546 WALNUT ST (2).PDFiiiiiiiiiiiiii
13658
546 WALNUT ST
DECIARAITON OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT I
C
am the ovmers of the following described rcal esmte in thc; City of Edmuds. to wit:
1-07'S 1-Y,
Or '06bN0,0VxjI
/4- t1ol-ow.'r ,� 0,-
MY t4�� C40v1V7,,;I O-C exltf
MIREREAS. the above uuned omum are desirous of invosing I tst: ctive cove=t upon said
pre=jses in com'Pliawe %Lith Section 19.00.040 of the Edu*ods Co===jty Devalopzomt Code-
WnWESSETH: that f6f and in cow;dexatioo of the prczaiscs, the kbove naused,o%mers do
b&reby declare sa4 grAnt to the City of Edmonds u Gmtee the Mowing restrictive covenant, to -wit:
That at the time of the c(ecut;on of this COTEMIlt the Grantom have agreed or the
Ord;n- a the City of Edirrionds pvovide that no building fok multiple family housing m2y be
trec" an subjett property contahling more dvan -F units.
Said Covensat --Un be biodinZ upon all present omd futum owners of said real cstate and their heirs.
suc-cewors and assigns.
",—O,\�Vy J- 7r
DAXED this
ON day of
OTA oe<-- /-V
W Grantor
-A %BI.IG
7 0
IX 1-19-99
OF WAS Grantor
TM DOCUMENT M RECORDED AS ACOURTESY
STATE OF WASIUNGTON) ON�Y. MRST A!AE7W-AJI TITLE 1!,?Q-URANCE Q0
SS. A3SUV.,r'-9 NO LVB'I-LtIrY FOR SUFFICAEACY
COtWrY OF SNONONnM VAL:DTY OR ACCURACY
Oa ibis day pmocally appeared before rne'--�ob;
to me known to be the individuals describ4d �a &&A who
executed within & fort-goiog instrument. and acknowledged OW they signed the unia. as their free and
voluatary act and deed, for the uses and purposes &wxtin mentioned.
under my'hazd and official seAl this C;� 5 f
Y
60kssl C, TPUDY J. CIAI
N N bic
ic and the StiFe of -
gto..
7:4
%4 0 -r,4 Atom, V dwi I
980 . 22-3089z 111CR6FILp,
R E C 0 R D OF C 0 N T A C T S
21
2
22
3
23
4
24
5
25
6
26
2
8
28
RW PERMIT # DATE ISSUED RECEIPT #
9
29
10
30
11
31
12
32
13
PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE
33 1
SS PERMIT DATE ISSUED f/�,?-V(/-(�RECEIPT
14-
PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE
34
1�
35
16
36
37
METER SIZV, PAID $3c90:2 DATE -711111?2� RECEIPT ///,A 191K
18#
38
19
39
20
40
JECT REVIEW CHECKLIST
-7 PLAN CHECK'#:
PROJECT NAME:)—TIA-il
PROJECT ADDRESS:,5 Zn-, RECEIPT DATE:7
IREVIEW �D BY: '(1nitial/Da
PLAN..
�NATER
4 r "le)
COM'MENTS ring:. I -M nr_% QrWCr% lQ, n r- i I r-,
Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment
Conditional Use Permit
Ye's
ADB Requirements
Other Zoning Requirements
Underground Wiring Required
.......................
Lot Slope IS%
........................... ............
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
SEPA Environmental Checklist#F
ydrFa—ulicsPern
T
Tree Cutting Plan
8
Plat/Subdivision Requirements
9
Legal Description Verification
. . . . . .
0]
Quit Claim/Street Dedications
Easements - Public/Private
M,
4j/.4
2-
.... 12:..
Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee
13'
Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee
14
Drainage Plan (On -Site)
Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses
Ilk.
Setback - Storm Drain Line
m,,r
'am
17
Open Ditch - Existing
�-18
i§7
:-:-22
23---
Culvert Required
Culvert Size
Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff
Catch Basin Required
Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access
Sidewalk Required
e-x4.
...
24
Curb & Gutter Required
EX4.
25
Curb Cut For Driveway Required
797
28
Street Paving Required
AJ 0
......
Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required
Street Name Sign Required
................. - - - - - - - - -
. A/ 0
Other Signing Required
. . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. .
:90
Bond Required For Public Improvements
31'..
FEMA Map Check/Water.Table
. ......
A2
Side Sewer Availability
33
%/ ES
Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID #
Create Street File
--oJE
..35
Existing Water M ain Size
36
Water Meter Size!:,,
------ . . . . . . . . .
n
Service Line Siz e
z
38
Water Meter Charge Required
... SO -
Hydrant Required
Hydrant Size Existing
s-ky
AJo
41
Fire Line Charge Required - Sprinkler
IeX4
- -
42
Street Cut
43
Miscellaneous
44-
I
Reviewed By:
FIRE
PLANNING
'3 31
R 11196
ENGINCERTNG
AUG 13 1997
ENGINEERING
PUBCIC W—ORKS —
AUG U 8 1997
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
city of edmWds
land use application
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
COMP PLAN AMENDMENT
El CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
El HOME OCCUPATION
El FORMAL SUBDIVISION
El SHORT SUBDIVISION
El LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
EJ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
El OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT
STREET VACATION
El REZONE
El SHORELINE PERMIT
E3 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE
EXCEPTION
El OTHER
FILE Z NE
DATE REC'D BY
FEE117 bz��tRECEIPT#
HEARING DATE
Ell HE Ell STAFF El PB AADB El CC
ACTION TAKEN:
0 APPROVED El DENIED El APPEALED
APPEAL#
Applicant -A#/61yvv/ Phone 77;�, -Zv
Address &9,2 e100 !2r-
Property Address or Location
Property Owner.*�& Phone
Address
Agent �MM;4e/ 409::�, Phone 176-92/lz
Address :902?- 012�1-4 97-
Tax Acc #4374-2 - 1?A - 014- -, 00 1 S e c! P— Two 714J R n g.
