650 EDMONDS WAY (2)'Wit
FIRE PREVENTION
x
wing Brier, Eatnonas, and 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT
SNOHOAIISH CO. Set
1. a 0 EDMONDS
Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 0 BRIER
F1 Phone (425) 551-1200 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
0 UNINCORPORATED
DISTR T www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272
650 Edmonds Way 98020
EQUE
MUNICY
_tA SHIFT
STAff
LOCATION:
5 Restaurant Bistro
4255637117
SCHEDULED M5y
2011
BUSINESS NAME:
PHONE:
DATE DUE
MAILING
650 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA 98020
UFIR 0
ADDRESS:
\1
J
Marshall Inman Leeann
BUSINESS OWNER:
HOME PHONE:
eCURRENT
EMERGENCY-1:
HOME PHONE:
A.7-
KEY ACCESS-2::
1 '7 - LI;6/ HOME PHONE:
CITY
YES NO
EMAIL:
gj't) e-f<3MA-^&f4 6 A (�� I,
BUSINESS
LICENSE
El
pow
PERSON CONTACTED: ter,- PKA�KMe4-
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTOR:
r r- -an o
Date Last Serviced: '26 13
X77
Serving Brier, Edmonds, and
Mountlake Terrace,,
www.FireDistrictl.org
12425 Meridian Ave S
Everett, WA 98208
Phone (425) 551-1200
Fax (425) 551-1272
FIRE PREVENTION
INSPECTIOh REPORT
0 EDMONDS
0 BRIER
0 MdUNTLAKE TERRACE
E3 UNINCORPORATED
,FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT
LOCATION:
650 Edmonds Way 98020 AnRl
BUSINESS NAME: PHONE: SCHEDULED
5 Restaurant Bistro 4255637117 DATE DUE 0 hAn�4 9Q16
MAILING UFIR ll�
ADDRESS: \1 161
650 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA 98020
�-,PUSINESS OWNER: —WOME PHONE:
EMERGENCY-1: 0"Z ego —HOA4E PHONE: L4 25 Z7-� 190T 0' CURRENT YES NO
KEY ACCESS-2:.Glaflel__T� HOME PHON E: CITY
EMAIL: w'n��&qo Ca—, BUSINESS
4 LICENSE
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
PERSON CONTACTED: A
.0 NAME OF INSPECTOR:
-15116
FIRE SYSTEMS: FE 5/13 H944M-a,
UatakeatcSoMigedocATiONS COMMUNICATIONS
. . ........
2
2
3
-3
4
'4
5
6
6
7
7
I AG�EE TO cbRRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
lst RE -INSPECTION
2nd RE -INSPECTION
FINAL RE
EXTENSION
-INSPECTION
VIOLATIONS
DATE DUE:
DATE DUE:
GRANTEDTO:
DATE DUE:
CITED:
PERSON
PERSON
PERSON
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
VIOLATIONS
VIOLATIONS�.,,'!
PRE -CITATION
CITATION ISSUED
15
1 5
__AE7E�
S�NT
M 01
CODE
2
2 6
DATE:
SECTION:
RETURN RECEIPT
3
7
3
7
RECEIVED
6
DISPOSITION:
4
8
LLETTER
DATE:
7
LETTER NEEDED C] YES El NO
NEEDED [0] YES 0 NO
I
I 8
SNCAI kSM Co.
FIRE
I "Tann
Serving Brier, Edmonds, and
Mountlake Terrace
JMA%..# JL www.FireDistrictl.org
LOCATION: 650 'Edmonds Way 98020
BUSINESS NAME: 5 Restaurant Bistro
MAILING 650 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA 98020
ADDRESS:
FIRE PREVENTION
12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT
Everett, WA 98208 0 EDMONDS
0 BRIER
Phone (425) 551-1200 [1 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
[I UNINCORPORATED
F,a:c (425) 551-1272
PHONE: 4255637117
" FREQUENCY I STATION& SHIF"I
Annual 17-A
SCHEDULEDMay 2015
DATE DUE
161
UFIR
BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE:
Clark, Ted 2062271593
EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: rCURRENT YES NO
KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY
EMAIL: BUSINESS
LICENSE
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
PERSON CONTACTED: Aly, I'z A4�1 6 T
NAME OF INSPECTORJ9 — //&g k? <I--
. 7M _,, Ifr d
Mr
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS
2 6L4e
2
3
3
A
4
4
5 oe 000!��
V
5
Milt
6
7
7
I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAY; X
In our continuing effort to promote fire safety and prevention within the community, your fire department conducts
regularly scheduled "Fire Safety Survey Inspections" of all businesses and multi -family occupancies in the Cities
covered by Snohomish County Fire District 1.
You are to be congratulated on the relative good condition of your occupancy in regards to fire safet Above you
will find the item(s) that were noted during our inspection which require attention to bring them int ompliance
with the minimum standards adopted by the above jurisdictions.
Any overlooked hazards or violations of the fire regulations does not imply approval of such contlitions or violation.
If you require additional information or to schedule a re -inspection for Edmonds or the Town of Woodway, call (425)
775-7720; for Mountlake Terrace or Brier, call (425) 754-0434.
BUSINESS COPY
Westfall, John
From: Bjorback, Leif
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:12 PM
To: Westfall, John
Subject: FW: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
John, this scenario actually has similarities to the Loft. Let's talk about rated walls and roof/ceilings, and parapets and things. Note the lot line between the 2
buildings.
From: David Gilchrist [mailto:david@dgilchristarchitect.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:25 AM
To: Bjorback, Leif; Westfall, John (Fire District Address)
Subject: RE: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
Leif and John,
I am working with Ted on developing a plan to have a covered terrace for FIVE. In order to do this, a fire -suppression sprinkler system would be
installed for the restaurant and terrace.
The new covered trellis structure would be a mix of steel and wood framing with a roof of metal panels and some translucent/skylight panels. There
would be openings or chimneys over the fire elements.
Here is my question: are there restrictions for can the new covered, sprinklered terrace structure in its adjacency to the neighboring building? Or
could the covered trellis structure be built to within a foot of the adjacent building (which is a concrete wall)?
Thank you,
David Gilchrist
From: Bjorback, Leif [ma ilto: Leif. Bjorback0)edmondswa.qo
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:40 AM
To: �Vestfall, John (Fire District Address); 'David Gilchrist'
Subject: RE: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
David, the OL factors come from IBC Table 1004.1.2. The current OL for the indoor portion of the restaurant is 98, as was established when the restaurant
started in 2009. See the attached pdf which I scanned from our copy of the approved plans for that project.
Leif
From: Westfall, John (Fire District Address)
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 8:50 AM
To: 'David Gilchrist'; Bjorback, Leif
Subject: RE: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
David:
I don't know if you have access to approved T1 plans for restaurant, but the best place to start is where we left off.
Leif can correct me if wrong, the kitchen and bar areas are calculated separately. The bathrooms are occupied by patrons who already have seats in dining so
they do not add to overall load. The assembly area is calculated by net dining area, not gross for the building. Where there are bench seats affixed they are
calculated at 18" per space. I believe Five is tables and chairs so your OL factor is 15.
Again, the calculations have been made for the inside excluding the deck for the reason it was not covered. Please start at that point, then you may show us the
additional covered area impacts.
John
From: David Gilchrist [mailto:david@)dqilchristarchitect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 9:52 AM
To: John J. Westfall; '13jorback, Leif
Subject: RE: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
Leif and John,
Thank you for your responses. I'd like to verify the OL for the restaurant as it is currently configured to determine if we will trigger the fire sprinkler
requirement.
My understanding for a restaurant A-2 assembly:
1. OL is determined by the net floor area of the dining and bar seating area, but does not include the toilet rooms, storage, mechanical room etc
2. Can you advise me how the OL for the kitchen and the area behind the bar is calculated?
Thank you -
David
From: John 3. Westfall [ma i Ito: iwestfa I I Offi red istrictl.org]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:04 PM
To: '13jorback, Leif; David Gilchrist
Subject: RE: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
David:
The outdoor public assembly area is not separated from the indoor assembly and are calculated together where covered outdoors. 100 aggregate occupant load
is the threshold for A2 occupancies triggering automatic sprinklers. IBC 903.2.1.2
You would need to maintain your exits because your 2 "d exit for interior is across the deck.
Regarding tents; they are temporary arrangement, similar to what you might expect at Taste of Edmonds over a weekend, and with conditions. If you are using
your tent in more than temporary fashion, we will look at the same as permanent, see above.
To cover, fire pits will require ventilation per mechanical code and separation from combustibles including roof covers, supports, decorations, etc...
John 3. Westfall
Fire Marshal
Fire Prevention Services
425-771-0213 Desk
425-775-7721 Fax
425-231-3644 Mobile
Mono I Co.
F1 MIM E NO
DIRWINT
From: Bjorback, Leif [mailto: Leif. Bjorback0)edmondswa.qo
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:48 AM
To: David Gilchrist
�-7
TECHNICA. LLTS
r_1 V115
FPA 15 defines "exposure pro-
tection" as, "Absorption of heat
through application of water
spray to structures or equip-
ment exposed to a fire, to limit surface
temperature to a level that will minimize
damage and prevent failure." (See section
3.3.9 in the 2012 edition of NFPA 15, simi-
lar sections in previous editions.)
Using this definition, you would get
the impression that exposure protection
systems are
spread of a fire. Instead, the purpose of
an exposure protection system as efined
by NFPA 15 seems to be to� k
_�s �e
other object cool ns
close to it. It would appear that the goal of
the exposure protection system is not to
put the fire ou the spread of he
fire, but -to help the object near the fire
survive du—ri—nTtmi—�Tir—e—e—ve—nT—wrife—s—ome
o Fe _rs `ys t —em— tin _uisher puts
Although NFPA 13 does not have a defi-
nition for exposure protection, it does, at
first glance, appear to agree with NFPA 15.
The rules in section 7.8 of NFPA 13 that
apply to exposure protection systems
only apply to outside exposure protection
systems that protect the building from
fires outside of the building. This would
be consistent with the NFPA 15 philoso-
phy that the exposure protection system
is not putting water on the fire itself and
is not helping to control the fire. Instead,
the exposure protection system is spray-
ing water on the building next to the fire in
order to keep it cool so that the fire does
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
c M, cc -:11 NT G�6� ', `0
rr n- r7- -b 0
Exposure Protection Systems
and Water Curtains
not damage the building next to it.
Unfortunately, the rest of NFPA 13 is
not so clear about the goal of exposure
protection systems, and other NFPA
documents cloud the issue as well. Within
NFPA 13 and NFPA 80A (Recommended
Practice for Protection of Buildings from
Exterior Fire Exposures) are references to
exposure protection systems that spray
on the fire (while also possibly spraying
across openings in windows or on doors).
These systems are considered exposure
protection systems because they control
the fire, and therefore stop the fire from
getting into the building next door.
W!!EuRLay onto
a veaLc���Ii( called
a !��ur�tain. So, the question then
becomes, "Is a water curtain an exposure
protection system?" The answer to this
question, according to NFPA 13, is defi-
nitely, "no." While there is no definition of
a water curtain, NFPA 13 contains differ-
ent installation and discharge criteria for
water curtains than it does for exposure
protection, which leads to the conclusion
that they are different types of systems.
