Main Street,
LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 30, Block D City of Edmonds
z
Use Zone: 'Rr, Fire Zone
Kroll Map No. Type of nstkRin F.-��irej—III - —1ho.
M
C:
VARIANCE REQUESTED: tn allow hea= timber condruction structural wall
M
0
C
X
SPECIFIC PROVISION OF CODE INVOLVED: jectjU_j2Qj__j2Da_=� Table 17- A. Section 200'�
Mm
z
-4
r- -4
x
STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR REQUEST-.
0 -n
'n
M M
0,-
0 M
C 0)
9 co
z
SKETCH: Show below or attach plot plan, showing all dimensions, buildings (existing
and proposed), setbacks, and streets. Include vicinity sketch of the area with
property shaded in per Example shown on reverse side. Indicate North on both.sketches.)
z
3:
z
M
.......... .
EXAMPLE —VidlnitjiSkeich
z
0
R,
c m
m
0
0
mz
0 --4
Z
om
-Tl
MM
0
m
c (13
mo
Zf-
�4 6J f,
f.d
'41 o
n J
J
z
z
OL
0
m
CITY OF EDMONDS
APP ICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM BUILDING CODE Page 2
STATE or WASHINGTO14
as.
- -----
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
applicant for the variance set forth herein,
do swear that I have prepared and read the foregoing statements; that the same are true
and correct; and that I have signed this instrument as a free and voluntary act for the
�purposes set forth herein.
DATED this day of 196
4
N TO before.me this day of 196
SUBSCRIBED AND SWO1
z
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for Snohomish County,
Washington, residing in
M
Record of Findings of Fact by Board of Appeals
M 0
0
00
-4 C
:The Board of Appeals for the City of Edmonds find$ in the case,of Wade
x C
H la es, III rile No. BA-2-70 request for variance from the
ton m
M
M Z
.'�:,'require
nt. T the Building Code as described therein, the following:
C
1- That: Permission be granted to use heavy timber Construction for
F- -4
a structural wall.
0 -n
n
MM
0 M
C Ch
K cr)
M 0
Z
k
2.. ��.Therefore,,on motion by second by D
D- E"Trante
�ja
t a req 3.. N A I subjec�.to the following speci ions:
u4dt for:variance is Akxs&WG d, it
X,
Due t o the.conditions of the expor ure and the size of the building.
z
z
0
Si Decision shall be effective on May
M
Dated
airman, Board of Appeals
DATA
Datelof Application Mav 6, 3_970 Board Members Present at Hearing;
Dan Finnigan
Date of Hearing May 11, 197:0 Harry Skinner
h
Donald Decker
M
Time of Hearing_�_ Wally Slabaugh
7:30 P.M.
Present for Applicant: Wade Hampton James III —
Secretary, Board or Appeals L./
e0j.
NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE
IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
MAP
w
WIN
md
.."I
EDMONDS BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting of July 29, 19?0
The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. in the Annex Building conference
room by ex-officio Wally Slabaugh.
Members Present Members Absent
Don Decker
Z
Don Finnigan
Harry Skinner
0
Jack McLellan
M
Al Albers
Chief Cooper, ex-officic,
V: Wally Slabaugh, ex-ofticio
3:
The first business at hand.w'a to name a new chairman. Don Finnigan made a
a
M
C
M 0
motion to elect Harry Skinner as the new chairman. The motion was seconded
0
0
by Al Albers and was carried.
C
M
BA-4-?o
M Z
1�ade Hampton James III requested permission to use wood shingles on the interior
Z
of the East and West exterior walls of his new office building at 515 Main Street.
The building is located in Fire Zone I which requires Class III interior finish.
Cedar shingles have no rating. Forest Products laboratory tested cedar in an
0-n
81 Tunnel Test. Each test was lower than they had with redwood. James feels
-n
-sibn an ig er
redwood is a comparable material ... cedar has higher smoke emis d h If
heat contribution ... less than 120 flame spread in most cases.
M M
(n
0 r
James felt he should be given approval with the condition that he provide a
0M
C:
document proving it is less than 225 flame spread.
0)
K Cn
MZ cr-).
Wally Slabaugh said he must have proof that flame spread is below 225 - if it
-A
is not below there.is no way it can be used. Assuming it is a recognized
testing laboratory, be feels the appeal,should be approved.
