The URL can be used to link to this page

627 DAYTON ST (2).pdfP I Al .......... 7 CITY OF EDMONDS File No 4-41 s WASHINGTON Date 96 XHIBIT 2. ED!1�0"D Fee- . ;rso.no APPLICATION TO HEARING EXAMINER APO'S FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Rect. No. (I rn' HEARING DATE 1 P-1 APPLICANT. 1� ADDREss2-20/()6- B�J)Z& P H 0 N E. C( 1351 &11-0-� �C-Amnk)63 WA 0180zc� Indicate type or degree of interest in the -'property: CWNCA- 0 1ATNER: i7- ADDRESS LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY t)V C 1-1 -5 I �00 T OF Lo F � 3 �( PHONE 6,� PV4 98 0 -L ? - C) 3 2-.3 3 A N/3 774CL - 1<::� 9 7, PL4 T OF C I /-'-I e2p I � ----- ., To be completed by the Planning Division: Use Zone Legal description checked and approved by: Date: VICINITY SKETCH: PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EM-1PLE, INDICAIING NORTH. EL.ample-. I CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: DETAILS OF PROPOSED USAGE L-6 Wc— VA-(ZJ-- opr-iccr-S AN,-6 . 0 r--rl C r-�7 W I la� -kll Representative &/V6-S Xe- kiwo'. RELEASEMOLD HARIMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing.the application agrees to release, indemnifv, defend and hold the City of Edmonds har-mless from anv and all damazes and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from anv act4on or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in w�oie or in part upon false, misleading or incOMDlete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its Dermission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of'insDection and post attendan 0 t:h,*s application.. ignattutre o AvDlicanc, Nner . Revresentacive M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M il DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT Please answer all questions What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? 777ir 4AI jZ oq- 1/0y7c i-1 7V /1-1/4/A,, i /t-/ 2. How does your property differ from other property in the same vicinity? (2R -4-LS /3 j �F MP dx 3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? /Vo 1,V, CC A -I ^CC) 4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted? Will these hardships have been caused by your own action? �2 LjZf IAI 'D 7 7 1VC,A lrf� 3-( 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? /�,�6-5&-IVFI!V _AV(,1m,1e- 15,11 1 /9L 0&�L 0/2- -/-/k- ff� r oseci op DURBIN DRIVE Addition to Pacif ic Insurance Underwriters FL- L10.0 F9 F� Building C�1-7 PAY-rbN -5-rP-CET- Ex1c;rntJ6- WIL,17W& A: '-rWO t>Topy WCOo rppme 49 2 5F Uj LU Of OrriCr,- WITH 1�-,W 5F. t3Af�emewT LLI T LULJI 4-q-0 CO mr x W TA L -TIAO S-rogy mA6eFjrY AWC> WOOD Ffpla�/ '0 AtzcA- opf:16,e ACOMarA To J3LjjLDw4& A D(ft5nt,* 0 0. VAiQ-Y1N,b r-Rom W-ro So''M 17p,--A OJOL.-, -rpe-fr,-S --) A-r 5AS5 C-TYPICP't, -TF S) G LAwtJ I DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Conditional Use Permit for Professional Office Addi±-i-on Proponent Ronald Walker, Jr Location of proposal, including street address, if any 627 Dayton Street Lead agency Edmonds Planning Department The -lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a prob- able significant adverse impact on th.e envi'ronment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decisfon was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on ffle with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on reques-t. There is no comment period for thi's DNS. This DNS i*s issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal,for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted b Responsible official Duane V. Bowman Position/title Assistant City Planner Phone Address 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020,4 __4L4 Date July 29, 1986 signature If _X/ You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to Jner_ at 250 5tb Ave. N Frimands, - WA qRn?n no later than 1986 --- b nPA1 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Duane Bowman to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. /r X 7There is no agency appeal. MIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. Purpose or Chcck-list: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43.21C RON. requires all governmental agencies to consider the crivironmenial impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of C. Q-.nc)- identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce this checklist is 10 Provide information to help you and the ag ency decide whether an EIS is required. Or avoid impacu, from thc'proposal, if it can be done) and to help the a-, Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental anen- 0 cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are sip-nificant, requiring briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best de - preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions 0 scription you can. -e. In most cases, you should You must answer each question accuratel\ and carefully, to the best of your knowled - be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you I S-W plN to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap- reafl\ do not know the an er, or if a question does not ap y delays later. ply'. Complete answers to the questions now ma\ avoid unnecessar3 eaulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer Some questions ask about governmental r these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. plan to do them over a period of time or on The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental a\ ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in - effects. The aRency to which you submit this checklist m y formation reaionably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use or checklist for nonprojecl proposals: IN AD - Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not apply." DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NIONPROJECT ACTIONS (part 15). For nonprojecl actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site should be read as "proposal," "proposer." and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: 'K-�b 2-& 'b)-7 C,1A./dJ L L Aj(--, Alb IS IP OA) 2. Name of applicant: P0-,w,L-/N P 1101z-eC--P- V 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 17-eb 2-a k-1 0/f b E�� 4/10,AJ,6 4. Date checklist prepared: -TU--Y 1Y 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ,5/)( v,,z 4�/&/-/-r mo&17-7t5 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if ycs, explain. 6 — I AW 4,_1 Phs PM d- M71 I - I 8. List any environmental iii.-ormation you kno-w about that has been pr , -red, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1V0A/C`_ 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting . the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Ad /(/' /*— A:�� 4411/1VI/ I r proposal, if known. 10. List any government.'approvals or permits that will be needed for you 01 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. 1 1. You do not There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposa need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) 7L7) AA 7-7,J ,OA AVCZ_&j,1J 6- C)7-A—r 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit an), plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with an), permit applications related to this checklist. 6 2 7 b,41 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one . olat oiling, hilly, stccp slopes, mountainous, other _. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? A10 SY oPe- s -2- q TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils arc found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. J1,q d. Arc there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. c. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of rill. /L'-�o f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so. generally describe. Al'o- g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? 1,(,' OA,'.7 1AJ1,, CJ 7U .45PIK+C—e— 4A., Y h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any- 1A,,,0A, d- 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed'? If any. gencrally describe and give approximate quantities if known. /V0 6 4,1 1 S S -., ,� ---S b. Are there any off —site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Alu'var EVALUATION FOR TO III; COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface Water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including vear—round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A..- 0 2) %Vill the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the descri water.,;? If yes. please des.cribe and attach available plans. #A10 - 3) E§timate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water Or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. InL dicate the source of fill material. 4) NVill the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. A'-d 5) Does the proposal lic within a 100—year floodplain? If so, note location on the plan. Ald 6) Does the proposal involve an), discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If go, describe the lype of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. k'o b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. A/0 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks� or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage-, industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe tile general size of tile system, the numbc of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or tile number of animals or humans the systcm(s) are expected to serve. IV67 CPA�0 A, 6-C TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. /VO M (a '—CYL d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ,--'deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other -�evergreen tree: Fir, cedar, pine, other -'shrubs —fl-rass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milroil, other .---other types of vegetation Ft,-�&LS b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? &'&."L� �V V44(r c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. A,1 o 1�1d— d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: &1177,1,/ tl� 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been'observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: b�i�rds?hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ................................. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: ............................ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ,A/U"- d- SIZ =mod TO BE COMPLETED BY hPI'LICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: IVCW A, d- 6. Enerav and Natural Resources a. What kinds of encra" (electric, natural gas, oil, wood siove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Jot,(_ b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, nenerally describe. 