527 FORSYTH LN.PDF11111111111111
11344
527 FORSYTH LN
qjjY OF EDMONDS
PUBLIC WOM - EWJIPMEM� cj-
z� � RLE
ACTION REPORT
N? 2689 -
SUSPENSE DATE:
Date: Time: File#
Attachments:
SUBJE�CT:
REQUESTOR: cyz,�L /u
71
ADDRESS 4�g ,Y"K O^Z
PHONE:
REQUEST RECEIVED BY:
TELEPHONE r---]
CONTACT IN OFFICE r--j
OTHER-- t
,k
RECEIVED BY: aa-aft-tj
MITC Tn-
w
BE
M4. d!
M
a
0
MM
HIM
MMMM
MM
umwlwe���=Mum
MM
MMEWW'00,011UP
=11MM"EMMMM
MM
um����=Mfflm
MM
ACTION:
All Concerned Notified
Action Completed/File
STREET FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 * (206) 775-2525
""Ely-ED
April 4, 1984 /1 pr� 1�84
C17-Y
-OF EDM9�VO4
MEMO TO: Mary Lou Block
Planning Director
FROM: Dia Bock
Mary Lou -
Before the
that I see
complaints
you please
involved a
the Mayor.
Thank you.
I'll start this off with you please.
Mayor left town yesterday he asked
that the "staff investigates these
and reports back to him. Will
see that the appropriate staff are
id coordinate a quick response for
He will be back on Friday morning.
I t
V t
D / �/ ? . .
ATE
CITY OF EDMONDS
COMPLAINT RECORD
Complaint voiced by:
Name:— 1'51alllep�012 1-12,
Address:
Property owner: Yes No
Where
Address of property 5-7'
to be investigated:
Name of owner;
Address: Phone:
Description of complaint:
41 f
al;751�1 1,�7 �,/ 1�1 �' /L-'
,//') 1'17 4/eIr/�k
Result of investigation:
April 2, 1984
Mayor Larry S. Naughten
City of Edmonds
505 Bell Street
Edmonds, Wa., 98020
Dear Mr. Naughton;
RECEIVED
APR 3 1984
Executive Offices
We wish to inform you of the "Neighborhood Blight" that exists
atthe rear of the property located at 536 Pine St., owned by a
Mr. Kenneth Olsen. Hopefully, the City of Edmonds will. not ignore
our complaints which are as follows:
First of all, the said owner of this property refuses to cncpergte
with the residents of this neighborhood In regard to ridd-ing the
premises of numerous "junk" automobiles, ' Dlus old and dete7iorqted
auto parts, plus odds and edds of junk that litter the yard..
He also keeps a dog penned up, 24 hours a day, and, the poor animal
Is obviously there for "watch dog purposes" only. The poor animal
Is confined to the pen, never gets any exercise, and in our opinion
is sadly neglected. There have been reports of rats attempting to
reach the dog food, placed In the pen, and of a neighbor resorting
to the use of a pellet gun, in order to keep them under control.
I witnessed a rat crawling up the stairway, which leads to a rental
unit, which is also located on his property, at 540 Pine. I
reported this incident to a City employee and was dismissed with:
"Oh well, Ed.mond.s does have a rat problem."
We are also questioning the legality of his having rental property
on a single family lot. I questioned, the employee in regard. to
this matter, and was informed that he was granted a permit by the
City of Edmonds Building Dept. There surely must be some misunder-
standing. Perhaps he was granted a permit to construot q Carport
over his junk automobiles. I really feel that the existing
conditions warrant an Invest.1gation on the part of the City of
Edmonds.
This Is a neighborhood of well manicured lawns, and well aRred. for
homes. Call It Pride In Ownership, or whatever. It Is shameful and
deplorable that one person must be so uncooperative,and refuses
to respect the rie,,hts of other's. We do not feel that we are
creating a Ilh-9rdship" on the p-qrt of the City of Edmonds, by
requesting a totql investigation of this problem.
His "Rental" located in the rear is a typical "shanty" and its'
occupants use the roof of the carport for a deck, complete with
weight lifting equipment, picnic table, benche.s, etc. There are
no rails, as a safety factor,...Would this meet the requirements
of.the Building Dept?
We find the "view" very offensive, as do the neighbors who un-
fortunately have not had any success In dealing with Mr. Olsen.
I have been informed that they are willing to cooperate In
signing a complaint in order to force h1m.to "clean up his act."
In fact, I have been contamplating "wallpapering" our kitchen
window, In order to blot out the offensive "view."
This morning, I contacted Animal Control, and requested a Complaint
Form In regard to the dog. The dog Is relatively quiet during the"..
day, but starts barking In the evenings and continues until 6:00 AF.1
Needless to say, we get very little sleep,and are up hourly
shouting ."Q U I E T We then attempt to get*back to sleep
and then ' he starts bar�ln*g again. The treatment of this animal
should be reported to the Humane Society.
