The URL can be used to link to this page

6908 174TH ST SW (2).PDFiiiiiiiiiiii 1041 6908 174TH ST SW NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). CITY OF EDMONDS Call FRospect 6-1107 when work CIVIC CENTER — WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT is ready f r inspection. (No inspec- SIDESEWER PERMIT tions satz:, Sunday or holidays.) N2 3575 ADDRESS--------- --- - ---- 17-4.th ---- Street .... $..-W ... ............. ............................................................................................................... _Ugb.l* I Western Sewer ................................... ...................... CONTRACTOR .. ......................................... . _U OWNER -----_----- ................ Permission is granted ... February .. 19 ------------- 19.7Q_ for ------------------------ days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer with City Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances. ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: NOTE No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected. NOTE No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.. NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%. No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted. NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. NOTE No. 5--It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its appur- tenances except to insert the pipe into the wye. .lP O"A IP" 6-_� V-e--4 62, Li 6. '<.-4 1, L vil cl4t�4vz [22 '- �"- ��e y ��Y --'�-57 4c) 7'V <-- T A0A1 PIA/ wi rH FL A J RC CA P 0. 7671//ZOJ.5 aditk, M CA j WA 6116A 13ASIS OF BEARINGS 0 FOUNO AS NOrf-D PLA r qFlz'A VC Y FOA Z, rHe bry OF LDMOND4 q LAIr 1 1%. i 17 f0VAID momj)me: ACCOADdD W V"' AJ NOW Ad COAal OF JUAVO, JAM COPVA. �t W- fj 09 08 06 0.5 J36 144 1/0.c jule, J4 134 r 4 14" 145 Me 143 5 12A 174TH bL VAC-A-TED—J962. 4 1-3 ,,,,4, ir 0.5 J9 4Z4' le I, C6 71 ff '77 -4 174th S.W. d'IU540'�-654f /ijo.zj M8d'/0'04W -j7j,� jo. J I /Zl. Lie, L 44,5z' -l/ e4f'kv) 1 17 comveyf-o ro me ory A o,, wmoVDS( -F 9 710-503OZO 4007 10 ;0 :4 1 (1) Z .3,t.- 10 t Z4,64 5 113 6 "; :3 > tv OAA 4'W#00. fW- 0 W �40.,A fee. C� W10 4%r�-� em fee. 1,5* 4.-,n f . 1 1487 r .0i Ole* L TIA . Ndl' (021 ji�M) T�,,czc4 (0,Ww,0-e5'j) M5ADOWD*ALE: BEACH "000 -rRAC T 14.5 YOL.6,PG.38 14 02 A e4(makfemr: u4err- Semi WAG A4671(00: FJUD rAAV4!ASd .0 ACCOAACY: COJvMAMJ TO W4cjjZ./'V A�omtjmwns visirw: (,-ed-y al sHoAr -suaDivisloAl FOR hftflLd A. MCLAVOHLIAI Sf_f4 of JUIWA18, reMo A4 tv W M elry or CDMOAIDS imoHoMISH COVAIrY, W-01flAldrOAl am VM Lovell-Sauerland & Associates. Inc. ,K-,0Xf*dA"nu6W-&4AM33" vLYnnw0M-WA WCM 4 -5 94022 Ar T-3-70 A4-C. PAIALICCO SHOAr PL y Cit' of Edmonds y All R /12 C. 1S9Q i. RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number. 9 163 Issue Date: K /?. -) A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: I 2,v .9 Z !9. B. Type of Work (be specific):' Contact: oe-- 5�#4AA 0 CVT!�: C. Contractor: Wa—me. Mailing Address: A 9 0 z 1 14 S11 S ul) Phone: -Z?� StateLicense#: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. E] Commercial E] Subdivision El City Project Q_EnLy�, PTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) F1 Multi -Family Single Family Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut 0 Yes []No G. Size of Cut: x H. Chargq,$ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessftom injud4j WJga, J"7ns of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any a its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and atiorneyfees by reENG[WEL 'W)�mit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCHIS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT Two sets of const - 'ruction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the' working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. 111� ".1 I, have read the abov S�al ents and un e t rmit req 02ments and the pink copy of the permit will be available on sit7a a 1 tinmh fsftt r inspecti pu Signature: Date: -r,��XactdY-or -wa- - VALL DIALS U-11G, PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIZ ISSUANCE. Eng. Di� 1997 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES El NO Partial.Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date.: CITY OF EDMONDS - SE PERMIT ZONE -47 NUMBER C6N STRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION oe SUITE/APT # AUUMEbb 0an 1� OWNER NAMEINAME 0 F BUSINESS EGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LIO NO, Lu z -SW PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved 0 RW Permit Required 1) 0 rqng 17�tbj'vat - CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING REOUIRED DEDICATION — \"N Street Use Permit Raq'd 0 Edmonds,.WA 98026 (49'5) 74� --Z'r-'l 1 PROPOSE Inspection Required X_ NAME Sidewalk Required 0 cc 'M. P. F. METER SIZE LIN&SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 0 NO 0 W t- < U) kD E Ss:. 14 8ttt Ave, 9W REMARKS W Lu cc CITY ZIP TELEPH5NE NUMBER =(906) Sh(-jrz1'irijl-,' WA 177 946- 91 NAME cc ADDRESS ENGIqEERING MEMO DATED "ED BY 5 59R8 174th St-.. SW CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER z Edmonds, WA 98026 1(425) 745- FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY Lu u STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE UA t 0 ir.. C /9-7 VARIANCE OR CU ADB MMTTME # Legal Descr1p.tiod of Prop6rty - include all easements SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT 1. . . . i..1. � ; Z 0 nTX 00()., n_*2�2 TnT I ()p rTr" np gnM COMPLETE I EXEMPT ALLOWED I PROPOSED ALLOWED I PROPOSED 'No easements EXP LU LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS POSED SETBACKS 0 ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR j � z z _j Property LOT AREA NNING RgYIEW BY I DATEI -7 Tal Account Parcel No. 11 00Q1 4r,99n1 REMARKS NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBINGIMECH COMPLIANCE OR AD61-TION COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE Fil El '' APT. BLDG. REMODEL SIGN CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 71 OCCUPANT GRO)q:� GRADING FENCE DAEPAIR' CYDS.' I x _FT) DEMOLISH', WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL INSERT HOT TUB/SPA SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT REQUIRED LOAD ,[:].GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT, V..ROCKERY a X�_Y E S REMARKS -Ail PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 0 3 7PE. OF USE, BUSINESS OR . ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: W NUMBER' 'NU�BEA OF CRITICAL L 0 OF . AR DWELLING EAS -146;5 to 0 STORIES UNITS NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED Construn�_ Ihprrain�t-d mAnnr stonp wal I VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE 60 BUILDING HEAT SOURCE: PLUMBING Plan -Check No. MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private pr6perty ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewpiks, STATE SURCHARGE driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. Permit Application: 180 Days Perml I Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE 06 "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and EING. INSPECTION FEE successors'in interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold pq_ 20 harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, 2 employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of < whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT - — C_� �,7()_ e)�_ _j modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance T6TAL.4MOUNT DUE 0. x nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance I provision.' I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the in ' formatlowgiven iscorrect; and that I am the owner, or th.e duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL ized agent of.,the owner. I agree to comply with city and ,author , THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of -the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her 'Code of.the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance aria RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. TUREJJER P.VGENT) ATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT OF 4CIAL' NA DAT6 CITY OF T L JL Li.). et) EDMONDS -_ .. . 4AA �/�- _/ / 'A CALL FOR I AtE ATTENTION INSPECTIO N IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR �"IGINAt — Filef YELLOW — Inspector 771-0220 .A'CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 10247 lei- q1) jlq:j� PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor A - CITY OF EDMONDS BARUARA FAHEY MAYOR 2 50 1 TH AVENUE NORTH * EDMONDS, WA 98020 , (206) 7 71-02 20 - FAX (20G) 7 11 - 0221 HEARING EXAVIINER FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CIT Y OF EDMONDS Applicants-, V. Joseph Schmidt and Einora R. Hill Case No. V-97-98 Location: 6908 - 174th Street SW ApplIA;atlon: A variance to reduce the required rear setback from 15-feet (in the RS-8 zone) and 25 feet (in the RS-12 zone) to 5 feet to allow construction of a proposed pitched roof over an existing addidon which currently has a Flar roof on an existing single,family residence (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2 through 4). Review Process: Variance, Hearing Examiner conducts public hearirig and makes final decision. Major Issues; a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20,030 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESEDENTIAL - S ite Development Standards). b, Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.85 (VARL4,,NCES). SUMMARY OF 9ECOMMENDATI01%4S AND CONCLUSIONS-. Staff Recommendation; Approvo with conditions H-laring Examiner Decision: Approve with conditions PUBLIC HEARXNG; After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report with attachments, and after visiting the site, the H&arijigExaminer conducted a public hearing on the application. The hearing on the application was opened at 9-31 a.m., September 1.3, 1997, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds Library, Edmonds, Wa;hington, and closed at 9:37 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offercd and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the Planning Division. HEARING CONIrVW.NTS,' The following is a surnmary of the comments offered at the public hearing, io 'd 4 lncor�oralaJ August 11, 1900 9 Sister Citier, International — Hekinan, Japen Wsi AL 16-� -100 Frcim thr, City: Mco, Gi,uwcll, Project Planner, reviewed the staff report and recommended approval of �D the. application with ectlain conditions (see Exhibit A, page 2, Recommendations). She noted that the existing house was constructed under previous county regulations. 0 From the Applicant: The applicants were asked if the staff report and an alysis adequately covered their request and if they would like to add anything further- Onora R. Hill & V, Joseph Schmidt, applicants, stated the staff report accurately reflected thch- rcqvir-st, Thcy addrd that the intrusion into thc rcar sctback is an existing condition and the only change being made was to after the roof line from a flat to a Pitched roor. 'I'licy also indicated a desire to install skylights into the new roof. Staff was asked if the installation of th,� skylights would violate, any provisions regarding height. Meg GRIWC11, Projtct Planner, indicated the skylights would be conforming as, to height. Frorn the Community. No one was present or submitted wTitteri comments from the community. FINDINGS OF FACT ANT11) CONCLUSIONS Site Description Site Development And Zoning-, 1:": Size: The subjoct property is approxi)-nately 24,645 square feet willi property diniensions of approx1mately 165-fett wide by 150-feet fttp 8vith 165 fecl of street Frontage (see Exhibit A, A ttiichment 4). Land Use- The subjtct property is cuirently dtvoloped with a detached single-family residence. Zoning: The subject property is locatea in a,�ingle,fanaily residential zoveond is split between the RS-8 and RS-12 zone, with the zone Une running north to south through Lhc existing house (ke Exhibit A, AtEaChment 1.), 1411 arid Icizaaltiort. I i — �11.1111 41W11 �V tj .f 4 %�m blvvu-b UV V U� 17-11ta Su6at SW and i� LaidiLiLpA *111-1 11c ' grass. shrubs. fruit tre�es and a pine tree, Neighboring Development Aocl Zoning; Facts; Tho propartie.� to the south kind wast are zonad Singlo-Family, Re-idential (RS-8) und ure developed with �ingle-fianiily horner (seo Exhibit A, Attachment 1). The properties to the Mth and east afe zoned Single -Family Re.qidential (RS-12) and arc develope.d with singlt.-farnily hornos (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1). State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) fact. Variances granted based on special circumstances are exerript from SEPA review (WAC 197-11 - 800(6),'b) and ECDC, 20,15A,030). K N'd I 0:sl nHI �6-a -100 41 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance Critical Areas Compliance Eag!N: This propusal is Subject to rOViCW under ECDC Lbapter 20. 