The URL can be used to link to this page

6907 MEADOWDALE BEACH RD.PDF11111111111111 12293 6907 MEADOWDALE BEACH RD TAX ACCOUNTIPARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver 0 Study Required 0 Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: 1-1)lg3ln PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: �0 GEOTECH REPORT DATED: La, IjI rd STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: /J. OTHER: LATEMP\DS'Ps\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc .:d- co I CD -0 a) �7-777-- 717. CITY of ED%NDS E St*E'R PERMIT For Inspection Call 771-3202 STREET Fl. LIN PERMIT NO. 07,645 -J Address of Construction: "I -- Property Legal Description (Include all eas Owner and/or Builder: Contractor & License No: Single Family Residence Mul ti-Fami I y Commercial -i!�- (No. of Units (No. of fixture Units L -4 A E - 0 V1510% Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No -?e Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes — (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK I certify tlTa-t L-b-ave read and shall comply Date with the items list0don the back. Permit Fee: Trunk Charge: — 2,-5-.00 Assessment Fee: Issued By: -1-76. Date Issued: ;7 Receipt No.: Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial Rejected: Reason —[Ta—te -Tn—itial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE White Copy - File Green Copy - Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant ;i::,- z ..Zj I I P\/.,Z N-v ��4'1' .ql Cj) C ATC$4 B AS I M: XD3 0 1 S-30 (0 k Tjt9r4Cw LsrNr.-rH WOUAL) _TVkrLKCH Cov":k ............................. . .......... _nc. UNK LKVjrL TA NCH 4FE&F p1pq C TEE W/ 4'LONG Lr--Gs SYSTEM CROSS-SECTION M I RAF� 1 50 0 X C_�F_ L-L-V I V L_ L_V-�— To 15fF_�� LA-YED i� W4,5�4E:P KO--r- ,Tq,El,C" COVER 3/4'- 1'/2" WASVAE:D G PIAV E I 4 01AM FrEqF P L2-1 -0 a TRENCH CROSS-SECTION IF WN ANDARD DRAINAGE PLAN INFILTRATION SYSTEM PAGE I OF 2 for location plan by phone date NOTES 1. Call Engineering Division (771-3202) for prebackfill and final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner(s). Preventive maintenance consists of preventing soil and other materials from entering trench during construction as well as after construction. Catch basins should be cleaned of floating material and sedime nt a � reu lar intervals (at least twi ce per ear). fft ie(v CITY OF EOFVIONOS 4 Or -WOWS-".- Q1V 'CV CQ I iUi 0, �IA Fz ICA 414: <30 el tie .:f,. Aft N7 r> V -11 41 MIl y4i� YI 4"..- 4- F54ME xi 91407 4* 141e4a 4/ .*4 V0141Y C v rS -visDixon onvers a rd DC Geotechnical Consultants January 30, 1980 Whiteley Jacobsen and Associates 2118 Third Avenue Seattle, -Washington 98121 Attention: Mr. Robert McClendon Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Edmonds View Property, Phase I Meadowdale Beach Road Edmonds, Washington Gentlemen: 80-5251-02 This report presents the results of our subsurface investigation con- ducted at the Edmonds View Property, a planned residential development. The si te i s 1 ocated near 172nd Street and Meadowdale Beach Road in Edmonds, Washington. The site encompasses approximately 12.5 acres. It is our understanding that project plans are to subdivide the property into residential lots, and construct roadways and associated utilities. Present plans call for the site to be developed in two phases. Phase I would consist of development of the southern approximate 5 acres and Phase II the northern 7.5 acres. At the present time, preliminary lay- outs for bot'h Phase I and 11 areas have been provided. This layout dated January 25, 1981 consists of 12 building areas in the Phase I area and 16 building areas in the Phase II area. In general, the building areas are clustered on the higher elevations. It is understood that the remainder of the area will be left in a natural state. Access into the Phase I area is presently planned via 172nd Street, while the access to the Phase 11 area would be via Meadowdale Beach Road. Converse Ward Davis Dixon. Inc 300 Elliott Avenue West Suite 150 Seattle. Washington 981 19 Tele;)h,--- 206 235-520-0 I It is our understAng that the proposed structurl9will be wood -frame and be both one and two stories in height. In general, the foundations reportedly will consist of poles based in drilled holes on the downhill side and some conventional wall footings for the uphill areas. The purpose of this study was to obtain subsurface information and develop geotechnical design and construction recommendations. The scope of services for this investigation was outlined in our letter of confir- mation dated January 20, 1981. Verbal authorization was given by Mr. Robert McClendon on January 13, 1981. The primary effort during this investigation has been directed toward the Phase I area; however, a limited overview of the entire development has been completed. Our scope of services in the Phase I area consisted.& the following: 1. excavation of approximately-18 hand -excavated test pits, 2. continuous logging of subsurface conditions, 3. obtaining samples of representative soils encountered in the test pits, visual classification of the soils encountered, 5.. engineering evaluation of field exploration results, 6. preparat-ion of a geotechnical report. A preliminary geotechnical evaluation of the site has been completed by our firm. The results of this evaluation were summarized in a letter report. dated December 29, 1980. For completeness, this report includes the basic information and findings developed in this previous report. Site Conditions The Phase I area is irregular in plan, approximately 700 feet in width in an east -west direction and approximately 700 to 900 feet in a north - south direction. The property is characterized by moderate to moderate- ly steep slopes. The steeper slopes are approximately 2H:1V (horizontal to vertical). The maximum amount of relief across the site is approxi- nately 189 feet. A maximum elievation of 380 feet occurs in the southern oortion of the Phase I area and the minimum elevation of approximately 200 feet occurs in the extreme northwest corner of the Phase II area. I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. -3- With the exception of an old logging road near the central portion of the site, there are no roads into the site. The higher portions of the site are covered by a moderately thick growth of second -Growth evergreen trees while the lower portions of the site are dominated by -deciduous trees and low brush. Geoloqv The subject area is located on an upland surface in the Puget Lowland. The Puget Lowland was invaded by continental glaciers during at least four separate periods during the Pleistocene Epoch. During these glacial and acconipanying non -glacial periods, a thick sequence of soils was deposited. It is estimated that these sqps reach thicknesses on the order of a thousand feet. The present surface characteristics and near -surface soils are the re- sult of the last period of continental glaciation