Since people frequently do not know
whether to follow the rules for water
curtains or exposure protection systems
when laying out and calculating a sys-
tem that includes sprinklers or nozzles
to spray across openings in walls or on
windows, the specifying engineer needs
to be extremely clear when writing the
specifications to let people know the
design intent. Without clear instructions
from the specifying engineer, it is difficult
By Kenneth E. Isman, P.E.
for the sprinkler contractor to know which
set of rules to follow.
This article will not make recommenda-
tions as to which way to go in determining
whether a system is an exposure protec-
tion system or a water curtain. Instead,
this article will pull together the rules for
each type of system so that the contrac-
tor understands what is required once the
decision has been made as to which type
of system will be installed.
Installation Rules for Exposure
Protection Systems
The installation rules for exposure protec-
tion systems can be found in Chapters 7,
8 and 22 of NFPA 13. It is not intuitive to
think that installation rules would be in
Chapter 22 (the Plans and Calculations
chapter of the standard), which is one
of the reasons we decided to write'this
article to try and explain all of the rules.
The general installation rules that ap-
ply to all exposeFe-p;otection systems in
N F PA 13 6're preqy
re _��ion 8.3.4.2
allows sprkiers; with k-factors less than
>>CONTINUED ON PAGE 20
Vice President, Engineering
for NFSA. Ken represents
NFSA on the NFPA Technical
Committee on Sprinkler
System Discharge Criteria
M
b
19
V
0
E
�11
20
>>CONTINUED FROM PAGE 19
5.6 to be used in any exposure protection
system. Section 22.7 appears to apply to
all exposure protection systems from its
heading, but in reading through the sec-
. only makes sense to apg y this por-
tion, it only makes sense t
tion F_
We�r4_ta_m �ide exposure
protect protect
walls and windows from fires outs-3-61he
buildiN-as—d------�—ec-tio—nZE-The
one surprising installation requirement in
section 22.7 is a sprinkler spacing issue,
where the maximum allowable distance
between s .
pFiftklers protecting a window
14�less the sprinklers are
opening I
specifically listed to protect a wider open-
ing (see section 22.7.7.2).
Section 7.8 of NFPA 13 applies to expo-
sure protection systems that are mounted
on the outside n-
tended to protect the building from a fire
o u t s i d T`5TTF_e_b_u Til d-i-n g- -(t-h e-iii -re-c-o-u rdTe- i n
the buIlTing next door �abrushftorest fire,
or a-7ehl7cFeT-ire). These t_yp_es57§y`§rMs
can be installed on-buildinqs that are
spr n buildings tha t
spikIlered. Note that these are a subset
of exposure protection systems and that
these rules do not apply to all exposure
protection systems. These rules only
apply to exposure protection systems
installed on the outside of buildings to
protect the building from a fire adjacent
to the building. Section 7.8 requires the
following:
0 The goal is to provide protection
or m'cre ��s-
',�rotect the whole wall (typically
selected for combustible .0
L��
e openings (usually
windows) in masonry walls.
- Protect the roo .
0 A single line of sprinklers is allowed to
protect up to two stories of wall or two
levels of vertically aligned windows as
long as there are no window sills, pro-
trusions or recesses along the wall
be between 6 and 12 inches from the
wall surface and can be up to 8 ft apart
(or greater if listed for greater distanc-
es between sprinklers).
E For window protection, sprinklers need
to be between 7 and 12 inches of the
window surface depending on the width
of the window (see Table 7.8.8.4).
N For roof protection, open spray sprin-
klers are permitted to be used when
Ordinary Hazard Group 1 rules are fol-
lowed with deflectors parallel to the
slope and a minimum of 18 inches over
the roof surface. Upright sprinklers can
be positioned at least 6 inches above
the peak of the roof with horizontal de-
flectors and the spacing determined in
the plan view (not along the slope).
0 NFPA 13 encourages the connection of
these systems to automatic water sup-
plies, but the standard also recognizes
that the AHJ could approve a manual
system fed by a fire department con-
nection or a manual system connected
to a water supply with a normally closed
valve that is manually opened when
the fire occurs. If the fire department
connection is used as a water supply, it
needs to be located away from the area
of the expected fire.
0 Each -system needs its own indepen-
dent control valve.
0 Sprinklers can be open or automatic,
but if open sprinklers are going to be
used on an automatic system, detec-
tors need to be used that are suitable
for this type of outdoor system.
N Systems with automatic sprinklers in
areas subject to freezing need to be ei-
ther dry -pipe systems or antifreeze sys-
tems.
more than 1-inch in depth that would � N
Each system needs a drain valve on the
system side of the control valve except
for open sprinkler top -fed systems that
are designed to drain on their own.
N Where sorinklers are installed on two
adjacent sides of the building to pro-
0 For wall protection, sprinklers need to tect against two separate hazards, the
prevent the water from flowing down
the wall. Where sills, protrusions or re-
cesses exceed 1-inch, a row of sprinklers
is required for each story or row of win-
dows.
sprinkler system needs to be fed with
control valves for,each side and two
choices.are provided for arranging the
sprir�klers:
- Connect the end of the branch
lines with check valves so that one
sprinkler around the corner will be
fed from the other side (see Figure
A.7.8.4.2.1) with the piping pitched
to drain the center section between
check valves; or
- Install two separate branch lines
for each side with each branch line
wrapping around the corner and
providing one sprinkler on the other
side (see Figure A.7.8.4.2.3).
N Where one exposure hazard affects the
protected building, the exposure pro-
tection system shall be a single system.
E Pipe and fittings must be corrosion re-
sistant.
0 If sprinklers with k-factors smaller than
2.8 are used, strainers are required.
Discharge Rules for Exposure
Protection Systems
The discharge rules for exposure protec-
tion systems are found in section 11.3.2
and 22.7. Section 11.3.2 appears to apply
to all exposure protection systems, but
does not contain much significant criteria.
Section 22.7 has the important criteria
for flow and pressure demands, including
section 22.7.1, which gives the user two
options. Option 1 is to use Table 22.7.1 to
determine flow and pressure demands.
Option 2 is to get other flow and pressure
demands from another source (such as
a specifying engineer) and then make
sure that those other flow and pressure
demands are acceptable to the Authority
Having Jurisdiction.
Option 1 (designing the system to meet
Table 22.7.1) is only appropriate for expo-
sure protection systems on the outside of
a building that are protecting the building
from a nearby fire. The table provides
minimum densities of water that need to
be applied to the vertical surface of the
wall depending on the expected sever -
>>CONTINUED ON PAGE 21
>>CONTINUED FROM PAGE 20
ity of the nearby fire. The severity of
the nearby fire is expressed in terms of
a guide number. The higher the guide
number, the hotter the nearby fire is ex-
pected to be and the greater the density
needed to absorb the heat and keep the
wall cool. The guide number for any par-
ticular situation can be determined using
the method shown in NFPA 80A. The
following is a summary of the rest of the
discharge rules in section 22.7:
0 The minimum pressure required at
each sprinkler will be the minimum
necessary to discharge the minimum
density out of the sprinkler against the
wall or window, but in no case is the
pressure allowed to be below 7 psi.
N When using upright or pendent sprin-
klers to spray against the wall, only half
of the discharge from the sprinkler is
allowed to count towards this density.
For example, if Table 22.7.1 requires a
minimum density of 0.3 gpm per sq ft
and an upright sprinkler is being used
to achieve this density, the minimum,
flow required out of the sprinkler (as-
suming that it covers 80 sq ft of wall)
would be 48 gpm (0.3 x 80 x 2 = 48)
rather than the typical 24 gpm that
would normally be required for a sprin-
kler covering 80 sq ft to produce a den-
sity of 0.3. This makes sense in that
half of the spray will not be against the
wall.
E Where closed sprinklers are used, the
water supply will need to be capable of
supplying all of the sprinklers along an
exposure up to a maximum length of
300 ft.
0 Where open sprinklers are used, the
water supply will need to be capable of
supplying all of the systems that would
be triggered along a 300 ft length.
0 The water supply duration needs to last
for at least 60 minutes.
Option 2 is appropriate for other kinds
of exposure protection systems. How-
ever, NFPA 13 does not contain specific
criteria for these systems. There is some
information in NFPA 15 on how to design
these systems for certain target hazards.
Whether the design criteria from N FPA 15
gets used, or whether some other criteria
is used for the design of the exposure
protection system is up to the specifying
engineer, who needs to communicate this
information fully to the contractor in the
sl�iecifications.
How is the Water Curtain Criteria
Different?
Section 11.3.3 of NFPA 13 covers the crite-
ria for water curtains. The sprinklers in a
water curtain are designed to discharge
3 gpm for every lineal foot of space that
they cover. For example, if sprinklers are
spaced 6 ft apart, the sprinkler will need
to discharge 18 gpm Q x 6 = 18) to cover
that distance.
The design area for a water curtain us-
ing closed sprinklers is calculated based
on the familiar formula of 1.2 times the
square root of the design area for the
hazard adjacent to the water curtain.
For example, if the sprinklers next to the
water curtain are designed to protect an
ordinary hazard group 2 occupancy at
0.2 gpm per sq ft over 1500 sq ft, then
the number of sprinklers in the water
curtain design area will be those within
46.5 ft 0.2 times the square root of 1500
is 46.476). If the sprinklers are spaced 6
ft apart, this would be 8 sprinklers (46.5
divided by 6 is 7.7 rounded up to 8). If
the sprinklers protecting the adjacent oc-
cupancy were changed to quick response
and the discharge criteria changed to 0.2
gpm per sq ft over 900 sq ft, then the
water curtain would need to be designed
for all of the sprinklers along 36 ft of the
opening 0.2 times the square root of 900
is 36), which would be 6 sprinklers at 6 ft
spacing (36 divided by 6 is 6).
The design area for a water curtain
using open sprinklers would be all of the
sprinklers on the system. If there were
multiple water curtain systems in the
same fire area, the hydraulic calculations
would need to include all of the water
curtain systems that would reasonably
be expected to open for any single fire.
In either case (open or closed sprin-
klers) the hydraulic calculations for the
water curtain need to include ceiling
>>CONTINUED ON PAGE 22
F'A
mky_-'�q
a - 01-M _ii
A
L 41
r
- -3w— = -=
cum
irFW&o
Spdn r D
E
AL
,WJTTERRAU VALM3
Fbw
Why argcoxom?
-Ease of Ordering
-Save Money
-Get the right item every time
-Over 8,000 items available
-View buying history
-Check Invoices
-Catalogs, Tech Data & MSDS
-Video Demonstrations
-Place Orde.rs 2417
C all In tofty ' t9 -5=01L you'r
argeo.c9m tog4a'
fdr deeper. disotintst
21
21
E
N
22
>>CONTINUED FROM PAGE 21
sprinklers for the hazard near the water I
curtain. The flow demand for the design
area of the ceiling sprinklers needs to be
added to the flow demand for the water
curtain at the point of connection after
balancing to the higher pressure demand
at the connection node. Note that the re-
quirement is not to add the ceiling sprin-
kler demand for the ceiling sprinklers a
long ways away from the water curtain.
You only need to calculate the ceiling
demand adjacent to the water curtain
that would legitimately be created by the
worst -case single fire.
