The URL can be used to link to this page

624 WALNUT ST.PDFiiiiii lill lill 13664 624 WALNUT ST �RECEIVEU 5'Lr" , o PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT ADDRESS: -S PLAN CHECK RECEIPT DATE: qhi,176 ............... - ...... . - ...... REVI WED BYt (IhitiM/Date) PLAN. WATER COMMENTS FIRE BLDG. SEWER STREET_ENG..... Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment Conditional Use Permit .. . ... . . . ........ ..... .. ........ 2 ADB Requirements 3 Other Zoning Requirements I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- -------- .......... 4 Underground Wiring Required 5 Lot Slope 15% 6 SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permiteo Tree Cutting Plan' ....... ..... . .. - -- Plat/Subdivision Requirements 5- 95- "To C .. . ... . . .. . ------- ...... ... ......... ........ 9 Legal Description Verification 10 Quit Claim/Street Dedications *� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Easements - Public/Private . .... ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - .. - 12 Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee 0 ----------- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ------ 13 Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee 30 ... . ............. .. ........ . . 14: Drainage Plan (On -Site) .... . ............. Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses .......... . ........ ... 16 Setback - Storm Drain Line ..... ............. ....... ..... .... ... Open Ditch - Existing ........ -------------- ---------------------- Culvert Required ........... Culvert Size 2 0 Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff Catch Basin Required . . . . . . . . . . . Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access �x 0., Sidewalk Required �23 24:::: Curb & Gutter Required ------------- Curb Cut For Driveway Required 26: Street Paving Required 27 Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required 28 Street Name Sign Required Other Signing Required . . . . . . . . Bond Required For Public Improvements . .30:� 31 FEMA Map Check/Water Table -------------------- . ...... ..... 32 ,Side Sewer Availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... 3 Reviewed By: FIRE PLANNING ENGINEERIN-G PU13LIC WORKS R E C 0 R D OF C 0 N T A C T 1 21 2 22 3 23 4 24 5 25 6 26 7 27 8 28 RW PERMIT # DATE ISSUED RECEIPT I 9 29 10 30 11 31 12 32 '�3 PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE 33 SS PERMIT # DATE ISSUED �ECEIPT #2-20-V 14 PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE 34 35 16 36 1� 37 METER SIZk*Z1 PAID $ 06-V-- DATE RECEIPT 18 38 19 39 20- 40 PLANNING DATA NAME:- * Sco SITE ADDRESS: DATE: ZONING: PLAN CHK#: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CORNERLOT (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: Z--, Left Side: Right Side:. 5— Rear: 1-5- Actual Setbacks: Front: 6 o Left Side: 3- Right Side: T' Rear: 37 Street map checked for additional setback required? 41. h (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum -Allowed: —Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT - Maximum Allowed: —Actual Height: 2 41 -3. Datum Point: tl 00 9A-vU Gxpv, Datum Elevation: 4 00' I SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #: SEPA DETERMINATION: LOT AREA: 4fo 4.. OTHER: Plan Review By: 77, rc7T SITE PLAN scale 111 201 Lot C of Short*Pla APPROVED BY-Jt--)L.A11N1,Jv t #5-95-180 ef — WALNUT ST utility easement drive ............ Z, lwl,1910- &V9.11 — DA MR -/./001 - la;?-. -5, / At 46�0�" roo ;., ovelhang x N. pa 10 7. West Coast Pho easerhent sewer easement MEL &.DONNA SCOTT. 1-1516 // 7 4 1- 6V I -A 7-1,o 1,f N'L rs� Z ai� op It Q V� .,90 J-�,WY6 NIT OP 10 PE '44 Ic 18 9 -2 P ERM.1T N2 Address of Construction: la4Pro . perty Legal Description (Include all easements): or Cd Of &/Wndi e4urelne44 /JarA eas-e_lnen� S_" /0 .Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. Building Permit No.—F60 704- Sing*le. Family Multi -Family (No. of Units El Commercial El Public Invasion into City Right-of-Way.:,n No Yes RW Construction Permit No. dross other Private Property: M No El Yes Attach legal description and copy of recorded. easement I certify that I have read and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back'of the Permit Card. Date CALL DIAL -A -DIG (.1-800-424-5555) PEFORE ANY EXCAVATION F_ 0 F FICE USE 0 NLY FOR INSPECTION CALL-744 -$.'UBLIC WORKS DEPT.. Permit Fee: -7 Issued By Yrunk Charge: Date Issue d: //-7 :��-796 Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: 'Lid No.: Partial Inspection: Date —Initial Comments Reason Rejected: Date I nitial Final Inspection Approved:. Dat lnitial��"4�_-/ 6y 7'� L.A." **'PERMIT.MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE'. White Copy; File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy; Applicant Re�isecl 3!90 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS F-1 LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER................................................................................................ CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO. d?. JOBADDRESS&'�4 ..................................... ................................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . .................................... 