The URL can be used to link to this page

524 8TH AVE N.PDFiiiiii lill 11 8643 524 8TH AVE N 0 ADDRESS: !:2� eq, -.( Ll Yt'- 'r V TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: �3 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: [] Conditional Waiver [-*� Study Required E] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:/ Ali -7 /f PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: (Me -NM16) SEWER LID FEE $: - LID ft: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) # GEOTECH REPORT DATE] STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: LATEMP\DS1"s\Forms\Street File Cliecklist.doc PE-AG"'I't, A'P`kd1CA+ ION WNER NAME,'NANIE OF BLISiNFS3 ADDRESS SIJITE/APT a A X LMAL oESCn_jPfF0N CHECK 7- susomwON io. L� MAMIAROO.E.s 7�V 7T . TO I Y ZIP PJBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. PSCP a A ROVED BY No = REOUIRED OFOICATION' " Uq�. —WOSED x- FUGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRE Z ADDRESS STREET LISEPERMIT REQUIRED 0 DA SEE Ell REVIEW By ZIP IEPHONF r.q GINEERING MEMO DATED NUMB . 2�`OZZ 127 REMARKS NAME W18a ADDRESS TER SIZE . IBUILDING SUPPLY :IZE JFIX7URE UNITS e CITY ZIP REMARKS STATE LICENSE NUMBER AlZa;,106117�16 A 1W SIGN AREA EW NO.. ENV..REVI Legal Description of Property - Include all easements ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMFJ� 6R (Show below 0;- attaLh two copies) t VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING RE ',A I JDATE 7�tl SETBACKS—F_-ET IGHT LOT CC __' 3i HE VERAGE IL z FRONT IDE VO REAR Tax Accvjnt 3!U;�L- , Parcel No. AEMAR S 4 �2z/;!7 6.3,z:20q c ce 5"r. V ...... NEYV RESIDENTIAL ED I, ."ING ADOfALTCR rOMMERCIAL MECHANICAL --RAE-- 9� % REPAIR APT. SLOG El SIGN F E OF CONSTRUCTION .E. FILL FENCE CMIECKE 4� ve 6 DEAMUSH OR GRACE Ej _F7) (_711� - t; CARPORT ITYP _/y -215'. 11 X 6 SWIM UPANCY - - I * I OCCUFAN REMODEL GARAGE SPECI L INSPECTOR AIIFA occ T POOL EOU SEC, GROUP W*OO STOVE/ Ej RETAINING WALU LOAD INSERT %I ilip ROCKEH� RENEWAL REMARK. (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INGPECTdOP9S PER USC 305 o 'bz"', NUMBER OF STOF013 DWELLING L: A54f, NATUkE OF WORK TO BE DON Z (A7rACM PLOT PLAN) 7 1p: FINAL.INSPECTION REQUIRED VALOATIOM FEE I MAN GMECK FEE BUILDIFIG —]PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL C;Wl This Permit Covers work to be done On private property 6NLY. GRADINGIFILL IN An- construction on the public dOm8ln (curts, sidewpiks, driveways, marquees, EtC.) Will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 160 Days - I.A , Permit Limit: I Y ear - Provided WcrR Is Started Within 180 Days Ej�au-,ax- rclui 7l', ;ntereSt, aprees P) inc!emnify, defend and hold "Applicant. on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs. assigns and successorsin harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for da mages of whatever nature, &rising dirG,,t;y or Indirectly from the Issuance of this P011111t. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT )4>>0 modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance 0 nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance Provision." TOTAL AMOUNT D2L 4 ,y acknowledge that I have read this application; that the I honY ATTENTION 14 riformation given 18 Correct; and that I am the owner, Or the duly APPLICATION APPRO VAL jutriorized Ggent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT 'al ' laws regulaung construction: and In doing the wor'A authorlz- AVTHORIZES This application Is not a permit until the Su!ldlng Official Or his t%rebry, no person will be employed :n violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by WORK NO �ode ol thil State of Washington relating to Workmen's CoMpOnSa. TED Deputy; and foes are paid, and receipt Is �X acknowledged In space provided. IN PECTION ONATURE tOWNEF! 04 AGENT) nATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL' GN URE DATE I . I . : I I - , ,, " " .. - CITY OF t', MO 40- ED --- Z_e) CAL R R DATE FTENTION INSPECTION 5 UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE r_7 - R z. .EUEPHONE NUMBER �11. A FINAL INSPECTION '1771 -3202 HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — lnspecit9 L`_RTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC %P7 ER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assesso iw.g STH AOAE NOM 6 jr,76V2- MWV IN so 6* A4 P.M n� > ME! r-, w C. Ir t3 . a cn > -u 0 x > m Z30 enqr�v, 95, !:, wey.9 vtl-1 yo V(?z Nk w nat�,�szqt Toi6o� neei-fng. A� — 70 ENGINEERING APFROVAL FOP WPUPANCY kk-TO: 09i'm t'C'O ordinato'r I d,i,ng - Di vi s i on m-, e dhr. isman En"d ne erihg'_Inspector DATZ INSPECTED* OBJECT ADDRESS: V-7-� s p liOLDER'i*:* ERMIT, PERMIT,', -�6:, PERAIT APPROVE6.F.9R.FINAL PERMIT N OT APPROVED.FOR Htik SEE -REQUIREMENTS Rp.','q`ui'rements -7 4 . Al Alditicnal.,Commemts:� Y Z-V 1-1-f j RECORD OF INSPECTIONS --7-7 7 WSPECTOR DATEAPPROVED.- 7- �ETBACKS._-* ...... Z :zA7 FOUNDATION: r IJ oo ng.,.. a Vv" A�teirAg 2— G: nd _.-Linderwou Rough-4 n 51 . ................ C V_ _HEATING: Gas Test .................. s AP" Gas Piping ............ y V. Equipment ............ ...... cl............. FRAM;NG ...... jl� SHEETROCK NAILIN2-.�� S; Pik". SPECIAL INS PECTION'... FINAL APPAOVAL FOR O-CUPANCY ....... Ml 4 SIDE SEWER PERMIT CITY OF URMERLE 8 go PERMIT NO 81293 Address of Construction: I . 41 legal Description (Include all easements): —/b da Property L I -or � 2� -5 /i/ ATA42FDS f iz Owner and/or Contractor: 1911�6s e r�,W g�� r 4 State License No. Building Permit No. R(Single Family Invasion into City Right -of -Way: N6 El Yes El Multi -Family (No. of Units—) RW Construction Permit No. O'Commercial Cross other Private Property: PM<O 11 Yes'. Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I certify1&t Vf�av4o`reacl and shall comply with all city requirements Date as indicated on the back of.the Permit Card. CALL DiAL-A-DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION'*. OFFICE USE ONLY, FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT., Permit Fee: 339 Issued By Trunk Charge:— 2-5— Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: 136 Lid No.: Partial Inspection: Comments Reason Rejected: Final Inspection Approved:' Date &40 Date —Initial Date —Initial A PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE` White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector .' Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3/90 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO - -------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS F� LID NO - ------------------ ASMT. NO - ------------------ OWNER------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR --------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS - — -- ----------------- AVA� ------- P3.-D ----------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------ E I -F 0 PWW-0001 -11/75 (REVA 1178) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EOMUNDS ----------- ----- NAME OF ADDITION ------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- TREAl"MENT PLANT -- ------------------------------------- fw c 1AD, Approved: DATE 0 lce-(2- u, wres- �%V-an, --- By ------------------------------------------------------------ I STREW. FILE 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 10 Timber Piles Timber piles should consist of good quality, new treated wood that conform to ASTM D25-70 specifications. We recommend that the timber piles be driven to an allowable bearing load of twenty (20) tons each using the modified ENR formula or another accepted pile - driving f ormula. We should be engaged to inspect timber pile placement to verify they are suitable to support the design loads. Lateral loads for timber piles will vary with the depth of penetration into bearing soil. We should be engaged to provide lateral forces after the final plans are prepared. Slab -on -Grade Floors Pile support will be needed for any proposed slab -on -grade floors if the owner is not willing to accept significant differential settlement. We recommend that the slab be structurally reinforced and not be tied to the wall foundations. The slab may be placed directly onto the free -draining fill material. Interior slabs should be provided with a vapor barrier which is placed on the free -draining fill subgrade. one (1) to two (2) inches of sand may be placed over the fill subgrade to aid in the curing of the concrete. Drainage We recommend placing a perforated, rigid, four (4) inch diameter drain line along the base of all building perimeter foundati.uns and tightlining it to the storm sewer system. The drains should be bedded and backfilled with a minimum of twelve (12) inches of pea gravel - 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 8 report. Any proposed driveways which cross the area of organic soil should be located in an area where the existing uncontrolled fill is located. If the owner is willing to accept the risk of driveway settlement, distress, increased maintenance and the associated repair costs, drivewa . ys may utilize a geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 50OX on the exposed subgrade then placing a minimum of three (3) feet of free draining fill over the fabric. The recommendations regarding site preparation should be followed before the construction of the driveway. The free -draining fill should consist of material which conforms to the gradation given in our site Preparation section. The fill should be placed according to our recommendations given in the same section and compacted to at least 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density. After placing the roadway fill, we recommend leaving the roadway unpaved as long as possible or utilizing 5/8 inch minus crushed rock as the final surface. This will make repairs of initial settlements less expensi ve and much easier. We recommend the subgrade be leveled and recompacted prior to placing the base coarse. We recommend a pavement section consisting of four (4) inches of 5/8 inch minus crushed rock base coarse and two (2) inches of Class B asphaltic concrete. The owner should be aware that settlentent of the proposed driveway should be expected if it is placed over areas of organic soil, and periodic pavement repairs should be anticipated throughout the lifetime of the driveway. The recommendations presented in this CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 7 sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inch 100 #4 25-75 #200 5 maximum based on the fraction pass- ing the #4 sieve. The fill should be placed in loose lifts and mechanically compacted. The first lift should be approximately twenty-f our (24) inches thick and all subsequent lifts should be twelve (12) inches thick. The surface should be graded to drain. We recommend that the portions of the building, driveway and construction access areas which are to be placed over the soft, organic soil be drained of any standing water. All large trees should be removed. The existing vegetation cover should be left in place and covered with the fill material. We recommend against excavating into the peat to avoid ground water. French drains should be installed before the placement of the fill material. Detailed and specific recommendations regarding these drains are outlined in our "Drainage" section. Paved DrivewaVs The organic soil observed underlying the properties is not normally useable as a driveway' subgrade. Unacceptable settlement and distress to the pavement surface