Section 11.3.3A explicitly says that the
water curtain rules are required to be
used for two situations. The first is where
closely spaced sprinklers are being used
around a staircase or escalator opening in
conjunction with draft stops. The second
is where sprinklers are being used to cre-
ate a water curtain across the opening of
a proscenium stage.
clarification is sectioC705.8�2, the
International Building C��Jja:'_S_
section provides some relief from fire
doors -or
ing5_11Lgegrtain walls where the building is
sprinklered and where, "exterior openings
are ec e wa er cur ains using au-
to atic sprinklers approved for that u�e."
Since the IBC uses the term i
curtains rather than exposure protection
in section 705.8.2, it would be logical to
assume that they mean what they say
and that the water curtain rules -of NFPA
13 are to be observed. If the sprinklers are
to be installed inside the building to spray
on the fire side of the window during a fire
in the building, then it would be consistent
with everything discussed in this article to
follow the rules for water curtains. But if
the intent is to have the sprinkler system
i6stalled on the MtTide of the building to
protect the building next door, then Fh—is
really be an exposure protection
The water curtain rules are permitted sy9fern as opposed to a wate—rc-75—in—We-
to be used-To—rother types of situ2 Uins, wili—c-onTi-nue—ro—assume that the intent of
but as explained earlier in this article, the the IBC is to install the sprinklers on the
spe—c71v'inaen9EinReeiLauJs to be clear t hat interior of the building under construc-
the a er c t * rules are expectedlo be tion (in addition to the sprinkler system in
Red One situatmon that could use some that building) and that the rules of water
Jur%010-12. 2012
curtains are sufficient to meet the intent
of the IBC since that is the language that
is used in that code.
Summary
The rules for the design and installation
of exposure protection systems and water
curtains are different in NFPA 13. In order
to make sure that the design intent of the
engineer is met, the specifying engineer
needs to be explicit and use the correct
terminology in writing the specifications
for what is going to be installed. In some
cases, NFPA 13 or the IBC is explicit as to
which set of rules need to be followed. For
other circumstances, the specifications
need to be clear in order to make sure
that the proper fire protection is provided
fo r t h e b uikfin—g___---,
#-1-he system is intended 't_o_� an
ent from the type of system discussed in
Section 7.8 of NFPA 13, then the specify-
ing engineer has an obligation to specify
the installation and discharge rules since
llq�ey are not explicitly stated in NFPA
standards. (5
A CASA,
vvvvvv.casa-fs.arg - 905-477-2270 - ricaplic4a(Mcase-ft.arg
SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY
[F] 404.3 Automatic sprinkler protection. An approved
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout the
entire building.
Exceptions:
I . That area of a building adjacent to or above the
atrium need not be sprinklered provided that portion
of the building is separated from the atrium portion
by not less than 2-hour fire barriers constructed in
accordance with Section 707 or horizontal assem-
blies constructed in accordance with Section 711, or
both.
2. Where the ceiling of the atrium is more than 55 feet
(1 16 764 mm) above the floor, sprinkler protection at
the ceiling of the atrium is not required.
[F] 404.4 Fire alarm system. Afire alarm system shall be
provided in accordance with Section 907.2.14.
404.5 Smoke control. A smoke control system shall be
installed in accordance with Section 909.
Exception: Smoke control is not required for atriums that
connect only two stories.
404.6 Enclosure of atriums. Atrium spaces shall be sepa-
rated from adjacent spaces by a 1-hour fire barrier con-
structed in accordance with Section 707 or a horizontal
assembly constructed in accordance with Section 711, or
Exception: A fire barrier is not required where a glass
wall forming a smoke partition is provided. The glass
wall shall comply with all of the following:
I . Automatic sprinklers are provided along both sides
of the separation wall and doors, or on the room side
only if there is not a walkway on the atrium side.
The sprinklers shall be located between 4 inches and
12 inches (102 nim and 305 mm) away from the
glass and at intervals along the glass not greater than
6 feet (1829 mm). The sprinkler system shall be
designed so that the entire surface of the glass is wet
upon activation of the sprinkler system without
obstruction;
1. 1. The glass wall shall be installed in a gas-
keted frame in a manner that the framing
system deflects without breaking (loading)
the glass before the sprinkler system oper-
ates; and
1.2. Where alass doors are provided in the glass
Z'
wall, they shall be either self -closing or auto-
matic -closing.
A fir—e -haFr-ie�is not required where a
wall assembly co—m—p-rying--wTdr-Srmi—o—n-2-110 and
having a '/,-hourfire protection rating is provided.
3. Afire barrier is not required between the atrium and
the adjoining spaces of any three floors of the atrium
provided such spaces are accounted for in the design
of the smoke control system.
[F] 404.7 Standby power. Equipment required to provide
smoke control shall be connected to a standby power system
in accordance with Section 909.11.
404.8 Interior finish. The interiorfinish of walls and ceil-
ings of the atrium shall be not less than Class B with no
reduction in class for sprinkler protection.
404.9 Travel distance. In other than the lowest level of the
atrium, where the required means of egress is through the
atrium space, the portion of exit access travel distance within
the atrium space shall be not greater than 200 feet (60 960
mm). The travel distance requirements for areas of buildings
open to the atrium and where access to the exits is not
through the atrium, shall comply with the requirements of
Section 1016.
SECTION 405
UNDERGROUND BUILDINGS
405.1 General. The provisions of Sections 405.2 through
405. 10 apply to building spaces having a floor level used for
human occupancy more than 30 feet (9144 mm) below the
finished floor of the lowest level of exit discharge.
Exception: The provisions of Section 405 are not appli-
cable to the following buildings or portions of buildings:
1. One- and two-family dwellings, sprinklered in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.3.
2. Parking garages provided with automatic sprinkler
systems in compliance with Section 405.3.
3. Fixed guideway transit systems.
4. Grandstands, bleachers, stadiums, arenas and simi-
lar facilities.
5. Where the lowest stor ' v is the only story that would
qualify the building as an underground building and
has an area not greater than 1,500 square feet (139
m') and has an occupant load less than 10.
6. Pumping stations and other similar mechanical
spaces intended only for limited periodic use by ser-
vice or maintenance personnel.
405.2 Construction requirements. The underground portion
of the building shall be of Type I construction.
[F] 405.3 Automatic sprinkler system. The highest level of
exit discharge serving the underground portions of the build-
ing and all levels below shall be equipped with an automatic
sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section
903.3.1.1. Water -flow switches and control valves shall be
supervised in accordance with Section 903.4.
405.4 Compartmentation. Compartmentation shall be in
accordance with Sections 405.4.1 through 405.4.3.
405.4.1 Number of compartments. A building having a
floor level more than 60 feet (18 288 mm) below the fin-
ished floor of the lowest level of exit discharge shall be
divided into no fewer than two compartments of approxi-
mately equal size. Such compartmentation shall extend
60 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE'0
CHAPTER 6
TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 601
GENERAL
601.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall control the
classification of buildings as to type of construction.
SECTION 602
CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION
602.1 General. Buildings and structures erected or to be
erected, altered or extended in height or area shall be classi-
fied in one of the five construction types defined in Sections
602.2 through 602.5. The building elements shall have afire -
resistance rating not less than that specified in Table 601 and
exterior walls shall have a fire- resistance rating not less than
that specified in Table 602. Where required to have afire -
resistance rating by Table 601, building elements shall com-
ply with the applicable provisions of Section 703.2. The pro-
tection of openings, ducts and air transfer openings in
building elements shall not be required unless required by
other provisions of this code.
602.1.1 Minimum requirements. A building or portion
thereof shall not be required to conform to the details of a
type of construction higher than that type which meets the
minimum requirements based on occupancy even though
certain features of such a building actually conform to a
higher type of construction.
602.2 Types I and 11. Types I and 11 construction are those
types of construction in which the building elements listed in
Table 601 are of noncombustible materials, except as permit-
ted in Section 603 and elsewhere in this code.
602.3 Type 111. Type III construction is that type of construc-
tion in which the exterior walls are of noncombustible materi-
als and the interior building elements are of any material
permitted by this code. Fire -retardant -treated wood framing
complying with Section 2303.2 shall be permitted within
exterior wall assemblies of a 2-hour rating or less.
602.4 Type IV. Type IV construction (Heavy Timber, HT) is
that type of construction in which the exterior walls are of
noncombustible materials and the interior building elements
are of solid or laminated wood without concealed spaces. The
details of Type IV construction shall comply with the provi-
sions of this section. Fire- retardant- treated wood framing
complying with Section 2303.2 shall be permitted within
exterior wall assemblies with a 2-hour rating or less. Mini-
mum solid sawn nominal dimensions are required for struc-
tures built using Type IV construction (HT). For glued -
laminated members the equivalent net finished width and
depths corresponding to the minimum nominal width and
TABLE 601
FIRE -RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS (HOURS)
BUILDING ELEMENT
TYPE I
TYPE 11
TYPE III
PE IV
TYPE V
A
B
A d
B
A d
B
HT
A d
B
Primary structural frameg (see Section 202)
3'
2 a
1
0
1
0
HT
1
0
Bearing walls
Exteriorf- 9
3
2
1
0
2
2
2
1
0
Interior
3a
2'
1
0
1
0
I/HT
1
0
Nonbearing walls and partitions
Exterior
See Table 602
Nonbearing walls and partitions
See
Interiore
0
0
0
0
0
0
Section
0
0
602.4.6
Floor construction and associated secondary members
(see Section 202)
2
2
1
0
1
0
HT
1
0
Roof construction and associated secondary members
1 1/2b
i b,c
b,c
1
0C
I b'C
0
HT
I b'C
0
(see Section 202)
For SI: I foot = 304.8 mm.
a. Roof supports: Fire -resistance ratings of primary structural frame and bearing walls are permitted to be reduced by 1 hour where supporting a roof only.
b. Except in Group F- 1, H, M and S- I occupancies, fire protection of structural members shall not be required, including protection of roof framing and decking
where every part of the roof construction is 20 feet or more above any floor immediately below. Fire -retardant -treated wood members shall be allowed to be
used for such unprotected members.
c. In all occupancies, heavy timber shall be allowed where a 1 -hour or less fire -resistance rating is required.
d. An approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3. 1.1 shall be allowed to be substituted for I -hour fire -resistance -rated construction,
provided such system is not otherwise required by other provisions of the code or used for an allowable area increase in accordance with Section 506.3 or an
allowable height increase in accordance with Section 504.2. The 1 -hour substitution for the fire resistance of exterior walls shall not be permitted.
e. Not less than the fire -resistance rating required by other sections of this code.
f. Not less than the fire -resistance rating based on fire separation distance (see Table 602).
g. Not less than the fire -resistance rating as referenced in Section 704. 10
2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODEO 107
John J. Wesffall
From: John J. Wesffall
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:04 PM
To: 'Bjorback, Leif; David Gilchrist
Subject: RE: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
David:
The outdoor public assembly area is not separated from the indoor assembly and are calculated together where covered outdoors. 100 aggregate occupant load
is the threshold for A2 occupancies triggering automatic sprinklers. IBC 903.2.1.2
You would need to maintain your exits because your 2 nd exit for interior is across the deck.
Regarding tents; they are temporary arrangement, similar to what you might expect at Taste of Edmonds over a weekend, and with conditions. If you are using
your tent in more than temporary fashion, we will look at the same as permanent, see above.
To cover, fire pits will require ventilation per mechanical code and separation from combustibles including roof covers, supports, decorations, etc...