Legal Description
Details of Project or Proposed Use
M TA I'V 5 eA �'p FJA'ffff�
The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the
application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all
damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon
false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or
employees.
The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City 'of Edmonds to
enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting endant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT:; I , 444&/w ;- k.
SSE
11 A M-
-420
v a
n m
'Al
M-A.,Z,7,
_ZNNNt
M
2M'M
I
EA5T ELEVATION
5CALE 1/8" = V-,Y'
!I
0
PLANTING 5CHEPULE
10.0 AZAELEA 5 GALLON
VIDUKINUM DAVIDII/ DAVID VIDUPNUM 2 GALLON
CH015YA TERNATA / MEXICAN OKANGE 5 GALLON
15UGA MEKTEN51ANA/MC)UNI AIN HEMLOCK 61-12,
ACEKCIKCINAlUM /VINE MArLE 6, 10,
F'KUNU5LAUKC)CEKA:30�,/011'OLUYKEt4 18"-21"
WHITE DOGWOOD 12'- 15'
KQCKEW�
JUNIPEPU5 VIPGINIANA 5KYROCKET 12'-15'
BOXWOOD R ELOCATED ROM 517 E
PHODODENDRONPUNIQUE' 24!'-3C'
YINCA MINOK 4!'FOT5/ 24!'OC.
APC1051APHYLO5 UVA-UK611 KINNIKINNICK V'f'Ofel 24" OL.
LAWN
r7KA55-CKETE
I KAE)H ENCLOZ3UKE 10 01: tUKKL)UN DED 5 Yv,* C EL)AK F ENL E
35.50,
HEIGHT CALCULATIOM
1 q4.1 r.
A=103.66
0-97.22
C= 96.62
D= 91.68
TOTAL = 389.19/4-- 97.30
97.30 = AVERAGE GRADE ri 073 F; s
12Z30 = MAX PLATE HT.
127.30 =MAX RI DGE HT.
a.5a
LOT SIZE = 120.00' X 110.00' = 13.200 SO FT
LOT COYERAGE MAX= 45% = 5940 50 FT
LOT COYERAGE PROPOSED n 5940 SO FT
ZONING,. RM 15
:6
LOT SO FT = 13.20011500 = 8 UNITS MAX
7 UNITS PROPOSED
E)CISTIN6 C- ARAGE
E)OSTING CONTOURS
4—A—.1
1-4
/
5 pT#J
X1
14
/11
12
13
14
13 E R E M Oy,
If 4' HIC i ROCKEERY E)11STNG 15IRCH EEAO 136
REM
�Vt
PROPOSED CONTOLJRS
WING HOUSE TO 15E
EXISTNG BlIJ REEI RE ED
ENTRY
;�'oofe .00 W
GRADING.,
1320 CLJBIC YARDS (EXPORT 11001 1:48
MAX
SLOPE 51 14 6//
0 V 20.00'
z
-------------------
4
5
6
7//
93
E)a -'�'�TO D E.
I
Nslal
6
120,00'
- (;;J �
TRA5H
AREA
SEE
LAND-
5CAFE
W HIGH;ZOCrEF
1 1:48
/ M"
If 51-01
5
75.00'
L N U T Q, Q�3 T\\x, E E
E CQN ARY
-7L-
145TING CD
� 0
5TREET
54ro WALNUT
EAST - WEE7T 5ECTION
AT CENTEPLINE OF GAPAGE
PL 1 540 WALNUT
" .00'
, �.,% 5LOPE
6% 5LOPE DPIVEWAY CENT.EP LINE
NORTH - 5OUTH 5ECTION
M.50,
15.00,
IO.Ou I
I
1 53 ro
25.00'
GAPAGE C)00?1\
50EE A�L�K
/GARAGE 5LAD
C
A I ILA71 �rYfl)
The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS M LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
OWNER ........
tA CONTRACTOR PERMIT NO . ....................
.............................................. ........
JOB ADDRESS ...,54.G ....... .1 ...... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT,.N0 . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ....................................
.............
....................................................................................................................... ............................................
2!,P.P-. C-,
PWW-0001-11/75(REV.11/78)
NAMEOF ADDITION ..: ........................................................................ ............................................
WA4.J�4u-T
f
Z" cappock
S' DP.
,VD-1.
48' C.. I -
V/AL 9 U T
G-T.
DATE
......... By..e.01 ..K4a. .............
",W
OV. LOA,
-H AVENUE NORTiI, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 M
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of N.onsignificance (DNS)
DETERMLNATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: New seven unit multiple family building With 2,800 cubic yards of associated
grading; File No. ADB-97-63.
Proponent: Michel Construction Inc_ 8022 212th St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98026
Location of proposal, including street address if any: 546 Walnut Street
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 4121.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a comple' ted environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
xx There is no comment period for this DNS.