We sincerely Invite you, or a member of your Staff to ga,ze in
ifecstasy" at our "fantastic view" of the "Edmonds Junk and. Auto
Parts Yard" Inconveniently located at 540 Pine St. (Rear)
Most assuredly, I could continue calling the Bld.g. Dept., Health
Dept., etc. etc., but to no avail. No informative answers or
Information Is offered. It Is somewhat disheartening, therefore
why not "go tothe TOP" which Is you, Sir. Hopefully, you will
be able to supply som; of the answers. Mainly, did Mr. Olsen
receive a "special dispensation" In order to have multiple housing
on his property? Secondly, this junk yard is a total disgrace
to the neighborhood, and our beautiful City of Edmonds. We are
proud. to live here and let's h2ep Edmonds beautiful !
Thank you for your time, Mr. Naughtom, and we do ' appreciate any
assistance and.information that you might offer.
-1.
Veqy truly yours,
tthleen M. L:
527 Forsyth Lane -
Edmonds, Wa.. 98020
771-4935
Afterthought -
I wonder if the "Rental" would
pass Inspection by the Edmonds
Fire Department. .
ca/ Arne Olsen, Owner,Aring Apts.
INMER-OFFICE COMMUNISMONS
DATE September 30 _1983
TO Planning FROM Building
AM Wwe.Mrisian� oo-,
Fi re
SUBJECT: 10 unit condominium @ 520 Pine Street; Permit#830019
Please do a final inspection on the above project and
return comments to the Building Department by
October 7, 1983 —0e V
ED
U
0
0
(D
CITY OF EDMONDS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
A. oAddress or vici.n,ity.of Construction
0 Owner: I c " , , e " I � ",
Name
Mailing Address
4
C1, ty., State, Zip Code
0 Contractor: —
Name
Malling'Address
�' I -)j -,(If (05 L4')A
City, State, Zip Code
Issue Date A9,
0 Permit Issued To:
y ( � , JL;
o Type of Work to be Done: ("U
o Work in Connection With:
0 Sub or Plat 0 Single Family
11 Comml. / Ind. Apt. Condo.
o Pavement Cut: 0 Yes No
State License Number
—Y ��' I — -'Z 7/.22
Telephone Number
b.
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments'or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering.
Call 775-2525, extension Zm -asl?
I understand that this permit must be available alt the,job site for inspection purposes at all times.
Signature:
Date
Oivner or Agent
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
C. Issuccl By:
Time Authorized: Vold after days
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
PermitFee: '43o.00
Security Deposit:
Receipt No.: -
Fund III Fee:
Street Cut Dimensions
X—
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
Eng. Div. December 1978
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES
(Fund 111 - Route cony to Street -Dent.
r^MM__ +. � -
Diagram:
e)
Contractor called for inspection (Yell;-` NO
T
Nork Disa.pproved By: Date: Bv: Date:
Work Approved Bv: Date:
Inspector:
Ena. Div. December 1978
STREET FILE
PUBLIC UORKS DEPARMIM CHEacusr 17,
BUILD= PEIMT REVIEW 0 A /F -5-7-.
(address) (date)
Street.Rig�t-of-Way Existing_���.t�- �._REQBL_
Z
I
Access Easements Existing REQD
Utility Easement Existilng. �REQD-
94
Lot Per Subdivision Plat Assessor Map 25-
W
Site Plan Checked for Accura
Z
Underground Wiring Reqd._ oa-s
Check Accuracy of Legal DescrIption
Z
Review by Date
Existing Water Main Size
Water Main Required h11A
Service Line Required
HYdrant Size Existing
9
Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code Size
Detector Check Meter Reqd.
Cross Connection Inspection
F4
Fire Deparm-ent CoTirnents
"Water Yeter Charge Reqd.-"#�/el6l,
Review b Date
Septic Tank Design Approved );1119- Date
Septic Tank Permit Reqd. Permit No.
Sanitary Sewer Availabill't-V
L Proj.
Drawing No. File No.
Side Sewer Availabili /
Sanitary Sewer c nection Fee Reqd.
:3c
Review by—Z/L �X Date
Open Ditch Existing. Reqd.
Culvert Reqd. Size
9
Catch Basin Reqd. Indicate on Site Plan
0
Shoulder drainage maintain collection on swale open runoff
Manhole reqd. Indicate on Site Plan
Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked
Review by. Date
Revised: lvlO-1977
STREET FILE
DATE:
MEMO TO: Building Division
COr%nunity DCvCl0DmcnL Department
FROM: Engineering Division
Public Works Depart:r.-icnc
SUBJECT: 7
7"
Afcer'rev'iew of the su, . bjecc Building Pe'rmiC application, we-h
the following commen'
t S
Connection to City water system required.
2. 'C'onnection to City sanitary sewer system required.