John J. Westfall
Fire Marshal
Fire Prevention Services
425-771-0213 Desk
425-775-7721 Fax
425-231-3644 Mobile
P51MMOMUM CO
From: Bjorback, Leif [mailto: Leif. Bjorback(9bedmondswa.qov]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:48 AM
To: David Gilchrist
Cc: John 1. Westfall
Subject: RE: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
Hi David,
I have forwarded your message to John Westfall since he and I will both need to weigh in on this project. Assuming the structural will not be difficult to design,
there are at least a couple of other concerns that will need to be addressed. One is the requirement for fire sprinklers if the covered seating area (combining
inside and outside) reaches an occupant load of 100 (1 seem to recall that the inside OL already is in the 90's.) John may be able to explain this concept more
clearly that 1.
The other is the protection/ venting of the outdoor fire pits once a roof covering is installed. John will need to weigh in on this issue as well. Thanks for getting us
into the conversation early on this concept.
.Leif Bjorback
Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220 x 1380
From: David Gilchrist [mailto:david(5)dqilchristarchitect.com
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 3:17 PM
To: 13jorback, Leif -
Subject: FIVE terrace trellis replacement
Leif,
In the fall we discussed removing the existing trellis at FIVE's terrace with a temporary event tent. Now we are looking at replacing the existing
wood trellis with a steel and wood structure that would be partially covered with roofing panels. The attached drawings show a preliminary idea.
Can you tell me if you see any issues with this that could present a problem? One question that I have is if this will affect the occupant load of the
existing restaurant. The terrace has two means of egress so that no occupants will need to egress through the existing building —so it seems like it
would not add to the existing eating areas OL—but I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.
Thank you,
David Gilchrist
425-417-8492
From: Bjorback, Leif [ma i Ito: Leif. Bjorback(a)ed mondswa. go
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:39 PM
To: David Gilchrist; Westfall, John
r-1
Cc: 'FIVE Restaurant I Bistro'
Subject: RE: FIVE temporary event tents
David,
I spoke with John Westfall and if possible we would like you to provide a simple floor plan of the outdoor dining area to give us a little better idea where the tent
would go. We're not sure yet whether this will need a permit or not. I can say that, in order to take down the trellis, you will need to obtain a demolition permit,
which is low cost and available over the counter. Let us know if you have any more specific questions.
Thank you,
lei Bjorback
if
Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220 x 1380
From: David Gilchrist [mai Ito: clavid O)dq i lch rista rchitect. com
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 11:54 AM
To: Bjorback, Leif; Westfall, John
Cc: 'FIVE Restaurant I Bistro'
Subject: FIVE temporary event tents
Leif,
Following up on our phone conversation regarding FIVE:
Ted Clark would like to remove the wood trellis structure from the terrace at Five and put up an 15' x 25' event tent over a portion of the terrace that
would remain in place during through the winter.
Please provide input on what information we need to provide to the city in order to have this reviewed and approved.
Thank you,
David Gilchrist
425-417-8492
FIRE PREVENTION
A it
INSPECTION REPORT
.SNOHOMISH CO. Serving Briei: Edhion.ds, wid 12425 Meridian Ave S
A 98208 EDMONDS
Mountlake Terrace Everett, W CRIER
FIR Ph )551 0 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
one(425 -1200 [1 UNINCORPORATED
DIS R, T www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272
LOCATION: FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIFT
650 Edmonds Way 98020 .4 nual 17-D
BUSINESS NAME: PHONE: SCHEDULED
5 Restaurant Bistro 1 4255-637117 DATE DUE I" May 2014
MAILING UFIR � 161
ADDRESS:
650 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, 98020
BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE.-
EMERGENCY-1: Clark, Ted HOME �PHONE7 371,17 CURRENT
KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YE� NO
���TILICENSE
EMAIL: BUSINESS El
PERSON CONTACTED. INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTOR:
Fi RE SYSTEMS:
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS
2
2
3
V
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
1 AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1st RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
2nd RE -INSPECTION
D E DUE:
1
EXTENSION
GRANTEDTO:
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
VIOLATIONS
CITED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
I
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
5
VIOLATIONS
1 5
PRE -CITATION
LETTER SENT
CITATION ISSUED
NUMBER:
4
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION.
5
3
7
3
7
RETURN RECEIPT
RECEIVED
6
4
18
4
18
DATE:
DISPOSITION:
'\� LETTER NEEDED C] YES [I �10
LETTER NEEDED E] YES El NO
8
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
0 ��
M__/
0 )
1 1)
Edinonds
.0-Ping pa,
SNOHOMISH CO. 1. A ".
Mountlake Tei-i-acoand
the Town of W6odwav
DISTRT www. Fireilistric�]. or'g
LOCATION: 650 Edmonds Way
BUSINESS NAME: 5 Restaurant Bistro
MAILING 650 Edmonds Wy
ADDRESS: Edmonds
BUSINESS OWNER: Clark, Ted
EMERGENCY-1: Marshalt-Inman, Brad
KEY ACCESS-2:
PERSON CONTACTED:
NAME OF INSPECTOR:
FIRE
SYSTEMS:
'12425 Mei-idian Ave S
Evei-ett, WA 98208
Phone (425) 551-1200
Fax (425) 551-1272
PHONE: 4255637117
98020
HOME PHONE: 4255637117
HOME PHONE: 2063180724
HOME PHONE:
FIRE PREV ENTION
INSPECTIOM REPORT
El EDMONDS
0 BRIER
El WOODWAY
[I MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
0 UNINCORPORATED
FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIFi**'
365 20 B
SCHEDULED
DATEDUE 1" 05/01/12
UFIR � 161 5103
OCC LOAD 98
CURRENT
CITY YES 0
BUSINESS
LICENSE E�11:1
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
FE,�3_4Z
ANNUAL
HA�ARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS
2
2
K
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1st RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE,
.2qd RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
I
EXTENSION
GRANTED TO:
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
DATE DUE:
VIOLATIONS
CITED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
I
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
1 5
VIOLATIONS
1 5
PRE -CITATION
LETTER SENT
CITATION ISSUED
NUMBER:
4
.2
6
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION:
5
3
7
.2
3
7
RETURN RECEIPT
RECEIVED
6
4
.8
4
18
DATE:
DISPOSITION:
7
LETTER NEEDED [] YES NO
LETTER NEEDED F] YES NO
I
I
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
4) C. 1 B(P
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5th AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
www.admondswa.gov
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
December 19, 2012
Lakeshore Investment Corp.
P.O. Box 4184
Bellevue, WA. 98009-4184
Case: # BLD2012-0424
Subject Property: Single family residence at 10435 226 1h St. S.W. (parcel # 27032500309400),
Edmonds, WA. 98020
DAVE EARLING
MAYOR
The City has recently completed the final inspection for your single family residence remodel. Because of continuing
violations of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) regarding the use of this building, the City is
outlining some of the permitted, restricted and regulated activities. This information may answer some questions and
prevent future violations. This information does not include all permitted, restricted and regulated activities but, as
always, staff is available to answer any questions you may have. Please note that it is always more time and cost
efficient if questions are asked before any non -typical or secondary residential uses are pursued.
The following definitions from the Edmonds City Code (ECC) and ECDC are pertinent when considering activities that
may be non -typical or secondary for residential use.
21.105.02OUse. Use means the purpose land or building or structures now serve orfor which they are occupied,
maintained, arranged, designed, or intended (See also, Accessory Use, Conditional Use, Commercial Use, Permitted
Use, Primary Use, Private Use, and Secondary Use)
21.15.070 Commercial use. Commercial use means an activity with goods, merchandise, or servicesfor sale or rent.
21.80.070 Primary use. Primary use means the principal use ofa property. (See also, Use)
2 1.90.010 Secondary use. Secondary use means a use ofa site which is secondary and subordinate to the Vrifna!Y
use of the site, and may exist only when a primary use is existing on the same lot. Thefloor area devoted to all
secondary uses shall be less than that devoted to the primary use.
ECC4.72.010: B.Business. The term "business" includes -all services and activities engaged in with the object of
pecuniary gain, benefit or advantage to the person, or to any otherperson or class, directly or indirectly, whether part-
time orfull-time, except those businesses or occupations which are regulated pursuant to, orfor which licenses or
franchises are required by, thefollowing chapters of the Edmonds City Code: ... ... .
The building is a single family residence and is currently permitted for single family residential use only. The building
is not to be used for any commerciallbusiness use in association with the FIVE Restaurant or independently for,
including but not limited to, association meetings, commercial storage, party rental, food/drink service or office
activities.
If you have any questions or need any information please call me or the appropriate division at 425-771-0220. Thank
you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.
Sincerely,
Mike Thies
Code Enforcement Inspector
thiesO_ci,edmonds.wa.us
C. Fire, Planning, Building, Engineering, street file
Resident -10435 226" St. SW, Three Graces I LLC, Three Graces 2 LLC, Ted Clark @ FIVE
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
CITY OF EDMONDS
CITY HALL - THIRD FLOOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH * EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0247 * fax (425) 771-0252
www.edmondswa.gov
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
December 18, 2012
Merwil Guzman
Washington State Liquor Control Board
P.O. Box 43075 -
Olympia, WA 98504
Dear Merwil,
Please accept this letter of non -objection for Five RestaurantlBistro to have a catering
endorsement added to their current WSLCB Liquor License #405-423.
Ted Clark
206-227-1593
Five Restaurant/Bistro
LM 1650, LLC
#405 423
650 Edmonds Way -
Edmonds, WA 98020
if you have any questions or concerns, please contact my office.
Sincerely,
David 0. Earling
Mayor
N
DAVE EARLING
MA'�OR
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
"John'j. Westfall
From: Grassfield, Steven K [skg@LIQ.WA.GOV]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:54 AM
To: John J. Westfall
Subject: RE: Catering Endorsement and Banquet Permit
(6)(a) The board may issue a caterer's endorsement to this license to allow the licensee to remove the liquor stocks at the licensed premises, for use as liquor for sale and service
at event locations at a specified date and, except as provided in subsection (7) of this section, place not currently licensed by the board. If the event is open to the public, it must be
sponsored by a society or organization as defined by RCW 66.24.375. If attendance at the event is limited to members or invited guests of the sponsoring individual, society, or
organization, the requirement that the sponsor must be a society or organization as defined by RCW 66.24.375 is waived. Cost of the endorsement is three hundred fifty dollars.
(b) The holder of this license with a catering endorsement shall, if requested by the board, notify the board or its designee of the date, time, place, and location of any catered
event. Upon request, the licensee shall provide to the board all necessary or requested information concerning the society or organization that will be holding the function at which
the endorsed license will be utilized.
(c) The holder of this license with a caterers endorsement may, under conditions established by the board, store liquor on the premises of another not licensed by the board so
long as there is a written agreement between the licensee and the other party to provide for ongoing catering services, the agreement contains no exclusivity clauses regarding the
alcoholic beverages to be served, and the agreement is filed with the board.
(d) The holder of this license with a caterer's endorsement may, under conditions established by the board, store liquor on other premises operated by the licensee so long as the
other premises are owned or controlled by a leasehold interest by that licensee. A duplicate license may be issued for each additional premises. A license fee oftwenty dollars shall
be required for such duplicate licenses.
