530 DAYTON ST.PDFiiiiiiiiiiiiii
10819
530 DAYTON ST
7Z
t
VVIS
N�QJVS a-4,4
-STR
FIL E-
Z&,O-f A-1
- 7tle-,.F,7z
e-r
. ..... U4
0 1-
1�0-7
CA�,,
7A- V"
Cc-
(!A- dZ
b&4f� ALL
05
OLIW- `ZU4 ',A I
0�7
4A-'4
vor Vn'
, o7
oel.
10- V V- --7
'I/
40-02-0 ep
(" t114,
NE
W� Ay it 1924�
jSGIfAEER-'t-'%
"ARBA
i2 �q
KI
9803#
1,9X,41
07
I
o
c-7 )3/ 1"&-
Cd6'ea,z-�, d4wrlv,
Val
0- 0-
ADDRESS:
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBERLUL200n- 10/pa' 1020Qk1f)o;ZQ2QQj-3QtQQ
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE,):2-Q=a2
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS:ED- I ag ocno DETERMINATION: [-] Conditionat Waiver
Study Required gaWaiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: huo un
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:9"2S'n9-,Wi2-mo, to*,si,,o]
I I
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
p!
HIT
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: IZOIS601
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:
SHORT PLAT
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:- A-1 0 1 Z' 01
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
LOT:
BLOCK:
L:\TEMP\DSrs\Foffns\Street File Checklist.doe
LOCATE REQUEST NUM13ER
�ATES
DATE CALLED:
UEMAN/CREW FUTURE SERVICE: NO
I
VRVIENTS -
BORE: CUT:
kWING 9
LOCK- DATE:
10/910—
A UNLOCK--'-) INITIAL:
- 6 -
�xo
L I
ACCOUNT:
rER SHOP
ROUTE / SEQUENCE
SUPPLIER:
TREATMENT PLANT
ZEMAN
E B. L T.
LITY
SIZE LOCK 0
LING
RESIDENTIAL UNLOCKED)p,
APARTMENT UNITS
OFFICE UNITS
COMMERCIAL UNITS
SPRINKLER
OTHER
LOCATE REQUEST NUM13ER
LOCATES'.
DATE CALLED:
FOREMAN/CREW FUTURE SERVICE." NO
COMMENTS
DRAWING BORE: CLJT:,"'-
LOCK- DATE: /l/-7/63
INITIAL:
I ACCOUNT: 61, —6 z 4
METER SHOP I ROUTE /SEOUENCE/::,t*-i I —
= c [0) 9 tj kyj 0 Q%
UTILITY p
BILLING
SUPPLIER:
TREATMENTPLANT wow f.
-2 15- L F ow L
SIlE5/-tp3/4" A 4�' LOCK 0
RESIDENTIAL
APARTMENT
OFFICE
COMMERCIAL
SPREqKLERF I RG, L,
OTHER
UNLOCKEDIN
UNITS
UNITS
UNITS
CiCif Edmonds - Wat ' er Depauleht
TAP CAM,
NOSS84-
eter Size Reading. 00 0 D
-MPL
fgrs. style 560-SU-S I-R4
irchaser: INC,
!rv. Add. S30 -DAjT'Ov,.i i&-r.
Iling Address:
ime MICkLL. C_DtQST(ZkJC_-TIGw
reet'-7 9 0 '7 9- 1
ty 0^6 "05
ite:
--ter Si . ze�/89'4 K 4�'F L
)nnection $
-eet Cut $
Aer Location
INC,
Sul -tz-, K) 2-
9602-C.,
Pt:
Permit #
OrztJ(C T(ZPL \/Aut-:T
I I _jk
rvice Material:
essure lbs. GPI
ite.of Work By:
oj. No:
i !marks:R-P,'-
CV�'of Edmonds - Water Depa-'_'ient
TAP CARD
Meter No. eadin : OCOOC'
9
Size
Mfgrs. No6L5__24(0_7 -7) Style&t��-5 S r<
Purchaser:
S erv. Add. 6E' S Dn -j7 o" Sa-
Billing Address:
Name (4k 2S79X-Z/O A) /AZ
S 7?
treet 07-24(0116�.. 5/.A/. 5fe. -0/,0,?
'-City
Date: Receipt:
Meter S ze: Meter$
Connection $ �4 5
Street Cut $ Permit #
Meter Location E OF DIZ WC-,
Service Material:
I/Z,%(
P C—,
Pressure lbs.
GPM
Date of Work O/A/03
By:"j0=*
Proj. No:
Remarks:
I
'I? C. is(),)
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwxi.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
September 16, 2003
Dwight McGrew
Michel Construction, Inc.
7907 212"' Street SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
RE: Request to Deviate from Approved Access Width at 530 Dayton Street
(Building Permit # 2003-0230)
Dear Dwight:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
Upon receipt of your letter dated Sept. 9, 2003, 1 reviewed the approved civil drawings for this site and
compared the drawings to your request to deviate from the approved width. Based on my site visit and
review of the drawings, it is quite apparent major changes occurred between the approved drawings and
what was installed. I believe the situation you now face could have been avoided had the changes been
submitted for review and approval before they were constructed.
It has long been our standing requirement that approach entry widths for multi -family or commercial
buildings be a minimum of 24 feet to allow safer and easier access to and from the site. In addition, it
reduces the accident potential On City streets. Based on the site conditions noted, it would be more
practical to approve a deviation from the approved plans than to move the fire hydrant, double detector
check valve assembly and possibly the rockery to meet the 24 foot width requirement. Since the approach
to the entrance of the garage is so restrictive due to the location of the hydrant, fire line vault and rockery,
your request for a 20 foot,wide driveway entrance is approved.
Please be advised this is a one-time approval and does not set a precedence for similar future construction.
Minimum two-way driveway widths for multi -family and commercial shall 'remain at 24 feet. If
situations arise where major changes may or will happen, please submit the proposed revisions for
approval before proceeding with construction.
V12Sincerel
D K. GEBERT, PE
City Engineer
DKG/cmc
STREET FILE
�5,rw �L&
Wletters\rnichel- dw deviation 530 dayton.doc Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
09/05/2003 17:14 4257789086
MICHEL CUN��l
HEL
T10N,, INC.
Sept. 9, 2003
David Gebert, 15enior Engineer
Engineering Dept.
City of Edmonds
250 5th Avenue North
Edmond,s, Wa!�hington 98020
I)t?.ar Mi. (;ebert,
RECEIVED
SEP 10 2003
ENCANEERING DIVISION
Re: BUildillg Permit # 2002-0230
[.vie hns probabiv already L'old VoLl that We have rUll into some problems
for the (,I)lyzince to the parking gnri)ge ®R 530 Diiyton Street. Our Original ()ill tile
d (,�� i I door coming fr
. gned width of 25' include.t.1 a 3' walkway to the m, i)
vroge. Wt, h(lve eliminated this width by providinga linding that connects till.
tile llew driveway. This leave, -, vith i 22'required Avidth Of W Ich
havc 20'.
(2). X'VL' ll()%A' have a 20' width as a re',Lllt Of d(?CiSi0l)S n)"ide b\ the Fire Dept. and
]"Lil)llc W(irks to move the Hydrant Assembly 18., to) tile East (Instead of 3' to the
West per Lyle And Our original plan, -,ee. enclosed corrections).
Iriveway width �,o
(3).Wie. are asking for a departure frorn tile code to allow a 20' L I
that we. d(m.'t have to move the new fire hydrant. The reqUired ivitith fnr a 5-9
lOt S1.1hilivision(potential of 3-car garages plus, drive and curb parking) is O)ilv 20'.
The pirkin�; garage at 530 Dayton has parking for 2 cars per unit which is a
1111JXiMUM Of 10. A 9-10t SUbdi'Vision wolilLi h,-t%re a ininli-nUrn of 3 car,,� per lot
w1iich is 27.
(4).1 ',)ppreciate ill advance yovi're understanding of thi's reqLle,,,-t ill order to
expedite the completion of the 5idewalk and Our Building Permit.
If YOU hive. any further question,,; please call.
Thank )101.1,
Dwig lcGrew
)*'�4
Project Manager
Michel Construction Inc.
7907 - 212TH SW, 0102 - EDMONDS, WA 9.0026 - (425) 779-2211 - FAX (425) . 778-9OaG I DMICHEC106103
013/ 09/ 2003 17: 14 4257789086 MICHEL UUNbl F H�;JL_ I (dd
L)EC-21-2001 IG:39 4257, ?1012'r_ P. 06.,'07
City of.Edmonds
Plan Review Corrections
Plan Check#* 01-400 Date- 19 I)ecember . .2001
Project Name/Address: 560 Payton $t
Contact Pars on/Add rese/Fax'.
Reviewer: Lyle Chrisman, Developmg apartment: EngingeEing-
The subject applicaii . on has been reviewed, however we cannot complete our review until the
following Items have been corrected or addressed. Please resubmit 3 copies of the revised drawings
to the Development Services Coordinators.
$HEET 1
-�1. Existing wa . ter main is 12" c.l,p. and sewer main is 10".
2., In ' appe �-��n.
3. Xre the catch basins in the alley new or existing? is storm line along W. property line new or
existing?
4. Provirie 0Ip8_S4QPJ.-1, -af-cbsl7rThr-al ley. e on Dayton St.
5. Install scatch basin where existing 8" pvc line connects to storm lin
6. How much cover will there be between* the proposed rockery and the storm pipe along the West
side of the property? — 1 *4,C4 140c.4-J e property line.
7. Show now side sewer location,gF2de, and locking lamphole cover at th C.
8. Relocate fire hydrant a minimum of 3'to the West of its current location. — 'elt 00
9. Add trough drain and connect to tightline.
10. Indicate width of driveway entrance width.
11. Indicate the installation of the following for the new domestic and fire lines. The 12" valves should
be placed on the outside of the 2" and 4" lines.
a. 1-12"X^2" tPfl (for water service)
b. 1-112"Wtee (fire line)
c. 2-12" resilient gate valves
d. 14" resilient gate valve
e. 1-2" resilient gate valve.-
12. Show location of FDC and -post indicator valve.
13. Show location of garage floor drain/oil sepgrator, and how itponnects, to the building side sewer.
InS611's check valve between i�e_ -side seweri1ne and floor drain to eliminate sewer odors and the
'potential for sewer back up onto the garage floor.
14.The minimum size of the iresh should be 10'x 12'
DATE FAXED. (Attach fax transmittal) PAGE OF
��EdniandilWA7AkUSERS�chrismmld-F,Abwg�01 A00A oc
09/09/2003 17:14 4257789061��
MiUHLL UUNbf
to
r-Huc- U-4
525
Qp.
TYFE
I I
uj
I
N5TALL
N OTE
zz
IF NECE55API
PAM�
IDEN-
5<-
LU
LU
0
TO F,
jPK
�S)
I - I
NEW F.H.
MISS
or
#�
Immm
WOMEN
"PIPAP
WHEEL
5T05
ra M-1-Armal'o'b'111w
09/0q,/2003 .17:14 4257789086
MICHEL
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
7907 212TH ST. SW' '#102
EDMONDS, WA 98026
PHONE (425)776-2211
FAX # (425) 778-9086
MiUHLL WNbl
I "�" -
-FAX.
RECEIVED
SE P� 10 2003
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TO:_Z�W- DATE:
v
FROM:
REGARDING:
ORIGINAL TO BE MAILED: YES N
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE,
a micmccloolols
41
4
RETURN ADDRESS:
CONFORMED COPY
5"t�
City of Edmonds, City Clerk 200204150809
1215"' Avenue North 04/15/2002 03:18 PM Snohomish
Edmonds, WA 98020 P-0002 RECORDED County
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MUTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Reference'#:
Grantor:. MICHEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Grantee:- City of Edmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec R41 Twn_c9_j_Rng ;?2 Q tr6:&-)_
OR Lot 12 & 13 -Block 121 Plat 'EDMONDS
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 00434212101000
(2)
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not. yet assigned
WHEREAS, MICHEL. CONSTRUCTION, iNc.
is the owner of tlie following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit:
Property Address: 530 Dayton Street
Legal Description:— The East 10 feet of lot 10 and all lots It. 12, 13 in block 121 of City
of Edmonds, according to Dlat recorded in Volume 2 of Plats at pages 39 Snohomish Count�.
Washington
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
City of Edmonds
B y: J 9,1M /� Date 41IIAO
Page Z of , /, —
WHEREAS, the'above named owner is desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant
upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community
Development Code. WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the premises, the above
named owner does hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following
restrictive covenant, to -wit:
That at the ' time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the
Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may
be erected on subject property containing more than six units.
Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their
heirs, successors and assigns.
RIG
DATED this day of 40V
2001
IL
GRANTOR
State of Wash) hrbif
)ss
County of 54�hm'-:5)m
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and
acknowledged it as the���� (title) of ./h iLgEi_ T-;,OA)
(name of party on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be the free and voluntary act
of such party for the uses and purposes mentions in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to
before me this- -Ze _C:0— —day of 20 0 1
e
Notary Public in and for the Sta4A Washington.
My commission expires — /0 —0 !1
AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
City of Edmonds
Byl&i�iDate e
Page_ A of__49"L_
NOH D. B r u ce, P. E. Eng 1 n PHOt 1E 1-10. _206 546 34410 Jan. 14 2002� P1
Dennis M. -Bruce, RE. Tk�jj ;L0 0
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geolechnical /Civil Engineer
$Axe 457�_ S_ u4j(T —T
-
V-Q F0 T F
L 0
\j
�_VA At
�tT WkLU-�-
N,DQ, C-a a00 r�_)
S-rPtBLC- ArT
4CT(\JEr P�_1ESSUkE �-S"
0j s PI�r e- Tc
4A I JOV -rife- r,6M.0dkA-$ A CA,
WA I- L
AJUM 6_p
71
A+4X I& (k *J 61-
IN ak
jwSp_t;—_c-rj0fj -ey
0a _r�"s
I'; --
I ,XPfRES_. 12/2N:5
k
67A11Fw5r0jr
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS �PPMENT - INSPECTION # DRAINAGE , DESIGNS PERMIT - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-84B ECEIVED
STREET FILE
FEB - 1 2002
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
RV.011 : D. Bruce, P. E. En-9 i t" PHOHE HO. : 206 S46 844" 14 _200.2 10: 3901-1 P2
Dennis M. Bruce, RE. T.A�j L '�oo
M.S.C.E. M.B.A. Gootechnical/ Civil Engineer
5-:3 0 A A Y
VARIABLE SIMET
St Nam.: Output---' Vnit----- Comment ---------------------------
1-0
200
1
120
2
2
sTmt
ECOLOGY BLOCK WALL
ap
#/tt3
active IRressure
PP
#/ft3
passive vre�isure
dl
ft
depth of p6sa"i've pressure,
WS
#.