would be expected if the roadway were placed on the existing ground surface. In order to reduce driveway settlement and distress, any pavement section should be supported by and designed to span between the piles of a deep foundation as recommended in the Foundation Design section of this 0 0 August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 6 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS The organic soils present on the two (2) lots are apparently saturated throughout the year and standing water is present during the wet season. We therefore recommend performing site preparation and foundation work during the driest period of the summer to minimize excessive costs and construction problems associated with a shallow water table and the thick, very soft organic soil layer. We should be engaged to provide specific and detailed recommendations for any proposed development once more detailed plans have been developed. Site Pre)aration The organic soils were found to be saturated and are very sensitive to disturbance. In order to preserve some bearing capacity for construction equipment and to provide proper drainage, we recommend that at least three (3) feet of a free -draining fill material be placed in the proposed building, driveway and construction access areas. We recommend leaving the uncontrolled fill where it exists otherwise undisturbed. Specific recommendations for fill placement are provided below. Tracked equipment should be used as much as possible and the use of heavy loaded, rubber -tired vehicles should be avoided. The free -draining fill should consist.of 1 1/4 inch minus crushed rock, approved pit run or a granular soil which conforms to the following gradation. August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 5 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL CONCLUSIONS Lots 1 and 2 are underlain by very poor soils and will be dif f icult and expensive to develop. The proposed development is feasible, however, if our recommendations are closely followed. Based on our test pit subsurface exploration, the flat, low-lying ground on the properties is underlain by between seven and one-half (7 1/2) to fourteen (14) feet of very soft organic soil. Uncontrolled fill up to two (2) feet thick mantles the organic soil along the northern and western edges of the parcel. The area not covered with uncontrolled fill is a poorly drained, swampy area that contains species of hydric plants and appears to be wet throughout the year. The organic soils are not suitable for the support of structural loads, such as foundations, slab-on-gra . de floors and pavements if significant differential settlement is to be avoided. The proposed residences will require a deep foundation to limit differential settlement. Detailed and specific recommendations for a deep foundation are presented below. Methane Gas The presence of a thick layer of organic soils may allow a build- up of methane and other gases in spaces under the proposed residences if not properly ventilated. We should be engaged to provide specific and detailed recommendations after the final building plans are prepared. 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 4 dense sand. The sand grades into a mottled light brown and dense sand with trace gravel and cobbles. All of the test pits were terminated within the medium dense to dense sand at depths of between twelve (12) and seventeen (17) feet below the surface. The property has been mapped within an area of Vashon advance outwash as shown on the "Geologic Map of the Edmonds Quadrangle" (USGS Map MF-1541, Minard, 1983). The Vashon advance outwash is defined as clean, pebbly sand which was deposited by meltwater flowing from the advancing front of the glacier. The sand found underlying the organic soils is consistent with this classification. Ground Water We observed the subsurface hydrologic system through test pits only. The observations and conclusions provided here are genera,l, and may not reflect all aspects of the subsurface water flow. Weak ground water seepage was encountered throughout the saturated organic soils. Moderate to heavy ground water seepage was found in the sand underlying the organic soil. The ground water seepage found in the test pits indicates that the ground water table is nearly level with the ground surface. The ground water level is not known for different periods of the year; however, based on our observations made during our soil exploration of the property to the south on June 22, 1990, the level may be at a higher level during the wet season. AJ SCHROEDER SHORT PLAT SOUTH OF ALOHA PLACE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 9008-16G TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope Page 1 Project Description Page 2 Site Description Page 2 Subsurface Soil and Ground Water Conditions Page 3 Soil Conditions Page 3 Ground Water Page 4 Conclusions Page 5 Methane Gas Page 5 Recommendations Page 6 Site Preparation Page 6 Paved Driveways Page 7 Foundation Design (Auger Cast/Timber Piles) Page 9 Auger.Cast Piles Page 9 Timber Piles Page 10 Slab -on -Grade Floors Page 10 Drainage Page 10 Utilities Page 11 General Page 11 Appendix A Test Pit Location Map Appendix B Test Pit Logs Appendix C Unified Soils Classification System CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 12919N.E.126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 August 30, 1990 Job No. 9008-16G Newport Homes 18714 78th Place West Edmonds, Washington Attention: Jeff Vehrs Reference: Schroeder Short Plat South of Aloha Place Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Vehrs: c) SEP 14 1990 PERMIT, COUNTER At your request, we have conducted our preliminary soils investigation