From: John J. Westfall [ma i Ito: iwestfa I I (&fired istrict Lorg]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:22 PM
To: Grassfield, Steven K
Subject: Catering Endorsement and Banquet Permit
Steve:
Thanks for information and assistance in the Five Restaurant matter.
Yes, please send me information on Banquet Permits and Catering Permits so I may better understand his limitations. I am confident Mr. Clark will look for ways
around those requirements.
John I Westfall
Fire Marshal
Fire Prevention Services
425-771-0213 Desk
425-775-7721 Fax
425-231-3644 Mobile
*John J. Westfall
From: Grassfield, Steven K [skg@LIQ.WA.GOV]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:19 PM
To: John J. Westfall
Subject: RE: Catering Endorsement and Banquet Permit
Hi John, below is information on banquet permits. I am checking on the catering endorsements and I will send the information as soon as I can.
Banquet Permits
Applying for a Banquet Permit Online
A banquet permit is a permit you apply for that allows the service and consumption of liquor at a private, invitation -only banquet or gathering held in a public place or
business. Examples include weddings, company banquets, retirement parties, and club, organization or church events.
a Order your banquet permit online here.
FAQ's and Information on Banquet Permits
0 What does the permit cost?
Banquet permits cost $10 per day for your event, so, a three day events costs $30. Note that you will need an email address and a credit or debit card to complete
this transaction. If you do not find the email with attachment in your inbox, please check your "junk" or "spam" folders before contacting WSLC13 Licensing
Customer Service Desk for support.
Important information about banquet permits
o All banquet permit sales are final
• No refunds will be issued
• Banquet permits are available to for -profit businesses, societies, organizations, and individuals
• Retail liquor licensees may not obtain banquet permits
• Attendance must be by invitation only
1
o The event may not be open or -advertised to the public
o Liquor must be free of charge, or brought by individuals attending the event. No separate or additional charge may be made for liquor, and donations
cannot be accepted
• The event cannot be for business promotions
• Liquor must be purchased from a retail store at full retail price
• Package deals are allowed that may include, for example, the cost of dinner, liquor and entertainment. To ensure participants receive an equal share,
tickets exchangeable for drinks may be issued as part of the package price. No profit may be made from the packaged deals
• Rental facilities or halls may require a banquet permit
• You must obtain any required permits from your local authorities when you host an event in a public place
0 A banquet permit is not required when all of the following apply:
1 . The event is hosted by an individual, not an organization or business entity
2. Guests are not charged for admission or anything provided at the function (e.g. ice, setup, food, hors d'oeuvres, etc.).
3. "Charge" includes donations, dues, fees, or otherwise
4. The event would normally be held in the individual's private home, but is so large that a separate facility is needed to accommodate it
5. The facility where the event is held is closed to the general public during the event and does not have a liquor license
6. There is no business purpose for the event or any financial gain
What does the Liquor Control Board do with my banquet permit?
When you purchase your banquet permit online, an email copy of it is sent to your local liquor enforcement office. Officers can visit gatherings, so it is important
that you sign and post a copy of your permit at the location where you will be serving the alcohol at your event.
Who do I contact with questions about banquet permits?
For questions, call the Licensing Customer Service desk at (360) 664-1600 (select option 1).
From: John 3. Westfall [mailto:jwestfall(cbfiredistrictl.org]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:22 PM
To: Grassfield, Steven K
Subject: Catering Endorsement and Banquet Permit
John J. Wesffall
From: Westfall, John flohn.westfall@edmondswa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:47 PM
To: Yarberry, Leonard; Thies, Mike; Bjorback, Leif
Subject: Ted & Catering License
Attachments: 20130115143334.pdf
Note he's not using the "city -assigned" address for the house, but the assessor address that coincidentally is for the restaurant also. There would
have been no reason for Mayor to OBJECT to this due to the plausability that this may be occurring at restaurant or catering to other locations.
Also note, this was written 4-5 days after the WSLCB agent fined him in December.
Johyn
Washington State
Liquor Control Board
PO Box 43098, 3000 Pacific Ave. SE, Olympia WA 98504-3098, (360) 664-1600
01 W� ME www.liq.wa.gov Fax #: (360) 753-2710
November 08, 2012
Dear Local Authority:
RE: Liquor License Renewal Applications in Your Jurisdiction - Your Objection Opportunity
Enclosed please find a list of liquor -licensed premises in your jurisdiction whose liquor licenses will expire in about 90 days�
This is your opportunity to object to these license renewal requests as authorized by RCW 66 .24 . 010 (8) .
1) Objection to License Renewal
To object to a liquor license renewali fax or mail a letter to the Washington State Liquor Control Board (WS!_CB) Licensing
Division. This letter must:
o Detail the reason(s) for your objection, including a statement of all the facts upon which your objection or objections are
based. You may include attachments and supporting documents which contain or confirm the facts upon which your objections are
based.
0 Please note that whether a hearing will be granted or not is within the Board's discretion per RCW 66.24.010 (8)(d).
Your letter or fax of obJection-MUSt be received bv the:goard's Licensing Division at least 30,days prior to the license
expira ion date. It you need additional time you must request that in writing. Please be aware, however, that it is within
the Board's discretion to grant or deny any requests,for extension of time to submit objections. Your request for extension
will be granted or denied in writing. If objections are not timely received, they will not be considered as part of the
renewal process.
A copy of your objection and any attachments and supporting materials will be made available to the licensee, therefore, it is the
Local Authority's responsibility to redact any confidential or non-disclosable information (see RCW 42.56) prior to submission to
the WSLCB.
2) Status of License While Objection PeRdin
During the time an objection to a renewal is pending, the permanent liquor license is placed on hold. However, temporary
licenses are regularly issued to the licensee until a final decision is made by the Board.'
3) Procedure Following Licensing Division Receipt of Objection
After we receive your objection, our licensing staff will prepare a report for review by the Licensing Director. The report
will include your letter of objection, as well as any attachments and supporting documents you send. The Licensing Director
will then decide to renew the liquor license, or to proceed with non -renewal.
4) Procedure if Board Does Not Renew License
It the Board decides not to renew a license, we will notify the licensee in writing, stating the reason for this decision. The
licensee also has the right to request a hearing to contest non -renewal of their liquor license. RCW 66.24.010 (8)(d). If the
licensee makes a timely request for a hearing, we will notify you.
The Board's Licensing Division will be required to present evidence at the hearing before an administrative law judge to
support the non -renewal recommendation. You may present evidence in support of your objection or objections. The administrative
law judge will consider all of the evidence and issue an initial order for the Board's review. The Board members have final
authority to renew the liquor license and will enter a final order.announcing their decision.
5) Procedure if �Board. Renews Ll'cense Over 'Your Objection
It -,he,.,BoarO decides. to renew -,he licance over your objection, you will be notified in, writing. At that tine, you may be
I g ly . on I an opportu6ity to roqu . a I st . 6, nee r in 1, 9 A o'ppoirtun-ity for a hearing _�s o�ferea at the Soard?e diicroi�on. If .1 hearing
is held, jou will be r4spipns,'161 I for- pr�o s;nt'i'ng evide'fice 'before an Adm�inistrative Laii,Jvd ; ge in supper-, of your otijectich to
.license renewal. ThelOolard's Lic e ns i ng Division will presenr'evidence in support or license renewil. The Licensee may
also participate and present evidence if xho�:licensoe desires. The administrative law,judge will�consider all'of the evidence,
And, issue an initial order -for the Soard'.s review. The Board members have final authority to renew the 1.1quor license �aln.d�
will enter a fi6al or,dor:, announcing -,h'oi,r decision.
For quasttons atiout this process, contact the WSLCS Licensing Divisfon at (360) 6.64-1600 or onall us: a-, tvslcb@liq.wa.gov.
'Sincerely,
A&n E. kathbun
Alan E. Rathbun -Director,
Licensing and �;.qulaii�on Division
LIO $64 07110
Page 1 of I
Westfall, John
From: 13jorback, Leif
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 4:58 PM
To: Yarberry, Leonard; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike
Subject: FW: Fives/Ted Clark
I haven't been successful yet in contacting Matt, but am sending this along as an FYI.
Leif Bjorback
Assistant Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220 x1 380
From: Matt Cruz [mailto:mattc@beresfordlaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:55 PM
To: Bjorback, Leif
Subject: Fives/Ted Clark
Hi Leif:
This message follows my earlier voice message. I understand you are away from the office for lunch, but I thought I would
introduce myself and let you know why I am calling.
First, I am sure you know my step -mother, Cindi Cruz. The only reason I mention Cindi is to make sure you are not caught
off guard in case I end up representing Ted and his partner(s) in this matter
Second, I have not agreed to represent Ted and his partners at this point. Ted called my partner, Dick Beresford, late this
morning to get some help figuring out what he needs to do to obtain a final occupancy permit for the residence located at
10435226 th St 5W, Edmonds. I understand you are familiar with this project. I also understand a Yellow Tag Notice has
been issued until all necessary inspections have been completed satisfactorily.
Ted was unable to tell me with specificity what exactly needs to be completed by him in order to request final
inspections. I suspect the City has made its requirements clear, but Ted is not clear and that is why he contacted us.
Before we agree to represent Ted or anyone else, I was hoping to speak with you to get a better idea of what is going on.
Unfortunately, I am away from the office today, but I would like to speak with you today if possible. I can be reached on
my cel 206.399.8952.
Thanks, Leif.
Matthew J. Cruz, Attorney
Beresford Booth PLLC
145 Third Avenue South, Ste. 200
Edmonds, Washington 98020
T 425.776.4100
F 425.776.1700
E mattc@beresfordlaw.com
12/12/2012
Wesffall, John
From:
Westfall, John
Sent:
Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:31 PM
To:
Yarberry, Leonard
Cc:
Clifton, Stephen; Cruz, Cindi; Bjorback, Leif; Thies, Mike; Lambert, Jennifer; Mike Smith - Fire
District 1
Subject:
Five Posting: 10435 226th St SW
Lenny:
I posted both front and back door on the little house due to the apparent public assembly activities there on
12/5/12. The dual posting identifies both entries DO NOT ENTER and provide honest persons an opportunity
to respect the City authority and lack of compliance by propretor. Mike Thies was present for the posting and
took photos.
There was no existing order posted, as the order previously was handed directly to proprietor, Mr Ted Clark,
on 4/13/12. Mr. Clark has made some effort toward compliance but has not respected the previous order.
We notified Mr. Clark once the structure was posted today. Mr Clark told us this was not a Five event,
however, the advertisement, attached, tells different.
Also, Mr. Clark did share with us that once his compliance permits were finaled for the site and the structure is
again classed "R3 dwelling" that he will be free to offer his own private parties at his pleasure. We did not
entertain his rationalization and Mr. Clark continues to blame others for the activities in this house and take no
responsibility for the safety of his clientele nor responsibility for his below board business activities.
20121211155847.p FW: eBlast:Young
df (29 KB) Professionals...