which occurred between 15,000 and 13,500 years ago. It is assumed that these sediments are underlain by older glacial ly-rel ated soils. Field Exploration The subsurface conditions in the area of proposed development in the Phase I area were explored by means of excavating 18 test pits on Janu- ary 16 and 18, 1981. The test pits were excavated by hand, as the moderately dense growth of trees and irregular terrain prohibited the use of power -operated equipment. The depth of the test pits ranged 'in depth from a few feet to 6.5 feet. The locations of the test pits were concentrated in the building and roadway areas at approximate locations shown on Drawing 1. The test pits were excavated by a engineering geo- logist from our office who maintained a continuous log of the subsurface conditions encountered. Representative bag samples were secured for visual examination and classification. Summary field logs are presented at the end of this report. All soils have been classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. -4- Subsurface Conditions The near -surface soils which underlie the site were deposited during the last period of qlaciation, the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation. These soils (from oldest to youngest) are referred to as the Whidbey Formation, the Esperance Sand, and the Vashon Drift. The Vashon Drift is Composed of three separate units: advance stratified drift, glacial till, and recessional stratified drift. It appears that the only drift unit present at the site is the glacial till. Glacial till consists of a homogeneous mixture of silt, sand and gravel and was deposited direct- ly beneath the glacial ice. The subsurface conditions encountered at the te�O pit locations consist of a thin dark brown organic layer of forest duff which ranges up to a few inches in thickness. This surface layer is underlain by a layer of silty sand or sand which represents either a residual soil layer and/or slopewash. This layer ranges in thickness between approximately one to four feet and ranges between loose to medium dense. Underlying these soils is either a medium to very dense silty sand or medium dense to dense. sand. The denser silty sand unit represents glacial till and, based on our explorations, is restricted to the upper elevations of the site. The glacial till forms a thin cap over the underlying sand and is estimated to be on the order of ten feet in thickness. The underlying sand represents the Esperance Sand unit. The sand unit generally under- lies the steeper sloping portions of the site. The sand is underlain by the oldest unit, the Whidbey Formation, which is exposed in the lower slopes, along the extreme north property line of the Phase I area below approximate elevation 280 feet. The Whidbey For- mation consists of silt and clay with some interbeds of fine sand. With the exception of the. near -surface soils, all of the soils which underlie the site have been overconsolidated by glacial ice. Weathering of the near -surface soils has resulted in loosening of these soils. I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. The soils encounte* in the test pits ranqed fromifiqhtiv rroist to dry and no aroundwater was encountered. The static croundwater table at the site is anticipated to be in older granular soils which underlie the Whidbey Formation. HowEver, there is a perched qroundwater table which exists within the Esperance Sand. Because of the clean nature of the sand, surface water infiltrates rapidly, percolatina downward to the boundary -of the Whidbey Formation. The Whidbey Formation is sufficient- ly fined -grained so as to greatly reduce the downward percolation of the water. The result is a general downslope movement of the water above the sand -clay contact. Springs or areas of seepage generally occur where this contact intersects a slope. 'The approximate locations of the geologic boundaries are shown on Drawing 1. No areas of instability were noted durina our investigations of the site. On the steeper slopes there was evidence of a aeneral down - slope creep of the near -surface soils as evidenced by the bowing of tree trunks. Creep of these looser surface soils is -a nomal occurrence on steeper- slopes. DISCUSSTON AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations apply specifically to the Phase I area. Somewhat different subsurface conditions are anticipated in the Phase II area and should be examined in detail. On the basis of the information obtained durinq this investigation and our preliminary qeotechnical evaluation, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a qeotech:iical standpoint. The steepness of some of the terrain will restrict development without extensive grading. The major portion of the proposed structures will be founded on slopina cround and excavations into the hillside are anticipated. Footinqs and lower floor slabs should be supported on competent, uneisturbed noder- ately dense to ilense native soijs where exposed in the excavations. In areas where the lower floor will be above the existinq ground surface, Converse Ward Davis Dixon. Inc. -6- i- 1 the around surface it will be necessary to install foot ngs well bel on a relatively steep slope. A pole -type footing would be suitable at these locations. At locations where the ground is not steeply sloping, it should be possible to place compacted structural fill which would be suitable for support of spread footings and slabs-on-arade. Our following recommendations are general. We have reviewed the planned lower floor elevations for the proposed structures relative to the existing ground surface as shown on the topographic drawing. In our opinion, our recommentions are adequately complete to cover foundation design and construction of the proposed structures; however, if design changes are made such as changing structure locations or floor eleva- tions, it would be prudent to review our recoMEn%Ldations and their ap- plications. For each structure, it will be necessary to determine the required exca- vation and filling, and the foundation system. Site Preparation All areas within the limits of excavations or where fill is to be placed should be stripped to remove vegetation and debris. The vegetation and debris should be removed from the site or placed in non -building areas. No material should be placed on the hillside downslope from the proposed houses. It is important that the slopes not be disturbed by the con- struction. Surface water must be controlled so that it is not allowed to become channelized and spill down the slope. The preliminary plans indicate that the maximum depth of excavation will be approximately 17 feet. Based on our explorations, the soils in the excavations will generally be silty sands with some gravel. The upper two to four feet of soil is loose to medium dense and grades to dense to very dense below. We recommend that the contractor be made responsible for the stability Of temporary