555 ALDER ST.PDF0
iiiiiiiiii lill
10050
555'ALDER ST
i
CITY OF EDtSDS
III Plect 6-1107 when vvft
CIVIC CENTER — WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT Is ready for inspeetion. (No Inspee,
tions Saturday, Sunday or holidays.) N 2 1153
SIDE SEWER PERMIT. okmr r-or
-5ss- 11 zj i REt i FILE
ADDRESS ...................... � -&3-1—&-5�3-3 Alder Street
... .................................. ...... ................... ...............................................................................................................
OWNER ............ An.dre.w ... N.e-s.h.e.im ....................... .................... CONTRACTOR ..........................................
.... ....... .. - - � I . .. ..... ---- .................................
Permission is granted .......... Amwt ... �Lq- ........... 19-j54, for ...................... days, to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
with City Sewers In accordance with application on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. I —The owners of the property may obtain a. permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before It has been inspected.
NOTE No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
IsNo. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%.
No bends In grade sharper than % will be permitted.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches In street must he water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to Improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
0, No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, o r to do any work on the main sewer or its ap-
purtena,nces except to Insert the pipe into the wye.
1 .0
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE) #: udiff .02Z
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS #: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver
LJ-1
Study Required aiver
W—W
CRITICAL AREAS #: DETERMINATION: El Conditional Waiver
El Study Required El Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORD FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER - list permit #'s): 0,�-022D Pr
wi)
10�5
- U�A JAM) ZME2 DiO(O I OUM�) 2M
0116-1
UM6�)
. I
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: (
I
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
(Duz
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE:
LOT. -
BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: ff6
-
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE/ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
FOR:
:'WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
L:\TEMP\DST's\Forms\Jana's Street File Checklist 5-14-08.doc
Jim
A'5
y
.0,
LL)
640220
NU.4BM-R'
rm d
n 1n8Ai*pep1T1iea%7 Lines
Widi"j1d' it-40plic
NAME (0R'NAmlr,pF
A-0 D f?_?� I
_y RD—
C4 _1L CK-
F'YA ft '**" - * 1.� I .. I __ f
B I D�.�.. Y RST
FRIO �2 4
ONT— N
'At4T 81
WAT�N 4
�L) 00 xz-$ (j �40 0,
7
N:AM E
4r, _7
Z
w -:xpD"- Ll?�NG HLITBAC
x TO. EAVF UNES_
. - - -z -1-" '.�) 1"'UPTE:'
CIT
CuBrA
7"w Tfzo
K!1� c
GRAD c
z
R"
T.r.8 n NO
_x.LEP1l0NE__Nu1iBy.K ALZE 1z CL� CE' W'
'77
t Y
'<J
'e— 747. L
�4 Um
4"
t1z
LOT
7;
t
ai
PER �ftgT PEPWIT lq2 �E'
av-mw PROVF�D
Ij -PE
oj� qpNST�V(Mq�N'
y
C X9
3.
z OP
'C
L -11415PE
'PLAN"CRECKMI) 13Y
v 'WOPLIC'To BZ MNE'-
Tbr�
wo.-or a-Loqi,
2 3m,
-VALU4TIO
16
�NUUB
:L—j
N FLUMBLIM
FX
ADD
q
&
ER OP PFP.MX
A.L'F;;R KU'M, T 77p�
PWEL".N'G
rf cz;�I'Rzal z v bm ux rra
5i
mg9i4-�PN pL
7
F!AIR V,
4paV f�UUL'f /ki '�V.
-APPROV4.v,
ATION
bmt�y, A P FLIC
F�4 agoot of the one,., 04f" to coroply, w1th c!ty pj atoq �myrf.reo,, Tills rnlimm T.hrl# 4pp
'jj'*'tj
gn is no 4 pp
&D4 �i doic ftqthorlti�-d 0!t�y,. Rq P*r�qm Ali 11441W rSig7ned ' ; I
laung opmm"01?n: - F t�kp .9rk . "Q_ by.fhe D�r"tor pf Buil specm
ivuj.�e employed in of tb@'LaborrCbd mhIngloa MAY n!E ont 3�n_
q.pf tj�o Stoto of W
P�N . tion ee
_Qr hisideputy; and f i are Oald. and
:.r,e I c nowledged in, f1ptice providod.
_qP pt Is a. )<,
N6TE:: PERMIT LIMIT ONE YEAR
'PA� Tx CONED`
Tug D 1;P A;kT`bC.EJ*VT
cl-Tv 6F
r-3ATE
Im'OT A
-7
lluj IN
P
tEAK A
a
"V,
-0.
ERMIT
v Lines
pp)Jcant F.111 . P �
Peirmi NU*BqA 4
lid I ng',,
JOB AD.DHEM
531 Alder
� "W-
6_ SiDE YAR;O
V
z
Box -334,'.
I _�A_Ar_WtU_ 9B -ER J
% E ?w1dBhA USE
ty�
743-rQ420 No
z
-NAMS'i 7 FtSYPO AAEk-' -1—VAILIANCIC714U)m
V.) T, A R h; K
u
z
R
-itz nthaler
Will'
N'q T-B
NOTE: TO EAVE LI14ES
'7929 236th S.W.-
C. T f:.F
zi*on4r? -R 6-.4,881 'Add 11 constru"ction at ap4rtinent- house -
h- J�P
Gi4ke Constru.ction Co,.-
site.fij.
W-P qTR a
R lr*4 Z,
!qUi2 field Road G YIP5, 0 NO.
"k4V ["j�V 977, CUE lt"CIC CHECKED BY
Sggtt16. 77. LI 2�45,1.-,l
[ .. _. — . ' .- . . , .1
r�& 4qr,�Sm NURBfx Fufff NSE
223, Ql Opi4e0o
'WT - B C
Lo X
Al t*
7—
Lots,-. 25 �7, 28, .32
'TYFX VERLIIE!�>� BY'
Pl4t the Cit
.9f y pf d#iqnd.8
7:
N
.�RRX'ZONE TYPE. OV! COXST`RvCT.10Nv. STRII T IMPROVE
a -OR REAVIREp- J,OC.CUFANCY PROP
E]
ZD TE_
rTOTAL FS
7 T w
o retaining ��Llls
TEN
NMI _-0v _PT 10.00
U. N zw,
�IrA AS LI24
R?"11?ENT1J
EZ
A
PT
DWEIZiN
DEL!OLITIOX
WA4R NON-RESIDENTIAL NTTIS I
'P RMIT
FEE
PRO OfMD Ukl�
OUNT DUE
i,bar'�by "o.IdFe.th&t. I haw read th.'s application: tb-t III's In.
ATTEN710 APPLICATION. APPROVAk
.f tion Zj�,Is c9rrr.t: &M that I tke owuSr. or tl�e duly authoIr-
iz agent a� t" qwm�r., 1 &��" tq compply vnth c-Ity aj�q fft&Lq I!Lwh,79u- TR�11 rpi-MIT
�el . . ` Thi a plicatio 4
�f cpastmiction: -ad to doing t.4* ?c author%7��d themby, no ;mrppm AUTt,,O I -A; -p not a pormit'until
Qz - ___ _ . I F47-Z'S I -
`Wkil t;� employed in violattoft O� the fO�de 0if tAs §W8 -Uf WalillRqt�qq Signed �y t4e Director of Butlding,�rkspecm
Ovr.y- Tilm
tv
woklic, _W
tiOn, qr ki�ks deguty; and 4ees ar ild, and
r.ek�q�q t?.Work.m.en's Compe-sktioq lnzu�ft.
n-spacg prov.
re�eip� I ackno edged I -ided.'
N TE: PERMIT- LIM-IT QN.E YEAR
EC. T, 0 11
p;sp
'T
W. I . �j -1 : �L
IPI ioAlArVlm_�. , §;q1'11;X0 �, � ` . I I i . DIKECUVRIW@�1L �114
T
31 C.IT Y 0 F
T.
"lli ED "MONDS
r*LoT CHECK APPROV
PT
JI
.91 1
-114 -AJ
M
M4
—10
�zz RECORD OFANSPE
CTIO
4.'
NS
k V
Date F,,sse,d',',.
Foundation
"W" Pluh�bin
ol�
[Roug�),-,:
9
md
Fprn�ce & FU 6 A
F
id.al
41
F ORP"QF !NSRECTIONSR'
'��'Datd� Passed""
Foun t.0
0a I
z;. -rl 4.7 .f It
Pl�m Yl
(pa
Mnglparflal
NW
F rame" .:I�
Finq!
z 7-
4
r
ATION AppI-:Nq-:-
-APM POILDING::i, PE , RMIT
it I'
yw.;
1B jtok�4:.D# artm
Mb (Me
4;!TYIVF EP
k,,'LUI 4;�;Op4nC'e :with -the accom,
4OUCAliON - is Woy - m4e f r a. - pItmr�it to cpnstruct the fotlowIng W4?rr
p rp.v
i9m. T o sets ;v;;: pb!�l
n §pm, f, itte her, th �qr 4 p
P4. YMK p "3m �Ad
n
ter
g
P.,
WX* prk addh rII;ptr ....... .
Off -St..
Fire
Use 7!.
7one.
Q Y,....
.7
.... ......... ............ ..........
Lot..
. ... ...........
BIL. Addn
fic ta k.
..............
.1 §ide.
ear ........
r
-orit ....... �,
B!W . , "'o. -
.g, setob�cks fx ......... Si e
4
Add�em' i,
N" ?
Own
N, ,4,k--,',
XP
�A dress.
To'
........... ... ........
Butid ep,,..
.......... ..........
ks. ... ...... ...
able Codes and- Stat-c' laws rep4t#�9.tlw
r s e7
94 tat d I qgV��,tt? CpmPlyw-h III
ve �is �.Cor it ap,p ic
vi6rk.
r
'ess ate
Own
Sigr -,I ........
m e th ih
A h Y- ed �thc- above cqn,.4itip'ns,, anO �q qo p, anc wi e
P&MIff- jor the. above is �Ijbj�:qL tq._
. ti,�n 'pd. B �Idj tici h
_pg pe-putmept nota n3
�qy,,�d p, Anp. an j,
4-
Permit ree
v uation,
Date
5uMink ......... .. ....
I ...... .........
7
-1, 0
INSPEC, I
E
n
It,
Frkmg; 01�
er, DIU S
ocs -rlctt cov
257.
7=1
NUMBER
PERMIT
plimrit FW: .650246'
Ul XMIV
' fig; eml PO 6f
Idi "AP "' �D`A`
Heayy 1.1mes
v" XAXX I NA_�I� 0 HU S�) 4qB. A ppkmse
A,'
V.
4" YX"''
r
'8ET M FLEAR
sIj?4 YARD
_NGADDRErS,
TELEPHONr USE ZONE,
YES
VAIqANC9 X
A U*B
q
&LL BUILDING SETB�.CXS
MAVE LINE4
qT
Q
Q (�.v E U 7�77
_11LMI
A�,
T,I�Ulp-ER STREET OR"PE (:HyCK I j
Raq,�t d
M. YES?
ER", M11TER SIZE' a
,N
ER Ne N..
q
-BLOCK, TxAcT
j,
.01 T
TYPE Cqr4v�;qT;ON, ERI?iED �_B T
v
ol�
F,,EnmLT NMEER
FIR* 40i
INSTItUCTWON PTRE-FT1 1UP-ROVED
YES
11P
4 FC —1,k CY. GRO.LT.
NO
YES
P �C
y
"'TO 13S DO?�
-TOTAL FIF
z
BUILDING
VALUATIO.1;
lfe;�4.1�.-2!5
2
A
z 3 PE EE
_RMIT F
Q
BY -AT & r
j !As PM�
mu)�qr,rt Or PER,
L -z
RE
)4�T rEM
X77.."T,
p4rApt 1' .0 p.
_ii�diT FEE
_*�MOUNT DUE
"_"g. t4at "v� rpm�d tNfi that ti�l in-.
0 L - . APPLICATION APPROVAL
ATTENTI
or the du,1y
formation gt"
Iii correct: and that I Lin the OWDTr-
ith city aP4 'tnte ley'd re1ii7 THIS PER39T This application is no a'pe7nIt un I
tje� agent Of k�p o-�rnpr. I !�" to comPlY.w
ponstructim. and In dqLng t4p *1!1�0!71ZO t"W, ELO PerW AUTHORIZES
qtXroq �y th Director qf,BU.U41nt 1419peq-,
tion of the Le. r. Code or t� St&te Of W"hinc-on my THE
)oy_vd !n viola _j?d, fees and
WORK NOTED or his deputy; a re
vr-r—aw a pat
elpt Is -acknowledged in spAcgi provitled.
rec
E PERMIT. LIMIT ONE: YEAR
I?EqTION
NOT,---
PIR�.,PI�PVVS S191 E
DEPARTMENT
CITY,0F
R�
i CW
PLOT,
/Z11
q.1
CITY OFi: EDMONDS
j C6.N'STRUCTION\ PERMIT �-APPLICATFON
ELLIil I,,y.UI,H
'711
e�CWlb IND!,
F'.1
SE
D9f Numaw 956491.
D . 0 t.ss_
ssis, Al, 1-e
C.EC
YOLIC RiG�t 01 WAY PER (>P$16AL STREET MAR'
XISTMG.::-t�. flEOWRIDDEWCAT,10"
VOPOSID'�__,
sr�l Or W-lc6wpuctm" PERMIT REQUIRED
IPEET USE PERMIT REOUIRED77
EE, ENGI 0 WEEPING MEMO DAiEo
'O.W Di.y
CF REVerW Ee�
c LIST WED.
7 -IR' SO Z F I t_;
r
IFIXTUkE
a
ED .010SE3 r
d
66:-
7
VIAIA11-6t oa cu 4 %4 By
L
Ell
, It
7'A I c- r (QA,�4
e2z-4 4;,e)?f Ke
C-ECI,ED U� -T�PE Of c,),ST TIDN
c.
SPE.11L ..III-T.- 01
file"
UCCU�Atn
LOAD
REOUIPED I
.7 YdS_
s I o
&/xz
T.
. : . : . . .. V.
-L- -[E
3�
8UILD,IG P.
ei&
PL.kj.E.! S�
VEC-Al.C.L
7--
GAAC-.-:;Y-IL
secaj,�w�e—.ssion.
It
�:arw W'. n i6o 0ays
q-
s:,o�se. r�e-,Vass,gns ano
h, ce!e�c and
C,a-" !01*IjaMaqeS Of
".Asn-glol. -�:s
a- 5 fne iss�tance 7
z e- t sma.: i! 'a Ceerle,:l 10
en,c::q
1.0TIL1�4-mouN.t OJE
r;s
a,: W I a,� a*-",. cf *tr-.e jOy APPROYAL "a,
f r1l E APPLICATION
a;'e� a;, -1 c,!y a .:t
o' i.Tp� t no 11,40 unill
5: a, 5 !e 17te �o:� Ilication 4,11oll a"
(IT
-e fz�'_vl� LaDc, by the-BuilbIng Otltc,af'o,.A,5
-e e-A, c.- '�eo6iy: ano f08S afts Palopano fece-ol Ts
acknowte(jged In SpaCa pro,ided,
ofI, --s 5-r,%A�uac
EDMIO!'I; G
c
AU.
5, L:0-G CP S'RvCluAE
,tt.. E A%D APPROVAL OR
ONPN�L"i- FOG,- YELLOW.- 11`13PITCJ�J`.'
sq,
c O'ANr,, m- RANTED
06
PINA -0--o, 'GOLD' A3j8#obw**.
it
Mm,
L
e,
(,,#PLANNING DATA
-c�.Commercial I Multi -Family Projects
STREE �FILE
Name�
Date: Lo
Site Address: A-
Plan Check#: BLD-zooe-01-15W C1
Project Description C,14
Use(s) Proposed: rALi . �Lq C (_
2AIlowed Use: I NO)
0
CUP File Number: /V,711�
To Allow What Uses:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: 0-9—N-O—) UJ
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES
Zoning:
Map Page: 0
Comp Plan Designation:
Corner Lot: (YES I
Flag LoL (YES 1'6
ADO File Number (date waived): (rl
LoLArea. Z_ 6 E- -7 7 4) 7 u/1 S, s:- 4 Ak
Plans Match ADB Approved: V�l V
Shoreline Required: (YES
Critical Areas Determination
/T/�I_ iiI.OrL �,o ekis
El Study Required 6
�rac,(,d zvis-�,/r C-ffce-
M_WaiverC(e4zCdq00 0-wovid"-W
SEPA Determination:
brExempt
El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake
Ballinger. Requires: _Q) fee, 2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized LorrPI-P
ROqiiired Setbacks
Street-, Side.
