618 GLEN ST.PDFIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11421
618 GLEN ST
ADDRESS: �Z& 27-
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: o0,3q!5 t I 0.�� msoo
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
CRITICAL AREAS :— bb—A01 — DETERMINATION: El Conditional Waiver n Study Required �.Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: Ab-5
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: (1010
PARKING AGREEMENTS DA
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED- (SAIWAMIU10
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
,Nil
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
I I vil/I Ab
GEOTECH REPORT DATED: I—V
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
L\TEMP\DSrs\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc
OV E 04f
un
V CITY OF EDMONDS
121 ST 11 AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
STATUS: ISSUED 7/2/2007
Expiration Date: 7/2/2008
Parcel No-. 00395710200500
APPLICANT CONTRACTOR
MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC
7907 212TH ST SW STE 102 7907 212T H ST SW STE 102 7907 212TH ST SW STE 102
DWIGHT MCGREW
EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026
4 2 5 -7 76 - 2 2 11 425-776-2211 425-776-2211
LICENSE #: MICHEC1061 D5 EXPA/19/2008
4 UNIT CONDOMINIUM: GARAGE 2202SF,LOBBY/STAIRWELL ON LOWER LEVEL 582SF. I ST FLOOR 2617SF, COMMON 183
SF, DECK 168 SF. 2ND FLOOR 2716 SF, DECK 168 SF.
VALUATION: $578,194
PER -MIT TYPE: Commercial
PERMIT GROUP: 6 - Apart ment/Con do New
GRADING: Y CYDS: 284
T YP E OF CONST RUCT ION: VB
RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: N
OCCUPANT GROUP: R2/U
OCCUPANT LOAD: 26
FENCE: N ( 0 X 0 FT.)
CODE: 2003
OTHER: N ------- OTHER DESC:
IZO E: RM-1.5
INUMBER OF STORIES: 3
VESTED DATE:
INUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 4
F-XISTING ARFA
IBASEMENT: 0 1 ST FLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR: 0
PIROPOSEDARI-A
��o I ST FLOOR: 582 2ND FLOOR- 2800
13RD FLOOW 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0
13RD FLOOR� 2716 GARAGE: 2202 DECK: 336 OTHEW 0
FRONTSUBACK SIDEsErBACK REARSErBACK
(FQUIRED NO-RTH-15 PROPOSED: 18 IREQUIRED: EAST 10 PROPOSED: 10 IREQUIRED: SOUTH 15 PROPOSED: 18
-IEIGHT ALLOWED:30 PROPOSED:29.42 IREQUIRED: WEST 10 PROPOSED: 10
;ET BACK NOTES:
I AGPLEETOCOMPLY WITHCITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOINGTHE WORK AUTHORIZED
THEREBY, NO PERSONWILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OFTHE LABORCODE OFTHE STATE OFWASHINGTON RELATINGTO
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18�27.
TH[rA'VPkww6qsNOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BYTHE B�ILP�NG OFFICIAL OR HIS(HER DEPUTY AND ALL FEESARE rAID.
A 7
Name Date
F.1 m I WK N 11M
By
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCIU RE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL ORA CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED, UBC109/ IBC I i01IRC 110.
ARCHIVE APPLICANT ASSESSOR OTHER
11", r, 0 4
STATUS: ISSUED BLD20060955
CONDITIONS
0 Landscape Sprinkler System being installed, must have proper backflow pervention assembly tested and sent to Public Works
REQUIRED SPECIAL NSPECTIONS FOR THIS PROJECT:
1) Excavation, grading, site preparation, & temporary shoring
2) Soil bearing verification
3) Placement of fill & compaction
4) Retaining Wall/Rockery/Keys tone Wall Construction
5) Footing drain
6) Temporary and Final Erosion Control
7) Final letter fi-om geotechn ical engineer of record
Seperate Permit Required For:
1) Plumbing
2) Mechanical
3) Fire Connection
4) Fire Sprinkler (NFPA-13R)
5) Fire A farm
6) Right of Way
7) Side Sewer
8) Water Meter
9) Listed and Tested Fire Stopping Assemblies
10) Signs
11) Emergency Guide (Fire Marshal)
12) State Electrical
13) State Elevator
14) Maintenance Bonds
15) Building Enclosure Certification Letter from Building Enclosure Inspector per RCW 64.55
The building enclosure must be inspected by a quaffied inspector in accordance with RCW 64.55.30, 64.55.040, and 64.55.050,
and a building enclosure certification letter from the inspector must be submitted to the Building Division prior to final
inspection by the City Building Inspector.
Subject to the conditions of ADB-2006-0028.
All new, extended, re -built or relocated electrical utility and/or service shall be placed underground.
Special inspections have been called for on this project and are noted on the approved construction plans and building permit.
It is the owner and/or contractors responsibility to assure that reports are provided to the City on a weekly basis. Be advised —
if special inspection reports are not forthcoming, the Budding Official may issue a "Stop Work" and no City inspections will be
provided until such time as the reporting agency has complied and reports are reviewed and approved by the City.
Final approval on a project or final occupancy approval must be granted by the Building Official prior to use or occupancy of
the building or structure. Check the job card for all required City inspections including final project approval and final
occupancy inspections.
Any request forthe modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") must be specifically called
out and identified. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with City code and for which a
variance has not been specifically identified, request and considered by the appropriate City official in accordance with the
appropriate provision of City code or State law does not approve any items not to code specification.
SoundfNoise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt fromthe noise limits
of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00amto 6:00pm on weekdays and 10:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding
Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activites must comply with the
noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to EOC 5.30.120.
I INSPECTIONS
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO 13E DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE
PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION.
PERMIT T1ME LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)
F-
BUELDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 ENGWEERING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 FIRE (425) 771-0215 __j
PUBLIC WORKS (425) 771-0235 PRFTRFATMENT(425) 72-5755 RECYCLING (425) 275-4801
When calling for an inspection please lea-vt the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being
reauested, Contact Name and Phone Number, Date Prefereed, and whether you prefer morning or afternoon.
E-Pre-Con
E-Erosion Control/Mobilization
E-Traffic Control
E-StormTightline
E,Storrn Detention System
E-Footing Drain Connection
F,Footing Drywell
E-Sewer LaterallMain Inspection
E-Sewer Lateral/Main Pressure Test
FWater Main Connection
E-Water Service Purity, >2"
EWater Service Line
E-Double Check Detector Assem Vault
E-Trash Enclosure
E-Engineering Final
B-Setbacks
B-Footings
B-Foundation Wall
B-Isolated Footings/Piers
B-Retaining Wall
B-Slab Insulation
B-Plumb Ground Work
B-First Floor Frarning
B-Plumb Rough In
B-Gas Test/Pipe
B-Equipment-Mech
B-Exterior Sheath in g
B-Shear Nailing
B-Height Verification
B-Framing
B-Wall Insulation/Caulk
B-Floor Insulation/Cauik
B-Ceiling Insulation/Caulk
B-Sheetrock Nail
B-Building Final
F-Extinguishers
F-Fire Dept Inspection
F-Addressing Visibility
F-Fire Final
P-Planning Final
Dennis M. Bruce, RE.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer
RECER177
July 17, 2006 AUG 16 20-26
Aft man r. BUILDING DEPARTMENT
b I nEET FILE ciTY OF EDMONDS
City of Edmonds
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
7907 212" St. SW, #102
Edmonds, WA 98026
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation - Foundation Recommendations
Pro osed 4-Unit Michel Construction Project
Glen, Edmonds, Washington
This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the
Michel Construction property at 618 Glen, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was
required due to owner / developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements.
REFERENCES:
• Project Plans by Michel Construction
• Photographs by D. Bruce, P.E.
BACKGROUND:
The overall property at 618 Glen St. is rectangular in shape with approximately
60 feet of frontage on Glen St. and approximately 11 0-foot depth to the rear paved
alleyway (see Survey Site Plan).
The overall property is moderately sloped with approximately 4 foot of elevation
difference from the rear (alleyway) down to the front (Glen St.).
Visual evaluation of the property reveals no evidence of any geotechnical
distress: no slides, no soil tension cracks or any evidence of erosional degradation.
Currently, a single-family residence Jthat is to be removed) occupies the
property. The existing residence reveals�;ho evidence of any foundation settlements,
cracking or geotechnical distress.
It is understood that Michel Construction proposes to demolish the existing
residence and construct a 4-unit project (see Project Plans).
SOILS * FOUNDATIONS e SITE DEVELOPMENT e INSPECTION - DRAINAGE e DESIGN& PERMIT e LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, WA 98155 - (206) 54.6-9217 - FAX (206) 546-8442
1. .. I 1 0 0
City of Edmonds
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 2
This engineer is very familiar with the soil conditions in the area having done a
geotechnical investigation and on -site inspections for the nearby Michel construction
project at 658 Glen St. and 628 Glen St. Ongoing geotechnical inspections for 628
Glen St. have verified the extremely dense, stable, underlying sands.
EVALUATION:
In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, this engineer dug
3 soil test holes by hand in the vicinity of the proposed 4-unit found * ations. All 3 test
holes revealed similar sub -grade conditions and were consistent with the known sub -
grade soils in the vicinity, namely:
0" to 6" Lawn, organics, roots, and organic silt
6" to 38" (boftorn of test holes) Dense sands
No water was encountered in any of the 3 test holes. All test hole walls remained
vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred.