excavations. He is continually at the site and can evaluate the stability of the soils as they are exposed. I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. -7- Structural fill toosupport floor -slabs or footing'Pshould not be placed on the moderately to steeply sloping ground. Fills may be constructed on flatter slopes provided the areas to receive the fill area benched to provide a level surface to support the fill. A bench should be at least six feet wide and the difference in elevation between adjacent benchs should be two feet or less. All structural fill should be placed in layers approximately eight inches in thickness, conditioned to a mois-- ture content suitable for compaction, and compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density as determined by the ASRI D1557 compaction test. Fill slopes should be inclined at 2.5H:lv (horizontal to vertical) or less. Soil for structural fill should be free from Qi3§anic matter and debris and should have a granular texture free from clay lumps. There are on -site soils that are suitable and we recommend that soils containing a minimum of silt or clay be utilized as they will be easier to compact and less sensitive to moisture content. Foundation Support The proposed structures may be supported on conventional shallow spread footings or a combination of spread footings and pole -type foundations. We recommend that the foundation system be designed so that all hori- zontal forces, such a's those due to earthquakes, are resisted by the shallow spread footing portion of the foundation system. Shallow footings founded on undisturbed medium dense to dense soils may be designed for an allowable net bearing pressure of 3,000 psf (pounds per square foot). Suitable bearing soils were observed at shallow depths across the site in our explorations, generally two to four feet below the existing ground surface. Wall footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches and individual column footings should be a minimum of 18 inches wide. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. I A ( + d Y A where A = 2.34P SJb1 P = applied horizontal force in pounds S, = allowable lateral soil hearing pressure h, = diameter of pole h = distance in feet from ground surface to point of appl ication of P d = depth of embedment of pole in feet A value of 300 pounds per square foot may be used for the allowable lateral soil bearing pressure (S1). The diameter of the pole (bl) may be increased to the effective diameter of the hole provided the annulus is backfilled with low -shrink concrete. Shallow footings can resist horizontal forces through the horizontal passive pressure of backfill adjacent to the footing and by friction across the base of the foundation. Horizontal passive pressure may be calculated using an equivalent fluid weight (triangular distribution) of 250 pcf (pounds per cubic foot). This assumes the backfill is drained and compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D1557 maximum dry density. Resistance to sliding may be calculated using a base friction factor of 0.45. The. above values do not include a safety factor. A minimum safety factor of 1.5 should be used to design for resistance to sliding and overturning. Basement Walls All subsurface walls should be backfilled with a free -draining granular soil and foundation subdrains installed behind the walls to minimize the potential for hydrostatic pressure to develop. The walls must be sup- ported on dense undisturbed soil. Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. our recommended coria for footings founded in A of sloping ground are that the outside edge of the footing on the downhill side should be at least eight feet back from the face of the slope measured in a hori- zontal direction. Footings founded on structural fill may be designed for an allowable net bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Minimum size and depth of embedment are the same as recommended above. The outside edge of the footings founded on fill should be at least five feet back from the face of the fill measured in a horizontal direction. Pole -type footings may be utilized on sloping ground where it is not feasible to construct shallow footings. A pol ooting would be con- structed by*drilling a hole with a power auger�insertinq the pole and then backfilling the annulus area. We recommend the annulus, area be backfilled with low -shrink Portland cement concrete. Our recommended minimum depth of pole embedment below the ground surface is six feet. The base of the poles should have a minimum diameter of eight inches. Our recommended allowable bearing capacity for a pole embedded six feet is 18,000 psf. For a pole embedded eight feet, the allowable bearing capacity may be increased to 24,000 psf. The effective area of the foundation is equal to that of the base of the pole. The effective area of the foundation could be increased to the area at the bottom of the hole if a concrete footing was poured in the bottom of the hole to sup- port the pole. Such a concrete footing should be at least 12 inches thick. The foundation systems for the proposed structures will generally con- sist of a combination of shallow footings and pole -type footings. We recommend that the horizontal loads be resisted by the shallow footings. However, if pole -type footings are required to resist horizontal loads, it may be necessary to deepen the footings to greater than the minimum six-foot embedment depth. The following formula may be used to deter - nine embedment depth to resist horizontal loads: I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. The on -site sandylals described as t - he Esperance0nd unit would gen- erally be suitable for backfill behind walls. The silty glacial till soils present in the southern portions of the site should not be used for backfill behind walls. Backfiil behind walls should be placed in layers not exceeding eight inches loose thickness and compacted with relatively light vibratory equipment, to at least 90 percent of its maximum ASMT D1557 dry density - An 18-inch thick layer of impermeable soil should be placed on the ground surface and compacted to prevent surface water from seepinq down- ward into the granular backfill. The ground surface should be sloped to drain away from the wall. Four -inch di ameter perforated footing drains must be placed behind base- ment walls. The invert of footing drains should be at least 12 inches below finished interior floor grades and sloped to drain at a grade of at least 0.5 percent. Convenient cleanouts should also be provided. All 'perforated footing drains should be protected by a filter of drain- age sand and gravel. There should be at least four inches of this mate- rial below the drains, six inches alono the sides, and 12 inches above the drains. In addition, the filter material should extend upward, adjacent to the wall so that it is a minimum of 12 inches thick measured perpendicular