"ight. of soil
d
ft...
depth of block
ft
width of block
T1
no. of -blocks
CF
coef.,of friction
S
face,. z�ope .(.s .:. 12)
Mot
?1439.602
4-ft
oveftVilning.-, rcoment
mr
?5458--5
#-ft
ih6me'nt
FS
3*.7916731
safety factor against overturnin
FS 1
3.9055556
safety -�faic!tor 6gainst sliding
T
9.4623222
deg
angle pf, I eari (theta)
11
9.,,8639392
'
height qt active pressure:
W
.600
#
weilht.1ok! b1ock
Fh
486.48649
active pressure force
X
1,8082$89.
ft
dist, , _�tb � W f tom A
y
��9591818
ft
diat.to Fh from A
Ft
1800
.#
friction force
W
3000
#
total weight
Fp6
109
#
passive pressure -torce
#/ft2
surchirge
.S
. I I . , . k
k_csor C jk �s E C�14 L C U t A--r (o o A
.-T14EF Fci0—'tL00_V_ WlkLL- "� I
0#--SmrF-Z( t V_�-tA-64(fitT-
.k S L (W 0 G .-
rAC.7ro& -
(5 V U'kTlo 0111) el
_1� essA 0,9 1 #J 6 9 Cr ts m I c
t-- Ad -re) k
-A (, 2.
N
ALL �=AC_rck.S
WEFLL
FYe_FE�/ -1)
t, ri - -
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITEDEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE * 0 IGN& PA
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206).646-9217 - FAX 546-8442
�)14
FEB - 12002
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
DONNA L. BRESKE, P.E.
14712-MeadowRd. Lynnwood, WA98037
Phone: 425-742-6386 Fax: 425-787-9330
STORM DRAINAGE DETENTION REPORT
FOR
MICHEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
DATE: OCTOBER 31, 2001
JANUARY 9,2002 (REVISION #1)
SITE: 532 & 534 DAYTON STREET
EDMONDS, WA
j S e ( d
-�v I/ jeJo e If --
re- p C �6
VA
171,
Fa— /:.:i:/ =WO 3
—C� C: b� V E D
F FE 2`01-0`2
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR�
CITY (IF lz�'[AIDNDS
DRAINAGE - DETENTION - INSPECTION - GRADING & TESC - SEWER & WATER
FEASIBILITY - SITE DEVELOPMENT
STREET FILE
Revision #1
January 9, 2002
ep
532 & 534 DAYTON.STREET
REVISION #1 (Use CN=73 for second growth forest per city of Edmonds)
OVERVIEW:
Condominiums are proposed.for construction at 532 & 534 Dayton Street. The.
site area to be developed is 11,000 square feet. CurTently, there are two houses and
outbuildings located on the property. Both houses and the outbuildings are proposed for
removal.
DETENTION CALCULATIONS DISCUSSION:
Attached are calculations that result in a storm water detention pipe of 4 feet in
diameter and 94 feet long. Required detention volume is 1, 181 cubic feet. For
calculation purposes, it was assumed that there is no existing impervious area, and a
CN=73 for second growth forest was used. The developed impervious area is 6,675
square feet.
The SCS method was used for calculation purposes. In accordance with the
Washington State Department of Ecology Manual, the pipe is designed to detain flows
from the 2-, 10- and I 00-yr 24-hr storm events.- Per the Washington State DOE Manual,
flows released from the detention structure are to match one-half of the calculated flow
from the pre -developed 2-yr storm, and to match the pre -developed flows of both the 1 0-
and I 00-yr storms. However, due to the conservative value of CN=73, the calculated
pre -developed 2-year flow is 0.00 cfs. Some fl ow must be released for the 2-year storm,
or the pipe,%Nrill never completely drain. Therefore, the controlled released for the 2-year
storm is set at 0.01 cfs. A chart of the pre -developed, developed and controlled
developed release flows is shown below:
DESCRIPTION
PRE -DEVELOPED
FLOWS
DEVELOPED
FLOWS
CONTROLLED
RELEASE DEV FLOWS
2-YR, 24 HR
0.05
0.01
10-YR, 24 HR
0.01
0.08
0.01
100-Y& 24 HR
0.02
0.13
0.02
FEB -
Revision #I
January 9,2002
DEVELOPME ' NT SERTCEb
r1TV ,)F-
5 2
3 9, 531 L
Ecimond5
/01 Draipagr Cal-cs �or Condo,
------ Lof Area. 11,7000- S-F
Soil T3pe.-' A.1derwood Urbon .14nd Complex
drolc�c" !s;A C-woup;-
.2
P/0 2. 0
p,00=- 3,0
FXISTIA�6i CONDMON-S- Ttx ;1605e-s,� shed-s
oil the properfy. i4oweveej fh&
.�
Heil e-e7 cissurne rio exi�f-('n_q imperv(oos
Peru 1'oos 000 SF
-73
Orass couer 5D - 75% 0J 4he arm CN
gavez-oPE:D coNIDITIOW&
)mpervious -eu(idif13 517-77
Drive Walks "646 5F
6�6 7 5
15- S 1qc
Ole
Pe(vlows-' 2-5-3 iqc-,/53 ,10 Ac
I-arid5copiAq w ('+ h ra 6.5 CN = q0
cover on 5o -.. % V� 4he area
PL E CIEF.u. V E D
FEB - 1
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
'1/ 8/02
page 1
JANUARY 8, 2002
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: A10OX NAME: 100 YR 24 HR
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION .... : 3.00 inches AREA..: :,�5 1
.og Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN.... 73
TIME OF CONC ..... : 23.35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA �R rl(
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: -0.00 Acres
CN.... 98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.02 cfs VOL: 0.02 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min
BASIN ID: AlOX
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL.....:
TIME OF CONC ..... :
ABSTRACTION COEFF':
NAME: 10 YR 24 HR EXISTING
0.25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA
2.00-inches AREA..: A-2.5 Acres
.CN. -b � � 0
10.00 min I ... : C73. 01�
23.35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA-
0.20 AREA..: 0.00 Acres
CN.... 98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.01 cfs VOL: 0.01 AC-ft TIME: 960 min
BASIN ID: A2X
NAME: 2 YR
24 HR EXISTING
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPEIA
PERVIOUS AREA -
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.30 inches
AREA..: cres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN.... 73.00
TIME OF CONC ..... :
23.35 min
IMPERVIOUS
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..: 0.00 Acres
I
CN.... : 98.00
TcReach,- Sheet
L: 100-00 ns:0.4000
p2yr: 1.30.s:0.0500
PEAK RATE: 0.00
cfs VOL: 0.00 Ac-ft TIME: 1320 min
,j 0�,
Rv E C Ell,
F 13
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR,
CITY OF EDMONDS
1/ 8/02 page 2
JANUARY 8, 2002
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: B100D
NAME: 100 YR
24 HR DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00
cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPEIA
PERVIOUS
PRECIPITATION.... :
3.00 inches
-AREA
AREA..:
0.10
Acres
TIME INTERVAL..�..:
10-00 min
CN.... :
90.00
TIME OF CONC ..... :
10-00 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.15
Acres
CN.... :
98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.13
cfs VOL: 0.05
Ac-ft TIME:
4�O
min
BASIN ID: BIOD
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL ....
TIME OF CONC .....
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
NAME: 10 YR 24 HR DEVELOPED
0.25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA
2.00 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres
10-00 min CN....:
10-00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
0.20 Al:?Ph * n 11 rz
es
CN....: 98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.08 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: B2D NAME: 2 YR 24 HR DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... : TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION .... : 1.30 inches AREA..: 0.10 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... : 10-00 min CN.... : 90.00
TIME OF CONC ..... : 10-00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.15 Acres
CN.... : 98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.05 cfs 'VOL: 0.02 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min-
rREE C E I VE D
F E_ B - 1 2 Pv C. 2
DEVELOPMENT SERViCE'S CTF,.
CiTy OP
8/02 page 3
JANUARY 8, 2002
512 & 534 DAYTON ST.
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD
RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM
RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1
0.002
1320
67 cf
0.25
2
0.006
960
291 cf
0.25
3
0.024
490
.778 cf
0.25
4
0.046
480
783 cf
0.25
5
0.081
480
1363 cf
0.25
6
0.134
480
2228 cf
0.25
11
0.008
980
783 cf
0.25
12
0.011
1340
1363 cf
0.25
13
0.025
800
2099 cf
0.25
I
R-1 E C: v
FEB - I
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C-rr,,
CITY OF LDMC�lj�.rl-1
00
1/ 8/02
page 4
JANUARY 8, 2002
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. Pi
Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE
e
Diameter: 4.00 ft. Length: 94.0 1/ 8/02
MICHEL CONST.
JANUARY 8, 200.2
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. Pi
Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE
Diameter: 4.00 ft. Length: 94.00 ft.
Slope...: 0.0050 ft/ft
RECEI:VED
FEB - 1 2002
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
1/ 8/02 page 2
JANUARY 8, 2002
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST
COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. C1
Description: COMBINATION DISCHARGE
Structure: 01 Structure:
Structure: N1 Structure:
Structure:
NOTCH WEIR ID No. N1
Description: NOTCH WEIR
Weir Length: 0.0830 ft. Weir height (p): 2.0000 ft.
Elevation 103.40 ft. Weir Increm: 0.10
MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 01
Description: ORIFICE
Outlet Elev: 100.00
Elev:- 99.00 ft Orifice Diameter: 0.5000 in.
P. E CIE I v E ED
FEB - I
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR,
CITY OF Ef�GNDSI
1/ 8/02 page 3
JANUARY 8, 2002
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- -PEAK-> STORAGE tiafCh
< -------- DESCRIPTION -------- �>, (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) PoRk
2 YR 24 HR ................... 0.00 0.05 Pl Cl 101.39 11 283.99 -01
10 YR 24 HR .................. 0.01 0.08 Pl Cl 102.45 12 669.34 010
100 YR 24 HR .................. 0.02 0.13 Pl Cl 103.59 13 1052.04 . 0
EP
REC:i=..VED
FEB - 1 2';'?
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE-S r.'rq.
CITY OF E'D*A;C!lJD'_2
Table 2.3
Runoff Curve Numbers for Selected Agricultural, Suburban, and Urban Areas
(Sources: TR 55, 1986, and Stormwater Management Manual, 1992. See Section 2.1.1 for explanation)
CNs for hydrologic s94!ffVM
Curve Numbers for Pre -Development Conditions
Pasture, grassland, or range -continuous forage for grazing:
Fair condition (ground cover 50% to 75% and not heavily grazed).
49
69
79 84
Good condition (ground cover >75% and lightly or only occasionally grazed)
39
61
74 80
Woods:
Fair (Woods are grazed but not burned, and some forest litter covers the soil).
36
60
794
q0
Good (Woods are protected from grazing, and liner and brush adequately cover the soil).
30
55
77
Curve Numbers for Post-DeveloRment Conditions
Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping, etc.)'
Fair condition (grass cover on 50% -.75% of the area).
77
85
19 92
Good condition (grass cover on >75% of th e area)
68
80
86 90
Impervious areas:
Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds etc.
100
100
Jx. 100
Paved parking lots, roofs2, driveways, etc. (excluding right-of-way)
98
98
C-9b 98
Porous Pavers and Permeable Interlocking Concrete (assumed as 85% impervious and 15% lawn)
Fair lawn condition (weighted average CNs).
95
96
97 97
Good lawn condition (weighted. average CNs).
94
95
96 197
Paved
98
98
.98 98
Gravel (including right-of-way)
76
85.
89 .91
Dirt (including right-of-way)
82 —
V 89
Pasrure, grassland, or range-condnuous forage for grazing:
Poor 6ondition (ground cover.<50% or heavily grazed with no mulch�
68
79
96 89
Fair condition (ground cover 50016 to 75% and not heavily grazed).
49
69
79 84
Good condition (ground cover >75% and lightly or only occasionally grazed)
39
61
74
Woods:
Poor (Forest litter, small trees, and brush are destroyed by heavy grazing or regular burning).
45
66
77 83
Fair (Woods are grazed but not burned, and some forest litter covers the soil).
36
60
73 79
Good (Woods are protected from grazing, and liner and brush adegilately cover the soil).
30
55
-10 77
Single family residential': Should only be used for Average Percent
Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre subdivisions > 50 acres impervious area 3*4
1.0 DU/GA 15
Separate curve number
1.5 DU/GA 20
shall be selected for
2.0 DU/GA 25
pervious & impervious
2.5 DU/GA 30
portions of the site or.
3.0 DU/GA 34
basin
3.5 DU/GA 38
4.0 DU/GA 42
4.5 DU/GA 46
5.0 DU/GA 48
5.5 DU/GA 50
6.0 DU/GA 52
6.5 DU/GA 54
7.0 DU/GA 56
7.5 DU/GA 58
PUD's, condos, apartments, commercial %impervious Separate curve numbers shall
businesses, industrial areas & must be be selected for pervious
and
su ivisions < 50 acres computed impervious portions
of the site
For a more detailed and complete description of land use curve numbers refer to chapter two (2) of the Soil Conservation Service's Technical
jel-se lo. (2 1 O-VITTR-55, Second Ed., June 1986).
2 vp� ap"c L;UVU1 LYPC.