This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from
the date below. Comments must be submitted by
Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson
Position/Title: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division
Phone: 771-0220
Address: City of Edmonds, 2505th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Date: r Signature(.��
xx You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 250 5th Avenue North,
Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than utJa �-2 . 1997, by filing a written appeal citing the
reasons.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact JeffTey S. Wilson to read or ask about the
procedures for'SEPA appeals.
xx Posted on A 1997, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services
Building, a nds Post Office.
xx Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist.
ADS9763.DOC Page I o . f2
Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist:
XX. Environmental Review Section XX
Edmonds School District No. 15
Attn.: Bret Carlstad, Planning and Property
Department of Ecology
Manager
P.O. Box 47703
20420 68th Avenue West
.Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400
XI Washington State Dept. of Transportation XX
Community Transit
TSM&P/Land Developer
Attn.: Brent Russell
15700 Dayto ' n Avenue North
1133 164th Street Southwest, #200
Seattle, WA 98133
Lynnwood, WA 98037
XX Stevens Memorial Hospital XX
Michel Construction
21601 76th Avenue West
8022 212th St. SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
Edmonds, WA 98026
Attachments
pc: File No. ADB-97-63
SEPA Notebook
Page 2 of 2
ADB9763.DOC
5/15/97.SEPA
\ I a
1p4.
u
Da"NGCONTOURS
PROPOSEDCONTOURS
20.00,
I
P1.05
Tj
P7-
x97.26
I/ / t.."-Cl, -*" I-,' z "I
z ry f%- n ft vk AD
93.22
T/ ",
6"WATER
APPROVED BY PLANNING
C.O.
f'r
.224 n
�.ROCKERY/
FA
24.00'
T ®r,
f� r
N
5)
550
TEST PIT LOCATIONS 0
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A.
March 11, 1998
City of Edmonds
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
8022 - 212th Street S.W.
Edmonds, Washington 98026
Attn: Mr. Rob Michel
Geotechnical/ Civil Engineer
R E C; F. I VE r�l
FAR I ` 1998
PEROAT COUN!TEl'
Subject:- Geotechnical Assessment .
546 Walnut Street, Edmonds
Proposed Three -Story 7-Unit Condominium
This 'engineering report presents.the results of.a geotechnical evaluation of the
property at 546 Walnut Street, Edmonds, Washington. This assessment was required
by City of Edmonds Building Department.
REFERENCES:
Location Map (figure 1)
Site Layout (figure 2)
Project Plans prepared by Michel Construction, Ins. �R Ec
Site photographs
BACKGROUND:
The property at 546 Walnut contained a single family residence on the overall
rectangular lot consisting of ap proximately 0.3 acres. The previous single family
residence.has been demolished and removed during the Fall of 1997.
It is understood that Michel Construction, Inc., intends to construct a 7-unit
condominium project with lower level off-street parking (see project plans).
ASSESSMENT:
As previously discussed, this engineer has.evaluated the site with the former
si ngle family residence, 'and found no evidence of any geotechnical distress. The
previous residence contained no significant foundation settlements, nor any shifting of
the foundation areas. The site itself revealed no evidence of any soil creep, or
erosional degradation.,'
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN& PERMIT - LEGAL
17814 8thAve.N.W. - Shoreline, Washington 98177 - (206)546-9217 - FAX546-8442
Michel Construction/546 Walnut
Pagetwo
This engineer has been involved in numerous aspects of the adjacent 536
Walnut Street project. The region is underlain by dense to very dense clean sand.
The adjacent project at 536 Walnut encountered no adverse geotechnical conditions
throughout the excavation and foundation phases.
In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, a series of five
soil test pits were dug using a rubber -tired backhoe, on March 10, 1998, under this
engineer�s supervision (see site plan for location of soil test pits.)
The results of all five test pits were similar, namely: Dense to very dense sand.
Test pits were dug to ten foot (10') depths. Test pit walls remained vertical, with no
sloughing.
No ground water was encountered in any of the five test pits.
The findings of the backhoe test pit exploration confirm the anticipated
conditions, as well as the conditions encountered immediately next door at the 536
Walnut project.
CONCLUSION S/R ECOMM ENDATIONS:
Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in
the area, the lot is geotechnically approved for the proposed three-story 7-unit
condominium project located at 546 Walnut, subject to the following conditions:
Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing
pressure: 2,000: p.s.f.
Equivalent fluid pressure of 30 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall
design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer.
For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of
350 p.c.f.
As discussed, this engineer recommends that shoring is not required for
temporary foundation phase, however, it is understood that the City of Edmonds
encourages the use of shoring. Therefore, this engineer has designed a
shoring plan (dated and certified March 10, 1998). This shoring plan
encompasses the use of ecology blocks properly embedded and linked around
the outside of the lower parking foundation wall (see plans).
Michel, Construction/546 Walnut
Page three
Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete
placement.
The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and
spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above
native soils. See the later. sub -section entitled Gener6l Earthwork and Structu�al Fill
for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and
individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-
four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches
below the lower adjacent finish ground surface.
Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required
below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill
the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least
as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width.
For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot
wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation.
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per
square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used
when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is
anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent,
native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half
inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may beresisted by friction between
the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure. , acting on the
vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the , ,
foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill
placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We
recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to
lateral loading:
Parameter
Desian Value
Coefficient of Friction 0.55
Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f.
Michel Construction/546 Walnut
Page four
Where:
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot.
(2) ' Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density.
We rec ommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the
foundation's resistance to lateral loading.