CONCLUSIONS I RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in
the area, the property at 618 Glen St., Edmonds, Washington is geotechnically
approved for the proposed 4-unit project, subject to the following:
• Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing
. pressure: 2,000 p.s.f.
• Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall
design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer.
• For soil cuts greater than 4 feet in depth use temporary shoring consisting of
Eco-Blocks, subject to on -site geotechnical inspections.
• For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350
p.c.f.
• Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete
placement.
The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and
spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above
native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for
9
City of Edmonds
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 3
structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual
spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24)
inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the
lower adjacent finish ground surface.
Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below
footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over
excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide
as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For
example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide
footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. -
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed
for an allowable soil bearing pressure of two thousand (2,000) pounds per square foot
(p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when
considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is
anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent,
native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half
inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch.
NOTE: The bearing capacity of 3,000 p.s.f. applies to over -excavated and
backfill conditions. Footings placed on native soils may be designed for 2,000 p.s.f.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between
the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the
vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations
must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the
outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following
design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading:
Parameter
Coefficient of Friction
Passive Earth Pressure
Where:
Desi.qn Value
0.55
350 p.c.f.
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot.
(2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density.
We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the
foundation's resistance to lateral loading.
City of Edmonds 0
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 4
------------ -- - --- ----------
SLABS-ON-GRADE:
Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or
on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils
can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath
the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We
also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the
slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes.
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS:
Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral
earth pressures imposed by the. soils retained by these structures. The following
recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height,
which restrain level backfill:
Parameter
Active Earth Pressure*
Passive Earth Pressure
Coefficient of Friction
Soil Unit Weight
Where:
Design Value
35 p.c.f.
350 p.c.f.
0.55
125 p.c.f.
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot
(2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid
densities.
For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall
height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be
added to the active equivalent fluid pressure).
The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and
retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the
walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding.
The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures
behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the
walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above
lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfillis desired behind the walls, then we will need
C ity of Edmonds 0
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 5
to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the
appropriate design earth pressures.
Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and
foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are
designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement
and compaction of retaining wall backfili should be accomplished with hand -operated
equipment.
Retaining Wall Backfill
Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls
should be free -draining -structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain
no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than
four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should
be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their. high silt content, if
the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and
Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites
should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these
backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not
exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The
subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations
regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation
walls.
EXC"ATION AND SLOPES:
At the time of this report, this engineer anticipates footing and foundation
excavations to vary from 2 feet to 7 feet below grade. For excavations greater than 4
feet, temporary shoring using Ecology -Blocks is geotechnically recommended.
In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local,
state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of
four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a
height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1
(Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under
specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be
modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no
steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:1V. It is important to note that
sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware
of this potential hazard.
City of Edmonds 0
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 6
Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary
or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an
appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial
layer of soil.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS:
Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls.
These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed
rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar
material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as
the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface
water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system.
No groundwater was observed in any of the 3 shallow test holes during the
fieldwork. Excavation depths up to 7 feet should not encounter significant groundwater
or seepage. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation
occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site
by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps
interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation.
The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off
the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any
area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed
slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas
adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building,
except where the area adjacent to the building is paved.
GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL:
The proposed building and paveme ' nt areas should be stripped and cleared of all
surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or
removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill.
Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent
retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils Peeds to
support loads. This engineer should observe siteponditions during and after excavation
prior to placement of any structural fill.
All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or
near the optimum moisture content. The optimum, moisture content is that moisture
content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill
City of Edmonds 0
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 7.
soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction
process.
I The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction
equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the
lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents
recommended relative compaction for structural fill:
Location of Fill Placement
Beneath footings, slabs or walkways
Behind retaining walls
Beneath pavements
Minimum Relative
Compaction
95%
90%
95% for upper 12 inches of
Sub -grade, 90% below that level
Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of
the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in
accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1 557-78 (Modified Proctor).
Use of On -Site Soils
if grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy, on -site.
soils are very wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains
and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and
thus are not highly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the
moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content.
Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and
19 pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than
the optimum moisture content.
Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a
granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage
of particles passing the.No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil
passing the three -quarter -inch sieve.
The use of the on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper
organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering
inspection.
City of Edmonds 0
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 8
DRAINAGE CONTROLS - INFILTRATION:
No drainage problems were evident with the existing residence and property at
618 Glen St. The sandy sub -grade soils allow for excellent infiltration, which may be
utilized for this project, if desired.
In the alternative, storm water tight lines shall be connected to the existing City of
Edmonds drainage system.
CONCRETE:
All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.)
shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix.
TEMPORARY SHORING — ALLEYWAY SUPPORT:
As stated, this engineer anticipates a maximum soil cut up to 7 feet in depth.
Soil cuts greater than 4 feet shall utilize Eco-Block shoring to provide slope cut
stability.
Additionally, the rear alleyway shall be stabilized by use of Eco-Blocks as
determined by on -site geotechnical inspections.
The base Eco-Block shall be embedded in dense sub -grade soils as verified by
this engineer. Eco-Block batter shall comply with 1 H:6V (see attached typical design).
INSPECTIONS:
The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical
aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction:
• Soil cuts
• Foundation sub -grade verification
• Temporary Eco-Block shoring
• And retaining wall, or rockery placement
• Any fill placement
• Subsurface drainage installation
• Temporary and final erosion control
City of Edmonds
c/o Michel Construction, Inc.
July 17, 2006
Page 9
SUMMARY:
The proposed 4-unit project at 618 Glen St., Edmonds, Washington is
geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations
herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key
geotechnical inspections during construction.
GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF FINAL PLANS:
At the time of this investigation and report (July 17, 2006), final project plans
were not available for review.
As stated in this report, the dense sub -grade sands allow for conventional
reinforced footings. This engineer anticipates the maximum depth of soil cut will be 7
feet with use of temporary shoring (Eco-Blocks) as discussed herein.
Prior to final permit issuance, this engineer should review the final project plans
to verify compliance with the recommendations of this report.
Upon satisfactory review, a "Statement of Minimal Risk" will be issued.
CLOSURE:
The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other
warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results
of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored
locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different
than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the
situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations.
EM
I - f there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
JEXPIRES-1�/7c�o - 'q I .
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
Geotechnical / Civil Engineer
ppm�
WM; 17
-5-6
77!-T-qTUTq—,g "4, 4,K".
I an",
gO,
Kali
34:
N7
j i
z xm,�
4"'t
'lot
ON,
Wi
- - - - - - - - - - --
GLEN STIOET
_w m___w
__.._w ___._w --- ..--w
L 9
NEW CI3 #3 TYPE Ll 2'�WATEPLINE &
KIM 75.79 SPRINKLER
7560'
�NVK
_v
E.C.
11
METER I'N�
F
r
lwM
NEW CI5
N TYPE Ll
u, m�.
C)
KIM 80..
51
C13 #2 TYPE� I
�INVFOU
7025'
POCKE?,,'
m*nNo tr PN4
C4
> <
A
imAx 3, RocrERY
i
55 -
EX5rING HOUSE I
TC 13E REMOVED b
E511ZCH
TP13 REMOVED
MAX 3'F',OGK.EPY I
AVE. GRADE
.-A- -7?..58'
B. 79.68'
C. 81.28'
D, 80,96'
/4 = 80.38'
MAX HEIGHT = 110.375'
ACTUAL HEIGHT = 109.78'
FOOTING = 77.38'
SLAB = 79.38'
1 ST FL = 88.38'
2ND Fl, = 98.38'
IMPERVIOUS AREA
BUILDING. 2,800 SQ. FT
DRIVE%'VAY-1,34794 SQ FT
PATIO. 494.13 SQ. FF.
TOTAL 042.07 SQ FT
GRADING CALCS
M —D- 80.42'"E.-79.38' FINISH 1.04'
I.D4'X 2,784.00 SQ. Fr. (BLD FOOIF PRINT)
2,895 36 CU FF / 27 = 107 24 YD. CUT
DRIVE-- 81.25'(AVE) - 79.38'FINISH = 1.87'
I. 87'X 603.99 SQ. Fr.(BACK DRWEWAY)
1,129 46 CU Fr./27 = 41.83 YD. CUT
CUT TOTAL = 149.07 YDS. CUT
YARD 1:
1.87' (AVE) X 603.99 SQ. FL
1129.46.CU.FF./27 = 41.83 YD. FILL
YARD 2.,
2.16' (AVE) X 228.60 SQ. Fr.
493.78 CU.Fr. / 27 = 18.29 YD. FILL
YARD 3:
2.1'(AVE) X 1071.24 SQ. FF.
2249 60 CU.FT / 27 = 83.32 YD FILL
DATUM FT: EX15nNG STORM MH IN THE
INTERSECTION OF 6TH AVE N AND GLEN 5T
RE 77 47, IE 74 90
SITE BENCH MARr, WATER METER IN
BUILDING 79.35
EXISTING GRADE ----------
PROPOSED GRADE
INDMDUAL TRASH CONTAINERS IN
MVATE GARAGE = INDIVIDUAL SERVICE
ALL NEW, EXrENDED, RE-13UILT OR RELOCATED
ELECTRICAL UTILITY AND/OR SERVICE SHALL
15E PLACED UNDERGROUND.