Al Albers made a motion to approve the use of cedar shingles subject to
Z
James producing test results showing flame spread is below 225, due to the
area involved and only the East and West walls, from 3' above floor to
ceiling in the drafting room only.
Z
Harry Skinner, chairman, stated the motion was open for discussion.
Albers amended his motion to require a minimum of 34" thickness.
M
Motion carried.
Ihe,meeting war. adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
.. .. . .................. .. .... .... ..
UVYVY
Western Wood Products Association
700 YEON BUILOUNG PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 AREA CODE 503 224�3930 TWX: 9M,164-8074 CABLE CODE; WESTWOOD
z
July 16, 1970
a,
�n
0
M
Cc
0
01.
80
C
M M
Mr. Wally Slaybaugh
10
Building Official
City Hall
r- -4
Edmonds, Washington
3:
(j)
Dear Mr. Slaybaugh:
0 -n
n
Mr. W. S. Brown of the Red Cedar Shingle and Handsplit
3:C
MM
Shake Bureau has asked us to furnish information we
0
have available on the flame spread ratings of Western
.0
Red Cedar.
0,
M
C 0)
-1
9 cl)
As the enclosed correspondence and test results indi
Q 0
Z
ate, the accepted rating for Western Red Cedar is
�75 or less.
X
Yours very truly,
3:
z
3:
B. L., Foramim.
Assistant Director
Technical Services
M
BLF:rlh
Enclosure
cc: W. S. Brown
L
RECE111M
JUL 17 1970
CITY OF CONiONDS
BY -
F
AN ORGANIZ-ON OF PRODUCERS
0" DO. AN.CUC"
QUA -1 - A.."G IFEEE ON -ONNQ.
n"
r
FILE
CITY Or EDMONDS APPLICATION TO BOARD Or APPEALS DATE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR VARIANCE FROM BUILDING CODE R C,
(Reference: 1964 UBC) FEE _None
APPLICANT: WLde
jigmpton james III ADDRESS: -315 Main Street PHONE:
OWNER: ggme ADDRESS: PHONE:
LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS): jj Wn S�r
eet
LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 30 Block D City of Edmonds
Use Zone: BC Fire Zone I
Kro3l Map No. Type of Construction Required 111 1 hQAAr
VARIANCE REQUESTED:
the use of cedar shingles on the interior wall%of new building -
SPECIFIC PROVISION or CODE INVOLVED: Section 4203 UBC and Table 42A and 42B
STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR REQUEST -
SKETCH: Show below or attach plot plan, showing all dimensions, buildings (existing
and proposed), setbacks, and streets. Include vicinity sketch of the area with
property shaded in per Example shown on reverse side. Indicate North on both sketches.)
L
L
z
0
M
M
M 0
30
C
M
M
Z
0-4
Oil
n
MM
0
0
M
M 0
z
M
>
;U
z
z
M
r
_�.XAMPLE— Vicinity Sketch
Z
0
lc
t,.,7
—
a
m
c
0
0
0 0
C
3:
m
z
10 4
�x
0 -n
mg
m m
0
0
0 M
C 14
:c cn
0
Z
>
z
3:
z
0,
m
pro
I
N
CITY Or EDMONDS
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM BUILDING CODE Page-2
STATE OF WASHINGTO14
ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
I, the variance set forth herein,
applicant for
do swear that I have prepared and read the foregoing statements; that the same are true
and correct; and that I have signed this instrument as a free and voluntary act for the
purposes set forth herein.
DATED this day of 196
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of 196.
z
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for Snohomish County,
Washington, residing in
M
C
Record of Findings of Fact by Board of Appeals
M 0
0
0
C
9
The Board of Appeals for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of
x M
M z
request for
File No. v7ariance from the
--A
requirements of the Building Coife as descrTibed therein, the following:
1. That:
Cn
0 n
n
M M
0
0 M
C C/)
M 0
z
V'�
Ln
2.,,-Therefore, on motion by second by
the:request for variance' is Denied/Granted, subject t; the following special conditions:
X
z
z
3. Decision shall be effective on
?5
(Date)
M
Dated
-airman,
Eh Board of Appeals
DATA
Date of Application Board Members Present at Hearing:
Data of Hearing
Time of Hearing_
Present for Applicant:
Secretary, Board of Appeals
yE(I�N fill I L11 I N t; it I L A 1) 4, 11 11 E G 11 N
ADDRESS REPLY TO! 7733 S. E. 13TH AVENUE. PORTLAND 2. OREGON
octecor 14, 1963
1,1�. PuA 11
�e a 3 t 0 nl
Al Dincarc, Lu�,�! " I 'Ir Co.