3. Ripht,:-.of-wiv Pp'rm4 t reguired for at
1Y w)ri( on Ctry nrnnav-#-.
41 Driveway slo e not to exceeci 14%.
5. Backwater vnlve required if (j()jqnsUair,; p
1�g)111P, is below
elevation le.
6. Water and sewer lines to he separaCed hv 10 foot inimum.
t
16elz
/V"
0
-------------------
Signauur�e
UGET STREET FILE 0
WEST
CORA P.O. Box 669, Edmonds, Washington 98020 7 74.2 712
EDMONDS 20 UNIT CONDO
SITE COST ANALYSIS
November 3, 1982
1. Excavation and Demolition
2200 CY @ 3.50
2. Storm Water Retention System
210 LF 8" CMP @ 8.00
3 C.B. Type I @ 650-.00
1 C.B. Type II @ 1,100.00
3. Site Utilities.,�'-7.,',
Power vault and primary conduit
Side sewer - 6" 200 LF 0 8.00
11-1 is water service 230 LF @ 2.75
4. Pavi ng
Asphalt - 2" + 2" - 1300 SY @ 5.20
-- - Curbs--- 500 LF @ 1. 50
Striping -- - -- - - ---
/2'
$7,700-
$1 680-
1,950-
1,100-
$4,730- $4,730-
$1,020-
1 600-
632-
$3,252- $3,252-
$6,760-
750-
- -150-
$7,660- $7,660-
$23,342-
Commercial e Residential Developers
COMMERCIAL DES
TT& OF 'TRUSED-T-TaL
ASSOCIATES, C'. 7_7 71 17��
4230 198th Street SW S 6 ��: F-7 FE
LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036
(206) 771-2300
TO er fv�_s
I ALTIE Z3 . 23. a Z. I I.. ... I
TION
WE ARE SENDING YOU &Affached 0 Under separate cover via the following items'
0 Shop drawings 2Y-frints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
0 Copy of letter 0 Change order 0
COPI-ES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
La q
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
befor approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit -copies for approval
• For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit -copies for distribution
• As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return -corrected prints
0 For review and comment -o-"-zUk_M(1TED
0 FOR BIDS DUE 19-0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
SIGNED:
PRODUCT 240.2 Inc. Grub� Mm 01471. it enclosures are not as noted, kindiy notify us
2.
3.
STREET
FILE
Walken/Roti
2313 N. 172nd
Street
Seattle, WA
98133
206/365-9435
STORM DETENTION AND EROSION CONTROL FOR
LOT AT 520 PINE.,. EpOgLqPg, WngUINGTON'
NOTES:
These calculations are based an the King County "Storm
Drainage Control Requirements and.Guidelines - May 1979" by
the Department of Public Works - Hydraulic Division.
The rainfall - intensity curve -for Everett - North Bend has
been used.
Detention system designed for the 10 year storm.
WAZ
ART
16844
I
0 0
Walken/Roti
2313 N. 172nd Street
Seattle, WA 98133
206/365-9435
I. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site to be developed is located in Edmonds, Washington. The
site is 275' deep with 123' of frontage on both Forsyth Lane and
Pine Street. It is between 5th and 6th Avenues. The lot slopes
at 6 - 7% in a north westerly direction from Forsyth Lane toward
Pine Street.
The entire 123' x 2751 (33,825 S.F.) lot is covered with thick
grass and trees, with the exception of four buildings with an
area of 1,900 square feet.
The existing time of concentration (Tc) is composed of an initial
11wetting" time which is assumed to be 10 minutes for non -paved
sites plus a travel time from the most remote point. For a site
with a slope of 6-1/2% use of King County Chart 1 for lawns gives
a storm runoff velocity of about-t--�_2__FPS. Therefore
Tc = 10 + 300, 10 +. 4.2 =,_l_4--;-'2-'minutes
1.2 (60)
I =_l_e5�in/hr. (from Everett rainfall curve)
Cex. = (0. 20)(31925)+(0.90)(1900) = 0.239
33.825
2
'fob
0
Walken/Roti
2313 N. 172nd Street
Seattle, WA 98133
206/365-9435
Total Area = A 123 x 275 = 0.78-Acres
1. & .7-9-1
0 CIA = (0.239) (.78) = 0..280 cfs
ex.
, zC) I
0.2-8or cfs
allowable ex
II. FUTURE CONDITIONS
The site will be developed into a 20-unit condominium. It will
be significantly landscaped with trees and schrubs (C=O.-I-0).