0 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. /VC) I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: ,A.,o A, b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A/0,A.,LF 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short—term or a long—term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. —1 AA L! M V" TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: PQ-0 B ex, 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of.thc site and adjacent properties? AL'a 1— 61 0 b. Has the site been uscd'for agriculture? If so, describe. f) IU c. Describe any structures on the site. 19 d. Will any structures be demolished? if so, what'? Alb c. What is the current zonina classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? IUC)A) CJ h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? I f so, specify. many people would rqide or work in ��e completed project? i. Approximately how +�-& 5,4 jr- /):S /qCr-�S-&A--TZ�� j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace'? A101C A/b k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and proiected land ;,7v 1 - 1, M- ,/ V /-5 AbT 67 uses and plans, if any: -7- 0 .1 TO BL COMPLETED BY AP PLI CANT 9. Housing a. Approximately how man), units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- d1c, or low—incomc housing. — 0 — b. Approximately how man), units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low—income housing. '--0— c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: 4— EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of an), proposed StrUCIUTe(s), not including antennas; what the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 65 61 �?o, 1-, 6. 60VII A57 SUL b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Alb C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: lk�/I ( C ;771 Al� a -,,p - V77.4-6 1. Light and Clare el What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly a. occur? A,/oA.,6— b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safely hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off —site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: luell, 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. SA,d I 'T TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or ap�licant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Presery-ation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation recvisicrs known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. b. Generally desicribe any land'marks or evidence of . historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. /4-/OA,10� C. P70D0SCd MCC —SUMS 10 reduce or control impacts. if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on �ite �Ians. if any. DAVIVN b. Is site currently served by public transit'? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop'? A-3 I D i-o C c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have'? How many 6( A/ 4,4,4�\ 19q, Ab-bowM/h, VC—Ac W5 /, "� i- CO woVid the IqUPC AL c- C/ project eliminate'? / Mb I P0,4x4-L, Y%41 C,, I- 5-_A4C(J_ d. Will the proposal require any ne\v roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets. not includina driveways'? If �o. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). v&o e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail, or air transporta- Lion? It" so, ocneralIv describe. 0 I-d f. How many vehicular trips per day would be venerated by the completed project'! If known. indicate when peak volumes would occur. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a C6t-1t_,_1 n 41 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, gencrally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities t a. Circi�F-u-tili-ties-curr—c-n-tly--aN,�ilable� at the site natural gas water, efuse serV- ice ptic system, otaii-ISID, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the -eneral construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Ap" P 7� A- 6- A-107- 19 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and O)pletiit th bestof mN owled e. I understand that )n t 0 M itrdecis* the lead agency is relying ( , 2E. & N" Signature: .............. ........ ................. .................. 711L� 1.5 /. Date Submitted: .................. ..... .... ................. -10- .5 To III: COMPI-IJED BY Al'I'LICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY SUPPLEMENTAL SilHET FOR NoNPROJECT ACTION'S (Rezones, Code Changess Annexations, etc-) ((10 r101 use IldS sheet for project actions) BeCause these questioils are very general, it may be helpful to read llieni in conjunction With tile list or the elements 01"the When answering these C111CS6011S. be aware of tile extent tile prOpOSal, or IhC.IyPCS Of oposal, would*uffect tile itern at I greater intensity or ictivities likely to result froill tilt 1*)rL -it I faster rate thian if tile proposal were not implemented, Respond briefly and in general lerlils. 1. How would tile proposal be likely to increase discharge 10 waler; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release ol' toxic or hazardows substances; or production of noise? .A10 (' 14j-) Al 6wr Proposed nicasures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? /4v/o e A/4 /,.&� 0 Proposed nicasures to protect or conserve plants, animals, rish, or marine life are: �A/a& V 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources'? /1/,j 0 /+q)L�— Proposed mensures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: I 4. Flow would tile proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas desigimied (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; SLIC11 as parks, wil- dcriwis, Wild and scenic rivers, threatened or ellil:111gere(l species imbitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, I'loodpl.ains, or prime farmlands'? A/D Proposed mensiires to protect such resources or to ',IYOid or reduce impacts are: A-16- 5. 