2355 S. 13. 15th
vortlzmd 2, orm_,:�a
-4
0 m
ccariyz�11N�', C'�Ir 0" Cta
-4 0
00
302
tha'. "I
a 111 ;1n"=i0'Z'
z
n �Ia*:!-, qpTe"d vat by teat
75 or 1=3.
';:as t%�a
St; to a IC to ny
no m
0 -n
r r1ot:
Ima to tp
-n
cruawles co -Id D3 =.Iz to Uj ani also 0-,) all pl=:3
I 11h: ba
t"Zoauz"71 hls of'; rIt� t1m mme 0. Ito Fir
m m
o-n no p2=3.
0
a=cpt, 20 f�- ma'a cl= 17.
m
cl)
ar a�l a "L 7a, 1 ara =tcra 1,741to plzm,,
9 (D
Westcan cc-dar, cmd 1:
Im 0
'11 aFter
Tlv3 1""y�"o FiT wa. 0.1c:1.1-ally obt, -ned
op.,:-anJ tcats tam7or-1 !1=1CCU M-,j I-Alito Fir
r-1 thj 7:---- Cry.
z
Yours vcvj twlys
3:
z
B7.raa L. Forc:,=
rms:aavch
M
Lw Becltst-z�-=
RECF!\1!7r)
JUL 17 1970
CITY OF ED"oo"
A*,' 01WANIZATI(IN' (If
�1AN,UFACTUHING OUALITY LUMBER TODAY 611MVINO TBEES FOR 1,010111M,
N
T OF A
FOREST SERVICE
FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY
NLE
R 11 1.
DIRECTOR @ -A-..-. Ii, NI.CONSIN
1959
�4700 (FIR) December 7,
Z
0
0
oto
rp
0
Mr. T. K. May
West Coast Lumbermen's Asso iation
Zlcil
1410 S.W. Morrison Street
Portland 5, Oregon
M
C:
M
0
Dear Tank:
0
flame
Reference is made to your inquiry concerning the relative -spread
M
characteristics of the wood species --hemlock, redwood, and redcedar.
M
We.have tested the surface flame -spread characteristics of these species
C:
> Z
using our 8-foot tunnel furnace. These three species had, for all
in tests.
practical purposes, the same flame -spread performances our
0 -n
The 8-foot�tunnel furnace test used in evaluating the flammability,of
these species is one which has been developed at this Laboratory over a
period of the last 7 years. This method is currently being considered
MM
0
for adoption as a tentative ASTM Standard.
0
M
Very truly yours,
M 0
H. 0. FLEISCHER, Chief
Division of Timber Processing
Z'
z
0
M
;.4
MI-mmcm in the bumin3 of vaelous types of �)d be-i ob5trved for cti.
z
t=e-3. TAth the introduction of the Standrd Test Method for Fire Haxard Cla:-:1fication
of Bulldlm�- 21atcriabj a measurin:r scale has been e3tabnah.-d by which the flamae spread
C!caracurliiiz of vaii= species of ymod can b� couiartd.
Mcm WAo,7inZ table Eivaa the relative fl=e spread cl�iflfications of a n=bcr of
RI
of I inch nocninal solid himber. The values shotn are based on a limited nunT
tzan, and are subject to revision as more data is developed.
Bh.4 Ya-105.110 ftpi� S-tb— Y.U.
X
115 "tPi— P-d—
14S-
M
70. miss
Rd.-d
m
140.
G—, r,.d 17553
W ... ID.
W, Ro W.t— Im
0
0
-"Mi.
Mt.. vf.t— Whits N—b—
C
7S a
Xrzl-. Wbl� 1:0.215 W.L-t 140
t' Zt�A,rd T.t M.*.d f� r1r, R—d d
t
M
..d (,�d ,k 9-1..) IM S� D.. C-4 Ljjj,.
G—U-6,1 .1 (UL.451')'.
tQ
V
Ma 13 �tx of ;—L— pi-, t�xm bd —1— Lme. the sv—� d tt s la Lq,
0 n
Card Data Service 11ndermitcrs',Laborztorits, Inc -
m m
NO. w 52n Fe b= 207 F- Ohio St, Chica;;o 11, W.