5 t -0— (y)
Side:
CV
R�r -ov,
_f)� J i
ji�As,2 . -, I I . .�D:
A.e �Setb, C..
22'
Street: AmAl e to Sid Rear
,� O� ,
'] re
Lot Coverage/AAWR�4ui,>;Ci., "W� At Lot Coverage,!�W�rovided:
_*N_
Lot Coverageotil—caicuiations:
� --. rA)
Kt-f—c"IJI C, He�yht
Datum Point:
Datum Elevation:
Maximum Height: o,"04-1�r V-11'ctual
Height: A- lqo. z.5-
Lot Aggregation Required:
I ng
Landscaping Matches ADB Approved: 0 C h,::r-'A
Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO)
ond Amount (100% Bid):
S-6) IA. t116 tl//O_�
Plan Review By.- (_Oq5-�)
&U, ld(
;q)
0 0-
PLANNING DATA
New Commercial I Multi -Family Projects
[STREET
commerciit,)
Business Name Type/Use Parking Tenant Required
Ratio Area PaLrking
Total Parking Requ'
Total Parking Prowded
Multi-Fainity
# Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit
Parking Ratio
# Units
Required
Parking
Studio
1-210.U-
f
1 Bedroom
1-5/D.U.
I-
A
2 Bedrooms
1-8/0.U.
C/ V
3 + Bedrooms
2.01O.U.
rotal Parking Required
To tat Parking Pro vided_-
He -1 CO,/c _S C-Q/cj- —;50
7
A A-- IoS-
6 -103 - "
C- qI .7s, /3 /0�
!r- / 21f 15- q Iq (o -s,
qO 7:_ /q_T:7� C 10 -7
7S Aq
V- / 31 � t q3.,2
Plan Review By:
Site Information (soils/
1 . Site Address/ Location:
CA File No:04- -zi
Critical Areas Checklist
phy/ hydrology/ vegetation)
2. Property Tax Account Number: 001P 001 r-)0'7
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4&, �jtlo
4.. Is this site cuffently.developed? X� yes; — no.
If yes; how is site developed? tf
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a I 'horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes. present on site of morer? Wqn" w
?"�;q -fiwt
over a horizontal distance of 33
Get
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on Ft
.,Akvertica1jrise# 10-feet over a horizontal
-distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: M 0 Approx. Depth:'
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: M 0 Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year? M
8. Site is in the floodway 0 floodplain /Q 0" of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek,or. an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
.10. Site is primarily: 'forested meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) X'
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
For City Staff Use Only
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? —Ll�z —S/ (
2. Site is Zoned? Cc m
3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? I Va e 5
4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? I\JOI\R-
5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? /VO
STUDY
Reviewed
DETERMINATION.
Qy
WAIVER
Critical Areas Checklist.doc/4.22.2003
OV & 6 City ofEdmonds
0
Development Services Department
Phone: 425.771.0220
Planning Division
%91� Fax: . 425.77.1.0221,
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
-The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The information
needed to complete the Checklist should be easily,
available from observations of the site or data available at
.MURREWBUMN&PPEW
APPLICAMN PIC
Date RecelVtd: !�Z ev Z
City Receipt#: 6—
Critical Areas File#: c,2Qfq—0090
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $13 .00
Date Mailed to Applicant:
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed cop y
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the - applicant shall include other pertinent
information (e.g. site plan., topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
The undersigned applicant, and histher/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City ofEdmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable
attorney's fees, arising from any action. or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLIcANT/AGENT adiLz) 4a'-31 41,"Ll DATE
Property Owner's Authorization
By my signature, I cer* that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF
Owner/Applicant:
Z)
Name
6"T,
Street Address
aAA a�i D6 uJA 119to 0
City State zip
Telephone -
Email address (optional):
DATE 6 0!�� .
Applicant Representative:
iAL�L4141--c-_�- 64
Name
Street Address
P�&A Oki
City State zip
Telephone: (AIA -5 ) qf7e -R�()6
Email Address (optional):
Critical Areas Checklist.doc/4.22.2003
00
CD
V)
CITY of E D M S *E'� S I.V.E R E R M I T'
D S
For Inspection Call 771-3202 PERMTT NO 0.8 14 7
F(IEET F LE
ST
Address of Construction:
Property Legal Description (Include a 11 ea s emen ts IkV-5 25- 2 2
Owner and/or Builder:
Contractor & License No:_.,ke�611'e ;_zolz
Single Family Residence EDMONDS
[ITREATMENTr!PLANT
Mul ti-Family (No. of Units
Commercial (No. of fixture Units
Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way
Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any
excavation.)
Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required,
attach legal description and coi,� �tyeasement number.) fiLEGEIVED
1990
PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK
PUBLIC WORKS
I// r if that I hav read and shall comply Date
1,P
051th the items listed on the back.
Permit Fee: Issued By:
Trunk Charge: �Date Issued:
M,
Assessment Fee: Receipt No.:
Partial Inspection:
Comments Date Initial
Final Inspection Approved,: fo
Date Q�n i t i a 1
Rejected: Reason _Ua-te Initial
** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE **
White Copy - File Green Copy --Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant
The City of Edmonds
APPLICATION
for
SEDE SE147A FERIVHT
OUTSIDE E] INSIDE E] REPAIRS
CARD No.
EASEMENT No.
OWNER ............. A.N-Q�� ............. N. ..................... CONTRACTOR .................... ....... )-)
- -------- .... ............................ PERMIT
STREET
HOUSE No . ...... . ��.o ...... . ................. AVENUE LIDT No. -2
........ ....... ... ---- ........ BLOCK No . ............
----- T ---------- ..... .......................
5 -,65 NAME ADD - ------------- 3 . I . I - 13�2 ............ c ......... IaS� ............ ..............
... .. . ......... ----------- ......................
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ...........
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ..................
.1 / 4-1� - - , - 01
APPROVED
AUG 14 1964
Date Approved:
4-
........................ DEPOSIT, $ ............................................. 41;
........................ DATE I .. ... .... ... ...... .............. By ..... . . ..................
Side Sewer Drawing
"The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO - --------------------------------------
NEW CONSTRUCTION Ej REPAIRS E�/ LID NO - ---------------- .- -ASMT. NO - ------------------
OWNER----------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT NO. D-RJ-(�77
4(-,OEQ- s —k.
JOB ADDRESS � LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - ----------- -------------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------
------ ----------------------------- I ---------------------------------------- AQIE-
E
PWW-0001-11/75 (REV. 11/78)
U)
NAME OF ADDITION ----------------
L I tz
I —�Vx-lf
Aunt,
=EDIMONDS
PLANT
T
TREA�'fMtL
Approved:
"I z
-q6
DATE.......... ........................... By ...........................
Page I of I
RE9"'A"1VED,,..,-.
JUL 27 2009
Robert Winters
From: "Robert Winters" <rhwinters@qwestoffice.net>
To: <finnegan@chartercon.com>
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 9:20 AM
Subject: Mariner Condominiums
Finnegan -
Per your request, on 7/15/09, we measured the highest ridge of the new roof system for Mariner Condominiums,
555 Alder St., Edmonds, WA.
We measured the ridge height relative to the Datum Point ( Elev.= 100.00) displayed on Plan Sheet A 1.1. Our
measured difference in elevation between said Datum Point and the ridge is 43.15 ft. ( 43'-2'), which is V-1 " lower
than the maximum height allowed per Plan Sheet A 1.1.
Best Regards,
Robert H. Wnters,PLS
Chadwick & Winters Land Surveying
1422 NW 85th St., Seattle, WA 98117
206-297-0996
H
N
"i 4
4 0 oRg-M&O
z 0
Ar. I /C.
5
EXPIRES SM 10 A
1-7101
7/17/2009
(W'Y OF EDMONDS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
121 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206)771-0220
DETERMINATION OF LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 555 Alder Street — Mariner Condominiums (Buildiap B)
TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NUMBER. 0063990OF200900 (Unit 9)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CONDOMINIUM PLAT OF THE MARINER BLK 002 0-00 — APT 9 IN BLDG B
It is hereby determined that pursuant to Chapter 17.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code the property
identified above contains a nonconforming (check only one of the following):
USE BUILDING LOT SIGN
Description of legal nonconforming budding (describe In detail): As
vart of the City's review of the
pre -application for an
exterior remodel at The Mariner condominiums at 533/555 Alder Street,
it was noticed that them
an extra unit
in the
.jasciucat of Buildiag B that was not approved duounh a building permiL
When rcyi wed aeainst the current
RM-1.5
code, this
extm unit was found to be in excess of what the zonijm allows. The,
parml is approxiaptely 26,571
square feet
and each
dwellin2 unit reauires 1.500 sauare feet of lot area resultinit in 17.7 possible
dwelling units for the parcel
(17 units
practically
since the City rounds down).
In lookiniz at the history of the parcel, the Mariner Apartments were leggly constructed as two buildings in 1964 under budding
pqrmit number BLD-1964-0220. Building A (533 Alder) contained eight units and Building B (555 Alder), nine. The parcel
was zoned R-6A at construction which allowed the construction of multiple Law ly dwellings. At some ppint after the originA
j
17 units were constructed in 1964 and prior to when The Mariner was incoromted as a condomWum in 1974, the additional
unit was added to the basement of Building B without a building permit.
The City was unaware of the additional dwelling unit until the pre -application for remodel was received in 2008 prior to
auglication for buildintz permits to complete the remodel work (BLD-2008-0456 and -0457). Due to the length of the use and
the inability to establish when and how it was created, the unit is considered to be a Iggal non -conforming unit. It will be
allowed to continue subiect to the Homeowner's Association hiring a mgistercd architect to Perform a life -safety inspection to
2006 IBC dwellinp urfit codes and submittal of a report to the Buildinp Official for ieview. If the repoirt calls out building code
life -safety issues, the HorneQwner's Association will be mquired to obtain a ponit to correct the deficiencies -
This determination was made based an the following Information and documentation: The onginal building pennit for the
structures was reviewed (BLD-1964-0220) as was the zoning code applicable at that time. The Condominium Plan for The.
Mariner from 1974 was also reviewed.
Date Annexed: NA Date Constructed:
Zoning at Time of Aenezatl6n: NA _Occupancy Group- NA
No.ofStories: Building B (Three olus basement) o. of Units: 10 units irk Buildine B
This determinationt is made with the understanding that the states of the parcel may be altered by amendments to the
Edmonds Community Development Code (FCDC) adopted subsequent to the Issuance of the determination and
provided that the City shall net be liable for damages for Its action to amend. the. ECDC affecting this determination.
Thb determination Shan be nun and void if any activity, action, or emission as fisted In ECDC Chapter 17.40 occurs
which would terminate the nonconforming status. This includes, but Is not limited to, alteration to the nonconforming
use, building, lot or sign not in accordance with the requirements of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
including required approvals and permit&
I.Ast Attached Documents: Building pgm�t (BLD-1964-40220) for the construction of the Mariner Apartments and the
CmdQmjnium Plan for The Mariner indicatinp the extra unit (B9).
Owner of
Record: Donaldo SWRer-Nakkerud
lmfto -- .
(NAME) (SIGNATUREF (DATE RECEIVED)
M
(SIGNATURE)
NOT AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING
fta soft MICROFILM
I REET FILE
w
,v,
CITY OF EMONDS
4
EDHOUDS, 11ASHINGTON
ppp*?
v E
By Data.S
.CtT
CASE TJO.
APPLICATION FOR VARLAIKE
DATE MAV I 10CA
1*�5.00 Fee
�FF7M TO "CITY. OF EDIUMS COHPRZ HC1iSIVr- Z01411ri PLAN' to h
el�p in
lilling out.your*Applicatloh for Variance. (52e) Pa6-c-s-77-T
9 and 10..
APP--k4ANT: A
PDRZSS
3�g,
9AER A DDREss
Wo,
LOCATION OF r-P.OPMTY Aj-D5V- -�e I U�--)J Auu, QC FRDWfJD�, Aj
St
and NumbcO
LEGAL DEET-RIPTION [;-( ock ? LOT-S. S5, Z 7. Z� 30
.(Lot and 81 ckWu.mbei, 5ubdivision) QpMo . 3 ps.
NOTE: Fil ' I in Items 1, 2, or 3, as appropriatc. Do not fill in m o rc th," one
of these sections. This application is not acceptable unless 411 required
statements have been made. A-dditional information may be supplied on separate
sheets if the'sp
-ace pro.vided. is inadequate.
A rauglp skat ch sh eving 4im nsions ��f land and buildingz� relative to your rc
e quest
mVst.ae�empany. O.is. ;pp�lcation.
0A, 4S, *-P(AcLu.'" 4(,/ -,64,a�
Item L. REOL6ST FOR VARIANCE AS, PROVIDED 3Y ZONIIJU CODE.
—iTc—ision of th�- Duil�i . n
p Inspector. to be reviewed:
7
ct V t.
j
PROVIS;0N of U-ie 'Zoning Code distric.t bpundar question;
y
Item.2i APPLICATION FUR A SPECIAL PROPER-T� UM- As provided by the Zone Code
PpDvisi.q.n o.f th� Zpni.ng Code requiri-ng a 5pe�ial Property Use in this ca�qe-
,VesCription.of proposed use showing_justification fQr a Specip-1 Propert
Use:
y .
Item 3.
a. Facts supporl.ing oimer's coht4ntion that I ancl ar,.(l
or structures in questign
cannot'yield 4 rcasenable retunL if used only for a purpose per'mi't'ted, and
in accordance with other requirements of the (district) zone in i�ich
the lanO and/or structure are located:
_h, ex, -4�js' PVoPeV4,y Q,�
J -4,h3r, +ko wocacu.4,4 jr-,R 4,0 t%k
dc
�e f0l-14-4CK iJel (Q'P I- 11.<?�j ct—d v42r,&—c 4Ao pfoc(14?
oare,
of
Oe not
1 1* f -�,e * I& L:
-i
F-4-0 4,- C005F r�P -e �1-
Q* 11,C(h-V0 �)U t Id Uzi -+(4a, A -30
is locr&4 OJ V op
-f ti wc- hxvev b o f-P 4,, b-Q
t i7, -:54) S'U*
-41
JI
Sal :t
Rv -
Kig, VK
simWOR:
1014DS
CITY OF M W10IJBS, �ffi_
Page 2
Fac
-ts supporting ouner's contention that hi.3 plight is due to unique
circumstances which are not the general condition of the neighborhood, and are
not the result, of the oimer's elm actiOn'
vavl' "A C) or
c. Facts sup uc
,porting. qppell anL1 s and oijncrl s contention that the use r(,.q stedj
if. esta-blished, will net be of a general. clas'sifiration, differing with the
use provisions of the (-district) zone in vjhi ch the land . and/or
essenti
s-tructure are liocated:
STATE. 01- 1JASILINGT01-1
COUNTY
'41 'y f bcfore TRe., the undersigned
91,1 th-i s da 0 ,A.D. 119,-
a No ta ry. Publ i �c'hn an or tbc State: oT7 shin9ton_,4L!ly camis'sioned and suorn,
per - s9nally appeared Ir.ing duly suorn, on his
oath deposes -and s4 i that �q h�is prep.dr(id fthd rcatt the foregoing-statcnents and
h
has a hnqvlcoq�d to. ne that the rf�citations. cont4i.iicd: t cr�*narc ti7�ue, and. has
_L�i3 lnstr� nt zi�- his free and vo1Lu,t;.,ry act and,dcp.d for the. purP0.3es
.the re in, m.nti.oncd.
au �cribed and sijp M- to before nc th i of, -
-19 4 sz
Ily Commission expires ,r_�
710—T—A-F PUBLIC in and f.Qr the
Stat,�\T� I�Ohkin
V�qn, residing
at
Pecord of Findings -of Fact by-�Qoard. of 14justnent
in 41.1 Cases
1. Aff. davits of Publication and' Poster presented, with re ort from Planning
Cem endin� f.avorabl� cons ideration.,
Be it.had Jurisdi,etion; that t�e variance had beep granted
ar4 f�o��nd that
since more than a
Shelly, Case No. 93, but that
re.viousl tq.Mr
-year.. had jDas . sed w.ithout any �ujj.8jng being done, t-he 4pei#:Lpn h. ad �ceased to
he t the building would n of be in co nflice with the development
-be affe ct ive,;
d be -no 6han ihe engineering
pat.p�rn of the neighborbe.o.d; that there w�o4l ge in
and bank I cut as . oresented at the previ ous heariing;
3. Since there were no objections to the gr4nting of -this variance, the Board,
after reviewing the facts. granted the variance as requested...
Dated
Ch4irm n,
Board of. AdjvstWnt
.. ....... ......