11my wolliti tile proposal be likely to affect land ;Intl shoreline wie, inclu ' (ling wilether it would zillow or encourage land or shoreline uses illcolllp�itihle with existing plalls'? '/vzI C NALZ4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid oT reduce sI orcline and land use impacts are: A101-Ir- 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? A10 Proposed measures to reduce OT respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. AA) 0-� )./ F7- / C j— M I 0 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER LIST PLEASE LIST ALL STREET ADDRESSES OF RESIDENTS OF PROPERTY WITHIN -SO FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE SITE. ALSO LIST NAMES AND MAILING ADDRESSES OF OWNERS OF THESE SAME PROPERTIES. (THIS INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY ASSESSOR S OFFICE.,) . .... . ....... b mo o lr-m4m J., TOO M' ps a "D ^3 AA. V. t I'E 8A .131 'cj�motjn WA - A L AP-r S L., t) Cc L- REM, v\X-s f 5 "Vq I . L --- AAA .. RALPA &. BLLLt-vulL v4A 6) P SEASCAPE CONDOS 626 Main St Edmonds, WA 98020 #1 Lilly Sterling #2 Agnes Sammerseth #3 Harold & Gloria Kelly #4 William 0 Ruff #5 Georgianna Keldog #6 Engle Hector #7 William Ruff #8 Stanley Hovik #9 Maxine Johnson #10 Hans & Ruth Schonenberg #11 Ada Elmore #12 Charli�s & Nona Curry 'N Resident/Owner Edward J. Thompson Resident/Owner 628 Dayton St. 829 Poplar Way, 620 Dayton St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Ronald Walker, Jr. Stanley Hovik/Resident 22906 Park Road 626 Main St. #8 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Warren LaFon Maxine Johnson/Resident 111 Durbin Dr. 626 Main St. #9 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Lilly Sterling/Resident Hans & Ruth Schonenberg/ 626 Main Street #1 Resident Edmonds, WA 98020 626 Main St. . 1/10 Edmonds, WA 98020 Agnes Sammerseth/Resident Ada Elmore/Resident 626 Main Street #2 626 Main Street #11 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Harold & Gloria Kelly/Res. Charles & Nona Curry/Res. 626 Main Street #3 626 Main Street #12 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 William Ruff/Resident Edmonds Library 626 Main Street #4 Attn: K. Turner Edmonds, WA. 98020 650 Main Street .Edmonds, WA 98020 GeorgianraKellog/Resident Resident/Owner 626 Main Street #5 630 Main St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Engle Hector/Resident Robert A. Mulie 626 Main Street #6 P.O. Box 133 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 William Ruff/Resident Resident/Owner 626 Main Street #7 115 Durbin Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 9tE86 VM 'UO4SBULN ELL X09 .0. d @UL4u@LPA -V S@WPP Resident 617 Dayton St. #1. Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 617 Dayton St. #2 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 617 Dayton St. #3 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 617 Dayton St. #4 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 617 Dayton St. #5 Edmonds, WA 98020 Resident 617 Dayton St. #6 Edmonds , WA 98020 Resident 617 Dayton wt. #7 Edmonds, WA 98020 Great West Savings Ral ph G. Peterson #51140145 11201 S.E. 8th Bellevue, WA '98009 Erma Perrine/Resident 636 Dayton St. Edmonds , WA 98020 OZO86 VM 'SPUOWP3 qaajqS uoqfiPo tL9 J@uMO/4u@Ns@'d CU-28-86 CONDIT*IONAL'USE PERMIT FOR ADDITION TO -EXISTING PROFESSIONAL BUILDING IN MULTIFAMILY ZONE AT'.627 DAYTON.-.STREET (RM-1.5) V-22-86 VARIANCE TT -ALLOW EIGHT PARKING -SPACES INSTEAD OF CODE REQUIRED NINE PARKING'SPACES FOR.PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ADDITION AT 627 DAYTON STREET (RM-1.5 HEARING DATE: *.AUGUST 7, 1986 PLEASE RESPOND'WITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER.THAN JULY 25, 1986. RrCEIVE0 THANKS. R EC E I V �E -D :,JUL 2 4 C OF E ITY 6111%11�;,:i�zri., Lim I r_ SUBJECT CU-28-86 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADDITION TO EXISTING PROFESSIONAL BUILDING IN MULTIFAMILY ZONE AT-627 DAYTON.-.STREET (RM-1.5) V-22-86 VARIANCE TO'.ALLOW EIGHT PARKING. -SPACES INSTEAD OF CODE REQUIRED NINE PARKING SPACES FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ADDITION AT 627 DAYTON STREET (RM-1.5�) HEARING DATE: '.AUGUST 7, 1986 PLEASE RESPOND'WIIH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER -THAN JULY 25, 1986. THANKS. RECEIVED JUL 21 '1986 ENGINEERINO 1 .1 - L: F?ECEIVED D City of Edmol, S JUL 2 3'1986 �Cary McComas Fire Mars C171Y OF EDMO Bobby Mills P,.W..,.' INTER -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE NDS Dan Smith/Jerry Hauth'-` ngineering Duane Bowman July 21, 1986 TO 'FROM DATE SUBJECT CU-28-86 CONDITIONAL'USE PERMIT FOR ADDITION TO EXISTING PROFESSIONAL BUILDING IN MULTIFAMILY ZONE AT'.627 DAYTON�-STREET (RM-1.5) V-22-86 VARIANCE TO' -ALLOW EIGHT PARKING. -SPACES INSTEAD OF CODE REQUIRED NINE PARKING SPACES FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ADDITION AT 627 DAYTON STREET (RM-1 HEARING DATE: '.AUGUST 7, 1986 PLEASE RESPOND'W'ITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER -THAN JULY 25, 1986. THANKS. V, -, b i Q0 ?2 E K: e� �-, 0, � - z! 2 5;- (� 0 -� �_W, - f-, Q � S NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TH . E HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING THURSDAY, AUGUST 7, 19 86 ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO. �U-28-86 & V-22-U CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OFFICE ADDITION. VARIANCE TO REDUCE REQUIRED PARKING BY ONE SPACES 627 DAYTON STREET PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION ZONE DISTRICT RM-1.5 THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT- 7:30 P M., IN THE PLAZA MEETING ROOM, LIBRARY BUILDING, 650 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER. IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY AT THE MEETING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS (PHONE 771-3202, EXTENSION 252). THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE WARNING OF THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. AUGUST 7, 1986 THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER maccu FILE NO. CU-28-86 APPLICANT Ronald Walker, Jr. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH Susan Painter being first duly sworn, on oath depose�, and says: That on the 28th day of July 19 86 the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. S i g n e d Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 My COMMISSION EXPIRES 646-89. I .-s AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) FILE NO. CU-28-86 APPLICANT Ronald Walker, Jr. Duane Bowman being first duly sworn, on oath, deposes and says: 28th July 86 That on the day of 19 the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Frances Anderson Center and Civic Center, and where applicable on or near the subject property. Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 dw Notary Public in and for t11,'6',.,Sta Washington. Residing at My COMMISSION EXPIRES 6-16-89- THIS PACKET SENT TO HEARING EXAMINER ON AUGUST 1, 1986 EXHIBIT LIST CU-28-86 & V-22-86 EXHIBIT I - STAFF RE ,poRT EXHIBIT 2 - AppLICATIONS/DECLARATIONS, EXHIBIT 3 - SITE pLAN EXHIBIT 4 - DECIARATION OF NoNSIGNIr ICANCE W EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAM= FILES: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 HEARING DATE: August 7, 1986 I. REQUESTED ACTION: Variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces by one and a conditional use permit for an office addition 'at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds. Conditional use permit for professional office addition at 637 Dayton Street, Edmonds. II. APPLICANVOWNER: Ronald Walker, Jr. 22906 Park Road Edmonds, WA 98020 III. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit 2 IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: A. DescriDtion of the Sublect Prorertv and Surroundina Area The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Durbin Street and Dayton Streets. The lot contains approximately 9,900 sq. ft. of area. The site is developed into one large office building (Building A) and a smaller office building (Building B)in the northwest corner of the lot. These two offices were allowed under CU-44-79 and CU-40-80. The Applicant is seeking a conditional use permit to add 574 sq. ft. of office area onto Building A. In addition to the conditional use permit, the Applicant is seeking a variance to reduce the total required number of parking spaces from nine to eight spaces. Surrounding developuent, is a mixture of single family and multiple family residential uses. The Edmonds public library is located directly east, across Durbin Street. B. Official Street Map Proposed R/W Existing R/W .1 Staff Report V-22-86 & CU-28-86 OA East - Durbin Street 60' 60' South - Dayton Street 60' 60' North - Alley 15' 15' C. Conformance to Chapter 20.05 & Chapter 20.85.01�0 1. Special Circiunstances Special circumstances do appear to exist in this particular case. The lot slopes east to�west and in order to add the additional one parking stall would man the removal of the Apple tree and lawn area behind Building A. 2. Special Pr'vileqe The proposed variance does not appear to represent a grant of special privilege. 3. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Policy Plan map designates subject property and surrounding area as Low Density Residential and High Density Residential�. The proposed variance, does not appear t o conflict with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Zoning Ordinance The subject property, as well as the surrounding area, is zoned RM -1.5. The proposed variance does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the zoning ordinance or the RM-1.5 zone district. 5. Not Detrimental The proposed variance does not appear significant impact to the public or to private property or iinprovement. 6. Minimum Variance The requested variance does appear to minimum variance request. pose any y near by sent a Staff Report V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 3 7. Transferabil The conditional use permit should be transferable. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recam-endation of the staff that CU-28-86 and V-22-86 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Comply with Architectural Design Board requirexnents. 2. The Applicant shall file a covenant, approved as to form by the City Attorney, that states that, in the event of a resulting parking problem, the one parking stall shall be installed or if the City amends its Community DeveloFmeent Code to allow payment of money into the in -lieu parking fund offices in RM zones, whichever comes first.. 