John Westfall
Edmonds Fire Marshal
----- Original Message -----
From: Yarberry, Leonard
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:41 AM
To: Westfall, John
Subject: 5
John,
Check out the attached. Look familiar?
http://mvedmondsnews.com/20l2/l2/first-meeting-of-chambers-newly-formed-young-professionals-network-
group/
Leonard Yarberry
Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425)771-0220
Wesffall, John
From: Westfall, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:48 PM
To: 'business@edmondswa.com'
Cc: Clifton, Stephen
Subject: Young Professionals Meeting at 5
Ms. Kellam:
The building the YPN group is meeting at, hosted by Five restaurant has never been approved by the City for
commercial or assembly use. The city has re -posted today a DO NOT OCCUPY order on the building that has
not been observed by proprietor, Mr Clark. Mr. Clark obtained no permits or approvals to use this house for
public assembly for the business purposes he has conducted and continues to exercise there.
Extend my condolences, the YIPN must find another legitimate place for their meetings.
http://tnyedmondsnews.coml20l2ll2lfirst-meeting-of-chambers-newly-fortned-young-professionals-network-
group
John I Westfall
Fire Marshal
Fire Prevention Services
425-771-0213 Desk
425-775-7721 Fax
425-231-3644 Mobile
DO NOT OCCUPY
THIS BUILDING UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND
APPROVALS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
BUILDING ADDRESS: 10435 226THSTSW
TO OCCUPY OR USE ALL OR PART OF THIS BUILDING WITHOUT APPROVAL IS A
VIOLATION OF THE BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS
BUILDING OFFICIAL
2, / // / / 2--
DATE POSTED
Do Not Remove this Placard until Authorized by City of Edmonds Building Division
650 Edmonds Way
Page I of I
Westfall, John
From: Bjorback, Leif
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:16 PM
To: 'David Gilchrist'
Cc: DST; Janicek, Gina; Lambert, Jennifer; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike
Subject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
David,
Thank you for the update. I am passing this along to our other departments for their awareness.
Regards,
Lcif Bjorback
Assistant Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220
----- Original Message -----
From: David Gilchrist [mailto:david@dgilchristarchitect.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 1:31 PM
To: Bjorback, Leif
Subject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
Leif,
After considerable re-evaluation, given the site restrictions, land -use and engineering code
requirements for the proposed change of use for the house at 10435-226th St SW (650 Edmonds Way),
the project no longer meets the business model that Ted and his business partner were hoping to
achieve. The most viable way for them to proceed and recoup the investment that has already been put
into this project is to lease the structure as a single-family residence. Therefore the permit application
will be revised as necessary to bring the property into compliance with respect to the structure,
impervious surface area and fences, etc. as a single family residence. Once this work is complete, it
will be leased as a residence with no connection to Five.
I have a few questions for the city engineer and so will follow up with her, then revise the drawings as
necessary. From your perspective, we will be making the changes to the roof so that insulation can be
added and the structure braced/reinforced as submitted previously. Some changes will be made to the
plans —adding a shower and improving the kitchen —but relatively minor. This should not take long so
the revisions will be coming your way soon.
Regards,
David Gilchrist
8/9/2012
4MEMORANDUM
Date: July 5, 2012
To: David Gilchrist
From: Fire Marshal John J. Westfall 425-771.0213
Subject: BLD2012-0424 COU R3 to B Occupancy 10435 226 th St SW
This Review is conducted in accordance with 2009 IFC and Edmonds Community Development
Code. Fire Services provides the following comments for submittal:
1 . Previous maps show 10431 226t' St SW that will be confusing with 10431 226 th pi SW
across the street. For Snohomish County Assessor and emergency services, identify how
10435226 th St can be created on the same parcel as 650 Edmonds Way.
2. Resubmit for your use. I see email with new occupancy type and use. If front end area is
intended to be a banquet area, call out BANQUET AREA. Specifically, applicant tells city
what he wants to do not what is assumed the city will agree to.
3. If this space will be leased, provide lease agreement for evaluation of requirements and
responsibilities for use.
4. Provide furniture plan for egress.
5. For existing fireplace in A2, open flame is not allowed in Assembly occupancies. IFC
308.3
6. Post occupant load in places of assembly.
7. Provide minimum 2A:10B:C listed portable fire extinguisher.
8. Post approved address on building minimum 6" letters with 3/4" stroke with contrasting
background, that is legible and viewable from access drive.
City of Edmonds Sb Office of Fire Marshal
.650 Edmonds Way
I
Page I of 3
Westfall, John
From:
Bjorback, Leif
Sent:
Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:24 PM
To:
'David Gilchrist'
Cc:
Smith, Mike; Westfall, John
Subject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
David,
Mike Smith was also waiting for your clarification of use before completing his initial Fire review. I am
copying him on this message so he can read your statement below.
Leif Bjorback
Assistant Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220
----- Original Message -----
From: David Gilchrist [maiIto:david@dgiIchristarchitect.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:08 AM
To: l3jorback, Leif
Subject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
Leif,
It looks like we are still waiting for Fire review —unless that is part of your scope of work? Can you
verify the status ofthe Fire review?
Thank you,
David
From: 13jorback, Leif [ma i Ito: bjorback@ci.edmonds.wa. us]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 8:53 AM
To: David Gilchrist
Cc: Yarberry, Leonard
Subject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
Hi David, please find the attached building division comments for the project. Feel free to contact me if
you have questions.
Leif B.iorback
Assistant Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220
----- Original Message -----
From: David Gilchrist [Mai Ito: david @dg i Ich rista rch itect. com]
7/6/2012
650 Edmonds Way
i
Page 2 of 3
nt: Monday, July 02, 2012 9:19 AM
: l3jorback, Leif
bject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
Vell we are back on track with this project. I ain working on. responding to engineering and other
omments this week.. Responding to your qUestion below, as you know the project has evolved as Ted
nd his business partner have been trying to settle on the best use for the structure frorn a business
ZD
oint of view that can. be developed within the Edmonds codes. The intent that we submitted for with
iis permit is that the structure is will. be used as a general. office —leasable to an third party such as an
ttorney or accountant, etc.. The occupant load that I put on the floor plan was based on. an openfloor
Ian office space should the tenant have a staff party or other such gathering. It is not intended flor that
iat would be the typical use ofthe space. If you would like that number revised., then I will change it
n the plan to match the general business occupant load. Let me know what you think-.
ZD
you,
vid
)m: Pjorback, Leif [mailto.:Worback@ci.edmonds..wa.us]
nt: Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:59 PM
David Gilchrist
Yarberry, Leonard
bject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
David,
I am currently reviewing your application for the conversion of the house to office use and a
clarification is needed before I can complete my review. What is the intended use of the
building? If it is to be general office use, the occupant load factor to use is 100 square feet
per person, which calculates out to an occupant load of 7; but as a conference room, a factor
Df 15 equates to an occupant load of 44, as you show on the floor plan. In our previous
discussions, it has been the City's understanding the use would be general office. This
distinction is necessary because the intensity of the use will impact City requirements for
parking, number of restrooms, structural design of the floor, and possibly more.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Leif B.jorback
b,ssistant Building Official
.ity of Edmonds
'425) 771-0220
----- Original Message -----
From: David Gilchrist [ ma i Ito: david (a)dq ilch rista rch itect. com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:31 PM
To: l3jorback, Leif
Subject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
Leif,
7/6/2012
650 Edmonds Way
w
Page 3 of 3
have been checking the online pen -nit status, but it is hard to decipher what if anything is happening
i1th our pen -nit application. Can you give me an update on your review'�
You,
n: l3jorback, Leif [mailto:�jorback@ci.edmonds.wa.us.]
t: Thursday, June 14, 2012 4:54 PM
David Gilchrist
ject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
ivid, I glanced at the plan after it was submitted but have not spent any time with it yet. I should get
it early next week. Our computer shows that the other reviewers have not gotten to it either.
Leif.Bjorback
Assistant Building Official
City of Edmonds -
(425) 771-0220
Original Message -----
n: David Gilchrist [miaiLltQ:david@dgilchristarchitect.com1
t: Thursday, June 14, 2012 12:35 PM
13jorback, Leif
ject: RE: 650 Edmonds Way
an.1 checking in to see ifthe permit application -For 650 Edmonds way has made it to your desk
et —and to see if you had any questions or could offer a status report on it.
5-417-8492
7/6/2012
650 Edmonds Way
Page I of I
Westfall, John
From: Bjorback, Leif
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:39 AM
To: Yarberry, Leonard; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike; Coccia, Gina; McConnell, Jeanie; Lambert, Jennifer; Thies, Mike
Subject: FW: 650 Edmonds Way
Here is the latest from FIVE. Leonard and I are thinking we should regroup in-house for a discussion since we
haven't compared notes since the DRC. Are you available Wednesday afternoon, Thursday or Friday? Please
advise.
Leif 13jorback
Assistant Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220
----- Original Message -----
From: David Gilchrist [mailto:david@dgilchristarchitect.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:02 AM
To: l3jorback, Leif
Cc: 'Cory Fraser'
Subject: 650 Edmonds Way
Leif,
I would like to update you on the progress of my work with Ted regarding the house on the 650 Edmonds Way
property. We have been considering Ted's options for bringing the structure and site into conformity with
Edmonds codes. After considerable thought, the option of developing the lot as Ted had hoped is not financially
feasible at this point due to the site issues that we discussed last week —parking, site engineering, etc.. In fact it
may not be feasible at all due to the constraints of the site.
Our plan moving forward from here is to follow through with a Change of Use permit for the single-family
structure so that it can be used as a support space for FIVE —providing primarily administrative office and storage
space. This is a Business use and has a minimal parking requirement which means that much of the site*that is now
gravel can be returned to pervious landscaping, and a relatively small area of the lot will be paved for access and
parking.
In order to obtain the Change of Use permit, I will document the existing structure and alterations proposed that
will bring it up to necessary standards for a Business Occupancy. We have met with a structural engineer, Cory
Fraser of LFD Structural Engineering, and have started the process of addressing the structural issues. Cory is cc'd
on this email and would like to start a dialogue with you about how best to handle the structural improvements to
this structure —he will follow up via phone or email.
Thank you for your help on this. I am hoping to have the Change of Use permit application ready in the next week
or two.
Regards, S-,V-W
David Gilchrist 6
425-417-8492
5/15/2012
Bjorback, Leif
From: Bjorback, Leif.
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:30 AM
To: 'Theodore Clark'; Smith, Mike
Cc: Yarberry, Leonard
Subject: RE: FIVE Restaurant I Bistro
Hi Ted,
Thank you for sending the information on the tarp covering materials. The image of the certificate that you
attached shows compliance with the applicable code standards for fire retardance. As such, we at the city will
allow the covering to remain in place for the time being. However, we ask that you find a permanent solution to
the situation in order to provide for your needs in the long term. We ask that by April 1 st, you will either
remove the covering or apply for the appropriate permits to make necessary alterations that would allow you to
continue the use of the covering. We will be glad to continue working with you to find an approach that is
compliant with city codes.
Also, Mike and I would like to meet with you on site in the next few days or so to take another cursory look at
the tarp installation, as well as discuss your upcoming fundraising event scheduled for late February. Plea.se
let us know a time that will work for you.
Regards,
Leif Bjorback
Assistant Building Official
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220
• ----- Original Message-,----
• From: Theodore Clark [mailto:fiveedmonds@me.com]
• Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:00 AM
• To: Bjorback, Leif; Smith, Mike
• Subject: FIVE Restaurant I Bistro
• Hello Leif. This is what I got from the vinyl guy. I can bring you
• the hard copies today. I don't think I have Mike's new email address.
If you could forward this to him, I would be'grateful..