SLABS -ON -GRADE:
Slab -on -grade floors may, be s.uppprted on undisturbed, competent native soils
or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported'on the existing soils provided these
soilsban be recompacted prior to placement of the free. -draining sand or gravel
underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should bea minimum of four (4)
inches thick. We also recommend using 6.vapor barrier such as 6-.mil. plastic
membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12- inches for sealing purposes
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS:
Retaining walls. backfilled on one side only should be'designed to resist lateral
earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following'
recommended design paramet ' ers are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height
which restrain level backf.ill:,.
Parameter Design Value
Active Earth Pressure* �O p.-c.f.
Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f.
Coefficient of Friction 0.55
Soil Unit -Weight 125 p.c.f.
Where:
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot
(2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid
densities.
For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall
height, a, uniform lateral pressure of one.hundred (100 p.s.f. should be
added to the active equivalent -fluid pressure).
Michel Construction/546 Walnut
Page five
. The values given above are to be used ' for design of permanent foundation and
retaining,walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing
the wails. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and
sliding.
The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures
behind the wails and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above
the walls. If these. conditions exist,� then those pressures ' should be added to the above
lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will
need to be given -the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the
ap propriate design earth pressures.
Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and
foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the w*all, unless the walls are
designed for the additional lateral press ures resulting from the equipment.. Placement
and compaction of retaining -wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated
equipment.,
Retaining Wall Backfill
.Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation -walls
should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should
contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater
than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve
should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt
content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage,composite, such as Mirafi
and Enkadra in, shouldbe placed against the retaining walls. The drainage
composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the
purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the
retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure.bbhind
the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains
recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind
retaining and foundation walls.
EXCAVATION AND SLOPES:
In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the, limits specified,in local,
state and national government safety, regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of
four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a
height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1
(Horizontal: Vertical). from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under
specific recornmen.dat.ions by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts
Michel Cbnstruction/546 Walnut,
Page six.
may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be
inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is
important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors
should be made aware of this potential hazard.
Water should not be* allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary
or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an
appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the
surficial layer of soil.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS:
Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls.
These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches 'of one -inch -minus
washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or
similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as
low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and
surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system.
No groundwater was observed in any of the five test pits during the field
exploration. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation
occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site
by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps
interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation.
The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off
the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any
area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed
slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas
adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2)'peecent away from the building,
except where the areaadjacent to the building is paved.
GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL:
The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of
all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped
or removed. materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural
fill.
NOTE: Specific clearing limits to be established at pre -construction meeting
with City of Edmonds Building officials. At the date of this report, the site appears to
have been properly cleared and ready for excavation phase.
Michel Construction/546 Walnut
Page seven
. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent
retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the u ' nderlying soils needs to
support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after
excavation prior to placement of any structural fill.
All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or
near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture
content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of
fill soils is.very important and must be- closely controlled during the filling and
compaction process.
The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type,
compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case
should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table
presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill:
Location of Fill Placement
Beneath footings, slabs or walkways
Behind retaining walls
Beneath pavements
,Minimum Relative
Compaction
95%
90%
95% for upper 12 inches of
subgrade, 90% below that level
Where:. Minimum relative compaction is, the ratio, expressed in percentages, of
the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in
accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor).
Use of On -Site Soils
If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils
are wet, site preparation costs,may be higher because of delays . due to rains and the
potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are
moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of
these soilsexceeds the optimum moisture content.
Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and
"pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater
than the optimum moisture content.
Michel Construction/546 Walnut
Page eight
Ideally, structural fill which is to' be placed in wet weather should consist of a
granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage
of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil
passing the three -quarter -inch sieve.
The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper
organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering
inspection.
SHORING:
As discussed-, this engineer recommends that shoring is not required, however,
it is understood that City of Edmonds, recommends shoring be utilized during the
temporary foundation phase of this project. Refer to shoring plans by this engineer
dated March 10, 1998. The shoring utilizes proper placement of ecology bloc ks that
will be left embedded in the subgrade after the lower level foundation wall has been
completed, and proper backfill has been placed.
DRAINAGE CONTROLS:
No drainage problems were evident at 546 Walnut Street, Edmonds. Surface
runoff flows generally northerly into the existing City of Edmonds drainage system.
This engineer has prepared the required drainage calculations and drainage plan
(see drainage plan).
CONCRETE:
All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls,
etc.) sh'all have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete
MIX.
INSPECTION:
The recommendations of this report are only valid 'When key geotechnical
aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction:
- Soil cuts
• Foundation subgrade verification
• Placement of shoring
• Retaining wall, or rockery placement
• Any fill placement
• Subsurface drainage installation
Michel Construction/546 Walnut
Page nine
SUMMARY:
The proposed three-story 7-unit project at 546 Walnut Street,
geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the
herein, compliance with City of. Edmonds approved plans and requi
geotechnical inspection during construction.
STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK:
Edmonds, is
recommendations
rements, and key
The plans and specifications submitted to the Cit' of Edmonds have been
y ,
reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and
report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during
the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area
disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the
potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and
from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal.
CLOSURE:
The findings and, recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other
warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results
of the field exploration and'.interpolation -of subsurface conditions between explored
locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different
than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the
situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
)ennis M. Bruce, P.E.