ULMI 41957
.1
0 M
C Co
m o
m
>
Z
Z
m
w
',D 'I'D `J
0
SIMPSON R SEARCH CENTER
may 1059
LIBRARY
Z
I P, �711
Rl
d
3:
c m
SIMPSON RESEARCH CENTER
m 00
LIBRARY
LIB
=FP1
0
c
m m
z
S 1 PSO N R E S Alr, E
E- �,,H C T
(n
L Iffe
0
m m
0 r
om
c
z 0
;u
11
z
Z
m
p.
E,
r
Ir
're 7e
.6.,. -wit�L .1 %y;
brec7w
SURFACE FLA11,1ABILITY OF VARIOUS WOOD-W.SE BU11D]IT6 MATERMA
By
H. D. BRUCE, Chemist
and
L. E. DOWNS, Engineer
Forest Products LaboratorA Forest Service
U. S. Department of Agriculture
Z
0
R1
Summary
-R
CO
M
C
surface flammability of 29 species of wood in lumber form and 50 commercially
M
0
produced plywoods, herdboards, fiberboards, and particle boardswas measured
(JO
at the Forest Products Laboratory In the 8-foot -tunnel furnace. Results indi-
C
-4
cate the range in surface flammability that can be expected from the types of
X M
M
lumber and fabricated boards tested.
Z
Introduction
CD
0 -n
Fire pr�qtectlon engineers have long realized that an important property of a
n
buildin material is its surface flammability, or the ease with which flames may
.9
MM
s Methods of measuring surface flammability have been
pread over its surface.
developed but have'not been standardized, and until recently few data were
O'_
Om
published.
C
The Underwriters Laboratories have made, flame -spread measurements on a. variety
Q
Z
of materials including plywood, Douglas -fir lumber and cellulose board coated
with fire -retardant paints, lumber of several species impregnated with fire-
X
retardant chemicals, asbectoa-cement boards, and acoustical tile. They re-
leased the test results in their Fire Protection rqu:Ipment List of 19,57.
Z
Gross and Loftus of the National Bureau of Standards published the paper,
X
"Flame-S ing Finish Materials," in the May 3.958 Bul-
pread Properties of Build:
CO)
letin of the American Society for Testing Materials. This paper gave test re-
Z
sults on 3 base materials, 25 finishes, 12 plastics, and 10 other materials.
J. E..Ferris of the Commonwealth Experimental Building Stationy Australia, in
M
the 19,5,9 paper, "Fire Hazards of Combustible Wallboards," gave flame -spread
data for six types of unpainted wallboard and for a hardboard, fiberboard, and
plywood -finished with a variety of paints and varnishes.
.14aintained at Madison, Wis., in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin.
Report No. 2140
I
I
In this report are preseirbed test data obtained on surface flammability of P-9
species of wood in lumber form and 50 commercially produced plywoods, hardboards,
fiberboards, and particle boards. The res
values
was mad
Test Method to do s
materic
everi
The method of test was that described by Bruce and Miniutti in "Measuring Surface
types
:Flammability," ASTM Bulletin 230. of May 1958, and Forest Products Laboratory
purpos
Report No. 20971 "Small Tunnel Furnace Test for Measuring Surface Fleltmability�
15�57- In this test a specimen 14 inches vide by 8 :Cast long, conditioned to
In. ear
tive h
moisture equilibrium in an atmosphere at 30 percent rela umidity and 80 F.,
tunnel
is laid In the furnace (fig, 1) and weighted down by a heavy cover, with asbestos
materl
millboard directly against its back. The progression of,flame along the under-
provid
side of the specimen is measured and expressed as an index number. Basis for this
materl
index is a rating of 100 for the progression of flame on select red oak flooring'
39 pounds per cubic foot in density and a rating of 0 for progression on asbestos
millboard.
Along with flame -spread rates, smoke density and heat contributed by the test
specimen were also measured and expressed as index numbers relative to red oak
and asbestos, as explained in the reports describing the test method.
Two tests were made on each material, with a third test when the results of the
first two -,,rare not in adequate agreement.