LOT LINE5 & 5ET13ACr, STAKES MUST'
BE IN PLACE AT TIME OF FOUNDAT10N
INSPECTION.
>
<
> <
FOP LOWEST FLOOR OF 13UILPING TO
Ul
MEET THE DEFINMON OF A 13A5EMENT,
KEYSTONE WALLS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED
I N
b 900-
TO BUILD UP THE GRADE ON THE EAST &
WEST SIDES OF THE 13UILDING MAINTAINED
AT LEAST 6-0" FROM THE BUILDING EXT WALL.
b
-,D-R-A-INAGE
0' OVERLAY ALLEY FROM PROPERTY LINE&
N
60.
:LEAN OUT 00
TO PROPERTYLINE A5 NEEDED
PLOT PLAN
+ 1%
PRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PRIVEWAY CENTERLINE
PROFILE (NORTH PRIVE) PROFILE (50UTH PRIVE)
MiCROALM iw- k
ennis M. Bruce, P.P. rel:5 ts-i �L0017
M.S.C.E., M.B.Al. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer
UF th $A 0
0
-P
-W -
Ce--T
REPIOPCT
Ao?,k-ovEF6 tVWP-5C,"Tl0$J
WC4FLL XJ 4T.
Y-E-8 2 3 2007
STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK:
The plans and specifications'for the MtClAeL 60404T. kk 0 L:T L - UIJ tr
PP-O:T - e Cp 11? 6 Le -A) S-r.have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the
recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and
recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and "
verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction m6ll be stabilized and remain
stable and willnot increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk -of damage to
the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil
I be minimal.
—a
iCAL lkswc-rfo�J-5
'41P 'a --e (�
As lEaClkF�'
W
STREET FILE.
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DES16N & PERMIT. - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline. Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442
0 #P20
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
1. Site Address/ Location: 's-7— V 6�D
2. Property Tax A . ccount Number: 7102 006 DO -
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): j6660
4. Is this site currently developed?,Z_ yes; no.
If yes; how.is site developed?
CA File No: Oro - 19
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hifly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: _; Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow ;shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: A10
For City Staff Use Only MAO 4 2
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable?
2. Site is Zoned? 911/14 - 1. S'
3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? PC—baellu
4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on Site?
5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?
DETERMINATION
5;,STUDY,REQUIRED WAIVER
Reviewed bv; Date: 0 /Q 5(/cc
Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.25.2004
OV. ED4 0 #P20
City of Edmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
toc. I%ol) Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application for the City- of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or
may be, present on the subject property. The informaiion
needed to complete the Checklist should be easily
,available from observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil
surveys).
xf am
Ru 11 1), 20M
-3 t ,
Date Received: 'AA�3
City Receipt #:- !J
Critical Areas File M -VO04 —00
Critical Areas Checklist Fee* $135.00
Date Maile . d to Applicant: 7/,2006
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist, ma�e a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent
information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
The undersigned applicant, and h' t;qw QW R - -
AN assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend anrhold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable
attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are'true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANVAGENT
DATE
Property Owner's Authorization
By my signature, I cert , ify that 11 have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to $his
RMN ATI IR F. OF OWNER DATE Y 0
�JLF-AbL PKINJ L;LI=Ah
Owner/Applicant:
Alhcl%�-,4- dolVJ7-1--ZIC�7W Z-e-
Name
7
Street Address
4g;-
City State Zip
Telephon e: 7
Email address (optional):
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone:
Email Address (optional):
V
APPLICATION
for
The City of Edmonds SEDE SEWER PERN[IT EASEMENT No . ..........................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION E) REPAIRS 0
114-07300
Ov,,NER ........... j�gr.i-s ..... C ........ A-l.a-n i -z ................................................... CONTRACTOR ...............................................................
.. ... .. .. ...... .. ................................... PERMIT No . ......................
ADDRESS ....... �.1.8 .... Glen .... S.t ................................................................. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BL0CK No . ......................................
.. .. ... .. .. ...
9 1 ;- 1 1-1
'0
NAMEOF ADDITION.. .......................................................................................................................................
Dye Tested On Sewer 1972
Approved:
DATE................................................ By ......................................................................
it? of (1b onb
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
14'
,,.-'PER International Building Code Section I I 0\
At: 616
Occupancy established by this certificate: Dwelling Units: **4** No. Stories: 3
R2/U TypftZonstruction: VB Basement: No
Maximur '6ccupant Load
n
-*26.** (per IBC 1004)
Room''capacity sigqs,-whe—n're.'quii,ed,;mLi-st-remain posted at al�t'imes.
Owner of Building: Michel Construction — Owner Add iess:*7907�-21f7& SW; Suite, I 02oEdmonds, WA 98026
THE Michel 4-Unit Condo (cD- 616 Glen Strdettt— --INSW:-T P- VED'AS COMPLYING WTH THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE 2003 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY FOR THE GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY
AND THE USE FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANC I Y IS CLA 1 S SIF4ED
Issued this, 20 th 'Ma'Vr260
C IL N 0 FICIAL
BY:
This certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or obscured and allbernaintained a condition at all times. Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new
Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official.
A.
10
'0 SOWS A
MOM,
0 9�vmry vu
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
.. V. I C' ,
*PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE*
STATUS: ISSUED ENG20070149
SIDE SEWER PERMIT (2-M ulti-Family)
Permit Number: ENG20070149 Expiration Date: 12/14/2008
Job Address: 616 GLEN ST, EDMONDS
APPLICANT CONTRACTOR
MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC
7907 212TH ST SW STE 102 7907 212TH ST SW STE 102
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
LICENSE #: MICHEC1061 D5 EXP: 4/19/2010
JOB DESCRIPTION
• IREPAIR P Y PROPOSE TO RaJSE LATERAL UDNUMBER--
• CRINDER PUM N PROPOSE TO REUSE SIDE SEWER -
Sewer main in alley. 6" sanitary sewer lateral to property line with 6" cleanout and 6" s ide sewer to building. See conditions re: reuse
of e?dsting lateral.
EAS ENIENT INFORNIVI'lON
• P J CROSSES OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY
• VERIFICATION OF RECORDED EASEMENTS COMPLETE
IADEMAVTY- The Applicant has signed an application which states helshe holds the City ofEdmonds harmlessfrom injuries,
damages or claims ofany kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City ofEdmonds or
any ofits departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense ofany legal proceedings including defense costs and
attorneyfees by reason ofgranting thispermit.
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION
CALL FOR INSPECTION (425) 771-0220 EKT. 1326
24 HOUR NOTICEREQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS
THIS APPLICATION IS NOTA PERMTUNTIL SIGNED BY T14E CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPTIS ACKNOWLEDGED IN
SPACE PROVIDED.
A Wrinted: Tue9day. October 14. 20(
F-1 FILE COPY �! rINSP�ECTOR COPY F-] APPLICANT COPY
STATUS: ISSUED
ENG20070149
• Contact Public Works to have them tv e7dsting lateral for reuse. Ezdsting lateral to be capped at property line if it cannot be
reused and a new 6" lateral s hall then be installed. Sewer lateral to have 6" cleanout on the fight of way s ide at the property
line regardless.
• Refer to City of Edmonds Side Sewer Infon-nation handout for approved pipe materials, inspections and other requirements.
• A 6" cleanout with 12" locking cast iron lamphole cover is required at the property fine.
0 Maintain 19 separation between the sanitary side sewer and the water service line.
• E-Sewer Lateral Installation
• FSanitary Side Sewer Inspection
• E-Engineering Final
PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE. INITIAL: NOTES:
PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE: INITIAL: NOTES:
FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED DATE: INITIAL:
4..? C. 1 S () 11
0 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 * FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 8, 2007
Dwight McGrew
Michel Construction Inc.
7907 212'h St SW, #102
Edmonds, WA 98026
RE: Permit 01000609552, t6d'&Q& V&t -
Request to Exceed Driveway Slope of 14%
Dwight,
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
This letter is being sent in response to your request to exceed the maximum allowed
driveway slope of 14%, dated April 25, 2007 and to confirm for your records the
approval indicated in my e-mail dated June 22, 2007. After review of the submitted letter
and civil plans for the development it is understood that the request to exceed the 14%
driveway slope is only for a small portion of the driveway and specifically limited to the
area where it joins the existing alley.
Additional grading of the existing alley is not a preferred approach as the. alley not only
serves this development but also other existing properties. Re -grading could alter
drainage and access to other properties.
For these reasons, it is found reasonable to allow a maximum driveway slope up to 18%.
Please feel free to contact Jeanie McConnell at 425-771-0220, ext. 1338 should you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
dVBERT
D K. GE
CITY ENGINEER
Jm
c: Street file
Permit #bld2006O955
Incorporated August 11, 1890
HRL
0 S CTION9 INC.
April 205, 2007
David Gebert P.E.
City Engineer
City of Edmonds
12, 5th Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
0
RESUB
ArPR 25 2007
BUbW&9FM"'W'Cr
STREET FILE
Subject: Request for Waiver, Maximum Driveway slope of 1.47o per ECDC
RE: Plan Check # 2006-0955
Dear Mr.Gebert,
It is requested that a waiver is granted allowing the driveway to be ,
constructed using a 15.5% grade in lieu of the 14% maximum as required per
ECDC.
Reasons supporting the waiver are:
1. The. ave. grade 'of the driveway is 14%.
2. The 15.5% area comprises only 200 square feet of a 600 square foot
driveway.