From the grading and storm drainage plan we measure the roofed or
paved areas and landscaped areas to be as follows:
115 . Oz-/
Landscape: 0. 18 Acres @ Ol.-I-6,= 'e-re-
Roof, Paving: 0.60 Acres @ 0.90 = .540-"
-7
-558-
,567
C(Future) = 0.-951a— ..7�5'.-77-7
.78
0
Walken/Roti
2313 N. 172nd Street
Seattle, WA 98133
206/365-9435
III. REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME
'
Q allowable --0.-2-80-
Total Acreage (C Future) (.78H,-7-1-5i
7Z 7
-!5 7-4-
_j�:.r-50Z c f s
Ac. C
Since orifice outlet condition applies from Table 2 of the King
I
County manual for a 10 year storm with orifice outlet control
T (Min.) 25 + 2 13
& Vs(FT / Ac) = 3607T - 40 Q.T
'R'Qo T + 25
Substituting we have
- 4o - (a I(P
T = -25 4+7225-- A2-.0-23 minutes and
.,2
.502
40-4,16 .5-z4- 40.61(-
Vs = 3607.(4-2-.023) 40 (-5021 (42-.--e23-)
A-2vO23 + 25
40 -Q�
1-30I.-So 3
Vs = 2261.559 - 843.814 = q-4-1-7-;-T45- FT
Ac
-7S3.5-7
Vt = Vs (Acreage) (C-Future) = 7-ffl- C.F.
0
4
Walken/Roti
2313 N. 172nd Street
Seattle, WA 98133
206/365-9435
IV. STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED
From the grading and drainage plan the water level at maximum
ponding level is 144.6. The maximum ponding depth is at C.B. #3
and is 144.6 - 144.1 or 0.50'. Surface area at maximum ponding
I I a Y':5 I= 3658
is:j-p---Z-20 S.F. Using the average end area method of volume
calculation the storm runoff stored in the parking lot is
calculated to be:
365:9
V = -A- x Depth X 0.50'
2 2
-c) 14.5
V (Max. above ground storage)
In addition to this surface storage ther.e will be detention in
the 8" pipe between C.B. #4 and the control C.B (C.B. #2) and
the control basin itself.
Vol G" pipe D x (Pipe Length)
4
x 160' = 56 C. F.
4
Walken/Roti
2313 N. 172nd Street
Seattle, WA 98133
206/365-9435
7-
Vol in control mh Irr (depth)
(2.2) (144.-6 140.4) = 53 C.F.
Storage provided = 930 + 56 + 53 = 1039 C.F.
This is well in excess of the 791 C.F. required.
V. ORIFICE SIZE
144.6 - 140.4 = 4.2'
From King Co. Hydraulic
Manual:
- 6? Rllpwoble
Area Orifice
P"
Walken/Roti
2313 N. 172nd Street
Seattle, WA 98133
206/365-9435
.7-97 '0,191 2-
A 0.-28-67 cf s ..0-2-7-460- f t
0. 62
tq,
Dia Ift_ = 0.186984 ft
2.-31
2.24 inches
or 2-1/4" dia.
VI. PIPING SIZE
King County regs require the discharge pipe downstream of the
flow restrictor orifice to carry the 25 year design storm.
C I A (0.715)(3.1)(0.78) (Assumed worst case,
25 yr 25
1.73 CFS i.e. Tc=5min)
From nomograph the minimum slope of an 8" helical alumin (n=.012)
to carry 1.73 is 0.017 oLl+itt.
W/R:Ed/Condo.cal
7
STREET FILE
July 15, 1982
MEMO TO: Hal Reeves
Building Official
FROM: Gary L. McComas
Fire Marshal
SUBJECT: EDMONDS TWENTY UNIT BUILDING; 520 PINE AND
577 FORSYTH LANE
After review of the attached plans, the fire department has
the following requirements:
1. Single station smoke detectors must be provided
in each unit.
2. Fire extinguishers must be located throughout the
buildings as indicated on the approved print.
Minimum rating is a 5 lb. dry chemical type with
a rating of 2;A-10,B:C.
3. All unit doors must be 20 minute listed doors
and frame assemblies. They must also be self -
closing.
4. Exit signs must be provided.
5. Interior finish shall be Class A in all vertical
exits and Class A or B in all exit access, lobbies
and corridors-.
GLM: b e
I -ET FILE
May 27, 1982
MEMO TO: �Architectural Design Board
FROM: Dan Smith
Planning/Engineering�
Inspector
SUBJECT: JUNE 2, 1982-ADB MEETING
ADB-19-82 BICKFORD STEAKS
No comment.
ADB-25-82 CROSS ENTERPRISES INC.
No comment.
ADB-20-82 COMMERCIAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES
The requirements are as follows:
a) Extend curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement to east
property line of Pine Street.
b) Obtain approved utility development plan from
Engineering prior to issuance of the building permit.
c). Obtain the proper permits in conjunction with the
development of the property.,
ADB-21-82 STEIN SCHOOL
Due to the unsafe�
.nature of the access from the school
parking lot onto 2b8th,' only one curb cut will be
allowed. This.should be at the far west side.of the
property. The'gra-vel, parking lot is approve"d,`however,
20' of asphalt pav'ing.',back from the edge'of the 208th
Street shall be'r�quirk. The own'
er is also required to
sign a "waiver.of protest" form for a' future L'I.D. on
local streets. The applicant shall be required' to get a
right-of-way construction permit in conjunction with the
paving -of the driveway aprons.