Test Materials
The fiberboards, hardboards, particle boards, and plywoods were obtained largely
through the courtesy of the respective manufacturers' associations.8 All were
specimens of commercial. mill -run production. The sheets were usually 4 by 8 feet
in size. From each 4- by 8-fo6t.sheat,. three test specimens 14 inches ,ride by
8 feet long were out.
The lumber, nominally I inch thick, was obtained from sawmills or retail dealers.
Mien conditioned to moisture equilibrium in 30 percent relative humidity and
80* F., the boards were surf . aced to a thickness of about 3/4 inch, tongued and
groov ed,2 and assembled into panels held together by three nailed cleats on the
back. Pieces shorter than 8 feet were end -squared and butt -joined.
EThe Insulation Board Institute, the Hardboard Association, the Particle Board
Association, the Hardwood Plywood Institute, and the Douglas Fir Plywood
Association.
—'An exception to this method of assembly was made for the redoedari which could
not'be tongued and grooved. The redeedar boards were nailed to a backing of
l/4-inch Douglas -fir plywood to form the test panel.
Rep
Report No. 214o -2-
7
Z
9
1,
0
OM
MO
0
0
C
M
M Z
U)
0
M M
0
0 M
C.
M C.)
Z
Z
-4
M
Z
M
7—
Results
:)f 29
v-dboards,
results of all tests are given in tables I'through 5. The range in index
values found for the several groups of materials is shown in table 6. No attempt
was made to analyze the results to explain the differences in the index values;
to do so would require an intimate Imowledge of the composition of the commercial
materials and research on the effects of various ingredient The torts, how
's.
y that can be expected fxom the
ever, indicate the range in surface flammabilit,
j Surface
'tory
types of lumber and fabricated boards tested, and now available for construction
purposes, as given by the rorest Products Laboratory 8-foot tunnel -furnace test.
ility
Z
to
In earlier tests, close correlation was found between results of the 8-foot
80' V-A
t
tunnel tests and vall-corner tests, which simulate room firesp on 11 different
asbestos
materials. It is believed, therefore, that the results given in this report
ander-
provide a realistic relative measure of the surface flammability of the various
for this
106111*
materials tested.
,�sbestos
M
M a
0
i:
nest
0
C
I
MM
MZ
the�
r -4
0 -n
-n
M M
0
0
are
0 M
C
feet,
"8
b
M
Z 0
ei ers�
;U
lid,
M
>
Z
,and'.
the
Z
M
3 of
Report No. 2140 1-15
z�M
Table 1.--�Results of tunnel -furnace tests on I -inch lumber, (Continued)
Species lie ight :Yloisture:
Index mmbers-1
content:
----- 7 ----------------------
:Flame-:Smoke-
: Heat-
:spread:density: contributed
------- ----------
------------------------------------- --------
:Lb. per
--------
:Percent
------
:cu. ft.
14.Redcedar (Juntperas virginiana) 33:5
9.0
105
212
94
3O.Dou
................. do ............. 34 2
8.8
114
236
94
A
25.Redwood (Sequoia P-5 .9
6.4
120
170
207
64
31.Dolu
................ do ............ 25.2
6.4
122
72
A-
26.0pruca, Sitka (Picea sitchensis 27-0
7-0
L16
: 72
: 77
32.Dolu
................ do .............. 26.6
6.5
108
: 42
: 82
A-
27.sTreetgm (Liquidembar st;Eaciflua 31 2
j
6.4
94
66
: 82
p]
. ......... ....... do .............. 32:4
6.2
: 107
86
: 114
33-Doi
.
. ................ do ................. 33.2
7.2
: 113
52
: 119
A
28.Walnut, black (jqZlans. RLEO 35.6
5.0
105
80
ILI
34.Da
....... do ........... 39-3
5 -2
108-
90
118,
A
29.Yelloir-poplar (Liriodendron 30.9
: 5.7
121
123
1PO
31.2
: 5.7
128
188
130
�33.Do
36.Dc
for board.
to 100 for red oak lumber and 0
asbestos
gBotanical species not determinable, from wood alone.,
37.3N
38.D
39-1)
4o.i
410
Report No. 2140
(Sheet 3 of 3)
Rep,
Z
�n
rn
C
M 0
0
80
C
-4 C I
X M
M Z
r6) --i I
E:
0 -n
,n
A
X
M M
0
0
C M
C CD
M 0
F-
>
Z
CO
z
0
M
I
.11