0 PWW-0001-1 1/75 (REVA 1/78) NAMEOF ADDITION ....................................................................................................................... EDtIONlDS T R ��TM"ENT PLANT �Al-C- CID- 0 LA. -ni.A,lsLPro4e#- Approved: J. DATE — ------------ By,.A.34,1 . ........... y ....... ............. r t .... ... 7** The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION E' REPAIRS E] LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO ........... OWNER............................................................................... 0. ................. CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT N JOB ADDRESS .... C 7- '( WA 4- All 7- ............................. ......... f., ....... -, ...... ............ - ....... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ............. ...................... NAME OF ADDITION ........................................... Approved: PIPAI PWW-0001 - 11175 (REV. 11/78) DATE ................ By ..0" &Vn-0-- ............. i0o ............................. ........... Earth Consultants Inc. STREET FILE Geowdinicol 1-inginecrs. (ittilogists & scientists September 3, 1996 Mr. Mel Scott 136 North 20th Street Shoreline, Washington 98133 Subject: Visual Site Reconnaissance Single Family Residence 624 Walnut Street Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Scott: r COUNTER E-7425 At your request, we are pleased to present the results of our visual site reconnaissance for the proposed subject residence. The purpose of our work was to visit the subject site, observe the general site conditions and provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for the proposed residence. Progect Descrir)tion We understand it is planned to develop the site with a two-story, single-family residence. The residence will be located on the upper south section of the site. Cuts and fills on the order of three feet will be required to prepare the site for construction. The building will be of wood -frame construction, utilizing a crawl space wood floor system. The garage slab will be a concrete slab -on -grade. Site Description - The rectangle-sh aped property is about sixty (60) by one hundred forty (140) feet'in plan dimensions. The site slopes u . pward from Walnut Street with a small knoll in the southwest corner of the site. The surface of the site contains sparse vegetation, with some trees along the last property line.. 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Bellevue (206) 643-3780 Seattle (206) 464-1584 FAX (206) 74-608-60 Tacoma (206) 272-6608 Mr. Mel Scott E-7425 September 3, 1996 Page 2 Subsurface Review In preparing this report, we reviewed geologic maps and subsurface information from our previous work in the Edmonds area. Our review indicates the site should be underlain by glacially deposited soils consisting of a thin veneer of recessional outwash overlying glacial till. In the adjacent west property, a house is currently under construction. Several excavations in the construction area revealed medium -dense silty sands with gravels. Site Reconnaissance On August 20, 1996, an engineer from ECI visited the subject site with Mr. Scott to observe the general site conditions, site slopes, and other geotechnical or geologic features which may impact the proposed construction. Overlying the till in some localized areas, we observed recessional outwash soils. The soil exposed on the adjacent lot consisted of poorly graded gravel with sand and silt. Recessional outwash is deposited as a relatively thin veneer by the meltwater streams as a glacier retreats. This soil is generallly medium dense. No indications of ponded water, groundwater seepage, or springs were observed. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our review and reconnaissance, it appears the site is underlain by medium dense soils. In our opinion, the site can be developed generally as planned. Building support should be feasible using conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on competent native soil or on structural fill. Foundations In our opinion, building support should be feasible using a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation system bearing on competent native soil or on structural fill used to modify site grades. For preliminary planning purposes, an allowable soil -bearing capacity of two thousand (2,000) psf for the native soil or structural fill can be used for foundation design. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor -of -safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. Earth Consultants, Inc. Mr. Mel Scott E-7425 September 3, 1996 Page 3 For frost protection, exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively.. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of .35 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred (300) pcf. These lateral resistance values are allowable values; a facto r-of-safety of 1.5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity; however, the majority of these events are of such low magnitude they are not felt without instruments. Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the Olympia area and the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area. There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at this site: ground rupture, slope failure, and liquefaction. Ground Rupture The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion that the risk of ground rupture during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. Earth Consultants, Inc. Mr. Mel Scott September 4, 1996 Slope Failure E-7425 Page 4 The site and vicinity are underlain by relatively high strength, very dense soil. In our opinion, the potential for a seismically induced slope failure affecting the site is minimal. Liquefaction Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. Based on our review and reconnaissance, it is our opinion the site is underlain by medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel and poorly graded gravel. In our opinion, the liquefaction potential for these soils is negligible. Limitations The recommendations and conclusions presented in this letter are based on our site reconnaissance, the project information provided us, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. If encountered soil conditions differ than those interpreted in this report, ECI should be contacted to evaluate those conditions. We trust this letter meets your current needs. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully submitted, I EXPIRES 0310719'�- —1 Earth Consultants, Inc. RECEIVF.L) , jqq PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST DUBLMW&Mf QW.E: P FSA K PROJECT ADDRESS: RECEIPT DATE: PLAN. WATER CO!Vlt�ENTS FIRE. BLDG, SEWER STREET.....: ENG..- Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment . . . . .. . . . . . Conditional Use Permit ADB Requirements 3 Other Zoning Requirements - - - - - - - Underground Wiring Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lot Slope 15% tc 6 SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit ev Tree Cutting Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Plat/Subdivision Requirements 5- 95- Vip c Legal Description Verification -10-1 Quit Claim/Street Dedications Easements - Public/Private Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee 0 .13 Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- ----- ....... Drainage Plan (On -Site) .......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses -0.11 Setback - Storm Drain Line 17 Open Ditch - Existing Culvert Required - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Culvert Size 20 Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff . ... ......... -21 Catch Basin Required . . . . . . . . . . . Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access Sidewalk Required Curb & Gutter Required Curb Cut For Driveway Required 1 1,25., Street Paving Required oe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required le Street Name Sign Required - W0 �, 29 Other Signing Required Bond Required For Public Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ X.. FEMA Map Check/Water Table Side Sewer Availability . . ...... . . . . . . . IV - - - - - - - - Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID # WA Create Street File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Existing Water Main Size Water Meter Size Service Line Size 74 KI . . . . . . . Water Meter Charge Required Hydrant Required Hydrant Size Existing M Fire Une Charge Required -'Sprinkler -42.1- Street Cut,.* 72 . . . . . . . . . . Miscellaneous . ... .. Reviewed By: FIRE� PLANNING�� ttT F-1, SITE PLAN scaie 1" = 201 Lot C of Short'Plat #6-95-180 WALNUT ST utility easement drive R. MEL & DONNA SCOTT. area.= Bo2,7 st At OfO' roof overhang ----------- West Coast Phone easement A N-N-1 sewer easement f—) E7 A A I A Z- .. I 0 0 M "u > a) ca CO) M �Mo Z-4 ro 0 00 z 03 M 0 ''.1 1 C.) % 4kb M F PERMIT "PLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Jamal . Mahmoud, Engineering Irispector "ITI?Pr-T FILE Owner: /J4eLLA -1 � S "Tt Plan Check No: 2. 01 Address:- 6X 4 Wo, LA U -t- Date: ttoc_4 7_0 After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.M.40:00 P.rvL;WEEKENDSIHOLUDAYS — 10:00 A.IVL-6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 18.30.030d). 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 6., FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 18.30) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON.STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30) 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to (AV- %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) 10. Driveways must be paved frorn property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.30) 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter (ECDC 7.20). 14. A back water valve is required if downstaiis plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) 16. Connection tothe City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required. LID#. Fees paid: Yes— No Charge (ECDC 18.10) 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90) PPMrA"J= STREET FILE I SITE PLAN scale 1" = 201 Lot C of Short'Plat #�-95-180. WALNUT ST Inanhole ep ver rum utility easement lo lip drive drive Oct L w ks" p C. garage At f\ 0�,erhang,, - -7 pafftr West Coast Phone easement sewer easement MEL & DONNA SCOTT. eYI57-IN�& 60AJrOU95 M V >1 Cn M SITE PLAN scale 1" = 201 'Lot C of Short'Plat #5-95-180 I-efiu;u*r cod manhvAe. W—r -7)A -I' AA utility V\ 'Ooo o, 01 -1100 easement 1 11 1 I:0 drive 'No WALNUT ST V— X Goo' cool garage ro 0 f overhang West Coast Phone - - - — - — easement sewer easement , 13p— C) CD MEL & DONNA SCOTT