ADB-22-82 STOP-N-SOCK
Th ere shall be a 20' asphalt apr'on between the gravel
parking lot and -the 238th pavement. A right-of-way
construction permit is required.
I NTER-OFFICE COMMU N ICATIONS'-
DATE! May 13, 19 82
TO FROM Planning Departmen t
)ector`�-,_
4n,-'PTa—nning/Engineering Ins�
ASR FORM 141
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ADB-20-82/COMMERCIAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES
Attached -are the site, landscape.and elevations of a'20.unit condominium
at 520 Pine Street.
The ADB hearing will be'June 2, 1982, please submit your comments to
Hank Lewis before May 26, 1982.
a
...........
. ........ .
'�j
.....
.....
.............
A"
Xv.-K.: X.
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICATION
to the
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
It
npiEET
MeTE May 10982 FILE # _,4A9-7_0-8 2--
SITE PLAN . x
BUILDING PLANS (3):.ELEVATIONS x
LANDSCAPE PLAN x
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA X RECEIPT #
SIGN EXHIBITS FEE RECPT #
PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER:
HEARING DATE (0
OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE Commercial Design Associates, Inc. —PHONE 771-2300
ADDRESS 4230 198th Street Southwest, Lynnwood, Washingj&IP CODE 98036
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Commercial Design Associates, Inc. —PHONE 771-2300
PROPERTY ADDRESS— 520 Pine Street RM 1.5
LEGAL DESCRIPTION- See Attachment
PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
1.
2.
3.
Building Plans - Preliminary
Final x
Site Plan x Landscape Plan x Elevations x
Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan
Modificationn
,,of previous approval
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY One single family residence
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 20 condominium residences with required Qarking
APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT June 1
ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK October 1982
RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in
consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and
hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages,
including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever
such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete
information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees.
PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The
mission for public officials and the staff
property for the purpose of inspection and
undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per -
of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject
posting attendant to this application.
gnature 61 Applican
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EDMONDS 20 UNIT
All that portion of the west half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as
follows:
Beginning 145.50 feet east and 60 feet south of the northwest corner
of said west half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;
thence south 300 feet; thence east 123 feet; thence north 300 feet;
thence west along county road 123 feet to point of beginning; except
the south 25 feet as conveyed to City of Edmonds under Auditor's file
No. 2091286
F N RCIAL
N �bVCIATES
4230�98thSTPEET LYNNWOOD, WASH 11\1(—�ZTON 9803 6
May 10, 1982
City of Edmonds
Planning Department
Civic Center
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Re: Edmonds 20 Unit
Dan Smith:
0, STREET FIL'-E
.K�CEIVED
M AY 1 ?, 19 8 2
�Cjjy OF �DMQNQS
77�-2300
This is to confirm our telephone conversation of May 10, 1982 requesting con - '
firmation of the existance or non-existance of an L.I.D. with the property
described below.
All that.portion of the west half of the Southwest
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section'25,
Twonship 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as
follows:
Beginning 145-50 feet east and 60 feet south of the
northwest corner of said west half of the Southwest
Quarter.of the Northwest Quarter; thence south 300
feet; thence east 123 feet; thence north 300 feet;
thence west along county road 123 feet to point of
beginning; except the south 25 feet as conveyed to
City of Edmonds under A�ditor's file No. 2091286.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Acce'Breenin
COMMERCIAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
kl
APPLICATION CARD No.
.................... .......
for
—00 -.0F EDMONDS
The city of Edmonds SIODE SEWER PERMT j�Xgl-�MENT No . .......... I...-..
OUTSIDE El INSIDE 0 REPAIRS 0
PERMIT No.
-Kyll":> A C-POR .......................
.Ovvllrm ..... .. . ................... --- - ----- . . .......................
........ --------
..................
Q.
. .. .......
STREET
AVENUE 0 . ........................
HOUSE No .. ....
% . .......
NAMEADD .. ..................................
................ BLOCK NO . ...............................................
............................................................................... .......
w
T
7 IV 7H
7-J
Approved:
Date
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................... DEPOSIT, $ ................ . ...................... ......... . . .........
DATE............... . ............................ By ......
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ------------------------------- - ---------
Aiw_ S, U-1c
CITY OF 7n" 'ET FILFROJEAME Edmonds 20 Unit
ENVIR014MENTAL ASSESSMENT DATE SUBIMITTED -May 12,1982
The information on this form will be used to determine the effect of your action upon the
environment of the City of Edmonds. Please answer each question as thoroughly as possible.