15IB (Critical Areas OfdIrtance). The applicant his submitted a Critical Area,,; Checklist , (CA-97-15 1) and a waiver was Zranted to tht; critical areas study roquire.mcrit. Conclusion; The applicant has met the mquircmcnts ofthc Critical Areas Ordinance. Compliance with RS-20 Zoning Standards Fact! The runclarnanud 61L devAopincntstandardst permining to Residenlial devalopynent in tht; RS-8 and RS-12 zones are set forth in Chapter 16-20.030, Thage inclode the. following for locatins structures, RS-8 RS-12 Street Setback, 25 feet 25 fcet Re�ar 5etback: 15 fett 25 feet Side Setbacki: 7.5 fi�at 10 feet Maximurn Height: 25 feet 25 feet Lot Coverage- 35% 359a' Conclusion: The proposal complies Nviih the requirements of the RS-20 zoning standards except for the mar 8etback, Compliance with Requirements for a Variance Facts: Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby'a provOlon of t1le Code may be varied on a case-by-ca,�e haqis if the application of the provision would re.quit in an unusual and unreasonable. hardship. The criteria are as follows: 5 ch as .pcehsl Circumstances; That becaose of special circumstances relating to the property su, size, shape, topography, location or �urroundings of the properiy,.qtrict enforcement of the zoning crtlimmee would Lprive the owner of use rigl,,tsand privilcgcs pci-mitied to Other ProDerlies 'in th-I Vicinity w4b, tbe sxme zoning. Special not be prediiated upon any fa' .10T personal to the owner such as age or dkability, extra expense which may be ncecqsary to wraply with the zoning ordinance, Vie ability to secure a scenic view, the ability to make more profitable use of the prON- rLy, nor any factor resulting from the action of the owner or any past owner of the saine property, SVceial Privilcm: That thr, approva! of the variaricc would not be a grant of special privilege to the PrOpCrly iD comparison with the limitations upon cther propertits in the vichifty with Me same zoning, Cmn .. ensiye,Plan and Zoning Ordinance: That the approval of the variance will be consisicnt with the intent of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, find the. Zolling district in which the property is located, Not DUrlmontali That the variance, as approved or conditionally approved, will not he SignifiCanfly detrimental to the public health, Wety and welfare of injuriou.q 11) [he, property or improvements in the vicinity and the same zone. Q0 A Qb!Q1 n"I iG-2 —ioo t1hilinjim YarlA�M: Thit the approved variance, is (he minfinurn necmary to allow the ownaT rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the sarne zonin-T 1 0' The applicant has submitted declarations with their submitral which address the decisional criteria as follows (set Exhibit A, Attachment 3): The applicants point out that the borne and addition were constructed to County standards then in etFcct, which in 1958 was a 5 foot setback, They assunip, the add' On was added to the back of the house bccause ofa 5 foot rockQTy On the front of [he house. They further assume that the roof on the additicri was cotistrucied as a fizi roof to save moncy. Thc,, applicants point Out that most roofs in the vicinity have a plich to them So tllc:r propose-d chan-c will M,3ko it Inore harmonious with 111C rICighbQTl1.)1x!, The applicants state that the owncrs L)f a holne at 6909 - 174th Street SW received a variance to a rest setback in 1994, so Uie pruposal will not be a grant ofspecial privilege, Thc proposal is consistcnt with the comprebensive. Plan, state the applicinm because it will allow them to rehabilitate and retain older bousing, while P11proYing the aesthetics of the house as seen from the neighboring properties, and doing this without obscuring any views, The applinkmg have milculated that their houte will be well below the zoning heiShE liMit, And will have -a pitch of 4/12, TheapplicanN beliove their propwal is not detrimental becallse it will inct-case the property vilues of neighbc;rs, will not impair scenic views or use of surrounding properties, and involves no perils to their neighbors. Tho 4/11-7 pitch roof is the minimurn varian,,�� mquirce, sQy tho applicants, in ordcr to improvc Cho current inefficient design and irnprove the appcaranec. of the honic to a standard enjoyed by the ftpplicant's neighbors. The current flat roof over the addition has leaked and c4u,5ed some of the rooms to be unusable until the roof car be mended and the dainage repaired. The homc. most dirzctly ndjaccnt to the addition is 17439 - 69th Place W, which fronts on 69Lh Place W and has its sidc yard adjacent to the. -,ubjcxt parmcl's rmw property linc. Ann BuIlls, Plans Examiner, confirnard that a 4112 or 5/12 pitch is a very common rambler - style roof pitch. A 2/112 pitch roof Nyould typically be a tarred roof, Conclusions. The applicants are ar-plying for a varlance to the requinA r��-r scthack- solely to aliow the addition of a pitched roof over an 4ddidon which was constructed with a flat roof. Tho m1dition over wbiob tho proposed roof will be located ww; constructcd lcgally under previous county regulations, with the owner maintaining the, then required 5' ScLback' Zklid choosin$ a flat roof over the addition. Two setback variances have been granted along 174th Street SW, so granting the v,,,triantc would rot constitute a special privilege. Approval of tha prf)por3ed varlanQe wotild alluW for the rehebilitwio;i of ffic -.xi:sting itructure in a manaer consistent with the interit of the Zoning Codo and tha Comprchtnsivc Plan designation. The proposed TOOf Will be more imposing to the house to the south, but will not block any views, nor will their be windows in tho roof, so tho adjaatnt property owners will not loose any additional privacy. The voLtiance will not be detrimental to properties in the area. 4 fro Id Qlrigl nHI LG-2 —100 The variance requested is to allow a 4/12 rAtch roof, which is tho lowest or the cornmon. rambler pitch foofs. This appears to be the minimum necessary to achieve tho applic"mts' desire to upgrade nie strucalre's rooL Technical Commiffee Review by City Departments 14raCt: T'he varianez appligation has bean reviewed and evaluatud by the Firs Department, Public Wvrkh� Division, Engineering Divii:4,,n, ind the Parks and Recreation Division. ne only enrnments received were from che Engincoring Division, Those comments, are inQlLtdcd in Exhibit A, Attichment S. Cpnclusion: The applicant will need to comply with the terrns of any future permits, as required by the Engineering Divigion. Coniprehensive Plan (ECDC) Comprehensive Plan Designation Factl The subject property is degignatzd aa "Sin&le Family Residentitil," Conclu.qo The. proposed development is censistent. with ffieexistiq, Cemprehensive P4m LandUse designation for the site. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies E�I�, The Compreb.-fisive. Plan, ReAcntial Developlileig SeCdL�n, i(IMLIfteS g0'11's ',ind POliCiCs, WhICII nAaw to "Residcntial Dovelop=,ut" -in the City. Specific gDals and policies are oullined Wow: Sect -ion B states as a goal of the City that: "High quality residential d-,velopment which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle Of Edmonds residents sbould be mainrained and promoted—." Policy BA state5 "Support rctrntion and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whoncycr it is economically feasiblo," ' Page 31, sub3cotion MA states, "Residential privacy is a fundamental protection to be upheld by local government," Cunclusion; The proposcd rr.mod-,l will allow for the retention and rehabilitation of older housing, while not allowing any windONY5 to comr. Iny Closer to PrOrffty lilleS, SO iL Will nut adversely . - I nrfiw,; thc- n""al-lbors nrivmy- Therefore it i5 �onsistcrt wkh thc abov2adDpted Zc,,nL, ai.d polidleS 011� tho City. Dr-sCUSION Bmed upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, tho requost for'Varioncc Request Y-97-98 is (Ipproved, subject 10 [he following conditions: I - The rear setback of the residence shall be no less than 5 feet, as shown on the site plan and on the submitted building elevations shown in Exhibit A, Attachmimt 4, 2. The applicant shall obtain abuilding permit prior to any constniction appro,ved under this permit. 5 so Id 0�-191 nHI Le -a -100 3. The applicant shall comply with all the terms of any fu tu re perm its. 4. Tile permit shall be transferable and. run with the land. 2riturcd this Ist day of October, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner C; Under Cha?Ier 20. 100 of the Commimity Developnicnit Code of the City of Edmonds. Donald B. Largen Hearing Examincr RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS The following is a qummary of the deadiines and rocedures for filing reconsideration's p 11.7 arid wlppuihq� Any per&on wi,.,birig to Me or ri�spond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for fuTthcr proccdural information. Request for Reconsideration Section '410.100.010.0 allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a wr! tten request is filed within ten (10) worki ng days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the pablic fiteariDg and signs the aUenclance register andfor presents testimony or by any per.;on holding an oxvnership interegt in a tract of land which is the subject of quch deciqion or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the, rindings and/or the critcria contained in the ordinances governing chl�, type of apphc,,:,.tion being reviewed. Appeals Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appealg of a Hearing Examiner decision or recorni"nendation shall be made. The appeal shall b,-- made in writing, and shall include the decision being appcalcd alang with the name of the. project applicant and th I c da,e of Une decision, the narute and address or Ime Md�Aldu�l Or group Ltppealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to bt wrong, The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the decision bcing appcaled. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20,85.020.0 states "The. approved variance must be acted on by the owner within one year from the date of approval or the variance shall expire and be null and void, unIcs.& tho. owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration and the city approves the appfictaiwi," rl GO'd 091ST nHL Le -a -LOO MEMORANDUM Maw- NAWF Date: - August 19, 1997 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Subject: Variance for Schmidt/Hill (6908 - 174th St. S.W.) (V-97-98) The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The applicant should be aware that if over 2000- square feet of impervious- surface is created, storm water detention will be required. A condition of the building permit will be to pave ' the dri ' veway and construct a vehicle turnaround on the site. The applicant will need to comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application is complete at this time. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION 7098A.DOC PLANNING DATA NAME: SITE ADDRESS:- N-4 S7'�-/DATE: ZONING: X� - PLAN CHK#: 2 7 - �gy' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C0179_6V4 - &I CORNERLOT \"0o (Yes/No) FLAG LOT_,u-& (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: e,� Left Side: -7 Right Side: Rear Actual Setbacks: Ir Front: 2 Left Side: Right Side: Rear. Street map checked for additional setback required? —(Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: 35- —Actual: 94T5 Zo B UILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: —Actual Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: A.D.U. CREATED?: A,, SUBDIVISION: ' CRITICAL AREAS #:., 1� 7 - 15- / - Ul�. I tlel_ SEPA DETERMINATION: — LOT AREA:_�__ �4_14) 9� OTHER: Plan Review By: c:Tz1es\pcmit\�p1andALdoc cn m m ---A, Ae) Ac.TuqL 14 4, T- Aw & ".2 GUAF grew 125 A CAST EL -OVATION on" DEC 2 9 1997 4. 4 I STREET 40 t:A5v,l,j& FILE �Me A- Bulaime DEC .2 9 1997 F,4�YA cs- xf� m 05� AVILMEN DEC *2 9 1997 CITY Copy Ail MCI& l7t* �7-LL V- 9-7-9 Su+t,A i! �,r �bLL kP c, CA FILE NO._C,4— Z,� 7 Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation) I. Site Address/ Location: 6908 174th St. SW, Edmonds, WTA 98026-5227 2. Property Tax Account Number: 51310001452201 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 24,645 4. Is this site currently developed? -X_ yes; no.. If yes; how is site developed? Single family residence 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. — Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). X Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15 % and less than 30 % ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet) . Steep: I grades of greater than 30 % present on site (a vertical rise of 1 0-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No ;Approx. Depth: n/a 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: No Approx. Depth: n/a What season(s) of the year? n/a, 8. Site is in the floodway___�Lo floodplain No of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? No Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year? n/a 