3. We have looked at using the alley but an existing drain limits any
further grading.
Sincerely,
1 4eF)a�t
Dwig t cGrew
Michel Construction Inc.
425.776.2211
Dwight@michelproperties.com
7907 - 212TH SW, #102 - EDMONDS, WA 98026 * (425) 776-2211 e FAX (425) 778-9086 e #MICHEC106ID5
0
I
ie� 6&� "57,—
117 C . is) 11
July 5, 2007
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
MEMO TO:
Edmonds School District
Verizon Northwest
SNOCOM Police and Fire Dispatch
SNOPAC
Snohomish County E911
U.S. Post Office
Snohomish County Assessor's Office
Snohomish County Information Services
Snohomish County P-U-D.
Puget Sound Energy
Edmonds Fire Department
Edmonds Police Department
Edmonds Utility Billing
Edmonds Public Works
Edmonds Building/Street File
Edmonds Address Files
Lynnwood Disposal
Comcast Cable
Waste Management Northwest
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
Please be advised that the attached addresses have been added to the Edmonds address
system: Existing addresses of 618 Glen St has been demolished. New address for proposed 4
Unit Condo is 616 Glen St.
Permit number for new Bldg: BLD20060955, Proposed 4 Unit Condominium
Tax ID Number: 00395710200500
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or
Umbaugh@ci.edmonds.wa.us. Please contact me if you wish to be removed from this list.
IRIes; ctfully,
Theresa Umbaugh
Permit Coordinator
Edmonds Building Department
L\Temp\DST's\M aster Letters\New Address7/5/2007
Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
1432'
4_, 106 1429
1427
140.9 1428
1421
' P14 2
8
140, 1 _
1422
51 827
"Z
1-2
691
?40
735
all s'2, T 631
t
R
727
929
—__f�UGET WAY
723 814
906
PLX
r12121 M) 1333
1117 720 742 750
911 912 LU 122.1
710 725
1205 1329 1327
903 842 8, 6
F-
7211 w �D
751 Lut
939 836 832' 1
716
HINDLEY LANE
722
709 Z .0
751
731 741
809
MOOMERE
845
806 ;z
741
750 ZW BROO DR
Ir > 846
731 1025
730 1031 1030 11
W 1035 -
Cr
1021 .2 1020 1033
�4 1015 1 17 1019
715 0
—T-
209 TV 0
10, m 841
. .... . ...
10'1 743
CASPERS ST
300 314 324 342 350-' M6 >
(m 928
9
620 662 664 656 907 W9 12
616 633 623 — 908
632 621 625 62, 633 905 724 736 11' E91 4
630 860
615 Ik
630 632 634 825 738
623 4D 6l4 615 A, —
A,' . " .:. 11
824 726 828
611
606 613 611 615 730
619 817
607
815 825
7 L
602 60 610
616 813 w
7 al
Ed onds
'T, &U 54 2
$01 Methodist
all
522 541 548
550 ALUM WAY 630 728
SO" 721 721
5 0 5 hurch
612 62 1 1
529 z
Office w. 805 715
508 622 >
Sch— 807
667 770
510 619 621
627
816
504 502 615
Soundvi Apartments 617 814 6.47
426 60' 614 612
le 645
Holy Rosary 600 810
F a 603 School - 9.
6i�ble]
432
r GLEN ST S20 524 529-' 529
"0 P.,Wg
me e,
428
z
1 UA
410 503
U 50C� 622
65
3
65
771
DALEY ST
610
Oy
;b,
7, [=722 80
10 '. 18 C)"J
0 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH , EDMONDS, WA 98020 * (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
November 8, 2007
Dwight McGrew
Michel Construction Inc.
7907 212' St SW, #102
Edmonds, WA 98026
RE: Permit #bld2006O955, 616 Glen Street
Request to Exceed Driveway Slope of 14%
Dwight,
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
STREET FILE
This letter is being sent in response to your request to exceed the maximum allowed
driveway slope of 14%, dated April 25, 2007 and to confirm for your records the
approval indicated in my e-mail dated June 22, 2007. After review of the submitted letter
and civil plans for the development it is understood that the request to exceed the 14%
driveway slope is only for a small portion of the driveway and specifically limited to the
area where it joins the existing alley.
Additional grading of the existing alley is not a preferred approach as the alley not only
serves this development but also other existing properties. Re -grading could alter
drainage and access to other properties.
For these reasons, it is found reasonable to allow a maximum driveway slope up to 18%.
Please feel free to contact Jeanie McConnell at 425-771-0220, ext. 1338 should you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
DOKGEBERT
CITY ENGINEER
jm
c: Street file
Permit #bld2006O955
Incorporated August 11, 1890
HtL L
S CTION9 INC.
April 25,2007
David Gebert P.E.
City Engineer
City of Edmonds
1215,h Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
E
iUB
RES -1
&JbW&PF6
14
Subject: Request for Waiver, Maximum Driveway slope of 14% per ECDC
RE: Plan Check # 2006-0955
Dear Mr.Gebert,
It is requested that a waiver is granted allowing the driveway to be
constructed using a 15.5fo grade in lieu of the 14% maximum as required per
ECDC.
Reasons supporting the waiver are:
1. The ave. grade of the driveway is 14%.
2. The 15.5% area comprises only 200 square feet of a 600 square foot
driveway.
3. We have looked at using the alley but an existing drain limits any
further grading.
Sincerely,
Dwig t cGrew
Michel Construction Inc.
425.776.2211
Dwight@michelproperties.com
7907-212THSW,#102 * EDMONDS,WA98026 * (425)776-2211 0 FAX(425)778-9086 0 #MICHEC106ID5
04/10/2006 17:02 4257789086
MICHEL CONST PAGE 02
*.ROVED BY ENGINEERIN%'33
Name ofProposed Project:
FLECITY OF EDMON&
'go RECEIVED
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Owner/Apollicalit: 4
Name
14 �-Si
ww
Street/Mailing Address
ndu. 4 1 d
CK, 'Statc zip
Telephone:
WORK SHFFT
APR 1 2006
PERMIT COUNTER
ApplJcant Contact Persoxi:
Of 7:6 cev
Name
Z
Street/Mailmg Address
City State Zip
Tcicphone:
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis:
Firm Name Contact Name
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION,
Telepbonc
a. Street address (if known): Ca & SY, - — —
b. Location:
(Attach a vicinity map and site plan.)
c. Specify existing land use: t 5P —
d. Specify Proposed type and size of development: 50 — —
When will the project begin construction and when will it be completed? ";;O� Zmg1menaw
f. Define proposed access locations:
g. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: too IJJQ Wo LC.L%
Page )
04/10/2006 17:02 4257789086 MICHEL CONST PAGE 03
Five Years After Opening LOS:
With Project:
Without Project:
Note any assumptions/van ations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific ti-affic impacts. Traffic impact
fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified
in ECDC 18.82-120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130.
0 f(o I&
S.AENGJt\DwTxLhCky Pr*cuMA Page 5
04/10/2006 17:02 4257789086
MICHEL
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
7907 212TH ST. SW. # 102
EDMONDS. WA 98026
PHONE (425)776-2211
FAX # (4251 778-9086
MICHEL CONST PAGE 01
-F-A X
T 0: D ATE: tio t c�
FROM :
REGARDING: oL-Zla-
ORIGINAL TO BE MAILLD: YES N o
NuMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE: c
MICHEC101FIDS
qOTREET FILE
(ITC!, LIST 71
1j"PILDING PIR"UT PT-Vi".
Street Pight-oF-11-:ay Existin�_(OOZ&IO Tu..nj,) WAC
Access Ensoments Existing
T 0)
Utilitv Fascinent Existina RFOD
mc)
Lot Pcr.Iubdiv;sJon_____ PI at Arsessor I'lop
Sito PI.,m ntocl.od for Accuracv
/3
I'l'o, v I. C� 'I
sting, '-Inin Si--_
1"" It C r � 'i7i ft-Q'Qg_' ! i rc d
Hydn'w't Size
111%,(Iralit ed per
Fire
P,,:tector n�cd: I."C( :i
Fj
(I OIN i t�. I
Septic -'^%��prcovvd ---- --
lit
sorltj C
Dnrdllo
;9 Side Scv-or Ava, it-
FC, or -i
C)i,,nection F-co Ponuired
SIII
0
ic...! In,
ze
m
0
"roi
Pate
7 r'-- 7 = n= 77 - 7 7
ell
CI 13 VC 17 t PCC'IIi)-CCI C
C.RtCh B.I-,ill PC(Alired
�j
co.
N'll)" 101c, re(jilired
Soil Condil.1-V �F. Ground I.Jatel. Fic2cl O"(!Ched
mp���
1:0 oil !7i,':c PI'm
Tildicate on Si to
Pate
I
Strc laving, Rcqui i 'cd.
litt IIL
Rirb -tnJ Gutter iiircd
oil
Sidewalk Pccuircd
locwan
Curl) Oot for Privc,,:ay Pc(juirc(—.---
Pight-of-I":ay Construction PCII"lit Rcoll,
Bond 11cquired. for Riblic. Im. reiments,
Street N,-u-,ic Sj.,(�q
)t]ICr
PCO..11il CI
Pre te Inspection r-nJc on
C
BY: Seyer-
Water
S-
Engincerinp,
Spe.cial. I�e(juircmonts listed in mmoo to Building, J�'-ptirtmic.nt
All items filled in on Building Pcinit Application
--Date---
St'u-II)Cd "I""d "..'Otations "I"10C
By Date
Cpal-tl- 'I t
App) XC(I
V
a
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
505 BELL STREET
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 99020
APPLICATION FOR INVASION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
(Submit -In Dupli"te)
Permit to be issued to:
For work at: (address or vicinity)
Type of work to be done:
(Attach Drawing When Applicable)
Owner:
Name
Rilling Addrds
City State
Contractor:
Name
Mailing Address
City ata. te
Signature:_.