to the wall. Our recommended gradation for filter mate- rial is: U.S. Standard Percent Passing, -Sieve Size by Dry Weight 1 1/2 inch 100 3/4 inch 70 - 90 No. 4 30 - 60 No. 8 20 - 50 No. 30 8 - 30 No. 50 3 - 12 Mo. 200 0 - 1.5 Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. We recommend that subsurface or retaining walls up to approximately 12 feet high be designed for horizontal pressures equivalent to that of a fluid weighing 40 pcf (triangular distribution). Surface Water The exterior ground surface should be sloped to drain away from the building and surface should either be paved or covered with at least 18 inches of imperviouls soil to inhibit surface water from infiltrating into the subdrains. It is our understanding that it is desirable to dispose of roof drainage in dry wells. We anticipate that this scheme-9111 work satisfactorily based on certain requirements. These requirements are as follows: 1) the dry wells be located in the Esperance Sand unit, 2) the wells should not be located on the very steep slopes, and 3) they should not be located in the proximity of the basement wall perforated drains. The use of dry wells will be somewhat restricted in the Phase II area, these are anticipated to generally be those areas underlain by the Whidbey Formation. We understand that the storm drain -system, relative to the roadways, will be designed to flow into a retention system. We recommend that the retention system have a controlled orifice and be tight lined away from the slopes. Summary This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation and development of this site for its intended use. The discussion of site development is conceptual in nature and must be refined to take into account final roadway grades, slope locations, and construction sequencing. It is recommended that we continue our involvement with the design engineers to assure that final site development plans and specifications are con- sistent with the findings of our investigation. I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. -12- - We recommend that site preparation, foundation excavations, fill place- ment and drainage installations be observed by personnel aualified by training and experience to see that the work is perfomed in accordance with these recommendations, the plans and specifications, and good engi neering practice. The findings and conclusions of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and prac- tice. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Please do not hesitate to call us if there are any questions regarding the conclu- sions and recommendations contained herein. Respectfully submitted, CONVERSE WARD DAVIS DIXON, INC. William S. Bliton' �Zoy' M. H0,9 Senior Geologist ....... Jack M. Hogan /STE Senior Engineer 'OUAL I Converse Ward Davis Dixon, Inc. i3�� Qvt . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . N W S E TP QW) EXPL Al"4ATION I Till QVT G I a c; /I L p -71 110 OE Espor--.nce Sand z j v /) \T � 11 1- i.4 — Q �-V V.111. ijey Formation ONIIA ;,Pproximiate Geologic )TA6 v" -7 T P� 2/ C c) r. 4, a c I �Q A 10 d�jtlej ,.,where 1 TP-1 Test P;1 'T e/, GEOLOGY AND EXPLOR/-'%T1O:\" 1-7 Co i i walv Ste Wa r d D s.-. v i s D i i Geofechn.cai co�%�i*'&ntz EDMONDS VIEW PROPERTY Edmonds, Washin,5ton for North,.I Eng L - ginc:ers . ".j C, — 80-5152-02 liIIIIIIIII11M 0 0 SUMMARY LOGS OF TEST PITS Test Pit 1 0.0'-0.2' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.2'-1.5' SM/SP RESIDUAL TILL SOIL, SILTY SAND, gray -brown, with orange oxidized layers, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble, trace organ- ics, few roots; slightly m oist, loose to medium dense. 1.5'-1.9' SM GLACIAL TILL, SILTY SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble to 6" diameter; dry, very de ,!p e . --------------------------------------------- :% ---------------------- Test Pit 2 0.01-0.11 SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.16-2.51 SMISP RESIDUAL TILL SOIL/SLOPEWASH, SILTY SAND, gray -brown, with orange oxidized layers, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobbles, trace organics, few roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 2.5'-2.7' SM GLACIALTILL, SILTY SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble; dry, very dense. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Pit 3 0.0'-0.2' SM F OREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.2-1.2' SM/SP SLOPE WASH, SILTY SAND, brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble, trace organics,some roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. i 1.2'-3.5' SP SAND. brown to reddish brown, with mottled gray streaks, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, little silt; slightly moist, medium dense to dense. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 Test Pit 4 0.0'-0.3' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.3'-3.2' SM/SP RESIDUAL TILL SOIL/SLOPE WASH, SILTY SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble, trace organics, some roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 3.2'-3.6' SM GLACIAL TILL (moderately weathered), SILTY SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium ------------------------------------------------------------------- gravel, occasional cobbles; dry, medium dense to dense. Test Pit 5 0.0--o.11 SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. O.V-2.8' SP/SM . SLOPE WASH, SAND, brown, fine to x,81-ium, with some silt, coarse sand, and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble, trace organics, some roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 2.8'-4.0' SP SAND, brown, fine to medium, with little coase sand and gravel, trace silt; dry, medium dense to dense. --------------------------------------- Test Pit 6 0.01-0.11 SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. O.V-2.7' SP/SM SLOPE WASH, SAND, brown,.fine to medium, with some silt, coarse sand, and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble, trace organics, some roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 2.7'-3.1' SP SAND, brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and gravel, occasional cobble, trace silt; dry, medium dense to dense. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Pit 7 0.0'-0.2' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.2'-3.4' SP/SM SLOPE WASH/WEATHERED SAND, SAND, reddish brown, fine to medium, with some silt, little fine to coarse gravel, some roots, trace organics; slightly moist, loose. 3.4'-6.5' SP SAND, brown to gray -brown, fine, with little silt and medium to coarse sand, trace fine to medium gravel; slightly moist, medium dense to dense. Page 3 Test Pit 8 0.0'-0.2' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.2'-2.5' SP/SM SLOPE WASH/WEATHERED SAND, SAND, reddish brown, fine to medium, with some silt, coarse sand, and fine to coarse gravel, some roots, trace organics; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 2. 