10. Site is primarily: forested No meadow No -shrubs No mixed NO urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) Yes 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: — No ^Ca_chk-doc; Rev 02/11/97 City of Edmonds CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or �tq'dies in conjunction with this Checklist to sil�Vlalt in completing their preliminary oiser meni of the site 1 have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and aftest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: V. Joseph Schmidt/Elnora R. Hill N&-ne 6908 174th-St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 Street Address Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 city State Zip V Applicant Representative: Owner Name 6908 174th st. SW, Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 $t reet Address Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 City - State Zip (425 c:rcccpdon\jana\cac1.doc (over) BASIS OF BEARING f ZA r4oF -jaA V-9 Y FOA rne- ciry or wmoAlw ACCOADe.D 1,41L. 14, /*,'L'r& H7 fidaAo5oFjVAVOJAfO COPVA. 09 08 06 J-3811.4.4 il I i 5 M4 - 5 A'Ic*1471)) 74 TH -- 5� I. f r 0, 73, CL u C� > 4 ye A .jf-r IAOA1 PlAtwirH PLAiric CAP .�'.4 -0. 1411/1'Zoils M CA i WASIff-A o FOVAID AS AldreD r&jvD moAlvm&Alr AS NOTCO qu 4C 05 144,134�' 145 146-:�� o-5 ,a 4W. .7 1 --- - FeM141MW I Njo felt r -W, 0. e.5 S) BEACH MEADOW rRACT 145 YOL. .52 1 PG.30 OPY ......... 94-62 281450 Ard-1 F1A1ALjccO.SHoAr PLAr r-3-yo, m-c. rO M f- r. uf-fr- SEMI 4, r.4 rl o A .5 D A o U P, FJUD rAAVWe- ra Y* ,jjr,s f.-M-70 .SJ V Joseph Schmidt & Elnora Hill... 6908 174th St SW FO Edmonds WA 98026 �Z4 L4;�' M jf ,(q of j6cflo"6, reldMr-p WA4 ,ClrY Or CIOMOAIDS JNOHOMISH COUNrY, WAUVAldrOAl vot. 2877-P&GE 5 3. M IM P400 Ud Ave. W. Suits 200 Lynnwood. Wcnhftton 90W Lc - I-Saxleiland (206) 77&M & Associates, Inc. Soallim C206) 3400530 tMLno*n/$4wveyomf?kuwwn/DowebopeowU Conmd$�nts April 30, 19 0 LSA File No. 90-24:9 Legal Descriptions for McLaughlin Short subdivision Entire Parvel The east 166 feet of the vast 311 feet of Tract 145, Meadovdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 433 feet thereof; and, EXCEPT that portion conveyed to. the City of Edmonds for 174th Street S.W. by deed recorded under Auditor's pile No. 7905030267, records of Snohomish County, Washington. I!arcel I That portion of the east 166 feet of the want 311 foot of Tract 145, Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, lying southerly of the southerly margin of 174th Street S.W., as conveyed to the City of Edmonds by deed recorded under Auditor's File Mo. 7905030267, records of Snohomish County* Washington; EXCEPT the south 433 feet thereof. That portion of the east 166 feet of the west 311 feet of Tract 145, Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume s of Plate,, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, lying northerly of the northerly margin of 174th Stroet s w., as conveyed to the City of Edmonds by dead recorded under Lditor's File No. 79o5030267, records of Snohomish County, Washington. a wj--- - �*-::Tx:n g TV7 L- . 450 V Josj �h Schmidt & Elnom Hill 6908 1 4th St SW Edmonds WA 98026 0 28-77PAGEill- L. 5 4 ) �O 145 J. J 74TH' -C-A-TED &W -.10 Oman! goal OMOMMM" onsomeme go 4010 emoomm� doomm� gonna 2 an 74040 IF nor c r I & �X4 e4 4 'F'4fr. 7 / 0 mmmmmmw 77. 74 .0 /J. 174 fh * STO SMO AL 1&. 66 AA �.=.ogggggga,+ 00 JUX,cC N66*10"04W CZ. 7 7' fi 1.5 70. J I' el z r.d 4 7L T -4 or-* ------- Immune zTu Lj 17 T, s P-S -a ri r it cir Al VA j amm" U3 4 co. f 40 *3 zt L _LL LA Z4 ,645 Ravid All SOON P :z OF V—EYS-To;j 4-Tw TeR- (bEeEFOkS PN COAhtff Asah As_13WLT'6P� — CPO" —.1 L4 Sao EXPI ES 12/23/jjq'� Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/ Civil Engineer July 12,1997 Mr. and, Mrs, Joseph Schmidt 6908*'- 174th Street S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98026 Subject: Geotechnicall Evaluation Proposed Slope Keystone Wall This- engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Schmidt property at 6908 - 174th Street S.W., Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required by homeowner concerns, as well as City of Edmonds stipulations regarding slope terracing and Keystone wall construction. References • Plot plan • Legal description • Site photographs (available) Assessment This engineer assessed the Schmidt property on July 10, 1997 (see photographs). The Schmidt property is located on a sloping lot, the maximum slope is approximately 3(H):1(V). The Schmidt property reveals no evidence of any - geotechnical distress. No settlements, no sliding, nor any erosional degradation were evident. The front portion (northerly) of the Schmidt property does abut 174th Street S.W. It appears that a road cut was made during the construction of the City of Edmonds road. There is some evidence of slight soil creep immediately adjacent to the roadway. In order to stabilize the front of their property, the Schmidts desire to install a keystone block wall along the northern property line (see sketch). Properly installed keystone walls with drainage zones are recommended for situations similar to this. Conclusions/Recommendations Based on the findings of this geotechnical evaluation, and experience with similar situations, the following are concluded and recommended: SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIT - LEGAL 17814 8th Ave. N.W. - Shoreline, Washington 98177 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Schmidt Page two * The proposed keystone -type wall terraces along the northern portion of the Schmidt property are geotechnically viable. Geotechnical inspection is required to verify proper base course embedment and drainage zone integrity. It is understood that this engineer will perform on -going inspection during the course of the terraced wall installation. It is understood that the wall constructed to date along the south edge of 174th Street S.W. has been observed and approved by the City of Edmonds with regard to property line issues. Each terrace wall height will vary with specific conditions. On -site geotechnical inspection will determine allowable and optimum heights. It is recommended that walls exceeding six foot in total height not be installed. However, specific engineering materials could allow for walls of any height. It is assumed that an overall aesthetic design is desired and will be obtained. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call me. DMB:vlb I It:XPIRES IM3/ 17- - 5 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer F, 611 WA-L-L- IF TULY I '501�)M I-T Any request for modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") must be specifically called out and identified. Approval of any plat or plan 'containing Provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has - not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. Of S 17405 EXPIRES 1-2/231 t<� P KO PLAI G kskL i N & -P L— Pf (J e.- X V!b 0 V5,�S-rops ET-P-ACEF 6ewfc-cm. twglp'FC-rlOtJ 2:1 vAc�eIZnO-rAL 4&, fj7D C051C TMA FOV- PILL WILL (3Lz- \Z L) 1 t cil Ov f= s N i NIUST 6 i -N 0- AT T I All E 0 F IATRCINI INSPECTIUN bxr F UNE 14D zo 3- to IiA!' 0 0 �,DUOE- ;;,I-- A (Z W PLOW - 00-TE: WALIL P- 6 EOTEC"O.l eAl-llyA?ptoveh ra is -15 Lu r'RK tin 5r_lJ_ ss E_ Cr, SET13ACKS: FRONT SIDE REAR OTHER ff-m a 2 = a mmm SEP 17 CITY COPY SPECIAL INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN CALLED FOR ON THIS PROJECT AND ARE NOTED ON THE "PROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND BUILDING PERMIT. IT IS THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTORS RESpONSIBHjry TO ASSURE THAT REPORTS ARE PROVIDED To THE CITY IN A TIMELY MANNER. BE ADVISED -IF SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORTS ARE NOT FORTHCOMING, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ISSUE A STOP WORK AND NO CITY INSPECTIONS WILL BE PROVIDED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE REPORTING AGENCY HAS COMPLIED AND REPORTS ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. i 6mmAc-_ WAtk, 2)tXCAV*-Tl Q�A Aw> ::r-tL_L I � I � c �� Y� I i I Qt�6� -5fbkuL_ -Fiev_;�f�-� -c- ol -r?n<oX7vvD_i- At-L- 50FA�X-�- Aut- -To "T*--- CZJ A." TRvlE_ OF FOUNDAT ION' -.INSPECTION Vo5oxV -i?;As\,s. 0-M, EET FILE 01 M E M 0 R A N D U M July 17, 1990 TO: File S-10-90 VIA: Planning Division FROM: Gordie Hyde, Engineering Coordinator qcff SUBJECT: SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST FOR S-10-90 I would concur that a walkway is not required on the north side of 174th St. S.W., but.one must be built to City standards on the south side of 174th St. S4W. It should be constructed behind a 611 concrete extruded curb. The face of the curb shall be 121 south of the existing centerline of paving, four inches of crushed rock placed behind the curb and 211 of Class B asphalt paving on top of the rock. Additional asphalt widening of 174th St. may be needed. It should conform to Edmonds' street standards. GCH/sdt WAIVER/TXTST530 Joyce E. and Mei-le R. Mc Laughlii-i 6908 174 th St. SW Edmonds, WA. 9802:16 Phone 743-4339 2-9 0 Cify of Edi'n(--)nds Planning De-partinent 7 1 2 ty f:)f Edin�---'nds Engineering Depal-tment Waiver request for Lot 2 short 1--)lat # S-10-90 per City code # 18.90.030 B fca- dele,-t iori c)f sidevialk 1-l"(41-1irement . Attl-,Cl-ielcl �:are, typographic t-fiaps ankl drawi rig, showing tl--ie. gi-a(--Ies ancl actual street location betweer, lot I and lot 2 of the a T-) o \/ e s h Or t p 1 a t . We sul-mit� the following foijr reasc'ns for deletion Of -ement: ewall., -ecju�i 1:'1.-'YC. - ) A - d r-a 1 to use the. requ ired a I ly i t wou I d not be pra c. i - f f 111 and stal: i I ize sa id f i I I - 1-0 support a ver 1-�pe thv easL etid -,f because the se, e �3 1 - - P 1* t Y See attached drawing of the dedik��ctted p -a (".1 W y 1-1 d t 1-1 t:-. a s - b u i 11 t r o u (I w -i t I i w i g f t. I Ic �--,re no sidewalks in frunt of any I-Ji-opert-Y fi-om h 9 0 Vi�--w drive to 7/2 nd 1-7/4 t - t ..)W in f,-act there are i�o 1111--ffly bloc""s in the -�e ighborhood le 1 1-1 i I !-Iegatt;�s' the y (D f d v e I I:, p i rig t h e� L,--A and w(-)i.-t'!d i--equire W'zt11 ovec flj�� -1 i1e. 1-1 t i Cj P11 -1 cl j 4 t f d '4 ci F. J.-I-event- 1he f v t: U-1(2 !:"i-1 Iv I u r, t'he p16i:j6-:t t1Y. ld Rill t.1 e I f ):el --a j',-, al I :-.,cees on t.-he An�' A - - e.- We vti-C!"I to d E! s 4 b 1. e k 1 11 t h e e x i.s. -L i i ig t r e . zi , a�� th-y cui i-t-i I- I y -,sl. and ai-,(] keep a i 1-1 !- 11'� ti fl�JICLIFML be�l!-Ity Of the 1-1ei9l-1JJ1:)il1C)C-'d- '—:)u foi Verle R. Mc Laughlin, Enc: --�,pogic-tphical map and st-reet 1,-)(--;atdon mi-=ip wdth Slopes -S:'FicDw,rt with side views. 50 4030 20 10 0 50 LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE - 0 Sa-r IAOA1 P/A/ W1rH ?L 4, JrIC CAP tvaD. ?dY111e05,5 BASIS OF BEARINGS (D � a r M CA � W-461fe A ,PL,4 r OF J VA VEY FtO M 0 FOVA10 AS AIO,-P-D fHF- CITY OF f-DMOAMS A E CO A D f- D 1/0 L. 16, MS. T(p f 17 7 ,p§e = FouAiD mo"umevr Ad CM X 0 F 003 V64 S A10. CO., WA. AS NOTED T- Uj 09 08 06 05 38 144 Ui -A18?*,5?'1011E 311. le -I A � --,- I �- - I j 14 3 43 Z0411'4) 7 - e. T 1 -1 16'6" -- -i- 160 J2 146 J 9 5 75' r T S, \J\jj zV — 5 2 F;tD QO 7P j 9 A Z� I lea 6-,&, d:d f,6 Lei e4 4 174th. S S.W. 4. is L 36 (P. 66' -10'04-W - lea-77' 4 4.3. C—pe 1V (9-6 R 13 70. 3 P T L - 44 5e, e) 4, C.? 4, F'w, e. 6 - 7,N) A 17 �j —COA1vf-YF-D W THe cirY 'S"'s OF EDMONDS (,4, F, 9 M05030 e47) ji6 b-1 ?4,64 5 C) "S 7"\7 EX/Jr Rouse 0 > (.'CYC. FW�4Wxo Z .@ Cox. I, OD. f6AI. ci� FO. �(e `4 R ��4,.' v:5, 4. 40'e A ')-0 Ile" 1 % E j \ r D D W D L LP: B —E C H Lj TRACT 14-5 VOL. 5; 1 PG,36 J 4 02 �,VU1FMeVr:,t16T?- 56MI fOTAL, -STAJT10,V - SOM3 45 A4e7HOD: F14ELD r84V6R.Sd ACCOAACY.' CONFOAMS TO W4C3J,?-1J40-O?0 (L .r- 4— SHOAT SUBDIVISIOA1 spvw of stcriome, reM A-4 t,;; W. 44 ory oF t�momos U10HOMIM couAlry m&fwa roA) Lovell-sauerland & Associates, Inc. gngineers/Surveyors/ Planners/ Development Consultants 19400 31d Avenue W., Sulle 200 - Lynnwood, WA 98036 - (206)775-1591 - (206) 340-0&30 DBAWN CUZCKCD I DATE . 10 1 M a rux NO. SCALE m c. c I j. 7: r 4-Ij .3 4 15*0 4?44? J fi&-1 ).!'F1A14L1eE-0 XHoRr,Pz;4r "r-5-?o m-C. M E'M 0 R A N D U M September 27,. 1990 TO: File S-10-90 FROM: Gordie Hyde, Engineering Coordinator qc-#- SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIREMENT OF 174TH ST. S.W. The property owner requested a waiver of the sidewalk requirement on Lot 2 at the time of the building permit application based upon typical criteria. Planning and Engineering concurred at that time. Verbally, at a later date, the landowner further requested a waiver on Lot 1. It is not typical that a landowner own property on both sides of the road, and it is probably unreasonable to request walkways on both sides. 174th St. S.W. is a narrow roadway in only 301 of public right-of-way. To the north is a steep fill slope and the south side is a steep cut slope-retai-ned by a rockery. 