Area -3-3,825 sq.ft. Soils Type Limitations
Description of topography (4% slope) 7% slope from S.E. corner to N.W. corner of
property. NOTE: If grading or filling will'
GradiAg: Estimated cubic yards 1700 cu. yds. exceed 500 cubic yards a grAding
and filling plan must be sub -
Filling: Estimated cubic yards mitted with the application.
Estimated area to be paved (including buildings) 24,525 sq. ft.
Estimated area in open space (pervious surface) 9,300 sq. ft.
2. EAT E R
Strearr. Estimated flow (cubic feet per second) N/A
Will stream be altered? if yes, to what degree?
—Other water bodies?
Impact on storm drainage Method of handling runoff retention on site
AdjaCent to shorelines zone? No Within 200 feet of MHHW?_ Nn
3. VEGETATICt';
Type and approximate number of trees 6-8 6" diameter fruit trees
Minimum diameter of trees to remain % of trees to be removed
Ground cover % to be removed
Proposed landscaping, if an 9300 sq. ft.
4. EXIST114G LA14D USE WITHIN 300 FEET RADIUS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
Single Multi --
Vacant Family Family Commercial Other
,North A X
-South X X
East X
-West X
5. CIRCULATION
Estimated increase in auto trips daily, 900%
Availability of public transportation Yes
6. AREA OF IMPACT
Neighborhood X City-wide Regional
7. EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY— Additional automobile emissions
8. CHANGES IN NOISE GENERATION Additinn-al antnmnhilp traffir
11/78)
4* STRFE-1, FILE
ENVIRONME14TAL CHECKLIST
Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of
1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local
governmental agencies to consider environmental values
both for their own actions and when licensing private
proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions
significantly affecting the quality Of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies
involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a
rdajor action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as
you can with the information available to you. Where
explanations of your answers are required, or where you
believe an explanation would be helpful to goveriiment
decision makers, include your explanation in the space
provided, or use additional pages. *You should include
references to any reports or studies of which you are
aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide.
Complete answers to those questions now will help all
agencies involved undertake the required environmental
review without unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal,
not just to the permit for which you are currently
applying or the proposal for which approval is sou'aht.
0
Your answers should include the impacts that will be
caused by your proposal when it is completed, even
though completion may -not ' occur until sometime in the
future. This will allow all agencies.involved to complete
their environmental review now, without duplicating
paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state
and local agencies in the State of Washington for various
types of proposals. Many of the uestions may not apply
to your proposal. If a question 2oes not apply, just
answer it "not-applicable".(N/A) an'd continue on to the
next question.
0 EN VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent-- Richard Slye.
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent
Diamond Head Drive, Honolulu, Hawai
3. Date Checklist Submitted May 12, 1982
4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Edmonds
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Edmonds Twenty Unit
6. Nature and Brief Description of'Proposal (including but not limited to
its size, general -design elements, and other fac - tors that will give an
accurate understanding of its scope and'nature:
20 unit condominium with garage parkinq for 20 vehicles and 20 outside
spaces, two elevators, stucco and cedar sidiig.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected -by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate u . nder-
standing of the environmental setting of the pro . posal): .
he site —is 123 fee . t on the north A snuth aid 27.5.fPet on the-east—aad
n existing single
—is plan:Led primarily in lawn with s ouie. -, ma 1 l_fnujt_trees___The_nDr1h_
and south property line is bounded by city St
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal___qct.ober 8,, 1 �82
9. List of . all Permits, Licenses, or Government Ap ' provals Required for all
Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones):
Architectural Design Board Demolitiol Permit
—Building Permit Mechanical Permit
Grading Permit Electrical Permit
Side Sewer Permit
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further
activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain.
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the proper . ty covered
by your proposal? If yes, explain.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the
proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at
some future date,.destribe the nature of such application form:
Architectural Design Board, Edmonds, Washington
-1- - I
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required).
YES MAYBE NO
.1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes
in geologic substructures?
X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil?
X
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features.?. X
d. The destruction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or physical
features?
X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
X
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel or a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
lake?
X
Explanation: (c) Minimal as required to allow for required
plan)
parking (see site
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of
ambient air,quality?
X
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
X
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
X
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:,
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and -amount of sur-
face water runoff? X
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
c. Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?-
X
d. Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body? X
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in
any alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,.
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
f. Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters? X
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct additions
or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
h. Deterioration in ground water quality,
either through direct injection, or through
the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter-
gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or
other substances into the ground waters? X
i-. Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water
supplies? X
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of flora (in-
cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops,
microflora and aquatic plants)? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of flora? X
c. Introduction of new species of
flora into anarea, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of exist-
- ing species? -
X
d. Recution in acreage of any agri-
cultural crop? X
Explanation: (a)' Removal of majority of existing grass and trees. but will
re -Plant as per landscape requirements �see plan for pro Posal).