0 Zf�
M,
zg
SiltriTOIJ
ZEN1,011D�, !A�
CITY. OF'EDMNDS
Page 3
DATA
Date this a0pli,cation filed:
4 IT
v
Nptice of hearing:� date sc�A:
'Date of h.earing:
Posted (Date):
,.cc re tar-y
an te
tjjc Lain s the
Application or' appcal
i n accordance vi t In of
denied
j,
follow.ing order:
Date
Oi- PQ�JUSTHENT
p
'7
Mr. Andrew Xeshqim.
Box 334
Lynnwood' af-,i;i-if7tuon
r t�',
cqnf —41:1 for the record tha� the
)-,t�:ont, at their repul.ar meeting
or
va r ia front setback and heiFbt rettrjc-
t 0 r�!rtinin r)rop4rt%r locat,ed on Alder
-illow construcVion
vf�rucs to
.<,et the rronertv
'on
v r c t i oad
you-'-, r "r t 1
1! -,,1 TCk -I-)
.1
Socretarv, Roard of AdAustment
;l
-jo
:qi
r�6
41
C77
0
v W
.5ATE 1_,31�)**'*4,5...'..'�'�'
CITY OF -EDMON6S
'FEE. _z_9V;, 7,
-HEARING:* EXAMINER
RECT,
R
PPLICAT.ibq'� F6 VARIANCE.
APO'S
HEARING' DATE,-.,
APPLICANT".'G I id y s AT)DRESS 5
& D 6'� n E ch e I b r q e r A- Yd.e r S P e�; t h"&:u s e,.
�WA
'IT 'E*' - 'v
4"
C .'ZIP d o'� PHONF 7 7 8 - iO'7 5. /7 7 7,,0 2 0
Y & M 98020
IND ICAT^ 'T'�Pt"16k.1DE�REE,.
E-' OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY own
J
.�LO,CAT.ION.,�,OR.:ADDRESS,;.OF:- PROPERTY Penth'Quse M6rin6r C o n d 6r� i n i u'm,
OF.,PROPERTY see attached
L GAL"DESCRIPTION
ir-4
IRZ
.�-�'-�t.".","�...��,�.,.VARIAtICE'!'REQUFSTED:,, ''Constr6dt i6n' i6 an -over h e i q h t a r e A i) b 1. i *c'a t i
a
,-.,,be�fi.approved-_by_ ADB
�6
CZ-,USE�'ONLY; USE ZONE:
�FORQTFI.
A
U." -
-ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT:
ZONING
V
-A P
please/Hold Harmless ,reement.
q
;.",.The un ersigned ap'plicant,.his heirs and assigns, in consideration for.
-,.*-'-'the:.�Ci'ty.,p3:ocessing the a elea.se- indemnify,. def end -.and-,'
agrees co,r
61'd,* the! City of -Edmonds harmless from anv and all
_h damages.ai�d46r..�claits 'f or
damaged,- incl.ding.r6asonAble att es, arising
ornevs ` �e from at�y'action
-in
or inaction.�is based in whole or T)art upon false, misleading.or incomplete
e
nished'by,..�he�applicant, his agents or employees.,
informati.on fur
Permission to Enter Subject Property
'The,),�ndersigned applicant.grants his, her or its pe�mission for oublic-.
of 'the of Edmonds to enter, the subject pr-crverty
�offftcials and the staff
.,for the,purpbse of inspection and-postin to this -application.
a�tendant
11. "0
*,ignaturel ot ApDlic�k�- owner or
Representa�ive
d
�'d
, a 'i
DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT
ns
Plea�e answer 'all questio
c'�a'riac teri� t ic s, (i.e. t pogriphy.,,' s ape
0
What ..,are the physical. In
dship
of -lot �' etc'.),' hi:ch- create A- har for you in regard to..
development', of your�propertv?...
. Bui , ]din , i ..i 8ve r existing h e i g h t I imits which i s th*e'0n,l.Y"., i's . sue
diff
How -does- yb*ur-.property. er from other;property e. sa e,
.,,...,.:VIC Inity7- -
Y
hi
Cons,iderably
1 9 he r.
to
::-I. J. 'Wi;1.1'- this - va-A,-:,i an c e b e to the public or damaging,
_,d6tr4mental
-imp . r vicinit-1,
ovenent s in, the
5th6ir,':property., or y
N e d ad
-A I I fr�q6esi di'tions face the west a n d. any view
consu-med b Y' �xistinq structure.-
c o r r i r*
cq(
W� a, t:, hardshipis'.`:' il I- result* to You if the- variance. i s'. not',granted.
.4. W
y your own n.
e I
Will' th'se�,hardships have been caused b act'io
t h a t immediately gran e
�Ie, a'r e a's k i n g for nothing would not b e
e would.
I f o u r b u i I i �q' wasn t 40 high. The hardship is that we woyl.c.
ODert a
not have f u I I.yse of our Pr nd it wa5_,not caused actions.
5. Can 'you m'ake',re'asonable use of your property without the variance?
vabjility
Q No. Al I -homes need modernization to maintain their- I i
and value.
�J
tY
4
7 7;
z
ka �A-
- �sl
rk
nzz D.
4 i2 A f
MA P
11CIN TV'
Y,
V 1 8 5'
I z 13 4 S 6
31
241
0
71 77..
t
4 S:' 3 4 5
39
5 1 30 ;2,9 -7A 2 3
—2E
30 60
z 3 4 S'
:L4
28 6 2 24
cr.
j6 . .....
6 7
y
11 12 13 i4 15 3 4 5 6,
2 3s
.0 ..n LAU!jm
— 0*06664
77,,- 77777�f---' - - -
To -mw
I H �4:0;5
A C04 W.INIUM
19 14 's
635
D."Ild IT
—N-0- 7*
7 3 4 1-7 ' 'At
6 7 R Q I
1 15 16 17 1 V
H 0 R T H
363 U 33 31 'n 25 S122 21
6 -7 36 3; 34
.0 30
10 3. 4 5 (Go
14 13
1 16
ro`�-'GH'ico ... P U40v4cD �ay
KR.Qk--� MAP CiDMPAN.Y, SEAT-9,1LE
SCALE: I IN.=700 FT--
-.89
Fe 4",
Ty,
WWI,
At
fif L
11 -1 A
S.
v fe
l� �2.'
I
lYrl H11 11 1
D'L-IAN ECHELSARGER FtESIPENCE
A H 1.0 1 T 5
'41
ld
-;OAS,
P? AF.�; v
7 t
Do or, C5
Li Ll
to*
[it
qF
6W 14K
yb
ol 07-
0
Ab
oc ,
k !eZ
- r-11
4L—
IJ
41. 1
OF
It
IM
bY
R-o
Vi�
1,0
`b, 0-0,
Vn -�,P 0 a
I'. lo,
0A
VIA v
2 C
I io z
T �1-
7 T,
-77
�v
r
!'R
0
�, �tl
47
?
Olt
A
77777-7----�--,
17
P:! :V:1p
tP.
40
ow e ;
q k, qft',
id
It
I
OW.
KI
w
Jund 21,' 1985:
4
kiz -Jarres M D iscoll
r
dr
Hec in ier
'in
FROM:, DuaneW. BoWnk
Planner
SUP= RDQUE=-.INMRAATION�,ECHELBA.RGER,.VARIANCE V-14-785.
q
0 gard
ou req iriq tl�e buildin4 he�ig. t jLn e ect." at
Y rde'st4d inf r.r.na*ti6ii :re h' if
t1i th�:� 'the -Mdrindt c6hdc'miniizn'- wa's built.
e tnpe
V"
:''�_! - , u
The. Mqriner:,.Vas-- built in"1964, under B ilding permit 1.64022O.-i.,ji
zoning,on.-the pro�ei�ty-at that tin�-_ wa.� R�-6A. Th6 niaxiimm, buildifig..
Ime .
'height�*,,i�!'.that,'�one,'district was 30t.
The, p rope rty", 6w'ne'r,�,49t.;. ilti.
a 'lie8,`_'fc;r "and" 'ieceived;a variance',,to-dhcreas to - -
pp e jLng
-r �arian
#V--�139.
0� ce'
pride
'A -ta
ch a.p6py of thp Building. Permi #640220 -:�f6r� infor Mti6ri'.�.-*
Qd is your
5.
4"
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A
�s
�J
Hw
10 LA
T WA
f'I.I:L r-J A i
wmmm
T—Eww"'W
i4"Ocl C"
L/
L
hwi-IJ
_j_
IftINDIXt Of,
that I mm A�PpLvrq"; lbqkt tf.W
Authar-
ajm..K, -C
egwtrw": a- t. "u-1w th�"� P�m
wtn 1. mfwrw I.t "*tv� ftf vb. Lat�_ VF-_MUw
PERMrT UMff ONE YEAR
I W
NITIM-FIF
.4
44.
nmzr
—,,V' AIITT
Muww/
. . . . . . . . . .
rh
n- T r.- i r] mo 1 -
nt" or-tvum CMAZL&M.
L
din:
NO
OP
A rl O.?f
rnurr rr.�
T 13AA LANZ
-xyt*rr
L A 11
rmm rT 1, Lx
A MOV�m Four.
Tiqm FIPLWT
Th"
AVrWPVnUM
.
I_XISPIF�i 113-
ID
n it r A I�MXMT
.77
T*
0�-, "wm", muwft"
" ffimm4
=R
?
4
, O-W,
71
t I& DJ
ATE,
V-�z
i Wt
ig
1 7
'WIT,
BY
Pli
(VERBALORDERS DO
OPS FORA/,.,1 232 7;�
DATE
WIM"V �
-FIROM,-Dl�ane. sowmani,-o-
r 4,; 1 �rrj
1�9 C "L�
f4
ZC V
;A
�,,-��I�uCTION -IN' 'AN:0�7F�R H
A-41
co .3
RTANCE
-B J -'�CONDOMINIUM
AT M"� R 1 11 E
D!\ 20, .1985
HEARTNG JU141,
EN, T S N 0. LATER;,. TAANj-,"�,
YOUR CO,
RESPOND WITH
..PLEASV*-.t.
�19 8 5.
THANK YOU
W.,
WIT! I-
x
41
T'
—�7— 77
Lr
It,
.7;- -7 - -�
WC
W.0
520 1-14 P/1 e 62ow
lov
C
Ale
74 -19- o V,`
;t� 7.
'o
'OR.
Jo,
'der
t.. q 4!5�
�7
�x 1. ''.7, 'Of
154 a 16
��eb
.... ... ...
--7�7 -777-77
4 CIF
41A
v
P6,
1. 4 z
ties mmpWm -
In"
w
poem
LAW
Sta tory WV"wty Deed.
a GRAXTM waamm A. ;009�ww A qOW", *sbo%d "d wife, 4/b/a
ow jpd la amik-dom of uo:os and otl�- .10SAUe
b b�d pw cew 1$ 00 "m OM C. MCQF&W vtCL9? MCMAIM. bacbmad and vito
blll�. omv~ vv�j evats. 10* cow-W7 4; &"boft"4
-1111PIM
An ram ATabompk
falu. -UP
AR
iF V
4
I f5
Y
OA
�4,
24th day 0(
STATE WAWNCT071,
W-1h ov.-*rvd Www RICPMR A . a NAN(WJW? C. JOPOOM
to U "0 ho@"b@;
they their, k." "di
, gre
oweis
Lqp
0 '10
0411, 11
jik
%
1W
Vlgf,
�:q
ol,
YO
R1
4
0
EXHIBIT A
W, PI PT I W OP PROPERTY,
%
follcrding 'AP11tmnt(,) of
M. intandod
tho nomod condominiu
only�ftr tho Otatod uce, accord�ng to Ourvoy 1-.Up and get of Plaij
13,
recor",,aa no (Gaid Survo
Y, I�OP Ootting forth and dolinoating
a dqOcription of tha J'nA 00 provided in'V� 62.32.
0 A-
O�D*(I)), and
4�cord.i ng *. to Cond=jnjum Declaration r co'dod as notody
V;TH . 0 r, TCGETKEn
statod'porcontago of undividod
intoraot in tho cavawn
.4"G. AP4 FOcilitioc a - ppartalnin.9-tO.04id A.parts;tqnt(a),. AND . ... ..
TOGZT= WITH tho uao of
th000 Limi 4 C P
to om2on Araas-qno Facilities,
if 'any, appertain ng. tq Paid Apartmont (o) not'
Including Out
noco a za I i
F y 1"tod to, - the Oxcluciva U00 Of Opo-qific
Co==n. Area "a gonoral locationa �O
"M, (ICA) atatod balow; if any,
ch are'oLwn-i he �A
A't- Surviny gap qnd Platte, but the oxact diman-
aiima of'which mny*not be dofinod:
co,
n4omini4q. The Richmar v P
singlo rilrxily Rpsidential
0 UE3O
v v i
PP46 (a) 4i Plato
through �Q
nocording No.. 840411�001
§n9homi6ii'CO.U.nty
21 '0
F-*corAod: April.13, 1994
cording np,
.8�04001'0'
ty—
cqrda of naid Coun
arcentzgq (is)
p 4-1641�
LCA 103
Parking Spaca(a):
1�61 Storage Rxx* (s
j,O 3
%
Situate in the CO.untl. of 'S (phomitah, State of Wanhingt9n.
'9
0
8
1:P
oil d
*01
oo,
%
ej
V 4
A
0
0
'b
'477 —
'Ng- p
Z.;
EXHIBIT. 1
.,S.TAFF: MPURT TO THE -'HEARINAG, EX_VTNER
g4.
F L V�
14-85'
JUIE 20, 19 8'5.
�HEARING.DATE: 4
'Aw
-,-.,REQUESTEb�,:,ACTIW:
-additions.: to. -exce6d1i7ig'
ce,
arlar to,. a 1 low.. 0.6nthouse,
':-the-permi-E dd" . lEi i.g -�Iimit* ot 3 at S
h �ht. 0 5 55: 'A. e.�7 t
Edi�
APPLICA;`N" OWT ER:'
T I
Dean EA'�l�.arqer,
-der,
E s- WA-�:*-`9,8020,.,
mon
tRIPTION
S
Lt �3A:L -D E
'(S e e E'xh ib i t 2)
`W, :ZW V-50.'V�
STAF-F.) F.'INDINGS, AND. CONCtUSIONS:
-the �'Sublect- Prope ty,.and,,;Sur oun an
A. -':D'c*scription o'f
_;-App i,c a
The, 1 nt:,,,i's 11
eeking to,. r *ake. additions - onto'-��t 'e
'pe -ouse of the--M "Condominiu ':at.:'1.-5 -1,d6
nth ariner M
5 5,-,� A
S t, r e d t,,., The -.ovemen i ric lii� e.: r�Q'v'l* h, h�
t s ng.,t-.p,,sout west
impr
x-, corner
the ise,.�,�it P-67 tp ;the, Twes t 'and
to" the south.'.-, 'Aj.pb,,' on. the' wt:! of th
t, d* e
'x� 3
pentho�is :,add' 4 12 enliQu$e.
The Mariner, Condomi-nium. ip comp.vised-�of two-building.p
-18 units. Tbe,:PIE�,nthous -s'tion, i s
cont4inin�.'
e, in,, quc
-1p. at* d at6p. th e,:�.n, bu The buildings,
ij in
1?u
were ilt in. 19 to a h,eight of 401.
'�,'6unding ..deveippment is a mixture -of multiple f amil
and sin�le,'family residential.
T:
_Tlx
qgg
"St.
If f� A'dp6�1't'
-1,14, 8 S:f�.
tf
Off ici-'al'..Str'ee* t*'.Map'
P osipd R ;Exi!�tinqxfR
rop
_/W
South' Aldei� S t. .,6
North"%-', --All ey� 15
20'�*-85 01
0 .
-t 6
r�Ahc' .'to Chdptet
C o n r e
;S
Circumstah-
ces'
o'spe'
-N c i'a 1�. C 3:
rcumstanc
1 .:are.,,�-�at�ra6t-'iv6,,but:.mod6'rn-*iza:tlbn is.. -:'no�E
S
f s I, t
groun, s..,. or pec -�l,�qircumq A.nce-
2. .�Special-,,Pri%_le�e
The -structure i s: a 1 r ead y :'a no h o nif 'i n"
b lid ih'g!,', -,�.xc 60. a.
ul ding.7"the.,maximum�..
7!%
-T,o'. g ran
I, im- J_ t.*, 'of 30
r -to'-' be., 4 g r a:ftt,� o f �!'s pec' i a--
�.wdu- 'd, appea,
3. Com&*ehen'
s i PI -a -
h P' -an'; map.- - esi.gnates-..-
T e ampre ens:i,��e'-�_ 61'icy':Pl''
-,bensj
the,s a
as are..