1 .1 PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM AND/OR WISH TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S FINDINGS OF FACT CU-28-86 RONALD WAL�ER, JR. V-22-86 Conditional use permit for professional office addition and variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 9 to 8 at 627 Dayton Street. NAM ADDRESS tit Af RECEIV- CITY OF EDMONDS' 250 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF RONALD WALKER, JR. FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DECISION: The variance and conditional use permit as requested are granted subjec-%"- to conditicns listed. INTRODUCTION AUG 2 8 1960 Li. i OF EDMONL.,, LARRY S. NALIGHTEN MAYOR FILE: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Ronald Walker, Jr., 22906 Park Road, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, ' and hereinafter referred to as Applicant, has requested approval of a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces at a profes- sional office at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. In addition the Applicant has requested a conditional use permit for the allowance of an addition to a professional office at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. A hearing on -the request was held before the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds on August 7, 1986. At the hearing the following pre- sented testimony and evidence: Mary Lou Block Warren LaFon Edmonds Planning Dept. 111 Durbin Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 At the hearing the following exhibits were submitted and admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: Exhibit 1 - Staff Report if 2 - Applications/beclarations 3 - Site Plan 4 - Declaration of Nonsignificance After due consideration of the evidence presented by the Applicant; evidence elicited during the public hearing; and, as a result of the personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding areas by the Hearing Examiner, the following Findings of Fact and . Conclusions constitute the basis of tho-decision of the Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Applicant has requested approval of a variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces at property . located at 627 Dayton Findings and decision of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds Re: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 2 Street, Edmonds, Washington. The request is to reduce the required number of parking spaces by one. In addition, Applicant has requested a conditional use permit for the allowance of an addition to a pro- fessional office at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. 2. The subject property is located on ' the Northwest corner of Durbin Street and Dayton Street. It is a lot of approximately 9,900 square feet. The lot is developed with two office buildings. .(Staff report) 3. The subject property is zoned RM-1.5. Two office buildings.were de- veloped pursuant to conditional use permits issued in 1979 and 1980. (Staff report) 4. It is the intent of the Appl'icant to construct an additional 574 square feet of office area onto Building A. it is for this addition that the Applicant seeks a conditional use permit. (Block testimony) 5. With the proposed addition to office A the zoning code of the City of Edmonds requires that an Applicant have nine parking spaces. The Applicant is'seeking a variance from this requirement and proposes eight parking spaces. .(Block testimony) 6. In order for a conditional use permit to be granted within the City of Edmonds, the criteria as set forth in Section 20.05-010 (ECDC) must be satisfied. These criteria include: A. The proposed use must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed use and its location must be consistent with the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the zone district in which the use is located and the proposed use must meet all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance. C. The proposed use must not significantly be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare nor to nearby private proper- ties or improvements. (ECDC) 7. In order for a variance to be granted within the City of Edmonds, the criteria as set forth in Section 20.85.010 must be satisfied. These criteria include: A. Because of the special circumstances relating to the property, the strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and privileges -permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. B. The approval of a Variance would not be a grant of special privileges to the property in comparision with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. C. The approval of a variance will be consistent with the Comp- rehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds. Findings and decision of the Hearing Examiner of -the City of Edmonds Re: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 3 D. The.approval of the variance will be consistent with the pur- poses of the zoning ordinance and the zone district in which the property is located. E. The variance as approved or conditionally approved will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and'same zone. F. The requested variance is the minimum necessary to allow the owner the rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. (ECDC) 6. The Applicant intends to use the additional