Owner or Agent
Telephone Number
Telephone NUMber
--BWt� Signed
DO NOT WRITE BELOW, THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
Permit Issued (date)—
Remarks:
Permit Number
ENGINEER'S APPROVAL DATE
L 7
PneAra
rl-----------
:1 "A Good Customer Is Worthy of Every Consideration"
WESTEON Win S
lb Uk Co.
Waterworks, Industrial & Heating Supplies
ly
el
0 5409 OHIO AVE. SO.
TTLE, WASH. 98124 S EATTLE, WASH. 98134
P. BOX 3524
-7025
CP el, SEA ROckwell 2
7
-A
: Ij
Y
2- -
F-1-T
IY,
7
lot .7-
City of Edmonds
City Engineer's office
COMPLAINT REPORT
Referred to for Action Ron Whaley, Public WorKs Time 4, 00
S I'l iLET FILE
Report No. 706
Date 7/27/70
Received by Mary Jane Fritzler Time 4:30 Date 7/24/70
Made by Mrs. Alaniz, 618 Glen Street
Address Tel.778-3348
How Received: Letter Telephone In Person x
Nature of Complaint: She is unable to get into her driveway since Mr. Salamonsen
paved the alley for his apartment tenants. She registered a complaint several months
ago, but has had no action.
Engineering Department Recommendation or Comments Checked by Bill Nims
Mrs, Alaniz has been denied access_to her garage and driveway due to the change in
grade created -by the paving. The Engineering Dept. didn't inspect this project. The
Contractor isn't responsible for correcting the problem when the City neglected to
notify him that any problem existed. Therefore, the City Street Dept. should regrade
Mrs. Alaniz's driveway with pit -run gravel.
xj§xlkmgxxlx I — Date-7/27/70 — Engineer
Describe Action Complet ed: ,21tv
/WAPUdZ6 A 121711 ;% 12 e- At 6E&I-tZ id & dAA4Ced_=,* 1442,e4 d/ -C
61 "'ON I
Time Date 0 Completed by
Leaation Sketch:
1405- A2 I?$ -
w" -
LL"
u �22 : 2
Z Lij Lu
LLI wl> --I
LL Q)
a 4$
loo
V
LLJL-j X
APPROVED BY PLANNING
41MLV�lo I 9—Lj:Lo-7—
LANDS
SCALE: 1'= 10-0"
'. w PT Pw- " L
RESUB
VEB 9, 3
WrL
,,W&PF
WUON
z
u
z
U
cl
Z
M
OE
w
0
�4
u
mmmmmmmlmmmvm�
7.11.06
REVISIONS:
10.30.06
2.22.07
PRINTED
2.22.07
-11 .. .......... .. ,
1Y
yy
AVE. GRADE
A. 73.98'
B. 75.22'
NEW GI3 #3 TYPE Ll C. 75.54'
KEMOVE OLD 2" WATEKLINE & AO/
- LL""
'�'v'uy r
140.00' PIM 73.00' r ,,EWAY CUT OPKINKLEK-COIIA60 D. 75.90'
L"J'
13
E�� I NVK IN 69.45' 4 = 75.16'
FEi F13 p5olff, .0.;C. J_ ot
WUP OUT r-O.A51 -2(D
MAX HEIGHr 105.16'
F-1 Fyir,70r, w - -nia 11*_
LU
a.
Ckl/4q? Sgg�CC
Z
VA
.A�.
ro 13E F
76�
/Oor
50 5P
76
74
72
70
68
INVK IN;�0:30' 793.84 ft 2
INVR<DT70.30'
ZTLET ORIFICE 71b
015TING 2511131,KCH (A.2
A
,T6, I�EAIEM OVE
=-XISTII
lkk_ UAL rmluril = luq.DO
FOOTING = 72.16'
N tMCK FLOW SLAB = 74.16'
DOUBLE CHECK 10' 09 LW-W6tL1;S 1ST FL = 83.16'
AILL30X C U5TEKIMM- 2ND FL = 93.16'
FAM
X. ER 5TD Ef.7 IMPERVIOUS ARE es IL -�&36 Sw+
NEW G[3 fl TYPE Ll BUILDING: 2,800 SQ. FT. -r AW
DRIVEWAY: 1,347.94 SQ. FT/AW4i�,>-:- A5054-"
VK 70-30' PATIO: 494.13 SQ. 1717.
TOTAL:-4642_07_SQ. FT.
-rOr '7r- P;01 r-12 A n1P PT A T%TlP AVIP
TOE: 75.50' a 77.25', b 77.25', c 78.25',
d 77.25'/ 4 = 77.50" (77.16 MIN.)
GRADING CALCS
BLD: 75.16'AVE.-74.16' FINISH = 1.00'
75 1.00'X 2,784.00 SQ. FT. (BLD FOOT PRINT)
2,784.00 CU. Fr./ 27 = 103. 11 YD. CUT
-TOP: 77.16' DRIVE: 76.19' (AVE) - 75.19' FINISH 1.00"
TOE: 74.16'
1.00' X 603.99 SQ. FF.
603.99 CU. FT. / 27 = 22.37 YD. CUT
P: 77.25'
rOE: 74.25' t490 YARD 1:
fOP:77.25' 1.87' (AVE) X 603.99 SQ. F-F.
fOE: 74.25' EX15TINGI HOU5E 1129.46.CU.FT. / 27 = 41.83 YD. FILL
YARD 2:
TOP: 77.25' TO BE REMOVED
2.16' (AVE) X 228.60 SQ. Fr.
TOE: 74.25'
493.78 CU.FT/ 27 = 18.29 YD. FILL
TOP: 77.25' 4;1 APjI 114! 7A I A' YARD 3:
TOE: 74.25' 1
'5;M-T fr-O
TOP: 77.25'
TOE: 74.25' EXIOTING &;'131 C
-TOP: 77.25' TO 13E REMOVED
TOE: 74.Ar4"
J,
,TO�.- 77.25, EX15TING GARAGE
TD BE REMOVED- ------
2.1' (AVE) X t071.24 SQ. 1717. =
2249.60 CU.FE / 27 = 83.32 YD. FILL
51TE BENCHMARK: EX15TING C13 IN ALLEY5
OF 5W PKOPERTY COKNEK KIM 765.25'
DATUM PIT:KAILKOA[) 5PIKE ON EA5T
FACE OF POWEP, POLE LOCATED APPKOX 170'
EAOT & 50'NOKTH OF NOKTHEA5T PP\OPEP\TY
COKNEK. ELEV, 7ro.59'
EXISTING GRADE ----------
PROPOSED GRADE
INDIVIDUAL TRA5H CONTAINER5 IN
PRIVATE GARAGE = INDIVIDUAL 5ERVICE
705
-1 OP: 77.25' ALL NEW, EXrENDEP, KE-13UILT OK KELOCATEP
10E: 74-75' ELECTKICAL UTILITY ANP/OK 5ERVICE!3HALL
EM51ING CARFLIRT 13E PLACEP UNDERGKOUND.
.251 BE R ytt� LOT LINE5 & 5ET[3ACK 5TAKEE, MU5T1
E: 74. .25L- DE IN PLACE AT TIME OF FOUNDATION
2 .5' IN5PECTION.
-P7 ".)rl 9FOR LOWE0T FLOOK OF 13UILPING TO
,2 5 <
yp
----------
. H DRAIN? - MEET THE�13E�INITION OF A 13A5EMENT,
2S[�qNC K TONE ALL5 HAVE DEEN PKOVIPEP
EY5
A TO 13UILP UP THE GKAPE ON THE EA5T &
-TOP: 77.25'
5-101 WEOT 51DE8 OF THE 51JILDING MAINTAINEP
592. ft TOE� 7r AT LEA5T ro'.70" FKOM THE 13UILPING EF. WALL.
76
0 77
wow N
L)RAINAGE
(.17-6a-POOVEKLAY ALLEY FKOM PROFgft
�Z�Z )'�LEAN OUT INV.
TO PKOPEKTYLINE A&RETE E� Y&e T PLAN-.
CITYjN5PECTION -e§CALE: 0"
55 _San�& _Rjeuir
�_]51TE BENCHMARJ
A T T _U F,.,, t
FILTEK FA13KIC
CONTINUOU5
THKOUGH
TKENCH
If
7/6' WA5HEP
GKAVEL
FLOW
[3UKY FILTEK FA13KIC "
IN GKAVEL-LINEI) TKENCH
MOUND ON 130TH!5I1)E5 OF
FENCE AT THE 5UKFACE
Ir.Z.Vol
2X2 DF
OK 13ETTEK
r.
TOP501L
Cii,
FILTEK FA13KIC
OKGANIC 5P 5M
PK
AINING1-1/411
GKANULAK FILL
6'r-OWOM . 5)X.