3-acent 'proper. fes'.
a 21 t
-tnc�e'does' not appear--to-
-,The Proposed v
Ari'c
h
with.,t e',Purpos:es o f, the-, Cdffi�re'hensive
copf. lict
P1
..-an
Z on in. g 'Q r d i na-n r. e
h ,'sub j ect. prdperty is zonqd PM -,as a e th'
b
ad ert,
j6.cent prop iQr,*.
ariancedog$ not apppar:tQ conflict with.
The V�q
the'purposes
-a the. FP4 11.5
the �oning, Qpd�' or
N:,Ot Detrimental:,
The propbsed, va
,ri.ance dQe,s not a
e iR j�, to, ppse.
.4ny significant hazard to the ubl-*
w 'or
nearl�y' ?kdjakcent p27qPertiqs
-Min�imum Variance
The request a ppe ar s to r o p,,:r Qs e. n -�mum
t 4 m.1-n.
varianqQ.
� 11 _i�
�, �::t �;.: ,fx�,4
-T4 8 Y
Qf
4
6
Ai 4'
- .. Y_'I
y
MAU
-'S N.-
0
v
Wmf:
-5
.Thei,,Firopose :,'additi:6ns-� re:��i tActive �and�K�im
ov s t.
ihig`;"' H " - a'� f 7,,�c al�h
b f f i; b'�i i - I 7ev6r,,
""Supi
b�ecause' h -crizteria�,,.,d Wn,
%
er 0'. cahi�bt
0*., 8 5: C,
Chapt"" 2' L" be rr,e
je
J..
Yl.
14
�%IIZ
4t-
111kND'TN" "-"'AND
PECIST'o
F - 0 THE "litARII�G'*EXAMINFR,-*OF-:�THE'--'�
Sit', -V::
CITYizOF EDMQNDS�
Ffl;E:' V-�.l 4.7 0
1N. THEAIIATTLR�. QF�':THE APPLICATION-,-;,-'-',. ;�X
OF.*, DEAN- ECHELBAIkG.ER'FOR"'*AP'PROVAL��:
QP,'�"A VARIAN Q'E
.-The.:' variance is den''ied'.
PECISION.
INTRODUCTION
'.ge- 6nds' W
D6 a lb � : � 5 5 5.: Alder Street� _Ei:� 9
n� Eche ar. r,
as ini:tb
-ter.. i e
e. tb'.&s-App
I I _� c a nt h1as reque"dedd-4,6
and�.ih e naf'
'tie st j
of.i-avariiance.to'dllcw additions to.. a.'
pentl The.,:re.'q
ornert;-,o
a e,_an,.expansi6n-. of; t�helsout wes�
r�--a ex ten
pQntliouse three* 'fe'dt-',.s'i>�,"i,nche's,".',to.:,�,.,a-L-J-OW:,-,�6
h en nd;:'
t e. kitch the,,.removal. of a;wall
a t:h'e`4expans1on
t e. P,
h".
penthouse..'of a twelVefqot'�.by, thre.e,,,fp,Qt�.s,t*ru'c.t�ion,�,f
3� 3
hous*e. �I'The;.specifi-('�.,,vara.-ance-iou�h�:.-i �-permiesiow, a�excae
.-o
mi -.ed,h6ight:limit-.Of:thirty�*� et;� n, �tht ubj0'ct,,pM-
the pp �6,
pert 0,
y
A-
hea. in,g on the,,...r.equest was,,held. bef6re the..Heari�4',
e ty Q__
,th
Qf�,.�h_.,C�L f Ed�hdson 2, b 19 8 5. -A t, the�.: V�l
h 6a r'J n
!e
fol ng. pre' t6d',testi y'
lowi. sen Lm ev
on and. idehce: 6
Dean F� c' h e 1 b ar'g' e' r''.
Duane B &N�ma n
"S"
Planning- 6`�
part;MQnt�
..555 A-18er,. tree
d
of Fam bh'ds.,,,,,,W
A ��.-198020
�X 980,20
T
Edmond
Wilson". Schwehm
wson,
17aye"Da
.5.55','Alder:�Steet_ -546 Ald r, S t r.
e
e e.t',.
E6monds WA 98020
Edmonds, . WA 98020
At..t -eariD'g�thq'following exhibits were submitted
he h
'adinitted. as part- .'of the offici%al recog-(�:.
x 'b 1 Staff Rppo:�t
h
-2 Appj-iq4t,*�0n'/Dec'l4rat io.ns
3 Vic inity., Map
4 PrQnosed Buildi na F.1 t, Vq t i pn
Photo4rapbs
�5
Suj�spq pt.-to.the-hearing, q thp i;,,oquest, of the' Npari". ka�ihTim
t �g
er, tb.e'Assistant. City P14nne f
r of '.,the Qi.ty Q_ E0Tnpnd_5,- 15q mitted,
Bxhibit'.#6 wh i q h is: -InfQrffation regard.1'ng 'bqildin pe rm i E"
9.
640.220 -(subject.ppoperty)
After, du-e copsideration'.of the testi.morly
by the partie$ during the p�ib�ic heari
EamQri5qs'.Qommun.�ty Devejopment.cqo(�:(EQQQ),
Qf the b. ilding (but. not
P_ �hq pgnt,, ouse) by
and evidence present�e'd
_'the , pi�p
qv�4sions Qf �th6*.
in.. on.
4 n pite sijec . ti
t e Ilea Fx, f
r AP19 4miner- o.,
j -1 41
the
hn.d '.Dec is ion: . o7f,`
er o th
Hear, ng 'd: Cit '.of Edmonds
Y
Re V 1A --:B 5
Klk 1.
Nir,
.2
.Page,
f
0,� Edmonds -..-f ollow'in
thb� o a
_g finding
-s are 6ntbj�ed as. the basis .6 f thb...-H6ari"'
sion
xaminex.,
Decision.
A
FINDINGS OF FACT
The
Appli,cant h as -requested a variance', o"
t a 116
ed�-*at 555 t':J,
-pen ous
tb. & th' e --locat Alder;.'S,f�-e6'
t**!* '". 98020. 'The varianQe
Washing,qn,
-s
from the h6ight,;*limit, tandard-of thirty.%166
..proper y e a ;proper y'.�,
..sub j ect., th ddlt�ions;,t'o '.�h-d' subj
..�that*,�,:th*e,-'Applitant',--�' ek are --a three-a-f o b f 6 6 t
ot... Y_-.six�
-'the,�.'bxisti*'n*�,.'kitchie'n*'-
xt6n�
e. ion we ve,. 6bt �by.�.:
:�e-_�f oo.t., extent i6n*; for a-�grb(:�nhqu.sQ,..,,p oposed,-fb.,*.be.,
thre
.Pj;op 'a h,,'
v6lo'ped.- on'I.,the d6ck:.6f:-,,-Eh b'' t.
a,e e.... su .3.,e c,,,
owm
ny
f
testimo"' Report
St6f,
-property
i s a: pen thou s e'--wh ich,,.; i s- oc "d
The sul:�.* ec t ate �'Iwftl
a o dw..,,as *the. Mar'ine:t7.. o
In i �ilm, ri C" iid6m i iu'M".'-1._�;:
c' rid,om*
n
s*.,pf.. two building-s. In- on
n- uni-s,: -the',",. other bu 1-1 d i'n` g.
ard�':;te LT d,:,, as, eig uni
is. a.,,sw),mming t,pool�separatih.g -�hq two b
The
9
in '.the. .bti il:dih'' �.,�iwith; te6,,,.u`ni.ts..
Apol ican't1s','. pr Qpe r ty., s
:lbcat
'(8chw.e'hm-,�es�tim'6'ny)..-'.,I
The. Mar iner*.'Co'dominIum 9*6 4� ""d Bu_iidkn'ng'�,�
3 n. s-. were. b,uilt'.-in .1.,. ;,.,un ej
Permit,, 64 02..20. A t -f�,const t7i� O.P6
't he tim, r rt
e o ruc. t h e
w bhed'.. that - zon' d natio�n: t Maximum,
as h
-R-.6 A.. Under
bqildiT7fg heig�t was thii;�y feet._�',.::Th` '.�,-appI14
e or..
ig
:and�,Was grapted a,* va�:iance 'to jj_n -ease'th -_bui!dingh ht
qr e
to '.,f o rt y, f6et.. The -building was cons tucte'& a 4E - forty. fe
Ot.,
4. Th 6, s' u' b'' q. t prqper-t p the penthousip t_ - h t- i 1 Q d a t. eid on
a
the 'to
.,P:.,f loog of %the.';Mariner condominium ten,unit t�`ruc�,
s
'it'i ns
ture,.:;The.,-pentho'u,se exqQ-e,ds:th- thir e't w -in�'
0 t, y fe nd, is th�
the ar6a allowed by t., h e under'Buil
a-irg. Permit
§40220 ..(Lxhib
it 6
.5. The subject property zoned RM�1. 5.
6. Section 1.6.30.0 PC estabUshe
�Q_ of th
F�Q s th ximurq
..Q ma
d
height.'. fQr,RM�,I.. 5 struc
t u r-, p s The h ght as Opt bl she
e
in thi!�. sec.tion is t
wenty-fi
feet fo� the subject 0-
perty,. (!�,(;Dc)
7. The A e
ppl-i'
qant.seeks a varianc. to c
id-d-, an add't:i6n to, the�
pc�.nthQusQ whic-h- exceeds t 1i e. thirty f qgt'
hj�iqjht standard.
under the ori'inal constrUctiqn, Thp prQp9sed 6xt'en§ioris
�F n-ings-and:-Decitio
i d
. � E, '' . , .� . .. . .. .. f
.14 e xaminer -of, the'�.City, of Rdfnonds.
aX, ng�..,
A�85
Re' V
a g e
to.-.`.the:,p6n,t-1iouse will . no, excee -the Eorty.v f eet.,., I
'(Bbwtan testi
Of th i2:' b
su, 3ect --prcperty.�-.- mony.)
r� for a� variance �to be granted withi n,,t'
_8 In'.Iotde.
h ei.
n
EdrTidn' s,
t e,.crIteria as,. set forth
0 mu's t be adhered to'�-
The cr teria:,'*iri(
�pb&i:al-ci'rcumstandes.must exist f
S or the,_gral
a variance,
he. --ce must 'not be a' .5pec
ting of a Varian
vile,ge, '�.anted. to, thp
..gr
C. The, request6d,,-varianc . e must not -be in 'coh.f li(
the purpo-ses, of,� the. Compreh�en*si'v'e'-Plan:,oi�f �h(
'nd s
Edffi6
1). The'variance must b. 'n c0nflict`with�.`th�
not e
-.h-6.,-zonJ_ g.code';6f.� the-Cit f 'Edmohds,,61�-:
P y- o
tic.ular,�- z.one.
_E _h.exequested'.varianq riot cr a 's i
e,,Must ate
. e�., . :1, 9T
hazard, to the -public healtl safety r. 'we 1 f A.1
t . . I— I 'I, . -_ _. 0
to. ne-arby, P.,�op�e't
r ies,
F.- "Th" "m"n"
e, Y �L.r 4 Ti,7,- e must be the i.imu-neess
11 1 1 . p � , _c � � ,
!'Appli- ant to enjoythe'
property develop it,::a:s
proper y-.own n e v ci itly.
t e'r s
.The-,-'Pldnnin'g" Dep4r -''of . the -C' of jEdm. 1��
9 tment onds
mined tha-t the requested variance satisfies condi
C'�' E' as"l" sted -in- th T
.,e previous findings. h6-5.e
howe�-,�rer,-.has.determined t.hat'the' request does n . ot
A_— 5. .(Staf*f, Repog.t)
The Applicant has stated tha , t'.th,e rea:s
(?r, the
i,pq.!.ude :the'*mPder'niz'atioii of the penthouse an-d to
4r-p4s.. tb_wintrer flora on site-� The Pla. ning Pepa
d.ete.m. ined " that 'this' was not a 'reason -,o
t jqstify
satisfaction of sp'eci -es ex.sting *fo
al circumstanc i
ing.- of: a variai�cip
Bowman testimon,
Ii ..
The City of.-EdmondS'*Plannin tment (�Qtermine'
g Ddpai7
gr�intjng. of a variance would t)e - A' special pr I ivi - 1 p,
Applicant.. According to.t*-, i
_hp q t;y. the prpperty, wa
wi�h the use
of 4 varian e a t
q nd �ny ex.e'ntion.'
Of t
anc - or an additio,nal vari.4n_qp., wp Id r suit
. r, U , e �n a.
priv.J.I.Q.ge :being granted t& thQ App'��qa
nt, (Bowman
Finidin' g,s',',;and b� f -he.
Vv
-He-ciring. Examiner.- of. -the C`t
I Y_of Edmonds
-age.
Re 'V -4 P 4
1 8 5'
'that with�`. the.' additi -on
-App I i - an t ;s ibmitted-.
12
U I
q
6iild,� be n'o',: in c r e -a' s e,-� i n -the area- or b lk"an6 that th'e,`��
W
U
JVpenthouse''
I . I 'r, �
ext6ntiohs, of`.the'
n6� -b' IM,
e c6nstruc*t,ed'-`
g.
z 1h
ovpr-,�existing. pig Mchelba�r �er t
e i
0001.,
hi�'pent ouse has,'4',000 square.fe-'t` O'i"'th is.;-'A--
13 T*
h
o,
'000-square 'feet arb',used .:j
P iving area,
__squar.e t*, 2 A
is 0,11
square:i --.,dEick;.-,�,�v
and 2*,,0 0 0 e'e t, are,used f or' �thL,
it
2 -000'squ*ar -of :deck that" thd S
t�h eet'
Applicant,.. e e s:
to,'c-xten.d-:the: r enhouse. and" the., o.thprexten�*
i,`6
(E h
q e argqr.--testimohyf
4'C a.n t
desire' _of,�.thd_ to remove'. a�,
IiJwv i t h
all 6iid- to,
,W -
-to the t" A.
construct the' rpenhou s e,- According A�,�licah
g
this �46-u 1 '16' r': ' te -.of the �;a ludlrig;. �Pli" t
d:,al � � t 6' c
._a, viOw w st, ir
qe
upo P O:U
-Sound, h
..n.:,ldavinq. �th elevator: up�to the: e So!'�,.%-�`
.;,Jl�dhelbarger, ,estimbny).,
?
;Tbe,:,Appl� cant si-ibmitted'-that. because of 't h e' e x &e' s s 1 ve
e ct proper - y. .,p'
sub je '6`
-se
-the ij'dnth6,4 -L'h t ovi 'es
s p q q.,4 a 1 C um st ah*c'e s,.,-n e c e s s i t a tJ n g a,varia*n*6e'�. Accord
h ',Ap lica,nt,.,.part. of - the-criteria--f- ec
'_,ng:,,t_o:,.t, e.,
or;.a sp ia 1
-an s u.
c 1 rqumstance,,inc lude. 16.7�at j oil , e
rro.un( in(
-Because of th.e'_'locati6n..'o'f,-':t d".
pr5perty. ,,.propQse� ,ex
n
_t',� sfbns., 'the' Applicant.. is t1i:rriited to expan'sidn
ization' and'
,n�eeds a, e.,in order- to:-�*ddVb',o the*.I�_i5ro
,anc
o- pe:rtylowpe' '-,'h-a'v6 -..'d n6.
rty ther,'pro h
rs in� t 'e- v i c i h
T e Ar6hite B d h C" has
ctural' D6sign -,oar of t e :.Lty"oC',E&n6na 0
recommended, appro-�;,al;'of the . r .tl�e
p.op6s6d�e ions b:
:��pans y:,
AiDi�1,16ant-',-, -(F.chelha �atnrt_'
r P q+. i I
- T e ica-n�� submitted 'that all building*s.'m�ust be moder�
�Appl
.;L-n or er o 't to be I 'e W a result, the
nize'd, d r
iyabl
.4pP1 icant 1 on I d6si'
y __ res to "mod
ernizq h
.is buildin
and no
special privi,l'ege'.is b�ing-,grc�inted t Applicant.
.o the�
(Echelbarger. testimony)
"Ebb Tide , i s,,.thq pondominiu.m.building t s.located -in
hat i
According to'�thie
*P vicini�y,. of-, the.subject. pro'(�rty.
4pplicant, this building ha's self-'-onta.in'ed improvements
that arQ used for- greenh-oup.es. '.'Th
is type of develoi
p qPt
is similar as' p:�Qposed by,the 'Ap th
plica.nt �and., e
Applicant seeks.s4milar treatment as owner *. of - t h e
s
qondo�.
t
Miniums in he Ebb Tide. (Ep.helbargQr.'testimony)
A witness, Schweh.m, submitted to
be thQ'o n e i;q of. the
-MAriner's kQme Owners As�5ociation which',is the assocj4�
tibn
of -the condominium q�?ners of tjj�Q §ubjpqt-,prQperty..
thp I-Iome 0 qe�r5 Assocda�'
.A.6c.ordipg tP the. 'wi' w
]-on
.5 lu_ p p q T, t s the request of th
Q App
�ic4nt but that the A' pli�'
_r e m!qi n liable for any"damage.9 to Qt' 6 p17'' : K
h ies
r opert
to.
t"A
-,a
-the
o f
in�4 nd�,
--,.,o,f -thb. city,:.df
g:�Examiner
'V��'14-8 P'C'k y t:., 5`
5.