space in building as a conference room. Also, offices within the office building will be redesigned for better use of available space. There will be no additional personnel retained as a result of the proposed ex- pansion. (LaFon testimony) 7. Parking standards within the City of Edmonds req uire that the size of Building A have at least nine parking spaces. The Ap- plicant is proposing eight spaces. If a ninth space were developed the parking stall * would result in the removal of an apple tree and lawn area that is located behind Building A. However, because no additional personnel are proposed to be employed at the site, there appears to be no need for additional parking. (Staff report, LaFon testimony) 8. The proposed variance will not be the grant of a special privilege. (Staff report) 9. The comprehensive Policy Plan Map of the City of Edmonds designates the subject property as low density residential and high density residential. The requested variance does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 10. The proposed variance does not impact the public nor other private properties or improvements in the area. 11. The requested variance for the reduction of parking stalls does represent a minimum variance request. 12. The requested conditional use permit should be transferrable. 13. The Planning Departmen'�_'of -the City of Edmonds has recommended approval of the conditional use permit and variance subject to the following conditions: 1. comply with architectural design board requirements. r T Findings and decision of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds Re: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 4 2. The Applicant shall file a covenant, approved as to form by the City Attorney, that states that, in the event of a resulting parking problem, the one parking stall shall be installed or, if the city amends its community developement code to allow payment of money into the in -lieu parking fund offices in RM zones, whichever comes first. (Staff report) 14. The City submitt ed that the Applicant was willing to buy a parking stall and participate in the parking fund program. However, because the subject property was located in a residential zone, the property does not qualify for the parking fund program. Condition No. 2 of the city's recommendation allows for participation should offices in Rm zone be included as part of the program. (Block testimony) 15. No adverse testimony was received in this matter. CONCLUSION 1. The application is for the approval of a conditional use permit for the addition of 574 square feet of office area on a building located at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. Requested variance is for a reduction of the required parking spaces of nine for the parking lot that is adjacent to the building. The requested reduction is for the allowance of eight spaces. 2. The requested variance satisfies the criteria as set forth in Section 20.85-010. exist for the granting of the variance. 3. Special circumstances ase in the number of employees on Because there will be no incre 1 parking space will require removal site and because the additiona of lawn area and an apple tree, special circumstances exist for the granting of this variance. 4. The granting of a.variance is not a special privilege. 5. The granting of a variance is consistent with the comprehensive policy plan map designation of the subject property and also the zoning destination of the subject property: The requested variance is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinances of the City of Edmonds. 6. The requested variance is not detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, nor to nearby private properties or improve- ments. 7. The requested variance is the minimum necessary for the Applicant to enjoy the property. 8. . The requested conditional use permit satisfies the criteria of Section 20.05.010. (ECDC) Findings and decision of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds Re: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 5 9. As noted the requested variance is consistent with the zoning ordinances of the City of Edmonds and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds. 10. The conditional use permit would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, nor to nearby private properties or improvements. 11. The conditional use permit should be transferrable. I DECISION Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions; the testi- m I ony and evidence submitted at the public hearing, and upon the impres sions of the Hearing Examiner at a site view, it is hereby ordered that a conditional use permit for the allowance of an additional 574 square feet to be added on to building A at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washing- ton, is granted. Also a variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces from nine to eight for the parking lot at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington, is granted. Both the variance and the conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant is to comply with all architectural design board requirements. 