• As far as our meetings go... I feel a room full of frustration. You
• were all just trying to do your jobs and I see that when things like
• this happen, it makes it difficult. As I stated in th * e meeting, this
• was not covered to go against you or any codes. In fact, we took great care to make sure that it not only
wasn't a permanent cover, but that
• the net result would not be dangerous. I asked the guy about fire retardant
• materials because I don't like hurting my friends and family any more
• than you do. I made sure that he told me that it would hold a snow
• load. I made sure that he did not attach it with screws or even
• nails. Zip ties are very temporary. If I would have wanted to make
• it permanent, I would have had a contractor put hard translucent
• plastic up and it would have been far cheaper and looked much better.
• The point is, we are all just trying to get through this. If I can
• just keep my tables and chairs dry for the rest of the winter, I will
• pull it off in the spring. I have not, and will not seat a person out
• on that patio though I will continue to use it as my workspace for me
> personally. Please let me know what else I can do until I reapply for
> a new design later this year.
> Sincerely,
> Ted Clark
CERTIFICATEOF
FLAME
RESISTANCE
TRADE NAME
FLAME-RES19TAJ�T'FABRIC
160z F/R,CLEAR
TENT TOP
This is to certi6 that the materials described bellow -have been flame-retardan't treated..
(.or are inherently nonflammable) and were sup'plied to:
...Descriptiow. 6 1 16oz F/R ".Cle�r" Tent Top Laminate VA-fite
CANVAS SUPPLY
4711 BALLARD AVE N.W. styw:. ST1009K Item VL-LU 16-061-02
SEATTLE,,WA 98107
Color(s): Clearcialy"
Certification is hereby made that:
RECEIVED The articles described on this certificate have been made from a. flame -resistant Fabric
Registered and approved by the. California State Fire Marshal, equal to or exceeds.CSFM,
U
JAN-3 12012 NFPA 701..' Test 1. (Small Scale)l NF,PA-701. — Test 2 (Large Scale), CPAI-84, & NYC MEA
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COUNTER ....:.The Flame Retardant Process Used WILL I�QT Be Removed By
Washing And Is Effective For The L Of 7�hej F b *c
SEATTLE TEXTILE COMPANY Signed
Name of Applicator of Flame Resistant Finish I Certificati4C§i)e%c-i`alist J Scott.Kaczmarek Seattle Textile Company
This Certificate Expires on: 12/31/2012
r
This is to c rtify that the low have been flame-retardan.t. treated
e materials described be
1or are inbdxentl�f -nonflammable ) and were suvOlied to:
-Laminate I "Glo'ss" Finish
Dewription. 61" 146z "FAV' Tent Top
CANVAS SUPPLY..
'VL-LU13-061-80
4711 BALLARD AVE N.W. Style. ST1309K (G) FR Style:
SEATTLE9 W-A 98107
Color(s): Blatk
0 y
Certificati " a is hereb made. that:',
The articles describe this certificat flame-resis tant Fa. nc
RECEIVEP. d on e havebeen made from a bH
-exceeds. CSFM,
Marshal, equal to or
Registered and approved by the California State Fire
JAN. 1 - 201.2 Test 2 (Large Scale),� CPAI-84., & NYC MEA
- NFPA 701 Test'l (Small. Scale), NFPA 701
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COUNTER The Flame Retardant-Proce�ss Used WILL NOT Be Removed By,
n
SEATTLE Sig ed
i e. f The F
Washing And Is Effective For The Lif 0
TEX TI LE COMPANY n Com a=n
Name of Applicator of Flwne Resistant Finish Certificatio� S1 ittleTextaile
------------
-,,;1/2012
This Certificate 9xpires on:
Certificate of Flame ResisUnce - CANVAS SUPPLY VL-LU13-061-80 2012
AmazonLoca� Snohomish County: $25 to Spend on Dinner or $15 to Spend on Lunch Page 1 of 2
Snotiblinish County 11,,7 �,.qvp lip to -i5% inyour city Sign in I Help
24/7 AmazonLocal Support
Today'sDeal I YourVouchers (866) 395-2090
You're one click away fronn
personalized
deals
It ir�q
Renrie-mber Morn On May 13
Firldl tier thu perf(,,,A gift fllw� wutak pA,q
in our Mother's Day specials.
See deals for Mom
Nearby Deals
Snohomish County
$25 to Spend
I owards a Virgin
America I"Olind- r rip
F light I aket, by
June 13
$25 to Spend on Dinner or $15 to FROM
Value
Spend on Lunch $15
Five Restaurant Bistro Savings
Sold by Five Rv�t,mrejj it Bi.Yro $5 66%($10)
The Details
The location is tucked away, but the food is worth finding at this
i
hidden jewel on the Edmonds culinary scene Just $12 gets YOU
$25 to spend on dinner at Five Restaurant Bistro, where you
can savor a carne asada that the Seattle Thnes lauded as "...
deeply embedded with flavor." Or for $5, score $15 to spend on
TIME LEFT TO PURCHASE
lunch and try sandwiches on housemade flatbread thafs baked
fresh to
2 days, 13:48:02
order.
PI it) an urban e �poncncc for you and Your friends at this
167 bought
suburban gem. While you're there, peek into the private dining
room (pictured left) and give it some thought for your next big
event. But do it quickly — with this deal, it's not likely to stay
Your American Restaurants
Edmonds' best kept secret much longer.
preference
What You Need to Know
Like Neutral
Limit 1 voucher per option per customer
Limit 1 voucher per couple per table per visit
Dislike
Gratuity not included; please tip on the pre -
discounted total
Lunch hours are Mon -Fri 11 a m. to 2 p m
What's this? Edit preferences
Dinner hours start at 5 p.m. every day and go to 10
p.m. Sun-Thur and 11 p.m. Fri and Sat
Entire value must be used in one visit
Sh.;"-1 14r�WTl Email
Reservations are required and subject to availability
Available for use beginning on May 6, 2012
The amount paid for the voucher does not expire.
Location See large map
The remaining promotional value of the voucher
above what you paid for it will expire on May 6, 2013
Other conditions apply
1-3 of 22
Snohomish County Snohomish County
$100 to Spend on Chiropractic I-varn.
Auto c�3re Services I reltment. and
61
2nd 5
lvlas.�;ayo
650 Edmonds Way
Edmonds, WA 98020
425-563-71 `17
Get directions
http://local.amazon.com/snohomish/B007ZRGZFO?src=email&cid=em—dd-982-101—na—sI... 5/3/2012
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 1, 2012
To: David Gilchrist
From: Fire Marshal John J. Westfall 425.771.0213
Subject: PRE2012-0018 COU SFR-Banquet Hall 650 Edmonds Way
This Review is conducted in accordance with 2009 IFC and Edmonds Community Development
Code. Fire Services provides the following comments:
1. Project address is 10431 226 Ih St SW that is a secondary structure behind 650 Edmonds
Way.
2. How will owner regulate the occupant load? Will rentals be attended by business or
building owner representatives? Will contract language reflect occupant load?
3. Post occupant load in places of assembly area.
4. Existing hydrant spacing meets spacing requirements ECDC 19.25.055 C.
5. Post approved address on building minimum 6" letters with 3/4" stroke with contrasting
background, that is legible and viewable from access drive.
--�-A& / f
50-5 1 F- - I /-P L/e�?' ,
�( q0 10)
,�'q'60
City of Edmonds Sb Office of Fire Marshal
'STAFF NOTICE &ATTACHMENTS:
..DEVELOPMENTREVIEW COMMITTEE: MEETING
Date:
........ .. .
B PLANNING.
-To.'
From-.", Jana
';2012::,,"ll`
:MEETING DATE:- !WEDNESD" 'A Y�! �,'JPRE'2012;001 8.'.
�7
p
MEETING.TIME:�� hT.
i David*, Gilchrist;
`CONTACT:, .417.8492
,SITE* LOCATIOW 650, Edmond" ay
PkOJECT:: in I 4amily, resiftqd6j6ld� priv"ate'Arneeting/event hall,..,::
g,e:
0
ormatlo
Ott(,,
City of Edmonds
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
C)
Ln
Lu
Lu
CL
LLL ��A R K I N C.
PROPERTY LINE (140-)
EXIST. PARKING LOT
FOR FIVE AND OTHER
RETAIL BUSINESSES
EXIST. ROCK BED
N
SITE PLAN
1" = 20' 10431 226thAve.W Edmonds,WA
04.19.2012
David Gilchrist Architect
VICINITY MAP (1)
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT ADDRESS:
10431 226th Ave. W
EDMONDS, WA
TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
270500309400
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
EXIST. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO BE USED AS A PRIVATE
MEETING/EVENT HALL.
ZONING INFORMATION
EDMONDS ZONING: NB
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V
OCCUPANCY: A-2
AREA CALCULATIONS
EXISTING FLOOR AREA (UNALTERED):
1040 SF
MEETING ROOM (TABLES AND CHAIRS):
(NET) 664 SF
ACCESSORY SPACES (BATHROOM, STORAGE, MECH.):
(GROSS) 278 SF
OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATION:
MEETING ROOM 1/15 SF (NET):
44 OCCUPANTS
ACCESSORY SPACES 1/300 (GROSS):
1 OCCUPANT
TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD:
45 OCCUPANTS]
PARKING CALCULATION:
1 SPACE PER 200 SF (GROSS)
04.19.2012
David Gilchrist Architect
DO NOT OCCUPY
THIS BUILDING UNTIL APPROPRIATE PERMITS AND APPROVALS
HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FOR CONVERSION OF USE.
BUILDING ADDRESS: 650 EDMONDS WAY
TO OCCUPY ALL OR PART OF THIS BUILDING WITHOUT APPROVAL IS A
VIOLATION OF THEJ3UILDING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS
4-//-.:5 /17�
bAfl� POSTED
Do Not Remove this Placard until Authorized by City of Edmonds Building Division
Westfall, John
From: Westfall, John
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:28 PM
To: Yarberry, Leonard
Cc: Bjorback, Leif; McConnell, Jeanie; Mike Smith - Fire District 1
Subject: Banquet Hall for Five Restaurant 650 Edmonds Way
Lenny:
Attached are photos of the banquet hall as I viewed on April 10-11. 1 came across this while viewing egress
from Five Bistro outdoor dining area to the new parking area on the south side of property.
The yard area is provided from fence line to fence line with crushed rock for parking, no striping, no
landscaping. No treatments on windows allowed me in plain view to see into house with widely open front
room area. Approximately 50 chairs were stacked and set around portable tables. New flooring appears that
this is a new occupancy. A wet bar was identified through the windows in the NE corner of the interior banquet
room.
I
'Assessor site lists this as a 1040 s.f. dwelling. I see no permits related to this structure, however, it shares a
taxIot with the Five Restaurant Bistro, and with no separate identifiable address. No address for structure is
posted and it's accessed off of 226th St SW. Sno Assessor page:
https://www.snoco.org/proptax/(utzachiltmls4n55swu4ef45)/result.aspx?address=650`/�2AEdmonds�/�2A
Five proprietor Ted Clark told me that his business partner's partner(?) has used this structure on occasion for
private banquets. I indicated that this person needs a business license to operate such an establishment and
that city approvals such as change of use are required. I asked him if he had contact information for the
proprietor and he was not willing to share that with me, that he would make necessary contacts. Owner is
(Lakeshore Investment Corp/Strickland Trust).