Where roof runoff and driveway runoff are infiltrated or dispersed according to the requirements in Chapter 2, the average percent impervious
area maybe adjusted in accordance with the procedure described under "Flow Credit for Roof Downspout Infiltration" and "Flow Credit for Roof
Downspout Dispersion" in Chapter 2.
3Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into' sti=t/storm system.
4AII the remaining pervious area (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers.
REC-WED,
August 2001 Volume -.Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs BEVELOPME CTR.
UTY- 6F
1
—.—.--4 - --.— 50.00,
0#04 517
5HOULDER
CL05ED ,
,TlNr, & NITAKY 5EWE
W20-2 F/0 W20-? E/O
523
fulalelL
,� F"jer
p
50.001 -E 11 'i
IN�TALL
FPC R�13A
P05T INDICAiii .891141....
I AT p, 59.60 LNiFT S" PVC
CLO5EV 516N
CB #1
Alm: 95.06,
INV: 91.78
(INSTALLED
INTO EXISTING
a-- Pvc)
0
L
ROC��En
IAZA N5 TO
5TOK M
5y5TEhi
FPOPEFZ rY LINE
VAUL
WHEEL
L NdErj
7 ----- - 7
NEW 0
C-LA13
ELEV:
REMOVE
-- -Alff 44
---------- .......
50.00'__
THS CONTRACTOR 5HALL PE 'LACE ALL
AGED!CURB/C-UTTER AND 51VENALK A5
TIFIED� DY THE CITY IN5FECTOP ADJACENT
gQfd�ED WTE ONLY �IN5TALL 510EWALK
a a CLOSED CIGN
91
5dEWALId I I
)CYA NOTE: CAF
WILT EX15TING 51DE
1.:�2 5EWER
-,31 focgzzy- — -
rLEGEND:
Cp 0 16" Min. Traffic Ccnc5 (5paccd IO'O.C.)
oun
�X Sign Mou.:tcJI on Pc5t -'Zilti".
." " d 5t
TyFe
-f*5ig. Mo.aml 0. TyFe 11 Barricide
4;Jf!f,G-EVPAlN
I
01LAVAIER SEf.
1-0 521141TAR, 6F.-VER
PECI UOU5 TPEE�-
TO 5 1 MOVED
;3' CEDAR FENCE
-ENCLOu5UPE
0 KULFtKY
ply
I
— —.111.11-11 —1-1—
-
TRAFFIC CONTROL & TRUCK ROUTE PLAN
MICHEL CON5TRUCTION INC.
212TH 5T. 5.W. 5UITE 102
PHONE 1.425.776.2211
PERMIT # 01-?????
DATE 11.6.01
TRAFFIC TO PROCEEP WE5T ON DAYTON TO HIGHWAY 104, THEN 5OUTH TO HIGHWAY 99
STREU FILE
CITIT11r. COPY
81
R " Z, c E F IZ D,
N 0 V 13
BUiLDINIG. DEPT.
523
....... --- I
STING 5" 5AO01�ARY 5E
CL05ED 21, rIORM
1
50
I(, W20-? 5/0 W20-? E3/0
36"06" 36)(36"
INSTALL 51PEWALK/'�L
CLO5ED SIGN
Un fV5,
517
50.OU--
Fpc
P05T INDICA-i'
a 60 a,
" FVC dT --
i EX15TINO'l OE
I I
CB #1
RIM: 95.06
INV: 91.78
,INSTALLED
I TO EXISTING
IN PVC)
0
0
F.OD ' EFi'
DRAINS TO
5TOFM
E N'
5 FT
1-1711-17-
P?OF' EFTY UNE
fog!
50.00'
IN�TALL
- THIJ CONTPACTOI?. SHALL FE I -ACE ALL
ROBA
INTE
10)
MAGEDiCUP151GLITTE. AND SID ALK AS
ig
f IFIE(Y 5� THE CITY IN51"ECTO? ADJACENT
R ..... ..... A .....
66ED 'ITE ONLY INSTALL SIDEWALK
59.60 LNiFT S" PVC
1
CLOSED SIGN
FG 51 EWALIK
DCM NOTE: CAF
5T,
_Nr
CON FE
APLT EX15TING SIDE
01,IVVWA
TANK
li�12 SEWER
i7��Ta
—j
10,
MOV
1000
�WHE L
5TO 1 IlIdEFI L�*Qll \1G PARKING 1000
LEGEND
0 15" Min T,affio Co�e5 (5paGM 10'O.C.)
0 .145ion Mounted on FoFL or Tripod
it NEW CO JDO o.ntcJ on Typc;l 5arriGale
E V
�,',H,l I �T
OILIWATER 5EP.
1 0 5ANtlAr," 5EWE?' DECI UOU5 TKEE5
70 15 MOVED
7-, oo! -77=7�..-
'41 REMON �3'CEDAF FEhCE
-ENCLOU5U?E
'�5 --- — ---
0) KU�GIAEKI
UT�;
�l , A T T 1F7 V
MICHEL CON5TPLICTION INC.
TRAFFIC CONTROL & TRUCK ROUTE PLAN 212TH 5T. 5.W. 51JITE 102
PHONE 1.425.7765.2211
PERMIT #
low DATE 11.6.01
,,�2g rzjk��f
TRAFFIC TO PROCEED WE5T ON DAYTON TO HIGHWAY 104, THEN 5OUTH TO HIGHWAY 99
A'F,`PLRQAjNT COPY
8
RECEIVED
'151
NOV 13 20
BUILDING DEPT.
CA F11# C6
Critip, Areas Checklist
------- ------------------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/topogtaphy/hydrol.ogv/vegetation)
1. Site AddresslLocation: S2,Z S7-Z,6�A`7-
2. Property Tax Account Number: I-VaVe/0"
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): �4 0,0 0
4. Is this site currently developed? —yes; _ no.
If yes; how is site developed? S-t 11.5 le-- FCzf" t
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 04eet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% a vertical rise of
10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-fe eit over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
'be):
Other (please descri
.6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: 4/0 Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: A110 Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
Site is in the floodway _ A//) floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows acrossthe grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow sh, rubs mixed
. urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
--- --------- - -
5
"d `1
Ac I p .491.
Jpvtnt 4& :14, -moi- -
an
0
h
S:
in -;eart 'K QJ
Y ....... 0... 1 . .. Z A
e
i i , ate
... ... .....
en it J.
s -lye
sj d
V:
�niben ly
WA Mz
-A
Y
A,
4,2
R.... ... ...
-%_dLdM Roy Imm
City of Edmonds
............
Development Services Department
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax! 425.771.0221
Critical Areas FilM.
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00
Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept: i?,-1-4—oo
City Receipt No: I �o (,e2 -7
Date Mailed to Applicant:
CRITICAL ARX-EAS CHECKLIS--T
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
-permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. ' In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
7,6, ;i? AKC '�W
Name
Street Address
a4
'00r,
City State Zip
Telephon
Signature
Date
d:recept1onqana1CACLHandout.doc
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
Revised 411012000
The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO . .......................
102-08350 NEW CONSTRUCTION [] REPAIRS Ej LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO -------------
OWNER---- JOHN --- KALSTROlt ...................................................... CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO - --------------------
JOB ADDRESS ---- 532 DAYTON STREE
.. . . ....................... ............. Z-- ........................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK No - ------------------------------------
..................................................................................................................................................................
NAMEOF ADDITION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DYE TESTED ON SEWER
Approved:
PWW-0001 .11/75 (REV. 11/76)
DATE............................................ By ..............................................
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5th AVE. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES
May 20, 1985
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
. MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
John E. Kallstrom
1121 Vista Place
Edmonds, WA. 98020
Dear Mr. Kall.ttrom:
Your cooperation in furnishing the easement across your
parents' property in the City of Edmonds is appreciated.
The City crew will install the drain pipe and will work
with your parents to insure that the work will be completed to
their satisfaction.
RJ/st
CM�L &tW&A=:!f
RayN-J-61fhson. Dt
Sincerely,
# E I�DA
CiyS�Enineer
STREETTILE
PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING
PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING
4PDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA MEMO
Item number:
Originator: James E. Adams
For Action: x For Information:
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO ACCEPT EASEMENT FROM r
GEORGE KALLSTROM, JOHN KALLSTROM AND BARBARA SPRINKLE'
AGENDA TIME: Consent
AGENDA DATE: June 4, 1985
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
Easement (3 separate
signatures)
Clearances: Dept.
ADMIN SVCS/FINANCE
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CLERK
ICOMMUNITY S
ENGINEERING!j�
PARKS & REG�TON
PLANNING
PUBLIC WORKS
FIRE
PERSONNEL
POLICE
COMMITTEE
MAYOR
COMMENTS:
ndiv./Initials
EXPENDITURE AMOUNT APPROPRIATION
REQUIRED: $0 BUDGETED: $0 REQUIRED: $0
HISTORY/SUMMARY STATEMENT:
There is a storm drainage problem in the alley behind Milltown.
During heavy rainfall, our drainage system overflows and water
flows onto the Kallstrom property.
This easement will allow the City to construct a storm drain from
the alley to Dayton Street.
City Clerk Dt
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Authorize Mayor to accept the attached easement.
COUNCIL ACTION:
z
'__ #W
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 26, 1985
Ms. Barbara Sprinkle
12409 Holmes Point Dr.
Kirkland, WA. 98034
Dear Ms. Sprinkle:
LARRY S. NALIGHTEN
MAYOR
-Enclosed is a utility easement for your property on(Dayton
Street�in the City of Edmonds. We have discussed this with - your
---pardnts and have their approval.
We would appreciate your returning a signed, notarized copy
of this easement to this office in the enclosed return envelope.
RJ/st
Enclosures (2)
. —\A � - a_ vl�
. 41
a;y - 7) o-) 1h n s o n I I Dt
Sincerely,
4SA -'E�&_ M CS, 4P. E_
City Engineer
STREET FILE
4P
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 * (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES
January 28, 1985
J. R. Kallstrom'
1121 Vista Place
Edmonds, WA. 98020
Dear Mr. Kallstrom:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
SrRi�.
Czr ?- S
plt
Reference your letter regarding the storm drainage at
your father's property located at 5�� Dayton Street.
As you know, there has been a drainage problem in the
alley behind your father's home for several years. We
attempted to solve the problem by constructing a sump in the
alley, but it is not functioning well enough to take care of
all the runoff.
The only feasible solution to the problem appears to be the
installation of a drain from the alley to Dayton Street. The
City is willing to design and construct the culvert if we can
obtain an easement.
Since the current situation is affecting your father's
property, it appears reasonable to me to request -the ease-
ment from him. In my opinion, an underground drain culvert
along the westerly property line would not defer, in any.way,
from the�value of the property. It would be installed within
the required setback area for the construction of any structure.
I would appreciate meeting with you regarding this matter
at your convenience. If you have any questions,,please call
either Dan Smith or me at 771-3202.
Sincerely,
Ell Im 91W&I Fi
JEA/st
PUBLIC WORKS 0 PLANNING 0 PARKS AND RECREATION 0 , ENGINEERING
40
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
John R. Kallstrom
1121 Vista Place
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Mr. Kallstrom:
April 27, 1984
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
STREET FILE
In connection with the City of Edmonds plan to solve the
drainage problem on your property, the City is requesting that
you grant a ten foot easement along the westerly portion of
your -property. This easement is necessary in order for the City
to install and maintain a drainage pipeline along that portion
of your property.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please con-
tact either Gus Dela Cruz or me at 771-3202.
Sincerely,
a&EA_.t^A �D
City Engineer
GDC/st
cc: - John ' E. Kallst - rom
Gu Dela Cruz Dt
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
April 27, 1984
LARRY S. NALIGHTEN
MAYOR
George M. Kallstrom
11714 - 55th N.E.
Marysville, WA
Dear Mr. Kallstrom:
In connection with the City of Edmonds plan to solve the
drainage problem on your property, the City is requesting that
you grant a ten foot easement along the westerly portion of
your property. This easement is necessary in order for the City
to install and maintain a drainage pipeline along that portion
of your property.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please con-
tact either Gus Dela Cruz or me at 771-3202.
Si ncerely,
AD E.
gineer
GDC/st
cc: John E. Kallstrom
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5th AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
April 27, 1984
LARRY S. NALIGHTEN
MAYOR
Barbara Sprinkle
12409 Holmes Point Dr.
Kirkland, WA
Dear Ms. Sprinkle:
In connection with the City of Edmonds plan to solve the
drainage problem on your.property, the City is requesting that
you grant a ten foot easement along the westerly portion of
your property. This easement is necessary in order for the City
to install and maintain a drainage pipeline along that portion
of your property.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please con-
tact either Gus Dela Cruz or me at 771-3202.
Sincerely,
aMENE. ADAM , . .
City Engineer
GDC/st
cc: John E. Kallstrom.
HARVE 11. HARR!SON
CHTY OF
200 DAYTON ST. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (;,n,-�) 1 7,,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
March 16, Q81
)'k
Dear Resident:
On February 17, 1981, the Edmonds City Council passed
Resolution 488 for construction, reconstruction and repair
of deteriorated sidewalks. A T)uhlic hearing will be held
in the Council Chambers at the"Civic Center on.April 21,1981
at 7:30 P.M._- You are invited- to '1,t,t.e.nd,_this heari.r.9 for
discussing repair of P(?rtions;�of'-:cieE,,.6�io�.atiedz-�,-�,id�-'
abutting your, proper ty'TH6'�-�'i '1'pt6 vem6_ht_' ��e sidewalks in
m
need of rer ' )air at the expense of the abuttinq propertv
owner is provided by City Ordinance, Chapter 7.20 and.
Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 35.68.
The areas needing repair have been marked in paint on
the sidewalk adjoining your property. Reconstruction' and
repair of these sidewalks must be completed on or beEore
September 1, 1981. In the event improvements are not
completed within the above specified time, the City will
perform and complete the improvements at the Pxp(--nse'o'f the
abutting pr6perty owner.