2. The Applicant shall file a covenant that is to be approved as to form by the City'Attorney. The covenant shall state that in the event of a parking problem onsite, the Applicant shall provide an additional stall onsite. If at the time the parking stall is needed and the City has.amended its Community Development Code to allow offices in an RM zone to be part of the parking fund that is made available in7lieu of construction of parking, the Applicants may elect to do so. 3. The Applic ant shall secure all necessary permits prior to com- mencing any construction. DONE AND DATED -this Z�;__day of August, 1986. JES M. DRISCOLL Haring Examiner NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Written appeals alleging sp"ecific error of fact or other grounds for appeal may be filed with the,Planning Department, City of Edmonds, civic Center, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, within fourteen days of the date of the Hearing Examiner's final action. In this matter any appeal must be received by the Department prior to 5:00 P.M. on September 8, 1986. 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 2300 WESTIN BUILDING, 2001 SIXTH AVENUE * SEATTLE, WA 98121 (206) 448-4000 CITY ATTORNEY September 8, 1986 LARRY S. NALIGHTEN MAYOR TO: Duane Bowman Planning Department City of Edmonds FROM: Scott Snyder Office of the City Attorney RE: Ron Walker V-22-86 and CU-28-86 After reviewing the covenant proposed by Dick Walker at Perkins, Coie, I recommend that the following language be added in the second paragraph of the covenant: Shall within thirty (30) days of written notification from the City of Edmonds that an on -site parking problem exists ... I have reviewed this language with Dick Walker, Ron Walker's brother and attorney, who is to insert this language in the covenant prior to its being signed. If you have any questions in this regard, please contact me. Mr. Walker is to provide a corrected covenant to you. WSS/naa INCORPORATED AUGUST 11, IBSO I IN THE MATTER OF T1( APPLICATION FILE:( 22-86 CU-28-86 OF RONALD WALKER, Jx�.- FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE AND A CONDITIONAL 0,3 4 7 USE PERMIT COVENANT Jr., 22906 Park Road, The undersigned, Ronald P. Walker, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (hereinafter referred to as $,J�pplicant"), requested and was granted approval by the City of Edmonds of a conditional use permit for an addition to a professional office building at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington, and a variance to reduce by one the number of required parking spaces at such address, subject to certain conditions, including a covenant approved as to form by the City Attorney of Edmonds. In furtherance of such approval for a variance and conditional use permit, Applicant hereby covenants that upon 30 days' written notice from the City of Edmonds of an on site parking problem at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, and subject to rights of appeal, Applicant shall provide one additional on site parking stall at such address. It is further understood that if at such time a parking stall is needed the City Of Edmonds has amended its Community Development Code to allow offices in an RM zone to be part of the parking fund available in -lieu of construction of parking, that Applicant may elect to participate in such parking fund. 0 DATED as of this day of September, 1986. 4V Ronald P. Wdlker, Jr. Applicant STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH On this day personally appeared before me Ronald P. W Tri Jr., to me known to be the individual described in and w 1-0 executed the within and foregoing i . nstrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of 19 -�T,,- LJ _-,' r 7 T d)for th6 NO ARY PUBLI8�,_ n ad State of Washing,ton, residing at Approved as to form this ID day of September, 1986, CITY OF EDMONDS By Title 0 -'U 0 FTJ C3 �e -s t i-n- 'B-u'i 1 d i n g" 2001 6th Avenue, Suite #2300 Seattle, Washington 98121 Dear Scott: I am enclosing a signed and notarized Covenant for approval as required in granting the City of Edmonds variance for parking. My brother indicated you had called him and suggested a 30-day notice be included. The wording enclosed includes the 30-day notice. I am not sure who signs on behalf of the City of Edmonds, however, I wish to retain one signed copy. If you are to forward this on, please have someone return to me a signed copy in the envelope provided. RW/jd encl. Sincere yours, Y- Z Ron ;alker lu L--w z 1j OF R EL; El V ED LAW OFFICES OGDEN, OGDEN, MURPHY & WALLACE 2300 WESTIN BUILDING SEP 1986 2001 SIXTH AVENUE J:� SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 96121 CITY OF EDMOND.$ (206) 448-4000 MEMORANDUM OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 1986 TO: Duane Bowman City of Edmonds RE: Ron Walker Covenant ENCLOSED: Covenant approved for recordation with Snohomish County. Copy previously returned to Walker. Documents (extra) enclosed for your file. OGDEN, OGDEN, MURPHY & WALLACE B Y. W. Scott Snyder naa NNW! OPAQIFICJNTERNATIONAL� September 22, 1986 Snohomish County Auditor Department IIRII 3000 Rockefeller Everett, Washington 98201 Gentlemen: I am enclosing two signed copies of a covenant we wish to have recorded. I am enclosing $5 for this one page document and ask that you send one stamped copy to City of Edmonds, attention Duane V. Bowman Asgistant City Planner in the stamped envelope provided and the other stamped copy to me in the second self addressed stamped envelope. Sincerely yours, Ronald Walker, Jr. RW/jd encl. cc: '/Duane V. Bowman City of Edmonds P. 0. Box C-2007 627 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 771-8988