f or Lots 1 and 2 of the Schroeder property. The following report summarizes our observations and offers conclusions and preliminary recommendations for developing the properties. SCOPE The scope of our study was to investigate the subsurface soil and ground water conditions in order to delineate areas of potentially difficult soils and to formulate conclusions and preliminary recommendations f or development of the two (2) lots. The site investigation was based on a visual surface reconnaissance of the properties, a review of the available geologic maps and by observing the excavation of four (4) trackhoe test pits on August 23, 1990. This report offers conclusions regarding expected difficulties and preliminary recommendations for general foundation design parameters, site preparation, grading, drainage and slope stability. F I Ll I I � I August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 2 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand that you plan to short plat the existing, east -west trending, rectangular shaped, approximately 1.1 acre property into three (3) smaller lots. You plan to build a residence on the two (2) western lots of the property. An existing residence is located on the eastern lot (Lot 3). A plat plan and a topographic site map, dated May 31 and June 11, 1990, respectively, have been provided to us. These plans were prepared by Lovell-Sauerland and Associates, Inc. No building design or plans have been provided to us. We recommend that our office be engaged to review the final building plans for Lots 1 and 2 once they become available in order for us to make further recommendations as required. SITE DESCRIPTION The property is located approximately 2500 feet east of Puget Sound in Edmonds, Washington. The two (2) lots comprise the western portion of an east -west trending, nearly rectangular, 24,500 square foot parcel located south of Aloha Place and northeast of 8th Avenue North. The parcel is bounded by a northwest facing slope to the east and f lat ground to the west, south and north. The ground to the south is uncleared and unpaved roadways are located on the northern portion and western edge of the parcel, respectively. A housing development is located to the north. Both referenced lots are located on relatively flat ground which have been cleared in the past. The western lots are covered with tall grasses and brush. No standing water was observed at the time of our August 23, 1990 visit. Standing water was observed on the CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 3 property adjacent to and south of Lot 1 during a site visit by our firm on June.22, 1990. SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Site subsurface conditions were investigated by observing the excavation of a total of four (4), trackhoe test pits on August 23, 1990. The test pit locations were selected by an engineering geologist from our office and located by pacing relative to property lines and other identifiable landmarks. The Test , Pit Location Map is presented in Appendix A. Depths referred to in this report are relative to the existing ground surface at the time of our investigation. For detailed test pit logs and soil descriptions, see Appendix B. All soils were classified in the field according to the Unified Soils Classification System. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pits were returned to our office for further visual examinations. A copy of the Unified Soils Classification System is presented in Appendix C. Soil Conditions In general, it appears from our investigations that Lots 1 and 2 are underlain by seven'and one-half (7 1/2) to fourteen (14) feet of very soft, wet peat and organic silt. The organic soils appear to thin towards the southeastern corner of Lot 2. In Test Pits #1 and #3, two (2) feet of uncontrolled fill was observed overlying the organic soil. Underlying the organic material is a saturated, loose to medium .1 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 4 dense sand. The sand grades into a mottled light brown and dense sand with trace gravel and cobbles. All of the test pits were terminated within the medium dense to dense sand at depths of between twelve (12) and seventeen (17) feet below the surface. The property has been mapped within an area of Vashon advance outwash as shown on the "Geologic Map of the Edmonds Quadrangle" (USGS Map MF-1541, Minard, 1983). The Vashon advance outwash is defined as clean, pebbly sand which was deposited by meltwater flowing from the advancing front of the glacier. The sand found underlying the organic soils is consistent with this classification. Ground Water We observed the subsurface hydrologic system through test pits only. The observations and conclusions provided here are general and may not reflect all aspects of the subsurface water flow. Weak ground water seepage was encountered throughout the saturated organic soils. Moderate to heavy ground water seepage was found in the sand underlying the organic soil. �Ii�qfoup w- --p:[-ts—i�n-d-i�-c-ate-s-thzit-tlid--� L-g-rPund water table nearlv level with the cLund suriace., The ground water level is not known for different periods of the year; however, based on our observations made during our soil exploration of the property to the south on June 22, 1990, the level may be at a higher level during the wet season. � I I � I � I I I August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 5 however, CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL CONCLUSIONS 1 2 are underlain by very poor soils and will be dif f icult s-iv.eto- develo- The proposed development is feasible, if our recommendations are closely followed. Based on our test pit subsurface exploration,. the flat, low-lying ground on the properties is underlain by between seven and one-half (7 1/2) to fourteen (14) feet of very soft organic soil. Uncontrolled fill up to two (2) feet thick mantles the organic soil along the northern and western edges of the parcel. The area not covered with uncontrolled fill is a poorly drained, swampy area that contains species of hydric plants and appears to be wet throughout the year. i i-s —are --fto-tf-§u!t-a-)5re—f 6-r--E tural__� he QrgAp.