This action is in response to manv citizen requests
and pedestrian falling accidents which have been increasing
in recent years as a result of sidewalk deterioration and
increased pedestrian traffic.
Sincerely,
FRED F. HERZBERG
Director of Public works
0.
CIrMcal Areas Checklistclw
------------------ --------------- -----------
Site Information (soils/topographyjhydrolo /vegetation)
1. Site Address/Location:
2. Property Tax Account Number: —n0j" jcq��A4t9" -+34-2- 1 Z 1 0 12-OD
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 0
4. Is this site currently developed? A' yes; no..
If yes; how is site developed? c>)- It
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: . less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes onsite generally less than 15 % (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of
I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: 4/0 Approx.. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: tVO
Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8.. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested J meadow, shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: Ao
tM I.
.. .. . ... .....
d ftOrr RA -4--Y 'tlj -
7 TZ
th
Ap�-AM04*01'. - 11.1 01
Or.
dig
�4 -k
Li
.0
30.
R
4�4
MTZT:X��
M
ftk."doc. Rw 1QMM
EDr.,u
_x 0 -
City of Edmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax: 425.771.0221
4C. IS90
Critical Areas File'T-
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00
Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept: 1-1-- 44 - o 0
City Receipt No:- I to(. -7
Date Mailed to Applicant:
CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be -easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the. checklist, make a
precursory site visit and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating' the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the.site.
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
'Te;!-e
Name
7YO c2MP2 sew AZ!/d2_
Street Address
JE��If,olv � _( 1 61-�-
City State Zip
*W__ ?.?6- lzl)�//
Telephon
p
Signature
C)
Date
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
city State . Zip
relephone
Signature
Date
d:reception/jonatCACLHandotit.doc
Revised NIQ2M
F�
Z
U
0
U
W
co
0
Z
0
�w
V)
U
2�
0
CITY OF EDMONDS � 1W qV PernlWoll�%-� �1—
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Issue Date
RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
A. *Address or vic "nity of Construction 0 Permit Issued To:
Owner: FF— C) S On 9 Type of Work to be Done: a I A) -A fejck
Name //I 0/-j ) ;�
10 0 6 0 Worl� in Connection With:
Mailing Address 0 Sub or Plat 0 Single Family
Ej�� M f, W!�, . 9 70 Z- 1:1 Comml. / Ind. 0 Apt. Condo.
City, S ta te, Zip Code. 0 Pavement Cut: El Yes El No
Contractor:
Name
Mailing Address State License Number
City, State, Zip Code Tel'.ephone Number
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call
775-2525, extension 220.
I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times.
I , A / — -� A
Signature:
Owner or Agent
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
C. Issued By: A -t) 11
' 4,ft— N t:? days
Time Authorized: Void er
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
Permit Fee:
Security Deposit:
Receipt No.: F?ECE "-ED
Fund ill Fee:
Street Cut Dimensions OCT 2 7 1981
X
U11- Ur VUWIL i�.-,,S
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
Eng. Div, December 1978
FIELD INSP*,* NOTES (F,u:,n'd 69.9oute conv to Street Dent.]
Comments:
Diagram:
Contractor called for inspection- Yes (H-0.)
Work Disa.pproved By: Date: Bv:, Date:
Work Approved Bv: Date:
Inspector:
Ena. Div. December 1978
M
94
I P E 0 M 0 N U ",E, HARVE H. HARRISON
CITY C MAYOR
200 DAYTON ST. ED%AONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206)175-21��
DEPARTMENt OF PUBLIC WORKS
March 16, 1981
"ft�
IS VFTET FILE
Dear Resident:
On February 17, 198.1, the Edmonds City Council passed
Resolution 488 for construction, reconstruction and repair
of deteriorated sidewalks. A Public hearing'will be held
in the Council Chambers at the -Civic Center on April 21,1981
at 7:30 are invited to att.e,nd_this hearing for.
ion
repc�ir o
discussing f 0 s�,o
abutting yo'u*'r` rope r ty".` The, 1mpr'ov6mdHE of' lks in
need of repair at the expense of the abutting property
owner is provided by City Ordinance, Chapter 7.20 and
Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 35.68.
The areas needing repair have been marked in' pai.nt on�
the sidewalk adjoining your property. Reconstruction' and
repair of th6se sidewalks must be completed on 'or bef'ore'�
September 1, 1981. In the event improvements are not:
completed within�the above specified time, the 'City will
perform and complete the improvements at*. the expense 'of the
abutting property owner.
This action is' in response to many citizen requests
and pedestrian falling accidents which have be'en increasing
in recent years as a result of sidewalk deterioration' and
increased pedestrian traffic.
Sincerely,
FRED F. HERZBERG
Director of Public Works
The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................
102-08550 NEW CONSTRUCTION [j REPAIRS E] LID NO - ------------------ ASMT. NO - ------------------
OWNER .... qHA-RLES --- O.L.S-ON ....................................................... CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO - --------------------
..... ........... -- -- -- -----
JOB ADDRESS ...... 53-4 --- DAYTON ... STREET ................................ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ..................................... BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------
..................................................................................................................................................................
NAMEOF ADDITION .......................................................................................................... ............
DYE TESTED ON SEWER
Approved:
PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11178) DATE ............................................ 13) . ..................... ......................................
J
W kA
w
Q,
W
z
0
0
I
Lli
OD
(S:)
Lcl)l
00
r-
Lr)
c"I
1�1`
C14
-1
(10
-4
Lr)
ED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
rM EAST 10 IFIXTZ LOT 1 0 A-M ALL W LOT 11 or ej�y
I ft ftAl IN VOLLNE PLATI AT PAGE(g) V%
w S'd*lmdllH cftmtn. %6wujcrmL
-.0
Late I? Afe 13 IN aLom It[ or CITY OF KDwW3L ADOMsM TV pL4r
mma= I?v VoLoff a cr FLATS AT FUMI) 3L IN SCMCgK OMM",
644M 1 in I CK
DEDICATION
-11 � b, I%...
--.1 pr.,ty
't-t Od S. th.
Th- La. P,.P—I:l rt"ll!r
I.L..o ..It. --y $Ub i1:111 WlJdlm�p
..,..y _W -6 th.. ,,—; 'I— 'I 'OWI.144. Th.
Ol jo� t.91- �11 b. I-Lj.t.4 b,
h—d -d t, h
lll�l C�(
It. %Jtwl
ACKNOWLED13MENT
st.t. .( impgotj�;t��)
C�ty 't %N.#j.*'
I .-Lify %bgl I k_ IN L MUML
C_PIj� I. b. t'_ in :0. 1
ti-
AW
3HEET 1 OF 4
THE DAYTON
A COWOMINILN
SW 1/4. SV 1/4, SEC. 24, T. 27N, P, 3E. W. W.
EDWNM USHINGTOW
LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
pl—. f— Th. ow� . ..
16. d—lb.@ b_j, _, t�_
h- Lb.- _d taol
lo�tl� �d 42-1- 'f Lho -4t,
_'I'll y Tu_ at-
LZIL
powpwn I GPM L*o IlLor"mIllm
agrTIFICAT'Ir w mom
LAND SURVEYOR'S VERIFICATION
2L.I. .1 ll� -
cO..t7 r � -
JON` 4-06 ftl--. W-2 (Ir.t
1-0 Lt.
INION .4 boll.- t"
06
C-t I 1--t- fti� 3"F7
3.b
tht. 2cpl*-
LI
Am
W7 -P�1.1
41P
APPROVAL
9—"-" -110 a0lW L&I. — d., r
WAATMIT CF &INUMMODM
U-16-W-6 0—ty A.
ci�t, ;W�.A
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE
rit-4 I— '—d t #
tbs. &D
1—d.d 1. V.1 mme
%-- '—ft C�_t'y-
lhhl�jt_
RECEIVED
MAY � 18 2004
PERMIT COUNTER
AF #
c a C. 96
M
(K)
LL1
LD
0
Ln
z
0
C)
I
LIJ
r
U
2:
LD
01)
(I)&
In
c1`1
CD
CD
N
03
In
CD
THE DAYTON
A CONDOwINIUM
Sir 1/4, SW 1/4# SEC. 24. T. 27N, R. 3E, W. W.
EDWIM II&AWTA, 1r4w
IMPARI KAIL in LEG lo
COW WoN IN 1"IXL CAN
OTH AVGMK ZpM
)r In OLUM *I= TV
awc wo In WML Cw
t 61 Lf; ff 94
- ----------
-----------------------
tar
Auxonna
20
Tel Al,
:r==s Pei COCA T ,L"
f
A
L— — --- — — — — — — — — — h. 0
RUd*(
CONSUL
AF
C A C Soveying]
49* aoM pL SW
Miami UN or R I a cr
%WSW ft um "N"a"L 19a, w I' me 4 1. 0 Miam, w I Comm V
pormin. I ow
In rx 0
Qb
SHEET 2 OF 4
9
THE DAYTON
Sjj 1/4, SIV I A CON00id I N I UkI
A SEC. 24, T. 27N, R. 3E. W.
OMMK RWINGTON
CAUX FLOM PLAN (No W
4Lr)
ol"i ( L- DOI)
101
VUL I w
" m04
COO=
I I
L . v
IG2
go& a IF
RA I CA 64
CUL lit 54
ft7fe (L�g "
IST FLOOR " NO SCALZ)
Ail� _TA
To
Cmi.N
on& X
rnotlo,i *_ orled. ..,t, OR ;;:j= AM bm
Al� MMIW is MALacs To CoMewma USE. amliall
MCTLM IQIF14 1,, ,a O"L-UA r I QK
1. AJ_L LN
I'llry. AIM 10 "W MIWACLs op rM VrkV & AOK WVM to " M_AaM
L
T'. a.:A I
n-=M A ALL.
Poin Ift .M CC
Alk To
k Lon r —LAS onto,,, CE) .w
"Imm AM allow rmw
S4EET3 OF 4 a TOTAL UNIT ,,, u ." It rt" —AILAll., INALLIL .
AF
C & c
IF
In
(S:)
LLJ
(D
<1
11
Lf)
z
0
U
I
Ld
r
C)
LD. 0
01)
CD
cyl
CD
r-
Lr)
C14
LD
(S:)
CD
C\I
OD
THE DAYTON
A CMftlNIUM
SW 114, SW 114P SEC- 24, T. 27N. R. 3E. W. jL
EOWNDS, 0WHINCTON
Ciraw (L,3[J
PAN
ftft a IS,
CIM IRL
IIIISM
0xv
cow"Mm
LO� — ft-�
aftleff
"own
a0it
leak 4 ar
I" It.00
I "li. U2.76
OraN (Lcqo
2M PL&W " (40 =ALAO
=A,1.4
#wm
90,
ALL LAIND -- En
rVA "ORIN Is IN w QUIL-imrim
AA LNIT
Fic". 4w a
k ALL FLOM ,LA""a 7,.,Mo"jZ,1 2LWACEZ,op ALL MLAPIIIV7 4L I
rm %am" or rmIr C3[ OU LI
ALL ","A NINIS, a-cVArjoSft �ft
rcl) III— TIT*-m 0, = 'W'.
COMM &MEW73 (L`M)' ""s" a"IC%ArtD AS (CIL) AIK
LIPS I I "Mm Aft &*N. 11"Llik Sol
dk So So& L., AAMA Is I" I& FIX., mcumjw zm�JMA'Jam SISSI14.
Jft FLaM PLAN (NO ICALAO
AF I .
C&C
40624bg pL SW
WA 0aw
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial / MultiFamily Proiect
. �5w
SITE ADDRESS:_,��6� P owim St. ZONING: 12-M - I j
USE(S) PROPOSED: V 4 it P-ts - C'D Vid (9 ALLOWED?: YfS -
�LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N)
CUP File: RO To Allow What Uses?-
ADB FILE MA-25 - 2-cot -,5ce
PARKING:
101
I
UseW� 61f dr!520P r 4ki o. Spaces Required: :2— �pt<l 4A,
X AP1 r+--.> (floor area, # employees, etc.) = LSP �s
Use: No. Spaces Required:
2, M,,,,rf-5 W-
X 0_)n (floor area, # employees, etc.) = q, to
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees, etc.)
Use: No. Spaces Required:
X (floor area, # employees ' tc.
'Total Required: L4 5;,t; > 7S Actual Provided: 169
� 7.r ;iA6 :&
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 1131 Left Side: Right Side: Rear:
Actual Setbacks:
Front: I �9 Left Side: Right Side: /.Rear:
Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No)
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Zoo L11.-S
Maximum Allowed Actual:
P I
BUILDING HEIGHT:
O�
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:
jA
Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height:
—Datum
Datum Point: 01 aA-i Fge Elevation: -+-100
Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? NO If so,VAR#-,
z
r_
LANDSCAPING:
Matches AD13 approved:
Bid Provided? 0,6 Bond Amount (100% bid):,�j 10 �r7
w
CRITICAL AREAS#: CA - 00 - 5q
SEPA DETERMINATION:
SHORELINE REQUIRED?:
Continued
V\1ibrary\^P1andatNiW'Comm.doc
0
0
DATE: PLAN CHK#:
NAME OF BU . ILDING PERMIT APPLICANT:zIr�'hip'l (Zos4vuLq-Lo�u
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: UKL+ kL<�161zwhoJ) clpKcLo(a-� 530
26W 121 'S+ -
ADB FILE #:A'PO- 01-5(f ORDATEWAIVED:
PLANS MATCH APPROVEDRLAN:
SUBDIVISION: No
LOT A GREGATION REQUIRED?:
RED CED SITE PLAN (8.5X1 1) PROVIPEDD FOITISTREET FILE?
OTHER:
:�2�4-e-- I
Plan Review By:
1Afibrary\^P1andatNewComm.doc
jV0. C4ff
Aw
Critical Areas Checklist
------- ------------------------------------------------------
Site Information (soil s/topography/hydrol.o V /vegetation)
I . Site AddressfLocation: )'—' Y —/Ov
2. Property Tax, Account Number: ello� C9 0
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 00
4. Is this site currently developed? X, yes; no.
If yes; how is site developed? c>)— le— Yca�0" iF
5.
Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
13 L'A
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise
BVILDING DETT.
o
1 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical -rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6.
Site contaihs areas of year-round standing water: A/0 Approx. Depth:
7.
Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8.
Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course.
9.
Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10.
Site is primarily: forested meadow_ ;shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11.
Obvious wetland is present on site: Alo
90:t
.JV 4
d it 1W RAY
6
Y, ..4
'at rinca -A ea -on site .7
1�C.Ar e n c
I jeas'ihV ntRT
h :-`b@::'�**: 8 1� 0044�'
i ar
ASA e*1 r t i,g, a
.0--.Ae: ronmeA�Ooenslt
A M
ll E7 W.-
Ell
A
b
Da
AC�_ChL&C; RW 10/0)/97
jV0.
Critical Areas Checklist
------- ------------------------------------------------------
Site Information (Soils/topography/hydrol /vegetation)
1. Site Address[Location:
2. Property Tax Account Number:
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? K yes; _
//0000
no.
-97-,e,6;e57—
34-2- VZ I D 12-OD
If yes; how is site developed? eX SWI 5 15— FCq-1 t #0*-e4p
Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire 'site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on s ite of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of
1 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of .1 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
Site contains areas of year-round standing water: —4/0 Approx. Depth:
Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: A10 Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) -r -
11. Obvious wetland is present on sitc A/0
YJ
16
M
--g, g
t�p
:V
...........
4c,
lag
y,%
MA,
Y
g
V5 ,
N� ?;
/W.A.
�f fr
-V. jk�
L .... ... .
IR
'",aL6K Rov IWOM
Dennis M. Bruce, RE.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/ Civil Engineer
-."WED
November 12, 2001
1.1 1 3 2 0 01
:.� I I t
- --iLDING DEPT.
Mr. Rob Michel
Michel Construction, Inc.
7907 - 212th Street S.W. #102
Edmonds, Washington 98026
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation "Soils Report"
Proposed Five Unit Condominium Project
530 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington
This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation at 530
Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington, with respect to the proposed six unit
condominium project. This evaluation was required due to owner / developer
concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements.
REFERENCES:
• Location map
• Site plan
• Project drainage plan by D. Bruce, P.E.
• Photographs
BACKGROUND:
The proposed five unit condominium project, to be constructed by Michel
Construction, Inc., will occupy the majority. of the overall property, with access drive to
underground parking at the north from Dayton (see site plan).
The area surrounding this project consists of similar condominium projects to
the east, south, and west.
EVALUATION:
Visual assessments of the property at 530 Dayton Street revealed no evidence
of any geotechnical distress. No slides, no settlements, no creep, nor any significant
erosional degradation were observed. This engineer has considerable experience in
the immediate vicinity and understands the foundation subgrade conditions.
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIT - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 (206) 546-9217 FAX 546-8442
0
0
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street MoV 13 M'l
Pagetwo BUILDING DEPT.
Experience has proven that the subgrade soils are fully capable of properly supporting
the proposed condominium project.
In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were
dug under this engineer's observation in November of 2001. A total of four (4)
backhoe soil test pits were dug. (See C3 for locations). All four soil test pits revealed
similar subgrade conditions, namely:
0" to 8" Lawn, roots, and organic silt
8" to approx. 9' Relatively clean sands, with occasional gravels, dense to
very dense
No ground water was observed in any of the test pits. All test pit walls
remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred.
CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in
the area, the property at 530 Dayton Street is geotechnically approved for the
proposed Michel Construction five unit condominium project, subject to the following:
Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing
pressure: 3,000 p.s.f.
Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall
design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer.
For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive' p ressu re of
350 p.c.f.
Temporary shoring in accordance with D. Bruce, P.E. recommendations,
utilizing ecology blocks carefully placed under this engineer's inspection are
required. This ecology block shoring should be properly embedded in the
undisturbed subbase soil and installed at a batter angle of 1 H:6V. Additionally,
the shoring blocks should be staggered, as indicated in the elevation view.
NOTE: the use of Eco-Blocks is to provide a construction expedient to prevent
erosional sloughing from the dense native sands and gravels. Shoring (per se)
is not geotechnically required.
Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete
placement. '
RECEIvEZ)
NOV 13 2001
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street
Page three BUILDiNG DEPT.
The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and
spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above
native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill
for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and
individual spread footings should have.minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-
four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches
below the lower adjacent finish ground surface.
Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required
below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill
the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least
as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width.
For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot
wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation.
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per
square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used
when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is
anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent,
native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half
inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between
the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the
vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the
foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill
placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We
recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to
lateral loading:
Parameter
Coefficient of Friction
Passive Earth Pressure
Where:
Design Value
0.55
350 p.c.f.
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot.
(2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density.
RECEVED
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street NOV 13 2001
Page four
BUILDING DEPT.
A safety factor of at least 1.5 is recommended for design of the foundation's
resistance to lateral loading.
SLABS -ON -GRADE:
Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils
or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these
soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel
underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4)
inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic
membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes.
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS:
Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral
earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following
recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height
which restrain level backfill:
Parameter Design Value I
Active Earth Pressure* 35 p.c.f.
Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f.
Coefficient of Friction 0.55
Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c.f.
Where:
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot
(2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid
densities.
For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall
height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be
added to the active equivalent fluid pressure).
The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and
retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing
the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and
sliding.
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street
Page five
pzup=_���
NOV 13 2001
BUILDING DEPT.
The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures
behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above
the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above
lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will
need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the
appropriate design earth pressures.
Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and
foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are
designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement
and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated
equipment.
Retaining Wall Backfill
Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls
should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should
contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater
than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve
should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt
content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi
and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage
composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the
purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the
retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind
the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains
recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind
retaining and foundation walls.
EXCAVATION AND SLOPES:
In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local,
state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of
four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a
height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:
(Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under
specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts
may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be
inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is
important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors
RECEEIVF-D
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street 3 2001
Page six BUILDING DEPT-
should be made aware of this potential hazard.
Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary
or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an
appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the
surficial layer of soil.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS:
No drainage problems were evident with the lot and existing residence at 530
Dayton Street. Surface runoff flows'generally northwesterly into the existing City of
Edmonds storm water system.
Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls.
These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus
washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or
similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as
low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and
surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system.
The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off
the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any
area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed
slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas
adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building,
except where the area adjacent to the building is paved.
GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL:
The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of
all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped
or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural
fill.
Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent
retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to
support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after
excavation prior to placement of any structural fill.
All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or
near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture
0 0
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street E
Page seven MOV 13
BUILDING DEPT.
content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of
fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and
compaction process.
The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type,
compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case
should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table
presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill:
Location of Fill Placement
Beneath footings, slabs or walkways
Behind retaining walls
Beneath pavements
Minimum Relative
Compaction
95%
41TIA.
95% for upper 12 inches of
subgrade, 90% below that level
Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of
the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in
accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor).
Use of On -Site Soils
If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when on -site soils are wet,
site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential
need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and thus are not
moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of
these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content.
Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and
"pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater
than the optimum moisture content.
Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a
granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage
of particles passing the No. 200'sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil
passing the three -quarter -inch sieve.
0
0
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street RECOVED
Page eight NOV 13 200
BUILDING DEPT.
The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper
organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering
inspection.
DRAINAGE CONTROLS:
No drainage problems were evident at 530 Dayton Street. Currently surface
runoff flows generally westerly. The drainage plan entails total control of storm water
runoff by means of containment, a detention vault and controlled orifice release into
the existing City of Edmonds drainage system.
CONCRETE:
All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls,
etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete
mix.
INSPECTION:
The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical
aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction:
• Soil cuts
• Foundation subgrade verification
• Retaining wall, or rockery placement
• Any fill placement
• Subsurface drainage installation
SUMMARY:
The proposed Michel Construction six -unit condominium project proposed for
530 Dayton Street, Edmonds, is geotechnically viable when constructed in
accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds
approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspection dauring,
construction.
STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK:
The plans and specifications for the proposed six unit Michel Construction
condominium project at 530 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington, have been
reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and
0 0
RECEIVED
Michel Construction, Inc. / 530 Dayton Street
Page nine vnv i'l 2,201
BUILDING DEPT.
report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during
the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area
disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the
potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and
from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal.
CLOSURE:
The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other
warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results
of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored
locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different
than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the
situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
EXPIRES IMN
� Q Al I I-M 01
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
Geotechnical / Civil Engineer
DONNA L. BRESYCE, P.E. 6621 Foster Slough Rd. Snohomish, WA 98290
Phone: 425-334-9980 Fax: 425-334-7380
STORM DRAINAGE DETENTION PIPE SIZING & DESIGN
FOR
M[ICBEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 23, 2002
SITE: 532 & 534 DAYTON STREET
EDMONDS, WA
SL,jr)
or if
eDr
.02
S, 2 7 2012
T
STREET FILE
DRAINAGE-DEIENI'l -INSPECTION- GRADING& TESC -SEWER& WATER
FEASIBILITY - SITE DEVELOPNIENT
532 & 534 DAYTON STREET
SIZE 4 FIr. DIAMIETER DETENTION PIPE TO M[EET 94.01 CB INVERT.
OVERVIEW:
Condominiums are proposed for construction at 532 & 534 Dayton Street The
site area to be developed is 11,000 square feet. Currently, there are two houses and
outbuildings located on the property. Both houses and the outbuildings are proposed for
removal.
DETENTION CALCULATIONS DISCUSSION:
Attached are calculations that result in a storm water detention pipe of 4 feet in
diameter and 83 feet long. For calculation purposes, it was assumed that no existing,
J:�
impervious area exists thus using loped
impervious area of the building is 5,977 square feet. Due to the topography, the
impervious area of the driveway will not flow to the. detention pipe, and hence was not
taken into consideration for sizing the pipe.
The SCS method was used for calculation purposes. In accordance. with the
Washington State Department of Ecology Manual, the pipe is designed to detain flows
from the 2-, 10- and. I 00-yr 24-hr storm events. Per the Washington State DOE Manual,
flows released from the detention structure are to match one-half of the calculated flow
from the pre -developed 2-yr storm, and to match the pre -developed floWs of both the 10-
and I 00-yr storms. However, due to the conservative value of CN=73, the calculated
pre -developed 2-year flow is 0.00 cfs. Some flow must be released for the 2-year storm,
or the pipe will never completely drain. Therefore, the controlled released for the 2-year
storm is set at 0.0 1 cfs. A chart of the pre -developed, developed and controlled
developed release flows is shown below:
DESCRIPTION
PRE -DEVELOPED
FLOWS
DEVELOPED
FLOWS
CONTROLLED
RELEASE DEV FLOWS
2-M 24 HR
0.00
0.04
0.01
I 0-Y& 24 HR
0.01
0.08
0.01
100-YR, 24 HR
0.02
0.13
0.02
Con:5�
112-:3102,
5 063
jr,
CONTR01- --�TIZVCTUkr=� DE7391L
NOTCH Wg[R-
EL:- 102, If
HE16HT= 0- 1
Vq IDTH
H
p vc
o uT PIFE
(0 lipVc
TEF
19.0 6 pvc PIPE
6" MIN
T CBY
48 upe 2
p1c CAP
TH ADH.ESIVF-
G,EcURt vit
P. bq M ETE IR
s4)
OKI r- ICE 'IWCENTER
NOTCH W519 OF Ch P
0 ETA I L
MR-EPAREED BY:
DONNA L. BRESKE9 P.E.
10;2,4 6621 FOSTER SLOUGH RD.
SNOHONHSH, WA 98290
PHONE: 425-334-9980
pvc FAX: 425-334-7380
a j I- —.ud irn
. r=dmodi, 0
D6aaie Cq(
112-3102
10.4a Lof A-rea.. 11,, wo - SF
So I Typeo 41derwood Urbar
Vrol000lc -SDII 61-Oups. C
P,=
-z o
Poo
2-5 3 Ac
Land Ccrilplex
Cond�btls., —wo houses e �beds ex�,sf on ihe
proper+�. However, i-hej will be removed, tiLcilte
as6ume no
-, _9
Pervious-,= li, 000 (:�F I:_ .2-53 Ac
(5-a-<s cover 50-75'Z W Me A -ea, ('M=73
Devetoped Gridtil"Ons.,
lm'perv'ous 19 c)'i Idl -1-7 5F
nj
/37 14c
CN'= Ct 8
Peru iOL)s 13 7 c
CAI
L4njSCjOiJj w "th CoLer
55-0-7509 arect,
0
9/23/02
0
page. 1
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
-------- --------
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID�: A10OX
NAME: 100 YR
24 HR
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL�,TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION ....
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.25 Acres
TIME INTERVAL ....
10.00 min
CN....
73.00
TIME OF CONC .....
23.35 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
CN-...
98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.02
cfs VOL: 0.02
A c-ft TIME:
490 min
BASIN ID*..AlOX NAME: 10 YR 24 HR EXISTING
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL -AREA. ....... :
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION .... :
2.00 inches
AREA..:
0.25 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN� ...
73.00
TIME OF CONC ..... :
.23.35 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
PEAK RATE: 0.01 cfs VOL:
CN.... : 98.;00
0.01 Ac-ft' TIME: 960 min
BASIN ID: A2X
NAME: 2 YR 24 HR EXISTING
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION .... :
1.30 inches
AREA..:
0.25 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN.... :'
73.00
TIME OF CONC ...... :
23.35 min
IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
CN.... :
98.00
TcReach Sheet
L: 100.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.30
s:0.0500
PEAK RATE: 0.00
cfs VOL: 0.00
Ac-ft TIME:
1320 min
9/23/02 page 2
MICHEL CONST.
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: B100D
NAME: 100 YR
24 HR DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPEIA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION .... :
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.12 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN....