I contacted Al Gosiak of Lakeshore Investment (206)525-6969 . Mr Gosiak indicated that he was the
responsible party for the property, and asked what the problem was. I shared that the change of building use,
no business license and no city approvals for proper conduct of on -site activities. Mr Gosiak told me that Ted
had been given the latitude to make changes to the property, including adding parking area. At the time, 3-4
months prior, the house was understood to be used only for storage. Mr Gosiak indicated that they spoke of
making offices, but not specifically a banquet hall. With that information, it did concern Mr Gosiak given the
,niedia attention to night club fires in the last few years. He asked me what I would like him to do about the
situation. I told him it was our intent to help Ted succeed in his business efforts, but what is most important if
he would encourage Ted to ask the right questions of the city, do the diligent work, and seek the proper
approvals before he makes any changes. I indicated that city will likely be posting the site to gather Ted's
attention and direct him to resolve these new issues. Mr Gosiak represents many properties for the Strickland
Trust within the city and is very supportive of city's efforts to get things done right.
Leif and I spoke over the situation to date. Leif suggests NOV and Order to Correct posting. Perhaps Building
or Code Enforcement would do this as Fire doesn't wish to be construed as lacking objectivity or sporting a
vendetta. That is not the case. We do have an outstanding list regarding violations at his outdoor patio area of
the restaurant since he has finally complied with Fire posting the permanent patio cover.
I've copied Jeanie for consideration regarding the crushed rock parking addition.
19 19
20120411 0003.3P 20120411 0002.JP
G (126 KB) G (123 KB)
John I Westfall
Page I of I
on
Snohomishftilno Government Information & Services
County4*
Washington
Structure Information
Close Window
General Description
Parcel Number 27032500309400 (R01)
Structure Class Dwelling
Structure Type I Story
Year Built 1926
Exterior Features
Foundation Cone or CB
Exterior Siding -Lap
ROOF Type: Gable Pitch Medium Cover Composition
Interior Features
Bedrooms 3
Full or 3/4 Baths 1 1/2 Baths 0
Heat Forced Hot Air
Fireplace Masonry fireplace
Floor Area
Floor I Base SF 1040 Finished SF 1040
Garage(s) & Carport(s)
None
Other Features
Close Window
http://www.snoco.org/app2/propsys/PropinfoO5-StructData.asp?parcel=270325003094OO... 4/11/2012
Property Summary
i
Page I of 3
SnohomishOnlino Government Information & Services
CountY4*&
Washington
Printable Version
Home Other Property Data Help
Property Search > Search Results > Property Summary
Property Account Summary
Parcel Number 127032500309400 1 Property Address 1650 EDMONDS WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020
Parties - For cha ges use 'Other Property Data' menu
Role
Pe cent
Name
Mailing Address
Taxpayer
100
THREE GRACES 1 LLC/THREE GRACES 2 LLC
PO BOX 4184, BELLEVUE, WA 98009-4184
Owner
33
LAKESHORE INVESTMENT CORP
PO BOX 4184, BELLEVUE, WA 98009-4184
General Information
Property
SEC 25 TWP 27 RGE 03 RT-98-) BEG SW COR NE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 TH N01*00 OOE 20FT TH
Description
S88*31 OOE 207FT TPB TH E 200FT TH N 150FT TH W 200FT TH S 150FT TPB 469/323 LESS W
60 FT
Property
Category
Land and Improvements
Status
Active, Locally Assessed
ITax Code Area
100216
Property Characteristics
Use Code
581 Eating Places (Restaurants)
Unit of Measure
Acre(s)
Size (gross)
0.47
lelated Properties
No Values Found
kctive Exemptions
No ExemDtions Found
If you wish to pay your property taxes on-line now, select one of the following options and press the
button "Add To Payment List". If this property is noted as "Delinquency" in the General Information
Status field, additional costs may be added monthly. At certain dates within the delinquency process,
all outstanding taxes, assessments, interest, penalties, and costs are due in certified funds. Make
Check or Money Order to "Snohomish County Treasurer". Send to Snohomish County Treasurer,
3000 Rockefeller Ave, M/S 501, Everett, WA 98201
Installments Payable
Tax Year
Installment
Due Date
Principal
Interest, Penalties and Costs
Total Due
Cumulative Due
S lect to Pay
2012
1
04/30/2012
1,714.04
0.00
1,714.04
1,714.04
2012
2
10/31/2012
1,714.05
0.00
1,714.05
3,428.09
Add To Payment List
View Detailed Statement Detailed information about taxes and all other charges displayed above.
,.Calculate Future Payoff Taxes, interest and penalty due on a specific future date.
https://www.snoco.org/proptaxl(rca2cw55rvcimi45n4dnq2vg)/result.aspx?address=650`/`2... 4/11/2012
Property Sunimary
Page 2 of 3
Statement of Payable/Paid For Tax Year: :2012
Distribution of Current Taxes
District
Rate
Amount
CITY OF EDMONDS
0.165130
50.86
CITY OF EDMONDS
2.160792
665.52
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 15
4.703291
1,448.61
PORT OF EDMONDS
0.115861
35.69
PUB HOSP #2
0.107668
33.16
SNO-ISLE INTERCOUNTY RURAL LIBRARY
0.499955
153.99
SNOHOMISH COUNTY-CNT
0.982332
302.56
STATE
2.378822
732.68
SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DISTRICT
5.02
TOTALS
11.113852,
3,428.09
Property Values
Value Type
Tax Year
2012
Tax Year
2011
Tax Year
2010
Tax Year
2009
Tax Year
2008
Taxable Value Regular
308,000
353,500
431,300
442,100
430,100
Exemption Amount Regular
Market Total
308,000,
353,500
431,300
442,100
430,100
Assessed Value
308,000
353,500
431,300
442,100
430,100
Market Land
274,800
316,300
373,400
321,500
311,100
Market Improvement
33,200
37,200
57,900
120,600
119,000
Tersonal Property
Levy Rate History
Tax Year
Total Levy Rate
2011
10.055936
2010
8.853980
2009.
8.193603
Real Property Structures
Description
Type
Year Built
More nformation
FIVE RESTAURANT BISTRO
Qnf2!��cial
1963
View Detailed Structure Information
1 Story Ir
Dwelling�
1926
View Detailed Structure Information.
Property Sales (since 7/31/1999)
Transfer Date
Receipt Date
Sales Price
Excise Number
Deed Type
Grantor (Seller)
Grantee (Buyer)
Other Parcels
STRICKLAND
LAKESHORE
1/1/2001
1/5/2001
$0
161004
QC
BARBARA
INVESTMENT
No
FRANCES*
CORP
STRICKLAND
LAKESHORE
1/1/2001
1/5/2001
$0
161005
QC
NANCY LOUISE
INVESTMENT
No
CORP
STRICKLAND
LAKESHORE
1/1/2001
1/5/2001
$0
161006
QC
LORENA MARY
INVESTMENT
No
I
I
ICORP
Property Maps
Neighborhood Code
ITownship
lRange
Isection
lQuarter
1parcel map
5604001
127
103
125
ISW
IView parcel maps for this Township/ nge/Section
_R4_
jDate lReceipt No. I Amount Appliedl
110/31/2011 10:04 16392856 1 1,779.901
https://www.snoco.org/proptax/(rca2cw55rvcimi45n4dnq2vg)/result.aspx?address=650`/`2... 4/11/2012
Property Summary
I I
Page 3 of 3
Printable Version
Developed by Manatron, Inc.
@2005-2010 All rights reserved.
Version 1.0.4043.25450
https://www.snoco.orglproptaxl(rca2cw55rvcimi45n4dnq2vg)lresult.aspx?address=650%2... 4/11/2012
r 'y
pI IZ.-Ik
--Z -L L -��
lk�
. Wesffall, John
From: McConnell, Jeanie
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:27 AM
To: Zulauf, JoAnne
Cc: Westfall, John; Yarberry, Leonard; 13jorback, Leif; Smith, Mike
Subject: FW: Banquet Hall for Five Restaurant 650 Edmonds Way
JoAnne,
I would like for you to take the lead for Engineering regarding this business/development.
Thank you,
Jeanie
From: Westfall, 3ohn
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:28 PM
To: Yarberry, Leonard
Cc: 8jorback, Leif; McConnell, 3eanie; Mike Smith - Fire District 1
Subject: Banquet Hall for Five Restaurant 650 Edmonds Way
Lenny:
Attached are photos of the banquet hall as I viewed on April 10-11. 1 came across this while viewing egress
from Five Bistro outdoor dining area to the new parking area on the south side of property.
The yard area is provided from fence line to fence line with crushed rock for parking, no striping, no
landscaping. No treatments on windows allowed me in plain view to see into house with widely open front
room area. Approximately 50 chairs were stacked and set around portable tables. New flooring appears that
this is a new occupancy. A wet bar was identified through the windows in the NE corner of the interior banquet
room.
Assessor site lists this as a 1040 s.f. dwelling. I see no permits related to this structure, however, it shares a
taxIot with the Five Restaurant Bistro, and with no separate identifiable address. No address for structure is
posted and it's accessed off of 226th St SW. Sno Assessor page:
hftps://www.snoco.org/proptax/(utzach*ltmls4n55swu4ef45)/result.aspx?address=650�/`2AEdmonds�/�2A
Five proprietor Ted Clark told me that his business partner's partner(?) has used this structure on occasion for
private banquets. I indicated that this person needs a business license to operate such an establishment and
that city approvals such as change of use are required. I asked him if he had contact information for the
proprietor and* he was not willing to share that with me, that he wouldmake necessary contacts. Owner is
(Lakeshore Investment Corp/Strickland Trust).
I contacted Al Gosiak of Lakeshore Investment (206)525-6969 . Mr Gosiak indicated that he was the
responsible party for the property, and asked what the problem was. I shared that the change of building use,
no business license and no city approvals for proper conduct of on -site activities. Mr Gosiak told me that Ted
had been given the latitude to make changes to the property, including adding parking area. At the time, 3-4
months prior, the house was understood to be used only for storage. Mr Gosiak indicated that they spoke of
making offices, but not specifically a banquet hall. With that information, it did concern Mr Gosiak given the
media attention to night club fires in the last few years. He asked me what I would like him to do about the
situation. I told him it was our intent to help Ted succeed in his business efforts, but what is most important if
he would encourage Ted to ask the right questions of the city, do the diligent work, and seek the proper
approvals before he makes any changes. I indicated that city will likely be posting the site to gather Ted's
attention and direct him to resolve these new issues. Mr Gosiak represents many properties for the Strickland
Trust within the city and is very supportive of city's efforts to get things done right.
Leif and I spoke over the situation to date. Leif suggests NOV and Order to Correct posting. Perhaps Building
or Code Enforcement would do this as Fire doesn't wish to be construed as lacking objectivity or sporting a
vendetta. That is not the case. We do have an outstanding list regarding violations at his outdoor patio area of
the restaurant since he has finally complied with Fire posting the permanent patio cover.
I've copied Jeanie for consideration regarding the crushed rock parking addition.
20120411 0003.3P
20120411 0002.3P
G (130 KB)
G (127 KB)
John J. Westfall
Fire Marshal
Fire Prevention Services
425-771-0213 Desk
425-775-7721 Fax
425-231-3644 Mobile
I mij