5'-4. 0' SP SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, occasional cobble -------------------------------------------------------------------- slightly moist, medium dense to dense. Test Pit 9 O.Ol-0.31 SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to med�pm gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, 166se. 0.3'-4.5' SP/SM SLOPE WASH/WEATHERED SAND, SAND, reddish brown to brown, fine to medium, with some silt, coarse sand, and fine to coarse gravel, some roots, trace organics; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. (Includes zone of moderately cemented sand at 1.5'-2.5', possible Till layer.) 4.5'-5.0' SP SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, occasional cobble; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- slightly moist, medium dense to dense. Test Pit 10 0. 0'-0. 2' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel., organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.3'-4.2' SP/SM SLOPE WASH/WEATHERED SAND, SAND, reddish brown to brown, fine to medium, with some silt, coarse sand, and fine to coarse gravel, some roots, trace organics; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 4.2'-5.1' SP SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, occasional cobble; -------------------------------------------------------------------- slightly moist, medium dense to dense. Test Pit 11 0 0 0.01-0.11 SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine. to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.1'-3.0' SP/SM SLOPE WASH/WEATHERED SAND, SAND, reddish brown to brown, fine to medium, with some silt, coarse sand, and fine to coarse gravel, some roots, trace organics; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 3.0'-4.0' SP SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and. fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, occasional cobble; slightly moist, medium dense to dense. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Pit 12 0.0'-0.3' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium,.with little coarse sand, fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. Ap 0.31-3.31 SP/SM - SLOPE WASH/WEATHERED SAND, SAND, ti_�ddish brown to brown, fine to medium, with some silt, coarse sand, and fine to coarse gravel, some roots, trace organics; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 3.3'-4.1' SP SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand, and -fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, occasional cobble; slightly moist,'medium dense to dense. ---------------------------------------------------------- Test Pit 13 0.01-0-11 -SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous rootsi sliahtiv moist, loose. 0.11-1-01 SM/ML SANDY SILT, light gray, very fine to fine, with trace medium to coarse . sand and fine gravel, organics and roots; slightly moist, soft. I - _� . 1 1 1.0 SP/SM RESIDUAL TILL SOIL, SAND, brown, fine, with little medium to coarse sand, gravel, and silt, trace organics, some roots, occasional chunks of weathered hard till; slightly moist, medium dense. 3.1'-3.4' SP/SM GLACIAL TILL, SAND, gray -brown, fine, with some silt, little medium to coarse sand, and fine to c'oa'rse gravel, occasional cobble, slightly moist to dry, very di�nse. * --------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Pit 14 0 0.0'-0.3' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.3'-3.5' SM/SP SLOPE WASH/RESIDUAL TILL SOIL, SILTY SAND, brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand, and fine to medium gravel, trace organics, some roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 3.5'-3-6' SM/SP (As above, but harder, with chunks of till. Possibly top of -------------------------------------------------------------------- till but not sure because could not dig further.) Test Pit 15 0.0'-0.2' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND,.dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.2'-3.0' SM/SP SLOPE WASH/RESIDUAL TILL SOIL, SILT�. SAND, brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand, andt"Tine to medium gravel, trace organics, some roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 3.0'-3.3' SM GLACIAL TILL, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, occasional cobble; -------------------------------------------------------------------- dry, very dense. Test Pit 16 0.0'-0-.3' SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND dark brown, fine to medium, with ' little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. 0.3'-3.5' SP/SM SLOPE-,WASH/RESIDUAL TILL SOIL, SAND, brown, fine to medium, with little to some silt, little coarse sand, fine to coarse gravel, occasional cobble, trace organics, some roots, (with -------------------------------------------------------------------- chunks of hard till); slightly moist, loose to medium dense. Test Pit 17 0.01-0-11 SM FOREST DUFF, SILTY SAND, dark brown, fine to medium, with little coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, organics, numerous roots; slightly moist, loose. O.V-3.4' SM/SP SLOPE WASh/RESIDUAL TILL SOIL, SILTY SAND, gray -brown, fine to medium, with some coarse sanTand fine to coarse gravel, occasional cobble, trace organics, some roots; slightly moist, loose to medium dense. 3.4'-3.5' SM (Harder, probably till.) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Test Pit lul Road Cut SM GLACIAL TILL, SILTY SAND, aray-brown, fine to medium, with Sur1face Samaple some coarse sand, and ?Tne- to coarse gravel; dry, very dense. -------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF EDMONDS STREET HLE ASSET INFORMATION SHEET NEW ASSET NO. 2-"ADDITION ADDITION TO ASSET NO. RETIREMENT DESCRIPTION SERIAL NO. LOCATION I (�;' �� 1,;7 DEPT. NO. 1 *PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO, ESTIMATED LIFE I/, . "/ , - ': '- i - :i-/ PROJECT NUMBER - - '�- ; PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY dDEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT is G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE t�np INITIAL DEPARTMEN'r FILE VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO. STREET FIL��A 66 Odd ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST STREET FILE Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCIA', requires all govcrntnc*nt3l*agencics to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the cn%,ironmcni. The purpose or this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from thc'proposal, ir it can be done) and to help the agency decide A-hcthcr an EIS is required. instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental aocn- cics use this checklist to determine whcLh--r the environmental impacts of your proposal arc sipificant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best dc- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best or your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the ans-wer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about