90.00
TIME OF CONC ..... :
10-00 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.13 Acres
CN.... :
98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.13
cfs VOL: 0.05
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: BIOD
NAME:-10 YR
24 HR DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA ....... :
.0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION .... :
2.00 inches
AREA..: 0.12 Acres
TIME INTERVAL .... :
10.00 min
CN.... : 90.00
TIME OF CONC ..... :
10.00 min
IMPERVIOUS.AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..: 0.13 Acres
CN.... : 98.00-
PEAK RATE: 0.08
cfs VOL: 0.03
Ac-ft TIME: 1 480 m in
BASIN ID: B2D
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA .......
RAINFALL TYPE ....
PRECIPITATION ....
TIME INTERVAL ....
TIME OF CONC .....
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
NAME: 2 YR 24 HR DEVELOPED
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
1.30 inches
AREA..:
0.12 Acres
. 10.00 min
CN.... :
90.00
10.00 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
0.20
AREA..:
..0.13 Acres
CN.... 98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.04 cfs VOL: 0.02 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
0
9/23/02
page 3
MICHEL
CONST.
DETENTION
PIPE
SIZING
532 & 534
DAYTON ST.
HYDROGRAPH
SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM
RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
dfs
min.
cf\AcFt
Acres
1
0.002
1320
67 cf
0.2 5
2
0.006
960
291 cf
0.25
0.024
490
778 cf
0*.25
4
0.044
480
751 cf
0.25
5
0.079
480
1324 cf
0.25
6
0.131
480
2182 cf
0,25
11
0.008
980
751 cf
0.25
12
0.011
1340
1324 cf
0.25
13
0.025
800
2080 cf
0.25
9/23/02 page
MICHEL CONST.
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. P1
Description: UNDERGROUND PIPE
Diameter: 4.00 ft. Length: 90.00 ft.
Slope... 0.0050 ft/ft
48 it
o2-sl
3j51
Reduc�� 'n lellyA due io Arzt 2-
,3e- in ftw 16 W
2, (3,51) = 82. 8 2
It 83 LF 'Pe
2-
9/2.3/02 page 2
MICHEL CONST.
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
---------------- -------- --------
DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST
COMBINAT ION DISCHARGE' ID No. C1
D . escription: COMBINATION DISCHARGE
Structure': ol Structure:
Structure: N1 Structure:
Structure:
NOTCH WEIR ID No. N1
Description: NOTCH WEIR
Weir Length: 0.0830 ft. Weir*height (p): 2.0000 ft. Me's 9ule
Elevation 102.40 ft. Weir Increm: 0.10 10z, 5-7
MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 01 CA5e He!5W
Descriptlion: ORIFICE 0,
Outlet Eiev: 99.00.
E16v:. �98.00 ft Orifice Diameter: 0.5000 in.
9/23/02 page 3
MICHEL CONST.
DETENTION PIPE SIZING
532 & 534 DAYTON ST.
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- -PEAK-> STORAGE PldiCh
--------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- -c-STAGE> id VOL W) po:�k
(Lts)
2 YR 24 HR a .................. 0.00 0.04 Pl Cl 100.35 11 262.53 0-01
10 YR 24 HR .................. 0.01 0.08 pl Cl 101.42 12 636.63 0.0 1
lbb YR 24 HR ................. 0.02 0.13 Pl Cl 102.59 13 1011.13 0.02
PERMIT NO: 96'72
C of Edmonds
ity d9/03,
RW3 . PERMIT EXPIRE
T
SIDE SEWER PERMI S*Z
cj/ YK
Aw � - .-I
Address of Construction:
b-
Property Tax Account Parcel No.
Attach copies of all access and utility easements
Owner and/or Contractor:
Contractor License #:
E] Single Family
Multi -Family (No: of Units
F1 Commercial (No. of Units
.. H Public
A)
06
-and -Approved by
k YJ Building Permit.#: 26012-0230
Yes 0 No'
Invasion into City *Right -of Way:
*RW Construction Permit #_
Cross other **PrivAte Property: El Yes XN�
"Attach. legal description and copy of recorded ease,ment.
Owner/ rittactor
___1 - -
Owner or 64ritractor signature and acknowledgement statemenk Date
By signing for this permit I certify that I have read the-City's public handout entitled
ide . Sewer Sp . ecific�tions, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein.'
9 CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-8004�T.,.5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION W
W FOR INSPECTION CALL -425-771-0220 extension 2049
24 HOUR NOTICE REOUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS
NOTE: * IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN
INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE-INSPECTIO.N.FEE—WILL BE CHARGED.
Job Site Ready YES, .'NO Date: —initial:—
Partial Inspection:* Date: Initial:
Partialinspection: Date: Initial,: -
FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: 10A��102__Initial:_ _T M As -built to Street File:
fl, PERMIT MUST BE PICISTED ON,,JOB SITE t-
White Copy: File 'GreeKCopy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant
L;temp;bldg,forms-,sspermitjlg4/00.
9 .- 0
Garage
--j 1-1 1 -1
-h- -
walier line installed.
CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS- BUILT
ADDRESS HOMEOWNER
530 Dayton St Michel Construction INC.
CONTRACTOR SCALE'
Michel Construction INC. NTS
DATE PERMIT
11/8/2002 �B'Y'w' Nima M.Moghaddam NO. 9672
DAYTON STREET DUSTING 12" WATER MAIN
STATIC: 96 PSI
NOTES:
1) THE FIRE SPRINKLER UNDERGROND SUPPLY IS DESIGNED PER NFPA 24. u
2) THE PIPING IS CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON.
u
3) THE PIPING WILL BE TESTED AND FLUSHED PER NFPA 24.
4) THE VAULT AND BACKFLOW IN THE VAULT WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE
CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS.
w Quvx r--
cam pw so"=
4 Von on
PIV DETAIL
THRM BLOCK
(KR NFPA 24)
THOM Wt. r[rU%f
(pa NFPffA24)
TYP. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS
@ PIPING CHANGE OF DIRECTION
4- OS&Y VALVE wl OSY—SU-2
TAMPER SWITCH
112- X 2 1/2' X 4' FDC
4' CHECK VA.w/
112' BALL DRIP
4' AMES 300OSS DOUBLE CHECK VALVE
4' OS&Y VALVE wl OSY—SU-2
TAMPER SWITCH
CONCRETE VAULT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 6 2 1/2%2 1/2*x4* FDC
4- UNDERGROUND PIPING
Li 4- UNDERGRMJND PIPING
4
-j
4x4x4 FLG TEE
u
4' PIV w/TAMPER SWITCH 001 t 5/ TRICKLE METER
4' ]DUCTILE
C.MKTE V#""I SEE DETAL
J PLAN VEIW
THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE APPROX 500 GPM
APPROVET
MARTr4EN
cwnK RECEIVED
5 UNIT CONDO
MT L44
SCALE:— --I'=20
r nw CRY
VAULT DETAIL
STREET FILE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
r IQ Sim
"I
, �P-A
l3eccolo
kN & DETAILS
LU
1.
LLI
M
\1
"AIRMIT EXPIRES
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
&Z&2L ak_'574fX7J&Y Me
MAILING AD15RESS
1TQ7 OIZZ Or �5a,
CITY Zip TELEPHONE
VP161L1d5__ 14, fwf, Zr. 776.,9011
NAME
A(la
ADDRESS
NAME
� � zx), go/ 0 "
ZIP ITELEPHONE
�O A
, V6,
USE PERMIT
ZONE
NUMBE22&_&
JOB
ADDRESS,53-zDWW/j ST.
SUITE/APT#
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LID NO.
I
LID FEE S
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Approved
RW Permit Required
Street Use Permit Roq'd
EXISTING — PROPOSED
Inspection Requited
Side.alk Required
REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT
Undorgmund
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
I
I
YES 13 NO 13
1
3
5
REMARKS
z
z
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
Cc ADDRESS F1 'tA
0
7, 7 VZ!
"FIRE,,,REVIEWED BY
DATE
CITY
TELEPHONE
Ak 4�,
UL
4�
.1 NARIANCE OR.CU
�_SHORELINE ORAD0
INSPECTION
OND
1C 1
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION, DATE
REO'D
(3 YES E3 NO
SEPA REVIEW
COMPLETE EXEMPT
SIGWAREA
ALLO111ED*, PROPOSED,,,
HEIGHT
5'-WAL, ED PROPOSED
1OW
PROPERTYTAX ACCOUNT'PARCEVNO.
I—Erb-1000,
I
EXP'
NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH
LOT COVERAGE
REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr.)
"PiOPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.)
ALLOWED PROPOSED'
FRONT SIDE REAR
FRONT. LIR SIDE REAR
ADDITION ? E] COMMERCIA' COMPLIANCE OR,
L
I .*CHANGE OF USE
PARKING:'
PROVIDED
L AREA
]
PLANNING REVI EWE64Y DATE
REMODEL
C]' APARTMENT SIGN
CL
REPAIR o FENC'*E.,.,,.
REMARKS
,,GRADING
CYDS X,� FT)
DEMOLISH 0 TANK OTHER
GARAGE RETAANING WALL
CARPORT ROCKERY-.'�' RENEWAL�',
(TYPE OF US SINESS OR ACT(VITYi EXPLAIN —--
CHECKED BY
TY PE
9f,CONSTR UCTION
OCCUPANT
1
ZA
GROUP
NUMBER
NUMBER'OF _
CRITICAL:
ECIAL INSPEC TOF�,-JAREA��-*,
".. . ,
OCCUPANT
OF
j
DWELLING,,,,,.
I
ARE S
0 8 STORIES
UNITS
NU .0�
REQUIRED
LOAD
DESCRIBE WORW TO BE DONE
REMARKS J,
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER LiBd'108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
z
age" `4
ZeAlb 6aia'u -
All A&7
4,46.
lu�-e
VALLIATION,
Descriptl6w
fFgE
Description
FEE
HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % OPE %
u I I d I Ag� 41�4-,,
47NIOT
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE- 0
j
.
Mechanical
THIS PERMIT AUTH OFILZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
I= BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBUC
a 0
D MAIN SIDEWALKS,
Grading
Recording Fee
(CURBS, DRIVEWAYS i MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
City Surcharge
PERMIT APPILICATION: ISO DAYS
LIMIT! I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
Engr. Inspection
State Surcharge
SEE B ACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
;APPLICANT �N BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Traffic Mitigation
Plan Chk Deposit
N INTEREWAGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND -AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Review
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
Fire Inspection
Total Amount Due,,
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
---rReceipt
Landscapeinsp.,
#
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
APPLICATION APPRCJVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application Is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknovAedged In space provided.
WORKMF
I'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
,
OF I LS SIGN k RE DATE
611 E (rN7OR A07f) DATE SIGNED
[All
771-0220
RELEASED BY DATf
ATTEVION
EXT 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI_
771-0221
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX
ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR
PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
10/01
1%
UTILITY EASEMENT CITY CLERK
CIVIC CENTER
EDMONDS. WA 98020
IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein,
the undersigned, George M. Kallstrom , John g. Kallstrom , and
Barbara Sprinkle - , hereby grant to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal
Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation and
maintenance of a storm sewer over, across, through, and below the
following described property; and the further right to remove trees,
bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the
location, construction and maintenance of said utility or utilities,
together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the
stated purposes.
The easement and right-of-way hereby granted is located
in Section 24, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M.
Snohomish County, Washington, and is more . particularly
described as follows:
The Westerly 5 feet of the East 10 feet of Lot 10, Block
121, Plat of the City of Edmonds; as recorded in Volume
of plats, page 39, records of Snohomish County,
Washington.
TOGETHER WITH A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER THE
aforementioned property. Said construction easement will
end upon the completion of the construction of the storm
sewer, or January 1, 1986, whichever comes first.
THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition
such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance
and repair -of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their
heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure'over, upon,
or within the permanent easement.
DATED this
0- - -/,3
CD 2:
Lr)
Lli
C
'f2
0" co
LJ
S T A T 13.,1, D F -
rM
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
day of
and On this day personally appeared before me ock-b 6"ir, - A //C'
I to me known to be the individual ('s)
described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that signed the same as
free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF
19
'�X'A .1 (91/t
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the St"ate of
WashingtQn, resi ing
at
T"I
2,
LA
L I
NO EXCISE TAX
REOumtr)
JUN '1,,-- 198
PRXI-i4i Ach mish county Ifes ioll
50606- 1 94
13Y VOL 1903PAG11.857
c�
LLJ
0
cr_
0
LJ!
ci�
CITY CLERK V<ECEIVED
CIVIC CEIN'TIER
EDMONDS. WA 0307-0
0 — ENGINEERING
UTILITY EASEMENT
IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein,
the undersigned, George M. Kallstrom ', John K. Kallstrom , and
Barbara Sprinkle - , hereby grant to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a' Municipal
Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation and
maintenance of a storm sewer over, across, through, and below the
following described property; and the further.right to remove trees,
bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the
location, construction and maintenance of said utility or utilities,
together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the
stat-d purposes.
The easement and right-of-way 'hereby granted is located
in Section 24, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M.
Snohomish County, Washington, and is more particularly
described as follows:
The Westerly 5 feet of the East 10 feet of Lot 10, Block
121, Plat of the City of Edmonds, as recorded in Volume
2 of plats, page 39, records of Snohomish County,
Washington.
TOGETjiER WITH A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER THE
aforementioned property. Said construction easement will
end upon the completion of the construction of the storm
sewer, or January 1, 1986, whichever comes first.
THE CITY agrees to restore to, substantially the original condition
such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance
and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their
heirs, or as-Qigns shall not construct any permanent structure overt upon,
or within the permanent easement.