3eotechnical/Civil Engineer
DMB:vIb
IT
L I a*
L 4 wit MI. .a *I MAPLEWOOD c a
It i,T,
00 a
DiTuo-vis 111f.1111 (a, pl, .3
a.
LP-j
-A' s.
c4sptq IT
100111
.STA 11.
CASCAO%.
LIR as twoo
MAPIL
c No --* i_
BXACKrM LANDIM BEACH AL "A r"s 4 SCHOOI, 3"
S CAROL 201-0 .. 1,. g I i 1
P, SAITIT, a 101.0 PIL
143%o
IT �00
V"fJr*ATER PARK c
$?I.
4
0,41.11
M? %few
00.1" ow 1.
pt ITT
IT a a G,�� Spallaut- %
FMING PIER 0 0 . -% 0 Jost.
jal-ft a. I
tc-t* UMPAINGSIAD MIL
c DOE
PK C
sp
PINE
oft" at PARK
lool.
ft
AT op mus
&,. a, i III a.
oft
OLT IACII
PORT (WEDMORM It ^IT c
NAPLI W,
-DMO DS
MEMORIAL
104 0 L vt�,, �YOST AND POOL
SOUAAJ PARK
MAXVIIA
P,
a
'AU
ACH PARK Do %pa Eq
.'Iftmor simm", %pauct
LAtM 0
4. 0 g wi, tol
city'.. A
Pt 11411" PL It
PARK
IT ; ols
- ; Sol. ST) :
It 01111. at S.,
3 1W.,ft
WAXDS P013yr P
440%.T to -j PI 1.
a 'o
c a 44 CPAS
it : T.
,E
0
ELI
a,
T at IV,. .0
#.a
no
4L _j
t It
0- S A r�i, 7�flj a—
all.t4to LA ILM a I a.
at el —1 ..... I
EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPOSEDCONTOURS
20.00'
X 1.05
/tP.il 2
RO-CKEPY/
Tir,
9722 c, 4rlr�
xS7.26
...............................................
93.22
'I r-O.
I !:,gl
®r�
Pop pop
/ ' * I X 4
G.. ATER LINE\ / i -
r.2211 1 11 1
24.00'
530
ui
TEST PIT LOCATIONS 0
0 =. ?Pgl. i:::.
Gu
LIA)
,j / L)
U(
WA
lAf q 04
/v
LAJ
AP
15 7"
Cr, A., TIC
Zo/
j A(C-c/ �16 rzo
(0) /11LI 6!
R E C V E-�"
MAY 2 2
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GTR--
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPROVED BY PLANNING
Z
W,
a 6,vl 1-7�1,) 61Y
I
IR
CITY OF ED1100NDS -1
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
WORK 1--rl-vee
ADDRESS
OWNER
APPROVEED DATE:-,-5--2-3-00
BLDG. OFFICIAL I-JL1j?4
PERFOOT NUWJBER
CITY OF EDMONDS
18 9 0 c�
Address of Construction:
Property Legal Description (Include all easements):
0
Owner and/or Contractor:
State License No.
0 Single Family
Multi -Family (No. of Units
0 Public'
q0 %-DA)k5
SID.E-. SEWER. PERMIT
PERMIT N 0- .1897.2
Building Permit No.
Invasion into City Right -of -Way:' No 11 Yes
RW Construction Permit No:
Cioss other* Privat e P.roperty: No El Yes
Attach legal description and copy of recorded easemen
ZO-12
I certify that I have read and shall comply with all city requirements Date
as indicated on the back of the Permit Card.
P" A,14*�i.
'CALL D,IAL-A-DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY- EXCAVATI'ON�-k-,
OFFICEMSE ONLY
FOR INSPECTION. CALL 7M-3M, PUBLIC WORKS. DEPT.
77/-OAI�
Permit. Fee: 0 issued By
Trunk Charge:
Date Issued: 5/
Assessment Fee: Receipt No.:
Lid No.:
Partial Inspection: Date —Initial
Comments
Reason. Rejected:- Date. Initial
Final Inspection Approved: Date 0 n i t i a I C—
t
PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE
White Copy: File Green Copy: inspector Buff Copy: Applicant
Re�ised 3!90
Side Sewer Drawing
The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO . ............................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS M LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO.- ...............
1 11 - j - 1%
OWNER------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR ...... 7 ................................ PERMIT NO.
?- o &- zqt./5-
JOB ADDRESS ...... S-Y-4101 ------- (1 0. 6- .......... ..................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ....................................
..... --- ----
NAMEOF ADDITION .......................................................................................................................
W0Au+ S+l
4.
'3
SLIC 0';:79W
15
L . 4 z
4
Va V
Approved:
r-- - --- - - -- -,-
EDPA01\41DS
TRE-�'J-UtENT PLAjNT-1
PWW-000 1 - 11/75 (R EV. 11/78) DATE ...... /0. -.. I Y. -.12 ............ By
'416 ..... I, ............
0 Z/' 13
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
BARBARAFAHEY
MAYOR
Rm� COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works Planning/Building Parks and Recreation Engineering Wastewater Treatment Plant
C.
February 20, 1998
A"d d&
a/v
Michel Construction, Inc.
8022 212th Street SW
Edmonds, Washington 98026
SUBJECT: Prolio (A -97-063)
-sed 7 Unit Condominium at 546 Walnut Street DB
Plan Check 97-212
Dear Rob:
The Engineering Division has completed additional review of the subject proposal.