overnmental regulations. such as zoning. s&orelinc, and landmark desic'nations. Answer 9 =1 D these questions if you can. If you have problems, the government.al agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Atta�h any a.dditionaf 'information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checkiist may ask you to explain You; answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to dcLermining if Lhe-,z imay be significant advc-.sc impact. Use of checklist for nonproject pro.posa!s: Complete this checklist for nonoroject proposa!s. evcn though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN AD- 'TAL SHE'2- FOR NON?RLOIECT AC -LIONS (part D). -DITION, complete the SUPPLEMEN For nonproject actions, the rercrencts in the cineckiisL to dlic words "project," "applicant.,* and "property or site" . . . should be read as "proposal," "proposer.' and "afrcced scographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND Namc of propilsed project. if applicabic: 2. Name or applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant rson: A=>c:' Z5 if 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: 0 6. Proposed timing or schedule (Inclu pplicable): 157" �) 7. Do yo u have any plans for future additions. expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this propos al? If yes. explain. S. List any criViTorimcnial Information you kno%k about that has been prepalocor will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A, Do 3,ouA/no%k, whether applications ai'c--pcnding for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal' If x1cs. explain. I 10. List any government , approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) 9=1 -`7 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a pe-,son to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township. and range. if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a le,2al description, site plan, vicinity map. and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you arc not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this chec�list. 112 J e�Oc� -7 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description or the sitc (circle one): Flat, rolling. hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? :t -2- L -A TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What general types of soils arc found on the site (for CX3MPIC, Clay, Sand, gravel, pelt, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Arc there surface indications or hisigLy_.2f unst4_blc soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. EVALUATION FOR AGENC)' USE ONLY e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indica.te source of fill. X- "2 K/ 1!5� 95k.46— oc, r. Could erosio ur as a result of clearing, construction. or use') If so. aeneraltv describe. About what percent of the Site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)" h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or Other impacts to the earth, if any: ane 2. Air a. What types of emissions to Lhe air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust. automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during conSEruction and when the project is completed? If anv, aencrallv describe and aivc approximate quantities if known. r%J 0 11%, b. Are therc any',orr—iitc sources or emissions or odor that may arrect. your proposal'! If so, generally describe. tj C) c. Proposed measures to reduce: or control emissions or other impacts to air, ir any: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR 3. Water AGENCY USE ONLY a. Surface: 1) Is there an), surface water body on or in ihe immediate vicinity or the site (including year—round and seasonal streams, saliwaier, lakes, ponds, wc1lands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate. state what stream or river it nows into. Nj C� - 2) \Vill the project require any work over. in, or adjacent to (within 200 feel) the described waters? If yes, please des.cribc and attach available plans. 3) Btimate the amount of fill and dredoc material that would be placed in or removed Z .from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of rill material. C� 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give gencral de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. " C� 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100—year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. r- — C41 rZF_ 4r ak'4-.— Rj cl 44=s Ais=A c- ic- 2) Describe wafte material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; ctc.). Dcscribc the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number or houses to be served (ir applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 1-� CZ wjz� - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water now? Will this watcr flow into other waters? If so, describe. t�AL� L'_j &A-rr� <_-C=Ak er- CA-tA C5 K-- rr-_P<'(-MC&CL� pLcr 4- pLsw%_. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface. waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures -to reduce or -control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check.or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other -t,ever-reen tree: Fir, cedar, pine, other -X-shrubs _!!-.-,rass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, butIrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water Illy, celgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetacion will be removed or altered? L-i c. List threatened or endangered species known to. be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Przsf;C-S� -ATM. L-ea-� V'- e+*�rl'a'ks Ax�, f) I x�,. C_e 5. Animals . - a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: b S birds: hawk, heron. eagle, songbirds, other: .......... mtsawL ................ mammals: deer. bear, elk. beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish , other: ............................. b. List any -threatened or endangered species known to be an or near the site. rl 6 1-4— TO 14E COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USr-. ONJ.�' c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. r\p +- Pt>-.— b.% AAL d. Proposcd mcasurcs to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of cncrg� (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet C! the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heatinn, manu- facturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally i1scribe. --%_0 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: V -0" 0 Pl-.Q- 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Y-\0 M -C-- 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environment.al health hazards, if any: r) -4 4NcP1 % C_ ab Le, b. Noise 1) What types or noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment. operation, other)? VIL c, L-� . 