4:
7- -n s ou, rqonstructi'
on' ocurr.
(Sch,�ieM`
h L d*
y
�s t '.:AA4
te `Onoii
19', - A:, wit
j. n e!5 s Dawson, questJon0d the blo(�kage�*, 'of
-ifi.--th6,variance 'is granted. ''The witn�e
s -w s* �'assure
s a
h
tliat view,'would not be 'impaired.'
7
QQN.CLUSIONS'
-d'atioh pprova, 6 11oi4
1. The a�pli :is for. a �O*f a. va r
a* d d i t'i o''n's' it* 6 the''pen oc ate'd',* a t 55,:Ald'er-.,- -
thouse�,;.'l
tr6dt-
4.t on 9 8 0 2 0' variance';,�.is,�i;-,y
E mcina-s, in
T e neques .'ed
or permi s s iow: -to.'exceed �'thrz'�'-Pe,r�'mi.tte - -height� :Timit"' f
r o pe'r t y* e,, ex-t6hs-i6h'9,-'
t
pu�d -o(J.ur -on' an existing portion �of,:,- . e. �s Ject.:�r* bpe-r-
thirty ', feet on* the subject.
:that exc'e'ed t,' Iiirty
s ..ie t- foot hbiqht,'limit. .'The
:A
:s. ruc ure..,:.is 'f or''ty fe
t t
t
At In o-rder. for.. a variance to-'be� -�ran:ted the r-iteria tas-..se
t
f6rts�.,in` S�ecti6n� 20.85.010 must be iTie t app. �ica. lon
-not,,*-sa i r e
sf 'ie 6: th e s e, 'c 'i t"2� i a
as
ot_exi't :f o.,
Spedial"cir6 tin4,`of
umstances do': n S
4% v,4 j�
n c e', �,-_Thp' s u �,, j e c t. property,;,,�as c e with�',th_e�
ill's e pf a var'i nce- and it:- appp4,rs,-.thAt, t�' 'uA sti.
e p_ r
-'to.ext6nd the. - '6n�f its of- the :�.ig n4_ -,var a 4pc
b
the',' 6s e I've s.:
app;'jcAtiqn ihdt th,e subject p' rty"
J pro e
't �special qir6iims
6;
.,presen for the," grab in5 6 a-
7
n p. o u 101 be e-6 1.'
The 5.r,ant f a�variianqe w, a a -I
privid:eg�e A_o, .
the" App�l i
Th e pro p ty �,:s zoned, PM-l.'5,. The-propert�.als6:-hat� a,,'.,land
e
% �i, .9 0 .1 ic y p n4
la.n. d e s'ig. V tion. of. h gh.,derisiE� 're'ide�ti
s al
1c
v: The Yeque s t. �.a be* -consis.tent and ' "'t in�.cohfl
to
no t
with, the-zo Qity of.]�dmond� a
p-i n g Qrd-nances of t h
e nd. the-
C
Qmp:pehensi:,�ie P an.
V e-w woul-d,be alte.r
_ qd 'and, th.e:requested' variance'4il,L'
y signiti6
preate an ant hazat-d t o tl)e public health'
-o twe If are'
�af e.ty r
71 p,quest is the minimi' -hel'Applidafit tQ
4m necessary for
develop. the property a�,; propo-5e4,.
Tp!it-'mony and evidence wer,,r4 received 'at the hearing and
-t h 0 y hav,;� been nolte�i
Rd
9%
-.'Dec'i s ion, o f, the
Find in g i,..and,
earin
dmonds
I%'- H g,.:,Ek am i n e r., o f t h,6- City 'of F
'R 14 5
e
VP
0A.
DECISION
:-Ba§'ed7 the-precedi F i n6l.
Upon�. ng ..ndings of Fact and.*, Cd u`
riy.� an
'iinb d evidence mitted a' the publi h�
s �ib i c earir.g:;-:.an
0 vlew.�'O,f'!
�upon,� -,.a',,impressions. of the -'Hearing Exami:ner,- n -a-�'
buI`l6:-,'ng:�bn,. which., th6'subject.., property is l*ocated*;!.,, it..,
-6 rb d t h at,' the: �c,'eques-Eed` to allow -,add'ii. "to
�-'otd
Z'. -,,variance
x-is ing �.-pentho�ls' the-, permit�t'ed "hei'ght..", :IMI of
irty.�.
'ocated,- -Ma'sh
f e 6 lt,,.. a nd., - i'sl: I 555.:-Alder_!Street', Eimon r: . vjl� ingt'o'
3d
d
i eni-ed.,-,r.**,,It is.-furthe±*,.:n6te'd.
S
ii-ice' 't�qu f i c u die te rt�)_* ni-�:' n i t 3. a 1
I�his... variE estwas
.,,:.verq 'di*
"re-
o. `.,reque'st,,-in :!c'ate's. -that -no*;.-..SP" f:* h
e d
-ecl Ic
k''d
ariance. uld- b''
No
P:U v.
oc e
rmance..� with-��-RM�I,
the ,'rp qu6 st' d ..vat **anc '-- �.76 ld:
i e u
Des-i-gn''Eion o*f�'the,' s'ubj6ct:
a
However. IL'�'r��
r y �.a s.- a.X 'h' d' 'A s e a] ' 're.'
t hig.. e si y....'e a a�
.�.,,,-view the�-.,histor �ol*-t i� case -it apbe'ars', thit,",thbl'
b- Id":
ul ing
of c d"'
-,with'*' he�' inother vax.-ance.. ..-Ha ',!th&t-'-Vdr
-:,,..was,,,co.fts'tructed ,use.
av6�`-b'een
id h' ;%thitty,,,x. ee
J�t�
oi� .... . 4,4.wfth,�-.t 'e varia�nce 'the; buil'din.q�, was,-,*a.116,,4ed,�*,td-,.,bt,,,.-..-f 6
f
--'.Thus,,:',...it-.' appears., t h i� t a n y e x' p a n* s -i o n;.,o''f o n s
t'ruction'-wxth�
thl s ';.add -ten,'feet-:bf heiqht.�'is an'. e"k,'"' f
in ;,itionr
7,;-; , - ' - . .1 -, _t. I . - .: p,ansio.n::.o the*t
0 g r1c - , ='
ance., -.��.No_ special c ircumstanceg*,�.'of,-:t-ii6::.,'pi6E5 ertY,"wi'th-'-
a'
�'u -"th'e':'aid:,of �-avdti nce' -:Ln.itially.-qra:nted f 6* rI: the" ey
relopmqr�t',
�pr-per.y-apppar. w6ii ld',
Tog'i'�ntthis- Va(r�'
4 a.:z,.nc
irig, a s ecj.6 riv*il-e�
P, -,p e
g
. a h. � i t h
ariances �very iAt - t, obt i -w in. 6� d-!L-ty-'-Qf Edm6nds
C 0
-,�-t e..;State� o W sh nutbn �:.Many :fadtor'
f '' i
arid;. h a s -as ndted�'above-,., mu-st
e t d-ris'i d 6r e d b e f or e th.e'var.iance can be-,'grinted''. . -Of ten':�_ imes
-be f air, . esp . ecia:11y
o't app'Qar .-tb
h
t e,, enial ofi�a variance.. oes �n
w'h eb`.'; c 'on $ i �,I e r'e.d'- w i t h .. t h e lim'zited potenti -consequences.
_al.
be, gj;,ant lis is sluph- a case No damage*�tp-other
:variance ed..r. TIJ
pr.operties'.Ibr:,to (Pth
w6uld�appear'-'to ekist
o aintain
should this ?�7a'rian`d'-'e'.-be, grant o,.4ever, in order-- t- M,
�H
e� -integrity ..of:, the -'zoning cod6s,and the. zoning .5tandards-within
t, h ty,- of - I�dmends
e. and, to pxevente>�pansion on an already nQn�.
S'ituatiob�.the v4riance m�st be denied.
c.qz f o:pm ing.
-4y p f July, �985 to the authorit'
..,Entered* this 3r�l cl pursuant.
the- Hearin 4miner under, Chapter 20.100 of- the
g,:ranted
qom
t, y I)evelopment.qo-de of the city o f. Edmonds.
71,
'y t,
f
Yindl n g s an'd':.D ci-sion, o .,%the
ing-Examiner o t
Hear f cl- f, di w
_y Q E mon s
Re .-N - 1 A 8 5.
P a*'
,k cje
'4"
VW
4TI.
;..DRISCOLL
fv
a r 2:n
v",
W4
-TO
NOTICE OF RIGHT. APPEAL
w it.
E6,. � i�p of-" S
r 'peal c-�Ileglng. speqif ic: error,... a�c't' or�,,.other around
-.f 0 VV� Ap'p e a 1 may�be 'f-i'led:'viith-*;tlie-.Pla*n'nin'g;-D6part'm6ht :-C,j;ty,;�'o'-f"
o 'd s'
n 'Edmondsi
..f IJ,
f the. -date,- of th&* Hdarihq IEx'-a'm-'in�er,s,,, 'Ir'Al V
011r.-
ac
is,'-mattec.any 'appeal- must be re d' the
ce'�ve :bj
men
to". 19 8 5.
P,�
prior,,- 5 00
Njl�, 7 j'". :-o.
C Y `,0 F E DMD N
A R
SERVICES
Ci�MMIJNITY;
'4
*t D E .19 8 5,�
2 1-;'
Oq,
Dris6ojj.��
1"I U
4 Y am 1 ne r
,-,,Heara:ng E
n� ktflll
e
5101" w
S6=6iid�4,AV
'Seatt16.,',�.WA 9 8 119
4
"-f-t J-0
S G
ITTING: N - LIP SHEEV, For, V-14-85
J:ASO ESTED �kxx
YOU'-REQU
YOU �:,'l N FORMAT I`0N:'
-AS D'.ISCUSSED:*
-�WE!i
FOR;'AP PPOVAL
R LE
4REVIEWIAND'-COMMENT:
TV
NT AND' RETURN:
Of,
MINUTES -OF.-MEETING:
+
REMARKS:
Collien Betteridge
PLANNING DEPARTMENT'
z
K. :Madrid.,
PUBLIC %,V.QRK$ PLANNINQ PARKS AND PECREATION ENGJ,�URING
T!
4w.
771
i't
I,r k7
-BEi &.1-F.
AN 0/6'R� I f�?f`e'WCC�f 'E" '-Or..Tllr'llEARI?l%G`EXAMlN R`srfNbiNGS'.-l-
V 'A k, JPY
V� TO
RIANCE,,.TO.;.ALLOW.,-ADDITIONS. PENTHOUSF,:,,�
--EX(trEDING THE PERMITTED— HEIGHT'. LIMIT..OF-"
;4.
3 1�f_.!,555 AL15ER'ST.**;
A W. h
o�l
G
ADDRESS
vv
4:
U.—W
oi
N
ly
11 L`4`
J,
V,
P. O..BCX )171' LYNNWOOD,*W.A3H1NGTOM 98036
7o
RR�'
t Y
Ut
t,
,!�O i,` b,
............
p.
n
uIx QF., E6m6�
p
e p a'r.t m e n t,
D J
an n1i ng,,,;
C Vtv (5 f
Ed mo n d
C e n t:e'r
T �'d W" 98020
on, as. i n 9 t 0
t1l.
�jTn `,G d n
emen
4-4, j
f '.,a, va-r'i -
I, w y,-f p rma 1.1,y:,::,p ppial t h e �'d en i a.]
ions, we,,,propose on th& P e n t -
-'o u s e., a t, 5 5 5, -A I d e'r S.t r i e
4,". W e'- Pb'el,'i e v e �t a t w e m eet ilk e r i teria as -.set f or
th
d,, t h a t t h e
n e c ,,"2 0 i ord'inances are e
.85'.Q.10* an
V' 'd ri: i s,t e r e d -.1 n an 'Un*f a 1:r ..man n 6
n m I
vra :request. h e'a r i n g e
f 'b f6re the C i t y
C u n c, i. rgvJ ew Ou
'0' UTI y r
request'.
P I e a e no t i f f
y us 9 ...t he -date of such hearing .
incere y_yours
Oein E c e I b a r 9 6 r
-DE :,f t.
0
I vl,�� I all—All.:f
U
"VI
4,
I
t�; X,
—Al 7
4, 1
l4v, 6
0
14
�N;
i:, X,
'too.
�41
A44.
z-Z
A , , -, - '. . ;*
tee
A-C
V,
Jir�.Az -tqi ;7. 7W
Y4
Fit
I A R -N N
MRY S,'
ft `ITA' Q,F� -Ebrm b CAI;
Q�, C YX
�M.�y n
CIVr-CENTE -.E6KiO�JbS:WASHIP)CIToN9CD2Q-'(2riCI775.2�,,4
M a r c 1985
X.
TO:,-:*-`,--- Bruce' F1 nke Planning- DeL)t
.,C3. 0
'ty�:' f Edmonds
0 tt: Snyde r
-Of f i6e.� of the'...0 i ty At torney
c ba�g"er CondQm
-.Va a y 5 964, Case No. V
ri'anice of -139
z�
yo u r,'�,requ e s t �i I Ilia ve reviewed, the 'documents -relatingto .-the -
�.st4 rig'inal-'grant-of. 'a". variance,: f rom-.. height a rid area r6s t r i c* tIons, *of
e on nd'j' -Code..;,
ia f ..(5
e. *a' Dj�gpe 1*16'hlt�----reques �e& a- se E-�b�aak v.a*r* nQ,6:-_"t'o:.�
v r f oir'E y 4 0 ):.r� ft :.�Neithex r, h'e'
'a. ance:tQ
1�:.. 1 A 4 n-d' anv n1ans or other
t on,: -nor. the ny co
't en, t the'
R
d raw "ng s� -wh i-ch :. spec i f i ca 1, ly pu t 1 i n e-,, the,,-,*nat-u re.. Q e x
4W I 'now,%unde rsta'na,.'j 1 s' that :,thie� current,
J
i-*i�',',",T�owheii7.s-�,,,Qt-�!;t-h,6,�'�u'f Id ing, h4v.e -madd. an4app ic
1" ation to c6nstrUc't-,a-
�vat_
r . ee.n-,hIou_se,,, a.pprox,ima te n e
y 71.7 h idh,, near the' Qxi s t.j. or
n `6
and,;..to expand. the,top.floor.'condominiumiby �moving, a
t� use'.
h�' "d a t -allS dq�.: three . tQ_ f ou�, f ee� for--.ajength
k-ILtc 'em:igni ;ng,�Area W
west, sid�q. 1�61d�h� of "S.' 8"�� Q t o th side,
greater
-.pa Qjec� j*�tc,�..s'p a height
r ar
. . pr
0 :at
tly -pdrm�ttecl t)y:the.z ning- ordinances. A
than that.,-"�Currem
0
". bEr"t
h k tchen ddition on the, west -end.wqujd pro3ec out
portion-
-e in.g the south' end of
b ath th e x i s'� roof*whi14
a.ddition"WCAIld pro'�ect out �Oypnd the. roof 4bo
ve iE. The'se
the.
h ig�th qr -an
j � j�cn s -wpUld also .�e --tate th that.currently
wl,
f
here. i'' ..whether or not the prigin
s .41 9 rant pf a
a forty..(40) f oo�t
Jn 19.6.4 P99mitting* coilstruc M
va�7ianq t
Tnaxi-mmm heighth sbou 10 b -ons trupd. as a qQn nu i n,q pe-missi' n �o
c
cons�gugt the c u r z; e n t i-mprovements.
"A
X
'04,51� Q WTI—,
n� k
'ini
um Unit:/Vari-ancq
er..�,; ondbii
-c ie-lba
M a r�c h 1'9'8 5' .2
VIV
4,4,
V tQ',the.-City un0er..the provisions,,roEM,
at
�iv We*- S e c 10 0, 5 A 6 3 11 Q I n a d d i t i o n t o. o t h e r'. r e s t r c t. i o n s,-, tj�e!�q,
on,
Edmb 6 d s.-' % C o mm 6'n'� t y,".' Qe'.,�i e 1 o pm e n t 'Code - orovOes '.-in., Secti
4,' - 'hAE
- 010 ( fl�t the� approved variance- -i's the minimum
.85,
e �6
n ce sar Y
"O'w
t -,the n6r:the right*s en'jpyed t�y 6tl�6r prop'erty
i n,.'t-h e'
IM!
v I c'! n -'w i: t h thesame- zoning., '? basis added.