The following revisions must be completed before construction approval can be
authorized:
1. See comments on storm water calculations submitted 2/18/98 and 2/24/97.
2. ADS pipe is not permitted under areas traveled by vehicles. The profile on sheet
C-2 already shows one section of CMP.
When the revisions/corrections are completed, the originals will be ready for
construction approval. Please submit a construction cost estimate to establish bonding
requirements. Also, submit the final drainage report and one set of revised plans
showing the additional information. If there are any questions do not hesitate to
contact Don Fiene at 771-0220.
Sincerely,
JAMES C. WALKER, P.E.
City Engineer
JCW/GCH/cmc
c: Laral Kn�ak
- Rob Michel
7063C.DOC
Incorporated August, 11, 1890 e
Siste:Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
CITY OF EDMONDS
BARBARA FAHEY
V-'
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works - Planning/ Building o Parks and Recreation Engineering Wastewater Treatment Plant
January 30, 1998
Michel Construction Inc.
8022 - 212th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98026
Subject: Proposed 7 Unit Condominium at 546 Walnut St. (ADB-97-063)
(Plan Check 97-21?1
Dear Rob:
The Engineering Division has completed additional review of the subject
proposal. The following revisions must be completed before construction
approval can be authorized:
1. See comments on stormwater calculations.
2. ADS pipe is not permitted under areas traveled by vehicles. The profile on
sheet C-2 already shows one section of CMP.
3. Show required filter fence on west property line and in legend.
When the revisions/corrections are completed, the originals will be ready to
approve for construction. Please submit a construction cost estimate to establish
bonding requirements. Also, submit the final drainage report and one set of
revised plans showing the additional information.
If there are *any questions, do not hesitate to contact Gordy Hyde at (425) 771 -
0220'.
Sincerely,
James C. Walker, P.E.
City Engineer
GCH/JCW1sf
c: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator
7063B.DOC
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
April 21, 1997
Planning Division
Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinato 170
Michel 7 Unit Condo at 546 Walnut St. (ADB-97-063)
The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The
following comments apply:
1 . Stormwater requirements'per Ordinance 3013.
2. Construct and paint curbs to separate vehicle and landscape areas.
3. Sidewalks and curbs on Walnut to be inspected by City. Developer to
replace as determined.
The Engineering Division reserves the right to make additional comments
and requirements on forthcoming submittals for this project., The applicant will
need to comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application is
complete
CnT OF EDMONDS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
ADB97063.DOC
tz? C. 1 B913
August 5, 1997
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works - Planning/ Building * Parks and Recreation Enginee
Michel Construction Inc.
8022 - 212th St.' SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
Subject: Proposed 7 Unit Condominium at 546 Walnut St.
ADB-96-063) (Plan Check 97-212)
Dear Rob:
BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
,eatment Plant
The Engineering Division has attempted initial review of the subject proposal. There are
substantial omissions in the submittal. The following information must be provided so that
staff can adequately review the plans:
1. Provide information regarding sewer and water service to building. Submit plans showing
proposed locations. Underground parking must have connection to sanitary sewer.
2. Provide dimensions on civil plan for drive aisle location, curbs, etc.
3. Provide storm water calculations.
4. Show proposed parking dimensions and locations.
When the revisions/corrections are completed, please submit three sets of revised plans
showing the additional information requested. If there are any questions, do not, hesitate to
contact Gordy Hyde at 771-0220.
Sincerely,
James C. Walker, P.E.
City Engineer
GCH/JCW/sf
c: Lara Knaak
7063.DOC
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Cities International - Hekinan, Japan
BUI LOING
A U 6 - d 419.9
03/25/1998 15:15 7789086 MICHEL CONST PAGE 01
IMICHEL,
CONSTRUCT1014.9 INC.
0022 21 ZTM ST. qWj LOMON09, WA SWIG
FAX #(425) 776-9056
PHONE(425)776-2211
-.FAX
DATE;
y
FROM: ROB MICHEL
REGARDING.,
ORIGINA L TO BE MAILED: YES
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING T141S COV9ft PAGE:
0 miamEclosloo
03/25/1998 15:15 7789086 MICHEL CONST PAGE 02
11� C. 1% 41,
Date Posted
Date Expires
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOP
121 ;,;TH.AvENUE NOFfrH * EDMONDS, VVA 55OZO 0 t4Z5) 771-D220 - !'^X (495) 771-021.1
COMMUNiTY SERVICES DEP.ARTMFENT
Pubho Works a Plan n inglBuildi nQ 0 ParkS 2nd Recrestion a Engineering * Wai3tewater Treatrnent Plant
Edmonds Subdivision/Plat/Permit No, P44-AJ _!� 7 - V_ / Z_ I dQz3_97-4-3
Pr JorA Nam 7
01
Project Address -5'4L /, P(1.4 9-/ r L-5 7.
Owner/Developer/Contractor Al'tmc-�t
With reference to the above -identified matter, this will certify that this institution has a savings
account (or loan) for the above -referenced developer for the project so identified. In consideration of
the permitted dcvclo1=cnt of the property, and in lieu of a performance bond, this -institution hereby
agrees that it will freeze the sums of money for the indicated site improvements pending written
authorization for release of said funds by the City of Edmonds in the amount of $__/� _V 0 0 -,
The total sum indicated will be withheld by . this institution from any disbursements of any kind until
written authorization has been received by the institution from the City of Edmonds to release the sunk:,_.. --
of money indicated by the written authorization from the City.