DATED this day of 19
- CA�: _.:
LO V)
BE
CX- U-;
STATqD 0
COUNTY
��n:.� . I
.Nim day personally appeared before
CLLI�14 to me known to be
described in and who executed the within and
acknowledged that _ /k signed the
free and voluntary act and deed, for the use
mentioned.
me - 5�' C'0 !�z e 1*"7 14�2 11IX-C-1t.01.1
-4,
the indi�ridual (s)
foregoing instrument, and
same as '4 /' C
s and purposes therein
19 e, '/ S7' DAY OF
_?DER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS
NO EXCISE TAX
�PEQU)Rt-T')
i U� 198 5
1�e �81/8 8 1
EIRMI-03, SPhomish C0611
13y""-
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the
k�
Washington, resid' at
,5,1 er e
506 06 (.Q 93
.4
VOL
.3PAGE 1856
j�2
61 CITY CLERK
UTILITY EASEMENT CIVIC CENTER
EDMONDS. WA qi9020
IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein,
the undersigned, George M. Kallstrom , Johnj?. Kallstrom , and
Barbara Sprinkle , hereby grant to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal
Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation and
maintenance of a storm sewer over, across, through, and below the
following described property; and the further right to remove trees,
bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the
location, construction and maintenance of said utility or utilities,
together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the
stated purposes.
The easement and right-of-way hereby granted is located
C) in Section 24, Township 27 North, Range 3 East,'W.M.
Snohomish County, Washington, and is more particularly
described as follows:
The Westerly 5 f * eet of the East 10 feet of Lot 10, Block
121, Plat of the City of Edmonds, as recorded in Volume
2 of plats, page 39, records of Snohomish County,
Washington.
TOGETHER WITH A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER THE
aforementioned property. Said construction easement will
end upon the completion of the construction of the storm
sewer, or January 1, 1986, whichever comes first.
THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition
such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance
and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their
heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, upon,
or within the permanent easement.
DATED this day of 19
U')
CD
Uj
0 .,: g�
0*. LO
ze�U:
STAli�. OF, '�WABHINGTON)
Ln CL
00 CD W
COUNVZ 64TPSROHOMISH)
1
On this day personally appeared before me FOY,-)
and to me known to be the individual (s)
described in and who executed the within,and foregoing in t ument, and
acknowledged that P�- signed the same as ... z I
free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS
19"
'P
NOTARY"UBL
Wash toynr
!j j C3
0 . f,
C
8 5060601 9Z
DAY'OF
/ I . . .
and or the State o
d' g t
5 /—:
N() EXCISS TAX
RFOUIRtO
JUN,,.---)G 1985
wish go lie 11911
�1- R 1, 7,
("U, nil , �4-/
BY
VOL 1903 PAGE 1855
I
IECEIVED
P PERMIT EXPIRES
EF
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE PERMIT
ZONE
eln J. C5� NUMBEBQW-e/ Y
,ff 4
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#/
ADDRESS
J�5:5,+ DA
, 4
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO,
OT NO.
LID NO.
LID FEE $
MAILING ADDRESS
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
EXISTING PROPOSED
REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT
TESCP Approved 13
RW Permit Required
Street Use Permit Req'd
inspection Required
Sideivalk Required [3
Underground
Wiring required CI
CITY
-9Zip
4Z�
TELEPHONE
4?,5— 776. Z2,11
x
NAME
4:�_Z)CVOV (416,
METER SIZE. I
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES13 NO 0
Z_
5
ZZ
ADDRESS
2!a 7 Zlzn� 57. -5 - 4j, 111oz-
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
cc
NAME ;-j
Nlewl,e� MC-7164) II&I lk t
Y,,Pz 59, t& 4, 1A, i
I I ENGI - NEERI?RG,
REVIEWED/DATE
Ox 40,ff Lf v---.
ADDRESS
lt)7 Z12,4 5-(, 5� 4�vz,r,
�:FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE
W
cc
M
61TY ZIP,!,
TELEPHONE
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRAT ION. DATE'
(641X:,�f UY, 67 -��4A5�o
VARIANCE bk'du 4'�',;.SHORELINE
OR AD&
INSPECTION
REO'D
13YES ONO
IPBOND
OSTED
z
z
z
CL
SEPA REVIEW—
COMPLETE" "EXEMPT,'
EXP
AREA
"ALLOWED' PROPOSED.,
HEIGHT
:,.,,ALLOWED PROPOSED
4
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCECNO.
z "n
ENTIAL
0 NEW RESID' :PLUMBING MECH
LA,N
ADDITION E] COMMERCIAL COMPIL CE,OR
CHANGEPF USE
REMODEL A , PARTMENT SIGN
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED,.' PROPOSED.
;REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr:i4�
',�,FRONT,, SIDE REAR
PR POSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT. UR SIDE REAR
17)
h ,
PARKING
REO'D PROVIDED.
LOT AREZ7
7PLANNING REVIEW EIJ�14Y' DATE
REPAIR GRADING CYDS FENCE
I _ X:_ FT)
REMARKS
DEMOLISH TANK, OT I HER'
oGARAGE RETAINING WALL
CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL
(TYPE OF USE, BUSINESP,913 ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
CHECKED By
r
TYPE,OF CONSTRUCTION,
CODE
-77"
OCCUPANT
GROUP
R
A
F 9 F
NUMBER NUMBEff.-OF CRITICA F
OF DWELLING ARE
STORIES UNITS.' NU
ff
7
SPECIAL INSPECTOR,
REQUIRED
. 1. YES
,IAREAT,,
OCCUPANT
LOAD
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS.PER UBC 1108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D
r-,V A'
M VIP )*XJ� 71 64,
&WO klwzg�b All .40�2
VALUATION $
Dewription
'FEE
DescriptIon
FEE
Plan Chepk
HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE %
HECK NO: VESTED DATE' fflUITID111y
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS Mechanical
I= BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
a DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS. DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE Grading Recording Fee
t: SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review City Surcharge
PERMrT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
LlMrP I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK 15 STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection State Surcharge
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Traffic Mitigation Plan Chk Deposit
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFX DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY 01
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Review Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY; WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANC Fire Inspection Total Amount Due
0
,I NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO EN I FORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISI= Landscapelnsp. Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECn AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- This applicaflon Is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknovirledged In space provided.
WOR5KEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
.10L_1
OF"ALS SIGNATURE DATE
"GE DATE SIGNED
(A -2 5)
AM A //,11
C , �4 9
V19r 1_-z I :? . a 0 2 jW . U ) :6/
771-0220 J'-/Z 1 D_' E
ATTEWION Elff 1333 RELEASED76-
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI_ 771-0221
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR
10/01 FAX PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
Al.
�RATE RECEIVED
EXPIRES
F
P ERMIT
USE PERMIT.
ZONE
CITY OF EDMONDS
NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS
IS,9 aa v,///
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAM E/SU BDIVI SION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO.
� 1_ � `� - - `-1-12
A ( � �y
A,,;� __ 1'
J\�)� �
LID FEE $
MAILING ADDRESS
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Approved
RW Permit Required
7?0-7 2_V,1_).-�.1' 7-
EXISTING ey�
pROPISED
Street Use Permit Req*d
Inspection Required
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
51dewalk Required
"J"(t" Ar
z-V_15- - 1 -7 6��: 2 22-1
REQUIRED DEDI ...... FT
Underground
Wiring required
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
7NO., OF FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YES)k NO Q
LU
ADDRESS
REMARKS
z
z
x
OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE
(3
0
M
4
—
t*'y- Au, Lius) n I(
z
Lu
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
4 4-+Y�
NAME,
ENGINEERING FIEVIEWED/D E
er ADDRESS
0
1,_ 4.:
FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE
.7,
UJI
M
U.
t- ZIP
Z CITY
0
TELEPHONE
L
4,4�2
VARIANCE OR CU
SHORELINE OR ADB#
INSPECTION
REO'D
"'BIES
BOND
POST ID
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
C ECKED BY
07--
(:] NO
SEPA REVIEW
COMPLET� EXEMPT
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PRO POSED
HEIGHT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL No.
uj
EX P I
NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOS
REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT SIDE,, REAR
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT UR SID A
0, COMPLIANCE OR
ADDITION COMMERCIAL
o
!
z
z
CHANGE OF USE
PARKING
REO'D PROVIDED
LOT AREA
7
PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REMODEL APARTMENT 0 SIGN
/,,-- Im
ox
JTN�j FENCE
C:] REPAIR CYDS 0 X FT)
F.JEMARKS
euj
DEMOLISH TANK OTHER
< 1,( 611
GARAGE RETAINING WALL 0 RENEWAL
z CARPORT ROCKERY
er
r C.)
kTYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
CHECKEDBY TYPE
OF CONSTRUCTION
CODE OCCUPANT
IV-'
VPA
GROUP
NUMBER
M OF
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
CRITICAL
AREAS
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
Aja OCCUPANT
0 STORIE Sj
41f
UNITS
NUMBER
JAP
REQUIRED YES
LOAD d—
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D
cc
I
)
'20 /;w
46 1 '�5 F:� nx,
VAL I UATIO . N I
FEE
1:,�C5:6'K.6 =
PLAN CHECK FEE
7
HE,AT,SOURCE GLAZING % LO PE %
BUILDING
:"-. 1, �: .,- - -
4,
A
PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE
PLUMBING
_910
MECHANICAL
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE P90PERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
GRADING/FILL
a DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
_j SEPARATE PERMISSION.
STATE SURCHARGE
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
ENG. REVIEW FEES
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
Uj ;N INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
i
LANDSCAPING
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
INSPECTION FEE
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
RECEIP Ile"
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
7
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
7'
0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION."
RECEIPI
c
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT,AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
APPLICATION AOPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This.application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WOR�MEN'S COMPENSATIOt.I�SURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
-1
/OR,
SIG'I'AT, E OW;E : IFO I DATE SIGNED
(425)
OFF C S DATE
11,4, 1 RE
lo,
w
771-0220
cw
7ELE BY 'UArE
AS
ATTENt,ION
EXT 333
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
771-0221
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI_
FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109
FAX
PINK -OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
5/98
48'* TYM 2 C3 4e TYPE 2 c o NST
ORIDT REpucep, ip I
AS 5740WA 1b FREVeWr— -c '5734+.�t�fi'YTW
A (IZ Lacr-
5-23-02-
ElEN TION 0410
pipg
. ................................. .........
121% CX-
M H
wAft)lvl !CC 99
L.46op
EX1571NG 10" SANITARY 5 E
- — - — - — - — - — - — - —
CIG &
0 TYPE 11 rj)
INSPEG
CB.
INSTALL QKFED Ar pe 4 Lu
LLIJ) Fop z INOT LL
W4MQoy Pvc z NOTE - THEf CONTRACTOR5HALL REPLACE ALL
1 V.- :3 DAMAGEWCUR15/GLITTER AND SIDEWALK AS
oumpLoui. con-k-4 51"C fv(-e FDC
POST INVICAT4 -Lu IF NE�CES,SAKY :2 IPENTIFIED.1 13Y THE CITY INSPECTOR ADJACENT
TO P9
VO�ED SITE ONLY
role tj) , , , -
59.60 LNiFT 6- 0%
PVC Q�T Pvc @
F nmcpWIDE K Wu,
1EXI TI G 5 EV
2— -mu — — - — — " ^r%l1wv: I Pit/4
cB #1
cew a K
RIM: 95.06
19CYA NOTE: CAP
SIDE
Z, EXISTING
COMPAcTM IUATIU5 (INSTAL.LiD rovil '\ld2 SEWER
41 MI+TM AL INTO EXISTING' ) Enr
3il
—TpEgC�j FILLED a-, pVC)
PIPE et W I -M 3,/+ '/2
cp W45HED GRPYEL 3'-6" ROCKER 2 ol 4
0A PE -A r-MVEL EACH POW
10 -TROUGH OKAIN TO
ID Q
10.00, 'DETENTION TANK
LOOK MAIN W1 OIL
'o EX15TING 10.00,
0501 PVC STOPS 9EP A�RATOR TO. 5.S.
- --------- 0
0 ro
DErENTION PIPE BEOPIV6 OETqlL- EW
N.
5LAL3
N. 6.
DETEN170M -1. 0.5'% EXI5 ING H SE
L ELEV.- 9 TO 15. KEM9 'ED
0 DETENTION SYSTEM
83 LFAo-41 0 ADS N12 iT
IDES16M PREPARED By.*
PIOC ERY DONNA L. BRE
...... SKE9, P.E.
NO TO
RIEVUCERS EACH END P R 6621 FOSTER SLOUGH RD.
-Q1RAGE DRAIN
M:L SNOHONRSH, WA 98296
OIL/WATER SEP.
-5Y5TEM -
80
TO 5ANrrAKY SEWER
-334-99
PHONE: 425
DECIDUOUS TREE
-334-7380
FAX: 425
G TO 15EMOVED
-n
Is
T�K !75
-001
2
'CEDAP, FENCE
REMOVE:..,
TE EASMENT
-12
PROPERTY LINE
ENCLOUSUKE
--------------
Y. 00,
L/ 4
15TING 15 VAULTib
-EXISTING C5
-p
EXI I71NG
6' FENCE (D All T.�
------------- :_ T
--------------------------
R JE
N TAI
rN
F 0'
)AI
u I�
ELDE E
100
A FY: 5 EEN -
-A.
PROPERTY 11NE— E!ror-;:'?Ty 1 ImEr� A 5- n
3'KOCKERY
13Y THE CITY EN*
GINEEKING INSPECTOR' -
MIN 12" COVER' NOTE:
HEIGHT CALCULATIONS OVER PVC W/O 14E,,':
LAALI CPA.-lo-o- -AI I F`APV1kW-- 1kinco
0 ce,� Cr1_1
PLANTINC7 SCHEDULE
AZAELFA
5 GALLON
TSUGA MERTENSIANA/MOUNTAIN HEMLOCK
6_1z
FINUS N*RA /AUSTRIAN FINE
20'
ACER CIRCINATUM / VINE MAPLE
10
CORNUS KOUSA/ KOU5A DOGWOOD
V-19
ACER RUBRUMAUTUMN BLAZE'/ MAPLE
THUJA FIYPAMIDAL15 / PYRAMIDAL15
BERBER15 THUN. / ROYAL 15URGANDY BARBERRY
1 GALLON
HOSTA
I GALLON
PHORMIUM TENAX RUBRUM / NEW ZEALAND FLAX
5 GALLON
PHOOAVENDPONI'UNIQUE
CH015YA TEFNATAf MEXICAN ORANGE
5 GALLON
VINCA MINOP
4" POTS1 2W'O.C.