..Th� i n �ion comp I i es v i th the g n u
ance provi e e r al'.-. r 1 e 'that:
-va --granted
riances and: ex6eption.s. �ire to ..be
s aeihd jn.�rare s 'a n d U n'd 6r
ins'tance
;X
p ecu i a r: and e kci�pt tona I .'c ;Xcums tan 'ej"'
or c
i ty for the granting o E - v�rian es does not
nfer�ijpo
c 0 n��.-the�'prop ty�:,.owner an'-y-,,,,legAl .-right
or, exce
pti * ons is g V T1 for, relief in
5pe CI � 1 circumsEanc'es pecQlAar to their.,natuge.
h wi,se, Z'on'in_ "r I�tion' w-uld 'be�'�em'as6lateo
U 8 0
9 - eg
d'
by-. except ions -'�Lin t �J.,a ll,.' -lah,and �.reas' h �w&uj
p. 6
-e d 'z6nih*g-�jn.. effbct would*.b'P
sapp4R-lr,,' i
`it'h*as been*said ning
estro
d yed that
'd'land" varied, spari-n
or'dihance shb U be "r 1 9� i I
9, Y,r
'andthat -in',"t
he-. i n'te �es t - of the, general'-publ'iic,'
4 -var,igin e zo p
iz from �h.e' orlgin.?i p in
jan' s�ould
bQ �rel'ativqjy ap r-.igid as the plan it'sdlf."
_McQ. ilTin , :Muni i�a, oratio". s,' 3 . rd-'F� d .-Re
U
c, vigpd,
Par.. ment,,60' F31.,iJ.,Idinqs
P t'qv,c�'�"inq Qah4 e
-5 _-404.�:
3 -2 A., 2d
for,,Manchester,: I I N' -H. 122,'
based,'upo'n- thiD' premi -the to
a that
n r �s
p -m .-variance
sAs' not thi�.' p6w6r alter cha�?�a.cieri.�Ei6-of
p i c-t*s*. A" l.�of:',Dur�lapl
zanin'g',� p A .' 3l, , 87 Atlantic. �nd
.,Pea..
295.'' Th6'r6fei�ei%the- general,,: rules !a,nd.� the, ci ty'p own ordinance
Y-.Marrow view of �hegr a*nt�*o'f a.uthority Linde
t a
variance' lt�� i s - my qp i n �on' that A- � interpr.6tting the specific
gr._aMt-,�f-:-'va'ria'nc,'e irbm 1964, -y66 should take an extretel
y
e n a q row v i e.w Notel� also, that the-'g . r. nt - O,f a
ro�i�;riqtj'v. :_an
v4rian,ce js,.nqt-- an amendm-e,'�it t. 9 "th ,Qni-nq provis�pns,
i� 7 therqfpTe,
t Kq 1 �'6 4 v r
�ppiance does hot Qreatq a new forty (40) f�oot height,
jimit.4�ioq a
but rather permitt,�,d Only the Construction of
c 1.,11 in t,h e --dan es
a r Ouilding in o T17 d e r to take. a d v a nt A %4�. o,f var. q
While .�herq a re nQ Ida,91hington cases in this. Area, h p 4p is law
-bs
pop, 0 4 h,e r urisdiQtiops, which indicates how su eqppn.t
co,ngstrgction r p. Please
- ?hpuld �p received u n'd, e r p.rior variane
in*.my
np.te discuqsion �hat the variance we are reviewing.is a
re a 'v' -�4nce a'n n a !"0 $e variance. That i $ e�r_
�r d pt , I � I ;
'hqjqh� ?tnd pe ton5. �of, �.he Zo,ri.ng C-,Qde: ded
were varie.
A
4,;
,R7
--c
T) I
k 441 i i g pep t- Edmonds 4
--con ominiu'M-,(jnit/Va�ia'nc
O!Vr
T_, E chelbarger
Mar6h�._13 1985 .3
WiE r e rd- tp,� o partirpula� c1ppItpant. T h� is*, wa s - nQC a 'g ra n t 0 �4, aA4TijVi
Variance to :use the propc"rity 'in:a cert�in�.way, but,ratKer.: to
-11 t h 6 b'u r d
dbi� i6te 'a. p a r.t. i c q 1 a r construction. A_ddi�tiona y,
J.: ., _1 `jj,,1;,: ., , -,, P .
,j I . I I.-.
upon `,'th'e' apol j da n t* to esta.blish the exj,�tencej and extent of,.�av�,v�,,
x
v r i a'nc6.: A court liar, held that a I va riance g nd'
a rant d�d: '�b 66
-clearly i on the app
a* lication
rea which was not, n
n to,,, a n
.;port:ion', of the 71 J:ea
a S,� for which 'the v,�riance was. soug, t
Hazel- -vs .' Metropolitan Development Commission, 289 E....*.
nd., App.11972); see *alr:?o City -ci -Sast. C h i c a q 0, s 7
2d 308 (1
-aTr
S., n- 1, Re f Co., 2 3 2::., 1 n d . 295; 309', 11 1-fl . E 2d 4 5 9,,:,�(.1 9 5 2
-th."
_�_eTr7�,c o Li t a
'r s h 've als�o'.:h6ld'.that .*where a buiilding�----a'u'i' oriz.e.d'-" .
h*ad' be'
by,,�var i: tPn de's t'r*byed by'' f i.re,-'.-thd' courLs 'have-
t:,j
ca*r�.f u 1.'., to .1,i'm it. cons tru,c't-'io'n'-. t o,.'a duplication of re,s,
in -e�ist' suant to',�..t'h'e.v'ariance and,hot to allow�.,,
ence pur
'Ga
e n- 1 a'r g 6 m e n t See Industri-al Lessors t Inc. vs. City of.Ga
Super;. 181, 290 A 2d.-7-37 (1972),- ceet,.'.:d6nie'd- 6j%W.J--`,-
.,A, cith.,',riecent- cases :and a
6 `293 2d.�:390 .(19.72) B,. R thkb in
-Plannin i nd id,
'the'trP_'A,tise'.'Th6, Law of :Zdning'?*�tnld q? ate
E i7 J c t:* 1 i m tt aTlo -no f variance, a u i7_67-i-ty ains the !1*aw..
s rpm
�,Af fords: relie
'liter'al
cause�a variance from
enforcement- of . a. zoning,prdinance*, �t shoul,d b e,
..... .....
il�t.�y ponstrued to 11mit-,relit6f to the"minim6li",
-the hardship."
variance -sufficient to relieve
R athkbpf vol�. Y, pij �8�62
-that when a.landQwn:er at t e!T!p it s to
Nevad6'�h'as�'adopted the rule,
6 x1p z,i n d, the., �copp - o E a ' in existi ing variance, ' the-scope-of,the
1.�r i . ani�d`sh e r i d
v 6u 1:d be d te Ti 'ne ':by.dcnsi*d-_ri`ng tibrts, Of
it h e a p- pi 1: 1 c. a nit,'.t:'ah'.d � t. h 0 ' i n t P n I ' of'7 th7e'-,.v�rdapce, a the.. time_it..,-.
t was'
In: 5oard of Comm.i.ssioners v.s. Taq�art.0 C.,
i:,5 s onstr. "C6; In
9 6 "1. N6'v 7 3 2;r 6 15 V.: 2d �9,65 7'71; `th� "Ne,�&da Supr9me Cou�t held
t t6qu red...
�tha:twh6re an, original varia.nce was si he
ns.ons of the original uses and applii: t��.Qns,,,a Co t
P. , I . �1` . ., , . Lj n , y,:
b
1 n1 oArd's denial of a permtt for. the additional'operation,
g..
s i p.m J
a 'd' a tas t h a
'Review. of t he. i'm i t i Lz 1 a pp lic tion .,In. ic- it is silent
egarding the exact, 'dimensions of the s.tructure to
c t it h e burden Wou-1d b.ri o n:
nstr ed. flocat, ;a t he applicant in
CO
cgse to es I ta�bjlis-h their'e,nt�ttlem va�iance":, becav
e r� it, to the se
the initial appligation does hot speak to the exact. nature ct�f the�
buil, ing- permi,ts is ximately
t:hle. oriqinal sued,appr,6
y e-a.r s ag.0 w U. W h i 611
twenty c for CQn'S't'1�'UCt'o_n cif ;b. ildi'n'gs
hA.Ye beiin in a n.0 becaq*e t I? var,
lace, cor m&ny ynarSr,
9 raht-A,�O was - no� - a wa1v6' t iond ng p r,ov i s i o'n s, �ut rather a grant
6f , Mi I nim",im ej�l,�ho necessary. ,to avoid h�..;:%drship,. it ts'�my,
00 n -oh. thelt:� Y-ou Sho r Y F!Ar.rPW-
u i(I ev i-6 t� pp 1i ca t j�an' in, a ver
t r i -ti, -it ner-with �the burd.efn being on t h-e applicant to,
a.n 0- c me--m,
f
.ee
uc J
rfie
S';
4n
E d mo d s
ucei-vinKe, 4. � -
Le
unit va nc
r_ lu cl y e n �om 1. n i u m
"ll el.
a r .3
m c h,,�r
e s'u��b i § t h 6 t'..'t �'e- i n t* en* t `6 f 'th*e' ori* 1'. g ran t;, encompp'sse'd w
gina
-current'itreques J t -i al-so,,�:;;m 'o'*
Y, pinio
e n.,,'o, t:� -z 1� h'e-O"
'd 4�tha
Pos* 't iow,%4oul vre':�:,S- ou, e
t
rm 't t , e'd �ro ii F� th i n%wared 5: c v r. r e n tl y,.f.'a u I
r e"n'E -*h eTg t
A * �N'. A
ruc t 1 dm-;prob6se d si` 4 b o* 6e. co L U �l L.-L I. t:; 1-.,LiQ III a
o, -:46*
ar', to- haVe, be e n� ,,a p d t T
n t p"e' ticipate .,:nor.:ia,
e _Y
t o b*g_*, i s s ui P' d e r m i;
"ca n
an
they, sho!uld;-d6��,`so-.on--`t e" basis ariance
of a new v a p. p ro v. ad
r
w S/�,
S
�21 ki
q
3
A
4-,
xl�
4. X� -
�K
1'7
'Councilmi-ber Kasper aling with come''
m expre-sSed 'concerin, im using the assesfied valuation when de r
4,
al :ljn4. Referring -to an ordinance adopted. recently*by the Counci I *perta Ining to vacation*of
h F-ways he
-
r1i 9 t -o , said he believed the ordinance de'al t with residential vacations. � He* said .1 ac k
a Current�assessment might leave:.the Council.open to criti�ism. -at* h
f He will iny6stiq e t a va I ue
and, the � rildtionship�'of, this property. tii�..the , arkpt, '. COUNCILMEMB�R KA5PER ;MOVED-. ��CONDED Y
A
.,COUNCIVEM8ERkROQUItT*, - rdJ 6NTINUE. THE HEARING 70 AUGUrT- 20 AND
C 'CLOSE THE -AGENDA FOR%THAT� EVE
'NING.
P
Councilmember Nordquist asked�if the staff had received adeQuate instructions. :Councilmem'
�.ber, KasOer. would I i ke" to have v currint 'valuation of the'property and thelollite of't�e County'�,
a ppro i sa I a nd - val ua t i on, he :said an�,appraisal was not necessary. CouncilmCmber Dwyer'.said: this
ff, Q v6 �oul� necessi tate. provision� of.- an. opportunity for rebuttal by the appl icant� moving any,
4
resolution-int6:September. �He added that -the applica6t must kno' is fi 6red
w how the value 9 in,
order to:addres's the -value., -*Mr. Snyder,agreed that any . change in the figure must come-in,a* form
be-included'in
I ip,
can the record'and cam be' addressed by the applicant. Mr. Snyler'noted that
:v',
:the. ordimance'previously'- referr�ed 'to- was pa�se -cdndu�ting
.d to'spare the staff the necessity of
',:'that, 'rty
appra sa Notin the prop is. not typical . 11
a e said the figures before -the -Counc i 1� were
not,diveloged,.by.the s t'a ff bu t were ta kem-'from the Cou n ty. a s s a s smeni. MR_ NOROQUIST,WITHDREW,,'HIS
MOTION'. MOTION 01 ED FOR LACK OF'A SECOND.
6u c I E'
C N M MBER:YASPER MOV ED _-S ECONPE D FOR D I SCU 5 $ 1 ON By. C OUNC I LME148 E R JAE CH TO CONTINUE THE HEAR-
I NQ TO AUGUST'.20 TO REVIEW THE VALUATION,., - Covnc 1 Imembe r* Jaech asked if the staff, are to obtain
a n, appraisal to whi*,.h-,Counci lmember. Kasper repl*ied that that was up, to them. wishes toknow
the,date"of the :As,lr�ssment, if -it As four to-six-yej rs eld-h. will ask �for a new.appraiial.'- H'
th is-C urrent and matches other properties in the area, he would see-
eiassessmemt, . no nied.for,an
%
appi�ai sa I ...jol I owi ng, a :suggesti on by tou'nc i lmember Jaech that requesting ?�n, appraisal ;pow.would
savd;timt',Ms,-.1 816ak'said the.time:'re�dired-,fg��'an�apOrei al-,i significant and �c
s :04"'ost itoul'd'.
................
appr �"appral sa I � fs-.-des ired
oach.$2 000.,-,':, 1 f, an sW suggested -h rin6
conti.nuing. the ea �td.a' date
fUrtherin "to'.
the.�futu.e., I h�'o rder determi.ne i "' a del ay, would pose �_problem for.the_4p plicant,
--R
COLIN ULMEMBE -OWYER'MOVED�:'$ECONDED�':BY C EMB.ER WLLSON;� TO , E N THE
-COUN- I.LM -PU$��,IC HEA R'kG. M6-'
T10H CARRIED
Anmette:Ulu1nd,,.ReaI Estate.zTri,,s� Officer�.wit� R;inier:,Bapk; -said. there 'are no definite pla'nS *for
.;the: ty -at,.thi-s time',,but the 'plans cannot be made unt-i I -c a ted.
the alley is va She said
the -to pay the unt
y!hpvc�copperated�with)'t q,City,t obtain the vacation and have agreed� amo re-
qyested..t�;She said� they would�prcfer to have i t, settled this e,i6ning' but if, the hea ri ng is contih-
yed, she'would-like to know -'in -oroer".to be present Councilmornber Wilson asked If'she were aware,
of how the�yalue
was placed-om the' c assess d'
prqperty, to w� i' h- Ms . Ed) und rep) I ad th�a t is the-a
*because
a
Yalue;,.there are-no'.recent'appra' i sa 1 s ownerish i p' ha s not cha nggd for. many years. She sa i,d
she. i s"a new 1trus t"tiffi.cer to 'the account 'a m is' not-�fami I iar with Edmo ds.values'. Mayor. Naught-
c I ed the' hii ri n� 'E N
am,- 0 . A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAK -ON kOTION TO C014TI14UE HEARING, COUNCILMEMBERS
-
HALL WPER,% JAtCH A� D WILSON,VOTTING�YES;% COVNCILM;MBERS. DWYgR, AND NORPQUJST VOTING NO., MOtION
. �., ,
I
URRIEQ
C ound ember, Dwyer su qv.ted that staf�f 'determine the date of assessments on any 'future item of
Y�
this t P,: .
*
'A
EAR-1 NG rONyAPP EAL- 0 F,-, HEAR I N G -, E X AMI N E R : DE C I,S I ON' JO 1"ftli Y-*,.VAR AN!-, E.' To ALLOW nbj�j' SITO,PE*NTHOUSE
AT-- - 5 5 5 -. A LD E R, '-�A�PELCANt:*,,-,,.DEAt(,ECH�LEARGER /.VT. 14 8 5
Ks "'Block tS e` a p'
re�iewed p�al:'before the Council The staff recomendp adoption of the Hear4nq
Examiner.rec.qmmrid4tion to deny�tha.variance request; she saAA, Tr iinsparencies were show depict-
-'Kasper
ing �he pro.p.osgg additions cl lrr�mber asked ho. t as �a d8lt,-io�s'diffe�,e� fr h'
a Am t ose
'At' the Ebbr Tide. hi�. Block:r.eplied that the Ebb Tide -was a tol;all -j.qspg s.tryctVrq with e,ist,
.1 .
'ceiling
tnq,�jalls and floor,' the addit:0 a's
'I m w ass wa, s on the open side.