,�VPEKF PKAIN PIPE
TRENCH SECTION
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'
STANDARD STRENGTH GRATE
FILTER FABRIC
17.
r.
.3611
1211
31 911 O.C. TIF311UIIKIY 130TTOM OF FILTEK FAE3KIC IN TKENCH
2x the spacing of City of Edmonds Requirements
FILTER FENCE DETAIL
NO OCALE 2X2 PF
OK 15ETTEK
FILTEK FAt3KIC
211- 41
QUAKKY
! I
5PALL5
TDP OF OWALE FLOW
7:7�
I I
L!
ROCK CHECKDIAM OECTION
NOOCA E
CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE
1. PRE-CONSTRUC
TION MEETING -
CONTACT COE ENGINEERING
INSPECTOR 425-771-0220
EXT 1326
CALL 24HRS IN ADVANCE FOR ALL
INSPECTIONS.
2. CALL FOR UTILITY
LOCATIONS
3. REVIEW ESC NOTES AND DETAILS
4. INSTALLATION
OF ESC DEVICES
5. INSTALL C13 PROTECTION
6, DUST CONRTOL
RREQUIREMENTS
7. GRADING ACTIVITIES
8. REFERENCE STABILIZATION
OF
EXPOSED AREA REQUIREMENTS
9. UTILITY ACTIVITIES
10. CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES
-f 11. REMOVAL OF ESC DEVICIE-S
(P, 12. INSTALLATION
OF LANDSCA-PIN(3
A. A. A 6.. A, A,
CATCH 13AI31N A, X-0 .70 5,711001
.144 W1 OVEKFLOW
HOLE5 */_0 O� F:4��
A.. A A
ON&-" ft 0:5ED WPIEKE 1`011151116 1%9/Fj!V4V11A1:1FLE_K 1�138
TFeVE 9 IE 6A+6I113A5IH'V' 1"_ 1'4 `5 1
T =_10 I1K15t3ffIvI5 All L9 WH EKE
H6T- REE31J N-940� �FOLO�PEO.
A - A FILTEK K=25'MIN.
FROTECTION.
12" MIN.
GLEN STREET
TEMPORARY
ROCK ENTRANCE
APPRO
> FIRE DERAR
A`�';' NgfED
FOOTING DRAINS NOT
TO BE TIED INTO
DETENVON SYSTEM
--'RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
& INSPECTION REQUIRED
V,--ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIAL
SDR 35
SCH 40
N-1 2
F81 0 HANCOR
-,�_4G-&'-9ffE5kALK FORM INSPECTIONS REQ'D
& SEWER INSPECTIONS REQID
ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO BE
COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS
OWN ER/CONTRACTORS IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DAMAGE
',--'TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE REQUIRED
1600.001 ALLEY
7663
,� 761
4'- 6' QUAKKYOPALO 1_�, FILTEK FENCE
EMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES ------
PKOVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGKE!3!5/ EGRE55 AKEA )1T, Maintain natural vegetation for silt control where possible.
TEMPORARY 2, Temporary erosion sedimentation control facilities shall be constructed by placing siltation
control filters around swales (natural or manmade) and shall be maintained in a satisfactory
ROAD ENTRANCE DETAIL condition until such time that land clearing and/or construction of permanent drainage facilities
SCALE: are completed and operational; Facilities shall then be removed and.the site restored to the original
or final design condition,
EXT15TING G13 3. As construction progresses.and expected seasonal conditions dictate, more siltation control
Sides 61vv_��
KIM 76.25' ILD facilities may be required to insure complete siltation control of this property. Therefore, during the
Rear 5 -ft,
IAMI: A,4,;tlj kvT
INVK IN 74.95 -b" W a Avg t M WWI hN,
"IN. ourse of construction, it shall be the obligation of the contractor to address any new conditions that
A44 P ItNif uk 3�
Other
INVR 75-13 -4�'OE AAW be created by his activities and to provide additional facilities, as may be needed.
0,0f;, " '. may
Heig ATIpi �,:"41
1 "A R.0j- 1,-,P VrVt-j1tjr A Pqr. KAinim"m PSM HirMMPnt-_;_ qt-_nhIi7=t-inn nf Pv noorl Ammoo All cnilc =v nic-ne4 61 1 e4 4; 1,;
REVIE1.41ED BY"
Di71,,';VA L. RPESKE, PJ,
66 L' I
4251 99 8,�,
;7
-�,,",5-3_34-73,90
J
[. -EX VIR E -5: 11/05/07
Aa6 n/o+rc(
APPROVED BY PLANNING
et4u",�- o(11191t)--7-
1,511A 16JCCA- +D d C-tj M �5
bf A-V 13 - ?/0 -,kg
NO SCALE
Q
AWT k"4 A WIMA W4 cr 41114,
#'AdWO,411L *Or �1411% 2ou 0!
vat 4, �N't . %M
CA" Q Ul "U
activities shall be staliblized by suitable application of BMPs, including, but not limited to, sod
t1A
hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plasitic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected,
PRIVEWAY CENTERLINE
designed and maintained in accordance with the Manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized
F ELE (50LITH
W4,'l -If d =1 h�r ;1'
according to an approved timetalbe. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two (2)
4 tV"f 0 If"
days from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven (7) days from May 1 through
f Ir vry
PIN INAAM iNor-To kv 1.1 i
September 30)
air 0 4%.
-0
-T
"T �< 1
1 1
ols:wl
ir&, w" ,o#
v%,14�r4 -4 al r 0 1" w A #-A,= ;A -00
5. Construction Access Route, Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practicle, limited
�, 1 1, _,
to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or cruched rock to minimize the
<1� ...- .. '_.� �# .;I
i Ir vt 4, 1, �#Ar 4
VAV
tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads
2
it OV�w f.W NIAef Vir VIT 4
0AM %; Aj� 41�1t!q Pvt!4, "A'' MCA T
VV,
",v A..%R ra t A"% 4. 1'�w n
- %�
s",
shall be cleaned thoroughly at -the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling
CL
Off", .11*NM
Ip
ovott#!IN I* I
IWW� 1: P
or sweeping and transported to a controlled sediment desposal area within 24 hours, Street washing
+
", , 'I
k", 100 Nll not I
shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner,
+
A t.0=1* vo PC 1: mt=
r.,t,=WA14 rI* IV
6. ESC Minimum Requiremen�, - Manintenance. All erosion and sediment control 8MPs shall be regularly
I C0X'k1Z'*PV,1I�t0,' *4 VWT SrInLN,
rti t-d VIOP/ ou
X ANN MO t4
ft1t~%q 4141 41411Ift,
inspected and maintained by th owner to ensure continued performance of their intended function. All
Vf04#V.*A#kW11'
J,
maintenance and repair sahll he conducted in accordance with the manual,
PRIVIEWAY GENTERLINE
U1*1Aa$:61%1. YW40
to �$Zxv
OrMt FSC M-Iwi
jV4r.*V%I �e I'm t.,*
AA NCO V. �' I;
t4Vrv%j4&,imrA
MAT MV WIM
�f %4' 1,�P 4W
7. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and Fill Slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and constructed
PROPILE (NORTH 2RIVQ
0" Mw. A4, MY IN- X A?Pktr.) *1%,
re 4k,
OL
r.", 10,14W _tT%,;y ;01
0.
in a manner that will minimize erosion. In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC
flAA4;t NV�n %V CAJI tV Ml�
Requirement No. 2.
.44
91, '1011
WIN.611 A"M I -A
8. ESC Minimum Reauirement Storm Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made onerable durinn
construction shall be protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without
4" V:3 first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment.
9. ESIC Minimum Reouirement - Protection of Adiacent Pronerties. Adiacent orooerties shal be orotected
140 150 160 170 180 ISO 200
10 20 30 40 50 60 713 80 so 1 0 110 120 130 210 220 2:
NEW C13 #1 TYPE
t!
I IF A CS
KIM 74.30
#2
RIM 74.30
FEM
INVR Oul -10.,30
INVR IN 70.30
NEW_C!37#'5Tn"E���
RIM 73.00
INVR IN 69.45
4NVIR 01 IT Gq
EX15TING C13TYPE
1
-
RI = 70.09V
FX INV IN = 615.78-6"
PVC F
40 LN`FT 24"
ADS @ 01/o
IN R OUT 7O.3O_
4h
NEW CD #4 TYP
6
DI
EX. INV OUT =
67.a8-1211 CMP V
3034
140 L,N
FT 12"DIA N
12 OR PVC 9
Rim 71.110
_JNV_1N = .94
INV OUT = 67.9,
NEW IN = 67.65-101
N
F
I\J-'l 2-UH r-VU``Q=_ 'I -/o
I Z -UN", I
I IVII _L1 )I
'0 STREET FILE
A r- JtV
>
PE14T
gar
rmus
jum 08 2aol
Z
U
C)
Z
U
0
N
U,
Z
U
Uj
M
Z
Uj
W
01
0
U
NO
W44
*414
Z
0
a
W
U
N
0
U
4
0,1
UO
0
U
7.11.06
REVISIONS:
10.30.06
2.22.07
4.25.07
6.04.07
PRINTED
6.4.07
NOTRUCTION
AHEAD /
50.001
OHOULDER
CLOOED
50.001
W20-? 13/0 W20-? [3/0
36110611 36110ro"
IN5TALLOIDEWALK
CL05ED 5IGN
410gwh-�- 6wiw Aitin
v(k oAgIL
��Wmte" m�> Wf
W*(Isf jgft6�ddd
50,00,
a I
5INGLE TRUCK5 ONLY
5R-104 TO DAYTON ST
.4 RIGHT ON DAYTON TO OTH, LT ON 6
TO GLEN ST
,, THEN TO 7TH AVE; RIGHT ON PALEY TO 6TH I
TO PAYTON & 13ACK OUT TO 5R-1040 I
ALLEY
CLOOEP
IN5TALL ON CORNER
AT OTH AND ALLEY
16 1 MIN.