174th St. is also not on the comprehensive sidewalk plan, but is the north boundary of the RS-8 zone, which is what triggered the original requirement. Given all of the above considerations, the engineering requirement should be waived. GCH/sdt Concurrence: Robert J. Alberts, City-En§-ineer S1090FL/TXTST530 gi -- [.G CA FrLE NO. Critical Areas Checklist -------------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation) 1 Site Address/ Location: 6908 174tb St. SW, Edmonds, 14A 98026-5227 2. Property Tax Account Number: 51310001452201 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 24,645 4. Is this site currently developed? x yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? Single family residence 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). X_ Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15 % and less than 30 % (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over . a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No Approx. Depth: n/a 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: No Approx. Depth: _ n/a What season(s) of the year? n/a 8. Site is in the floodway____�Lo floodplain No of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? No Flows are seasonal? NO (What time of year? n/a 10. Site is primarily: forested No meadow No ;shrubs No mixed No urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) Y-e s J1. Obvious wetland is present on site: No ^ca.chk.doc, Rev 02/11/97 City of Edmonds lkw CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, . present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Q1 An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and'date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: V. Joseph Schmidt/Elnora R. Hill Name 6908 174th st. SW, Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 Street Address Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 city State Zip (425) 745-4911 4Telep he S ature -LV-U-'-72 ate 67 c:recepfion\jana\cacJ.doc Applicant Representative: Owner Name 6908 174th St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 Street Address Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 City State Zip (425) 745-4911 (over) CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works - Planning/ Building - Parks and Recreation * Engineering o Wastewater Treatment Plant 8/1/97 V. Joseph Schmidt Elnora R. Hill 6908 174th Street S.W. Edmonds, WA 98026-5227 Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist# 97-151 Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Cribcal Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NO-TED: PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CH—ECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critica I Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. so, You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLISTand DETERMINATION WITH ALL _411111IIIIIIIIII PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Enc: Critical Areas Checklist Determination Note Attachments: None * Architectural Design Board C:Reception\Jana\CRLTR.doc ; Thank you. Diane Cunningham Planning Secretary e Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan I..? C. 1 sq'I Dorothy A. Shafer William H. Adams 419 3rd Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 197 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works - Planning/Building - Parks and Recreation e Engineering o Wastewater Treatment Plant 8/1/97 Subject: � Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 97-145 Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. IMPORKANTINFORMA TION TO BE NOT:Eb: PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOUMA Y NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLISTand DETERMINATION WITH ALL .OM PERMIT APPVCA TIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: I Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permii applications. Eric: Critical Areas Checklist Determination Note Attachments: None * Architectural Design Board C:ReceptionWana\CRLTR.doc Thank you. Diane Cunningham Planning Secretary a Incorporated AU9U5t 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan,- Japan NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). CHY Of Edmonds INTER -OFFICE CORRESP N FILE TO f/&Z i FROM DATE SUBJECT L; DEC 2 9 1997 VlEir.gl e-W-0 j3 C )17-7 0 1 I'T .4p 4af�vs 114.6 ACT V A L 153.3 N)4 1, IA\.g 165'.3-8 A 11+j c t' 117-1 i5x. I EXIST. CA R GAK Poer f3wLT 1964 E'X) ST. c III F 20, KiOT �1�1 �J" oo. Lx) �6 14- in 0 3 )?t)O pab rztsc 64249 L- 4 07-PZ"Le- %5cw .40 rvr— pew"Er FI*) P 4 zy. ::� W 2-ob vg\Pr,Io-y ",low wou"m jow JVM6, 'CrAil /4 6.- hr 01 �L�t LL r e "C-Oo + loo. 44 /c2&z/q 17- 103.3 rry COPV i I., I'- 9C-AojjpkIE ZOD 41 oF 04V p2)IIE- U�4y %� - /Z� e . 191"C *7 P/Z/J/N- W,9y. PZO A,,,) 70 1 724-�,r P.R 09-oo'4), 15� eMr PL= 07- 9 4-3 q 7 -)bO7 ascP14 =1 JLOPD P) A/11 DEC 2- 9 19197 k1r) IFIC,W-T 117.7 A 4�( �,&AVE:5 FPbk�7- W Will I] MEMO mm ot �141 1 ! � Ho L)--Ar t I t li7.' EX. ! , EX)ST I r— i CAR GAK PORT -tl222,4 A L 20' vf) HSIC-19T e-N-0 h . 11A-A 15, 1165, C = 117.7 P:r i ii .4p AVE zvaopg 114.8 AC.TVAL 153.3 MOI 14�3 A -t I '+.I. loco c 117-1 1p ; I to -.0 165'.3-8 DEC 2- 1,097 $�7,&-Z44 Pftej aR47Z- , AL --- CITY CO Y 7 E'x I ST. H ;e I EXIST. CA R GAK Powr W),LT 19 64 6CAL,r: I" ! 20' F I OT -31 ,ON LO �6 10- 1112 7. 1074 0 174 A0 rm IPEAW"IF I 0 w L L 4 r, C 9 7 .5TKE + loo. pew-", 12.7. Z stir .0 u -V OF CV -MIPPE 'Zoe) gL 70 977 30SCP14 5CHA4107 =7 J10ED P Ahl/ E cli vi 04 U) 9 P5 n Cq Cq 0 41 (0 C 0 C 00 00 C14 z V) C E V) C-4 I 0 0 Q) 0 C*4 ZONING MAP NOT TO SCALE UTILITYNOTES THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY FACILITIES HAS NOT BEEN RESEARCHED. SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OF THEIR LOCATIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPER TO CONTACT THE "ONE -CALL SERVICE" AND ANY OTHER INVOLVED AGENCIES TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVAL, RELOCATION AND/ OR REPLACEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE SURVEYOR ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF BURIED OBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE MAP. PARCEL DESCRIPTION LOT 1 OF SHORT PLAT NUMBER S-10-90, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9402281450, BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 145, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 38, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. BENCHMARK SET PK NAIL AT END OF 69TH PL W EL=426.48' TOP OF POLE 464.85'AMSL (38.5'AGL) CENTER OF ISOLATOR 463.85- AMSL (37.5- AGL) RES. POWER DIST. 456.85'AMSL (30.5'AGL) ADJACENT ZONING: RS-12 (SINGLE FAMILY) TAXNO. TAXNO. 