2) What types and levels or noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? [ndi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. r\-6 --4__ f__ TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION' FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impicts, if any: V% 0 V-9-- P I M., C--C� 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of vhc site and adjacent properties? LC b. Has the site been uscd'for agriculture? If so, describe. ry c. Describe anv Structures on the site. r\—Cl P%-A- d. Will any structures be demolished" If so, what'? e. What is the current zonin!z classification of the sitel f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an *environmentally sensitive* area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: ri -M I C�- 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: r)=- T V I rC=j*,AeA*J —7— TO BL COMPLETED H) APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9. Housinc, b a. Approximate]), how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate v"hcther high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. 51 L, b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be climinaied? Indicate whether high, middle, Or low-income housing. CZ, r\,IE�Sj c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: n rc-- I u ir-CA 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest heiaht of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas-, what is the principal exterior buildinn material(s) proposed? r\-j b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? rl (!...N .0 b-,*r-u C-41 a k k c. Proposed measures to reduce or control acsthetic impacts, if any: bu -I 'q 6'e &�.4 1_4 U I �Aci V__Vz_ 11. Liaht and Clare a. What type or light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? M b. Co - uld light or glare from the Finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? C!S c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? rL 0 VNe- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? <-A - - I Pb%-�_) bte-S,-�84--c, b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. —8— TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to bc provided by the projcct or applicant. if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally dcscribe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, arch3coloRical. scientific, or Cultural imporzance known to be on or next to the site. V% (S- K-A.— c. Proposed measures to rtduc� or control impacts. ir any: Y\�o io,� r-V_-TJ % r—CA 14. Transportacion a. fde-iffy public iii-etis and highways se—.,tlnq the Site. and describe proposed access to the ex: lsz;n,2 szrtt� SYSze-n. Show on site plans. if any. "b. Is site currently served by. public transit'? If not. what is the approximate distance 10 the nearest transit stop'! c. How manv parking spacts would the completed project have? How many would the project c!iminaEc'? d. Will the proposal require unv new roads or surct—s. or improvements to existing roads or sLrct_,.,s. not inc!udlnu drivew4vs` If so. gcricrally describe (indicate whether public or priv--Ec,). YN1.0 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail. or air (ransporia- cion? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed pro"ect" If z J known. Inalcate w . nel pe�..k volumes would occur. r,_J r.. - 6-b-c-L t 4ve-, I TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: elofe(- rmad 4-tt> 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: Fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so. gencrally describe. ca b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. V% C=� 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities.cu- available at the sitc:�L�--Ckf6TTQLat��_, efuse serv- ic telephone sanitar s r, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the ocneral construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which miaht 0 0 be needed. C. SIGNATURE The above answers arc true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyl o on them to make its decision. Signature: .. .... ...... .................................. Date Submitted: ....... .................................. _10— TO III: ('0MI'LLTIA) BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY SM-PLEN11:111AL SMAJ FOR NONPROJECT A(MONS (Rezones , Code Changes , Annexations etc. (do no[ use this slicet for project actions) 11 cc:luse thcSc qtic�tions are very Cclicral, it ina), be helpful to rea(l them in Conjunction witit the lim of ilic elements ol"Ilic envirolifne"t. \\111co allswering tilese questions, be aware of the exiew the proposal, or thc.types or activities lik-cly to result from the proposal. would'afreci the item :it :1 gre.'Iter intcnsity or ;it -,I faster rate than if the proposal werc not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How . would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water: emissions to air: pro- duction, stora2e, or reilease of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? V- Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: n 4 C,4- 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine lire? M_ it, C4- Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: - - r-"-C:) I 1,,-p 1c, C.�- 4v- S lt� I 3. Flow would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources') Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: --.e- -A , b w 1*1 eA op, - TV- 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- ens designated (or eligible or under study) for novernmental protection: such as parks, wil- derness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species liabliat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, lloodplains, or prinie farrillands? Y%ab t:-5 Propoied measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: _p LIV I Cj— rot- - bcTt4 CA, 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclu ' ding whether it would allow or cricourage land or shoreline uses Incompatible with existing plans'? . Y-te, V-, --- 9 a,41 k:-e % TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shorchric and land use impacts arc: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demand,, on transportation or public scr- vices and utilities? 4== -(--k-4e Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) arc: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY CITY OF EDMONDS 2<NEW El ADDITION 1:1 RETIREMENT STREET F-ILE ASSET INFORMATION SHEET ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. — 1:5-X DESCRIPTION 0 - '09 _ _ SERIAL NO. LOCATION * * PURCHASE ORDER NO, PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST - zs'� 23 B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. ESTIMATED LIFE INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY /o" ff/DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE (YP) INITIAL VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO.- (Y 9 0 . 