SPECIAL INSPEC17IONS HAVE BEEN CALLEDTOR ON THIS PROJECT AND
ARE NOTED ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND BUILDING
PERMIT. IT IS THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY
TO ASSURE THAT REPORTS ARE PROVIDED TO T19E CITY IN A 1MVIELY
mA ' NNER. BE ADVISED—iF SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORTS ARE NOT
FORTHCOMING, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ISSUE -A STOP WORK
AND NO CITY INSPECTIONS WILL BE PROVIDED UNTIL SUCH IMVIE AS
THE � REPORTING AGENCY HAS COMPLIED AND REPORTS ARE
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY TEE CITY.
LAWN
ARCTO5TAFHYLO9 UVA-LIR51/ KINNIKINNICK POTS/ 2w, O.C.
C15rUS SALVIFOLIU5 / SAGELEAF ROCKIZ05E I GALLON
PAYERS Or DECORATIVE CONCAETE
TRASH ENCL05UIZE TO BE 5URROUNVED BY O'CEVAK FENCE
IRRIGATION CONTROL PANEL
AP-m
F-1-C-1 At,
60 WATT PORCH LIGHT
HEIGHT (68"
5TYLE # 5L 9486-62
11 �, 1^. 1 A � 1 1/11
SCALE: 1" = 20'
N
ALL NEW, EXTENDED, RE -WILT OR
LOCATED ELECTRICAL UTIUTY AND/OR
RE UND
SERVICE SHALL BE PLACED UNDE1111110
MH
DATUM 100,00
M
to Jpq G� QP i
DAY,IoN s-rl�!EET,
1 1:20 RAMP o. i
Vy"
X15TI�G 51'1*WALKI I I
-1 EX15TINC'471 5IDE% Jxx
-C6 RE1
0
102
1V..W
4�ROCKERY
5'-ro" ROCKERY
DE�K 104
26
OTING HOU0E51
2 TO DE REMOVED
A
A ...... . 4------ `
1060-
X-------
NEW C 4DO
W
4
HA I
- ---ill
FAT 1', 1'
5 FT
CITY UTILITY
EAOMENT
3'ROCKERY
0
HEIGHT CALCULATIONO
A 102.03'
13.105.6,51 1
C 108.12
P-100-=
105,58'= AVERAGE GRADE
DOTTOM FACIA LINE = 13Q.5&
MAX RIDGE LINE = 1255.55
EX15TING TOPO
PROPOSED TOPO
ON 105
DECIDUOL15 TREE5
E
REMOVE 'V' b_ M TO 13EMOVED
6'CEDAK FENCE
.k
XX
ILJ
/ALLEY__ .
I,& -T
A
SiiE/i. L.01 I-PLA
SCALE: 1" = 20'
LOT LINE STAKES MUST
BE IN pLACE AT TIME OF
A�l L 5"1"
lc`i N T R
NORTH 51PE ENTRY WAY
COVERED ENTRY
:13UILDING
.96.5'
13
5!
(S)
1__� - .1 1:20 MAX5LOPE
<
PLAN VIEW
zm,�!E_
�,--
FRONT-
S
SIDE,
REAR
0THF3
HEIGHT
C1
1. LOTS 10, 11, 12, & 13 IN BLOCK 121 CITY OF EDMONDS, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
la.EASEMENTS: 5UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO WEST PROPERTY LINE.
2. PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 0043-421-210-1000.
3. VICINITY MAP (SEE TMS PAGE).
M
4. NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR 5 UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 530 DAYTON EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020.
z
5. OWNER: MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC. - 7907 212TH ST. S.W. #102 EDMONDS, WA. 98026 776-2211.
x
6. CONTRACTOR: MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC. - 7907 212TH ST. S.W. #102 EDMONDS, WA. 98026 776-2211 LIC# MICHECI061D5 EXP. 3.31.02.
7. CONSTRUCTION DRAWING: MICHEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. 7907 212TH ST. S.W. #102 EDMONDS, WA. 98026 776-2211.
8. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: REED & ASSOCIATES, PS 8311-212TH ST. SW. EDMONDS, WA. 98026 778-2793.
9. CIVIL ENGINEER: DENNIS M. BRUCE, P.E. P.O. BOX 55502 SHORELINE, WA. 98155 546-9217.
10. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: DENNIS M. BRUCE, P.E. P.O. BOX 55502, WA. 9.8155 546-9217.
0
11. MORTGAGE COMPANY: GOLF SAVINGS BANK
10
12. LEAD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL/CONTACT PERSON: DWIGHT MCGREW 776-2211.
z
13. ZONING: RM 1.5,15,000 SQ.FT. LOT SIZE, 45% LOT COVERAGE = 4950 SQ. FT.
14. PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE = 4932/11,000 = 45%.
z
15. PROPOSED GARAGE = 5957 SQ.FT.
1.4
16. PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR = 4574 SQ. Fr.
U
1'.0
;:D B�
17. PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR 4573 SQ. Fr.
U)
18. PROPOSED 3RD FLOOR 3704 SQ. Fr.
19. MECHANICAL SYSTEM: (2) BRADFORD WHITE DIRECT VENT GAS HW TANK DSI-4OS6EN 38,000 BTU (90% EFF.) I RADIENT & DOMESTIC.
20. WIND EXPOSURE B, SEISMIC ZONE 3, SOIL: 200OPSF.
21. OCCUPANCY: GROUP R, DIVISION 1, & GROUP S, DIVISION 2, & GROUP S, DIVISION 3, & GROUP A, DIVISION 3. CONSTRUCTION TYPE V/1.
OCCUPANT LOAD: BASEMENT = 30, 1ST FLOOR = 10, 2ND FLOOR = 10., 3RD FLOOR = 8, TOTAL, = 58
22. COMPLIANCE PATH: COMPONENT PERFORMANCE APPROACH = OR PRESCRIPTIVE GLAZING = 13.35% AVE.
23. GLAZING U VALUE =.380, DOOR U VALUE =.400, CEILING R VALUE=38, WALL R VALUE=19, SLAB R VALUE=10.
24. COMPLY WITH UBC 97, UPC 97', UMC 97', UFC 97', VIAC 2000, WSEC 2000, WAC 2000 CHPT 51.20.3100,51;40,51.42,51.44 THRU 47.
25. LOT SLOPE = 7.5% N-S.
26. DRIVEWAY SLOPE = 14%.
17 GRADING YARDAGE = CUT DEPTH 8.9 X BLDG FOOTPRINT 5957 SQ. FT. 27 = 1960 YDS.
28. VARIANCE NUMBER: NA.
29 . CA FILE NUMBER: 00-189 & 00-190.
30. ADB NUMBER: 2001-56. APPROVAL DATE: 6.20.01.
31. SET BACKS: STREET 15'(2), SIDE 10'(2).
32. IMPERV. SURFACE AREA: DRIVEWAY 375.00 SQ. FT. BUILDING 4932.25 SQ. FT. = 5307.25 SQ.F7.
z z
33. HEIGHT CALCS: AVE. GRADE = (A 102.03'+ B 105.63+ C 108.12'+ D 106.57')/4 = 105.58', BOTTOM FASCIA LINE =130.58, MAX RIDGE 135.58.
C (z) <
34. PARKING SPOfS-REQUIRED: 10, PROPOSED: 10, ONE MUST BE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE.
35. ANY NEW G.E. ELECTRIC DRYER VENT PER MFG SPECS.
36. INTERIOR WATERFLOW ALARM NOTIFICATIO14 PER UBC 904.3.2.
<
37. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REQUIRED. CENTRAL STATION SERVICE FOR SPRINKLER/FIRE ALARM MONITORING.
U
38. UBC 9-3 (NFPA-13R) SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQ'D IN UPPER 3 FLOORS OF BUILDING PER UBC 904.2.8, UBC 9-1 (NFPA-13 W/ PENDANT HEADS)
SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQ'D IN GARAGE.
0
z
39. HANDICAP RAMPS W/ SLOPES OF 1:20'OR GREATER SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS AND EDGE PROTECTION PER UBC 3106 (h).
40. SPECIAL INSPECTIOIN REQ'D: (1) SOIL CUTS (2) FOUNDATION SUBGRADE VERIFICATION, (3) PLACEMENT OF SHORING ( . 4) ANY FILL PLACEMENT.
41. SEPERATE PERMIT REQ'D: (1) PL--i R94Bi?4&(2)?4EG1 FIRE ALARM (4) FIRE SPRINKLER. SC—C— L-i s-r +i�oyj=_
42. FLAME SPREAD FOR ENCLOSED VERTICAL EXITWAYS 0-25 CLASS 1, OTFIER EXITWAYS 26-75 CLASS 2, ROOMS OR AREAS 76-200 CLASS 3.
43. PROIDE F&T STOPS PER UBC. 714.
44. DATUM POINT: SAN SEWER MAN HOLE IN THE MIDDLE OF DAYTON 100.00'(ASSUMED).
45. MAX HEIGHT-30', MEASURED FROM AVERAGE ELEVATION OF UNDISTURBED SOIL AT CORNERS OF EXTENDED BUILDING RECTANGLE,
SUBJECT TO FIELD CHECK BY BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
46. TRANSIT SHALL BE SET UP FOR INSPECTOR AT FRAMING INSPECTION TO CHECK HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE.
47. LOT LINE STAKES MUST BE IN PLACE AT TIME OF FOUNDATION INSPECTION.
48. ADDRESS NUMBERS (6" HEIGHT ON APPR. CONTRASTING BACKGROUND) SHALL BE POSTED PLAINLY VISIBLE & LEGIBLE FROM STREET OR
ROAD FRONTING PROPERTY.
49. PROVIDE FIRE ESTINGUISHERS PER UFC STANDARD 10-1.
50. ALL NEW EXTENDED, RE -BUILT OR RELOCATED ELECTRICAL UTILITY & OR SERVICE SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
51 ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIAL SCH 40 PVC OR EQUIV, SDR 34 (ASTM D3TM D3034).
52. ANY REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION, VARIANCE OR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE DEVIATION (HEREINAFTER VARIANCE) MUST BE SPECIFICALLY
0
CALLED OUT & IDENFIUIED. APPROVAL OF ANY PLAT OR PLAN CONTAINING PROVISIONS WHICH DO NOT COMPLY WITH CITY CODE &
co
FOR WHICH A VARIANCE HAS NOT BEEN SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED, RE -QUESTED'& CONSIDERED BY THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICAL IN
ACCORDANCE W/THE APPROPRIATE PROVISION OF CITY CODE OR STATE LAW DOES NOT APPROVE ANY ITEMS NOT TO CODE SPECIFICATION.
53. PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT: WATER CLOSET-15, DISHWASHER-5, CLOTHESWASHER-5, TUB-9 SINK(KIT, LAUN, BAR) -10, SHOWER-6, LAVATORY-21
HOT WATER TANK-5,_EXPANSION TANK-10, FLOOR DRAIN-5, BACKFLOW PROTECTION DEVICE-1, PRESSURE REDUCTION VALVE-1, GREASE
z
TRAP-0, WATER SERVICE LINE-1, HOSE BIB-8 DRINKING FOUNTAIN-0, BIDET-0,URINAL-0 98 + 1 WATER SERVICE LINE.
0
r,A ATTnIATATZTT:ZAVVAt-�ATCT-T.T.�-T-T
A-3-N-IQ 4,P_&9M V -T2,MA I M � �T qj Z I E Q&.1) \1 n r P ya
0-YARD SEPARATION INCREASE(UBC SEC. 505):0 -20 = 0 X 0% = 0% INCREASE MAX. =_0 TOTALALLOWABLE AREA:
U N
21,000 +0 = 21,000 > 14,362 OK. (BASEMENT EXEMPT PER UBC. 504.5) OK.
0
55. COORDINATE WITH FIRE DEPT. FOR LOCK BOX AUTHORIZATION & INSTALL.
wi
T is building is Type a— —1-Hour,
h
Construction.- All bearin
g walls,
non -bearing wallsq. partitions, PT
flOor-ceilingsg roof -ceilings, shaft
enclosures, and individual
col
callus
j
construction in ac
m "A
ust be
protected to 1-hour fire resistive
cordance with
UBC Chs. 6 & 7.
PARKING SPACES REW:
PARKING SPACES PROPOSED:
BARRIER FREE PARKING SPACES.
.CITY OF EDMONDS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
WORKA. J�� g-� OAA_L_��
ADI
OWNIERA`IiCtW—�
APPROVED DATE:
BLDG. OPFICIAL
PERMIT NUMBER
_z
- �:�2L:z
" ILI MA
KV-rICINITY
,r� k-eL �,t,5+
4��+
ve,41 III APPROVED BY PLANNING
6,77nC;,(0S
It
sz:, [I
COVER SHEET.
P1
5ITE PLAN & 13UILDING HEIGHT CALC5
VICINITY MAP
FLOOR AREA 5UMMARY
PROJECT INFORMATION
LAND!5CAFE & LIGHTING PLAN
PLANT OCHEDULE
ENTRY DETAIL
ARCHITECTURAL:
Al
ELEVATION5
A2
GARAGE FLOOR PLAN
A3
FIR'5T FLOOR PLAN
A4
5ECOND FLOOR PLAN
A5
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
A6
ROOF PLAN
A7-9 ELEVATOR DETAIL5
A10
ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL5
STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS:
51
5TRUCTURAL NOTE5
52
FOUNDATION PLAN
55
FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
54
5ECOND FLOOR FRAMING
55
THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
50
ROOF FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
57
DETAIL5
58
DETAIL5
59
DETAILS
CIVIL DRAWINGS:
C1
5TORM DRAINAGE, EROSION
C2
5ITE CRO555ECTION5
"Wo ^ .1
IL
A
A A. �k
11.5.01
REVISIONS:
12.03.01
1.31.02
7,
::7