-3-
El
Re MAYBE
NO
S. rauna. WIll the proposal result in:
a. - Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of fauna (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
b. Red.uction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of fauna?
c. Introduction of new species of
fauna into an area, or result in a
barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
r1l
X
X
Explanation:-
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase
existing noise levels? X
Explanation: — Noise will be generated primarily from -car movement. Thp car tisp
for this site is within existing road desiqn standards a d 7nning rprommpndatinns.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal X
produce new 11�ht or glare?
Explanation: — Increase in -living units will produce more light but no glarp will
be produced.-
B. Land Use. Will the proposal result
Tn —the alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Explanation:_
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resource? ..
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
Explanation:
X
-4-
MAYBE NO
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
a risk of -an explosion or release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset condi-
tions?
Explanation:
X -
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area? X
Explanation:_ Increased density, allowable under present zoning codes.
12.
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
Explanation:
KI
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro-
posal result in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X
b. Effects on existing parking fac*.ili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X
c. Impact upon existing transportation
systems? X
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people and/or
goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or X
air traffic? -
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -X—
Explanation:. Increased population- density will produce m re vehicular tr&ffjc--
-5-
YEIP MAYBE NO
Public Services. Will the proposal have
an effect.upon, . or result in a need for
new or altered governmental services in
any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? '
b. Police protection?'
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X
b. Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? -X
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in
.a neeFfor new systems or alterations to
the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
�11
—XI
—X
X
X
X
-6-
49
Human Health. Will the proposal result
in the creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Explanation:
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal. result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or quan-
tity of existing recreational oppor-
tunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological/Historical-. Will the
proposal result in an alteration of
a significant archeologicalor his-
torical site, structure, object or
building?
Explanation:
4D
YES MAYBE NO
F11.
U
M
X
C.- SIGNATURE
1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration
or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there
be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack/of full diyclosure on my part'.
PROPONENT:
-7-
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
SYMBOL
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
QUANJ SIZE
LANDSCAPE -ROCKS
2 - 3 MAX
COTTONEASTER SELDON
JULIAN BARBERRY
1 GALLON
PINUS MONTANA MUGHUS
MUGHO PINE
PYRAMIDALIS
3' HIGH
ACER CIRCINATUM
VINE MAPLE
41-6" HIGH
RHODODENDRON - VARIETY
VIBENUM TI-NUS
LAURESTINUS VIBURNUM
PHOTINA FRASERI
PHOTINIA
241; 36"
CAMELLIA JAPONICA-
CAMELLIA
GAULTHERIA SHALLOW
SALAL
GALLUNA VULGARIS - VAR
'HEDERA
HEATHER
1 GALLON AT
HELIX - VAR
ENGLISH IVY
241, O/c
PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESI
SHORE PINE DOUG FIR
SOD
NOTES: 1. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER AS SPECIFIED ABOVE.
2. ALL AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 2" GARDEN BARK.
3. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO HAVE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION,
4. ALL TREES TO BE STAKED.
z� (I r,
a- c
r�j
LL.
x 1:!�-n
-77 v
00
Cl)
-The -City of Edmonds
::Zl C7,
OWNER ....
HOUSE No....
R 0 V E D
LLJ
ULI
c/)
M
Date
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ..........................
SEWER WORK ()M-MIP T4,-qTTV.T-)
APPLICATION CARD No . ..................
for
SIDE SEWER pERmT
OUTSIDE 0 INSIDE REPAIRS C] EASEMENT No . .............................
I -el ......................... CONTRACTOR . .. ........ 0-0-
.... Z� .... ............. ��.: .................... PERMIT No.
STRFMr (7
..................................... AVENUE :� 0 . ...................................................................... BLOCK No . ........................... ...................
NAMEADD . ........................................................................................................................... . .................................
Al�
/IV C""L w
T H
/V wx
7 IV :F
7 4
Approved:
DEPOSIT, $ ............................ ................
A "ILI
1�
I- .
fr: r
ST ri c -:�.
BUILDING ADDRES
7: 11 sk
.j.:-ARW
Single Family
BUILDING PERMIT REVIE�;* _,7-'Mu-1-t ip 1 e
-/� , � -C ") Commercial
BLDG. DEPT. SUSPENSE DATE
I
' .
I NITIAL DATE
OFFICE' ADMIN.' PUBLIC WORKS LOG IN
CITY.ENGINEER (check)
0 Access Slope and Vehicle Access
1
5kDr'ainage Plan
El Street File
OLegal Description
[:]Quit Claim
[JEasement
ate .�bw6r. Connect ion
EIWATERI.SEWER
DIVISION
Meter Size M2
Complete" Bui 1 ding Permit Review
STREET DIVISION
omp�le t e �Building Permit' Review
OOFFICE ADMIN', LOG OUT TO' BLDG-.-'.DEPT.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[]--BUILDI G PERMIT APPLICATION (COMPLETE). j2
W2 COPIES OF SITE PLAN ;,7j
2 COPIES OF FIRE PROTECTION PLAN
:(PREVIOUSLY 'REVIEWED BY FIRE DEPT.')
I 3-3'-COPIES OF DRAINAGE PLAN 14ITH CALCULATIONS
REQUIRED BY SUBDIVISION 0
GREATER THAN 2,000 SQ. FT.
IMPERMEABLE SURFACE 13
LESS THAN 2,000 SO. FT. [3
HECK ZONING.'REQUIREMENTS (SETBACKS)'
PC COPY OF ENGINEERI14G CHECK LIST
OPY OF PUBLIC'.'WORKS MEMO
MM,ULTIP''LE OR* COMMERCIAL
YES M(ATrAcHmpy oFADB ApPRovAL:INcL,:ALL Dp
AjTINGs)
No
13 SUBDIVISION YES[] NAME.*
DATED RECORDED ---
NUMBER
NO 0 (ATEACH.-COPY'OF:
gECK SEWER DRAWING AND ATTACH COPY
ips DE . DICATIQN REQU I IRED YESQ (OBTAIN QUIT CIAIto
CITY CODE .
NO,&
DOES CITY HAVE EASEMENT ON PROPERTY
YES (ATTACH COPIES OF DRAWINGS)
No
Z'CHECK LEGAL ACCESS' INGRE
,SOO UTILITIESO
YES-0 YESea
NO [] NO
.HAS SEWER ASSESSMENT BEEN PAID
YES L. I. D. NO.
PLAT NO.
SUBDIVISION
77-
0 IF' MULTIPLE: *.INCLUDE NUMBER OF UNITS-...
0IF.C*OMMERCIAL:I'NCLUDE NUMBER OF FIXTURE UNITS
& -,17 n
=::m j OFET
FILE
USE PERM. -
CITY OF EbMONDS
ZONE NUMBER
V
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
joB
NAME (OF; NAME OF BUSINESS)
ADDRESS 51;� 7 Pg,44�Za,-L�
Richard Slye
CE-GAL DESCRIPTION CHECKI SUBDIVISION Nof. LID NO�
cc
Uj MAILING ADDRESS
Z
3:
Diamond Head Drive
0
CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP.
Honolulu, Hawaii 1774-8876 (206)
EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION C7
NAME
PROPOSED
Commercial Design Associates-, Inc.
RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED
M
W
WU ADDRESS
STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED 0
L
ZU
4230 198th Street Southwest
L)
SEE ENGINEERING MEMO OAT
Z
W
cc
< CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER
SEE PIW DEPT. REVIEW CHECK LIST DATED
Lynnwood, WA 98036 771-2300
NAME
REMARKS
Puget West
a: ADDRESS
0
P.O. Box 669
METIJA SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY VE FIXTURE UNITS
0
<
cc CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER
Cc
W
Z
0 Edmonds, WA 98020 774-8876
REMARKS
STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER
PUGETWC187KG
SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW
ADB NO.
Legal Description of Property - include ail easements
ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT
(show below or attach four copies)
SHORELINE#
Z
cr
See Attachment
VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY
DATE
YARDS LOT COVERAGE
FRONT SIDE RIA71
Z
Z
REMARKS
r7u
NEW L�J RESIDENTIAL
PLUMBING
ADD/ALTER 0 NON-RESIDENTIAL
MECHANICAL
0 REPAIR E] RETAINING WALL
SIGN
EXCAVATE
FENCE
CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT
DEMOLISH OR FILL
( - x FT)
I I
PRE -MOVE INSPJ
COMPLIANCE INSP.
SWIM
POOL
SPECIAL INSPFCTOR JOCCUPANCY OCCUPANT
REQUIRED GROUP LOAD
El SIDE SEWER WATER LINE
Ul YES I!NO
REMARKS
Z
NUMBER OF STORIE NUMBERO
DWELLING
Two UNITS
10
NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN)
Construct a ten unit condominium
PLAN CHECK FEE
BUILDING
PLUMBING
MECHANICAL
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY.
GRADINGIFILL
Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks,
driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.
Permit Application: 180 Days
Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days
"Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and
o successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
'U3 harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials,
m employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
a:
< whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance
of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
0
3: nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinan ce
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
provision."
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the
information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly
ATTENTION
authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and
THIS PERMIT
state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz-
AUTHORIZES
ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor
ONLY THE
Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa-
WORK NOTED
tio Insurancq.
ign
INSPECTION
SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT) DATE SIGNED
DEPARTMENT
— - - - - - CITY OF
THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE Cl Y EDMONDS
OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX 775-2525
VALUATION
APPLICATION APPROVAL
This application is not a permit until
signed by the Building Official or his
Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is
acknowledged in space provided.
OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE
DATE
Ili 1114 ZaNUULL) tit CODED 31.04.
-IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE
T,i�'�,,,UNTIL A:FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector
i.CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC
i',t,v',C,HAPTER *3. JUL 91982 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor
E 9-9-