The design, location, nuterialls and other specifications for the indicamd site improvements are
those required by the City of Edmonds as appcar in the abov&-referenced Edmonds file and in
compliance with Chapter 17. 10 ECDC of said City.
In the event the ownerldeveloper/contractor fails to complete the indicated improvements within
6--t- the City of Edmonds inay demand, and the institution shall make,
payment to the_rl� of said funds so that the improvements can be installed or completed immediawly
to City standards. The institution shall not be liable to the owner for any disbursement of said -fimds to
the City of Edmonds.
it is hereby specifically agreed by and between the parties hereto that in the cvcnt that any lcgal
action must be taken to enforce the provisions of this bond or to collect said bond, that the prevailing
party shgll be entitled to collect its cost and reasonable attorneys' fees as a part of the reasonable costs
of securing the obligation hereunder, In the event of settlement or regolution of these issues, prior to
the Ming of any suite, the actual costs iucurrcd by thr. City, inclading rmonable attorneys' fcts, shall
be considered a part of the obligation hereunder secured. Said costs and reasonable legal fees shall be
recoverable by the prevailing party, not only from the proceeds of this bond, but also over and above
said body. as a part of any recovery in any judicial proceeding, in addition to reccovery of the bond.
Incorporated August 11, 1990 0
5iste:Cittes International — Kekinan, Japan
03/25/1998 15:15 7789086 . MICHEL CONST PAGE 03
City of Edmonds
Peffo�ynsnce Bond - Frozen Fund
Page 2 LYNNWOOD MORIGAGE 0000RATION
P.O. BOX 5U7
LYNOW00% WA Wo
APPROVRD..
NAMWF FINANCILAAk;WS OWNERJI)EVELOPERICOXIFACTOR
/14 M /,/ - f
9 1 X Ln-111LOW - --1/ ___CFO owl
OFfICE-11 SIG*��TL!E� SIGNATURE OF ABOVE
INSTITUTION MAILING ADDRESS
CITY/STATE/ZIP
eo '5z
MAILING ADDRESS
E�n��Iy?s
CITY/STATE/ZIP
ACCEPTED:
PHONE Crr� OFEDMONDS ENGINEERING
Al" -�51qb -
ACCOUNT NUMBER DAft
STATE, OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF
On this day of jz;.7e' 19 *1�r, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washingtot, duly commissioned and sworn. persongly appeared
�TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE' C - F - C>
TITLE
of, 4 #'OF -7 &VCP&91 <Aq�ewf 6%z the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION-/
and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the
uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that was authorized to execute said
hwrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS'my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written.
KRISTIH G. PEPPIN.
PEP
G. 301 P114
— 7
TIM
ST4TE OF WASHIKION
y
-��TAY PUBLIC fo- t e
Lu
State at
B6NDPF".r)0C
PAMW 09/%
.MICHELI
CONSTRUCTION9 INC.
8022 - 212TH ST. S.W. * EDMONDS, WA 98026
SITE DEVELOPMENT
COST ESTIMATES
SITE LOCATION:
546 WALNUT ST
7 UNIT
PLAN CHK
97-212
START DATE:
3/5/98
COMPLETION DATE:
1/15/99
CONTRACTOR: MICHEL CONSTRUCTIO?
776-2211
ROB
DESCRIPTION:
QUANTITY
COST
TOTAL
-UNIT
CURB,GUTTER &SIDEWALK
(Ln. Ft.)
25
$21.60
$565.00
EXTRUDEDCURB
120
$2.00
$360.00
PAVING
(Sq. ft)
2200
$0.90
$1,980.00
SEWER
(Ln. Ft.) 6"
36
$5.80
$208.80
81,
0
$6.90
$0.00
STORM DRAINAGE
6" pvc
4
$5.20
$20.80
DETENTION pipe
200
$18.00
$3,600.00
CATCH BASIN
4
$420.00
$1,680.00
12" CMP
0
$12.20
$0.00
OTHER:
EROSION CONTROL
$200.00
TEMP DRAINAGE
$250.00
TEMP ENTRANCE
$300.00
Sub TOTAL:
$9,164.60
Contingency
20%
$1,832.92
TOTAL:
$10,997.52
411 aaa —
0.02,Z
#MICHEC1060S
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
I I Lsw-� COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works Planning/Building- Parks and Recreation Engineering Wastewater Treatment Plant
November 4, 1997 0
Michel Construction Inc.
8022 - 212th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98026
Subject: Proposed 7 Unit Condominium at 546 Walnut St. (ADB-97-063)
(Plan Check 97-212)
Dear Rob:
The Engineering Division has completed additional review of the subject proposal. The
following revisions must be completed before construction approval can be authorized:
1 . S�e comments on storm water calculations.
2. Add note regarding sidewalk, curb and gutter.
3. Water m * eter is to be installed in public right-of-way.
4. Show parking stalls.to be delineated on street.
5. Show yellow curbs to be painted.
6. Show parking stalls, if required, at end of drive entry.
7. Provide invert elevation on existing storm drain line.
When the revisions/corrections are completed, please submit two sets of revised plans
showing the additional information requested and the revised drainage information.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact Gordy Hyde at 771-0220.
Sincerely,
940979- C. 09/Ak
James C. Walker, P.E.
City Engineer
GCH/JCW1sf
c: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator
7063A.DOC
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 9
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
I - C)")
'4 C. 19
August 5, 1997
QITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA. FAHEY
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works Planning /Building Parks and Recreation Engineering Wastewater Treatment Plant
'Lie
Michel Construction Inc.