00513100014408 00513100014523 TAXNO. ....... FOUND 2" BWS DISC WITH ",r 00513100014505 IN CASE, LSA 9891, 912JI20IJ B3 EX SSMH ................... —wit— — EX C8 ... RIM=426.65' .................... . ...... ........ --LRIM=406 EXISTING SITE ACCESS ........ ...... ......................... 1*:N8626�37.-W ................ .. ............. 7777:-�. ....... V ................. -7. EX CB ......... ............... .... RIM=406.48' 4 , al__11.1_ __ -- .... ...... ... ........ . ........... ....... . ........... 77-t97 .. .... `7 . .......... ................... ....... ....... .. =7 .. . .......... ................. 1_� ............. ...... ........... ............... -W ... . . ....... .. -L' *� ... I— % ......... ......... v_ . ..... ...... SE ..... .... ............... .... 77. 291? C13 ........ ............. ........ ......... .............. ......... . . ......................... ... ......... ..... ...................... .......... ...... ....... .. . . ....... .... .......... ... .......... ....... ... 777_7777'�'. 77- ... ........ ................... ... ..... ................ . ..... ............. ...................... ------ MB ............... .................. ........................... ........ �. . ..... .......................................... R:;:q570.'JF-'-'-% ....... N86-29'12-W 1z * , , ,,, ... ............. ........... f31186' ........ ...................... FOUND J" BWS DISC ----4U- .... . .... . ...... W-4 D=1*J6'JJ" L ..... ....... WITH PUNCH 6$ K,6-yST LLL__=44-52 R=i585.31,"r ON ROAD SURFACE 912JI2 0 1 J .. .... 2 PROPOSED AT&T 20'-0" Zo NING: ACCESS EASEMENT MILY) ADJACENT ZONING: 6' KEYSTONE WALL N . . . . . . .% . . . . . . RS-8 (SINGLE FAMILY) 420-- .... 1011 1 1"HOLLY 29*FIR 19' TALL ........ 59' TALL* BASES OF BEARING TAXN0. WASHINGTON STATE PLANE ("0 0=92OW00.500 147HOLLY X CB 424- ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH ZONE, NAD 83 19' TALL ........ ZONING: ..... M=422.98' RS-12 (SINGLE FAMILY) ... ........ Lw RS-8 (SINGLE FAMILY) ... CB............. . .......... ............... ................ . ........ ............ ............... ................. .......................... I ..... . ........ ........................ .......................... ..... p EXISTING ........ 9)N SURVEYDATE i * , , .,.. `0 POLE SEPTEMBER 23,2013 / ...... .... ......... sl BUILDING ow-. -. .. .. .. .. .. .... .... —426— . ......... PROPOSED AT&T 12'x29'EQUIPMENT 430,\ ROOM LEASE AREA WITHIN EXISTING F BUILDING ...11# 1 ...... TAXNO. ... ...... ........ ............. 005131OW14517 ............. 7 7/ ....... ........ ... ......... .............. .4 PROPOSEDAT&T 10'-0' 'N. A-3 RESIDENCE UTILITY EASEMENT .................. C:) TOP OF CONDUCTOR 464.85'AMSL (38.5'AGL) TOP OF TRANSFORMER 460.85- AMSL (34.5'AGL) BOTTOM OF TRANSFORMER,,6 458.85' AMSL (32.5- AGL) 91 TELCO LINE 450.55'AMSL (24.2'AGL) FINISH GRADE 426.35'AMSL (O.O'AGL) N 1111� �11 7 Qz VERED I--, GARAGE CO 711 P47 'I .0 TItj R ARBoRvITAE 4' N881472rW 166.15' J T ........ PINE A-2 N-. 60' TALL ............. . ........ . . ............ . ....... ... .. 3 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA MOUNTED ON .. .......................... ............ -0" WOOD UTILITY POLE OREPLACEMENT 601 ..................................... . ....................... ...... MAPLE wV 45' TALL A RK. S17t.-RENCHY ...... . . ................. 5E). -)PK-. -N TAXNO. .................... ...... TAXNO. ........ [L,:�426,46' , ...................... ....... wm ........................................... 00513100014514 00839200000300 . ................................. N59-56�J8W- - - 50.00' .. .......................... ................ ................. .... I ............. .... ............... ......... ........................................ EX CB . .......................... ................ RIM=426 .................................. . . ............... . ........... ......... ............. ........... ............ ... .. ........................ .... * ... ... .. ........ .. ... ADJACENT ZONING: ............ 4' . ....... ..... ........... ... RS-8 (SINGLE FAMILY) ............... .01 ............ . . .......... . .... ............ .... ............. DBL 9' ALDER 18' TALL — EXISTING UTILITY LOCATES__11_�_ EX SSMH RIM=426, . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101% .*.'.'.'.1'.*.'.'.*.'.*.'.*.'.*.*"., , ........... .......... FOUND NAIL IN 4"X4" CONCRETE ................... IN CASE, DOWN 0.5, 912JI20IJ TAKNO. .......... . .............. ............ ..................... ............. ..................... .......... ...... .............. 00839200000200 .............. -------- .................. .. ........... . ........... .. ....... EX CB RIM=425.68' TAXNO. 00513100014516 5.00' DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT AF1981 10JOJ70 T,4XNO. qr 6P AY ?W M rl 00513100014502 M & Z161 q (V I ENGINEERING DIVISION PPR \/ rn AS NOTF:n Date-� APPRO / JIl ILA 11G RrE �0 �7 q& 6 7o X(0 6 6 & / orie /,? S — 9' Comer Flag �2atbqck, __&gjLa_1f- 0, `9 ef e� -7 C I - Front N ESUB Sides w1C R Rear 5 '76 OCT 0 8 2014 n+har BUILDING DEPAR,�,MENT NOTE 3— CITY OF EDMONDS %LL ACCESS AN*b'O'ti'l[IYEASEMENT�GAD-LA-Y.ER$-6Rg_NOT �HOWN %LONG WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS NOT DESCRIBED NOR DEPTMED )N A/E DRAWINGS PER REQUEST OF SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED AS A PART OF rHELEASE AGREEMENT UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE) (D Commercial LDC Infrastructure Residential THE CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP Telecom 14201 NE 200th St., #100 Ph. 425.806.1869 Woodinville, WA 98072 Fx 425.482.2893 www.LDCcorp.com START DATE: 10-14-13 DRAWN BY: JFO CHECKED BY: RBH REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 2 10-21-13 FINAL ZONING RBH 3 10-30-13 REVISED FINAL ZONING RBH 4 4-03-14 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION RBH 5 5-16-14 REVISED PRELIM CONSTRUCTION RBH 6 6-14-14 REVISED PRELIM. CONSTRUCTION RBH 7 6-20-14 FINAL CONSTRUCTION RBH 8 7-2-14 FINAL CONSTRUCTION IRBH 9 19-19-14 REVISED FINAL CONSTRUCTION 8828 REGISTERED ARCHITECT RICHARD B. HALLI STATE OFWASHINGMN RBH SITE SN2886 HAINES WHARF 6908 174TH STREET SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN SINGLE PHASE TERMINAL POLE DET.A. I L VOT TO SCALE me 11 "xl 7" SCALE: 1 " = 40'