91
Noting that Ahe' Hearing E�aminer seems to adopt the staff positio' in this matt 'r, Councilmember
n e
7
-sked if th
Ow�y?.r 0.� a_t position wquJO be t.hq' saint it the c.odq had allowed a buil:ding to be AD ft
wh �njhis bvilding was con�tructe,d.and, the code had 009e.g later. Ms.. Block said. it -would still
'Councifirtember
be. t orming 660ding.,
.49 axis ing nonconf Dwyer asked whether t-he issue is, that a:
prior varia'pce had been granted or that this is a nonconforiiiiiiq struq.tVre. Ms I' k ' I
B. oc rep ied
q� the applica:tian doei:m'eat ie e'a
v r I of the criteria for a variance; ho.weyer, there w'as no way
�4
to see that this was a s p.gc i a I c i ricums ta Q�e, cr94 �ed. by the lo t. or p.�.us, A I tu _t i 0 -'b"t subsian�
t1:4te, a yaria nce. Mr, Snyoq r 44id.� theA.nitial respomse to the 4ppl.icatiom was that it seemed
_h
prpsem, ng probIgms. An �pimioh wa�. req in,
.-yasted fram',the C-ity'-Xttornqy�si 6�ftc� ar� reiea'rc d
'law
ca.ted cliqt national is clq�r that omcq,4 varj�nce 'has 0eqn esta"bli,shed. the building 6stab�
s,h,e s ttie extent of the nonconformi-ng use. and% the variancf! for the future' Mr.' Sny�q.r sa . id he
fe Lt. a variance would.." mqcjssar to p,rqceeq.
y
In _r�rerqn�q. to the Hearing. Ex -am iner�s statement that graoti�iig ��hc tyairiance would be a special
p -ivi'lege, Councilmember. Dwyer asked if this were gonceived *0 be a�soe ial-priv;le a b
'ecause it
inq, a variance to :a. nmcomformi.n,q.us� Orr -because. it is
1.s qran�z, granting a Mar ia,nge t.o a prpj.ec t
-
that ha- !Ir6ady- had a variarce. C ounu m i t 0
y Services OPrect- eter'kafin'reiponded tha-t' it �e.
%
EDMONDS C COUN,Clt, MINUTES
e 4 Au.gvst 6, 1985
ff
!2111
7
0,
7
c
I th� Oara9raph,8A,`no special c I re umi t I
ei'*to' all of the, cri te�ia I is ed. starting w ric e 6y
e
A tence of� the prior �ariance,nia
sked,.i f the -'exi s tenc of.-the',:nonconforming use o r the axis kes i t, a...: -
�j s pe c I a p.r I v I I eg e,w to, 9 ra n t - another.vari?nce, Ms 8 1 oc k rep I ied that -the staff fql L i t :�tas :not a%,
hardship' situatiok",that. woul'd-substamtiate a varianc f
e*,, rom 'the sp�cial,'�ircumstanc.es.�f' the aw.
T. 0 member Nyeir'askid A f enial' s�ould'be.ihat there.is no spec I a rcum, -
'C uncil the': reason 'for. 8
stance. 'Ms., 6.1 oc.k* rep I I ed - tha t, tha il w961 d �. them-'rrta ke 'I t a, s pp' I,' pr I e9e.:. ln�.addr6is*i'ng'.
% a v
bas i s - for .-the -s
pecial,-privilege drg6mgnt, Mr. Snyder *said_-that'arises I n.' a situation where'thdre
is a.�s.pecial-,tqpographica�l :problem and a varian.,;e i�s den.ied for -one or two of the propertits,,.bUt
-not the others.-
c, nci member.Hall sai�,'�irspace in:a.nonconforming building that might be enclosed might':ni�dca
0
,Q� variancqibecau�e�.of:m4s , but n,ot.-because of height. * Coun' il ' mb�r Wils"n a.sked' f'r.clarif'c
�1 4 c me 0 1 a
tjQn of.langua
_ge, used by. the City Attorney durJmg the A08 meeting,that cohsidered,this.'.applica-.:`
ti.on. in reference'to being,able to rebuild',to-the general outlines�of a bui lding,,'that,. has.,. %
y, b6irned.' Mr.,-�Snyder :s a . i d' I he:'wa s % quo t I *ng .'fro - two see
m ses t at m6d 'to '�e t. the na t ona' .'s tand4rd .
He $a i.d it nes' of ai bui lding.;'tha� ha�'-iburne there-
Z,- I s- di fficul t:,to determine. the, preci se outl I
f�re',`�the buildinj may be rebuilt to --the' geiierpl outlines.but ma -be'e x ded' I �'ahys I'
y not pan
gnif
w
calit _�ay.'-:6uncilmember -Wilson noted* that -this appqars to b,e.:a gray area' in- hi b -�uie-of
e
c ornmon *sen se by. the Co-.jnci 1, i.s. nee ded �,n- hia k I ng 'a dec i-i i o6.,. � He ia I d' he, finds d I ff i.cu I t to',.be'
-','opposed., to _sTething �hat is not- hurting. anyone. Councilmember.Kasper.noted that:,.the balcon e , s
on -the E4� Tide -are closed en both.gnds and.thi.s ba.lcony-is-.not) he -does- not* see'ony -real 'di-f , r
er
enc
Qean.Echelbarger,� 55,5 Alder St d st'ribu'ted phot'o's'.'of thei
-area,involved I n �t h e propoted:addi-
-of,,,t.e r re,
tions He described -the diffi�ultiles% th�y have,g)epir.ienced in'.obtaining apprpy41 h I'
�for
quest !variance' ;noting that anyone liying'at ground-i-ev l-w'
a ould,have already boem'-granted a
r, "
:variance Vte�.onq hearing'WIth th.e,ADB. Because- they are -.I n�.a 20 :ye-ar - 61 d Su il 8 1 6g-A?i'ki s over
-th�.new height limititio - ns:, he said they must Opply.fo , ra-variance to modify t . heir.,h6m6.t He -then
d �crib�dj.the:soecifi.c -chang h h' `j'rel" �6'fore the -
es es,they-w4sh :to make, se w t t e_,,picti
rding 6' n f�,spg� a
-Referring to-,ihe'C6�inunity�Devel6'p".n.t Code,, 20.85� rtg� e defi-ni'tio,
Councilo.,
circumstance, -:he said �tfie,fact,they.�are 'Ov-rheig'hi makis,i't a special �irdumstance. 'He. said -he
has ot been -able -to determine-from,ahyone;what'the'speciol.privilegq 'Might be, that: i-s �being
�'al 1pdeO, to. ' M�'. Ech�l b,arger,%'s' 69ges ted that.ithere are many others in the City who�shari 'their-
;tio'n , I n. overheight 'bqi Idings 'H�:;sa I d'.:�enyi ng' � em-and oth dom'
S I t'u h imium,owners,6�.righf
er com_
to..-renodel thpi�`homes;js-denyin,q a p,rivi I age.: that. is all.owed evAryone-else' in -t6wn.,_-Vhen %the
coil.e', ap to b in -conflict', he :s id there mit be.'siome pr
p- ears, e ovis ion , �or', i ssu I ng perm ts or ot er
peopi e,may not' as k' for' perm'i ts to remodel -thei r. hor�es% ', Mr.. Eche - lbarger: compar, is �x I p.e I rience
ed h*
ioned not to builtl,.anything pri , to.approval o )ariinc 6
before--the-ADB,' where'lie was caut e y
t�e_Heairing,;Exminer,-,with -that of, an',4pilicati6n by'the; City for a.greenhouse, which had already
p
been -bui I t, before- the ippl tcation, came before the.,08; - He. then discusseo -the remode-I Ing of-:
the
'there
tbb e *and,,sai'd* was ;O,buiiding 'permit- i�s�ed-.fqr that, ;9n,struc,ti.o.n. Submittin§,that the
-has, the:.authori.ty to,
make a :deciiion" to approve thi'; pr9ject', he �aid denia.1 would deny
thpru the' r I ght 411 owed '.a the r c I t I z e ns' I n 'Edmonds.
As-kida'by Co'�mcilm ni�er 'Nyer to desc I ribe the specio lb
e
.1 circumstance he perceives', Mr. Eche a.rggr
r plied:that,the height of-theii building:c�eates a special circmsian�q, ko sai'4 heights, were
j;t'being addresse.d, but A special circums�'anc.O tha*-t.a succeeding owner may wish -to corre�', He
is not try, ng, to correct the height. He does not believe tfiat..a vori�nq,'
I I I I _.. q, s,hould* have been re�
qyi red to bui ld* the 4�provemjenis .
Councilmeti,her Dwyer askid,why the Ebb Tide wa; not required to obt.qin building pormits for the
ren.9yations. Ms. Block..replied that,the City Attorney at that time agree4 that no variance would
be required on �a . 4 'did
the� st, since the modific.ai 6n� not exceed thip,present'ro.of ine, repl4ced a
rPv1,qu; trim a'n d ceeated,-no li-vAnq space. On the west side� she sa d t_ere wos qxist�
iq9 ��ace,witjh,yalls,. floors and �eflinqi. -Mr. Snyder said 'the �revlou� V�y Atto
rney- rendered
an -on he EIE Tide.. He rernar�ed that this -I in' area wher
opinion b. c zoning cod r� r�eqg i rqq tq
ps a
ave a- degree of fin4lity wi th eqy�l protecti .,n vn er ay.
h 0 di '�je The-y�riaAce applies when a per-
S Pon woul4be deprived olf the ecenomic viabil ity 9f their nrop�rty, he spi4. He read a portion of
the Co�e relating to special privilege. �ontrasting tF.e. improyeTent$ mpoe to the �Eb� TidQ on�
the.proposed ald.�itions, hV. said the Oroposal V'oild.�.
v �xtand a portion. of,the building*rathjr than
pxistirkg space.
No t accepti.ng tha�t there is special pr�ivileqe, Councilmomber Dwyer asked for -a response regard.ing
�the elevation 6f the building cons'tttuitin'q a' speci I al cir cyT'staAce. Ms, Slqck, r epl I i . ed 'that it is'
.4 special circumstA c r' the Gw, r 11 f M
ncq bull it was eated by m6r Q,r'prtevio-us owne 0 th6 propert r.
Echel 6a
"er rep�icd that the statute, doe� no -the height of the struc
t have referepce to ture.
Mayor �aOg4t�en closed the p4blic hearing,
�qqn5ilmember Hall. said the first gonglusion on page 5 is not corrm;� onj she would like the .
!1earing �xa�iner to spell i� out fo� her. She so -id there I pla
s pn overh4ng in ce q n 1 Koy S�n i
then ex,ceed,thp height. Mr. Sn'�q' explaine'd t6at i t' fLi I I s in additiomil a' I r sp4ce.and iocnea s es
y r
RMON15S CITY �OQNCIL MINUTES
Awgust 6, 19.85
j
'A
7-7 2— 7�__
, 7 '7
L
4V,
4
T
thi'de6ree'of.nonc.onformity C6;i'nc i lnemb.er H4 I I spid th i*s s deA I i.ng. with mass not hei
said she,-vou).d_not,-,be 'conifortable with any vote. ta�en' on his
C6unc'iIme-mber-Jaech`noted thaL:the' Hearing'Eyanimer discusses 30 ft., I.initation and' it -should he',,
%
refcrring,to,a:-25. ft.,. I fmitation.-. Ila v i ng rcvlewed�the criteria and not bel ieving th'at o*n.- 6 1 e a 'I)�;
-d
tion Over 2.5- ft.. , is d s pec i a I �,q: I rcvms-ta nc,e -and bel i ev 1: nq - th,a t','gra n t i nq - the, va r i a ncf -'wou I ,conf&'
'v
",
2,
.a-speci al..,pri tha t the - . . : - _
i I ige seeing, vaniance may 9 r may . not be in conflict with t;te pu . rposes* . o
fi
'would
t
rehensive Plan,
the, Comp be 11 ev i n 9 the variance be in.-confl ict, wi th the �qninq- code that,'*
It -' r -not p
I Of the '40aA�c would yment
em-E �f - the -cri ti i a �does 'ipply"and.'denia _rohibit enj6 Oir 6,�
pr6p�rty,,shewoold.-havd,to v�ote pg4init. the .4riAnqe.
ounc
T V i I i�imt;� r Kfspe r bel iqve * t his sh o6ld,no A d
S t'h4vc been a variance: requirement by the.City n
does-.Wot *bel ieye - the City should be intruding into the interior of the btlilding., He s 'a i:d h e
-w ould.-vote to overribe the Hearing Examiner's decision..
-.J 1
OU C m
`C n"ilm6' ber-Hal I sai,d she would refuse to vote because this is a poor e�x�mple- of e r i t-p'r i a'. She t
would, like to havejt!.cleancd-.up.1!,It was generated 6y the City.Attorney,- who second quessedrth
Heari 41Exbm6qr-'i 6 terpre to t i on.
COUNCICMEMBER.rASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY:COUNCILMEM�ER WILSON. JO OVERRIDE THE HEARING EXAMINER BY-:
I RTUE . OF -THE, FACT. THAT Tf!iS,WAS'NOT-A VARIANCE ITEM, INSTRIJCTING STAFF.',TO ISSUE,NEUS5ARY-PER-
''MITS.,AND'OETURN NEARING EXAMINER FEE.: Because�it does not -address, the j s-sues '-ddunci Imember
Dwyer wi I I - vote ago i nst � the'mot I p n. Counc i I membe r, Ja ech sa i d 'pa ; s age 0 f the,..mo ti on.. wou I d.f. be - a
4,
.��e'.pre�edent or .'al I types.-of� 661coniei',and -extended decks : in t:he Ci ty. She-said.thi 'vcould-be" a
dongerovsi precedent. — C66'nc� i lm'ember Aa I I �ia i d she , may uationiho Id
-abstain and,this type,'of.sits u
fied�Anj the. Corn
be, c I a r i iuni ty,,Sorv,i�ei Commi' tfee;_ Counl;' i I'member Nordqui st questioned -the ' r'dl*n'
wo
, . . I I
ol a
of, the m6t i bn'ttha.t:dec'l aris' th i s:. i's , n- yari.ance and then'overrides decision-of,the..,' Hearing_'�.
Examiner-.'rega'rding-,a-.varian�e� � COUNCILMEMBtR. -KASPER AMENDED HIS -MOTION TO -INDICATE THUHEARING..'
-THIS CASE,SINCE THTS-WAS N
EXAMINtR', HAD JIIO�JURISDICTION:, IN OT',A.VAR'IANCE 'ITtM,':BAStD'-ON'PRE`ViO_
T
;.—FACTS'PRESENTED-TO THEICOUNCIL AND,PRFVIOUS Acilom' OF THE CITY. ...Because of� t,he 6ange -in"mo-
MI.
tion Councilmember Wilson withdrew-his.s.econd' t the . mo t i on MOTIO FA L FOR LACK.OF A SECOND.
I
....Cou*ntilmemblir Jaech noted.. that� the variance had been reqUired-on advice of1egal '�ciu'nsel.* Co*uncil-
*that
member . K4 s pii r. said the'. appl ican't -had, fi led for'a, varia.mce' on ba,sis bu-t Mr."Kasper'do6l not
agree,.that A tL.,should have variance i teM� , COUNCILMEMBER, KASPER t�`CVED THAT THE COUNCIL� FIND
THAT THE HEARING:EXAK114ER-LACKED UURI$DICT ON TO HEAR.THIS VARIANCE IN'THAT.'THE,REQUESTEO 'ACTION
I
CjEV_*wITHIN THE;BUILDING SHELL AND �JHERE FORE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EXPANSION -OF THE EXISTING
I., N NCONFORMING.,USE. 40TION;DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
0
n
Cou*n'C 1 lhember No I V said:'it is apparent the lssuejs not.glqar; but she is.not sure hoVAt should
be � ha�d 1 ed:� .-Mr.- Snyde r e.xp 1 a i n ad that; in his Opinion, the it$,ue 'of-, spqcia:1 circumstanc . es. . upon -
which the Coumcil..decision hinges is clear as stated in.the City Qrdiwce., ' The -is s y.�e of whether
A
.
A variancli7was�required in the first place, �e said hat no clear WashingtDn pr cqden.t. An issue
q.