�c s-61 he supp_o��t__qf !itru_c___ �Xq_�a such as foundations, slab -on -grade floors and pavements if significant dif f erent-i-a-1--settlement is to be av ed.� The proposed residences will require a deep foundation to limit differential settlement. Detailed and specific recommendations for a deep foundation are presented below. Methane Gas The presence of a thick layer of organic soils may allow a build- up of methane and other' gases in spaces under the proposed residences if not properly ventilated. �,�wW---sh—ld-b-e—erygaged-t-ci-,, 1-6 and --(ie-t-�-fl-ed—recd-mm—enda-t-i�o-n-§--"�Ff-t-6f--th-e-'f- "nll- ,--building--plans are pKqpair�e_d-� CASCADE GEbTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes ob No. 9008-16G Page 6 RECOMMENDATIONS The organic soils present on the two (2) lots are 'apparently saturated throughout the year and standing water is present during the wet season. We therefore recommend ng �Kft-epreparatlon-, 4n—d -You—ndci-t-i-o-n--�iork—duriiiq--ttfe�-driest-period-of---the-summer-t-o� a-te- .minimize-jqxcessive costs and &oristfuct�ion tij�6blemEi odi� d with a--shallow-Nq -I:ayer-.--. -qt,er_table and the thick, ... very sof organid 96i-1 We should be engaged to provide specific and detailed recommendations for any proposed development once more detailed plans have been developed. Site Preparation The organic soils were found to be saturated and are very sensitive to disturbance. In order to preserve some bearing capacity for construction equipment and to provide proper drainagej w6 Yt�cbmmend--, -�h-&t-at-l:ea:st-tht-6-e-(-3-y-f �ie`t-&f -a--f -ill- iifdt`-ei��a 1-be ,�p�_aced in the proposed bdildi�-5�(;j drive--w--a- ---d-rid constrd-c-t-.-i-on—accii�F-s-s-� y We recommend. leaving the uncontrolled fill where it exists otherwise undisturbed. Specific recommendations' for fill placement are provided below. Tracked equipment should be used as much as possible and the use of heavy loaded, �.rubber-tired vehicles shouid bLe-avqtded.-.1 -E-of —11--- ,jp9h minus crushed �_rp�ck, appr6-V-6d7-f)-ft run or a granular soil which conforms lf(5--the-, �f 71 o w i -n4 -g-r i i d-a -ti -o -n-.- I I 9 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 7 Sieve Size 4 inch #4 #200 Percent Passing 100 25-75 5 maximum based on the fraction pass- ing the #4 sieve. The fill should be placed in loose lifts and mechanically compacted. -2-4)- int h-e-9- ,Anc4@-s thick and --all- subse�qqpnt lifts -shouldbe -we, ve thick. Thel surf ace --should- -be --graded to dradn. _f&_cbMMerfd___that____t_fie p , or-fions-of __ -the-- bTildTn___ _d 9,__ _ riveway-and n- -access - -areas--wh-ich- --are- drganit� -:�.dil--be�-dr-aiff�i-d-b-f--any--standing- water-. All large trees should be removed. The existing vegetation cover should be left in place and covered with the fill material. We recommend against excavating into the peat to avoid ground water. re-the-placemen 6 V�Detailed and specific recommendations regarding these drains are outlined in our "Drainage" section. Paved Driveways The organic soil observed underlying the properties is not normally useable as a driveway subgrade. Unacceptable settlement and distress to the pavement surface would be expected if the roadway were placed on the existing ground surface. In order to reduce driveway settlement and distress, any ion sh��_u_ld_-be, J!sUt�_p—orted_ f6u-n-(Ia-t�i-o-n--a--s--r-ec—om-m--e--n-de-d---------- -s-ec- t-1—on _x --.in,,:the -Foundation Design of_this 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 8 :report. Any prop-o-sed drivem-a- - ys-which cross' the --- area of organic -9 ,,soil should b - e - located-i-ri-dh Area where -the existing uncontrolled fill is locate(!.-- ) If the owner is willing to accept the risk of driveway settlement, distress, increased maintenance and the associated repair costs, til- f --h -- Mitafi--500X-o-n` C ,driveways may_utilize a geo ex i e a c suc as X�6 exposed subgrade th ng p;j _p1aci- - -aminimuirfof three --(3)---f&et -of' fre - e draining _filj-pver -- the ' fabric. The recommendations regarding site preparation should be followed before the construction of the driveway. The free -draining fill should consi st of material which conforms to the gradation given in our Site Preparation section. The---fill- ',should be placed -accord ing-to- our -recommendations giv I en i-ft - the sdme- section and, compacted to at -least 90 percent -of -the Astm b-1557 'maximum -dry density. kfter --placing -the- road wa y-,f ill, -W6 -recommend- oadVay leaving the r unpaved as --long as -possible- or utiliziiig-'-5/8 --inch minus crushed - rock as the f inal surface. This will make re of -initial s ettlements le ss expensive and much easier-. We recommend the. sub -grade be. leveled and recompacted- prior to' -pi a-c - ihq --the---base---- -coarse. We -recommend a pavement section 66fi-s-isting- of--fou-r- -(4)--inchdsof 5/8-inch minus crushed rock base coarse and tw6`-(2-)--inches- of Class B asphaltic concrete.. The owner should be aware that settlement of the proposed driveway should be expected if it is placed over areas of organic soil. and periodic pavement repairs should be anticipated throughout the lifetime of the driveway. The recommendations presented in this CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 9 section are intended only to minimize driveway settlement and distress. Foundation Design (Auger CastjTimber PIles) We recommend that the proposed residences be supported by sixteen (16) inch diameter, auger cast -in -place piles or new, driven, treated timber piles. This will transfer the buildi�g load to the native bearing soil below the organic soil and minimize the amount of differential settlement. The spacing of -the auger cast/timber piles should be specified by your structural engineer. Auger Cast Piles Individual auger cast piles may be designed for an allowable bearing load of twenty (20) tons, and a lateral load of two (2) tons. We have not performed a seismic analysis in determining the lateral capacity of the piles. The lateral capacity will be developed in the lower portion of the piles. We estimate the "point of fixity" at the point of penetration into the medium dense sand found approximately one (1) foot below the base of the organic soil. We estimate.that the pile lengths will range from thirteen and one- half (13 1/2) to twenty (20) feet. Pile leng ths will differ due to the variable depth to bearing soil. We recommend a minimum grout strength of 3000 psi to help ensure pile quality. We should be engaged to observe the auger drilling to confirm penetration into suitable'bearing soil. All auger cast piles should be steel reinforced as recommended by the structural engineer. I I CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 10 Timber Piles Timber piles should consist of good quality, new treated wood that conform to ASTM D25-70 specifications. We recommend that the timber piles be driven to an allowable bearing load of twenty (20) tons each using the modified ENR formula or another accepted pile - driving f ormula. We should be engaged to inspect timber pile placement to verify they are suitable to support the design loads. Lateral loads for timber piles will vary with the depth of penetration into bearing soil. We should be engaged to provide lateral forces after the final plans are prepared. Slab -on -Grade Floors Pile support will be needed for any proposed slab -on -grade floors if the. owner is not willing to accept significant differential settlement. We recommend that the slab be structurally reinforced and not be tied to the wall foundations. The slab may be placed directly onto the free -draining fill material. Interior slabs should be prov ' ided with a vapor barrier which is placed on the free -draining fill subgrade. One (1) to two (2) inches of sand may be placed over the fill subgrade to aid in the curing of the concrete. Drainage W6'_:te -Eftdh- diameter ilding-perimeter 'f6—un6a:ti-6iis7_an& �gtl�inin�g to the, storm sewer system--, The drains should be bedded and backfilled with a minimum of twelve (12) inches of pea Igravel. I 0 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 11 Roof downspouts should be tightlined into the storm sewer system separately from the footing drains. We recommend placing a drainage system consisting of a series of French drains outside any proposed building and driveway areas to prevent the upper section of the fill from becoming saturated during the wet season. The drains should be placed before the placement of the fill material and should be tightlined to the storm sewer system. The drains should consist of four (4) inch diameter, rigid, perforated pipe thatis bedded and backfilled in pea gravel or washed rock. The placement of the drains should be completed before the commencement of construction of driveways or the proposed reside nces.- The spacing of the drains should be specified by the appropriate engineer. utilities Where sanitary and storm sewers are to run across areas of organic soils, the owner should be aware that fill settlement loads can damage the buried pipes. Utility lines which are small and shallow may be supported on fill, but some settlement should be anticipated. Deep or settlement sensitive sewer and other utility lines may require pile support. We should be engaged to provide additional recommendations. General We recommend that we be engaged to review the final building plans to provide any additional or alternate recommendations that may be necessary. We should be engaged to observe all site preparation and fill placement, and test the compaction of the fill material. I I CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 30, 1990 Newport Homes Job No. 9008-16G Page 12 We should also observe the placement of auger-cast/timber piles to confirm adequate penetration into suitable bearing soil. These services are in addition to any required testing agency work. We expect the on -site soil and ground water conditions to reflect our findings; however, some variations may occur. Should soil conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, we recommend that we be contacted immediately to determine if additional or alternate recommendations are required. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Newport Homes for the specific application to the proposed developments on Lots 1 and 2 located south of Aloha Place, Edmonds, Washington, in accordance with generally accepted soil- and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. S incerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL� G ge E. I S I S9 Principal Engi eer tq�\� ONO. a- J on Olsson gineering Geologist JS: pg APPENDIX A .