8022 - 212th St. SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
Subject: Proposed 7 Unit Condominium at 546 Walnut St.
ADB-96-063) (Plan Check 97-212)
Dear Rob:
&-,J' -P-J S"15-19 7
The Engineering Division has aftemptdd initial review of the subject proposal. There are
substantial omissions in the submittal. The following information must be provided so that
staff can adequately review the plans:
1. Provide information regarding sewer and water service to building. Submit plans showing
proposed locations. Underground parking.must have connection to. sanitary sewer.
2. Provide dimensions on civil plan for drive aisle location, curbs, etc..
3. Provide storm water calculations.
4. Show proposed parking dimensions and locations.
When the revisio ' ns/corrections are completed, please submit three sets ' of revised plans
showing the,additional information requested. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to
contact Gordy Hyde at 771-0220.
Sincerely,
James C. Walker, P.E.
City Engineer
GCH/JCW/sf
c: Lara Knaak
7063.DOC
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
I,? C. is 9'�'
August 5, 1997
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works - Planning/Building - Parks and Recreation e Engineering - Wastewater Treatment - Plant
Michel Construction Inc.
8022 - 212th St. SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
� ON CO. Py
,
Subject: Proposed 7 Unit Condominium at 546 Walnut St.
ADB-96-063) (Plan Check 97-212)
Dear Rob:
The Engineering Division has attempted initial review of the subject proposal. There are
substantial omissions in. the submittal. The following information must be provided so that
staff can adequately review the plans:
1. Provide information regarding sewer and water service to building. Submit plans showing
proposed locations. Underground parking must have connection to sanitary sew . er.
2. Provide dimensions on civil plan for drive aisle location, curbs, etc.
3. Provide storm water calculations.
4. Show proposed parking dimensions and locations.
When the revisions/corrections are completed, please submit three sets of revised plans
showing the additional information requested. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to
contact,Gordy Hyde at 771-0220.
Sincerely,
James C. Walker, P.E.
City Engineer
GCH/JCW1sf
c: Lara Knaak
7063.DOC
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
F DECLARATION OF RESTRIC= COVENANT
am Lbe aAmem of ffic following described real c=te in tho City Of Edmonds. to wit:
0
OF 70
7 71e 1A 76� CCalv 7,y Of CO'r- ""t
SVRERE4S. the si>ove unmed o,%ucrs Am d&=r= of unposuig I remctive ewe=t upon saJd
pn=o:iws in com'Pliance urith Section 19.00.040 of tbc rA=ods Co=x=xilty Developmcnt C*de-
WnWESS=- that for and in cow;deratiott of the premises, the &bove naused o%mers do
boereby declam and grunt to the City of Edmon& as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit:
That at tEw time of the execut;on of this COTemnt the Grantors have agreed or the
Ord;naxice of the City of E&nonds providt that no bufliUng fok multiple fwnily houying mzy be
trec" on subjext property containing more dan ? - tMits.
Said Covaust AuD be bindinZ upon &D present and fi=m owners of said rwA c=ate and their heirs.
Successors and assi*gns.
D'y . j - 0
ION DAXED this ' 9j' day cd
0 A&
Granwr
Of WA S C-� Cr2ntor
THIS DOCUMENT M RECORMD AS A COURTESY
STATE OF WASFUNGTOM ONLY. FIRST A!AV��l TIT!.E 1?�-SURANCE rO
AZ�SLI.VEES NO LVB*.-L;yy FOR S(JFFIC4Er4CY
cou.N-ry Or VoHohmm) VAL-6)';-, Y OR ACCURACY
On L4is 42y personally appeared before Trw,'--R'b rn
-jibed ii; aad who
to me )=own to be the individuals des,
exacured widlin, Lhe forr-goiug iustrument. and acknowledZed that they signed the sania as their free, and
voluntary w and deed, for the uses and purpow therein mcn6oned-
GTT.N uoder my 'bud and official 5eal this C—;� 51"-Ielf — F0
%it n Vy
TPUDY J. CIZA /'Y
I W
lc�� and Vr the
No-r,4o,7� SEon' d'
4 1 i
W
3'
of -
PLANNING DATA
NAME: —/-
SITEADDRESS: 54 V-9"L-1— DATE: YL-7�
ZONING: Ov I,C'-Z.
PLAN CHK#:- 2,1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 0,0 7- #j&,77
CORNER LO (Yes/No) FLAGLOT X)b (Yes/No)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: /5-- Left Side: Right Side: Rear: /5-
Actual Setbacks:
Front: - /!;- Left Side:-10 Right Side: Rear: 15�-
Street map checked for additional setback required? - (Yes/No)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED_) --(Y/N)
LOT COVERAGE:
Maximum Allowed: ly C 0119 Actual:—+��
BUILDING HEIGHT:
S W
�— " -ve
V0
Maximum Allowed:1'27.3 Actual Height: 12'7.15 t-3 F-cwt 0.4cuVyrv*t
Datum Point: �-te-w SYR- A Datum Elevation: 8-7,9;7 0
A.D.U. CREATED?: Lo
SUBDIVISION: k)—b
CRITICAL AREAS #:CA Jf7— 30
SEPA DETERMINATION:-f-,&V4,--7zr c..) Itf.
LOT AREA: /1
OTHER: LA-A.)y5;eaic' 0,.:�s.V '�ft-7,1, CDC--,
Plan Review By:
c.,V11es\perm1t%^p1&ndaLdoc