-ould be �emancled to.the Hearing Examfi,er, he added , i to exam"
that%c ine whether he had jurisdicr
tion�to �onside� this matter and whether,tbe variance is required Coyncilmem�.cr Ha-li said -the
�Another
stiff',,madQ, a decision on i nq a permit was ed, nowp the st�ff was,not
bvildi - on. not is�u
willing.tQ,.make a similar,decisio.n�on this. In addition, she said there are two 61ferent in.terT
P�etatirons-regar�i ng-pnrograp
'-,,"COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED TO ADOPT'THE R�COMMENDATIONS OF TH�'HEARI.NG-5XAMINER. - MOTIO� DIED FOR
LAC K.OF ` A SEC ND
1-,� vi`e�.*of the unclear mature of this issue referring to the introdwctory.parograph and the
conclusion of the Hearing Fxominer� report, �ounc Imember Nordqvi st said he does hot bOlieve the
'Hearing Ex4Tinqr made a case. COUNC I LMEMaER NORDQU I ST MOVED, StCON,OEQ' BY COVNC I LMEMBER KASPER,
THAT THE COUNCIL OVERRLDE THE HEARING EXAMJNER'S FINDING$ AND PERMIT THE' VARIANCE. A ROLL CALL
VOTE WAS TAKEN W.ITH COONCILMEMBERS,HAI.L, KASPER, NOR6QUIST A14D WILSON VOTING YES; COUN61ME�BtRS
DWYER AND JAECH.VOT* NO. MOTION. CARR I ED.
y
Councilmember Hall joid this -topi,c:,#qyld be disqy5seq at 4 Corrx�iqnity 5 I.ces meeting..
-meeting
May.q.r Nought qn recessed the for eight minutes., recopv�ninq �t ?:59 pjp�
T
ON REDUCING SPEED LIMIT TO 20 MPH ON SUNS ET AVE.
�Jty Engineer Jim #dam� said this w4j recommended by the Sunset Ave. Comi-ttqe and the 7A I i c . a.
'slAght
Dept. He sa id there is'a addqd h.a7ard due io' th e 4ngle parking. qouncilmamber K�sper
asked what cri-teria are used in measuring speed, sincq -in post cases the am6r'49"e sp��ed �as been,
and enfercemen use d above that poin:t Chief Prinz nqtgo th at he had not been im-
.
"it
yolved in prev,i -n this case is the backing'of vehi�
9.us speed limit de termina tions . H.is concern, i
cles into tt,41. fic on 4 Itre'ei tlh�t'is a vieye,overlock'. He ogreed at there is A
tq 4 cq�nmcnt th
'iso -tiongo
rn qj qa�pers between Sunset and Th i r-d Ave. a I so. Councilmember the
Proble 11 a . men.
E0KONRS CITY COUNCI� plINUTES,
Page .6 August 6, 1 985
4'
'.EDMONDSj
T
�k; !9
;,,AGENDk
z
11Tn
item,;ntun
u k o r Actio
rig na loc. n:,`,,X�'For,--;In orm
7�N
�ARIOG OTAPPEAL, OP, !RARIN6,:ZXAMTNE'P �'DECISION
e, I trz
':ALtOW ADDITIONS�-TO�PENTHOUSE�,AT;,-'55
VARIANCE*'-*,T6,
'DEAN'ECHEL'*
$T.'_.1' (APPELL-EiIT BAR(;`ER/V- 14: 9'
bept.%/Indiv -/;1n1,,tTa,1s,
Clearance
minutes,
AGENDA,TIME:',40
'4Z Iv
ADMIN.:3VdS/FINANCE
AGENDA u gu s t
6, 1985 CITY' ATTORNEY"%.
CITY CLERA.
7XHIBITS ATTACHED: COM�4UNITY SERVICES, A4
ENGINEERING'
I.,-App'e er
al :Lett PARKS if �E
PLANNING..;-��,
H --E'aminer Repprt PUBLIC�`WnKS
earing' x
FIRE
'3.� eatring.Exam'iner Zxhibit. PFRSO�7NEL
POLICL
COMMITTEE
MAYOR
COMMENTS�:
_'4
'AMOUNT
EXPENDITURE A*PP1OP'RIA'M5N_.,,j
REQUIRED:'. $,0 BUDGET9D: -0 REQUIR.ED-:
HISTORY/5UMMARY STATEM.�NT:
-a
ner held a public
e he
On -June 2-;' 985, th. Hearing Exami aring.Qii
-ice reguest.,filed by,�'Dean Echplbarger to allo,.�'Rddit'iofts to the
�.variaT
�en'thouse at,555 Alder Street.
The all
S ecific requests nvolv.pd .. S
-i owing an addition,to �the west ide
f , tha., penthouse* and a greenhouse 6n'the west side of:the: eleva:tor
..penthouse. Because 'the bui-loing 'is non(7Qnfc)i;ming as to height, 'the,
file for -a, height variance.
'Appe'llaht'had�,t6
-�inq on on July 1985, �Lenyin
The 'ii4a. xamiTier i!,ssued his. decisi
the variance request. Subsequently, the Appellent filed an appeal
on July 16, 1985 seeking to overturn the Hearing Examiner decision..,'.
RZCOMMENDZD ACTION:
Adopt the Hearinq Examiner recormendation.
APPROVED CA_r'� (PU0CA L
66V
, f..j
T.
'I S,
-F, YOU.. W I SH JO '�FOLLOWING;IJTEM
P L E A S E SPEAK ON..THE,.,
BELOW I
CIT
N,
PEAU- OF, EXAM I NE R,.�.DEC
'�'.��EAHNGdi.O-A 1SIOWTOIDEN W
VARTAkE A D I:r 0 Y�.AT�555 ACIDERIST
0 LLbW,' D HOW
DEAN. ECHEL'BA ER/V-�14-05)'
RG
(APPELCANT
t
:ADDRESS
A4-bE
w
. 71
Z
ot� woo tKp T
m
- - 7- - 5,7� � "�IT
W
N,
7.)
E-, t)
0 F-`-^�-
o
I C�,o�
N'
".4*.. B.L
. . . . . . . . . . .
."HEARlNGi';EXAMliNE'(
T H E__�-
WILLA'HO'LD`WPL%l-1
E IN
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
H U RSDAY' :,JIJNr ',85
-THE'FOLLOWIN "Op I - I'
0 N
-f V—' -8c:
14;
VARIANCE TO ALLOW-AW,ADDITION OF -GREENHOUSE TO PENTHOUSL.j Eic
�.EFDINGI,��'
,6-J PERM ITTED. 30',,HEIGHT (CURRENT BUILDING HEIGHT 40
,;-�i-','�l',-'PRb,P�:E"R'TY'ADDRESS'AND LOCATION' 555.ALDER STREET
1AA"
N,
""""'ZON �"DISTRIQT_'. I
LASING"', WILL lEGIN AT —
THE H 7:30 P; M., IN THE PLAZA MEET ING� ROOM,�, LlbRARY
"bbl�D NO -650'MAIN STREET,, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, IF YOU WISH To CO�MENT 0, " AIS`,PAoPbSA
NTI
Y.Ou..MAY�_CQME T0zTHE-.HtA!RING AND SPEAK. YOU MAYALSO WRITE A L.ErrER.,SITAT'ING-YOOFi-,Vl�W�,,!!'-, l ,
"-�-""t"WHICH�WIL-L,��.-BE.CONSIDEFqED AT THE HEARING A RESS THE LE'nlR,TQ-jHE;,,FL�
PLE SE ADD 4 N N I NG
V
DEPA RTM ENT AND INCLUPE'THE AP 'E FILE NUMBER.
n�
'j,
IFTHE-.ITEk�A$-CbNTINUED TO ANOTHER' HF.ARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS. NOT COMPLETED',"OR
"."'PbAfHER.INFORMATION IS NEEDED, 'THE DATE OFTHE CONTINUED HEARINGWILL BEANNOUNCEDO
KY
;;,:'-AT THE. MEETING:-
p4
v
ADDITIONA�, INFORMATION MAY.BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 250 FIFTH A V E N U Ei`e� t,"
(PHONE 771-3
202, EXTENSION 252).
o.4
THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCT N'OR
CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE
-NG! THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE'
N'l
0
BY FINE -AND IMPRISONMENT.
T H I L(3. -OTICE-MAY BE REMOVED AFTER,-- 85
JUNE, 20,,-:19
7'*
'V
Nyi, yi.
`6, .4111
rv,�ol m
June 1, 2008
To: Edmonds Building Department
Re: Drainage Calculations for:
Mariner Condominiums, Building A
533 Alder St., Edmonds, WA, 98020
Building Enclosure Repairs
To whom it concerns:
This document contains roof drainage calculations for the building A roof
area. These calculations were established using appendix A-7 of SMACNA
(Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association, Inc.,
Fifth edition.
These calculations determine the required length for the scupper(s) in the
described location.
A rainfall intensity of 5 minutes exceeding only once in 100 years was
determined from Table 1-2, column B for the Seattle, Washington area.
IPH (Rainfall Intensity) - 3.3 inches per hour
H (head of water) - 1
Constant - .0 104
SF - Drained roof area in square feet
GPM (GALLONS PER MINUTE) = (.0104) IPH x SF
Calculations are as follows:
Low -slope roof area: '
Four drainage areas (2 scuppers and 2 roof drains with overflows)
Two equally sized drainage areas for roof drains (provided with overflow
scuppers per the drawings sitting 2" higher that the finished roofing surface).
2304 / 2 = 1152 sq. ft. for two roof drainage areas at the west elevation.
2514 / 2 = 1257 sq. ft. for two roof drainage areas at the east elevation.
One-half of roof area in square feet to be drained at west elevation -
1152 sq. ft.
SF = 1152
O*ne (1) sq. in. of downspout area will drain 360 sq. ft. of roof area.
1152/360 = 3.2 sq. in.
A downspout with a minimum area of 3.2 sq. in. is required.
SOLTNER GROUP
architects
REEcIEIVED
JON 3 2P.,3
OW
BUILDING DEPT.
V
Er
0
3
0
PQ
0
P
CA
:,4
OD
OD
V
X
N)
0
9)
Cn
0
co
CZ
co
0
5
CD
a
C
7
0
0
3
STREET FILE
0
Therefore from table 1-3 it is determined that a minimum 3" diameter
downspout is required.
The diameter of the roof drain will be a standard 4" drain with strainer
integrated into the roofing system with a clamping -type ring.
GPM = (.0 104) (1152) (3.3) = 39.53
Four (4) inch roof drains will be used at these locations with 4" rainwater
leaders to replace the existing leaders running through storage closet areas
at the west elevation. These new rainwater leaders will be run through the
joist spaces in the newly constructed parapet.
Two equally sized drainage areas for roof scuppers at the east elevations as
shown at locations on the roof plan.
2514 / 2 = 1257 sq. ft. for two roof drainage areas at the east elevation.
Total square feet of roof - 1257 sq. ft.
SF = 1257
GPM = (.0 104) (1257) (3.3) = 43.14
Per table A7-1, a scupper with a width of 10" is capable of draining up to 53.4
GPM. An 18" scupper will be used with a 3" downspout at both west ends of
the structure.
RE3
p,,4049
rH R. 90UNER
OF WASHINGTON
0 0
"POILZ�'(A--n Cwuai-v�
June 1, 2008
To: Edmonds Building Department
Re: Mariner Condominiums, Building A
533 Alder St., Edmonds, WA, 98020
Building Enclosure Repairs
To whom it concerns,
The undersigned has provided building enclosure documents for the specific
aspects of this project that in my professional judgment are appropriate to
satisfy the requirements of RCW 64.55.005 through 64.55.090.
��IiTEW
OF WASHINGTON
SOLTNER GROUP
architects
nEcoVED
JTA - 3 2000
BUILDING DEPT.
STIR"EET FILE
0
0
9)
Cn
4
N)
00
00
.,4
0
FS
CD
C
'P
0
0
3
fV, L'� f4
June 1,2008
To: Edmonds Building Department
SOLTNER GROUP
architects
Re: Mariner Condominiums, Building B
555 Alder St., Edmonds, WA, 98020
0
Building Enclosure Repairs
To whom it concerns,
co
co
The undersigned has provided building enclosure documents for
the specific
aspects of this project that in my professional judgment are appropriate to
0
satisfy the requirements of RCW 64.55.005 through 64.55.090.
0
CL
co
z
0
4"9
R TERED
R CT
CD
)>
ER
C/)
CD
STATE OF WASHINGTON
T
0
G)
RE(D
0
3 IT
'P
BUILDING DEP"
0
0
3
A
4L
June 1, 2008
To: Edmonds Building Department
Re: Drainage Calculations for:
Mariner Condominiums, Building B
555 Alder St., Edmonds, WA, 98020
Building Enclosure Repairs
SOLTNER GROUP
architects
To whom it concerns:
This document contains roof drainage calculations for the building B roof
areas. These calculations were established using appendix A-7 of SMACNA
(Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association, Inc.,
Fifth edition.
These calculations determine the required length for the scupper(s) in the
described location.
A rainfall intensity of 5 minutes exceeding only once in 100 years was
determined from Table 1-2, column B for the Seattle, Washington area.
IPH (Rainfall Intensity) - 3.3 inches per hour
H (head of water) - I
Constant - .0 104
SF - Drained roof area in square feet
GPM (GALLONS PER MINUTE) = (.0104) IPH x SF
Calculations are as follows:
Bufferfly roof atop penthouse area:
Total square feet of roof - 1,575 sq. ft.
.5 (1575) = 788 (2 scuppers equally dividing roof drainage area)
SF = 788
GPM = (.0 104) (788) (3.3) = 27.04
CD
6
a
C
7
0
0
3
Per table A7-1, a scupper with a width of 10" is capable of draining up to 29.3
GPM. A 10" scupper will be used with a 3" downspout at both ends of the
butterfly roof.
RECEIVED
JUN - 3 200.3
BUILDING DEPT.
STREET FILE
';� - I Z 0 0
Stairtower and elevator penthouse roofs at the southwest corner:
Total square feet of roof - - 106 sq. ft.
Only one scupper will be calculated for the full load. The smaller roof drains
onto the slightly larger one below (stair penthouse). This scupper size will be
calculated. The roof above will utilize the same size scupper and downspout.
GPM = (.0104)(106)(3.3) = 3.64
Per table A7-1, a scupper with a width of 4" is capable of draining up to 11.0
GPM. A 4" scupper will be used with a 3" downspout at both scupper
locations in this area.
Stairtower penthouse at the northeast corner:
Total square feet of roof - - 116 sq. ft.
Only one scupper will be required to drain this small roof area.
G P M = (.0 104) (116) (3.3) = 3.9 8
Per table A7-1, a scupper with a width of 4" is capable of draining up to 11.0
GPM. A 4" scupper will be used with a 3" downspout at this scupper location.
Roof deck area at penthouse:
The roof will be drained at the north and south ends of the structure into
sumps as shown on the roof plan and elevations.
The roof drainage area is divided slightly unequally, with the south side having
more drainage area. The calculation will be done for the south side, and
scupper sized equally at the north side.
South side drainage area (SF) - 1368 sq. ft.
GPM = (.0 104) (1368) (3.3) = 46.9
Per table A7-1, a scupper with a width of 18" is capable of draining up to 53.4
GPM. An 18" scupper will be used with a 5" downspout at these locations on
the north and south of the roof deck.
4049 WR ,,'ISTERED
TO RICILVIER
TE OF VVASHINGTO�
.-Citv.,of.E�onco,
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT
Permit Number.
LWWssue Date:
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: Beh ind 5 Alder St.
/1? B. Type'of Work (be specific): B ury' 375'T"6'k 1 1 co riduit . to under round
the 2nd, 3rd', and 4th sgan of CATV cable
west ot 6th Ave 5 between Alder & maple
C. Contractor: Chambers /Northsky Contact: Tom Anderson
Mailing Address: 1C)o W naytan st Phone: 7751--7504
State License #: NogTHSC107JG Liability insurance: Bond: $
D. Building Permit # (if applicable):
E. Commercial E] Subdivision
E] Multi-Fanuily E] Single Family
INSPECTOR:
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
FI
I City Project Utility.(PUD, GTE,
Other
INSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: D Yes. XFK] No G. Size of Cut: 0 x
APPLICANT TO READ(-,�N6SIGN
WN%Z21!.,.'W
.;ATER)
H. Chargq_$
INDEMNITY.- Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfrom injuries, damages, or claims-ofany.
kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its deparfinents or
employees, i I ncluding or not,,Iimited to the d?fense of any legal proWedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND A'iIATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF, ONETEAR,,�:QLL6wiNG THE FINAL INSPEC-
TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED
BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT
Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application.
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220.
Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion..
Restoration is to. be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean, at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as� required. by the City Engineer.
All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end'of theworking day;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statements and understand thepermit requirements and the pink coff'of the p*ermit will be
available oSPftr-
pt all. time§,fo? inspection purposes.
Signature:
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY:
TIME AUTHORIZED: YOFD AFTER I -)—D DAYS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS-m oL— A
L2, F
14
RIGHT OF WAY FEE: �:L7(' oo
DISRUPTION FEE/FUND I It:
RESTORATION FEE:
T OTAL FEE:
RECEIPT NO.:
ISSUED BY:
pmr
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN, PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. I Di� 1997