$CHRQFDER LOTS TEST PIT LOCATION WIAP LOTI, LOT 2 Tp.l PFCK)SM FaMIM TV KUPOSM ReSMM L-- XTP.410�� TP2 I /XZ lb FROM SrrE R-AN BY LDVB-L-S�� & k%OaATES, K, CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 KJRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 �&16G I SCALE s V= 40 LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE 0 08/23/90 iDwn._By lEn *ol HLA *1 0 APPENDIX B I tT..P.,1 - I Soil Description & Classification T.P. 2 1 Soil Description & Classification 0 0 - TUNCONTROLLED FILL: brown, dry silty sand & sand. 2' - 9TEAT; dark brown, with organic si -�Z— very soft, saturated. (PT) -.5 9' - 14'ORGANIC SILT/PEAT; brown, -10 . wet. (OH/PT) 14'-1 TSAND: blue gray in upper 2' 0 0 becoming mottled light brown 15 — Do. SM: below this, medium dense to 0 0 0..*.?,*.'. dense, saturated, fine to medium grained. (SW/SP) 0 0`4 T.D. = 17.0' 0 777-57- 0 - EITEAT: dark brown, with organic silt, very soft, saturated. (PT) -5 —4�-.. -at 416. 8'-1 3.5'ORGANIC SILT/PEAT; brown, soft, wet. (OH/PT) -10 13.5'-1 6.5'SAND; blue gray in upper 2' 00 becoming mottled light browr . k' 0 0 0 below this, medium dense tc 0 0 dense, saturated, fine to medium 0 0; 0 grained. (SW/SP) 0 * a ar.... T.D. 16.5' -20 -20 L I Notes: Notes: Weak ground water seepage throughout upper Weak ground water seepage between 2' & 8' peat layer. Heavy seepage below 14'. Caving Heavy seepage below 13.5'. Caving below 13.5'. below 14'. 1 TEST PIT LOG CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SCHROEDER L 0 TS I Date 08/23/90 1 Job No. 908-16G I Dwn. By HLA I Geo/Eng *IT I I T.?. 3 - I Soil DescripZon & Classification T.P. 4 1 Soil Description & Classification 0 —Pm=xm 0 - TUNCONTROLLED FILL; brown, 9*9 dry silty sand & sand. -5 — 2'- 8'PEAT: dark brown, with organic silt, very soft, saturated. (PT) 8'- 13'ORGANIC SILT/PEAT; brown, soft, wet. (OH/PT) 13'-1 6.5'SAND: slightly mottled brown -0 becoming light brown with depth, ! . 0--o* with trace gravel & cobbles, dense, saturated at top becoming 15 —'*0-- o-000 wet. (SW) 0 0. 0. 0. 00 T.D. = 16.5' -20 Notes: Weak to heavy ground water seepage between 2' & 8'. Heavy ground water seepage below 13'. TEST PIT LOG CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 0 0 - 7.5'ORGANIC SIMPEAT: dark brown, very soft, saturated. (OH/PT) -5 00- 7.5'- 12'SANDe mottled light brown,with 0* �M a : 0 a trace gravel & cobbles, dense, wet, *0 0* fine to coarse grained. (SW) 00 *. 00 -10— - *0-:: 00.0 00 0 oo T-D- 1211' -15 -20 Notes: Weak to heavy seepage between 1' & 7.5'. SCHROEDER LOTS I Date 08/23/90 1 Job No. 908-18G I Dwn. By HLA I Geo/Eng 0 1 I I I APPENDIX C I UNIFIED *ILS CLASSIFICATON SYSTEM j MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL LETTER DESCRIPTION GW Well - graded grovels or gravel - sand mixtures, CLEAN little of no fines poorly graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures, GRAVELS GRAVEL & P little or no fines GRAVELLY SOILS GM Silty gravels or gravel - sand -silt mixtures GRAVELS . WITH FINES COARSE GC Clayey gravels or gravel -sand -clay mixtures GRAINED Well -graded sands or gravelly sands, little or SOILS CLEAN :0 SW no fines SANDS Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little SAND & SP or no fines SANDY SOILS SM Silly sands or sand -silt mixtures SANDS WITH FINES S Clayey sands or sand -clay mixtures inorganic slits & very fine sands. rock flour. silty ML or clayey fine sands, or clayey slits with slight' SILTS & CLAYS plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, CL gravelly clays. sandy clays, silty clays or lean clays Liquid Limit Less Then 50 Organic silts & organic silty clays of low FINE OL plasticity GRAINED inorganic slits. micaceous or diatomaceous I ine SOILS MH . sandy or silty soils, elastic silts S I LTS & CLAYS CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, tat clays Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, OH organic slits HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat or other highly organic soils TOPSOIL Humus & duff foyer FILL Uncontrolled. with highly variable constituents SYM SOL DATUM NOTE 2"O.D. Split Spoon Sampler Sample Interval Ring or Shelby Sampler Sample Interval S mpler Pushed Sample Interval Other Sample Type Sample Interval SYM SOL DATUM NOTE Water Level Date Recorded Ts 1 Torvane Reading qU Penetrometer Reading Water Observation Well Tip Elevation CA CADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF KEY CHART CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. If, DETENTIO tWORK SHEET STREET. FILE pfi-jot4 PI" LENGTH COWROL CA-Tt" 0r.TE e— BASIN (VC"T) 2' MAX COVER SLOPE SYSTEM CROSS SECTION cosfrstoL! ,7- 'TO OUTL-E*T (si PR4P OR RUNOFF SPREADER) 2' . 2' G" CPEj-- . At- 16" SPAUS (M WOL1^0 2V 2' 3" DGEP, V4*- r-RusiAEv mDrcy, N7 FROM 7 0 7Urr L EE�-T- CON-rROL RIPRAP OUTLET "'""'ED r,1-4.*YE'L) rOUTFLOW TRENCR, MIN 10* LONG, -r0P 4 -4" PE-PF PIPE -M BE W=-VeL FROM 0 Lrr-, T=T CON-rRDL 'L 4:' PF-RF PJPF_ WIT14 CA.P.S RUNOFF SPREADER OUTLET FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE Page 9 of 9 CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM *TANDARD DRAINAGC"k DE.TENTION SYSTItM'..;,%� for -kfv VA� Q 0 r T VfOrKe SZ4 location—L-0f- 7- plan by -' es eJ— -T, e- + m phone 771— 6 ZI L date- 77� DESIGN DATA System Imperm Pipe Pipe Orifice�,'. Number Area Diam Length Diameter 3 91? "1 CS 1 SA 5TPrA1D"f LILSrcm NOTES 1. Call Engineering Division (771-3202'1 for prebackfill and final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the reSDonsibility of the property owner(s). Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch basins to allow proper ori�ration. The outlet control orifice must be kept open at_all times. PROVE..0 b U CITY OF EDMONDS'— STREET FILE 'On a CAS. VIE:, r 7, WOOR w CAV-M MAPLVWO HIL.IELE. "SC.AD AL A $I CAt LA 'NO Y Ly C 1A 6 K7 c A T03RD $7 SW t 12Wik2IM IT -11 GALEI TIZ $I ..... I I w 'v *A CoLLEG PLACE L2 IL, I . ELem actlooL PINi 06 g RIDGE I DRho 2 E0.0108 .1 S. z PARK 10 v A E.Al. rvj*�' . I . " . Ti� COLLEGE PLACE pol 4R HIGH WHOOL IT .' .1, W, 9 -t A IL I ,E o"cr 10STI M. W; 7- v v. -PARK Nomom no. 19 CI*A1 IT 3 2 11 1 TL.9 , 1 9 EomoNDsi 29 A. .0. SPflUCE I 1. 