1 9 9 — ST El' F I L �ityofEdmo* RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 412 1J Li f I -L IZA VU VJ U L�W- 1:X-J+. rl;_u B. Type of Work (be specific): iNSTALL 01ST. iCA /k-LOkI& SLY SME- A4EA4)6WDALrL-J3".k:DT,6W C. Contractor: LJ4A-14PA-ZS1-'y'L"M(J)LC-A Mailing Address: -1533 MA40 s-r State License#: SUPE.P-C-C- 10 1 Q A. D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Contact:Z'-' K3 -JA-tJe-,6>l2-Ab WOA L- Phone: 774- S-14-& Liability Insurance: — Bond:$ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. F-1 Commercial F] Subdivision F1 City Project a& Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, <� WATER) F� Multi -Family E] SingleFamily F� Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: W�J'� F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : 91 Ye OMLY (F 50 D(C7ATff0 6 Y ;,2 0No G. Size of Cut: x 4- H. Charge$ LJTQ-17Y LO/-A'Te-5- APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfirom injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made against the C4y of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employ- ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorneyfees by reason of granting this permit. 77LE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AArD MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC77ON AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ES77MA TED RESTORA 71ON FEES WILL BE HELD UN77L THE FINAL S77ZEET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Department - Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. 7 -;,!!W Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read th above tements and uAde tand he permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available u o es. on site at all tKesf rl ionp zry - q ��p Signature: 7- \ (CUntractor or Agent) \�- Date: CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Engrg. Div. 1991 r- C -,- 1! " ; �' .;. - F '-' R I [i 19 013 ENG-INE,:; RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ROUTING FORM DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED rV - /-a - 1?3 WORK ADDRE CONTRACTOR ss— 6 �0 7 1. DATE TO PUBLIC WORKS FOR REVIEW REV/APP BY STREET DIV. d a t e �/,/ /f3 REV/APP BY WATER/S EWER_ .-date REV/APP BY PUBLIC WORKS date?-- 0, - 9 1 ""k -Co,- 2. DATE TO ENGINEERING FOR REVIEW REV APP BY ENG. AID date or REV/APP BY ENG. INSPTR. date 3. Return to Community Services front desk DATE PERMIT ISSUE PERMIT # ?3— k--v STRE City of Edmol 1AU11(P�-OF-WAY CONS, CTION PERMIT Permit Number: FWA L FA)4 Issue Date: 3 A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: —6 907 MEADOWDALV- Or -A. RZ. -%%knoopl- Cj 9 0 - 1 9 c� B. Type of Work (be specific) C. Contractor: 4MAMP49—R51SLJ1V-V09-e-A INSTALL 01ST. e-A ALOLIZa SLY SID& lAUMW DAL& X14. Q.D T6W Contact:'ZS-' R8 Jktk 6,12-AO tAJ0A L- Mailing Address: Sx 5 F4 Al Ii 5-r Phone: 774- 514-& State License #: -SUPEA C-C. 10 16) A. Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. n Commercial F� Subdivision Fj City Project X Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, (EED WATER) n Multi-Fan-ffly F] Single Family F-1 Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: LA.1� F. Pavement or Concrete Cut 91 ye G. Size of Cut: 2— x 4- H. Charge$ OMLY IF 501YCTATj'Z0 Y �2 []No UTIL17Y LOZATF—S APPLICANT TO READ AND.SIGN INDEMNITY. Applicant understands- and by his signature to this application, agrees to �o he City of Edmonds harmlrV am 'njj * d , lines, amages, or a? claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that maybe made . NIle City a dmonds, or my"of is d" arrAents or employ- fF ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorneyfees by reason of granting this permit. 7HE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC77ON AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ES77MA 7ED RESTORA77ON FEES WILL BE.HELQ UWX THE FINAL S7REET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT.'' 1 Construction drawing of proposed work required wi - th permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Pl�ase'caft the Engineering bepa'rtment- Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. 771-0220 Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and uVetstand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all ' es 2- S i gy n a t u r e kl\,n f( !s,,Pe`, u -rP, 7 - V Date: )��ctor or Agent) \_1 14 i CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Engrg. Div. 1991 FIELD INSPECTION I - Route copy to Street Elept.) . Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION 0 YES 0 NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 4 . . Z.1�307 MEAD6WCAL' Z-3- 93 PIW VA 6q15 oss EKIST DP -OP k-rPC D lool [%7ALL VEb K a ZS'A NEADOWDALL BCH'. RD, 5TKEET 1 N.5 TA L L 14-0' - , 5-0 0 P 3 U,(- t& .0 T 0 0 C, R-u 10 zoli (1�-XL57 SPL P r2,1 > 17- Ir ADDMSS: p--` I PRWIL YW RPM.TPr rATEt by: -7-Etcj Reviewed Uni 517d FIRE IG BUIMING SM 'M-r ENC24MIG TAL r*q:LyA=xnnz/mmc (Circle One) 7T/-//-/7-/-/,7 aw-DAM AW MIT117 '/-/7r// 7 7 T/77/-F/-/7T/7 =77 -171-17-17,71-11 CHEOM 111117' -77 17TITI-IF17 TNr NVOTREMENTS 4 -TI-17777-11 M, ATUPM 5 A, kopp. ///;77F/7777// 7 4,- VmICIL, Axess, —77 T 117711 -177 /T PPN-�� (On SiWl 7 7 /7 -f -7 TR77TI T- T ITITI IT 777,7777 nix, Tf 77777777 9 77777T77TITTTIT 717711711 T1 7T7 7 TCATICNS 10 17=77171 -T 7 /7T/7T/7 -ITIT17 -/7T/= 777717 T/777/-7T s t46 LTD#,� 12 ITITIT T SUBDrVTSTCN 1111�s 4-,TLSUBD1W-c 13 f" 77Tf/7'77/77T/T'///////// OONSTROCTT J" --77/,r/777/-//7TF'7PT/Tf/-/ -/T/= 14 ROR PUBLIC' im 3= CONDXTIMIS TrITITTITT17777TI111111 711mll 1%TCR FTEYD afECKED 11/11ITFI-711111111 I= PAVIW3 WTRED..,. 17 �MS M anTER REQUIRED i-11771- "' x N 77777777 IFFI-1-17-TWI-17"T 7 77,7T/77;(i TDatUX P2MIRED -I- -P 7TRP T //P /77 UITRT' JF0 CLYP FOR DRIW.WAY RW) 20 77//T///7 17TTRiTT -17- TF/ -- ?95�=_ NW. SrGN REM 71) //// 21 :,7,1-14 , ;, !�� " ---///77-- 7 7- 77/777 TT7-T-7-/?--77' 17-ITRTI�7--- 22 7T/-/Tf 7/7/ /7777 TF/77777 7T/777/7- -- AVAILMTLITY 23 777717777TI-illl 777TF1777 -- WATER �MhM SIZE D, b 24 7T/7/7 7T/ /T7 7 //T/T//T// 25 LIM Zrza 1777V 77/777777 26 7 Tel T1 TTWT/7777 27 4, 7� 5, 7777717 28 V 777[f 7777/7777 -777 77777 777 = 1� 29 77T17-11,r 7,T1 7 7 7 7 W= CHARM 30 4 'k, ,,I, 7777777T 7 5777777 31 4 oe 32 1'7777T-TR7TITIT 33 R777 7TF/TF/7/ IFIT11TRIT 34 77 /77 /7TF/ i 5 -77 T7-/ T 77 T7 i T1,71 l'i 777TT/777777 IfT --T 7, 17T1 4Wf WIN R"- 77/777 -T - 17,71,717 T / / 11 11 / ": i ON SITE PLAN OPEN 1, 7777/7 ...... 36 IJ/ 4 0 N 7 It By FMINEERING MGR. PUBLIC T-K)RKS MC-R. MEMO TO: Building Division FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: '� '7 6) /,;,/- A �&-z:�wo After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following comments: 1) Connection to City water system required. 2) Connection to City sanitary sewer system required. 3) Right-of-way permit required for any work on City property. 4) Driveway slope not to exceed 14%. 5) Back water valve required if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. 6) Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. 7) Builder/owner responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion on site and may not impact neighboring properties in any way. a Construction hours from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays.