The URL can be used to link to this page

627 DAYTON ST (3).pdf�-4 1 t dwo k .E X W B T 2.1 CITY OF EDMONDS HEARING EXAMINER FIL,, 2- z -86 DATE FEE--- /,Sc), 00 RECT # 5 9 1-7 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE APO'S 117 (1 HEARING DATE: APPLICANT 0 P K14LKg-a, ip —ADDRESS-,.,—,',',?-22(:2 4�jje)Q-- CITY & ZIP o.�i 6-S W4 <�?,Ye-2 Zo PHONE- �,74 1351 INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 627 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lo-)5 3) ) 32-.11- 33 AAI-�) )4C 1�45T rv(- 10 Ove (-f-e S - OF —1?-k AL�ZP-1 Ll- 67 1t'L3-L-t-T OF L-)7- 3 &,CV- 7 �7 P / A 7 0)' '-7 A�-y Ct TV o r' a /M 0,V 6 S VARIANCE REQUESTED: /A/ 0/2,� Z4VIAI e,7 '-c, PAi7d. (:�t, A; 1,RPb5cn11 P1* FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: USE ZONE: ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: Release/Hold Harmless Agreement The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from any action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. Permission to Enter Subject Property The undersigned applicant grants his, her or.its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmon,�-� to enter.the subject pr6perty for the purpose of inspection and posting aytetidant ;�,o t�is /pl4atiion'. Sib,nature 'of Applicant, Owner or L Representative DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT Please answer all questions 1. What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? V 41V bul-sl-1 7z) li-il4l t, tA.1 2. How does your property differ from other property in the same vicinity? f&,&S: e2l<> 23 3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? A/0 lkto&,� /7A[— 6' 5eA rp 4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted? Will these hardships have been caused by your own action? ATE-0- /-72LJ-Lj- 71 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? �Z(ILI& 15A.; 7 AP- d 6 (- /Vi�&d � 012- 7�k- A16161-1-8oR.S 3 DURBIN DRIVE Addition to Pacif ic Insurance Underwriters 110.0, F- MF�H'j Building F�--� 0 clq\5 UIE) &2--7 PAY-rbN '5-rP-� L 4.1 DalWN6 A n N 67 --rWO t>TOPY WCOC) rpAtle 49ZC2 Cr. Of Oma wrn� U) -rvo s-T,,py mP6,>jf�,y A7qc) woo() W 0 AF-CA- 0 3 z 7TI t16 (n X All W +1. 0 PI, Ct) t-OPMON 6=� 11 K SITE PI.AN 3: X Uj WARREN LAFON FP-o Po-5f-70 AMrnc1,v Of:FjC,6 ACf)rr1Or1j 5-/ TO A i N,67 rizo -ro So njou-,- --,-Tp-ev-T -rptr.-- AT &A-5F, C-TYPICA-L, C"f 5) E�?C r,-n 16 R.AT� 1�jDIC,,,s,va L, Av\/ t-J EXHIBIT 4- FILE fi—CU-23-afi DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Conditional Use Permit for Professional Office Additi n Proponent Ronald Walker, Jr Location of proposal, including street address, if any 627 Dayton Street Lead agency Edmonds Planning Department The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a prob- able significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decisi'on was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on ffle with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for thi's DNS. This DNS i's issued under 197-11-340(.2); the lead agency will not act. on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible official Duane V. Bowman Position/title- Assistant City Planner Phone 771-3202, ext 254 Address 250 5th Ave. N. Edmo Date July 29, 1986 Signature Y IF _X/ Y o u may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to at 250 5th Ave, N., Fdmnndq,_WA qRngn no later than 5eQO p-m.. Aumio-__91 1986 by filing written appeal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact — Duane Bowman to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. !V L:A�7 There is no agency appeal. Tu ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose or Checklist: The S121C Environnicrital Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCIA1. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal bnforc making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality Of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to �clp you and the apency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from thc'proposal. if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks Vou to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental anen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant., requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. - and careful ly, to the best or your kno . wledge. In most cases, you should You must answer each question accurate]\ 0 be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you real]v do not know the ans'wcr, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap- P131 , , Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. %, Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Ans\ er assist you. these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can I riod of time or oil The check -list questions ap�ly to all parts of your p-roposal, even if you plan to do them over a pe different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you sibmil. this checklist may ask you to explain you; answers or provide additional in - impact. formation reasonably related to determining if there may be signiFicant adverse Use or checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN AD- DITION., complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer." and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: SM OA/6 / , 11X yf J W4 �BQLLW,Q& A-61SIPO/') *'017 D/1- 2. Name of applicant: PO.V,9 L6 /P Wiz- )e6�z_ 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: /-),o jt:� lr_�011-b E5A 4110.A-1,6SI 6 4. Date checklist prepared: 7_U_-y / Y 1�04 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ,5/ x ove 4e-/ &/�r /,�i oAlPt5 1-7,eb 2-e� 7. Do you have any plans for future addiLions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Phs 1�721n d- I -A -ill be prepared, directly related to S. List any environmental inrorma-,.,n you know about that has been prepared, this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications arc pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? ir yes, explain. Ad I 10. List any government. 'approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 1. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including, the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There arc several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infOT- mation on project description.) '-V z13 C"/ t__'6 A"I — /� 5PI c o /TU TS L 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the sitc(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. \Vhile. you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted %vith any permit applications related to this checklist. 627 b,,� V;rl)AJ (2 e-J-7-- 25� "*kl C TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELENiENITS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one . CFla)tolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? P0 57ZOJ>�!- EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 0 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCy USE ONLY c. What general types of soils arc found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, pcal, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. J1q A/6 u/ d. Arc there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. /V0 c. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate source of fill. /t,/o f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use'? If so. neneraliv describe. AIZ) a .. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? A/C c W 1AJ1,,t_r 7U -4 5PAtC7- 4A, Y h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacis to the earth, if any: 1�x2A, cr 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any. generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. //V0 114 1 's b. Are there any off —site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal'? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: /*t/UA,JJJ_ 5 I TO BL COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR 3. Water AGENCY USE ONLY a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface waieT body on or in the immediate vicinity or the site (including vear—round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it nows into. /tl- 0 2) \Vill the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please des.cribe and attach available plans. I # /\_/0 - 3) Ektimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. ,/VO/(,. tr- 4) %Vill the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- i i scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. /tzo 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100—year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 11111d 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the iype of waste and anticipated volunic of discharge. A/'61 b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. A-0 % 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sc\vage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the sysicill, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systern(s) are. expected to serve. ,e4la (?Hil A,, 6-C k TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source or runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water now into other waters? If so, describe. / -A4k,&LT- 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. IVO 7V- Mea -S EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A &J41A/ CYL,/-j 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vcgctation round on the site: ,,"deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspcn, other --�evergrcen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other -'shrubs ,-'-cyrass — pasture — crop or grain — wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other — water plants: water lily, celgrass, milroil, other .--'other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount or vegetation will be removed or altered? OA"�- L/ S�VMcr Y/f "LA 612.1ts -r, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. A/c) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance VegeLation on the site, if any: 5� '; 8--% 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been'observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: i.d�._hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: .................................. *mammals: deer, bear, elk, bcaver, other: ........... fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: .... b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 'Alu,%, d- -5- 0 c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: A, C 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of cnergY (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet C* v 1� I the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, P rally describe. ene c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 6VI A/ 1,V 0 O"Z- 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. AVO I) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short—term or a long—term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. JD4N, -1 AA L! TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: A/6 �— A, co'aoBc (in, 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of.vhc site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been uscd'for agriculture? If so, describe. A"'o c. Describe any structures on the site. C) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? &(- I- '-)I &- 6- ,Alb EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. What is the current zonina classification of the site? IR AA f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? P, A/A g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? MA.) h. Has an part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, y specify. i. Approximately how many people would re,�ide or work in �he completed project? 0,11AIK CAA-Ce %67h';v I-V A4— 3PP- t V14V 044�ccq j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace'? lvalvLf' k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is Compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: A.& /-�; 48)7- -7— 1 k TO 111: COMPLETED BY AVPLICAI�T 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- d1c, or low-income housing. -0— b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of an), proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? /�6 ;r?,),., iI5 P) eozvu PA-C15 e--� L�X-,V-At" 'TL" /512- 19Xt5-1'--'X6 ALIt 60-0- b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? A/() .4, d- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: /.�b /� ? / A-11 ( c "T- A-r, M."trw Alo^- Al� d3e',-i- c-:;LV77,L&- 1. Liaht and Clare "Alhat type of light or Qlare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly a. occur? J— b. Could light or glare from the Finished project be a safciN- hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities arc in the immediate vicinity? /- / &W� b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. M-Z a r 1, . �Oj A— TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to bc provided by the project or apblicant, if any: Moe,- 13— I 13. Historic and Cultural Presery'ation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. A/0 b. Generally desicribe any landmarks or evidence o( historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. MOA�_r c. Pr000sed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: //o /4- 6, 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposcd access to the existiniz street system. Show on site plans. if any. D/,V b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? �/(-,'3 1 .9 L-0 C c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have'? Flow many woVJd_Lhe project eliminate'? Alb-hp-NAllh— V&M C d5 /t, Ve) L AAL-7.� A, X-i!X tK),PC AL L /14-,nfr�u_ 5-p4cd- d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets. not includina drive%va\s? 11' so. 1-lenerally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity or) water, rail. or air transporta- tion? If so, ocneraliv describe. f. How mativ vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project'! If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY QUL%l n k I TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 1-10"-a- 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generafly describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Alo"(r 16. Utilities --�rea-usc �Scr�'7 e _Curre-011-37-arr-�Hlable at the a. OrCIT-U-T elect )CI natural gas r se%ve _r' e " - �se%ver, ptic system, otli site e , a ice, elepho C �njitar�e — An b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the -eneral construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which miaht 0 t:�� be needed. A, 6, "0 7- 19 LR C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and, �6)plcte to. th b �t of mN 1, owled c. I understand that (95, � . the lead agency is relying on t it 'ecis NOV nc0 ii Signature: .............. .......... ........... TLIL� ..... /.5 .... /. ................. Date Submitted: ................. " 4 _10- EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO III: CON114-WHA) 11V APPLICANT N EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. S0111-1.1;NIENTAL SIII:I:T FOK NONI'ItOJECT A('Tlotqs (Rezones, Code Changes� Annexations, etc.) (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these ques6ons are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction witi, ow list or tile elements of tile When answering these questions, be aware of [lie extent the proposal, or Ilic.lypes of activities a 1, -ould'uffect tile itern at a greater intensity or likely to result from Oit propos, and in general 'OPOS' al a faster rale th.an if tile P, al were not implemcnied. Respond briefly terms. 1. How would tile proposal be likely to ilicrease discharge to waler; emissions to air, pro- duction, storage, or release ol* toxic or hazarelotis substances; or production of noise? A/0 141A Al 6w` Proposed meastires to avoid or rechice soch increases are: 2 3 Flow would tile proposal be likely to ;,free, phinis, anirrials, rish, or marine life? /Vo C 141) /-&�- A Proposed nicasures to protect or conserve phints, aninials, fish, or marine life are: .IV 0 "'�_ lj� l-low would the proposal be likely to deplele energy or imiur.al resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and rmitiral resourCeS are: /v0-1'/U- 4. How Nyould the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas oe ar- eas designated (or eligible or mider study) for governmental protection; Such as parks, wil- derncss, wild lod scenic rivers, threatened or endangered Species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wellands, 11cloilplains, or prime rarmlaildi? /V:) 0)71 1 A- 611C Proposed mensures tri protect such resourcei or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 6- S. I 10W WMIld the proposal be likely to iffect land and shoreline tiNe, inclu ' ding whether it would allow or C11COtmige land or shoreline uses illcof"P-3tible With existing plans? k M 0 TO HE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts arc: 6. H ow would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? C 41 Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) arc: 7. Identify, if possible, -whethcr the proposal may connict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. /VC) C 4 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY ....... ...... Resident/Owner Edward J. Th-ompson Resident/Owner 628 Dayton St. 829 Poplar Way. 620 Dayton St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Ronald Walker, Jr. Stanley Hovik/Resident Resident 22906 Park Road 626 Main St. #8 617 Dayton St. #1 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Warren LaFon Maxine Johnson/Resident Resident III Durbin Dr. 626 Main St. #9 617 Dayton St. #2 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Lilly Sterling/Resident Hans & Ruth Schonenberg/ Resident 626 Main Street #1 Resident 617 Dayton St. #3 Edmonds, WA 98020 626 Main St. #10 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Agnes Sammerseth/Resident Ada Elmore/Resident Resident 626 Main Street #2 626 Main Street #11 617 Dayton St. #4 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Harold & Gloria Kelly/Res. Charles & Nona Curry/Res. Resident 626 Main Street #3 626 Main Street #12 617 Dayton St. #5 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 William Ruff/Resident Edmonds Library Resident 626 Main Street #4 Attn: -K. Turner 617 Dayton St. #6 Edmonds, WA. 98020 650 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds , WA 98020 GeorgianraKellog/Resident Resident/Owner Resident 626 Main Street #5 630 Main St. 617 Dayton wt. #7 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Engle Hector/Resident Robert A. Mulie Great West Savings Ralph G. Peterson 626 Main Street #6 P.O. Box 133 #51140145 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 11201 S.E. 8th Bellevue, WA 98009 William Ruf f / Res i dent Resident/Owner Erma Perrine/Resident 636 Dayton St. 626 Main Street #7 115 Durbin Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmon'ds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 9tC86 VM 'UO4SBUL� OE086 VM 'SPUOWP3 .ELL X09 .0. d, qa@,Aqs uoqfiea tL9 -V S@WPC`-- J@UMO/4u@p�s@� @UL4u@LPA I E 4 SEASCAPE CONDOS 626 Main St Edmonds, WA 98020 1/1 Lilly Sterling #2 Agnos Sammerseth #3 Harold & Gloria Kelly #4 William 0 Ruff #5 Georgianna Keldog #6 Engle Hector #7 William Ruff #8 Stanley Hovik #9 Maxine Johnson #10 Hans & Ruth Schonenberg #11 Ada Elmore #12 Charl6s & Nona Curry ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER LIST PLEASE LIST ALL STREET ADDRESSES OF RESIDENTS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 80 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE SITE. ALSO LIST NAMES AND MAILING ADDRESSES OF OWNERS OF THESE SAME PROPERTIES, (THIS INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY ASSESSOR I S OFFICE'l' IF A BANK IS LISTED AS'OWNERj PLEASE INCLUDE LOAN NUMBER NEXT TO INDIVIDUAL S NAME.) f) 1% 0 A, EM%bm'�5 WA q8VZD 0. Sn 131 VA LEM �otjb 5 WA - P. o'* soy� A Kf k6';'5'fbN WA q934b C A F- t, L - CLO AJ-b D .......... L -b.YT APT 'S L t� Cr WA- 2L AAA 4 L WA --BLLLf-vU�- i CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TH . E- HEARING EXAMINER -WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING THURSDAY, AUGUST 7, 19 86 ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO. CU-28-86 & V-22-�6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OFFICE ADDITION. VARIANCE TO REDUCE REQUIRED PARKING BY ONE SPACEI PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION 627 DAYTON STREET ZONE DISTRICT Rm-1,5 THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT 7:30 P-M., IN THE PLAZA MEETING ROOM, LIBRARY BUILDING, 650 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER. IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY AT THE MEETING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS (PHONE 771-3202, EXTENSION 252). THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION OR CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE WARNING! OF THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. AUGUST 7, 1986 THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER vt,,5z( It- v),�01-'s-Q-c-i -7/ 1 20�6 k AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH FILE NO. APPLICANT V-22-86 Ronald Walker, Jr. —Duane Bowman being first duly sworn, on oath, deposes and says: That on the 28th day of July 19 86, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Frances Anderson Center and Civic Center, and where applicable on or near the subject property. Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1 9J� . 4(l WF Notary Public in and for the St�'te'1,6"'(:'� Washington. Residing at My CoMmISSION EXPiRES 6-16-89. k AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH Susan Painter FILE NO. V-22-86 APPLICANT Ronald Walker, Jr. .being first duly sworn, on oath depose§ and says: That on the 28th day of July '19 86 , the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. I S i g n e d Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the' State of Washington. Residing at My, -COMMISSION EXPIRES 6-16-89- Zwitrof'Edmom'-s G Y McComas Fire Mars �l Zobby Mills P-.W.- -OFFIC ONDENCE INTER Dan Smith/Jerry Hauth ngineering uan�eBowman July 21, 1986 TO R F OM DATE SUBJECT CU-28-86 CONDIT-IONAL'USE PERMIT FOR ADDITION TO EXISTING PROFESSIONAL BUILDING IN MULTIFAMILY ZONE AT.627 DAYTON...STREET (RM-1.5) V-22-86 VARIANCE TO' -ALLOW EIGHT PARKING -SPACES INSTEAD OF CODE REQUIRED NINE PAR.KING'SPACES FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ADDITION AT 627 DAYTON STREET (RM-1.5 HEARING DATE: *AUGUST 7, 1986 PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER.THAN JULY 25, 1986. City of Edmon(,"s Gary McComas Fire Mars Bobby Mills P-.W. ' C INTER -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Duane Bowman TO FROM SUBJECT . oU-2e-86' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ADDITION TO EXISTING PROFESSIONAL BUILDING IN MULTIFAMILY ZONE AJ.627 DAYTON.5TREET (RM-1.5) V-22-86 VARIANCE TTALL0N EIGHT PARKING. -SPACES INSTEAD OF CODE REQUIRED NINE PARKING SPACES FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ADDITION AT 627 DAYTON STREET (KM-1.5 � HEARING DATE:''.AUGUST 7, 1986 ' PLEASE RESPOND'NITH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER -THAN JULY 25, 1986. THANKS. � ' . RECEIVED JUL 2Tl986 EN8|N[[RNG .� ' C<_ / n°"" `^~nr - July 21, 1986 oms RECEIVED City of Edmo[ S JUL 2 3 1986 �6y McComas Fire Mars Bobby Mills P.W. E N*ER-OFFICE CORRESPONDEN!C CITY OF EDMONDS Dan Smith/Jerry Hauth ngineering Duane Bowman July 21, 1986 TO FROM DATE SUBJECT CU-28-86 CONDITIONAL'USE PERMIT FOR ADDITION TO -EXISTING PROFESSIONAL BUILDING IN MULTIFAMILY ZONE AT'.627 DAYTON.-.STREET (.RM-1 .5) V-22-86 VARIANCE TO' -ALLOW EIGHT PARKING. -SPACES INSTEAD OF CODE REQUIRED NINE PARKING SPACES FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ADDITION AT 627 DAYTON STREET (RM-1.5 HEARING DATE: *.AUGUST 7, 1986 PLEASE RESPOND*WTTH YOUR COMMENTS NO LATER -THAN JULY 25, 1986. THANKS. R E C E I V E D JUL 22 1986 ED.MONDS FIRE DEPT. ce �� 4ck' E S: 3 "- j 2 � �,, 0\-\ - � � o -� �\ �, � 0 � S A EXHIBIT LIST CU-28-86 & V-22-86 EXHIBIT 1 - STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 2 - APPLICATIONS/DECLARATIONS EXHIBIT 3 - SITE PLAN EXHIBIT 4 - DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER, FILES: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 HEARING DATE: August 7, 1986 I. REQUESTED ACTION: Variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces by one and a conditional use permit for an office addition at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds. Conditional use permit for professional office addition at 637 Dayton Street, Edmonds. II. APPLICANT/OWNER: Ronald Walker, Jr. 22906 Park Road Edmonds, WA 98020 III. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit 2 IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: A. Description Of the Sub The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Durbin Street and Dayton Streets. The lot contains approximately 9,900 sq. ft. of area. The site is developed into one large office building (Building A) and a smaller office building (Building B)in the northwest corner of the lot. These two offices were allowed under CU-44-79 and CU-40-80. The Applicant is seeking a conditional use permit to add 574 sq. ft. of office area onto Building A. In addition to the conditional use permit, the Applicant is seeking a variance to reduce the total required number of parking spaces from nine to eight spaces. Surrounding develop-nent is a mixture of single family and multiple family residential uses. The Edmonds public library is located directly east, across Durbin Street. B. official Street Map Proposed R/W Existing R/W F Staff Report V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 2 East - Durbin Street 601 601 South - Dayton Street 60' 601 North - Alley 15' 151 C. Conformance to Chapter 20.05 & Chapter 20.85.010 1. Special Circumstances Special circumstances do appear to exist in this particular case. The lot slopes east to west and in order to add the additional one parking stall would man the removal of the Apple tree and lawn area behind Building A. 2. Special Privilege The proposed variance does not appear to represent a grant of special privilege. 3. comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Policy Plan map designates the subject property and surrounding area as Low Density Residential . and High Density Residential. The proposed variance, does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Zoning ordinance The subject property, as well as the surrounding area, is zoned RM -1.5. The proposed variance does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the zoning ordinance or the RM-1.5 zone district. 5. Not Detrimental The proposed variance does not appear to pose any significant impact to the public or to any near by private property or improvement. 6. Minimum Variance The requested variance does appear to represent a minimum variance request. a Page 3 7. Transferability The conditional use permit should be transferable. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the staff that CU-28-86 and V-22-86 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Comply with Architectural Design Board requirements. 2. The Ap roved as to form by .plicant shall file a covenant, app the City Attorney, that states that, in the event of a resulting parking problem, the one parking stall shall be installed or if the City amends its Community Development Code to allow payment of money into the in -lieu parking fund offices in RM zones, whichever comes first.. a PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM AND/OR WISH TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S FINDINGS OF FACT CU-28-86 RONALD WALKER, JR. V-22-86 Conditional use permit for professional office addition and variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 9 to 8 at 627-Dayton Street. NAM ADDRESS mf� R E U E I V - AUG 2 8 1k,-:) (,.a I OF EDMONL, CITY OF EOMONOS* LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250 5(h AVE. N. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 77 1 -3202 HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS AND DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FILE: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 OF RONALD WALKER, JR. FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DECISION: The variance and conditional use permit as requested are granted subject to conditions listed. INTRODUCTION Ronald Walker, Jr., 22906 Park Road, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, and hereinafter referred to as Applicant, has requested approval of a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces at a profes- sional office at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. In addition the Applicant has requested a conditional use permit for the allowance of an addition to a *professional office at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. A hearing on the request was held before the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds on August 7, 1986. At the hearing the following pre- sented testimony and evidence: Mary Lou Block Warren LaFon Edmonds Planning Dept. 111 Durbin Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 At the hearing the following exhibits were submitted and admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: Exhibit 1 - Staff Report 2 - Applications/Declarations 3 - Site Plan 4 - Declaration of Nonsignificance After due consideration of the evidence presented by the Applicant; evidence elicited during the public hearing; and, as a result of the personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding areas by the Hearing Examiner, the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions constitute the basis of tho-decision of the Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Applicant has requested approval of a variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces at property , located at 627 Dayton a Findings and decision Of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds Re: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 2 Street, Edmonds, Washington. The request is to reduce the required number of parking spaces by one. In addition, Applicant has requested a conditional use permit for the allowance of an addition to a pro- fessional office at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. 2. The subject property is located on * the Northwest corner of Durbin Street and Dayton Street. It is a lot of approximately 9,900 square feet. The lot is developed with two office buildings. (Staff report) 3. The subject property is zoned RM-1.5. Two office buildings were de- veloped pursuant to conditional use permits issued in 1979 and 1980. (Staff report) 4. it is the intent of the Applicant to'constructC-an additional 574 square feet of office area onto Building A. it is for this addition that the Applicant seeks a conditional use permit. (Block testimony) 5. With the proposed addition to office A the zoning code of the City of Edmonds requires that an Applicant have nine parking spaces. The Applicant is seeking a variance from this requirement and proposes eight parking spaces. .(Block testimony) 6. In order for a conditional use permit to be granted within the City of Edmonds, the criteria as set forth in Section 20.05-010 (ECDC) must be satisfied. These criteria include: A. The proposed use must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed use and its location must be consistent with the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the zone district in which the use is located and the proposed use must meet all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance. C. The proposed use must not significantly be detrimental to the public health, safety a ' nd welfare nor to nearby private proper- ties or improvements. (ECDC) 7. In order for a variance to be granted within the City of Edmonds, the criteria as set forth in Section 20.85.010 must be satisfied. These criteria include: A. Because of the special circumstances relating to the property, the strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. B. The approval o f a Variance would not be a grant of special privileges to the property in comparision with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. C. The approval of a variance will be consistent with the Comp- rehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds. a Findings and decision of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Edmonds Re: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 3 D. The.approval of the variance will be consistent with the pur- poses of the zoning ordinance and the zone district in which the property is located. E. The variance as approved or conditionally approved will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and same zone. F. The requested variance is the minimum necessary to allow the owner the rights enjoyed,by other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. (ECDC) 6. The Applicant intends to use the additional space in building as a conference room. Also, offices within the office building will be redesigned for better use of available space. There will be no additional personnel retained as a result of the proposed ex- pansion. (LaFon testimony) 7. Parking standards within the City of Edmonds require that the size of Building A have at least nine parking spaces. The Ap- plicant is proposing eight spaces. If a ninth space were developed the parking stall would result in the removal of an apple tree and lawn area that is*located behind Building A. However, because no additional personnel are proposed to be employed at the site, there appears to be no need for additional parking. (Staff report, LaFon testimony) 8. The proposed variance will not be the grant of a special privilege. (Staff report) 9. The Comprehensive policy Plan Map of the City of Edmonds designates the subject property as low density residential and high density residential. The requested variance does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 10. The proposed variance does not impact the public nor other private properties or improvements in the area. 11. The requested variance for the reduction of parking stalls does represent a minimum variance request. 12. The requested conditional use permit should be transferrable. 13. The Planning Departmen�t of the City of Edmonds has recommended approval of the conditional use permit and variance subject to the following conditions: 1. comply with architectural design board requirements. Findings and decision or the Hearing Examiner or the City of Edmonds Re: V-22-86 & CU-28-86 Page 4 2. The Applicant shall file a covenant, approved as to form by the City Attorney, that states that, in the event of a resulting parking problem, the one parking stall shall be installed or if the City amends its community developement code to allow payment of money into the in -lieu parking fund offices in RM zones, whichever comes first. (Staff report) 14. The City submitted that the Applicant was willing to buy a parking stall and participate in the parking fund program. However, because the subject property was located in a residential zone, the property does not qualify for the parking fund program. Condition No. 2 of the City's recommendation allows for participation should offices in RM zone be included as part of the program. (Block testimony) 15. No adverse testimony was received in this matter. CONCLUSION 1. The application is for the approval of a conditional use permit for the addition of 574 square feet of office area on a building located at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. Requested variance is for a reduction of the required parking spaces of nine for the parking lot that is adjacent to the building. The requested reduction is for the allowance of eight spaces. 2. The requested variance satisfies the criteria as set forth in Section 20.85.010. 3. Special circumstances exist for the granting of the variance. i Because there will be no increase in the number of employees on site and because the additional parking space will require removal of lawn area and an apple tree, special circumstances exist for the granting of this variance. 4. The granting of a.variance is not a special privilege. 5. The granting of a variance is consistent with the comprehensive policy plan map designation of the subject property and also the zoning destination of the subject property. The requested variance is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinances of the City of Edmonds. 6. The requested variance is not detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, nor to nearby private properties or improve- ments. 7. The requested variance is the minimum necessary for the Applicant to enjoy the property. 8. The requested conditional use permit satisfies the criteria of Section 20.05.010. (ECDC) 4 9. As noted the requested variance is consistent with the zoning ordinances of the City of Edmonds and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Edmonds. 10. . The conditional use permit would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and*welfare, nor to nearby private properties or improvements. 11. The conditional use permit should be transferrable. t MPrTqTnN Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions; the testi- mony and evidence submitted at the public hearing, and upon the impres- sions of the Hearing Examiner at a site view, it is hereby ordered that a conditional use permit for the allowance of an additional 574 square feet to be added on to building A at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washing- ton, is granted. Also -a variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces from nine to eight for the parking lot at 627 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington, is granted. Both the variance and the conditional use permit are subject to the following conditions: 1. The Applicant is to comply with all architectural design board requirements. 2. The Applicant shall file a covenant that is to be approved as to form by the City'Attorney. The covenant shall state that in the event of a parking problem onsite, the Applicant shall provide an additional stall onsite. If at the time the parking stall is needed and the City has amended its community Development Code to allow offices in an RM zone to be part of the parking fund that is made available in7lieu of construction of parking, the Applicants may elect to do so. 3. The Applic ant shall secure all necessary permits prior to com- mencing any construction. DONE AND DATED -this 26--day of August, 1986. D M�� ES 4:. xRISCOLL M D JHaring Examiner NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Written appeals alleging sp'ecific error of fact or other grounds for appeal may be filed with the.Planning Department, City of Edmonds, civic Center, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, within fourteen days of the date of the Hearing Examiner's final action. In this matter any appeal must be received by the Department prior to 5:00 P.M. On September 8, 1986. 0