�71jgw isr.,aviil.-All
ALL" —r'o WM"-'W OPgi� 6JAS1029 OKANC, P-A-V10 6
vvx,1146 3tamc-lww V��WREE5 PAa f4OTICO
--ro
C1
13
.EOEND:
3 16' Mim. Traffic Conce
Olen Mountea on Poet or TrIpM
*510m Mountea on Type If 13arricade
IIN6TALL OIDEWALK
CLOOED OIGN
MICHEL -CON19TRUCTION INC.
212TH ST. S.W. 51JITE 102
PHONE 1.425.776.2211
PERMIT # 014m...?
DATE 07.13.06
3
ALLEY
CLOOED
11145TALL ON CORNER I
AT 7TH AND ALLEY I
AS NOTED
GY ENGhNJEERING
Date:�_
--- Z-Z—Z-ZZ X--2--
A)a-ws 5#tgg:-r T�
doata�, or sk P&54�1
f3l*t�6
W
4
u
u
�5
0
u
0
1,-�
E?
u
W
u
z
Q
z <
Lu
crj a
v- Z
00
M
ci
w
a
u
0
0
u W..i
0
w
v
7.11.065
REVISIONS:
10.30.06
2.22.07
PRINTED
2.22.07
REBUS
FEB 2 3 2007
5U
&RN11 Q
AFITMEI',n-
Mor,JM
0
-f6
13 1-
V ZZZI:� - - V V
NEW C5 #,3TYFE L1
0 KIM 73,00'
140.00' 1 NVK IN 69.4-5'
PEP_ F3 n I H I 1,1�11p n, 1-r
_______W - - . - - . - W
REMOVE OLD
DRIVEWAY CUT
PIW PER
EXIOTING WM TE5K '
CUT/CAP 5EVICF,,.--
AT MAIN
AVE. GRADE
A. 73.98f
B. 75.22'
C. 75.54'
2" WATERLINE &
Dz.Z5-.9O'
FIRE-OPKINKLEK-COMDO
/ 4 = 75.16'
MAX HEIGHT = 105.161,
ACTUAL HEIGHT= 104.581
FOOTING = 72.16'
NEW
SLAB = 74.16'
WMI
1ST FL = 83.16'
2ND FL = 93.16' -
IMPE IO11S_ARE
MAIL[30X
C.U5TER
PER
5TD E,
5.7
BUILDING+EAVES: 3315.00 SQ. FT,
DRIVEWAY: 1,150.00 SQ. FT.
G'
ONEW C13
r;
fl TYPE Ll
PATIO: 494.13 SQ. FT.
L6
7
0'
70-50'
TOTAL: 4,960.00 SQ. FT.
TOP: 7 ro-5 0'
GRADE PLANE-AVE E=I�IV=110
TOE: 75.50'
a 77.25', b 77.25', c 78.25',
d 77.25'/ 4 =, 77.50' (77.16 MIN.)
GRADING CALCS
BLD: VE.-74.16' FINISH 1.00'
-75.16'A
75
1.00'X 2,784,00 SQ. FT. (BLD FOOT PRINT)
2,784.00 CU. FT./ 27 = 103. 11 YD. CUT
-TOP: 77.16'
DRIV 76.19' (AVE) - 75.19' FINISH 1.00'
TOE: 74.16'
1.00'X 603.99 SQ. FT,
603.99 CU. FT./ 27 = 22.37 YD. CUT
�21
CUT TOTAL = 184.00 YDS. CUT
YARD 1:
1.87" (AVE) X 603.99 SQ. FT.
1129.46.CU.FT. / 27 = 41.83 YD. FILL
YARD 2: '
7
N.,
2.16' (AVE) X 228.60 SQ. FT.
493.78 CU.Fr. 27 18.29 YD. FILL
YARD 3:
2. 1' (AVE) X,, 1071.24 SQ. FT.
2249.60 CU.FT./ 27 = 83.32 YD. FILL
SITE 13ENCHMARK: EX16TING C13 IN ALLEY 5
OF CW PROPERTY CORNER RIM 76.25
DATUM FT:KAILKOAD 5PIKE ON EA5T
FACE OF POWER POLE LOCATED APPROX. 1701
EA5T & 50'NOKTH OF NORTHEAOT PROPERTY
CORNER. ELEV 76-691
E. IV
EXISTING GRADE ----------
Q
"I,
Z
PROPOSED GRADE
K
INDIVIDUAL TRA5H CONTAINERS IN
RIVATE GARAGE = INDIVIDUAL SERVICE
ttlk Vo 70
MT ALL NEW, EXTENDED, KE-13UILT OR RELOCATED
I ELECTRICAL UTILITY ANP/OK 5EKVICE5HALL
13E PLACED UNDERGROUND,
LOT LINE5 & 5ET13ACKOTAKE5 MUOT
13E IN PLACE AT TIME OF FOUNDATION
IN5PECTION.
*FOK LOWE5T,FLOOK OF 13UILL)ING TO
MEET THE�IJEFINITION OF A I3A5EMEN-r,
KEY5TONtWALL5 HAVE 13EEN PKOVIPEP
__A TO DUILD UP THE GRADE ON THE EA5T &
-TOP: 77.25' WE5T 51PE5 OF THE 5UILDINGMAINTAINED
.00'.
TOE: 76.10' AT LEA5T &-0" FROM THE 5UILDING EXT. WALL.
-------------- 592, ft-
MOM
77 Am�
lk
t __1 00011 rr I I . . li" 1 11 # I S Q)
76 rZ
TY
TY WITH 12" CI 'ALO"'LAN
X' 0"*-UTILI 0" CLEAN OUT - OVERLAY ALLEY FROM PROPERTY LINE N
TO PKOPEKTYLINE A5 DETERMINED 13Y &
POLE LOCKING LAMFHOLE� CITY IN5PECTION SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"'
__Flc;rrr: FwmrHMAR
E)(T15TING C5 Y
'ALLFL--d
RIM 70,25'
INVK IN 74-96 -&" W
INVK 75.13 -4�'OE
9:77,25'
74.75'
EN 151 IN, 9 CARFqRT
BE R
I-: 74�> -25t
.25'
""J
PEVIE"VED BY.-
C7,
DONNA L. BRESKE, RE,
6601 FOS TER SLDUGH R-0-
Uri-, f�
SAIGH,13141SH, 1,1A 98290
"k,
273P
P14L 4 1_15 - 3.,>,4 - 9 9.90
YVE
425-334 - 7,380
FAX.,
brcske Vcorisul tmoio�rp. cor,
I W,
76
74
72
70
6e
t:
ca
+ N
+
DRIVEWAY GENTEELLNE
PROFILE (50LITH PRIV
11/05/07 1
A AOM-0:MMA"!'� kk_�,, -17 /� /_ , T\Tn qC A TY
FILTER FADKIC
CONTINUOU5
all
\t
THROUGH
TRENCH
7/5" WA5HE D
GKAVEL
FLOW
..." \ A
13UKY FILTER FADKIC /
IN GKAVEL-LINED TRENCH
MOUND ON 130THOIDE5 OF
FENCE AT THE OUKFACE
2.00'
2X2 PF
OR 5ETTER
r.
TOP 501L
LO
F FILTEK FA13KIC
ORGANIC 5P OM
FREE DRAINING 1-1/4
GRANULAR FILL
5P_5M/5M
\- 4" PERF, DRAIN PIPE
TRENCH SECTION
SCALE: 1/ 2" = 1'
STANDARD STRENGTH GRATE
FILTER FABRIC
..J
3611
211
31 011 O.C. 713UI'\Y 130TTOM OF FILTER FAI3KIC IN TRENCH
2x the spacing of City of Edmonds Requirements
FIL
TER FENCE PETAIL
NOOCALE 2X2 DF
OR 13ETTEK
L
FILTER FAI3KIC
211-41
QUARRY
5FALL6
TOP OF OWALE FLOW
11
L!
r-11
ULEN STREET
00006-
M*` 14! 0M elMi rreeev "t, V "*1 NNI we, 0V
TEMPORARY
ROCK ENTRANCE
N _8 11% W-41 Z at cm, Z Le 0J
A A IL
:MN
M N1111114 roll I I I
PM 114:
. ..........
. .........
12. REMOVAL OF ESC DEVICIES
ROCK CHE KDIAM 5ECTION
NO 9CA E
I C_'
0"" 'X'�
PO cl�'
I)SO, �"s
FILTER SOCK -CB
PROTECTION 1418S
PER COE DETAIL E1.3
A -..A FILIER 5nrK
FROTECTIO-N.
N.0,
, a5 rw+td,
APPROVED BY PLANNING
IfCM9 in 5eiloacv_
14TE7,
f"I xul *,),I
rallft N Alf "J,
AM
Z4 A.,"At W "?A A Maw, Awl or 0 11'
$&.t# rAm* Or R;�Jrp P*
rAA' Au'sw. "? V CAQW.