21. S. SR 8 CH 2 T. IL I.T. OL m PARK 2.1T. $1 SW .1 w 1. w SEAMOhtt .4, 2151. z "IT. " I ; - I 1= IT R 1. 1 1151. L I. DAY CITY LIMIT6 SIT 4 .1 .1 sw :47 STEVEN CHAS IS .1 sw 1111. .1 m E MoRIAL LAKr. oSpt ISAL ELEM I Z H TAL CH r. -n A I ale. a L' to w STCLATE I"T. E SCH j. I L M*. rmo IT It . .0 r Bw AVO %WAY 13,:H EsPaRAmcc 22 4 EEP-... 4w s. W. 274TH 21.- 21STH W, 26TW RTW a ST 22- -W �"-Tw &J'!T. M 0 U N T L A K E 12". IT 4i) N.1oo 924T. 15 1 , I w J, I w 0 0 D W A Y I U4TH K SW T E R R A C E 22 PL T..h 1 1 26 IT a 'p /31 36 31 2"T. 2"'. 1 I 'w 1B rk. 6ftT I I IT MIT I. j.51 ,3g 231 "'.0 61 IT w I 232.D 11"o 3. MID w MIT MT. o 111T" 11 1* PL III I 2a". K' II. t US IT w 4-T., �0! WOODWAY 1* 4. LAKE �4 CLEM SCH I v B VIWRoO.NAII 2.1; .1 e jR HIM. ec"o 2 11. Jv Ft 11 NOLINE Ar- CLEM xcH U IT IT I /w WWI. ns- W 'IOT" K 8. K A I BA.LLINGER IT IT 9 0 I.-D IT ow ... I - I Xm S." FIRDAU IT IM00011AISM C04JMTY um I T27" 24 i D w 31 a)...., c, TO INTERSTATE 5 AND IT c., Our, of . .... LAKE FOREST PARK 6 o A 890 ACTION A S S E T I N F 0 R M A T I 0 N ASSET CITY100F EDMONDS 'of INFORMATION FINANCE DEPARTMENT * EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 * (206) 775-2525 SHEET STREET FILE ASSET NO. 6J—y 7 BATCH DATE -0-6-30-9-1 El NEW 7 ADD CATEGORY CODE: _H_ - DESCRIPTION: 31 11 LOCATION: EITRANSFER SERIAL NO h A 1:1 RETIRE a * "L" — LOCATION CODE: —1—N ACCOUNT NO. Lf YL 00 - 63 DEPRECIATION CODE: EK, Y El N LIFE OF ASSET: -2. —J'-- YEARS WARRANT/ PROJECT: N 0. DATE: -0-5-2-9-S-1- COST $ INITIATED BY APPROVED -BY TRANSFER DATE TRANSFER FROM TRANSFER TO U7C 0 D El R A N S F 3 E R 4 R ACCOUNTING USE ONLY E T RETIREMENT DATE I R RETIREMENT METHOD E M RECEIPT NO. TOTAL DEPRECIATION E N GAIN (LOSS) T DEPARTMENT FILE .��rj Z PME�,Ir: 087 F-LeCAIC TOTAL 6TARON STBEET FILw-rHOD: R&D TAAVdAtS6 'recollAcy, CoAIFOA 44 %5 7*0 WqC 3Je - 130 -0 �0 M01,10A46AIAS V1,517,60: '5-ee-lo CwTeAuAlt OF'545C. e4 N Od 2'2 W 1334; 64' 4.(65 4 ASIS OF BEARINGS q Mr.OF ALOHA - 11OL.47, R3. e,36 A I tl 0.4 .0 40 20 0 60 by'sw L GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND .0 -,58T 1ROA1 PJ�J WIPLAVIC CA10 dvo'o 0- P00jV0 AS NOff-D ZQ -r, t; INJ 41 OC _j F7 --------- (n A10'e6"56*W 'It > D� 65-140 ALOHArn qj r "j PLACE X, to;� < :z t� V) tu J� ps� I (z, z 0 ru cc I:z tj I jrr) rJ4 'V. 1(Zl �j (Zi, 1��- ' G P-n I 'ICO -CIC 'V. rr) N_ Ui 01 I C) CIL� Z j-.: LL)j n 1r) n 0- iz, N% �� ftj (:) � 'O'Z -4 "Q ;� 'j LU )W U� qj , i-z P U, tu V) C.) X. bttl AVE. No 1, ------------- t LA /10.001 //0.00' 1 17 1 -W-r A, — 0 Ex. eoWaTIS —io":1 1/ 3. V N0'1a6'S5"W "*11� W. I Wd 1� /)a, 6 6 114, 5 e- e-SA47 4F"`(61Oqo10eo .1%, - ' /. " . . 'V . WTCAIAaCe A6PAIA AA1O/0A ' i ** ' " -^ON.STRUCP16AJOFA�IYI?0,4,OW,IYO'A'I - .1 UTICS COMMUCTf-D 0P01\10A W17Hik)' ' :_ IA16A&%SS d6A85S AVD U71LITY eSM'T. 3 ZOr,5 �Id 4-S PIIOP106D FOA NMEIA) 11qU_ 156 BO�Ne_ 6iP1JA1_6,V,9tJDJ011,1,rL,51 7*116 0 WMEM 0 F * 1.0 71\5 e 1 3' V6,5-S TO IOT J AS AeSTAICT60, ro P A VE. 14. I I- / 17, '_� WY-4,06C. 64 CHO/ir 60,6,01VAVOAI�FOA -b0iV;4LD SCIYAdeL16A IN -3 C 114 - A/ W V4, LT if C r1OA1 e4, r e M, R. 3 d ., W. 44. elry OF �60MOIVD,3 smotYomlisff couwy, wAslyllvarciAl 90M M Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. EngUieers/SurveyoIji/Plannets/ Development Comullonts 1'140Q,33id Avenue W. Suite 200 -Lynnwood. WA 9&)36- ooewmwl -(206)340,0&30 DRAWN MCKED 1-MATE - r a. SCAU flu NO. J. r . 5.31-170 139 ?4 89- P?,3 P Pmrmv4&rsaff&i_r_T &E PM=, NAMI APPLICATION, SINGLE, -y) kp:TaACX`S CHEICKEP V"w, M/;m 7/ wy -.77 TM1717 77777',7�! CONDITTCNAL'USL PERMIT Oft vo ADB CIIECIM, T717777771777 3 77TRI 101.11HER zl� ��S .4 T=7 ENVIRCR-I FEATURES 77T777777 T1777777T 777777// ACCESS SLOPE VEHICLE E1311 0 6 DRAINAGE PLAN (on sit�i 7 STREET FILE 1117TI771111111 /6 /'FO 8 jALWAL DESCRIPTION VF=PICAT.TCN'��--.��CW.I"�1"4r 9 .7 - , 1 QJIT CLAIM/DEDICATIONS 74, "'ra/i/fe lo EMENT Pmlic �MTE /pp /W/t/U 77/ /W/M _,.,CAL(=TE SEWER CONNECTION lF'NO'LID#tivt-ql_7kl:l;l�`i� -I//// '/Z/3/f 12 771/7777 PLAT/SUBDIVISICN RBOUIREMENTS 13 'V, RIGHT-OF-WAY CIONSTRUCTION PErArr REQD.' 14 BOND REQD` FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Ad 777777 15 SOILS CONDITIONS & GRUJND 7777777 1"T11T1 WATER FIElD CHECKED 16 STREET PAVING REWIRED 1_/Al ITTIT01 171? 17 CURB AND GUTTER REQUIRED 18 SIDEWALK REW.TPtED 7719 19 CURB CUTIOR DRIVEWAY REM 71777 2 o 7TF17TMI STRE Er NAME SIGN h 21. 4 ON 22 SIDE SEWER AVAILABILITY /W/W 23 -45- 711,111 1711. 77777 EXISTING WATER MAIN -SIZE 24 WATER METER SIZE ti 11117111 77/7T/T/7 .25 SERVICE LINE SIZE 26 HYDRANT REQJIRED 7771777 ITIT117 1777= 27 HYDRANT SIZE EXISTING 14 'T TTITI /77 28 CROSS CONNE)CTICN INSPECTION REOD. 29 - WATER METER CHARGE REDD 77T /7 7 - T IT 30 FIRE LIM CHARGE P= - SPRIN`nM 77777777 1111111171 31 32 ,OPEN DrTCH EXIS Tn4G 33 ON w 7 34 ITMI /fl////// CULY 35 jqg SIZE 36 CATCH BASIN PJ= gs* 14/3 37 ��'INDICATED ON SITE PLAN 7777 777T= 77TM777 WY, 121JI�0 38 SHOLMDER DRAINAGE MAINTAIN 77T[RTff SHALE OPEN RE)NOFF,": 39 MISCI 7/T/T/7777F/7T/77 40 oe� REVIEWED BY:' RKS PLANNING Mm.--i 'ENGINEERING�, P Aov",, r 4: N I/ UP pq w za. ol� . 411 Coo UNN PeA 10 - fYF 41, F 34 % V( 1943( le 14.0 o *,�i le '14.0 ma co AT 19 11,40 4 N 0' ?4' 00" W le I �.o Z,'THI(/KfNW fP(A e IT ee 'Utiz (10 f(p le 11.04. 16 Ito .01`6 WAr. 11419 O"I'V6, �,-I.O% "42 R11"i XY d,466 Te-MF' MY- eNM4M9, 41-i,,'aUAFIZY �IFALLP, 6,' THI( X' IRP-1 I T41 L 6 1�44 >.17.0 W) MILT Mvc (91� PETAL) M (f I�Hf WN0, 10.0% IA r iZt -14. 00 M 10 94"WbPe'(.6HOOTH) '12,1.0% 'ret". 1.0 1% AL.- �W& VIZAIN(�X) 0� AgNU� Me (fl f -50'MIN "ROVED NOETH ALZ