-Aft' 11 V, I v*q" b WN
A M4 fIr-tA 1,15
r6kv I rb Im (g."O.- iAm* ru*' i -'t
144A V 0" W'!*'PW t1w F14, A.MrOFT
=I: I Mp"'
If 1w, 4 404 10( aw Zw
fw:w 0& vivima ft, -,* *Vi*1
Stkx 14Y PnTl IAf Mq, m.
a CVAN"u 'Wr 71W 440. .1"N'T PAL'X
I'll rk
LV Iftft s4t��01't
It, "Mr. r1o"P, CUT WIAK LYF41 to 514
r11tVr ON" Ov 011 P0141 pylk
slvm *1'�4
1-JA
r "'ACT O."A", '14
SA CO23 .00
lsvv 1:4. too V
K=25'MIN. -
12" MIN.
*- 6" OUAKKY 5PAL5
APPROVED AS NOTED
BY ENGINEERIKI
(eleAtooq
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
& INSPECTION REQUIRED
ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIAL
SDR 35
SCH 40
N-1 2
F81 0 HANCOR
UG-&"id�� FORM INSPECTIONS REQ:D
.1,,,-`-__"��ATER & SEWER INSPECTIONS REQ:D
ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO BE
COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS
OWNER/CONTRACTORS IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DAMAGE
--TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE REQUIRED
60.001 ALLEY
... 7051
b
�_ 761
L6
0
U
W
W
Z
U W
c
Z
Vol*
M
C�
W
to
N
0
Z
0
Z
W
N
0
vo
77
��77'
EMPORARY EROSION/ShIDIVIENTATION CONTKOL NOTES I
PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGKE55/ EGKE50 AREA
)1T. Maintain natural vegetation for silt control where possible.
2. Temporary erosion sedimentation control facilities shall be constructed by placing siltation
TEMPORA
control filters around swales (natural or manmade) and shall be maintained in a satisfactory
condition until such time that land clearing and/or construction of permanent drainage facilities
JL L--x
ROAD ENTRANCE DETA IL
are completed and operational. Facilities shall then be removed and the site restored to the original
SCALE:
or final design condition,
&714C M111,09"; ov 3, As construction progresses and expected seasonal conditions dictate, more siltation control
facilities may be required to insure complete siltation control of this property, Therefore, during the
course of construction, it shall be the obligation of the contractor to address any new conditions that
ltmv Iftl X"* 4*,.,l 1V'r
0 �4 1* V*;k, U; &I may be created by his activities and to provide additional facilities, as may be needed,
RIVX14 01W IFNIMC A"o A %p4w M11 4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stablization of Exposed Areas, All soils exposed by land disturbing
r" luft ", I mm Ir t; J* v A to r activities shall be staliblized by suitable application of EIMPs, including, but not limited to, sod
(444V!r IL wn 14%- 5,?4LA& &
,4M
."kXro , , OMMI&IL hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plasitic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected,
designed and maintained in accordance with the Manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized 0
4r
fw$ S,*%& V (JAVU13 according to an approved timetalbe, (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two (2) U
0* #04-rWw"I 1� days from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven (7) days from May 1 through
VWJ K*,� A W1 "PV" 01i, 11�li
=41110A d September 30)
#,1N, WAIA9 M"p or 2%** J01% 5. Construction Access Route, Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practicle, limited
11L . 7.11.06
to one route, Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or cruched rock to minimize the
wmuo�
REVISIONS:
tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads
shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling
r,.* Irwimu Avot
or sweepin 10.30.06
A r"It r4k t1;#9_y1W11$� g and transported to a controlled sediment desposal area within 24 hours, Street washing
01 shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner, 2.22.07
*044143 -.1 A
r* ly
6. ESC Minimum Requirement - Manintenance, All erosion and sediment control EIMPs shall be regular
4.25.07
inspected and maintained by th owner to ensure continued performance of their intended function, All
Ifni A , � r., JftWX*%tf' ery W ft maintenance and repair sahll be conducted in accordance with the manual,
6.04.07
bed
VfVC*%h "-r-VA *OV, 7. ESC Minimum Requirement - Cut and Fill Slopes. Cut and fill slopes shall be designed and construc,
U'11�143 *14"- ff 014 if J, po in a manner that will minimize erosion, In addition, slopes shall be stabilized in accordance with ESC 6.1509
'W-ve-14 rt 69: V11.114.h-
Requirement No. 2. 00
IL t*W sw4ftTor 14 "'.1
fa'* #" 00 ow E. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storm Drain Inlet Protection, All storm drain inlets made operable during
construction shall be protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without
VT. Tot IVINM 1. 4V
first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment,
N. lii
9. ESC Minimum Requirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shal be protected
from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or
mulching, or by a combination of these measures and other appr 4Pr. P INTEEDE
REVISED PLAN APPROVED 1qn
CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION
rmeAoy &;td new ZQawa'
PLANS EXAMINER
DATE
REE RLE
_'Evr.� U
WILDING DEPARTh"041T
CiTf 1-17 !:D11.10,1111113
11 _bl�_ '�s 1111:1 11 1 1 1;
111!aLLL.
j660 06V& 04��
m
P-A'
Ld
D i:
Z
Lij 0
p
0
< 0
z
Lo
0)
04
W W -W
8"Cl WATERMAIN U71LITY
VIRE HYDRANT POLE
'��CONC. CURB
0
GLEN'- STREET
N 89*59'51 " E-659 94' (MEAS) 660.00' (�41
91
149.99' 59.9 449.96'
EX. 3" BRASS CAP SURFACE 150.00'(P) 60.00'(P) EX. 3" BRAS
MONUMENT WITH 'Y' AND ASP H A L T P AVE MEN T SURFACE MO UMENT
PUNCH MARK D PUI
WITH "X" AND PUNCH
0
0
n n MARK
C.Q.
TOP=72.61
INV=70.29-6"PVC W
SD SD
C.Q. 11 ;99, 120.00'(P)
TOP=70.90 I
INV=r,11,78-6*PVC E
INV=67.88-12'CMP W
Al /—CONC. CURB
CONC. WALK WM
A 59.99 6,C, 0
T
n
6' WOOD
ICV FENCE
*O.,VE
6' WOO
FENCE
,.I-
,I'b
WMV7�
- - - - - - - - - - - -
(P)
PORCH I
zo
6 CHAIN
sl�� UNK FENCE
q
A --
z
0
EXISTING
0
0
Al
HOUSE
C5
0
4
p
0
C)
0
cote*'�
PAVERS
b
x
0
CC)
5- CHAIN UNK W=
�IL
FENCE ±O.6'E FENCE
z
P�-- EXISTING
GARAGE
Q. Q.
TOP=76.2:,�:W
INV=74.R -EXrSrTING INC-RETE pAVEMENT
INV=75.13-4 SE XIST -- CARPORT c 'OF,
I SHEDJ lb r 1) �,P b. SET TACK WITH
-5 UTILITY WASHER-NO'D
E— 22969
L
s. S. M. H.
TOP=73.08 --- — — — —
INV=66.76 .1051 � 59. qq�=
N Vp9'51 E
Ilk ssin 4o ss—
bu Ss SO SS SO I Ss—
PUBLID ALLE.Y
70 J
ro.\"
-1 F -r A \�) D I T J CD)
Q L 0 C K -1 1) 21 S) JF-R A E -r -r J .R S
S
T FH E c i - FF D M 1\1 s
(V 0 L 81 P C
DALEY STREET
N 89*59'51" E
659.87'(M.) 660.00'(P.)
b
0
ui
m
C14
w
r-2
Lu Lli
o- :D
0 77
p
0 Ljj
0 >
z <
_rZ
-f-j
rll-
TEL
UTILITY
POLE
ae SS
AN I G '2`02j
A I,.;
SCALE : 1"=20'
6immi
0. 10' 20' 40'
LEGEND
EXISTING MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED
SET 1/2" X 24" REBAR &
CAP STAMPED ISA 22969"
(P.) COURSE AND/OR DISTANCE PER
BASIS OF BEARINGS
CENTERLINE OF GLEN STREET PER "EDMONDS CREEKSIDE (PHASE
1)", AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 50 OF PLATS, PAGES 279-283,
RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON - N 89*59'51" E
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 16 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 102, BRACKETTS
---FIRST ADDITION TO EDIVIONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 8 OF PLATS, PAGE 47,
RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS
OF RECORD.
BENCH MARK_
RAILROAD SPIKE ON EAST FACE OF POWER POLE LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 170' EAST AND 50' NORTH OF NORTHEAST
PROPERTY CORNER.
ELEVATION : 76.89
DATUM : CITY OF EDMONDS - M.L.L.W.
UTILITY NOTE
THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE
APPROXIMATE ONLY AND DO NOT REFLECT THE LOCATION OF ALL
UTILITIES ON OR IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE
OWNER SHOULD CONTACT ALL UTILITY PURVEYORS IN THE AREA TO
ASCERTAIN THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES.
BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY
FOR
MICHEL CONSTRUCTION. INC.
IN SW1 41 NW1/4, SECTION 24, T.27 N.; R.3 E., W.M.
CITY nF FnmnNn-q
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON
,�,)W,0075-
ndll--L
6&p 5�1-
<f�-
I arq
JWPOOW9-�j
S-lill"EET FILE
BUI,
j)EpAj3'
cl-P, CF